Category: Health

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: ELECTRIC VEHICLE TRANSPORTATION FOR HOSPITAL OXYGEN SERVICES

    Source: Government of Samoa

    KEYNOTE SPEECH by the Minister of Works, Transport & Infrastructure – Hon. Olo Fiti Afoa Vaai [April 10, 2025]

    Your Excellency, Aliona Niculita, the Resident Representative of UNDP Samoa Country Office,

    Your Exellency, Ryotaro Suzuki, Ambassador, Government of Japan

    Distinguished Guests,

    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    I am indeed extremely privileged and humbled to address this important ceremony for the handing over of the much needed and immensely valued e-truck and charger to support the administration of TTM Hospital Oxygen Plants services and transportation of oxygen cylinders from our main oxygen plant here to other health facilities both in Upolu and Savaii.

    I believe this electric-truck is one of the e-vehicles procured under the Climate Action Pathways for Island Transport project implemented by the Government of Samoa through the leadership of the Ministry of Works, Transport and Infrastructure in close partnership with UNDP and funded by the Government of Japan.

    The procurement of this electric-truck is increasingly important for oxygen plant administration due to their potential to reduce emissions, lower operating costs and improve air quality, especially in areas where oxygen plants often operate.

    I applaud the fact that this is the first time ever that this electric truck has been specially manufactured and reconfigured to cater the need of MOH, for a specialized truck to transport oxygen cylinders from the TTM Hospital Oxygen Plant to rural health facilities.

    Most importantly, it is Samoa’s commitment to expected outcomes of the Pathway for the Development of Samoa 2021-2026 in placing emphasis on Samoa’s efforts towards decarbonization and enhancement of health services provision.

    On behalf of Samoa government and its people, I would like to take this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude to UNDP and Government of Japan for your never-ending support. This handover is another good example of how we can continue working together and fostering our partnership in finding solutions for challenges that confront the health of our people on a daily basis.

    I have no doubt that this pivotal assistance, will go a long way to save lives and improve the quality of life of all our people, by ensuring sufficient oxygen supplies to all health facilities in Samoa.

    To this end, I would like to reiterate my deepest appreciation to our development partners who had kindly provide this assistance for us, not forgetting our local counterparts who had worked together in facilitating and negotiation of such important assistance to support the provision of quality and safe health support services for our people.

    Ladies and gentlemen, it is my pleasure to celebrate with you this addition of e-vehicles provided by UNDP and Government of Japan through Climate Action Pathways for Island Transport project for Samoa, and look forward to receiving more e-vehicles in the coming years, and continue to receive more support from our partners to promote health and wellbeing of our people.

    Soifua ma ia manuia.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Fee schedule for public healthcare services gazetted to take effect on January 1 next year

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    Fee schedule for public healthcare services gazetted to take effect on January 1 next year 
    The HHB spokesperson emphasised that the Government is implementing the healthcare system reform in a holistic manner, of which public healthcare fees and charges is an integral part. The reform will be based on five key principles:
     
    (i) Commitment will not be lessened: The Government’s commitment to public health will remain unchanged. All gains from the reform will be wholly utilised for public healthcare services; 
    (ii) Co-payment for those who can afford it and for those with mild conditions: The Government will reasonably expand and enhance the co-payment mechanism; 
    (iii) Enhancement and reduction: Protection for “poor, acute, serious, critical” patients will be enhanced, and wastage will be reduced; 
    (iv) High subsidisation: The high level of subsidy will be maintained after the reform, with the target of maintaining the 90 per cent overall public subsidisation rate; and 
    (v) Gradual and orderly progress: The objective will be achieved in a progressive and orderly manner in five years.  
    Following the announcement of the Public Healthcare Fees and Charges Reform on March 25, the HHB and the HA have been actively engaging with the Legislative Council, members of the public, and various stakeholders to explain the reform details and gather feedback on the reform direction. There is a consensus across society that Hong Kong’s current public healthcare subsidisation structure cannot cope with increasing service demands driven by demographic changes and healthcare developments. This necessitates reform of the public healthcare subsidisation structure to modify healthcare service utilisation patterns, achieve precise allocation of medical resources, reduce wastage and misuse of medical resources, and strengthen protection for those most in need.
     
    Apart from restructuring subsidisation levels for various services, the public healthcare fees and charges reform emphasises enhanced healthcare protection, including enhancing the medical fee waiver mechanism, introducing a cap on annual spending, and strengthening protection for patients with critical illnesses regarding drugs and medical devices. As such, public healthcare will be reinforced as a safety net for all, which is also becoming larger, more stable, thicker and denser, to enhance protection for “poor, acute, serious, critical” patients. It is expected that the enhanced medical fee waiving mechanism will expand eligible beneficiaries from 0.3 million to 1.4 million underprivileged individuals, while the annual spending cap will benefit 70 000 patients with serious illnesses. More patients with critical illnesses, including those from middle-income families, will receive subsidies for drugs and medical devices.
     
    The HA spokesperson said, “The HA’s next steps will focus on refining implementation measures to ensure the smooth execution of the reform, including streamlining application procedures for medical fee waivers and relaxing the eligibility criteria of means test for the Samaritan Fund safety net, and establishing information platforms to help members of the public understand and utilise the new healthcare protection measures starting next year. On April 28, the HA will launch a means test calculator on the HA website and mobile application ‘HA Go’ (See Attachment). By inputting information about household income and assets, members of the public can make a preliminary estimation of their eligibility for medical fee waiving and safety net applications under the new healthcare protection measures to be implemented next year.”
     
    The spokesperson added that the Primary Healthcare Commission (PHC Commission) will actively develop primary healthcare to complement the reform, encouraging appropriate utilisation of community primary healthcare networks. The HA will continue to increase the capacity of family medicine outpatient services, with a priority to serve underprivileged groups including low-income families and the elderly living in poverty. Through cross-district collaboration and flexible resource allocation, evening and holiday outpatient services will be increased, focusing on districts with high demand. The PHC Commission and the HA will also collaborate with private healthcare institutions to compile information about private hospitals and primary healthcare clinics providing evening and holiday services, making this information available through various channels including eHealth and at Accident and Emergency (A&E) departments to help members of the public access service options beyond A&E. Starting January 1 next year, when the new A&E fee ($400) takes effect, the HA will simultaneously regularise the special A&E refund arrangements. While waiting for consultation after triage nurses conduct triage and preliminary medical assessments, patients who choose to seek treatment at other healthcare institutions may apply for a $350 refund.
     
    The HA is also reviewing fees for non-eligible persons, private services in public hospitals, and remaining individual fee items for public healthcare services. Further announcements will be made upon completion of the review.
    Issued at HKT 18:40

    NNNN

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Viksit Vibrant Villages Program to Take Place From 15th to 30th May 2025; Registrations on MY Bharat Platform Started from 23rd April

    Source: Government of India

    Viksit Vibrant Villages Program to Take Place From 15th to 30th May 2025; Registrations on MY Bharat Platform Started from 23rd April

    500 MY Bharat Youth Volunteers from Across Country to Work Directly with Communities in 100 Selected Villages of Leh-Ladakh, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand

    Program to Empower Youth to Take Lead in Giving New Identity to Border Villages and Transform India’s Frontier Communities

    Posted On: 25 APR 2025 2:16PM by PIB Delhi

    The Viksit Vibrant Villages Program is a joint initiative aimed at revitalizing India’s remote border regions. Spearheaded by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports, in coordination with the Ministry of Home Affairs, the program will be implemented with support from local governance bodies and the Indo-Tibetan Border Police (ITBP). It will focus on Leh-Ladakh, Himachal Pradesh, and Uttarakhand, taking place from 15th to 30th May 2025.

    This initiative will empower youth by involving 500 MY Bharat volunteers from across the country, who will work directly with communities in 100 selected villages. These volunteers will drive grassroots engagement and community development through a variety of initiatives, ranging from educational support and infrastructure enhancement to healthcare and cultural preservation. By engaging local residents and leveraging the strength of youth leadership, the program aims to bring long-lasting, positive transformation to these border areas.

    Registration for the Viksit Vibrant Villages Program officially commenced on 23rd April 2025 via the MY Bharat Portal. Volunteers from across India are encouraged to apply for this transformative opportunity. 10 MY Bharat volunteers will be selected from the Union Territories and 15 from each participating state. In total, 500 volunteers will be chosen to serve as the backbone of the program, leading and coordinating activities within the villages.

    As part of this program, immersive learning journeys, cultural exchange programs, and grassroots development projects are being rolled out, allowing the youth to directly interact with the unique socio-cultural and strategic fabric of India’s border regions.

    The program will unfold over 7 days, with each day dedicated to a distinct domain of community development. The activities will include, but are not limited to:

    1. Community Engagement

    2. Youth Leadership Development

    3. Cultural Promotion

    4. Healthcare Awareness and Support

    5. Skill-building and Education

    6. Environment Protection Best Practices

    7. Career Counselling Sessions

    8. Fitness Activities like Sports, Yoga, Meditation, etc

    9. Open Mic, Essay, Fireside Chat, etc on My Dream India

    Knowledge Transfer and National Consciousness

    Through this program, young citizens will have the opportunity to explore and document the heritage, resilience, and potential of border communities. These experiences, when shared through digital platforms, community discussions, and institutional presentations, will ensure that the voices of India’s frontier residents reach wider national and global audiences.

    The initiative encourages youth to not only witness but actively contribute to the development of these areas – be it through innovative projects in education, entrepreneurship, sustainable agriculture, or local governance. This interaction cultivates mutual respect, deeper national unity, and the emergence of border villages as ‘cultural beacons’ rather than isolated outposts.

    From Forgotten to Celebrated: Giving Border Villages a New Identity

    The program seeks to dismantle the long-held stereotype of border villages being “the last on the map.” Instead, it celebrates them as ‘first villages’ in the journey toward Viksit Bharat  by 2047. Through sustained youth involvement, these villages will be given a platform to showcase their language, art, music, architecture, and stories – redefining their identity from that of a geopolitical buffer to centers of heritage, innovation, and national pride. The Viksit Vibrant Villages program is not just a government effort – it is a generational mission to ensure that development, identity, and dignity ow to every corner of the country, with the youth leading the way.

    To kick-start this initiative, the Ministry will conduct an orientation program in Delhi, where all selected volunteers will undergo an intensive briefing and training session. This orientation will ensure that the volunteers are well-prepared to carry out the program’s objectives and equipped with the necessary knowledge to engage with local communities effectively. The orientation program will provide a unique opportunity for the volunteers to develop crucial leadership skills, gain deeper insights into rural community needs, and learn how to coordinate their efforts with the local governance systems.

    This structure aims to provide a well-rounded learning experience for volunteers, ensuring that they not only contribute to village transformation but also grow personally and professionally throughout the program. This initiative will serve as a catalyst for positive change in the border regions of India, empowering the youth to become active participants in nation-building. By providing youth with the platform to engage directly with local communities, the program seeks to foster a spirit of National integration, cultural pride, and strategic development.

    *****

    Himanshu Pathak

    (Release ID: 2124248) Visitor Counter : 39

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: “HA Risk Alert” latest issue published

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    The following is issued on behalf of the Hospital Authority:

         The 77th issue of “HA Risk Alert” was published today (April 25) by the Hospital Authority (HA) as a risk management and communication initiative to further strengthen the reporting and monitoring of clinical incidents in public hospitals.
     
         In the fourth quarter of 2024 (October to December), there were seven sentinel events reported, comprising four cases of retained instruments/material after surgery/interventional procedure, two cases of inpatient suicide and one case of a surgery/interventional procedure involving wrong body parts. Among the 31 reported serious untoward events, there were 29 related to medication errors and two patient misidentifications.
     
         “Subsequent to the incident reviews and analyses of the root causes of these incidents, important lessons for patient safety have been identified, while recommendations are made and shared in this publication to avoid similar events in the future,” an HA spokesperson said.
     
         The HA Head Office has released the latest “HA Risk Alert” to all staff. It can also be accessed by the public at www.ha.org.hk/riskalert. “HA Risk Alert” is published on a quarterly basis and posted on the HA website in January, April, July and October. The next issue is scheduled for July 2025.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Social care services to 800 adults set to return to the council

    Source: City of Salford

    • Adult social care services delivered by Aspire to return to the council.
    • 10-month transition period until 31 March 2026 to enable the changes to be planned and delivered.
    • Consultation period will ensure that continuity of services remain in place for people receiving support and their families.

    Adult social care services delivered to more than 800 residents in Salford are set to return to be delivered in-house by the city council.

    The services have been delivered by community interest company Aspire for Intelligent Care and Support since 2015, with around 350 staff providing 744,000 hours of care a year for adults with care needs including learning disabilities, dementia and care for older people.

    The decision, made by Salford City Council’s cabinet on Tuesday (22 April), will include a 10-month transition period until 31 March 2026 to enable the changes to be planned and delivered in consultation with staff involved and in partnership with Aspire to ensure that continuity of services remain in place for people receiving support and their families.

    The decision follows on from a pledge in the council’s Corporate Plan 2024-2028 and values the people who work in adult social care while protecting services that support people in living independent and fulfilled lives in Salford.

    Councillor John Merry, cabinet member for adult social care and health, said: “Following our pledge to work toward in-sourcing social care and the commitment in the council’s Corporate Plan 2024-28 to protect services that support our residents in Salford, significant work has been underway to develop recommendations on how to take this forward. The cabinet decision means that adult social care services currently being delivered under contract by Aspire will come back to the council’s adult social care directorate from April 2026. We are committed to working closely with Aspire and all staff involved to successfully manage the transition period.

    “The services delivered by Aspire over the past 10 years have been an asset to the city, and we have seen a dedicated workforce provide high quality care and support to residents. We are excited about welcoming the Aspire team back into the council and learning from all the teams and their wealth of experience in terms of growing the services offered in the city.

    “While we recognise the value the council places on social care and the drive to protect and professionalise the sector, we understand that this will mean a period of change for staff involved and every support will be provided to manage the transition. The knowledge, expertise and enthusiasm of Aspire staff will be of critical importance as we move back under council control and staff views and opinions will continue to be heard through the transition phase, and will continue when the services move back to the council.”

    Lisa Dickinson, chief executive of Aspire for Intelligent Care and Support, said: “We are committed to working with the council through this transition period, while supporting our staff and ensuring that residents continue to receive the high quality of services required to meet their needs.”

    Salford City Council is committed to creating a fairer, greener, healthier and more inclusive city for all. To achieve this vision, it has set out seven interconnected priorities as the focus for our work from 2024 to 2028.

    • Good growth
    • A good home for all
    • Tackling poverty and inequality
    • Creating places where people want to live
    • A child friendly city
    • Responding to climate change
    • Healthy lives and quality of care for all.

    Find out more about our ambitions and how we intend to deliver them in our corporate plan, This is our Salford, at www.salford.gov.uk/this-is-our-salford

    The plan builds on past successes and continues to find new and innovative ways to improve residents’ lives.

    Salford continues its remarkable story of transformation with already much to celebrate as a city – more well-paid jobs, new affordable and social homes, thriving local schools, award-winning green spaces, iconic infrastructure, cleaner transport, more integrated health and care and a vibrant cultural scene.

    Share this


    Date published
    Friday 25 April 2025

    Press and media enquiries

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Global: Malaria scorecard: battles have been won and advances made, but the war isn’t over

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Shüné Oliver, Medical scientist, National Institute for Communicable Diseases

    Sub-Saharan Africa continues to bear the brunt of malaria cases in the world. In this region 11 countries account for two-thirds of the global burden.

    World Malaria Day is marked on 25 April. What progress has been made against the disease, where are the gaps and what’s being done to plug them?

    As scientists who research malaria in Africa, we believe that the continent can defeat the disease. New, effective tools have been added to the malaria toolbox.

    Researchers and malaria programmes, however, must strengthen collaborations. This will ensure the limited resources are used in ways that make the most impact.

    The numbers

    Some progress has been made, but in some cases there have been reverses.

    • Between 2000 and 2015 there was an 18% reduction in new cases from 262 million in 2000 to 214 million in 2015. Since then, progress has stalled.

    • The World Health Organization estimates that approximately 2.2 billion cases have been prevented between 2000 and 2023. Additionally, 12.7 million deaths have been avoided. In 2025, 45 countries are certified as malaria free. Only nine of those countries are in Africa. These include Egypt, Seychelles and Lesotho.

    • The global target set by the WHO was to reduce new cases by 75% compared to cases in 2015. Africa should have reported approximately 47,000 cases in 2023. Instead there were 246 million.

    • Almost every African country with ongoing malaria transmission experienced an increase in malaria cases in 2023. Exceptions to this were Rwanda and Liberia.

    So why is progress stagnating and in many cases reversing?

    The setbacks

    Effective malaria control is extremely challenging. Malaria parasite and mosquito populations evolve rapidly. This makes them difficult to control.

    Africa is home to malaria mosquitoes that prefer biting humans to other animals. These mosquitoes have also adapted to avoid insecticide-treated surfaces.

    It has been shown in South Africa that mosquitoes may feed on people inside their homes, but will avoid resting on the sprayed walls.

    Mosquitoes have also developed mechanisms to resist the effects of insecticides. Malaria vector resistance to certain insecticides used in malaria control is widespread in endemic areas. Resistance levels vary around Africa.

    Resistance to the pyrethroid class is most common. Organophosphate resistance is rare, but present in west Africa. As mosquitoes become resistant to the chemicals used for mosquito control, both the spraying of houses and insecticide treated nets become less effective. However, in regions with high malaria cases, nets still provide physical protection despite resistance.

    An additional challenge is that malaria parasites continue to develop resistance to anti-malarial drugs. In 2007 the first evidence began to emerge in south-east Asia that parasites were developing resistance to artemisinins. These are key drugs in the fight against malaria.

    Recently this has been shown to be happening in some African countries too. Artemisinin resistance has been confirmed in Eritrea, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda. Molecular markers of artemisinin resistance were recently detected in parasites from Namibia and Zambia.

    Malaria parasites have also developed mutations that prevent them from being being detected by the most widely used rapid diagnostic test in Africa.

    Countries in the Horn of Africa, where parasites with these mutations are common, have changed the malaria rapid diagnostic tests used to ensure early diagnosis.

    The progress

    Nevertheless, the fight against malaria has been strengthened by novel control strategies.

    Firstly, after more than 30 years of research, two malaria vaccines – RTS,S and R21 – have finally been approved by the WHO. These are being deployed in 19 African countries.

    These vaccines have reduced disease cases and deaths in the high-risk under-five-years-old age group. They have reduced cases of severe malaria by approximately 30% and deaths by 17%.

    Secondly, effectiveness of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets has been improved.

    New insecticides have been approved for use. Chemical components that help to manage resistance have also been included in the nets.

    Thirdly, novel tools are showing promise. One option is attractive toxic sugar baits. This is because sugar is what mosquitoes naturally eat. Biocontrol by altering the native gut bacteria of mosquitoes may also prove effective.

    Fourthly, reducing mosquito populations by releasing sterilised male or genetically modified mosquitoes into wild mosquito populations is also showing promise. Trials are currently happening in Burkina Faso. Genetically sterilised males have been released on a small scale. This strategy has shown promise in reducing the population.

    Fifthly, two new antimalarials are expected to be available in the next year or two. Artemisinin-based combination therapies are standard treatment for malaria. An improvement to this is triple artemisinin-based combination therapy. This is a combination of this drug with an additional antimalarial. Studies in Africa and Asia have shown these triple combinations to be very effective in controlling malaria.

    The second new antimalarial is the first non-artemisinin-based drug to be developed in over 20 years. Ganaplacide-lumefantrine has been shown to be effective in young children. Once available, it can to be used to treat parasites that are resistant to artemisinin. This is because it has a completely different mechanism of action.

    The end game

    It has been several years since the malaria control toolbox has been strengthened with novel tools and strategies that target both the vector and the parasite. This makes it an ideal time to double down in the fight against this deadly disease.

    In 2020, the WHO identified 25 countries with the potential to stop malaria transmission within their borders by 2025. While none of these countries eliminated malaria, some have made significant progress. Costa Rica and Nepal reported fewer than 100 cases. Timor-Leste reported only one case in recent years.

    Three southern African countries are included in this group: Botswana, Eswatini and South Africa. Unfortunately, all these countries showed increases in cases in 2023.

    With the new tools, these and other countries can eliminate malaria, getting us closer to the dream of a malaria-free world.

    Shüné Oliver receives funding from the National Research Foundation of South Africa and the South African Medical Research Council. She is associated with both the National Institute for Communicable Diseases and the Wits Research Institte for Malaria.

    Jaishree Raman receives funding from the Gates Foundation, Global Fund, Wellcome Trust, National Research Foundation, National Institute for Communicable Diseases, South African Medical Research Council, and the Research Trust. She is affiliated with the National Institute for Communicable Diseases, the Wits Institute for Malaria Research, University of Witwatersrand, and the Institute for Sustainable Malaria Control, University of Pretoria.

    ref. Malaria scorecard: battles have been won and advances made, but the war isn’t over – https://theconversation.com/malaria-scorecard-battles-have-been-won-and-advances-made-but-the-war-isnt-over-255230

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Light public housing tenders open

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    The Housing Bureau today invited tenders for two Light Public Housing (LPH) operation and management contracts. The deadline is noon on June 13.

    The first contract covers four school conversion projects. These are at the Mission Covenant Church Holm Glad No. 2 Primary School on Shun On Road in Shun On Estate, Kwun Tong; the Tung Wah Group of Hospitals Ma Kam Chan Memorial Primary School (Choi Yuen Annex) on Choi Yuen Road in Choi Yuen Estate, Sheung Shui; the Carmel Leung Sing Tak School on Shun Lee Tsuen Road in Shun On Estate, Kwun Tong; and the Baptist Rainbow Primary School on Chuk Yuen Road in Chuk Yuen South Estate, Wong Tai Sin.

    The conversion works will be completed in two phases. The first covers the two projects on Shun On Road and Choi Yuen Road, which will provide about 130 and 110 units respectively. These are expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of this year.

    The second phase covers the two projects on Shun Lee Tsuen Road and Chuk Yuen Road, which will provide about 110 and 105 units respectively. These are expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2027.

    The second contract covers the project at Sheung On Street, Chai Wan, which will provide about 1,720 units and is expected to be completed in the second quarter of next year.

    The bureau said the four school conversion projects have been packaged into one single contract in light of their relatively smaller scale. By engaging a single operator for the contract’s overall operation and management, resources can be shared among the projects to enhance cost-effectiveness, it explained.

    The contracts cover not only occupancy management, property management and daily maintenance services, but also the provision of social services, as well as the management and operation of ancillary facilities.

    Tenders are invited from all capable and experienced service providers, including non-government organisations and those with a valid property management company licence, or collaborations between such providers.

    To ensure service quality, the bureau will carry out technical assessments based on factors including providers’ management capabilities, relevant experience and past service performance, as well as their proposed modes of operation and management, the social services to be provided, the feasibility of their exit plans, and their use of innovation and information technology.

    Each tender price will then be evaluated to form a consolidated assessment to decide on the most suitable organisation for the LPH contracts.

    Interested organisations may download the tender documents via the bureau’s website or from the e-Tendering System. They can also contact the bureau’s Dedicated Team on Light Public Housing to obtain the relevant documents.

    The tender reference for the Shun On Road, Choi Yuen Road, Shun Lee Tsuen Road and Chuk Yuen Road LPH projects is HB2025/OPR-LPH-VSP, while the tender reference for the Sheung On Street, Chai Wan LPH project is HB2025/OPR-LPH-CW.

    Tenders must be submitted before the deadline, either electronically via the e-Tendering System or by deposit in the Government Secretariat Tender Box situated at the public entrance lobby on Ground Floor, East Wing, Central Government Offices, 2 Tim Mei Avenue, Tamar.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Frozen anchovies recalled due to the presence of a marine biotoxin

    Source: Ministry for Primary Industries

    New Zealand Food Safety is supporting Pendarves Ltd in its recall of a specific range of imported frozen anchovies due to the presence of a marine biotoxin.

    “Testing of the product has found the presence of domonic acid, a neurotoxin produced by certain algae that can cause amnesic shellfish poisoning in humans,” says New Zealand Food Safety’s acting deputy director-general Claire McDonald.

    “These products should not be eaten. You can return them to the place of purchase for a refund. If that’s not possible, throw it out.”

    The affected products were sold at a small number of supermarkets and specialty stores.

    Visit New Zealand Food Safety’s recall page for up-to-date information and photographs of the affected product.

    New Zealand Food Safety has not received any notifications of associated illness.

    Symptoms are mainly gastrointestinal, especially at low toxin levels. These usually appear within 24 hours of eating and may include vomiting, nausea, diarrhoea, and abdominal cramps.

    In more serious cases there can be neurological symptoms. These can take up to 3 days to develop and can range from headaches and dizziness to memory loss and, for severe cases, coma.

    If you have consumed any of this product and are concerned for your health, contact your health professional, or call Healthline on 0800 611 116 for free advice.

    The products have been removed from store shelves and have not been exported.

    The vast majority of food sold in New Zealand is safe, but sometimes problems can occur. Help keep yourself and your family safe by subscribing to our recall alerts.

    Information on how to subscribe is on the New Zealand Food Safety food recall page.

    More information about illness caused by algae, including amnesic shellfish poisoning, can be found on our website.

    What is toxic shellfish poisoning?

    For general enquiries, call MPI on 0800 00 83 33 or email info@mpi.govt.nz

    For media enquiries, contact the media team on 029 894 0328.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Find parenting support at ACT Child and Family Centres

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    You’ll find caring, welcoming staff members at ACT Child and Family Centres.

    In brief:

    • The ACT’s Child and Family Centres provide parenting support and advice.
    • Services are available for anyone pregnant and for families with children up to 8 years old.
    • Centres are located at Tuggeranong, West Belconnen and Gungahlin.

    Parenting isn’t always easy. Sometimes we all need a bit of help.

    The ACT Government’s Child and Family Centres can be that helping hand when you need it.

    The centres offer assistance and advice to support your child’s:

    • health
    • wellbeing
    • learning
    • development.

    “Primarily, our major focus is around parenting. But this exists around all the other things that are going on in a person’s life,” Gungahlin Child and Family Centre Team Leader Shiobhan Tunks said.

    “How someone parents children might be impacted by so many factors. The most important thing to know is the range of things we can help with is really varied, is matched to the family’s needs and it is 100% free.”

    Three centres across Canberra

    Centres are located at Tuggeranong, West Belconnen and Gungahlin.

    Each offers families and carers free help with:

    • parenting support and advice
    • child development assessments through the Child Development Service
    • referrals to other health, wellbeing and support services
    • advice from a qualified social worker
    • playgroups and parenting groups.

    A caring and welcoming staff member will chat to you about available support.

    You can help yourself to tea and coffee and there is a parents’ room and children’s play space in each centre.

    Your questions answered

    Whatever you need to ask about your child’s health, wellbeing and development, staff are here to listen and help.

    “Parenting doesn’t always come naturally. There are always things to learn about how we can parent our children. What we find, is that all parents want what’s best for their children. We can give parents new tools that they weren’t aware of, that can actually make things feel a lot easier for them and their children,” Shiobhan said.

    Most services are for families with children up to 8 years and some services are available for children up to 12 years.

    Services are also available when you’re pregnant and continue after the birth of your little one.

    Skilled, compassionate staff

    Shiobhan says working in a Child and Family Centre is very rewarding.

    “It feels like a very important job. It’s diverse; each family is different. And there’s a level of creativity and flexibility in the work because we want to be able to work with where parents and families are at, in the moment.

    “Staff continue to receive ongoing training and supervision, and what we are offering is current best practice. The programs we use are evidence based, they are effective. And we work with our colleagues in the Child Development Service and Maternal and Child Health so there is a lot of cross pollination of ideas and skills,” she said.

    To find out more about Canberra’s Child and Family Centres visit act.gov.au/community/families/child-and-family-centres

    Read more like this:


    Get ACT news and events delivered straight to your inbox, sign up to our email newsletter:


    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Cortez Masto Blasts Trump’s Attacks on Head Start, Demands RFK Jr. Immediately Release Funding and Reverse Firings

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nevada Cortez Masto

    Reno, Nev. – Today, U.S. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) joined Senators Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) in sending a letter to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. demanding the Department of Health and Human Services immediately release Head Start funding and reverse the mass firing of Head Start staff. Cortez Masto has been a strong supporter of the Head Start program, which provides early childhood learning for thousands of children across Nevada.

    “Since day one, this Administration has taken unacceptable actions to withhold and delay funding, fire Head Start staff, and gut high-quality services for children. Already this year, this Administration has withheld almost $1 billion in federal grant funding from Head Start programs, a 37 percent decrease compared to the amount of funding awarded during the same period last year,” the lawmakers began. “It is abundantly clear that these actions are part of a broader effort to ultimately eliminate the program altogether, as the Administration reportedly plans to do in its fiscal year 2026 budget proposal.”

    “Head Start provides early childhood education and comprehensive health and social services to nearly 800,000 young children every year in communities across this country, and employs about 250,000 dedicated staff. Head Start is a critical source of child care for working families, particularly in rural and Tribal communities, where Head Start programs are often the only option for high-quality child care services,” they wrote. “Head Start programs ensure children receive appropriate health and dental care, nutrition support, and referrals to other critical services for parents, such as job training, adult education, nutrition services, and housing support.”

    “The Administration has a legal and moral obligation to disburse Head Start funds to programs and to uphold the program’s promise to provide high-quality early education services to low income children and families across this country. There is no justifiable reason for the delay in funding we have seen over the last two months, and you have refused to offer any kind of explanation,” they continued. “[W]e urge you to immediately reinstate fired staff across all Offices of Head Start, and cease all actions to delay the awarding and disbursement of funding to Head Start programs across this country.”

    You can find the full text of the letter here.

    Senator Cortez Masto has pushed multiple Departments under the Trump Administration for detailed, public information regarding the impacts of President Trump’s federal funding freeze, hiring freeze, and terminations on Nevada – including to the Department of the Interior, the U.S. Forest Service, the National Nuclear Security Administration, the Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Agriculture, General Services Administration, and Department of Health and Human Services.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Biosensory Dome (Spatial Design)—Digitally Expressing the Healing Powers of Nature

    Source: Panasonic

    Headline: Biosensory Dome (Spatial Design)—Digitally Expressing the Healing Powers of Nature

    Mikako Miura
    Solution Development Division,Electric Works Company,Panasonic Corporation

    Yoshiteru Hara
    Expo 2025 Osaka, Kansai,Japan Promotion Committee,Panasonic Holdings Corporation

    Nariaki Iwatani
    anno lab Inc.

    Ippo Hayashida
    anno lab Inc.

    Masahiro Ihara
    anno lab Inc.

    Co-creation as the First Step of a Slightly Lofty Challenge
    Hara: This is the second time Panasonic collaborated with anno lab. The first was an exhibit with biophilia* as the overarching theme.
    *Biophilia: A concept emphasizing connectivity with nature and being in harmony with it.
    Miura: Biophilia and the concept of the Earth area, a “720° cycle,” are tightly linked. That’s why we wanted to ask for anno lab’s support again in designing the Biosensory Dome.
    Ihara: We usually create digital content for exhibitions in science and other museums. Although we are quite familiar with exhibits leveraging digital technology, the abstract theme of digitally recreating nature posed a rather formidable challenge.
    Hara: The breadth and depth of the theme were precisely what made designing this exhibit so difficult. The other exhibits in the Earth area had a clear starting point: “How can we express the 720° cycle with this technology?” On the other hand, there were no requirements regarding technologies to be used for the Biosensory Dome.

    Miura: Instead of installing real natural elements like houseplants, we were tasked to digitally reproduce nature with whatever means available. Because we had absolutely no limitations, it took us a long time to find a solution.
    Hayashida: Once we found the direction to take, we received increasingly challenging requests, which communicated to me that these people are 120% serious about the exhibit. That invigorated us and made us want to reciprocate.
    Iwatani: For people like us who are used to creating digital content, we can see the feasibility of a project, whether for good or for bad, at the ideation stage. If anno lab had taken on this challenge alone, we would not have been able to deliver as bold an exhibit as this one. But Panasonic pushed us outside of our comfort zone, and we watched the exhibit evolve. I could see the true value of co-creation by how the number of possibilities ballooned.
    Hara: This project was initially a little above everyone’s pay grade. But I think our handiwork exceeded our expectations because we dared to challenge ourselves beyond our skill levels.

    Digitally Reproducing Fog, Sunlight Filtered Through Trees, Breath, and Warmth
    Ihara: After countless discussions and some failures, we finally settled on the themes of “fog and airflow” and “light and breath,” under which we are now creating exhibits.
    Hayashida: I was put in charge of creating the device producing the mist. We use a machine resembling a water basin to generate mist, which we then illuminate. The result is that you can enjoy drifting mist similar to a morning fog or a sea of clouds.
    Miura: Visitors can interact with the exhibit in many ways. The experience is not only visual but also tactile: they can stick their hand into the mist and stir it or blow on it. What were the challenges in creating and adjusting the device?
    Hayashida: Because mist is fluffy and elusive, it was tough to make it move the way we wanted it to. Particularly difficult was striking the optimal balance between retention and diffusion. If the wind were too weak, the mist would not move, and then…nothing. On the other hand, if it were too strong, the mist would look too “busy.” It took me a very long time to configure the device so that the mist would stay inside it but continue to drift around.

    A device that controls the amount of mist and airflow to create an illusory drifting of fog

    The Breathing Sphere expresses lifelike softness and warmth

    Hara: Originally, we were only planning to control the amount of mist, but ultimately, we needed to control the airflow as well. Thanks to anno lab’s innovative solution to this difficult request, I believe we succeeded in creating an exhibit that is both natural and entertaining for visitors. The Breathing Sphere in the other dome was designed by Mr. Ihara.
    Ihara: I considered the soothing effects of nature from various angles and decided on the theme of “the breathing of a child sleeping in the shade of a tree with sun rays shining through it.” The Breathing Sphere was born out of trial and error in an effort to somehow express the up-and-down motion of a child’s chest while napping in the warm sunlight.
    Miura: The Breathing Sphere is a large ball with a soft texture. It is also slightly warm to the touch and expands and shrinks. It’s kind of magical, like touching a living thing or lying in the shade on a sunny day.
    Ihara: In actually building the exhibit, I realized how difficult it was to create something unprecedented or with no correct answer. Our goal was to make the Breathing Sphere feel natural and comfortable to the people who saw it, and thus this goal was essentially unquantifiable. We did everything possible to design the exhibit in such a way with digital technology.
    Hara: We basically experimented with many ideas, and the team members would make a decision on the best one based on their intuition. We would then find a path that might work, proceed that way, and then repeat the process.
    Iwatani: My mission was to quantify the comfortable state that Mr. Ihara, Mr. Hayashida, and the other team members discovered with their senses so that we could reproduce this state digitally. I was put in charge of setting comfort parameters and controlling the equipment and programs.
    Ihara: Mr. Iwatani was also responsible for controlling the lighting in the dome.
    Iwatani: We are using Panasonic’s new lighting technology leveraging micro LEDs. Light usually travels in only one direction; however, the novelty of this technology is its ability to control light so that you can illuminate multiple directions with a single light source or create dynamic lighting effects. Since it is not yet on the market, we held numerous discussions with the developers to find the most effective way to use it.
    Miura: We explored the comfort of nature through a very hands-on approach—depending on people’s senses. Once we had a clue, we digitally reproduced the state and then observed it again with our senses. We switched back and forth between analog and digital approaches every day as we sought the best way to fashion the exhibit.
    Ihara: We simply “arrived” at the current design through trial and error, rather than moving forward with a clear goal in mind.

    How Do You Play with This and What Do You Feel? Leaving the Answers to Children
    Hara: Because we focused on how it would resonate with people’s intuition or feelings, the exhibit was not designed with an agenda like “This is how we want you to feel” or “That is how you should experience it.”
    Miura: Of course, we offer sensory stimuli that most people would find comfortable and pleasant, but some kids may dislike the sensations, and that’s okay. What’s more important is that children be connected to how they feel, whether it’s pleasant or uncomfortable.
    Hara: When I visited the Biosensory Dome, I got a pleasant feeling from seeing Ms. Miura grinning as she touched the Breathing Sphere. I newly discovered that we can enjoy multisensory stimulation through not only touching the Breathing Sphere and mist but also watching people having fun with them.
    Miura: I want children to freely explore without worrying about rules or guidelines when interacting with the Biosensory Dome. If I can convey through this exhibit the notion that there are a thousand different ways to have fun, and experiences vary from person to person, then I will have achieved my goal.
    Ihara: To me, the Biosensory Dome is like a sandbox. You can build a castle, dig a river, or just listen to the whisper-like sound of sand falling. It would be great if everyone could freely explore like that. But if it’s too free, some kids start wondering, “Where can I start?” That is why we wanted to provide some gimmicks to stimulate their curiosity. They can at least start from stirring the mist or touching the Breathing Sphere.
    Iwatani: It’s only adults who try to manipulate certain feelings in children, whether it be through exhibits, interactive experiences, or play. Children don’t look back on every fun and new experience, or try to put into words their accomplishments or events that lead to their growth, right? We want children to play like children. Having said that, it would be nice if kids could sense that somebody behind the scenes created these natural experiences. For example, you get comforted by the sight of sunshine penetrating tree leaves or sitting around a fire. But behind those natural experiences, there was someone who planted the tree or lit the fire. It is my hope that children can sense that, even if only vaguely.

    Hayashida: I would be happy if the Biosensory Dome struck a chord not only with small children but also with teenagers. Naturally, I want them to experience the beauty and comfort in what we created, but it is also my hope that they would take it a step further and see the ingenuity in reproducing nature with digital technology, or ask questions like “How did they do it?” “Who are the people that made this?” It would be wonderful if both their senses and their intellect were stimulated, and that some would be inspired to choose engineering or manufacturing as their career.
    Hara: I really look forward to seeing how children let their imagination run free in this unrestricted space.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-Evening Report: ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for April 25, 2025

    ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on April 25, 2025.

    Labor takes large leads in YouGov and Morgan polls as surge continues
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne With just eight days until the May 3 federal election, and with in-person early voting well under way, Labor has taken a seven-point lead in a national

    Beating malaria: what can be done with shrinking funds and rising threats
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Taneshka Kruger, UP ISMC: Project Manager and Coordinator, University of Pretoria Healthcare in Africa faces a perfect storm: high rates of infectious diseases like malaria and HIV, a rise in non-communicable diseases, and dwindling foreign aid. In 2021, nearly half of the sub-Saharan African countries relied on

    Open letter to Fijians – ‘why is our country supporting Israel’s heinous crimes in Gaza?’
    Pacific Media Watch The Fijians for Palestine Solidarity Network today condemned the Fiji government’s failure to stand up for international law and justice over the Israeli war on Gaza in their weekly Black Thursday protest. “For the past 18 months, we have made repeated requests to our government to do the bare minimum and enforce

    Scares and stunts in the home stretch: election special podcast
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Michelle Grattan and Amanda Dunn discuss the fourth week of the 2025 election campaign. While the death of Pope Francis interrupted campaigning for a while, the leaders had another debate on Tuesday night and the opposition (belatedly) put out its

    Grattan on Friday: Coalition’s campaign lacks good planning and enough elbow grease
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Whatever the result on May 3, even people within the Liberals think they have run a very poor national campaign. Not just poor, but odd. Nothing makes the point more strongly than this week’s release of the opposition’s defence policy.

    Inside the elaborate farewell to Pope Francis
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Carole Cusack, Professor of Religious Studies, University of Sydney ➡️ View the full interactive version of this article here. Carole Cusack does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no

    5 ways to tackle Australia’s backlog of asylum cases
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Daniel Ghezelbash, Professor and Director, Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, UNSW Law & Justice, UNSW Sydney People who apply for asylum in Australia face significant delays in having their claims processed. These delays undermine the integrity of the asylum system, erode public confidence and cause significant

    Preference deals can decide the outcome of a seat in an election – but not always
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne Every election cycle the media becomes infatuated, even if temporarily, with preference deals between parties. The 2025 election is no exception, with many media reports about preference

    What is preferential voting and how does it work? Your guide to making your vote count
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robert Hortle, Deputy Director, Tasmanian Policy Exchange, University of Tasmania For each Australian federal election, there are two different ways you get to vote. Whether you vote early, by post or on polling day on May 3, each eligible voter will be given two ballot papers: one

    Back to the fuel guzzlers? Coalition plans to end EV tax breaks would hobble the clean transport transition
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anna Mortimore, Lecturer, Griffith Business School, Griffith University wedmoment.stock/Shutterstock If elected, the Coalition has pledged to end Labor’s substantial tax break for new zero- or low-emissions vehicles. This, combined with an earlier promise to roll back new fuel efficiency standards, would successfully slow the transition to hybrid

    Many experienced tradies don’t have formal qualifications. Could fast-tracked recognition ease the housing crisis?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Pi-Shen Seet, Professor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Edith Cowan University Once again, housing affordability is at the forefront of an Australian federal election. Both major parties have put housing policies at the centre of their respective campaigns. But there are still concerns too little is being done

    This may be as good as it gets: NZ and Australia face a complicated puzzle when it comes to supermarket prices
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Richard Meade, Adjunct Associate Professor, Centre for Applied Energy Economics and Policy Research, Griffith University Daria Nipot/Shutterstock With ongoing cost of living pressures, the Australian and New Zealand supermarket sectors are attracting renewed political attention on both sides of the Tasman. Allegations of price gouging have become

    The phrase ‘fuzzy wuzzy angels’ is far from affectionate – it reflects 500 years of racism
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Erika K. Smith, Associate Lecturer, School of Social Sciences, Western Sydney University This article contains mention of racist terms in historical context. Every Anzac Day, Australians are presented with narratives that re-inscribe particular versions of our national story. One such narrative persistently claims “fuzzy wuzzy angel” was

    Why AUKUS remains the right strategy for the future defence of Australia
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jennifer Parker, Adjunct Fellow, Naval Studies at UNSW Canberra, and Expert Associate, National Security College, Australian National University Australian strategic thinking has long struggled to move beyond a narrow view of defence that focuses solely on protecting our shores. However, in today’s world, our economy could be

    Election meme hits and duds – we’ve graded some of the best (and worst) of the campaign so far
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By T.J. Thomson, Senior Lecturer in Visual Communication & Digital Media, RMIT University As Australia begins voting in the federal election, we’re awash with political messages. While this of course includes the typical paid ads in newspapers and on TV (those ones with the infamously fast-paced “authorised by”

    Markets are choppy. What should you do with your super if you are near retirement?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Natalie Peng, Lecturer in Accounting, The University of Queensland Shutterstock For Australians approaching retirement, recent market volatility may feel like more than just a bump in the road. Unlike younger investors, who have time on their side, retirees don’t have the luxury of waiting out downturns. A

    Provocative, progressive and fearless: why Beatrice Faust’s views still resonate in Australia
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Judith Brett, Emeritus Professor of Politics, La Trobe University Beatrice Faust is best remembered as the founder, early in 1972, of the Women’s Electoral Lobby (WEL). Women’s Liberation was already well under way. Betty Friedan had published The Feminine Mystique in 1962, arguing that many women found

    ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for April 24, 2025
    ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on April 24, 2025.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Polis Signs Bills to Protect Coloradans’ Privacy and Healthcare Freedom Into Law, Signs Additional Laws, and Takes Action on Bill

    Source: US State of Colorado

    DENVER – Today, Governor Polis signed into law protections to ensure Coloradans’ healthcare freedoms and safeguard privacy. During a ceremony in the Governor’s Office, Governor Polis signed the following bills into law:

    • SB25-129 – Legally Protected Health-Care Activity Protections, sponsored by Senators Lisa Cutter and Faith Winter, and Representatives Junie Joseph and Karen McCormick
    • SB25-183 – Coverage for Pregnancy-Related Services, sponsored by Senators Robert Rodriguez and Lindsey Daugherty, and Representatives Lorena Garcia and Julie McCluskie

    “In the Free State of Colorado, we are protecting Coloradans’ healthcare freedoms, while leaders in DC and across the country are focused on bringing government between doctors and patients, overreaching into our families and lives. This past November, Coloradans from every walk of life overwhelmingly voted to enshrine reproductive freedom into our state constitution. Today, we are aligning our laws with the will of voters to strengthen access to reproductive care, protect our privacy from Washington, DC, and safeguard freedoms,” said Governor Polis.

    “We trust patients. We trust families. And we trust providers. While other states are turning back the clock, we’re moving forward — protecting privacy, expanding access, and standing up for fundamental freedoms,” said Lt. Governor and Director of the Office of Saving People Money on Health Care, Dianne Primavera. “These laws don’t just reflect our values — they protect real people in real ways. As a woman who’s faced serious illness and spent my career fighting for high-quality and affordable health care for all Coloradans, I’m proud that Colorado continues to lead with compassion, conviction, and courage.”

    Governor Polis also signed the following bipartisan bills into law administratively:

    • SB25-216 – Eliminate Reprinting of Education Laws, sponsored by Senators Jeff Bridges and Barbara Kirkmeyer, and Representatives Emily Sirota and Rick Taggart
    • SB25-217 – Repeal Computer Science Education Grant Program, sponsored by Senators Judy Amabile and Jeff Bridges, and Representatives Shannon Bird and Emily Sirota
    • SB25-222 – Repeal Proficiency Tests Administered by Schools, sponsored by Senators Jeff Bridges and Judy Amabile, and Representatives Emily Sirota and Rick Taggart
    • SB25-231 – Repeal Inclusive Higher Education Act, sponsored by Senators Judy Amabile and Barbara Kirkmeyer, and Representatives Shannon Bird and Emily Sirota
    • SB25-232 – Repeal Recovery-Friendly Workplace Program, sponsored by Senators Jeff Bridges and Barbara Kirkmeyer, and Representatives Shannon Bird and Rick Taggart
    • SB25-246 – Eliminate Gray & Black Market Marijuana Grant Program, sponsored by Senators Jeff Bridges and Barbara Kirkmeyer, and Representatives Shannon Bird and Emily Sirota
    • SB25-250 – Repeal Disordered Eating Prevention Program, sponsored by Senators Judy Amabile and Barbara Kirkmeyer, and Representatives Shannon Bird and Rick Taggart
    • SB25-252 – Repeal Radiation Advisory Committee, sponsored by Senators Jeff Bridges and Barbara Kirkmeyer, and Representatives Shannon Bird and Rick Taggart
    • SB25-255 – Transfer to Hazardous Substance Response Fund, sponsored by Senators Judy Amabile and Jeff Bridges, and Representatives Shannon Bird and Rick Taggart
    • SB25-256 – Funds for Support of Digital Trunked Radio System, sponsored by Senators Barbara Kirkmeyer and Judy Amabile, and Representatives Shannon Bird and Emily Sirota
    • SB25-266 – Repeal Statutory Appropriation Requirements, sponsored by Senators Jeff Bridges and Barbara Kirkmeyer, and Representatives Emily Sirota and Rick Taggart

    Governor Polis also vetoed the following bill:

    • SB25-086 – Protections for Users of Social Media, sponsored by Senators Lisa Frizell and Lindsey Daugherty, and Representatives Andrew Boesenecker and Anthony Hartsook

    “This law imposes sweeping requirements that social media platforms, rather than law enforcement, enforce state law. It mandates a private company to investigate and impose the government’s chosen penalty of permanently deplatforming a user even if the underlying complaint is malicious and unwarranted. In our judicial proceedings, people receive due process when they are suspected of breaking the law. This bill, however, conscripts social media platforms to be judge and jury when users may have broken the law or even a company’s own content rules. This proposed law would incentivize platforms, in order to reduce liability risk, to simply deplatform a user in order to comply with this proposed law,” Governor Polis wrote in his veto letter.

    ###

     

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Grassley, Reynolds, Nunn Applaud Grand Opening of YSS Ember Recovery Campus

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Iowa Chuck Grassley
    STORY COUNTY, IOWA – U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Gov. Kim Reynolds and U.S. Rep. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa) today attended a ribbon cutting at Youth and Shelter Services’ (YSS) newly-opened youth recovery center. The Ember Recovery Campus, located near Cambridge, will provide Iowa youth individualized, evidence-based mental health and addiction treatment.
    “I want to congratulate everybody who helped turn this dream into a reality,” Grassley said. “The Ember Recovery Campus is a refuge of hope and healing that will give struggling Iowans a fresh start and provide many families much-needed peace of mind. Empowering young people to change their life gives them skin in the game and helps them overcome barriers to reach their full potential.”
    “It took a lot of hard work and a lot of patience, but finally, the beautiful vision of the YSS Ember Recovery Campus has been realized. It’s a vision that I couldn’t be prouder or more honored to celebrate,” Reynolds said. “The buildings and beautiful nature – all 50 acres of them – will serve as a safe and welcoming refuge for youth in crisis who require immediate help and where they can find stability, long-term treatment, and – eventually – the hope of a new and better tomorrow.”
    “What the YSS team built is nothing short of extraordinary. I have been proud to help the YSS mission, bringing $1.6 million to help serve youth in need in Iowa, as well as joining for the ribbon cutting to launch the Ember Recovery Campus. These efforts are a second chance for kids who have been through more than most of us can imagine,” said Rep. Nunn. “The campus and the resources it will provide young people will give a fresh perspective and an important re-start to so many Iowa families. I’m committed to fighting alongside them to ensure mission success.”

    Background:
    YSS is an Ames-based organization dedicated to providing treatment and rehabilitation resources for youth in crisis. Its Ember Recovery Campus seeks to help youth who are struggling with addiction, providing therapy, wellness and recreation resources. The campus’ 50 acres provide space for youth to focus on recovery in a safe and secure environment and empower young Iowans for success after leaving the facility.
    Grassley has long pushed for reforms and supported resources to help get delinquent youth back on track. Three decades ago, Grassley spearheaded a grassroots-based coalition called Face It Together that brought community stakeholders, business leaders and youth advocates together to address youth drug use. Face It Together evolved into community-led efforts, including Partnership for a Drug-Free Iowa and Partnership for a Healthy Iowa. Today’s ribbon-cutting at YSS Ember Recovery Campus reflects the hard work put in at the grassroots that Grassley helped foster decades ago.
    -30- 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Beating malaria: what can be done with shrinking funds and rising threats

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Taneshka Kruger, UP ISMC: Project Manager and Coordinator, University of Pretoria

    Healthcare in Africa faces a perfect storm: high rates of infectious diseases like malaria and HIV, a rise in non-communicable diseases, and dwindling foreign aid.

    In 2021, nearly half of the sub-Saharan African countries relied on external financing for more than a third of their health expenditure. But donor fatigue and competing global priorities, such as climate change and geopolitical instability, have placed malaria control programmes under immense pressure. These funding gaps now threaten hard-won progress and ultimately malaria eradication.

    The continent’s healthcare funding crisis isn’t new. But its consequences are becoming more severe. As financial contributions shrink, Africa’s ability to respond to deadly diseases like malaria is being tested like never before.

    Malaria remains one of the world’s most pressing public health threats. According to the World Health Organization there were an estimated 263 million malaria cases and 597,000 deaths globally in 2023 – an increase of 11 million cases from the previous year.

    The WHO African region bore the brunt, with 94% of cases and 95% of deaths. It is now estimated that a child under the age of five dies roughly every 90 seconds due to malaria.

    Yet, malaria control efforts since 2000 have averted over 2 billion cases and saved nearly 13 million lives globally. Breakthroughs in diagnostics, treatment and prevention have been critical to this progress. They include insecticide-treated nets, rapid diagnostic tests, artemisinin-based combination therapies (drug combinations to prevent resistance) and malaria vaccines.

    Since 2017, the progress has been flat. If the funding gap widens, the risk is not just stagnation; it’s backsliding. Several emerging threats such as climate change and funding shortfalls could undo the gains of the early 2000s to mid-2010s.

    New challenges

    Resistance to drugs and insecticides, and strains of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum that standard
    diagnostics can’t detect, have emerged as challenges. There have also been changes in mosquito behaviour, with vectors increasingly biting outdoors, making bed nets less effective.

    Climate change is shifting malaria transmission patterns. And the invasive Asian mosquito species Anopheles stephensi is spreading across Africa, particularly in urban areas.

    Add to this the persistent issue of cross-border transmission, and growing funding shortfalls and aid cuts, and it’s clear that the fight against malaria is at a critical point.

    As the world observes World Malaria Day 2025 under the theme “Malaria ends with us: reinvest, reimagine, reignite”, the call to action is urgent. Africa must lead the charge against malaria through renewed investment, bold innovation, and revitalised political will.

    Reinvest: Prevention is the most cost-effective intervention

    We – researchers, policymakers, health workers and communities – need to think smarter about funding. The economic logic of prevention is simple. It’s far cheaper to prevent malaria than to treat it. The total cost of procuring and delivering long-lasting insecticidal nets typically ranges between US$4 and US$7 each and the nets protect families for years. In contrast, treating a single case of severe malaria may cost hundreds of dollars and involve hospitalisation.

    In high-burden countries, malaria can consume up to 40% of public health spending.

    In Tanzania, for instance, malaria contributes to 30% of the country’s total disease burden. The broader economic toll – lost productivity, work and school absenteeism, and healthcare costs – is staggering. Prevention through long-lasting insecticidal nets, chemoprevention and health education isn’t only humane; it’s fiscally responsible.

    Reimagine: New tools, local solutions

    We cannot fight tomorrow’s malaria with yesterday’s tools. Resistance, climate-driven shifts in transmission, and urbanisation are changing malaria’s patterns.

    This is why re-imagining our approach is urgent.

    African countries must scale up innovations like the RTS,S/AS01 vaccine and next-generation mosquito nets. But more importantly, they must build their own capacity to develop, test and produce these tools.

    This requires investing in research and development, regional regulatory harmonisation, and local manufacturing.

    There is also a need to build leadership capacity within malaria control programmes to manage this adaptive disease with agility and evidence-based decision-making.

    Reignite: Community and collaboration matters

    Reigniting the malaria fight means shifting power to those on the frontlines. Community health workers remain one of Africa’s greatest untapped resources. Already delivering malaria testing, treatment and health education in remote areas, they can also be trained to manage other health challenges.

    Integrating malaria prevention into broader community health services makes sense. It builds resilience, reduces duplication, and ensures continuity even when external funding fluctuates.

    Every malaria intervention delivered by a trusted, local health worker is a step towards community ownership of health.

    Strengthened collaboration between partners, governments, cross-border nations, and local communities is also needed.

    The cost of inaction is unaffordable

    Africa’s malaria challenge is part of a deeper health systems crisis. By 2030, the continent will require an additional US$371 billion annually to deliver basic primary healthcare – about US$58 per person.

    For malaria in 2023 alone, US$8.3 billion was required to meet global control and elimination targets, yet only US$4 billion was mobilised. This gap has grown consistently, increasing from US$2.6 billion in 2019 to US$4.3 billion in 2023.

    The shortfall has led to major gaps in the coverage of essential malaria interventions.

    The solution does not lie in simply spending more, but in spending smarter by focusing on prevention, building local innovation, and strengthening primary healthcare systems.

    The responsibility is collective. African governments must invest boldly and reform policies to prioritise prevention.

    Global partners must support without dominating. And communities must be empowered to take ownership of their health.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Beating malaria: what can be done with shrinking funds and rising threats – https://theconversation.com/beating-malaria-what-can-be-done-with-shrinking-funds-and-rising-threats-255126

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI USA: Strickland Reintroduces Bill to Help Servicemembers Access Fertility Care

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland (WA-10)

    Washington, DC – Today, during National Infertility Awareness Week, Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland (WA-10), led the reintroduction of the Expanding Access to Fertility Care for Servicemembers and Dependents Act, which would expand TRICARE coverage to make assisted reproductive services, including IVF, available to all active-duty servicemembers (including the Reserve and National Guard) and dependents – regardless of service-connection requirements, sex, gender, sexual orientation, or marital status of the servicemember or their dependent.

    This bill has been endorsed by RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, the Center for Reproductive Rights, and the Modern Military Association of America.

    “Answering the call to serve often means making a great number of sacrifices for your country. Being able to start a family should not be one of them. This bill removes current barriers in TRICARE and helps ensure that all servicemembers can access the fertility care they deserve to start a family,” said Strickland.

    “Our nation’s servicemembers and their families make incredible sacrifices every day, and they deserve access to the full spectrum of medical care to build their families. The majority of Americans — 85% — support access to IVF, one of the most effective medical treatments for those struggling to build their family. Expanding TRICARE coverage to include IVF and fertility care is not just the right thing to do—it’s a critical investment in the health and well-being of military families. RESOLVE stands strongly in support of this long-overdue change, and we urge Congress to act swiftly to ensure that no one who serves our country is denied the chance to become a parent,” said Barbara Collura, President/CEO of RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association

    “For decades, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) has been a leader in promoting policies that expand access to fertility treatments like IVF for military families, who face unique family building challenges due to the nature of their work in service to our country,” said Sean Tipton, ASRM Chief Advocacy & Policy Officer. “We thank Congresswoman Strickland, Delegate Norton, Congressman Takano, and Congresswoman Pressley for calling attention to the fact that current Department of Defense (DoD) policy – which limits TRICARE coverage for fertility treatments to only service members with a service-connected illness or injury – fails to provide our military families with adequate access to care. It’s about time we address this shortcoming so that our brave men and women in uniform do not have to juggle the out-of-pocket costs for treatment with their service, end their military careers to access health care, or forego their dreams of having a family.”

    “The Expanding Access to Fertility Care for Servicemembers and Dependents Act is a critical piece of legislation. By removing legal barriers that currently exclude from insurance coverage servicemembers whose infertility is not directly service-related, and safeguarding against discrimination in coverage of this care, the Act gets us closer to ensuring that all servicemembers and their dependents can have equitable and non-discriminatory access to the fertility health care they need to build their families,” said Karla Torres, Senior Human Rights Counsel, Center for Reproductive Rights

    The legislation is cosponsored by Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC), Rep. Mark Takano (CA-39), and Rep. Ayanna Pressley (MA-7).

    Read the full bill text here.

    Congresswoman Marilyn Strickland (WA-10) serves on the House Armed Services Committee and the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. She is Whip of the New Democrat Coalition, Secretary of the Congressional Black Caucus, and is one of the first Korean-American women elected to Congress.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Sir Michael Marmot visits Liverpool to officially award Marmot City status  

    Source: City of Liverpool

    Liverpool City Council has officially been awarded Marmot City status, a national recognition of the city’s commitment to reducing health inequalities and improving wellbeing for every resident.

    The status was formally awarded by Professor Sir Michael Marmot, a leading figure in health equity, during a visit to the city on 23 April.

    Sir Michael visited Liverpool to highlight the city’s efforts to address the root causes of poor health including poverty, poor housing, low-paid and unstable employment, and unequal access to education.

    These wider issues have a significant impact on how long people live and how healthy they are throughout their lives.

    The city’s Marmot City ambitions are also informed by the findings of The State of Health in the City: Liverpool 2040 a landmark report that highlighted Liverpool’s deep-rooted health inequalities and showcased the innovative work already underway to address them.

    Currently, people in Liverpool are living shorter lives and spending more time in poor health compared to the national average.

    In some areas, life expectancy is up to 15 years lower, and residents may experience up to 18 more years of ill health than those in more affluent neighbourhoods.

    To respond to these challenges, Liverpool has developed a coordinated approach through the Fairer, Healthier Liverpool (FHL) Partnership a collaboration between the City Council, NHS, voluntary and community organisations, and other key partners.

    Together working to:

    • Take action across the Marmot Eight Principles
    • Strengthen local partnerships
    • Involve communities in shaping solutions
    • Take early action to prevent poor health
    • Embed fairness and health into all policies and services

    Examples of the work already underway include the development of Liverpool’s ‘Health in All Policies’ approach, which ensures health is embedded into decisions around planning, housing, and regeneration.

    Additionally, the Healthy Boost Project, supports local families by providing fruit and vegetable vouchers helping to improve diets, access to healthy food, mental health, and overall wellbeing

    For more information and further examples of the work taking place, visit the dedicated website: www.fairerhealthierliverpool.org

    Councillor Harry Doyle, Cabinet Member for Culture, Health and Wellbeing said:   

    “Being recognised as a Marmot City reinforces our determination to build a Liverpool where every resident can thrive. 

    “It places health and equity at the centre of our future, ensuring that the next generation of children and young people grow up in a city where wellbeing is prioritised, and prevention is embedded into everything we do. 

    Professor Matt Ashton Director of Public Health said: 

    “This recognition is a proud moment as becoming a Marmot City confirms our commitment to health equity not just in policy, but in people’s everyday lives. 

     “We are expanding our focus to cover all eight Marmot principles, embedding community voices at the heart of decision-making, and driving change that is led by evidence and grounded in the lived experiences of our residents.”  

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Security: DEA’s National Take Back Day Returns April 26th to Help Prevent Prescription Drug Misuse

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Memphis, TN – The Drug Enforcement Administration, in coordination with more than 4,400 law enforcement partners across the country, will host the 28th National Prescription Drug Take Back Day Saturday, April 26, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m., offering communities across the United States a safe, convenient, and anonymous way to dispose of unneeded prescription medications.

    With nearly 4,500 collection sites nationwide, Take Back Day aims to reduce the risk of prescription drug misuse by helping Americans safely remove expired, unwanted, or unused medications from their homes—medications that might otherwise be misused.   

    “Disposing of unneeded, expired medications helps us protect the safety and health of our communities,” said DEA Acting Administrator Derek S. Maltz. “Families can minimize the risk of medications falling into the wrong hands by simply bringing unused medications to one of the 4,500 drop-off locations this Saturday. National Prescription Drug Take Back Day would not be possible without our incredible local and state law enforcement partners and the community groups who work every year to make Take Back Day a success.”

    “I encourage everyone to join us this weekend and participate in Take Back Day,” said Special Agent in Charge Jim Scott, head of DEA’s Louisville Division. “The small act of cleaning out your home medicine cabinet can have a big impact on the safety of our community by keeping addictive medications away from those who might abuse them.”

    DEA and its partners will accept tablets, capsules, patches, and other solid forms of prescription drugs. Liquids, such as cough syrups, must remain tightly sealed in their original containers. Take Back Day locations will accept vaping devices and cartridges if the lithium batteries are removed. Syringes, sharps, and illicit substances will not be collected.

    According to The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, opioids such as oxycodone, hydrocodone, codeine, and morphine are among the most frequently misused prescription pain medications. In October 2024, DEA and its partners collected nearly 630,000 pounds of medications. Since the program’s inception in 2010, more than 19.2 million pounds of medications have been collected and safely destroyed.

    For Saturday’s event, find a collection site near you by visiting www.DEATakeBack.com.  

    For those unable to participate on April 26, nearly 17,000 pharmacies, hospitals, clinics, and law enforcement locations offer year-round drug disposal options across the country to ensure Every Day is Take Back Day.

    ### 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Don Davis Remarks at Press Conference on First 100 Days of the 119th Congress

    Source: US Congressman Don Davis (NC-01)

    ROCKY MOUNT, N.C.  Congressman Don Davis delivered the following remarks at his press conference on the first 100 days of the 119th Congress:

    Hi, everybody! It is always great to be back home, in eastern North Carolina. I have worked to share the stories, concerns, and issues impacting eastern North Carolina families. Our district now spans 22 incredible counties, from the coastlines of Currituck and Camden counties through the farmland of Lenoir and Wayne counties to the heart of Oxford and everywhere between. My vision for NC-01 is: “We must meet our constituents where they are, ensuring they are seen and heard in Washington, D.C., to make life better for all families and provide hope and assurance they are not forgotten.” We work to achieve this daily.

    We’ve opened three new offices: 1. Rocky Mount, 2. Goldsboro, and 3. Elizabeth City. We held listening sessions in Camden, Currituck, Granville, Wayne, and Lenoir counties. Due to an increased interest in town halls, we hosted a telephone town hall with nearly 13,000 participants. So far this year, we helped close more than 240 constituent cases and returned over $821,000 to eastern North Carolina families, cutting through bureaucracy to return money directly to our neighbors. Our District Outreach Team has made over 156 visits to meet with constituents across the district, showing up, listening, attending events and meetings, and responding to issues. 

    During the 119th Congress, 11,750 constituents have reached out to the office. In comparison, during the 118th Congress, 8,745 constituents reached out to the office through April 14. The top three campaigns during the 119th Congress have been: 1) Protect Social Security, 2) Oppose the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and Elon Musk, and 3) Support the Ensuring Pathways to Innovative Cures (EPIC) Act.

    I have introduced 14 bills in the 119th Congress, including:

    1. H.R. 1060, Modern Authentication of Pharmaceuticals (MAP) Act of 2025: The first bill we introduced was the Modern Authentication of Pharmaceuticals Act, legislation that seeks to secure the United States drug supply chain and close vulnerabilities that allow counterfeit controlled substances, including lethal fentanyl, into our communities;
    2. H.R. 1244, Reducing Drug Prices for Seniors Act, legislation that reduces out-of-pocket expenses for Medicare patients by calculating the coinsurance cost at the pharmacy counter based on the drug’s net, or actual price, rather than its list price;
    3. H.R. 1298, Veterans Jobs Opportunity Act, legislation that sets a new business-related tax credit for the start-up expenses of a veteran-owned small business in an underserved community;
    4. H.R. 1363, Honor and Remember Flag Recognition Act of 2025, legislation that designates the Honor and Remember Flag, created by Honor and Remember, Inc., as a national symbol to honor service members who died in the line of duty;
    5. H.R. 1377, Sarah Keys Evans Congressional Gold Medal Act in recognition of her achievements relating to the desegregation of passengers on interstate buses in the 1950s. Before there was Rosa Parks, there was Sara Keys Evans;
    6. H.R. 1672, Maintaining New Investments in New Innovation (MINI) Act ensures lifesaving genetic treatments remain accessible;
    7. H.R. 1858, Flooding Prevention, Assessment, and Restoration Act would strengthen flood prevention measures and provide support for rural communities facing flood risks;
    8. H.R. 1985, Promoting Precision Agriculture Act, ensuring our growers have access to the cutting-edge precision agriculture technologies and broadband services necessary to do what they do best — feed, fuel, and clothe the American people;
    9.  H.R. 2043, Agricultural Commodities Price Enhancement Act, legislation that increases the reference price for seed cotton, peanuts, corn, soybeans, and wheat;
    10.  H.R. 2109, Cybersecurity for Rural Water Systems Act, ensures our water systems that rural communities and farmers rely on have the necessary protections to successfully guard against cyber-attacks;
    11.  H.R. 2541, Nuclear Medicine Clarification Act of 2025, legislation that would close a loophole that currently allows patients to be unintentionally exposed to high levels of radiation without reporting or disclosure. The legislation would improve care and ensure transparency for patients and simplify federal rules coming from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC);
    12.  H.R. 2542, Old Drugs, New Cures Act, legislation to improve access to innovative, affordable medication and tackle health disparities in rural and low-income communities across America;
    13. H.R. 2625, Veterans Employment Readiness Yield (VERY) Act, which updates outdated language. The VERY Act makes changes to let our disabled vets know that they are receiving the respect and dignity they have rightfully earned; and 
    14.  H.R. 2707, Protecting American Families and Servicemembers from Anthrax Act, ensuring the U.S. Department of Defense and Department of Health and Human Services develop a long-term stockpiling strategy that leverages the Strategic National Stockpile to enhance national preparedness.

    I am committed to: 

    1. Fighting for our farmers by advocating for a temporary pause on the Adverse Effective Wage Rate and pushing for a comprehensive Farm Bill that enhances commodity pricing. We also need continued support for agricultural assistance for farmers hurt by difficult times;
    2. Protecting Seymour Johnson Air Force Base. We are working to protect Seymour Johnson Air Force Base, including two visits and annual defense priorities focusing on F-15EX procurement, Child Development Center upgrades, maintenance dollars for F-15E aircraft, and $41 million in Combat Arms Training & Maintenance funds; 
    3. Building our local economy, by creating good-paying jobs in shipbuilding with Newport News Shipyard and the Global TransPark, a critical hub for jobs, logistics, and innovation, while addressing local government infrastructure needs.We are also working to address our Interstate, broadband, and housing needs;
    4. Enhancing our healthcare outcomes is vital. I support Martin County’s efforts to enhance its healthcare system and advocate for a new Health Sciences facility at Barton College by advocating for $10 million through Barton’s application to the Golden LEAF Foundation;
    5. On border security, I will continue supporting a secure border and meaningful immigration reform that respects our values. I have visited the ICE facility that services eastern North Carolina in Alamance County Detention Center and traveled as part of an Armed Services Committee CODEL to Naval Station Guantanamo Bay to gain firsthand insight into the role these facilities play in our border security strategy. Next week, I will travel to Lumpkin, Georgia to tour a regional ICE facility; 
    6. I will be filing key legislation that addresses federal recognition for the Haliwa Saponi Indian Tribe, support for the Southeast Crescent Regional Commission, and tax fairness for combat-injured Coast Guard veterans.

    Together, these efforts will contribute to a brighter future for our region. We’re not sitting on the sidelines. We are working hard every day on healthcare, agriculture, defense, and working families. 

    An early victory during the Trump Administration includes the decision by the Food and Drug Administration to formally withdraw and end the effort by the agency to consider a ban on menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars. As the Ranking Member of the Commodity Markets, Digital Assets, and Rural Development Subcommittee of the House Agriculture Committee, I am working on regulatory framework legislation for the crypto and digital assets industry that is a priority of the Administration.

    I also know that people are currently nervous about the state of the country and the world. 

    Specific concerns include: 1. Helene and agriculture assistance, 2. education funding reductions, and 3. tariffs.

    I voted in support of disaster assistance for Helene in the West and drought in the East. I am glad that economic assistance was included. But we are way short. We are a billion short for agricultural assistance alone.

    I visited North Lenoir High School in Lenoir County just this morning, one of the four public school districts in North Carolina that no longer has access to COVID-19-related funding that they had been promised because the U.S. Department of Education terminated their ability to liquidate those federal dollars.

    On Friday, I visited Halifax County Schools to discuss the same issue. 

    We are: 

    1. Sending a letter to the U.S. Department of Education Secretary Linda McMahon; 
    2. Seeking to schedule a meeting with the Secretary; 
    3. Reaching out to other North Carolina delegation members to consider a joint letter; and 
    4. Communicating our findings to the White House.

    For tariffs, eastern North Carolina cannot afford to be collateral damage in a trade war. We need tough and targeted trade policies, but our policies must also protect jobs, lower input costs, and keep our communities strong.

    Previously, I voted in support of the SAVE ACT. After speaking with North Carolina State Board of Election officials, I voted against it based on the concern that the bill cannot be implemented as drafted. While I support the intent of the SAVE Act that makes crystal clear only U.S. citizens should vote in elections, N.C. election officials have shared serious concerns about its implementation. The limited time for modernizing our information systems, uncertain taxpayer costs, and the need for clear standards to verify U.S. citizenship pose risks to administering federal elections. I remain committed to improving this bill and ensuring free and fair elections.

    We are meeting residents where they are. We read “Pete the Cat and His Magic Sunglasses” at St. Stephens Daycare. Federal funds for early childhood education remain important. I visited International Paper at Manson, spoke with quilters in Warrenton, and held a meeting with the Global TransPark. This morning, I traveled to N. Lenoir High School to look at their roof. 

    I plan to visit Pine Gates Renewables, Freedom Industries, and the Boys and Girls Club of the Tar River Region later today. Over the course of the next week, I will attend the 60th Annual Haliwa Saponi Blooming of the Dogwood Powwow, visit Airbus and Collins Aerospace, Barton College, Davita Kidney Care in Wilson, and Wilson Community College.

    I plan to meet with the Albemarle Area United Way, break ground at Elizabeth City State University for an aviation building, visit U.S. Coast Guard Elizabeth City, visit the Food Bank of Albemarle, and meet with the Perquimans County EMS director to discuss recovery efforts.

    As this is Holy Week, I wish everyone a wonderful Easter. Meanwhile, we will keep looking for opportunities to work with the Administration. Tax filing deadline was extended to May 1 for federal and state for all NC residents due to Helene. I encourage residents to file their taxes or an extension. We will keep advocating for our families, our farmers, our veterans, our students, and the future we believe in. May God bless eastern North Carolina, and our nation.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murray, Sanders, Baldwin Blast Trump Admin’s Attacks on Head Start, Demand RFK Jr. Immediately Release Funding and Reverse Firings

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray

    42 lawmakers write to RFK Jr. demanding answers on Trump admin’s actions undermining Head Start as Trump reportedly plans to eliminate the program

    Washington, D.C. — Today, Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), and Senator Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Ranking Member of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies, led a letter to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. calling out the Trump administration’s direct attacks on Head Start, reminding him of his legal obligation to administer the program, and demanding the Department of Health and Human Services immediately release Head Start funding and reverse the mass firing of Head Start staff and gutting of the offices that help ensure high-quality services are available for thousands of children and families across the country.

    “We write to express our strong opposition to the actions you have taken to directly attack and undermine the federal Head Start program. Since day one, this Administration has taken unacceptable actions to withhold and delay funding, fire Head Start staff, and gut high-quality services for children. Already this year, this Administration has withheld almost $1 billion in federal grant funding from Head Start programs, a 37 percent decrease compared to the amount of funding awarded during the same period last year,” write the lawmakers. “It is abundantly clear that these actions are part of a broader effort to ultimately eliminate the program altogether, as the Administration reportedly plans to do in its fiscal year 2026 budget proposal.”

    The lawmakers detail how the program plays an instrumental role in supporting kids and families across the country, writing: “Head Start provides early childhood education and comprehensive health and social services to nearly 800,000 young children every year in communities across this country, and employs about 250,000 dedicated staff. Head Start is a critical source of child care for working families, particularly in rural and Tribal communities, where Head Start programs are often the only option for high-quality child care services. Head Start programs ensure children receive appropriate health and dental care, nutrition support, and referrals to other critical services for parents, such as job training, adult education, nutrition services, and housing support.”

    “You even acknowledged the value of Head Start following a recent visit to a Virginia Head Start center,” the lawmakers write, contrasting that statement of support with the Trump administration’s actions. “However, as a result of your actions to withhold and delay funding and undermine the administration of this vital program, Head Start centers are in serious jeopardy and have already had their day to day operations impacted. Programs are increasingly worried that they will not be able to make payroll, pay rent, and remain open to serve the hundreds of thousands of children and families who depend on their services in communities across the nation.”

    “Since the very start of this Administration, Head Start programs have been under attack,” the lawmakers write, detailing office closures and funds that were frozen for Head Start grants across the country. “At one point, the National Head Start Association reported 37 programs serving nearly 15,000 children across the country could not access their federal funding. Head Start programs operate with thin margins and on short-term budgets from HHS, and without any communication from the Administration about the status of funding, programs were forced to temporarily close or to lay off staff.”

    The lawmakers underscore how the gutting of Head Start offices and the firing of staff who keep the federal program running puts the entire program in jeopardy: “On April 1st, you abruptly closed five of the ten regional offices that help local grantees administer Head Start programs in 22 states . This left hundreds of programs without dedicated points of contact to address mission critical issues like approving grant renewals and modifications, investigating child health and safety incidents, and providing training and technical assistance to ensure high-quality services for children. While some grantees were assigned a new program specialist, we understand many have not been receiving responses to their inquiries. This is on top of the estimated 97 Office of Head Start central office staff that were terminated due to their probationary status and the recent reduction in force. You promised ‘radical transparency’ as Secretary, yet it is unclear how these actions will improve Head Start programs, and you and your staff refuse to respond to basic inquiries and requests for information.”

    Importantly, they note that without funding that has so far not gone out the door, many more programs could be forced to close.

    “Head Start grantees are still waiting on payments and grant renewals from the Office of Head Start, including programs whose grants end on April 30th, 2025. These notices should have gone out by now, yet we are concerned to hear programs report they have received little to no correspondence regarding their grant renewals,” the lawmakers continue to detail how local Head Start programs are receiving no notice for the path forward for grant funding. “Additionally, because we started fiscal year 2025 under a short-term continuing resolution, as is usual, some grantees have only received partial funding for the first few months of the year. But with a full year funding bill in place, these grantees should have received full funding by now, yet some are reporting that they have not received the full amount of their grants and will run out of funds this month or next. On Wednesday, April 16th, the delays in Head Start funding led to the closure of Head Start centers serving more than 400 children in Sunnyside, Washington.”

    “The Administration has a legal and moral obligation to disburse Head Start funds to programs and to uphold the program’s promise to provide high-quality early education services to low income children and families across this country,” the lawmakers write. “There is no justifiable reason for the delay in funding we have seen over the last two months, and you have refused to offer any kind of explanation.”

    The lawmakers conclude by warning that eliminating the program would be devastating, demanding answers on the administration’s actions, and demanding the reversal of them: “[W]e urge you to immediately reinstate fired staff across all Offices of Head Start, and cease all actions to delay the awarding and disbursement of funding to Head Start programs across this country.”

    In addition to Senators Murray, Sanders, and Baldwin, the letter was signed by 39 colleagues, including Jack Reed (D-RI), Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI), Andy Kim (D-NJ), Ben Ray Lujan (D-NM), Charles E. Schumer (D-NY), Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE), Peter Welch (D-VT), Gary Peters (D-MI), Michael F. Bennet (D-CO), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Tina Smith (D-MN), John Fetterman (D-PA), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Christopher A. Coons (D-DE), Christopher S. Murphy (D-CT), Jeffrey A. Merkley (D-OR), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Tim Kaine (D-MN), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Edward Markey (D-MA), Angus King (I-ME), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Angela Alsobrooks (D-MD), and Mark R. Warner (D-VA).

    Full text of the letter is available HERE and below:

    Dear Secretary Kennedy:

    We write to express our strong opposition to the actions you have taken to directly attack and undermine the federal Head Start program. Since day one, this Administration has taken unacceptable actions to withhold and delay funding, fire Head Start staff, and gut high-quality services for children. Already this year, this Administration has withheld almost $1 billion in federal grant funding from Head Start programs, a 37 percent decrease compared to the amount of funding awarded during the same period last year. It is abundantly clear that these actions are part of a broader effort to ultimately eliminate the program altogether, as the Administration reportedly plans to do in its fiscal year 2026 budget proposal.

    Head Start provides early childhood education and comprehensive health and social services to nearly 800,000 young children every year in communities across this country, and employs about 250,000 dedicated staff. Head Start is a critical source of child care for working families, particularly in rural and Tribal communities, where Head Start programs are often the only option for high-quality child care services. Head Start programs ensure children receive appropriate health and dental care, nutrition support, and referrals to other critical services for parents, such as job training, adult education, nutrition services, and housing support.

    You even acknowledged the value of Head Start following a recent visit to a Virginia Head Start center, where you said, “I had a very inspiring tour. I saw a devoted staff and a lot of happy children. They are getting the kind of education and socialization they need, and they are also getting a couple of meals a day.”

    However, as a result of your actions to withhold and delay funding and undermine the administration of this vital program, Head Start centers are in serious jeopardy and have already had their day to day operations impacted. Programs are increasingly worried that they will not be able to make payroll, pay rent, and remain open to serve the hundreds of thousands of children and families who depend on their services in communities across the nation.

    Since the very start of this Administration, Head Start programs have been under attack. On January 27th, 2025, the Office of Management and Budget issued a memo (M-25-13) that suddenly froze the disbursement of grant funding for federal programs and services government-wide, including Head Start. Despite the Administration’s clarification that Head Start programs would not be the target of the funding freeze, many Head Start programs across the country were unable to draw down their grant funds through the Payment Management System (PMS) for weeks. At one point, the National Head Start Association reported 37 programs serving nearly 15,000 children across the country could not access their federal funding. Head Start programs operate with thin margins and on short-term budgets from HHS, and without any communication from the Administration about the status of funding, programs were forced to temporarily close or to lay off staff. In Wisconsin, the National Centers for Learning Excellence, which serves more than 200 children and their families, shut down for a week and laid off staff due to the funding freeze.

    On April 1st, you abruptly closed five of the ten regional offices that help local grantees administer Head Start programs in 22 states. This left hundreds of programs without dedicated points of contact to address mission critical issues like approving grant renewals and modifications, investigating child health and safety incidents, and providing training and technical assistance to ensure high-quality services for children. While some grantees were assigned a new program specialist, we understand many have not been receiving responses to their inquiries. This is on top of the estimated 97 Office of Head Start central office staff that were terminated due to their probationary status and the recent reduction in force. You promised “radical transparency” as Secretary, yet it is unclear how these actions will improve Head Start programs, and you and your staff refuse to respond to basic inquiries and requests for information.

    On March 14th, 2025, the Office of Head Start (OHS) notified all Head Start programs that “the use of federal funding for any training and technical assistance or other program expenditures that promote or take part in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives” will not be approved and that any questions should be directed to regional offices. Programs have not received any guidance for what would be considered “DEI” but this policy is potentially in direct conflict with statutory and regulatory program requirements, such as providing culturally and linguistically appropriate instructional services for English learners. Many programs cannot direct questions to regional staff, as half of regional offices were abruptly closed, and as unprecedented actions are being taken to delay and withhold funding, Head Start programs have been intentionally left with little to no guidance.

    Head Start programs are now arbitrarily required to provide justifications for each draw down of funds that is necessary to operate their programs, despite already receiving a federal grant award for these purposes. As of April 14th, Head Start programs have reportedly received correspondence from an email address “defendthespend@hhs.gov” requiring programs to submit a “specific description of why the funds are necessary and why they are aligned to the award” before programs can have funding disbursed. It has been reported that political appointees must sign off on every draw down of funds. This creates an illusion of improving oversight but only serves to add unnecessary red tape by requiring the manual sign off on hundreds of thousands of individual actions annually across the Department based on two to three sentence justifications. Already some grantees have reported delays in receiving funds, and have reported that furloughs or closures are imminent if funds are not released. For an administration that purports to value local autonomy and efficiency in federally funded programs, your actions have achieved the exact opposite.

    Finally, Head Start grantees are still waiting on payments and grant renewals from the Office of Head Start, including programs whose grants end on April 30th, 2025. These notices should have gone out by now, yet we are concerned to hear programs report they have received little to no correspondence regarding their grant renewals. Additionally, because we started fiscal year 2025 under a short-term continuing resolution, as is usual, some grantees have only received partial funding for the first few months of the year. But with a full year funding bill in place, these grantees should have received full funding by now, yet some are reporting that they have not received the full amount of their grants and will run out of funds this month or next. On Wednesday, April 16th, the delays in Head Start funding led to the closure of Head Start centers serving more than 400 children in Sunnyside, Washington.

    The Administration has a legal and moral obligation to disburse Head Start funds to programs and to uphold the program’s promise to provide high-quality early education services to low income children and families across this country. The fiscal year 2025 appropriations act provided $12.3 billion for Head Start, the same as the fiscal year 2024 level. The Head Start Act includes an explicit formula for how appropriated funds should be allocated. There is no justifiable reason for the delay in funding we have seen over the last two months, and you have refused to offer any kind of explanation. However, this week leaked fiscal year 2026 budget documents indicated the Office of Management and Budget was directing the Department, consistent with the Administration’s proposal to eliminate Head Start in fiscal year 2026, to “ensure to the extent allowable FY2025 funds are available to close out the program.” If this explains any of the delay in awarding fiscal year 2025 funding, we want to be clear, no funds were provided in fiscal year 2025 to “close out the program,” and it would be wholly unacceptable and likely illegal if the Department tries to carry out this directive.

    Finally, the leaked budget documents provided a justification, albeit brief, for eliminating Head Start in fiscal year 2026 that makes this Administration’s priorities clear and puts the Department’s actions over the last several months in context. The Administration argues that eliminating Head Start, “is consistent with the Administration’s goals of returning education to the States and increasing parental choice.” It is shocking to see an argument that eliminating a program that provides comprehensive early childhood care and education to 800,000 children and their families would increase parental choice. It is particularly concerning to see that argument in the context of the significant delay in awarding fiscal year 2025 appropriated funds and what that indicates about the intent behind the Department’s actions. We believe it is obvious that eliminating Head Start would be detrimental to hundreds of thousands of children and families. Similarly, we believe it is obvious that delaying funding like we have seen over the last two months, forcing Head Start programs to close, and leaving families to scramble to find quality, affordable alternatives puts the education and well-being of some of the most vulnerable young children in America at risk. In our view, that is unacceptable.

    Therefore, we urge you to immediately reinstate fired staff across all Offices of Head Start, and cease all actions to delay the awarding and disbursement of funding to Head Start programs across this country.

    Please provide us with a written response to the questions below no later than 10 days from receipt:

    1. Will you reinstate the staff who administer Head Start programs and reopen the closed regional offices responsible for overseeing Head Start programs in 22 states?

    a) When is HHS going to share information on the reorganization plan for the consolidation of the regional offices?

    b) Please provide the contact information for each program specialist designated to the 22 states who lost their regional office.

    c) Who is responsible for ensuring there are no delays or lapses in funding, nor any disruptions to Head Start program operations now that these states do not have a regional office?

    2. How many employees at the Offices of Head Start have been terminated, including the five regional offices and the central office?

    a) Which officials at HHS were involved in the staffing reduction decisions for OHS and what planning, if any, was undertaken prior to these reductions? Please describe the events that unfolded and name each office that was involved in the decision. Further, please name the official(s) who approved the staffing reductions.

    3. Can you confirm that the Administration will distribute all Head Start funds appropriated by Congress to Head Start programs in FY 25, as required by the Head Start Act?

    4. Please provide a list of all grantees with 5-year Head Start grant renewals that start between now and the end of the fiscal year: May 1st, June 1st, July 1st, August 1st, and September 1st.

    a) Will any funding be delayed for grantees that are due to receive their annual funding on May 1st or beyond?

    5. Why are funding awards delayed for grantees that received partial awards during the first continuing resolution for FY25?

    a) When can HHS guarantee that all funds will be awarded for partially funded Head Start programs?

    6. What is the “Tier 2” department for review that is delaying drawn down for Head Start programs in the Payment Management System?

    a) When should programs expect to receive their funds?

    b) Please provide all communication that went to Head Start grantees on the new review process.

    7. What guidance and clarifications have been provided to Head Start grantees on DEI expenditures?

    a) How is HHS evaluating Head Start programs’ expenditures and grant awards for DEI?

    b) What justifications are being used to prohibit DEI?

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Powering up communities with ag society dollars

    Source: Government of Canada regional news (2)

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: New beds improve care for incarcerated people with mental-health, addiction issues

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    New involuntary care beds are now open at Surrey Pretrial Services Centre, providing people in custody who are in crisis and have overlapping mental-health and addiction challenges, as well as brain injuries due to toxic-drug overdoses, with specialized involuntary care.

    “When someone’s severe mental-health and addictions care needs are not met, it often leads to a revolving door of crime and jail,” said Premier David Eby. “We’re taking action to break this cycle by adding new beds to help more people get the intensive care they need — to keep them safe and keep our communities safe.”

    Ten new beds will be available at the designated mental-health unit at Surrey Pretrial Services Centre, with the majority open now. Care will be provided to men in provincial custody who meet the criteria under the Mental Health Act (the Act). This service will help people who are incarcerated access care so they can stabilize on their pathway to recovery and improve overall long-term health outcomes.

    “As the toxic-drug crisis has changed, we’re seeing a small but growing group of people with severe mental-health and addictions challenges, coupled with brain injuries from toxic-drug overdoses,” said Josie Osborne, Minister of Health. “These beds will improve access to specialized mental-health and addiction care for people in provincial custody who have complex care needs and are part of our work to build services that work for everyone.”

    Provincial Health Services Authority will operate the designated mental-health unit. A permanent, dedicated space is being renovated and is expected to be operational in late fall or early winter 2025. In the meantime, as many as 10 beds are available now in the segregation unit while renovations are being completed.

    “By improving access to specialized care for people struggling with severe mental-health and addictions challenges, including those with brain injuries, we’re supporting both individuals and public safety,” said Terry Yung, minister of state for community safety and integrated services. “People will get the help they need while in custody, which can reduce the risk of repeat offences and improve outcomes when and if they are able to return to the community.”

    In addition to this measure, involuntary care beds at Alouette Homes in Maple Ridge will open in spring 2025. Work continues on more than 400 mental-health care beds at new and expanded hospitals in B.C., all of which can provide involuntary care under the act.

    The creation of new designated mental-health and substance-use treatment services under the act is a key recommendation from Dr. Daniel Vigo, who was appointed B.C.’s first chief scientific adviser for psychiatry, toxic drugs and concurrent disorders in June 2024.

    He was tasked with working with the health authorities, Indigenous partners and people with lived experience to analyze existing mental-health and addictions treatment services in B.C., review data and best practices, and look to other jurisdictions for proven solutions that can be implemented in the province.

    This is one part of the government’s work, which includes a focus on expanding voluntary supports and building mental-health and addiction services that work for everyone. The Province is increasing early intervention and prevention, treatment and recovery services, supportive and complex-care housing, overdose prevention and more.

    Quotes:

    Dr. Daniel Vigo, B.C.’s chief scientific adviser for psychiatry, toxic drugs and concurrent disorders

    “Through this new mental-health unit, our incarcerated patients will receive the level of psychiatric care they need the moment they need it. This will prevent the harms resulting from weeks of untreated agitation and psychosis, and allows the implementation of a care plan that will be sustained throughout their time in corrections. By integrating with community services when correctional supervision ends, this will both improve mental-health and substance-use outcomes and increase community safety.”

    Jennifer Duff, chief operating officer, BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services

    “This unit is an important step in providing urgent psychiatric, medical and substance-use care to incarcerated people. It will help stabilize individuals experiencing acute mental-health concerns or withdrawal symptoms and connect them to care. We will learn from this and potentially replicate the model in other areas of B.C. We will work with regional health authorities to ensure clients who are released from a provincial correctional centre have a team, and a care plan, to provide ongoing support.”

    Learn More:

    To learn how government is working to keep people and communities safe, visit: https://strongerbc.gov.bc.ca/safer-communities/

    To learn about mental-health and substance-use supports in B.C., visit: https://helpstartshere.gov.bc.ca/

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI Global: It’s World Immunization Week. How prepared is Canada if vaccines are needed for a new pandemic?

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Kelley Lee, Professor and Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Global Health Governance; Scientific Co-Director, Bridge Research Consortium, Simon Fraser University

    With the global resurgence of many vaccine-preventable diseases, World Immunization Week (April 24-30) provides a timely opportunity for Canadians to reflect on the goal of “Immunization for All.”

    The World Health Organization (WHO) raises awareness each year of the importance of equitable access to lifesaving and health-protecting vaccines. More than 154 million lives worldwide over the past 50 years have been saved by vaccines, excluding vaccines for COVID-19, malaria, influenza, human papilloma virus, and other deadly diseases.

    Immunization programs underpin 14 of the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The global eradication of smallpox, 99 per cent reduction of wild polio cases since 1988, and 40 per cent reduction in infant mortality are why vaccines are celebrated among public health’s greatest achievements

    Continued benefits from vaccines under threat in Canada

    Supported by a universal health-care system, strong public health infrastructure, and publicly funded programs, Canada has enjoyed a century of decline in diseases such as measles, diphtheria and pertussis thanks to vaccines.

    Recent trends, however, are cause for concern. A decline in vaccine confidence, worsening since the COVID-19 pandemic, challenges of access and the inclusion of vaccines in partisan political rhetoric have led to reduced vaccine uptake.

    In 2024, 17 per cent of Canadian parents were “really against” vaccinating their children, up from four per cent in 2019. The measles outbreak in Ontario, with more than 800 cases and 61 hospitalizations, are real consequences of these choices. The Council of Canadian Academies estimated that COVID-19 misinformation cost Canada more than 2,800 lives and $300 million in additional health-care and economic losses.

    Vaccines for future pandemics

    The spectre of a new pandemic looms with the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1). In the United States, infections in dairy cattle and on poultry farms continue.

    With vaccination likely playing a critical role in any public health response, the dismantling of parts of the American public health infrastructure, defunding of vaccine research and ramping up of political rhetoric against vaccines is highly concerning. The United States’s withdrawal from global health, including the termination of funding to GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance and WHO, is likely to profoundly harm global immunization programs and pandemic preparedness.

    Canada must take stock of this changing landscape. Chief Public Health Officer Theresa Tam’s 2024 report, Realizing the Future of Vaccination for Public Health, sets out a clear framework for realizing the full potential of vaccination in Canada.
    In addition to major investments in new vaccine development and biomanufacturing in Canada, this public health framework is designed to support a better co-ordinated national immunization system, concerted efforts to address public trust, and efforts to improve equitable access.

    Need for a national immunization registry

    The lack of integration of Canada’s fragmented immunization data across provinces and territories makes it more challenging to plan vaccine rollouts, identify coverage gaps or rapidly track adverse events after immunization. The Canadian Public Health Association and others have long called for a comprehensive and harmonized immunization registry as essential for a modern and responsive system.

    A national framework for vaccine data collection would allow policymakers and practitioners to make evidence-informed decisions in real time.

    Supporting public trust

    Sustaining high vaccination coverage begins with public trust in science, government and public health. While most people still trust science and scientists, what constitutes trustworthy sources of information has become a serious problem.

    Insufficient transparency around vaccine development, regulation and monitoring of adverse reactions needs addressing. Concerns about the rapid pace of scientific advances, including the 100-days mission to produce an effective vaccine for a future pandemic, must be recognized.

    With so many new vaccines expected to roll out in coming years, including new frontiers in neurodegenerative disorders and vaccines for certain cancers, a harmonized vaccine schedule would foster public trust. In this context, vaccine misinformation has become a serious problem.

    Centring equitable access and design

    The COVID-19 pandemic showed how structural inequalities reduced the ability to access vaccines.

    Initiatives during the pandemic to support equitable access — such as mobile clinics, culturally appropriate information and community-led initiatives — increased uptake. These approaches need to be extended to routine vaccination.

    Moreover, building supportive environments means incorporating an “equity by design” approach, which applies regulatory tools and systems design to support vaccine equity, from discovery to rollout means that the ability to keep vaccines refridgerated cold chains or needle delivery, for example, do not contribute to disparities of access.

    Bridge Research Consortium

    The Bridge Research Consortium (BRC) is a multidisciplinary team of social scientists and humanities scholars established in 2024 to understand the social and behavioural factors that influence new vaccine uptake in Canada.

    Bridging understandings across the “pipeline” for developing new vaccines and therapeutics, and the public health system, the BRC supports tailored and equity-informed strategies that enhance public trust and equitable access. We will hear directly from communities across the country, identify concerns in real-time, and co-develop approaches that reflect diverse perspectives. We plan to achieve this through demystifying how vaccines are developed and produced, holding deliberative dialogues that bring together diverse perspectives on challenging topics, and creating a travelling science exhibit. World Immunization Week is a timely reminder of the importance of this work to enable Canada to realize the potential benefits of vaccines.

    Immunity and Society is a new series from The Conversation Canada that presents new vaccine discoveries and immune-based innovations that are changing how we understand and protect human health. Through a partnership with the Bridge Research Consortium, these articles — written by academics in Canada at the forefront of immunology and biomanufacturing — explore the latest developments and their social impacts.

    Kelley Lee receives funding from the Canada’s Biomedical Research Fund, Canada Foundation for Innovation, and British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund to support the work of the Bridge Research Consortium. The BRC is one of 19 projects funded to support Canada’s Biomanufacturing and Life Sciences Strategy. She also receives funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and New Frontiers in Research Fund to conduct research on pandemic preparedness and response. She currently serves as a Commissioner on the National University of Singapore-The Lancet Pandemic Readiness, Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation (PRIME) Commission.

    Ève Dubé receives funding from the Canada’s Biomedical Research Fund, Canada Foundation for Innovation, to support the work of the Bridge Research Consortium. The BRC is one of 19 projects funded to support Canada’s Biomanufacturing and Life Sciences Strategy. She also receives funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Fonds de recherche du Québec to conduct research on vaccine acceptance.

    Janice E. Graham receives funding from CIHR and PHAC.

    Noni MacDonald receives funding from CIHR, CIRN grants related to immunization as well as PHAC and CPHA consultation fees related to immunization. She is a member of the Canadian Paediatric Society and the International Pediatric Society, a donor to Canadian Public Health Association and WHO, and on board of the journal Vaccine.

    ref. It’s World Immunization Week. How prepared is Canada if vaccines are needed for a new pandemic? – https://theconversation.com/its-world-immunization-week-how-prepared-is-canada-if-vaccines-are-needed-for-a-new-pandemic-254186

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Justice Department concludes inaugural Justice Forum

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development (DJCOD) has successfully concluded its two-day inaugural Justice Forum, aimed at creating an environment of collaborative governance and unified service delivery in the department.

    Held at the Brigitte Mabandla Justice College in Tshwane, the forum brought together senior leaders from across the department, including Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi, Deputy Minister Andries Nel, the Director-General, Advocate Doctor Mashabane executive management, provincial heads, and senior officials from the Master’s and State Attorney’s Offices.

    In her closing remarks, Kubayi reaffirmed the department’s commitment to strengthening South Africa’s justice system through decisive leadership, institutional reform, and improved service delivery.

    “Our focus must be on getting the basics right. Functional systems, responsive leadership, and a collaborative approach are fundamental to restoring public confidence and delivering accessible, efficient justice services,” Kubayi said.

    Moving forward

    The department noted that a central theme for the forum was modernisation and reform of the Guardian’s Fund.

    A central theme of the forum was the modernisation of the Master’s and State Attorney’s Offices, which continue to experience systemic inefficiencies, including backlogs, outdated processes, and capacity shortfalls. 

    Kubayi confirmed that comprehensive turnaround strategies will be implemented across the country, with a strong focus on digital transformation, leadership accountability, and service excellence.

    The forum acknowledged the need to restore public confidence in the Guardian’s Fund, which has been affected by cyber-related incidents in recent years. 

    The meeting also agreed on measures to strengthen security, improve oversight, and digitise operations to safeguard the integrity of the fund.

    A report was presented to the forum on the challenges at the State Attorney’s Office, including “high staff turnover and escalating litigation costs”.

    In response, the forum adopted a resolution to implement a centralised, streamlined organisational model supported by improved staffing structures, better use of technology, and tighter controls on the briefing of legal practitioners.

    The meeting resolved that the Office of the Solicitor-General will be fully capacitated to ensure effective coordination of litigation on behalf of the State.

    On the issue of human resources, the forum reached resolution to “reinforce a culture of ethical leadership and accountability across the department”.

    “[The forum] endorsed the centralisation of senior management appointments, updates to human resource policies, and the strengthening of provincial execution committees.

    “In alignment with national anti-corruption efforts, the Forum welcomed the introduction of lifestyle audits for senior managers, following a presentation by the Head of the Special Investigating Unit, Advocate Andy Mothibi,” the department said.

    The forum concluded with a clear set of resolutions for the 2025/2026 financial year, laying a strong foundation for a justice system that is accessible, people-centred, and grounded in integrity. – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI: Middlefield Banc Corp. Reports 2025 Three-Month Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MIDDLEFIELD, Ohio, April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Middlefield Banc Corp. (NASDAQ: MBCN) today reported financial results for the three months ended March 31, 2025.

    2025 Three-Month Financial Highlights (on a year-over-year basis):

      Earnings per share increased 17.6% year-over-year to $0.60 per diluted share
      Net interest margin expanded 15 basis points to 3.69%
      Return on average assets (annualized) increased 12 basis points year-over-year to 1.04%
      Asset quality improved from the 2024 fourth quarter with nonperforming assets to total assets decreasing by 6 basis points to 1.56%
      First quarter dividend payment increased 5% to $0.21 per share
         

    “The first quarter of 2025 was a strong period of growth, profitability and value creation for Middlefield,” stated Ronald L. Zimmerly, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer. “Total loans increased by 4% year-over-year to a record $1.55 billion, driven by stable economic trends within our Ohio markets, the strength of our balance sheet, and the continued execution of our strategic initiatives.  The 15-basis point expansion in our net interest margin is encouraging, reflecting our disciplined approach to pricing and ongoing efforts to reduce our cost of funds.  As a result, net income expanded by 15.9% year-over-year to $4.8 million, delivering a strong return on average assets of 1.04% and supporting a 5.5% increase in tangible book value per share(1), which reached $21.29 as of March 31, 2025.” (1) See non-GAAP reconciliation under the section “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations”.

    “During the quarter, we made significant upgrades to our infrastructure to support our multi-year technology road map. Additional investments in our physical footprint and back-office capabilities are planned throughout the year as we continue to strengthen Middlefield’s platform and support our long-term growth. We believe 2025 will be another good year of profitable expansion, reflecting our commitment to disciplined underwriting, community banking values, and ongoing reinvestment in the business,” concluded Mr. Zimmerly.

    Income Statement
    Net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2025, increased $1.1 million to $16.1 million, compared to $15.0 million for the same period last year. The increase was driven by strong loan growth and the impact of rate cuts on our short-term borrowings. The net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2025, was 3.69%, compared to 3.54% last year. 

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025, noninterest income increased $148,000 to $1.9 million, compared to $1.8 million for the same period in 2024.

    Noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2025, was $12.2 million, compared to $12.0 million for the same period in 2024. 

    Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2025, was $4.8 million, or $0.60 per diluted share, compared to $4.2 million, or $0.51 per diluted share, for the same period last year. 

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025, pre-tax, pre-provision net income was $5.8 million, compared to $4.8 million for the same period last year. (See non-GAAP reconciliation under the section “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations”.)

    Balance Sheet
    Total assets at March 31, 2025, increased 3.9% to $1.89 billion, compared to $1.82 billion at March 31, 2024. Total loans at March 31, 2025, were $1.55 billion, compared to $1.49 billion at March 31, 2024. The 4.0% year-over-year increase in total loans was primarily due to higher residential real estate loans, home equity lines of credit, and non-owner occupied loans, partially offset by a reduction in construction and other loans.

    The investment securities available-for-sale portfolio was $165.0 million at March 31, 2025, compared with $167.9 million at March 31, 2024.

    Total liabilities at March 31, 2025, increased 3.9% to $1.67 billion, compared to $1.61 billion at March 31, 2024. Total deposits at March 31, 2025, were $1.54 billion, compared to $1.45 billion at March 31, 2024. The 6.4% year-over-year increase in deposits was primarily due to growth in money market and interest-bearing demand deposits, partially offset by declines in time and noninterest-bearing demand deposit accounts. Noninterest-bearing demand deposits were 24.0% of total deposits at March 31, 2025, compared to 27.0% at March 31, 2024. At March 31, 2025, the Company had brokered deposits of $92.4 million, compared to $90.4 million at March 31, 2024.

    Michael C. Ranttila, Chief Financial Officer, stated, “We remain focused on proactively managing our funding sources to support loan growth, while optimizing our cost of funds. At March 31, 2025, we reduced our balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances by $62.4 million from December 31, 2024, and ended the first quarter with $346.9 million in additional borrowing capacity. The combination of high levels of potentially liquid assets, cash flows from operations, and additional borrowing capacity continues to provide us with excellent liquidity levels to support our long-term growth strategies and our legacy of returning excess capital to shareholders.”

    Middlefield’s CRE portfolio included the following categories at March 31, 2025:

                Percent of     Percent of     Weighted Average  
    (Dollar amounts in thousands)   Balance     CRE Portfolio     Loan Portfolio     Loan-to-Value  
                                     
    Multi-Family   $ 88,737       12.9 %     5.7 %     61.3 %
    Owner Occupied                                
    Real Estate and Rental and Leasing     61,835       9.0 %     4.0 %     55.7 %
    Other Services (except Public Administration)     32,815       4.8 %     2.1 %     54.1 %
    Manufacturing     18,397       2.7 %     1.2 %     44.7 %
    Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting     12,628       1.8 %     0.8 %     36.4 %
    Other     59,737       8.6 %     3.9 %     54.0 %
    Total Owner Occupied   $ 185,412       26.9 %     12.0 %        
    Non-Owner Occupied                                
    Real Estate and Rental and Leasing     343,169       49.9 %     22.1 %     55.5 %
    Accommodation and Food Services     40,039       5.8 %     2.6 %     55.9 %
    Health Care and Social Assistance     19,328       2.8 %     1.2 %     65.5 %
    Manufacturing     7,428       1.1 %     0.5 %     49.5 %
    Other     3,657       0.6 %     0.2 %     85.4 %
    Total Non-Owner Occupied   $ 413,621       60.2 %     26.6 %        
    Total CRE   $ 687,770       100.0 %     44.3 %        
                                     

    Stockholders’ Equity and Dividends
    At March 31, 2025, stockholders’ equity was $213.8 million, compared to $205.6 million at March 31, 2024. The 4.0% year-over-year increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily from higher retained earnings, partially offset by an increase in the unrealized losses on the available-for-sale investment portfolio. On a per-share basis, shareholders’ equity at March 31, 2025, was $26.46, compared to $25.48 at March 31, 2024.

    At March 31, 2025, tangible stockholders’ equity(1) was $172.1 million, compared to $162.8 million at March 31, 2024. On a per-share basis, tangible stockholders’ equity(1) was $21.29 at March 31, 2025, compared to $20.18 at March 31, 2024. (1)See non-GAAP reconciliation under the section “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations”.

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company declared cash dividends of $0.21 per share, totaling $1.7 million. Beginning in the first quarter of 2025, the Company increased the quarterly cash dividend by $0.01 or 5% from the previous quarter’s $0.20 per share cash dividend.  

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock.  The Company repurchased 43,858 shares of its common stock, at an average price of $24.00 per share during the same period in 2024. 

    At March 31, 2025, the Company’s equity-to-assets ratio was 11.32%, compared to 11.32% at March 31, 2024.

    Asset Quality

    For the 2025 first quarter, the Company recorded a provision for credit losses of $95,000, compared to a recovery of credit losses of $136,000 for the same period of 2024.  

    Net recoveries were $209,000, or (0.06%) of average loans, annualized, for the 2025 first quarter, compared to net recoveries of $68,000, or (0.02%) of average loans, annualized, for the same period of 2024.      

    Nonperforming loans at March 31, 2025, were $29.6 million, compared to $10.8 million at March 31, 2024. The increase in nonperforming assets is primarily the result of a $12.4 million loan moved to nonaccrual in the 2024 third quarter. The allowance for credit losses at March 31, 2025, stood at $22.4 million, or 1.44% of total loans, compared to $21.1 million, or 1.41% of total loans at March 31, 2024. The increase in the allowance for credit losses was mainly from changes in projected loss drivers, prepayment assumptions, curtailment expectations over the reasonable and supportable forecast period, and geographic footprint of unemployment data, as well as an overall increase in total loans.

    Mr. Ranttila continued, “Asset quality remains stable, with nonperforming assets to total assets of 1.56% at March 31, 2025, compared to 1.62% at December 31, 2024.  Nonperforming assets at March 31, 2025, included two relationships that moved into nonaccrual status in the second quarter of 2024 and one that moved into nonaccrual status in the third quarter of 2024.  We remain well reserved for potential credit losses with an allowance for credit losses to total loans of 1.44% at March 31, 2025, compared to 1.48% at December 31, 2024, and 1.41% at March 31, 2024.  We continue to expect stable economic activity across our Central, Western, and Northeast Ohio markets that will support loan demand and asset quality throughout 2025.” 

    About Middlefield Banc Corp.

    Middlefield Banc Corp., headquartered in Middlefield, Ohio, is the Bank holding Company of The Middlefield Banking Company, with total assets of $1.89 billion at March 31, 2025. The Bank operates 21 full-service banking centers and an LPL Financial® brokerage office serving Ada, Beachwood, Bellefontaine, Chardon, Cortland, Dublin, Garrettsville, Kenton, Mantua, Marysville, Middlefield, Newbury, Orwell, Plain City, Powell, Solon, Sunbury, Twinsburg, and Westerville. The Bank also operates a Loan Production Office in Mentor, Ohio.

    Additional information is available at www.middlefieldbank.bank.

    NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES

    This press release includes disclosure of Middlefield Banc Corp.’s tangible book value per share, return on average tangible equity, and pre-tax, pre-provision for loan losses income, which are financial measures not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP). A non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of historical or future financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts required to be disclosed by GAAP. Middlefield Banc Corp. believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide both management and investors a more complete understanding of the underlying operational results and trends and Middlefield Banc Corp.’s marketplace performance. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the numbers prepared in accordance with GAAP. The reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures are included in the following Consolidated Financial Highlights tables below.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
    This press release of Middlefield Banc Corp. and the reports Middlefield Banc Corp. files with the Securities and Exchange Commission often contain “forward-looking statements” relating to present or future trends or factors affecting the banking industry and, specifically, the financial operations, markets and products of Middlefield Banc Corp. These forward-looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. There are several important factors that could cause Middlefield Banc Corp.’s future results to differ materially from historical performance or projected performance. These factors include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant increase in competitive pressures among financial institutions; (2) changes in the interest rate environment that may reduce interest margins; (3) changes in prepayment speeds, charge-offs and loan loss provisions; (4) less favorable than expected general economic conditions; (5) legislative or regulatory changes that may adversely affect businesses in which Middlefield Banc Corp. is engaged; (6) technological issues which may adversely affect Middlefield Banc Corp.’s financial operations or customers; (7) changes in the securities markets; or (8) risk factors mentioned in the reports and registration statements Middlefield Banc Corp. files with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Middlefield Banc Corp. undertakes no obligation to release revisions to these forward-looking statements or to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this press release.

    Company Contact: Investor and Media Contact:
    Ronald L. Zimmerly, Jr.
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    Middlefield Banc Corp.
    (419) 673-1217
    rzimmerly@middlefieldbank.com  
    Andrew M. Berger
    Managing Director
    SM Berger & Company, Inc.
    (216) 464-6400
    andrew@smberger.com  
       

    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
    Consolidated Selected Financial Highlights
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, unaudited)

        March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
    Balance Sheets (period end)   2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    ASSETS                                        
    Cash and due from banks   $ 56,150     $ 46,037     $ 61,851     $ 50,496     $ 44,816  
    Federal funds sold     10,720       9,755       12,022       1,762       1,438  
    Cash and cash equivalents     66,870       55,792       73,873       52,258       46,254  
    Investment securities available for sale, at fair value     165,014       165,802       169,895       166,424       167,890  
    Other investments     1,021       855       895       881       907  
    Loans held for sale                 249              
    Loans:                                        
    Commercial real estate:                                        
    Owner occupied     185,412       181,447       187,313       182,809       178,543  
    Non-owner occupied     413,621       412,291       407,159       385,648       398,845  
    Multifamily     88,737       89,849       94,798       86,951       81,691  
    Residential real estate     351,274       353,442       345,748       337,121       331,480  
    Commercial and industrial     235,547       229,034       213,172       234,702       227,433  
    Home equity lines of credit     147,154       143,379       137,761       131,047       129,287  
    Construction and other     122,653       103,608       111,550       132,530       135,716  
    Consumer installment     5,951       6,564       7,030       6,896       7,131  
    Total loans     1,550,349       1,519,614       1,504,531       1,497,704       1,490,126  
    Less allowance for credit losses     22,401       22,447       22,526       21,795       21,069  
    Net loans     1,527,948       1,497,167       1,482,005       1,475,909       1,469,057  
    Premises and equipment, net     22,339       20,565       20,528       20,744       21,035  
    Goodwill     36,356       36,356       36,356       36,356       36,356  
    Core deposit intangibles     5,361       5,611       5,869       6,126       6,384  
    Bank-owned life insurance     34,866       35,259       35,049       34,802       34,575  
    Accrued interest receivable and other assets     28,581       35,952       32,916       34,686       34,210  
    TOTAL ASSETS   $ 1,888,356     $ 1,853,359     $ 1,857,635     $ 1,828,186     $ 1,816,668  
        March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
        2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    LIABILITIES                                        
    Deposits:                                        
    Noninterest-bearing demand   $ 369,492     $ 377,875     $ 390,933     $ 387,024     $ 390,185  
    Interest-bearing demand     222,953       208,291       218,002       206,542       209,015  
    Money market     481,664       414,074       376,619       355,630       318,823  
    Savings     189,943       197,749       199,984       192,472       196,721  
    Time     275,673       247,704       327,231       327,876       332,165  
    Total deposits     1,539,725       1,445,693       1,512,769       1,469,544       1,446,909  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     110,000       172,400       106,000       125,000       137,000  
    Other borrowings     11,609       11,660       11,711       11,762       11,812  
    Accrued interest payable and other liabilities     13,229       13,044       16,450       15,092       15,372  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES     1,674,563       1,642,797       1,646,930       1,621,398       1,611,093  
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                                        
    Common stock, no par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized, 9,960,503                                        
    shares issued, 8,081,193 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2025     162,195       161,999       161,916       161,823       161,823  
    Additional paid-in capital     515       246       108              
    Retained earnings     112,432       109,299       106,067       105,342       102,791  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (20,440 )     (20,073 )     (16,477 )     (19,468 )     (18,130 )
    Treasury stock, at cost; 1,879,310 shares as of March 31, 2025     (40,909 )     (40,909 )     (40,909 )     (40,909 )     (40,909 )
    TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY     213,793       210,562       210,705       206,788       205,575  
                                             
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 1,888,356     $ 1,853,359     $ 1,857,635     $ 1,828,186     $ 1,816,668  
                                             

    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
    Consolidated Selected Financial Highlights
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, unaudited)

        For the Three Months Ended  
        March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
    Statements of Income   2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
                                             
    INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME                                        
    Interest and fees on loans   $ 23,387     $ 23,308     $ 23,441     $ 23,422     $ 22,395  
    Interest-earning deposits in other institutions     291       320       348       386       437  
    Federal funds sold     155       151       143       122       152  
    Investment securities:                                        
    Taxable interest     530       528       528       505       467  
    Tax-exempt interest     960       961       962       966       972  
    Dividends on stock     150       170       191       198       189  
    Total interest and dividend income     25,473       25,438       25,613       25,599       24,612  
    INTEREST EXPENSE                                        
    Deposits     7,885       8,582       8,792       8,423       7,466  
    Short-term borrowings     1,347       1,128       1,575       1,920       1,993  
    Other borrowings     143       173       173       173       184  
    Total interest expense     9,375       9,883       10,540       10,516       9,643  
    NET INTEREST INCOME     16,098       15,555       15,073       15,083       14,969  
    Provision for (recovery of) credit losses     95       (177 )     2,234       87       (136 )
    NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION                                        
    FOR (RECOVERY OF) CREDIT LOSSES     16,003       15,732       12,839       14,996       15,105  
    NONINTEREST INCOME                                        
    Service charges on deposit accounts     989       1,068       959       971       909  
    Gain (Loss) on equity securities     (34 )     56       14       (27 )     (52 )
    Earnings on bank-owned life insurance     493       230       246       227       227  
    Gain on sale of loans     24       64       56       69       10  
    Revenue from investment services     268       237       206       269       204  
    Gross rental income           1                   67  
    Other income     204       258       262       251       431  
    Total noninterest income     1,944       1,914       1,743       1,760       1,796  
                                             
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE                                        
    Salaries and employee benefits     6,557       5,996       6,201       6,111       6,333  
    Occupancy expense     687       596       627       601       552  
    Equipment expense     225       221       203       261       240  
    Data processing costs     1,271       1,174       1,214       1,135       1,217  
    Ohio state franchise tax     399       390       399       397       397  
    Federal deposit insurance expense     267       293       255       256       251  
    Professional fees     598       611       539       557       558  
    Advertising expense     364       371       283       508       419  
    Software amortization expense     90       83       74       21       22  
    Core deposit intangible amortization     249       258       257       258       258  
    Gross other real estate owned expenses                             99  
    Other expense     1,486       1,810       1,819       1,797       1,619  
    Total noninterest expense     12,193       11,803       11,871       11,902       11,965  
                                             
    Income before income taxes     5,754       5,843       2,711       4,854       4,936  
    Income taxes     924       995       371       690       769  
                                             
    NET INCOME   $ 4,830     $ 4,848     $ 2,340     $ 4,164     $ 4,167  
                                             
    PTPP (1)   $ 5,849     $ 5,666     $ 4,945     $ 4,941     $ 4,800  
    (1)  See section “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for the reconciliation of GAAP performance measures to non-GAAP measures.
     

    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
    Consolidated Selected Financial Highlights
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, except per share and share amounts, unaudited)

        For the Three Months Ended  
        March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
        2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    Per common share data                                        
    Net income per common share – basic   $ 0.60     $ 0.60     $ 0.29     $ 0.52     $ 0.52  
    Net income per common share – diluted   $ 0.60     $ 0.60     $ 0.29     $ 0.52     $ 0.51  
    Dividends declared per share   $ 0.21     $ 0.20     $ 0.20     $ 0.20     $ 0.20  
    Book value per share (period end)   $ 26.46     $ 26.08     $ 26.11     $ 25.63     $ 25.48  
    Tangible book value per share (period end) (1) (2)   $ 21.29     $ 20.88     $ 20.87     $ 20.37     $ 20.18  
    Dividends declared   $ 1,697     $ 1,616     $ 1,615     $ 1,613     $ 1,613  
    Dividend yield     3.05 %     2.84 %     2.76 %     3.34 %     3.37 %
    Dividend payout ratio     35.13 %     33.33 %     69.02 %     38.74 %     38.71 %
    Average shares outstanding – basic     8,078,805       8,071,905       8,071,032       8,067,144       8,091,203  
    Average shares outstanding – diluted     8,097,545       8,092,357       8,086,872       8,072,499       8,096,317  
    Period ending shares outstanding     8,081,193       8,073,708       8,071,032       8,067,144       8,067,144  
                                             
    Selected ratios                                        
    Return on average assets (Annualized)     1.04 %     1.04 %     0.50 %     0.91 %     0.92 %
    Return on average equity (Annualized)     9.22 %     9.19 %     4.45 %     8.15 %     8.16 %
    Return on average tangible common equity (1) (3)     11.48 %     11.50 %     5.58 %     10.29 %     10.30 %
    Efficiency (4)     65.22 %     65.05 %     67.93 %     67.97 %     68.68 %
    Equity to assets at period end     11.32 %     11.36 %     11.34 %     11.31 %     11.32 %
    Noninterest expense to average assets     0.65 %     0.63 %     0.66 %     0.64 %     0.66 %
    (1)  See section “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for the reconciliation of GAAP performance measures to non-GAAP measures.
    (2)  Calculated by dividing tangible common equity by shares outstanding.
    (3)  Calculated by dividing annualized net income for each period by average tangible common equity.
    (4)  The efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing noninterest expense less amortization of intangibles by the sum of net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis plus noninterest income.
     
        For the Three Months Ended  
        March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
    Yields   2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    Interest-earning assets:                                        
    Loans receivable (1)     6.17 %     6.12 %     6.19 %     6.27 %     6.11 %
    Investment securities (1) (2)     3.69 %     3.63 %     3.62 %     3.59 %     3.52 %
    Interest-earning deposits with other banks     3.57 %     4.23 %     4.27 %     4.59 %     4.88 %
    Total interest-earning assets     5.81 %     5.78 %     5.84 %     5.92 %     5.77 %
    Deposits:                                        
    Interest-bearing demand deposits     2.13 %     2.07 %     2.16 %     1.93 %     1.86 %
    Money market deposits     3.38 %     3.81 %     3.93 %     3.95 %     3.81 %
    Savings deposits     0.82 %     0.75 %     0.71 %     0.64 %     0.58 %
    Certificates of deposit     3.93 %     4.21 %     4.49 %     4.57 %     4.06 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits     2.82 %     3.05 %     3.17 %     3.15 %     2.88 %
    Non-Deposit Funding:                                        
    Borrowings     4.58 %     4.93 %     5.54 %     5.60 %     5.61 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     3.01 %     3.21 %     3.41 %     3.45 %     3.23 %
    Cost of deposits     2.10 %     2.24 %     2.33 %     2.30 %     2.08 %
    Cost of funds     2.30 %     2.41 %     2.58 %     2.61 %     2.42 %
    Net interest margin (3)     3.69 %     3.56 %     3.46 %     3.51 %     3.54 %
    (1)  Tax-equivalent adjustments to calculate the yield on tax-exempt securities and loans were determined using an effective tax rate of 21%.
    (2)  Yield is calculated on the basis of amortized cost.
    (3)  Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
     

    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
    Consolidated Selected Financial Highlights
    (unaudited)

        For the Three Months Ended  
        March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
    Asset quality data   2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, unaudited)                                        
    Nonperforming assets (1)   $ 29,550     $ 29,984     $ 30,078     $ 15,961     $ 10,831  
                                             
    Allowance for credit losses   $ 22,401     $ 22,447     $ 22,526     $ 21,795     $ 21,069  
    Allowance for credit losses/total loans     1.44 %     1.48 %     1.50 %     1.46 %     1.41 %
    Net charge-offs (recoveries):                                        
    Quarter-to-date   $ (209 )   $ 151     $ 1,382     $ (29 )   $ (68 )
    Year-to-date     (209 )     1,436       1,285       (97 )     (68 )
    Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans, annualized:                                        
    Quarter-to-date     (0.06 %)     0.04 %     0.36 %     (0.01 %)     (0.02 %)
    Year-to-date     (0.06 %)     0.10 %     0.11 %     (0.01 %)     (0.02 %)
                                             
    Nonperforming loans/total loans     1.91 %     1.97 %     2.00 %     1.07 %     0.73 %
    Allowance for credit losses/nonperforming loans     75.81 %     74.86 %     74.89 %     136.55 %     194.52 %
    Nonperforming assets/total assets     1.56 %     1.62 %     1.62 %     0.87 %     0.60 %
    (1) Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans.
     

    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
    GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations

    Reconciliation of Common Stockholders’ Equity to Tangible Common Equity   For the Three Months Ended  
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, unaudited)   March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
        2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
                                             
    Stockholders’ equity   $ 213,793     $ 210,562     $ 210,705     $ 206,788     $ 205,575  
    Less goodwill and other intangibles     41,717       41,967       42,225       42,482       42,740  
    Tangible common equity   $ 172,076     $ 168,595     $ 168,480     $ 164,306     $ 162,835  
                                             
    Shares outstanding     8,081,193       8,073,708       8,071,032       8,067,144       8,067,144  
    Tangible book value per share   $ 21.29     $ 20.88     $ 20.87     $ 20.37     $ 20.18  
                                             
    Reconciliation of Average Equity to Return on Average Tangible Common Equity   For the Three Months Ended  
                                             
        March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
        2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
                                             
    Average stockholders’ equity   $ 212,465     $ 209,864     $ 209,096     $ 205,379     $ 205,342  
    Less average goodwill and other intangibles     41,839       42,092       42,350       42,607       42,654  
    Average tangible common equity   $ 170,626     $ 167,772     $ 166,746     $ 162,772     $ 162,688  
                                             
    Net income   $ 4,830     $ 4,848     $ 2,340     $ 4,164     $ 4,167  
    Return on average tangible common equity (annualized)     11.48 %     11.50 %     5.58 %     10.29 %     10.30 %
                                             
    Reconciliation of Pre-Tax Pre-Provision Income (PTPP)   For the Three Months Ended  
                                             
        March 31,     December 31,     September 30,     June 30,     March 31,  
        2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
                                             
    Net income   $ 4,830     $ 4,848     $ 2,340     $ 4,164     $ 4,167  
    Add income taxes     924       995       371       690       769  
    Add provision for (recovery of) credit losses     95       (177 )     2,234       87       (136 )
    PTPP   $ 5,849     $ 5,666     $ 4,945     $ 4,941     $ 4,800  
                                             

    MIDDLEFIELD BANC CORP.
    Average Balance Sheets
    (Dollar amounts in thousands, unaudited)

        For the Three Months Ended  
        March 31,     March 31,  
        2025     2024  
        Average             Average     Average             Average  
        Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost     Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost  
    Interest-earning assets:                                                
    Loans receivable (1)   $ 1,537,337     $ 23,387       6.17 %   $ 1,476,543     $ 22,395       6.11 %
    Investment securities (1) (2)     191,996       1,490       3.69 %     191,851       1,439       3.56 %
    Interest-earning deposits with other banks (3)     67,661       596       3.57 %     64,139       778       4.88 %
    Total interest-earning assets     1,796,994       25,473       5.81 %     1,732,533       24,612       5.78 %
    Noninterest-earning assets     84,542                       90,151                  
    Total assets   $ 1,881,536                     $ 1,822,684                  
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                                                
    Interest-bearing demand deposits   $ 220,192     $ 1,154       2.13 %   $ 211,009     $ 978       1.86 %
    Money market deposits     458,446       3,816       3.38 %     298,479       2,827       3.81 %
    Savings deposits     192,931       388       0.82 %     201,080       290       0.58 %
    Certificates of deposit     261,006       2,527       3.93 %     333,871       3,371       4.06 %
    Short-term borrowings     120,238       1,347       4.54 %     144,357       1,993       5.55 %
    Other borrowings     11,639       143       4.98 %     11,840       184       6.25 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     1,264,452       9,375       3.01 %     1,200,636       9,643       3.23 %
    Noninterest-bearing liabilities:                                                
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits     390,354                       400,209                  
    Other liabilities     14,265                       16,497                  
    Stockholders’ equity     212,465                       205,342                  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 1,881,536                     $ 1,822,684                  
    Net interest income           $ 16,098                     $ 14,969          
    Interest rate spread (4)                     2.80 %                     2.55 %
    Net interest margin (5)                     3.69 %                     3.54 %
    Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities                     142.12 %                     144.30 %
                                                     
    (1) Tax-equivalent adjustments to calculate the yield on tax-exempt securities and loans were $272 and  $281 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.
    (2) Yield is calculated on the basis of amortized cost.
    (3) Includes dividends received on restricted stock.
    (4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
     
        For the Three Months Ended  
        March 31,     December 31,  
        2025     2024  
        Average             Average     Average             Average  
        Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost     Balance     Interest     Yield/Cost  
    Interest-earning assets:                                                
    Loans receivable (1)   $ 1,537,337     $ 23,387       6.17 %   $ 1,517,051     $ 23,308       6.12 %
    Investment securities (1) (2)     191,996       1,490       3.69 %     191,390       1,489       3.63 %
    Interest-earning deposits with other banks (3)     67,661       596       3.57 %     60,241       641       4.23 %
    Total interest-earning assets     1,796,994       25,473       5.81 %     1,768,682       25,438       5.78 %
    Noninterest-earning assets     84,542                       88,205                  
    Total assets   $ 1,881,536                     $ 1,856,887                  
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                                                
    Interest-bearing demand deposits   $ 220,192     $ 1,154       2.13 %   $ 216,492     $ 1,126       2.07 %
    Money market deposits     458,446       3,816       3.38 %     393,298       3,768       3.81 %
    Savings deposits     192,931       388       0.82 %     197,257       373       0.75 %
    Certificates of deposit     261,006       2,527       3.93 %     313,582       3,315       4.21 %
    Short-term borrowings     120,238       1,347       4.54 %     93,200       1,128       4.81 %
    Other borrowings     11,639       143       4.98 %     11,690       173       5.89 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     1,264,452       9,375       3.01 %     1,225,519       9,883       3.21 %
    Noninterest-bearing liabilities:                                                
    Noninterest-bearing demand deposits     390,354                       404,428                  
    Other liabilities     14,265                       17,076                  
    Stockholders’ equity     212,465                       209,864                  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity   $ 1,881,536                     $ 1,856,887                  
    Net interest income           $ 16,098                     $ 15,555          
    Interest rate spread (4)                     2.80 %                     2.57 %
    Net interest margin (5)                     3.69 %                     3.56 %
    Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities                     142.12 %                     144.32 %
    (1)  Tax-equivalent adjustments to calculate the yield on tax-exempt securities and loans were $272 and $280 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.
    (2) Yield is calculated on the basis of amortized cost.
    (3) Includes dividends received on restricted stock.
    (4) Interest rate spread represents the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5) Net interest margin represents net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine (JOEM)

    Source: UNISDR Disaster Risk Reduction

    Mission

    ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine is an indispensable guide to good health in the workplace for physicians, nurses, and researchers alike.

    In-depth, clinically oriented research articles and technical reports keep occupational and environmental medicine specialists up-to-date on new medical developments in the prevention, diagnosis, and rehabilitation of environmentally induced conditions and work-related injuries and illnesses.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI: EverCommerce Announces Date of First Quarter 2025 Earnings Call

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    DENVER, April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — EverCommerce Inc. (NASDAQ: EVCM), a leading provider of SaaS solutions for service SMBs, will report its first quarter 2025 financial results after the U.S. financial markets close on Thursday, May 8, 2025.

    Management will host a conference call on Thursday, May 8 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time / 3:00 p.m. Mountain Time to discuss the Company’s financial results and provide a business update. Please visit the “Investor Relations” page of the Company’s website (https://investors.evercommerce.com/) for both telephonic and webcast access to this call; a replay will be archived on the website as well.

    About EverCommerce

    EverCommerce (Nasdaq: EVCM) is a leading service commerce platform, providing vertically-tailored, integrated SaaS solutions that help more than 740,000 global service-based businesses accelerate growth, streamline operations, and increase retention. Its modern digital and mobile applications create predictable, informed, and convenient experiences between customers and their service professionals. With its EverPro, EverHealth, and EverWell brands specializing in Home, Health, and Wellness service industries, EverCommerce provides end-to-end business management software, embedded payment acceptance, marketing technology, and customer experience applications. Learn more at EverCommerce.com.

    Investor Contact:
    Brad Korch
    SVP and Head of Investor Relations
    720-796-7664
    ir@evercommerce.com

    Press Contact:
    Jeanne Trogan
    VP of Corporate Communications
    512-705-1293
    press@evercommerce.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Definitive Healthcare Announces Timing of Its First Quarter 2025 Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    FRAMINGHAM, Mass., April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Definitive Healthcare Corp. (“Definitive Healthcare”) (Nasdaq: DH), an industry leader in healthcare commercial intelligence, today announced that it will report financial results for its first quarter ended March 31, 2025, on Thursday, May 8, 2025 after market close. The company will host a conference call and webcast at 5:00 PM (ET) / 2:00 PM (PT) to discuss the company’s financial results.

    A live audio webcast of the event will be available on the Definitive Healthcare’s Investor Relations website at https://ir.definitivehc.com/.

    A live dial-in will be available at 877-358-7298 (domestic) or +1-848-488-9244 (international). Shortly after the conclusion of the call, a replay of this conference call will be available through June 7, 2025 at 800-645-7964 or 757-849-6722. The replay passcode is 1765#.

    About Definitive Healthcare
    At Definitive Healthcare, our mission is to transform data, analytics, and expertise into healthcare commercial intelligence. We help clients uncover the right markets, opportunities, and people, so they can shape tomorrow’s healthcare industry. Our SaaS products and solutions create new paths to commercial success in the healthcare market, so companies can identify where to go next. Learn more at definitivehc.com.

    Media Contact:
    Bethany Swackhamer
    bswackhamer@definitivehc.com

    Investor Relations Contact:
    Brian Denyeau
    ICR for Definitive Healthcare
    brian.denyeau@icrinc.com

    Source: Definitive Healthcare Corp.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Risk of False Positive Results with Certain Capillary Blood Collection Tubes Used with Magellan Diagnostics LeadCare Testing Systems – FDA Safety Communication

    Source: US Food and Drug Administration

    Date Issued: April 24, 2025
    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is alerting health care providers and laboratory staff of reports that falsely elevated (false positive) results have occurred when using ASP Global’s RAM Scientific SAFE-T-FILL Micro Capillary Blood Collection tubes with the LeadCare Testing Systems. These tests may overestimate blood lead levels and give inaccurate results when processing capillary blood samples collected in these ASP Global’s RAM Scientific SAFE-T-FILL tubes. The root cause of these false results is not yet known. The FDA is recommending that ASP Global RAM Scientific SAFE-T-FILL tubes not be used with the LeadCare Testing Systems while this issue is being investigated.  False test results may delay an accurate diagnosis and may lead to improper patient management and unnecessary follow-up tests (with additional risks), increased stress for patients and families, and disruptions in care. Timely and accurate detection of elevated lead levels is essential to prevent the harmful effects of lead poisoning and ensure patients receive the right care without delay.
    The FDA is issuing this communication along with the following recommendations to mitigate the potential risk of inaccurate test results to assure that patients receive accurate information regarding potential lead exposure.
    Recommendations for Health Care Providers and Facilities, Laboratory Staff, and Patients and Caregivers

    Avoid using ASP Global’s RAM Scientific SAFE-T-FILL Micro Capillary Blood Collection tubes with the LeadCare Testing Systems.
    The capillary collection devices that are provided with the LeadCare Test Systems as well as other third-party capillary blood collection tubes, as described in the instructions for use of LeadCare Testing Systems, can still be used. 
    If no alternate capillary blood collection devices are available other than the ASP Global’s RAM Scientific SAFE-T-FILL Micro Capillary Blood Collection tubes, interpret results with caution and consider retesting with a different method or specimen type.
    Follow CDC’s recommendations for confirmatory venous blood testing based on blood lead levels observed in capillary blood lead tests (https://www.cdc.gov/lead-prevention/testing/index.html).

    Device Description
    The LeadCare, LeadCare II, LeadCare Plus, and LeadCare Ultra Blood Lead Tests are used to detect lead in a blood sample, which may be obtained from finger or heel prick (capillary). The current reports of inaccurate results are only with capillary samples collected in ASP Global RAM Scientific SAFE-T-FILL tubes. The LeadCare Testing Systems are used in clinical laboratories, doctor’s offices, clinics, and hospitals throughout the U.S. The LeadCare Test Kit includes capillary collection devices for use with the test system, and there have not been reports of falsely elevated results with the provided collection devices at this time. Sometimes third-party capillary blood collection tubes, sold separately, are also used for these tests. At this time, falsely elevated results have only been reported when ASP Global RAM Scientific SAFE-T-FILL Micro Capillary Blood Collection devices are used with the LeadCare Test Systems.
    FDA Actions
    The FDA is investigating the root cause of this issue with the manufacturers of the tests and collection tubes and will provide updates as critical information becomes available.
    Reporting Problems with Your Device
    Health professionals and patients are encouraged to report adverse events or side effects related to the use of ASP Global’s RAM Scientific SAFE-T-FILL Micro Capillary Blood Collection tubes, Magellan Diagnostics LeadCare Testing Systems, or other devices to the FDA’s MedWatch Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program: 

    By promptly reporting adverse events, you can help the FDA identify and better understand the risks associated with medical devices. The FDA regularly monitors the post-authorization use of tests, including reports of problems with test performance or results.
    Questions?
    If you have questions, contact CDRH’s Division of Industry and Consumer Education (DICE).

    Content current as of:
    04/24/2025

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – PFAS rules and public health – E-001467/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001467/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Pascal Arimont (PPE)

    The Clean Industry Pact included the adoption of measures for the chemicals industry by the end of 2025. It is also an important public health issue, not least because those measures will cover PFAS.

    In late March 2025, a meeting involving members of the Commission and a number of stakeholders was held on the topic[1]. Impact on health was also discussed (how to protect human health and the environment from toxic chemicals, including ongoing work on PFAS). Stéphane Séjourné and Jessika Roswall appear to be the only commissioners to have taken part in that meeting.

    Could the Commission please answer the following questions in this regard:

    • 1.How are DG SANTE departments and the Commissioner for Health involved in preparatory work for measures in the Chemical Industry Package and PFAS in particular?
    • 2.What proposals has the Commissioner for Health made to Commissioners Séjourné and Roswall to reduce the impact of PFAS on public health and limit the European population’s exposure to PFAS in the future?

    Submitted: 9.4.2025

    • [1] EU Reporter article, 25 March 2025, ‘Commission hosts a high-level meeting on the upcoming Chemicals Industry Package’
    Last updated: 24 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News