Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Fresh protests from European farmers – E-001000/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is fully aware of the challenges faced by farmers such as the drought conditions in Romania.

    To address these challenges, the Vision for Agriculture and Food presented on 19 February 2025[1] contains an ambitious roadmap and different work streams towards an agri-food system that is attractive, competitive, sustainable and fair for current and future generations, including trade and simplification.

    Trade agreements, like the EU-MERCOSUR Partnership Agreement, strike a balance between both the EU offensive and defensive interests of the agri-food sector.

    Trade agreements open new export opportunities for the EU agri-food sector, to the benefit of EU farmers income. At the same time the EU agri-food sector relies on imports from third countries.

    Moreover, imported products need to fully comply with EU sanitary and phyto-sanitary standards (SPS). These standards include the ban of hormones in cattle raising in both domestic and imported products.

    The current autonomous trade measures[2] for Ukraine include strengthened safeguards setting caps on imports of certain agricultural products from Ukraine. They helped stabilising markets and provide stability and predictability for farmers on both sides.

    Meanwhile, the Commission continues its efforts to simplify the delivery of the current Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in view of reducing the administrative burden and providing more flexibility to farmers and national administrations. The second simplification package of the current CAP is expected for the second quarter of 2025.

    • [1]  https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/vision-agriculture-food_en#:~:text=Shaping%20the%20future%20of%20farming%20and%20the%20agri-food,entire%20value%20chain%20within%20the%20EU%20and%20globally
    • [2]  Regulation (EU) 2024/1392 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 on temporary trade-liberalisation measures supplementing trade concessions applicable to Ukrainian products under the Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part (ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1392/oj).
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Definition of antisemitism – E-000044/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has made combating antisemitism and hate a political priority. There is no place for antisemitism or any form of hatred and violence in the EU[1].

    The Commission recommends the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition as a practical guidance and useful tool, in particular for education and training purposes for teachers, Non-Governmental Organisations, state authorities and the media in line with the 2024 Council declaration on fostering Jewish life and combating antisemitism[2], the 2022 Council Conclusions on combating racism and antisemitism[3] and the 2018 EU Council declaration on combating antisemitism[4].

    As also stated in the first progress report of the EU Strategy on combating antisemitism and fostering Jewish life[5], to date, 25 Member States have adopted or endorsed the IHRA working definition of antisemitism[6].

    The IHRA definition states that criticism of Israel similar to that levelled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Israel-related antisemitism is the most frequent form experienced online[7] and the EU is working towards an EU free from antisemitism.

    The non-legally binding working definition of antisemitism by the IHRA serves as a benchmark for the Commission’s work to combat antisemitism. EU funding is used for projects in line and for the implementation of the EU Strategy on combating antisemitism and fostering Jewish life.

    • [1] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-14245-2024-INIT/en/pdf
    • [2] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2024/10/15/fostering-jewish-life-and-combating-antisemitism-council-approves-declaration/
    • [3] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/03/04/council-adopts-conclusions-on-combating-racism-and-antisemitism/
    • [4] https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/12/06/fight-against-antisemitism-council-declaration/
    • [5] https://commission.europa.eu/strategy-and-policy/policies/justice-and-fundamental-rights/combatting-discrimination/racism-and-xenophobia/combating-antisemitism/eu-strategy-combating-antisemitism-and-fostering-jewish-life-2021-2030/first-progress-report-eu-strategy-combating_en
    • [6] https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism
    • [7] https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2018/experiences-and-perceptions-antisemitism-second-survey-discrimination-and-hate, p. 25.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Implementation of Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rulings – E-000922/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission will continue to use all the means at its disposal to ensure the correct application of EU free movement law, including addressing specific difficulties preventing LGBTIQ people and their families from enjoying their rights. In each specific case, the Commission makes use of the tools considered most effective for ensuring the protection of rights.

    The Commission has been raising awareness about the Coman judgment[1] (C-673/16) since its delivery by the Court, and has been monitoring its implementation in all Member States, in particular through discussions in dedicated fora.

    The Commission is in contact with Romania regarding its application of EU free movement law. While the impact of the provisions of national law under discussion may be greater for rainbow families, they have a broader scope and must be addressed in their entirety.

    The Commission understands that a draft legislation relevant to these discussions is currently under discussion in the Romanian Parliament, and will continue to closely monitor the developments.

    The Commission is also closely monitoring the implementation of the Mirin judgment[2] ( C-4/23) , delivered on 4 October 2024. The Commission contacted Romanian authorities in February 2025 inquiring about the measures to be taken in that regard. A reply is still pending.

    • [1] C-673/16, Coman, ECLI:EU:C:2018:385.
    • [2] C-4/23, Mirin, ECLI:EU:C:2024:845.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Waste water management and use of NRRP funds in the province of Caltanissetta: investigation into water treatment failures and suspicious financial flows – E-001303/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Almost all the agglomerations of the province of Caltanissetta are concerned by an ongoing infringement procedure for failure to comply with the Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive (UWWTD)[1].

    In that province, 13 agglomerations[2] are covered by the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)[3] that found Italy in breach of the UWWTD.

    In this regard, the replies submitted by Italy between 2022 and 2025 are under assessment and the Commission will decide in due course on the next steps to be taken.

    For three more agglomerations[4] covered by another case, the Commission decided in March 2024 to lodge an application with the CJEU[5]. In a third case[6], Italy was condemned on 31 May 2018[7] to pay a penalty payment for every six months of delay.

    In May 2022, there were still 66 non-compliant agglomerations, including Niscemi, corresponding to a penalty payment of EUR 22 562 033.

    Member States are primarily responsible for the application and correct implementation of EU law. The Commission will continue to monitor the implementation of the directive in the province of Caltanissetta in the context of the above-mentioned procedures.

    The Italian Recovery and Resilience Plan (RRP)[8] supports a number of projects on waste water to reduce the number of equivalent inhabitants residing in agglomerations non-compliant with the UWWTD[9] under investment M2C4.I4.4.

    Regarding this investment, the Commission positively assessed milestone M2C4-36 on the assignment of funding to project proposals in the context of the fifth payment request.

    The subsequent targets M2C4-37 and M2C4-38 on the reduction of number of equivalent inhabitants residing in agglomerations non-compliant with the UWWTD will be assessed after the submission of the relevant future payment requests.

    • [1] Council Directive of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (91/271/EEC), consolidated version, OJ L 135 30.5.1991, p. 40.
    • [2] San Cataldo Consortile, Butera, Campofranco, Delia, Gela, Marianopoli, Mazzarino, Milena, Montedoro, Serradifalco, Sommatino, Sutera, and Villalba in the framework of INFR(2014)2059. T his case covers over 600 agglomerations throughout the Italian territory.
    • [3] Judgment of the Court of 6 October 2021, Case C-668/19, European Commission v Italian Republic, ECLI:EU:C:2021:815.
    • [4] Vallelunga Pratameno, Santa Caterina Villarmosa, and Mussomeli in the framework of INFR(2017)2181. This case covers 179 agglomerations throughout the Italian territory.
    • [5] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_1234. The case is currently pending (C-594/24).
    • [6] INFR(2004)2034.
    • [7] Judgment of the Court of 31 May 2018, Case C-251/17, European Commission v Italian Republic, ECLI:EU:C:2018:358.
    • [8] https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility/country-pages/italys-recovery-and-resilience-plan_en
    • [9] Council Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 concerning urban waste-water treatment, OJ L 135, 30.5.1991, p. 40-52.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Greece’s potential contribution to the EU green hydrogen strategy – E-000870/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Greece started long-term planning of its future hydrogen infrastructure development within the European Ten-Year Network Development Plan[1].

    The Greek hydrogen backbone project, which aims at connecting the future hydrogen production sites with Greek off-takers and European markets, is included in the Union list of Projects of Common Interest (PCIs) and Projects of Mutual Interest (PMIs)[2]. PCI status helps project development by providing streamlined permitting processes, and priority regulatory treatment.

    Given its PCI status, the Greek hydrogen backbone project is for example eligible for the financial support under the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) under certain conditions.

    In 2025, the Commission allocated EUR 5.4 million to the project under CEF to support DESFA, the Greek transmission system operator, with studies that are necessary to realise this investment.

    The CEF support will de-risk and accelerate the project. Renewable hydrogen can be supported with the Modernisation Fund and Greece can take part in the auctions-as-a-service of the European Hydrogen Bank auctions under the Innovation Fund.

    The Commission is also in contact with the Greek administration for example within the context of Greece’s implementation of its recovery and resilience plan (RRP), which includes hydrogen-related actions[3].

    In addition, Greece like other Member States will need to transpose the recent EU hydrogen legislation, which includes the sectoral consumption targets for industry and transport under the revised Renewable Energy Directive[4] and the recast Gas Directive[5].

    The Commission is supporting Member States in this work through different means[6].

    • [1] https://www.entsog.eu/tyndp#entsog-ten-year-network-development-plan-2024
    • [2] https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_6047
    • [3] The Greek RRP includes a relevant reform on the framework for hydrogen, which shall include licensing and permitting procedures.
    • [4] Directive (EU) 2023/2413, transposition deadline 21 May 2025.
    • [5] Directive (EU) 2024/1788, transposition deadline 5 August 2026.
    • [6] This includes workshops on the consumption targets under the Renewable Energy Directive and a Q&A tool for Member States administrations on the Gas Directive.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Ensuring fair competition for farmers in the EU agricultural market in the future – E-000958/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is currently working on the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) and intends to present a proposal in July 2025.

    The Commission communication on the road to the next MFF highlights the importance of food security and nature protection for sustaining Europe’s quality of life and emphasises that a Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) that is fit for purpose must provide targeted support to farmers who need it most, work within planetary boundaries supporting positive environmental and social outcomes through rewards and incentives for ecosystem services and support the right enabling conditions for thriving rural areas.

    It must become simpler, targeted and find the right balance between incentives, investment and regulation, and ensure that farmers have a fair and sufficient income.

    The Vision for Agriculture and Food adopted on 19 February 2025[1] provides more details on how the future CAP will address the challenges and needs of the EU agrifood sector and rural areas.

    • [1] https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/overview-vision-agriculture-food/vision-agriculture-and-food_en
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – The urgent need to protect the Balkan lynx – E-001038/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Albania and North Macedonia, as EU candidate countries, and Kosovo*[1], as a potential candidate, are all expected to gradually align with the EU environmental acquis, including EU nature protection legislation such as the Birds[2] and Habitats[3] Directives.

    Both Albania and North Macedonia are also Contracting Parties to the Convention on the Conservation of European Wildlife and Natural Habitats[4] and must comply with its requirements, particularly the strict protection provisions benefiting the Balkan Lynx, since the species is listed in its Appendix II.

    The Commission closely monitors the efforts of enlargement countries and regularly discusses the proper alignment with the EU nature protection acquis with national authorities.

    The Commission further provides guidance and recommendations to ensure a swift and efficient alignment, among others by means of the annual enlargement reports.

    In the nature protection section of these reports, the Commission repeatedly stresses that it remains essential for the countries to advance quickly with the identification and pre-designation of sites that will be covered by the Natura 2000 network.

    The Commission will continue to monitor and push for sufficient implementation and enforcement capacities at central level in all candidate countries and potential candidates.

    • [1] *This designation is without prejudice to positions on status and is in line with UNSCR 1244/1999 and the ICJ Opinion on the Kosovo declaration of independence.
    • [2] Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the conservation of wild birds, OJ L 20, 26.1.2010, p. 7.
    • [3] Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7.
    • [4] Bern Convention: https://www.coe.int/en/web/bern-convention
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Reducing regulatory burden for the fisheries sector – E-001034/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is dedicated to strengthening EU competitiveness and growth while upholding high standards and achieving economic, social, and environmental goals.

    For this, it aims to streamline rules and reduce the administrative burdens for businesses by 25%, and by 35% for small and medium-sized enterprises by the end of this mandate.

    The Commission will continue to systematically evaluate EU legislation, including opportunities to simplify and reduce administrative burden, without undermining its policy objectives.

    Dialogue with stakeholders is key. As indicated in their mission letters and the 2025 Communication on implementation and simplification[1], each Commissioner will host at least two Implementation Dialogues a year.

    Regular exchanges between the Commission and the advisory councils[2] also provide an opportunity to jointly explore ways to simplify EU legislation and reduce administrative burden that stems from it.

    The Nature Restoration Regulation[3] (NRR) does not impose direct obligations on companies or stakeholders. It leaves wide flexibility to national authorities to identify in their national restoration plans[4] the measures needed to achieve the different restoration objectives . The implementation of the NRR is still at an initial stage.

    It would be premature to draw conclusions regarding its impact on stakeholders. The Fisheries Control Regulation was revised only recently, and the focus should now be on its implementation.

    On the basis of the empowerments granted by the co-legislators in the revised Fisheries Control Regulation, the Commission is currently preparing the relevant delegated and implementing acts. Simplification and limiting red tape are guiding principles in this process.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52025DC0047
    • [2] https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/fisheries/scientific-input/advisory-councils_en
    • [3] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1991/oj/eng
    • [4] The national planning efforts will be supported by a digital tool, currently being development by the European Environment Agency, that will reduce administrative burden for Member States to the strictly necessary, notably by reusing existing information (‘report once’ approach) and allowing for a bottom-up approach, where feasible.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Lack of parliamentary oversight over the EU agri-food chain Observatory – E-001039/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU agri-food chain observatory (AFCO) was launched in 2024 as one of the actions that aim to strengthen the position of farmers in the food supply chain and reinforce trust between actors.

    As set out in its Terms of Reference[1], the purpose of AFCO is to advise the Commission and to exchange information and discuss, based on available evidence and facts, with a view to establishing a common diagnosis of the situation across markets, and bring increased transparency on prices, cost structure, margin distribution and added value in the supply chain, while respecting confidentiality and competition rules.

    Expert groups, such as AFCO, provide advice and expertise and do not engage in policy discussions. In line with its Terms of Reference, any recommendation of the group would only represent an input to policy making, providing facts and data to inform policy responses by the Commission and other policy-makers. Such analysis can support legislative proposals and discussions by the co-legislators.

    Members of AFCO are Member States’ authorities and organisations representing stakeholders operating in two or more EU Member States, and active in at least one stage of the food supply chain.

    Stakeholder organisations were selected by the Commission through a public call for applications in line with rules for the creation and operation of Commission expert groups[2].

    The objective was to gather experts from all along the food supply chain. The European Parliament’s Secretariat of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development has an observer status to the group and regularly participates in its meetings.

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/expert-groups/consult?lang=en&groupID=3949
    • [2] C(2016) 3301 final.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Tourism development – E-001026/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Tourism is indeed contributing approximately 10% of GVA (Gross value added) to the EU, employing over 20 million people.

    The Commission has been working together with tourism stakeholders in supporting resilient, sustainable and digitally-fit European tourism along the priorities and actions agreed together under the Transition Pathway for Tourism and European Agenda for Tourism 2030.

    Transnational projects are supported by several EU programmes, such as Interreg, LIFE, Single Market Programme. For example, the Eurovelo project supported by the LIFE programme and managed by the European Cyclists’ Federation (ECF), is developing a network of 17 long distance cycle routes that cross and connect the whole of Europe.

    The 2021-2027 Interreg programmes have allocated almost EUR 2 billion from cohesion policy funds to finance projects under the specific objective tourism and cultural heritage, a key area for cooperation and regional development.

    There is a strong link between tourism and other EU priorities, such as enhanced research and innovation, environmental protection, and competitiveness.

    For example, INTERSMART is a transnational cooperation project co-financed under the Interreg Black Sea Basin programme where partners are working together to create a transnational Network for Interdisciplinary Solutions for Smart Sustainable Tourism and Services in the Black Sea Basin.

    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Possible measures to control illegal immigration at European borders – E-000619/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The management of the EU external borders is an important EU priority and a shared responsibility between all Member States and the EU.

    The Commission supports external border management through policy, funding and operational support. This support includes the multiannual strategic policy for European integrated border management by the European Border and Coast Guard[1], strengthened Frontex operations, and deploying digitalised systems such as the future Entry Exit System[2] and the European Travel Information and Authorisation System[3][4]. These efforts are backed by EUR 6.3 billion in funding[5].

    The Commission also enhances cooperation with third countries and implements mechanisms to address irregular migration, human smuggling and security risks.

    Finally, the management of EU external borders is linked to the Pact on Migration and Asylum, particularly through the Screening Regulation[6] and contingency planning.

    The Commission adopted a proposal[7] for new legislation in the area of returns on 11 March 2025 which needs now to be negotiated by the co-legislators.

    The aim of the new regulatory framework is to increase the effectiveness of returns of third-country nationals with no right to stay in the EU.

    The Commission aims to achieve this through simplification, clarity and more efficiency of return processes, including by reinforcing the obligations of returnees to cooperate, and the measures to prevent absconding and unauthorised movements.

    • [1] The national authorities of Member States responsible for border management, including coast guards to the extent that they carry out border control tasks, the national authorities responsible for return and Frontex constitute the European Border and Coast Guard.
    • [2] https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/schengen/smart-borders/entry-exit-system_en
    • [3] https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/schengen-borders-and-visa/smart-borders/european-travel-information-authorisation-system_en
    • [4] https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/schengen/effective-management-external-borders_en
    • [5] https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/funding/borders-and-visa-funds/integrated-border-management-fund-border-management-and-visa-instrument-2021-27_en
    • [6] Regulation (EU) 2024/1356 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 May 2024 introducing the screening of third-country nationals at the external borders and amending Regulations (EC) No 767/2008, (EU) 2017/2226, (EU) 2018/1240 and (EU) 2019/817, PE/20/2024/REV/1, OJ L, 2024/1356, 22.5.2024.
    • [7] Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union, and repealing Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and the Council, Council Directive 2001/40/EC and Council Decision 2004/191/EC — COM/2025/101 final.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Bans on body gripping (Conibear) and foothold traps – E-000897/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 3254/91[1], the use of a leghold trap, defined as a device designed to restrain or capture an animal by means of jaws which close tightly upon one or more of the animal’s limbs, thereby preventing withdrawal of the limb or limbs from the traps, is prohibited in the EU.

    Additionally, Annex VI to Council Directive 92/43/EEC[2] lists the means of capture and killing prohibited under Article 15 of the directive, which include traps which are non-selective according to their principle or their conditions of use.

    If a trap is designed to kill only certain animal species, it can be considered as selective according to its principle of use. However, its conditions of use must ensure selectivity, i.e. it must be set in a manner which does not allow non-target species to be trapped.

    The Commission has sent a letter to the Permanent Representations of the Member States to the EU on 14 April 2025 to remind them of their obligation to implement and enforce these legal requirements.

    The Commission will also encourage Member States to take measures to limit the possibility of purchasing such traps, for example through controls in specialised shops, and to empower forest guards to confiscate and destroy any illegal traps.

    This is without prejudice to any infringement action to be taken by the Commission in case of non-compliance with the regulation and to remedies in national law, including bringing the matter to the competent national authorities and/or before national courts, where appropriate.

    • [1] Council Regulation (EEC) No 3254/91 of 4 November 1991 prohibiting the use of leghold traps in the Community and the introduction into the Community of pelts and manufactured goods of certain wild animal species originating in countries which catch them by means of leghold traps or trapping methods which do not meet international humane trapping standards, OJ L 308, 9.11.1991, p. 1.
    • [2] Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Possible circumvention of Directive 92/43/EEC and state of scientific research on the harmful effects of offshore wind farms, of which the Commission is aware – E-000582/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has received several complaints regarding the allegedly wrong application of EU environmental law regarding offshore wind farms, including those being developed in France.

    Upon examination and for the moment, the Commission has not identified any problem that would justify further investigation. The Commission also notes that complainants in France have sometimes referred such matters to administrative courts to challenge development permits, including environmental authorisations.

    For the reasons outlined above, the Commission has not requested any information from the French authorities about possible environmental damage to wild flora and fauna caused by offshore wind farms in French marine waters.

    The EU is supporting research to further understand and mitigate the environmental impacts of offshore wind farms, notably through its recent Horizon Europe call for proposals for ‘Minimisation of environmental, and optimisation of socioeconomic impacts in the deployment, operation and decommissioning of offshore wind farms’[1].

    It is expected that the findings of this research will further enhance knowledge on the impacts of offshore wind farms on biodiversity and help minimise those, among other environmental impacts.

    • [1] https://projects.research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/en/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe/eu-missions-horizon-europe/restore-our-ocean-and-waters/minimisation-environmental-and-optimisation-socioeconomic-impacts-deployment-operation-and
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Managing the spread of the silver-cheeked toadfish in the Mediterranean – E-000785/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission carried out a risk assessment for t he silver-cheeked toadfish (Lagocephalus sceleratus) under the Invasive Alien Species (IAS) Regulation[1] and proposed its inclusion on the list of IAS of Union concern in 2022. However, the proposal did not obtain the necessary support from the Member States.

    Measures addressing Lagocephalus sceleratus may be covered by the European Maritime, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Fund ( EMFAF)[2], in the framework of sustainable fishing activities, under the conditions set out in the EMFAF Regulation[3], provided that the Member State has set out such action in its Operational Programme.

    For instance, in Greece, under Specific Objective 1.6, EMFAF funds initiatives for ecosystem protection and IAS management. Measures aim to enhance knowledge and address IAS, mitigate their impact on biodiversity and consumer safety. Compensation for affected fishers is supported through impact assessments to ensure proper allocation of financial assistance.

    Action on IAS is a priority of the EU programme for the environment and climate action (LIFE)[4]. LIFE funding for the silver-cheeked toadfish will depend on whether relevant proposals are submitted and selected for funding in a competitive process.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) No 1143/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species, OJ L 317, 4.11.2014, p. 35.
    • [2] https://oceans-and-fisheries.ec.europa.eu/funding/emfaf_en
    • [3] Regulation (EU) 2021/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 establishing the European Maritime, Fisheries and Aquaculture Fund and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1004, OJ L 247, 13.7.2021, p. 1-49.
    • [4] https://cinea.ec.europa.eu/programmes/life_en
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Ecodesign – local space heaters – E-001230/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission has not proposed new requirements for solid fuel local space heaters and has not taken any final position on this matter.

    All ecodesign measures are established in a transparent process with extensive stakeholder participation including the discussion of working documents. The current review started in 2023 with a Consultation Forum meeting.

    Since then, the Commission has engaged with stakeholders to gather information and their opinions. Meetings are still ongoing with relevant associations, manufacturers and certification laboratories.

    The Commission is preparing an impact assessment for possible ecodesign measures for solid fuel local space heaters. This is assessing the technical and economic aspects as well as the environmental ones.

    The ecodesign Directive requires that ecodesign measures do not have a significant negative impact on the affordability or the life cycle cost of the products. Concerns over technical feasibility and cost will therefore be discussed and addressed in future consultations.

    The Commission will also carefully assess any implications for consumers, notably regarding the affordability or the life-cycle cost of such products.

    In addition, as for all ecodesign measures, any requirements will only concern new appliances, not those already installed in citizens’ homes.

    While recognising the value of sustainable biomass as an affordable and secure energy source, Article 7 of Regulation (EU) 2015/1185[1] requires the Commission to review the measures for solid fuel local space heaters, including an assessment of air pollutant emissions.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2015/1185/oj/eng
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Addressing the impact of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism on the wind energy sector – E-000774/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) puts a carbon price on imports that is equivalent to that paid by EU producers under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS).

    The CBAM thereby addresses the risk of carbon leakage, which could undermine the effectiveness of EU’s climate objectives. This makes the CBAM an essential tool for achieving a climate-neutral Union at the latest by 2050, in line with the Paris Agreement.

    As announced in the Steel and Metals Action Plan of 19 March 2025, the Commission will make a broad review of CBAM by the end of the year. As part of this review, it will make a first legislative proposal extending CBAM to certain downstream products for which there is a risk of carbon leakage.

    To mitigate the costs and administrative burden of the green transition as envisaged by the EU Green Deal, the Commission has taken measures to support EU industries.

    For instance, the Clean Industrial Deal, presented on 26 February 2025, highlights the importance of clean tech, which includes the wind energy sector, in driving future competitiveness, industrial transformation, and decarbonisation.

    The Clean Industrial Deal alone will mobilise over EUR 100 billion to support clean manufacturing in the EU.

    Further, the Commission presented on 26 February 2025 a package of CBAM simplifications, which will facilitate compliance with reporting requirements and simplify the authorisation of declarants, the calculation of emissions, and compliance with the financial liability.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – US tariffs on the EU – E-000873/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission regrets the decision of the United States (US) to impose tariffs on EU exports of steel and aluminium on 12 March 2025.

    The Commission sees no justification for these tariffs on EU steel and aluminium exports. The Commission has emphasised to the US its wish to work together on this and that the EU is not the problem — but is part of the solution.

    The Commission’s priority is to avoid disruptions to EU-US trade and to seek negotiated solutions. The EU has stated its clear preference to find negotiated outcomes with the US, which would be balanced and mutually beneficial.

    In light of the decision by the US to delay by 90 days its country-specific ‘reciprocal’ tariffs on EU exports, the EU has decided to put its countermeasures on EUR 21 billion of US exports on hold for the same length of time.

    This gesture of goodwill will give time for negotiations to proceed. If, however, the talks are not satisfactory, the EU countermeasures will come into force on 14 July 2025.

    At the same time, the Commission is taking forward its internal policy agenda to boost European competitiveness.

    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Transposition of the Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the protection status of the wolf – E-001288/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    As stated in Recital 6 of the Commission proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and the Council amending the Habitats Directive[1] as regards the protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus)[2], pursuant to Article 193 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Member States are allowed to maintain or introduce more stringent measures to protect the environment than those already in place, as long as they are compatible with the Treaties and are notified to the Commission.

    In case Member States intend to maintain a higher protection level of the wolf at national level, this should be signaled at the time of the notification of their transposition measures to the Commission, within 18 months from publication of the amending directive in the Official Journal of the European Union. This does not require adopting any specific new legal instrument.

    • [1] Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7-50.
    • [2] Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 92/43/EEC as regards the protection status of the wolf (Canis lupus), COM/2025/106 final.
    Last updated: 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Measures to prevent deaths at work in Sicily and Italy – P-001378/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission takes the risk of work accidents very seriously. The EU legislation on occupational safety and health (OSH), including Directive 89/391/EEC[1], ensures protection of workers against all risks at work.

    EU OSH Directives lay down minimum requirements and Member States may adopt more stringent protective measures. It is primarily for the national authorities to investigate accidents and enforce national measures transposing EU Directives.

    The Commission analyses and publishes data on work accidents reported by Member States in the framework of the European Statistics on Accidents at Work[2].

    This is currently done at national level. The European Social Fund Plus[3] promotes health and safety at work via its different programmes.

    The one for Sicily[4] plans to invest more than EUR 3.7 million (EU share) on measures for a healthy and well-adapted working environment addressing health risks.

    The Commission and EU OSH stakeholders pursue, in line with the EU Strategic Framework for Health and Safety at Work 2021 — 2027, actions to prevent work-related accidents and illness in line with a Vision Zero approach to work-related deaths.

    For example, the EU regularly adopts new legislative measures and guidelines to prevent the exposure of workers to hazardous chemicals, such as asbestos and other carcinogens, at work.

    In addition, the Commission has published several guidelines such as on protecting the health and safety of workers in agriculture[5], which include information on work safety in transport and in construction[6].

    Finally, the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work published several Online interactive Risk Assessment Tools (OiRA) for different economic sectors including agriculture and construction.

    • [1]  OJ L 183, 29.6.1989, p. 1 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A31989L0391
    • [2] See e.g. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Accidents_at_work_statistics
    • [3] Regulation (EU) 2021/1057 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021.
    • [4] https://fse.regione.sicilia.it/
    • [5] See https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/OSH_workers_agriculture_livestock_farming.pdf
    • [6] See https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/96b5fe83-ef7d-4628-9af0-e02b25810c1d

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – BUDG-CONT-ECON – Presentation of Court of Auditors’ report on EFSI – 13.05 – NEW – Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    ECA Special report 07/2025 © Image used under license from Adobe Stock

    On 13 May from 15:00 to 16:30, the BUDG, CONT and ECON committees have invited Mr Lefteris Christoforou, the European Court of Auditors’ Member who led the audit team of its Special report 07/2025 on “The European Fund for Strategic Investments”.

    Launched in 2015 by the European Commission and the European Investment Bank (EIB), the European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI) aimed at tackling the investment shortfall within the EU after the financial crisis, by mobilising an additional €500 billion in investments by 2022 through various debt and equity instruments. The initiative was supported by a €26 billion EU budgetary guarantee and €7.5 billion in EIB resources. According to ECA’ special report the programme made significant strides in addressing the investment gap. However, it fell short of its target, with an estimated overstatement of the reported amount of €503 billion by €131 billion (26%). This presentation will provide an opportunity for the ECA to share its findings and discuss them with the BUDG, CONT and ECON Members.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Temporary road closure on the C1087 Bealach Na Ba road Saturday 17 May 2025

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    Motorists are being advised by The Highland Council that there will be a temporary road closure on the C1087 Bealach Na Ba Road.

    The closure will be in operation at 10:00 hours on and will remain in effect until 12:30 hours on Saturday 17 May the same day.

    This is to facilitate the holding of the Bealach Na Ba cycle event. The road will be closed to vehicular traffic (with the exception of vehicles used by event organisers) the full length of the C1087 Bealach Na Ba Road from its junction with the A896 Shieldaig-Kishorn-Lochcarron Road westwards to its junction with the C1091 Applecross-Shieldaig (Coast) Road.

    Access will be maintained at all times for emergency vehicles and pedestrian access.

    To avoid the road closure an alternative route will be available via A896 Shieldaig-Kishorn-Lochcarron Road and the C1091 Applecross-Shieldaig (Coast) Road.

    7 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: St Vincent’s Hospital, Kingussie

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    The Highland Council has acquired ownership of the former St Vincent’s Hospital in Kingussie.

    The Council’s immediate priority is to demolish the extension built at the rear of the property.

    This will pave the way for the development of both private and affordable accommodation over the next few years.

    As the Council moves into the design phase, we will be seeking a private partner to collaborate with us in due course.

    This partnership will be crucial in delivering high-quality living spaces for the area.

    7 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Advance notification of improvement works to Grant Street, Inverness

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    The Highland Council is preparing to carry out road improvement works on Grant Street in Inverness that will include the junctions of Lower Kessock Street/PumpgateStreet and Lochalsh Road/Grant Street.  The scope of works will include improvement of the raised road surface and footway works with new kerbs and tactile paving. 

    Design Drawing – Proposed works Grant Street, Lochalsh Road & Pumpgate Street

    The anticipated start date is Monday 9 June 2025 and works are expected to last for approximately 5 weeks. 

    The works to improve the raised road surface on Grant Street will require a section of the road to be closed for 5 days between 7-11 July 2025 inclusive. The area affected is from West of Nelson Street through to Lower Kessock Street.  Diversions will be in place and will be signed. Traffic travelling from Waterloo Bridge will be diverted from Grant Street by Nelson Street and India Street to Lower Kessock Street/Thornbush Road or by Gilbert Street to Lochalsh Road. 

    Outwith the period of road closure, the works will be managed by traffic control to allow access through Grant Street.  Day-to-day traffic management will be carried out by the on-site contractor who will ensure that any disruption associated with the works is kept to a minimum.  

    Diversion Plan – closure of Grant Street 7-11 July 2025. Red and Blue lines show diversionary routes.

    7 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Economics: DG Okonjo-Iweala: Broad agreement on WTO reform as “central priority” for MC14

    Source: WTO

    Headline: DG Okonjo-Iweala: Broad agreement on WTO reform as “central priority” for MC14

    “We are now in the midst of one of the largest disruptions in world trade in history,” the Director-General told members.  “But we are also now less than a year away from MC14, and we must think of what we need to do to maximize our chances for success there, including tackling some of the issues thrown up by this trade crisis.”
    Against this backdrop, DG Okonjo-Iweala said, she has spent the past few weeks engaging with members to discuss what might constitute a credible roadmap to MC14, which will begin on 26 March 2026 in Yaoundé, Cameroon.
    The Director-General said members stressed the importance of MC14 sending a clear political message reaffirming the WTO’s relevance and resilience amidst ongoing global uncertainty.  There was also strong support for prioritizing WTO repositioning and reform at MC14, she noted.
    In regard to substance, many members have proposed forward-looking corrective actions to inadequacies in the WTO’s existing rulebook, together with reforms across core functions, including monitoring and transparency, negotiations, and dispute settlement, she said.
    “The present disruption is seen as a vital opportunity to address the system’s weaknesses and reposition the WTO for the future,” the Director-General said.  “We must not waste a crisis.”
    As part of this, workstreams could be established on issues such as dispute settlement reform, how to ensure the current WTO agreements remain dynamic and relevant, and looking at future trade rules so that the WTO remains responsive to evolving needs, the Director-General said. 
    She proposed a phased approach, consisting of a facilitator-led scoping exercise prior to MC14, ministerial guidance at MC14 on actionable steps for moving forward, and post-MC14 implementation within the workstreams, with the view to presenting concrete outcomes for endorsement at the 15th Ministerial Conference or earlier.
    “We must seize this reform opportunity with seriousness and urgency,” the Director-General declared. Members “need to consider not what the organization can do for us, but what we are willing to give up to reform the organization so it can survive and thrive.”
    The Director-General noted other priority areas identified for MC14, including agriculture, the “second wave” of fisheries subsidies negotiations, the e-commerce work programme and moratorium, the incorporation of the Investment Facilitation for Development Agreement and the joint initiative e-commerce agreement into the WTO framework, and development issues.
    On all these issues, a stocktaking of the progress made will take place in July, and by December members “will need to make a clear decision on which negotiating issues are mature enough to be carried forward to MC14, and which are not,” the Director-General said.  “The overarching goal in all this is to enable productive and meaningful ministerial engagement in Yaoundé.”
    Reports from negotiating chairs
    Members received updates from the chairs of the ongoing WTO negotiations on agriculture, fisheries subsidies, trade and development, the establishment of a multilateral system of notification and registration of geographical indications for wines and spirits, trade and environment, and services.
    Reporting in his capacity as Chair of the agriculture negotiations, Ambassador Ali Sarfraz Hussain (Pakistan) noted his consultations with members and the first negotiating group meeting since his appointment as Chair earlier this year.  He said there was “broad recognition” that delivering an outcome on agriculture is “critical for reinforcing the credibility of the WTO” but acknowledged that on substance, “the main positions have not shifted significantly.”
    On the way forward, the Chair said he would first give proponents space to intensify their engagement and then hold targeted meetings with both proponents and non-proponents to explore ways forward. This would be followed by open-ended meetings of the negotiating group, whenever needed, to ensure full transparency and inclusivity.  This could lead to a stocktaking event in late September or early October after which members will collectively assess the progress made and decide on the best path forward, including the nature of any possible outcomes at MC14.
    Reporting in his capacity as the Chair of the fisheries subsidies negotiations, Ambassador Einar Gunnarsson (Iceland) noted that he led a series of bilateral consultations in late March/early April to hear views on the next steps.  In light of this, the Chair said he would organize meetings over the coming weeks to exchange views on the “second wave” negotiations as well as the entry into force and implementation of the Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies, where 14 acceptances are still needed.
    In regard to the former, the Chair said four focused sessions would take place to give members the opportunity to bring a new thinking into the negotiations that could unlock the current stalemate.  Noting that an existing draft text exists which embodies “painstaking negotiation and numerous hard-fought compromises,” the Chair said: “We need not reinvent the wheel … with the right level of engagement and flexibility, meaningful progress remains within reach.”
    Reporting in her capacity as Chair of the negotiations on trade and development, Ambassador Kadra Hassan (Djibouti) noted that work is continuing through the facilitator-led processes in three areas of work: sanitary and phytosanitary measures and technical barriers to trade; technology transfer; and trade-related investment measures.  She also noted the mandate from ministers at MC13 to continue work on the application of special and differential treatment provisions under various WTO agreements.  With MC14 drawing closer, the Chair called for “further flexibility, creativity and pragmatism from all delegations” in order to achieve outcomes.
    Ambassador Alfredo Suescum (Panama), Chair of the negotiations on the multilateral register for wines and spirits, said that no new proposals have been submitted and that members’ underlying positions remain unchanged. Ambassador Eunice M. Tembo Luambia (Zambia), Chair of the negotiations on trade and environment, said that her consultations with members made clear that WTO members “have no appetite to engage in negotiations on this topic at this time.” 
    Ambassador Adamu Mohammed Abdulhamid (Nigeria), Chair of the services negotiations, said he was in the process of consulting with members on the way forward in view of the built-in mandate to improve schedules of commitments, as well as the call by ministers at MC13 to reinvigorate work. 
    General Council Chair report on informal consultations
    The Chair of the General Council, Saqer Abdullah Almoqbel (Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of), reported on his recent informal consultations with members to explore the nexus between the current economic climate and its impact on the multilateral trading system.
    The assessment is clear, the Chair said: “The situation is challenging, but our resolve must be stronger. There is a firm belief that the WTO and the rules-based multilateral trading system it embodies must remain a cornerstone of our collective response to the challenges. Indeed, many members see this as an opportunity for the WTO to reaffirm its relevance and proactively address the current situation.”
    The Chair said he was considering convening an informal information session at the level of heads of delegations. This would start with a factual presentation on the current situation by WTO economists followed by a forward-looking exchange among heads of delegations on steps the WTO could take to address these impacts, particularly for the most vulnerable economies.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Development Asia: Italy Helps Conserve Pakistan’s Melting Water Towers Through Scientific Innovation

    Source: Asia Development Bank

    Pakistan has 13,032 glaciers covering over 13,500 square kilometers—the highest number of dryland glaciers in Asia. These feed the Indus River, which supports Pakistan’s farmland, energy needs, and drinking water. No other major river relies more heavily on glacier melt, and no country depends more on such a river than Pakistan. The stakes are high: glacier loss could undermine food and energy security for millions, especially in downstream areas like Sindh.

    Italy’s role began over a century ago with early scientific expeditions to the Karakoram Mountains. The 1909 journey of Duke of Abruzzi Roberto Lerco and the 1929 expedition by Duke of Spoleto Prince Aimone with geologist Ardito Desio laid scientific groundwork by documenting terrain, glaciers, and local cultures. While these missions had exploration in mind—culminating in the 1954 Italian ascent of K2—their contributions, including detailed maps and glaciological surveys, remain invaluable today.

    In the 1980s, Desio partnered with climber Agostino Da Polenza to establish EvK2CNR, which pioneered high-altitude research across the Himalayas and Karakorum. This led to the 1990 creation of the Pyramid Observatory—a high-altitude scientific laboratory located 16,568 feet above sea level in Nepal’s Khumbu Valley. Hosting nearly 600 scientific missions, it is a hub for studies on mountain ecosystems, glaciers, biodiversity, climate, and protected areas.

    Through EvK2CNR and partnerships with the United Nations Development Programme, Pakistani universities, and research institutions, Italy launched pioneering glacier initiatives—including the country’s most detailed glacier inventory, documenting 13,032 glaciers across 13,546.93 square kilometers. Using UAVs, satellites, remote sensing, and ground surveys, Italian scientists produced geo-tagged inventories and advanced glacier melt modeling—tools essential for predicting future water supplies.

                           An Italian glaciologist collecting snow cover sample over a glacier in the Karakoram. Photo: EvK2CNR.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with ABC News Breakfast

    Source: Australian Attorney General’s Agencies

    James Glenday, Host: On federal politics, Don Farrell joins us now from Parliament House. Don, good morning and welcome back to News Breakfast.

    Trade Minister, Don Farrell: Good morning, James.

    Glenday: On the final sitting day, could you have imagined returning to Canberra knowing that you’d knocked off the Liberal Party’s leader, Peter Dutton, and the leader of The Greens, Adam Bandt as well?

    Minister Farrell: Well, the truth is, James, I don’t think anybody could have predicted that. I was confident, based on the work that we’d done over the previous three years, especially in my space, of trade, that we would be returned and returned with a majority. But even I couldn’t believe the results as they came in on Saturday night. I think the Greens have suffered because so many times in the last Parliament they blocked sensible policies of the Albanese Government. They voted with the Coalition in the Senate to block, for instance, legislation on housing, sensible housing policy, and I think they’ve paid the political price for that.

    Glenday: This outcome must be deeply satisfying for you. Personally, I just wonder, have you ever felt so satisfied after an election win? Where does this rank? Is it the sweetest victory, almost a fairytale for Labor?

    Minister Farrell: Look, it doesn’t, doesn’t get any better than this, James. When you’ve been involved in politics as long as I have, this has to be the sweetest victory of all.

    Glenday: There you go. Now there’s a trade war happening. I’m not sure where you’re going to end up, but if you are reinstalled as Trade Minister, you’ll have a lot on your plate. Do you know where you’ll head?

    Minister Farrell: First of all, look, we’ve got a number of objectives that we will need to prosecute and prosecute very quickly. On election night I got messages from my European colleagues, they’re very keen to re-engage and have another crack at an EU free trade agreement. The EU has 450 million people, and a $17 trillion economy. They’ll be very important if we can get a breakthrough there. The Indians also contacted me. We were very close to a new free trade agreement with them and I think we can move very quickly now to finalise that agreement. And of course, in the next few weeks, our new free trade agreement with the United Arab Emirates, which sends all of our products into the UAE tariff free, will come into force and that will be important. And of course we, we want to continue discussions with the United States. We believe in free and fair trade and that’s the argument we’ll be prosecuting with them.

    Glenday: I think it’ll be closely watched. Do you expect to head to either China or to the States first?

    Minister Farrell: Look, we’ll worry about that after we know who the new Trade Minister is next week.

    Glenday: That’s fair.

    Minister Farrell: But we will move very quickly to ensure that Australia’s interests are protected here. China, of course, is our largest trading partner. We’re concerned about the tariff war between China and the United States. We believe in free and fair trade and we think that those tariffs should be removed on China.

    Glenday: Okay. You are a factional leader of the Labor right. You were once unkindly referred to as a faceless man. Of course you do have a face. And here you are speaking to us. What are you asking the Prime Minister for though? You’ve got a lot of influence as these Ministerial portfolios are carved up.

    Minister Farrell: A face that a mother could love. And they do call me other things too, by the way. That’s not the only thing they call me. Look, I’m not going to give the Prime Minister any advice on what he should do. He’s won a fabulous victory here. He ran a flawless campaign. His strategy throughout the whole of the last term was about getting reelected and continuing the policies that we took to the election. I’m very happy to leave it all to him and to accept whatever he might wish me to do in the new government.

    Glenday: Ok, just before I let you go, I want to get you on an international issue that’s been developing. Has the Albanese government made any contact with India or Pakistan regarding these cross border strikes we’re seeing?

    Minister Farrell: Look, that’s an issue of course, that is in the hands of our very competent and successful Foreign Minister, Penny Wong. But of course we don’t want to see any conflict in our region. We’d like to see an end to the conflict in the Middle East, the conflict in Ukraine, Russia, and we certainly don’t want to see any conflict in our own region.

    Glenday: And Don, just one last one. We saw smoke this morning from the Vatican. You went to the Pope’s funeral. I’m not sure what that was like, but do you have a personal preference of who the next Pope should be or the direction of the Catholic Church? I’m guessing this is outside the bounds of your factional influence.

    Minister Farrell: Well, as a matter of fact, James, I do have a personal favourite in the Conclave at the moment. And that is the Australian – Ukrainian Cardinal, Cardinal Bychok. I was lucky enough to meet with him twice while I was in Rome. He’s a very, very fine man. A very holy man. I’d like to see him as the next pope. My wife, on the other hand, who’s Filipino, she would like to see Cardinal Tagle as the next pope. And we also had the opportunity of meeting him at the Vatican. So, there’s a couple of candidates for you, James.

    Glenday: There you go. Well, we’ll have to wait and see if you’ve backed a winner there, Don Farrell, the Trade Minister. Perhaps the continuing Trade Minister. We’ll wait and see for that as well. Thank you so much for joining News Breakfast this morning.

    Minister Farrell: Thanks, James.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Pre-Budget speech to BusinessNZ

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    Good afternoon everyone. 

    Today my intention is to put this year’s Budget in context. 

    First, I want to speak briefly about our economic recovery here at home, and why I remain confident despite international uncertainty. 

    Then I’m going to make the case for the two big priorities of Budget 2025, fiscal consolidation and economic growth: why they matter and some steps we’re taking to make them happen.

    It’s fair to say Budget 2025 arrives against a challenging international backdrop. 

    Trade tensions overseas have seen growth forecasts revised down across the world, as exporters and consumers come under sustained pressure. 

    The sharp deterioration of financial markets in early April have somewhat recovered in recent days and weeks, but markets remain volatile. 

    Experts offshore are leaning into the uncertainty. 

    The Bank of Canada even chose to publish two separate scenarios in their latest statement, instead of one single set of forecasts.

    I don’t blame them for having a bob each way. 

    For a small, open economy like New Zealand, the international environment clearly matters a lot, but I remain confident about our recovery. 

    Inflation remains anchored below 3 per cent, and interest rates continue to fall, supporting households with the cost of living and providing the foundation for a domestic economic recovery. 

    The Official Cash Rate has fallen considerably, from 5.5 to 3.5 per cent, with economists picking further cuts are on the way soon. 

    I acknowledge for households, interest rate relief will be a slow and steady process.  

    For example, according to the Reserve Bank, average interest rates on outstanding mortgages have only now fallen for just 4 months in a row, having previously risen for 37 months in a row. 

    The good news is that financial relief for households will keep rolling, with around $60 billion of mortgages set to roll-over in just the next three months. 

    In short, the trend is our friend, even if I know many families and businesses won’t be feeling that relief quite yet. 

    At the same time, an export-led recovery is now well underway in regional New Zealand. 

    Dairy prices are strong, despite global headwinds, supporting farmers to pay down debt and put more money back into rural communities. 

    Fruit exports are booming, hitting $5 billion in value in the 12 months to March, driven by a big jump in kiwifruit sales. 

    The tourism industry is also growing rapidly, with visitor numbers continuing to recover, now hitting 86 per cent of pre-COVID levels. 

    Total tourism expenditure was up 23 per cent in 2024.

    It’s not surprising then that the recovery is looking brighter in regional New Zealand, and the South Island in particular.     

    Just last week Westpac highlighted that in Otago, Canterbury, and Southland, consumer confidence and growth in retail activity is outpacing the rest of the country. 

    Our government is working hard to support that rural recovery. 

    A steady diet of pro-growth deregulation, a strong focus on RMA reform, and fresh efforts to break into new markets offshore are highlights of that agenda so far. 

    We know the difference quality trade agreements can make to our growth prospects. For example, in the 12 months since the EU FTA came into force, exports to the European Union grew by 25 per cent.

    For exporters, that’s worth an additional $1 billion. 

    Whether it’s CER, the CPTPP, the China, UK, or more recent UAE and GCC FTAs, our farmers and exporters are blessed by a latticework of trade agreements, negotiated successively by Ministers and diplomats over many years.

    Clearly India will be an important next step, and it was positive to see Minister of Trade Todd McClay announce on Monday that the first formal round of FTA negotiations kicked off this week. 

    That brings me to this year’s Budget.

    It won’t surprise you to learn that lifting New Zealand’s long run economic performance has been our primary focus in designing Budget 2025. 

    Yes, that has shaped decisions we have made on individual initiatives, some of which I’ll touch on shortly. 

    But our fiscal strategy, including our desire to return to surplus, and the wider impact on inflation, interest rates, and growth has also been front of mind. 

    You might have seen Nicola Willis announce last week that this year’s operating allowance would be smaller than previously signalled, at just $1.3 billion. 

    That will be the smallest operating allowance in a decade and ensures Treasury can still forecast a surplus within the next four years. 

    That was the right decision for several reasons. 

    First, it represents a fresh commitment to necessary fiscal consolidation. 

    In recent years, New Zealand has been living beyond its means and that has come at a significant cost. 

    Since 2017, net core Crown debt has risen by around $120 billion.

    Put another way, that’s $60,000 in additional debt for every household in New Zealand. 

    As a proportion of the economy, debt has ballooned from just 21.6 per cent of GDP in 2017, to around 43 per cent of GDP today, higher than it has been at any time since the 1990s. 

    At the same time, the cost of servicing our national debt has more than doubled, from $3.5 billion in 2017, to almost $9 billion today.

    In some areas, spending more is the right thing to do. 

    In health, education, law and order, defence, and transport my government is prioritising significant new investments. 

    Each of those areas are a priority for New Zealanders and they require more funding to deliver the quality services Kiwis expect. 

    But that comes with trade-offs.  

    Spending more on everything, as some commentators have called for, would mean larger deficits, more debt, and ultimately fewer choices in future budgets as the cost of servicing our debt grows even larger and the prospect of returning to surplus evaporates. 

    Managing and responding to critical risks is also more challenging with high levels of public debt. 

    New Zealand was well served in the Global Financial Crisis, following the Christchurch Earthquake, and during COVID because successive Ministers of Finance made difficult choices to ensure New Zealand had low levels of public debt. 

    Our responsibility is to do what we can to leave a similar inheritance for future administrations. 

    Second, a smaller allowance supports lower interest rates and stronger business activity. 

    Sadly, recent experiences have forced us to re-learn the fundamentals of economics, including the reality that if governments borrow and spend too much, interest rates are forced higher to compensate, putting pressure on family budgets and private sector activity. 

    The good news is that the converse is also true. 

    More restrained fiscal policy supports interest rates to remain low, enabling businesses to grow and families to get ahead under their own steam. 

    ANZ’s initial estimate last week was that the smaller operating allowance would support interest rates being 5-10 basis points lower than otherwise. 

    Meanwhile, Treasury has estimated that with a tighter budget package, interest rates would be up to 30 basis points lower by the end of the forecast period. 

    For a family with a mortgage, or a farmer or entrepreneur taking on debt to grow their business, that means real financial relief and more opportunity to get ahead. 

    Careful spending, low interest rates, and robust private sector growth sits at the very heart of our government’s economic strategy, as we create jobs, boost exports, lift incomes, and promote innovation and investment.

    Prudent fiscal management also supports our economic reputation offshore. 

    For a small-open economy like New Zealand that’s critical. 

    It means we can borrow more affordably when we have to, and guarantees that even in periods of global turmoil, we are a trusted destination for trade and investment. 

    Third, the smaller operating allowance was the right call because keeping our word matters.  

    Nicola Willis has been consistent in her commitment to deliver a path back to surplus and to maintain debt at prudent levels. 

    Conditions can and do change, but it is a credit to her that Budget 2025 demonstrates a return to surplus, despite a challenging global backdrop.  

    That’s the result you expect when you anchor Budget decisions in your fiscal strategy, instead of allowing the pressures of the day to drag you off course. 

    I know there are some commentators calling for larger allowances and more spending. 

    They need to be honest that those decisions will mean more debt, more deficits, and an indefinite delay to New Zealand’s return to surplus. 

    More debt and more deficits is a fiscal strategy – but for a small, internationally-exposed country like New Zealand, it’s also an incredibly risky one. 

    At the same time, just as grey clouds bring silver linings, even tight Budgets present opportunities. 

    In Budget 2025, we will be taking further steps in our long-term mission to lift economic growth and boost productivity.  

    Earlier this year, we published our Government’s Going for Growth Agenda, which outlines a range of actions we are taking to get the New Zealand economy moving and realising its vast potential.

    Each of those actions fits into one of five pillars we have identified as critical to lifting economic growth and improving New Zealanders’ standard of living:

    Developing talent,
    Encouraging innovation, science, and technology,
    Introducing competitive business settings,
    Promoting global trade and investment,
    And delivering infrastructure for growth.

    Each of those pillars will have strong representation in Budget 2025. 

    Today I want to touch on just a few of them – and some small steps we are taking to underpin our growth mission. 

    Encouraging science, innovation, and technology is one of those key pillars. 

    In January at my State of the Nation, I spoke briefly about our vision for the sector. 

    I want to see a much sharper focus on commercialisation, stronger ties to the business community, and rapid access to ideas and innovation from overseas. 

    Capital investment will be critical to our growth journey, but New Zealand won’t achieve a step-change in our living standards if we invest more but continue to lag behind the global technological frontier. 

    In Budget 2025, we will be allocating the funding we need to give effect to the changes I announced earlier this year, including the establishment of three new Public Research Organisations. 

    I also know that following a review of the Research and Development Tax Incentive that kicked off last year, the business community has been looking for some certainty on the future of the programme.

    That review was required in law, and the final report has not yet been tabled in Parliament. 

    However, I can confirm today that we are retaining the RDTI in this year’s Budget so businesses have the certainty they need to keep investing and keep going for growth.

    Promoting global trade and investment has also been a focus of my government in 2025, even before the recent bout of uncertainty offshore. 

    As I said earlier, part of that task has been to bring fresh energy to New Zealand’s proud history of achieving trade agreements offshore, with Minister of Trade Todd McClay finalising two new trade agreements in the Middle East, while we continue to work hard towards a trade agreement with India. 

    But promoting New Zealand as an attractive destination for investment, and a shelter from the global storm, has also been a personal focus of mine. 

    In March, the government hosted an Investment Summit here in Auckland, with attendees representing an estimated $6 trillion in capital, as we showcased opportunities to partner with the Crown, Iwi, and the private sector.

    We are seeing some real progress, including an outstanding deal worth around $1 billion signed by Waikato Tainui and Brookfield Asset Management to further develop the Ruakura Inland Port.

    But of course, I want to see more. 

    Yes, that means getting the structural settings right, including rewriting the Overseas Investment Act, so major investments from offshore are consented faster and more reliably. 

    But for small countries – who have to compete hard for share of mind and share of wallet – we also need a team of national champions constantly making the case for New Zealand as an outstanding place to do business. 

    In January, I announced that team would be led by Invest NZ, an entity specifically responsible for attracting investment to New Zealand, and providing the critical concierge services that have allowed other countries like Ireland and Singapore to punch above their weight. 

    I can confirm today that funding will be allocated for Invest NZ in Budget 2025, ensuring they can crack on and get the job done. 

    Modern, reliable infrastructure – and my government’s efforts to deliver more of it to communities right across the country – will also play a major role in our Going for Growth plan.

    It’s why capital expenditure, including for frontline services like health and education, will be a priority in Budget 2025. 

    As I acknowledged earlier, the operating allowance in this year’s Budget will be a little smaller than previously signalled. 

    However, total capital expenditure allocated in the Budget is a little higher than forecast at $6.8 billion – split across health, education, defence, transport, and other portfolios. 

    When that is offset by savings identified in this year’s budget, it means the net capital allowance is $4 billion, compared to $3.6 billion previously signalled in the Budget Policy Statement. 

    For businesses, that investment represents an opportunity to develop critical skills and capability, promoting growth for many years to come. 

    For Kiwis, it will mean another big investment in the quality frontline services, like health and education, they deserve. 

    The two remaining pillars, our efforts to develop talent and to promote competitive business settings, will also feature prominently in the Budget, but I won’t be making be making announcements in those areas today.

    However, as Nicola Willis confirmed last week and I can confirm again today, there will be a small number of measures in this year’s Budget designed to make it easier for businesses to invest, whether they are based here or offshore.

    If we really want to create high-paying jobs, lift incomes, and make New Zealand a hub for innovation and investment, we need to make our business environment much more attractive. 

    I’m optimistic that Budget 2025 will take some positive steps in that direction. 

    The Minister of Finance was right last week to say Budget 2025 won’t be a lolly scramble.

    It’s not that we can’t afford it, although frankly we can’t. 

    It’s not that it wouldn’t feel good, because it might, for a little while. 

    No, it’s that we have a responsibility to stay disciplined and keep our eyes on the prize. 

    So far, we’re making real progress.

    Inflation is down, interest rates are falling, exports are rising, and the economy is growing. 

    For many New Zealanders, the prospect of a growing economy and rising incomes means a real shot at getting on top of the cost of living. 

    Now is not the time to put that risk. 

    In Budget 2025 that means staying focused, getting back to surplus, and maintaining a relentless focus on economic growth. 

    But for Kiwis, it’s about more than just the dollars and cents. 

    Lower inflation means less stress and less heartbreak, as prices stop skyrocketing and families finally stop falling behind. 

    Lower interest rates means a house becomes a home, not a source of pain and frustration as mortgage repayments crush weekly budgets. 

    And more economic growth means thriving local businesses, higher wages, more jobs, and ultimately more money in your back pocket.

    It means a chance to get ahead and beat the cost of living.  

    And it means we can have confidence that our best days lie ahead.

    New Zealand is the best country on Planet Earth.

    With the right choices, I think we can make it even better. 

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI China: Xi says China, Russia find right path of state-to-state interactions between neighboring major countries

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Xi says China, Russia find right path of state-to-state interactions between neighboring major countries

    Chinese President Xi Jinping inspects the guard of honor during a grand welcome ceremony at the Vnukovo Airport in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War at the invitation of Russian President Vladimir Putin. [Photo/Xinhua]

    MOSCOW, May 7 — Chinese President Xi Jinping said here Wednesday that China and Russia have found a right path of state-to-state interactions between neighboring major countries.

    He made the remarks in a written statement upon his arrival in Moscow for a state visit to the country and attendance at the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War.

    Xi noted that the two sides, as good neighbors that cannot be moved away, true friends who share weal and woe, and good partners of mutual achievement, have forged a spirit of strategic coordination for a new era, which features permanent good-neighborly friendship, comprehensive strategic coordination and mutually beneficial cooperation.

    The independent, mature and resilient bilateral relationship, Xi said, not only brings great benefits to the two peoples, but also makes important contributions to maintaining global strategic stability and promoting an equal and orderly multipolar world.

    This year marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War and the 80th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations, he noted.

    China and Russia, both major countries of the world and permanent members of the UN Security Council, will join hands to safeguard the victorious outcome of World War II, firmly safeguard the UN-centered international system and the international order underpinned by international law, resolutely oppose hegemonism and power politics, practice true multilateralism, and promote the building of a more just and equitable global governance system, Xi said.

    The Chinese president also said that during the visit he will have in-depth communication with Russian President Vladimir Putin on bilateral relations, practical cooperation as well as major international and regional issues of common concern, which will inject strong impetus into the development of the China-Russia comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for a new era.

    Noting that he will attend Russia’s May 9th Victory Day celebrations again after a decade, Xi said he looks forward to working with leaders of other countries and the Russian people to deeply commemorate the martyrs who heroically sacrificed their lives for the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War, and send out a strong voice of the times to safeguard international fairness and justice.

    Xi’s plane was escorted by Russian Air Force aircraft after it entered the country’s airspace.

    When Xi arrived at the Vnukovo Airport in Moscow, he was warmly welcomed by Russian Deputy Prime Minister Tatyana Golikova and other senior government officials.

    Chinese President Xi Jinping is warmly welcomed by Russian Deputy Prime Minister Tatyana Golikova and other senior government officials at the Vnukovo Airport in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War at the invitation of Russian President Vladimir Putin. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Members of an honor guard line up at the airport in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Members of a military band are pictured at the airport in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Members of an honor guard are pictured at the airport in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]
    Chinese President Xi Jinping arrives in Moscow, Russia, May 7, 2025. Xi arrived here on Wednesday to pay a state visit to Russia and attend the celebrations marking the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War. [Photo/Xinhua]

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Xi extends congratulations to China-Russia cultural exchange event

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 7 — Chinese President Xi Jinping extended here Wednesday congratulations to a China-Russia people-to-people and cultural exchange event commemorating the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the Soviet Union’s Great Patriotic War.

    In his message, Xi pointed out that 80 years ago, the Chinese people and the Russian people jointly made indelible historical contributions to the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War and forged an unbreakable great friendship with blood, laying a solid foundation for the high-level development of bilateral relations.

    Xi said that 80 years later, with joint efforts of both sides, China-Russia relations have demonstrated renewed vitality and forged a new model of major-country relations.

    He emphasized that strengthening people-to-people and cultural exchanges is of great and far-reaching significance for enhancing mutual understanding, promoting good-neighborliness and friendship, and consolidating the social and popular support for the development of bilateral ties.

    The Chinese president said that he hopes media outlets of both countries will join hands to forge ahead with a shared mission and carry out warm and down-to-earth people-to-people and cultural exchanges that connect people’s hearts, so as to inject new momentum into mutual understanding and amity between the two peoples, refresh the development of the China-Russia comprehensive strategic partnership of coordination for a new era, and make new contributions to the building of a community with a shared future for mankind.

    The event was co-hosted by China Media Group and All-Russia State Television and Radio Broadcasting Company.

    On the same day, Russian President Vladimir Putin also sent a congratulatory message to the event.

    MIL OSI China News