NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: housing

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Dog thefts: what really happened during the COVID pandemic

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Daniel Allen, Animal Geographer, Keele University

    smrm1977/Shutterstock

    Dog theft can be a devastating crime. During the COVID pandemic, newspapers suggested there was an epidemic of “dognapping” in the UK. If you have a dog, the reports may have alarmed you at a time when there were already many reasons to feel afraid.

    There are mixed views on whether or not lockdown triggered an increase in dog ownership. Animal welfare charity Battersea attributed a 53% increase in dog adoption to lockdown, and online pet adoption service Pets4Homes said in their 2022 report that demand for puppies rose 104% at the peak of lockdown in May 2020.

    But animal charity PDSA said its survey data pointed to a gradual increase in dog ownership since 2011 rather than a dramatic surge during lockdown. However, we do know lockdown saw inflated prices for dogs, with some fashionable breeds going for £9,000.

    In terms of criminal activity, social distancing restrictions seemed to lead to a decline in some forms of crime, including shoplifting and burglary. But many media outlets reported the number of dog thefts had increased up to 250% during the pandemic.


    Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


    We wanted to explore if the data supported claims of a dognapping epidemic and whether patterns in dog theft could suggest ways to help reduce it. Our recent study found new insights into dog theft patterns and showed the situation was more complicated than it seemed at first glance.

    Under the Theft Act 1968, dog theft is not a specific offence. It comes under other theft offences, such as burglary or theft from a person.

    This means police records on dog theft were not included in crime statistics. The only way to access such information is through Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to individual police forces. There are 45 territorial and three special police forces in the UK, and each has its own reporting and recording practices.

    Although police FOI data for dog theft must be approached with caution, it is useful. Previous studies exploring police FOI data found an upward trend in recorded dog thefts in England and Wales: rising nearly 20% from 2015 (1,545) to 2018 (1,849) for 41 police forces combined; and up 3.5% year on year from 2019 (1,452) to 2020 (1,504) for 33 police forces.

    DogLost, a UK online community for reuniting lost and stolen dogs with their owners, reported a 170% increase in stolen dogs (with Crime Reference Numbers) registered on their website in 2020 (465), compared to 2019 (172). This figure was widely quoted as a national increase “since lockdown started” by the media.

    The 250% increase figure first quoted in December 2020 was actually a comparison of two seven-month periods (January-July 2019 and 2020) for only one police force.

    Patterns and trends

    Our study found the data for the period covering the COVID pandemic is also incomplete. Data was provided by 32 forces (71%) for 2020, by 27 forces (60%) for 2021, and 23 forces (51%) for 2022.

    Patterns and trends do, however, emerge. Between 2020 and 2022, the available data shows a 3.7% rise in dog thefts in the UK, from 1,573 to 1,631. When making adjustments for the number of police forces providing data (which decreased over the period), the estimated national figures suggest there may have been more significant rise of up to 44.2%.

    While we cannot assume that the forces who supplied data are representative of all 45 regional forces, if this were the case, it would equate to 2,212 recorded dog thefts in 2020, 2,645 in 2021, and 3,191 in 2022.

    There was a lot of variation between different areas. For example, Cambridgeshire, Gwent and Northumbria police forces experienced increases of 36%, 49% and 80% respectively in the number of recorded dog thefts between 2020 and 2021.

    Monthly analysis of data from regional police forces and DogLost, show that the number of reports of stolen dogs started to go up when the UK entered its first national lockdown and again during part of the third lockdown. But the average number of police-recorded dog thefts was actually slightly higher outside of lockdown periods than during them between 2020 and 2022.

    However, in contrast with police trends, DogLost data shows a 65.2% drop in dogs reported stolen on DogLost’s website in 2022 compared to 2020. Lower DogLost numbers may reflect limited visibility or presence of their networks, the use of alternative lost and stolen dog services, or reluctance to share personal details online due to scams targeting dog theft victims.

    Dogs are often stolen from inside their own homes.
    GoodFocused/Shutterstock

    Our study found that, overall, there probably was an increase in dog theft from
    2020 to 2022, following already identified increases in the preceding years. This rise was probably driven by a combination of opportunity (more dogs, higher value) and situational factors (accessibility, dogs unattended in gardens while owners were inside).

    Our evidence does not support the notion of a widespread epidemic as portrayed by the media. However, increased media interest probably amplified awareness of the issue, and influenced the creation of the Pet Theft Taskforce, a UK government initiative set up in May 2021 to investigate and tackle dog thefts.

    New research appears to confirm the idea that dog abduction has significant welfare effects on both dogs and their owners. We also know that few dog thefts are successfully resolved, with under a quarter of stolen dogs likely to be returned and around 1%-5% of reported dog thefts result in someone being charged.

    However, there is potential good news. Our ongoing research suggests the number of police-recorded dog thefts decreased slightly in 2023, and again in 2024. This is supported by research from pet insurer Direct Line, which has estimated a 21% decrease in the number of stolen dogs from 2,290 in 2023 to 1,808 in 2024 in the UK.

    Daniel Allen is founder of Pet Theft Reform and patron of the Stolen and Missing Pets Alliance (Sampa).

    Melanie Flynn is a member of the Research Advisory Committee of the Vegan Society (UK).

    John Walliss does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Dog thefts: what really happened during the COVID pandemic – https://theconversation.com/dog-thefts-what-really-happened-during-the-covid-pandemic-252061

    MIL OSI –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Sylvia Plath’s ‘fig tree analogy’ from The Bell Jar is being misappropriated

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Elisha Wise, English, University of Sheffield

    In chapter seven of Sylvia Plath’s The Bell Jar (1963), protagonist Esther Greenwood imagines her life branching out before her like a green fig-tree. Each individual fig on the branches represents a different “wonderful future” – a family, a successful career, romance, travel, fame, etc.

    High-achieving Esther has innumerable figs she can choose from, yet she envisages herself “starving to death” in the crook of the tree because she can’t make up her mind on which of the figs she should choose.

    Her indecision stems from the knowledge that choosing one wonderful future means losing out on the other, equally appealing opportunities. She wants to experience all of them, but knows she cannot, and, in the end, spends so long deciding that every single fig rots and falls to the ground, dead.

    By wanting to do everything, Esther misses her chance to do anything at all. This is a metaphor about wasted potential, fears of choosing the wrong pathway, and feeling rushed into making decisions before you truly know what you want. There is little wonder that it appeals to teenagers.

    The “fig tree analogy”, as it is known online, is beloved by gen Z and has become a TikTok staple over the last three years. It was first discussed on the platform as part of the 2023 “Roman Empire” meme, with female users citing it as an example of something they constantly think about.

    It then reached a new peak in early 2024 thanks to the “my fig tree” trend, in which users (again, predominantly young women) wrote future hopes and dreams onto a stock image of a fig branch in videos featuring accompanying audio of the passage being read aloud.


    Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here.


    This trend was, in essence, a way for people to share their dream jobs – with career pathways as varied as “surgeon” and “influencer” sometimes appearing on a single branch. But it also allowed young users to express their anxieties about planning for the future.

    In one video, “I can’t help but wonder if I’m going to be truly happy in [my chosen career] forever” is written beside a beautifully illustrated fig tree. I remember feeling this way myself when I read The Bell Jar for the first time in the middle of university applications and big life choices.

    When you are young, it can feel like you have only one choice and can never remake it, which is why Plath’s words spoke to me then and seem to be speaking to hundreds now.

    But why exactly is this metaphor resonating so strongly with gen Z?

    The girls who are participating in the “my fig tree” trend are not subject to the same binary choice of marriage or career that Esther faced. It is now possible to have loads of lovers and then a husband and family, and neither disqualifies you from also being a “brilliant professor” or “amazing editor” or anything else you wish to be.

    In The Bell Jar, Plath treats these things as distinct because they would truly have felt that way in Esther’s time of enforced purity and nuclear families. She was, after all, writing pre-second-wave feminism.

    So why, in our fourth-wave feminist world, do women still feel their options are so narrow? It could be because women workers are disproportionately at risk of being displaced by AI, or because other TikTok sensations like the “trad wife” are promoting to young women the very purity culture that Plath rallied against.

    Perhaps, for this generation, it really seems urgent to grasp hold of one fig before all are lost.

    However, as the “fig tree analogy” goes more and more viral, it is at risk of being removed from its original context. The signs of this are already visible on TikTok, as the passage has in the last month been used to soundtrack #romanticisinglife content and promote fig-themed homeware at a garden centre.

    It was also referenced in a recent episode of reality dating show Love Island, where it was incorrectly named the “fig theory” and not attributed to Plath.

    All of this suggests that the passage has now reached an audience of people who have not read The Bell Jar and see the analogy more as some generic life wisdom than a literary device. Indeed, TikTok videos by self-styled philosophers encouraging watchers to pick any or every fig off the tree instead of being paralysed by indecision like Esther are gaining traction.

    While these may prove helpful to Zoomers unsure about their future pathway, I feel that the conversation around this metaphor is increasingly overlooking the fact that Esther is unable to choose a fig because she is depressed.

    The real meaning of the fig tree analogy

    The Bell Jar may be a novel about coming of age as a woman, but it’s also, at its core, the story of a woman having a breakdown. In the pages preceding the “fig tree analogy”, Esther calls herself “dreadfully inadequate” and claims that “I was only purely happy until I was nine years old”.

    So, in the context of the novel, the metaphor can be read as a product of depressive thinking. It is not meant to be a universal truth.

    Instead, it represents the subjective thoughts of a narrator who feels herself a failure, despite her plentiful opportunities, because she is mentally ill. Turning Plath’s prose into a theory or philosophy or meme minimises its darker aspects, particularly as the popular TikTok audio that accompanies “fig tree analogy” videos often cuts off before the figs fall, due to the app’s preference for short content.

    Some users may well have participated in the “my fig tree” trend without even realising that the quotation ends with Esther losing everything.

    Perhaps it should be concerning so many young people relate to a narrator who becomes so overwhelmed by her conflicting ambitions that she attempts to kill herself. I certainly wonder how Plath would feel about her words now being treated as emblematic of a collective female experience. If nothing else, I am sure she would be disappointed at how little has changed in 60 years.


    This article features references to books that have been included for editorial reasons, and may contain links to bookshop.org. If you click on one of the links and go on to buy something from bookshop.org The Conversation UK may earn a commission.

    Elisha Wise will receive funding from the White Rose College of Arts and Humanities (ARCH) from October 2025.

    – ref. Sylvia Plath’s ‘fig tree analogy’ from The Bell Jar is being misappropriated – https://theconversation.com/sylvia-plaths-fig-tree-analogy-from-the-bell-jar-is-being-misappropriated-261597

    MIL OSI –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Defense News in Brief: General Guetlein to Lead the Office of Golden Dome for America

    Source: United States Department of Defense

    Golden Dome is President Donald J. Trump’s vision to build a layered defense of the homeland to provide for the common defense of the American people against ballistic, hypersonic, advanced cruise missiles and other next-generation aerial attacks from near-peer and rogue nations.  

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Secretary-General’s remarks on Climate Action “A Moment of Opportunity: Supercharging the Clean Energy Age” [as delivered; scroll down for All-French]

    Source: United Nations secretary general

    Excellencies,

    Ladies and gentlemen,

    Friends joining us from around the world,  

    The headlines are dominated by a world in trouble. 

    By conflict and climate chaos.

    By rising human suffering.

    By growing geo-political divides.

    But amidst the turmoil, another story is being written.

    And its implications will be profound.

    Throughout history, energy has shaped the destiny of humankind – from mastering
    fire, to harnessing steam, to splitting the atom.

    Now, we are on the cusp of a new era. 

    Fossil fuels are running out of road.

    The sun is rising on a clean energy age.

    Just follow the money.

    $2 trillion went into clean energy last year – that’s $800 billion more than fossil fuels, and up almost 70% in ten years.

    And new data released today from the International Renewable Energy Agency shows that solar – not so long ago four times the cost of fossil fuels – is now 41% cheaper.

    Offshore wind – 53%.

    And over 90% of new renewables worldwide produced electricity for less than the cheapest new fossil fuel alternative.

    This is not just a shift in power.  This is a shift in possibility.

    Yes, in repairing our relationship with the climate.

    Already, the carbon emissions saved by solar and wind globally are almost equivalent to what the whole European Union produces in a year.

    But this transformation is fundamentally about energy security and people’s security.

    It’s about smart economics.

    Decent jobs, public health, advancing the Sustainable Development Goals. 

    And delivering clean and affordable energy to everyone, everywhere.

    Today, we are releasing a special report with the support of UN agencies and partners — the International Energy Agency, the IMF, IRENA, the OECD and the World Bank.

    The report shows how far we have come in the decade since the Paris Agreement sparked a clean energy revolution.  And it highlights the vast benefits – and actions needed – to accelerate a just transition globally.

    Renewables already nearly match fossil fuels in global installed power capacity.

    And that’s just the beginning. 

    Last year, almost all the new power capacity built came from renewables. 

    And every continent on Earth added more renewables capacity than fossil fuels.

    The clean energy future is no longer a promise.  It’s a fact. 

    No government.  No industry.  No special interest can stop it. 

    Of course, the fossil fuel lobby of some fossil fuel companies will try – and we know the lengths to which they will go.

    But I have never been more confident that they will fail – because we have passed the point of no return.  

    For three powerful reasons. 

    First, market economics.

    For decades, emissions and economic growth rose together.

    No more.

    In many advanced economies, emissions have peaked, but growth continues.

    In 2023 alone, clean energy sectors drove 10% of global GDP growth.

    In India, 5%.  The United States, 6%. China – a leader in the energy transition – 20%.

    And in the European Union, nearly 33%.

    And clean energy sector jobs now outnumber fossil fuel jobs – employing almost 35 million people worldwide.

    Even Texas – the heart of the American fossil fuel industry – now leads the US in renewables.

    Why?  Because it makes economic sense.

    And yet fossil fuels still enjoy a 9 to 1 advantage in consumption subsidies globally – a clear market distortion. 

    Add to that the unaccounted costs of climate damages on people and planet – and the distortion is even greater.

    Countries that cling to fossil fuels are not protecting their economies – they are sabotaging them.

    Driving up costs.

    Undermining competitiveness.

    Locking-in stranded assets.

    And missing the greatest economic opportunity of the 21st century.

    Excellencies,
    Dear friends,

    Second — renewables are here to stay because they are the foundation of energy security and sovereignty.

    Let’s be clear:  The greatest threat to energy security today is in fossil fuels.

    They leave economies and people at the mercy of price shocks, supply disruptions, and geopolitical turmoil. 

    Just look at Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.  

    A war in Europe led to a global energy crisis.

    Oil and gas prices soared.

    Electricity and food bills followed.
     
    In 2022 average households around the world saw energy costs jump 20%. 

    Modern and competitive economies need stable, affordable energy.  Renewables offer both.

    There are no price spikes for sunlight.

    No embargoes on wind.

    Renewables can put power – literally and figuratively – in the hands of people and governments.

    And almost every nation has enough sun, wind, or water to become energy self-sufficient.

    Renewables mean real energy security.  Real energy sovereignty. And real freedom from fossil-fuel volatility.

    Dear friends,

    The third and final reason why there is no going back on renewables:  Easy access.

    You can’t build a coal plant in someone’s backyard.

    But you can deliver solar panels to the most remote village on earth.

    Solar and wind can be deployed faster, cheaper and more flexibly than fossil fuels ever could.

    And while nuclear will be part of the global energy mix, it can never fill the access gaps.

    All of this is a game-changer for the hundreds of millions of people still living without electricity – most of them in Africa, a continent bursting with renewable potential.

    By 2040, Africa could generate 10 times more electricity than it needs – entirely from renewables.   

    We are already seeing small-scale and off-grid renewable technologies lighting homes, and powering schools and businesses in remote areas.

    And in places like Pakistan for example, people-power is fueling a solar surge – consumers are driving the clean energy boom. 

    Excellencies,
    Dear friends,

    The energy transition is unstoppable.

    But the transition is not yet fast enough or fair enough. 

    OECD countries and China account for 80% of renewable power capacity installed worldwide.

    Brazil and India make up nearly 10%.

    Africa — just 1.5%.

    Meanwhile, the climate crisis is laying waste to lives and livelihoods.

    Climate disasters in small island states have wiped out over 100% of GDP. 

    In the United States, they are pushing insurance premiums through the roof. 

    And the 1.5 degree limit is in unprecedented peril.

    To keep it within reach, we must drastically speed up the reduction of emissions – and the reach of the clean energy transition.

    With manufacturing capacity racing, prices plummeting, and COP30 fast approaching…

    This is our moment of opportunity.

    We must seize it.

    We can do so by taking action in six opportunity areas.  

    First – by using new national climate plans to go all-out on the energy transition. 

    Too often, governments send mixed messages:

    Bold renewable targets on one day.  New fossil fuel subsidies and expansions the next. 

    The next national climate plans, or NDCs, are due in a matter of months.

    They must bring clarity and certainty.

    G20 countries must lead.  They produce 80% of global emissions. 

    The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities must apply but every country must do more.

    Ahead of COP30 in Brazil this November, they must submit new plans.

    I invite leaders to present their new NDCs at an event I will host in September, during General Assembly High-level week. These must:

    Cover all emissions, across the entire economy.

    Align with the 1.5 degree limit.

    Integrate energy, climate and sustainable development priorities into one coherent vision.

    And deliver on global promises:

    To double energy efficiency and triple renewables capacity by 2030.

    And to accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels.

    These plans must be backed by long-term roadmaps for a just transition to net-zero energy systems – in line with global net-zero by 2050.

    And they must be underpinned by policies that show that the clean energy future is not just inevitable – but investable. 

    Policies that create clear regulations and a pipeline of projects.

    That enhance public-private partnerships – unlocking capital and innovation.

    That put a meaningful price on carbon.

    And that end subsidies and international public finance for fossil fuels – as promised. 

    Second, this is our moment of opportunity to build the energy systems of the 21st century. 

    The technology is moving ahead.   

    In just fifteen years, the cost of battery storage systems for electricity grids has dropped over 90%. 

    But here’s the problem. 

    Investments in the right infrastructure are not keeping up. 

    For every dollar invested in renewable power, just 60 cents go to grids and storage. 

    That ratio should be one-to-one. 

    We are building renewable power – but not connecting it fast enough.

    There’s three times more renewable energy waiting to be plugged into grids than was added last year.

    And fossil fuels still dominate the global total energy mix.

    We must act now and invest in the backbone of a clean energy future:

    In modern, flexible and digital grids – including regional integration.

    In a massive scale-up of energy storage.

    In charging networks – to power the electric vehicle revolution.

    On the other hand we need energy efficiency but also  electrification — across buildings, transport and industry.

    This is how we unlock the full promise of renewables – and build energy systems that are clean, secure and fit for the future.

    Third, this is our moment of opportunity to meet the world’s surging energy demand sustainably.

    More people are plugging in.

    More cities are heating up – with soaring demand for cooling.

    And more technologies – from AI to digital finance – are devouring electricity.

    Governments must aim to meet all new electricity demand with renewables.

    AI can boost efficiency, innovation, and resilience in energy systems. And we must take profit in it.

    But it is also energy-hungry.

    A typical AI data-center eats-up as much electricity as 100,000 homes.

    The largest ones will soon use twenty times that. 

    By 2030, data centres could consume as much electricity as all of Japan does today.

    This is not sustainable – unless we make it so.

    And the technology sector must be out front.

    Today I call on every major tech firm to power all data centres with 100% renewables by 2030.

    And – along with other industries – they must use water sustainably in cooling systems.

    The future is being built in the cloud.

    It must be powered by the sun, the wind, and the promise of a better world.  

    Excellencies
    Dear friends,

    Fourth, this is the moment of opportunity for a just energy transition.

    The clean energy that we must deliver  must also deliver equity, dignity and opportunity for all.

    That means governments leading a just transition.

    With support, education and training – for fossil fuel workers, young people, women, Indigenous Peoples and others – so that they can thrive in the new energy economy.

    With stronger social protection – so no one is left behind. 

    And with international cooperation to help low-income countries that are highly-dependent on fossil fuels and struggling to make the shift.

    But justice doesn’t stop here.

    The critical minerals that power the clean energy revolution are often found in countries that have long been exploited.

    And today, we see history repeating. 

    Communities mistreated.

    Rights trampled.

    Environments trashed.

    Nations stuck at the bottom of value chains – while others reap rewards.

    And extractive models digging deeper holes of inequality and harm.

    This must end.

    Developing countries can play a major role in diversifying sources of supply. 

    The UN Panel on Critical Energy Transition Minerals has shown the way forward – with a path grounded in human rights, justice and equity.

    Today, I call on governments, businesses and civil society to work with us to deliver its recommendations.

    Let’s build a future that is not only green – but just.

    Not only fast – but fair. 

    Not only transformative – but inclusive.

    Fifth, we have a moment of opportunity to use trade and investment to supercharge the energy transition.

    Clean energy needs more than ambition.

    It needs access – to technologies, materials, and manufacturing.

    But these are concentrated in just a few countries.

    And global trade is fragmenting.

    Trade policy must support climate policy.

    Countries committed to the new energy era must come together to ensure that trade and investment drive it forward.

    By building diverse, secure, and resilient supply chains.

    By cutting tariffs on clean energy goods.

    By unlocking investment and trade – including through South-South cooperation.

    And by modernizing outdated investment treaties – starting with Investor-State Dispute Settlement provisions.

    Today, fossil fuel interests are weaponizing these provisions to delay the transition, particularly in several developing countries.

    Reform is urgent.

    The race for the new must not be a race for the few.

    It must be a relay – shared, inclusive and resilient.

    Let’s make trade a tool for transformation. 

    Sixth and finally, this is our moment of opportunity to unleash the full force of finance – driving investment to markets with massive potential.

    Despite soaring demand and vast renewables potential — developing countries are being locked out of the energy transition.

    Africa is home to 60% of the world’s best solar resources.  But it received just 2% of global clean energy investment last year.

    Zoom out, and the picture is just as stark. 

    In the last decade, only one in every five clean energy dollars went to emerging and developing countries outside China.

    To keep the 1.5 degree limit alive — and deliver universal energy access – annual clean energy investment in those countries must rise more than fivefold by 2030. 

    That demands bold national policies.  And concrete international action to: 

    Reform the global financial architecture.

    Drastically increase the lending capacity of multilateral development banks — making them bigger, bolder, and better able to leverage massive amounts of private finance at reasonable costs;

    And take effective action on debt relief – and scale up proven tools like debt for climate swaps. 

    Today, developing countries pay outlandish sums for both debt and equity financing – in part because of outdated risk models, bias and broken assumptions that boost the cost of capital.

    Credit ratings agencies and investors must modernize.
     
    We need a new approach to risk that reflects:

    The promise of clean energy.

    The rising cost of climate chaos.

    And the danger of stranded fossil fuel assets.

    I urge parties to unite to solve the complex challenges facing some developing countries in the energy transition – such as early retirement of coal plants. 

    Excellencies,
    Dear friends,

    The fossil fuel age is flailing and failing.

    We are in the dawn of a new energy era.

    An era where cheap, clean, abundant energy powers a world rich in economic opportunity.

    Where nations have the security of energy autonomy.

    And the gift of power is a gift for all.

    That world is within reach.

    But it won’t happen on its own.

    Not fast enough.

    Not fair enough.

    It is up to us. 

    We have the tools to power the future for humanity.   

    Let’s make the most of them. 

    This is our moment of opportunity. 

    And I Thank you.

                                                                                                                                                                                                  ****
    [All-French]

    Excellences,

    Mesdames et Messieurs,

    Chers amis présents avec nous depuis le monde entier,

    L’actualité est dominée par les maux de la planète.

    Par les conflits et le chaos climatique.

    Par la multiplication des souffrances humaines.

    Par des dissensions géopolitiques croissantes.

    Mais au milieu de cette tourmente, autre chose est en train de se jouer.

    Quelque chose qui aura de profondes répercussions.

    Tout au long de l’histoire, l’énergie a présidé aux destinées de l’humanité
    – du feu à l’atome, en passant par la vapeur.

    Aujourd’hui, nous entrons dans une ère nouvelle.

    Les énergies fossiles sont en bout de course.

    Nous sommes à l’aube d’une ère des énergies propres.

    Il suffit d’observer les flux financiers.

    L’année dernière, 2 000 milliards de dollars ont été investis dans les énergies propres : c’est 800 milliards de dollars de plus que pour les énergies fossiles et cela représente une hausse de près de 70 % en 10 ans.

    Et de nouvelles données publiées aujourd’hui par l’Agence internationale pour les énergies renouvelables montrent que l’énergie solaire, qui était quatre fois plus chère que les énergies fossiles il y a peu de temps encore, est aujourd’hui 41 % moins chère.

    L’éolien en mer – 53 % moins cher.

    Et le coût de l’électricité produite par plus de 90 % des nouvelles énergies renouvelables dans le monde est inférieur au coût du nouveau combustible fossile le moins cher.

    C’est un tournant. Non seulement sur le plan énergétique, mais aussi du point de vue des possibilités qui s’offrent à nous.

    Car oui, nous pouvons assainir notre rapport au climat.

    Les énergies solaire et éolienne permettent d’ores et déjà d’économiser au niveau mondial une quantité d’émissions de carbone presque équivalente à l’ensemble des émissions annuelles de l’Union européenne.

    Mais plus fondamentalement, il y va de la sécurité énergétique et de la sécurité des personnes.

    De la gestion avisée de l’économie.

    Des emplois décents, de la santé publique et de la réalisation des objectifs de développement durable.

    Et de la capacité de mettre à la disposition des populations du monde entier une énergie propre et abordable.

    Aujourd’hui, nous publions un rapport spécial avec le soutien d’organismes des Nations Unies et d’organisations partenaires – l’Agence internationale de l’énergie, le Fonds monétaire international, l’Agence internationale pour les énergies renouvelables, l’Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques et la Banque mondiale.

    Ce rapport illustre le chemin parcouru au cours de la décennie écoulée, depuis que l’Accord de Paris a ouvert la voie à une révolution de l’énergie propre. Il montre que nous avons beaucoup à gagner d’une transition rapide et juste à l’échelle mondiale, pour peu que nous prenions les mesures voulues.

    Au niveau mondial, la puissance installée des énergies renouvelables est déjà presque comparable à celle des énergies fossiles.

    Et ce n’est qu’un début.

    L’année dernière, la quasi-totalité de l’énergie fournie par les nouvelles capacités de production était renouvelable.

    Sur tous les continents, on a créé plus de capacités de production d’énergie provenant de sources renouvelables que provenant de combustibles fossiles.

    Les sources d’énergie renouvelable ont généré près d’un tiers de l’électricité mondiale.

    L’énergie propre n’est plus une promesse d’avenir. C’est une réalité.

    Aucun gouvernement, aucune industrie, aucun intérêt particulier ne saurait l’arrêter.

    Bien entendu, le lobby des combustibles fossiles de certaines entreprises s’y emploiera, et nous savons jusqu’où il peut aller.

    Mais – j’en ai désormais la certitude – tous ses efforts sont voués à l’échec, car il est trop tard pour revenir en arrière.

    Il y a trois raisons de poids à cela.

    Premièrement, les marchés.

    Pendant des décennies, l’augmentation des émissions est allée de pair avec celle de la croissance économique.

    Ce n’est plus le cas.

    Dans de nombreuses économies avancées, les émissions plafonnent, mais l’économie continue de croître.

    Rien qu’en 2023, le secteur de l’énergie propre a contribué à hauteur de 10 % à la croissance du PIB mondial.

    En Inde, 5 %. Aux États-Unis, 6 %. En Chine – l’un des leaders de la transition énergétique –, 20 %.

    Et dans l’Union européenne, près de 33 %.

    Et le secteur des énergies propres emploie désormais 35 millions de personnes dans le monde, soit plus que le secteur des énergies fossiles.

    Même le Texas, cœur de l’industrie fossile américaine, est aujourd’hui le premier producteur d’énergies renouvelables aux États-Unis.

    Pourquoi ? Parce que c’est une question de bon sens économique.

    Et ce, en dépit d’une distorsion manifeste du marché au profit des énergies fossiles, qui bénéficient de subventions à la consommation neuf fois plus importantes que les renouvelables au niveau mondial.

    Si l’on ajoute à cela le coût non comptabilisé des dommages subis par les populations et la planète à cause des changements climatiques, la distorsion est encore plus marquée.

    Les pays qui s’accrochent aux énergies fossiles ne protègent pas leur économie, ils la sabotent.

    Ils poussent les coûts à la hausse.

    Ils freinent leur compétitivité.

    Ils se condamnent à avoir des actifs bloqués.

    Et ils passent à côté de la plus grande promesse économique du XXIe siècle.

    Excellences, Chers amis,

    En deuxième lieu, les énergies renouvelables sont promises à un bel avenir, car elles sont au cœur de la sécurité et de la souveraineté énergétiques.

    Disons-le clairement : les combustibles fossiles constituent aujourd’hui la plus grande menace pour la sécurité énergétique.

    Ils laissent les économies et les populations à la merci des variations de prix, des ruptures d’approvisionnement et des turbulences géopolitiques.

    C’est ce que l’on a vu lors de l’invasion de l’Ukraine par la Russie.

    Une guerre en Europe a entraîné une crise énergétique mondiale.

    Les cours du pétrole et du gaz ont grimpé en flèche.

    Et les factures d’électricité et les dépenses alimentaires leur ont emboîté le pas.
     
    En 2022, les ménages ont vu leurs dépenses énergétiques augmenter de 20 % en moyenne dans le monde.

    Les économies modernes et compétitives ont besoin d’un approvisionnement énergétique stable, à un prix abordable. Les énergies renouvelables permettent d’avoir les deux.

    La lumière du soleil n’est pas sujette aux flambées de prix.

    Le vent ne peut être soumis à aucun embargo.

    En leur fournissant de l’électricité, les énergies renouvelables peuvent mettre le pouvoir entre les mains des citoyens et des États.

    Or, presque tous les pays ont suffisamment de soleil, de vent ou d’eau pour devenir autosuffisants sur le plan énergétique.

    Les énergies renouvelables sont la solution pour une véritable sécurité énergétique. Une véritable souveraineté énergétique. Et une véritable protection contre la volatilité associée aux combustibles fossiles.

    Chers amis,

    Troisième et dernière raison pour laquelle les énergies renouvelables sont désormais incontournables : la facilité d’accès.

    On ne peut pas construire une centrale à charbon au fond d’un jardin.

    Mais on peut installer des panneaux solaires dans le village le plus isolé de la planète.

    Le solaire et l’éolien peuvent être déployés plus rapidement, plus facilement, et pour moins cher que les énergies fossiles ne pourront jamais l’être.

    Et bien que le nucléaire soit amené à faire partie du bouquet énergétique mondial, il ne pourra jamais résorber les inégalités d’accès.

    Tout cela change la donne pour les centaines de millions de personnes qui vivent encore sans électricité, pour la plupart en Afrique, continent qui regorge de sources d’énergies renouvelables inexploitées.

    À l’horizon 2040, l’Afrique pourrait avoir une production d’électricité 10 fois supérieure à ses besoins, uniquement grâce au renouvelable.

    Déjà, des dispositifs autonomes de production d’énergie renouvelable à petite échelle servent à éclairer des maisons et à alimenter des écoles et des entreprises dans les zones reculées.

    Et dans des pays comme le Pakistan, le solaire s’impose grâce à l’impulsion des citoyens : ce sont les consommateurs qui sont à l’origine du boom des énergies propres.

    Excellences, Chers amis,

    Rien ne peut arrêter la transition énergétique.

    Mais cette transition n’est encore ni assez rapide ni assez équitable.

    Les pays de l’OCDE et la Chine représentent 80 % de la capacité de production d’énergie renouvelable installée dans le monde.

    Le Brésil et l’Inde, près de 10 %.

    L’Afrique, seulement 1,5 %.

    Pendant ce temps, des vies et des moyens de subsistance sont anéantis par la crise climatique.

    Dans certains petits États insulaires, les catastrophes climatiques ont coûté plus de 100 % du PIB.

    Aux États-Unis, elles font exploser les primes d’assurance.

    Et la limite de 1,5 degré devient plus que jamais un vœu pieux.

    Pour que cet objectif reste à notre portée, nous devons au plus vite réduire les émissions et étendre l’envergure de la transition vers les énergies propres.

    Les capacités de production se multiplient, les prix chutent et la COP30 approche à grands pas.

    Nous nous trouvons donc à un moment décisif.

    Ne le laissons pas passer.

    Le moment est venu d’agir dans six domaines porteurs.

    Premièrement, nous devons saisir l’occasion de faire des nouveaux plans climatiques nationaux le moteur d’une transition énergétique irréversible.

    Trop souvent, les gouvernements envoient des messages contradictoires :

    Un jour, des objectifs ambitieux en matière d’énergies renouvelables. Le lendemain, de nouvelles subventions aux combustibles fossiles et des mesures qui favorisent leur expansion.

    Les prochains plans d’action nationaux sur le climat – également connus sous le nom de contributions déterminées au niveau national – doivent être présentés dans quelques mois.

    Ils devront être source de clarté et de certitude.

    Les pays du G20 doivent être à la manœuvre. Ils sont responsables de 80 % des émissions mondiales.

    Le principe des responsabilités communes mais différenciées doit être appliqué, mais tous les pays doivent redoubler d’effort.

    En prévision de la COP30, qui se tiendra au Brésil en novembre, ils doivent présenter de nouveaux plans.

    J’invite les dirigeants à présenter leurs nouvelles contributions déterminées au niveau national lors d’une manifestation que j’organiserai en septembre, durant la semaine de haut niveau de l’Assemblée générale. Ces contributions devront :

    Couvrir toutes les émissions, dans tous les secteurs de l’économie.

    Ne pas dépasser la limite de 1,5 degré.

    Se fonder sur une approche cohérente intégrant les priorités liées à l’énergie, au climat et au développement durable.

    Et tenir les promesses qui ont été faites au niveau mondial, à savoir :

    Multiplier par deux l’efficacité énergétique et par trois les capacités en énergies renouvelables d’ici à 2030.

    Et accélérer l’abandon progressif des combustibles fossiles.

    Ces plans devront être assortis de feuilles de route à long terme permettant d’assurer une transition équitable vers des systèmes énergétiques à zéro émission nette, conformément à l’objectif fixé pour 2050.

    Et ils doivent s’accompagner de politiques qui montrent qu’un avenir alimenté par des énergies propres est inéluctable et mérite d’être soutenu par des investissements.

    Des politiques qui instaurent un cadre réglementaire clair et favorisent l’émergence d’un vivier de projets.

    Qui renforcent les partenariats public-privé en mobilisant des capitaux et en stimulant l’innovation.

    Qui assurent la tarification effective du carbone.

    Et qui marquent la fin des subventions et des financements publics internationaux destinés aux combustibles fossiles – comme promis.

    Deuxièmement, nous devons saisir l’occasion de bâtir les systèmes énergétiques du XXIe siècle.

    La technologie progresse.

    En l’espace de quinze ans seulement, le coût des systèmes de stockage par batterie pour réseaux électriques a chuté de plus de 90 %.

    Mais il y a un problème.

    Les investissements dans les infrastructures nécessaires ne suivent pas.

    Pour chaque dollar investi dans les énergies renouvelables, 0,6 dollar seulement est consacré aux réseaux et au stockage.

    Le rapport devrait être d’un pour un.

    Nous produisons de l’énergie renouvelable, mais nous ne l’intégrons pas assez vite aux réseaux.

    La quantité d’énergie renouvelable en attente de raccordement est trois fois supérieure à celle effectivement mise en service l’an dernier.

    Et le bouquet énergétique mondial reste dominé par les combustibles fossiles.

    Nous devons agir dès maintenant et investir dans l’architecture d’un avenir placé sous le signe des énergies propres.

    Dans des réseaux modernes, souples et informatisés – ainsi que dans l’intégration régionale.

    Dans une augmentation massive de la capacité de stockage d’énergie.

    Dans les réseaux de recharge – pour alimenter la révolution des véhicules électriques.

    D’un autre côté, nous avons besoin l’efficacité énergétique et l’électrification dans les secteurs du bâtiment, des transports et de l’industrie.

    C’est ainsi que nous tirerons pleinement parti des possibilités offertes par les énergies renouvelables et que nous bâtirons des systèmes propres, sûrs et adaptés au monde de demain.

    Troisièmement, nous devons saisir l’occasion de répondre durablement à l’augmentation de la demande énergétique mondiale.

    De plus en plus de personnes sont raccordées aux réseaux.

    De plus en plus de villes se réchauffent, ce qui entraîne une hausse de la demande de climatisation.

    Et de plus en plus de technologies – de l’intelligence artificielle à la finance numérique – consomment une quantité d’électricité colossale.

    Pour répondre à l’augmentation de la demande d’électricité, les gouvernements doivent privilégier le renouvelable.

    L’intelligence artificielle peut rendre les systèmes énergétiques plus efficaces, plus innovants et plus résilients.

    Mais elle est aussi extrêmement énergivore.

    Un centre de données IA typique engloutit autant d’électricité que 100 000 foyers.

    Bientôt, les plus grands centres consommeront 20 fois plus.

    D’ici à 2030, ils pourraient utiliser autant d’électricité que l’ensemble de la population japonaise actuelle.

    Cette situation n’est pas viable – et c’est à nous d’y remédier.

    Le secteur de la technologie doit montrer la voie.

    Aujourd’hui, je demande à toutes les grandes entreprises technologiques de faire en sorte que tous leurs centres de données fonctionnent aux énergies renouvelables d’ici à 2030.

    Elles doivent également veiller – tout comme d’autres secteurs – à utiliser durablement l’eau nécessaire aux systèmes de refroidissement.

    L’avenir se construit dans le nuage.

    Il doit être alimenté par le soleil, le vent et la promesse d’un monde meilleur.

    Excellences, Chers amis,

    Quatrièmement, nous devons saisir l’occasion d’assurer une transition énergétique juste.

    L’ère de l’énergie propre doit garantir l’équité et la dignité et ouvrir de nouvelles perspectives pour l’humanité tout entière.

    Cela signifie que les gouvernements doivent prendre les rênes d’une transition juste.

    En assurant l’accompagnement, l’éducation et la formation des personnes qui travaillent pour l’industrie fossile, des jeunes, des femmes, des peuples autochtones et d’autres, afin qu’ils puissent prospérer dans une économie reposant sur les énergies nouvelles.

    En assurant une meilleure protection sociale pour que personne ne soit laissé pour compte.

    Et en renforçant la coopération internationale en vue d’aider les pays à faible revenu qui sont largement tributaires des combustibles fossiles et pour lesquels la transition est difficile.

    Mais la justice ne se limite pas à cela.

    Les minéraux critiques qui alimentent la révolution des énergies propres se trouvent souvent dans des pays qui ont longtemps été exploités.

    Aujourd’hui, nous voyons l’histoire se répéter.

    Des populations malmenées.

    Leurs droits bafoués.

    Leur environnement saccagé.

    Des nations reléguées aux échelons inférieurs des chaînes de valeur, tandis que d’autres en accaparent le produit.

    Et des modèles d’extraction qui creusent encore les inégalités et amplifient les dégradations.

    Il faut que cela cesse.

    Les pays en développement peuvent jouer un rôle majeur dans la diversification des sources d’approvisionnement.

    Le Groupe chargé de la question des minéraux critiques pour la transition énergétique a défini une trajectoire ancrée dans le respect des droits humains, de la justice et de l’équité.

    Aujourd’hui, je demande aux gouvernements, aux entreprises et à la société civile de se joindre à nous pour mettre en œuvre ses recommandations.

    Bâtissons un avenir qui soit respectueux de l’environnement et fondé sur l’équité.

    Qui advienne rapidement et soit guidé par le principe de justice.

    Qui soit porteur de transformation et favorise l’inclusion.

    Cinquièmement, nous devons saisir l’occasion de mettre le commerce et l’investissement au service de l’accélération de la transition énergétique.

    L’ambition seule ne suffira pas à assurer le passage à une énergie propre.

    Il faut aussi des technologies, des matériaux et des minéraux critiques.

    Mais ces éléments sont concentrés dans quelques pays seulement.

    Et le commerce mondial se fragmente.

    La politique commerciale doit soutenir l’action climatique.

    Les pays mobilisés en faveur d’une nouvelle ère énergétique doivent unir leurs forces pour lui donner corps grâce au commerce et à l’investissement.

    En diversifiant les chaînes d’approvisionnement et en les rendant plus sûres et plus résilientes.

    En abaissant les droits de douane sur les biens nécessaires à la production d’énergie propre.

    En débloquant les investissements et en renforçant les échanges, notamment dans le cadre de la coopération Sud-Sud.

    Et en actualisant des traités d’investissement dépassés, à commencer par les dispositions relatives au règlement des différends entre investisseurs et États.

    À l’heure actuelle, le secteur des combustibles fossiles instrumentalise ces dispositions pour retarder la transition, en particulier dans plusieurs des pays en développement.

    Une réforme s’impose d’urgence.

    La course à l’innovation ne doit pas être réservée à une minorité privilégiée.

    Il doit s’agir d’une course de relais – collective, inclusive et source de résilience.

    Faisons du commerce un outil de transformation.

    Sixièmement, nous devons saisir l’occasion d’exploiter toute la puissance de la finance en dirigeant les investissements vers des marchés à très fort potentiel.

    Malgré une demande en forte hausse et un potentiel indéniable en matière d’énergies renouvelables, les pays en développement sont exclus de la transition énergétique.

    L’Afrique abrite 60 % des meilleures ressources solaires au monde. Mais elle n’a comptabilisé que 2 % des investissements mondiaux dans les énergies propres au cours de l’année écoulée.

    En élargissant le cadre, on obtient un tableau tout aussi alarmant.

    Au cours des dix dernières années, seul un dollar sur cinq consacré à l’énergie propre est allé à des pays émergents ou en développement autres que la Chine.

    Si nous voulons contenir le réchauffement à 1,5 degré et assurer un accès universel à l’énergie, les investissements annuels dans les énergies propres doivent être multipliés par plus de cinq dans ces pays d’ici à 2030.

    Cela exige de prendre des mesures audacieuses à l’échelon national, mais aussi de mener une action concrète au niveau mondial pour :

    Réformer l’architecture financière internationale.

    Renforcer considérablement la capacité de prêt des banques multilatérales de développement, afin qu’elles gagnent en envergure et en audace et soient plus à même de canaliser des flux massifs de capitaux privés à un coût raisonnable.

    Et prendre des mesures efficaces en matière d’allégement de la dette, notamment en intensifiant le recours à des outils éprouvés tels que la conversion de dettes en mesures en faveur du climat.

    À l’heure actuelle, les pays en développement paient des sommes exorbitantes pour accéder à des financements par emprunt et par prise de participation, en partie à cause de modèles de risque obsolètes, de préjugés et d’hypothèses erronées qui accroissent considérablement le coût du capital.

    Les agences de notation et les investisseurs doivent moderniser leurs pratiques.
     
    Il nous faut une nouvelle approche du risque qui tienne compte :

    Du potentiel des énergies propres.

    Du coût croissant du chaos climatique.

    Et du danger associé aux actifs fossiles échoués.

    Je demande instamment aux parties de s’atteler ensemble à régler les problèmes complexes auxquels se heurtent certains pays en développement dans le cadre de la transition énergétique, notamment la mise hors service anticipée des centrales à charbon.

    Excellences, chers amis,

    L’ère des combustibles fossiles est à bout de souffle et en bout de course.

    Nous sommes à l’aube d’une nouvelle ère énergétique.

    Une ère dans laquelle une énergie abondante, propre et peu coûteuse viendra alimenter un monde riche en perspectives économiques.

    Où la sécurité énergétique des nations sera assurée.

    Et où l’énergie sera un bien universel.

    Ce monde est à notre portée.

    Mais cela ne se fera pas tout seul.

    Pas assez rapidement.

    Pas assez équitablement.

    C’est à nous de prendre les choses en main.

    Nous disposons des outils nécessaires pour doter l’humanité de l’énergie de demain.

    Utilisons-les à bon escient.

    Nous ne devons pas laisser passer ce moment.

    Je vous remercie.
     

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Vasilin Terkin

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    The Moscow State Historical and Ethnographic Theatre invites you to a performance based on the poem by Alexander Tvardovsky. The audience will see episodes of military life with all its difficulties, difficult choices, fear, small joys, hope and dream of a peaceful life. The role of Vasily Terkin will be played by several actors at once.

    Director Mikhail Mizyukov sees in Tvardovsky’s work not just a chronicle of everyday life in war, but a story built according to the laws of Russian popular prints. The stage laconically combines the original Russian and the Soviet, the plausible and the fantastic, the comic and the tragic, the heroic and the lyrical. The entire canvas of the play is permeated with soldiers’ folklore – songs about the hardships of service and longing for home, perky ditties, daring dances, wise proverbs and sayings.

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Onfolio Holdings’ AI Marketing Subsidiary Showcases “How to 10X Your Traffic from ChatGPT” Exploring Generative Engine Optimization

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WILMINGTON, Del., July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Onfolio Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: ONFO, ONFOW) (OTC: ONFOP) (“Onfolio” or the “Company”) announces that its wholly owned subsidiary, Pace Generative LLC, recently partnered with ThriveCart to deliver a live webinar on the emerging field of Generative Engine Optimization (GEO).

    ThriveCart, a leading online checkout and sales platform trusted by thousands of entrepreneurs and businesses, invited Pace Generative to educate its user base through a free webinar titled “How to 10X Your Traffic from ChatGPT.” The session was led by Onfolio’s CEO Dom Wells and drew strong interest, attracting close to 200 live attendees, underscoring the growing demand for GEO insights and solutions.

    Pace Generative is rapidly establishing itself as a thought leader and innovator in the AI visibility space, helping brands capitalize on exposure through platforms like ChatGPT and Google’s AI Overviews.

    A full replay of the webinar is available for free on ThriveCart’s YouTube channel at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PQDWAGTXC9E

    About Pace Generative LLC

    Pace Generative helps brands increase their visibility and traffic from AI answer engines, such as Google AI overviews, ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Grok. By using traditional content marketing, SEO, and PR techniques, along with new proprietary methods, the Pace team helps optimize businesses for generative engine optimization (GEO). For more information, visit www.pacegenerative.com.

    About ThriveCart

    ThriveCart is the leading sales platform for digital course creators, coaches, entrepreneurs, and online businesses looking to boost revenue, drive conversions, and scale audiences. ThriveCart powers 60,000 businesses that have generated over $6 billion in lifetime sales. For more information, visit www.thrivecart.com.

    About Onfolio Holdings Inc.

    Onfolio acquires, operates, and scales a diversified portfolio of digital companies. The Company focuses on businesses with strong cash flows, long-term growth potential, and experienced leadership—or those that can be effectively managed by Onfolio’s in-house team. By targeting under-optimized businesses with untapped potential, Onfolio adds value through operational expertise, strategic guidance, and advanced technologies. For more information, visit www.onfolio.com.

    Safe Harbor Statement

    The information posted in this release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You can identify these statements by use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “plans,” “explores,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “continues,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” and similar expressions. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements we make regarding expected operating results, such as revenue growth and earnings, and strategy for growth and financial results. Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include, among others, the following: general economic and business conditions, effects of continued geopolitical unrest and regional conflicts, competition, changes in technology and methods of marketing, delays in completing new customer offerings, changes in customer order patterns, changes in customer offering mix, continued success in technological advances and delivering technological innovations, delays due to issues with outsourced service providers, those events and factors described by us in Item 1.A “Risk Factors” in our most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Q and other risks to which our Company is subject, and various other factors beyond the Company’s control. Any forward-looking statement made by us in this press release is based only on information currently available to us and speaks only as of the date on which it is made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

    Company Contact:
    Investor Communications
    Onfolio Holdings Inc.
    Investors@Onfolio.com

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: AutoScheduler Receives Investment from Ben Gordon, Founder of Cambridge Capital LLC

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    AUSTIN, Texas, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — AutoScheduler.AI, a leader in Agentic AI Warehouse Orchestration, announces receiving a strategic investment from Benjamin Gordon, a leading investor in logistics and supply chain technology companies. This investment marks a significant milestone in AutoScheduler’s continued growth and commitment to transforming warehouse orchestration through Agentic AI.

    “Ben Gordon brings unmatched expertise in logistics technology and a proven track record of scaling high-growth supply chain innovators,” says Keith Moore, CEO of AutoScheduler.AI. “Ben understands that we’re entering a new era in warehousing, where Agentic AI enables proactive, intelligent decision-making across operations, driving speed, agility, and performance. This strategic partnership will help us accelerate our roadmap, enhance customer outcomes, and bring Agentic AI warehouse orchestration to even more enterprises.”

    “In a world where disruptions are the norm, companies need intelligent, responsive systems that can orchestrate warehouse operations in real time and AutoScheduler delivers exactly that and more,” says Benjamin Gordon. “We are impressed with the team, technology, and leadership at the company and look forward to supporting their continued growth.”

    Benjamin Gordon is Managing Partner of Cambridge Capital, an investor in niche supply chain leaders. He is also Managing Partner of BGSA Holdings LLC (BGSA), an investment banking firm focused on the supply chain industry. Prior to founding BGSA, Ben founded 3PLex and led strategy projects in transportation and technology at Mercer Management consulting. Ben received a Masters in Business Administration from Harvard Business School and a Bachelor of Arts degree from Yale College.

    AutoScheduler continues to partner with global brands seeking to modernize warehouse operations and boost efficiencies and productivity within the warehouse environment. The investment will support AutoScheduler’s continued expansion, including enhancements to its product suite, growth of its leadership and engineering teams, and increased go-to-market efforts. Previous investments & follow on investments were also made by core AutoScheduler partners Noro-Moseley Partners and Blue Impact LLC.

    About AutoScheduler.AI
    AutoScheduler.AI empowers your supply chain with its Agentic AI-based warehouse orchestration platform that integrates with your existing WMS/LMS/YMS or any other solution to drive value across the supply chain by improving throughput, cutting labor costs, and ensuring customer service goals are met. AutoScheduler automates critical tasks for the warehouse like labor scheduling, task sequencing, and dock management, ensuring everything runs smoothly and efficiently. Our Agentic AI-based platform makes better decisions to create an adaptive, living supply chain. For more information, visit: http://www.AutoScheduler.AI.

    About Cambridge Capital
    Cambridge Capital is a leading investment firm focused on the supply chain sector. Based in West Palm Beach, FL, the firm invests in high-growth companies in logistics, transportation, and supply chain technology. Learn more at www.cambridgecapital.com.

    Contact:
    Becky Boyd
    MediaFirst PR
    Becky@MediaFirst.Net
    Cell: (404) 421-8497

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Gaza not a religious issue – it’s a massive violation of international law, say accord critics

    Asia Pacific Report

    Groups that have declined to join the government-sponsored “harmony accord” signed yesterday by some Muslim and Jewish groups, say that the proposed new council is “misaligned” with its aims.

    The signed accord was presented at Government House in Auckland.

    About 70 people attended, including representatives of the New Zealand Jewish Council, His Highness the Aga Khan Council for Australia and New Zealand and the Jewish Community Security Group, reports RNZ News.

    The initiative originated with government recognition that the consequences of Israel’s actions in Gaza are impacting on Jewish and Muslim communities in Aotearoa, as well as the wider community.

    While agreeing with that statement of purpose, other Muslim and Jewish groups have chosen to decline the invitation, said some of the disagreeing groups in a joint statement.

    They believe that the council, as formulated, is misaligned with its aims.

    “Gaza is not a religious issue, and this has never been a conflict between our faiths,” Dr Abdul Monem, a co-founder of ICONZ said.

    ‘Horrifying humanitarian consequences’
    “In Gaza we see a massive violation of international law with horrifying humanitarian consequences.

    “We place Israel’s annihilating campaign against Gaza, the complicity of states and economies at the centre of our understanding — not religion.

    “The first action to address the suffering in Gaza and ameliorate its effects here in Aotearoa must be government action. Our government needs to comply with international courts and act on this humanitarian calamity.

    “That does not require a new council.”

    The impetus for this initiative clearly linked international events with their local impacts, but the document does not mention Gaza among the council’s priorities, said the statement.

    “Signatories are not required to acknowledge universal human rights, nor the courts which have ruled so decisively and created obligations for the New Zealand government. Social distress is disconnected from its immediate cause.”

    The council was open to parties which did not recognise the role of international humanitarian law in Palestine, nor the full human and political rights of their fellow New Zealanders.

    ‘Overlooks humanitarian law’
    Marilyn Garson, co-founder of Alternative Jewish Voices said: “It has broad implications to overlook our rights and international humanitarian law.

    “As currently formulated, the council includes no direct Palestinian representation. That’s not good enough.

    “How can there be credible discussion of Aotearoa’s ethnic safety — let alone advocacy for international action — without Palestinians?

    “Law, human rights and the dignity of every person’s life are not opinions. They are human entitlements and global agreements to which Aotearoa has bound itself.

    “No person in Aotearoa should have to enter a room — especially a council created under government auspices — knowing that their fundamental rights will not be upheld. No one should have to begin by asking for that which is theirs.”

    The groups outside this new council said they wished to live in a harmonious society, but for them it was unclear why a new council of Jews and Muslims should represent the path to harmony.

    “Advocacy that comes from faith can be a powerful force. We already work with numerous interfaith community initiatives, some formed at government initiative and waiting to really find their purpose,” said Dr Muhammad Sajjad Naqvi, president of ICONZ.

    Addressing local threats
    “Those existing channels include more of the parties needed to address local threats, including Christian nationalism like that of Destiny Church.

    “Perhaps government should resource those rather than starting something new.”

    The groups who declined to join the council said they had “warm and enduring relationships” with FIANZ and Dayenu, which would take seats at this council table.

    “All of the groups share common goals, but not this path,” the statement said.

    ICONZ is a national umbrella organisation for New Zealand Shia Muslims for a unified voice. It was established by Muslims who have been born in New Zealand or born to migrants who chose New Zealand to be their home.

    Alternative Jewish Voices is a collective of Aotearoa Jews working for Jewish pluralism and anti-racism. It supports the work of Palestinians who seek liberation grounded in law and our equal human rights.

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Langworthy Leads ZIP Code Fix for Pendleton and Wheatfield

    Source: US Congressman Nick Langworthy (NY-23)

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – Congressman Nick Langworthy announced that the U.S. House of Representatives has passed the bipartisan ZIP Code Act, H.R. 3095, legislation he proudly cosponsored and helped advance through the House Oversight Committee in partnership with Congresswoman Lauren Boebert. The bill now moves to the Senate for consideration.

    The legislation directs the U.S. Postal Service to assign unique ZIP codes to more than 65 underserved communities across the country—including the Towns of Pendleton and Wheatfield in Western New York.

    For decades, Pendleton and Wheatfield have shared ZIP codes with neighboring municipalities—leading to misdirected mail, delayed deliveries, inaccurate sales tax distribution, inflated insurance rates, and slower emergency response times.

    “This has been a long-standing problem that’s impacted nearly every household and business in Pendleton and Wheatfield,”said Congressman Langworthy.“I made it a top priority to fix it. Now that the House has passed this bill, we’re one step closer to giving these communities the recognition, reliability, and services they deserve.”

    Langworthy is calling on the Senate to act swiftly and deliver long-overdue relief to these growing Western New York towns.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Reaction to Sizewell C deal: too expensive, too slow 

    Source: Green Party of England and Wales

    22 July 2025 by Green Party

    Commenting on news that the Government has struck a deal with private investors to progress the Sizewell C nuclear power plant in Suffolk – a deal in which the government will have a 45% stake – co-leader of the Green Party and Waveney Valley MP, Adrian Ramsay, said:   

    “The tax-payer will pick up nearly half of the estimated £38bn bill for Sizewell C but see not a single watt of electricity from it for at least a decade. Bill-payers will also have to stump up the cash for this plant through an increase in their energy bills by around £12 a year.  

    “New nuclear is a vastly more expensive way to produce electricity than renewables, with electricity from Sizewell C estimated to cost around £170 per megawatt hour compared to offshore wind at around £89/MWh. Hinkley C has also shown how the costs of developing nuclear power plants mushroom and are beset by endless delays.  

    “The billions of our money being squandered on this nuclear gamble would be far better spent on insulating and retrofitting millions of homes, which would bringing down energy bills and keep people warm in winter and cool in summer. We should also be investing in genuinely green power such as fitting millions of solar panels to roofs, and in innovative technologies like tidal power. All this would create many more jobs than nuclear ever will and deliver clean electricity much more quickly.” 

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Food lifeline fading for millions in South Sudan hit by conflict and climate shocks

    Source: United Nations 2

    Earlier this month, the UN agency began airdropping emergency food assistance in Upper Nile State after surging conflict forced families from their homes and pushed communities to the brink of famine.

    Nationwide, the picture is just as alarming, with half the country’s population – more than 7.7 million people – officially classified as food insecure by UN partner the IPC platform. This includes more than 83,000 face “catastrophic” levels of food insecurity.

    “The scale of suffering here does not make headlines but millions of mothers, fathers, and children are spending each day fighting hunger to survive,” said WFP Deputy Executive Director Carl Skau, following a visit to South Sudan last week. 

    The worst-hit areas include Upper Nile State, where fighting has displaced thousands and relief access is restricted. Two counties are at risk of tipping into famine: Nasir and Ulang.

    South Sudan, the world’s youngest country, gained independence in 2011. This gave way to a brutal and devastating civil war which ended in 2018 thanks to a peace agreement between political rivals which has largely held.

    However, recent political tensions and increased violent attacks – especially in the Upper Nile State – threaten to unravel the peace agreement and return the nation to conflict.

    The humanitarian emergency crisis has been exacerbated by the war in neighbouring Sudan. 

    Since April 2023, nearly 1.2 million people have crossed the border into South Sudan, many of them hungry, traumatised, and without support. WFP says that 2.3 million children across the country are now at risk of malnutrition.

    Crucial, yet fragile gains

    Despite these challenges, the UN agency has delivered emergency food aid to more than two million people this year. In Uror County, Jonglei State, where access has been consistent, all known pockets of catastrophic hunger have been eliminated. Additionally, 10 counties where conflict has eased have seen improved harvests and better food security, as people were able to return to their land.

    To reach those in the hardest-hit and most remote areas, WFP has carried out airdrops delivering 430 metric tons of food to 40,000 people in Greater Upper Nile. River convoys have resumed as the most efficient way to transport aid in a country with limited infrastructure. These included a 16 July shipment of 1,380 metric tons of food and relief supplies. WFP’s humanitarian air service also continues flights to seven Upper Nile destinations.

    At the same time, a cholera outbreak in Upper Nile has placed additional pressure on the humanitarian response. Since March, WFP’s logistics cluster has airlifted 109 metric tons of cholera-related supplies to affected areas in Upper Nile and Unity states.

    However, the UN agency says it can currently support only 2.5 million people – and often with just half-rations. Without an urgent injection of $274 million, deeper cuts to aid will begin as soon as September.

    “WFP has the tools and capacity to deliver,” said Mr. Skau. “But without funding – and without peace – our hands are tied.” 

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: Stronger pipeline pact spans three provinces

    [. The MOU also calls for new rail lines to connect critical mineral deposits located in Ontario’s Ring of Fire region to ports in Western Canada.

    The agreement reinforces joint efforts to push back against federal policies that block nation-building projects in order to collectively advance pipelines, rail, transmission infrastructure and other major projects across Canada’s energy, mining and manufacturing sectors.

    This includes significantly amending or repealing the Impact Assessment Act, as well as repealing the Oil Tanker Moratorium Act, Clean Electricity Regulations, the Oil and Gas Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cap, and all other federal initiatives that discriminately impact the energy sector and sectors such as mining and manufacturing. Taking action will ensure Alberta, Ontario and Saskatchewan can attract the investment and project partners needed to get shovels in the ground, grow industries and create jobs.

    “We’re taking action to grow our economy, build real infrastructure and get major projects moving. Alberta is proud to lead the way in uniting with provinces that share a vision for responsible development, economic freedom and common sense. We’re standing up for our oil and gas sector and making sure our world-class resources reach the markets that need them. Together, Alberta, Ontario and Saskatchewan are showing what’s possible when provinces step up. This agreement is about building a stronger, more connected Canada, one project at a time.”

    Danielle Smith, Premier of Alberta

    “As the world grapples with President Trump’s unfair tariffs, it’s more important than ever to build a resilient and self-reliant economy here at home. This agreement sends a clear message: Ontario, Alberta and Saskatchewan are ready to get shovels in the ground and move forward on projects that will secure our long-term prosperity.”

    Doug Ford, Premier of Ontario

    “We are sending a clear signal that Canada’s energy future will be built by Canadians, for Canadians. This agreement commits our provinces to work together to unlock new markets, shore up our supply chains from mine to port, and advocate for the federal reforms our industry needs. By advancing pipelines, rail connections and critical-mineral processing capacity, we are safeguarding thousands of jobs, strengthening our energy security, and fostering sustainable growth.”

    Scott Moe, Premier of Saskatchewan

    This agreement builds on the foundations of the MOU recently signed by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith and Ontario Premier Doug Ford at the Calgary Stampede to strengthen interprovincial trade, drive major infrastructure development, and grow Canada’s global competitiveness through energy and trade infrastructure.

    By signing this new agreement Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario are demonstrating what it takes to keep Canada competitive in a changing world.

    Quick facts

    • Premiers Danielle Smith and Doug Ford signed two MOUs on July 7, 2025, to prioritize building pipelines, rail and infrastructure between the two provinces, as well as to bolster interprovincial trade of alcohol and vehicles between the provinces.
    • On June 1, 2025, Premiers Smith and Ford signed an MOU to improve the free flow of goods and services between the two provinces.

    Related information

    • Leading the way on interprovincial trade

    Related news

    • Alberta-Ontario MOUs fuel more pipelines and trade (July 7, 2025)
    • Next stop for free trade: Ontario! (June 1, 2025)

    Multimedia

    • Watch the news conference

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Online finance portal launched to make it easier for people to assess paid-for care costs

    Source: City of Stoke-on-Trent

    Published: Tuesday, 22nd July 2025

    A 24/7 online financial assessment service has been launched for residents looking to access paid-for adult social care in Stoke-on-Trent.

    The Online Financial Assessment tool – which can be found at www.stoke.gov.uk/ascfinance – will help people estimate the contributions they need to make towards a variety of care needs – such as residential, nursing and home care.

    It will also help them work out their eligibility to have their paid-for support part or fully funded.

    The portal can be used by existing clients – or a family member, friend or other person representing them – to assess ongoing costs, as well as those looking to make an initial financial assessment.

    The seven-day-a-week service also allows people to submit relevant documents, such as bank statements, to help calculate their assessment and work out support eligibility. 

    It is the fourth portal launched by the council’s Adult Social Care team in the last few months – the Carers Portal, Bettercare Support Portal and Professional Portal are also available 24/7 to make accessing services, support and signposting better than ever before.

    The aim of all four is to help people lead the most independent lives they possibly can by tapping into the right amount of support, whatever their circumstances.

    Councillor Duncan Walker, cabinet member for adult social care and all-age commissioning at Stoke-on-Trent City Council, said: “This is an extremely useful online tool that will provide much-needed financial assessment support to those looking to access paid-for care.

    “We know that going into a residential care home or arranging care at home can be a stressful time in a person’s life, as well affecting their family and close friends, so we want to make this process as quick and easy as possible.

    “This also offers a convenient option for people who’s prefer to do it online and at a time of their choosing.”  

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Two more Plymouth schools to make Safer School Streets permanent

    Source: City of Plymouth

    Two more Plymouth schools will be making their ‘Safer School Streets’ schemes permanent after the summer holiday, following successful 18-month trials.

    The schemes see roads closed to school-run and through traffic during morning and afternoon drop-off and pick-up times, improving safety for everyone, making it easier for families to walk, cycle or scoot to school and creating a healthier street environment with cleaner air.

    Stuart Road Primary Academy was the first to run an extended trial of the restrictions before making them permanent last year. It will now be joined by Compton CofE Primary and St Paul’s RC Primary, where the measures have made a significant change to the way families travel to school.

    At Compton, surveys and counts carried out by Sustrans and the Council’s road safety team showed the number of children being driven to school fell by 34 per cent after the scheme was put in place and there was a 60 per cent increase in children using the Pearn Road crossing. St Paul’s reported a “huge drop in parked vehicles in Barne Lane”.

    Councillor John Stephens, Cabinet Member for Strategic Planning and Transport, said: “It’s great to see another two schools making their Safer School Streets schemes permanent. This shows how effective the measures can be in tackling inconsiderate and dangerous parking and making school journeys safer. They also help to reduce congestion and improve air quality around the school gates, as well as encourage active travel.

    “We work hard to encourage families to leave the car at home where possible and promote active travel (including schemes such as walk and stride and walking buses). Making sure local roads and footways are safe and accessible is a huge part of this.

    Every weekday during term time, roads outside each school are closed with temporary barriers during their morning and afternoon school run times.

    • St Paul’s (Barne Lane): 8.15am to 9am and 2.30pm to 3.30pm
    • Compton (Pearn Road and Pearn Gardens): 8.15am to 9.15am and 2.45pm to 3.45pm

    There will be no changes to these timings.

    Families are encouraged to walk, cycle or scoot to school or, if they need to drive to work, to ‘park and stride’ – where they park a five or 10 minute walk from the school and go the rest of the way by foot.

    Access is maintained for local residents and businesses, parents and children with disabilities, the emergency services, deliveries and other service vehicles.

    The measures have been trialled for 18 months under an Experimental Traffic Regulation Order. The permanent Traffic Regulation Order has been advertised in the local press and on street and the school community and local residents are being made aware.

    The decision to make the scheme permanent was signed on 25 June and can be viewed on our decisions page.

    For more information visit our Safer School Streets page or the School Streets website.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Summertime fun is child’s play with Breeze In The Park

    Source: City of Leeds

    Organised by Leeds City Council, the roadshow-style programme will see a total of 26 low-cost play days taking place in local communities over the next month.

    Each event will be held in a different park or green space and will feature interactive activities such as arts, crafts, sports and games together with Breeze’s much-loved giant inflatables.

    The programme gets under way tomorrow (Wednesday, July 23) at Belle Isle’s Coopers Field and will finish at Wortley Recreation Ground on August 21.

    In between times, events will take place in Armley, Beeston, Bramhope, Bramley, Burmantofts, Cross Gates, Drighlington, East Ardsley, East End Park, Farsley, Garforth, Harehills, Horsforth, Kirkstall, Middleton, Morley, Otley, Potternewton, Pudsey, Rothwell, Seacroft, Tinshill, Woodhouse and Yeadon.

    The visits to Armley, Beeston, Bramhope, Cross Gates, East Ardsley, East End Park, Harehills, Kirkstall, Middleton, Morley, Potternewton and Wortley will include quieter and more relaxed sessions for those with additional needs. Extra staff will be on hand to offer assistance at these sessions, with queuing kept to a minimum and designated parking provided where possible.

    A summertime staple in local parks since 2004, Breeze-themed events have become renowned over the years for their focus on fun, inclusivity and value for money.

    The wider city’s commitment to those same principles means there are no shortage of other free, low-cost or pay-as-you-can entertainment options for children and young people in Leeds during the school holidays.

    And to help families plan their to-do lists, the council’s Child Friendly Leeds team has now produced – with support from partners and stakeholders – a handy guide giving full details of what’s on and when.

    The guide covers everything from magic shows at Leeds City Museum and workshops at Leeds Discovery Centre to film screenings at Hyde Park Picture House and children’s activities at Leeds Kirkgate Market – as well, of course, as Breeze In The Park.

    Also featured is Wonderland Awaits, an immersive city centre trail of Lewis Carroll-themed installations that runs from July 26 to August 31 and will take in landmark locations such as the Corn Exchange, the Royal Armouries and the Victoria Quarter.

    The release of the guide aligns with one of the key goals of the Child Friendly Leeds ’12 Wishes’ action plan, which was developed using views gathered from 80,000 children and young people.

    Wish number seven of the 12 wishes in the plan is focused on the need to ensure that information about events, activities, groups, cultural experiences and days out is communicated and promoted as effectively as possible.

    Councillor Salma Arif, Leeds City Council’s executive member for adult social care, active lifestyles and culture, said:

    “Breeze In The Park is a much-loved part of summer for children and young people across the city and I’m sure they, like me, will be delighted that it’s back once again.

    “By making the events low-cost, taking them out into so many different communities and running sessions for those with additional needs, we aim to ensure they are as accessible and inclusive as possible.

    “My thanks go to all the organising team for their hard work in making Breeze In The Park a success year in, year out.”

    Councillor Helen Hayden, Leeds City Council’s executive member for children and families, said:

    “Our summer events guide is an excellent illustration of how Child Friendly Leeds is endeavouring to make this the best city in the country to grow up in.

    “The range of activities detailed in the guide is truly impressive and it’s our hope that it contains something for everyone.

    “This has been a really positive and collaborative project, with the support the Child Friendly Leeds team has received from partners and stakeholders being great to see.”

    All of the Breeze In The Park events will have one main session, running from midday to 4pm.

    Additional needs sessions will run from 11am to midday, with those attending them being welcome to stay on for the afternoon activities at no extra charge.

    Tickets for all sessions cost £1 each and must be bought in advance. Purchases can be made here or, for additional needs sessions, here. A full list of event dates and locations can be found on the same web pages.

    Breeze In The Park is funded with the generous support of the council’s network of local community committees.

    Breeze Pass holders get fast-track access to some of the most popular inflatable attractions. Please note, pass holders must still purchase tickets in advance.

    ENDS

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: ASIA/SOUTH KOREA – Like a hidden treasure. Korean Catholics treasure the memory of their martyrs

    Source: Agenzia Fides – MIL OSI

    [embedded content]
    by Pascale RizkSeoul (Fides Agency) – “If we follow the example of the martyrs and believe in the word of the Lord, then we will understand the sublime freedom and joy with which they went to their death.” These were the words of Pope Francis to the Korean people during the Mass for the beatification of Paul Yun Ji-Chung and his 123 fellow martyrs, celebrated on Saturday, August 16, 2014, at Gwanghwamun Gate in Seoul, during his apostolic journey to South Korea.In a Korea that hardly resembles that of three centuries ago, the joy and freedom of the martyrs of the past continue to attract many Koreans and lead them to encounter Christ.It is the places, the descendants, and even the soil that today hold “like a treasure” the memory of those who, with simple courage and the gift of self, left everything behind so as not to be “separated from the love of Christ” (Rom 8:35).This July, the Catholic Church in Korea pauses to commemorate the centenary of the beatification of its first 79 martyrs, canonized in 1984.Pilgrimages in the footsteps of martyrsIn recent years, the emotion felt by many Koreans who visit the sites of their martyrdom seems to be growing and becoming increasingly intense.In 2011, bishops and priests responsible for places of martyrdom in various dioceses created an ideal itinerary entitled “Shrines of Catholicism in Korea,” an initiative that has become a valuable guide for pilgrims. It collects and lists 167 references to shrines dear to the memories of the Church, 69 of which are places of martyrdom. The guidebook includes a prayer to begin the pilgrimage and another to conclude it. In its revised edition published in 2019, the guide distinguishes between shrines, places of martyrdom, and places of pilgrimage.The most well-known and popular places are the itineraries proposed by the Archdiocese of Seoul as pilgrimage routes, which were also approved by the Holy See on September 14, 2018. Three itineraries, presented as the ‘ Good News Road’, ‘the Eternal Life Road’ and ‘the Unity Road’, offer visitors the chance to walk through the streets of the capital, visiting the most important monuments in the history of the Catholic Church on the peninsula, such as Gwanghuimun Gate, where the bodies of martyred Catholics were carried, hence its nickname ‘Gate of the Dead’. Other significant sites include the Jeoldusan Shrine, a rocky promontory where thousands of baptized Christians were martyred, and the Gahoe-dong Church, where the first Mass was celebrated in 1795. At other points identified along the route, such as the site of the house of John the Baptist Yi Byeok, who welcomed the first Korean Christians, only commemorative plaques remain, after centuries of destruction and reconstruction have radically altered the urban landscape.The descendants honor their ancestorsIn September, the Catholic Church in Korea commemorates its 103 saints and 124 blessed. The former were canonized by Pope John Paul II in 1984, while the latter were proclaimed blessed by Pope Francis in 2014. The relics presented to public worship a few days ago, on July 2, in Seoul, belong to four Korean saints. The relics belong to three French missionaries of the Societé des Missions Etrangères de Paris (Bishop Laurent Imbert, Priests Pierre Maubant and Jacques Chastan), together with the first Korean priest, Andrea Kim Tae-gon. The Korean Bishops’ Conference received these relics on February 19, previously kept by the Sisters of St. Benedict of Olivetano in Korea. In particular, they are a fragment of Andrew Kim’s foot bone and hair from the others. Kim was martyred at the age of 25 on September 16, 1846, while the French missionaries were beheaded on September 21, 1839, in Saenamteo, on the north bank of the Han River, in the Yongsan-gu district of Seoul. The ceremony was part of a series of commemorative events for the centenary of the holy month of the beatification of the 79 martyrs.New faces of martyrdomCurrently, the Catholic Church in Korea is pursuing the beatification process for two other groups of baptized Christians who were killed during the persecutions. The first is that of the Servant of God John Baptist Yi Byeok and his 132 lay companions killed during the Joseon dynasty between 1785 and 1879. Yi Byeok played a key role in the first Korean Christian community and his companions included Francis Xavier Kwon Il-shin and Ambrose Kwon Cheol-shin.The second group is that of Bishop Francis Borgia Hong Yeong-ho and his 80 companions who lived in modern times, some of whom died in the 1901 massacre in Jeju and others killed after the division of Korea, including 20 priests and 3 foreign missionary nuns. Among them are Sister Marie Mechtilde of the Blessed Sacrament and Sister Teresa of the Child Jesus of the Carmelite monastery in Seoul who, together with three other foreign sisters, founded the small convent in Hyehwa-dong, desired by Bishop Won Larriveau in 1940. All of them had the opportunity to flee abroad, but decided to remain with the Korean nuns: two of them were kidnapped and tortured. Eventually, during the infamous “death march” from Pyongyang to Chunggangjin on the Amnok River, they were martyred and buried in North Korea. The other three were repatriated to their country of origin, France, thanks to a prisoner exchange.The Maryknoll missionary Patrick Byrne, the first bishop of Pyongyang, who was originally from the United States, also chose to remain in Korea during the war. Refusing to denounce the United States, the United Nations, and the Vatican, he was sentenced to death by the North Koreans but managed to survive, albeit after suffering brutal treatment. He later joined other prisoners on a forced march led by a ruthless commander known as “the Tiger.” Despite his suffering and exhaustion, Byrne assisted dying soldiers, praying and giving blessings along the way. On the third day of the march, while giving general absolution to the soldiers kneeling with him in the snow-covered mountains, he fell seriously ill and died in a freezing North Korean hospital with no medicine, known to the prisoners as “the morgue.”The investigation for the beatification process was completed in June 2022 in Korea, and the relevant material was sent to the Congregation for the Causes of Saints.The hidden shrine of HantiDuring the Joseon dynasty, Catholics fled to the south of the country and sought refuge in the mountains. They tried to stay close to or at least in secret contact with their families who had been imprisoned and arrested in various places. Thus, the first Christian families arrived at the mountain called Hanti, located 600 meters above sea level, northwest of Palgongsan and north of the city of Daegu, in the province of Gyeongsang. After the persecutions of Eulhae (1815), Jeonghae (1827), and Gihae (1839), and during a period of easing tensions in the middle of the century, the presence of Catholics in the country had become significant. This is also attested to by the letter sent in 1862 to François-Antoine Albrand, Superior General of the Paris Foreign Missions Society, by Siméon-François Berneux, Vicar Apostolic of Korea (1854-1866), which reads: “I went to a very isolated village on the side of a large mountain, and about 40 Christians received Holy Communion.”With the Byeongin persecution (1866), which followed the Gyeongsin persecution (1860), the tribulations of Korean Catholics reached their peak of violence, becoming extermination: nearly 8,000 out of 10,000 were killed. Then came the Mujin persecution (1868), which struck the inhabitants of Hanti, martyred on the spot for apostasy.The first pilgrimages to the site began a hundred years later, and in 1988 six martyrs’ graves were exhumed and transferred. Present at the site, Joo-gang Thomas Aquinas, professor of anatomy at the National University of Kyeongpook’s medical school, recounts in an article in a Catholic newspaper: “The body in front of me was decapitated. The neck was bent at the waist and the lower part of the body was lying on the ground. I carefully examined the cervical vertebrae. There were no fractures and the number matched; it seemed that only the flesh had been cut with a sharp knife. Tears streamed from my eyes.“ Today, 37 tombs of the “countless unknown martyrs” rest on Hanti Hill in the metropolitan archdiocese of Daegu.The soil soaked with the blood of martyrsThere were just as many nameless martyrs in the diocese of Daejeon, 157 kilometers from Daegu. “In 2014, Father Peter Kim Dongyum oversaw the transfer of the graves of the nameless Korean martyrs, who belonged to the lowest social class and were killed in the 19th century in Deoksan, Haemi, and Hongju, cities located in the diocese. This intervention was necessary because rising water levels threatened the integrity of the graves,“ says Father Agostino Han, head of the office at the Dicastery for Evangelization. ”The graves were transferred to a plot of land adjacent to the Silli Shrine. In Silli, Saint Marie-Nicolas-Antoine Daveluy, M.E.P., fifth bishop of the Korean peninsula, secretly carried out his pastoral ministry for 21 years. During the transfer, Peter Kim felt compelled to preserve some of the soil around the graves, believing that it might contain relics of the Martyrs, who had been buried without proper funeral rites due to the harsh persecutions of the time. For this reason, he reserved a portion of that soil for the creation of ceramic crucifixes and rosary beads, incorporating the soil taken from the tombs of the Martyrs. It can therefore be assumed that these rosary beads contain soil imbued with the blood and bone fragments of those Martyrs who offered their lives in witness to their faith. It is a way of honoring them, their faith, and their memory.”(Fides Agency 22/7/25)Share:

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Gaza: UN staff now fainting from hunger, exhaustion; WHO worker detained

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI

    “Doctors, nurses, journalists, humanitarians, among them UNRWA staff, are hungry…fainting due to hunger and exhaustion while performing their duties,” said Juliette Touma, Director of Communications with the UN agency for Palestine refugees, UNRWA. 

    Speaking from Amman, she stressed that seeking food “has become as deadly as the bombardments.”

    The development comes as the UN human rights office, OHCHR, announced on Tuesday that more than 1,000 Palestinians have now been killed by the Israeli military while trying to get food in Gaza since the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) started operating on 27 May. 

    “As of 21 July, we have recorded 1,054 people killed in Gaza while trying to get food,” said OHCHR spokesperson Thameen Al-Kheetan; “766 of them were killed in the vicinity of GHF sites and 288 near UN and other humanitarian organizations’ aid convoys.” 

    Mr. Al-Kheetan noted that the finding came from “multiple reliable sources on the ground, including medical teams, humanitarian and human rights organizations. It is still being verified in line with our strict methodology.”

    The Foundation’s hubs are supported by the US and Israeli authorities and started operating in southern Gaza on 27 May, bypassing the UN and other established NGOs. 

    Aid relief is not a job for mercenaries

    “The so-called GHF distribution scheme is a sadistic death-trap,” UNRWA’s Ms. Touma said. “Snipers open fire randomly on crowds, as if they’re given a licence to kill.” 

    Quoting a statement by UNRWA head Philippe Lazzarini, Ms. Touma called the scheme a “massive hunt of people in total impunity.”

    “This cannot be our new norm. Humanitarian assistance is not the job of mercenaries,” she added.

    The UNRWA spokesperson insisted that the UN and its humanitarian partners have the expertise, experience and available resources to provide safe, dignified and at-scale assistance. 

    “We have proven it time and again during the last ceasefire,” she said.

    Living conditions in the Strip have reached a new low as prices for basic commodities have increased by around 4,000 per cent. For Gaza’s inhabitants who have lost their homes and been displaced multiple times, they have no income and find themselves completely deprived of essentials.

    A child waits for food in Gaza.

    $200 for a bag of flour

    Ms. Touma highlighted the testimony of a colleague on the ground who had to walk for hours to buy a bag of lentils and some flour, paying almost $200 for it. 

    On Monday, the UN World Food Programme (WFP) said that a quarter of Gaza’s population faces famine-like conditions. Almost 100,000 women and children are suffering from severe acute malnutrition and need treatment as soon as possible.

    Vital everyday items such as diapers are scarce and costly, at about $3 each. Mothers have resorted to using plastic bags instead, while one father “said that he had to cut one of his last shirts to give his daughter sanitary pads,” Ms. Touma said.

    “We at UNRWA have stocks of hygiene supplies, including diapers for babies and for adults waiting outside the gates of Gaza,” Ms. Touma stressed, insisting that the agency has 6,000 trucks loaded with food, medicines and hygiene supplies waiting in Egypt and in Jordan to be allowed into the enclave.

    Urgent ceasefire call

    She reiterated the UN’s calls for “a deal that would bring a ceasefire, that would release the hostages, that would bring in a standard flow of humanitarian supplies into Gaza under the management of the United Nations, including UNRWA.”

    Humanitarian operations in the enclave are being pushed into an “ever-shrinking space”, said World Health Organization (WHO) spokesperson Tarik Jašarević.

    Briefing journalists in Geneva, he condemned three attacks on Monday on a building housing WHO staff in Deir Al-Balah in central Gaza, as well as the “mistreatment of those sheltering there and the destruction of its main warehouse.”

    “Staff and their families, including children, were exposed to grave danger and traumatized after airstrikes caused a fire and significant damage,” Mr. Jašarević said, adding that Israeli military entered the premises, “forcing women and children to evacuate on foot” towards the coastal shelter of Al Mawasi amid active conflict. 

    Screened at gunpoint

    The WHO spokesperson said that staff and family members were “handcuffed, stripped, interrogated on the spot and screened at gunpoint.” Two staff and two family members were detained and while three were later released, one WHO staff member remains in detention for reasons unknown to the organization.

    Mr. Jašarević called for the release of the detained staff member and insisted that “no one should be held without charges and without due process.”

    The latest evacuation order for the area has impacted several WHO premises and compromised its presence on the ground, “crippling efforts to sustain a collapsing health system,” Mr. Jašarević added, and “pushing survival further out of reach for more than two million people.” 

    The Israeli military operation in Deir Al-Balah on Monday also caused an explosion and fire inside WHO’s main warehouse, which is located within the evacuation zone in the central Gazan city – “part of a pattern of systematic destruction of health facilities,” the agency’s spokesperson said.

    According to Gaza’s health authorities, since the start of the war in October 2023 some 1,500 health workers have been killed in the Strip. Some 94 per cent of all health facilities have been damaged and half of Gaza’s hospitals are “not functional at all,” Mr. Jašarević said. 

    “The chance to prevent loss of lives and reverse immense damage to the health system slips further out of reach every day,” he stressed.

    Visa denials 

    Spotlighting further challenges to the humanitarian operation in Gaza, the WHO spokesperson pointed to an increase in the denial of visas by the Israeli authorities for emergency medical teams seeking to enter the Strip since the breakdown of the latest ceasefire between Israel and Hamas on 18 March. 

    He said that 58 international staff for the emergency medical teams, including surgeons and critical medical specialists, have been denied access.

    UNRWA’s Ms. Touma highlighted the fact that ever since the agency’s Commissioner-General was denied entry to Gaza in March 2024, he has not been allowed back into the Strip. He has also not received a visa from Israel to enter the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, for more than a year. 

    The UNRWA spokesperson also deplored the lack of access for international media to the enclave. 

    “It certainly is time, if not long overdue, for international media to go into Gaza precisely to look into the facts and to help with reporting first-hand information on the horrors that people in Gaza are living through,” she said. 

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Hermandad de Pistoleros Latinos gang member sentenced to 100 months for heroin trafficking

    Source: United States Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF)

    LAREDO, Texas – A 33-year-old Laredo man has been sentenced for possession with the intent to distribute 100 grams or more of heroin, announced U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei.

    Raul Garcia Jr. aka Rule pleaded guilty Aug. 6. 2024.

    U.S. District Judge Keith P. Ellison has now ordered Garcia to serve 100 months in federal prison to be immediately followed by four years of supervised release. At the hearing, the court heard about Garcia’s numerous prior convictions and contacts with law enforcement. In handing down the sentence, the court noted this was a serious crime.

    The investigation began in January 2024 when law enforcement learned Garcia may have been selling fentanyl in the Laredo area. Over the next three months, authorities discovered Garcia was selling narcotics out of his home.

    A search warrant in March of that year resulted in the discovery of heroin packaged for street sale. A month later, law enforcement obtained a second search warrant and again found heroin. Similar to previously found drugs, the heroin was also packaged for street sale.

    The searches also revealed methamphetamine, crack cocaine, fentanyl, marijuana, money and stolen firearm.

    At the time of his plea, Garcia admitted to possessing the drugs located and seized throughout the investigation.

    He will remain in custody pending transfer to a Federal Bureau of Prisons facility to be determined in the near future.

    The Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and the Laredo Police Department’s Narcotics Division conducted the investigation with assistance from Immigration and Customs Enforcement – Homeland Security Investigations and Border Patrol. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Steven Chamberlin and Leslie Cortez prosecuted the case.

    This case is being prosecuted as part of an Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF) investigation. OCDETF is the largest anti-crime task force in the country. OCDETF identifies, disrupts and dismantles the highest-level criminal organizations that threaten the United States using a prosecutor-led, intelligence-driven, multi-agency approach. Additional information about the OCDETF Program can be found on the Department of Justice’s OCDETF webpage.

    MIL Security OSI –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Mobile vs. Machine: BAY Miner Redefines BTC and XRP Mining in the Post-Halving Era

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    London, UK, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — With the post-halving reality of Bitcoin now set in, and XRP continuing to gain momentum in institutional finance, BAY Miner has emerged as a revolutionary platform that brings together two realms: new cloud mining and mobile access. The platform is changing the way both novices and experienced investors mine crypto by providing an easy, rapid, and flexible method to earn digital assets.

    The Post-Halving Shift: A New Mining Landscape

    Bitcoin halving will occur in April 2024 in which block rewards will be reduced from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC which will create a more historically difficult environment for mining. Conventional miners will be facing reduced margins and higher fixed costs and will face more competition from other miners competing for the same pool of BTC rewards. Advantageous conditions of mining have gone away and in today’s environment, efficiency, flexibility and accessibility are must-haves not nice-to-haves if you want to be competitive as a miner. 

    BAY Miner’s cloud-based ecosystem provides an opportunity to participate in BTC and XRP mining at little to no hardware, technical know-how or large up-front payments.  The concept is to create a more efficient, intelligent (decentralized) mining solution and ecosystem supporting a BTC and XRP mining landscape for a miner after the halving.

    Democratizing Mining: Power in Your Pocket

    BAY Miner’s mission is clear—make crypto mining accessible to everyone, not just those with warehouses of hardware. Through its mobile-first platform, users can mine Bitcoin and XRP from anywhere in the world with nothing more than a smartphone and an internet connection.

    Mining should be open to all, regardless of tech background or budget. We’ve built a platform that turns crypto mining into a tap-and-earn experience—secure, scalable, and user-friendly.

    Unlike traditional mining setups that demand expensive rigs and constant maintenance, BAY Miner delivers passive income through intelligent cloud contracts. Everything happens in the background—users just watch their balance grow daily.

    How It Works: Cloud Mining, Simplified

    Cloud mining through BAY Miner eliminates the need for physical infrastructure. Users lease computing power from professional data centers operated by BAY Miner, which are equipped with high-performance GPUs and ASIC hardware in countries like the UAE, Canada, and the U.S.

    These centers handle all technical operations. Meanwhile, users control everything from the app—select contracts, monitor returns, and withdraw profits at their convenience.

    BAY Miner Platform Highlights:

    • Mobile-First Interface: Available on Android and iOS for 24/7 access
    • AI-Powered Allocation: Smart algorithms optimize mining performance across multiple pools
    • Support for XRP & BTC: You mine 2 assets and gain 2 streams of earnings
    • Instant Withdrawals: Your profits are paid electronically directly to your wallet (there are no lock-in periods)
    • Safety facility: Enterprise-level safety – complete with global regulatory compliance
    • Support: Access support 24/7 with multilingual agents supportive era very easy to work with customers.

    Post-Halving Mining Strategies: BAY Miner’s Smart Contracts

    Post-halving mining demands smarter strategies and more efficient use of computing resources. BAY Miner achieves this with a variety of customizable contracts suited for different budgets and timelines.

    Popular Mining Plans:

    • BTC Starter Contract
      Investment: $100
      Duration: 2 Days
      Daily Return: $4.00
      Total Return: $108
    • XRP Growth Contract
      Investment: $600
      Duration: 6 Days
      Daily Return: $7.26
      Total Return: $643.56
    • BTC Premium Contract
      Investment: $3,000
      Duration: 10 Days
      Daily Return: $42.50
      Total Return: $3,425

    These packages are designed to offer quick ROI while allowing users to reinvest or diversify based on current market trends. Every contract is backed by BAY Miner’s AI engine, which ensures optimal performance—even when the market fluctuates.

    Why BAY Miner Leads in 2025

    In a saturated market of mining platforms, BAY Miner stands out by combining trust, transparency, and technology. It’s more than just a mining app—it’s a financial tool designed for modern crypto users.

    Key Differentiators:

    • Regulatory Compliance: Licensed operations across key global jurisdictions
    • Transparent Earnings: Real-time monitoring of profits, energy allocation, and contract status
    • Referral Rewards: Incentives for sharing the platform with your network
    • Sustainable Mining: Eco-conscious energy sources power BAY Miner’s facilities

    Users can feel confident that their mining activities are both profitable and ethical.

    Getting Started: Mine Smarter, Not Harder

    The onboarding process is quick and intuitive:

    Step 1: Download the BAY Miner app from Google Play or the App Store
    Step 2: Register using your email or crypto wallet
    Step 3: Choose a contract that fits your investment goal
    Step 4: Start mining immediately—no waiting, no approvals
    Step 5: Track your returns and withdraw your earnings anytime

    Within minutes, users can begin generating passive crypto income with zero complexity.

    The Future of Crypto Mining Is Here

    As BTC and XRP keep playing essential parts in global digital finance, firms such as BAY Miner will shape the future of mining. In a world with a focus on energy efficiency, decentralization, and access, BAY Miner will show the world how mining can be powerful and personal.

    No bulky machines. No technical barriers. Just intelligent mining—made for mobile.

    Official Website: https://www.bayminer.com/
    Contact Email: support@bayminer.com
    App Download: Android & iOS

    Start your cloud mining journey today with BAY Miner. The digital gold rush is back—this time, it fits in your pocket.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: PSB Holdings, Inc. Reports Record Quarterly Earnings of $0.89 Per Diluted Share; Net Interest Margin Improves For Fifth Consecutive Quarter

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WAUSAU, Wis., July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — PSB Holdings, Inc. (“PSB”) (OTCQX: PSBQ), the holding company for Peoples State Bank (“Peoples”) serving Northcentral and Southeastern Wisconsin reported second quarter earnings ending June 30, 2025 up 48% relative to the prior quarter to $0.89 per diluted common share on net income of $3.8 million, compared to $0.60 per diluted common share on net income of $2.6 million during the first quarter ending March 31, 2025, and $0.56 per diluted common share on net income of $2.4 million during the second quarter ending June 30, 2024.

    PSB’s second quarter 2025 operating results reflected the following changes from the first quarter of 2025: (1) a stronger net interest margin as asset yields rose; (2) higher non-interest income from higher mortgage banking income; and (3) lower non-interest expenses due to lower salaries and employee benefit expenses.

    “We are proud to report record earnings for the second quarter, highlighted by an improving net interest margin and cost controls that have lowered our non-interest expenses and improved our efficiency ratio to 63%. Over the past year, we increased tangible book value per share by 13.1% while paying $0.64 per share in dividends to our shareholders. As loans continue to reprice at higher rates and new loans are originated at higher levels than current yields, we expect our net interest margin to continue to expand from current levels. While non-performing assets have grown, they represent a small number with special circumstances, and we expect favorable resolutions for certain significant non-performing assets by the end of the calendar year,” stated Scott Cattanach, President and CEO.

    June 30, 2025, Highlights:

    • Net interest income increased $470,000 to $10.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, from $10.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, due in part to higher yields on loans and one additional day during the quarter.
    • Noninterest income increased $230,000 to $2.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to $1.9 million the prior quarter due primarily to higher mortgage banking revenues.
    • Noninterest expenses decreased $776,000 to $8.2 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2025 from $9.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, reflecting lower salary and benefit expenses.
    • Net loans increased $12.9 million, or 1% in the second quarter ended June 30, 2025, to $1.11 billion compared to March 31, 2025, largely due to increased commercial line usage. Allowance for credit losses remained at 1.12% of gross loans.
    • Non-performing assets increased $2.6 million to $15.6 million, or 1.04% of total assets at June 30, 2025 compared to the previous quarter. One existing non-performing loan relationship increased during the quarter as an additional loan in this relationship was moved to non-performing status. The underlying security of these loans is undergoing a sales process by the owner. Additionally, an unrelated new loan relationship was added to non-performing status.
    • Total deposits increased $47.5 million to $1.18 billion at June 30, 2025 from $1.13 billion at March 31, 2025, with the increase largely consisting of non-interest bearing demand deposits and time deposits with balances greater than $250,000. Core deposits increased $32.3 million while brokered deposits decreased $13.7 million. A portion of the overall deposit increase relates to an established customer making a large time deposit near the end of the quarter.
    • Return on average tangible common equity was 13.11% for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to 9.21% the prior quarter and 9.34% in the year ago quarter.
    • Tangible book value per common share was up 13.1% over the past year to $27.77 at June 30, 2025, compared to $24.55 at June 30, 2024. Additionally, PSB paid dividends totaling $0.64 per share during the past year.

    Balance Sheet and Asset Quality Review

    Total assets increased $46.8 million during the second quarter to $1.51 billion at June 30, 2025, compared to $1.46 billion at March 31, 2025. Cash and cash equivalents increased $34.9 million to $57.5 million at June 30, 2025 from $22.7 million at March 31, 2025 as new deposits replenished reserves used to fund new loans. Investment securities available for sale increased $1.7 million to $184.3 million at June 30, 2025, from $182.6 million one quarter earlier.

    Gross loans receivable increased $10.7 million to $1.15 billion at June 30, 2025, compared to one quarter earlier, due primarily to increased commercial & industrial lending. Commercial & industrial loans increased $11.2 million to $135.3 million at June 30, 2025, and commercial real estate loans increased $3.6 million to $566.5 million at June 30, 2025, compared to three months earlier. Commercial real estate construction and development loans decreased $9.2 million to $77.9 million at June 30, 2025, while residential real estate loans increased $3.3 million from the prior quarter to $337.1 million. Agricultural loans increased $1.6 million to $13.2 million at June 30, 2025 compared to three months earlier. The loan portfolio remains well diversified with commercial real estate and construction loans totaling 56.1% of gross loans, followed by residential real estate loans at 29.4% of gross loans, commercial non-real estate loans at 14.1% and consumer loans at 0.4%.

    The allowance for credit losses remained at 1.12% of gross loans at June 30, 2025 while annualized net charge-offs to average loans were zero for the quarter ended June 30, 2025. Non-performing assets increased $2.6 million to $15.6 million, or 1.04% of total assets at June 30, 2025 up from 0.89% at March 31, 2025. The increase reflects a loan relationship that was non-performing in the prior quarter having an additional loan move to non-performing status in the second quarter and a separate loan relationship within the timber industry where the customer has experienced irregular cashflows. Approximately 80% of the non-performing assets consisted of five loan relationships.

    Total deposits increased 4% quarter over quarter, with 23% of the deposit portfolio being uninsured at June 30th. Overall, core deposits increased $32.3 million during the quarter while brokered deposits decreased $13.7 million.

    At June 30, 2025, non-interest bearing demand deposits increased to 23.6% of total deposits from 21.7% the prior quarter, while interest-bearing demand and savings deposits decreased to 27.4% at June 30, 2025 from 29.4% one quarter earlier. The additional deposit inflow helped to decrease FHLB advances during the quarter by $4.3 million and brokered deposits by $13.7 million.

    Tangible stockholder equity as a percentage of total tangible assets decreased to 7.95% at June 30, 2025, compared to 8.05% at March 31, 2025, and 7.32% at June 30, 2024.

    Tangible net book value per common share increased $3.22 during the quarter to $27.77, at June 30, 2025 compared to $24.55 one year earlier, an increase of 13.1% after dividends of $0.64 were paid to shareholders. Relative to the prior quarter’s tangible book value per common share of $26.94, tangible net book value per common share increased primarily due to earnings and an increase in the fair market value of the investment portfolios. The accumulated other comprehensive loss on the investment portfolio was $15.8 million at June 30, 2025, compared to $16.7 million one quarter earlier.

    Operations Review

    Net interest income increased to $10.7 million (on a net margin of 3.09%) for the second quarter of 2025, from $10.3 million (on a net margin of 3.03%) for the first quarter of 2025, and increased from $9.4 million (on a net margin of 2.84%) for the second quarter of 2024. The higher net interest income in the current period primarily relates to higher loan yields during the quarter. Earning asset yields increased to 5.40% during the second quarter of 2025 from 5.35% the prior period and cost of funds increased four basis points to 3.06% compared to 3.02% during the first quarter of 2025. Relative to one year earlier, earning asset yields were up 19 basis points while the overall cost of funds was flat.

    The increase in earning asset yields was due to higher yields on loan originations, loan renewals and security repricing. Loan yields increased during the second quarter of 2025 to 5.91% from 5.82% for the first quarter of 2025. Taxable security yields on a smaller average balance relative to the prior quarter were 3.24% for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, compared to 3.35% for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, while tax-exempt security yields remained at 3.35% for the quarter ended June 30, 2025.

    Total noninterest income increased $230,000 during the second quarter of 2025 to $2.1 million. An increase of $161,000 in mortgage banking income during the quarter accounted for the majority of the change.

    Noninterest expenses decreased $776,000 to $8.2 million for the second quarter of 2025, compared to $9.0 million for the first quarter of 2025, and decreased $202,000 from $8.4 million for the second quarter of 2024. On a linked quarter basis, salary and benefits expense decreased $474,000 as the first quarter results reflected an increase in variable commercial sales incentive expense. Occupancy and facilities costs decreased $67,000, data processing and other office operation expenses decreased $12,000, a gain on the sale of foreclosed real estate was $58,000 and various other noninterest expenses decreased $225,000 during the second quarter ended June 30, 2025. Partially offsetting the expense reductions was an increase in advertising and promotion expenses of $60,000.

    Income taxes increased $279,000 during the second quarter to $752,000, from $473,000 one quarter earlier on higher income levels. The effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2025, was 16.6% compared to 15.6% for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    About PSB Holdings, Inc.

    PSB Holdings, Inc. is the parent company of Peoples State Bank. Peoples is a community bank headquartered in Wausau, Wisconsin, serving northcentral and southeastern Wisconsin from twelve full-service banking locations in Marathon, Oneida, Vilas, Portage, Milwaukee and Waukesha counties. Peoples also provides investment and insurance products, along with retirement planning services, through Peoples Wealth Management, a division of Peoples. PSB Holdings, Inc. is traded under the stock symbol PSBQ on the OTCQX Market. More information about PSB, its management, and its financial performance may be found at www.psbholdingsinc.com.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about PSB’s business based, in part, on assumptions made by management and include, without limitation, statements with respect to the potential growth of PSB, its future profits, expected stock repurchase levels, future dividend rates, future interest rates, and the adequacy of its capital position. Forward-looking statements can be affected by known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including, but not limited to, strength of the economy, the effects of government policies, including interest rate policies, risks associated with the execution of PSB’s vision and growth strategy, including with respect to current and future M&A activity, and risks associated with global economic instability. The forward-looking statements in this press release speak only as of the date on which they are made and PSB does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this release.

     
    PSB Holdings, Inc.
    Consolidated Balance Sheets
    June 30, and March 31, 2025, September 30, and June 30, 2024, unaudited, December 31, 2024 derived from audited financial statements
                 
        Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30, Jun. 30,
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)     2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
                 
    Assets            
                 
    Cash and due from banks   $ 23,022   $ 19,628   $ 21,414   $ 23,554   $ 16,475  
    Interest-bearing deposits     2,890     702     3,724     5,126     251  
    Federal funds sold     31,624     2,351     15,360     58,434     69,249  
                 
    Cash and cash equivalents     57,536     22,681     40,498     87,114     85,975  
    Securities available for sale (at fair value)     184,320     182,594     189,086     174,911     165,177  
    Securities held to maturity (fair values of $75,016, $77,375, $79,654, $82,389 and $79,993 respectively)     83,123     85,373     86,748     86,847     86,825  
    Equity securities     2,885     2,847     2,782     1,752     1,661  
    Loans held for sale     349     734     217     –     2,268  
    Loans receivable, net (allowance for credit losses of $12,553, $12,392, $12,342, $12,598 and $12,597 respectively)     1,109,296     1,096,422     1,078,204     1,057,974     1,074,844  
    Accrued interest receivable     5,006     5,184     5,042     4,837     5,046  
    Foreclosed assets     –     300     –     –     –  
    Premises and equipment, net     13,397     13,522     13,805     14,065     14,048  
    Mortgage servicing rights, net     1,684     1,717     1,742     1,727     1,688  
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock (at cost)     9,297     8,825     8,825     8,825     8,825  
    Cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance     25,067     24,897     24,732     24,565     24,401  
    Core deposit intangible     330     353     195     212     229  
    Goodwill     3,495     3,495     2,541     2,541     2,541  
    Other assets     10,832     10,828     11,539     10,598     12,111  
                 
    TOTAL ASSETS   $ 1,506,617   $ 1,459,772   $ 1,465,956   $ 1,475,968   $ 1,485,639  
                 
    Liabilities            
                 
    Non-interest-bearing deposits   $ 277,239   $ 245,672   $ 259,515   $ 265,078   $ 250,435  
    Interest-bearing deposits     900,303     884,364     887,834     874,035     901,886  
                 
    Total deposits     1,177,542     1,130,036     1,147,349     1,139,113     1,152,321  
                 
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     165,950     170,250     162,250     181,250     184,900  
    Other borrowings     6,250     6,343     6,872     6,128     5,775  
    Senior subordinated notes     4,784     4,783     4,781     4,779     4,778  
    Junior subordinated debentures     13,075     13,049     13,023     12,998     12,972  
    Allowance for credit losses on unfunded commitments     622     672     672     477     477  
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities     15,118     13,554     14,723     12,850     13,069  
                 
    Total liabilities     1,383,341     1,338,687     1,349,670     1,357,595     1,374,292  
                 
    Stockholders’ equity            
                 
    Preferred stock – no par value:            
    Authorized – 30,000 shares; Issued – 7,200 shares            
    Outstanding – 7,200 shares, respectively     7,200     7,200     7,200     7,200     7,200  
    Common stock – no par value with a stated value of $1.00 per share:            
    Authorized – 18,000,000 shares; Issued – 5,490,798 shares            
    Outstanding – 4,041,573, 4,084,708, 4,092,977, 4,105,594 and 4,128,382 shares, respectively     1,830     1,830     1,830     1,830     1,830  
    Additional paid-in capital     8,659     8,608     8,610     8,567     8,527  
    Retained earnings     144,548     142,277     139,838     138,142     135,276  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax     (15,764 )   (16,692 )   (19,314 )   (15,814 )   (20,503 )
    Treasury stock, at cost – 1,449,225, 1,406,090, 1,397,821, 1,385,204 and 1,362,416 shares, respectively     (23,197 )   (22,138 )   (21,878 )   (21,552 )   (20,983 )
                 
    Total stockholders’ equity     123,276     121,085     116,286     118,373     111,347  
                 
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 1,506,617   $ 1,459,772   $ 1,465,956   $ 1,475,968   $ 1,485,639  
    PSB Holdings, Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Income
                     
        Quarter Ended Six Months Ended
    (dollars in thousands,   Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30, Jun. 30, June
    except per share data – unaudited)     2025     2025     2024     2024     2024     2025     2024  
                     
    Interest and dividend income:                
    Loans, including fees   $ 16,510   $ 15,782   $ 15,646   $ 15,634   $ 15,433   $ 32,292   $ 30,542  
    Securities:                
    Taxable     1,566     1,641     1,545     1,345     1,295     3,207     2,492  
    Tax-exempt     506     517     522     522     521     1,023     1,047  
    Other interest and dividends     332     345     948     699     265     677     608  
                     
    Total interest and dividend income     18,914     18,285     18,661     18,200     17,514     37,199     34,689  
                     
    Interest expense:                
    Deposits     5,934     5,884     6,027     5,905     5,838     11,818     11,920  
    FHLB advances     1,899     1,792     1,890     2,038     1,860     3,691     3,310  
    Other borrowings     48     47     57     57     58     95     118  
    Senior subordinated notes     58     59     59     59     58     117     117  
    Junior subordinated debentures     250     248     252     252     255     498     506  
                     
    Total interest expense     8,189     8,030     8,285     8,311     8,069     16,219     15,971  
                     
    Net interest income     10,725     10,255     10,376     9,889     9,445     20,980     18,718  
    Provision for credit losses     110     117     –     –     100     227     195  
                     
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses     10,615     10,138     10,376     9,889     9,345     20,753     18,523  
                     
    Noninterest income:                
    Service fees     366     358     362     367     350     724     686  
    Mortgage banking income     411     250     414     433     433     661     741  
    Investment and insurance sales commissions     335     326     226     230     222     799     343  
    Net loss on sale of securities     –     (1 )   (511 )   –     –     661     (495 )
    Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance     170     163     166     165     159     (1 )   316  
    Other noninterest income     814     770     620     648     742     1,584     1,359  
                     
    Total noninterest income     2,096     1,866     1,277     1,843     1,906     3,962     2,950  
                     
    Noninterest expense:                
    Salaries and employee benefits     4,828     5,302     4,691     4,771     5,167     10,130     10,290  
    Occupancy and facilities     719     786     691     757     733     1,505     1,454  
    Loss (gain) on foreclosed assets     (58 )   –     –     1     –     (58 )   –  
    Data processing and other office operations     1,189     1,201     1,111     1,104     1,047     2,390     2,069  
    Advertising and promotion     189     129     141     164     171     318     300  
    Core deposit intangible amortization     23     23     17     17     20     46     44  
    Other noninterest expenses     1,303     1,528     1,351     1,337     1,257     2,831     2,563  
                     
    Total noninterest expense     8,193     8,969     8,002     8,151     8,395     17,162     16,720  
                     
    Income before provision for income taxes     4,518     3,035     3,651     3,581     2,856     7,553     4,753  
    Provision for income taxes     752     473     524     593     410     1,225     579  
                     
    Net income   $ 3,766   $ 2,562   $ 3,127   $ 2,988   $ 2,446   $ 6,328   $ 4,174  
    Preferred stock dividends declared   $ 122   $ 122   $ 122   $ 122   $ 122   $ 244   $ 244  
                     
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 3,644   $ 2,440   $ 3,005   $ 2,866   $ 2,324   $ 6,084   $ 3,930  
    Basic earnings per common share   $ 0.90   $ 0.60   $ 0.73   $ 0.69   $ 0.56   $ 1.49   $ 0.95  
    Diluted earnings per common share   $ 0.89   $ 0.60   $ 0.73   $ 0.69   $ 0.56   $ 1.49   $ 0.95  
    PSB Holdings, Inc.
    Quarterly Financial Summary
     
    (dollars in thousands, except per share data)   Quarter ended
        Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30, Jun. 30,
    Earnings and dividends:     2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
                 
    Interest income   $ 18,914   $ 18,285   $ 18,661   $ 18,200   $ 17,514  
    Interest expense   $ 8,189   $ 8,030   $ 8,285   $ 8,311   $ 8,069  
    Net interest income   $ 10,725   $ 10,255   $ 10,376   $ 9,889   $ 9,445  
    Provision for credit losses   $ 110   $ 117   $ –   $ –   $ 100  
    Other noninterest income   $ 2,096   $ 1,866   $ 1,277   $ 1,843   $ 1,906  
    Other noninterest expense   $ 8,193   $ 8,969   $ 8,002   $ 8,151   $ 8,395  
    Net income available to common shareholders   $ 3,644   $ 2,440   $ 3,005   $ 2,866   $ 2,324  
                 
    Basic earnings per common share (3)   $ 0.90   $ 0.60   $ 0.73   $ 0.69   $ 0.56  
    Diluted earnings per common share (3)   $ 0.89   $ 0.60   $ 0.73   $ 0.69   $ 0.56  
    Dividends declared per common share (3)   $ 0.34   $ –   $ 0.32   $ –   $ 0.32  
    Tangible net book value per common share (4)   $ 27.77   $ 26.94   $ 25.98   $ 26.41   $ 24.55  
                 
    Semi-annual dividend payout ratio     22.58 % n/a   23.27 % n/a   33.61 %
    Average common shares outstanding     4,070,721     4,088,824     4,094,360     4,132,218     4,139,456  
                 
                 
    Balance sheet – average balances:            
    Loans receivable, net of allowances for credit loss   $ 1,111,004   $ 1,091,533   $ 1,064,619   $ 1,066,795   $ 1,088,013  
    Assets   $ 1,480,851   $ 1,462,862   $ 1,479,812   $ 1,445,613   $ 1,433,749  
    Deposits   $ 1,142,279   $ 1,140,397   $ 1,151,450   $ 1,110,854   $ 1,111,240  
    Stockholders’ equity   $ 123,077   $ 118,576   $ 118,396   $ 114,458   $ 110,726  
                 
                 
    Performance ratios:            
    Return on average assets (1)     1.02 %   0.71 %   0.84 %   0.82 %   0.69 %
    Return on average common stockholders’ equity (1)     12.61 %   8.88 %   10.75 %   10.63 %   9.03 %
    Return on average tangible common stockholders’ equity (1)(4)     13.11 %   9.21 %   11.07 %   10.96 %   9.34 %
    Net loan charge-offs to average loans (1)     0.00 %   0.02 %   0.02 %   0.00 %   0.00 %
    Nonperforming loans to gross loans     1.39 %   1.15 %   0.95 %   0.97 %   1.15 %
    Nonperforming assets to total assets     1.04 %   0.89 %   0.71 %   0.71 %   0.84 %
    Allowance for credit losses to gross loans     1.12 %   1.12 %   1.13 %   1.18 %   1.16 %
    Nonperforming assets to tangible equity plus the allowance for credit losses (4)     12.64 %   10.71 %   8.85 %   8.71 %   11.09 %
    Net interest rate margin (1)(2)     3.09 %   3.03 %   2.96 %   2.90 %   2.84 %
    Net interest rate spread (1)(2)     2.34 %   2.33 %   2.23 %   2.16 %   2.15 %
    Service fee revenue as a percent of average demand deposits (1)     0.54 %   0.58 %   0.53 %   0.56 %   0.56 %
    Noninterest income as a percent of gross revenue     9.98 %   9.26 %   6.40 %   9.20 %   9.81 %
    Efficiency ratio (2)     63.00 %   72.88 %   67.59 %   68.43 %   72.52 %
    Noninterest expenses to average assets (1)     2.22 %   2.49 %   2.15 %   2.24 %   2.35 %
    Average stockholders’ equity less accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to average assets     9.31 %   9.22 %   9.08 %   9.06 %   9.03 %
    Tangible equity to tangible assets (4)     7.95 %   8.05 %   7.76 %   7.85 %   7.32 %
                 
    Stock price information:            
                 
    High   $ 25.70   $ 26.50   $ 27.90   $ 25.00   $ 21.40  
    Low   $ 23.65   $ 25.60   $ 25.00   $ 20.30   $ 19.75  
    Last trade value at quarter-end   $ 23.89   $ 25.70   $ 26.50   $ 25.00   $ 20.40  
                 
    (1) Annualized
    (2) The yield on federally tax-exempt loans and securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 21%.
    (3) Due to rounding, cumulative quarterly per share performance may not equal annual per share totals.
    (4) Tangible stockholders’ equity excludes goodwill and core deposit intangibles.
    PSB Holdings, Inc.
    Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
                 
        Quarter Ended
        Jun. 30, Mar. 31, Dec. 31, Sep. 30, Jun. 30,
    (dollars in thousands – unaudited)     2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
                 
    Net income   $ 3,766   $ 2,562   $ 3,127   $ 2,988   $ 2,446  
                 
    Other comprehensive income, net of tax:            
                 
    Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale     972     2,551     (3,955 )   4,738     184  
                 
    Reclassification adjustment for security loss included in net income     –     1     404     –     –  
                 
    Accretion of unrealized loss included in net income on securities available for sale deferred tax adjustment for Wisconsin Act 19     (35 )   –     (76 )   –     –  
                 
    Amortization of unrealized loss included in net income on securities available for sale transferred to securities held to maturity     91     89     90     90     89  
                 
    Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swap     (87 )   (6 )   65     (101 )   39  
                 
    Reclassification adjustment of interest rate swap settlements included in earnings     (13 )   (13 )   (27 )   (38 )   (40 )
                 
                 
    Other comprehensive income (loss)     928     2,622     (3,499 )   4,689     272  
                 
    Comprehensive income (loss)   $ 4,694   $ 5,184   $ (372 ) $ 7,677   $ 2,718  
    PSB Holdings, Inc.            
    Nonperforming Assets as of:            
                 
        Jun 30, Mar 31, Dec 31, Sep 30, Jun 30,
    (dollars in thousands)     2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
                 
    Nonaccrual loans (excluding restructured loans)   $ 15,333   $ 12,404   $ 10,109   $ 10,116   $ 12,184  
    Nonaccrual restructured loans     13     17     18     25     28  
    Restructured loans not on nonaccrual     295     280     286     292     299  
    Accruing loans past due 90 days or more     –     –     –     –     –  
                 
    Total nonperforming loans     15,641     12,701     10,413     10,433     12,511  
    Other real estate owned     –     300     –     –     –  
                 
    Total nonperforming assets   $ 15,641   $ 13,001   $ 10,413   $ 10,433   $ 12,511  
                 
    Nonperforming loans as a % of gross loans receivable     1.39 %   1.15 %   0.95 %   0.97 %   1.15 %
    Total nonperforming assets as a % of total assets     1.04 %   0.89 %   0.71 %   0.71 %   0.84 %
    Allowance for credit losses as a % of nonperforming loans     80.26 %   97.57 %   118.52 %   120.75 %   100.69 %
    PSB Holdings, Inc.
    Nonperforming Assets >= $500,000 net book value before specific reserves
    At June 30, 2025
             
    (dollars in thousands)        
          Gross Specific
    Collateral Description   Asset Type Principal Reserves
             
    Real estate – Recreational facility   Nonaccrual   3,940     145  
    Real estate – Equipment dealership   Nonaccrual   2,708     560  
    Real estate – Non owner occupied rental properties   Nonaccrual   4,227     0  
    Real estate – Wood products   Nonaccrual   1,707     271  
             
             
    Total listed nonperforming assets     $ 12,582   $ 976  
    Total bank wide nonperforming assets     $ 15,641   $ 1,180  
    Listed assets as a % of total nonperforming assets       80 %   83 %
    PSB Holdings, Inc.            
    Loan Composition by Collateral Type            
                 
    Quarter-ended (dollars in thousands)   Jun 30, 2025 Mar 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Sep 30, 2024 Jun 30, 2024
                 
    Commercial:            
    Commercial and industrial   $ 135,313   $ 124,074   $ 116,864   $ 115,234   $ 125,508  
    Agriculture     13,219     11,632     11,568     11,203     11,480  
    Municipal     12,805     12,878     15,733     12,596     11,190  
                 
    Total Commercial     161,337     148,584     144,165     139,033     148,178  
                 
    Commercial Real Estate:            
    Commercial real estate     566,526     562,901     551,641     541,577     544,171  
    Construction and development     77,905     87,080     79,377     60,952     70,540  
                 
    Total Commercial Real Estate     644,431     649,981     631,018     602,529     614,711  
                 
    Residential real estate:            
    Residential     266,203     268,490     271,643     269,954     270,944  
    Construction and development     31,439     26,884     28,959     34,655     36,129  
    HELOC     39,425     38,364     36,887     36,734     33,838  
                 
    Total Residential Real Estate     337,067     333,738     337,489     341,343     340,911  
                 
    Consumer installment     4,886     4,683     5,060     4,770     4,423  
                 
    Subtotals – Gross loans     1,147,721     1,136,986     1,117,732     1,087,675     1,108,223  
    Loans in process of disbursement     (26,496 )   (28,752 )   (27,791 )   (17,836 )   (21,484 )
                 
    Subtotals – Disbursed loans     1,121,225     1,108,234     1,089,941     1,069,839     1,086,739  
    Net deferred loan costs     624     580     605     733     702  
    Allowance for credit losses     (12,553 )   (12,392 )   (12,342 )   (12,598 )   (12,597 )
                 
    Total loans receivable   $ 1,109,296   $ 1,096,422   $ 1,078,204   $ 1,057,974   $ 1,074,844  
    PSB Holdings, Inc.
    Selected Commercial Real Estate Loans by Purpose
     
        Jun 30, Mar 31, Dec 31, Sept 30, June 30,
    (dollars in thousands)     2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
                           
        Total Exposure % of Portfolio (1) Total Exposure % of Portfolio (1) Total Exposure % of Portfolio (1) Total Exposure % of Portfolio (1) Total Exposure % of Portfolio (1)
    Multi Family   $ 145,523   14.0 % $ 143,674   13.9 % $ 140,087   14.0 % $ 140,307   14.7 % $ 146,873   15.2 %
    Industrial and Warehousing     105,256   10.2     109,366   10.6     103,794   10.4     96,995   10.2     96,286   9.6  
    Retail     29,407   2.8     29,285   2.8     23,438   2.3     25,263   2.7     26,154   2.7  
    Hotels     25,299   2.4     25,719   2.5     25,892   2.6     26,057   2.7     29,035   3.0  
    Office     7,131   0.7     7,254   0.7     6,234   0.6     6,378   0.7     6,518   0.7  
                           
    (1) Percentage of commercial and commercial real estate portfolio and commitments.
    PSB Holdings, Inc.
    Deposit Composition
                           
    Insured and Collateralized Deposits   June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,
    (dollars in thousands)     2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
        $ % $ % $ % $ % $ %
                           
    Non-interest bearing demand   $ 225,916   19.2 % $ 206,562   18.3 % $ 204,167   17.8 % $ 210,534   18.5 % $ 202,343   17.5 %
    Interest-bearing demand and savings     304,779   25.9 %   314,957   27.9 %   315,900   27.6 %   305,631   26.8 %   304,392   26.5 %
    Money market deposits     113,161   9.6 %   118,047   10.4 %   141,024   12.3 %   138,376   12.2 %   137,637   12.0 %
    Retail and local time deposits <= $250     165,368   14.0 %   158,066   14.0 %   155,099   13.5 %   155,988   13.7 %   149,298   13.0 %
                           
    Total core deposits     809,224   68.7 %   797,632   70.6 %   816,190   71.2 %   810,529   71.2 %   793,670   69.0 %
    Retail and local time deposits > $250     28,000   2.4 %   26,750   2.3 %   25,500   2.2 %   23,500   2.1 %   22,500   2.0 %
    Broker & national time deposits <= $250     748   0.1 %   1,241   0.1 %   1,241   0.1 %   1,241   0.1 %   1,490   0.1 %
    Broker & national time deposits > $250     65,917   5.6 %   79,090   7.0 %   56,164   4.9 %   56,164   4.9 %   56,328   4.9 %
                           
    Totals   $ 903,889   76.8 % $ 904,713   80.0 % $ 899,095   78.4 % $ 891,434   78.3 % $ 873,988   76.0 %
                           
                           
    PSB Holdings, Inc.                      
    Deposit Composition                      
                           
    Uninsured Deposits   June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,
    (dollars in thousands)     2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
        $ % $ % $ % $ % $ %
                           
    Non-interest bearing demand   $ 51,323   4.4 % $ 39,110   3.5 % $ 55,348   4.8 % $ 54,544   4.8 % $ 48,092   4.1 %
    Interest-bearing demand and savings     17,983   1.5 %   17,262   1.5 %   20,934   1.8 %   18,317   1.6 %   32,674   2.8 %
    Money market deposits     157,998   13.4 %   150,222   13.3 %   153,334   13.4 %   157,489   13.8 %   177,954   15.4 %
    Retail and local time deposits <= $250     –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %
                           
    Total core deposits     227,304   19.3 %   206,594   18.3 %   229,616   20.0 %   230,350   20.2 %   258,720   22.3 %
    Retail and local time deposits > $250     46,349   3.9 %   18,729   1.7 %   18,638   1.6 %   17,329   1.5 %   19,613   1.7 %
    Broker & national time deposits <= $250     –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %
    Broker & national time deposits > $250     –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %   –   0.0 %
                           
    Totals   $ 273,653   23.2 % $ 225,323   20.0 % $ 248,254   21.6 % $ 247,679   21.7 % $ 278,333   24.0 %
                           
                           
    PSB Holdings, Inc.                      
    Deposit Composition                      
                           
    Total Deposits   June 30, March 31, December 31, September 30, June 30,
    (dollars in thousands)     2025     2025     2024     2024     2024  
        $ % $ % $ % $ % $ %
                           
    Non-interest bearing demand   $ 277,239   23.6 % $ 245,672   21.7 % $ 259,515   22.6 % $ 265,078   23.3 % $ 250,435   21.6 %
    Interest-bearing demand and savings     322,762   27.4 %   332,219   29.4 %   336,834   29.4 %   323,948   28.4 %   337,066   29.3 %
    Money market deposits     271,159   23.0 %   268,269   23.7 %   294,358   25.7 %   295,865   26.0 %   315,591   27.4 %
    Retail and local time deposits <= $250     165,368   14.0 %   158,066   14.1 %   155,099   13.5 %   155,988   13.7 %   149,298   13.0 %
                           
    Total core deposits     1,036,528   88.0 %   1,004,226   88.9 %   1,045,806   91.2 %   1,040,879   91.4 %   1,052,390   91.3 %
    Retail and local time deposits > $250     74,349   6.3 %   45,479   4.0 %   44,138   3.8 %   40,829   3.6 %   42,113   3.7 %
    Broker & national time deposits <= $250     748   0.1 %   1,241   0.1 %   1,241   0.1 %   1,241   0.1 %   1,490   0.1 %
    Broker & national time deposits > $250     65,917   5.6 %   79,090   7.0 %   56,164   4.9 %   56,164   4.9 %   56,328   4.9 %
                           
    Totals   $ 1,177,542   100.0 % $ 1,130,036   100.0 % $ 1,147,349   100.0 % $ 1,139,113   100.0 % $ 1,152,321   100.0 %
    PSB Holdings, Inc.
    Average Balances ($000) and Interest Rates
    (dollars in thousands)
                             
        Quarter ended June 30, 2025   Quarter ended March 31, 2025   Quarter ended June 30, 2024
        Average   Yield /   Average   Yield /   Average   Yield /
        Balance Interest Rate   Balance Interest Rate   Balance Interest Rate
    Assets                        
    Interest-earning assets:                        
    Loans (1)(2)   $ 1,123,460   $ 16,558   5.91 %   $ 1,103,895   $ 15,830   5.82 %   $ 1,100,518   $ 15,520   5.67 %
    Taxable securities     193,926     1,566   3.24 %     198,426     1,641   3.35 %     172,563     1,295   3.02 %
    Tax-exempt securities (2)     76,774     641   3.35 %     79,282     654   3.35 %     79,564     659   3.33 %
    FHLB stock     9,189     166   7.25 %     8,825     241   11.08 %     7,931     182   9.23 %
    Other     14,571     166   4.57 %     8,960     104   4.71 %     8,241     83   4.05 %
                             
    Total (2)     1,417,920     19,097   5.40 %     1,399,388     18,470   5.35 %     1,368,817     17,739   5.21 %
                             
    Non-interest-earning assets:                            
    Cash and due from banks     15,498           16,292           17,345      
    Premises and equipment, net     13,527           13,728           13,930      
    Cash surrender value ins     24,960           24,795           24,297      
    Other assets     21,402           21,021           21,865      
    Allowance for credit losses     (12,456 )         (12,362 )         (12,505 )    
                             
    Total   $ 1,480,851     $ 1,462,862     $ 1,433,749  
                             
    Liabilities & stockholders’ equity                            
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                            
    Savings and demand deposits   $ 315,978   $ 1,450   1.84 %   $ 339,909   $ 1,567   1.87 %   $ 331,740   $ 1,467   1.78 %
    Money market deposits     262,015     1,572   2.41 %     280,396     1,685   2.44 %     271,336     1,835   2.72 %
    Time deposits     294,750     2,912   3.96 %     268,821     2,632   3.97 %     257,006     2,536   3.97 %
    FHLB borrowings     173,080     1,899   4.40 %     164,968     1,792   4.41 %     174,596     1,860   4.28 %
    Other borrowings     8,843     48   2.18 %     6,321     47   3.02 %     6,870     58   3.40 %
    Senior sub notes     4,784     58   4.86 %     4,782     59   5.00 %     4,777     58   4.88 %
    Junior sub. debentures     13,062     250   7.68 %     13,036     248   7.72 %     12,960     255   7.91 %
                             
    Total     1,072,512     8,189   3.06 %     1,078,233     8,030   3.02 %     1,059,285     8,069   3.06 %
                             
    Non-interest-bearing liabilities:                            
    Demand deposits     269,536           251,271           251,158      
    Other liabilities     15,726           14,782           12,580      
    Stockholders’ equity     123,077           118,576           110,726      
                             
    Total   $ 1,480,851     $ 1,462,862     $ 1,433,749  
                             
    Net interest income     $ 10,908         $ 10,440         $ 9,670    
    Rate spread       2.34 %       2.33 %       2.15 %
    Net yield on interest-earning assets           3.09 %       3.03 %       2.84 %
                             
    (1) Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.
    (2) The yield on federally tax-exempt loans and securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 21%.
    PSB Holdings, Inc.
    Average Balances ($000) and Interest Rates
    (dollars in thousands)
     
        Six months ended June 30, 2025   Six months ended June 30, 2024
        Average   Yield/   Average   Yield/
        Balance Interest Rate   Balance Interest Rate
    Assets                
    Interest-earning assets:                
    Loans (1)(2)   $ 1,113,731   $ 32,388   5.86 %   $ 1,097,419   $ 30,719   5.63 %
    Taxable securities     196,162     3,207   3.30 %     172,176     2,492   2.91 %
    Tax-exempt securities (2)     78,021     1,295   3.35 %     79,999     1,325   3.33 %
    FHLB stock     9,008     407   9.11 %     7,215     347   9.67 %
    Other     11,790     270   4.62 %     10,562     261   4.97 %
                     
    Total (2)     1,408,712     37,567   5.38 %     1,367,371     35,144   5.17 %
                     
    Non-interest-earning assets:                
    Cash and due from banks     15,893           17,356      
    Premises and equipment, net     13,627           13,557      
    Cash surrender value ins     24,878           24,221      
    Other assets     21,215           21,534      
    Allowance for credit losses     (12,409 )         (12,445 )    
                     
    Total   $ 1,471,916     $ 1,431,594  
                     
    Liabilities & stockholders’ equity Interest-bearing liabilities:                
    Savings and demand deposits   $ 327,878   $ 3,017   1.86 %   $ 341,119   $ 3,139   1.85 %
    Money market deposits     270,785     3,257   2.43 %     272,591     3,732   2.75 %
    Time deposits     281,857     5,544   3.97 %     260,832     5,049   3.89 %
    FHLB borrowings     169,046     3,691   4.40 %     158,761     3,310   4.19 %
    Other borrowings     7,589     95   2.52 %     7,712     118   3.08 %
    Senior sub. notes     4,783     117   4.93 %     4,776     117   4.93 %
    Junior sub. debentures     13,049     498   7.70 %     12,947     506   7.86 %
                     
    Total     1,074,987     16,219   3.04 %     1,058,738     15,971   3.03 %
                     
    Non-interest-bearing liabilities:                    
    Demand deposits     260,522           249,909      
    Other liabilities     15,492           12,881      
    Stockholders’ equity     120,915           110,066      
                     
    Total   $ 1,471,916     $ 1,431,594  
                     
    Net interest income     $ 21,348         $ 19,173    
    Rate spread       2.34 %       2.14 %
    Net yield on interest-earning assets   3.06 %       2.82 %
                     
    (1) Nonaccrual loans are included in the daily average loan balances outstanding.
    (2) The yield on federally tax-exempt loans and securities is computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 21%.

    Investor Relations Contact
    PSB Holdings, Inc.
    1905 Stewart Avenue
    Wausau, WI 54401
    888.929.9902
    InvestorRelations@bankpeoples.com

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. Announces Financial Results for the Second Quarter of the Year Ending December 31, 2025 and Declaration of a Quarterly Dividend

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ASHEVILLE, N.C., July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (NYSE: HTB) (“Company”), the holding company of HomeTrust Bank (“Bank”), today announced preliminary net income for the second quarter of the year ending December 31, 2025 and approval of its quarterly cash dividend.

    For the quarter ended June 30, 2025 compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2025:

    • net income was $17.2 million compared to $14.5 million;
    • diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) were $1.00 compared to $0.84;
    • annualized return on assets (“ROA”) was 1.58% compared to 1.33%;
    • annualized return on equity (“ROE”) was 11.97% compared to 10.52%;
    • net interest margin was 4.32% compared to 4.18%;
    • provision for credit losses was $1.3 million compared to $1.5 million;
    • gain on the sale of our two Knoxville, Tennessee branches was $1.4 million compared to $0;
    • quarterly cash dividends continued at $0.12 per share totaling $2.1 million for both periods; and
    • 78,412 shares of Company common stock were repurchased during the current quarter at an average price of $35.74 compared to 14,800 shares repurchased at an average price of $33.64 in the prior quarter.

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2024:

    • net income was $31.7 million compared to $27.5 million;
    • diluted EPS were $1.84 compared to $1.61;
    • annualized ROA was 1.46% compared to 1.25%;
    • annualized ROE was 11.26% compared to 10.73%;
    • net interest margin was 4.25% compared to 4.08%;
    • provision for credit losses was $2.8 million compared to $5.4 million;
    • tax-free death benefit proceeds from life insurance were $0 compared to $1.1 million;
    • cash dividends of $0.24 per share totaling $4.1 million compared to $0.22 per share totaling $3.7 million; and
    • 93,212 shares of Company common stock were repurchased during the six months at an average price of $35.41 compared to 23,483 shares repurchased at an average price of $27.48 in the same period last year.

    The Company also announced today that its Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per common share payable on August 28, 2025 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on August 14, 2025.

    “Given the current economic uncertainty, we are pleased to report another quarter of strong financial results,” said C. Hunter Westbrook, President and Chief Executive Officer. “These results reflect HTB’s commitment to remain nimble and be prudent balance sheet managers. Our earnings story over recent quarters has primarily been driven by our top quartile net interest margin, which expanded to 4.32% this quarter, and our ability to limit growth in our expense base.

    “HTB previously set a goal to be a consistently high-performing regional community bank that is a regionally and nationally recognized ‘Best Place to Work.’ As a result of this strong financial performance, for the second year in a row, the Company was named one of Forbes’ America’s Best Banks for 2025 and recognized as a Top 50 Community Bank in the 2024 S&P Global Market Intelligence annual rankings, awards based on the overall financial performance and strength of financial institutions. The Company was also recently included in the coveted 2025 KBW Bank Honor Roll, a distinction granted to only 5% of eligible banks based on their best-in-class earnings growth over the past ten years. Over the last year, HTB has been recognized as a best place to work in all five states we serve as well as nationally by Newsweek and American Banker.

    “Lastly, during the quarter we completed the previously announced sale of our two Knoxville, Tennessee branches. This transaction reflects our efforts to tighten our geographic footprint, improve our branch efficiencies, and allow us to better allocate capital to support long-term growth in other core markets.”

    WEBSITE: WWW.HTB.COM

    Comparison of Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025
    Net Income.  Net income totaled $17.2 million, or $1.00 per diluted share, for the three months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $14.5 million, or $0.84 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2025, an increase of $2.7 million, or 18.4%. Results for the three months ended June 30, 2025 benefited from a $1.3 million increase in net interest income and a $2.1 million increase in noninterest income due to a $1.4 million gain on the sale of two branch locations. Details of the changes in the various components of net income are further discussed below.

    Net Interest Income.  The following table presents the distribution of average assets, liabilities and equity, as well as interest income earned on average interest-earning assets and interest expense paid on average interest-bearing liabilities. All average balances are daily average balances. Nonaccruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.

      Three Months Ended
      June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025
    (Dollars in thousands) Average
    Balance
    Outstanding
      Interest
    Earned /
    Paid
      Yield /
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Outstanding
      Interest
    Earned /
    Paid
      Yield /
    Rate
    Assets                      
    Interest-earning assets                      
    Loans receivable(1) $ 3,804,502     $ 60,440   6.37 %   $ 3,802,003     $ 58,613   6.25 %
    Debt securities available for sale   149,611       1,658   4.45       152,659       1,787   4.75  
    Other interest-earning assets(2)   149,175       1,543   4.15       206,242       3,235   6.36  
    Total interest-earning assets   4,103,288       63,641   6.22       4,160,904       63,635   6.20  
    Other assets   263,603               266,141          
    Total assets $ 4,366,891             $ 4,427,045          
    Liabilities and equity                      
    Interest-bearing liabilities                      
    Interest-bearing checking accounts $ 563,817     $ 1,251   0.89 %   $ 573,316     $ 1,324   0.94 %
    Money market accounts   1,329,973       9,004   2.72       1,345,575       9,177   2.77  
    Savings accounts   182,340       37   0.08       183,354       38   0.08  
    Certificate accounts   868,321       8,564   3.96       951,715       9,824   4.19  
    Total interest-bearing deposits   2,944,451       18,856   2.57       3,053,960       20,363   2.70  
    Junior subordinated debt   10,154       206   8.14       10,129       205   8.21  
    Borrowings   31,154       350   4.51       12,301       160   5.28  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   2,985,759       19,412   2.61       3,076,390       20,728   2.73  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits   744,585               719,522          
    Other liabilities   59,973               70,821          
    Total liabilities   3,790,317               3,866,733          
    Stockholders’ equity   576,574               560,312          
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,366,891             $ 4,427,045          
    Net earning assets $ 1,117,529             $ 1,084,514          
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities   137.43 %             135.25 %        
    Non-tax-equivalent                      
    Net interest income     $ 44,229           $ 42,907    
    Interest rate spread         3.61 %           3.47 %
    Net interest margin(3)         4.32 %           4.18 %
    Tax-equivalent(4)                      
    Net interest income     $ 44,660           $ 43,325    
    Interest rate spread         3.65 %           3.51 %
    Net interest margin(3)         4.37 %           4.22 %

    (1)  Average loans receivable balances include loans held for sale and nonaccruing loans.
    (2)  Average other interest-earning assets consist of FRB stock, FHLB stock, SBIC investments and deposits in other banks.
    (3)  Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
    (4)  Tax-equivalent results include adjustments to interest income of $431 and $418 for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively, calculated based on a combined federal and state tax rate of 24%.

    Total interest and dividend income for the three months ended June 30, 2025 did not vary significantly when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Regarding the components of this income, loan interest income increased $1.8 million, or 3.1%, primarily due to an increase in yield on loans and an additional day in the current quarter, which was offset by a $1.7 million, or 52.3%, decrease in other investments and interest-bearing deposits income, mainly due to a $1.0 million, or 78.9%, decrease in SBIC investment income where significant investment appreciation was recognized in the prior quarter. Accretion income on acquired loans of $1.0 million and $322,000 was recognized during the same periods, respectively, and was included in interest income on loans.

    Total interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2025 decreased $1.3 million, or 6.3%, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily the result of a decline in the average balance of certificate accounts, specifically brokered deposits, and a decline in the average cost of funds across funding categories.

    The following table shows the effects that changes in average balances (volume), including the difference in the number of days in the periods compared, and average interest rates (rate) had on the interest earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities:

      Increase / (Decrease)
    Due to
      Total
    Increase /
    (Decrease)
    (Dollars in thousands) Volume   Rate  
    Interest-earning assets          
    Loans receivable $ 703     $ 1,124     $ 1,827  
    Debt securities available for sale   (17 )     (112 )     (129 )
    Other interest-earning assets   (878 )     (814 )     (1,692 )
    Total interest-earning assets   (192 )     198       6  
    Interest-bearing liabilities          
    Interest-bearing checking accounts   (8 )     (65 )     (73 )
    Money market accounts   (7 )     (166 )     (173 )
    Savings accounts   —       (1 )     (1 )
    Certificate accounts   (767 )     (493 )     (1,260 )
    Junior subordinated debt   3       (2 )     1  
    Borrowings   249       (59 )     190  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   (530 )     (786 )     (1,316 )
    Increase in net interest income         $ 1,322  


    Provision for Credit Losses.
      The provision for credit losses is the amount of expense that, based on our judgment, is required to maintain the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) at an appropriate level under the current expected credit losses model.

    The following table presents a breakdown of the components of the provision for credit losses:

      Three Months Ended    
    (Dollars in thousands) June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   $ Change   % Change
    Provision for credit losses              
    Loans $ 1,385     $ 800     $ 585     73 %
    Off-balance-sheet credit exposure   (82 )     740       (822 )   (111 )
    Total provision for credit losses $ 1,303     $ 1,540     $ (237 )   (15 )%

    For the quarter ended June 30, 2025, the “loans” portion of the provision for credit losses was the result of the following, offset by net charge-offs of $2.0 million during the quarter:

    • $0.3 million benefit driven by changes in the loan mix.
    • $1.6 million benefit due to changes in qualitative adjustments, partially offset by a slight worsening of the projected economic forecast, specifically the national unemployment rate. Of note, we released the $2.2 million qualitative allocation previously established for the potential impact of Hurricane Helene upon our loan portfolio which had been established in the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Any residual impact of the Hurricane is believed to have now been reflected elsewhere within the ACL calculation.
    • $1.3 million increase in specific reserves on individually evaluated loans.

    For the quarter ended March 31, 2025, the “loans” portion of the provision for credit losses was the result of the following, offset by net charge-offs of $1.3 million during the quarter:

    • $0.6 million benefit driven by changes in the loan mix.
    • A slight improvement in the projected economic forecast, specifically the national unemployment rate, was offset by changes in qualitative adjustments.
    • $0.1 million increase in specific reserves on individually evaluated loans.

    For the quarter ended June 30, 2025, the amount recorded for off-balance-sheet credit exposure was the result of an increase in the balance of loan commitments offset by changes in the projected economic forecast and qualitative allocation as outlined above. For the quarter ended March 31, 2025, the amount recorded for off-balance-sheet credit exposure was the result of an increase in the balance of loan commitments and changes in the loan mix and projected economic forecast as outlined above.

    Noninterest Income.  Noninterest income for the three months ended June 30, 2025 increased $2.1 million, or 26.5%, when compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2025. Changes in the components of noninterest income are discussed below:

      Three Months Ended    
    (Dollars in thousands) June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   $ Change   % Change
    Noninterest income              
    Service charges and fees on deposit accounts $ 2,502     $ 2,244     $ 258     11 %
    Loan income and fees   548       721       (173 )   (24 )
    Gain on sale of loans held for sale   2,109       1,908       201     11  
    Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) income   852       842       10     1  
    Operating lease income   1,876       1,379       497     36  
    Gain on sale of branches   1,448       —       1,448     100  
    Gain on sale of premises and equipment   28       —       28     100  
    Other   794       933       (139 )   (15 )
    Total noninterest income $ 10,157     $ 8,027     $ 2,130     27 %
    • Gain on sale of loans held for sale: The increase was primarily driven by sales of the guaranteed portion of SBA commercial loans during the period. There were $7.3 million in sales of the guaranteed portion of SBA commercial loans with gains of $570,000 for the current quarter compared to $4.6 million sold and gains of $366,000 for the prior quarter. There were $108.8 million of HELOCs originated for sale which were sold during the current quarter with gains of $954,000 compared to $89.4 million sold with gains of $1.1 million in the prior quarter. There were $30.3 million of residential mortgage loans sold for gains of $558,000 during the current quarter compared to $18.8 million sold with gains of $473,000 in the prior quarter. Our hedging of mandatory commitments on the residential mortgage loan pipeline resulted in a net gain of $27,000 for the current quarter compared to a net gain of $13,000 for the prior quarter.
    • Operating lease income: The increase was primarily the result of a reduction in losses recognized on the sale of previously leased equipment. We recognized net losses of $358,000 and $745,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025, respectively.
    • Gain on sale of branches: On May 23, 2025, we completed the previously announced sale of our two Knoxville, Tennessee branches, recognizing a gain of $1.4 million. The gain was primarily the result of a premium received on the deposits assumed by the purchasing institution, partially offset by expenses associated with the transaction.

    Noninterest Expense.  Noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2025 increased $294,000, or 0.9%, when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. Changes in the components of noninterest expense are discussed below:

      Three Months Ended    
    (Dollars in thousands) June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   $ Change   % Change
    Noninterest expense              
    Salaries and employee benefits $ 18,208     $ 17,699     $ 509     3 %
    Occupancy expense, net   2,375       2,511       (136 )   (5 )
    Computer services   2,488       2,805       (317 )   (11 )
    Operating lease depreciation expense   1,789       1,868       (79 )   (4 )
    Telephone, postage and supplies   561       546       15     3  
    Marketing and advertising   442       452       (10 )   (2 )
    Deposit insurance premiums   473       511       (38 )   (7 )
    Core deposit intangible amortization   411       515       (104 )   (20 )
    Other   4,508       4,054       454     11  
    Total noninterest expense $ 31,255     $ 30,961     $ 294     1 %
    • Computer services: At the end of the prior calendar year, we finalized the multiyear renewal of our largest core processing contract. The decrease in expense quarter-over-quarter is a reflection of the improved vendor pricing negotiated through this effort.
    • Other: The change was driven by an increase in loan workout expenses in addition to smaller increases across several other expense categories.

    Income Taxes.  The amount of income tax expense is influenced by the amount of pre-tax income, tax-exempt income, changes in the statutory rate and the effect of changes in valuation allowances maintained against deferred tax benefits. The effective tax rates for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and March 31, 2025 were 21.2% and 21.1%, respectively.

    Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024
    Net Income.  Net income totaled $31.7 million, or $1.84 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $27.5 million, or $1.61 per diluted share, for the six months ended June 30, 2024, an increase of $4.3 million, or 15.5%. The results for the six months ended June 30, 2025 were positively impacted by a $3.2 million increase in net interest income, a decrease of $2.6 million in the provision for credit losses, a $1.3 million increase in noninterest income, partially offset by a $1.6 million increase in noninterest expense. Details of the changes in the various components of net income are further discussed below.

    Net Interest Income.  The following table presents the distribution of average assets, liabilities and equity, as well as interest income earned on average interest-earning assets and interest expense paid on average interest-bearing liabilities. All average balances are daily average balances. Nonaccruing loans have been included in the table as loans carrying a zero yield.

      Six Months Ended
      June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
    (Dollars in thousands) Average
    Balance
    Outstanding
      Interest
    Earned /
    Paid
      Yield /
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Outstanding
      Interest
    Earned /
    Paid
      Yield /
    Rate
    Assets                      
    Interest-earning assets                      
    Loans receivable(1) $ 3,803,259     $ 119,053   6.31 %   $ 3,874,740     $ 122,113   6.34 %
    Debt securities available for sale   151,127       3,445   4.60       130,510       2,808   4.33  
    Other interest-earning assets(2)   177,551       4,778   5.43       135,936       3,848   5.69  
    Total interest-earning assets   4,131,937       127,276   6.21       4,141,186       128,769   6.25  
    Other assets   264,865               282,550          
    Total assets $ 4,396,802             $ 4,423,736          
    Liabilities and equity                      
    Interest-bearing liabilities                      
    Interest-bearing checking accounts $ 568,540     $ 2,575   0.91 %   $ 588,567     $ 2,870   0.98 %
    Money market accounts   1,337,731       18,180   2.74       1,289,758       19,340   3.02  
    Savings accounts   182,844       75   0.08       189,887       84   0.09  
    Certificate accounts   909,787       18,389   4.08       895,242       19,162   4.30  
    Total interest-bearing deposits   2,998,902       39,219   2.64       2,963,454       41,456   2.81  
    Junior subordinated debt   10,142       411   8.17       10,042       470   9.41  
    Borrowings   21,780       510   4.72       95,235       2,902   6.13  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   3,030,824       40,140   2.67       3,068,731       44,828   2.94  
    Noninterest-bearing deposits   732,123               789,565          
    Other liabilities   65,367               50,224          
    Total liabilities   3,828,314               3,908,520          
    Stockholders’ equity   568,488               515,216          
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,396,802             $ 4,423,736          
    Net earning assets $ 1,101,113             $ 1,072,455          
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities   136.33 %             134.95 %        
    Non-tax-equivalent                      
    Net interest income     $ 87,136           $ 83,941    
    Interest rate spread         3.54 %           3.31 %
    Net interest margin(3)         4.25 %           4.08 %
    Tax-equivalent(4)                      
    Net interest income     $ 87,985           $ 84,645    
    Interest rate spread         3.58 %           3.35 %
    Net interest margin(3)         4.29 %           4.11 %

    (1)  Average loans receivable balances include loans held for sale and nonaccruing loans.
    (2)  Average other interest-earning assets consist of FRB stock, FHLB stock, SBIC investments and deposits in other banks.
    (3)  Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
    (4)  Tax-equivalent results include adjustments to interest income of $849 and $704 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively, calculated based on a combined federal and state tax rate of 24%.

    Total interest and dividend income for the six months ended June 30, 2025 decreased $1.5 million, or 1.2%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2024, which was driven by a $3.1 million, or 2.5%, decrease in interest income on loans, partially offset by a combined $1.6 million, or 23.5%, increase in interest income on debt securities available for sale and other interest-bearing assets. Accretion income on acquired loans of $1.3 million and $1.4 million was recognized during the same periods, respectively, and was included in interest income on loans. The overall decrease in average yield on interest-earning assets was mainly the result of a decline in average balances, specifically for the loan portfolio where we continue to be focused on prudent loan growth.

    Total interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2025 decreased $4.7 million, or 10.5%, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2024. The change was primarily the result of a decrease in the average balance of borrowings in addition to the cost of funds across all funding sources.

    The following table shows the effects that changes in average balances (volume), including the difference in the number of days in the periods compared, and average interest rates (rate) had on the interest earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities:

      Increase / (Decrease)
    Due to
      Total
    Increase /
    (Decrease)
    (Dollars in thousands) Volume   Rate  
    Interest-earning assets          
    Loans receivable $ (2,583 )   $ (477 )   $ (3,060 )
    Debt securities available for sale   434       203       637  
    Other interest-earning assets   1,165       (235 )     930  
    Total interest-earning assets   (984 )     (509 )     (1,493 )
    Interest-bearing liabilities          
    Interest-bearing checking accounts   (105 )     (190 )     (295 )
    Money market accounts   669       (1,829 )     (1,160 )
    Savings accounts   (3 )     (6 )     (9 )
    Certificate accounts   260       (1,033 )     (773 )
    Junior subordinated debt   4       (63 )     (59 )
    Borrowings   (2,240 )     (152 )     (2,392 )
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   (1,415 )     (3,273 )     (4,688 )
    Increase in net interest income         $ 3,195  


    Provision for Credit Losses.
      The following table presents a breakdown of the components of the provision for credit losses:

      Six Months Ended      
    (Dollars in thousands) June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024   $ Change   % Change  
    Provision for credit losses                
    Loans $ 2,185     $ 5,445     $ (3,260 )   (60 )%
    Off-balance-sheet credit exposure   658       (20 )     678     3,390  
    Total provision for credit losses $ 2,843     $ 5,425     $ (2,582 )   (48 )%

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025, the “loans” portion of the provision for credit losses was the result of the following, offset by net charge-offs of $3.3 million during the period.

    • $0.9 million benefit driven by changes in the loan mix.
    • $1.6 million benefit due to changes in qualitative adjustments, partially offset by a slight worsening of the projected economic forecast, specifically the national unemployment rate. Of note, we released the $2.2 million qualitative allocation previously established for the potential impact of Hurricane Helene upon our loan portfolio which had been established in the quarter ended September 30, 2024. Any residual impact of the Hurricane is believed to have now been reflected elsewhere within the ACL calculation.
    • $1.4 million increase in specific reserves on individually evaluated loans.

    For the six months ended June 30, 2024, the “loans” portion of the provision for credit losses was the result of the following, in addition to net charge-offs of $4.9 million during the period:

    • $1.3 million benefit due to changes in the projected economic forecast, specifically the national unemployment rate, and changes in qualitative adjustments.
    • $1.8 million increase in specific reserves on individually evaluated loans which was proportional to the increase in the associated loan balances which increased from $8.1 million to $16.3 million during the six month period, concentrated in the equipment finance and SBA portfolios.

    For the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, the amounts recorded for off-balance-sheet credit exposure were the result of changes in the balance of loan commitments, loan mix and projected economic forecast as outlined above.

    Noninterest Income.  Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2025 increased $1.3 million, or 7.4%, when compared to the same period last year. Changes in the components of noninterest income are discussed below:

      Six Months Ended    
    (Dollars in thousands) June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024   $ Change   % Change
    Noninterest income              
    Service charges and fees on deposit accounts $ 4,746     $ 4,503     $ 243     5 %
    Loan income and fees   1,269       1,325       (56 )   (4 )
    Gain on sale of loans held for sale   4,017       3,285       732     22  
    BOLI income   1,694       2,642       (948 )   (36 )
    Operating lease income   3,255       3,450       (195 )   (6 )
    Gain on sale of branches   1,448       —       1,448     100  
    Gain (loss) on sale of premises and equipment   28       (9 )     37     411  
    Other   1,727       1,728       (1 )   —  
    Total noninterest income $ 18,184     $ 16,924     $ 1,260     7 %
                                 
    • Gain on sale of loans held for sale: The increase in the gain on sale of loans held for sale was primarily driven by HELOCs and residential mortgage loans sold during the period. During the six months ended June 30, 2025, there were $198.2 million of HELOCs sold during the current period for gains of $2.0 million compared to $40.7 million sold and gains of $473,000 for the corresponding period in the prior year. There were $49.1 million of residential mortgage loans originated for sale which were sold with gains of $1.0 million compared to $36.6 million sold with gains of $667,000 for the corresponding period in the prior year. There were $11.9 million of sales of the guaranteed portion of SBA commercial loans with gains of $936,000 compared to $25.6 million sold and gains of $2.1 million for the corresponding period in the prior year. Our hedging of mandatory commitments on the residential mortgage loan pipeline resulted in a net gain of $40,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 versus a net loss of $3,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2024.
    • BOLI income: The decrease was due to $1.1 million in tax-free gains on death benefit proceeds in excess of the cash surrender value of the policies recognized in the prior period, partially offset by higher yielding policies as a result of restructuring the portfolio at the end of the prior calendar year.
    • Gain on sale of branches: As discussed earlier, during the current period we completed the previously announced sale of our two Knoxville, Tennessee branches, recognizing a gain of $1.4 million in the current period.

    Noninterest Expense.  Noninterest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2025 increased $2.1 million, or 3.6%, when compared to the same period last year. Changes in the components of noninterest expense are discussed below:

      Six Months Ended    
    (Dollars in thousands) June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024   $ Change   % Change
    Noninterest expense              
    Salaries and employee benefits $ 35,907     $ 33,584     $ 2,323     7 %
    Occupancy expense, net   4,886       4,856       30     1  
    Computer services   5,293       6,204       (911 )   (15 )
    Operating lease depreciation expense   3,657       3,565       92     3  
    Telephone, postage and supplies   1,107       1,165       (58 )   (5 )
    Marketing and advertising   894       1,251       (357 )   (29 )
    Deposit insurance premiums   984       1,085       (101 )   (9 )
    Core deposit intangible amortization   926       1,329       (403 )   (30 )
    Other   8,562       7,580       982     13  
    Total noninterest expense $ 62,216     $ 60,619     $ 1,597     3 %
                                 
    • Salaries and employee benefits: The increase was primarily the result of increases in both pay and incentive compensation.
    • Computer services: As discussed earlier, the decrease in expense year-over-year is a reflection of the improved vendor pricing associated with the multiyear renewal of our largest core processing contract.
    • Marketing and advertising: The decrease was the result of a reduction in spending in the six months ended June 30, 2025 when compared to the same period of the prior year, as we re-evaluated our marketing strategy for future periods.
    • Core deposit intangible amortization: The intangible recorded associated with the Quantum merger is being amortized on an accelerated basis, so the rate of amortization slowed year-over-year.
    • Other: The increase period-over-period was driven by increases of $274,000 in losses on the sale repossessed equipment, $234,000 in community association banking deposit line of business referral fees, and $224,000 in consulting fees.

    Income Taxes. The amount of income tax expense is influenced by the amount of pre-tax income, tax-exempt income, changes in the statutory rate and the effect of changes in valuation allowances maintained against deferred tax benefits. The effective tax rate was 21.1% for both the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024.

    Balance Sheet Review
    Total assets decreased by $17.4 million to $4.6 billion and total liabilities decreased by $44.9 million to $4.0 billion, respectively, at June 30, 2025 as compared to December 31, 2024. These changes can be traced to the use of the proceeds of both loan sales and the maturities of debt securities and certificates of deposit to fund loan growth. Total deposits declined by $113.0 million over the same period. The decrease was mainly the result of a reduction in brokered deposits of $96.5 million and $34.3 million of deposits which were assumed by the purchaser of our two Knoxville, Tennessee branches. Borrowings increased by $77.0 million to provide additional liquidity.

    Stockholders’ equity increased $27.5 million to $579.3 million at June 30, 2025 as compared to December 31, 2024. Activity within stockholders’ equity included $31.8 million in net income and $2.2 million in stock-based compensation and stock option exercises, partially offset by $4.1 million in cash dividends declared and $3.3 million in stock repurchases. In addition, accumulated other comprehensive income improved by $1.4 million due to a reduction in the unrealized loss on available for sale securities due to changes in market interest rates.

    As of June 30, 2025, the Bank was considered “well capitalized” in accordance with its regulatory capital guidelines and exceeded all regulatory capital requirements.

    Asset Quality
    The ACL on loans was $44.1 million, or 1.20% of total loans, at June 30, 2025 compared to $45.3 million, or 1.24% of total loans, at December 31, 2024. The drivers of this change are discussed in the “Comparison of Results of Operations for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024 – Provision for Credit Losses” section above.

    Net loan charge-offs totaled $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to $4.9 million for the same period last year. Annualized net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans were 0.18% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 as compared to 0.25% for the six months ended June 30, 2024.

    Nonperforming assets, made up of nonaccrual loans and repossessed assets, increased by $2.5 million, or 8.9%, to $30.5 million, or 0.67% of total assets, at June 30, 2025 compared to $28.0 million, or 0.61% of total assets, at March 31, 2025. Owner occupied commercial real estate (“CRE”) made up the largest portion of nonperforming assets at $8.9 million and $8.6 million, respectively, at these same dates. One relationship made up $5.0 million of the totals at both dates but no loss is anticipated. In addition, equipment finance loans made up $6.0 million and $5.1 million, respectively, at these same dates, concentrated in the transportation sector. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans was 0.81% at June 30, 2025 compared to 0.74% at March 31, 2025.

    Nonperforming assets increased by $1.7 million, or 6.1%, to $30.5 million, or 0.67% of total assets, at June 30, 2025 compared to $28.8 million, or 0.63% of total assets, at December 31, 2024, with the composition of nonperforming assets remaining consistent between periods. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans was 0.81% at June 30, 2025 compared to 0.76% at December 31, 2024.

    Classified assets increased by $8.2 million, or 20.0%, to $48.8 million, or 1.07% of total assets, as of June 30, 2025 when compared to the balance of $40.7 million, or 0.89% of total assets, at March 31, 2025. The drivers of the change were increases of $3.2 million in Equipment Finance loans, $2.3 million in commercial and industrial loans, and $1.6 million in owner-occupied CRE loans. Classified assets increased by $69,000, or 0.14%, to $48.8 million, or 1.07% of total assets, as of June 30, 2025 when compared to the balance of $48.8 million, or 1.06% of total assets, at December 31, 2024. The largest portfolios of classified assets at June 30, 2025 included $14.5 million of owner-occupied CRE loans, $8.6 million of equipment finance loans, $6.5 million of both 1-4 family residential real estate and commercial and industrial loans, $5.4 million of HELOCs, and $4.7 million of non-owner occupied CRE loans.

    Lastly, in an effort to assist customers in their post-Hurricane Helene recovery and clean-up efforts, at the end of the prior calendar year we granted payment deferrals of up to six months to provide short-term relief to impacted customers. The outstanding balance of these deferrals declined from $136.0 million at December 31, 2024 to $18.9 million at June 30, 2025. As stated earlier, after reassessing the remaining exposure and the sufficiency of the ACL in place, in the current quarter we released the $2.2 million qualitative allocation previously established for the storm upon our loan portfolio which had been established in the quarter ended September 30, 2024. To date, $27,000 in charge-offs have been recognized which were directly related to Hurricane Helene.

    About HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
    HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (NYSE: HTB), headquartered in Asheville, North Carolina, is the holding company for HomeTrust Bank, a state-chartered community bank operating over 30 locations across North Carolina, South Carolina, East Tennessee, Southwest Virginia, and Georgia. With total assets of $4.6 billion as of June 30, 2025, the Company’s goal is to continue to be recognized as a high-performing, regional community bank, while our strategy to reach that goal is to be a best place to work. As a reflection of these efforts, the Company has been named one of Bank Director’s “Best U.S. Banks,” one of Forbes’ “America’s Best Banks”, one of S&P Global’s “Top 50 Community Banks”, and named to the 2025 KBW Honor Roll. In addition, the Company has been recognized as one of American Banker’s “Best Banks to Work For”, received a “Most Loved Workplace” certification by Best Practices Institute, named as one of Best Companies Group’s “America’s Best Workplaces”, as well as being named a “Best Place to Work” in all five states in which the Company operates.

    Forward-Looking Statements
    This press release includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, but instead are based on certain assumptions including statements with respect to the Company’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about future economic performance and projections of financial items. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or implied by forward-looking statements. The factors that could result in material differentiation include, but are not limited to, natural disasters, including the lingering effects of Hurricane Helene; expected revenues, cost savings, synergies and other benefits from merger and acquisition activities might not be realized to the extent anticipated, within the anticipated time frames, or at all, costs or difficulties relating to integration matters, including but not limited to customer and employee retention, might be greater than expected, and goodwill impairment charges might be incurred; increased competitive pressures among financial services companies; changes in the interest rate environment; changes in general economic conditions, both nationally and in our market areas; legislative and regulatory changes; and the effects of inflation, a potential recession, and other factors described in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other documents filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission – which are available on the Company’s website at www.htb.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Any of the forward-looking statements that the Company makes in this press release or in the documents the Company files with or furnishes to the SEC are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made and may turn out to be wrong because of inaccurate assumptions, the factors described above or other factors that management cannot foresee. The Company does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

    Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

    (Dollars in thousands) June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
    (1)
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
    Assets                  
    Cash $ 16,662     $ 14,303     $ 18,778     $ 18,980     $ 18,382  
    Interest-bearing deposits   280,547       285,522       260,441       274,497       275,808  
    Cash and cash equivalents   297,209       299,825       279,219       293,477       294,190  
    Certificates of deposit in other banks   23,319       25,806       28,538       29,290       32,131  
    Debt securities available for sale, at fair value   143,942       150,577       152,011       140,552       134,135  
    FHLB and FRB stock   15,263       13,602       13,630       18,384       19,637  
    SBIC investments, at cost   17,720       17,746       15,117       15,489       15,462  
    Loans held for sale, at fair value   1,106       2,175       4,144       2,968       1,614  
    Loans held for sale, at the lower of cost or fair value   169,835       151,164       202,018       189,722       224,976  
    Total loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs   3,671,951       3,648,609       3,648,299       3,698,892       3,701,454  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans   (44,139 )     (44,742 )     (45,285 )     (48,131 )     (49,223 )
    Loans, net   3,627,812       3,603,867       3,603,014       3,650,761       3,652,231  
    Premises and equipment held for sale, at the lower of cost or fair value   616       8,240       616       616       616  
    Premises and equipment, net   62,706       62,347       69,872       69,603       69,880  
    Accrued interest receivable   16,554       18,269       18,336       17,523       18,412  
    Deferred income taxes, net   9,968       9,288       10,735       10,100       10,512  
    BOLI   92,576       91,715       90,868       90,021       89,176  
    Goodwill   34,111       34,111       34,111       34,111       34,111  
    Core deposit intangibles, net   5,670       6,080       6,595       7,162       7,730  
    Other assets   59,646       63,248       66,606       67,514       66,051  
    Total assets $ 4,578,053     $ 4,558,060     $ 4,595,430     $ 4,637,293     $ 4,670,864  
    Liabilities and stockholders’ equity                  
    Liabilities                  
    Deposits $ 3,666,178     $ 3,736,360     $ 3,779,203     $ 3,761,588     $ 3,707,779  
    Junior subordinated debt   10,170       10,145       10,120       10,096       10,070  
    Borrowings   265,000       177,000       188,000       260,013       364,513  
    Other liabilities   57,431       69,106       66,349       65,592       64,874  
    Total liabilities   3,998,779       3,992,611       4,043,672       4,097,289       4,147,236  
    Stockholders’ equity                  
    Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued or outstanding   —       —       —       —       —  
    Common stock, $0.01 par value, 60,000,000 shares authorized(2)   175       176       175       175       175  
    Additional paid in capital   174,900       176,682       176,693       175,495       172,907  
    Retained earnings   408,178       393,026       380,541       368,383       357,147  
    Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) shares   (3,703 )     (3,835 )     (3,966 )     (4,099 )     (4,232 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)   (276 )     (600 )     (1,685 )     50       (2,369 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   579,274       565,449       551,758       540,004       523,628  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,578,053     $ 4,558,060     $ 4,595,430     $ 4,637,293     $ 4,670,864  

    (1)  Derived from audited financial statements.
    (2)  Shares of common stock issued and outstanding were 17,492,143 at June 30, 2025; 17,552,626 at March 31, 2025; 17,527,709 at December 31, 2024; 17,514,922 at September 30, 2024; and 17,437,326 at June 30, 2024.


    Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (Dollars in thousands) June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
    Interest and dividend income              
    Loans $ 60,440     $ 58,613     $ 119,053     $ 122,113  
    Debt securities available for sale   1,658       1,787       3,445       2,808  
    Other investments and interest-bearing deposits   1,543       3,235       4,778       3,848  
    Total interest and dividend income   63,641       63,635       127,276       128,769  
    Interest expense              
    Deposits   18,856       20,363       39,219       41,456  
    Junior subordinated debt   206       205       411       470  
    Borrowings   350       160       510       2,902  
    Total interest expense   19,412       20,728       40,140       44,828  
    Net interest income   44,229       42,907       87,136       83,941  
    Provision for credit losses   1,303       1,540       2,843       5,425  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   42,926       41,367       84,293       78,516  
    Noninterest income              
    Service charges and fees on deposit accounts   2,502       2,244       4,746       4,503  
    Loan income and fees   548       721       1,269       1,325  
    Gain on sale of loans held for sale   2,109       1,908       4,017       3,285  
    BOLI income   852       842       1,694       2,642  
    Operating lease income   1,876       1,379       3,255       3,450  
    Gain on sale of branches   1,448       —       1,448       —  
    Gain (loss) on sale of premises and equipment   28       —       28       (9 )
    Other   794       933       1,727       1,728  
    Total noninterest income   10,157       8,027       18,184       16,924  
    Noninterest expense              
    Salaries and employee benefits   18,208       17,699       35,907       33,584  
    Occupancy expense, net   2,375       2,511       4,886       4,856  
    Computer services   2,488       2,805       5,293       6,204  
    Operating lease depreciation expense   1,789       1,868       3,657       3,565  
    Telephone, postage and supplies   561       546       1,107       1,165  
    Marketing and advertising   442       452       894       1,251  
    Deposit insurance premiums   473       511       984       1,085  
    Core deposit intangible amortization   411       515       926       1,329  
    Other   4,508       4,054       8,562       7,580  
    Total noninterest expense   31,255       30,961       62,216       60,619  
    Income before income taxes   21,828       18,433       40,261       34,821  
    Income tax expense   4,618       3,894       8,512       7,336  
    Net income $ 17,210     $ 14,539     $ 31,749     $ 27,485  

    Per Share Data

        Three Months Ended    Six Months Ended
        June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
    Net income per common share(1)                
    Basic   $ 1.01     $ 0.84     $ 1.85     $ 1.61  
    Diluted   $ 1.00     $ 0.84     $ 1.84     $ 1.61  
    Average shares outstanding                
    Basic     17,006,141       17,011,359       17,008,699       16,871,383  
    Diluted     17,106,448       17,113,424       17,109,842       16,888,550  
    Book value per share at end of period   $ 33.12     $ 32.21     $ 33.12     $ 30.03  
    Tangible book value per share at end of period(2)   $ 30.92     $ 30.00     $ 30.92     $ 27.73  
    Cash dividends declared per common share   $ 0.12     $ 0.12     $ 0.24     $ 0.22  
    Total shares outstanding at end of period     17,492,143       17,552,626       17,492,143       17,437,326  

    (1)  Basic and diluted net income per common share have been prepared in accordance with the two-class method.
    (2)  See Non-GAAP reconciliations below for adjustments.


    Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data

      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
      June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
    Performance ratios(1)          
    Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets) 1.58 %   1.33 %   1.46 %   1.25 %
    Return on equity (ratio of net income to average equity) 11.97     10.52     11.26     10.73  
    Yield on earning assets 6.22     6.20     6.21     6.25  
    Rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities 2.61     2.73     2.67     2.94  
    Average interest rate spread 3.61     3.47     3.54     3.31  
    Net interest margin(2) 4.32     4.18     4.25     4.08  
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities 137.43     135.25     136.33     134.95  
    Noninterest expense to average total assets 2.87     2.84     2.85     2.76  
    Efficiency ratio 57.47     60.79     59.07     60.10  
    Efficiency ratio – adjusted(3) 58.59     60.29     59.43     60.36  

    (1)  Ratios are annualized where appropriate.
    (2)  Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
    (3)  See Non-GAAP reconciliations below for adjustments.

      At or For the Three Months Ended
      June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
    Asset quality ratios                  
    Nonperforming assets to total assets(1) 0.67 %   0.61 %   0.63 %   0.64 %   0.54 %
    Nonperforming loans to total loans(1) 0.81     0.74     0.76     0.78     0.68  
    Total classified assets to total assets 1.07     0.85     1.06     0.99     0.91  
    Allowance for credit losses to nonperforming loans(1) 147.98     165.96     163.68     166.51     194.80  
    Allowance for credit losses to total loans 1.20     1.23     1.24     1.30     1.33  
    Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized) 0.21     0.14     0.19     0.42     0.27  
    Capital ratios                  
    Equity to total assets at end of period 12.65 %   12.41 %   12.01 %   11.64 %   11.21 %
    Tangible equity to total tangible assets(2) 11.91     11.65     11.25     10.88     10.44  
    Average equity to average assets 13.20     12.66     12.28     12.02     11.78  

    (1)  Nonperforming assets include nonaccruing loans and repossessed assets. There were no accruing loans more than 90 days past due at the dates indicated. At June 30, 2025, $6.1 million, or 20.4%, of nonaccruing loans were current on their loan payments as of that date.
    (2)  See Non-GAAP reconciliations below for adjustments.


    Loans

    (Dollars in thousands) June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
    Commercial real estate                  
    Construction and land development $ 267,494     $ 247,539     $ 274,356     $ 300,905     $ 316,050  
    Commercial real estate – owner occupied   561,623       570,150       545,490       544,689       545,631  
    Commercial real estate – non-owner occupied   877,440       867,711       866,094       881,340       892,653  
    Multifamily   113,416       118,094       120,425       114,155       92,292  
    Total commercial real estate   1,819,973       1,803,494       1,806,365       1,841,089       1,846,626  
    Commercial                  
    Commercial and industrial   367,359       349,085       316,159       286,809       266,136  
    Equipment finance   360,499       380,166       406,400       443,033       461,010  
    Municipal leases   168,623       163,554       165,984       158,560       152,509  
    Total commercial   896,481       892,805       888,543       888,402       879,655  
    Residential real estate                  
    Construction and land development   53,020       56,858       53,683       63,016       70,679  
    One-to-four family   640,287       631,537       630,391       627,845       621,196  
    HELOCs   205,918       199,747       195,288       194,909       188,465  
    Total residential real estate   899,225       888,142       879,362       885,770       880,340  
    Consumer   56,272       64,168       74,029       83,631       94,833  
    Total loans, net of deferred loan fees and costs   3,671,951       3,648,609       3,648,299       3,698,892       3,701,454  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans   (44,139 )     (44,742 )     (45,285 )     (48,131 )     (49,223 )
    Loans, net $ 3,627,812     $ 3,603,867     $ 3,603,014     $ 3,650,761     $ 3,652,231  


    Deposits

    (Dollars in thousands) June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
    Core deposits                  
    Noninterest-bearing accounts $ 698,843     $ 721,814     $ 680,926     $ 684,501     $ 683,346  
    NOW accounts   561,524       573,745       575,238       534,517       561,789  
    Money market accounts   1,323,762       1,357,961       1,341,995       1,345,289       1,311,940  
    Savings accounts   179,980       184,396       181,317       179,762       185,499  
    Total core deposits   2,764,109       2,837,916       2,779,476       2,744,069       2,742,574  
    Certificates of deposit   902,069       898,444       999,727       1,017,519       965,205  
    Total $ 3,666,178     $ 3,736,360     $ 3,779,203     $ 3,761,588     $ 3,707,779  

    Non-GAAP Reconciliations
    In addition to results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles utilized in the United States (“GAAP”), this earnings release contains certain non-GAAP financial measures, which include: the efficiency ratio, tangible book value, tangible book value per share and the tangible equity to tangible assets ratio. The Company believes these non-GAAP financial measures and ratios as presented are useful for both investors and management to understand the effects of certain items and provide an alternative view of its performance over time and in comparison to its competitors. These non-GAAP measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for total stockholders’ equity or operating results determined in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

    Set forth below is a reconciliation to GAAP of the Company’s efficiency ratio:

        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
    (Dollars in thousands)   June 30, 2025   March 31, 2025   June 30, 2025   June 30, 2024
    Noninterest expense   $ 31,255     $ 30,961     $ 62,216     $ 60,619  
                     
    Net interest income   $ 44,229     $ 42,907     $ 87,136     $ 83,941  
    Plus: tax-equivalent adjustment     431       418       849       704  
    Plus: noninterest income     10,157       8,027       18,184       16,924  
    Less: BOLI death benefit proceeds in excess of cash surrender value     —       —       —       1,143  
    Less: gain on sale of branches     1,448       —       1,448       —  
    Less: gain (loss) on sale of premises and equipment     28       —       28       (9 )
    Net interest income plus noninterest income – adjusted   $ 53,341     $ 51,352     $ 104,693     $ 100,435  
    Efficiency ratio   57.47 %   60.79 %   59.07 %   60.10 %
    Efficiency ratio – adjusted   58.59 %   60.29 %   59.43 %   60.36 %

    Set forth below is a reconciliation to GAAP of tangible book value and tangible book value per share:

        As of
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)   June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
    Total stockholders’ equity   $ 579,274     $ 565,449     $ 551,758     $ 540,004     $ 523,628  
    Less: goodwill, core deposit intangibles, net of taxes     38,477       38,793       39,189       39,626       40,063  
    Tangible book value   $ 540,797     $ 526,656     $ 512,569     $ 500,378     $ 483,565  
    Common shares outstanding     17,492,143       17,552,626       17,527,709       17,514,922       17,437,326  
    Book value per share   $ 33.12     $ 32.21     $ 31.48     $ 30.83     $ 30.03  
    Tangible book value per share   $ 30.92     $ 30.00     $ 29.24     $ 28.57     $ 27.73  

    Set forth below is a reconciliation to GAAP of tangible equity to tangible assets:

        As of
    (Dollars in thousands)   June 30,
    2025
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
      September 30,
    2024
      June 30,
    2024
    Tangible equity(1)   $ 540,797     $ 526,656     $ 512,569     $ 500,378     $ 483,565  
    Total assets     4,578,053       4,558,060       4,595,430       4,637,293       4,670,864  
    Less: goodwill, core deposit intangibles, net of taxes     38,477       38,793       39,189       39,626       40,063  
    Total tangible assets   $ 4,539,576     $ 4,519,267     $ 4,556,241     $ 4,597,667     $ 4,630,801  
    Tangible equity to tangible assets   11.91 %   11.65 %   11.25 %   10.88 %   10.44 %

    (1)  Tangible equity (or tangible book value) is equal to total stockholders’ equity less goodwill and core deposit intangibles, net of related deferred tax liabilities.

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Brag House Files First Quarterly Report as Public Company Highlighting Strengthened Balance Sheet, Strategic Partnership with Learfield, and Platform Readiness for Fall Expansion

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Brag House Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: TBH) (“Brag House” or the “Company”), the Gen Z engagement platform operating at the intersection of gaming, college sports, and digital media, today announced the filing of its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. This is the Company’s first quarterly report since becoming a publicly listed company in March.

    The filing reflects significant balance sheet improvements following the Company’s initial public offering, as well as strategic positioning ahead of key growth initiatives scheduled for later this year.

    Key Highlights from the Q1 2025 Filing:

    • Strengthened Capital Position: As of March 31, 2025, the Company held $3.5 million in cash, bolstered by net proceeds from its IPO.
    • Convertible Debt Eliminated: All $6.6 million of convertible debt including accrued interest was eliminated through equity conversion, significantly strengthening the Company’s financial foundation.
    • Balance Sheet Turnaround: Brag House moved from a $8.5 million deficit to a $1.6 million surplus in stockholders’ equity during the quarter, reflecting strong investor confidence as evidenced by the Company’s IPO and the full exercise of the Overallotment option.

    “This quarter validates the strategy we set in motion leading up to our IPO,” said Lavell Juan Malloy II, CEO and Co-Founder of Brag House. “We’ve entered the public markets with a strong balance sheet and a clear plan for scaling revenue, data capabilities, and brand partnerships.”

    Strategic Partnership with Learfield Fuels Fall Activation

    In Q1, the Company secured a strategic partnership with Learfield Communications, the media and technology powerhouse in college athletics. Through this agreement, Brag House gains access to more than 200 NCAA collegiate properties, including premier football programs and student communities.

    Following several successful beta activations, including the inaugural Brag Gators Gauntlet at the University of Florida on May 17, 2025, Brag House is now preparing to launch the Brag Gators series this fall, aligned with the college football season.

    This partnership underpins the Company’s multi-layered revenue model and supports its evolution into a data-driven platform that delivers anonymized Gen Z behavioral insights to brand partners seeking to lower customer acquisition costs and optimize campaign engagement.

    Zacks Valuation Signals Upside Potential

    On July 9, 2025, Zacks Small-Cap Research initiated coverage on Brag House with a $4.40 valuation target — more than [6x] the Company’s current share price based on the closing price as of July 21, 2025. The report underscores Brag House’s differentiated Gen Z-first model and scalable growth potential.

    “We are honored to be recognized by Zacks for the strategic and structural foundation we’ve built,” added Malloy. “Like Zacks, we believe Brag House is uniquely positioned to scale into a $6.7 billion Total Addressable Market focused on Gen Z.”

    About Brag House

    Brag House is a leading media technology platform dedicated to transforming casual college gaming into a vibrant, community-driven experience. By merging gaming, social interaction, and collegiate culture, Brag House enables brands to authentically connect with the influential Gen Z demographic through gamified experiences, live-streaming content, and scalable data insights. For more information, visit www.braghouse.com.

    Media Contact
    Fatema Bhabrawala
    Director of Media Relations
    fbhabrawala@allianceadvisors.com

    Investor Relations Contact
    Adele Carey
    VP, Investor Relations
    ir@thebraghouse.com 

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Liberty Gold to Present at the Metals & Mining Virtual Investor Conference July 23, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Liberty Gold Corp. (TSX:LGD; OTCQX:LGDTF), (“Liberty Gold” or the “Company”), based in Vancouver, B.C. and focused on developing open pit oxide deposits in the Great Basin of the United States, today announced that Jon Gilligan, President and CEO, will present live at the Metals & Mining Virtual Investor Conference hosted by VirtualInvestorConferences.com on July 23, 2025.

    DATE: July 23, 2025
    TIME: 11:30AM ET
    LINK: REGISTER HERE
    Available for 1×1 meetings: July 23 and 24, 2025

    This will be a live, interactive online event where investors are invited to ask the company questions in real-time. If attendees are not able to join the event live on the day of the conference, an archived webcast will also be made available after the event.

    It is recommended that online investors pre-register and run the online system check to expedite participation and receive event updates.  

    Learn more about the event at www.virtualinvestorconferences.com.

    ABOUT LIBERTY GOLD
    Liberty Gold is focused on developing open pit oxide gold deposits in the Great Basin of the United States, home to large-scale gold projects that are ideally suited for open-pit mining and heap leach processing. This region is one of the most prolific gold-producing regions in the world and stretches across Nevada and into Idaho, Utah and Arizona. The Company is advancing the Black Pine Project in southeastern Idaho, a past-producing, Carlin-style oxide gold system with a large, growing resource and strong economic potential. We know the Great Basin and are driven to acquire, discover and develop significant gold deposits that can be mined profitably through open-pit heap leaching scenarios and in an environmentally responsible manner.

    About Virtual Investor Conferences®
    Virtual Investor Conferences (VIC) is the leading proprietary investor conference series that provides an interactive forum for publicly traded companies to seamlessly present directly to investors.

    Providing a real-time investor engagement solution, VIC is specifically designed to offer companies more efficient investor access. Replicating the components of an on-site investor conference, VIC offers companies enhanced capabilities to connect with investors, schedule targeted one-on-one meetings and enhance their presentations with dynamic video content. Accelerating the next level of investor engagement, Virtual Investor Conferences delivers leading investor communications to a global network of retail and institutional investors.

    CONTACTS:
    Susie Bell, Manager Investor Relations
    Liberty Gold Corp.
    Phone: 604-632-4677 or Toll Free 1-877-632-4677
    info@libertygold.ca
    For more information, visit libertygold.ca

    Virtual Investor Conferences
    John M. Viglotti
    SVP Corporate Services, Investor Access
    OTC Markets Group
    (212) 220-2221
    johnv@otcmarkets.com 

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Liberty Gold to Present at the Metals & Mining Virtual Investor Conference July 23, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Liberty Gold Corp. (TSX:LGD; OTCQX:LGDTF), (“Liberty Gold” or the “Company”), based in Vancouver, B.C. and focused on developing open pit oxide deposits in the Great Basin of the United States, today announced that Jon Gilligan, President and CEO, will present live at the Metals & Mining Virtual Investor Conference hosted by VirtualInvestorConferences.com on July 23, 2025.

    DATE: July 23, 2025
    TIME: 11:30AM ET
    LINK: REGISTER HERE
    Available for 1×1 meetings: July 23 and 24, 2025

    This will be a live, interactive online event where investors are invited to ask the company questions in real-time. If attendees are not able to join the event live on the day of the conference, an archived webcast will also be made available after the event.

    It is recommended that online investors pre-register and run the online system check to expedite participation and receive event updates.  

    Learn more about the event at www.virtualinvestorconferences.com.

    ABOUT LIBERTY GOLD
    Liberty Gold is focused on developing open pit oxide gold deposits in the Great Basin of the United States, home to large-scale gold projects that are ideally suited for open-pit mining and heap leach processing. This region is one of the most prolific gold-producing regions in the world and stretches across Nevada and into Idaho, Utah and Arizona. The Company is advancing the Black Pine Project in southeastern Idaho, a past-producing, Carlin-style oxide gold system with a large, growing resource and strong economic potential. We know the Great Basin and are driven to acquire, discover and develop significant gold deposits that can be mined profitably through open-pit heap leaching scenarios and in an environmentally responsible manner.

    About Virtual Investor Conferences®
    Virtual Investor Conferences (VIC) is the leading proprietary investor conference series that provides an interactive forum for publicly traded companies to seamlessly present directly to investors.

    Providing a real-time investor engagement solution, VIC is specifically designed to offer companies more efficient investor access. Replicating the components of an on-site investor conference, VIC offers companies enhanced capabilities to connect with investors, schedule targeted one-on-one meetings and enhance their presentations with dynamic video content. Accelerating the next level of investor engagement, Virtual Investor Conferences delivers leading investor communications to a global network of retail and institutional investors.

    CONTACTS:
    Susie Bell, Manager Investor Relations
    Liberty Gold Corp.
    Phone: 604-632-4677 or Toll Free 1-877-632-4677
    info@libertygold.ca
    For more information, visit libertygold.ca

    Virtual Investor Conferences
    John M. Viglotti
    SVP Corporate Services, Investor Access
    OTC Markets Group
    (212) 220-2221
    johnv@otcmarkets.com 

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Ambiq Launches Two New Edge AI Runtime Solutions

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    AUSTIN, Texas, July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Ambiq Micro, Inc. (“Ambiq”), a technology leader in ultra-low-power semiconductor solutions for edge AI, today unveils HeliosRT (Runtime) and HeliosAOT (Ahead-of-Time), two new edge AI runtime solutions optimized for the Ambiq Apollo Systems-on-Chip (SoCs) family. These developer tools are designed to significantly enhance the performance and energy efficiency of AI models for the unique demands of edge computing environments.

    Addressing Critical Edge AI Challenges

    As AI workloads increasingly migrate to edge devices, developers face growing pressure to deliver high performance within strict power budgets. Traditional AI frameworks often struggle in ultra-low-power scenarios, making it difficult to deploy sophisticated AI models in battery-powered devices, such as wearables, hearables, IoT sensors, and industrial monitors.

    Ambiq’s new runtime solutions expand its growing portfolio of developer-centric tools, designed to help engineers unlock the full potential of Apollo SoCs. HeliosRT and HeliosAOT offer flexible, high-performance deployment options for edge AI across a wide range of applications, from digital health and smart homes to industrial automation and beyond.

    HeliosRT: Power-Optimized LiteRT

    HeliosRT is a performance-enhanced implementation of LiteRT (formerly TensorFlow Lite for Microcontrollers) that is tailored for energy-constrained environments. Fully compatible with existing TensorFlow workflows, HeliosRT introduces key improvements:

    • Custom AI kernels optimized for Apollo510’s vector acceleration hardware
    • Improved numeric support for audio and speech processing models
    • Up to 3x gains in inference speed and power efficiency over standard LiteRT implementations

    HeliosAOT: Compiling LiteRT to Optimized C Code

    HeliosAOT introduces a ground-up, ahead-of-time compiler that transforms TensorFlow Lite models directly into embedded C code for edge AI deployment. This innovative approach offers runtime-level, or better, performance with additional benefits:

    • 15–50% reduction in memory footprint versus traditional runtime-based deployments
    • Granular memory control, enabling per-layer weight distribution across Apollo’s memory hierarchy
    • Streamlined deployment, with direct integration of generated C code into embedded applications
    • Greater flexibility for resource-constrained systems

    “The intersection of developer experience and power efficiency is our north star,” said Carlos Morales, VP of AI at Ambiq. “HeliosRT and HeliosAOT are designed to integrate seamlessly with existing AI development pipelines while delivering the performance and efficiency gains that edge applications demand. We believe this is a major step forward in making sophisticated AI truly ubiquitous.”

    Powered by SPOT® and Real-World Success

    Both Helios solutions are built on Ambiq’s patented Sub-threshold Power Optimized Technology (SPOT), which is the foundation behind over 270 million devices deployed worldwide. Leveraging years of hardware-software co-design, these tools deliver measurable performance gains and streamlined deployment for developers targeting the edge.

    Availability

    • HeliosRT is available now in beta via the neuralSPOT SDK, with general release expected in Q3 2025
    • HeliosAOT is currently available as a technical preview for select partners, with wider availability planned for Q4 2025

    Both solutions are supported with robust documentation, ready-to-use examples, and dedicated engineering assistance for Ambiq customers.

    About Ambiq

    Ambiq’s mission is to enable intelligence (artificial intelligence (AI) and beyond) everywhere by delivering the lowest power semiconductor solutions. Ambiq enables its customers to deliver AI compute at the edge where power consumption challenges are the most profound. Ambiq’s technology innovations, built on the patented and proprietary sub-threshold power optimized technology (SPOT), fundamentally deliver a multi-fold improvement in power consumption over traditional semiconductor designs. Ambiq has powered over 270 million devices to date. For more information, visit www.ambiq.com.

    Contact
    Charlene Wan
    VP of Corporate Marketing and Investor Relations
    cwan@ambiq.com
    +1.512.879.2850

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/5265c973-0202-4e66-b9df-47fff71759ea

    The MIL Network –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: City of Wanneroo adopts 2025/26 budget

    Source: South Australia Police

    The City of Wanneroo has adopted its 2025/26 budget, prioritising a range of services and facilities to keep our community connected, safe and sustainable.

    Council adopted a 3.5 per cent rate increase across all rating categories, and a 3 per cent increase for residential ratepayers which amounts to less than $1 per week for most homeowners.

    Mayor Linda Aitken said the $353.4 million budget included a $132.6 million capital works program and investment in a range of community services and facilities to benefit all residents.

    “We are committed to providing the programs, services, facilities and infrastructure our community needs and expects, while remaining mindful of the cost-of-living challenges people are facing,” she said.

    “As one of Australia’s fastest-growing local government areas, we have a duty to ensure value for money for our ratepayers. Half of this year’s budget is funded from sources beyond rates, thanks to strong partnerships and a strategic focus on alternative revenue streams.”

    “The City looks forward to delivering on this budget and continuing to build a thriving, inclusive and sustainable City for the generations to come.”

    2025/26 capital works program highlights

    Community recreation and facilities

    Over the next 12 months, the City will spend $60.9 million on upgrades to existing sporting facilities and the construction of new facilities to ensure local families and sporting clubs can stay healthy, active and connected.

    This includes $48.9 million to progress the construction of the Alkimos Aquatic and Recreation Centre.

    A $1.3 million investment will progress the design of a new sports hub for the Wanneroo Recreation Centre, a further $470,000 will progress a new amenities building at Abbeville Park in Mindarie, and $230,000 for an extension to the existing Wanneroo Showgrounds Clubrooms.

    Construction of the highly anticipated Dordaak Kepup library and youth innovation hub is scheduled for completion, with the $18 million Landsdale facility set to open its doors in December 2025.

    $1.6 million will support upgrades to Gumblossom Community Centre in Quinns Rocks, Yanchep Community Centre, Carramar Community and Butler Community Centre.

    An additional $1 million will support the Girrawheen Hub Redevelopment project.

    Waste management

    We’ve allocated $4.4 million to support more sustainable and efficient waste management processes. Funding will progress the development of a recycling centre in Neerabup and waste transfer stations in Neerabup and Wangara.

    Community safety

    We’re investing $3.7 million to community safety measures this year, including $1.6 million to upgrade the Two Rocks Bush Fire Brigade.

    We’ll also spend $1.6 million to commence detailed design for the Wanneroo Emergency Services Precinct, to ensure the City is better prepared for bushfires and other emergencies.

    Parks, playgrounds and pathways

    We’re committing $6.7 million towards park and playground upgrades, to ensure the community can enjoy our City’s natural environment. This work will include replacing playground equipment, shade structures, picnic shelters, barbecues and drink fountains.

    A $515,000 investment will provide new play spaces at Rotary Park, and $320,000 will complete the construction of new toilet facilities at Amery Park in Hocking.

    We’ve allocated $6.7 million to new and upgraded pathways and trails across the City, including new shared paths in Alexander Heights and from Butler to Alkimos Station.

    A further $815,000 will provide pathway lighting at Kingsbridge, Chesterfield, Brampton, Lighthouse and Delamere parks.

    Local roads

    With a focus on creating a safe and connected City, we’ve allocated $18.2 million this year to road upgrades and traffic treatments.

    This includes $4.8 million for Flynn Drive upgrades between Mather Drive and Old Yanchep Road.

    We’re also spending $1.3 million on upgrades to the intersection of Marangaroo Drive and Girrawheen Avenue, and $750,000 on the construction of a dual carriageway between Marmion Avenue to Spinnaker Boulevard on Yanchep Beach Road.

    In additional to the budget, the City is launching a new online payment portal this August, providing residents with a more flexible and user-friendly way to manage their rates.

    The portal offers a variety of automated payment options, such as weekly, fortnightly or monthly direct debit payments, depending on what suits your budget.

    For more information on the City’s 2025/26 budget and or the online payment portal, visit wanneroo.wa.gov.au/budget.

    Please note, some figures have been rounded to nearest decimal whole number.

     

    MIL OSI News –

    July 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Nigel Topping CMG appointed Chair of the Climate Change Committee

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    Nigel Topping CMG appointed Chair of the Climate Change Committee

    Nigel Topping CMG has been appointed as Chair of the Climate Change Committee.

    Nigel Topping CMG has been appointed as Chair of the Climate Change Committee (CCC) by the UK and devolved governments today (22 July). 

    This follows the Secretary of State, Ed Miliband, and the Northern Irish, Welsh and Scottish devolved government Ministers selecting Nigel Topping as the preferred candidate for the role, as well as a successful pre-appointment hearing in front of the Energy Security and Net Zero and Environmental Audit Committees on Wednesday 16 July.   

    The Energy Secretary has written to Nigel Topping to confirm his appointment, welcoming him to the role and confirming his confidence in him to lead the Climate Change Committee. He has also written to Professor Piers Forster, to thank him for his leadership as interim Chair of the CCC following Lord Deben’s departure in 2023. 

    The Chair will play a key role in the committee’s work of advising government on the delivery of its carbon budgets, with a critical few years ahead as the government accelerates to net zero as part of its clean energy superpower mission. 

    Energy Secretary, Ed Miliband, said: 

    I want to congratulate Nigel Topping on his appointment as Chair of the Climate Change Committee.  

    We highly value the Climate Change Committee’s independent advice on how we can achieve net zero, so I am thrilled to have Nigel in this important role – as he brings extensive experience, including from his time serving as the UN High Level Climate Action Champion for COP26.  

    Net zero is the economic opportunity of the 21st century and Nigel’s business expertise will help us to maximise on this opportunity as we deliver our clean energy superpower mission – boosting energy security, creating good jobs, bringing down bills and tackling the climate crisis.

    Nigel Topping, Chair of the Climate Change Committee, said: 

    It is an honour to be appointed Chair of the Climate Change Committee at this pivotal moment. The UK has an opportunity to deliver on its climate commitments in a way that reduces costs for households, powers our industries forward, and makes our economy more successful. It’s also important to ensure resilience against growing climate impacts and I look forward to working with Baroness Brown who leads our adaptation work.    

    I’d like to offer my sincere thanks to Professor Piers Forster, who has been our interim Chair since Lord Deben stepped down. He has led the Committee through an incredibly busy period overseeing advice on the UK’s Seventh Carbon Budget, three devolved carbon budgets, and a number of key progress reports to government.   

    I am committed to upholding the rigour and independent nature of the Committee’s advice, while harnessing our country’s wealth of scientific, financial and business talent.

    Nigel Topping’s selection follows a competitive recruitment process in line with the Governance Code for Public Appointments. 

    Notes to Editors

    The UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government, and Northern Ireland Executive agreed to appoint Nigel Topping. The decision-making Ministers were: 

    • Ed Miliband MP, Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero 

    • Andrew Muir MLA, Minister of Agriculture, Environment, and Rural Affairs, Northern Ireland Executive 

    • Gillian Martin MSP, Cabinet Secretary for Climate Action and Energy, Scottish Government 

    • Huw Irranca-Davies MS, Deputy First Minister of Wales and Cabinet Secretary for Climate Change and Rural Affairs, Welsh Government 

    Nigel Topping’s term as Chair will begin on Wednesday 23 July.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 22 July 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Leeds aquatics team success brings home international medals

    Source: City of Leeds

    Leeds City Council’s aquatic training scheme has brought home six medals from the European Junior Championships that took place earlier this month.

    Five swimmers got selected from Leeds for the championship this year, more than from any other programme and the highest number Leeds has had selected since 2008.

    The team brought home three gold, one silver and two bronze medals.

    As a result of their great performances Daniel Ransom and Gabriel Shepherd have also been selected for the World Aquatics Junior Championships in August, where they will represent Great Britain amongst some of the strongest junior swimmers from across the world. 

    The aquatics scheme at John Charles Centre for Sport has cemented itself as the leading aquatics programme in Great Britain, providing more athletes to Great Britain’s world class programmes and the England national performance and talent programmes than any other aquatics programme.

    Councillor Salma Arif, executive member for adult social care, active lifestyles, and culture, said: “I want to say congratulations to the whole team who competed in the European Junior Championships, what an achievement.

    “We are very proud of our aquatics training scheme and it’s wonderful to see that the hard work of the coaches and the athletes continues to pay off year after year.”

    Jamie Fowler, group coach at Leeds City Council’s swim training scheme, said: “I would like to thank Active Leeds, Leeds City Council and the City of Leeds Swimming Club for the support that is provided for competitive swimming in the city.

    “To have five swimmers at European Junior level is a fantastic achievement and is more than any other programme in Britian. It’s a true testament to how strong our age group and youth development programme is.”

    List of medals:

    Gabriel Shepherd

    • Bronze Men’s 4×100 Freestyle Relay 
    • Silver Mixed 4×100 Freestyle Relay 
    • Gold Men’s 4×100 Medley Relay 

    Hollie Wilson

    • Bronze Women’s 4×200 Freestyle Relay 

    Daniel Ransom

    • Gold Mixed 4×100 Medley Relay 
    • Gold Men’s 4×100 Medley Relay 

    ENDS

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: A member of the RUDN construction team told how the third work shift is going

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Peoples’Friendship University of Russia –

    An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Every weekday morning, Jean-Pierre Tsishugi Bisimva, a member of the RUDN Meridian Druzhby construction team, comes to the assembly line at 8:45 a.m. before the start of the work day. He works as a painter in the 11th block of the dormitory. Before this summer, he had never had to paint anything, but in three weeks he has already learned a lot.

    His experience working in a repair crew will definitely be useful to him in the future. After all, Jean-Pierre came to Russia from the Democratic Republic of Congo and graduated from the preparatory faculty to enroll in the RUDN Engineering Academy in the Construction program. He will begin his studies on September 1, but in the meantime, he is gaining useful practical skills in advance.

    “In the morning, we discuss the work plan for the day, and then we go to our site. I have a wonderful supervisor who is always ready to give professional advice and just suggest something on personal issues. I got used to the work faster than I thought, learned how to paint walls, stairs, radiators. To make it look prettier and more even, we use tape to separate the borders between colors and to avoid painting too much,” Jean-Pierre Tsishugi Bisimva (Construction, 1st year).

    Insidious paints

    Jean-Pierre already has not only useful knowledge and skills “under his belt”, but also a funny story about his colleague from the construction team.

    “He also worked as a painter, but he didn’t know much about paint. When he had to work in the bathroom, he didn’t cover the floor with anything to protect the surface from the oil paint that was dripping off the walls. This was because he thought that all paints were the same and could be easily washed off after work. As a result, my friend spent a long time cleaning the floor, and it was difficult to do. And that’s why we are always advised to use protective bags, film or cardboard to cover surfaces and keep the work area clean,” Jean-Pierre Tsishugi Bisimwa (Construction, 1st year).

    Concerts on Fridays

    The construction team members work from 09:00 to 18:00, with a lunch break. They go to the university cafeteria to recharge their batteries or bring food with them. In the evening, they hand over their completed work to the foreman and go home to rest and tidy up their work uniforms so that they are clean and ready for the new day. However, they are not always in a hurry to part with each other after checking in with the foreman.

    “We have a friendly, even family-like atmosphere. On Wednesdays we play football. And on Fridays we organize concerts where everyone can demonstrate their talents: sing, dance, play the guitar. In addition, excursions are organized for us. We have already seen the iconic places of Moscow, learned about its history and architecture,” – Jean-Pierre Tsishugi Bisimva (Construction, 1st year).

    At the end of July and in August, students will also be able to compete for the titles of “Miss and Mister of the Construction Team”. Who knows, maybe Jean-Pierre will receive the title of “Mister”? Time will tell.

    The third semester of the RUDN construction team “Meridian of Friendship” started on June 27. In total, more than 190 students from 55 countries are taking part in it.

    They were divided into two work areas: “Atlantes” are engaged in the improvement of student dormitories, and the guys from “Prometheus” are repairing classrooms, laboratories and sports areas of the university. The teams will work for two months.

    Please note: This information is raw content obtained directly from the source of the information. It is an accurate report of what the source claims and does not necessarily reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    .

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    July 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Capital City Bank Group, Inc. Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TALLAHASSEE, Fla., July 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCBG) today reported net income attributable to common shareowners of $15.0 million, or $0.88 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2025 compared to $16.9 million, or $0.99 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2025, and $14.2 million, or $0.83 per diluted share, for the second quarter of 2024.

    QUARTER HIGHLIGHTS (2ndQuarter 2025 versus 1stQuarter 2025)

    Income Statement

    • Tax-equivalent net interest income totaled $43.2 million compared to $41.6 million for the first quarter of 2025
      • Net interest margin increased eight basis points to 4.30% (earning asset yield increased by six basis points and cost of funds decreased two basis points to 82 basis points)
    • Provision for credit losses decreased by $0.1 million to $0.6 million for the second quarter – net loan charge-offs were comparable to the first quarter of 2025 at nine basis points (annualized) of average loans – allowance coverage ratio increased to 1.13% at June 30, 2025
    • Noninterest income increased by $0.1 million, or 0.5%, reflecting higher deposit and bankcard fees as well as mortgage fees partially offset by lower wealth management fees
    • Noninterest expense increased by $3.8 million, or 9.9%, primarily due to a $3.9 million net gain from the sale of our operations center building (reflected in other expense) in the first quarter of 2025

    Balance Sheet

    • Loan balances decreased by $13.3 million, or 0.5% (average), and decreased by $29.3 million, or 1.1% (end of period)
    • Deposit balances increased by $15.2 million, or 0.4% (average), and decreased by $79.0 million, or 2.1% (end of period) due to the seasonal decrease in our public fund balances
      • Noninterest bearing deposits averaged 36.5% of total deposits for the second quarter and 36.2% for the year
    • Tangible book value per diluted share (non-GAAP financial measure) increased by $0.78, or 3.2%

    “Capital City delivered another strong quarter, highlighted by sustained revenue growth and continued credit strength,” said William G. Smith, Jr, Capital City Bank Group Chairman and CEO. “Our second quarter results reflect a 3.9% increase in net interest income and an 8 basis point expansion in the net interest margin to 4.30%. Tangible book value per share increased by 3.2%, and we further strengthened our capital position, with our tangible capital ratio increasing to 10.1%. We remain focused on executing strategies that drive consistent, profitable growth, supported by a fortress balance sheet that provides resilience and strategic flexibility.”                          

    Discussion of Operating Results

    Net Interest Income/Net Interest Margin

    Tax-equivalent net interest income for the second quarter of 2025 totaled $43.2 million compared to $41.6 million for the first quarter of 2025 and $39.3 million for the second quarter of 2024. Compared to the first quarter of 2025, the increase was driven by a $0.9 million increase in investment securities income and a $0.4 million increase in overnight funds income. One additional calendar day in the second quarter of 2025 contributed to the increase. Compared to the second quarter of 2024, the increase was primarily due to a $2.7 million increase in investment securities income and a $1.2 million decrease in deposit interest expense. New investment purchases at higher yields drove the increase in investment securities income for both prior period comparisons. Further, the decrease in deposit interest expense from the prior year period reflected the gradual decrease in our deposit rates, as short term rates began declining in the second half of 2024.

    For the first six months of 2025, tax-equivalent net interest income totaled $84.8 million compared to $77.8 million for the same period of 2024 with the increase primarily attributable to a $4.2 million increase in investment securities income, a $1.9 million increase in overnight funds income, and a $1.4 million decrease in deposit interest expense. New investment purchases at higher yields drove the increase in investment securities income. Higher average deposit balances contributed to the increase in overnight funds income. The decrease in deposit interest expense reflected the aforementioned decrease in our deposit rates.

    Our net interest margin for the second quarter of 2025 was 4.30%, an increase of eight basis points over the first quarter of 2025 and an increase of 28 basis points over the second quarter of 2024. For the month of June 2025, our net interest margin was 4.36%. For the first six months of 2025, our net interest margin increased by 25 basis points to 4.26% compared to the same period of 2024. The increase in net interest margin over all prior periods reflected a higher yield in the investment portfolio driven by new purchases at higher yields. Lower deposit cost also contributed to the improvement over both prior year periods. For the second quarter of 2025, our cost of funds was 82 basis points, a decrease of two basis points from the first quarter of 2025 and a 15-basis point decrease from the second quarter of 2024. Our cost of deposits (including noninterest bearing accounts) was 81 basis points, 82 basis points, and 95 basis points, respectively, for the same periods.

    Provision for Credit Losses

    We recorded a provision expense for credit losses of $0.6 million for the second quarter of 2025 compared to $0.8 million for the first quarter of 2025 and $1.2 million for the second quarter of 2024. For the first six months of 2025, we recorded a provision expense for credit losses of $1.4 million compared to $2.1 million for the first six months of 2024. Activity within the components of the provision (loans held for investment (“HFI”) and unfunded loan commitments) for each reported period is provided in the table on page 14. We discuss the various factors that impacted our provision expense for Loans HFI in further detail below under the heading Allowance for Credit Losses.

    Noninterest Income and Noninterest Expense

    Noninterest income for the second quarter of 2025 totaled $20.0 million compared to $19.9 million for the first quarter of 2025 and $19.6 million for the second quarter of 2024. The $0.1 million, or 0.5%, increase over the first quarter of 2025 was primarily due to a $0.4 million increase in mortgage banking revenues and a $0.3 million increase in deposit fees, partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease in wealth management fees. The increase in mortgage revenues was driven by an increase in production volume. Fee adjustments made late in the second quarter of 2025 led to the increase in deposit fees. The decrease in wealth management fees was attributable to a decrease in insurance commission revenue. Compared to the second quarter of 2024, the $0.4 million, or 2.1%, increase was primarily due to a $0.8 million increase in wealth management fees, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in mortgage banking revenues and a $0.1 million decrease in other income. The increase in wealth management fees reflected a $0.5 million increase in trust fees and a $0.4 million increase in retail brokerage fees, partially offset by a $0.1 million decrease in insurance commission revenue. A combination of new business, higher account valuations, and fee increases implemented in early 2025 drove the improvement in trust and retail brokerage fees.

    For the first six months of 2025, noninterest income totaled $39.9 million compared to $37.7 million for the same period of 2024, primarily attributable to a $1.8 million increase in wealth management fees and a $0.7 million increase in mortgage banking revenues that was partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in deposit fees. The increase in wealth management fees reflected increases in retail brokerage fees of $1.0 million, trust fees of $0.7 million, and insurance commission revenue of $0.1 million. The increases in retail brokerage and trust fees were attributable to a combination of new business, higher account valuations, and fee increases implemented in early 2025. The increase in mortgage banking revenues was due to a higher gain on sale margin.   

    Noninterest expense for the second quarter of 2025 totaled $42.5 million compared to $38.7 million for the first quarter of 2025 and $40.4 million for the second quarter of 2024. The $3.8 million, or 9.9%, increase over the first quarter of 2025, reflected a $3.3 million increase in other expense, a $0.3 million increase in occupancy expense, and a $0.2 million increase in compensation expense. The increase in other expense was driven by a $4.5 million increase in other real estate expense which reflected lower gains from the sale of banking facilities, primarily the sale of our operations center building in the first quarter of 2025, partially offset by a $0.5 million decrease in charitable contribution expense and a $0.6 million decrease in miscellaneous expense. The slight increase in occupancy expense was due to higher software maintenance agreement expense and maintenance/repairs for buildings and furniture/fixtures. The slight increase in compensation expense reflected a $0.1 million increase in salary expense and a $0.1 million increase in associate benefit expense.   Compared to the second quarter of 2024, the $2.1 million, or 5.2%, increase was primarily due to a $2.1 million increase in compensation expense which reflected a $1.3 million increase in salary expense and a $0.8 million increase in associate benefit expense. The increase in salary expense was primarily due to increases in incentive plan expense of $0.9 million and base salaries of $0.4 million (merit based). The increase in associate benefit expense was attributable to a $0.6 million increase in associate insurance expense and a $0.2 million increase in stock compensation expense.

    For the first six months of 2025, noninterest expense totaled $81.2 million compared to $80.6 million for the same period of 2024 with the $0.6 million, or 0.8%, increase due to a $3.9 million increase in compensation expense that was partially offset by a $3.2 million decrease in other expense and a $0.1 million decrease in occupancy expense. The increase in compensation was due to a $2.5 million increase in salary expense and a $1.4 million increase in associate benefit expense. The increase in salary expense was primarily due to increases in incentive plan expense of $1.2 million, base salaries of $0.9 million (merit based), and commissions of $0.7 million (retail brokerage and mortgage). The increase in associate benefit expense was attributable to a higher cost for associate insurance. The decrease in other expense was primarily due to a $4.5 million decrease in other real estate expense due to lower gains from the sale of banking facilities, and a $1.0 million decrease in miscellaneous expense (non-service component of pension expense), partially offset by increases in processing expense of $1.1 million (outsource of core processing system), charitable contribution expense of $0.7 million, and professional fees of $0.5 million.

    Income Taxes

    We realized income tax expense of $5.0 million (effective rate of 24.9%) for the second quarter of 2025 compared to $5.1 million (effective rate of 23.3%) for the first quarter of 2025 and $3.2 million (effective rate of 18.5%) for the second quarter of 2024. For the first six months of 2025, we realized income tax expense of $10.1 million (effective rate of 24.1%) compared to $6.7 million (effective rate of 20.6%) for the same period of 2024. A lower level of tax benefit accrued from a solar tax credit equity fund drove the increase in our effective tax rate for all prior period comparisons. Absent discrete items or new tax credit investments, we expect our annual effective tax rate to approximate 24% for 2025.

    Discussion of Financial Condition

    Earning Assets

    Average earning assets totaled $4.032 billion for the second quarter of 2025, an increase of $38.1 million, or 1.0%, over the first quarter of 2025, and an increase of $110.1 million, or 2.8%, over the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase over both prior periods was driven by higher average deposit balances (see below – Deposits). Compared to the first quarter of 2025, the change in the earning asset mix reflected a $27.8 million increase in overnight funds and a $25.7 million increase in investment securities that was partially offset by a $13.3 million decrease in loans HFI and a $2.1 million decrease in loans held for sale (“HFS”). Compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, the change in the earning asset mix reflected a $92.8 million increase in investment securities and a $50.5 million increase in overnight funds sold partially offset by a $24.8 million decrease in loans HFI and a $8.4 million decrease in loans HFS.

    Average loans HFI decreased by $13.3 million, or 0.5%, from the first quarter of 2025 and decreased by $24.8 million, or 0.9%, from the fourth quarter of 2024. Compared to the first quarter of 2025, the decrease was due to decreases in construction loans of $24.6 million, consumer loans (primarily indirect auto) of $1.9 million, and commercial loans of $3.4 million, partially offset by increases to residential real estate loans of $10.2 million, commercial real estate loans of $2.1 million, and home equity loans of $4.1 million. Compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, the decline was primarily attributable to decreases in construction loans of $33.2 million, commercial loans of $9.2 million, and consumer loans (primarily indirect auto) of $4.0 million, partially offset by increases in home equity loans of $10.8 million, residential real estate loans of $9.9 million, and commercial real estate loans of $1.9 million.

    Loans HFI at June 30, 2025 decreased by $29.3 million, or 1.1%, from March 31, 2025 and decreased by $20.1 million, or 0.8%, from December 31, 2024. Compared to the first quarter of 2025, the decline was primarily due to decreases in construction loans of $18.2 million, consumer loans (primarily indirect auto) of $8.7 million, commercial loans of $4.4 million, and commercial real estate loans of $4.4 million, partially offset by increases in residential real estate loans of $5.8 million and home equity loans of $2.2 million. Compared to December 31, 2024, the decrease was primarily attributable to decreases in construction loans of $45.9 million, commercial loans of $9.2 million, and consumer loans (primarily indirect auto) of $2.0 million, partially offset by increases in commercial real estate loans of $23.4 million, residential real estate loans of $17.9 million, and home equity loans of $8.1 million.

    Allowance for Credit Losses

    At June 30, 2025, the allowance for credit losses for loans HFI totaled $29.9 million compared to $29.7 million at March 31, 2025 and $29.3 million at December 31, 2024. Activity within the allowance is provided on Page 14. The slight increase in the allowance over March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 was primarily attributable to qualitative factor adjustments that were partially offset by lower loan balances. Net loan charge-offs for both the second quarter of 2025 and the first quarter of 2025 were comparable at nine basis points of average loans. At June 30, 2025, the allowance represented 1.13% of loans HFI compared to 1.12% at March 31, 2025, and 1.10% at December 31, 2024.

    Credit Quality

    Nonperforming assets (nonaccrual loans and other real estate) totaled $6.6 million at June 30, 2025 compared to $4.4 million at March 31, 2025 and $6.7 million at December 31, 2024. At June 30, 2025, nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets was 0.15%, compared to 0.10% at March 31, 2025 and 0.15% at December 31, 2024. Nonaccrual loans totaled $6.4 million at June 30, 2025, a $2.2 million increase over March 31, 2025 and a $0.1 million increase over December 31, 2024 with the increase over the first quarter of 2025 primarily attributable to two home equity loans totaling $1.8 million. Classified loans totaled $28.6 million at June 30, 2025, a $9.4 million increase over March 31, 2025 and a $8.7 million increase over December 31, 2024. The increase over the prior periods was primarily due to the downgrade of four residential real estate loans totaling $4.2 million and two commercial real estate loans totaling $4.3 million.

    Deposits

    Average total deposits were $3.681 billion for the second quarter of 2025, an increase of $15.2 million, or 0.4%, over the first quarter of 2025 and an increase of $80.3 million, or 2.2%, over the fourth quarter of 2024.   Compared to the first quarter of 2025, the increase was attributable to higher core deposit balances (primarily noninterest bearing checking and money market), partially offset by a decline in public funds balances (primarily NOW accounts) due to the seasonal reduction in those balances. The increase over the fourth quarter of 2024 reflected strong growth in core deposit balances and a seasonal increase in public funds balances (primarily NOW) which are received/deposited by those clients starting in December and peak on average in the first quarter.

    At June 30, 2025, total deposits were $3.705 billion, a decrease of $79.0 million, or 2.1%, from March 31, 2025, and an increase of $32.9 million, or 0.9%, over December 31, 2024. The decrease from March 31, 2025 was primarily due to a seasonal decline in public funds balances, (primarily money market and noninterest bearing). The increase over December 31, 2024 reflected higher core deposit balances, primarily noninterest bearing accounts. Public funds totaled $596.6 million at June 30, 2025, $648.0 million at March 31, 2025, and $660.9 million at December 31, 2024.

    Liquidity

    We maintained an average net overnight funds (i.e., deposits with banks plus FED funds sold less FED funds purchased) sold position of $348.8 million in the second quarter of 2025 compared to $320.9 million in the first quarter of 2025 and $298.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. Compared to both prior periods, the increase reflected higher average deposits and lower average loans.

    At June 30, 2025, we had the ability to generate approximately $1.603 billion (excludes overnight funds position of $395 million) in additional liquidity through various sources including various federal funds purchased lines, Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, the Federal Reserve Discount Window, and brokered deposits.

    We also view our investment portfolio as a liquidity source, as we have the option to pledge securities in our portfolio as collateral for borrowings or deposits and/or to sell selected securities in our portfolio. Our portfolio consists of debt issued by the U.S. Treasury, U.S. governmental agencies, municipal governments, and corporate entities. At June 30, 2025, the weighted-average maturity and duration of our portfolio were 2.66 years and 2.14 years, respectively, and the available-for-sale portfolio had a net unrealized after-tax loss of $13.4 million.

    Capital

    Shareowners’ equity was $526.4 million at June 30, 2025 compared to $512.6 million at March 31, 2025 and $495.3 million at December 31, 2024. For the first six months of 2025, shareowners’ equity was positively impacted by net income attributable to shareowners of $31.9 million, a net $5.5 million decrease in the accumulated other comprehensive loss, the issuance of common stock of $2.8 million, and stock compensation accretion of $0.9 million. The net favorable change in accumulated other comprehensive loss reflected a $6.4 million decrease in the investment securities loss that was partially offset by a $0.9 million decrease in the fair value of the interest rate swap related to subordinated debt. Shareowners’ equity was reduced by common stock dividends of $8.2 million ($0.48 per share) and net adjustments totaling $1.8 million related to transactions under our stock compensation plans.

    At June 30, 2025, our total risk-based capital ratio was 19.60% compared to 19.20% at March 31, 2025 and 18.64% at December 31, 2024. Our common equity tier 1 capital ratio was 16.81%, 16.08%, and 15.54%, respectively, on these dates. Our leverage ratio was 11.14%, 11.17%, and 11.05%, respectively, on these dates. At June 30, 2025, all our regulatory capital ratios exceeded the thresholds to be designated as “well-capitalized” under the Basel III capital standards. Further, our tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP financial measure) was 10.09% at June 30, 2025 compared to 9.61% and 9.51% at March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively. If the unrealized loss for held-to-maturity securities of $9.9 million (after-tax) was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, our adjusted tangible capital ratio would be 9.86%.

    About Capital City Bank Group, Inc.

    Capital City Bank Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: CCBG) is one of the largest publicly traded financial holding companies headquartered in Florida and has approximately $4.4 billion in assets. We provide a full range of banking services, including traditional deposit and credit services, mortgage banking, asset management, trust, merchant services, bankcards, securities brokerage services, and financial advisory services, including the sale of life insurance, risk management and asset protection services. Our bank subsidiary, Capital City Bank, was founded in 1895 and now has 62 banking offices and 107 ATMs/ITMs in Florida, Georgia and Alabama. For more information about Capital City Bank Group, Inc., visit https://www.ccbg.com/.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    Forward-looking statements in this Press Release are based on current plans and expectations that are subject to uncertainties and risks, which could cause our future results to differ materially. The words “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “target,” “vision,” “goal,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The following factors, among others, could cause our actual results to differ: the effects of and changes in trade and monetary and fiscal policies and laws, including the interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve Board; inflation, interest rate, market and monetary fluctuations; local, regional, national, and international economic conditions and the impact they may have on us and our clients and our assessment of that impact; the costs and effects of legal and regulatory developments, the outcomes of legal proceedings or regulatory or other governmental inquiries, the results of regulatory examinations or reviews and the ability to obtain required regulatory approvals; the effect of changes in laws and regulations (including laws and regulations concerning taxes, banking, securities, and insurance) and their application with which we and our subsidiaries must comply; the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies, as well as other accounting standard setters; the accuracy of our financial statement estimates and assumptions; changes in the financial performance and/or condition of our borrowers; changes in the mix of loan geographies, sectors and types or the level of non-performing assets and charge-offs; changes in estimates of future credit loss reserve requirements based upon the periodic review thereof under relevant regulatory and accounting requirements; changes in our liquidity position; the timely development and acceptance of new products and services and perceived overall value of these products and services by users; changes in consumer spending, borrowing, and saving habits; greater than expected costs or difficulties related to the integration of new products and lines of business; technological changes; the costs and effects of cyber incidents or other failures, interruptions, or security breaches of our systems or those of our customers or third-party providers; acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses; impairment of our goodwill or other intangible assets; changes in the reliability of our vendors, internal control systems, or information systems; our ability to increase market share and control expenses; our ability to attract and retain qualified employees; changes in our organization, compensation, and benefit plans; the soundness of other financial institutions; volatility and disruption in national and international financial and commodity markets; changes in the competitive environment in our markets and among banking organizations and other financial service providers; government intervention in the U.S. financial system; the effects of natural disasters (including hurricanes), widespread health emergencies (including pandemics), military conflict, terrorism, civil unrest, climate change or other geopolitical events; our ability to declare and pay dividends; structural changes in the markets for origination, sale and servicing of residential mortgages; any inability to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and/or disclosure control; negative publicity and the impact on our reputation; and the limited trading activity and concentration of ownership of our common stock. Additional factors can be found in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and our other filings with the SEC, which are available at the SEC’s internet site (https://www.sec.gov). Forward-looking statements in this Press Release speak only as of the date of the Press Release, and we assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements or the reasons why actual results could differ, except as may be required by law.

    For Information Contact:
    Jep Larkin
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
    850.402.8450

    USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
    Unaudited

    We present a tangible common equity ratio and a tangible book value per diluted share that removes the effect of goodwill and other intangibles resulting from merger and acquisition activity. We believe these measures are useful to investors because they allow investors to more easily compare our capital adequacy to other companies in the industry. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered alternatives to GAAP-basis financial statements and other bank holding companies may define or calculate these non-GAAP measures or similar measures differently.

    The GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations are provided below.

    (Dollars in Thousands, except per share data) Jun 30, 2025 Mar 31, 2025 Dec 31, 2024 Sep 30, 2024 Jun 30, 2024
    Shareowners’ Equity (GAAP)   $ 526,423 $ 512,575 $ 495,317   476,499 $ 460,999
    Less: Goodwill and Other Intangibles (GAAP)     92,693   92,733   92,773   92,813   92,853
    Tangible Shareowners’ Equity (non-GAAP) A   433,730   419,842   402,544   383,686   368,146
    Total Assets (GAAP)     4,391,753   4,461,233   4,324,932   4,225,316   4,225,695
    Less: Goodwill and Other Intangibles (GAAP)     92,693   92,733   92,773   92,813   92,853
    Tangible Assets (non-GAAP) B $ 4,299,060 $ 4,368,500 $ 4,232,159   4,132,503 $ 4,132,842
    Tangible Common Equity Ratio (non-GAAP) A/B   10.09%   9.61%   9.51%   9.28%   8.91%
    Actual Diluted Shares Outstanding (GAAP) C   17,097,986   17,072,330   17,018,122   16,980,686   16,970,228
    Tangible Book Value per Diluted Share (non-GAAP) A/C $ 25.37 $ 24.59 $ 23.65   22.60 $ 21.69
     
    CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP, INC.                      
    EARNINGS HIGHLIGHTS                      
    Unaudited                      
                           
        Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)   Jun 30, 2025   Mar 31, 2025   Jun 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2025   Jun 30, 2024  
    EARNINGS                      
    Net Income Attributable to Common Shareowners $ 15,044 $ 16,858 $ 14,150 $ 31,902 $ 26,707  
    Diluted Net Income Per Share $ 0.88 $ 0.99 $ 0.83 $ 1.87 $ 1.57  
    PERFORMANCE                      
    Return on Average Assets (annualized)   1.38 % 1.58 % 1.33 % 1.48 % 1.27 %
    Return on Average Equity (annualized)   11.44   13.32   12.23   12.36   11.66  
    Net Interest Margin   4.30   4.22   4.02   4.26   4.01  
    Noninterest Income as % of Operating Revenue   31.67   32.39   33.30   32.03   32.69  
    Efficiency Ratio   67.26 % 62.93 % 68.61 % 65.13 % 69.81 %
    CAPITAL ADEQUACY                      
    Tier 1 Capital   18.38 % 18.01 % 16.31 % 18.38 % 16.31 %
    Total Capital   19.60   19.20   17.50   19.60   17.50  
    Leverage   11.14   11.17   10.51   11.14   10.51  
    Common Equity Tier 1   16.81   16.08   14.44   16.81   14.44  
    Tangible Common Equity(1)   10.09   9.61   8.91   10.09   8.91  
    Equity to Assets   11.99 % 11.49 % 10.91 % 11.99 % 10.91 %
    ASSET QUALITY                      
    Allowance as % of Non-Performing Loans   463.01 % 692.10 % 529.79 % 463.01 % 529.79 %
    Allowance as a % of Loans HFI   1.13   1.12   1.09   1.13   1.09  
    Net Charge-Offs as % of Average Loans HFI   0.09   0.09   0.18   0.09   0.20  
    Nonperforming Assets as % of Loans HFI and OREO   0.25   0.17   0.23   0.25   0.23  
    Nonperforming Assets as % of Total Assets   0.15 % 0.10 % 0.15 % 0.15 % 0.15 %
    STOCK PERFORMANCE                      
    High $ 39.82 $ 38.27 $ 28.58 $ 39.82 $ 31.34  
    Low   32.38   33.00   25.45   32.38   25.45  
    Close $ 39.35 $ 35.96 $ 28.44 $ 39.35 $ 28.44  
    Average Daily Trading Volume   27,397   24,486   29,861   25,988   30,433  
                           
    (1)Tangible common equity ratio is a non-GAAP financial measure. For additional information, including a reconciliation to GAAP, refer to Page 10.        
     
    CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP, INC.                    
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION            
    Unaudited                    
                         
      2025   2024
    (Dollars in thousands) Second Quarter   First Quarter   Fourth Quarter   Third Quarter   Second Quarter
    ASSETS                    
    Cash and Due From Banks $ 78,485   $ 78,521   $ 70,543   $ 83,431   $ 75,304  
    Funds Sold and Interest Bearing Deposits   394,917     446,042     321,311     261,779     272,675  
    Total Cash and Cash Equivalents   473,402     524,563     391,854     345,210     347,979  
                         
    Investment Securities Available for Sale   533,457     461,224     403,345     336,187     310,941  
    Investment Securities Held to Maturity   462,599     517,176     567,155     561,480     582,984  
    Other Equity Securities   3,242     2,315     2,399     6,976     2,537  
    Total Investment Securities   999,298     980,715     972,899     904,643     896,462  
                         
    Loans Held for Sale (“HFS”):   19,181     21,441     28,672     31,251     24,022  
                         
    Loans Held for Investment (“HFI”):                    
    Commercial, Financial, & Agricultural   180,008     184,393     189,208     194,625     204,990  
    Real Estate – Construction   174,115     192,282     219,994     218,899     200,754  
    Real Estate – Commercial   802,504     806,942     779,095     819,955     823,122  
    Real Estate – Residential   1,046,368     1,040,594     1,028,498     1,023,485     1,012,541  
    Real Estate – Home Equity   228,201     225,987     220,064     210,988     211,126  
    Consumer   197,483     206,191     199,479     213,305     234,212  
    Other Loans   1,552     3,227     14,006     461     2,286  
    Overdrafts   1,259     1,154     1,206     1,378     1,192  
    Total Loans Held for Investment   2,631,490     2,660,770     2,651,550     2,683,096     2,690,223  
    Allowance for Credit Losses   (29,862 )   (29,734 )   (29,251 )   (29,836 )   (29,219 )
    Loans Held for Investment, Net   2,601,628     2,631,036     2,622,299     2,653,260     2,661,004  
                         
    Premises and Equipment, Net   79,906     80,043     81,952     81,876     81,414  
    Goodwill and Other Intangibles   92,693     92,733     92,773     92,813     92,853  
    Other Real Estate Owned   132     132     367     650     650  
    Other Assets   125,513     130,570     134,116     115,613     121,311  
    Total Other Assets   298,244     303,478     309,208     290,952     296,228  
    Total Assets $ 4,391,753   $ 4,461,233   $ 4,324,932   $ 4,225,316   $ 4,225,695  
    LIABILITIES                    
    Deposits:                    
    Noninterest Bearing Deposits $ 1,332,080   $ 1,363,739   $ 1,306,254   $ 1,330,715   $ 1,343,606  
    NOW Accounts   1,284,137     1,292,654     1,285,281     1,174,585     1,177,180  
    Money Market Accounts   408,666     445,999     404,396     401,272     413,594  
    Savings Accounts   504,331     511,265     506,766     507,604     514,560  
    Certificates of Deposit   175,639     170,233     169,280     164,901     159,624  
    Total Deposits   3,704,853     3,783,890     3,671,977     3,579,077     3,608,564  
                         
    Repurchase Agreements   21,800     22,799     26,240     29,339     22,463  
    Other Short-Term Borrowings   12,741     14,401     2,064     7,929     3,307  
    Subordinated Notes Payable   42,582     52,887     52,887     52,887     52,887  
    Other Long-Term Borrowings   680     794     794     794     1,009  
    Other Liabilities   82,674     73,887     75,653     71,974     69,987  
    Total Liabilities   3,865,330     3,948,658     3,829,615     3,742,000     3,758,217  
                         
    Temporary Equity   –     –     –     6,817     6,479  
    SHAREOWNERS’ EQUITY                    
    Common Stock   171     171     170     169     169  
    Additional Paid-In Capital   39,527     38,576     37,684     36,070     35,547  
    Retained Earnings   487,665     476,715     463,949     454,342     445,959  
    Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax   (940 )   (2,887 )   (6,486 )   (14,082 )   (20,676 )
    Total Shareowners’ Equity   526,423     512,575     495,317     476,499     460,999  
    Total Liabilities, Temporary Equity and Shareowners’ Equity $ 4,391,753   $ 4,461,233   $ 4,324,932   $ 4,225,316   $ 4,225,695  
    OTHER BALANCE SHEET DATA                    
    Earning Assets $ 4,044,886   $ 4,108,969   $ 3,974,431   $ 3,880,769   $ 3,883,382  
    Interest Bearing Liabilities   2,450,576     2,511,032     2,447,708     2,339,311     2,344,624  
    Book Value Per Diluted Share $ 30.79   $ 30.02   $ 29.11   $ 28.06   $ 27.17  
    Tangible Book Value Per Diluted Share(1)   25.37     24.59     23.65     22.60     21.69  
    Actual Basic Shares Outstanding   17,066     17,055     16,975     16,944     16,942  
    Actual Diluted Shares Outstanding   17,098     17,072     17,018     16,981     16,970  
    (1)Tangible book value per diluted share is a non-GAAP financial measure. For additional information, including a reconciliation to GAAP, refer to Page 10.
     
    CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP, INC.                            
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS                      
    Unaudited                            
                                 
        2025   2024   Six Months Ended June 30,
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)   Second Quarter   First Quarter   Fourth Quarter   Third Quarter   Second Quarter   2025   2024
    INTEREST INCOME                            
    Loans, including Fees $ 40,872 $ 40,478 $ 41,453   $ 41,659 $ 41,138 $ 81,350 $ 81,821
    Investment Securities   6,678   5,808   4,694     4,155   4,004   12,486   8,248
    Federal Funds Sold and Interest Bearing Deposits   3,909   3,496   3,596     3,514   3,624   7,405   5,517
    Total Interest Income   51,459   49,782   49,743     49,328   48,766   101,241   95,586
    INTEREST EXPENSE                            
    Deposits   7,405   7,383   7,766     8,223   8,579   14,788   16,173
    Repurchase Agreements   156   164   199     221   217   320   418
    Other Short-Term Borrowings   179   117   83     52   68   296   107
    Subordinated Notes Payable   530   560   581     610   630   1,090   1,258
    Other Long-Term Borrowings   5   11   11     11   3   16   6
    Total Interest Expense   8,275   8,235   8,640     9,117   9,497   16,510   17,962
    Net Interest Income   43,184   41,547   41,103     40,211   39,269   84,731   77,624
    Provision for Credit Losses   620   768   701     1,206   1,204   1,388   2,124
    Net Interest Income after Provision for Credit Losses   42,564   40,779   40,402     39,005   38,065   83,343   75,500
    NONINTEREST INCOME                            
    Deposit Fees   5,320   5,061   5,207     5,512   5,377   10,381   10,627
    Bank Card Fees   3,774   3,514   3,697     3,624   3,766   7,288   7,386
    Wealth Management Fees   5,206   5,763   5,222     4,770   4,439   10,969   9,121
    Mortgage Banking Revenues   4,190   3,820   3,118     3,966   4,381   8,010   7,259
    Other   1,524   1,749   1,516     1,641   1,643   3,273   3,310
    Total Noninterest Income   20,014   19,907   18,760     19,513   19,606   39,921   37,703
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE                            
    Compensation   26,490   26,248   26,108     25,800   24,406   52,738   48,813
    Occupancy, Net   7,071   6,793   6,893     7,098   6,997   13,864   13,991
    Other   8,977   5,660   8,781     10,023   9,038   14,637   17,808
    Total Noninterest Expense   42,538   38,701   41,782     42,921   40,441   81,239   80,612
    OPERATING PROFIT   20,040   21,985   17,380     15,597   17,230   42,025   32,591
    Income Tax Expense   4,996   5,127   4,219     2,980   3,189   10,123   6,725
    Net Income   15,044   16,858   13,161     12,617   14,041   31,902   25,866
    Pre-Tax (Income) Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest   –   –   (71 )   501   109   –   841
    NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO
    COMMON SHAREOWNERS
    $ 15,044 $ 16,858 $ 13,090   $ 13,118 $ 14,150 $ 31,902 $ 26,707
    PER COMMON SHARE                            
    Basic Net Income $ 0.88 $ 0.99 $ 0.77   $ 0.77 $ 0.84 $ 1.87 $ 1.58
    Diluted Net Income   0.88   0.99   0.77     0.77   0.83   1.87   1.57
    Cash Dividend $ 0.24 $ 0.24 $ 0.23   $ 0.23 $ 0.21 $ 0.48 $ 0.42
    AVERAGE SHARES                            
    Basic   17,056   17,027   16,946     16,943   16,931   17,042   16,941
    Diluted   17,088   17,044   16,990     16,979   16,960   17,067   16,964
     
    CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP, INC.                            
    ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES (“ACL”)                        
    AND CREDIT QUALITY                            
    Unaudited                            
                                 
        2025     2024     Six Months Ended June 30,
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)   Second Quarter   First Quarter   Fourth Quarter   Third Quarter   Second Quarter   2025     2024  
    ACL – HELD FOR INVESTMENT LOANS                            
    Balance at Beginning of Period $ 29,734   $ 29,251   $ 29,836   $ 29,219   $ 29,329   $ 29,251   $ 29,941  
    Transfer from Other (Assets) Liabilities   –     –     –     –     –     –     (50 )
    Provision for Credit Losses   718     1,083     1,085     1,879     1,129     1,801     2,061  
    Net Charge-Offs (Recoveries)   590     600     1,670     1,262     1,239     1,190     2,733  
    Balance at End of Period $ 29,862   $ 29,734   $ 29,251   $ 29,836   $ 29,219   $ 29,862   $ 29,219  
    As a % of Loans HFI   1.13 %   1.12 %   1.10 %   1.11 %   1.09 %   1.13 %   1.09 %
    As a % of Nonperforming Loans   463.01 %   692.10 %   464.14 %   452.64 %   529.79 %   463.01 %   529.79 %
    ACL – UNFUNDED COMMITMENTS                            
    Balance at Beginning of Period   1,832   $ 2,155   $ 2,522   $ 3,139   $ 3,121   $ 2,155   $ 3,191  
    Provision for Credit Losses   (94 )   (323 )   (367 )   (617 )   18     (417 )   (52 )
    Balance at End of Period(1)   1,738     1,832     2,155     2,522     3,139     1,738     3,139  
    ACL – DEBT SECURITIES                            
    Provision for Credit Losses $ (4 ) $ 8   $ (17 ) $ (56 ) $ 57   $ 4   $ 115  
    CHARGE-OFFS                            
    Commercial, Financial and Agricultural $ 74   $ 168   $ 499   $ 331   $ 400   $ 242   $ 682  
    Real Estate – Construction   –     –     47     –     –     –     –  
    Real Estate – Commercial   –     –     –     3     –     –     –  
    Real Estate – Residential   49     8     44     –     –     57     17  
    Real Estate – Home Equity   24     –     33     23     –     24     76  
    Consumer   914     865     1,307     1,315     1,061     1,779     2,611  
    Overdrafts   437     570     574     611     571     1,007     1,209  
    Total Charge-Offs $ 1,498   $ 1,611   $ 2,504   $ 2,283   $ 2,032   $ 3,109   $ 4,595  
    RECOVERIES                            
    Commercial, Financial and Agricultural $ 117   $ 75   $ 103   $ 176   $ 59   $ 192   $ 100  
    Real Estate – Construction   –     –     3     –     –     –     –  
    Real Estate – Commercial   6     3     33     5     19     9     223  
    Real Estate – Residential   65     119     28     88     23     184     60  
    Real Estate – Home Equity   42     9     17     59     37     51     61  
    Consumer   456     481     352     405     313     937     723  
    Overdrafts   222     324     298     288     342     546     695  
    Total Recoveries $ 908   $ 1,011   $ 834   $ 1,021   $ 793   $ 1,919   $ 1,862  
    NET CHARGE-OFFS (RECOVERIES) $ 590   $ 600   $ 1,670   $ 1,262   $ 1,239   $ 1,190   $ 2,733  
    Net Charge-Offs as a % of Average Loans HFI(2)   0.09 %   0.09 %   0.25 %   0.19 %   0.18 %   0.09 %   0.20 %
    CREDIT QUALITY                            
    Nonaccruing Loans $ 6,449   $ 4,296   $ 6,302   $ 6,592   $ 5,515          
    Other Real Estate Owned   132     132     367     650     650          
    Total Nonperforming Assets (“NPAs”) $ 6,581   $ 4,428   $ 6,669   $ 7,242   $ 6,165          
                                 
    Past Due Loans 30-89 Days $ 4,523   $ 3,735   $ 4,311   $ 9,388   $ 5,672          
    Classified Loans   28,623     19,194     19,896     25,501     25,566          
                                 
    Nonperforming Loans as a % of Loans HFI   0.25 %   0.16 %   0.24 %   0.25 %   0.21 %        
    NPAs as a % of Loans HFI and Other Real Estate   0.25 %   0.17 %   0.25 %   0.27 %   0.23 %        
    NPAs as a % of Total Assets   0.15 %   0.10 %   0.15 %   0.17 %   0.15 %        
                                 
    (1)Recorded in other liabilities                            
    (2)Annualized                            
     
    CAPITAL CITY BANK GROUP, INC.                                                                                        
    AVERAGE BALANCE AND INTEREST RATES                                                                                        
    Unaudited                                                                                                    
                                                                                                         
        Second Quarter 2025     First Quarter 2025     Fourth Quarter 2024     Third Quarter 2024     Second Quarter 2024       June 2025 YTD     June 2024 YTD  
    (Dollars in thousands)   Average
    Balance
      Interest   Average
    Rate
        Average
    Balance
      Interest   Average
    Rate
        Average
    Balance
      Interest   Average
    Rate
        Average
    Balance
      Interest   Average
    Rate
        Average
    Balance
      Interest   Average
    Rate
          Average
    Balance
      Interest   Average
    Rate
        Average
    Balance
      Interest   Average
    Rate
     
    ASSETS:                                                                                                    
    Loans Held for Sale $ 22,668   $ 475   8.40 % $ 24,726   $ 490   8.04 % $ 31,047   $ 976   7.89 % $ 24,570     720   7.49 % $ 26,281   $ 517   5.26 %   $ 23,692   $ 965   8.21 % $ 26,797   $ 1,080   5.62 %
    Loans Held for Investment(1)   2,652,572     40,436   6.11     2,665,910     40,029   6.09     2,677,396     40,521   6.07     2,693,533     40,985   6.09     2,726,748     40,683   6.03       2,659,204     80,465   6.10     2,727,688     80,879   5.99  
                                                                                                         
    Investment Securities                                                                                                    
    Taxable Investment Securities   1,006,514     6,666   2.65     981,485     5,802   2.38     914,353     4,688   2.04     907,610     4,148   1.82     918,989     3,998   1.74       994,068     12,468   2.52     935,658     8,237   1.76  
    Tax-Exempt Investment Securities(1)   1,467     17   4.50     845     9   4.32     849     9   4.31     846     10   4.33     843     9   4.36       1,158     26   4.43     850     18   4.35  
                                                                                                         
    Total Investment Securities   1,007,981     6,683   2.65     982,330     5,811   2.38     915,202     4,697   2.04     908,456     4,158   1.82     919,832     4,007   1.74       995,226     12,494   2.52     936,508     8,255   1.76  
                                                                                                         
    Federal Funds Sold and Interest Bearing Deposits   348,787     3,909   4.49     320,948     3,496   4.42     298,255     3,596   4.80     256,855     3,514   5.44     262,419     3,624   5.56       334,944     7,405   4.46     201,454     5,517   5.51  
                                                                                                         
    Total Earning Assets   4,032,008   $ 51,503   5.12 %   3,993,914   $ 49,826   5.06 %   3,921,900   $ 49,790   5.05 %   3,883,414   $ 49,377   5.06 %   3,935,280   $ 48,831   4.99 %     4,013,066   $ 101,329   5.09 %   3,892,447   $ 95,731   4.94 %
                                                                                                         
    Cash and Due From Banks   65,761               73,467               73,992               70,994               74,803                 69,593               75,283            
    Allowance for Credit Losses   (30,492 )             (30,008 )             (30,107 )             (29,905 )             (29,564 )               (30,251 )             (29,797 )          
    Other Assets   302,984               297,660               293,884               291,359               291,669                 300,336               293,473            
                                                                                                         
    Total Assets $ 4,370,261             $ 4,335,033             $ 4,259,669             $ 4,215,862             $ 4,272,188               $ 4,352,744             $ 4,231,406            
                                                                                                         
    LIABILITIES:                                                                                                    
    Noninterest Bearing Deposits $ 1,342,304             $ 1,317,425             $ 1,323,556             $ 1,332,305             $ 1,346,546               $ 1,329,933             $ 1,345,367            
    NOW Accounts   1,225,697   $ 3,750   1.23 %   1,249,955   $ 3,854   1.25 %   1,182,073   $ 3,826   1.29 %   1,145,544   $ 4,087   1.42 %   1,207,643   $ 4,425   1.47 %     1,237,759   $ 7,604   1.24 %   1,204,337   $ 8,922   1.49 %
    Money Market Accounts   431,774     2,340   2.17     420,059     2,187   2.11     422,615     2,526   2.38     418,625     2,694   2.56     407,387     2,752   2.72       425,949     4,527   2.14     380,489     4,737   2.50  
    Savings Accounts   507,950     174   0.14     507,676     176   0.14     504,859     179   0.14     512,098     180   0.14     519,374     176   0.14       507,813     350   0.14     529,374     364   0.14  
    Time Deposits   172,982     1,141   2.65     170,367     1,166   2.78     167,321     1,235   2.94     163,462     1,262   3.07     160,078     1,226   3.08       171,682     2,307   2.71     149,203     2,150   2.90  
    Total Interest Bearing Deposits   2,338,403     7,405   1.27     2,348,057     7,383   1.28     2,276,868     7,766   1.36     2,239,729     8,223   1.46     2,294,482     8,579   1.50       2,343,203     14,788   1.27     2,263,403     16,173   1.44  
    Total Deposits   3,680,707     7,405   0.81     3,665,482     7,383   0.82     3,600,424     7,766   0.86     3,572,034     8,223   0.92     3,641,028     8,579   0.95       3,673,136     14,788   0.81     3,608,770     16,173   0.90  
    Repurchase Agreements   22,557     156   2.78     29,821     164   2.23     28,018     199   2.82     27,126     221   3.24     26,999     217   3.24       26,169     320   2.47     26,362     418   3.19  
    Other Short-Term Borrowings   10,503     179   6.82     7,437     117   6.39     6,510     83   5.06     2,673     52   7.63     6,592     68   4.16       8,978     296   6.64     5,176     107   4.16  
    Subordinated Notes Payable   51,981     530   4.03     52,887     560   4.23     52,887     581   4.30     52,887     610   4.52     52,887     630   4.71       52,432     1,090   4.13     52,887     1,258   4.70  
    Other Long-Term Borrowings   792     5   2.41     794     11   5.68     794     11   5.57     795     11   5.55     258     3   4.31       793     16   4.04     270     6   4.56  
    Total Interest Bearing Liabilities   2,424,236   $ 8,275   1.37 %   2,438,996   $ 8,235   1.37 %   2,365,077   $ 8,640   1.45 %   2,323,210   $ 9,117   1.56 %   2,381,218   $ 9,497   1.60 %     2,431,575   $ 16,510   1.37 %   2,348,098   $ 17,962   1.54 %
                                                                                                         
    Other Liabilities   76,138               65,211               73,130               73,767               72,634                 70,705               70,464            
                                                                                                         
    Total Liabilities   3,842,678               3,821,632               3,761,763               3,729,282               3,800,398                 3,832,213               3,763,929            
    Temporary Equity   –               –               6,763               6,443               6,493                 –               6,821            
                                                                                                         
    SHAREOWNERS’ EQUITY:   527,583               513,401               491,143               480,137               465,297                 520,531               460,656            
                                                                                                         
    Total Liabilities, Temporary Equity and Shareowners’ Equity $ 4,370,261             $ 4,335,033             $ 4,259,669             $ 4,215,862             $ 4,272,188               $ 4,352,744             $ 4,231,406            
                                                                                                         
    Interest Rate Spread     $ 43,228   3.75 %     $ 41,591   3.69 %     $ 41,150   3.59 %     $ 40,260   3.49 %     $ 39,334   3.38 %       $ 84,819   3.72 %     $ 77,769   3.40 %
                                                                                                         
    Interest Income and Rate Earned(1)       51,503   5.12         49,826   5.06         49,790   5.05         49,377   5.06         48,831   4.99           101,329   5.09         95,731   4.94  
    Interest Expense and Rate Paid(2)       8,275   0.82         8,235   0.84         8,640   0.88         9,117   0.93         9,497   0.97           16,510   0.83         17,962   0.93  
                                                                                                         
    Net Interest Margin     $ 43,228   4.30 %     $ 41,591   4.22 %     $ 41,150   4.17 %     $ 40,260   4.12 %     $ 39,334   4.02 %       $ 84,819   4.26 %     $ 77,769   4.01 %
                                                                                                         
    (1)Interest and average rates are calculated on a tax-equivalent basis using a 21% Federal tax rate.                                                                  
    (2)Rate calculated based on average earning assets.                                                                       

    The MIL Network –

    July 22, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 53 54 55 56 57 … 1,471
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress