NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Georgian Prime Minister I. Kobakhidze Elected Chairman of the Georgian Dream Party

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Tbilisi, May 7 (Xinhua) — The Georgian Dream party, Georgia’s ruling party, will be led by Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze.

    The congress of the Georgian Dream, which took place on Wednesday, unanimously elected I. Kobakhidze as the party chairman. I. Kobakhidze took this post for the second time.

    The congress also presented the updated composition of the party’s political council.

    The position of the chairman of the Georgian Dream party became vacant after its former chairman Irakli Garibashvili decided to leave the party and politics. I. Garibashvili made the corresponding statement on April 25. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: The Central Bank of Georgia kept the monetary policy rate at 8 percent.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Tbilisi, May 7 /Xinhua/ — The Monetary Policy Committee of the National Bank of Georgia (NBG, Central Bank) decided at a meeting on Wednesday to once again keep the monetary policy rate (refinancing rate) unchanged at 8 percent, the Central Bank reported.

    The NBG noted that inflation in Georgia remains below the target of 3 percent.

    Given the relatively slow normalization of fundamental factors in the economy and continued high economic growth, the baseline scenario has revised the forecast for real GDP growth in 2025 from 5 percent to 6.7 percent. In the long term, growth is expected to stabilize at around 5 percent.

    The NBG announced its intention to use all instruments to ensure price stability so that the overall level of price growth in the medium term remains close to 3%.

    The Central Bank’s statement indicates that further rate changes will depend on risk analysis and updated macroeconomic forecasts based on it. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: China and Russia have found the right way for large neighboring countries to coexist – Xi Jinping

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Moscow, May 7 /Xinhua/ — China and Russia have found the right path for coexistence between large neighboring countries, Chinese President Xi Jinping said in the Russian capital on Wednesday.

    Xi Jinping made the statement in a written speech published upon his arrival in Moscow on a state visit and to attend events marking the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War.

    The Chinese leader noted that China and Russia are inseparable good neighbors, true friends who endure adversity together, and reliable partners who contribute to each other’s success. The two sides have formed the spirit of Chinese-Russian strategic interaction in the new era, which is characterized by eternal good-neighborly friendship, comprehensive strategic interaction and cooperation for mutual benefit and common gain, Xi Jinping stated.

    According to the Chinese President, independent, mature and strong China-Russia relations not only bring great benefits to the peoples of the two countries, but also make an important contribution to maintaining global strategic stability and building an equal and orderly multipolar world.

    This year, the Chinese leader recalled, marks the 80th anniversary of the victory in the World Anti-Fascist War and the 80th anniversary of the founding of the United Nations.

    China and Russia, as important major countries in the world and permanent members of the UN Security Council, will uphold the victory in World War II, firmly safeguard the international system with the UN at its core and the international order based on international law, resolutely oppose hegemonism and power politics, adhere to genuine multilateralism, and promote the building of a more just and reasonable global governance system, Xi Jinping said.

    The Chinese President also announced that during his state visit to Russia, he will hold in-depth communication with Russian President Vladimir Putin on bilateral relations and practical cooperation, as well as on significant international and regional issues of mutual interest. This, he said, will give a powerful impetus to the development of Chinese-Russian relations of comprehensive partnership and strategic interaction in the new era.

    Recalling that a decade later he will again attend the Victory Day celebrations in Russia on May 9, Xi Jinping said that he hopes to honor with deep feeling the memory of the heroes who died in the struggle for victory in the World Anti-Fascist War together with the leaders of many countries and the Russian people, and to act as a powerful voice of the times in defense of international honesty and justice.

    After Xi Jinping’s plane entered Russian airspace, it was escorted by Russian Air Force aircraft.

    Upon arrival of the PRC Chairman at Moscow’s Vnukovo Airport, he was warmly greeted by Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Tatyana Golikova and other high-ranking officials. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Armenian Prime Minister to Attend Victory Parade in Moscow

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Yerevan, May 7 (Xinhua) — Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan will travel to Moscow on May 9 to attend a parade dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Great Patriotic War, the head of the Armenian government said in the country’s parliament on Wednesday.

    N. Pashinyan confirmed that he accepted the invitation from Russian President Vladimir Putin, received during a telephone conversation on March 14. At the same time, he did not rule out the possibility of holding bilateral meetings with leaders of other countries on the sidelines of the festive events.

    During World War II, about 600,000 Armenian soldiers fought in the ranks of the Soviet and Allied armies, almost half of whom were drafted from Armenia. About 200,000 fighters did not return from the battlefield. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Statement by Prime Minister Carney on the formation of a new government in Germany

    Source: Government of Canada – Prime Minister

    Today, the Prime Minister, Mark Carney, issued the following statement on the formation of a new government in Germany:

    “On behalf of the Government of Canada, I congratulate Chancellor Friedrich Merz on his swearing-in and on the formation of a new government in Germany.

    “Canada and Germany are close partners, and we will be building on our reliable trade relationship. Through stronger alliances, shared values, and deepened trade and commercial ties, we will work to build stronger economies to the benefit of Canadians and Germans alike. I look forward to speaking with Chancellor Merz soon and to strengthening our collaboration at the G7.

    “I also thank former Chancellor Scholz for his leadership and wish him well in his future endeavours.”

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Vietnam is poised to become a top 20 economy, so why is Australia taking so long to make trade and investment links?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anne Vo, Senior lecturer in Vietnamese culture and politics, University of Wollongong

    Aritra Deb/Shutterstock

    At a time of widespread global trade instability, Australia should be expanding and diversifying its economic partnerships. Supply chains remain fragile, and protectionist rhetoric is once again gaining traction in major Western economies.

    US President Donald Trump’s America First agenda includes sweeping tariffs on imports, withdrawal from multilateral agreements and pressure to take production in-house.

    At the same time, China, Australia’s largest trading partner, has often used trade for geopolitical leverage. In 2020, Beijing imposed tariffs of more than 200% on Australian wine. This wiped 30% off the sector’s export value.

    So economic diversification is not only desirable but strategically imperative.

    An opportunity

    Fifty years on from the fall of Saigon, Vietnam presents a compelling opportunity for economic and strategic diversification. The reunited country is eager to move beyond its wartime image and assert itself as an emerging economic powerhouse.

    Vietnam’s capital, Ho Chi Min City. The country has shifted from being a place synonymous with war to becoming one of the world’s top economies.
    Nguyen Quang Ngoc Tonkin/Shutterstock

    Since the launch of the Doi Moi reforms in 1986, Vietnam has embraced economic liberalisation and market-oriented policies. The Doi Moi reforms opened the economy to foreign trade, allowed private ownership and restructured state-owned enterprises.

    From a growth rate of just 1.6% in 1980, Vietnam is now set to become one of the world’s top 20 economies by 2050. In 2023 alone, it attracted A$8.5 billion in foreign direct investment, underscoring strong investor confidence.

    The 50th anniversary of reunification on April 30 provided insights into the country’s growth. Celebrations included military parades, 3D virtual reality displays and exhibitions promoting advances in technology.

    Slow to act

    Yet Australia has been slow to act. Despite geographic proximity and shared interests, Australia’s economic footprint in Vietnam remains surprisingly small. In 2023, Australian foreign direct investment totalled just A$3 million. It ranked 22nd, behind countries including Switzerland and Seychelles.

    In trade, the disparity is similarly stark. Vietnam accounts for only 2.33% of Australia’s exports and 1.4% of imports. Two-way trade between the two countries reached $26.3 billion in 2022. At the same time, Vietnam’s trade with the United States, topped A$191.9 billion.

    Some Australian firms are already making inroads. BlueScope Steel, Linfox, and SunRice have invested significantly in manufacturing, logistics and agriculture. And RMIT University has been a key player in transnational education since it opened the first of three campuses in Vietnam in 2000.

    ANZ and Qantas also have a visible presence. However, small and medium-sized enterprises – which comprise more than 98% of Australian businesses – remain largely absent. Many prefer export partnerships or distributor agreements over direct investment.

    Potential obstacles

    Australian companies have long favoured English-speaking or high-income markets. These offer greater institutional and cultural familiarity and regulatory certainty.

    Vietnam’s relationship-based commercial environment poses challenges, especially for firms lacking embedded networks and local knowledge. Concerns around regulatory transparency, intellectual property protection, contract enforcement and corruption – though improving – continue to weigh on corporate decisions.

    Small to medium enterprises, in particular, face extra barriers due to limited institutional support, regulatory understanding, market intelligence and in-country networks.

    Help from government

    The Australian government has taken some steps to catch up. The Enhanced Economic Engagement Strategy, launched in 2021, aims to double two-way investment and elevate both nations to top ten trading partner status.

    It identifies priority sectors such as agriculture, education, clean energy, digital technology and manufacturing. However, the strategy contains no enforceable legal protections, tariff concessions or means of dispute resolution.

    Manufacturing is one of the priority areas recognised in Australia’s Enhanced Economic Engagement Strategy for Vietnam.
    Hien Phung Tu/Shutterstock

    The lack of these matters. Japan, South Korea and the European Union have pursued coordinated economic strategies that include concessional loans, robust legal frameworks and in-market support services. These help their businesses thrive in Vietnam’s complex regulatory environment.

    Similarly, the EU has integrated trade promotion with legal certainty under agreements like the EU Vietnam Free Trade Agreement.

    More needs to be done

    Without comparable tools, Australia’s initiatives risk being more aspirational than actionable.

    Last year’s upgrade in bilateral ties to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, signals growing political will.

    For Australia to realise the potential of its relationship with Vietnam it should back long-term policies. These policies should reduce market entry barriers, incentivise small to medium enterprises and increase joint skills development.

    Investors also need legal and institutional support.

    Australia has strong potential to expand into emerging sectors. These include renewable energy, digital technology, healthcare, vocational education and training, green and smart infrastructure and agritech.

    Vietnam’s push for environmentally sustainable economic growth, digital transformation and workforce training aligns closely with Australian strengths. This creates opportunities for strategic investment and cooperation.

    There is the potential for Australia to build a dynamic partnership with Vietnam central to its long-term economic position in the Indo-Pacific.

    Anne Vo does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Vietnam is poised to become a top 20 economy, so why is Australia taking so long to make trade and investment links? – https://theconversation.com/vietnam-is-poised-to-become-a-top-20-economy-so-why-is-australia-taking-so-long-to-make-trade-and-investment-links-255722

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Australia is set to be a renewables nation. After Labor’s win, there’s no turning back

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Wesley Morgan, Research Associate, Institute for Climate Risk and Response, UNSW Sydney

    bmphotographer/Shutterstock

    An emphatic election victory for the incumbent Labor government means Australia’s rapid shift to renewable energy will continue. As Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen said on Saturday:

    In 2022, the Australian people voted to finally act on climate change. After three years of progress […] in 2025 they said keep going.

    The election result also means the debate about energy policy is now, in broad terms, over. Australia’s energy future is wind and solar, backed by storage.

    Coal and gas will have a fast-declining role to play and nuclear energy will have none at all. Australia is set to be a renewables nation. There is no turning back now.

    Cementing renewables investment

    By continuing to build renewables capacity, the returned Labor government can position Australia on the world stage as a genuine leader on clean energy.

    The Albanese government has set a national target of more than 80% of the main national electricity grid running on renewables by 2030. With such a large majority in parliament, Labor may well be in government at that time.

    Australia already has the world’s highest per-capita solar uptake, with about 300,000 solar systems installed each year. One in three Australian homes now has rooftop solar.

    Labor is complementing this boom with a new home battery discount scheme, which aims to have more than one million batteries installed by 2030. This will help stabilise the grid by reducing demand at peak times.

    But more investment in renewables is needed. The policy certainty of a returned Labor government should help to attract international capital. This is important, because more than 70% of investment in renewables in Australia comes from offshore.

    Securing climate consensus

    Labor’s win also means it can finally bed down a national consensus on climate policy.

    A recent survey on Australian attitudes to climate action suggested community views can shift if people see action is taken by governments and big business.

    This does not mean community opposition to renewable energy will evaporate – especially in regional Australia. The federal government must work with industry players and other levels of government to ensure proper public consultation. The new Net Zero Economy Authority will play an important role in ensuring the regions and their workers benefit from the energy transition.

    For its part, the Coalition needs to do some soul-searching. Australian voters returned a number of climate-friendly independents in key seats. The Coalition also failed to win support from younger Australians, who typically view renewables favourably.

    All this suggests continued opposition to renewables is unlikely to help the Coalition form government anytime soon. What’s more, continuing to promote nuclear power – which some in the Coalition are pushing for – makes little sense in an increasingly renewables-dominated grid.

    Doubling down on international climate cooperation

    Labor’s plans to rapidly expand renewable energy strengthen Australia’s credentials to host the COP31 UN climate talks with Pacific island countries next year.

    Australia’s bid has strong support from other nations. Turkey – the only other nation with its hand up to host – has so far resisted pressure from Australia to withdraw its bid. In support of their own bid, Turkish representatives pointed to uncertainty in Australia ahead of the May election – however that uncertainty has now passed.

    Adelaide will host the talks if Australia’s bid succeeds. This will be a chance to share our world-beating renewables story – including in South Australia, which is set to achieve 100% clean electricity by 2027.

    Australia could also use the talks in South Australia to promote new export industries that use renewable energy, especially plans to produce green iron and green steel at Whyalla.

    Hosting rights could attract investment in Australia’s renewables rollout and help promote exports of critical minerals and green metals. And it would enable Australia to cement its place in the Pacific during a time of increased geo-strategic competition, by promoting a renewables partnership for the whole region.

    Australia must move fast and secure the COP31 bid at climate talks in Germany next month. Any delay risks a less ambitious summit next year, because building consensus for new initiatives takes time.

    South Australia has made a bold bid to host COP31 (SA Government)

    Seizing our economic opportunities

    As Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said during his victory speech on Saturday, renewable energy is “an opportunity we must work together to seize for the future of our economy”.

    Australia is the world’s largest exporter of raw iron ore and metallurgical coal, both used extensively in offshore steelmaking.

    But Australia can create jobs and reduce emissions by refining iron ore in Australia using renewables and green hydrogen.

    The potential export value of green iron is estimated at A$295 billion a year, or three times the current value of iron ore exports. More broadly, our clean energy exports – including green metals, fertilisers and fuels – could be worth six to eight times more than our fossil fuel exports, analysis suggests.

    A key challenge for the returned government is assuring markets such as Japan that Australia is a long-term strategic partner, even while redirecting trade and investment away from coal and gas exports and toward long-term clean energy industries.

    Embracing Australia’s future

    Australians have delivered a strong mandate for climate action. The returned Labor government must ensure this support is not squandered, and voter trust is not lost.

    This means seizing the opportunity, once and for all, to shift Australia from our past as a fossil fuel heavyweight to our future as a renewables superpower.

    Wesley Morgan is a fellow with the Climate Council of Australia

    Ben Newell receives funding from the Australian Research Council

    – ref. Australia is set to be a renewables nation. After Labor’s win, there’s no turning back – https://theconversation.com/australia-is-set-to-be-a-renewables-nation-after-labors-win-theres-no-turning-back-256081

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: expert reaction to study looking at ultra-processed foods and early signs of Parkinson’s disease

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    May 7, 2025

    A study published in Neurology looks at ultra-processed foods (UPFs) and signs of Parkinson’s disease. 

    Dr Katherine Fletcher, Research Lead at Parkinson’s UK, said:

    “Research into diet in general is difficult as people often will inaccurately self-report what their diet comprises. This could be down to forgetting to fill in the diary at the time, to subjective interpretation of amounts of UPFs.

    “The study group also lacked ethnic and socio-economic diversity, which is vital when looking to better understand factors that contribute to the causes of a health condition.

    “In respect of strengths, it was a long-running study with a reasonably large sample size, building on a theory that already exists about the impact of diet.  Nonetheless, a much wider body of research is required before drawing any conclusions i.e. looking globally at different diets.

    “This paper builds on previous research, such as the work of Dr. Laurie Mischley1 at Bastyr University, which has shown an association between processed foods and faster progression of Parkinson’s.  Additionally, evidence suggests that following a Mediterranean-style diet2 – rich in fresh fruits, vegetables, pulses, and olive oil – could reduce someone’s risk of going on to develop Parkinson’s.

    “Research into diet and nutrition is crucial, as there is growing evidence that, for some individuals, Parkinson’s may originate from changes in the gut.  Ongoing studies are exploring alterations in the gut microbiome in Parkinson’s and investigating potential interventions to address these changes and as well as investigating diet and supplements to help manage symptoms.”

     

    1 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29081890/

    Prof Eef Hogervorst, Professor of Psychology, Loughborough University, said:

    “Firstly, the outcome term ‘early symptoms of Parkinson’s disease’ is a bit misleading as symptoms such as constipation, and body pain here found to be associated with consumption of Ultra Processed Foods (UPF) are quite common in ageing and are not necessarily indicative of Parkinson’s disease.

    “Even the most likely predictor of Parkinson’s disease – probably REM sleep disorder – is seen in 65% of Parkinson patients but also in 10% of controls, with low (65%) sensitivity for Parkinson’s disease, even when people already have this disease (Kakazu, 2024: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2024.09.042).  This symptom only shows relations with the highest intake of UPF.

    “Other symptoms like reduced sense of smell, daytime sleepiness, impaired colour vision and depression by themselves seem not related to consumption of UPF.

    “With regards to the UPF outcome, 30% of food consumption assessed by questionnaire was not agreed on and while experts apparently re-assessed these, it is not clear how they agreed on categorisation of foods, so whether they were UPF or not.

    “It seemed strange that non-UPF food included beef, pork, lamb chicken or turkey sandwich (all processed meats); cream; pancakes or waffles; pie, home-baked or readymade; popcorn; potato or

    corn chips; soy milk; and tomato sauce, as well as distilled alcohol and dairy coffee.

    “Individual foods such as UPF breads or cereals and indeed microwaveable meals were by themselves not associated with the ‘early Parkinson disease symptoms’ while sauces, sweets, artificial sweetened drinks and desserts were as well as savoury snacks, animal and dairy products including yogurts.  Such foods are associated with diabetes mellitus and vascular (heart) disease, respectively, which can impact on brain disease because of their sugar and trans fat contents, respectively.

    “However, it is not the first study to show associations of UPF and brain disease.  We early wrote a piece on studies investigating dementia risk and processed meat consumption

    https://theconversation.com/processed-red-meat-isnt-just-bad-for-your-heart-its-also-associated-with-dementia-247619   A healthy varied whole food diet is associated with prevention of many diseases including dementia.

    “Lastly, these two cohorts were mainly white health professionals so the results do not necessarily translate to everyone.

    “So this study may be affected by UPF categorisation as a predictor, where also not all UPF foods showed an association; the limited study group associations were assessed in (only mainly white health professionals and nurses) and also by the outcome, as these symptoms are not necessarily predictive of Parkinson’s disease, nor were these symptoms individually all associated with UPF consumption.”

     

    Dr Daniel J van Wamelen, Clinical Senior Lecturer in Neuroscience and Honorary Consultant Neurologist, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, said:

    “The findings in this study are interesting and appear to be based on solid research with conclusions well supported by the data.  However, it is important to highlight that the symptoms examined in this study are possible early signs of Parkinson’s disease, not definitive indicators that someone will go on to develop it.  The study did not track whether participants were diagnosed with Parkinson’s later on.

    “Many of the individual symptoms noted, such as sleep disturbances, constipation, and mood changes, are common in the general population.  While the study found that people who ate more ultra-processed foods tended to report more of these non-motor symptoms, it did not find a direct increase in the risk of Parkinson’s disease itself.  That said, having more of these symptoms suggests a higher risk over time.  For example, a person experiencing a combination of REM sleep behaviour disorder, constipation, and depressive symptoms has a higher likelihood of developing Parkinson’s down the line, but the risk is not absolute.  To better understand the long-term implications, we would need a longer follow-up to see how many participants go on to develop Parkinson’s and how this is associated with their diet.

    “In short, this is an interesting piece of research addressing important questions.  But the connection to Parkinson’s disease should be viewed with caution until more definitive evidence becomes available.”

     

     

     

    ‘Long-Term Consumption of Ultraprocessed Foods and Prodromal Features of Parkinson Disease’ by Peilu Wang et al. was published in Neurology at 21:00 UK time on Wednesday 7 May 2025. 

    DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213562

     

     

    Declared interests

    Dr Katherine Fletcher: “The author declares that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence their comment reported in this article.”

    Prof Eef Hogervorst: “A previous consultancy for Proctor on omega 3 and folic acid supplement review to protect against dementia (these did not in meta-analyses), and unpaid but a travel reimbursed media appearance (breakfast TV BBC) to discuss the Lancet 2024 risk factors for dementia and her own articles including the Conversation piece on nutrition and dementia risk https://theconversation.com/processed-red-meat-isnt-just-bad-for-your-heart-its-also-associated-with-dementia-247619.  Eef also acted as unpaid but travel reimbursed consultant for NICE on menopausal HRT and dementia risk and has received travel reimbursement to speak at ESG and BMS conference on dementia prevention in 2024/2025.”

    Dr Daniel J van Wamelen: “Supported by research funding from CHDI Inc, MRC, and BRC; received travel grants and speaker fees for educational purposes from Bial Pharma; served on advisory boards for Britannia Pharmaceuticals and Invisio Pharma; received in kind contributions (equipment) from Chrono Eyewear BV for research projects.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Global Net Lease Reports First Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    – Successfully Closed First Phase of Multi-Tenant Portfolio Sale Resulting in $1.1 Billion of Gross Proceeds; On Track to Close Remaining Multi-Tenant Portfolio Sale by End of Q2’25

    – Reduced Net Debt by $833 Million in Q1’25; Improved Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA to 6.7x

    – Repurchased 7.9 Million Shares at a Weighted Average Price of $7.50 Totaling $59 Million as of May 2, 2025

    – Reaffirms 2025 Guidance

    NEW YORK, May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Global Net Lease, Inc. (NYSE: GNL) (“GNL” or the “Company”), an internally managed real estate investment trust that focuses on acquiring and managing a globally diversified portfolio of strategically located commercial real estate properties, announced today its financial and operating results for the quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    First Quarter 2025 Highlights

    • Successfully closed the first phase of the sale of the multi-tenant portfolio, consisting of 59 unencumbered assets, with the net proceeds used to pay down $850 million of the Revolving Credit Facility
    • Remain on track to close the remaining two phases of the multi-tenant portfolio sale, consisting of 41 encumbered assets, by the end of the second quarter 2025, after which GNL expects to begin realizing G&A savings and enhanced portfolio metrics
    • Revenue was $132.4 million in first quarter 2025, compared to $147.9 million in first quarter 2024, primarily as a result of asset dispositions
    • Net loss attributable to common stockholders was $200.3 million, compared to a net loss of $34.7 million in first quarter 2024, primarily caused by the timing and purchase price allocation associated with the partial completion of the multi-tenant portfolio sale
    • Net loss attributable to common stockholders is expected to significantly improve upon completion of the sale of the remaining multi-tenant portfolio
    • Core Funds from Operations (“Core FFO”) was $35.0 million compared to $56.6 million in first quarter 2024, primarily as a result of asset dispositions, including the multi-tenant portfolio sale
    • Adjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”)1 was $66.2 million, or $0.29 per share, compared to $75.0 million in first quarter 2024, or $0.33 per share, primarily as a result of asset dispositions, including the multi-tenant portfolio sale
    • 2025 closed plus disposition pipeline totals $2.1 billion2 at a cash cap rate of 8.3% and a weighted average lease term of 5.2 years; maintains focus on using net proceeds from non-core asset sales to reduce leverage and strengthen the balance sheet
    • Reduced Net Debt by $1.5 billion since first quarter 2024, including $833.2 million in first quarter 2025, improving Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA from 8.4x to 6.7x over the same period
    • As of May 2, 2025, the Company has repurchased 7.9 million shares of its outstanding common stock under its Share Repurchase Program announced in February 2025, at a weighted average price of $7.50, for a total of $59.4 million; this includes 2.4 million shares for a total of $19.4 million repurchased in first quarter 2025
    • Leased over 826,000 square feet across the single-tenant portfolio, resulting in nearly $6.1 million of new straight-line rent
    • Single-tenant renewal leasing spread of 8.2% with a weighted average lease term of 6.6 years; new leases completed in the single-tenant portfolio in the quarter had a weighted average lease term of 5.0 years
    • Weighted average annual rent increase of 1.5% provides organic rental growth, excluding 18.7% of the portfolio with CPI-linked leases that have historically experienced significantly higher rental increases
    • Sector-leading 60% of annualized straight-line rent comes from investment-grade or implied investment-grade tenants3

    “The first quarter of 2025 was a pivotal period in GNL’s transformation as we took important steps to streamline our portfolio, strengthen the balance sheet, and enhance financial flexibility,” said Michael Weil, CEO of GNL. “We believe with lower leverage, greater liquidity, and disciplined execution and capital allocation, GNL is better positioned to operate more efficiently and pursue new opportunities aligned with our strategic vision. These foundational initiatives are not only aimed at improving near-term metrics, but at building lasting resilience and long-term value for shareholders. As we continue executing on our strategy, we believe these efforts will help narrow the trading gap between GNL and our net lease peers. We look forward to completing the final two phases of the multi-tenant portfolio sale in the second quarter and carrying that momentum into the second half of 2025 and beyond.”

    Full Year 2025 Guidance Update4

    • The Company reaffirms its 2025 AFFO per Share guidance range of $0.90 to $0.96 and Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA range of 6.5x to 7.1x.

    Summary of Results

        Three Months Ended March 31,
    (In thousands, except per share data)     2025       2024  
    Revenue from tenants   $ 132,415     $ 147,880  
             
    Net loss attributable to common stockholders   $ (200,315 )   $ (34,687 )
    Net loss per diluted common share   $ (0.87 )   $ (0.15 )
             
    NAREIT defined FFO attributable to common stockholders   $ 32,961     $ 55,773  
    NAREIT defined FFO per diluted common share   $ 0.14     $ 0.24  
             
    Core FFO attributable to common stockholders   $ 34,967     $ 56,592  
    Core FFO per diluted common share   $ 0.15     $ 0.25  
             
    AFFO attributable to common stockholders   $ 66,220     $ 74,964  
    AFFO per diluted common share   $ 0.29     $ 0.33  
                     

    Property Portfolio

    As of March 31, 2025, the Company’s portfolio of 1,045 net lease properties is located in ten countries and territories, and is comprised of 51.3 million rentable square feet. As a result of the agreement to sell 100 of the 101 properties in its former multi-tenant retail segment in connection with the Multi-Tenant Retail Disposition, the Company has determined that as of March 31, 2025, the Company operates in three remaining reportable segments based on property type: (1) Industrial & Distribution, (2) Retail (formerly known as “Single-Tenant Retail”) and (3) Office. The real estate portfolio metrics include (inclusive of the properties to be sold in the remaining two phases of the multi-tenant portfolio sale):

    • 95% leased (98%5 adjusting for vacant properties sold shortly after the first quarter of 2025) with a remaining weighted-average lease term of 6.3 years6
    • 86% of the portfolio contains contractual rent increases based on annualized straight-line rent
    • 60% of portfolio annualized straight-line rent derived from investment grade and implied investment grade rated tenants
    • 76% U.S. and Canada, 24% Europe (based on annualized straight-line rent)
    • 40% Industrial & Distribution, 25% Retail, 22% Office and 13% related to the remaining 41 properties in the Multi-Tenant Retail Portfolio that are expected to be sold in the second quarter of 2025 (based on an annualized straight-line rent)

    Capital Structure and Liquidity Resources7

    As of March 31, 2025, the Company had liquidity of $499.1 million and $1.4 billion of capacity under its revolving credit facility. The Company had net debt of $3.7 billion8, including $2.3 billion of gross mortgage debt. The Company successfully reduced its outstanding net debt balance by $833.2 million from fourth quarter 2024.

    As of March 31, 2025, the percentage of debt that is fixed rate (including variable rate debt fixed with swaps) was 91%. The Company’s total combined debt had a weighted average interest rate of 4.2% (4.4% when including mortgages classified as part of discontinued operations) resulting in an interest coverage ratio of 2.5 times9. Weighted-average debt maturity was 2.7 years as of March 31, 2025.

    Footnotes/Definitions

    1 While we consider AFFO a useful indicator of our performance, we do not consider AFFO as an alternative to net income (loss) or as a measure of liquidity. Furthermore, other REITs may define AFFO differently than we do. Projected AFFO per share data included in this release is for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as indicative of future dividends or as a measure of future liquidity.
    2 Closed plus disposition pipeline of $2.1 billion as of May 1, 2025. Includes $1.9 billion of closed plus pipeline occupied dispositions at a cash cap rate of 8.3% and $201 million of closed plus pipeline vacant dispositions. The properties included in our disposition pipeline for such purposes include those for which we have entered into purchase and sale agreements (“PSAs”) or non-binding letters of intents (“LOIs”). There can be no assurance that the transactions contemplated by such PSAs or LOIs will be completed on the terms contemplated, if at all.
    3 As used herein, “Investment Grade Rating” includes both actual investment grade ratings of the tenant or guarantor, if available, or implied investment grade. Implied Investment Grade may include actual ratings of tenant parent, guarantor parent (regardless of whether or not the parent has guaranteed the tenant’s obligation under the lease) or by using a proprietary Moody’s analytical tool, which generates an implied rating by measuring a company’s probability of default. The term “parent” for these purposes includes any entity, including any governmental entity, owning more than 50% of the voting stock in a tenant or a guarantor. Ratings information is as of March 31, 2025. Comprised of 33.3% leased to tenants with an actual investment grade rating and 26.8% leased to tenants with an Implied Investment Grade rating based on annualized cash rent as of March 31, 2025.
    4 We do not provide guidance on net income. We only provide guidance on AFFO per share and our Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio and do not provide reconciliations of this forward-looking non-GAAP guidance to net income per share or our debt to net income due to the inherent difficulty in quantifying certain items necessary to provide such reconciliations as a result of their unknown effect, timing and potential significance. Examples of such items include impairment of assets, gains and losses from sales of assets, and depreciation and amortization from new acquisitions and other non-recurring expenses.
    5 First quarter 2025 occupancy was temporarily impacted by the vacancy of Contractor’s Steel, a privately-owned and operated full-service steel supplier that occupied nearly 1.4 million square feet. Following their departure and subsequent to the first quarter of 2025, GNL sold all five vacant properties, which helped minimize vacancy downtime. Including the sale of these properties, GNL’s pro-forma first quarter of 2025 occupancy would be 98% compared to the 95% provided in company filings.
    6 Weighted-average remaining lease term in years is based on square feet as of March 31, 2025.
    7 During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company did not sell any shares of Common Stock or Series B Preferred Stock through its Common Stock or Series B Preferred Stock “at-the-market” programs. However, as of May 2, 2025, the Company had repurchased 7.9 million shares of its outstanding common stock under its Share Repurchase Program for a total of $59.4 million, including 2.4 million shares repurchased in the first quarter of 2025 for a net amount of $19.4 million.
    8 Comprised of the principal amount of GNL’s outstanding debt totaling $3.9 billion less cash and cash equivalents totaling $147.0 million, as of March 31, 2025.
    9 The interest coverage ratio is calculated by dividing adjusted EBITDA for the applicable quarter by cash paid for interest (calculated based on the interest expense less non-cash portion of interest expense and amortization of mortgage (discount) premium, net). Management believes that Interest Coverage Ratio is a useful supplemental measure of our ability to service our debt obligations. Adjusted EBITDA and Cash Paid for Interest are Non-GAAP metrics and are reconciled below.

    Conference Call 

    GNL will host a webcast and conference call on May 8, 2025 at 11:00 a.m. ET to discuss its financial and operating results.

    To listen to the live call, please go to GNL’s “Investor Relations” section of the website at least 15 minutes prior to the start of the call to register and download any necessary audio software.

    Dial-in instructions for the conference call and the replay are outlined below.

    Conference Call Details

    Live Call

    Dial-In (Toll Free): 1-877-407-0792
    International Dial-In: 1-201-689-8263

    Conference Replay*

    For those who are not able to listen to the live broadcast, a replay will be available shortly after the call on the GNL website at www.globalnetlease.com

    Or dial in below:

    Domestic Dial-In (Toll Free): 1-844-512-2921

    International Dial-In: 1-412-317-6671

    Conference Number: 13750622

    *Available from 2:00 p.m. ET on May 8, 2025 through August 8, 2025.

    Supplemental Schedules 

    The Company will furnish supplemental information packages with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to provide additional disclosure and financial information. Once posted, the supplemental package can be found under the “Presentations” tab in the Investor Relations section of GNL’s website at www.globalnetlease.com and on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. 

    About Global Net Lease, Inc. 

    Global Net Lease, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust listed on the NYSE, which focuses on acquiring and managing a global portfolio of income producing net lease assets across the United States, United Kingdom, and Western and Northern Europe. Additional information about GNL can be found on its website at www.globalnetlease.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    The statements in this press release that are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause the outcome to be materially different. The words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential,” “predicts,” “plans,” “intends,” “would,” “could,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which are outside of the Company’s control, which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include the risks that any potential future acquisition or disposition (including the proposed closing of the encumbered properties portion of the multi-tenant portfolio) by the Company is subject to market conditions, capital availability and timing considerations and may not be identified or completed on favorable terms, or at all. Some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those presented in the Company’s forward-looking statements are set forth in the “Risk Factors” and “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” sections in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and all of its other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, as such risks, uncertainties and other important factors may be updated from time to time in the Company’s subsequent reports. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time, unless required by law.

    Contacts: 

    Investors and Media:
    Email: investorrelations@globalnetlease.com
    Phone: (332) 265-2020

     
    Global Net Lease, Inc.
    Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
    (In thousands)
        March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
    ASSETS        
    Real estate investments, at cost:        
    Land   $ 755,520     $ 802,317  
    Buildings, fixtures and improvements     3,972,434       4,120,664  
    Construction in progress     2,024       3,364  
    Acquired intangible lease assets     648,368       695,597  
    Total real estate investments, at cost     5,378,346       5,621,942  
    Less accumulated depreciation and amortization     (1,016,159 )     (999,909 )
    Total real estate investments, net     4,362,187       4,622,033  
    Real estate assets held for sale     171,675       17,406  
    Assets related to discontinued operations     670,483       1,816,131  
    Cash and cash equivalents     147,047       159,698  
    Restricted cash     59,144       64,510  
    Derivative assets, at fair value     327       2,471  
    Unbilled straight-line rent     92,757       89,804  
    Operating lease right-of-use asset     67,461       66,163  
    Prepaid expenses and other assets     51,360       51,504  
    Multi-tenant disposition receivable, net     108,729       —  
    Deferred tax assets     4,915       4,866  
    Goodwill     44,842       51,370  
    Deferred financing costs, net     8,407       9,808  
    Total Assets   $ 5,789,334     $ 6,955,764  
             
    LIABILITIES AND EQUITY        
    Mortgage notes payable, net   $ 1,774,116     $ 1,768,608  
    Revolving credit facility     547,406       1,390,292  
    Senior notes, net     911,416       906,101  
    Acquired intangible lease liabilities, net     20,441       24,353  
    Derivative liabilities, at fair value     2,679       3,719  
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses     47,789       52,878  
    Operating lease liability     40,673       40,080  
    Prepaid rent     14,389       13,571  
    Deferred tax liability     5,991       5,477  
    Dividends payable     11,990       11,909  
    Real estate liabilities held for sale     1,377       —  
    Liabilities related to discontinued operations     495,515       551,818  
    Total Liabilities     3,873,782       4,768,806  
    Commitments and contingencies     —       —  
    Stockholders’ Equity:        
    7.25% Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock     68       68  
    6.875% Series B cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock     47       47  
    7.50% Series D cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock     79       79  
    7.375% Series E cumulative redeemable perpetual preferred stock     46       46  
    Common stock     3,617       3,640  
    Additional paid-in capital     4,342,134       4,359,264  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (15,755 )     (25,844 )
    Accumulated deficit     (2,414,684 )     (2,150,342 )
    Total Stockholders’ Equity     1,915,552       2,186,958  
    Total Liabilities and Equity   $ 5,789,334     $ 6,955,764  
                     
    Global Net Lease, Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
    (In thousands, except share and per share data)
        Three Months Ended March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Revenue from tenants   $ 132,415     $ 147,880  
             
    Expenses:        
    Property operating     13,953       17,796  
    Impairment charges     60,315       4,327  
    Merger, transaction and other costs     1,579       753  
    General and administrative     16,203       14,663  
    Equity-based compensation     3,093       1,973  
    Depreciation and amortization     56,334       57,172  
    Goodwill impairment     7,134       —  
    Total expenses     158,611       96,684  
    Operating (loss) income before gain on dispositions of real estate investments     (26,196 )     51,196  
    (Loss) gain on dispositions of real estate investments     (1,678 )     5,868  
    Operating (loss) income     (27,874 )     57,064  
    Other income (expense):        
    Interest expense     (53,437 )     (64,593 )
    Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt     (418 )     (58 )
    (Loss) gain on derivative instruments     (3,856 )     1,588  
    Unrealized (losses) gains on undesignated foreign currency advances and other hedge ineffectiveness     (6,351 )     1,032  
    Other income (expense)     48       (40 )
    Total other expense, net     (64,014 )     (62,071 )
    Net loss before income taxes     (91,888 )     (5,007 )
    Income tax provision     (3,280 )     (2,358 )
    Loss from continuing operations     (95,168 )     (7,365 )
    Loss from discontinued operations     (94,211 )     (16,386 )
    Net loss     (189,379 )     (23,751 )
    Preferred stock dividends     (10,936 )     (10,936 )
    Net loss attributable to common stockholders   $ (200,315 )   $ (34,687 )
             
    Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share:        
    Net loss per share from continuing operations   $ (0.46 )   $ (0.08 )
    Net loss per share from discontinued operations     (0.41 )     (0.07 )
    Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders — Basic and Diluted[1]   $ (0.87 )   $ (0.15 )
             
    Weighted average shares outstanding — Basic and Diluted     230,264       230,320  
                     
                     
    Global Net Lease, Inc.
    Quarterly Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures (Unaudited)
    (In thousands)
        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Adjusted EBITDA        
    Net loss   $ (189,379 )   $ (23,751 )
    Depreciation and amortization     56,334       57,172  
    Interest expense     53,437       64,593  
    Income tax expense     3,280       2,358  
    Discontinued operations adjustments     47,219       53,018  
    EBITDA     (29,109 )     153,390  
    Impairment charges     60,315       4,327  
    Equity-based compensation     3,093       1,973  
    Merger, transaction and other costs     1,579       753  
    Loss (gain) on dispositions of real estate investments     1,678       (5,867 )
    Loss (gain) on derivative instruments     3,856       (1,588 )
    Unrealized losses (gains) on undesignated foreign currency advances and other hedge ineffectiveness     6,351       (1,032 )
    Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt     418       58  
    Other (income) expense      (48 )     40  
    Expenses attributable to European tax restructuring[1]     —       469  
    Transition costs related to the REIT Merger and Internalization[2]     —       2,826  
    Goodwill impairment[3]     7,134       —  
    Discontinued operations adjustments     83,149       (16 )
    Adjusted EBITDA     138,416       155,333  
    Net operating income (NOI)        
    General and administrative     16,203       14,663  
    Expenses attributable to European tax restructuring[1]     —       (469 )
    Transition costs related to the Merger and Internalization[2]     —       (2,826 )
    Discontinued operations adjustments     1,255       1,514  
    NOI     155,874       168,215  
    Amortization related to above- and below- market lease intangibles and right-of-use assets, net     160       2,225  
    Straight-line rent     (5,235 )     (4,562 )
    Cash NOI   $ 150,799     $ 165,878  
             
    Cash Paid for Interest:        
    Interest Expense – continuing operations   $ 53,437     $ 64,593  
    Interest Expense – discontinued operations     17,457       18,160  
    Non-cash portion of interest expense     (2,486 )     (2,394 )
    Amortization of discounts on mortgages and senior notes     (13,960 )     (15,338 )
    Total cash paid for interest   $ 54,448     $ 65,021  
                     
    _____________
    [1] Amounts relate to costs incurred related to the tax restructuring of our European entities. We do not consider these expenses to be part of our normal operating performance and have, accordingly, increased Adjusted EBITDA for these amounts.
    [2] Amounts include costs related to (i) compensation incurred for our former Co-Chief Executive Officer who retired effective March 31, 2024; (ii) a transition service agreement with our former advisor and; (iii) insurance premiums related to expiring directors and officers insurance of former RTL directors. We do not consider these expenses to be part of our normal operating performance and have, accordingly, increased Adjusted EBITDA for these amounts.
    [3] This is a non-cash item and is added back as it is not considered indicative of operating performance.
                     
    Global Net Lease, Inc.
    Quarterly Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Measures (Unaudited)
    (In thousands)
        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Net loss attributable to stockholders (in accordance with GAAP)   $ (200,315 )   $ (34,687 )
    Impairment charges     60,315       4,327  
    Depreciation and amortization     56,334       57,172  
    Loss (gain) on dispositions of real estate investments     1,678       (5,867 )
    Discontinued operations FFO adjustments     114,949       34,828  
    FFO (defined by NAREIT)     32,961       55,773  
    Merger, transaction and other costs     1,579       753  
    Loss on extinguishment and modification of debt     418       58  
    Discontinued operations Core FFO adjustments     9       8  
    Core FFO attributable to common stockholders     34,967       56,592  
    Non-cash equity-based compensation     3,093       1,973  
    Non-cash portion of interest expense     2,486       2,394  
    Amortization related to above- and below-market lease intangibles and right-of-use assets, net     160       2,225  
    Straight-line rent     (5,235 )     (4,562 )
    Unrealized losses (gains) on undesignated foreign currency advances and other hedge ineffectiveness     6,351       (1,032 )
    Eliminate unrealized losses (gains) on foreign currency transactions[1]     3,304       (1,259 )
    Amortization of discounts on mortgages and senior notes     13,960       15,338  
    Expenses attributable to European tax restructuring[2]     —       469  
    Transition costs related to the REIT Merger and Internalization[3]     —       2,826  
    Goodwill impairment[4]     7,134       —  
    Adjusted funds from operations (AFFO) attributable to common stockholders   $ 66,220     $ 74,964  
                     
    _____________
    [1] For AFFO purposes, we add back unrealized (gain) loss. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, loss on derivative instruments was $3.9 million, which consisted of unrealized losses of $3.3 million and realized losses of $0.6 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2024, the gain on derivative instruments was $1.6 million which consisted of unrealized gains of $1.3 million and realized gains of $0.3 million.
    [2] Amounts relate to costs incurred related to the tax restructuring of our European entities. We do not consider these expenses to be part of our normal operating performance and have, accordingly, increased AFFO for these amounts.
    [3] Amounts include costs related to (i) compensation incurred for our former Co-Chief Executive Officer who retired effective March 31, 2024; (ii) a transition service agreement with our former advisor and; (iii) insurance premiums related to expiring directors and officers insurance of former RTL directors. We do not consider these expenses to be part of our normal operating performance and have, accordingly, increased AFFO for these amounts.
    [4] This is a non-cash item and is added back as it is not considered indicative of operating performance.
                     

    The following table provides operating financial information for the Company’s reportable segments:

        Three Months Ended March 31,
    (In thousands)     2025     2024
    Industrial & Distribution:        
    Revenue from tenants   $ 58,009   $ 61,994
    Property operating expense     5,257     4,644
    Net Operating Income   $ 52,752   $ 57,350
             
    Retail[1], [2]:        
    Revenue from tenants   $ 36,958   $ 42,595
    Property operating expense     3,906     5,098
    Net Operating Income   $ 33,052   $ 37,497
             
    Office[2]:        
    Revenue from tenants   $ 37,448   $ 35,096
    Property operating expense     4,790     5,258
    Net Operating Income   $ 32,658   $ 29,838
             
    Multi-Tenant Retail[3]:        
    Revenue from tenants   $ —   $ 8,195
    Property operating expense     —     2,796
    Net Operating Income   $ —   $ 5,399
                 
    _____________
    [1] Amounts in the Retail segment reflect the reclassification and inclusion of one property that was previously part of the Multi-Tenant Retail segment, which is not included in the Multi-Tenant Retail Disposition.
    [2] Amounts in the Retail segment and Office segment reflect changes to the reclassification of one tenant from the Office segment to the Retail segment to conform to the current year presentation based on a re-evaluation of the property type.
    [3] Reflects former Multi-Tenant Retail properties that were sold individually prior to December 31, 2024. Does not include the Multi-Tenant Retail Portfolio which is presented as a discontinued operation.
                 

    Caution on Use of Non-GAAP Measures

    Funds from Operations (“FFO”), Core Funds from Operations (“Core FFO”), Adjusted Funds from Operations (“AFFO”), Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”), Net Operating Income (“NOI”) and Cash Net Operating Income (“Cash NOI”) and Cash Paid for Interest should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP measures.

    Other REITs may not define FFO in accordance with the current National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”) definition (as we do), or may interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do, or may calculate Core FFO or AFFO differently than we do. Consequently, our presentation of FFO, Core FFO and AFFO may not be comparable to other similarly-titled measures presented by other REITs in our peer group.

    We consider FFO, Core FFO and AFFO useful indicators of our performance. Because FFO, Core FFO and AFFO calculations exclude such factors as depreciation and amortization of real estate assets and gain or loss from sales of operating real estate assets (which can vary among owners of identical assets in similar conditions based on historical cost accounting and useful-life estimates), FFO, Core FFO and AFFO presentations facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between other REITs.

    As a result, we believe that the use of FFO, Core FFO and AFFO, together with the required GAAP presentations, provide a more complete understanding of our operating performance including relative to our peers and a more informed and appropriate basis on which to make decisions involving operating, financing, and investing activities. However, FFO, Core FFO and AFFO are not indicative of cash available to fund ongoing cash needs, including the ability to make cash distributions. Investors are cautioned that FFO, Core FFO and AFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of our operating performance excluding these activities, as they exclude certain costs that have a negative effect on our operating performance during the periods in which these costs are incurred.

    Funds from Operations, Core Funds from Operations and Adjusted Funds from Operations

    Funds From Operations

    Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, NAREIT, an industry trade group, has promulgated a measure known as FFO, which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. FFO is not equivalent to net income or loss as determined under GAAP.

    We calculate FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards established over time by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as restated in a White Paper approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT effective in December 2018 (the “White Paper”). The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding depreciation and amortization related to real estate, gain and loss from the sale of certain real estate assets, gain and loss from change in control and impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to exclude the proportionate share of the non-controlling interest to arrive at FFO, Core FFO, AFFO and NOI attributable to stockholders, as applicable. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT’s definition.

    FFO includes adjustments related to the treatment of the sale of the Multi-Tenant Retail Portfolio as a discontinued operation, which includes adjustments for depreciation and amortization and loss (gain) on dispositions of real estate investments.

    The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, and straight-line amortization of intangibles, which implies that the value of a real estate asset diminishes predictably over time. We believe that, because real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation and certain other items may be less informative. Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate related depreciation and amortization, among other things, provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income.

    Core Funds From Operations

    In calculating Core FFO, we start with FFO, then we exclude certain non-core items such as merger, transaction and other costs, as well as certain other costs that are considered to be non-core, such as debt extinguishment or modification costs. The purchase of properties, and the corresponding expenses associated with that process, is a key operational feature of our core business plan to generate operational income and cash flows in order to make dividend payments to stockholders. In evaluating investments in real estate, we differentiate the costs to acquire the investment from the subsequent operations of the investment. We also add back non-cash write-offs of deferred financing costs, prepayment penalties and certain other costs incurred with the early extinguishment or modification of debt which are included in net income but are considered financing cash flows when paid in the statement of cash flows. We consider these write-offs and prepayment penalties to be capital transactions and not indicative of operations. By excluding expensed acquisition, transaction and other costs as well as non-core costs, we believe Core FFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management’s analysis of the investing and operating performance of our properties.

    Core FFO includes adjustments related to the treatment of the sale of the Multi-Tenant Retail Portfolio as a discontinued operation, which includes adjustments for acquisition and transaction costs and loss on extinguishment of debt.

    Adjusted Funds From Operations

    In calculating AFFO, we start with Core FFO, then we exclude certain income or expense items from AFFO that we consider more reflective of investing activities, other non-cash income and expense items and the income and expense effects of other activities or items, including items that were paid in cash that are not a fundamental attribute of our business plan or were one time or non-recurring items. These items include, for example, early extinguishment or modification of debt and other items excluded in Core FFO as well as unrealized gain and loss, which may not ultimately be realized, such as gain or loss on derivative instruments, gain or loss on foreign currency transactions, and gain or loss on investments. In addition, by excluding non-cash income and expense items such as amortization of above-market and below-market leases intangibles, amortization of deferred financing costs, straight-line rent and equity-based compensation from AFFO, we believe we provide useful information regarding income and expense items which have a direct impact on our ongoing operating performance. We also exclude revenue attributable to the reimbursement by third parties of financing costs that we originally incurred because these revenues are not, in our view, related to operating performance. We also include the realized gain or loss on foreign currency exchange contracts for AFFO as such items are part of our ongoing operations and affect our current operating performance.

    In calculating AFFO, we also exclude certain expenses which under GAAP are treated as operating expenses in determining operating net income. All paid and accrued acquisition, transaction and other costs (including prepayment penalties for debt extinguishments or modifications and merger related expenses) and certain other expenses, including expenses related to our European tax restructuring and transition costs related to the Merger and Internalization, negatively impact our operating performance during the period in which expenses are incurred or properties are acquired and will also have negative effects on returns to investors, but are excluded by us as we believe they are not reflective of our on-going performance. Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income. In addition, as discussed above, we view gain and loss from fair value adjustments as items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized and not reflective of ongoing operations and are therefore typically adjusted for when assessing operating performance. Excluding income and expense items detailed above from our calculation of AFFO provides information consistent with management’s analysis of our operating performance. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such changes that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gain or loss, we believe AFFO provides useful supplemental information. By providing AFFO, we believe we are presenting useful information that can be used to, among other things, assess our performance without the impact of transactions or other items that are not related to our portfolio of properties. AFFO presented by us may not be comparable to AFFO reported by other REITs that define AFFO differently. Furthermore, we believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, AFFO should be examined in conjunction with net income (loss) calculated in accordance with GAAP and presented in our consolidated financial statements. AFFO should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of our liquidity or ability to make distributions.

    Adjusted Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization, Net Operating Income, Cash Net Operating Income and Cash Paid for Interest

    We believe that Adjusted EBITDA, which is defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization adjusted for acquisition, transaction and other costs, other non-cash items and including our pro-rata share from unconsolidated joint ventures, is an appropriate measure of our ability to incur and service debt. We also exclude revenue attributable to the reimbursement by third parties of financing costs that we originally incurred because these revenues are not, in our view, related to operating performance. All paid and accrued acquisition, transaction and other costs (including prepayment penalties for debt extinguishments or modifications) and certain other expenses, including expenses related to our European tax restructuring and transition costs related to the Merger and Internalization, negatively impact our operating performance during the period in which expenses are incurred or properties are acquired and will also have negative effects on returns to investors, but are not reflective of on-going performance. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities, as a measure of our liquidity or as an alternative to net income (loss) as calculated in accordance with GAAP as an indicator of our operating activities. Other REITs may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently and our calculation should not be compared to that of other REITs.

    EBITDA includes adjustments related to the treatment of the sale of the Multi-Tenant Retail Portfolio as a discontinued operation, which includes adjustments for depreciation and amortization and interest expense. Adjusted EBITDA includes adjustments related to the treatment of the sale of the Multi-Tenant Retail Portfolio as a discontinued operation, which includes adjustments for merger, transaction and other costs, (loss) gain on dispositions of real estate investments, loss (gain) on derivative instruments, loss on extinguishment of debt and other income (expense).

    NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure equal to net income (loss), the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, less discontinued operations, interest, other income and income from preferred equity investments and investment securities, plus corporate general and administrative expense, acquisition, transaction and other costs, depreciation and amortization, other non-cash expenses and interest expense. We use NOI internally as a performance measure and believe NOI provides useful information to investors regarding our financial condition and results of operations because it reflects only those income and expense items that are incurred at the property level. Therefore, we believe NOI is a useful measure for evaluating the operating performance of our real estate assets and to make decisions about resource allocations. Further, we believe NOI is useful to investors as a performance measure because, when compared across periods, NOI reflects the impact on operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs and acquisition activity on an unlevered basis, providing perspective not immediately apparent from net income. NOI excludes certain components from net income in order to provide results that are more closely related to a property’s results of operations. For example, interest expense is not necessarily linked to the operating performance of a real estate asset and is often incurred at the corporate level as opposed to the property level. In addition, depreciation and amortization, because of historical cost accounting and useful life estimates, may distort operating performance at the property level. NOI presented by us may not be comparable to NOI reported by other REITs that define NOI differently. We believe that in order to facilitate a clear understanding of our operating results, NOI should be examined in conjunction with net income (loss) as presented in our consolidated financial statements. NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) as an indication of our performance or to cash flows as a measure of our liquidity.

    Cash NOI is a non-GAAP financial measure that is intended to reflect the performance of our properties. We define Cash NOI as net operating income (which is separately defined herein) excluding amortization of above/below market lease intangibles and straight-line rent adjustments that are included in GAAP lease revenues. We believe that Cash NOI is a helpful measure that both investors and management can use to evaluate the current financial performance of our properties and it allows for comparison of our operating performance between periods and to other REITs. Cash NOI should not be considered as an alternative to net income, as an indication of our financial performance, or to cash flows as a measure of liquidity or our ability to fund all needs. The method by which we calculate and present Cash NOI may not be directly comparable to the way other REITs calculate and present Cash NOI.

    Cash NOI includes all of the adjustments described above for Adjusted EBITDA related to the treatment of the sale of the Multi-Tenant Retail Portfolio as a discontinued operation, as well as adjustments for general and administrative expenses.

    Cash Paid for Interest is calculated based on the interest expense less non-cash portion of interest expense and amortization of mortgage (discount) premium, net. Management believes that Cash Paid for Interest provides useful information to investors to assess our overall solvency and financial flexibility. Cash Paid for Interest should not be considered as an alternative to interest expense as determined in accordance with GAAP or any other GAAP financial measures and should only be considered together with and as a supplement to our financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    The MIL Network –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Greenlight Re Announces First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Net Income Expands to $29.6 million Despite California Wildfire Losses,
    Leading to Fully Diluted Book Value Per Share Growth of 5.1%

    GRAND CAYMAN, Cayman Islands, May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (NASDAQ: GLRE) (“Greenlight Re” or the “Company”) today reported its financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    First Quarter 2025 Highlights (all comparisons are to first quarter 2024 unless noted otherwise):

    • Gross premiums written increased 14.1% to $247.9 million;
    • Net premiums earned increased 4.3% to $168.5 million;
    • Net underwriting loss of $7.8 million, compared to net underwriting income of $3.4 million;
    • Combined ratio of 104.6%, compared to 97.9%;
    • Total investment income of $40.5 million, compared to $31.4 million;
    • Net income of $29.6 million, or $0.86 per diluted ordinary share, compared to net income of $27.0 million, or $0.78 per diluted ordinary share; and
    • Fully diluted book value per share increased 5.1% to $18.87, from $17.95 at December 31, 2024.

    Greg Richardson, Chief Executive Officer of Greenlight Re, stated, “We delivered strong book value per share growth of 5.1% this quarter, driven by an outstanding return of 7.2% from our Solasglas investment portfolio despite challenging market conditions. These results more than offset the financial impact of the California wildfires, which contributed 14 combined ratio points for the quarter, in line with the preliminary loss estimates we previously disclosed.”

    David Einhorn, Chairman of the Board of Directors, said, “Our investment portfolio performed well during what appears to be the beginning of a bear market. We are positioning Solasglas to have low gross and net exposure as we ride out what should be a period of high volatility ahead of what we expect will be an improved investment opportunity set.”

    Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. First Quarter 2025 Earnings Call

    Greenlight Re will host a live conference call to discuss its financial results on Thursday, May 8, 2025, at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time. Dial-in details:
            
    U.S. toll free: 1-877-407-9753
    International: 1-201-493-6739

    The conference call can also be accessed via webcast at:
    https://event.webcasts.com/starthere.jsp?ei=1714274&tp_key=429d07a808

    A telephone replay will be available following the call through May 13, 2025. The replay of the call may be accessed by dialing 1-877-660-6853 (U.S. toll free) or 1-201-612-7415 (international), access code 13752944. An audio file of the call will also be available on the Company’s website, www.greenlightre.com.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    In presenting the Company’s results, management has included fully diluted book value per share as a financial measure that is not calculated under standards or rules that comprise accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). This measure is referred to as a non-GAAP measure. The non-GAAP measure may be defined or calculated differently by other companies. Management believes the measure allows for a more thorough understanding of the Company’s performance. The non-GAAP measure may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies and should be used to monitor our results and should be considered in addition to, and not viewed as a substitute for those measures determined in accordance with GAAP. Reconciliation of the measure to the most comparable GAAP figures is included in the attached financial information in accordance with Regulation G.

    Forward-Looking Statements
    This news release contains forward-looking statements concerning Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. and/or its subsidiaries (the “Company”) within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in the U.S. federal securities laws. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made on the Company’s behalf. These risks and uncertainties include a downgrade or withdrawal of our A.M. Best ratings; any suspension or revocation of any of our licenses; losses from catastrophes; the loss of significant brokers; the performance of Solasglas Investments, LP; the carry values of our investments made under our Greenlight Re Innovations segment may differ significantly from those that would be used if we carried these investments at fair value; and other factors described in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), as those factors may be updated from time to time in our periodic and other filings with the SEC, which are accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, which speak only as to the date of this release, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as provided by law.

    About Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd.
    Greenlight Re (www.greenlightre.com) provides multiline property and casualty insurance and reinsurance through its licensed and regulated reinsurance entities in the Cayman Islands and Ireland, and its Lloyd’s platform, Greenlight Innovation Syndicate 3456. The Company complements its underwriting activities with a non-traditional investment approach designed to achieve higher rates of return over the long term than reinsurance companies that exclusively employ more traditional investment strategies. The Company’s innovations unit, Greenlight Re Innovations, supports technology innovators in the (re)insurance space by providing investment capital, risk capacity, and access to a broad insurance network.

    Investor Relations Contact
    Karin Daly
    Vice President, The Equity Group Inc.
    (212) 836-9623
    IR@greenlightre.ky

           
    GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and share amounts)
           
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      (Unaudited)    
    Assets      
    Investments      
    Investment in related party investment fund, at fair value $ 435,341   $ 387,144
    Other investments   73,266     73,160
    Total investments   508,607     460,304
    Cash and cash equivalents   47,477     64,685
    Restricted cash and cash equivalents   595,282     584,402
    Reinsurance balances receivable (net of allowance for expected credit losses)   768,711     704,483
    Loss and loss adjustment expenses recoverable (net of allowance for expected credit losses)   87,963     85,790
    Deferred acquisition costs   96,759     82,249
    Unearned premiums ceded   38,895     29,545
    Other assets   8,402     4,765
    Total assets $ 2,152,096   $ 2,016,223
    Liabilities and equity      
    Liabilities      
    Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves $ 916,600   $ 860,969
    Unearned premium reserves   384,311     324,551
    Reinsurance balances payable   93,730     105,892
    Funds withheld   21,825     21,878
    Other liabilities   8,992     6,305
    Debt   59,834     60,749
    Total liabilities   1,485,292     1,380,344
    Shareholders’ equity      
    Ordinary share capital (par value $0.10; issued and outstanding, 34,557,449) (2024: par value $0.10; issued and outstanding, 34,831,324) $ 3,456   $ 3,483
    Additional paid-in capital   482,876     481,551
    Retained earnings   180,472     150,845
    Total shareholders’ equity   666,804     635,879
    Total liabilities and equity $ 2,152,096   $ 2,016,223
               
       
    GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
    (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except percentages and per share amounts)
       
      Three months ended March 31
        2025       2024  
    Underwriting results:      
    Gross premiums written $ 247,945     $ 217,258  
    Gross premiums ceded   (28,548 )     (23,181 )
    Net premiums written   219,397       194,077  
    Change in net unearned premium reserves   (50,934 )     (32,541 )
    Net premiums earned $ 168,463     $ 161,536  
    Net loss and LAE incurred:      
    Current year $ (118,666 )   $ (103,925 )
    Prior year   (4,218 )     (5,401 )
    Net loss and LAE incurred   (122,884 )     (109,326 )
    Acquisition costs   (46,866 )     (41,610 )
    Underwriting expenses   (6,358 )     (6,339 )
    Deposit interest expense, net   (149 )     (876 )
    Net underwriting income (loss) $ (7,794 )   $ 3,385  
           
    Income from investment in Solasglas $ 32,197     $ 18,248  
    Net investment income   8,287       13,178  
    Total investment income $ 40,484     $ 31,426  
           
    Corporate and other expenses $ (4,672 )   $ (4,375 )
    Foreign exchange gains (losses)   4,355       (1,649 )
    Interest expense   (1,464 )     (1,249 )
    Income tax expense   (1,282 )     (519 )
    Net income $ 29,627     $ 27,019  
           
    Earnings per share      
    Basic $ 0.87     $ 0.79  
    Diluted $ 0.86     $ 0.78  
           
    Underwriting ratios:      
    Current year loss ratio   70.4 %     64.3 %
    Prior year reserve development ratio   2.5 %     3.3 %
    Loss ratio   72.9 %     67.6 %
    Acquisition cost ratio   27.8 %     25.8 %
    Composite ratio   100.7 %     93.4 %
    Underwriting expense ratio   3.9 %     4.5 %
    Combined ratio   104.6 %     97.9 %
                   
                   

    The following tables present the Company’s results by segment and on a consolidated basis:

                   
    GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.
    SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
    (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
    Three months ended March 31, 2025
                   
      Open Market   Innovations   Corporate   Total Consolidated
    Gross premiums written $ 220,709     $ 27,466     $ (230 )   $ 247,945  
    Net premiums written $ 195,609     $ 23,971     $ (183 )   $ 219,397  
    Net premiums earned $ 149,641     $ 19,005     $ (183 )   $ 168,463  
    Net loss and LAE incurred   (112,763 )     (10,346 )     225       (122,884 )
    Acquisition costs   (40,881 )     (6,033 )     48       (46,866 )
    Other underwriting expenses   (4,797 )     (1,561 )     —       (6,358 )
    Deposit interest expense, net   (149 )     —       —       (149 )
    Underwriting income (loss)   (8,949 )     1,065       90       (7,794 )
    Net investment income   5,771       448       2,068       8,287  
    Corporate and other expenses   —       (572 )     (4,100 )     (4,672 )
    Income from investment in Solasglas   —       —       32,197       32,197  
    Foreign exchange gains (losses)   —       —       4,355       4,355  
    Interest expense   —       —       (1,464 )     (1,464 )
    Income (loss) before income taxes $ (3,178 )   $ 941     $ 33,146     $ 30,909  
                   
    Underwriting ratios:              
    Loss ratio   75.4 %     54.4 %     123.0 %     72.9 %
    Acquisition cost ratio   27.3 %     31.7 %     26.2 %     27.8 %
    Composite ratio   102.7 %     86.1 %     149.2 %     100.7 %
    Underwriting expenses ratio   3.3 %     8.2 %     — %     3.9 %
    Combined ratio   106.0 %     94.3 %     149.2 %     104.6 %
                                   
                   
    GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.
    SEGMENT RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
    (expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars)
    Three months ended March 31, 2024
                   
      Open Market   Innovations   Corporate   Total Consolidated
    Gross premiums written $ 187,061     $ 30,068     $ 129     $ 217,258  
    Net premiums written $ 167,716     $ 26,244     $ 117     $ 194,077  
    Net premiums earned $ 131,610     $ 20,197     $ 9,729     $ 161,536  
    Net loss and LAE incurred   (86,700 )     (13,127 )     (9,499 )     (109,326 )
    Acquisition costs   (33,579 )     (6,053 )     (1,978 )     (41,610 )
    Other underwriting expenses   (5,478 )     (861 )     —       (6,339 )
    Deposit interest expense, net   (876 )     —       —       (876 )
    Underwriting income (loss)   4,977       156       (1,748 )     3,385  
    Net investment income   12,616       (183 )     745       13,178  
    Corporate and other expenses   —       (590 )     (3,785 )     (4,375 )
    Income from investment in Solasglas           18,248       18,248  
    Foreign exchange gains (losses)           (1,649 )     (1,649 )
    Interest expense           (1,249 )     (1,249 )
    Income (loss) before income taxes $ 17,593     $ (617 )   $ 10,562     $ 27,538  
                   
    Underwriting ratios:              
    Loss ratio   65.9 %     65.0 %     97.6 %     67.6 %
    Acquisition cost ratio   25.5 %     30.0 %     20.3 %     25.8 %
    Composite ratio   91.4 %     95.0 %     117.9 %     93.4 %
    Underwriting expenses ratio   4.8 %     4.3 %     — %     4.5 %
    Combined ratio   96.2 %     99.3 %     117.9 %     97.9 %
                                   
    GREENLIGHT CAPITAL RE, LTD.
    KEY FINANCIAL MEASURES AND NON-GAAP MEASURES
     

    Management uses certain key financial measures, some of which are not prescribed under U.S. GAAP rules and standards (“non-GAAP financial measures”), to evaluate our financial performance, financial position, and the change in shareholder value. Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure, as defined in SEC Regulation G, is a numerical measure of a company’s historical or future financial performance, financial position, or cash flows that either excludes or includes amounts that are not normally excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented under U.S. GAAP. We believe that these measures, which may be calculated or defined differently by other companies, provide consistent and comparable metrics of our business performance to help shareholders understand performance trends and facilitate a more thorough understanding of the Company’s business. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be viewed as substitutes for those determined under U.S. GAAP.

    The key non-GAAP financial measure used in this news release is:

    • Fully diluted book value per share

    This non-GAAP financial measure is described below.

    Fully Diluted Book Value Per Share

    Our primary financial goal is to increase fully diluted book value per share over the long term. We use fully diluted book value as a financial measure in our incentive compensation plan.

    We believe that long-term growth in fully diluted book value per share is the most relevant measure of our financial performance because it provides management and investors a yardstick to monitor the shareholder value generated. Fully diluted book value per share may also help our investors, shareholders, and other interested parties form a basis of comparison with other companies within the property and casualty reinsurance industry. Fully diluted book value per share should not be viewed as a substitute for the most comparable U.S. GAAP measure, which in our view is the basic book value per share.

    We calculate basic book value per share as (a) ending shareholders’ equity, divided by (b) the total ordinary shares issued and outstanding, as reported in the consolidated financial statements. Fully diluted book value per share represents basic book value per share combined with any dilutive impact of in-the-money stock options (assuming net exercise) and all outstanding restricted stock units, “RSUs”. We believe these adjustments better reflect the ultimate dilution to our shareholders.

    The following table presents a reconciliation of the fully diluted book value per share to basic book value per share (the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure):

                       
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
      March 31,
    2024
    Numerator for basic and fully diluted book value per share:                  
    Total equity as reported under U.S. GAAP $ 666,804   $ 635,879   $ 663,418   $ 634,020   $ 624,458
    Denominator for basic and fully diluted book value per share:                  
    Ordinary shares issued and outstanding as reported and denominator for basic book value per share   34,557,449     34,831,324     34,832,493     35,321,144     35,321,144
    Add: In-the-money stock options (1) and all outstanding RSUs   773,938     590,001     602,013     594,612     585,334
    Denominator for fully diluted book value per share   35,331,387     35,421,325     35,434,506     35,915,756     35,906,478
                       
    Basic book value per share $ 19.30   $ 18.26   $ 19.05   $ 17.95   $ 17.68
    Fully diluted book value per share $ 18.87   $ 17.95   $ 18.72   $ 17.65   $ 17.39
    (1) Assuming net exercise by the grantee.
     

    The MIL Network –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: APA Corporation Announces First-Quarter 2025 Financial and Operational Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HOUSTON, May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — APA Corporation (Nasdaq: APA) today announced first-quarter 2025 results. Results can be found on the company’s website by visiting www.apacorp.com or investor.apacorp.com.

    APA will host a conference call on May 8 at 10 a.m. Central time via the webcast link available on the company website to discuss the results. Following the conference call, a replay will be available for one year on the “Investors” page of the company’s website.

    About APA

    APA Corporation owns consolidated subsidiaries that explore for and produce oil and natural gas in the United States, Egypt and the United Kingdom and that explore for oil and natural gas offshore Suriname and elsewhere. APA posts announcements, operational updates, investor information and press releases on its website, www.apacorp.com.

         
    Contacts    
         
    Investor:   (281) 302-2286
    Media:   (713) 296-7276
    Website:   www.apacorp.com 
         

    APA-F

    The MIL Network –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cotton to Gabbard: Do Not Assist German Surveillance of Political Opposition

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Arkansas Tom Cotton
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: Caroline Tabler or Patrick McCann (202) 224-2353May 7, 2025
    Cotton to Gabbard: Do Not Assist German Surveillance of Political Opposition
    Washington, D.C. — Senator Tom Cotton (R-Arkansas) today sent a letter to Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence requesting a pause on all intelligence sharing with Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the BvF, that could be used to target political opponents. This letter comes after the BvF’s recent classification of German opposition party Alternative for Germany (AfD) as a “proven right-wing extremist organization.”
    In part, Senator Cotton wrote: 
    “I understand that liberal elites on both sides of the Atlantic loathe the AfD, but AfD’s platform has resonated with many Germans. Unsurprisingly so, since an agenda of strong borders, energy independence, and economic growth has appealed to our own electorate and may other Western democracies. Rather than trying to undermine the AfD using the tools of authoritarian states, Germany’s incoming government might be better advised to consider why the AfD continues to gain electoral ground and how German’s government can address the reasonable concerns of its citizens.”
    Full text of the letter may be found here and below. 
    The Honorable Tulsi Gabbard
    Director of National Intelligence 
    1500 Tysons McLean Drive 
    McLean, VA 22102
    Dear Director Gabbard:
    In support of the Trump administration’s goals to prevent the weaponization of our nation’s intelligence agencies, I urge you to ensure that foreign intelligence collected by those agencies isn’t shared with the German government to be used against its political opposition.
    On May 2, Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV) classified the Alternative for Germany (AfD) Party as a “proven right-wing extremist organization.” Under German law, this decision allows BfV to intensify surveillance on AfD through signals collection and the use of undercover informants to support a potential party ban. In other words, German intelligence can now eavesdrop, monitor, and infiltrate Germany’s main opposition party and its second largest vote-getter in the recent elections. One would expect such police-state activities in dictatorships like Communist China and Russia—not Western Europe’s largest country. 
    I understand that liberal elites on both sides of the Atlantic loathe the AfD, but AfD’s platform has resonated with many Germans. Unsurprisingly so, since an agenda of strong borders, energy independence, and economic growth has appealed to our own electorate and may other Western democracies. Rather than trying to undermine the AfD using the tools of authoritarian states, Germany’s incoming government might be better advised to consider why the AfD continues to gain electoral ground and how the German government can address the reasonable concerns of its citizens. 
    Until the German government treats the AfD as a legitimate opposition party and not as a “right-wing extremist organization,” I ask that you direct our intelligence agencies to take the follow actions:
    Pause the sharing of intelligence with BfV that could be used to target the AfD,
    Refuse requests of assistance from the BfV to surveil AfD and its members, and
    Review whether our intelligence agencies under the Biden administration cooperated with German requests to surveil the AfD or other opposition parties and notify the Senate of the findings of the review.
    Sincerely,
    Tom Cotton
    Chairman

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Amid Trump Tariff Uncertainty, Oregon’s Entire Democratic Delegation Rallies Behind West Coast Seafood Industry

    Source: US Representative Val Hoyle (OR-04)

    May 07, 2025

    After devastating order cancellations due to tariffs, Wyden, Merkley, Bonamici, Bynum, Dexter, Hoyle and Salinas ask USDA to buy West Coast pink shrimp

    For Immediate Release: May 7, 2025

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S Representative Val Hoyle, along with U.S. Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley and U.S. Representatives Suzanne Bonamici, Janelle Bynum, Maxine Dexter, and Andrea Salinas today rallied behind the West Coast seafood industry by asking the U.S. Department of Agriculture to buy Oregon pink shrimp as soon as possible to help lessen the damage from Donald Trump’s tariffs. 

     “Commercial fishing, seafood processing, and distribution is an integral part of the numerous small ports and rural communities that dot America’s Pacific coast,” the legislators wrote in a letter to Bruce Summers, USDA Agricultural Marketing Services Administrator. “The industry contributes hundreds of millions of dollars and thousands of jobs to the region’s economy, all while providing the nation with domestic, high-quality seafood that is caught, processed, and distributed by hardworking Americans.”

    The West Coast seafood industry is struggling as chaotic tariff decisions create uncertainty and devastation in Oregon’s vital seafood industry. Reports of major order cancellations paired with a prolific pink shrimp harvest have set up Oregon’s rural, coastal communities for potentially ruinous losses without support from the USDA. 

    The request asks the USDA to use a legal authority known as “Section 32” to stimulate demand during challenging economic times by buying surplus foods, which are then distributed to schools, childcare centers, and food banks in need.

     “As the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) continues its work to develop a national seafood strategy that provides economic opportunity to rural communities, promotes production that better nourishes Americans, and secures a robust domestic food supply, we urge USDA to extend support and relief at the earliest opportunity,” the Oregon lawmakers wrote.

    “The loss of this significant market, coupled with the United Kingdom’s recent denial of the industry’s request for the United Kingdom to suspend its existing 20% tariff on imports of U.S. Pacific pink shrimp, poses a serious threat to the industry as supply increases rapidly with no viable outlet,” the legislators cautioned. “We urge you to use your Section 32 purchase authority to support these hardworking Americans and businesses at every point along the supply chain, and to mitigate the economic impact from the loss of these foreign markets to our coastal communities.”

    The West Coast seafood industry has voiced its urgent need for timely federal support.

    “We are incredibly grateful to Senator Wyden and the Oregon delegation for supporting the pink shrimp industry during these tumultuous and uncertain times,” West Coast Seafood Processors Association Director Lori Steele said. “A Section 32 purchase from USDA would help offset some of the major losses we are seeing in our global markets and provide an outlet for our product in the U.S. just as the 2025 season ramps up. We appreciate our delegation’s understanding of how important this is to Oregon’s coastal communities.”

    Full text of the letter is here.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Silvaco Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Achieved gross bookings of $13.7 million and revenue of $14.1 million in the first quarter 2025

    Signed 9 new customers in the first quarter 2025 and expanded relationship with existing customers across key markets including AI, Photonics, and IoT

    Expanded Product Portfolio with the Acquisition of Tech-X Corporation

    SANTA CLARA, Calif., May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Silvaco Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: SVCO) (“Silvaco” or the “Company”), a provider of TCAD, EDA software, and SIP solutions that enable innovative semiconductor design and digital twin modeling through AI software and automation, today announced its first quarter 2025 results.

    “We are pleased to have completed our first acquisition since our IPO in the first quarter of 2025, and have since announced our second acquisition of 2025, advancing our inorganic growth strategy and expanding our product portfolio,” said Dr. Babak Taheri, Silvaco’s Chief Executive Officer. Dr. Taheri continued, “We believe our solid fundamentals and focus on innovation position us to sustain strong customer momentum and drive continued growth in our EDA and TCAD product lines through 2025. We are committed to defending shareholder value through performance, transparency, and responsible capital management. We believe the fundamentals of Silvaco are strong—and we’re taking clear, measurable steps to align our market presence with the long-term strength of our business.”

    Commenting on the financial results and outlook, Keith Tainsky, Silvaco’s Interim Chief Financial Officer, added, “Given the current economic uncertainty, we have provided a broad guidance range for the second quarter of 2025. The company remains well positioned to deliver solid growth, supported by strong customer demand. We also updated our full-year guidance and remain confident in our ability to achieve our strategic and financial objectives.”

    First Quarter 2025 and Recent Business Highlights

    • Acquired 9 new customers across key markets including AI infrastructure (Power, Memory, Foundry) Photonics, and IoT markets, which represented approximately 23% of gross bookings for the quarter. We also expanded opportunities with existing customers, which accounted for 38% of gross bookings.
    • Gained momentum with Power, Photonics, and Advanced CMOS customers as they expand adoption of the FTCO platform for their next-generation product development. We announced that Excelliance MOS adopted Silvaco DTCO Flow for next generation silicon carbide devices and our partnership with Korean Kyung Hee University’s Professor Jin Jang on FTCO for next generation display technologies.
    • Expanded SAM by an estimated $600 million with the acquisitions of Cadence’s PPC product line and Tech-X Corporation.
    • Faraday Technology selected Silvaco FlexCAN IP for advanced automotive ASIC design.
    • ProMOS adopted our Victory TCAD solution for the development of next generation silicon photonics devices.
    • On April 29, 2025, Silvaco closed the acquisition of Tech-X Corporation, expanding our product offerings into wafer-level and photonics digital twin modeling.
    • Beginning with this quarter, we will be providing a new performance metric called Annual Contract Value, or ACV. We use ACV internally as a supplemental measure to evaluate the performance of our customer agreements and the underlying momentum of the business. While not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP, we believe ACV provides additional insight into the scale and timing of customer commitments, which may not be fully reflected in recognized revenue due to the timing of revenue recognition under ASC 606.

    First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    GAAP Financial Results

    • Revenue of $14.1 million, down 11% year-over-year and down 21% quarter-over-quarter.
      • TCAD revenue of $7.9 million, down 26% year-over-year, primarily due to earlier renewals last year.
      • EDA revenue of $5.1 million, up 8% year-over-year, including the addition of PPC product revenue of $1.9 million.
      • SIP revenue of $1.1 million, up 89% year-over-year, primarily driven by new bookings in automotive and IoT customers.
    • GAAP gross profit and GAAP gross margin were $11.1 million and 79%, respectively, which includes the impact of $0.2 million in stock-based compensation expense, and $0.2 million in amortization of acquired intangible assets, down from $13.9 million and 88% in Q1 2024.
    • GAAP net loss of $19.3 million, compared to a GAAP net income of $1.4 million in Q1 2024.
    • GAAP basic net loss per share of $(0.67), compared to GAAP basic and diluted net income per share of $0.07 in Q1 2024.
    • As of March 31, 2025, cash and cash equivalents and marketable securities totaled $74.5 million.

    Key Operating Indicators and Non-GAAP Financial Results:

    • Gross bookings were $13.7 million, down 15% year-over-year.
    • As of March 31, 2025, the remaining performance obligation balance of $33.7 million, 45% of which is expected to be recognized as revenue in the next 12 months.
    • Non-GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP gross margin were $11.5 million and 82%, respectively, down from $13.9 million and 88% in Q1 2024.
    • Non-GAAP net loss of $1.9 million, compared to non-GAAP net income of $2.4 million in Q1 2024.
    • Non-GAAP diluted net loss per share of $(0.07), compared to non-GAAP diluted net income per share of $0.12 in Q1 2024.
    • On a trailing-twelve-month (TTM) basis ACV was $52.3 million for the first quarter, up 21% year-over-year. This increase was driven by the amount of growth in organic growth of term-based licenses and renewals, as well as the acquisition of PPC. While quarterly revenue may fluctuate, core annual recurring revenue from new bookings has shown consistent annual growth.

    For a discussion of the non-GAAP metrics presented in this press release, as well as a reconciliation of non-GAAP metrics to the nearest comparable GAAP metric, see “Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Key Business Metrics” and “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation” in the accompanying tables below.

    Supplementary materials to this press release, including first quarter 2025 financial results, can be found at https://investors.silvaco.com/financial-information/quarterly-results.

    Second Quarter and Full Year 2025 Financial Outlook

    As of May 7, 2025, Silvaco is providing updated guidance for its second quarter of 2025 and its full-year 2025, which represents Silvaco’s current estimates on its operations and financial results. The financial information below represents forward-looking financial information and in some instances forward-looking, non-GAAP financial information, including estimates of non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss) and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share. GAAP gross margin is the most comparable GAAP measure to non-GAAP gross margin and GAAP operating income (loss) is the most comparable GAAP measure to non-GAAP operating income (loss). GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share is the most comparable GAAP measure to non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share. Non-GAAP gross margin differs from GAAP gross margin in that it excludes items such as stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, and acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses. Non-GAAP operating income (loss) differs from GAAP operating income (loss) in that it excludes items such as acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses and IPO preparation costs. Non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share differs from GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share in that it excludes certain costs, including IPO preparation costs, acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses, change in fair value of contingent consideration, foreign exchange (gain) loss, and the income tax effect on non-GAAP items. Silvaco is unable to predict with reasonable certainty the ultimate outcome of these exclusions without unreasonable effort. Therefore, Silvaco has not provided guidance for GAAP gross margin, GAAP operating income or GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share or a reconciliation of the forward-looking non-GAAP gross margin or non-GAAP operating income or non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share guidance to GAAP gross margin or GAAP operating income or GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share, respectively. However, it is important to note that these excluded items could be material to our results computed in accordance with GAAP in future periods.

    Based on current business trends and conditions, the Company expects for second quarter 2025 the following:

    • Gross bookings in the range of $14.0 million to $18.0 million, which would compare to $19.5 million in the second quarter of 2024.
    • Revenue in the range of $12.0 million to $16.0 million, which would compare to $15.0 million in the second quarter of 2024.
    • Non-GAAP gross margin in the range of 80% to 83%, which would compare to 86% in the second quarter of 2024.
    • Non-GAAP operating loss in the range of ($4.0) million to ($2.0) million, compared to non-GAAP operating income of $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2024.
    • Non-GAAP diluted net loss per share in the range of ($0.10) to ($0.03), compared to net income per share of $0.07 in the second quarter of 2024.

    Based on current business trends and conditions, the Company expects for full year 2025, the following:

    • Gross bookings in the range of $67.0 million to $74.0 million, which would represent a 2% to 13% increase from $65.8 million in 2024.
    • Revenue in the range of $64.0 million to $70.0 million, which would represent a 7% to 17% increase from $59.7 million in 2024.
    • Non-GAAP gross margin in the range of 83% to 86%, which would compare to 86% in 2024.
    • Non-GAAP operating (loss) income in the range of ($2.0) million loss to $1.0 million income, which would compare to $5.5 million income in 2024.
    • Non-GAAP diluted net (loss) income per share in the range of ($0.07) net loss per share to $0.03 net income per share, compared to $0.25 net income per share in 2024.

    Q1 2025 Conference Call Details

    A press release highlighting the Company’s results along with supplemental financial results will be available at https://investors.silvaco.com/ along with an earnings presentation to accompany management’s prepared remarks. An archived replay of the conference call will be available on this website for a limited time after the call. Participants who want to join the call and ask a question may register for the call here to receive the dial-in numbers and unique PIN.

    Date: Wednesday, May 7, 2025
    Time: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time
    Webcast: Here (live and replay)

    About Silvaco

    Silvaco is a provider of TCAD, EDA software, and SIP solutions that enable semiconductor design and digital twin modeling through AI software and innovation. Silvaco’s solutions are used for semiconductor and photonics processes, devices, and systems development across display, power devices, automotive, memory, high performance compute, foundries, photonics, internet of things, and 5G/6G mobile markets for complex SoC design. Silvaco is headquartered in Santa Clara, California, and has a global presence with offices located in North America, Europe, Brazil, China, Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Taiwan.

    Safe Harbor Statement

    This press release contains forward-looking statements based on Silvaco’s current expectations. The words “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “plan”, “project”, “will”, and similar phrases as they relate to Silvaco are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements reflect the current views and assumptions of Silvaco and are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations.

    These forward-looking statements include but are not limited to, statements regarding our future operating results, financial position, and guidance, our business strategy and plans, our objectives for future operations, our development or delivery of new or enhanced products, and anticipated results of those products for our customers, our competitive positioning, projected costs, technological capabilities, and plans, and macroeconomic trends.

    A variety of risks and factors that are beyond our control could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements including, without limitation, the following: (a) market conditions; (b) anticipated trends, challenges and growth in our business and the markets in which we operate; (c) our ability to appropriately respond to changing technologies on a timely and cost-effective basis; (d) the size and growth potential of the markets for our software solutions, and our ability to serve those markets; (e) our expectations regarding competition in our existing and new markets; (f) the level of demand in our customers’ end markets; (g) regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries; (h) changes in trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs; (i) proposed new software solutions, services or developments; (j) our ability to attract and retain key management personnel; (k) our customer relationships and our ability to retain and expand our customer relationships; (l) our ability to diversify our customer base and develop relationships in new markets; (m) the strategies, prospects, plans, expectations, and objectives of management for future operations; (n) public health crises, pandemics, and epidemics and their effects on our business and our customers’ businesses; (o) the impact of the current conflicts between Ukraine and Russia and Israel and Hamas and the ongoing trade disputes among the United States and China on our business, financial condition or prospects, including extreme volatility in the global capital markets making debt or equity financing more difficult to obtain, more costly or more dilutive, delays and disruptions of the global supply chains and the business activities of our suppliers, distributors, customers and other business partners; (p) changes in general economic or business conditions or economic or demographic trends in the United States and foreign countries including changes in tariffs, interest rates and inflation; (q) our ability to raise additional capital; (r) our ability to accurately forecast demand for our software solutions; (s) our expectations regarding the outcome of any ongoing litigation; (t) our ability to successfully integrate recent acquisitions; (u) our expectations regarding the period during which we qualify as an emerging growth company under the JOBS Act and as a smaller reporting company under the Exchange Act; (v) our expectations regarding our ability to obtain, maintain, protect and enforce intellectual property protection for our technology; (w) our status as a controlled company; and (x) our use of the net proceeds from our initial public offering.

    It is not possible for us to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. Accordingly, you should not rely on any of the forward-looking statements. Additional information relating to the uncertainty affecting Silvaco’s business is contained in Silvaco’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These documents are available on the SEC Filings section of the Investor Relations section of Silvaco’s website at http://investors.silvaco.com/. These forward-looking statements represent Silvaco’s expectations as of the date of this press release. Subsequent events may cause these expectations to change, and Silvaco disclaims any obligation to update or alter these forward-looking statements in the future, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Key Business Metrics

    We use certain non-GAAP financial measures to supplement the performance measures in our consolidated financial statements, which are presented in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures include non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss), and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision-making and as a means to assist us in evaluating period-to-period comparisons.

    We define non-GAAP gross profit and non-GAAP gross margin as our GAAP gross profit and GAAP gross margin adjusted to exclude certain costs, including stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets and acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses. We define non-GAAP operating income (loss), as our GAAP operating income (loss) adjusted to exclude certain costs, including IPO preparation costs, acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, and acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses. We define non-GAAP net income (loss) as our GAAP net income (loss) adjusted to exclude certain costs, including IPO preparation costs, acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs, stock-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonuses, change in fair value of contingent consideration, foreign exchange (gain) loss, and the income tax effect on non-GAAP items. Our non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share is calculated in the same way as our non-GAAP net income (loss), but on a per share basis. We monitor non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss) and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share as non-GAAP financial measures to supplement the financial information we present in accordance with GAAP to provide investors with additional information regarding our financial results.

    Certain items are excluded from our non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss) and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share because these items are non-cash in nature or are not indicative of our core operating performance and render comparisons with prior periods and competitors less meaningful. We adjust GAAP gross profit, GAAP gross margin, GAAP operating income (loss), GAAP net income (loss), and GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share for these items to arrive at non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss), and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share because these amounts can vary substantially from company to company within our industry depending upon accounting methods and book values of assets, capital structure and the method by which the assets were acquired. By excluding certain items that may not be indicative of our recurring core operating results, we believe that non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss) and non-GAAP diluted net income (loss) per share provide meaningful supplemental information regarding our performance.

    We believe these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors and others because they allow for additional information with respect to financial measures used by management in its financial and operational decision-making and they may be used by our institutional investors and the analyst community to help them analyze our financial performance and the health of our business. However, there are a number of limitations related to the use of non-GAAP financial measures, and these non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for or in isolation from, our financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP. Other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate these non-GAAP financial measures differently or not at all, which reduces their usefulness as comparative measures.

    Annual Contract Value (“ACV”) is a key performance metric for Silvaco and is useful to investors in assessing the strength and trajectory of the business. ACV is a supplemental metric to help evaluate the annual performance of the business. Over the life of the contract, ACV equals the total value realized from a customer. ACV is not impacted by the timing of license revenue recognition. ACV is used by management in financial and operational decision-making. ACV is not a replacement for, and should be viewed independently of, GAAP revenue and deferred revenue, as ACV is a performance metric and is not intended to be combined with any of these items. There is no GAAP measure comparable to ACV.

    ACV is composed of the following: (i) the annualized value of term based software licenses with start dates or anniversary dates during the period, plus; (ii) the value of perpetual license contracts with start dates during the period, plus; (iii) the annualized value of maintenance & support as well as any fixed-term services contracts with start dates or anniversary dates during the period, plus; (iv) the value of fixed-deliverable services contracts. Silvaco and the Silvaco logo are registered trademarks of Silvaco Group, Inc. All other trademarks and service marks are the property of their respective owners.

    SILVACO GROUP, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Unaudited, in thousands except share and par value amounts)
           
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024
    ASSETS      
    Current assets:      
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 29,489     $ 19,606  
    Current marketable securities   45,048       63,071  
    Accounts receivable, net   5,783       9,211  
    Contract assets, net   15,102       11,932  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   4,500       3,460  
    Total current assets   99,922       107,280  
    Non-current assets:      
    Non-current marketable securities   —       4,785  
    Property and equipment, net   890       865  
    Operating lease right-of-use assets, net   1,534       1,711  
    Intangible assets, net   9,997       4,369  
    Goodwill   14,337       9,026  
    Non-current portion of contract assets   9,860       12,611  
    Other assets   1,595       1,698  
    Total non-current assets   38,213       35,065  
    Total assets $ 138,135     $ 142,345  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
    Current liabilities:      
    Accounts payable $ 2,137     $ 3,316  
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities   32,426       19,801  
    Accrued income taxes   1,728       1,668  
    Deferred revenue, current   8,618       7,497  
    Operating lease liabilities, current   644       744  
    Vendor financing obligation, current   1,191       1,462  
    Total current liabilities   46,744       34,488  
    Non-current liabilities:      
    Deferred revenue, non-current   3,604       3,593  
    Operating lease liabilities, non-current   866       946  
    Vendor financing obligation, non-current   2,995       2,928  
    Other non-current liabilities   333       307  
    Total liabilities   54,542       42,262  
    Stockholders’ equity:      
    Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 , respectively   —       —  
    Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 28,805,280 and 28,526,615 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively   3       3  
    Additional paid-in capital   132,937       130,360  
    Accumulated deficit   (47,285 )     (28,012 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (2,062 )     (2,268 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   83,593       100,083  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 138,135     $ 142,345  
           
           
    SILVACO GROUP, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (LOSS) INCOME
    (Unaudited, in thousands except share and par value amounts)
           
      Three Months Ended March 31,
        2025       2024  
    Revenue:      
    Software license revenue $ 10,009     $ 12,258  
    Maintenance and service   4,083       3,631  
    Total revenue   14,092       15,889  
    Cost of revenue   3,016       1,973  
    Gross profit   11,076       13,916  
    Operating expenses:      
    Research and development   4,800       3,616  
    Selling and marketing   4,719       3,312  
    General and administrative   8,120       4,600  
    Estimated litigation claim   13,069       —  
    Total operating expenses   30,708       11,528  
    Operating (loss) income   (19,632 )     2,388  
    Interest income   863       —  
    Interest and other expense, net   (291 )     (205 )
    (Loss) income before income tax provision   (19,060 )     2,183  
    Income tax provision   213       805  
    Net (loss) income $ (19,273 )   $ 1,378  
    Net (loss) income per share:      
    Basic and diluted $ (0.67 )   $ 0.07  
    Weighted average shares used in computing per share amounts:      
    Basic and diluted   28,694,295       20,000,000  
           
           
    SILVACO GROUP, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    (Unaudited, in thousands)
           
      Three Months Ended March 31,
        2025       2024  
    Cash flows from operating activities:      
    Net (loss) income $ (19,273 )   $ 1,378  
    Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:      
    Depreciation and amortization   438       120  
    Stock-based compensation expense   2,277       —  
    Provision for credit losses   10       222  
    Estimated litigation claim   13,069       —  
    Accretion of discount on marketable securities, net   (261 )     —  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration   35       (8 )
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
    Accounts receivable   3,520       (1,844 )
    Contract assets   440       (3,679 )
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   (1,026 )     788  
    Other assets   119       (274 )
    Accounts payable   (1,183 )     877  
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities   55       (729 )
    Accrued income taxes   58       574  
    Deferred revenue   567       (21 )
    Other non-current liabilities   20       24  
    Net cash used in operating activities   (1,135 )     (2,572 )
    Cash flows from investing activities:      
    Maturities of marketable securities   23,000       —  
    Acquisition of Process Proximity Compensation   (11,500 )     —  
    Purchases of property and equipment   (96 )     (10 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities   11,404       (10 )
    Cash flows from financing activities:      
    Proceeds from loan facility   —       4,250  
    Deferred transaction costs   —       (364 )
    Payroll taxes related to shares withheld from employees   (252 )     —  
    Contingent consideration   (46 )     (13 )
    Payments of vendor financing obligation   (205 )     —  
    Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities   (503 )     3,873  
    Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents   117       27  
    Net increase in cash and cash equivalents   9,883       1,318  
    Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period   19,606       4,421  
    Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 29,489     $ 5,739  
           
    SILVACO GROUP, INC.
    REVENUE
    (Unaudited)
        2024   2025
        Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Year   Q1
    Revenue by Region:                
    Americas   27 % 51 % 31 % 40 % 38 %   20 %
    APAC   62 % 41 % 58 % 52 % 53 %   66 %
    EMEA   11 % 8 % 11 % 8 % 9 %   14 %
    Total revenue   100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %   100 %
                     
    Revenue by Product Line:                
    TCAD   66 % 69 % 59 % 71 % 68 %   56 %
    EDA   30 % 20 % 24 % 24 % 24 %   36 %
    SIP   4 % 11 % 17 % 5 % 8 %   8 %
    Total revenue   100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %   100 %
                     
    Revenue Item Category:                
    Software license revenue   77 % 74 % 62 % 78 % 74 %   71 %
    Maintenance and service   23 % 26 % 38 % 22 % 26 %   29 %
    Total revenue   100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %   100 %
                     
    Revenue by Country:                
    United States   26 % 50 % 30 % 39 % 37 %   20 %
    China   11 % 17 % 25 % 23 % 18 %   14 %
    Other   63 % 33 % 45 % 38 % 45 %   66 %
    Total revenue   100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %   100 %
                     
    SILVACO GROUP, INC.
    GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliation
    (Unaudited, in thousands except per share amounts)
     
      Three Months Ended
      3/31/2025   3/31/2024
           
    GAAP Cost of revenue $ 3,016     $ 1,973  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense   (199 )     —  
    Less: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   (249 )     —  
    Less: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   (8 )     —  
    Non-GAAP Cost of revenue $ 2,560     $ 1,973  
    GAAP Gross profit $ 11,076     $ 13,916  
    Add: Stock-based compensation expense   199       —  
    Add: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   249       —  
    Add: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   8       —  
    Non-GAAP Gross profit $ 11,532     $ 13,916  
    GAAP Research and development $ 4,800     $ 3,616  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense   (244 )     —  
    Less: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   (18 )     —  
    Less: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   (51 )     (70 ) 
    Non-GAAP Research and development $ 4,487     $ 3,546  
    GAAP Selling and marketing $ 4,719     $ 3,312  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense   (323 )      —  
    Less: IPO preparation costs   —       -127  
    Non-GAAP Selling and marketing $ 4,396     $ 3,185  
    GAAP General and administrative $ 8,120     $ 4,600  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense   (1,511 )     —  
    Less: Acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs   (726 )     (594 )
    Less: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   (677 )     —  
    Less: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   (62 )     —  
    Less: IPO preparation costs   —       (139 )
    Non-GAAP General and administrative $ 5,144     $ 3,867  
    GAAP Estimated litigation claim $ 13,069     $ —  
    Less: Acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs   (13,069 )     —  
    Non-GAAP Estimated litigation claim $ —     $ —  
    GAAP Operating expenses $ 30,708     $ 11,528  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense   (2,078 )     —  
    Less: Acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs   (13,795 )     (594 )
    Less: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   (695 )     —  
    Less: IPO preparation costs   —       (266 )
    Less: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   (113 )     (70 )
    Non-GAAP Operating expenses $ 14,027     $ 10,598  
    GAAP Operating (loss) income $ (19,632 )   $ 2,388  
    Add: Stock-based compensation expense   2,277       —  
    Add: Acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs   13,795       594  
    Add: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   703       —  
    Add: IPO preparation costs   —       266  
    Add: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   362       70  
    Non-GAAP Operating (loss) income $ (2,495 )   $ 3,318  
    GAAP Net (loss) income $ (19,273 )   $ 1,378  
    Add: Stock-based compensation expense   2,277       —  
    Add: Acquisition-related estimated litigation claim and legal costs   13,795       594  
    Add: Acquisition-related professional fees and retention bonus   703       —  
    Add: IPO preparation costs   —       266  
    Add: Amortization of acquired intangible assets   362       70  
    Add (Less): Change in fair value of contingent consideration   35       (8 )
    Add (Less): Foreign exchange (gain) loss   205       130  
    Add (Less): Income tax effect of non-GAAP adjustment   (5 )     (33 )
    Non-GAAP Net (loss) income $ (1,901 )   $ 2,397  
    GAAP Net income (loss) per share:      
    Basic and diluted: $ (0.67 )   $ 0.07  
    Non-GAAP Net income (loss) per share:      
    Basic and diluted $ (0.07 )   $ 0.12  
    Weighted average shares used in GAAP and non-GAAP net income (loss) per share:      
    Basic and diluted   28,694,295       20,000,000  
           

    Investor Contact:
    Greg McNiff
    investors@silvaco.com 

    Media Contact:
    Farhad Hayat
    press@silvaco.com

    The MIL Network –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Cerence Announces Second Quarter Fiscal 2025 Results; Revenue and Profitability Exceed High End of Guidance

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Headlines

    • Revenue of $78M; free cash flow of $13.1M marks fourth consecutive positive quarter
    • Company reiterates full-year guidance for revenue and raises full-year guidance for profitability and cash flow
    • Continued innovation and customer momentum for Cerence xUI, the company’s next-gen platform

    BURLINGTON, Mass., May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Cerence Inc. (NASDAQ: CRNC) (“Cerence AI”), a global leader pioneering conversational AI-powered user experiences, today reported its second quarter fiscal year 2025 results for the quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    Results Summary (1,2)
    (in millions, except per share data)

        Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
        March 31,     March 31,  
        2025     2024     2025     2024  
    GAAP revenue (4)   $ 78.0     $ 67.8     $ 128.9     $ 206.2  
    GAAP gross margin     77.1 %     69.2 %     72.3 %     77.1 %
    GAAP total operating expenses (3)   $ 42.8     $ 311.3     $ 92.8     $ 364.7  
    Non-GAAP total operating expenses   $ 34.1     $ 50.0     $ 68.2     $ 94.4  
    GAAP net income (loss) (3)   $ 21.7     $ (278.0 )   $ (2.6 )   $ (254.1 )
    Adjusted EBITDA   $ 29.5     $ (0.3 )   $ 30.8     $ 70.1  
    Free cash flow   $ 13.1     $ (0.8 )   $ 21.0     $ (4.5 )
    GAAP net income (loss) per share – diluted (3)   $ 0.46     $ (6.66 )   $ (0.06 )   $ (6.13 )
     
    (1) As previously disclosed, for the six months ended March 31, 2024, revenue includes the non-cash revenue associated with the Toyota “Legacy” contract and related impacts totaling $86.6M.
    (2) Please refer to the “Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” and “Reconciliations of GAAP Financial Measures to Non-GAAP Financial Measures” included elsewhere in this release for more information regarding our use of non-GAAP financial measures.
    (3) As previously disclosed, for the six months ended March 31, 2024, operating expenses include a Goodwill impairment charge of $252M.
    (4) Q2FY25 and Q2FY24 revenue include $21.5 million and $10.4 million of revenue from fixed license contracts, respectively.
     

    “I’m incredibly proud of what our team has accomplished. We surpassed the high end of our revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance and posted our fourth consecutive quarter of positive free cash flow, demonstrating the high value we provide to the world’s leading automakers as they work through the ongoing macro uncertainties and complexities facing the industry today,” said Brian Krzanich, CEO, Cerence AI. “As we look to the future and based on currently available information, we believe we are well-positioned to continue supporting our customers as they work to bring an enhanced experience to their drivers. With Cerence xUI, we are partnering with OEMs as they contemplate and build their future infotainment platforms, as well as delivering enhanced user experiences via over-the-air updates as automakers upgrade their current systems to deliver next-gen features and capabilities to their drivers today.” 

    Cerence Key Performance Indicators
    To help investors gain further insight into Cerence’s business and its performance, management provides a set of key performance indicators that includes:

    Key Performance Indicator1   Q2FY25
    Percent of worldwide auto production with Cerence Technology (trailing twelve months (“TTM”))   51 %
    Change in number of Cerence connected cars shipped (TTM over prior year TTM)2   10 %
    Change in Adjusted Total Billings (TTM over prior year TTM)3   0 %
           
    (1) Please refer to the “Key Performance Indicators” section included elsewhere in this release for more information regarding the definitions and our use of key performance indicators.
    (2) Based on IHS Markit data, global auto production decreased 1%, calculated TTM over prior year TTM.
    (3) Adjusted Total Billings excludes professional services and prepay contracts and is adjusted for prepay consumption. Change in Adjusted Total Billings is calculated TTM over prior year TTM.
           

    Third Quarter and Full Year Fiscal 2025 Outlook
    For the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2025, revenue is expected to be in the range of $52 million to $56 million, where no material Fixed License revenue contracts are expected to be signed during the quarter. Gross margins are projected between 66% and 68% and net loss is projected in the range of $13 million to $10 million. Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be in the range of $1 million to $4 million. The adjusted EBITDA guidance excludes amortization of acquired intangible assets, stock-based compensation, restructuring and other costs.

    Revenue guidance for the full fiscal year ending September 30, 2025 remains unchanged; however, net loss is now projected in the range of $35 million to $29 million, adjusted EBITDA is now expected to be in the range of $28 million to $34 million, net cash provided by operating activities is projected in the range of $39 million to $45 million, and free cash flow is expected in the range of $25 million to $35 million.

    Additional details regarding guidance will be provided during the company’s earnings call.

    Cerence Conference Call and Webcast
    The company will host a live conference call and webcast with slides to discuss its results today at 5:00pm Eastern Time / 2:00pm Pacific Time. Interested investors and analysts are invited to dial into the conference call by registering here.

    Webcast access also will be available on the Investor section of the company’s website at https://www.cerence.com/investors/events-and-resources.

    A replay of the webcast can be accessed by visiting the company’s website 90 minutes following the conference call at https://www.cerence.com/investors/events-and-resources.

    Forward Looking Statements
    Statements in this press release regarding: Cerence’s future performance, results and financial condition; expected growth and profitability; outlook and momentum; transformation plans and cost efficiency initiatives; strategy; opportunities; business, industry and market trends; strategy regarding fixed contracts and its impact on financial results; backlog; revenue visibility; revenue timing and mix; demand for Cerence products; innovation and new product offerings, including AI technology; expected benefits of technology partnerships; and management’s future expectations, anticipations, intentions, estimates, assumptions, beliefs, goals, objectives, targets, plans, outlook or prospects constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements that are not statements of historical fact (including statements containing the words “believes,” “plans,” “goal,” “objective,” “anticipates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” “expects,” “intends,” “continues,” “will,” “may,” or “estimates” or similar expressions) should also be considered to be forward-looking statements. Although we believe forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions as of the date of this press release, such statements involve known and unknown risk, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual results or performance of the company to be materially different from any future results or performance expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements including but not limited to: the highly competitive and rapidly changing market in which we operate; adverse conditions in the automotive industry or the global economy more generally; volatility in the political, legal and regulatory environment in which we operate, including trade, tariffs and other policies implemented by the new administration in the United States or actions taken by other countries in response; automotive production curtailment or delays; changes in customer forecasts; the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our and our customers’ businesses; the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East; our inability to control and successfully manage our expenses and cash position; our inability to deliver improved financial results from process optimization efforts and cost reduction actions; escalating pricing pressures from our customers; the impact on our business of the transition to a lower level of fixed contracts, including the failure to achieve such a transition; our failure to win, renew or implement service contracts; the cancellation or postponement of existing contracts; the loss of business from any of our largest customers; effects of customer defaults; a decrease in the level of professional service projects; our inability to successfully introduce new products, applications and services; our strategies to increase cloud offerings and deploy generative AI and large language models (LLMs); the inability to expand into adjacent markets; the inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel; disruptions arising from transitions in management personnel; cybersecurity and data privacy incidents; failure to protect our intellectual property; adverse developments related to our intellectual property enforcement litigation, the outcome of such litigation, or remedies that could be awarded in connection with such litigation; defects or interruptions in service with respect to our products; fluctuating currency rates and interest rates; inflation; financial and credit market volatility; restrictions on our current and future operations under the terms of our debt, the use of cash to service or repay our debt; and our inability to generate sufficient cash from our operations; and the other factors discussed in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of developments occurring after the date of this document.

    Discussion of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    We believe that providing the non-GAAP information, in addition to the GAAP presentation, allows investors to view the financial results in the way management views the operating results. We further believe that providing this information allows investors to not only better understand our financial performance, but more importantly, to evaluate the efficacy of the methodology and information used by management to evaluate and measure such performance. The non-GAAP information should not be considered superior to, or a substitute for, financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.

    We utilize a number of different financial measures, both GAAP and non-GAAP, in analyzing and assessing the overall performance of the business, for making operating decisions and for forecasting and planning for future periods. While our management uses these non-GAAP financial measures as a tool to enhance their understanding of certain aspects of our financial performance, our management does not consider these measures to be a substitute for, or superior to, the information provided by GAAP financial statements.

    Consistent with this approach, we believe that disclosing non-GAAP financial measures to the readers of our financial statements provides such readers with useful supplemental data that, while not a substitute for GAAP financial statements, allows for greater transparency in the review of our financial and operational performance. In assessing the overall health of the business during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, our management has either included or excluded the following items in general categories, each of which is described below.

    Adjusted EBITDA.
    Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income attributable to Cerence Inc. before net income (loss) attributable to income tax (benefit) expense, other income (expense) items, net, depreciation and amortization expense, and excluding amortization of acquired intangible assets, stock-based compensation, and restructuring and other costs, net and impairment charges related to fixed and intangible assets and gains or losses on the sale of long-lived assets, if any. From time to time we may exclude from Adjusted EBITDA the impact of events, gains, losses or other charges (such as significant legal settlements) that affect the period-to-period comparability of our operating performance. Other income (expense) items, net include interest expense, interest income, and other income (expense), net (as stated in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations). Our management and Board of Directors use this financial measure to evaluate our operating performance. It is also a significant performance measure in our annual incentive compensation programs. 

    Restructuring and other costs, net.
    Restructuring and other costs, net include restructuring expenses as well as other charges that are unusual in nature, are the result of unplanned events, and arise outside the ordinary course of our business such as employee severance costs, consulting costs relating to our transformation initiatives, and costs for consolidating duplicate facilities.

    Amortization of acquired intangible assets.
    We exclude the amortization of acquired intangible assets from non-GAAP expense and income measures. These amounts are inconsistent in amount and frequency and are significantly impacted by the timing and size of acquisitions. Providing a supplemental measure which excludes these charges allows management and investors to evaluate results “as-if” the acquired intangible assets had been developed internally rather than acquired and, therefore, provides a supplemental measure of performance in which our acquired intellectual property is treated in a comparable manner to our internally developed intellectual property. Although we exclude amortization of acquired intangible assets from our non-GAAP expenses, we believe that it is important for investors to understand that such intangible assets contribute to revenue generation. Amortization of intangible assets that relate to past acquisitions will recur in future periods until such intangible assets have been fully amortized. Future acquisitions may result in the amortization of additional intangible assets.

    Stock-based compensation.
    Because of varying valuation methodologies, subjective assumptions and the variety of award types, we exclude stock-based compensation from our operating results. We evaluate performance both with and without these measures because compensation expense related to stock-based compensation is typically non-cash and awards granted are influenced by the Company’s stock price and other factors such as volatility that are beyond our control. The expense related to stock-based awards is generally not controllable in the short-term and can vary significantly based on the timing, size and nature of awards granted. As such, we do not include such charges in operating plans. Stock-based compensation will continue in future periods.

    Other expenses.
    We exclude certain other expenses that result from unplanned events outside the ordinary course of continuing operations, in order to measure operating performance and current and future liquidity both with and without these expenses. By providing this information, we believe management and the users of the financial statements are better able to understand the financial results of what we consider to be our organic, continuing operations. Included in these expenses are items such as other charges (credits), net, (gains) losses from extinguishment of debt, and changes in indemnification assets corresponding with the release of pre-spin liabilities for uncertain tax positions.

    Key Performance Indicators
    We believe that providing key performance indicators (“KPIs”) allows investors to gain insight into the way management views the performance of the business. We further believe that providing KPIs allows investors to better understand information used by management to evaluate and measure such performance. KPIs should not be considered superior to, or a substitute for, operating results prepared in accordance with GAAP. In assessing the performance of the business during the three months ended March 31, 2025, our management has reviewed the following KPIs, each of which is described below:

    • Percent of worldwide auto production with Cerence Technology (TTM): The number of Cerence enabled cars shipped as compared to IHS Markit car production data.
    • Change in number of Cerence connected cars shipped: The year-over-year change in the number of cars shipped with Cerence connected solutions. Amounts calculated on a TTM basis.
    • Change in Adjusted total billings YoY (TTM): The year over year change in total billings excluding Professional Services, prepay billings and adjusted for prepay consumption. TTM over prior year TTM.

    See the tables at the end of this press release for non-GAAP reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

    To learn more about Cerence AI, visit www.cerence.ai, and follow the company on LinkedIn.

    About Cerence Inc.
    Cerence Inc. (NASDAQ: CRNC) is a global industry leader in creating intuitive, seamless, AI-powered experiences across automotive and transportation. Leveraging decades of innovation and expertise in voice, generative AI, and large language models, Cerence powers integrated experiences that create safer, more connected, and more enjoyable journeys for drivers and passengers alike. With more than 500 million cars shipped with Cerence technology, the company partners with leading automakers, transportation OEMs, and technology companies to advance the next generation of user experiences. Cerence is headquartered in Burlington, Massachusetts, with operations globally and a worldwide team dedicated to pushing the boundaries of AI innovation. For more information, visit www.cerence.ai.

    CERENCE INC.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (in thousands, except per share data)
    (unaudited)

      Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
      March 31,     March 31,  
      2025     2024     2025     2024  
    Revenues:                      
    License $ 51,460     $ 35,527     $ 74,185     $ 56,350  
    Connected services   12,648       13,597       26,355       110,417  
    Professional services   13,902       18,701       28,366       39,393  
    Total revenues   78,010       67,825       128,906       206,160  
    Cost of revenues:                      
    License   2,432       1,404       4,214       3,008  
    Connected services   4,979       5,359       11,290       12,662  
    Professional services   10,418       14,119       20,149       31,444  
    Amortization of intangible assets   —       —       —       103  
    Total cost of revenues   17,829       20,882       35,653       47,217  
    Gross profit   60,181       46,943       93,253       158,943  
    Operating expenses:                      
    Research and development   23,332       31,846       44,201       65,152  
    Sales and marketing   4,930       5,619       9,696       11,690  
    General and administrative   11,199       16,659       23,953       29,452  
    Amortization of intangible assets   536       555       1,090       1,100  
    Restructuring and other costs, net   2,832       4,551       13,894       5,256  
    Goodwill impairment   —       252,096       —       252,096  
    Total operating expenses   42,829       311,326       92,834       364,746  
    Income (loss) from operations   17,352       (264,383 )     419       (205,803 )
    Interest income   918       1,190       2,355       2,622  
    Interest expense   (2,716 )     (3,111 )     (6,109 )     (6,347 )
    Other income (expense), net   499       (25 )     771       1,397  
    Income (loss) before income taxes   16,053       (266,329 )     (2,564 )     (208,131 )
    (Benefit from) provision for income taxes   (5,603 )     11,647       68       45,988  
    Net income (loss) $ 21,656     $ (277,976 )   $ (2,632 )   $ (254,119 )
    Net income (loss) per share:                      
    Basic $ 0.50     $ (6.66 )   $ (0.06 )   $ (6.13 )
    Diluted $ 0.46     $ (6.66 )   $ (0.06 )   $ (6.13 )
    Weighted-average common share outstanding:                      
    Basic   43,223       41,724       43,059       41,452  
    Diluted   51,530       41,724       43,059       41,452  
                                   

    CERENCE INC.
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (in thousands, except per share amounts)

      March 31,     September 30,  
      2025     2024  
      (Unaudited)        
    ASSETS          
    Current assets:          
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 117,368       121,485  
    Marketable securities   5,413       5,502  
    Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $54 and $1,613   65,018       62,755  
    Deferred costs   4,737       5,286  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   39,633       70,481  
    Total current assets   232,169       265,509  
    Long-term marketable securities   –       3,453  
    Property and equipment, net   29,412       30,139  
    Deferred costs   15,960       18,051  
    Operating lease right of use assets   17,989       12,879  
    Goodwill   293,357       296,858  
    Intangible assets, net   551       1,706  
    Deferred tax assets   55,248       51,398  
    Other assets   20,860       22,365  
    Total assets $ 665,546     $ 702,358  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY          
    Current liabilities:          
    Accounts payable $ 6,634     $ 3,959  
    Deferred revenue   49,740       52,822  
    Short-term operating lease liabilities   3,958       4,528  
    Short-term debt   60,056       87,094  
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities   37,506       68,405  
    Total current liabilities   157,894       216,808  
    Long-term debt   197,593       194,812  
    Deferred revenue, net of current portion   119,954       114,354  
    Long-term operating lease liabilities   14,557       8,803  
    Other liabilities   26,279       26,484  
    Total liabilities   516,277       561,261  
    Stockholders’ Equity:          
    Common stock, $0.01 par value, 560,000 shares authorized; 43,254 and 41,924 shares issued and outstanding, respectively   433       419  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (28,814 )     (25,912 )
    Additional paid-in capital   1,102,022       1,088,330  
    Accumulated deficit   (924,372 )     (921,740 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   149,269       141,097  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 665,546     $ 702,358  
                   

    CERENCE INC.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (in thousands)
    (unaudited)

      Six Months Ended  
      March 31,  
      2025     2024  
    Cash flows from operating activities:          
    Net loss $ (2,632 )   $ (254,119 )
    Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operations:          
    Depreciation and amortization   5,793       5,384  
    Provision for credit loss reserve   208       6,065  
    Stock-based compensation   13,702       13,125  
    Non-cash interest expense   3,348       2,939  
    Loss on debt extinguishment   (327 )     –  
    Deferred tax (benefit) provision   (4,271 )     40,949  
    Goodwill impairment   –       252,096  
    Unrealized foreign currency transaction losses (gains)   345       (262 )
    Other, net   (33 )     474  
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:          
    Accounts receivable   (8,029 )     (75 )
    Prepaid expenses and other assets   25,250       5,854  
    Deferred costs   2,041       3,423  
    Accounts payable   2,492       (292 )
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities   (23,532 )     (1,673 )
    Deferred revenue   10,365       (75,659 )
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities   24,720       (1,771 )
    Cash flows from investing activities:          
    Capital expenditures   (3,703 )     (2,776 )
    Purchases of marketable securities   –       –  
    Sale and maturities of marketable securities   3,493       3,912  
    Other investing activities   (716 )     (891 )
    Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities   (926 )     245  
    Cash flows from financing activities:          
    Proceeds from revolving credit facility   –       –  
    Proceeds from long-term debt, net of discount   –       –  
    Payments for long-term debt issuance costs   –       –  
    Principal payments of short-term debt   (26,964 )     –  
    Common stock repurchases for tax withholdings for net settlement of equity awards   (2,171 )     (9,744 )
    Principal payment of lease liabilities arising from a finance lease   (229 )     (202 )
    Proceeds from the issuance of common stock   2,175       10,461  
    Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities   (27,189 )     515  
    Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents   (722 )     (967 )
    Net change in cash and cash equivalents   (4,117 )     (1,978 )
    Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period   121,485       101,154  
    Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 117,368     $ 99,176  
                   

    CERENCE INC.
    Reconciliations of GAAP Financial Measures to Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    (unaudited – in thousands)

      Three Months Ended     Six Months Ended  
      March 31,     March 31,  
      2025     2024     2025     2024  
    GAAP revenue $ 78,010     $ 67,825     $ 128,906     $ 206,160  
                           
    GAAP gross profit $ 60,181     $ 46,943     $ 93,253     $ 158,943  
    GAAP gross margin   77.1 %     69.2 %     72.3 %     77.1 %
                           
    GAAP total operating expenses $ 42,829     $ 311,326     $ 92,834     $ 364,746  
    Stock-based compensation   5,374       4,079       9,692       11,818  
    Amortization of intangible assets   536       555       1,090       1,203  
    Restructuring and other costs, net   2,832       4,551       13,894       5,256  
    Goodwill impairment   –       252,096       –       252,096  
    Non-GAAP total operating expenses $ 34,087     $ 50,045     $ 68,158     $ 94,373  
                           
    GAAP net income (loss) $ 21,656     $ (277,976 )   $ (2,632 )   $ (254,119 )
    Stock-based compensation*   5,931       4,745       10,739       13,125  
    Amortization of intangible assets   536       555       1,090       1,203  
    Restructuring and other costs, net*   2,832       4,551       13,894       5,256  
    Goodwill impairment   –       252,096       –       252,096  
    Depreciation   2,812       2,143       4,703       4,181  
    Total other expense, net   1,299       1,946       2,983       2,328  
    (Benefit from) provision for income taxes   (5,603 )     11,647       68       45,988  
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 29,463     $ (293 )   $ 30,845     $ 70,058  
                           
    GAAP net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ 15,466     $ 1,044     $ 24,720     $ (1,771 )
    Capital expenditures   (2,343 )     (1,845 )     (3,703 )     (2,776 )
    Free cash flow $ 13,123     $ (801 )   $ 21,017     $ (4,547 )
    * – $3.0 million in stock-based compensation is included in Restructuring and other costs, net for the six months ended March 31, 2025.
       

    The MIL Network –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Fortinet Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Highlights

    • Total revenue of $1.54 billion, up 14% year over year
    • Product revenue of $459 million, up 12% year over year
    • Billings of $1.60 billion, up 14% year over year1
    • Unified SASE ARR2up 26% and Security Operations ARR2up 30%, year over year
    • Record first quarter GAAP operating margin of 29%
    • Record first quarter Non-GAAP operating margin of 34%1
    • Record Cash flow from operations of $863 million
    • Record Free cash flow of $783 million1

    SUNNYVALE, Calif., May 07, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Fortinet® (Nasdaq: FTNT), a global cybersecurity leader driving the convergence of networking and security, today announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    “We are pleased to report another strong quarter as non-GAAP operating margin increased 570 basis points year over year to a first quarter record of 34%, while billings grew 14% year over year,” said Ken Xie, Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fortinet. “We continue to accelerate our growth strategy by investing in the rapidly expanding Unified SASE and Security Operations markets, while strengthening our leadership in Secure Networking. Leveraging our deep expertise in networking and security convergence, a strong track record of AI-driven innovation, and seamless product development and integration through our FortiOS operating system, we have established ourselves as the leader in organic innovation and will continue setting the industry standard in cybersecurity.”

    Financial Highlights for the First Quarter of 2025

    • Revenue: Total revenue was $1.54 billion for the first quarter of 2025, an increase of 13.8% compared to $1.35 billion for the same quarter of 2024.
    • Product Revenue: Product revenue was $459.1 million for the first quarter of 2025, an increase of 12.3% compared to $408.9 million for the same quarter of 2024.
    • Service Revenue: Service revenue was $1.08 billion for the first quarter of 2025, an increase of 14.4% compared to $944.4 million for the same quarter of 2024.
    • Billings1: Total billings were $1.60 billion for the first quarter of 2025, an increase of 13.5% compared to $1.41 billion for the same quarter of 2024.
    • Remaining performance obligations: Remaining performance obligations were $6.49 billion as of March 31, 2025, an increase of 11.7% compared to $5.81 billion as of March 31, 2024. We expect to recognize approximately $3.38 billion as revenue over the next 12 months, an increase of 15.4% compared to $2.93 billion as of March 31, 2024.
    • Unified SASE ARR2: Unified SASE ARR was $1.15 billion as of March 31, 2025, an increase of 25.7% compared to $914.7 million as of March 31, 2024.
    • Security Operations ARR2: Security Operations ARR was $434.5 million as of March 31, 2025, an increase of 30.3% compared to $333.5 million as of March 31, 2024.
    • GAAP Operating Income and Margin: GAAP operating income was $453.8 million for the first quarter of 2025, representing a GAAP operating margin of 29.5%. GAAP operating income was $321.2 million for the same quarter of 2024, representing a GAAP operating margin of 23.7%.
    • Non-GAAP Operating Income and Margin1: Non-GAAP operating income was $526.2 million for the first quarter of 2025, representing a non-GAAP operating margin of 34.2%. Non-GAAP operating income was $386.1 million for the same quarter of 2024, representing a non-GAAP operating margin of 28.5%.
    • GAAP Net Income and Diluted Net Income Per Share: GAAP net income was $433.4 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to GAAP net income of $299.3 million for the same quarter of 2024. GAAP diluted net income per share was $0.56 for the first quarter of 2025, based on 776.8 million diluted weighted-average shares outstanding, compared to GAAP diluted net income per share of $0.39 for the same quarter of 2024, based on 770.5 million diluted weighted-average shares outstanding.
    • Non-GAAP Net Income and Diluted Net Income Per Share1: Non-GAAP net income was $452.3 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to non-GAAP net income of $333.9 million for the same quarter of 2024. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share was $0.58 for the first quarter of 2025, based on 776.8 million diluted weighted-average shares outstanding, compared to $0.43 for the same quarter of 2024, based on 770.5 million diluted weighted-average shares outstanding.
    • Cash Flow: Cash flow from operations was $863.3 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to $830.4 million for the same quarter of 2024. Cash flow from operations for the first quarter of 2025 includes $14.0 million proceeds from an intellectual property matter.
    • Free Cash Flow1: Free cash flow was $782.8 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to $608.5 million for the same quarter of 2024.

    Guidance

    For the second quarter of 2025, Fortinet currently expects:

    • Revenue in the range of $1.590 billion to $1.650 billion
    • Billings in the range of $1.685 billion to $1.765 billion
    • Non-GAAP gross margin in the range of 80.0% to 81.0%
    • Non-GAAP operating margin in the range of 31.5% to 32.5%
    • Diluted non-GAAP net income per share in the range of $0.58 to $0.60, assuming a non-GAAP effective tax rate of 18%. This assumes a diluted share count of 773 million to 777 million.

    For the fiscal year 2025, Fortinet currently expects:

    • Revenue in the range of $6.650 billion to $6.850 billion
    • Service revenue in the range of $4.575 billion to $4.725 billion
    • Billings in the range of $7.200 billion to $7.400 billion
    • Non-GAAP gross margin in the range of 79.0% to 81.0%
    • Non-GAAP operating margin in the range of 31.5% to 33.5%
    • Diluted non-GAAP net income per share in the range of $2.43 to $2.49, assuming a non-GAAP effective tax rate of 18%. This assumes a diluted share count of 769 million to 779 million.

    These statements are forward looking and actual results may differ materially. Refer to the Forward-Looking Statements section below for information on the factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements.

    Our guidance with respect to non-GAAP financial measures excludes stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, gain on intellectual property matters, gain on bargain purchase related to acquisition, gain from an equity method investment and a tax adjustment required for an effective tax rate on a non-GAAP basis, which differs from the GAAP effective tax rate. We have not reconciled our guidance with respect to non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP measures because certain items that impact these measures are uncertain or out of our control, or cannot be reasonably predicted. Accordingly, a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the corresponding GAAP measures is not available without unreasonable effort.

    1 A reconciliation of GAAP to non-GAAP measures has been provided in the financial statement tables included in this press release. An explanation of these measures is also included below under the heading “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.
    2 Annual Recurring Revenue or ARR is defined as the annualized value of renewable / recurring customer agreements as of the measurement date, assuming any contract that expires during the next 12 months is renewed at its existing value.

    Conference Call Details

    Fortinet will host a conference call today at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time (4:30 p.m. Eastern Time) to discuss the earnings results. A live webcast of the conference call and supplemental slides will be accessible from the Investor Relations page of Fortinet’s website at https://investor.fortinet.com and a replay will be archived and accessible at https://investor.fortinet.com/events-and-presentations.

    Second Quarter 2025 Conference Participation Schedule:

    • J.P. Morgan Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference
      May 13, 2025
    • Bank of America Global Technology Conference
      June 3, 2025

    Members of Fortinet’s management team are expected to present at these conferences and discuss the latest company strategies and initiatives. Fortinet’s conference presentations are expected to be available via webcast on the company’s website. To access the most updated information, pre-register and listen to the webcast of each event, please visit the Investor Presentation & Events page of Fortinet’s website at https://investor.fortinet.com/events-and-presentations. The schedule is subject to change.

    About Fortinet (www.fortinet.com)

    Fortinet (Nasdaq: FTNT) is a driving force in the evolution of cybersecurity and the convergence of networking and security. Our mission is to secure people, devices and data everywhere, and today we deliver cybersecurity everywhere our customers need it with the largest integrated portfolio of over 50 enterprise-grade products. Well over half a million customers trust Fortinet’s solutions, which are among the most deployed, most patented and most validated in the industry. The Fortinet Training Institute, one of the largest and broadest training programs in the industry, is dedicated to making cybersecurity training and new career opportunities available to everyone. Collaboration with esteemed organizations from both the public and private sectors, including Computer Emergency Response Teams (“CERTs”), government entities, and academia, is a fundamental aspect of Fortinet’s commitment to enhance cyber resilience globally. FortiGuard Labs, Fortinet’s elite threat intelligence and research organization, develops and utilizes leading-edge machine learning and AI technologies to provide customers with timely and consistently top-rated protection and actionable threat intelligence. Learn more at https://www.fortinet.com, the Fortinet Blog or FortiGuard Labs.

    Copyright © 2025 Fortinet, Inc. All rights reserved. The symbols ® and ™ denote respectively federally registered trademarks and common law trademarks of Fortinet, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliates. Fortinet’s trademarks include, but are not limited to, the following: Fortinet, the Fortinet logo, FortiGate, FortiOS, FortiGuard, FortiCare, FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager, FortiASIC, FortiClient, FortiCloud, FortiCore, FortiMail, FortiSandbox, FortiADC, FortiAgent, FortiAI, FortiAIOps, FortiAntenna, FortiAP, FortiAPCam, FortiAppSec, FortiAuthenticator, FortiBranchSASE, FortiCache, FortiCall, FortiCam, FortiCamera, FortiCarrier, FortiCART, FortiCASB, FortiCentral, FortiCNP, FortiConnect, FortiController, FortiConverter, FortiCSPM, FortiCWP, FortiDAST, FortiDATA, FortiDB, FortiDDoS, FortiDeceptor, FortiDeploy, FortiDevice, FortiDevSec, FortiDLP, FortiEdge, FortiEDR, FortiEndpoint, FortiExplorer, FortiExtender, FortiFirewall, FortiFlex, FortiFone, FortiGSLB, FortiGuest, FortiHypervisor, FortiInsight, FortiIsolator, FortiLAN, FortiLink, FortiMonitor, FortiNAC, FortiNDR, FortiPAM, FortiPenTest, FortiPhish, FortiPoint, FortiPoints, FortiPolicy, FortiPortal, FortiPresence, FortiProxy, FortiRecon, FortiRecorder, FortiSASE, FortiScanner, FortiSDNConnector, FortiSEC, FortiSIEM, FortiSMS, FortiSOAR, FortiSRA, FortiSwitch, FortiTelemetry, FortiTester, FortiTIP, FortiToken, FortiTrust, FortiVoice, FortiWAN, FortiWeb, FortiWiFi, FortiWLC, FortiWLM, FortiXDR, Lacework FortiCNAPP, Linksys, Intelligent Mesh, Velop, Max-Stream, Performance Perfected and SECURITY FABRIC. Other trademarks belong to their respective owners. Fortinet has not independently verified statements or certifications herein attributed to third parties and Fortinet does not independently endorse such statements. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, nothing herein constitutes a warranty, guarantee, contract, binding specification or other binding commitment by Fortinet or any indication of intent related to a binding commitment, and performance and other specification information herein may be unique to certain environments.

    FTNT-F

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include statements regarding any indications related to future growth and market share gains, our strategy going forward, and guidance and expectations around future financial results, including guidance and expectations for the second quarter and full year 2025, and any statements regarding our market opportunity and market size, and business momentum. Although we attempt to be accurate in making forward-looking statements, it is possible that future circumstances might differ from the assumptions on which such statements are based such that actual results are materially different from our forward-looking statements in this release. Important factors that could cause results to differ materially from the statements herein include the following: general economic risks, including those caused by economic challenges, a possible economic downturn or recession and the effects of inflation or stagflation, rising interest rates or reduced information technology spending; supply chain challenges; negative impacts from the ongoing war in Ukraine and its related macroeconomic effects and our decision to reduce operations in Russia; competitiveness in the security market; the dynamic nature of the security market and its products and services; specific economic risks worldwide and in different geographies, and among different customer segments; uncertainty regarding demand and increased business and renewals from existing customers; sales execution risks, including risks in connection with the timing and completion of large strategic deals; uncertainties around continued success in sales growth and market share gains; uncertainties in market opportunities and the market size; actual or perceived vulnerabilities in our supply chain, products or services, and any actual or perceived breach of our network or our customers’ networks; longer sales cycles, particularly for larger enterprise, service providers, government and other large organization customers; the effectiveness of our salesforce and failure to convert sales pipeline into final sales; risks associated with successful implementation of multiple integrated software products and other product functionality risks; risks associated with integrating acquisitions and changes in circumstances and plans associated therewith, including, among other risks, changes in plans related to product and services integrations, product and services plans and sales strategies; sales and marketing execution risks; execution risks around new product development and introductions and innovation; litigation and disputes and the potential cost, distraction and damage to sales and reputation caused thereby or by other factors; cybersecurity threats, breaches and other disruptions; market acceptance of new products and services; the ability to attract and retain personnel; changes in strategy; risks associated with management of growth; lengthy sales and implementation cycles, particularly in larger organizations; technological changes that make our products and services less competitive, including advances in artificial intelligence; risks associated with the adoption of, and demand for, our products and services in general and by specific customer segments, including those caused by competition and pricing pressure; excess product inventory for any reason, including those caused by the effects of increased inflation and interest rates in certain geographies and the war in Ukraine; risks associated with business disruption caused by natural disasters and health emergencies such as earthquakes, fires, power outages, typhoons, floods, health epidemics and viruses, and by manmade events such as civil unrest, labor disruption, international trade disputes, international conflicts such as the war in Ukraine or tensions between China and Taiwan, terrorism, wars, and critical infrastructure attacks; tariffs, trade disputes and other trade barriers, and negative impact on sales based on geo-political dynamics and disputes and protectionist policies, including the impact of any future shutdowns of the U.S. government; and the other risk factors set forth from time to time in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), copies of which are available free of charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or upon request from our investor relations department. All forward-looking statements herein reflect our opinions only as of the date of this release, and we undertake no obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update forward-looking statements herein in light of new information or future events.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    We have provided in this release financial information that has not been prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). These non-GAAP financial and liquidity measures are not based on any standardized methodology prescribed by GAAP and are not necessarily comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. We use these non-GAAP financial measures internally in analyzing our financial results and believe they are useful to investors, as a supplement to GAAP measures, in evaluating our ongoing operational performance. We believe that the use of these non-GAAP financial measures provides an additional tool for investors to use in evaluating ongoing operating results and trends and in comparing our financial results with peer companies, many of which present similar non-GAAP financial measures to investors.

    Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. Investors are encouraged to review the reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures provided in the financial statement tables below.

    Billings (non-GAAP). We define billings as revenue recognized in accordance with GAAP plus the change in deferred revenue from the beginning to the end of the period less any deferred revenue balances acquired from business combination(s) during the period. We consider billings to be a useful metric for management and investors because billings drive current and future revenue, which is an important indicator of the health and viability of our business and cash flows. There are a number of limitations related to the use of billings instead of GAAP revenue. First, billings include amounts that have not yet been recognized as revenue and are impacted by the term of security and support agreements. Second, we may calculate billings in a manner that is different from peer companies that report similar financial measures. Management accounts for these limitations by providing specific information regarding GAAP revenue and evaluating billings together with GAAP revenue.

    Free cash flow (non-GAAP). We define free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities minus purchases of property and equipment and excluding any significant non-recurring items, such as proceeds from intellectual property matters. We believe free cash flow to be a liquidity measure that provides useful information to management and investors about the amount of cash generated by the business that, after capital expenditures and net of proceeds from intellectual property matters, can be used for strategic opportunities, including repurchasing outstanding common stock, investing in our business, making strategic acquisitions and strengthening the balance sheet. A limitation of using free cash flow rather than the GAAP measures of cash provided by or used in operating activities, investing activities, and financing activities is that free cash flow does not represent the total increase or decrease in the cash and cash equivalents balance for the period because it excludes cash flows from significant non-recurring items, such as proceeds from intellectual property matters, investing activities other than capital expenditures and cash flows from financing activities. Management accounts for this limitation by providing information about our proceeds from intellectual property matters, our capital expenditures and other investing and financing activities on the face of the cash flow statement and under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources” in our most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K and by presenting cash flows from investing and financing activities in our reconciliation of free cash flow. In addition, it is important to note that other companies, including companies in our industry, may not use free cash flow, may calculate free cash flow in a different manner than we do or may use other financial measures to evaluate their performance, all of which could reduce the usefulness of free cash flow as a comparative measure.

    Non-GAAP operating income and operating margin. We define non-GAAP operating income as operating income plus stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, less gain on intellectual property matters and, when applicable, other significant non-recurring items in a given quarter. Non-GAAP operating margin is defined as non-GAAP operating income divided by GAAP revenue. We consider these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors because they exclude the items noted above so that our management and investors can compare our recurring core business operating results over multiple periods. There are a number of limitations related to the use of non-GAAP operating income instead of operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP. First, non-GAAP operating income excludes the items noted above. Second, the components of the costs that we exclude from our calculation of non-GAAP operating income may differ from the components that peer companies exclude when they report their non-GAAP results of operations. Management accounts for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP operating income and evaluating non-GAAP operating income together with operating income calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    Non-GAAP net income and diluted net income per share. We define non-GAAP net income as net income plus the items noted above under non-GAAP operating income and operating margin. In addition, we adjust non-GAAP net income and diluted net income per share for a gain on bargain purchase related to acquisition, a gain from an equity method investment related to acquisition and a tax adjustment required for an effective tax rate on a non-GAAP basis, which differs from the GAAP effective tax rate. We define non-GAAP diluted net income per share as non-GAAP net income divided by the non-GAAP diluted weighted-average shares outstanding. We consider these non-GAAP financial measures to be useful metrics for management and investors for the same reasons that we use non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin. However, in order to provide a more complete picture of our recurring core business operating results, we include in non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted net income per share, the tax adjustment required resulting in an effective tax rate on a non-GAAP basis, which often differs from the GAAP tax rate. We believe the non-GAAP effective tax rates we use are reasonable estimates of normalized tax rates for our current and prior fiscal years under our global operating structure. The same limitations described above regarding our use of non-GAAP operating income and non-GAAP operating margin apply to our use of non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted net income per share. We account for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted net income per share and evaluating non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP diluted net income per share together with net income and diluted net income per share calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    FORTINET, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Unaudited, in millions)
     
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
     
    ASSETS                
    CURRENT ASSETS:                
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,596.6     $ 2,875.9    
    Short-term investments   1,183.9       1,190.6    
    Accounts receivable—net   1,174.0       1,463.4    
    Inventory   362.7       315.5    
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets   125.4       126.1    
       Total current assets   6,442.6       5,971.5    
    LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS   35.2       —    
    PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT—NET   1,403.8       1,349.5    
    DEFERRED CONTRACT COSTS   636.2       622.9    
    DEFERRED TAX ASSETS   1,411.6       1,335.6    
    GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS—NET   357.4       350.4    
    OTHER ASSETS   120.2       133.2    
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 10,407.0     $ 9,763.1    
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                
    CURRENT LIABILITIES:                
    Accounts payable $ 224.5     $ 190.9    
    Accrued liabilities   415.0       337.9    
    Accrued payroll and compensation   250.2       255.7    
    Current portion of long-term debt   498.7       —    
    Deferred revenue   3,339.4       3,276.2    
       Total current liabilities   4,727.8       4,060.7    
    DEFERRED REVENUE   3,079.0       3,084.7    
    LONG-TERM DEBT   496.2       994.3    
    OTHER LIABILITIES   141.1       129.6    
       Total liabilities   8,444.1       8,269.3    
    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES                
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:                
    Common stock   0.8       0.8    
    Additional paid-in capital   1,668.7       1,636.2    
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (22.9 )     (26.1 )  
    Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)   316.3       (117.1 )  
                Total stockholders’ equity   1,962.9       1,493.8    
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 10,407.0     $ 9,763.1    
     
    FORTINET, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (Unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts)
     
      Three Months Ended
     
      March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
     
    REVENUE:                
    Product $ 459.1     $ 408.9    
    Service   1,080.6       944.4    
          Total revenue   1,539.7       1,353.3    
    COST OF REVENUE:                
    Product   149.9       182.8    
    Service   143.2       121.9    
          Total cost of revenue   293.1       304.7    
    GROSS PROFIT:                
    Product   309.2       226.1    
    Service   937.4       822.5    
          Total gross profit   1,246.6       1,048.6    
    OPERATING EXPENSES:                
    Research and development   198.6       173.0    
    Sales and marketing   542.7       501.1    
    General and administrative   57.8       54.4    
    Gain on intellectual property matters   (6.3 )     (1.1 )  
          Total operating expenses   792.8       727.4    
    OPERATING INCOME   453.8       321.2    
    INTEREST INCOME   44.3       32.2    
    INTEREST EXPENSE   (4.9 )     (5.1 )  
    OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)—NET   26.1       (2.9 )  
    INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND GAIN (LOSS) FROM EQUITY METHOD
    INVESTMENTS
      519.3       345.4    
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES   96.5       39.5    
    GAIN (LOSS) FROM EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS   10.6       (6.6 )  
    NET INCOME $ 433.4     $ 299.3    
    Net income per share:                
    Basic $ 0.56     $ 0.39    
    Diluted $ 0.56     $ 0.39    
    Weighted-average shares outstanding:                
    Basic   768.3       762.4    
    Diluted   776.8       770.5    
     
    FORTINET, INC.
    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
    (Unaudited, in millions)
     
      Three Months Ended
     
      March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
     
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                
    Net income $ 433.4     $ 299.3    
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:                
             Stock-based compensation   66.1       62.3    
             Amortization of deferred contract costs   78.0       72.0    
             Depreciation and amortization   35.8       28.6    
             Amortization of investment discounts   (10.3 )     (12.2 )  
             Other   (35.5 )     9.9    
             Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of impact of business combinations:                
                      Accounts receivable—net   303.9       405.6    
                      Inventory   (34.1 )     36.5    
                      Prepaid expenses and other current assets   3.4       (0.1 )  
                      Deferred contract costs   (91.3 )     (66.5 )  
                      Deferred tax assets   (30.0 )     (73.9 )  
                      Other assets   1.5       (6.2 )  
                      Accounts payable   24.6       (61.6 )  
                      Accrued liabilities   63.7       105.0    
                      Accrued payroll and compensation   (8.2 )     (27.4 )  
                      Deferred revenue   57.0       54.8    
                      Other liabilities   5.3       4.3    
                             Net cash provided by operating activities   863.3       830.4    
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                
    Purchases of investments   (503.0 )     (436.1 )  
    Sales of investments   2.8       —    
    Maturities of investments   466.9       393.4    
    Purchases of property and equipment   (66.5 )     (221.9 )  
    Payments made in connection with business combinations, net of cash acquired   (11.2 )     (5.7 )  
    Other   0.2       —    
                             Net cash used in investing activities   (110.8 )     (270.3 )  
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                
    Proceeds from issuance of common stock   20.2       13.4    
    Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards   (52.9 )     (42.9 )  
    Other   —       (0.8 )  
                             Net cash used in financing activities   (32.7 )     (30.3 )  
    EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS   0.9       (1.4 )  
    NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS   720.7       528.4    
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period   2,875.9       1,397.9    
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period $ 3,596.6     $ 1,926.3    
     
    Reconciliations of non-GAAP results of operations measures to the nearest comparable GAAP measures
    (Unaudited, in millions, except per share amounts)
     
    Reconciliation of GAAP operating income to non-GAAP operating income, operating margin, net income and diluted net income per share
     
      Three Months Ended
     
      March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
     
    Reconciliation of non-GAAP operating income:                
    GAAP operating income $ 453.8     $ 321.2    
    GAAP operating margin   29.5 %     23.7 %  
    Add back:                
        Stock‐based compensation   66.9       63.0    
        Amortization of acquired intangible assets   11.8       3.0    
        Gain on intellectual property matters   (6.3 )     (1.1 )  
    Non‐GAAP operating income $ 526.2     $ 386.1    
    Non‐GAAP operating margin   34.2 %     28.5 %  
                     
    Reconciliation of non-GAAP net income:                
    GAAP net income $ 433.4     $ 299.3    
    Add back:                
        Stock‐based compensation   66.9       63.0    
        Amortization of acquired intangible assets   11.8       3.0    
        Gain on intellectual property matters   (6.3 )     (1.1 )  
        Gain on bargain purchase (a)   (39.9 )     —    
        Tax adjustment (b)   (2.8 )     (30.3 )  
        Gain from equity method investment (c)   (10.8 )     —    
    Non-GAAP net income $ 452.3     $ 333.9    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Non-GAAP net income per share, diluted                
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Non-GAAP net income $ 452.3     $ 333.9    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
        Non-GAAP shares used in diluted net income per share calculations   776.8       770.5    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Non-GAAP net income per share, diluted $ 0.58     $ 0.43    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Reconciliation of non-GAAP net income per share, diluted                
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    GAAP net income per share, diluted $ 0.56     $ 0.39    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Add back:                
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
        Non-GAAP adjustments to net income per share   0.02       0.04    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    Non-GAAP net income per share, diluted $ 0.58     $ 0.43    
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
                     
     
    (a) To exclude a $39.9 million gain on bargain purchase related to our acquisition of Linksys Holdings, Inc. (“Linksys”) in the three months ended March 31, 2025.
    (b) Non-GAAP financial information is adjusted to an effective tax rate of 18% and 17% in the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, on a non-GAAP basis, which differs from the GAAP effective tax rate.
    (c) To exclude a $10.8 million gain from equity method investment in Linksys resulted from our acquisition of Linksys in the three months ended March 31, 2025.
     
    Reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities to free cash flow
     
      Three Months Ended
     
      March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
     
    Net cash provided by operating activities $ 863.3     $ 830.4    
    Less: Purchases of property and equipment   (66.5 )     (221.9 )  
    Less: Proceeds from intellectual property matter   (14.0 )     —    
    Free cash flow $ 782.8     $ 608.5    
    Net cash used in investing activities $ (110.8 )   $ (270.3 )  
    Net cash used in financing activities $ (32.7 )   $ (30.3 )  
     
    Reconciliation of total revenue to total billings
     
      Three Months Ended
     
      March 31,
    2025
      March 31,
    2024
     
    Total revenue $ 1,539.7   $ 1,353.3    
    Add: Change in deferred revenue   57.5     54.9    
    Less: Deferred revenue balance acquired in business acquisitions   —     (1.0 )  
    Total billings $ 1,597.2   $ 1,407.2    
     
    Investor Contact: Media Contact:
     
    Aaron Ovadia
    Fortinet, Inc.
    408-235-7700
    investors@fortinet.com
    Michelle Zimmermann
    Fortinet, Inc.
    408-235-7700
    pr@fortinet.com

    The MIL Network –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Rep. Zinke and Vasquez Launch Bipartisan Public Lands Caucus to Champion Conservation and Access

    Source: US Congressman Ryan Zinke (Western Montana)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Representatives Ryan Zinke (R-MT-01) and Gabe Vasquez (D-N.M.-02) announced the launch of the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus, a bipartisan congressional coalition focused on conserving America’s public lands and expanding access for all Americans. The caucus will build upon the trusted working relationship between Vasquez and Zinke, forged over the past two years partnering on conservation legislation, along with the momentum of a new Congress and a new generation of Western lawmakers to bring a new voice to the conversation around public lands.

    The Public Lands Caucus is founded on the belief that public lands are “for the benefit and enjoyment of the people.” It will bring lawmakers from both sides of the aisle to advance practical, consensus-driven public lands policy that conserves natural resources while supporting recreation, local economies, and public access. Caucus members are committed to bridging ideological divides and advancing pragmatic solutions to protect and manage public lands.

     

    “I follow the Theodore Roosevelt motto that public lands are ‘for the benefit and enjoyment of the people,’ and that means making sure we both conserve and manage those lands to ensure public access for the next generation,” said Rep. Ryan Zinke. “Public lands aren’t red or blue issues, it’s red white and blue. The bipartisan Public Lands Caucus brings together lawmakers who don’t agree on much, but we agree on and are ready to work together to promote policies that advance conservation and public access. I look forward to working with Co-Chair Vasquez, the vice chairs, and all the members of this caucus so future generations can enjoy the same opportunities to hunt, hike, fish, make a living and enjoy our uniquely American heritage.”

    “Public lands are where I learned to fish, hunt, and connect with my family and culture—and those experiences shaped who I am,” said Vasquez. “These lands don’t belong to one party or one group of people; they belong to all of us. The Public Lands Caucus is about protecting that birthright—bringing Democrats and Republicans together to preserve access, defend conservation, and invest in the outdoor economy that powers rural communities like mine in southern New Mexico. This is personal for me, and I’m proud to lead this bipartisan effort to keep our public lands in public hands.” 

    “We should be focusing on expanding public access to federal lands, not auctioning them off,” said Rep Dingell. “And we should be investing in our National Parks System and National Wildlife Refuges, not making it harder for Americans to visit these special places. I’m proud to be Vice-Chair of the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus because conservation has historically been, and should continue to be, a priority regardless of party. I look forward to working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to protect our precious natural resources, federal lands, and beloved species.” 

    “Idahoans live in Idaho because we love our public lands,” said Rep. Simpson. “This trend is common across the West, where public lands are a part of our daily lives. As a lifelong Idahoan and Chairman of the House Interior and Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, I remain committed to preserving access to our public lands and defending our way of life. Being named Vice Chair of the Public Lands Caucus is an honor, and I look forward to working with my colleagues to ensure future generations can enjoy the same benefits that we do today. I’m thankful to Rep. Zinke for his leadership here.”

    “As someone born and raised in the Coachella Valley, I know how sacred our public lands are. Places like Joshua Tree and the new Chuckwalla National Monument are more than landscapes—they’re part of our identity, history, and culture,” said Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-CA-25) Conserving public lands means protecting cultural heritage, preserving critical ecosystems, and expanding access to nature’s healing power, especially for underserved communities. I’ll continue fighting to ensure every family—no matter where they live—can experience the beauty, health, and enjoyment that public lands offer.”

    “Public land access is integral to Montana,” said Congressman Troy Downing (MT-02). “Montanans rely on the Treasure State’s more than 30 million acres of public lands to hunt, fish, recreate, graze their livestock, and so much more. I applaud Co-Chairs Zinke and Vasquez for their efforts and look forward to working with my colleagues to find common sense solutions that preserve my constituents’ access to this fundamentally American resource.”

    “As a representative of Coastal Virginia, I know how vital our public lands and waters are to our economy, our culture, and our quality of life – from supporting tourism and outdoor recreation to sustaining jobs and protecting natural habitats,” said Congresswoman Kiggans. “I’m proud to join the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus to bring a balanced, commonsense approach to protecting these resources. From our shorelines to our forests, we must ensure that future generations can enjoy and benefit from healthy and accessible public lands across the country for years to come.”

     “Having served as Chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus for four years, I understand firsthand the importance of common-sense conservation policies that protect our precious lands while guaranteeing public access,” said Congressman Newhouse. “The bipartisan Public Lands Caucus will elevate practical land management policies that support our shared commitment to unlocking our natural resources, boosting surrounding local economies, and supporting safe recreation for all to enjoy. I thank Reps. Zinke and Vasquez for their leadership, and I look forward to working closely with the caucus this Congress.”

     

    Caucus Leadership

    Co-Chairs

    • Rep. Gabe Vasquez (D-NM-02)
    • Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-01) 

    Vice Chairs

    • Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI-06)
    • Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID-02)

    Members Include

    • Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-CA-25)
    • Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC-11)
    • Rep. Joe Neguse (D-CO-02)
    • Rep. Jen Kiggan (R-VA-02)
    • Rep. Emily Randall (D-WA-06)
    • Rep. Troy Downing (R-MT-01)
    • Rep. Steven Horsford (D-NV-04)
    • Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-WA-04)
    • Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV-03)
    • Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ-06)

     

    Organizational Support

    “Public lands are the backyard of the little guy, demonstrating our commitment to leaving the world a better place for our children than the one we inherited from our parents,” said Chris Wood, President and CEO of Trout Unlimited. “On behalf of Trout Unlimited members across the nation, I thank Congressmen Zinke and Vasquez and the members of the newly minted bipartisan Public Lands Caucus for their leadership upholding our legacy of public lands. Preventing large-scale transfer or sale of federal public lands helps to maintain access to some of the best places to fish and hunt on the planet. We look forward to working with the caucus to keep it that way.” 

    “On both sides of the aisle, Americans cherish our public lands,” said Joel Pedersen, president and CEO of the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “From the Northern Rockies of Montana to the Gila Mountains of New Mexico, these lands and waters provide invaluable opportunities to millions of hunters and anglers. We join our nation’s sportsmen and women in thanking Representatives Zinke and Vasquez for their leadership in forming the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus which will continue to advance America’s outdoor legacy.”

    Whitney Potter Schwartz, Senior Vice President, Outdoor Recreation Roundtable: “The creation of the Public Lands Caucus is a significant and welcome step forward in protecting and expanding access to our public lands and waters that power America’s $1.2 trillion outdoor recreation economy and enrich the lives of millions of Americans. Keeping public lands public is a business imperative. There couldn’t be a more important time to stand up for America’s best return on investment and keep public land selloff out of reconciliation. ORR thanks Representatives Gabe Vasquez and Ryan Zinke for their leadership and all the bipartisan members of the Caucus who have come together to champion public lands access, stewardship, and infrastructure investments. We look forward to working with the Caucus to ensure that public lands remain public and continue to be a foundation for outdoor experiences, local economies, and healthy communities for generations to come.” 

    “Public lands are essential to the emotional and economic well-being of our nation,” said Phil Ingrassia, President of the national RV Dealers Association. “RVDA applauds the creation of the Public Lands Caucus and its commitment to enhancing access and expanding the infrastructure that supports millions of Americans who enjoy these shared spaces.” 

    “America Outdoors applauds Representatives Vasquez and Zinke for their leadership in launching the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus,” said Caryn Short, America Outdoors. “Continued access to our public lands is vital to the health of the outfitting industry, rural economies, and the millions of Americans who rely on these landscapes for connection, livelihood, and adventure.” 

    Public lands are part of the shared national identify of Americans,” said Rachel Franchina, Executive Director, Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals. “They are treasured places – both close to home and in iconic protected areas – for people to spend time with family and friends, recharge themselves and reconnect with nature. The Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals supports Representatives Ryan Zinke (R-MT) and Gabe Vasquez (D-NM)’s Bipartisan Public Lands Caucus. High-quality experiences on public lands are something the vast majority of American value and their commitment to ensuring access to our shared heritage is more important now than ever.” 

    “Public lands make hunting, fishing, and other outdoor recreation activities accessible for millions of Americans,” said Kellis Moss, Managing Director of Federal Affairs for Ducks Unlimited. “Some of our most critical conservation programs, such as NAWCA, invest in habitat on public lands. We’re glad to see Congress prioritize conserving America’s natural places for the next generation of outdoorsmen and women, and we’re happy to support the Public Lands Caucus in this effort.”

    “The NWTF extends deep gratitude to Congressmen Vasquez and Zinke for their leadership in founding the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus,” said Jason Burckhalter, Co-CEO, National Wild Turkey Federation. “This crucial effort bolsters the unique American public trust, ensuring our public lands—vital habitats for wildlife, cornerstones of our hunting heritage, and cherished spaces for outdoor recreation—remain a shared resource, held in trust for all citizens, preserving their accessibility and stewardship for future generations.”

    “America’s upland hunters and grassland advocates applaud today’s launch of the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus,” said Ariel Wiegard, Vice President of Government Affairs, Pheasants Forever and Quail Forever. “We stand ready to work with Reps. Vasquez, Zinke, and the other Caucus members to advance public land conservation policies, increase and improve habitat and access, and energize and engage the upland conservation community. America’s grassland and sagebrush shrub-steppe ecosystems are among the most at-risk environments in the world. We are confident this Caucus will help ensure our treasured public lands deliver the promise of more wildlife and more hunters, alongside other natural resource and quality of life benefits, to the American people.”

    “Backcountry Hunters & Anglers strongly supports the creation of the Public Lands Caucus and thanks Representatives Vasquez and Zinke for bringing together a bipartisan force to defend against ongoing threats to sell or transfer our wild public lands,” said Devin O’Dea, Western Policy & Conservation Manager, Backcountry Hunters & Anglers. “Our public lands define who we are as Americans — places where anyone, regardless of background, can hunt, fish, camp or explore. The Public Lands Caucus is a crucial step in ensuring our wild public lands, waters, and wildlife endure.”

    “According to the American Horse Council’s latest economic impact study, 39 million U.S. households include a horse enthusiast, with recreational trail riders representing the largest segment of the equine industry — underscoring the critical need for access to public lands,” said Julie M. Broadway, President, American Horse Council & American Horse Council Foundation. “Conserving public lands, supporting local economies, and ensuring access for all Americans is essential to the equine community, and we strongly applaud the creation of this congressional caucus as a step toward protecting these shared resources.”

    “The Western Landowners Alliance applauds the formation of the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus to protect our public lands and thanks Representatives Vasquez and Zinke for their leadership on this issue,” said Lesli Allison, Chief Executive Officer, Western Landowners Alliance. “Care for our public lands is a priority across party lines and fence lines in the West. Western Landowners Alliance members steward tens of millions of acres of private and public land, and recognize the challenges facing federal land management and budgets. We are also acutely aware of the nation’s real housing deficit. But disposal of federal land is not a practical solution to either problem.”

    “Public lands are the source of clean drinking water for millions of Americans,” said Tom Kiernan, CEO, American Rivers. “The rivers that flow across our national parks, forests, and rangelands provide recreation and awesome scenic beauty to our country. We are excited to continue working with Congress to support the protection of these lands and rivers on behalf of all Americans. Thank you to Representatives Vasquez and Zinke for launching this caucus.”

    Watch the full launch event here.

    Access photos from the event here.

    ###

     

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Steering through the Fog: The Art and Science of Monetary Policy in Emerging Markets

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    (As prepared for delivery)

    May 7, 2025

    Good afternoon. It is a pleasure to be with you here at this critical juncture for the global economy. Since early April, the US effective tariff rate has increased to levels last seen over a hundred years ago, and the uncertainty surrounding trade policy and geopolitics has surged.

    The economic effects of these developments are expected to be sizeable. Our World Economic Outlook ‘reference scenario’ projects that tariffs will reduce both global and emerging market (EM) output growth by roughly 0.5 percentage points relative to our forecast prior to the April tariffs. Countries imposing high tariffs, or those that are heavily dependent on trade with those countries, will be hit the hardest. But no country is likely to emerge unscathed: we have downgraded our forecasts for 127 countries that account for 86 percent of global GDP.

    The impact on inflation is more varied. For countries facing higher tariffs on their exports, the tariffs are expected to mainly operate as a negative demand shock and exert mild downward pressure on inflation.  For countries imposing much higher tariffs, notably the United States, the tariffs will likely act more as an adverse supply shock, boosting inflation while lowering growth.

    There are several reasons why economic outcomes could be much worse than our WEO reference scenario. As of now financial conditions have not tightened much, including in emerging markets, and many EM currencies have remained surprisingly resilient against the dollar. If, however, trade policy discussions do not yield lower tariffs soon, financial conditions could tighten abruptly, with major effects on capital flows to EMs.  Knightian uncertainty abounds as the global economic order transforms. How should central banks in emerging markets steer through this fog? I will address this question in today’s lecture.

     

    EM central banks have developed much stronger monetary policy frameworks since the late 1990s, often in the context of adopting inflation targeting. They have benefited from major improvements in governance, with clear mandates focused on price stability.  Their operational independence has also increased substantially — both de jure and de facto — and they have strengthened their public accountability, as well as transparency. These advancements were invaluable in helping them respond quickly both to COVID and to the subsequent inflation surge, raising interest rates sharply in the latter case to contain inflation and keep inflation expectations anchored.

    Even so, significant differences remain between EMs and AEs, especially regarding the strength of the exchange rate channel and the degree to which global factors influence monetary transmission. Several features deserve particular attention: 

    Transmission of policy actions and shocks differs in EMs

    First, monetary policy transmission appears noticeably weaker in EMs than in AEs, and dependent both on global financial conditions and on the reliance of EM banks on external financing. In advanced economies, an easing of policy rates quickly translates into lower market rates — which is what matters for the borrowing decisions of households and firms — and this boosts the economy.

    By contrast, my research with Sebnem Kalemli-Özcan and Pierre De Leo (De Leo, Gopinath and Kalemli-Özcan, 2024) shows that when EM central banks loosen policy, the transmission to short-term market rates depends critically on what happens to global financial conditions. If global financial conditions tighten enough – as often follows a surprise tightening in US monetary policy – then domestic market rates may even rise when the EM central bank lowers policy rates.  The implicit rise in the risk spread facing borrowers clearly blunts the effectiveness of monetary policy and makes it harder for EMs to cushion the effects of shocks. This is particularly relevant at the current juncture where trade shocks could play out as negative demand shocks in many EMs, calling for looser monetary policy. At the same time, they could play out as negative supply shocks in the US and call for tighter US monetary policy.

    The changing mix of EM external financing also raises new vulnerabilities. EMs have become more dependent on external financing from foreign nonbank financial institutions, including insurance companies and investment funds, with their share of external portfolio financing growing to about 40 percent. While nonbanks help diversify emerging market funding sources and reduce borrowing costs, these types of capital flows are also very sensitive to the global financial cycle.[1] At times of financial stress, investment funds—such as exchange traded funds and open-end mutual funds in particular—are more susceptible to investors withdrawing their money, which in turn causes investment funds to withdraw from the riskiest markets.  Consequently, the volume and speed of exit of capital flows have increased over time, as was evident at the start of Covid-19.

    This sensitivity of EMs to global stress may also increase given that crypto assets are playing a larger role in cross-border financial intermediation and payments, often spurred by the desire to achieve cost-efficiencies, but also to circumvent capital flow restrictions in some cases.  In most EMs, crypto asset use doesn’t yet appear high enough to present imminent systemic risks.  Even so, crypto assets are growing rapidly in many EMs, and overall usage has become a noticeable share of GDP in some EMs with high inflation and lower macroeconomic stability. For example, Cerutti, Chen and Hengge (2024) find that several EMs in Latin America and Eastern Europe fall in the upper quartile of countries in terms of the magnitude of their bitcoin inflows as a share of GDP, with monthly inflows in the range of 0.1 to 0.8% of GDP. Focusing on a wider set of crypto assets, Cardozo, Fernández, Jiang and Rojas (2024) find that cross-border crypto outflows have reached as much as a quarter of gross portfolio outflows in Brazil.

    Use of crypto requires a careful understanding of the risks.  Crypto may increase capital flow volatility and exacerbate financial stress, including by allowing investors to easily shift their deposits out of domestic banks into foreign exchange-denominated stablecoins.  If crypto flows grow large enough, such disintermediation from the banking system and associated capital outflows could cause financial conditions to tighten and the exchange rate to weaken, and potentially spur a significant economic downturn.

    Weaker policy credibility complicates monetary policy trade-offs

    A second difference between AEs and EMs is the relatively weaker credibility of EM monetary policy to deliver low inflation. While EMs have improved their frameworks substantially, inflation expectations still tend to be less well-anchored than in AEs. Consequently, there is a higher passthrough of cost shocks to inflation, as they feed through much more into inflation expectations as well as through other channels such as wage indexation.  Oil price shocks tend to impact core inflation more than twice as strongly in a sample of emerging market economies, relative to advanced ones.[2] This high passthrough makes dealing with external shocks particularly difficult for EM central banks, as second-round effects could be sizeable, including from ongoing shocks to trade policy that could disrupt supply chains and raise input costs.

    Inflation expectations also tend to be more sensitive to fiscal policy and debt in EMs. This likely reflects increased risks of fiscal dominance and political interference in central bank decisions, which can undermine the public’s confidence in the central bank’s ability to fight inflation. A surprise increase in government debt tends to boost medium-term expected inflation in EMs significantly, while having little effect in advanced economies.[3]

     

    Exchange rates have a much larger imprint on price and financial stability

    A third critical distinction between EMs and AEs is that the exchange rate has a much larger imprint on price and financial stability in EMs.  While passthrough of exchange rate changes to inflation has declined considerably for many EMs, it remains significantly higher than in advanced economies. A 10 percent depreciation of EM currencies against the dollar causes EM price levels to rise by about 2 percent, several times larger than in advanced economies.[4]

    The presence of foreign exchange mismatches increases the financial stability risks from exchange rate depreciation. While many EMs have reduced FX mismatches – or lowered the risk through the development of derivatives markets that allow for better hedging — reliance on dollar funding within the financial system remains an important source of fragility for some EMs. This weakens monetary transmission, as lowering interest rates causes the balance sheets of corporates with unhedged FX liabilities to deteriorate and financial conditions to tighten, which offsets some of the stimulus from easing. EMs that have shifted to relying more on local currency financing also can experience sharp increases in currency premia and local borrowing costs when foreign investors exit these shallow markets. This makes it harder for EMs to deal with an environment of bigger external shocks: even if a tariff abroad would look like a demand shock from the standpoint of an AE economy, the exchange rate depreciation it induces raises risk spreads and makes it harder for the EM central bank to cushion the impact on the economy. 

    Steering through the fog: How should policy respond?

    Having outlined some of the unique challenges emerging market central banks face in the current global context, I will next lay out some broad principles that can help steer through the fog. EMs clearly will differ in how they respond to the shocks and the uncertainty depending on their cyclical conditions and on structural features such as the extent of their exposure to trade and financial disruptions.

    This said, and despite the fog, EM central banks should respond forcefully to upside inflation risks if they materialize to ensure that high inflation does not get embedded into inflation expectations. While I’ve noted that we see the current configuration of tariffs as likely to be slightly disinflationary for many EMs in our reference scenario, there is a significant risk that inflationary pressures could emerge — from supply chain disruptions and higher input cost pressures in a fragmenting world or from exchange rate depreciations. 

    Given the high passthrough of both exchange rate changes and cost shocks to inflation in EMs, a major risk is large and persistent second round effects, especially if inflation has been running persistently above target and the fiscal position is weak. History has shown that once inflation becomes embedded in expectations—often through wage and price indexation mechanisms—it becomes significantly more difficult to reverse. If the risk materializes, timely and firm action is critical to keep inflation expectations anchored and reassure the public of the central bank’s unwavering commitment to sound monetary policy and price stability.

    Foreign exchange intervention should be used prudently

    Second, in a more turbulent external environment, foreign exchange intervention (FXI) can help address disorderly market conditions that undermine financial stability. The Fund’s Integrated Policy Framework is helpful in identifying conditions when it may be possible to improve tradeoffs facing central banks using FXI and other tools (IMF, 2023; Basu, Boz, Gopinath, Roch and Unsal, 2023).

    Notably, central banks can reduce exchange rate pressures by selling FX during episodes of capital flight when FX markets are shallow, allowing central banks not to have to hike policy rates sharply. This can improve macroeconomic outcomes as well as lower financial stability risks.

    However, it is important that FXI is not used to reduce exchange rate volatility per se, or to target a particular level of the exchange rate, as such misuse could easily weaken confidence in the central bank’s commitment to stabilizing inflation.  Moreover, given the finite level of reserves, the bar for FXI should be high to ensure that FX liquidity can be provided when it is really needed. As of now financial conditions have tightened in an orderly manner, which means that when it comes to FXI the advice is to keep the powder dry.

    Build financial and fiscal resilience

    Third, efforts to build financial resilience through strengthening prudential policies are also desirable. As I have emphasized, EM financial systems remain quite exposed to geopolitical shocks and face growing risks from heightened external finance from foreign nonbanks and potentially crypto. Prudential policies can help them build adequate buffers as well as reduce vulnerabilities arising from high leverage, volatile capital flows, and FX mismatches. On the crypto side, it will be important to develop comprehensive legal, regulatory and supervisory frameworks for crypto assets, including through cooperative global efforts given their cross-border nature (IMF, 2023b).  The authorities should also ensure that capital flow management measures, when appropriate, remain effective and not undermined by the use of crypto.  And EMs should continue to strengthen macroeconomic frameworks to reduce the risk of currency and asset substitution into crypto assets (often called “cryptoization”).

    Fiscal policy also plays a critical role in helping ensure macroeconomic stability. Uncertainty shocks have much bigger effects on sovereign spreads when EM debt servicing costs are relatively high. Ensuring that tax and spending policies adjust to keep debt on a sustainable path helps provide buffers to respond to downturns and lowers financial stability risks.

    Improve central bank communication, governance, and policy strategy

    Lastly, there is a high premium on further strengthening policy frameworks to continue building resilience in a more shock-prone environment. 

    Clarity of communication has become more critical than ever. Effective communication about the central bank’s reaction function –in qualitative terms – is likely to be useful in helping better anchor inflation expectations and thus improve tradeoffs.

    Improved governance – including to strengthen central bank independence – can increase public confidence that the central bank will have latitude to achieve its objectives. Central banks will inevitably make mistakes—no forecast is perfect. But what must be clear is that any deviation from target is the result of uncertainty, not political interference.

    EM central banks, as for their AE counterparts, must also adapt their policy strategies to focus more on the distribution of outcomes rather than the modal outlook, and to take more account of risk management considerations. Monetary policy must navigate a world shaped by a multiplicity of shocks—some persistent, some temporary, and some with offsetting effects on inflation where it is difficult to assess the net impact.

    Accordingly, many central banks should continue to take steps to revise their frameworks to move away from excessive reliance on central forecasts. This can be facilitated by increasing use of scenario analysis in decision-making.

    Conclusion

    To conclude, EMs have made major strides in improving their monetary policy frameworks, and this has enabled several of them to respond effectively to unprecedented shocks like the pandemic. They are now being tested again as the global economic order is reset and Knightian uncertainty prevails. This uncertainty does not, however, imply gradualism in all matters. If inflation pressures rise, EM central banks will need to respond quickly using policy rates to prevent higher inflation from getting entrenched as they did during COVID. We must recognize that the road ahead may have many unforeseen turns, which calls for further strengthening financial and fiscal resilience and navigating with monetary policy clarity, credibility, and discipline.

    References

    Baba, C., and J. Lee. 2022. “Second-round effects of oil price shocks – implications for Europe’s inflation outlook”. IMF Working Paper no. 2022/173.

    Basu, S.S., Boz, E., Gopinath, G., Roch, F., and F.D. Unsal. 2023. “Integrated monetary and financial policies for small open economies”. IMF Working Paper no. 2023/161.

    Brandão-Marques, L., Casiraghi, M., Gelos, G., Harrison, O., and G. Kamber. 2024. “Is high debt constraining monetary policy? Evidence from inflation expectations”. Journal of International Money and Finance 149(C).

    Brandão-Marques, L., Górnicka, L., and G. Kamber. 2023. “Exchange rate fluctuations in advanced and emerging economies: Same shocks, different outcomes”, in Shocks and Capital Flows, edited by Gaston Gelos and Ratna Sahay, IMF.

    Cardozo, P., Fernández, A., Jiang, J., and F.D. Rojas. 2024. “On cross-border crypto flows: Measurement, drivers, and policy implications“. IMF Working Paper no. 2024/261.

    Cerutti, E.M., Chen, J., and M. Hengge. 2024. “A primer on Bitcoin cross-border flows: Measurement and drivers“. IMF Working Paper no. 2024/85.

    Chari, A. 2023. “Global risk, non-bank financial intermediation, and emerging market vulnerabilities”. Annual Review of Economics 15: 549-572.

    De Leo, P., Gopinath, G., and S. Kalemli-Özcan. 2024. “Monetary policy and the short-rate disconnect in emerging economies”. NBER Working Paper no. 30458.

    IMF. 2023. “Integrated Policy Framework – Principles for use of foreign exchange interventions”. IMF Policy Paper no. 2023/061.

    IMF. 2023b. “Elements of effective policies for crypto assets”. IMF Policy Paper no. 2023/004.

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/05/07/sp050725-science-of-monetary-policy-in-emerging-markets-gita-gopinath

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: AG Labrador Announces Victory in Lawsuit Opposing California’s Electric-Truck Mandates

    Source: US State of Idaho

    Home Newsroom AG Labrador Announces Victory in Lawsuit Opposing California’s Electric-Truck Mandates

    BOISE – Attorney General Raúl Labrador announced today that California has agreed to repeal its electric-truck mandates that reach well beyond California’s borders. Nebraska led a coalition of 17 states and the Nebraska Trucking Association in challenging a suite of California regulations called Advanced Clean Fleets in the Eastern District of California. Among other things, Advanced Clean Fleets would have required certain trucking companies to retire internal-combustion trucks and transition to more expensive and less efficient electric trucks. The rule targeted any fleet that operated in California regardless of where the fleet is headquartered. Given California’s large population and access to international ports, this rule would have had nationwide effects on the supply chain. In the settlement announced today, however, California has agreed not to enforce the rule and to outright repeal it.
    “California’s attempt to dictate trucking standards for the entire country was a blatant overreach that would have devastated industries far beyond its borders,” Attorney General Labrador said. “This is a win for Idaho’s truckers and for the families and businesses who rely on them. Our truckers should not be forced to comply with mandates dreamt up by regulators in Sacramento. I’m proud to have joined this successful coalition, and I will continue fighting for policies that protect Idaho’s economy and constitutional rights.” 
    As part of the settlement, California regulators pledged to commence rulemaking proceedings to formally scrub the rule from the books. California regulators also conceded that they cannot enforce California’s 2036 ban on the sale of internal-combustion trucks unless and until the ban receives a Clean Air Act preemption waiver from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Previously, Attorney General Labrador joined a 24-state coalition led by Nebraska in successfully opposing California’s request for a waiver. In addition to Attorney General Labrador, attorneys general from the following states joined the lawsuit against California regulators: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Utah, West Virginia, and Wyoming. Also joining the lawsuit were the Nebraska Trucking Association and the Arizona State Legislature.
    Read the settlement here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cassidy, Rosen Introduce Legislation to Protect Sensitive Federal Data from DeepSeek, Adversarial AI Technologies

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) and Jacky Rosen (D-NV) introduced the Protection Against Foreign Adversarial Artificial Intelligence Act of 2025 to prohibit federal contractors from using DeepSeek, an artificial intelligence (AI) platform with direct ties to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), to fulfill contracts with federal agencies. DeepSeek poses a significant potential national security threat and is required by Chinese law to share the data it collects with the government of the People’s Republic of China and its intelligence agencies. Several U.S. states and allied nations have already moved to block DeepSeek from government devices due to critical security concerns.
    “AI is a powerful tool which can be used to enhance things like medicine and education. But in the wrong hands, it can be weaponized. By feeding sensitive data into systems like DeepSeek, we give China another weapon,” said Dr. Cassidy.
    “The U.S. must take steps to ensure Americans’ data and our government systems are protected against cyber threats from foreign adversaries,” said Senator Rosen. “This bipartisan legislation would prevent federal contractors from using Deepseek, a CCP-linked AI platform, when carrying out government work. I will continue working across party lines to bolster our national security and protect Americans’ data.”
    Specifically, the Protection Against Foreign Adversarial Artificial Intelligence Act of 2025 would:
    Prohibit federal contractors with an active federal contract from using DeepSeek, and any successor application developed by High-Flyer, for the fulfillment, assistance, execution, or otherwise support to complete, or support in part, a contract with an agency of the U.S. federal government. 
    Allow the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the U.S. Secretary of Defense, may provide a waiver, if necessary, on a case-by-case basis for national security-related or research purposes.
    Include a report to Congress from the U.S. Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the U.S. Secretary of Defense, on the national security and economic espionage threats posed by AI platforms from adversarial nations, such as China, North Korea, Iran, and Russia.
    Background
    Cassidy has been a consistent champion for online privacy and user data protection. Earlier this year, he introduced legislation to protect U.S. servicemembers’ data from adversarial nations like China and has worked to ensure that Americans can delete their personal data collected by private data broker companies.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Reps. Vasquez and Zinke Launch Bipartisan Public Lands Caucus to Champion Conservation and Access

    Source: US Representative Gabe Vasquez’s (NM-02)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Representatives Gabe Vasquez (D-NM-02) and Ryan Zinke (R-MT-01) announced the launch of the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus, a bipartisan congressional coalition focused on conserving America’s public lands and expanding access for all Americans. The caucus will build upon the trusted working relationship between Vasquez and Zinke, forged over the past two years, partnering on conservation legislation, along with the momentum of a new Congress and a new generation of Western lawmakers to bring a new voice to the conversation around public lands.

     

    The Public Lands Caucus is founded on the belief that public lands are “for the benefit and enjoyment of the people.” It will bring lawmakers from both sides of the aisle to advance practical, consensus-driven public lands policy that conserves natural resources while supporting recreation, local economies, and public access. Caucus members are committed to bridging ideological divides and advancing pragmatic solutions to protect and manage public lands.

     

    WATCH: Public Lands Caucus Press Conference

     

    “Public lands are where I learned to fish, hunt, and connect with my family and culture—and those experiences shaped who I am,” said Rep. Gabe Vasquez (D-NM-02). “These lands don’t belong to one party or one group of people; they belong to all of us. The Public Lands Caucus is about protecting that birthright—bringing Democrats and Republicans together to preserve access, defend conservation, and invest in the outdoor economy that powers rural communities like mine in southern New Mexico. This is personal for me, and I’m proud to lead this bipartisan effort to keep our public lands in public hands.”

     

    “I follow the Theodore Roosevelt motto that public lands are ‘for the benefit and enjoyment of the people,’ and that means making sure we both conserve and manage those lands to ensure public access for the next generation,” said Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-02). “Public lands aren’t red or blue issues, it’s red white and blue. The bipartisan Public Lands Caucus brings together lawmakers who don’t agree on much, but we agree on and are ready to work together to promote policies that advance conservation and public access. I look forward to working with Co-Chair Vasquez, the vice chairs, and all the members of this caucus so future generations can enjoy the same opportunities to hunt, hike, fish, make a living and enjoy our uniquely American heritage.”

     

    “We should be focusing on expanding public access to federal lands, not auctioning them off. And we should be investing in our National Parks System and National Wildlife Refuges, not making it harder for Americans to visit these special places,” said Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI-06). I’m proud to be Vice-Chair of the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus because conservation has historically been, and should continue to be, a priority regardless of party. I look forward to working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to protect our precious natural resources, federal lands, and beloved species.” 

     

    “Idahoans live in Idaho because we love our public lands,” said Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID-02). “This trend is common across the West, where public lands are a part of our daily lives. As a lifelong Idahoan and Chairman of the House Interior and Environment Appropriations Subcommittee, I remain committed to preserving access to our public lands and defending our way of life. Being named Vice Chair of the Public Lands Caucus is an honor, and I look forward to working with my colleagues to ensure future generations can enjoy the same benefits that we do today. I’m thankful to Rep. Zinke for his leadership here.”

     

    “As someone born and raised in the Coachella Valley, I know how sacred our public lands are. Places like Joshua Tree and the new Chuckwalla National Monument are more than landscapes—they’re part of our identity, history, and culture,” said Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-CA-25) Conserving public lands means protecting cultural heritage, preserving critical ecosystems, and expanding access to nature’s healing power, especially for underserved communities. I’ll continue fighting to ensure every family—no matter where they live—can experience the beauty, health, and enjoyment that public lands offer.”

     

    “Public land access is integral to Montana,” said Rep. Troy Downing (R-MT-02). “Montanans rely on the Treasure State’s more than 30 million acres of public lands to hunt, fish, recreate, graze their livestock, and so much more. I applaud Co-Chairs Zinke and Vasquez for their efforts and look forward to working with my colleagues to find common sense solutions that preserve my constituents’ access to this fundamentally American resource.”

     

    “As a representative of Coastal Virginia, I know how vital our public lands and waters are to our economy, our culture, and our quality of life – from supporting tourism and outdoor recreation to sustaining jobs and protecting natural habitats,” said Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-VA-02). “I’m proud to join the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus to bring a balanced, commonsense approach to protecting these resources. From our shorelines to our forests, we must ensure that future generations can enjoy and benefit from healthy and accessible public lands across the country for years to come.”

     

    Caucus Leadership

    Co-Chairs

    • Rep. Gabe Vasquez (D-NM-02)
    • Rep. Ryan Zinke (R-MT-01)

     

    Vice Chairs

    • Rep. Debbie Dingell (D-MI-06)
    • Rep. Mike Simpson (R-ID-02)

     

    Members Include

    • Rep. Raul Ruiz (D-CA-25)
    • Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-NC-11)
    • Rep Joe Neguse (D-CO-02)
    • Rep. Jen Kiggans (R-VA-02)
    • Rep. Emily Randall (D-WA-06)
    • Rep. Troy Downing (R-MT-01)
    • Rep. Steven Horsford (D-NV-04)
    • Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-WA-04)
    • Rep. Susie Lee (D-NV-03)
    • Rep. Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ-06)

     

    Organizational Support

     

    “On both sides of the aisle, Americans cherish our public lands,” said Joel Pedersen, president and CEO of the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership. “From the Northern Rockies of Montana to the Gila Mountains of New Mexico, these lands and waters provide invaluable opportunities to millions of hunters and anglers. We join our nation’s sportsmen and women in thanking Representatives Zinke and Vasquez for their leadership in forming the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus which will continue to advance America’s outdoor legacy.”

     

    Whitney Potter Schwartz, Senior Vice President, Outdoor Recreation Roundtable: “The creation of the Public Lands Caucus is a significant and welcome step forward in protecting and expanding access to our public lands and waters that power America’s $1.2 trillion outdoor recreation economy and enrich the lives of millions of Americans. Keeping public lands public is a business imperative. There couldn’t be a more important time to stand up for America’s best return on investment and keep public land selloff out of reconciliation. ORR thanks Representatives Gabe Vasquez and Ryan Zinke for their leadership and all the bipartisan members of the Caucus who have come together to champion public lands access, stewardship, and infrastructure investments. We look forward to working with the Caucus to ensure that public lands remain public and continue to be a foundation for outdoor experiences, local economies, and healthy communities for generations to come.” 

     

    Phil Ingrassia, President of the national RV Dealers Association (RVDA): “Public lands are essential to the emotional and economic well-being of our nation. RVDA applauds the creation of the Public Lands Caucus and its commitment to enhancing access and expanding the infrastructure that supports millions of Americans who enjoy these shared spaces.” 

     

    Julie Sutton, Senior Director Government Affairs, VF Corporation: VF Corporationand our portfolio of iconic outdoor brands applaud Representatives Ryan Zinke (R-MT) and Gabe Vasquez (D-NM) for their bipartisan leadership in establishing the Public Lands Caucus. This caucus has an opportunity to improve management of public lands, protect and conserve our natural resources and maintain access for everyone to enjoy the outdoors. We thank you for your commitment to our public lands. 

     

    Myke Bybee, Senior Director of Federal Relations, Trust for Public Land: “Trust for Public Land strongly commends Representatives Ryan Zinke (R-MT) and Gabe Vasquez (D-NM) for their bipartisan leadership in launching the Public Lands Caucus and introducing legislation — The Public Lands in Public Hands Act — which affirms the importance of our shared national landscapes. With Congress and the Administration considering proposals to sell off federal land, and as Americans visit public lands in record numbers—to hike, hunt, and connect with nature—their leadership could not come at a more critical time.” 

     

    Jenn Dice, President & CEO, PeopleForBikes: “Public lands are an important part of the American experience and critical to the outdoor recreation economy, including the bicycle industry. We applaud the leaders of the Public Lands Caucus who are committed to protecting, managing, and staffing our most treasured natural spaces that are a source of our national pride.” 

     

    Caryn Short, America Outdoors: “America Outdoors applauds Representatives Vasquez and Zinke for their leadership in launching the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus. Continued access to our public lands is vital to the health of the outfitting industry, rural economies, and the millions of Americans who rely on these landscapes for connection, livelihood, and adventure.” 

     

    Rachel Franchina, Executive Director, Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals: “Public lands are part of the shared national identify of Americans. They are treasured places – both close to home and in iconic protected areas – for people to spend time with family and friends, recharge themselves and reconnect with nature. The Society of Outdoor Recreation Professionals supports Representatives Ryan Zinke (R-MT) and Gabe Vasquez (D-NM)’s Bipartisan Public Lands Caucus. High-quality experiences on public lands are something the vast majority of American value and their commitment to ensuring access to our shared heritage is more important now than ever.” 

     

    Mary Ellen Sprenkel, President & CEO, The Corps Network: “Americans love our public lands. Hundreds of millions of people visit our national parks, forests, and grasslands every year, helping drive local economies. The Corps Network proudly represents 150 Corps programs across the country that work with resource management agencies on critical maintenance projects that keep our public lands safe and open for all to enjoy. Through service on public lands, thousands of Corps participants every year gain invaluable work experience for the modern workforce. We appreciate the goal of the Public Lands Caucus to ensure Americans have access to the Great Outdoors.” 

     

    Julie M. Broadway, President, American Horse Council & American Horse Council Foundation: “According to American Horse Council’s latest economic impact study, 39 million U.S. households include a horse enthusiast, with recreational trail riders representing the largest segment of the equine industry — underscoring the critical need for access to public lands. Federal data supports this: the Bureau of Land Management estimates three million annual horseback riding visitors, along with 46,000 participating in pack use; the U.S. Forest Service cites 206,000 horseback riders, and the National Park Service reports 1.6 million. Conserving public lands, supporting local economies, and ensuring access for all Americans is essential to the equine community, and we strongly applaud the creation of this congressional caucus as a step toward protecting these shared resources.” 

     

    Dan Mahoney, Government Affairs Manager, American Prairie: “American Prairie applauds Representatives Ryan Zinke and Gabe Vasquez for launching this bipartisan caucus to protect our country’s public lands. These lands are a cherished piece of America’s heritage, and one that American Prairie is committed to conserving and expanding access to in Montana. This new caucus’s dedication to the same is worth celebrating and so are the members of Congress leading the way to do so.” 

     

    Jordan Schreiber, Director of Government Relations, The Wilderness Society: “The Wilderness Society celebrates this bipartisan caucus’s commitment to protecting public lands and access to them, which starts with keeping them in public hands. We look forward to working with members to ensure that any future efforts to sell off these national treasures to the highest bidder are defeated.” 

     

    Tom Cors, Senior Director of Legislative Affairs, The Nature Conservancy: “Public lands need to be kept in public hands. They are not just picturesque selfie backdrops. People across America depend on them for jobs, to recharge their internal batteries, and to clean our water and air. Also, wildlife depend on them for food and shelter. Through this caucus, Representatives Ryan Zinke and Gabe Vasquez are ensuring our public lands will last forever, giving life to us all.” 
     

    David Feinman, Vice President of Government Affairs, Conservation Lands Foundation: “Conservation Lands Foundation applauds Representatives Gabe Vasquez and Ryan Zinke for working across the aisle to launch the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus, which will hold Congress accountable to protect access to America’s public lands and ensure they remain in public hands. Our nation’s public lands contain remarkable and irreplaceable ecological, historical and cultural resources that reflect thousands of years of human connection to lands and waters, and we look forward to the Public Lands Caucus reflecting the overwhelming bipartisan support across America for keeping public lands in public hands.” 

     

    Maite Arce, President and CEO, Hispanic Access Foundation: “Hispanic Access Foundation applauds the launch of the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus and the leadership of Representatives Vasquez and Zinke. Public lands are essential to our way of life—they support local economies, provide space for recreation and reflection, and contribute to the health and well-being of communities across the country. This caucus is an important step toward protecting these treasured places and ensuring they remain accessible and well-managed for future generations.” 

     

    Chris Wood, President and CEO, Trout Unlimited: “Public lands are the backyard of the little guy, demonstrating our commitment to leaving the world a better place for our children than the one we inherited from our parents. On behalf of Trout Unlimited members across the nation, I thank Congressmen Zinke and Vasquez and the members of the newly minted bipartisan Public Lands Caucus for their leadership upholding our legacy of public lands. Preventing large-scale transfer or sale of federal public lands helps to maintain access to some of the best places to fish and hunt on the planet. We look forward to working with the caucus to keep it that way.” 

     

    Athan Manuel, Director of Sierra Club’s Lands Protection Program: “Our public lands are part of what makes this country great. They preserve critical habitat, provide our communities with clean air and water, and exploring these places has been a rite of passage for countless generations of Americans. It is more critical than ever that these treasured landscapes remain in the hands of we the people. The Public Lands Caucus will play an important – and bipartisan – role in ensuring Congress does its part to keep it that way.” 

     

    Tom Kiernan, CEO, American Rivers: Public lands are the source of clean drinking water for millions of Americans. The rivers that flow across our national parks, forests, and rangelands provide recreation and awesome scenic beauty to our country.  We are excited to continue working with Congress to support the protection of these lands and rivers on behalf of all Americans. Thank you to Representatives Vasquez and Zinke for launching this caucus. 

     

    Joel Pedersen, President and CEO, Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership: “On both sides of the aisle, Americans cherish our public lands. From the Northern Rockies of Montana to the Gila Mountains of New Mexico, these lands and waters provide invaluable opportunities to millions of hunters and anglers. We join our nation’s sportsmen and women in thanking Representatives Zinke and Vasquez for their leadership in forming the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus which will continue to advance America’s outdoor legacy.” 

     

    Lesli Allison, Chief Executive Officer, Western Landowners Alliance: “The Western Landowners Alliance applauds the formation of the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus to protect our public lands and thanks Representatives Vazquez and Zinke for their leadership on this issue. Care for our public lands is a priority across party lines and fence lines in the West. Western Landowners Alliance members steward tens of millions of acres of private and public land, and recognize the challenges facing federal land management and budgets. We are also acutely aware of the nation’s real housing deficit. But disposal of federal land is not a practical solution to either problem.”  

     

    Paul Hendricks, Executive Director, The Conservation Alliance: “Conservation has been supported by folks from both political parties and nearly all demographics for generations – America’s best and most durable public lands protections have come from members of Congress working together across party lines. Yet many of those places are now at risk of losing those protections, which would be detrimental to our nation’s economy. Safeguarding nature creates jobs, supports local economies as well as the $1.2 trillion outdoor recreation economy, and ensures these benefits exist for future generations. The Conservation Alliance and our 200 business members are excited to see the launch of the Public Lands Caucus and thank Representative Vasquez and Representative Zinke for taking the lead.” 

     

    Devin O’Dea, Western Policy & Conservation Manager, Backcountry Hunters & Anglers: “Backcountry Hunters & Anglers strongly supports the creation of the Public Lands Caucus and thanks Representatives Vasquez and Zinke for bringing together a bipartisan force to defend against ongoing threats to sell or transfer our wild public lands. Our public lands define who we are as Americans — places where anyone, regardless of background, can hunt, fish, camp or explore. The Public Lands Caucus is a crucial step in ensuring our wild public lands, waters, and wildlife endure.” 

     

    Ariel Wiegard, Vice President of Government Affairs, Pheasants Forever and Quail Forever: “America’s upland hunters and grassland advocates applaud today’s launch of the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus, and we stand ready to work with Reps. Vasquez, Zinke, and the other Caucus members to advance public land conservation policies, increase and improve habitat and access, and energize and engage the upland conservation community. America’s grassland and sagebrush shrub-steppe ecosystems are among the most at-risk environments in the world, resulting in the decline of our most cherished grassland species and fewer places to hunt on high-quality habitat—we are confident this Caucus will help ensure our treasured public lands deliver the promise of more wildlife and more hunters, alongside other natural resource and quality of life benefits, to the American people.” 

     

    Jason Burckhalter, Co-CEO, National Wild Turkey Federation: “The NWTF extends deep gratitude to Congressmen Vasquez and Zinke for their leadership in founding the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus. This crucial effort bolsters the unique American public trust, ensuring our public lands—vital habitats for wildlife, cornerstones of our hunting heritage, and cherished spaces for outdoor recreation—remain a shared resource, held in trust for all citizens, preserving their accessibility and stewardship for future generations.”  

     

    Louis Geltman, Vice President for Policy and Government Relations, Outdoor Alliance: “Outdoor Alliance is grateful to Representatives Gabe Vasquez and Ryan Zinke for their leadership in creating the Public Lands Caucus. Public lands need champions, and we look forward to working with members of the caucus to protect public lands and waters and outdoor recreation experiences. Outdoor recreation is a bipartisan value and benefits the millions of Americans who get outside each year. We look forward to building momentum for the caucus’s work to support outdoor recreation, public lands and waters, and conservation.” 

     

    Caroline Gleich, professional athlete, advocate and former candidate for U.S. in Utah: “As someone who has spent my life exploring and advocating for public lands, I’m thrilled to support the launch of the Public Lands Caucus. These lands are more than lines on a map—they’re where we connect with nature, with each other, and with something larger than ourselves. I applaud Representative Vasquez for his leadership in creating a space in Congress to prioritize conservation, recreation, and access for all. At a time when public lands are under threat from extractive industries and political indifference, this caucus sends a clear message: our lands are not for sale. They belong to the people—and we’re here to protect them.” 

     

    America Fitzpatrick, Conservation Program Director, League of Conservation Voters: “We applaud the establishment of the bipartisan Public Lands Caucus led by Representatives Vasquez and Zinke. The bipartisan nature of this caucus underscores how public lands unite us. Public lands across the country provide countless recreational, cultural, health, and economic opportunities. Proposals like the dark-of-night amendment to sell-off public lands in Utah and Nevada during last night’s House Natural Resources Committee markup have no place in the Budget Reconciliation process and we look forward to working with the caucus to ensure our lands and waters are protected for generations to come.” 

     

    Kellis Moss, Managing Director of Federal Affairs for Ducks Unlimited: “Public lands make hunting, fishing, and other outdoor recreation activities accessible for millions of Americans. Some of our most critical conservation programs, such as NAWCA, invest in habitat on public lands. We’re glad to see Congress prioritize conserving America’s natural places for the next generation of outdoorsmen and women, and we’re happy to support the Public Lands Caucus in this effort.” 

     

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: The Chinese Red Cross Society has formed more than 1,000 rescue teams.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 7 (Xinhua) — The Red Cross Society of China (RCSC) has formed more than 1,000 specialized rescue teams with a total of about 100,000 members to carry out emergency rescue operations, the RCSC said at a press conference on Wednesday.

    These teams work in eight areas, including disaster relief, medical assistance, water supply, public health, emergency transportation, psychological support, search and rescue, and water rescue.

    CRCC Vice Chairman Wang Bin said that in 2024, the organization carried out 565 emergency response measures and distributed 775,000 units of emergency aid.

    The KOKK intends to continue to actively use its network of local branches and volunteers, implement technological solutions to enhance rescue capacity and coordinate with emergency management agencies to promptly provide emergency assistance to populations affected by natural disasters.

    Bei Xiaochao, chairman of the board of the China Red Cross Foundation, stressed that the foundation uses a closed system that covers all areas of activity, from fundraising and resource allocation to monitoring compliance with accepted standards.

    According to him, the fund provides updated information on rescue operations and distribution of funds in real time and in accordance with legal regulations, publishes reports on the receipt and expenditure of donations, as well as audit reports. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Vice Premier of the State Council of China Meets with Chairman of the Management Committee of the Abu Dhabi Sovereign Wealth Fund

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 7 (Xinhua) — Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng met with Majid Al Romaithi, chairman of the governing committee of Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing on Wednesday.

    He Lifeng, also a member of the Politburo of the CPC Central Committee, said that since the beginning of this year, China’s economy has made a solid start, high-quality development has made solid progress, and public confidence and expectations have continued to improve.

    The Vice Premier stressed that China will continue to comprehensively deepen reforms and promote high-level opening-up in various fields such as the financial sector. China welcomes foreign financial institutions including ADIA and long-term investors to do business in China and seize the development opportunities, He Lifeng added.

    Majid Al Romaithi, for his part, said that ADIA is optimistic about China’s economic prospects and looks forward to cooperation and exchanges with China in various fields. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Breaking News: China and Russia Have Found the Right Path for Coexistence of Large Neighboring Countries – Xi Jinping

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Moscow, May 7 /Xinhua/ — China and Russia have found the right path for coexistence between large neighboring countries, Chinese President Xi Jinping said in the Russian capital on Wednesday.

    Xi Jinping made the statement in a written speech published upon his arrival in Moscow on a state visit and to attend events marking the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War.

    The Chinese leader noted that the two sides have formed a spirit of Chinese-Russian strategic interaction in the new era, which is characterized by eternal good-neighborly friendship, comprehensive strategic interaction and cooperation for mutual benefit and common gain.

    According to Xi Jinping, independent, mature and sound China-Russia relations not only bring great benefits to the two peoples, but also make important contributions to maintaining global strategic stability and building an equal and orderly multipolar world. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Urgent: China and Russia will jointly defend the results of the victory in World War II, oppose hegemonism and power politics – Xi Jinping

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Moscow, May 7 /Xinhua/ — China and Russia will jointly defend the results of victory in World War II and oppose hegemonism and power politics, Chinese President Xi Jinping said in Moscow on Wednesday.

    Xi Jinping made the statement in a written speech published upon his arrival in the Russian capital on a state visit and to attend events marking the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War.

    China and Russia, as important major countries in the world and permanent members of the UN Security Council, will firmly safeguard the international system with the UN as its core and the international order based on international law, adhere to genuine multilateralism, and promote the building of a more just and reasonable global governance system, the Chinese leader said. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Kaptur, Bell, Quigley, Johnson Send Letter Opposing Ed Martin Nomination Over Russian Media Ties

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)

    Washington, DC — Representatives Marcy Kaptur (OH-09), Wesley Bell (MO-01), Mike Quigley (IL-05), and Hank Johnson (GA-04), led a letter to President Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi raising serious concerns over the potential nomination of Ed Martin to serve as US Attorney for the District of Columbia. Congresswoman Kaptur is the Co-Founder and Co-Chair and Congressman Quigley serves as Democratic Co-Chair of the Congressional Ukraine Caucus, and Congressman Bell is a new member of the Caucus. Additionally, Congressman Johnson is a senior member of the House Judiciary Committee, and Congressman Bell previously served as St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney, leading Missouri’s largest prosecutor’s office.

    The letter cites Martin’s extensive history of appearances on Russian state-funded media outlets RT and Sputnik — over 150 times in recent years — as cause for alarm given the sensitive nature of the role. The lawmakers argue that Martin’s public statements on these platforms, many of which were not disclosed,  have often echoed Kremlin propaganda and undermined US national security interests, particularly regarding Russia’s aggression in Ukraine.

    “Mr. Martin’s public contributions to Russian-backed platforms are deeply troubling to consider when considering how these views may reflect his stance toward critical issues related to Ukraine and national security. The downplaying of Russian aggression and interference in Ukraine he has espoused on Russian media raises concerns about his ability to uphold U.S. interests, particularly at a time when Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has escalated tensions globally. Additionally, his denying evidence of a Russian military buildup near Ukraine’s borders and suggesting that it was the US, not the Assad Regime, who ‘engineered’ the deadly 2017 Syrian chemical weapons attack. His appearances have included promoting narratives that align with Russian propaganda over US policy positions and our national interests,” said the lawmakers.

    “Crucially, Mr. Martin did not fully disclose his extensive involvement with RT and Sputnik as required on his Senate Judiciary Committee questionnaire. This failure in transparency regarding his associations with Russian-backed media outlets calls into question his judgment and commitment to serving the interests of the United States. The US government has consistently recognized RT and Sputnik as propaganda and intelligence tools of the Russian state, and his refusal to disclose his participation raises serious doubts about his loyalty to American values,” continued the lawmakers.

    “Given the gravity of these concerns, we urge you to conduct a thorough review of Mr. Martin’s past statements, associations, and overall fitness for the role of US Attorney for the District of Columbia. The appointment of an individual with such questionable allegiances could have serious repercussions for both US foreign policy and the integrity of our legal system,” concluded the lawmakers.

    Read the full text of the letter here.

    # # #

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: WATCH: Senator Reverend Warnock Highlights Wrongly Terminated CDC Employees, Demands Accountability from Senior HHS Nominee

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock – Georgia

    WATCH: Senator Reverend Warnock Highlights Wrongly Terminated CDC Employees, Demands Accountability from Senior HHS Nominee

    During a Tuesday Senate Finance Committee hearing, Senator Reverend Warnock questioned Jim O’Neill, the nominee to be Secretary Kennedy’s second in command at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
    Senator Warnock also used the hearing to highlight the unjust firings of thousands of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) employees
    The Senator also instructed Gary Andres, the nominee to be an Assistant Secretary of Legislation at HHS, that if confirmed, he would ensure timely answers to Congressional letters – several of Senator Warnock’s letters to HHS have gone unanswered
    The Senator has continued his work to champion to CDC while the agency’s work to protect public health and national security has been under attack from the Trump Administration. The Senator has rallied with fired CDC workers and held then HHS Secretary Nominee Kennedy accountable for his dangerous rhetoric about the centers
    Senator Reverend Warnock: “Yes or no, do you think it is appropriate to fire HHS or CDC, public health experts for ‘performance issues’ who had just gotten positive performance evaluations?”

    Watch Senator Warnock at Tuesday’s Finance Committee hearing HERE
    Washington, D.C. – Yesterday, U.S. Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-GA) demanded answers from Jim O’Neill about the wrongful firings of high-performing public health experts. O’Neill is the nominee to be the Deputy Secretary at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). During the Senate Finance Committee hearing, the Senator pressed O’Neil about the unjust firing of Georgia-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) employees.
    “Mr. O’Neill, these folks are my constituents, I know them, they are my neighbors, I bump into them at the grocery store. Many of them had just gotten performance evaluations saying they are doing an outstanding job. Only to be fired weeks later for ‘Performance issues, ’” askedSenator Reverend Warnock. “If confirmed, you’d oversee personnel, yes or no, do you think it is appropriate to fire HHS or CDC, public health experts, for ‘performance issues’ who had just gotten positive performance evaluations?”
    Senator Warnock also took time to address the lackluster transparency at HHS, despite being a part of an administration that claims to prioritize transparency. Senator Warnock has sent several letters to Secretary Kennedy and other leadership at HHS, but none of the letters have been answered.
    “If confirmed to be the primary liaison between HHS and Congress, will you ensure that I finally get a complete and thorough response to this and all of my letters? Will you commit to ensuring that HHS communicates timely and transparently with me and my staff on CDC reorganization plans? The Secretary still hasn’t answered my letter,” Senator Warnock asked Gary Andres who would be the chief liaison between HHS and Congress.
    “Tell the Secretary to answer my letters,” Senator Warnock demanded to conclude his line of questioning.
    During Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy’s nomination hearing in committee, Senator Warnock spoke at length defending the importance of the CDC, which employs over 10,000 hardworking Georgians. Shortly after, the Senator spoke for nearly an hour on the Senate floor, in large part in defense of the CDC’s critical work to defend public health and national security. The Senator has continued to pressure HHS Secretary Kennedy to reverse the CDC firings.
    Since CDC employees became a target of this administration, Senator Warnock has led several efforts defending their employment and the crucial role they play in keeping the nation safe. Earlier this year, Senator Warnock sent a letter to the Acting Director of the CDC about the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), asking for updates on operations. He also sent two additional letters to President Trump and Secretary Kennedy, respectively, urging the administration to reconsider any plans to eliminate the Division of HIV Prevention at the CDC and requesting additional information about the termination of 20,000 full-time staff and organizational restructuring at HHS. Senator Warnock also spoke at a rally organized by current and former CDC employees to support Georgians who have been callously fired from the public health institution. And his staff hosted a round table with fired CDC employees to brainstorm ways to push back on the administration. 
    Watch the Senator’s full remarks and line of questioning HERE.
    See below a full transcript of the exchanges between Senator Warnock and the HHS nominees:
    Senator Reverend Warnock (SRW): “The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC, is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. I am proud to continue the legacy of our great Georgia Senator Johnny Isakson, who made it his mission to champion the important work of CDC when he served on this very committee.”
    “Mr. O’Neill, welcome and congratulations on your nomination. If confirmed as Deputy Secretary of HHS, you would be the number two person to Secretary Kennedy, responsible for the inward-facing operations and day-to-day management of personnel and HHS, including the CDC. But you’d be stepping into an agency that’s mired right now in chaos, following the exodus of 20,000 staff through resignations, unjust firings, including over 3,000 dedicated CDC experts during a historic measles outbreak.”
    “Mr. O’Neill, these folks are my constituents, I know them, they are my neighbors, I bump into them at the grocery store. Many of them had just gotten performance evaluations saying that they were doing an outstanding job. Only to be fired weeks later for “performance issues.” If confirmed, you’d oversee personnel, yes or no, do you think it is appropriate to fire HHS or CDC, public health experts for “performance issues” who had just gotten positive performance evaluations?” 
    Jim O’Neill (JO):“Thank you for the question, Senator. As I said earlier, I had the pleasure of working at HHS for six years in the Bush Administration, and I always enjoyed working with CDC officials…”
    (SRW): “Sir I read your bio and I’m going to run out of time. Do you think it is appropriate to fire these officials who had just got a great evaluation?”
    (JO): “Senator, my understanding of both the proposed organization and RIF (Reeducation in Force) was that the decisions about which personnel should be retained going forward is made by the heads of the operating divisions. I don’t have any inside information on the agency – I believe that the leadership of CDC decided which people should be RIF’d.” 
    (SRW): “Do you think it is appropriate just from an issue of fairness, I’ve talked to these folks one-on-one. CDC workers share with me that they have gotten positive performance evaluations weeks earlier, only to be given notice that they were fired, not only were they given notice that they were fired, but weeks later they get a poor performance evaluation. You’re in charge of personnel. Do you think that’s fair?”
    “Do you think that would be fair, just as someone who has managed personnel, on its face, does that strike you as dealing with people in an honorable way, who are serving our country? Even if you had to fire them, even if you felt like you had to streamline them for whatever reason. Do you think it is fair for someone to get a great performance evaluation and weeks later hear they are doing poorly, even as DOGE says we are dealing with waste?”
    (JO): “Senator, it is always unpleasant to fire people, even if their function is no longer needed or they are not performing…”
    (SRW): “Do you think it is an honorable way of handling people, sir? Yes or no?”
    (JO): “I don’t know the particulars of the situation, perhaps they had a different supervisor the second time.”
    (SRW): “If confirmed, will you commit to restoring the full functionality of each congressionally mandated CDC office that provides life-saving services and programs to the American people? Will you and your staff report directly to this committee on the status of restoring the programs?”
    (JO): “It’s vitally important that every function and responsibility of HHS that’s set out in law be conducted and aimed toward success. If there are two functions that are appropriate that make more sense to be done within the same agency rather than separate agencies, it makes sense to put them together. If they duplicate functions being performed by more than one part of HHS, it makes sense to combine them. That seems to be the philosophy that was stated behind the proposed reorganization. It seems like a reasonable philosophy to me. That does absolutely preserve the essential functions of HHS that you cited.”
    (SRW): “So even as this process – and I think it is charitable to call it a process, it’s been awfully chaotic – even as this ensues, this administration claims its goal is radical transparency. But there has been no transparency around CDC cuts.”
    “In fact, I wrote to the Secretary in March, who I met with in my office, demanding specific information on CDC firings, and I still haven’t gotten a response from the Secretary.”
    “Mr. Andres, if confirmed to be the primary liaison between HHS and Congress, will you ensure that I finally get a complete and thorough response to this and all of my letters? Will you commit to ensuring that HHS communicates timely and transparently with me and my staff on CDC reorganization plans? The Secretary still hasn’t answered my letter.”
    Gary Andres (GA): “Thank you for the question, Senator Warnock. I know that as a top priority for you…”
    (SRW): “It’s a top priority for my constituents.”
    (GA): “…And your constituents, and your staff communicated to me how important CDC and the employees are to you. I will say this, I understand the importance of developing a relationship with trust, of accountability, and getting back to you, and I will commit to work with you on those things.”
    “I think that when we talk about congressional letters, they will vary in terms of their level of complexity, and so it is hard to come up with some specific timeframe. But I understand the importance, I will commit to working with you on those things.” 
    (SRW): “Tell the Secretary to answer my letter!”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Join the Open Innovation Team at Civil Service Live 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    Join the Open Innovation Team at Civil Service Live 2025

    Explore expert insights, practical policy support and new ideas at our Session Hub

    The Open Innovation Team (OIT) is hosting a Session Hub at Civil Service Live 2025, taking place on 8–9 July at ExCeL London.

    OIT helps civil servants tackle complex policy challenges by working with leading academics and external experts to generate ideas and analysis for policy. We support departments across the policy cycle – from reviewing evidence and generating ideas to developing policy and evaluating impact.

    At our Session Hub, you’ll be able to:

    • Attend short talks from top academics on priority policy topics, with insights you can apply to your work  

    • Join discussions with experts and colleagues about practical solutions

    • Speak with OIT colleagues about how we can support your policy goals

    Drop by to learn from experts, connect with our team – and discover how we can help you research, deliver and evaluate better policy.

    For more information, visit our Civil Service Live page 

    Sign up to our events mailing list

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 7 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Ranking Member Kaptur Remarks at Fiscal Year 2026 US Department of Energy Budget Hearing

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (OH-09)

     

    *** WATCH A FULL RECORDING OF THE HEARING HERE ​***

    Washington, DC — Today, Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur (OH-09), Ranking Member of the House Appropriations Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Subcommittee, delivered the following opening remarks at the subcommittee’s fiscal year 2026 budget hearing for the US Department of Energy with Energy Secretary Chris Chris Wright:

    Good morning, and thank you all for joining us.

    As the Ranking Member of this subcommittee and a lifelong advocate for America’s energy independence in perpetuity, I welcome this opportunity to examine the Department of Energy’s recent actions and to discuss your proposed budget.

    Let me begin with a plain truth: The essentials of life are freshwater, food, and energy. The United States cannot afford to shortchange our energy future. US energy independence is essential for our liberty. I served President Jimmy Carter during the turbulent era not so long ago when the US slid into unconscious dependence on global energy supplies. My motto from then until now “never again.”

    The Department of Energy is the engine room of our nation’s energy security. It drives innovation. It serves as a critical steward of our nuclear security enterprise, and environmental obligations. We have not always done well there. It powers our economy. It protects our grid. It supports cutting-edge research, and ensures that our people — working families, industrious small and large businesses, farmers, our retirees — all have access to affordable, reliable energy and continuing energy innovation.

    And yet, we are confronted with proposals to slash $20 Billion in Department of Energy programs, despite clear and present threats to our energy stability. The Administration’s devastating 74 percent cut to Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy is not just shortsighted, it is dangerous. Since January, the Department of Energy has suspended critical energy programs, cancelled executed awards and contracts authorized by Congress, severely reduced staffing, including removal of the Inspector General who tries to go after the crooks, and changed contracting policies. The resulting confusion has disrupted communities, businesses, and project developers across our country. This chaotic approach to this critical sector of a strong America and our national security impacts every family, business and community. Already, our people are feeling directly how the pinch feels when rising energy costs impact every American family and business.

    Let me be crystal clear. Weakening US energy progress at DOE is a direct threat to America’s energy security and gives our enemies relief. Weakness in advancing America’s energy intelligence leaves us open and exposed to foreign influence. Radical cutbacks weaken our domestic supply chains and delay the very innovations that would shield our economy from global price shocks and hasten enemy targeting. I am shocked by the damage the Administration’s proposals are causing and will continue to cause.

    Energy is essential to our way of life and economic growth of all of our communities. The United States is producing more oil than ever before — record-high production levels — something that, in theory, should be bringing gasoline prices down, not bobbing back and forth. But the reality is, American families have not been seeing sustained record-low gas prices. Why? Because we are still tethered to a volatile global energy market dominated by cartels and petroleum dictators. Oil prices declined recently after the OPEC cartel and its allies agreed to a further boost to output. US crude fell 2 percent to $53.13 a barrel, its lowest value since February 2021. Let me be the first Member of Congress to warn you that dependence on foreign crude is not in the national security interests of our nation.

    Forty-eight years ago, as our nation’s economy tanked and sank into deep depression due to the first Arab oil embargo, President Carter and our predecessors in Congress created the US Department of Energy. With their vision and steadfast bipartisan commitment over decades, our nation has steadily made progress in attaining domestic energy independence. We cannot take our foot off the accelerator.

    Over the last 40 years, America has made remarkable progress through expanding domestic oil and gas production. Ohio knows this well. We have developed cheaper, cleaner energy sources. Competition brings lower prices in energy. Innovations, including biofuels, solar, energy storage, and thermal recovery, are pushing into new energy frontiers of fusion, advanced nuclear, and hydrogen.

    Let’s not forget — when Russia invaded Ukraine, it wasn’t just a European crisis. That illegal invasion sent energy prices soaring around the world. The Department of Energy’s swift action to deploy strategic reserves and accelerate clean energy deployment helped soften the blow. But without a fully resourced Department, our ability to respond next time will be severely limited. This posture is dangerous.

    American energy independence is about more than geopolitics. Hardworking families in Northwest Ohio and across our country feel these pressures at the pump, see it in their utility bills, and at the checkout counter at the grocery store.

    Our nation is approaching 350 million people. We cannot behave as though this is 1950. Undermining the US Department of Energy by severely underfunding advanced energy research risks higher energy costs, increased geopolitical volatility, and weaker national security. That is not a future America should accept.

    Mr. Secretary, I would also like to close by raising for your awareness a district-centric issue that holds national implications: two of the five worst commercial nuclear power incidents in our nation’s history occurred in Ohio’s Nuclear North that I represent. That’s 40 percent! These dangerous and ultimately criminally negligent operations represent the worst management of commercial nuclear power in our nation’s history.

    Ratepayers in Ohio have for 40 years been the victim of these corrupt commercial nuclear operations — all through the willful federal and state abdication of quality management by the Atomic Energy Commission, the Department of Energy, and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Our ratepayers deserve and are due justice — they have been paying for the crimes and slipshod decision. So I ask that you help me from your position to achieve justice for Ohio’s billed ratepayers; the price gouging continues as we meet here today.

    As we work on FY 26 appropriations, I will fight to ensure this Energy and Water bill invests in America’s every future, our energy independence, in world-class innovation, and diversifying energy supplies as fundamental to our continuing economic strength. I have a notebook I have prepared for you and your staff outlining what has been going on in Ohio. It is absolutely un-American what has gone on there, and it has gone on for a long time. America’s energy future is in your hands. Everything must be “Made in America,” for America to assure a remarkable history for the generations to come.

    Thank you, and I look forward to the discussion ahead.

    # # #

    MIL OSI USA News –

    May 8, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Chinese authorities have called on the financial sector to increase credit support for small and micro enterprises.

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, May 7 (Xinhua) — China’s National Financial Supervision Administration on Wednesday called for maintaining stable growth in lending to small and micro enterprises and continuously improving the quality of credit services provided to them.

    In its circular, the department said that banking and financial institutions need to ensure sufficient supply of credit for small and micro enterprises, aiming to ensure that the growth rate of inclusive lending to small and micro enterprises is at par with the growth rate of all types of loans.

    The Authority also called on the above-mentioned institutions to strengthen regulation of the cost of credit, and scientifically and rationally determine the interest rate levels for inclusive lending to small and micro enterprises.

    In addition, banking and financial institutions are encouraged to leverage their professional advantages and increase financial support for small and micro enterprises in the areas of foreign trade, private sector, technology and consumption.

    As of the end of February 2025, the total outstanding inclusive loans issued to small and micro enterprises nationwide stood at 33.9 trillion yuan (about 4.71 trillion U.S. dollars), up 12.6 percent year-on-year. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    May 8, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 796 797 798 799 800 … 1,780
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress