NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Health

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reps. Chu, Jayapal, and Colleagues Demand Answers on Funding Delay for Low-Income Senior Employment Program

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Judy Chu (CA2-27)

    WASHINGTON, DC – Reps. Judy Chu (CA-28) and Pramila Jayapal (WA-07) led 40 of their colleagues in a letter to the Trump Administration demanding the immediate release of federal funding for a vital senior jobs training and community service program. The current delay has left thousands of low-income older Americans without pay and deprived communities of needed services.

    In their letter to Department of Labor (DOL) Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russell Vought, the Members urged the immediate release of funding for national grantees of the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP). Through SCSEP, low-income seniors receive jobs training, earn a paycheck, and in return provide essential services to their communities. In Program Year (PY) 2022, over 42,000 seniors provided over 20.4 million hours of community service.

    The letter emphasizes that SCSEP grantees rely on the DOL’s timely release of the Training and Employment Guidance Letter (TEGL), which provides annual allotments for grantees. Although the PY2025 TEGL for state and territorial grantees was published on July 1, 2025—the start of the Program Year—the DOL has still not published a TEGL for national grantees and has not provided a timeline for its publication.

    This delay has impacted national grantees operating in California, Washington, Indiana, North Carolina, and Oklahoma, among others.

    “We have already begun to see the devastating impacts of this delay,” wrote the Members. “For example, the National Asian Pacific Center on Aging (NAPCA), a 501(c)(3) nonprofit and SCSEP national grantee, based in Washington, which serves limited-English proficient older adults from various ethnic groups, has already furloughed 800 low-income seniors due to this funding uncertainty.” 

    “Because there is no clear timeline for when furloughs will end, this uncertainty is causing deep distress among program participants, many of whom live paycheck to paycheck and rely on the income they earn through SCSEP to make ends meet. The funding delay is also harming entire communities, as nonprofits and other local businesses are losing the critical support of SCSEP-supported trainees and volunteers due to furloughs,” the Members continued.

    The letter concludes by urging DOL and OMB to expend PY25 SCSEP funds to national grantees immediately and make them retroactive to July 1, 2025. 

    This letter is endorsed by: the National Asian Pacific American Center for Aging, Easterseals, Goodwill Industries International, National Caucus & Center on Black Aging (NCBA), Life Skills of America, Inc., The WorkPlace, Easterseals-Goodwill Northern Rocky Mountain Inc., Diverse Elders Coalition, National Urban League, National Hispanic Council on Aging (NHCOA), National Council on Aging (NCOA), Institute for Indian Development, Inc., and the Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum (APIAHF).

    Click here to access the full letter.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Biggs Urges Senate Leadership to Preserve Spending Cuts in the House Rescission Package

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Andy Biggs (AZ-05)

    Today, Congressman Andy Biggs (R-AZ) led a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune urging the Senate to preserve the entire $9.4 billion in spending cuts contained in the House rescission package. The Senate has a chance to prove its commitment to President Trump’s America First mandate by passing the long-overdue cuts targeting wasteful bloat. Provisions in the House rescission package include:

    • $1.07 billion in cuts to National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS);
    • $900 million in cuts to Global Health Programs promoting abortion pills, LGBTQ+ activism, and DEI dogma abroad;
    • $125 million in cuts to the Clean Technology Fund (CTF), a vehicle for funneling billions into Green New Deal-style projects in foreign nations.

    “At $37+ trillion in debt, our nation is careening toward a financial cliff,” said Congressman Biggs. 

    “$9.4 billion is a small drop in the bucket of wasteful spending that must be reined in, but cutting taxpayer dollars to mouthpieces for the Left and radical, woke programs abroad is a commonsense start. If Congress refuses to support modest cuts like those included in the House’s rescission package, fiscal doom is inevitable.

    “I urge the Senate to stand firm and reject the D.C. status quo. Preserve the cuts passed by the House.”

    Cosigners of the letter include: Rep. Ralph Norman (R-SC), Rep. Mark Harris (R-NC), Rep. Clay Higgins (R-LA), Rep. Tom Tiffany (R-WI), Rep. Scott Perry (R-PA), Rep. Keith Self (R-TX), Rep. Michael Cloud (R-TX), Rep. Barry Moore (R-AL), Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN), Rep. Josh Brecheen (R-OK), Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-GA), Rep. Sheri Biggs (R-SC), Rep. Eli Crane (R-AZ), and Rep. Andy Harris (R-MD).

    Fox News covered the letter here.

    The letter may be read here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Diversified Royalty Corp. Announces Filing of Final Short Form Base Shelf Prospectus

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Diversified Royalty Corp. (TSX: DIV and DIV.DB.A) (the “Corporation” or “DIV”) announced today that it has filed, and received receipt for, a final short form base shelf prospectus (the “Prospectus”). The Prospectus was filed with the securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces and territories of Canada. DIV’s prior short form base shelf prospectus dated June 19, 2023, expired on July 19, 2025. Accordingly, DIV filed the Prospectus to maintain financial flexibility and efficient access to Canadian capital markets to pursue strategic initiatives. A copy of the Prospectus is available under DIV’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

    The Prospectus is valid for a 25-month period during which time DIV may, from time to time, issue common shares, warrants, subscription receipts, debt securities, convertible securities or rights or any combination thereof, including in the form of units (collectively, the “Securities”). The specific terms of any offering of Securities will be described in one or more shelf prospectus supplements which will be filed at the time of the offering of such Securities. There is no certainty any Securities will be offered or sold under the Prospectus within the 25-month effective period.  

    About Diversified Royalty Corp.

    DIV is a multi-royalty corporation, engaged in the business of acquiring top-line royalties from well-managed multi-location businesses and franchisors in North America. DIV’s objective is to acquire predictable, growing royalty streams from a diverse group of multi-location businesses and franchisors.

    DIV currently owns the Mr. Lube + Tires, AIR MILES®, Sutton, Mr. Mikes, Nurse Next Door, Oxford Learning Centres, Stratus Building Solutions, BarBurrito and Cheba Hut trademarks. Mr. Lube + Tires is the leading quick lube service business in Canada, with locations across Canada. AIR MILES® is Canada’s largest coalition loyalty program. Sutton is among the leading residential real estate brokerage franchisor businesses in Canada. Mr. Mikes operates casual steakhouse restaurants primarily in western Canadian communities. Nurse Next Door is a home care provider with locations across Canada and the United States as well as in Australia. Oxford Learning Centres is one of Canada’s leading franchisee supplemental education services. Stratus Building Solutions is a leading commercial cleaning service franchise company providing comprehensive janitorial, building cleaning, and office cleaning services primarily in the United States. BarBurrito is the largest quick service Mexican restaurant food chain in Canada. Cheba Hut is a fast casual toasted sub sandwich franchise with locations in the United States.

    DIV’s objective is to increase cash flow per share by making accretive royalty purchases and through the growth of purchased royalties. DIV intends to continue to pay a predictable and stable monthly dividend to shareholders and increase the dividend over time, in each case as cash flow per share allows.

    Forward-Looking Information

    Certain statements contained in this news release may constitute “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws that involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. The use of any of the words “anticipate”, “continue”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, “may”, “will”, ”project”, “should”, “believe”, “confident”, “plan” and “intends” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking information, although not all forward-looking information contains these identifying words. Specifically, forward-looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, statements made in relation to: the Prospectus being filed to provide DIV with financial flexibility

    and efficient access to Canadian capital markets to pursue strategic initiatives; the specific terms of any offering of Securities will be described in one or more shelf prospectus supplements which will be filed at the time of the offering of such Securities; DIV’s objective to continue to pay predictable and stable monthly dividends to shareholders; and DIV’s corporate objectives. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results or events, performance, or achievements of DIV to differ materially from those anticipated or implied by such forward-looking information.

    DIV believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking information included in this news release are reasonable but no assurance can be given that these expectations will prove to be correct. In particular there can be no assurance that: DIV will complete any offerings of Securities under the Prospectus; DIV will be able to make monthly dividend payments to the holders of its common shares; or DIV will achieve any of its corporate objectives. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned that forward-looking information included in this news release are not guarantees of future performance, and such forward-looking information should not be unduly relied upon. More information about the risks and uncertainties affecting DIV’s business and the businesses of its royalty partners can be found in the “Risk Factors” section of its Annual Information Form dated March 24, 2025 and in its most recent Management’s Discussion and Analysis, copies of each of which are available under DIV’s profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

    In formulating the forward-looking information contained herein, management has assumed that, among other things: DIV will complete one or more offerings of Securities under the Prospectus and one or more shelf prospectus supplements and DIV will successfully deploy the proceeds therefrom; DIV will generate sufficient cash flows from its royalties to service its debt and pay dividends to shareholders; the business and economic conditions affecting DIV and its royalty partners will continue substantially in the ordinary course, including without limitation with respect to general industry conditions, general levels of economic activity and regulations. These assumptions, although considered reasonable by management at the time of preparation, may prove to be incorrect.

    All of the forward-looking information in this news release is qualified by these cautionary statements and other cautionary statements or factors contained herein, and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the expected consequences to, or effects on, DIV. The forward-looking information included in this news release is presented as of the date of this news release and DIV assumes no obligation to publicly update or revise such information to reflect new events or circumstances, except as may be required by applicable law.

    THE TORONTO STOCK EXCHANGE HAS NOT REVIEWED AND DOES NOT ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ADEQUACY OR THE ACCURACY OF THIS RELEASE.

    Additional Information

    Additional information relating to the Corporation and other public filings, is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

    Contact:
    Sean Morrison, Chief Executive Officer and Director
    Diversified Royalty Corp.
    (236) 521-8470

    Greg Gutmanis, President and Chief Financial Officer
    Diversified Royalty Corp.
    (236) 521-8471

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Climate disasters are pushing people into homelessness – but there’s a lot we can do about it

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Timothy Heffernan, Lecturer in Anthropology, Australian National University

    Almost half of all Australian properties are at risk of bushfire, while 17,500 face risk of coastal erosion. By 2030, more than 3 million will face riverine flood risk.

    Meanwhile, housing demand continues to outpace supply. With climate-related disasters projected to increase in frequency and severity, the task of ensuring safe and adequate housing for all Australians remains a challenge.

    In other words, disasters are worsening the housing shortage, rendering more people at risk of homelessness.

    There is growing consensus in the homelessness and emergency management sectors that Australia needs a national policy response.

    We must ensure secure and safe housing options are a disaster planning priority.

    Like ‘living a disaster every day’

    Climate disasters displace 22,261 Australians on average each year. People with the lowest incomes make up 80% of this. The very poorest 3%, despite being small, make up 14% of displaced households.

    Australia is not alone. Globally, 70% of internal displacement in 2024 resulted from disasters, often disproportionately affecting low socioeconomic areas.

    Loss of housing affects everything from a person’s health and employment to education and relationships. One person who’d experienced disaster-related housing loss said it was like

    living a disaster every day, but without the assistance and support given to most disaster survivors.

    Renters, rough sleepers and people living in unattached dwellings are most vulnerable.

    Slipping through the cracks

    The catastrophic Northern Rivers floods in 2022 provide an instructive example.

    The floods rendered over 3,500 homes uninhabitable and more than 8,000 were damaged. Over 1,400 people were displaced and offered emergency accommodation by the New South Wales government.

    The total number of people experiencing homelessness post-floods remains unclear. This is due to existing overcrowding and because people left the area or became uncontactable.

    Recent research colleagues and I conducted with homeowners and renters, commissioned by the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute, examined 17 people’s experiences of securing shelter after disaster.

    In Lismore, a key barrier was poor communication and increased competition for rental housing. One person told us:

    The real estate basically dropped the ball after a month. I had to chase them up, and the return of my bond and all that. […] I applied for ten different properties and never heard back. […] I ended up sourcing my own accommodation, a camper trailer, and camped out at the local showgrounds.

    For renters, the disaster couldn’t have come at a worse time. A preexisting rental crisis across the region meant the private market was already tight.

    Homeowners, by contrast, were able to use insurance to cover transitional housing costs or were eligible for several funding sources to repair properties. This highlights a policy emphasis toward homeowners.

    In this context, people can slip through the cracks, increasing the risk of homelessness.

    Post-disaster housing can compound vulnerability

    Temporary shelters – such as crisis shelters, motels, short-term rentals, pods, cabins and caravans – can be a stop-gap against the risk of homelessness after disaster. However, temporary shelter comes with trade-offs and downsides.

    Crisis and commercial options can be damaged during disaster, limiting their use. Pod villages provide mass shelter but are costly, slow to deliver, and there’s often no meaningful plan for people to transition out of them.

    Some 18 months after the 2022 Northern Rivers floods, 1,021 people were still living in temporary pod villages and 257 people remained in caravans.

    Rent is not usually charged. When relied on beyond the immediate term, this can compound vulnerability by creating gaps in people’s rental history.

    A NSW government audit found 724 households were on the waitlist for temporary housing a year after the floods, though this list was rarely updated.

    Overall, relatively few households have secured long-term housing solutions. This year, four pod villages will be demobilised amid the region’s ongoing rental crisis.

    This comes at a time when Australia is facing a shortfall of 640,000 social and affordable homes.

    Around 110,000 requests for homelessness services go unassisted annually.

    A national framework is needed

    In 2024, a national symposium, convened by the Australian Red Cross, Homelessness Australia and UNSW Sydney’s HowWeSurvive initiative, brought together 125 professionals from the housing, homelessness, emergency management, government and academic sectors.

    The report, released in June 2025, called for a national framework focused on disasters, housing and homelessness.

    Several policies deal separately with these areas at the Commonwealth, state and territory levels. A unified approach, however, would reposition shelter after disaster from a stop-gap to a central part of disaster planning.

    The aim is to strengthen housing options before a natural hazard occurs and prevent disaster-related homelessness.

    Australia needs a coordinated strategy and taskforce to align housing, homelessness, and disaster policies and programs. Homelessness planning should be part of disaster planning, and vice versa, to ensure housing type and tenure does not place people at risk of homelessness when disaster strikes.

    This requires going beyond just linking displaced households with crisis services.

    We must plan for each stage of housing before and after a disaster and anticipate diverse needs, especially for renters and those at risk of homelessness.

    Responses should be trauma-informed and able to adapt individual experiences.

    Now is the time to act – before the next disaster strikes.

    This article was developed with the Australian Red Cross and Homelessness Australia, co-facilitators of the Housing, Homelessness and Disasters National Symposium held in Melbourne in 2024. The symposium was supported by National Shelter and the Community Housing Industry Association, and event funding was provided by the Lord Mayor’s Charitable Foundation.

    Timothy Heffernan has received funding from the Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI), the NSW government and the National Health and Medical Research Council. He is an Honorary Research Fellow at HowWeSurvive, UNSW Sydney.

    – ref. Climate disasters are pushing people into homelessness – but there’s a lot we can do about it – https://theconversation.com/climate-disasters-are-pushing-people-into-homelessness-but-theres-a-lot-we-can-do-about-it-259149

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Local News – Volunteers celebrated at Wellington Airport Regional Community Awards – Porirua

    Source: Porirua City Council 

    Ahu Charitable Trust (Pukerua Bay Hub) was crowned supreme Porirua winners at the 2025 Wellington Airport Regional Community Awards last night.
    The event, held at Pātaka Art + Museum, highlighted outstanding volunteers and organisations making a difference in Porirua with their dedication and passion.
    Category winners were:
    Education and Child/Youth Development – 41 (City of Porirua) Squadron Air Training Corp (runner-up Holy Family Parish Youth Ministry)
    Health and Wellbeing – Foundation for Equity and Research NZ (runner-up Waitangirua Market)
    Arts and Culture – Ahu Charitable Trust (Pukerua Bay Hub) (runner-up Malaga Sā)
    Sport and Leisure – Plimmerton Boating Club (runner-up Porirua City Aquatics Learn to Swim programme)
    Heritage and Environment – Whitireia Park Restoration Group (runner-up Tū Matau Ora)
    Rising Star – Heavy Hitterz (runner-up O Le Nu’u Trust)
    Supreme Award – Ahu Charitable Trust (Pukerua Bay Hub)
    Ahu Charitable Trust (Pukerua Bay Hub) was established in 2017 by locals wanting to bring the community together to share skills and build resilience. Last winter, their innovative ‘Pop-Up Parlour’ transformed St Marks Church into a central hub with 48 diverse events held over a five-week period.
    Porirua City Council’s General Manager Community & Partnerships, Reuben Friend, said the awards are a chance to show off how diverse groups are making our a better place for us to live.
    “Everyone nominated demonstrates their love for Porirua and its people through their ongoing commitment – they show innovation, effectiveness, perseverance, impact and activity within our communities,” he said.
    Wellington Airport chief executive Matt Clarke said the airport was proud to celebrate the outstanding work of community groups in Porirua over the previous 12 months.
    “These groups deserve recognition for the amazing and selfless work they do in the community. Congratulations to all nominees and winners, and best of luck for the Regional Community Awards finals later this year.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Cutting-edge personalised treatments, made while you wait, will deliver specialised care to patients more quickly

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    Cutting-edge personalised treatments, made while you wait, will deliver specialised care to patients more quickly

    New regulations effective today will make it faster and easier for cutting-edge cancer treatments and personalised gene therapies to be made right where patients are treated.

    Patients will receive faster access to life-saving, personalised treatments made at their hospital, clinic or near their homes instead of waiting weeks for therapies manufactured hundreds of miles away, under new UK legislation that comes into force today (23 July).

    This world first regulations, introduced by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), allows breakthrough personalised medicines to be prepared in small or individual batches – bringing care closer to the patient.

    A cancer patient could now have their immune cells collected, modified to fight their specific cancer, and returned within days rather than months. A child with a rare genetic disorder could receive a freshly prepared therapy with only minutes of shelf life, made and given on the spot.

    The change will cut waiting times where every hour counts, help free up NHS beds, and improve access to innovative therapies that were previously out of reach.

    Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting said:

    “This world-first legislation is a game-changer for patients. Cancer treatments tailored in days, not months. Life-saving therapies made at your bedside, not hundreds of miles away.

    “Our Plan for Change promised to build an NHS fit for the future. Today we’re delivering on that pledge by bringing cutting-edge care directly to patients when they need it most.

    “We are turning around our NHS with waiting lists at their lowest for two years – this type of therapy means patients can be treated and return home more quickly.”

    Science Minister Lord Vallance said:

    “This world-first framework gives the NHS and innovators a clear, safe way to bring advanced treatments from the lab to the patient’s bedside. It’s a powerful example of how smart regulation can help more patients benefit from the best of British science.

    “We’re determined to clear the path for more health innovation of this sort. Our recently-published Life Sciences Sector Plan sets out our clear vision to do just that – with a view to unlocking growth, investment, and delivering a stronger, prevention-focused healthcare system.”

    MHRA Chief Executive Lawrence Tallon said:

    “Patients will now receive highly personalised treatments more quickly and nearer to their bedside, with the same rigorous standards as all medicines.

    “This is especially important where every hour matters, or where a treatment is so specific it simply can’t be made in advance.

    “It’s a landmark moment that opens the door to a future where highly personalised treatment – made for one person, in one place, at one time – becomes part of routine care.

    “The UK is leading the world in this next generation of medical innovation, and as the UK regulator for medicines and medical devices, we’re determined to play our role in providing the supportive regulatory framework to help our health partners and medicines innovators bring can bring these new treatments to patients.”

    From months to days

    Until now, personalised treatments such as CAR-T cancer therapy had to be sent to specialised manufacturing facilities often far away, causing long delays. In some cases, patients became too unwell to receive the therapy in time, or the medicine’s short shelf life meant it couldn’t be delivered at all.

    Hospitals were only able to offer these treatments through complicated, one-off arrangements, creating uncertainty for patients and doctors about whether treatment could go ahead.

    From today, hospitals, ambulances and local care settings in the UK have a pathway to carry out the final manufacturing steps for these personalised or time-sensitive treatments on-site, using clear, regulated protocols. This mirrors how chemotherapy or antibiotics are prepared locally, but with the same strict safeguards for more advanced therapies. A central control site will provide detailed instructions and oversight, while hospitals complete the process closer to the patient.

    Supporting care closer to home

    The legislation also supports the use of mobile manufacturing units – offering a safer alternative for patients too unwell to travel, or whose weakened immune systems mean hospital visits carry extra risk.

    This change enables care to be delivered where it’s most appropriate, including community settings or even at home, supporting the NHS ambition, as set out in the 10 Year Health Plan for England, to expand ‘hospital at home’ models such as virtual wards.

    Backed by law – and leading the world

    The legislation, known as The Human Medicines (Amendment) (Modular Manufacture and Point of Care) Regulations 2025, makes the UK the first country in the world to introduce a dedicated legal framework for medicines made at the point of care.

    Following strong support during the public consultation, the framework covers a broad range of innovative products, including cell and gene therapies, tissue-engineered treatments, 3D printed products, blood products, and medicinal gases.

    To support implementation, the MHRA published detailed guidance earlier this year and has worked closely with other UK regulators, the NHS, industry, academics and healthcare professionals to ensure clarity around how the legislation applies in practice. Today, the MHRA has added information on how to apply for a decentralised manufacture designation. Companies can also access MHRA scientific advice at any stage of development.

    The move strengthens the UK’s leadership in safe, decentralised manufacturing and is expected to boost research, trials and patient access to cutting-edge treatments. The MHRA is also working internationally to support similar changes in other countries, recently being centrally involved in the first global workshop on point-of-care manufacturing, through the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA).

    Cell and Gene Therapy Catapult Chief Executive Matthew Durdy said:

    “This change demonstrates how the MHRA is leading in the UK’s commitment to being at the forefront of modern healthcare, innovation and regulation. The MHRA has recognised that some practices are better with more flexibility, and that in a technology enabled world which allows better training, information and communication, flexibility can be enabled without compromising safety.

    “This is not just a step forward for innovative medicines such as cell and gene therapies, it is a step towards enabling truly personalised medicine. We applaud this change introduced by the MHRA and look forward to a future where more patients can receive therapeutics tailored to their needs, quickly, cost-effectively and sustainably.”

    NHS England National Director for Specialised Commissioning John Stewart said:

    “The NHS in England was the first health system in Europe to adopt personalised cancer medicines and has since built a strong track record as an early leader in the use of potentially curative gene therapies.

    “The advanced treatments of today, will become the everyday healthcare of tomorrow, and forward-thinking regulatory changes like this will help enable the NHS to evolve patient care to deliver complex treatments to more people, in more places.”  

    Notes to editors 

    1. The regulations will take effect across the UK from 23 July 2025. For more information, visit The Human Medicines (Amendment) (Modular Manufacture and Point of Care) Regulations 2025
    2. Supporting guidance and updates can be accessed at Decentralised manufacture hub – GOV.UK
    3. Products manufactured at the point of care are eligible for support through the MHRA ILAP pathway, which is in place to accelerate time to market and facilitate patient access.
    4. Government response to consultation on proposals to support the regulation of medicines manufactured at the Point of Care – GOV.UK
    5. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is responsible for regulating all medicines and medical devices in the UK by ensuring they work and are acceptably safe. All our work is underpinned by robust and fact-based judgements to ensure that the benefits justify any risks. 
    6. The MHRA is an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care. 
    7. For media enquiries, please contact the newscentre@mhra.gov.uk, or call on 020 3080 7651.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: expert reaction to observational study of GLP-1 receptor agonists and metformin in people with type 2 diabetes and risk of dementia

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    July 22, 2025

    An observational study published in BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care looks at GLP-1 drugs vs metformin and the risk of dementia in people with type 2 diabetes. 

    Dr Richard Oakley, Associate Director of Research and Innovation, Alzheimer’s Society, said: 

    “Dementia is the UK’s biggest killer and one in three people born today will go onto to develop the condition. So, it’s exciting to see more research which shows how drugs currently being used for diabetes and weight loss – which are relatively cheap and easy to use – may also reduce the risk of dementia. 

    “This study found that GLP1RAs may significantly reduce some people’s risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease, and more so than those taking a second diabetes drug called metformin. 

    “However, they’re not a silver bullet in the fight against dementia and this study had several limitations that mean we mustn’t rush to conclusions about the effectiveness of these drugs – clinical trials will tell us more. 

    “These treatments didn’t reduce people’s risk of developing other types of dementia, such as vascular dementia, and there was a significant difference in risk reduction depending on patients’ ethnicity, with White patients much more likely to have a reduced risk than other racial groups. 

    “The study was retrospective, meaning we don’t know participants’ long-term outcomes and how many went on to develop dementia beyond the lifespan of the study. We need more dedicated research to understand whether these drugs could be used to tackle dementia while also finding therapies that benefit people from all backgrounds. 

    “We’re not at the finish line by any means, but we’re heading in the right direction.” 

    Dr Sheona Scales, Director of Research, Alzheimer’s Research UK, said:

    “Research shows that nearly half (45 %) of dementia cases are linked to 14 risk factors, including type 2 diabetes. Recent studies suggest that some commonly prescribed diabetes medicines could help reduce the risk of dementia, but it’s still unclear which treatments are most effective. This new study adds to a growing body of evidence that GLP-1 medicines may play a role in lowering dementia risk.

    “This is the first major study to compare the effect of two common diabetes treatments — GLP-1 medicines and metformin — on dementia risk, using health records from more than 174,000 people. The findings suggest that people with type 2 diabetes taking GLP-1 medicines had a lower risk of developing dementia than those taking metformin.

    “Using real health records helps us understand how these medicines might work in everyday life — not just in clinical trials. And the findings suggest a lower dementia risk in those taking GLP-1 medicines, but the study cannot tell us how these medicines affect the underlying biology that causes dementia. People with type 2 diabetes often have other health conditions, like high blood pressure or high cholesterol, which are also linked to dementia — so it’s hard to untangle what role these factors might have had on dementia risk in this study.

    “The two-year follow-up period may also be too short to tell what longer-term benefits these medicines may have on the brain. To build on the findings, we will need longer studies and clinical trials to look in detail at how different medicines may affect the brain and risk of developing dementia, in people with and without diabetes.

    “Anyone who has concerns or questions about their diabetes medications, brain health or dementia risk should speak to their GP.”

    Prof Patrick Kehoe, Gestetner Professor of Translational Dementia Research and Director of the Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research, University of Bristol, said:

    “This retrospective observational study gives more credence to the growing narrative about Alzheimer’s disease, as opposed to Vascular dementias, having a strong insulin resistance component, which happens in ageing but is thought to be more pronounced in Alzheimer’s disease.

    “But, as the authors acknowledge, it would need a formal trial to prove. There are some other considerations to note from this study. Most of the GLP-1 drugs studied in this group, of which there are several, remain largely under patent protection. This means they are more expensive and therefore not as widely available in some countries, such as those with public health care systems – compared to insurance-funded healthcare provision. So there is a possibility the favourable findings for this group of drugs may relate to the people who take them having some additional socioeconomic advantages, including diet, greater or more frequent access to exercise, and maybe higher or longer levels of education, that have also offered some other forms of protection.

    “A properly designed blinded randomised clinical trial could help address and counter these potential sources of bias, allowing a better head-to-head comparison. Such a trial would also enable the monitoring of drug side effects, which is also important. However, such robust research would be prohibitively costly and time-consuming, particularly when some of the GLP-1 drugs are already off patent or soon to be, making them less attractive to investigate in the commercial sector, and so it would fall to ever-tightening publicly-funded schemes, such as UKRI or Research Charities in the UK to fund them.

    “It may be the case that over time, as more GLP-1 drugs fall off patent and become available in cheaper forms, doctors will prescribe more of them because they have more choice and additional evidence might have become available. They are fortunate to have several choices to treat the diabetes which would be the more immediate concern. Further evidence of benefit may emerge in a way similar to what seems to have happened when there was a huge and successful effort to improve the detection and treatment of high blood pressure, in other words hypertension, and so with the increased levels of prescribing those drugs it possibly provided some protection as well as some slowing. Accordingly, reduced rates of dementia were observed, as reported in a similar observational study reported in 2016.

    “In the absence of clear findings in relation to these drugs, people still have some choices. Continued efforts to maintain a healthy diet and lifestyle, as well as body weight, will help not only to lessen the effects of diabetes but also improve cardiovascular health, all of which can do no harm to quality of life – and may offer additional protection against dementia.”

    Dr Martin Whyte, Associate Professor in Metabolic Medicine, University of Surrey, said: 

    “Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is known to increase the risk of cognitive impairment and dementia. Two of the most commonly prescribed medications for T2D are metformin and GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 drugs), which are primarily used to control blood sugar. However, GLP-1 drugs are known to have additional effects beyond glucose lowering, including actions on inflammation and the central nervous system.

    “There has been growing interest in whether GLP-1 drugs might help reduce the risk of dementia. The REWIND trial, which tested dulaglutide (a GLP-1 drug) versus placebo in people with T2D, reported a 14% reduction in the risk of significant cognitive decline, although it was not specifically designed to assess dementia risk.

    “In a new observational study by Sun and colleagues, based on routinely collected healthcare data, GLP-1 use was associated with a 10% lower risk of developing dementia (of all types) compared to metformin use. Since GLP-1 receptors are present throughout the brain, it is possible that the effect is direct; or it may be indirect—for example, via reductions in systemic inflammation or metabolic risk factors.

    “However, this was an observational study, which means it is subject to bias and confounding. Notably, the authors did not provide detailed information about the characteristics of patients in each group, either before or after statistical matching, and treatment duration for either GLP-1 drugs or metformin was not reported. These limitations make it difficult to draw firm conclusions, but the findings add to the growing interest in the potential cognitive benefits of GLP-1 drugs. A number of prospective randomised controlled trials are ongoing, to examine whether GLP-1 drugs can reduce the risk of dementia.”

    Dr Craig Beall, Senior Lecturer, University of Exeter, said:

    “It is important to note that people with diabetes have a 60% increased risk of dementia. Earlier separate studies using health records have shown that both metformin and GLP-1RAs are associated with reduced dementia risk. This study puts the two drugs head-to-head and shows that GLP-1RAs seem to be associated with a superior risk reduction for dementia.”

    “However, whether these drugs only reduce the diabetes related dementia risk is not yet clear. Whether people without diabetes could benefit is still unknown. What we need to determine this are randomised control trials and there are three large randomised control trials currently running. In these trials people without diabetes but with mild cognitive impairment, are given metformin or GLP-1RAs, and metformin in Alzheimer’s disease trial and EVOKE and EVOKE+ trials. Results are not expected until 2026. These studies will give the best evidence of whether these two drugs can slow progression or prevent full blown dementia from becoming established.”

     

    Prof Tara Spires-Jones, Director of the Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences at the University of Edinburgh, Group Leader in the UK Dementia Research Institute, and Past President of the British Neuroscience Association said:

    “This study adds to a series of recent papers indicating GLP-1 receptor agonists likely protect people with diabetes from developing dementia.  Lin and colleagues looked at medical records from over 170,000 people with diabetes, half of whom were treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists and half treated with metformin, and the GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment was associated with 10% lower risk of dementia than metformin over a four year follow up time.  As the authors point out, this type of study cannot prove that the GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment directly lowered dementia risk.  The study also has limitations of relatively short follow up time of 4 years and the types of dementia diagnosed rely on physician diagnosis and were not confirmed with brain scans or other biomarkers, meaning the data on which types of dementia were prevented are not very robust.  Overall, this study and many others coming out recently indicate GLP-1 receptor agonists likely lower dementia risk in people with diabetes.  Further work is needed including randomised clinical trials to confirm these drugs are protective in people with type 2 diabetes and whether these drugs will be protective in people who do not have type 2 diabetes.”

    ‘Evaluating GLP-1 receptor agonists versus metformin as first-line therapy for reducing dementia risk in type 2 diabetes’ by Mingyang Sun et al. was published in BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care at 23:30 UK time on Tuesday 22nd July. 

    DOI: doi:10.1136/ bmjdrc-2025-004902

    Declared interests

    Prof Patrick Kehoe: No interests to declare.

    Dr Martin Whyte: “I am a site PI at King’s College Hospital for the FOCUS study which is examining the effect of semaglutide on retinopathy. I am not a grant holder for this.” 

    Dr Craig Beall: CB has previously collaborated with Rigel Pharmacuticals Inc. (CA, USA) on a JDRF/Breakthrough T1D-funded research project.

    CB is currently studying the effects of both drug types brain cells, in the context of diabetes.

    Prof Tara Spires-Jones: I have no conflicts with this study but have received payments for consulting, scientific talks, or collaborative research over the past 10 years from AbbVie, Sanofi, Merck, Scottish Brain Sciences, Jay Therapeutics, Cognition Therapeutics, Ono, and Eisai. I am also Charity trustee for the British Neuroscience Association and the Guarantors of Brain and serve as scientific advisor to several charities and non-profit institutions.

    Dr Richard Oakley: None

    Dr Sheona Scales: None

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: ICYMI: GOP Senator Reveals the ‘Dirty’ Secret to Trump’s Make America Healthy Again Movement

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Kansas Roger Marshall

    Washington – U.S. Senator Roger Marshall, M.D. (R-Kansas) sat down with Fox News Digital to discuss the nearly 30 bipartisan bills he has proposed for his Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) legislative package. Senator Marshall is the chairman of the MAHA Caucus.
    Read the full article HERE or below:
    GOP Senator Reveals the ‘Dirty’ Secret to Trump’s Make America Healthy Again Movement
    Alex Miller
    Fox News Digital
    July 18, 2025
    For one lawmaker, the path to making Americans healthier starts in the dirt.
    Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., has styled himself as an early adopter of the Make America Healthy Again movement, a political slogan born on the 2024 campaign trail that has since seen major companies tweak their products to nix artificial additives.
    But Marshall sees the initiative, commonly known as MAHA, as one that can start sooner than switching the oil in deep friers or swapping out high-fructose corn syrup for cane sugar in soda.
    He has his own four pillars of MAHA, which include dialing up efficiency in agriculture; healthier, more nutrient-rich food; affordable access to primary care healthcare; and addressing mental health challenges among young people.
    But it all starts below the surface with soil health.
    “Soil is a dirty topic, you know, pun intended,” Marshall told Fox News Digital in an interview.
    MAHA diehards and farmers are, at a surface level, at odds with one another, he said. For example, returning to an entirely organic food production process devoid of fertilizers would create healthier food, but also crank up the costs on consumers and strain farmland.
    Earlier in the week, Marshall held a roundtable with Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to try and bridge that gap.
    “Soil health seems to be the common ground,” he said. “So healthy soil meets healthy food meets healthy people. Rather than MAHA telling these farmers what you can and can’t do, we wanted to say, ‘What’s our goal here?’ If we have the same goals, then we’re going to figure this out. Well, the goal is healthy soil.”
    Getting those two in a room together, along with experts on regenerative agriculture, which is a more holistic approach to farming that targets soil health by restoring and enhancing ecosystems, is just a part of his plan.
    He also intends to drop a massive package of bills that is divided up into categories that echo his four pillars, including legislation geared toward health care, mental health, nutrition and agriculture.
    Among the nearly 30 bills and amendments in the package is one Marshall is particularly keen to see codified. The Plant Biostimulant Act would spur usage of organisms that can be placed into the soil and that latch onto the roots of plants that absorb nitrates and more water, he said.
    The bill ties in directly with his passion for regenerative agriculture, which uses fewer fertilizers, water and other status-quo farming techniques to produce healthier foods on more sustainable farmland, which, in turn, would yield a cheaper, more nutritious diet for Americans.
    “It’s growing more with less,” he said.
    Among the various, bipartisan pieces of legislation from both chambers are bills that would push mobile cancer screenings with grant funding, add mental health warnings for kids scrolling through social media, require more transparency in food ingredients, expansion of employer healthcare coverage for chronic diseases, and measures that would allow bleeding edge soil health technology and processes to be considered conservation practices and eligible for Farm Bill funding, among others.
    Most bills need to get 60 votes to pass in the Senate, Marshall noted, and that led to a desire to incorporate as many bipartisan measures in the package as possible. It’s also a topic that, in spite of the political polarization in Washington, “unites us, rather than divides us.”
    Still, with President Donald Trump in office, he sees the chance for the measures to pass as a kind of now or never moment.
    “We’re seeing a time in our lives where the incidence of cancer, the age of cancer, is growing younger and younger, the age of Alzheimer’s onset is growing younger and younger, and we believe it’s an inflammatory reaction to the food that we’re eating that leads to all that,” he said.
    “We think heart disease, hypertension, is really an inflammatory reaction… to the food we’re eating and the constantly high sugar levels in our blood system,” he continued. “So absolutely, I think, seize the moment. This is it.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Noting Almost 3 Billion People Lack Safe Place to Live, Deputy Secretary-General Urges Investment in Adequate Housing as Both Development, Peace Infrastructure

    Source: United Nations General Assembly and Security Council

    Following are UN Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed’s remarks, as prepared for delivery, at the joint Economic and Social Council and the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) high-level dialogue on adequate housing, today:

    It is a privilege to join you today for this important dialogue.  I thank the President of the Economic and Social Council and UN-Habitat for convening us at such a critical moment.

    Let me begin with a simple question:  What did it take for us to be here today?  We woke up somewhere safe.  We had an address where documents could reach us, where our families knew to find us.  We had a place to eat a meal, charge our phones and prepare for this day.  For almost 3 billion people on our planet, none of that is guaranteed.

    This is why today’s dialogue — at this critical moment during the High-Level Political Forum — matters so urgently.  Housing is not simply about a roof over one’s head.  It is a fundamental human right and the foundation upon which peace itself rests.  Sustainable development and sustainable peace are inseparable.

    Today, in an increasingly urbanized world, almost 3 billion people still live in inadequate conditions, in informal settlements, overcrowded housing or with no shelter at all.  Among them are more than 120 million refugees and internally displaced persons — families torn from their homes by conflict, persecution and violence.

    When homes are destroyed, when families are forced to flee, when communities are uprooted, we witness how housing becomes both a casualty and weapon of war.  In Gaza, in Ukraine, in Sudan, in Yemen, in Myanmar and beyond, we have seen this time and again.

    There is no safe housing in rubble, and without shelter, we lose the very basis of social cohesion and stability that makes peace possible.  This crisis touches every Sustainable Development Goal we’ve committed to achieving by 2030.

    We often say that home is where the heart is.  Our work on housing sits at the very heart of the Sustainable Development Goals, and when we secure adequate housing for all, we nurture the conditions where every other goal can flourish.

    We know that when people have access to safe, adequate, and affordable housing, children perform better in school.  Workers are more productive.  Health outcomes improve dramatically.  Decent work becomes accessible.  Communities become more resilient to the forces that fuel conflict and division.  And while adequate housing cannot eliminate gender-based violence within the home, it reduces women and girls’ exposure to violence in public spaces.

    So, the reality is that the ambition of the 2030 Agenda to leave no one behind begins with something as fundamental as a safe place to call home. By 2030, 60 per cent of the world’s population will live in cities, rising to nearly 70 per cent by 2050.

    We have the tools and the commitment to grow cities, not slums, guided by the New Urban Agenda’s call for planned, inclusive urbanization that ensures housing, services and dignity for all.  Success or failure to deliver on our commitments will depend on our ability to act urgently and work together.

    At the Financing for Development Forum, Member States rightly called for bold reforms and investments to strengthen the social contract.  That must include housing, not as a stand-alone project, but as a driver of inclusive development.

    The Pact for the Future reaffirmed the 2030 Agenda and gave us a mandate to make multilateralism deliver in the lives of people, in the neighbourhoods where they live.  It also gave us a mandate to prevent conflict and sustain peace — and housing sits at the intersection of both.

    Later this year, the Second World Social Summit offers us an opportunity to reaffirm that housing is critical for social protection, decent work, access to services, and essential to building a just and cohesive society.  It is also an opportunity to recognize housing as a pillar of conflict prevention and peacebuilding.

    As Chair of the UN Sustainable Development Group, I see how country teams are working every day with governments, civil society and local and regional governments to advance these goals.

    But we need to do more.  Concretely, that means aligning political commitment and financing with the urgency and scale of the challenge.  It means investing in adequate housing, not just as development infrastructure, but peace infrastructure.

    We also need to bring to the centre those who are too often pushed to the margins:  women, young people, older persons, persons with disabilities, Indigenous Peoples, displaced populations and people living in homelessness.

    Their voices and experiences must inform the policies and solutions because they know what works, what’s missing, and they can inform the solutions we need to scale.  They also know intimately the connections between displacement, insecurity and conflict. Their involvement is the best measure of our commitment to equity, dignity and human rights.

    The first place where opportunity begins or where it is denied is not an office building or a school – it’s a home.  Together, let’s deliver not only shelter, but lasting solutions that offer security and a path to prosperity.  Not only four walls and a roof, but the opportunity to live in dignity.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: ‘We knocked her out with some gummies:’ trafficker sent to prison for conspiring to smuggle toddler from Mexico

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    LAREDO, Texas – A 23-year-old Laredo woman has been ordered to prison for her role in an unaccompanied minor smuggling ring, announced U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei.

    Vanessa Valadez pleaded guilty Sept. 20, 2024, admitting she smuggled a child into the United States for financial gain.

    U.S. District Judge Keith P. Ellison has now ordered her to serve 18 months in federal prison to be immediately followed by three years of supervised release.

    “Those that choose to engage in the human trafficking business are not good people. They aren’t motivated by altruism or sympathy. They are paid to traffic in human beings, and they treat people they smuggle as nothing more than cargo,” said Ganjei. “The Southern District of Texas will not rest until all such smuggling rings—particularly those that deal in children—are completely eradicated.”

    “The sentencing of this individual underscores the serious consequences for those who exploit and endanger vulnerable populations, especially children,” said Immigration and Customs Enforcement – Homeland Security Investigations (ICE-HSI) San Antonio Special Agent in Charge Craig S. Larrabee. “Drugging children to facilitate human smuggling is not only criminal it’s inhumane. HSI is committed to identifying and dismantling the criminal networks behind these horrific acts and ensuring those responsible are brought to justice.”

    From August to September 2023, Valadez and other family members operated a child smuggling ring working to bring young illegal minors from Nuevo Laredo, Mexico, into the United States. All the children were under the age of five. 

    On the night of Sept. 19, 2023, members of the smuggling ring retrieved a young girl from a stash house which the organization members operated. The co-conspirators smuggled the girl across the border and delivered her to Valadez in downtown Laredo. Co-conspirators then took the child further into the United States and delivered her to unknown people.

    Two days later, the ring attempted to transport another young girl. However, law enforcement intercepted them following a routine border inspection at the Juarez Lincoln Bridge in Laredo. To carry out their scheme, co-conspirators had sedated the girl with melatonin gummies and used an unlawfully obtained birth certificate to deceive authorities into believing the girl was a family member. 

    The investigation revealed the smuggling ring had attempted to similarly transport at least four girls into the United States, three of whom remain unidentified and their whereabouts are unknown. Members of the smuggling ring obtained birth certificates of U.S. citizen children to pose as a family unit at ports of entry to the United States. At times, organization members used melatonin gummies to sedate at least one child to ensure a successful smuggling attempt. 

    One text message uncovered in the investigation showed an image depicting an unconscious child and a caption, “La noquiamos con unas gomitas,” translated in English as “we knocked her out with some gummies.”

    Co-conspirators Ana Laura Bryand, 47, Dallas; her niece Kayla Marie Bryand, 20, Jose Eduardo Bryand, 43, and Nancy Guadalupe Bryand, 44, all of Laredo; and Lizeth Esmeralda Bryand Arredondo, 32, Mexico, previously pleaded guilty and have all already been sentenced to federal prison.

    ICE-HSI conducted the investigation with Customs and Border Protection’s Office of Field Operations and assistance from Border Patrol, Laredo Police Department, Department of Health and Human Services – Office of the Inspector General and FBI. Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Makens and former Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Terence A. Check Jr. prosecuted the case. 

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: iDox.ai Announces Launch of iDox.ai Privacy Scout: AI-Powered Solution That Goes Beyond DLP to Protect Sensitive Data in Real Time

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Fremont, California , July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — iDox.ai, a U.S.-based provider of AI-powered document compliance tools, announces the launch of iDox.ai Privacy Scout, an advanced Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solution engineered to detect and protect sensitive information in real time, particularly in environments deploying Generative AI.

    iDox.ai

    As organizations adopt artificial intelligence across industries, new challenges emerge in safeguarding Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Protected Health Information (PHI), and other confidential data. Privacy Scout responds to these challenges by offering an automated solution that monitors and intercepts sensitive information before it can be exposed or misused.

    Importantly, iDox.ai Privacy Scout promotes the secure sharing of documents with AI tools while protecting the PII within them. Unlike traditional DLP tools, iDox.ai Privacy Scout doesn’t treat next-generation AI as a threat—it enables its safe use. This is a key differentiator that empowers organizations to embrace AI innovation without compromising on privacy.

    Key capabilities of iDox.ai Privacy Scout include:

    • Real-Time Detection and Redaction: The system applies intelligent AI models to scan documents and files for sensitive content. It instantly redacts or restricts access to flagged data, preventing unauthorized disclosure.
    • Industry-Wide Compatibility:  Built for seamless deployment across healthcare, finance, legal, corporate IT, and government sectors, iDox.ai Privacy Scout integrates effortlessly into existing workflows while strengthening your organization’s data protection framework. The application installs directly on employees’ devices, ensuring immediate protection at the endpoint. For enterprise environments, it includes a centralized management console for streamlined oversight, policy enforcement, and user activity monitoring.
    • Compliance Support: iDox.ai Privacy Scout helps organizations meet global data protection regulations such as HIPAA and GDPR, making it a strategic asset for businesses aiming to maintain data security and regulatory compliance.

    “With the rise of Generative AI, businesses face new risks related to data privacy and unintentional information leaks,” said Jeremy Wei, CEO of iDox.ai. “iDox.ai Privacy Scout offers a reliable DLP solution that allows organizations to stay compliant while leveraging the advantages of AI.”

    iDox.ai Privacy Scout joins iDox.ai’s suite of AI-driven compliance products, which includes tools for redaction, document comparison, and regulatory reporting. Together, these solutions help clients maintain secure information practices and implement effective Data Loss Prevention strategies.

    The launch of iDox.ai Privacy Scout reinforces iDox.ai’s mission to develop technology that addresses evolving compliance challenges and strengthens trust in digital operations.

    Organizations seeking early access or additional product details can visit: https://www.idox.ai/products/privacy-scout

    About iDox.ai

    Headquartered in Fremont, California, iDox.ai specializes in artificial intelligence tools for document management, redaction, and regulatory compliance. The company supports public and private sector organizations in securing data, reducing manual risk, and maintaining compliance in dynamic digital environments.

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Frost and Cherfilus-McCormick Reintroduce Bill to Prevent Radioactive Materials from Being Used to Build Roads – the “No Radioactive Roads Act”

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Maxwell Frost Florida (10th District)

    July 22, 2025

    Frost’s Bill Would Prevent Cancer-Causing Fertilizer Byproduct from Being Used in Road Construction

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, Congressman Maxwell Alejandro Frost (D-FL) and Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL) reintroduced the No Radioactive Roads Act, legislation to ensure the current Trump Administration or any future administration cannot allow for deadly, cancer-causing radioactive material, phosphogypsum (PG), to be used in road construction. Florida is the world’s largest PG producing area with 1 billion tons of PG stored in stacks, mainly in the Central Florida region. 

    The Biden-Harris Administration quickly reversed the first Trump Administration’s unscientific decision to allow PG in road construction in 2021. However, with Trump’s return to office, PG’s threat to people’s health is once again imminent. 

    In 2021, a tear at a PG stack facility allowed for millions of gallons of untreated wastewater to be released into Tampa Bay, devastating the clean waters of the bay and causing a red tide outbreak, killing millions of fish. Despite the environmental fallout, in 2023, Governor Ron DeSantis signed a bill into law to allow the cancer-causing material to be used in road construction. Most recently, ahead of the Trump Administration taking office, the Environmental Protection Agency authorized Mosaic’s pilot road project to use 1,200 tons of the hazardous material in Polk County, Florida. 

    Frost and Cherfilus-McCormick first introduced the bill in 2024. 

    “As Florida allows for PG to be used in our roads, endangering our workers, drivers, and entire communities, we need immediate federal action that puts public health over corporate profits,” said Congressman Maxwell Frost. “The science is abundantly clear—PG is a deadly, cancer-causing substance that harms our environment and puts lives at risk, and no administration should be able to permit its use without the highest safety standards. It’s unacceptable that the fertilizer industry is looking to offload toxic waste into our roads in order to boost their profits while leaders like DeSantis and Donald Trump enable it. The No Radioactive Roads Act puts our people, our planet, and our future over the profits of corporate polluters.”

    “Protecting the health and safety of our communities must be our top priority. Using radioactive materials like phosphogypsum in road construction endangers our families, harms our environment, and puts our future at risk,” said Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick. “The No Radioactive Roads Act is a crucial step in preventing communities from facing the long-term dangers of toxic exposure. I am proud to partner with Congressman Maxwell Frost on this legislation to protect the well-being of every Floridian.”

    “The EPA’s decision to weaken standards for phosphogypsum is both reckless and unfounded. We cannot allow the health and safety of our communities to be sacrificed for the financial interests of the fertilizer industry, which seeks to profit from incorporating this radioactive byproduct into our roads. The science is clear: exposure to phosphogypsum is directly linked to significantly increased cancer risk. We will not tolerate policies that endanger our residents and workers,” said Orange County Commissioner Kelly Martinez Semrad. “In Orange County, I am also introducing an accompanying resolution to prohibit the use of phosphogypsum in local roadway projects. Our stance is firm, and our message is clear: I fully support Congressman Frost’s bill on behalf of the people of our district, the state of Florida, and communities across the country.”

    The No Radioactive Roads Act has been endorsed by the League of Conservation Voters, Center for Biological Diversity, Food & Water Watch, Surfrider Foundation, and the Save Split Oak Campaign.

    “Representative Frost’s No Radioactive Roads Act will help protect the health and safety of communities as the Trump administration continues to roll back protections from toxic pollutants. Constructing roads with radioactive, cancer-causing phosphogypsum can harm workers, drivers, and nearby families who are already most impacted by environmental injustice and the climate crisis. We will continue to fight alongside our climate champions in Congress like Representative Frost to pass legislation to protect the health of our communities, our air and water, and our future generations,” said Madeleine Foote, Healthy Communities Program Director for League of Conservation Voters.

    “The EPA made it clear decades ago that radioactive phosphogypsum has no place in our roads,” said J.W. Glass, EPA policy specialist at the Center for Biological Diversity. “While Rep. Frost shouldn’t have to introduce legislation just to get the EPA to follow its own rules, this bill provides clear direction the agency needs to keep our water, workers and wildlife safe from radiation and other pollutants tied to this toxic waste.”

    “We sincerely thank Representative Frost for championing the No Radioactive Roads Act, which takes decisive action to safeguard our communities from the significant risks posed by phosphogypsum. Florida has experienced firsthand the devastating consequences of mismanaging this hazardous material, including the Piney Point disaster, where over 200 million gallons of contaminated wastewater spilled into Tampa Bay. Using phosphogypsum in road construction would endanger workers, drivers, drinking water supplies, and fragile ecosystems, not just in Florida but across the country. This legislation is a crucial step toward protecting public health and preserving the safety of our water resources. We are committed to working with Congress and communities to ensure this vital bill becomes law and helps prevent future disasters,” said Jim Walsh, Policy Director, Food & Water Watch.

    “Clean water and resilient watersheds are the foundation of healthy coastal communities and strong economies. The use of radioactive waste in roads presents a serious risk that puts public health and the environment in jeopardy for generations to come. The ‘No Radioactive Roads Act’ introduces common-sense safeguards for protecting human health, requiring water quality monitoring, and ensuring transparency,” said Katie Bauman, Florida Policy Manager for Surfrider Foundation.

    “On behalf of the Save Split Oak Forest campaign, we strongly support Congressman Frost’s No Radioactive Roads Act. This legislation is crucial for safeguarding Florida’s ecosystems from the dangers of radioactive road runoff, which can harm our waterways, soil, and wildlife. Protecting conservation lands like Split Oak Forest is essential for preserving biodiversity and ensuring smart, sustainable growth. We urge all members of Congress to back this act to prevent harmful pollution and promote a future where Florida’s natural environment and communities can thrive together,” said Lee Perry, Lead Volunteer of the Save Split Oak Campaign.

    Additional Background:

    For over 30 years, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has prohibited the use of phosphogypsum (PG) for road construction because this fertilizer waste product emits deadly, cancer-causing radon gas and contains toxic heavy metals like arsenic, lead, mercury, and sulfur. 

    These toxins can become airborne or seep into the soil and groundwater. One of these elements, radium-226, has a 1,600-year half-life and will poison generations of people working on, living near, or traveling over any future radioactive roads.

    Scientific research makes clear that phosphogypsum (PG) is not safe to use as a road building material, but just months before leaving office, the first Trump Administration green-lit PG to be used in road construction.

    The Biden-Harris Administration quickly reversed the Trump Administration’s decision to allow PG in road construction but this means that PG’s threat to people’s health and safety can reemerge under the new Trump Administration. 

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Senate Intelligence Authorization Bill Advances with Key Provisions Authored by Senator Collins

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Maine Susan Collins

    Published: July 22, 2025

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Susan Collins, a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, announced that the Committee advanced the Intelligence Authorization Act (IAA) for Fiscal Year 2026 by a 15-2 vote. The bill authorizes funding, provides legal authorities, and enhances congressional oversight for the U.S. Intelligence Community, and includes multiple provisions authored by Senator Collins. The bill now awaits consideration by the full Senate.

    “The Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026 is critical for the Intelligence Community to defend U.S. interests and to arm policy and decision makers with critical information,” said Senator Collins. “This bipartisan bill would also build upon the effectiveness of the security clearance process, strengthen cybersecurity, and increase congressional oversight of the Intelligence Community.”

    The provisions co-authored by Senator Collins address the following issues:

    • Requiring improvement to the security of our voting and election systems through cybersecurity penetration testing and accreditation, by amending the Help America Vote Act of 2002. This provision was co-authored with Chairman Warner, and was originally introduced as the SECURE IT Act (“Strengthening and Enhancing Cybersecurity by Using Research, Education, Information, and Technology” Act) in the FY24 and FY25 IAA.
    • Ensuring continued support for victims of Anomalous Health Incidents (AHIs) by mandating that the Intelligence Community support Department of Defense AHI medical research, along with a requirement for the ODNI to issue standard AHI reporting guidelines. This provision was co-sponsored with Senators Cotton, Warner and Gillibrand.
    • Extension of the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act of 2015, to 2035. This provision was co-sponsored with Senators Warner, King, and Rounds.

    Additional subjects of critical importance to Senator Collins which were included in this IAA were: AHI budget increase to military intelligence centers and health agencies for medical and mechanical research; new policy requirements to support biomedical and biotechnological research to defend against various threats; and multiple security clearance reform initiatives.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Kelly highlights need for Medicare Advantage Prior Authorization reform during Ways & Means hearing

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Mike Kelly (R-PA)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, during a joint hearing of the Ways & Means Subcommittees on Health & Oversight, U.S. Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA), a member of the Ways & Means Subcommittee on Health, renewed calls for Medicare Advantage Prior Authorization reform and highlighted his highly popular legislation, the bipartisan Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act.

    “More than 33 million Americans, including more than 1.5 million Pennsylvanians, rely on Medicare Advantage as a part of their coverage. Patients, practitioners, and policymakers all agree — modernization of the prior authorization process is long overdue, and my legislation does just that,” said Rep. Kelly. “I am proud to reintroduce the Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act of 2025, which would move the health care sector into the 21st century by giving doctors and Medicare Advantage plans the tools to make health coverage decisions in a timely manner.”

    During Tuesday’s hearing, which focused on Medicare Advantage, Kelly highlighted how the legislation would improve both patient costs and patient outcomes. Kelly’s legislation has 145 co-sponsors in the U.S. House during the 119th Congress.

    You can watch his remarks from Tuesday’s hearing here.

    BACKGROUND

    The Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act would:

    • Establish an electronic prior authorization process for MA plans including a standardization for transactions and clinical attachments.
    • Increase transparency around MA prior authorization requirements and its use.
    • Clarify HHS’ authority to establish timeframes for e-prior authorization requests including   expedited determinations, real-time decisions for routinely approved items and services, and other prior authorization requests.
    • Expand beneficiary protections to improve enrollee experiences and outcomes.
    • Require HHS and other agencies to report to Congress on program integrity efforts and other ways to further improve the e-PA process.
    • Previously, Rep. Kelly led similar legislation in the 118th Congress. The Improving Seniors’ Timely Access to Care Act unanimously passed the House in the 117th Congress and was cosponsored by a majority of members in the Senate and House of Representatives. 

    You can read the full bill text here and a section-by-section here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Timberland Bancorp Third Fiscal Quarter Net Income Increases to $7.10 Million

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Quarterly EPS Increases 22% to $0.90 from $0.74 One Year Ago
    • Quarterly Net Interest Margin Increases to 3.80%
    • Quarterly Return on Average Assets Increases to 1.47%
    • Quarterly Return on Average Equity Increases to 11.23%
    • Announces New Stock Repurchase Program

    HOQUIAM, Wash., July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSBK) (“Timberland” or “the Company”), the holding company for Timberland Bank (the “Bank”), today reported net income of $7.10 million, or $0.90 per diluted common share for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. This compares to net income of $6.76 million, or $0.85 per diluted common share for the preceding quarter and $5.92 million, or $0.74 per diluted common share, for the comparable quarter one year ago.

    For the first nine months of fiscal 2025, Timberland’s net income increased 16% to $20.72 million, or $2.60 per diluted common share, from $17.93 million, or $2.21 per diluted common share for the first nine months of fiscal 2024.

    “Timberland delivered solid third fiscal quarter results, driven by continued net interest margin expansion and steady balance sheet growth,” stated Dean Brydon, Chief Executive Officer. “Net income and earnings per share increased 20% and 22%, respectively, compared to the third fiscal quarter a year ago. Compared to the prior quarter, net income and earnings per share increased 5% and 6%, respectively, primarily due to higher net interest income and non-interest income. We also posted year-over-year improvements across all key profitability metrics, and our tangible book value per share (non-GAAP) continued its upward trend. Looking ahead we believe our strong capital position, solid earnings, and continued focus on disciplined growth position us well to navigate the current environment and drive long-term shareholder value.”

    “As a result of Timberland’s strong earnings and sound capital position, our Board of Directors announced a quarterly cash dividend to shareholders of $0.26 per share, payable on August 22, 2025, to shareholders of record on August 8, 2025,” stated Jonathan Fischer, President and Chief Operating Officer. “This represents the 51st consecutive quarter Timberland will have paid a cash dividend. In addition, the Company also announced the adoption of a new stock repurchase program. We believe Timberland stock presents a strong investment opportunity, and buying back shares is a strategy to enhance long-term value for shareholders. Under the new repurchase program, the Company may repurchase up to 5% of the outstanding shares, or 393,842 shares. The new stock repurchase program replaces our existing stock repurchase program, which had 31,762 shares available to be repurchased.”

    “Our net interest margin continued to show positive momentum in the third fiscal quarter, expanding to 3.80%,” said Marci Basich, Chief Financial Officer. “This represents a one basis point increase from the prior quarter and a 27 basis point improvement compared to the same period last year, reflecting our disciplined asset-liability management and favorable shift in earning asset yields. Total deposits grew by $19 million, or 1%, during the quarter, driven primarily by higher balances in certificates of deposit. This growth highlights the continued strength of our customer relationships and the effectiveness of our deposit-gathering strategies. We remain focused on maintaining a well-balanced funding mix while sustaining stable margin performance going forward.”

    “The loan portfolio continues to expand at a steady pace, with growth of 2% over the prior quarter and 3% year-over year,” Brydon continued. “Credit quality remains an area we are monitoring closely, as we are seeing a mix of stable-to-positive trends alongside a few metrics that have shown modest deterioration. Net charge-offs continue to be minimal, with net recoveries of $1,000 during the third quarter. Our non-performing assets (“NPA”) ratio increased to 0.21% at June 30, 2025, compared to 0.13% at the end of the prior quarter. However, it remains a slight improvement from the 0.22% reported a year ago. Although non-accrual loans increased this quarter primarily due to a single matured loan, total non-accrual balances remain modestly below year-ago levels.”

    Earnings and Balance Sheet Highlights (at or for the periods ended June 30, 2025, compared to June 30, 2024, or March 31, 2025):
      
        Earnings Highlights:

    • Earnings per diluted common share (“EPS”) increased 6% to $0.90 for the current quarter from $0.85 for the preceding quarter and increased 22% from $0.74 for the comparable quarter one year ago; EPS increased 18% to $2.60 for the first nine months of fiscal 2025 from $2.21 for the first nine months of fiscal 2024;
    • Net income increased 5% to $7.10 million for the current quarter from $6.76 million for the preceding quarter and increased 20% from $5.92 million for the comparable quarter one year ago; Net income increased 16% to $20.72 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2025 from $17.93 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2024;
    • Return on average equity (“ROE”) and return on average assets (“ROA”) for the current quarter were 11.23% and 1.47%, respectively;
    • Net interest margin (“NIM”) for the current quarter expanded to 3.80% from 3.79% for the preceding quarter and 3.53% for the comparable quarter one year ago; and
    • The efficiency ratio for the current quarter improved to 54.48% from 56.25% for the preceding quarter and 58.97% for the comparable quarter one year ago.

       Balance Sheet Highlights:

    • Total assets increased 1% from the prior quarter and increased 3% year-over-year;
    • Net loans receivable increased 2% from the prior quarter and increased 3% year-over-year;
    • Total deposits increased 1% from the prior quarter and increased 3% year-over-year;
    • Total shareholders’ equity increased 2% from the prior quarter and increased 6% year-over-year; 34,236 shares of common stock were repurchased during the current quarter for $1.02 million;
    • Non-performing assets to total assets ratio was 0.21% at June 30, 2025 compared to 0.13% at March 31, 2025 and 0.22% at June 30, 2024;
    • Book and tangible book (non-GAAP) values per common share increased to $32.58 and $30.62 respectively, at June 30, 2025; and
    • Liquidity (both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet) remained strong at June 30, 2025 with only $20 million in borrowings and additional secured borrowing line capacity of $674 million available through the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and the Federal Reserve.

    Operating Results

    Operating revenue (net interest income before the provision for credit losses plus non-interest income) for the current quarter increased 3% to $20.50 million from $19.90 million for the preceding quarter and increased 9% from $18.77 million for the comparable quarter one year ago. The increase in operating revenue compared to the preceding quarter was primarily due to increases in total interest and dividend income and non-interest income, which were partially offset by an increase in total funding costs. Operating revenue increased 8% to $60.06 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2025 from $55.82 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2024, primarily due to an increase in total interest and dividend income, which was partially offset by an increase in funding costs.

    Net interest income increased $409,000, or 2%, to $17.62 million for the current quarter from $17.21 million for the preceding quarter and increased $1.64 million, or 10%, from $15.98 million for the comparable quarter one year ago. The increase in net interest income compared to the preceding quarter was primarily due to a $20.80 million increase in the average balance of total interest-earning assets and, to a lesser extent, a two-basis point increase in the weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets to 5.50% from 5.48%. These increases were partially offset by a $20.21 million increase in the average balance of interest-bearing liabilities and a two-basis point increase in the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. Timberland’s NIM for the current quarter expanded to 3.80% from 3.79% for the preceding quarter and 3.53% for the comparable quarter one year ago.   The NIM for the current quarter was increased by approximately four basis points due to the collection of $102,000 in pre-payment penalties, non-accrual interest, and late fees, and the accretion of $68,000 of the fair value discount on acquired loans.   The NIM for the preceding quarter was increased by approximately five basis points due to the collection of $201,000 in pre-payment penalties, non-accrual interest, and late fees, and the accretion of $17,000 of the fair value discount on acquired loans.   The NIM for the comparable quarter one year ago was increased by approximately three basis points due to the collection of $124,000 in pre-payment penalties, non-accrual interest, and late fees, and the accretion of $9,000 of the fair value discount on acquired loans. Net interest income for the first nine months of fiscal 2025 increased $4.19 million, or 9%, to $51.81 million from $47.62 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2024, primarily due to a 32 basis point increase in the weighted average yield of total interest-earning assets to 5.49% from 5.17% and a $49.96 million increase in the average balance of total interest-earning assets. These increases to net interest income were partially offset by a seven basis point increase in the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities to 2.53% from 2.46% and a $58.86 million increase in the average balance of total interest-bearing liabilities. Timberland’s NIM expanded to 3.74% for the first nine months of fiscal 2025 from 3.53% for the first nine months of fiscal 2024.

    A $351,000 provision for credit losses on loans was recorded for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. The provision was primarily due to loan portfolio growth and changes in the composition of the loan portfolio. This compares to a $237,000 provision for credit losses on loans for the preceding quarter and a $264,000 provision for credit losses on loans for the comparable quarter one year ago. In addition, a $93,000 provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments and a $4,000 recapture of credit losses on investment securities were recorded for the current quarter.  

    Non-interest income increased $188,000, or 7%, to $2.88 million for the current quarter from $2.69 million for the preceding quarter and increased $84,000, or 3%, from $2.79 million for the comparable quarter one year ago. The increase in non-interest income compared to the preceding quarter was primarily due to an increase in ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees and smaller changes in several other categories. Fiscal year-to-date non-interest income increased by 1%, to $8.26 million from $8.20 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2024.

    Total operating (non-interest) expenses for the current quarter decreased $27,000 (less than 1%), to $11.17 million from $11.19 million for the preceding quarter and increased $98,000, or 1%, from $11.07 million for the comparable quarter one year ago.   The decrease in operating expenses compared to the preceding quarter was primarily due to decreases in salaries and employee benefits, premises and equipment, technology and communications, professional fees, and smaller decreases in several other expense categories. These decreases were partially offset by increases in state and local taxes and smaller increases in several other expense categories. The efficiency ratio for the current quarter improved to 54.48% from 56.25% for the preceding quarter and 58.97% for the comparable quarter one year ago. Fiscal year-to-date operating expenses increased 2% to $33.43 million from $32.68 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2024. The efficiency ratio for the first nine months of fiscal 2025 improved to 55.65% from 58.55% for the first nine months of fiscal 2024.

    The provision for income taxes for the current quarter increased $85,000, or 5%, to $1.79 million from $1.71 million for the preceding quarter, primarily due to higher taxable income. Timberland’s effective income tax rate was 20.1% for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to 20.2% for the quarter ended March 31, 2025 and 20.6% for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. Timberland’s effective income tax rate was 20.1% for the first nine months of fiscal 2025 compared to 20.2% for the first nine months of fiscal 2024.  

    Balance Sheet Management

    Total assets increased $24.46 million, or 1%, during the quarter to $1.96 billion at June 30, 2025 from $1.93 billion at March 31, 2025 and increased $56.56 million, or 3%, from $1.90 billion one year ago. The increase during the current quarter was primarily due to a $21.42 million increase in net loans receivable and smaller increases in several other categories.

    Liquidity

    Timberland has continued to maintain a strong liquidity position, both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet. Liquidity, as measured by the sum of cash and cash equivalents, CDs held for investment, and available for sale investment securities, was 17.0% of total liabilities at June 30, 2025, compared to 16.9% at March 31, 2025, and 14.7% one year ago. Timberland also had secured borrowing line capacity of $674 million available through the FHLB and the Federal Reserve at June 30, 2025. With a strong and diversified deposit base, only 17% of Timberland’s deposits were uninsured or uncollateralized at June 30, 2025. (Note: This calculation excludes public deposits that are fully collateralized.)

    Loans

    Net loans receivable increased $21.42 million, or 2%, during the quarter to $1.44 billion at June 30, 2025 from $1.42 billion at March 31, 2025. This increase was primarily due to a $21.83 million increase in multi-family loans, a $5.67 million increase in commercial real estate loans, a $3.89 million increase in land loans and smaller increases in several other loan categories. These increases were partially offset by a $5.50 million decrease in construction loans, a $4.80 million decrease in commercial business loans, and smaller decreases in several other loan categories. The increase in multi-family loans was, in large part, due to several multi-family construction projects being completed and converting to permanent financing during the quarter.

    Loan Portfolio
    ($ in thousands)
     
      June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024
      Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent
    Mortgage loans:                      
    One- to four-family (a) $317,574     21%     $315,421     21%     $288,611     19%  
    Multi-family   200,418     13       178,590     12       177,950     12  
    Commercial   607,924     40       602,248     40       597,865     40  
    Construction – custom and                      
    owner/builder   128,900     8       114,401     7       128,222     9
    Construction – speculative
    one-to four-family
      9,595     1       9,791     1       11,441     1  
    Construction – commercial   15,992     1       22,352     1       32,130     2  
    Construction – multi-family   32,731     2       46,602     3       35,631     2  
    Construction – land                      
    development   15,461     1       15,032     1       19,104     1  
    Land   36,193     2       32,301     2       32,384     2  
    Total mortgage loans   1,364,788     89       1,336,738     88       1,323,338     88  
                           
    Consumer loans:                      
    Home equity and second                      
    mortgage   47,511     3       47,458     3       43,679     3  
    Other   2,176     —       2,375     —       3,121     —  
    Total consumer loans   49,687     3       49,833     3       46,800     3  
                           
    Commercial loans:                      
    Commercial business loans   126,497     8       131,243     9       136,213     9  
    SBA PPP loans   101     —       156     —       314     —  
    Total commercial loans   126,598     8       131,399     9       136,527     9  
    Total loans   1,541,073     100%       1,517,970     100%       1,506,665     100%  
    Less:                      
    Undisbursed portion of                      
    construction loans in                      
    process   (76,272)           (75,042)           (87,196)      
    Deferred loan origination                      
    fees   (5,427)           (5,329)           (5,404)      
    Allowance for credit losses   (17,878)           (17,525)           (17,046)      
    Total loans receivable, net $1,441,496         $1,420,074         $1,397,019      

    _______________________
    (a)   Does not include one- to four-family loans held for sale totaling $1,763, $1,151, and $1,795 at June 30, 2025, March 31, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively.  

    The following table provides a breakdown of commercial real estate (“CRE”) mortgage loans by collateral type as of June 30, 2025:

    CRE Loan Portfolio Breakdown by Collateral
    ($ in thousands)
    Collateral Type   Balance   Percent of
    CRE
    Portfolio
      Percent of
    Total Loan
    Portfolio
      Average
    Balance Per
    Loan
      Non-
    Accrual
    Industrial warehouses   $128 822   21%     8%     $1 301   $161
    Medical/dental offices     81 238   13     5       1 269     —
    Office buildings     68 916   11     5       801     —
    Other retail buildings     54 472   9     3       567     —
    Mini-storage     38 483   6     2       1 539     —
    Hotel/motel     31 656   5     2       2 638     —
    Restaurants     27 485   5     2       585     —
    Gas stations/conv. stores     24 359   4     2       1 015     —
    Churches     14 690   3     1       918     —
    Nursing homes     13 532   2     1       2 255     —
    Shopping centers     10 507   2     1       1 751     —
    Mobile home parks     8 882   2     1       444     —
    Additional CRE     104 882   17     7       760     —    
    Total CRE   $607 924   100%     40%     $951   $161

    Timberland originated $81.99 million in loans during the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to $56.76 million for the preceding quarter and $74.32 million for the comparable quarter one year ago. Timberland continues to originate fixed-rate one- to four-family mortgage loans, a portion of which are sold into the secondary market for asset-liability management purposes and to generate non-interest income.   During the current quarter, fixed-rate one- to four-family mortgage loans totaling $5.11 million were sold compared to $5.17 million for the preceding quarter and $3.05 million for the comparable quarter one year ago.

    Investment Securities
            
    Timberland’s investment securities and CDs held for investment increased $2.04 million, or 1%, to $237.36 million at June 30, 2025, from $235.33 million at March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily due to the purchase of additional U.S. government agency mortgage-backed investment securities and U.S. Treasury investment securities. Partially offsetting these increases was the sale of $13.49 million available for sale investment securities, which resulted in a net gain of $24,000.

    Deposits

    Total deposits increased $18.65 million, or 1%, during the quarter to $1.67 billion at June 30, 2025, from $1.65 billion at March 31, 2025. The quarter’s increase consisted of a $16.01 million increase in certificates of deposit account balances, a $4.66 million increase in money market account balances, and a $1.60 million increase in NOW checking account balances. These decreases were partially offset by a $2.03 million decrease in savings account balances and a $1.59 million decrease in non-interest-bearing checking account balances.

    Deposit Breakdown
    ($ in thousands)
     
          June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024  
          Amount    Percent   Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent  
    Non-interest-bearing demand     $406,222   24%   $407,811   25%   $407,125   25%  
    NOW checking     334,922   20   333,325   20   324,795   20  
    Savings     205,829   12   207,857   13   207,921   13  
    Money market     305,207   18   300,552   18   327,162   20  
    Certificates of deposit under $250     244,063   15   227,137   14   195,022   12  
    Certificates of deposit $250 and over     126,254   8   124,009   7   117,788   7  
    Certificates of deposit – brokered     46,980   3   50,139   3   48,731   3  
    Total deposits     $1,669,477   100%   $1,650,830   100%   $1,628,544   100%  

    Borrowings

    Total borrowings were $20.00 million at both June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025. At June 30, 2025, the weighted average rate on the borrowings was 3.97%.

    Shareholders’ Equity and Capital Ratios

    Total shareholders’ equity increased $4.14 million, or 2%, to $256.66 million at June 30, 2025, from $252.52 million at March 31, 2025, and increased $15.44 million, or 6%, from $241.22 million at June 30, 2024.   The increase in shareholders’ equity during the quarter was primarily due to net income of $7.10 million, which was partially offset by the payment of $2.05 million in dividends to shareholders and the repurchase of 34,236 shares of common stock for $1.02 million (an average price of $29.74 per share).

    Timberland remains well capitalized with a total risk-based capital ratio of 20.54%, a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 12.63%, a tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio (non-GAAP) of 12.42%, and a shareholders’ equity to total assets ratio of 13.11% at June 30, 2025.   Timberland’s held to maturity investment securities were $141.57 million at June 30, 2025, with a net unrealized loss of $5.99 million (pre-tax). Although not permitted by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), including these unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) would result in a ratio of shareholders’ equity to total assets of 12.90%, compared to 13.11%, as reported.

    New Stock Repurchase Program

    The Company announced a new stock repurchase program today. Under the repurchase program, the Company may repurchase up to 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares, or 393,842 shares. The new stock repurchase program replaces the existing stock repurchase program which had 31,762 shares available to be repurchased.

    The repurchase program permits shares to be repurchased in open market or private transactions, through block trades, and pursuant to any trading plan that may be adopted in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Repurchases will be made at management’s discretion at prices management considers to be attractive and in the best interest of both the Company and its shareholders, subject to the availability of stock, general market conditions, the trading price of the stock, alternative uses for capital, and the Company’s financial performance. Open market purchases will be conducted in accordance with the limitations set forth in Rule 10b-18 of the SEC and other applicable legal requirements. The repurchase program may be suspended, terminated, or modified at any time for any reason, including market conditions, the cost of repurchasing the shares, the availability of alternative investment opportunities, liquidity, and other factors deemed appropriate. These factors may also affect the timing and amount of share repurchases. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to purchase any particular number of shares.

    Asset Quality
    Timberland’s non-performing assets to total assets ratio was 0.21% at June 30, 2025, compared to 0.13% at March 31, 2025 and 0.22% at June 30, 2024.   Net recoveries totaled $1,000 for the current quarter compared to net charge-offs of less than $1,000 for the preceding quarter and net charge-offs of $36,000 for the comparable quarter one year ago. During the current quarter, provisions for credit losses of $351,000 on loans and $93,000 unfunded commitments were made, which was partially offset by a $4,000 recapture of credit losses on investment securities. The allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) for loans as a percentage of loans receivable was 1.23% at June 30, 2025, compared to 1.22% at March 31, 2025 and 1.21% one year ago.

    Total delinquent loans (past due 30 days or more) and non-accrual loans increased $2.86 million or 86%, to $6.18 million at June 30, 2025, from $3.32 million at March 31, 2025 and increased $1.95 million, or 46%, from $4.23 million at June 30, 2024. Non-accrual loans increased $1.52 million, or 65%, to $3.84 million at June 30, 2025 from $2.33 million at March 31, 2025 and decreased $277,000, or 7%, from $4.12 million at March 31, 2024.   The quarterly increase in non-accrual loans was primarily due to one loan (secured by several single family homes) being past maturity. The loan is well collateralized (based on recent appraisals) and the Bank is working with the borrower to renew the loan. Loans graded “Substandard” totaled $32.37 million (or 2% of total loans receivable) at June 30, 2025.

    Non-Accrual Loans
    ($ in thousands)
     
      June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024
      Amount   Quantity   Amount   Quantity   Amount   Quantity
    Mortgage loans:                      
    One- to four-family $1,781   1   $47   1   $135   2
    Commercial   161   2     324   3     1,310   4
    Construction – custom and                      
    owner/builder   —   —     —   —     152   1
    Total mortgage loans   1,942   3     371   4     1,597   7
                           
    Consumer loans:                      
    Home equity and second                      
    mortgage   575   3     575   3     615   3
    Other   —   —     —   —     —   —
    Total consumer loans   575   3     575   3     615   3
                           
    Commercial business loans   1,326   9     1,381   11     1,908   8
    Total loans $3,843   15   $2,327   18   $4,120   18

            
    Timberland had two properties classified as other real estate owned (“OREO”) at June 30, 2025:

      June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024
      Amount   Quantity   Amount   Quantity   Amount   Quantity
    Other real estate owned:                      
    Commercial $221   1   $221   1   $ —   —
    Land   —   1     —   1     —   1
    Total mortgage loans $221   2   $221   2   $ —   1

    About Timberland Bancorp, Inc.
    Timberland Bancorp, Inc., a Washington corporation, is the holding company for Timberland Bank. The Bank opened for business in 1915 and primarily serves consumers and businesses across Grays Harbor, Thurston, Pierce, King, Kitsap and Lewis counties, Washington with a full range of lending and deposit services through its 23 branches (including its main office in Hoquiam).    

    Disclaimer
    Certain matters discussed in this press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, are based on certain assumptions and often include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about future economic performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or implied by our forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to: potential adverse impacts to economic conditions in our local market areas, other markets where the Company has lending relationships, or other aspects of the Company’s business operations or financial markets, including, without limitation, as a result of employment levels, labor shortages and the effects of inflation, a potential recession or slowed economic growth; continuing elevated levels of inflation and the impact of current and future monetary policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) in response thereto; the effects of any federal government shutdown; credit risks of lending activities, including any deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets which may lead to increased losses and non-performing loans in our loan portfolio resulting in our ACL not being adequate to cover actual losses and thus requiring us to materially increase our ACL through the provision for credit losses; changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas; changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short and long-term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources; fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes, land and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas; secondary market conditions for loans and our ability to sell loans in the secondary market; results of examinations of us by the Federal Reserve and of our bank subsidiary by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Division of Banks or other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such regulatory authority may, among other things, institute a formal or informal enforcement action against us or our bank subsidiary which could require us to increase our ACL, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position or affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits or impose additional requirements or restrictions on us, any of which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; the impact of bank failures or adverse developments at other banks and related negative press about the banking industry in general on investor and depositor sentiment; legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business including changes in banking, securities and tax law, in regulatory policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules; our ability to attract and retain deposits; our ability to control operating costs and expenses; the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation; difficulties in reducing risks associated with the loans in our consolidated balance sheet; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our work force and potential associated charges; disruptions, security breaches, or other adverse events, failures or interruptions in, or attacks on, our information technology systems or on the third-party vendors who perform several of our critical processing functions; our ability to retain key members of our senior management team; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; our ability to implement our business strategies; our ability to manage loan delinquency rates; increased competitive pressures among financial services companies; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions; our ability to pay dividends on our common stock; the quality and composition of our securities portfolio and the impact if any adverse changes in the securities markets, including on market liquidity; inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; the economic impact of climate change, severe weather events, natural disasters, pandemics, epidemics and other public health crises, acts of war or terrorism, civil unrest and other external events on our business; other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services; and other risks described elsewhere in this press release and in the Company’s other reports filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this press release and in the other public statements we make are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements included in this press release to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements discussed in this document might not occur and we caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These risks could cause our actual results for fiscal 2025 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements by, or on behalf of, us, and could negatively affect the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations as well as its stock price performance.

    TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
      Three Months Ended
    ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited)   June 30,   March 31,   June 30,
          2025       2025       2024  
      Interest and dividend income            
      Loans receivable   $21,411     $20,896     $19,537  
      Investment securities     2,064       2,003       2,335  
      Dividends from mutual funds, FHLB stock and other investments     83       82       94  
      Interest bearing deposits in banks     1,986       1,884       2,173  
      Total interest and dividend income     25,544       24,865       24,139  
                   
      Interest expense            
      Deposits     7,721       7,454       7,938  
      Borrowings     201       198       220  
      Total interest expense     7,922       7,652       8,158  
      Net interest income     17,622       17,213       15,981  
      Provision for credit losses – loans     351       237       264  
      Recapture of credit losses – investment securities     (4)       (5)       (12)  
      Prov. for (recapture of ) credit losses – unfunded commitments     93       14       (8)  
      Net int. income after provision for (recapture of) credit losses     17,182       16,967       15,737  
                   
      Non-interest income            
      Service charges on deposits     966       959       1,014  
      ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees     1,262       1,176       1,297  
      Gain on sales of investment securities, net     24       —       —  
      Gain on sales of loans, net     138       122       68  
      Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) net earnings     171       165       158  
      Other     314       265       254  
      Total non-interest income, net     2,875       2,687       2,791  
                   
      Non-interest expense            
      Salaries and employee benefits     5,825       5,977       5,928  
      Premises and equipment     973       1,075       1,011  
      Gain on sale of premises and equipment, net     —       —       (3)  
      Advertising     182       189       211  
      OREO and other repossessed assets, net     8       9       —  
      ATM and debit card processing     658       521       580  
      Postage and courier     137       142       130  
      State and local taxes     570       335       335  
      Professional fees     341       431       335  
      FDIC insurance     211       219       208  
      Loan administration and foreclosure     99       155       156  
      Technology and communications     993       1,121       1,086  
      Deposit operations     345       319       450  
      Amortization of core deposit intangible (“CDI”)     45       45       56  
      Other, net     780       656       586  
      Total non-interest expense, net     11,167       11,194       11,069  
                   
      Income before income taxes     8,890       8,460       7,459  
      Provision for income taxes     1,790       1,705       1,535  
      Net income   $7,100     $6,755     $5,924  
                   
      Net income per common share:            
      Basic   $0.90     $0.85     $0.74  
      Diluted     0.90       0.85       0.74  
                   
      Weighted average common shares outstanding:            
      Basic     7,893,308       7,937,063       8,004,552  
      Diluted     7,921,762       7,968,632       8,039,345  
    TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
      Nine Months Ended
    ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited)   June 30,   June 30,
          2025       2024  
      Interest and dividend income        
      Loans receivable   $63,339     $56,841  
      Investment securities     6,205       6,892  
      Dividends from mutual funds, FHLB stock and other investments     252       266  
      Interest bearing deposits in banks     5,870       5,791  
      Total interest and dividend income     75,666       69,790  
               
      Interest expense        
      Deposits     23,259       21,383  
      Borrowings     602       787  
      Total interest expense     23,861       22,170  
      Net interest income     51,805       47,620  
      Provision for credit losses – loans     640       810  
      Recapture of credit losses – investment securities     (14)       (20)  
      Prov. for (recapture of) credit losses – unfunded commitments     87       (130)  
      Net int. income after provision for (recapture of) credit losses     51,092       46,960  
               
      Non-interest income        
      Service charges on deposits     2,924       3,024  
      ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees     3,706       3,773  
      Gain on sales of investment securities, net     24       —  
      Gain on sales of loans, net     303       188  
      Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) net earnings     503       470  
      Other     799       749  
      Total non-interest income, net     8,259       8,204  
               
      Non-interest expense        
      Salaries and employee benefits     17,893       17,863  
      Premises and equipment     2,998       3,065  
      Gain on sale of premises and equipment, net     —       (3)  
      Advertising     552       556  
      OREO and other repossessed assets, net     17       1  
      ATM and debit card processing     1,700       1,796  
      Postage and courier     401       401  
      State and local taxes     1,251       979  
      Professional fees     1,118       908  
      FDIC insurance     640       624  
      Loan administration and foreclosure     383       395  
      Technology and communications     3,253       3,101  
      Deposit operations     997       1,094  
      Amortization of core deposit intangible (“CDI”)     135       169  
      Other, net     2,090       1,735  
      Total non-interest expense, net     33,428       32,684  
               
      Income before income taxes     25,923       22,480  
      Provision for income taxes     5,208       4,552  
      Net income   $20,715     $17,928  
               
      Net income per common share:        
      Basic   $2.61     $2.22  
      Diluted     2.60       2.21  
               
      Weighted average common shares outstanding:        
      Basic     7,929,626       8,067,068  
      Diluted     7,963,412       8,109,043  
    TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
     
    ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited)   June 30,   March 31,   June 30,
          2025       2025       2024  
    Assets            
    Cash and due from financial institutions   $32,532     $26,010     $25,566  
    Interest-bearing deposits in banks     161,095       165,201       133,347  
      Total cash and cash equivalents     193,627       191,211       158,913  
                   
    Certificates of deposit (“CDs”) held for investment, at cost     8,462       8,711       10,458  
    Investment securities:            
      Held to maturity, at amortized cost (net of ACL – investment securities)     141,570       140,954       176,787  
      Available for sale, at fair value     86,475       84,807       74,515  
    Investments in equity securities, at fair value     855       853       836  
    FHLB stock     2,045       2,045       2,037  
    Other investments, at cost     3,000       3,000       3,000  
    Loans held for sale     1,763       1,151       1,795  
                 
    Loans receivable     1,459,374       1,437,599       1,414,065  
    Less: ACL – loans     (17,878)       (17,525)       (17,046)  
      Net loans receivable     1,441,496       1,420,074       1,397,019  
                   
    Premises and equipment, net     21,490       21,436       21,558  
    OREO and other repossessed assets, net     221       221       —  
    BOLI     24,113       23,942       23,436  
    Accrued interest receivable     7,174       7,127       7,045  
    Goodwill     15,131       15,131       15,131  
    CDI     316       361       508  
    Loan servicing rights, net     911       1,051       1,526  
    Operating lease right-of-use assets     1,248       1,324       1,550  
    Other assets     7,295       9,331       4,515  
      Total assets   $1,957,192     $1,932,730     $1,900,629  
                   
    Liabilities and shareholders’ equity            
    Deposits: Non-interest-bearing demand   $406,222     $407,811     $407,125  
    Deposits: Interest-bearing     1,263,255       1,243,019       1,221,419  
      Total deposits     1,669,477       1,650,830       1,628,544  
                   
    Operating lease liabilities     1,350       1,426       1,649  
    FHLB borrowings     20,000       20,000       20,000  
    Other liabilities and accrued expenses     9,701       7,950       9,213  
      Total liabilities     1,700,528       1,680,206       1,659,406  
                 
    Shareholders’ equity            
    Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized;
            7,876,853 shares issued and outstanding – June 30, 2025
            7,903,489 shares issued and outstanding – March 31, 2025
            7,953,431 shares issued and outstanding – June 30, 2024
        27,226       28,028       30,681  
    Retained earnings     230,213       225,166       211,087  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (775)       (670)       (545)  
      Total shareholders’ equity     256,664       252,524       241,223  
      Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $1,957,192     $1,932,730     $1,900,629  
      Three Months Ended
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS:   June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024
    Return on average assets (a)     1.47%       1.43%       1.25%  
    Return on average equity (a)     11.23%       10.95%       9.95%  
    Net interest margin (a)     3.80%       3.79%       3.53%  
    Efficiency ratio     54.48%       56.25%       58.97%  
                 
      Nine Months Ended
        June 30, 2025       June 30, 2024
    Return on average assets (a)     1.44%           1.27%  
    Return on average equity (a)     11.07%           10.10%  
    Net interest margin (a)     3.74%           3.53%  
    Efficiency ratio     55.65%           58.55%  
                 
      Three Months Ended
    ASSET QUALITY RATIOS AND DATA: ($ in thousands)   June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024
    Non-accrual loans   $3,843     $2,327     $4,120  
    Loans past due 90 days and still accruing     —       —       —  
    Non-performing investment securities     38       41       72  
    OREO and other repossessed assets     221       221       —  
    Total non-performing assets (b)   $4,102     $2,589     $4,192  
                 
    Non-performing assets to total assets (b)     0.21%       0.13%       0.22%  
    Net charge-offs (recoveries) during quarter   $(1)     $ —     $36  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans to non-accrual loans     465%       753%       414%  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans to loans receivable (c)     1.23%       1.22%       1.21%  
                 
                 
    CAPITAL RATIOS:            
    Tier 1 leverage capital     12.63%       12.55%       12.04%  
    Tier 1 risk-based capital     19.29%       19.04%       17.97%  
    Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital     19.29%       19.04%       17.97%  
    Total risk-based capital     20.54%       20.29%       19.22%  
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP)     12.42%       12.36%       11.97%  
                 
    BOOK VALUES:            
    Book value per common share   $32.58     $31.95     $30.33  
    Tangible book value per common share (d)     30.62       29.99       28.36  

    ________________________________________________

    (a) Annualized
    (b) Non-performing assets include non-accrual loans, loans past due 90 days and still accruing, non-performing investment securities and OREO and other repossessed assets.
    (c) Does not include loans held for sale and is before the allowance for credit losses.
    (d) Tangible common equity divided by common shares outstanding (non-GAAP).                                

    AVERAGE BALANCES, YIELDS, AND RATES – QUARTERLY
    ($ in thousands)
    (unaudited)

      For the Three Months Ended 
      June 30, 2025    March 31, 2025    June 30, 2024 
      Amount   Rate   Amount   Rate   Amount   Rate
                           
    Assets                      
    Loans receivable and loans held for sale $ 1,450,350     5.92 %   $ 1,435,999     5.90 %   $ 1,391,582     5.65 %
    Investment securities and FHLB stock (1)   232,272     3.71       232,532     3.64             268,954     3.63  
    Interest-earning deposits in banks and CDs   178,887     4.45       172,175     4.44       161,421     5.41  
    Total interest-earning assets   1,861,509     5.50       1,840,706     5.48            1,821,957     5.33  
    Other assets         79,715           77,563           82,008      
    Total assets $ 1,941,224         $ 1,918,269         $ 1,903,965      
                           
    Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity                      
    NOW checking accounts $ 333,074     1.39 %   $ 328,115     1.32 %   $ 329,344     1.29 %
    Money market accounts   304,526     3.16       306,137     3.18       326,023     3.56  
    Savings accounts   205,592     0.35       206,054     0.28       208,488     0.27  
    Certificates of deposit accounts   363,342     3.77       343,945     3.82       311,545     4.21  
    Brokered CDs   48,028     4.83       50,104     4.85       45,442     5.32  
    Total interest-bearing deposits   1,254,562     2.47       1,234,355     2.45       1,220,842     2.62  
    Borrowings   20,002     4.03       20,000     4.04       20,001     4.42  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   1,274,564     2.49       1,254,355     2.47       1,240,843     2.64  
                           
    Non-interest-bearing demand deposits   402,717           403,738           413,494      
    Other liabilities   10,266           10,064           10,245      
    Shareholders’ equity   253,677           250,112           239,383      
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 1,941,224         $ 1,918,269         $ 1,903,965      
                           
    Interest rate spread     3.01 %       3.01 %       2.69 %
    Net interest margin (2)     3.80 %       3.79 %       3.53 %
    Average interest-earning assets to                      
    average interest-bearing liabilities   146.05 %         146.75 %         146.83 %    

               _____________________________________
    (1) Includes other investments
    (2) Net interest margin = annualized net interest income /
          average interest-earning assets
            

    AVERAGE BALANCES, YIELDS, AND RATES
    ($ in thousands)
    (unaudited)

      For the Nine Months Ended 
      June 30, 2025    June 30, 2024 
      Amount   Rate   Amount   Rate
                   
    Assets              
    Loans receivable and loans held for sale $ 1,441,506     5.87 %   $ 1,363,213     5.57 %
    Investment securities and FHLB stock (1)   237,400     3.81             294,789     3.24  
    Interest-earning deposits in banks and CDs       172,591     4.55       143,537     5.39  
    Total interest-earning assets        1,851,497     5.49            1,801,539     5.17  
    Other assets   77,595           81,650      
    Total assets $ 1,929,092         $ 1,883,189      
                   
    Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity              
    NOW checking accounts $ 329,883     1.36 %   $ 358,052     1.48 %
    Money market accounts   311,762     3.26       273,683     3.09  
    Savings accounts   205,764     0.30       214,275     0.24  
    Certificates of deposit accounts   346,313     3.89       291,707     4.12  
    Brokered CDs   48,169     4.71       42,856     5.37  
    Total interest-bearing deposits   1,241,891     2.50       1,180,573     2.42  
    Borrowings   20,001     4.02       22,457     4.68  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   1,261,892     2.53       1,203,030     2.46  
                   
    Non-interest-bearing demand deposits   406,906           431,849      
    Other liabilities             10,159           11,273      
    Shareholders’ equity   250,135           237,037      
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 1,929,092         $ 1,883,189      
                   
    Interest rate spread     2.96 %       2.71 %
    Net interest margin (2)     3.74 %       3.53 %
    Average interest-earning assets to              
    average interest-bearing liabilities   146.72 %         149.75 %    

    _____________________________________
    (1) Includes other investments
    (2) Net interest margin = annualized net interest income /
    average interest-earning assets

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    In addition to results presented in accordance with GAAP, this press release contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. Timberland believes that certain non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with information useful in understanding the Company’s financial performance; however, readers of this report are urged to review these non-GAAP financial measures in conjunction with GAAP results as reported.

    Financial measures that exclude intangible assets are non-GAAP measures. To provide investors with a broader understanding of capital adequacy, Timberland provides non-GAAP financial measures for tangible common equity, along with the GAAP measure. Tangible common equity is calculated as shareholders’ equity less goodwill and CDI. In addition, tangible assets equal total assets less goodwill and CDI.

    The following table provides a reconciliation of ending shareholders’ equity (GAAP) to ending tangible shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) and ending total assets (GAAP) to ending tangible assets (non-GAAP).

    ($ in thousands)   June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2024
                 
    Shareholders’ equity   $ 256,664     $ 252,524     $ 241,223  
    Less goodwill and CDI     (15,447)       (15,492)       (15,639)  
    Tangible common equity   $ 241,217     $ 237,032     $ 225,584  
                 
    Total assets   $ 1,957,192     $ 1,932,730     $ 1,900,629  
    Less goodwill and CDI     (15,447)       (15,492)       (15,639)  
    Tangible assets   $ 1,941,745     $ 1,917,238     $ 1,884,990  

    Contact: Dean J. Brydon, CEO 
    Jonathan A. Fischer, President & COO
    Marci A. Basich, CFO 
    (360) 533-4747 
    www.timberlandbank.com

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER SECURES PROVISION IN SENATE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BILL TO ADDRESS FORT DRUM’S LONG-NEEDED EXPANSION FOR MATERNAL HEALTH CARE TO SUPPORT MILITARY MOMS & FAMILIES ON BASE – AND AT RURAL…

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer

    Fort Drum Has History Of OB/GYN Staffing Shortage & Relying on Local Hospitals & Providers For Maternal Care; Amid Nationwide OB/GYN Shortage, Senator Says Department of Defense Needs To Boost Access To Maternal Health Care At Fort Drum & In Watertown, As Well As Military Installations Across The U.S.

    After Months Of Work, Schumer Just Secured Language In The Senate NDAA To Address The Longstanding Maternal Healthcare Issues At Fort Drum, Directing The DoD To Develop A Comprehensive Plan & Study Of The OB/GYN Shortage In The Greater Watertown Area

    Schumer: Fort Drum’s Military Moms & Families Deserve The Very Best When It Comes To HealthCare

    U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer today announced he has secured legislation in the Senate’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) to begin to address the long standing shortage of Obstetrician-Gynecologists (OB/GYNs) at Fort Drum. For years, Fort Drum has faced shortages of OB/GYNs, forcing soldiers and military families in need of maternal health care to seek care from local hospitals off base or to drive for hours when local care is unavailable.

    Schumer said if this language passes into the final NDDA it would require the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Defense Health Agency (DHA) to immediately begin work to create a comprehensive plan to expand OB/GYN care serving Fort Drum and the surrounding Watertown area.

    “Our Fort Drum military moms & families, who serve our nation proudly, deserve better access to vital maternal healthcare. But right now, our servicemembers at Fort Drum and their families often have to leave base to access the basic maternal healthcare they need. The bottom line is that we need to take better care of our brave military moms,” said Senator Schumer. “The North Country already experiences major shortages when it comes to recruiting OB/GYNs, and we can’t be forcing our military families who sacrifice so much to be stuck without the proper care they need when they move to our community in service to our country. That is why I am proud to have secured a provision in the Senate NDAA to put Fort Drum’s military moms & families’ first. This is a massive step in the right direction, and we need DoD to immediately address this urgent need to expand OB/GYN care at military installations and make sure families—both at Fort Drum and around the country—have what they need to be safe and healthy. Fort Drum is woven in the very fabric of the North Country, and our military families, military moms and those on the base deserve only the best when it comes to health care.”

    Fort Drum has a history of relying on the civilian healthcare network for primary health care, as well as specialty care provided by OB/GYNs. When Camp Drum became Fort Drum in 1974, the decision was made to not build a hospital on-post, and to instead only have a clinic, in order to integrate Fort Drum families with the local network in Watertown.

    Shortages of OB/GYN providers on base force those in need of maternal health care to seek care in the community for a multitude of reasons, which can range in urgency from routine check-ups to emergency childbirth. Samaritan Medical Center and Carthage Area Hospital serve Fort Drum soldiers and families with incredible dedication and top-notch medical care, but when their OB/GYNs are spread too thin, soldiers and families must travel over an hour and a half to Syracuse or farther for care. Schumer said this not only increases the risk to patients unnecessarily, but it also saddles soldiers with expenses that they are not eligible to be compensated for under the Department of Defense’s Joint Travel Regulation (JTR).

    To help fix the situation, Schumer proudly pushed for and successfully secured language in the Senate version of the NDAA to develop a plan & study the administrative and cost barriers to expanding OB/GYN care specifically in the Watertown area and to create a comprehensive plan to expand OB/GYN care serving Fort Drum. The provision also directs the Secretary of Defense to brief Congress on the plan December 1 of this year to ensure that there is no more delay in providing the Fort Drum community with reliable, high-quality maternal health care close to home.

    Schumer said the shortage of OB/GYNs at Fort Drum is part of a nationwide shortage, with particularly low access in rural areas. OB/GYNs have one of the highest attrition rates compared to most medical professions, and increased threats to OB/GYN safety driven by anti-abortion politics. Labor and delivery units, especially in rural areas, are currently closing nationwide due to low reimbursement, and with Medicaid paying for more than 40% of births across the country, even more L&D units are at risk. The recent GOP cuts to Medicaid – the largest in history – will force more units in rural parts of the country to close. This will exacerbate the already dire situation of limited access to critical OB/GYN care for those living on bases in rural America.

    Erika Flint, Executive Director, Fort Drum Regional Health Planning Organization, said “Ensuring access to high-quality OBGYN care for military members and their families continues to be a key focus for the local healthcare community. Maintaining this standard of care—locally and consistently—reflects a deep commitment to the well-being of those who serve. We appreciate the support and attention given to this issue by Senator Schumer, which affects our North Country families, both civilian and military alike.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER SECURES PROVISION IN SENATE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION BILL TO ADDRESS FORT DRUM’S LONG-NEEDED EXPANSION FOR MATERNAL HEALTH CARE TO SUPPORT MILITARY MOMS & FAMILIES ON BASE – AND AT RURAL…

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer

    Fort Drum Has History Of OB/GYN Staffing Shortage & Relying on Local Hospitals & Providers For Maternal Care; Amid Nationwide OB/GYN Shortage, Senator Says Department of Defense Needs To Boost Access To Maternal Health Care At Fort Drum & In Watertown, As Well As Military Installations Across The U.S.

    After Months Of Work, Schumer Just Secured Language In The Senate NDAA To Address The Longstanding Maternal Healthcare Issues At Fort Drum, Directing The DoD To Develop A Comprehensive Plan & Study Of The OB/GYN Shortage In The Greater Watertown Area

    Schumer: Fort Drum’s Military Moms & Families Deserve The Very Best When It Comes To HealthCare

    U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer today announced he has secured legislation in the Senate’s National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) to begin to address the long standing shortage of Obstetrician-Gynecologists (OB/GYNs) at Fort Drum. For years, Fort Drum has faced shortages of OB/GYNs, forcing soldiers and military families in need of maternal health care to seek care from local hospitals off base or to drive for hours when local care is unavailable.

    Schumer said if this language passes into the final NDDA it would require the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Defense Health Agency (DHA) to immediately begin work to create a comprehensive plan to expand OB/GYN care serving Fort Drum and the surrounding Watertown area.

    “Our Fort Drum military moms & families, who serve our nation proudly, deserve better access to vital maternal healthcare. But right now, our servicemembers at Fort Drum and their families often have to leave base to access the basic maternal healthcare they need. The bottom line is that we need to take better care of our brave military moms,” said Senator Schumer. “The North Country already experiences major shortages when it comes to recruiting OB/GYNs, and we can’t be forcing our military families who sacrifice so much to be stuck without the proper care they need when they move to our community in service to our country. That is why I am proud to have secured a provision in the Senate NDAA to put Fort Drum’s military moms & families’ first. This is a massive step in the right direction, and we need DoD to immediately address this urgent need to expand OB/GYN care at military installations and make sure families—both at Fort Drum and around the country—have what they need to be safe and healthy. Fort Drum is woven in the very fabric of the North Country, and our military families, military moms and those on the base deserve only the best when it comes to health care.”

    Fort Drum has a history of relying on the civilian healthcare network for primary health care, as well as specialty care provided by OB/GYNs. When Camp Drum became Fort Drum in 1974, the decision was made to not build a hospital on-post, and to instead only have a clinic, in order to integrate Fort Drum families with the local network in Watertown.

    Shortages of OB/GYN providers on base force those in need of maternal health care to seek care in the community for a multitude of reasons, which can range in urgency from routine check-ups to emergency childbirth. Samaritan Medical Center and Carthage Area Hospital serve Fort Drum soldiers and families with incredible dedication and top-notch medical care, but when their OB/GYNs are spread too thin, soldiers and families must travel over an hour and a half to Syracuse or farther for care. Schumer said this not only increases the risk to patients unnecessarily, but it also saddles soldiers with expenses that they are not eligible to be compensated for under the Department of Defense’s Joint Travel Regulation (JTR).

    To help fix the situation, Schumer proudly pushed for and successfully secured language in the Senate version of the NDAA to develop a plan & study the administrative and cost barriers to expanding OB/GYN care specifically in the Watertown area and to create a comprehensive plan to expand OB/GYN care serving Fort Drum. The provision also directs the Secretary of Defense to brief Congress on the plan December 1 of this year to ensure that there is no more delay in providing the Fort Drum community with reliable, high-quality maternal health care close to home.

    Schumer said the shortage of OB/GYNs at Fort Drum is part of a nationwide shortage, with particularly low access in rural areas. OB/GYNs have one of the highest attrition rates compared to most medical professions, and increased threats to OB/GYN safety driven by anti-abortion politics. Labor and delivery units, especially in rural areas, are currently closing nationwide due to low reimbursement, and with Medicaid paying for more than 40% of births across the country, even more L&D units are at risk. The recent GOP cuts to Medicaid – the largest in history – will force more units in rural parts of the country to close. This will exacerbate the already dire situation of limited access to critical OB/GYN care for those living on bases in rural America.

    Erika Flint, Executive Director, Fort Drum Regional Health Planning Organization, said “Ensuring access to high-quality OBGYN care for military members and their families continues to be a key focus for the local healthcare community. Maintaining this standard of care—locally and consistently—reflects a deep commitment to the well-being of those who serve. We appreciate the support and attention given to this issue by Senator Schumer, which affects our North Country families, both civilian and military alike.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Update 15: Alberta wildfire update (July 22, 3 p.m.)

    Source: Government of Canada regional news (2)

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: FS Bancorp, Inc. Reports Second Quarter Net Income of $7.7 Million or $0.99 Per Diluted Share and Declares 50th Consecutive Quarterly Cash Dividend in Addition to a Special Dividend 

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, Wash., July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — FS Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSBW) (the “Company”), the holding company for 1st Security Bank of Washington (the “Bank”) today reported 2025 second quarter net income of $7.7 million, or $0.99 per diluted share, compared to $9.0 million, or $1.13 per diluted share, for the comparable quarter one year ago. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, net income was $15.7 million, or $1.99 per diluted share, compared to net income of $17.4 million, or $2.20 per diluted share, for the comparable six-month period in 2024.

    “We are proud of the balance sheet growth this quarter driven by solid loan demand. Additionally, our share repurchase activity reflects our continued confidence and commitment to delivering long-term value to our shareholders,” stated Phillip Whittington, CFO.

    “We are pleased to announce that our Board of Directors has approved our 50th consecutive quarterly cash dividend of $0.28 per common share, demonstrating our continued commitment to delivering value to our shareholders. In recognition of this milestone, the Board also approved a special dividend of $0.22 per common share. Both dividends will be paid on August 21, 2025, to shareholders of record as of August 7, 2025,” noted Matthew Mullet, President.

    2025 Second Quarter Highlights

    • Net income was $7.7 million for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $8.0 million for the previous quarter, and $9.0 million for the comparable quarter one year ago;
    • Total deposits decreased $61.8 million, or 2.4%, to $2.55 billion at June 30, 2025, primarily due to a decrease of $59.1 million in brokered deposits, compared to $2.62 billion at March 31, 2025, and increased $170.6 million, or 7.2%, from $2.38 billion at June 30, 2024.  Noninterest-bearing deposits were $654.1 million at June 30, 2025, $676.7 million at March 31, 2025, and $623.3 million at June 30, 2024;
    • Borrowings increased $165.5 million, or 240.5% to $234.3 million at June 30, 2025, compared to $68.8 million at March 31, 2025, and increased $52.4 million, or 28.8%, from $181.9 million at June 30, 2024;
    • Loans receivable, net increased $81.2 million, or 3.2%, to $2.58 billion at June 30, 2025, compared to $2.50 billion at March 31, 2025, and increased $125.1 million, or 5.1%, from $2.46 billion at June 30, 2024;
    • Consumer loans were $606.3 million at June 30, 2025, a decrease of $2.6 million, or 0.4%, from $608.9 million in the previous quarter, and a decrease of $35.4 million, or 5.5%, from $641.7 million in the comparable quarter one year ago. During the three months ended June 30, 2025, consumer loan originations included 82.5% of home improvement loans originated with a Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”) score above 720;
    • Repurchased 132,282 shares of the Company’s common stock in the second quarter of 2025 at an average price of $38.92 per share with $725,000 remaining for future purchases under the existing share repurchase plan at June 30, 2025. In addition, as previously announced on July 9, 2025, the Board approved a new share repurchase plan authorizing the repurchase of up to $5.0 million in shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock;
    • Book value per share increased $0.43 to $39.55 at June 30, 2025, compared to $39.12 at March 31, 2025, and increased $2.40 from $37.15 at June 30, 2024.  Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP financial measure) increased $0.50 to $37.46 at June 30, 2025, compared to $36.96 at March 31, 2025, and increased $2.80 from $34.66 at June 30, 2024. See, “Non-GAAP Financial Measures;”
    • Segment reporting in the second quarter of 2025 reflected net income of $7.4 million for the Commercial and Consumer Banking segment and $351,000 for the Home Lending segment, compared to net income of $7.8 million and $242,000 in the prior quarter, and net income of $8.0 million and $1.0 million in the second quarter of 2024, respectively; and
    • Regulatory capital ratios at the Bank were 14.1% for total risk-based capital and 11.2% for Tier 1 leverage capital at June 30, 2025, compared to 14.4% for total risk-based capital and 11.3% for Tier 1 leverage capital at March 31, 2025.

    Segment Reporting

    The Company operates through two reportable segments: Commercial and Consumer Banking and Home Lending. The Commercial and Consumer Banking segment provides diversified financial products and services to our commercial and consumer customers. These products and services include deposit products; residential, consumer, business and commercial real estate lending and cash management services. This segment also manages the Bank’s investment portfolio and other assets. The Home Lending segment originates one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans primarily for sale in the secondary markets as well as loans held for investment.

    The tables below provide a summary of segment reporting at or for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 (dollars in thousands):

        At or For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2025  
    Condensed income statement:   Commercial and Consumer Banking     Home Lending     Total  
    Net interest income(1)   $ 29,179     $ 2,933     $ 32,112  
    Provision for credit losses     (1,849 )     (172 )     (2,021 )
    Noninterest income(2)     2,297       2,873       5,170  
    Noninterest expense(3)     (20,313 )     (5,189 )     (25,502 )
    Income before provision for income taxes     9,314       445       9,759  
    Provision for income taxes     (1,937 )     (94 )     (2,031 )
    Net income   $ 7,377     $ 351     $ 7,728  
    Total average assets for period ended   $ 2,466,917     $ 649,443     $ 3,116,360  
    Full-time employees (“FTEs”)     452       115       567  
        At or Three Months Ended June 30, 2024
    Condensed income statement:   Commercial and Consumer Banking   Home Lending   Total
    Net interest income(1)   $ 28,051     $ 2,350     $ 30,401  
    (Provision) recovery for credit losses     (1,214 )     137       (1,077 )
    Noninterest income(2)     2,269       3,599       5,868  
    Noninterest expense(3)     (19,043 )     (4,814 )     (23,857 )
    Income before provision for income taxes     10,063       1,272       11,335  
    Provision for income taxes     (2,113 )     (263 )     (2,376 )
    Net income   $ 7,950     $ 1,009     $ 8,959  
    Total average assets for period ended   $ 2,359,741     $ 588,090     $ 2,947,831  
    FTEs     450       121       571  
        At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025  
    Condensed income statement:   Commercial and Consumer Banking     Home Lending     Total  
    Net interest income(1)   $ 57,586     $ 5,507     $ 63,093  
    Provision for credit losses     (3,170 )     (443 )     (3,613 )
    Noninterest income(2)     4,542       5,754       10,296  
    Noninterest expense(3)     (40,489 )     (10,067 )     (50,556 )
    Income before provision for income taxes     18,469       751       19,220  
    Provision for income taxes     (3,314 )     (157 )     (3,471 )
    Net income   $ 15,155     $ 594     $ 15,749  
    Total average assets for period ended   $ 2,440,654     $ 634,013     $ 3,074,667  
    FTEs     452       115       567  
        At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2024  
    Condensed income statement:   Commercial and Consumer Banking     Home Lending     Total  
    Net interest income(1)   $ 56,137     $ 4,610     $ 60,747  
    Provision for credit losses     (2,465 )     (11 )     (2,476 )
    Noninterest income(2)     4,662       6,317       10,979  
    Noninterest expense(3)     (38,051 )     (9,335 )     (47,386 )
    Income before provision for income taxes     20,283       1,581       21,864  
    Provision for income taxes     (4,182 )     (326 )     (4,508 )
    Net income   $ 16,101     $ 1,255     $ 17,356  
    Total average assets for period ended   $ 2,380,803     $ 572,386     $ 2,953,189  
    FTEs     450       121       571  

    __________________________

    (1)   Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on assets and the cost of liabilities to fund those assets. Interest earned includes actual interest earned on segment assets and, if the segment has excess liabilities, interest credits for providing funding to the other segment. The cost of liabilities includes interest expense on segment liabilities and, if the segment does not have enough liabilities to fund its assets, a funding charge based on the cost of assigned liabilities to fund segment assets.
    (2)   Noninterest income includes activity from certain residential mortgage loans that were initially originated for sale and measured at fair value and subsequently transferred to loans held for investment. Gains and losses from changes in fair value for these loans are reported in earnings as a component of noninterest income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company recorded a net increase in fair value of $3,000 and $266,000, respectively, compared to a net increase in fair value of $184,000 and $186,000, respectively for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024. As of June 30, 2025 and 2024, there were $13.2 million and $13.9 million, respectively, in residential mortgage loans recorded at fair value as they were previously transferred from loans held for sale to loans held for investment.
    (3)   Noninterest expense includes allocated overhead expense from general corporate activities. Allocation is determined based on a combination of segment assets and FTEs.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, the Home Lending segment included allocated overhead expenses of $1.8 million and $3.7 million, compared to $1.5 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
         

    Asset Summary

    The following table presents the components and changes in total assets as of the dates indicated.

    ASSETS                           Linked Quarter     Prior Year  
    (Dollars in thousands)   June 30,     March 31,     June 30,     Change     Quarter Change  
        2025     2025     2024     $     %     $     %  
    Cash and due from banks   $ 15,168     $ 18,657     $ 20,005     $ (3,489 )     (19 )%   $ (4,837 )     (24 )%
    Interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions     18,027       44,084       13,006       (26,057 )     (59 )     5,021       39  
    Total cash and cash equivalents     33,195       62,741       33,011       (29,546 )     (47 )     184       1  
    Certificates of deposit at other financial institutions     248       1,234       12,707       (986 )     (80 )     (12,459 )     (98 )
    Securities available-for-sale, at fair value     302,692       291,133       221,182       11,559       4       81,510       37  
    Securities held-to-maturity, net     31,562       10,434       8,455       21,128       202       23,107       273  
    Loans held for sale, at fair value     53,630       31,038       53,811       22,592       73       (181 )     —  
    Loans receivable, net     2,582,272       2,501,117       2,457,184       81,155       3       125,088       5  
    Accrued interest receivable     14,270       14,406       13,792       (136 )     (1 )     478       3  
    Premises and equipment, net     30,098       29,451       29,999       647       2       99       —  
    Operating lease right-of-use     7,969       4,979       5,784       2,990       60       2,185       38  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost     11,579       5,256       10,322       6,323       120       1,257       12  
    Deferred tax asset, net     7,782       7,009       4,590       773       11       3,192       70  
    Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”), net     38,262       38,778       38,201       (516 )     (1 )     61       —  
    MSRs, held at the lower of cost or fair value     8,652       8,926       9,352       (274 )     (3 )     (700 )     (7 )
    Goodwill     3,592       3,592       3,592       —       —       —       —  
    Core deposit intangible, net     12,071       12,879       15,483       (808 )     (6 )     (3,412 )     (22 )
    Other assets     38,139       43,105       23,912       (4,966 )     (12 )     14,227       59  
    TOTAL ASSETS   $ 3,176,013     $ 3,066,078     $ 2,941,377     $ 109,935       4 %   $ 234,636       8 %
                                                             

    The increase in total assets reflects the Company’s continued focus on balance sheet growth through loan origination and selective investment activity, funded by a combination of on-balance sheet liquidity and borrowings.

                                                                Prior  
    LOAN PORTFOLIO                                                   Linked     Year  
    (Dollars in thousands)                                                   Quarter     Quarter  
    COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE   June 30, 2025     March 31, 2025     June 30, 2024     $     $  
    (“CRE”) LOANS   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     Change     Change  
    CRE owner occupied   $ 180,250       6.8 %   $ 164,911       6.5 %   $ 177,723       7.1 %   $ 15,339     $ 2,527  
    CRE non-owner occupied     171,979       6.6       174,188       6.9       181,681       7.3       (2,209 )     (9,702 )
    Commercial and speculative construction and development     300,723       11.5       288,978       11.4       220,793       8.9       11,745       79,930  
    Multi-family     263,185       10.1       244,940       9.7       239,675       9.6       18,245       23,510  
    Total CRE loans     916,137       35.0       873,017       34.5       819,872       32.9       43,120       96,265  
                                                                     
    RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS                                                                
    One-to-four-family (excludes HFS)     639,881       24.4       637,299       25.2       588,966       23.7       2,582       50,915  
    Home equity     85,613       3.3       73,846       2.9       73,749       3.0       11,767       11,864  
    Residential custom construction     54,024       2.1       48,810       1.9       53,416       2.1       5,214       608  
    Total residential real estate loans     779,518       29.8       759,955       30.0       716,131       28.8       19,563       63,387  
                                                                     
    CONSUMER LOANS                                                                
    Indirect home improvement     530,375       20.3       532,038       21.0       563,621       22.6       (1,663 )     (33,246 )
    Marine     72,765       2.8       73,737       2.9       74,627       3.0       (972 )     (1,862 )
    Other consumer     3,151       0.1       3,118       0.1       3,440       0.1       33       (289 )
    Total consumer loans     606,291       23.2       608,893       24.0       641,688       25.7       (2,602 )     (35,397 )
                                                                     
    COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOANS                                                                
    Commercial and industrial (“C&I”)     294,563       11.3       274,956       10.9       285,183       11.6       19,607       9,380  
    Warehouse lending     17,952       0.7       15,949       0.6       25,548       1.0       2,003       (7,596 )
    Total commercial business loans     312,515       12.0       290,905       11.5       310,731       12.6       21,610       1,784  
    Total loans receivable, gross     2,614,461       100.0 %     2,532,770       100.0 %     2,488,422       100.0 %     81,691       126,039  
                                                                     
    Allowance for credit losses on loans     (32,189 )             (31,653 )             (31,238 )             (536 )     (951 )
    Total loans receivable, net   $ 2,582,272             $ 2,501,117             $ 2,457,184             $ 81,155     $ 125,088  
                                                                     

    The composition of CRE loans at the dates indicated were as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)   June 30, 2025     March 31, 2025     June 30, 2024  
    CRE by Type:   Amount     Amount     Amount  
    CRE non-owner occupied:                        
    Office   $ 39,141     $ 39,406     $ 41,380  
    Retail     38,652       35,520       37,507  
    Hospitality/restaurant     26,489       27,377       28,314  
    Self-storage     19,075       19,092       19,141  
    Mixed use     18,387       18,868       18,062  
    Industrial     14,444       15,033       17,163  
    Senior housing/assisted living     7,448       7,506       7,675  
    Other     3,670       6,579       6,847  
    Land     2,206       2,314       3,021  
    Education/worship     2,467       2,493       2,571  
    Total CRE non-owner occupied     171,979       174,188       181,681  
    CRE owner occupied:                        
    Industrial     77,419       66,618       63,970  
    Office     40,156       40,447       41,978  
    Retail     19,470       20,535       20,885  
    Other     9,483       8,529       8,354  
    Hospitality/restaurant     7,230       7,306       10,800  
    Automobile related     7,215       7,266       8,200  
    Mixed use     5,548       5,579       5,680  
    Agriculture     4,652       3,990       3,639  
    Education/worship     4,630       4,641       4,610  
    Car wash     4,447       —       9,607  
    Total CRE owner occupied     180,250       164,911       177,723  
    Total   $ 352,229     $ 339,099     $ 359,404  
                             

    The following table includes CRE loans repricing or maturing within the next two years, excluding loans that reprice simultaneously with changes to the prime rate:

                                                              Current
    (Dollars in                                                         Weighted
    thousands)   For the Quarter Ended       Average
    CRE by type:   Sep 30, 2025   Dec 31, 2025   Mar 31, 2026   Jun 30, 2026   Sep 30, 2026   Dec 31, 2026   Mar 31, 2027   Jun 30, 2027   Total   Rate
    Agriculture   $ 716   $ 314   $ 178   $ 265   $ 287   $ —   $ —   $ —   $ 1,760   6.28 %
    Apartment     —     13,679     1,128     13,788     9,747     7,062     4,117     —     49,521   4.96 %
    Hotel / hospitality     2,393     —     113     1,243     —     —     103     —     3,852   5.26 %
    Industrial     —     10,002     976     586     1,578     —     13,412     263     26,817   5.12 %
    Mixed use     241     —     7,101     —     —     379     —     —     7,721   8.14 %
    Office     15,015     6,055     515     1,629     554     7,695     2,857     1,213     35,533   5.50 %
    Other     1,921     240     884     —     —     1,485     —     3,515     8,045   4.80 %
    Retail     1,020     —     421     3,448     —     3,399     3,027     2,801     14,116   4.26 %
    Education/worship     1,314     —     —     —     2,467     —     —     —     3,781   5.18 %
    Senior housing and assisted living     —     —     2,142     —     —     —     —     1,372     3,514   4.76 %
    Total   $ 22,620   $ 30,290   $ 13,458   $ 20,959   $ 14,633   $ 20,020   $ 23,516   $ 9,164   $ 154,660   5.22 %
                                                                 

    The composition of construction loans at the dates indicated were as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)   June 30, 2025     March 31, 2025     June 30, 2024  
    Construction Types:   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent  
    Commercial construction – retail   $ 8,447       2.4 %   $ 8,157       2.4 %   $ 8,698       3.2 %
    Commercial construction – office     9,083       2.6       6,487       1.9       4,737       1.7  
    Commercial construction – self storage     16,553       4.7       16,012       4.7       10,000       3.6  
    Commercial construction – hotel     3,673       1.0       402       0.1       7,807       2.8  
    Multi-family     23,119       6.5       31,275       9.3       30,960       11.3  
    Custom construction – single family residential and single family manufactured residential     45,570       12.8       41,143       12.2       46,106       16.8  
    Custom construction – land, lot and acquisition and development     8,454       2.4       7,667       2.3       7,310       2.7  
    Speculative residential construction – vertical     200,375       56.5       186,042       55.1       131,294       47.9  
    Speculative residential construction – land, lot and acquisition and development     39,473       11.1       40,603       12.0       27,297       10.0  
    Total   $ 354,747       100.0 %   $ 337,788       100.0 %   $ 274,209       100.0 %
                                                     

    Originations of one-to-four-family loans to purchase and refinance a home for the periods indicated were as follows:

    (Dollars in                                                 Prior Year  
    thousands)   For the Three Months Ended     Linked Quarter   Quarter  
        June 30, 2025     March 31, 2025     June 30, 2024     $   %   $     %  
        Amount   Percent     Amount   Percent     Amount   Percent     Change   Change   Change     Change  
    Purchase   $ 170,854   85.7 %   $ 120,719   83.0 %   $ 193,715   92.3 %   $ 50,135   41.5   $ (22,861 )   (11.8 )%
    Refinance     28,470   14.3       24,677   17.0       16,173   7.7       3,793   15.4     12,297     76.0 %
    Total   $ 199,324   100.0 %   $ 145,396   100.0 %   $ 209,888   100.0 %   $ 53,928   37.1   $ (10,564 )   (5.0 )%
    (Dollars in thousands)   For the Six Months Ended June 30,            
        2025     2024            
        Amount   Percent     Amount   Percent     $ Change   % Change  
    Purchase   $ 290,737   84.3 %   $ 329,292   90.5 %   $ (38,555 )   (11.7 ) %
    Refinance     53,983   15.7       34,545   9.5       19,438     56.3   %
    Total   $ 344,720   100.0 %   $ 363,837   100.0 %   $ (19,117 )   (5.3 ) %
                                             

    During the quarter ended June 30, 2025, the Company sold $127.1 million of one-to-four-family loans compared to $91.9 million during the previous quarter and $164.5 million during the same quarter one year ago. The increase in the volume of loans sold during the current quarter compared to the prior quarter was primarily due to seasonal factors, including the spring homebuying season. This increased demand for homes generally results in a higher volume of loan originations and, consequently, more loans available for sale. Gross margins on home loan sales decreased to 3.06% for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to 3.26% in the previous quarter and increased from 2.96% in the same quarter one year ago. Gross margins are defined as the margin on loans sold (cash sales) without the impact of deferred costs.

    Liabilities and Equity Summary

    The following table summarizes the components and changes in deposits, borrowings, equity, and book value per common share at the dates indicated.

    (Dollars in thousands)                                                   Linked     Prior Year  
    Deposits   June 30, 2025     March 31, 2025     June 30, 2024     Quarter     Quarter  
    Transactional deposits:   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     $ Change     $ Change  
    Noninterest-bearing checking   $ 643,573       25.2 %   $ 659,417       25.2 %   $ 613,137       25.7 %   $ (15,844 )   $ 30,436  
    Interest-bearing checking:                                                                
    Retail deposits     181,240       7.1       171,396       6.6       166,839       7.0       9,844       14,401  
    Brokered deposits     30,020       1.2       30,073       1.1       —       —       (53 )     30,020  
    Total interest-bearing checking     211,260       8.3       201,469       7.7       166,839       7.0       9,791       44,421  
    Escrow accounts related to mortgages serviced(1)     10,496       0.4       17,289       0.7       10,212       0.4       (6,793 )     284  
    Subtotal     865,329       33.9       878,175       33.6       790,188       33.1       (12,846 )     75,141  
    Savings and money market:                                                                
    Savings     159,601       6.3       160,332       6.1       151,398       6.4       (731 )     8,203  
    Money market:                                                                
    Retail deposits     350,548       13.6       343,098       13.1       339,946       14.2       7,450       10,602  
    Brokered deposits     251       0.1       251       —       4,049       0.2       —       (3,798 )
    Total money market     350,799       13.7       343,349       13.1       343,995       14.4       7,450       6,804  
    Subtotal     510,400       20.0       503,681       19.2       495,393       20.8       6,719       15,007  
    Certificates of deposit:                                                                
    Retail CDs     891,355       34.9       881,630       33.7       823,866       34.6       9,725       67,489  
    Nonretail CDs:                                                                
    Online CDs     3,423       0.1       9,354       0.4       9,354       0.4       (5,931 )     (5,931 )
    Public CDs     2,114       0.1       2,440       0.1       2,983       0.1       (326 )     (869 )
    Brokered CDs     280,754       11.0       339,871       13.0       261,019       11.0       (59,117 )     19,735  
    Total nonretail CDs     286,291       11.2       351,665       13.5       273,356       11.5       (65,374 )     12,935  
    Subtotal     1,177,646       46.1       1,233,295       47.2       1,097,222       46.1       (55,649 )     80,424  
    Total deposits   $ 2,553,375       100.0 %   $ 2,615,151       100.0 %   $ 2,382,803       100.0 %   $ (61,776 )   $ 170,572  
    Borrowings(2)   $ 234,305             $ 68,805             $ 181,895             $ 165,500     $ 52,410  
    Equity   $ 297,203             $ 298,840             $ 284,026             $ (1,637 )   $ 13,177  
    Book value per common share   $ 39.55             $ 39.12             $ 37.15             $ 0.43     $ 2.40  

    __________________________

    (1)   Primarily noninterest-bearing accounts based on applicable state law.
    (2)   Comprised of FHLB advances and Federal Reserve Bank borrowings.
         

    At June 30, 2025, the Bank had uninsured deposits of approximately $677.2 million, compared to approximately $679.4 million at March 31, 2025, and $586.6 million at June 30, 2024.  The uninsured amounts are estimates based on the methodologies and assumptions used for the Bank’s regulatory reporting requirements.

    In reference to the table above, the linked quarter decrease in stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2025, compared to March 31, 2025, was primarily due to share repurchases of $5.1 million, cash dividends paid of $2.1 million, and $525,000 in equity award compensation, partially offset by net income of $7.7 million. Stockholders’ equity was also impacted by a decline in unrealized fair value on securities available for sale of $1.2 million, net of tax, and fair value and cash flow hedges of $1.6 million, net of tax, reflecting changes in market interest rates during the quarter, resulting in a $2.8 million decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax.

    The Bank is considered “well capitalized” under the capital requirement established by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Company exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. At June 30, 2025, capital ratios presented for the Bank and the Company were as follows:

        At June 30, 2025
        Bank   Company
    Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)   14.07 %   14.16 %
    Tier 1 leverage capital (to average assets)   11.18 %   9.65 %
    CET 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)   12.82 %   11.07 %
                 

    Credit Quality

    The following table summarizes the changes in the ACL on loans, nonperforming loans, and substandard loans at the dates indicated.

    ACL ON LOANS   June 30,     March 31,     June 30,     Linked     Prior Year  
    (Dollars in thousands)   2025     2025     2024     Quarter     Quarter  
        Amount     Amount     Amount     $ Change     $ Change  
    Beginning ACL balance   $ (31,653 )   $ (31,870 )   $ (31,479 )   $ 217     $ (174 )
    Provision     (1,715 )     (1,505 )     (1,001 )     (210 )     (714 )
    Charge-offs                                        
    Indirect     1,555       1,579       825       (24 )     730  
    Marine     43       20       157       23       (114 )
    Other     42       37       33       5       9  
    Commercial business     —       433       733       (433 )     (733 )
    Subtotal     1,640       2,069       1,748       (429 )     (108 )
    Recoveries                                        
    Indirect     (330 )     (340 )     (307 )     10       (23 )
    Marine     (54 )     (3 )     (110 )     (51 )     56  
    Other     (7 )     (4 )     (4 )     (3 )     (3 )
    Commercial business     (70 )     —       (85 )     (70 )     15  
    Subtotal     (461 )     (347 )     (506 )     (114 )     45  
    Ending ACL balance   $ (32,189 )   $ (31,653 )   $ (31,238 )   $ (536 )   $ (951 )
    NONPERFORMING LOANS   June 30,   March 31,   June 30,   Linked   Prior Year
    (Dollars in thousands)   2025   2025   2024   Quarter   Quarter
    CRE LOANS   Amount   Amount   Amount   $ Change   $ Change
    CRE   $ 2,046   $ 1,196   $ 1,116   $ 850     $ 930  
    Commercial and speculative construction and development     9,083     6,487     4,737     2,596       4,346  
    Total CRE loans     11,129     7,683     5,853     3,446       5,276  
                                   
    RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS                              
    One-to-four-family (excludes HFS)     1,809     1,134     170     675       1,639  
    Home equity     251     252     156     (1 )     95  
    Total residential real estate loans     2,060     1,386     326     674       1,734  
                                   
    CONSUMER LOANS                              
    Indirect home improvement     3,365     2,821     2,319     544       1,046  
    Marine     567     648     327     (81 )     240  
    Other consumer     13     1     6     12       7  
    Total consumer loans     3,945     3,470     2,652     475       1,293  
                                   
    COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOANS                              
    C&I     1,862     1,932     2,575     (70 )     (713 )
    Total nonperforming loans   $ 18,996   $ 14,471   $ 11,406   $ 4,525     $ 7,590  
                                       

    The increase in nonaccrual loans during the period was partly driven by a single commercial construction loan, which remains in active development. Ongoing construction disbursements on this loan contributed to a $2.6 million increase from the prior quarter and a $4.3 million increase compared to the same period last year. Increases in consumer loan delinquencies also contributed to the overall rise in nonaccrual loans between the periods. 

    CRITICIZED LOANS   June 30,   March 31,   June 30,   Linked   Prior Year
    (Dollars in thousands)   2025   2025   2024   Quarter   Quarter
    CRE LOANS   Amount   Amount   Amount   $ Change   $ Change
    CRE   $ 2,046   $ 2,040   $ 3,926   $ 6     $ (1,880 )
    Commercial and speculative construction and development     9,083     6,487     4,737     2,596       4,346  
    Total CRE loans     11,129     8,527     8,663     2,602       2,466  
                                   
    RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS                              
    One-to-four-family (excludes HFS)     4,383     3,728     2,854     655       1,529  
    Home equity     251     252     156     (1 )     95  
    Total residential real estate loans     4,634     3,980     3,010     654       1,624  
                                   
    CONSUMER LOANS                              
    Indirect home improvement     3,365     2,821     2,319     544       1,046  
    Marine     567     649     327     (82 )     240  
    Other consumer     13     1     6     12       7  
    Total consumer loans     3,945     3,471     2,652     474       1,293  
                                   
    COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOANS                              
    C&I     5,220     7,524     9,954     (2,304 )     (4,734 )
    Total criticized loans   $ 24,928   $ 23,502   $ 24,279   $ 1,426     $ 649  
                                       

    Operating Results

    Net interest income increased $1.7 million to $32.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, from $30.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024, primarily due to an increase in total interest income of $2.8 million, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $1.1 million. The $2.8 million increase in total interest income was primarily due to an increase of $2.6 million in interest income on loans receivable, including fees, primarily as a result of net loan growth. The $1.1 million increase in total interest expense was primarily the result of higher average balances of deposits and borrowings to fund asset growth.

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025, net interest income increased $2.3 million to $63.1 million, from $60.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024, with a $4.7 million increase in total interest income, partially offset by a $2.3 million increase in interest expense for the same reasons mentioned above. 

    NIM (annualized) increased one basis point to 4.30% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, from 4.29% for the same period in the prior year and increased four basis points from 4.27% to 4.31% for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The change in NIM for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024, reflects the increased yields on interest-earning assets, as a result of loan growth and repricing activity. The improvement also reflects a favorable shift in the asset mix and disciplined management of deposit and funding costs. 

    The average total cost of funds, including noninterest-bearing checking, increased one basis point to 2.39% for the three months ended June 30, 2025, from 2.38% for the three months ended June 30, 2024. This increase was predominantly due to higher average balances in borrowings. The average cost of funds increased eight basis points to 2.38% for the six months ended June 30, 2025, from 2.30% for the six months ended June 30, 2024, primarily for the same reason noted above as well as growth in the deposit mix from the prior year. 

    For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, the provision for credit losses on loans was $2.0 million and $3.6 million, compared to $1.1 million and $2.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, respectively. The provision for credit losses on loans reflects net loan growth and an increase in net charge-off activity.

    During the three months ended June 30, 2025, net charge-offs decreased $63,000 to $1.2 million, compared to the same period the prior year. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, net charge-offs increased $184,000, to $2.9 million, compared to $2.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2024. The increase was primarily due to a $1.2 million increase in net charge-offs on indirect home improvement loans, partially offset by a $693,000 decrease in net charge-offs on commercial business loans and a $271,000 decrease in net charge-offs on marine loans. Management attributes the increase in net charge-offs for the current six month period to continued volatile economic conditions.

    Total noninterest income decreased $698,000 to $5.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, from $5.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024. The decrease primarily reflects a $491,000 decrease in gain on sale of loans, primarily due to a decrease of loans available for sale, a $156,000 decrease in service charges and fee income and a $151,000 decrease in gain on sale of investment securities due to no sales activity in the current quarter compared to the same period last year. Total noninterest income decreased $683,000, to $10.3 million, for the six months ended June 30, 2025, from $11.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. This decrease was primarily the result of a $629,000 decrease in gain on sale of loans, a $464,000 decrease in service charges and fee income, and a net decrease of $368,000 from no activity in gain on sales of MSRs and loss on sale of investment securities compared to an $8.2 million net gain on sale of MSRs, offset by the $7.8 million loss on sale of investment securities that occurred in the first half of 2024. These decreases in total noninterest income were partially offset by a $755,000 increase in other noninterest income as result of sales of nonmarketable equity securities at a $312,000 gain, bank owned life insurance proceeds of $195,000, and a $101,000 increase in brokered loans fees.

    Total noninterest expense was $25.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $23.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2024.  The $1.6 million increase was primarily due to a $710,000 increase in salaries and benefits, primarily due to competitive wage adjustments, a $305,000 increase in operations expense, and a $267,000 increase in professional and board fees.  Total noninterest expense increased $3.2 million to $50.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to $47.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2024. Increases during the six month period ended June 30, 2025, compared to the same period last year included $1.7 million in salaries and benefits, $742,000 in operations expense, and $531,000 in professional and board fees.

    About FS Bancorp

    FS Bancorp, Inc., a Washington corporation, is the holding company for 1st Security Bank of Washington. The Bank offers a range of loan and deposit services primarily to small- and middle-market businesses and individuals in Washington and Oregon.  It operates through 27 bank branches, one headquarters office that provides loans and deposit services, and loan production offices in various suburban communities in the greater Puget Sound area, the Kennewick-Pasco-Richland metropolitan area of Washington, also known as the Tri-Cities, and in Vancouver, Washington. Additionally, the Bank services home mortgage customers across the Northwest, focusing on markets in Washington State including the Puget Sound, Tri-Cities, and Vancouver.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    When used in this press release and in other documents filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), in press releases or other public stockholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases “believe,” “will,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project,” “plans,” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but instead represent management’s current expectations and forecasts regarding future events, many of which are inherently uncertain and outside of our control. Actual results may differ, possibly materially from those currently expected or projected in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, include but are not limited to, the following: adverse impacts to economic conditions in the Company’s local market areas, other markets where the Company has lending relationships, or other aspects of the Company’s business operations or financial markets, including, without limitation, as a result of employment levels; labor shortages, the effects of inflation, recessionary pressures or slowing economic growth; changes in interest rates and the duration of such changes, including actions by the Federal Reserve, which could adversely affect our revenues and expenses, the values of our assets and obligations, and the availability and cost of capital and liquidity; the impact of inflation and monetary and fiscal policy responses thereto and their impact on consumer and business behavior; geopolitical developments and international conflicts including but not limited to tensions or instability in Eastern Europe, the Middle east, and Asia, or the imposition of new or increased tariffs and trade restrictions, which may disrupt financial markets, global supply chains, energy prices, or economic activity in specific industry sectors; the effects of a federal government shutdown, debt ceiling standoff, or other fiscal policy uncertainty; increased competitive pressures, including repricing and competitors’ pricing initiatives, and their impact on our market position, loan, and deposit products; adverse changes in the securities markets, the Company’s ability to execute its plans to grow its residential construction lending, mortgage banking, and warehouse lending operations, and the geographic expansion of its indirect home improvement lending; challenges arising from expanding into new geographic markets, products, or services; secondary market conditions for loans and the Company’s ability to originate loans for sale and sell loans in the secondary market; volatility in the mortgage industry; fluctuations in deposits; liquidity issues, including our ability to borrow funds or raise additional capital, if necessary; the impact of bank failures or adverse developments at other banks and related negative press about the banking industry in general on investor and depositor sentiment; the ability to adapt to rapid technological changes, including advancements in artificial intelligence, digital banking, and cybersecurity; legislation or regulatory changes, including but not limited to shifts in capital requirements, banking regulation, tax laws, or consumer protection laws; vulnerabilities  in information systems or third-party service providers, including disruptions, breaches, or attacks; environmental, social and governance goals; the effects of climate change, severe weather events, natural disasters, pandemics, epidemics and other public health crises, acts of war or terrorism, domestic political unrest and other external events on our business; and other factors described in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and other reports filed with or furnished to the SEC which are available on its website at www.fsbwa.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

    Any of the forward-looking statements that the Company makes in this press release and in the other public statements are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made and may turn out to be incorrect because of the inaccurate assumptions the Company might make, because of the factors illustrated above or because of other factors that cannot be foreseen by the Company. Therefore, these factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. The Company does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

     
    FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)
                                         
                                Linked     Prior Year  
        June 30,     March 31,     June 30,     Quarter     Quarter  
    ASSETS   2025     2025     2024     % Change     % Change  
    Cash and due from banks   $ 15,168     $ 18,657     $ 20,005       (19 )     (24 )
    Interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions     18,027       44,084       13,006       (59 )     39  
    Total cash and cash equivalents     33,195       62,741       33,011       (47 )     1  
    Certificates of deposit at other financial institutions     248       1,234       12,707       (80 )     (98 )
    Securities available-for-sale, at fair value     302,692       291,133       221,182       4       37  
    Securities held-to-maturity, net     31,562       10,434       8,455       202       273  
    Loans held for sale, at fair value     53,630       31,038       53,811       73       —  
    Loans receivable, net     2,582,272       2,501,117       2,457,184       3       5  
    Accrued interest receivable     14,270       14,406       13,792       (1 )     3  
    Premises and equipment, net     30,098       29,451       29,999       2       —  
    Operating lease right-of-use     7,969       4,979       5,784       60       38  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost     11,579       5,256       10,322       120       12  
    Deferred tax asset, net     7,782       7,009       4,590       11       70  
    Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”), net     38,262       38,778       38,201       (1 )     —  
    MSRs, held at the lower of cost or fair value     8,652       8,926       9,352       (3 )     (7 )
    Goodwill     3,592       3,592       3,592       —       —  
    Core deposit intangible, net     12,071       12,879       15,483       (6 )     (22 )
    Other assets     38,139       43,105       23,912       (12 )     59  
    TOTAL ASSETS   $ 3,176,013     $ 3,066,078     $ 2,941,377       4       8  
    LIABILITIES                                        
    Deposits:                                        
    Noninterest-bearing accounts   $ 654,069     $ 676,706     $ 623,349       (3 )     5  
    Interest-bearing accounts     1,899,306       1,938,445       1,759,454       (2 )     8  
    Total deposits     2,553,375       2,615,151       2,382,803       (2 )     7  
    Borrowings     234,305       68,805       181,895       241       29  
    Subordinated notes:                                        
    Principal amount     50,000       50,000       50,000       —       —  
    Unamortized debt issuance costs     (373 )     (389 )     (439 )     (4 )     (15 )
    Total subordinated notes less unamortized debt issuance costs     49,627       49,611       49,561       —       —  
    Operating lease liability     8,138       5,149       5,979       58       36  
    Other liabilities     33,365       28,522       37,113       17       (10 )
    Total liabilities     2,878,810       2,767,238       2,657,351       4       8  
    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES                                        
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                                        
    Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding     —       —       —       —       —  
    Common stock, $.01 par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized; 7,618,543 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2025, 7,742,907 at March 31, 2025, and 7,742,607 at June 30, 2024     76       77       77       (1 )     (1 )
    Additional paid-in capital     48,418       52,806       55,834       (8 )     (13 )
    Retained earnings     268,509       262,945       243,651       2       10  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax     (19,800 )     (16,988 )     (15,536 )     17       27  
    Total stockholders’ equity     297,203       298,840       284,026       (1 )     5  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 3,176,013     $ 3,066,078     $ 2,941,377       4       8  
                                             
     
    FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)
                       
        Three Months Ended     Linked     Prior Year  
        June 30,     March 31,     June 30,     Quarter     Quarter  
    INTEREST INCOME   2025     2025     2024     % Change     % Change  
    Loans receivable, including fees   $ 45,038     $ 43,303     $ 42,406       4       6  
    Interest and dividends on investment securities, cash and cash equivalents, and certificates of deposit at other financial institutions     3,665       3,485       3,534       5       4  
    Total interest and dividend income     48,703       46,788       45,940       4       6  
    INTEREST EXPENSE                                        
    Deposits     14,520       13,058       13,252       11       10  
    Borrowings     1,585       2,263       1,801       (30 )     (12 )
    Subordinated notes     486       485       486       —       —  
    Total interest expense     16,591       15,806       15,539       5       7  
    NET INTEREST INCOME     32,112       30,982       30,401       4       6  
    PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES     2,021       1,592       1,077       27       88  
    NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES     30,091       29,390       29,324       2       3  
    NONINTEREST INCOME                                        
    Service charges and fee income     2,323       2,244       2,479       4       (6 )
    Gain on sale of loans     1,972       1,700       2,463       16       (20 )
    Gain on sale of investment securities, net     —       —       151       NM       NM  
    Earnings on cash surrender value of BOLI     254       250       242       2       5  
    Other noninterest income     621       932       533       (33 )     17  
    Total noninterest income     5,170       5,126       5,868       1       (12 )
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE                                        
    Salaries and benefits     14,088       14,533       13,378       (3 )     5  
    Operations     3,824       3,445       3,519       11       9  
    Occupancy     1,780       1,717       1,669       4       7  
    Data processing     2,137       2,045       2,058       4       4  
    Loan costs     719       548       653       31       10  
    Professional and board fees     1,155       1,186       888       (3 )     30  
    FDIC insurance     554       538       450       3       23  
    Marketing and advertising     398       221       377       80       6  
    Amortization of core deposit intangible     809       831       919       (3 )     (12 )
    Impairment (recovery) of servicing rights     38       (9 )     (54 )     (522 )     (170 )
    Total noninterest expense     25,502       25,055       23,857       2       7  
    INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     9,759       9,461       11,335       3       (14 )
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     2,031       1,440       2,376       41       (15 )
    NET INCOME   $ 7,728     $ 8,021     $ 8,959       (4 )     (14 )
    Basic earnings per share   $ 1.00     $ 1.02     $ 1.15       (2 )     (13 )
    Diluted earnings per share   $ 0.99     $ 1.01     $ 1.13       (2 )     (12 )
                                             
     
    FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)
                 
        Six Months Ended     Year  
        June 30,     June 30,     Over Year  
    INTEREST INCOME   2025     2024     % Change  
    Loans receivable, including fees   $ 88,340     $ 83,403       6  
    Interest and dividends on investment securities, cash and cash equivalents, and certificates of deposit at other financial institutions     7,150       7,417       (4 )
    Total interest and dividend income     95,490       90,820       5  
    INTEREST EXPENSE                        
    Deposits     27,578       26,134       6  
    Borrowings     3,848       2,968       30  
    Subordinated note     971       971       —  
    Total interest expense     32,397       30,073       8  
    NET INTEREST INCOME     63,093       60,747       4  
    PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES     3,613       2,476       46  
    NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES     59,480       58,271       2  
    NONINTEREST INCOME                        
    Service charges and fee income     4,567       5,031       (9 )
    Gain on sale of loans     3,672       4,301       (15 )
    Gain on sale of MSRs     —       8,215       NM  
    Loss on sale of investment securities, net     —       (7,847 )     NM  
    Earnings on cash surrender value of BOLI     505       482       5  
    Other noninterest income     1,552       797       95  
    Total noninterest income     10,296       10,979       (6 )
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE                        
    Salaries and benefits     28,621       26,935       6  
    Operations     7,269       6,527       11  
    Occupancy     3,496       3,374       4  
    Data processing     4,182       4,016       4  
    Loan costs     1,267       1,238       2  
    Professional and board fees     2,342       1,811       29  
    FDIC insurance     1,092       982       11  
    Marketing and advertising     619       604       2  
    Amortization of core deposit intangible     1,639       1,860       (12 )
    Impairment of servicing rights     29       39       (26 )
    Total noninterest expense     50,556       47,386       7  
    INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     19,220       21,864       (12 )
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     3,471       4,508       (23 )
    NET INCOME   $ 15,749     $ 17,356       (9 )
    Basic earnings per share   $ 2.02     $ 2.23       (9 )
    Diluted earnings per share   $ 1.99     $ 2.20       (10 )
                             

    KEY FINANCIAL RATIOS AND DATA (Unaudited)

        At or For the Three Months Ended  
        June 30,     March 31,     June 30,  
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS:   2025     2025     2024  
    Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)(1)     0.99 %     1.07 %     1.22 %
    Return on equity (ratio of net income to average total stockholders’ equity)(1)     10.29       10.80       12.72  
    Yield on average interest-earning assets(1)     6.52       6.53       6.48  
    Average total cost of funds(1)     2.39       2.38       2.38  
    Interest rate spread information – average during period     4.13       4.15       4.10  
    Net interest margin(1)     4.30       4.32       4.29  
    Operating expense to average total assets(1)     3.28       3.35       3.26  
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities(1)     140.98       142.94       143.64  
    Efficiency ratio(2)     68.40       69.39       65.78  
    Common equity ratio (ratio of stockholders’ equity to total assets)     9.36       9.75       9.66  
    Tangible common equity ratio(3)     8.91       9.26       9.07  
        For the Six Months Ended  
        June 30,     June 30,  
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS:   2025     2024  
    Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)     1.03 %     1.18 %
    Return on equity (ratio of net income to average total stockholders’ equity)     10.55       12.51  
    Yield on average interest-earning assets     6.52       6.39  
    Average total cost of funds     2.38       2.30  
    Interest rate spread information – average during period     4.14       4.09  
    Net interest margin     4.31       4.27  
    Operating expense to average total assets     3.32       3.23  
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities     141.93       144.07  
    Efficiency ratio(2)     68.89       66.07  
        June 30,     March 31,     June 30,  
    ASSET QUALITY RATIOS AND DATA:   2025     2025     2024  
    Nonperforming assets to total assets at end of period(4)     0.60 %     0.47 %     0.39 %
    Nonperforming loans to total gross loans (excluding loans HFS)(5)     0.73       0.57       0.46  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans to nonperforming loans(5)     168.89       219.08       273.95  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans to total gross loans (excluding loans HFS)     1.23       1.25       1.26  
        At or For the Three Months Ended    
        June 30,       March 31,       June 30,    
    PER COMMON SHARE DATA:   2025       2025       2024    
    Basic earnings per share   $ 1.00       $ 1.02       $ 1.15    
    Diluted earnings per share   $ 0.99       $ 1.01       $ 1.13    
    Weighted average basic shares outstanding     7,580,576         7,695,320         7,688,246    
    Weighted average diluted shares outstanding     7,698,173         7,805,728         7,796,253    
    Common shares outstanding at end of period     7,515,480   (6)     7,639,844   (7)     7,644,463   (8)
    Book value per share using common shares outstanding   $ 39.55       $ 39.12       $ 37.15    
    Tangible book value per share using common shares outstanding(9)   $ 37.46       $ 36.96       $ 34.66    

    __________________________

    (1)   Annualized.
    (2)   Total noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income and total noninterest income.
    (3)   Represents a non-GAAP financial measure.  For a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP financial measure, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
    (4)   Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans (which include nonaccruing loans and accruing loans more than 90 days past due), foreclosed real estate and other repossessed assets.
    (5)   Nonperforming loans consist of nonaccruing loans and accruing loans 90 days or more past due.
    (6)   Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,618,543 at June 30, 2025, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (7)   Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,742,907 at March 31, 2025, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (8)   Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,742,607 at June 30, 2024, less 98,144 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (9)   Tangible book value per share using outstanding common shares excludes intangible assets. This ratio represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
         
    (Dollars in thousands)   For the Three Months Ended June 30,     For the Six Months Ended June 30,     QTR Over QTR     YTD Over YTD  
    Average Balances   2025     2024     2025     2024     $ Change     $ Change  
    Assets                                                
    Loans receivable, net(1)   $ 2,612,959     $ 2,511,326     $ 2,586,598     $ 2,487,964     $ 101,633     $ 98,634  
    Securities available-for-sale, at amortized cost     332,705       283,422       321,622       307,417       49,283       14,205  
    Securities held-to-maturity     21,401       8,500       15,063       8,500       12,901       6,563  
    Interest-bearing deposits and certificates of deposit at other financial institutions     8,775       41,613       10,353       50,563       (32,838 )     (40,210 )
    FHLB stock, at cost     19,502       7,040       17,840       4,607       12,462       13,233  
    Total interest-earning assets     2,995,342       2,851,901       2,951,476       2,859,051       143,441       92,425  
    Noninterest-earning assets     121,018       95,930       123,191       94,138       25,088       29,053  
    Total assets   $ 3,116,360     $ 2,947,831     $ 3,074,667     $ 2,953,189     $ 168,529     $ 121,478  
    Liabilities                                                
    Interest-bearing deposit accounts   $ 1,924,586     $ 1,794,966     $ 1,845,534     $ 1,813,865     $ 129,620     $ 31,669  
    Borrowings     150,492       140,964       184,377       121,057       9,528       63,320  
    Subordinated notes     49,617       49,550       49,608       49,542       67       66  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     2,124,695       1,985,480       2,079,519       1,984,464       139,215       95,055  
    Noninterest-bearing deposit accounts     657,820       637,345       660,805       647,214       20,475       13,591  
    Other noninterest-bearing liabilities     32,700       41,785       33,218       42,516       (9,085 )     (9,298 )
    Total liabilities   $ 2,815,215     $ 2,664,610     $ 2,773,542     $ 2,674,194     $ 150,605     $ 99,348  

    __________________________

    (1)   Includes loans HFS.
         

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures:

    In addition to financial results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles utilized in the United States (“GAAP”), this earnings release presents non-GAAP financial measures that include tangible book value per share, and tangible common equity ratio. Management believes that providing the Company’s tangible book value per share and tangible common equity ratio is consistent with the capital treatment utilized by the investment community, which excludes intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios and facilitates comparison of the quality and composition of the Company’s capital over time and to its competitors. Where applicable, the Company has also presented comparable GAAP information.

    These non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are not audited. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for total stockholders’ equity or operating results determined in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

    Reconciliation of the GAAP book value per share and common equity ratio and the non-GAAP tangible book value per share and tangible common equity ratio is presented below.

    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)   June 30,   March 31,   June 30,  
    Tangible Book Value Per Share:   2025   2025   2024  
    Stockholders’ equity (GAAP)   $ 297,203     $ 298,840     $ 284,026    
    Less: goodwill and core deposit intangible, net     (15,663 )     (16,471 )     (19,075 )  
    Tangible common stockholders’ equity (non-GAAP)   $ 281,540     $ 282,369     $ 264,951    
                         
    Common shares outstanding at end of period     7,515,480   (1)   7,639,844   (2)   7,644,463   (3)
                         
    Book value per share (GAAP)   $ 39.55     $ 39.12     $ 37.15    
    Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)   $ 37.46     $ 36.96     $ 34.66    
                         
    Tangible Common Equity Ratio:                    
    Total assets (GAAP)   $ 3,176,013     $ 3,066,078     $ 2,941,377    
    Less: goodwill and core deposit intangible assets     (15,663 )     (16,471 )     (19,075 )  
    Tangible assets (non-GAAP)   $ 3,160,350     $ 3,049,607     $ 2,922,302    
                         
    Common equity ratio (GAAP)     9.36   %   9.75   %   9.66   %
    Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP)     8.91       9.26       9.07    

    _________________________

    (1)   Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,618,543 at June 30, 2025, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (2)   Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,742,907 at March 31, 2025, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (3)   Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,742,607 at June 30, 2024, less 98,144 unvested restricted stock shares.
         

    Contacts:
    Joseph C. Adams,
    Chief Executive Officer
    Matthew D. Mullet,
    President
    Phillip D. Whittington,
    Chief Financial Officer

    (425) 771-5299
    www.FSBWA.com

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Newhouse Votes for Responsible Land Management, Unleashing Natural Resources

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Dan Newhouse (4th District of Washington)

    Headline: Newhouse Votes for Responsible Land Management, Unleashing Natural Resources

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, Rep. Dan Newhouse (WA-04) released the following statement upon committee passage of the Fiscal Year 2026 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act. 

    “In my four years as Chairman of the Congressional Western Caucus, I worked hard to counter the Biden administration’s top-down regulations that threatened our public lands and natural resources across the West. This legislation is a course correction from the previous administration to unleash the resources we have under our feet, protect public lands for all who enjoy their benefits, and prioritize conservation over preservation across the United States. I also secured critical funding for three water infrastructure projects in Othello, Winthrop, and Oroville to address the water supply and distribution challenges these communities face,” said Rep. Newhouse. 

    Newhouse added, “I thank Subcommittee Chairman Mike Simpson and Full Committee Chairman Tom Cole for their leadership and commitment to funding priorities that support our rural way of life.” 

    The Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill provides a total discretionary allocation of $37.971 billion, which is $2.54 billion (6%) below the Fiscal Year 2025 enacted level. 

    The bill fully funds the Payments in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) program, estimated at $550 million, and prioritizes funding for Tribes and Wildland Fire Management.  

    Champions American energy dominance and reduces regulatory burdens by: 

    • Providing the OMB requested increase of $13.6 million for offshore oil and gas development at the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and the OMB requested increase of $15 million for onshore oil and gas development at the Bureau of Land Management.
    • Requiring the Secretary of the Interior to conduct onshore and offshore oil and gas lease sales.
    • Prohibiting the use of the social cost of carbon, which has stymied new development.
    • Prohibiting the EPA from imposing the methane fee on oil and gas producers created by the Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act.
    • Prohibiting multiple U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rulings used to weaponize the Endangered Species Act against land users and energy producers.

    Protects access to public lands by: 

    • Blocking restrictions on hunting, fishing, and recreational shooting on federal lands.
    • Preventing additional regulations on ammunition, ammunition components, or fishing tackle under the Toxic Substances Control Act or any other law.
    • Prohibiting restrictions on where standard lead ammunition and fishing tackle can be used on certain federal lands or waters unless conditions are met.
    • Stopping the Bureau of Land Management’s Conservation and Landscape Health rule to ensure continued access to public lands for grazing, recreation, and energy development.

    Bolsters U.S. national security and border protections by:  

    • Reducing our reliance on foreign countries for critical minerals by promoting access to resources here at home through blocking certain lease withdrawals in Minnesota and reinstating mineral leases in the Superior National Forest.
    • Promoting domestic mining by ensuring ancillary mining activities can be approved, which is a fix to the Rosemont decision that created additional red tape and regulatory uncertainty for mining operations.
    • Ensuring chemical and pesticide manufacturers are not overburdened with requirements that would drive businesses overseas and threaten American competitiveness.
    • Prohibiting funds for the National Park Service to provide housing to an alien without lawful status.
    • Providing $771.84 million for Tribal Public Safety and Justice programs, which is a 39% increase over the FY25 enacted level.

    Newhouse secured funding for the following projects in Washington’s Fourth District in this legislation:

    City of Othello 

    Amount Secured: $1,000,000  

    The City of Othello is 100 percent reliant on a rapidly depleting groundwater supply and after several years of data collection, study completions, and pilot test studies, the City of Othello has developed an Aquifer Storage and Recovery (ASR) strategy to mitigate declining water levels in the Wanapum Basalt aquifer. The ASR method has proven to be effective, and the City has progressed to the stage of predesign. The City is requesting funding assistance with the next phase of “design” to build a permanent solution that will result in a sustainable, reliable, environmentally responsible water supply plan for the Othello region.

    City of Winthrop 

    Amount Secured: $1,500,000 

    The proposed project will improve the reliability of the Town of Winthrop’s water source and distribution system. The town only has one functioning well (Well #1). If that well goes down, the town only has a day or two of water available in its three reservoirs. Well #2 has been approved as an emergency water source by Department of Health, but it needs to be rehabilitated to be in regular use. 

    Scope of work includes: 

    • Rehabilitation of Well #2, including new pump, motor, piping, electrical/controls, generator backup, and a new well house.
    • Repairs to the Town’s East Reservoir, including waterproofing, concrete repairs, and altitude valve replacement. 

    Community benefits include public health and safety, fire protection, and water conservation. Winthrop is ranked #6 on the Washington DNR’s burn probability list. Given the community’s vulnerability to wildfire, ensuring a resilient and redundant water supply system with reliable fire flow capacity is critical for public safety. 

    City of Oroville 

    Amount Secured: $1,400,000 

    The project will result in new, upgraded water pipes that ensure safe and reliable drinking water to Oroville’s north end area. The City of Oroville requests $1,750,000 for construction of the first phase of the project which consists of approximately 3,500 lineal feet of aging and undersized water transmission main piping serving the “North End” of the City’s water system. The existing water t-mains consist of 4-inch and 6-inch deteriorated PVC pipe, which cannot provide adequate fire flow or service pressure and are prone to leaking. The project will replace these existing, undersized transmission mains with 12-inch transmission mains along 20th from Main St to Juniper St, and along Juniper St and Main St from 20th St to 23rd St. The project will also replace existing, undersized water transmission mains with 8-inch transmission mains along Deerpath Dr from 21st St to 23rd St, and along 23rd St from Deerpath Dr to Westlake Ave. 

    Bill text before amendments can be found here. 

    ### 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Doctors shouldn’t be allowed to object to medical care if it harms their patients

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Julian Savulescu, Visiting Professor in Biomedical Ethics, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; Distinguished Visiting Professor in Law, University of Melbourne; Uehiro Chair in Practical Ethics, The University of Melbourne

    HRAUN/Getty

    A young woman needs an abortion and the reasons, while urgent, are not medical. A United States Navy nurse at Guantánamo Bay is ordered to force-feed a defiant detainee on hunger strike.

    These very different real-life cases have one connecting thread: the question of whether a health professional can conscientiously object to carrying out a patient’s request.

    Freedom of conscience is often held up as a purely noble principle. But when it’s used to deny health care, it means a single person’s beliefs are dictating what is best for another person’s physical and mental health – which can have devastating, even fatal, results.

    In our recent book, Rethinking Conscientious Objection in Healthcare, colleagues and I conclude doctors should not be free to make medical decisions based on their personal beliefs.

    It’s not noble to refuse care

    Freedom of conscience is strongly – but not absolutely – protected under international human rights law. It is enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    This principle has often been used for moral purposes: for example, to resist orders to torture or kill.

    But after researching use of conscientious objection by health professionals, I have concluded it is seriously flawed when used to deny patients health services. This is especially so when particular doctors have a monopoly on service provision, as is the case with abortion and assisted dying in many rural and regional areas of Australia.

    In Australia, doctors are allowed to conscientiously object to abortion, although nearly all states require referral to other service providers or information about how to access the relevant service.

    In practice, these laws are not enforced and sometimes disregarded.

    A doctor’s refusal can mean patients can be denied the standard of care they need, or indeed, any care at all.

    Health-care professionals are not like pacifists refusing conscription into the military, opposing something forced upon them. They freely choose health-care careers that come with obligations and with ethical stances already established by professional codes of conduct.

    People are free to hold whatever beliefs they choose, but those beliefs will inevitably close off some options for them. For example, a vegetarian will not be able to work in an abattoir. That is true for every one of us. But what shouldn’t happen is a doctor’s personal beliefs closing off legitimate options for their patient.

    4 guiding questions

    Instead of personal values, there are four key secular principles we propose that doctors should rely on when deciding how to advise patients about sensitive procedures:

    • is it legal?

    • is it a just and fair use of any resources that might be limited?

    • is it in the interests of the patient’s wellbeing?

    • is it what the patient has themselves decided they want?

    Of course, there will be times when some of these principles are in conflict – that is when it is important to apply the most crucial ones, the wellbeing of the patient and the patient’s own wishes.

    In Ireland in 2012, a young woman named Savita Halappanavar went to an Irish hospital for treatment for her miscarriage. Doctors knew there was no hope of the pregnancy surviving but refused to evacuate her uterus while there was still a fetal heartbeat, for fear of breaching Ireland’s anti-abortion laws. The result: Savita died of septicaemia at 31.

    If doctors had put the patient’s wellbeing first, they would have given her that termination, despite the law, and it would have saved her life.

    These are the principles that should have been applied to the examples above: the woman seeking an abortion for career reasons or the nurse refusing to force-feed prisoners.

    The doctor (or nurse) should ask: Is it what the patient has autonomously decided they want? Will it lead to the best outcome for both their physical and their mental health?

    If abortion will promote a woman’s wellbeing, it is in her interests. Hunger strikers should not be force-fed because it violates their autonomy.

    An unfair burden

    While doctors’ personal values are important, they should not dictate care at the bedside. Not only can this disadvantage the patient, but it places an unfair burden on colleagues who do accept such work, and must carry a disproportionate load of procedures they might find unpleasant and financially unrewarding.

    It also creates injustice. Patients who are educated, wealthy and well-connected already find it easier to access health care. Conscientious objection intensifies that unfairness in large swathes of the country because it further limits options.

    Two countries with excellent health-care systems, Sweden and Finland, do not permit conscientious objection by medical professionals.

    In Australia, it is time we do the same and strongly limit conscientious objection as a legal right for health professionals. We should also ensure those entering the discipline are prepared to take on all procedures relevant to their specialty.

    And lastly, but most importantly, we should educate them that the patient’s interests and values must always come first. An individual doctor’s sense of moral authority should not be permitted to morph into medical and moral authoritarianism.

    Julian Savulescu does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Doctors shouldn’t be allowed to object to medical care if it harms their patients – https://theconversation.com/doctors-shouldnt-be-allowed-to-object-to-medical-care-if-it-harms-their-patients-260003

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Kaine, Colleagues Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Improve Access to Health Care in Rural Communities

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Virginia Tim Kaine

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA), a member of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, alongside Senators Tim Scott (R-SC), Tina Smith (D-MN), and Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), introduced the Improving Care in Rural America Reauthorization Act, bipartisan legislation to reauthorize programs to improve access to health care in rural communities.

    “Across Virginia and throughout the U.S., rural communities often face unique challenges that lead to reduced or even nonexistent access to lifesaving medical care,” said Kaine. “Republicans in Congress just passed a bill to pay for tax cuts for the uber-wealthy at the expense of everyday Americans, and our rural health providers are now grappling with severe budget cuts that could force them to close their doors. Now more than ever, I urge my colleagues to join us in lifting up our rural communities by passing this bipartisan legislation to reauthorize key federal grants that support their access to health care.”

    The introduction comes shortly after President Donald Trump signed the Republican budget megabill that will devastate hospitals, health care access, and Medicaid coverage in rural communities. Kaine strongly opposed and voted against the legislation.

    Rural communities face unique challenges in accessing lifesaving medical services, including geographic isolation, workforce shortages, transportation barriers, facility closures, and inadequate insurance coverage. These barriers result in unmet health care needs, which translate into a 43 percent higher mortality rate for rural residents compared to their urban and suburban counterparts.

    To combat these startling gaps, the Improving Care in Rural America Reauthorization Act reauthorizes the following three programs under the Public Health Service Act through Fiscal Year 2030 (FY30):

    • Rural Health Care Services Outreach Grants to fund projects that improve the delivery of health care services in rural communities through community engagement and evidence-based models;
    • Rural Health Network Development Grants to support integrated health care networks that collaborate to achieve efficiencies, expand access to, coordinate, and improve quality of health care in rural communities; and
    • Small Health Care Provider Quality Improvement Grants to support the planning and implementation of quality improvement activities for rural primary care providers or providers of health care services, like critical access hospitals, rural health clinics, or a network of providers serving rural communities.

    As a member of the Senate HELP Committee, Kaine has long advocated for improved health care access and health infrastructure in rural communities. In February, Kaine introduced the bipartisan Rural Hospital Support Act, legislation to prevent rural hospital closures by extending and modernizing critical Medicare programs. In 2024, Kaine introduced the Primary Care Team Education Centers Act, legislation to support the education and clinical training of new primary care professionals to address the health workforce shortage across America, including in rural communities.

    Full text of the legislation is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: S. 237, Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act of 2025

    Source: US Congressional Budget Office

    Bill Summary

    S. 237 would expand eligibility for death, disability, and education benefits provided by the Public Safety Officer’s Benefit (PSOB) program to public safety officers and their beneficiaries if an officer dies or becomes permanently and totally disabled as a direct result of a cancer covered under the bill. S. 237 would apply retroactively to officers who die or become disabled on or after January 1, 2020. The bill would require the Department of Justice (DOJ) to review the list of cancers covered by the bill at least once every three years.

    S. 237 also would extend the deadline to file a claim for benefits under the PSOB program for officers and their beneficiaries for officers who die or become permanently and totally disabled from COVID-19. Under current law, the deadline to file such a claim was May 11, 2023, when the public health emergency declared during the coronavirus pandemic ended.

    Estimated Federal Cost

    The estimated budgetary effect of S. 237 is shown in Table 1. The costs of the legislation fall within budget function 750 (administration of justice).

    Table 1.

    Estimated Budgetary Effects of S. 237

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2035

    2025-2030

    2025-2035

     

    Increases in Direct Spending

       

    Estimated Budget Authority

    0

    22

    50

    43

    30

    26

    23

    18

    17

    18

    18

    171

    265

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    15

    40

    45

    34

    27

    23

    19

    17

    17

    18

    161

    255

     

    Increases in Spending Subject to Appropriation

       

    Estimated Authorization

    *

    6

    15

    16

    13

    11

    n.e.

    n.e.

    n.e.

    n.e.

    n.e.

    61

    n.e.

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    5

    14

    16

    13

    11

    n.e.

    n.e.

    n.e.

    n.e.

    n.e.

    59

    n.e.

    Basis of Estimate

    CBO assumes that the bill will be enacted near the end of fiscal year 2025. The estimate is based on CBO’s analysis of cancer incidence and mortality among the general population of the United States and a review of the medical literature related to cancer incidence and mortality among public safety officers, including firefighters. The estimate is also based on CBO’s projections of the number of deaths among public safety officers that are likely to be related to cancer and the number of officers or their beneficiaries who apply for and receive benefits under the PSOB program.

    Background

    The PSOB program is administered by DOJ to provide cash benefits to federal, state, and local public safety officers and their beneficiaries in the event of death or permanent and total disability resulting from physical injuries and certain mental health conditions, such as post-traumatic stress disorder. Education benefits are also available to eligible spouses and children of officers who die or become disabled in the line of duty. Public safety officers include those working in law enforcement, firefighters, emergency management, and emergency medical services.

    The program already provides benefits to World Trade Center responders and their beneficiaries who die or become disabled from cancer from exposure to a carcinogen after the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. CBO is unaware of the program approving any death or disability claim related to cancer that does not stem from attacks on September 11, 2001.

    Eligibility Under the Bill

    Under S. 237, an exposure to a carcinogen would qualify as an injury in the line of duty if an officer later dies or becomes permanently and totally disabled as a direct result of cancer. The bill would direct DOJ to presume that a qualifying injury caused the death or disability if the officer:

    • Was exposed to a carcinogen while in the line of duty;
    • Served for at least five years before being diagnosed with cancer; and
    • Received a diagnosis of cancer within 15 years of leaving service.

    The presumption would not apply if DOJ determines, based on competent medical evidence, that the exposure to a carcinogen was not a substantial factor in an officer’s death or disability.

    Direct Spending

    The PSOB program pays a one-time death benefit to spouses and children or other designated beneficiaries of officers who die in the line of duty. The cost of those benefits is classified in the budget as direct spending. In 2025, the one-time benefit is $448,575; under current law, that amount increases each year to account for inflation.

    Cancer Claims. CBO expects that most relatives of potentially eligible officers would apply for benefits. Based on information from DOJ and other similar programs, such as the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund, CBO estimates that about 75 percent of claims for cancer-related deaths among public safety officers would ultimately result in benefits being paid to family members or designated beneficiaries. CBO expects that firefighters would account for most claims under the bill.

    Using data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on cancer mortality among the general population and a review of medical literature regarding cancer incidence and mortality among firefighters, CBO estimates that, on average, about 40 claims would be filed annually over the 2025-2035 period.

    S. 237 also would require benefits to be awarded for cancer deaths occurring between January 1, 2020, and the date of enactment. CBO estimates that about 200 claims would be submitted for officers who died from cancer during that period and that those claims would be filed within three years of enactment.

    COVID-19 Claims. Additionally, the bill would extend by three years the deadline to file a claim for death benefits for spouses, children, or other beneficiaries of officers who die from COVID-19. Under current law, an officer is presumed to be eligible by DOJ if the officer was diagnosed with COVID-19 within 45 days of the last day of duty and medical evidence indicates that the officer had the virus or complications from the virus at the time of death. Under current law, the deadline to file such a claim was May 11, 2023, when the public health emergency related to the coronavirus pandemic was lifted. Using information from DOJ about the number of those claims it received between 2020 and 2023 and data from the CDC on COVID-19 mortality, CBO estimates that about 150 claims would be submitted for officers who die from COVID-19.

    In total, CBO estimates that under the bill, about 765 claims would be filed over the 2025-2035 period. Based on the amount of time CBO estimates that it would take DOJ to process each eligible claim, CBO estimates that about 530 claims would be approved for benefits over the next decade under S. 237. (About 30 claims filed during that period would be approved after 2035.) Accounting for expected increases in inflation, CBO estimates that enacting S. 237 would increase direct spending by $255 million over the 2025-2035 period.

    Spending Subject to Appropriation

    By expanding the scope of qualifying deaths and injuries, S. 237 also would increase the number of claimants eligible for disability and education benefits under the PSOB program. Spending for those benefits is subject to the availability of appropriated funds. DOJ also would incur administrative costs to implement the bill. In total, CBO estimates that implanting S. 237 would cost $59 million over the 2025-2030 period (see Table 2). That spending would be subject to the availability of appropriated funds.

    Disability Benefits. Under current law, the PSOB program pays benefits for permanent and total disability resulting from injuries suffered in the line of duty. Under current law, claimants receive a one-time benefit that is the same amount as the death benefit ($448,575 in 2025), which increases each year to account for inflation. In total, CBO estimates that the cost of disability benefits under S. 237 would be $24 million over the 2025-2030 period.

    Table 2.

    Estimated Increases in Spending Subject to Appropriation Under S. 237

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

     
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2025-2030

    Disability Benefits

                 

    Estimated Authorization

    0

    1

    5

    7

    6

    5

    24

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    1

    5

    7

    6

    5

    24

    Education Benefits

                 

    Estimated Authorization

    0

    4

    9

    8

    6

    5

    32

    Estimated Outlays

    0

    3

    8

    8

    6

    5

    30

    Administrative Costs

                 

    Estimated Authorization

    *

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    5

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    1

    1

    1

    1

    1

    5

    Total Changes

                 

    Estimated Authorization

    *

    6

    15

    16

    13

    11

    61

    Estimated Outlays

    *

    5

    14

    16

    13

    11

    59

    Cancer Claims. S. 237 would designate an exposure to a carcinogen as an injury in the line of duty if an officer later becomes permanently disabled as a direct result of cancer. Using information from DOJ about the historical number of claims, CBO expects that fewer claims for disability benefits would be filed under the bill than claims for death benefits. On that basis, CBO estimates that one claim for disability benefits would be filed for every three claims for death benefits. Additionally, based on conversations with DOJ and subject matter experts, CBO expects that most officers affected by cancer would not meet the permanently and totally disabled threshold. Based on historical approval rates for disability-related claims, CBO estimates that about 50 percent of claims for disability claims would ultimately be approved.

    Under the bill, CBO estimates that about 120 claims for disability benefits related to cancer would be filed over the 2025-2030 period. Using information from DOJ about the time it takes to process each claim, CBO estimates that about 50 claims would be approved over the same period. (About 10 additional claims filed during the period would be approved after 2030.)

    COVID-19 Claims. S. 237 also would extend by three years the deadline to file a claim for benefits under the PSOB program for officers who become permanently and totally disabled from COVID-19. Using data from DOJ about the number of those claims filed and approved over the 2020-2023 period, CBO estimates that under S. 237 fewer than five claims would be approved for officers who become disabled from COVID-19.

    Education Benefits. Under current law, the spouse or children of a public safety officer who dies or becomes permanently disabled from physical injuries and certain mental health conditions may also be eligible for education benefits to cover tuition, fees, books, supplies and room and board. The monthly benefit for a full-time student in 2025 is $1,536; that amount is adjusted each year for inflation. Under current law, the maximum duration of benefits is 45 months of full-time education or a proportionate duration of part-time education.

    Historical data from the PSOB program indicate that about three claims for education benefits have been approved for every two claims that have been approved for death and disability benefits. On that basis, CBO estimates that about 360 claims stemming from death benefits and about 50 claims stemming from disability benefits will be approved over the 2025-2030 period under S. 237. Using information about the time it takes to process claims for education benefits, CBO estimates that about 650 people will receive benefits over the 2025-2030 period under the bill. In total, CBO estimates that those benefits would cost $30 million over the 2025-2030 period. Those outlays reflect the historical spending patterns for such claims.

    Administrative Costs. As discussed above, implementing S. 237 would require DOJ to review more than 150 additional claims annually under the bill. Using information from the agency about the number of staff required to process claims under current law, CBO estimates that implementing the bill would require an additional five people each year to process claims and review the list of eligible cancers at a cost of $1 million annually. In total, CBO estimates that DOJ would incur $5 million in administrative costs over the 2025-2030 period.

    Uncertainty

    CBO’s cost estimate for S. 237 is subject to significant uncertainty in several areas:

    • Identifying public safety officers’ rate of incidence and deaths from cancer and COVID-19;
    • Estimating the number of people who would be eligible to file claims for benefits under the bill;
    • Calculating the proportion of claims that DOJ would determine to be eligible, which is affected by the latency periods for different cancers and other circumstances specific to each officer’s medical history and lifestyle; and
    • Anticipating the timing of submissions and the amount of time required to review applications and process claims.

    CBO strives for estimates that are in the middle of possible outcomes and each factor in the estimate could be higher or lower than CBO estimates. As a result, enacting the bill could result in higher or lower costs than CBO estimates.

    Pay-As-You-Go Considerations

    The Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010 establishes budget-reporting and enforcement procedures for legislation affecting direct spending or revenues. The net changes in outlays that are subject to those pay-as-you-go procedures are shown in Table 3.

    Table 3.

    CBO’s Estimate of the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Effects of S. 237, the Honoring Our Fallen Heroes Act of 2025, as Reported by the Senate Committee on the Judiciary on May 20, 2025

     

    By Fiscal Year, Millions of Dollars

       
     

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

    2031

    2032

    2033

    2034

    2035

    2025-2030

    2025-2035

     

    Net Increase in the Deficit 

       

    Pay-As-You-Go Effect

    0

    15

    40

    45

    34

    27

    23

    19

    17

    17

    18

    161

    255

    Increase in Long-Term Net Direct Spending and Deficits

    CBO estimates that enacting S. 237 would not increase net direct spending by more than $2.5 billion in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2036.

    CBO estimates that enacting S. 237 would not increase on‑budget deficits by more than $5 billion in any of the four consecutive 10-year periods beginning in 2036.

    Mandates

    The bill contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act.

    Federal Costs: Jeremy Crimm

    Mandates: Erich Dvorak

    Estimate Reviewed By

    Justin Humphrey
    Chief, Finance, Housing, and Education Cost Estimates Unit

    Kathleen FitzGerald 
    Chief, Public and Private Mandates Unit

    H. Samuel Papenfuss 
    Deputy Director of Budget Analysis

    Phillip L. Swagel

    Director, Congressional Budget Office

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Middlefield Banc Corp. Reports 2025 Six-Month Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MIDDLEFIELD, Ohio, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Middlefield Banc Corp. (NASDAQ: MBCN) today reported financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

    2025 Second-Quarter Financial Highlights (on a year-over-year basis):

      ● Earnings per share increased 46.2% year-over-year to $0.76 per diluted share
      ● Asset quality improved from the 2024 fourth quarter with nonperforming assets to total assets decreasing by 32 basis points to 1.30%
      ● Net interest margin expanded 37 basis points to 3.88% and increased 19 basis points from the 2025 first quarter
      ● Total loans increased $84.2 million, or 5.6% to a record $1.58 billion
      ● Total assets increased $96.2 million, or 5.3% to a record $1.92 billion
      ● Book value increased 4.3% to $26.74 from $25.63 per share, while tangible book value(1) increased 6.1% to $21.60 from $20.37 per share

     (1) See non-GAAP reconciliation under the section “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations”

    “The second quarter of 2025 was another strong quarter of growth, profitability and value creation for Middlefield,” stated Ronald L. Zimmerly, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer. “Total loans have increased at an 8.2% annualized rate since the beginning of the year to a record $1.58 billion, asset quality continued to improve sequentially, and our net interest margin for the second quarter of 2025 expanded 37 basis points year-over-year to 3.88%.  These results led to strong growth in profitability during the quarter.  Net income also benefited from a $1.2 million net gain on the exchange of real estate associated with the relocation of our Westerville, Ohio branch.  Relocating our Westerville office is a great opportunity, supported by favorable demographics and underscores our multi-year strategy to expand our presence in the Central Ohio region. We expect our new Westerville branch to open in the second half of 2025.”

    “I am pleased by the strong start to 2025 and the direction we are headed.  We remain focused on investing in our platform, which includes upgrades to our technology infrastructure, adding new, experienced commercial bankers, and pursuing opportunities to expand Middlefield across our compelling Ohio markets.  As a result of these efforts and the contributions of our high-performing team, we expect additional loan and core deposit growth to benefit profitability throughout the remainder of 2025,” concluded Mr. Zimmerly.

    Income Statement
    Net interest income for the 2025 second quarter increased 15.6% to $17.4 million, compared to $15.1 million for the 2024 second quarter. The net interest margin for the 2025 second quarter was 3.88%, compared to 3.51% for the same period of 2024. Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2025, increased 11.6% to $33.5 million, compared to $30.1 million for the same period last year. The increase was primarily due to strong loan growth, a decrease in FHLB advances, and an overall decline in rates for deposits. Net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2025, was 3.79%, compared to 3.53% last year. 

    Noninterest income for the 2025 second quarter was $3.1 million, compared to $1.8 million for the same period the previous year. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, noninterest income increased $1.5 million to $5.0 million, compared to $3.6 million for the same period in 2024.  In April 2025, Middlefield completed an exchange of real estate with the City of Westerville, Ohio for a parcel of land that had a fair value of $1.5 million. In exchange, Middlefield transferred land and a building with related furnishings associated with its current branch located in Westerville, Ohio. The transferred branch had a net book value of $221,000. The exchange of real estate transaction resulted in a one-time, non-cash gain of $1.2 million.

    For the 2025 second quarter, noninterest expense was $13.7 million, compared to $11.9 million for the 2024 second quarter. Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2025, was $25.8 million, compared to $23.9 million for the same period in 2024. Noninterest expense for the 2025 second quarter included a $700,000 loss associated with recording a separate property located in Westerville, Ohio as held for sale.     

    Net income for the 2025 second quarter was $6.2 million, or $0.76 per diluted share, compared to $4.2 million, or $0.52 per diluted share, for the same period last year. Net income for the six months ended June 30, 2025, was $11.0 million, or $1.36 per diluted share, compared to $8.3 million, or $1.03 per diluted share, for the same period last year. 

    For the 2025 second quarter, pre-tax, pre-provision net income was $6.9 million, compared to $4.9 million for the same period of 2024. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, pre-tax, pre-provision net income was $12.7 million, compared to $9.7 million for the same period last year.  (See non-GAAP reconciliation under the section “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations”.)

    Balance Sheet
    Total assets at June 30, 2025, increased 5.3% to a record $1.92 billion, compared to $1.83 billion at June 30, 2024. Total loans at June 30, 2025, were a record $1.58 billion, compared to $1.50 billion at June 30, 2024. The 5.6% year-over-year increase in total loans was primarily due to higher home equity lines of credit, commercial and industrial loans, residential real estate loans, non-owner occupied, and owner occupied loans, partially offset by a reduction in construction and other loans and multifamily loans.

    The investment securities available-for-sale portfolio was $161.1 million at June 30, 2025, compared with $166.4 million at June 30, 2024.

    Total liabilities at June 30, 2025, increased 5.4% to $1.71 billion, compared to $1.62 billion at June 30, 2024. Total deposits at June 30, 2025, were $1.59 billion, compared to $1.47 billion at June 30, 2024. The 8.4% year-over-year increase in deposits was primarily due to growth in money market and interest-bearing demand deposits, partially offset by declines in savings deposit accounts. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits were 24.2% of total deposits at June 30, 2025, compared to 26.3% at June 30, 2024. At June 30, 2025, the Company had brokered deposits of $165.1 million, compared to $86.5 million at June 30, 2024.

    Michael C. Ranttila, Chief Financial Officer, stated, “Middlefield’s highly profitable financial model, disciplined loan pricing, and strong liquidity levels provides us with the flexibility to support both loan and operational growth. We continue to monitor our funding mix to support our loan portfolio at a reasonable cost, and such actions contributed to a seven-basis point reduction in our cost of funds since the beginning of the year.  Throughout the second half of 2025, we are focused on growing core deposits by improving the mix of commercial and industrial loans and growing treasury management relationships.”

    Middlefield’s CRE portfolio included the following categories at June 30, 2025:

    (Dollar amounts in thousands)   Balance     Percent of
    CRE Portfolio
        Percent of
    Loan Portfolio
        Weighted Average
    Loan-to-Value
     
                                     
    Multi-Family   $ 79,497       11.7 %     5.0 %     64.7 %
    Owner Occupied                                
    Real Estate and Rental and Leasing     56,806       8.3 %     3.6 %     55.6 %
    Other Services (except Public Administration)     40,734       6.0 %     2.6 %     58.2 %
    Manufacturing     17,919       2.6 %     1.1 %     44.4 %
    Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting     12,318       1.8 %     0.8 %     36.3 %
    Educational Services     11,844       1.7 %     0.7 %     50.1 %
    Other     57,024       8.3 %     3.6 %     54.1 %
    Total Owner Occupied   $ 196,645       28.7 %     12.4 %        
    Non-Owner Occupied                                
    Real Estate and Rental and Leasing     333,645       49.0 %     21.1 %     54.8 %
    Accommodation and Food Services     40,430       5.9 %     2.6 %     57.0 %
    Health Care and Social Assistance     19,456       2.9 %     1.2 %     65.9 %
    Manufacturing     7,412       1.1 %     0.5 %     46.7 %
    Other     4,089       0.7 %     0.3 %     76.4 %
    Total Non-Owner Occupied   $ 405,032       59.6 %     25.7 %        
    Total CRE   $ 681,174       100.0 %     43.1 %        


    Stockholders’ Equity and Dividends

    At June 30, 2025, stockholders’ equity was $216.1 million, compared to $206.8 million at June 30, 2024. The 4.5% year-over-year increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily from higher retained earnings, partially offset by an increase in the unrealized losses on the available-for-sale investment portfolio. On a per-share basis, shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2025, was $26.74, compared to $25.63 at June 30, 2024.

    At June 30, 2025, tangible stockholders’ equity(1) was $174.6 million, compared to $164.3 million at June 30, 2024. On a per-share basis, tangible stockholders’ equity(1) was $21.60 at June 30, 2025, compared to $20.37 at June 30, 2024. (1)See non-GAAP reconciliation under the section “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations”.

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company declared cash dividends of $0.42 per share, totaling $3.4 million. Beginning in the first quarter of 2025, the Company increased the quarterly cash dividend by $0.01, or 5% from the previous year’s $0.20 per share quarterly cash dividend.  

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock.  

    At June 30, 2025, the Company’s equity-to-assets ratio was 11.23%, compared to 11.31% at June 30, 2024.

    Asset Quality
    For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the Company recorded a recovery of credit losses of $411,000, compared to a recovery of credit losses of $49,000 for the same period of 2024.  

    Net recoveries were $227,000, or (0.03%) of average loans, annualized, for the six months ended June 30, 2025, compared to net recoveries of $97,000, or (0.01%) of average loans, annualized, for the same period of 2024.      

    Nonperforming loans at June 30, 2025, were $25.1 million, compared to $16.0 million at June 30, 2024. The year-over-year increase in nonperforming assets was primarily due to a $12.0 million loan moved to nonaccrual in the 2024 third quarter. The allowance for credit losses at June 30, 2025, stood at $22.3 million, or 1.41% of total loans, compared to $21.8 million, or 1.46% of total loans at June 30, 2024. The increase in the allowance for credit losses was mainly from changes in projected loss drivers, prepayment assumptions, curtailment expectations over the reasonable and supportable forecast period, and geographic footprint of unemployment data, as well as an overall increase in total loans.

    Mr. Ranttila continued, “Asset quality demonstrates the success of our disciplined approach to credit quality and risk management, as nonperforming assets to total assets have improved to 1.30% at June 30, 2025, compared to 1.56% at March 31, 2025, and 1.62% at December 31, 2024.  Over the past six months, non-performing assets declined by $4.9 million from $30.0 million at December 31, 2024, primarily as a result of the successful payoff of one previously disclosed non-accruing loan.  In addition, reductions in the reserve against individually analyzed loans as well as the reserve for unfunded commitments drove a $506,000 recovery for credit losses in the second quarter. We continue to expect stable economic activity across our Central, Western and Northeast Ohio markets that will support loan demand and asset quality throughout 2025.” 

    About Middlefield Banc Corp.
    Middlefield Banc Corp., headquartered in Middlefield, Ohio, is the Bank holding Company of The Middlefield Banking Company, with total assets of $1.92 billion at June 30, 2025. The Bank operates 21 full-service banking centers and an LPL Financial® brokerage office serving Ada, Beachwood, Bellefontaine, Chardon, Cortland, Dublin, Garrettsville, Kenton, Mantua, Marysville, Middlefield, Newbury, Orwell, Plain City, Powell, Solon, Sunbury, Twinsburg, and Westerville. The Bank also operates a Loan Production Office in Mentor, Ohio.

    Additional information is available at www.middlefieldbank.bank

    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
    This press release includes disclosure of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s tangible book value per share, return on average tangible equity, and pre-tax, pre-provision for loan losses income, which are financial measures not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts required to be disclosed by GAAP. Middlefield Banc Corp. believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide both management and investors a more complete understanding of the underlying operational results and trends and Middlefield Banc Corp.’s marketplace performance. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the numbers prepared in accordance with GAAP. The reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures are included in the following Consolidated Financial Highlights tables below.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
    This press release of Middlefield Banc Corp. and the reports Middlefield Banc Corp. files with the Securities and Exchange Commission often contain “forward-looking statements” relating to present or future trends or factors affecting the banking industry and, specifically, the financial operations, markets and products of Middlefield Banc Corp. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. There are several important factors that could cause Middlefield Banc Corp.’s future results to differ materially from historical performance or projected performance. These factors include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant increase in competitive pressures among financial institutions; (2) changes in the interest rate environment that may reduce interest margins; (3) changes in prepayment speeds, charge-offs and loan loss provisions; (4) less favorable than expected general economic conditions; (5) legislative or regulatory changes that may adversely affect businesses in which Middlefield Banc Corp. is engaged; (6) technological issues which may adversely affect Middlefield Banc Corp.’s financial operations or customers; (7) changes in the securities markets; or (8) risk factors mentioned in the reports and registration statements Middlefield Banc Corp. files with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Middlefield Banc Corp. undertakes no obligation to release revisions to these forward-looking statements or to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this press release.

    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
    Consolidated Selected Financial Highlights
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, unaudited)

        June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,  
    Balance Sheets (period end)   2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
    ASSETS                                        
    Cash and due from banks   $ 59,145     $ 56,150     $ 46,037     $ 61,851     $ 50,496  
    Federal funds sold     13,701       10,720       9,755       12,022       1,762  
    Cash and cash equivalents     72,846       66,870       55,792       73,873       52,258  
    Investment securities available for sale, at fair value     161,116       165,014       165,802       169,895       166,424  
    Other investments     1,014       1,021       855       895       881  
    Loans held for sale     152       –       –       249       –  
    Loans:                                        
    Commercial real estate:                                        
    Owner occupied     196,645       185,412       181,447       187,313       182,809  
    Non-owner occupied     405,032       413,621       412,291       407,159       385,648  
    Multifamily     79,497       88,737       89,849       94,798       86,951  
    Residential real estate     357,217       351,274       353,442       345,748       337,121  
    Commercial and industrial     257,519       235,547       229,034       213,172       234,702  
    Home equity lines of credit     156,297       147,154       143,379       137,761       131,047  
    Construction and other     123,531       122,653       103,608       111,550       132,530  
    Consumer installment     6,187       5,951       6,564       7,030       6,896  
    Total loans     1,581,925       1,550,349       1,519,614       1,504,531       1,497,704  
    Less allowance for credit losses     22,335       22,401       22,447       22,526       21,795  
    Net loans     1,559,590       1,527,948       1,497,167       1,482,005       1,475,909  
    Premises and equipment, net     20,304       20,494       20,565       20,528       20,744  
    Premises and equipment held for sale     1,015       –       –       –       –  
    Goodwill     36,356       36,356       36,356       36,356       36,356  
    Core deposit intangibles     5,112       5,362       5,611       5,869       6,126  
    Bank-owned life insurance     35,102       34,866       35,259       35,049       34,802  
    Accrued interest receivable and other assets     31,762       30,425       35,952       32,916       34,686  
    TOTAL ASSETS   $ 1,924,369     $ 1,888,356     $ 1,853,359     $ 1,857,635     $ 1,828,186  
        June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,  
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
    LIABILITIES                                        
    Deposits:                                        
    Noninterest-bearing demand   $ 386,248     $ 369,492     $ 377,875     $ 390,933     $ 387,024  
    Interest-bearing demand     221,146       222,953       208,291       218,002       206,542  
    Money market     466,935       481,664       414,074       376,619       355,630  
    Savings     184,534       189,943       197,749       199,984       192,472  
    Time     334,755       275,673       247,704       327,231       327,876  
    Total deposits     1,593,618       1,539,725       1,445,693       1,512,769       1,469,544  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     89,000       110,000       172,400       106,000       125,000  
    Other borrowings     11,557       11,609       11,660       11,711       11,762  
    Accrued interest payable and other liabilities     14,142       13,229       13,044       16,450       15,092  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES     1,708,317       1,674,563       1,642,797       1,646,930       1,621,398  
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                                        
    Common stock, no par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized, 9,960,503 shares issued, 8,081,193 shares outstanding as of June 30, 2025     162,195       162,195       161,999       161,916       161,823  
    Additional paid-in capital     811       515       246       108       –  
    Retained earnings     116,892       112,432       109,299       106,067       105,342  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (22,937 )     (20,440 )     (20,073 )     (16,477 )     (19,468 )
    Treasury stock, at cost; 1,879,310 shares as of June 30, 2025     (40,909 )     (40,909 )     (40,909 )     (40,909 )     (40,909 )
    TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     216,052       213,793       210,562       210,705       206,788  
                                             
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 1,924,369     $ 1,888,356     $ 1,853,359     $ 1,857,635     $ 1,828,186  


    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.

    Consolidated Selected Financial Highlights
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, unaudited)

        For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
        June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
    Statements of Income   2025     2025     2024     2024     2024     2025     2024  
                                                             
    INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME                                                        
    Interest and fees on loans   $ 25,122     $ 23,387     $ 23,308     $ 23,441     $ 23,422     $ 48,509     $ 45,817  
    Interest-earning deposits in other institutions     325       291       320       348       386       616       823  
    Federal funds sold     120       155       151       143       122       275       274  
    Investment securities:                                                        
    Taxable interest     526       530       528       528       505       1,056       972  
    Tax-exempt interest     960       960       961       962       966       1,920       1,938  
    Dividends on stock     183       150       170       191       198       333       387  
    Total interest and dividend income     27,236       25,473       25,438       25,613       25,599       52,709       50,211  
    INTEREST EXPENSE                                                        
    Deposits     8,789       7,885       8,582       8,792       8,423       16,674       15,889  
    Short-term borrowings     870       1,347       1,128       1,575       1,920       2,217       3,913  
    Other borrowings     140       143       173       173       173       283       357  
    Total interest expense     9,799       9,375       9,883       10,540       10,516       19,174       20,159  
    NET INTEREST INCOME     17,437       16,098       15,555       15,073       15,083       33,535       30,052  
    Provision for (recovery of) credit losses     (506 )     95       (177 )     2,234       87       (411 )     (49 )
    NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION                                                        
    FOR (RECOVERY OF) CREDIT LOSSES     17,943       16,003       15,732       12,839       14,996       33,946       30,101  
    NONINTEREST INCOME                                                        
    Service charges on deposit accounts     1,061       989       1,068       959       971       2,050       1,880  
    Gain (Loss) on equity securities     (7 )     (34 )     56       14       (27 )     (41 )     (79 )
    Earnings on bank-owned life insurance     230       493       230       246       227       723       454  
    Gain on sale of loans     39       24       64       56       69       63       79  
    Revenue from investment services     310       268       237       206       269       578       473  
    Gain on exchange of real estate     1,229       –       –       –       –       1,229       –  
    Gross rental income     –       –       –       –       –       –       67  
    Other income     216       204       259       262       251       420       682  
    Total noninterest income     3,078       1,944       1,914       1,743       1,760       5,022       3,556  
                                                             
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE                                                        
    Salaries and employee benefits     6,734       6,557       5,996       6,201       6,111       13,291       12,444  
    Occupancy expense     667       687       596       627       601       1,354       1,153  
    Equipment expense     248       225       221       203       261       473       501  
    Data processing costs     1,273       1,271       1,174       1,214       1,135       2,544       2,417  
    Ohio state franchise tax     399       399       390       399       397       798       794  
    Federal deposit insurance expense     267       267       293       255       256       534       507  
    Professional fees     521       598       611       539       557       1,119       1,115  
    Advertising expense     451       364       371       283       508       815       927  
    Software amortization expense     95       90       83       74       21       185       43  
    Core deposit intangible amortization     250       249       258       257       258       499       516  
    Loss on premises and equipment held for sale     693       –       –       –       –       693       –  
    Gross other real estate owned expenses     –       –       –       –       –       –       99  
    Other expense     2,053       1,486       1,810       1,819       1,797       3,539       3,351  
    Total noninterest expense     13,651       12,193       11,803       11,871       11,902       25,844       23,867  
                                                             
    Income before income taxes     7,370       5,754       5,843       2,711       4,854       13,124       9,790  
    Income taxes     1,213       924       995       371       690       2,137       1,459  
                                                             
    NET INCOME   $ 6,157     $ 4,830     $ 4,848     $ 2,340     $ 4,164     $ 10,987     $ 8,331  
                                                             
    PTPP (1)   $ 6,864     $ 5,849     $ 5,666     $ 4,945     $ 4,941     $ 12,713     $ 9,741  
    (1)  See section “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for the reconciliation of GAAP performance measures to non-GAAP measures.


    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.

    Consolidated Selected Financial Highlights
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share and share amounts, unaudited)

        For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
        June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024     2025     2024  
    Per common share data                                                        
    Net income per common share – basic   $ 0.76     $ 0.60     $ 0.60     $ 0.29     $ 0.52     $ 1.36     $ 1.04  
    Net income per common share – diluted   $ 0.76     $ 0.60     $ 0.60     $ 0.29     $ 0.52     $ 1.36     $ 1.03  
    Dividends declared per share   $ 0.21     $ 0.21     $ 0.20     $ 0.20     $ 0.20     $ 0.42     $ 0.40  
    Book value per share (period end)   $ 26.74     $ 26.46     $ 26.08     $ 26.11     $ 25.63     $ 26.74     $ 25.63  
    Tangible book value per share (period end) (1) (2)   $ 21.60     $ 21.29     $ 20.88     $ 20.87     $ 20.37     $ 21.60     $ 20.37  
    Dividends declared   $ 1,697     $ 1,697     $ 1,616     $ 1,615     $ 1,613     $ 3,394     $ 3,226  
    Dividend yield     2.80 %     3.05 %     2.84 %     2.76 %     3.34 %     2.81 %     3.34 %
    Dividend payout ratio     27.56 %     35.13 %     33.33 %     69.02 %     38.74 %     30.89 %     38.72 %
    Average shares outstanding – basic     8,081,193       8,078,805       8,071,905       8,071,032       8,067,144       8,080,006       8,079,174  
    Average shares outstanding – diluted     8,113,572       8,097,545       8,092,357       8,086,872       8,072,499       8,107,066       8,084,529  
    Period ending shares outstanding     8,081,193       8,081,193       8,073,708       8,071,032       8,067,144       8,081,193       8,067,144  
                                                             
    Selected ratios                                                        
    Return on average assets (Annualized)     1.29 %     1.04 %     1.04 %     0.50 %     0.91 %     1.17 %     0.91 %
    Return on average equity (Annualized)     11.53 %     9.22 %     9.19 %     4.45 %     8.15 %     10.39 %     8.16 %
    Return on average tangible common equity (1) (3)     14.31 %     11.48 %     11.50 %     5.58 %     10.29 %     12.92 %     10.30 %
    Efficiency (4)     64.49 %     65.22 %     65.05 %     67.93 %     67.97 %     64.83 %     68.32 %
    Equity to assets at period end     11.23 %     11.32 %     11.36 %     11.34 %     11.31 %     11.23 %     11.31 %
    Noninterest expense to average assets     0.72 %     0.65 %     0.63 %     0.66 %     0.64 %     1.36 %     1.30 %
    (1)  See section “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for the reconciliation of GAAP performance measures to non-GAAP measures.
    (2)  Calculated by dividing tangible common equity by shares outstanding.
    (3)  Calculated by dividing annualized net income for each period by average tangible common equity.
    (4)  The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expense less amortization of intangibles by the sum of net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis plus noninterest income.
        For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
        June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
    Yields   2025     2025     2024     2024     2024     2025     2024  
    Interest-earning assets:                                                        
    Loans receivable (1)     6.40 %     6.17 %     6.12 %     6.19 %     6.27 %     6.29 %     6.19 %
    Investment securities (1) (2)     3.64 %     3.69 %     3.63 %     3.62 %     3.59 %     3.67 %     3.56 %
    Interest-earning deposits with other banks     4.13 %     3.57 %     4.23 %     4.27 %     4.59 %     3.84 %     4.74 %
    Total interest-earning assets     6.03 %     5.81 %     5.78 %     5.84 %     5.92 %     5.92 %     5.85 %
    Deposits:                                                        
    Interest-bearing demand deposits     2.49 %     2.13 %     2.07 %     2.16 %     1.93 %     2.31 %     1.90 %
    Money market deposits     3.53 %     3.38 %     3.81 %     3.93 %     3.95 %     3.46 %     3.88 %
    Savings deposits     0.86 %     0.82 %     0.75 %     0.71 %     0.64 %     0.84 %     0.61 %
    Certificates of deposit     3.66 %     3.93 %     4.21 %     4.49 %     4.57 %     3.79 %     4.32 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits     2.95 %     2.82 %     3.05 %     3.17 %     3.15 %     2.89 %     3.02 %
    Non-Deposit Funding:                                                        
    Borrowings     4.54 %     4.58 %     4.93 %     5.54 %     5.60 %     4.56 %     5.60 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     3.06 %     3.01 %     3.21 %     3.41 %     3.45 %     3.04 %     3.34 %
    Cost of deposits     2.21 %     2.10 %     2.24 %     2.33 %     2.30 %     2.16 %     2.19 %
    Cost of funds     2.34 %     2.30 %     2.41 %     2.58 %     2.61 %     2.32 %     2.52 %
    Net interest margin (3)     3.88 %     3.69 %     3.56 %     3.46 %     3.51 %     3.79 %     3.53 %
    (1)  Tax-equivalent adjustments to calculate the yield on tax-exempt securities and loans were determined using an effective tax rate of 21%.
    (2)  Yield is calculated on the basis of amortized cost.
    (3)  Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.


    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.

    Consolidated Selected Financial Highlights
    (unaudited)

        For the Three Months Ended  
        June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,  
    Asset quality data   2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, unaudited)                                        
    Nonperforming assets (1)   $ 25,052     $ 29,550     $ 29,984     $ 30,078     $ 15,961  
                                             
    Allowance for credit losses   $ 22,335     $ 22,401     $ 22,447     $ 22,526     $ 21,795  
    Allowance for credit losses/total loans     1.41 %     1.44 %     1.48 %     1.50 %     1.46 %
    Net charge-offs (recoveries):                                        
    Quarter-to-date   $ (18 )   $ (209 )   $ 151     $ 1,382     $ (29 )
    Year-to-date     (227 )     (209 )     1,436       1,285       (97 )
    Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans, annualized:                                        
    Quarter-to-date     (0.00 %)     (0.06 %)     0.04 %     0.36 %     (0.01 %)
    Year-to-date     (0.03 %)     (0.06 %)     0.10 %     0.11 %     (0.01 %)
                                             
    Nonperforming loans/total loans     1.58 %     1.91 %     1.97 %     2.00 %     1.07 %
    Allowance for credit losses/nonperforming loans     89.15 %     75.81 %     74.86 %     74.89 %     136.55 %
    Nonperforming assets/total assets     1.30 %     1.56 %     1.62 %     1.62 %     0.87 %
    (1) Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans.


    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.

    GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations

    Reconciliation of Common Stockholders’ Equity to Tangible Common Equity   For the Three Months Ended  
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, unaudited)   June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,  
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
                                             
    Stockholders’ equity   $ 216,052     $ 213,793     $ 210,562     $ 210,705     $ 206,788  
    Less goodwill and other intangibles     41,468       41,718       41,967       42,225       42,482  
    Tangible common equity   $ 174,584     $ 172,075     $ 168,595     $ 168,480     $ 164,306  
                                             
    Shares outstanding     8,081,193       8,081,193       8,073,708       8,071,032       8,067,144  
    Tangible book value per share   $ 21.60     $ 21.29     $ 20.88     $ 20.87     $ 20.37  

    Reconciliation of Average Equity to Return on Average Tangible Common Equity
      For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
                                                             
        June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024     2025     2024  
                                                             
    Average stockholders’ equity   $ 214,144     $ 212,465     $ 209,864     $ 209,096     $ 205,379     $ 213,235     $ 205,330  
    Less average goodwill and other intangibles     41,589       41,839       42,092       42,350       42,607       41,714       42,609  
    Average tangible common equity   $ 172,555     $ 170,626     $ 167,772     $ 166,746     $ 162,772     $ 171,521     $ 162,721  
                                                             
    Net income   $ 6,157     $ 4,830     $ 4,848     $ 2,340     $ 4,164     $ 10,987     $ 8,331  
    Return on average tangible common equity (annualized)     14.31 %     11.48 %     11.50 %     5.58 %     10.29 %     12.92 %     10.30 %

    Reconciliation of Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Income (PTPP)
      For the Three Months Ended     For the Six Months Ended  
                                                             
        June 30,     March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     June 30,     June 30,  
        2025     2025     2024     2024     2024     2025     2024  
                                                             
    Net income   $ 6,157     $ 4,830     $ 4,848     $ 2,340     $ 4,164     $ 10,987     $ 8,331  
    Add income taxes     1,213       924       995       371       690       2,137       1,459  
    Add provision for (recovery of) credit losses     (506 )     95       (177 )     2,234       87       (411 )     (49 )
    PTPP   $ 6,864     $ 5,849     $ 5,666     $ 4,945     $ 4,941     $ 12,713     $ 9,741  


    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.

    Average Balance Sheets
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, unaudited)

        For the Three Months Ended  
        June 30,     June 30,  
        2025     2024  
        Average             Average     Average             Average  
        Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost     Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost  
    Interest-earning assets:                                                
    Loans receivable (1)   $ 1,576,050     $ 25,122       6.40 %   $ 1,503,440     $ 23,422       6.27 %
    Investment securities (1) (2)     191,619       1,486       3.64 %     191,752       1,471       3.62 %
    Interest-earning deposits with other banks (3)     61,012       628       4.13 %     61,891       706       4.59 %
    Total interest-earning assets     1,828,681       27,236       6.03 %     1,757,083       25,599       5.93 %
    Noninterest-earning assets     79,414                       86,431                  
    Total assets   $ 1,908,095                     $ 1,843,514                  
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                                                
    Interest-bearing demand deposits   $ 217,859     $ 1,353       2.49 %   $ 209,965     $ 1,009       1.93 %
    Money market deposits     489,525       4,313       3.53 %     337,937       3,320       3.95 %
    Savings deposits     188,999       404       0.86 %     192,577       305       0.64 %
    Certificates of deposit     297,727       2,719       3.66 %     333,542       3,789       4.57 %
    Short-term borrowings     77,666       870       4.49 %     138,656       1,920       5.57 %
    Other borrowings     11,588       140       4.85 %     11,791       173       5.90 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     1,283,364       9,799       3.06 %     1,224,468       10,516       3.45 %
    Noninterest-bearing liabilities:                                                
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits     397,493                       396,626                  
    Other liabilities     13,094                       17,042                  
    Stockholders’ equity     214,144                       205,379                  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 1,908,095                     $ 1,843,514                  
    Net interest income           $ 17,437                     $ 15,083          
    Interest rate spread (4)                     2.97 %                     2.48 %
    Net interest margin (5)                     3.88 %                     3.52 %
    Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities                     142.49 %                     143.50 %
    (1) Tax-equivalent adjustments to calculate the yield on tax-exempt securities and loans were $266 and  $289 for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
    (2) Yield is calculated on the basis of amortized cost.
    (3) Includes dividends received on restricted stock.
    (4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
        For the Three Months Ended  
        June 30,     March 31,  
        2025     2025  
        Average             Average     Average             Average  
        Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost     Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost  
    Interest-earning assets:                                                
    Loans receivable (1)   $ 1,576,050     $ 25,122       6.40 %   $ 1,537,337     $ 23,387       6.17 %
    Investment securities (1) (2)     191,619       1,486       3.64 %     191,996       1,490       3.69 %
    Interest-earning deposits with other banks (3)     61,012       628       4.13 %     67,661       596       3.57 %
    Total interest-earning assets     1,828,681       27,236       6.03 %     1,796,994       25,473       5.81 %
    Noninterest-earning assets     79,414                       84,542                  
    Total assets   $ 1,908,095                     $ 1,881,536                  
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                                                
    Interest-bearing demand deposits   $ 217,859     $ 1,353       2.49 %   $ 220,192     $ 1,154       2.13 %
    Money market deposits     489,525       4,313       3.53 %     458,446       3,816       3.38 %
    Savings deposits     188,999       404       0.86 %     192,931       388       0.82 %
    Certificates of deposit     297,727       2,719       3.66 %     261,006       2,527       3.93 %
    Short-term borrowings     77,666       870       4.49 %     120,238       1,347       4.54 %
    Other borrowings     11,588       140       4.85 %     11,639       143       4.98 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     1,283,364       9,799       3.06 %     1,264,452       9,375       3.01 %
    Noninterest-bearing liabilities:                                                
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits     397,493                       390,354                  
    Other liabilities     13,094                       14,265                  
    Stockholders’ equity     214,144                       212,465                  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 1,908,095                     $ 1,881,536                  
    Net interest income           $ 17,437                     $ 16,098          
    Interest rate spread (4)                     2.97 %                     2.80 %
    Net interest margin (5)                     3.88 %                     3.69 %
    Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities                     142.49 %                     142.12 %
    (1)  Tax-equivalent adjustments to calculate the yield on tax-exempt securities and loans were $266 and $272 for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively.
    (2) Yield is calculated on the basis of amortized cost.
    (3) Includes dividends received on restricted stock.
    (4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
        For the Six Months Ended  
        June 30,     June 30,  
        2025     2024  
        Average             Average     Average             Average  
        Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost     Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost  
    Interest-earning assets:                                                
    Loans receivable (1)   $ 1,556,693     $ 48,509       6.29 %   $ 1,489,992     $ 45,817       6.19 %
    Investment securities (1) (2)     191,807       2,976       3.67 %     191,801       2,910       3.59 %
    Interest-earning deposits with other banks (3)     64,336       1,224       3.84 %     63,015       1,484       4.74 %
    Total interest-earning assets     1,812,836       52,709       5.92 %     1,744,808       50,211       5.85 %
    Noninterest-earning assets     81,979                       88,291                  
    Total assets   $ 1,894,815                     $ 1,833,099                  
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                                                
    Interest-bearing demand deposits   $ 219,026     $ 2,506       2.31 %   $ 210,487     $ 1,986       1.90 %
    Money market deposits     473,985       8,130       3.46 %     318,208       6,147       3.88 %
    Savings deposits     190,965       792       0.84 %     196,828       594       0.61 %
    Certificates of deposit     279,366       5,246       3.79 %     333,706       7,162       4.32 %
    Short-term borrowings     98,952       2,217       4.52 %     141,507       3,913       5.56 %
    Other borrowings     11,614       283       4.91 %     11,815       357       6.08 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     1,273,908       19,174       3.04 %     1,212,551       20,159       3.34 %
    Noninterest-bearing liabilities:                                                
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits     393,923                       398,417                  
    Other liabilities     13,749                       16,801                  
    Stockholders’ equity     213,235                       205,330                  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 1,894,815                     $ 1,833,099                  
    Net interest income           $ 33,535                     $ 30,052          
    Interest rate spread (4)                     2.88 %                     2.51 %
    Net interest margin (5)                     3.79 %                     3.53 %
    Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities                     142.31 %                     143.90 %
    (1)  Tax-equivalent adjustments to calculate the yield on tax-exempt securities and loans were $538 and $570 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively.
    (2) Yield is calculated on the basis of amortized cost.
    (3) Includes dividends received on restricted stock.
    (4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
       
    Company Contact: Investor and Media Contact:
    Ronald L. Zimmerly, Jr.
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    Middlefield Banc Corp.
    (419) 673-1217
    rzimmerly@middlefieldbank.com 
    Andrew M. Berger
    Managing Director
    SM Berger & Company, Inc.
    (216) 464-6400
    andrew@smberger.com 

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Crapo Statement at Treasury, HHS Nominations Hearing

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Idaho Mike Crapo
    Washington, D.C.—U.S. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) delivered the following remarks at a nomination hearing to consider Jonathan McKernan to be an Under Secretary of the Treasury and Alex Adams of Idaho to be Assistant Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary for Family Support.
    As prepared for delivery:
    “Thank you to our nominees, Mr. McKernan and Dr. Adams, for being here today. Congratulations on your nominations and thank you both for your willingness to serve.
    “Today, we will first hear from Jonathan McKernan who is nominated to serve as the Under Secretary for Domestic Finance at the Treasury Department.
    “The Domestic Finance office develops policies and guidance for Treasury Department activities in areas involving financial institutions, federal debt finance, financial regulation and capital markets. Sensible guidance in these areas better ensures financial stability and the growth and resilience of our economy.
    “Mr. McKernan has a demonstrated track record of support for sound and balanced regulation. As a member of the Board of Directors at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Mr. McKernan opposed burdensome rulemakings, such as the Basel III Endgame Proposal, which would have hindered economic growth and reduced lending to households and businesses.
    “He also served in senior advisory roles on the staff of the Senate Banking Committee, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and the Treasury Department.
    “Mr. McKernan, I look forward to working with you, if confirmed, to bolster and protect our domestic financial system.
    “We will also hear from Dr. Alex Adams–from Eagle, Idaho–who is nominated to serve as the Assistant Secretary for Family Support, which oversees the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
    “ACF plays a vital role in supporting some of America’s most vulnerable populations, including foster care and adoption assistance, both of which have garnered bipartisan interest from this Committee. It is imperative that this agency is led by someone with a deep understanding of these complex issues, a commitment to sound fiscal management, and a proven track record of delivering results.
    “Dr. Adams’ service as the Director of Idaho’s Department of Health and Welfare has prepared him to lead ACF. He has overseen a staff of nearly 3,000 individuals and an annual budget of $5.5 billion and delivered clear results for Idahoans.
    “As Director, Dr. Adams placed a strong emphasis on child welfare, working with the Idaho State Legislature to enact laws to extend foster care to age 23, allow kin-specific licensing standards, and enhance time to permanency.
    “Dr. Adams also has a strong record on budget and efficiency, having served as Governor Little’s budget and regulatory director. He has demonstrated a keen eye toward fiscal responsibility, reducing regulatory burden and maximizing the impact of taxpayer dollars. This experience will be invaluable as he oversees the varied programs under ACF’s purview.
    “His nomination has also received letters of support from a broad range of different stakeholders, which I request to be entered into the record.
    “Thank you again to our nominees for their time today.”
     

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Supporting Water Infrastructure Security and Resilience

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today announced a key milestone to safeguard New York’s water infrastructure by developing nation-leading cybersecurity regulations for water and wastewater systems alongside a new cyber grant program and technical assistance to bolster the security and resilience of water and wastewater systems. Following a collaborative multi-agency development process directed by her 2025 State of the State, the New York State Department of Health (DOH) and New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) released proposed cyber regulations for water and wastewater systems for public comment. In coordination, the Department of Public Service (DPS) also released proposed cyber regulations across water-works corporations, other public utilities, and cable television companies for public comment. The Environmental Facilities Corporation (EFC) is also establishing a new cyber grant program and technical assistance for the water and wastewater systems sector. These threat-informed, risk-centric, and cost-balanced minimum standards and accompanying funding and technical assistance will strengthen the cybersecurity posture of water utilities and protect them from increasingly sophisticated and dangerous cyber attacks.

    “Cyber attacks on critical infrastructure can have devastating impacts on communities, and we must act now to defend our water and wastewater systems with the same urgency and rigor we bring to other critical sectors,” Governor Hochul said. “These new regulations and grant programs reflect our commitment to protecting public health and safety while helping under-resourced entities modernize for a digital age.”

    The agencies worked together to closely align definitions and provisions within each agency’s regulatory and operational requirements, worked to minimize duplicative or conflicting requirements, and streamlined processes. They also aligned regulations with guidance issued by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency for securing information technology and operational technology environments.

    Regulated water and wastewater systems will be required to evaluate risks, deploy cybersecurity controls, and implement network monitoring and logging for the largest systems. Regulated entities will also be required to develop and maintain response and recovery plans to support continuity of operations in the event of cyber attacks and to report cybersecurity incidents.

    Governor Hochul secured another $500 million for clean water infrastructure in this year’s budget, bringing the state’s total investment to $6 billion since 2017. In addition to these investments, $2.5 million in the FY26 Budget funds a new cyber grant program, Strengthening Essential Cybersecurity for Utilities and Resiliency Enhancements (SECURE), dedicated to the water and wastewater sector. This new grant program will provide competitive grants to support cybersecurity risk assessments and hardening efforts focused on and aligned with the new proposed regulatory requirements. The grant opportunities assist water systems by providing them with the needed resources to strengthen their cybersecurity posture, enhance resiliency, and ensure reliable delivery of clean water for New Yorkers.

    Governor Hochul is again expanding the Community Assistance Teams to provide free, expert guidance and tools to help water systems implement cybersecurity best practices in a way that is cost-effective and sustainable. Communities can continue to request a one-on-one consultation with the Teams about their water infrastructure needs, now including cybersecurity. A new Cybersecurity Hub is now available on the EFC’S website to help communities immediately start fortifying their systems. The hub provides training opportunities, recommended actions, and additional resources. This hub will be regularly updated. Communities can continue to request consultations about their water infrastructure needs on the EFC’s website.

    The public release by DOH, DEC, and PSC of the proposed regulations marks the latest step in strengthening the reliability and resilience of New York’s water and wastewater systems. DEC will accept public comments until September 3, 2025; DOH until September 14, 2025; and PSC until September 14, 2025. Once adopted, regulated entities will have until January 1, 2027 to comply with DEC and DOH regulations focused on operational technology and until January 1, 2026 to comply with PSC regulations focused on information technology.

    New York State Chief Cyber Officer Colin Ahern said, “As cyber threats to infrastructure continue to rise, these regulations will help water and wastewater system operators better defend against attacks that could disrupt service, threaten public health, or damage trust. We look forward to reviewing public feedback received by all three agencies before finalizing the regulations to support increased resilience and reliability for New York’s water and wastewater systems.”

    New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation President and CEO Maureen A. Coleman said, “In today’s digital world, we must defend our water and wastewater utilities from cyber attacks that cost money, time, and valuable resources – and can potentially halt water services and threaten public health and the environment. That’s why we’re helping local water systems strengthen their cybersecurity while keeping costs down for communities and ratepayers. Governor Hochul’s initiative reflects New York’s leadership in both cybersecurity and environmental protection, and I’m proud that we are taking swift action to protect our communities.”

    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner Amanda Lefton said, “Thanks to Governor Hochul’s leadership, DEC is proactively enhancing cybersecurity across our wastewater systems to safeguard our environment, public health, and our nation leading investments in this critical infrastructure. DEC is committed to partnering with state agencies and local governments to protect the communities that rely on these essential services every day from cybersecurity threats.”

    New York State Public Service Commission Chair Rory M. Christian said, “Cybersecurity threats to critical infrastructure are growing in number, intensity, and sophistication. One area of concern is Information Technology (IT). IT systems are utilized across all entities regulated by the Commission and a breach of IT cybersecurity can result in the dissemination of private customer data as well as substantial financial losses to companies. Protection of ratepayers and consumers from cybercriminals is a key reason to pursue stringent IT security for all regulated entities that interact with the public, including gas, electric, telecom, steam, and water providers.”

    New York State Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Services Commissioner Jackie Bray said, “As we move further into the digital age, it’s essential we remain laser-focused on strengthening the cyber security of critical infrastructure. Thanks to the leadership of Governor Hochul, the release of these new regulations and grants not only help ensure the security and resilience of water systems in New York, but are charting a path for the rest of the nation to follow.”

    New York State Chief Information Officer and Director of the Office of Information Technology Services Dru Rai said, “If we are committed to having the strongest and most robust cybersecurity protections possible, it will take all of us working together in pursuit of that goal. Thanks to Governor Hochul’s exemplary leadership and establishment of the Joint Security Operations Center, New York is already doing more than ever before to defend state agencies and local governments from a wide array of dangerous cyber threats. However, it is critical that we also provide the resources necessary to fully safeguard New York’s water infrastructure and protect the health and safety of our residents in the communities in which they live. I applaud today’s announcement and thank our partners in government for their good work.”

    New York State Police Superintendent Steven G. James said, “Cyber attacks and the need to continuously implement cyber security measures continues to increase across several entities. The new regulations and grant program are imperative for the evaluation of cyber security threats against our water infrastructure and provide the necessary resources to address them head-on. I thank Governor Hochul for her support and collaborative approach to identify, confront, and contain the cyber threats we face in New York State.”

    New York State Health Commissioner Dr. James McDonald said, “Protecting public health starts with ensuring the safety and reliability of the systems that deliver clean water to New Yorkers. These first-in-the-nation cybersecurity regulations, along with new funding to strengthen and modernize our infrastructure, reflect Governor Hochul’s commitment to preparing for evolving threats and ensuring our water systems can recover quickly and continue serving communities safely.”

    The new grant program and proposed regulations for the water and wastewater systems sector is the latest step taken by Governor Hochul to strengthen cyber defenses statewide and ensure the resiliency of New York’s critical infrastructure. Under Governor Hochul’s leadership, New York has led the nation in developing smart and effective cybersecurity policy — including establishing nation-leading financial sector regulations, signing landmark legislation to protect New York’s energy grid from cyber threats, strengthening cybersecurity across New York’s municipalities, implementing first-in-the-nation hospital cybersecurity minimum standards, and issuing the first-ever Statewide Cybersecurity Strategy.

    Senator Chuck Schumer said, “We must do all we can to protect our vital water infrastructure assets, like dams and drinking water, from cyber attack. That is why I’m pleased that new cybersecurity regulations for New York’s water and wastewater systems and a new grant program will help our communities meet federal standards and build a safer, more resilient New York. When it comes to fighting off cyberattacks, we must work arm-in-arm with state and local governments to prevent future hacks. I’m grateful for Governor Hochul’s partnership in identifying where we are vulnerable and ramping up our joint security efforts.”

    Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said, “Protecting our nation’s water systems against cyber attacks is a vital component of our national security, but the sector has long struggled to implement necessary cybersecurity protections. I am grateful that these new regulations and grants will drive necessary change in this sector and help defend our state from crippling attacks targeting essential services. I remain committed to ensuring New York is ready to defend itself against cyber threats and will continue to fight to deliver the resources our state needs to protect our critical infrastructure.”

    Assemblymember Steve Otis said, “Increasing cybersecurity protection for our critical infrastructure has been a major priority of Governor Hochul and the Legislature. Through the Governor’s release of the NYS Cybersecurity Strategy in 2023 and the passage of legislation and budgetary support, we are improving our defenses against the always evolving threats. The release of draft regulations for water and wastewater operators is the vital next step to protect the health, safety, and security of all New Yorkers. As a longtime supporter of New York’s nation-leading water infrastructure funding and as an advocate for robust cybersecurity protections, I am very appreciative of the Governor’s efforts here and the great work of New York’s environmental, health, and cybersecurity agencies.”

    These initiatives underline the Governor’s commitment to build a safer and more resilient New York, including online. Over the last three years, Governor Hochul has made foundational investments in New York’s cybersecurity by establishing the NYS Joint Security Operations Center (JSOC), standing up the statewide cybersecurity shared services program for counties and municipalities, and expanding the state’s law enforcement cyber capabilities by growing the Computer Crimes Unit, Cyber Analysis Unit, and Internet Crimes Against Children Center at the New York State Police.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Pharmacist Led Strep Throat and Ear Infection Pilot Seeing Success

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Released on July 22, 2025

    Results from a pilot project launched in January 2025 allowing participating pharmacists to conduct point-of-care testing for strep throat and assess for ear infections has delivered over 3,000 services across Saskatchewan, demonstrating the value of expanding pharmacists’ roles in providing accessible frontline care.

    This is part of a broader effort to improve primary care access, especially in rural and remote areas. Pharmacists at select locations across the province have been trained to assess symptoms, perform rapid testing for strep throat, and determine appropriate treatment options, including prescribing medication when appropriate.

    As of July 13, the total number of patients assessed at participating pharmacies was 3,135, with 745 for sore throat and 2,390 for suspected ear infections. Nearly 53 percent, or 1,640 of the cases did not require a prescription, highlighting the benefit of clinical evaluation.

    “This pilot is one of the first in Canada and shows that pharmacists play a vital role in enhancing access to timely care for common conditions,” Rural and Remote Health Minister Lori Carr said. “The fast access to assessment and treatment is reassuring to patients and strengthens team-based primary health care in the province.”

    More than 140 pharmacists taking part in this program have been trained to meet competency requirements as established by the Saskatchewan College of Pharmacy Professionals (SCPP) to provide these services. 11 pharmacies have been conducting strep throat testing and assessing for ear infections, while another 35 sites have been offering assessment for ear infection only. 

    “Saskatchewan College of Pharmacy Professionals is proud of the profession’s leadership in this pilot, which reflects not only pharmacists’ strong clinical competence but also the robust training and standards guiding their care,” SCPP President Scott Livingstone said. “This initiative has been built on collaboration with experts in the field and regulators and is a testament to the profession’s commitment to safe, patient-centred care.”

    Saskatchewan pharmacists were first granted the authority to prescribe for three minor ailments in 2012. Since then, the list of minor ailments has grown to 31. A list of participating pharmacies and communities, and the full list of conditions is available at the Saskatchewan College of Pharmacy Professionals website.  

    This initiative builds on the pharmacist expansion of scope and training announced in September 2024 and is guided by the province’s Health Human Resources Action Plan to recruit, train, incentivize and retain more health care workers in Saskatchewan.    

    “I am confident that this pilot has demonstrated a meaningful impact and that full implementation could be a sustainable, long-term solution for Saskatchewan’s healthcare system” Rexall Moose Jaw Pharmacy Services Manager Chad Miskiman said. “Moreover, this has significantly enhanced trust and credibility among pharmacy patients, as reflected in the substantial positive feedback we have received from the community.”

    There are almost 1,300 practising pharmacists in more than 430 licensed community pharmacies in Saskatchewan. In many communities, pharmacies are the first point of contact for health care services. Based on these early results and further evaluation, the program may be expanded to additional pharmacies in the future. 

    -30-

    For more information, contact:

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: New Jersey Doctor Charged with Distributing Opioids in Exchange for Sexual Favors and Defrauding New Jersey Medicaid

    Source: US FBI

    NEWARK, N.J. – A New Jersey doctor was charged with distributing opioids without a legitimate medical purpose, soliciting sexual favors from patients in exchange for opioid prescriptions, and defrauding New Jersey Medicaid by billing for visits that never happened, U.S. Attorney Alina Habba announced.

    Ritesh Kalra, 51, of Secaucus, New Jersey, was charged in a 5-count Complaint with 3 counts of distributing opioids outside the usual course of professional practice, not for a legitimate medical purpose, and in exchange for sexual favors, and 2 counts of healthcare fraud. Kalra made his initial appearance yesterday before U.S. Magistrate Judge André M. Espinosa in Newark federal court and was released on home incarceration and an unsecured $100,000 bond. He also is prohibited from practicing medicine and prescribing medication and will be required to shut down his medical practice while the case is pending.

    “Physicians hold a position of profound responsibility—but as alleged, Dr. Kalra used that position to fuel addiction, exploit vulnerable patients for sex, and defraud New Jersey’s public healthcare program.  By allegedly exchanging prescriptions for sexual favors and billing Medicaid for ghost appointments, he not only violated the law but endangered lives. Our Office will continue to pursue those who turn their medical licenses into tools for personal gain and sexual gratification.”

    – U.S. Attorney Alina Habba

    “When we seek medical advice and treatment from doctors, we have to assume they have our best interests in mind. This investigation, conducted by the FBI and our partners, illustrates that Dr. Kalra had little regard for actually taking care of his patients. As alleged, he instead used them for his sexual gratification and, in the process, defrauded the state of New Jersey. A patient’s relationship and trust in a physician, while at their most vulnerable, is not something to be exploited for personal gain. We are asking anyone who may be a victim or knows someone who was treated by Dr. Kalra to get in touch with our office at 1-800-CALL-FBI,” stated Special Agent in Charge Stefanie Roddy.

    “In the fight against the opioid crisis, we often witness the painful struggles of those battling addiction. Rather than offering help, Dr. Kalra exploited his victims at their most vulnerable—using opioids as leverage in exchange for sexual favors—further deepening their addiction and worsening the crisis” stated DEA New Jersey Special Agent in Charge Cheryl Ortiz. “The DEA will continue to work with our partners in making sure those who abuse their professional oath are held accountable.”

    “Physicians who recklessly and illegitimately distribute controlled substances undermine critical efforts to battle the opioid crisis and betray their professional responsibility to serve the health and well-being of the public. As alleged, Dr. Kalra took advantage of individuals struggling with addiction all for his own personal gratification,” said Special Agent in Charge Naomi Gruchacz of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG). “HHS-OIG will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to address such abuse to protect patients, communities, and taxpayers from such dangerous conduct.”

    According to documents filed in the case and statements made in court:

    Dr. Kalra, an internist in Fair Lawn, New Jersey, allegedly operated a pill mill out of his medical office, where he routinely prescribed high-dose opioids—including oxycodone—and promethazine with codeine to patients without a legitimate medical purpose.  Between January 2019 and February 2025, Kalra issued more than 31,000 prescriptions for oxycodone, including days when he wrote upwards of 50 prescriptions.  Several of Kalra’s former employees reported that female patients complained that Kalra touched them sexually and demanded sexual favors of them, including oral sex, in order to obtain their prescriptions.  One patient described being sexually assaulted by Kalra on multiple occasions, including forced anal sex during clinical appointments. Another patient continued to receive opioid prescriptions from Kalra when the patient was incarcerated at Essex County Correctional Facility and had no contact with Dr. Kalra.

    Kalra also allegedly billed for in-person visits and counseling sessions that never occurred.  As part of the health care fraud scheme, Kalra’s electronic medical records allegedly contained false progress notes listing fabricated dates of service, and included examination notes that were generally identical from visit to visit and did not record vital signs.

    Each count of distributing controlled substances carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison and a $1 million fine.  Each count of health care fraud is punishable by a maximum potential penalty of 10 years in prison and a fine of $250,000, or twice the gross profit or loss caused by the offense, whichever is greatest.

    Individuals who believe they may be victims of Dr. Kalra or have information about this case may contact the FBI at 1-800-CALL-FBI (225-5324) or by email at NK-Victim-Assistance@fbi.gov.

    U.S. Attorney Habba credited the following law enforcement organizations with the investigation leading to yesterday’s charges: the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Stefanie Roddy; the Drug Enforcement Administration, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Cheryl Ortiz; the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Naomi Gruchacz; the Internal Revenue Service—Criminal Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Jenifer Piovesan; the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Amy Connelly; the New Jersey Office of the Attorney General Division of Criminal Justice; and the Fair Lawn Police Department.

    The Government is represented by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Katherine M. Romano and Jessica R. Ecker and of the Health Care Fraud and Opioids Enforcement Unit in Newark.

    The charges and allegations contained in the complaint are merely accusations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.

    25-225                                                 ###

    Defense counsel:  Michael Baldassare, Esq. 

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Welch Grills HHS Nominee on Trump Admin’s Plans to Zero Out Funding for LIHEAP 

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Peter Welch (D-Vermont)

    President Trump’s Fiscal Year 2026 budget would end LIHEAP program, which provides heating assistance for more than 26,000 Vermonters 
    WASHINGTON, D.C. — U.S. Senator Peter Welch (D-Vt.), a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, today grilled Dr. Alex Adams, President Trump’s pick to serve as Assistant Secretary for Family Support at the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), about the Trump Administration’s plans to eliminate funding for the Low-Income Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP). LIHEAP helps more than 26,000 Vermonters and 6.2 million Americans afford heat and air conditioning.   

    “LIHEAP is an incredibly important program—it’s getting zeroed out in the budget. I know that you played a major role in Idaho in administering the LIHEAP program there. It’s really, really important in Vermont in those cold winters,” said Senator Welch. “I’m asking you—as a person who did really good work for the people of Idaho, administering the LIHEAP program—what do you think about zeroing out that program?” 
    Dr. Adams: “Senator, I’ll reiterate what the Secretary said. If Congress funds it, we’ll get the money out the door.” 
    Senator Welch: “But the President is zeroing it out. And you’re not in Congress…you’re working for President Trump, right? So, my question goes back to, what’s your view about zeroing out the LIHEAP program?” 
    Dr. Adams: “So, as a former state budget director, I would say no budget decision is ever made in a vacuum. It has to look at the total picture, and because this is an Administration that’s committed to energy policies, more permits—” 
    Senator Welch: “So you won’t answer, basically.” 

    Watch Senator Welch’s full remarks below: 

    Read a key excerpt from Senator Welch’s exchange with Alex Adams, President Trump’s nominee to serve as Assistant Secretary for Family Support at HHS:  

    Senator Welch: “The whole point of LIHEAP is it’s people who don’t have the resources to participate in the market. They have no control over a) the weather and b) the price of home heating fuel, right?” 
    Dr. Adams: “Senator, I think in states like mine we have policies that prohibit shutting off of utilities for certain critical months. I think you’re going to have to take into account the nuances and all the other factors in the market.”  
    Senator Welch: “I’ll just say candidly: I really admire the work you did in Idaho on the LIHEAP program, among other things, and I’m really disappointed in your—from my perspective—lack of candor about what your view is about zeroing out a program that you worked really hard on.” 

    In May, the Vermont Congressional Delegation pushed back against the Trump Administration’s plans to eliminate the LIHEAP and terminate employees at HHS who distribute the funding. The Delegation previously called on Secretary of HHS Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to immediately reinstate the staff of the Division of Energy Assistance at HHS and disburse funding to states for LIHEAP. They have yet to receive a reply. 
    Learn more about Senator Welch’s work by visiting his website or by following him on social media. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Deputy Secretary-General’s remarks at the Joint ECOSOC and UN-Habitat High-Level Dialogue on Adequate Housing for all [as prepared for delivery]

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    Honourable Patty Hadju, Minister of Jobs and Families of Canada. 
    His Excellency, Bob Rae, President of ECOSOC
    Her Excellency Beatrice Karago, Deputy Permanent Representative of The Republic of Kenya to UN-Habitat
    Excellencies,
    Ladies and gentlemen,
    It is a privilege to join you today for this important dialogue.
    I thank the President of ECOSOC and UN-Habitat for convening us at such a critical moment.
    Let me begin with a simple question: What did it take for us to be here today?
    We woke up somewhere safe.
    We had an address where documents could reach us, where our families knew to find us.
    We had a place to eat a meal, charge our phones, and prepare for this day.
    For almost three billion people on our planet, none of that is guaranteed.
    This is why today’s dialogue – at this critical moment during the High-Level Political Forum – matters so urgently.
    Housing is not simply about a roof over one’s head.
    It is a fundamental human right and the foundation upon which peace itself rests.
    Sustainable development and sustainable peace are inseparable.
    Today, in an increasingly urbanized world, almost three billion people still live in inadequate conditions, in informal settlements, overcrowded housing, or with no shelter at all.
    Among them are more than 120 million refugees and internally displaced persons – families torn from their homes by conflict, persecution, and violence.
    When homes are destroyed, when families are forced to flee, when communities are uprooted, we witness how housing becomes both a casualty and weapon of war.
    In Gaza, in Ukraine, in Sudan, in Yemen, in Myanmar, and beyond, we have seen this time and again.
    There is no safe housing in rubble, and without shelter, we lose the very basis of social cohesion and stability that makes peace possible.
    This crisis touches every Sustainable Development Goal we’ve committed to achieving by 2030.
    We often say that home is where the heart is.
    Our work on housing sits at the very heart of the Sustainable Development Goals, and when we secure adequate housing for all, we nurture the conditions where every other goal can flourish.
    We know that when people have access to safe, adequate, and affordable housing, children perform better in school.
    Workers are more productive.
    Health outcomes improve dramatically.
    Decent work becomes accessible.
    Communities become more resilient to the forces that fuel conflict and division.
    And while adequate housing cannot eliminate gender-based violence within the home, it reduces women and girls’ exposure to violence in public spaces.
    So, the reality is that the ambition of the 2030 Agenda to leave no one behind begins with something as fundamental as a safe place to call home.
    By 2030, 60% of the world’s population will live in cities, rising to nearly 70% by 2050.
    We have the tools and the commitment to grow cities, not slums—guided by the New Urban Agenda’ call for planned, inclusive urbanization that ensures housing, services, and dignity for all.
    Success or failure to deliver on our commitments will depend on our ability to act urgently and work together.
    At the Financing for Development Forum, Member States rightly called for bold reforms and investments to strengthen the social contract. That must include housing, not as a standalone project, but as a driver of inclusive development.
    The Pact for the Future reaffirmed the 2030 Agenda and gave us a mandate to make multilateralism deliver in the lives of people, in the neighbourhoods where they live.
    It also gave us a mandate to prevent conflict and sustain peace – and housing sits at the intersection of both.
    Later this year, the Second World Social Summit offers us an opportunity to reaffirm that housing is critical for social protection, decent work, access to services, and essential to building a just and cohesive society.
    It is also an opportunity to recognize housing as a pillar of conflict prevention and peacebuilding.
    As Chair of the UN Sustainable Development Group, I see how country teams are working every day with governments, civil society and local and regional governments to advance these goals.
    But we need to do more.
    Concretely, that means aligning political commitment and financing with the urgency and scale of the challenge.
    It means investing in adequate housing, not just as development infrastructure, but peace infrastructure.  
    We also need to bring to the centre those who are too often pushed to the margins: women, young people, older persons, persons with disabilities, Indigenous Peoples, displaced populations, and people living in homelessness.
    Their voices and experiences must inform the policies and solutions because they know what works, what’s missing, and they can inform the solutions we need to scale.
    They also know intimately the connections between displacement, insecurity, and conflict.
    Their involvement is the best measure of our commitment to equity, dignity, and human rights.

    Ladies and gentlemen,
    The first place where opportunity begins or where it is denied is not an office building or a school – it’s a home.
    Together, let’s deliver not only shelter, but lasting solutions that offer security and a path to prosperity.
    Not only four walls and a roof, but the opportunity to live in dignity.
    Thank you.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    July 23, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 22 23 24 25 26 … 608
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress