Category: Fisheries

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congresswoman Tenney Hosts Vietnam Veteran Pinning Ceremony in Wayne County

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Claudia Tenney (NY-22)

    Victor, New York—Congresswoman Claudia Tenney (NY-24) today honored 40 Vietnam veterans from the Finger Lakes Region during a Vietnam War Commemorative Pinning Ceremony at the Veterans of Foreign Wars Memorial Post in Lyons. 

    Tenney was joined at the event by New York State Senator Pam Helming, Assemblywoman Marjorie Byrnes, Assemblyman Brian Manktelow, and Assemblyman Jeff Gallahan. 

    Tenney awarded each veteran a commemorative Vietnam Veteran Lapel Pin, symbolizing the nation’s heartfelt gratitude for their service. This pin, an emblem of honor, is part of a national initiative to acknowledge and thank veterans who served during the Vietnam War. In August, Tenney honored 30 Vietnam veterans at a similar ceremony in Oswego County as part of her ongoing initiative to pay tribute to the brave men and women who served during the Vietnam War and their families for their selfless sacrifice. 

    “For many Vietnam veterans, the service and the struggles they endured went unrecognized for far too long. Today, we strove to right that wrong, by showing them the respect, honor, and appreciation they have always deserved. By hosting these commemorative pining events, I hope to convey our deep appreciation for the courage and resilience of these veterans. It was an honor to present these 40 Vietnam veterans from our community with a small token of our nation’s gratitude for their selfless sacrifice. Thank you to these individuals and their families for their profound sacrifice and unwavering dedication to our great nation,” said Congresswoman Tenney.

    “For many of our Vietnam veterans, coming home meant quietly putting away memories of service. But today, as you stand together, I hope you feel the strength of connection, with fellow veterans, your families, and all of us who honor you. It’s never too late to celebrate and recognize our veterans as heroes. Our younger generations need your stories, your wisdom, and your example,” said Senator Helming

    “This is a great opportunity to show our Vietnam veterans the respect and appreciation that they deserve. When I think about the heroes welcome that these brave men and women didn’t receive 40 years ago, I am beyond heartbroken. I applaud Congresswoman Tenney for her actions to ensure that every Vietnam Veteran receives the recognition and support that they deserve. Today is just one of many days that we honor and recognize their bravery and heroism,” said Assemblyman Manktelow.

    “I would like to thank Congresswoman Tenney for bringing us all together to honor the brave men and women who put their lives on the line in service to our country. As a representative for New York’s Finger Lakes region, I have always been proud to recognize our Veterans and thank them for their courage and willingness to make the ultimate sacrifice for the freedoms we all so deeply cherish. Unfortunately, many of our Vietnam Veterans did not receive the hero’s welcome home they deserved. The goal of this commemorative pinning ceremony is to give these Veterans that formal ‘welcome home’ and I could not be happier to be a part of such a special event,” Assemblyman Gallahan. 

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: Visit by Tuvalu Prime Minister Teo and Madame Teo concludes following National Day celebrations, successfully deepens staunch diplomatic alliance

    Source: Republic of Taiwan – Ministry of Foreign Affairs

    Visit by Tuvalu Prime Minister Teo and Madame Teo concludes following National Day celebrations, successfully deepens staunch diplomatic alliance

    • Date:2024-10-13
    • Data Source:Department of East Asian and Pacific Affairs

    October 13, 2024
    No. 352

    A visit to Taiwan by Tuvalu Prime Minister Feleti Penitala Teo and Madame Tausaga Teo concluded as their delegation departed on the evening of October 12. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) Department of East Asian and Pacific Affairs Director General Peter Sha-li Lan was present at the airport to bid farewell to the delegation on behalf of the government of Taiwan.

    In addition to meeting with President Lai Ching-te and attending a banquet hosted by Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung, Prime Minister Teo was a guest of honor at Taiwan’s National Day celebrations and associated functions.

    In his meeting with President Lai, Prime Minister Teo emphasized that Tuvalu cherished its 45-year alliance with Taiwan. He said that Tuvalu would continue to staunchly support Taiwan in expanding its international participation and speak up for Taiwan in the international arena, demonstrating the Tuvaluan government’s true friendship with Taiwan.

    Given the close cooperation on fisheries between Taiwan and Tuvalu and Prime Minister Teo’s many years of service in posts at international fisheries organizations, MOFA also organized a special itinerary that took Prime Minister Teo and his delegation south to Kaohsiung, Taiwan’s deep-sea fishing center. Prime Minister Teo met with Kaohsiung Mayor Chen Chi-mai to discuss a sister-city agreement between Kaohsiung and Funafuti, Tuvalu’s capital city, and attended a reception to interact with representatives from Taiwan’s deep-sea fisheries sector. The event successfully advanced connections between high-level Tuvaluan officials and Taiwan’s fisheries industry, laying a solid foundation for the deepening of bilateral fisheries cooperation going forward.

    As Tainan continues to celebrate its 400th anniversary of establishment throughout 2024, MOFA also arranged for Prime Minister Teo to visit the city once again. Deputy Mayor Yeh Tse-shan was present to welcome Prime Minister Teo and his delegation. During their stay in Tainan, the group paid a visit to Anping Old Fort, where Taiwan’s rich history and culture and the warm hospitality of the people of Tainan left a deep impression on the visitors.

    Tuvalu is a key ally of Taiwan in the Pacific. This visit—Prime Minister Teo’s second trip to Taiwan since taking office in February—proved to be greatly significant in terms of strengthening bilateral ties. Based on their solid existing foundation of cooperation in such areas as information and communication security, climate change adaptation, medicine and healthcare, women’s empowerment, and offshore fisheries, the two countries will continue to work together to advance the well-being of their peoples and jointly promote prosperity and development in the Indo-Pacific region. (E)

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-Evening Report: How we treat catchment water to make it safe to drink

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Patrick Taylor, Chief Environmental Scientist, EPA Victoria; Honorary Professor, School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University

    Andriana Syvanych/Shutterstock

    Most of us are fortunate that, when we turn on the tap, clean, safe and high-quality water comes out.

    But a senate inquiry into the presence of PFAS or “forever chemicals” is putting the safety of our drinking water back in the spotlight.

    Lidia Thorpe, the independent senator leading the inquiry, says Elders in the Aboriginal community of Wreck Bay in New South Wales are “buying bottled water out of their aged care packages” due to concerns about the health impacts of PFAS in their drinking water.

    So, how is water deemed safe to drink in Australia? And why does water quality differ in some areas?

    Here’s what happens between a water catchment and your tap.

    Human intervention in the water cycle

    There is no “new” water on Earth. The water we drink can be up to 4.5 billion years old and is continuously recycled through the hydrological cycle. This transfers water from the ground to the atmosphere through evaporation and back again (for example, through rain).

    Humans interfere with this natural cycle by trapping and redirecting water from various sources to use. A lot happens before it reaches your home.

    The quality of the water when you turn on the tap depends on a range of factors, including the local geology, what kind of activities happen in catchment areas, and the different treatments used to process it.

    Maroondah dam in Healesville, Victoria.
    doublelee/Shutterstock

    How do we decide what’s safe?

    The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines define what is considered safe, good-quality drinking water.

    The guidelines set acceptable water quality values for more than 250 physical, chemical and bacterial contaminants. They take into account any potential health impact of drinking the contaminant over a lifetime as well as aesthetics – the taste and colour of the water.

    The guidelines are not mandatory but provide the basis for determining if the quality of water to be supplied to consumers in all parts of Australia is safe to drink. The guidelines undergo rolling revision to ensure they represent the latest scientific evidence.

    From water catchment to tap

    Australians’ drinking water mainly comes from natural catchments. Sources include surface water, groundwater and seawater (via desalination).

    Public access to these areas is typically limited to preserve optimal water quality.

    Filtration and purification of water occurs naturally in catchments as it passes through soil, sediments, rocks and vegetation.

    But catchment water is subject to further treatment via standard processes that typically focus on:

    • removing particulates (for example, soil and sediment)

    • filtration (to remove particles and their contaminants)

    • disinfection (for example, using chlorine and chloramine to kill bacteria and viruses)

    • adding fluoride to prevent tooth decay

    • adjusting pH to balance the chemistry of the water and to aid filtration.

    This water is delivered to our taps via a reticulated system – a network of underground reservoirs, pipes, pumps and fittings.

    In areas where there is no reticulated system, drinking water can also be sourced from rainwater tanks. This means the quality of drinking water can vary.

    Sources of contamination can come from roof catchments feeding rainwater tanks as well from the tap due to lead in plumbing fittings and materials.

    So, does all water meet these standards?

    Some rural and remote areas, especially First Nations communities, rely on poor-quality surface water and groundwater
    for their drinking water.

    Rural and regional water can exceed recommended guidelines for salt, microbial contaminants and trace elements, such as lead, manganese and arsenic.

    The federal government and other agencies are trying to address this.

    There are many impacts of poor regional water quality. These include its implication in elevated rates of tooth decay in First Nations people. This occurs when access to chilled, sugary drinks is cheaper and easier than access to good quality water.

    What about PFAS?

    There is also renewed concern about the presence of PFAS or “forever” chemicals in drinking water.

    Recent research examining the toxicity of PFAS chemicals along with their presence in some drinking water catchments in Australia and overseas has prompted a recent assessment of water source contamination.

    A review by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) proposed lowering the limits for four PFAS chemicals in drinking water: PFOA, PFOS, PFHxS and PFBS.

    The review used publicly available data and found most drinking water supplies are currently below the proposed new guideline values for PFAS.

    However, “hotspots” of PFAS remain where drinking water catchments or other sources (for example, groundwater) have been impacted by activities where PFAS has been used in industrial applications. And some communities have voiced concerns about an association between elevated PFAS levels in their communities and cancer clusters.

    While some PFAS has been identified as carcinogenic, it’s not certain that PFAS causes cancer. The link is still being debated.

    Importantly, assessment of exposure levels from all sources in the population shows PFAS levels are falling meaning any exposure risk has also reduced over time.

    How about removing PFAS from water?

    Most sources of drinking water are not associated with industrial contaminants like PFAS. So water sources are generally not subject to expensive treatment processes, like reverse osmosis, that can remove most waterborne pollutants, including PFAS. These treatments are energy-intensive and expensive and based on recent water quality assessments by the NHMRC will not be needed.

    While contaminants are everywhere, it is the dose that makes the poison. Ultra-low concentrations of chemicals including PFAS, while not desirable, may not be harmful and total removal is not warranted.

    Mark Patrick Taylor is a full-time employee of EPA Victoria, appointed to the statutory role of Chief Environmental Scientist. He is also an Honorary Professor at Macquarie University. EPA Victoria has previously received funding from the Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action and Victorian water authorities to understand the presence of contaminants waste water. He has previously received funding from the Australian Government, ARC and other government agencies for environmental pollution research.

    Antti Mikkonen is a full-time employee of EPA Victoria, in the role of Principal Health Risk Advisor for chemicals. Antti has previously received funding from the Australian Government Department of Education for research to understand PFAS bioaccumulation in livestock and models for risk management.

    Minna Saaristo is a full-time employee of EPA Victoria, appointed to the role of Principal Scientist – Ecological Risk and Emerging contaminants. She is affiliate of the School of Biological Sciences at Monash University. EPA Victoria has previously received funding from the Department of Energy, Environment and Climate Action and Victorian water authorities to understand the presence of emerging contaminants in recycled water. She has previously received funding from the Australian Government, ARC and other government agencies for environmental pollution research.

    ref. How we treat catchment water to make it safe to drink – https://theconversation.com/how-we-treat-catchment-water-to-make-it-safe-to-drink-242206

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Sullivan Highlights Work to Advance Priorities of Alaska Native People at Annual AFN Convention

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alaska Dan Sullivan
    10.18.24
    ANCHORAGE, ALASKA—U.S. Senator Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), addressing the Alaska Federation of Natives (AFN) annual convention today, spoke about the progress that has been made to advance the interests of Alaska Native people at the federal level in the past year, and highlighted work he is doing with Alaska Native communities to address challenges facing rural Alaska, like the devastating crash of salmon runs in parts of the state, limited access to affordable housing, the youth mental health crisis, and the disturbingly high rates of drug overdose deaths driven by fentanyl.
    [embedded content]
    Senator Sullivan discussed his work with the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC) to secure the renewal of Alaska whaling captains’ quota at the recent International Whaling Commission (IWC) meeting in Peru; a new Alaska Salmon Research Task Force report created by his 2022 legislation; his team’s relentless efforts that led to a comprehensive ban on Russian seafood imports; and his efforts to address the Department of the Interior’s dismal implementation of his 2019 legislation to deliver Alaska Native Vietnam-era veterans the land allotments they are due.
    Finally, Sen. Sullivan also emphasized the legacy of patriotism of Alaska Native people and the critical ongoing military build-up taking place across Alaska.
    Below is a full transcript of Sen. Sullivan’s remarks.
    It’s an honor for me to be here today. AFN is certainly one of the highlights of the year for me, and for my wife, Julie, who is here in the audience today. I always look to her for my strength. She’s having a great time with her cousins and buying Christmas gifts for our family and friends.
    By the way, we are always amazed by the incredible crafts and artwork on display throughout the convention hall. To all of our skilled artisans, I want you to know I’ve just introduced two new pieces of legislation that I worked with many of you on to protect your rights as Alaska Native artists—and the next generation—to continue the centuries-old practice of using natural materials, like walrus ivory and bird feathers, in your artwork.
    That should be a no-brainer and we’re going to try and get a law passed to make sure that happens.
    I want to thank AFN leadership: Ana, Joe, and a big congratulations to Ben Mallott. We are excited about Ben’s strong leadership and his great experience with AFN. Ben, we are 100% behind you and think you’re going to do a great job here.
    And, of course, I know Julie Kitka has gotten a lot of accolades, and she deserves every single one of them. On the Senate floor back in D.C., I regularly give a speech about a special Alaskan, who we call the “Alaskan of the Week.” I try to get this every week. By the way—[there are] a lot of folks from our Alaska Native community who have been our “Alaskan of the Week.”
    So recently I gave a speech about Julie as our “Alaskan of the Week,” about her great service, and in that speech, I usually love to brag about that person, that Alaskan. But Julie Kitka, always humble, stressed that the great successes of AFN throughout her tenure were accomplished because of partnerships with all of you. She actually said when we were writing the speech, “Nothing I did was ever done alone.”
    Partnership is such a great leadership model. So, Julie Kitka, one more time—thank you for your great leadership. You’ve done such a great job.
    Alaska Travels
    As I always do, my Julie and I spent this past summer traveling to many rural Alaska communities including Saint Paul, Kotzebue, we were up on the Yukon, we were in the Ahtna region, to Nuiqsut and Utqia?vik. As always, we learned so much in our roundtable discussions, especially from our elders.
    We saw beautiful dancing. I tried to dance a little bit myself. That’s always embarrassing. We ate delicious food, met new friends and reconnected with old ones. So, again, to everybody that we were with—and it was with a lot of folks that summer—thank you for the warm, wonderful hospitality that we experienced literally everywhere we went. It is such a blessing of our Native communities.
    And as part of these travels, we were honored to attend Nalukataq in Utqia?vik.
    It’s magic when the whole community comes out to celebrate a cultural practice—subsistence whaling in this case—that Inupiat whalers have sustainably conducted for thousands of years.
    International Whaling Commission Meeting
    And this year, like six years ago, these same whaling captains were able to successfully renew—through very hard work—their quota at the International Whaling Commission (IWC) meeting in Peru.
    That is a big deal and deserves a round of applause. A really big deal. This has been a top priority of mine as your senator. As we know, success is never guaranteed at these International Whaling Commission meetings. The IWC has not always been a friend of our Alaska whaling captains. So before the big IWC meeting that was in Brazil in 2018 and in Peru this year, we all came together and put together a strategy with our whaling captains.
    We met with the U.S. State Department and NOAA to ensure the United States, as a country, had a coordinated strategy to make sure our Alaska Native whaling captains were able to get their IWC quota. That was part of the strategy. Both in 2018 and this past year in 2024, I hosted a reception in the U.S. Capitol. Here’s some photos from that.
    The goal of this reception was to invite the ambassadors, particularly from the countries that have not been friends of Alaska Native whaling, because we need their votes at this international convention. So if you see here at this convention, at one point, both in 2018 and in 2024, I looked across the reception area and literally every whaling captain had a Latin American ambassador with their arm around him.
    This is great lobbying on behalf of the IWC. And it worked! It worked because in Peru, just last month, our Alaska Whaling Eskimo Commission leaders were able to secure the first automatic quota renewal in IWC history. That is a giant triumph for Alaska Natives.
    In that regard, I want to do a big shout-out to AEWC Chair John Hopson Jr., the dynamic father-son duo of Crawford Patkotak, vice chair of the AEWC, and Josiah Patkotak, his son, the mayor of the North Slope Borough, and so many others. They all made it happen again. The children of the North Slope will look back at what the Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission has achieved in the last 6 years and they will be grateful for decades to come.
    Salmon
    These whaling quotas are the kind of successes we can achieve when we unite behind a common mission.
    It’s more challenging, but this is also the approach I’m taking—working with so many of you—to address our salmon crisis.
    As you all know, we’ve had another banner year in terms of the strength certain salmon runs, like the Bristol Bay sockeye salmon run. But in the Yukon and Kuskokwim and other Interior rivers throughout our state, the runs have once again crashed. Representative Peltola talked very passionately about this yesterday, and our congressional delegation has always worked together to focus on these very important issues.
    I mentioned this to all of you before, but I’ll do it again. Over three decades ago, I was introduced to what salmon means to Native culture and people through my amazing wife Julie and her family’s fish camp near Hess Creek on the Yukon River. As a family, we have so many amazing memories and experiences at Julie’s family’s fish camp, particularly with our three daughters.
    And I know so many people have the same memories, learning how to head and gut and strip and smoke salmon on the banks of the Yukon, learning about their culture, about sharing, about family, about working together, about their heritage. When the Kings are running on the Yukon, it’s the most spiritual place in the world. When the fish aren’t running, and when the smoke houses are empty, it feels like something is very wrong with the universe.
    We experienced that feeling at Julie’s family’s fish camp this summer. We’re all worried—desperately worried—that a whole generation of children will miss out on this vital experience. It is soul wrenching.
    So here’s what I’m working on with all of you and, of course, with our congressional delegation.
    Alaskans can agree—we need to identify and address research prioritization gaps with comprehensive data and the best scientific minds, including Indigenous communities, to figure out the causes of these devastating salmon declines.
    That’s what my bill—the Alaska Salmon Research Task Force Act—does. This bill was passed into law. And here’s what it does. It brings the best minds in the world—state, federal, university, Indigenous, tribal—to figure out what is happening. It includes a specific working group focused on the Yukon and Kuskokwim.
    By the way, it probably doesn’t surprise you, but this bill was my wife Julie’s idea. And the Task Force report was just recently completed. This was required by the law. It’s at my booth and if you want a copy, we would love for you guys to take a look at my booth here at AFN. I want to thank so many in our Alaska Native community who took part in this Task Force and the research and the hard work of this report.
    This is what the Task Force recommends as we move forward. They call it “Gravel to Gravel,” “G to G,” which is a strategic approach that coordinates research where individual projects, regardless of whether they are led by state and federal, university, tribal or NGOs, will share information with other projects on what is happening to our salmon.
    With this critically important report now completed, my team and I will be working with all of you to build a comprehensive, well-funded salmon research program at the federal level on the goal that we all share: Achieving greater abundance and stability in our salmon stocks all across Alaska.
    Now, this won’t happen overnight, but you have my commitment that we will continue to work our hearts out on getting our salmon back in our rivers for our children, and our children’s children.
    We have to get to the bottom of this and address it. I certainly am committed to working with all of you on this.
    Another thing I know we can unite on in terms of a goal with regard to fisheries—which we’re able to achieve recently—is making sure that Russia can no longer flood America’s domestic markets with their cheap, unsustainable fish.
    After a long battle with the Biden administration, I was able to finally get them to ban Russian fish from coming into our country. When the Russians tried to circumvent this ban by sending their fish through Communist China, we shut down that loophole too. This will help all of our coastal communities, many of which are Native communities, and our Alaska fishermen.
    The Russian oligarchs say they’re in a war with Alaska’s fishermen. Well, we’re finally fighting back.
    This includes banning unsafe and often illegal Russian and Chinese trawlers who are likely contributing to depleting our own salmon runs here at home. I’m now pressing leaders from around the world—from Japan, to Canada, to Europe—to ban these fish.
    The world should want Freedom Fish from Alaska, not Communist Fish from China or Russia!
    Report on Children
    Now I want to turn to an incredibly important theme this year: Our Children, Our Future Ancestors. I really want to thank the commissioners, like Gloria O’Neil and Don Gray, and all of those who worked on “The Way Forward: Report of the Alyce Spotted Bear & Walter Soboleff Commission on Native Children.”
    To Gloria’s point during that last session, we certainly want to follow up with the work Gloria and others did in that important report. We don’t want to let that report go onto a shelf and collect dust. That report was spearheaded by legislation that Senator Murkowski wrote, that I co-sponsored. And, as Gloria and Don said, we know that the statistics are not great. As a matter of fact, they’re horrible.
    Too many Alaska Native children are experiencing poverty and abuse. Too many are in the juvenile justice system. Too many are experiencing mental health challenges.
    There have been many reports throughout the decades on the well-being of Alaska Native people. Gloria mentioned that in her comments just a few minutes ago. 30 years ago, if you look at this report my mother-in-law, Mary Jane Fate, worked on—the 1994 report that was also mandated by federal legislation. When she testified before Congress, she stated:
    “Today we find ourselves in a crisis situation. The outrageous school dropouts, high unemployment, hopelessness, and other tragic and sad endings such as the highest rates of suicides and accidents amongst our youth.”
    That was 30 years ago. The situation then was dire and still is if you look at the report that Gloria and Don just authored. But here’s the thing. We cannot lose hope. This is our youth, and we must recognize that there has been progress in the last 30 years since that last report, particularly significant improvement in education, in life expectancy, and in rates of poverty.
    So we must do more working together, and again, I want to thank Gloria and Don for their leadership.
    Mental Health
    One of the key issues in their report is resiliency. We need that, among all Alaskan kids, among all American kids. In that regard, mental health is key.
    As outlined in “The Way Forward” report, 31 percent of Alaska Natives told researchers: “My mental health is poor most of the time or always.” 21 percent of youth in the report said they had been bullied on social media or through texts.
    I know social media can be a great positive for many, particularly for those who live in Rural Alaska. But as we’re building out our historic broadband infrastructure in Rural Alaska, we need to understand that there is a very strong correlation between declining mental health and increasing social media use for all young Alaskans and for all young Americans.
    I have been very focused on this issue and can report important progress back in D.C. A few months ago, the Kids Online Safety and Privacy Act—of which I am an original cosponsor—passed the Senate with over 91 votes. “KOSA,” as we call it, gives parents significantly more control over what their kids are allowed to see online and limits harmful and addictive content that kids are bombarded with online.
    This is a good start, but we must do more to protect our children. We can have the strongest economy in the world, the best quality of life in the world, but none of that means anything if so many of our kids are depressed or considering ending their lives because of what they’re consuming online. We have to get started on this important issue.
    One Pill Can Kill
    Another issue that I’m very focused on that relates to our youth—this is a huge one—is the deadly fentanyl crisis that’s hit our state very hard, especially among our youth.
    The new numbers for 2023 just recently came out. Take a look at these slides. These numbers are shocking! The number one cause of overdose deaths in Alaska—particularly among our young people—are fentanyl overdoses, up roughly 45% from just last year. By the way, in other areas across the country these numbers are dropping dramatically. But in our state, they are continuing to surge. To surge!
    Alaska Natives account for 33% of drug overdose deaths from fentanyl last year. Our kids need to be educated about this lethal drug. That’s why my team and I, working with schools and organizations across the state, have launched the “One Pill Can Kill” campaign.
    What is it? It’s educating our youth that even a tiny, tiny bit—look at how small that is on a pencil tip—a tiny bit of fentanyl can be lethal. They need to know the drugs they buy on the streets or from friends, including marijuana, can be laced with fentanyl and can kill you. They need to know that one pill can kill.
    I would very much like to partner with AFN and other Native organizations across Alaska on this campaign. You can find information about it on my website and at my booth downstairs. But here’s the bottom line: If we can save even one young Alaskan’s life with this campaign, then it will be worth it.
    Housing
    Now, as you all know, raising healthy families with healthy children requires safe, affordable housing. Let’s face it, in pretty much every part of Alaska, especially Rural Alaska, we don’t have that.
    Last August, I hosted the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development in Alaska. A number of you were there at our roundtable that was focused on the outrageously high cost of housing in rural Alaska.
    The Secretary of HUD, she runs a big bureaucracy back in D.C. Unfortunately, we are still waiting for HUD’s recommendations on how to reduce the federal red tape that is a part of the problem of the high cost of housing in Rural Alaska. But here’s the deal. We shouldn’t have to wait. We can do so much of this ourselves.
    I’ve seen incredible innovation in housing during all of my travels throughout Rural Alaska. Last summer, Julie and I saw how Native leaders in Huslia and Hughes were building affordable, beautiful housing—just like in this photo—at much more competitive costs.
    These great leaders in our state weren’t waiting for the D.C. bureaucrats to give them permission to build. I’ll never forget in 2018, when I was in Holy Cross, talking about housing with World War II veteran Luke Demientieff and his son Leonard, a Vietnam veteran. Both are master carpenters. Leonard shared with me some wise words from an elder who had been looking out at the vast expanse of an Alaskan forest. This elder said, “There’s a house in the woods. You just have to go get it. You have to build it.”
    In other words, this community wasn’t waiting for the federal government to act. They got a sawmill and they started building. That is the kind of can-do spirit we need as Alaskans to address this housing shortage.
    Alaska Native Vietnam Veterans Allotments
    I think a number of you know that in my AFN remarks, I like to always talk about—and I certainly don’t have to remind all of you—about Alaska Native Veterans incredible patriotic history of military service to our country. Already this morning, I’ve seen several Alaska Native veterans. If you’re a veteran or a family member of a veteran, could you please stand or raise your hand to be recognized by this audience?
    You all know this, but it bears repeating: Generation after generation, Alaska Native people have served our country in the military at higher rates than any other ethnic group in America. That is what I call special patriotism, particularly when they were still facing shameful discrimination back home.
    Alaska Vietnam veterans really got hit hard. They were serving their country when, let’s face it, a lot of Americans were avoiding service. They came home, and because they were Vietnam Vets, many were treated disgracefully.
    This happened to my good friend Bill Thomas who said one day he was fishing in Haines, the next day he was in bootcamp at Fort Lewis, and then sent to the jungles of Vietnam.
    Nearly two years later, after his combat tour, Bill was flown to California, dazed, the smell of jungle still on his skin, fear still in his gut. On the way to being discharged, he had to drive past a group of protestors, yelling despicable things at him.
    On top of that, Bill, like so many other Alaska Native Vietnam veterans missed the deadline to apply for their Native allotment—the one that they were legally entitled to but missed because they were serving their country in a war overseas. His story was not unique.
    So working with many of you here—I see Benno Cleveland and others—I was able to pass my Vietnam Veterans Allotment Act in 2019 that righted this injustice. That is now the law. It gave our Alaska Native Vietnam veterans the ability to apply for a Native allotment.
    Unfortunately, the implementation of this bill has been dismal, despite Secretary Haaland’s commitment to me on making this a priority of hers.
    In the past four years, the Department of Interior has only certified 38 Alaska Native Vietnam-era [Veteran] allotments out of the over 2,000 Alaska Native Vietnam veterans who were eligible for this. That’s a disgrace and time is running out.
    That’s why I’ve introduced a new bill to extend the Alaska Native Vietnam Veterans Allotment Program for five more years, and importantly, to expand the lands available, particularly in Southeast, where we have such a high number of Vietnam veterans and where it’s been very challenging for our Vietnam veterans to get land close to their home.
    Here’s the challenge on my bill, and I’m going to need AFN’s help on this one: Every radical Lower 48 environmental group is going to come out and try to kill my bill. They don’t want Alaska Natives to have their own land and they certainly don’t want to honor our Vietnam veterans’ heroic service. We all need to fight back against them. Our cause is just. Our cause is so very just on this bill.
    I’m hoping that AFN and others—I’ve asked the Alaska Native Brotherhood, the Alaska Native Sisterhood—we can all work together and support my bill and continue to bring justice to our Alaska Native Vietnam veterans.
    Vietnam Veterans Resolution
    Finally, as it relates to our Vietnam veterans, like Bill Thomas and Benno and so many others, I was recently able to pass a Senate resolution—which, by the way, passed in the Senate unanimously—commending our Vietnam veterans for their courage and sacrifice. The resolution urges the President, on behalf of the Congress, to formally acknowledge the widespread mistreatment of our Vietnam veterans when they came back home.
    It offers a long overdue apology, and it calls for increased education in our schools, for our children, to learn about and understand and respect the courage and sacrifice of these heroes during the Vietnam War.
    Kake and Angoon
    There is another apology that I want to mention. This one also relates to our military. I think many know that I deeply respect our military. Last February, I retired from the Marines Corps after 30 years of service.
    But that doesn’t mean our military is perfect. No organization is perfect.
    I believe that in instances where our country has fallen short of our ideals and has harmed our own citizens, then an apology can be the right thing to do and it’s an important gesture for reconciliation.
    The egregious and unwarranted U.S. military assaults on the Alaska Native people of Kake and Angoon in the late 1800s is such a case.
    When Dr. Rosita Worl brought these historic wrongs to my attention, and mentioned the Tlingit people’s decades-long pursuit of recognition and an apology, I told my team in the Senate that we would work tirelessly with Alaska Native leaders to press this issue at the highest levels of the United States Navy and the Pentagon until these communities received an appropriate apology. That’s what we were able to do.
    Last month, some of you may have seen it, hopefully some of you were there, the U.S. Navy held a ceremony to present the apology in Kake—an official ceremony. There will be another ceremony in Angoon in a few days. Julie and I will be looking forward to attending.
    I am hopeful that these recognition ceremonies will help provide healing and importantly, show our youth that our country is so strong that it can admit its mistakes to become even stronger.
    Arctic and National Security
    Finally, let me turn to an issue that I have heard about from so many of you in your communities and where I want to compliment our brave Alaska-based military.
    We all know it’s becoming an increasingly dangerous world. We are in a new era of authoritarian aggression with dictators in Beijing, Moscow, Iran and North Korea on the march and working together. As Alaskans, we are on the front lines of this new Cold War. We’ve seen this with dramatically increased joint Chinese and Russian patrols in the air and on the seas, near our shores and our skies. You’ve seen these photos—Chinese bombers, Russian subs, Russian fighters near our aircraft. Very aggressive. Our military here has done a great job of protecting our country, just like Alaska Natives have done over the decades.
    Throughout history, our Alaska Native people have courageously served and defended our country. Think about it: the Alaska Territorial Guard, the Eskimo Scouts, the Tlingit code talkers. And of course, as I mentioned earlier, the super high number of Alaska Natives who serve their country in uniform. I’m absolutely confident that with this strong legacy of patriotism and service and a continued build-up of our own military here in Alaska, which I am very focused on, we as a country and as a state will once again prevail over these authoritarian dictatorships.
    Internships
    So let me end with one final plea. It’s related back to the theme of our youth and the theme of this conference. It’s just a pitch from my office. We have a very robust internship program. Representative Peltola yesterday mentioned one young Alaska Native leader, Sam Hiratsuka, who started in my office as an intern. He rose in my office, then went to Mary’s office, and just two days ago, was the youth speaker at the AFN Elders and Youth Conference. Sam is doing a great job and is showing the next generation of leaders how to lead.
    So here’s my pitch: We need more interns, Alaska Native interns. I have information at my booth, and I urge all of you to spread the word.
    We need our Alaska Native people working on Native issues in all branches of our federal government. It’s a great experience for them. They are the future, and we want to encourage that kind of service. With that, to the leadership of AFN, to Julie, and others, thank you again. My Julie and I are very honored to be here.
    We always love coming to AFN. Thank you, everybody.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Rider of a motorcycle detected speeding in the Central Highlands

    Source: Tasmania Police

    Rider of a motorcycle detected speeding in the Central Highlands

    Sunday, 20 October 2024 – 5:19 pm.

    Over the weekend police in the Central Highlands area conducted a traffic operation targeting speeding drivers.
    Unfortunately, the rider of a motorcycle was detected speeding at 151km/h in the posted 100km/h zone and received a four month disqualification and a $1,161.50 fine.
    Another driver on good behaviour for driving offences was detected speeding at 133km/h in the posted 100km/h zone and received five demerit points and a $606 fine and will likely lose his licence.
    An additional six drivers were detected speeding in built up residential areas within Miena & Bothwell over a three hour period.
    Remember speeding puts not only your life at risk, but the lives of other road users and pedestrians as well.
    Police in the Central Highlands will continue to target this type of offending and could be anywhere at any time.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Save the Children statement: ‘Rohingya refugees must be given humanitarian assistance and protection’

    Source: Save the Children

    Save the Children is calling for Indonesia and other countries in Asia to provide protection and humanitarian assistance to Rohingya refugees after a boat carrying more than 100 Rohingya, including women and children, was sighted off the coast of Indonesia.
    The wooden fishing boat is carrying more than 100 Rohingya refugees according to local authorities and fishermen and is anchored around 5 kilometers off the coast of South Aceh[1]. This is the first boat carrying Rohingya refugees to arrive in Indonesia since March 2024.
    It was not immediately clear where the boat has come from. Earlier in the week local fishermen and authorities said they had discovered in the sea the body of a woman thought to be a Rohingya woman, but it was not immediately clear if the woman was a passenger on the boat.
    From November 2023 to date, at least 15 boats carrying more than 2,000 Rohingya refugees (73% of whom are women and children) landed in Aceh and North Sumatra, Indonesia, a staggering 298% increase from the 574 people who arrived in 2022.[2]
    While many have since departed Indonesia, around 1,000 remain in informal and temporary accommodation in Aceh, North Sumatra, and Riau Provinces.[3]
    Fadli Usman, Humanitarian Director at Save the Children in Indonesia, said:
    “Nobody should have to put their lives at risk to make perilous journeys by sea in search of a better life, but this is sadly the reality for Rohingya refugees who have undertaken dangerous sea journeys, often in boats that are not sea worthy, to seek protection, to access livelihoods and education, and to reunite with families.
    “Indonesia has displayed strong solidarity and humanity in the past by allowing Rohingya refugees to disembark and should continue to do so. We’re also calling on governments in Asia, including Indonesia, to honour their international commitments and provide humanitarian assistance to Rohingya refugees, including children. Around 40% of Rohingya arrivals in Indonesia so far this year have been children. Among other horrors, these children are at risk of physical abuse, malnutrition, gender-based violence and exploitation. No child should have to go through the ordeals that Rohingya children do during these journeys. We must ensure that the Rohingya are not forgotten.”
    Save the Children is also calling on the international community to take on their share of responsibility, by stepping up financial support for Rohingya refugees arriving on boats to Indonesia and other countries in the region.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Humanising AI could lead us to dehumanise ourselves

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Raffaele F Ciriello, Senior Lecturer in Business Information Systems, University of Sydney

    Shutterstock

    Irish writer John Connolly once said:

    The nature of humanity, its essence, is to feel another’s pain as one’s own, and to act to take that pain away.

    For most of our history, we believed empathy was a uniquely human trait – a special ability that set us apart from machines and other animals. But this belief is now being challenged.

    As AI becomes a bigger part of our lives, entering even our most intimate spheres, we’re faced with a philosophical conundrum: could attributing human qualities to AI diminish our own human essence? Our research suggests it can.

    Digitising companionship

    In recent years, AI “companion” apps such as Replika have attracted millions of users. Replika allows users to create custom digital partners to engage in intimate conversations. Members who pay for Replika Pro can even turn their AI into a “romantic partner”.

    Physical AI companions aren’t far behind. Companies such as JoyLoveDolls are selling interactive sex robots with customisable features including breast size, ethnicity, movement and AI responses such as moaning and flirting.

    While this is currently a niche market, history suggests today’s digital trends will become tomorrow’s global norms. With about one in four adults experiencing loneliness, the demand for AI companions will grow.

    The dangers of humanising AI

    Humans have long attributed human traits to non-human entities – a tendency known as anthropomorphism. It’s no surprise we’re doing this with AI tools such as ChatGPT, which appear to “think” and “feel”. But why is humanising AI a problem?

    For one thing, it allows AI companies to exploit our tendency to form attachments with human-like entities. Replika is marketed as “the AI companion who cares”. However, to avoid legal issues, the company elsewhere points out Replika isn’t sentient and merely learns through millions of user interactions.

    Some AI companies overtly claim their AI assistants have empathy and can even anticipate human needs. Such claims are misleading and can take advantage of people seeking companionship. Users may become deeply emotionally invested if they believe their AI companion truly understands them.

    This raises serious ethical concerns. A user will hesitate to delete (that is, to “abandon” or “kill”) their AI companion once they’ve ascribed some kind of sentience to it.

    But what happens when said companion unexpectedly disappears, such as if the user can no longer afford it, or if the company that runs it shuts down? While the companion may not be real, the feelings attached to it are.

    Empathy – more than a programmable output

    By reducing empathy to a programmable output, do we risk diminishing its true essence? To answer this, let’s first think about what empathy really is.

    Empathy involves responding to other people with understanding and concern. It’s when you share your friend’s sorrow as they tell you about their heartache, or when you feel joy radiating from someone you care about. It’s a profound experience – rich and beyond simple forms of measurement.

    A fundamental difference between humans and AI is that humans genuinely feel emotions, while AI can only simulate them. This touches on the hard problem of consciousness, which questions how subjective human experiences arise from physical processes in the brain.

    Science has yet to solve the hard problem of consciousness.
    Shutterstock

    While AI can simulate understanding, any “empathy” it purports to have is a result of programming that mimics empathetic language patterns. Unfortunately, AI providers have a financial incentive to trick users into growing attached to their seemingly empathetic products.

    The dehumanAIsation hypothesis

    Our “dehumanAIsation hypothesis” highlights the ethical concerns that come with trying to reduce humans to some basic functions that can be replicated by a machine. The more we humanise AI, the more we risk dehumanising ourselves.

    For instance, depending on AI for emotional labour could make us less tolerant of the imperfections of real relationships. This could weaken our social bonds and even lead to emotional deskilling. Future generations may become less empathetic – losing their grasp on essential human qualities as emotional skills continue to be commodified and automated.

    Also, as AI companions become more common, people may use them to replace real human relationships. This would likely increase loneliness and alienation – the very issues these systems claim to help with.

    AI companies’ collection and analysis of emotional data also poses significant risks, as these data could be used to manipulate users and maximise profit. This would further erode our privacy and autonomy, taking surveillance capitalism to the next level.

    Holding providers accountable

    Regulators need to do more to hold AI providers accountable. AI companies should be honest about what their AI can and can’t do, especially when they risk exploiting users’ emotional vulnerabilities.

    Exaggerated claims of “genuine empathy” should be made illegal. Companies making such claims should be fined – and repeat offenders shut down.

    Data privacy policies should also be clear, fair and without hidden terms that allow companies to exploit user-generated content.

    We must preserve the unique qualities that define the human experience. While AI can enhance certain aspects of life, it can’t – and shouldn’t – replace genuine human connection.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Humanising AI could lead us to dehumanise ourselves – https://theconversation.com/humanising-ai-could-lead-us-to-dehumanise-ourselves-240803

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Average speed camera trial to investigate safety dividend

    Source: New South Wales Government 2

    Headline: Average speed camera trial to investigate safety dividend

    Published: 21 October 2024

    Released by: Minister for Regional Transport and Roads, Minister for Roads


    Previously, average speed cameras have only been used in NSW to monitor the speed of heavy vehicles. Road safety benefits will be evaluated when a trial of average speed cameras for light vehicles is conducted from next year.

    Legislation that passed NSW Parliament has enabled their use for all vehicles, bringing the state into line with all other Australian mainland states and the ACT where the technology is an integral part of their speed enforcement programs.

    The NSW Government will now trial the lifesaving benefits of average speed cameras as part of efforts to combat the rising road toll which today stands at 271 – two more than at the same date in 2023.

    The average speed camera trial will build on road safety initiatives introduced by the Minns Labor Government, including:

    • Seatbelt enforcement by the existing mobile phone camera detection network
    • Removing a loophole to force all motorists driving on a foreign licence to convert to a NSW licence within six months
    • The demerit return trial that rewarded more than 1.2 million drivers for maintaining a demerit-offence-free driving record during the initial 12-month period up to 16 January 2024
    • Doubling roadside enforcement sites used for mobile speed cameras, with the addition of 2,700 new locations where a camera can be deployed. Enforcement hours will remain the same
    • Hosting the state’s first Road Safety Forum of international and local experts
    • Signed National Road Safety Data Agreement with the Commonwealth

    Speeding is the biggest killer on NSW roads, contributing to 41 per cent of all fatalities over the past decade.

    Regional NSW is home to a third of the population but is where two-thirds of all road deaths happen.

    Two trials will be conducted on limited stretches of highway in regional NSW to assess whether these measures reduce speeding at these locations, improving safety and preventing injuries and fatalities. The trial areas are:

    • Pacific Highway between Kew and Lake Innes (Port Macquarie) – 15kms between cameras
    • Hume Highway between Coolac and Gundagai – 16kms between cameras

    There were a combined total of six fatalities and 33 serious injuries between 2018 and 2022 at these locations.

    Road safety experts have backed the use of average speed cameras and the NRMA will be part of the assessment process to ensure drivers have a voice in the review of the trial. 

    Transport for NSW will now work on the technical elements and deliver a communications campaign to inform motorists about the trial to begin mid-2025.

    Trials are proposed to begin with a 60-day period in which speeding drivers will receive a warning letter rather than a fine before normal enforcement, including fines and demerit points, begin.

    Minister for Roads John Graham said:

    “This is the right time to investigate whether lives can be saved by the use of average speed cameras for all vehicles, not only trucks.

    “This technology has been found to be effective in other states and in the UK, Norway, Italy and the Netherlands.

    “It is our responsibility to properly evaluate whether they are effective in preventing another family and another friendship circle from being devastated – which is the sad result every time someone dies on NSW roads.

    “Before trials begin next year, the NSW Government will conduct a comprehensive awareness campaign so the public is aware of average speed cameras and a 60-day warning letter period will give motorists time to adjust to their use in these limited locations.”

    Minister for Regional Transport and Roads Jenny Aitchison said:

    “In 2023, over two thirds of the deaths on our roads were in regional NSW. Our goal is to assess how effective the cameras can be in changing speeding habits and reducing needless deaths.

    “The NSW Government will continue to inform all drivers but particularly the regional communities around these trial sites about how it will work.

    “Unfortunately, on Tuesday night we saw Nationals in the Legislative Council cynically voting against the average speed camera trial, putting politics above the safety of the people they purport to represent.

    “There have been a few times in this Parliament that the Leader of the Nationals has torched the Coalition agreement allegedly on a matter of principle – but saving lives on our roads in the bush? The Nationals are clearly confused about what is important.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: The CFA volunteers who love marrying people

    Source: Victoria Country Fire Authority

    The COVID-19 lockdowns led to an exciting and fulfilling change of direction for CFA volunteers and married couple Greg Thorpe and Anne Tammesild.

    Instead of sitting idle, they both completed a Certificate IV in celebrancy, and now get a lot of joy from marrying people – especially fellow CFA volunteers.

    “I retired during the COVID-19 pandemic after being an air traffic controller for 43 years,” Greg said. “Anne saw me getting bored and suggested I find something new to do. I said I wouldn’t mind being a marriage celebrant, and Anne replied that she’d like to do that too.”

    Greg and Anne both completed their certificate IV in about nine months, but because of COVID-19 they weren’t able to get their new business off the ground the way they had hoped.

    Greg and Anne, who live in Hampton, are members of District 8 Headquarters Brigade where they are learning new skills to work in an Incident Control Centre. Before moving to Hampton, Greg had been a firefighter with St Andrews Fire Brigade since 2008, and the impact of the 2009 fires on Greg and those around him prompted him to become a peer in CFA’s Peer Support Program.

    “At St Andrews I got really interested in firefighting and learned a range of skills. Then after 2009 I also wanted to help fellow volunteers, so I trained to be a peer supporter,” Greg said. 

    Greg and Anne love marrying people, and are happy to conduct weddings in addition to having daytime jobs.

    “We aim to do 15 weddings a year in between my part-time job as the manager of emergency management and business continuity across 51 magistrates’ courts, and Anne’s full-time teaching role.”

    Anne became a CFA member about a year ago after many years as a Life Saving Victoria volunteer where she was a district assessor and trainer. She now wants to contribute to the operation of CFA Incident Control Centres.

    Greg and Anne approach a wedding as a team. Although only one celebrant can legally marry a couple, they both attend the wedding.

    “We do it together because we enjoy it so much,” Greg said. “If Anne conducts the ceremony, I’ll be the roadie and set everything up. It brings us a lot of joy. After the wedding, we walk away with a big smile. We’re not in it to make much money but to marry people and make them happy.

    “I see how much work CFA members devote to supporting their communities and we like to give back by marrying them for a reasonable fee. We’re not worried about travelling a long distance to marry CFA people – we just turn the occasion into a weekend away.”

    One happy occasion was when Greg married CFA employee Jacinta McMahon and her partner Tim late last year in their backyard with about 30 guests. Their beloved dog Bundy was the ring bearer.

    Greg and Anne discuss each wedding together and writing the couple’s love story is a joint effort.

    “Having two celebrants who know all the documents and the members of the bridal party means that either of us can conduct the ceremony. If I was sick, Anne could take the ceremony and vice versa. Fortunately, that hasn’t been a problem,” Greg said.

    Submitted by News and Media

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: ‘Helpful insight’ into issues of static fishing gear and safety tips

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Hazards relating to poorly marked equipment, and consideration of how these can be avoided, feature in a new report and safety leaflet for fishers.

    The Static Fishing Gear Safety Working Group Report 2024 dives into the problems relating to the marking and rigging of static fishing gear (fishing equipment that is set in place and does not move), UK regulations, and what can be improved.

    The report was produced by the Static Fishing Gear Safety Working Group, a sub-group of the MCA’s United Kingdom Safety of Navigation Committee, which is made up of industry representatives, government representatives and subject matter experts.

    The report identifies two main hazards associated with this equipment. The first is the use of floating rope on or near the water’s surface, instead of leaded or weighted, posing a risk to nearby vessels with propellers. The second is the failure to use a buoy, or similar, to visually alert other vessels that static fishing gear is in use in the area.

    UK and Scottish legislation is considered in the report, and a number of recommendations are made, to improve awareness and visibility of static fishing gear.

    A safety leaflet attached to the report provides guidance on best practice for the marking of static fishing gear, and ways to improve its visibility to reduce the risk of entanglement. The simple guidelines are visually presented for ease of use.

    MCA Assistant Director for UK Technical Services Navigation Richard Bell said:

    This report gives a helpful insight into the issues around static fishing gear and what can be done to mitigate safety risks. There is no overnight solution to the issues raised, but we hope this report raises awareness with a view to improving safety.

    Our priority, both here at the MCA and UKSON, will always be the safety of mariners users, and we hope the safety leaflet encourages fishers to follow or maintain best practice when it comes to static fishing gear.

    Here you can access the Static Fishing Gear Safety Working Group Report 2024 and the Static Fishing Gear: Design of ends safety guidance leaflet.

    Press office

    Email public.relations@mcga.gov.uk

    Press enquiries (Monday to Friday, 9am-5pm) 0203 817 2222

    Outside these hours or on bank holidays and weekends, for media enquiries ONLY, please send an email outlining your query and putting #Urgent in the subject title.

    Updates to this page

    Published 21 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-Evening Report: Draft guidelines for ‘forever chemicals’ have been released. Here’s what it means for drinking water safety in Australia

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ian Musgrave, Senior lecturer in Pharmacology, University of Adelaide

    Alexander_Safonov/Shutterstock

    The Australian National Health and Medical research Council (NHMRC) has today released draft guidelines for acceptable levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, in drinking water.

    PFAS chemicals are also known as “forever chemicals”, because they don’t break down easily and can persist in the environment, including drinking water supplies.

    The new guidelines – which are not mandatory but will inform state and territory policy – are expected to be finalised in April 2025. They propose a reduction in the maximum levels previously considered safe for four key PFAS chemicals: PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS and PFBS.

    Continually scrutinising and updating our PFAS regulations is important to ensure Australians’ safety. However, these updated guidelines are unlikely to have a significant impact on Australia’s drinking water. The majority of potable water supplies in Australia either have no detectable PFAS, or have levels already below the new limits.

    What are PFAS chemicals?

    PFAS are highly fat-soluble compounds that are very slow to break down. They are basically long chains of carbon atoms studded with fluorine molecules.

    PFAS chemicals are inert, water-repellent and heat-resistant. These properties make them ideal for industrial usage and they have been used in firefighting foams and fire-retardant material. They have also been used in common household items such as nonstick pans and stain-resistant fabrics.

    PFAS chemicals are very slow to break down.
    Gorodenkoff/Shutterstock

    Unfortunately, their useful industrial stability means they persist in the environment and can accumulate in the human body. It can take five years for half an ingested dose of PFAS to be removed.

    Given PFAS chemicals have the potential to mimic the body’s own fats, there has been concern they could harm our health if sufficient amounts accumulated in the body.

    What sorts of health effects are they linked to?

    The buildup of a chemical that’s hard to remove from our bodies is always of concern. Despite this, the potential health risks appear to be low. In 2018 the Australian Expert Health Panel for PFAS looked in detail at the evidence.

    One of the largest concerns was PFAS chemicals’ ability to increase levels of cholesterol in the blood, potentially increasing heart disease risk. However, studies of people who have been chronically exposed to significant levels of PFOA have not shown statistically significant increases in heart disease.

    In 2018, the report from Australia’s expert health panel stated:

    Evidence to date does not establish whether PFAS at exposure levels seen in Australia might increase risks of cardiovascular disease… Established risk factors … are likely to be of a much greater magnitude than those potentially caused by PFAS.

    Cancer has also been a concern. However the expert panel found no consistent evidence that PFAS chemicals are associated with cancer. One study even found exposure to PFOA decreased the incidence of bowel cancer.

    However, the impact of PFAS on human health is continuously reviewed as new evidence comes to light.

    Why has Australia revised its drinking water guidelines?

    Australia began to phase out PFAS chemicals in the early 2000s. Since then, the levels of PFAS detected in the Australian population have steadily dropped.

    Now that industrial use is being phased out, the main way we are exposed to PFAS is through things like persistent environmental contamination. While drinking water is not a major source of PFAS, water can be contaminated from environmental sources, for example, if contaminated dust or ground water makes its way into reservoirs.

    Most drinking water levels in Australia either have no detectable PFAS or are already below the new levels.
    Juergen_Wallstabe/Shutterstock

    The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines provide limits for how much PFAS is allowed to be in our drinking water.

    The NHMRC periodically reviews the health evidence around PFAS used to develop these guidelines, which were last updated in 2018. The latest review looks at additional evidence available since then.

    A few developments were of particular interest in this review: studies about the influence of PFAS on thyroid function. Altering thyroid function can be problematic because thyroid hormones regulate our metabolism, growth and development.

    The International Agency for Cancer Research’s (IARC) recent ruling on PFAS and cancer also needed to be investigated. The IARC has classified PFOS – one of the four key chemicals Australia is regulating – as “possibly carcinogenic to humans”. However the IARC noted there was “inadequate” evidence PFOS directly causes any type of cancer in people.

    This agency can rule on the probability that a chemical can cause cancer under any possible exposure, no matter how extreme. But it doesn’t evaluate the risk of cancer from ordinary exposure.

    This means the NHMRC needed to reevaluate the evidence that the levels present in drinking water would constitute a risk.

    What are the new PFAS limits?

    The NHRMC considered evidence about PFAS exposure in animal studies, and by looking at human epidemiology.

    In studies involving animals, the NHMRC review paid particular attention to what concentration of PFAS exposure had no effect on their health. This threshold is used to determine limits for humans, by adding a safety buffer usually a hundred times lower than the level that was safe for animals.

    The limits are set are carefully considering the evidence about impact on human health, as well as evaluating how much PFAS exposure is likely from sources beyond drinking water, such as food and inhaled dust.

    The proposed limits are:

    Note: PFOS and PFHxS are now regulated separately.
    NHMRC

    These guidelines are unlikely to have a significant impact on health. As the NHMRC report shows, majority of potable water supplies in Australia have no detectable PFAS, or levels are already below these new limits.

    For example, drinking water sampling for WaterNSW found PFOS levels were between 1.2ng/L and undectable. Similar results were found for PFHxS (between 1.4 and 0.1ng/L) and PFOA (basically undetectable).

    While the concentration of PFAS in bores near contamination sites are higher, these are typically not used as sources of drinking water.

    The Australian guidelines differ from some international guidelines. The draft guidelines note that different jurisdictions place different weighting on animal and human evidence, and this will affect these regulatory levels.

    The draft guidelines are now open to public consultation, with submissions closing on November 22 2024. Final guidelines are expected to be released in April 2025.

    Ian Musgrave has received funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council to study adverse reactions to herbal medicines and has previously been funded by the Australian Research Council to study potential natural product treatments for Alzheimer’s disease. He has collaborated with SA Water on studies of cyanobacterial toxins and their implication for drinking water quality.

    ref. Draft guidelines for ‘forever chemicals’ have been released. Here’s what it means for drinking water safety in Australia – https://theconversation.com/draft-guidelines-for-forever-chemicals-have-been-released-heres-what-it-means-for-drinking-water-safety-in-australia-241773

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Message of the Holy Father for the centenary of the “Corriere dello Sport-Stadio”

    Source: The Holy See

    Message of the Holy Father for the centenary of the “Corriere dello Sport-Stadio”, 20.10.2024
    The following is the text of the message sent by the Holy Father Francis to the Corriere dello Sport-Stadio on the occasion of the centenary of its founding:

    Message of the Holy Father
    Dear brothers and sisters,
    Best wishes! A hundred years is an important milestone, a fine trophy to put in your cabinet! Even greater than that for the two million copies sold on the occasion of Italy’s victory in the 2006 World Cup! You have had a great run in these hundred years; besides, among those who contributed to the birth of the newspaper was a certain Enzo Ferrari, who knew something about engines and victories!
    I thank the Director Ivan Zazzaroni for sending me a beautiful letter about the centenary of the newspaper, and it is a pleasure to be close to you on these days of celebration.
    If I think about sport, and my homeland, Argentina, before I even think of the great football facilities, like the Bombonera, I think of when, as children, we played football with a ball made of rags. So many champions started this way, playing with friends in a carefree way on improvised fields between houses, even in contexts of great poverty. How beautiful it is to experience the feeling of fraternity: you play, and you play together, and you know that you are opponents only on the field, never enemies. You learn the joy of victory and you know the sweat and effort it cost, and you also learn from defeat, trying to get back up again and learn from the mistakes made so as to try to overcome them the next time, or simply to accept your own difference and your limit: we are all precious and unique, but we are not perfect.
    Some say that I am a fan of San Lorenzo, an Argentine team: it remains a secret, but there is something beautiful in the history of that team. When the boys who played in the street at the beginning of the twentieth century were looking for a safe place to play football, a priest descended from Italians, a Salesian, Don Lorenzo Massa, opened the doors of the oratory, and a beautiful adventure began from there. Even today we need spaces for sport, especially in the poorest and most isolated contexts, but above all we need adults who welcome children and young people in an authentic way, who know how to listen to their dreams, who wish for a better future with them. Think about how here in Italy how much good has been done through the fields of parishes and oratories, and how many young people, now sporting champions, often remember that they started from the parish fields.
    Your newspaper has a long history, and it intends to embrace the whole of Italy, for sporting events that concern it both within its borders and abroad: sport is one of the factors that make us feel like one people, such as when we stand up to sing the national anthem, at the stadium or in sports halls. How important it is to walk together, to feel part of a single family, and of a family of nations during the Olympics or the world or continental championships: in recent years we have still too often seen neighbouring peoples, or groups within the same countries, stand up against each other armed. Competition in sport is healthy, because it calls for patience, listening to the coach, respect for opponents, rules and referees, and coordination with one’s teammates: in the world, on the other hand, the aim is often to destroy the opponent, to make one’s own rules, to reject those who want to moderate the confrontation between the parties according to international law. Spreading a healthy sports culture in this sense means nurturing humanity in its most beautiful and authentic values, and for this I thank you.
    Although unfortunately in recent years we have witnessed episodes of intolerance, which must be condemned, I am sure that there are many more examples in which sport has been able to “team up”, without race, class, or religious denomination being obstacles or barriers: I encourage you to foster this climate of authentic and welcoming humanity. We must reject any mindset of exclusion and violence, and for this we know that words have their value, to educate in what is good and beautiful, rather than to destroy. A newspaper article, even a sports article, can do a lot of good, but it can also damage and foment a climate of mistrust: I urge you not to be like this, though!
    On the subject of acceptance and integral human promotion: for organizational reasons alone it is not possible to hold the Olympics and the Paralympics at the same time. In the recent editions in Paris we rejoiced at the many successes of incredible boys and girls: for some of them the gold medal was life-giving, because of how they were able to overcome, thanks to their inner strength and the help of everyone, the challenges of their disability. Their races are a hymn to life! May your newspaper tell of victories and defeats, but be a way of thinking and living of sport as a hymn to life!
    Thank you for what you are and for what you do. Do not forget to pray for me.
    Rome, Saint John Lateran, 19 October 2024
    FRANCIS

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: The “life situation” service for large families has been launched on the public services portal

    MILES AXLE Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    A service for providing services to large families has been launched on the public services portal. The service’s special feature is that the services that large families need are located in one place and are provided comprehensively according to the “life situation” principle.

    You can already register as a large family and receive an electronic certificate. The service allows you to save time on visiting departments and searching for information on registration of payments, benefits and documents. Reference information on measures to support large families, a list of institutions that accept electronic certificates, and the ability to leave feedback on the quality of services are also provided on a single page “life situation”.

    Provision of services based on the principle of “life situations” is part of the federal project “State for People”. The implementation of the federal project “State for People” is supervised by Deputy Prime Minister – Head of the Government Staff Dmitry Grigorenko.

    “The “life situation” service for large families will help citizens not only to receive government services easier and faster, but also to choose options for joint leisure from the list that is presented and will be supplemented on the government services portal. Close people will be able to pay attention to each other instead of visiting departments to process documents,” said Dmitry Grigorenko.

    The list of state services for large families that can be obtained on the single page of the “life situation” service is planned to be expanded in the future. For example, it will be possible to register with a clinic, apply for a one-time payment at the birth of a child and a monthly social payment for children.

    It will also be possible to receive government services that are part of the “life situation” in a proactive format. Without additional visits and requests, it will be possible to receive a social payment to provide children with school and sports uniforms, monthly cash payments for travel for large families.

    In addition, large families will receive targeted notifications. For example, when receiving a compulsory medical insurance policy, a notification will be sent about the need to register the child with a clinic.

    The list of benefits that large families will be able to receive using an electronic certificate by showing a QR code from the State Services application will also be expanded.

    The program for using QR codes to confirm the status of a large family began with providing benefits for visiting museums. In the future, it will be expanded to other cultural institutions, such as theaters. As well as zoos and additional state, municipal and commercial services.

    For example, it will be possible to obtain a discounted subscription for a child to attend additional education institutions, physical education and sports organizations, and also receive discounts on train and air tickets.

    In addition, it is already possible to use the electronic certificate of a large family to apply for a loyalty card in some retail chains.

    An electronic ID can be used in the same way as a paper one. But the electronic format has a number of significant advantages. The ID is always at hand, on your smartphone. The QR code can be shared with other family members, unlike a paper document, which can only be used by its owner.

    The unification of public services based on the principle of “life situations” represents models of the most common events that people encounter. At the moment, 15 federal “life situations” have been launched on the portals of public services and “MSP.RF”.

    These include services such as “Participation in sports competitions”, “Going on a hunting and fishing trip”, “Getting into an emergency situation”, “Organizing cargo logistics”, “Opening a private school”, “Opening a pharmacy”, “Opening a tourist site”.

    To date, more than 1.4 million people have used the “life situations” services.

    By combining government services according to the principle of “life situations”, their receipt has become significantly easier. The average number of documents that must be submitted within the framework of one “life situation” has decreased from 34 to 25.

    The average number of in-person visits required to agencies to receive government services within one “life situation” has decreased by 4.5 times: 18 in-person visits were required, but now there are 4.

    The total time to receive government services within one “life situation” has decreased by an average of 37 days – from 113 to 76. By the end of 2024, it is planned to launch 34 “life situations” at the federal level.

    Work on the implementation of “life situations” is also underway at the regional level. It is planned that 85 regional “life situations” will be launched by the end of 2024.

    The federal project “State for People” is included in the list of initiatives for the socio-economic development of Russia; its implementation has been carried out at the federal and regional levels of government since 2021.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    http://government.ru/nevs/53064/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI China: Towering rice in southwest China unlocks agricultural potentials

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    CHONGQING, Oct. 21 — Autumn is in full swing across China, and with it comes the bustling season of harvest. Wang Disheng, standing at some 170 centimeters tall, steps into a rice paddy only to find himself nearly “drowned” by the towering rice stalks.

    “These rice plants are essentially twice as tall as the regular ones, earning them the nickname ‘giant rice.’ Some of these giants can even surpass 220 centimeters in height,” said Wang, deputy head of Shiwan Township in Dazu District, southwest China’s Chongqing Municipality.

    Shiwan began cultivating this giant rice in 2021, following the establishment of a research center by the China National Hybrid Rice R&D Center in the area. The Chongqing branch has gathered a multitude of experts focusing on space mutation breeding, hybrid rice breeding and new variety testing, among other research areas.

    “We are currently experimenting with over five new hybrid rice varieties, including those with low heavy metal accumulation, saline-alkali tolerance, and selenium-rich rice,” said Luo Zhiqiang, office director of the Chongqing branch.

    China, recognized as the primary cradle of rice worldwide, saw a monumental achievement in 1973 when the late scientist Yuan Longping, affectionately known as the “father of hybrid rice,” and his team successfully developed the world’s first high-yielding hybrid rice strain, alleviating hunger for human beings.

    “Our work continues to unlock the potential of hybrid rice, enabling it to thrive in diverse environments, as part of our efforts to benefit an even broader range of people,” Luo said, noting that the hybrid rice technologies have been introduced to many countries in need.

    According to Luo, Sri Lanka, one of the Belt and Road partner countries in South Asia, is seeking cooperation with the Chongqing branch.

    “Due to local soil conditions, Sri Lanka is in dire need of saline-tolerant rice, which aligns perfectly with our research focus,” Luo said, adding that experts from both sides frequently meet to discuss further collaboration. They plan to introduce new hybrid rice varieties and innovative technologies to Sri Lanka, and conduct technician training, aiming to increase rice production and farmers’ income.

    Statistics released by the China International Development Cooperation Agency earlier this month show that hybrid rice has been introduced to nearly 70 countries across five continents, significantly boosting rice yields in many African countries from an average of 2 tonnes to 7.5 tonnes per hectare.

    In Shiwan, after the recent rice harvest, crayfish are bred in the paddies. The crayfish consume pests and their waste serves as a natural fertilizer for the rice.

    “This is one of the reasons we are experimenting with giant rice. The deep waters of the giant rice paddies provide an ideal habitat for crayfish,” Wang said.

    “Previously, we could only earn about 2,000 yuan (about 281 U.S. dollars) per mu (about 667 square meters) of rice land. Now, with the rice and crayfish rotation model, we can earn 6,000 to 10,000 yuan per mu,” Liu Bo, a local farmer, said.

    The giant rice and the variety of other rice types have also attracted many visitors. In response, Shiwan has transformed some of its paddies into picturesque scenic spots. Annually, the township now welcomes tens of thousands of visitors and around 30,000 students on educational tours, according to local authorities.

    China continues to prioritize food security, as it feeds over 1.4 billion people with just 9 percent of the world’s arable land. An array of measures have been implemented across the country to improve grain output over recent years, including the construction of more high-standard farmland and the promotion of agricultural technologies.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Meloë Kacenelenbogen Eyes the Future of Air Quality, Climate Research

    Source: NASA

    A mentor of research scientist Meloë Kacenelenbogen once shared a sentiment from French author André Gide: “You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore.” Kacenelenbogen pushes beyond her comfort zone to explore the unknown.
    Name: Meloë S. KacenelenbogenFormal Job Classification: Research scientistOrganization: Climate and Radiation Laboratory, Science Directorate (Code 613)

    What do you do and what is most interesting about your role here at Goddard?
    I study the impact of aerosols — suspended particles from, for example, wildfire smoke, desert dust, urban pollution, and volcanic eruptions — on air quality and the Earth’s climate. I use space, air, and ground-based observations, as well as models.
    Why did you become a scientist? What is your educational background?
    I never made a deliberate choice to become a scientist. I started with very little confidence as a child and then built up my confidence by achieving things I thought I could not do. I chose the hardest fields to work on along the way. Science looked hard and so did fluid mechanics, remote sensing, and atmospheric physics. I have failed many times, but I always learn something and move on. I do get scared and maybe even paralyzed for a day or two, but I never let fear or failure immobilize me for long.
    I was born in Maryland, but my family moved to France when I was young, so I am fluent in French. I have a bachelor’s and master’s degree in mechanical engineering, and physical methods in remote sensing from the Université Pierre et Marie Curie (Paris VI, Jussieu). In 2008, I got a Ph.D. in atmospheric physics for applying satellite remote sensing to air quality at the Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille (USTL), France.
    What are some of your career highlights?
    After my Ph.D., I worked for the Atmospheric Lidar Group at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC), on spaceborne and ground-based lidars. In 2009, I got a NASA Post-doctoral Program (NPP) fellowship at the agency’s Ames Research Center in California’s Silicon Valley, where I worked for 13 years on space-based, aircraft-based, and ground-based atmospheric aerosol vertical distribution and aerosol typing.
    In 2022, I came to work at the Climate and Radiation Lab at Goddard.
    What is most interesting about aerosols?
    Aerosols are very topical because they have a huge impact on the air we breathe and our Earth’s climate. The smaller the aerosol, the deeper it can get into our lungs. Among other sources, aerosols can come from cars, factories, or wildfires. We all know that wildfires are becoming bigger and more frequent. They are expected to happen even more frequently in the future due to climate change. Both when I was living in California and here in Maryland, I have experienced first-hand choking from the wildfire smoke. I will always remember how apocalyptic it felt back in the summer of 2020 in California when wildfire smoke was paired with COVID confinement, and the sky turned Mars-like orange.
    Please tell us about your involvement with the Atmosphere Observing System (AOS)?
    I am incredibly lucky to be able to contribute to the next generation of NASA’s satellites. I am working on AOS, which will observe aerosols, clouds, convention, and precipitation in the Earth’s atmosphere. I am part of the team that is helping design several instruments and algorithms.
    My role is to connect this spaceborne observing system to all our other space, ground, and air-based measurements at the time of launch. We are making a mesh of observations to address the science questions, run the algorithms, and validate the spaceborne measurements. I am constantly pushed to expand my horizon and my own knowledge.
    Why do you enjoy always challenging yourself intellectually?
    I started that way. I had no confidence, so I felt that the only way I could build my confidence was to try doing things that scared me. I may sometimes be a little scared, but I am never bored.
    What did you learn from your mentors?
    A few years ago, a mentor shared a quote from André Gide with me that encapsulates what we are talking about: “You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of the shore.” In other words, it is OK, maybe preferable, to be out of my comfort zone to explore the unknown as scary as it may be.
    Along the way, it has been extremely important for me to deliberately choose mentors. To me, a good mentor has earned the respect of all who have worked with them, is uplifting, reassuring, and gives me the invaluable guidance and support that I need. I deliberately try to surround myself with the right people. I have been very, very fortunate to find incredible people to encourage me.
    As a mentor, what do you advise?
    I tell them to deliberately choose their mentors. I also tell them that it is OK to be uncomfortable. Being uncomfortable is the nature of our field. To do great things, we often need to be uncomfortable.
    Why do you enjoy working on a team?
    I love working on teams, I love to feed off the positive energy of a team whether I lead it or am part of it. In my field, teamwork with a positive energy is incredibly satisfying. Everybody feeds off everybody’s energy, we go further, are stronger, and achieve more. This may not happen often, but when it does it makes it all worth it.
    What are the happiest moments in your career?
    I am always happiest when the team publishes a paper and all our efforts, are encapsulated in that one well-wrapped and satisfying peer-reviewed paper that is then accessible to everyone online. Every paper we publish feels, to me, the same as a Ph.D. in terms of the work, pain, energy, and then, finally, satisfaction involved.
    What do you hope to achieve in your career?
    I want to have been a major contributor to the mission by the time the AOS satellites launch.
    What do you do for fun?
    I do mixed martial arts. I love the ocean, diving, and sailing. I also love going to art galleries, especially to see impressionist paintings to reconnect with my Parisian past.

    Who is your favorite author?
    I love Zweig, Kafka, Dostoyevsky, Saint-Exupéry, and Kessel. The latter two wrote a lot about aviators in the early 1900s back in the days when it was new and very dangerous. Those pilots, like Mermoz, were my heroes growing up.
    Who would you like to thank?
    I would like to thank my family for being my rock.
    What are your guiding principles?
    To paraphrase Dostoevsky, everyone is responsible to all men for all men and for everything. I have a strong sense of purpose, pride, justice, and honor. This is how I try to live my life for better or for worse.
    By Elizabeth M. JarrellNASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.

    Conversations With Goddard is a collection of Q&A profiles highlighting the breadth and depth of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center’s talented and diverse workforce. The Conversations have been published twice a month on average since May 2011. Read past editions on Goddard’s “Our People” webpage.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: CONGRESSMAN JOE MORELLE TAKES ACTION TO ADDRESS CHILDCARE CRISIS, SUPPORT WORKING FAMILIES

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Joe Morelle (NY-25)

    Outlines legislation to lower the cost of childcare and ensure it is accessible for all parents

    October 22, 2024 (Rochester, N.Y.)—Today, Congressman Joe Morelle was joined by the YWCA of Rochester and Monroe County and the Children’s Agenda to announce legislation he supports to ensure quality, affordable childcare is accessible for all working families.

    “I hear every day from parents in our community who are struggling to find safe, reliable, accessible, and affordable childcare. This is a crisis, and we need decisive action to ease the burden on working families,” said Congressman Joe Morelle. “That’s why I’m leading the charge to enact legislation that will reduce the exorbitant cost of childcare, get more children into high-quality programs, and ease the burden on families. I look forward to continuing my work alongside organizations like The Children’s Agenda and the YWCA to support families in our community.”

    “Our commitment to advocating for quality, affordable childcare is unwavering,” said Dr. Myra Henry, President and CEO of YWCA of Rochester and Monroe County. “Access to reliable childcare is crucial for the stability and success for many of the families we serve. The ability to secure quality childcare and early education opportunities for mothers of young children in our programs is often a real struggle.  By supporting efforts to make childcare and early education accessible and affordable, we aim to build a stronger, more inclusive community where parents can be proud of the nurturing support they are providing for their children to thrive.”

    “Every day, families in our community are forced to make impossible choices between their jobs and their children’s care. Quality, affordable childcare should be a right, not a privilege,” said Stevie Vargas, Director of Campaigns & Organizing with The Children’s Agenda. “The legislation Congressman Morelle supports is a critical step toward ensuring all working families have access to the childcare they need to thrive. At The Children’s Agenda, we are committed to advocating for policies that prioritize children’s well-being and give parents the support they deserve. Together, we can create a future where no family is left struggling to find safe and reliable care.”

    Last July, Congressman Morelle warned of an impending “childcare cliff” and outlined immediate actions he supported to restore federal support for parents and childcare centers. Unfortunately, over the last 15 months, Republicans in Congress have ignored the needs of working families and refused to allocate the resources required for these programs, and the impacts of their negligence are being felt across the country.

    Last month, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago reported American families living below the poverty line spent more than one-quarter of their annual income on childcare, and the cost is only continuing to rise. In New York State, another report from the Century Foundation found the cost of childcare has increased by almost 50 percent since 2019, with the average price for an infant at a childcare center now hovering around $19,500 per year or $1,625 per month.

    Congressman Morelle has fought to address this crisis and bring down the cost of childcare by supporting the following legislation:

    • The Child Care for Working Families Act—legislation to help ensure universal access to high-quality childcare by mandating federal investment to establish and support a network of locally-run Child Care and Early Learning Centers and Family Child Care Homes and ensuring no one pays more than 7% of their income on childcare;
    • The After Hours Child Care Act—legislation to establish a pilot program and explore increasing the capacity of childcare providers to provide services to families in which a parent is working nontraditional work hours (e.g., before 9:00 a.m., after 5:00 p.m., or on a Saturday or Sunday);
    • The Child Care Investment Act—legislation to increase the employer-provided child care tax credit, the amount excludable from gross income for dependent care flexible spending accounts, and makes the household and dependent care tax credit refundable.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta, Together with Local, State, and Federal Law Enforcement Partners, Announces Eradication of 774,829 Cannabis Plants and 106,141 Pounds of Illegally-Grown Cannabis Worth over $353 Million

    Source: US State of California

    LOS ANGELES – California Attorney General Rob Bonta, together with local and federal law enforcement partners, today announced the eradication of 774,829 illegally cultivated cannabis plants and 106,141 pounds of processed cannabis, as well as 282 arrests in 36 different counties across California as part of Eradication and Prevention of Illicit Cannabis (EPIC) program. The total underground market price for these seizures is valued at approximately $353 million. EPIC is an interagency task force focused on combating the illegal cannabis market, cannabis enforcement work, and investigating and prosecuting civil and criminal cases with a focus on environmental, economic, and labor impacts from illegal cultivation.

    “California has the largest safe, legal, and regulated cannabis market in the world, but unfortunately illegal and unlicensed grows continue to proliferate,” said Attorney General Rob Bonta. “The EPIC program was forged out of our recognition of the need for a more comprehensive approach that addresses the broader implications of the underground cannabis market. This includes tackling the environmental damage caused by these illicit activities, as well as the economic ramifications that arise from unregulated cultivation. Furthermore, there is a growing concern about labor exploitation within this underground market, where workers may face unsafe conditions and unfair treatment. I want to express my gratitude to the various partners involved in this effort, including local, state, and federal law enforcement agencies. Together, we are working toward a solution that not only curtails illegal activities but also promotes a sustainable and equitable cannabis industry in the state.”

    “California has the largest state park system in the country with 1.59 million acres of park land to protect,” said California State Parks Law Enforcement Assistant Chief Jeremy Stinson. “Unfortunately, illegal cannabis cultivation is a serious threat to that land with more than 400 sites documented. California State Parks appreciates being a partner agency within EPIC to help address this issue. Protecting our state’s natural resources for all Californians and future generations is an important part of our mission. We look forward to continuing this valuable partnership to preserve and protect California’s state parks system.” 

    “California cannabis enforcement has a long way to go to ensure that the illicit cannabis doesn’t make it into the legal market,” said San Bernardino County Sheriff Shannon Dicus. “Partnerships like EPIC are a major step forward in tackling this problem.”

    Over the course of the 2024 season, EPIC teams operating in Northern, Central, and Southern California, conducted 665 operations, recovered 201 weapons, and removed infrastructure, including dams, water lines, and containers of toxic chemicals, such as carbofuran, methyl parathion, aluminum phosphate, zinc phosphide, and illegal fertilizers. Carbofuran, in particular, poses untold risks to public health. A lethal insecticide that is effectively banned in the United States, carbofuran remains on plants after application and seeps into soil and nearby water sources. 

    In 2024, EPIC operations were conducted in the following 36 counties:

    • Alameda: 1 site, 751 plants eradicated
    • Butte: 5 sites, 4,397 plants eradicated
    • Colusa: 3 sites, 10 plants eradicated
    • Contra Costa: 2 sites, 5,010 plants eradicated
    • El Dorado: 8 sites, 2,174 plants eradicated
    • Fresno: 31 sites, 52,796 plants eradicated
    • Glenn: 1 site, 747 plants eradicated
    • Kern: 60 sites, 89,819 plants eradicated
    • Kings: 1 site, 539 plants eradicated
    • Lake: 48 sites, 42,776 plants eradicated
    • Lassen: 1 site, 7,359 plants eradicated
    • Los Angeles: 3 sites, 3,684 plants eradicated
    • Madera: 3 sites, 1,230 plants eradicated
    • Mariposa: 2 sites, 1,368 plants eradicated
    • Mendocino: 116 sites, 133,702 plants eradicated
    • Nevada: 33 sites, 28,428 plants eradicated
    • Riverside: 79 sites, 136,601 plants eradicated
    • Sacramento: 13 sites, 46,042 plants eradicated
    • San Bernardino: 23 sites, 27,845 plants eradicated
    • San Diego: 7 sites, 9,301 plants eradicated
    • Santa Barbara: 1 site, 362 plants eradicated
    • Santa Clara: 2 sites, 1,012 plants eradicated
    • Shasta: 67 sites, 51,289 plants eradicated
    • Siskiyou: 98 sites, 67,943 plants eradicated
    • Stanislaus: 6 sites, 5,103 plants eradicated
    • Trinity: 38 sites, 32,381 plants eradicated
    • Tulare: 7 sites, 5,468 plants eradicated
    • Tuolumne: 2 sites, 7,637 plants eradicated
    • Ventura: 3 sites, 7,891 plants eradicated
    • Yuba: 2 sites, 1,164 plants eradicated
    • Monterey: reconnaissance only
    • Napa: reconnaissance only
    • San Benito: reconnaissance only
    • San Luis Obispo: reconnaissance only
    • Santa Cruz: reconnaissance only
    • Solano: reconnaissance only

    The EPIC program focuses on the investigation and prosecution of civil and criminal cases relating to illicit cannabis cultivation with a focus on environmental and economic harms and labor exploitation. EPIC is a multi-agency collaboration led by DOJ in partnership with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s U.S. Forest Service; the U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management and National Park Service; the California Department of Fish and Wildlife; the U.S. Department of Justice’s Drug Enforcement Administration; the California National Guard, Counter Drug Task Force; the Central Valley High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas program; California State Parks; California Environmental Protection Agency; and other local law enforcement departments.

    EPIC marks an evolution in DOJ’s cannabis enforcement work, reflecting the issues and concerns arising from operations each summer. EPIC works in close coordination with DOJ’s Cannabis Control Section, Special Prosecutions Section, and Tax Recovery and Underground Economy (TRUE) Task Force to build investigations and prosecute civil and criminal cases.

    B-roll of the operations produced by DOJ are available for use by producers and members of the media. Please contact agpressoffice@doj.ca.gov. 

    Graphics of 2024 EPIC season statistics are available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: ‘Nobody Wants This’ amps laughs about intermarriage in Judaism but intended humour hurts

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Celia E. Rothenberg, Associate Professor, Department of Religious Studies, McMaster University

    Kristen Bell and Adam Brody star in ‘Nobody Wants This.’ (Netflix)

    Netflix’s new rom-com Nobody Wants This debuted with great success: it occupied the No. 1 spot on Netflix’s Top 10 list for two weeks. It has been praised by a range of critics for its humour, “millennial magic” and pitch-perfect casting.

    Nobody Wants This presents viewers with a mix of classic stereotypes of both Jewish women and men, and the contemporary issue of intermarriage — marriage of two partners who are members of different religions — in Jewish communities.

    It revolves around a young, ambitious rabbi, Noah (Adam Brody), who falls in love with a non-Jewish woman, Joanne (Kristen Bell).

    Joanne and her sister Morgan (Justine Lupe) produce a podcast that features frank, spontaneous talk about sex and relationships, a discursive foil for Rabbi Noah’s carefully composed and tame sermons.

    The show is loosely inspired by creator Erin Foster’s own life as an agnostic woman who fell in love with her husband, Simon Tikhman, a Jewish man. Tikhman, although not a rabbi, wanted to marry a Jewish woman, leading Foster to convert to Judaism. Her conversion and involvement in her Jewish family led to the creation of Nobody Wants This.

    Foster has said she wanted to shed positive light on Jewish culture and her experiences of being brought into it.

    From my perspective as a scholar who has examined aspects of Jewish life and practice in North America, the problem is that Foster’s good intentions fall flat at best, and at worst, could hurt the very people Foster has joined.

    The character Joanne and her sister Morgan produce a podcast which features frank, spontaneous talk about sex and relationships.
    (Netflix)

    Stereotypes of women

    Quickly following the accolades, criticism of the show has particularly focused on its problematic stereotypes of Jewish women. Jessica Radloff wrote in Glamour that after watching two episodes she called her mom and said (speaking of Jewish women), “we come off as controlling, marriage-hungry women who want to plan dinner parties and alienate anyone who doesn’t share those same dreams.” Jessica Grose in the New York Times argues that nearly all the Jewish women in Nobody Wants This are “manipulative, spoiled and selfish.”

    Nobody Wants This reflects long-standing and popular Jewish stereotypes consistently featured in American films – the meddling matriarch, pampered princess and neurotic nebbish – stereotypes that have proven to be widely appealing and thus quite profitable.

    Rabbi Noah’s mother, Bina, is not only the meddling matriarch extreme version, but also a hypocrite who refuses to accept Joanne’s hostess gift when they first meet — a lovely charcuterie tray — because it contains pork (prosciutto). Joanne later discovers Bina secretly stuffing the prosciutto into her mouth.

    Noah’s ex-girlfriend, sister-in-law and their friends seem the epitome of pampered princesses, or JAPs (Jewish American Princesses) — one-dimensional characters who exclude Joanne from their social circle, often appearing overly concerned with jewelry or solely focused on husbands, children and social lives.

    The rabbi

    Foster has said the character of a weed-smoking Rabbi Noah defies stereotypes of a rabbi, yet he can equally be seen to echo the neurotic nebbish, an American Jewish man who is “emasculated, insecure, passive, … romantically obsessed with Gentile women.”

    While Rabbi Noah might be called “hot rabbi” at his Jewish summer camp by teen girls, he works to appease his mother’s demands, he can’t (really) play basketball and he won’t commit to his long-term Jewish girlfriend (who eventually finds his hidden engagement ring and gives it to herself).

    Foster has said these characters are “not, in my opinion, Jewish stereotypes. They’re comedic points of view,” and has also pointed to the show’s sensitive female characters, such as a female rabbi who welcomes Joanne. Present in the writer’s room, Foster noted, were Jewish women, including converts, as well as men with a variety of Jewish backgrounds.

    Rabbi Steve Leder, former senior rabbi of Wilshire Boulevard Temple in Los Angeles was also a consultant on the show.

    Trailer for ‘Nobody Wants This.’

    Perhaps there is some room for comedy here, but the timing is less than ideal. Antisemitism is at a new level of ferocity in the United States and around the world.

    Stereotypes, however potentially humorous, can create, affirm or increase prejudice and distorted understandings of Jews and Jewish life.

    Religious intermarriage

    And what of intermarriage, the seemingly most pressing issue standing between Rabbi Noah and Joanne?

    Is intermarriage so unimaginable, impractical and undesirable for rabbis and their congregants to navigate? There are rabbis who work within liberal streams of Judaism who are not only not opposed to intermarriage, but also in intermarriages themselves.

    Rabbi Gershon Winkler, a formerly Orthodox rabbi who left Orthodoxy and now identifies as independent, points to Jewish precedent for such marriages: the Biblical and Talmudic figures of Moses, Eliezer the High Priest, Joshua, Boaz and Rabbi Akiva who were all married to non-Jews.

    Intermarried rabbis exist within Humanist, Reform (Rabbi Noah’s most likely affiliation), Jewish Renewal and Reconstructionist Jewish movements, although not within Conservative and Orthodox streams.

    Statistics about intermarriage in the U.S. demonstrate quite a varied portrait of Jewish life: overall, 42 per cent of American Jewish adults have a non-Jewish spouse; among those who married after 2010, intermarriage rates reach 61 per cent. Of non-Orthodox Jews, 72 per cent are intermarried, while 98 per cent of Orthodox Jews report their spouse is Jewish.

    In real life, harmful stereotypes of Jews persist, while intermarriage in Jewish communities, lived by many couples and families in the U.S. and beyond, is a nuanced and rich reality reflecting many factors.

    Nobody Wants This makes for a successful and profitable rom-com that hurts some while others laugh.

    Celia E. Rothenberg does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. ‘Nobody Wants This’ amps laughs about intermarriage in Judaism but intended humour hurts – https://theconversation.com/nobody-wants-this-amps-laughs-about-intermarriage-in-judaism-but-intended-humour-hurts-241070

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: What are you really eating? 1 in 5 seafood products in our study were mislabelled

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Matthew R. J. Morris, Associate Professor of Biology, Ambrose University

    If you eat seafood, you could be unknowingly consuming an endangered species without realizing it due to fish mislabelling. Mislabelling is a worldwide issue, and it occurs when the species of fish you think you’re buying is not the one you actually receive.

    Tracing fish from capture to table is logistically complex, as fish products often pass through multiple countries. Along the way, products can be misidentified as another species or intentionally renamed to make more profit.

    For instance, a cheap fish like tilapia may be given the name of a more expensive fish, like red snapper, or an endangered species might be passed off as a better-faring alternative.

    Seafood mislabelling not only threatens vulnerable marine populations, but makes it harder for people to make informed, ethical choices about the food they eat.

    Searching for mislabelling in Calgary

    To investigate this issue in Canada, our recent research paper examined mislabelling and ambiguous market names in invertebrate and finfish products — fish with fins, like cod, salmon and tuna — in Calgary between 2014 and 2020. This was the first study of its kind in Canada to compare shellfish to finfish.

    University students sampled 347 finfish product and 109 shellfish — including shrimp, octopus and oysters — from Calgary restaurants and grocery stores. These samples were then genetically tested using a species-specific marker called a DNA barcode.

    In Canada, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency maintains a Fish List that provides the acceptable common names for the labelling of fish in Canada.

    A seafood product was considered mislabelled if it was sold using a name not found on the Fish List for the DNA-identified species. For instance, there is only one species that can be sold under the name salmon: Atlantic salmon. If sockeye salmon was sold as salmon without any other qualifier, it was considered mislabelled.

    Seafood mislabelling not only threatens vulnerable marine populations, but makes it harder for people to make informed, ethical choices about the food they eat.
    (Shutterstock)

    1 in 5 seafood products were mislabelled

    We discovered that mislabelling is running rampant in Calgary, and that certain product names are more likely to hide species of conservation concern. The result: one in five finfish, and one in five shellfish, were not as advertised. These results fell within the predicted global rates of seafood mislabelling.

    It was not difficult for students to stumble upon examples of mislabelling. Notable findings include:

    • 100 per cent of snapper and red snapper products were mislabelled. They were either tilapia (79 per cent) or a species of rockfish or snapper that cannot be sold under those names (21 per cent).
    • Nine salmon products were determined to be rainbow trout, which are cheaper.
    • Three Pacific cod were determined to be Atlantic cod, which are listed as vulnerable by the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
    • Two eel products were determined to be the critically endangered European eel.
    • Cuttlefish, squid and octopus were often mislabelled as one another.

    Some products, however, fared better than others. All Atlantic salmon, basa, halibut, mackerel, sockeye salmon and Pacific white shrimp were as advertised.

    Mislabelling hurts

    Calgary’s mislabelled seafoods has far-reaching and well-documented implications for public health, conservation and the economy.

    For instance, one student purchased “white tuna” at an all-you-can-eat sushi buffet that turned out to be escolar. Escolar is sometimes called the “laxative of the sea” for the effects its fatty acids can have on digestion. People have landed in the hospital because of this fish.

    Several examples of mislabelling involved substituting an expensive product for a cheaper species: tilapia for snapper, rainbow trout for Atlantic salmon. While companies in places like Miami and Mississippi have faced fines for such fraudulent practices, the global nature of fisheries makes legal action difficult.




    Read more:
    Confusion at the fish counter: How to eat fish responsibly


    European eel are critically endangered, yet students found this species twice in the Calgary market. There is a global black market for European eel and a Canadian company was fined in 2021 for illegally importing them.

    Although red snapper is faring poorly in the wild, replacing it with tilapia is not helping snapper conservation. Instead it provides an illusion of snapper abundance.

    The situation is even murkier when it comes to invertebrates like shrimp, squid and octopus. Unfortunately, so little is known about their conservation status that we couldn’t assess their risks.

    The study found that 100 per cent of snapper and red snapper products were mislabelled.
    (Shutterstock)

    What you can do

    If you eat seafood, there is a chance you could be misled as a consumer and end up eating threatened species. You can reduce these possibilities by doing the following:

    1. Purchase whole, head-on finfish whenever possible, as they are harder to mislabel.

    2. Purchase seafood products that are certified sustainable, as these have been shown to have lower rates of mislabelling.

    3. Purchase products that clearly name the exact species being purchased.

    4. Write to your MPs in support for laws seeking to trace fish from boat to table — Canada has improved its regulations, but it can do better.

    This will require that you brush up on your fish identification skills, but it’s a small price to pay for protecting our fish, saving on groceries and limiting unexpected and urgent trips to the restroom.

    Ambiguous names hide protected species

    To help vendors, the Fish List permits the use of ambiguous names, meaning the same name can be applied to multiple species. Snapper could refer to 96 different species, tuna to 14, cod to two. This helps vendors when related species are difficult to tell apart and is expected to reduce mislabelling.

    We noticed that seafood products with ambiguous names were just as likely to be mislabelled as those with precise names. We wondered: which is worse for conservation, mislabelling or ambiguous names? After all, tuna could legally include yellowfin tuna (least concern) or southern bluefin tuna (endangered).

    A statistical test found that ambiguous names were more important than mislabelling in hiding threatened species. This is a good thing, because it suggests there is a way consumers can help.

    Just as you wouldn’t go to a restaurant and order a “mammal sandwich,” why settle for “fish and chips?” If we as consumers can vote with our wallets by buying Pacific cod instead of cod, or yellowfin tuna instead of tuna, we can be more confident that we aren’t eating the ocean’s equivalent of the giant panda.

    Matthew R. J. Morris received funding from Internationalization at Home in Science Education (i@Home) for this research.

    ref. What are you really eating? 1 in 5 seafood products in our study were mislabelled – https://theconversation.com/what-are-you-really-eating-1-in-5-seafood-products-in-our-study-were-mislabelled-240891

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial News: Interview with Philip Gabunia for Interfax

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Central Bank of Russia –

    There should be no tolerance for someone in the market having access to information before others.

    The problem of insider trading and manipulation on the Russian market is not only not losing its relevance, but on the contrary, is even getting worse against the backdrop of the players becoming more active and anti-sanction relaxations in terms of information disclosure. Deputy Chairman of the Bank of Russia Filipp Gabunia spoke to Interfax about the steps the regulator has planned to counteract these and other negative practices, as well as proposals to increase the capitalization of the Russian stock market, discussions between the exchange and professional participants, and closing “loopholes” for unfriendly non-residents.

    — The Russian stock market has lost a lot in recent years and has changed significantly in general. In these conditions, the task of doubling its capitalization in relation to GDP sounded quite unexpected. Is it already clear what needs to be done in the current reality to solve this problem? Is it really possible in principle?

    — The task is certainly very ambitious. If we talk about what needs to be done, then, of course, there is no universal remedy. A set of actions is needed. Some measures have already been implemented, and we are waiting for their effect. For example, this is the reform of the IIS, the launch of a long-term savings program.

    Now we are also suggesting that the government consider changing the incentive system for companies that receive state support when implementing various projects. Today, loans as a form of raising funds dominate our economy as a whole. This is the bridge that brings together the lender and the borrower. The state usually directs funds to subsidize interest rates, there are benefits for investment projects, but they are all tied to raising funds in the form of loans.

    One measure we have proposed for discussion is subsidized equity financing, i.e. a spread-out payment to companies entering the capital market, as an alternative to subsidies under bank lending programs. In addition, tax incentives, such as income tax breaks for issuers, may also be justified if certain conditions are met.

    — Won’t companies find themselves in unequal conditions? If someone’s strategy doesn’t include publicity at all…

    — No, this does not mean that all support will be transferred exclusively in the form of equity capital. We expect that companies will have a choice — if a project is eligible for state support, it can be received either through preferential lending or in the form of benefits when entering the stock market. Companies themselves will make decisions based on the specifics of the project’s economy and the cost of various sources of financing. At the same time, it is important that state support is not an incentive for only one form of raising money.

    By the way, the use of equity financing will help reduce the debt burden of businesses and will not lead to an additional burden on the budget. There will simply be a redistribution of expenses between forms of support. Here, of course, the position of the government, which, in fact, provides this support, is important.

    — What else is on the “doubling agenda”?

    — The cornerstone, of course, is trust in the stock market, including the attitude towards minority shareholders. If the interests of investors are trampled, they will not come to the market, no matter what incentives we offer. And here it is important that the interests of minority shareholders are not neglected, but on the contrary, protected. This affects, among other things, issues of maximum possible disclosure of information about issuers in the current conditions, availability of price information, increasing the transparency of dividend policy, the quality of corporate culture and much more.

    — This taboo has become less unquestionable in the last couple of years. Some relaxations have already been lifted, but it is hardly possible to say that we have returned to the level that was, say, in 2021. Do you think that all the necessary conditions are now in place to raise the issue of a complete return of all rules, both in terms of disclosure and in terms of corporate governance, to the previous level?

    — Currently, companies have reasons to close some information about themselves, taking into account the sanctions risks. But the fact is that many companies use external circumstances to justify their “secrecy”. Our position is that investors need information to make informed decisions. We will need to come up with some more subtle mechanisms for investors to obtain information about companies.

    — And what can the expansion of trading hours on the stock market give in terms of doubling capitalization? The return of the morning session, trading on weekends?

    — Weekend trading is definitely not the main recipe. But we analyze this topic comprehensively. It sounds convincing and beautiful: if stores work around the clock, why not apply this principle to the stock market? But there are still some specifics here. It is connected primarily with changes in liquidity in different time periods: very early or very late. We used to record quite significant volatility in the morning hours. And this can have serious consequences for investors, if, for example, someone had a margin position. Suddenly they will take and close, although there were no fundamental reasons for this.

    Now we are trying to assess these risks and think about how to mitigate them so as not to create threats to investors. We conducted a survey among investors, asking whether they need trading on weekends. Well, the lion’s share of respondents were against it.

    At the same time, the idea of expanding trading hours is not the worst: our country is large, with different time zones. Therefore, there are indeed arguments in favor of such a decision.

    We have received proposals from both Moscow Exchange and St. Petersburg Exchange on how they see trading on weekends. It is important to make a balanced decision now.

    — The role of the domestic investor has grown significantly now, but it is unlikely that the market can be doubled solely by relying on one’s own efforts. But if you put yourself in the shoes of a foreign investor, even from a currently friendly jurisdiction: he should probably also be concerned about the “risks of foreign infrastructure” in relation to Russia, which the Central Bank has so often spoken about in relation to foreign markets. Perhaps there are some steps that can be taken, so to speak, to accommodate foreign investors? Some restrictions can be softened, removed, to show that the risks of foreign infrastructure in Russia are no greater than the risks of a Russian investor in a foreign jurisdiction?

    — It is clear that we cannot guess what concerns a foreign investor who wants to come to our market has. My opinion is that today we have no restrictions in relation to friendly jurisdictions. We have not taken a single unfriendly step, all our measures were a response to the actions of foreign institutions. Moreover, we are systematically moving towards easing regulations, for example, we have direct access for their brokers to currency trading on our exchange. In the future, we will develop depository bridges to synchronize asset accounting.

    We are not closing our market and are ready for constructive cooperation.

    — The head of the Bank of Russia said in May that we need to think about establishing a minimum free float level for admission to trading. Have you discussed this with the market?

    — Moreover, we have a regulatory act at the output. We propose to increase the minimum share of shares in free circulation for the second level of listing — to 5%. We analyzed the volume of securities issued by issuers that are actually available for exchange transactions. In general, our estimates coincided with the exchange’s estimates. It is planned that the new requirements will come into force on April 1, 2025.

    Requirements for first-tier issuers remain in place. To be included in the first quotation list, a company must direct 10% of the issue into free circulation. Then maintain a free float of 7.5%.

    With regard to securities that are not included in the quotation lists (and this echelon is precisely where securities that have historically had a low free float are concentrated), measures to counter volatility are taken by the organizers of trades based on their own methods, taking into account the recommendations of the Bank of Russia.

    — Recently, the topic of the risk of large companies leaving the stock exchange has been raised in the public arena. Does the regulator see such risks? Are you planning to do anything?

    — For now, it seems to us that this is somewhat exaggerated. We do not see any prerequisites for delisting the largest issuers of securities. At the same time, the current regulation allows the exchange to make a decision in certain situations to lower the level of the quotation list and even delist. But in each case, it is necessary to assess the consequences of such a decision for retail and institutional investors.

    — You have already outlined the problem of stock acceleration, especially low-liquidity stocks. How are things now? Are any additional steps needed?

    — Indeed, it was a serious problem. In just 3 quarters of last year, the number of shares subject to destabilization reached 63. For comparison, about 12 such cases were recorded for the whole of 2022. At the same time, price fluctuations could exceed 50%. And the most interesting thing is that this was not even direct manipulation in the legal sense of the word, but you know, a kind of lottery – who will jump first. The purpose of such actions is the artificial and planned formation of a trend on the paper. And when the market is already entering the expected state or is approaching it, the manipulator exits the position, as a rule, in advance.

    But the stock exchange is not gambling. Organized trading should determine adequate and transparent pricing. We, together with the Moscow Exchange, have taken measures to limit aggressive bids in the third tier. Because such swings, as I have already said, can only be arranged when the market is thin and the free float is low. New (rigid) price limits were set, the price step for the most volatile securities was increased, the possibility of submitting aggressive bids beyond a 5% deviation from the best price was limited, and the response time of the discrete auction was reduced.

    In fact, this has yielded results, the number of such practices has decreased many times – to isolated cases, and this trend has remained to this day. We do not see any more bright bursts of volatility. In general, the measures have worked, so we do not see any point in making any additional decisions yet.

    — Do you follow the price fluctuations of securities, including those of large issuers, at the St. Petersburg Exchange?

    – Of course, right now we are discussing that they introduce the necessary levels of control to avoid volatility.

    — There was an idea to increase fines for manipulation, what stage is it at now?

    — We are currently discussing with law enforcement agencies the possibility of toughening the punishment. In our opinion, it should be proportional to the scale of the damage caused. Today, the minimum fine for individuals is often insignificant compared to the “earnings” received — 3,000 rubles. Articles of the Criminal Code begin to be applied when damage is caused in the amount of 3.75 million rubles. That is, the fines are small, but criminal liability occurs very quickly. We believe that it is necessary, first of all, to toughen administrative punishment.

    In particular, we propose to provide for a fine that is a multiple of the amount of illegally obtained income in the process of manipulation – from 3 to 5 times. At the same time, we advocate increasing the minimum fine – up to 10 thousand for individuals, up to 100 thousand for officials and up to 1 million rubles for companies.

    In addition, we believe it is necessary to increase the limitation period for bringing to administrative responsibility, as well as to introduce the concept of a lower threshold of turnover for transactions, up to which administrative punishment is not applied. Now we must bring to responsibility for any identified fact. However, according to our estimates, transactions of up to 1 million rubles are not capable of significantly affecting fair pricing on the market. And such violations do not need to be brought to “administrative” responsibility; it is quite sufficient for the broker to warn his client that this should not be done. The introduction of such a threshold will allow us to focus our attention on more serious cases that cause more significant harm to the interests of investors on the exchange.

    As for criminal liability, in our opinion, it is necessary to increase the minimum threshold of damage for its occurrence. But at the same time, provide for confiscation of property as an additional measure of influence. At the same time, we believe that it is possible to exempt from criminal liability those who committed a crime for the first time and compensated for the damage.

    It must be said that we want to transfer many procedures for minor violations to the broker’s side.

    We have already greatly simplified the operational procedures for exchanging information with the exchange and professional participants when they inform us of any abnormal things. Traditionally, the model for combating insider trading and manipulation was, as we say, “central bank-centric”, that is, the Bank of Russia was the main link in collecting information from exchanges, issuers, and professional participants. We considered complaints and appeals from financial market participants, qualified violations, punished, and so on. Now we have managed to simplify interaction with other market participants and standardize our actions.

    We assume that each participant in the system – trade organizers, brokers, issuers – can share this responsibility.

    — You recently published information about a deal between an individual and a regulator. What was the agreement?

    — This is the first case since such a rule has been in force in the law. For ethical reasons, we do not disclose information about the person who has agreed to an agreement with us. But how does this work in principle?

    The essence of the deal is that the culprit repents of his actions and agrees to assist in the investigation of the manipulation case. In return, the charges against him are dropped, he retains his business reputation and can continue to work in the financial market.

    It should be noted that this is not possible in all cases. The Bank of Russia, before entering into a deal, must take into account the severity of the committed act, its social danger.

    Then we assess how the conditions that the person who has embarked on the path of correction is willing to accept in order to remove the charges against themselves are proportionate to the damage caused. This may be an agreement to undergo additional training on the topic of counteracting insider trading and manipulation, restrictions on trading with certain instruments or for a certain period of time. Providing information about other facts of manipulation may also be a condition of the deal.

    The agreement is considered fulfilled if the individual has documented compliance with the terms within 6 months. Otherwise, the procedure for bringing him to administrative responsibility will continue.

    — Has the insider problem gotten worse?

    — Yes, this problem has become more acute than before. Firstly, because the market has become more active, more players have appeared on it, and secondly, issuers have the right not to disclose some information. And here information asymmetry appears, when a limited group of people gets access to information that will never become public. And they can use this information to make a profit on the stock market. We must not allow tolerance to develop for the fact that someone has access to information earlier than others.

    We distinguish two types of insider information: trading, when an investor has learned information directly about the nature of planned trading operations on the stock exchange. And corporate, when an insider makes illegal transactions based on information from the issuer, such as the size of dividends.

    Both of these need to be addressed. We have analyzed a number of cases and have come to the following conclusion. It is necessary to introduce prohibitive periods when insiders are prohibited from making transactions with securities, and it is also necessary to expand the list of insider positions and require issuers to work with them more.

    Issuers need to gradually but actively form a culture: train insider employees, conduct checks on the facts of publication of insider information, including in messengers, before its official disclosure.

    Everyone should understand that insider trading is not allowed and will not go unpunished. We have now begun to actively conduct checks on the largest issuers for compliance with the legislation on combating insider trading. This is, of course, a more complex story in terms of proof.

    Therefore, we hope for a certain synergy due to the fact that the interests of the regulator, issuers, and professional market participants coincide here. Many companies are already turning to us for help, asking us to explain how to work with inside information.

    — There were plans to launch an insider index. How is this work progressing? How much will it help?

    — Yes, we worked with the Moscow Exchange on the possibility of introducing an aggregated indicator for transactions made by insiders. Obviously, without specifying the personalities and details of the transactions. The exchange is currently preparing a methodology for calculating the index. In our opinion, the introduction of such a tool will certainly provide additional transparency to the market. But unfortunately, I am not sure that this will be a panacea.

    — Does everything you listed eliminate the need to think about some kind of regulation of the “Telegram” environment? If conditions are created that prevent manipulation, including from Telegram channels, let them do what they think is necessary, or is some kind of approach to them still necessary?

    — Any source of information, from an insider point of view, is an object of attention for us, Telegram in this sense is just one of them. Recently, more attention has been paid to it, and we monitor this environment in the same way as other sources of information. Another issue is that Telegram channels and financial bloggers are really turning into an independent way of promoting products, in fact, they are engaged in hidden advertising. We see that bloggers often advise their subscribers to buy this or that financial product or use the services of a certain company. And people do not know whether this advice is the blogger’s personal opinion or “custom” information.

    We have a letter ready for professional participants who attract bloggers (financial influencers) to promote their services, where we recommend that they disclose information about such advertising on their websites and mobile applications. Also, the performer, that is, the blogger, in turn, must mark the material – indicate who is its customer. It is important for us that the information is presented correctly and does not create false investment expectations.

    — In July, NAUFOR proposed discussing the rejection of the central depository institution as a counter-sanction measure. What does the Central Bank think about this? Is there any life in this idea?

    — I consider this idea to be extremely harmful. Its authors argue that abandoning the central depository will protect against sanctions. But as practice shows, it is impossible to predict where the restrictions will come from next time. From our point of view, this infrastructure solution has proven its usefulness. Centralization of accounting ensured a “single chain” of interaction between registrars and depositories and simplified the payment of dividends from public companies.

    Now the issuer transfers funds to the central depository, which in turn transfers them to its clients – depositories, and thus the funds cascade to the end investor. And with decentralized accounting, the issuer is forced to interact with each nominal holder in the register.

    The centralized model of the accounting system allows market participants to work in uniform formats and minimize their operational risks. The National Settlement Depository has also become the central source of information on securities and corporate actions. And it is this institution that largely helps restore the rights of Russian investors after the introduction of restrictions by unfriendly states.

    In addition, it was precisely due to the centralization of securities accounting that it became possible to develop a technology that would simplify the client’s path when moving from one broker to another.

    To abandon such a system, from my point of view, is in a sense to shoot yourself in the foot.

    — In the spring, a discussion was launched on disintermediation, the Bank of Russia even issued a consultative report on this topic. Now the idea of a world without brokers, that is, with one super-broker in the form of the Moscow Exchange, is it closed or not yet? On the other hand, will the Central Bank think in the direction of limiting internalization, so as not to deprive the exchanges of part of their business? Where is the balance here?

    — We are close to completing this discussion. We are inclined to believe that disintermediation in the form in which it may now take shape will cause quite serious damage to the market as a whole, leading to its certain fragmentation. And ultimately, the processes that connect investors and issuers, on the contrary, will be complicated, will become more expensive and less accessible. Therefore, at the moment, we are inclined to believe that we should not go this way.

    At the same time, we have once again carefully assessed the practice of internalization and see that there are a number of significant negative factors here too. As a rule, the investor does not understand that he is making a deal not at an organized trade. And this affects the status of the deal itself, which may not be in favor of the broker in the event of litigation. The investor, at a minimum, should be informed that he is making an over-the-counter transaction and have the opportunity to choose where he wants to make it in order to avoid unnecessary risks.

    The second is the volume of transactions. In the practices that we see, the rule of best execution is observed, the price, albeit very slightly, is better than the quotes on the exchange. But then the question arises, where is the correct price. Because if the volume of transactions taking place within the broker is several times greater than that by which the price is formed, it can be very conditionally said that the price that was formed on the exchange is really adequate. Therefore, the volume of transactions within brokers should be limited. We are currently thinking through the parameters.

    — Another question for the doubling of our stock market. Now the rates are high, and the stock market, probably, is not so easy to withstand the competition for money. This year, what dynamics do you see with dividend payments that come to investors — are they reinvested for the most part or are they still withdrawn from the market and go to the banking system?

    — RUB 3.2 trillion in dividends have already been paid. We have not recorded a significant flow into the banking sector. In retail, we see that this money was overwhelmingly reinvested, just not always in shares. According to the Bank of Russia, part of the funds were directed by investors into stock market instruments: as a rule, these are money market funds, which is associated with higher expected returns against the backdrop of tightening monetary policy and low market risks. In addition, according to our estimates, no more than 10% of private investors’ funds in the second quarter of 2024 “flowed” from shares to OFZs, corporate bonds and mutual funds. The sources of net purchases of bonds and mutual funds by private investors were mainly “new” money – potentially, this could be “flows” from deposits and current accounts of individuals, as well as reinvestment of funds received from the redemption of bonds and dividend payments.

    — Is the launch of new instruments for retail investors being discussed — linked to cryptocurrencies, some kind of settlement futures?

    — No, our attitude towards cryptocurrency has not changed from an investment point of view.

    — We have not had exchange trading in dollars and euros for more than four months. For other jurisdictions, this is generally a familiar picture, but for us, it is new. Over the past time, have you seen any risks of non-market nature of exchange rate formation? Can we say that from the point of view of transparency of this process, its quality, the market has not lost anything, or does something still need to be fine-tuned?

    — Just so that everyone understands how the dollar and euro rates are set after the end of exchange trading, we have published the methodology for calculating these rates on our website. That is, we have made this process transparent, and it is absolutely not arbitrary. We use an approach similar to that used when calculating rates based on exchange trading, that is, we determine the average weighted rate by volume.

    In order to bring the calculation conditions closer to the stock market and exclude various anomalies, we have incorporated algorithms for cutting off atypical values into the methodology. We take the data for the calculation from bank statements.

    The ability to set a rate at will that differs from the conditions prevailing on the over-the-counter market is excluded.

    — This year, the threshold for mandatory sale of foreign currency earnings by exporters was lowered twice, and for a short period of time. Is it possible to move further in this direction or has the minimum required for financial stability already been reached?

    — We support the decisions taken to lower the threshold and increase the terms for crediting revenue. This facilitates cross-border payments and reduces the burden on exporters. We will continue to observe. But we do not make such decisions. This is the government’s competence.

    — How do you see the development of the digital financial assets market? In what prospects is the emergence of a secondary market possible, and is it needed at all?

    — DFA is a young instrument. It was formed in a certain arbitration environment — in DFA it was possible to do things that were not possible in classical instruments, and vice versa, DFA has some of its own limitations. Now we are talking about how we can evaluate the results of such a spontaneous experiment in terms of arbitrations, and perhaps soften something in the classical market, perhaps tighten it in the digital asset market. For now, we are discussing the problems and looking towards eliminating the current unequal conditions.

    As for the development prospects. In my understanding, it is not so much the “a la glass” treatment itself with some gigantic trading volumes that is important, but the fact that today we have each platform locked in itself, and investors have no opportunity to go beyond it. Therefore, we need to look for a solution to make these transitions possible. What it will be in the end, I cannot say yet, but by the end of the year we plan to decide on the concept.

    One of the options for the development of the secondary market could be digital certificates, which will allow the organization of the circulation of digital financial assets on the stock exchange.

    — Recently, a presidential decree was issued on the accounting of shares on type “C” accounts and a decision of the board of directors of the Central Bank in its development. Why was this necessary?

    — We are introducing additional protection of the market from attempts to circumvent anti-sanction regulation. I am talking about practices when citizens or companies buy Russian assets from “enemies” very cheaply abroad, and then sell them here at auctions. In simple terms, they create an overhang. So, the decree makes it possible to separate this overhang from the auctions.

    – But now it’s also impossible to transfer from accounts “C” without permission…

    — Yes, there is a regime for separating Russian securities in the accounting chains of which there is a hostile investor. At the same time, conditions were created for bona fide purchasers so that they could exit the assets. But all our concessions were the subject of creative ideas in order to obtain a higher marginality from transactions with Russian assets. Why is this bad? Firstly, this is a certain reduction in the “C-mass”, that is, this is a weakening of the countermeasure. And secondly, this hits honest investors who came, believed in our market, invest something, try to earn.

    Therefore, it was decided that now shares of Russian issuers, including international companies, can be transferred to a trading account from personal account “C” only by decision of the government commission.

    — Was the scale of the problem significant enough to require a presidential decree?

    — No. We responded in a timely manner (to attempts to circumvent restrictions — IF). But this game of “cat and mouse” simply shows that the demand is high, and drastic measures need to be taken to free us from constantly catching someone red-handed. And we need to protect our investors, because they are promised that everything will work out, and then it doesn’t work out, and they end up with losses. Now, from our point of view, a barrier has appeared that cannot be overcome. At least, I have not yet been able to come up with options and schemes. But I will emphasize once again that we have not recorded significant volumes that would somehow “spill” through circumventing restrictions. What we have found are isolated cases or even attempts.

    — Why is this measure being introduced temporarily, only until the end of 2025?

    — During this time, we want to provide additional protection mechanisms. They just require painstaking development.

    — At a recent discussion of the draft of the main directions of development of the financial market, the reform of microfinance organizations was almost the hottest topic. If we listen to representatives of the industry, your proposals will put an end to it. Do you counter?

    — Now the MFI market is a cauldron in which many different things are brewed, but everything that is there is considered a microfinance organization. And it is often said: “Let’s ban all this.” In fact, the market is diverse, it consists of three parts.

    The first are companies that focus on financing small businesses and have nothing to do with the practices that are troubling everyone.

    The second group are companies that provide installment services. Their rates are actually comparable to bank consumer loans. Also a normal product, has a right to exist.

    And the third piece, which worries everyone the most, is “payday loans”. Regulation here has been tightened many times. For example, loans secured by property were banned, so that there would be no stories of people being forced into bondage, or having their apartment taken away. Maximum overpayments and interest rates were systematically reduced. But there are practices that allow one to bypass restrictions on overpayments through hidden refinancing, when a new loan is issued to a client and previously accrued interest is included in its body. A chain of loans is formed, a kind of rolling, the debt grows. There are about a third of such loans on the market.

    We conducted research and found out where people spend the money they borrow “until payday.” There are categories that spend it on betting, sports games – this is a rather alarming story for us. Up to 20% of the amount of loans issued is spent on these purposes. That is, the problem is acquiring a social character.

    We plan to introduce regulations that will stop such rolling. This is the restriction of “one loan per hand until repayment” for the most expensive loans. The second regulation is the introduction of a cooling-off period between repayment of one loan and receipt of another.

    We have completed the discussion of the report, met with the market, State Duma deputies, received more than 100 questions and proposals. Some points are debatable, they may still move. But as far as fundamental things are concerned, we remain on our positions and intend to implement measures to protect borrowers as quickly as possible.

    Interfax

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    http://vvv.kbr.ru/press/event/?id=21108

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Remarks by Vice President Harris and Liz Cheney at a Campaign Event | Royal Oak,  MI

    Source: The White House

    Royal Oak Music Theatre
    Royal Oak, Michigan

    4:31 P.M. EDT

    MS. SHRIVER:  Okay.  Here we go.  Sit back.  We’ve got 40 — 40 minutes, and we’re going to move quick.  Okay?

    So, I want this to be like a kitchen table.  Like, just think that we’re sitting around the kitchen table and we’re jamming about all kinds of stuff.  That’s the feeling I want to have at this —

         MS. CHENEY:  This is like a Kennedy family kitchen table.

         MS. SHRIVER:  It — yeah.  (Laughter.)

         MS. CHENEY:  Most people don’t have this many, you know?

         THE VICE PRESIDENT:  That’s good.  That’s good.

    MS. SHRIVER:  That’s right.  It’s raucous.  It’s — it’s hot, but it’s fun.  That’s what it’s going to be like. 

    So, this is — I was saying before both of you walked out, this is historic — so I hope everybody takes this in for a minute — to have a leader of the Republican Party and the vice president of the United States.  (Applause.) 

    So, let me begin with you, Madam Vice President.  Did you ever think in your wildest dreams that you would be running for president alongside Liz Cheney, who would be advocating for you, campaigning for you — a member of a opposing party putting herself on the line for you?

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  So, let me just start by thanking everyone.  Thank you all for taking time out of your busy lives to be here and have this conversation. 

    And I think we are all here together because we have many things in common.  First and foremost, we love our country.  We love our country.  (Applause.) 

    You know, so, Maria, perhaps not, but — (laughter).

    MS. SHRIVER:  Perhaps.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT: Perhaps not. 

    But let me say this.  So, you mentioned, you know, my background.  So, I started my career as a prosecutor, and most of my career has been spent outside of Washington, D.C., not in Washington, D.C.  And for most of my career, let me just tell you, I never once asked a victim of crime, a witness, “Are you a Democrat, or are you a Republican?”  Never.  It never would have even occurred to me to ask that.  What I did ask everyone: “Are you okay?” 

    And when I think, then, about what is at stake in this election, I think that’s the biggest question.  And it is a moment where, born out of our love of our country, born out of, for me, having taken the oath of office to the Constitution of the United ta- — States at least six times, I believe what is at stake in this election is so fundamental for us as Americans.  And it is about: Do we take seriously the importance of a president who obeys the oath to be loyal to the Constitution of the United States?  Do we prioritize a president of the United States who cares about rule of law, much less the spirit with which they approach this most powerful position? 

    There’s so much about this last era — when I talk about “turn the page,” that’s what I’m referring to, like the last decade — that has been about some powerful forces suggesting that the measure of the strength of a leader is based on who you beat down instead of what I think most of us believe, regardless of your party affiliation, that the real measure of the strength of a leader is based on who you lift up.

    And — (applause) — and so, for that reason, I’m not surprised that Liz Cheney and I are on the same stage 15 days before the election.  (Applause.)  You know?

    MS. SHRIVER:  Okay.  Well, maybe you’re not surprised, but I’m surprised.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  (Laughs.)

    MS. SHRIVER:  And I think a lot of people are surprised.  So, I want to know: Are you surprised?  Are you surprised that you’re out here campaigning for a Democrat, campaigning for Kamala Harris, against the party that you’ve been a part of your entire life?

    MS. CHENEY:  You know, what I would say, first of all, is we all know — everyone who watched January 6th knows, you know, what Donald Trump is willing to do.  He lost the election, he tried to overturn it and seize power, and then he sat in his dining room and he watched the attack on television.  He watched it.  People pleaded with him to tell the mob to leave, and he wouldn’t.  And he watched law enforcement officers be brutally beaten.  He watched it. 

    That’s a depravity that, to me and — and, you know, I think to anyone who’s taken the oath of office, makes someone absolutely unfit ever to be president again.

    Now — (applause) — I — I could have just said, you know, I’m going to do everything I can to work against Donald Trump, and there are a lot of Republicans who have said that.

    MS. SHRIVER:  Yes.

    MS. CHENEY:  I have decided — and I am very proud and I’m honored to have made the decision — to endorse Vice President Harris.  (Applause.) 

    And — and I have gotten to spend time with Vice President Harris.  I have had the chance to talk with her about how important it is that we have two strong parties in our country, about the kind of president that I know she’ll be. 

    And I think all of us — it doesn’t matter what party you’re in — we all know this is a good and an honorable and a great nation, and we have to have leaders — you might say, “I’m not going to agree on every issue” — but we have to have leaders who take that seriously.  We have to have leaders who are going to be sincere. 

    And — and as a mother, I want my children to know that there is someone sitting in the Oval Office that they can look up to, someone who can be a role model.  And I’m incredibly proud and I know that Vice President Harris will be that.  (Applause.)

    MS. SHRIVER:  Right.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  And — and, Maria, let me just add one thing also, because it bears repeating.  I have seen a lot of Republicans go up to Liz Cheney and thank her.  And they may not be doing it publicly — they may not be doing it publicly, because I think she has shown, to your point, extraordinary courage, especially in this environment, post January 6th, where there’s something — an undercurrent that is violent in terms of the language and the tenor. 

    And for her to show the courage she has shown is extraordinary.  But she’s — I’ve seen Republicans come up to her and — and I — from my vantage point, she’s actually not alone.  (Applause.)

    MS. SHRIVER:  And so, I want to talk about that, because there are a lot of people who are scared.  Scared to vote —

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

    MS. SHRIVER:  — for you.  Scared about the environment.  Scared to talk about politics. 

    How scary was it for you, personally, to make this decision?  What has been the personal cost for you to do so?

    MS. CHENEY:  It — it was not — it wasn’t scary at all, in terms of making this decision, because when I look at the — the nature of the threat that Donald Trump poses and — and, look, Donald Trump is doing everything he can to try to get people to forget about what he did — what he did on January 6th. 

    And — and when you think about that level of instability, the level of erratic decision-making, the misogyny, that’s not someone that you can entrust with the power of the Oval Office. 

    And so, I — I think that we are facing a — a choice in this election.  It’s not about party; it’s about right and wrong. 

    And — and I certainly have many Republicans who will say to me, “I can’t be public.”  They do worry about a whole range of things —

    MS. SHRIVER:  Right.

    MS. CHENEY:  — including violence.  But — but they’ll do the right thing. 

    And I would just remind people: If you’re at all concerned, you can vote your conscience and not ever have to say a word to anybody.  (Applause.)  And there will be millions of Republicans who do that on November 5th — vote for Vice President Harris.

    MS. SHRIVER:  Yes.

    I — I love that you said you weren’t scared at all, because most people will talk today about “I’m afraid to say anything on social media.”  “I’m afraid to speak in my place of worship.”  “I’m aprai- — afraid to speak where I work.”  “I’m afraid.” 

    How are you not afraid?

    MS. CHENEY:  Well, I think that — that the point you’re making is a really important one.  Think about what’s happened in our country, the level of vicious, vitriolic attack. 

    You know, when — when Donald Trump says that his political opponents are the enemy within and when he contemplates deploying force against them, the response that we all have should not be to be so afraid we don’t act.  It should be: Vote him out.  Defeat him.  Defeat him.  Vote for Vice President Harris.  (Applause.)

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  And, Maria, I’m going to add to that.

    MS. SHRIVER:  Yeah.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  I — I would add to that an additional point, which is — and don’t think it’s a sick sense of humor and relegate it to simply being that.  You know, I’ve said many times, I do believe Donald Trump to be an unserious man, but the consequences of him ever being in the White House again are brutally serious.

    And — and take it from the people who know him best: his former chief of staff when he was president; two former Defense secretaries; his national security advisor; and, of course, his vice president, who have all in one way or another used the word that he is “unfit” to be president again and is dangerous. 

    Listen to the report that — what his former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a general, said about him: that he is “fascist to the core.” 

    And these are people who were in his administration, who worked closely with him in the Oval Office and the Situation Room. 

    And so, I would caution us also — you know, because some people find it humorous what he says and — and think it’s just silly.  But understand how brutally serious it is.

    AUDIENCE MEMBER:  Lock him up!

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Well, the courts will take care of that.  We’ll take care of November, yes.  (Applause.)  (Laughs.)  We’ll take care of November. 

    But it is brutally serious, because to — to the congresswoman’s point, anyone has — who has openly said, as he has, that he would terminate the Constitution of the United States should never again stand behind the seal of the president of the United States — never again.  (Applause.)

    MS. SHRIVER:  So, Madam Vice President, I wanted to ask you — several people that I talked to in preparation for this — when I asked them, they said, “Well, I — I want to vote for the vice president, but I just don’t feel like I know her.  I don’t know enough about her.  I see the ads, but I don’t have a feel for her.”  What are three things you can tell this audience about you that aren’t in your ads, that people aren’t telling people on the robocalls, that perhaps they just wouldn’t know that might give them a feeling for who you are as a woman?

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  How much time do we have?  (Laughter.)

    MS. SHRIVER:  We’re at the kitchen table. 

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  I — I have lived a full life.  (Laughter.)

    I am a wife.  I am a mother.  I am a sister.  I am a godmother.  I love to cook. 

    I started my career as a prosecutor, in large part — there are many reasons but one very fundamental is, when I was young, one of my best friends in high school, I learned, was being molested by her stepfather.  And I told her, when I learned, she had to come live with us.  I talked to my mother about it.  “Of course, she has to come live with us,” and she did.  And I decided I wanted to take on a career and a life that was about protecting the most vulnerable. 

    I served as attorney general of California two terms.  I was the — the top law enforcement officer of the biggest state in the country.  And doing that work, it included prosecuting transnational criminal organizations for the trafficking of guns, drugs, and human beings.  I did the work of taking on the big banks during the foreclosure crisis and delivered $20 billion for homeowners who had been targeted with predatory lending practices.  (Applause.)  I took on the big pharmaceutical companies on behalf of consumers.

    As vice president of the United States, my priorities have been many, including, to your point, the work that you and I have done over the years focusing on women’s health.  One of my priorities is — has been maternal mortality. 

    But I — I have only had one client in my career: the people.  And my belief is that there is great nobility in public service if one understands that they hold the office in the public trust.  It is not about personal power.  It is about what you can do that lifts up the condition of people. 

    And there is so much about how I think about my responsibility, and I am here to ask for your vote — is that I do — I intend to be a president for all Americans, understanding that the vast majority of us have so much more in common than what separates us. 

    And this era that was kind of initiated by Donald Trump has not only been exhausting, it has been harmful to us as a nation.  The notion that a president of the United States would encourage Americans to point fingers at each other, that — that there would be a suggestion that we are a divided country, that — instead of knowing we have so much more in common than what separates us.

    I have, as vice president, met over 150 world leaders: presidents, prime ministers, chancellors, and kings.  My most recent overseas trips as vice president — which were relatively close to, then, the election — our allies have expressed real concern. 

    I’ve shared this before, but, you know, when we walk in a room representing the United States of America, we should walk in that room, especially leaders, chin up, shoulders back, knowing that we have the self-appointed and earned authority to talk about the importance of democracy and rule of law. 

    But the thing about being a role model — it’s all role models who are here — people watch what you do to see if it matches up to what you say.  People around the world are watching this election, I promise you.  And my — one fear I have is I hope and I pray that we, the American people, understand not only what is at stake for us in this election but how much we mean to the rest of the world. 

         There is so much at stake in this election.

         MS. SHRIVER:  Liz Cheney, tell us real quick — I want to get to our first question.  But you’ve been traveling with the vice president.  You’ve been working with her.  You’ve been spending human time with her.  Tell the audience what you see that perhaps, you know, the camera doesn’t get or the ads don’t get so that they can get a sense of her that you have. 

         MS. CHENEY:  Well, I — I think that what I can tell you is that what the vice president is saying about wanting to be a president for all Americans, caring deeply about this country, those are things that — that come across very, very clearly and very directly. 

         And — and, look, I — I’m a conservative.  The very first campaign I ever volunteered in was for President Gerald Ford in 1976, and — and ever since then, I have been voting for Republicans.  I’ve never voted for a Democrat.  And —

         MS. SHRIVER:  Wow.

         MS. CHENEY:  And so, the — the fact that — that I — I believe so strongly that in this election — in this election, we need to elect the person who is the responsible adult — (laughter and applause) — and — and we need —

         And — and there is a lot — both parties do it.  There is a lot of vilification that goes on.

         MS. SHRIVER:  Yeah.

         MS. CHENEY:  And — and I think it’s really important for people to — to think very carefully about the power that we’re going to invest in the president of the United States and what it would mean to — to give that power to Donald Trump. 

         Don’t take my word for who he is.  Listen to him every day.  Look at what he did.  Remember that the people, as the vice president said, who are opposing him are the people who know him best, the people who worked most closely with him. 

         And so, I would just say I — I know that the vice president has had the range of experience, has — as vice president, as senator, as attorney general of California.  She is supremely qualified to be president of the United States.  I think there — there — sometimes there are some men who suggest that she’s not.  But if you look at her qualifications, there’s no question.  And that she’s somebody that I know I can count on who will put the good of this country first, there’s just no question.  (Applause.)

         MS. SHRIVER:  Okay.  I want to go — I want to go over here to Cecelia.  Cecelia Borland, can you stand up?  You have a question.

         Cecelia grew up in Birmingham, Michigan, which was a Republican stronghold as she grew up.  She now lives with her husband.  They’re raising two children in Berkley, Michigan, and she’s here with a question for the vice president.

         Q    Thank you both for coming to Michigan today for this important event.  I’d like to start by saying, personally, thank you, Representative Cheney, for — to you and your father for exemplifying putting country over party.  (Applause.) 

         And, Madam Vice President, I hope you had a wonderful birthday yesterday. 

         THE VICE PRESIDENT:  (Laughter.)  Thank you.  (Applause.)  Thank you.

         Q    From the shootings at Oxford High School to my alma mater, Michigan State University, to an attack at a kid’s splash pad this summer just a few miles away from here, the issue of gun violence hits very close to home for our community. 

         Just yesterday, I learned from our school district that my preschooler will be going through his first active shooter drill.

         THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

         Q    As a gun violence survivor and mother of two young children, the issue of gun violence and the safety of my children in their schools and in our community is my top priority.

         Madam Vice President, if you are elected president and there is a Republican majority in Congress, how will you work with them to make impactful and immediate progress around gun violence, especially in our children’s schools?

         THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Right.  Thank you —

         MS. SHRIVER:  Thank you.

         THE VICE PRESIDENT:  — Cecelia.  And thank you and — for your courage to speak up about this.

         So — well, we have done it, actually, in the last four years.  We had a bipartisan group of — of folks in Congress who came together for the Safer Communities Act, which is the first meaningful piece of gun safety legislation in 30 years.  And so, it’s a good step, and it really does tell us that we have a will within the United States Congress to work in a bipartisan way.  And — and then-Congresswoman Cheney was one of those Republicans that actually voted for it. 

         I — this is how I think of the issue.  And it is through the — the lens of many experiences, including act- — I’m so sorry about your kids going through active shooter drills.  It’s — our kids did.  It’s traumatic that our children — you know, growing up, I’ll speak for myself, we had fire drills.  Right?

         Our children are now learning how to keep themselves safe if there’s an active shooter at their school. 

         I did a tour last year of — of colleges — with college-aged kids, so I also did some trade schools.  And I would ask the room — the auditorium would be packed — college-age kids — and I’d ask them, “Raise your hand if at any point between kindergarten and 12th grade you had to endure an active shooter drill.”  Almost every hand went up. 

         Our kids are growing up where they are learning that they may be unsafe in the classroom where they should be absorbing the wonders of the world. 

         One kid said to me, “Yeah” — we were talking about this — and said to me, “Yeah, that’s why I don’t like going to fifth period.”  I said, “Why, sweetheart?  Why don’t you like going to fifth period?”  “Because in that classroom, there’s no closet,” in which to hide. 

         So, we — when we think of this issue, we must also consider the trauma that is the trauma of — the direct trauma for those who have been directly affected by gun violence, including that to our kids who are in schools across our country doing this — not to mention their teachers, who want to teach and not also have to worry about will they be able to physically protect a child from a bullet.

         Here’s how I think about it in terms of the macro point.  We have been pushing, as a country, I think, a false choice that suggests you’re either in favor of the Second Amendment or you want to take everyone’s guns away.  And that’s a false choice. 

         I’m in favor of the Second Amendment.  I have talked about the fact both Tim Walz and I are gun owners.  I also believe we need reasonable gun safety laws, assault weapons bans, red flag laws, universal background checks.  (Applause.)  And — and reports say that the majority of NRA members agree on, for example, universal background checks. 

         What is a universal background check?  It’s just common sense.  Here’s what it is: You just might want to know before someone can buy a lethal weapon whether they’ve been found by a court to be a danger to themselves or others.  You just might want to know.  It’s common sense.  (Applause.)  We need commonsense gun safety laws. 

         And I will continue — I’ve done it throughout my career — work with all of our colleagues across the aisle.  And I know that we can make progress. 

         But this is not — I’m not trying to take anybody’s guns away from them.  But we need reasonable gun safety laws.

         MS. SHRIVER:  Okay.  I want to come back to the issue of public safety in a minute.  But first we want to go to Martin.  Thank you, Cecelia, very much.  Martin Howrylak.  He’s a former Republican member of the Michigan House of Representatives, and he’s here with a question about national security.

         Q    Well, thank both of you for being here this afternoon.  I really appreciate your coming to the state of Michigan to — to be here.  I would like to ask: What can the U.S. do politically, economically, or militarily to deter Russia from continuing its war on the independent nation of Ukraine while simultaneously strengthening our own U.S. security interests?

         THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Thank you, Martin. 

         MS. SHRIVER:  Go ahead.

         THE VICE PRESIDENT:  So, I was actually in Munich at the Munich Security Conference delivering a speech when I first met with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine, and it was just days before Russia invaded. 

         I’ve now met with President Zelenskyy, I think, seven times, because the United States has rightly taken a position as a leader — a global leader on international rules and norms — that we must stand in support of one of the most important international rules and norms, which is the importance of protecting sovereignty and territorial integrity, the importance of standing strong in opposition to the notion that, in this case, Russia would attempt to change borders by force, to invade another nation — a sovereign nation by force. 

         And sadly, there is a huge difference between my opponent and me on this very fundamental issue. 

         Back to the conversation about — there was a time when we used to — there was a phrase that I’ll paraphrase that, basically, politics ends at the — at the sea line, at the — at the — you know, at the — the boundaries of our country, that there are certain things — in particular, the matters of national security — where it’s not about partisanship; it’s about where should America stand in terms of supporting our allies and standing for certain principles.

         I’ll — I’ll give you, as a — as a point of reference for me in terms of how I feel about this, on the partisan issue.  

         I — for the four years that I was in the United States Senate, my favorite committee was the Senate Intelligence Committee.  And I served on that committee, and we would meet in a room that’s called a SCIF.  And it’s — it’s basically a — (laughs) — it’s a very secure room.  No press, with all due respect, is allowed in.  No cameras.  Everyone has to leave their cell phone outside. 

         It’s a bipartisan committee, and we would go in that room and receive classified information from America’s intelligence community, sometimes our military leaders, about hot spots around the world and threats to our national security.  And when we went in that room — and this is why it was my favorite committee — people would take off their suit jacket, roll up their sleeves, have a cup of coffee on the table.  And we weren’t Democrats or Republicans; we were Americans. 

         And that is so important on a number of issues we are discussing this afternoon but, in particular, on national security. 

         My opponent, however, has made it a thing of his to admire dictators and autocrats around the world.  He exchanged love letters with Kim Jong Un.  Remember that?  He has openly praised the president of Russia. 

         Most recently, the report is, in the height of COVID — remember everyone was scrambling to get their hands on COVID tests?  Remember when Americans were dying by the hundreds every day?  And Donald Trump secretly sent COVID tests to the president of Russia for his personal use. 

         He has said — Donald Trump — “I will solve the matter of Ukraine and Russia in a day.”  Read through and understand what he is saying.  He would surrender.  He would have Ukraine surrender its fight against an aggressor violating its sovereignty. 

         If Donald Trump were president, Vladimir Putin will be sitting in Kyiv.  And understand what that would mean for America and our standing around the world. 

         But thankfully, there has been bipartisan support — and to your point of what — where you stand — on this very fundamental issue.  But this is a — this is a very vivid example of what is at stake in this election.  Because Donald Trump has been very clear: He would give away the shop.  He has been manipulated and is so clearly able to be manipulated by favor and flattery, including from dictators and autocrats around the world. 

         And America knows that that is not how we stand.  That is not how we fight.  We fight in favor of our strength and our role as a leader in bringing the Allies together and standing for foundational and fundamental principles.

         MS. SHRIVER:  Congressman Cheney — (applause) — I know, kind of, the issue of national security is one of the big reasons you’re here and supporting the vice president.  Can you expand on that answer and add your thoughts to it?

         MS. CHENEY:  Yeah.  You know, I think that if — if you look at where the Republican Party is today, there’s been a really dangerous embrace of isolationism, a dangerous embrace of tyrants. 

         The president, you know, even just today, he heaps praise on the world’s most evil people while he attacks, you know, with venom, his political opponents here at home. 

         And, you know, the — the reality is that since the end of World War II, America has led.  And we’ve led — and that has been necessary to defend our freedom.  And we can’t do it by ourselves, though.  We need our allies. 

         And when Donald Trump says that he’s going to withdraw from NATO, when he invites Vladimir Putin to invade NATO, when he suggests that it is Zelenskyy’s fault that Ukraine was invaded, I mean that is — that i- —

         For anybody who is a Republican who is thinking that, you know, they might vote for Donald Trump because of national security policy, I ask you, please, please study his national security policy.  Not only is it not Republican, it’s dangerous.  And without allies, America will find our very freedom and security challenged and threatened. 

         And one final point on this: Don’t think that Congress can stop him. 

         THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

         MS. CHENEY:  People say, “Well, you know what, he can’t really do the worst, you know, because Congress will step in.”  All he has to do is what he’s doing — is say, “I won’t fulfill our NATO treaty obligations,” and — and NATO begins to unravel. 

         So, it is — it is an incredibly dangerous thing to think about a foreign policy, a national security policy led by somebody who is — is as unstable as Donald Trump is.  And it’s a risk we just simply can’t take as a nation. 

         MS. SHRIVER:  Thank you.

         THE VICE PRESIDENT:  And I’m going to add for emphasis that — let’s also be clear about on the subject, specifically of Ukraine, Donald Trump’s approach would be to surrender.  Understand what that would mean.  That is signaling to the president of Russia he can get away with what he has done. 

    Understand — look at the map — Poland would be next.  NATO, our Allies, are — the reason that they have been so thankful for the position of strength we have taken in bringing the Allies together is because they are fully aware of and remember — to the congresswoman’s point — World War II.  Remember, this — this concept of isolation — we were once there as a nation, and then Pearl Harbor happened. 

    Let’s remember recent history.  Europe remembers it well.  We — then when we got attacked, Pearl Harbor, we jumped in, and it is because America jumped in that we were ultimately able to win that war, and it should be a constant reminder to us — we have to remember history — that isolationism, which is exactly what Donald Trump is pushing — pull out of NATO, abandon our friends — isolationism is not insulation.  It is not insulation.  It will not insulate us from harm in terms of our national security. 

    So, I say that to emphasize a point that the congresswoman made, and the other point I’d make is also check out where he’s been on how he thinks about America’s military and service members.  One of the great, great American heroes, a prisoner of war, John McCain.  Remember how he talked about John McCain?  He said he didn’t like him because he got caught. 

    You look — he’s called members of our military “suckers” and “losers.”  And then look at how some of the highest-ranking members of our military, including what I mentioned earlier, the chairman — the former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a dedicated member, leader in our mil- — in America’s military, how he has assessed Donald Trump — fascism “to his core.”

    So, there we are.

    MS. SHRIVER:  There are your talking points for the kitchen table.  (Applause.)

    Our final question is from Courtney.  Courtney, can you stand?  Courtney is — Courtney Gabbara Agrusa is a wife, a mom, an attorney, and she’s a proud Chaldean, and she is here with a question.  Courtney.

    Q    Thank you so much.  Good evening, Madam Vice President Harris and Representative Cheney.  My name is Courtney Gabbara Agrusa, and I am a first-generation Chaldean American.  Chaldeans are Indigenous Iraqis who are Catholic, and we are predominantly in the metro Detroit area.  Chaldeans are a very close-knit community, but the recent political climate has really begun to divide us. 

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

    Q    While I know that you have discussed several bipartisan proposals over the course of your campaign, what would you say to people like myself who are part of these traditionally conservative communities who want to move forward, but are feeling the pref- — the pressures of the political divide?

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Thank you.  And I’ve actually met with — with members and leaders in the Chaldean community, and thank you for being here. 

    You know, I think that there is something at stake that is about core values, as well as what is at stake in terms of the risk and the danger.  And I would offer you an example of what I think would be an important issue that would affect the Chaldean community and all Americans, for example, the issue of — of how we think about health care in America. 

    So, I know enough about the culture and to know that it is reflective of who we are as Americans in general.  We respect our elders; we take care of them.  So, I will share with you a specific proposal that is an extension of how I think about things. 

    I — actually a personal story, I took care of my mother when she was sick.  And for anyone taking care of or who has taken care of an elder relative, you know what that is.  It’s about trying to cook something they feel like eating.  It is trying to find clothes that don’t irritate their skin or help them put on a sweater.  It’s about trying to figure out something you can say that will bring a smile to their face or make them laugh.  It’s about dignity. 

    And we now have, in particular in our country, a lot of people doing that and also raising young kids.  We call them the sandwich generation, right in the middle.  It’s a lot.  And the way the system currently works — well, God willing, you may have enough resources, you can hire somebody to come in and help. 

    If not, you may have to spend down all of your savings to be able to qualify for Medicaid or you may have to quit your job to be able to do what you need to do to take care of your children and take care of your relative — your older relative.  That’s just not right, and it’s not fair. 

    So, part of my proposal and the plan is that we’re going to now reconfigure so that Medicare covers home health care for our seniors, right?  It’s about dignity.  (Applause.)

    So, in addition to everything that we’ve discussed already about national security, what is at stake — something like this, because I absolutely do believe America is ready for a new generation of leadership that is taking on issues clear-eyed about what is going on that affects everybody — it doesn’t matter their political party; issues that are fundamentally about dignity, also about economic issues; and taking it on in a way that we relieve the American people of the burdens that get in the way of productivity and a certain quality of life.  And this is one example of that. 

    I believe we need to have an economy that I call an opportunity economy, where everyone has the opportunity to thrive — not just get by but get ahead. 

    And this is one example I would offer under the broader point, which is about, let’s move forward, taking on problems from a commonsense approach that is about just practical work. 

    Look, I am a capitalist.  I am a pragmatic capitalist.  I will work as I have with the private sector.  I believe we have to invest in America’s economy and in America’s industry and America’s entrepreneurs, and we can, at the same time, take care of those that are the most in need of just a little support to be able to not just get by but get ahead.

    MS. SHRIVER:  Thank you, Courtney. 

    Liz, I just want to — we have two minutes left — (applause) — and when you hear the phrase a “new way forward,” when you hear “country over party,” what does that mean to you? 

    We’re two weeks out, what does a new way forward mean for families like everybody here, for your children, my children, everybody’s children, young men?

    MS. CHENEY:  Yeah, I —

    MS. SHRIVER:  What is it like?

    MS. CHENEY:  I think that, you know, we’re — we’re at a moment now where, when you think about America and — and the beacon of hope that we have been for so many years for so many communities, also how tremendously enriched we have been by communities — immigrants who want to come here and build a life, all of that depends upon fundamentally defending the rule of law, fundamentally defending our Constitution.  That’s — that’s what makes all of our opportunity and our freedom possible.

    And — and at the same time that we’re that beacon for the world, you know, it’s also because — because we’re a good nation —

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

    MS. CHENEY:  — and because you know when — when you — when you look at who our leader is going to be, what — what Donald Trump represents is — is, in many ways, just cruel and — and not — not the kind of dignity and — and the kind of person that we all want to be able to look up to. 

    But — but what I would say is that if people are uncertain, if people are thinking, “Well, you know, I’m a conservative, I don’t know that I can support Vice President Harris,” I would say I don’t know if anybody is more conservative than I am.  (Laughter.)  And — and I understand the most conservative value there is is to defend the Constitution.  And if we don’t come together to do that then — (applause) —

    And so, just to — to finish that, I would say, to me, a new way forward is this: It’s what you’re seeing up here.  It’s having a president who will listen, having a president who will say, “I’m not, you know, necessarily sure I agree with you on this issue or that issue, but let’s talk about it.”

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

    MS. CHENEY:  “Why do you want, you know, that policy?  Why do you believe that?”  Someone who is willing to honor and respect all perspectives and points of views.  And there’s only one candidate in this race who does that, and that’s Vice President Harris.  (Applause.)

    MS. SHRIVER:  In fact, a lot of polling of undecided voters who call themselves “the exhausted majority” said, I just want leaders who listen —

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

    MS. SHRIVER:  — to one another.  I just want leaders who speak respectfully to one another.  I want to see decency.  I want to see people I can look up to.  And, unfortunately, that’s considered a new way forward as the — as Representative Cheney —

    MS. CHENEY:  Yeah, let’s do that.  Let’s do that. 

    MS. SHRIVER:  Yeah, let’s do that.

    MS. CHENEY:  Yeah, let’s do that. 

    MS. SHRIVER:  Let’s make that a way forward. 

    The final word, Madam Vice President.  You know, everybody I talked to says, you know, “I have to turn off the news.  I can’t read anything.  I’m meditating.  I’m doing yoga.  I’m doing — I’m so anxious.  I just don’t even know.  I’m eating gummies.”  All kinds of things, you know?  (Laughter.) 

    What are you doing?  What are you doing —

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Not eating gummies.  (Laughter and applause.)

    MS. SHRIVER:  Okay, we got that clear.  But how do you — I mean, how do you handle this — the anxiety, the stress, the turmoil?  Everybody is freaked out.  I — I talked to the gentleman up there, and he’s like, “I’m so scared.” 

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  Yeah.

    MS. SHRIVER:  A woman was like, “I’m so anxious.  I can’t sleep.”  Do you sleep?

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  You know, I wake up in the middle of the night usually these days, to be honest with you, but I work out every morning.  I — I think that’s really important to just kind of — you know, mind, body, and spirit. 

    But let me — let me just say this —

    MS. SHRIVER:  No, say more about that.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  — we — but I —

    MS. SHRIVER:  Say more.

    THE VICE PRESIDENT:  — but — I will.  I work out.  I try to eat well.  You know, I love my family, and I make sure that I talk to the kids and my husband every day.  We’ve been — Doug and I’ve been kind of tr- — you know, traveling.  We’re trying to cover a lot of ground, so we’re not with each other every day these days, but my family grounds me in every way. 

    But let me, if I can just speak to the — what people are feeling.  You — we cannot despair.  We cannot despair.  You know, the nature of a democracy is such that I think there’s a duality. 

    On the one hand, there’s an incredible strength when our democracy is intact, an incredible strength in what it does to protect the freedoms and rights of its people.  Oh, there’s great strength in that.  And it is very fragile.  It is only as strong as our willingness to fight for it.  And so, that’s the moment we’re in. 

    And I say, do not despair, because in a democracy, as long as we can keep it — in our democracy, the people, every individual has the power to make a decision about what this will be, and that’s — and so let’s not feel powerless.  Let’s not let the som- — and I get it — overwhelming nature of this all make us feel powerless, because then we have been defeated, and that’s not our character as the American people. 

    We are not one to be defeated.  We rise to a moment, and we stand on broad shoulders of people who have fought this fight before for our country.  And in many ways, let us look at the challenge then that we are being presented and not be overwhelmed by it.  The baton is now in our hands to fight for — not against, but for — this country we love. 

    That’s what we have the power to do.  So, let’s own that — dare I say, be joyful in what we will do in the process of owning that, which is knowing that we can and will build community and coalitions and remind people that we’re all in this together.  Let’s not let the overwhelming nature of this strip us of our strength. 

    That’s how I feel about this.  (Applause.)  You know, that’s how I feel about this.  You know?  Yeah.  

    MS. SHRIVER:  So, I want to — I want to thank everybody here.  You heard from the vice president, from Congresswoman Cheney, do not despair.  I think you got a great glimpse into who this woman is, who this woman is, what brings them together, why they’re here, why they want to earn your vote, why they wanted to speak with you today. 

    And I want to leave you with this quote from Ralph Waldo Emerson that I think speaks to this moment.  It says,

    “Whatever course you decide upon, there is always someone to tell you that you’re wrong.  There are always difficulties arising which tempt you to believe that your critics are right.  To map out a course of action and follow it to the end requires great courage.” 

    So, I leave you with that.  All of you are courageous people.  Do not despair. 

    Thank you so much for spending your time.  Brava.  (Applause.)

                                 END                5:18 P.M. EDT

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Marlborough Sounds blue cod review – measures to reduce fishing pressure and improve fishery health

    Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

    Have your say

    Fisheries New Zealand is seeking your ideas and feedback on proposed changes to the blue cod (rāwaru) seasonal closure in the Marlborough Sounds (Te Tauihu-o-te-waka) to reduce fishing pressure.

    Your input is also sought in developing a package of wider potential measures to ensure long-term sustainability of the fishery. Submissions can be made by email or post using the form provided, before 5pm on 1 December 2024.

    Public drop-in information sessions

    During consultation, we will be holding public drop-in sessions to present information, answer questions, and assist you with making a submission. These will be hosted by Fisheries New Zealand officials and Marlborough Sounds Blue Cod Technical Group members at:

    • Tasman Bay Cruising Club in Nelson/Whakatū on Tuesday, 12 November (4.30pm to 7.30pm) 
    • Queen Charlotte Yacht Club in Picton/Waitohi on Thursday, 14 November ( 4.30pm to 7.30pm).

    About the proposed changes and potential measures

    Marlborough Sounds blue cod are a taonga which play an important role in the local ecosystem, and support an iconic fishery for many Kiwis.

    Over the years, pressure on the stock has increased, with high fishing effort and cumulative stressors such as sedimentation, benthic disturbance, and marine heatwaves.

    Independent surveys and reports from many fishers and long-time residents demonstrate low levels of abundance, and a growing community concern about the sustainability of the stock. In 2021, a potting survey indicated that significant overfishing is very likely occurring and retrospectively has been for a significant time.

    In response, the then Minister for Oceans and Fisheries in 2022 decided to cut the commercial catch limit, or TACC, and form a multi-sector group to identify measures to reduce fishing pressure.

    This group (the Marlborough Sounds Blue Cod Technical Group) met throughout 2023, and provided the Minister with a report of their findings. FNZ is now consulting on a potential change to the seasonal closure in the Marlborough Sounds, and seeking input in developing a package of wider measures to ensure long-term sustainability.

    Consultation documents:

    Summary of proposals:

    Proposal to extend the seasonal closure (from December 2025):

    • Extending the seasonal closure to all blue cod take, from 1 September – 19 December currently, to 31 December, 5 January, or 15 January.

    Potential measures that could be considered for a wider package

    • Spawning recovery areas, to rebuild spawning populations across the Sounds.
    • Reducing the combined daily bag limit from 20 finfish currently, to 10 or 6 finfish.
    • A refreshed educational campaign – how can we maximise outreach and provide the right information for fishers to minimise their impacts?
    • Options to enhance fine-scale recreational fishing information – voluntary catch reporting, survey mailing lists, additional monitoring, or any other ideas.
    • Tools to mitigate predation and release mortality – what is your experience with these issues and potential solutions?

    Related information:

    Plans and strategies

    Rules and legislation

    Science and monitoring

    Making your submission

    Fisheries New Zealand welcomes your views on the topics above and encourages you to use the submission template provided with your rationale and supporting. You can make your submission anytime before consultation closes on Sunday, 1 December 2024, at 5pm.

    Submission form [DOCX, 84 KB]

    Email your submission to FMsubmissions@mpi.govt.nz

    While we prefer email, you can also post written submissions to:

    Marlborough Sounds Blue Cod Review
    Fisheries New Zealand
    Private Bag 14
    Nelson 7042
    New Zealand

    If you require hard copies of the consultation document or any other information, email FMsubmissions@mpi.govt.nz

    Submissions are public information

    Note that all, part, or a summary of your submission may be published on this website. Most often this happens when we issue a document that reviews the submissions received.

    People can also ask for copies of submissions under the Official Information Act 1982 (OIA). The OIA says we must make the content of submissions available unless we have good reason for withholding it. Those reasons are detailed in sections 6 and 9 of the OIA.

    If you think there are grounds to withhold specific information from publication, make this clear in your submission or contact us. Reasons may include that it discloses commercially sensitive or personal information. However, any decision MPI makes to withhold details can be reviewed by the Ombudsman, who may direct us to release it.

    Official Information Act 1982 – NZ Legislation

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – European Parliament approves more efficient and greener EU airspace

    Source: European Parliament

    On Tuesday, MEPs paved the way for improved management of European airspace, enabling more direct flights and fewer delays, and supporting climate neutrality.

    The reform of Single European Sky rules, already agreed upon in negotiations with the Council last March, strengthens national performance plans for air navigation services and will help to improve EU airspace management. These plans will have binding targets and incentives to make flights more efficient and environmentally friendly. An independent advisory Performance Review Board would be set up to help the Commission and EU member states in taking decisions on implementing these plans.

    In addition, the Commission will adopt EU performance targets on capacity, cost efficiency, climate and environmental factors for air navigation services, to be reviewed at least every three years.

    Greener air navigation charges

    MEPs secured a provision that tasks the Commission with assessing how charges levied on airspace users (airlines or private planes operators) for providing air navigation services could encourage them to become more environmentally friendly, for example by using the most fuel-efficient available routing or alternative clean propulsion technologies.

    More competition

    Another key demand of MEPs during the negotiations was to encourage competition in the air navigation services market. The new bill includes the possibility for air-traffic service providers to procure other air navigation services, such as communication, meteorological or aeronautical information services, under market conditions.

    Quotes

    “The reform is a step forward in removing bottlenecks, creating more efficient air traffic control and management, and reducing costs and emissions through shorter and safer flights, from which all European airlines, and especially European citizens, will benefit. The creation of a truly single European airspace, however, has been blocked by member states, unwilling to give up national powers for the greater good. I now call on member states to constructively implement this reform”, said EP co-rapporteur Jens Gieseke (EPP, DE).

    “Today, Europe’s airspace is like a big jigsaw puzzle where each country has its own piece, but unfortunately not all the pieces fit together. This leads to detours, waiting times and unnecessary costs. In 2023, almost three out of ten flights were delayed by more than 15 minutes. The new rules will make aviation safer, more punctual and more climate-friendly”, added EP co-rapporteur Johan Danielsson (S&D, SE) and also thanked former rapporteurs Marian-Jean Marinescu (EPP, Romania) and Bogusław Liberadzki (S&D, PL) for their work.

    Next steps

    Both co-legislators have now approved the new rules– the Council did so on 26 September. They will enter into force 20 days after publication in the Official Journal of the EU. While most of the provisions will apply from that date, other provisions (e.g. penalties for infringing the new rules; national supervisory authority’s independence) will only take effect two years later.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Social clause in sustainable fisheries partnership agreements – E-002060/2024

    Source: European Parliament

    14.10.2024

    Question for written answer  E-002060/2024
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Isabelle Le Callennec (PPE)

    The Commission recently amended the social clause in sustainable fisheries partnership agreements (SFPAs). This clause requires EU vessels to comply with decisions, such as that on the basic minimum wage for seafarers, made by the Joint Maritime Commission of the International Labour Organisation (ILO). It does not cite either ILO Convention No 188 on Work in Fishing or Directive 2017/159.

    In December 2023, the Commission informed the social partners in the Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee on Sea-Fisheries (SSDC-F) that it did not have the authority to set a minimum wage in SFPAs. However, in April, July and then September 2024, it proceeded to send them three successive versions of the same social clause. The first imposed the basic minimum wage for seafarers, doing away with the share remuneration system. The second saw the Commission row back, stating that the minimum wage was no longer compulsory, only for that to be reversed two months later by a third clause, with the Commission blaming a translation error in the July version.

    • 1.Does the Commission have the authority to set a minimum wage in SFPAs? In that context, could the Commission provide the legal opinion set out in Ares(2023)6074027 and Ares(2024)4969475?
    • 2.Can the Commission impose the results of biennial wage negotiations on the fishing sector when its social partners are excluded from those negotiations?

    Submitted: 14.10.2024

    Last updated: 22 October 2024

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: AFCD holds “Sail into Fun” Leisure Fisheries Expo (with photos)

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

         â€‹The Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) is holding the “Sail into Fun” Leisure Fisheries Expo today and tomorrow (October 19 and 20) at Domain Mall in Yau Tong. The Expo showcases the diversity of local leisure fisheries activities through a series of workshops, guided tours, seminars, plays and sales booths featuring fisheries products.

         Officiating at the opening ceremony, the Under Secretary for Environment and Ecology, Miss Diane Wong, remarked that the “Sail into Fun” Leisure Fisheries Expo is one of the key promotional initiatives aiming at facilitating the development of local leisure fisheries, as outlined in the Blueprint for the Sustainable Development of Agriculture and Fisheries. Through participating in a variety of leisure fisheries activities, members of the public can experience and understand the heritage of fisheries’ history and culture, as well as recognise Hong Kong’s precious marine and cultural resources. This initiative aims at promoting the blue economy, facilitating the sustainable development of fisheries, and creating new opportunities for the development of both the fisheries and tourism industries.

         The “Sail into Fun” Leisure Fisheries Expo brings together a range of unique leisure fisheries-related activities across Hong Kong, including workshops on fish net weaving, pearl and shell jewellery making, salted fish curing, Gyotaku printing and fish sketching. Additionally, there are Lei Yue Mun Sam Ka Tsuen guided tours and plays showcasing the culture of fishermen. The Expo also features a variety of unique seminars, including firsthand accounts from fishermen about the culture of a fishing village, experts’ sharing on the history of local pearl cultivation and tips on selecting different fisheries products. These activities foster public appreciation of fisheries’ history and culture through the imprints left by the fishermen and the fisheries industry of the past. There are also sales booths offering high-quality local fisheries products and fishery-related handicrafts for members of the public to purchase on-site.

         The “Sail into Fun” Leisure Fisheries Expo is open from noon to 7pm. Members of the public are invited to join for free. No prior registration is required for the seminars and plays, while a limited number of seats for the workshops and the guided tours are available on-site for reservation. The event schedule can be found in the Annex.

         Developing leisure fisheries is one of the key directions outlined in the Blueprint. Through integrating fisheries culture and ecological resources, the Government aims to assist the upgrade and transformation of the industry. The AFCD will continue to provide fishermen with training courses, exchanges and field visits related to leisure fisheries, and encourage the trade to launch pilot projects of developing leisure fisheries activities based on commercial modes of operation through funding support from the Sustainable Fisheries Development Fund. The AFCD will, at the same time, enhance promotion of local leisure fisheries, as well as explore suitable modes of development for leisure fisheries in Hong Kong and opportunities for jointly developing leisure fisheries in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.         

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI USA: News 10/17/2024 Blackburn, Duckworth Introduce Bill to Increase Access to Advanced Wheelchairs

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn)

    NASHVILLE, Tenn. – U.S. Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn) and Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) introduced the Choices for Increased Mobility Act to increase access to wheelchairs made with advanced materials by allowing Medicare beneficiaries to upgrade to lighter, more functional wheelchairs without bearing the entire upfront cost. These manual wheelchairs help prevent shoulder injuries, enhance maneuverability, and reduce overall pain and fatigue for users. 

    “Too many Americans with disabilities face unnecessary barriers to obtaining the best mobility equipment to meet their needs,” said Senator Blackburn. “By making it easier for Medicare beneficiaries to upgrade to wheelchairs made with advanced, lighter materials like carbon fiber and titanium, this bipartisan bill would help improve the quality of life for countless individuals. I’m pleased to work with Senator Duckworth to reduce financial burdens on those who rely on these essential devices and ensure that more people have access to the mobility solutions they deserve.”

     “For too long, Medicare recipients have struggled to access lighter, more functional wheelchairs that would help them get around more easily while putting significantly less strain on their bodies,” said Senator Duckworth. “Our bipartisan legislation would help ensure Medicare recipients are better able to access the wheelchairs they need to live healthier, more independent lives—with minimal cost to the federal government. It’s a win-win.”
    BACKGROUND
    Complex Rehab Technology (CRT) is a specialized subset of the Durable Medical Equipment benefit, which includes highly configurable manual and power wheelchairs, adaptive seating, and positioning systems. Among these, manual wheelchairs constructed from advanced materials like carbon fiber and titanium are significantly stronger and lighter than standard aluminum wheelchairs.
    When the Medicare billing code for ultra-lightweight manual wheelchairs was established in 1993, materials like titanium and carbon fiber were not considered, as they were not yet in use for wheelchairs. As a result, CRT providers have struggled to supply wheelchairs with these advanced materials at the fee schedule amounts set by Medicare.
    Historically, Medicare allowed beneficiaries who met medical necessity requirements to upgrade their equipment by paying the difference between standard and upgraded materials. However, a policy change in 2016 removed this option, requiring beneficiaries to prepay the entire cost of the wheelchair out-of-pocket and await reimbursement for the standard portion, significantly limiting access to these advanced wheelchairs.
    CHOICES FOR INCREASED MOBILITY ACT
    The Choices for Increased Mobility Act would create two new billing codes for ultra-lightweight manual wheelchairs: one for base models and another for those constructed with titanium or carbon fiber. This change would allow Medicare beneficiaries to upgrade to lighter, more functional wheelchairs without bearing the entire upfront cost. Instead, beneficiaries would only pay for the cost of the specialized materials, significantly reducing their financial burden.
    This bill aims to restore the option for beneficiaries to choose and pay for advanced materials for their wheelchairs without removing medical necessity requirements. It would ensure that Medicare covers the standard portion of the wheelchair cost, with beneficiaries responsible only for the upgraded materials.
    ENDORSEMENTS
    This legislation is supported by the American Association for Homecare, Permobil Americas, National Coalition for Assistive and Rehab Technology, National Registry for Rehabilitation Technology Suppliers, Clinical Task Force, The VGM Group, U.S. Rehab, Association for Tennessee Home Oxygen & Medical Equipment Services, Great Lakes Home Medical Services Association, Midwest Association for Medical Equipment Services, Southwest Medical Equipment Suppliers Association, Alabama Durable Medical Equipment Association, Michigan HomeCare & Hospice Association, Pennsylvania Association of Medical Suppliers, Georgia Association of Medical Equipment Suppliers, Texas Medical Equipment Providers Association, Home Medical Equipment and Services Association of New England, Georgia Association of Medical Equipment Suppliers, Florida Alliance of Home Care Services, Atlantic Coast Medical Equipment Services Association, Northeast Medical Equipment Providers Association, Nevada Association of Medical Product Suppliers, Big Sky Association of Home Medical Equipment Suppliers, Pacific Association for Medical Equipment Services, Colorado Association for Medical Equipment Services, California Association of Medical Product Suppliers, Ohio Association of Medical Equipment Services, and Arkansas Medical Equipment Providers. 
    “We are so fortunate to be able to work with leaders like Senator Blackburn and Senator Duckworth who share our passion for supporting people with disabilities,” said Tom Ryan, President & CEO of the American Association for Homecare. “Their work to improve access to lightweight wheelchairs is the latest example of their commitment to ensuring people with mobility challenges can remain actively engaged in their communities.”
    “Our mission will always be to enable those with disabilities to live life with independence by providing aides of the same technical standards that we all use in our daily lives. S. 5154 is a common sense, budget neutral solution that empowers individuals with the choice to access to the many benefits of titanium or carbon fiber wheelchair frames,” said Chuck Witkowski, President of Permobil Americas. “We are immensely grateful to Senators Blackburn and Duckworth and thank them for their continued leadership and support of this community.”
    Click here for bill text.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: 52 Bipartisan Congressmembers Urge Biden Administration to Tighten Russian Oil Sanctions and Question Exception Approval

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Lloyd Doggett (D-TX)

    Contact: Alexis Torres, Alexis.Torres@mail.house.gov

    Washington, D.C.—U.S. Representatives Lloyd Doggett (D-TX-37) and Jake Auchincloss (D-MA-4) led a bipartisan effort to demand a tightening of Russian oil sanctions and to question an exception granted to a U.S.-based company, Schlumberger (SLB). Specifically, the lawmakers are questioning Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Secretary Antony Blinken as to why the Biden administration has permitted SLB to serve as an accomplice to Vladimir Putin.

    We write regarding alarming findings that the U.S.-based company and world’s largest oilfield services firm SLB, widely known as Schlumberger, is expanding in Russia,” wrote the members. “Since Russia’s unjustified and illegal full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, SLB has signed new contracts, recruited hundreds of staff, and imported nearly $18 million in equipment into Russia. This U.S.-based company is keeping Vladimir Putin’s war machine well-oiled with financing for the barbaric invasion of Ukraine. We urge you to continue supporting our Ukrainian allies by pursuing more rigorous oil sanctions to effectively restrict Putin’s profits.

    “My name is on the first sanctions legislation to become law shortly after the Russian invasion,” said Rep. Doggett. “Implementation of that and similar legislation by our allies has not prevented Putin from earning billions from oil exports. And unfortunately, North Korea and Iran are not the only places providing him help. By permitting his exports and permitting continued American company investments in Russia, Americans, and our European allies, are essentially funding both sides of this war. While well aware of concerns about the price of gasoline at the pump, we must stop oiling the Putin war machine to win this war, secure a just peace, and reparations.”

    “While Ukrainians fight and die on the front lines of freedom, a U.S. oil company is supporting the enemy,” said Rep. Auchincloss. “Oil is the lifeblood of the Russian war economy, which is why the West must stand united in tightening and enforcing oil sanctions. That begins by holding SLB and its collaborators accountable for evading allied sanctions, profiteering from pain, and fueling Putin’s ability to wage war.”

    Additional signers include Representatives Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (FL-20), Josh Gottheimer (NJ-05), Marcy Kaptur (OH-09), Barbara Lee (CA-12), Wiley Nickel (NC-13), Jared Huffman (CA-02), Dan Goldman (NY-10), Danny Davis (IL-07), Jim Costa (CA-21), Sean Casten (IL-06), Steve Cohen (TN-09), Adam Schiff (CA-30), Susan Wild (PA-07), Joe Wilson (R-SC-02), Hank Johnson (GA-04), Tom Suozzi (NY-03), Brad Sherman (CA-32), Zoe Lofgren (CA-18), Nikema Williams (GA-05), Gerry Connolly (VA-11), Mark Pocan (WI-02), Madeleine Dean (PA-04), Jamie Raskin (MD-08), Earl Blumenaur (OR-03), Seth Magaziner (RI-02), Chris Deluzio (PA-17), Patrick Ryan (NY-18), Chris Smith (R-NJ-04), Bonnie Watson Coleman (NJ-12), Salud Carbajal (CA-24), Raúl Grijalva (AZ-07),  Don Bacon (R-NE-02), Juan Vargas (CA-52), Jerry Nadler (NY-12), Annie Kuster (NH-02), Emanuel Cleaver (MO-05), Frank Pallone (NJ-06), Paul Tonko (NY-20), Adriano Espaillat (NY-13), Ted Lieu (CA-36), John Larson (CT-01), Mike Quigley (IL-05), Jill Tokuda (HI-02), Kweisi Mfume (MD-07), David Trone (MD-06), Seth Moulton (MA-06), Brian Fitzpatrick (PA-01), Stephen Lynch (MA-08), Bennie Thompson (MS-02) and Ro Khanna (CA-17).

    The full letter can be found here.

    Rep. Doggett is a strong champion for a prosperous Ukraine, consistently urging Congress and the Biden administration to take further actions in holding Putin accountable and ensuring full support for a Ukrainian victory. In 2022, the morning after Putin launched his unprovoked and illegal invasion, Rep. Doggett filed the first sanctions legislation, which later became law, to prohibit the direct import of energy products from Russia into the United States. The following year, he introduced the bipartisan Ending Importation of Laundered Russian Oil Act to close a “refining loophole” that allows Russian oil to be laundered through third-party countries and sold in the U.S. as gasoline and other petroleum products—therefore linking American consumers to financing parts of Putin’s war machine. In recent months, Rep. Doggett expanded his efforts to prevent Russia from continuing to profit off Western countries by publishing an opinion piece in Foreign Policy, calling for U.S. sanctions against a network of companies associated with Rosatom, Russia’s state-owned nuclear corporation.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: Seawater intrusion incurs waterlogging on China’s northern coasts

    Source: China State Council Information Office 2

    High tides have poured seawater onto the land in coastal cities in northeast and north China’s Liaoning and Hebei provinces and Tianjin Municipality from Monday, submerging streets and triggering waterlogging.
    In Liaoning, the cities of Dalian, Yingkou, Panjin, Jinzhou and Huludao have suffered urban waterlogging, after the high tide.
    “I’ve lived in the neighborhood for more than 40 years, and I’ve never seen such a severe tidal upsurge,” said Zhang Xinghua, a fisherman at the Erjiegou neighborhood of Panjin.
    Zhang said the neighborhood is located in a low-lying area prone to attacks by tidal waves, especially when nearing winter, but this time the tides were “surprisingly large.”
    The city’s fire department on Monday dispatched 25 fire trucks and 150 firefighters, who took rubber boats for the search and rescue of people trapped in the waterlogging. By Monday night, 72 people were rescued and more than 120 were evacuated.
    As the tides ebbed Monday evening, seawater gradually retreated. Xinhua reporters saw water pumps still working round the clock on the streets in Panjin to drain water.
    “We are still checking risks in low-lying areas. No casualties have been reported,” said Liu Songlin of the sub-district office in Erjiegou.
    Meanwhile, seawater poured into residential houses on Monday in Luannan County, Tangshan City, Hebei Province. Local residents said they have not seen such a large tide in around 30 years.
    In the Binhai New Area of Tianjin Municipality, buses had to temporarily adjust regular routes to avoid the waterlogging area.
    The Liaoning provincial marine monitoring and forecasting center issued a Level-IV sea tide warning at 4 p.m. Monday, saying affected by a cold spell and cyclone, large waves up to 2.5 to 3.5 meters high would appear in the northern part of the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea from Monday night to Tuesday.
    Zhou Guanbo, a senior engineer at the China’s National Meteorological Center, attributed the seawater intrusion in Panjin and other places to storm surge superimposed with astronomical tide. This natural phenomenon leads to abnormal rise in tide water.
    He warned that seawater may affect drinking water safety, agricultural production and industrial production. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Seattle man sentenced for string of marijuana dispensary robberies

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Seattle – A 19-year-old Seattle-area man, was sentenced October 18, 2024, to 90 months in prison for a series of seven armed robberies of marijuana dispensaries, announced U.S. Attorney Tessa M. Gorman. Caiden James Charlton was arrested in June 2023, in connection with three armed robberies in May and June 2023. He pleaded guilty in July 2024 admitting his involvement in all seven robberies. At the sentencing hearing U.S. District Judge Richard A. Jones imposed three years of supervised release to follow prison.

    “This defendant and his juvenile accomplices targeted small businesses – marijuana dispensaries – across our region. With guns drawn they frightened employees grabbing cash and product and in one case even stealing the safe,” said U.S. Attorney Gorman. “This dangerous conduct cannot be tolerated.”

    According to records filed in the case, Charlton pleaded guilty in July 2024 to committing three pot shop robberies on May 30, 2023, The first robbery was of Herb’s House on NW 65th Street in Seattle. The second was West Seattle Cannabis and the third robbery was of Hashtag Cannabis on Nickerson Street in Seattle. On June 10, 2023, Charlton and an accomplice robbed Oz Cannabis on Stone Way in Seattle. The next day, June 11, 2023, Charlton robbed Novel Tree MJ in Bellevue, and on June 12, he robbed Seaweed Cannabis in Edmonds, Washington. Finally, on June 21, he and accomplices robbed Dockside Cannabis in the Ballard neighborhood of Seattle. In each of the robberies, surveillance video shows clothing, tattoos, and jewelry that was linked to Charlton. Victims of the robberies noted distinctive face tattoos around Charlton’s eyes that were not concealed by his mask.

    In each of the robberies, one of two intruders displayed a handgun and ordered the dispensary staff to open safes or empty the till. In addition to money, the suspects stole a large amount of marijuana products. In some cases, the safes at the dispensaries could not be opened due to time locks used to discourage robberies. In one case, the robbers stole the safe by detaching it from the floor.

    The robbery crew would run to a getaway car after the robberies – two of the cars had been reported stolen.

    In asking for an eight-year prison sentence Assistant United States Attorney Todd Greenberg wrote to the court, “The offense conduct in this case is extremely serious. Charlton went on a violent crime spree, robbing seven marijuana dispensaries over the course of 30 days. During each robbery, he and/or his accomplices were armed with firearms and used them – brandishing the guns, pointing them directly at the victims, etc. It is very fortunate that no one was shot or otherwise injured. The Court is well aware that similar robberies often end up with shootings and/or deaths, when victims act in ways not expected by the perpetrators or with the accidental discharge of a firearm.”

    Some the robbery victims wrote to the court about the trauma the robberies caused in their life. One owner wrote, “… these robberies destroyed the business my wife and I worked to build over the nine plus years…. When they walk into a business with guns and demand money and product, the impact goes way beyond the loss of money and product.”

    The case was investigated by the FBI, the Seattle Police Department, and the Bellevue Police Department, as well as the King County and Snohomish County Sheriffs’ Offices.

    The case was prosecuted by former Assistant United States Attorneys Erin H. Becker and Assistant United States Attorney Todd Greenberg. 

    MIL Security OSI