NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM meeting with Prime Minister Fiala of the Czech Republic: 14 July 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    PM meeting with Prime Minister Fiala of the Czech Republic: 14 July 2025

    The Prime Minister welcomed the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, Petr Fiala, to Downing Street this afternoon.

    The Prime Minister welcomed the Prime Minister of the Czech Republic, Petr Fiala, to Downing Street this afternoon.

    The leaders began by reflecting on the close relationship between the two countries, including across defence, trade and energy security.

    Both agreed that there were plenty of opportunities to be even more ambitious, which was emphasised by the signing of a civil nuclear memorandum of understanding today.

    The agreement would allow both countries to harness the potential of nuclear power and the related technology to drive prosperity, energy security and highly skilled jobs, the leaders agreed.

    The Prime Minister also thanked Prime Minister Fiala for the Czech Republic’s strong support for Ukraine in the face of ongoing Russian aggression, and the leaders reflected on the strength of solidarity for Ukraine through the Coalition of the Willing.

    Both looked forward to speaking again soon.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: China, EU hold 6th High-Level Dialogue on Environment and Climate

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, July 14 (Xinhua) — Chinese Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang and European Commission Vice President Teresa Ribera held the 6th China-EU High-Level Dialogue on Environment and Climate in Beijing on Monday.

    Ding Xuexiang, also a member of the Standing Committee of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee, called on the two sides, under the strategic guidance of their leaders, to strengthen practical cooperation on environment and climate and make greater contributions to the sustainable development of China, the EU and the world.

    The Vice Premier of the State Council noted that China pays special attention to environmental protection and climate change control, has developed and implemented a series of practical measures, and has achieved notable results in the all-round green transformation of socio-economic development.

    China will firmly promote green and low-carbon development and take effective measures to participate in global environmental and climate governance, Ding Xuexiang promised, adding that China hopes to work with the EU to maintain high-level dialogue and exchanges, build greater consensus and deepen the green partnership.

    According to him, China is ready to adhere to the principles of mutual benefit and win-win with the European Union, continuously expand the depth and scope of cooperation in key areas such as energy and the circular economy, and jointly support the green and low-carbon development of other developing countries.

    China also hopes to work with the EU to promote the construction of a fair, reasonable, cooperative and mutually beneficial global environmental and climate governance system, Ding Xuexiang added.

    T. Ribera, for her part, said that the European Union hopes to take advantage of the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic relations between the EU and China to further strengthen existing cooperation with China, make efforts to find new opportunities for cooperation, adhere to multilateralism and promote the effective implementation of the Paris Agreement on climate change. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Massive cannabis shipment intercepted by the CBSA in Saint John

    Source: Government of Canada News (2)

    July 14, 2025                        Saint John, NB                                Canada Border Services Agency

    Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) officers in Saint John, New Brunswick (NB) recently intercepted a shipment of suspected cannabis that is the largest cannabis seizure on record since 2015.  

    On May 21, 2025, border services officers at the Port of Saint John, with assistance from CBSA intelligence officers in the Greater Toronto Area and Atlantic Regions, examined a marine container destined for export to Scotland, United Kingdom.

    During this examination, officers uncovered over 6,700 kilograms of suspected cannabis, valued at $49.6 M. The drugs were falsely declared on the documentation provided to the CBSA and were concealed in nearly 400 boxes inside the container.

    The quantity seized in this single shipment is three times more than the total amount of cannabis seized by the CBSA across Canada in the previous year.

    The cannabis and all evidence were transferred to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) Eastern Region Federal Policing (New Brunswick) for further investigation.

    The CBSA and the RCMP are securing our borders by collaborating on investigations to prevent illegal drug smuggling and organized crime from threatening the safety and well-being of our communities.

    Although cannabis is legal in Canada, cannabis smuggling supports organized crime and helps fund other illegal activities, such as narcotics and weapons smuggling. It is often used as an exchange for other illegal drugs being imported into Canada such as cocaine. The trade of contraband cannabis is a major threat to the safety and health of Canadians. It is a serious criminal offence, punishable with imprisonment of up to 5 years under the Customs Act and up to 14 years under the Cannabis Act.

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Environmental Crimes Bulletin – June 2025

    Source: United States Attorneys General 7

    View All Environmental Crimes Bulletins


    In This Issue:


    Cases by District/Circuit


    District/Circuit Case Name Conduct/Statute(s)
    7th Circuit Court of Appeals  United States v.  Clark Conspiracy; False Statement; Mail Fraud; Obstruction
    District of Alaska United States v. Matanuska Diesel, LLC, et al. Emissions Tampering; Clean Air Act; Conspiracy
    Central District of California United States v. Isidoro Chaparro Sanchez, et al. Cockfighting; Animal Welfare Act
    Southern District of California United States v. Juandaniel Medina Exotic Bird Smuggling
    United States v. Dumitru Cicai Pesticide Smuggling
    United States v. Jose Manuel Valenzuela Refrigerant Smuggling; Failure to Present Tanks for Inspection
    Middle District of Georgia United States v. Brandon Baker, et al. Dogfighting; Animal Welfare Act; Conspiracy
    District of Idaho United States v. Jerrod R. Farr, et al. Big Game Outfitter; Lacey Act
    Eastern District of Missouri United States v. All Out Diesel, et al. Emissions Tampering; Clean Air Act; Conspiracy
    District of Montana United States v. Hollis G. Hale, et al. Sheep Hunting; Endangered Species Act; Lacey Act
    District of New Jersey United States v. Angela Amponsa Unregistered Pesticide Sales; Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
    Southern District of Ohio United States v. Katrina D. Favret, et al. Animal Crush Videos; PACT Act; Conspiracy
    United States v. Fabcon Precast LLC Employee Death; Occupational Safety and Health Act
    Eastern District of Pennsylvania United States v. Matthew Caroluzzi, et al. Emissions Tampering; Clean Air Act; Conspiracy
    Western District of Pennsylvania United States v. Erie Coke Corporation, et al. Air Emissions; Clean Air Act; Conspiracy
    District of South Carolina United States v. Shaylynn Kolwyck-Peterson Chimpanzee Sale; Lacey Act
    United States v. Bhagavan “Doc” Antle, et al. Wildlife Trafficking; Conspiracy; Money Laundering
    Southern District of Texas United States v. Jose Daniel Santiago-Mendoza, et al. Illegal Fishing; Lacey Act
    Western District of Texas United States v. Paul Jacob Elliott Sommers Reptile Smuggling
    District of Wyoming United States v. Mark Orchard, et al. Oily Waste Discharges; Depredation of Government Property

    DECISIONS 


    United States v.  Clark

    • Nos. 24-1320, 24-1321
    • 2025 WL 1635508 (7th Cir., June 10, 2025)

    On June 10, 2025, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion affirming Derrick Clark’s conviction on all counts, affirming Shawn Mesner’s fraud conviction, and vacating Mesner’s conspiracy conviction.

    Both defendants worked at Didion Milling (“Didion”). In May 2017, a corn mill operated by Didion exploded due to combustible dust, killing five workers and seriously injuring 14 others. Clark was convicted at trial of conspiracy, falsifying an environmental compliance certification, falsifying environmental compliance records, and obstructing an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) investigation by providing false and misleading testimony. Mesner was convicted at trial of fraud and conspiracy, each relating to his role in falsifying records regarding the mill’s sanitation program.

    The Seventh Circuit first held that the district court did not err in admitting another Didion employee’s inconsistent prior sworn statement. The court found that the statement was made under oath and that the trial judge did not need to review it line-by-line to assess its inconsistency with the witness’s in-court testimony. The court also rejected Clark’s sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenges to his convictions for making false entries in Didion’s Clean Air Act compliance certification (18 U.S.C. § 1519) and aiding and abetting the use of falsified baghouse logs, which were within the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s jurisdiction (18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(3)).

    Next, the court affirmed Clark’s conspiracy conviction (18 U.S.C § 371), holding that the jury instructions adequately informed the jury that the object of the conspiracy must be a federal offense and that the jury must be unanimous. The court emphasized that the special verdict form further alleviated any confusion. The court also held that Clark’s conviction for making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1505) did not depend on the constitutionality of the underlying OSHA regulation, and thus it declined to weigh in on the regulation’s validity. Finally, in a footnote, the court dismissed Clark’s assertion of erroneous evidentiary rulings and cumulative error.

    As for Mesner, the court first vacated Mesner’s conspiracy conviction because the government dismissed the substantive count underlying that conviction at the close of evidence and the district court never instructed the jury on it. The Seventh Circuit thus “decline[d] to uphold a conviction premised on a count that the government dismissed, and on which the court never instructed the jury.” But the court affirmed Mesner’s conviction for fraud conspiracy (18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, 1349), relying in part on the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Kousisis v. United States. The court held that the indictment “easily” satisfied the standard for sufficiency, properly identified money as the “object” of the conspiracy, and sufficiently alleged that Mesner and Didion misrepresented an essential element of the bargain to Didion’s customers.

    The court also concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to convict on this count, rejecting Mesner’s argument that Ciminelli v. United States foreclosed his conviction or that the government needed to introduce the contracts between Didion and its customers to prove materiality. The court concluded that a jury could reasonably find – based on witness testimony and documentary evidence – that the accuracy of Didion’s sanitation logbook was material to the bargain between Didion and its customers. 


    Recently Charged


    United States v. Matthew Caroluzzi, et al.

    • No. 2:25-CR-00239 (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • ECS Senior Trial Attorney RJ Powers
    • Former ECS Attorney Ron Sarachan
    • AUSA Sarah Solow

    On June 3, 2025, prosecutors charged Matthew Caroluzzi and his business, Matt’s Heavy Duty Mobile Diagnostics and Truck Repair & Heavy Towing (“Matt’s HD”) with conspiracy to violate the Clean Air Act (CAA) (18 U.S.C. § 371), and nine substantive CAA counts (18 U.S.C. § 371; 42 U.S.C. § 7413(c)(2)(C)).

    Caroluzzi owns and operates Matt’s HD, located in Sellersville, Pennsylvania. The company conducts repairs on large semi-trucks and provides a 24/7 towing service. His customers also travelled from out-of-state locations, including New Jersey, Delaware, and Maryland

    The defendants tampered with and rendered inaccurate monitoring devices and methods required to be maintained under the CAA, that is, on-board and diagnostic emission monitoring devices on diesel trucks. Caroluzzi removed physical emissions control components and altered vehicles’ on-board computers. With assistance from his mechanics, Caroluzzi conducted emissions “deletes” at the shop, on the road, and at other diesel repair shops. Over the course of the conspiracy, Caroluzzi charged customers between $1,000 and $3,000 for his services, and performed deletes on more than 700 diesel-powered trucks.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Criminal Investigation Division conducted the investigation.

    Related Press Release: Heavy Duty Truck Repair and Diagnostics Company and Its Owner Charged in Major Clean Air Act Investigation | DOT OIG


    United States v. Juandaniel Medina

    • No. 25-mj-03169 (Southern District of California)
    • AUSA Evangeline Dech

    On June 10, 2025, prosecutors charged Juandaniel Medina with smuggling endangered exotic birds (16 U.S.C. §§ 1538(c), 1540(b); 18 U.S.C. § 545). Medina is the third person in recent weeks authorities have detained for attempting to smuggle protected birds, including red-lored Amazon parrots. All seven birds in this case are alive and under quarantine.

    On May 26, 2025, authorities detained Medina at the San Ysidro Port of Entry after discovering seven live Amazon parrots in a cardboard box on the passenger floorboard. Medina was the driver and registered owner of the vehicle. He admitted paying $700 cash for the parrots with the intention of breeding and/or reselling them in the United States. All Amazon parrot species are listed under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species.

    Smuggled birds that are not subject to quarantine can prove dangerous as they may carry and spread Avian influenza (bird flu) and other diseases. Bird flu is highly contagious and can cause flu-like symptoms, respiratory illness, pneumonia, and death in humans and other birds, including those housed on poultry farms.

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement and Homeland Security Investigations conducted the investigation. 

    Photo of parrot found in box in defendant’s vehicle following his arrest, from press release.

    Related Press Release: Southern District of California | Exotic Bird Smuggler Busted at the Border | United States Department of Justice


    United States v. Katrina D. Favret, et al.

    • No. 2:25-CR-00071 (Southern District of Ohio)
    • ECS Senior Trial Attorney Adam Cullman
    • ECS Trial Attorney Mark Romley
    • AUSA Nicole Pakiz
    • ECS Paralegal Gabriella Leaming

    On June 11, 2025, a court unsealed an indictment charging two individuals for their involvement with online groups dedicated to creating and distributing videos depicting acts of extreme violence and sexual abuse against monkeys.

    The indictment states that Katrina D. Favret and Robert M. Craig conspired with previously charged defendant Ronald P. Bedra to create and distribute so-called “animal crush videos” (18 U.S.C. § 371). Favret is also charged with creating and with distributing animal crush videos (18 U.S.C. §§ 48(a)(2), 48(a)(3)).

    According to court documents, the defendants conspired with others to create and distribute videos depicting acts of sadistic violence against juvenile and adult monkeys. The conspirators used encrypted chat applications to direct money to individuals in Indonesia willing to commit the requested acts of torture on camera.

    Eleven other individuals were charged with similar violations in an indictment unsealed in May (United States v. Ernest Chavez, et al.).

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement conducted the investigation.

    Related Press Release: Office of Public Affairs | Grand Jury Indicts 11 More Individuals for Involvement with Online Groups Dedicated to Monkey Torture and Mutilation | United States Department of Justice


    Guilty Pleas


    United States v. Mark Orchard, et al.

    • No. 2:23-CR-00166 (District of Wyoming)
    • AUSA Kerry Jacobson
    • SAUSA Richard Baird

    On June 9, 2025, Mark Orchard pleaded guilty to Depredation of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 1361). Co-defendant Darwin Crawford entered a similar plea on May 30, 2025. Crawford and Orchard are scheduled for sentencing on August 18 and 22, 2025, respectively.

    Contractors Crawford and Orchard worked as field operation managers who oversaw  field operations for an energy company. A Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Wyoming State Chief Ranger received information that contractors were dumping waste on well pads leased from the BLM. The waste had been generated from oil-water separators and maintenance operations performed on produced water storage tanks. Well pads are areas approved by the BLM for the drilling of gas or oil wells pursuant to approved plans and conditions.

    The defendants instructed other crew members to “dig a hole and dump stuff from the junk tank” into the pit, and to backfill the hole. The affected area is known as the East Echo Springs Saltwater disposal facility (Echo Springs), located in Carbon County, Wyoming. Echo Springs was only permitted for the disposal of produced water, a byproduct of oil and gas extraction, through injection deep into the ground. The site was not permitted for burying solid oil waste. Approximately 10 barrels of this oil waste material was buried at the direction of the defendants.

    Soil samples taken by investigators of this buried material showed levels of total petroleum hydrocarbons at 15,200 ppm, 16,100 ppm, and 11,000 ppm. In comparison, an uncontaminated soil sample at the site measured a total petroleum hydrocarbon level of 18 ppm.

    Orchard and Crawford admitted they signed off on daily work tickets and invoices for this and other work they directed.

    The Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Criminal Investigation Division conducted the investigation.


    United States v. Jose Daniel Santiago-Mendoza, et al.

    • No. 1:25-CR-00305 (Southern District of Texas)
    • AUSA William Hagen

    On June 9, 2025, Jose Daniel Santiago-Mendoza pleaded guilty to violating the Lacey Act for unlawfully transporting fish taken from the Gulf of America. Co-defendants Jesus David Luna-Martinez and Jesus Roberto Morales-Amador previously pleaded guilty to the same charge (16 U.S.C. § 3372(a)(1)). Miguel Angel Ramirez-Vidal is scheduled for trial to begin on July 14, 2025.

    On April 17, 2025, the defendants attempted to transport and export roughly 315 kilograms of red snapper illegally taken from U.S. waters to sell in Mexico. Authorities observed the crew’s panga-style fishing vessel in the Gulf of America, seven miles north of the U.S.-Mexico maritime boundary line and 21 miles east of South Padre Island. The defendants’ fishing vessel was unmarked and unregistered. It was not flying the flag of any nation and operating without running lights. The defendants were using more than four thousand yards of heavy nylon fishing line and 1,200 fishing hooks. None of the crew members possessed a permit to fish in U.S. waters nor did any hold a quota for red snapper.

    Homeland Security Investigations, the U.S. Coast Guard, Customs and Border Protection Air and Marine Operations, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Texas Parks and Wildlife, and the South Padre Island Police Department conducted the joint investigation.

    Illegally taken Red Snapper and Gear.

    Related Press Release: Southern District of Texas | Mexican commercial fishermen plead guilty to illegal red snapper harvesting | United States Department of Justice


    United States v. Angela Amponsa

    • No. 2:25-mj-01106 (District of New Jersey)
    • ECS Senior Trial Attorney RJ Powers
    • RCEC Jason Garelick

    On June 10, 2025, Angela Amponsa pleaded guilty to violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act  (7 U.S.C. §§ 136j(a)(l)(A),136l(b)(l)(B)).  Sentencing is scheduled for October 14, 2025.

    Amponsa owned the New Jersey African Caribbean Market in Hamilton, New Jersey. On two separate occasions, she knowingly sold the pesticides Sniper DDVP and Spri Gone to an undercover Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) agent. These products are not EPA-registered.

    Authorities executed a federal search warrant at the market and seized approximately 1,100 bottles of unregistered pesticides.  When questioned by authorities, Amponsa admitted that she sold unregistered pesticides knowing they were illegal in the U.S. 

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Criminal Investigation Division conducted the investigation. 


    United States v. Shaylynn Kolwyck-Peterson

    • No. 4:25-CR-00699 (District of South Carolina)
    • ECS Senior Trial Attorney Patrick Duggan

    On June 10, 2025, Shaylynn Kolwyck-Peterson pleaded guilty to a one-count information charging her with a felony Lacey Act false labeling violation (16 U.S.C. §§ 3372 (d)(2), 3373(d)(3)(A)). The charge stems from her sale of a chimpanzee to Doc Antle in South Carolina. Sentencing has not been scheduled.

    Sunshine Zoological Preserve, LLC, is a private for-profit roadside zoo in North Florida owned and managed by the Kolwyck family. Sunshine Zoological is believed to be the only facility in the U.S. breeding chimpanzees for private/non-scientific purposes.

    Shaylynn Kolwyck drove a newborn chimpanzee to Doc Antle in South Carolina, where Antle paid her $200,000. She then called Antle to offer another juvenile chimpanzee, and Antle paid her an additional $200,000 in cash for it.

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service obtained paperwork for both sales, which falsely listed the sales as non-commercial intrastate “transfers” from Sunshine Zoological in Florida to Antle’s South Carolina facility.

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement conducted the investigation.


    United States v. Paul Jacob Elliott Sommers

    • No. 3:24-CR-01659 (Western District of Texas)
    • ECS Senior Trial Attorney Gary Donner
    • ECS Trial Attorney Leigh Rendé
    • ECS Law Clerk Amanda Backer

    On June 10, 2025, Paul Jacob Elliott Sommers pleaded guilty to smuggling wildlife into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 545).

    As part of an investigation into illegal wildlife trafficking from Mexico into the U.S., authorities uncovered Mexico-based reptile suppliers who trafficked wildlife to U.S. based-customers. Over a period of four years, Sommers purchased wildlife from Mexico and coordinated with others to capture and transport the animals across the El Paso border. Sommers then sold the animals to customers in the U.S.

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement conducted the investigation.


    United States v. Dumitru Cicai

    • No. 3:25-CR-02276 (Southern District of California)
    • AUSA Emily Allen

    On June 10, 2025, Dumitru Cicai pleaded guilty to smuggling (18 U.S.C. § 545). Sentencing is scheduled for August 28, 2025.

    On March 31, 2025, Cicai was caught smuggling 24 one-liter bottles of Taktic pesticide into the United States. As he drove into the United States at the San Ysidro Port of Entry, Cicai told the Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) primary inspection officer that he had nothing to declare. Upon inspecting the vehicle, the primary officer discovered multiple pieces of natural wood branches in the vehicle’s trunk and large bottles concealed in black bags.

    When questioned by the secondary CBP officer, Cicai said he only had wood to declare, nothing else. Upon closer inspection, officers found 24 bottles of pesticide labeled “Taktic.”

    Taktic contains the active ingredient amitraz at an emulsifiable concentration of 12.5 percent. Under U.S. Environmental Protection Agency regulations, amitraz in this form is a cancelled and unregistered pesticide in the United States.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Criminal Investigation Division and Homeland Security Investigations conducted the investigation. 


    United States v. Isidoro Chaparro Sanchez, et al.

    • No. 5:24-CR-00209 (Central District of California)
    • AUSA Corey Burleson
    • AUSA Dennis Mitchell

    On June 16, 2025, Cirilo Esquivel Alcantar pleaded guilty to operating cockfighting events in San Bernardino County and sponsoring and exhibiting roosters in an animal fighting venture (7 U.S.C. § 2156(a)(1)). Alcantar, the fifth and final defendant to plead guilty in this case, is scheduled for sentencing on October 6, 2025.

    Between May 2023 and July 2024, Alcantar, along with Luis Octavio Angulo, Sergio Jimenez Maldonado, Eva Anilu Pastor Uriostegui, and Isidoro Chaparro Sanchez organized and facilitated cockfighting events in Muscoy, California. The defendants held events on Sundays during the cockfighting “season.” Individuals brought roosters to fight, often drawing more than 100 spectators to each event.

    Attendees paid $20 to park at a different location nearly one mile away from the event location. They were then shuttled to the cockfighting location, where they paid another fee – usually $40 – to enter the arena where the fights took place. Attendees could also place bets on the cockfights and participate in a raffle.

    Cockfighters paid a fee to enter their roosters into fights ($1,000 for four roosters) with several fights scheduled for the day. Before the fights, a sharp blade, known as a “gaff,” was often attached to each rooster’s leg. At times, the fights ended in the death of one or both roosters.

    Sanchez, Angulo, Uriostegui, and Maldanado pleaded guilty to conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371). They are respectively scheduled for sentencing on August 18th, August 25th, September 9th, and October 6, 2025.

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation conducted the investigation. 


    United States v. Erie Coke Corporation, et al.

    • No. 1:22-CR-00023 (Western District of Pennsylvania)
    • AUSA Nicole Vasquez Schmitt
    • AUSA Michael L. Ivory

    On June 17, 2025, Erie Coke Corporation (ECC) pleaded guilty to conspiracy and to a Clean Air Act Title V (CAA) violation for knowingly emitting unburned or raw coke oven gas, a hazardous air pollutant, in violation of its permit (18 U.S.C. § 371; 42 U.S.C. § 7413(c)(1)). Sentencing is scheduled for October 7, 2025.

    ECC owned a coke manufacturing plant in Erie, Pennsylvania. The facility was located along Lake Erie, adjacent to the inlet to Presque Isle Bay. A number of private residences, public facilities, and several schools were nearby.

    Turning coal into coke generates a variety of pollutants, including volatile gases such as benzene, toluene, and xylene, as well as particulate matter. The facility operated under a CAA Title V permit issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This permit prohibited the company from emitting coke oven gas into the outdoor air without burning the gas first. The company also used a Continuous Opacity Monitor (COM) to measure its opacity levels, another way to monitor particulate matter emissions. Authorities required ECC to install the COM as part of a state enforcement action. The company previously violated its Title V permit and state air pollution laws, including exceeding opacity levels from the coke oven battery stack. As a result, ECC implemented additional remedial measures to reduce emissions to resolve an EPA civil enforcement action.

    However, ECC and employees continued to violate the CAA by, among other things, removing caps on heating flues atop the coke oven batteries to allow combustion gases to vent directly into the air and bypassing the plant’s environmental monitoring system. ECC then submitted emissions monitoring data to regulators each quarter that underrepresented the number of emissions.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Criminal Investigation Division conducted the investigation.

    Related Press Release: Western District of Pennsylvania | Erie Coke Corporation Pleads Guilty to Air Emissions Violations | United States Department of Justice


    United States v. Jerrod R. Farr, et al.

    • No. 4:24-CR-00061 (District of Idaho)
    • AUSA Justin Paskett

    On June 23, 2025, Jerrod Farr pleaded guilty to violating the Lacey Act (16 U.S.C. §§ 3372(a)(1), 3373(d)(2)). Sentencing is scheduled for September 15, 2025. Co-defendant Michael T. Scott remains charged in a six- count indictment with violating the Lacey Act, providing false or fictitious information to a Forest Service officer, and conducting work activity without a special-use authorization (16 U.S.C. §§ 551, 3372(a)(1), 3373(d)(2)).

    Farr owned and operated White Cloud Outfitters (WCO), a commercial outfitting and guiding business. Farr sold and facilitated Rocky Mountain Big Horn Sheep hunts in an area of the Salmon-Challis National Forest that is closed to commercial guiding. Working as a licensed guide for WCO, Scott illegally guided those hunts.

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement, the U.S. Forest Service, and the Idaho Department of Fish and Game conducted the investigation.


    United States v. Matanuska Diesel, LLC, et al.

    • No. 3:23-CR-00109 (District of Alaska)
    • AUSA Jennifer Ivers
    • RCEC Karla Perrin

    On June 30, 2025, Matanuska Diesel, LLC, and company owner Mackenzie Spurlock pleaded guilty to violating the Clean Air Act for removing air pollution control equipment and tampering with federally mandated monitoring devices on diesel vehicles (42 U.S.C. § 7413(c)(2)(C)).

    Between July 2020 and June 2022, Matanuska Diesel and Spurlock removed air pollution control equipment and tampered with federally mandated monitoring devices on diesel vehicles. The process of removing emissions control systems and reprogramming a vehicle’s onboard diagnostic system is known as “deleting” and “tuning.” These unlawful modifications result in a significant increase in pollutants emitted by the vehicle. The defendants tampered with approximately nine trucks, charging between $1,200 and $5,000 per vehicle for those services.

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Criminal Investigation Division conducted the investigation.


    Sentencings


    United States v. Brandon Baker, et al.

    • No. 1:24-CR-00005 (Middle District of Georgia)
    • ECS Senior Trial Attorney Ethan Eddy
    • ECS Trial Attorney Leigh Rende
    • AUSA Leah McEwen
    • ECS Law Clerk Amanda Backer

    On June 4 and 5, 2025, a court sentenced Brandon Baker and Marvin Pulley, III. Baker will serve 20 months’ incarceration followed by two years of supervised release. Baker also will pay $13,307 in restitution. Pulley will serve 30 months’ incarceration and three years of supervised release. Pulley will pay $33,887 in restitution. They were the final defendants involved in this large-scale dog fighting event.

    On April 24, 2022, the defendants held a dog fight in Donalsonville, Georgia, that authorities disrupted while in progress. The defendants brought 24 pit bull-type dogs to fight in a series of matches over that weekend.

    The participants used their cars to store dogs who had fought, as well as those awaiting their turn in the fighting pit. Dogs found in cars bore recent injuries and scars. Additional dogs were kept on chains on the property. Law enforcement rescued 27 dogs, including a badly injured dog that later died from its injuries.

    On May 13 and 14, 2025, the court imposed sentences ranging from probation to 100 months of incarceration on 11 co-defendants. All were ordered to pay restitution to the U.S. Marshall’s Service for the costs of caring for the seized animals.

    The U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of the Inspector General and the Seminole County, Georgia, Sheriff’s Office conducted the investigation, with assistance from the Bay County, Florida, Sheriff’s Office.


    United States v. All Out Diesel, et al.

    • No. 4:24-CR-00626 (Eastern District of Missouri)
    • AUSA Dianna Edwards

    On June 6, 2025, a court sentenced All Out Diesel, LLC, and company owner Joseph Easter, to pay a $100,000 fine.  The company is jointly liable for the fine and will complete a three-year term of probation, while Easter will complete a five-year term of probation. Both pleaded guilty to violating the Clean Air Act (CAA) for illegally tampering with a federally mandated monitoring device (42 U.S.C. § 7413(c)(2)(C)).

    Truck owners who have removed (or “deleted”) their vehicle’s factory-installed emission control devices need devices that carry electronic files/software coding (”tunes”) designed to override the vehicle’s original computer programming. All Out Diesel custom altered tunes and sold them throughout the United States. The defendants’ tunes enabled deleted trucks to operate without emission control devices.

    The defendants knowingly falsified, tampered with, and rendered inaccurate at least 75 monitoring devices that were required to be maintained under the CAA.

    The United States Environmental Protection Agency Criminal Investigation Division conducted the investigation.


    United States v. Fabcon Precast LLC

    • No. 2:25-CR-00020 (Southern District of Ohio)
    • ECS Senior Trial Attorney Adam Cullman

    On June 9, 2025, a court sentenced Fabcon Precast LLC (“Fabcon”) to pay a $500,000 fine, complete a two-year term of probation and enact a Safety Compliance Plan. Fabcon pleaded guilty to willfully violating the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) causing the death of an employee (29 U.S.C. § 666(e)).

    Fabcon operates several facilities in the United States, including one in Grove City, Ohio, that manufactures precast concrete panels. At Fabcon, employees known as batch operators were responsible for the operation and cleaning of the facility’s only concrete mixer. Concrete was discharged from the bottom of the mixer through a pneumatic door. By design, the mixer had an exhaust valve that released the pneumatic energy powering the discharge door, rendering it inoperable.

    On the day of the incident, batch operator Zachary Ledbetter was on duty when the discharge door failed to close after releasing a batch of concrete. Some months before the incident, the handle that operated the exhaust valve broke off and was not replaced. Because the valve was broken, Ledbetter could not perform the proper procedure to make the door safe to work around. When he attempted to free the door it closed on his head, trapping him. Ledbetter was transported to a hospital where he died five days later.

    The U.S. Department of Labor Office of Inspector General conducted the investigation.

    Related Press Release: Office of Public Affairs | Ohio Company Sentenced for Violating OSHA Rule Leading to Worker’s Death | United States Department of Justice


    United States v. Jose Manuel Valenzuela

    • No. 3:24-CR-01037 (Southern District of California)
    • ECS Assistant Chief Stephen Da Ponte
    • AUSA Laura Sambataro

    On June 10, 2025, a court sentenced Jose Manuel Valenzuela to complete a three-year term of probation and pay $7,399 in restitution. Valenzuela pleaded guilty to intentionally failing to present refrigerant tanks for inspection (19 U.S.C. §§ 1433, 1436).

    On April 22, 2024, Valenzuela, an HVAC technician, attempted to enter the United States from Mexico without declaring four 24-pound tanks of 404A refrigerant (hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants) that were in his vehicle.

    Customs and Border Protection, Homeland Security Investigations, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Criminal Investigation Division conducted the investigation.


    United States v. Bhagavan “Doc” Antle, et al.

    • No. 4:22-CR-00580 (District of South Carolina)
    • ECS Senior Trial Attorney Patrick Duggan
    • AUSA Derek A. Shoemake
    • AUSA Amy Bower
    • ECS Paralegal Jillian Grubb

    On June 10, 2025, a court sentenced Andrew Sawyer to complete a two-year term of probation to include 240 days of home confinement. Sawyer will also forfeit a chimpanzee to the Center for Great Apes, located in Wauchula, Florida. Jason Clay was sentenced to serve four months incarceration, followed by 120 days of home confinement and one year of supervised release. Clay will pay a $4,000 fine into the Lacey Act Reward Fund. On July 8, 2025, Bhagavan “Doc” Antle was sentenced to 12 months in prison and ordered to pay a $55,000 fine, serve three years of supervised release, and forfeit three chimpanzees and more than $197,000.

    Antle owned and operated The Institute for Greatly Endangered and Rare Species (T.I.G.E.R.S.), also known as the Myrtle Beach Safari. The Myrtle Beach Safari is a 50-acre tropical wildlife preserve in Myrtle Beach. Sawyer worked with Antle, and Clay owned and operated the Franklin Drive Thru Safari, a for-profit corporation that also housed captive exotic species and sold tours.

    Antle and Clay illegally trafficked in wildlife (including lemurs, cheetahs, and a chimpanzee) and falsified records in violation of the Endangered Species Act and the Lacey Act. Additionally, Antle and Sawyer laundered more than $500,000 in cash derived from an operation to smuggle illegal immigrants across the Mexican border into the United States. Antle further planned to conceal the cash he received by inflating tourist numbers at the Myrtle Beach Safari. All three pleaded guilty to conspiracy (18 U.S.C. § 371).

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement conducted the investigation.


    United States v. Hollis G. Hale, et al.

    • Nos. 4:25-CR-00018, 4:24-CR-00006 (District of Montana)
    • ECS Senior Trial Attorney Patrick Duggan
    • ECS Trial Attorney Sarah Brown
    • AUSA Jeff Starnes

    On June 11, 2025, a court sentenced Hollis G. Hale to pay a $35,000 fine, complete a four-year term of probation, and perform 100 hours of community service. Hale pleaded guilty to violating the Lacey Act and the Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. §§ 1538(a)(1)(G), 3372(d)(2), 3373(d)(3)(B)). Hale conspired with Jack Schubarth to create giant hybrid sheep for captive hunting. Schubarth smuggled Marco Polo argali sheep parts from Kyrgyzstan into the United States. This protected species of sheep, native to high elevations in the Pamir region of Central Asia, is considered the largest in the world.

    Hale facilitated the purchase and interstate transport of twelve hybrid Marco Polo Argali sheep from Schubarth and falsely identified 43 species of sheep on a Certificate of Veterinary Inspection. Hale falsified these documents, knowing these sheep are prohibited in Montana. Schubarth was sentenced in September 2024 to six months’ incarceration, followed by three years’ supervised release.

    The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Office of Law Enforcement and the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks conducted the investigation.


    View All Environmental Crimes Bulletins

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: World News in Brief: Inter-ethnic violence in Syria, Indigenous Peoples’ rights, global information security

    Source: United Nations 2

    The violence erupted two days after a Druze merchant was abducted on the highway to Damascus.

    The incident marks the latest episode of sectarian bloodshed in Syria, where fears among minority groups have surged since Islamist rebels toppled former dictator Bashar al-Assad in December and installed a new caretaker Government, which is gaining increasing international recognition.

    Those targeted include the Druze sect, an offshoot of Shia Islam.  

    UN voices ‘deep concern’

    On Monday, UN Deputy Special Envoy for Syria, Najat Rochdi, expressed “deep concern” over these reports and urged authorities and stakeholders to “take immediate steps to protect civilians, restore calm and prevent incitement.”

    She also underscored the need for inclusion, trust-building and meaningful dialogue to advance a credible and inclusive political transition in Syria.

    UN human rights chief says ‘wisdom’ of Indigenous Peoples needed in climate change, digital policy upgrades

    The UN human rights chief spoke at a high-level political forum on the rights of Indigenous Peoples on Monday.

    Underscoring how crucial such forums are to advancing the rights of Indigenous Peoples, Volker Türk highlighted developments in Colombia, Finland and Guatemala that have given them more self-determination.

    But despite these advances, violations against Indigenous Peoples’ rights continue.

    Many still lack formal land recognition, while mining activity, deforestation and large-scale agricultural development often cause environmental destruction.

    Indigenous Peoples also experience immense discrimination and face the brunt of climate chaos, Mr. Türk stressed.

    Toll on activists

    Furthermore, data from the human rights office reveals that 26 per cent of rights activists killed in 2023 and 2024 were Indigenous, largely in the Americas.

    Additionally, states are using AI in ways that harm Indigenous Peoples through surveillance, data exploitation and exclusion from decision-making. Türk thus called for human rights-based approaches that uphold Indigenous data sovereignty and self-determination.

    The High Commissioner also called for future policies on climate, digital technologies and other areas to “reflect the wisdom and experience of Indigenous Peoples.”

    “This is not only essential to respect and fulfil the human rights of Indigenous Peoples,” he concluded. “There is growing recognition that the ideas and approaches of Indigenous Peoples hold important lessons for all of us.”

    Guterres welcomes step forward in securing digital technology worldwide

    The UN chief Antonio Guterres on Monday, welcomed the adoption by consensus of the UN Open Ended Working Group on Information and Communication Technologies.

    It was established in 2020 with a five-year mandate to promote regular institutional dialogue and initiatives focused on keeping digital technologies safe and secure.  

    The Secretary-General welcomed the Final Report of 10 July, which summed up the past five years of negotiations, said a statement issued by his Spokesperson.  

    It reflects shared views on current and emerging threats, responsible government policies, international law, norms and efforts such as confidence-building and capacity development.  

    Call for cooperation

    It also establishes a permanent mechanism to continue discussions about responsible State behaviour in the use of information and communications technologies, which the Secretary General particularly appreciated.  

    “The Secretary-General now calls upon all States to work together through the Global Mechanism to tackle digital risks and ensure these technologies are leveraged for good,” the statement said.  

    The Secretary General congratulated the group on its accomplishments, saying the consensus adoption “demonstrates that even in the most challenging international security environment, collective action is still possible.” 

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News in Brief: Sea Breeze 25-2 Concludes Showcasing Unified Mine Warfare Capabilities off UK Coast

    Source: United States Navy

    PORTLAND PORT, England – Exercise Sea Breeze 25-2 officially concluded following two weeks of multinational mine countermeasure operations in the waters off the United Kingdom’s southern coast July 11, 2025.

    Exercise Sea Breeze 25-2 officially concluded following two weeks of multinational mine countermeasure operations in the waters off the United Kingdom’s southern coast July 11, 2025. Naval forces from 14 nations, including NATO allies and partners, demonstrated coordination and enhanced interoperability in a dynamic maritime environment.

    From June 30 to July 11, participating forces from Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Georgia, Greece, Latvia, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Türkiye, the United Kingdom, and the United States conducted joint mine hunting operations, dive and salvage missions, explosive ordnance disposal, and the deployment of cutting-edge robotic and autonomous systems (RAS).

    The culminating demonstration showcased a unified application of these capabilities, reinforcing the collective strength and cohesion of participating nations in high-intensity, multi-domain scenarios.

    “The U.S. Navy’s mission is to keep the seas open. Mines restrict that. Our MCM force is small, so we rely heavily on partners and allies. These exercises ensure we can interoperate and conduct mine countermeasure operations together,” said Capt. William Williams, the commodore of Mine Countermeasures Group 6.

    At the center of the exercise was a fully integrated, combined headquarters that executed advanced staff planning, targeting operations, and command-and-control across a coalition force. The inclusion of RAS, electronic warfare integration, and real-time situational awareness significantly expanded the participating nations’ capacity to operate across domains.

    This year, Exercise Sea Breeze 2025 occurred in two iterations, Sea Breeze 25-1 and 25-2. The first iteration, Sea Breeze 25-1, was hosted by the Romanian Armed Forces at Smardan Range, Romania, June 1-20, 2025.

    Since 1997, Exercise Sea Breeze has brought together Black Sea nations, NATO Allies and partners together to train and operate with NATO members in the pursuit of building increased capabilities. Exercise Sea Breeze 2025 is an annual multinational maritime exercise, involving sea, land, and air components co-hosted by the United States and Ukraine to enhance interoperability and capability among participating forces.

    Commander, U.S. 6th Fleet, headquartered in Naples, Italy, conducts the full spectrum of joint and naval operations, often in concert with allies, international partners, and other U.S. government departments and agencies to advance U.S. national interests, security, and stability in Europe and Africa.

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense Contractor Berg Co. Agrees to Pay $3.3M to Resolve Allegations of Causing Fraudulent Bids

    Source: United States Attorneys General

    Berg Companies Inc. (Berg) has agreed to pay $3.3 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act by submitting, or causing the submission of, false claims under prime vendor contracts with the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), which the Department of Defense (DoD) uses to purchase goods and services.

    Berg, based in Spokane, Washington, manufactures rigid wall shelters and sells them to the federal government, including through various prime vendor programs. In September 2019, Berg was acquired by Hunter Defense Technologies, Inc., which is a defense contractor that is based in Solon, Ohio.

    Berg was a vendor to Noble Sales Co. Inc. doing business as Noble Supply & Logistics (Noble), which is a Boston-based prime contractor to DLA for Maintenance, Repair & Operations (MRO) contracts for the European Command. Under the MRO contracts, the DoD can place orders for goods and services through Noble. Noble is then required to solicit bids from two independently competing vendors for transactions below $25,000 and from three independently competing vendors for transactions at or above $25,000. According to DLA, MRO contracts are “a partnership aimed at achieving infrastructure savings, inventory cost reductions and favorable product pricing through leveraged buying.”

    Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Berg admitted that, from 2019 to 2021, Berg coordinated with Noble and two other Noble vendors to submit inflated quotes for Berg-made rigid wall shelters so that the other vendors would win the awards at inflated prices. In the first scheme, Berg admitted that it coordinated and submitted inflated quotes on two solicitations for the sale of 10 Berg-made rigid wall shelters that Noble awarded to a New Mexico-based vendor. In the second scheme, Berg admitted that it coordinated and submitted inflated quotes on 26 solicitations for the purchase of 29 Berg-made rigid wall shelters that Noble awarded to a Florida-based vendor. As a result of these schemes, the United States contends that the requirements were not competed as required by the prime vendor contract and the military customers were overcharged for the Berg-made rigid wall shelters.

    “Bid rigging of this type inhibits competition on the products and on prices, thereby creating the risk that the government is purchasing inferior products at exorbitant prices,” said Assistant Attorney General Brett Shumate of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “This settlement reinforces the Department’s commitment in using the FCA to pursue anti-competitive fraud.”

    “As evidenced in this settlement agreement, these contractors manipulated and undermined the fair and open bidding process designed to save our military and taxpayers money,” said U.S. Attorney Leah B. Foley for the District of Massachusetts. “We commend Berg for cooperating with the government to resolve this matter and taking responsibility for this conduct. As this settlement demonstrates, not only will my Office continue to use the False Claims Act to help root out fraud, waste and abuse involving taxpayer funds, but it will reward those that accept responsibility and cooperate with the government.”

    “Collusion in government contracting erodes public trust, distorts fair competition, and drives up costs for taxpayers and service members,” said U.S. Attorney Ryan Ellison for the District of New Mexico. “Such conduct undermines the integrity of the procurement process and betrays the public’s expectation that government funds will be used responsibly. This resolution demonstrates our unwavering commitment to protecting taxpayer dollars, ensuring a level playing field for all businesses, and holding accountable those who seek to profit by manipulating federal contracting. We will continue to work closely with our law enforcement partners to defend the integrity of government procurement and safeguard the interests of the American people.”

    “Today’s settlement announcement demonstrates the commitment of the Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS), along with our law enforcement partners, to aggressively pursue those who undermine the integrity of the DoD contracting process,” said Acting Special Agent in Charge Chad Gosch of the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General, DCIS Southwest Field Office. “DCIS will use all available resources to hold accountable those who betray the trust of the American taxpayer by corrupting the DoD procurement system for personal gain.”

    “GSA OIG will continue to work with its investigative partners to hold government contractors accountable for concealing relevant information that may affect the award or performance of government contracts,” said Special Agent in Charge Joseph Dattoria of the U.S. General Services Administration, Office of Inspector General, Northeast Division.

    Berg cooperated with the government in this matter. As part of the settlement, Berg acknowledged and accepted responsibility for the facts that form the basis of this settlement.

    This settlement resolves claims brought against Berg under the qui tam or whistleblower provisions of the FCA, which permit private parties to sue on behalf of the government when they believe that a defendant has submitted false claims for government funds and to receive a share of the recovery. The settlement in this case provides for the whistleblowers, Mark G. Davis and Andrew G. Gunn, to receive a $561,000 share of the recovery. Davis is a U.S. Army veteran and former salesperson for one of the sub-vendors involved in the conspiracy allegation. Gunn is the managing director of a United Kingdom company that manufacturers storage equipment for United States military customers and sold its equipment through this prime vendor’s MRO contracts. The remainder of the matter remains under seal.

    The resolution obtained in this matter was the result of a coordinated effort between the Justice Department’s Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section, and the United States Attorney’s Offices for the District of New Mexico and District of Massachusetts, with assistance from the Defense Criminal Investigative Services, the Army Criminal Investigation Division, the Air Force Office of Special Investigations, and the General Services Administration Office of Inspector General.

    The matter was handled by Trial Attorney Samson Asiyanbi of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, Assistant U.S. Attorney Sean Cunniff of the District of New Mexico, and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Lindsey Ross and Brian LaMacchia of the District of Massachusetts.

    The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: US tariff threat to EU ‘totally unacceptable’: Danish FM

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BRUSSELS, July 14 (Xinhua) — Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen on Monday denounced the U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration’s threat to impose 30 percent tariffs on EU exports as “totally unacceptable” at a joint press conference with European Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic in Brussels.

    L.L. Rasmussen said the EU considers this threat “completely unacceptable and unfounded” and is ready to respond if negotiations with Washington do not produce real results.

    “We intend to continue working with the United States to find an agreed solution,” the Danish Foreign Minister noted, while stressing that the agreement must be “mutually acceptable” to both sides.

    He warned that the EU would respond with decisive and proportionate countermeasures if necessary.

    M. Šefčovič, for his part, said that the 27-country union is preparing possible countermeasures worth 72 billion euros /84 billion US dollars/.

    “We must be prepared for any outcome, including, if necessary, carefully considered and proportionate measures to restore balance in our transatlantic relations,” the European Commissioner said.

    M. Šefčovič noted that, in his opinion, “there is still potential for continuing negotiations,” but stressed that any deal would require the approval of all EU member states and the European Parliament. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: D. Trump announced the sending of American weapons to Ukraine via NATO and threatened Russia with “harsh tariffs”

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    WASHINGTON, July 14 (Xinhua) — U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday announced that the United States would send weapons to Ukraine through NATO and threatened to impose “harsh tariffs” on Russia if a ceasefire agreement in Ukraine is not reached within 50 days.

    D. Trump announced the agreement with NATO to supply weapons to help Ukraine during a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office.

    “We are going to send them weapons, and they will pay for it,” D. Trump announced, adding that the United States will produce these weapons.

    “We are going to impose very tough tariffs if we don’t have an agreement in 50 days,” Trump warned, speaking about Russia.

    As reported by a number of media outlets, the US President indicated that the size of the proposed “secondary duties” will be around 100 percent. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: BRICS expansion is a new era of global cooperation – Chinese Ambassador to Kazakhstan Han Chunlin

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Almaty, July 14 /Xinhua/ — In an exclusive article for DKnews.kz, Chinese Ambassador to Kazakhstan Han Chunlin summed up the results of the 17th BRICS Leaders’ Meeting held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on July 6-7. He noted that the expansion of the BRICS format and the active participation of the Global South countries open a new page in reforming the international order and building a more just and sustainable system of global governance.

    According to the diplomat, Kazakhstan, which has officially become a BRICS partner, plays an important role in this process and strengthens cooperation with China based on mutual trust, openness and strategic partnership.

    Han Chunlin pointed to the advantage of the scale of the expanded BRICS format and recalled the official accession of Indonesia, the largest economy and most populous member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), to BRICS in January 2025.

    “These changes reflect the accelerated movement of the countries of the Global South, led by BRICS, from the periphery to the center of the international arena,” the diplomat noted.

    He also expressed the view that cooperation within the expanded BRICS format has an advantage in concepts.

    According to Han Chunlin, the BRICS countries strive to implement genuine multilateralism, safeguard the international system with the United Nations at its core, maintain and strengthen the multilateral trading system with the World Trade Organization at its core, and oppose the creation of “closed blocs” and “narrow circles”.

    “BRICS countries unanimously call for resolving disputes around international and regional hot spots through dialogue and consultation, rejecting unilateral sanctions and threats of force. BRICS advocates for strengthening political coordination and harmonization of positions, seeking to constructively advance the reform of the existing international system, bringing more inclusiveness, fairness and legitimacy to the global governance system,” the ambassador emphasized.

    He also noted that cooperation within the expanded BRICS format has advantages in development and governance.

    According to Han Chunlin, deepening cooperation within the BRICS framework is an inevitable choice for China and Kazakhstan in their commitment to genuine multilateralism.

    “This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, as well as the 80th anniversary of the founding of the UN. However, the world is still far from calm, and geopolitical conflicts flare up one after another. Maintaining the post-war international order and jointly ensuring peace and stability are the common call of the international community and the common aspiration of China and Kazakhstan,” the diplomat said.

    He is convinced that Kazakhstan’s accession to the BRICS partner countries will further strengthen and expand cooperation, opening a new page in the joint development of the Global South.

    “The Chinese side is ready, together with the Kazakh side, to actively implement the important agreements reached by the heads of the two states, continuously strengthen cooperation within the BRICS framework, firmly protect the international system with the central role of the UN and the international order based on international law, and resolutely and unequivocally defend the common interests of a wide range of developing countries,” the ambassador emphasized.

    “China, using this leaders’ meeting as a milestone, will continue to adhere to the ‘BRICS spirit’ and, together with Kazakhstan and other BRICS partners, will continuously deepen and expand the BRICS cooperation mechanism to promote the development of global governance in a more equitable, rational, efficient and orderly direction. This will consolidate forces to realize the modernization of the Global South based on peaceful development, win-win cooperation and common prosperity, and advance the construction of a community with a shared future for mankind,” Han Chunlin concluded. -0-

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Provocations and incitement of war by armed groups advocating for “Taiwan independence” will only lead to their self-destruction – PRC Ministry of Defense

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, July 14 (Xinhua) — Provocations and warmongering by armed groups advocating “Taiwan independence” are useless and will only lead to their self-destruction, Chinese Defense Ministry spokesman Jiang Bin said Monday.

    Jiang Bin made the statement in response to a journalist’s question about the creation of Taiwan’s first HIMARS multiple launch rocket system battery.

    In order to secure American support for “Taiwan independence,” the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration is selling out Taiwan’s interests to the United States by squandering the Taiwanese people’s hard-earned money to pay for “defense costs,” the official said.

    “Buying American weapons to give oneself courage is absolutely useless and self-deceiving, and resisting reunification by force is a dead end,” Jiang Bin said.

    The official was also asked about the launch of the W121 air route by the Civil Aviation Administration of China, which is a connecting route with the M503 route. The establishment and launch of the relevant air route is a routine action carried out by relevant departments in accordance with the needs of managing the development of civil aviation, and will benefit compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, Jiang Bin noted.

    However, as the official pointed out, the DPP authorities used the event to fan the so-called “military threat from the mainland” in a reckless attempt to raise security concerns, escalate confrontation and hinder cross-coast exchanges, which runs counter to public sentiment and is doomed to fail.

    According to Jiang Bin, the root cause of the current cross-Strait tensions is that the DPP administration, in collusion with external forces, has been continuously carrying out provocations aimed at achieving “independence.”

    “We hope that Taiwanese compatriots will see through the ‘true face’ of the DPP administration advocating ‘Taiwan independence’, recognize the grave danger of separatism, resolutely oppose separatist actions, and jointly safeguard peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait,” the Chinese defense ministry spokesman concluded. -0-

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Risk management tools under the CAP – E-002797/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002797/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Grapini (S&D)

    The risk management tools under the CAP should offer an effective response to crises in order to protect European farmers, without discriminating or differentiating among them.

    Does the Commission not consider that the provisions of Recital 21 and Article 41a(5) of the proposal for a regulation (COM (2025) 236 final) allowing Member States the possibility of national co-financing of up to 200 % (in the form of state aid) in the event of climate disasters could lead to disparities between regions? This could happen owing to the differing potentials of the Member States, which are at different stages of development, and the provision risks undermining the level playing field in the single market.

    Rather than making provision for national co-financing, the financing of the crisis reserve at EU-level could be bolstered, and this used equitably for farmers wherever they are farming.

    Submitted: 9.7.2025

    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Risk management tools under the CAP – E-002797/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002797/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Grapini (S&D)

    The risk management tools under the CAP should offer an effective response to crises in order to protect European farmers, without discriminating or differentiating among them.

    Does the Commission not consider that the provisions of Recital 21 and Article 41a(5) of the proposal for a regulation (COM (2025) 236 final) allowing Member States the possibility of national co-financing of up to 200 % (in the form of state aid) in the event of climate disasters could lead to disparities between regions? This could happen owing to the differing potentials of the Member States, which are at different stages of development, and the provision risks undermining the level playing field in the single market.

    Rather than making provision for national co-financing, the financing of the crisis reserve at EU-level could be bolstered, and this used equitably for farmers wherever they are farming.

    Submitted: 9.7.2025

    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Risk management tools under the CAP – E-002797/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002797/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Grapini (S&D)

    The risk management tools under the CAP should offer an effective response to crises in order to protect European farmers, without discriminating or differentiating among them.

    Does the Commission not consider that the provisions of Recital 21 and Article 41a(5) of the proposal for a regulation (COM (2025) 236 final) allowing Member States the possibility of national co-financing of up to 200 % (in the form of state aid) in the event of climate disasters could lead to disparities between regions? This could happen owing to the differing potentials of the Member States, which are at different stages of development, and the provision risks undermining the level playing field in the single market.

    Rather than making provision for national co-financing, the financing of the crisis reserve at EU-level could be bolstered, and this used equitably for farmers wherever they are farming.

    Submitted: 9.7.2025

    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Risk management tools under the CAP – E-002797/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002797/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Grapini (S&D)

    The risk management tools under the CAP should offer an effective response to crises in order to protect European farmers, without discriminating or differentiating among them.

    Does the Commission not consider that the provisions of Recital 21 and Article 41a(5) of the proposal for a regulation (COM (2025) 236 final) allowing Member States the possibility of national co-financing of up to 200 % (in the form of state aid) in the event of climate disasters could lead to disparities between regions? This could happen owing to the differing potentials of the Member States, which are at different stages of development, and the provision risks undermining the level playing field in the single market.

    Rather than making provision for national co-financing, the financing of the crisis reserve at EU-level could be bolstered, and this used equitably for farmers wherever they are farming.

    Submitted: 9.7.2025

    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Risk management tools under the CAP – E-002797/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002797/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Maria Grapini (S&D)

    The risk management tools under the CAP should offer an effective response to crises in order to protect European farmers, without discriminating or differentiating among them.

    Does the Commission not consider that the provisions of Recital 21 and Article 41a(5) of the proposal for a regulation (COM (2025) 236 final) allowing Member States the possibility of national co-financing of up to 200 % (in the form of state aid) in the event of climate disasters could lead to disparities between regions? This could happen owing to the differing potentials of the Member States, which are at different stages of development, and the provision risks undermining the level playing field in the single market.

    Rather than making provision for national co-financing, the financing of the crisis reserve at EU-level could be bolstered, and this used equitably for farmers wherever they are farming.

    Submitted: 9.7.2025

    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Presentation of the CAP after 2027 by Commissioner Hansen – Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development

    Source: European Parliament

    Christophe Hansen, European Commissioner for Agriculture © European Union, 2024

    At its meeting on 16 July, the College of Commissioners is likely to adopt the post-2027 multiannual financial framework package, including the first set of sectoral proposals. Commissioner Hansen will present the proposal on the common agricultural policy after 2027 which is supposed to be part of the package in the afternoon of the same day in ComAGRI and answer questions from MEPs.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Presentation of the CAP after 2027 by Commissioner Hansen – Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development

    Source: European Parliament

    Christophe Hansen, European Commissioner for Agriculture © European Union, 2024

    At its meeting on 16 July, the College of Commissioners is likely to adopt the post-2027 multiannual financial framework package, including the first set of sectoral proposals. Commissioner Hansen will present the proposal on the common agricultural policy after 2027 which is supposed to be part of the package in the afternoon of the same day in ComAGRI and answer questions from MEPs.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Definition and declaration of an international health emergency – E-001491/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. A ‘health emergency’ definition is not included in EU legislation. However, Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371[1] defines a serious cross-border threat to health. Internationally, a public health emergency of international concern is set in the International Health Regulations[2].

    2. The EU can recognise a public health emergency on its own. The procedure for the recognition is set in Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371[3], which foresees a consultation with relevant agencies and bodies[4]. The recognition has a form of an implementing act, requiring a favourable opinion of the Member States. The Commission does not have to consult the World Health Organisation (WHO) before the recognition, but should nonetheless inform the WHO about its intention to adopt such decision.

    3. The substantial conditions for the recognition stem from Articles 2(1) and 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371. In particular, the cross-border nature of a health threat and the need for EU-level coordination must be identified.

    • [1] Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371: ‘serious cross-border threat to health’ means a life-threatening or otherwise serious hazard to health of biological, chemical, environmental or unknown origin, as referred to in Article 2(1), which spreads or entails a significant risk of spreading across the national borders of Member States, and which may necessitate coordination at Union level in order to ensure a high level of human health protection (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2022:314:FULL&from=EN).
    • [2] https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/246107/9789241580496-eng.pdf (Article 6 and Annex II of the International Health Regulations).
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R2371&qid=1673887469777.
    • [4] The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, or the Advisory Committee on public health emergencies (referred to in Article 24 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371) or any other relevant Union agency or body.
    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Definition and declaration of an international health emergency – E-001491/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. A ‘health emergency’ definition is not included in EU legislation. However, Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371[1] defines a serious cross-border threat to health. Internationally, a public health emergency of international concern is set in the International Health Regulations[2].

    2. The EU can recognise a public health emergency on its own. The procedure for the recognition is set in Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371[3], which foresees a consultation with relevant agencies and bodies[4]. The recognition has a form of an implementing act, requiring a favourable opinion of the Member States. The Commission does not have to consult the World Health Organisation (WHO) before the recognition, but should nonetheless inform the WHO about its intention to adopt such decision.

    3. The substantial conditions for the recognition stem from Articles 2(1) and 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371. In particular, the cross-border nature of a health threat and the need for EU-level coordination must be identified.

    • [1] Article 3(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371: ‘serious cross-border threat to health’ means a life-threatening or otherwise serious hazard to health of biological, chemical, environmental or unknown origin, as referred to in Article 2(1), which spreads or entails a significant risk of spreading across the national borders of Member States, and which may necessitate coordination at Union level in order to ensure a high level of human health protection (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2022:314:FULL&from=EN).
    • [2] https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/246107/9789241580496-eng.pdf (Article 6 and Annex II of the International Health Regulations).
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32022R2371&qid=1673887469777.
    • [4] The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, or the Advisory Committee on public health emergencies (referred to in Article 24 of Regulation (EU) 2022/2371) or any other relevant Union agency or body.
    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Revision of Directive 2011/64/EU and growth of the shadow economy – E-002810/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002810/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Marlena Maląg (ECR)

    Directive 2011/64/EU established minimum excise duties on manufactured tobacco in the European Union, giving Member States the freedom to set higher rates based on their own circumstances. The Law and Justice Party Government of 2015-2023 made use of this freedom to pursue a policy of moderate excise duty increases, which led to a reduction in the shadow economy and growth in budgetary revenue in Poland. In 2024, Donald Tusk’s new governing coalition decided to significantly increase these rates, which has already led to a growth in the shadow economy, according to market analyses. Similar observations have been made in the Netherlands, which has seen an increase in the consumption of cigarettes without excise duty having been paid.

    In relation to the above:

    • 1.Has the Commission assessed the risk of the shadow economy growing as a result of the possible revision of Directive 2011/64/EU and the increase in minimum rates?
    • 2.Does the Commission have data available on the impact of increases in excise duties on the rate of illegal trade of processed tobacco in Member States?
    • 3.Has the Commission taken into account differences in purchasing power and geographic location of Member States when developing new legislative proposals on tobacco taxation?

    Submitted: 9.7.2025

    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Establishing a housing fund and doubling funds – E-001262/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission agrees with the Honourable Member that the housing crisis impacts a large number of European citizens. In response to the housing crisis, the Commission will put forward a European Affordable Housing Plan (‘the EHAP’) in 2026.

    The Commission notes, that in respect of the subsidiarity and proportionality principles, primary responsibility for affordable and social housing is within the remit of Member States, regional and local authorities and the EAHP will respect these principles.

    In addition, the Commission put forward a — mid-term review — legislative proposal to modernise cohesion policy[1] including incentives to encourage Member States and regions to double their investments in affordable housing under the Cohesion policy.

    The relevant legislation on European funds and programmes[2] available for Member States, regions and local authorities for housing contain rules on governance, including allocation mechanism[3], and follow the said principles, in line with the current Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF).

    Any future budgetary provisions, including the allocation methodology, will be decided by co-legislators at the next MFF negotiations. In addition, the recent communication on NextGenerationEU[4] explicitly recognises the possibility to inject equity to national promotional banks, also for affordable housing.

    The Commission will continue to strengthen its contribution to mitigating the housing crisis, including for youth in its future actions.

    The Commission aims to cut unnecessary red tape and simplify processes[5] in order that available funding can be disbursed as quick as possible. On this matter the Commission works in close cooperation with the managing authorities and other relevant bodies.

    • [1] Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review, COM(2025) 123.
    • [2] Most importantly the Recovery and Resilience Plans, the European Regional Development Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund, the European Social Fund+ and the InvestEU programme.
    • [3] For Cohesion policy Funds, the methodology on allocation of global resources per Member State is defined by Annex XXVI of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy.
    • [4] Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council NextGenerationEU — The road to 2026, COM/2025/310 final (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0310).
    • [5] In general, simplification is a key objective of the Commission, as evidenced also by the simplification omnibuses and the mentioned NextGenerationEU communication.
      Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A Competitiveness Compass for the EU COM/2025/30 final (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52025DC0030&qid=1750151442346).

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Establishing a housing fund and doubling funds – E-001262/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission agrees with the Honourable Member that the housing crisis impacts a large number of European citizens. In response to the housing crisis, the Commission will put forward a European Affordable Housing Plan (‘the EHAP’) in 2026.

    The Commission notes, that in respect of the subsidiarity and proportionality principles, primary responsibility for affordable and social housing is within the remit of Member States, regional and local authorities and the EAHP will respect these principles.

    In addition, the Commission put forward a — mid-term review — legislative proposal to modernise cohesion policy[1] including incentives to encourage Member States and regions to double their investments in affordable housing under the Cohesion policy.

    The relevant legislation on European funds and programmes[2] available for Member States, regions and local authorities for housing contain rules on governance, including allocation mechanism[3], and follow the said principles, in line with the current Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF).

    Any future budgetary provisions, including the allocation methodology, will be decided by co-legislators at the next MFF negotiations. In addition, the recent communication on NextGenerationEU[4] explicitly recognises the possibility to inject equity to national promotional banks, also for affordable housing.

    The Commission will continue to strengthen its contribution to mitigating the housing crisis, including for youth in its future actions.

    The Commission aims to cut unnecessary red tape and simplify processes[5] in order that available funding can be disbursed as quick as possible. On this matter the Commission works in close cooperation with the managing authorities and other relevant bodies.

    • [1] Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review, COM(2025) 123.
    • [2] Most importantly the Recovery and Resilience Plans, the European Regional Development Fund, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund, the European Social Fund+ and the InvestEU programme.
    • [3] For Cohesion policy Funds, the methodology on allocation of global resources per Member State is defined by Annex XXVI of Regulation (EU) 2021/1060 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 laying down common provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund Plus, the Cohesion Fund, the Just Transition Fund and the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and financial rules for those and for the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the Internal Security Fund and the Instrument for Financial Support for Border Management and Visa Policy.
    • [4] Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council NextGenerationEU — The road to 2026, COM/2025/310 final (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0310).
    • [5] In general, simplification is a key objective of the Commission, as evidenced also by the simplification omnibuses and the mentioned NextGenerationEU communication.
      Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A Competitiveness Compass for the EU COM/2025/30 final (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52025DC0030&qid=1750151442346).

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Imports of sheep and goats from countries with active foot-and-mouth disease – E-001823/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has adopted emergency measures[1] pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/429[2] and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/687[3].

    These measures include restrictions on the movement of susceptible animals and products from the affected areas. The definition of such restricted areas ensures safe trade from non-restricted areas of the EU, including affected Member States.

    Consignments of live animals from different restricted areas are only authorised if all conditions laid down in Union law are met, including pre-export quarantine and veterinary certification.

    Compliance with these requirements falls under the responsibility of the competent authorities of the Member States concerned. Member States must record the results of checks performed on animals involved in intra-EU trade in TRACES and their performance can be monitored during Commission audits.

    • [1] Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/672 of 31 March 2025 concerning certain emergency measures relating to outbreaks of foot and mouth disease in Hungary and Slovakia and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/613 (OJ L, 2025/672, 2.4.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2025/672/oj).
    • [2] Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (OJ L 84, 31.3.2016, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/429/oj).
    • [3] Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 of 17 December 2019 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards rules for the prevention and control of certain listed diseases (OJ L 174, 3.6.2020, p. 64, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2020/687/oj).
    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Imports of sheep and goats from countries with active foot-and-mouth disease – E-001823/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has adopted emergency measures[1] pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2016/429[2] and Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/687[3].

    These measures include restrictions on the movement of susceptible animals and products from the affected areas. The definition of such restricted areas ensures safe trade from non-restricted areas of the EU, including affected Member States.

    Consignments of live animals from different restricted areas are only authorised if all conditions laid down in Union law are met, including pre-export quarantine and veterinary certification.

    Compliance with these requirements falls under the responsibility of the competent authorities of the Member States concerned. Member States must record the results of checks performed on animals involved in intra-EU trade in TRACES and their performance can be monitored during Commission audits.

    • [1] Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/672 of 31 March 2025 concerning certain emergency measures relating to outbreaks of foot and mouth disease in Hungary and Slovakia and repealing Implementing Decision (EU) 2025/613 (OJ L, 2025/672, 2.4.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2025/672/oj).
    • [2] Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (‘Animal Health Law’) (OJ L 84, 31.3.2016, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/429/oj).
    • [3] Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/687 of 17 December 2019 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/429 of the European Parliament and the Council, as regards rules for the prevention and control of certain listed diseases (OJ L 174, 3.6.2020, p. 64, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2020/687/oj).
    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Information on the first-ever European-wide enquiry on the impact of social media on the well-being of young people – E-001411/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. As outlined in the mission letter to the Commissioner for Health and Animal Welfare, the Commission will carry out an EU-wide inquiry on the broader impacts of social media and related excessive screentime on wellbeing and mental health, especially of children and young people. This initiative may include the collection of relevant data and consultations with key stakeholders. The scope, methodology and timeline of the inquiry are being developed.

    This inquiry will build on enforcement actions currently under way in the context of the Digital Services Act[1], where the Commission is investigating mental health risks on social media platforms including TikTok[2] and Meta[3].

    2. The Commission is also preparing an action plan to tackle cyberbullying. It would aim to develop a shared definition of cyberbullying; map national best practices to scale them up at EU level; foster cooperation with industry and civil society; and encourage a culture of seeking support and reporting cyberbullying.

    The Commission services responsible for the inquiry and the action plan are working closely to ensure that the inquiry builds on and reinforces the existing work on mental health and social media, and that it aligns with the upcoming Digital Fairness Act.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2065/oj/eng.
    • [2] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_926.
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_2664.
    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Consequences of the war in Sudan in North Africa – E-001636/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As a key humanitarian and development aid donor, the Commission is acutely aware that conflicts — particularly the war in Sudan — have generated significant protection needs for displaced populations, many of whom have fled to neighbouring countries, notably Egypt and Libya.

    The North Africa region remains a destination and transit point for migrants, refugees and asylum seekers, including unaccompanied children.

    As a result of their fragile legal status, displaced people are exposed to insecurity, threats, harassment, sexual and gender-based violence, and forced recruitment.

    The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) receives EU funding across the whole North Africa region, with a primary focus on protection and refugee status determination.

    However, the agency faces alarming levels of underfunding in the region. In 2024, the United States alone accounted for approximately 38% of its funding in the region, with contributions reaching as high as 47% in the case of Egypt.

    The Commission remains strongly committed to supporting UNHCR in North Africa to ensure the continued delivery of critical life-saving assistance, such as food and water, sanitation and hygiene, as well as to strengthen the protection and resilience of vulnerable people.

    This includes efforts to enhance access to basic education and health services. The Commission will continue to support people in need in Egypt and Libya, working through UNHCR and other mandated United Nations agencies.

    In parallel, the Commission will also support the reinforcement of national asylum systems by providing technical assistance, capacity-building, and targeted training to local stakeholders.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Consequences of the war in Sudan in North Africa – E-001636/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As a key humanitarian and development aid donor, the Commission is acutely aware that conflicts — particularly the war in Sudan — have generated significant protection needs for displaced populations, many of whom have fled to neighbouring countries, notably Egypt and Libya.

    The North Africa region remains a destination and transit point for migrants, refugees and asylum seekers, including unaccompanied children.

    As a result of their fragile legal status, displaced people are exposed to insecurity, threats, harassment, sexual and gender-based violence, and forced recruitment.

    The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) receives EU funding across the whole North Africa region, with a primary focus on protection and refugee status determination.

    However, the agency faces alarming levels of underfunding in the region. In 2024, the United States alone accounted for approximately 38% of its funding in the region, with contributions reaching as high as 47% in the case of Egypt.

    The Commission remains strongly committed to supporting UNHCR in North Africa to ensure the continued delivery of critical life-saving assistance, such as food and water, sanitation and hygiene, as well as to strengthen the protection and resilience of vulnerable people.

    This includes efforts to enhance access to basic education and health services. The Commission will continue to support people in need in Egypt and Libya, working through UNHCR and other mandated United Nations agencies.

    In parallel, the Commission will also support the reinforcement of national asylum systems by providing technical assistance, capacity-building, and targeted training to local stakeholders.

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Lack of transparency on allegedly manipulated EMA vaccine documents and implications for public trust and foreign interference – E-001401/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission would like to stress that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) cyberattack in 2020 was successfully contained without affecting the evaluation and approval of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics.

    The EMA swiftly launched a full investigation, in close cooperation with the Dutch police, the Cybersecurity Service for the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies (CERT-EU) and Europol, the EU agency for law enforcement cooperation. The law enforcement investigation did not confirm the identities of the suspects involved in this criminal attack.

    The EMA remains vigilant and has subsequently further strengthened its defensive cybersecurity capabilities to be better prepared for cyberattacks.

    The EMA has also published a wealth of information about the evaluation of COVID-19 vaccines, including the clinical data submitted for assessment and the detailed assessment reports. The cyberattack did not impact the integrity of the data that were assessed by the EMA.

    The Commission and the EMA would like to stress the importance of consulting reliable information sources and refer the public to the documents published on the EMA website.

    The EMA will continue releasing documents to the public in line with its legal obligations and its transparency policy.

    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Foreign investment in private education and its impact on public education in the European Union – E-002794/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002794/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nikos Pappas (The Left)

    Education is a fundamental public good, with the EU committed – through Regulation (EU) 2021/817 – to promoting quality and equality. It is crucial that recent developments in private education do not undermine these objectives.

    In recent years, there has been an increasing infiltration of foreign investment capital into private education in Member States such as Greece, Italy, Cyprus and the Netherlands. International investment groups are acquiring educational institutions, which raises questions about the impact on public education, equal access and social cohesion. In some cases, inequalities are increasing and there is a risk of ‘two-tier education’.

    In view of the above:

    • 1.How does the Commission assess the increasing presence of foreign investment capital in private education in the Member States and the possible impact on public education?
    • 2.What measures does the Commission intend to put in place to ensure that the infiltration of foreign capital does not lead to inequalities in access to and quality of education provided?
    • 3.How does the Commission intend to support Member States in strengthening and upgrading public education so that it remains competitive and attractive for students and their families?

    Submitted: 9.7.2025

    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 15, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 138 139 140 141 142 … 1,780
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress