Category: housing

  • MIL-OSI: First Merchants Corporation Announces Fourth Quarter 2024 Earnings Per Share

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MUNCIE, Ind., Jan. 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — First Merchants Corporation (NASDAQ – FRME)

    Fourth Quarter 2024 Highlights:

    • Net income available to common stockholders was $63.9 million and diluted earnings per common share totaled $1.10, compared to $48.7 million and $0.84 in the third quarter of 2024, and $42.0 million and $0.71 in the fourth quarter of 2023. Excluding the impact of the branch sale and repositioning of the available for sale securities portfolio, adjusted net income available to common stockholders1was $58.1 million or $1.00 per share for the fourth quarter of 2024.
    • Strong capital position with Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio of 11.43% and Tangible Common Equity to Tangible Assets Ratio of 8.81%.
    • Net interest margin was 3.28% compared to 3.23% on a linked quarter basis and 3.16% in the fourth quarter of 2023.
    • Total loans grew $185.6 million, or 5.9% annualized, on a linked quarter basis, and $368.1 million, or 2.9% during the last twelve months.
    • Total deposits increased $156.5 million, or 4.4% annualized, on a linked quarter basis, and declined $32.4 million, or 0.2%, during the last twelve months after normalizing for deposits sold during the fourth quarter.
    • Nonperforming assets to total assets were 43 basis points compared to 35 basis points on a linked quarter basis.
    • Adjusted efficiency ratio totaled 53.60%1for the quarter.
    • Completed the sale of five Illinois branches and certain loans and deposits to Old Second National Bank on December 6, 2024.

    “The fourth quarter was a strong finish to the year and showed the momentum we have built with healthy increases in core earnings, NIM and ROA,” said Mark Hardwick, Chief Executive Officer of First Merchants Bank. “We restructured a portion of our securities portfolio and completed the Illinois branch sale to help prioritize our core markets. These actions and the completion of multiple technology initiatives in 2024 have positioned First Merchants to deliver strong results in 2025.”

    Fourth Quarter Financial Results:

    First Merchants Corporation (the “Corporation”) reported fourth quarter 2024 net income available to common stockholders of $63.9 million compared to $42.0 million during the same period in 2023. Diluted earnings per common share for the period totaled $1.10 compared to the fourth quarter of 2023 result of $0.71. Excluding non-core income and expenses incurred in each period, adjusted net income available to common stockholders1 for the fourth quarter 2024 was $58.1 million, or $1.00 diluted earnings per common share compared to $53.4 million, or $0.90 in the same period in 2023.

    During the quarter, the Corporation completed the sale of five Illinois branches along with loans of $7.4 million and deposits of $267.4 million, generating a gain of $20.0 million recorded in non-interest income. The sale of these branches represents the Corporation’s exit from suburban Chicago markets.

    Total assets equaled $18.3 billion and loans totaled $12.9 billion as of quarter-end. During the past twelve months, total loans grew by $368.1 million, or 2.9%. On a linked quarter basis, loans grew $185.6 million, or 5.9% annualized, with growth primarily in commercial loans.

    Investments totaling $3.5 billion decreased $350.7 million, or 9.2%, during the last twelve months and decreased $201.5 million on a linked quarter basis. The decline during the quarter was partially due to the sale of $109.6 million of available for sale securities with a weighted average tax-equivalent yield of 2.31%, which resulted in a loss of $11.6 million. The remaining decline for the quarter was due to security paydowns and maturities, as well as a decline in valuation of securities reflecting the movement of interest rates. Sales of available for sale securities in 2024 totaled $268.5 million and resulted in a loss of $20.8 million.

    Total deposits were $14.5 billion as of quarter-end and decreased by $299.8 million, or 2.0%, over the past twelve months. The decline was primarily due to the sale of the Illinois branches during the fourth quarter which included $267.4 million of deposits. Excluding this impact, deposits declined by $32.4 million in 2024. On a linked quarter basis, deposits grew by $156.5 million, or 4.4% annualized. The loan to deposit ratio increased slightly to 88.5% at period end from 88.0% in the prior quarter.

    The Corporation’s Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans (ACL) totaled $192.8 million as of quarter-end, or 1.50% of total loans, an increase of $4.9 million from prior quarter. Loan charge-offs, net of recoveries totaled $0.8 million and provision for loans of $5.7 million was recorded during the quarter. Reserves for unfunded commitments totaled $18.0 million declining during the quarter due to reserve release of $1.5 million. Net provision for the quarter totaled $4.2 million. Non-performing assets to total assets were 43 basis points for the fourth quarter of 2024, an increase of eight basis points compared to 35 basis points in the prior quarter.

    Net interest income totaled $134.4 million for the quarter, an increase of $3.3 million, or 2.5%, compared to the prior quarter and an increase of $4.3 million, or 3.3%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. Fully taxable equivalent net interest margin was 3.28%, an increase of five basis points compared to the third quarter of 2024, and an increase of 12 basis points compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. The increase in net interest margin compared to the third quarter was due to lower funding costs and a more favorable earning asset and funding mix.

    Noninterest income totaled $42.7 million for the quarter, an increase of $17.9 million compared to the third quarter of 2024 and an increase of $16.3 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. When excluding non-core income from each period, noninterest income totaled $34.4 million for the quarter, an increase of $0.4 million compared to third quarter of 2024, and an increase of $5.6 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2023. The increase in core noninterest income over the fourth quarter of 2023 was primarily due to an increase in gains on sales of loans and CRA investment income.

    Noninterest expense totaled $96.3 million for the quarter, an increase of $1.7 million from the third quarter of 2024 and a decrease of $11.8 million from the fourth quarter of 2023. The increase in the linked quarter was from higher marketing costs and other one-time operating expenses. The decrease from the fourth quarter of 2023 was due to one-time charges incurred in the prior year which included an FDIC special assessment, early retirement and severance costs, and a lease termination.

    The Corporation’s total risk-based capital ratio totaled 13.31%, common equity tier 1 capital ratio totaled 11.43%, and the tangible common equity ratio totaled 8.81%. These ratios continue to reflect the Corporation’s strong liquidity and capital positions.

    1 See “Non-GAAP Financial Information” for reconciliation

    CONFERENCE CALL

    First Merchants Corporation will conduct a fourth quarter earnings conference call and webcast at 11:30 a.m. (ET) on Thursday, January 30, 2025.

    To access via phone, participants will need to register using the following link where they will be provided a phone number and access code: (https://register.vevent.com/register/BIc49ad0293a7844dca2e7171f51e600dd95f36e86b6)

    To view the webcast and presentation slides, please go to (https://edge.media-server.com/mmc/p/9t5v76m2) during the time of the call. A replay of the webcast will be available until January 30, 2026.

    Detailed financial results are reported on the attached pages.

    About First Merchants Corporation

    First Merchants Corporation is a financial holding company headquartered in Muncie, Indiana. The Corporation has one full-service bank charter, First Merchants Bank. The Bank also operates as First Merchants Private Wealth Advisors (as a division of First Merchants Bank).

    First Merchants Corporation’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market System under the symbol FRME. Quotations are carried in daily newspapers and can be found on the company’s Internet web page (http://www.firstmerchants.com).

    FIRST MERCHANTS and the Shield Logo are federally registered trademarks of First Merchants Corporation.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This release contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe-harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements can often, but not always, be identified by the use of words like “believe”, “continue”, “pattern”, “estimate”, “project”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “expect” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will”, “would”, “should”, “could”, “might”, “can”, “may”, or similar expressions. These statements include statements about First Merchants’ goals, intentions and expectations; statements regarding the First Merchants’ business plan and growth strategies; statements regarding the asset quality of First Merchants’ loan and investment portfolios; and estimates of First Merchants’ risks and future costs and benefits. These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks, assumptions and uncertainties that may cause results to differ materially from those set forth in forward-looking statements, including, among other things: possible changes in monetary and fiscal policies, and laws and regulations; the effects of easing restrictions on participants in the financial services industry; the cost and other effects of legal and administrative cases; possible changes in the credit worthiness of customers and the possible impairment of collectability of loans; fluctuations in market rates of interest; competitive factors in the banking industry; changes in the banking legislation or regulatory requirements of federal and state agencies applicable to bank holding companies and banks like First Merchants’ affiliate bank; continued availability of earnings and excess capital sufficient for the lawful and prudent declaration of dividends; changes in market, economic, operational, liquidity (including the ability to grow and maintain core deposits and retain large, uninsured deposits), credit and interest rate risks associated with the First Merchants’ business; and other risks and factors identified in each of First Merchants’ filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. First Merchants does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, relating to the matters discussed in this press release. In addition, First Merchants’ past results of operations do not necessarily indicate its anticipated future results.

    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS      
    (Dollars In Thousands) December 31,
        2024       2023  
    ASSETS      
    Cash and due from banks $ 87,616     $ 112,649  
    Interest-bearing deposits   298,891       436,080  
    Investment securities, net of allowance for credit losses of $245,000 and $245,000   3,460,695       3,811,364  
    Loans held for sale   18,663       18,934  
    Loans   12,854,359       12,486,027  
    Less: Allowance for credit losses – loans   (192,757 )     (204,934 )
    Net loans   12,661,602       12,281,093  
    Premises and equipment   129,743       133,896  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock   41,690       41,769  
    Interest receivable   91,829       97,664  
    Goodwill and other intangibles   731,830       739,101  
    Cash surrender value of life insurance   304,906       306,301  
    Other real estate owned   4,948       4,831  
    Tax asset, deferred and receivable   92,387       99,883  
    Other assets   387,169       322,322  
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 18,311,969     $ 18,405,887  
    LIABILITIES      
    Deposits:      
    Noninterest-bearing $ 2,325,579     $ 2,500,062  
    Interest-bearing   12,196,047       12,321,391  
    Total Deposits   14,521,626       14,821,453  
    Borrowings:      
    Federal funds purchased   99,226        
    Securities sold under repurchase agreements   142,876       157,280  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances   822,554       712,852  
    Subordinated debentures and other borrowings   93,529       158,644  
    Total Borrowings   1,158,185       1,028,776  
    Interest payable   16,102       18,912  
    Other liabilities   311,073       289,033  
    Total Liabilities   16,006,986       16,158,174  
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
    Preferred Stock, $1,000 par value, $1,000 liquidation value:      
    Authorized — 600 cumulative shares      
    Issued and outstanding – 125 cumulative shares   125       125  
    Preferred Stock, Series A, no par value, $2,500 liquidation preference:      
    Authorized — 10,000 non-cumulative perpetual shares      
    Issued and outstanding – 10,000 non-cumulative perpetual shares   25,000       25,000  
    Common Stock, $.125 stated value:      
    Authorized — 100,000,000 shares      
    Issued and outstanding – 57,974,535 and 59,424,122 shares   7,247       7,428  
    Additional paid-in capital   1,188,768       1,236,506  
    Retained earnings   1,272,528       1,154,624  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (188,685 )     (175,970 )
    Total Stockholders’ Equity   2,304,983       2,247,713  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 18,311,969     $ 18,405,887  
     
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
    (Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) December 31,   December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    INTEREST INCOME              
    Loans:              
    Taxable $ 197,536     $ 197,523     $ 803,652     $ 747,837  
    Tax-exempt   9,020       8,197       34,262       31,954  
    Investment securities:              
    Taxable   9,024       8,644       36,086       35,207  
    Tax-exempt   12,754       13,821       53,487       58,117  
    Deposits with financial institutions   5,350       8,034       16,992       17,719  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock   958       771       3,527       3,052  
    Total Interest Income   234,642       236,990       948,006       893,886  
    INTEREST EXPENSE              
    Deposits   89,835       96,655       386,127       306,092  
    Federal funds purchased   26       1       481       1,421  
    Securities sold under repurchase agreements   680       827       3,057       3,451  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances   8,171       6,431       29,886       27,206  
    Subordinated debentures and other borrowings   1,560       3,013       7,341       10,316  
    Total Interest Expense   100,272       106,927       426,892       348,486  
    NET INTEREST INCOME   134,370       130,063       521,114       545,400  
    Provision for credit losses   4,200       1,500       35,700       3,500  
    NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES   130,170       128,563       485,414       541,900  
    NONINTEREST INCOME              
    Service charges on deposit accounts   8,124       7,690       32,606       30,837  
    Fiduciary and wealth management fees   8,665       8,187       34,215       30,840  
    Card payment fees   4,957       4,437       19,317       18,862  
    Net gains and fees on sales of loans   5,681       4,111       20,840       15,659  
    Derivative hedge fees   1,594       1,049       3,082       3,385  
    Other customer fees   316       237       1,547       1,880  
    Earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance   2,188       3,202       8,464       8,347  
    Net realized losses on sales of available for sale securities   (11,592 )     (2,317 )     (20,757 )     (6,930 )
    Gain on branch sale   19,983             19,983        
    Other income (loss)   2,826       (152 )     6,283       2,722  
    Total Noninterest Income   42,742       26,444       125,580       105,602  
    NONINTEREST EXPENSES              
    Salaries and employee benefits   55,437       60,967       221,167       228,745  
    Net occupancy   7,335       9,089       28,387       29,859  
    Equipment   7,028       6,108       26,802       24,113  
    Marketing   2,582       2,647       7,389       7,427  
    Outside data processing fees   6,029       5,875       27,140       25,165  
    Printing and office supplies   377       402       1,462       1,552  
    Intangible asset amortization   1,771       2,182       7,271       8,743  
    FDIC assessments   3,744       7,557       15,029       14,674  
    Other real estate owned and foreclosure expenses   227       1,743       2,076       3,318  
    Professional and other outside services   3,777       3,981       14,586       16,172  
    Other expenses   7,982       7,552       27,957       28,502  
    Total Noninterest Expenses   96,289       108,103       379,266       388,270  
    INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX   76,623       46,904       231,728       259,232  
    Income tax expense   12,274       4,425       30,326       35,446  
    NET INCOME   64,349       42,479       201,402       223,786  
    Preferred stock dividends   469       469       1,875       1,875  
    NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS $ 63,880     $ 42,010     $ 199,527     $ 221,911  
    Per Share Data:              
    Basic Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $ 1.10     $ 0.71     $ 3.42     $ 3.74  
    Diluted Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $ 1.10     $ 0.71     $ 3.41     $ 3.73  
    Cash Dividends Paid to Common Stockholders $ 0.35     $ 0.34     $ 1.39     $ 1.34  
    Average Diluted Common Shares Outstanding (in thousands)   58,247       59,556       58,533       59,489  
     
    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS              
    (Dollars in thousands) Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
      December 31,   December 31,
        2024       2023       2024       2023  
    NET CHARGE-OFFS $ 771     $ 3,148     $ 49,377     $ 25,643  
                   
    AVERAGE BALANCES:              
    Total Assets $ 18,478,303     $ 18,397,200     $ 18,400,495     $ 18,186,507  
    Total Loans   12,757,676       12,396,451       12,634,324       12,297,974  
    Total Earning Assets   17,089,198       17,222,714       17,054,267       16,991,787  
    Total Deposits   14,788,294       15,000,580       14,816,564       14,721,498  
    Total Stockholders’ Equity   2,312,270       2,130,993       2,252,491       2,127,262  
                   
    FINANCIAL RATIOS:              
    Return on Average Assets   1.39 %     0.92 %     1.09 %     1.23 %
    Return on Average Stockholders’ Equity   11.05       7.89       8.86       10.43  
    Return on Tangible Common Stockholders’ Equity   16.75       12.75       13.71       16.76  
    Average Earning Assets to Average Assets   92.48       93.62       92.68       93.43  
    Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans as % of Total Loans   1.50       1.64       1.50       1.64  
    Net Charge-offs as % of Average Loans (Annualized)   0.02       0.10       0.39       0.21  
    Average Stockholders’ Equity to Average Assets   12.51       11.58       12.24       11.70  
    Tax Equivalent Yield on Average Earning Assets   5.63       5.64       5.69       5.40  
    Interest Expense/Average Earning Assets   2.35       2.48       2.50       2.05  
    Net Interest Margin (FTE) on Average Earning Assets   3.28       3.16       3.19       3.35  
    Efficiency Ratio   48.48       63.26       53.55       55.17  
    Tangible Common Book Value Per Share $ 26.78     $ 25.06     $ 26.78     $ 25.06  
     
    NONPERFORMING ASSETS                  
    (Dollars In Thousands) December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,
        2024       2024       2024       2024       2023  
    Nonaccrual Loans $ 73,773     $ 59,088     $ 61,906     $ 62,478     $ 53,580  
    Other Real Estate Owned and Repossessions   4,948       5,247       4,824       4,886       4,831  
    Nonperforming Assets (NPA)   78,721       64,335       66,730       67,364       58,411  
    90+ Days Delinquent   5,902       14,105       1,686       2,838       172  
    NPAs & 90 Day Delinquent $ 84,623     $ 78,440     $ 68,416     $ 70,202     $ 58,583  
                       
    Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans $ 192,757     $ 187,828     $ 189,537     $ 204,681     $ 204,934  
    Quarterly Net Charge-offs   771       6,709       39,644       2,253       3,148  
    NPAs / Actual Assets %   0.43 %     0.35 %     0.36 %     0.37 %     0.32 %
    NPAs & 90 Day / Actual Assets %   0.46 %     0.43 %     0.37 %     0.38 %     0.32 %
    NPAs / Actual Loans and OREO %   0.61 %     0.51 %     0.53 %     0.54 %     0.47 %
    Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans / Actual Loans (%)   1.50 %     1.48 %     1.50 %     1.64 %     1.64 %
    Net Charge-offs as % of Average Loans (Annualized)   0.02 %     0.21 %     1.26 %     0.07 %     0.10 %
     
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS                  
    (Dollars In Thousands) December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,
        2024       2024       2024       2024       2023  
    ASSETS                  
    Cash and due from banks $ 87,616     $ 84,719     $ 105,372     $ 100,514     $ 112,649  
    Interest-bearing deposits   298,891       359,126       168,528       410,497       436,080  
    Investment securities, net of allowance for credit losses   3,460,695       3,662,145       3,753,088       3,783,574       3,811,364  
    Loans held for sale   18,663       40,652       32,292       15,118       18,934  
    Loans   12,854,359       12,646,808       12,639,650       12,465,582       12,486,027  
    Less: Allowance for credit losses – loans   (192,757 )     (187,828 )     (189,537 )     (204,681 )     (204,934 )
    Net loans   12,661,602       12,458,980       12,450,113       12,260,901       12,281,093  
    Premises and equipment   129,743       129,582       133,245       132,706       133,896  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock   41,690       41,716       41,738       41,758       41,769  
    Interest receivable   91,829       92,055       97,546       92,550       97,664  
    Goodwill and other intangibles   731,830       733,601       735,373       737,144       739,101  
    Cash surrender value of life insurance   304,906       304,613       306,379       306,028       306,301  
    Other real estate owned   4,948       5,247       4,824       4,886       4,831  
    Tax asset, deferred and receivable   92,387       86,732       107,080       101,121       99,883  
    Other assets   387,169       348,384       367,845       331,006       322,322  
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 18,311,969     $ 18,347,552     $ 18,303,423     $ 18,317,803     $ 18,405,887  
    LIABILITIES                  
    Deposits:                  
    Noninterest-bearing $ 2,325,579     $ 2,334,197     $ 2,303,313     $ 2,338,364     $ 2,500,062  
    Interest-bearing   12,196,047       12,030,903       12,265,757       12,546,220       12,321,391  
    Total Deposits   14,521,626       14,365,100       14,569,070       14,884,584       14,821,453  
    Borrowings:                  
    Federal funds purchased   99,226       30,000       147,229              
    Securities sold under repurchase agreements   142,876       124,894       100,451       130,264       157,280  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances   822,554       832,629       832,703       612,778       712,852  
    Subordinated debentures and other borrowings   93,529       93,562       93,589       118,612       158,644  
    Total Borrowings   1,158,185       1,081,085       1,173,972       861,654       1,028,776  
    Deposits and other liabilities held for sale         288,476                    
    Interest payable   16,102       18,089       18,554       19,262       18,912  
    Other liabilities   311,073       292,429       329,302       327,500       289,033  
    Total Liabilities   16,006,986       16,045,179       16,090,898       16,093,000       16,158,174  
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                  
    Preferred Stock, $1,000 par value, $1,000 liquidation value:                  
    Authorized — 600 cumulative shares                  
    Issued and outstanding – 125 cumulative shares   125       125       125       125       125  
    Preferred Stock, Series A, no par value, $2,500 liquidation preference:                  
    Authorized — 10,000 non-cumulative perpetual shares                  
    Issued and outstanding – 10,000 non-cumulative perpetual shares   25,000       25,000       25,000       25,000       25,000  
    Common Stock, $.125 stated value:                  
    Authorized — 100,000,000 shares                  
    Issued and outstanding   7,247       7,265       7,256       7,321       7,428  
    Additional paid-in capital   1,188,768       1,192,683       1,191,193       1,208,447       1,236,506  
    Retained earnings   1,272,528       1,229,125       1,200,930       1,181,939       1,154,624  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (188,685 )     (151,825 )     (211,979 )     (198,029 )     (175,970 )
    Total Stockholders’ Equity   2,304,983       2,302,373       2,212,525       2,224,803       2,247,713  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 18,311,969     $ 18,347,552     $ 18,303,423     $ 18,317,803     $ 18,405,887  
                       
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME                  
    (Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,
        2024       2024       2024       2024       2023  
    INTEREST INCOME                  
    Loans:                  
    Taxable $ 197,536     $ 206,680     $ 201,413     $ 198,023     $ 197,523  
    Tax-exempt   9,020       8,622       8,430       8,190       8,197  
    Investment securities:                  
    Taxable   9,024       9,263       9,051       8,748       8,644  
    Tax-exempt   12,754       13,509       13,613       13,611       13,821  
    Deposits with financial institutions   5,350       2,154       2,995       6,493       8,034  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock   958       855       879       835       771  
    Total Interest Income   234,642       241,083       236,381       235,900       236,990  
    INTEREST EXPENSE                  
    Deposits   89,835       98,856       99,151       98,285       96,655  
    Federal funds purchased   26       329       126             1  
    Securities sold under repurchase agreements   680       700       645       1,032       827  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances   8,171       8,544       6,398       6,773       6,431  
    Subordinated debentures and other borrowings   1,560       1,544       1,490       2,747       3,013  
    Total Interest Expense   100,272       109,973       107,810       108,837       106,927  
    NET INTEREST INCOME   134,370       131,110       128,571       127,063       130,063  
    Provision for credit losses   4,200       5,000       24,500       2,000       1,500  
    NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES   130,170       126,110       104,071       125,063       128,563  
    NONINTEREST INCOME                  
    Service charges on deposit accounts   8,124       8,361       8,214       7,907       7,690  
    Fiduciary and wealth management fees   8,665       8,525       8,825       8,200       8,187  
    Card payment fees   4,957       5,121       4,739       4,500       4,437  
    Net gains and fees on sales of loans   5,681       6,764       5,141       3,254       4,111  
    Derivative hedge fees   1,594       736       489       263       1,049  
    Other customer fees   316       344       460       427       237  
    Earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance   2,188       2,755       1,929       1,592       3,202  
    Net realized losses on sales of available for sale securities   (11,592 )     (9,114 )     (49 )     (2 )     (2,317 )
    Gain on branch sale   19,983                          
    Other income (loss)   2,826       1,374       1,586       497       (152 )
    Total Noninterest Income   42,742       24,866       31,334       26,638       26,444  
    NONINTEREST EXPENSES                  
    Salaries and employee benefits   55,437       55,223       52,214       58,293       60,967  
    Net occupancy   7,335       6,994       6,746       7,312       9,089  
    Equipment   7,028       6,949       6,599       6,226       6,108  
    Marketing   2,582       1,836       1,773       1,198       2,647  
    Outside data processing fees   6,029       7,150       7,072       6,889       5,875  
    Printing and office supplies   377       378       354       353       402  
    Intangible asset amortization   1,771       1,772       1,771       1,957       2,182  
    FDIC assessments   3,744       3,720       3,278       4,287       7,557  
    Other real estate owned and foreclosure expenses   227       942       373       534       1,743  
    Professional and other outside services   3,777       3,035       3,822       3,952       3,981  
    Other expenses   7,982       6,630       7,411       5,934       7,552  
    Total Noninterest Expenses   96,289       94,629       91,413       96,935       108,103  
    INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX   76,623       56,347       43,992       54,766       46,904  
    Income tax expense   12,274       7,160       4,067       6,825       4,425  
    NET INCOME   64,349       49,187       39,925       47,941       42,479  
    Preferred stock dividends   469       468       469       469       469  
    NET INCOME AVAILABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS $ 63,880     $ 48,719     $ 39,456     $ 47,472     $ 42,010  
    Per Share Data:                  
    Basic Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $ 1.10     $ 0.84     $ 0.68     $ 0.80     $ 0.71  
    Diluted Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $ 1.10     $ 0.84     $ 0.68     $ 0.80     $ 0.71  
    Cash Dividends Paid to Common Stockholders $ 0.35     $ 0.35     $ 0.35     $ 0.34     $ 0.34  
    Average Diluted Common Shares Outstanding (in thousands)   58,247       58,289       58,328       59,273       59,556  
    FINANCIAL RATIOS:                  
    Return on Average Assets   1.39 %     1.07 %     0.87 %     1.04 %     0.92 %
    Return on Average Stockholders’ Equity   11.05       8.66       7.16       8.47       7.89  
    Return on Tangible Common Stockholders’ Equity   16.75       13.39       11.29       13.21       12.75  
    Average Earning Assets to Average Assets   92.48       92.54       92.81       92.91       93.62  
    Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans as % of Total Loans   1.50       1.48       1.50       1.64       1.64  
    Net Charge-offs as % of Average Loans (Annualized)   0.02       0.21       1.26       0.07       0.10  
    Average Stockholders’ Equity to Average Assets   12.51       12.26       12.02       12.17       11.58  
    Tax Equivalent Yield on Average Earning Assets   5.63       5.82       5.69       5.65       5.64  
    Interest Expense/Average Earning Assets   2.35       2.59       2.53       2.55       2.48  
    Net Interest Margin (FTE) on Average Earning Assets   3.28       3.23       3.16       3.10       3.16  
    Efficiency Ratio   48.48       53.76       53.84       59.21       63.26  
    Tangible Common Book Value Per Share $ 26.78     $ 26.64     $ 25.10     $ 25.07     $ 25.06  
    LOANS                  
    (Dollars In Thousands) December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,
        2024       2024       2024       2024       2023  
    Commercial and industrial loans $ 4,114,292     $ 4,041,217     $ 3,949,817     $ 3,722,365     $ 3,670,948  
    Agricultural land, production and other loans to farmers   256,312       238,743       239,926       234,431       263,414  
    Real estate loans:                  
    Construction   792,144       814,704       823,267       941,726       957,545  
    Commercial real estate, non-owner occupied   2,274,016       2,251,351       2,323,533       2,368,360       2,400,839  
    Commercial real estate, owner occupied   1,157,944       1,152,751       1,174,195       1,137,894       1,162,083  
    Residential   2,374,729       2,366,943       2,370,905       2,316,490       2,288,921  
    Home equity   659,811       641,188       631,104       618,258       617,571  
    Individuals’ loans for household and other personal expenditures   166,028       158,480       162,089       161,459       168,388  
    Public finance and other commercial loans   1,059,083       981,431       964,814       964,599       956,318  
    Loans   12,854,359       12,646,808       12,639,650       12,465,582       12,486,027  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans   (192,757 )     (187,828 )     (189,537 )     (204,681 )     (204,934 )
    NET LOANS $ 12,661,602     $ 12,458,980     $ 12,450,113     $ 12,260,901     $ 12,281,093  
     
    DEPOSITS                  
    (Dollars In Thousands) December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,
      2024   2024   2024   2024   2023
    Demand deposits $ 7,980,061   $ 7,678,510   $ 7,757,679   $ 7,771,976   $ 7,965,862
    Savings deposits   4,522,758     4,302,236     4,339,161     4,679,593     4,516,433
    Certificates and other time deposits of $100,000 or more   1,043,068     1,277,833     1,415,131     1,451,443     1,408,985
    Other certificates and time deposits   692,068     802,949     889,949     901,280     849,906
    Brokered certificates of deposits1   283,671     303,572     167,150     80,292     80,267
    TOTAL DEPOSITS2 $ 14,521,626   $ 14,365,100   $ 14,569,070   $ 14,884,584   $ 14,821,453

    1 – Total brokered deposits of $955.7 million, which includes brokered CD’s of $283.7 million at December 31, 2024.
    2 – Total deposits at September 30, 2024 excluded $287.7 million of deposits reclassified to Deposits and other liabilities held for sale related to the Illinois branch sale. The sale of $267.4 million of deposits associated with the Illinois branch sale was subsequently completed on December 6, 2024.

    CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND NET INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS            
    (Dollars in Thousands)                      
      For the Three Months Ended
      December 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
      Average Balance   Interest
    Income /
    Expense
      Average
    Rate
      Average Balance   Interest
    Income /
    Expense
      Average
    Rate
    ASSETS                      
    Interest-bearing deposits $ 522,868   $ 5,350   4.09 %   $ 700,705   $ 8,034   4.59 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock   41,703     958   9.19       41,792     771   7.38  
    Investment Securities:(1)                      
    Taxable   1,677,554     9,024   2.15       1,801,533     8,644   1.92  
    Tax-exempt(2)   2,089,397     16,144   3.09       2,282,233     17,495   3.07  
    Total Investment Securities   3,766,951     25,168   2.67       4,083,766     26,139   2.56  
    Loans held for sale   36,219     550   6.07       16,355     246   6.02  
    Loans:(3)                      
    Commercial   8,753,723     156,414   7.15       8,533,233     159,190   7.46  
    Real estate mortgage   2,177,351     24,401   4.48       2,118,060     21,829   4.12  
    HELOC and installment   841,537     16,171   7.69       820,728     16,258   7.92  
    Tax-exempt(2)   948,846     11,418   4.81       908,075     10,376   4.57  
    Total Loans   12,757,676     208,954   6.55       12,396,451     207,899   6.71  
    Total Earning Assets   17,089,198     240,430   5.63 %     17,222,714     242,843   5.64 %
    Total Non-Earning Assets   1,389,105             1,174,486        
    TOTAL ASSETS $ 18,478,303           $ 18,397,200        
    LIABILITIES                      
    Interest-Bearing Deposits:                      
    Interest-bearing deposits $ 5,564,228   $ 37,049   2.66 %   $ 5,504,725   $ 40,996   2.98 %
    Money market deposits   3,189,334     25,463   3.19       3,096,085     27,909   3.61  
    Savings deposits   1,362,705     3,102   0.91       1,587,758     3,913   0.99  
    Certificates and other time deposits   2,313,284     24,221   4.19       2,225,528     23,837   4.28  
    Total Interest-Bearing Deposits   12,429,551     89,835   2.89       12,414,096     96,655   3.11  
    Borrowings   1,049,677     10,437   3.98       1,013,856     10,272   4.05  
    Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities   13,479,228     100,272   2.98       13,427,952     106,927   3.19  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits   2,358,743             2,586,484        
    Other liabilities   328,062             251,771        
    Total Liabilities   16,166,033             16,266,207        
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   2,312,270             2,130,993        
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY $ 18,478,303     100,272       $ 18,397,200     106,927    
    Net Interest Income (FTE)     $ 140,158           $ 135,916    
    Net Interest Spread (FTE)(4)         2.65 %           2.45 %
                           
    Net Interest Margin (FTE):                      
    Interest Income (FTE) / Average Earning Assets         5.63 %           5.64 %
    Interest Expense / Average Earning Assets         2.35 %           2.48 %
    Net Interest Margin (FTE)(5)         3.28 %           3.16 %
                           
    (1)Average balance of securities is computed based on the average of the historical amortized cost balances without the effects of the fair value adjustments. Annualized amounts are computed using a 30/360 day basis.
    (2)Tax-exempt securities and loans are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis, using a marginal tax rate of 21 percent for 2024 and 2023. These totals equal $5,788 and $5,853 for the three months ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
    (3)Non accruing loans have been included in the average balances.
    (4)Net Interest Spread (FTE) is interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets minus interest expense expressed as a percentage of average interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5)Net Interest Margin (FTE) is interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets minus interest expense expressed as a percentage of average earning assets.
     
                           
    CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND NET INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS            
    (Dollars in Thousands)                      
      For the Twelve Months Ended
      December 31, 2024   December 31, 2023
      Average Balance   Interest
    Income /
    Expense
      Average
    Rate
      Average Balance   Interest
    Income /
    Expense
      Average
    Rate
    Assets:                      
    Interest-bearing deposits $ 418,163   $ 16,992   4.06 %   $ 431,581   $ 17,719   4.11 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock   41,736     3,527   8.45       41,319     3,052   7.39  
    Investment Securities:(1)                      
    Taxable   1,759,578     36,086   2.05       1,854,438     35,207   1.90  
    Tax-exempt(2)   2,200,466     67,705   3.08       2,366,475     73,566   3.11  
    Total Investment Securities   3,960,044     103,791   2.62       4,220,913     108,773   2.58  
    Loans held for sale   29,650     1,792   6.04       21,766     1,292   5.94  
    Loans:(3)                      
    Commercial   8,687,638     641,393   7.38       8,519,706     603,611   7.08  
    Real estate mortgage   2,158,743     94,890   4.40       2,035,488     82,183   4.04  
    HELOC and installment   830,079     65,577   7.90       830,006     60,751   7.32  
    Tax-exempt(2)   928,214     43,370   4.67       891,008     40,448   4.54  
    Total Loans   12,634,324     847,022   6.70       12,297,974     788,285   6.41  
    Total Earning Assets   17,054,267     971,332   5.69 %     16,991,787     917,829   5.40 %
    Total Non-Earning Assets   1,346,228             1,194,720        
    Total Assets $ 18,400,495           $ 18,186,507        
    Liabilities:                      
    Interest-Bearing deposits:                      
    Interest-bearing deposits $ 5,506,492   $ 157,984   2.87 %   $ 5,435,733   $ 138,012   2.54 %
    Money market deposits   3,061,461     106,026   3.46       2,884,271     83,777   2.90  
    Savings deposits   1,463,707     14,587   1.00       1,694,230     14,606   0.86  
    Certificates and other time deposits   2,413,900     107,530   4.45       1,923,268     69,697   3.62  
    Total Interest-Bearing Deposits   12,445,560     386,127   3.10       11,937,502     306,092   2.56  
    Borrowings   1,005,017     40,765   4.06       1,111,472     42,394   3.81  
    Total Interest-Bearing Liabilities   13,450,577     426,892   3.17       13,048,974     348,486   2.67  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits   2,371,004             2,783,996        
    Other liabilities   326,423             226,275        
    Total Liabilities   16,148,004             16,059,245        
    Stockholders’ Equity   2,252,491             2,127,262        
    Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $ 18,400,495     426,892       $ 18,186,507     348,486    
    Net Interest Income (FTE)     $ 544,440           $ 569,343    
    Net Interest Spread (FTE)(4)         2.52 %           2.73 %
                           
    Net Interest Margin (FTE):                      
    Interest Income (FTE) / Average Earning Assets         5.69 %           5.40 %
    Interest Expense / Average Earning Assets         2.50 %           2.05 %
    Net Interest Margin (FTE)(5)         3.19 %           3.35 %
                           
    (1)Average balance of securities is computed based on the average of the historical amortized cost balances without the effects of the fair value adjustments. Annualized amounts are computed using a 30/360 day basis.
    (2)Tax-exempt securities and loans are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis, using a marginal tax rate of 21 percent for 2024 and 2023. These totals equal $23,326 and $23,943 for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.
    (3)Non accruing loans have been included in the average balances.           
    (4)Net Interest Spread (FTE) is interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets minus interest expense expressed as a percentage of average interest-bearing liabilities.
    (5)Net Interest Margin (FTE) is interest income expressed as a percentage of average earning assets minus interest expense expressed as a percentage of average earning assets.
     
    ADJUSTED NET INCOME AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE – NON-GAAP
    (Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts) Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
      December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
        2024       2024       2024       2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net Income Available to Common Stockholders – GAAP $ 63,880     $ 48,719     $ 39,456     $ 47,472     $ 42,010     $ 199,527     $ 221,911  
    Adjustments:                          
    PPP loan income                           (7 )           (49 )
    Net realized losses on sales of available for sale securities   11,592       9,114       49       2       2,317       20,757       6,930  
    Gain on branch sale   (19,983 )                             (19,983 )      
    Non-core expenses1,2,3   762                   3,481       12,682       4,243       12,682  
    Tax on adjustments   1,851       (2,220 )     (12 )     (848 )     (3,652 )     (1,229 )     (4,767 )
    Adjusted Net Income Available to Common Stockholders – Non-GAAP $ 58,102     $ 55,613     $ 39,493     $ 50,107     $ 53,350     $ 203,315     $ 236,707  
                               
    Average Diluted Common Shares Outstanding (in thousands)   58,247       58,289       58,328       59,273       59,556       58,533       59,489  
                               
    Diluted Earnings Per Common Share – GAAP $ 1.10     $ 0.84     $ 0.68     $ 0.80     $ 0.71     $ 3.41     $ 3.73  
    Adjustments:                          
    PPP loan income                                        
    Net realized losses on sales of available for sale securities   0.20       0.15                   0.04       0.35       0.12  
    Gain on branch sale   (0.34 )                             (0.34 )      
    Non-core expenses1,2,3   0.01                   0.06       0.21       0.07       0.21  
    Tax on adjustments   0.03       (0.04 )           (0.01 )     (0.06 )     (0.02 )     (0.08 )
    Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Common Share – Non-GAAP $ 1.00     $ 0.95     $ 0.68     $ 0.85     $ 0.90     $ 3.47     $ 3.98  

    1 – Non-core expenses in 4Q24 included $0.8 million of costs directly related to the branch sale.
    2 – Non-core expenses in 1Q24 included $2.4 million from duplicative online banking conversion costs and $1.1 million from the FDIC special assessment.
    3 – Non-core expenses in 4Q23 included $6.3 million from early retirement and severance costs, $4.3 million from the FDIC special assessment, and $2.1 million from a lease termination.

    NET INTEREST MARGIN (“NIM”), ADJUSTED                
    (Dollars in Thousands)                
      Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
      December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
        2024       2024       2024       2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Net Interest Income (GAAP) $ 134,370     $ 131,110     $ 128,571     $ 127,063     $ 130,063     $ 521,114     $ 545,400  
    Fully Taxable Equivalent (“FTE”) Adjustment   5,788       5,883       5,859       5,795       5,853       23,326       23,943  
    Net Interest Income (FTE) (non-GAAP) $ 140,158     $ 136,993     $ 134,430     $ 132,858     $ 135,916     $ 544,440     $ 569,343  
                               
    Average Earning Assets (GAAP) $ 17,089,198     $ 16,990,358     $ 17,013,984     $ 17,123,851     $ 17,222,714     $ 17,054,267     $ 16,991,787  
    Net Interest Margin (GAAP)   3.15 %     3.09 %     3.02 %     2.97 %     3.02 %     3.06 %     3.21 %
    Net Interest Margin (FTE) (non-GAAP)   3.28 %     3.23 %     3.16 %     3.10 %     3.16 %     3.19 %     3.35 %
     
    RETURN ON TANGIBLE COMMON EQUITY – NON-GAAP
    (Dollars In Thousands) Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
      December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
        2024       2024       2024       2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Total Average Stockholders’ Equity (GAAP) $ 2,312,270     $ 2,251,547     $ 2,203,361     $ 2,242,139     $ 2,130,993     $ 2,252,491     $ 2,127,262  
    Less: Average Preferred Stock   (25,125 )     (25,125 )     (25,125 )     (25,125 )     (25,125 )     (25,125 )     (25,125 )
    Less: Average Intangible Assets, Net of Tax   (728,218 )     (729,581 )     (730,980 )     (732,432 )     (734,007 )     (730,295 )     (736,601 )
    Average Tangible Common Equity, Net of Tax (Non-GAAP) $ 1,558,927     $ 1,496,841     $ 1,447,256     $ 1,484,582     $ 1,371,861     $ 1,497,071     $ 1,365,536  
                               
    Net Income Available to Common Stockholders (GAAP) $ 63,880     $ 48,719     $ 39,456     $ 47,472     $ 42,010     $ 199,527     $ 221,911  
    Plus: Intangible Asset Amortization, Net of Tax   1,399       1,399       1,399       1,546       1,724       5,744       6,906  
    Tangible Net Income (Non-GAAP) $ 65,279     $ 50,118     $ 40,855     $ 49,018     $ 43,734     $ 205,271     $ 228,817  
                               
    Return on Tangible Common Equity (Non-GAAP)   16.75 %     13.39 %     11.29 %     13.21 %     12.75 %     13.71 %     16.76 %
     
    EFFICIENCY RATIO – NON-GAAP                          
    (Dollars In Thousands) Three Months Ended   Twelve Months Ended
      December 31,   September 30,   June 30,   March 31,   December 31,   December 31,   December 31,
        2024       2024       2024       2024       2023       2024       2023  
    Non Interest Expense (GAAP) $ 96,289     $ 94,629     $ 91,413     $ 96,935     $ 108,103     $ 379,266     $ 388,270  
    Less: Intangible Asset Amortization   (1,771 )     (1,772 )     (1,771 )     (1,957 )     (2,182 )     (7,271 )     (8,743 )
    Less: OREO and Foreclosure Expenses   (227 )     (942 )     (373 )     (534 )     (1,743 )     (2,076 )     (3,318 )
    Adjusted Non Interest Expense (Non-GAAP) $ 94,291     $ 91,915     $ 89,269     $ 94,444     $ 104,178     $ 369,919     $ 376,209  
                               
    Net Interest Income (GAAP) $ 134,370     $ 131,110     $ 128,571     $ 127,063     $ 130,063     $ 521,114     $ 545,400  
    Plus: Fully Taxable Equivalent Adjustment   5,788       5,883       5,859       5,795       5,853       23,326       23,943  
    Net Interest Income on a Fully Taxable Equivalent Basis (Non-GAAP) $ 140,158     $ 136,993     $ 134,430     $ 132,858     $ 135,916     $ 544,440     $ 569,343  
                               
    Non Interest Income (GAAP) $ 42,742     $ 24,866     $ 31,334     $ 26,638     $ 26,444     $ 125,580     $ 105,602  
    Less: Investment Securities (Gains) Losses   11,592       9,114       49       2       2,317       20,757       6,930  
    Adjusted Non Interest Income (Non-GAAP) $ 54,334     $ 33,980     $ 31,383     $ 26,640     $ 28,761     $ 146,337     $ 112,532  
    Adjusted Revenue (Non-GAAP) $ 194,492     $ 170,973     $ 165,813     $ 159,498     $ 164,677     $ 690,777     $ 681,875  
    Efficiency Ratio (Non-GAAP)   48.48 %     53.76 %     53.84 %     59.21 %     63.26 %     53.55 %     55.17 %
                               
    Adjusted Non Interest Expense (Non-GAAP) $ 94,291     $ 91,915     $ 89,269     $ 94,444     $ 104,178     $ 369,919     $ 376,209  
    Less: Acquisition-related Expenses                                        
    Less: Non-core Expenses1,2,3   (762 )                 (3,481 )     (12,682 )     (4,243 )     (12,682 )
    Adjusted Non Interest Expense Excluding Non-core Expenses (Non-GAAP) $ 93,529     $ 91,915     $ 89,269     $ 90,963     $ 91,496     $ 365,676     $ 363,527  
                               
    Adjusted Revenue (Non-GAAP) $ 194,492     $ 170,973     $ 165,813     $ 159,498     $ 164,677     $ 690,777     $ 681,875  
    Less: Gain on Branch Sale   (19,983 )                             (19,983 )      
    Adjusted Revenue Excluding Gain on Branch Sale (Non-GAAP) $ 174,509     $ 170,973     $ 165,813     $ 159,498     $ 164,677     $ 670,794     $ 681,875  
    Adjusted Efficiency Ratio (Non-GAAP)   53.60 %     53.76 %     53.84 %     57.03 %     55.56 %     54.51 %     53.31 %

    1 – Non-core expenses in 4Q24 included $0.8 million of costs directly related to the branch sale.
    2 – Non-core expenses in 1Q24 included $2.4 million from duplicative online banking conversion costs and $1.1 million from the FDIC special assessment.
    3 – Non-core expenses in 4Q23 included $6.3 million from early retirement and severance costs, $4.3 million from the FDIC special assessment, and $2.1 million from a lease termination.

    For more information, contact:
    Nicole M. Weaver, Vice President and Director of Corporate Administration
    765-521-7619
    http://www.firstmerchants.com

    SOURCE: First Merchants Corporation, Muncie, Indiana

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial News: December saw an expected cooling in corporate and consumer lending

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Central Bank of Russia –

    The corporate loan portfolio decreased by 0.2% in December due to the repayment of a number of large foreign currency loans. Overall, for 2024, growth was 17.9%, which is comparable to 2023. More than half of the growth came from segments that are less sensitive to rate increases – lending for investment programs that have already begun and housing construction.

    The effect of macroprudential restrictions and the increase in rates led to a reduction in unsecured consumer lending by 1.9%. However, given the high rates of lending dynamics observed in the spring and summer, by the end of 2024 the portfolio grew by 11.2%.

    Mortgages increased by a modest 0.4% over the month, with more than 80% of new loans coming from mortgages with state support. The annual growth slowed to 13.4%, which is significantly lower than the 2023 level, when the market was overheated due to massive state support. At the same time, the volume of loans issued in 2024 was comparable to 2020 and 2022.

    The population’s funds in banks grew by a significant 7.2%, which is due to the traditional advance payment of January social payments (including pensions and child benefits) and the payment of annual bonuses. At the end of the year, the growth was 26.1%, including due to an increase in the population’s income and high interest rates on deposits.

    In December, banks’ net profit fell sharply to 187 billion rubles due to losses from currency revaluation and increased operating expenses. In 2024, the sector earned 3.8 trillion rubles (excluding receipts from subsidiary banks). The total financial result, taking into account the negative revaluation of securities reflected directly in capital, was lower and amounted to 3.4 trillion rubles.

    Read more in the information and analytical material “On the development of the banking sector of the Russian Federation in December 2024”.

    Preview photo: liliya Vantsura / Shutterstock / Fotodom

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //vv. KBR.ru/Press/Event/? ID = 23324

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: AFRICA/DR CONGO – “Foreigners leave Bukavu: fears of advance of the M23 rebel movement on the capital of South Kivu province”

    Source: Agenzia Fides – MIL OSI

    Thursday, 30 January 2025 war  

    Kinshasa (Agenzia Fides) – “In Bukavu, foreigners are fleeing,” missionaries from the capital of the Congolese province of South Kivu tell Fides. “The various embassies in Kinshasa have ordered their compatriots to leave the city because they fear that the M23 rebels could conquer it after taking control of Goma and the province of North Kivu,” the observers say. “Important departments of international organizations of the United Nations and various international non-governmental organizations are based in Bukavu. Now the foreign staff of these organizations are being evacuated via Rwanda.” “Currently, the rebel troops are already in Nyabibwe, in the Kalehe area of South Kivu,” the observers say. “It is a mountainous peak and if you go down to the south you are 25 km from the shores of Lake Kivu; from there you can easily reach Bukavu.” “The movements of the M23 units are facilitated by the means made available to them by the Rwandan army, which transported new off-road vehicles to Goma by barge, which were handed over to the rebels,” the observers added. Nyabibwe is home to a mine that extracts coltan and cassiterite, two of the strategic minerals that are the subject of the ongoing war involving local and regional actors backed by world powers and multinational mining companies.Meanwhile, the situation in Goma, which was captured by Rwandan troops and the M23 rebels they support, is stabilizing. The M23 rebels have organized the first patrols in the city to reassure the population and fight pockets of resistance from the Congolese army and the pro-government “Wazalendo” militiamen.”The rebels are trying to portray themselves as ‘liberators’ against what they call ‘the repressive regime in Kinshasa’: they are therefore trying to ensure a minimum of order and services for the population of the city they have conquered,” the observers report. As Corneille Nangaa, the leader of the Congo River Alliance, explained, the guerrillas’ goal is to march on the capital Kinshasa (about 1,600 km as the crow flies from Goma, but the road distance is more than 2,500 km) to overthrow President Félix Tshisekedi. “It seems like we have gone back about thirty years, when the guerrillas began their triumphal march at the end of 1996, which began in the east of the country and overthrew Mobutu in Kinshasa in the spring of 1997. But at that time the guerrillas, supported by Rwanda and Uganda, were also supported by other foreign powers. Now we must see what international interests are at work today,” commented the observers. To counter the rebels’ advance, President Tshisekedi has meanwhile ordered general mobilization and called on former soldiers and young people to join the army. (L.M.) (Agenzia Fides, 30/1/2025)
    Share:

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI: Easy Metrics Launches Profit Management Solution to Enhance 3PL Operating Margins up to 3%

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    BELLEVUE, Wash., Jan. 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Despite the third-party logistics (3PL) industry reaching $194B in revenue last year, 40% of 3PLs struggled to increase profits*. Easy Metrics addresses this profitability gap with Easy Metrics Profit Management, a new SaaS solution that provides real-time profitability insights by customer, process, and site. With instant access to profitability data, 3PLs can now optimize operating margins and boost their bottom line while eliminating weeks of manual reporting.

    “This real-time profitability data is a game-changer for 3PLs,” commented Dan Keto, President and CTO of Easy Metrics. “Knowing each customer’s operating margin enables 3PLs to price competitively, negotiate pricing based on objective data, and boost operating margins by up to 3%. For 3PLs with typical operating margins of 20-30%, that’s a significant impact because it goes straight to the bottom line.”

    Enhanced pricing transparency, supported by objective data, strengthens customer relationships for 3PLs. Since 3PL customers often value service over price, sharing operational data simplifies pricing discussions and builds trust. This transparency helps 3PLs retain key customers and attract new ones by showcasing their value. National Logistics Services, which piloted Easy Metrics Profit Management, demonstrated this impact. Val Ramoop, Vice President of Operations at NLS, said, “Ultimately, the data speaks for itself. If there are deviations, we can show our clients, ‘This is what’s driving your cost per unit.’”

    Multi-tenant 3PLs, especially those with multiple sites, gain the most from Easy Metrics’ Profit Management. The innovative technology delivers daily profit analysis for a 3PL’s entire network, breaking down costs by site, customer, process, or timeframe—monthly, weekly, or daily. This level of detail allows 3PLs to pinpoint unprofitable processes or activities for precise troubleshooting and improvement. “With significant bottom-line gains through better pricing and the ability to identify and address unprofitable activities, 3PLs using our solution will have a clear edge in today’s ultra-competitive environment,” stated Keto.

    Easy Metrics Profit Management integrates with Easy Metrics ProTrack™ or any Labor Management System (LMS) that allocates time spent on a process as employees perform work. For 3PLs without an LMS, Easy Metrics offers OpsFM™ alongside Profit Management, allowing them to get up and running quickly.

    “We founded Easy Metrics to help warehouse executives address cost challenges by providing data that empowers them to make daily business decisions. Profit Management builds on this vision by connecting activity-based costing to revenue, allowing executives to view their operational cost structure as a profit center and maximize daily value for customers and shareholders,” concluded Dean Dorcas, Co-Founder and CEO of Easy Metrics.

    *Source: https://www.inboundlogistics.com/articles/2024-perspectives-3pl-market-research-report/

    About Easy Metrics
    Operations and finance leaders use Easy Metrics’ cloud platform to analyze, forecast, and manage the cost and performance of their warehouse operations. Easy Metrics empowers leaders to drive operational speed and efficiency, cut waste, prioritize investments, and adopt labor and automation strategies that fuel their business growth. Easy Metrics is based in Bellevue, Washington and is backed by Nexa Equity, a private equity firm based in San Francisco, CA. For more information, please visit https://easymetrics.com.

    About Nexa Equity
    Nexa Equity is a San Francisco, California-based private equity firm that partners with founder-led, rapidly scaling SaaS companies that address markets underserved by technology to create enduring value for the benefit of its investors and portfolio companies. The firm has more than $350 million in private equity capital under management and is focused on continuing to grow its portfolio of companies. The Nexa Equity team brings substantial investing and operational experience and helps management teams professionalize and scale their businesses while driving long-term sustainable growth. For more information, please visit www.nexaequity.com.

    Contact:

    Easy Metrics
    Ronda Broughton
    650-400-8940
    ronda@easymetrics.com

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at: https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/395656b7-159e-4d2c-af6b-cd40faded991

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘All I wanted was to bid my daughter a final farewell’ – Gaza hostages, mainstream media and truth

    Palestinian politician, MP and activist Khalida Jarrar . . . AFTER being jailed by the Israeli military and released last Sunday as part of the ceasefire deal. Image: www.solidarity.co.nz

    COMMENTARY: By Eugene Doyle

    Watching footage of Palestinian parliamentarian and hostage Khalida Jarrar emerge from Israeli captivity was jarring — a far, muffled cry from the sense of happiness and relief most of us felt seeing the young female Israeli soldiers released by Hamas around the same time.

    What a study in contrast.

    Khalida was clearly emaciated, traumatised and had turned, in the same period of time, from a powerful dynamic woman into a fragile, elderly human being who moved with difficulty.

    What a difference it makes who holds you captive. It goes without saying I didn’t see this on any mainstream news outlet.

    In a previous period of imprisonment — for being a member of the PFLP, a proscribed organisation — the Israelis wouldn’t even allow Khalida Jarrar to attend the funeral of her own daughter.

    Instead she sent a message that was read at Suha’s funeral in 2021:

    I am in so much pain, my child, only because I miss you.
    I am in so much pain, my child, only because I miss you.

    From the depths of my agony, I reached out and
    embraced the sky of our homeland through the window
    of my prison cell in Damon Prison, Haifa.
    Worry not, my child.
    I stand tall, and steadfast, despite the shackles and the jailer.
    I am a mother in sorrow, from yearning to see you one last time.

    Suha, my precious.

    They have stripped me from bidding you a final goodbye kiss.
    I bid you farewell with a flower.
    Your absence is searingly painful, excruciatingly painful.
    But I remain steadfast and strong,
    Like the mountains of beloved Palestine.

    No mainstream coverage
    I searched online and found no mainstream outlet had covered Khalida’s release amid the flood of stories about the Israeli hostages. A search to see if Australian or New Zealand MPs had called for the release of their fellow legislator netted zero results.

    To them, she is no doubt a non-person. Yet, Khalida Jarrar is a leading political activist and one of dozens of legislators imprisoned by the Israelis. She endured. She remained steadfast.

    “The entire system of political imprisonment is based on suppressing Palestinian organising,” said Charlotte Kates, coordinator of Samidoun, the Palestinian Prisoner Support Network.

    The four female Israeli “Offence” Force (IDF) soldiers, according to all the many images and reports, were fit, happy and well-fed after their 15 months in Hamas captivity.

    The four female IDF soldiers, according to all the many images and reports, were fit, happy and well-fed after their 15 months in Hamas captivity. Images: Al Jazeera/www.solidarity.co.nz

    In contrast Palestinian prisoners typically had lost 16kg by the time they were freed. The Israelis with all the food and resources in the world made a policy — an actual policy — of mistreating prisoners, reducing food to a minimum, often beating them, finding perverse ways to humiliate them and on many occasions sexually assaulting men, women, boys and girls who had been dragged into their custody without charge.

    Many, an unknown number, died at their hands.

    Israeli Minister of National Security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, called months ago for legislation to allow the execution of Palestinian prisoners “with a shot in the head” and said he would provide minimal food to them until the law was enacted. I couldn’t find a single Western leader who called for him to be arrested.

    Israeli human rights report
    These crimes are filling compendia being compiled by the United Nations, the ICC and multiple organisations worldwide. You can read some of it here in an Israeli human rights report, “Welcome to Hell, the Israeli prison system as a network of torture camps”.

    Our media has a lot to answer for — for what was done to the thousands of Palestinian hostages because of its starring role in silencing Palestinian voices and hiding from view the realities of the Israeli prison system. Thousands were never charged with any crime — other than being Palestinian.

    Entire congregations in mosques, groups of people in refugee centres, were indiscriminately swept up and tossed into Israeli concentration camps.

    Were future historians to look back on these times and only have the mainstream media to go by, they would have lots of wonderful photos of the Israeli hostages, know them by name, see family hugs, biographical details, and listen to interviews with friends and relatives. In contrast, the Palestinians would turn towards History and we would see blank faces, erased of personality, all the detail of their stories rubbed out.

    That’s why it is imperative to find better sources of news and information, like Middle East Eye, Palestine Chronicle, Electronic Intifada and Pearls & Irritations, that can enrich our understanding of our times and the experience of the victims of Western genocidal violence.

    In his excellent article “The Other Hostages”, human rights lawyer Jonathan Kuttab says: “From the Palestinian perspective: there are about 13,000 Palestinian prisoners and detainees in Israeli jails who are just as worthy of our concern and also merit our sympathy, and whose families will rejoice at their long-awaited release.”

    Turning a blind eye to Israeli mistreatment of prisoners — and the mainstream media bias in favour of all things Israeli — goes back decades. But let’s look at the months since October 7th.

    No fact-checking
    All the mainstream media and servile politicians raced to report without fact-checking the lies the Israelis and Americans, including President Biden, told about beheaded babies and mass rapes. Few had the decency to walk back the calumnies even after official retractions and international investigations disproved them.

    In October 2023 I wrote one of my first stories post-October 7th on this very topic.

    Within a month of October 7, eight BBC journalists wrote to Al Jazeera saying “the corporation is failing to humanise Palestinians . . .  investing greater effort in humanising Israeli victims compared with Palestinians, and omitting key historical context in coverage.”

    CNN staff told British colleagues last year that their network’s pro-Israel slant amounts to “journalistic malpractice”.

    Hats off to Novara Media, one of the larger alternative news and analysis platforms for its exposure of bias. What they found was that Palestinians are “killed” whereas Israelis are “massacred” or “slaughtered”.

    Checking over 1000 articles by the UK’s supposedly progressive, left-leaning outlets — The Guardian, The Independent, Daily Mirror – Novara found that “all three publications favoured Israeli lives, narratives and voices.”

    Taking a list of emotive words they cross-checked and found that 77 percent were about violence against Israelis and only 23 percent about Palestinians. Well over 95 percent of victims of violence are Palestinians, 100 percent of land thefts are by Israelis. Facts matter.

    Journalism ‘used’ for racist war crimes
    This is journalism being used in the service of racist war crimes, used to normalise the mistreatment of prisoners and other Palestinian untermenschen.

    In the case of The Independent, it ran 70 stories on Israeli hostages (who at peak numbered about 250) and just one story on a Palestinian hostage (they number over 10,000).

    British journalist Owen Jones deserves a medal for reports like: “BBC in Civil War over Gaza.” The report details the efforts of journalists within the organisation to deliver more balanced coverage but the extent to which those efforts are thwarted by powerful pro-Israel operatives within the corporation who ensure “systematic pro-Israel propaganda at the corporation.”

    Palestinian lawmaker Khalida Jarrar (centre) with her daughter Suha. This story appeared in Electronic Intifada. Its author Ali Abunimah was arrested in Switzerland this week to prevent him giving a speech. Image: www.solidarity.co.nz

    “This unprecedented slaughter could not have happened without powerful cheerleaders,” Jones said in a recent piece about media co-conspirators with Israel in the genocide. “Hold them to account.”

    Damn right. I pray to whatever gods may be that justice will one day be served on all those who by their actions or by their “journalism” allowed these crimes to be committed.

    I’ll give the last word to Khalida Jarrar as I wish her a full and speedy recovery:

    “All I wanted was to bid my daughter a final farewell – with a kiss on her forehead and to tell her I love her as much as I love Palestine.”

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Marat Khusnullin: 1.8 million square meters of real estate have been commissioned under integrated territorial development projects

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Within the framework of integrated territorial development projects (ITD) in Russian regions, construction of residential complexes, social, transport and communal infrastructure facilities, as well as resettlement of dilapidated and hazardous housing stock continues.

    “Since 2021, when the KRT mechanism was launched, regions have had the opportunity to use it for the comprehensive development of their settlements. Since then, more and more entities have joined this work. New residential complexes and various infrastructure facilities are being built, which in turn has a positive effect on the quality of life and comfort for people. In general, more than 1.8 million square meters of real estate have been commissioned under integrated territorial development projects to date, of which about 1.6 million square meters is residential space. In total, 866 integrated territorial development projects with an area of 19.6 thousand hectares are under implementation in 77 regions across the country,” said Marat Khusnullin.

    The Deputy Prime Minister noted that the total urban development potential of KRT projects under implementation amounts to 139.7 million square meters of real estate, of which 101.9 million square meters are residential areas.

    In total, the regions adopted 720 decisions on integrated development of territories, of which 217 relate to 2024. Also, 790 trade procedures were carried out and 737 contracts on integrated development of territories were concluded. In addition, 321 sets of planning documents were developed and approved for territories with an urban development potential of 36.6 million sq. m.

    “The selection of new territories for integrated development is also continuing throughout the country. Today, 1,429 territories with a total area of 35.7 thousand hectares are being developed. The urban development potential of these sites reaches 252.3 million square meters, of which 182.6 million square meters are housing,” said First Deputy Minister of Construction and Housing and Public Utilities Alexander Lomakin.

    The resettlement of dilapidated and emergency housing is also one of the priorities for the application of the KRT in the regions.

    “Currently, the resettlement of dilapidated and emergency housing under the KRT projects is being carried out in 32 regions. As of today, 228.25 thousand square meters of housing have been resettled, including 195.49 thousand square meters of emergency housing. More than 13 thousand people were able to improve their living conditions. This work will continue in 2025,” noted Ilshat Shagiakhmetov, CEO of the Territorial Development Fund.

    Integrated development of territories also covers land plots that belong to the Russian Federation. The Government Commission for the Development of Housing Construction and Evaluation of the Efficiency of Using Land Plots Owned by the Russian Federation has made positive decisions on 78 such KRT projects in 38 regions with a total urban development potential of 17 million sq. m.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI: YieldMax™ Launches Option Income Strategy ETF on CARVANA CO. (CVNA)

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO and MILWAUKEE and NEW YORK, Jan. 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — YieldMax™ announced the launch today of the following ETF:

    YieldMax™ CARVANA Option Income Strategy ETF (NYSE Arca: CVNY)

    CVNY seeks to generate current income by pursuing options-based strategies on CARVANA CO. (CVNA). CVNY is actively managed by Tidal Financial Group. CNVY does not invest directly in CVNA.

    CVNY is the newest member of the YieldMax™ ETF family and like all YieldMax™ ETFs, aims to deliver current income to investors. With respect to distributions, CVNY will be a Group C ETF and its first distribution is expected to be announced on March 5, 2025. Please see table below for distribution information for all outstanding YieldMax™ ETFs as of January 29, 2025.

    ETF Ticker1 ETF Name Reference Asset Distribution per Share2
    TSLY YieldMax™ TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF TSLA $ 0.7170
    OARK YieldMax™ Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF ARKK $ 0.3298
    APLY YieldMax™ AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF AAPL $ 0.2841
    NVDY YieldMax™ NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF NVDA $ 0.8294
    AMZY YieldMax™ AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF AMZN $ 0.4005
    FBY YieldMax™ META Option Income Strategy ETF META $ 0.6390
    GOOY YieldMax™ GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF GOOGL $ 0.3324
    NFLY YieldMax™ NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF NFLX $ 0.5830
    CONY YieldMax™ COIN Option Income Strategy ETF COIN $ 0.8339
    MSFO YieldMax™ MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF MSFT $ 0.3667
    DISO YieldMax™ DIS Option Income Strategy ETF DIS $ 0.2782
    XOMO YieldMax™ XOM Option Income Strategy ETF XOM $ 0.3485
    JPMO YieldMax™ JPM Option Income Strategy ETF JPM $ 0.6929
    AMDY YieldMax™ AMD Option Income Strategy ETF AMD $ 0.3404
    PYPY YieldMax™ PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF PYPL $ 0.4264
    SQY YieldMax™ SQ Option Income Strategy ETF SQ $ 0.6338
    MRNY YieldMax™ MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF MRNA $ 0.2730
    AIYY YieldMax™ AI Option Income Strategy ETF AI $ 0.3763
    YMAX YieldMax™ Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs Multiple $ 0.1469
    YMAG YieldMax™ Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Multiple $ 0.1898
    MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF MSTR $ 2.2792
    ULTY YieldMax™ Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF Multiple $ 0.5715
    YBIT YieldMax™ Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF Bitcoin ETP $ 0.7893
    CRSH YieldMax™ Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF TSLA $ 0.2862
    GDXY YieldMax™ Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF GDX® $ 0.5937
    SNOY YieldMax™ SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF SNOW $ 0.7392
    ABNY YieldMax™ ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF ABNB $ 0.4220
    FIAT YieldMax™ Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF COIN $ 0.6530
    DIPS YieldMax™ Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF NVDA $ 0.5026
    BABO YieldMax™ BABA Option Income Strategy ETF BABA $ 0.4693
    YQQQ YieldMax™ Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF N100 $ 0.3873
    TSMY YieldMax™ TSM Option Income Strategy ETF TSM $ 0.6449
    SMCY YieldMax™ SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF SMCI $ 1.7215
    PLTY YieldMax™ PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF PLTR $ 2.9826
    BIGY YieldMax™ Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF Multiple $ 0.5130
    SOXY YieldMax™ Target 12™ Semiconductor Option Income ETF Multiple $ 0.5256
    MARO YieldMax™ MARA Option Income Strategy ETF MARA $ 2.1002
    FEAT YieldMax™ Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF Multiple $ 2.1944
    FIVY YieldMax™ Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF Multiple $ 1.6771
    LFGY YieldMax™ Crypto Industry & Tech Option Income ETF Multiple $ 0.6294
    GPTY* YieldMax™ AI & Tech Option Income ETF Multiple  

    Note: DIPS, FIAT, CRSH and YQQQ are hereinafter referred to as the “Short ETFs” and “ADR” stands for American Depositary Receipt.

    You are not guaranteed a distribution under the ETFs. Distributions for the ETFs (if any) are variable and may vary significantly from period to period and may be zero.

    Investors in the Funds will not have rights to receive dividends or other distributions with respect to the underlying reference asset(s).

    *The inception date for GPTY is January 22, 2025.

    1Each ETF’s strategy (except those of the Short ETFs) will cap potential gains if its reference asset’s shares increase in value, yet subjects an investor to all potential losses if the reference asset’s shares decrease in value. Such potential losses may not be offset by income received by the ETF. Each Short ETF’s strategy will cap potential gains if its reference asset decreases in value, yet subjects an investor to all potential losses if the reference asset increases in value. Such potential losses may not be offset by income received by the ETF.

    2 The Distribution per Share is the most recently declared such amount as of close on January 29, 2025.

    Each Fund has a limited operating history and while each Fund’s objective is to provide current income, there is no guarantee the Fund will make a distribution. Distributions are likely to vary greatly in amount.

    Important Information

    Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. For a prospectus or summary prospectus with this and other information about each Fund, visit our website at www.YieldMaxETFs.com. Read the prospectus or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

    There is no guarantee that any Fund’s investment strategy will be properly implemented, and an investor may lose some or all of its investment in any such Fund.

    Tidal Financial Group is the adviser for all YieldMax™ ETFs.

    THE FUND, TRUST, AND ADVISER ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY UNDERLYING REFERENCE ASSET.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable to all YieldMax ETFs referenced above, except the Short ETFs)

    YMAX, YMAG, FEAT and FIVY generally invest in other YieldMax™ ETFs. As such, these two Funds are subject to the risks listed in this section, which apply to all the YieldMax™ ETFs they may hold from time to time.

    Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.

    Call Writing Strategy Risk. The path dependency (i.e., the continued use) of the Fund’s call writing strategy will impact the extent that the Fund participates in the positive price returns of the underlying reference asset and, in turn, the Fund’s returns, both during the term of the sold call options and over longer time periods.

    Counterparty Risk. The Fund is subject to counterparty risk by virtue of its investments in options contracts. Transactions in some types of derivatives, including options, are required to be centrally cleared (“cleared derivatives”). In a transaction involving cleared derivatives, the Fund’s counterparty is a clearing house rather than a bank or broker. Since the Fund is not a member of clearing houses and only members of a clearing house (“clearing members”) can participate directly in the clearing house, the Fund will hold cleared derivatives through accounts at clearing members.

    Derivatives Risk. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, or funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. The Fund’s investments in derivatives may pose risks in addition to, and greater than, those associated with directly investing in securities or other ordinary investments, including risk related to the market, imperfect correlation with underlying investments or the Fund’s other portfolio holdings, higher price volatility, lack of availability, counterparty risk, liquidity, valuation and legal restrictions.

    Options Contracts. The use of options contracts involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The prices of options are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in the value of the underlying instrument, including the anticipated volatility, which are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political, changes in the actual or implied volatility or the reference asset, the time remaining until the expiration of the option contract and economic events.

    Distribution Risk. As part of the Fund’s investment objective, the Fund seeks to provide current income. There is no assurance that the Fund will make a distribution in any given month. If the Fund does make distributions, the amounts of such distributions will likely vary greatly from one distribution to the next.

    High Portfolio Turnover Risk. The Fund may actively and frequently trade all or a significant portion of the Fund’s holdings. A high portfolio turnover rate increases transaction costs, which may increase the Fund’s expenses.

    Liquidity Risk. Some securities held by the Fund, including options contracts, may be difficult to sell or be illiquid, particularly during times of market turmoil.

    Non-Diversification Risk. Because the Fund is “non-diversified,” it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund.

    New Fund Risk. The Fund is a recently organized management investment company with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors do not have a track record or history on which to base their investment decisions.

    Price Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of call option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will participate in increases in value experienced by the underlying reference asset over the Call Period.

    Single Issuer Risk. Issuer-specific attributes may cause an investment in the Fund to be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment which diversifies risk or the market generally. The value of the Fund, which focuses on an individual security (ARKK, TSLA, AAPL, NVDA, AMZN, META, GOOGL, NFLX, COIN, MSFT, DIS, XOM, JPM, AMD, PYPL, SQ, MRNA, AI, MSTR, Bitcoin ETP, GDX®, SNOW, ABNB, BABA, TSM, SMCI, PLTR, MARA, CVNA), may be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole and may perform differently from the value of a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole.

    Inflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the present value of the Fund’s assets and distributions, if any, may decline.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to GPTY)

    Artificial Intelligence Risk. Issuers engaged in artificial intelligence typically have high research and capital expenditures and, as a result, their profitability can vary widely, if they are profitable at all. The space in which they are engaged is highly competitive and issuers’ products and services may become obsolete very quickly. These companies are heavily dependent on intellectual property rights and may be adversely affected by loss or impairment of those rights. The issuers are also subject to legal, regulatory and political changes that may have a large impact on their profitability. A failure in an issuer’s product or even questions about the safety of the product could be devastating to the issuer, especially if it is the marquee product of the issuer. It can be difficult to accurately capture what qualifies as an artificial intelligence company.

    Technology Sector Risk. The Fund will invest substantially in companies in the information technology sector, and therefore the performance of the Fund could be negatively impacted by events affecting this sector. Market or economic factors impacting technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technological advances could have a significant effect on the value of the Fund’s investments. The value of stocks of information technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technology is particularly vulnerable to rapid changes in technology product cycles, rapid product obsolescence, government regulation and competition, both domestically and internationally, including competition from foreign competitors with lower production costs. Stocks of information technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technology, especially those of smaller, less-seasoned companies, tend to be more volatile than the overall market. Information technology companies are heavily dependent on patent and intellectual property rights, the loss or impairment of which may adversely affect profitability.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to MARO)

    Digital Assets Risk: The Fund does not invest directly in Bitcoin or any other digital assets. The Fund does not invest directly in derivatives that track the performance of Bitcoin or any other digital assets. The Fund does not invest in or seek direct exposure to the current “spot” or cash price of Bitcoin. Investors seeking direct exposure to the price of Bitcoin should consider an investment other than the Fund. Digital assets like Bitcoin, designed as mediums of exchange, are still an emerging asset class. They operate independently of any central authority or government backing and are subject to regulatory changes and extreme price volatility.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to BABO and TSMY)

    Currency Risk: Indirect exposure to foreign currencies subjects the Fund to the risk that currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. dollar. Currency rates in foreign countries may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time for a number of reasons, including changes in interest rates and the imposition of currency controls or other political developments in the U.S. or abroad.

    Depositary Receipts Risk: Investment in ADRs may be less liquid than the underlying shares in their primary trading market.

    Foreign Market and Trading Risk: The trading markets for many foreign securities are not as active as U.S. markets and may have less governmental regulation and oversight.

    Foreign Securities Risk: Investments in securities of non-U.S. issuers involve certain risks that may not be present with investments in securities of U.S. issuers, such as risk of loss due to foreign currency fluctuations or to political or economic instability, as well as varying regulatory requirements applicable to investments in non-U.S. issuers. There may be less information publicly available about a non-U.S. issuer than a U.S. issuer. Non-U.S. issuers may also be subject to different regulatory, accounting, auditing, financial reporting and investor protection standards than U.S. issuers.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to GDXY)

    Risk of Investing in Foreign Securities. The Fund is exposed indirectly to the securities of foreign issuers selected by GDX®’s investment adviser, which subjects the Fund to the risks associated with such companies. Investments in the securities of foreign issuers involve risks beyond those associated with investments in U.S. securities.

    Risk of Investing in Gold and Silver Mining Companies. The Fund is exposed indirectly to gold and silver mining companies selected by GDX®’s investment adviser, which subjects the Fund to the risks associated with such companies.

    The Fund invests in options contracts based on the value of the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX®), which subjects the Fund to some of the same risks as if it owned GDX®, as well as the risks associated with Canadian, Australian and Emerging Market Issuers, and Small-and Medium-Capitalization companies.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to YBIT)

    YBIT does not invest directly in Bitcoin or any other digital assets. YBIT does not invest directly in derivatives that track the performance of Bitcoin or any other digital assets. YBIT does not invest in or seek direct exposure to the current “spot” or cash price of Bitcoin. Investors seeking direct exposure to the price of Bitcoin should consider an investment other than YBIT.

    Bitcoin Investment Risk: The Fund’s indirect investment in Bitcoin, through holdings in one or more Underlying ETPs, exposes it to the unique risks of this emerging innovation. Bitcoin’s price is highly volatile, and its market is influenced by the changing Bitcoin network, fluctuating acceptance levels, and unpredictable usage trends.

    Digital Assets Risk: Digital assets like Bitcoin, designed as mediums of exchange, are still an emerging asset class. They operate independently of any central authority or government backing and are subject to regulatory changes and extreme price volatility. Potentially No 1940 Act Protections. As of the date of this Prospectus, there is only a single eligible Underlying ETP, and it is an investment company subject to the 1940 Act.

    Bitcoin ETP Risk: The Fund invests in options contracts that are based on the value of the Bitcoin ETP. This subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it owned shares of the Bitcoin ETP, even though it does not. Bitcoin ETPs are subject, but not limited, to significant risk and heightened volatility. An investor in a Bitcoin ETP may lose their entire investment. Bitcoin ETPs are not suitable for all investors. In addition, not all Bitcoin ETPs are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Those Bitcoin ETPs that are not registered under such statute are therefore not subject to the same regulations as exchange traded products that are so registered.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to the Short ETFs)

    Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.

    Price Appreciation Risk. As part of the Fund’s synthetic covered put strategy, the Fund purchases and sells call and put option contracts that are based on the value of the underlying reference asset. This strategy subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it shorted the underlying reference asset, even though it does not. By virtue of the Fund’s indirect inverse exposure to changes in the value of the underlying reference asset, the Fund is subject to the risk that the value of the underlying reference asset increases. If the value of the underlying reference asset increases, the Fund will likely lose value and, as a result, the Fund may suffer significant losses.

    Put Writing Strategy Risk. The path dependency (i.e., the continued use) of the Fund’s put writing (selling) strategy will impact the extent that the Fund participates in decreases in the value of the underlying reference asset and, in turn, the Fund’s returns, both during the term of the sold put options and over longer time periods.

    Purchased OTM Call Options Risk. The Fund’s strategy is subject to potential losses if the underlying reference asset increases in value, which may not be offset by the purchase of out-of-the-money (OTM) call options. The Fund purchases OTM calls to seek to manage (cap) the Fund’s potential losses from the Fund’s short exposure to the underlying reference asset if it appreciates significantly in value. However, the OTM call options will cap the Fund’s losses only to the extent that the value of the underlying reference asset increases to a level that is at or above the strike level of the purchased OTM call options. Any increase in the value of the underlying reference asset to a level that is below the strike level of the purchased OTM call options will result in a corresponding loss for the Fund. For example, if the OTM call options have a strike level that is approximately 100% above the then-current value of the underlying reference asset at the time of the call option purchase, and the value of the underlying reference asset increases by at least 100% during the term of the purchased OTM call options, the Fund will lose all its value. Since the Fund bears the costs of purchasing the OTM calls, such costs will decrease the Fund’s value and/or any income otherwise generated by the Fund’s investment strategy.

    Counterparty Risk. The Fund is subject to counterparty risk by virtue of its investments in options contracts. Transactions in some types of derivatives, including options, are required to be centrally cleared (“cleared derivatives”). In a transaction involving cleared derivatives, the Fund’s counterparty is a clearing house rather than a bank or broker. Since the Fund is not a member of clearing houses and only members of a clearing house (“clearing members”) can participate directly in the clearing house, the Fund will hold cleared derivatives through accounts at clearing members.

    Derivatives Risk. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, or funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. The Fund’s investments in derivatives may pose risks in addition to, and greater than, those associated with directly investing in securities or other ordinary investments, including risk related to the market, imperfect correlation with underlying investments or the Fund’s other portfolio holdings, higher price volatility, lack of availability, counterparty risk, liquidity, valuation and legal restrictions.

    Options Contracts. The use of options contracts involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The prices of options are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in the value of the underlying reference asset, including the anticipated volatility, which are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political, changes in the actual or implied volatility or the reference asset, the time remaining until the expiration of the option contract and economic events.

    Distribution Risk. As part of the Fund’s investment objective, the Fund seeks to provide current income. There is no assurance that the Fund will make a distribution in any given month. If the Fund does make distributions, the amounts of such distributions will likely vary greatly from one distribution to the next.

    High Portfolio Turnover Risk. The Fund may actively and frequently trade all or a significant portion of the Fund’s holdings.

    Liquidity Risk. Some securities held by the Fund, including options contracts, may be difficult to sell or be illiquid, particularly during times of market turmoil.

    Non-Diversification Risk. Because the Fund is “non-diversified,” it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund.

    New Fund Risk. The Fund is a recently organized management investment company with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors do not have a track record or history on which to base their investment decisions.

    Price Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of put option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will participate in decreases in value experienced by the underlying reference asset over the Put Period.

    Single Issuer Risk. Issuer-specific attributes may cause an investment in the Fund to be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment which diversifies risk or the market generally. The value of the Fund, for any Fund that focuses on an individual security (e.g., TSLA, COIN, NVDA), may be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole and may perform differently from the value of a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole.

    Inflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the present value of the Fund’s assets and distributions, if any, may decline.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to YQQQ)

    Index Overview. The Nasdaq 100 Index is a benchmark index that includes 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market, based on market capitalization.

    Index Level Appreciation Risk. As part of the Fund’s synthetic covered put strategy, the Fund purchases and sells call and put option contracts that are based on the Index level. This strategy subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it shorted the Index, even though it does not. By virtue of the Fund’s indirect inverse exposure to changes in the Index level, the Fund is subject to the risk that the Index level increases. If the Index level increases, the Fund will likely lose value and, as a result, the Fund may suffer significant losses. The Fund may also be subject to the following risks: innovation and technological advancement; strong market presence of Index constituent companies; adaptability to global market trends; and resilience and recovery potential.

    Index Level Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of put option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will benefit from decreases in the Index level experienced over the Put Period. This means that if the Index level experiences a decrease in value below the strike level of the sold put options during a Put Period, the Fund will likely not experience that increase to the same extent and any Fund gains may significantly differ from the level of the Index losses over the Put Period. Additionally, because the Fund is limited in the degree to which it will participate in decreases in value experienced by the Index level over each Put Period, but has significant negative exposure to any increases in value experienced by the Index level over the Put Period, the NAV of the Fund may decrease over any given time period. The Fund’s NAV is dependent on the value of each options portfolio, which is based principally upon the inverse of the performance of the Index level. The Fund’s ability to benefit from the Index level decreases will depend on prevailing market conditions, especially market volatility, at the time the Fund enters into the sold put option contracts and will vary from Put Period to Put Period. The value of the options contracts is affected by changes in the value and dividend rates of component companies that comprise the Index, changes in interest rates, changes in the actual or perceived volatility of the Index and the remaining time to the options’ expiration, as well as trading conditions in the options market. As the Index level changes and time moves towards the expiration of each Put Period, the value of the options contracts, and therefore the Fund’s NAV, will change. However, it is not expected for the Fund’s NAV to directly inversely correlate on a day-to-day basis with the returns of the Index level. The amount of time remaining until the options contract’s expiration date affects the impact that the value of the options contracts has on the Fund’s NAV, which may not be in full effect until the expiration date of the Fund’s options contracts. Therefore, while changes in the Index level will result in changes to the Fund’s NAV, the Fund generally anticipates that the rate of change in the Fund’s NAV will be different than the inverse of the changes experienced by the Index level.

    Holdings

    As of January 29, 2025, the YieldMax™ CARVANA Option Income Strategy ETF did not hold any shares of CARVANA CO. (CVNA). As of such date, the holdings of CVNA in such fund were 0.00%.

    YieldMax™ ETFs are distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC. Foreside is not affiliated with Tidal Financial Group, YieldMax™ ETFs.

    © 2025 YieldMax™ ETFs

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Video: UK Baroness Hazarika on tackling shoplifting and antisocial behaviour | Lord Speaker’s Corner

    Source: United Kingdom UK House of Lords (video statements)

    ‘Where I live there is so much shoplifting going on.’
    Broadcast Ayesha Hazarika – Baroness Hazarika – is the latest guest on Lord Speaker’s Corner. She talks to the Lord Speaker about why she is using her new role to campaign for more to be done to tackle shoplifting and antisocial behaviour.

    Find out more, listen now wherever you get your podcasts or search ‘House of Lords’ on YouTube: https://www.parliament.uk/business/lords/house-of-lords-podcast/baroness-hazarika-lord-speakers-corner/

    #LordSpeakersCorner #HouseOfLords #LordsMembers

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wql65I9_g0

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Repatriation of Syrians – E-000218/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-000218/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Emmanouil Fragkos (ECR), Galato Alexandraki (ECR)

    It was believed that the Assad Government was the reason why many Syrians fled to the EU. Between 2015 and 2023, around 1.3 million Syrians are estimated to have been accepted into the EU after seeking a safe home/asylum as ‘Syrian refugees’. Following recent attacks by the jihadist organisations Hayat Tahrir al-Sham and the Syrian National Army, a large part of Syria was captured, resulting in the collapse of Bashar al-Assad’s government. The end of al-Assad’s rule was celebrated by Syrians all across Europe.

    Given that their reason for seeking asylum has ceased to exist, there is no reason why procedures for returning Syrians to Syria should not be initiated right away, so that they can benefit from the implementation of a jihadist regime.

    In view of the above, can the Commission say:

    • 1.Does it have a registry of Syrians in Europe or does it intend to request this data from the Member States and NGOs that have been the driving force behind their movement and that have provided them with asylum?
    • 2.How does it intend to coordinate mass returns from the EU and transport to Syria safely, quickly and efficiently, guaranteeing that former ‘refugees’ from Syria will not be forgotten in the EU?
    • 3.Will it propose sanctions for NGOs that do not cooperate with identifying Syrians to enable their effective repatriation?

    Submitted: 20.1.2025

    Last updated: 30 January 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EIB Group increases investment in Austria for growth, innovation and climate action by nearly a third

    Source: European Investment Bank

    • In 2024, the EIB Group reached a funding volume of €1.7 billion in Austria
    • Focus on countercyclical investment promotion in energy-intensive industries such as steel production
    • The expansion of renewable energies remains a priority goal

    The European Investment Bank Group (EIB Group) can look back on a successful year 2024 in Austria.  With a total lending volume of nearly €1.7 billion, it granted around 30% more loans than in the previous year. Funding applications were submitted to the EIB by public and private sector firms, primarily for energy projects that reduce CO2 emissions and promote the transition to renewable energy.

    2024 brought a rise in the construction of solar plants and wind farms in Austria – supported by the national government, which has set the objective of generating all of the country’s electricity from renewable sources by 2030. As in the two previous years, in 2024 the EIB exceeded its goal of allocating at least 50% of funding to climate action. In Austria, 64% of total investment went to climate.

    The EIB co-finances wind and solar projects together with partner banks. In Burgenland, it is providing €80 million to fund six solar parks by Püspök. They will supply 71 000 households with electricity, and the farmland they will be built on can continue to be used to grow crops.

    Burgenland Energie AG will also receive EIB financing of up to €620 million to build solar and wind parks. With a generation capacity of 1.3 GW once complete, they will be able to meet one-sixth of Austria’s electricity needs. The EU bank is also co-financing the Spannberg wind park in Lower Austria, with four wind turbines and a further seven in the planning phase.

    The EIB Group, consisting of the European Investment Bank (EIB) and the European Investment Fund (EIF), seeks to be a reliable partner in making European industry more competitive – especially in difficult economic times, by promoting countercyclical investment. In the steel and construction industries, the EIB Group finances projects in Austria that support their green transition: for example, with a €300 million grant issued to Voestalpine for research and development.

    “The EIB is a strong partner for Austria’s future,” EIB Vice-President Thomas Östros stated. “Our investments make it easier for firms to expand and become more innovative, to use renewable energy and to cut energy consumption. We invest countercyclically and promote the long-term competitiveness of Austrian industry. We will continue to support the development of wind, solar and hydro power plants.”

    To increase the housing supply, the EIB is continuing to back affordable housing projects. In Salzburg and Tyrol, it is working with regional savings banks to finance the construction of 1 750 rental units in non-profit housing with low-cost framework loans.

    As in previous years, the EIF – whose shareholders include the EIB, the European Commission and several national and regional promotional banks – continued to support specialised funds targeting startups and innovative technologies, investing €66 million in Austria.

    In 2024, in view of the EIB Group’s policy priorities, projects in Austria in the field of sustainable energy and natural resources received the most support, with €765 million, followed by innovation, digital and human capital, with €462 million. Sustainable cities and regions received €329 million, and SMEs and mid-caps received €112 million.

    EIB Group investment in Austria in 2024 supported investment of in total €4.3 billion. Thus, each euro of EIB Group financing raised investment of around €2.60.

    Background information

    EIB 

    The European Investment Bank (ElB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. It finances investments that contribute to EU policy objectives by bolstering digitalisation and technological innovation, security and defence, agriculture and bioeconomy, social infrastructure, high-impact investments outside the EU, and the Capital Markets Union.  

    The EIB Group, which also includes the European Investment Fund (EIF), signed nearly €89 billion in new financing for over 900 projects in 2024. These commitments are expected to mobilise around €350 billion in investment, supporting 400 000 companies and 5.8 million jobs.  

    All projects financed by the EIB Group are in line with the Paris Climate Accord and the EIB Group does not fund investments in fossil fuels. We are on track to deliver on our commitment to support  €1 trillion in climate and environmental sustainability investment in the decade to 2030 as pledged in our Climate Bank Roadmap. Almost 60% of the EIB Group’s annual financing supports projects directly contributing to climate change mitigation, adaptation, and a healthier environment. 

    Approximately half of the EIB’s financing within the European Union is directed towards cohesion regions, where per capita income is lower than the EU average. This underscores the Bank’s commitment to fostering inclusive growth and the convergence of living standards. 

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EIB Group financing in Slovenia totals €284 million in 2024, driving the energy transition and business innovation

    Source: European Investment Bank

    • EIB Group provided €284 million of new financing in Slovenia last year, boosting the energy transition, business innovation and capital markets.
    • Funding of €154 million from EIB and €130 million from EIF in the country in 2024.
    • Investments strengthened Slovenia’s electricity grid, early-stage companies and venture-capital markets.

    The European Investment Bank (EIB) Group  provided €284 million of fresh financing in Slovenia last year, bolstering the energy transition, business innovation and capital markets in the country. The total for 2024 includes €154 million from the EIB and €130 million from the European Investment Fund (EIF), which targets micro companies and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Europe.

    EIB financing in Slovenia last year focused on energy projects, fostering sustainable energy and energy efficiency, while the EIF investments supported venture capital and private equity to boost entrepreneurship and innovation.

    “We are committed to fostering a sustainable, innovative and inclusive Slovenian economy,” said EIB Vice-President Kyriacos Kakouris. “Our investments in Slovenia last year not only strengthen the country’s energy resilience and competitiveness but also ensure that businesses and communities can thrive in a rapidly changing environment.”

    Over the past five years, the EIB Group has invested over €1 billion in Slovenia, focusing on sustainable transport, energy infrastructure and capital markets. Its financing of local electricity distribution covers four out of five distribution companies, which supply around nine out of 10 Slovenian households.

    Grid upgrades and business innovation

    The EIB last year signed agreements with three power companies to upgrade Slovenia’s electricity grids. It committed €36 million to Elektro Maribor, €50 million to Elektro Ljubljana and €58 million to Elektro Celje.

    These loans will reinforce regional energy infrastructure, enabling the integration of renewable energy, expanding capacity for electric vehicle charging and climate-proofing critical systems. The projects align with Slovenia’s 2050 climate targets and the European Union’s REPowerEU strategy.

    Additionally, the EIB provided advisory services to municipalities, public institutions and private companies to ensure comprehensive support for sustainable growth across Slovenia.

    For its part, the EIF pressed ahead in 2024 with its long-standing support for Slovenian SMEs and Mid-Caps, focusing on innovation and early-stage businesses. A highlight last year was a €40 million EIF pledge to the Vesna Deep Tech Venture Fund to build up technology transfer in Slovenia as well as Croatia. The fund prioritises early-stage businesses, fosters innovation and protects intellectual property, strengthening Slovenia’s venture-capital ecosystem.

    Since 1996, the EIF has facilitated €531 million in financing for approximately 8,000 Slovenian enterprises, supporting 78,000 jobs.

    Background information

    The European Investment Bank (EIB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union owned by its Member States. It finances sound investment that contributes towards EU policy goals, including social and territorial cohesion, competitiveness, innovation, sustainable development and the just, swift transition to net zero. The EIB has committed €7.78 billion in total financing for projects in Slovenia since the start of its operations in the country.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Lithuania financing from EIB Group totals €449 million in 2024, boosting business and green investments

    Source: European Investment Bank

    • EIB Group financing in Lithuania last year totalled €449 million, bolstering business and green investments nationwide.
    • Funding supported 1,200 Lithuanian companies and sustained 19,000 jobs.
    • Energy storage and clean railways among key 2024 projects.

    The European Investment Bank (EIB) Group’s financing in Lithuania last year amounted to €449 million, spurring business investments and accelerating the country’s green transition. The total for 2024 includes €240 million from the EIB and €209 million from the European Investment Fund (EIF), which targets small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

    The EIB Group pledges last year in Lithuania supported 1,200 SMEs and Mid-Caps, sustained 19,000 jobs and covered 21 investment projects across the country.  Top operations included EIB loans of €105 million to Lithuanian utility Ignitis Group for expanding a pumped storage hydroelectric power plant and €100 million to national railway service LTG Link for buying electric and battery trains.

    “Lithuania’s commitment to sustainability is inspiring,” said EIB Vice-President Thomas Östros. “Our investments in the country in 2024 underscore our dedication to supporting Lithuania’s green transition and economic resilience. We are helping to build a sustainable future for all Lithuanians.”

    The level of EIB Group financing in Lithuania in 2024 was broadly in line with the organisation’s average annual commitments of €562 million in the country over the past five years. For example, EIB Group financing in Lithuania totalled €654 million in 2023 and €219 million in 2022. 

    Energy and transport projects

    The €105 million EIB loan last year to Ignitis Group is for expanding the Kruonis Pumped Storage Hydroelectric Power Plant and making it one of Europe’s largest energy-storage facilities. The goal is to increase Lithuania’s energy independence and help the country achieve 100% renewable electricity by 2030.

    The €100 million EIB loan to LTG Link is for replacing a third of the company’s train fleet. The aim is to reduce carbon-dioxide emissions from trains, shorten rail-travel times and improve passenger accessibility.

    Also in the area of energy, the EIB last year signed a €35 million loan to district utility Kauno Energija for upgrading the heating and hot water system of the city of Kaunas by refurbishing pipelines, adding heat storage tanks and integrating renewable sources. This project will boost energy efficiency, diversify the energy mix and reduce reliance on imported natural gas, benefiting around 400,000 residents and businesses.

    Supporting small companies

    The EIF’s pledges in Lithuania last year included nearly €129 million to businesses through deals with various banks and financial institutions including AB Mano Bankas, AB SEB Bankas, Swedbank Bank Lithuania, UAB SME Bank, Lithuanian Central Credit Union, Taurus Fondas UAB and UAB Heavy Finance.

    These agreements unlock loans to Lithuanian SMEs at preferential terms to support growth, create jobs and speed up the transition to a carbon-neutral economy.

    In 2024, the EIF also invested €50 million in IAM CEE Student Housing Fund, an infrastructure fund committed to building housing for up to 3,500 students in Central-Eastern European countries including Lithuania, and €30 million in INVL Private Equity Fund II, a private equity fund dedicated to boosting investments in high-growth SMEs mainly in Lithuania.

    Background information     

    EIB

    The European Investment Bank (ElB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. It finances investments that contribute to EU policy objectives. EIB projects bolster competitiveness, drive innovation, promote sustainable development, enhance social and territorial cohesion, and support a just and swift transition to climate neutrality.  

    The EIB Group, which also includes the European Investment Fund (EIF), signed a total of €88 billion in new financing for over 900 projects in 2023. These commitments are expected to mobilise around €320 billion in investment, supporting 400 000 companies and 5.4 million jobs.  

    All projects financed by the EIB Group are in line with the Paris Climate Accord. The EIB Group does not fund investments in fossil fuels. We are on track to deliver on our commitment to support  €1 trillion in climate and environmental sustainability investment in the decade to 2030 as pledged in our Climate Bank Roadmap. Over half of the EIB Group’s annual financing supports projects directly contributing to climate change mitigation, adaptation, and a healthier environment.  

    Approximately half of the EIB’s financing within the European Union is directed towards cohesion regions, where per capita income is lower. This underscores the Bank’s commitment to fostering inclusive growth and the convergence of living standards. 

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Finland financing from EIB Group more than doubles in 2024 to €2.3 billion

    Source: European Investment Bank

    • EIB Group investments in Finland rose to €2.3 billion in 2024 from €992 million the year before.
    • Financing boost of 132% supported 1,800 Finnish SMEs and Mid-Caps and sustained 40,000 jobs in the country.
    • Most funding went to green projects and business innovation.

    The European Investment Bank (EIB) Group’s financing in Finland more than doubled to €2.3 billion in 2024, with the bulk of funds aimed at accelerating the green transition and business innovation in the country. The EIB Group’s pledges last year represent a 132% increase from €992 million in 2023.

    The financing in Finland last year included €1.7 billion from the EIB and €606 million from the European Investment Fund (EIF) arm, which focuses on supporting Europe’s micro companies and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

    The EIB Group’s funding in Finland in 2024 supported 1,800 SMEs and Mid-Caps, sustained 40,000 jobs and covered 21 investment initiatives across the country. The amount is expected to trigger €5.1 billion of total investment, equivalent to 1.9% of Finnish gross domestic product (GDP).

    “Our significant investments in 2024 underscore our unwavering commitment to Finland’s economic growth and resilience,” said EIB Vice-President Thomas Östros. “By financing a diverse array of projects from cutting-edge healthcare to pioneering renewable-energy solutions, we are not just supporting Finland’s present needs but also building a brighter, more sustainable future. “

    Driving innovation and sustainability

    In 2024, half of the EIB Group’s funding in Finland was allocated to the green transition and a third to business innovation. This marks a 215% rise in support for Finnish sustainability and innovation compared with the previous year.

    “Finland stands as a leading example of innovation and sustainability in Europe,” said Östros.

    The EIB Group’s financing in Finland last year targeted a range of sectors including industrial investments, energy, education and healthcare.

    Key green transition and innovation projects

    Green transition and innovation projects backed by the EIB last year included a €168 million investment in the Keliber lithium project to enhance the EU’s battery material supply for electric vehicles and high-tech industries. Additionally, Prysmian’s factory in Pikkala received more than €221 million in EIB funding to expand its production of extra-high-voltage submarine power cables, supporting the EU’s clean energy-transmission goals.

    Furthermore, the EIB invested €150 million to replace Helsinki’s fossil-based heating plants with renewable energy, supporting the city’s sustainability and carbon-reduction efforts as part of REPowerEU. In addition, the EIB provided a €435 million loan to Stora Enso for producing sustainable packaging at the Oulu factory, promoting a circular economy with renewable materials.

    Lastly, Swappie received a €14 million venture-debt loan to refurbish and resell iPhones, reducing electronic waste and extending the lifecycle of devices, making high-quality technology more accessible.

    Empowering SMEs and Mid-Caps

    The EIB Group’s support for Finnish SMEs and Mid-Caps last year included a €200 million partnership with Finnvera. This initiative aimed to tackle barriers to accessing finance by sharing risks associated with economic uncertainties such as inflation, high interest rates, limited external growth opportunities, and unpredictable energy supplies.

    For its part, the EIF collaborated with leading Finnish banks to provide over €560 million in loan guarantees last year. This substantial financing empowers SMEs, small Mid-Caps and housing associations to advance Finland’s climate goals, promote environmental sustainability and invest in innovation and digitalisation. In addition, the EIF made two new commitments in Finnish venture capital and private equity funds.

    Investing in public infrastructure

    The EU bank prioritised healthcare and education infrastructure in 2024, making significant investments in Finland’s public sector. A €100 million loan will upgrade Helsinki’s Laakso hospital, providing state-of-the-art medical services. Thousands of children in Tuusula will benefit from modern schools funded by a €105 million EIB loan. Additionally, the EIB is financing water-infrastructure projects in the Helsinki area, promoting sustainable water management, one of the key priorities of the bank.

    Over the past five years, the EIB Group has provided nearly €8.6 billion in financing for Finland, highlighting the organisation’s dedication to the country’s economic growth and development.

    For more information on EIB Group results in 2024, please click here.

    Background information     

    EIB

    The European Investment Bank (ElB) is the long-term lending institution of the European Union, owned by its Member States. It finances investments that contribute to EU policy objectives. EIB projects bolster competitiveness, drive innovation, promote sustainable development, enhance social and territorial cohesion, and support a just and swift transition to climate neutrality. 

    The EIB Group, which also includes the European Investment Fund (EIF), signed a total of €88 billion in new financing for over 900 projects in 2023. These commitments are expected to mobilise around €320 billion in investment, supporting 400 000 companies and 5.4 million jobs.  

    All projects financed by the EIB Group are in line with the Paris Climate Accord. The EIB Group does not fund investments in fossil fuels. We are on track to deliver on our commitment to support  €1 trillion in climate and environmental sustainability investment in the decade to 2030 as pledged in our Climate Bank Roadmap. Over half of the EIB Group’s annual financing supports projects directly contributing to climate change mitigation, adaptation, and a healthier environment.  

    Approximately half of the EIB’s financing within the European Union is directed towards cohesion regions, where per capita income is lower. This underscores the Bank’s commitment to fostering inclusive growth and the convergence of living standards. 

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EIB Group achieves record results in 2024, targets €95 billion in investments for 2025

    Source: European Investment Bank

    • The EIB Group supported a record of over €100 billion in new investment for Europe’s energy security in 2024.
    • A record of nearly 60% of all EIB Group financing supported the green transition, climate action and environmental sustainability.
    • There was a sharp increase in higher-risk activities, with a record €8 billion committed for equity and quasi-equity investment.
    • Financing for security and defence projects doubled to €1 billion in 2024, with a further doubling planned in 2025.

    The European Investment Bank (EIB) Group signed €89 billion in new financing last year. The Group made more investments than ever before to strengthen EU energy security, mobilising over €100 billion for projects in new and upgraded infrastructure such as grids and interconnectors, renewables, net-zero industries, efficiency and storage. Nearly 60% of the total financing supported the green transition, climate action and environmental sustainability.

    Our preliminary results once again signal robust profitability. At the same time, higher-risk EIB operations to back Europe’s most innovative companies have sharply increased. A record €8 billion in equity and quasi-equity investment from the EIB and the European Investment Fund (EIF) is expected to mobilise €110 billion in growth capital for startups, scale-ups and European pioneers.

    Eligible security and defence investment doubled in 2024, and the goal is to double this figure again this year. Furthermore, the EIB Group significantly extended its eligible investments in dual-use projects, which now include border protection, military mobility, de-mining and de-contamination, space, cybersecurity, anti-jamming equipment, seabed and critical infrastructure protection, research and development, and drones.  

    Looking ahead, the EIB Group plans to increase its overall investments to €95 billion in 2025, with flagship initiatives to support European tech champions and a dedicated TechEU programme, critical raw materials, water management, the energy efficiency of small and medium-sized companies, and a dedicated platform to promote sustainable and affordable housing.

    In parallel with increasing its investment capacity and impact, the EIB Group is making significant progress in cutting red tape for clients and has shortened the time to market required to approve and deploy new investments. During 2024, it introduced simplified appraisal procedures covering more than 40% of its operations.

    “We have broken records with our financing in 2024. We have made ourselves ready to support EU priorities in this new political mandate. And we will play an even more relevant role in 2025 – building on the excellent performance of the EIB Group to increase our impact, bolstering Europe’s security and competitiveness with strategic and ambitious investments,” said EIB Group President Nadia Calviño as she presented the annual operational results of the EIB Group in Brussels.

    Making records

    The EIB Group financing committed in 2024 is expected to power almost 15 million households with clean energy, create up to 1.5 million new jobs in Europe over the next few years, advance therapies against cancer, and help secure affordable housing from Croatia to Latvia.

    In more detail, highlights from last year include:

    • Stepped up higher-risk activities, expected to mobilise about €110 billion in new investments. This includes a record €7.2 billion of investments by the EIF in the equity funds ecosystem, and €1 billion in venture debt by the EIB.
    • More than €14 billion in total investment deployed by the EIF to support Europe’s small businesses and innovators, including in 102 venture capital funds, such as a dedicated fund to back women-owned and gender-balanced startups in space and deep tech.
    • A record €51 billion – around 60% of last year’s investments – to support the green transition, climate action and environmental sustainability, from the world’s first zero-emissions tyre factory in Romania to support for sustainable mobility in Valencia, keeping the EIB Group well on track to meet its target of supporting €1 trillion in climate and environmental sustainability investment in the critical decade to 2030.
    • A record €31 billion to back EU energy security, including for efficiency, renewables, storage and electricity grids, which is expected to support over €100 billion in investment. Flagship initiatives include counter-guarantees to bolster European wind manufacturers, electric vehicle battery manufacturing in France and the Princess Elisabeth Island in Belgium. For grids and storage, financing rose to a record €8.5 billion, mobilising 40% of Europe’s total investment in that sector in 2024, including transmission network upgrades and interconnectors in Spain, Czechia and Germany.
    • Support for eligible security and defence projects doubled to €1 billion, including the deployment of dual-use satellites in Poland, port upgrades to meet the needs of NATO vessels in Denmark and investment by the EIF in dedicated private investment funds. A further doubling of annual investments to €2 billion is expected this year.
    • A record €38 billion to accelerate social and territorial cohesion, including credit lines for farmers in Romania, innovative startups in Greece and just transition projects in Estonia.
    • The EIB Group has also provided financial support to boost climate resilience and adaptation from post-landslide reconstruction in Italy to recovery investments in European regions affected by devastating floods.
    • With more than €2.2 billion disbursed since 2022, EIB Group investments in Ukraine are helping to repair schools, kindergartens and hospitals, upgrade transport and protect energy infrastructure, as well as support the private sector.

    Beyond Ukraine, the EIB Group’s operations outside the European Union are supporting stability in the EU neighbourhood and partner countries on their path to EU membership, including with rail upgrades in countries such as Albania and Montenegro.

    Supporting EU global priorities and helping strengthen Europe’s voice in the world, EIB Group financing also helps drought-stricken countries like Jordan to manage water supplies. Thanks to reinforced partnerships inside and outside the European Union, EIB investments are helping eliminate diseases like polio and support sustainable infrastructure around the world from Vietnam to India.

    Ready for the challenges ahead

    Under President Calviño, who took office in January 2024, the EIB Group has updated its internal policies and investment strategy to maximise impact and scale up support for shared European priorities.

    Changes include:

    • A Strategic Roadmap, aligned with EU policies and agreed by the EU 27 Member States (the EIB’s shareholders) to focus resources on impactful investment on eight core priorities.
    • A revamped framework expanding the EIB Group’s activity in the areas of security and defence, with streamlined internal procedures and new partnerships with external stakeholders, such as the NATO Innovation Fund and the European Defence Agency.
    • EIB governors approved the increase of the gearing ratio, an outdated limit on EIB Group’s investments.[1] This will enable the EIB Group to make the necessary strategic investments to deliver on EU policy goals while preserving its leverage and capital ratios.
    • An action plan with building blocks for a deeper capital markets union.
    • Actions and proposals to cut red tape, improve the usability of EU sustainability reporting rules and optimise the use of EU budget instruments.
    • A stepped up time to market initiative to simplify internal processes and boost efficiency, enabling much faster approvals for new financing.
    • An action plan to improve transparency, accountability and well-being in the workplace, including the appointment of an ombudsperson to swiftly address common workplace issues and improve the working environment.

    More relevant than ever in 2025

    Looking ahead, the EIB Group Operational Plan covers up to €95 billion in new investment in 2025, supported by the Group’s stellar credit rating and strong capital position.

    New initiatives aligned with the priorities of the new European Commission expected to be rolled out in 2025 include:

    • Maintaining a 60% green finance target.
    • Scaling up support for leading technologies, including clean-tech, artificial intelligence, chips, high-performance and quantum computing, health sciences and medical technologies, and Europe’s cutting-edge industrial capacity.
    • An exit platform to facilitate the listing of European scale-ups in EU markets or the acquisition of these promising innovators by European companies.
    • An extension of the highly successful European Tech Champions Initiative (ETCI) as part of the broader goal to boost equity and venture debt investments to scale up Europe’s innovative startups.
    • Further doubling of support for Europe’s security and defence industry
    • A pan-European investment platform for affordable and sustainable housing, together with the European Commission and increased financing for the housing sector.
    • Increasing investment for critical raw materials projects, such as the Keliber lithium production facility in Finland agreed last year.
    • A dedicated water programme of about €4.5 billion to focus investment on flood resilience, and to address water scarcity amid intensifying droughts.
    • New support for Europe’s farmers through agricultural insurance and other de-risking schemes, building on a €3 billion facility to improve access to financing for young farmers and women.
    • A €2.5 billion programme to scale up energy efficiency investments by small and medium-sized companies so they can lower their CO2 emissions and electricity bills.

    EIB Group press conference on annual results

    Background information

    The EIB Group is the financing institution of the European Union owned by its Member States. It supports investment contributing toward EU policy goals, including sustainable growth, social and territorial cohesion, innovation and security. It finances its operations in global capital markets and has been consistently profitable in its operations since its inception. The EIB Group is the pioneer and one of the largest issuers of green bonds, while all of its operations are aligned with the Paris Climate Agreement.


    [1] Subject to final approval by the Council of the European Union.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI: Real Matters Reports First Quarter Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, Jan. 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Real Matters Inc. (TSX: REAL) (“Real Matters” or the “Company”), a leading network management services platform for the mortgage and insurance industries, today announced its financial results for the first quarter ended December 31, 2024.

    “We reported consolidated revenue of $41.0 million in the first quarter, up 16% year-over-year, and consolidated Net Revenue(A) increased 12% led by growth in all three segments. Refinance origination volumes in our U.S. Title segment were up 46% year-over-year and Net Revenue(A) margins increased by 610 basis points,” said Real Matters Chief Executive Officer Brian Lang.

    “There are now 8.8 million outstanding mortgages with interest rates above 6%, which represents a sizeable pool of potential refinance candidates. We are encouraged by the market opportunity we saw as a result of a short-term rally in rates in September – adding to our conviction of the market potential for refinance going forward. As a result, we are seeing broad pipeline movement; we are confident that we will have new, active franchise title clients in the coming months,” added Lang.

    “We have a strong balance sheet, and we will continue to prudently manage our cost base to align with market conditions, ensuring we focus on growth as headwinds turn to tailwinds for our business. We are at a key inflection point for our title business,” concluded Lang.

    Q1 2025 Highlights

    • Consolidated revenue of $41.0 million –16% year-over-year increase
    • Consolidated Net Revenue(A) of $10.9 million – 12% year-over-year increase
    • Adjusted EBITDA(A) loss of $1.7 million compared with loss of $1.1 million in Q1’24
    • Net income of $2.3 million up from net loss of $3.6 million in Q1’24
    • Launched five new clients
    • Significant operating leverage in Canadian segment – converted 90% of the incremental Net Revenue(A) to Adjusted EBITDA(A) in Q1’25
    • Cash and cash equivalents of $49.0 million and no outstanding debt as at December 31, 2024

    Financial and Operational Summary

        Quarter ended      
      2025 2024 2024 2024 2024     % Change1
        Q1     Q4     Q3     Q2     Q1     Quarter
    over
    Quarter
    Year
    over
    Year
    Consolidated                          
    Revenue $ 41.0   $ 45.6   $ 49.5   $ 42.2   $ 35.4     -10 % 16 %
    Net Revenue(A) $ 10.9   $ 12.0   $ 13.1   $ 11.5   $ 9.7     -10 % 12 %
    Adjusted EBITDA(A) $ (1.7 ) $ 0.6   $ 1.7   $ 0.7   $ (1.1 )   -395 % -54 %
    Net income (loss) $ 2.3   $ (0.2 ) $ 1.7   $ 2.1   $ (3.6 )   1,562 % 163 %
    Net income (loss) per diluted share $ 0.03   $ 0.00   $ 0.02   $ 0.03   $ (0.05 )   0 % 160 %
    Adjusted Net (loss) income(A) $ (0.3 ) $ 0.9   $ 1.7   $ 1.3   $ (1.2 )   -129 % 75 %
    Adjusted Net (loss) income(A) per diluted share $ 0.00   $ 0.01   $ 0.02   $ 0.02   $ (0.02 )   -100 % 100 %
                               
    U.S. Appraisal segment                          
    Revenue $ 29.4   $ 33.8   $ 37.5   $ 32.6   $ 26.8     -13 % 9 %
    Net Revenue(A) $ 7.8   $ 9.0   $ 10.3   $ 9.2   $ 7.5     -14 % 4 %
    Net Revenue(A) margin   26.5 %   26.7 %   27.6 %   28.3 %   27.9 %      
    Adjusted EBITDA(A) $ 2.4   $ 4.1   $ 5.5   $ 4.4   $ 2.7     -41 % -10 %
    Adjusted EBITDA(A) margin   30.9 %   45.2 %   53.2 %   47.9 %   35.8 %      
                               
    U.S. Title segment                          
    Revenue $ 2.5   $ 2.4   $ 2.1   $ 2.0   $ 2.0     4 % 25 %
    Net Revenue(A) $ 1.4     1.2   $ 0.9     0.9   $ 1.0     12 % 41 %
    Net Revenue(A) margin   53.4 %   49.8 %   43.6 %   44.0 %   47.3 %      
    Adjusted EBITDA(A) $ (1.8 ) $ (1.6 ) $ (1.9 ) $ (1.7 ) $ (1.6 )   -13 % -11 %
    Adjusted EBITDA(A) margin   -132.3 %   -131.4 %   -209.8 %   -184.8 %   -167.9 %      
                               
    Canadian segment                          
    Revenue $ 9.1   $ 9.4   $ 9.9   $ 7.6   $ 6.6     -3 % 38 %
    Net Revenue(A) $ 1.7   $ 1.8   $ 1.9   $ 1.4   $ 1.2     -3 % 39 %
    Net Revenue(A) margin   18.9 %   18.9 %   19.0 %   18.9 %   18.8 %      
    Adjusted EBITDA(A) $ 1.1   $ 1.2   $ 1.3   $ 0.9   $ 0.7     -5 % 62 %
    Adjusted EBITDA(A) margin   66.1 %   67.7 %   69.3 %   62.3 %   56.8 %      
                               
    Corporate segment                          
    Adjusted EBITDA(A) $ (3.4 ) $ (3.1 ) $ (3.2 ) $ (2.9 ) $ (2.9 )   -8 % -20 %
    1. Percentage change is calculated based on figures disclosed in our MD&A which are rounded to the nearest thousands of dollars.

    Conference Call and Webcast
    A conference call to review the results will take place at 10:00 a.m. (ET) on Thursday, January 30, 2025, hosted by Chief Executive Officer Brian Lang and Chief Financial Officer Rodrigo Pinto. An accompanying slide presentation will be posted to the Investor section of our website shortly before the call.

    To access the call:

    • Participant Local (Toronto): (289) 819-1520
    • Participant Toll Free Dial-In Number: 1-800-549-8228
    • Conference ID: 15714

    To listen to the live webcast of the call:

    The webcast will be archived and a transcript of the call will be available in the Investor section of our website following the call.

    (A)   Non-GAAP Measures
    The non-GAAP measures used in this news release, including Net Revenue, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS® Accounting Standards and are therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. These non-GAAP measures are more fully defined and discussed in the Company’s MD&A for the three months ended December 31, 2024 under the heading “Non-GAAP measures”, which is incorporated by reference in this Press Release and available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

    Real Matters financial results for the three months ended December 31, 2024 are included in the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying MD&A, each of which are available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca. In addition, supplemental information is available on our website at www.realmatters.com.

    Net Revenue represents the difference between revenues and transaction costs. Net Revenue margin is calculated as Net Revenue divided by Revenues. The reconciling items between net income or loss and Net Revenue were as follows:

                Quarter ended
        Q1 2025     Q4 2024     Q3 2024     Q2 2024     Q1 2024
                         
    Net income (loss) $ 2.3   $ (0.2 ) $ 1.7   $ 2.1   $ (3.6)
    Operating expenses   12.7     12.6     11.8     11.2     11.6
    Amortization   0.7     0.8     0.8     0.8     0.8
    Restructuring expenses   0.4                
    Interest expense   0.1     0.1     0.1     0.1     0.1
    Interest income   (0.5 )   (0.5 )   (0.5 )   (0.4 )   (0.4)
    Net foreign exchange (gain) loss   (6.1 )   1.3     (0.9 )   (2.2 )   2.0
    Loss (gain) on fair value of derivatives   1.7     (1.9 )   (0.1 )   0.1     (0.2)
    Income tax (recovery) expense   (0.4 )   (0.2 )   0.2     (0.2 )   (0.6)
    Net Revenue $ 10.9   $ 12.0   $ 13.1   $ 11.5   $ 9.7

    Adjusted EBITDA represents net income or loss before stock-based compensation expense, amortization, restructuring expenses, interest expense, interest income, net foreign exchange gain or loss, gain or loss on fair value of derivatives and income tax expense or recovery. Adjusted EBITDA margin is calculated as Adjusted EBITDA divided by Net Revenue. The reconciling items between net income or loss and Adjusted EBITDA were as follows:

                Quarter ended
        Q1 2025     Q4 2024     Q3 2024     Q2 2024     Q1 2024
                         
    Net income (loss) $ 2.3   $ (0.2 ) $ 1.7   $ 2.1   $ (3.6)
    Stock-based compensation expense   0.1     1.2     0.4     0.4     0.8
    Amortization   0.7     0.8     0.8     0.8     0.8
    Restructuring expenses   0.4                
    Interest expense   0.1     0.1     0.1     0.1     0.1
    Interest income   (0.5 )   (0.5 )   (0.5 )   (0.4 )   (0.4)
    Net foreign exchange (gain) loss   (6.1 )   1.3     (0.9 )   (2.2 )   2.0
    Loss (gain) on fair value of derivatives   1.7     (1.9 )   (0.1 )   0.1     (0.2)
    Income tax (recovery) expense   (0.4 )   (0.2 )   0.2     (0.2 )   (0.6)
    Adjusted EBITDA $ (1.7 ) $ 0.6   $ 1.7   $ 0.7   $ (1.1)

    The reconciling items between net income or loss and Adjusted Net Income or Loss were as follows:

                Quarter ended
        Q1 2025     Q4 2024     Q3 2024     Q2 2024     Q1 2024
                         
    Net income (loss) $ 2.3   $ (0.2 ) $ 1.7   $ 2.1   $ (3.6)
    Stock-based compensation expense   0.1     1.2     0.4     0.4     0.8
    Amortization of intangibles   0.4     0.5     0.4     0.4     0.4
    Restructuring expenses   0.4                
    Net foreign exchange (gain) loss   (6.1 )   1.3     (0.9 )   (2.2 )   2.0
    Loss (gain) on fair value of derivatives   1.7     (1.9 )   (0.1 )   0.1     (0.2)
    Related tax effects   0.9         0.2     0.5     (0.6)
    Adjusted Net (Loss) Income $ (0.3 ) $ 0.9   $ 1.7   $ 1.3   $ (1.2)

    Forward-Looking Information
    This Press Release contains “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities laws. Words such as “could”, “forecast”, “target”, “may”, “will”, “would”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “intend”, “plan”, “seek”, “believe”, “likely” and “predict” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking information, although not all forward-looking information contains these identifying words.

    The forward-looking information in this Press Release includes statements which reflect the current expectations of management with respect to our business and the industry in which we operate and is based on management’s experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments, as well as other factors that management believes appropriate and reasonable in the circumstances. The forward-looking information reflects management’s beliefs based on information currently available to management, including information obtained from third party sources, and should not be read as a guarantee of the occurrence or timing of any future events, performance or results.

    The forward-looking information in this Press Release is subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that are difficult to predict and that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or results anticipated by the forward-looking information. A comprehensive discussion of the factors which could cause results or events to differ from current expectations can be found in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Information Form for the year ended September 30, 2024, which is available on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca.

    Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking information, which reflect our expectations only as of the date of this Press Release. Except as required by law, we do not undertake to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    About Real Matters
    Real Matters is a leading network management services provider for the mortgage lending and insurance industries. Real Matters’ platform combines its proprietary technology and network management capabilities with tens of thousands of independent qualified field professionals to create an efficient marketplace for the provision of mortgage lending and insurance industry services. Our clients include top 100 mortgage lenders in the U.S. and some of the largest banks and insurance companies in Canada. We are a leading independent provider of residential real estate appraisals to the mortgage market and a leading independent provider of title services in the U.S. Headquartered in Markham (ON), Real Matters has principal offices in Buffalo (NY) and Middletown (RI). Real Matters is listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the symbol REAL. For more information, visit www.realmatters.com.

    For more information:
    Lyne Beauregard
    Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications
    Real Matters
    lbeauregard@realmatters.com
    416.994.5930

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: reAlpha Tech Corp. Appoints Piyush Phadke as CFO

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    DUBLIN, Ohio, Jan. 30, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — reAlpha Tech Corp. (Nasdaq: AIRE) (“reAlpha” or the “Company”), a real estate technology company developing and commercializing artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies, is pleased to announce the appointment of Piyush Phadke as Chief Financial Officer, effective January 30, 2025. Mr. Phadke will succeed Rakesh Prasad, the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer, and he will oversee the Company’s financial and accounting operations, reporting directly to the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer, Mike Logozzo.

    With over 20 years of experience in finance, capital raising and strategic leadership, Mr. Phadke brings a wealth of expertise to reAlpha. Prior to joining reAlpha, he served as a Managing Director at BTIG, LLC, where he specialized in providing investment banking services for lower middle-market companies. Mr. Phadke also held senior investment banking positions at Jefferies LLC and Bank of America, where he focused on capital markets transactions for private equity clients.

    “We’re excited to welcome Piyush to the team,” said Mike Logozzo, President and Chief Operating Officer of reAlpha. “His extensive background in investment banking and capital markets will be invaluable as we continue to execute on our growth strategy. We believe Piyush’s leadership will strengthen our financial infrastructure and support our mission to be a global leader in the real estate tech space.”

    “I am thrilled to join reAlpha at this pivotal moment,” said Mr. Phadke. “reAlpha’s commitment to leverage AI technologies for the real estate industry is inspiring, and I expect to utilize my background in capital raising and investment banking to help reAlpha accelerate its financial and operational objectives.”

    As a first order of business, Mr. Phadke will focus on optimizing reAlpha’s capital structure and strengthening its balance sheet.

    For more information about Mr. Phadke’s appointment and related compensation arrangement, please refer to the Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

    About reAlpha Tech Corp.

    reAlpha Tech Corp. (Nasdaq: AIRE) is a real estate technology company developing an end-to-end commission-free homebuying platform. Utilizing the power of AI and an acquisition-led growth strategy, reAlpha’s goal is to offer a more affordable, streamlined experience for those on the journey to homeownership. For more information, visit www.realpha.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    The information in this press release includes “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements about the appointment of Mr. Phadke as Chief Financial Officer and the anticipated benefits thereof. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “could”, “might”, “plan”, “possible”, “project”, “strive”, “budget”, “forecast”, “expect”, “intend”, “will”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “predict”, “potential” or “continue”, or the negatives of these terms or variations of them or similar terminology. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from current expectations include, but are not limited to: reAlpha’s limited operating history and that reAlpha has not yet fully developed its AI-based technologies; reAlpha’s ability to commercialize its developing AI-based technologies; whether reAlpha’s technology and products will be accepted and adopted by its customers and intended users; reAlpha’s ability to integrate the business of its acquired companies into its existing business and the anticipated demand for such acquired companies’ services; reAlpha’s ability to successfully enter new geographic markets; reAlpha’s ability to obtain the necessary regulatory and legal approvals to expand into additional U.S. states and maintain, or obtain, brokerage licenses in such states; reAlpha’s ability to generate additional sales or revenue from having access to, or obtaining, additional U.S. states brokerage licenses; reAlpha’s inability to accurately forecast demand for short-term rentals, corporate relocation programs and AI-based real estate focused products; the inability to execute business objectives and growth strategies successfully or sustain reAlpha’s growth; the inability of reAlpha’s customers to pay for reAlpha’s services; changes in applicable laws or regulations, and the impact of the regulatory environment and complexities with compliance related to such environment; and other risks and uncertainties indicated in reAlpha’s SEC filings. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date the statements are made and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Although reAlpha believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. reAlpha’s future results, level of activity, performance or achievements may differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, and there is no representation that the actual results achieved will be the same, in whole or in part, as those set out in the forward-looking statements. For more information about the factors that could cause such differences, please refer to reAlpha’s filings with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and reAlpha does not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

    Investor Relations Contact
    investorrelations@realpha.com

    Media Contact
    Alliance Advisors IR on behalf of reAlpha
    Fatema Bhabrawala
    FBhabrawala@allianceadvisors.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Anti-immigration policies: why harsh new rules put in place by Trump and other rich countries won’t last

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Alan Hirsch, Research Fellow New South Institute, Emeritus Professor at The Nelson Mandela School of Public Governance, University of Cape Town

    Donald Trump, America’s new president, has cut back massively on US commitments to asylum seekers, blocked all asylum processes and started to remove irregular immigrants.

    Trump’s new measures are far reaching. They include the suspension of the US refugee admissions programme. Flights booked for refugees to the US have been cancelled. Arrests and deportations have begun.

    Strongly anti-immigrant policies were also pursued under the Biden administration, though Trump’s dramatic steps take them much further. Other countries in the global north have also introduced tougher policies. The 2024 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum sets out tougher border controls, quicker assessment of asylum seekers and swifter removal of those who did not qualify. In the UK, Labour prime minister Keir Starmer has promised to bring down the net migration rate and treat people-smugglers like terrorists.

    Based on my research into migration over the past 30 years I believe that these measures are unlikely to last. There are two linked trends that make closing the borders of the global north impractical and destined for revision.

    The first is that populations in most of the global north are ageing fast (on average) and the fertility rate, or natural population growth rate, has plummeted. There are many more older people as a percentage of the population.

    Secondly, with a workforce shrinking and the dependency ratio (the proportion of non-working to working people) rising rapidly, closing borders to potential labourers from other countries, without any other change, would lead to declining living standards in the global north. Economic growth and government revenues would slow or stagnate, undermining infrastructure maintenance and social service provision.

    There are several possible strategies that could be alternatives to anti-immigration measures. Some older people could migrate south, robots and AI could do more work, workers in the global south could perform remote work for the north, and arrangements could be made to allow migrants into the north either permanently or as circulating migrants.

    All these strategies are already in use, if modestly. Their application would have to expand considerably.

    Misplaced panic

    The responses of governments in the global north are exaggerated. Governments putting in place tough anti-immigrant measures have done so on the back of a narrative that there’s been a significant rise in the number of migrants worldwide.

    This isn’t true. Some countries, such as the US, Germany and Colombia, have seen a spike in refugees and other migrants. But for the rest of the world the picture remains much the same as it has done for decades.

    Foreign-born residents (the most widely used definition of migrants) rose as a proportion of residents worldwide from 2.3% in 1970 to 3.6% in 2020. But in 1960 the number was over 3%, and in the late 1800s migrants made up somewhere between 3% and 5% of the global population.

    So, 3.6% is nothing new.

    As for refugees, in 2023 there were about 38 million, of whom 69% sought refuge in neighbouring countries and 75% in middle- and low-income countries.

    In general, therefore, rich countries have not been carrying the greatest burden.

    The real reason behind these tougher measures is that living standards have stagnated in many countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The cost and availability of housing have worsened; inequality has grown since the 1980s; the quality and availability of public services have deteriorated since the global financial crisis of 2008 and COVID-19; and the quality of employment has shifted to precarious work and poorly paid service sector occupations.

    This has contributed to the rise of populism, including anti-foreigner sentiment and even xenophobia.

    Trump’s actions are the most extreme yet. They include an order to block “aliens involved in the invasion” using “appropriate measures” that give the security forces further powers. The prohibition of southern border asylum hearings in the US and the instruction to “remain in Mexico” means that prospective asylum seekers from third countries may not cross the border to make their applications at the port of entry. They must apply remotely.

    Trump has also ordered that birthright citizenship must be limited to the children of certain categories of residents, essentially citizens or those with residence rights in the form of a “green card”. This move has been temporarily blocked in some states by judges as unconstitutional.

    In addition, the acting head of the Homeland Security Department gave Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials the power to deport migrants admitted temporarily into the US under several programmes of the Biden administration, targeting refugees from Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Haiti, and possibly Afghan and Ukrainian refugees too.

    The very first bill to receive final approval from the US Congress under Trump’s second term, the Laken-Riley Act, would require the detention and deportation of migrants who enter the country without authorisation and are charged with certain crimes. This bill was passed with 263 votes and 156 votes against, meaning that 46 House Democrats supported the Republican bill.

    In contrast, in the global south, as I have discussed elsewhere, the trend has been in the opposite direction. South American regional communities liberalised migration most extensively in recent decades, but African regional communities have made progress too, as has the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

    The way forward

    Some alternative strategies are leading the way.

    In Canada, the Temporary Foreign Worker programme has expanded steadily since 1973, increasingly including long-term circulating migrating lower-skilled workers for key occupations like catering, care, construction and agriculture. Though it is currently under political scrutiny because of the panic in the north over migration, and because of housing shortages in Canada, it is likely to survive and evolve. Similar systems are emerging across the global north.

    In the EU, Talent Partnerships are now encouraged. Germany, for example, has talent partnerships with Kenya and Morocco, where they train health workers and IT technicians in those countries to work and live in Germany. Spain has various partnerships in Latin America and Africa. Prime minister Pedro Sanchez has chosen to be upfront on the choices. In October last year he told the Spanish people:

    Spain needs to choose between being an open and prosperous country or a closed off poor country.

    The current fashion for population protectionism in the global north is increasingly nasty, but it is unlikely to stand the test of time. Several constructive responses to the rising dependency ratio are feasible, but being open to more migration, possibly in new forms and through new channels. is an inevitable part of the solution.

    New formal pathways for working migrants and reasonable systems for asylum seekers, along with full enforcement of rules against irregular migrants, could be the combination that works politically and economically.

    – Anti-immigration policies: why harsh new rules put in place by Trump and other rich countries won’t last
    – https://theconversation.com/anti-immigration-policies-why-harsh-new-rules-put-in-place-by-trump-and-other-rich-countries-wont-last-248359

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Global: Anti-immigration policies: why harsh new rules put in place by Trump and other rich countries won’t last

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Alan Hirsch, Research Fellow New South Institute, Emeritus Professor at The Nelson Mandela School of Public Governance, University of Cape Town

    Donald Trump, America’s new president, has cut back massively on US commitments to asylum seekers, blocked all asylum processes and started to remove irregular immigrants.

    Trump’s new measures are far reaching. They include the suspension of the US refugee admissions programme. Flights booked for refugees to the US have been cancelled. Arrests and deportations have begun.

    Strongly anti-immigrant policies were also pursued under the Biden administration, though Trump’s dramatic steps take them much further. Other countries in the global north have also introduced tougher policies. The 2024 EU Pact on Migration and Asylum sets out tougher border controls, quicker assessment of asylum seekers and swifter removal of those who did not qualify. In the UK, Labour prime minister Keir Starmer has promised to bring down the net migration rate and treat people-smugglers like terrorists.

    Based on my research into migration over the past 30 years I believe that these measures are unlikely to last. There are two linked trends that make closing the borders of the global north impractical and destined for revision.

    The first is that populations in most of the global north are ageing fast (on average) and the fertility rate, or natural population growth rate, has plummeted. There are many more older people as a percentage of the population.

    Secondly, with a workforce shrinking and the dependency ratio (the proportion of non-working to working people) rising rapidly, closing borders to potential labourers from other countries, without any other change, would lead to declining living standards in the global north. Economic growth and government revenues would slow or stagnate, undermining infrastructure maintenance and social service provision.

    There are several possible strategies that could be alternatives to anti-immigration measures. Some older people could migrate south, robots and AI could do more work, workers in the global south could perform remote work for the north, and arrangements could be made to allow migrants into the north either permanently or as circulating migrants.

    All these strategies are already in use, if modestly. Their application would have to expand considerably.

    Misplaced panic

    The responses of governments in the global north are exaggerated. Governments putting in place tough anti-immigrant measures have done so on the back of a narrative that there’s been a significant rise in the number of migrants worldwide.

    This isn’t true. Some countries, such as the US, Germany and Colombia, have seen a spike in refugees and other migrants. But for the rest of the world the picture remains much the same as it has done for decades.

    Foreign-born residents (the most widely used definition of migrants) rose as a proportion of residents worldwide from 2.3% in 1970 to 3.6% in 2020. But in 1960 the number was over 3%, and in the late 1800s migrants made up somewhere between 3% and 5% of the global population.

    So, 3.6% is nothing new.

    As for refugees, in 2023 there were about 38 million, of whom 69% sought refuge in neighbouring countries and 75% in middle- and low-income countries.

    In general, therefore, rich countries have not been carrying the greatest burden.

    The real reason behind these tougher measures is that living standards have stagnated in many countries in the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The cost and availability of housing have worsened; inequality has grown since the 1980s; the quality and availability of public services have deteriorated since the global financial crisis of 2008 and COVID-19; and the quality of employment has shifted to precarious work and poorly paid service sector occupations.

    This has contributed to the rise of populism, including anti-foreigner sentiment and even xenophobia.

    Trump’s actions are the most extreme yet. They include an order to block “aliens involved in the invasion” using “appropriate measures” that give the security forces further powers. The prohibition of southern border asylum hearings in the US and the instruction to “remain in Mexico” means that prospective asylum seekers from third countries may not cross the border to make their applications at the port of entry. They must apply remotely.

    Trump has also ordered that birthright citizenship must be limited to the children of certain categories of residents, essentially citizens or those with residence rights in the form of a “green card”. This move has been temporarily blocked in some states by judges as unconstitutional.

    In addition, the acting head of the Homeland Security Department gave Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials the power to deport migrants admitted temporarily into the US under several programmes of the Biden administration, targeting refugees from Cuba, Nicaragua, Venezuela and Haiti, and possibly Afghan and Ukrainian refugees too.

    The very first bill to receive final approval from the US Congress under Trump’s second term, the Laken-Riley Act, would require the detention and deportation of migrants who enter the country without authorisation and are charged with certain crimes. This bill was passed with 263 votes and 156 votes against, meaning that 46 House Democrats supported the Republican bill.

    In contrast, in the global south, as I have discussed elsewhere, the trend has been in the opposite direction. South American regional communities liberalised migration most extensively in recent decades, but African regional communities have made progress too, as has the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

    The way forward

    Some alternative strategies are leading the way.

    In Canada, the Temporary Foreign Worker programme has expanded steadily since 1973, increasingly including long-term circulating migrating lower-skilled workers for key occupations like catering, care, construction and agriculture. Though it is currently under political scrutiny because of the panic in the north over migration, and because of housing shortages in Canada, it is likely to survive and evolve. Similar systems are emerging across the global north.

    In the EU, Talent Partnerships are now encouraged. Germany, for example, has talent partnerships with Kenya and Morocco, where they train health workers and IT technicians in those countries to work and live in Germany. Spain has various partnerships in Latin America and Africa. Prime minister Pedro Sanchez has chosen to be upfront on the choices. In October last year he told the Spanish people:

    Spain needs to choose between being an open and prosperous country or a closed off poor country.

    The current fashion for population protectionism in the global north is increasingly nasty, but it is unlikely to stand the test of time. Several constructive responses to the rising dependency ratio are feasible, but being open to more migration, possibly in new forms and through new channels. is an inevitable part of the solution.

    New formal pathways for working migrants and reasonable systems for asylum seekers, along with full enforcement of rules against irregular migrants, could be the combination that works politically and economically.

    Alan Hirsch receives funding from the New South Institute for research and the University of Cape Town for advice and supervision.

    ref. Anti-immigration policies: why harsh new rules put in place by Trump and other rich countries won’t last – https://theconversation.com/anti-immigration-policies-why-harsh-new-rules-put-in-place-by-trump-and-other-rich-countries-wont-last-248359

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: ‘Sustainable’ aviation fuel and other myths about green airport expansion debunked

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Jack Marley, Environment + Energy Editor, UK edition

    Taking off: emissions from the aviation sector. WildSnap/Shutterstock

    Environmentalists and locals have resisted a third runway at London’s Heathrow, Europe’s busiest airport, for more than two decades. Today, their efforts took a major setback.

    The UK government has announced it will give the green light to airport expansion. This is not guaranteed to increase growth in the national economy as Chancellor Rachel Reeves hopes. More flights and more emissions are certain, however, at a time when experts are practically screaming at governments to rein them in.


    This roundup of The Conversation’s climate coverage comes from our award-winning weekly climate action newsletter. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 40,000+ readers who’ve subscribed.


    “No airport expansions should proceed” without a UK-wide plan to annually assess and control the sector’s climate impact said the government’s watchdog, the Climate Change Committee, in 2023. Aeroplanes are 8% of UK emissions and 2% of the world’s, but they also release gases that seed heat-trapping clouds in the upper atmosphere, which triples air travel’s greenhouse effect.

    While the government’s own advisers have effectively ruled out new runways for the sake of net zero, airport and airline bosses play a different tune. So what does the sector propose to manage its own pollution?

    Not enough cooking oil to save us

    Aviation is a notoriously difficult sector to decarbonise says Richard Sulley, a senior research fellow in sustainability policy at the University of Sheffield: “If electric or hydrogen-powered planes are possible, it won’t be for many years yet.”

    To justify air travel emissions ballooning in the meantime, the aviation sector has promised a mix of “supply-side” measures, like replacing kerosene with so-called “sustainable aviation fuel” (SAF), which Reeves described as “a game changer”, and making planes lighter and more fuel-efficient.

    Efficiency, in this context, is a slippery path to decarbonisation. When a high-emitting activity is reformed so that it consumes less energy, the efficiency savings are generally eclipsed by the increasing demand it drives.




    Read more:
    Expanding Heathrow is incompatible with net zero – here’s the evidence


    “Indeed, the sector’s own plans for growth will outstrip efforts to decarbonise through synthetic fuel, delivering a neutral effect at best,” Sulley says.

    Fuel consumption is the biggest emissions source in aviation.
    Sergey Ginak/Shutterstock

    “Demand-side” measures like fewer flights, taxes on frequent flying and domestic flight bans (see France) could cut emissions, he notes, but are seldom mentioned.

    The UK has set a target for airline fuel to be 10% SAF by 2030. So far we’re at 1.2% – and Sulley reports that the industry has not said how it will scale up in time.

    Even if airlines start taking their commitment to SAF seriously very soon, it’s a dubious solution to aviation’s climate impact according to political economists Gareth Dale (Brunel University) and Josh Moos (Leeds Beckett University).




    Read more:
    Why the world’s first flight powered entirely by sustainable aviation fuel is a green mirage


    Earlier SAF test flights burned coconut oil – 3 million coconuts to power a journey from London to Amsterdam, as Dale and Moos calculate it. At that rate, they argue Heathrow would exhaust the world’s entire crop in a few weeks (there are 18,000 commercial airports worldwide).

    Modern SAF is blended with waste products from farms and kitchens. But the pair argue that the market for used cooking oil is “notoriously unregulated”. SAF may in fact be relabelled palm oil from plantations that are erasing orangutan habitat in the tropics. Again, Dale and Moos argue there is not enough used cooking oil to meet existing, let alone future, demand.

    Transport for the rich, by the rich

    At least the hype around SAF addresses the main problem, albeit misleadingly. Policy experts David Howarth (University of Essex) and Steven Griggs (De Montfort University) marvel at how often “carbon-neutral airports” in aviation sustainability strategies simply mean terminals powered by renewable energy.

    “A terminal’s heating or lighting is, of course, largely irrelevant when its core business is as emissions-intensive as flying,” says Sulley.




    Read more:
    Heathrow 2.0: a ‘sustainable airport’ that pretends no one has to choose between planes and pollution


    Unfortunately for Rachel Reeves, a 2023 report by the New Economics Foundation found that any economic benefits of airport expansion will be largely confined to the airports themselves. Meanwhile, a wealthy subset of UK society can be expected to capture the biggest share of any new flight capacity. Each year, around half of British residents do not fly at all, Sulley points out.

    At the stratospheric heights of that subset are the private jet passengers who are served by “more or less dedicated airports” that are more obscure to the general public, says Raymond Woessner, a geographer at Sorbonne Université. A study published in November found that emissions from these flights rose by 46% between 2019 and 2023. The lead author described wealthy passengers using jets “like taxis”.




    Read more:
    L’insolent succès des jets privés, entre empreinte carbone et controverses


    “Discretion and anonymity” is what one airport nestled in the Oxfordshire countryside promises for “routine celebrity, head of state and royal visits”. Without state direction or regulation, it is these people who are setting the agenda for air travel.

    Woessner notes that the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, successfully lobbied to derail a high-speed rail project in California in 2013. Instead of an option that has shown its ability to cut flight demand, the US will be offered intercontinental rocket travel.




    Read more:
    With planning, high speed rail could reduce flight demand


    Musk’s company SpaceX says that rockets could ferry passengers between New York and Shanghai in under an hour. Rockets would burn “vastly more fuel per trip than conventional aircraft”, says aerospace engineer Angadh Nanjangud of Queen Mary University of London, but this might “drive critical research into carbon-neutral” methane-based rocket fuel.

    It would not be the first time an industry seeking to grow has used an as yet fantastical fuel to justify more carbon in Earth’s atmosphere.




    Read more:
    New York to Paris in 30 mins? How to achieve Elon Musk’s vision of rockets replacing long haul


    “There is the potential to create a good life for all within planetary boundaries,” say Dale and Moos.

    “But getting there requires clipping the wings of the aviation industry.”

    ref. ‘Sustainable’ aviation fuel and other myths about green airport expansion debunked – https://theconversation.com/sustainable-aviation-fuel-and-other-myths-about-green-airport-expansion-debunked-248483

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Video: UK Baroness Hazarika: Lord Speaker’s Corner | House of Lords | Episode 25

    Source: United Kingdom UK House of Lords (video statements)

    From politics to comedy to campaigning against anti-social behaviour, broadcaster Ayesha Hazarika is the latest guest on Lord Speaker’s Corner.

    Baroness Hazarika grew up in Coatbridge, Scotland and is the first person of Indian Assamese heritage to join the House of Lords. She rose to become a senior adviser to Labour figures including Harriet Harman and Ed Miliband, playing a crucial role preparing them for PMQs:

    ‘I think Prime Minister’s Questions gets a very bad rap, because it does often become quite Punch and Judy, but I think it’s a really important function of our democracy. There are not many democracies around the world where the principal politician in the land is called to the same spot week in, week out, and faces questions on any topic from any Member of Parliament across the country.’

    In this episode, Baroness Hazarika talks about her unlikely career path from politics to stand-up comedy and broadcasting, and back to politics. She also explains to Lord McFall how she will use her new political platform to campaign against anti-social behaviour and crime:

    ‘I don’t like calling this low-level crime, because I don’t think it’s low-level crime. But I think this stuff is not easy, but the more we talk about it and the more we press government ministers, that puts the pressure on them to keep on keeping this a priority.’

    Finally, Baroness Hazarika tells Lord McFall about receiving the phone call to offer her a place in the Lords, explaining ‘I really couldn’t believe it, because if you’re somebody like me from my background and you’ve loved politics your whole life, it’s a real honour to be asked to join the House of Lords for the party that you have served and the party you love.’

    She shares that this wasn’t the first thought that went through her head though, saying ‘The person said, “I’m calling on behalf of Keir Starmer. This is really serious. Are you by yourself? I think you better sit down.” And the first thing I thought was, “Oh my goodness, what have I been saying on my social media? Am I about to get cancelled, or am I about to get suspended from the Labour Party? Have I said something terrible?’

    See more from the series https://www.parliament.uk/business/lords/house-of-lords-podcast/

    #HouseOfLords #UKParliament #LordSpeakersCorner #LordsMembers

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlYFCKWBnCo

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Tuberculosis cases in England continued to increase in 2024

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    UK TB cases rise 12.9% in 2024, continuing upward trend.

    The latest provisional annual data from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) shows that reported notifications of tuberculosis (TB) in England increased by 12.9% compared to 2023, continuing the upward trend over the last few years.

    England remains a low-incidence country for TB, but the TB notification rate in England rose from 8.5 per 100,000 population in 2023 to 9.5 per 100,000 in 2024.

    81.5% of all TB notifications in 2024 were in people born outside the UK but there was an increase in both UK-born and non UK-born populations.

    Tuberculosis continues to be associated with deprivation and is more common in large urban areas. The largest increases in TB notifications in 2024 were recorded in London and West Midlands. Among UK-born individuals, TB is more common in those experiencing homelessness, drug or alcohol dependency, and contact with the criminal justice system.

    Dr Esther Robinson, Head of the TB Unit at UKHSA, said:

    TB remains a serious public health issue in England.

    The infection is preventable and curable. If you have moved to England from a country where TB is more common, please be aware of the symptoms of TB so you can get promptly tested and treated through your GP surgery.

    Not every persistent cough, along with a fever, is caused by flu or COVID-19. A cough that usually has mucus and lasts longer than 3 weeks can be caused by a range of other issues, including TB. Please speak to your GP if you think you could be at risk.

    TB is the world’s leading cause of death from a single infectious agent, having surpassed coronavirus (COVID-19). It is a bacterial infection that most frequently affects the lungs, which is when it is infectious.

    Symptoms of TB include:

    • a cough that lasts more than 3 weeks
    • high temperature
    • night sweats
    • loss of appetite
    • weight loss

    TB can also be found in other parts of the body besides the lungs, with symptoms including swollen glands and joints. More information on the symptoms of TB and what to do is available.

    TB can spread through close contact with people who have the infection and have symptoms (active TB). When someone with active TB coughs, they release small droplets containing the bacteria. You can catch TB if you regularly breathe in these droplets over a long period of time. It can be treated with a long course of antibiotics but can be serious, particularly if not treated.

    A TB test for infectious TB in the lungs is part of the visa requirements for anyone coming to stay in the UK for 6 months or more if they are coming from certain countries where TB is common. However, the bacterium that causes TB can also lie dormant for many years – something known as latent TB. To detect people with latent TB infection, a testing and treatment programme is in place in higher incidence areas of England for new arrivals from higher incidence countries.

    Updates to this page

    Published 30 January 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Fire risk! City residents urged to dispose of batteries responsibly

    Source: City of Wolverhampton

    The council has seen an increase in the number of batteries put in household and recycling bins for collection and this can have dangerous consequences.

    Batteries can explode if damaged or crushed, causing fires which burn very quickly due to other waste in the bin and putting everything around them in danger.

    This can cause serious damage to bin lorries, delay collections and put the lives of those in the cab at risk.

    Batteries are found in a wide range of items including vapes, toothbrushes, toys, phones, laptops and even musical greeting cards.

    Residents across Wolverhampton are being urged to please dispose of their batteries correctly to avoid putting people in danger.

    The council’s Household Waste and Recycling Centres (Tips) at Shaw Road and Anchor Lane accept batteries, as do many supermarkets and shops.

    They can also be picked up for free under our small electricals collection service. Batteries need to be placed in a small clear plastic bag, such as a sandwich bag, and put on top of your household waste or recycling bin by 6.30am on your collection day. Bags need to be tied.

    Residents can find out about the service at Small electricals recycling.

    Councillor Bhupinder Gakhal, cabinet member for resident services at City of Wolverhampton Council, said: “This is a very serious issue for our waste crews and one that can be solved by people thinking before they dispose of their batteries, and other items which may contain them.

    “These types of battery fires spread rapidly and can damage refuse vehicles, but more importantly, can threaten the lives of our workers.

    “We need to send out a strong reminder to people of the importance of safe recycling. Please, please dispose of your batteries safely and think of the safety of others.”

    Figures released last year by the National Fire Chiefs Council (NFCC) and the campaign group Recycle Your Electricals showed that battery fires in bin lorries and at waste sites in the UK had reached an all time high.

    More than 1,200 fires were recorded in 2023, an increase of 71% from 700 in 2022. Their research also stated that 6bn batteries were thrown away in the last year, over 3,000 a minute.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI China: Defense Ministry Spokesperson’s Remarks on Recent Media Queries Concerning the Military on January 17, 2025 2025-01-21 The Lai Ching-te administration, in collusion with foreign forces, has been making constant provocations for “Taiwan independence”.

    Source: People’s Republic of China – Ministry of National Defense 2

    On the morning of January 17, 2025, Senior Colonel Wu Qian, Director General of the Information Office of the Ministry of National Defense (MND) and Spokesperson for the MND, answered recent media queries concerning the military.

    Senior Colonel Wu Qian, spokesperson for the Ministry of National Defense (MND) of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), answers recent media queries concerning the military on January 17, 2025. (mod.gov.cn/Photo by Li Xiaowei)

    (The following English text is for reference. In case of any divergence of interpretation, the Chinese text shall prevail.)

    I have one piece of information at the top.

    According to the cooperation plan between the Chinese and French militaries, General Wu Yanan, Commander of the PLA Southern Theatre Command and Rear Admiral Guillaume Pinget, Joint Commander of the French Armed Forces in the Asia-Pacific had a video phone call on the morning of January 17. They had an in-depth exchange of views on issues of common interest.

    Question: After an earthquake struck the city of Rikaze in Xizang, President Xi Jinping made important instructions. The PLA and the PAP are actively involved in rescue and disaster relief efforts. Please share more information on it.

    Wu Qian: On January 7, a 6.8-magnitude earthquake jolted Dingri County in the city of Rikaze in Xizang Autonomous Region and caused heavy casualties. President Xi Jinping attached great importance to the disaster relief work and gave important instructions. He emphasized that every effort be made to search for and rescue survivors, treat the injured, and minimize fatalities.

    Military organs and troops at all levels resolutely implemented the important instructions of President Xi and the CMC, making all out efforts to protect the safety of people’s lives and property and ensure social stability. The CMC Joint Operations Command Center promptly activated the emergency response mechanism and guided the PLA Western Theater Command and PAP troops to organize ground and air forces to effectively carry out rescue operations. As of January 15, the PLA and the PAP had all together deployed 2,055 service members and 869 militia personnel, 20 transport aircraft, helicopters, and unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as 297 sets of vehicles and engineering equipment. They have rescued 27 people, relocated 2,756 people, set up 21 field medical support stations, treated and provided medical service to 22,359 injured, constructed 2,812 tents or portable houses, provided more than 95,000 portions of hot meals, transported disaster relief supplies of over 4,300 tons, and cleared more than 4,700 cubic meters of debris.

    When the people are affected by disasters, the military will come to their rescue. When the military and the people unite, there is no challenge we cannot overcome. The Tibetan for “Hello, PLA” echoing through the earthquake-stricken area reflects the profound bond between the military and the people. Standing together with the people in earthquake-stricken areas, the people’s military put into practice the fundamental mission of serving the people wholeheartedly with concrete actions, and built an unbreakable great wall of steel to protect the people.

    Question: Since the beginning of 2025, the PLA and the PAP have commenced their annual military training, making an all out effort to meet the military’s centenary goal. Please provide more information about this.

    Wu Qian: In 2025, military training will focus on responding to real security threats, enhance training under real combat scenarios, strengthen exercises on joint operations system, and fully leverage the deterring and conflict-preventing functions of military training. We will implement the arrangements made at the on-site meeting on basic training and the on-site meeting on combined training, conduct training in accordance with the new basic training outline, and address challenging issues by extensively conducting cross-service mixed formations training. We will give priority to training on new equipment such as new-type fighter jets, vessels and missiles, actively explore training in emerging fields such as unmanned systems and intelligent technologies, and create new growth points for combat capabilities. We will use more “technology+” and “cyber+” methods to solve training problems and advance innovations in technology-enhanced training. We will continue to carry out joint exercises and training with the armed forces of relevant countries and regions on more subjects, expand the scale of forces, increase joint training time, actively participate in international military sports competitions, and promote in-depth and practical training exchanges and cooperation between China and foreign countries.

    Question: General Liu Zhenli, Chief of the Joint Staff Department of the CMC, led a delegation to visit Malaysia and Indonesia. Please brief us more on the bilateral military relations between China and these two countries.

    Wu Qian: General Liu Zhenli, member of the CMC and Chief of the Joint Staff Department of the CMC, visited Malaysia and Indonesia from January 6 to 12. During the visit, the two sides exchanged views on issues of mutual interest, such as the relations between the two countries and militaries, and international and regional situation. The visit aimed at implementing the important consensus reached between the leaders of China and these two countries, enhance strategic communication, deepen cooperation, and elevate the mil-to-mil relationship to new heights.

    Both Malaysia and Indonesia are friendly neighbors of China across the sea. Under the strategic guidance of President Xi Jinping and the leaders of these two countries, China-Malaysia and China-Indonesia relations have witnessed rapid and comprehensive growth, and started a new chapter of building a community with a shared future. As an important part of bilateral relationship, the mil-to-mil relations have also made positive progress. Sound exchanges and cooperation have been realized in high-level exchanges, joint training and exercises, maritime security, and multilateral coordination under the ASEAN framework. We stand ready to work together with the two militaries to further consolidate strategic mutual trust, strengthen personnel exchanges, extend substantive cooperation, jointly uphold international fairness and justice, work together to implement the Global Security Initiative (GSI) and make joint contributions to peace, stability and prosperity of the region and beyond.

    Question: The first Type 076 amphibious assault ship PLANS Sichuan had its launching and commissioning ceremony recently in Shanghai, which received wide media coverage around the world. According to media of the Taiwan region, the ship has astonishing capabilities for three-dimensional landing operations, and the deployment of the ship would be the most dangerous moment for Taiwan. Some foreign news outlets also claimed that the ship will break regional balance of military power and bring unstable factors. What’s your comment?

    Wu Qian: It is a common practice for countries around the world to develop weapons and equipment in accordance with their national defense requirements. China’s independent development and construction of the Type 076 amphibious assault ship is a normal arrangement consistent with China’s national security needs and the overall development of the PLA Navy. The goal is to safeguard national sovereignty, security and development interests and better protect peace and stability in the region and beyond. The vessel is a new-type amphibious assault ship independently developed by China. It applies electromagnetic catapult and arresting technology, and can carry fixed-wing aircraft, helicopters and amphibious equipment. The ship has strong capabilities for amphibious and far-seas operations. After its launching, the ship will conduct equipment adjustments, mooring trials and sea trials.

    China stays committed to the path of peaceful development and a defense policy that is defensive in nature. The launching of the ship is a normal arrangement in the development of the PLA Navy. It is not targeted at any specific entity, region or country.

    Question: According to media reports, China’s military exchanges with foreign countries witnessed solid progress with many highlights in the year 2024. Please brief us more information.

    Wu Qian: In 2024, officers, soldiers and civilian personnel engaged in military diplomacy carried forward our fine traditions and made innovative efforts in our undertaking, and continued to improve the quality and efficiency of international military cooperation. First, shaping a favorable strategic environment. Staying in line with the directions set by head-of-state diplomacy, the Chinese military maintained close and practical military cooperation with Russia; progressively restored strategic communications and institutionalized dialogues with the US; deepened strategic communications with European countries, and engaged in exchanges with defense authorities and militaries from dozens of other countries. Second, safeguarding national sovereignty and security. We lodged diplomatic representations and released information in a timely way to respond to provocations and violations made by certain countries on the Taiwan question and the South China Sea issue, refuting the wrong words and deeds of relevant parties. Third, expanding multilateral diplomacy. As the host, the Chinese military successfully held the 11th Beijing Xiangshan Forum and the West Pacific Naval Symposium. We also actively participated in multilateral events like the Shangri-La Dialogue and the Defense Ministers’ Meeting of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization to make our voice heard on multilateral stages. Fourth, deepening cooperation on joint training and exercises. For the first time, our troops participated in Exercise Peace Unity in Africa and Exercise Formosa in Brazil, which contributed to regional peace and stability. Fifth, fulfilling the responsibilities of a major country. China’s Blue Helmets (peacekeepers) stayed on their combat posts in war zones; Channel 16 (of the PLAN vessel-protection task forces) remains a code for peace in the Gulf of Aden and waters off the coast of Somalia; the Ark Peace, the PLAN hospital ship provided medical services to people of 13 countries in Asia and Africa; and humanitarian demining courses were organized for Cambodia and Laos. The Chinese military has been taking concrete actions to deliver hope, warmth and strength.

    In the new year, staff for military diplomacy will continuously act on Xi Jinping Thought on Strengthening the Military and Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy in promoting military diplomacy. We will uphold the concept of building a community with a shared future for mankind and go all out to achieve the centenary goal of the PLA.

    Question: According to media reports, the Chinese military’s oxygen supply support system for plateau units has achieved initial results in recent years, effectively meeting the oxygen needs of troops stationed at high altitudes. Please provide more information about this.

    Wu Qian: President Xi and the CMC have always cared for the well-being and health of officers and soldiers stationed on the plateau regions, and have paid close attention to the issue of providing them with adequate oxygen supply. In recent years, we have developed a plateau oxygen supply support system covering large areas, establishing permanent storage points and a tiered distribution network. This system ensures that our troops on the plateau have access to oxygen during routine duties and can carry portable oxygen supplies during mobile operations. The transition from using oxygen solely for life-saving purposes to using it for improving health and conducting operations has significantly decreased the incidence of plateau-related diseases and acute altitude sickness among military personnel.

    First, we have constructed more permanent oxygen production and supply stations, and equipped more oxygen generators to high-altitude units, making oxygen supply available at the soldiers’ bedside. Second, mobile oxygen production facilities, like oxygen-generating cabins, have been deployed to mission areas, effectively overcoming the challenge of sustaining oxygen supply in remote locations. Third, portable individual oxygen supply devices have been issued to to troops, allowing for flexible utilization based on mission requirements. Fourth, we have intensified our efforts in technological innovation, initiating multiple projects for the development of new oxygen production and supply equipment.

    It is cold in the border areas, yet the troops there are full of passion. For a long time, border defense troops stationed on the plateau have guarded the borders in extremely harsh conditions, making great sacrifices for the country and the people. Their dedication to the country will never be forgotten, and their well-being always tugs at the heartstrings of the people.

    Question: It is reported that a naval vessel recently rescued a sick fisherman while performing a mission in the waters of Huangyan Dao. Could you please give us more details about it?

    Wu Qian: Recently, a Chinese fisherman on Qiongqionghai 03003, who was fishing near Huangyan Dao, suddenly suffered from gastric bleeding. The replenishment ship Qinghaihu of the PLA Navy, which was operating in the vicinity, promptly responded and transferred the ailing fisherman aboard for initial medical treatment. It then navigated to waters east of Yongxing Dao, where a rescue helicopter from the Sansha Maritime Search and Rescue Sub-center airlifted the fisherman to the People’s Hospital of Sansha City for further treatment. The fisherman has now been discharged from the hospital and is in stable condition. The Chinese military will continue to protect the safety of the people’s lives and property and contribute to peace and stability in the South China Sea.

    Question: According to the “Taiwan Central News Agency”, Lai Ching-te, leader of the Taiwan region recently said that countries like China and Russia threaten the rule-based international order and undermine peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region and beyond. Therefore, Taiwan needs to continue to raise “defense budget” and enhance “defense capabilities.” What’s your comment?

    Wu Qian: Lai Ching-te and his kind have betrayed their ancestors and what he said was far away from the truth. International documents including the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation have confirmed that the Taiwan region should be returned to China. Such fact is an important part of the post-WWII international order. The victory and outcome of the WWII must be respected and safeguarded. There is no other status of the Taiwan region in the international law than being a part of China.

    The Lai Ching-te administration, in collusion with foreign forces, has been making constant provocations for “Taiwan independence”. It is now the biggest source of chaos that undermines peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and the Asia Pacific. We warn the Lai Ching-te administration and separatists for “Taiwan independence” that any attempt to seek independence by force is just like holding back the tide with a broom, and will eventually lead to self-destruction. Those seeking “Taiwan independence” will never have a good end. The PLA will spare no effort to fight separatism and promote national reunification. We have full confidence that the Taiwan region will return to the motherland and will have a better future after its return.

    Wu Qian: The Chinese Spring Festival of the Year of the Snake is just around the corner. In Chinese tradition, the snake is a symbol of wisdom and vitality It also implies adapability and the conquering of the unyielding with the yielding. As families reunite to bid farewell to the past and embrace the future, I would like to extend warm New Year wishes to you all on behalf of my colleagues. Rest assured that the Chinese military will continue to stand by your side, offering warmth and protection. We will always be the sturdy support you can count on. May our country prosper and our people live in harmony.

    Senior Colonel Wu Qian, spokesperson for the Ministry of National Defense (MND) of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), answers recent media queries concerning the military on January 17, 2025. (mod.gov.cn/Photo by Li Xiaowei)

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Patriotic action “Nevsky landing” started in Polytechnic

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University – Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University –

    A ceremonial assembly was held in the research building of Technopolis Polytech, where the youth patriotic campaign “Nevsky Desant” was launched. The guys performed bright numbers, received vouchers for the season and heard parting words.

    On behalf of the Chairman of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg, Alexander Belsky, the student detachment fighters were greeted by his deputy, Pavel Itkin.

    It is gratifying that the student brigade movement is actively developing in the Northern capital. Participants of the youth patriotic action “Nevsky Desant” make a worthy contribution to the revival of this wonderful tradition. For ten years now, they have been inspiring young men and women of St. Petersburg with their example. And today we see how many caring young people live in our city. I sincerely thank you for your noble work and service to society, – Pavel Itkin read out the address.

    “Nevsky Landing” is a regional stage of the all-Russian patriotic action “Snow Landing”. This year the season of the action is called “Snow Landing of the RSO. Victory Landing” and is dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War. Therefore, special attention will be paid to targeted assistance to WWII veterans, children of war and families of participants in the special military operation, as well as the improvement of memorials and memorable places.

    2025 is the year of the 80th anniversary of the Great Victory, a holiday associated with the movement of student brigades. Those who defended our country and returned home in 1945, already in 1947 went to the construction site as part of the first linear student brigades, which originated in our city, – noted Maxim Pasholikov, Vice-Rector for Youth Policy and Communication Technologies of SPbPU, at the assembly.

    The campaign is rapidly gaining momentum. This year, 29 teams of over 700 people will go to help in the settlements of the Leningrad Region and the Republic of Karelia. Five teams will represent the Polytechnic University. These are “Russian Knight”, “Peter the Great”, “Ilya Muromets”, “Prince Gagarin” and “Evpatiy Kolovrat”.

    From January 24 to February 16, students will conduct career guidance work with schoolchildren, help pensioners, veterans and those in need – remove snow and garbage, chop wood, repair houses. In addition, the fighters will hold creative evenings and concerts for everyone.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Grattan on Friday: Dutton walks more softly on China, with election in mind

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    When Peter Dutton was asked this week  whether a Coalition government would continue  to foster trade relations with China, he declared unequivocally that “the relationship with China will be much stronger  than it is under the Albanese government”.

    Two points stood out: Dutton’s own positive rhetoric, and his apparent confidence about the future of Australia-China relations.

    It’s not unusual for opposition leaders to undertake a makeover, to their person or policy, as an election approaches. Anthony Albanese lost weight and acquired new glasses. Earlier, he’d made Labor a small policy target.

    Dutton is simultaneously attempting a softening on some fronts – while retaining the “hard man” image on others.

    Mid-last year Dutton said: “I’m pro-China and the relationship that we have with them. I want that trading relationship to increase. […] We need to make sure we strengthen the trading relationship because there are many businesses here who rely on it. But we have to be realistic about working to keep peace […] we live in a very uncertain time. The Prime Minister also says that we live in the most precarious period since the Second World War, and he’s right, and we need to work hard at peace as well.”

    Contrast Dutton as defence minister in 2021. “Does the Chinese government wish to occupy other countries? Not in my judgement. But they do see us as tributary states. And that surrender of sovereignty and abandonment of any adherence to the international rule of law is what our country has fought against since Federation.”

    It’s not that Dutton has changed his views on China. Rather, he’s camouflaged them with a softer tone, and in what he chooses to emphasise. Of course circumstances have changed – Australia now has a much better relationship with China. But significantly, Dutton needs to appeal to the local Chinese-Australian voters.

    At the 2022 election, the Liberals took a big hit among voters of Chinese heritage.

    The party’s review of its election performance, undertaken by former party director Brian Loughnane and frontbencher Jane Hume, said: “In the top 15 seats by Chinese ancestry the swing against the Party (on a 2PP basis) was 6.6%, compared to 3.7% in other seats. There are more than 1.2 million people of Chinese heritage living in Australia today. Rebuilding the Party’s relationship with the Chinese community must be a priority during this term of Parliament.”

    Marginal Labor seats that are targets for the Liberals, where the Chinese vote is significant, include Reid and Bennelong in NSW and Chisholm and Aston in Victoria.

    Dutton (and the PM) will attend a Lunar New Year celebration in Box Hill in Melbourne this weekend.

    It’s notable that David Coleman, named by Dutton last weekend as the opposition’s new spokesman on foreign affairs, has worked extensively with the Chinese community. One of the contenders for the post was the high-performing James Paterson. There may have been stronger arguments for keeping Paterson in home affairs, but his very hawkish stand on China might have been in the mix.

    Talking up the positive side of the Coalition’s record on China, Dutton harked back to the signing of the free trade agreement under the Abbott government, and said “we want there to be mutual respect in the relationship”.

    Over its years in government the Coalition’s relationship with China has varied between pragmatic friendship and suspicious negativity. After relatively smooth sailing in the Abbott period, things soured when the Turnbull government called China out over foreign interference, introducing legislation, and banned Huawei from the 5G network. Then relations plunged dramatically when the Morrison government demanded an inquiry into the origins and handling of the outbreak of COVID in Wuhan.

    Despite Dutton’s confidence, it’s more than possible that managing the China relationship after the election could be trickier than it has been during this one, no matter who is in power.

    The Albanese government can claim the greatly-improved bilateral relationship as one of its major foreign policy achievements. China has brought Australia out of the deep freeze, lifting the $20 billion worth of trade barriers it had imposed. Dialogue and ministerial exchanges have resumed. Anthony Albanese has been welcomed in China.

    But this week’s speculation relating to the new Chinese artificial intelligence platform DeepSeek is just the latest reminder of perennial security suspicions about the penetration of Chinese technology.(Incidentally, Dutton has an account on the Chinese-owned TikTok – despite it being banned from official government devices – in part to engage with the local Chinese community, as well as with younger people generally.)

    Australia’s minerals industry is potentially vulnerable to Chinese displeasure. The Senate in the next fortnight will consider the government’s Future Made in Australia legislation, that provides a tax incentive for processing critical minerals. The Chinese have a global stranglehold on this processing – and have shown a willingness to weaponise it, for example against Japan. China’s multi-billion dollar funding of nickel processing in Indonesia has had a dire impact on producers here in Australia.

    The change of government in Australia certainly facilitated the improvement in the bilateral relationship, but that improvement was also strongly driven by China’s own interests. Similarly, the future of the relationship is more in China’s hands than in Australia’s.

    China expert Richard McGregor, from the Lowy Institute, says:“ Relations with China are inherently volatile.

    “The day-by-day relationships have returned to  a degree of normality. But all of the structural stresses which created antagonism are still there.”

    These include China’s “military assertiveness in the region, competition between  the US and China, Australia’s concern about foreign interference and hacking, China’s efforts to build their power in the Pacific at the expense of Australia. None of that has gone away,” McGregor says. The single biggest change of recent years “is that “China has become much more powerful and is far more willing to throw its weight around”.

    Separate to any hiccups in the bilateral relationship, Australia could find itself caught in the crossfire if there is a serious deterioration in the US-China relationship under Donald Trump – notably if his tariff policy leads to a trade war. Simon Jackman, from the University of Sydney, warns that if US policy hit the (already struggling) Chinese economy, that would affect Australian exporters.

    “US tariffs or import bans that slowed China’s economy would cause some short to medium headaches for Australian exporters,” Jackman says. “As in Trump Mark 1 and COVID, Australian export industries would find themselves looking for opportunities elsewhere, if global supply chains had to re-equilibrate in response to an upheaval in the US-China trade relationship.”

    Ironically, the earlier search for diversified markets when the Chinese imposed their restrictions on Australian producers would have helped prepare exporters for such a contingency.

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Grattan on Friday: Dutton walks more softly on China, with election in mind – https://theconversation.com/grattan-on-friday-dutton-walks-more-softly-on-china-with-election-in-mind-248561

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Russia continues to cause immense civilian suffering in Ukraine: UK statement to the OSCE

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Ambassador Holland condemns the civilian suffering caused by Russia’s strikes on Ukrainian energy infrastructure and indiscriminate attacks on cities.

    Thank you, Mr. Chair.  It has been six weeks since the Council last discussed this agenda item.  During these six weeks, regrettably, Russia has continued the same pattern of behaviour we have seen for almost three years.  A pattern of behaviour that is indefensible and inconsistent with Russia’s international commitments, including under the UN Charter, the Geneva Conventions and the Helsinki Final Act.

    On 25 December, a day of significance for many Christians in Ukraine, Russia launched a massive missile attack against energy infrastructure, killing an energy worker, and leaving hundreds of thousands in the Dnipro and Kharkiv regions without heating for days.

    Ukrainians had to endure 13 widescale missile attacks against their energy infrastructure in 2024. Not only has this threatened civilian access to power, water and heating over winter, but by targeting transmission equipment critical to the safe and secure operation of nuclear power plants, Russia has posed serious threats to nuclear safety as well.

    We have already seen the first such attack of 2025, with Russia hitting sites primarily in the west of Ukraine, including gas storage facilities on 15 January.

    The UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Ukraine concluded that these attacks on energy infrastructure constituted the war crime of excessive incidental civilian harm and potentially a crime against humanity.

    It is not just these attacks that raise serious concerns about Russia’s respect for its obligations under international humanitarian law.  The UN has also raised concerns about Russia’s indiscriminate attacks against the civilian population.

    During our recess, on 8 January, a Russian attack in Zaporizhzhia city caused the highest number of civilian casualties from a single incident for almost two years.  Two Russian glide bombs struck a crowd outside an industrial facility, killing 13 civilians and injuring 110.  The UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine said: “It was entirely foreseeable that using such weapons in a city during the day would result in significant civilian casualties … It is hard to see how this attack could be in compliance with the obligation to minimise civilian harm.”

    The UN estimates that there have been more than 30,000 civilian casualties since the Russian state launched its unprovoked war.  Approximately 10,500 killed and more than 20,000 injured.  These are a conservative estimate.  The true figure is likely far higher.

    2024 was a difficult year for Ukraine with attacks against the civilian population and its energy infrastructure.  And Russia has started 2025 in the same vein.  And just as we did in 2024, the UK will stand with Ukraine in 2025 and beyond. This unbreakable bond was formalised earlier this month through the signing of a landmark UK-Ukraine 100 Year Partnership.  We will continue to give political, economic, military and moral support to ensure Ukraine prevails, to secure the lasting peace that the Ukrainian people deserve and the security that our continent demands.  Thank you.

    Updates to this page

    Published 30 January 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: AfDB and WFP support families affected by flooding in Cameroon’s Far North

    Source: World Food Programme

    YAOUNDE –The Government of Cameroon and the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) welcome a US$ 1 million contribution from the African Development Bank (AfDB) to support 42,000 people affected by the 2024 floods in Cameroon’s Far North region.

    “The African Development Bank is steadfast in its commitment to supporting Cameroon’s flood response efforts,” said Serge N’Guessan, African Development Bank Director General for Central Africa Region. “By partnering with the Government and WFP, we ensure that those affected by the floods receive the assistance they need while also setting the stage for long-term recovery.

    Between July and October 2024, devastating floods caused by heavy rains affected over 450,000 people, destroying over 85,000 hectares of farmland and many homes. Over 5,000 livestock also died, the majority in Diamare, Mayo-Danay, Mayo-Kani, Mayo-Tsanaga and Logone-et-Chari divisions. This climate shock exacerbates food insecurity in a region already in the grips of a dire humanitarian situation due to ongoing conflict, population displacements, and rising food prices. Since July 2024, high food prices have soared by 20–30%, leaving many families in rural areas unable to meet their food and nutrition needs.

    With the AfDB funding, WFP in close collaboration with the Government of Cameroon is providing general food distributions comprised of cereals, vegetable oil and salt to the most affected families enabling them to meet their immediate food and nutrition needs for one month.  WFP will also distribute fortified cereal to pregnant women, breastfeeding mothers, and children aged 6 to 59 months to address acute malnutrition.

    “The devastating floods in Cameroon’s Far North Region are a stark reminder of how the impacts of climate change are worsening, sparing no one and calling for a coordinated action,” said Alamine Ousmane Mey, Minister of Economy, Planning and Regional Development. “With support from partners like AfDB, WFP, and other development Partners, we are addressing immediate food needs while paving the way for a resilient recovery. The Government of Cameroon is committed to ensure assistance reaches those in need and prioritizing anticipatory actions to better prepare for future crisis.”

    The Far North region of Cameroon is characterized by high rates of severe acute malnutrition (SAM), reaching 2.9%, exceeding the World Health Organisation emergency threshold of 2%. Chronic malnutrition also remains a concern in the region, with an alarming rate of 49.2% among internally displaced people.

    “WFP is committed to supporting families affected by floods and the growing food insecurity in Cameroon’s Far North Region,” said Gianluca Ferrera, WFP’s Representative and Country Director in Cameroon. “With AfDB’s contribution, many will be reached with lifesaving assistance; however, the scale of the crisis demands more than emergency response”. 

    To ensure continued lifesaving assistance to crisis-affected people in Cameroon through July 2025, WFP requires US$ 48.7 million.

    #           #                #

    About WFP: 

    The United Nations World Food Programme is the world’s largest humanitarian organization saving lives in emergencies and using food assistance to build a pathway to peace, stability and prosperity for people recovering from conflict, disasters, and the impact of climate change.

    Follow us on X, formerly Twitter, via @wfp_media @WFP_Cameroon

    About AfDB:

    The African Development Bank (AfDB), a multilateral development finance institution dedicated to promoting economic development and social progress in Africa, is a long-term partner of its member states, providing unwavering assistance during and aftermath emergencies. Its objectives align with WFP’s goals in Cameroon, focusing on poverty reduction, food security, and sustainable development.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Four diseases you have probably never heard of

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    In the most remote places in the world, people are daily battling diseases that many people may never have heard of. Called neglected tropical diseases, the World Health Organization (WHO) officially recognises 20 such conditions. They’re called neglected diseases because diagnostics and treatments for them are overlooked by governments, pharmaceutical companies, and philanthropists.

    In Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) projects, from South Sudan to Nigeria, and Ethiopia to Honduras, these diseases are hard to neglect. Our teams see how they are distressing, disfiguring, and stigmatising for people who are infected. Here are four neglected tropical diseases we see in communities we serve, and what can be done to prevent, control, eliminate, and eradicate them.

    1. Noma

    In the extreme northwest of Nigeria, an MSF team works with the Ministry of Health at the Sokoto noma hospital – a place where noma patients can receive treatment, reconstructive surgery, and mental health support away from stigma. Noma is a disease that disfigures the people it infects, and it can be fatal for 90 per cent of children who contract it.

    Noma begins as ulcers in the mouth that quickly turn gangrenous, eating away at facial tissue. If antibiotics are used early enough, noma is completely treatable. That’s why our project also focuses on community outreach activities, as awareness and prevention measures.

    Noma is the newest neglected tropical disease recognised by WHO. It was added to the official list in December 2023 after years of advocacy from noma survivors and people who support them. While we hope that the addition of noma to the list will mean more investment into understanding, preventing, and treating the disease, new developments are yet to be seen. Insights into noma will be a game changer for the estimated 140,000 people who are infected every year. 

    2. Schistosomiasis

    Schistosomiasis gets its common name, snail fever, because it is caused by a parasite in snails. These snails live in freshwater, making people who live near lakes and rivers susceptible to the disease. Schistosomiasis is found in tropical and subtropical countries around the world, but in South Sudan, the highest prevalence of the disease is in Jonglei state, where MSF runs a hospital in the remote town of Old Fangak.

    Old Fangak is subject to frequent and extreme flooding, and our teams suspect that many women and girls there are suffering from an advanced form of schistosomiasis, female genital schistosomiasis. Many of the interventions for the disease are preventive, and a vaccine is even in the early stages of development. But this is little comfort for people who have already been infected. People with female genital schistosomiasis have debilitating inflammation, and the disease can turn into cancer. In Old Fangak, we are working to ensure women and girls are accurately diagnosed and provided with the best treatment. 

    3. Visceral leishmaniasis

    Visceral leishmaniasis is also called kala azar (‘black fever’ in Hindi), and is most commonly found in Brazil, across East Africa, and in India. We’ve been treating visceral leishmaniasis for decades in Ethiopia. People infected with this neglected tropical disease will have their tissue attacked by a parasite, which is transmitted through the bites of sandflies. Initial mild symptoms – often mistaken for other diseases – develop into a prolonged fever, enlarged spleen, anaemia, and substantial weight loss. Without treatment, it can quickly become fatal.

    Thankfully, there is a cure. A combination of two drugs injected daily for 17 days can save an infected person’s life. Timely diagnosis and access to the drugs remain a challenge in the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in East Africa, but continued advocacy has made progress in the last few years.

    4. Sleeping sickness

    In the last 25 years, there has been a 97 per cent reduction in the number of people suffering from sleeping sickness, also known as human African trypanosomiasis. This neglected disease, caused by parasites from tsetse fly bites, was eliminated in Equatorial Guinea, Côte d’Ivoire, Benin, Togo, Uganda, and Chad in 2024. Now, Guinea also joins the list of countries that have eliminated sleeping sickness.

    The parasites that cause sleeping sickness attack the brain and spinal cord, leaving infected people to eventually fall into a coma. Without treatment, it’s fatal. Before the 1970s, the only available treatment, derived from arsenic, killed one in 20 people. Today, thanks to the work of our partner organisation Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative, there is a simple and safe oral treatment. 

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Shell’s destructive profiteering is wrecking our planet

    Source: Scottish Greens

    Fossil fuel giants are destroying our climate

    The choices of oil giants like Shell are having a devastating impact on our planet, says the Scottish Greens’ climate spokesperson, Mark Ruskell MSP.

    Mr Ruskell’s comments came as Shell published its profits for 2024.

    Mr Ruskell said:

    “The destructive profiteering and climate-wrecking choices of oil giants like Shell are having a devastating impact on our planet.

    “The focus on fossil fuels has left households across our country with higher bills, a broken energy market and a bleak outlook for future generations.

    “We urgently need to halt the expansion of oil and gas and make a generation-defining national and global investment in clean, green energy.

    “These companies should be investing their profits in a renewable future rather than buying back shares and offering eye-watering dividends.

    “We are sitting on a gold mine of green energy sources here in Scotland, but we won’t see the benefit without fundamental government support. 

    “Leaving fossil fuels in the ground and going green is the only way to secure our future and ensure a liveable planet for generations to come.”

    Mr Ruskell added:

    “The last few years have seen record high temperatures, with extreme weather events becoming even more damaging and even more common.

    “We can’t go on like this. We cannot sit back and allow climate chaos to become our new normal.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Bold action needed to cut number of cars on our roads

    Source: Scottish Greens

    We need to boost public transport.

    Scotland must take bold action if we are to reduce the number of cars on our roads, says the Scottish Greens’ transport spokesperson Mark Ruskell MSP.

    Mr Ruskell’s comments follow the publication of a new report from Audit Scotland warning that the 2030 target for cutting car use is likely to be missed.

    Mr Ruskell said:

    “This must serve as a wakeup call. We urgently need to reduce the number of cars on our roads if we are to have any hope of hitting our climate targets. It won’t happen by itself, it will need bold action to get us there.

    “Part of the challenge is the extortionate cost of transport. By introducing cheaper bus and train fares we can encourage people to make the switch to greener alternatives and to leave their car at home.

    “That’s what we did when the Scottish Greens secured free bus travel for everyone under 22, which has seen over 700,000 young people taking over 150 million free journeys.

    “We also secured the removal of peak rail fares for 12 months, boosting rail travel and saving regular commuters hundreds of pounds. The SNP’s decision to reintroduce peak fares was the wrong decision at the wrong time.

    “If we are to discourage car use in short journeys then we need to make it easier to be green. That means investing in walking, wheeling and cycling infrastructure and boosting local transport options.

    “We all benefit from safer and more accessible streets and cleaner air. I want that for every community in Scotland, and reducing the number of cars is a crucial step to getting there.”

    MIL OSI United Kingdom