NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI: Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. Announces Shareholder Approval of Merger with Carlyle Secured Lending III

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. (“CGBD”) (NASDAQ: CGBD) announced today that CGBD shareholders voted overwhelmingly in favor of the previously announced merger with Carlyle Secured Lending III (“CSL III”) at the special meeting held on March 26, 2025.

    Shareholders voted in favor of the issuance of common stock in connection with the merger of CGBD and CSL III, with 96% of voting CGBD shareholders supporting the proposal. The transaction is expected to close on or about March 27, 2025, subject to satisfaction or waiver of customary closing conditions.

    Justin Plouffe, Chief Executive Officer of CGBD and CSL III, said, “We thank shareholders for their approval and strong support of the transaction. We have conviction in the strategic benefits and value of the merger for both sets of shareholders, and we expect the combined company to create long-term value through increased portfolio scale and efficiency.”

    About Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc.    

    Carlyle Secured Lending, Inc. is a publicly traded (NASDAQ: CGBD) business development company (“BDC”) which began investing in 2013. The Company focuses on providing directly originated, financing solutions across the capital structure, with a focus on senior secured lending to middle-market companies primarily located in the United States. Carlyle Secured Lending is externally managed by Carlyle Global Credit Investment Management L.L.C., an SEC-registered investment adviser and wholly owned subsidiary of Carlyle. Further information is available at carlylesecuredlending.com.

    About Carlyle Secured Lending III

    CSL III is an externally-managed, non-diversified closed-end management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. CSL III’s investment objective is to generate current income and, to a lesser extent, capital appreciation primarily through assembling a portfolio of secured debt investments with favorable risk-adjusted returns. CSL III’s investment activities are managed by its investment adviser, CSL III Advisor, LLC, an affiliate of Carlyle.

    About Carlyle   

    Carlyle (NASDAQ: CG) is a global investment firm with deep industry expertise that deploys private capital across three business segments: Global Private Equity, Global Credit and Global Investment Solutions. With $441 billion of assets under management as of December 31, 2024, Carlyle’s purpose is to invest wisely and create value on behalf of its investors, portfolio companies and the communities in which we live and invest. Carlyle employs more than 2,300 people in 29 offices across four continents. Further information is available at www.carlyle.com. Follow Carlyle on X @OneCarlyle and LinkedIn at The Carlyle Group.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release may contain forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Some of the statements in this press release constitute forward-looking statements because they are not historical facts, but instead relate to future events, future performance or financial condition or the merger of CSL III with and into CGBD (collectively, the “Mergers” ). The forward-looking statements may include statements as to: future operating results of CGBD and CSL III and distribution projections; business prospects of CGBD and CSL III and the prospects of their portfolio companies; and the impact of the investments that CGBD and CSL III expect to make. You can identify these statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “will,” “should,” “may,” “plans,” “continue,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “targets,” “projects,” “outlook,” “potential,” “predicts” and variations of these words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements include these words. The forward-looking statements contained in this press release involve risks and uncertainties. Certain factors could cause actual results and conditions to differ materially from those projected, including the uncertainties associated with (i) the expected synergies and savings associated with the Mergers; (ii) the ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the Mergers, including the expected elimination of certain expenses and costs due to the Mergers; (iii) the risk that stockholder litigation in connection with the Mergers may result in significant costs of defense and liability; (iv) changes in the economy, financial markets and political environment, including the impacts of inflation and rising interest rates; (v) risks associated with possible disruption in the operations of CGBD or the economy generally due to terrorism, war or other geopolitical conflict (including the uncertainty surrounding Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine and the impact of geopolitical tensions in other regions such as the Middle East, and developing tensions between China and the United States); (vi) future changes in laws or regulations (including the interpretation of these laws and regulations by regulatory authorities); (vii) conditions in CGBD’s operating areas, particularly with respect to business development companies or regulated investment companies; and (viii) other considerations that may be disclosed from time to time in CGBD’s publicly disseminated documents and filings. CGBD and CSL III have based the forward-looking statements included in this press release on information available to them on the date hereof, and they assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they discuss our plans, strategies, prospects and expectations concerning our business, operating results, financial condition and other similar matters. We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to our investors. There may be events in the future, however, that we are not able to predict accurately or control. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which we make it. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ, possibly materially from our expectations, include, but are not limited to, the risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and it is not possible for us to predict or identify all of them. Although CGBD and CSL III undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that they may make directly to you or through reports that CGBD and CSL III have filed or in the future may file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including the annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

    Contacts:

    The MIL Network –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Nokia Corporation: Repurchase of own shares on 26.03.2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Nokia Corporation
    Stock Exchange Release
    26 March 2025 at 22:30 EET

    Nokia Corporation: Repurchase of own shares on 26.03.2025

    Espoo, Finland – On 26 March 2025 Nokia Corporation (LEI: 549300A0JPRWG1KI7U06) has acquired its own shares (ISIN FI0009000681) as follows:                

    Trading venue (MIC Code) Number of shares Weighted average price / share, EUR*
    XHEL 1,567,439 4.96
    CEUX 985,274 4.97
    BATE – –
    AQEU 96,142 4.96
    TQEX 169,350 4.97
    Total 2,818,205 4.96

    * Rounded to two decimals

    On 22 November 2024, Nokia announced that its Board of Directors is initiating a share buyback program to offset the dilutive effect of new Nokia shares issued to the shareholders of Infinera Corporation and certain Infinera Corporation share-based incentives. The repurchases in compliance with the Market Abuse Regulation (EU) 596/2014 (MAR), the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/1052 and under the authorization granted by Nokia’s Annual General Meeting on 3 April 2024 started on 25 November 2024 and end by 31 December 2025 and target to repurchase 150 million shares for a maximum aggregate purchase price of EUR 900 million.

    Total cost of transactions executed on 26 March 2025 was EUR 13,991,824. After the disclosed transactions, Nokia Corporation holds 200,047,080 treasury shares.

    Details of transactions are included as an appendix to this announcement.

    On behalf of Nokia Corporation

    BofA Securities Europe SA

    About Nokia
    At Nokia, we create technology that helps the world act together.

    As a B2B technology innovation leader, we are pioneering networks that sense, think and act by leveraging our work across mobile, fixed and cloud networks. In addition, we create value with intellectual property and long-term research, led by the award-winning Nokia Bell Labs which is celebrating 100 years of innovation.

    With truly open architectures that seamlessly integrate into any ecosystem, our high-performance networks create new opportunities for monetization and scale. Service providers, enterprises and partners worldwide trust Nokia to deliver secure, reliable and sustainable networks today – and work with us to create the digital services and applications of the future.

    Inquiries:

    Nokia Communications
    Phone: +358 10 448 4900
    Email: press.services@nokia.com
    Maria Vaismaa, Global Head of External Communications

    Nokia Investor Relations
    Phone: +358 931 580 507
    Email: investor.relations@nokia.com

    Attachment

    • Daily Report 2025-03-26

    The MIL Network –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Withdrawal of the Equal Treatment Directive – E-001151/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001151/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Estelle Ceulemans (S&D)

    Europe has always been at the forefront of the fight against discrimination. However, a directive that would ensure equal treatment for all regardless of race, ethnic background, religion and beliefs, disability, age and sexual orientation has been withdrawn from the work programme.

    • 1.Why has this commitment been retracted?
    • 2.According to the 2023 Eurobarometer, one in five Europeans had experienced discrimination in the 12 months leading up to the survey. This reality cannot be ignored. The directive aimed to ensure equal protection in all areas: work, housing, education and access to services. Many Member States and organisations continue to support this directive. However, we are being told that ‘progress is unlikely’. But is this any reason to give up?
    • 3.Equal treatment is not an option, it is one of the European Union’s fundamental principles. It is time not only to relaunch this directive, but to also strengthen it so that it becomes a binding instrument, ensuring effective implementation in all Member States. Is the Commission ready to re-open discussions on restoring this directive and making it a fully effective legal tool to ensure protection against discrimination?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Do you feel £1,400 better off every year since 2014?

    Source: Scottish National Party

    In the 2014 independence referendum Westminster politicians said “every Scot will be £1,400 better off every year” if people voted ‘No’.

    It’s therefore painfully ironic that, just a decade later, people in Scotland see headlines saying “UK families to be ‘£1,400-a-year poorer by 2030’.”

    New analysis by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) – using forecast models from the Bank of England – shows that the austerity policies of Keir Starmer’s government will leave people worse off in the next five years.

    The JRF also said that if living standards haven’t improved by 2030, Labour will not only have failed to meet their own election pledge but will have become the first government in nearly 75 years to have seen a fall in living standards across a full parliament.

    They concluded that the worse effects of these policies will fall on the poorest third of the population.

    The pledge that “every Scot will be £1,400 better off every year” is not only looking threadbare, it’s been ripped into rags by the very people who promised it.

    And, this is no joke, the same Westminster politicians seriously argued that this £1,400 meant people would be able to enjoy ‘scoffing 280 hot dogs’ or drinking ’636 cappuccinos’. Instead we’ve seen food banks rise year on year.

    But those aren’t the only promises Westminster politicians made to persuade people to vote ‘No’.

    In the run-up to the 2014 referendum people were also promised “lower shopping bills” and that Westminster would “keep energy costs down for families in Scotland“.

    Better Together on X: “Lower shopping bills than if we left the United Kingdom say supermarkets. Read more: http://t.co/hcmC81lu9q #indyref http://t.co/MmDmHF6nrt” / X

    Better Together on X: “Being part of the UK keeps energy costs down for families in Scotland http://t.co/VkNwzmQ4kq #indyref” / X

    They highlighted Gordon Brown urging people in Scotland to vote ‘No’ “to create a more socially just country“; and that a Westminster-run social security system “offers better protection for pensioners, disabled and the unemployed“.

    Better Together on X: “Gordon Brown urges people in Scotland to stay in the UK to create a more socially just country http://t.co/0s9ZggfkZN #indyref” / X

    Better Together on X: “Gordon Brown in Dundee: “Our UK welfare state offers better protection for pensioners, disabled and the unemployed.” http://t.co/AYzvqu9EBH” / X

    With Scots facing yet more energy bill increases – despite Labour promises to cut them by £300 – and Keir Starmer’s government cutting winter fuel payments for pensioners and support for the disabled.

    This situation not only makes a bad joke of the Westminster politicians’ promises in the 2014 independence referendum, but it also exposes the duplicity of Labour’s promise of “Change”.

    Even before the 2024 election the signs of the direction of the UK were obvious.

    Reports revealed that UK workers were missing out on over £10,000 a year, with living standards falling behind other G7 nations, as well as Australia and the Netherlands.

    Other analysis showed that, compared to neighbouring countries in north west Europe, the UK in the 21st century has had the least wealth per person, the most poverty, and the greatest gap between rich and poor. It also shows that countries similar in size or smaller than Scotland are wealthier and more equal than the north west European average.

    But it could be so much different, and better, for Scotland.

    With a huge offshore energy potential, a food and drink sector worth billions and one of the best educated populations in Europe and can even be asked: Why is Scotland in a UK trailing its neighbours so badly?

    The reason is that those countries don’t have government from Westminster obsessed with cutting public spending again and again.

    Those other countries get government’s they voted for with policies they want, and the results can be seen in how they are wealthier, fairer and happier than the UK.

    Despite the ‘No’ campaigns 2014 promises, Westminster isn’t working for Scotland, but independence works for those countries.

    So why shouldn’t it work for Scotland too?

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Security Minister observes counter-terrorism exercise in Wales

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    Security Minister observes counter-terrorism exercise in Wales

    Meeting emergency responders at a counter-terrorism training exercise in Wales, the Security Minister praised their collaboration to keep the public safe.

    The Security Minister re-emphasised the need for close working between national and devolved emergency services and responders to minimise the impact of a terrorist attack in Wales, during a visit to Swansea to observe a multi-agency counter-terrorism exercise on Wednesday (26 April).

    At the exercise at Swansea.com Stadium, he was able to watch emergency responders in Wales, including the police, fire and rescue, ambulance and other responder organisations, test their preparedness for a large-scale attack and ensure they work effectively together to keep the public safe.

    Thanking all those taking part in the exercise for their unwavering commitment to protecting the public, the Security Minister gave a speech to participants, to say that responding to an incident with mass fatalities successfully depends on trust, close working and collaboration between multiple agencies.

    Security Minister Dan Jarvis said:

    It was an immense privilege to witness the dedicated work of the emergency services and responder organisations and their unwavering commitment to keeping the people of Wales safe.

    National security is the foundation of our Plan for Change. This essential training ensures we are prepared for every eventuality and in the best position to save lives and protect our communities.

    It comes after the Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill completed its final parliamentary stage this week ahead of Royal Assent. This new legislation will ensure venues across the UK – which will include premises such as sports stadiums – consider the security of the public and take steps to protect them from harm.

    The new law is better known as Martyn’s Law in memory of Martyn Hett, who tragically lost his life alongside 21 others in the 2017 Manchester Arena terrorist attack.

    Wednesday’s exercise also sought to test the stadium’s internal contingency response plans. Under the Bill, qualifying premises like Swansea.com Stadium will be required to plan how best to respond to a terrorist attack.

    The exercise was part of a routine training exercise between the police, including Counter Terrorism Policing Wales and South Wales Police; and other services, such as the South Wales Fire and Rescue service, health and social care, and the Welsh Government; which work together in partnership to respond to and mitigate the impacts of incidents of this nature.

    The various agencies taking part were able to practice the application of the Joint Emergency Services Interoperability Principles (JESIP) which are widely acknowledged as critical to the success of a response to an incident and are the adopted principles for multi-agency working across the UK.

    The Security Minister also visited the Senedd in Cardiff where he met with the First Minister of Wales to discuss strengthening national security in Wales and remaining prepared for terrorist attacks.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Human Rights Committee Adopts Annual Report 2024-2025

    Source: United Nations – Geneva

    The Human Rights Committee this morning adopted its annual report on the work of its one hundred and forty-first (1-23 July 2024), one hundred and forty-second (14 October-7 November 2024), and one hundred and forty-third sessions (3-28 March 2025). 

    Introducing the report, Ivan Šimonović, Committee Rapporteur, said that as of 26 March 2025, 174 States were parties to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 116 States were parties to the Optional Protocol to the Covenant on individual communications, and 92 States were parties to the Second Optional Protocol, on the abolition of the death penalty.  Côte d’Ivoire and Zambia had acceded to the Second Optional Protocol in May and December 2024 respectively. 

    Country report task forces met during the three sessions to consider and adopt lists of issues on the reports of Chad and Latvia and lists of issues prior to reporting for Antigua and Barbuda, Austria, Barbados, Benin, Cameroon, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, the Dominican Republic, Jordan, Mauritius, Monaco, New Zealand, Poland, Samoa, Sierra Leone, Slovenia and South Africa.

    At its one hundred and forty-first session, the Committee adopted concluding observations on Croatia, Honduras, India, Maldives, Malta, Suriname and the Syrian Arab Republic.  At its one hundred and forty-second session, the Committee adopted concluding observations on Ecuador, France, Greece, Iceland, Pakistan and Türkiye.  At its one hundred and forty-third session, the Committee would adopt concluding observations on Albania, Burkina Faso, Mongolia, Montenegro and Zimbabwe.  The review of Haiti had been postponed to the Committee’s next session, due to the human rights situation in the country. 

    During the one hundred and forty-first session, the Special Rapporteur for follow-up on concluding observations submitted interim reports to the Committee.  During that session, the Committee reviewed the following States parties under the follow-up process: Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, Liberia, and Lao People’s Democratic Republic.

    Regarding communications, at its one hundred and forty-first session, the Committee examined 21 drafts concerning 63 communications: 53 communications were decided on the merits, 10 were declared inadmissible and 32 were closed. Regarding communications decided on the merits, the Committee found violations in 51 of them.  At its one hundred and forty-second session, the Committee examined 19 drafts concerning 308 communications: 287 were decided on the merits, 10 were declared inadmissible and 11 were closed.  With regard to the communications for which a decision was taken on the merits, the Committee found violations in 287 of them. At its one hundred and forty-third session, the Committee examined 19 drafts concerning 66 communications: 38 were decided on the merits, five were declared inadmissible and 23 were closed. The Committee found violations in 37 of the communications for which decisions were taken on the merits.  The Committee had successfully started applying its multifaceted strategy aimed at ending the high number of communications pending consideration and adoption.  Mr. Šimonović reiterated the Committee’s concern regarding the lack of resources and emphasised the importance of allocating adequate staff resources to service its sessions. 

    Following the presentation, various Committee experts took the floor, thanking the Rapporteur for his work on the report.  A speaker said that the Committee’s follow-up procedure allowed the Committee to remain in a dialogue with States parties on the implementation of the Covenant. States parties that had been under the Committee’s review were invited to submit their follow-up information and continue the dialogue.  The liquidity crisis was challenging, a speaker noted, and the Committee was approaching a point where it would be difficult to continue the high quality of their work without the required resources.  The Committee was sometimes the last beacon of hope for persons from countries to obtain legal redress outside their own legal system.  The report was worth being shared more broadly and could be further developed and enhanced, another speaker said. 

    The Committee then adopted the annual report, before closing the meeting.

    The Human Rights Committee’s one hundred and forty-third session is being held from 3 to 28 March 2025.  All the documents relating to the Committee’s work, including reports submitted by States parties, can be found on the session’s webpage.  Meeting summary releases can be found here.  The webcast of the Committee’s public meetings can be accessed via the UN Web TV webpage.

    The Committee will next meet in public at 11 a.m. on Friday 28 March to close its one hundred and forty-third session.

     

    Produced by the United Nations Information Service in Geneva for use of the media; 
    not an official record. English and French versions of our releases are different as they are the product of two separate coverage teams that work independently.

     

    CCPR25.007E

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: Ukraine, Pact for the Future, Climate & other topics – Daily Press Briefing | United Nations

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Noon Briefing by Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

    Highlights:
    Ukraine
    Ukraine/Security Council
    Pact for the Future
    Climate
    Renewables
    Occupied Palestinian Territory
    Sudan
    South Sudan
    Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Haiti
    Biological Weapons Convention
    Clarification
    Financial Contributions

    UKRAINEThe Secretary-General welcomes the discussions and reported commitments reached in Saudi Arabia by the United States, the Russian Federation and Ukraine.Reaching an agreement on freedom of navigation in the Black Sea to ensure the protection of civilian vessels and port infrastructure, will be a crucial contribution to the global food security and supply chains, reflecting the importance of trade routes from both Ukraine and the Russian Federation to global markets.The United Nations has been working consistently, especially following the letters the Secretary-General sent to Presidents Zelenskyy, Putin and Erdogan on 7 February 2024 putting forward a proposal for the safe and free navigation in the Black Sea.The United Nations also remains closely engaged in the continued implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding with the Russian Federation on facilitating access of Russian food and fertilizers to global markets to address global food security.The Secretary-General’s good offices remain available to support all efforts towards peace.The Secretary-General reiterates his hope that such efforts will pave the way for a durable ceasefire and contribute to achieving a just, comprehensive and lasting peace in Ukraine, in line with the UN Charter, international law and relevant UN resolutions and in full respect of Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity.That statement is now being shared with you electronically.
    UKRAINE/SECURITY COUNCILFurther on Ukraine: Assistant Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs Joyce Msuya briefed Security Council members this morning and said that since 1 March, not a day has passed without an attack harming civilians in that country. She said we are particularly appalled by the strikes countrywide on 7 March that killed 21 civilians and injured many more, making it one of the deadliest days this year.Across Ukraine, Ms. Msuya said, almost 13 million people need humanitarian assistance. More than 10 million Ukrainians have been forced to flee their homes, including 3.7 million of them who are internally displaced. This displacement is disproportionately affecting women and girls, heightening their exposure to gender-based violence and hindering their access to support services, she told the members of the Security Council. She told that recent funding cuts have led to a reprioritization of Ukraine response efforts that will be announced in the coming weeks. Continued financial support will be essential to maintain our operations there.
    UKRAINE/HUMANITARIANFurther on Ukraine from the ground, our colleagues in Ukraine tell us that today, an inter-agency convoy delivered vital aid to one of the most affected communities in the Donetsk region. This is the fourth convoy to front-lines communities in the region this year.Humanitarians brought in six metric tonnes of medical, hygiene and other critical supplies, including those for older people, to help some 1,500 residents remaining in the community of Kostiantynivka.Local residents there face daily shelling. Homes and critical civilian infrastructure have been damaged and electricity, water and the gas supply have been disrupted.

    Full Highlights: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/ossg/noon-briefing-highlight?date%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=26+March+2025

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zM1F1O1Svuo

    MIL OSI Video –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Secretary-General’s remarks to the Virtual High-Level Segment of the 16th Petersberg Climate Dialogue [as delivered]

    Source: United Nations – English

    hank you for this opportunity — and for your focus today on collective climate action and acceleration of implementation. 

    This could not be more timely. 

    There is much uncertainty and instability in our world.

    But today we meet in the wake of some good news.

    Just this morning, the International Renewable Energy Agency officially confirmed that 2024 was a record year for renewables additions to global power capacity. 

    Renewables represented more than 92 per cent of all new electricity generation capacity installed last year.
     
    The amount of renewables added represents more than the total electricity capacity of Brazil and Japan combined.

    Europe’s capacity grew by 9 per cent – with Germany contributing more than one-quarter of that growth. Africa’s capacity grew by almost 7 per cent.

    All of this is another reminder of a 21st century truth:

    Renewables are renewing economies. 

    They are powering growth, creating jobs, lowering energy bills, and cleaning our air. 
     
    And every day, they become an even smarter investment. 

    Since 2010, the average cost of wind power has plunged 60%.  Solar is 90% cheaper. 

    In 2023, clean energy sectors accounted for five per cent of economic growth in India and six in the US. It accounted for a fifth of China’s GDP growth, and a third of the EU’s.

    The economic case for – and opportunities of – climate action have become ever clearer – particularly for those who choose to lead. 

    And leadership is what we need – as today’s IRENA report shows:

    To accelerate the shift to renewables…

    And to correct the imbalances in the transition, which is still starving developing countries – outside China – of the investment needed to fully embrace clean energy. 

    Excellencies, dear friends,

    As the title of this session puts it so well: we are indeed at a turning point to the future.

    In the ten years since Paris, we have seen other important progress.

    Ninety percent of global emissions are now covered by net-zero targets. 

    A decade ago, the planet was on course for a global temperature rise of over four degrees Celsius.

    Today, countries’ national climate plans – or NDCs – if fully delivered – will take us closer to a 2.6-degree rise.

    At the same time, climate challenges are piling up.  

    It seems records are shattered at every turn — the hottest day of the hottest month of the hottest year of the hottest decade ever. 

    All of this is hitting the vulnerable hardest, and everyday people in their pockets – with higher living costs, higher insurance premiums, and higher food prices.

    Just last week, the World Meteorological Organization confirmed that 2024 was another alarming year:

    Almost every climate indicator reached new and increasingly dangerous heights – inflaming displacement and food insecurity and inflicting huge economic losses.

    And, for the first time, the annual global temperature was 1.5 degrees Celsius hotter than pre-industrial times.

    Scientists are clear – it is still possible to meet the long-term 1.5 degree limit.

    But it requires urgent action. And it requires leadership.

    Excellencies, dear friends,

    I see two critical fronts to drive action. 

    First, new national climate plans – or NDCs – due by September.

    Investors need certainty and predictability.

    These new plans are a unique opportunity to deliver – and lay out a coherent vision for a just green transition.

    They must align with the 1.5-degree limit, as agreed at COP28. And cover all emissions and the whole economy.

    Together, they must reduce global emissions 60% by 2035 – compared to 2019…

    And contribute to the COP28 global energy transition goals.

    All this must be achieved in line with the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in the light of national circumstances but everybody, everybody must do more.

    The G20 – the largest emitters and economies – must lead.

    Every country must step up and play their part.

    The United Nations is with you all.

    President Lula and I are working to secure the highest ambition from the largest economies.

    The United Nations Climate Promise is supporting a hundred countries to prepare their new climate plans.

    And we will convene a special event in September to take stock of the plans of all countries, push for action to keep 1.5 within reach, and deliver climate justice.

    Second, we must drive finance to developing countries.

    The COP29 finance agreement must be implemented in full.

    I count on the leadership of the COP29 and COP30 Presidencies to deliver a credible roadmap to mobilize $1.3 trillion a year by 2035.

    We need new and innovative sources of financing, and credible carbon pricing.

    Developed countries must honour their promise to double adaptation finance to at least $40 billion a year, by this year.

    And we need serious contributions to the fund for responding to Loss and Damage, and to get it up and running.
    Excellencies,

    We can only meet these goals with stronger collaboration – between governments, and across society and sectors.

    Those that will lag behind need to be not a reason for us to be discouraged but an increase in our commitment to move forward.

    The rewards are there for the taking, for all those ready and willing to lead the world through these troubled times.

    We are at a turning point.  I urge you to seize this moment; and seize the prize.

    Thank you.
     

    MIL OSI Africa –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Secretary-General’s remarks to the Informal Interactive Dialogue on the Implementation of the Pact for the Future [bilingual, as delivered; scroll down for all-English version]

    Source: United Nations – English

    r. President of the General Assembly, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

    I thank the President of the General Assembly for convening this important dialogue — the first of three in the coming months. 

    From day one of the Pact for the Future’s adoption, the President has been its active champion.

    I deeply appreciate your efforts, Mr. President, and your leadership.

    Excellencies,

    Adopting the Pact was the beginning of the process, not the end. 

    Today I want to focus on what we have done over the last six months — and what we need to do.

    We face a long list of challenges.  

    Conflicts and climate disasters are intensifying.  

    The Sustainable Development Goals are far off-track — as is the funding required to achieve them.

    Geopolitical divisions and mistrust are blocking effective action, with some actively questioning the value of international cooperation and the multilateral system itself.

    But let me be very clear.  It is exactly because of these divides and these mistrusts that the Pact for the Future and the two parallel documents are more important than ever.  And the bigger the obstacle, the bigger will be my determination to make things move forward in line with the will expressed by Member States in the Summit of the Future.

    Meanwhile, critical funding is being drastically cut for people in desperate need — with more reductions to come.

    Resources are shrinking across the board — and they have been for a long time. 

    From day one of my mandate, we embarked on an ambitious agenda to become more effective and cost-effective across our organization.

    Earlier this month, I announced the “UN80” initiative to continue this work and intensify it.

    We’re reviewing efficiencies and improvements to current arrangements, the implementation of mandates handed down by Member States, and structural changes and programme realignment.

    All these will contribute for a more effective implementation of the Pact for the Future.

    Excellencies,

    We’ve wasted no time moving into the implementation phase of the Pact.

    From an operational perspective, we established a principal-level steering committee — which I chair — overseeing six working groups focused on action and reforms in key areas:

    Sustainable Development Goals acceleration…peace and security… international financial architecture…digital technologies…UN governance…and youth.

    We’ve created two task teams focusing on future generations and the need to look beyond GDP as a measure of progress and guide to policy-making. 

    And we’re establishing an internal tracking system to monitor our progress on Pact implementation.

    Today, I’d like to report on our efforts since the Pact was adopted, and outline the work ahead in four areas.

    First — peace and security.

    United Nations peace operations help safeguard people and communities in some of the most desperate corners of the world. 

    The Pact represents a commitment to strengthen tools to prevent and address conflict, to ensure that our peace efforts respond to new and emerging threats.

    In November, I issued a report on peacebuilding which included concrete suggestions to strengthen the Peacebuilding Commission and Fund. 

    We’re actively working on the second independent progress study on the positive contribution of young people to peace processes.  

    And we’re progressing on a review of all forms of Peace Operations — as requested in the Pact. 

    Our recent proposals to the Security Council regarding Haiti are a case in point where new approaches can be developed to complex security challenges.

    The review will be an opportunity to help adapt peace operations to today’s realities, and ensure they’re guided by clear and sequenced mandates that are realistic and achievable — with viable exit strategies and transition plans.

    It will also recognize the limitations of our operations where there is little or no peace to keep.

    We will also continue pushing forward on other peace-related priorities of the Pact — including disarmament commitments around nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, lethal autonomous weapons and the growing weaponization of outer space.

    And we will continue advocating — including through the intergovernmental negotiations process — for the Pact’s call to make the Security Council more representative of today’s world and more effective in the capacity to promote peace in the world.

    Second — finance for development.

    Since the Pact’s adoption, we’ve taken action on several fronts.

    For example, our Resident Coordinators and Country Teams are now mapping out how we can accelerate progress at the national levels in close cooperation with the Governments.

    We’ve begun analyzing the impact of military expenditure on the achievement of the SDGs and on our own work at the UN — with a final report out by September.

    The Expert Group called for in the Pact to develop measures of progress that go beyond Gross Domestic Product will soon be announced, and will work throughout the year before an inter-governmental process takes over in 2026.

    And we’ve been working closely with the World Bank and the IMF to follow-up on the Pact’s action points addressing improvements to the international financial system.

    Developing countries must be represented fairly in the governance of the very institutions they depend on.

    We know the environment is not favourable.

    But we must not give up.

    Since the Pact’s adoption, I have also established an expert group to identify practical steps for action on debt.

    In the coming weeks, they will propose a list of achievable outcomes — and release a full report in June in advance of the Financing for Development Conference in Spain.

    Debt relief is a central issue if we want the implementation and the Pact for the Future a reality.

    At the same time, we will continue advocating to increase the lending capacity of Multilateral Development Banks, to make them bigger and bolder.

    This includes both stretching their balance sheets and recapitalization.

    And we must ensure that concessional finance is deployed where it is most needed.

    Many of these actions depend on decisions of other multilateral institutions and of Member States, but we will not relent in our constant advocacy for what the Pact for the Future has clearly indicated as the way to pursue.

    Three — youth and future generations 

    Our efforts must deliver for young people and the generations to come. 

    The Pact’s central promise to young people is to listen to their concerns and ideas, and including them at the decision-making table.

    Following the establishment of a UN Youth Office in 2022, young people played a key role in shaping the Pact’s priorities.

    With the Pact’s adoption, we’re now progressing towards establishing a Youth Investment Platform to ensure that national funding mechanisms and investment platforms are focused on the needs of young people.

    And we’re developing core principles to strengthen youth engagement across our work at the United Nations — including by broadening the representation of younger colleagues within our organizational structures.

    Through the Declaration on Future Generations, we’re also looking to the generations yet to be born.

    We’ve established a Strategic Foresight Network and Community of Practice, to ensure our policies, programmes and field operations are based on long-term thinking.

    And later this year, I will appoint a Special Envoy for Future Generations to scale up these efforts.

    Quatrièmement : la technologie.

    Nous mettons en œuvre les appels du Pacte mondial pour le numérique pour combler toutes les fractures numériques et veiller à ce que tout le monde puisse bénéficier d’un espace numérique sûr et sécurisé.

    L’intelligence artificielle fait l’objet d’une attention particulière.

    Nous élaborons un rapport sur les options novatrices de financement volontaire qui permettraient de renforcer les capacités en matière d’intelligence artificielle afin d’aider les pays du Sud à exploiter cette technologie au service de l’intérêt général – en tenant compte des recommandations formulées par mon Organe consultatif de haut niveau. 

    Un avant-projet de résolution visant à établir le Groupe scientifique international indépendant sur l’IA et à organiser un Dialogue mondial sur la gouvernance de l’IA a été distribué la semaine dernière – grâce au travail des co-facilitateurs, l’Espagne et le Costa Rica.

    J’invite l’Assemblée générale à agir rapidement pour mettre sur pied ce Groupe et veiller à ce que le savoir-faire et les connaissances en matière d’IA soient mis à la disposition de tous les pays – tout en soutenant le Dialogue mondial.

    L’ensemble du système de l’ONU se tient prêt à soutenir ces travaux.

    Excellences,

    Tout en défendant ces priorités, nous nous attelons par ailleurs à améliorer l’efficience et l’efficacité de nos opérations – comme l’exige le Pacte.

    L’automne dernier, nous avons entrepris une évaluation complète dans l’ensemble des entités de l’ONU afin d’exploiter le potentiel de l’innovation, de l’analyse des données, de la transformation numérique et de la prospective dans l’ensemble de nos travaux – conformément à l’initiative ONU 2.0.

    Les résultats sont déjà au rendez-vous : nous avons par exemple été capable de constater une accélération de l’évaluation des catastrophes dans la région Asie-Pacifique, un renforcement des programmes de sécurité sociale au Malawi, ou encore une consolidation des fonctions relatives à l’informatique dans l’ensemble du système des Nations Unies.

    Ces efforts, où les données sont une question essentielle pour que nous puissions faire une bien meilleure gestion de ces données – ces efforts doivent se poursuivre, en particulier au regard des problèmes de financement auxquels nous devons faire face.

    Nous comptons sur votre soutien pour mener ce travail à bien.

    Excellences,

    Alors que nous œuvrons pour remodeler le système multilatéral et ainsi relever les défis du monde d’aujourd’hui, le Pacte pour l’avenir est un rouage essentiel de ce processus de renouvellement constant.

    Nous ne pouvons pas diluer nos efforts.

    Gardons intact l’esprit et la détermination qui ont permis de forger et d’adopter le Pacte.

    Nous comptons sur vous pour éclairer, inspirer et guider le travail de mise en œuvre à venir.

    Une fois encore, merci pour vos idées et votre engagement.

    ***
    [All-English]

    Mr. President of the General Assembly, Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

    I thank the President of the General Assembly for convening this important dialogue — the first of three in the coming months. 

    From day one of the Pact for the Future’s adoption, the President has been its active champion.

    I deeply appreciate your efforts, Mr. President, and your leadership.

    Excellencies,

    Adopting the Pact was the beginning of the process, not the end. 

    Today I want to focus on what we have done over the last six months — and what we need to do.

    We face a long list of challenges.  

    Conflicts and climate disasters are intensifying.  

    The Sustainable Development Goals are far off-track — as is the funding required to achieve them.

    Geopolitical divisions and mistrust are blocking effective action, with some actively questioning the value of international cooperation and the multilateral system itself.

    But let me be very clear.  It is exactly because of these divides and these mistrusts that the Pact for the Future and the two parallel documents are more important than ever.  And the bigger the obstacle, the bigger will be my determination to make things move forward in line with the will expressed by Member States in the Summit of the Future.

    Meanwhile, critical funding is being drastically cut for people in desperate need — with more reductions to come.

    Resources are shrinking across the board — and they have been for a long time. 

    From day one of my mandate, we embarked on an ambitious agenda to become more effective and cost-effective across our organization.

    Earlier this month, I announced the “UN80” initiative to continue this work and intensify it.

    We’re reviewing efficiencies and improvements to current arrangements, the implementation of mandates handed down by Member States, and structural changes and programme realignment.

    All these will contribute for a more effective implementation of the Pact for the Future.

    Excellencies,

    We’ve wasted no time moving into the implementation phase of the Pact.

    From an operational perspective, we established a principal-level steering committee — which I chair — overseeing six working groups focused on action and reforms in key areas:

    Sustainable Development Goals acceleration…peace and security… international financial architecture…digital technologies…UN governance…and youth.

    We’ve created two task teams focusing on future generations and the need to look beyond GDP as a measure of progress and guide to policy-making. 

    And we’re establishing an internal tracking system to monitor our progress on Pact implementation.

    Today, I’d like to report on our efforts since the Pact was adopted, and outline the work ahead in four areas.

    First — peace and security.

    United Nations peace operations help safeguard people and communities in some of the most desperate corners of the world. 

    The Pact represents a commitment to strengthen tools to prevent and address conflict, to ensure that our peace efforts respond to new and emerging threats.

    In November, I issued a report on peacebuilding which included concrete suggestions to strengthen the Peacebuilding Commission and Fund. 

    We’re actively working on the second independent progress study on the positive contribution of young people to peace processes.  

    And we’re progressing on a review of all forms of Peace Operations — as requested in the Pact. 

    Our recent proposals to the Security Council regarding Haiti are a case in point where new approaches can be developed to complex security challenges.

    The review will be an opportunity to help adapt peace operations to today’s realities, and ensure they’re guided by clear and sequenced mandates that are realistic and achievable — with viable exit strategies and transition plans.

    It will also recognize the limitations of our operations where there is little or no peace to keep.

    We will also continue pushing forward on other peace-related priorities of the Pact — including disarmament commitments around nuclear, biological and chemical weapons, lethal autonomous weapons and the growing weaponization of outer space.

    And we will continue advocating — including through the intergovernmental negotiations process — for the Pact’s call to make the Security Council more representative of today’s world and more effective in the capacity to promote peace in the world.

    Second — finance for development.

    Since the Pact’s adoption, we’ve taken action on several fronts.

    For example, our Resident Coordinators and Country Teams are now mapping out how we can accelerate progress at the national levels in close cooperation with the Governments.

    We’ve begun analyzing the impact of military expenditure on the achievement of the SDGs and on our own work at the UN — with a final report out by September.

    The Expert Group called for in the Pact to develop measures of progress that go beyond Gross Domestic Product will soon be announced, and will work throughout the year before an inter-governmental process takes over in 2026.

    And we’ve been working closely with the World Bank and the IMF to follow-up on the Pact’s action points addressing improvements to the international financial system.

    Developing countries must be represented fairly in the governance of the very institutions they depend on.

    We know the environment is not favourable.

    But we must not give up.

    Since the Pact’s adoption, I have also established an expert group to identify practical steps for action on debt.

    In the coming weeks, they will propose a list of achievable outcomes — and release a full report in June in advance of the Financing for Development Conference in Spain.

    Debt relief is a central issue if we want the implementation and the Pact for the Future a reality.

    At the same time, we will continue advocating to increase the lending capacity of Multilateral Development Banks, to make them bigger and bolder.

    This includes both stretching their balance sheets and recapitalization.

    And we must ensure that concessional finance is deployed where it is most needed.

    Many of these actions depend on decisions of other multilateral institutions and of Member States, but we will not relent in our constant advocacy for what the Pact for the Future has clearly indicated as the way to pursue.

    Three — youth and future generations 

    Our efforts must deliver for young people and the generations to come. 

    The Pact’s central promise to young people is to listen to their concerns and ideas, and including them at the decision-making table.

    Following the establishment of a UN Youth Office in 2022, young people played a key role in shaping the Pact’s priorities.

    With the Pact’s adoption, we’re now progressing towards establishing a Youth Investment Platform to ensure that national funding mechanisms and investment platforms are focused on the needs of young people.

    And we’re developing core principles to strengthen youth engagement across our work at the United Nations — including by broadening the representation of younger colleagues within our organizational structures.

    Through the Declaration on Future Generations, we’re also looking to the generations yet to be born.

    We’ve established a Strategic Foresight Network and Community of Practice, to ensure our policies, programmes and field operations are based on long-term thinking.

    And later this year, I will appoint a Special Envoy for Future Generations to scale up these efforts.

    Fourth — technology.

    We’re implementing the Global Digital Compact’s calls to close all digital divides and ensure all people benefit from a safe and secure digital space.

    Artificial Intelligence is a particular focus.

    We’re developing a report on innovative voluntary financing options for AI capacity-building to help the Global South harness AI for the greater good, taking into account the recommendations of my High-Level Advisory Body. 

    The zero draft resolution to establish the International Independent Scientific Panel on AI and convene a Global Dialogue on AI Governance was also circulated last week — thanks to the work of the co-facilitators, Spain and Costa Rica.

    I urge the General Assembly to act swiftly to establish this Panel, and ensure that AI expertise and knowledge are available to all countries, while supporting the Global Dialogue.

    The UN system stands ready to support this work.

    Excellencies,

    As we push for these priorities, we’re also improving the efficiency and effectiveness of our operations, as called for by the Pact.

    Last fall, we undertook a comprehensive assessment across UN entities to harness the potential of innovation, data analytics, digital transformation and foresight across our work — as called for in the UN 2.0 initiative.

    We’re already seeing results: from speeding-up disaster assessments in the Asia-Pacific, to strengthening social security programmes in Malawi, to consolidating Information Technology functions across the UN System.

    This work must continue — especially in light of the funding challenges we face.

    We’re counting on your support as we move forward.

    Excellencies,

    The Pact for the Future is an essential part of this process of constant renewal, as we re-shape the multilateral system for the challenges of today’s world.

    We cannot dilute our efforts.

    We need to sustain the same spirit and determination in which the Pact was forged and adopted.

    We count on you to inform, inspire and guide the implementation work ahead.

    Once again, thank you for your ideas and commitment. 

    MIL OSI Africa –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Statement attributable to the Spokesperson for the Secretary-General – on the outcomes of meetings of experts on the Black Sea

    Source: United Nations – English

    he Secretary-General welcomes the discussions and reported commitments reached in Saudi Arabia by the United States, the Russian Federation and Ukraine.

    Reaching an agreement on freedom of navigation in the Black Sea to ensure the protection of civilian vessels and port infrastructure, will be a crucial contribution to global food security and supply chains, reflecting the importance of trade routes from both Ukraine and the Russian Federation to global markets.

    The United Nations has been working consistently, especially following the letters the Secretary-General sent to Presidents Zelenskyy, Putin and Erdogan on 7 February 2024 putting forward a proposal for safe and free navigation in the Black Sea. 

    The United Nations also remains closely engaged in the continued implementation of the Memorandum of Understanding with the Russian Federation on facilitating access of Russian food and fertilizers to global markets to address global food security.

    The Secretary-General’s good offices remain available to support all efforts towards peace.

    The Secretary-General reiterates his hope that such efforts will pave the way for a durable ceasefire and contribute to achieving a just, comprehensive and lasting peace in Ukraine, in line with the UN Charter, international law and relevant UN resolutions and in full respect of Ukraine’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity.   

    MIL OSI Africa –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Graham, Cotton Introduce Bill To Keep Cellphones Out Of Jails

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for South Carolina Lindsey Graham

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) today joined U.S. Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) in introducing legislation to prevent inmates from using contraband cellphones in correctional facilities. The Cellphone Jamming Reform Act of 2025 would allow state and federal prisons to use cellphone jamming systems.  

    Yesterday, Graham met with Bryan Stirling, Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections, and discussed this legislation.

    “I have been meeting with the Director of the South Carolina Department of Corrections Bryan Stirling and his team for years trying to get federal legislation that would jam cellphone signals in corrections institutions. Cellphones in prisons are widely used by inmates to communicate with drug cartels, human traffickers and gun runners. Bryan and his team have made it real to me that cellphones in prisons aid and abet lawbreaking.

    “I completely support Senator Cotton’s legislation that would stop this practice. This needs to come to an end,” said Graham.

    The legislation is also cosponsored by U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy (R-Louisiana), Shelley Moore Capito (R-West Virginia), Mike Crapo (R-Idaho), Bill Hagerty (R-Tennessee), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Mississippi), James Lankford (R-Oklahoma), and James Risch (R-Idaho). Congressman David Kustoff (R-Tennessee) is leading companion legislation in the House.

    Background:

    • The use of contraband cellphones is widespread in both federal and state prison facilities. Inmates have used contraband cellphones to conduct illegal activities, including ordering hits on individuals outside of the prison walls, running illegal drug operations, conducting illegal business deals, facilitating sex trafficking, and organizing escapes which endanger correctional employees, other inmates, and members of the public.
    • In 2018, a gang fight over territory using cellphones to trade contraband sparked a brawl inside the Lee Correctional Institution near Bishopville, South Carolina, and left seven inmates dead and 20 injured.
    • Last year, two 13-year-old boys were killed at a birthday party in Atlanta after inmates in a Georgia prison used contraband cellphones to order their murder. In 2024, Georgia authorities confiscated more than 15,500 contraband cellphones and seized more than 8,000 in 2023.
    • In December 2024, two California inmates were convicted of murder, racketeering, and other RICO-related crimes for running a heroin and meth trafficking operation from their prison cells. 
    • Bureau of Prisons Correctional officer Lt. Osvaldo Albarati was murdered in 2013 for interrupting an illicit contraband cellphone business. His actual assassination was initiated by an inmate using a contraband cellphone to contact the gunman as outlined in the indictment.                                                                                                      

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: In-Depth Analysis – Recovery and Resilience Dialogue with the European Commission – 26-03-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Executive Vice-President Fitto and Commissioner Dombrovskis are invited to the 18th Recovery and Resilience Dialogue (RRD) under the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) Regulation, scheduled for 31 March 2025. The previous RRD took place on 10 February 2025. For further details on sections 1 and 2 please contact EGOV. For further details on section 3 please contact EGOV and BSU.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Hungary’s latest attack on LGBTIQ people: a ban on Pride marches in Hungary – E-001162/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001162/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Alice Kuhnke (Verts/ALE)

    On 17 March 2025, members of the ruling coalition in Hungary submitted a bill to the Hungarian Parliament that would ban Budapest Pride, as well as other Pride marches in Hungary, and allow authorities to use facial recognition software to identify those participating in the marches.

    The bill, passed on 18 March, will significantly exacerbate the repression and marginalisation of the Hungarian LGBTIQ community that has resulted from the so-called ‘child protection law’, and constitutes a blatant violation of EU law, in particular the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union.

    The Commission, joined by 16 Member States, has already brought Hungary before the Court of Justice of the EU in ongoing infringement proceedings over the anti-LGBTIQ legislation introduced in 2021. It is now urgent that the Commission take measures to ensure the bill is suspended, so that Hungary’s queer community and their allies can march freely and safely on 28 June, as is their fundamental right.

    • 1.Will the Commission take action to have the bill suspended?
    • 2.In response to the bill, will the Commission consider the possibility of an additional freeze on EU funds for Hungary?
    • 3.What further measures will the Commission take to ensure the safety, freedom and rights of the LGBTIQ community in Hungary?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Concerns about humanitarian aid in Syria reaching minorities persecuted by Islamists – P-001099/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-001099/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Mathilde Androuët (PfE)

    Last December, when Islamists took power in Syria, Ursula von der Leyen recalled that the EU had been Syria’s largest donor since 2011, providing EUR 33 billion in humanitarian aid. This, she said, had been done ‘while respecting the principles of no contact, no cooperation, no funding to the Assad regime’[1]. The Commissioner for Preparedness, Crisis Management and Equality, Hadja Lahbib, announced in January that in 2025 the Commission would provide further humanitarian aid to Syrians totalling EUR 235 million[2].

    The massacres of civilians committed by Islamist fighters supporting Ahmed al-Sharaa’s ‘provisional government’[3] raise questions about the extremist militias’ intention to allow this aid to be distributed fairly, especially to the Alawite community, but also to the Christians, who urgently need it and who, for political reasons, receive little help from the West[4].

    In this context, will the Commission pay particular attention to ensuring that the humanitarian aid is properly distributed, with the same political and ‘ethical’ requirements expressed under the previous regime?

    Submitted: 14.3.2025

    • [1] ‘Press statement by President von der Leyen with President of Türkiye Erdoğan’, European Commission, 17 December 2024.
    • [2] ‘EU provides €235 million humanitarian aid to Syrians’, European Commission, 17 January 2025.
    • [3] ‘Massacres en Syrie: les nouvelles autorités mises à l’épreuve par les pires violences depuis la chute d’Al‑Assad’, Franceinfo, Fabien Magnenou, 10 March 2025, https://www.francetvinfo.fr/monde/revolte-en-syrie/massacres-en-syrie-les-nouvelles-autorites-mises-a-l-epreuve-par-les-pires-violences-depuis-la-chute-d-al-assad_7121439.html.
    • [4] ‘Les aides financières à la Syrie rétrécissent, la minorité chrétienne en danger’, Vatican News, Delphine Allaire, 19 June 2023, https://www.vaticannews.va/fr/monde/news/2023-06/syrie-chretiens-guerre-moyen-orient-onu-ue-reconstruction-ong.html
    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 – implementing acts – P-000847/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The intention of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014[1] as amended by Regulation (EU) 2024/1183[2] is to enable all EU citizens and residents to identify in a secure way and under full protection of personal data for online public and private services. Providing digital identification guaranteed by governments to the private sector is therefore a basic objective of the regulation.

    In addition, user identification by private services is mandated in paragraph 2 of Article 5f on the cross-border reliance on European Digital Identity Wallets in the basic act.

    It specifically states that where ‘… strong user authentication for online identification or where strong user authentication for online identification is required by contractual obligation, including in the areas of transport, energy, banking, financial services, social security, health, drinking water, postal services, digital infrastructure, education or telecommunications, those private relying parties shall, … also accept European Digital Identity Wallets that are provided in accordance with this regulation.’

    Relying parties, whether private or public must register in the Member State where they are established in order to rely upon European Digital Identity Wallets.

    As noted above, there is already a broad obligation for the private sector to rely upon the European Digital Identity Wallet for user authentication and identification.

    As Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 is not regulating how to provide for identity matching for private relying parties, it is up to Member States how to tackle this.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2014/910/oj/eng
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401183
    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Insurance market in Ireland – P-000194/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The case-law of the Court of Justice confirms the principle of freedom to set rates in the non-life insurance sector.[1] In accordance with this case-law, this does not preclude national measures liable to have effects on the rates.

    It is the responsibility of the national competent authorities to supervise insurance undertakings, including ensuring that these undertakings comply with their obligations under the applicable national laws, taking into account all relevant factual and legal circumstances of each case.

    The Commission may intervene only in cases where a breach of EU law has been identified. At this stage, the Commission is not aware of any such instance.

    • [1] See, to that effect, the judgment of the Court of Justice of 7 March 2013, C-577/11, paragraphs 21 and 22.
    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Absorption of NSRF funds by Greece – E-001021/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001021/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sakis Arnaoutoglou (S&D)

    The absorption of NSRF funds in Greece appears to be progressing slowly, with many critical projects in the areas of infrastructure, innovation and the green transition at a standstill. Management problems and bureaucratic red tape are preventing the timely and effective use of resources, putting the achievement of the programme’s objectives at risk.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.What is the Commission’s assessment of the current absorption rate of NSRF funds in Greece and what are the main reasons for the delays?
    • 2.Does the Commission intend to provide additional technical support or impose corrective measures to ensure the timely and effective implementation of projects?
    • 3.How does the Commission assess the Greek Government’s ability to complete the NSRF projects on time and avoid wasting funds?

    Submitted: 10.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Ageism in service provision – E-001159/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001159/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Giorgos Georgiou (The Left)

    Article 25 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU emphasises that the Union recognises and respects the right of the elderly to lead a life of dignity and independence and to participate in social and cultural life. However, data recently discussed in the Cypriot Parliament confirm that older adults are subjected to ageism and unreasonable actions by insurance companies.

    Specifically, there have been a large number of complaints about arbitrary insurance premium increases for older adults. This means that low-income pensioners stay stuck at home because they are not in a position to pay the excessively high car insurance rates. Also, in many cases, insurance companies refuse to insure older adults, exploiting the legal vacuum that exists.

    In light of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission intend to put forward a European strategy to regulate this issue and help eradicate ageism?
    • 2.What is the Commission’s position concerning the need to push for a European directive on addressing ageism in service provision?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Implementation of the Migration Pact in the context of the Polish Government’s position – temporary protection and financial contributions – P-001105/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-001105/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Waldemar Buda (ECR)

    In view of the Polish Government’s position of 4 February 2025 regarding the refusal to implement the Migration Pact and the forced admission of migrants, and in view of the Commission’s answer to parliamentary question E-002557/2024[1], I would like to ask the following question:

    Is the definition of temporary protection met by allowing a third-country national to enter the country to seek protection from war?

    Since the number of people benefiting from temporary protection is an important factor in assessing whether a Member State is facing a significant migration situation, and since countries are free to choose between different forms of solidarity (relocation, financial contributions, etc.), please answer the following:

    Is the definition of financial contributions met by the costs incurred through the payment of social benefits?

    Please provide the methodology for assessing the risk of migratory pressure, being under migratory pressure, or facing a significant migratory situation.

    Submitted: 14.3.2025

    • [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-10-2024-002557-ASW_EN.pdf
    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Arrest of the Mayor of Istanbul, Ekrem İmamoğlu – E-001163/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001163/2025
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Sakis Arnaoutoglou (S&D), Yannis Maniatis (S&D), Nikos Papandreou (S&D)

    On 19 March 2025, the Turkish authorities arrested the Mayor of Istanbul, Ekrem İmamoğlu, along with around 100 other people, including journalists and business executives. The accusations against him include leadership of a criminal organisation, bribery, manipulating public tenders and aiding a terrorist organisation. The day before his arrest, his degree was annulled in a politically motivated decision, effectively barring him from running in the Turkish presidential elections.

    His arrest and this decision come at a time when the Mayor of Istanbul is considered to be one of President Erdoğan’s main political rivals and was a favourite in the primary elections of the Republican People’s Party for the upcoming presidential elections. These developments have raised serious concerns about the transparency of the judicial process, respect for democratic procedures, the situation of the rule of law and freedom of the press in Türkiye.

    In view of the above, and given the fact that Türkiye holds EU candidate country status, can the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy say:

    • 1.Is the arrest of the Mayor of Istanbul compatible with Türkiye’s status as a candidate country and how does she intend to react?
    • 2.What additional measures does the EU intend to take to ensure that Türkiye respects democratic principles, the rule of law and human rights?
    • 3.In light of the latest developments, does the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative consider Türkiye to be a reliable partner for the EU?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Implementation of the revised Waste Framework Directive – criteria for extended producer responsibility fees for textiles – E-001171/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001171/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Billy Kelleher (Renew)

    The revised Waste Framework Directive (WFD) (2008/98/EC) proposes the introduction of eco-modulated extended producer responsibility (EPR) fees for textile waste. Recital 40 states that ‘industrial and commercial practices (…) influence the length of use of the product and the likelihood of a product to become waste’. It also states that to ‘characterise these practices and allow for eco-modulation of EPR fees’, Member States could consider a range of criteria.

    Article 22c(3a) provides that Member States may require the producer responsibility organisations to modulate the financial contribution. Article 22c(4) instructs the Commission to propose implementing acts laying down the fee modulation criteria for the application. There remains uncertainty about how recital 40 and the implementing acts interact in shaping EPR fees, as well as how they will interrelate with the delegated acts for apparel and footwear under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR).

    Can the Commission therefore explain:

    • 1.the relationship between recital 40 and Articles 22c(3a) and 22c(4) ?
    • 2.how it intends to align the implementation of EPR fee modulation criteria through its implementing acts under the WFD with the ESPR delegated act for apparel/footwear?
    • 3.whether it will conduct an impact assessment before adopting the implementing acts on fee modulation criteria, and if so, what specific aspects it will evaluate?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Türkiye’s entry into the European Defence Industry must be prevented – E-001014/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001014/2025
    to the Council
    Rule 144
    Geadis Geadi (ECR)

    Since December 2024, there have been reports that the Turkish company Baykar, a drone manufacturer, has agreed to purchase the Italian company Piaggio Aerospace. The Turkish company itself made an announcement, stating that the Italian Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy has approved the sale. Daily Sabah even adds that ‘the closing of the transaction is expected in spring once a series of conditions have been met, including authorisation from the Italian Presidency of the Council of Ministers.’ Baykar, in its announcement, states that with this acquisition it is ready to expand its influence in the European aviation market. At the same time, Baykar also seems to be heading towards a cooperation agreement with the defence and aerospace company Leonardo, which is also Italian.

    With regard to the above:

    • 1.What is the Council’s view of the matter, given that this constitutes Türkiye’s entry into the European Defence Industry?
    • 2.How does the Council comment on this at a time when voices within the European Union are calling on the European institutions to impose an embargo on the sale of European arms to Türkiye?

    Submitted: 10.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Marathonisi – Protection of the Caretta caretta sea turtle – E-001168/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001168/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sakis Arnaoutoglou (S&D)

    Marathonisi, one of the most valuable habitats of the Caretta caretta sea turtle in the Mediterranean, is directly threatened by illegal construction work. Despite the area’s strict legal protection status, the Zakynthos Building Service issued a building permit ignoring the presidential decree prohibiting construction in the area. The work, which includes deforestation, construction of a platform and the use of heavy machinery, has devastated the natural environment, stripped land and violated the park’s protection conditions, causing serious disruption to the ecosystem and threatening the Caretta caretta nesting season.

    In view of the above and given that Marathonisi is part of the Natura 2000 network and is protected by the Habitats Directive (92/43/EEC):

    • 1.Does the Commission consider that the issuance of the building permit and the construction work constitute a breach of EU environmental legislation?
    • 2.Does the Commission intend to investigate the complaints and seek explanations from the Greek authorities?
    • 3.How does the Commission intend to strengthen the monitoring and implementation of European environmental legislation in Greece in order to prevent similar illegal interference?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Transformation of the EU – from peace project to war economy – E-001164/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001164/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Petra Steger (PfE)

    On 4 March 2025, Commission President von der Leyen announced her ‘ReArm Europe’ plan. The aim is to mobilise up to EUR 800 billion by activating the national escape clause under the Stability and Growth Pact and by taking on mutualised debt in breach of the Treaty. In doing so, the Commission is not only driving forward the debt Union and the erosion of national sovereignty in an impressive fashion, but is also transforming the EU from a former peacemaker into an actor of war. The most recent statements by EPP group leader Manfred Weber, according to which Europe must move towards becoming a military economy and put in place a common European command to command the rearmed national armies, are also illustrative of this shift. The zeitgeist of peace-destroying bellicosity that is rampant in Brussels is thus heading for an alarming climax, while the rest of the world – with the USA under President Trump leading the way – is focussing on an imminent peaceful solution.

    • 1.In the light of the EU’s erstwhile peace objectives, how does the Commission justify the gradual destruction of national sovereignty and the mutualisation of debt for military purposes in breach of the Treaty?
    • 2.Is the Commission pursuing the goal of a war-oriented economy and the establishment of a central command over national armies?
    • 3.Is it not irresponsible for the Commission to be preparing for a military escalation with Russia while the USA is striving for an early peace agreement with that very country?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Review of Regulation (EU) 2024/573 on F-gases and its meaning for the European heat pump and cooling sector – E-001165/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001165/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dan-Ştefan Motreanu (PPE)

    Regulation (EU) 2024/573 on fluorinated greenhouse gases, also known as the F-gas Regulation, envisages a complete phaseout of F-gases in several industrial applications, including in stationary air conditioning and heat pumps, despite them being one of the crucial components of this equipment.

    With over 250 manufacturing facilities across approximately 20 Member States, the European heat pump sector not only supports our continent’s energy security but also significantly contributes to regional employment.

    However, this positive impact is threatened by regulatory uncertainty. Article 35(5) of the F-gas Regulation states that the actual phaseout of F-gases depends on the results of an evaluation of available technologies and their effectiveness, which should be carried out by the Commission by 2030. This means that for the next five years, producers will be uncertain about what kind of production lines to invest in. This is another example of the unintended consequences of European regulation, which decreases European competitiveness.

    With regard to Article 35(5) and given the importance of the heat pump sector for employment, competitiveness, energy security and innovation in Europe, would the Commission consider an earlier review of the F-gas Regulation, the proposed ban on F-gases, and available technologies with low global warming potential, to take place as early as 2025 or 2026?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Effects of US tariffs and EU countermeasures on the North of Ireland – E-001175/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001175/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Lynn Boylan (The Left), Kathleen Funchion (The Left)

    The recently announced US tariffs and EU countermeasures will pose unique challenges for the North of Ireland in the context of the Windsor Framework.

    Has the Commission:

    • 1.Engaged with the Executive Office on the tariffs and countermeasures?
    • 2.Conducted an impact assessment on the specific effects of the tariffs and countermeasures on the North of Ireland?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Approval of the Altri environmental impact statement – E-001176/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001176/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Isabel Serra Sánchez (The Left)

    The Xunta de Galicia approved the environmental impact statement for the Altri large-scale cellulose plant in Palas de Rei (Lugo), which will consume 1.2 million tonnes of eucalyptus per year and 46 000 cubic metres of water from the river Ulla every day, all on land bordering the Serra do Careón – a Natura 2000 site. The aim is to produce 400 000 tonnes of cellulose per year and a further 200 000 tonnes of vegetable textile fibre. However, the project lacks an assessment of the ‘do no significant harm’ principle, which is indispensable to access European funds linked to the Recovery and Resilience Facility. According to Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852, an economic activity is sustainable only if it does not significantly harm the environmental objectives set by the Union. Moreover, the Green Deal sets as investment priorities those projects that contribute substantially to climate change mitigation and promote technological and environmental innovation. However, this is not the case for this project.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.Will the Commission look into the failure of the Altri project to comply with environmental directives?
    • 2.Will the Commission allow the use of European funds for a project that is not in line with the objectives of the European Green Deal?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU regulatory environment, artificial intelligence and competitiveness – E-001181/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001181/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Michalis Hadjipantela (PPE)

    The Commission has been clear since the beginning of its term of office that the competitiveness of the EU economy is a key priority for this term. Yet, the EU regulatory environment remains fragmented and inconsistent, and is preventing new technologies from reaching Europe. Companies do not have clarity on how to comply with the specific requirements of EU rules and continue to face barriers to entering our market. For example, the world’s leading artificial intelligence (AI) and technology developers have withheld the latest cutting-edge products from the EU, blaming this on the EU’s strict and incoherent interpretation of rules, particularly related to privacy, data protection and competition.

    • 1.Does the Commission agree that the current regulatory environment is preventing EU consumers, businesses and the public sector from accessing innovation at the same pace as the rest of the world, therefore contributing to limiting EU competitiveness?
    • 2.How does the Commission plan to address these regulatory roadblocks and prevent the EU from falling further behind on innovation, including in the global AI race, while maintaining data protection and privacy?
    • 3.Will the Commission promote the right to innovate in the EU and push for a competitiveness check for existing and new regulatory initiatives?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Measures announced by the Commission in its communication on e-commerce – E-001161/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001161/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Pierre Jouvet (S&D)

    Over the past three years, Europe has seen a huge influx in imported goods sent directly to consumers by e-commerce intermediaries. However, these products often do not comply with European safety standards or are subject to unfair trading practices. The volume of e-commerce products imported is doubling every year.

    To address this issue, on 5 February 2025 the Commission announced measures to make customs and market surveillance authorities more resilient and more effective.

    • 1.The reform of the Union Customs Code, the cornerstone of these proposals, is still under discussion. Given that progress on this is slow and that the current expected implementation date is 2028, will these measures not come too late?
    • 2.The Commission has proposed non-discriminatory handling fees for imported goods delivered directly to consumers. What would they consist of?
    • 3.Is the idea that the platforms would increase product prices so as to absorb these costs? If so, has the Commission considered the fact that these platforms are already selling at a loss, meaning that this measure would do nothing to dissuade them?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Potential for applying freedom of speech protections to content created or published through automated processes – E-001160/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001160/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Christine Anderson (ESN)

    Freedom of speech is of the utmost importance, particularly in an online context. Due to the digital medium, freedom of speech manifests itself in various new forms. For instance, automatically generated content published by news sites according to predefined rules and procedures, content collected from the internet and edited by artificial intelligence before publication (with or without human oversight) and user-generated content. Consequently, the question arises regarding the potential for applying freedom of speech protections to content created or published through automated processes.

    • 1.Does the Commission agree that automatically generated and published content following rules established by humans falls under the principle of freedom of speech, thereby making existing legal protections fully applicable?
    • 2.Provided they are not controlled by fully autonomous artificial general intelligence, does the Commission agree that content generated by human-designed bots should also enjoy freedom of speech protections, as these operate based on rules created by individuals who themselves possess freedom of speech?
    • 3.Does the Commission acknowledge that distinguishing between online bots and humans can often be very challenging, and in cases of uncertainty, does it further agree that online expressions should by default be considered human authored and thus fully protected under freedom of speech principles, unless there is clear evidence to the contrary?

    Submitted: 19.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 1,086 1,087 1,088 1,089 1,090 … 1,780
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress