Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Urgent steps to secure the release of Dr Gubad Ibadoghlu – P-002959/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has repeatedly voiced its concerns regarding the intensification of repression against civil society, political opponents and independent media in Azerbaijan.

    In this context, the EU continues to raise the case of Dr Ibadoghlu, both in direct contacts with the authorities and in public statements, urging the authorities to lift his travel ban in order for him to obtain the urgent medical attention he requires abroad[1].

    Moreover, the EU Delegation in Azerbaijan and the EU Special Representative for Human Rights have repeatedly raised his case with the Azerbaijani authorities.

    The EU Delegation is also in direct contact with Dr Ibadoghlu and his lawyers, and regularly attends the court hearings in his case.

    Moreover, on the occasion of his official visit to Azerbaijan in October 2024, the Commissioner for Climate Action met Dr Ibadoghlu.

    The EU Delegation also facilitated the organisation of a meeting between Dr Ibadoghlu and the European Parliament Delegation, which visited Baku in November 2024 during the Conference of the Parties ( COP29).

    The EU is committed to phasing out its energy dependency on Russia, including through the transition from fossil fuels to renewable sources of energy and efforts to diversify the supply of energy imports.

    • [1] https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/azerbaijan-statement-spokesperson-human-rights-situation_en; https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-10-2024-10-22-ITM-020_EN.html; https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/CRE-10-2024-12-18-ITM-019-03_EN.html
    Last updated: 25 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Restructuring of EEAS Delegations abroad – P-002704/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU Delegations play an essential role in the EU’s representation on the global stage. They are at the frontline of the EU relationships and outreach with partners globally and a key asset for the EU, its institutions and Member States.

    In the context of reduced budgetary resources for the European External Action Service (EEAS) and the new priorities and policies of the EU, it is necessary to ensure that the Delegations network is able to effectively deliver, including with proper expertise in the field.

    This work is ongoing. There is a need for further analysis and to explore different options, to ensure the highest effectiveness of the EU’s presence in the world in the current complex geopolitical context. No option has been endorsed yet.

    In her appearance before the Committee on Budgetary Control (2023 EEAS discharge), the High Representative/Vice-President stated that, in principle, no EU Delegations would close, while underlining that the EEAS effectiveness and efficiency could be further improved. The 145 EU Delegations are key for the implementation of EU policies.

    The current multi-annual financial framework was built on stable staffing and no more than a 2% annual increase for non-salary expenditure. This is very challenging in the recent economic climate, and the EEAS has argued that the MFF parameters are not taking into consideration inflation outside the EU (close to 20%) which is a unique position and costs are linked to maintain a worldwide presence through the network of Delegations.

    Thanks to the strong and much welcome support from the European Parliament, the Budgetary Authority agreed to grant more than the 2% standard increase to the EEAS in the 2025 budget procedure.

    This will allow for some critical infrastructure work to be carried out in 2025. However, continued austerity measures and search for efficiencies and redeployments will continue in 2025, which may also require adaptations of the EU’s diplomatic network.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Delays in the payment of compensatory fees from hydroelectric projects in Greece – E-000149/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission takes note of the information provided on the situation in Greece. The imposition of compensatory (reciprocal) fees could be one way to consider the needs of local population and share the benefits of the green transition .

    Moreover, Article 15d (2) of the revised Renewable Energy Directive[1], with transposition deadline on 21 May 2025, obliges Member States to adopt measures to promote public acceptance of renewable energy projects by means of direct and indirect participation of local communities in those projects.

    The application of compensatory (reciprocal) fees, depends on the specific rules in the relevant national legislation. Non or incorrect application of national legislation must be brought up and decided before national courts.

    Given the need to adjust to national and local circumstances, a ‘one size fits all’ solution has not been identified in this area.

    The Commission will continue to promote the exchange of best practices among Member States, including via the upcoming Citizens Energy Package and engagement in regional high-level groups[2].

    • [1] Directive (EU) 2023/2413 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001, Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and Directive 98/70/EC as regards the promotion of energy from renewable sources, and repealing Council Directive (EU) 2015/652 (OJ L, 2023/24, 31.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/2413/oj).
    • [2] https://energy.ec.europa.eu/topics/infrastructure/high-level-groups_en
    Last updated: 25 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Pain and non-communicable diseases – E-002948/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission recognises the importance of integrated patient care pathways in addressing non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and associated chronic pain.

    For example, the joint action JACARDI[1] on cardiovascular diseases and diabetes aims to improve patient care pathways and address all aspects of a patient’s health, including chronic pain.

    The Commission will step up its efforts on preventive health ensuring a comprehensive approach to health promotion and disease prevention[2].

    The first exchange of views on these new priorities was held with the Expert Group on Public Health[3] on 30 January 2025. This provided the opportunity to discuss how the Commission can best and most effectively support Member States in preventing and managing NCDs, and associated conditions like chronic pain.

    The Commission recognises the need to develop solutions to efficiently tackle chronic pain. Two call topics[4] were recently opened under the Horizon Europe Programme[5] including one linked to the scoping review[6] that offered researchers in the pain area an opportunity to apply for research funding.

    Horizon Europe will continue to offer opportunities for research funding, as call topics are broad enough to accommodate for pain research.

    • [1] https://jacardi.eu/
    • [2] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/b628b5a2-ac1e-4b9c-bbdd-35b82da0ac6b_en?filename=mission-letter-varhelyi.pdf
    • [3] https://health.ec.europa.eu/non-communicable-diseases/expert-group-public-health_en
    • [4] These topics included: ‘Tackling high burden for patients, under-researched medical conditions’ https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/topic-details/horizon-hlth-2024-disease-03-14-two-stage and ‘Novel approaches for palliative and end-of life care for non-cancer patients’ https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/portal/screen/opportunities/topic-details/horizon-hlth-2023-disease-03-01
    • [5] https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en
    • [6] https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/eae32303-96e3-11ed-b508-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
    Last updated: 25 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – WHO international health regulations and pandemic treaty – E-002841/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission sees the negotiations of the Pandemic Agreement (PA) and the amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) as important opportunities to address gaps exposed by COVID-19.

    In line with the negotiating directives (addendum to Council Decision (EU) 2022/451[1]), the Commission, negotiating on behalf of the Union, prioritises prevention, including the One Health approach.

    The aim is to strengthen prevention, preparedness and response (PPPR) to pandemics and other public health emergencies. No PA proposal or agreed amendments to the IHR affect the Member States’ responsibilities for the definition of their health policy and for the organisation and delivery of health services and medical care as enshrined in the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU[2]. Sovereignty stands as a guiding principle in the PA proposal and remains unchanged in the amended IHR.

    No new specific ‘PPPR mechanism’ is foreseen under either instrument. The amended IHR created the Coordinating Financial Mechanism which will support the identification of, and access to financing. Many Commission initiatives support and contribute[3] to PPPR, including participation in the Pandemic Fund.

    The Commission committed EUR 427 million to the Pandemic Fund[4], and the Fund aims at increasing health system resilience and adapting to local contexts, with a One Health approach.

    The Commission has three priorities in the 2022 Global Health Strategy[5]: deliver better health and well-being; strengthen health systems and advance universal health coverage; and prevent and combat health threats, including pandemics, applying a One Health approach.

    • [1] Council Decision (EU) 2022/451 of 3 March 2022 authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for an international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response, as well as complementary amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005).), OJ L 92, 21.3.2022, p. 1.
    • [2] Article 168(7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU.
    • [3] Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, GPEI-Global Polio Eradication Initiative, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, programmes for health with partner countries and regions.
    • [4] This represents 7.9% of EU commitments to global health development assistance (2021-2027).
    • [5] https://health.ec.europa.eu/internationalcooperation/global-health_en
    Last updated: 25 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Tackling the unfair competition posed by Turkish agricultural products – E-000220/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Trade in agricultural products between the Union and Türkiye is governed by Decision No 1/98 of the EC-Turkey Association Council[1].

    Decision 1/95 of the Association Council[2] reaffirms the common objective to move towards the free movement of agricultural products between themselves. Increasing tariffs on agricultural products imported from Türkiye would go against this objective.

    The Commission can use trade defence instruments to tackle unfairly dumped or subsidised imports of such products. The complaints office of the Directorate-General for Trade can provide advice[3].

    Food safety is a priority for the Commission. Food products placed on the EU market, regardless of their origin, must comply with the Union food safety legislation. Member States carry out official controls at all stages of production, processing and distribution, including at import.

    Where food of non-animal origin from third countries poses a risk, the Commission takes measures through Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1793[4] which include checks and special conditions governing the entry into the Union of certain food and feed of non-animal origin from certain third countries. These measures are periodically reviewed taking into account new information from Member States related to risks and instances of non-compliance.

    In addition, the Commission regularly performs audits in Member States and in third countries, to ensure that the relevant products comply with EU rules. The reports of those audits are published, including the actions taken to address the reports’ recommendations[5]. The Commission follows up on these actions.

    The Commission is not aware of any specific issues with Turkish products in Member States.

    • [1] OJ L86, 20.3.1998, p.1 — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dec/1998/223/oj/eng
    • [2] OJ L35, 13.2.1996, p.1 — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52012PC0092
    • [3] Email contact: trade-defence-complaints@ec.europa.eu
    • [4] OJ L 277, 29.10.2019, p. 89 — https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_impl/2019/1793/oj
    • [5] https://ec.europa.eu/food/audits-analysis/audit-report
    Last updated: 25 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Decarbonisation investments in the steel sector – E-002694/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The hydrogen and decarbonised gas market package[1] sets a clear framework for the development of infrastructure and the revised Renewable Energy Directive[2] creates obligations for the consumption of renewable hydrogen in industry and transport. When transposing them, Member States should put in place incentives for the sectors.

    In 2023, the Commission identified 65 European priority hydrogen infrastructure projects[3], that can benefit from funding under the Connecting Europe Facility and accelerated permitting. The Commission launched the second European Hydrogen Bank auction on 3 December 2024[4], next to Innovation Fund calls[5].

    In line with Article 30 (2) of Regulation (EU) 2023/956, the Commission will in 2025 assess a potential scope extension of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM).

    This includes an assessment of goods further down the value chain, goods at risk of carbon leakage other than those listed in Annex I of the CBAM Regulation and other input materials.

    On this basis, the Commission will prepare, where appropriate, a legislative proposal, including an impact assessment, on extending the scope of the regulation.

    Member States can prioritise sectors for potential future Important Projects of Common European Interest (IPCEIs). Several approved IPCEIs[6] have benefitted the steel industry’s green transition through renewable hydrogen.

    In addition, the Guidelines for Climate, Environmental Protection and Energy and the Temporary Crisis and Transition Framework allow Member States to notify individual aid measures[7] and aid schemes supporting industrial decarbonisation[8] or renewable hydrogen production or carbon capture and storage.

    • [1] Directive (EU) 2024/1788 and  Regulation (EU) 2024/1789 .
    • [2]  Directive (EU) 2023/2413.
    • [3] Projects of Common Interest and Projects of Mutual Interest, including ~20,000km of pipelines, storages, terminals, and electrolysers: C/2023/7930 final.
    • [4] EUR 1.2 billion of EU funds and up to EUR 836 million from Spain, Lithuania, and Austria for projects in their Member State.
    • [5] Two H2 DRI projects producing and consuming large volumes of H2 have already been awarded under the Innovation Fund, ‘HYBRIT’ (Sweden) https://ec.europa.eu/assets/cinea/project_fiches/innovation_fund/101051316.pdf) and ‘H2Green Steel’ (Sweden) (https://ec.europa.eu/assets/cinea/project_fiches/innovation_fund/101133206.pdf).
    • [6] ‘Hy2Tech’ (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_4544), ‘Hy2Infra’ (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_789) and ‘Hy2Use’ (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_5676).
    • [7] See an example: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_5968
    • [8] For instance a German scheme (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_845) and an Austrian scheme (https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_4746).

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Funding of Islamist associations by the Commission – E-002581/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Following allegations regarding an Erasmus+ project[1] coordinated by Islamic Relief Germany in 2023, the German National Agency in charge of vocational education and training and adult education conducted thorough checks with the relevant German authorities and concluded that there were no relevant legal findings that would have justified to terminate the project in question.

    The Commission is politically committed and legally bound to ensure that no one receives EU funding if they are involved in criminal or unethical practices, terrorism-related offences or in other activities incompatible with EU values. The award of funds is conditional to the absence of any exclusion grounds as set out in Article 138 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509[2].

    The recent Financial Regulation recast[3] from September 2024 introduced an explicit ground under the Early Detection and Exclusion System to protect the EU values and exclude entities from receiving EU funds if they have engaged in activities contrary to the EU founding values[4], such as incitement to discrimination, hatred or violence, where it concludes that their integrity is impacted and affects or risks affecting their performance of legal commitments undertaken[5].

    The Commission will continue rigorous monitoring procedures through checks and follow-ups on compliance with EU values. The Commission will immediately act on any evidence, by implementing appropriate measures against unreliable entities, e.g. suspension of contract or payments, contract termination, recovery or exclusion from EU financing.

    • [1] https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/projects/search/details/2023-1-DE02-KA122-ADU-000127773
    • [2] Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2024 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (recast) (OJ L, 2024/2509, 26.9.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/2509/oj).
    • [3] https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/990fe2a6-8f52-11ef-a130-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
    • [4] These values are enshrined in Article 2 Treaty on the European Union and the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
    • [5] Article 138(1), point (c)(vi) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2024/2509 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2024 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union (recast), OJ L, 2024/2509, 26.9.2024.
    Last updated: 25 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – PFAS chemicals dumped in Ukraine – E-000767/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000767/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Jonas Sjöstedt (The Left), Hanna Gedin (The Left)

    The Ukrainian people have had to endure the most difficult of ordeals during Russia’s war of aggression. Repeated bombardments are tearing apart the country’s infrastructure, and today there is a shortage of equipment for maintaining civil and military preparedness. The EU has an important role to play in both the military and civil defence of Ukraine.

    It seems inconceivable, but, in spite of the war, European firms are now exploiting the shortages in Ukraine by dumping environmentally harmful substances in the country. Harmful and environmentally destructive PFAS ‘forever chemicals’ – the PFOA variant in this instance – are being sent to Ukraine, though they are now banned in the EU. This chiefly involves firefighting foams nearing their expiry date plus products for civilian use.

    It is many times more costly to destroy the materials safely than to send them to Ukraine. Consequently, children and adults in Ukraine are being exposed to chemicals that are adjudged to be too hazardous to be used in the EU. This is disgraceful and risks doing damage to Ukraine, which has already suffered enormous environmental degradation as a result of the war.

    With that in mind:

    • 1.What action is the Commission planning to take to ensure that European firms do not dump PFAS chemicals in Ukraine?
    • 2.How does the Commission intend to assist Ukraine in remediating PFAS chemicals that have already been used?

    Submitted: 19.2.2025

    Last updated: 25 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Making use of empty properties to alleviate pressure on the housing market – E-000771/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000771/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Ana Miranda Paz (Verts/ALE)

    Galicia is hitting a historic peak in the cost of new housing: more than EUR 2 000 per square metre in the city of La Coruña. It might seem that the housing crisis can be resolved by building more new properties, yet 28 % of homes in Galicia are sitting empty. Half of these are in rural areas where, sadly, people are unable to live due to a lack of jobs, transport and basic services such as doctors. The rest are in cities along the Galician coast – such as Vigo (21 %) and La Coruña (23.2 %) – which are experiencing high rental prices, an increase in the cost of new homes and considerable pressure from holiday rentals.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.What measures is the Commission considering to take advantage of those homes that are sitting empty in areas with tight markets and/or intense pressure from tourism?
    • 2.Has it considered encouraging owners to rent out their empty properties via incentives from the cohesion funds or bodies such as the European Investment Bank? Or does it believe instead that deterrents would be a more successful means of ensuring that those properties can be utilised?

    Submitted: 19.2.2025

    Last updated: 25 February 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Appeal following attempted rape in Tower Hamlets

    Source: United Kingdom London Metropolitan Police

    Detectives investigating an attempted rape in Limehouse have released a CCTV image of a man they need to identify as part of their enquiries.

    An investigation has been ongoing since the incident – which took place inside a social and health club on Commercial Road, E14 between 17:00hrs and 18:00hrs on Monday, 17 February – was reported to police.

    It is alleged that a man tried to rape the victim, a man in his 20s.

    The suspect is described as a man in his mid to late 50s.

    Detective Sergeant Stacey Smith, from the Central East Public Protection Team, said: “This was a terrifying experience for the victim, who continues to be supported by specialist officers.

    “We are seeking the help of the public to identify the man in this image. Do you recognise him? Did you see him in the area that night? If you believe you know who he is don’t approach him directly, contact police.”

    Anyone with information is asked to call 101 quoting CAD 3226/25Feb. To remain anonymous contact the independent charity Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: RELEASE: Senator Mullin Slams Democrat Falsely Blaming Trump for Biden’s Disastrous Withdrawal from Afghanistan

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator MarkWayne Mullin (R-Oklahoma)

    RELEASE: Senator Mullin Slams Democrat Falsely Blaming Trump for Biden’s Disastrous Withdrawal from Afghanistan

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Markwayne Mullin (R-OK), a member of the Senate Armed Service Committee, responded to Democrat Senator Tim Kaine’s (D-VA) comments falsely blaming President Trump for former President Joe Biden’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan during the confirmation hearing for Deputy Defense Secretary Nominee Stephen A. Feinberg. During his remarks, the Senator also debunked false claims on the administration’s effort to shrink the federal government, and the U.S. posture towards Russia amid peace negotiations.
    “The disastrous withdrawal came 100% from the Biden administration. And American lives were left behind, and are still dying because of it,” said Senator Mullin. “And you’re going to sit there with a straight face and try to say that it was President Trump’s fault?”

    Watch the senator’s full remarks here.
    Highlights below:
    “And then, as the Senator that just asked questions wanted to bring up the Afghanistan withdrawal. Brother, that’s very, very close to me. That hits home. And you’re going to lay the withdrawal on President Trump, and say it was his fault?”
    “The Biden administration threw out the entire withdrawal plan that the Trump administration had and decided to go their own way. And man, wasn’t that great?” 
    “And then we’re going to start talking about President Trump not calling a bully out, like Putin. Do we forget what happened in 2017 when Trump 100% told Russia to stay out of Syria, not to be involved, especially with the bombing of Assad’s own people? And when they did, President Trump, within 30 minutes, took out the airfield that they operated out of, destroyed it, and then took back the airspace, and we had the airspace in Syria all the way up until Biden took office and we gave it back to Putin.”
    “Do we want to go back to Israel and Hamas and discuss the way the Biden administration handled that? And the way they refused to call Hamas a terrorist organization, and the Houthis a terrorist organization, and Iran a terrorist organization. And you’re going to sit there with a straight face and actually say that about President Trump?”
    “Are we serious saying that President Trump isn’t willing to stand up to a bully when underneath his administration, was the only time that Russia didn’t advance into Ukraine, because [Putin] did it underneath Obama, when they took Crimea and they did it underneath Biden, because they didn’t respect him, because of the disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. And every expert will tell you that.”
    “The President is bringing back hostages. He also brought back the hostage that Biden left behind, and he didn’t give up one thing to Russia, including a guy that was highly, highly considered a threat to the world… Doctor death, that we that we decided to trade for. And I’m sure you guys thought that was a good trade.” 
    “Guys, give me a break. We’re trying to advance America’s agenda and do what’s best for this country, and the American people agree with the direction we’re going.” 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Council to consult on Private hire car driver knowledge testing

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    Members of The Highland Council’s Licensing Committee have agreed that the Council will undertake a public consultation before deciding whether to introduce knowledge testing for private hire car (PHC) drivers in The Highland Council area.

    Under the Civic Government (Scotland) Act 1982 and the Air Weapons and Licensing (Scotland) Act 2015, Highland Council has long imposed knowledge testing requirements on applicants for a taxi driver’s licence. In 2016, the Highland Licensing Committee deferred a decision on introducing knowledge testing of applicants for a PHC driver’s licence.

    Following concerns raised by stakeholders and the trade, the Highland Licensing Committee is now revisiting the 2016 decision to defer the introduction of knowledge testing for private hire car (PHC) drivers in The Highland Council area.

    A public consultation will now take place to gather views on the following questions:

    1. Should knowledge testing be required only in the case of applicants for a new PHC driver’s licence? In other words, should existing holders of a PHC driver’s licence be exempt from the requirement to pass a knowledge test when they come to renew their licence?
    2. Should the knowledge test for PHC drivers be identical to the two part knowledge test used for taxi drivers and should the pass mark and allowance for number of attempts be the same?
    3. From what date should the requirement for PHC driver knowledge testing come into effect?

    The consultation will be promoted by the Council accordingly and a further report will be brought back to the Highland Licensing Committee for Members consideration.

    25 Feb 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murphy, 17 Colleagues Lead Bipartisan Resolution Supporting Ukraine on Third Anniversary of Russia’s Full-Scale Invasion

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Connecticut – Chris Murphy

    February 24, 2025

    WASHINGTON—U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), Ranking Member of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on Europe and Regional Security Cooperation, on Monday joined 17 of his Senate colleagues in supporting a bipartisan resolution acknowledging the third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The resolution expresses the U.S. Senate’s unwavering support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity while condemning Russia’s illegal aggression and attempts to seize Ukrainian territory. It also commends NATO, the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, and the international community for their continued efforts to support Ukraine’s defense and the protection of human rights on its territory; recognizes Ukraine’s democratic progress during wartime; and emphasizes Ukraine’s right to be included in any discussions with Russia about its future.
    U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.), John Curtis (R-Utah), Chris Coons (D-Del.), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Susan Collins (R-Maine), John Cornyn (R-Texas), and Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) also cosponsored the resolution.
    Full text of the resolution can be found HERE and below:
    RESOLUTION acknowledging the third anniversary of Russia’s further invasion of Ukraine and expressing support for the people of Ukraine.
    Whereas, on February 24, 2022, Russia launched a full-scale, unprovoked, and illegal invasion of Ukraine, which followed Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its illegal occupation of parts of the Donbas region in 2014;
    Whereas the international community recognizes the sovereignty and full territorial integrity of Ukraine within the 1991 borders; and
    Whereas the Ukrainian Armed Forces and the people of Ukraine have demonstrated a determined resistance that has prevented Russia from taking control of their country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the Senate—(1) expresses continued solidarity with the people of Ukraine and condolences for the loss of tens of thousands of Ukrainian people to Russian aggression;
    (2) rejects Russia’s attempts to militarily seize sovereign territory in Ukraine and elsewhere in Europe;
    (3) reaffirms the support of the United States for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine;
    (4) commends NATO, the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, and the international community for their continued efforts to support Ukraine’s defense and the protection of human rights on its territory;
    (5) supports Ukraine’s aspirations to integrate into Euro-Atlantic structures;
    (6) recognizes Ukraine’s efforts to strengthen its democracy during wartime;
    (7) encourages the transatlantic community to continue to denounce Russia’s illegal and unprovoked war in Ukraine and counter Russian aggression; and
    (8) emphasizes that Ukraine must be a partici2 pant in discussions with the Russian Federation 3 about Ukraine’s future.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Budget Bill passed

    Source: Scottish Government

    Parliament approves spending plans.

    The 2025-26 Scottish Budget has been approved by Parliament, including £21.7 billion for health & social care and more than £15 billion for local councils, alongside social security measures supporting an estimated two million people.

    The Budget invests:

    • £21.7 billion in health and social care services, including almost £200 million to cut waiting times and help reduce delayed discharge
    • £6.9 billion in social security, expected to support around two million people in 2025‑26
    • £4.9 billion in climate-positive investment
    • more than £7 billion for infrastructure
    • more than £2 billion for colleges, universities and the wider skills system
    • an additional £25 million to support the Grangemouth Industrial Cluster, taking total investment to almost £90 million

    Finance Secretary Shona Robison said:

    “I am pleased that Parliament has approved the Scottish Government’s Budget – confirming plans to invest in public services, lift children out of poverty, act in the face of the climate emergency and support jobs and economic growth.

    “This is a Budget by Scotland for Scotland. It includes record NHS investment, social security spending to put money in the pockets of low income families and action to effectively scrap the two-child benefit cap next year. We are delivering a universal winter heating payment for the elderly, providing record funding for local government and increasing investment in affordable housing.

    “This Budget has been developed through effective engagement and negotiation across Parliament to build broad support. It is through this compromise that we are delivering spending plans that will most effectively strengthen services and support Scotland’s communities.” 

    Background 

    Scottish Budget 2025 to 2026

    Budget (Scotland) (No. 4) Bill

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: Alabama Man Sentenced to Five Years in Prison for Violating U.S. Sanctions on Iran

    Source: US State of Vermont

    Ray Hunt, also known as Abdolrahman Hantoosh, Rahman Hantoosh, and Rahman Natooshas, 71, of Owens Cross Roads, Alabama, has been sentenced to five years in prison for violating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. In July 2024, Hunt pleaded guilty to conspiring to export U.S.-origin goods to the Islamic Republic of Iran in violation of the U.S. trade sanctions.

    According to court documents, in May 2014, Hunt registered Vega Tools LLC with the Alabama Secretary of State, listing the nature of the business as “the purchase/resale of equipment for the energy sector.” He operated Vega Tools, including purchasing, receiving, and shipping U.S.-origin goods, from locations in Madison County, Alabama. Beginning at least as early as 2015 and continuing to the time of his arrest in November 2022, Hunt conspired with two Iranian companies located in Tehran, Iran, to illegally export U.S.-manufactured industrial equipment for use in Iran’s oil, gas, and petrochemical industries.

    Hunt engaged in a series of deceptive practices to avoid detection by U.S. authorities, including using third-party transshipment companies in Turkey and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and routing payments through UAE banks, as well as lying to shipping companies about the value of his exports to prevent the filing of Electronic Export Information to U.S. authorities. Hunt lied to suppliers and shippers by claiming the items he purchased on behalf of the Iranian co-conspirators were destined for end-users in Turkey and UAE, while knowing the exports were ultimately destined for Iran. Hunt also lied to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers regarding the nature and existence of his business when questioned upon his return from a March 2020 trip to Iran.   

    Sue Bai, head of the Justice Department’s National Security Division; U.S. Attorney Prim F. Escalona for the Northern District of Alabama; Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement John Sonderman of the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS); and Assistant Director Kevin Vorndran of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division announced the sentence.

    BIS investigated the case with valuable assistance provided by the FBI.

    Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jonathan Cross and Henry Cornelius for the Northern District of Alabama and Trial Attorneys Emma Ellenrieder and Adam Barry of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section prosecuted the case.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Alabama Man Sentenced to Five Years in Prison for Violating U.S. Sanctions on Iran

    Source: United States Attorneys General 1

    Ray Hunt, also known as Abdolrahman Hantoosh, Rahman Hantoosh, and Rahman Natooshas, 71, of Owens Cross Roads, Alabama, has been sentenced to five years in prison for violating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. In July 2024, Hunt pleaded guilty to conspiring to export U.S.-origin goods to the Islamic Republic of Iran in violation of the U.S. trade sanctions.

    According to court documents, in May 2014, Hunt registered Vega Tools LLC with the Alabama Secretary of State, listing the nature of the business as “the purchase/resale of equipment for the energy sector.” He operated Vega Tools, including purchasing, receiving, and shipping U.S.-origin goods, from locations in Madison County, Alabama. Beginning at least as early as 2015 and continuing to the time of his arrest in November 2022, Hunt conspired with two Iranian companies located in Tehran, Iran, to illegally export U.S.-manufactured industrial equipment for use in Iran’s oil, gas, and petrochemical industries.

    Hunt engaged in a series of deceptive practices to avoid detection by U.S. authorities, including using third-party transshipment companies in Turkey and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and routing payments through UAE banks, as well as lying to shipping companies about the value of his exports to prevent the filing of Electronic Export Information to U.S. authorities. Hunt lied to suppliers and shippers by claiming the items he purchased on behalf of the Iranian co-conspirators were destined for end-users in Turkey and UAE, while knowing the exports were ultimately destined for Iran. Hunt also lied to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers regarding the nature and existence of his business when questioned upon his return from a March 2020 trip to Iran.   

    Sue Bai, head of the Justice Department’s National Security Division; U.S. Attorney Prim F. Escalona for the Northern District of Alabama; Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Enforcement John Sonderman of the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS); and Assistant Director Kevin Vorndran of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division announced the sentence.

    BIS investigated the case with valuable assistance provided by the FBI.

    Assistant U.S. Attorneys Jonathan Cross and Henry Cornelius for the Northern District of Alabama and Trial Attorneys Emma Ellenrieder and Adam Barry of the National Security Division’s Counterintelligence and Export Control Section prosecuted the case.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Britain must lead on defence and aid

    Source: Liberal Democrats UK

    Today, the Prime Minister did what we’ve been urging him to do for years: commit to increasing Britain’s defence spending to 2.5% of GDP.

    That is essential. With Vladimir Putin waging war on our continent, and Donald Trump in the White House cosying up to him, this is the most perilous moment for Europe in my lifetime.

    Trump is threatening not only to betray the brave Ukrainian people, who have heroically resisted Putin’s war machine for the past three years, but also to undermine peace and security across Europe – including here in the UK.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: TRA proposes keeping measures on organic coated steel from China

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    TRA proposes keeping measures on organic coated steel from China

    The TRA has recommended extending anti-dumping and countervailing measures on organic coated steel imported from China until 2029.

    The Trade Remedies Authority (TRA) has today (Tuesday 25 February) published initial findings, proposing that anti-dumping and countervailing measures on organic coated steel (OCS) imported from China be maintained for an additional five years, until May 4, 2029.  

    In its Statements of Essential Facts (SEF), the TRA found that dumping and subsidisation would likely recur if the measures were removed, potentially causing injury to UK industry. The measures have been largely effective, usually keeping Chinese imports below 1,000 tonnes annually since 2013. Tata Steel UK (TSUK) is the sole producer of OCS in the UK, manufacturing it at the Shotton facility in North Wales. TSUK contributes approximately £222 million to the UK economy annually, including sales of OCS, and employs around 8,100 people across all its operations. 

    OCS is used to maintain the durability of various structures, especially in the construction industry, as well as in metal furniture, heating and ventilation ducting and casings and in several domestic appliances.  

    Current anti-dumping duties on Chinese OCS imports range from 5.9% to 26.1% while countervailing duties range from 13.7% to 44.7%, depending on the exporter. 

    Businesses that may be affected by these findings can submit comments to the TRA by 18 March 2025 and can do so through the TRA’s public file.

    Notes to editors 

    • The Trade Remedies Authority is the UK body that investigates whether new trade remedy measures are needed to counter unfair import practices and unforeseen surges of imports.  

    • Trade remedy investigations were carried out by the EU Commission on the UK’s behalf until the UK left the EU. A number of EU trade remedy measures of interest to UK producers were carried across into UK law when the UK left the EU and the TRA has been reviewing these to assess whether they are suitable for UK needs. 

    • Anti-dumping duties allow a country or union to act against goods which are being sold at less than their normal value – this is defined as the price for ‘like goods’ sold in the exporter’s home market. 

    • Countervailing, or subsidy duties counteract imports being subsidised by their place of origin that cause material injury to a domestic industry.  

    • This transition review was initiated on 15 April 2024, examining data from the period 1 April 2023 to 31 March 2024, with injury assessment covering 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2024.  

    • The Statement of Essential Facts (SEF) represents the TRA’s interim findings. All interested parties can submit comments before the TRA makes its final recommendation to the Secretary of State for Business and Trade.

    Updates to this page

    Published 25 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Global: Why Trump really wants Ukraine’s minerals – China has put theirs off limits

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Dafydd Townley, Teaching Fellow in International Security, University of Portsmouth

    Donald Trump is demanding reparations from Ukraine for the assistance that it has given to Kyiv during the Russian invasion. Trump has demanded Ukraine sign a US$500 billion (£394 billion) deal that would give the US access to, and revenue from, Ukraine’s rare and critical minerals, an essential resource in 21st century economy.

    Trump has said that this would form part of a repayment of the aid given by the US to Ukraine. Ukraine’s president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has so far refused to sign such an agreement stating that the aid was a grant and not a loan, as agreed by Trump’s predecessor Joe Biden and the Republican-controlled Congress.

    A key reason behind Trump’s push for this mineral deal is the US reliance on rare minerals such as gallium, which is critical for advanced defence technologies but is not readily available domestically.

    China, a leading supplier of gallium, has used its control over the resource as leverage against the US. It has imposed a ban on rare minerals being exported to the US, as part of its retaliation to increased US tariffs on Chinese goods.

    Other minerals are crucial for military technology such as missile system, electronics and electric vehicles. In Ukraine, there are deposits for 22 of the 34 minerals identified by the European Union as critical.

    The problem for the US is that China currently accounts for a high proportion of certain crticial mineral imports.

    So Trump sees a resolution to the Ukraine war as an opportunity to secure alternative sources of critical minerals, reducing US dependency on China and allowing Trump to take a more aggressive approach towards it. He also may not have predicted that China would hit back against the US tariffs with restrictions on these vital resources quite so quickly.

    Gallium is valued by the defence manufacturing industry because it is reliable and durable. In particular, the element is seen as a crucial tool enhancing radar, satellite communication systems, and electronic warfare systems. It is also used in multi-chip modules utilised by navigation and air traffic control systems.

    In addition to gallium, Ukraine has vast resources of graphite, an element that is used in the construction of electric vehicles and nuclear reactors, and a third of Europe’s supply of lithium, which is used in batteries.

    Trump’s focus on critical minerals has also influenced his interest in Greenland which possesses significant reserves of critical minerals, making it a potential alternative to Chinese-controlled resources.




    Read more:
    Trump’s Greenland bid is really about control of the Arctic and the coming battle with China


    Which minerals does Trump want?

    Why is China so important?

    Trump’s concern over China is also driving his negotiations with Russia more generally. One of Trump’s core concerns is China’s partnership with Russia. There is no doubt that China is now the dominant force in the Sino-Russian alliance.

    Given the increasing cooperation between the two nations in military, economic, and technological areas, Trump believes that China’s influence in global affairs needs to be countered aggressively. The Trump administration has sought to undermine the alliance by softening the US’s approach to Russia, a move that has shocked European leaders.

    Trump has long viewed China as the major threat to the US, considering it their biggest economic rival and a significant obstacle to making America “great again”.

    His economic policies have targeted Chinese trade practices, supply chain dependencies and geopolitical manoeuvres. One of his key trade advisers has argued American businesses are at a disadvantage from China’s state-controlled economy, intellectual property theft and trade imbalance.

    The recent tariffs imposed by the US on hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of Chinese imports, were intended to make US products more competitive by driving up the cost of Chinese imports, thereby encouraging businesses and consumers to buy domestic goods instead.

    At the same time, Trump sought to weaken China’s export economy by making it more difficult for Chinese companies to sell goods in the US. His tariff policies extended beyond China, with similar measures being considered for Europe.

    By targeting multiple regions, Trump aimed to shift global supply chains and solidify the US as a manufacturing powerhouse. By ending the war in Ukraine, Trump believes the US can redirect funds and resources used in Europe toward countering China’s growing influence.

    Trump has tried to justify the tariffs on China by claiming Chinese manufacturers are responsible for the mass production of fentanyl, which is then trafficked into the US through various channels. Trump has proposed stricter measures to curb the flow of fentanyl, including sanctions and tariffs on Chinese firms allegedly involved in its production.

    Following China’s retaliation, Trump needs peace in Ukraine and the consequential mineral agreement with Kyiv before China’s ban on exports to the US affects critical US manufacturing. Such an agreement would then allow him to take an even more aggressive posture with China with fewer consequences.

    However, Zelensky recently claimed that Russia has taken control of 20% of Ukraine’s minerals since the invasion. And it’s possible it will be years before any American investor gets any return on their money due to a chronic lack of investment in Ukraine’s minerals sector for almost a decade.

    Even if Trump does get the deal he wants, he will have to wait a while before Ukraine’s minerals will fulfil all of the US’s needs.

    Dafydd Townley does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Why Trump really wants Ukraine’s minerals – China has put theirs off limits – https://theconversation.com/why-trump-really-wants-ukraines-minerals-china-has-put-theirs-off-limits-250546

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: ‘I thought about escaping every day’: how survivors get out of Southeast Asia’s cybercrime compounds – Scam Factories podcast, Ep 3

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Gemma Ware, Host, The Conversation Weekly Podcast, The Conversation

    Every day that he was locked up in a scam compound in Southeast Asia, George thought about how to get out. “We looked for means of escaping, but it was hard,” he told The Conversation.

    George, whose name has been changed to protect his identity, managed to secretly contact a rescue organisation in Myanmar, where he was being held. That set in motion a chain of events that would eventually lead to his freedom, but it would take months before he made it back home to his family in Uganda.

    Hundreds of thousands of people like George are estimated to have been caught up in the brutal scamming industry in Southeast Asia, many forced into criminality against their will.

    Scam Factories is a podcast series from The Conversation Weekly taking you inside these brutal fraud compounds. It accompanies a series of multimedia articles on The Conversation.

    In our third and final episode, Great Escapes, we find out the different ways people manage to escape and at what costs, what it takes for them to get home, and what is being done to clamp down on the industry.

    The Conversation collaborated for this series with three researchers: Ivan Franceschini, a lecturer in Chinese Studies at the University of Melbourne; Ling Li, a PhD candidate at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, and Mark Bo, an independent researcher.

    They’ve spent the past few years researching the expansion of scam compounds in the region for a forthcoming book. They’ve interviewed nearly 100 survivors of the compounds, analysed maps and financial documents related to the scam industry and tracked scammers online to find out how these compounds work.

    Read an article by Ivan Franceschini and Ling Li which accompanies this episode.

    The Conversation contacted all the companies mentioned in this multimedia series for comment, except Jinshui who we could not contact. We did not receive a response from any of them.


    This episode was written and produced by Gemma Ware, with assistance from Mend Mariwany and Katie Flood. Leila Goldstein was our producer in Cambodia and Halima Athumani recorded for us in Uganda. Hui Lin helped us with Chinese translation. Sound design by Michelle Macklem and editing help from Ashlynee McGhee and Justin Bergman.

    Newsclips in this episodes are from CNA, Reuters and Al Jazeera English.

    Listen to The Conversation Weekly podcast via any of the apps listed above, download it directly via our RSS feed or find out how else to listen here.

    Mark Bo, an independent researcher who works with Ivan Franeschini and Ling Li, is also interviewed in this podcast series. Ivan, Ling, Mark, and others have co-founded EOS Collective, a non-profit organisation dedicated to investigating the criminal networks behind the online scam industry and supporting survivors.

    ref. ‘I thought about escaping every day’: how survivors get out of Southeast Asia’s cybercrime compounds – Scam Factories podcast, Ep 3 – https://theconversation.com/i-thought-about-escaping-every-day-how-survivors-get-out-of-southeast-asias-cybercrime-compounds-scam-factories-podcast-ep-3-250673

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM statement on defence spending: 25 February 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    PM statement on defence spending: 25 February 2025

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s press statement on increasing defence spending.

    Good evening. 

    I was a young man when the Berlin Wall came down

    I remember it vividly. 

    It felt as if we were casting off the shackles of history

    A continent united by freedom and democracy. 

    If you had told me then, that in my lifetime

    We would see Russian tanks rolling into European cities again

    I would not have believed you. 

    Yet here we are

    In a world where everything has changed

    Because three years ago, in Ukraine

    That is exactly what happened. 

    Just reflect on that for a second – I think it’s worth it. 

    Just imagine you are walking to work

    Taking your kids to school. 

    Just another February morning, like any other. 

    Then suddenly – missiles. 

    Sirens. 

    Explosions. 

    Not in the distance

    Not on TV

    In your town. 

    Hitting your community. 

    Killing your friends. 

    An invading army, in your country. 

    The people of Ukraine have woken up to this nightmare

    For three years now

    Their courage is inspiring. 

    And Britain can be proud of its response. 

    British families have opened their doors to fleeing Ukrainians

    The ‘yellow and light blue’ flag flies on town halls and churches, the length and breadth of this country

    And I will also put on record again – 

    That I respect the robust response taken by the previous government

    I supported it in opposition

    And we have built on it in government

    Taking our support for Ukraine – to record levels. 

    But, as the nature of that conflict changes

    As it has done in recent weeks

    It also brings our response into sharper focus.

    And I believe we must now change our approach to national security

    So we are ready to meet the challenges of our volatile world. 

    The reason for this is straightforward

    Putin’s aggression does not stop in Ukraine. 

    Russian spy ships menace our waters. 

    Russian planes enter our airspace. 

    Russian cyber-attacks hit our NHS 

    And just seven years ago – there was a Russian chemical weapons attack, in broad daylight

    On the streets of Salisbury. 

    We can’t hide from this. 

    I know people have felt the impact of this conflict through rising bills and prices. 

    But unless Ukraine is properly protected from Putin

    Then Europe will only become more unstable – and that will hurt us even more. 

    Furthermore, the great lesson of our history

    Is that tyrants like Putin only respond to strength. 

    So today I have announced the biggest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the Cold War. 

    We will keep our manifesto commitment to spend 2.5% of our GDP on defence.

    But in light of the grave threats we face

    We will bring that target forward so we meet it in 2027. 

    That is an increase of £13.4bn year on year compared to where we are today. 

    And we will go further. 

    I have long argued that in the face of ongoing and generational challenges

    European countries must do more for their own defence. 

    That is incontrovertible. 

    A completely reasonable point. 

    It’s a generational challenge – of course it is.  

    But one we must now take on. 

    So, subject to economic and fiscal conditions

    We will also set a clear ambition for Defence spending to rise to 3% of GDP in the next Parliament.  

    Clearly this is first and foremost a security imperative. 

    But I also believe that it’s a tremendous opportunity

    We can use this investment to rebuild Britain’s industrial base. 

    The first test of defence policy is always whether it keeps our country safe. 

    But the second should be whether it improves the condition of the British people

    Does it help provide the economic security that working people need? 

    Because ultimately that is fundamental to national security as well. 

    So mark my words

    We will make sure this investment maximises British jobs, British growth, British skills and British innovation. 

    And we should be optimistic about the change that it will deliver. 

    Nonetheless, in the short-term

    This investment can only be funded through hard choices. 

    And so today I have decided that we will fund the initial increase in defence spending

    By cutting our spending on overseas development

    Moving from 0.5% of GNI to 0.3%. 

    I want to be clear – that this is not an announcement I am happy to make. 

    I am proud of Britain’s pioneering record on overseas development

    And we will continue to play a key humanitarian role

    In war-torn countries like Sudan, Ukraine and Gaza

    In tackling climate change

    And supporting international efforts on global health challenges like vaccination.  

    And we will do everything to move towards a world where we can rebuild our development capacity. 

    However, the realities of our dangerous new era

    Mean that the defence and national security of our country must always come first. 

    That is what I campaigned on in the general election

    It is what we are delivering today. 

    A new approach to defence

    A revival of our industrial base

    A deepening of our alliances

    The instruments of our national power – brought together

    Creating opportunity.

    Assuring our allies.

    Delivering security for our country. 

    At moments like this in our past

    Britain has stood up to be counted. 

    It has come together. 

    And it has demonstrated strength.  

    That is what the security of this country needs now

    And it is what this Government will deliver. 

    I will now take questions.

    Updates to this page

    Published 25 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Local ‘RAPID’ Bin Initiative takes more than 120,000 pills off borough’s streets

    Source: Northern Ireland City of Armagh

    Pictured at the new Future Proof premises are: Aisling Gillespie (PCSP), Constable Aine Campbell (PSNI) , Sherene Livingston (Connections Team) and Shauney (Future Proof staff).

    A campaign to help dispose of unwanted or unused drugs, whether prescribed or illegal, has taken more than 120,000 pills off the streets of the Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon (ABC) borough since its launch in 2018.

    Led by ABC Policing and Community Safety Partnership (PCSP), ‘RAPID’ (Remove All Prescription and Illegal Drugs) is an initiative that promotes and facilitates the removal of all types of prescription and illegal drugs from the local community and provides disposal bins in various places across the council area.

    There are 12 bins in total – with one in Banbridge recently being relocated to the new Future Proof new premises at 15 Commercial Road, Banbridge.

    The RAPID Bins – which are bright yellow – are also located at the Tommy Makem Arts and Community Centre, Keady; Milestone Supermarket, Rathfriland; Tesco Craigavon; Tesco Lurgan; SPAR Aghagallon; Portadown Health Centre and Asda Superstore, Portadown, Corcrain Community Hub, Portadown, The Mall Shopping Centre, Armagh, Vivoxtra, Banbridge and Vivo Ennis Close, Lurgan.

    “Over the last seven years, these bins have played a pinnacle role in helping to combat the illegal use of drugs and prescription medication within our local communities,” commented Alderman Mark Baxter, Chair of the PCSP.

    “The RAPID initiative provides a safe way for anyone to dispose of drugs, whether they are prescribed or illegal, and to do so discreetly and anonymously. Drug misuse, involving both illegal and prescription drugs, is sadly a common issue and has the potential to cause suffering and tragedy to individuals, families, and communities.

    “It is fantastic to see community organisations installing the RAPID bins within their facilities to make it easier for the disposal of unwanted or unused drugs, tablets or medicines.”

    Some of the most common drugs disposed of in the RAPID bins are Diazepam, Citalopram, Gabapentin, Quetiapine, Mirtazapine, Pregabalin, Tramadol, Naproxen, Co-Codamol, Amitriptyline, Paroxetine, Kapake, Fluoxetine and Codeine.

    For more information on RAPID please visit www.drugsandalcoholni.info/rapid or contact Armagh, Banbridge and Craigavon Policing and Community Safety Partnership on 0300 0300 900.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Green parliamentarians write to Defence Secretary over defence spending principles

    Source: Green Party of England and Wales

    • Green MPs and peers call for defence spending decisions to be based on “core principles”
    • Ellie Chowns MP calls foreign aid cut announcement “cruel and unncecessary” 
    • Green letter highlights growing security threats relating to climate breakdown, food security and cyber security

    The six Green Party parliamentarians have written to the Defence Secretary John Healey setting out a series of “core principles” they say any decisions about defence spending should be based on [1]. 

    The letter comes as Keir Starmer announced that a rise in the defence budget will be funded by cuts to foreign aid. 

    In the letter, the MPs and peers call on Healey to ensure that all decisions on defence spending “tackle the biggest threats to long term human security, including climate chaos, food insecurity, and cyber-attacks on democracy”. 

    They also urge an increase in spending on diplomacy, peace-building and overseas aid in order to improve our security. 

    Responding to Starmer’s announcement today, Ellie Chowns MP said: 

    “It’s horrifying to see Keir Starmer follow Trump’s lead, gutting our international aid budget to increase defence spending. This is naive populism playing with life-and-death decisions. 

    “How many people will fall ill or die because they cannot access health services; how many more will go hungry? And how many children will be denied an education as a result of this decision? Cutting aid risks making the world more volatile and more dangerous, not safer. Real security means tackling hunger, poverty, and climate chaos. 

    “Taking money from the poorest in the name of defence is both cruel and unnecessary – we could and should instead be taxing the wealthiest who can afford to contribute more. 

    “The idea that the only way to strengthen our defences is by taking from those with the least is immoral. It’s a choice and it’s the wrong one.”

    Notes: 

    1. The full text of the letter reads: 

    Dear John,

    We are writing to set out the importance of any decisions about future defence spending being underpinned by core principles. In an ever more insecure world, made more unstable by the comments and actions of the US President, and with the ongoing need to stand up to Putin, it is vital that genuine long-term stability, safety and security is a priority. Alongside addressing the threats posed by the international political situation, the government must also address the significant and growing security threats relating to climate breakdown, food security and cyber security. 

     As such, we call on you to uphold the following principles:

    • Tackle the biggest threats to long term human security, including climate chaos, food insecurity, and cyber-attacks on democracy
    • Increase spending on diplomacy, peace-building and overseas aid, as key to security and defence policy
    • Don’t cut spending from other departmental budgets to increase defence spending
    • Strengthen our ties with Europe
    • Uphold international law, the rule of law and the right to self-determination
    • Recognise that a global prohibition on nuclear weapons will make everyone safer
    • Address the underlying causes of conflict and insecurity such as poverty, human rights abuses and resource scarcity
    • Restore UK sovereignty by decoupling from reliance on the US
    • Use economic levers such as sanctions on companies still operating in the UK and complicit in Russian fossil fuel exports

     We look forward to your response and to working constructively with the government towards enduring safety and security.

     Yours sincerely, all Green parliamentarians

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: On Third Anniversary Of Russia’s Full-Scale Invasion Of Ukraine, Durbin Reiterates Bipartisan Congressional Support For Ukraine

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin
    February 24, 2025
    Durbin: We should make sure Ukraine’s sovereignty and future are secure and not given away in appeasement to Putin—a move that could cost us dearly in the future
    WASHINGTON – On the third anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Co-Chair of the Senate Ukraine Caucus, spoke on the Senate floor in support of Ukraine. During his speech, Durbin condemned President Trump’s appeasement to Russian President Vladimir Putin—where Trump announced key concessions to Putin regarding Ukraine, while apparently ignoring Ukraine’s key demands.  Durbin began his speech by reflecting on President Reagan’s powerful speech at the Berlin Wall where he told the Soviets to “tear down this wall.”
    “Ronald Reagan understood all too well what the Soviet regime was all about—it was a regime that had seized eastern Europe and condemned millions of individuals to live under a cruel and repressive communist dictatorship. My mother’s family originally came from Lithuania—once an independent country then a republic of the Soviet Union. Now an independent, democratic country again. That country meant a lot and still does to my family. I certainly recall the stories of my grandparents leaving the Russian domination and coming to America. Until recently, Americans across the political spectrum—including Republican presidents and members of Congress—also saw such Russian tyranny for what it was—until now,” said Durbin.
    “Today, we see President Trump doing the bidding of Russian autocrat Vladimir Putin,” Durbin continued. “That’s right—the President of the United States of America is using talking points that sound like they were whispered in his ear by the Kremlin—all while denigrating and bullying our true allies in the region.”
    Durbin detailed how President Trump has spewed outrageous comments when talking about Ukraine. He claimed, Ukraine started the war with Russia. He then attacked the legitimacy of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy—who was democratically elected in a free and fair election. Trump called Zelenskyy a “dictator without elections.” Both comments are similar to lies said by Putin. 
    Durbin said, “But it gets worse, with Donald Trump having negotiated away in public key concessions to Russia to end the war including appeasement of Ukraine’s sovereign borders or possible future NATO membership. Trump, with one phone call, gave those away without even negotiating and certainly didn’t involve the Ukrainians who have lost 46,000 brave Ukrainians who have died because of Putin’s invasion. Today, in a stunning, shameful move, the United States voted with Russia, North Korea, Belarus, and a handful of dictatorships at the United Nations against a resolution condemning Russian aggression in Ukraine.”
    Former Lithuanian foreign minister Gabrielius Landsbergis said of this tragic and unbelievable state of affairs, that it sounded like there was a handout prepared by Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov from which the Trump Administration is now reading. He warned if President Trump continues to back Russia, then, “threats to European security will grow immensely. Putin will get braver, meaning more war in Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia and beyond.”
    “President Trump’s affinity for autocrats like Putin and selling out or bullying our allies will not make America stronger or our world safer. Nor will his petulant and bumbling weekend gutting of our top military officers—a troubling act that raises serious questions about the politicization of our proud, professional fighting force in America. Let me be clear: We cannot let President Trump rewrite history or upend proven alliances with decades of bipartisan support… And ultimately, only the Ukrainian people can decide Ukraine’s future. Doing the bidding of foreign dictators and playing politics with our military only undermines America’s [safety],” Durbin said.
    Today, Durbin joined U.S. Senators Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Thom Tillis (R-NC), Roger Wicker (R-MS), and others in leading a simple resolution that expresses continued solidarity with the people of Ukraine and condolences for the loss of thousands of lives to Russian aggression; rejects Russia’s attempts to militarily seize sovereign Ukrainian territory; reaffirms U.S. support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine; and states unequivocally that Ukraine must be at the table for negotiations over its future.
    Durbin also introduced the Protecting our Guests During Hostilities in Ukraine Act, legislation that would provide temporary guest status to Ukrainians and their immediate family members who are already in the United States through the “Uniting for Ukraine” parole process. The bill allows Ukrainians to stay and work in the U.S. until the Secretary of State determines that hostilities in Ukraine have ceased and it is safe for them to return.
    “When the war started, Republicans across the country opened their hearts and communities to desperately fleeing Ukrainians, even actively petitioning President Biden to protect them from deportation. So far, not a single Republican has cosponsored my bill [the Protecting our Guests During Hostilities in Ukraine Act]. But I urge them to join this simple act of American compassion. Standing up to dictators and speaking out for victims of war should never be a partisan issue,” Durbin said.
    Durbin concluded his speech by showing a photo of himself and the late Senator John McCain (R-AZ) on a bipartisan delegation CODEL to Ukraine in 2014. At the time, Russia had begun its attempts to seize Crimea and capture additional territory in the eastern part of the country.
    “We should show no less courage here, today on a bipartisan basis, in making sure Ukraine’s sovereignty and future are secure and not given away in appeasement to Putin—a move that could cost us all dearly in the future,” Durbin concluded.
    Video of Durbin’s remarks on the Senate floor is available here.
    Audio of Durbin’s remarks on the Senate floor is available here.
    Footage of Durbin’s remarks on the Senate floor is available here for TV Stations.
    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Eco Atlantic Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to Speak at Invest in African Energy (IAE) 2025 Amid Orange Basin Expansion

    Source: Africa Press Organisation – English (2) – Report:

    PARIS, France, February 25, 2025/APO Group/ —

    Gil Holzman, President & CEO, Eco Atlantic Oil & Gas, will speak at the Invest in African Energy (IAE) Forum 2025 in Paris this May as the company expands its presence in the Orange Basin, offshore South Africa.

    The Canada-headquartered Eco Atlantic has recently expanded its presence in Africa through strategic transactions and exploration initiatives. In June 2024, Eco Atlantic farmed into Block 1 in the Orange Basin, further strengthening its exploration portfolio in the region. The block has extensive 2D and 3D seismic data already completed, with no additional seismic acquisition or well drilling planned during the three-year carried period. During this time, Eco will focus on interpreting and analyzing the existing data to inform its planned Work Program, leveraging its in-house exploration team. The company also holds interests in Blocks 2B and 3B/4B in South Africa, along with four licenses in Namibia.

    IAE 2025 (http://apo-opa.co/3ETVwbj) is an exclusive forum designed to facilitate investment between African energy markets and global investors. Taking place May 13-14, 2025 in Paris, the event offers delegates two days of intensive engagement with industry experts, project developers, investors and policymakers. For more information, please visit www.Invest-Africa-Energy.com. To sponsor or participate as a delegate, please contact sales@energycapitalpower.com.

    Eco Atlantic’s approach centers on exploring low-carbon intensity oil and gas in stable emerging markets close to infrastructure, aiming to deliver material value for its stakeholders while contributing to the energy transition. The company prioritizes efficient exploration strategies that minimize environmental impact while maximizing resource potential.

    By focusing on proven basins with existing infrastructure, Eco Atlantic seeks to accelerate development timelines and enhance economic viability in its operating regions. The upcoming forum will highlight how oil and gas independents like Eco Atlantic are navigating Africa’s evolving energy landscape, driving investment and sustainable resource development.

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: The Mayor’s budget should fund a Leasehold Advice Centre

    Source: Mayor of London

    London has the highest proportion of leaseholders in England, with 1.3 million leasehold properties in 2022/23, comprising 36% of all London homes and 64% of all London flats.

    London leaseholders also typically pay higher service charges, with the median annual service charge £1,450 across London in 2022/23, and 20% of London leaseholders paying over £4,000 per year in 2023.

    The London Assembly has today called on the Mayor to commit £150,000 in his Final Consolidated Budget for 2025-26 to fund a Leasehold Advice Centre, giving London’s leaseholders advice, assistance and referrals to other services.

    Andrew Boff AM, who proposed the motion, said:

    “The Assembly has spoken unanimously to support a leasehold advisory service, to support people trapped in leasehold hell. I am pleased with the support for my motion and hope that the Mayor will listen and implement this vital service.”

    The full text of the motion is:

    This Assembly recalls the landmark motion passed unanimously at its plenary meeting on 13th February, where it raised concerns about leasehold, called for its replacement with commonhold, and for the Mayor to lobby the government and use his funding and land to promote pilot projects.

    This Assembly again notes that London had the highest proportion of leaseholders in England, with 1.3 million leasehold properties in 2022/23, comprising 36% of all London homes and 64% of all London flats. London leaseholders also typically pay higher service charges, with the median annual service charge £1,450 across London in 2022/23, and 20% of London leaseholders paying over £4,000 per year in 2023.

    This Assembly also notes that, whilst we wait for Parliament to deliver a viable alternative to leasehold, there is an urgent need to step up the support provided to existing leaseholders.

    This Assembly therefore calls on the Mayor, in his Final Consolidated Budget for 2025-26, to commit £150,000 to fund a Leasehold Advice Centre. This would provide leaseholders with someone they can call for London-specific advice, assistance and referrals to other services. It could also gather valuable data and intelligence to help support GLA policymaking in this area, especially to help fulfil the Mayor’s manifesto commitments to support leaseholders and pilot alternative tenures.

    The proposed GLA-supported Leasehold Advice Centre would complement the Mayor’s existing portal that provides written guidance to leaseholders, and national services such as LEASE and Citizens Advice, providing a personalised advice and support service tailored specifically to London.

    The meeting can be viewed via webcast or YouTube.

    Follow us @LondonAssembly

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Powers for landlords to collect rent from benefit payments to be re-examined

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 2

    Press release

    Powers for landlords to collect rent from benefit payments to be re-examined

    A controversial system that automatically approves landlord requests to deduct tenants’ benefits to pay rent arrears and ongoing rent payments is being re-examined, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall announced today [Tuesday 25 February].

    • Work and Pensions Secretary pledges to “right the wrongs” of controversial benefit deduction system.
    • Follows decision by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) not to appeal court judgement which found one claimant’s landlord payments were unfair.
    • Action is part of wider plans to make the benefits system fairer and protect people from falling into debt.

    It comes amid concerns that the system – aimed at helping people avoid issues with their landlords such as eviction – may actually be pushing the poorest into debt.

    Currently, a computer program automatically approves landlord requests to deduct up to a fifth of someone’s monthly Universal Credit payments for outstanding rent repayments without them being consulted by either their landlord or DWP.

    The department will now look at this process and consider better ways of ensuring landlords get the rent they are owed in a fair and proportionate way while benefit claimants are protected from falling into debt.

    It comes as part of wider efforts by the Work and Pensions Secretary to fix the broken welfare system to make it fairer and ensure it improves living standards which will unlock economic growth – a key commitment in the government’s Plan for Change.

    Work and Pensions Secretary, Rt Hon Liz Kendall MP, said:

    I am determined to right the wrongs that have persisted in the benefits system for too long. The automatic approval of landlords’ requests for tenants’ benefits to be deducted is one of these.

    As well as urgently reviewing this system, I am bringing forward major changes to the health and disability benefits system so that it works for everyone, underpinned by the biggest employment reforms in a generation.

    We will continue to listen to people’s concerns, and transform our benefits system to one of fairness, not punishment.

    This decision comes in response to a high-profile legal challenge in January, which was won by Nathan Roberts whose benefits were deducted and automatically paid to his landlord to cover alleged rent arrears and ongoing rent payments – despite a dispute about repairs to the property.  The Work and Pensions Secretary has confirmed DWP will not appeal this decision.

    Minister for Social Security and Disability, Rt Hon Sir Stephen Timms MP, said:

    The benefits system needs urgent reform and we are taking action across the board to do this – whether that’s tackling the huge accumulation of debt by Carer’s Allowance recipients through no fault of their own, or this automatic deduction of benefits purely at the request of a landlord.

    Combined with our efforts to Get Britain Working and our upcoming health and disability benefits reform, all of this will lead to better support for those who need it, and open doors for those who can work.

    This comes ahead of a manifesto commitment to deliver a wider review of Universal Credit to ensure it is getting people into work, making work pay and tackling poverty.

    In April, the Universal Credit Fair Repayment Rate will also come into force, reducing the cap on how much can be deducted from someone’s benefits from 25% to 15%. This means approximately 1.2 million households will keep more of their Universal Credit payment each month, with households expected to be better off by £420 a year on average.   

    Updates to this page

    Published 25 February 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Global: Alcohol ingestion by animals is surprisingly widespread – and we’re starting to understand its impact

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Anna Christina Bowland, PhD Candidate in Biosciences, University of Exeter

    Humans may not be the only animals that ingest alcohol, research is suggesting. Studies on animals are showing they may be eating natural ethanol for its medicinal or nutritional properties.

    Humans drink alcohol in almost every part of the world, apart from places where people abstain for religious reasons. In the past, many people believed alcohol consumption was unique to humans, but growing evidence is showing we aren’t alone in our taste for booze.

    It has long been known that vinegar flies are closely linked to alcohol given their tendency to breed on fermented fruits. However, it turns out they are not an outlier.

    When you think of alcohol, you may think of a pint of beer or a glass of wine. But there are many types of alcohol, most of which are extremely toxic. For example, isopropanol (rubbing alcohol), which is commonly used as a disinfectant.

    Ethanol, or ethyl alcohol, is the alcohol found in alcoholic beverages, but ethanol is also prevalent in nature. Yeasts, including Saccharomyces cerevisiae, also known as brewer’s yeast, are widespread in the natural environment and produce ethanol (possibly to defend the plant’s sugary resource from competing microorganisms), when they metabolise sugars via fermentation. Many fruits, nectars and saps contain an abundance of sugars. Some of this sugar becomes ethanol when colonised by yeast.

    Fruit from plants in Panama, Costa Rica, Singapore, Israel and Finland have been found to contain ethanol, as well as some nectars and saps. The concentration of ethanol in naturally fermenting fruit is typically much lower than those in human-made alcoholic beverages, but some overripe fruit, such as fruits of the black palm (Astrocaryum standleyanum) have ethanol levels similar to a standard beer (5%).

    If fruit, nectars and saps ferment in the wild, it is not surprising that some animals may ingest ethanol. Studies, experimental and in the wild, have confirmed insects (including honeybees and butterflies) ingest it, as well as birds (such as hummingbirds, cedar waxwings and bohemian waxwings) and mammals (for example, pen-tailed tree shrews and the slow loris). Non-human primates, including one of our closest living relatives the chimpanzee, ingest it too.

    Although examples in the wild are rare, this may be due to lack of research rather than prevalence. Researchers are developing methods that make it easier to measure ethanol in the field, and as more research is conducted, more examples will probably be discovered.

    Do animals get drunk?

    There are many anecdotes of “drunk” animals, from moose to elephants, but none of these cases have actually been validated. From an evolutionary standpoint, being drunk is disadvantageous. Intoxicated animals could be more susceptible to injury or predation, and less likely to survive.

    Instead, many scientists expect natural selection would favour adaptations for increased ethanol metabolism to avoid becoming “drunk”. This allows animals to eat fermented foods while minimising the negative effects of intoxication.

    In animals, including humans, the primary metabolic route for ethanol is similar. Ethanol is first oxidised to acetaldehyde (a toxic intermediate) by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase.

    Acetaldehyde is then converted to acetate (which is less toxic) by aldehyde dehydrogenase. Yet, the efficiency at which different animals metabolise ethanol varies. It can vary between humans too.

    Some animals appear to have enhanced ethanol metabolism. Much like humans, chimpanzees, gorillas and bonobos share a mutation that make them particularly efficient at metabolising ethanol.

    Interestingly, the only Asian great ape (orangutan), which is highly arboreal (tree-dwelling), doesn’t share this mutation. This may be because orangutans did not experience the same evolutionary pressures as the more terrestrial (ground-dwelling) African great apes.

    For example, orangutans primarily feed in trees where fruit is expected to be less fermented than when it falls to the ground.

    Adult female chimpanzee feeding on ripe Spondias mombin
    Kimberley Hockings, CC BY-NC-ND

    It is possible that if sugary foods ferment naturally, then animals that eat these foods may consume ethanol without meaning to. Ethanol may have some benefits. It has antimicrobial properties and vinegar flies are known to use it to self-medicate against parasites. However, not much is known on whether other animals also use ethanol for medicinal purposes.

    There are confirmed sightings of many animals, from chimpanzees to orangutans using plants for medication, so the use of ethanol in this way could be widespread. Animals may also ingest food with ethanol in it because ethanol itself is a source of calories and its presence indicates sugar and nutrient content.

    Ambrosia beetles use the smell of ethanol as a cue to find suitable host trees to colonise. The ethanol increases the growth of fungi which the beetles feed on.

    Many of us are keenly aware of ethanol’s cognitive impact, including feelings of relaxation. Ethanol might play a significant role in promoting sociality among humans. This may also apply to other species, but has yet to be studied in a natural context.

    We still have much to learn about wild animals’ natural use of ethanol. Many
    hypotheses remain untested, and we know little about whether animals seek out ethanol and fermented foods. But many animals ingest it. It is clear the party is growing, and we are just one of many species that partake in ethanol.

    Anna Christina Bowland has received funding from the Primatological Society of Great Britain (PSGB) and the University of Exeter.

    ref. Alcohol ingestion by animals is surprisingly widespread – and we’re starting to understand its impact – https://theconversation.com/alcohol-ingestion-by-animals-is-surprisingly-widespread-and-were-starting-to-understand-its-impact-246638

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI USA: McConnell Proud to Confirm Driscoll as Army Secretary

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kentucky Mitch McConnell
    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) issued the following statement today regarding the confirmation of Dan Driscoll as United States Secretary of the Army:
    “Dan Driscoll steps into the role of Army Secretary at a pivotal moment. Today, we face an axis of aggressors in Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea, and we owe it to our servicemembers and the American people to plan accordingly. The Secretary must take on the essential task of building up and maintaining the backbone of American hard power, work on which I intend to partner closely from the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee. He must support our men and women in uniform and strengthen our Amy installations, such as the three premier installations in Kentucky. And importantly, Secretary Driscoll must bring a sea change to the way we plan for the future – preserving our peace not through one-time injections and half-measures, but by getting serious about strengthening our hand and sustaining America’s military edge long term.”

    MIL OSI USA News