Category: European Union

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Physical aggression towards an EU diplomat in Russia and protection measures for EU personnel – E-002471/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002471/2025/rev.1
    to the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy
    Rule 144
    Victor Negrescu (S&D)

    According to information in the international media which has been confirmed by the Commission’s spokesperson, an employee of the Delegation of the EU to the Russian Federation was physically attacked in Vladivostok at the end of May 2025 during an official mission. According to diplomatic sources, the attack was carried out by persons associated, or suspected of being affiliated, with the Russian security services.

    This unprecedentedly serious incident is an unacceptable escalation of the systematic harassment to which European diplomats are subjected in the Russian Federation. This act not only constitutes a flagrant breach of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, but also endangers the safety of European diplomats and directly affects the EU’s ability to maintain a minimal level of institutional dialogue with Russia.

    • 1.What concrete measures have been taken to protect the Romanian diplomat, or are being planned to guarantee the safety of EU diplomats in Russia and other high-risk regions?
    • 2.What official steps have been taken vis-à-vis the Russian authorities in the wake of this serious incident, and what have been the outcomes of the discussions with Russia?
    • 3.Is the European Union prepared to reassess the level of its diplomatic presence in Russia and take firm action, including sanctions, if no credible guarantees of respect for the status of EU personnel are given?

    Submitted: 18.6.2025

    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Report on the Muslim Brotherhood – E-002563/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002563/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sophie Wilmès (Renew), Benoit Cassart (Renew), Urmas Paet (Renew), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Malik Azmani (Renew), Karin Karlsbro (Renew), Sandro Gozi (Renew), Hilde Vautmans (Renew), Lucia Yar (Renew), Nathalie Loiseau (Renew), João Cotrim De Figueiredo (Renew), Petras Auštrevičius (Renew)

    On 21 May 2025, a report requested by the French government entitled ‘The Muslim Brotherhood and Political Islamism in France’ was released.

    Described as ‘damning’ by the French Minister of the Interior, the report highlights the threats posed by the Muslim Brotherhood in France, but also in Europe. Indeed, its influence is exerted through a network of organisations that are often located in close proximity to European institutions, to the point of becoming ‘regular interlocutors’. The report thus highlights a coordinated strategy of foreign interference through digital platforms, calling for increased vigilance to preserve democratic values in Europe. The creation of the ‘Special committee on the European Democracy Shield’ within the European Parliament was precisely intended to address the EU’s shortcomings in the area of malicious interference.

    In this context:

    • 1.How will the Democratic Shield address the threats mentioned in this report?
    • 2.How does the Commission intend to engage in dialogue with the non-EU countries mentioned in relation to their alleged influence in Europe?
    • 3.What tools already exist to counter this foreign interference? Has an assessment been carried out on the implementation and effectiveness of Regulation (EU) 2021/784 on combating the dissemination of terrorist content online?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on preserving the memory of the victims of the post-war communist period in Slovenia – B10-0322/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    B10‑0322/2025

    European Parliament resolution on preserving the memory of the victims of the post-war communist period in Slovenia

    (2025/2575(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to the Treaty on European Union, particularly Article 2 thereof, which upholds respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality and human rights,

     having regard to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and related United Nations resolutions,

     having regard to Resolution 1481 of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe of 26 January 2006 on the need for international condemnation of crimes of totalitarian communist regimes,

     having regard to the Prague Declaration on European Conscience and Communism of 3 June 2008, which calls for Europe-wide condemnation of, and education about, the crimes of communism,

     having regard to its declaration of 23 September 2008 on the proclamation of 23 August as European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism[1],

     having regard to the Vilnius Declaration of the OSCE of July 2009 condemning totalitarianism and supporting the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of Stalinism and Nazism,

     having regard to its resolution of 2 April 2009 on European conscience and totalitarianism[2],

     having regard to the Commission report of 22 December 2010 entitled ‘The memory of the crimes committed by totalitarian regimes in Europe’ (COM(2010)0783),

     having regard to its resolution of 19 September 2019 on the importance of European remembrance for the future of Europe[3],

     having regard to its resolution of 17 January 2024 on European historical consciousness[4],

     having regard to Petition No 0718/2023,

     having regard to Rule 233(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas European history, in all its complexity, should be respected and addressed through an objective, inclusive and evidence-based dialogue that promotes understanding and reconciliation and that should be conducted by professional historians and not be subject to political influence;

    B. whereas preserving the memory of Europe’s tragic past and remembering all victims of totalitarian and authoritarian regimes is essential for honouring the dignity of those victims, promoting reconciliation, human rights and the rule of law, and fostering a culture of peace and mutual respect;

    C. whereas Parliament has adopted a resolution on European consciousness and totalitarianism and has always been committed to preserving the memory of victims of all totalitarian regimes;

    D. whereas the crimes committed during the Second World War in Slovenia and other republics of the former Yugoslavia must never be forgotten;

    E. whereas in the aftermath of the Second World War, more than 100 000 Slovenian residents who resisted the communist system and its ideological repression were victims of violence in various forms; whereas these acts constituted serious violations of fundamental human rights, including the right to life, a fair trial and a decent burial;

    F. whereas tens of thousands of civilians and prisoners of war were extrajudicially executed by the Yugoslav communist regime in Slovenia; whereas in 1945 alone, thousands were executed right after the end of the war;

    G. whereas the Slovenian Government Commission on Concealed Mass Graves has identified over 750 locations of hidden gravesites, revealing a systematic effort to conceal these crimes, yet the places of execution have not been located and the victims have not been properly buried;

    H. whereas mass graves were covered up for decades and public discussion of these crimes was strictly prohibited under the totalitarian regime, thus burying historical truth and hindering the process of reconciliation;

    I. whereas the Slovenian Government abolished the National Day of Remembrance for victims of communist violence in 2023, which represents a serious backward step in efforts to ensure historical justice, reconciliation and respect for victims;

    J. whereas European history should be remembered and discussed objectively, and whereas the victims of the communist massacres in Slovenia therefore deserve remembrance and respect; whereas respect for the historical memory of the victims of all totalitarian regimes contributes to the building of a just and democratic society;

    K. whereas the Slovenian National Assembly passed a law in December 2024 banning the use of symbols of Nazism, fascism and their collaborationist organisations from the Second World War, but not the symbols of communism;

    L. whereas forced labour camps existed in all former Yugoslav republics; whereas these camps were used by the totalitarian communist regime in the country as a tool for suppressing all political opposition;

    1. Takes the view that the memory of crimes committed by totalitarian regimes should form part of the collective memory that makes up modern European history; acknowledges the crimes committed by Nazi, fascist and communist totalitarian regimes and the role these crimes have played in shaping historical perceptions in Europe;

    2. Underlines the importance of including historical facts in educational programmes and history textbooks to ensure that young people understand the importance of democracy and human rights;

    3. Reaffirms its condemnation of all forms of totalitarianism and authoritarianism, including communism, in line with its previous resolutions on historical memory and human rights;

    4. Reaffirms that crimes against humanity have no statute of limitations and should all be judged and handled against the same scale; reaffirms its unequivocal condemnation of historical revisionism and the glorification of Nazi collaborators and other wartime actors responsible for atrocities during and after the Second World War, including the trivialisation of crimes perpetrated by the Nazi and Fascist regimes and their allies, as well as the actions of collaborationist forces and the Yugoslav communist authorities; reiterates the importance of accurate and inclusive historical remembrance that recognises the full scale of totalitarian violence; emphasises the moral responsibility to preserve the memory of all innocent victims of totalitarian and authoritarian regimes in a spirit of reconciliation, truth and democratic values, while rejecting any exploitation of history for political gain and urging continued scholarly engagement with this complex legacy;

    5. Calls for the preservation of the memory of all innocent victims of the communist regime in Slovenia, from its inception to its downfall;

    6. Underlines the importance of the dedicated work taking place on the full disclosure of historical facts, and the continuation of the official investigative mission to uncover the sites of mass graves in Slovenia in order to document and verify historical evidence of crimes committed;

    7. Highlights that many of those responsible for post-war crimes were not held accountable for their actions;

    8. Believes that the victims of Second World War and post-war retribution violence by the Yugoslav communist authorities in Slovenia must be buried properly and with dignity; calls on the Slovenian authorities to continue to do their utmost to guarantee the universal right to burial, and to maintain supporting institutions that contribute to a scholarly and evidence-based understanding of historical events;

    9. Notes that Member States have established memorials to commemorate totalitarian atrocities; calls on Slovenian authorities to continue investigating concealed graves, conduct dignified burials, and establish memorial sites to serve as reminders for future generations;

    10. Reiterates that the official day of remembrance for the millions of victims of totalitarian regimes, known as the European Day of Remembrance for Victims of All Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes, is 23 August;

    11. Stresses the importance of keeping the memory of crimes committed by totalitarian regimes alive, as there can be no reconciliation without remembrance; recalls that remembrance policies fall under the competence of the Member States and therefore do not fall within the scope of EU law; encourages all Member States to actively support remembrance policy projects that foster reconciliation rather than division or political instrumentalisation;

    12. Recalls that the Commission is providing funding under the citizens, equality, rights and values programme to support remembrance actions and research and education projects that reflect on the causes of totalitarian regimes, in particular Nazism, but also fascism, Stalinism and communist regimes, and to commemorate the victims of their crimes;

    13. Believes that a National Day of Remembrance in Slovenia should commemorate victims of authoritarian and totalitarian regimes, including communism, to respect historical justice and contribute to reconciliation;

    14. Calls on the Commission to continue the programme of historical remembrance taking into account all tragedies, to support projects across Europe that address the history of totalitarian crimes, encourage remembrance and serve reconciliation; Reiterates that the crimes of the totalitarian Yugoslav communist regime are not limited to Slovenia and that victims exist in all former Yugoslav republics and autonomous regions;

    15. Calls for a comprehensive examination of the archives of the Yugoslav secret services, in particular KOS and UDBA;

    16. Underlines that all totalitarian regimes should be condemned and that their symbols should not be promoted;

    17. Calls on Slovenia and the other Member States to strive to strengthen historical memory, mutual understanding and reconciliation based on truth and respect for all victims of totalitarian regimes;

    18. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the European Commission, the Council of the European Union, the Slovenian Government and parliament, and the governments and parliaments of the other Member States.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Energy sovereignty and Turkish interference – how is Greece being protected? – E-001887/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The EU has a strategic interest in stability and security in the Eastern Mediterranean and in maintaining a cooperative and mutually beneficial relationship with Türkiye.

    A stable and secure environment in the Eastern Mediterranean requires unequivocal commitment to good neighbourly relations, to international agreements and to the peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance with the United Nations Charter as well as abstaining from unilateral actions that violate international law and the sovereign rights of Member States.

    Türkiye is a candidate country and a key EU partner. In the 2024 enlargement report[1], the Commission emphasised that Türkiye must avoid actions that damage good neighbourly relations and respect the sovereignty of all Member States and their sovereign rights.

    This includes the right to explore and exploit natural resources in accordance with EU and international law, in particular the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

    In its Council Conclusions of December 2024[2], the EU noted the improvements in relations between Greece and Türkiye and expressed its expectations that these improvements will be sustained.

    • [1] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/turkiye-report-2024_en.
    • [2] https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-16983-2024-INIT/en/pdf.
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION – B10-0319/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    pursuant to Rule 131 of the Rules of Procedure

    Gheorghe Piperea, Adrian‑George Axinia, Claudiu‑Richard Târziu, Georgiana Teodorescu, Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza, Fidias Panayiotou, Daniel Obajtek, Ivan David, Patryk Jaki, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Fernand Kartheiser, Nikolaos Anadiotis, Volker Schnurrbusch, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Irmhild Boßdorf, Virginie Joron, Ondřej Dostál, Cristian Terheş, Christine Anderson, António Tânger Corrêa, Emmanouil Fragkos, Milan Mazurek, Alexander Jungbluth, Siegbert Frank Droese, Petar Volgin, Rada Laykova, Stanislav Stoyanov, Arno Bausemer, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Bogdan Rzońca, Milan Uhrík, Mary Khan, Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff, Alexander Sell, René Aust, Petr Bystron, Jacek Ozdoba, Galato Alexandraki, Kosma Złotowski, Waldemar Buda, Tobiasz Bocheński, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Marlena Maląg, Mariusz Kamiński, Dominik Tarczyński, Anna Zalewska, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Maciej Wąsik, Michał Dworczyk, Alvise Pérez, Luis‑Vicențiu Lazarus, Erik Kaliňák, Judita Laššáková, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Ewa Zajączkowska‑Hernik, Jaak Madison, Anja Arndt, Marcin Sypniewski, Markus Buchheit, Filip Turek, Friedrich Pürner, Kateřina Konečná, Ľuboš Blaha, Thierry Mariani, Jan‑Peter Warnke, Thomas Geisel, Branislav Ondruš, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Monika Beňová, Marc Jongen, Nikola Bartůšek, Grzegorz Braun, Sarah Knafo, Petras Gražulis, Piotr Müller, Gerald Hauser

    B10‑0319/2025

    Motion of censure on the Commission by the European Parliament

    (2025/2140(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to Article 17(8) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), Article 234 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Article 106a of the Euratom Treaty,

     having regard to the request submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents[1] by Matina Stevi, a journalist employed by The New York Times, seeking access to all text messages exchanged between President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla between 1 January 2021 and 11 May 2022,

     having regard to the Commission’s refusal of this request on the grounds that it does not possess the requested documents,

     having regard to the judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025, in Case T-36/23 Stevi – The New York Times / Commission[2], which found that the Commission has not given a plausible explanation to justify the non- possession of the requested documents concerning its dealings with Pfizer/BioNTech in the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines and which clarified that the Commission’s duty of transparency is fundamental and that refusal to disclose documents must be strictly justified with compelling reasons,

     having regard to Article 10(3) TEU, which guarantees the right of citizens to participate in the democratic life of the Union and calls for decisions to be taken openly and as closely as possible to the citizen,

     having regard to Rule 131 of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) opened an investigation in 2022 into the European Commission’s conduct in the negotiation and conclusion of COVID-19 vaccine procurement contracts with Pfizer, which remains ongoing as of 2025 and raises credible concerns regarding potential legal and ethical breaches, as well as potential irregularities in the management of Union financial resources;

    B. whereas the General Court of the European Union, in its order of 5 October 2023 in Case T- 36/23, Stevi – The New York Times/ Commission, ruled that the Commission had failed to provide legally sufficient justification for its refusal to disclose the requested documents related to the Pfizer vaccine negotiations;

    C. whereas the Commission contravened its obligations under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 on public access to documents and violated the principles of transparency, good administration, and institutional accountability stipulated in the Treaties;

    D. whereas the Commission allocated EUR 35 billion in public funds for COVID-19 vaccines, yet failed to ensure transparency and accountability, especially as EUR 4 billion worth of doses remained unused, raising serious concerns over financial oversight and administrative failure;

    E. whereas the General Court, in its judgment of 14 May 2025, annulled the European Commission’s decision to deny access to text messages between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, exchanged between 1 January 2021 and 11 May 2022, concerning the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines;

    F. whereas the Court of Auditors, in its Special Report No. 22/2024 adopted on 26 September 2024, identified serious shortcomings in the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), including insufficient linkages between disbursed funds and actual costs, weak verification mechanisms, risks of double funding, and delays in achieving investment targets, raising significant concerns over the Commission’s oversight of one of the largest post-COVID financial instruments;

    G. whereas the Court of Auditors has pointed out that the lack of robust controls and the reliance on self-reporting by Member States increase the risk of double funding’, a situation in which the same actions may be financed multiple times, leading to inefficiencies and potential misuse of funds;

    H. whereas, transparency and accountability are fundamental principles of the Union’s democratic legitimacy, as per Article 10(3) of the TEU, ensuring public trust in the institutions of the European Union, particularly in contexts involving major public health challenges and substantial financial commitments;

    I. whereas, its Committee on Legal Affairs, on 23 April 2025, unanimously adopted a non-binding opinion rejecting the European Commission’s use of Article 122 TFEU as the legal basis for the proposal for a Regulation establishing the Security Action for Europe (SAFE), a EUR 150 billion defence financing initiative;

    J. whereas the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs asserts that the Commission’s invocation of Article 122 TFEU lacks a valid emergency justification, in view of the fact that the provision is intended for short-term measures addressing immediate crises, not for long-term defence investments;

    K. whereas serious concerns have been raised regarding the Commission’s unlawful interference in elections in Member States such as Romania and Germany through a distorted application of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act)[3], which is intended to protect consumers but has been misused to justify vote restrictions and election annulments;

    1. Concludes that the Commission led by President Ursula von der Leyen no longer commands the confidence of Parliament to uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and good governance essential to a democratic Union;

    2. Concludes that the Commission’s unlawful interference in Member States’ elections, via a misapplication of the Digital Services Act, represents a serious breach of its mandate to uphold democratic principles and respect national sovereignty;

    3. Notes that the Commission’s abusive use of Article 122 TFEU as the legal basis for the SAFE Regulation, a EUR 150 billion defence financing initiative, constitutes a serious breach of competence and a distortion of the article’s intended purpose, which is reserved for economic emergency situations;

    4. Considers that this procedural abuse undermines trust in the Union’s institutions and threatens the integrity of the Union’s legal framework;

    5. Calls on the Commission to resign due to repeated failures to ensure transparency and to its persistent disregard for democratic oversight and the rule of law within the Union;

    6. Instructs its President to forward this motion of censure to the President of the Council and the President of the Commission and to notify them of the result of the vote on it in plenary.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Implementation of emergency communication systems – E-002572/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002572/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Pascal Arimont (PPE), Liesbet Sommen (PPE), Željana Zovko (PPE), Andrzej Buła (PPE), Lena Düpont (PPE), Joachim Streit (Renew), Hélder Sousa Silva (PPE), Olivier Chastel (Renew), Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral (PPE), Grégory Allione (Renew)

    The preparedness union strategy stresses the need to strengthen Europe’s crisis resilience through, among other factors, more effective public warning systems. New strategies will only add value if they are implemented by the Member States. Almost five years after the deadline for implementation, eight Member States have not yet fulfilled the EU requirements laid down in the European Electronic Communications Code (EECC) to improve safety during emergencies.

    – Article 109 EECC required Member States to implement advanced caller location by December 2020. Poland, Cyprus and Malta still have not done so.

    – Article 110 EECC required Member States to implement a mobile-based public warning system by June 2022. Ireland, Slovakia, Cyprus, Slovenia, Finland, Latvia and Italy have not implemented such a system.

    Both technologies play a critical role in improving public safety by helping to quickly locate people in need and by allowing civil protection authorities to send people warnings about imminent threats.

    • 1.Does the Commission agree that advanced caller location and mobile-based public warning systems improve public safety and societal resilience?
    • 2.Will the Commission initiate proceedings against the Member States that have not fulfilled their obligations under Articles 109 and 110 EECC?
    • 3.If not, how will the Commission ensure that its future preparedness laws will be implemented effectively if Member States face no consequences for non-compliance?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – EU-UK 2025 Leaders’ Summit: Setting the path for further rapprochement – 03-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Amid Brexit’s negative consequences for the British economy and with the 2024 leadership change in the United Kingdom, the shift towards closer European Union-UK relations has gained momentum. After months of negotiation, the first EU-UK leaders’ summit took place in London on 19 May 2025. Both sides agreed on global priorities of common strategic interest, such as support for multilateralism and Ukraine’s territorial integrity. The parties also established a Security and Defence Partnership, based on biannual structured foreign policy dialogue and consultation mechanisms to facilitate the exchange of information and cooperation. To this end, regular thematic dialogues on a range of security issues will commence. The partnership paves the way for UK participation in the EU’s common joint defence procurement (SAFE initiative). The summit cemented an accord on full reciprocal access to fishing waters until 30 June 2038. The UK and EU also agreed to extend energy cooperation on a permanent basis. Further negotiations will continue, on the youth mobility scheme (including UK participation in Erasmus+), UK participation in the EU’s internal electricity market, linking emission trading systems and establishing a common sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS) area. Many experts see the summit as an important step towards further rapprochement, as the UK indicated willingness to dynamically align some of its laws with the EU legal framework, recognise the authority of the Court of Justice of the EU and cooperate closely on security and defence issues. However, some point to a lack of milestones and solid progress monitoring tools. In numerous resolutions, the European Parliament has called for closer cooperation on trade, security and for UK participation in several EU programmes. Parliament will be involved in scrutinising any implementing legislation and giving or refusing consent if further binding international agreements, such as the SPS area, materialise as a result of the London summit.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Revisiting the GDPR: Lessons from the United Kingdom experience – 03-07-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Momentum is building around data protection reform, with the European Commission proposing targeted changes to ease compliance for small and mid-cap enterprises, and the United Kingdom (UK) adopting broad reforms at its third attempt. The UK’s reform proposals, aimed at boosting economic growth and innovation, focused on reducing administrative burdens, promoting data reuse for research, and facilitating artificial intelligence development. However, critics warned these reforms unduly weaken fundamental rights and jeopardise the UK’s adequacy status with the European Union (EU). As the United States pressures the EU to adopt a more lenient regulatory stance, and industry voices call for a wider review of the General Data Protection Regulation, the UK’s experience offers cautionary lessons. Any broader reform effort that is not carefully designed and fails to account for the public’s strong data protection expectations will likely face significant opposition from civil society.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Suppression of the pride march in Istanbul and backsliding of LGBTQIA+ rights in Türkiye – P-002625/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002625/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Mélissa Camara (Verts/ALE)

    On 29 June 2025, Turkish policy violently dispersed the pride march in Istanbul before arresting at least 50 people, including lawyers and journalists.

    This brutal crackdown is part of an increasingly hostile climate towards LGBTQIA+ people in Türkiye. For a number of months, the Turkish Parliament has been examining bills to ban the ‘promotion of homosexuality’ and restrict content deemed as ‘going against family values’. The bills, which follow similar lines to laws in Russia and Hungary, pose a serious threat to freedom of expression, freedom of association and the principle of non-discrimination.

    Türkiye is both a strategic partner to the EU and a candidate country. Upholding fundamental rights – including the rights of LGBTQIA+ people – must be at the heart of dialogue with the country’s authorities.

    • 1.Does the Commission publicly condemn such repression and legislative abuses?
    • 2.How does the Commission intend to include the protection of LGBTQIA+ rights in its political relations with Türkiye?

    Submitted: 30.6.2025

    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION MOTION OF CENSURE ON THE COMMISSION – B10-0319/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    pursuant to Rule 131 of the Rules of Procedure

    Gheorghe Piperea, Adrian‑George Axinia, Claudiu‑Richard Târziu, Georgiana Teodorescu, Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza, Fidias Panayiotou, Daniel Obajtek, Ivan David, Patryk Jaki, Zsuzsanna Borvendég, Fernand Kartheiser, Nikolaos Anadiotis, Volker Schnurrbusch, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Irmhild Boßdorf, Virginie Joron, Ondřej Dostál, Cristian Terheş, Christine Anderson, António Tânger Corrêa, Emmanouil Fragkos, Milan Mazurek, Alexander Jungbluth, Siegbert Frank Droese, Petar Volgin, Rada Laykova, Stanislav Stoyanov, Arno Bausemer, Arkadiusz Mularczyk, Bogdan Rzońca, Milan Uhrík, Mary Khan, Tomasz Froelich, Hans Neuhoff, Alexander Sell, René Aust, Petr Bystron, Jacek Ozdoba, Galato Alexandraki, Kosma Złotowski, Waldemar Buda, Tobiasz Bocheński, Małgorzata Gosiewska, Marlena Maląg, Mariusz Kamiński, Dominik Tarczyński, Anna Zalewska, Jadwiga Wiśniewska, Maciej Wąsik, Michał Dworczyk, Alvise Pérez, Luis‑Vicențiu Lazarus, Erik Kaliňák, Judita Laššáková, Waldemar Tomaszewski, Ewa Zajączkowska‑Hernik, Jaak Madison, Anja Arndt, Marcin Sypniewski, Markus Buchheit, Filip Turek, Friedrich Pürner, Kateřina Konečná, Ľuboš Blaha, Thierry Mariani, Jan‑Peter Warnke, Thomas Geisel, Branislav Ondruš, Diana Iovanovici Şoşoacă, Monika Beňová, Marc Jongen, Nikola Bartůšek, Grzegorz Braun, Sarah Knafo, Petras Gražulis, Piotr Müller, Gerald Hauser

    B10‑0319/2025

    Motion of censure on the Commission by the European Parliament

    (2025/2140(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to Article 17(8) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), Article 234 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) and Article 106a of the Euratom Treaty,

     having regard to the request submitted under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents[1] by Matina Stevi, a journalist employed by The New York Times, seeking access to all text messages exchanged between President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla between 1 January 2021 and 11 May 2022,

     having regard to the Commission’s refusal of this request on the grounds that it does not possess the requested documents,

     having regard to the judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2025, in Case T-36/23 Stevi – The New York Times / Commission[2], which found that the Commission has not given a plausible explanation to justify the non- possession of the requested documents concerning its dealings with Pfizer/BioNTech in the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines and which clarified that the Commission’s duty of transparency is fundamental and that refusal to disclose documents must be strictly justified with compelling reasons,

     having regard to Article 10(3) TEU, which guarantees the right of citizens to participate in the democratic life of the Union and calls for decisions to be taken openly and as closely as possible to the citizen,

     having regard to Rule 131 of its Rules of Procedure,

    A. whereas the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) opened an investigation in 2022 into the European Commission’s conduct in the negotiation and conclusion of COVID-19 vaccine procurement contracts with Pfizer, which remains ongoing as of 2025 and raises credible concerns regarding potential legal and ethical breaches, as well as potential irregularities in the management of Union financial resources;

    B. whereas the General Court of the European Union, in its order of 5 October 2023 in Case T- 36/23, Stevi – The New York Times/ Commission, ruled that the Commission had failed to provide legally sufficient justification for its refusal to disclose the requested documents related to the Pfizer vaccine negotiations;

    C. whereas the Commission contravened its obligations under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 on public access to documents and violated the principles of transparency, good administration, and institutional accountability stipulated in the Treaties;

    D. whereas the Commission allocated EUR 35 billion in public funds for COVID-19 vaccines, yet failed to ensure transparency and accountability, especially as EUR 4 billion worth of doses remained unused, raising serious concerns over financial oversight and administrative failure;

    E. whereas the General Court, in its judgment of 14 May 2025, annulled the European Commission’s decision to deny access to text messages between Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, exchanged between 1 January 2021 and 11 May 2022, concerning the procurement of COVID-19 vaccines;

    F. whereas the Court of Auditors, in its Special Report No. 22/2024 adopted on 26 September 2024, identified serious shortcomings in the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF), including insufficient linkages between disbursed funds and actual costs, weak verification mechanisms, risks of double funding, and delays in achieving investment targets, raising significant concerns over the Commission’s oversight of one of the largest post-COVID financial instruments;

    G. whereas the Court of Auditors has pointed out that the lack of robust controls and the reliance on self-reporting by Member States increase the risk of double funding’, a situation in which the same actions may be financed multiple times, leading to inefficiencies and potential misuse of funds;

    H. whereas, transparency and accountability are fundamental principles of the Union’s democratic legitimacy, as per Article 10(3) of the TEU, ensuring public trust in the institutions of the European Union, particularly in contexts involving major public health challenges and substantial financial commitments;

    I. whereas, its Committee on Legal Affairs, on 23 April 2025, unanimously adopted a non-binding opinion rejecting the European Commission’s use of Article 122 TFEU as the legal basis for the proposal for a Regulation establishing the Security Action for Europe (SAFE), a EUR 150 billion defence financing initiative;

    J. whereas the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs asserts that the Commission’s invocation of Article 122 TFEU lacks a valid emergency justification, in view of the fact that the provision is intended for short-term measures addressing immediate crises, not for long-term defence investments;

    K. whereas serious concerns have been raised regarding the Commission’s unlawful interference in elections in Member States such as Romania and Germany through a distorted application of Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act)[3], which is intended to protect consumers but has been misused to justify vote restrictions and election annulments;

    1. Concludes that the Commission led by President Ursula von der Leyen no longer commands the confidence of Parliament to uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and good governance essential to a democratic Union;

    2. Concludes that the Commission’s unlawful interference in Member States’ elections, via a misapplication of the Digital Services Act, represents a serious breach of its mandate to uphold democratic principles and respect national sovereignty;

    3. Notes that the Commission’s abusive use of Article 122 TFEU as the legal basis for the SAFE Regulation, a EUR 150 billion defence financing initiative, constitutes a serious breach of competence and a distortion of the article’s intended purpose, which is reserved for economic emergency situations;

    4. Considers that this procedural abuse undermines trust in the Union’s institutions and threatens the integrity of the Union’s legal framework;

    5. Calls on the Commission to resign due to repeated failures to ensure transparency and to its persistent disregard for democratic oversight and the rule of law within the Union;

    6. Instructs its President to forward this motion of censure to the President of the Council and the President of the Commission and to notify them of the result of the vote on it in plenary.

     

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI: RIB Software Recognized as a Leader for Construction Management Software by Independent Research Firm

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Stuttgart, Germany, July 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — STUTTGART, July 3, 2025 – RIB Software, a key provider of construction and BIM software to customers in the AEC industry since its inception in 1961, has been named a Leader in the prestigious 2025 Verdantix Green Quadrant for Construction Management Software (CMS). Recognized for driving innovation and delivering real impact for customers, RIB stands at the forefront of the Leader Quadrant alongside industry players like Autodesk and Procore, but with a distinct focus on solving challenges that matter most to today’s construction professionals.

    The Verdantix Green Quadrant is an independent, evidence-based benchmarking report that evaluates 12 of the world’s most prominent CMS vendors. Based on the proprietary Verdantix Green Quadrant methodology, the evaluation comprised two-and-a-half-hour live product demonstrations with pre-set scenarios, desk research and vendor responses to an 83-point questionnaire covering four technical, five functional and eight market momentum categories. RIB’s inclusion in the Leader quadrant was driven by its strong performance across both product capabilities and market momentum—a reflection of its commitment to helping construction teams build smarter, safer, and more sustainably.

    “This recognition validates our continued efforts to deliver forward-thinking, end-to-end solutions that empower the entire construction value chain from owners, to general contractors and subcontractors, at every stage of a project,” said RIB Software CEO, René Wolf. 

    “It also highlights our unique ability to understand our customers’ real-world challenges and translate them into innovative software solutions that bridge process gaps, drive greater efficiency and sustainability, and enable more transparent, collaborative ways of working. The result is projects that are delivered with stronger margins, higher quality, and greater confidence.”

    Key strengths highlighted in the report include:

    • Robust health and safety compliance functionality
    • Strong field operations and mobile capabilities
    • An extensive solution suite that offers a comprehensive one-stop shop CMS 
    • A clear roadmap for AI, analytics, and 6D BIM innovation

    According to Verdantix, the construction industry is under increasing pressure to overcome productivity challenges, regulatory shifts, and the need for seamless data continuity. RIB’s platform stands out for its ability to unify these complex demands through advanced analytics, mobile-first design, and scalable architecture tailored to diverse project needs.

    This achievement underscores RIB’s position as a strategic technology partner for the global construction industry, driving digital excellence and supporting a safer, more efficient built environment.

    “This recognition from Verdantix reinforces our commitment to raising the bar in compliance and safety across the industry,” Wolf concludes. “We’re proud to lead in this area, helping our customers proactively manage risk, stay ahead of evolving regulations, and achieve measurable sustainability outcomes. But we see this as just the beginning. AI is the next frontier in construction technology, and we’re fully committed to bringing its potential to life for our customers. Our goal is to be the leading AI partner in AEC, delivering intelligent, connected solutions that truly transform how projects are planned, built, and delivered.” 

    About RIB Software

    Driven by transformative digital technologies and trends, RIB is committed to propelling the industry forward and making engineering and construction more efficient and sustainable.

    Throughout its 60+ year history, the business has expanded its global footprint to incorporate more than 550,000 users and 2,300 talents, with the vision of transforming the operation into a worldwide powerhouse and providing innovative software solutions to its core markets.

    Managing the entire project lifecycle, from planning and construction, to operation and maintenance, RIB connects people, processes and data in innovative ways to ensure its customers always complete projects within budget, on time and to high quality, while reducing their carbon footprints. 

    RIB Software is a proud Schneider Electric company. 

    For more information, please visit: www.rib-software.com.

    About Verdantix

    Verdantix is an independent research and advisory firm that serves a global client base consisting of the world’s most innovative corporations, technology and services vendors, and investors. Our insights and analysis form a foundation of the most granular data available in the marketplaces we serve. This allows us to make highly accurate far-reaching forecasts and big-picture predictions that business leaders depend on when they are setting out to reach their most important goals. verdantix.com

    Media Contact

    Kim Immelman

    Global Marketing Leader

    kim.immelman@rib-software.com 

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – COVID-19 vaccines: French contribution to financing doses for Spain (EUR 400 million?) – E-002574/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002574/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Virginie Joron (PfE)

    The Commission has refused to specify how many COVID-19 vaccine doses were purchased only to be destroyed[1]. ‘[T]he Commission secured a maximum amount of up to 4.6 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines in agreement with and on behalf of the Member States, without requiring them to commit to purchasing this maximum amount.’ Yet less than a billion doses were actually administered.

    According to the European Commission, the European Regional Development Fund was mobilised by different Spanish regions (around EUR 2 billion), as well as Lisbon (EUR 238 million) and Estonia (EUR 52 million) to finance the purchase of vaccine doses up until the end of December 2023 and carry out communication campaigns[2]. EU funds did not directly finance these doses, but the EU partners contributed 100 % in each case.

    Considering that no similar information has been found for France or other countries on the European Commission’s website:

    • 1.Which other EU countries financed their purchases of COVID-19 vaccines with European regional funds or other EU instruments?
    • 2.How many doses were financed by European regional funds in 2023, when the pandemic officially ended in spring 2022?
    • 3.Has the Commission checked whether the doses paid for with EU funds but not delivered were produced by Pfizer?

    Submitted: 25.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2023-003364_EN.html
    • [2] https://kohesio.ec.europa.eu/en/projects?sort=Total-Budget-(descending)&keywords=vaccine&page=3;https:%2F%2Fkohesio.ec.europa.eu%2Ffr%2Fprojets%2FQ4687090; https://kohesio.ec.europa.eu/en/projects/Q4485013; https://kohesio.ec.europa.eu/en/projects/Q4485013; https://kohesio.ec.europa.eu/en/projects/Q4687136; https://kohesio.ec.europa.eu/en/projects/Q4687099; https://kohesio.ec.europa.eu/en/projects/Q6860901; Andalusia (EUR 322 228 930 and EUR 44 731 652), Barcelona (EUR 293 927 550 and EUR 40 802 868), Madrid (EUR 255 179 120 and EUR 35 423 830)[2], Lisbon (EUR 238 684 490) and Estonia (EUR 52 767 804)
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Commission’s assessment of illegal charges relating to the Takata recall in Cyprus – P-002619/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002619/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Giorgos Georgiou (The Left)

    In his reply (P-001974/2025[1]) of 26 June 2025, Commission Vice-President Séjourné underlines that Regulation (EU) 2023/988 on general product safety reinforces and introduces new and more stringent obligations for economic operators on, inter alia, product safety recalls and the right of consumers to cost-free, timely and effective remedies.

    However, in our question of 16 May 2025 we made clear reference to recorded infringements committed by two representatives of manufacturing companies, who were indirectly passing on the cost of repairs by charging for mandatory diagnostic tests prior to replacement.

    What is the state of play as regards the assessment of compliance with EU legislation and the structured dialogue with the Republic of Cyprus referred to by the Commission?

    Submitted: 30.6.2025

    • [1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-10-2025-001974-ASW_EN.html
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Kenya’s largest hospital gets EIB Global support to bolster and green its energy supply

    Source: European Investment Bank

    EIB

    The European Investment Bank’s development arm (EIB Global) will help Kenya’s largest hospital expand and green its energy supply. EIB Global will advise Kenyatta National Hospital in Nairobi on the installation of a solar-power system.

    The goal of the project is to meet growing demand for electricity at the hospital while increasing its energy independence and reducing its carbon footprint.

    EIB Global will offer the assistance in partnership with German development agency (GIZ) through a grant of 7.3 million Kenyan shillings (€50,000) from a multi-donor initiative run by the World Bank and EIB for cities – the Cities Climate Finance Gap Fund. The support will cover technical studies and a financial assessment regarding the planned installation of the photovoltaic (PV) system.

    The hospital, which is also the largest public health centre in East Africa, has a capacity of 2,400 beds and serves about 2 million patients annually. High grid costs in Kenya are straining the budget of the hospital and power outages are forcing it to rely on diesel generators that meet only about 65% of demand, leaving critically ill patients at risk.

    “Our goal is a climate smart future,” said EIB Regional Hub for East Africa Head Edward Claessen.  “We are committed to supporting Kenyatta National Hospital in its transition to green electricity. The forthcoming technical studies will lay the ground for successful implementation of the PV system.”

    Under the support agreement, GIZ experts will carry out the technical and financial evaluations for implementation and maintenance of the solar-power system.

    Kenyatta National Hospital intends to direct savings on energy bills resulting from the planned PV system to areas such as purchasing medical supplies, hiring more staff and upgrading facilities.

    “We are grateful to the European Investment Bank, GIZ and the City Climate Finance Gap Fund for their support through this technical assistance programme,” said Kenyatta National Hospital Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Evanson Kamuri. “This collaboration marks a significant step forward in our commitment to sustainable healthcare delivery. By integrating energy efficiency and climate-smart solutions, Kenyatta National Hospital is not only enhancing operational resilience but also setting a benchmark for environmentally responsible healthcare infrastructure in the region.”

    The EIB Global and GIZ support will lead to concrete recommendations to the hospital on attaining reliable and efficient power supply through the planned PV system. The studies will assess the hospital’s current energy-consumption patterns, evaluate the feasibility of integrating the planned PV system into the hospital power grid, provide financial modelling for installation and maintenance and address regulatory questions.

    The European Investment Bank, through the Cities Climate Gap Fund support cities in the early stages of project development by assessing the actual challenges, understanding the risks and designing fit-for-purpose solutions that resonate with their goals for a climate- smart future.

    Background information

    About EIB Global

    The European Investment Bank (ElB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. It finances investments that contribute to EU policy objectives.  

    EIB Global is the EIB Group’s specialised arm devoted to increasing the impact of international partnerships and development finance, and a key partner of Global Gateway. EIB Global aims to support €100 billion of investment by the end of 2027 — around one-third of the overall target of this EU initiative. Within Team Europe, EIB Global fosters strong, focused partnerships alongside fellow development finance institutions and civil society. EIB Global brings the EIB Group closer to people, companies and institutions through offices across the world. High-quality, up-to-date photos of the organisation’s headquarters for media use are available here.

    About Gap Fund:

    The Cities Climate Finance Gap Fund is a multi-donor fund, implemented by the World Bank and the EIB in collaboration with GIZ and other city networks. Gap Fund provides much-needed funding for early-stage technical assistance and capacity building so that cities from low- and middle-income countries can operationalise their climate action plans, develop robust project concepts, and access climate finance resources. Since its establishment in 2020, it has supported 183 cities in 67 countries.

    On 20 September 2023, the governments of Germany and Luxembourg announced new funding of € 50 million  for the City Climate Finance Gap Fund (Gap Fund) with an additional €5 million on the horizon, these resources will support the development of low-carbon and climate-resilient urban investments and will nearly double the fund’s capitalization, bringing it to €105 million, making it one of the largest early-stage technical assistance funds for cities and climate.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: AMENDMENTS 001-002 – REPORT on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Austria, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Moldova relating to floods occurred in September 2024 and Bosnia and Herzegovina relating to floods occurred in October 2024 – A10-0114/2025(001-002)

    Source: European Parliament

    AMENDMENTS 001-002
    REPORT
    on the proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council on the mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund to provide assistance to Austria, Poland, Czechia, Slovakia and Moldova relating to floods occurred in September 2024 and Bosnia and Herzegovina relating to floods occurred in October 2024
    (COM(2025)0250 – C10-0102/2025 – 2025/0138(BUD))
    Committee on Budgets
    Rapporteur: Andrzej Halicki

    Source : © European Union, 2025 – EP

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: AMENDMENTS 007-007 – REPORT containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark – A10-0103/2025(007-007)

    Source: European Parliament

    AMENDMENTS 007-007
    REPORT
    containing a motion for a non-legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion, on behalf of the European Union, of the Implementing Protocol (2025-2030) to the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of Greenland and the Government of Denmark
    (COM(2024)0479 – C10-0227/2024 – 2024/0263M(NLE))
    Committee on Fisheries
    Rapporteur: Emma Fourreau

    Source : © European Union, 2025 – EP

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Strategic approach to animal rights extremism – E-002606/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002606/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Sander Smit (PPE)

    Violent animal rights activism against livestock farmers and food companies is on the rise in the Netherlands and in Europe more generally, resulting in intimidation, violent occupations and arson. Recently, a large-scale suspected arson took place in Blokker, where nine trucks were deliberately set on fire. Shortly afterwards, somebody entered the yard of a Dutch MP and property was defaced. Similar incidents include the violent home invasion and intimidating break-in at the farm of the prospective German agriculture minister Günther Felßner (2025), the arson attack at a duck slaughterhouse in Ermelo (2023) and the violent occupation of a pigsty in Boxtel (2019). These attacks cause significant material and psychological damage to farming families. Despite alarming signals from the Dutch Platform Veilig Ondernemen (PVO) about an increase in intimidation targeting farmers and perpetrated by animal rights extremists, official EU registration of these incidents is conspicuous by its absence.

    • 1.Does the European Commission recognise the seriousness of animal rights extremism and, given the use of violence and intimidation to achieve political goals, does it classify these actions as terrorist attacks?
    • 2.What concrete measures is the European Commission taking to detect and tackle networks of animal rights extremists operating across borders within the Union?
    • 3.Is the Commission prepared, in cooperation with Europol and the Member States, to map the threat of extremist animal rights activism, including by setting up an EU hotline?

    Supporter[1]

    Submitted: 27.6.2025

    • [1] This question is supported by a Member other than the author: Jessika Van Leeuwen (PPE)
    Last updated: 3 July 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Eritrea: Activities to Share Experiences of Successful Youth

    Source: APO


    .

    The Eritrean community in Sweden organized a program in Stockholm aimed at transferring the experiences of successful Eritrean youth.

    The program, conducted by the Eritrean community in Husby-Kista-Akalla under the theme “From Asmara to Husby,” sought to showcase the efforts and achievements of Eritrean youth in education, nationalism, and the preservation of their culture and identity.

    Mr. Yonas Tesfay noted that, thanks to the relentless efforts of the Eritrean communities, many youths have succeeded in various professions—including research, medicine, engineering, computer technology, banking, sports, politics, and the arts. He added that efforts will continue to expand similar initiatives to all Eritrean communities.

    During the event, several professionals shared their experiences, including Dr. Haben Mogos: Ms. Sabela Temesgen, innovation and investment expert; Ms. Simona Abraham, television production expert; Mr. Simon Mateos, artist; Mr. Paulos Yohannes, athlete; Mr. Tedros Goitom, film editing expert; and Mr. Dejen Meles.

    Founding members of the Husby-Kista-Akalla community, Mr. Gebrehiwet Abraham and Priest Ezra Gebremedhin also provided briefings on the establishment of the community, the stages it has passed through, and the benefits of communal gatherings in fostering nationalism.

    Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Ministry of Information, Eritrea.

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Culbokie ELC rated very good in latest Care Inspectorate Inspection report

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    The Highland Council welcomes the positive Care Inspectorate Inspection report following a recent unannounced inspection visit to Culbokie Primary School Nursery, Dingwall.

    Following the inspection, Culbokie Primary School Nursery received the following:

    • How good is our care, play and learning? – 5 Very Good
    • How good is our setting? –  5 Very Good
    • How good is our leadership? – 5 Very Good
    • How good is our staff team – 5 Very Good

    Education Committee Chair, Cllr John Finlayson said: “The recent unannounced inspection at Culbokie Primary School Nursery from the Care Inspectorate received an outstanding report, reflecting the professionalism, dedication and commitment of the caring staff at the setting to create an inclusive, safe and nurturing ethos for all pupils attending.

    “The report found significant strengths in aspects of the care provided and how these supported positive outcomes for children, the child centred approach by all staff, with supportive and highly skilled leadership and robust quality assurance processes that enable Culbokie Nursery to deliver high quality care and support tailored to meet children’s and families’ needs.

    “I’d like to congratulate the staff at Culbokie Primary School Nursery for their continued dedication and ‘full marks’ inspection report.”

    Key messages from the report:

    Staff were warm, caring and nurturing in their approaches to support children. As a result, children felt confident and secure.

    • Staff use skilled interactions to support children’s developing early literacy, language and numeracy skills.
    • The nursery was warm and welcoming, and furnished to a high standard which gave children a strong message that they mattered.
    • Robust quality assurance processes allowed focussed and meaningful opportunities for the manager and staff to review and monitor various aspects of the service.
    • The staff team had high aspirations for all children, and this was evident in the care and support they received, in both nursery and breakfast club settings.

    3 Jul 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Reflecting on the success of the “Sharing Food, Sharing Languages” event

    Source: Scotland – Highland Council

    “Sharing Food, Sharing Languages” – an event organised by the Highland Council’s Adult Learning team in partnership with migrant and refugee learning communities – successfully took place at Eden Court, Inverness on 22 June on the concluding day of Refugee Week Scotland (13-22 June).

    Refugee Week Scotland is the largest arts and culture festival, celebrating the contributions, creativity and resilience of refugees and people seeking sanctuary.

    The event brought together over 200 people from New Scots and host Communities to celebrate “milestones”, the theme for this year’s event.  The key purpose was to promote diversity and cross-cultural understanding and connect people through shared interests and passions. It also provided a platform to ensure marginalised communities could express themselves through art.

    Learners were able to showcase their diverse skills, expertise, history and culture. Voices were heard and represented through stories, song and poetry.  

    Participants were invited to take part in creative workshops including Ukrainian embroidery and the art of writing different scripts. There were unique language tasters led by native speakers of Pashto, Dari, Arabic, Ukrainian and Turkish and a multicultural Storytime for families.

    Wonderful performances from Cheryl Heggie’s Highland dancers and Mriya Ukrainian Childrens’ Choir, from Aberdeen, created a rich immersive cultural experience.

    To top it all off, there were delicious traditional dishes to try from Ukraine, Eritrea, South Sudan and Afghanistan.

    Lucy McGlennon, Head of Engagement at Eden Court said:  “Sharing Food, Sharing Languages” was a fantastic event and we are delighted to have been in a position to support it.  Eden Court is for everyone, and it is important to us that people of all cultures feel that they are welcome here.  It was a moment of great pride to see so many cultures represented through delicious foods, national dress and through song, dance and poetry.”

    Highland Council Learning for Life, part of the Community Learning and Development, supports adult learning activities which help with everyday skills such as reading, writing, using numbers, English as second language and digital literacy. All activities are learner-centred and learner-led.

    To find out more contact Kirsty.Dambrosio@highland.gov.uk

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Secretary-General Appoints Carlos G. Ruiz Massieu of Mexico Special Representative for Haiti, Integrated Office Chief

    Source: United Nations General Assembly and Security Council

    United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres announced today the appointment of Carlos G. Ruiz Massieu of Mexico as his new Special Representative for Haiti and Head of the United Nations Integrated Office in Haiti (BINUH).  He succeeds María Isabel Salvador of Ecuador, to whom the Secretary-General is grateful for her dedication and service.

    Mr. Ruiz Massieu brings to this position over 30 years of experience in public service and diplomacy, both in bilateral and multilateral contexts.  As Special Representative of the Secretary-General in Colombia since 2019, he led the United Nations Verification Mission in Colombia, monitoring the implementation of the Peace Agreement between the Government of Colombia and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia–People’s Army (FARC-EP) guerrilla.  He provided good offices and political leadership in the recent peace dialogues of the Government of Colombia and the National Liberation Army, as well as with other illegal armed groups.  Prior to this assignment, he served as the Chairperson of the General Assembly’s Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions from 2013 to 2018.

    A distinguished career diplomat, Mr. Ruiz Massieu served in different positions in the Mexican Government prior to joining the United Nations, including at the Permanent Mission of Mexico to the United Nations.  Mr. Ruiz Massieu is a graduate in law from the Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, and holds a Master of Arts in politics from the University of Essex in the United Kingdom, with a focus on Latin America.  In addition to Spanish, he speaks English and French.

    __________

    * This supersedes Press Release SG/A/1844-BIO/5164 of 10 December 2018.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI: Wealth Megatrends Releases 2025 Forecast Update on Gold Prediction Amid Historic Surge in Central Bank Demand

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Palm Beach Gardens, July 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION

    The gold market has re-entered a cycle of historic attention as macroeconomic uncertainty accelerates worldwide. In early 2025, gold prices surged beyond $3,200 per ounce for the first time on record, prompting a surge in online interest, independent forecasts, and portfolio reassessments. This surge can be attributed to factors such as recent tariff escalations, currency reallocation by foreign governments, and geopolitical fragmentation, which have amplified concerns about the long-term stability of fiat systems. Simultaneously, capital outflows and bond yield distortions have complicated traditional wealth preservation strategies. Many investors, both institutional and retail, are actively revisiting gold as a potential counterbalance to portfolio risk, particularly in light of rising stagflation narratives.

    This trend is rooted in increasingly visible disruptions across both U.S. and international markets. Recent tariff escalations, currency reallocation by foreign governments, and geopolitical fragmentation have amplified concerns about the long-term stability of fiat systems. Simultaneously, capital outflows and bond yield distortions have complicated traditional wealth preservation strategies. Many investors, both institutional and retail, are actively revisiting gold as a potential counterbalance to portfolio risk, particularly in light of rising stagflation narratives.

    Gold’s long-term historical performance, a key factor in its investment potential, continues to draw analytical interest. Since 2000, the metal has averaged over 20% annualized returns in periods of monetary dislocation, with only four annual declines in the past 25 years. This statistical consistency has aligned with peak search periods around previous crises, including the 2008 financial collapse, the 2020 pandemic response, and inflation spikes of the 1970s, providing reassurance to potential investors.

    As the dollar weakens and equity markets exhibit erratic momentum, digital conversations have also expanded beyond physical gold. Investor attention is turning toward ancillary market sectors with cyclical ties to the price of gold, specifically gold mining equities, royalty streaming models, and historically correlated commodities. In response to this emerging wave of interest, financial analysts and newsletter platforms have begun re-evaluating the long-term implications of sustained gold appreciation under current monetary and geopolitical conditions.

    To explore the full gold forecast and related analysis from Sean Brodrick, visit the Wealth Megatrends research platform at: www.weissratings.com.

    SECTION 2 – COMPANY / PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT

    In its latest macroeconomic outlook, Wealth Megatrends, backed by the highly respected and seasoned precious metals researcher Sean Brodrick, has released an updated analysis. His projection of a potential rise in gold prices to $6,900 per ounce—more than double current levels-is a significant milestone in the gold market. This projection, based on more than two decades of field-based research across global mining markets, follows gold’s recent break past $3,200, a milestone Brodrick had publicly projected following key shifts in post-election market dynamics and intensifying global trade disruptions.

    Brodrick’s projections are informed by more than two decades of field-based research across global mining markets. They are developed in collaboration with Weiss Ratings, an independent financial analysis firm known for its longstanding data-driven forecasting models. Founded nearly a century ago, Weiss Ratings has established a reputation for identifying risk-adjusted investment trends early in their cycle across multiple sectors, including commodities. Wealth Megatrends, on the other hand, is a leading authority in macroeconomic trends and has a track record of accurate forecasts in the precious metals market.

    The latest gold outlook presented through Wealth Megatrends is framed within the broader thesis that structural volatility—driven by tariffs, debt accumulation, and rising capital flight—may continue to pressure fiat currencies and redirect both institutional and sovereign interest toward hard assets. Within that narrative, Brodrick identifies gold’s current trajectory as part of a long-form secular cycle, where historical comparisons to the 1970s, early 2000s, and post-2008 recovery periods offer a relevant benchmark.

    The forecast does not focus solely on bullion pricing. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of understanding how gold-related equities—specifically gold mining stocks—have historically shown outsized performance during similar macroeconomic phases. While physical gold has traditionally served as a wealth preservation tool, equities tied to its production have demonstrated the potential for amplified movement, often reflecting operational leverage and commodity price elasticity. This comprehensive view of the market, providing a holistic understanding, is crucial for investors seeking to maximize their returns and feel prepared for their investment decisions.

    Wealth Megatrends positions this update as part of its ongoing commitment to transparency in informational research within the investment landscape. All perspectives are based on publicly observable market behavior, historical analogs, and forward-looking interpretations of supply-demand dislocations currently underway in the precious metals ecosystem. This commitment ensures that our audience can trust the information we provide.

    SECTION 3 – TREND ANALYSIS / CONSUMER INTEREST

    As uncertainty continues to shape global markets, search behavior and investor sentiment have undergone a noticeable shift. Interest in “gold forecast,” “gold prediction 2025,” and “how to invest in gold mining stocks” has surged across digital platforms. Concurrently, investment forums, macroeconomic newsletters, and institutional reports have intensified their coverage of gold and related asset classes, driven by elevated concerns over inflation, currency depreciation, and geopolitical fragmentation.

    Beyond retail curiosity, sovereign actors are playing an increasingly visible role in gold market dynamics. According to international financial reporting, global central banks have significantly increased their gold reserves over the last five years, with holdings reaching multi-decade highs. Nations such as China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Hungary have expanded their stockpiles, while institutions like the IMF have noted a material decline in U.S. dollar reserve dominance. This broader pivot toward physical gold reflects a growing skepticism toward traditional currency systems, particularly after recent asset seizures and shifting global monetary policies.

    At the same time, prominent hedge fund managers and macro investors have reportedly rotated capital into precious metals and resource equities. Though motivations vary—from protection against dollar volatility to long-term diversification—the directional trend suggests a shared expectation of continued financial instability. These evolving behaviors have contributed to an ecosystem where gold-related content now performs at record engagement levels across both news outlets and investment research platforms.

    Notably, the discourse is also expanding beyond bullion. Mining stocks, streaming firms, and gold-sector ETFs have re-emerged in public conversations due to their historical pattern of outperforming the underlying metal during bull cycles. This pattern, often tied to operational leverage and production scalability, is once again being evaluated by market analysts seeking exposure to gold-aligned opportunities without the logistical or storage limitations of physical assets.

    Additional insights into long-cycle gold behavior, macro trends, and equity exposure models are available through the Wealth Megatrends monthly publication, produced by Weiss Ratings.

    SECTION 4 – TECHNOLOGY SPOTLIGHT

    Within the broader conversation about gold’s long-term role in financial strategy, renewed interest is emerging in an adjacent category: publicly traded gold mining companies. Historically, these companies have moved directionally with the price of gold but have shown the potential for outsized volatility—both upward and downward—due to the inherent operating leverage tied to commodity prices.

    Mining equities represent businesses engaged in the extraction, production, and refinement of gold, often operating across geographically diverse sites. Their revenue models are influenced not only by prevailing spot prices but also by internal efficiencies, fixed operating costs, jurisdictional stability, and resource scalability. This makes them a subject of focused interest for market analysts seeking to interpret how rising gold prices might impact corporate financial performance within the sector.

    In previous gold bull markets—such as those seen in the 1970s, early 2000s, and post-2008—specific gold mining equities exhibited exponential price action relative to the metal itself. This pattern, commonly attributed to margin expansion, arises when rising gold prices exceed fixed production costs. While the price of gold may increase incrementally, the profitability of certain miners can shift more dramatically under favorable conditions, depending on operational factors such as grade, jurisdiction, and scale of output.

    Recent digital commentary also reflects growing awareness of gold mining sub-sectors, including royalty and streaming companies. These entities do not engage directly in mining but instead finance producers in exchange for a fixed share of production, often at below-market rates. As a result, they tend to operate with reduced overhead and exposure, while still participating in the broader gold cycle.

    SECTION 5 – USER JOURNEY NARRATIVE / MARKET RECEPTION

    Public conversation around gold has shifted dramatically in recent quarters, with online forums, financial publications, and independent research platforms documenting a growing reappraisal of gold’s long-term role in diversified strategies. Once considered a niche or defensive holding, gold is increasingly being positioned by investors as a foundational asset in the face of mounting systemic uncertainty.

    The transition in tone—from peripheral interest to mainstream reconsideration—has coincided with several economic flashpoints. These include the recalibration of central bank policies, persistent inflation indicators, and pronounced volatility in both equity and fixed-income markets. As global confidence in fiat stability continues to waver, discourse around asset preservation has taken on new urgency. In this environment, physical gold is commonly cited as a symbolic safeguard, while gold-linked equities are being explored for their cyclical performance dynamics.

    This renewed attention is not limited to physical asset holders. Retail investors who previously focused on conventional equities or index strategies are now engaging with educational content around gold mining companies, royalty models, and global production footprints. Meanwhile, institutional portfolios have been observed increasing their allocations to tangible asset categories, sometimes through passive vehicles that provide exposure to diversified gold equity baskets.

    Notably, this shift in tone is not driven solely by performance metrics but by a broader cultural narrative about financial resilience, global realignment, and the search for assets that exist outside centralized systems.

    Wealth Megatrends is a subscription-based research newsletter published monthly by Weiss Ratings. It provides economic cycle analysis for informational purposes only.

    SECTION 6 – AVAILABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY

    Readers seeking additional context on gold market cycles, equity sector dynamics, or commodity-aligned investment frameworks can find expanded analysis in the Wealth Megatrends publication. The platform is designed to offer economic research and independent forecasting centered around macroeconomic cycles, resource asset classes, and long-term portfolio theory.

    All materials are presented for informational purposes only and are developed using a combination of historical market analysis, third-party data synthesis, and independent evaluation of publicly available company performance metrics. No materials constitute financial advice or investment guidance. Instead, Wealth Megatrends content is intended to support educational exploration for individuals seeking to understand the structural drivers behind evolving market behavior.

    SECTION 7 – FINAL OBSERVATIONS & INDUSTRY CONTEXT

    The renewed momentum behind gold and gold-aligned equities reflects a broader shift in investor expectations across global markets. What began as a defensive reaction to short-term economic stressors has evolved into a long-term reassessment of value preservation frameworks and asset decentralization strategies. Within this environment, commodities such as gold and, by extension, mining sector exposure have re-emerged as central discussion points in the allocation strategies of both institutional and individual investors.

    The movement is not isolated to metals alone. It parallels a growing trend toward so-called “clean-label assets”—investments perceived as tangible, auditable, and less reliant on third-party counterparty risk. This shift mirrors consumer demand in other sectors, where transparency, operational integrity, and verifiable origin are increasingly prioritized over yield projections or promotional narratives.

    As global policy tools face scrutiny and traditional diversification models come under pressure, the precious metals space may continue to serve as both a barometer and a response mechanism to macroeconomic volatility.

    SECTION 8 – PUBLIC COMMENTARY THEME SUMMARY

    Public commentary surrounding the current gold cycle reflects a diverse mix of enthusiasm, skepticism, and inquiry. A recurring theme among bullish observers is the belief that structural global instability—encompassing monetary policy and geopolitical shifts—has triggered a renewed case for gold as a long-term asset.

    At the same time, some participants express concern over the potential for near-term overvaluation. A recurring discussion point involves the pace of recent gains and whether market enthusiasm may be outpacing underlying supply-demand fundamentals.

    Discussions across digital channels also reflect an evolving understanding of how gold-related equities behave differently from physical bullion. Some have noted that while gold mining stocks can amplify exposure to the metal’s price, they may also introduce operational, jurisdictional, or liquidity risks not present in the physical commodity itself.

    Another frequently cited theme involves the role of silver and other precious metals within the current narrative. Some market observers have expressed curiosity about whether these secondary metals will follow gold’s trajectory or establish differentiated cycles based on industrial demand and production forecasts.

    ABOUT THE COMPANY

    Founded to help investors navigate complex economic cycles, Wealth Megatrends is a monthly research publication that provides independent, data-driven analysis across precious metals, energy, and global resource sectors. Veteran cycles analyst Sean Brodrick leads the newsletter and is part of the Weiss Ratings ecosystem, a firm originally established in 1971 and known for its transparent approach to financial modeling and risk assessment.

    The publication does not provide investment advice, treatment, or diagnostic services and is intended strictly for educational and informational purposes.

    Contact:

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Wealth Megatrends Releases 2025 Forecast Update on Gold Prediction Amid Historic Surge in Central Bank Demand

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Palm Beach Gardens, July 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    SECTION 1 – INTRODUCTION

    The gold market has re-entered a cycle of historic attention as macroeconomic uncertainty accelerates worldwide. In early 2025, gold prices surged beyond $3,200 per ounce for the first time on record, prompting a surge in online interest, independent forecasts, and portfolio reassessments. This surge can be attributed to factors such as recent tariff escalations, currency reallocation by foreign governments, and geopolitical fragmentation, which have amplified concerns about the long-term stability of fiat systems. Simultaneously, capital outflows and bond yield distortions have complicated traditional wealth preservation strategies. Many investors, both institutional and retail, are actively revisiting gold as a potential counterbalance to portfolio risk, particularly in light of rising stagflation narratives.

    This trend is rooted in increasingly visible disruptions across both U.S. and international markets. Recent tariff escalations, currency reallocation by foreign governments, and geopolitical fragmentation have amplified concerns about the long-term stability of fiat systems. Simultaneously, capital outflows and bond yield distortions have complicated traditional wealth preservation strategies. Many investors, both institutional and retail, are actively revisiting gold as a potential counterbalance to portfolio risk, particularly in light of rising stagflation narratives.

    Gold’s long-term historical performance, a key factor in its investment potential, continues to draw analytical interest. Since 2000, the metal has averaged over 20% annualized returns in periods of monetary dislocation, with only four annual declines in the past 25 years. This statistical consistency has aligned with peak search periods around previous crises, including the 2008 financial collapse, the 2020 pandemic response, and inflation spikes of the 1970s, providing reassurance to potential investors.

    As the dollar weakens and equity markets exhibit erratic momentum, digital conversations have also expanded beyond physical gold. Investor attention is turning toward ancillary market sectors with cyclical ties to the price of gold, specifically gold mining equities, royalty streaming models, and historically correlated commodities. In response to this emerging wave of interest, financial analysts and newsletter platforms have begun re-evaluating the long-term implications of sustained gold appreciation under current monetary and geopolitical conditions.

    To explore the full gold forecast and related analysis from Sean Brodrick, visit the Wealth Megatrends research platform at: www.weissratings.com.

    SECTION 2 – COMPANY / PRODUCT ANNOUNCEMENT

    In its latest macroeconomic outlook, Wealth Megatrends, backed by the highly respected and seasoned precious metals researcher Sean Brodrick, has released an updated analysis. His projection of a potential rise in gold prices to $6,900 per ounce—more than double current levels-is a significant milestone in the gold market. This projection, based on more than two decades of field-based research across global mining markets, follows gold’s recent break past $3,200, a milestone Brodrick had publicly projected following key shifts in post-election market dynamics and intensifying global trade disruptions.

    Brodrick’s projections are informed by more than two decades of field-based research across global mining markets. They are developed in collaboration with Weiss Ratings, an independent financial analysis firm known for its longstanding data-driven forecasting models. Founded nearly a century ago, Weiss Ratings has established a reputation for identifying risk-adjusted investment trends early in their cycle across multiple sectors, including commodities. Wealth Megatrends, on the other hand, is a leading authority in macroeconomic trends and has a track record of accurate forecasts in the precious metals market.

    The latest gold outlook presented through Wealth Megatrends is framed within the broader thesis that structural volatility—driven by tariffs, debt accumulation, and rising capital flight—may continue to pressure fiat currencies and redirect both institutional and sovereign interest toward hard assets. Within that narrative, Brodrick identifies gold’s current trajectory as part of a long-form secular cycle, where historical comparisons to the 1970s, early 2000s, and post-2008 recovery periods offer a relevant benchmark.

    The forecast does not focus solely on bullion pricing. Instead, it emphasizes the importance of understanding how gold-related equities—specifically gold mining stocks—have historically shown outsized performance during similar macroeconomic phases. While physical gold has traditionally served as a wealth preservation tool, equities tied to its production have demonstrated the potential for amplified movement, often reflecting operational leverage and commodity price elasticity. This comprehensive view of the market, providing a holistic understanding, is crucial for investors seeking to maximize their returns and feel prepared for their investment decisions.

    Wealth Megatrends positions this update as part of its ongoing commitment to transparency in informational research within the investment landscape. All perspectives are based on publicly observable market behavior, historical analogs, and forward-looking interpretations of supply-demand dislocations currently underway in the precious metals ecosystem. This commitment ensures that our audience can trust the information we provide.

    SECTION 3 – TREND ANALYSIS / CONSUMER INTEREST

    As uncertainty continues to shape global markets, search behavior and investor sentiment have undergone a noticeable shift. Interest in “gold forecast,” “gold prediction 2025,” and “how to invest in gold mining stocks” has surged across digital platforms. Concurrently, investment forums, macroeconomic newsletters, and institutional reports have intensified their coverage of gold and related asset classes, driven by elevated concerns over inflation, currency depreciation, and geopolitical fragmentation.

    Beyond retail curiosity, sovereign actors are playing an increasingly visible role in gold market dynamics. According to international financial reporting, global central banks have significantly increased their gold reserves over the last five years, with holdings reaching multi-decade highs. Nations such as China, Russia, Saudi Arabia, and Hungary have expanded their stockpiles, while institutions like the IMF have noted a material decline in U.S. dollar reserve dominance. This broader pivot toward physical gold reflects a growing skepticism toward traditional currency systems, particularly after recent asset seizures and shifting global monetary policies.

    At the same time, prominent hedge fund managers and macro investors have reportedly rotated capital into precious metals and resource equities. Though motivations vary—from protection against dollar volatility to long-term diversification—the directional trend suggests a shared expectation of continued financial instability. These evolving behaviors have contributed to an ecosystem where gold-related content now performs at record engagement levels across both news outlets and investment research platforms.

    Notably, the discourse is also expanding beyond bullion. Mining stocks, streaming firms, and gold-sector ETFs have re-emerged in public conversations due to their historical pattern of outperforming the underlying metal during bull cycles. This pattern, often tied to operational leverage and production scalability, is once again being evaluated by market analysts seeking exposure to gold-aligned opportunities without the logistical or storage limitations of physical assets.

    Additional insights into long-cycle gold behavior, macro trends, and equity exposure models are available through the Wealth Megatrends monthly publication, produced by Weiss Ratings.

    SECTION 4 – TECHNOLOGY SPOTLIGHT

    Within the broader conversation about gold’s long-term role in financial strategy, renewed interest is emerging in an adjacent category: publicly traded gold mining companies. Historically, these companies have moved directionally with the price of gold but have shown the potential for outsized volatility—both upward and downward—due to the inherent operating leverage tied to commodity prices.

    Mining equities represent businesses engaged in the extraction, production, and refinement of gold, often operating across geographically diverse sites. Their revenue models are influenced not only by prevailing spot prices but also by internal efficiencies, fixed operating costs, jurisdictional stability, and resource scalability. This makes them a subject of focused interest for market analysts seeking to interpret how rising gold prices might impact corporate financial performance within the sector.

    In previous gold bull markets—such as those seen in the 1970s, early 2000s, and post-2008—specific gold mining equities exhibited exponential price action relative to the metal itself. This pattern, commonly attributed to margin expansion, arises when rising gold prices exceed fixed production costs. While the price of gold may increase incrementally, the profitability of certain miners can shift more dramatically under favorable conditions, depending on operational factors such as grade, jurisdiction, and scale of output.

    Recent digital commentary also reflects growing awareness of gold mining sub-sectors, including royalty and streaming companies. These entities do not engage directly in mining but instead finance producers in exchange for a fixed share of production, often at below-market rates. As a result, they tend to operate with reduced overhead and exposure, while still participating in the broader gold cycle.

    SECTION 5 – USER JOURNEY NARRATIVE / MARKET RECEPTION

    Public conversation around gold has shifted dramatically in recent quarters, with online forums, financial publications, and independent research platforms documenting a growing reappraisal of gold’s long-term role in diversified strategies. Once considered a niche or defensive holding, gold is increasingly being positioned by investors as a foundational asset in the face of mounting systemic uncertainty.

    The transition in tone—from peripheral interest to mainstream reconsideration—has coincided with several economic flashpoints. These include the recalibration of central bank policies, persistent inflation indicators, and pronounced volatility in both equity and fixed-income markets. As global confidence in fiat stability continues to waver, discourse around asset preservation has taken on new urgency. In this environment, physical gold is commonly cited as a symbolic safeguard, while gold-linked equities are being explored for their cyclical performance dynamics.

    This renewed attention is not limited to physical asset holders. Retail investors who previously focused on conventional equities or index strategies are now engaging with educational content around gold mining companies, royalty models, and global production footprints. Meanwhile, institutional portfolios have been observed increasing their allocations to tangible asset categories, sometimes through passive vehicles that provide exposure to diversified gold equity baskets.

    Notably, this shift in tone is not driven solely by performance metrics but by a broader cultural narrative about financial resilience, global realignment, and the search for assets that exist outside centralized systems.

    Wealth Megatrends is a subscription-based research newsletter published monthly by Weiss Ratings. It provides economic cycle analysis for informational purposes only.

    SECTION 6 – AVAILABILITY AND TRANSPARENCY

    Readers seeking additional context on gold market cycles, equity sector dynamics, or commodity-aligned investment frameworks can find expanded analysis in the Wealth Megatrends publication. The platform is designed to offer economic research and independent forecasting centered around macroeconomic cycles, resource asset classes, and long-term portfolio theory.

    All materials are presented for informational purposes only and are developed using a combination of historical market analysis, third-party data synthesis, and independent evaluation of publicly available company performance metrics. No materials constitute financial advice or investment guidance. Instead, Wealth Megatrends content is intended to support educational exploration for individuals seeking to understand the structural drivers behind evolving market behavior.

    SECTION 7 – FINAL OBSERVATIONS & INDUSTRY CONTEXT

    The renewed momentum behind gold and gold-aligned equities reflects a broader shift in investor expectations across global markets. What began as a defensive reaction to short-term economic stressors has evolved into a long-term reassessment of value preservation frameworks and asset decentralization strategies. Within this environment, commodities such as gold and, by extension, mining sector exposure have re-emerged as central discussion points in the allocation strategies of both institutional and individual investors.

    The movement is not isolated to metals alone. It parallels a growing trend toward so-called “clean-label assets”—investments perceived as tangible, auditable, and less reliant on third-party counterparty risk. This shift mirrors consumer demand in other sectors, where transparency, operational integrity, and verifiable origin are increasingly prioritized over yield projections or promotional narratives.

    As global policy tools face scrutiny and traditional diversification models come under pressure, the precious metals space may continue to serve as both a barometer and a response mechanism to macroeconomic volatility.

    SECTION 8 – PUBLIC COMMENTARY THEME SUMMARY

    Public commentary surrounding the current gold cycle reflects a diverse mix of enthusiasm, skepticism, and inquiry. A recurring theme among bullish observers is the belief that structural global instability—encompassing monetary policy and geopolitical shifts—has triggered a renewed case for gold as a long-term asset.

    At the same time, some participants express concern over the potential for near-term overvaluation. A recurring discussion point involves the pace of recent gains and whether market enthusiasm may be outpacing underlying supply-demand fundamentals.

    Discussions across digital channels also reflect an evolving understanding of how gold-related equities behave differently from physical bullion. Some have noted that while gold mining stocks can amplify exposure to the metal’s price, they may also introduce operational, jurisdictional, or liquidity risks not present in the physical commodity itself.

    Another frequently cited theme involves the role of silver and other precious metals within the current narrative. Some market observers have expressed curiosity about whether these secondary metals will follow gold’s trajectory or establish differentiated cycles based on industrial demand and production forecasts.

    ABOUT THE COMPANY

    Founded to help investors navigate complex economic cycles, Wealth Megatrends is a monthly research publication that provides independent, data-driven analysis across precious metals, energy, and global resource sectors. Veteran cycles analyst Sean Brodrick leads the newsletter and is part of the Weiss Ratings ecosystem, a firm originally established in 1971 and known for its transparent approach to financial modeling and risk assessment.

    The publication does not provide investment advice, treatment, or diagnostic services and is intended strictly for educational and informational purposes.

    Contact:

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: 6 simple questions to tell if a ‘finfluencer’ is more flash than cash

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dimitrios Salampasis, Associate Professor, Emerging Technologies and FinTech | FinTech Capability Lead, Swinburne University of Technology

    Oleg Golovnev/Shutterstock

    Images of flashy sports cars. Lavish lifestyle shots. These are just some of the red flags consumers should watch out for when they turn to social media for financial advice.

    Consumers should not believe everything they see on Instagram, TikTok or YouTube from the growing numbers of “finfluencers” – content creators who build their audience by giving out financial advice.

    The regulator responsible for financial products and advice, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), has issued warning notices to 18 social media finfluencers. ASIC said it suspects they have broken the law by promoting high-risk financial products or providing unlicensed financial advice. ASIC did not name them.

    So, why is regulated financial advice important and what are some of the common practices finfluencers use to attract followers and customers?

    Financial advice rules explained

    Australian Financial Services laws are designed to protect consumers and investors, while promoting the integrity of financial markets. It is both unethical and illegal to promote financial products without proper authorisation.

    In Australia, it is an offence under the Corporations Act to provide financial advice without an Australian Financial Services licence. Penalties include up to five years’ imprisonment or fines of A$1 million or more.

    ASIC issued a similar warning to online finfluencers in 2022. Since then, the number of social media posts by unauthorised finfluencers have substantially reduced.

    Many finfluencers became licensed or authorised representatives of a licensee, along with being more diligent about what they were posting online. Natasha Etschmann, with 300,000 Instagram and TikTok followers at @TashInvests, became licensed immediately after the 2022 warning.

    Some other finfluencers were arrested, issued fines or ordered to take down their websites.

    High-risk products

    However, some finfluencers who style themselves as “trading experts” continue to provide unauthorised financial advice, usually for a fee or commission. They promote high-risk, complex investment products that can cause consumers substantial harm.

    These products include contracts-for-difference
    and over-the-counter derivative products that do not trade on an exchange. ASIC says its current concerns lie with these content creators:

    Their social media content is often accompanied by misleading or deceptive representations about the prospects of success from the products or trading strategies they promote, sharing images of lavish lifestyles, sports cars and other luxury goods.

    What to watch on socials

    About 41% of young Australians aged 18 to 30 look online for financial information or advice.

    While budgeting tips can be helpful, it’s important to be extra careful with online financial advice. Consumers should not believe everything they see on social media.

    Conducting due diligence and checking finfluencers’ credentials on ASIC’s Professional Registers search tool is crucial. Choose expert and licensed finfluencers rather than accounts with large followings and exaggerated or misleading claims. Popularity does not always mean credibility.

    There are certain red flags to watch out for. Some finfluencers use pseudonyms. They promote “exclusive” financial advice content and access to “invitation-only” online communities for a fee. In many cases, they lack credible experience or certified financial planning training to provide financial advice.

    Your finfluencer vetting toolkit

    When choosing to follow or acquire the services of a finfluencer, ask:

    1. is this finfluencer licensed or authorised?

    2. how realistic are the promised financial outcomes? Are they too good to be true?

    3. does the finfluencer disclose their personal financial position or investments when discussing financial products or strategies?

    4. are they transparent about? their track record of accuracy or accountability?

    5. do they address publicly a case when their audience lost money from a strategy they recommended?

    6. does the finfluencer tailor content to different investment risk profiles or financial maturity levels in their audiences?

    Are you being sold a dream?

    Social media finfluencer content can often come with misleading or deceptive representations (such as the sports cars and luxury goods that ASIC has warned about). Content may overstate the prospects of success and potential profits.

    Some – usually unlicensed – finfluencers use social media content as “proof” of their financial expertise. One common practice is to try to lure consumers by creating a hyped world around their own personal lifestyle. Many finfluencers often extend invitations to consumers to join closed forums to “learn” their hidden secrets to success or copy their “famous” trading practices.

    These finfluencers usually try to convince consumers they can achieve a similar lifestyle by following their advice.

    Finfluencers are global

    ASIC issued the warnings as part of a recent global week of action. ASIC and eight regulators from the United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, Italy, Hong Kong and Canada took coordinated action to disrupt unlawful finfluencer activity.
    The global campaign aims to raise awareness about unlawful finfluencer activity, protect consumers, and prevent them from investing after encountering misleading content.

    Consumers need to distinguish between credible financial advice and self-serving or misleading content before trusting their money to anyone.

    Spotted unlicensed influencer activity? Report this misconduct to ASIC.

    Dimitrios Salampasis is a Fellow of the Financial Services Institute of Australasia (FINSIA), member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) and member of the Singapore Institute of Directors (SID).

    ref. 6 simple questions to tell if a ‘finfluencer’ is more flash than cash – https://theconversation.com/6-simple-questions-to-tell-if-a-finfluencer-is-more-flash-than-cash-259906

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: 6 simple questions to tell if a ‘finfluencer’ is more flash than cash

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dimitrios Salampasis, Associate Professor, Emerging Technologies and FinTech | FinTech Capability Lead, Swinburne University of Technology

    Oleg Golovnev/Shutterstock

    Images of flashy sports cars. Lavish lifestyle shots. These are just some of the red flags consumers should watch out for when they turn to social media for financial advice.

    Consumers should not believe everything they see on Instagram, TikTok or YouTube from the growing numbers of “finfluencers” – content creators who build their audience by giving out financial advice.

    The regulator responsible for financial products and advice, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), has issued warning notices to 18 social media finfluencers. ASIC said it suspects they have broken the law by promoting high-risk financial products or providing unlicensed financial advice. ASIC did not name them.

    So, why is regulated financial advice important and what are some of the common practices finfluencers use to attract followers and customers?

    Financial advice rules explained

    Australian Financial Services laws are designed to protect consumers and investors, while promoting the integrity of financial markets. It is both unethical and illegal to promote financial products without proper authorisation.

    In Australia, it is an offence under the Corporations Act to provide financial advice without an Australian Financial Services licence. Penalties include up to five years’ imprisonment or fines of A$1 million or more.

    ASIC issued a similar warning to online finfluencers in 2022. Since then, the number of social media posts by unauthorised finfluencers have substantially reduced.

    Many finfluencers became licensed or authorised representatives of a licensee, along with being more diligent about what they were posting online. Natasha Etschmann, with 300,000 Instagram and TikTok followers at @TashInvests, became licensed immediately after the 2022 warning.

    Some other finfluencers were arrested, issued fines or ordered to take down their websites.

    High-risk products

    However, some finfluencers who style themselves as “trading experts” continue to provide unauthorised financial advice, usually for a fee or commission. They promote high-risk, complex investment products that can cause consumers substantial harm.

    These products include contracts-for-difference
    and over-the-counter derivative products that do not trade on an exchange. ASIC says its current concerns lie with these content creators:

    Their social media content is often accompanied by misleading or deceptive representations about the prospects of success from the products or trading strategies they promote, sharing images of lavish lifestyles, sports cars and other luxury goods.

    What to watch on socials

    About 41% of young Australians aged 18 to 30 look online for financial information or advice.

    While budgeting tips can be helpful, it’s important to be extra careful with online financial advice. Consumers should not believe everything they see on social media.

    Conducting due diligence and checking finfluencers’ credentials on ASIC’s Professional Registers search tool is crucial. Choose expert and licensed finfluencers rather than accounts with large followings and exaggerated or misleading claims. Popularity does not always mean credibility.

    There are certain red flags to watch out for. Some finfluencers use pseudonyms. They promote “exclusive” financial advice content and access to “invitation-only” online communities for a fee. In many cases, they lack credible experience or certified financial planning training to provide financial advice.

    Your finfluencer vetting toolkit

    When choosing to follow or acquire the services of a finfluencer, ask:

    1. is this finfluencer licensed or authorised?

    2. how realistic are the promised financial outcomes? Are they too good to be true?

    3. does the finfluencer disclose their personal financial position or investments when discussing financial products or strategies?

    4. are they transparent about? their track record of accuracy or accountability?

    5. do they address publicly a case when their audience lost money from a strategy they recommended?

    6. does the finfluencer tailor content to different investment risk profiles or financial maturity levels in their audiences?

    Are you being sold a dream?

    Social media finfluencer content can often come with misleading or deceptive representations (such as the sports cars and luxury goods that ASIC has warned about). Content may overstate the prospects of success and potential profits.

    Some – usually unlicensed – finfluencers use social media content as “proof” of their financial expertise. One common practice is to try to lure consumers by creating a hyped world around their own personal lifestyle. Many finfluencers often extend invitations to consumers to join closed forums to “learn” their hidden secrets to success or copy their “famous” trading practices.

    These finfluencers usually try to convince consumers they can achieve a similar lifestyle by following their advice.

    Finfluencers are global

    ASIC issued the warnings as part of a recent global week of action. ASIC and eight regulators from the United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, Italy, Hong Kong and Canada took coordinated action to disrupt unlawful finfluencer activity.
    The global campaign aims to raise awareness about unlawful finfluencer activity, protect consumers, and prevent them from investing after encountering misleading content.

    Consumers need to distinguish between credible financial advice and self-serving or misleading content before trusting their money to anyone.

    Spotted unlicensed influencer activity? Report this misconduct to ASIC.

    Dimitrios Salampasis is a Fellow of the Financial Services Institute of Australasia (FINSIA), member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors (AICD) and member of the Singapore Institute of Directors (SID).

    ref. 6 simple questions to tell if a ‘finfluencer’ is more flash than cash – https://theconversation.com/6-simple-questions-to-tell-if-a-finfluencer-is-more-flash-than-cash-259906

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Rare wooden tools from Stone Age China reveal plant-based lifestyle of ancient lakeside humans

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Bo Li, Professor, Environmental Futures Research Centre, School of Science, University of Wollongong

    Excavation at the Gantangqing site. Liu et al.

    Ancient wooden tools found at a site in Gantangqing in southwestern China are approximately 300,000 years old, new dating has shown. Discovered during excavations carried out in 2014–15 and 2018–19, the tools have now been dated by a team of archaeologists, geologists, chronologists (including me) and paleontologists.

    The rare wooden tools were found alongside an assortment of animal and plant fossils and stone artifacts.

    Taken together, the finds suggest the early humans at Gantangqing were surprisingly sophisticated woodworkers who lived in a rich tropical or subtropical environment where they subsisted by harvesting plants from a nearby lake.

    The location of the Gantangqing site and excavation trenches.
    Liu et al. / Science

    Why ancient wooden tools are so rare

    Wood usually decomposes relatively rapidly due to microbial activity, oxidation, and weathering. Unlike stone or bone, it rarely survives more than a few centuries.

    Wood can only survive for thousands of years or longer if it ends up buried in unusual conditions. Wood can last a long time in oxygen-free environments or extremely dry areas. Charred or fire-hardened wood is also more durable.

    At Gantangqing, the wooden objects were excavated from low-oxygen clay-heavy layers of sediment formed on the ancient shoreline of Fuxian Lake.

    Wooden implements are extremely rare from the Early Palaeolithic period (the first part of the “stone age” from around 3.3 million years ago until 300,000 years ago or so, in which our hominin ancestors first began to use tools). Indeed, wooden tools more than even 50,000 years old are virtually absent outside Africa and western Eurasia.

    As a result, we may have a skewed understanding of Palaeolithic cultures. We may overemphasise the role of stone tools, for example, because they are what has survived.

    What wooden tools were found at Gantangqing?

    The new excavations at Gantangqing found 35 wooden specimens identified as artificially modified tools. These tools were primarily manufactured from pine wood, with a minority crafted from hardwoods.

    Some of the tools had rounded ends, while others had chisel-like thin blades or ridged blades. Of the 35 tools, 32 show marks of intentional modification at their tips, working edges, or bases.

    Two large digging implements were identified as heavy-duty digging sticks designed for two-handed use. These are unique forms of digging implements not documented elsewhere, suggesting localised functional adaptations. There were also four distinct hook-shaped tools — likely used for cutting roots — and a series of smaller tools for one-handed use.

    Nineteen of the tools showed microscopic traces of scraping from shaping or use, while 17 exhibit deliberately polished surfaces. We also identified further evidence of intensive use, including soil residues stuck to tool tips, parallel grooves or streaks along working edges, and characteristic fracture wear patterns.

    The tools from Gantangqing are more complete and show a wider range of functions than those found at contemporary sites such as Clacton in the UK and Florisbad in South Africa.

    The wooden tools from Gantangqing took a variety of forms.
    Liu et al. / Science

    How old are the Gantangqing wooden tools?

    The team used several techniques to figure out the age of the wooden tools. There is no way to determine their age directly, but we can date the sediment in which they were found.

    Using a technique called infrared stimulated luminescence, we analysed more than 10,000 individual grains of minerals from different layers. This showed the sediment was deposited roughly between 350,000 and 200,000 years ago.

    Dating the different layers of sediment excavated at the site produced a detailed timeline.
    Liu et al. / Science

    We also used different techniques to date a mammal tooth found in one of the layers to roughly 288,000 years old. This was consistent with the mineral results.

    Next we used mathematical modelling to bring all the dating results together. Our model indicated that the layers containing stone tools and wooden implements date from 360–300,000 years ago to 290–250,000 years ago.

    What was the environment like?

    Our research indicates the ancient humans at Gantangqing inhabited a warm, humid, tropical or subtropical environment. Pollen extracted from the sediments reveals 40 plant families that confirm this climate.

    Plant fossils further verify the presence of subtropical-to-tropical flora dominated by trees, lianas, shrubs and herbs. Wet-environment plants show the local surroundings were a lakeside or wetlands.

    Animal fossils also fit this picture, including rhinoceros and other mammals, turtles and various birds. The ecosystem was likely a mosaic of grassland, thickets and forests. Evidence of diving ducks confirms the lake must have been at least 2–3 metres deep during human occupation.

    Examples of stone and bone tools found at Gantangqing.
    Liu et al. / Science

    What were the Gantangqing wooden tools used for?

    The site contained evidence of plants such as storable pine nuts and hazelnuts, fruit trees such as kiwi, raspberry-like berries, grapes, edible herbs and fern fronds.

    There were also aquatic plants that would have provided edible leaves, seeds, tubers and rhizomes. These were likely dug up from shallow mud near the shore, using wooden tools.

    These findings suggest the Gantangqing hominins may have made expeditions to the lake shore, carrying purpose-made wooden digging sticks to harvest underground food sources. To do this, they would have had to anticipate seasonal plant distributions, know exactly what parts of different plants were edible, and produce specialised tools for different tasks.

    Why the Gantangqing site is important

    The wooden implements from Gantangqing represent the earliest known evidence for the use of digging sticks and for the exploitation of underground plant storage organs such as tubers within the Oriental biogeographic realm. Our discovery shows the use of sophisticated wood technology in a very different environmental context from what has been seen at sites of similar age in Europe and Africa.

    The find significantly expands our understanding of early hominin woodworking capabilities.

    The hominins who lived at Gantangqing appear to have lived a heavily plant-based subsistence lifestyle. This is in contrast to colder, more northern settings where tools of similar age have been found (such as Schöningen in Germany), where hunting large mammals was the key to survival.

    The site also shows how important wood – and perhaps other organic materials – were to “stone age” hominins. These wooden artifacts show far more sophisticated manufacturing skill than the relative rudimentary stone tools found at sites of similar age across East and Southeast Asia.

    The excavation, curation, and research of the Gantangqing site were supported by
    National Cultural Heritage Administration (China), Yunnan Provincial Institute of
    Cultural Relics and Archaeology, Yuxi Municipal Bureau of Culture and Tourism,
    Chengjiang Municipal Bureau of Culture and Tourism, Australian Research Council
    (ARC) Discovery Projects, Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese
    Academy of Sciences, Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC), National Natural
    Science Foundation of China (NSFC).

    ref. Rare wooden tools from Stone Age China reveal plant-based lifestyle of ancient lakeside humans – https://theconversation.com/rare-wooden-tools-from-stone-age-china-reveal-plant-based-lifestyle-of-ancient-lakeside-humans-260204

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Video: Gaza , Palestine, Lebanon & other topics – Daily Press Briefing (3 July 2025) | United Nations

    Source: United Nations (video statements)

    Noon Briefing by Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

    Highlights:
    Secretary-General/Trip Announcement
    Deputy Secretary-General
    Gaza 
    Occupied Palestinian Territory
    Lebanon
    Cyprus
    Ukraine
    Russia
    Senior Personnel Appointment  
    Yemen
    Global Risk Report
    International Days
    Financial Contribution

    SECRETARY-GENERAL/TRIP ANNOUNCEMENT
    The Secretary-General will be arriving in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, to attend the 17th Summit of the BRICS countries.
    The Secretary-General has been invited to speak at an outreach session on “Strengthening multilateralism, economic-financial affairs and artificial intelligence”, that will take place on Sunday, 6 July. On Monday, 7 July, he will address a second outreach session, on “Environment, COP30 and global health.”
    During his visit, the Secretary-General will also be having meetings with various leaders who are attending the BRICS Summit and we will share those readouts with you.

    DEPUTY SECRETARY-GENERAL
    Our Deputy Secretary-General, Amina Mohammed, returned to Seville today for the closing of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development (FFD4).
    At the closing with Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez of Spain, she underscored the consensus around the Seville Agreement as a demonstration of multilateralism in action — with actions to close the SDG financing gap, address the debt crisis, and reform the international financial architecture. She recognized the more than 100 initiatives launched on the Sevilla Platform for Action, including solidarity levies on private jets and first-class travel to generate new resources for sustainable development.
    She said that the UN will be operationalizing a Seville Forum on Debt to help countries learn from one another and coordinate their approaches in debt management and restructuring; that forum will be supported by Spain.
    She called for FFD4 to be remembered not only as a conference that responded to crisis, but as the moment the world chose cooperation over fragmentation, unity over division, and action over inertia.
    Tomorrow, she will travel to Praia, Cabo Verde, to take part in celebrations marking the 50th anniversary of the country’s independence.

    GAZA 
    The Secretary-General is appalled by the deepening humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Multiple attacks in recent days hitting sites hosting displaced people and people trying to access food have killed and injured scores of Palestinians. The Secretary-General strongly condemns the civilian loss of life. 
    In just one day this week, Israeli orders to relocate forced nearly 30,000 people to flee, yet again, with no safe place to go and clearly inadequate supplies of shelter, food, medicine or water.
    International humanitarian law is unambiguous: civilians must be respected and protected, and the needs of the population must be met.
    With no fuel having entered Gaza in more than 17 weeks, the Secretary-General is gravely concerned that the last lifelines for survival are being cut off. Without an urgent influx of fuel, incubators will shut down, ambulances will be unable to reach the injured and sick, and water cannot be purified. The delivery by the United Nations and partners of what little of our lifesaving humanitarian aid is left in Gaza will also grind to a halt. 
    He once again calls for full, safe and sustained humanitarian access so aid can reach people who have been deprived of the basics of life for far too long. The UN has a clear and proven plan, rooted in the humanitarian principles, to get vital assistance to civilians – safely and at scale, wherever they are. 
    The Secretary-General reiterates that all parties must uphold their obligations under international law. He renews his call for an immediate permanent ceasefire and for the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups. 

    Full Highlights:
    https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/noon-briefing-highlight?date%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=03%20July%202025

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CJL7IZOkzs

    MIL OSI Video

  • Trump, Putin reiterate positions on Ukraine war in phone call, Kremlin aide says

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    U.S. President Donald Trump pushed for a quick halt to the Ukraine war in a Thursday phone call with Vladimir Putin, while a Kremlin aide said the Russian president reiterated that Moscow would keep pushing to solve the conflict’s “root causes.”

    The two leaders did not discuss a recent pause in some U.S. weapons shipments to Kyiv during the nearly hour-long call, according to a readout provided by Putin aide Yuri Ushakov.

    Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, meanwhile, told reporters in Denmark that he hopes to speak to Trump as soon as Friday about the ongoing pause in some weapons shipments, which was first disclosed earlier this week.

    Trump did not immediately comment on the conversation with Putin, but he said on social media beforehand that he would speak to the Russian leader.

    “Root causes” has become Russian shorthand for issue of NATO enlargement and Western support for Ukraine, including the rejection of any notion of Ukraine joining the NATO alliance. Russian leaders are also angling to establish greater control over political decisions made in Kyiv and other eastern European capitals, NATO leaders have said.

    The diplomatic back-and-forth comes as the U.S. has paused shipments of certain critical weapons to Ukraine due to low stockpiles, sources earlier told Reuters.

    That decision led to Ukraine calling in the acting U.S. envoy to Kyiv on Wednesday to underline the importance of military aid from Washington, and caution that the move would weaken Ukraine’s ability to defend against intensifying Russian airstrikes and battlefield advances.

    The Pentagon’s move led in part to a cut in deliveries of Patriot air defence missiles that Ukraine relies on to destroy fast-moving ballistic missiles, Reuters reported on Wednesday.

    Ushakov, the Kremlin aide, said the issue of weapons deliveries to Ukraine did not come up during the Trump-Putin phone call.

    Ushakov added that while Russia was open to continuing to speak with the U.S., any peace negotiations needed to occur between Moscow and Kyiv.

    That comment comes amid some indications that Moscow is trying to avoid a trilateral format for any peace negotiations. The Russians asked American diplomats to leave the room during such a meeting in Istanbul in early June, Ukrainian officials have said.

    Trump and Putin did not talk about a face-to-face meeting, Ushakov said.

    -Reuters

  • MIL-OSI Security: Farmington Man Pleads Guilty to Possession of Child Sexual Abuse Material

    Source: US FBI

    CONCORD – A Farmington man pleaded guilty yesterday in federal court to the possession of child sexual abuse material (CSAM), Acting U.S. Attorney Jay McCormack announces.

    Michael F.J. Murphy, age 45, pleaded guilty in federal court in Concord to one count of possession of child pornography.  U.S. District Court Judge Paul Barbadoro scheduled Murphy’s sentencing for October 14, 2025.

    According to the charging documents and statements made in court, in December 2023, the defendant shared a video depicting CSAM with law enforcement using a file-sharing platform.

    The charging statute provides for a sentence of up to 10 years of imprisonment, but if any image of child pornography involved in the offense involved a prepubescent minor or a minor who had not attained 12 years of age, the maximum penalty is increased to 20 years of imprisonment. The statute provides for a supervised release term of not less than 5 years and up to life, and a maximum fine of $250,000. Sentences are imposed by a federal district court judge based upon the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and statutes which govern the determination of a sentence in a criminal case.

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Idaho Attorney General’s Internet Crimes Against Children Unit led the investigation. The New Hampshire Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force, the United Kingdom South East Regional Crime Unit, and the Farmington Police Department provided valuable assistance. Assistant U.S Attorney Charles L. Rombeau is prosecuting the case.

    This case was brought as part of Project Safe Childhood, a nationwide initiative to combat the growing epidemic of child sexual exploitation and abuse, launched in May 2006 by the Department of Justice. Led by the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the DOJ’s Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section, Project Safe Childhood marshals federal, state, and local resources to locate, apprehend, and prosecute individuals who exploit children, as well as identify and rescue victims. For more information about Project Safe Childhood, please visit https://www.justice.gov/psc.

     

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Pride Month event discusses disinformation, democracy and minority rights

    Source: Chatham House –

    Pride Month event discusses disinformation, democracy and minority rights
    News release
    krousseau.drupal

    The event discussed online harms faced by LGBTIQ+ communities and what they mean for democracies worldwide.

    Chatham House’s EDI Working Group arranged a public panel at Chatham House on 26 June 2025 to map the state of LGBTIQ+ rights online and explore where better policies are possible.

    Chaired by Isabella Wilkinson (Research Fellow, Digital Society Programme and LGBTIQ+ Co-Chair, EDI Working Group), the event spotlighted global trends in disinformation messaging, targeting and impacts, painting a sobering picture of democratic backsliding and barriers to public participation.

    Speaking at the event were Peter Tatchell, a renowned human rights activist; Lucy Middleton, the Thomson Reuters Foundation’s LGBTQ+ correspondent; and Francesca Gentile, an open-source researcher from the Centre for Information Resilience.

    Drawing on speakers’ expertise, the conversation also highlighted how online threats have offline consequences, with disproportionate harms faced by parts of the LGBTIQ+ communities, such as trans people.

    Rheea Saggar, Marketing and Communications Manager and LGBTIQ+ Co-Chair, EDI Working Group, said:

    ‘The event highlighted why protecting minority rights online is a matter of democratic resilience and demands intersectional approaches: there is no one-size-fits-all solution.’

    Joseph Osayande, Deputy Head of Individual Memberships and chair of Chatham House’s EDI Working Group, said:

    ‘We are grateful to our speakers and lively audience and look forward to hosting other timely discussions on issues of EDI in international affairs.’  

    Chatham House’s Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Working Group coordinates, consults on and supports the delivery of EDI-related events and activities across the institute. If you are interested in getting involved, please contact us

    MIL OSI NGO