Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Privatisation of preventive screening – E-001681/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001681/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR)

    The Greek government is privatising preventive newborn screening by 2029, aiming to adopt a genetic analysis method through human genome sequencing instead of traditional biochemical testing. The process will be entrusted to RealGenix and Beginnings, with the research results belonging to these companies, which raises serious ethical and technical issues, as genetic analysis is still at the pilot stage worldwide.

    The ‘programmatic agreement’ between the Ministry of Health and the two companies provides for the conduct of genetic testing for 100,000 newborns by 2029, without prior scientific evaluation or opinion from competent institutions. This process raises concerns about the management of personal data, as well as the possible exploitation of citizens’ genetic material by private companies, with a potential benefit for multinational pharmaceutical and insurance companies. In the absence of transparency and safeguards in a programmatic agreement between the public sector and companies for the genomic analysis of 100,000 newborns, despite the official assurance of compliance with the GDPR, the genetic material becomes the property of the company without clear guarantees for its non-commercial exploitation.

    In view of this:

    • 1.Are the strict confidentiality clause, the lack of public access to the agreement and the opacity of funding compatible with the objective of protecting the personal data of future Greek children?
    • 2.Has the Commission examined whether the ‘programmatic agreement’ meets European standards for the protection of the GDPR?

    Submitted: 26.4.2025

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Newsletters – April 2025 – Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs

    Source: European Parliament

    Among the topics of this edition:

    • New Regulation on a common system for the return of third-country nationals staying irregularly in the Union
    • The EU Agenda and Action Plan on Drugs and the EU Drugs strategy: state of play and future initiatives
    • The European Ports Alliance and its Public-Private Partnership: joint fight against drug trafficking and organised crime

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Music created by artificial intelligence – competition between humans and machines? – E-000733/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Directive (EU) 2019/790[1] introduced a set of rules to ensure creators’ fair remuneration and an exception allowing, under certain conditions, the use of protected works and other subject matter for the purposes of text and data mining. Rightholders may opt out from the exception by expressing their reservation in an appropriate manner.

    The Commission is working to support the effective implementation of the reservation mechanism. In particular, the Commission will soon launch a study to assess the opportunity of introducing a central registry of opt-outs which could make it easier for rightholders to express their rights reservation.

    The Artificial Intelligence Act[2] establishes transparency obligations for deployers of artificial intelligence (AI) systems to disclose the existence of generated or manipulated content, including artistic content, in an appropriate manner that does not hamper the work’s display or enjoyment.

    The AI Office is tasked with enabling the drawing up of codes of practice to facilitate the effective implementation of the obligations on the detection and labelling of artificially generated or manipulated content.

    The implementation of the labelling obligations on music content will contribute to increase transparency on the use of AI-generated music and uphold the unique value of human creativity.

    The Commission will further examine the opportunities and challenges related to the use of AI for music creators and artists before deciding whether to propose potential further measures. The Commission is currently developing an AI strategy for cultural and creative industries.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/790/oj/eng
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=OJ:L_202401689
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – ENISA agreement with the Republic of Korea – E-001002/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    Close cooperation with like-minded countries is essential in order to enhance preparedness and resilience in cybersecurity. As explained in Recital 54 of Regulation (EU) 2019/881[1], cyber threats are a global problem, and therefore close international cooperation is necessary to improve cybersecurity standards, and to promote swifter response to network and information security issues.

    In this context, Article 12 of that regulation states that the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA) should support the EU involvement and cooperation with third countries and international organisations.

    ENISA’s International strategy[2] from November 2021 sets out that international cooperation should focus on partners with which the EU has strategic economic relationships, and which share EU values.

    The EU has regular exchanges on cybersecurity with South Korea framed under the ongoing Cyber Dialogue, which is co-chaired by Commission services and the European External Action Service.

    It is in that context that further discussions on inter-agencies cooperation on cybersecurity could be considered, taking into account the overall priorities of international engagements of both parties as well as the mandate of the respective agencies.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/881/oj/eng
    • [2] https://www.enisa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/all_files/2022-02-16 ENISA International Strategy.pdf
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Ordinary Delegation meeting – 7 May 2025, Strasbourg – Delegation to the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Parliament’s Delegation to the EU-Serbia Stabilisation and Association Parliamentary Committee will hold an ordinary meeting on Wednesday, 7 May 2025, from 15.00 to 16.00, in Strasbourg, room CHURCHILL 200.
    During the meeting, Members will hold an exchange of views on recent developments in Serbia with

    • Bojana Zorić, Research Analyst, European Union Institute for Security Studies – Paris
    • Ivan Đurić, Policy Analyst, Center for Research, Transparency and Accountability (CRTA) – Belgrade

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Accessibility of household appliances for visually impaired people – E-000884/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Accessibility Act is a directive with legal base Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Under this legal base, the legislator can adopt measures for the approximation of laws in the Member States, with the objective of the establishment and functioning of the internal market.

    The related Impact Assessment clarified that there was no national legislation on accessibility of domestic appliances. Hence no barriers in the market due to divergent legislation were identified, with domestic appliances falling outside the scope of the Commission proposal.

    Nevertheless, the Commission supports the accessibility of user interfaces including by the development of accessibility standards, such as those under standardisation request M587 regarding the accessibility requirements of products and services in support of the European Accessibility Act[1]. These could help manufacturers of domestic appliances to address accessibility of their products.

    In addition, through the AccessibleEU centre, the Commission supports capacity building and training on accessibility including for manufacturing industries.

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/enorm/mandate/587_en
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – Opening of the 5-8 May plenary session

    Source: European Parliament

    European Parliament President Roberta Metsola opened the 5-8 May plenary session with a minute’s silence in memory of His Holiness Pope Francis

    President Roberta Metsola said Pope Francis would be remembered for his “inspirational leadership, his moral authority, and his kindness, taking every opportunity to speak up for a more humane, more peaceful and unified world”. President Metsola remembered the late Pope’s message to MEPs to “work together every day for a better, more compassionate, and more courageous European Parliament”.

    MEPs then held a minute’s silence in memory of Pope Francis, after which political group speakers held a round of short statements.

    World War II Anniversary

    President Metsola announced that, to mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II in Europe, there would be a wreath laying ceremony at 10:30 on Wednesday in front of the Louise Weiss building, followed by a ceremony in the hemicycle including testimonies from three WWII veterans, at 11:30.

    Security Action for Europe (SAFE) Regulation

    President Metsola announced that in accordance with Rule 138 of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, the Legal Affairs Committee had verified the legal basis of the Commission’s SAFE regulation proposal to reinforce Europe’s defence industry and found unanimously, on 23 April 2025, that Article 122 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union was not the appropriate legal basis. President Metsola agreed to write to the Presidents of the Council and of the European Commission accordingly.

    Changes to the agenda

    Tuesday

    The President announced three requests to fast track files under Rule 170(6): CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles for 2025 to 2027; the protection status of the wolf; and amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation as regards securities financing transactions under the net stable funding ratio. The votes on these requests will take place on Tuesday.

    Wednesday

    A Commission statement on the fine against TikTok and the need to strengthen the protection of citizens’ rights on social media platforms is added to the agenda before the debates on Rule 150 on Wednesday afternoon.

    Council and Commission statements on the illegal visit of President Erdogan to the occupied areas of Cyprus are added as the last item on Wednesday afternoon, with one round of group speakers and no resolution.

    As a result of these additions, Wednesday’s sitting will be extended to 23:00.

    Incoming MEPs

    Wolker Schnurrbusch (NI, DE) has replaced Maximilian Krah (NI, DE) as of 4 April 2025.

    Parliamentary immunity

    Hungarian authorities have asked for the Parliamentary immunity of Péter Magyar (EPP, HU) to be waived, and referred the matter to the Legal Affairs Committee.

    Interinstitutional negotiations

    The LIBE, PECH, and jointly, the SEDE and ITRE committees have decided to enter into interinstitutional negotiations, pursuant to Rule 72, paragraph 1 of the Rules of procedure, on the basis of the reports available on the plenary website.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – European Parliament establishes a European Order of Merit

    Source: European Parliament

    To mark the 75th anniversary of the Schuman Declaration, the European Parliament establishes the first European distinction of its kind, a European Order of Merit.

    Ahead of the 75th anniversary of the Schuman Declaration – the founding moment of European unity – the European Parliament’s Bureau has decided to establish the European Order of Merit, the first European distinction of its kind granted by an EU Institution.

    This new civilian distinction will honour the achievements of individuals who have made significant contributions to European integration and European values. All Member States – but Ireland[1] – award distinctions in national orders, reflecting a shared commitment across the Union to recognise excellence and reward contributions that enrich society. There is currently no similar distinction at European Union level. The European Order of Merit aims to fill this gap, reaffirming a shared European identity at a time when global challenges call for stronger unity.

    “Europe is built by its people and the European Order of Merit is for them,” said President Metsola. “This Order celebrates those who lead with courage, act with conviction, and believe — like Robert Schuman — that peace, democracy and dignity are not just ideals, but actions. On the 75th anniversary of Europe’s boldest beginning, we honour those who continue to build it.”

    Proposals for appointment to the Order may be made by the President of the European Parliament, the President of the European Council, the President of the European Commission, Heads of State or Government, and Speakers of national parliaments of the Member State. Each year, up to 20 laureates will then be appointed to the Order by a dedicated committee comprising the President of the European Parliament, two Vice-Presidents, and four eminent European personalities.

    The first ceremony of conferral is expected to take place by 2026.
    With this initiative, the European Parliament pays tribute to the enduring spirit of European unity — from its post-war beginnings to today’s challenges.

    [1] Ireland does not have a system of national orders; instead, it confers honorary titles and awards, such as the Presidential Distinguished Service Award for the Irish Abroad.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Agenda – Tuesday, 6 May 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    80 Border Regions’ instrument for development and growth (BRIDGEforEU)
    Sandro Gozi (A10-0058/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 81 Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 as regards the scope of the rules for benchmarks, the use in the Union of benchmarks provided by an administrator located in a third country, and certain reporting requirements
    Jonás Fernández (A10-0060/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 82 European Union labour market statistics on businesses
    Irene Tinagli (A10-0057/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 60 Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2024/003 BE/Van Hool – Belgium
    Janusz Lewandowski (A10-0080/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 41 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2023
    Gilles Boyer (A10-0049/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 40 Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2023
    Ondřej Knotek (A10-0068/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 20 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world
    Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares (A10-0076/2025     – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00     – Joint alternative motions for resolutions Friday, 2 May 2025, 10:00 66 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds
    Niclas Herbst (A10-0074/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 68 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0052/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 69 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union
    Cristian Terheş (A10-0050/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 70 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Auditors
    Dick Erixon (A10-0047/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 71 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Economic and Social Committee
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0054/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 72 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Committee of the Regions
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0046/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 73 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Ombudsman
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0055/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 74 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Data Protection Supervisor
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0053/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 75 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0069/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 76 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
    Tomáš Zdechovský (A10-0051/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 77 Discharge 2023: Agencies
    Erik Marquardt (A10-0065/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 78 Discharge 2023: Joint Undertakings
    Michal Wiezik (A10-0056/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 39 The European Water Resilience Strategy
    Thomas Bajada (A10-0073/2025     – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 43 2023 and 2024 reports on Türkiye
    Nacho Sánchez Amor (A10-0067/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 102 2023 and 2024 reports on Serbia
    Tonino Picula (A10-0072/2025     – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 104 2023 and 2024 reports on Kosovo
    Riho Terras (A10-0075/2025     – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 5 May 2025, 19:00 Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 19:00 Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Agenda – Thursday, 8 May 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    110 Old challenges and new commercial practices in the internal market
    (O-000012/2025 – B10-0005/25)      – Motions for resolutions Monday, 5 May 2025, 19:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 19:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 20:00     – Requests for “separate”, “split” and “roll-call” votes Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 16:00 98 Arrest and risk of execution of Tundu Lissu, Chair of Chadema, the main opposition party in Tanzania     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 99 Return of Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 100 Violations of religious freedom in Tibet     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 107 The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season
    Borys Budka (A10-0079/2025     – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 109 Screening of foreign investments in the Union
    Raphaël Glucksmann (A10-0061/2025     – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 108 Suspending certain parts of Regulation (EU) 2015/478 as regards imports of Ukrainian products into the European Union
    Karin Karlsbro (A10-0059/2025     – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 57 Competition policy – annual report 2024
    Lara Wolters (A10-0071/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 21 Banking Union – annual report 2024
    Ralf Seekatz (A10-0044/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 106 Objection pursuant to Rule 115(2) and (3): genetically modified soybean MON 87705 × MON 87708 × MON 89788     – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 5 May 2025, 19:00 Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 19:00 Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Agenda – Wednesday, 7 May 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    66 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Commission, executive agencies and European Development Funds
    Niclas Herbst (A10-0074/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 68 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Council and Council
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0052/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 69 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Justice of the European Union
    Cristian Terheş (A10-0050/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 70 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Court of Auditors
    Dick Erixon (A10-0047/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 71 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Economic and Social Committee
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0054/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 72 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – Committee of the Regions
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0046/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 73 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Ombudsman
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0055/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 74 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European Data Protection Supervisor
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0053/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 75 Discharge 2023: EU general budget – European External Action Service
    Joachim Stanisław Brudziński (A10-0069/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 76 Discharge 2023: European Public Prosecutor’s Office
    Tomáš Zdechovský (A10-0051/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 77 Discharge 2023: Agencies
    Erik Marquardt (A10-0065/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 78 Discharge 2023: Joint Undertakings
    Michal Wiezik (A10-0056/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 20 A revamped long-term budget for the Union in a changing world
    Siegfried Mureşan, Carla Tavares (A10-0076/2025     – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00     – Joint alternative motions for resolutions Friday, 2 May 2025, 10:00 39 The European Water Resilience Strategy
    Thomas Bajada (A10-0073/2025     – Amendments by the rapporteur, 71 MEPs at least; Alternative motions for resolutions Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 43 2023 and 2024 reports on Türkiye
    Nacho Sánchez Amor (A10-0067/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 102 2023 and 2024 reports on Serbia
    Tonino Picula (A10-0072/2025     – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 104 2023 and 2024 reports on Kosovo
    Riho Terras (A10-0075/2025     – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 57 Competition policy – annual report 2024
    Lara Wolters (A10-0071/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 107 The role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season
    Borys Budka (A10-0079/2025     – Amendments Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 21 Banking Union – annual report 2024
    Ralf Seekatz (A10-0044/2025     – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00 98 Arrest and risk of execution of Tundu Lissu, Chair of Chadema, the main opposition party in Tanzania     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 99 Return of Ukrainian children forcibly transferred and deported by Russia     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 100 Violations of religious freedom in Tibet     – Motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Monday, 5 May 2025, 20:00     – Amendments to motions for resolutions; joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 13:00     – Amendments to joint motions for resolutions (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 14:00 Separate votes – Split votes – Roll-call votes Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00 Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 5 May 2025, 19:00 Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 19:00 Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Agenda – Monday, 5 May 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    41 Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2023
    Gilles Boyer (A10-0049/2025
        – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00
    40 Control of the financial activities of the European Investment Bank – annual report 2023
    Ondřej Knotek (A10-0068/2025
        – Amendments Wednesday, 30 April 2025, 13:00
    Texts put to the vote on Tuesday Friday, 2 May 2025, 12:00
    Texts put to the vote on Wednesday Monday, 5 May 2025, 19:00
    Texts put to the vote on Thursday Tuesday, 6 May 2025, 19:00
    Motions for resolutions concerning debates on cases of breaches of human rights, democracy and the rule of law (Rule 150) Wednesday, 7 May 2025, 19:00

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Absorption of Recovery and Resilience Facility funds by Greece – E-000948/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Recovery and Resilience Facility[1] (RRF) supports 103 investments and 76 reforms in Greece as set out in a national plan (Greece 2.0) submitted by the Greek authorities to the Commission.

    Disbursement of funds is based on satisfactory fulfilment of related milestones and targets following an assessment carried out by the Commission[2].

    This assessment concerns the fulfilment of the requirements set out in the Council Implementing Decision[3] and verification is based on related evidence submitted by the Greek authorities (e.g. adoption of a law).

    So far, 51% of RRF funds has been disbursed to Greece, and following the recent endorsement by the Commission of the fifth payment request for EUR 3.1 billion, total disbursements to the country will reach 59% in the next months.

    The Greek authorities have adopted measures to facilitate the smooth implementation of the plan and boost administrative capacity, including through the establishment of a dedicated agency (EYSTA) that is part of the Greek Ministry of Economy and Finance.

    In the Council’s country-specific recommendations to Greece of July 2024[4], Greece is further recommended to strengthen administrative capacity to manage EU funds, including RRF funds, accelerate investments, and maintain momentum in the implementation of reforms.

    Greece is notably recommended to address challenges related to: (i) lengthy litigation processes in public procurement procedures that risk causing delays in investments; (ii) slow transfer of property rights; and (iii) weak coordination among Ministries.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility_en
    • [2] https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/economic-recovery/recovery-and-resilience-facility/country-pages/greeces-recovery-and-resilience-plan_en
    • [3] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/803810c9-c307-412e-8e9e-238ae6e76734_en?filename=COM_2024_591_1_EN_annexe_proposition_cp_part1_v4.pdf
    • [4] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/96abbf09-3934-40a6-b234-f60c93928a87_en?filename=com_2024_608_1_en.pdf
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Trade agreements and respect of social and environmental standards – E-001653/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001653/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Benoit Cassart (Renew)

    The European Union is the most important trading power in the world. It accounts for 16.5 % of world trade and 48 % of global gross domestic product, thanks to its vast network of trade agreements.

    While the free trade agreement with New Zealand makes free trade conditional on the respect of social and environmental standards, this new approach is not reflected in the EU’s trade agreements with Chile and Kenya, which do not include a sanction mechanism in the sustainable development chapter.

    • 1.This tailored approach risks creating legal uncertainty. Would it not be more consistent for the Commission to adopt a systematic approach to imposing such standards, including a sanction mechanism?
    • 2.Rather than serving the Sustainable Development Goals, are agreements that do not incorporate this new approach not a barrier to development?

    Submitted: 24.4.2025

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Transparency remains a central focus at subsidies committee discussions

    Source: WTO

    Headline: Transparency remains a central focus at subsidies committee discussions

    The Chair referred to the most recent WTO Secretariat update, noting that 82 members have yet to submit their 2023 and 2021 subsidy notifications, and that  72 members have still not submitted their 2019 notifications. He reiterated his call for members to submit their notifications promptly, emphasizing that all members benefit from the collective effort of timely and complete notifications. Eight members echoed these calls and commended the Secretariat’s continued efforts to support members in preparing and submitting their notifications, including through targeted technical assistance.
    Review of members’ subsidy notifications
    During the special meeting, the Committee examined 2023 new and full subsidy notifications submitted by Albania, Bahrain, Ecuador, India, Kazakhstan and Montenegro. Additionally, it reviewed outstanding notifications from earlier cycles, notably from Madagascar (2019). The Committee also continued its review of 2023 subsidy notifications from Australia, Brazil, China, Eswatini, Nepal, Norway, Türkiye, the United States and Vanuatu. It also continued its review of a 2019 notification from the Russian Federation.
    National legislation
    The Committee reviewed legislative notifications submitted by Armenia, Cambodia, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States. It also continued its review of the legislative notifications of the European Union, Ghana, the Kyrgyz Republic, Saint Kitts and Nevis, and the Solomon Islands.
    Reports of members on countervailing duty actions
    Members reviewed semi-annual reports on countervailing duty actions submitted by Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, the European Union, India, Mexico, Peru, Chinese Taipei, Türkiye,  the United States and Viet Nam for the period July to December 2024.
    The Committee also considered notifications on preliminary and final countervailing duty actions from members including Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Mexico, the United Kingdom and the United States.
    The Chair emphasized the need for regular and timely submissions of these reports to ensure ongoing transparency and effective oversight by the Committee.
    Other matters
    The Chair recalled the 31 December 2015 deadline for the elimination of export subsidies by members that received “fast track” extensions under Article 27.4 of the SCM Agreement. He noted that only 15 of the 19 members that had received extensions have provided the final required notifications. He called on the remaining members to comply without delay.
    The Committee reviewed the updated GNI per capita calculations for members listed in Annex VII(b) of the SCM Agreement. According to the latest figures, Senegal graduated from Annex VII(b) while the following members did not: Congo, Ghana, Honduras, Kenya, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Pakistan and Zimbabwe. They therefore remain on the list until their GNP per capita exceeds US$ 1,000 (in constant 1990 dollars) for three consecutive years.
    The Committee also discussed, and members exchanged views on, a range of issues under the following separate agenda items: “discriminatory subsidies policies and measures of the United States” (item sponsored by China); “France’s electric vehicle subsidies programme” (sponsored by the Republic of Korea); and “subsidies and overcapacity” (sponsored by the European Union, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States).
    The Committee elected Mr Kazumochi Kometani from Japan as the new member of the Permanent Group of Experts replacing Ms Tomoko Ota, also from Japan. 
    The Committee conducted a scheduled review of its trial use of the e-Agenda platform, originally agreed in October 2023, to streamline meeting procedures by enabling the upload of delegations’ statements. The Committee agreed to extend the current trial arrangement for an additional two years. A formal review will take place at the Committee’s spring 2027 meeting.
    Next meeting
    The Chair reminded members that the autumn 2025 meetings of the SCM Committee are scheduled to take place in the week of 27 October 2025.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – E-001010/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The regulation on the establishment of the European Digital Identity (EUDI) Framework[1] mandates Member States to offer digital identity wallets. It provides the possibility for effective age verification (AV) within the EU.

    To bridge the gap until the EUDI wallets become available, the Commission is developing a privacy preserving, data minimising, harmonised AV solution.

    Under Article 28(1) of the Digital Services Act (DSA)[2], all providers of online platforms accessible to minors must ensure a high level of privacy, safety and security to minors on their services.

    Those providers of online platforms accessible to minors, including app stores (i.e. Google Play), must implement appropriate and proportionate measures to fulfil such obligations.

    Independently from app stores’ obligations, some app developers distributing their apps on app stores (i.e. TikTok) also fall under the scope of Article 28(1) of the DSA. To comply with that provision, providers of online platforms accessible to minors may have to implement AV, based on their risk profile[3].

    Providers of app stores designated as very large online platforms are required, under Articles 34 and 35 of the DSA, to identify, analyse and assess the systemic risks stemming from the design, functioning or use made of their services, considering inter alia any actual of foreseeable negative effect for the respect of the rights of the child enshrined in Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU[4], and put in place effective mitigation measures to address such risks.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2024/1183 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 as regards establishing the European Digital Identity Framework (OJ L, 2024/1183, 30.4.2024).
    • [2] Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act) (OJ L 277, 27.10.2022).
    • [3] The Commission will set out in Guidelines in which scenarios it would expect online platforms to implement age verification or age assurance in order to ensure a high level of privacy, safety and security.
    • [4] Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (OJ C 326, 26.10.2012).
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Support for the 100 climate-neutral cities under the Green Deal – E-000580/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In Greece there is a momentum for the EU Climate Neutral and Smart Cities Mission[1]; of the six Greek cities selected for the Cities Mission, five have already received the Mission Label.

    These cities established the ‘Climanet’ network, and the Greek Government announced EUR 20 million to be allocated to these cities for the preparation of studies and the financing of projects[2].

    At European level, 53 Cities have so far been awarded with a Mission Label. A further 33 Climate City Contracts are now under review. 80 more cities have joined the Twinning Learning Programme[3] to replicate good practices: nine are Greek cities[4].

    The Climate City Capital Hub[5], launched in June 2024, helps labelled cities[6] to get projects ready for investment. It offers advice on financing solutions, in cooperation with existing advisory services, such as those offered by the European Investment Bank (EIB), and puts cities in touch with investors.

    Through the ‘Enabling City Transformation Programme’ under Horizon Europe, EUR 21 million were secured in 2024 to deploy advisory services of the EIB[7]. In addition, the EIB ringfenced a lending envelope of EUR 2 billion for the labelled cities to support the implementation of their decarbonisation strategies.

    Greek Mission cities will also receive support from EU Cohesion Policy and, in line with the European Regional Development Fund/Cohesion Fund Regulation[8], they are implementing their sustainable urban development strategies, to support energy efficiency, climate adaptation, smart cities and green transport projects.

    Finally, EU actions, such as the Covenant of Mayors[9], the Green City Accord[10], the European Urban Initiative[11], the URBACT IV programme[12] and others, support cities in capacity-building and knowledge exchange.

    • [1] https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe/eu-missions-horizon-europe/climate-neutral-and-smart-cities_en
    • [2] https://2030.ioannina.gr/?page_id=1121
    • [3] https://netzerocities.eu/twinning-learning-programme/
    • [4] These are Penteli, Palaio Faliro, Mytilene and Vari-Voula-Vouliagmeni (selected for Cohort 1); Chalkida and Chios (in Cohort 2); Fyli, Heraklion and Larisa (in Cohort 3).
    • [5] https://netzerocities.eu/capital-hub/
    • [6] https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/document/942e747e-3ccf-4121-a973-9cc8032fc421_en
    • [7] Including European Local ENergy Assistance (https://www.eib.org/en/products/advisory-services/elena/index)
      and the InvestEU Advisory Hub (https://investeu.europa.eu/investeu-programme/investeu-advisory-hub_en).
    • [8]  OJ L231, 30/06/2021, Article 11.
    • [9] https://eu-mayors.ec.europa.eu/en/home
    • [10] https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/urban-environment/green-city-accord_en
    • [11] https://www.urban-initiative.eu/
    • [12] https://urbact.eu/

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EMA’s role in COVID-19 vaccine approval procedures, inspections and good clinical practice checks – P-001695/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-001695/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Friedrich Pürner (NI)

    A recently published investigation by a German newspaper[1] has revealed that the European Medicines Agency (EMA) omitted or avoided crucial checks to test for side effects during the approval procedures for COVID-19 vaccines. Statutory good clinical practice checks by inspectors to review manufacturers’ clinical studies either did not take place or were limited in scope.

    • 1.Was the Commission aware of what happened? If so, when did it become aware and why did it not intervene?
    • 2.What inspection rules are in place for emergency use authorisation – particularly with regard to studies in non-EU countries – to make sure medicines are safe, the duty of care is upheld and patients are protected?
    • 3.Was the Commission informed by the EMA about occurrences of myocarditis (inflammation of the cardiac muscle) in Israel? If so, when (what date) and by whom (names of those involved), and how did the Commission handle this information on safety signals after mRNA vaccines were administered?

    Submitted: 28.4.2025

    • [1] https://www.welt.de/politik/plus256010158/Impfstoff-Kontrollen-Das-war-politisch-nicht-gewuenscht.html
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Suspension of the right to apply for asylum in Poland and pushback reports from the Poland-Belarus border – E-001623/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001623/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Cecilia Strada (S&D), Alessandro Zan (S&D), Tineke Strik (Verts/ALE)

    At the end of March 2025, a bill amending the Polish Act on Granting Protection to Foreigners entered into force. The new provisions allow the temporary suspension of the right to apply for asylum for migrants entering Poland via its border with Belarus. This bill could pave the way to violations of the non-refoulement principle, as clearly stated by the UNHCR[1] and the Polish Commissioner for Human Rights[2]. It is not the first time that Poland has tried to give legal ground to pushback practices[3].

    These provisions could come into force against a backdrop of a recurring use of pushback practices at the Poland-Belarus border, as reported by several NGOs and researchers[4], and while Poland stands accused of refoulements before the European Court of Human Rights[5].

    Considering that the non-refoulement principle and the prohibition of collective expulsions are binding and unavoidable for Poland:

    • 1.Can the Commission assess the situation on the Poland-Belarus border, notably in relation to the latest report on pushback practices[6]?
    • 2.Which initiatives does the Commission intend to pursue in order to ensure that Poland abides by Article 19 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU and Article 3 of the Convention against Torture?

    Submitted: 23.4.2025

    • [1] https://www.refworld.org/legal/natlegcomments/unhcr/2024/en/149257
    • [2] https://bip.brpo.gov.pl/en/content/chr-draft-amendment-act-granting-protection-foreigners-territory-republic-poland-opinion
    • [3] G. Baranowska, Pushbacks in Poland: grounding the practice in domestic law in 2021, Polish Yearbook of International Law.
    • [4] Inter alia: C. Greener, D. Ozynska, Brutal Barriers. Pushbacks, violence and the violation of human rights on the Poland-Belarus border; Pushed, beaten, left to die. European pushback report 2024; Human Rights Watch, Poland: brutal pushbacks at the Belarus border, 10 December 2024.
    • [5] R.A. and Others v. Poland (no. 42120/21), European court of Human Rights.
    • [6] C. Greener, D. Ozynska, Brutal Barriers. Pushbacks, violence and the violation of human rights on the Poland-Belarus border.
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Request for clarification of the numbers of residency permits issued in the EU – E-000294/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    In accordance with the Treaties, it is a prerogative of the Member States to determine the volumes of admission of third-country nationals coming from third countries to their territory in order to seek work[1]. The Commission cannot determine how many third-country nationals may enter and legally reside in Europe.

    In 2023, Member States issued more than 3,7 million residence permits to non-EU citizens from more than 170 countries[2]. Other than residence permits issued for work (33%) and education (14%), the rest of the permits was granted for family reasons (26%) and other reasons (26%), including international protection[3].

    The Commission has no information about the profiles of the persons who have obtained residency permits for education in the Member States.

    Member States are not required to provide information to the Commission about the profiles of international students, what type of university education they have received in their countries of origin, and what level of degree they aim to obtain in the EU.

    • [1] See Article 79(5) Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
    • [2] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/migr_resfirst/bookmark/table?lang=en&bookmarkId=66195d4d-e3d8-444d-956b-55e8faca4038
    • [3] https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Residence_permits_-_statistics_on_first_permits_issued_during_the_year
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – E-000884/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Accessibility Act is a directive with legal base Article 114 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Under this legal base, the legislator can adopt measures for the approximation of laws in the Member States, with the objective of the establishment and functioning of the internal market.

    The related Impact Assessment clarified that there was no national legislation on accessibility of domestic appliances. Hence no barriers in the market due to divergent legislation were identified, with domestic appliances falling outside the scope of the Commission proposal.

    Nevertheless, the Commission supports the accessibility of user interfaces including by the development of accessibility standards, such as those under standardisation request M587 regarding the accessibility requirements of products and services in support of the European Accessibility Act[1]. These could help manufacturers of domestic appliances to address accessibility of their products.

    In addition, through the AccessibleEU centre, the Commission supports capacity building and training on accessibility including for manufacturing industries.

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/growth/tools-databases/enorm/mandate/587_en
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Anti-white racism and Christianophobia: the forgotten victims of the EU’s strategy against racism – E-001643/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001643/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Fabrice Leggeri (PfE), André Rougé (PfE), Julien Leonardelli (PfE), Pierre Pimpie (PfE), Tom Vandendriessche (PfE), Marieke Ehlers (PfE), Petra Steger (PfE), Jorge Buxadé Villalba (PfE), Kinga Gál (PfE), András László (PfE), Mathilde Androuët (PfE), Marie Dauchy (PfE), Matthieu Valet (PfE), Gilles Pennelle (PfE), Mélanie Disdier (PfE)

    On 15 April 2025, the Commission launched a call for evidence[1] to contribute to the development of the ‘2026-2030 EU anti-racism strategy’.

    The strategy was announced by the President of the Commission Ursula von der Leyen and follows on from the ‘EU Anti-racism Action Plan 2020-2025’[2], which aimed to combat ‘structural racism’. Despite this plan, the Commission believes that ‘more effective protection from racial discrimination and the systematic prevention of racism against all racialised groups[3] is needed’.

    The Commission, entirely driven by woke ideology, plans to rely on controversial reports by the EU Agency for Fundamental Rights entitled ‘Being Black in the EU[4]’ and ‘Being Muslim in the EU[5]’.

    Having initially called for a fight against racism ‘in all its forms’, which would be reasonable, Brussels finally hurried to clarify exactly which forms: ‘anti-Black racism, anti-Asian racism, anti-Muslim racism…’, then states that it will ‘adopt an intersectional approach’.

    Meanwhile, there is no mention of anti-white racism or Christianophobia.

    • 1.Why is the Commission ignoring anti-white racism and Christianophobia in this context?
    • 2.Do the ‘stakeholders’ and key international partners who were consulted receive EU funding?
    • 3.What is the cost of this strategy?

    Supporter[6]

    Submitted: 23.4.2025

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14552-Anti-racism-Strategy_en.
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0565.
    • [3] https://rm.coe.int/ecri-opinion-on-the-concept-of-racialisation/1680a4dcc2.
    • [4] https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2023-being-black_in_the_eu_en.pdf.
    • [5] https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2024-being-muslim-in-the-eu_en.pdf
    • [6] This question is supported by a Member other than the authors: Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain (PfE)

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Violation of EU sanctions against Solovyev by Italian news platforms – E-001677/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001677/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Pina Picierno (S&D)

    Vladimir Solovyev, a well-known Russian journalist and television presenter considered one of the Kremlin’s leading propagandists, was added to the European Union’s sanctions list on 23 February 2022. His assets were frozen and he was banned from entering Member States, including Italy, where his properties worth EUR 8 million were seized.

    In March 2025, his planned appearance on the programme ‘Lo Stato delle cose’ on Italian state television (Rai 3) was cancelled following a report.

    The Italian platform Byoblu, which has always been aligned with Russian narrative, continues to play a key role in spreading Kremlin propaganda, supporting the war of aggression against Ukraine and promoting narratives hostile to the EU and its democratic values, including attacks such as that by spokesperson Zakharova against President Mattarella. On 24 April 2025, that platform announced a new invitation to Solovyev.

    In light of the above, can the Commission answer the following:

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of the practice of two Italian media outlets issuing invitations to Solovyev, in breach of EU sanctions?
    • 2.What measures does it intend to take to ensure compliance and combat pro-Russian disinformation in the Union?

    Submitted: 25.4.2025

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Liver damage as a side effect of COVID-19 vaccination – E-001675/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001675/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Gerald Hauser (PfE)

    Scientific publications document cases of liver damage following vaccination against COVID-19, including immune-mediated hepatitis, acute liver cell injury and liver impairment in transplant patients. Here are a few examples:

    – Liver injury following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A multicenter case series[1]

    – Liver injury after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: Features of immune-mediated hepatitis, role of corticosteroid therapy and outcome[2]

    – Histological and serological features of acute liver injury after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination[3]

    – Risk of acute liver injury following the mRNA (BNT162b2) and inactivated (CoronaVac) COVID-19 vaccines[4]

    – Severe de novo liver injury after Moderna vaccination – not always autoimmune hepatitis[5]

    Not only can liver damage be caused by mRNA vaccination, but the vaccines also have a wide range of other side effects.

    • 1.In hindsight, what does the Commission make of the scientific diligence shown in authorising the mRNA vaccines in view of the wide range of side effects they have?
    • 2.Are any investigations currently being carried out by the Commission or subordinate EU authorities into the safety of mRNA vaccines?
    • 3.Were potential hepatotoxicity, genotoxicity, cardiotoxic effects, immunotoxicity, neurotoxic effects and possible long-term effects on liver function and genetic integrity investigated when the mRNA vaccines were authorised?

    Submitted: 25.4.2025

    • [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34339763/
    • [2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35567545/
    • [3] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36440259/
    • [4] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35817224/
    • [5] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35439566/
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Total funding to Türkiye – E-001586/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001586/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR)

    Türkiye has been funded mainly through the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA). From 2002-2022, Türkiye received more than €9 billion, with the objectives of ‘supporting political reforms, strengthening civil society, protecting the environment and promoting regional development and the rule of law’.

    During the first IPA programming period (2007–2013), Türkiye received around €4.8 billion. In the second phase (2014–2020), €4.5 billion was approved, but part of this was ‘frozen’ due to events following the ‘2016 coup’. From 2021 onwards, funding continued under supposedly stricter conditions and supposedly increased oversight.

    The EU has also provided funding for ‘humanitarian programmes for Syrian refugees in Türkiye, through the Facility for Refugees in Türkiye’, amounting to over €6 billion since 2016 to date.

    In total, Türkiye has received over €18 billion from the EU through these two main mechanisms. In addition, the European Investment Bank has provided Türkiye with loans of €29.3 billion for 278 projects from 1987 to 2018, further strengthening the EU’s financial support to the country.

    Can the Commission, in terms of the value of the euro today, calculate the total amount of grants, technical assistance and soft loans to Türkiye?

    Submitted: 21.4.2025

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – EU funds going to private individuals – E-000344/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission would like to kindly refer the Honourable Member to the publicly available Financial Transparency System (FTS)[1].

    In accordance with Article 38 of the Financial Regulation[2], on the FTS portal, the Commission makes available information of grant recipients of funds financed from the budget . The information concerning financial year 2024 will be published in June 2025.

    The Commission implements EU funding fully in line with the relevant EU legislation adopted by the EU legislator, in particular the Financial Regulation, which sets out the relevant provisions to ensure that the financial interests of the Union budget are protected.

    For example, the Financial Regulation sets out specific rules to ensure that procurement and grant funding from the EU budget respect equal treatment, non-discrimination and transparency.

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/budget/financial-transparency-system/index.html. The annual publications are based on Article 38 of the Financial Regulation (OJ L 2024/2509, 26.9.2024, p. 1-239), and in accordance with the third paragraph of the article, information on recipients is not disclosed in specific cases outlined therein .
    • [2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202402509
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – REGI – Committee vote – 05.05.2025 – Committee on Regional Development

    Source: European Parliament

    20150901PHT91148_width_600.jpg © Votes

    The Committee on Regional Development will vote on the Proposal for a Regulation amending Regulations (EU) 2021/1058 and (EU) 2021/1056 as regards specific measures to address strategic challenges in the context of the mid-term review COM(2025)123 final – 2025/0084 (COD). This is an urgent procedure under Rule 170(5) of the European Parliament Rules of Procedure.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – New legislative framework for products – Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection

    Source: European Parliament

    Renewable energy © AdobeStock

    On 28 April 2025, Rapporteur David Cormand presented the draft report, emphasising the importance of protecting consumers and small businesses from unsafe products and unfair competition, stressing that, quality requirements would ultimately benefit the European market.

    Among the proposed measures were the designation of a new responsible actor within the EU, the broad implementation of the Digital Product Passport (DPP), and the introduction of updated definitions for key sustainability concepts.
    Most political groups welcomed the report and showed their willingness to contribute to its development. S&D supported most of the proposed measures while EPP, PfE, ECR, and ESN expressed concerns about imposing new burdens on businesses and put the focus on improving the standardisation process within the EU. Renew called on the Rapporteur to incorporate the “right to repair” into the report.
    The Commission confirmed that many of the mentioned measures will be in the NLF review process while ensuring the simplification of the existing framework. However, they noted that the review will primarily focus on the legislative template, and that several of the issues raised in the report fall outside its current scope.Public procurement

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Fertilisers – E-000782/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the modification of customs duties applicable to imports of certain goods originating in or exported directly or indirectly from the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus[1] is designed to gradually phase out the EU’s dependence on Russian nitrogen-based fertilisers through a transitional approach.

    This involves measured annual customs duty increases on imports from Russia of such fertilisers over a period of three years, minimising the risk of potential price impacts.

    Its entry into force is dependent on the conclusion of the ordinary legislative procedure currently ongoing in the European Parliament and the Council.

    If the proposal is adopted in its current form, the Commission expects the measure to result in a gradual and orderly replacement of Russian nitrogen-based fertilisers with alternatives, including domestically produced ones, contributing to fair competition in the EU fertilisers market and supporting a stable, long term role of the EU fertilisers industry in ensuring the EU food security.

    For broader background, some fertilisers (potash) from Russia are currently subject to an import quota as part of the sanctions adopted following Russia’s military aggression against Ukraine[2].

    • [1] https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/detail?ref=COM(2025)34&lang=en
    • [2] Article 3(i) of Council Regulation (EU) No 833/2014, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02014R0833-20250225
    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Limited impact of Global Gateway on the African continent – E-001679/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001679/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Benoit Cassart (Renew)

    Launched in 2021, Global Gateway aims to mobilise up to EUR 300 billion in investments by 2027 to finance sustainable infrastructure, promote human development and strengthen global connectivity, in Africa in particular. The aim is to propose an alternative to the Chinese ‘new silk roads’ model, with a focus on democratic values, transparency and sustainability.

    • 1.Can the Commission explain why this strategy is struggling to establish itself as a lever for EU influence in Africa, despite the geographical proximity and pitched ambitions?
    • 2.Does this relative ineffectiveness show that the Commission needs to adopt a more economic and partnership-based model of cooperation, to keep pace with the profound changes taking place on the African continent and the international competition?
    • 3.What action will it take to remedy the slow implementation of this strategy, its lack of visibility, its limited budget given the ambitions (few new funds) and the growing and skewed competition from powers such as China (fewer conditionalities) and Russia, at a time when the African continent is undergoing a major economic and geopolitical transformation?

    Submitted: 25.4.2025

    Last updated: 5 May 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News