Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI: Sparkle Revolution Expands Internationally, Bringing Mindfulness to English-Speaking Markets

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Denver, CO , May 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Sparkle Revolution, the innovative app designed to promote daily mindfulness and gratitude, has announced its expansion into international markets. Previously available only in the United States, the app will now be accessible in English-speaking countries including the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

    Carri Norton and Ron Butterworth

    The expansion comes in response to growing demand for accessible, digital tools that foster positive mental habits and well-being. “We’ve seen how transformative mindfulness can be for our users in the U.S., and we’re thrilled to extend that opportunity to users across the globe,” said Carri Norton, CEO of Sparkle Revolution. “This expansion is a crucial step in fulfilling our mission of spreading gratitude, awareness, and positivity worldwide.”

    Sparkle Revolution’s unique approach is rooted in the concept of “micro-mindfulness,” where users engage in short, intentional moments of reflection and gratitude. The app delivers daily prompts and activities designed to cultivate mindfulness habits that fit seamlessly into even the busiest of schedules. “Our goal is to make mindfulness accessible to everyone, regardless of location or lifestyle,” added Ron Butterworth, Co-Founder of Sparkle Revolution. “Expanding into new markets allows us to bring these powerful practices to more people, helping them live with greater intention and positivity.”

    “The idea for Sparkle Revolution came from our personal journey of integrating gratitude and mindfulness into everyday life,” Carri shared during a recent interview on the Wantrepreneur to Entrepreneur Podcast. “We wanted to create something that would remind people, even in the chaos of daily life, to stop, breathe, and appreciate what they have.” 

    Ron, Carri’s co-founder and husband, echoed this sentiment: “We are incredibly excited to see Sparkle Revolution reach more hands, more hearts, and more lives around the world.”

    Global Expansion Focuses on Community and Connection

    With its international rollout, Sparkle Revolution aims to build communities centered around mindfulness and personal growth. Users in new markets will have access to the same features that have resonated with American users: daily gratitude prompts, mindful journaling exercises, and positive affirmations.

    “We want Sparkle Revolution to be more than just an app – it’s a movement towards collective mindfulness and connection,” said Carri. “The expansion marks the beginning of that global journey.”

    To support its future growth, Sparkle Revolution plans to integrate deeper with industry professionals and end users alike. “We envision Sparkle Revolution as a catalyst for mindfulness communities across the globe,” Ron shared. “By collaborating with local wellness centers, meditation guides, and mindfulness coaches, we can tailor experiences that resonate deeply for each individual.”

    Sparkle Revolution’s commitment to accessibility is reflected in its pricing model, which remains competitive and inclusive. The app offers a generous 14-day full-featured free trial, and affordable monthly or annual subscription options. “We believe mindfulness should be available to everyone,” Carri added. “That’s why we’ve designed Sparkle Revolution to be both affordable and impactful.”

    About Sparkle Revolution

    Founded by tech entrepreneurs Carri Norton and Ron Butterworth, Sparkle Revolution is dedicated to integrating mindfulness and gratitude into everyday life. Through its mobile app, Sparkle Revolution empowers users to engage in daily practices that enhance mental clarity and foster a more positive outlook. For more information, visit Sparkle Revolution.

    Press inquiries

    Sparkle Revolution
    https://sparklerevolution.com/
    Carri Norton
    carri@sparklerevolution.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: MSF launches large hepatitis C campaign in Cox’s Bazar refugee camps

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    • MSF has begun a large-scale “test and treat” campaign for hepatitis C in the Cox’s Bazar refugee camps in Bangladesh, aiming to treat 30,000 people by the end of 2026.
    • Addressing the widespread hepatitis C epidemic among the Rohingya in the camps is challenging, considering the limited availability of care in the camps.
    • The campaign will include research to analyse challenges and propose solutions for testing and treating hepatitis C.

    COX’S BAZAR, BANGLADESH – To address concerningly high levels of hepatitis C in the Rohingya refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, 30,000 people will receive care by the end of 2026 as Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) significantly expands our treatment programmes. The initiative improves access to hepatitis C care for a group of stateless people who are particularly exposed to this curable, but potentially fatal, disease. MSF is establishing three specialised hepatitis C treatment centres within existing health facilities inside the camps, as part of a “test and treat” campaign covering an estimated third of all people living with hepatitis C in the camps.

    Between October 2020 and December 2024, MSF had treated over 10,000 people for hepatitis C at our clinics at Jamtoli and Hospital on the Hill. However, a 2023 MSF study published last month in The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology found that nearly one in five adults –an estimated 86,000 people– are living with chronic active infection, highlighting the urgent need for a more robust response.

    MSF nurses are collecting blood samples from patients in the Rohingya refugee camps using rapid diagnostic tests as part of a hepatitis C “test and treat” campaign. Bangladesh, April 2025.
    Tania Sultana/MSF

    “Access to hepatitis C care in the camps, where more than a million refugees have been living for the past eight years, has been extremely limited,” says Dr Wasim Firuz, MSF deputy medical coordinator. “Treating hepatitis C is not part of the package of healthcare provided by over-stretched healthcare facilities. People are also not allowed to freely leave the camps to access healthcare, and even if they could, it’s unlikely they would be able to afford the cost of treatment.”

    Harsh living conditions in the overcrowded camps, a lack of access to or reduced provision of healthcare, and a lack of legal status which severely restricts their basic rights, have made Rohingya refugees more vulnerable to infections – including hepatitis C – in Myanmar and Bangladesh. Our survey found that exposure to unsafe medical practices for decades, such as therapeutic injections, could be the main reason for the transmission of this bloodborne disease within the camps.

    Our scaled-up programme in response sees teams conducting systematic community-based screening to proactively identify people with hepatitis C, a disease that does not show any signs or symptoms in its first phase. Rapid testing is followed by laboratory confirmation at the newly established treatment centres in Balukhali, Jamtoli, and at Hospital on the Hill. We are also implementing a comprehensive healthcare awareness campaign, which includes providing drugs for hepatitis C treatment and sharing prevention messages and treatment adherence counselling to adults.

    “In the absence of other alternatives to hepatitis C care for tens of thousands of people in the camps, we are undertaking this substantial increase in our treatment capacity,” says Dr Firuz. “Our goal is to reach 30,000 people with curative care by the end of 2026. This expansion represents a vital step towards preventing the spread of hepatitis C, especially to younger generations.” 

    Addressing this widespread hepatitis C epidemic nonetheless presents considerable challenges within the limited capacity of the overall health response in the camps. MSF will be conducting research to analyse such challenges and bring about solutions as part of our response.

    “While we are scaling up efforts and working in coordination with other organisations, the limitations within the health response, including insufficient staffing, equipment, and resources among partners, present a significant obstacle,” says Dr Firuz. “Our campaign is temporary and will not eradicate hepatitis C in the camps. Attention to hepatitis C must continue during and after the end of this campaign. We again call on other health partners and the international community to prioritise building a comprehensive strategy, to reduce the devastating impact of this disease on this community.”

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM’s remarks at press conference on Diego Garcia: 22 May 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Speech

    PM’s remarks at press conference on Diego Garcia: 22 May 2025

    PM’s remarks at his press conference on Diego Garcia.

    A few moments ago…

    I signed a deal…

    To secure the joint UK-US base on Diego Garcia.

    This is absolutely vital…

    For our defence and intelligence…

    And therefore –

    For the safety and security of the British people.

    The full assessment of why this is so important is highly classified.

    But I want to speak as frankly as I can. 

    The strategic location of this base is of the utmost significance to Britain.

    From deploying aircraft to defeat terrorists in Iraq and Afghanistan…

    To anticipating threats in the Red Sea and the Indo-Pacific…

    The base is right at the foundation of our security and safety at home.

    It has helped us to…

    Disrupt threats to the UK…

    Support counter terror operations against Islamic State…

    And to reduce the risk to brave British and American servicemen and servicewomen. 

    The base will help protect the safe passage of our Carrier Strike Group as it goes through the Middle East.

    It enables rapid deployment across the Middle East, East Africa, and South Asia…

    It helps combat some of the most challenging threats we face,

    Including from terrorism and hostile states…

    And its location creates real military advantage across the Indo-Pacific.

    The base gives the UK and the US access to unique and vital capabilities – which benefit us directly.

    Many of these capabilities are secret, but they include…

    Airfield and deep-water port facilities…

    Facilities that support the worldwide operation of GPS…

    And the monitoring of objects in the earth’s orbit…

    And equipment to monitor the nuclear test ban treaty.

    The base is one of the most significant contributions we make to our security relationship with the United States –

    Which is critical for keeping Britain safe.

    Almost everything we do from the base is in partnership with the US.

    President Trump has welcomed the deal –

    Along with other allies.

    Because they see the strategic importance of this base –

    And that we cannot cede this ground to others who would seek to do us harm.

    And let me be clear – 

    We had to act now…

    Because the base was under threat.

    The courts have already made decisions which undermine our position.

    And if Mauritius takes us to court again…

    The UK’s longstanding legal view…

    Is that we would not have a realistic prospect of success…

    And would likely face a Provisional Measures Order within a matter of weeks.

    But this is not just about international law.

    This is about the operation of the base.

    Even if we chose to ignore judgments made against us…

    International organisations and other countries would act on them.

    And that would undermine the operation of the base –

    Causing us to lose this unique capability.

    One example of this is the electromagnetic spectrum.

    Countries have the right to manage this spectrum as they wish within their borders…

    A right that’s recognised in regulations…

    And overseen in the International Telecommunication Union.

    The use of spectrum is key to understand and anticipate those who seek to do us harm.

    If our right to control it is put into doubt…

    We would lose the first line of defence against other countries who wish to interfere and disrupt this capability…

    Rendering it practically useless.

    In addition – if we do not agree this deal…

    The legal situation would mean that…

    We would not be able to prevent China…

    Or any other nation…

    Setting up their own bases on the outer islands,

    Or carrying out joint exercises near our base.

    We would have to explain to you – the British people –

    And to our allies…

    That we had lost control of this vital asset.

    No responsible government could let that happen.

    So there is no alternative –

    But to act –

    In Britain’s national interest.

    By agreeing to this deal now – on our terms –

    We are securing strong protections, including from malign influence…

    That will allow the base to operate well into the next century…

    Helping to keep us safe for generations to come.

    Other approaches to secure the base have been tried over the years –

    And they have failed.

    [political content redacted]

    Now there is obviously a cost to maintaining such a valuable asset.

    We pay for our other military bases.

    Allies like the US and France do the same.

    This cost is part and parcel of using Britain’s global reach to keep us safe at home… 

    And it will be less than cost of running one aircraft carrier for a year.

    *

    Today’s agreement is the only way to maintain the base in the long term.

    There is no alternative.

    We will never gamble with national security.

    So we have acted –

    To secure our national interest…

    To strengthen our national security –

    And to protect the British people for many years to come.

    Thank you.

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Strengthen powers to bring empty homes back into use

    Source: Scottish Greens

    Scottish Greens demand action on empty homes

    The Scottish Greens have called on the Scottish Government to adopt stronger measures to tackle Scotland’s housing crisis by backing powers that would allow local authorities to bring long-term empty and derelict homes back into productive use.

    The Greens’ proposal has been tabled as an amendment to the Housing Bill, which is currently progressing through the Scottish Parliament.
    Scottish Government statistics show that 31,596 homes in Scotland were classified as long-term empty, out of a total of 43,538 properties empty for more than 6 months. This represents 73% of the total number of empty homes.

    Speaking in today’s Ministerial Statement on the Government’s response to the Housing Emergency, Maggie Chapman MSP asked the Cabinet Secretary for Social Justice Shirley Anne Sommerville, whether she would support proposals to bring vacant or derelict properties back into use for housing.

    The Cabinet Secretary said she would consider Ms Chapman’s proposals given the seriousness of the issue.

    This latest push builds on the Scottish Greens’ longstanding commitment to land and housing reform after they were previously successful in the implementation of Compulsory Purchase Orders.

    Commenting, Scottish Greens MSP Maggie Chapman said:

    “The Scottish Parliament accepts that we are in the midst of a housing emergency, it’s now time they started acting like it. Thousands of homes and plots of land are sitting empty or derelict. These amendments are about making significant changes the housing inequality which blights Scotland and puts homes back into the hands of people who need them.

    “It would be a vital step toward a fairer, more sustainable housing system. It is a long-overdue reform that can help alleviate housing pressures and support community regeneration. The amendments will build on Compulsory Purchase Orders, crucially allowing for greater flexibility in who the final buyer or tenant might be.

    “These proposals are rooted in recommendations from the Scottish Land Commission and are backed by homelessness charities and housing justice organisations. They would play a vital role in taking power back from the negligent super-rich who are hoarding properties and contributing to the significant struggles we are seeing for many to find safe and affordable accommodation.

    “If the SNP don’t act now by strengthening our hand in tackling housing inequality, then prior progress will stall. It is not the time for half-measures, it is time to make real change to people’s lives.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM call with President El-Sisi of Egypt: 22 May 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    PM call with President El-Sisi of Egypt: 22 May 2025

    The Prime Minister spoke to Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi this afternoon.

    The Prime Minister spoke to President of Egypt Abdel Fattah El-Sisi today.

    The leaders discussed the deeply concerning developments in Gaza, agreeing that restrictions on humanitarian aid must be lifted.

    The Prime Minister pressed for the urgent release of British national Alaa Abd El-Fattah so that he can be reunited with his family. He underlined how important it is to him to bring an end to the anguish Alaa and his family have faced.

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Global: Golden Dome: what Trump should learn from Reagan’s ‘Star Wars’ missile defence system plan

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Matthew Powell, Teaching Fellow in Strategic and Air Power Studies, University of Portsmouth

    Donald Trump has unveiled plans for a new “next-generation” missile defence system which he says will by “capable even of intercepting missiles launched from the other side of the world, or launched from space”. The US president says “Golden Dome”, which is reportedly partly inspired by Israel’s Iron Dome system that protects the country from missile attacks, will be operational by the end of his current four-year term of office.

    But critics say that it’s much harder to design a defence system to protect a land mass the size of the United States. This is particularly the case in an era characterised by the threat from hypersonic missiles, such as those used by Russia against Ukraine, as well as attacks from space.

    Ever since the first aerial attacks on civilian populations, there have been increasing calls to provide systems that can defend and destroy the potential for an adversary to attack people, governments and infrastructure.

    This developed from relatively basic defence systems, such as those employed by the UK from 1917 to protect London and the south-east of England from attack during the first world war, which developed further to provide a relatively large degree of protection during the Battle of Britain in the summer and autumn of 1940.


    Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


    During the cold war, which followed the dropping of atomic bombs on Japan in 1945, research accelerated globally into ways of providing greater protection against nuclear attack. The most eye-catching of these ideas was the announcement by Ronald Reagan in 1983 of plans to develop a massive (and hugely expensive) land and space-based missile defence system.

    The project, officially called the Strategic Defence Initiative quickly became known colloquially – if slightly mockingly – as “Star Wars”.

    The concept behind the missile defence system was that it would provide a way of effectively making nuclear weapons obsolete. Through the application of a defensive system that incorporated both land and space-based missiles, it was believed that any nuclear warhead fired would be destroyed before it was able to re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere.

    This would not only prevent intercontinental ballistic missiles from striking their intended target, but their destruction so high above the Earth would mean that they would not pose a threat in terms of nuclear radiation and fallout.

    It’s important to note that what was announced by Reagan in March 1983 was not about the development, construction or application of an actual defensive system. It was about funding research into the technologies that would be required for such a system.

    Reagan claimed this was a move to create a more peaceful world by making nuclear weapons effectively obsolete. But it was certainly not seen this way in Moscow.

    It was also something of a half truth. The move should be seen within the wider context of cold war relations and developments. The Reagan administration was seeking to bring the Soviet Union to the negotiating table to discuss reductions in strategic weapons.

    By developing a defensive system that would make strategic nuclear weapons almost obsolete, it was hoped this would force the hand of the Soviets and effectively compel them to agree to talks.

    The ‘Star Wars’ era: Ronald Reagan hoped his planned missile defence system would force the USSR to the negotiating table. He was right.
    Yuryi Abramochkin/RIA Novosti archive., CC BY

    But at the same time, as far as the decision-makers in the Kremlin were concerned, such a system – if developed and deployed – would give the United States a colossal strategic advantage. By the mid-1980s, it was highly unlikely that the Soviets could ever afford the investment in research and development and production capabilities to design their own system. This would mean that the Soviet Union was now highly vulnerable to a nuclear attack, while the US would be protected.

    This would place the United States in a similar position to that which it had enjoyed between 1945 and 1949, when it was the only nation that had the ability launch nuclear weapons. The theory of mutually assured destruction would fall almost overnight, meaning that the US had very little to fear from launching a nuclear attack, as any Soviet response would be futile.

    Given the potential for nuclear blackmail by the all-powerful US, it might cause the Kremlin to consider launching a pre-emptive strike against the US before such a system could be developed or implemented. Rather than making the world a safer place and diminishing the place of nuclear weapons, the world would become more dangerous.

    Pie in the sky?

    The Strategic Defence Initiative never really got off the ground. The initial mockery from large parts of the public of the US hid many real challenges to the development of such a defensive system. The research and development aspect alone came with a very large price tag. This was largely out of step with Reagan’s ideas about small government and limited public spending.

    In order to fund such a programme, money would have to be diverted from other domestic and social programmes, such as health and education. Despite the cold war context, this may well have risked unrest and protest from large swaths of the US population.

    The new technologies that were supposed to be developed as a part of this initiative were untested. It became evident that the only real way to test the efficacy and capability would be to expose the world to a nuclear attack and hope that the theoretical concepts that had been developed actually worked in practice.

    The Soviet Union also found ways of countering the potential developments that may emerge from the Strategic Defence Initiative, making the system almost redundant before it had begun.

    Proposed defence systems, like the Strategic Defence Initiative or the Golden Dome, can appear to be a panacea to defensive worries caused by heavily armed adversaries. Announcements about their development can cause global headlines and speculation about what this means for relations between nations and the international system.

    Take a step back from the US president’s hype, however, and it’s clear that Golden Dome will be hugely expensive and challenging to operate. Moreover it will require significant capabilities that do not yet exist and have yet to be tested operationally.

    Matthew Powell does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Golden Dome: what Trump should learn from Reagan’s ‘Star Wars’ missile defence system plan – https://theconversation.com/golden-dome-what-trump-should-learn-from-reagans-star-wars-missile-defence-system-plan-257372

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Pope Leo XIV’s gratitude to the Pontifical Mission Societies: “Leaven of missionary zeal within the People of God”

    Source: Agenzia Fides – MIL OSI

    Thursday, 22 May 2025

    VaticanMedia

    Vatican City (Agenzia Fides) – The “world, wounded by war, violence and injustice” needs to hear the Gospel message of God’s love and to experience the reconciling power of Christ’s grace.” Therefore, today it is all the more urgent to “bring Christ to all people.” And the Pontifical Mission Societies (PMS) “are effectively the “primary means” of awakening missionary responsibility among all the baptized and supporting ecclesial communities in areas where the Church is young.” With these words, Pope Leo XIV expressed his personal gratitude to the network during an audience with the participants of the General Assembly of the Pontifical Mission Societies at the Vatican. The General Assembly is currently meeting in Rome at the International College of San Lorenzo da Brindisi (see Fides, 21/5/2025).A total of 115 national directors of the Pontifical Mission Societies from all five continents participated in the audience, along with the General Secretaries and staff of the international secretariats in Rome, under the leadership of Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle, Pro-Prefect of the Dicastery for Evangelization (Section for First Evangelization and the New Particular Churches). Also present were the Secretary of the Dicastery, Archbishop Fortunatus Nwachukwu, and the Adjunct Secretary, Archbishop Samuele Sangalli.Pope Leo and the Pontifical Mission SocietiesThe new Bishop of Rome knows the work of the Pontifical Mission Societies from his own experience (see Fides, 10/5/2025). Also in his address today, in which he referred to his many years of missionary experience in Peru, the Successor of Peter said that the work of the Pontifical Mission Societies “is indispensable to the Church’s mission of evangelization, as I can personally attest from my own pastoral experience in the years of my ministry serving in Peru.” Pope Leo also recalled the specific tasks of the four Missionary Societies that were born from the missionary creativity and “sensus fidei” of the People of God and have become, over time, an integral part of the Missionary Dicastery: the Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith, which – as the Pope recalled – “provides aid for pastoral and catechetical programmes, the building of new churches, healthcare, and educational needs in mission territories”; the Society of the Holy Childhood, which “provides support for Christian formation programmes for children, in addition to caring for their basic needs and protection”; and the Missionary Society of Saint Peter the Apostle, which “helps to cultivate missionary vocations, priestly and religious,” and the Pontifical Missionary Union, which is dedicated to “forming priests, religious men and women, and all the people of God for the Church’s missionary activity.”A worldwide network at the service of apostolic zeal”The promotion of apostolic zeal among the People of God ,” Pope Leo emphasized in his address, “remains an essential aspect of the Church’s renewal as envisioned by the Second Vatican Council, and is all the more urgent in our own day,” at a time when “as in the days after Pentecost, the Church, led by the Holy Spirit, pursues her journey through history with trust, joy and courage as she proclaims the name of Jesus and the salvation born of faith in the saving truth of the Gospel. The Pontifical Mission Societies,” Pope Leo reiterated, “are an important part of this great effort.”The Pope recalled the worldwide annual efforts of the Pontifical Mission Societies “in promoting World Mission Sunday on the second-to-last Sunday of October, which is of immense help to me in my solicitude for the Churches in areas which are under the care of the Dicastery for Evangelization.” He also asked the National Directors of the Pontifical Mission Societies, in particular, “to give priority to visiting dioceses, parishes and communities, and in this way to help the faithful to recognize the fundamental importance of the missions and supporting our brothers and sisters in those areas of our world where the Church is young and growing.”The Special Bond Between the Pontifical Mission Societies and the Successor of PeterIn his address, Pope Leo also highlighted “communion” and “universality” as the two “distinctive elements of your identity as Pontifical Mission Societies,” both of which emphasize the special bond between the Pontifical Mission Societies and the Successor of Peter.“As Societies committed to sharing in the missionary mandate of the Pope and the College of Bishops,” the Pope explained, “you are called to cultivate and further promote within your members the vision of the Church as the communion of believers, enlivened by the Holy Spirit, who enables us to enter into the perfect communion and harmony of the blessed Trinity. Indeed, it is in the Trinity that all things find their unity. This dimension of our Christian life and mission is close to my heart, and is reflected in the words of Saint Augustine that I chose for my episcopal service and now for my papal ministry: In Illo uno unum. Christ is our Saviour and in him we are one, a family of God, beyond the rich variety of our languages, cultures and experiences.”Leaven of “Missionary Zeal”The experience of communion “as members of the Body of Christ,” according to the Pope, “naturally opens us to the universal dimension of the Church’s mission of evangelization, and inspires us to transcend the confines of our individual parishes, dioceses and nations, in order to share with every nation and people the surpassing richness of the knowledge of Jesus Christ.” And precisely “a renewed focus on the Church’s unity and universality corresponds precisely to the authentic charism of the Pontifical Mission Societies.” This charism,” added the Bishop of Rome, “should inspire the process of renewal of the statutes that you have initiated,” on a path aimed at “strengthening the members of the Pontifical Societies throughout the world in their vocation to be a leaven of missionary zeal within the People of God.” (GV) (Agenzia Fides, 22/5/2025)
    Share:

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI: WISeKey Updates on the Negotiations to Acquire 100% of IC’ALPS

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WISeKey Updates on the Negotiations to Acquire 100% of IC’ALPS

    Geneva, Switzerland – May 22, 2025 – Ad-Hoc announcement pursuant to Art. 53 of SIX Listing Rules – WISeKey International Holding Ltd (NASDAQ: WKEY / SIX: WIHN) (“WISeKey” or “the Company”), a global leader in cybersecurity, digital identity, and IoT technologies, today shares an update on the exclusive negotiations entered into by its subsidiary, SEALSQ Corp (“SEALSQ”), a leading developer and provider of Semiconductors, PKI, and Post-Quantum technology hardware and software solutions, to acquire 100% of the share capital and voting rights of IC’ALPS SAS (“IC’ALPS”), an Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (“ASIC”) design and supply specialist based in Grenoble, France (“the Acquisition”).

    These exclusive negotiations result from the execution of a Letter of Intent with IC’ALPS and its shareholders (the “Sellers”). This proposed strategic Acquisition (subject to the signing of a Share Purchase Agreement and satisfaction of closing conditions) is expected to reinforce SEALSQ’s commitment to advancing its ASIC development to meet the growing demand in the sector and would add approximately 100 highly skilled staff based out of IC’ALPS’ current centers in Grenoble and Toulouse.

    SEALSQ and the Sellers have reached an agreement in principle to sign a Share Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) based on the following elements:

    • A fixed purchase price of EUR 12.5 million (subject to a ‘No Leakage’ undertaking clause) comprised of EUR 10 million consideration payable in cash and EUR 2.5 million consideration to be paid to one of the Sellers in fully paid and non-assessable Ordinary Shares of SEALSQ, the number of which would be calculated based on the volume weighted average price of an Ordinary Share of SEALSQ on the Nasdaq Stock Market during the ninety trading days ending on the trading day immediately prior to the closing of the Acquisition.
    • An earn-out payment in Ordinary Shares of up to EUR 4 million in value based on IC’ALPS achieving revenue in excess of EUR 11 million in the twelve months ending on December 31, 2025 (revenue to be accounted for in accordance with US GAAP and audited by SEALSQ’s statutory auditors).
    • The Ordinary Shares of SEALSQ to be issued as part of the equity consideration would be subject to a mandatory holding period of one hundred and eighty days from their date of issuance, during which the relevant Seller would be restricted from selling, transferring, or otherwise disposing of the SEALSQ Ordinary Shares.
    • Conditions precedent to the closing of the Acquisition include, among others, approval of the Acquisition by the French Ministry of the Economy in accordance with articles L.151-3 and R.151-1 et seq of the French Financial and Monetary Code (code monétaire et financier).

    During the year ended December 31, 2024, based solely on the draft unaudited revenue of IC’ALPS provided to SEALSQ using French GAAP was EUR9,756,000 with a net loss of EUR2,016,000. In the previous year, the audited revenue of IC’ALPS, based solely on the audited revenue of IC’ALPS provided to SEALSQ, using French GAAP was EUR 8,465,000 with a net income of EUR318,000. As further detailed below, upon completion of the Acquisition, it is anticipated that SEALSQ would prepare full audited financial statements using US GAAP for both years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, and that this might lead to material adjustment to these numbers.

    We note that the net loss of IC’ALPS under French GAAP for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 included sales to SEALSQ in an amount of approximately EUR 615,000. Excluding the sales to SEALSQ, the net loss of IC’ALPS under French GAAP for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 would amount to a net loss in the amount of EUR (2,631,000), based on the draft unaudited revenue of IC’ALPS provided to SEALSQ. We note that the net income of IC’ALPS under French GAAP for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 included sales to SEALSQ in an amount of approximately EUR 1,168,000. Excluding the sales to SEALSQ, the net income of IC’ALPS under French GAAP for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 would amount to a net loss in the amount of EUR (850,000) based on the audited revenue of IC’ALPS provided to SEALSQ.

    Although the conversion of the financial information of IC’ALPS from French GAAP to US GAAP has not been initiated, we expect that material adjustments may arise upon conversion to US GAAP in relation to French GAAP based net sales, operating expenses and income tax income reflected in the IC’ALPS income statement for twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, and in relation to French GAAP based intangible assets, current liabilities, and pension and debt liabilities reflected in the balance sheet as at December 31, 2024 and 2023, as reflected in the numbers provided by IC’ALPS to SEALSQ and disclosed in the preceding paragraphs.

    About IC’ALPS:
    IC’ALPS is your one-stop-shop ASIC partner. Based in France (HQ in Grenoble, two design centers in Grenoble and Toulouse), the company provides customers with a complete offering for Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASIC) and Systems on Chip (SoC) development from circuit specification, mastering design in-house, up to the management of the entire production supply chain. Its 100+ engineers’ areas of expertise include analog, digital and mixed-signal circuits (sensor/MEMS interfaces, ultra-low power consumption, power management, high-resolution converters, high voltage, signal processing, ARM and RISC-V based multiprocessors architectures, hardware accelerators) on technologies from 0.18 µm down to 1.8 nm, and from multiple foundries (TSMC, Global Foundries, Tower Semiconductor, X-FAB, STMicroelectronics, Intel Foundry, etc.). The company is active worldwide in medical, industrial, automotive, IoT, IA, mil-aero, and digital identity & security sectors. IC’ALPS is ISO 9001:2015, ISO 13485:2016, EN 9100:2018, Common Criteria certified, IATF16949-ready, member of TSMC Design Center Alliance (DCA), Intel Foundry Accelerator Design Services Alliance and Value Chain Alliance (DSA & VCA), ams Osram Preferred Partner and X-FAB’s partner network.
    More information: www.icalps.com and  https://www.linkedin.com/company/ic-alps

    About SEALSQ:
    SEALSQ is a leading innovator in Post-Quantum Technology hardware and software solutions. Our technology seamlessly integrates Semiconductors, PKI (Public Key Infrastructure), and Provisioning Services, with a strategic emphasis on developing state-of-the-art Quantum Resistant Cryptography and Semiconductors designed to address the urgent security challenges posed by quantum computing. As quantum computers advance, traditional cryptographic methods like RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography (ECC) are increasingly vulnerable.

    SEALSQ is pioneering the development of Post-Quantum Semiconductors that provide robust, future-proof protection for sensitive data across a wide range of applications, including Multi-Factor Authentication tokens, Smart Energy, Medical and Healthcare Systems, Defense, IT Network Infrastructure, Automotive, and Industrial Automation and Control Systems. By embedding Post-Quantum Cryptography into our semiconductor solutions, SEALSQ ensures that organizations stay protected against quantum threats. Our products are engineered to safeguard critical systems, enhancing resilience and security across diverse industries.

    For more information on our Post-Quantum Semiconductors and security solutions, please visit www.sealsq.com.

    About WISeKey
    WISeKey International Holding Ltd (“WISeKey”, SIX: WIHN; Nasdaq: WKEY) is a global leader in cybersecurity, digital identity, and IoT solutions platform. It operates as a Swiss-based holding company through several operational subsidiaries, each dedicated to specific aspects of its technology portfolio. The subsidiaries include (i) SEALSQ Corp (Nasdaq: LAES), which focuses on semiconductors, PKI, and post-quantum technology products, (ii) WISeKey SA which specializes in RoT and PKI solutions for secure authentication and identification in IoT, Blockchain, and AI, (iii) WISeSat AG which focuses on space technology for secure satellite communication, specifically for IoT applications, (iv) WISe.ART Corp which focuses on trusted blockchain NFTs and operates the WISe.ART marketplace for secure NFT transactions, and (v) SEALCOIN AG which focuses on decentralized physical internet with DePIN technology and house the development of the SEALCOIN platform.

    Each subsidiary contributes to WISeKey’s mission of securing the internet while focusing on their respective areas of research and expertise. Their technologies seamlessly integrate into the comprehensive WISeKey platform. WISeKey secures digital identity ecosystems for individuals and objects using Blockchain, AI, and IoT technologies. With over 1.6 billion microchips deployed across various IoT sectors, WISeKey plays a vital role in securing the Internet of Everything. The company’s semiconductors generate valuable Big Data that, when analyzed with AI, enable predictive equipment failure prevention. Trusted by the OISTE/WISeKey cryptographic Root of Trust, WISeKey provides secure authentication and identification for IoT, Blockchain, and AI applications. The WISeKey Root of Trust ensures the integrity of online transactions between objects and people. For more information on WISeKey’s strategic direction and its subsidiary companies, please visit www.wisekey.com.

    Disclaimer

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This communication expressly or implicitly contains certain forward-looking statements concerning WISeKey International Holding Ltd and its business. Forward-looking statements include statements regarding our business strategy, financial performance, results of operations, market data, events or developments that we expect or anticipate will occur in the future, as well as any other statements which are not historical facts and can be identified by forward-looking words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “continue,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “should,” “will” and “would” or similar words. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, no assurance can be given that such expectations will prove to have been correct. These statements involve known and unknown risks and are based upon a number of assumptions and estimates which are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that, in our view, could cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements include the actual adjustments that arise upon conversion of the financial information of IC’ALPS to US GAAP in relation to net sales, operating expenses and income tax income in the income statement for twelve months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, and in relation to intangible assets, current liabilities, and pension and debt liabilities in the balance sheet as at December 31, 2024 and 2023, in comparison with the French GAAP ; the entering into of definitive documents, the authorization by French regulatory authorities and the successful closing of the Acquisition; ; and the risks discussed in WISeKey’s filings with the SEC. Risks and uncertainties are further described in reports filed by WISeKey with the SEC.

    This press release does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, and it does not constitute an offering prospectus within the meaning of the Swiss Financial Services Act (“FinSA”), the FinSa’s predecessor legislation or advertising within the meaning of the FinSA. Investors must rely on their own evaluation of WISeKey and its securities, including the merits and risks involved. Nothing contained herein is, or shall be relied on as, a promise or representation as to the future performance of WISeKey.

    Press and Investor Contacts

    WISeKey International Holding Ltd
    Company Contact:  Carlos Moreira
    Chairman & CEO
    Tel: +41 22 594 3000
    info@wisekey.com
    WISeKey Investor Relations (US) 
    The Equity Group Inc.
    Lena Cati
    Tel: +1 212 836-9611
    lcati@theequitygroup.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Culture Secretary speech at UK National Day Official Ceremony at World Expo Osaka 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    Culture Secretary speech at UK National Day Official Ceremony at World Expo Osaka 2025

    Culture Secretary speaks about UK National Day and the strength of the UK-Japan partnership at the World Expo in Osaka

    Your Imperial Highness, your excellency and esteemed guests. It is a great honour to be hosting the UK’s National Day celebrations here at Expo 2025 Osaka Kansai

    Let me start by offering my congratulations to the Government of Japan, the Expo Association and everyone involved in organising Expo 2025. In today’s world where many want to focus on differences and divisions, it is no mean feat to bring together over 150 countries with a shared goal of “designing future society for our lives.” I am very much looking forward to seeing more of this amazing Expo site in the course of today. 

    Expo 2025 is very much about a global conversation, and within that global conversation, the UK and Japan have a particularly strong partnership. Our bilateral relationship is the strongest it has been in decades, underpinned by our common values, shared view of the world and our close people-to-people links. As His Majesty the Emperor said on his State Visit to the UK in June last year, we are ‘friends like no other’.

    The UK has a long history with Expos – going back to 1851 when the first ever EXPO was held in London – and a long history with Japan, from the arrival of William Adams/Miura-Anjin in 1600 to the Choshu 5 travelling to Britain in the mid-19th century to learn about the Industrial Revolution which was transforming my country and the world. 

    The Japanese pioneers who travelled to Britain learnt much about our industrial prowess, bringing that technology back to Japan helping to transform Japan into the thriving, technologically advanced nation it is today. It is especially pertinent to reflect that one of those pioneers who ventured as far as Manchester went on to found the Osaka Chamber of Commerce, giving rise to Osaka’s tremendous growth. So our links are long and very relevant to this region. I am personally delighted as someone who was born in Manchester to see those links between Manchester and Osaka grow ever stronger. 

    It was the sharing of technology and ideas which drove the UK-Japan relationship then, and still drives it now. And it is that belief in the power of ideas to build the future that lies at the heart of the UK pavilion at Expo. The UK’s theme at Expo 2025 is Come Build The Future. It is about the power of small ideas to come together, as children do with building blocks, to create something magical and potentially world-changing. 

    We are a country of ideas that thrives on diversity, on a special mix of tradition and modernity. Our ancient universities drive world leading research, our whiskies and gins are still made to centuries old recipes, produced using cutting edge technology by a new generation of female distillers, our historic playhouses showcase the newest creative talents; and our small island is home to people from every country on the globe and has a capital city where over 300 languages are spoken. 

    Today our National Day offers a snapshot of that, underlining the message of partnership: the Edinburgh Military Tattoo will perform with taiko drummers, later today the BBC Planet Earth Live III concert will be performed by the Osaka based Century orchestra with a renowned UK conductor, and musicians from across the four nations of the UK will connect with new Japanese audiences.

    I said earlier that the UK-Japan partnership is stronger than ever. This is evident from our ever-deepening economic and trade ties, through CPTPP, our collaboration on the green agenda, in defence, security, and digital technologies. But today I want to draw attention to the powerful cultural and people-to-people connections between our countries which underpin that partnership. I want to salute the power of the creative industries, of our story-tellers, to bring people together to entertain and delight, and to cross divides of language and culture.

    Later today, as part of our National Day, we are bringing the Japanese premiere of BBC’s Planet Earth III Live in concert to the Expo Hall. The BBC will be well known to all of you – it has an average global reach of 450 million people across the world, bringing both independent news you can trust and award-winning television – both drama and documentary. Their BBC Earth natural world documentaries have been seen by a quarter of a billion people and have inspired positive environmental change across the world. Planet Earth, by transforming abstract climate data into personal, emotional experiences, has motivated viewers to care and take action to help shape a sustainable future.  Again, well aligned with our UK pavilion theme and that of Expo 2025.

    For a partnership to flourish you need to bring not only ideas but also people together. That is why later today I shall be announcing a new form of UK-Japan partnership which focuses on that very idea of connection, of bringing people together. The UK and Japan have been connecting for hundreds of years. We want to make sure we continue to do that into the future too. We hope young – and old – visiting Expo 2025 and our pavilion will be inspired to connect globally and to seek out new ideas and new partners. 

    To make progress towards the SDGs and tackle the global challenges we all face, we need to come together to share our ideas, to use them as the building blocks of a better future. The UK is committed to doing that, to doing that in partnership with others and is delighted to be here at Expo 2025 to take that partnership still further.

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Round table “Cooperation in China-Central Asia format” held in Bishkek

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BISHKEK, May 22 /Xinhua/ — A roundtable discussion on “Cooperation in the China-Central Asia Format” was held in the capital of Kyrgyzstan, Bishkek, on Thursday. The event was organized by the Chinese Embassy jointly with the Institute of World Politics of Kyrgyzstan.

    According to the Chinese embassy, more than 50 people took part in the event, including the Chinese Ambassador to Kyrgyzstan Liu Jiangping, the State Secretary of Kyrgyzstan Marat Imankulov, representatives of the scientific community and the media.

    In her keynote speech, Liu Jiangping spoke in detail about the fruitful results of cooperation between China and Central Asian countries, and also revealed the importance of the China-Central Asia cooperation mechanism.

    The ambassador stated that in the current complex and unstable international situation, China, together with the Central Asian countries, intends to effectively implement the agreements reached by the heads of the six states, improve and strengthen the China-Central Asia cooperation mechanism, deepen the joint construction of the Belt and Road and cooperation in all areas, and promote the building of a community with a shared future for China and the Central Asian countries.

    M. Imankulov and other participants of the round table in their speeches highly praised the achievements of cooperation between the Central Asian states and China, noting that the “China-Central Asia” cooperation mechanism will give a powerful impetus to comprehensive interaction between China and the countries of the region and will become a model of mutually beneficial multilateral partnership.

    Scholars present at the event spoke on cooperation in security, investment, connectivity, education and culture. Liu Jiangping answered all the questions asked of her in detail. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Security: UPDATE: Man arrested following stabbing in Brent

    Source: United Kingdom London Metropolitan Police

    Detectives investigating the death of a 26-year-old man in Brent have made an arrest.

    On Thursday, 22 May, officers arrested a man in his 20s, from Barnet, on suspicion of murder. He remains in custody.

    Ali Faris Muhammad, who lived in Harrow, sadly died following an altercation in the early hours of Sunday, 18 May.

    At 03:31hrs, police were called to reports of the incident in Kingsbury Road, NW9.

    Ali was taken to hospital with a stab wound. Despite the best efforts of medical staff, he died.

    His next of kin are being supported by specially trained officers.

    An investigation is ongoing.

    Detective Chief Inspector Allam Bhangoo, who is leading the investigation, said:

    “Our thoughts are with Ali’s family and loved ones. They have asked for their privacy to be respected at this difficult time.

    “Our team of detectives and forensic specialists are working at pace to establish the full circumstances that led to his tragic death. We urge anyone who witnessed the incident, or who has any information that could assist us, to come forward as soon as possible.

    “We understand this incident may cause concern within the Kingsbury community, and we’re grateful for their continued patience and co-operation as we carry out our investigation.”

    Anyone who can help is asked to call police on 101, quoting reference: 1052/18May. Information can also be provided anonymously to Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

    Or please visit the Major Incident Police Portal (MIPP) – https://mipp.police.uk/operation/01MPS25X74-PO1

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Council pledges to protect under-threat heritage building

    Source: City of Stoke-on-Trent

    Published: Thursday, 22nd May 2025

    Efforts are being stepped up to safeguard the long-term future of an historic grade II listed building in Stoke-on-Trent.

    The city council is moving to protect the former Burslem Indoor Market building, in Queen Street, which is in an extremely poor condition.

    The building is in desperate need of emergency safeguarding works to ensure that it is safe, watertight and will not deteriorate any further.

    Now Stoke-on-Trent City Council is seeking grant funding from Historic England to enable it to carry out emergency repairs to the roof, to stop the building falling into further disrepair.

    The council previously secured an emergency repair package made up of £318,000 from Historic England and £1.3 million from local Levelling Up Partnership funds to pay for safeguarding works at a number of historic buildings in Burslem.

    Now it is looking to apply for further support from Historic England in the form of a grant of up to £1 million.

    If successful, the additional money will go towards emergency repair works to the roof of the Burslem Indoor Market building, along with refurbishment of the building’s exterior.

    Stoke-on-Trent City Council’s Cabinet is being asked to agree to procure contractors to undertake the works, subject to a successful grant application, at a meeting on Tuesday 27 May.

    Councillor Jane Ashworth, leader of Stoke-on-Trent City Council, said: “Our heritage buildings aren’t just the symbol of our proud past – they are part of our rich cultural heritage and can drive tourism and economic growth.

    “We are absolutely committed to doing everything we can to protect them. That means working in partnership with local organisations and businesses, Historic England – and the government, too.

    “The Burslem Indoor Market building is deteriorating quickly and investment now could potentially save far greater expenditure in the future – and more importantly, prevent it from falling into further disrepair.”

    The grade II listed indoor market opened in 1879 as a symbol of the city’s wealth and pride during the Victorian era. At its height it boasted 90 stalls – but that had dropped to 14 by the time the market closed in 2003 after the ceiling collapsed.

    Cllr Ashworth added: “Stoke-on-Trent is currently facing a heritage crisis. Many of our historic buildings are in a poor state of repair but we are spearheading efforts to identify funding streams, and potential new uses, to bring these buildings back to life.

    “We want to protect our heritage assets and safeguard them for the benefit of our residents now and for future generations.”

    In addition to Burslem Indoor Market, Stoke-on-Trent City Council is continuing to explore a number of options for the grade II* listed Wedgwood Institute which has fallen into disuse, due partly to water leaking in and causing damage.

    This includes using potential funds from the Schools Capital Programme for the extensive refurbishment of each of the rooms on the ground floor of the building so it can be used for education purposes in the future.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: York welcomes new Lord Mayor

    Source: City of York

    The new Lord Mayor of York, Cllr Martin Rowley BEM.

    Published Thursday, 22 May 2025

    City of York Council’s Annual Council and Mayor-Making meeting has marked the appointment of a new Lord Mayor of York.

    Councillor Martin Rowley BEM has been officially appointed as the Right Honourable the Lord Mayor of York. 

    Councillor Rowley BEM is the newest holder of the highly prestigious and historic office, which is second only to the Lord Mayor of London in precedence, and dates back to at least 1217. The office was upgraded to Lord Mayor in 1389 by Richard II.

    Those attending the annual meeting today first welcomed the new Civic Party, before allocating seats and appointments to the Council and other outside bodies.

    Councillor Rowley BEM takes over the role of Lord Mayor from Councillor Margaret Wells.

    Paul Doughty joins the incoming Civic Party as the Sheriff of York, taking over from Fiona Fitzpatrick.

    Cllr Claire Douglas, Leader of City of York Council, said:

    “As always, it’s a pleasure to be part of this ancient tradition where we formally welcome our new Lord Mayor and Civic Party for the coming year.

    “I’d like to thank Cllr Wells and the outgoing Civic Party for their outstanding work and wish Cllr Rowley and the incoming Civic Party the very best as they represent our city, raise funds and awareness for important causes and engage with communities across York.”

    Cllr Martin Rowley BEM, Lord Mayor of York, said:

    It is an honour and a privilege to have been chosen as the next Lord Mayor of York, and I’d like to take this opportunity to thank Cllr Margaret Wells for all her hard work and dedication during her tenure as Lord Mayor.

    “Alongside my colleagues in the new Civic Party, I’m looking forward to stepping into this historic position and acting as an ambassador for this great city during what will certainly be a busy and exciting year for York.”

    The Civic Party for 2025/2026 is:

    • The Rt Hon the Lord Mayor of York, Councillor Martin Rowley BEM
    • Lady Mayoress Elizabeth Rowley
    • Sheriff of York, Paul Doughty
    • Sheriff’s Consort, David Smith.

    The Lord Mayor’s fundraising committee will be organising around the city during the civic year to raise money to support charities chosen by the Civic Party, and will be supported in that by the Two Ridings Community Foundation, which makes grants and give support to hundreds of community organisations which provide crucial services and life changing activities for local people across North and East Yorkshire.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: NHS pay awards 2025 to 2026: resident doctors

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 2

    Correspondence

    NHS pay awards 2025 to 2026: resident doctors

    The Department of Health and Social Care confirms a 5.4% pay rise for resident doctors, backdated to 1 April 2025.

    Applies to England

    Documents

    Details

    The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has accepted the recommendations of the independent pay review bodies to confirm the pay award for 2025 to 2026 for NHS resident doctors.

    See NHS pay award 2025 to 2026 details for:

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 May 2025

    Sign up for emails or print this page

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: NHS pay awards 2025 to 2026: Agenda for Change staff

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 2

    Correspondence

    NHS pay awards 2025 to 2026: Agenda for Change staff

    The Department of Health and Social Care confirms a 3.6% pay rise for NHS Agenda for Change (AfC) staff, backdated to 1 April 2025.

    Applies to England

    Documents

    Details

    The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has accepted the recommendations of the independent pay review bodies to confirm the pay award for 2025 to 2026 for NHS AfC staff including nurses, midwives, paramedics, porters, healthcare assistants and clerical workers.

    See NHS pay award 2025 to 2026 details for:

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 May 2025

    Sign up for emails or print this page

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: NHS pay awards 2025 to 2026: doctors and dentists

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 2

    Correspondence

    NHS pay awards 2025 to 2026: doctors and dentists

    The Department of Health and Social Care confirms a 4% pay rise for consultants, speciality doctors, specialists, GPs and dentists, backdated to 1 April 2025.

    Applies to England

    Documents

    Details

    The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has accepted the recommendations of the independent pay review bodies to confirm the pay award for 2025 to 2026 for NHS consultants, speciality doctors, specialists, GPs and dentists.

    See NHS pay award 2025 to 2026 details for:

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 May 2025

    Sign up for emails or print this page

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Defence Secretary oral statement on Diego Garcia

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments 3

    Oral statement to Parliament

    Defence Secretary oral statement on Diego Garcia

    Oral statement from the Defence Secretary John Healey on Diego Garcia.

    With permission, Mr Speaker, I wish to make a statement on the Diego Garcia Military Base. 

    For more than 50 years, the joint UK-US military base in Diego Garcia has been a launchpad to: 

    … defeat terrorists… 

    … prevent threats to our nation… 

    … and protect our economic security. 

    This base keeps Britain secure at home and strong abroad. 

    This afternoon, the Prime Minister has signed a Treaty with Prime Minister Ramgoolam of Mauritius which guarantees full continued UK control of Diego Garcia for the next 99 years and beyond. 

    I pay tribute to the UK’s negotiators… 

    … to the FCDO and MOD teams who supported them… 

    … and to the Mauritian officials who worked for two and a half years with the last government and this, to reach this agreement.   

    The Foreign Secretary has laid in the House today… 

    … the full Treaty text and his formal exchange of letters with the Foreign Minister of Mauritius that confirm the agreement and the financial arrangements between our two countries. 

    A Bill will be introduced soon to implement the Treaty. 

    There has been a great deal of misinformation about this Treaty [political content removed] – but the simple truth Mr Speaker, is that our national security rests on securing a deal that protects the operational sovereignty of this vital military installation. 

    By signing this Treaty – on our terms – my Right Honourable Friend the Prime Minister, has ensured the UK retains full control of Diego Garcia, throughout the next century and beyond. 

    It is a deal struck in the national interest… 

    … a deal that makes Britons today and generations to come, safer and more secure. 

    Mr Speaker, the importance of Diego Garcia cannot be overstated. 

    Some of the operations on our joint UK-US base are in the public domain.   

    Most – by necessity – are not.  

    But all the work conducted from Diego Garcia plays a crucial role in protecting: 

    … our nation … 

    … our Armed Forces … 

    … and our trade routes. 

    Mr Speaker, Diego Garcia is unique. 

    We do things there, that we simply could not do anywhere else.  

    Its airfield allows for strike operations and rapid deployments to the Middle East, East Africa and South Asia… 

    … its deepwater port supports missions from nuclear-powered submarines to our Carrier Strike Group… 

    … it hosts surveillance stations which disrupt terrorist attacks, protect satellites and provide global intelligence capabilities… 

    … and it projects UK-US military power into the Indo-Pacific to reinforce regional stability and security. 

    Mr Speaker, America is our closest security ally. 

    And continued use of this base is fundamental to maintaining the special strength of that relationship. 

    In fact, Diego Garcia is our nation’s most significant contribution to the UK-US security partnership that has kept us safe for nearly eighty years 

    As I have said, this is a joint military base and almost every operation conducted from it is done in partnership with the US. 

    This is why, this Treaty has the full-throated support from the US: 

    Secretary of State – Marco Rubio – has said: 

    This agreement secures the long term stable and effective operation of the joint US-UK military facility at Diego Garcia, which is critical to regional and global security.  

    And President Trump described the deal as “very long term” and “very strong”. 

    Mr Speaker, Diego Garcia also strengthens Britain’s economic security.  

    Over one-third of the world’s bulk cargo traffic and two-thirds of global oil shipments is transported through the Indian Ocean.  

    Our constant presence in these waters serves to safeguard trade routes, keeping the price of food and energy for Britons down here at home. 

    Diego Garcia is also the permanent location of critical Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban treaty monitoring equipment… 

    … a network that watches every moment of every day for evidence of nuclear testing to hold nuclear – and any would-be, nuclear powers – to account. 

    Diego Garcia is one of just four locations in the world to operate ground station antennas for the Global Positioning System… 

    … which everyone from astronauts, to motorists, to our military, rely on to navigate. 

    Mr Speaker, the loss of the Diego Garcia military base would now be unthinkable. 

    Yet, without action, without this deal, within weeks we could face losing legal rulings… 

    … and within just a few years the base would become inoperable. 

    Some have suggested simply ignoring international legal decisions. 

    But this is not just about international law.  

    This is about the direct impact of law on our ability to operate the base. 

    Rulings against us would mean we would be unable to prevent hostile nations setting up installations around Diego Garcia, on the outer islands or carrying out joint exercises near the base. 

    No deal means we could not guarantee the safe berth of our subs…  

    … patrol the waters around the base… 

    … control the airspace directly above…  

    … or protect the integrity of our communications systems. 

    Such developments would deeply damage the security interests of the UK and our allies. 

    It would be a dereliction of our first duty of government. 

    Agreeing this Treaty now – on our terms – means the UK retains full control over Diego Garcia. Now and for the next century. 

    We’ve laid before the house the full treaty and associated costings. 

    The [political content removed] frontbench – will see how we have toughened the terms of the deal they were doing so it does more now to guarantee the UK’s national security and national interests. 

    At a cost of less than 0.2 per cent of the annual defence budget, we have secured unrestricted access to and use of the base… 

    … as well as control over movement of all persons and goods on the base, and control of all communication and electronic systems. 

    Nothing can be built within a 24 nautical mile buffer zone without our say so. 

    We have secured an effective veto on all development in the Chagos archipelago.  

    And a strict ban will be imposed on foreign security forces operating on the outer islands.  

    All provisions that were not there in the draft agreement, that had been negotiated by the [political content removed] before the election.

    Mr Speaker, anyone who would abandon this deal, would abandon this base. They would weaken the security of the British people, and they would weaken the strength of the British Armed Forces 

    But… in signing this deal, a British flag will fly over the Diego Garcia base well into the next century… 

    … the relationship with our closest security ally will be strengthened… 

    … and our capacity to deter our adversaries and defend UK interests is secured for generations to come. 

    And as the world becomes more dangerous, Diego Garcia becomes more important. 

    This government will never compromise on our national security.  

    And with this deal, we’ve made Britain more secure at home and stronger abroad.

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: Banqup delivers 26% growth in organic subscription revenue in Q1 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Press Release – Regulated Information 

    La Hulpe, Belgium – 22 May 2025, 19:00 CET – REGULATED INFORMATION – Banqup Group SA, formerly Unifiedpost Group SA, (Euronext: UPG) (Banqup, Company), a leading provider of integrated business communications solutions, publishes its business update on the first quarter of 2025. 

    Key Highlights

    • Solid double-digit growth momentum in organic1 subscription revenue (+25,9% y/y)
    • Digital service revenue growth of +7,7% y/y driven by subscription and transaction revenue growth 
    • Focused on operational preparedness for key geographies with upcoming e-invoicing regulations
    • Divestment of 21 Grams on track, while portfolio rationalisation of non-digital services remains a priority
    • Reiterating FY 2025 guidance: ~25% organic subscription revenue growth and FCF2 positive by year-end
    • Appointment of our new Chief Revenue Officer, Chrystèle Dumont.

    Commenting on the Q1 2025 results, Nicolas de Beco, CEO, remarked: We have seen a solid start to the year. During the first quarter, we made good progress on organic subscription revenue growth, with performance already tracking our FY guidance. We continued to work on the divestments of non-core activities and enhancing operational efficiencies. Alongside this, developing our payment solutions remains a key focus. We also strengthened our leadership team, which is marked by the arrival of our new Chief Revenue Officer, who will play a key role in leveraging the Group’s digital solutions for compliance and efficiency. The effective change of the Company name to Banqup Group, which was approved at the AGM, also marks a step forward in the realignment of our business as a pure-play SaaS provider. We continue to actively engage with our customers and partners ahead of the upcoming e-invoicing regulations and remain confident in our ability to deliver against our growth targets for 2025.”

    Continuing operations3

    Thousands of EUR Q1 2025 Q1 2024 Change (%)
    Group revenue and income from client money 20.263 21.162 -4,2%
    Digital services revenue 11.526 10.701 +7,7%
               Subscription 3.645 3.157 +15,4%
                       of which Organic1 3.645 2.895 +25,9%
               Transaction 5.201 4.909 +6,0%
               Other 2.680 2.635 +1,7%
    Traditional communication services revenue 8.737 10.460 -16,5%

    Digital services business performance

    • Subscription revenue growth was primarily driven by the increase in e-invoicing subscriptions in Belgium, ahead of the incoming e-invoicing mandate set for 1 January 2026.
    • Transaction revenue increased +6,0% y/y as a result of client money, part of our embedded e-payment services, which amounted to €0,4m in Q1 2025 (compared to € 0,7m in FY 2024, reflecting a business that was launched in July 2024).

    Operational and leadership updates:

    • Appointed Chrystèle Dumont as Chief Revenue Officer, bringing her proven track record of strategic vision and operational excellence. Chrystèle will lead our revenue strategy and drive customer acquisition through partnerships, as we navigate the rapidly evolving e-invoicing landscape across Europe.
    • Focused on operational preparedness for European geographies with upcoming regulatory requirements (Benelux, France, Germany).

    Wholesale Identity Access business earn-out condition realised:
    On 17 December 2025, Banqup completed the divestment of its Wholesale Identity Access business in the Netherlands, as initially disclosed in its press release dated 26 August 2024. The sale included a potential earn-out payment of up to € 7,7 million, contingent upon achieving a defined financial milestone. On 30 April 2025, Banqup signed an agreement for a final earn-out of € 6,7 million for completion of the full transaction, with the effective payment date as of 6 May 2025.

    Banqup rebranding and enhanced governance approved at the Extraordinary General Meeting and Annual General Meeting on 20 May 2025:

    • The proposal to rebrand to Banqup across the Group was approved. The rebranding underpins our focus on core digital services and the positioning of our business as a pure-play SaaS provider, reinforcing our commitment to growth in e-invoicing and payment solutions.
    • The appointment of four new Board members was approved; for more details, see the previous announcement.

    Reconfirming FY 2025 Guidance (based on current reporting structure)

    • 25% increase in organic subscription revenue
    • FCF positive by year-end

    Financial Calendar:

    • 26 August 2025: Publication of the H1 2025 results (webcast)
    • 13 November 2025: Publication of the Q3 2025 business update

    Contact
    Alex Nicoll
    Investor Relations
    Banqup Group
    alex.nicoll@unifiedpost.com

     

    About Banqup Group

    Banqup Group delivers integrated cloud-based SaaS solutions to streamline business transactions across the entire lifecycle, from e-invoicing and e-payments to tax reporting. Banqup, our solution for businesses, unifies purchase-to-pay, order-to-cash, e-invoicing compliance, and e-payments into one secure platform, removing the complexity of juggling disconnected tools. eFaktura World, our solution for governments, is a comprehensive digital platform designed for tax administrations to implement e-invoicing and streamline both B2G and B2B tax reporting flows. To learn more about Banqup Group and our solutions, please visit our website: Unifiedpost Group | Global leaders in digital solutions

    Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements: The statements contained herein may include prospects, statements of future expectations, opinions, and other forward-looking statements in relation to the expected future performance of Banqup Group and the markets in which it is active. Such forward-looking statements are based on management’s current views and assumptions regarding future events. By nature, they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that appear justified at the time at which they are made but may not turn out to be accurate. Actual results, performance or events may, therefore, differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. Except as required by applicable law, Banqup Group does not undertake any obligation to update, clarify or correct any forward-looking statements contained in this press release in light of new information, future events or otherwise and disclaims any liability in respect hereto. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.

     


    1 Organic revenue excludes revenue from FitekIN/ONEA (divestment closed on 5 July 2024) in the comparative figures

    2 Free cash flow is defined as net income (i) plus non-cash items in the income statement, (ii) minus cash out for IFRS 16 adjustments, (iii) minus capital expenditure, (iv) minus reimbursement on loans and leasing for the reporting period

    3 Excludes discontinued operations: 21 Grams.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Meeting with the Prime Minister of the Republic of Bulgaria

    Source: Government of Italy (English)

    The President of the Council of Ministers, Giorgia Meloni, received the Prime Minister of the Republic of Bulgaria, Rossen Jeliazkov, at Palazzo Chigi today.

    The meeting provided an opportunity to acknowledge the common will to deepen bilateral relations in strategic sectors such as infrastructure and transport, energy, interconnections and defence.

    During the discussion, a broad alignment of views between Rome and Sofia also emerged on the main European issues, starting with cohesion policy, enlargement and the pursuit of innovative solutions to irregular migration.

    With regard to the major issues in international politics, the two leaders focused on the conflict in Ukraine, confirming their support for the ongoing efforts to reach a just and lasting peace.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI: Final Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Octopus Apollo VCT plc
    Final Results

    Octopus Apollo VCT plc today announces the final results for the year ended 31 January 2025.

    Octopus Apollo VCT plc (‘Apollo’ or the ‘Company’) is a Venture Capital Trust (VCT) which aims to provide shareholders with attractive tax-free dividends and long-term capital growth by investing in a diverse portfolio of predominantly unquoted companies.

    The Company is managed by Octopus Investments Limited (‘Octopus’ or the ‘Portfolio Manager’) via its investment team, Octopus Ventures.

    HIGHLIGHTS

      Year to
    31 January 2025
    Year to
    31 January 2024
    Net assets (£’000) £482,563 £390,294
    Profit/(loss) after tax (£’000) £24,110 £(435)
    Net asset value (NAV) per share1 50.5p 50.5p
    Cumulative dividends paid since launch 90.0p 87.4p
    Total value per share2 140.5p 137.9p
    Dividends paid in the year 2.6p 2.7p
    Dividend yield3 5.1% 5.1%
    Dividend declared 1.3p 1.3p
    Total return per share %4 5.1% 0.0%
    1. NAV per share is calculated as net assets divided by total number of shares, as described in the glossary of terms.
    2. Total value per share is calculated by adding together NAV per share and cumulative dividends paid since launch.
    3. Dividend yield is calculated as dividends paid in the period, divided by the NAV per share at the beginning of the period.
    4. Total return per share % is an alternative performance measure (APM) calculated as movement in NAV per share in the period plus dividends paid in the period, divided by the NAV per share at the beginning of the period, as described in the glossary of terms.

    CHAIR’S STATEMENT

    Highlights

    • Apollo’s latest fundraise: £75 million
    • Total return over five years: 45.3%
    • Dividends paid in 2025: 2.6p

    Apollo’s total return for the year to 31 January 2025 was 5.1% with the net assets at the end of the period totalling £483 million.

    Performance

    I am pleased to present the annual results for Apollo for the year ended 31 January 2025. The NAV plus cumulative dividends per share at 31 January 2025 was 140.5p, an increase of 2.6p per share from 31 January 2024. During the year the NAV per share remained stable at 50.5p which represents, after adding back the 2.6p of dividends paid in the year, a total return for the year of 5.1% compared to 0% in the previous year. This outcome highlights the Company’s overall resilience and positive performance, despite the uncertain macro environment. I also note several exciting new investments have been made in the period, showing that the Company is successfully growing the overall size of the portfolio.

    In the twelve months to 31 January 2025, we utilised £86.1 million of our cash resources, comprising £47.1 million in new and follow-on investments, £17.8 million in dividends (net of the Dividend Reinvestment Scheme (DRIS)), £8.6 million in management fees, £9.0 million in share buybacks, and £3.6 million in other running costs such as accounting and administration services and trail commissions. The cash and liquid resources balance of £95.7 million at 31 January 2025 represented 19.8% of net assets at that date, compared to £61.3 million, which represented 15.7% at 31 January 2024. Cash and liquid resources comprises cash at bank, money market funds (MMFs) and open ended investment companies (OEICs.)

    Performance incentive fees
    Apollo’s performance since 31 January 2024 has given rise to a performance fee being payable to Octopus of £6.1 million. The performance fee is calculated as 20% on all gains above the High-Water Mark, the highest total return as at previous year ends, of 137.9p as at 31 January 2024.

    Dividends
    It is your Board’s policy to maintain a regular dividend flow where possible to take advantage of the tax-free distributions a VCT can provide, and work towards the targeted 5% annual dividend yield policy.

    I am pleased to confirm that the Board declared a second interim dividend of 1.3p per share in respect of the year ended 31 January 2025. This second interim dividend, in addition to the 1.3p per share interim dividend paid in December 2024 brings the total dividends declared to 2.6p per share in respect of the year ended 31 January 2025. The dividend was paid on 8 May 2025 to shareholders on the register at 22 April 2025. Since inception, we have paid a total of 91.3p in tax-free dividends per share, comprising 90.0p in previous distributions and an additional 1.3p paid in May. Considering dividends paid during 2024 (totalling 2.6p), the total dividend yield for the year is 5.1%, therefore meeting the Company’s target.

    Apollo’s DRIS was introduced in November 2014 and currently 20.7% of shareholders take advantage of it as it is an attractive scheme for investors who would prefer to benefit from additional income tax relief on their reinvested dividend. I hope that shareholders will find this scheme beneficial. During the year to 31 January 2025, 10,800,892 shares were issued under the DRIS, equating to a reinvested amount of £5.3 million.

    Fundraise and share buybacks
    On 19 March 2024, the Company closed its offer to raise £50 million, which led the Board to increase the offer by a further £35 million. I am pleased to report that we successfully raised the full £85 million, closing the offer on 24 September 2024.

    Following on from this, on 23 October 2024, the Company launched an offer to raise a further £50 million with an over-allotment facility for a further £25 million. I am delighted to report that we raised the full £75 million, so the offer closed fully subscribed on 21 March 2025. We would like to take this opportunity to welcome all new shareholders and thank all existing shareholders for their continued support.

    Apollo has continued to buy back and cancel shares as required. Subject to shareholder approval of resolution 10 at the forthcoming Annual General Meeting (AGM), this facility will remain in place to provide liquidity to investors who may wish to sell their shares, subject to the Board’s discretion. Details of the share buybacks undertaken during the year can be found in the Directors’ Report.

    Dividends, whether paid in cash or reinvested under the DRIS, and share buybacks are always at the discretion of the Board, are never guaranteed and may be reviewed when necessary.

    VCT sunset clause
    In November 2023, a ten-year extension was announced to the ‘sunset clause’ (a retirement date for the VCT scheme), meaning VCT tax reliefs will be available until 5 April 2035. This extension passed through Parliament in February 2024 and on 3 September 2024 His Majesty’s Treasury brought the extension into effect through The Finance Act 2024.

    Board of Directors
    Alex Hambro, having originally been appointed to the Board of Octopus Eclipse VCT 3 and 4 PLC in 2005, and then continuing as a Director following the merger with the Octopus Apollo VCTs in 2016, has decided to retire from the Board and will not be seeking re-election at the forthcoming AGM. It has been a pleasure to work with Alex, and I would like to take this opportunity to thank him on behalf of the Board and the shareholders for his substantial contribution over the years and help in guiding Apollo through its different phases of growth.

    A new Non-Executive Director will be appointed at the completion of a structured recruitment process, which is already underway. All the other Directors have indicated their willingness to remain on the Board, and both Chris Powles and Gillian Elcock will be seeking re-election at the AGM.

    Alternative Investment Fund (AIF)
    As announced on 30 September 2024, the Company is now classified as a full scope AIF under the European Union’s AIF Managers Directive (AIFMD). This is due to the Company’s success and continued growth in assets under management (AUM). This regulation is in place to ensure greater transparency and risk mitigation to protect investors. It is an exciting milestone for the Company, and the Board is working closely with Octopus to ensure all reporting requirements and management protocols are adopted.

    Portfolio Manager
    As reported in the half-yearly unaudited report, Richard Court (previously Apollo’s Lead Fund Manager), took on a new role in the period as Head of VCTs and Enterprise Investment Schemes (EIS) at Octopus Ventures. Paul Davidson, a Partner in the Octopus Ventures team, has replaced Richard as Lead Fund Manager as of September 2024. Paul brings with him eight years of experience, focusing on Apollo, and has worked closely with the Board (alongside Richard) for the last three years. The Board would like to take this opportunity to reiterate its congratulations to Paul on his new role and to again thank Richard for his contribution to the Company and wish him well in his new position. In January 2025, Erin Platts was appointed as new Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Octopus Ventures.

    AGM
    The AGM will be held on 10 July 2025 at 10am. Full details of the business to be conducted at the AGM are given in the Notice of the Meeting. We will have a Portfolio Manager’s update at the AGM, supported by a filmed update from the Portfolio Manager which will be available on the website at https://octopusinvestments.com/apollovct/.

    Shareholders’ views are important, and the Board encourages shareholders to vote on the resolutions by using the proxy form, or electronically at www.investorcentre.co.uk/eproxy.

    The Board has carefully considered the business to be approved at the AGM and recommends shareholders vote in favour of all the resolutions being proposed.

    Outlook
    I am pleased with the positive performance over the last six months, especially whilst the geo-political and economic landscape has been extremely challenging for portfolio companies to navigate. The uncertain conditions which have prevailed for the last couple of years have meant we have seen portfolio companies’ growth rates slow as trading conditions have become tougher and sales cycles have become more protracted. Companies have also looked to reduce their cash burn and focus on achieving profitability due to the scarcity and higher cost of capital. Some protection against these external factors has been offered by the contracted recurring revenue models that businesses within the portfolio have.

    Over the past 12 months, we have observed a recovery in the Company’s investment rate, with twice as many new investments being completed when comparing 2025/24 to 2024/23.. Market data supports this trend, showing more deals completed in the Series B and onwards space in 2024 compared to the prior year¹. The investment team is experiencing an increase in deal flow, especially in the last six months of 2024, and the current pipeline of opportunities looks very promising. In addition to the higher deal cadence, we are pleased that the Company concluded three profitable realisations, compared to one in the prior year.

    VCTs have long provided a compelling opportunity for UK investors to invest in businesses in a tax-efficient way, and we look forward to Apollo continuing to do so in the coming year. I would like to conclude by thanking both the Board and the Octopus team on behalf of all shareholders for their hard work.

    Murray Steele
    Chair

    ¹ https://carta.com/uk/en/data/vc-concentration-2024/

    PORTFOLIO MANAGER’S REVIEW

    At Octopus our focus is on managing your investments and providing open communication. Our annual and half-year updates are designed to keep you informed about the progress of your investment.

    Investment strategy
    In general, we invest in technology companies in the SaaS space that have recurring revenues from a diverse base of customers. We also seek to invest in companies that will provide an opportunity for Apollo to realise its investment typically within three to seven years.

    Apollo total value growth
    The total value has seen a significant increase over the five years from 119.8p to 140.5p at 31 January 2025. This increase in total value of 20.7p represents a 45.3% increase on the NAV of 45.7p as at 31 January 2020. Over the last five years, a total of more than £92.4 million has also been distributed back to shareholders in the form of tax-free dividends. This includes dividends reinvested as part of the DRIS.

    Focus on performance
    In the year to 31 January 2025, the NAV total return (NAV plus cumulative dividends) increased to 140.5p per share, giving a total return of 5.1% for the period. We are pleased with this modest uplift in total value, considering the challenging macroeconomic backdrop that our portfolio companies continued to navigate their way through over the last 12 months.

    The performance over the five years to 31 January 2025 is shown below:

    Year Ended NAV Dividends paid in year Cumulative
    dividends
    NAV + cumulative dividends Total return %
    31 January 2021 49.2p 2.3p 76.4p 125.6p 12.7%
    31 January 2022 50.2p 5.7p 82.1p 132.3p 13.6%
    31 January 2023 53.2p 2.6p 84.7p 137.9p 11.2%
    31 January 2024 50.5p 2.7p 87.4p 137.9p 0.0%
    31 January 2025 50.5p 2.6p 90.0p 140.5p 5.1%

    Over the year, including disposals, there have been valuation increases across 29 portfolio companies, delivering a collective increase of £62 million. These increases reflect businesses which have successfully managed to grow revenues through the period. The strongest performers have generally exhibited improving profitability levels and revenue growth from their customer base and some of the top performers include Definely, Lodgify and TRI.

    Conversely, 20 companies saw a decrease in valuation, collectively totalling £23 million. The businesses that saw the most significant reductions were Edge10, Synchtank and Peak Data. Growth has decelerated or in some cases revenues have declined in several portfolio companies and they have experienced decreases in their valuation. This has mainly been due to continued challenges in selling their software products into corporates who have experienced declining software expense budgets. There have also been some company-specific performance issues impacting a small number of companies in the portfolio.

    In aggregate, this resulted in a net increase in portfolio company valuations of £39 million.

    As part of ongoing liquidity management, Apollo regularly invests in and withdraws from MMFs in order to meet cash requirements. During the year, an additional £35.6 million (including interest) was invested in MMFs. Apollo also holds an investment in the Sequoia Economic Infrastructure Fund (SEQI), but no further investment was made in this fund during the year. These investments, in combination with the previously held investments in SEQI and the MMFs, took the total liquid investments as at 31 January 2025 to £91.5 million (including interest earned during the year on MMF deposits).

    Disposals
    Three profitable disposals were completed in the year. All of these investments were made prior to the change of investment focus to B2B SaaS businesses. The first exit was Dyscova Ltd (trading as Care & Independence (C&I)) which was acquired by GBUK Group, a company which designs, develops and distributes a portfolio of own and third-party branded acute-setting medical devices. Apollo first invested in C&I in 2016 and the exit resulted in Apollo achieving a 1.7x total return on its investment.

    In September 2024, we were pleased to exit our holding in Countrywide Healthcare Supplies Holdings which was acquired by Personnel Hygiene Services Ltd, a hygiene services provider. The Company first invested in 2014, and the exit resulted in a 4.4x return on our initial investment, which is an excellent outcome.

    In November 2024, nCino, a cloud-based software company that provides a platform for financial institutions to manage their business, acquired FullCircl. This acquisition will enhance nCino’s data and automation capabilities and allow it to expand its reach across the UK and Europe. Apollo made its initial investment in 2011, and the disposal resulted in a positive return for the Company.

    One disposal during the year resulted in a partial loss on investment when Ryte GmbH, a marketing software technology platform, was acquired by Semrush Holdings Inc. Two companies were placed into administration in the year, Rotolight and Origami Energy. However, given the underlying holding valuations of these companies at the time of them going into administration, this did not have a material impact on the Company’s performance during the year. In aggregate, the investment cost of the companies placed into administration totalled £5.3 million. The underperformance of a portfolio company is always disappointing for Apollo and shareholders alike, but it is an inevitable feature of a venture capital portfolio, and we believe that successful exits will continue to outweigh any losses that could arise over the medium to long term of managing the portfolio. In the year, all disposals, including loan repayments, collectively returned £21.7 million in cash to Apollo, with the aggregate investment cost totalling £15.4 million.

      Year ended 31 January 2021 Year ended 31 January 2022 Year ended 31 January 2023 Year ended 31 January 2024 Year ended 31 January 2025 Total
    Dividends paid in the year (£’000) 7,471 28,3661 14,323 19,165 23,097 92,423
    Disposal proceeds (£’000) 3,356 53,939 3,591 18,292 21,713 100,981

    1 Dividends paid to shareholders in the year ended 31 January 2022, including a special dividend of 3.1p per share.

    As illustrated in the table above, we are pleased to have paid dividends from disposal proceeds over the past five years. The nature and timing of realising investments in a venture capital portfolio means it can affect our ability to do so. The Company also tries to maximise the outcome of the underlying holdings in an exit scenario which may not always align with a specific financial period.

    New and follow-on investments
    During the year, in-line with the broader private capital market, the Company demonstrated increasing new investment activity with Apollo investing £34.1 million into eight new opportunities (this includes second tranches of prior year new investments) as compared to four new investments completing in the prior year, totalling £15.2 million. For follow-on investments, we also saw an increased number with £13 million being invested into nine companies compared to seven follow-on investments completing in the year to 31 January 2024 adding up to £17.8 million invested.

    Apollo’s new investments were in several exciting B2B software companies operating in a variety of end-markets:

    • Definely £2.8 million – An AI based legal tech software company supporting legal professionals in drafting and reviewing contractual documentation.
    • Switchee £2.5 million – A smart thermostat hardware and software provider focused on social housing and housing associations.
    • Cambri £4.2 million – An insights software platform that increases the quality, speed and cost effectiveness of producing research for new product launches.
    • Vyntelligence £4.5 million – A video intelligence and AI-driven data capture platform addressing inefficiencies in communication, reporting, and operational workflows within large infrastructure sectors.
    • Semble £2.5 million – An all-in-one platform for healthcare practices, enhancing patient care and streamlining operations.
    • bsport £8.4 million – An all-in-one software platform designed to manage boutique fitness and wellness studios.
    • Threatmark £6.1 million – A fraud prevention platform that uses real-time behavioural data to accurately identify payment fraud.

    Q&A
    How do we think about exiting our positions?
    In traditional venture capital, a relatively small number of investments generate a significant proportion of the fund’s performance. However, for Apollo we try to construct a portfolio where the majority of the portfolio delivers the majority of the Company’s performance. The investment team takes an active role to try and optimise each specific situation. This means we have certain situations where companies may be held for longer if we think it is in the best interest of investors and the Company. Conversely, there are other situations where we may seek to exit earlier if market conditions permit. This means we maintain good portfolio management discipline to make sure realised proceeds materially contribute towards financing the Company’s ongoing running costs and meeting its dividends targets.

    Private markets are illiquid, and as a result, the opportunities to sell all or some of our holding in a particular company can be unpredictable and governed by prevailing market conditions. We work closely with each portfolio company to understand and optimise its growth plans, with the goal of it maintaining flexibility over exit timing with the best interests of its shareholders in mind.

    Wider macroeconomic conditions often influence exits as much as company specific factors. We also recognise that timing may not always be right to exit a position, and patience can allow for greater value growth. In such cases, we will continue to support portfolio companies, stay alert to opportunities, and help create them proactively through our network.

    When do we start to think about exits?
    We look to understand who the likely acquirers are from the outset and throughout the holding period. This can help inform important strategic decisions which contribute to value creation for shareholders. It is healthy for our portfolio companies to maintain relationships with key potential acquirers. These can often be commercial partners before becoming acquirers, and as such this activity can be highly productive.

    We know not all companies will be as successful as we hoped at the time of the initial investment. We therefore seek to realise investments in companies which are underperforming and unlikely to generate a meaningful return. It can also help to find a “soft landing” for the company’s employees where the alternative may be placing the business into administration. However, to date this has only been in a very small minority of cases. Although generally not meaningful to investor returns, our behaviour in these scenarios is important.

    How do we work with portfolio company boards?
    We believe that it is important to be an active and supportive investor, so we typically appoint a Non-Executive Director or observer to the board of our portfolio companies. This allows us to offer ongoing support at the top level of the business and be involved in key decisions. It also gives us the opportunity to share any expertise and insights that we may have. Even very experienced founders may only sell a business once or twice in their career, whereas as investors, we may be involved in a few such transactions each year. We therefore look to support our portfolio companies by sharing the learnings and experience gathered across our team, all with the objective of obtaining the best outcome for our investors and shareholders in the Company overall.

    Valuations
    The table below illustrates the distribution of valuation methodologies used across Apollo’s B2B software investments (shown as a percentage of portfolio value and number of companies). B2B software accounts for 99% of Apollo’s total fixed asset investments. Methodologies include:
    • ‘External price’ includes valuations based on funding rounds that typically completed by the year end or shortly after the year end, and exits of companies where terms have been agreed or proposed with an acquirer;
    • ‘Multiples’ is predominantly used for valuations that are based on a multiple of revenue or EBITDA for portfolio companies; • ‘Scenario analysis’ is utilised where there is uncertainty around the potential outcomes available to a company, so a probability-weighted scenario analysis is considered.

    Having arrived at a valuation of the portfolio company, to distribute the equity value within a portfolio company’s capital structure, taking into account the priority of financial instruments and the economic rights of debt and shares Apollo holds, the Current Value Method (CVM) is typically employed. This method allocates the equity value to different equity interests as if the business were sold on the reporting date, thereby reflecting the effects of the distribution waterfall.

    Valuation methodology By value By number of companies
    Multiples 77% 64%
    Scenario analysis 18% 22%
    External price 5% 8%
    Write-off 6%

    Case studies
    definely
    definely.com
    LegalTech solution helping lawyers at every pre-execution stage of the contract lifecycle

    • 40,000 active users
    • top 25 of the prestigious Deloitte UK Technology Fast50
    • 75 employees located globally

    Definely, founded in 2020, is a UK LegalTech company created to make legal documents easier to read, edit and understand. Definely was founded by two former Magic Circle lawyers, one of whom is registered blind. They set out to make legal documents more accessible to those with visual impairments and soon realised that their solution solved a problem faced by all lawyers, daily. Headquartered in London, it has over 75 employees located globally.

    Fuelled by investment from Apollo, the company is now focused on adding to its existing base of 40,000 active users from the largest companies and law firms in the UK, US, Canada and Australia. In 2023, the company was named in the top 25 of the prestigious Deloitte UK Technology Fast50. Customers include AO Shearman, Slaughter and May, Dentons and Deloitte.

    Cambri
    cambri.io
    Helping brands innovate iteratively to bring successful products to market fast

    • 80% prediction accuracy for product launch success
    • 68% year-over-year ARR growth

    Cambri is an AI consumer insights and innovation platform which addresses a major industry problem – that of the high failure rate of product launches. Traditional market research, consumer insights, and prediction models are outdated, static, and notoriously inaccurate, typically delivering just 40% prediction accuracy. This means brands waste time and resources developing and launching products that consumers don’t need. By contrast, Cambri’s proprietary AI engine predicts the likelihood of a product’s success and provides actionable insights to help improve products before launch.

    Cambri’s AI models are two to three times more accurate than traditional methods, enabling its customers to regularly achieve over 80% prediction accuracy for product launch success – contributing to Cambri’s 68% year-over-year annual recurring revenue (ARR) growth. Household food and beverage brands such as Coca-Cola and Nestle already utilise the platform.

    Top 10 investments by value as at 31 January 2025
    Here, we set out the cost and valuation of the top ten holdings, which account for over 57% of the value of the portfolio.

      Portfolio: Investment cost (£’000) Fair value of investment (£’000)
    1 Natterbox £18,990 £44,419
    2 Lodgify £12,611 £33,912
    3 Ubisecure £9,075 £25,811
    4 Tri £3,800 £22,070
    5 Interact £308 £20,658
    6 Sova £12,250 £19,266
    7 FableData £8,600 £15,780
    8 ValueBlue £10,071 £15,031
    9 MentionMe £15,000 £15,000
    10 FuseUniversal £8,000 £14,394

    Top 10
    1
    N2JB Limited (trading as Natterbox)

    Natterbox is a London-based provider of business-to-business cloud telephone services that are uniquely integrated into Customer Resource Management (CRM) software platforms, most notably Salesforce.

    www.natterbox.com

    Investment date: March 2018
    Equity held: 9.0%
    (2024: 8.5%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £177,000
    (2024: £150,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: £19,289,000
    (2022: £17,092,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: £(644,000)
    (2022: £(2,568,000))
    Consolidated net assets: £646,000
    (2022: £1,022,000)

    2
    Codebay Solutions Limited (trading as Lodgify)
    Lodgify provides a SaaS platform for vacation rental hosts and property managers to manage their business and process their bookings.

    www.lodgify.com

    Investment date: September 2022
    Equity held: 15.3%
    (2024: 11.9%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: n/a
    (2024: n/a)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: €14,508,000
    (2022: €9,315,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: €(7,462,000)
    (2022: €(6,239,000))
    Consolidated net assets: €10,390,000
    (2022: €16,946,000)

    3

    Ubisecure Holdings Limited
    Ubisecure is a provider of customer identity access management software.

    www.ubisecure.com

    Investment date: May 2018
    Equity held: 73.4%
    (2024: 33.3%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £179,000
    (2024: £197,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: £8,674,000
    (2022: £6,923,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: £(3,091,000)
    (2022: £(2,135,000)
    Consolidated net liabilities: £(3,053,000)
    (2022: £(287,000))

    4
    Triumph Holdings Limited (TRI)
    TRI has developed a risk based quality management and monitoring platform for the life sciences industry

    www.tritrials.com

    Investment date: October 2018
    Equity held: 52.0%
    (2024: 52.0%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £174,000
    (2023: £171,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: Not available1
    (2022: Not available1)
    Consolidated profit before tax: Not available1
    (2022: Not available1)
    Consolidated net assets: £2,758,000
    (2021: £2,875,000)

    5
    Hasgrove Limited
    Hasgrove is the holding company for Interact, a SaaS business which provides an intranet product which focuses on the communication and collaboration requirements of large organisations.

    www.interactsoftware.com

    Investment date: December 2016
    Equity held: 5.9%
    (2024: 5.7%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: n/a
    (2024: n/a)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: £37,032,000
    (2022: £29,388,000)
    Consolidated profit before tax: £9,907,000
    (2022: £8,099,000)
    Consolidated net assets: £13,344,000
    (2022: £13,136,000)

    6
    Sova Assessment Limited
    Sova Assessment is a UK based end-to-end digital candidate assessment SaaS platform targeting large blue-chip organisations conducting large volumes of hiring.

    www.sovaassessment.com

    Investment date: November 2020
    Equity held: 37.2%
    (2024: 37.2%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £104,000
    (2024: £93,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 March 2024
    Consolidated turnover: £6,780,000
    (2023: £5,611,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: £(3,685,000)
    (2023: £(5,360,000))
    Consolidated net liabilities: £(5,460,000)
    (2023: £(3,593,000))

    7
    Fable Data Limited
    Fable Data provides anonymised, pan-European consumer transaction data and analysis to institutional investors, businesses, governments and academics.

    www.fabledata.com
      

    Investment date: December 2022
    Equity held: 14.2%
    (2024: 6.2%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: n/a
    (2024: n/a)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: Not available1
    (2022: Not available1)
    Consolidated profit before tax: Not available1
    (2022: Not available1)
    Consolidated net liabilities: £(1,720,000)
    (2022: £(2,111,000))
       

    8
    Value Blue B.V.
    Value Blue is a provider of enterprise architecture management software, that is growing in the UK. The product allows companies to map their existing technology architecture in a single location to easily plan, collaborate and execute both large scale transformational and everyday IT projects.

    www.valueblue.com

    Investment date: January 2022
    Equity held: 20.3%
    (2024: 20.3%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £317,000
    (2024: £19,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: Not available1
    (2022: Not available1)
    Consolidated loss before tax: €(7,412,000)
    (2022: €(9,185,000))
    Consolidated net liabilities: €(6,189,000)
    (2022: €(4,595,000))

    9
    Mention Me Limited
    Mention Me is a referral engineering SaaS platform that helps business to consumer (B2C) businesses acquire new customers more successfully through their referral channel.

    www.mention-me.com

    Investment date: December 2021
    Equity held: 19.4%
    (2024: 19.4%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: n/a
    (2024: n/a)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: £11,561,000
    (2022: £10,244,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: £(5,175,000)
    (2022: £(5,621,000))
    Consolidated net assets: £5,302,000
    (2022: £10,173,000)

    10
    Fuse Universal Limited

    Fuse is a business-to-business software provider of a cloud-based learning technology platform for corporates, founded in 2008 and based in London (with further offices in South Africa and Australia).

    www.fuseuniversal.com

    Investment date: August 2019
    Equity held: 0%
    (2024: 0%)
    Valuation basis: Revenue multiple
    Income received in year to 31 January 2025: £56,000
    (2024: £100,000)
    Last submitted accounts: 31 December 2023
    Consolidated turnover: £7,997,000
    (2022: £9,338,000)
    Consolidated loss before tax: £(1,044,000)
    (2022: £(2,816,000))
    Consolidated net liabilities: £(2,468,000)
    (2022: £(3,682,000))
    1. These numbers are not available per the latest public filings on Companies House or the company is non-UK.

    Outlook

    It has been a challenging few years for the broader technology sector, with both geopolitical and economic factors impacting the ability of portfolio companies to grow and perform as successfully as forecast. Against this backdrop, I am pleased to report a stable NAV as portfolio companies have shown great resilience in the face of these challenges. Companies have been operating more efficiently in terms of their capital requirements and in several cases we are seeing top-line revenue growth returning steadily, albeit not to the same degree as experienced prior to the beginning of this more turbulent period. The slowdown in revenue growth observed across the portfolio occurred alongside companies striving to preserve cash and move towards profitability to extend their cash runways.

    The nature of the current portfolio and the characteristics of the technology-focused businesses means that several companies have had some degree of protection from the full impact of these more challenging macroeconomic conditions. This is due to recurring revenues and long-term contracts being key features of their business models.

    As mentioned in the Chair’s Statement, we were delighted and grateful for the support we’ve received from the Company’s new and existing investors, with the latest fundraise closing fully subscribed, including the overallotment facility. These funds will allow the Company to continue to support the existing portfolio in their growth plans and to invest in new opportunities which have the potential to become successful and deliver great returns to shareholders in the years to come.

    We were also pleased that the Company benefitted from three profitable disposals in the period, which together returned £18.9 million in proceeds to the Company. We are hopeful that this could indicate an improvement in the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) market, providing more opportunities for exits and offering the Company sustainable growth prospects.

    Despite the macroeconomic climate remaining uncertain, we believe that the rapid pace of change and advancements being made with the development and adoption of AI technology will create many new businesses seeking growth capital. This provides us with a degree of optimism about the Company’s future investment prospects and for its current well-diversified portfolio, as the component companies seek to take advantage which component companies are similarly seeking to take advantage of these advancements in AI. Hence, I am confident that the Company is well-positioned to capitalise on these market opportunities as they arise and that they will be able to offer further growth potential for the Company’s continued success.

    RISKS AND RISK MANAGEMENT

    The Board assesses the risks faced by Apollo and, as a board, reviews the mitigating controls and actions, and monitors the effectiveness of these controls and actions.

    Emerging and principal risks, and risk management

    The Board is mindful of the ongoing risks and will continue to make sure that appropriate safeguards are in place, in addition to monitoring the cash flow forecasts to make sure that the Company has sufficient liquidity.

    The Board carries out a regular review of the risk environment in which the Company operates.

    Emerging risks

    The Board has considered emerging risks. The Board seeks to mitigate emerging risks and those noted below by setting policy, regular review of performance and monitoring progress and compliance. In the mitigation and management of these risks, the Board applies the principles detailed in the Financial Reporting Council’s Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting.

    The following are some of the potential emerging risks management and the Board are currently monitoring:

    • adverse changes in global macroeconomic environment;
    • artificial intelligence;
    • geopolitical tensions; and
    • climate change.

    Principal risks

    Risk Mitigation Change
    Investment performance:    
    The focus of Apollo’s investments is in unquoted, small and medium-sized VCT qualifying companies which, by their nature, entail a higher level of risk and may have lower cash reserves than investments in larger quoted companies. Poor performance across these investments may impact Apollo’s ability to raise new funds from investors. Octopus has significant experience and a strong track record of investing in unquoted companies, and appropriate due diligence is undertaken on every new investment. A member of the Octopus Ventures team is typically appointed to the board of a portfolio company subject to an evaluation using a risk based approach that considers the size of the company within the Apollo portfolio and the engagement levels of other investors. Regular board reports are prepared by the portfolio company’s management and examined by the Portfolio Manager. This arrangement, in conjunction with its Portfolio Talent team’s active involvement, allows Apollo to play a prominent role in a portfolio company’s ongoing development and strategy. Although investment strategy is focused on B2B software, the overall risk in the portfolio is mitigated by diversifying investment across a wide spread of holdings in terms of the underlying sub-sector served by the portfolio companies, and their financing stage, age, industry sector and business models. The Board reviews the investment portfolio with the Portfolio Manager on a regular basis. The Portfolio Manager is incentivised to make sure Apollo performs well, via a Performance Incentive Fee (charged annually) for exceeding certain performance hurdles. Increased exposures reflected in the previous period remain unchanged due to the continuing difficult macro environment and challenging trading conditions for some portfolio companies continuing.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    VCT qualifying status risk:    
    Apollo is required at all times to observe the conditions for the maintenance of HMRC-approved VCT status. The loss of such approval could lead to Apollo and its investors losing access to the tax benefits associated with VCT status and, in certain circumstances, to investors being required to repay the initial income tax relief on their investment. Prior to making an investment, the Portfolio Manager seeks assurance from Apollo’s VCT status adviser that the investment will meet the legislative requirements for VCT investments.

    On an ongoing basis, the Portfolio Manager monitors Apollo’s compliance with VCT regulations on a current and forecast basis to ensure ongoing compliance with VCT legislation. Regular updates are provided to the Board throughout the year.

    The VCT status adviser formally reviews Apollo’s compliance with VCT regulations on a bi-annual basis and reports its results to the Board.

    VCT status monitoring by independent advisers continues to reduce the risk of an issue causing a loss of VCT status.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Operational – reliance on third parties:    
    The Board is reliant on the Portfolio Manager to manage investments effectively, and manage the services of a number of third parties, in particular the registrar and tax advisers. A failure of the systems or controls at the Portfolio Manager or third-party providers could lead to an inability to provide accurate reporting and to ensure adherence to VCT and other regulatory rules. The Board reviews the system of internal control, both financial and non-financial, operated by the Portfolio Manager (to the extent the latter are relevant to Apollo’s internal controls). These include controls that are designed to ensure that Apollo’s assets are safeguarded and that proper accounting records are maintained, as well as any regulatory reporting. Feedback on other third-parties is reported to the Board on at least an annual basis, including adherence to Service Level Agreements where relevant. During the year a depositary has been appointed. This increases the number of key third parties involved in the running of the Company, but also adds additional layers of oversight of the Portfolio Manager. No overall change in risk exposure on balance.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Information security:    
    A lack of suitable controls could result in a data breach and fines and/or business disruption. The Board is reliant on the Portfolio Manager and third parties to take appropriate measures to prevent a loss of confidential customer information or other malicious events. Annual due diligence is conducted on third parties, which includes a review of their controls for information security. The Portfolio Manager has a dedicated information security team and a third party is engaged to provide continual protection in this area. A security framework is in place to help prevent malicious events. The Portfolio Manager reports to the Board on an annual basis to update it on relevant information security arrangements. Significant and relevant information security breaches are escalated to the Board when they occur. No overall change on balance, although cyber threat remains a significant risk area faced by all service providers. The appropriateness of mitigants in place are continuously reassessed to adapt to new risk exposures, such as those posed by artificial intelligence.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Economic:    
    Events such as an economic recession, movement in interest rates, fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, inflation, political instability and rising living costs could adversely affect some smaller companies’ valuations, as they may be more vulnerable to changes in trading conditions or the sectors in which they operate. This could result in a reduction in the value of Apollo’s assets. Apollo invests in a portfolio of companies serving markets across a diverse range of sectors, which helps to mitigate against the impact of performance in any one sector. Apollo also maintains adequate liquidity to make sure that it can continue to provide follow-on investment to those portfolio companies that require it and which is supported by the individual investment case.

    The Portfolio Manager monitors the impact of macroeconomic conditions on an ongoing basis and provides updates to the Board at least quarterly.

    Increased exposures reflected in the previous periods remain and have heightened further as economic uncertainty persists through interest rate changes, the risk of recession and other economic factors.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Legislative:    
    A change to the VCT regulations could adversely impact Apollo by restricting the companies Apollo can invest in under its current strategy. Similarly, changes to VCT tax reliefs for investors could make VCTs less attractive and impact Apollo’s ability to raise further funds.

    Failure to adhere to other relevant legislation and regulation could result in reputational damage and/or fines.

    We are also pleased that the sunset clause in place for April 2025, regarding eligibility of VCTs for tax relief, has been extended to 2035.

    The Portfolio Manager engages with HM Treasury and industry bodies to demonstrate the positive benefits of VCTs in terms of growing UK companies, creating jobs and increasing tax revenue, and to help shape any change to VCT legislation.

    The Portfolio Manager employs individuals with expertise across the legislation and regulation relevant to Apollo. Individuals receive ongoing training and external experts are engaged where required.

    Risk exposure has continued to reduce since the previous period following the extension of the sunset clause to 2035 being agreed.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Liquidity:    
    Apollo invests in smaller unquoted companies, which are inherently illiquid as there is no readily available market for these shares. Therefore, these may be difficult to realise for their fair market value at short notice. The Portfolio Manager prepares cash flow forecasts to make sure cash levels are maintained in accordance with policies agreed with the Board. Apollo’s overall liquidity levels are monitored on a quarterly basis by the Board, with close monitoring of available cash resources. Apollo maintains sufficient cash and readily realisable securities, including MMFs and OEICs, which can be accessed at short notice. At 31 January 2025, 91% of current asset investments were held in MMFs, realisable within one business day, and 9% in OEICs, realisable within seven business days. Risk exposure remains unchanged from the previous period.
    Risk Mitigation Change
    Valuation:    
    While investments within the portfolio are valued in accordance with International Private Equity and Venture Capital (IPEV) valuation guidelines, for smaller companies establishing a fair value can be difficult due to the lack of readily available market data for similar shares, resulting in a limited number of external reference points. Valuations of portfolio companies are performed by appropriately experienced staff, with detailed knowledge of both the portfolio company and the market in which it operates. These valuations are then subject to review and approval by the Octopus Valuations Committee, comprised of staff who are independent of Octopus Ventures and with relevant knowledge of unquoted company valuations. The Board reviews valuations after they have been agreed by the Octopus Valuations Committee. Risk exposure remains unchanged from the previous period due to economic uncertainty within valuation modelling.

    VIABILITY STATEMENT
    In accordance with provision 36 of the AIC Code of Corporate Governance, the Directors have assessed the prospects of the Company over a period of five years, consistent with the expected investment holding period of a VCT investor. Under VCT rules, subscribing investors are required to hold their investment for a five-year period in order to benefit from the associated tax reliefs. The Board regularly considers strategy, including investor demand for the Company’s shares, and a five-year period is considered to be a reasonable time horizon for this.

    The Board carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks facing the Company and its current position.

    This includes risks which may adversely impact its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity, and focused on the major factors which affect the economic, regulatory and political environment. Particular consideration was given to the Company’s reliance on, and close working relationship with, the Portfolio Manager. The principal risks faced by the Company and the procedures in place to monitor and mitigate them are set out above.

    The Board has carried out robust stress testing of cash flows which included assessing the resilience of portfolio companies, including the requirement for any future financial support and the ability to pay dividends and buybacks.

    The Board has additionally considered the ability of the Company to comply with the ongoing conditions to make sure it maintains its VCT qualifying status under its current investment policy.

    Based on the above assessment the Board confirms that it has a reasonable expectation that the Company will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the five-year period to 31 January 2030. The Board is mindful of the ongoing risks and will continue to make sure that appropriate safeguards are in place, in addition to monitoring the cash flow forecasts to make sure that the Company has sufficient liquidity.

    DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES STATEMENT

    The Directors are responsible for preparing the Strategic Report, the Directors’ Report, the Directors’ Remuneration Report and the Financial Statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. They are also responsible for ensuring that the Annual Report and Accounts include information required by the Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority.

    Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable laws) including FRS 102 – “The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the UK and Republic of Ireland”. Under company law the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs and profit or loss of the Company for that period.

    In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to:

    • select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
    • make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
    • state whether applicable UK accounting standards have been followed, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;
    • prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company will continue in business; and
    • prepare a Strategic Report, a Directors’ Report and Directors’ Remuneration Report which comply with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

    The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the Company and enable them to make sure that the financial statements and the Directors’ Remuneration Report comply with the Companies Act 2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

    Insofar as each of the Directors is aware:

    • there is no relevant audit information of which the Company’s auditor is unaware; and
    • the Directors have taken all steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditor is aware of that information.

    The Directors are responsible for preparing the annual report in accordance with applicable law and regulations. Having taken advice from the Audit and Risk Committee, the Directors consider the annual report and the financial statements, taken as a whole, provide the information necessary to assess the Company’s position, performance, business model and strategy and is fair, balanced and understandable.

    The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial information included on the Company’s website. Legislation in the United Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.

    The Directors confirm that, to the best of their knowledge:

    • the financial statements, prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice, including FRS 102, give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and profit or loss of the Company; and
    • the Annual Report and Accounts (including the Strategic Report), give a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the position of the Company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that it faces.

    On behalf of the Board

    Murray Steele
    Chair

    INCOME STATEMENT

        Year ended 31 January 2025 Year ended 31 January 2024
        Revenue
    £’000
    Capital
    £’000
    Total
    £’000
    Revenue
    £’000
    Capital
    £’000
    Total
    £’000
    Realised gain/(loss) on disposal of fixed asset investments   1,226 1,226 (876) (876)
    Change in fair value of fixed asset investments   37,666 37,666 9,3171 9,3171
    Change in fair value of current asset investments   (574) (574) 16 16
    Investment income   4,082 4,082 2,5761 2,5761
    Investment management fees   (2,147) (6,442) (8,589) (1,862) (5,587) (7,449)
    Performance fee   (6,139) (6,139) (14) (14)
    Other expenses   (3,555) (3,555) (4,006) (4,006)
    Foreign currency translation   (7) (7) 1 1
    Profit/(loss) before tax   (1,627) 25,737 24,110 (3,291)1 2,8561 (435)
    Tax  
    Profit/(loss) after tax   (1,627) 25,737 24,110 (3,291)1 2,8561 (435)
    Earnings/(loss) per share – basic and diluted   (0.2p) 3.0p 2.8p (0.5p)1 0.4p1 (0.1p)
    • The ‘Total’ column of this statement is the profit and loss account of Apollo; the revenue return and capital return columns have been prepared under guidance published by the Association of Investment Companies.
    • All revenue and capital items in the above statement derive from continuing operations.
    • Apollo has only one class of business and derives its income from investments made in shares and securities and from money market funds.

    1 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    Apollo has no other comprehensive income for the period.

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

    BALANCE SHEET

        As at 31 January 2025 As at 31 January 2024
        £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
    Fixed asset investments     395,018   331,8781
    Current assets:          
    Investments   7,912   8,486  
    Money market funds   83,544   47,950  
    Debtors   1,424   2441  
    Cash at bank   4,251   4,868  
    Applications cash   16,780   8,852  
    Total current assets   113,911   70,4001  
    Current liabilities   (26,366)   (11,984)  
    Net current assets     87,545   58,4161
    Net assets     482,563   390,294

    Share capital

       

    956

     

    773

    Share premium     62,281   27,476
    Special distributable reserve     299,284   266,132
    Capital redemption reserve     191   172
    Capital reserve realised     (25,949)   (15,275)
    Capital reserve unrealised     153,438   117,0271
    Revenue reserve     (7,638)   (6,011)1
    Total shareholders’ funds     482,563   390,294
    Net asset value per share – basic and diluted     50.5p   50.5p

    1The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    The statements were approved by the Directors and authorised for issue on 22 May 2025 and are signed on their behalf by:

    Murray Steele
    Chair
    Company number: 05840377

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

    STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

      Share capital

    £’000

    Share premium

    £’000

    Special distributable reserves1

    £’000

    Capital redemption reserve

    £’000

    Capital reserve realised1

    £’000

    Capital reserve unrealised

    £’000

    Revenue reserve1

    £’000

    Total

    £’000

    As at 1 February 2024 773 27,476 266,132 172 (15,275) 117,0272 (6,011) 2 390,294
    Total comprehensive income for the year (11,355) 37,092 (1,627) 24,110
    Total contributions by and distributions to owners:
    Repurchase and cancellation of own shares (19) (8,981) 19 (8,981)
    Issue of shares 202 106,017 106,219
    Share issue cost (5,982) (5,982)
    Dividends paid (23,097) (23,097)
    Total contributions by and distributions to owners: 183 100,035 (32,078) 19 68,159
    Other movements:                
    Prior year fixed asset gains now realised 681 (681)
    Cancellation of Share Premium (65,230) 65,230
    Total other movements (65,230) 65,230 681 (681)
    Balance as at 31 January 2025 956 62,281 299,284 191 (25,949) 153,438 (7,638) 482,563

    1 Included within these reserves is an amount of £265,697,000 (2024: £244,846,000) which is considered distributable to shareholders under Companies Act rules. The Income Taxes Act 2007 restricts distribution of capital from reserves created by the conversion of the share premium account into a special distributable reserve until the third anniversary of the share allotment that led to the creation of that part of the share premium account. As at 31 January 2025, £19,920,000 (2024: £34,910,000) of the special reserve is distributable under this restriction.
    2The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

      Share capital

    £’000

    Share premium

    £’000

    Special distributable reserves1

    £’000

    Capital redemption reserve

    £’000

    Capital reserve realised1

    £’000

    Capital reserve unrealised

    £’000

    Revenue reserve1

    £’000

    Total

    £’000

    As at 1 February 2023 657 78,440 174,061 159 (20,136) 119,032 (2,720) 349,493
    Total comprehensive income for the year (6,477) 9,3332 (3,291)2 (435)
    Total contributions by and distributions to owners:                
    Repurchase and cancellation of own shares (13) (6,743) 13 (6,743)
    Issue of shares 129 70,927 71,056
    Share issue cost (3,912) (3,912)
    Dividends paid (19,165) (19,165)
    Total contributions by and distributions to owners: 116 67,015 (25,908) 13 41,236
    Other movements:                
    Prior year fixed asset losses now realised 11,338 (11,338)
    Cancellation of Share Premium (117,979) 117,979
    Total other movements (117,979) 117,979 11,338 (11,338)
    Balance as at 31 January 2024 773 27,476 266,132 172 (15,275) 117,0272 (6,011)2 390,294

    1 Reserves considered distributable to shareholders per the Companies Act.
    2 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

    CASH FLOW STATEMENT

        Year to

    31 January 2025
    £’000

    Year to

    31 January 2024
    £’000

    Cash flows from operating activities      
    Profit/(loss) before tax   24,110 (435)
    Adjustments for:      
    Decrease/(increase) in debtors1   (10)1 4,6222
    (Decrease)/increase in creditors   6,454 (8,490)
    (Gain)/loss on disposal of fixed asset investments   (1,226) 876
    Gain on valuation of fixed asset investments   (37,666) (9,317)2
    Loss/(Gain) on valuation of current asset investments   574 (17)
    Transfer of accrued loan interest receivable2   (1,824)2
    Net cash utilised in operating activities   (7,764) (14,585)

    Cash flows from investing activities

         
    Purchase of fixed asset investments   (47,131) (32,975)
    Proceeds on sale of fixed asset investments   21,713 18,292
    Purchase of current asset investments   (4,499)
    Net cash utilised in investing activities   (25,418) (19,182)
    Cash flows from financing activities      
    Movement in applications account   7,928 (409)
    Purchase of own shares   (8,981) (6,743)
    Proceeds from share issues   100,951 66,543
    Cost of share issues   (5,982) (3,912)
    Dividends paid (net of DRIS)   (17,829) (14,653)
    Net cash generated from financing activities   76,087 40,826
    Increase in cash and cash equivalents   42,905 7,059
    Opening cash and cash equivalents   61,670 54,611
    Closing cash and cash equivalents   104,575 61,670
    Cash and cash equivalents comprise      
    Cash at bank   4,251 4,868
    Applications cash   16,780 8,852
    Money market funds   83,544 47,950
    Closing cash and cash equivalents   104,575 61,670

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

    1 Movement in debtors, adjusted for £1,170,000 of deferred consideration proceeds.
    2 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    1. Significant accounting policies

    Apollo is a Public Limited Company (plc) incorporated in England and Wales and its registered office is 33 Holborn, London, EC1N 2HT.

    Apollo’s principal activity is to invest in a diverse portfolio of predominantly unquoted companies with the aim of providing shareholders with attractive tax-free dividends and long-term capital growth.

    Basis of preparation
    The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for the measurement at fair value of certain financial instruments, and in accordance with UK Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (GAAP), including Financial Reporting Standard 102 – ‘The Financial Reporting Standard applicable in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland’ (FRS 102), and with the Companies Act 2006 and the Statement of Recommended Practice (SORP) ‘Financial Statements of Investment Trust Companies and Venture Capital Trusts (issued 2014 and updated in July 2022)’.

    The significant accounting policies have remained unchanged since those set out in Apollo’s 2024 Annual Report and Accounts.

    2. Investment income
    Accounting policy

    Fixed returns on non-equity shares and debt securities are recognised on a time apportionment basis (including time amortisation of any premium or discount to redemption), so as to reflect the effective interest rate, provided it is considered probable that payment will be received in due course. Income from fixed-interest securities and deposit interest is accounted for on an effective interest rate method. Investment income includes interest earned on MMFs. Dividend income is shown net of any related tax credit.

    Dividends receivable are brought into account when Apollo’s right to receive payment is established and it is probable that payment will be received. Fixed returns on debt are recognised provided it is probable that payment will be received in due course. The nature of dividends received is assessed to establish whether they are revenue or income dividends.

    Disclosure

      31
    January
    31
    January
      2025 2024
      £’000 £’000
    Loan note interest receivable1 163 1
    Dividends receivable
    MMF interest income
    741
    3,178
    576
    2,000
      4,082 2,5761

    1 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts.

    3. Investment management and performance fees

      31 January 2025 31 January 2024
      Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
      £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
    Investment management fee 2,147 6,442 8,589 1,862 5,587 7,449
    Investment performance fee 6,139 6,139 14 14
      2,147 12,581 14,728 1,862 5,601 7,463

    For the purpose of the revenue and capital columns in the Income Statement, the management fee has been allocated 25% to revenue and 75% to capital, in line with the Board’s expected long-term split of returns in the form of income and capital gains respectively from Apollo’s investment portfolio. The investment performance fee, explained below, is allocated 100% to capital as it is deemed that capital appreciation on investments has primarily driven the total return of Apollo above the required hurdle rate at which the performance fee is payable. The management fee, administration and accountancy fees are calculated based on the NAV which is then multiplied by the number of shares in issue, calculated on a daily basis.

    Octopus provide investment management, accounting and administration services and company secretarial services to Apollo under a management agreement which may be terminated at any time thereafter by not less than twelve months’ notice given by either party. No compensation is payable in the event of terminating the agreement by either party, if the required notice period is given. The fee payable, should insufficient notice be given, will be equal to the fee that would have been paid should continuous service be provided. The basis upon which the management fee is calculated is disclosed within the Annual Report and financial statements.

    Apollo has established a performance incentive scheme whereby the Portfolio Manager is entitled to an annual performance related incentive fee in the event that certain performance criteria are met. Further details of this scheme are disclosed within the Annual Report and financial statements. As at 31 January 2025 £6,139,076 was due to the Portfolio Manager by way of an annual performance fee (2024: £14,000).

    4. Other expenses
    Accounting policy

    All expenses are accounted for on an accruals basis. Expenses are charged wholly to revenue, apart from management fees charged 75% to capital and 25% to revenue, performance fees charged wholly to capital and transaction costs. Transaction costs incurred when purchasing or selling assets are written off to the Income Statement in the period that they occur.

    Disclosure

      31
    January
    31
    January
      2025 2024
      £’000 £’000
    Accounting and administration services 1,288 1,117
    Ongoing trail commission 1,130 1,011
    Directors’ fees 182 140
    Registrars’ fees 120 106
    Audit fees 103 85
    Legal fees 50 12
    Bad debt provision 0 953
    Other administration expenses 682 582
      3,555 4,006

    The ongoing charges ratio of Apollo for the year to 31 January 2025 was 2.4% (2024: 2.4%). Total annual running costs are capped at 2.75% of average net assets (2024 cap: 2.75% of average net assets). This figure excludes any extraordinary items, adviser charges, impairment of interest and performance fees.

    No non-audit services were provided by Apollo’s auditor.

    5. Tax
    Accounting policy

    Current tax is recognised for the amount of income tax payable in respect of the taxable profit/(loss) for the current or past reporting periods using the current UK corporation tax rate. The tax effect of different items of income/gain and expenditure/loss is allocated between capital and revenue return on the “marginal” basis as recommended in the SORP.

    Deferred tax is recognised in respect of all timing differences at the reporting date. Timing differences are differences between taxable profits and total comprehensive income as stated in the financial statements that arise from the inclusion of income and expenses in tax assessments in periods different from those in which they are recognised in financial statements.

    Deferred tax assets are only recognised to the extent that it is probable that they will be recovered against the reversal of deferred tax liabilities or other future taxable profits.

    Disclosure

      31 January 2025 31 January 2024
      Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
      £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000 £’000
    Profit/(loss) before tax1 (1,627) 25,737 24,110 2,8561 (3,290)1 (435)
    Tax at 25% (2024: 24%)1 (407) 6,434 6,027 6861 (791)1 (104)
    Effects of:            
    Non-taxable dividend income (9) (9) (16) (16)
    Non-taxable capital gains on valuations and disposals1 (9,579) (9,579) (2,032)1 (2,032)1
    Expenses not deductible for tax purposes 12 12 14 14
    Excess management expenses on which deferred tax not recognised1 416 3,133 3,549 1,3321 8061 2,1381
                 
    Total tax charge

    1 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    Approved VCTs are exempt from tax on chargeable gains. Since the Directors intend that Apollo will continue to conduct its affairs so as to maintain its approval as a VCT, no deferred tax has been provided in respect of any capital gains or losses arising on the revaluation or disposal of investments based on a prospective tax rate of 25%. Unrelieved tax losses of £64,803,000 (2024: £51,785,000) are estimated to be carried forward at 31 January 2025 (subject to completion of Apollo’s tax return) and are available for offset against future taxable income, subject to agreement with HMRC. Apollo has not recognised the deferred tax asset of £16,201,000 (2024: £12,946,000) in respect of these tax losses because there is insufficient forecast taxable income in excess of deductible expenses to utilise these losses carried forward. There is no expiry period on these deductible expenses under the UK HMRC legislation.

    6. Dividends
    Accounting policy

    Dividends payable are recognised as distributions in the financial statements when Apollo’s liability to make payment has been established. This liability is established on the record date, the date on which those shareholders on the share register are entitled to the dividend. Interim dividends to equity shareholders are declared by the Directors.

    Disclosure

      31
    January
    31
    January
      2025 2024
      £’000 £’000
    Dividends paid in the year    
    Second interim dividend: 1.3p per share paid 2 May 2024 (2024: 1.3p per share) in respect of prior year 10,901 8,739
    Interim dividend: 1.3p per share paid 20 December 2024 (2024: 1.4p) in respect of the current year 12,196 10,426
      23,097 19,165
         
      31
    January
    31
    January
      2025 2024
      £’000 £’000
    Dividends in respect of the year    
    Interim dividend: 1.3p per share paid 20 December 2024 (2024: 1.4p) 12,196 10,426
    Second interim dividend: 1.3p paid 8 May 2025 (2024: 1.3p per share) 13,663 10,901
      25,859 21,327
    The figures above include dividends elected to be reinvested through the DRIS. In the year to 31 January 2025, the net proceeds reinvested through the DRIS totalled £5,268,000 (2024: £4,513,000).

    7. Earnings per share

      31 January 2025 31 January 2024
      Revenue Capital Total Revenue Capital Total
    Profit/(loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders (£’000)1 (1,627) 25,737 24,110 (3,291)1 2,8561 (435)1
    Earnings per ordinary share (p)1 (0.2p) 3.0p 2.8p (0.5p)1 0.4p1 (0.1p)1

    1 The presentation and classification of £3.5 million of accrued loan interest was updated to be part of the fair value of investments. This balance is therefore an amendment to the balance presented in the 31 January 2024 accounts. This had no impact on the overall loss for the year presented or net asset value.

    The earnings per share is based on 867,758,701 Ordinary shares (2024: 709,769,066), being the weighted average of shares in issue during the year.

    There are no potentially dilutive capital instruments in issue and, as such, the basic and diluted earnings per share are identical.

    8. Net asset value per share

      31
    January
    31
    January
      2025 2024
      Ordinary shares Ordinary shares
    Net assets (£) 482,563,000 390,294,000
    Shares in issue 956,172,843 772,743,612
    Net asset value per share (p) 50.5 50.5

    There are no potentially dilutive capital instruments in issue and, as such, the basic and diluted NAV per share are identical.

    9. Transactions with the Portfolio Manager

    Apollo has employed Octopus throughout the year as the Portfolio Manager. Apollo has incurred £8,589,000 (2024: £7,449,000) in management fees due to the Portfolio Manager in the year. At 31 January 2025 there was £2,295,000 outstanding (2024: £1,989,000). The management fee is payable quarterly in arrears and is based on 2% of the NAV calculated daily from 31 January.

    The Portfolio Manager is entitled to an annual performance-related incentive fee, subject to the total return (NAV plus cumulative dividends paid) per share being at least 100p at the end of the relevant period. This performance fee is equal to 20% of the amount by which the NAV plus cumulative dividends paid per share exceeds the higher of:

    • The highest total return in previous accounting periods. This is currently the return in the year to 31 January 2024 (137.9p).
    • The total return as at 1 February 2012, plus the average Bank of England interest rate to date, commencing 1 February 2012.

    The Board considers that the liability becomes due at the point that the performance criteria are met, which has happened at the end of this financial year. In the year, Apollo incurred performance fees of £6,139,076 (2024: £14,000). At 31 January 2025 there were £6,139,076 of outstanding performance fees to be paid (2024: £14,000).
    The Portfolio Manager also provides accounting and administrative services to Apollo, payable quarterly in arrears, for a fee of 0.3% of the NAV calculated daily. During the year £1,288,000 (2024: £1,117,000) was paid to the Portfolio Manager, of which £344,000 (2024: £298,000) was outstanding at the Balance Sheet date, for the accounting and administrative services. In addition, the Portfolio Manager also provides company secretarial services for a fee of £20,000 per annum (2024: £20,000).

    Several members of the Octopus investment team hold Non-Executive Directorships as part of their monitoring roles in Apollo’s portfolio companies, but they have no controlling interests in those companies. The Portfolio Manager receives transaction fees and directors’ fees from these portfolio companies. During the year ended 31 January 2025, Directors’ fees of £788,000 attributable to the investments of Apollo were received by the Portfolio Manager (2024: £821,000).

    Octopus AIF Management Limited remuneration disclosures (unaudited)
    Quantitative remuneration disclosures required to be made in this annual report in accordance with the FCA Handbook FUND 3.3.5 are available on the website: https://www.octopusinvestments.com/remuneration-disclosures/.

    10. Related party transactions

    As at 31 January 2025, Octopus Investments Nominees Limited (OINL) held 315 shares (2024: 315) in Apollo as beneficial owner, having purchased these from shareholders to protect their interests after delays or errors with shareholder instructions and other similar administrative issues. Throughout the period to 31 January 2025 OINL purchased nil shares (2024: 315) at a cost of nil (2024: £163) and sold nil shares (2024: 173,900) for proceeds of nil (2024: £87,993). This is classed as a related party transaction as per the Listing Rules, as Octopus, the Portfolio Manager, and OINL are part of the same group of companies. Any such future transactions, where OINL takes over the legal and beneficial ownership of Company shares will be announced to the market and disclosed in annual and half-yearly reports.

    11. 2025 financial information

    The figures and financial information for the year ended 31 January 2025 are extracted from the Company’s annual financial statements for the period and do not constitute statutory accounts. The Company’s annual financial statements for the year to 31 January 2025 have been audited but have not yet been delivered to the Registrar of Companies. The Auditors’ report on the 2025 annual financial statements was unqualified, did not include a reference to any matter to which the auditors drew attention without qualifying the report, and did not contain any statements under Sections 498(2) or 498(3) of the Companies Act 2006.

    12. 2024 financial information

    The figures and financial information for the year ended 31 January 2024 are extracted from the Company’s annual financial statements for the period and do not constitute statutory accounts. The Company’s annual financial statements for the year to 31 January 2024 have been audited but have not yet been delivered to the Registrar of Companies. The Auditors’ report on the 2024 annual financial statements was unqualified, did not include a reference to any matter to which the auditors drew attention without qualifying the report, and did not contain any statements under Sections 498(2) or 498(3) of the Companies Act 2006.

    13. Annual Report and financial statements
    The Annual Report and financial statements will be posted to shareholders in June and will be available on the Company’s website. The Notice of Annual General Meeting is contained within the Annual Report.

    14. General information
    Registered in England & Wales. Company No. 05840377
    LEI: 213800Y3XEIQ18DP3O53

    15. Directors
    Murray Steele (Chair), Christopher Powles, Alex Hambro, Claire Finn and Gillian Elcock.

    16. Secretary and registered office
    Octopus Company Secretarial Services Limited
    6th Floor, 33 Holborn, London EC1N 2HT

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Note to Correspondents: on signing Agreement concerning the Chagos Islands

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    The Secretary-General welcomes the signing of Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the Republic of Mauritius concerning the Chagos Archipelago including Diego Garcia.

    This agreement marks a significant step towards resolving a long-standing dispute in the Indian Ocean region and demonstrates the value of diplomacy in addressing historical grievances.

    The Secretary-General urges both parties to continue engaging in constructive discussions to ensure that the rights and aspirations of the Chagossian people are fully respected and upheld.

    The United Nations remains committed to supporting both countries in this process.
     

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Joint Communique: UK-Mauritius Strategic Partnership Framework

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    Joint Communique: UK-Mauritius Strategic Partnership Framework

    Communiqué on the establishment of a Strategic Partnership Framework between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Republic of Mauritius.

    Today, with the conclusion of the agreement on the exercise of sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago, relations between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Republic of Mauritius enter a new era. In recognition of this, we – the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs for the United Kingdom, and the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Regional Integration and International Trade for Mauritius – agree to a new Strategic Partnership Framework, to cement and boost our flourishing relationship for the benefit of both nations.

    The United Kingdom and Mauritius enjoy deep historical ties and strong partnerships across a full range of shared strategic interests including economic growth, security, and climate change. We are both Commonwealth democracies, committed to upholding human rights, the rule of law, and the rules-based international system.

    Our new governments will work together to deliver the clear mandates for reform we were given in our elections last year, to support the change our people want to see. In agreeing to this partnership, we also demonstrate our continued shared commitment to the pursuit of a free and rules-based Indo-Pacific that delivers security and prosperity for all.

    From 2025, the United Kingdom and Mauritius will strengthen our cooperation, addressing the challenges and seizing the opportunities of our time, with a particular focus on: boosting mutual economic growth and trade, strengthening the international rules-based system, reinforcing maritime security, and tackling climate change.

    Building on our vibrant bilateral trade relationship currently worth £1.2 billion annually, we will increase mutual trade and investment to boost long-term growth for both our countries, supporting Mauritius’s aim to transition to a high income country and putting more money into hardworking people’s pockets. This will include:

    • deepening our existing trade relationship under the United Kingdom-Eastern and Southern Africa Economic Partnership Agreement

    • maximising growth and development by cooperating on competitive financing through UK Export Finance, with at least £5 billion in market risk appetite, to deliver British business opportunities and growth and jobs in Mauritius

    • new government-to-government initiatives on digital trade and health, and a United Kingdom/Mauritius Business Forum

    • delivering a set of formal partnerships with Mauritian and British institutions across priority sectors, including hospitals, the civil and public service, universities, and City of London financial institutions

    We also commit to work together to strengthen the international rules-based system and in particular to build resilience against corruption and illicit finance, including by enhancing Mauritius’s status as a regional financial hub and instilling further confidence in Mauritius as an investment destination. This will include:

    • developing a bilateral Economic Security Partnership to counter corruption and illicit finance, including measures to support Mauritius’s next Financial Action Taskforce review
    • expanding law enforcement cooperation, in particular cyber training and investigations, to reduce crime

    • identifying opportunities for Mauritian judicial reform and support

    We will explore ways to strengthen our democracies and shared values by forging deeper connections between our Parliaments and increasing our collaboration in international and multilateral fora such as the Commonwealth and regional Indian Ocean organisations.

    On maritime security and irregular migration, we will deepen our cooperation to fight the scourges of irregular migration, drugs trafficking, piracy, and illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing, supporting safer streets in our countries and protecting mutual prosperity. This will include:

    • cooperation agreements and capacity building to secure Mauritius’s Exclusive Economic Zone

    • consideration of patrolling capability across the Chagos Archipelago to support a secure maritime domain

    • cooperation to counter and manage irregular migration

    • provision of training and institutional partnerships to boost Mauritian maritime security capability and strengthen fisheries protection

    We further commit to tackle one of the defining global challenges of our time together: climate change. Our shared objectives are to deliver Mauritius’s transition to energy independence through sustainable renewable energy, to protect biodiversity including rare indigenous species, and to increase Mauritius’s long-term climate resilience. This will include:

    • a £12 million Access to Climate Finance programme, to unlock hundreds of millions of pounds through private sector partnerships and international green funds

    • mitigation and adaptation projects to tackle the immediate effects of climate change including coral restoration, coastal erosion and indigenous species conservation

    • technical expertise to develop and manage the Chagos Archipelago Marine Protected Area, pursuant to the agreement on the exercise of sovereignty over the Chagos Archipelago

    The new UK-Mauritius Strategic Partnership Framework will provide a comprehensive mechanism for delivering, together, for our countries. Our Ministers will meet in the coming months to finalise the partnership and will then meet in an Annual Strategic Dialogue to review and keep evolving it as necessary to support the security and prosperity of our countries into the future.

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: Sen. Chuck Payne Appointed to Interim Committees and State Commissions

    Source: US State of Georgia

    ATLANTA (May 22, 2025)—Lt. Gov. Burt Jones has appointed Sen. Chuck Payne (R–Dalton) to serve on the following committees and commissions:

    • Career and Technical Education Advisory Commission (Co-Chairperson)
    • Education Commission of the States
    • Georgia Commission on Civics Education
    • High School Athletics Overview Committee
    • Joint Georgia Hall of Fame Authority Overview Committee
    • Joint Recreational Authorities Overview Committee
    • Southern States Energy Board

    Sen. Chuck Payne spoke on the appointments, saying, “I’m grateful to Lt. Governor Burt Jones for these appointments and for his trust in me to serve. Promoting education, advancing student athletics and supporting Georgia’s parks and recreational spaces are issues I look forward to seeing reflected through these committees and commissions. These are areas where thoughtful policy can make a difference in people’s lives, and I’m honored to continue this important work on behalf of my district and the people of Georgia.”

    Each appointment is effective immediately and will extend for two years, aligning with the remainder of Sen. Payne’s term in the Georgia Senate.

    # # # #

    Sen. Chuck Payne serves as Chairman of the Senate Committee on Veterans, Military, and Homeland Security. He represents the 54th Senate District, which includes Whitfield and Murray County as well as part of Gordon County. He may be reached at 404.463.5402 or by email at Chuck.Payne@senate.ga.gov.

    For all media inquiries, please reach out to SenatePressInquiries@senate.ga.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: ASIA/LEBANON – “An end to the war in Gaza; Syrians must be given the opportunity to return to their country”

    Source: Agenzia Fides – MIL OSI

    CNS photo/Mychel Akl for Maronite Catholic Patriarchate

    Beirut (Agenzia Fides) – “The Maronite bishops hope and pray for an end to the war in the Gaza Strip, which is causing death, hunger, disease, and epidemics among the civilian population, and call on the international community to exert pressure on all parties to the conflict to find just solutions,” said the Maronite bishops of Lebanon in a communiqué issued at the end of their monthly meeting at the Patriarch’s residence in Bkerke. The meeting was presided over by Cardinal Béchara Boutros Raï, Patriarch of Antioch of the Maronites. Also present were the Superiors General of the Maronite monastic orders.The Maronite bishops expressed their joy at the election of Pope Leo XIV: “We congratulate His Holiness Pope Leo XIV on assuming the Petrine ministry as head of the Catholic Church,” the bishops stated.The bishops of the Maronite community declare that they are following “with great interest the acceleration of political and diplomatic events in the Middle East and their possible repercussions for Lebanon” and add that, in their opinion, Lebanon “faces a unique opportunity on the path to security and reform that should be seized.” They therefore call on those responsible for the government in Beirut “to take the decisive measures expected by all Lebanese regarding the recovery of the State and its exclusive authority on fundamental and vital issues.”With renard to the situation in Syria, the Maronite bishops express “their satisfaction at the lifting of the financial and economic sanctions imposed on Syria.” “This,” they emphasize, “will have a positive impact on the security, stability, and unity of the Syrian people, enabling the country to have the necessary investment capacity to ensure jobs and economic recovery.” “This, in turn, will reduce the burden of the displacement of its populations in neighboring countries, especially Lebanon, as a prelude to their return to their homeland and their contribution to its reconstruction and development,” the bishops conclude. (L.M.) (Agenzia Fides, 22/5/2025)
    Share:

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: ASIA/CAMBODIA – Apostolic Vicar Schmitthaeusler: “Pope Leo’s presence is a source of courage, joy and communion”

    Source: Agenzia Fides – MIL OSI

    Thursday, 22 May 2025  

    Phnom Penh (Agenzia Fides) – “The young faithful in Cambodia experienced an explosion of joy on May 8th because we have a Pope, the Shepherd of the universal Church. For them and for all Cambodians, he, as the Good Shepherd, is a source of courage, joy, and communion. We are deeply moved by the motto ‘In him who is one, we are one.’ And we are impressed that he began his ministry with the greeting of the Risen Christ: Peace be with you. We sensed that this greeting of peace was addressed to us, the Cambodian faithful,” said Bishop Olivier Schmitthaeusler, Apostolic Vicar of Phnom Penh, the capital of Cambodia, in a statement to Fides, expressing the feelings of the Cambodian faithful following the election of Pope Leo XIV.”The election of the new Pope,” he reports, “took place while 300 young Cambodians were participating in a pilgrimage for the Holy Year. With the young people, we tried to let the voice of Jesus penetrate our hearts: Come and see.” “As pilgrims of hope,” he continued, “we passed through the Holy Door, prayed the Chaplet of Divine Mercy, remembered our martyrs, and venerated Mary, our Mother. And we gave thanks for the election of Pope Leo XIV. Let us ask the Lord to fill him with all his graces so that he can guide and enlighten us in this world darkened by war, consumerism, and selfishness.””The Cambodian Church today is celebrating and waiting. It is a small community that walks the paths of hope,” says the bishop, emphasizing the words courage, joy, hope.” “The Lord,” he emphasizes, “through the guidance of Pope Leo, gives us the courage to overcome the obstacles, the misery of our lives, the misfortunes of the world, the injustices in our society, which must not make us doubt God’s love and mercy for ourselves and for the world.” Furthermore, he continues, “we have in our hearts the joy of the baptized, the joy of youth, the joy of being friends of Jesus, the joy of being children of the Church of Cambodia, the joy of having a new Shepherd for our Church, the joy of having Mary as our Mother.”Finally, the Apostolic Vicar adds, “we enjoy communion with God: we are one in him, with the Holy Father and the universal Church, with our priests, our parishes, with our brothers and sisters, for we are a family loved and chosen by God, with our people.” (PA) (Agenzia Fides, 22/5/2025)
    Share:

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: China condemns Philippines’ violations in South China Sea reefs

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 22 (Xinhua) — The China Coast Guard (CCG) on Thursday slammed the Philippines’ illegal actions in the Zhubi and Tiexian reefs, calling them a violation of China’s territorial sovereignty and calling on the Philippines to immediately stop such violations.

    On Wednesday, two Philippine service vessels illegally entered waters off Zhubi Reef and Tiexian Reef without permission from the Chinese government, with some personnel illegally landing on Tiexian Reef, BOC spokesman Liu Dejun said.

    According to the official, BOC officers took action against these vessels and boarded the reef to resolve the situation in a professional, standard, reasonable and legal manner.

    However, one of the Philippine ships, ignoring multiple serious warnings from the Chinese side, approached the BOC vessel at a dangerous distance while it was on duty, which led to the collision. Liu Dejun stressed that the Philippine side bears full responsibility for the incident.

    He said China has indisputable sovereignty over the Nansha Islands and adjacent waters, adding that such actions by the Philippines seriously violate China’s territorial sovereignty, are contrary to the Declaration of Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, and undermine peace and stability in the region.

    “We call on the Philippine side to immediately stop such violations. The BOC will continue to carry out law enforcement activities in the maritime area under China’s jurisdiction to legitimately protect China’s sovereignty and rights,” the BOC official concluded. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan to cooperate in the field of investment protection

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    ALMATY, May 22 (Xinhua) — The Senate (upper house of parliament) of Kazakhstan has ratified an agreement between the governments of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan on mutual promotion and protection of investments, the Kazinform news agency reported on Thursday.

    The agreement was signed on April 19, 2024, during the official visit of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic to the capital of Kazakhstan, Astana.

    The document defines the procedure and conditions for regulating issues related to the creation of favorable investment conditions for strengthening economic cooperation between the two countries, in particular for investments by one country in the territory of another.

    Kazakhstan is Kyrgyzstan’s third largest trading partner. In 2024, trade turnover between the two countries amounted to $1.71 billion, while exports from Kazakhstan increased by 9.6 percent and amounted to $1.3 billion. According to the National Bank of Kazakhstan, in the first nine months of 2024, foreign direct investment from Kyrgyzstan amounted to $4.8 million, which is 18 percent more than in the same period of 2023. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta to Congress: Pass Legislation to Help Prevent Youth Substance Use

    Source: US State of California Department of Justice

    OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta today joined a bipartisan coalition of 39 attorneys general in urging Congressional leaders to pass the Youth Substance Use Prevention and Awareness Act, a bipartisan bill that would authorize federal grant funding for public service announcement (PSA) campaigns aimed at reducing youth substance use. In addition, the bill would promote innovation by supporting youth-led PSA contests — an approach that not only engages young people directly but also encourages peer-to-peer communication, which is shown to be highly effective. 

    “Youth substance use is a serious problem — one that affects all communities, no matter their politics,” said Attorney General Bonta. “I’m joining a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general in supporting the Youth Substance Use Prevention and Awareness Act because it can help to save lives. I urge Congress to pass this bill as quickly as possible.”

    In the letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, House Speaker Mike Johnson, and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, the attorneys general emphasize that: 

    • They are deeply involved in efforts to address substance use and addiction from every angle — criminal enforcement, civil litigation, consumer protection, public education, and prevention. 
    • The earlier an individual begins using substances, the likelier they are to develop substance use disorders later in life. That is why prevention, particularly among youth, remains an effective tool in addressing this public health and public safety crisis. 
    • By requiring annual reports on the content, reach, and outcomes of the funded campaigns, the legislation will ensure transparency, accountability, and effectiveness. 

    In sending today’s letter, Attorney General Bonta joins the attorneys general of New Hampshire, Connecticut, New York, South Dakota, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, Wyoming, American Samoa, the District of Columbia, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.

    A copy of the letter can be found here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: After 50 successful years, the European Space Agency has some big challenges ahead

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Daniel Brown, Lecturer in Astronomy, Nottingham Trent University

    Rosetta at Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. ESA/ATG medialab; Comet image: ESA/Rosetta/Navcam

    This year marks the 50th anniversary of the founding of the European Space Agency (Esa). It has launched spectacularly successful missions, but is different to other space agencies which generally represent one country. Esa is funded by 23 member states and also has cooperation agreements with nations such as Canada.

    Esa operates cutting edge spacecraft designed to monitor the Earth, as well as space telescopes that study the distant cosmos. It has launched robotic spacecraft to other planets and to objects such as comets. It is also involved in human spaceflight – training European astronauts to work on the International Space Station (ISS).

    These are hugely successful achievements. But the agency now faces challenges as competition heats up among newer space powers such as China and India.

    The history of Esa can be traced to events immediately after the second world war, when many European scientists moved to either the US or to the Soviet Union. Many of them realised that projects supported only by a single nation could not compete with those supported by the two big geopolitical players at the time.

    This motivated the physicists Pierre Auger, from France, and Edoardo Amaldi, from Italy, to propose a European organisation that would carry out space research and would be “purely scientific”.

    In 1962, two agencies were created. One of these, the European Launch Development Organisation (ELDO), would concentrate on developing a rocket. The other, the European Space Research Organisation (ESRO), would focus on developing robotic spacecraft. Both were joined together in 1975 to form the European Space Agency.

    The push to build a European rocket would eventually yield the Ariane launcher, which is operated by the French company Arianespace.

    The first satellite to be launched under the banner of the newly formed European Space Agency was Cos-B. This spacecraft was designed to monitor a high energy form of radiation called gamma rays, being emitted from objects in space.

    Esa collaborated with other space agencies on the Hubble Space Telescope.
    ESA/NASA

    In 1978, Esa cooperated with Nasa and the UK on the International Ultraviolet Explorer mission. This space telescope was designed to observe the cosmos in ultraviolet light, something that cannot be done from Earth.

    The agency would later collaborate with Nasa and the Canadian Space Agency on one of the most successful space telescopes of all time: Hubble. Launched in 1990, the Hubble Space Telescope helped confirm the expansion rate of the universe and showed that black holes are at the cores of almost all galaxies. Hubble’s stunning images also changed the way that many people saw the universe. Esa funded one of the original instruments on the space telescope, the Faint Object Camera, and provided the first two solar arrays.

    The space agency is also a partner on the revolutionary James Webb Telescope, which launched in 2021. Esa contributed two of the telescope’s instruments: the Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NirSpec) and the Mid-Infrared Instrument (Miri).

    Solar System missions

    Esa has also launched pioneering missions to other planets and objects in our solar system. The first of these was the Giotto comet explorer. This robotic spacecraft flew past Halley’s comet in 1986 and was successfully woken up in 1992 to study a comet called Grigg-Skejllerup.

    A second successful cometary mission followed when the Rosetta spacecraft entered orbit around Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko in 2014. Rosetta despatched a lander called Philae to touch down on the comet’s surface.

    Rosetta has been my favourite of all Esa achievements, simply due to the pure audacity of attempting to land on an object whose shape and composition was until then only sparsely known. In order to “land” on an object with low gravity, Philae was to have deployed harpoons that would attach the lander to the surface. These systems did not work, but the overall mission was a success, leading to high levels of engagement from the public.

    Besides comets, Esa launched one of the most successful missions to the red planet: Mars Express. The spacecraft entered orbit around Mars in 2003 and has played a key role in enhancing understanding of our planetary neighbour. It is expected to continue working until at least 2034. Mars Express also carried the ill-fated British Beagle 2 spacecraft to Mars. This was supposed to land in 2003, but contact was never established with the probe, which is presumed to have been damaged while touching down.

    In 2005, Esa’s Huygens spacecraft landed on Titan, Saturn’s largest moon. This was the furthest from Earth that a spacecraft has ever landed. These are all outward facing missions, but Esa has also had major success with projects to study what’s going on here on Earth. These include the Envisat satellite, which operated from 2002-2012, and the Sentinel series of spacecraft, which have operated from 2014 to the present.

    These have helped map agriculture and forests, understand the Earth’s climate, track ice, and monitor atmospheric ozone. In addition, the Galileo navigation satellites are providing a high precision alternative to GPS.

    Esa is also a major player in human spaceflight, having been a partner in the International Space Station project since 1993. It has built sections of the ISS, including the Columbus laboratory, launched in 2008, and the Cupola viewing window, which gives astronauts panoramic views of Earth. The agency’s astronauts regularly spend time on the ISS as crew and could even fly to the Moon under Nasa’s Artemis programme.

    Since the 1990s, Esa has frequently collaborated with Nasa – often very successfully. However, this relationship has also faced challenges. In the wake of the financial crisis, for example, Nasa cancelled its participation in several collaborative missions with Esa. Under a proposed Nasa budget this year, the US space agency may again cancel its involvement with the joint Nasa-Esa Mars Sample Return mission.

    Esa’s future

    Times have changed in the space industry since Esa’s founding 50 years ago. Major countries such as China, India and Japan all have their own space programmes. Esa faces considerable financial pressures to compete with them.

    Nevertheless, Esa is working on strengthening its space exploration and launch capabilities through the use of a commercial space port in Norway.

    It has also put together a long-term strategy for 2040. This document highlights important areas where Esa can play a major role, including protecting Earth and its climate, continued missions to explore space and also efforts to boost European growth and competitiveness.

    All this should strengthen and secure the agency for the future. Through a mixture of developing its own missions and collaborating with other agencies and commercial partners on others, Esa should be a major player in space exploration for decades to come.

    Daniel Brown does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. After 50 successful years, the European Space Agency has some big challenges ahead – https://theconversation.com/after-50-successful-years-the-european-space-agency-has-some-big-challenges-ahead-256633

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: ‘We are all lumped under one umbrella of hate’: when social attitudes change, what is life like for people who don’t agree?

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Carol Ballantine, Postdoctoral Researcher and Lecturer in Gender and Equality Studies, University College Dublin

    charactervectorart/Shutterstock

    Pseudonyms are used in this article; interviewees who asked for their real names to be used are asterisked.

    In 2016, one of us (Kath) attended New Normal, a conference in London which opposed LGBT+ rights, including lesbian parenting and gender recognition. As a lesbian parent, I was upset by what was said – and by the way people stood to applaud speakers who warned of the dangers of parents like me, while mentioning the need to “protect children”.

    Yet that conference also opened my eyes to my – and perhaps, many other people’s – lack of understanding of what it can mean to stand against the apparent state-supported, liberal consensus on such issues. On day two, the organisers appealed for help for the parents of a trans or gender-diverse child. My notes from that day read:

    The parents feel they are not listened to, and are ‘encouraged by social services’ to treat ‘her’ like a boy. But social services have only known ‘her’ for six months – so they don’t know ‘her’. The parents are told if they don’t agree to a name change, it is neglectful and that she is suicidal. The mother argues: ‘We love our daughter.’

    Unexpectedly and conflictually, I found myself relating to the parents’ story in some way. And I wondered how I would feel as a same-sex parent if I was ever in a situation where my child rejected their family as a “moral abomination”.

    These thoughts proved a starting point for Beyond Opposition – our project which, since 2020, has been looking at the lives of people who are reticent about or object to the perceived liberalising of societies’ sexual and gender laws in Great Britain, Ireland and Canada.

    The idea of this research is not to defend their positions. Nor is it to explore their politics around sexualities and genders, which we and many others do in research into anti-gender movements. Rather, we wanted to understand the experiences that might drive these politics.


    The Insights section is committed to high-quality longform journalism. Our editors work with academics from many different backgrounds who are tackling a wide range of societal and scientific challenges.


    As far back as 2012, prompted by my colleague, urban geographer Catherine Nash, I (Kath) began noticing an evolution in arguments against changes like same-sex marriage, gender recognition and relationship and sexuality education in schools – an evolution that was not always fully recognised, or even noticed, by supporters of these changes. People who objected to such societal shifts were sometimes being politicised through court cases around their work and their children’s experiences at school.

    For Beyond Opposition, we put a call out to people who opposed or had concerns about changing laws and policies related to gender, sexuality or abortion. As well as contacting organisations and activists who actively campaigned against these changes, we used social media to reach out to people who had no connections with these groups.

    In more than 160 interviews between 2020 and 2022, we explored the daily experiences of living outside the social consensus in three countries where, at the time, there was broad legal, political and social agreement in favour of same-sex marriage, abortion, gender self-identification and related policies. The surprising diversity of positions and experiences we heard not only shed new light on how societies were changing; they painted a sometimes disturbing picture of how these shifts were being challenged and resisted.

    Not all far-right

    In the 1990s in secondary school, I would have been completely open about my view on [abortion], because it was a more accepted view, I suppose … [Now] I have this view and don’t feel I can even express it [because] everyone else disagrees … I feel like I can’t even say this to anyone.

    We first met Niamh in 2021, three years after Ireland’s historic referendum to repeal one of the EU’s strictest legal barriers to abortion, which led to limited access to abortion care. Where once her anti-abortion views were considered mainstream, in Ireland and many other countries where abortion is accepted legally and socially, now her views are in the minority.

    Niamh was clear she did not regard herself as “conservative” and said she was strongly in favour of human rights. She told us: “If I have to categorise myself, I’d categorise myself as ‘pro-life’.” But she expressed frustration at how people assumed this position automatically predicted what she thought about other topics relating to gender and sexuality, explaining:

    There’s this thing that’s like: [because] you’re against abortion, you’re against same-sex marriage or against refugees coming into the country … I struggle with it because the people in my circle on social justice issues are not usually aligned with my [anti-abortion] position. They tend to have the opposite view – [mine] tends to be seen as a really conservative stance, not a rights-based stance.


    Fagreia/Shutterstock

    Niamh, like many of our interviewees, expressed views quite differently from the organisations opposing sexual and gender equalities that I (Kath) had encountered in earlier research. While those organisations were diverse, they were often aligned on abortion, same-sex marriage and gender recognition. This contrasted with the differences that people such as British woman Jane identified when we met her.

    “I wouldn’t want to sit down in a room with somebody who said gay people were going to hell,” Jane told us. “We just wouldn’t have anything to talk about.” But she also felt it would be “impossible to have a conversation with somebody who does not believe in the existence of biological sex”.

    While Jane objected to trans rights being “given primacy”, she thought of herself as different to people who are seen as anti-gender activists. Describing herself as “gender critical”, she said: “Why this is so toxic and has started to spill out into my day-to-day life is that we are all just lumped under one umbrella of hate.”

    Like many of our interviewees, Jane objected to being placed in a single category that, in her experience, carries overwhelmingly negative associations. She told us her daily life was being affected because people attributed opinions to her that she considers hateful.

    On the whole, public attitudes across the EU and Canada still favour a broadening of gender and sexual inclusion. But academic research on changing social norms relating to gender and sexuality is largely silent on how these changes can affect those who “do not agree”.

    Many of our interviewees emphasised their distance from other people who held similar views. Indeed, this sentiment of not fitting a stereotype was so common that we still have no single phrase to describe the group of people we spoke to. Common terms like “anti-gender” or “far-right” were rejected by most participants.

    Yet we found the experiences they described had a lot in common. James, in Ireland, said he “came down towards the ‘no’ side” in the 2018 Irish abortion referendum, yet the social associations of this troubled him:

    I definitely wouldn’t ever go on a pro-life parade or protest, or anything like that. I see those people [as] ultra-religious conservatives who are not free-thinking, who want to just force their opinions on other people. There’s no way I could ever want to be associated with people like that.

    While most interviewees resisted the stereotypes they say get assigned to their position, pushing back against being seen as anti-rights or anti-equalities, some did express positions more in line with a stereotypical anti-gender activist. Brian in Canada, for example, told us he was “in a pro-life Catholic Christian bubble”, and that he would not welcome gay or trans people into his home for dinner.

    ‘I don’t feel comfortable in my own house’

    Anne, a Canadian woman who described herself as a feminist with gender-critical opinions, said she had withdrawn from her volunteer work supporting survivors of sexual violence because she recognised that “my gender-critical opinions are really toxic to others”.

    But the relationship that most troubled her was with her daughter. Anne described how her home life had been significantly affected by her interest in “gender-critical” content:

    In my house, which should be the place where I feel the most comfortable, at no time do I discuss these things. If I’m watching a video with these concerns, or am online in some way with these concerns, when my daughter who lives with me comes into the room, I turn it off. So I don’t feel at all comfortable in my own house.

    Anne was distressed by the impact her gender-critical position had on her relationship with her daughter. She recognised that content she sometimes viewed was considered “toxic” by many people, including her daughter, and expressed sadness about the damage this had done to their relationship:

    It’s very saddening to me because my daughter and I are so close, but this has become a barrier. It has become a block. The only time we talked about it at length, we were both in tears.

    We heard a number of stories like Anne’s, of close relationships becoming deeply fractured by differences on such topics. These interviewees felt their positions were fundamentally opposed by family members. Some, conscious of the tensions, kept their views to themselves even in their own home. As a result of her differences with her daughter, Anne said: “I don’t speak to her about anything in order to keep peace in the house.”


    Vectorium/Shutterstock

    Ciara, a leftwing Irishwoman who voted against abortion in the 2018 referendum, described the careful way she navigated her friendships, recognising that her friend group would hold very different views to her on abortion:

    You kind of judge the friendship a little bit. Can this friendship take this news that I voted ‘no’? [Laughs] I’ve lied – I’ve told others I voted ‘yes’.

    Ciara noted that in her everyday life, it was generally assumed everybody was pro-choice – as she had once been. She was not religious and, like many of our interviewees, distanced herself from rightwing politics.

    But in her family and among her friends, being against abortion was automatically understood as being rightwing, so she kept quiet about it. This made her question herself, resulting in what she described as “a whole range of inner dilemmas”:

    You strategise – you suss out, like, how is this going to go down? How is this going to impact on this friendship? And on trust – how will I be seen?

    Keeping quiet among friends and family makes concerned, oppositional positions harder to see and understand. So, it is possible for researchers and others to deny these positions exist – and to not address their impact. Many people spoke to us on condition that their identities would be concealed – something that came across especially strongly when they spoke about their fears at work.

    ‘At work, I can’t risk my livelihood’

    Work is central to many people’s lives. Tammy* from Canada, who described herself as “not a pro-gay person, just a pro-people person”, told us she felt uncomfortable with some workplace inclusion policies, such as Pride month:

    At work, we have an app on our phone and … for gay pride, in June, the whole month is just devoted to that history, right? And it annoys me because it’s like: OK, I get it … [but] I don’t like people trying to program me.

    The promotion of LGBTQ+ rights through corporate platforms made Tammy feel suspicious. Other Beyond Opposition participants went further, fearing their jobs could be at risk.

    For Cindy, who is also from Canada and described herself as “dabbling in gender-critical feminism”, her position was out-of-line with her workplace. Her employer took positive actions to promote LGBTQ+ inclusion. She felt that to object to such actions might “risk my livelihood, so I can’t even broach the subject”.

    It was not only the owners and managers who Cindy feared would view her “as a bigot”. She also worried that colleagues might cause conflict for her if she expressed her position outside the workplace consensus.

    Like others in our research, Cindy deliberately stayed out of activism. But during her mandatory workplace training, she said: “The whole time I’m biting my tongue.” Her concern was that she might be obliged to take an action that she didn’t believe in:

    If anyone were ever to say: ‘Go around the room and say your preferred pronouns,’ I’m not sure how I would answer that because I don’t believe in the ideology of preferred pronouns. I worry that if I just said something like: ‘No thank you, I don’t believe in it,’ that might actually cause me to lose my job.

    Workplace inclusion policies, training and practices have been shown to be effective in improving workplaces in terms of their productivity and wellbeing for employees – although in some cases, they can be poorly implemented and insufficient. But some of the people we spoke to, including Tammy and Cindy, described them as “feared” and “hated”.

    Mark went even further, suggesting he was being asked to deny his “moral values” – and that his work would not be secure if he didn’t. A freelance worker in rural Ireland, Mark believed he needed to “keep his head down” with regard to his views on sexuality and abortion:

    I’m self-employed … I can say it here to you but I’m certainly not shouting about this in the pub. I depend on the milk of human kindness from people.

    Some of our interviewees have used the law to challenge employers where their jobs were lost or under threat. Most had not experienced any official sanctions – yet many feared them. Cindy said that as a result, she kept her views to herself at work: “I guess I choose harmony and peace over being right.”

    It is these “quiet concerns” at work and among family and friends – of people who are not vocal in opposition to changing laws and policies, but still act against them – that we believe are not well documented or understood. And our research shows that in their experience of being negatively labelled and having their experiences dismissed or minimised, some have been driven to look beyond their usual communities to find support for their views.


    Accogliente Design/Shutterstock

    Accidental activists

    Although most people in our study are not activists and did not seek to be public about their views, many quietly supported those who were, or engaged with them to find support for their views.

    Those who felt uncomfortable talking to people in their own circles often told us about how they had found support elsewhere. Suzy, a British woman who said she was gender critical, described the first meeting she had attended that opposed trans rights:

    I just happened to make the decision to go [to a conference run by an organisation opposing gender self-identification] on my own … I had nobody in my life at that point who was a feminist who had these views. It’s why I went by myself. And I met some really amazing women who just completely welcomed me into this world. That opened a lot of doors for me.

    Suzy’s experience was echoed by others who had concerns about trans rights or gender recognition. Such groups were not always public, and some organised in secret – something Suzy believed was unjust but necessary, because of the distance from the social consensus of people who held views like hers:

    There is a private online messaging app – you have to be invited. I had to be vetted … to make sure I was a real person – [that] I wasn’t trying to infiltrate. It’s so ridiculous that we are having to jump through these hoops just to talk about it and express our opinion about something that for a really long time was okay to think. Now all of a sudden, it’s not okay to think this way. So you’re a societal pariah.

    At the time of our interview in 2020, Suzy was actively involved in organising to oppose the proposed amendments to the UK’s Gender Recognition Act. She had moved from having “nobody in my life … who was a feminist who had those views”, to participating in an organised campaign to influence this legislation:

    I wouldn’t necessarily describe myself as an activist – I think that word is quite a bit loaded in negative connotations now … I prefer the term ‘campaigner’ because what I started to get involved in was campaigning for the law not to be changed. I wasn’t going out on marches or anything like that.

    Proposals to update the Act in line with international human rights standards stalled and then were halted in the UK from 2018 onwards, with the support of civil society campaigners including Suzy. Since then, other campaigns have had greater successes – including, most recently, a Supreme Court ruling defining “sex” as “biological sex” in the 2010 Equality Act.

    ‘I’m not saying that I am right’

    For the many people who have spent years campaigning for gender equality and to improve LGBTQ+ lives, it is possible to understand the day-to-day accounts of our interviewees as evidence of success. Many told us they could not now express opinions on others’ relationships, sexual activity or their decisions about pregnancy and parenthood in some workplaces – and sometimes even at home.

    For some interviewees, this shift was expressed as fear, where their positions were seen to negatively affect them at work even if they didn’t express them openly. They didn’t feel able to raise questions about gender and sexual equality or abortion at work or in their volunteering and organising spaces.

    It is possible to understand this shift as a welcome victory for equalities. But our research highlights that, for many people who maintain reticence to these societal changes, the ability to reconsider or change their position has been reduced by their day-to-day work, social and family experiences.

    Cindy, for example, expressed a moment of doubt about her concerns about trans rights, admitting: “I’m not saying that I am right. Like, there is the possibility I’m not …” However, this reflective stance was not encouraged by experiences of work that she described as forcing her to “bite my tongue”.

    She and others told us the implementation of inclusion policies and training in their workplaces felt paradoxical – because they’d had the effect of making their own behaviour less inclusive. Cindy admitted she was less inclined to question herself because of the way she felt her views were treated.

    Mark, the freelance worker in Ireland, considered himself “very leftwing” and said he would “always defend the underdog”. But he told us people like him were “very much put off” by what he saw as the “tactics of what now are leftwing liberal policies”. His experiences of feeling outside the consensus, and fearing a loss of employment opportunities, meant he – and others we interviewed – were less open to engaging sympathetically with the experiences of sexual- and gender-minoritised people.

    Fear, upset and discomfort from social change

    While stories like Niamh’s and Cindy’s are sometimes used to argue that transformations have “gone too far”, research does not support this argument. In fact, those “left out in the cold” are typically the LGBTQ+ people whose needs are not being met by policies like same-sex marriage (or who remain excluded from these policies), and those seeking sexual and reproductive healthcare in all its forms.

    Our interviewees do not negate this. They highlight the fear, upset and discomfort that results from social change for some people who hold firm to their positions opposing or questioning provisions such as abortion, same-sex marriage, gender recognition. In research, these everyday experiences are rarely considered beyond their political views (assumed to be rightwing) and how to explain or change them.

    Our interviewees believe their positions are frequently mis-characterised and conflated in the media and by policymakers in order to dismiss them – and therefore, that their experiences go unseen and unrecognised. And in their experience of being outsiders – feeling labelled and minimised – they may, like Suzy, find their way to actively opposing legislation and social change that benefits LGBTQ+ people and/or those who need abortion rights. Some offered quiet support to political causes, including donating their time or money.

    The world today is very different even to 2022, when we finished the Beyond Opposition interviews. The UK has seen some fundamental shifts especially regarding gender recognition, including the recent Supreme Court ruling that defined “sex” as “biological sex” in the 2010 Equality Act.

    In the US, providing affirmative care to trans children was deemed “mutilation” in recent executive orders from the president, Donald Trump, which stated that offering support to trans and gender-diverse children against their families’ will would be considered as “child abuse”.

    As the struggle for rights continues, we believe it’s essential for research, policy and practice to pay attention to the full range of impacts of the divisions that drive much of today’s politics. Experiences like those of the parents at the conference mentioned at the start of this article, who felt that affirming their child’s gender identity went against their beliefs, contribute to the shape of the world we all live in.

    It is possible to have a clear and firm view on the rights of trans and gender-diverse children, while also considering the implications for society of the experiences (as distinct from the opinions and arguments) of those who disagree. It feels important to do this now in places where some of us – lesbian parents, parents of trans kids and others – are still (somewhat) protected by the system, as we find ourselves, in the US and elsewhere, once again labelled “a danger to children”.

    For the second phase of Beyond Opposition, we brought people together from very different positions to see if they could imagine a world where they could live together, without seeking to change each other’s minds. We wanted to know if there were new ways of thinking about the problem of division, which recognised that some differences may be here to stay.

    Our intention was not to debate, negotiate or resolve their differences, but to explore the idea that it may be necessary to live together without ever agreeing on aspects related to gender, sexuality or abortion. One key outcome of these workshops was a number of moments in which participants met a complete impasse – where they had to acknowledge that their utopia could not accommodate the other person’s position at all.

    This is a starting point for important questions about not being able to change someone else’s mind, yet still needing to share places with them. We hope to write more on this subject soon.


    For you: more from our Insights series:

    To hear about new Insights articles, join the hundreds of thousands of people who value The Conversation’s evidence-based news. Subscribe to our newsletter.

    Dr. Carol Ballantine researches genders, sexualities and violence. She worked as the Ireland and UK postdoctoral researcher on Beyond Opposition, funded by the ERC.

    This article is funded by work undertaken under the ERC Grant No: 81789 granted to Kath Browne and also receives EU Horizon Europe funding. She has worked for LGBTQIA+ organisations is affiliated with LinQ.

    ref. ‘We are all lumped under one umbrella of hate’: when social attitudes change, what is life like for people who don’t agree? – https://theconversation.com/we-are-all-lumped-under-one-umbrella-of-hate-when-social-attitudes-change-what-is-life-like-for-people-who-dont-agree-253464

    MIL OSI – Global Reports