Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Request for clarification on the interpretation of Article 4(2) of Directive 2013/29/EU – E-001796/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. Article 4(2) of Directive 2013/29/EU[1] enables Member States to take measures to prohibit or restrict the possession, use and/or the sale to the general public of category F2 and F3 fireworks, theatrical pyrotechnic articles and other pyrotechnic articles, which are justified on grounds of public order, security, health and safety, or environmental protection. The directive does not allow for national restrictions on the making available on the market of professional fireworks beyond the provisions of the directive. However, the directive does not prevent Member States from restricting professional firework displays to certain areas or time periods, as long as this does not restrict or hinder the making available on the market.

    2. According to Articles 6 and 7 of the directive, category F4 fireworks are intended for use only by persons with specialist knowledge and may only be made available to such persons. The prohibition of access of the general public to fireworks of category F4 is therefore mandated by the directive.

    3. Article 4(2) refers to the general public only and allows Member State to prohibit not only the sale to, but also the possession and use by the general public of the articles concerned.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32013L0029.
    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Study – An update on the economic, sustainability and regulatory effects of the trade part of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement – 14-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    This report assesses the economic, sustainability and regulatory effects of the trade part of the EU-Mercosur Partnership Agreement (EUMETA), with a focus on developments between the 2019 and 2024 revisions of the agreement. In our assessment, the macroeconomic effects of the agreement remain positive albeit moderate, with most of the gains concentrated in the EU industry. Developments since the 2019 and 2024 iterations of the EUMETA have significantly reduced sustainability-related risks. On the EU side, a suite of unilateral measures reinforces deforestation-free product standards, thereby mitigating potential climate effects, and bolsters labour rights across international value chains, independently of any trade agreement. Meanwhile, CO2 emissions in Mercosur countries have fallen and deforestation rates have declined. Against the backdrop of escalating global trade tensions, the economic and political benefits of EUMETA appear to outweigh the remaining risks. These risks are being managed both through safeguards built into EUMETA and through an array of other instruments beyond the agreement (agricultural support fund and unilateral sustainability measures.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Revision of the CO2 emission standards for cars and vans – P-002795/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002795/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Massimiliano Salini (PPE), Fulvio Martusciello (PPE), Caterina Chinnici (PPE), Salvatore De Meo (PPE), Marco Falcone (PPE), Letizia Moratti (PPE), Giusi Princi (PPE), Flavio Tosi (PPE)

    On 7 July 2025, the Commission opened a public consultation on the revision of Regulation (EU) 2019/631[1] concerning CO₂ standards for cars and vans. The published document raises serious concerns, as several of its measures appear inadequate to effectively support the automotive sector, which is currently facing a profound crisis.

    A key concern is the indicative timeline, as the proposal is expected in the second quarter of 2026, despite earlier Commission commitments to bring the revision forward to the end of 2025. The previously adopted amendment, granting a three-year flexibility period for manufacturers, should have been only temporary relief, not a structural solution to a regulatory framework that remains highly ideological.

    Another major issue is the narrow interpretation of technological neutrality, which focuses solely on e-fuels while neglecting other renewable fuels, undermining the principle set out in recital 11 of the Regulation.

    Additionally, the regulation applicable to heavy-duty vehicles[2], revision of which is scheduled for 2027, sets even more unrealistic targets. This treatment disparity risks penalising an industry already under pressure where targeted measures are needed.

    Does the Commission intend to bring forward the revision to the end of 2025, as previously anticipated, and align the revision timeline for heavy-duty vehicles with that of light-duty vehicles?

    Submitted: 9.7.2025

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of 17 April 2019 setting CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and for new light commercial vehicles, OJ L 111, 25.4.2019, p. 13, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/631/oj.
    • [2] Regulation (EU) 2019/1242 of 20 June 2019 setting CO2 emission performance standards for new heavy-duty vehicles, OJ L 198, 25.7.2019, p. 202, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/1242/oj.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Considering Colombia a ‘safe country of origin’ – E-002756/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002756/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Pernando Barrena Arza (The Left)

    In a meeting with the European network the International Office for Human Rights Action on Colombia (Oidhaco) and the Colombian platform CCEEU, we were informed about the serious situation of human rights defenders in Colombia. In their latest reports, Global Witness and Front Line Defenders conclude that Colombia is the most dangerous country in the world for human rights defenders and in particular for community leaders, indigenous peoples and those who defend territory and the environment. Front Line Defenders states that of the 324 human rights defenders killed in the world, 157 were killed in Colombia. According to the INDEPAZ observatory, from 1 January 2025 to 20 May 2025, 65 human rights defenders and social leaders were assassinated. The armed conflict is also affecting more and more population groups. The Ombudsman’s Office of Colombia identified at least 11 critical humanitarian emergency hotspots and the presence of non-state armed actors in 73 % of the national territory.

    • 1.Against this bleak backdrop, how can the Commission consider including Colombia on a list of safe countries of origin?
    • 2.Beyond calculations based on the number of asylum requests and rejection rates – which vary greatly from country to country – what were the criteria used by the Commission?

    Submitted: 7.7.2025

    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – France-UK bilateral refugee agreement – a threat for countries of first entry – E-002753/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002753/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nikolaos Anadiotis (NI)

    According to reports in the international press, France and the United Kingdom are negotiating a ‘one in, one out’ deal, meaning that for each irregular migrant returned to France from the Channel, an asylum seeker from France will be accepted for family reunification in the UK[1]. The five countries of first entry (Greece, Italy, Spain, Cyprus, Malta) have expressed their opposition, noting that this agreement could circumvent European law and place a strain on the southern states.

    The planned approach appears to be at odds with the principles of the new regulation on asylum management (Regulation (EU) 2024/1358) and Article 78 TFEU on a common European asylum system.

    In view of the above, can the Commission answer the following:

    • 1.What is its legal assessment of the UK-France agreement under negotiation, in relation to EU asylum law?
    • 2.What measures will it take to ensure that countries of first entry, such as Greece, are not placed under additional strain?
    • 3.Does it intend to call for transparency or approval for such bilateral agreements when they affect the very heart of European immigration policy?

    Submitted: 7.7.2025

    • [1] https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/uk-and-france-discuss-one-in-one-out-migrant-returns-wjlgr66ms
    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Clarification on alleged financing of the NGO ClientEarth by the Commission, part 1 – E-002488/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002488/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Anna Bryłka (PfE)

    In the light of a recent media report published in the Brussels Signal on 10 June 2025 citing

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Possibilities of strengthening data security within public procurement regulation – E-001462/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission confirms that ‘data security’ can be used in public procurement as a technical specifications requirement or as part of the awarding criteria.

    It is up to the public buyers to define the adequate procurement solution that meets their specific needs and reflect it adequately in the tender documents.

    The evaluation of the EU public procurement framework is ongoing. Security aspects, including data security, are discussed in this context.

    Once the evaluation is concluded, its outcome will be taken into account in the impact assessment of the forthcoming revision. As a principle, public procurement regulates only the process of purchasing. Public buyers have already various ways to include security aspects in their tenders.

    From the general cybersecurity perspective, the Commission is monitoring the current transposition of the Network and Information Systems (NIS2) Directive[1] which requires entities from 18 critical sectors to take organisational cybersecurity risk-management measures to protect their network and information systems, which include the digital data stored, processed, retrieved or transmitted.

    The Commission is also monitoring and supporting the implementation of the Cyber Resilience Act[2], which ensures, among others, cybersecurity by design (including protection of processed data) of products with digital elements placed on the EU market as of 11 December 2027.

    • [1] Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union, amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972, and repealing Directive (EU) 2016/1148 (NIS 2 Directive) (Text with EEA relevance).
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:02024R2847-20241120.
    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU action on gambling companies in Malta – E-002772/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002772/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Daniel Freund (Verts/ALE)

    Gambling companies in Europe are extremely concentrated in Malta. There are 321 such companies with a Maltese licence[1].

    The largest companies are: Flutter (TSG Interactive, PokerStars), Hillside (bet365), 888 (Mr. Green), Betsson, Super Group (Betway), and Tipico.

    Another deeply concerning matter is the Maltese Gaming Act (Chapter 583 of the Laws of Malta)[2], which hinders the enforcement of rulings handed down by courts in other Member States against Maltese-licensed gabling companies. After almost two years of reviewing the compatibility of Malta’s Gaming Act with EU law, the Commission has recently decided to open an infringement procedure against Malta.

    • 1.Can the Commission state whether any gambling company in Malta benefits from EU funding, whether through direct or indirect management?
    • 2.Can the Commission provide a detailed explanation of why it took nearly two years to review the Gaming Act and reach this decision, and can it provide access to the written exchanges on this case between Malta and the Commission in order to make this lengthy process more comprehensible?

    Submitted: 8.7.2025

    • [1] https://www.mga.org.mt/licensee-hub/licensee-register/.
    • [2] Malta Government Gazette, 1 August 2018, https://legislation.mt/eli/cap/583/eng.
    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU action on gambling companies in Malta – E-002772/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002772/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Daniel Freund (Verts/ALE)

    Gambling companies in Europe are extremely concentrated in Malta. There are 321 such companies with a Maltese licence[1].

    The largest companies are: Flutter (TSG Interactive, PokerStars), Hillside (bet365), 888 (Mr. Green), Betsson, Super Group (Betway), and Tipico.

    Another deeply concerning matter is the Maltese Gaming Act (Chapter 583 of the Laws of Malta)[2], which hinders the enforcement of rulings handed down by courts in other Member States against Maltese-licensed gabling companies. After almost two years of reviewing the compatibility of Malta’s Gaming Act with EU law, the Commission has recently decided to open an infringement procedure against Malta.

    • 1.Can the Commission state whether any gambling company in Malta benefits from EU funding, whether through direct or indirect management?
    • 2.Can the Commission provide a detailed explanation of why it took nearly two years to review the Gaming Act and reach this decision, and can it provide access to the written exchanges on this case between Malta and the Commission in order to make this lengthy process more comprehensible?

    Submitted: 8.7.2025

    • [1] https://www.mga.org.mt/licensee-hub/licensee-register/.
    • [2] Malta Government Gazette, 1 August 2018, https://legislation.mt/eli/cap/583/eng.
    Last updated: 14 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Speech by FS at reception in celebration of 2025 Bastille Day (English only)

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region – 4

    Following is the speech by the Financial Secretary, Mr Paul Chan, at the reception in celebration of 2025 Bastille Day today (July 14):

    Consul General Christile Drulhe (Consul General of France in Hong Kong and Macau), Deputy Commissioner Li Yongsheng (Deputy Commissioner of the Office of the Commissioner of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region), distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, 

    Bon soir. Good evening. 

    It’s a great pleasure to be here with you, tonight, in honour of Bastille Day, a day of surpassing joy throughout France, and one that resonates far beyond its borders, including right here in Hong Kong. 

    Tonight is a wonderful opportunity to reflect on the strong and deepening ties between France and Hong Kong. They are thriving, and in so many promising ways.

    France remains one of Hong Kong’s most important trading partners in the European Union, with our bilateral trade in goods reaching around EUR9 billion last year. And Hong Kong, I must say, is a passionate admirer of French products. French elegance is quite literally everywhere in this city, especially when you count the handbags carried and the fashion worn by men and women in this city.

    And of course, our enduring love for Bordeaux and Burgundy wines, champagnes and, increasingly, fine French liquors and spirits, continues to flourish, as the Consul General rightly mentioned earlier.

    We are also seeing a growing interest from French companies and professionals in the opportunities here in Hong Kong. Last year, around 350 French companies operated here, spanning a wide range of industries. French technologies and expertise have long contributed to Hong Kong’s development in such areas as smart mobility, energy efficiency, construction engineering and waste management. 

    I believe more are on the way. Notably, a global leader in aeronautical services from France will establish facilities in Hong Kong for aircraft dismantling, parts recycling, and manpower training. This investment aligns with our vision of becoming a regional hub for aircraft parts processing and trading. The company also has plans to set up ancillary operations in Zhuhai. It shows how we are joining hands to bring French industrial excellence into the Greater Bay Area. 

    In the innovation and technology sector, France ranks among the top three international sources of start-up founders in Hong Kong. It not only reflects French entrepreneurial spirit, but also the vast potential of our tech co-operation.

    And I’m pleased to note that in the first half of this year alone, over 74 000 French visitors came to Hong Kong, a 9 per cent year-on-year increase. We hope many more will follow.

    Looking ahead, I am confident that the relationship between Hong Kong and France will continue to grow from strength to strength, especially in the broader context of the ever-deepening China-France relationship.

    Last year, our country became the largest Asian investor in France, and Hong Kong continues to be a vital conduit for Mainland investments into Europe, and as a springboard for Mainland companies expanding into the continent. At the same time, we remain the gateway of choice for French and European enterprises seeking opportunities in China and across Asia.

    That role is more important than ever today. In a world beset with uncertainty – geopolitical risks, tariff chaos, and the rise of protectionism and unilateralism – we stand to support and benefit from stronger co-operation between China and France, and between Asia and Europe.

    Hong Kong stands as a steadfast “super connector”, a reassuring beacon of free and open trade, a champion of cross-border investment, and an international city of stability, diversity and opportunity.

    This is evident in our financial markets. Last year, the Hong Kong stock market recorded an 18 per cent gain, and has grown by another 20 per cent so far this year. This year, we raised around EUR14 billion through IPOs so far, putting us the leading IPO market in the world. International investors, including European ones, are playing key roles as cornerstone participants. And since last September, waves of capital from the US and Europe flowed into our markets, as global investors recognised that they might have under-weighted their allocations to the Greater China region, particularly in the technology and green energy sectors. 

    In short, the world, and its capital, has turned to Hong Kong as a safe, welcoming and reliable haven.

    More and more, the international community are rediscovering the strengths of Hong Kong’s “one country, two systems” framework. A cornerstone of it is our unwavering commitment to the rule of law, underpinned by the common law system and a judiciary exercising powers independently. Over the past few years, the restoration of stability as well as law and order has not only safeguarded the rights and freedoms of our people, but also reinforced Hong Kong’s appeal as a safe and world-class business destination.

    This is reflected in our rising position in various international competitiveness rankings and positive feedback we continue to receive from foreign businesses operating here.

    Ladies and gentlemen, as the Consul General noted earlier, there is so much more that Hong Kong and France can do together – in technology, housing, education, arts and culture, and in celebrating the many pleasures of life. I look forward to more exchanges and deeper collaboration between our two communities.

    And that should include a visit by the Champions League winners, or better yet, Les Bleus, to our world-class Kai Tak Stadium. 

    Let us continue to build lasting bonds between Hong Kong and France, France and Hong Kong.

    Merci beaucoup. Thank you very much.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Boilermakers win Nichiha vote to unionize

    Source: US International Brotherhood of Boilermakers

    Ultimately, Nichiha workers’ unity and determination made this win possible. It’s a milestone that will shape a better future for them and their families, and it’s the beginning of positive changes ahead.

    Carlos Brooks, Southeast Area Organizer

    Over the weekend, workers at Nichiha in Macon, Georgia, voted in favor of unionizing with the Boilermakers union. More than 250 workers turned out for the vote, with 55% voting “yes” for the union. Nichiha manufactures fiber cement siding panels that are primarily used in residential construction.

    Southeast Area Organizer Carlos Brooks led organizing efforts, which began several months ago. Among his organizing tactics, he used texting and social media campaigns, as well as fliers and other visual material. Most importantly, Brooks and others maintained a Boilermaker presence at the Nichiha facility to talk with workers and answer questions.

    “This was a highly vocal campaign,” Brooks said. “I spent significant time at the gates and responding to employees’ concerns via text messages.”

    He said that throughout the campaign workers raised serious concerns about their work environment, including promised raises that were never delivered, unsafe and extremely hot working conditions, unfair promotion practices and more. Nichiha’s attempts to discredit the Boilermakers union failed.

    “The success of this campaign was led by Brother Brooks and assisted by Erica Stewart (Diversity Organizer and Recruiting Coordinator, M.O.R.E. WIF),” said Don Hamric, Executive Director-ISO/Director of Research and Collective Bargaining. “They used their years of experience as union leaders to listen to the employees’ grievances and offered suggestions on how to combat those grievances.”

    Several Boilermakers from Brooks’ home local, L-D23 (Clinchfield, Georgia), also assisted with the campaign: Retiree Milton Taylor, Secretary-Treasurer Edwin Allen, Jr. and Trustee Chairman Riccardo Askew.

    “Ultimately, Nichiha workers’ unity and determination made this win possible,” Brooks said. “It’s a milestone that will shape a better future for them and their families, and it’s the beginning of positive changes ahead.”

    The Nichiha win comes on the heels of a recent victory Brooks led organizing Sherwin-Williams in Birmingham, Alabama, a campaign he began simultaneously with the Nichiha campaign and another still in the works at Trojan Battery in Stonecrest, Georgia. The M.O.R.E. Work Investment Fund has supported these organizing efforts.

    “I’m excited about the future of our union and the futures of these workers who are joining us as Boilermaker brothers and sisters,” Brooks said. “This organizing work makes me proud to be a union Boilermaker. These are more hard-working Americans who will have the voice on the job they deserve.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Boilermakers win Nichiha vote to unionize

    Source: US International Brotherhood of Boilermakers

    Ultimately, Nichiha workers’ unity and determination made this win possible. It’s a milestone that will shape a better future for them and their families, and it’s the beginning of positive changes ahead.

    Carlos Brooks, Southeast Area Organizer

    Over the weekend, workers at Nichiha in Macon, Georgia, voted in favor of unionizing with the Boilermakers union. More than 250 workers turned out for the vote, with 55% voting “yes” for the union. Nichiha manufactures fiber cement siding panels that are primarily used in residential construction.

    Southeast Area Organizer Carlos Brooks led organizing efforts, which began several months ago. Among his organizing tactics, he used texting and social media campaigns, as well as fliers and other visual material. Most importantly, Brooks and others maintained a Boilermaker presence at the Nichiha facility to talk with workers and answer questions.

    “This was a highly vocal campaign,” Brooks said. “I spent significant time at the gates and responding to employees’ concerns via text messages.”

    He said that throughout the campaign workers raised serious concerns about their work environment, including promised raises that were never delivered, unsafe and extremely hot working conditions, unfair promotion practices and more. Nichiha’s attempts to discredit the Boilermakers union failed.

    “The success of this campaign was led by Brother Brooks and assisted by Erica Stewart (Diversity Organizer and Recruiting Coordinator, M.O.R.E. WIF),” said Don Hamric, Executive Director-ISO/Director of Research and Collective Bargaining. “They used their years of experience as union leaders to listen to the employees’ grievances and offered suggestions on how to combat those grievances.”

    Several Boilermakers from Brooks’ home local, L-D23 (Clinchfield, Georgia), also assisted with the campaign: Retiree Milton Taylor, Secretary-Treasurer Edwin Allen, Jr. and Trustee Chairman Riccardo Askew.

    “Ultimately, Nichiha workers’ unity and determination made this win possible,” Brooks said. “It’s a milestone that will shape a better future for them and their families, and it’s the beginning of positive changes ahead.”

    The Nichiha win comes on the heels of a recent victory Brooks led organizing Sherwin-Williams in Birmingham, Alabama, a campaign he began simultaneously with the Nichiha campaign and another still in the works at Trojan Battery in Stonecrest, Georgia. The M.O.R.E. Work Investment Fund has supported these organizing efforts.

    “I’m excited about the future of our union and the futures of these workers who are joining us as Boilermaker brothers and sisters,” Brooks said. “This organizing work makes me proud to be a union Boilermaker. These are more hard-working Americans who will have the voice on the job they deserve.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Boilermakers win Nichiha vote to unionize

    Source: US International Brotherhood of Boilermakers

    Ultimately, Nichiha workers’ unity and determination made this win possible. It’s a milestone that will shape a better future for them and their families, and it’s the beginning of positive changes ahead.

    Carlos Brooks, Southeast Area Organizer

    Over the weekend, workers at Nichiha in Macon, Georgia, voted in favor of unionizing with the Boilermakers union. More than 250 workers turned out for the vote, with 55% voting “yes” for the union. Nichiha manufactures fiber cement siding panels that are primarily used in residential construction.

    Southeast Area Organizer Carlos Brooks led organizing efforts, which began several months ago. Among his organizing tactics, he used texting and social media campaigns, as well as fliers and other visual material. Most importantly, Brooks and others maintained a Boilermaker presence at the Nichiha facility to talk with workers and answer questions.

    “This was a highly vocal campaign,” Brooks said. “I spent significant time at the gates and responding to employees’ concerns via text messages.”

    He said that throughout the campaign workers raised serious concerns about their work environment, including promised raises that were never delivered, unsafe and extremely hot working conditions, unfair promotion practices and more. Nichiha’s attempts to discredit the Boilermakers union failed.

    “The success of this campaign was led by Brother Brooks and assisted by Erica Stewart (Diversity Organizer and Recruiting Coordinator, M.O.R.E. WIF),” said Don Hamric, Executive Director-ISO/Director of Research and Collective Bargaining. “They used their years of experience as union leaders to listen to the employees’ grievances and offered suggestions on how to combat those grievances.”

    Several Boilermakers from Brooks’ home local, L-D23 (Clinchfield, Georgia), also assisted with the campaign: Retiree Milton Taylor, Secretary-Treasurer Edwin Allen, Jr. and Trustee Chairman Riccardo Askew.

    “Ultimately, Nichiha workers’ unity and determination made this win possible,” Brooks said. “It’s a milestone that will shape a better future for them and their families, and it’s the beginning of positive changes ahead.”

    The Nichiha win comes on the heels of a recent victory Brooks led organizing Sherwin-Williams in Birmingham, Alabama, a campaign he began simultaneously with the Nichiha campaign and another still in the works at Trojan Battery in Stonecrest, Georgia. The M.O.R.E. Work Investment Fund has supported these organizing efforts.

    “I’m excited about the future of our union and the futures of these workers who are joining us as Boilermaker brothers and sisters,” Brooks said. “This organizing work makes me proud to be a union Boilermaker. These are more hard-working Americans who will have the voice on the job they deserve.”

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Marking a Milestone: 20th Anniversary of the Amendment to the Convention on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

    Twenty years ago, the adoption of the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (A/CPPNM) marked the start of a new era in international efforts to counter the risk of nuclear security threats.

    The Convention and its Amendment are the only internationally legally binding undertakings in the area of physical protection of nuclear material and of nuclear facilities used for peaceful purposes. They provide a robust international legal framework as a foundation for effective nuclear security.

    On the occasion of the anniversary, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi emphasized in his message that “it is in everyone’s interest that all States join and implement both. We need to do everything possible against current and emerging threats, and we need to lay a solid foundation for the many communities embracing reliable, low carbon nuclear energy in more and more countries.”

    The Amendment came into force in May 2016 and extended the scope of the original treaty to cover physical protection of nuclear facilities and nuclear material used for peaceful purposes in domestic use, storage and transport. It also further criminalizes offences related to illicit trafficking and sabotage of nuclear material or nuclear facilities, and provides for strengthened international cooperation in light of the expanded scope, such as assistance and information sharing in the event of sabotage.

    The first Conference of the Parties to the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Materials was held at the IAEA’s headquarters in Vienna, Austria from 28 March to 1 April 2022. The second such Conference is scheduled to be held in Vienna in April 2027.

    “As we prepare for the second conference on the Amendment to the CPPNM, the IAEA will continue its support. We will do this through new partnerships with key decision makers and stakeholders, new initiatives and tailored legislative and technical assistance,” Grossi said.

    The CPPNM currently has 165 Parties, of which 138 have also joined the Amendment. Most recently, Mongolia became the latest Party to the Amendment.

    Mongolia’s ratification of the A/CPPNM in April 2025 marked a strategic step in strengthening the national nuclear security framework and legal infrastructure. “This development reaffirms Mongolia’s strong commitment to the peaceful use of nuclear technology and to preventing nuclear and radiological threats both nationally and regionally. By joining the Amendment, Mongolia has expanded its obligations to protect nuclear material not only during international transport but also in domestic use and at nuclear facilities, in line with international standards,” said Gerelmaa Gombosuren, Acting Head of the Foreign Affairs Division in Mongolia’s Nuclear Energy Commission.

    “The country’s adherence was made possible through close cooperation with the IAEA, whose legal guidance, technical assistance, and capacity-building support have significantly enhanced our institutional preparedness. We remain committed to the universalization and effective implementation of the A/CPPNM and to contributing to global nuclear security efforts,” she added.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Security: Marking a Milestone: 20th Anniversary of the Amendment to the Convention on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency – IAEA

    Twenty years ago, the adoption of the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (A/CPPNM) marked the start of a new era in international efforts to counter the risk of nuclear security threats.

    The Convention and its Amendment are the only internationally legally binding undertakings in the area of physical protection of nuclear material and of nuclear facilities used for peaceful purposes. They provide a robust international legal framework as a foundation for effective nuclear security.

    On the occasion of the anniversary, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi emphasized in his message that “it is in everyone’s interest that all States join and implement both. We need to do everything possible against current and emerging threats, and we need to lay a solid foundation for the many communities embracing reliable, low carbon nuclear energy in more and more countries.”

    The Amendment came into force in May 2016 and extended the scope of the original treaty to cover physical protection of nuclear facilities and nuclear material used for peaceful purposes in domestic use, storage and transport. It also further criminalizes offences related to illicit trafficking and sabotage of nuclear material or nuclear facilities, and provides for strengthened international cooperation in light of the expanded scope, such as assistance and information sharing in the event of sabotage.

    The first Conference of the Parties to the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Materials was held at the IAEA’s headquarters in Vienna, Austria from 28 March to 1 April 2022. The second such Conference is scheduled to be held in Vienna in April 2027.

    “As we prepare for the second conference on the Amendment to the CPPNM, the IAEA will continue its support. We will do this through new partnerships with key decision makers and stakeholders, new initiatives and tailored legislative and technical assistance,” Grossi said.

    The CPPNM currently has 165 Parties, of which 138 have also joined the Amendment. Most recently, Mongolia became the latest Party to the Amendment.

    Mongolia’s ratification of the A/CPPNM in April 2025 marked a strategic step in strengthening the national nuclear security framework and legal infrastructure. “This development reaffirms Mongolia’s strong commitment to the peaceful use of nuclear technology and to preventing nuclear and radiological threats both nationally and regionally. By joining the Amendment, Mongolia has expanded its obligations to protect nuclear material not only during international transport but also in domestic use and at nuclear facilities, in line with international standards,” said Gerelmaa Gombosuren, Acting Head of the Foreign Affairs Division in Mongolia’s Nuclear Energy Commission.

    “The country’s adherence was made possible through close cooperation with the IAEA, whose legal guidance, technical assistance, and capacity-building support have significantly enhanced our institutional preparedness. We remain committed to the universalization and effective implementation of the A/CPPNM and to contributing to global nuclear security efforts,” she added.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: School lunches, the French way: It’s not just about nutrition, but togetherness and ‘bon appetit’

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Rachel Engler-Stringer, Professor, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan

    This spring, as part of a sabbatical project, I had the privilege of visiting school food programs and meeting with school food researchers in six cities in France, England and Scotland.

    I got to eat school lunches, visit central kitchens in two cities where meals are prepared for thousands of children, visit school kitchens and discuss school food with the countries’ leading experts.

    This visit intersects with my research with colleagues on promising food programs across Canada. This research offers insights for consideration as regions navigate the federal government’s first National School Food Program and National School Food Policy.

    Government announcements about the program and policy were followed by negotiations with the provinces and territories, all of which have since signed agreements for a portion of the funding.

    In most parts of Canada, officials are just beginning to plan for new approaches to school food (with a few exceptions especially in Atlantic Canada where school food programs have been transforming much more quickly).

    Based on my research about international food programs, here are four key things Canadians should pay attention to:

    1) In Canada we need to shift from thinking of school lunches as a safety net for kids living in poverty to thinking about them as benefiting the health and well-being of children and their families. In France, this shift in thinking is particularly clear.

    School lunches in France are about teaching children about food and culture and all kids are encouraged to eat together with an adult facilitator who teaches them about the components of the meal and creates a family-meal context at each table. By contrast, if you ask many parents in Canada what school meals are for, they will tell you they are for kids living in poverty to make sure they have food to eat at school.

    If Canada wants a national school food program that achieves the benefits of the best programs in the world in the areas of education, well-being and on the economy, we need to think of school meals as supporting young people to be the best students they can be.

    2) One important benefit of school food programs globally is to encourage picky eaters to try new foods due to the social pressure of all kids eating the same foods together. In three cities in France I visited, and one in England, school lunches look like home-cooked meals. One main dish with meat is served (and in England, a vegetarian alternative), and kids can choose if and how much of the side vegetables and fruit to take.

    In Canada, following a similar practice — one main and a vegetarian alternative when meat is served — might work well. But it’s also important that in developing a menu, the cultural diversity of Canadian school communities is reflected in the food on offer.

    In the other two locations in England and Scotland, kids choose from multiple main dishes — something that adds cost to the program and does less to encourage kids to try new foods, given one choice is always something basic like a cheese sandwich.

    Kids need to have some autonomy when it comes to eating, but school food programs should not be facilitating eating the same food every day. Nor should school food programs aspire to a model where broad choice is afforded from a large menu.

    3) With care, planning and sufficient resources, centralized kitchens can prepare thousands of servings of a main dish daily. The French central kitchens I visited prepare 6,000 to 10,000 servings a day of high-quality food following strict food safety protocols.

    I ate two simple yet delicious meals cooked in municipally owned central kitchens. In the three cities in France where I visited, they used central kitchens where main dishes were prepared and chilled to be delivered for heating at the school level. Central kitchens also delivered the salads and sides (like chopped veggies, bread, cheese and fruit) and dressings.

    In the small school kitchens, the salads were dressed, and the cheese and fruit were cut for service.

    The central kitchens were also used in at least one city to prepare food for daycares and for seniors who were home-bound — something to consider for Canadian cities.

    Centralizing kitchens can reduce costs and provide a way for high-quality food to be produced from basic ingredients without commercial kitchens in every school capable of preparing meals for hundreds of children at a time.

    4) When designed with requirements for purchasing foods from local farmers and other Canadian producers, school food programs can benefit the agricultural sector and multiply their benefits to communities beyond direct school food jobs. In France, for example, there are specific percentages to be purchased from local and sustainable sources. Percentage requirements for local and sustainable purchasing should be enacted now in Canada as its program establishes itself, perhaps beginning with 20 per cent and growing over time.

    I have many more reflections from my visits, both positive and negative, but the four I have discussed are important for Canada to learn from as it begins to design the National School Food Program to meet the needs of diverse communities from coast to coast to coast.

    Rachel Engler-Stringer receives funding from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada and received a University of Saskatchewan International Travel Award for program visits. She sits on the Steering Committee of the Coalition for Healthy School Food.

    ref. School lunches, the French way: It’s not just about nutrition, but togetherness and ‘bon appetit’ – https://theconversation.com/school-lunches-the-french-way-its-not-just-about-nutrition-but-togetherness-and-bon-appetit-259832

    MIL OSI

  • MIL-OSI Analysis: School lunches, the French way: It’s not just about nutrition, but togetherness and ‘bon appetit’

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Rachel Engler-Stringer, Professor, Department of Community Health and Epidemiology, University of Saskatchewan

    This spring, as part of a sabbatical project, I had the privilege of visiting school food programs and meeting with school food researchers in six cities in France, England and Scotland.

    I got to eat school lunches, visit central kitchens in two cities where meals are prepared for thousands of children, visit school kitchens and discuss school food with the countries’ leading experts.

    This visit intersects with my research with colleagues on promising food programs across Canada. This research offers insights for consideration as regions navigate the federal government’s first National School Food Program and National School Food Policy.

    Government announcements about the program and policy were followed by negotiations with the provinces and territories, all of which have since signed agreements for a portion of the funding.

    In most parts of Canada, officials are just beginning to plan for new approaches to school food (with a few exceptions especially in Atlantic Canada where school food programs have been transforming much more quickly).

    Based on my research about international food programs, here are four key things Canadians should pay attention to:

    1) In Canada we need to shift from thinking of school lunches as a safety net for kids living in poverty to thinking about them as benefiting the health and well-being of children and their families. In France, this shift in thinking is particularly clear.

    School lunches in France are about teaching children about food and culture and all kids are encouraged to eat together with an adult facilitator who teaches them about the components of the meal and creates a family-meal context at each table. By contrast, if you ask many parents in Canada what school meals are for, they will tell you they are for kids living in poverty to make sure they have food to eat at school.

    If Canada wants a national school food program that achieves the benefits of the best programs in the world in the areas of education, well-being and on the economy, we need to think of school meals as supporting young people to be the best students they can be.

    2) One important benefit of school food programs globally is to encourage picky eaters to try new foods due to the social pressure of all kids eating the same foods together. In three cities in France I visited, and one in England, school lunches look like home-cooked meals. One main dish with meat is served (and in England, a vegetarian alternative), and kids can choose if and how much of the side vegetables and fruit to take.

    In Canada, following a similar practice — one main and a vegetarian alternative when meat is served — might work well. But it’s also important that in developing a menu, the cultural diversity of Canadian school communities is reflected in the food on offer.

    In the other two locations in England and Scotland, kids choose from multiple main dishes — something that adds cost to the program and does less to encourage kids to try new foods, given one choice is always something basic like a cheese sandwich.

    Kids need to have some autonomy when it comes to eating, but school food programs should not be facilitating eating the same food every day. Nor should school food programs aspire to a model where broad choice is afforded from a large menu.

    3) With care, planning and sufficient resources, centralized kitchens can prepare thousands of servings of a main dish daily. The French central kitchens I visited prepare 6,000 to 10,000 servings a day of high-quality food following strict food safety protocols.

    I ate two simple yet delicious meals cooked in municipally owned central kitchens. In the three cities in France where I visited, they used central kitchens where main dishes were prepared and chilled to be delivered for heating at the school level. Central kitchens also delivered the salads and sides (like chopped veggies, bread, cheese and fruit) and dressings.

    In the small school kitchens, the salads were dressed, and the cheese and fruit were cut for service.

    The central kitchens were also used in at least one city to prepare food for daycares and for seniors who were home-bound — something to consider for Canadian cities.

    Centralizing kitchens can reduce costs and provide a way for high-quality food to be produced from basic ingredients without commercial kitchens in every school capable of preparing meals for hundreds of children at a time.

    4) When designed with requirements for purchasing foods from local farmers and other Canadian producers, school food programs can benefit the agricultural sector and multiply their benefits to communities beyond direct school food jobs. In France, for example, there are specific percentages to be purchased from local and sustainable sources. Percentage requirements for local and sustainable purchasing should be enacted now in Canada as its program establishes itself, perhaps beginning with 20 per cent and growing over time.

    I have many more reflections from my visits, both positive and negative, but the four I have discussed are important for Canada to learn from as it begins to design the National School Food Program to meet the needs of diverse communities from coast to coast to coast.

    Rachel Engler-Stringer receives funding from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Public Health Agency of Canada and received a University of Saskatchewan International Travel Award for program visits. She sits on the Steering Committee of the Coalition for Healthy School Food.

    ref. School lunches, the French way: It’s not just about nutrition, but togetherness and ‘bon appetit’ – https://theconversation.com/school-lunches-the-french-way-its-not-just-about-nutrition-but-togetherness-and-bon-appetit-259832

    MIL OSI Analysis

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Marking a Milestone: 20th Anniversary of the Amendment to the Convention on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) –

    Twenty years ago, the adoption of the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (A/CPPNM) marked the start of a new era in international efforts to counter the risk of nuclear security threats.

    The Convention and its Amendment are the only internationally legally binding undertakings in the area of physical protection of nuclear material and of nuclear facilities used for peaceful purposes. They provide a robust international legal framework as a foundation for effective nuclear security.

    On the occasion of the anniversary, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi emphasized in his message that “it is in everyone’s interest that all States join and implement both. We need to do everything possible against current and emerging threats, and we need to lay a solid foundation for the many communities embracing reliable, low carbon nuclear energy in more and more countries.”

    The Amendment came into force in May 2016 and extended the scope of the original treaty to cover physical protection of nuclear facilities and nuclear material used for peaceful purposes in domestic use, storage and transport. It also further criminalizes offences related to illicit trafficking and sabotage of nuclear material or nuclear facilities, and provides for strengthened international cooperation in light of the expanded scope, such as assistance and information sharing in the event of sabotage.

    The first Conference of the Parties to the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Materials was held at the IAEA’s headquarters in Vienna, Austria from 28 March to 1 April 2022. The second such Conference is scheduled to be held in Vienna in April 2027.

    “As we prepare for the second conference on the Amendment to the CPPNM, the IAEA will continue its support. We will do this through new partnerships with key decision makers and stakeholders, new initiatives and tailored legislative and technical assistance,” Grossi said.

    The CPPNM currently has 165 Parties, of which 138 have also joined the Amendment. Most recently, Mongolia became the latest Party to the Amendment.

    Mongolia’s ratification of the A/CPPNM in April 2025 marked a strategic step in strengthening the national nuclear security framework and legal infrastructure. “This development reaffirms Mongolia’s strong commitment to the peaceful use of nuclear technology and to preventing nuclear and radiological threats both nationally and regionally. By joining the Amendment, Mongolia has expanded its obligations to protect nuclear material not only during international transport but also in domestic use and at nuclear facilities, in line with international standards,” said Gerelmaa Gombosuren, Acting Head of the Foreign Affairs Division in Mongolia’s Nuclear Energy Commission.

    “The country’s adherence was made possible through close cooperation with the IAEA, whose legal guidance, technical assistance, and capacity-building support have significantly enhanced our institutional preparedness. We remain committed to the universalization and effective implementation of the A/CPPNM and to contributing to global nuclear security efforts,” she added.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI USA: King Asserts Role on Armed Services Committee to Support Maine Economy and Strengthen National Security

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), worked with his committee colleagues this week to secure strong investments in Maine’s economy and America’s defense posture through the Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). This legislation will support servicemembers and their families and boost the Maine economy through support for the hundreds of businesses that serve the military’s technological and manufacturing needs leading to a more prosperous Maine and a stronger national security for the United States.
    The legislation passed out of committee in a bipartisan 26-1 vote and represents the first step in bipartisan negotiations to pass a fiscal year budget for the armed forces and national defense interests. It includes several provisions that Senator King backed, including: support for veterans, an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer for Bath Iron Works (BIW), a comprehensive new approach to monitoring brain health, aggressive policies to strengthen America’s cybersecurity, provisions to address the security threats posed by artificial intelligence, and measures to prevent illegal drugs from entering the country.
    “For over six decades, Congress has taken a bipartisan approach to ensure that America’s military and defense forces have the training and equipment to carry out their missions, and protect our interests at home and abroad. This year, we are continuing that tradition in passing a defense bill out of Committee that will make our nation and state safer and stronger,” said Senator King. “As our global community faces some of its greatest challenges, the bill makes important investments in Maine people and businesses that are critical to the safety and security of our country.
    “There are many important provisions in this legislation – including support for troops and their families, investment in Maine research, and needed oversight of the Department of Defense,” continued Senator King. “All told, this year’s defense bill will make our country safer, strengthen our economy, and support the men and women who fight for our freedoms.”
    The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 includes King-backed provisions to:
    INVEST IN MAINE SHIPBUILDING AND INSTALLATIONS. 
    The FY26 NDAA authorizes $550 million for DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers that Bath Iron Works will build beyond the previously approved funding in the continuing resolution.

    This legislation also authorizes the funding for Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNSY) modernization efforts – including the final phase of funding for the Dry Dock extension that will allow PNSY to continue to maintain the Navy’s submarine fleet.
    The bill includes an effort co-sponsored by Senator King that empowers shipyards across the country to make their own hiring decisions based on the workforce needs of their property and not leave these determinations for military officials to make from a distance.

    PREVENT AND PROTECT BRAIN HEALTH. Included in this legislation is a report specifically requested by Senator King to protect servicemembers from blast exposure and address TBI through weapons sensor development led by a Maine business. Also included is a provision encouraging the DOD to maintain robust oversight and ensure timely implementation of suicide prevention recommendations, particularly those of the Suicide Prevention and Response Independent Review Committee.
    HELP ADDRESS HOUSING ALLOWANCE SHORTFALLS FOR SERVICEMEMBERS. The FY26 NDAA will require the DOD to publish how housing allowances are calculated, what housing types are covered, and to pilot a new calculation method based on rental costs by bedroom size. This is on the heels of last year’s Defense bill which increased Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) rates. Maine servicemembers including members of the Coast Guard will benefit.
    IMPROVE THE WARM HANDOFF. Included in this bill is a signature priority of Senator King’s that improves sharing of information between the Defense Department and State Veterans Agencies.  Maine Bureau of Veterans Services advocated for this reform that will impact all servicemembers and help address the proven high-risk period when servicemembers leave the military.  
    SUPPORT FOR UKRAINE. The FY26 NDAA reaffirms that it is the policy of the United States to assist Ukraine in maintaining a credible defense and deterrence capability and to bolster defense and security cooperation with Ukraine to build a Ukrainian military that is capable of defending Ukraine and deterring future aggression.
    ENHANCE DETERRENCE THROUGH CYBERSECURITY. The bill includes the King-led provision to require the DOD create a credible cyber deterrent strategy against cyberattacks by mid-2026.
    MODERNIZE OUR NUCLEAR DETERRENT. As Cochairman of the Subcommittee on Strategic Forces, Senator King is a Congressional leader working to ensure the bipartisan effort to provide oversight of strategic programs from the nuclear triad to missile defense. Sen King advocated to include important provisions addressing nuclear non-proliferation were included. The bill strengthens the nuclear triad and nuclear command and control including cyber protections and addressing concerns with artificial intelligence.  The bill also includes important oversight of the NNSA and nuclear modernization programs, and missile defense programs to help address cost and defense industrial base concerns.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: King Asserts Role on Armed Services Committee to Support Maine Economy and Strengthen National Security

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Angus King
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Angus King (I-ME), a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), worked with his committee colleagues this week to secure strong investments in Maine’s economy and America’s defense posture through the Fiscal Year 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). This legislation will support servicemembers and their families and boost the Maine economy through support for the hundreds of businesses that serve the military’s technological and manufacturing needs leading to a more prosperous Maine and a stronger national security for the United States.
    The legislation passed out of committee in a bipartisan 26-1 vote and represents the first step in bipartisan negotiations to pass a fiscal year budget for the armed forces and national defense interests. It includes several provisions that Senator King backed, including: support for veterans, an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer for Bath Iron Works (BIW), a comprehensive new approach to monitoring brain health, aggressive policies to strengthen America’s cybersecurity, provisions to address the security threats posed by artificial intelligence, and measures to prevent illegal drugs from entering the country.
    “For over six decades, Congress has taken a bipartisan approach to ensure that America’s military and defense forces have the training and equipment to carry out their missions, and protect our interests at home and abroad. This year, we are continuing that tradition in passing a defense bill out of Committee that will make our nation and state safer and stronger,” said Senator King. “As our global community faces some of its greatest challenges, the bill makes important investments in Maine people and businesses that are critical to the safety and security of our country.
    “There are many important provisions in this legislation – including support for troops and their families, investment in Maine research, and needed oversight of the Department of Defense,” continued Senator King. “All told, this year’s defense bill will make our country safer, strengthen our economy, and support the men and women who fight for our freedoms.”
    The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 includes King-backed provisions to:
    INVEST IN MAINE SHIPBUILDING AND INSTALLATIONS. 
    The FY26 NDAA authorizes $550 million for DDG-51 Arleigh Burke-class destroyers that Bath Iron Works will build beyond the previously approved funding in the continuing resolution.

    This legislation also authorizes the funding for Portsmouth Naval Shipyard (PNSY) modernization efforts – including the final phase of funding for the Dry Dock extension that will allow PNSY to continue to maintain the Navy’s submarine fleet.
    The bill includes an effort co-sponsored by Senator King that empowers shipyards across the country to make their own hiring decisions based on the workforce needs of their property and not leave these determinations for military officials to make from a distance.

    PREVENT AND PROTECT BRAIN HEALTH. Included in this legislation is a report specifically requested by Senator King to protect servicemembers from blast exposure and address TBI through weapons sensor development led by a Maine business. Also included is a provision encouraging the DOD to maintain robust oversight and ensure timely implementation of suicide prevention recommendations, particularly those of the Suicide Prevention and Response Independent Review Committee.
    HELP ADDRESS HOUSING ALLOWANCE SHORTFALLS FOR SERVICEMEMBERS. The FY26 NDAA will require the DOD to publish how housing allowances are calculated, what housing types are covered, and to pilot a new calculation method based on rental costs by bedroom size. This is on the heels of last year’s Defense bill which increased Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) rates. Maine servicemembers including members of the Coast Guard will benefit.
    IMPROVE THE WARM HANDOFF. Included in this bill is a signature priority of Senator King’s that improves sharing of information between the Defense Department and State Veterans Agencies.  Maine Bureau of Veterans Services advocated for this reform that will impact all servicemembers and help address the proven high-risk period when servicemembers leave the military.  
    SUPPORT FOR UKRAINE. The FY26 NDAA reaffirms that it is the policy of the United States to assist Ukraine in maintaining a credible defense and deterrence capability and to bolster defense and security cooperation with Ukraine to build a Ukrainian military that is capable of defending Ukraine and deterring future aggression.
    ENHANCE DETERRENCE THROUGH CYBERSECURITY. The bill includes the King-led provision to require the DOD create a credible cyber deterrent strategy against cyberattacks by mid-2026.
    MODERNIZE OUR NUCLEAR DETERRENT. As Cochairman of the Subcommittee on Strategic Forces, Senator King is a Congressional leader working to ensure the bipartisan effort to provide oversight of strategic programs from the nuclear triad to missile defense. Sen King advocated to include important provisions addressing nuclear non-proliferation were included. The bill strengthens the nuclear triad and nuclear command and control including cyber protections and addressing concerns with artificial intelligence.  The bill also includes important oversight of the NNSA and nuclear modernization programs, and missile defense programs to help address cost and defense industrial base concerns.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Xizang sees steady tourism growth in first half

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    LHASA, July 14 (Xinhua) — Southwest China’s Xijiang Autonomous Region received 31.28 million tourists in the first half of 2025, up 11.67 percent year on year, local authorities said Monday.

    According to the Department of Culture and Tourism of the autonomous region, this figure is 41.71 percent of the region’s annual plan.

    At the same time, the domestic tourist flow reached 31.09 million people, which is 11.57 percent more year-on-year, and the number of foreign tourists increased by 31.2 percent to 196.4 thousand people.

    Xijiang’s tourism revenue during the reporting period amounted to 31.55 billion yuan (about 4.4 billion U.S. dollars), showing a year-on-year increase of 10.18 percent.

    The department added that the region’s cultural industry also showed significant growth in the first half of the year, with the total value of its output exceeding 7.72 billion yuan, up 21.2 percent year-on-year. More than 53,000 cultural events were held in the region. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: China’s express delivery sector maintains growth momentum in H1 2025

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, July 14 (Xinhua) — China’s express delivery market showed stable growth in the first half of 2025, and the market scale remained high, the State Post Administration of China said Monday.

    China’s express delivery sector revenue is expected to exceed 700 billion yuan (about 97.9 billion U.S. dollars) in January-June, up 8.5 percent year on year.

    As Zhu Li, a representative of the Development Research Center of the State Postal Administration of the People’s Republic of China, said at a press conference, the volume of processed items for the specified period is estimated to exceed 95 billion, which is 19 percent more year-on-year.

    In June, the express delivery development index was 454.3, an increase of 4.7 percent year-on-year.

    Zhu Li noted that China’s express delivery sector has seen steady growth in the first half of this year, fully meeting the delivery needs of streaming sales, the holiday economy and trade-in of consumer goods.

    The sector also deeply identified the potential demand for delivery services in the fields of cultural tourism and sports competitions, and promoted the continuous unleashing of the potential of online consumption, Zhu Li pointed out.

    According to her, in the second half of the year, the sector is expected to continue to unleash its growth momentum, deepen industry coordination, and expand the range of services provided. –0–

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: UPDATE – Sandoz Inc. Issues Voluntary Nationwide Recall Expansion of One Additional Lot of Cefazolin for Injection Due to Product Mislabeling

    Source: US Department of Health and Human Services – 3

    Summary

    Company Announcement Date:
    July 14, 2025
    FDA Publish Date:
    July 14, 2025
    Reason for Announcement:

    Recall Reason Description
    Vials incorrectly labelled as Penicillin G Potassium for Injection contain Cefazolin for Injection

    Company Name:
    Sandoz, Inc.
    Brand Name:

    Brand Name(s)
    Sandoz

    Product Description:

    Product Description
    Cefazolin for Injection, USP, 1 gm vial

    Company Announcement
    “This is an update to the Company Statement issued on June 27, 2025, to include one additional lot.”
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – Princeton, NJ – July 14, 2025 – Sandoz, Inc. (“Sandoz”) is initiating a voluntary nationwide recall expansion of one additional lot of Cefazolin for Injection, USP, 1 gram per vial. The lot is being recalled due to a customer complaint indicating that four (4) vials incorrectly labelled as Penicillin G Potassium for Injection, USP, 20 million Units were included in cartons (25 vials per carton) of Cefazolin for Injection, USP 1 gram per vial product. Sandoz has confirmed that the vials incorrectly labelled as Penicillin G Potassium for Injection contain Cefazolin for Injection, USP, 1 gram per vial.
    Risk Statement: There is a reasonable probability that the inadvertent administration of cefazolin injection following dosing recommendation of penicillin G potassium injection due to mislabeling may pose serious and potentially life-threatening adverse health consequences, including lack of efficacy leading to less than optimal treatment of severe infections, antibiotic resistance, adverse reactions, severe allergic reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis), drug interactions, and delayed recovery.
    To date, Sandoz has not received any reports of adverse events or injuries related to the product mislabeling. Sandoz has received a complaint of administration of the incorrectly labelled product to a patient.
    Lots impacted by the voluntary recall and its expansion:

    Product Name 

    Vial NDC 

    Carton NDC 

    Lot Number 

    Expiration Date 

    Manufacturer 

    Distributor 

    Cefazolin for Injection, USP(25 by 1g vials)

    0781-3451-70

    0781-3451-96

    PG4360

    2027-NOV

    Sandoz GmbH

    Sandoz Inc

    Penicillin G Potassium for Injection, USP

    0781-6136-94

    N/A

    PG4360

    2027-NOV

    Sandoz GmbH

    Sandoz Inc

    Cefazolin for Injection, USP(25 by 1g vials)

    0781-3451-70

    0781-3451-96

    PG4362

    2027-NOV

    Sandoz GmbH

    Sandoz Inc

    Penicillin G Potassium for Injection, USP

    0781-6136-94

    N/A

    PG4362

    2027-NOV

    Sandoz GmbH

    Sandoz Inc

    Cefazolin for Injection USP is used for the treatment of infections caused by certain bacteria in many different parts of the body including the treatment of pneumonia. Cefazolin for Injection USP can also be used to prevent infections, before and after surgery. Antibacterial drugs like Cefazolin for Injection USP treat only bacterial infections. They do not treat viral infections. Cefazolin for Injection USP is indicated for adult, elderly, pediatric patients, including newborn term infants.
    Penicillin G Potassium for Injection is indicated in the treatment of certain serious infections including septicemia, skin and wound infections. It is also approved for the treatment of diphtheria, community-acquired pneumonia, peritonitis, meningitis/brain abscesses, osteomyelitis, infections of the genital tract, anthrax, tetanus, gas gangrene, listeriosis, pasteurellosis, rat bite fever, fusospirochetes, actinomycosis, complications in gonorrhea and syphilis and Lyme. To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain effectiveness of Penicillin G Potassium for Injection, USP and other antibacterial drugs, Penicillin G Potassium for Injection, USP should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria. Penicillin G Potassium for Injection is indicated for use in adults, adolescents, children, pediatric, newborn infants and preterm infants.
    Although both Cefazolin and Penicillin G Potassium belong to the beta-lactam group of antibiotics, they are indicated for different types of infections, and the spectrum of susceptible organisms also differs. Additionally, while the patient populations overlap, each medicine has specific on-label distinct groups, and the dosing regimens may differ, as well.
    Sandoz is notifying its customers by letter and is arranging for return of the recalled product. The product being recalled was shipped to select wholesalers for further distribution nationwide. Healthcare providers and customers who have this product should immediately stop use of this lot only and contact Sedgwick, the Sandoz Reverse Distributor, directly by phone at (844) 265-7409 or by email at Sandoz5615@sedgwick.com.
    For questions about the recall process, please call Sedgwick at (844) 265-7409 between the hours of 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday – Friday (EST).
    Please report any adverse reactions by calling Sandoz at (800) 525-8747. Customer service agents are available from 8:30 AM to 5:00 PM (EST), Monday-Friday, except on national holidays.
    Adverse reactions or quality problems experienced with the use of this product may be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting program either online, by regular mail, or by fax.

    This recall is being conducted with the knowledge of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
    DISCLAIMERThis Media Release contains forward-looking statements, which offer no guarantee with regard to future performance. These statements are made on the basis of management’s views and assumptions regarding future events and business performance at the time the statements are made. They are subject to risks and uncertainties including, but not confined to, future global economic conditions, exchange rates, legal provisions, market conditions, activities by competitors and other factors outside of the control of Sandoz. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual outcomes may vary materially from those forecasted or expected. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement, and Sandoz undertakes no obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements, except as required by law.
    ABOUT SANDOZSandoz (SIX: SDZ; OTCQX: SDZNY) is the global leader in generic and biosimilar medicines, with a growth strategy driven by its Purpose: pioneering access for patients. More than 20,000 people of 100 nationalities work together to ensure 900 million patient treatments are provided by Sandoz, generating substantial global healthcare savings and an even larger social impact. Its leading portfolio of approximately 1,300 products addresses diseases from the common cold to cancer. Headquartered in Basel, Switzerland, Sandoz traces its heritage back to 1886. Its history of breakthroughs includes Calcium Sandoz in 1929, the world’s first oral penicillin in 1951, and the world’s first biosimilar in 2006. In 2024, Sandoz recorded net sales of USD 10.4 billion.
    Link to Original Press Release

    Company Contact Information

    Media:
    Jeanne LaCour, Vicki Crafton
    1-609-955-2339, 1-201-213-6338

    Product Photos

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Marking a Milestone: 20th Anniversary of the Amendment to the Convention on Physical Protection of Nuclear Material

    Source: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)

    Twenty years ago, the adoption of the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (A/CPPNM) marked the start of a new era in international efforts to counter the risk of nuclear security threats.

    The Convention and its Amendment are the only internationally legally binding undertakings in the area of physical protection of nuclear material and of nuclear facilities used for peaceful purposes. They provide a robust international legal framework as a foundation for effective nuclear security.

    On the occasion of the anniversary, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi emphasized in his message that “it is in everyone’s interest that all States join and implement both. We need to do everything possible against current and emerging threats, and we need to lay a solid foundation for the many communities embracing reliable, low carbon nuclear energy in more and more countries.”

    The Amendment came into force in May 2016 and extended the scope of the original treaty to cover physical protection of nuclear facilities and nuclear material used for peaceful purposes in domestic use, storage and transport. It also further criminalizes offences related to illicit trafficking and sabotage of nuclear material or nuclear facilities, and provides for strengthened international cooperation in light of the expanded scope, such as assistance and information sharing in the event of sabotage.

    The first Conference of the Parties to the Amendment to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Materials was held at the IAEA’s headquarters in Vienna, Austria from 28 March to 1 April 2022. The second such Conference is scheduled to be held in Vienna in April 2027.

    “As we prepare for the second conference on the Amendment to the CPPNM, the IAEA will continue its support. We will do this through new partnerships with key decision makers and stakeholders, new initiatives and tailored legislative and technical assistance,” Grossi said.

    The CPPNM currently has 165 Parties, of which 138 have also joined the Amendment. Most recently, Mongolia became the latest Party to the Amendment.

    Mongolia’s ratification of the A/CPPNM in April 2025 marked a strategic step in strengthening the national nuclear security framework and legal infrastructure. “This development reaffirms Mongolia’s strong commitment to the peaceful use of nuclear technology and to preventing nuclear and radiological threats both nationally and regionally. By joining the Amendment, Mongolia has expanded its obligations to protect nuclear material not only during international transport but also in domestic use and at nuclear facilities, in line with international standards,” said Gerelmaa Gombosuren, Acting Head of the Foreign Affairs Division in Mongolia’s Nuclear Energy Commission.

    “The country’s adherence was made possible through close cooperation with the IAEA, whose legal guidance, technical assistance, and capacity-building support have significantly enhanced our institutional preparedness. We remain committed to the universalization and effective implementation of the A/CPPNM and to contributing to global nuclear security efforts,” she added.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EU – Central America Association Council, 14 July 2025 – Joint Communiqué

    Source: Council of the European Union

    The European Union and the six Central American countries of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama met in Brussels on 14 July 2025 for an historical first EU-Central America Association Council in the framework of the Association Agreement between Central America and the EU.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EU – Central America Association Council, 14 July 2025 – Joint Communiqué

    Source: Council of the European Union

    The European Union and the six Central American countries of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and Panama met in Brussels on 14 July 2025 for an historical first EU-Central America Association Council in the framework of the Association Agreement between Central America and the EU.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Co-leader calls for climate resilience to be put on a statutory footing

    Source: Green Party of England and Wales

    Reacting to the Met Office’s State of the Climate Report, published today, co-leader of the Green Party, Adrian Ramsay MP, has called on the Prime Minister to put climate resilience on a statutory footing. He said:

    “England is facing its driest start to a year in my lifetime. Extreme weather is becoming the norm, and we are nowhere near prepared to protect our citizens. Our climate is fuelling extreme weather, and that is having direct and urgent consequences in the here and now.

    He continued: ”We had the warmest spring on record, and we are in the middle of this summer’s third heatwave. The last three years have been among the top five warmest on record. The Government has not adequately prepared our infrastructure to protect our citizens.”  

    ”The Government must outline the steps they are taking to prepare for the increasing threat of extreme temperatures. This is not just about this summer, it’s about how we adapt as the climate crisis continues to escalate.”

    “We need to safeguard the public from this rising climate threat. That is why the Prime Minister must put climate resilience on a statutory footing, requiring local councils and major infrastructure providers to carry out climate risk assessments for all projects.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Secretary-General’s press conference on the launch of the Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025 [as delivered]

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    Dear members of the media.

    Today, we launch the Sustainable Development Goals Report 2025. 

    Under-Secretary-General Li will go through the details. 

    But allow me to kick things off.

    We are now ten years into our collective journey toward the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

    The report is a snapshot of where we stand today.

    Since 2015, millions more people have gained access to electricity, clean cooking, and the internet.

    Social protection now reaches over half the world’s population — a significant increase from just a decade ago.

    Access to education has continued to increase and more girls are staying in school.

    Child marriage is declining.

    Renewable energy capacity is growing, with developing countries leading the way.

    And women’s representation is rising — across governments, businesses and societies.

    These gains show that investments in development and inclusion yield results.
    But let’s be clear: we are not where we need to be.

    Only 35 percent of SDG targets are on track or making moderate progress.

    Nearly half are moving too slowly.

    And 18 percent are going in reverse.

    We are in a global development emergency.

    An emergency measured in the over 800 million people still living in extreme poverty.

    In intensifying climate impacts.

    And in relentless debt service, draining the resources that countries need to invest in their people.

    We must also recognize the deep linkages between under-development and conflicts.

    That’s why we must keep working for peace in the Middle East.

    We need an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, the immediate release of all hostages, and unimpeded humanitarian access as a first step to achieve the two-State solution.

    We need the ceasefire between Iran and Israel to hold.

    We need a just and lasting peace in Ukraine based on the UN Charter, international law and UN resolutions. 

    We need an end to the horror and bloodshed in Sudan.

    From the DRC to Somalia, from the Sahel to Myanmar, we know that sustainable peace requires sustainable development.

    In the face of these challenges, the report we are launching today points the way to progress.
    Transformational pathways — in food, energy, digital access, education, jobs, and climate — are our roadmap.

    Progress in one area can multiply progress across all of them.

    But we must move faster, and we must move together.

    That means advancing affordable, quality healthcare for all.

    Investing in women and girls as a central driver of progress.

    Focusing on quality education and creating decent jobs and economic opportunities that leave no one behind.

    Closing the digital divide and ensuring that technologies like artificial intelligence are used responsibly and inclusively.

    And it means recognizing a fundamental fact.

    Progress is impossible without unlocking financing at scale.

    The recent Sevilla Commitment reflected a commitment to get the engine of development revving again.

    Through reform of the international financial architecture, real action on debt relief, and tripling the lending capacity of multilateral development banks so countries can better access capital at scale and at a reasonable cost.

    We have more opportunities to drive these priorities forward — from the High-Level Political Forum, to the Second Food Systems Stocktake Summit, to the World Social Summit, and more.

    We must maximize these moments for real commitments — and real delivery.

    Today’s report shows that the Sustainable Development Goals are still within reach.

    But only if we act — with urgency, unity, and unwavering resolve.

    It’s a pleasure to be with you again and I will give the floor to my dear colleague Li.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Klobuchar Urges President Trump to Support Efforts to Bring Abducted Ukrainian Children Home

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Minnesota Amy Klobuchar
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) released the following statement:
    “I hope President Trump will be announcing continued strong support for Ukraine this week in concert with our allies. I also urge him to make a clear commitment to finding and bringing home to Ukraine the thousands of Ukrainian children who have been abducted and forcibly deported by Russia,” said Klobuchar. “The United States should continue to support Ukraine’s determined work to track the missing and get these kids home. One way we can do that is by continuing the State Department funding of the work being done to track the stolen children.”
    Last month, Senators Klobuchar and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) introduced bipartisan legislation to enhance U.S. support for Ukraine’s efforts to investigate and track the nearly 20,000 Ukrainian children who have been abducted during Putin’s brutal invasion, assist with the rehabilitation and reintegration of children who are returned, and provide justice and accountability for perpetrators of these abductions. As of today, Ukraine and its partners have only managed to return 1,399 abducted children, according to Ukraine’s figures. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Klobuchar Urges President Trump to Support Efforts to Bring Abducted Ukrainian Children Home

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Minnesota Amy Klobuchar
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) released the following statement:
    “I hope President Trump will be announcing continued strong support for Ukraine this week in concert with our allies. I also urge him to make a clear commitment to finding and bringing home to Ukraine the thousands of Ukrainian children who have been abducted and forcibly deported by Russia,” said Klobuchar. “The United States should continue to support Ukraine’s determined work to track the missing and get these kids home. One way we can do that is by continuing the State Department funding of the work being done to track the stolen children.”
    Last month, Senators Klobuchar and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) introduced bipartisan legislation to enhance U.S. support for Ukraine’s efforts to investigate and track the nearly 20,000 Ukrainian children who have been abducted during Putin’s brutal invasion, assist with the rehabilitation and reintegration of children who are returned, and provide justice and accountability for perpetrators of these abductions. As of today, Ukraine and its partners have only managed to return 1,399 abducted children, according to Ukraine’s figures. 

    MIL OSI USA News