Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – European action plan on dementia – E-001905/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001905/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Hilde Vautmans (Renew)

    According to WHO estimates, dementia will become the third most common cause of mortality in Europe next year. However, the mission letter from Commission President von der Leyen does not mention dementia. Beyond the impact on patients and their families and friends, we must also consider the significant societal cost of inaction.

    • 1.In light of this, is there a commitment to developing a European action plan on dementia?
    • 2.How will the Commission ensure that this action plan addresses the full spectrum of dementia, including prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and care?
    • 3.What steps does the Commission plan to take to coordinate efforts with national governments and motivate Member States to develop and implement their national dementia strategies?

    Submitted: 1.10.2024

    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Greece is failing to meet its animal welfare obligations – E-001907/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001907/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Matthias Ecke (S&D)

    Greece is failing to meet its obligations under Regulation (EU) No 576/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 on the non-commercial movement of pet animals.

    The animal welfare association Tierschutzinitiative ohne Grenzen e.V. imports cats and dogs from Greece to Germany; it has always had a licence to do so. That licence has now been withdrawn by a court because the association did not use the TRACES system when importing pet animals into Germany. According to that association and other animal welfare organisations (such as Tierschutzverein Südkreta e.V.[1] and Tiere in Not Griechenland e.V.[2]), Greece systematically refuses to provide the necessary data on the use of TRACES.

    Consequently, the animal welfare association is being prevented from fulfilling its purpose.

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of any other complaints from animal welfare organisations in the EU that Greece is failing to meet the obligations stemming from European animal welfare regulations, in particular with regard to the non-commercial movement of pet animals?
    • 2.How does the Commission view Greece’s inadequate implementation of animal welfare obligations, in particular with regard to the transport of animals involving the TRACES system?
    • 3.How does the Commission intend to ensure that Greece provides information in future, in particular since systematic refusal to provide animal transport data is a breach of EU law?

    Submitted: 1.10.2024

    • [1] https://tsv-suedkreta.de/aktueller-hinweis/
    • [2] https://www.tiere-in-not-griechenland.de/
    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Concern regarding the judicial reform launched by the outgoing President of Mexico – E-001790/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001790/2024
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Jorge Martín Frías (PfE)

    Mexico’s President López Obrador recently managed to push through a controversial judicial reform that is provoking street protests because of the attack on the rule of law and on the separation of powers in the country that this reform entails.

    The reform constitutes a serious attack on the independence of Mexico’s judiciary, as it seeks to centralise power and reduce existing balances in order to have greater government control over the judiciary and limit the autonomy of judges.

    The new proposal for the election of judges that is being enacted contravenes fundamental democratic standards by including a direct selection process for judges and lowering the criteria required for appointment as a judge, seriously casting doubt on legal certainty in the country and the independence of judges.

    In light of the above:

    • 1.What is the opinion of the Vice-President / High Representative regarding the proposal for judicial reform put forward by López Obrador?
    • 2.Does the Vice-President / High Representative consider this reform to be a further attack on the separation of powers and on the rule of law in Mexico?
    • 3.Does the Vice-President / High Representative believe that the Mexican leaders of the MORENA party, such as López Obrador or Claudia Sheinbaum, may be taking a dangerously anti-democratic path?

    Submitted: 23.9.2024

    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – Exchange of Views on 14 October with EU-OSHA, ELA, Cedefop, Eurofound and ETF – Committee on Employment and Social Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    Agency logos.PNG © European Union

    During its meeting on 14 October, EMPL will hold an exchange of views with the Directors of EU-OSHA, ELA, Cedefop, Eurofound and ETF.

    William Cockburn (EU-OSHA), Cosmin Boiangiu (ELA), Jürgen Siebel (Cedefop), Ivailo Kalfin (Eurofound) and Pilvi Torsti (ETF) are going to give Members a snapshot of their respective Agencies’ main fields of expertise, focusing on current and planned work on important issues such as digitalisation in the world of work, just transition, skills recognition and portability, labour mobility and labour market shortages or housing, as well as ways of enhancing cooperation with the Committee in view of the start of the new mandate.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Italian Government’s moves against ‘gender ideology’ and respect for EU fundamental rights – E-001724/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001724/2024/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Carolina Morace (The Left), Gaetano Pedulla’ (The Left), Danilo Della Valle (The Left), Mario Furore (The Left), Pasquale Tridico (The Left), Giuseppe Antoci (The Left), Marc Angel (S&D), Kim Van Sparrentak (Verts/ALE)

    Recently, the Culture Committee of the Italian Chamber of Deputies adopted a resolution (7-00203) binding the government to lay down national guidelines that would stop the school curriculum from being ‘hijacked to unilaterally and uncritically champion behaviours rooted in “gender ideology” among young people’.

    Similarly, in May 2024, a representative of the ruling majority tabled a bill (C1885) to introduce an outright ban on the teaching of so-called ‘gender theories’ in the education system.

    These developments are fuelling concerns about respect for the fundamental rights enshrined in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, in particular Article 21, which outlaws discrimination on the grounds of sexual orientation, among other forms.

    In the light of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission believe that Italy’s recent moves are compatible with the principles of non-discrimination and gender equality championed by the EU?
    • 2.What can the Commission do to prevent potential violations of the rights of LGBTQ+ people in education in Italy?
    • 3.What measures could it adopt to make sure that Italy honours its human rights and gender equality commitments, particularly within education?

    Submitted: 16.9.2024

    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Use of deep fakes to defame people standing for public office – E-001917/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001917/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dan-Ştefan Motreanu (PPE)

    The Latvian Parliament recently adopted amendments to the Criminal Code under which the use of deep fake technologies to defame people standing for public office will be punishable with up to five years in prison.

    At present, there is no specific EU legislation directly regulating the use of deep-fake technologies for the purposes of defamation.

    Is the Commission considering introducing uniform rules at EU level to address this problem?

    Submitted: 2.10.2024

    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Protection of workers in extreme heat – E-001915/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001915/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dan-Ştefan Motreanu (PPE)

    The problem of workers being exposed to extreme temperatures is becoming increasingly serious in the EU as climate change increases the frequency and intensity of heat waves. In 2020, over 80 000 people fell ill and 67 died from working in extreme heat. This represents an alarming increase of 42 % in heat-related deaths at work in the EU since the turn of the century, affecting not only southern countries but also cooler climes such as Iceland, Ireland, Denmark and Norway.

    Although the Commission has published guidance for employers, many of these measures are not being respected, which is putting the lives of workers at risk, especially in insecure and unregulated sectors. In the absence of clear legislation on maximum working temperatures, workers continue to be exposed to significant risks, with tragic consequences.

    Does the Commission intend to bring forward a directive setting maximum temperature limits for outdoor work and protecting workers’ rights in terms of stopping work in conditions of extreme heat?

    Submitted: 2.10.2024

    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Are the EU’s instruments and mechanisms for agriculture fit for purpose in the face of protracted droughts? – E-001912/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001912/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dan-Ştefan Motreanu (PPE), Daniel Buda (PPE)

    High temperatures continue to devastate the EU. Destructive fires, heatwaves and severe droughts – worsened by reduced rainfall – are creating unprecedented challenges for agriculture.

    In Romania, 2.5 million hectares – specifically, 40 % of wheat, corn, rapeseed and sunflower crops – were compromised by drought in 2024[1]. The July drought report from the Joint Research Centre shows that Sicily lost 25 % of its agricultural production, with EUR 2.7 billion in drought damage[2], while parts of Spain imposed water restrictions of up to 80 % for crop irrigation and 50 % for livestock[3]. Greece faces devastating fires again, having lost 120 000 hectares[4] and up to 80 % of livestock in 2023[5]. Poland is also experiencing drought and in 2023, 290 000 farmers were affected[6].

    Such dramatic examples illustrate the new reality of agriculture. Eurostat indicates that Romania, Italy, Spain, Greece and Poland are among the top 10 Member States that produce 85 % of basic EU foodstuffs. Faced with consecutive dry years, the future of food security looks worrying.

    • 1.What information does the Commission have on the EU agricultural and economic impact of the decline in agricultural production and agri-food exports?
    • 2.What long-term measures will be implemented to help farmers, the agricultural sector, rural areas and trade to face these challenges?
    • 3.How will the Commission guarantee food security?

    Submitted: 2.10.2024

    • [1] https://www.zf.ro/companii/seceta-a-produs-pagube-de-1-5-1-8-miliarde-de-euro-ministrul-22466064.
    • [2] Joint Research Centre, JRC MARS Bulletin Vol. 32 No 7, ‘Crop monitoring in Europe – July 2024’, 22 July 2024.
    • [3] https://www.awe.international/article/1860170/catalonia-takes-measures-tackle-the-worst-drought-record.
    • [4] https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/8/25/all-my-fortune-was-there-fires-devastate-greek-livelihoods-and-wildlife.
    • [5] https://www.lemonde.fr/en/environment/article/2023/08/17/greece-s-volos-region-struggles-to-rebuild-after-devastating-fires_6095837_114.html.
    • [6] https://www.agroberichtenbuitenland.nl/actueel/nieuws/2024/06/02/poland-fewer-carrots-due-to-drought.
    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Delays and challenges in reaching the EU’s 2030 renewable hydrogen targets – E-001914/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001914/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dan-Ştefan Motreanu (PPE)

    The European Court of Auditors has warned that the EU is unlikely to meet its 2030 targets for the production and import of renewable hydrogen. These targets, set under the 2020 hydrogen strategy and the 2022 REPowerEU plan, foresee 10 million tonnes of renewable hydrogen being produced and a further 10 million tonnes being imported by 2030. Although EUR 18.8 billion has been allocated to hydrogen-related projects, the Court of Auditors considers these targets to be ‘unrealistic’ and based on political will rather than sound analysis.

    The Court also highlights the lack of sufficient demand, which has led to the postponement of many investment decisions, aggravating the ‘chicken and egg’ paradox, in which supply and demand depend on each other. It also stresses that the funding available is scattered across several programmes, making it complex for companies’ to access that funding.

    In view of these challenges, what steps will the Commission take to update the hydrogen strategy and ensure the 2030 targets are achieved?

    Submitted: 2.10.2024

    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The European Bauhaus initiative and equality among regions – E-001916/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001916/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Dan-Ştefan Motreanu (PPE)

    The New European Bauhaus (NEB) initiative, launched by the Commission in 2020, aims to incorporate the principles of sustainability, inclusiveness and aesthetics into the built environment in Europe. The NEB draws inspiration from the original Bauhaus movement, and seeks to create high-quality, accessible and sustainable living spaces for all European citizens. The initiative promotes an interdisciplinary approach, involving architects, designers, engineers and other stakeholders, to transforming the built environment and addressing the complex challenges of our times, such as climate change and social inequalities.

    The New European Bauhaus initiative has been the subject of public criticism for so far having mainly focused on the wealthier areas of the European Union.

    What does the Commission have to say to those criticisms?

    Submitted: 2.10.2024

    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Upsurge in violent incidents among young people – E-001929/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001929/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Eleonora Meleti (PPE)

    Europe is greatly saddened to see the serious problem of juvenile violence taking on increasingly worrying proportions. Every day, in every Member State, we see incidents of extreme violence where those involved – perpetrators and victims alike – are teenagers and young people who do not hold back from unthinkably brutal behaviour. Young people in Europe, in countries such as Greece, France, Germany, Sweden and many other Member States, seem in greater need of help and care than ever before.

    Knowing, as we all do, that we as adults should take responsibility for the young and act immediately to ensure their protection and healthy development, does the Commission:

    • 1.Intend to adopt measures to prevent, manage and combat this phenomenon and, if so, what are these measures?
    • 2.How does the Commission intend to protect and support juvenile victims and juvenile offenders?
    • 3.Does it intend to fund national bodies to create an action plan for providing information and preventing and managing juvenile violence through extensive educational programmes and related actions?

    Submitted: 2.10.2024

    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration – RC-B10-0072/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Siegfried Mureşan, Andrzej Halicki, Michael Gahler, Sebastião Bugalho, David McAllister, Željana Zovko, Nicolás Pascual De La Parte, Isabel Wiseler‑Lima, Antonio López‑Istúriz White, Wouter Beke, Krzysztof Brejza, Daniel Caspary, Jan Farský, Rasa Juknevičienė, Sandra Kalniete, Ondřej Kolář, Andrey Kovatchev, Andrius Kubilius, Miriam Lexmann, Vangelis Meimarakis, Ana Miguel Pedro, Davor Ivo Stier, Michał Szczerba, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Matej Tonin, Milan Zver, Ioan‑Rareş Bogdan, Daniel Buda, Gheorghe Falcă, Mircea‑Gheorghe Hava, Dan‑Ştefan Motreanu, Virgil‑Daniel Popescu, Adina Vălean, Loránt Vincze, Iuliu Winkler
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Sven Mikser, Thijs Reuten, Dan Nica, Victor Negrescu, Gheorghe Cârciu, Mihai Tudose, Adrian‑Dragoş Benea, Gabriela Firea, Maria Grapini, Claudiu Manda, Vasile Dîncu, Ştefan Muşoiu
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Adam Bielan, Mariusz Kamiński, Cristian Terheş, Alexandr Vondra, Roberts Zīle, Ivaylo Valchev, Carlo Fidanza, Rihards Kols, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Michał Dworczyk, Assita Kanko, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Maciej Wąsik, Veronika Vrecionová, Georgiana Teodorescu, Adrian‑George Axinia, Ondřej Krutílek, Tobiasz Bocheński, Alberico Gambino, Gheorghe Piperea, Aurelijus Veryga, Şerban‑Dimitrie Sturdza, Claudiu‑Richard Târziu, Charlie Weimers
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Dan Barna, Petras Auštrevičius, Helmut Brandstätter, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Bernard Guetta, Ľubica Karvašová, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Urmas Paet, Marie‑Agnes Strack‑Zimmermann, Eugen Tomac, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar, Dainius Žalimas
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Reinier Van Lanschot
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Jonas Sjöstedt
    on behalf of The Left Group

    European Parliament resolution on strengthening Moldova’s resilience against Russian interference ahead of the upcoming presidential elections and a constitutional referendum on EU integration

    (2024/2821(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on the Republic of Moldova,

     having regard to the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Moldova, of the other part[1], which includes a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area,

     having regard to the Republic of Moldova’s application for EU membership of 3 March 2022, and the European Council’s consequent granting of candidate country status on 23 June 2022,

     having regard to the convening of the first Intergovernmental Conference on Moldova’s accession to the EU, held in June 2024,

     having regard to Articles 2 and 49 of the Treaty on European Union,

     having regard to the joint statement of 13 June 2024 by the US, Canada and the UK on exposing Russia’s subversive activity and electoral interference targeting Moldova,

     having regard to Rules 136(2) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas on 20 October 2024, the Republic of Moldova is scheduled to hold a presidential election and a constitutional referendum on EU integration, amid ongoing Russian interference and attempts to destabilise the political situation and electoral process in the country;

    B. whereas the Russian Federation has been using economic blackmail, provocation, disinformation, illegal funding of political parties, cyberattacks and other hybrid means to undermine the stability, sovereignty, constitutional order and democratic institutions of the Republic of Moldova; whereas Russia’s subversive activities in Moldova seek to undermine popular support for the European path chosen by the people of Moldova and to incite destabilisation; whereas the active measures envisaged include establishing and promoting front organisations disguised as non-governmental organisations and ‘cultural centres’, disseminating online and offline disinformation, establishing strong pro-Russian political and societal constituencies and returning the Republic of Moldova to a state of dependency on Russian hydrocarbons;

    C. whereas in 2023, the EU imposed sanctions on key Moldovan oligarchs and pro-Russian actors, such as Ilan Shor, Vladimir Plahotniuc, Igor Ceaika, Gheorghe Cavaliuc and Marina Tauber, on the basis of a recently established sanctions regime targeting persons responsible for actions aimed at destabilising, undermining or threatening the sovereignty and independence of the Republic of Moldova; whereas allies of Mr Shor have reportedly actively recruited, arranged logistics for and provided financial compensation to individuals to join their protests; whereas on 3 October 2024, a large-scale electoral fraud operation was uncovered, financed by pro-Russian oligarch Ilan Shor, revealing that over USD 15 million had been transferred in September 2024 to over 130 000 Moldovan citizens involved in this voter bribery scheme; whereas on 18 September 2024, two close allies of Ilan Shor – deputy Marina Tauber and the Governor (Bashkan) of Gagauzia, Evghenia Guțul – met with the spokesperson of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, and subsequently gave false information about the EU and the Republic of Moldova’s future within it;

    D. whereas one of the tools used by the Russian state is the state-funded RT network (formerly Russia Today), which has moved beyond media activities, becoming actively involved in cyber operations, covert influence, military procurement and information warfare across various regions; whereas in June 2024, the US, together with the UK and Canada, exposed Russia’s efforts to engage in subversive activities and electoral interference targeting the Republic of Moldova;

    E. whereas in September 2024, the US imposed sanctions on three entities and two individuals for their involvement in Russia’s destabilising actions abroad, including in the Republic of Moldova; whereas these covert efforts have included RT personnel providing direct support to fugitive Moldovan oligarch Ilan Shor, the key perpetrator of the 2014 USD 1 billion bank fraud scandal; whereas, according to the US State Department, RT and its employees, including editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan, have directly coordinated with the Kremlin to support Russian Government efforts to influence the Moldovan presidential election of October 2024, with the apparent aim of inciting unrest in the Republic of Moldova;

    F. whereas the Security and Intelligence Service of the Republic of Moldova has reported an unprecedented level of intensity in Russia’s actions aimed at anchoring Moldova within its sphere of influence; whereas this hybrid threat is targeted at democratic processes and undermines European integration by amplifying radical separatist tendencies in the south of the country, particularly in Gagauzia (UTAG), using propaganda, manipulating the information space, interfering in the electoral process and conducting subversive operations; whereas Moldova’s national security services have stated that Russia is funding the ‘no’ campaign, with around EUR 100 million for pro-Russian political groups, and spreading disinformation on social media to sow doubt about the legitimacy of the electoral process; whereas in 2023, Ukrainian intelligence reported that it had intercepted a plan by Russia to stage a coup and oust Moldovan President Maia Sandu;

    G. whereas the Republic of Moldova has taken steps to combat Russian interference, including by banning pro-Russian political parties that are operating outside the law, sanctioning oligarchs, suspending media outlets that spread disinformation, and increasing customs controls; whereas Moldova’s updated national security strategy attributes disinformation campaigns and other hybrid attacks to Russia;

    H. whereas the unprovoked, unjustified and illegal war of aggression launched by the Russian Federation against Ukraine profoundly affects regional security and stability, endangering the Republic of Moldova’s macroeconomic situation, financial stability, democratic development and social cohesion, while further increasing the incidence and severity of poverty, inflation and emigration; whereas the Russian Federation, in cooperation with domestic Russia-sponsored actors, galvanises and uses the resultant widespread economic, geopolitical and security uncertainty to delegitimise and foster opposition to the Moldovan Government’s pro-European policies;

    I. whereas despite the dramatic effects of the war on Ukraine and these destabilisation attempts, the Republic of Moldova has managed to significantly consolidate its democracy, continue its reform trajectory and develop its relations with the EU; whereas the improvements in the country’s democratic system have been reflected in its progress on various international indexes; whereas the Moldovan Government’s enhanced implementation of current agreements demonstrates its commitment to closer cooperation with and integration into the EU;

    J. whereas the Republic of Moldova is a close and valued partner of the EU; whereas its application for EU membership, and the European Council’s decision to grant candidate country status to the Republic of Moldova on the understanding that nine steps are taken, demonstrates a strong joint ambition for swift EU integration; whereas through the Association Agreement and the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area, in force since 2016, the EU and Moldova have committed to promoting political association and achieving economic integration;

    K. whereas on 3 March 2022, the Republic of Moldova applied for EU membership, and on 23 June 2022, was granted candidate country status by unanimous agreement of all 27 EU Member States; whereas the EU opened accession negotiations with the Republic of Moldova during the first accession conference at ministerial level, held in Luxembourg on 25 June 2024, following the European Council’s decision of 14-15 December 2023 to open accession negotiations with Moldova, and the Council’s approval of the negotiating framework for these negotiations on 21 June 2024; whereas EU accession remains a merit-based process that requires the fulfilment of the EU membership criteria;

    L. whereas every sovereign state has the inherent right to defend itself and to invest in its defence and resilience capabilities, and such actions are consistent with the Republic of Moldova’s status of neutrality;

    M. whereas the Council has adopted assistance measures worth EUR 137 million for the benefit of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Moldova under the European Peace Facility since 2021;

    N. whereas on 24 April 2023, the EU set up the Partnership Mission in the Republic of Moldova (EUPM Moldova) under the common security and defence policy, with the objective of enhancing the security sector’s resilience in the areas of crisis management, hybrid threats, including cybersecurity and countering foreign information manipulation and interference; whereas on 21 May 2024, Moldova became the first country to sign a Security and Defence Partnership with the EU, which will help strengthen cooperation on security and defence policy between the EU and Moldova;

    O. whereas, according to several reports, many priests from the Metropolis of Moldova have travelled to Russia, where they received funds with the intention of using them for electoral purposes in the Republic of Moldova;

    1. Stands in solidarity with the people of the Republic of Moldova and reiterates its unwavering support for the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Moldova within its internationally recognised borders;

    2. Strongly condemns the escalating malicious activities, interference and hybrid operations by the Russian Federation, pro-Russian oligarchs and Russian-sponsored local actors aimed at undermining the electoral processes, security, sovereignty and democratic foundations of the Republic of Moldova, fostering divisions within Moldovan society and derailing the country’s pro-European trajectory, ahead of the upcoming presidential election and the constitutional referendum on EU integration;

    3. Reiterates its call on the Russian authorities to respect the Republic of Moldova’s independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to cease its provocations and attempts to destabilise the country and undermine its constitutional order and democratic institutions; reiterates its calls on Russia to withdraw its military forces and equipment from the territory of the Republic of Moldova, to ensure the full destruction of all ammunition and equipment in the Cobasna depot under international oversight and to support a peaceful resolution to the Transnistrian conflict, in line with the principles of international law and the 1999 Istanbul Summit Declaration of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe;

    4. Calls for the EU and its Member States to ensure that all necessary assistance is provided to the Republic of Moldova to strengthen its institutional mechanisms and its ability to respond to hybrid threats; calls for increased EU support for Moldova in countering disinformation, hybrid threats and cyberattacks; underlines that this should entail boosting Moldova’s capacity to combat disinformation, strengthen its cybersecurity infrastructure and enhance resilience against external malign influences; emphasises the particular importance of countering false Russian narratives, while underscoring their malign interference in the Republic of Moldova and the ways in which they are used to justify Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine;

    5. Calls on the Council to adopt additional targeted sanctions listings against individuals and entities responsible for supporting or carrying out actions which undermine or threaten the Republic of Moldova’s sovereignty and independence, as well as the country’s democracy, stability or security, and the rule of law; calls for the EU and national authorities to make sure those sanctions are duly implemented; reiterates its call on the respective hosting states and territories to extradite Ilan Shor, Vladimir Plahotniuc and other individuals sought for trial in the Republic of Moldova;

    6. Highlights the important role played by the EU Partnership Mission in the Republic of Moldova (EUPM Moldova); calls for the EU and its Member States to ensure that EUPM Moldova performs to the best of its ability, taking stock of progress and adapting its operations if necessary to make it as efficient as possible, while proposing to further extend its mandate beyond May 2025, adapt its scope and increase the mission’s resources; calls for the EU and its Member States to increase their support for Moldova’s Center for Strategic Communication and Combating Disinformation; calls on the Commission to report on the results of the EU support package for Moldova of June 2023, particularly the stated aim of countering foreign information manipulation and interference, and building capacity for independent media, civil society and youth;

    7. Applauds the Republic of Moldova’s steadfast support for Ukraine since the start of Russia’s war of aggression; commends the Republic of Moldova for welcoming 1.5 million Ukrainian refugees throughout the war, of which an estimated 125 000 remain in the country; calls for the EU and its Member States to ensure continued support for Moldova and its people in addressing the challenges facing the country as a consequence of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, including large numbers of refugees, inflation, threats to its energy supplies and violations of its airspace;

    8. Reaffirms its commitment to the Republic of Moldova’s future membership of the EU; believes that its membership in the EU would constitute a mutually beneficial investment in a united and strong Europe; welcomes the widespread support in the Republic of Moldova for its European integration; stresses that the Republic of Moldova’s European integration represents not only a path towards greater economic prosperity, but also a safeguard for political stability and security in the face of external threats;

    9. Calls for the acceleration of the screening process and the timely organisation of subsequent intergovernmental conferences, where negotiations on Cluster 1 on Fundamentals should be initiated; calls for the EU to adequately support accession-related reforms by developing robust and adaptable financial instruments tailored to the Republic of Moldova’s specific needs with a view to effectively addressing its economic and structural challenges, and ensuring the country remains resilient and capable of implementing the necessary reforms throughout its EU accession process; urges the acceleration of Moldova’s gradual integration into the EU and the single market by allowing participation in new initiatives and EU programmes, which will deliver tangible socio-economic benefits in specific areas even before the country formally joins the EU; reiterates its call, in this regard, for the EU to take swift and significant steps towards the permanent liberalisation of its tariff-rate quotas;

    10. Calls for more consistent support for the Republic of Moldova in its EU accession process, including increased technical assistance by sending additional EU advisors to the Moldovan authorities, as a contribution to strengthening capacity-building;

    11. Calls for the adoption of a new growth plan for the Republic of Moldova so as to adequately finance and support Moldova in achieving economic convergence with the EU; believes that this plan should finance investments in infrastructure, human capital and the digital and green transitions, facilitating sustainable economic growth;

    12. calls on the Commission, in this regard, to include the Republic of Moldova in the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance and to prioritise funding for candidate countries in its proposal for the next multiannual financial framework (2028-2034), ensuring the path towards EU membership;

    13. Welcomes the Republic of Moldova’s significant progress in implementing EU accession-related reforms and encourages the Moldovan authorities to continue the ambitious reforms on democracy and the rule of law; calls for the EU and its Member States to prioritise and allocate additional resources to efforts to support the rule of law and anti-corruption reforms in the Republic of Moldova in order to address vulnerabilities, including those related to corruption in the security sector, justice system, public administration and media, which could enable Russian interference and disinformation; encourages the Moldovan Government to continue working with all stakeholders towards a sustainable and comprehensive justice and anti-corruption reform, in line with EU and Venice Commission recommendations;

    14. Underlines the importance of advancing the country’s reform process in order to improve living standards, particularly for vulnerable groups, and to provide the younger generations with attractive prospects for life and work in the country, thereby increasing societal resilience to hybrid attacks and reducing the number of citizens seeking better living conditions elsewhere in Europe; highlights the need for the social acquis to be better represented in the Commission’s assessments and recommendations;

    15. Reiterates its support for stronger cooperation on security and defence policy between the EU and the Republic of Moldova; commends the Republic of Moldova for becoming the first country to sign a security and defence partnership with the EU and calls for this partnership to be put into practical action; calls for the EU to progressively include the Republic of Moldova in upcoming legislative initiatives and programmes relating to European security and defence; supports the continued work under the High-Level Political and Security Dialogue between the EU and the Republic of Moldova to enhance cooperation on foreign and security policy;

    16. Calls on the Member States to increase the European Peace Facility’s funding for the Republic of Moldova to further enhance the country’s defence capabilities;

    17. Reiterates its call for the EU and its Member States to continue supporting the efforts of the Moldovan authorities to maintain macroeconomic stability and enhance its energy security by supporting the construction of new electricity interconnections with neighbouring countries; calls for the EU and its Member States to financially support energy efficiency and renewable energy projects as a clean and sustainable way of reducing Moldova’s energy demand and diversifying its supply, while ensuring energy affordability, in particular for the most vulnerable groups;

    18. Urges the EU and its Member States to further strengthen cooperation with Moldova through targeted measures in order to enhance the country’s resilience to hybrid threats, including by improving strategic communications about the EU, supporting journalists and civil society in countering disinformation, promoting independent Russian-language media content and enhancing public information literacy; calls for additional resources and technical know-how to assist the Moldovan Government’s strategic communications, internal coordination and capacity-building against hybrid attacks and disinformation; commends the efforts of Moldovan civil society in supporting the Moldovan Government’s fight against disinformation and promoting democratic values; calls on the Commission and the Member States to continue supporting media literacy and media independence, as well as the strengthening of Moldova’s critical digital infrastructure, including through the replacement of Russian-origin information and communications technology systems; calls for the EU and its Member States to expand and intensify their direct engagement with Moldovan citizens by including them in various EU and bilateral programmes and projects, such as citizen consultations, and to foster people-to-people connections;

    19. Calls on the Commission to assist the Moldovan Government in putting pressure on social media platforms to address disinformation effectively;

    20. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the President, Government and Parliament of the Republic of Moldova, the United Nations, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, the Council of Europe and the Russian authorities.

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Discriminatory and inconsistent award of sustainable mobility grants in Valle d’Aosta – E-001769/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001769/2024/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Gaetano Pedulla’ (The Left), Dario Tamburrano (The Left), Mario Furore (The Left), Pasquale Tridico (The Left)

    In accordance with Article 7 of Regional Law No 16/2019, the Region of Valle d’Aosta provides sustainable mobility grants for natural persons ‘only if the beneficiaries have been residents of the region for at least 2 years, which do not have to be consecutive, and are resident there on the date of submission of the application’. The requirement for individuals to have been resident there for 2 years (not the condition that they must be residents on the date of application) seems unreasonable and discriminatory.

    If the aim of the measure is to improve the environment, limiting access to grants based on the period of residence is counter-productive. All residents who purchase zero and low-emission vehicles help to reduce pollution, regardless of how long they have lived in the region.

    Moreover, give that it is a monetary subsidy, award of the grant should not discriminate, even indirectly, against other Italian citizens, citizens of other Member States as well as non-EU citizens with the right to equal access to goods and services (Regulation (EU) No 492/2011[1], Directive 2003/109/EC, Directive 2011/98/EU, Directive (EU) 2016/801, etc.) who have been resident in Valle d’Aosta for less than 2 years[2].

    In view of the above, can the Commission indicate what action it could take to ensure that the principle of non-discrimination (Article 2 TEU) is fully respected, and that the 2-year residence requirement does not prevent genuinely equal and consistent access to these grants?

    Submitted: 19.9.2024

    • [1] Article 7(2) states that a worker who is a national of a Member State ‘shall enjoy the same social and tax advantages as national workers’.
    • [2] The Court of Justice of the European Union has repeatedly held that the past residence requirement constitutes indirect discrimination between nationals and foreign nationals, which is prohibited unless it is objectively justified. This means that it must be appropriate for securing the attainment of a legitimate objective and must not go beyond what is necessary to attain that objective (see judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 July 2019, Nicolas Aubriet v Ministre de l’Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche, Case C-410/18). It is also important to note that the Commission has recently referred Italy to the Court of Justice of the European Union in relation to the past residence requirement it has laid down for accessing a child benefit scheme (Infringement Decision INFR (2022) 4113).
    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: JOINT MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia – RC-B10-0070/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Rasa Juknevičienė, Michael Gahler, Andrzej Halicki, Sebastião Bugalho, David McAllister, Željana Zovko, Nicolás Pascual De La Parte, Isabel Wiseler‑Lima, Antonio López‑Istúriz White, Wouter Beke, Daniel Caspary, Jan Farský, Sandra Kalniete, Ondřej Kolář, Andrey Kovatchev, Andrius Kubilius, Miriam Lexmann, Vangelis Meimarakis, Ana Miguel Pedro, Davor Ivo Stier, Michał Szczerba, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Matej Tonin, Milan Zver
    on behalf of the PPE Group
    Yannis Maniatis, Nacho Sánchez Amor, Sven Mikser
    on behalf of the S&D Group
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Adam Bielan, Mariusz Kamiński, Rihards Kols, Reinis Pozņaks, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Carlo Fidanza, Veronika Vrecionová, Michał Dworczyk, Ondřej Krutílek, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Alberico Gambino, Assita Kanko
    on behalf of the ECR Group
    Urmas Paet, Petras Auštrevičius, Dan Barna, Helmut Brandstätter, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová, Bernard Guetta, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Marie‑Agnes Strack‑Zimmermann, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar, Dainius Žalimas
    on behalf of the Renew Group
    Reinier Van Lanschot
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group
    Jonas Sjöstedt, Hanna Gedin

    European Parliament resolution on the democratic backsliding and threats to political pluralism in Georgia

    (2024/2822(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on Georgia,

     having regard to the statement by the High Representative and the Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement of 17April 2024 on the adoption of the ‘transparency of foreign influence’ law,

     having regard to the statement by the High Representative of 18 September 2024 on the Georgian law on ‘family values and protection of minors’ ,

     having regard to the statement by the European External Action Service Spokesperson of 4 April 2024 on the draft law on ‘transparency of foreign influence’,

     having regard to the European Council conclusions of 14 and 15 December 2023 and of 27 June 2024,

     having regard to the Commission communication of 8 November 2023 entitled ‘2023 Communication on EU Enlargement Policy’ (COM(2023)0690),

     having regard to Resolution 2561 (2024) of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe entitled ‘Challenges to democracy in Georgia’,

     having regard to the Bucharest Declaration adopted by the Parliamentary Assembly of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) at the thirty-first annual session from 29 June to 3 July 2024,

     having regard to the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part[1],

     having regard to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,

     having regard to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR),

     having regard to the joint statement by the Chair of the Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Chair of the Delegation for relations with the South Caucasus and the European Parliament’s Standing Rapporteur on Georgia of 18 April 2024 on the reintroduction of the draft law on ‘transparency of foreign influence’ in Georgia,

     having regard to Rule 136(2) and (4) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas the past months have seen significant attacks on democracy in Georgia, which have been characterised by the hasty adoption of anti-democratic legislation criticised by the UN, the Venice Commission and the EU, concurrent with attacks on civil society and independent media, prolonged mass protests and the subsequent violent suppression of those peaceful protests, and deep political and societal tensions and polarisation;

    B. whereas the exercise of freedom of opinion, expression, association and peaceful assembly is a fundamental right enshrined in the Georgian Constitution;

    C. whereas Georgia, as a signatory to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as a member of the Council of Europe and the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, has committed itself to the principles of democracy, the rule of law and respect for fundamental freedoms and human rights;

    D. whereas Article 78 of the Georgian Constitution provides that ‘the constitutional bodies shall take all measures within the scope of their competence to ensure the full integration of Georgia into the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization’;

    E. whereas the EU expects Georgia, a candidate country for EU accession, to abide fully by the Association Agreement and other international commitments it has made and, in particular, to fulfil the conditions and take the steps set out in the Commission’s recommendation of 8 November 2023; whereas the European Council decided to grant candidate status to Georgia solely on the understanding that these steps would be taken, including combating disinformation and interference against the EU and its values, engaging opposition parties and civil society in governance, and ensuring freedom of assembly and expression, as well as meaningfully consulting civil society and involving it in legislative and policymaking processes and ensuring that it can operate freely;

    F. whereas civil society in Georgia has traditionally been very vibrant and active and played a pivotal role in soliciting and promoting democratic changes in the country, as well as in safeguarding and watching over their implementation;

    G. whereas on 20 February 2024, the Parliament of Georgia passed amendments to the Electoral Code changing the procedure for the election of chair and so-called professional members of the Central Election Commission and abolishing the post of deputy chair, which is filled by a representative of the opposition;

    H. whereas on 4 April 2024, less than a year before the elections, the Georgian Parliament adopted amendments to the country’s Electoral Code that modified fundamental aspects of the country’s electoral legislation, abolishing mandatory parliamentary quotas for women, which required that at least one out of four candidates on a party list be of a different gender than the majority;

    I. whereas on 28 May 2024, the Georgian Parliament adopted the so-called transparency of foreign influence law, after overriding the veto of President Salome Zourabishvili and despite mass protests by Georgian citizens and repeated calls from Georgia’s European partners to withdraw the draft law which, in spirit and content, contradicts EU norms and values; whereas adopting this law has effectively frozen Georgia’s accession process and led to the suspension of EU financial assistance for Georgia;

    J. whereas the law was adopted in a procedure which, according to the Venice Commission, left no space for genuine discussion and meaningful consultation, in open disregard for the concerns of large parts of the Georgian population; whereas the restrictions set by that law to the rights to freedom of expression and freedom of association and the right to privacy are incompatible with the strict test set out in Articles 8(2), 10(2), and 11(2) of the ECHR and Article 17(2), 19(2) and 22(2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights as they do not meet the requirements of legality, legitimacy, necessity and proportionality in a democratic society, and they are also incompatible with the principle of non-discrimination set out in Article 14 of the ECHR;

    K. whereas this legislation comes at a time of increasing and ongoing attacks against civil society in Georgia in a seeming effort to narrow civic space by starving independent groups of funds; whereas this legislation is modelled on the foreign agent legislation in Russia;

    L. whereas on 6 June 2024, the US imposed visa restrictions on dozens of Georgian officials over the adoption of the ‘foreign agents law’;

    M. whereas the European Council, in its conclusions of 27 June 2024, called on Georgia’s authorities to ‘clarify their intentions by reversing the current course of action which jeopardises Georgia’s EU path, de facto leading to a halt of the accession process’;

    N. whereas on 11 July 2024, the US Congress Committee on Foreign Affairs adopted Georgia sanctions legislation known as the Megobari Act, which imposes sanctions against Georgian officials responsible for undermining the country’s democratic system;

    O. whereas on 17 September 2024, the Georgian Parliament passed a law on ‘family values and the protection of minors’, which aims to ban reliable information about sexual orientation and gender identity;

    P. whereas the Georgian authorities have not taken into account a single recommendation of the Venice Commission regarding the annulment or modification of the above-mentioned laws on ‘transparency of foreign influence’ and ‘family values and the protection of minors’, the abolition of gender quotas in local and parliamentary elections, and the formation of the Central Election Commission;

    Q. whereas there is growing anti-Western and hostile rhetoric from the ruling Georgian Dream party against Georgia’s democratic partners, as well as promotion of Russian disinformation, manipulation and conspiracy theories; whereas that hostile rhetoric also targets Ukraine, as the ruling party uses despicable political banners depicting Ukrainian cities destroyed by Russia, thus capitalising on the suffering of brave Ukrainians; whereas the Georgian Dream party is pursuing a narrative of the West as a ‘global war party’ which is trying to push Georgia back into a war with Russia;

    R. whereas an increasing number of incidents indicate that Georgia is experiencing an insecure media environment, which poses a threat to its democracy; whereas Reporters Without Borders’ annual index on press freedom ranks Georgia 103rd out of 180 countries, a drop of 26 places from the previous year;

    S. whereas on 28 August 2024, the leader of Georgian Dream, Bidzina Ivanishvili, at the inauguration of his party’s electoral campaign, spoke of his intention to ban democratic opposition parties; whereas he was seconded by the Prime Minister, Irakli Kobakhidze, who stated that, if the party received a majority in the Georgian Parliament, it would ban certain opposition parties, and referred to the opposition as a ‘criminal political force’;

    T. whereas the Russian Foreign Minister’s statement expressing his readiness to help Georgia normalise its relations with ‘the neighbouring … states of Abkhazia and South Ossetia’ was praised by the leaders of the ruling party, demonstrating the Georgian Government’s departure from its policy of non-recognition of the occupied regions of Georgia;

    U. whereas parliamentary elections will take place in Georgia on 26 October 2024; whereas the law on ‘transparency of foreign influence’ has effectively blocked the requirement to have domestic observers, whose presence, according to OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights principles, would contribute to an increase in the transparency of and trust in the electoral process;

    1. Expresses its deep concern about the democratic backsliding in Georgia, which has occurred exponentially throughout this year and especially ahead of the parliamentary elections on 26 October 2024; strongly condemns the adoption of the law on ‘transparency of foreign influence’ and the law on ‘family values and protection of minors’, as well as the changes to the Electoral Code; considers that the above are tools used by the government to violate freedom of expression, censor media, impose restrictions on critical voices in civil society and the NGO sector or to discriminate against vulnerable people; underscores that the foregoing are also incompatible with EU values and democratic principles, run against Georgia’s ambitions for EU membership, damage Georgia’s international reputation and endanger the country’s Euro-Atlantic integration; strongly underlines that unless the above-mentioned legislation is rescinded, progress cannot be made in Georgia’s relations with the EU; regrets that Georgia, once a champion of democratic progress with Euro-Atlantic aspirations, has been in a democratic backsliding free fall for a considerable period;

    2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to investigate the consequences of the democratic backsliding that these laws represent for their donor role in Georgia and to communicate this possible impact to the Government and Parliament of Georgia; calls for all EU funding provided to the Georgian Government to be frozen until the above-mentioned undemocratic laws are repealed and for strict conditions to be placed on the disbursement of any future funding to the Georgian Government;

    3. Expresses its concern about the climate of hatred and intimidation fuelled by statements by Georgian Government representatives and political leaders, as well as by the government’s attacks on political pluralism; condemns comments by oligarch Bidzina Ivanishvili and leading figures of the government threatening to ban opposition parties and referring to the opposition as a ‘criminal political force’; notes that such intimidation seriously undermines the political process and the freedom of expression, and contributes to an environment of fear;

    4. Calls on the Georgian Bureau of Investigation to conduct a thorough investigation of police brutality against peaceful protestors during the spring protests against the law on ‘transparency of foreign influence’ in Georgia;

    5. Reiterates its calls on the Commission to promptly assess how Georgia’s ‘transparency of foreign influence’ and ‘family values and protection of minors’ laws, its abolition of gender quotas and other changes in its electoral legislation, the implementation of the Venice Commission’s recommendations in general and the conduct of the elections in line with accepted international standards, affect Georgia’s continuous fulfilment of the visa liberalisation benchmarks, in particular the fundamental rights benchmark, which is a crucial component of the EU visa liberalisation policy;

    6. Reiterates its unwavering support for the Georgian people’s legitimate European aspirations and their wish to live in a prosperous country, free from corruption, that fully respects fundamental freedoms, protects human rights and guarantees an open society and independent media; underlines that the decision to grant Georgia EU candidate country status was motivated by the wish to acknowledge the achievements and democratic efforts of Georgia’s civil society, as well as the overwhelming support for EU accession among its citizens, with over 80 % of the Georgian people consistently in favour; appreciates the efforts made by Georgia’s President Salome Zourabishvili to return Georgia to the democratic and pro-European path of development;

    7. Deplores the personal role played by Georgia’s oligarch Bidzina Ivanishvili, who returned to active politics on 30 December 2023 when he became ‘honorary chairman’ of the Georgian Dream party, in the current political crisis and in yet another attempt to undermine the Euro-Atlantic orientation of the country in favour of pivoting towards Russia; reiterates its call on the Council and the EU’s democratic partners to impose immediate and targeted personal sanctions on Ivanishvili for his role in the deterioration of the political process in Georgia;

    8. Calls for the EU and its Member States to hold to account and impose personal sanctions on all those responsible for undermining democracy in Georgia, who are complicit in the violence committed against political opponents and peaceful protesters and who spread anti-Western disinformation; welcomes the personal sanctions imposed by the US on Georgian Dream officials;

    9. Expresses concern about the fact that many recent legislative proposals adopted by the Georgian Dream majority in the Georgian Parliament betray the aspirations of the large majority of the Georgian people to live in a democratic society, continue democratic and rule of law reforms, pursue close cooperation with Euro-Atlantic partners and commit to a path towards EU membership;

    10. Emphasises that the rights to freedom of expression and assembly and to peaceful protest are fundamental freedoms and must be respected under all circumstances, particularly in a country aspiring to join the EU;

    11. Underlines that the public watchdog role exercised by civil society and independent media is essential to a democratic society and crucial in advancing EU accession-related reforms and therefore calls on the Georgian authorities to do their utmost to guarantee an enabling environment in which civil society and independent media can thrive;

    12. Recalls that the European Council of 14 and 15 December 2023 granted Georgia candidate country status on the understanding that the relevant steps set out in the Commission recommendation of 8 November 2023 would be taken; stresses that recently adopted legislation clearly goes against this ambition and has effectively put on hold Georgia’s integration into the EU;

    13. Reiterates its call on the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Commissioner for Neighbourhood and Enlargement and the President of the Commission to remind the Georgian Government of the commitments it made and the values and principles it subscribed to when it applied for EU membership;

    14. Reiterates the tangible opportunities that Georgia would take advantage of once the accession negotiations begin, such as pre-accession assistance that would improve the standard of living of Georgian citizens, as well as support the institutions, infrastructure and social services;

    15. Urges the Georgian authorities to ensure that the upcoming parliamentary elections in October 2024 adhere to the highest international standards, guaranteeing a transparent, free and fair process that reflects the democratic will of the people; presses for the abolition of the ingrained practice of misusing public resources and administrative capacity for the benefit of the ruling party; urges the Georgian authorities to take all necessary measures to ensure that all respected civil society organisations involved in election observation can observe these elections without hindrance or interference in their work;

    16. Shares the concerns raised by the Venice Commission about the adoption of amendments to the legal framework for elections in Georgia and the Electoral Code, agreeing that these changes to the Electoral Code will have a major impact on the stakeholders’ perceptions of and trust in the impartiality and fairness of the election administration;

    17. Expresses alarm at the decision to open only a limited number of polling stations abroad, despite numerous requests from the Georgian diaspora, thereby depriving the majority of Georgians living abroad of the right to vote; is deeply concerned by reports that the Government of Georgia is creating obstacles for the coalition of 30 NGOs and Transparency International Georgia in their efforts to conduct the ‘Go Out and Vote’ campaign; considers these obstacles to be an attempt to undermine democracy in the country;

    18. Notes that, amid significant international backlash questioning the legitimacy of the upcoming elections, the Prime Minister of Georgia ‘recommended’ that the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) revoke its decision of 24 September 2024 designating Transparency International Georgia as having ‘declared electoral goals’ which the ACB did on 2 October 2024; recalls that the initial decision, if enforced and not revoked, would deprive one of Georgia’s leading civil society organisations of access to foreign funding, severely hindering its ability to continue operations, including election observation, as well as raise concerns about the political neutrality of the ACB;

    19. Deplores the use by Georgian Dream of violent images of the war in Ukraine as a means of manipulating opinions and spreading disinformation and pro-Russian and anti-Ukrainian sentiment in its campaign ahead of the October 2024 elections;

    20. Expects Georgian Dream to respect the will and free choice of the Georgian people in the upcoming parliamentary elections and ensure a peaceful transfer of power; demands that Georgian Dream and its leaders immediately stop the violence, intimidation, hate speech, persecution and repression that it is committing against the opposition, civil society and independent media;

    21. Strongly believes that the upcoming elections will be decisive in determining Georgia’s future democratic development and geopolitical choice, as well its ability to make progress with its EU member state candidacy; recognises that it is still possible to consolidate Georgia’s democratic future as an EU candidate country with a young, engaged generation of leaders, which was exemplified by the spontaneous protests against the foreign agent law that took place during 2024;

    22. Expresses deep concern about the increased influence of Russia in Georgia, including increased immigration from Russia, increased trade ties with Russia and Georgia’s willingness to pursue reconciliation with Russia despite Russia’s war in Ukraine and its occupation of a fifth of Georgian sovereign territory; calls on the Government of Georgia to impose sanctions against Russia in response to its war of aggression against Ukraine, continue its previous policy of non-recognition of the occupied territories and honour its commitment to enforce effective measures to avoid the circumvention of European sanctions; encourages the Government of Georgia to align fully with the EU’s foreign policy and the EU’s strategy towards Russia;

    23. Strongly reiterates its urgent demand for the immediate and unconditional release of former President Mikheil Saakashvili on humanitarian grounds for the purpose of seeking medical treatment abroad; emphasises that the Georgian Government bears full and undeniable responsibility for the life, health, safety and well-being of former President Mikheil Saakashvili and must be held fully accountable for any harm that befalls him;

    24. Notes that the Georgian Government has further worsened access to public information, including Soviet-era archives, using the EU General Data Protection Regulation to falsely justify draconian restrictions to archive access, and that some of Georgia’s most important Soviet-era archives (including the archives of the former KGB and the former Central Committee of the Communist Party) have been completely closed since October 2023 without any explanation; highlights Russia’s manipulation and falsification of history, including Soviet history, as part of its war of aggression against Ukraine and its military threats against other countries; regrets the growing cult of Stalin and the related increase in Soviet nostalgia in Georgia, supported by the ruling government, which underscores its closer alignment with Russia;

    25. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the Council of Europe, the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe and the President, Government and Parliament of Georgia.

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas – B10-0101/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law

    Erik Marquardt, Ville Niinistö, Anna Cavazzini, Markéta Gregorová, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Mounir Satouri, Marie Toussaint, Kira Marie Peter‑Hansen, Rasmus Nordqvist, Villy Søvndal, Catarina Vieira, Majdouline Sbai
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    B10‑0101/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas.

    (2024/2857(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

      having regard to Rules 150 of its Rules of Procedure;

     

    A. whereas the UN attested that the serious and systemic human rights violations against the Uyghurs in Xinjiang may amount to crimes against humanity;

     

    B. whereas on 23 September 2014, Uyghur economist and human rights activist Ilham Tohti was sentenced to life due to his work to foster dialogue and understanding between Uyghurs and Han Chinese; whereas his imprisonment marked the start of the “Strike Hard Campaign against Violent Terrorism” in Xinjiang; whereas he was awarded the European Parliament Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought in 2019;

     

    C. whereas Gulshan Abbas went missing in 2018; whereas there were credible indications she had been sentenced to 20 years in prison in a secret trial, most likely in retaliation for the human rights advocacy conducted by her sister, Rushan Abbas, on behalf of the Uyghurs;

     

    1. Urges the PRC to immediately and unconditionally release Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas, and to stop harassing their families; urges the PRC to respect and restore families’ rights to visit detainees, including virtual communication;

     

    2. Urges the PRC to cease the brutal repression in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong, and to release all arbitrarily detained activists, among others, Ekpar Asat, Rahile Dawut, Jimmy Lai, Chow Hang-tung, Anya Sengdra,  Chadrel Rinpoche, Chen Yunfei, Ding Jiaxi, Ding Yuande, Gao Zhisheng, Go Sherab Gyatso, Golog Palden, He Fangmei, Huang Qi, Huang Xueqin, Hushtar Isa, Yalkun Isa, Li Yanhe, Peng Lifa, Qin Yongming, Qin Yongpei, Ruan Xiaohuan, Semkyi Dolma, Tashi Dorje, Tashpolat Tiyip, Wang Bingzhang, Wang Jianbing, Pastor Wang Yi, Kamile Wayit, Xu Na, Xu Qin, Xu Yan, Xu Zhiyong, Yang Henjung, Yang Maodong, Yu Wensheng, and Pastor Zhang Chunlei and Zhang Zhan;

     

    3. Condemns the extraterritorial repression against Chinese dissidents or the Uyghur community abroad; calls on the Member States to suspend extradition treaties with the PRC;

     

    4. Stresses that, in March 2021, the EU adopted human rights sanctions against Chinese officials and entities responsible for the violations against Uyghurs; recalls that China immediately and unjustifiably sanctioned 5 MEPs, the DROI subcommittee, national MPs and prominent think tanks among others, and that those sanctions are still in place;

     

    5. Stresses that the continuous and serious deterioration of human rights in China will have consequences for the bilateral EU-China relations; expresses strong disappointment about the latest EU-China Human Rights Dialogue, the fact that the EU did not demand information on Tohti’s health conditions as a pre-condition;

     

    6. Welcomes the adoption of a forced labour import ban by the EU and insists on the allocation of adequate financing for its implementation; is alarmed at the increase of exports from Xinjiang to the EU by 140% this year; condemns the unfounded claims by Volkswagen that its Xinjiang factories are forced-labour-free and that the audit failed to meet international standards;

     

    7. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the HR/VP, the PRC and the UN.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas – B10-0116/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law

    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Raphaël Glucksmann, Pina Picierno
    on behalf of the S&D Group

    B10‑0116/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas

    (2024/2857(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

    – having regard to Rule 150 of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas in 2014 the Xinjiang People’s High Court convicted Ilham Tohti on politically motivated charges of “separatism” and sentenced him to life in prison; whereas his family was not allowed visiting him since 2017; whereas he is in solitary confinement since under arrest; whereas in 2024 his Uyghur prison guard Ghopur Abdurishit was jailed for leaking information regarding Tohti’s conditions; whereas Ilham Tohti was awarded the European Parliament Sakharov Prize for Freedom of Thought in 2019;

    B. whereas Gulshan Abbas is serving a 20-year sentence since 2019 on fallacious terrorism-related charges; whereas Gulshan Abbas was detained six days after her sister, a Uyghur human rights defender, criticised the persecution of the Uyghur people in China; whereas Gulshan Abbas suffers from a number of health complications;

    C. whereas the repression against Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas reflect the Chinese government’s abuses against the Uyghurs in the Xinjian Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR);

    1. Urges the Chinese authorities to quash the conviction of Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas and to immediately and unconditionally release them along with all those arbitrarily detained in China;

    2. Demands the Chinese authorities to guarantee their access to medical care and unrestricted access to their lawyers, to provide their families with their whereabouts and to ensure family visiting rights, including through virtual communication;

    3. Condemns the human rights violations perpetrated by the Chinese authorities, including against Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim ethnic people in Xinjiang; Calls on Member States to swiftly adopt additional sanctions against high-ranking officials and entities involved in the Human Rights violations in XUAR;

    4. Requires the Chinese authorities to halt their repression in the XUAR, targeting Uyghurs with policies that amount to  crime against humanity, as reported by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) in 2022, and represent a serious risk of genocide;

    5. Strongly condemns China’s lack of implementation of the OHCHR and the Universal Periodic Review recommendations as well as the lack of cooperation with UN human rights bodies; invites OHCHR to issue a comprehensive update on the situation in Xinjiang and to present an action plan to hold the Chinese government accountable;

    6. Calls on the EU institutions and Member States to use every opportunity to request the release of Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas to the PRC authorities and to implement the OHCHR report;

    7. Urges the Member States to apply, without delay or restrictions, the principle of non-refoulement to all persons fleeing persecution from Xinjiang and to offer international protection;

     

    8. Urges Member States to mitigate all risks of transnational repression against Chinese dissidents and Uyghur people on their territory and to prosecute responsible individuals;

    9. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Chinese authorities, the HRVP, the Commission, the Member States, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Secretary-General.

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas – B10-0115/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law
    pursuant to Rule 150 of the Rules of Procedure

    Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Helmut Brandstätter, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Urmas Paet, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    Document selected :  

    B10-0115/2024

    Texts tabled :

    B10-0115/2024

    Texts adopted :

    B10‑0115/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas

    (2024/2857(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

      having regard to the 2019 Sakharov Prize to Ilham Tohti, an economist fighting peacefully for the rights of China’s Uyghur minority,

      having regard to Rules 150 of its Rules of Procedure; 

     

    1. whereas respect for human rights, democracy, and the rule of law is a major preoccupation of the EU relations with the PRC;
    2. Whereas China systemically persecutes Uyghurs, Tibetans, Mongols and other minorities, human rights and democracy defenders, religious groups, and journalists, especially in Xinjiang, Tibet, Hong Kong and Macao;
    3. whereas in 2014 Ilham Tohti was sentenced to life imprisonment for ‘separatism’ and in 2019 Gulshan Abbas was sentenced to 20 years after her sister spoke publicly about the situation in Xinjiang; whereas both are held incommunicado and their health is deteriorating;
    4. Whereas the Xinjiang Police Files provide evidence of the involvement of the Central Government in Beijing and Xinjiang Region officials in the mass internment of 1-2 million Uyghurs and others;
    5. Whereas the PRC stifles discussion of these repressions through massive censorship on social media and in academia;

     

    1. Strongly condemns the persecution of Uyghurs in the Xinjiang Region and the systematic human rights violations, including forced labour, sterilisations and acculturation and destruction of cultural heritage, that amount to crimes against humanity and genocide;
    2. Reiterates its call for the immediate and unconditional release of unjustly imprisoned Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas and to ensure their regular contact with family and lawyers, and medical care;
    3. Urges the PRC and local authorities to cease its brutal repression in Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong, and for the release of all arbitrarily detained activists, including Ekpar Asat, Rahile Dawut, Jimmy Lai, Chow Hang-tung, Anya Sengdra,  Chadrel Rinpoche, Chen Yunfei, Ding Jiaxi, Ding Yuande, Gao Zhisheng, Go Sherab Gyatso, Golog Palden, He Fangmei, Huang Qi, Huang Xueqin, Hushtar Isa, Yalkun Isa, Li Yanhe, Peng Lifa, Qin Yongming, Qin Yongpei, Ruan Xiaohuan, Semkyi Dolma, Tashi Dorje, Tashpolat Tiyip, Wang Bingzhang, Wang Jianbing, Pastor Wang Yi, Kamile Wayit, Xu Na, Xu Qin, Xu Yan, Xu Zhiyong, Yang Henjung, Yang Maodong, Yu Wensheng, Pastor Zhang Chunlei Zhang Zhan,  and EU citizen Gui Minhai as well as ending the harassment of their families and providing information about their location as well as medical conditions while allowing contact with their families;
    4. Calls for establishing an independent international mechanism to investigate allegations of human rights violations in Xinjiang; urges the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to provide an update on the situation in Xinjiang and recommendations for holding the Chinese government accountable;
    5. Regrets that the EU-China Human Rights Dialogue lacks goodwill on the part of China and does not produce tangible results; calls on the HR/VP to invite MEPs to this Dialogue and to initiate further human rights sanctions on all PRC officials involved in human rights abuses in Xinjiang and elsewhere in China;
    6. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Member States, the HR/VP, the PRC and the UN.

     

     

    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The case of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas – B10-0118/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law
    pursuant to Rule 150 of the Rules of Procedure

    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński, Adam Bielan, Alberico Gambino, Mariusz Kamiński, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Veronika Vrecionová, Alexandr Vondra, Roberts Zīle, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Reinis Pozņaks, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Charlie Weimers, Ivaylo Valchev, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Michał Dworczyk, Jaak Madison, Carlo Fidanza, Ondřej Krutílek, Assita Kanko, Şerban‑Dimitrie Sturdza, Claudiu‑Richard Târziu
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    B10‑0118/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the case of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas

    (2024/2857(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

      having regard to its previous resolutions on the People’s Republic of China (PRC),

     

      having regard to Rule 150 of its Rules of Procedure,

     

    1. whereas the PRC is implementing increasingly oppressive domestic policies, repressing any form of dissent, cracking down on all civil and political freedoms and targeting religious and ethnic minorities;

     

    1. whereas Ilham Tohti, who has worked tirelessly to foster dialogue and understanding between Uyghurs and Han Chinese, was sentenced to life in prison in September 2014 for advocating for the rights of Uyghurs and other minority groups in the PRC; whereas his family is denied any official information about his whereabouts and physical and health conditions; whereas Tohti was awarded the Sakharov Prize in 2019;

     

    1. whereas in September 2018, local authorities in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR), forcibly disappeared Gulshan Abbas, a retired medical doctor; whereas in 2019, Abbas was reportedly sentenced to 20 years in prison on charges of “participating in a terrorist organization,” “aiding terrorist activities,” and “gathering a crowd to disrupt social order.”; whereas reportedly her medical condition is worrying;

     

    1. Whereas aforementioned cases demonstrate the PRC’s efforts to silence those brave enough to speak out against the government’s discriminatory practices and other human rights abuses, which include genocide and crimes against humanity in XUAR;

     

    1. whereas since April 2017, over one million innocent Uyghurs have been arbitrarily detained in a network of internment camps, where they are forced to renounce their ethnic identity and religious beliefs and swear loyalty to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP);

     

    1. whereas during the 39th EU-China joint Human Rights Dialogue, the EU called for the immediate release of Ilham Tohti, Gulshan Abbas, among others;

     

    ***

     

    1. Calls for the immediate and unconditional release of Ilham Tohti, Gulshan Abbas and other human rights defenders, lawyers and intellectuals who are arbitrarily detained in in Xinjiang and other parts of China;

     

    1. Calls on the PRC authorities to allow Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas unimpeded access to their families and the lawyers of their choice, to provide information on their whereabouts and health status;

     

    1. Condemns once again the PRC’s ongoing atrocities in Xinjiang; calls on the PRC to respect and protect the human dignity and human rights of all, including persons belonging to religious, ethnic and linguistic minorities in China; urges the PRC authorities to terminate systemic repression and to close all detention camps;

     

    1. Insists that China respects and guarantees the right to freedom of religion or belief and refrain from monitoring, harassing, detaining or otherwise intimidating leaders and members of religious groups; condemns continuous actions to restrict religious activities in China; invites businesses operating in PRC, in particular XUAR, to carry out more thorough human rights due diligence;

     

    1. Calls on the Council to continue imposing human rights sanctions on all officials involved in human rights abuses in XUAR and elsewhere in China;

     

    1. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Government and the National People’s Congress of the PRC;

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas – B10-0117/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law

    Sebastião Bugalho, Miriam Lexmann, Michael Gahler, David McAllister, Paulo Cunha, Isabel Wiseler‑Lima, Luděk Niedermayer, Ana Miguel Pedro, Mirosława Nykiel, Marta Wcisło, Vangelis Meimarakis, Loránt Vincze, Danuše Nerudová, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Tomáš Zdechovský, Nicolás Pascual De La Parte, Jörgen Warborn, Wouter Beke, Željana Zovko
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    B10‑0117/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas

    (2024/2857(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on the People’s Republic of China (PRC),

     having regard to Rule 150 of its Rules of Procedure,

     

    A. whereas the promotion of and respect for human rights, democracy and the rule of law should be at the centre of the EU’s relations with China, in line with the EU’s commitment to uphold these values in its external action and China’s commitment to adhere to them in its own development and international cooperation;

     

    B. whereas Ilham Tohti, who has worked tirelessly to foster dialogue and understanding between Uyghurs and Han Chinese for more than two decades, was given a life sentence by the Chinese for his activism in September 2014;

     

    C. whereas Gulshan Abbas, a retired Uyghur doctor who was sentenced to 20 years in prison on terrorism charges and seriously disrupting social order in a secret trial in March 2019, a sentence which  is believed to be linked to her sister, Rushan Abbas’s work in exposing the regime’s crimes against humanity committed against the Uyghurs;

    whereas doctor Abbas urgently needs medical treatment for her multiple chronic diseases;

     

    D. whereas since 2017, various NGOs have repeatedly reported that China has been pursuing the mass detention of Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim ethnic groups in Xinjiang;

     

    1.  Calls for an end to China’s brutal repression across mainland China, including Xinjiang, Tibet, as well as Hong Kong and Macau; condemns China’s state-directed repression, crimes against humanity and arbitrary detention against the Uyghur minority, which violated fundamental human rights;

     

    2.  Reiterates its calls on the Chinese authorities to immediately and unconditionally release the scholar and 2019 Sakharov Prize Laureate Ilham Tohti and Dr. Gulshan Abbas, and at the meantime to ensure that they have regular and unrestricted access to their family and the lawyers of their choice and medical treatments;

     

    3. Calls on the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights to set up an independent international mechanism   to monitor, report on, and investigate allegations of severe human rights violations in China, including crimes against humanity in Xinjiang and present an action plan to hold the Chinese government accountable;

     

    4. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, and the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the UN Secretary-General, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, the Government and Parliament of the People’s Republic of China.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law – B10-0088/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law
    pursuant to Rule 150 of the Rules of Procedure

    Rima Hassan
    on behalf of The Left Group

    Document selected :  

    B10-0088/2024

    Texts tabled :

    B10-0088/2024

    Texts adopted :

    B10‑0088/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law

    (2024/2858(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

      having regard to Rule 150 of its Rules of Procedure,

     

    1. whereas Iraq’s Personal Status Law, governs matters of marriage, divorce, child custody and inheritance for Muslims, was considered one of the most progressive in the region; whereas despite widespread protest and condemnation, amendments to the law were passed in their second reading by the Parliament; whereas according to UN experts if enacted, it would constitute a serious roll-back of women and children´s rights, particularly in areas such marriage, divorce, and child custody and would likely exacerbate the prevalence and forms of violence against women and girls;

     

    1. whereas the draft amendment would legalize the unregistered marriages which are often done as a way to circumvent legal restrictions on child marriage, polygamy, and forced marriage and to evade having to pay spousal maintenance in case of divorce; whereas women in unregistered marriages faced severe challenges in accessing government services and social protection; whereas according to a  report by the UNAMI, 22 percent of unregistered marriages involved girls under 14;

     

     

     

    1. Calls on the Iraqi authorities to reconsider the amendments to the Personal Status Law and to ensure the protection of the rights of all Iraqi citizens while promoting equality and women´s rights;
    2. Praises the women, including members of the Parliament, that have condemned the reform and fought to preserve one of the most progressive in the region;
    3. Urges the authorities to adopt a national action plan to eliminate child marriage and to set the minimum age of marriage at 18;
    4. Asks to reform the relevant laws governing citizenship and birth registration, to permit the registration of all births and the obtention of Iraqi citizenship and associated legal documents;
    5. Urges the authorities to ensure that existing legislation, including articles 41(1), 128, 398 and 409  of the Iraqi Penal Code, is revised to comply with international standards on women´s rights and to the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child;
    6. Calls on the authorities to combat gender-based violence including discrimination against LGBTIQ+ and to ensure accountability of perpetrators without delay; in particular urges the Council of Representatives to adopt a law to combat Violence Against Women and to fully criminalize marital rape in all circumstances; requires to de authorities to ensure avenues to seek shelter, medical care, legal recourse and reparations for persons at risk of such violence;
    7. Demands to increase and improve access to reproductive healthcare, for all girls and women in rural and urban areas, by allocating greater resources from national health expenditure;
    8. Denounces that  the West countries´ double standards on demanding the respect of human rights and international law, feeds those who do not want to respect international norms;
    9. Urges the EU to direct funding towards organizations working on women´s rights in particular early and forced marriage, violence against women, and assistance to issue or reissue documents and legalize their marriages;
    10. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the EU institutions, Member States, and the Iraqi authorities.
    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on the cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas – B10-0114/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law
    pursuant to Rule 150 of the Rules of Procedure

    Rima Hassan
    on behalf of The Left Group

    Document selected :  

    B10-0114/2024

    Texts tabled :

    B10-0114/2024

    Texts adopted :

    B10‑0114/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the cases of unjustly imprisoned Uyghurs in China, notably Ilham Tohti and Gulshan Abbas

    (2024/2857(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

    – having regard to its previous resolutions and reports on the situation in China,

    – having regard to Article 4 and 36 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China,

    – having regard to Rule 150 of its Rules of Procedure,

     

    1. Whereas massive and structural violations of human rights against Uyghur persist, notably in Xinjiang ;
    2. Whereas in May 2022 for the first time in 17 years, a UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has been able to travel six days in China ; whereas OHCHR issued shortly after an assessment of human rights concerns in China’s Xinjiang following allegations of serious violations against Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim communities, in a context of the Chinese Government’s policies and measures to combat terrorism and extremism;

     

    1. Whereas in 2022 the Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) called on China to immediately investigate all allegations of human rights violations in Xinjiang;
    2. Whereas on the International Day to Combat Islamophobia, eight OHCHR Special Rapporteurs have warned against acts of harassment, intimidation, violence and incitement based on religion or belief that have risen to “alarming levels” across the world, including by State actors, in particular against Muslims;

     

    1. Reiterates its call for the release Ilham Tohti, Gulshan Abbas and other Uighurs unjustly imprisoned;
    2. Reiterates its call for unrestricted access to their family and the lawyers of their choice; 
    3. Calls on the Chinese and local authorities to put an end to the repression of Uyghurs and recalls that the Uyghurs in the Xinjiang region have been subjected to intense surveillance, forced labour, involuntary sterilisations and birth prevention measures, among other rights abuses, which may amount to crimes against humanity, as acknowledged in the 2022 OHCHR report;
    4. Recalls that China has ratified the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment;
    5. Calls on UN Human Rights office to promptly issue a comprehensive update on the current situation in Xinjiang;
    6. Supports a resolution at the Human Rights Council to set up an independent international mechanism to monitor and investigate allegations of severe human rights violations, including potential crimes against humanity in Xinjiang ;
    7. Praises the work of Spokesperson for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights calling again on the authorities to undertake a full review of the legal framework governing national security and counter-terrorism;
    8. Notes a worrying increase, around the world, including China, of the use of the fight against terrorism to repress populations or political opponents;
    9. Calls for an impact assessment on the new regulation on prohibiting products made with forced labour on the Union market in view to remedy loopholes, notably on alternative trades to prevent supply chain disruption;
    10. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the VP/HR, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, the UN Secretary-General, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, and to the Government and Parliament of the People’s Republic of China.

     

     

    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law – B10-0091/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law
    pursuant to Rule 150 of the Rules of Procedure

    Abir Al‑Sahlani, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Raquel García Hermida‑Van Der Walle, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Ilhan Kyuchyuk, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan‑Christoph Oetjen, Urmas Paet, Hilde Vautmans, Lucia Yar
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    Document selected :  

    B10-0091/2024

    Texts tabled :

    B10-0091/2024

    Texts adopted :

    B10‑0091/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law

    (2024/2858(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

    – having regard to its previous resolutions on Iraq;

    – having regard to Rules 150 of its Rules of Procedure;

    1. whereas Iraq is drafting a new, highly restrictive bill on women’s rights amending Personal Status law 188/1959; whereas family matters, including on marriage, divorce and child custody, would effectively fall under the remit of religious courts rather than civil courts, entailing disturbing discrepancies along religious and socio-economic lines; whereas the minimum legal age for girls to marry would be nine years and there are fears of increased violence against women in the future; whereas the Supreme Court approved the most problematic amendments before a third reading which was postponed on October 2nd;whereas the situation of women rights in Iraq was already under heavy criticism before;
    2. whereas Iraq’s UN mission UNITAD, which worked on sexual crimes committed by Daesh against women, particularly Yazidis, has had to close on September 17, 2024 following the decision, supported by Russia and China, to discontinue their UNSC mandate a year ago; whereas Iraq’s UN Mission UNAMI will also have to close in 2025, while UNICEF has been downsizing; whereas all mentions of gender have since been deleted from public reports, including on sexual crimes and women’s role in conflict resolution, at the request of Iraqi authorities; whereas since April 2024 a new law has criminalized the LGBTQ community with up to 15 years in prison; whereas last August, on the event of the ten year commemoration of the Daesh massacre of the Yazidi people in Iraq, Kurdish Iraqi politicians shared hate speech against them ahead of elections;
    1. urges the EU High Representative to publically deplore Iraq’s repressive personal status bill and underlines that the bill would violate Iraq’s international obligations as regards women’s fundamental rights;
    2. calls on the EU delegation to Iraq to intensify its dialogue with Iraqi civil society on the bill, and to pre-condition development grants to judicial training and the establishment of women shelters;
    3. calls to reinforce EU-Iraq cooperation in criminal justice reform, notably to include internationally recognised criminal offenses, notably the use of sexual violence in armed conflicts, to fight impunity for crimes committed by Daesh against women and girls; calls on Iraqi authorities to refer to relevant and competent organisations to specifically train judges and prosecutors on sexual and gender-based violence;
    4. urges EU-Iraq security and counter-terrorism partnerships to include, as strategic priority, the prosecution of international crimes that include sexual and gender-based violence;
    5. calls for a reinforced partnership with the Human rights committee of Iraq’s Parliament, involving legal experts in the process of cancelling the bill, to align with international obligations, in particular on forced marriage and the rights of women and girls, in line with the Convention for the Elimination of Discriminations against Women;
    6. is highly concerned by the lack of legal protection for domestic violence against women and children;
    7. instructs its President to translate this resolution into Arabic and forward it to Iraq’s Parliament and Government.
    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law – B10-0089/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law

    Hannah Neumann, Benedetta Scuderi, Ville Niinistö, Nicolae Ştefănuță, Mounir Satouri, Catarina Vieira
    on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

    B10‑0089/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law

     

    (2024/2858(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to Rule 150,

     

    A. whereas the Council of Representatives of Iraq is discussing amendments to the Personal Status Law of 1959, which aim to legalise child marriage by lowering the minimum age for marriage for women from 18 to 9 years old and for men from 18 to 15 years old; whereas this draft proposal aims to give religious institutions six months to develop a “code of Islamic law rulings on personal status matters”, bypassing any public review further weakening the legal protection for women regarding divorce and inheritance rights, among other issues;

     

    B. whereas the Iraqi constitution prohibits gender-based discrimination; whereas Iraq has signed and ratified key international human rights instruments, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), the Convention on Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW);

     

    C. whereas Iraqi women and girls have faced particular challenges stemming from years of conflict and displacement and the lack of appropriate legal frameworks and services, paired with conservative social norms;

     

    D. whereas human rights constitute an essential element of the EU-Iraq Partnership and Cooperation Agreement;

     

    1. Rejects the amendments proposed to the Personal Status Law, which contravene the Iraqi constitution and the international human rights obligations that Iraq has adhered to and calls on the Iraqi Council of Representatives to fully and immediately withdraw them;

     

    1. Is deeply concerned about the potentially dramatic effects that the adoption of these amendments would have on women’s and girls’ rights in Iraq, which could result in a significant rollback compared to 1959, an increasingly negative reputation of the country and the withholding of some development aid and foreign assistance from bilateral and multilateral organisations, which would thus increase socioeconomic pressures;

     

    1. Calls on Iraq to show a real commitment to protecting and upholding women’s rights by setting the minimum age of marriage at 18 years old without exceptions and by adopting an action plan aimed at eliminating child marriages and strengthening women’s rights, in accordance with international standards;

     

    1. Urges the Iraqi authorities to criminalise marital rape in all circumstances and to repeal discriminatory provisions against women in the Criminal Code that grant husbands a legal right to punish their wives and provide mitigated sentences for male perpetrators of honour killings against their espouses; calls on Iraq to adopt comprehensive legislation to combat domestic violence in line with its international obligations;

     

    1. Calls on the EU and Iraq to hold regular human rights dialogues and to convene a Cooperation Committee to address topics related to human rights and gender equality; highlights the crucial role played by human rights defenders in Iraq and calls on the Commission and the Member States to increase their logistical and financial support to independent civil society organisations in Iraq, particularly those working on women’s rights;

     

    1. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the HR/VP, the Council of Representatives of Iraq and the Government of Iraq.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law – B10-0094/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law
    pursuant to Rule 150 of the Rules of Procedure

    Joachim Stanisław BrudzińskiClaudiu, Adam Bielan, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Alberico Gambino, Veronika Vrecionová, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Alexandr Vondra, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Sebastian Tynkkynen, Charlie Weimers, Ivaylo Valchev, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Emmanouil Fragkos, Beatrice Timgren, Marion Maréchal, Bogdan Rzońca, Michał Dworczyk, Marlena Maląg, Ondřej Krutílek, Carlo Fidanza, Assita Kanko, Şerban-Dimitrie Sturdza, Richard Târziu
    on behalf of the ECR Group

    B10‑0094/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law

    (2024/2858(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

      having regard to its previous resolutions on Iraq,

      having regard to Rule 150 of its Rules of Procedure,

     

    1. Whereas the human rights situation in Iraq is increasingly alarming, as evidenced by the recent proposed amendments to the Personal Status Law and the stalemate over the adoption of a domestic violence law, sent by the Presidency to the Iraqi parliament in 2019;

     

    1. Whereas the amendments to Personal Status Law conflict with certain constitutional provisions, such as Article 14 on the right to legal equality, as well as with international human rights law; whereas the amendments would violate the human rights of women and children and in particular legalize child marriages for girls as young as 9 and boys as young as 15, while also undermining women’s rights in other aspects, such as divorce and inheritance, and puts them at increased risk of sexual, physical and domestic violence, mental and physical health consequences, social isolation, and dropping out of school;

     

    1. Whereas the amendments would weaken legal protections for women as it allows couples to choose whether to follow civil law or specific Islamic schools of jurisprudence; whereas in case of dispute over which sect’s law should apply, the sect of the husband takes precedence, violating then Iraq’s obligations under international law to uphold equal rights for women; whereas women and girls may end up coerced into accepting religious practices not of their choosing which is in direct violation to the fundamental right to the freedom of religion or belief;

     

    1. Whereas the dominance of the Coordination Framework, the hard-line ruling Shi’te coalition, plays a significant role in this regression in terms of human rights as they are often influenced by strict interpretations of Sharia law;

     

    1. Calls on the Council of Representatives to reject the proposed amendments to the Personal Status Law that threaten the human rights of women and girls, and to ensure that any proposed legislation protects the rights of women and children, in line with Iraq’s international human rights commitments;

     

    1. Underlines that these amendments could deepen sectarianism in Iraq and undermine freedom of religion or belief as a human right, create a parallel authority to that of the state and lead to unequal treatment as sect, not citizenship, would dictate which rights Iraqis are afforded in their personal life;

     

    1. Urges the Council of Representatives to adopt the long awaited law against domestic violence;

     

    1. Recalls that the current Personal Status Law requires children whose at least one parent has converted to Islam to become Muslims themselves; deplores that the proposed amendments to the law, if enacted, would lead to an even more radical application of Sharia law; states that these new provisions would also undermine the Iraqi State and affect the country’s minorities; expresses its deep concern about the consequences of these amendments for Iraq’s Christian communities;

     

    1.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the EUSR for Human Rights, the Government and Council of Representatives of Iraq.

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law – B10-0093/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law

    Sebastião Bugalho, Ingeborg Ter Laak, Michael Gahler, David McAllister, Ana Miguel Pedro, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Paulo Cunha, Luděk Niedermayer, Mirosława Nykiel, Marta Wcisło, Vangelis Meimarakis, Danuše Nerudová, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Nicolás Pascual De La Parte, Tomáš Zdechovský, Jörgen Warborn, Wouter Beke, Željana Zovko, Miriam Lexmann
    on behalf of the PPE Group

    B10‑0093/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law

    (2024/2858(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on Iraq,

     

     having regard to the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European   Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Iraq, of the other   part,

     

     having regard to Iraq’s Personal Status Law adopted in 1959, which governs matters   of marriage, divorce, child custody and inheritance in Iraq,   

     

     having regard to the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), acceded to by Iraq   on 1994,

     

     having regard to article 23(3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political  Rights   (ICCPR), of which Iraq has been a State Party since 1971 that no marriage   shall be entered into without free and full consent of the intending spouses,

     

     having regard to Rule 150 of its Rules of Procedure,

     

    A.  whereas the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law, could legalize child   marriage for girls and boys;

     

    B.  whereas the proposal would legalize unregistered marriages, and allow religious  leaders, to finalize them; whereas according to a 2021 report by the U.N. Assistance   Mission in Iraq (UNAMI) 22 percent of unregistered marriages involves girls under   14;

     

    C.  whereas under the proposal, couples entering into a marriage contract can choose  whether to apply the provisions of the Personal Status Law or the provisions of   specific Islamic schools of jurisprudence; whereas this would mean that sect, rather   than citizenship, determines the rights afforded to Iraqis in their personal lives,   effectively creating separate legal systems for different sects and further   entrenching sectarianism in Iraq;

     

    D.  whereas the proposed amendments would have negative consequences on women in   personal status matters, including marriage, divorce, inheritance and child custody;

     

    E.  whereas 73 percent of respondents surveyed by the Iraq Polling Team expressed “strong    opposition” to the changes to the 1959 law;

     

    1.  Calls upon the Iraqi Parliament to reject the proposed amendments to the Personal   Status Law No. 188 of the year 1959;

     

    2.  Calls on the EU and its Member States to condemn the proposed changes to the  Personal Status Law;

     

    3.  Calls on EU and its Member States to express their concerns about the proposed  changes to the Personal Status Law to the Iraqi authorities;

     

    4.  Expresses its support for women’s and children’s rights campaigners and civil society   groups   protesting across the country against the recent proposal to amend the Personal   Status   Law;

     

    5.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Government and Parliament of   the Republic of Iraq, the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of   the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Commission, the EU   Member States, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and the   UN Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the situation of women’s rights in Iraq and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law – B10-0090/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law

    B10‑0090/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the situation of women’s rights in Iraq and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law#TXTTITLE@TITLE@#

    (2024/2858(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to Rule 150 of its Rules of Procedure,

     

     

     

    A. whereas since the regime change in Iraq in 2003 after the US military invasion, the situation of women in Iraq has continued to deteriorate; whereas practices such as child marriage, temporary marriage, forced marriage, female genital mutilation, honour killings continue to exist; whereas according to the Supreme Judicial Council of Iraq, there has been a disturbing increase in domestic violence cases, with 53,889 incidents, recorded over past three years; whereas, although the law allows for the marriage of girls from 15 years of age only in exceptional circumstances, more than 1 in 4 girls (28 %) had married before they reached the age of 18;

     

    B.  whereas since 2003, Christians in Iraq, many of them women, have been severely persecuted, and have been victim of systemic displacement, violence and legal discrimination; whereas the Christian population in Iraq has drastically reduced from 1,5 million in 2003 to 150,000 today; whereas Iraq’s blasphemy laws have been used to arrest and intimidate people for their religious beliefs;

     

    C. whereas the proposal to amend the Iraqi Personal Status Law no. 188 of 1959 would allow for the application of the Sharia jurisprudence on women and girls in personal status matters;  whereas this will lead to a rise in temporary marriages and legitimise child marriages;

     

    1. Emphasises that the unequal treatment of women in Iraq is determined and held in place by cultural norms, customs, tribal traditions and religious practices and that these unequal treatments of women are also reflected in both civil and penal law;

     

    1. Is deeply concerned about the consequences of mass migration from the MENA countries for the security of women across Europe;

     

    1. Notes that the European Union’s development policy in Iraq in this field has not led to the desired results and that the situation is only deteriorating; calls for development aid to Iraq to be linked more strictly to conditionalities, above all cooperation in the repatriation of Iraqis illegally staying in the European Union back to their home country; calls for all development aid to Iraq to be stopped if Iraq does not cooperate in the repatriation of Iraqis from the European Union back to their home country;

     

    1. Notes that in case C-646/21 regarding two sisters of Iraqi nationality, the European Court of Justice has ruled that the very identification with the fundamental value of equality between women and men during a stay in a Member State, constitutes a “reason for persecution”, capable of leading to recognition of refugee status; is worried that this will only encourage further migration;

     

    1. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission/High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the European External Action Service, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

     

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Dangerous escalation in the Middle East – P-001945/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-001945/2024
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Kostas Papadakis (NI), Lefteris Nikolaou-Alavanos (NI)

    Iran’s missile attack on Tel Aviv was an expected retaliatory move in response to Israeli brutality and marks an escalation in the military showdown between the two countries.

    Backed by the US, NATO and the EU, Israel is continuing its genocide against Palestinians, has occupied further territory in Gaza and the West Bank, has invaded the independent state of Lebanon and is continuing its killing spree against political leaders.

    The EU has organised ‘Aspides’, a dangerous military operation in the Red Sea, which the Greek Government is taking part in by sending a warship and hosting the operation headquarters in Larissa.

    How does the EU High Representative/Vice-President view:

    • 1.The fact that the EU military operation ‘Aspides’ provides a justification for the escalation of Israel’s savage project, contributes to the escalation of armed conflict in the wider Middle Eastern region and turns people in the region and Europeans into retaliation targets, with unpredictable consequences?
    • 2.The call for all support to Israel to be withdrawn, for the EU’s ‘Aspides’ operation to be terminated, for the Greek frigate and the other ships that joined the mission to be withdrawn and for a pull-out from the war in the Middle East?
    • 3.The fact that the EU continues to support Israel, citing its commitment to the latter’s security for the sake of stability in the Middle East, when this very same region is in severe turmoil precisely because of Israel’s aggression and the policy pursued by its Government, whose plans are supported by the EU?

    Submitted: 3.10.2024

    Last updated: 8 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law – B10-0092/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law

    Yannis Maniatis, Francisco Assis, Evin Incir, Nicola Zingaretti
    on behalf of the S&D Group

    B10‑0092/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on Iraq, notably the situation of women’s rights and the recent proposal to amend the Personal Status Law

    (2024/2858(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

    – having regard to its previous resolutions on Iraq,

     

    – having regard to Rule 150 of its Rules of Procedure,

     

    A. whereas women’s movements have played a key role in fighting political and religious extremism in Iraq;

     

    B. whereas the European Parliament awarded the 2016 Sakharov Prize to Nadia Murad and Lamiya Aji Bashar, two Yazidi women from Iraq, for their struggle against conflict-related sexual violence;

     

    C. whereas amendments to the Personal Status Law 188 of 1959 were presented in the Parliament of Iraq,

     

    D. whereas the proposed amendments constitute a serious reduction of rights in areas such as marriage, divorce, and child custody,

     

    E. whereas article 14 of the Constitution of Iraq states that “Iraqis are equal before the law without discrimination based on gender […]”,

     

    1. Expresses concern about the proposed amendments to the Personal Status Law 188 of 1959 in Iraq,

     

    2. Believes that, if enacted, the amended law will undermine the rights and equal treatment of women and children, in violation of UN conventions, including ICCPR, ICESCR, CEDAW, and CRC, to which Iraq is a state party; and failing to uphold such obligations will seriously erode core human rights and the protection of women and children,

     

    3. Recalls that States parties to the CEDAW Convention should adopt family or personal status laws that provide for equality irrespective of their religious or ethnic identity; and that in the absence of a unified family law, the system of personal status laws should provide for individual choice as to the application of religious law, ethnic custom or civil law,

     

    4. Reiterates CEDAW´s concerns that identity-based personal status laws and customs perpetuate discrimination against women and that multiple legal systems are in itself discriminatory against women,

     

    5. Calls on Iraqi political and religious leaders, parliament, judicial authorities, and social institutions, to consider the significant negative consequences of the proposed amendments and appeals to place the interests of women and children at the centre of deliberations,

     

    6. Urges Iraqi authorities to withdraw the proposed amendments to the Personal Status Law and to undertake a series of reforms, such as:

     

    a) a national action plan to eliminate child marriage,

     

    b) minimum age of marriage at 18 with no exceptions,

     

    c) criminalizing marital rape in all circumstances,

     

    d) a comprehensive domestic violence law, and acceding to CEDAW Optional Protocol,

     

    e) ensuring that people subjected to child or forced marriages can seek an annulment without undue burden placed on the victim,

     

    f) repealing the articles of the Iraqi Penal Code which give a husband a legal right to “punish” his wife “within limits prescribed by law or custom” and provide a reduced sentence for individuals who kill or assault their wives in the act of adultery,

     

    7. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the President of the Council and of the Commission, to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and to the Parliament of Iraq.

     

    MSG#

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION the case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye – B10-0097/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law

    Lucia Yar, Petras Auštrevičius, Malik Azmani, Helmut Brandstätter, Benoit Cassart, Olivier Chastel, Engin Eroglu, Svenja Hahn, Karin Karlsbro, Nathalie Loiseau, Jan‑Christoph Oetjen, Hilde Vautmans
    on behalf of the Renew Group

    B10‑0097/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye

    (2024/2856(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to the Türkiye’s international legal obligations and to its own domestic constitutional and legal stipulations to uphold the rule of law, respect for due process protect human rights;

     having regard to Rule 150 of the Rules of Procedure;

    A. whereas the 20 month prison sentence against journalist Bülent Mumay was upheld in an appeal court on 20th August;

    B. whereas the charges against Mumay focus on his alleged “illegally obtaining or disseminating personal data”,  and constitutes an attempt to suppress press freedom and freedom of expression in Türkiye;

    C. whereas on May 20, 2024, Turkish court further censored Mumay with the removal of his tweets and blocking access to news reports;

    D. whereas the process against Mumay is in line with the broader effort of the Turkish government’s to intimidate independent journalists through legal threats, censorship, and financial pressure, including those residing abroad, thereby undermining democratic discourse and accountability in the country; whereas the Turkish government has closed dozens of media outlets, routinely blocks online articles, is reported to control 85% of national media; whereas it passed a so-called “disinformation law” in 2022 and is reportedly planning to introduce a “foreign agent law” by the end of 2024, further undermining the freedom of press;

    E. whereas Türkiye as a long-standing member of the Council of Europe is expected to apply to the highest democratic standards and practices, including the press freedom and freedom of expression;

    1. condemns the prison sentence of Bülent Mumay not only as a serious infringement of his personal rights but also on the wider respect for press freedom and freedom of speech in Türkiye and urges the Turkish authorities to review his case and uphold the respect for human rights, the rule of law including the fundamental freedoms and the freedom of speech;

    2. calls on the Turkish government to end the systematic targeting of journalists and reiterates its profound concern at the on-going deterioration in press freedom in Türkiye as per the official records of independent organisations dedicated to protect journalists such as Reporters Without Borders (RSF) and the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ); condemns the use of arbitrary detention, judicial and administrative harassment, censorship, and financial coercion as the means of curbing investigative journalism;

    3. express full solidarity with Bülent Mumay and the other journalists, who also have been prosecuted, jailed or faced other forms of intimidation; urges Türkiye to stop deporting exiled Syrian journalists to their country of origin where they face grave danger;

    4. points out that this decision  reconfirms the authoritarian character of the current political leadership in Türkiye, which imposes a violent crackdown of political opponents, fundamental rights activists and minorities and shows the lack of willingness of the government to make real reforms in the field of fundamental rights and rule of law;

    5. instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, Commission, HRVP, and the President, Government and Parliament of Turkey and asks for this resolution to be translated into Turkish language.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION The case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye – B10-0095/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    with request for inclusion in the agenda for a debate on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law

    B10‑0095/2024

    Motion for a European Parliament resolution on the case of Bülent Mumay in Türkiye

    (2024/2856(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to Rule 150 of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas on 6 May 2023, journalist Bülent Mumay was sentenced to 20 months in prison for his social media posts on alleged money laundering schemes; whereas on 20 August 2024, an appeal court upheld the conviction; whereas Mumay’s remaining legal recourse is an individual application to the Constitutional Court;

    B. whereas Mumay’s case is part of a broader pattern of judicial harassment, intimidation, censorship and financial coercion targeting independent media and journalists; whereas on August 26, 82 X accounts operated by Kurdish politicians, journalists and media houses were blocked by a court for “making terrorist propaganda”; whereas 90% of the national media are under government control;

    1. Condemns the sentence of Bülent Mumay as well as the judicial harassment, intimidation, censorship and financial coercion faced by independent media and journalists; calls on Turkish authorities to end all harassment and protect independent journalists and guarantee the right to information in the country;

    2. Deplores the serious backsliding on fundamental freedoms and human rights in Türkiye and the continued erosion of democracy and the rule of law;

    3. Urges the authorities to put an end to the repression of political opponents, human rights defenders, civil servants, journalists, writers and academics; calls for the immediate and unconditional release of all people arbitrarily detained such as Figen Yüksekdağ, Selahattin Demirtaş, Osman Kavala, Çiğdem Mater, Mine Özerden, Can Atalay, and Tayfun Kahraman, and that the charges against them be immediately dropped or cancelled; calls to cease the judicial persecution against Hakan Altınay, Mücella Yapıcı and Yiğit Ali Ekmekçi, ahead of their next hearing on 9 October 2024;

    4. Calls on Turkish authorities to put an end to the systematic repression against opposition voices including HDP;

    5. Strongly condemns the use of the justice system for political purposes; requires to ensure the independence of the judiciary, and to guarantee the right to due process; calls to hold accountable those violating press freedom in the country;

    6. Urges the authorities to ensure that existing legislation – in particular the anti-terror Law, the Criminal Code, the law on assemblies and demonstrations and the law on disinformation– and protected communication in messenger services and free communication in social media , is revised to comply with international standards;

    7. Requires to the Council to ensure that full implementation by Türkiye of its rule of law and fundamental rights obligations be an integral part of the EU-Türkiye relationship; in that sense, condemns that despite the continued erosion of democracy and the rule of law, the EU has announced further financial support to Türkiye for restrictions on the entry of refugees and migrants to the EU; reiterates that Human Rights should not be undermined by migration management, commercial interests or counter-terrorism actions;

    8. Calls on the EU Member States to simplify the procedure for Turkish journalists to obtain Schengen visas;

    9. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the EU institutions, Member States, and the Turkish authorities.

    MIL OSI Europe News