NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Environment

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Dairy conversions: What’s the story?

    Source: PISA results continue to show more to be done for equity in education

    Changes in the regulatory environment for National Environmental Standards for Freshwater

    The  National Environmental Standards for Freshwater (NES-F 2020) temporary agricultural intensification regulations controlling the conversion of land to dairy farmland expired on 1 January 2025.

    Before this date, under the NES-F 2020, consent was required to convert to dairy farming.

    At the time those temporary restrictions on dairy conversions were put in place, the expectation was that regional councils would notify new freshwater plans or change existing plans, to manage effects on water quality.

    Central Government has since introduced restrictions on plan changes that would have given effect to the National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management 2020. A replacement National Policy Statement for Freshwater Management (NPS-FM) is currently being prepared and will give new national direction on managing water quality.

    While consent is no longer required for a change in land use to dairy farming, there are still consenting controls in place under the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan (LWRP) to protect the environment. Both existing and new dairy farms must hold consent for animal effluent discharges.

    Farms may also require water permits for the taking and use of water in the dairy shed.

    Applications for these activities still need to be considered through the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) process with a consideration of the effects of these activities on the environment.

    A consent may also be required for the use of land for farming in general, but that requirement isn’t specific to dairy farming.

    Farming and the environment

    We know that water quality is degraded in some parts of Waitaha. This means we carefully consider all consent applications for the discharge of animal effluent to evaluate the effects of the proposed discharge relative to the existing state of the local environment. Every consent application is considered on a case-by-case basis following RMA process; we can’t pre-determine decisions.

    The likelihood of a new dairy effluent discharge permit being open for public input (being publicly notified) and/or being granted will depend on the state of the receiving environment, the effect of the proposed operation, and the proposed mitigations.

    For example, declining water quality trends in the area where dairy farming is proposed may require a consent applicant to demonstrate how the conversion will not worsen, or in some cases improve, local water quality outcomes.

    If the likely adverse effects of the proposal are deemed to be more than minor, they will be publicly notified to give the wider community an opportunity to be heard.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cyanotoxins in Oregon’s Cascade Range Rivers that are Tapped for Drinking Water Supply

    Source: US Geological Survey

    A study conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in collaboration with multiple water utilities and research partners revealed widespread cyanotoxin occurrence in Cascade Range rivers that provide municipal drinking water to over 1.5 million Oregonians. 

    Cyanotoxins produced by harmful algal blooms (HABs) threaten people, pets, recreation, and aquatic ecosystems. Exposure through drinking, swimming, and dialysis can cause illness, liver damage, neurological effects, and even death. HABs, whether they produce cyanotoxins or not, impact aquatic habitats and impair water quality by blocking sunlight, depleting oxygen, and may cause fish kills. Recreational advisories at popular waterbodies occur each summer, harming local economies, and HABs can sometimes make drinking water unusable. 

    Example of a a Solid Phase Adsorption Toxin Tracking (SPATT) sampler. Passive samplers like this one are left in the river to accumulate toxins over time for later analysis.

    The 2016-20 study examined sources and downriver transport of four cyanotoxins—microcystins, cylindrospermopsins, anatoxins, and saxitoxins —across reservoir-river systems in northwestern Oregon that supply 18 drinking water treatment plants. The study utilized direct sampling of cyanobacterial mats and materials collected with plankton net tows, and the deployment of Solid-Phase Adsorption Toxin Tracking (SPATT) samplers to assess toxin presence in reservoirs, rivers, and tributaries. Over 300 samples from 65 sites across seven river basins, including the Clackamas, North Santiam, McKenzie, and North Umpqua rivers, were assessed. 

    Key findings indicate that cyanotoxins were frequently detected in cyanobacteria from both reservoir and river environments, with over 90% of concentrated samples containing at least one toxin. The research identified both planktonic (drifting in the water) cyanobacteria in reservoirs and benthic (occurring in the riverbed) cyanobacteria in rivers as primary sources of these toxins, which can persist in the water column and be transported into drinking water supply intakes.  “This study provides critical insights into the types of streams and specific locations supporting toxin producing cyanobacteria” said Kurt Carpenter, USGS lead scientist on the study. “The occurrence of multiple cyanotoxins in raw source waters for several drinking water supply plants highlights the need for continued monitoring to protect public health.” 

    Funding for the study was jointly provided by the Clackamas River Water Providers: the Cities of Estacada, Clackamas, Gladstone, Oak Lodge, Oregon City, Tigard and West Linn, the Sunrise Water Authority and South Fork Water Board, Clackamas County Water Environmental Services, City of Salem, Eugene Water & Electric Board, and the Congressionally Directed USGS Cooperative Matching Funds (Directed HABs) Program.

    For more information, access the full study: Reservoir and Riverine Sources of Cyanotoxins in Oregon’s Cascade Range Rivers Tapped for Drinking Water Supply

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cheers to New Adventures: Rip Shively’s Retirement Celebration!

    Source: US Geological Survey

    Breadcrumb

    1. News

    Cheers to New Adventures: Rip Shively’s Retirement Celebration!

    We are both excited and saddened to announce the retirement of Rip Shively, who has served as the Environmental Health Program Coordinator for the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) since 2022. 

                                

    Rip’s contributions to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) span an impressive career of over 35 years, during which he has significantly advanced our understanding of environmental health issues and fostered meaningful collaborations across various sectors.

    Throughout his distinguished career, Rip has exemplified dedication and passion as a civil servant. Rip began his career at the Western Fisheries Research Center (WFRC) in Cook, WA in April of 1990.  In 1990, WFRC was a US Fish and Wildlife Service organization.  He was a temp employee until November of 1992 when he was hired as a term employee, but his leadership and can-do attitude soon garnered him a permanent position.  In 1993, WFRC was moved into the newly created National Biological Service (NBS).  He continued to lead field teams to collect data on the Columbia River, looking at a variety of issues in support of State and Federal Agencies.  The change continued, and in 1996 the NBS was swept up into the USGS.  Around 2000, Rip took a position in Klamath Falls, OR working on the Suckers in Klamath Lake.  His ability to navigate the highly charged political environment and bring in researchers from the Oregon Water Science Center to assist on the project was rewarded with a DOI Conservation Service Award in 2005.  Then in 2008, Rip’s wife’s job required the family to move, and he took a position as the Bureau Approving Official for Biology.  While it was not what he was accustomed to, he took away with him a greater knowledge of the outstanding science across all of USGS.  

    Years later, Rip’s leadership skills, were put to the test when he took on the Acting Center Director roll at Northern Prairie Research Center.  This detail led to the opportunity to apply for the Center Director position at Columbia Environmental Research Center (CERC).  He was selected and served CERC as a strong advocate for the science conducted and opportunities for the staff.  In late 2022, Rip joined the Ecosystems Mission Area as Environmental Health (EH) Program Coordinator.  Within the EH Program, Rip has been leading from the front looking for all opportunities to support the science and the centers. 

    Rip has been a mentor and a source of inspiration for many within the USGS and beyond. His ability to unite teams, promote innovative research, and advocate for One Health has left a lasting legacy that will continue to shape our work long after his departure. He has always taken the time to support and empower his colleagues, fostering a collaborative and inclusive environment that encouraged professional growth.

    In addition to his professional achievements, Rip has also contributed greatly to the spirit and culture of our organization. His enthusiasm for teaching others, his unwavering support for his team, and his knack for bringing humor and camaraderie to our work gatherings make his retirement announcement hard to hear.

    As Rip embarks on this new chapter of his life, we hope he enjoys every moment of his well-deserved retirement. May it be filled with joy, adventure, family time, travel, and dogs. We know he will be missed both professionally and personally, but we look forward to hearing about the exciting new experiences he will pursue.

    Rip, thank you for your years of dedicated service, guidance, and friendship. Congratulations on your retirement!

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Fish driving cars and chimps doing maths: what teaching animals ‘irrelevant’ skills reveals about our own minds

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Scarlett Howard, Research Fellow, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University

    VixtorPhoto / Shutterstock

    Did you know goldfish can learn to drive cars? Have you heard bumblebees can learn to pull on a string? Would you believe some primates can perform calculations with Arabic numerals?

    These tasks seem completely irrelevant to these animals in their natural environment, so why are researchers interested in them?

    As someone who studies the intelligence of insects, much of my own research has been labelled as “ecologically irrelevant”.

    However, as I have argued in Trends in Cognitive Sciences, there are plenty of reasons to study this kind of animal intelligence.

    Finding relevance in irrelevance

    The study of animal intelligence often seeks to form a better understanding of the animal’s ecology. However, there are also many studies that aim to push the limits of animal cognition beyond what we would expect in their everyday life.

    This honeybee has been trained to find sugar water where there are an even number of shapes.

    Ecologically irrelevant research can help us understand the limits of animal intelligence and develop bio-inspired technology. It can also help us explore behavioural responses to environmental change, and advance our understanding of the evolution of intelligence.

    Understanding how animals respond to ecologically irrelevant tasks sheds light on how our own intelligence has evolved. We frequently use comparisons between humans and non-human primates to understand whether a cognitive capacity has evolved in modern humans, or if we observe similar abilities in other primates and animals.

    For example, children as young as 24 months old can find a hidden object in a room when its location is pointed out to them in a photograph. This ability is known as representational insight.

    Some chimpanzees can also pass this test. Do these results mean a chimpanzee has the same level of intelligence as a two-year-old child?

    Furthermore, this test may allow us to estimate when representational insight evolved. It may have been before humans and chimpanzees split into different lineages.

    Researchers trained goldfish to steer a tank on wheels.

    Imitating nature, comparing species

    Biologically inspired (bio-inspired) solutions to modern computing problems use technology based on biology. Some bio-inspired technologies can cope well with uncertainty by using brain-like computations to process and solve real-world problems. Many animals are considered models for bio-inspired technologies based on their vision, behaviour and movement.

    For example, the flight mechanics of dragonflies have been studied to build micro aerial vehicles. Since bio-inspired technology will undoubtedly be used in unnatural situations, it is useful to know how animals would respond in these same scenarios to build more accurate technology.

    Comparing the behaviour and intelligence of different species can pose a huge challenge to scientists. To enable accurate comparisons we need to have a task of equal difficulty for both species.

    If we use a task that animals perform regularly in their natural environments, we run the risk that one species may have an advantage from performing the task more frequently. However, if we use a task that neither animal is likely to ever need to perform, we can “level the playing field” for an accurate comparison.

    Animals must often adapt to new and unfamiliar situations. Environmental changes such as urbanisation, climate change, habitat loss and invasive species introductions cause animals to encounter new challenges that may have previously been ecologically irrelevant.

    A puzzle box may be seem irrelevant to many animals. However, cockatoos in Australia have learned how to open rubbish bins to forage. The cockatoos have then adapted to solve new puzzles as humans attempt to make bins harder to open.

    This “innovation arms race” between humans and cockatoos shows how an initially ecologically irrelevant task may become relevant to an animal.

    Does a true test of ecologically irrelevant intelligence exist?

    One major question is whether we have been able to create a truly ecologically irrelevant task for animals to complete.

    For example, bees have been trained to recognise images of human faces. This task may appear ecologically irrelevant to a bee.

    However, to the bee, an image of a human face may actually represent an unfamiliar but rewarding flower, particularly when the correct option is paired with a reward of sugar water, which imitates a flower’s nectar. Is this task relevant or irrelevant to a bee? The answer is: it depends.

    Many experiments provide food rewards. Therefore, animals may interpret these experiments as a foraging task, thus making even the most complex and arbitrary tasks during tests of intelligence still somewhat ecologically relevant to the animal. Other rewards for animals participating in experiments include shelter, social interactions, and play.

    While the task itself may appear ecologically irrelevant, the reward may be highly relevant to animals looking for food, mating opportunities, safety, or fun. This leads us to question if any task we give animals is completely bereft of ecological relevance.

    Scarlett Howard currently has funding from the Australian Research Council and the Hermon Slade Foundation.

    – ref. Fish driving cars and chimps doing maths: what teaching animals ‘irrelevant’ skills reveals about our own minds – https://theconversation.com/fish-driving-cars-and-chimps-doing-maths-what-teaching-animals-irrelevant-skills-reveals-about-our-own-minds-253938

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta Co-Leads Comment Letter Opposing Federal Government’s Proposal to Significantly Weaken the Federal Endangered Species Act

    Source: US State of California

    OAKLAND – California Attorney General Rob Bonta today co-led a coalition of 16 attorneys general in sending a comment letter to the Trump Administration opposing a proposed rule by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service (collectively, the Services) to rescind the regulatory definitions of “harm” under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). This change, if finalized, would significantly weaken the law’s ability to protect imperiled wildlife, especially from threats to the habitat upon which these species depend for their survival and recovery. This would include destroying breeding and feeding grounds, polluting or draining critical water sources, or degrading habitat, even if those actions lead to the death or injury of protected ESA-listed species. 

    “California is home to more than 300 species listed as threatened or endangered under the federal ESA, whose survival depends on the continued protection provided by the ESA,” said Attorney General Bonta. “Not only would the proposed rule put our ecosystems in critical danger, but the Trump Administration would be making this change illegally. My fellow attorneys general and I will continue to defend laws that protect endangered and threatened species and the preservation of biodiversity. Both humanity and the species with whom we share this planet depend on it.” 

    The ESA has been recognized as “the most comprehensive legislation for the preservation of endangered species ever enacted by any nation.” Enacted by Congress in 1973 with bipartisan support, the ESA provides a national program for the protection and recovery of endangered and threatened species and their habitats. Since then, the ESA has helped bring back several species from near-extinction, including the bald eagle, which is our national bird and an emblem of the nation, and the California condor. 

    In their letter, the attorneys general argue that the proposed rule from the Services, if finalized, will significantly reduce protections for vulnerable species and make it much harder to save such species from extinction, which is contrary to the plain language and purposes of the ESA, as well as longstanding Supreme Court precedent and other caselaw upholding the existing definitions. Not only is this proposed rule in violation of the ESA, but it also violates the Administrative Procedure Act and the National Environmental Policy Act. 

    California has millions of acres of lands that provide habitat for endangered and threatened species, and numerous local jurisdictions and private parties adhere to voluntary habitat conservation plans. These plans adjust land uses and development plans, and provide habitat protection and mitigation programs, to allow for reasonable economic development while avoiding, minimizing, and mitigating harm to listed species and their habitats. 

    California Attorney General Bonta co-led the letter with Massachusetts Attorney General Joy Campbell and Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown. They were joined by the attorneys general of Arizona, Conneticut, Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington.  

    A copy of the comment letter can be found here. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Reconciliation Recommendations of the House Committee on Natural Resources

    Source: US Congressional Budget Office

    Legislation Summary

    H. Con. Res. 14, the Concurrent Resolution on the Budget for Fiscal Year 2025, instructed the House Committee on Natural Resources to recommend legislative changes that would decrease deficits by not less than a specified amount over the 2025-2034 period. As part of the reconciliation process, the House Committee on Natural Resources approved legislation on May 6, 2025, with provisions that would decrease deficits.

    Estimated Federal Cost

    In CBO’s estimation, the reconciliation recommendations of the House Committee on Natural Resources would, on net, decrease deficits by $20.2 billionover the 2025-2034 period. The estimated budgetary effects of the legislation are shown in Table 1. The costs of the legislation fall within budget functions 300 (natural resources and environment) and 950 (undistributed offsetting receipts).

    Return to Reference

    Table 1.

    Estimated Budgetary Effects of Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, House Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Budget Authority

    2,018

    -575

    -835

    -1,722

    -1,748

    -2,437

    -2,698

    -3,146

    -3,835

    -4,355

    -2,862

    -19,333

    Estimated Outlays

    -122

    -521

    -659

    -1,523

    -1,504

    -2,224

    -2,254

    -2,693

    -3,377

    -4,096

    -4,329

    -18,973

     

    Increases in Revenues

       

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

     

    Net Decrease in the Deficit

    From Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues

       

    Effect on the Deficit

    -122

    -586

    -789

    -1,653

    -1,639

    -2,364

    -2,394

    -2,838

    -3,527

    -4,246

    -4,789

    -20,158

    Basis of Estimate

    For this estimate, CBO assumes that the legislation will be enacted in summer 2025. CBO’s estimates are relative to its January 2025 baseline and cover the period from 2025 through 2034. Outlays of directly appropriated amounts were estimated using historical obligation and spending rates for similar programs.

    CBO expects that the share of bonus bids, rents, and royalties from onshore oil, gas, coal, and renewable-energy production paid to states and counties would be subject to sequestration under the Budget Control Act of 2011. CBO estimates that a portion of those payments would be sequestered in each year, starting in 2027 and ending in 2032. However, in every subsequent year, starting in 2028 and ending in 2033, those amounts would be restored, resulting in a net zero budgetary effect over the 2025‑2034 period. CBO includes those effects in its estimates for sections 80101, 80111, 80121, 80122, 80141, 80144, 80181, 80301, 80303, 80304, and 80305.

    Direct Spending

    CBO estimates that enacting the legislation would decrease direct spending outlays by $19.0 billion over the 2025-2034 period (see Table 2).

    Subtitle A. Energy and Mineral Resources

    Subtitle A would require new lease sales on federal land for onshore and offshore oil and gas, coal, and renewable energy and would change permitting processes. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would decrease direct spending by $19.7 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Federally owned energy resources are developed under a leasing system that requires companies to bid on tracts of land. Winning bidders remit payments called bonus bids when leases are issued; pay annual rent on nonproducing leases; and pay royalties on the value of any oil, gas, coal, or electricity produced from the leased land. Those payments are recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts—that is, as reductions in direct spending. Unless otherwise noted, those fees are deposited in the Treasury.

    Part I. Oil and Gas

    Sections 80101 through 80105 would increase the minimum number of oil and gas lease sales required each year, reinstate noncompetitive oil and gas lease sales, establish permitting by rule for oil and gas drilling, expand the practice of commingling oil and gas production, and reduce royalty rates for new onshore oil and gas leases from 16.67 percent to 12.5 percent. Those sections interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Onshore Oil and Gas Leasing Sales. Section 80101 would require the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to conduct at least four onshore oil and gas lease sales each year in specified states where land is available for oil and gas development under the Mineral Leasing Act. Under current law, the Department of the Interior (DOI) has discretion to postpone or cancel oil and gas lease sales; the section would require BLM to conduct a replacement sale if a sale is canceled. CBO estimates that the resulting number of onshore oil and gas leases would increase by 1,300 annually, on average, over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that the interactive effects of enacting this section and sections 80102 through 80105, discussed below, would increase offsetting receipts from bonus bids, rents, and royalties by $12.8 billion, on net, over the 2026-2034 period, after adjusting for the effects of sequestration.

    Noncompetitive Leasing. Section 80102 would reinstate BLM’s authority, rescinded by the 2022 reconciliation act, to award federal land for oil and gas development in noncompetitive leases if no successful bids are made in a competitive sale. Using data from the agency, CBO estimates that enacting the section would increase onshore oil and gas leasing by 150 to 180 leases each year, thus increasing oil and gas production and related collections of royalties over the 2025‑2034 period. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Permit Fees. Section 80103 would direct DOI to approve applications that allow operators to commingle onshore oil and gas production from multiple sources within a single well. Operators would be required to pay a $10,000 fee and install volume-measuring equipment to ensure appropriate oil and gas allocation and royalty payments. BLM currently allows onshore operators to commingle production under certain conditions; enacting this provision would expand that practice.

    Information from industry sources and BLM indicates that commingling can produce larger yields over shorter periods than is likely with permitting and drilling separate wells. CBO estimates that under this provision DOI would approve an average of 1,000 applications annually over the 2025‑2034 period; thus, royalty collections would increase relative to current law.

    Within two years of enactment, section 80103 also would require DOI to establish a permit-by-rule program. Under the program, leaseholders would purchase permits (at a cost of $5,000) allowing them to notify a permitting authority of their compliance with certain rules. That process would shorten the time to begin oil and gas development.

    Using information from industry sources and BLM, CBO estimates that under this provision, DOI would receive more than 3,000 applications annually over the 2025-2034 period. We expect that oil and gas production would accelerate by about 200 days, on average, increasing royalty payments relative to current law. CBO further expects that under section 80103, future leased parcels would become more valuable, increasing future bonus bids for onshore leases. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Permitting Fee for Non-Federal Land. Section 80104 would prohibit DOI from requiring permits to drill for oil and gas leases under certain conditions, including drilling in places where the federal government owns less than 50 percent of the minerals or does not own the surface of the drilling area. Operators would be required to pay a $5,000 fee for each lease. Using information from the agency, CBO estimates that fewer than 200 such cases would occur each year over the 2025-2034 period. CBO estimates that oil and gas production would accelerate by about a year in those cases, increasing royalties paid to the federal government. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Reinstate Reasonable Royalty Rates. Section 80105 would reinstate a royalty rate of 12.5 percent for new onshore oil and gas leases. The 2022 reconciliation act set the royalty rate at 16.67 percent. (The legislation would not affect the royalty rate for outstanding leases.) CBO expects that one effect of lowering the rate would be to reduce royalty receipts from new lease sales that CBO projects would occur under current law. CBO also expects that lowering the rate would increase oil and gas production on those sites, because of the potential for increased profits for operators and leaseholders, thus increasing royalty collections. In addition, CBO expects that future leased parcels would become more valuable, thus raising future bonus bids on onshore leases. This provision interacts with other sections and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under section 80101.

    Under current law, through August 2032 the royalty rates for offshore oil and gas leases must be between 16.67 percent and 18.75 percent, and at least 16.67 percent after that. This provision would permanently set the rate between 12.5 percent and 18.75 percent. Based on royalty rates for recent oil and gas leasing, CBO expects that the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) would continue to impose a rate of 18.75 percent; on that basis, CBO expects that the legislation would not affect the royalty rate for future offshore oil and gas leases.

    Part II. Geothermal

    Sections 80111 and 80112 would require annual geothermal lease sales and exclude power plants outside of the leasing area from paying royalties on geothermal resources used by those plants. The two sections interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80111.

    Geothermal Leasing. Section 80111 would require DOI to hold annual geothermal lease sales and replace canceled or delayed sales within the same year. Sales would include parcels in each state that are eligible for geothermal development under the Federal Land and Management Act of 1976. Under current law, DOI holds geothermal lease sales every other year. Winning bidders remit bonus bids as leases are issued and they pay annual rent on nonproducing leases and royalties on the value of any electricity produced and sold from the leased land. Geothermal projects on federal land take between seven and nine years from leasing to electricity production, depending on permitting, exploration results, and financial resources.

    Using information from the industry and data from BLM, CBO estimates that under the legislation DOI would issue about 450 new leases through 2034. CBO estimates that, after sharing a portion of those receipts with states and counties where the activities occur, the legislation would increase net offsetting receipts by $23 million from bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration.

    Geothermal Royalties. Section 80112 would exclude from royalty payments federal geothermal resources that support power plants located outside the boundaries of the federal geothermal leasing area. Under current law, using geothermal resources within or outside an area does not exempt lessees from paying royalties. Using data from BLM, CBO estimates that more than half of all power plants that access federal geothermal resources would be excluded from paying royalties under this provision, decreasing royalty payments under new leases.

    Part III. Alaska

    Part III would reinstate the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program and require new lease sales in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska.

    Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing. Section 80121 would require BLM to reinstate six leases canceled after the 2021 lease sale. CBO expects that the lessees would repay the $8 million for bonus bids they received in reimbursements after the cancellation and that they would pay rent totaling $3 million a year until production begins.

    This provision also would require BLM to conduct at least four oil and gas lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge within 10 years of enactment. BLM would be required to offer a minimum of 400,000 acres in each sale, or the total number of unleased acres available at the time of a sale. The legislation would require those sales to be conducted under terms established by the “Record of Decision for the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing Program, Alaska,” dated August 21, 2020.

    Section 80121 also would require BLM to issue any rights-of-way, easements, permits, or other necessary authorizations for the exploration, development, production, and transportation of oil and gas under those leases. Those authorizations would be considered to satisfy all federal laws, including the Alaska National Interest Lands Act, Endangered Species Act, and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and they would be exempted from judicial review. CBO expects that enacting those provisions would significantly increase the likelihood that companies would participate in each sale and the amount that companies would bid in those sales.

    Using information from BLM, the U.S. Geological Survey, and industry experts, CBO estimates that the reinstated and new leases awarded under the legislation would increase net offsetting receipts to the federal government by $946 million from bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration. That amount is adjusted for sequestration and incorporates the 50 percent that would be paid to Alaska under current law.

    Estimates of bonus bids, rents, and royalties from leases in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge are uncertain. Potential bidders might make assumptions that are different from CBO’s, including assumptions about long-term oil prices, production costs, the amount of oil and gas resources in the area, production timelines, and alternative investment opportunities. The number of factors that affect companies’ investment and operation decisions result in wide ranges for bonus bids, rents, and royalties. CBO’s estimate represents the midpoint of those ranges.

    National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska. Section 80122 would direct DOI to resume the oil and gas leasing program under the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976, requiring a lease sale within one year of enactment, and every two years thereafter. Under regulations issued in 2020, BLM would offer a minimum of 4 million acres in each sale. The legislation would deem all sales to meet environmental requirements established in NEPA.

    Using information from BLM, the U.S. Geological Survey, and industry groups, CBO estimates that bonus bids, rents, and royalties from the reinstated and new leases would increase net offsetting receipts by $532 million over the 2025‑2034 period, after adjusting for sequestration. That amount is adjusted for sequestration and incorporates the 50 percent that would be paid to Alaska under current law.

    Part IV. Mining

    Part IV would reinstate mining leases in national forest land in the state of Minnesota and require the necessary approvals and permits for a new road in Alaska.

    Superior National Forest Lands in Minnesota. Section 80131 would rescind an order issued by BLM in 2023 that was effective for a period of 20 years and subject to valid existing rights. That order withdrew more than 225,000 acres of National Forest System land in Minnesota from mineral and geothermal leasing. This provision would require the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior to reissue all mineral leases for a 20-year term with an option for renewal. The remaining terms of the reinstated leases would be as they were originally and the leases would be exempt from judicial review.

    Using information from BLM on the leases’ terms, CBO expects that leaseholders would pay combined annual rent and minimum royalties of about $400,000 and would pay a 6 percent royalty on the gross value of minerals mined. Based on information from the industry, CBO expects that state and local permitting and preproduction activities would take about seven years to complete. Because of uncertainty about when and whether leaseholders would obtain the necessary state permits, CBO used a 50 percent probability that production would begin after 2031 but before 2034. On that basis, CBO estimates that the federal government would collect $81 million in rents and royalties over the 2025-2034 period.

    Ambler Road in Alaska. Section 80132 would require federal approval for rights-of-way, permits, licenses, leases, and any other authorizations needed to access public land for the construction of the Ambler Road across the western unit of the Gates of the Arctic National Preserve and the Central Yukon Planning Area in Alaska. All authorizations would be granted under the 2020 Ambler Road Environmental Impact Statement and would be exempt from judicial review. This provision also would establish an annual rent of $500,000 from 2025 through 2034. CBO estimates that enacting the provision would reduce direct spending by $4 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part V. Coal

    Part V would require DOI to rescind the temporary pause on coal leasing and reduce the royalty rate on existing and new coal leases. Sections 80141 through 80143 interact and CBO has shown the estimates of their combined budgetary effects under section 80141.

    Coal Leasing. Section 80141 would direct DOI to process and approve qualified applications for coal leases and provide any necessary approvals for mining. The legislation also would require DOI to make available a minimum of 4 million additional acres with known recoverable coal reserves in the lower 48 states and Alaska. That requirement would exclude national parks and monuments as well as historic, wilderness, recreational, and conservation areas. After adjusting for the effects of sequestration, CBO estimates that the bonus bids, rents, and royalties would increase offsetting receipts by $237 million over the 2025‑2034 period.

    Future Coal Leasing. Section 80142 would rescind a 2016 Secretarial Order from DOI that paused the issuance of new federal leases for thermal coal. This provision interacts with section 80141 and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under that section.

    Coal Royalty. Section 80143 would reduce the royalty rate on federal coal leases from 12.5 percent to 7 percent. That rate would apply to existing and new leases from the date of enactment through September 30, 2034. CBO estimates that the reduction would increase direct spending during the same period by reducing offsetting receipts. This section interacts with section 80141 and CBO has shown the estimated budgetary effects under that section.

    Authorization to Mine Federal Minerals. Section 80144 would authorize the mining of all coal reserves under certain federal coal leases previously issued for about 800 acres in Montana. Mining authorizations would be provided in accordance with a 2020 mining plan modification. Using information from BLM, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase net royalties by $42 million in the 2025‑2034 period, after sharing 50 percent of the total receipts with the state of Montana. The estimate is adjusted for the effects of sequestration.

    Part VI. NEPA

    Part VI would authorize sponsors of projects that require environmental assessments or environmental impact statements under NEPA to pay a fee to potentially expedite completion of the assessments or statements and for exemption from judicial review.

    Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews. Section 80151 would authorize sponsors of projects that require environmental assessments or environmental impact statements under NEPA to pay a fee for a potentially expedited completion of the assessment or statement and for exemption from judicial review. The fee would be set at 125 percent of the anticipated costs to prepare or supervise the preparation of the assessment or statement.

    CBO expects that the exemption from judicial review would accelerate the start date of some large, federally funded transportation, energy, and infrastructure projects that otherwise would have been delayed by litigation. Based on NEPA litigation data and factoring in the chance that projects would be delayed by other litigation (for example, challenges under the Endangered Species Act), CBO anticipates that enacting section 80151 would accelerate those projects by about two years. We also expect that some federally funded projects that would have been permanently stopped by a challenge under current law would commence under this provision. CBO estimates that accelerating or starting those formerly delayed or stopped projects would increase direct spending by $190 million over the 2025-2034 period. (CBO expects that federal funds for those projects would have been spent more slowly or would not have been spent at all, under current law.)

    Finally, CBO expects that enacting section 80151 would accelerate the start of some energy projects on federal land, increasing the collection of rents and royalties over the 2025-2034 period. Those effects are included as interactive effects in other sections.

    Rescission Relating to Environmental and Climate Data Collection. Section 80152 would rescind the unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act to the Council on Environmental Quality. Using information from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), CBO estimates that enacting this provision would decrease direct spending by $25 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part VII. Miscellaneous

    Part VII would require a fee for the filing of protests against oil and gas lease sales. The receipts collected under the provision would reduce direct spending.

    Protest Fees. Section 80161 would establish filing fees to submit protests against oil and gas lease sales; the fees would depend on the number of pages and protests in each filing. Using data from BLM on protests and the estimated increases in oil and gas leasing under the legislation, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase offsetting receipts by $5 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part VIII. Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing

    Part VIII would require new sales of offshore oil and gas leases, authorize the commingling of offshore oil production from multiple reservoirs within a single well under certain conditions, and increase the amount of energy receipts that may be distributed to states and conservation programs. Sections 80171 and 80172 interact and CBO has shown the combined estimates of their budgetary effects under section 80171.

    Mandatory Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Sales. Section 80171 would require BOEM to hold at least 30 lease sales in the Gulf of America during the 15 years after enactment and 6 lease sales in Alaska’s Cook Inlet during the 10 years after enactment. Those sales would be held annually according to a schedule described in the legislation.

    In September 2023, BOEM released its five-year plan for holding Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease sales during the 2024-2029 period. The Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act requires BOEM to issue leasing schedules; any significant revisions require a process for consultation and rulemaking. Under the current five-year plan, the agency intends to hold two more sales in the gulf: one each in 2027 and 2029. The plan does not include sales in the Alaska Outer Continental Shelf. The legislation would authorize BOEM to hold the new sales in addition to those in the five-year plan.

    CBO expects that, under the legislation, BOEM would hold 24 additional offshore oil and gas sales by the end of 2034: 18 in the gulf and 6 in the Cook Inlet. Because planning and executing a lease sale takes between six months and two years, CBO expects that the sale that the legislation would require before August 15, 2025, would occur in a later year. CBO estimates that new offshore lease sales would generate $6.3 billion in bonus bids, rents, and royalties over the 2026-2034 period. That estimate includes the effects of enacting section 80172.

    Offshore Commingling. Section 80172 would require DOI to approve operator requests to commingle offshore oil production from multiple reservoirs within a single well unless there is conclusive evidence that safety is threatened or aggregate production could decline. The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement currently generally allows offshore leaseholders to commingle production if the pressure differential between reservoirs is under 200 pounds per square inch, though in one region, that differential is set at below 1,500 pounds per square inch. The legislation would authorize commingling at any pressure differential if safety and production are unaffected.

    According to academic research and industry feedback, commingled wells can be more productive, on average, than sequential wells. On that basis, CBO expects that enacting the provision would increase the number of commingled wells, leading to increased production. CBO also expects that future leased tracts would become more valuable, increasing the amount of future bonus bids on offshore leases.

    Using information from BOEM, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, and industry groups, CBO expects that the provision would increase offsetting receipts relative to current law. This section interacts with section 80171 and CBO has shown its effects in the estimate for that section.

    Limitations of Amount of Distributed Qualified Outer Continental Shelf Revenues. Section 80173 would amend the Gulf of Mexico Energy Security Act of 2006 to increase the amount of energy receipts that may be distributed to states and conservation programs. Under current law, not more than $500 million in receipts collected from leases entered into on or after December 2006 may be distributed in each year through 2055; the legislation would allow up to $650 million to be distributed in each year through 2034. CBO expects that the new funding resulting from increasing the cap would be subject to sequestration beginning in 2027, which would reduce spending by about $50 million over the 2027-2032 period. Accounting for sequestration, CBO estimates that increasing the cap to $650 million would increase direct spending outlays by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Part IX. Renewable Energy

    Part IX would establish a standard formula to calculate the capacity fee (an equivalent to royalty payment) paid to the federal government under geothermal leases and require the Treasury to distribute a part of those receipts to the states and counties where the operations take place. Sections 80181 and 80182 interact and CBO has shown the estimate of their combined budgetary effects in the estimate for section 80181.

    Renewable Energy Fees on Federal Lands. Section 80181 would establish a formula to calculate rental rates and the capacity fees paid to the federal government under solar and wind leases on federal land. A capacity fee is a royalty based on the energy produced and sold under those leases. Under current law, BLM establishes and can modify those formulas by rule. The capacity fee calculation under this provision would apply to existing and new leases and would, in CBO’s estimation, increase the total offsetting receipts collected relative to current law. Using information from BLM on current and estimated future wind and solar projects, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would increase offsetting receipts by $180 million over the 2025-2034 period, after adjusting for the effects of sequestration.

    Renewable Energy Revenue Sharing. Section 80182 would require the Treasury to distribute 25 percent of the offsetting receipts from wind and solar leases on federal land to the states and counties where those operations take place. The federal government does not currently distribute any of those receipts to states. CBO estimates that enacting this provision would increase direct spending over the 2025-2034 period. This section interacts with section 80181 and CBO has shown its budgetary effects in the estimate for section 80181.

    Subtitle B. Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries

    Subtitle B would rescind certain unobligated balances from funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act and provide funding for water storage and conveyance activities. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would increase outlays, on net, by $2.4 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Rescission of Funds. Sections 80201 and 80202 would rescind certain unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act. Using information from OMB, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would decrease outlays over the 2025-2034 period by the following amounts:

    • $100 million for Investing in Coastal Communities and Climate Resilience; and

    $29 million for Facilities of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

    Surface Water Storage Enhancement. Section 80203 would provide $2 billion in 2025 to the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) to increase the capacity of existing surface water storage facilities. The section also would exempt those funds from cost-sharing, matching, and reimbursement requirements, which are typical for financing projects for developing water storage.

    CBO expects that the funds would allow BOR to move forward with the Shasta Dam and Reservoir Enlargement Project by removing the requirement to engage a nonfederal partner. Based on historical spending patterns and information from the agency, CBO estimates that enacting this provision would increase direct spending by $2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Water Conveyance Enhancement. Section 80204 would directly appropriate $500 million in 2025 to BOR to increase the capacity of existing water conveyance facilities. Based on historical spending patterns and information from the agency, CBO expects that the amounts provided would be fully spent over the 2025-2034 period.

    Section 80204 also would exempt the amounts provided from cost-sharing, matching, and reimbursement requirements, which are typical for financing conveyance projects. That could affect spending subject to appropriation, but CBO has not reviewed this provision for such effects.

    Subtitle C. Federal Lands

    Subtitle C would prohibit BLM from implementing certain resource management plans and rescind unobligated funds from the Forest Service and BLM. CBO estimates that enacting the subtitle would decrease direct spending by $1.6 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Prohibition on the Implementation of Field Office Management Plans. Sections 80301 through 80305 would prohibit DOI from implementing, administering, or enforcing five BLM Resource Management Plans made final between October 2024 and January 2025 for the Rock Springs and Buffalo Field Offices in Wyoming, the Miles City Field Office in Montana, a statewide plan for North Dakota, and the Colorado River Valley and Grand Junction Field Offices in Colorado. After adjusting for the effects of sequestration, CBO estimates that enacting those provisions would decrease direct spending by a total of $261 million over the 2026-2034 period.

    Rescissions of Funds. Sections 80306, 80307, 80308, and 80309 would rescind certain unobligated balances of funds directly appropriated in the 2022 reconciliation act. Using information from the OMB, CBO estimates that enacting those rescissions would decrease outlays over the 2025-2034 period by $287 million for the Forest Service, the National Park Service, and BLM.

    Celebrating America’s 250th Anniversary. Section 80310 would provide $190 million for DOI to commemorate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the United States of America and establish and maintain a statuary park named the National Garden of American Heroes. Based on historical spending patterns, CBO expects that the directly appropriated amounts would be fully spent over the 2025-2034 period.

    Long-Term Contracts for the Forest Service. Section 80311 would require the Forest Service to enter into at least one 20-year contract for timber harvesting per region each year over the 2025-2029 period. CBO expects that the sales required within one year of enactment would occur in a later year.

    This section would establish the contracts’ terms and conditions. Under current law, proceeds from national forests’ timber sales are deposited into various funds, depending on the authority under which the sale is conducted; amounts deposited into those funds can be spent without further appropriation. This provision would require the proceeds from the sales conducted under the legislation to be deposited in the Treasury. Thus, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would decrease direct spending over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that section 80311 would interact with section 80313. That section would require the Forest Service to harvest and sell a minimum of 25 percent more timber than the amounts it sold in fiscal year 2024.

    CBO estimates that of the additional timber sales conducted under section 80313, half could be harvested through the required long-term contracts. Using data on timber sales and accounting for the interaction between the two sections, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would increase offsetting receipts by $111 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Long-Term Contracts for the Bureau of Land Management. Section 80312 would require BLM to enter at least one 20-year contract for timber harvesting per region each year over the 2025-2029 period.

    This section would establish the contracts’ terms and conditions. Under current law, most proceeds of timber sales on public land under the jurisdiction of BLM are deposited into various funds depending on the authority under which the sale is conducted; amounts deposited into those funds can be spent without further appropriation. This provision would require the proceeds from the sales conducted under the legislation to be deposited in the Treasury as offsetting receipts. Thus, CBO estimates that enacting the provision would decrease direct spending over the 2025-2034 period.

    CBO estimates that half of the timber sold under section 80314 could be harvested under long-term contracts. That section would require BLM to harvest and sell a minimum of 25 percent more timber than it sold in fiscal year 2024. Using data on timber sales and accounting for the interaction between the sections, CBO estimates that enacting those sections would increase offsetting receipts by $46 million over the 2025-2034 period. Furthermore, CBO expects that the sales required within a year of enactment would occur in a later year. CBO expects that section 80312 would interact with section 80314 and the combined estimated budgetary effects are shown in the estimate for section 80312.

    Bureau of Land Management Land in Nevada. Section 80315 would direct DOI to identify and convey federal land, managed by BLM, in non-metropolitan areas of four counties in Nevada. The provision would require BLM to sell the land below fair-market value upon request by certain counties to use it for affordable housing. Otherwise, the land would be sold or exchanged for a price that is at or above fair-market value. Proceeds from those sales are recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts.

    Based on public maps describing available land for disposal in the state and information from BLM, CBO estimates that roughly 400,000 acres are identified for conveyance under this section. Much of that land is in Pershing County and is estimated to be encumbered with mining claims, millsites, or tunnel sites (roughly 250,000 acres). Encumbered land would be offered at fair-market value to the owner of the encumbrance under this section, and CBO expects that those acres would be conveyed over the 2025‑2034 period. For the remaining acres, CBO used a 50 percent probability that some of the available land would be identified for disposal and a 50 percent probability that the land so identified would be conveyed. On that basis, CBO estimates that 40,000 acres would be conveyed under the legislation over the next 10 years.

    Using information from DOI, related organizations, and past land sales in the state, CBO estimates that enacting this section would reduce direct spending by $819 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Forest Service Land in Nevada. Section 80316 would direct the Department of Agriculture to identify and convey federal land managed by the Forest Service in Washoe County, Nevada. The provision would require the department to sell the land below fair-market value upon request by the county to use for affordable housing. Otherwise, the land would be sold at or above fair-market value. Proceeds from the sales would be recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts. Based on information from other land sales, CBO estimates that enacting section 80316 would reduce direct spending by $7 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Federal Land in Utah. Section 80317 would require DOI to convey roughly 11,000 acres of federal land managed by BLM in Utah. The section would require DOI to sell the land at or above fair-market value. CBO expects that identifying and conveying the land would take several years. Proceeds from the sales would be recorded in the budget as offsetting receipts Using information on land values from BLM, CBO estimates that enacting section 80317 would reduce direct spending by $293 million over the 2025-2034 period.

    Revenues

    Enacting the legislation would increase revenues by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period. (see On that basis, CBO estimates that enacting section 80151 would increase revenues, on net, by $1.2 billion over the 2025-2034 period.

    Uncertainty

    Many of CBO’s estimates for spending and revenues are subject to uncertainty because they rely on underlying projections and other estimates that are themselves uncertain.

    Several areas of the legislation are subject to particular uncertainty:

    • Projecting bonus bids, rents, and royalties from onshore and offshore oil, gas, and coal leasing depends on future prices of those fuels and minerals, the number of new leases that would begin production within the 10-year window, and the amount of production per lease, all of which are subject to market conditions and individual responses by public and private-sector entities;
    • Projecting bonus bids, rents, and royalties from renewable-energy leases depends on future prices of electricity and grid capacity, the number of new leases that would produce electricity, and the amount of electricity produced per lease, all of which are subject to market conditions and individual responses by public and private-sector entities;
    • Estimating bonus bids for leases in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska and the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge requires CBO to make assumptions that might differ from those of potential bidders, including our projections of long-term oil and gas prices and estimated production costs. For more information about the uncertainty of the estimates related to Alaska, see the discussion above in the section “Part III. Alaska”;
    • Anticipating market conditions and the risk tolerance of nonfederal entities make it difficult to project the amount of fees that those entities would pay for exemptions from judicial review under section 80151;
    • Projecting timelines is difficult for federally funded projects that could accelerate or newly start because of the judicial review provision; and
    • Projecting receipts from the conveyance of federal land in Nevada and Utah because of uncertain timelines, land value, and acreage.

    Pay-As-You-Go Considerations

    The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 establishes budget-reporting and enforcement procedures for legislation affecting direct spending or revenues. The net changes in outlays and revenues that are subject to those pay-as-you-go procedures are shown in Acting Chief, Natural and Physical Resources Cost Estimates Unit

    Kathleen FitzGerald
    Chief, Public and Private Mandates Unit

    Christina Hawley Anthony
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    H. Samuel Papenfuss 
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    Chad Chirico 
    Director of Budget Analysis

    Phillip L. Swagel

    Director, Congressional Budget Office

    [Table 2 begins on the next page.]

    Return to Revenues

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Subtitle A. Energy and Mineral Resources

                       

    Part I. Oil and Gas

                           

    Sec. 80101, Onshore Oil and Gas Lease Salesa

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -210

    -686

    -1,102

    -1,333

    -1,552

    -1,730

    -1,854

    -2,043

    -2,260

    -3,331

    -12,770

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -210

    -686

    -1,102

    -1,333

    -1,552

    -1,730

    -1,854

    -2,043

    -2,260

    -3,331

    -12,770

    Part II: Geothermal

                           

    Sec. 80111, Geothermal Leasingb

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -1

    -1

    -2

    -2

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -5

    -6

    -23

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -1

    -1

    -2

    -2

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -5

    -6

    -23

    Part III. Alaska

                           

    Sec. 80121, Coastal Plain Oil and Gas Leasing

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -219

    -3

    -15

    -2

    -15

    -3

    -16

    -332

    -341

    -239

    -946

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -219

    -3

    -15

    -2

    -15

    -3

    -16

    -332

    -341

    -239

    -946

    Sec. 80122, National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -80

    -5

    -90

    -6

    -95

    -11

    -97

    -34

    -114

    -181

    -532

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -80

    -5

    -90

    -6

    -95

    -11

    -97

    -34

    -114

    -181

    -532

    Part IV. Mining

                           

    Sec. 80131, Superior National Forest Lands in Minnesota

                         

    Budget Authority

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    -22

    -28

    -27

    -3

    -81

    Estimated Outlays

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    -22

    -28

    -27

    -3

    -81

    Sec. 80132, Ambler Road in Alaska

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    -4

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    -4

    Part V. Coal

                           

    Sec. 80141, Coal Leasingc

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    84

    67

    61

    57

    -107

    -101

    -98

    -99

    -101

    269

    -237

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    84

    67

    61

    57

    -107

    -101

    -98

    -99

    -101

    269

    -237

    Sec. 80144, Authorization to Mine Federal Minerals

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -14

    -15

    -14

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -42

    -42

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -14

    -15

    -14

    1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -42

    -42

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Part VI. NEPA

                           

    Sec. 80151, Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    *

    5

    15

    25

    30

    35

    40

    40

    20

    190

    Sec. 80152, Rescission Relating to Environmental and Data Collection

                         

    Budget Authority

    -25

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -25

    -25

    Estimated Outlays

    -7

    -6

    -6

    -6

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -25

    -25

    Part VII. Miscellaneous

                           

    Sec. 80161, Protest Fees

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    *

    -2

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -1

    *

    -2

    *

    -2

    -5

    Part VIII: Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing

                       

    Sec. 80171, Mandatory Offshore Oil and Gas Lease Salesd

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -160

    -170

    -530

    -390

    -540

    -800

    -1,010

    -1,240

    -1,450

    -1,250

    -6,290

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -160

    -170

    -530

    -390

    -540

    -800

    -1,010

    -1,240

    -1,450

    -1,250

    -6,290

    Sec. 80173, Limitations on Amount of Distributed Qualified Outer Continental Shelf Revenues

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    150

    140

    140

    140

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    570

    1,295

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    120

    120

    130

    140

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    510

    1,235

    Part IX: Renewable Energy

                           

    Sec. 80181, Renewable Energy Fees on Federal Landse

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -5

    -5

    -6

    -13

    -21

    -28

    -27

    -37

    -38

    -29

    -180

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -5

    -5

    -6

    -13

    -21

    -28

    -27

    -37

    -38

    -29

    -180

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Subtitle B: Water, Wildlife, and Fisheries

                       

    Sec. 80201, Rescission of Funds for Investing in Coastal Communities and Climate Resilience

                       

    Budget Authority

    -280

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -280

    -280

    Estimated Outlays

    -40

    -20

    -15

    -15

    -10

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -100

    -100

    Sec. 80202, Rescission of Funds for Facilities of National Atmospheric Administration and National Marine Sanctuaries

                       

    Budget Authority

    -29

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -29

    -29

    Estimated Outlays

    -7

    -7

    -7

    -6

    -2

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -29

    -29

    Sec. 80203, Surface Water Storage Enhancement

                           

    Budget Authority

    2,000

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    2,000

    2,000

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    31

    71

    108

    109

    209

    417

    418

    418

    219

    319

    2,000

    Sec. 80204, Water Conveyance Enhancement

                         

    Budget Authority

    500

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    25

    175

    150

    150

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    500

    500

    Subtitle C: Federal Lands

                           

    Sec. 80301, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Rock Springs Field Office, Wyoming, Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -21

    -24

    -26

    -29

    -29

    -30

    -25

    -163

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -21

    -24

    -26

    -29

    -29

    -30

    -25

    -163

    Sec. 80303, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Miles City Field Office, Montana, Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -12

    -16

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -12

    -16

    Sec. 80304, Prohibition on the Implementation of the North Dakota Resource Management Plan

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    *

    *

    -1

    *

    *

    *

    -4

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    *

    *

    -1

    *

    *

    *

    -4

    -5

    Sec. 80305, Prohibition on the Implementation of the Colorado River Valley Field Office and Grand Junction Field Office Resource Management Plans

                       

    Budget Authority

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -13

    -16

    -77

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -4

    *

    *

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -12

    -13

    -16

    -77

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Sec. 80306, Rescission of Forest Service Funds

                         

    Budget Authority

    -8

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    Estimated Outlays

    -3

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    Sec. 80307, Rescission of National Park Service and Bureau of Land Management Funds

                       

    Budget Authority

    -7

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Estimated Outlays

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -6

    -7

    Sec. 80308, Rescission of Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service Funds

                       

    Budget Authority

    -5

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -5

    -5

    Estimated Outlays

    -2

    -1

    -1

    -1

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -5

    -5

    Sec. 80309, Rescission of National Park Service Funds

                           

    Budget Authority

    -317

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -317

    -317

    Estimated Outlays

    -75

    -63

    -44

    -36

    -26

    -20

    -3

    0

    0

    0

    -244

    -267

    Sec. 80310, Celebrating America’s 250th Anniversary

                           

    Budget Authority

    190

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    190

    190

    Estimated Outlays

    15

    128

    25

    12

    10

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    190

    190

    Sec. 80311, Long-Term Contracts for the Forest Servicef

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -19

    -21

    -22

    -24

    -25

    0

    -111

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -19

    -21

    -22

    -24

    -25

    0

    -111

    Sec. 80312, Long-Term Contracts for the Bureau of Land Managementg

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    -10

    -10

    -10

    0

    -46

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -8

    -8

    -10

    -10

    -10

    0

    -46

    Sec. 80315, Bureau of Land Management Land in Nevada

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -364

    -819

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -91

    -364

    -819

    Sec. 80316, Forest Service Land in Nevada

                           

    Budget Authority

    0

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -3

    -4

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -7

    -7

    Sec. 80317, Federal Land in Utah

                         

    Budget Authority

    0

    -11

    -56

    -70

    -70

    -86

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -207

    -293

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    -11

    -56

    -70

    -70

    -86

    0

    0

    0

    0

    -207

    -293

                         

    (Continued)

    Table 2.

    Estimated Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues Under Reconciliation Recommendations Title VIII, Committee on Natural Resources, as Ordered Reported on May 6, 2025

    (Continued)

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2025-2029

    2025-2034

     

    Increases or Decreases (-) in Direct Spending

       

    Total Changes

                           

    Budget Authority

    2,018

    -575

    -835

    -1,722

    -1,748

    -2,437

    -2,698

    -3,146

    -3,835

    -4,355

    -2,862

    -19,333

    Estimated Outlays

    -122

    -521

    -659

    -1,523

    -1,504

    -2,224

    -2,254

    -2,693

    -3,377

    -4,096

    -4,329

    -18,973

     

    Increases in Revenues

       

    Sec. 80151, Project Sponsor Opt-In Fees for Environmental Reviews

                         

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

    Total Changes

                           

    Estimated Revenues

    0

    65

    130

    130

    135

    140

    140

    145

    150

    150

    460

    1,185

     

    Net Decrease in the Deficit

    From Changes in Direct Spending and Revenues

       

    Effect on the Deficit

    -122

    -586

    -789

    -1,653

    -1,639

    -2,364

    -2,394

    -2,838

    -3,527

    -4,246

    -4,789

    -20,158

    a. Includes amounts for sections 80102, 80103, 80104, and 80105.

    b. Includes amounts for section 80112.

    c. Includes amounts for sections 80142, 80143, and 80302.

    d. Includes amounts for section 80172.

    e. Includes amounts for section 80182.

    f. Includes amounts for section 80313.

    g. Includes amounts for section 80314.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Direct funding to address drought on the islands – E-001890/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001890/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Georgios Aftias (PPE)

    With its prolonged droughts and reduced rainfall, climate change is exacerbating the problem of water scarcity in Greece and wider south-eastern Europe, significantly affecting agriculture, industry and tourism, especially in areas heavily dependent on tourism and livestock farming. On the Greek islands in particular, the problem is heightened during the tourist season, when the population of these areas doubles.

    According to the European Environment Agency, around 20 % of Europe’s territory and 30 % of its population are affected by water scarcity each year. In southern Europe, up to 70 % of the population experiences water scarcity in the summer months.

    In view of the above, can the Commission answer the following:

    • 1.Will it take immediate action to finance specific measures to solve the problem?
    • 2.Will it finance projects to improve the water supply in order to alleviate the problem?
    • 3.Will it support desalination efforts to cover part of the water demand?

    Submitted: 12.5.2025

    Last updated: 19 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Carbon dioxide storage in Prinos – E-001877/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001877/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Zacharia (NI)

    In January 2025, the Commission announced that it would invest EUR 1.25 billion in cross-border infrastructure from the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF). Among the projects selected for funding was the carbon dioxide (CO2) storage project in Prinos (13.11-EL-W-M-24-Prinos CO2).

    The project will be implemented in a natural/geological oil reservoir system, with a total area of 256.86 km2, and be located in marine, undersea and land-based sites a short distance off the coasts of Kavala and Thasos. It also includes the maritime transport of CO2 from Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Greece and Italy. In accordance with Directive 2001/42/EC, a Strategic Environmental Impact Assessment should thus have been prepared first and, in particular, neighbouring countries should have received advance information under Article 7, which was not the case.

    In addition, the proposed project falls within the scope of the Seveso Directive (Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012), meaning that a safety report and emergency plans should have been drawn up. However, the project was submitted for an environmental impact assessment consultation on 25 November 2024, which was completed at a later stage and which does not even contain an adequate assessment of the geological risks present in an undersea area basically on top of the Anatolian fault line.

    Was the Commission aware of this when it included the project in the CEF, and had an adequate risk assessment been carried out?

    Submitted: 12.5.2025

    Last updated: 19 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Reviewing the IEP for the former ILVA steel plant – E-001875/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001875/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Cristina Guarda (Verts/ALE), Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE), Leoluca Orlando (Verts/ALE), Ignazio Roberto Marino (Verts/ALE)

    In May 2023, Acciaierie d’Italia requested a review of the integrated environmental permit (IEP) for the (former ILVA) plant in Taranto.

    Enshrined in the European regulatory framework for the sake of public transparency and participation, the right to access environmental information enables public oversight and plays a role in the sound management of environmental resources.

    The Aarhus Convention gives members of the public the right to access information about and to participate in decisions made about environmental matters, as well as to seek redress if these rights are not respected. In the interest of transparency in environmental matters, Directive 2003/4/EC enshrines the right to access environmental information held by public authorities, while Article 24 of Directive 2010/75/EU regulates the disclosure of IEP-related documents, ensuring that information is made available to the public for the sake of transparency and participation.

    Despite this, many documents have not been uploaded to the website of the Ministry of Environment and Energy Security[1], including the minutes of the inter-service conference, the opinions of local bodies and the National Institute of Health, the final preparatory opinion, and the monitoring and control plan.

    In light of the above:

    • 1.Given the significance of the site and its severe environmental impact, does the Commission believe the principles of transparency and disclosure should be observed?
    • 2.What action will the Commission take against the Italian State?

    Submitted: 12.5.2025

    • [1] https://va.mite.gov.it/it-IT/Oggetti/Documentazione/2038/14487.
    Last updated: 19 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: EEB and GACC sign co-operation agreements on export of meat and dairy products from Hong Kong to Mainland

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    EEB and GACC sign co-operation agreements on export of meat and dairy products from Hong Kong to Mainland 
    The Secretary for Environment and Ecology, Mr Tse Chin-wan, said, “The co-operation agreements will further facilitate food trade between Hong Kong and the Mainland, as well as the development of meat and dairy products businesses in Hong Kong. Upon implementation of the arrangements, Hong Kong-manufactured meat and dairy products meeting the requirements set out in the co-operation agreements will be allowed to be imported into the Mainland.”
     
    The co-operation agreements put in place the monitoring of food safety from the source for Hong Kong-manufactured meat and dairy products exported to the Mainland. The co-operation agreements will cover requirements for testing the sources of food raw materials and for the food manufacturers on production management, including storage and transportation of food products.
     
    Following the signing of the co-operation agreements, the Centre for Food Safety (CFS) of the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department will discuss with the GACC the operational details of the agreements. In addition, the CFS will organise seminars for the trade to help them better understand the requirements of the co-operation agreements.
    Issued at HKT 20:10

    NNNN

    CategoriesMIL-OSI

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LegCo to consider Private Columbaria (Amendment) Bill 2024

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    LegCo to consider Private Columbaria (Amendment) Bill 2024 
         The Second Reading debates on the Stablecoins Bill and the Merchant Shipping (Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships) Bill will also resume. If the Bills are supported by Members and receive their Second Reading, they will stand committed to the committee of the whole Council. After the committee of the whole Council has completed consideration of the Bills and their reports are adopted by the Council, the Bills will be set down for the Third Reading.
     
         On Members’ motions, Mr Michael Tien will move a motion on “Actively dovetailing with national and global trends and studying the reform of the curriculum framework for primary and secondary schools”. The motion is set out in Appendix 1.
     
         Mr Yiu Pak-leung will move a motion on “Reinforcing Hong Kong’s role as an international tourism hub and consolidating its position as a world-class premier tourism destination”. The motion is set out in Appendix 2. Ms Chan Yuet-ming, Ms Elizabeth Quat and Ms Joephy Chan will move separate amendments to Mr Yiu Pak-leung’s motion.
     
         During the meeting, the Chief Secretary for Administration will present “The Government Minute in response to the Report of the Public Accounts Committee No. 83 of February 2025” and address the Council.
     
         Members will also ask the Government 22 questions on various policy areas, six of which require oral replies.
     
         The agenda of the above meeting can be obtained via the LegCo Website (www.legco.gov.hkIssued at HKT 19:50

    NNNN

    CategoriesMIL-OSI

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Coast Guard responds to, investigates reported pollution in San Juan Harbor, Puerto Rico

    Source: United States Coast Guard

     

    05/19/2025 02:31 PM EDT

    Coast Guard Sector San Juan’s Incident Management team is investigating and responding to an oil discharge from a legacy pipe structure between piers 2 and 3 in San Juan Habor, Monday.   The Coast Guard is working with contracted oil spill removal organizations and local government authorities to mitigate the pollution threat and clean up recoverable product.   “The source of the oil discharge is being contained and, while contained, will allow normal port operations to continue at Piers 2 and 3 as our investigation and response efforts continue,” Lt. Cmdr. Ray Lopez, Coast Guard Sector San Juan Incident Management Division chief. “We are actively pursuing coordination and planning efforts with the San Juan Municipality, the Puerto Rico Ports Authority, the Department of Transportation and Public Works, the Department of Natural and Environmental Resources, and the Cultural Department, among other entities, to resolve this situation in the interest of protecting public health and the environment.”

    For more breaking news follow us on Twitter and Facebook.

    MIL Security OSI –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Air quality work on agenda for City Committee

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    At today’s meeting of the Inverness and Area City Committee members were given an update on the air quality work undertaken by the Council’s Environmental Health Team, including project work carried out in Primary Schools to monitor air quality and raise awareness.

    Under Part IV of the Environment Act 1995, the Council has a duty to review and assess air quality throughout Highland. The Act also requires that if an assessment of air quality indicates that an air quality objective is unlikely to be achieved, the Council must designate these areas as an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) by order.

    A detailed assessment report of air quality in the City Centre in 2014 determined a small area where the air quality objective for nitrogen dioxide was not being achieved. The Inverness City Centre AQMA was designated by order on the 9 September 2014.

    Since then, the Council has formulated an action plan for the AQMA, working with partners and stakeholders to progress actions that would improve air quality in the AQMA. The Council also expanded the air quality monitoring network in the city to track pollutant levels and quantify improvement.

    In the report presented to members, it was noted that because of improved levels of nitrogen dioxide, and following advice from the Scottish Government, the council is in the process of revoking the Inverness AQMA.

    Leader of Inverness and Area Councillor Ian Brown said: “It is a very positive reflection of the work that has been going on that the process to revoke the Inverness AGMA is due to be completed shortly so I’d like to thank everyone involved.

    “I’m particularly pleased that our Environmental Health team have been very proactive in working to carry out air quality monitoring and awareness raising projects at 15 primary schools within our area.

    “Going forward, it is important that the Inverness can continue to have clean air for the health of residents, and its reputation as a tourism destination so I’m pleased the Service will look to develop a strategy with other Council services and stakeholders and will keep our committee updated.”

    The Environmental Health Team will continue to deliver the primary school air quality education project and intend to deliver an anti-idling publicity campaign in the city centre as part of “Clean Air Day” on the 19 June 2025.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Overshooting 1.5°C: even temporary warming above globally agreed temperature limit could have permanent consequences

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Paul Dodds, Professor of Energy Systems, UCL

    Earth’s surface temperature has been 1.5°C hotter than the pre-industrial average for 21 of the last 22 months.

    The 2015 Paris agreement committed countries to keeping the global temperature increase “well below 2°C”, which is widely interpreted as an average of 1.5°C over a 30-year period. The Paris agreement has not yet failed, but recent high temperatures show how close the Earth is to crossing this critical threshold.

    Climate scientists have, using computer simulations, modelled pathways for halting climate change at internationally agreed limits. However, in recent years, many of the pathways that have been published involve exceeding 1.5°C for a few decades and removing enough greenhouse gas from the atmosphere to return Earth’s average temperature below the threshold again. Scientists call this “a temporary overshoot”.

    If human activities were to raise the global average temperature 1.6°C above the pre-industrial average, for example, then CO₂ removal, using methods ranging from habitat restoration to mechanically capturing CO₂ from the air, would be required to return warming to below 1.5°C by 2100.


    Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


    Do we really understand the consequences of “temporarily” overshooting 1.5°C? And would it even be possible to lower temperatures again?

    Faith that a temporary overshoot will be safe and practicable has justified a deliberate strategy of delaying emission cuts in the short term, some scientists warn. The dangers posed by remaining above the 1.5°C limit for a period of time have received little attention by researchers like me, who study climate change.

    To learn more, the UK government commissioned me and a team of 36 other scientists to examine the possible impacts.

    How nature will be affected

    We examined a “delayed action” scenario, in which greenhouse gas emissions remain similar for the next 15 years due to continued fossil fuel burning but then fall rapidly over a period of 20 years.

    We projected that this would cause the rise in Earth’s temperature to peak at 1.9°C in 2060, before falling to 1.5°C in 2100 as greenhouse gases are removed from the atmosphere. We compared this scenario with a baseline scenario in which the global temperature does not exceed 1.5°C of warming this century.

    Our Earth system model suggested that Arctic temperatures would be up to 4°C higher in 2060 compared to the baseline scenario. Arctic Sea ice loss would be much higher. Even after the global average temperature was returned to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, in 2100, the Arctic would remain around 1.5°C warmer compared to the baseline scenario. This suggests there are long-term and potentially irreversible consequences for the climate in overshooting 1.5°C.

    Temperature increases caused by overshooting 1.5°C are primarily felt in the Arctic and on land.
    Selena Zhang, Maria Russo, Luke Abraham and Alex Archibald.

    As global warming approaches 2°C, warm-water corals, Arctic permafrost, Barents Sea ice and mountain glaciers could reach tipping points at which substantial and irreversible changes occur. Some scientists have concluded that the west Antarctic ice sheet may have already started melting irreversibly.

    Our modelling showed that the risk of catastrophic wildfires is substantially higher during a temporary overshoot that culminates in 1.9°C of warming, particularly in regions already vulnerable to wildfires. Fires in California in early 2025 are an example of what is possible when the global temperature is higher.

    Our analysis showed that the risk of species going extinct at 2°C of warming is double that at 1.5°C. Insects are most at risk because they are less able to move between regions in response to the changing climate than larger mammals and birds.

    The impacts on society

    Only armed conflict is considered by experts to have a greater impact on society than extreme weather. Forecasting how extreme weather will be affected by climate change is challenging. Scientists expect more intense storms, floods and droughts, but not necessarily in places that already regularly suffer these extremes.

    In some places, moderate floods may reduce in size while larger, more extreme events occur more often and cause more damage. We are confident that the sea level would rise faster in a temporary overshoot scenario, and further increase the risk of flooding. We also expect more extreme floods and droughts, and for them to cause more damage to water and sanitation systems.

    Floods and droughts will affect food production too. We found that impact studies have probably underestimated the crop damage that increases in extreme weather and water scarcity in key production areas during a temporary overshoot would cause.

    We know that heatwaves become more frequent and intense as temperatures increase. More scarce food and water would increase the health risks of heat exposure beyond 1.5°C. It is particularly difficult to estimate the overall impact of overshooting this temperature limit when several impacts reinforce each other in this way.

    In fact, most alarming of all is how uncertain much of our knowledge is.

    For example, we have little confidence in estimates of how climate change will affect the economy. Some academics use models to predict how crops and other economic assets will be affected by climate change; others infer what will happen by projecting real-word economic losses to date into future warming scenarios. For 3°C of warming, estimates of the annual impact on GDP using models range from -5% to +3% each year, but up to -55% using the latter approach.

    We have not managed to reconcile the differences between these methods. The highest estimates account for changes in extreme weather due to climate change, which are particularly difficult to determine.

    We carried out an economic analysis using estimates of climate damage from both models and observed climate-related losses. We found that temporarily overshooting 1.5°C would reduce global GDP compared with not overshooting it, even if economic damages were lower than we expect. The economic consequences for the global economy could be profound.

    So, what can we say for certain? First, that temporarily overshooting 1.5°C would be more costly to society and to the natural world than not overshooting it. Second, our projections are relatively conservative. It is likely that impacts would be worse, and possibly much worse, than we estimate.

    Fundamentally, every increment of global temperature rise will worsen impacts on us and the rest of the natural world. We should aim to minimise global warming as much as possible, rather than focus on a particular target.


    Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

    Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 45,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.


    Paul Dodds has received funding from the UK government through the Climate Services for a Net Zero World (CS-N0W) programme. While the UK government set the research questions for the study, it was carried out independently by scientists from nine organisations. Dodds has also received funding for other research projects from a range of organisations, including UK Research and Innovation organisations (Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council and the Natural Environment Research Council); the IEA Energy Technology Systems Analysis Program (ETSAP); and private organisations (National Grid; Fuels Industry UK; Johnson Matthey; Cadent). A team at UCL led by Paul Dodds jointly develops the UK TIMES energy system model in a partnership with the UK government. This model was not used in this study.

    – ref. Overshooting 1.5°C: even temporary warming above globally agreed temperature limit could have permanent consequences – https://theconversation.com/overshooting-1-5-c-even-temporary-warming-above-globally-agreed-temperature-limit-could-have-permanent-consequences-255523

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: SPC Tornado Watch 292 Status Reports

    Source: US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

    Search by city or zip code. Press enter or select the go button to submit request
    Local forecast by”City, St” or “ZIP” 

    SPC on Facebook

    @NWSSPC

    NCEP Quarterly Newsletter

    Home (Classic)SPC Products   All SPC Forecasts   Current Watches   Meso. Discussions   Conv. Outlooks   Tstm. Outlooks   Fire Wx Outlooks     RSS Feeds   E-Mail AlertsWeather Information   Storm Reports   Storm Reports Dev.   NWS Hazards Map   National RADAR   Product Archive   NOAA Weather RadioResearch   Non-op. Products   Forecast Tools   Svr. Tstm. Events   SPC Publications   SPC-NSSL HWTEducation & Outreach   About the SPC   SPC FAQ   About Tornadoes   About Derechos   Video Lecture Series   WCM Page   Enh. Fujita Page   Our History   Public ToursMisc.   StaffContact Us   SPC Feedback

    Watch 292 Status Reports

    Watch 292 Status Message has not been issued yet.

    Top/Watch Issuance Text for Watch 292/All Current Watches/Forecast Products/Home

    Weather Topics:Watches, Mesoscale Discussions, Outlooks, Fire Weather, All Products, Contact Us

    NOAA / National Weather ServiceNational Centers for Environmental PredictionStorm Prediction Center120 David L. Boren Blvd.Norman, OK 73072 U.S.A.spc.feedback@noaa.govPage last modified: May 19, 2025
    DisclaimerInformation QualityHelpGlossary
    Privacy PolicyFreedom of Information Act (FOIA)About UsCareer Opportunities

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Financing biodiversity key for realising Africa’s economic potential

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Deputy Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Narend Singh has called on delegates from governments across the continent to innovatively think about financing biodiversity, beyond the traditional funding from national budgets.

    According to the Deputy Minister, more than 7 000 species across the continent face extinction, which could harm Africa’s economic potential.

    “Biodiversity is not a luxury; it is the foundation of our economies, our health, and our survival. As you are aware that the financing gap to halt and reverse biodiversity loss by 2030 from all sources is estimated at 200 billion US Dollars annually. 

    “Every hectare of forest cleared, every waterway polluted, and every species lost diminishes not just our ecological wealth, but our economic potential,” Singh said on Monday in Cape Town.

    He was addressing the regional dialogue for member States of the Southern African Development Community, the East African Community and other Anglophone countries on the update or revision of national and regional biodiversity strategies and action plans (NBSAPs).

    This regional dialogue offers an opportunity for countries that have already revised their NBSAPs to share good practices, address common challenges, and identify potential solutions.

    The goal of the NBSAP is to conserve and manage biodiversity to ensure sustainable benefits to the people of South Africa, through co-operation and partnerships that build on strengths and opportunities.

    “Strong NBSAPs are more than policy, they are strategic tools to unlock international finance, attract private investment, and guide public spending where it matters most. But a plan on paper is not enough – it must be matched by budgets and political commitment,” he said.

    The Deputy Minister offered insights into the innovative finance solutions that were developed in South Africa through the Biodiversity Finance Initiative (BIOFIN) programme.

    The BIOFIN programme supports countries to enhance their financial management of biodiversity and ecosystems.

    “Through the BIOFIN programme, a framework has been developed to guide a fee setting process for biodiversity permits, which enables cost recovery and value attribution to the natural resources. 

    “The basis for this work is that revenue from sources such as protected area gate fees, tourism concessions, conferencing facilities, fees and permits related to biodiversity can play an important role in supporting the financial sustainability of the conservation estate,” he said.

    Through the programme, some municipalities have given rates relief to conservation areas leading to funds saved which can be further invested into biodiversity conservation. 

    “The financial result of this has been 124 000.00 US dollars saved by conservation areas over the last three years. We were delighted to learn from the Botswana example, where their rate collection increased seven-fold,” Singh said.

    A biodiversity offset portal will be launched on 22 May 2025 as part of celebrating the International Day of Biodiversity. 

    The offset portal which will be publicly accessible is aimed at improving the way offsets are conducted for the benefit of funding protected area management.

    “The Biodiversity Sector investment portal was launched in 2022 and formally handed over to the Government of South Africa. The portal has been institutionalized within the department and established a Biodiversity Economy Investment Portal, officially recognised as an ongoing conduit of opportunities for investment in the Small and Medium Enterprises. The department has fully taken over the portal and allocated a budget towards its ongoing maintenance,” he said. –SANews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Governors are leading the fight against climate change and deforestation around the world, filling a void left by presidents

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Mary Nichols, Distinguished Counsel for the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, University of California, Los Angeles

    Forests like the Amazon play vital roles in balancing the environment, from storing carbon to releasing oxygen. Silvestre Garcia-IntuitivoFilms/Stone/Getty Images

    When the annual U.N. climate conference descends on the small Brazilian rainforest city of Belém in November 2025, it will be tempting to focus on the drama and disunity among major nations. Only 21 countries had even submitted their updated plans for managing climate change by the 2025 deadline required under the Paris Agreement. The U.S. is pulling out of the agreement altogether.

    Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, Chinese President Xi Jinping and the likely absence of – or potential stonewalling by – a U.S. delegation will take up much of the oxygen in the negotiating hall.

    You can tune them out.

    Trust me, I’ve been there. As chair of the California Air Resources Board for nearly 20 years, I attended the annual conferences from Bali in 2007 to Sharm el Sheikh, Egypt, in 2023. That included the exhilarating success in 2015, when nearly 200 nations committed to keep global warming in check by signing the Paris Agreement.

    In recent years, however, the real progress has been outside the rooms where the official U.N. negotiations are held, not inside. In these meetings, the leaders of states and provinces talk about what they are doing to reduce greenhouse gases and prepare for worsening climate disasters. Many bilateral and multilateral agreements have sprung up like mushrooms from these side conversations.

    This week, for example, the leaders of several state-level governments are meeting in Brazil to discuss ways to protect tropical rainforests that restore ecosystems while creating jobs and boosting local economies.

    What states and provinces are doing now

    The real action in 2025 will come from the leaders of states and provinces, places like Pastaza, Ecuador; Acre and Pará, Brazil; and East Kalimantan, Indonesia.

    While some national political leaders are backing off their climate commitments, these subnational governments know they have to live with increasing fires, floods and deadly heat waves. So, they’re stepping up and sharing advice for what works.

    State, province and local governments often have jurisdiction over energy generation, land-use planning, housing policies and waste management, all of which play a role in increasing or reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

    Their leaders have been finding ways to use that authority to reduce deforestation, increase the use of renewable energy and cap and cut greenhouse gas emissions that are pushing the planet toward dangerous tipping points. They have teamed up to link carbon markets and share knowledge in many areas.

    In the U.S., governors are working together in the U.S. Climate Alliance to fill the vacuum left by the Trump administration’s efforts to dismantle U.S. climate policies and programs. Despite intense pressure from fossil fuel industry lobbyists, the governors of 22 states and two territories are creating policies that take steps to reduce emissions from buildings, power generation and transportation. Together, they represent more than half the U.S. population and nearly 60% of its economy.

    Tactics for fighting deforestation

    In Ecuador, provinces like Morona Santiago, Pastaza, and Zamora Chinchipe are designing management and financing partnerships with Indigenous territories for protecting more than 4 million hectares of forests through a unique collaboration called the Plataforma Amazonica.

    Brazilian states, including Mato Grosso, have been using remote-sensing technologies to crack down on illegal land clearing, while states like Amapá and Amazonas are developing community-engaged bioeconomy plans – think increased jobs through sustainable local fisheries and producing super fruits like acaí. Acre, Pará and Tocantins have programs that allow communities to sell carbon credits for forest preservation to companies.

    Global Forest Watch uses satellite data to track forest cover change. Green shows areas with at least 30% forest cover in 2000. Pink is forest loss from 2003-2023. Blue is forest gain from 2000 to 2020.
    Global Forest Watch, CC BY

    States in Mexico, including Jalisco, Yucatán and Oaxaca, have developed sustainable supply chain certification programs to help reduce deforestation. Programs like these can increase the economic value in some of foods and beverages, from avocados to honey to agave for tequila.

    There are real signs of success: Deforestation has dropped significantly in Indonesia compared with previous decades, thanks in large part to provincially led sustainable forest management efforts. In East Kalimantan, officials have been pursuing policy reforms and working with plantation and forestry companies to reduce forests destruction to protect habitat for orangutans.

    It’s no wonder that philanthropic and business leaders from many sectors are turning to state and provincial policymakers, rather than national governments. These subnational governments have the ability to take timely and effective action.

    Working together to find solutions

    Backing many of these efforts to slow deforestation is the Governors’ Climate and Forests Task Force, which California’s then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger helped launch in 2008. It is the world’s only subnational governmental network dedicated to protecting forests, reducing emissions and making people’s lives better across the tropics.

    Today, the task force includes 43 states and provinces from 11 countries. They cover more than one-third of the world’s tropical forests. That includes all of Brazil’s Legal Amazon region, more than 85% of the Peruvian Amazon, 65% of Mexico’s tropical forests and over 60% of Indonesia’s forests.

    From a purely environmental perspective, subnational governments and governors must balance competing interests that do not always align with environmentalists’ ideals. Pará state, for example, is building an 8-mile (13 kilometer) road to ease traffic that cuts through rainforest. California’s investments in its Lithium Valley, where lithium used to make batteries is being extracted near the Salton Sea, may result in economic benefits within California and the U.S., while also generating potential environmental risks to air and water quality.

    Each governor has to balance the needs of farmers, ranchers and other industries with protecting the forests and other ecosystems, but those in the task force are finding pragmatic solutions.

    Pará State Gov. Helder Barbalho arrives for the Amazon Summit in August 2023. Eight South American countries agreed to launch an alliance to fight deforestation in the Amazon at the meeting.
    Evaristo SA / AFP via Getty Images

    The week of May 19-23, 2025, two dozen or more subnational leaders from Brazil, Mexico, Peru, Indonesia and elsewhere are gathering in Rio Branco, Brazil, for a conference on protecting tropical rainforests. They’ll also be ironing out some important details for developing what they call a “new forest economy” for protecting and restoring ecosystems while creating jobs and boosting economies.

    Protecting tropical forest habitat while also creating jobs and economic opportunities is not easy. In 2023, data show the planet was losing rainforest equivalent to 10 soccer fields a minute, and had lost more than 7% since 2000.

    But states and cities are taking big steps while many national governments can’t even agree on which direction to head. It’s time to pay attention more to the states.

    Mary Nichols is affiliated with the Emmett Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, which cosponsors the Governors’ Climate and Forests Task Force.

    – ref. Governors are leading the fight against climate change and deforestation around the world, filling a void left by presidents – https://theconversation.com/governors-are-leading-the-fight-against-climate-change-and-deforestation-around-the-world-filling-a-void-left-by-presidents-256988

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: 19 May 2025 News release WHO validates Mauritania for eliminating trachoma as a public health problem

    Source: World Health Organisation

    The World Health Organization (WHO) has validated Mauritania as having eliminated trachoma as a public health problem, making it the seventh country in WHO’s African Region to achieve this significant milestone. The validation certificate was received by Honorable Abdallahi Sidi Mohamed Wedih, Minister of Health and Aïcha Vall Vergès, Ambassador of Mauritania to Switzerland at the Seventy-eighth World Health Assembly.

    “I congratulate the government and the people of Mauritania for this achievement,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. “This is another example of the incredible progress we have made against neglected tropical diseases and gives hope to many other nations still fighting against trachoma that they too can eliminate this disease.”

    Mauritania has a long history of a fight against trachoma that dates back to the 1960s. However, it was not until early 2000 that the country conducted population-based epidemiological surveys to map trachoma with the support of the Organization for the Prevention of Blindness (OPC), the Institute of Tropical Ophthalmology of Africa (IOTA) and WHO. Trachoma control activities were integrated into the National Programme for the Fight against Blindness at the Ministry of Health.

    Mauritania implemented the WHO-recommended SAFE strategy to eliminate trachoma with the support of partners. These activities included provision of surgery to treat the late blinding stage of the disease, conducting mass administration of antibiotic treatment with azithromycin donated by Pfizer through the International Trachoma Initiative, carrying out public awareness campaigns to promote facial cleanliness and personal hygiene as well as improvement in access to water supply and sanitation.

    “Eliminating trachoma is a landmark victory for public health in Mauritania,” said Dr Charlotte Faty Ndiaye, WHO Representative in Mauritania. “This success reflects the strong leadership and commitment of the Government, supported by the dedication of health workers, communities, and partners, with the guidance and support of WHO. We will remain vigilant and support the country to preserve this success and protect those most at risk from trachoma.”

    Trachoma is the second neglected tropical disease to be eliminated in Mauritania. In 2009, the country had already been certified free of dracunculiasis (Guinea-worm disease) transmission. Globally, Mauritania joins 21 other countries that have been validated by WHO for having eliminated trachoma as a public health problem. These are Benin, Cambodia, China, Ghana, India, Iraq, Islamic Republic of Iran, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malawi, Mali, Mexico, Morocco, Myanmar, Nepal, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Gambia, Togo, Vanuatu and Viet Nam. These countries are part of a wider group of 55 countries that have eliminated one or more neglected tropical diseases.

    WHO is supporting Mauritania’s health authorities to closely monitor communities where trachoma was previously endemic to ensure there is no resurgence of the disease.

    Disease prevalence

    As of April 2024, trachoma remains a public health problem in 37 countries with an estimated 103 million people living in areas requiring interventions against the disease. Trachoma is found mainly in the poorest and most rural areas of Africa, Central and South America, Asia, the Western Pacific and the Middle East. The African Region is disproportionately affected by trachoma with 93 million people living in at-risk areas in April 2024, representing 90% of the global trachoma burden.

    Significant progress has been made in the fight against trachoma over the past few years and the number of people requiring antibiotic treatment for trachoma in the African Region fell by 96 million from 189 million in 2014 to 93 million as of April 2024, representing a 51% reduction.

    Following Mauritania’s success, there are now 20 countries in WHO’s African Region that are targeting trachoma elimination.
     

    Note to editors

    Trachoma is a neglected tropical disease. It is caused by infection with the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis, which spreads from person to person through contaminated fingers, fomites and flies that have come into contact with discharge from the eyes or nose of an infected person. Environmental risk factors for trachoma transmission include poor hygiene, overcrowded households, and inadequate access to water and sanitation.

    Elimination of trachoma as a public health problem is defined as: (i) a prevalence of trachomatous trichiasis “unknown to the health system” of <0.2% in adults aged ≥15 years (approximately 1 case per 1000 total population), and (ii) a prevalence of trachomatous inflammation – follicular in children aged 1–9 years of <5%, sustained for at least two years in the absence of ongoing antibiotic mass treatment, in each formerly endemic district; plus (iii) the existence of a system able to identify and manage incident trachomatous trichiasis cases, using defined strategies, with evidence of appropriate financial resources to implement those strategies.

    To eliminate trachoma as a public health problem, WHO recommends the SAFE strategy: a comprehensive approach to reduce transmission of the causative organism, clear existing infections and deal with their effects.

    The road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030 targets the prevention, control, elimination or eradication of 20 diseases and disease groups. Progress against trachoma and other neglected tropical diseases alleviates the human and economic burden that they impose on the world’s most disadvantaged communities.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Powering the Future with Forests: A Roadmap to a Circular Bioeconomy

    Source: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

    Launch of the ECE/FAO Publication
    “Sustainable and Circular Bioeconomy in Forest-based Industries: How to Get There”

    📅 10 June 2025 | 🕒 15:00–16:00 CEST | 📍Online

    Background

    As the world shifts toward more sustainable, resource-efficient economic models, the forest sector stands out as a vital enabler of this transition. Forests provide a renewable source of raw materials that and forest-based industries can play a critical role in reducing dependence on fossil-based resources and promoting nature-based solutions across a wide range of industries—from construction and packaging to textiles and chemicals.

    The bioeconomy, when grounded in sustainable forest management and driven by circularity, offers an opportunity to decouple economic growth from environmental degradation while supporting rural development, innovation, and green job creation supporting societies to meet climate goals and shift toward more sustainable and resource-efficient economic models.

    ***

    Recognizing this opportunity, the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) have jointly worked on a publication: “Sustainable and Circular Bioeconomy in Forest-based Industries: How to Get There.” The publication explores pathways and actionable recommendations for advancing a sustainable, circular bioeconomy in the forest-based industries, while highlighting good practices, enabling conditions, and innovation trends across the forest-based value chains.

    Objective

    The event will serve to provide a platform for discussion among stakeholders on strategies for advancing circularity and sustainability in forest sectors. It will present key insights from the publication and showcase UNECE and FAO’s ongoing work on bioeconomy and forest-based industries.

    Target Audience

    The event is open to all stakeholders interested in forestry, sustainability, circular economy, and bioeconomy— including policymakers, industry representatives, researchers, NGOs, and international organizations.

     

     

    Tentative Programme (75 min total)

    Moderator:
    Dominique Burgeon, Director, Liaison Officer, FAO Liaison Office in Geneva

    Opening Remarks

    • Paola Deda, Director, Forests, Land and Housing Division, UNECE (5 minutes)
    • Zhimin Wu, Director, Forestry Division, FAO (5 minutes)

    UNECE and FAO Work on Bioeconomy

    • Florian Steierer, Economic Affairs Officer, Forests and Bioeconomy Section, UNECE (10 minutes)
    • Sven Walter, Chief, Forest Products and Bioeconomy Section, Forestry Division, FAO (10 minutes)
    • Lev Neretin, Senior Natural Resources Officer, Office for Climate Change, Biodiversity and Environment, FAO (10 minutes)

    Presentation of the Publication

    • Kathryn Fernholz, Dovetail Partners Lead author of the UNECE/FAO publication: “Sustainable and Circular Bioeconomy in Forest-based Industries: How to Get There.” (15 minutes)

    Q&A Session (15 minutes)

    Closing Remarks

    • Raschad Al-Khafaji, Director, FAO Liaison Office with the European Union and Belgium (5 minutes)

     

     

     

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Gosar Statement Regarding EPA’s Approval of Arizona’s Primacy Application for All Underground Injection Wells 

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Paul A Gosar DDS (AZ-04)

    Washington, D.C. — Congressman Paul A. Gosar, D.D.S. (AZ-09), issued the following statement after participating in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) announcement ceremony to approve the State of Arizona’s request to oversee Safe Drinking Water Act permitting for all underground injection wells in the state:

    “After years of the Biden Administration dragging its feet and delaying approvals of more than 150 applications for underground injection wells, including in my great state of Arizona, President Trump and EPA Administrator Zeldin are taking swift action.

    Under the Trump Administration, the EPA has moved quickly to review and approve long-delayed projects. The approval of this project recognizes that Arizona is well-positioned to protect its underground sources of drinking water and will provide much-needed certainty to the fast-growing carbon capture industry while maintaining America’s leadership in deploying these technologies. 

    President Trump and EPA Administrator Zeldin are advancing conservation and environmental stewardship while promoting economic growth for families in Arizona and all across America.

    Today’s approval is yet another example of the Trump Administration’s efforts to achieve U.S. energy dominance and fulfill its promise of “Powering the Great American Comeback,” concluded Congressman Paul Gosar.

    “Advancing economic growth and energy production in the United States, while safeguarding water resources, are common sense priorities to Power the Great American Comeback,” added EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. “With this proposal, we are advancing cooperative federalism and supporting energy dominance as Arizona becomes the primary regulator of underground injection wells within their state.” 

    Background:

    After conducting a comprehensive technical and legal review, EPA has preliminarily determined that Arizona’s UIC program meets all requirements for approval and the state will implement and enforce a UIC program consistent with the Safe Drinking Water Act. EPA is requesting public comments on the Agency’s proposed decision within 45 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register. 

    The EPA will hold a virtual public hearing on June 25, 2025, from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. Mountain Standard Time (MST). Registration for the hearing is available here. 

    Visit EPA’s Underground Injection Control (UIC) website for more information. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Ukrainian demining personnel trained with OSCE and EU support

    Source: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe – OSCE

    Headline: Ukrainian demining personnel trained with OSCE and EU support

    Ukrainian specialists are practicing their skills in the disposal of explosive objects during a mine action training course supported by the OSCE and the EU. (Fabian Kaluza / OSCE) Photo details

    Seventeen representatives from Ukraine’s demining agencies underwent a two-and-a-half month training to obtain an international qualification in explosive ordnance disposal. Organized by the OSCE Support Programme for Ukraine with support from the European Union, the training programme concluded on 18 May and included a combination of theoretical and practical exercises in line with the International Mine Action Standards (IMAS).
    Experienced demining practitioners from the Ministry of Defense, the State Emergency Service, and the National Police participated in the training, enhancing their skills in safely disposing of explosive remnants of war such as mines, shells and unexploded or abandoned ordnance.
    “These experts already have significant and diverse professional experience obtained on the ground here in Ukraine. This blend of local expertise and international standards will contribute to improving the work of Ukrainian agencies in clearing lands from explosive remnants of war. It will help make the process more efficient and safer – both for deminers and people in the affected areas,” said Ambassador Petr Mares, the Special Representative of the OSCE Chairmanship – Project Co-ordinator in Ukraine.
    The training provided in-depth knowledge of safe demining protocols, and hands-on exercises with a variety of explosive objects such as booby-traps. Trainees also learned how to properly organize and monitor the disposal process to ensure safety, prevent damage to third-party property and minimize environmental impact. As most of participants are team leaders or trainers themselves, they will also share the knowledge with colleagues.
    “We recognize that the most important asset in mine action is the people who will carry out the work of demining in the field. This training is essential for state mine action operators to carry out their vital role in Ukraine’s reconstruction and recovery,” said Arturo Rodriguez Tonelli, Regional Programme Manager EU Service for Foreign Policy Instruments (FPI).    
    “This course is an important step forward for me and my colleagues. We not only got in-depth knowledge, but also expanded our horizons on how to plan and conduct operations at a higher and more complex level. Special attention to issues of safety gave us a new professional set of tools to act effectively and responsibly,” said Oleksandr Kyseliov, an instructor from Vinnytsia Professional Training School of Lviv University of Life Safety who participated in the course.
    Since the start of full-scale war in 2022, demining operators had to discover and destroy over 920,000 explosive objects in a country with 139,000 square kilometers with suspected contamination according to the National Mine Action Authority of Ukraine.  
    The training is part of the project “Support to Environmental Rehabilitation with Focus on Building National Humanitarian Mine Action Capacities of Ukraine”, implemented with primary financial support of the European Union and contributions from the OSCE participating States and partners. See full list of the Programme’s donors.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Westminster Council recognises Prince Charles Cinema as an Asset of Community Value | Westminster City Council

    Source: City of Westminster

    Westminster City Council has recognised the importance of the Prince Charles Cinema to the local area by making it an asset of community value.   

    The Prince Charles Cinema is one of the last independent cinemas operating in the West End and has been a staple in the area since opening in 1962.   

     A letter announcing the news from the council states how the cinema supports local filmmakers by providing platform for independent works and hosting film festivals.  

     It has also been a hosting venue for the BFI London Film Festival since 2016, and also participated in festivals from China, Czechia, the Philippines, Poland, Romania and Ukraine. including a partnership with the National Film & Television School.  

     The cinema is known for its eclectic programming, which includes cult classics, independent films, and international cinema and attracts over 250,000 visitors annually. In January 2025 alone, 155 films featured in its programme, a figure that far outstrips the choice offered by any other cinema in the country.  

     Cllr Geoff Barraclough, Westminster City Council Cabinet Member for Planning and Economic Development, said:       

    “The Prince Charles isn’t just a cinema—it’s a cultural landmark and a meeting place for film lovers of all kinds. Designating the Prince Charles as an asset of community value helps protect that spirit and keeps the reels turning for the next generation. We’re proud to back a venue that brings so much life, character, and cinematic adventure to the West End.” 

    Cllr Ryan Jude, Westminster City Council Cabinet Member for Climate, Ecology and Culture, said:  

     “This iconic cinema has long been a treasured part of our cultural landscape, championing independent voices, global stories, and community spirt. With its unique programming and support for local filmmakers, it plays a crucial role in nurturing creativity, diversity, and culture in the heart of Westminster.” 

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: 19 May 2025 News release WHO certifies Mauritania for eliminating trachoma as a public health problem

    Source: World Health Organisation

    The World Health Organization (WHO) has validated Mauritania as having eliminated trachoma as a public health problem, making it the seventh country in WHO’s African Region to achieve this significant milestone. The certification was received by Honorable Abdallahi Sidi Mohamed Wedih, Minister of Health and Aïcha Vall Vergès, Ambassador of Mauritania to Switzerland at the Seventy-eighth World Health Assembly.

    “I congratulate the government and the people of Mauritania for this achievement,” said Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General. “This is another example of the incredible progress we have made against neglected tropical diseases and gives hope to many other nations still fighting against trachoma that they too can eliminate this disease.”

    Mauritania has a long history of a fight against trachoma that dates back to the 1960s. However, it was not until early 2000 that the country conducted population-based epidemiological surveys to map trachoma with the support of the Organization for the Prevention of Blindness (OPC), the Institute of Tropical Ophthalmology of Africa (IOTA) and WHO. Trachoma control activities were integrated into the National Programme for the Fight against Blindness at the Ministry of Health.

    Mauritania implemented the WHO-recommended SAFE strategy to eliminate trachoma with the support of partners. These activities included provision of surgery to treat the late blinding stage of the disease, conducting mass administration of antibiotic treatment with azithromycin donated by Pfizer through the International Trachoma Initiative, carrying out public awareness campaigns to promote facial cleanliness and personal hygiene as well as improvement in access to water supply and sanitation.

    “Eliminating trachoma is a landmark victory for public health in Mauritania,” said Dr Charlotte Faty Ndiaye, WHO Representative in Mauritania. “This success reflects the strong leadership and commitment of the Government, supported by the dedication of health workers, communities, and partners, with the guidance and support of WHO. We will remain vigilant and support the country to preserve this success and protect those most at risk from trachoma.”

    Trachoma is the second neglected tropical disease to be eliminated in Mauritania. In 2009, the country had already been certified free of dracunculiasis (Guinea-worm disease) transmission. Globally, Mauritania joins 21 other countries that have been validated by WHO for having eliminated trachoma as a public health problem. These are Benin, Cambodia, China, Ghana, India, Iraq, Islamic Republic of Iran, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malawi, Mali, Mexico, Morocco, Myanmar, Nepal, Oman, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Gambia, Togo, Vanuatu and Viet Nam. These countries are part of a wider group of 55 countries that have eliminated one or more neglected tropical diseases.

    WHO is supporting Mauritania’s health authorities to closely monitor communities where trachoma was previously endemic to ensure there is no resurgence of the disease.

    Disease prevalence

    As of April 2024, trachoma remains a public health problem in 37 countries with an estimated 103 million people living in areas requiring interventions against the disease. Trachoma is found mainly in the poorest and most rural areas of Africa, Central and South America, Asia, the Western Pacific and the Middle East. The African Region is disproportionately affected by trachoma with 93 million people living in at-risk areas in April 2024, representing 90% of the global trachoma burden.

    Significant progress has been made in the fight against trachoma over the past few years and the number of people requiring antibiotic treatment for trachoma in the African Region fell by 96 million from 189 million in 2014 to 93 million as of April 2024, representing a 51% reduction.

    Following Mauritania’s success, there are now 20 countries in WHO’s African Region that are targeting trachoma elimination.
     

    Note to editors

    Trachoma is a neglected tropical disease. It is caused by infection with the bacterium Chlamydia trachomatis, which spreads from person to person through contaminated fingers, fomites and flies that have come into contact with discharge from the eyes or nose of an infected person. Environmental risk factors for trachoma transmission include poor hygiene, overcrowded households, and inadequate access to water and sanitation.

    Elimination of trachoma as a public health problem is defined as: (i) a prevalence of trachomatous trichiasis “unknown to the health system” of <0.2% in adults aged ≥15 years (approximately 1 case per 1000 total population), and (ii) a prevalence of trachomatous inflammation – follicular in children aged 1–9 years of <5%, sustained for at least two years in the absence of ongoing antibiotic mass treatment, in each formerly endemic district; plus (iii) the existence of a system able to identify and manage incident trachomatous trichiasis cases, using defined strategies, with evidence of appropriate financial resources to implement those strategies.

    To eliminate trachoma as a public health problem, WHO recommends the SAFE strategy: a comprehensive approach to reduce transmission of the causative organism, clear existing infections and deal with their effects.

    The road map for neglected tropical diseases 2021–2030 targets the prevention, control, elimination or eradication of 20 diseases and disease groups. Progress against trachoma and other neglected tropical diseases alleviates the human and economic burden that they impose on the world’s most disadvantaged communities.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: WASHINGTON COUNTY – Lt. Gov. Austin Davis to Highlight Shapiro-Davis Administration’s Investments to Create More Jobs and Build Shovel-Ready Sites for Businesses

    Source: US State of Pennsylvania

    May 19, 2025 – Monongahela, PA

    ADVISORY – WASHINGTON COUNTY – Lt. Gov. Austin Davis to Highlight Shapiro-Davis Administration’s Investments to Create More Jobs and Build Shovel-Ready Sites for Businesses

    Lt. Gov. Austin Davis and state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Acting Secretary Jessica Shirley will join state and local leaders and economic development officials for a news conference to highlight investments by the Shapiro-Davis Administration to create more jobs and build shovel-ready sites for businesses Monday, May 19, at 1:30 p.m. at 462 Cracker Jack Rd., Monongahela, PA 15063.

    The Shapiro-Davis Administration is delivering a $250,000 planning grant to the Mon Valley Alliance through the first round of the PA SITES (Pennsylvania Strategic Investments to Enhance Sites) program.

    WHO: Lt. Gov. Austin Davis, DEP Acting Secretary Jessica Shirley, state Sen. Camera Bartolotta, Carroll Township Supervisor Ken Hillman, Fallowfield Township Supervisor Bruce Smith, representatives from the Mon Valley Alliance

    WHAT:
    News conference to highlight investments by the Shapiro-Davis Administration to create more jobs and build shovel-ready sites for businesses

    WHEN:
    Monday, May 19, at 1:30 p.m.

    WHERE:
    462 Cracker Jack Rd.,
    Monongahela, PA 15063

    RSVP:
    Members of the news media who are interested in attending must RSVP to Kirstin Alvanitakis at kirstinalv@pa.gov to receive logistical details.

    Attendees must also complete and submit a waiver.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Food pacts signed with Mainland

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    The Environment & Ecology Bureau and the General Administration of Customs (GACC) today signed two operation agreements on meat and dairy products exported to the Mainland, facilitating food trade between Hong Kong and the Mainland.

    Secretary for Environment & Ecology Tse Chin-wan said the Memorandum of Understanding on the Inspection, Quarantine & Hygiene Requirements for Meat Products Exported from Hong Kong to the Mainland, and the Cooperation Arrangement for the Export of Dairy Products from Hong Kong to the Mainland, will further facilitate bilateral food trade and the development of meat and dairy products businesses in Hong Kong.

    “Upon implementation of the arrangements, Hong Kong-manufactured meat and dairy products meeting the requirements set out in the co-operation agreements will be allowed to be imported into the Mainland.”

    The two agreements put in place the monitoring of food safety from the source for Hong Kong-manufactured meat and dairy products exported to the Mainland. They will cover requirements for testing the sources of food raw materials and food manufacturers on production management, including storage and transportation of food products.

    The Centre for Food Safety will discuss with the GACC the operational details of the agreements. The centre will also organise seminars to help the trade better understand the requirements of the agreements.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Government to launch £360m Fishing and Coastal Growth Fund

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Government to launch £360m Fishing and Coastal Growth Fund

    A major investment will modernise Britain’s fishing fleet, enhance workforce skills, and revitalise coastal communities to boost tourism.

    British fishing and coastal communities will benefit from £360 million investment to drive growth and boost the sector for the future as the Government launches its Fishing and Coastal Growth Fund.  

    The Fund will invest in new technology and equipment to modernise Britain’s fishing fleet, deliver new training and skills to back the next generation of fishers and promote the seafood sector to export our high-quality produce across the world. The government will work with the industry to target investment where it matters most.

    The investment comes alongside a new twelve-year fisheries access agreement with the EU securing long-term certainty for British fishing fleets. The deal protects Britain’s fishing access, fishing rights and fishing areas. As a result, there is no change to current access for coastal communities and no reduction in British quota or increase in the quota the EU is allowed to catch.  

    The Government has also secured a new SPS Agreement that will slash red tape for UK seafood exporters and businesses, and reopen the EU market to GB shellfish from certain domestic waters. This will make it easier to sell British fish to our largest trading partner – in turn driving growth and removing barriers to trade that have been holding businesses back. 

    Under new plans to be set out by the Government later this week, coastal communities will receive a cash boost for new community facilities, better transport links and investment in apprenticeships. Proposals would see offshore wind farms required to invest into coastal communities benefiting for families, businesses and local community groups across the country.

    Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Steve Reed said:    

    The agreement reached today protects Britain’s fishing access, fishing rights and fishing areas with no increase in the amount of fish EU vessels can catch in British waters.  

    The Government is backing coastal communities by investing £360 million into our fishing industry, securing the future for the next generation of fishers and breathing new life into our coastal communities as part of the Plan For Change.

    Government and agencies to work with fishers to reform support to meet safety regulations, supporting the sector to be more prosperous and safe.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 19 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Man bitten by dingo while fishing on K’gari

    Source: Tasmania Police

    Issued: 19 May 2025

    Rangers are reminding fishers to be alert on K’gari after a man was bitten by a dingo whilst fishing in knee deep water around 11:30am near Eurong on 16 May 2025.

    The man was fishing alone when he was approached from behind by the dingo. It bit him on the back of the leg, resulting in two puncture wounds and a small superficial laceration which required basic first aid treatment.

    The man told rangers from the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation (DETSI) that the dingo was almost fully submerged in the water at the time of the incident.

    He was wearing a fishing bag containing a fish, and rangers believe the dingo may have been attracted by the smell.

    After being bitten, the man used his fishing rod to make contact with the dingo.

    In addition to this incident, DETSI has received recent reports that dingoes have been loitering around fishers on the island in hope of getting a free feed.

    Dingoes are known to steal fish and bait from anywhere they can scavenge, including vehicles, berley bags, shallow waters and straight off a fisher’s line.

    To fish responsibly, it’s important to stay close to the water’s edge when reeling in a fish and avoid dragging your catch across the sand.

    When removing bait from fishing hooks, it is recommended that a protective cover is placed on the hook, and it is stored out of reach of dingoes.

    Ranger Dan Novak would like to remind all visitors including fishers to be alert for dingoes on K’gari.

    “Dingoes are opportunistic predators and will strike when they see a chance to do so,” Mr Novak said.

    “To avoid a dingo incident, it’s always a good idea to have a mate stand guard, preferably holding a dingo stick.

    “It is an offence to hang bait or berley bags on the outside of vehicles, in trees, or have these lying around.

    “We have also seen dingoes grabbing bycatch or fish that are undersized as they’re being released.

    “To reduce the chance of a negative dingo interaction we remind visitors to be dingo safe at all times.”

    Visitors to K’gari are reminded to ‘Be dingo-safe!’ at all times:

    • Always stay close (within arm’s reach) of children and young teenagers
    • Always walk in groups and carry a stick.
    • Camp in fenced areas where possible
    • Do not run. Running or jogging can trigger a negative dingo interaction
    • Never feed dingoes
    • Lock up food stores and iceboxes (even on a boat)
    • Never store food or food containers in tents, and
    • Secure all rubbish, fish and bait.

    For more information go to K’gari dingoes

    MIL OSI News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Offset project to protect purple-necked rock-wallabies

    Source: Tasmania Police

    Issued: 19 May 2025

    Open larger image

    A purple-necked rock wallaby

    The Queensland Government will help safeguard populations of purple-necked rock-wallabies through a $364,000 offset program that will improve crucial habitat in the state’s northwest.

    The four-year offset project will fund environmental improvements on Chidna Station, which is a 26,000-hectare pastoral lease property around 130 kilometres north of Mount Isa.

    Chidna Station features rugged, rough country of breathtaking beauty that provides ideal habitat for the purple-necked rock wallaby along with other threatened species.

    The offset project will be a collaboration between the Department of the Environment, Tourism, Science and Innovation and environmental management group Conservation Partners.

    Conservation Partners have developed a strategic management plan for the purple-necked rock-wallabies, and will focus on the following pivotal actions:

    • Fire Break Maintenance – Fire breaks can help contain and reduce the impacts of bushfires.
    • Prescribed Burning – Planned burns will foster habitat diversity and promote growth of plant species that purple-necked rock-wallabies browse upon.
    • Fire Scar Mapping – High-resolution mapping and analysis of historical data will evaluate the success of fire management strategies for purple-necked rock-wallaby habitat.
    • Population monitoring – Surveys will evaluate the effects of fire management strategies on purple-necked rock-wallaby population dynamics.

    Acting Deputy Director General Environment and Heritage Policy and Programs Kahil Lloyd said the Queensland Government is committed to protecting and conserving our populations of threatened species.

    “This collaborative offset project represents a significant step forward in boosting populations of an at-risk species on privately-owned land,” Mr Lloyd said.

    “I’d like to thank the landholder at Chidna Station for their dedication to conservation and protecting the natural and cultural values of their property.

    “Conservation Partners have vast experience in habitat and species management and through this project will build upon the exceptional work of the department’s threatened species unit.

    “Our Offsets Framework is just one of the ways that we are making a difference to our threatened species.”

    Conservation Partners Chief Executive Steve Murphy said the organisation works closely with private landholders to conserve Queensland’s threatened species.

    “Conservation Partners works on stations in western Queensland, the Gulf and Cape York Peninsula, and many cattle stations have important conservation values,” he said.

    “Over the next four years we will work with Indigenous landowner Brussie Spreadborough to improve fire patterns on Chidna Station, mainly using aerial prescribed burning.

    “We’ll also closely monitor the impact on Purple-necked Rock-wallabies as well as Chidna’s other endangered wildlife populations, such as Carpentarian Grasswrens and Gouldian Finches.”

    Brussie Spreadborough said the partnership with Conservation Partners is a win-win situation.

    “Working with Conservation Partners means that I can concentrate on cattle, while also having a hand in good conservation work that looks after the native wildlife that lives on my place,” he said.

    MIL OSI News –

    May 20, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Study trip to Finland for representatives of the Ministry of Ecology, Environmental Protection and Climate Change of Uzbekistan

    Source: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe – OSCE

    Headline: Study trip to Finland for representatives of the Ministry of Ecology, Environmental Protection and Climate Change of Uzbekistan

    Study trip to Finland for representatives of the Ministry of Ecology, Environmental Protection and Climate Change of Uzbekistan | OSCE
    Skip navigation

    Navigation

    Navigation

    Home Newsroom News and press releases Study trip to Finland for representatives of the Ministry of Ecology, Environmental Protection and Climate Change of Uzbekistan

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    May 20, 2025
  • Sunflowers emerge as symbols of sustainability and agricultural value

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Sunflowers, long admired for their striking golden petals and towering height, are gaining renewed recognition not just for their beauty, but for their growing importance in agriculture, nutrition, and environmental sustainability. Native to North America, sunflowers have been cultivated for thousands of years, and today they are celebrated as much for their utility as for their vibrant appearance.

    Traditionally associated with positivity and admiration, sunflowers are now being acknowledged as essential contributors to global ecological and agricultural systems. One of their most remarkable traits is heliotropism, the ability of young flower heads to follow the sun’s path across the sky. Mature heads typically face east, optimizing exposure to morning sunlight. Each flower’s central disk is composed of hundreds to thousands of tiny florets, each capable of developing into a seed, while the surrounding yellow petals serve to attract pollinators like bees and butterflies.

    Easy to cultivate and tolerant of drought, sunflowers thrive in full sunlight and well-drained soils, making them a favored crop among farmers and gardeners. The seeds are harvested for various uses. Sunflower oil, known for its light flavor and health benefits, is a popular cooking oil rich in healthy fats, protein, and nutrients. The seeds are consumed directly as snacks or used in bird feed, while the remaining meal from oil extraction serves as a protein-rich livestock feed.

    Beyond the kitchen and the farm, sunflowers are increasingly important in sustainable energy research, with sunflower oil being explored for its potential in biodiesel production. Environmentally, the plant plays a key role in soil improvement through its deep root system and has shown promise in phytoremediation, the process of extracting toxic substances from polluted soil. Additionally, sunflowers help sustain pollinator populations, supporting biodiversity and ecosystem health.

    May 20, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 93 94 95 96 97 … 277
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress