Category: housing

  • MIL-OSI USA: Unlocking homeownership: A bipartisan approach to building affordable housing

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman John Larson (1st District of Connecticut)

    Rep. Larson co-authored the following op-ed with Rep. Mike Kelly (PA-16) that appeared in The Hill:

    Erie, Pa. and Hartford, Conn. share much in common — snowy winters, growing technology sectors and, like many other communities across the nation, a pressing need for more affordable homeownership opportunities. 

    In cities like Erie and Hartford — which we proudly represent in Congress — as well as dozens of other older industrial cities, we’re witnessing block after block of aging homes deteriorating within a stone’s throw of burgeoning commercial districts. In east Erie, nearly 20 percent of properties are classified as being in poor or unsound condition, with another 37 percent showing the beginnings of disinvestment or neglect.

    The intertwined issues of blight, vacancy and an aging housing stock are not unique to older northeastern cities. They represent a truly national crisis, affecting cities from St. Louis and Detroit to Fresno and Jacksonville, from Baltimore to Birmingham and Charlotte. These challenges hit particularly hard in rural communities that have been suffering with outmigration and years of disinvestment.  

    Simultaneously, the U.S. is vastly underproducing housing. By some estimates, there is a shortage of 4 million homes. With construction costs on the rise and mortgage rates still high, it is exceedingly difficult to build homes that are affordable for lower- and middle-income families.

    The cost of inaction is severe for American families and local economies everywhere. Many families find it challenging to secure a home they can afford to buy, making it harder to build wealth. Moreover, existing homeowners often face extensive repair needs. In order to reverse the United States’ declining homeownership rate, we must build new homes that Americans can afford to own and make repairs to existing housing across the country.

    That’s why we proudly lead the Neighborhood Homes Investment Act in Congress. This bipartisan legislation would create a new tax credit to bridge the gap between the cost of building or repairing a home and the home’s value once it is built. By addressing this “value gap,” developers would be incentivized to build and renovate tens of thousands of homes annually in struggling urban and rural communities, helping to revitalize these areas while making homeownership accessible for many first-time homebuyers. 

    Our Neighborhood Homes proposal also utilizes a successful public-private partnership model to target communities in the greatest need, especially rural areas and those with high poverty rates. By partnering with the private sector, our bill could result in 500,000 new or rehabilitated homes over the next decade, while also creating good-paying jobs in construction and related industries.

    As Congress prepares tax legislation for 2025, we have a rare opportunity for bipartisan action to address our affordable housing crisis and narrow our country’s staggering homeownership gap. The need to keep our neighborhoods safe, vibrant and economically robust transcends party lines. More than 100 members of Congress from both parties supported the Neighborhood Homes Investment Act last Congress, and the bill has been endorsed by a broad coalition of industry and housing trade groups, state housing finance agencies, neighborhood redevelopment organizations, and both nonprofit and for-profit housing developers.

    We have just reintroduced the bill and now it’s time to take it across the finish line. Americans deserve more affordable homeownership opportunities, and many neighborhoods require investments to thrive. We must pass the Neighborhood Homes Investment Act. 

    U.S. Reps. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) and John Larson (D-Conn.) are the co-leads of the bipartisan Neighborhood Homes Improvement Act. Kelly serves as chairman of the Ways and Means Subcommittee on Tax, and Larson serves as ranking member of the Ways and Means Subcommittee on Social Security.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: ​Japanese anime classic ‘Ghost in the Shell’ to debut in China

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    The 1995 Japanese sci-fi anime “Ghost in the Shell,” considered a landmark in the genre, will make its Chinese debut in a restored 4K version nearly 30 years after its initial release.

    A Chinese poster for “Ghost in the Shell.” [Photo courtesy of China Film Group] 

    Director Mamoru Oshii expressed excitement about the film’s China release through a video statement.

    “I’m very happy to hear that ‘Ghost in the Shell’ is coming to China,” he said. “It has been decades since I directed the film, yet it still draws audiences to theaters. This is the greatest honor for a director.”

    Oshii said he still vividly remembers working on the project, which required tremendous dedication to complete.

    “One of cinema’s true joys, I believe, is creating shared experiences that bring people together in theaters rather than watching alone at home,” he said. “Whether you’re a first-time viewer or someone who has seen it through other platforms before, I hope everyone will take this opportunity to fully savor its 4K version with fresh eyes.”

    “Ghost in the Shell” is an adult animated film that blends tech-noir, cyberpunk and action-thriller elements. The movie, adapted from Masamune Shirow’s 1989-90 manga, is set in 2029 in the fictional New Port City, a metropolis inspired by Hong Kong, complete with prominent Chinese-language billboards.

    The story follows Major Motoko Kusanagi, a cyborg security agent pursuing a hacker called “the Puppet Master,” while exploring themes of identity and consciousness in an advanced technological society.

    The 1995 film’s cyber-aesthetic design remains visually striking today, while its exploration of identity and human-technology relationships has gained new relevance amid the rise of AI.

    A still from “Ghost in the Shell” shows Chinese billboards and signs throughout the streets of the fictional New Port City. [Photo courtesy of China Film Group] 

    The film initially underperformed at the box office but gained critical acclaim for its narrative, visuals and soundtrack, eventually achieving cult status through home video releases. It is now widely regarded as one of the greatest anime and science fiction films ever made, influencing filmmakers such as James Cameron (“Avatar”) and the Wachowskis (“The Matrix”).

    A remastered version with new digital effects, 3D animation and updated audio was released in 2008 as “Ghost in the Shell 2.0.” Oshii directed a standalone follow-up, “Ghost in the Shell 2: Innocence,” in 2004, while Hollywood released a live-action adaptation directed by Rupert Sanders and starring Scarlett Johansson in 2017.

    The film will make its Chinese debut on May 10 through the National Alliance of Arthouse Cinemas (NAAC), an organization founded in 2016 that operates under the China Film Archive with support from a theater consortium dedicated to arthouse films.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Newsom proclaims Older Californians Month

    Source: US State of California 2

    May 9, 2025

    Sacramento, California – Governor Gavin Newsom today issued a proclamation declaring May 2025 as “Older Californians Month.”

    The text of the proclamation and a copy can be found below:

    PROCLAMATION

    California is home to nearly nine million older residents who immeasurably enrich our families, communities, and economy through their diverse life experiences, cultures, and contributions. By 2030, one in four Californians will be 60 or older, and over one million will be 85 or older. Californians enjoy the fourth highest life expectancy in the United States, contributing to more people who reach the century mark than ever before with an estimated 28,388 people who will be age 100 or older in 2030.

    California is out in front of these national demographic shifts, continuing to deliver results in year five of the state’s 10-year Master Plan for Aging. Over the past year, we have elevated inclusive policies and programs that reflect many shared priorities of Californians. These include home and community care essential to our economy and our families; climate and disaster readiness efforts; behavioral health system modernization, including more geriatric care; expanding health care access and affordability, with more dementia prevention, screening, and care; and more affordable and accessible housing, transportation, and broadband in communities statewide.

    All Californians can be proud of the progress we’re making to build a state that fully includes and supports older adults, people with disabilities, and their caregivers. These efforts and our work to confront ageism and ableism are a key component of my Administration’s commitment to building an inclusive California for all.

    The theme of Older Californians Month this year – Flip the Script on Aging – focuses on transforming how society perceives, talks about, and approaches aging. Stigma and stereotypes are harmful to the self-image of older people and feed inequities and discrimination in systems of care and in communities more broadly. The Master Plan for Aging ensures all Californians have access to opportunities and services to live how and where they choose, providing person-centered services to those who need it most.

    The positive impact of our diverse and growing aging population is seen every day, from the record numbers of older adults in the workforce to the countless retirees and neighbors who volunteer their time to build up communities across the state. This month and throughout the year, let us all celebrate the older Californians who have contributed decades of knowledge, skills, and wisdom to our state and continue working towards a better future for Californians of every generation.

    NOW THEREFORE I, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of the State of California, do hereby proclaim May 2025 as “Older Californians Month.”

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the State of California to be affixed this 9th day of May 2025.

    GAVIN NEWSOM
    Governor of California

    ATTEST:
    SHIRLEY N. WEBER, Ph.D.
    Secretary of State

    Recent news

    News What you need to know: Ahead of peak wildfire season, California has launched “Ask CAL FIRE,” an AI-powered chatbot on CAL FIRE’s website offering wildfire resources and emergency information in 70 languages. SACRAMENTO — As California marks Wildfire Preparedness…

    News What you need to know: Governor Newsom has been appointed co-chair of the U.S. Climate Alliance – a bipartisan coalition of 24 governors working to achieve a net-zero carbon pollution future in America by advancing state-led, high-impact climate action….

    News SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the following appointments:Gena Castro Rodriguez, of Daly City, has been appointed to the Board of State and Community Corrections. Castro Rodriguez has been Owner of Castro Rodriguez Consulting since 2025 and an…

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: California launches new AI-powered chatbot that provides wildfire resources in 70 languages

    Source: US State of California 2

    May 9, 2025

    What you need to know: Ahead of peak wildfire season, California has launched “Ask CAL FIRE,” an AI-powered chatbot on CAL FIRE’s website offering wildfire resources and emergency information in 70 languages.

    SACRAMENTO — As California marks Wildfire Preparedness Week, Governor Gavin Newsom today announced CAL FIRE has launched a new artificial intelligence-powered chatbot on its website, fire.ca.gov. The tool is designed to help Californians more easily access critical fire prevention resources and near-real-time emergency information—offering support in 70 languages.

    The chatbot, “Ask CAL FIRE,” provides quick, reliable answers to commonly asked questions using information already available on CAL FIRE’s website and helps guide users to the appropriate pages for more detailed information. It also serves as a two-way tool – providing real-time insights to CAL FIRE on what information Californians are looking for.

    “California is harnessing technology and innovation to help people when it matters most. Ahead of peak wildfire season, we’re launching a new chatbot that will connect Californians with real-time information and resources in the language they speak. This is yet another way we’re transforming government to better serve people.”

    Governor Gavin Newsom

    Whether looking for home hardening strategies, defensible space guidance, or the latest on wildfire incidents over 10 acres across the state, users now have a simpler, more accessible way to get the answers they need—any time, day or night. 

    “In an era of fast-moving wildfires, fast-moving information is essential,” said CAL FIRE Director and Fire Chief Joe Tyler. “Tools like this help ensure Californians from all walks of life get the guidance they need to stay safe and informed.”

    The initiative underscores CAL FIRE’s commitment to modernizing public communication tools and expanding equitable access to vital information about wildfire preparedness, emergency incidents, and career opportunities in fire service. 

    CAL FIRE is a global leader in utilizing innovation and technology to fight fires smarter, leveraging artificial intelligence (AI), satellites, and more for wildfire detection, projection, response and suppression. CAL FIRE, in partnership with UC San Diego, was previously recognized by TIME magazine for its Best Invention of 2023, for using Artificial Intelligence to monitor over 1,000 cameras throughout the state and detect wildfires, allowing CAL FIRE to respond faster.

    At the same time, California has built up the largest aerial firefighting fleet in the world, including the recently added – and night-time capable – firefighting Fire Hawk helicopters to quickly and effectively contain wildfires.. 

    In addition to nearly doubling the state’s budget for CAL FIRE in recent years, the state has also dramatically increased work to prevent wildfire. While 57% of California’s forests are federally managed, the state government manages only 3% of the forestland. On state land, more than 2,200 projects are complete or underway, and in recent years, California has treated nearly 2 million acres – made possible by scaling up investments to 10 times the amount from when the Governor took office in 2019.

    Visit fire.ca.gov to try the chatbot and explore wildfire preparedness resources for your home, family, and community.

    Press releases, Recent news

    Recent news

    News What you need to know: Governor Newsom has been appointed co-chair of the U.S. Climate Alliance – a bipartisan coalition of 24 governors working to achieve a net-zero carbon pollution future in America by advancing state-led, high-impact climate action….

    News SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the following appointments:Gena Castro Rodriguez, of Daly City, has been appointed to the Board of State and Community Corrections. Castro Rodriguez has been Owner of Castro Rodriguez Consulting since 2025 and an…

    News Sacramento, California – Governor Gavin Newsom and First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom issued the following statement on the election of Pope Leo XIV, the first American Pope: Habemus papam. Jennifer and I join countless others around the globe to congratulate…

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Media Advisory – Hawaiʻi Community Correctional Center To Host First Resource Fair For Incarcerated Men and Women

    Source: US State of Hawaii

    Media Advisory – Hawaiʻi Community Correctional Center To Host First Resource Fair For Incarcerated Men and Women

    Posted on May 8, 2025 in Latest Department News, Newsroom

     

    STATE OF HAWAIʻI

    KA MOKU ʻĀINA O HAWAIʻI

     

    JOSH GREEN, M.D.

    GOVERNOR

    KE KIAʻĀINA

     

    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION

    KA ‘OIHANA HOʻOMALU KALAIMA A HOʻOPONOPONO OLA

     

    TOMMY JOHNSON

    DIRECTOR

    KA LUNA HO‘OKELE

     

     

    HAWAIʻI COMMUNITY CORRECTIONAL CENTER TO HOST FIRST RESOURCE FAIR FOR INCARCERATED MEN AND WOMEN

     

    MEDIA ADVISORY

     

    What: The Hawai’i Community Correctional Center is hosting its first reintegration resource fair for men and women housed at the Hale Nani Facility on Hawaiʻi island.

    Several organizations will be available to provide information offering support services to inmates to help them transition back into the community.

    Participating vendors include Goodwill Hawaiʻi, Kumukahi Health and Wellness, Going Home Hawaiʻi, Big Island Substance Abuse Council, Hawaiʻi County Vehicle Registration & Licensing, American Job Center Hawaiʻi, Hawaiʻi Community College of Hilo and Hope Services Hawaiʻi.

    When: 8 a.m. to 3 p.m. Thursday, May 15, 2025

    Where: Hale Nani Correctional Facility, 3900 Kanoelehua Ave., Hilo

    Who:

    • Director Tommy Johnson of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
    • DCR Deputy Director Sanna Muñoz of the Rehabilitation Services and Programs Division
    • Hawaiʻi Community Correctional Center Warden Cramer Mahoe
    • Hawaiʻi County Mayor Kimo Alameda
    • Men and women housed at Hale Nani Correctional Facility

     

    If your news organization plans to attend the event, please RSVP with the full names, dates of birth and Social Security numbers of the reporter and photographer to [email protected] by noon Monday, May 12, 2025.

    RSVPs and background information are required and must be submitted by noon May 12, 2025, to conduct background checks and security clearances.

    Those who do not RSVP and submit the required information will not be granted access to HCCC.

    Thank you.

     

     

    # # #

     

     

     

     

    Media Contact:

    Rosemarie Bernardo

    Public Information Officer

    Hawai‘i Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

    Office: 808-587-1358

    Cell: 808-683-5507

    Email: [email protected]

    Website: https://dcr.hawaii.gov

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for May 10, 2025

    ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on May 10, 2025.

    Tracing radiation through the Marshall Islands: Reflections from a veteran Greenpeace nuclear campaigner
    SPECIAL REPORT: By Shaun Burnie of Greenpeace We’ve visited Ground Zero. Not once, but three times. But for generations, before these locations were designated as such, they were the ancestral home to the people of the Marshall Islands. As part of a team of Greenpeace scientists and specialists from the Radiation Protection Advisers team, we

    USP World Press Freedom Day warnings over AI, legal reform and media safety
    World Press Freedom Day is not just a celebration of the vital role journalism plays — it is also a moment to reflect on the pressures facing the profession and Pacific governments’ responsibility to protect it. This was one of the key messages delivered by two guest speakers at The University of the South Pacific

    Labor likely to gain 5 senators, cementing the left’s Senate dominance
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne I previously wrote about the Senate the morning after the election. About half the Senate is elected at each House of Representatives election. Those up for election

    The artist as creator of all things: Julie Fragar wins the Archibald for a portrait among the stars
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Joanna Mendelssohn, Honorary Senior Fellow, School of Culture and Communication. Editor in Chief, Design and Art of Australia Online, The University of Melbourne Winner Archibald Prize 2025, Julie Fragar ‘Flagship Mother Multiverse (Justene)’, oil on canvas, 240 x 180.4 cm © the artist, image © Art Gallery

    The Kiwi heart surgeon, his wife and the film maker in Palestine
    Auckland film maker Paula Whetu Jones has spent nearly two decades working pro bono on a feature film about the Auckland cardiac surgeon Alan Kerr, which is finally now in cinemas. She is best known for co-writing and directing Whina, the feature film about Dame Whina Cooper. She filmed Dr Kerr and his wife Hazel

    Glyn Davis to quit as the prime minister’s top public servant
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Glyn Davis, Anthony Albanese’s hand-picked Secretary of the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, will leave the post on June 16. Albanese paid tribute to Davis for rebuilding the public service. “One of the key priorities of our government’s

    Pope Leo XIV faces limits on changing the Catholic Church − but Francis made reforms that set the stage for larger changes
    ANALYSIS: By Dennis Doyle, University of Dayton Cardinal Robert Prevost of the United States has been picked to be the new leader of the Roman Catholic Church; he will be known as Pope Leo XIV. Now, as greetings resound across the Pacific and globally, attention turns to what vision the first US pope will bring.

    Keith Rankin Analysis – Make Deficits Great Again: Maintaining a Pragmatic Balance
    Analysis by Keith Rankin. Donald Trump is a mercantilist, as noted in Trump’s tariffs: Short-term damage or long-term ruin? ‘The Bottom Line’, Al Jazeera, 11 April 2025 (or here on YouTube). But the United States, in today’s world, is not a mercantilist country. Or at least not a successful mercantilist country, though it is inhabited

    It’s almost winter. Why is Australia still so hot?
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew King, Associate Professor in Climate Science, ARC Centre of Excellence for 21st Century Weather, The University of Melbourne This year, for many Australians, it feels like summer never left. The sunny days and warm nights have continued well into autumn. Even now, in May, it’s still

    Labor has promised to tackle homelessness. Here’s what homeless people say they need
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robyn Martin, Associate Dean, Social Work and Human Services, RMIT University Pressmaster/Shutterstock The 2025 election is over and now it’s time for Labor to deliver on campaign promises to address homelessness. Action on homelessness is long overdue. Affordable housing options remain scarce and public and community housing

    View from The Hill: two ministers and the Nationals discover the limits of loyalty in politics
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra Labor’s extraordinary election result has triggered a power play that has exposed the uglier entrails of Labor factionalism. Even before the new caucus met in Canberra on Friday, the Labor right had dumped two of its cabinet ministers: Attorney-General Mark

    What’s the difference between probiotics and prebiotics? A dietitian explains
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Evangeline Mantzioris, Program Director of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Accredited Practising Dietitian, University of South Australia Simply Amazing/Shutterstock If you walk through your local pharmacy or supermarket you’re bound to come across probiotics and prebiotics. They’re added to certain foods. They come as supplements you can drink

    What will the Antichrist look like? According to Western thought, an authoritarian king – or the pope
    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Philip C. Almond, Emeritus Professor in the History of Religious Thought, The University of Queensland Composite image by The Conversation. Images courtesy of TruthSocial/@realDonaldTrump and Wikimedia Commons The US presidency and the papacy came together on May 3 when Donald Trump posted an AI-generated photograph of himself

    ER Report: A Roundup of Significant Articles on EveningReport.nz for May 9, 2025
    ER Report: Here is a summary of significant articles published on EveningReport.nz on May 9, 2025.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EU Fact Sheets – Common transport policy: Overview – 08-05-2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Transport policy has been one of the EU’s common policies for more than 30 years. Alongside the opening up of transport markets and the creation of the Trans-European Transport Network, the ‘sustainable mobility’ model will take on even greater importance – particularly in view of the constant rise in greenhouse gas emissions from the transport sector, which threatens to jeopardise the European Union’s efforts to achieve its climate goals.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Isabel Schnabel: Keeping a steady hand in an unsteady world

    Source: European Central Bank

    Speech by Isabel Schnabel, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, at Hoover Monetary Policy Conference “Finishing the Job and New Challenges”, Stanford University

    Stanford, 10 May 2025

    Standard theory of monetary policy rests on a simple premise: a stable relationship between inflation and the output gap. This is the logic behind the Phillips curve, which, in its most common form, relates inflation to a measure of economic slack, expected inflation and supply shocks.[1]

    The relationship between output and inflation was already under scrutiny well before the pandemic.

    After the global financial crisis of 2008, inflation didn’t fall nearly as much as had been implied by conventional Phillips curve estimates. And once economies around the world recovered and unemployment fell, the bounce-back in inflation fell short of model predictions.

    This is why that episode is known as the period of “missing deflation” and “missing inflation”.[2]

    The situation changed fundamentally in the aftermath of the pandemic, when the relationship between inflation and the output gap proved to be much stronger than what would have been expected based on historical estimates. We observed a noticeably steeper Phillips curve across advanced economies, including the euro area (Slide 2).[3]

    In my remarks today, I would like to draw lessons from the instability of the Phillips curve over the past 20 years for the optimal conduct of monetary policy. I will argue that the evidence of a re-flattening of the Phillips curve after the long period of high inflation suggests that, in the euro area, the most appropriate policy response to the potential risks to price stability arising from fiscal expansion and protectionism is to keep a steady hand and maintain rates close to where they are today – that is, firmly in neutral territory.

    Monetary policy and the slope of the Phillips curve

    The slope of the Phillips curve has first-order implications for the conduct of monetary policy.

    If the curve is steep, as it appeared to be in recent years, monetary policy is highly effective in reducing inflation, with only a limited impact on growth and employment. The smaller “sacrifice ratio” suggests that central banks should react more forcefully to deviations of inflation from target, even when the economy is hit by a supply shock that pushes inflation up and output down.[4]

    A steep Phillips curve hence improves the trade-off facing central banks, weakening the case for “looking through”, as forceful policy action minimises the risks of inflation expectations unanchoring and of inflation becoming entrenched.[5]

    Policy prescriptions differ fundamentally if the Phillips curve is flat.

    In this case, a large policy impulse is required to move output sufficiently to generate aggregate price effects. It can then be optimal for policy to tolerate moderate deviations of inflation from target, as the cost of closing a small inflation gap relative to the target may exceed the benefits.

    This prescription holds in both directions.

    When inflation is above the target, a flat Phillips curve would require a sharp rise in policy rates to bring medium-term inflation down from, say, 2.3% to 2%. Such a course of action may imply a substantial rise in unemployment and may thus not be welfare-improving for society at large – a trade-off central banks may face during the last mile of disinflation.[6]

    The experience of the 2010s, when inflation was persistently below the target, demonstrates that the argument also holds in the opposite direction.

    If bringing inflation up from 1.7% to 2%, for example, requires purchasing a large fraction of outstanding government bonds and making potentially time-inconsistent promises about the future path of interest rates, then the central bank must consider carefully whether the benefits outweigh the costs, such as making losses in the future, market dysfunction, rising wealth inequality, financial instability and threats to its reputation.[7]

    The role of inflation expectations

    However, the ability to tolerate moderate deviations of inflation from target critically hinges on a firm anchoring of inflation expectations – that is, a low sensitivity of inflation expectations to realised inflation.

    If inflation expectations are well-anchored, policymakers can tolerate moderate deviations from target, as fluctuations in inflation tend to fade away. If, however, inflation expectations are at risk of unanchoring, central banks should act forcefully.[8]

    There are two challenges to this strategy.

    One is that the anchoring of inflation expectations is endogenous. Central banks themselves can cause an unanchoring if inaction in the face of price shocks is perceived as weakening its commitment to securing price stability.[9]

    History shows that it can be costly to reestablish the credibility of the nominal anchor once it has been lost. This is also because inflation expectations are path-dependent. Research shows that the experience of high inflation may raise the sensitivity of inflation expectations to new inflation surprises.[10]

    The other challenge is that different measures of inflation expectations often yield different results (Slide 3). As such, robust trends cannot easily be identified in real time, much like the slope of the Phillips curve.[11]

    Measures of inflation expectations can even point in opposite directions. Research from the early days of the pandemic showed that most consumers expected the pandemic to raise prices, contrary to the views held by professional forecasters at the time.[12]

    State-dependent pricing and tight labour markets can explain steeper Phillips curve and post-pandemic inflation surge

    The recent period of high inflation illustrates how sensitive policy conclusions can be to the assessment of the slope of the Phillips curve and to measures of inflation expectations that central banks use in their analysis.

    Two key theories have been proposed to explain the post-pandemic inflation surge.[13]

    The first relates to firms’ price-setting behaviour.

    Standard New Keynesian models assume that the probability of firms resetting their prices is constant over time. This is a fair description of aggregate price movements when inflation is low and aggregate shocks are small (Slide 4).

    However, the past few years have demonstrated that this “linear” relationship breaks down in the face of large shocks.[14] When marginal costs increase rapidly and threaten to erode profit margins, firms tend to raise their prices more frequently. As a result, the Phillips curve steepens.

    This feedback loop is strongly asymmetric.[15] It acts as an inflation accelerator when firms face positive demand or adverse cost-push shocks.[16] But it does little to firms’ pricing strategies in the face of disinflationary shocks due to downward price rigidities.

    This helps explain why inflation did not fall much when the pandemic broke out but increased sharply after the reopening of our economies (Slide 5).[17]

    The second theory relates to the tightness of the labour market.

    Downward nominal wage rigidity has been a key factor explaining the “missing deflation” in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.[18] If nominal wages do not fall, or fall only very slowly, firms’ marginal costs change only moderately, and hence disinflationary pressures face a natural lower bound, even if slack is large.

    But when the labour market is tight, wages are more flexible as firms outbid each other in securing their desired workforce.

    Benigno and Eggertsson show that this channel led to a non-linear inflation surge in the United States whenever the number of job vacancies exceeded the number of unemployed workers (Slide 6).[19] In the euro area, the threshold was lower, but the curve still exhibited strong signs of non-linearity.

    Rising near-term inflation expectations may have shifted the Phillips curve up

    New research for the United States, however, suggests that the evidence in favour of the second theory is not very robust.

    Specifically, the finding of non-linearity depends critically on which measure is used to control for inflation expectations: non-linearity holds when controlling for expectations of professional forecasters, but it disappears once inflation expectations of households and firms are considered.[20]

    In other words, it is conceivable that the Phillips curve did not become steeper but rather shifted upwards as inflation expectations rose.[21] Non-linearity has also been rejected recently using a similar approach based on regional data for the euro area.[22]

    Moreover, the expectations that are relevant for such an upward shift are not necessarily the longer-term expectations that central banks typically pay most attention to.

    These have remained remarkably stable over the past few years (Slide 7).

    Rather, inflation expectations over the near term, such as the next 12 months, may be more important in driving macroeconomic outcomes.

    Bernanke and Blanchard, for example, show that one-year-ahead inflation expectations explain a significant share of the recent marked rise in nominal wages, and hence inflation, in the United States.[23] Similar evidence has been found for the euro area and other advanced economies.[24]

    Again, there appears to be an asymmetry: the risks that the Phillips curve shifts downwards are substantially lower. Research shows that consumers tend to respond more to inflationary than disinflationary news, as households value increases in their purchasing power and as they pay less attention to inflation when it is low.[25]

    The impact of tariffs on inflation in the euro area

    Understanding the reasons behind the recent inflation surge is not only important from a conceptual perspective. It also matters for setting monetary policy today, as we are once again confronted with historically large shocks.

    For central banks, this is a difficult environment to navigate.

    Memories of high inflation are still fresh after a long period of sharply rising prices. And just as during the pandemic, there is considerable uncertainty about how firms and households are going to respond to shocks that are largely outside the historical empirical range.

    Ultimately, the impact of current shocks on prices and wages, and hence the appropriate monetary policy response, will depend on the shape and location of the Phillips curve.

    Monetary policy should focus on the medium term and underlying inflation

    Let me illustrate this by looking at the euro area.

    Given the lags in policy transmission, the relevant horizon for monetary policy is the medium term. The past few years, however, demonstrated that inflation forecasting at times of large structural shocks is inherently difficult and plagued by large uncertainty.

    For this reason, the ECB and other central banks have increasingly turned to a data-dependent approach to monetary policy, where the observed dynamics of underlying inflation and the strength of monetary transmission are used to cross-check the inflation projections.[26]

    This approach remains valid today.[27] But data dependence is not in contrast to being forward-looking.

    In the current situation, the high level of economic uncertainty, together with the sharp fall in energy prices and a stronger euro exchange rate, will likely dampen headline inflation in the short run, potentially pushing it below our 2% target.

    The question is whether these developments provide meaningful signals about the net impact of current shocks on medium-term inflation.

    During the pandemic, for example, a strong appreciation of the euro against the US dollar, by nearly 14% over seven months, and a marked decline in energy prices were followed by a historical inflation surge.

    Data dependency hence requires examining the potential channels through which current shocks could affect underlying inflation over the medium term.

    In the euro area, there are two main forces that could have the size and persistence to pull underlying inflation sustainably away from our 2% medium-term target.

    One is fiscal policy, which is set to expand on a scale unseen outside periods of deep economic contraction.

    Germany has eased its constitutional debt brake for defence-related spending, and has committed to spending €500 billion, or more than 10% of GDP, on infrastructure and the green transition over the next 12 years. In addition, the European Commission has invited Member States to activate the national escape clause to accommodate increased defence expenditure across the EU.

    The impact of these measures on inflation will depend on how they are implemented, especially their impact on the supply side of the economy. But on balance, the fiscal impulse is likely to put upward pressure on underlying inflation over the medium term.

    Global fragmentation is the second force that could have a lasting impact on prices and wages.

    As we speak, the scale and scope of tariffs, the extent of retaliation as well as how financial markets respond to these developments all remain highly uncertain.

    Ongoing negotiations are a sign that mutually beneficial agreements may still be reached. An ideal outcome – the “zero-for-zero” tariff agreement advocated by the European Commission – could even boost growth and employment on both sides of the Atlantic.

    However, should these negotiations fail, the euro area will simultaneously face adverse supply and demand shocks, as the EU has announced that it will retaliate against higher tariffs.

    Similar to the pandemic, assessing the relative strength of these forces is inherently difficult. Overall, however, there are risks that a lasting and meaningful increase in tariffs will reinforce the upward pressure on underlying inflation arising from higher fiscal spending over the medium term.

    To see this, it is useful to look at the factors driving the macroeconomic propagation of tariffs.

    Euro area foreign demand may prove resilient, with limited effects on inflation

    The severity of the negative demand shock will depend on two factors.

    One is the hit to economic activity in the United States and to global demand from raising tariffs across the board. Under the 2 April tariff rates, the United States will face a supply shock of historic proportions. Inflation is poised to rise, real incomes to fall and unemployment to increase. Retaliatory tariffs would weaken the economy further.

    So even in the absence of demand reallocation, foreign demand can be expected to decline if there is a broad increase in tariffs. The depth and persistence of this decline will also depend on other policies, such as tax and spending cuts and deregulation.

    And it will crucially depend on the final outcome of tariff negotiations, which is likely to be far less severe than the 2 April announcement.

    The second factor affecting the severity of the demand shock relates to the degree of demand reallocation – that is, the elasticity of substitution between foreign and domestic products. This elasticity is highly uncertain and varies across industries, products and countries.[28]

    However, a robust finding in the literature is that products that are more differentiated tend to be relatively price-inelastic, as they are more difficult to substitute.

    This has great relevance for the euro area, where the bulk of exports to the United States comprise pharmaceuticals, machinery, vehicles and chemicals. These goods are typically highly differentiated (Slide 8, left-hand side).

    For instance, the supply of machines for producing semiconductors is basically monopolised by one Dutch company. Similarly, banknotes in the United States are overwhelmingly printed using machinery from a single German manufacturer.

    These and other machines are not easy to replace in the short run, giving euro area exporters leverage to pass higher costs on to foreign importers and limiting the hit to foreign demand.

    In addition, trade diversion may benefit euro area exports.

    Should prohibitive tariffs on Chinese imports remain in place, they will measurably raise the euro area’s price competitiveness in the US market. This can be expected to stimulate demand for euro area goods if there are no alternatives in the United States itself, especially as the number of industries in which both Chinese and euro area firms have comparative advantages has increased measurably over the past two decades (Slide 8, right-hand side).[29]

    New research corroborates this view.[30] It finds that the euro area stands to win in relative terms from a global trade war, as its net exports to the world will rise rather than fall as global demand is reallocated across the global network, offsetting the hit to domestic consumption.[31]

    In other words, for as long as tariffs are not prohibitive to trade and the uncertainty paralysing activity fades, aggregate euro area foreign demand may prove relatively resilient under a range of potential tariff outcomes.

    The recent appreciation of the euro does not refute this view.

    The euro has gone through two distinct phases since the US presidential election in November last year. It first depreciated in nominal effective terms by 3% until mid-February, before starting to appreciate. So, in net terms, the euro is trading just 2.6% above last year’s average.

    In addition, as most exports to the United States are invoiced in US dollars, the pass-through of changes in the exchange rate to import prices tends to be moderate – by recent estimates just about one-fifth.[32] And potential losses in price competitiveness in third countries are in part compensated by lower import costs, as euro area exports have, on average, a large import content.

    This price inelasticity is also reflected in recent surveys, with manufacturing firms reporting an expansion in output for the first time in more than two years (Slide 9). Also, fewer firms are reporting falling export orders.

    Even if part of these developments may reflect frontloading by firms, it is remarkable how resilient sentiment has remained in the face of the extraordinary increase in economic uncertainty.

    Supply shock puts upward pressure on inflation, reinforced by global supply chains

    The downward effects on inflation caused by lower demand are likely to be offset, partly or even fully, by the supply shock hitting the euro area through retaliatory tariffs imposed by the EU and other economies.

    The strength of this supply shock also depends on two factors.

    One is the extent to which firms pass higher tariffs on to consumers.

    In the United States, evidence from the 2018 tariff increase suggests that, in most cases, the pass-through to import prices was de facto complete.[33] At the same time, many firms chose to absorb part of the increase in import prices in their profit margins, thereby limiting the increase in consumer price inflation, at least in the short run.[34]

    Whether firms will respond similarly to a renewed rise in tariffs in the current environment is uncertain.

    On the one hand, the recent appreciation of the euro, if persistent, provides some margin for euro area firms to buffer cost increases from retaliatory tariffs. On the other hand, profit margins have already been squeezed by high wage growth and a sluggish economy, and the post-pandemic inflation surge may have lowered the bar for firms to pass higher costs on to consumers.

    Overall, recent surveys of companies in the United States and the euro area suggest that they plan to gradually pass higher tariffs on to consumers over the coming years.[35]

    In addition, in order to compensate for the hit to input costs, firms also tend to raise the prices of goods not directly affected by tariffs. There is evidence that retailers broadly adjust price markups even if only a subset of wholesale prices change.[36]

    The second, and related, factor determining the strength of the supply shock relates to global value chains.

    Unlike during the wave of protectionism in the 1930s, today the dominant share of international trade, about 70%, reflects multinational firms distributing production across countries and along the value chain to minimise costs. In this process, parts and components often cross borders many times.

    Prohibitive tariffs between the United States and China are already disrupting supply chains. Shipments of goods are declining, potentially causing future shortages of critical intermediate goods that could reverberate across the world.

    While current conditions are very different from those seen during the pandemic, when supply chain disruptions were a main factor driving the surge in inflation, the impact of tariffs is likely to be amplified as the increase in firms’ marginal costs propagates through the production network.

    ECB staff analysis shows that, even if the EU does not retaliate, higher production costs transmitted through global value chains could more than offset the disinflationary pressure coming from lower foreign demand, making tariffs inflationary overall (Slide 10, left-hand side).[37]

    These effects will become stronger with full retaliation, including intermediate goods. So far, the EU’s retaliatory measures have disproportionately targeted final consumer goods, such as beverages, food and home appliances – precisely to avoid broader cost effects being transmitted through value chains (Slide 10, right-hand side).

    But if the trade conflict intensifies, the scale of retaliation will widen and increasingly include intermediate goods, as these account for nearly 70% of euro area imports from the United States.

    In other words, retaliatory tariffs on intermediate goods would constitute a much broader cost-push shock for euro area firms, reminiscent of the post-pandemic supply chain disruptions.[38]

    It is possible that these effects will be mitigated by China redirecting goods originally destined for the United States towards the euro area and other economies at a discount.

    In practice, however, this mitigation channel is likely to be contained. India, for example, has already raised temporary tariffs on China to curb a surge in imports. Similarly, the European Commission has repeatedly clarified that it intends to protect euro area firms against dumping prices should imports from China rise significantly in response to the evolving trade conflict with the United States.[39]

    Policy implications

    How, then, should the ECB respond to the current shocks?

    The lessons from the post-pandemic surge in inflation suggest that, from today’s perspective, the appropriate course of action is to keep rates close to where they are today – that is, firmly in neutral territory.

    A “steady hand” policy provides the best insurance against a wide range of potential outcomes. In other words, it is robust to many contingencies.

    Specifically, it avoids reacting excessively to volatility in headline inflation at a time when domestic inflation remains sticky and new forces are putting upward pressure on underlying inflation over the medium term. Given lags in policy transmission, an accommodative policy stance could amplify risks to medium-term price stability.

    This steady hand policy also avoids overreacting to concerns that tariffs may destabilise inflation expectations once again.

    In recent months, households’ short-term inflation expectations have reversed and started rising again. According to the ECB’s Consumer Expectations Survey, expectations for inflation one year ahead increased to 2.9% in March from their trough of 2.4% in September 2024 (Slide 11, left-hand side). Qualitative inflation expectations, as measured by the European Commission, even rose to levels last seen in late 2022 (Slide 11, right-hand side).

    Currently, there are no indications that this rise is persistent, or that inflation expectations are at risk of unanchoring.

    Hence, we can afford to look through the rise in short-term inflation expectations. This could change if we see clear signs of a strong and front-loaded pass-through of potential tariff increases – something that could bring us back to the steep part of the Phillips curve. So far, however, evidence suggests that firms have notably slowed the frequency with which they revise their prices.

    A steady hand policy also addresses risks of a more substantial decline in aggregate demand in response to the trade conflict.

    If tight labour markets were the main culprit for the recent steepening of the Phillips curve, risks of a sharp decline in inflation caused by a rise in unemployment are much more moderate today.

    The reason for this is that in both the United States and the euro area, the vacancy-to-unemployment ratio has fallen markedly and is now at a level that suggests that labour markets are much more balanced (Slide 12).

    We are thus likely to be operating close to, or at, the flat part of the Phillips curve where a change in unemployment has only limited effects on underlying inflation, in stark contrast to the high inflation period.[40]

    We would only need to react more forcefully to the tariff shock if we observed a sharp deterioration in labour market conditions or an unanchoring of inflation expectations to the downside.

    Both seem unlikely at the current juncture.

    Despite the number of vacancies declining, the euro area labour market has proven resilient, with unemployment at a record low. And most measures of medium-term inflation expectations remain tilted to the upside, including those of professional forecasters (Slide 13).

    Conclusion

    My main message today, and with this I would like to conclude, is therefore simple: now is the time to keep a steady hand.

    In the current environment of elevated volatility, the ECB needs to remain focused on the medium term. Given long and variable transmission lags, reacting to short-term developments could result in the peak impact of our policy only unfolding when the current disinflationary forces have passed.

    Over the medium term, risks to euro area inflation are likely tilted to the upside, reflecting both the increase in fiscal spending and the risks of renewed cost-push shocks from tariffs propagating through global value chains.

    Therefore, from today’s perspective, an accommodative monetary policy stance would be inappropriate, also because recent inflation data suggest that past shocks may unwind more slowly than previously anticipated.

    By keeping interest rates near their current levels, we can be confident that monetary policy is neither excessively holding back growth and employment, nor stimulating it. We are thus in a good place to evaluate the likely future evolution of the economy and to take action if risks materialise that threaten price stability.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Isabel Schnabel: Keeping a steady hand in an unsteady world

    Source: European Central Bank

    Speech by Isabel Schnabel, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, at Hoover Monetary Policy Conference “Finishing the Job and New Challenges”, Stanford University

    Stanford, 10 May 2025

    Standard theory of monetary policy rests on a simple premise: a stable relationship between inflation and the output gap. This is the logic behind the Phillips curve, which, in its most common form, relates inflation to a measure of economic slack, expected inflation and supply shocks.[1]

    The relationship between output and inflation was already under scrutiny well before the pandemic.

    After the global financial crisis of 2008, inflation didn’t fall nearly as much as had been implied by conventional Phillips curve estimates. And once economies around the world recovered and unemployment fell, the bounce-back in inflation fell short of model predictions.

    This is why that episode is known as the period of “missing deflation” and “missing inflation”.[2]

    The situation changed fundamentally in the aftermath of the pandemic, when the relationship between inflation and the output gap proved to be much stronger than what would have been expected based on historical estimates. We observed a noticeably steeper Phillips curve across advanced economies, including the euro area (Slide 2).[3]

    In my remarks today, I would like to draw lessons from the instability of the Phillips curve over the past 20 years for the optimal conduct of monetary policy. I will argue that the evidence of a re-flattening of the Phillips curve after the long period of high inflation suggests that, in the euro area, the most appropriate policy response to the potential risks to price stability arising from fiscal expansion and protectionism is to keep a steady hand and maintain rates close to where they are today – that is, firmly in neutral territory.

    Monetary policy and the slope of the Phillips curve

    The slope of the Phillips curve has first-order implications for the conduct of monetary policy.

    If the curve is steep, as it appeared to be in recent years, monetary policy is highly effective in reducing inflation, with only a limited impact on growth and employment. The smaller “sacrifice ratio” suggests that central banks should react more forcefully to deviations of inflation from target, even when the economy is hit by a supply shock that pushes inflation up and output down.[4]

    A steep Phillips curve hence improves the trade-off facing central banks, weakening the case for “looking through”, as forceful policy action minimises the risks of inflation expectations unanchoring and of inflation becoming entrenched.[5]

    Policy prescriptions differ fundamentally if the Phillips curve is flat.

    In this case, a large policy impulse is required to move output sufficiently to generate aggregate price effects. It can then be optimal for policy to tolerate moderate deviations of inflation from target, as the cost of closing a small inflation gap relative to the target may exceed the benefits.

    This prescription holds in both directions.

    When inflation is above the target, a flat Phillips curve would require a sharp rise in policy rates to bring medium-term inflation down from, say, 2.3% to 2%. Such a course of action may imply a substantial rise in unemployment and may thus not be welfare-improving for society at large – a trade-off central banks may face during the last mile of disinflation.[6]

    The experience of the 2010s, when inflation was persistently below the target, demonstrates that the argument also holds in the opposite direction.

    If bringing inflation up from 1.7% to 2%, for example, requires purchasing a large fraction of outstanding government bonds and making potentially time-inconsistent promises about the future path of interest rates, then the central bank must consider carefully whether the benefits outweigh the costs, such as making losses in the future, market dysfunction, rising wealth inequality, financial instability and threats to its reputation.[7]

    The role of inflation expectations

    However, the ability to tolerate moderate deviations of inflation from target critically hinges on a firm anchoring of inflation expectations – that is, a low sensitivity of inflation expectations to realised inflation.

    If inflation expectations are well-anchored, policymakers can tolerate moderate deviations from target, as fluctuations in inflation tend to fade away. If, however, inflation expectations are at risk of unanchoring, central banks should act forcefully.[8]

    There are two challenges to this strategy.

    One is that the anchoring of inflation expectations is endogenous. Central banks themselves can cause an unanchoring if inaction in the face of price shocks is perceived as weakening its commitment to securing price stability.[9]

    History shows that it can be costly to reestablish the credibility of the nominal anchor once it has been lost. This is also because inflation expectations are path-dependent. Research shows that the experience of high inflation may raise the sensitivity of inflation expectations to new inflation surprises.[10]

    The other challenge is that different measures of inflation expectations often yield different results (Slide 3). As such, robust trends cannot easily be identified in real time, much like the slope of the Phillips curve.[11]

    Measures of inflation expectations can even point in opposite directions. Research from the early days of the pandemic showed that most consumers expected the pandemic to raise prices, contrary to the views held by professional forecasters at the time.[12]

    State-dependent pricing and tight labour markets can explain steeper Phillips curve and post-pandemic inflation surge

    The recent period of high inflation illustrates how sensitive policy conclusions can be to the assessment of the slope of the Phillips curve and to measures of inflation expectations that central banks use in their analysis.

    Two key theories have been proposed to explain the post-pandemic inflation surge.[13]

    The first relates to firms’ price-setting behaviour.

    Standard New Keynesian models assume that the probability of firms resetting their prices is constant over time. This is a fair description of aggregate price movements when inflation is low and aggregate shocks are small (Slide 4).

    However, the past few years have demonstrated that this “linear” relationship breaks down in the face of large shocks.[14] When marginal costs increase rapidly and threaten to erode profit margins, firms tend to raise their prices more frequently. As a result, the Phillips curve steepens.

    This feedback loop is strongly asymmetric.[15] It acts as an inflation accelerator when firms face positive demand or adverse cost-push shocks.[16] But it does little to firms’ pricing strategies in the face of disinflationary shocks due to downward price rigidities.

    This helps explain why inflation did not fall much when the pandemic broke out but increased sharply after the reopening of our economies (Slide 5).[17]

    The second theory relates to the tightness of the labour market.

    Downward nominal wage rigidity has been a key factor explaining the “missing deflation” in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.[18] If nominal wages do not fall, or fall only very slowly, firms’ marginal costs change only moderately, and hence disinflationary pressures face a natural lower bound, even if slack is large.

    But when the labour market is tight, wages are more flexible as firms outbid each other in securing their desired workforce.

    Benigno and Eggertsson show that this channel led to a non-linear inflation surge in the United States whenever the number of job vacancies exceeded the number of unemployed workers (Slide 6).[19] In the euro area, the threshold was lower, but the curve still exhibited strong signs of non-linearity.

    Rising near-term inflation expectations may have shifted the Phillips curve up

    New research for the United States, however, suggests that the evidence in favour of the second theory is not very robust.

    Specifically, the finding of non-linearity depends critically on which measure is used to control for inflation expectations: non-linearity holds when controlling for expectations of professional forecasters, but it disappears once inflation expectations of households and firms are considered.[20]

    In other words, it is conceivable that the Phillips curve did not become steeper but rather shifted upwards as inflation expectations rose.[21] Non-linearity has also been rejected recently using a similar approach based on regional data for the euro area.[22]

    Moreover, the expectations that are relevant for such an upward shift are not necessarily the longer-term expectations that central banks typically pay most attention to.

    These have remained remarkably stable over the past few years (Slide 7).

    Rather, inflation expectations over the near term, such as the next 12 months, may be more important in driving macroeconomic outcomes.

    Bernanke and Blanchard, for example, show that one-year-ahead inflation expectations explain a significant share of the recent marked rise in nominal wages, and hence inflation, in the United States.[23] Similar evidence has been found for the euro area and other advanced economies.[24]

    Again, there appears to be an asymmetry: the risks that the Phillips curve shifts downwards are substantially lower. Research shows that consumers tend to respond more to inflationary than disinflationary news, as households value increases in their purchasing power and as they pay less attention to inflation when it is low.[25]

    The impact of tariffs on inflation in the euro area

    Understanding the reasons behind the recent inflation surge is not only important from a conceptual perspective. It also matters for setting monetary policy today, as we are once again confronted with historically large shocks.

    For central banks, this is a difficult environment to navigate.

    Memories of high inflation are still fresh after a long period of sharply rising prices. And just as during the pandemic, there is considerable uncertainty about how firms and households are going to respond to shocks that are largely outside the historical empirical range.

    Ultimately, the impact of current shocks on prices and wages, and hence the appropriate monetary policy response, will depend on the shape and location of the Phillips curve.

    Monetary policy should focus on the medium term and underlying inflation

    Let me illustrate this by looking at the euro area.

    Given the lags in policy transmission, the relevant horizon for monetary policy is the medium term. The past few years, however, demonstrated that inflation forecasting at times of large structural shocks is inherently difficult and plagued by large uncertainty.

    For this reason, the ECB and other central banks have increasingly turned to a data-dependent approach to monetary policy, where the observed dynamics of underlying inflation and the strength of monetary transmission are used to cross-check the inflation projections.[26]

    This approach remains valid today.[27] But data dependence is not in contrast to being forward-looking.

    In the current situation, the high level of economic uncertainty, together with the sharp fall in energy prices and a stronger euro exchange rate, will likely dampen headline inflation in the short run, potentially pushing it below our 2% target.

    The question is whether these developments provide meaningful signals about the net impact of current shocks on medium-term inflation.

    During the pandemic, for example, a strong appreciation of the euro against the US dollar, by nearly 14% over seven months, and a marked decline in energy prices were followed by a historical inflation surge.

    Data dependency hence requires examining the potential channels through which current shocks could affect underlying inflation over the medium term.

    In the euro area, there are two main forces that could have the size and persistence to pull underlying inflation sustainably away from our 2% medium-term target.

    One is fiscal policy, which is set to expand on a scale unseen outside periods of deep economic contraction.

    Germany has eased its constitutional debt brake for defence-related spending, and has committed to spending €500 billion, or more than 10% of GDP, on infrastructure and the green transition over the next 12 years. In addition, the European Commission has invited Member States to activate the national escape clause to accommodate increased defence expenditure across the EU.

    The impact of these measures on inflation will depend on how they are implemented, especially their impact on the supply side of the economy. But on balance, the fiscal impulse is likely to put upward pressure on underlying inflation over the medium term.

    Global fragmentation is the second force that could have a lasting impact on prices and wages.

    As we speak, the scale and scope of tariffs, the extent of retaliation as well as how financial markets respond to these developments all remain highly uncertain.

    Ongoing negotiations are a sign that mutually beneficial agreements may still be reached. An ideal outcome – the “zero-for-zero” tariff agreement advocated by the European Commission – could even boost growth and employment on both sides of the Atlantic.

    However, should these negotiations fail, the euro area will simultaneously face adverse supply and demand shocks, as the EU has announced that it will retaliate against higher tariffs.

    Similar to the pandemic, assessing the relative strength of these forces is inherently difficult. Overall, however, there are risks that a lasting and meaningful increase in tariffs will reinforce the upward pressure on underlying inflation arising from higher fiscal spending over the medium term.

    To see this, it is useful to look at the factors driving the macroeconomic propagation of tariffs.

    Euro area foreign demand may prove resilient, with limited effects on inflation

    The severity of the negative demand shock will depend on two factors.

    One is the hit to economic activity in the United States and to global demand from raising tariffs across the board. Under the 2 April tariff rates, the United States will face a supply shock of historic proportions. Inflation is poised to rise, real incomes to fall and unemployment to increase. Retaliatory tariffs would weaken the economy further.

    So even in the absence of demand reallocation, foreign demand can be expected to decline if there is a broad increase in tariffs. The depth and persistence of this decline will also depend on other policies, such as tax and spending cuts and deregulation.

    And it will crucially depend on the final outcome of tariff negotiations, which is likely to be far less severe than the 2 April announcement.

    The second factor affecting the severity of the demand shock relates to the degree of demand reallocation – that is, the elasticity of substitution between foreign and domestic products. This elasticity is highly uncertain and varies across industries, products and countries.[28]

    However, a robust finding in the literature is that products that are more differentiated tend to be relatively price-inelastic, as they are more difficult to substitute.

    This has great relevance for the euro area, where the bulk of exports to the United States comprise pharmaceuticals, machinery, vehicles and chemicals. These goods are typically highly differentiated (Slide 8, left-hand side).

    For instance, the supply of machines for producing semiconductors is basically monopolised by one Dutch company. Similarly, banknotes in the United States are overwhelmingly printed using machinery from a single German manufacturer.

    These and other machines are not easy to replace in the short run, giving euro area exporters leverage to pass higher costs on to foreign importers and limiting the hit to foreign demand.

    In addition, trade diversion may benefit euro area exports.

    Should prohibitive tariffs on Chinese imports remain in place, they will measurably raise the euro area’s price competitiveness in the US market. This can be expected to stimulate demand for euro area goods if there are no alternatives in the United States itself, especially as the number of industries in which both Chinese and euro area firms have comparative advantages has increased measurably over the past two decades (Slide 8, right-hand side).[29]

    New research corroborates this view.[30] It finds that the euro area stands to win in relative terms from a global trade war, as its net exports to the world will rise rather than fall as global demand is reallocated across the global network, offsetting the hit to domestic consumption.[31]

    In other words, for as long as tariffs are not prohibitive to trade and the uncertainty paralysing activity fades, aggregate euro area foreign demand may prove relatively resilient under a range of potential tariff outcomes.

    The recent appreciation of the euro does not refute this view.

    The euro has gone through two distinct phases since the US presidential election in November last year. It first depreciated in nominal effective terms by 3% until mid-February, before starting to appreciate. So, in net terms, the euro is trading just 2.6% above last year’s average.

    In addition, as most exports to the United States are invoiced in US dollars, the pass-through of changes in the exchange rate to import prices tends to be moderate – by recent estimates just about one-fifth.[32] And potential losses in price competitiveness in third countries are in part compensated by lower import costs, as euro area exports have, on average, a large import content.

    This price inelasticity is also reflected in recent surveys, with manufacturing firms reporting an expansion in output for the first time in more than two years (Slide 9). Also, fewer firms are reporting falling export orders.

    Even if part of these developments may reflect frontloading by firms, it is remarkable how resilient sentiment has remained in the face of the extraordinary increase in economic uncertainty.

    Supply shock puts upward pressure on inflation, reinforced by global supply chains

    The downward effects on inflation caused by lower demand are likely to be offset, partly or even fully, by the supply shock hitting the euro area through retaliatory tariffs imposed by the EU and other economies.

    The strength of this supply shock also depends on two factors.

    One is the extent to which firms pass higher tariffs on to consumers.

    In the United States, evidence from the 2018 tariff increase suggests that, in most cases, the pass-through to import prices was de facto complete.[33] At the same time, many firms chose to absorb part of the increase in import prices in their profit margins, thereby limiting the increase in consumer price inflation, at least in the short run.[34]

    Whether firms will respond similarly to a renewed rise in tariffs in the current environment is uncertain.

    On the one hand, the recent appreciation of the euro, if persistent, provides some margin for euro area firms to buffer cost increases from retaliatory tariffs. On the other hand, profit margins have already been squeezed by high wage growth and a sluggish economy, and the post-pandemic inflation surge may have lowered the bar for firms to pass higher costs on to consumers.

    Overall, recent surveys of companies in the United States and the euro area suggest that they plan to gradually pass higher tariffs on to consumers over the coming years.[35]

    In addition, in order to compensate for the hit to input costs, firms also tend to raise the prices of goods not directly affected by tariffs. There is evidence that retailers broadly adjust price markups even if only a subset of wholesale prices change.[36]

    The second, and related, factor determining the strength of the supply shock relates to global value chains.

    Unlike during the wave of protectionism in the 1930s, today the dominant share of international trade, about 70%, reflects multinational firms distributing production across countries and along the value chain to minimise costs. In this process, parts and components often cross borders many times.

    Prohibitive tariffs between the United States and China are already disrupting supply chains. Shipments of goods are declining, potentially causing future shortages of critical intermediate goods that could reverberate across the world.

    While current conditions are very different from those seen during the pandemic, when supply chain disruptions were a main factor driving the surge in inflation, the impact of tariffs is likely to be amplified as the increase in firms’ marginal costs propagates through the production network.

    ECB staff analysis shows that, even if the EU does not retaliate, higher production costs transmitted through global value chains could more than offset the disinflationary pressure coming from lower foreign demand, making tariffs inflationary overall (Slide 10, left-hand side).[37]

    These effects will become stronger with full retaliation, including intermediate goods. So far, the EU’s retaliatory measures have disproportionately targeted final consumer goods, such as beverages, food and home appliances – precisely to avoid broader cost effects being transmitted through value chains (Slide 10, right-hand side).

    But if the trade conflict intensifies, the scale of retaliation will widen and increasingly include intermediate goods, as these account for nearly 70% of euro area imports from the United States.

    In other words, retaliatory tariffs on intermediate goods would constitute a much broader cost-push shock for euro area firms, reminiscent of the post-pandemic supply chain disruptions.[38]

    It is possible that these effects will be mitigated by China redirecting goods originally destined for the United States towards the euro area and other economies at a discount.

    In practice, however, this mitigation channel is likely to be contained. India, for example, has already raised temporary tariffs on China to curb a surge in imports. Similarly, the European Commission has repeatedly clarified that it intends to protect euro area firms against dumping prices should imports from China rise significantly in response to the evolving trade conflict with the United States.[39]

    Policy implications

    How, then, should the ECB respond to the current shocks?

    The lessons from the post-pandemic surge in inflation suggest that, from today’s perspective, the appropriate course of action is to keep rates close to where they are today – that is, firmly in neutral territory.

    A “steady hand” policy provides the best insurance against a wide range of potential outcomes. In other words, it is robust to many contingencies.

    Specifically, it avoids reacting excessively to volatility in headline inflation at a time when domestic inflation remains sticky and new forces are putting upward pressure on underlying inflation over the medium term. Given lags in policy transmission, an accommodative policy stance could amplify risks to medium-term price stability.

    This steady hand policy also avoids overreacting to concerns that tariffs may destabilise inflation expectations once again.

    In recent months, households’ short-term inflation expectations have reversed and started rising again. According to the ECB’s Consumer Expectations Survey, expectations for inflation one year ahead increased to 2.9% in March from their trough of 2.4% in September 2024 (Slide 11, left-hand side). Qualitative inflation expectations, as measured by the European Commission, even rose to levels last seen in late 2022 (Slide 11, right-hand side).

    Currently, there are no indications that this rise is persistent, or that inflation expectations are at risk of unanchoring.

    Hence, we can afford to look through the rise in short-term inflation expectations. This could change if we see clear signs of a strong and front-loaded pass-through of potential tariff increases – something that could bring us back to the steep part of the Phillips curve. So far, however, evidence suggests that firms have notably slowed the frequency with which they revise their prices.

    A steady hand policy also addresses risks of a more substantial decline in aggregate demand in response to the trade conflict.

    If tight labour markets were the main culprit for the recent steepening of the Phillips curve, risks of a sharp decline in inflation caused by a rise in unemployment are much more moderate today.

    The reason for this is that in both the United States and the euro area, the vacancy-to-unemployment ratio has fallen markedly and is now at a level that suggests that labour markets are much more balanced (Slide 12).

    We are thus likely to be operating close to, or at, the flat part of the Phillips curve where a change in unemployment has only limited effects on underlying inflation, in stark contrast to the high inflation period.[40]

    We would only need to react more forcefully to the tariff shock if we observed a sharp deterioration in labour market conditions or an unanchoring of inflation expectations to the downside.

    Both seem unlikely at the current juncture.

    Despite the number of vacancies declining, the euro area labour market has proven resilient, with unemployment at a record low. And most measures of medium-term inflation expectations remain tilted to the upside, including those of professional forecasters (Slide 13).

    Conclusion

    My main message today, and with this I would like to conclude, is therefore simple: now is the time to keep a steady hand.

    In the current environment of elevated volatility, the ECB needs to remain focused on the medium term. Given long and variable transmission lags, reacting to short-term developments could result in the peak impact of our policy only unfolding when the current disinflationary forces have passed.

    Over the medium term, risks to euro area inflation are likely tilted to the upside, reflecting both the increase in fiscal spending and the risks of renewed cost-push shocks from tariffs propagating through global value chains.

    Therefore, from today’s perspective, an accommodative monetary policy stance would be inappropriate, also because recent inflation data suggest that past shocks may unwind more slowly than previously anticipated.

    By keeping interest rates near their current levels, we can be confident that monetary policy is neither excessively holding back growth and employment, nor stimulating it. We are thus in a good place to evaluate the likely future evolution of the economy and to take action if risks materialise that threaten price stability.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI USA: Reps. Ramirez & Lieu, Senator Durbin Meet with Business Owners, Call to Protect Diverse Small Businesses’ Funding

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Delia Ramirez – Illinois (3rd District)

    CHICAGO, IL — Today,  Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03) hosted Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL), House Democrats Vice-Chair Congressman Ted Lieu (CA-36), and Cook County Commissioner Jessica Vásquez for a business crawl of the Milwaukee Avenue’s business corridor to commemorate National Small Business Week. During the crawl, the members of Congress heard directly from business owners about the impact that the Trump Administration’s funding cuts and service reductions will have on diverse small businesses and local economies. 

    After the announcement of Trump’s record-breaking proposed defunding of federal services and programs, the Members of Congress held a press conference to demand that the Administration restore the funding for diversity and equity programs and reopen the Small Business Administration (SBA) offices in jurisdictions that protect immigrants’ rights, and end the trade war

    “The Milwaukee Ave Business Corridor is not only a reminder of how our communities’ small businesses grow our local and national economies, but also of how interconnected they are to global markets. From Poland to Puerto Rico, from China to Colombia, countless immigrant families have chosen Milwaukee Avenue to set up shop and share their culture, cuisine, and craft,” said Congresswoman Ramirez. “While the Trump Administration turns its back on small business owners, I’m standing in coalition with Senator Durbin, Congressman Ted Lieu, Commissioner Jessica Vasquez, and local leaders and business owners to fight back for our local, diverse, equitable, and inclusive economies.”

    “Small businesses are the backbone of our communities and economies,” said Senator Durbin. “Illinois is home to more than 1.2 million small businesses, which should be something to celebrate this National Small Business Week. Instead, our local store owners, like the ones I was fortunate to visit today, find themselves facing worker shortages and chaos caused by Trump’s trade war. I’ll continue to do all I can, alongside members of the House like Representatives Ramirez and Lieu, to fight for our local businesses at the federal level and lower costs for the American people.”

    “Trump’s indiscriminate tariffs make no sense. Now, small businesses and consumers are paying more for food and products. We had a growing economy at the end of 2024. Unfortunately, Trump’s policies have led us to negative GDP growth,” said Congressman Lieu. “Today, we are here to highlight the difficulties small businesses are facing and to tell the Trump administration they need to stop the indiscriminate tariffs. They are hurting our economies, American consumers, and businesses. Thank you, Congresswoman Ramirez, for your representation.”

    During the crawl, the public officials visited multiple businesses, including Magnífico Coffee Roasters & Coffee Shop  (Colombian-owned family business), Friendship Chinese (Asian-American owned restaurant, Michelin-recommended), the RCM Studios (Black-owned recording studio), and Kurowski’s Sausage Shop (staple Polish market).

    For photos and videos of the event, CLICK HERE.

    For a live stream of the press conference, CLICK HERE.

    BACKGROUND:

    The Trump Administration’s 30% cuts to SBA are expected to negatively impact local communities’ access to Small Business Development Centers, reducing resources for local business owners. Under the Trump Administration, 15 SBA Entrepreneurial Development programs have been eliminated, including the Veterans’ Business Outreach Program, the National Women’s Business Council, and Women’s Business Centers. 

    More than 90% of small businesses rely on imported goods for everything from products to construction materials. Trump’s tariffs will raise prices for businesses and are expected to cost families an extra $3,800 a yearIn a recent poll, 70% of small business owners said they believe the country is headed towards a recession.

    The Trump Administration’s anti-immigrant agenda is also affecting business. Beyond the persecution of immigrant workers, 1 in 5 businesses are started by immigrant families, including undocumented immigrants and mixed-status families. The Trump Administration’s decision to close the offices in sanctuary jurisdictions and limit the funding for immigrant businesses will hurt local economies. 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: PHOTOS: Capito Celebrates 30 Years of Niterra’s Sissonville Campus and Expansion

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for West Virginia Shelley Moore Capito

    SISSONVILLE, W.Va. – Today, U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) traveled to Sissonville, W.Va. where she delivered remarks celebrating the 30th anniversary of Niterra North America’s Sissonville campus, as well as the grand opening of the company’s new state-of-the art distribution center. The expansion will grow the Sissonville campus by 75,000 square feet and create around 30 new jobs, allowing Niterra to serve customers and support continued growth.

    “I was proud to visit Niterra’s facility in Sissonville as they celebrate 30 years of investment, innovation, and job creation in West Virginia,” Senator Capito said. “Their continued growth, including this latest expansion, is a testament to the strength of our workforce and the opportunities we’re creating to build a stronger economy right here at home.”

    “We are incredibly proud to reach this 30-year milestone,” Michael Schwab, President & CEO of Niterra North America, Inc., said. “Our success is a testament to the hard work and dedication of our employees, the loyalty of our customers, and the support of the Sissonville community. The opening of our new distribution center is a significant step forward in our journey, expanding operational capacity and improving logistics efficiency. We look forward to many more years of success.”

    Photos from today’s visit are below:

    U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) visits Niterra North America in Sissonville, W.Va. on Friday, May 9, 2025.

    U.S. Senator Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) pictured with Niterra North America Chairman and CEO Shinichi Odo at Niterra’s Sissonville, W.Va. facility on Friday, May 9, 2025.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Murkowski Working with FBI Director to Address MMIWG and Fentanyl in Alaska

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alaska Lisa Murkowski
    05.09.25
    Washington, DC – During a U.S. Senate Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations Subcommittee hearing this week, U.S. Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) secured commitments from the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) to work with her on critical public safety issues for Alaska. As Alaska struggles with Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls cases and fentanyl-related deaths, Director Kash Patel pledged to make Alaska a priority as the Bureau addresses these life-and-death matters.
    Click here to watch the Senator’s full line of questioning.
    The full transcript of Murkowski’s comments is below.
    Murkowski: Director, good morning. This a week that a lot of Alaskans are paying attention to. Monday was the day that we recognize Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls Awareness day. I’ve just been going through the morning clips, not while you have been testifying of course, but this morning. And there’s accounts in Anchorage, Juneau, and Fairbanks, and marches in Nome, all recounting very painful stories that families have endured, of their family members who have gone missing, where law enforcement just was not present for a host of different reasons. You and I talked about this prior to your confirmation and it is something that I have been working on for a period of years now. We have made some good progress under the first Trump Administration. There was a focus called ‘Operation Lady Justice’ and now I am pleased to see that we have this expanded to what you’re calling ‘Operation Not Forgotten,’ to look into unresolved violent crimes in Indian Country including cases involving missing/murdered indigenous persons.
    I am looking critically at the budget here and wondering if you can share with me how the budget requests, or what we have of it at this point in time, will support this expansion of ‘Operation Not Forgotten’. I need to be able to give folks back home the comfort that they need to know that these cases that have gone cold, for not just months and years, but decades, will not be dropped. That that push for closure will continue. What can you share with me this morning?
    Patel: Senator, I greatly appreciate you highlighting and being a champion of crimes on Indian Country. And just this week I was the first FBI Director in U.S. History to sit down at the Department of the Interior with the Tribal leaders at the STAT level. I also met privately with the parents of Emily Pike, who was tragically butchered on a reservation in Arizona and her parents asked me to find the remaining pieces of her body that have not been returned. She is a 14-year-old girl, she is still missing her arms, they only have her torso. What I told them, and what I hope you take back to Alaska and what the rest of the tribal community hears, is that every crime in this country will be treated equally. Those that happen on Indian Country and those that are happening to Native Americans are just as horrific as those happening in the rest of America. We’ve already prioritized resources in our state level task forces to address these matters. And I asked the staff to allow FBI agents onto reservations on a more regular basis and engage with them directly. I also invited the community leaders to nominate a law enforcement officer from one of the tribal jurisdictions to sit with me at the Hoover Building in the FBI so that we have a direct engagement with the community. So, we are, just one highlight, I think in Wind River, we executed an operation that took down, I can’t remember how many dozens of pounds of fentanyl that was heading to an Indian reservation. So, you have my commitment that we will not forget it.
    Murkowski: Well thank you for that broader commitment. As you know of, course, we don’t have reservations in Alaska, we don’t have the same type of tribal law enforcement presence. So, some unique aspects of it. My understanding is the Alaska field office in Anchorage, along with the two satellite offices that we have, one in Fairbanks and one in Juneau, they have one FBI Victim Service Coordinator to communicate with these families. This has been part of the problem. It’s radio silence out of the agency. They don’t know whether a case is being pursued, they hear nothing. So, I would ask that you look, as you’re looking at your budget, to make sure that the FBI does include support for Victim Service Coordinators on this. It’s a gap that is missing right now.
    Very quickly, we also talked about the fentanyl crisis in Alaska. We are the one state that tragically is going the wrong way when it comes to fentanyl deaths. We had a 40% increase in fentanyl deaths in 2023. You had indicated that you would be doing aggressive work here. We need to be doing more and I’ve shared that it ought to be easier intercept drugs that are coming into Alaska because they come in by air plane, they come through the mail, and they occasionally come in by boat. Maybe a little bit driving across through the border. But we’ve got the ability to do the interception and right now our numbers are not going down. I just ask for your continued commitment with this. We are seeing FBI partnering with ICE for arrests and detentions of immigrants in Alaska. Folks are asking me, “are we using FBI resources?” Redirecting them from the fentanyl crisis to perhaps perusing that have been targeted immigrants even though they aren’t violent criminals. So, I’d love to have further conversations with you on some of these Alaska specifics, but we have got to start turning that corner on fentanyl.
    Patel: Yes, ma’am, and I think you know this: we are sending a plus up to Alaska in part of this movement out to the field and we will look to address those specific issues, and I will work with you and your office to make sure that Alaska is not forgotten and that we emphasize it.
    Murkowski: Very good, appreciate it. Thank you very much.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Tracing radiation through the Marshall Islands: Reflections from a veteran Greenpeace nuclear campaigner

    SPECIAL REPORT: By Shaun Burnie of Greenpeace

    We’ve visited Ground Zero. Not once, but three times. But for generations, before these locations were designated as such, they were the ancestral home to the people of the Marshall Islands.

    As part of a team of Greenpeace scientists and specialists from the Radiation Protection Advisers team, we have embarked on a six-week tour on board the Rainbow Warrior, sailing through one of the most disturbing chapters in human history: between 1946 and 1958, the United States detonated 67 nuclear bombs across the Marshall Islands — equivalent to 7200 Hiroshima explosions.

    During this period, testing nuclear weapons at the expense of wonderful ocean nations like the Marshall Islands was considered an acceptable practice, or as the US put it, “for the good of mankind”.

    Instead, the radioactive fallout left a deep and complex legacy — one that is both scientific and profoundly human, with communities displaced for generations.

    The Rainbow Warrior coming into port in Majuro, Marshall Islands. Between March and April 2025 it embarked on a six-week mission around the Pacific nation to elevate calls for nuclear and climate justice; and support independent scientific research into the impacts of decades-long nuclear weapons testing by the US government. Image: © Bianca Vitale/Greenpeace

    Between March and April, we travelled on the Greenpeace flagship vessel, the Rainbow Warrior, throughout the Marshall Islands, including to three northern atolls that bear the most severe scars of Cold War nuclear weapons testing:

    • Enewetak atoll, where, on Runit Island, stands a massive leaking concrete dome beneath which lies plutonium-contaminated waste, a result of a partial “clean-up” of some of the islands after the nuclear tests;
    • Bikini atoll, a place so beautiful, yet rendered uninhabitable by some of the most powerful nuclear detonations ever conducted; and
    • Rongelap atoll, where residents were exposed to radiation fallout and later convinced to return to contaminated land, part of what is now known as Project 4.1, a US medical experiment to test humans’  exposure to radiation.

    This isn’t fiction, nor the distant past. It’s a chapter of history still alive through the environment, the health of communities, and the data we’re collecting today.

    Each location we visit, each sample we take, adds to a clearer picture of some of the long-term impacts of nuclear testing—and highlights the importance of continuing to document, investigate, and attempt to understand and share these findings.

    These are our field notes from a journey through places that hold important lessons for science, justice, and global accountability.

    As part of the Marshall Islands ship tour, a group of Greenpeace scientists and independent radiation experts were in Rongelap to sample lagoon sediments and plants that could become food if people came back. Image: © Greenpeace/Chewy C. Lin

    Our mission: why are we here?
    With the permission and support of the Marshallese government, a group of Greenpeace science and radiation experts, together with independent scientists, are in the island nation to assess, investigate, and document the long-term environmental and radiological consequences of nuclear weapons testing in the Marshall Islands.

    Our mission is grounded in science. We’re conducting field sampling and radiological surveys to gather data on what radioactivity remains in the environment — isotopes such as caesium-137, strontium-90 and plutonium-239/240. These substances are released during nuclear explosions and can linger in the environment for decades, posing serious health risks, such as increased risk of cancers in organs and bones.

    But this work is not only about radiation measurements, it is also about bearing witness.

    We are here in solidarity with Marshallese communities who continue to live with the consequences of decisions made decades ago, without their consent and far from the public eye.

    Stop 1: Enewetak Atoll — the dome that shouldn’t exist

    The Runit Dome with the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior in the background. Image: © Greenpeace/Chewy C. Lin

    At the far western edge of the Marshall Islands is Enewetak. The name might not ring a bell for many, but this atoll was the site of 43 US nuclear detonations. Today, it houses what may be one of the most radioactive places in the world — the Runit Dome.

    Once a tropical paradise thick with coconut palms, Runit Island is capped by a massive concrete structure the size of a football field. Under this dome — cracked, weather-worn, and only 46 centimetres thick in some places — lies 85,000 cubic metres of radioactive waste. These substances are not only confined to the crater — they are also found across the island’s soil, rendering Runit Island uninhabitable for all time.

    The contrast between what it once was and what it has become is staggering. We took samples near the dome’s base, where rising sea levels now routinely flood the area.

    We collected coconut from the island, which will be processed and prepared in the Rainbow Warrior’s onboard laboratory. Crops such as coconut are a known vector for radioactive isotope transfer, and tracking levels in food sources is essential for understanding long-term environmental and health risks.

    The local consequences of this simple fact are deeply unjust. While some atolls in the Marshall Islands can harvest and sell coconut products, the people of Enewetak are prohibited from doing so because of radioactive contamination.

    They have lost not only their land and safety but also their ability to sustain themselves economically. The radioactive legacy has robbed them of income and opportunity.

    Measuring and collecting coconut samples. Image: © Greenpeace/Chewy C. Lin

    One of the most alarming details about this dome is that there is no lining beneath the structure — it is in direct contact with the environment, while containing some of the most hazardous long-lived substances ever to exist on planet Earth. It was never built to withstand flooding, sea level rise, and climate change.

    The scientific questions are urgent: how much of this material is already leaking into the lagoon? What are the exposure risks to marine ecosystems and local communities?

    We are here to help answer questions with new, independent data, but still, being in the craters and walking on this ground where nuclear Armageddon was unleashed is an emotional and surreal journey.

    Stop 2: Bikini — a nuclear catastrophe, labelled ‘for the good of mankind’

    Aerial shot of Bikini atoll, Marshall Islands. The Greenpeace ship, Rainbow Warrior can be seen in the upper left. Image: © Greenpeace/Chewy C. Lin

    Unlike Chernobyl or Fukushima, where communities were devastated by catastrophic accidents, Bikini tells a different story. This was not an accident.

    The nuclear destruction of Bikini was deliberate, calculated, and executed with full knowledge that entire ways of life were going to be destroyed.

    Bikini Atoll is incredibly beautiful and would look idyllic on any postcard. But we know what lies beneath: the site of 23 nuclear detonations, including Castle Bravo, the largest ever nuclear weapons test conducted by the United States.

    Castle Bravo alone released more than 1000 times the explosive yield of the Hiroshima bomb. The radioactive fallout massively contaminated nearby islands and their populations, together with thousands of US military personnel.

    Bikini’s former residents were forcibly relocated in 1946 before nuclear testing began, with promises of a safe return. But the atoll is still uninhabited, and most of the new generations of Bikinians have never seen their home island.

    As we stood deep in the forest next to a massive concrete blast bunker, reality hit hard — behind its narrow lead-glass viewing window, US military personnel once watched the evaporation of Bikini lagoon.

    Bikini Islanders board a landing craft vehicle personnel (LCVP) as they depart from Bikini Atoll in March 1946. Image: © United States Navy

    On our visit, we noticed there’s a spectral quality to Bikini. The homes of the Bikini islanders are long gone. In its place now stand a scattering of buildings left by the US Department of Energy: rusting canteens, rotting offices, sleeping quarters with peeling walls, and traces of the scientific experiments conducted here after the bombs fell.

    On dusty desks, we found radiation reports, notes detailing crop trials, and a notebook meticulously tracking the application of potassium to test plots of corn, alfalfa, lime, and native foods like coconut, pandanus, and banana. The potassium was intended to block the uptake of caesium-137, a radioactive isotope, by plant roots.

    The logic was simple: if these crops could be decontaminated, perhaps one day Bikini could be repopulated.

    We collected samples of coconuts and soil — key indicators of internal exposure risk if humans were to return. Bikini raises a stark question: What does “safe” mean, and who gets to decide?

    The US declared parts of Bikini habitable in 1970, only to evacuate people again eight years later after resettled families suffered from radiation exposure. The science is not abstract here. It is personal. It is human. It has real consequences.

    Stop 3: Rongelap — setting for Project 4.1

    The abandoned church on Rongelap atoll. Image: © Greenpeace/Chewy C. Lin

    The Rainbow Warrior arrived at the eastern side of Rongelap atoll, anchoring one mile from the centre of Rongelap Island, the church spire and roofs of “new” buildings reflecting the bright sun.

    n 1954, fallout from the Castle Bravo nuclear detonation on Bikini blanketed this atoll in radioactive ash — fine, white powder that children played in, thinking it was snow. The US government waited three days to evacuate residents, despite knowing the risks. The US government declared it safe to return to Rongelap in 1957 — but it was a severely contaminated environment. The very significant radiation exposure to the Rongelap population caused severe health impacts: thyroid cancers, birth defects such as “jellyfish babies”, miscarriages, and much more.

    In 1985, after a request to the US government to evacuate was dismissed, the Rongelap community asked Greenpeace to help relocate them from their ancestral lands. Using the first Rainbow Warrior, and over a period of 10 days and four trips, 350 residents collectively dismantled their homes, bringing everything with them — including livestock, and 100 metric tons of building material — where they resettled on the islands of Mejatto and Ebeye on Kwajalein atoll.

    It is a part of history that lives on in the minds of the Marshallese people we meet in this ship voyage — in the gratitude they still express, the pride in keeping the fight for justice, and in the pain of still not having a permanent, safe home.

    Greenpeace representatives and displaced Rongelap community come together on Mejatto, Marshall Islands to commemorate the 40 years since the Rainbow Warrior evacuated the island’s entire population in May 1985 due to the impacts of US nuclear weapons testing. Image: © Greenpeace/Chewy C. Lin

    Now, once again, we are standing on their island of Rongelap, walking past abandoned buildings and rusting equipment, some of it dating from the 1980s and 1990s — a period when the US Department of Energy launched a push to encourage resettlement declaring that the island was safe — a declaration that this time, the population welcomed with mistrust, not having access to independent scientific data and remembering the deceitful relocation of some decades before.

    Here, once again, we sample soil and fruits that could become food if people came back. It is essential to understand ongoing risks — especially for communities considering whether and how to return.

    This is not the end. It is just the beginning

    The team of Greenpeace scientists and independent radiation experts on Rongelap atoll, Marshall Islands, with the Rainbow Warrior in the background. Shaun Burnie (author of the article) is first on the left. Image: © Greenpeace/Chewy C. Lin

    Our scientific mission is to take measurements, collect samples, and document contamination. But that’s not all we’re bringing back.

    We carry with us the voices of the Marshallese who survived these tests and are still living with their consequences. We carry images of graves swallowed by tides near Runit Dome, stories of entire cultures displaced from their homelands, and measurements of radiation showing contamination still persists after many decades.

    There are 9700 nuclear warheads still held by military powers around the world – mostly in the United States and Russian arsenals. The Marshall Islands was one of the first nations to suffer the consequences of nuclear weapons — and the legacy persists today.

    We didn’t come to speak for the Marshallese. We came to listen, to bear witness, and to support their demand for justice. We plan to return next year, to follow up on our research and to make results available to the people of the Marshall Islands.

    And we will keep telling these stories — until justice is more than just a word.

    Kommol Tata (“thank you” in the beautiful Marshallese language) for following our journey.

    Shaun Burnie is a senior nuclear specialist at Greenpeace Ukraine and was part of the Rainbow Warrior team in the Marshall Islands. This article was first published by Greenpeace Aotearoa and is republished with permission.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI: Best No Credit Payday Loans For Fast Cash and Quick Approval

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Houston, May 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    In This Article, You’ll Discover:

    • Why no-credit payday loans have become essential financial tools in 2025
    • The specific pain points of borrowers who are denied access to traditional lending
    • How fast cash loans with quick approval can bridge the gap in urgent financial situations?
    • A deep dive into how MoneyMutual connects borrowers with trusted lenders in minutes
    • What makes MoneyMutual one of the best options for instant payday loans online
    • Step-by-step guidance on the loan application process, from form submission to fund disbursement
    • Key eligibility requirements and what documents are typically needed
    • A comparison between payday loans and other fast cash solutions
    • Consumer testimonials, reviews, and social proof of effectiveness
    • Financial literacy tips and how to borrow responsibly to avoid debt cycles
    • Important pricing and fee disclaimers, with reminders to check the official website for the most accurate information

    TL;DR – Executive Summary

    In today’s economy, many consumers face urgent financial needs but lack access to traditional loans due to poor or no credit history. This article explores the best no credit payday loans for fast cash and quick approval, offering a comprehensive look at how services like MoneyMutual deliver emergency funding—often with same-day approval and no credit checks required.

    You’ll learn why fast cash loans with no credit check are reshaping short-term borrowing in 2025 and how online payday loans with instant approval work. We break down the benefits of choosing MoneyMutual for quick approvals, outline key eligibility criteria, and guide you through the process step-by-step.

    With embedded financial literacy guidance, comparisons to other loan options, and real user experiences, this long-form article is your complete guide to no credit check payday loans—emphasizing responsible borrowing, transparency, and fast solutions. Pricing information is included with a reminder to verify the latest terms directly on the official MoneyMutual website, as rates and availability may change at any time.

    Introduction: When Bills Can’t Wait

    Life doesn’t always wait for payday. From sudden car repairs to medical bills that can’t be postponed, many Americans find themselves in urgent need of cash, but without the credit score or savings to fall back on. In today’s economy, traditional lending systems are often out of reach for people with low or no credit history. This creates a harsh reality: when emergencies hit, the very people who need money the most are frequently denied access to it.

    That’s where no-credit-payday loans come into play. These financial lifelines provide fast cash with quick approval, even for those with poor credit scores or no credit history at all. They are designed to offer emergency cash loans without the red tape, helping consumers stay afloat during unexpected hardships.

    The Realities of Financial Exclusion

    Not everyone has a family member or friend to borrow from. And even fewer people have the pristine credit needed to qualify for traditional personal loans. Credit cards may already be maxed out, and banks can take days—or even weeks—to process applications. Meanwhile, expenses are piling up.

    As a result, more borrowers are turning to instant payday loans online and same-day payday loans with no credit check to fill the gap. These are typically small, short-term loans offered through online payday loan platforms like MoneyMutual, which serve as a bridge to trusted lenders.

    The Rise of Fintech and Digital Lending

    Thanks to fintech innovations, lenders now have the tools to evaluate borrowers beyond just credit scores. By leveraging secure data analytics and mobile-first applications, platforms like MoneyMutual allow users to apply for loans in just minutes. Many applicants receive instant approvals and may have funds deposited as quickly as the next business day.

    Disclaimer: Payday loans are not long-term financial solutions. If you’re experiencing long-term financial distress, consult a certified financial advisor or local support agency.

    Understanding the Reader’s Pain Points

    The stress of unpaid bills, eviction notices, or emergency medical procedures is overwhelming. When every hour counts, navigating complex loan forms and waiting on credit approvals can feel like torture. That’s why understanding options like quick approval payday loans and no credit check loans online is essential.

    This article will walk you through everything you need to know about finding the best no-credit payday loans for fast cash and quick approval in 2025. From how the process works to why MoneyMutual stands out among other payday loan providers, you’ll gain the clarity needed to make an informed and confident decision.

    The Financial Struggles No One Talks About

    Financial emergencies often come without warning—a broken furnace in the winter, a car that won’t start before work, or a medical bill that’s due immediately. For many Americans, these events trigger not just anxiety but a frantic search for funding that won’t penalize them for past mistakes or the absence of a formal credit history.

    While traditional lenders maintain rigid standards around creditworthiness, millions of people today are shut out from accessing even small amounts of emergency credit. The truth is, having poor or no credit can feel like being locked out of the financial system entirely.

    The Realities of Credit Inequality

    Credit scores were designed to measure risk, but over time, they’ve come to determine far more—access to housing, employment opportunities, and personal dignity. Many hardworking individuals fall through the cracks because of past financial hardship, medical expenses, or simply a lack of credit activity. The result is a population that is financially vulnerable and underserved.

    This is where no-credit-payday loans make a meaningful difference. These short-term financial tools allow borrowers to gain fast access to emergency cash without undergoing traditional credit checks. Unlike conventional banks that rely on legacy systems, payday lenders working through modern digital platforms assess a borrower’s ability to repay based on real-time income and job status.

    Disclaimer: Payday loans are not long-term financial planning tools. Always consider alternatives and speak with a financial advisor for ongoing financial issues.

    Emergency Cash Loans: Why They Matter Now More Than Ever

    In 2025, more than half of Americans report living paycheck to paycheck. Inflation, unpredictable job markets, and the rising cost of living all contribute to mounting financial pressure. When faced with a crisis, those without access to mainstream credit are left to choose between late fees, overdraft charges, or worse—missing a rent payment or losing access to utilities.

    Emergency cash loans with no credit check are designed for these exact moments. They provide near-immediate funding to cover essential costs, buying borrowers the time they need to regain financial control. When sourced from trusted platforms like MoneyMutual, these loans can be both fast and reliable.

    The Emotional Weight of Financial Insecurity

    The numbers don’t tell the whole story. Financial distress often triggers emotional strain, including anxiety, sleeplessness, and feelings of hopelessness. While this article does not provide medical advice, it’s important to recognize that financial stress can negatively impact physical and mental well-being. Anyone feeling overwhelmed should consider seeking guidance from a licensed counselor or community health resource.

    In this context, the speed and simplicity of payday loans for bad credit, especially those offered by fintech payday loan platforms, can provide relief not just financially, but emotionally. The sense of agency restored by quick funding and clear terms can be a critical part of navigating difficult life circumstances.

    The Limitations of Traditional Lending

    Mainstream financial institutions are built to serve the already-privileged: salaried workers with extensive credit histories, collateral, and high credit scores. For everyone else—gig workers, self-employed individuals, or those recovering from financial hardship—traditional options may be unrealistic.

    Loans from brick-and-mortar banks can take days or weeks to process. By the time you’re approved (if you’re approved at all), the emergency has worsened. By contrast, online payday loans with instant approval aim to fund within 24 hours. Many borrowers complete a secure online application in minutes and receive offers in real time.

    Note: Approval timeframes and loan amounts vary by lender. Loan decisions are made solely at the lender’s discretion.

    Digital Lending and Financial Inclusion

    Today’s digital lending platforms are designed to be mobile-first, accessible, and transparent. They bring the power of financial inclusion to people who might otherwise be ignored by the traditional system. These platforms assess borrower profiles using alternative data such as income frequency, employment status, and bank account activity rather than outdated credit metrics alone.

    By expanding eligibility and improving access, services like MoneyMutual help democratize finance, providing access to fast cash loans with no credit check for people who need immediate relief.

    Need emergency cash now? Apply with MoneyMutual in minutes—no credit check, no fees, just fast access to funds. Start your free request today!

    Why Money Mutual Stands Out in 2025

    Among the many options available for short-term lending, MoneyMutual continues to stand out as one of the most trusted platforms for connecting borrowers with fast cash loans, especially those with no or poor credit. In a landscape cluttered with questionable lenders and opaque terms, MoneyMutual provides something increasingly rare: a transparent, secure, and user-first approach to short-term borrowing.

    With over 2 million users and a streamlined application process that takes just minutes, MoneyMutual is widely considered one of the best no-credit payday loan options for Americans seeking quick approval and instant online access to cash.

    A Brief Look at Who They Are

    MoneyMutual is not a direct lender. Instead, it operates as a lending marketplace, matching borrowers with a vetted network of more than 60 short-term lenders. This network ensures that applicants have access to multiple offers that fit their specific needs and financial circumstances, without wasting time applying individually to dozens of companies.

    This model enhances borrower choice, boosts competition among lenders, and often results in more favorable terms and faster funding.

    The Key Features That Define MoneyMutual

    Fast Application Process

    The loan request form on MoneyMutual’s platform can be completed in less than five minutes. Unlike traditional lenders, there are no lengthy credit applications or invasive documentation required. This mobile-first payday loan application system was designed with convenience and speed in mind.

    Once submitted, the request is automatically matched with lenders. Borrowers typically begin receiving offers within minutes.

    No Credit Checks Required

    MoneyMutual specializes in connecting applicants with no credit check payday loans. Instead of evaluating traditional credit reports, lenders on the platform assess other risk factors like income level, employment status, and recent banking activity.

    This approach opens the door for individuals who may have been rejected elsewhere due to low FICO scores, thin credit files, or past financial mistakes.

    Same-Day Approval Potential

    While funding timeframes vary, many lenders in the MoneyMutual network offer online payday loans with instant approval. Qualified applicants can sometimes receive funds as soon as the next business day. This makes it one of the leading platforms for same-day payday loans with no credit check—a critical need for those facing financial emergencies.

    Note: The Timing of approval and funding is determined by the individual lender, and not guaranteed by MoneyMutual.

    Wide Range of Loan Amounts

    Depending on the lender match, borrowers may be eligible to request loan amounts ranging from $200 to $5,000. This range is broader than what many other payday platforms offer, giving consumers flexibility whether they’re covering a small utility bill or an urgent medical expense.

    Disclaimer: This article does not offer medical advice. If you’re dealing with a medical emergency, seek professional care. Payday loans are not a substitute for health insurance or financial planning.

    Security and Data Privacy

    All data transmitted through MoneyMutual’s site is encrypted and securely processed. The company states clearly that it does not sell or misuse user information. This level of digital lending security is essential in 2025, as concerns about data breaches and identity theft continue to rise.

    The company uses SSL encryption and works only with lenders who adhere to industry-standard privacy and data protection protocols.

    Facing a financial crunch? Get matched with payday lenders today through MoneyMutual—no credit required, fast approval, secure process. Apply now!

    How It Works — A Step-by-Step Overview

    1. Complete the Secure Loan Request Form: Enter basic information such as name, address, employment details, and monthly income. The form is mobile-optimized for speed and ease.
    2. Get Matched With a Lender: Within seconds, MoneyMutual runs your profile against its network of over 60 trusted lenders.
    3. Review Your Offer(s): If matched, you’ll be redirected to the lender’s site to review their terms. This may include the loan amount, repayment schedule, and fees.
    4. Accept and Receive Funds: If you accept an offer, the lender may deposit funds directly into your account, sometimes as soon as the next business day.
    5. Repay Based on Agreement: Repayment terms vary by lender, and most operate with automatic debit options. Always read the fine print and understand any rollover penalties or interest caps.

    Disclaimer: The loan terms, including interest rates, fees, and repayment schedules, are set by each lender individually. MoneyMutual does not influence or guarantee specific terms.

    Eligibility Criteria

    To apply through MoneyMutual, you must meet the following minimum qualifications:

    • Be at least 18 years of age
    • Be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident
    • Have a minimum monthly income of $800
    • Possess an active checking account
    • Have a valid email address and a working phone number

    These baseline requirements are standard among direct lender payday loans and ensure that borrowers are equipped to manage short-term repayment.

    Why Borrowers Choose MoneyMutual

    • Speed: Applications take minutes, and offers are returned almost instantly
    • Access: No credit checks allow more people to qualify
    • Options: A network of lenders means multiple loan offers, not just one
    • Security: The platform is encrypted and follows modern compliance practices
    • Transparency: There are no hidden fees to submit a loan request through the platform

    Not a One-Size-Fits-All Solution

    It’s important to understand that while MoneyMutual offers quick approval payday loans, they are still a form of short-term borrowing. Interest rates may be high, and rollovers can lead to long-term debt if not managed properly. The service is designed for urgent, short-term needs, not ongoing financial support.

    Disclaimer: Payday loans should not be used as a long-term solution to recurring financial challenges. Consult a certified financial advisor for personalized assistance.

    Don’t let bad credit stop you. Find same-day payday loans with MoneyMutual’s trusted lenders—apply now and get funded as soon as tomorrow!

    A Step-by-Step Guide to Applying Through MoneyMutual

    Applying for a payday loan can often feel like navigating a maze, especially when you’re under pressure. But with MoneyMutual, the process is designed to be fast, transparent, and accessible from any device. Whether you’re on your phone during your lunch break or using a laptop at home, the mobile-first payday loan application experience is built for ease.

    Here’s a breakdown of how online payday loans with instant approval work through MoneyMutual’s trusted lending marketplace.

    Step 1: Complete the Secure Loan Request Form

    Start by visiting the MoneyMutual website and accessing their loan request form. The form asks for basic personal and financial information, such as:

    • Your full name and contact information
    • Employment status and monthly income
    • Bank account routing and checking account details
    • How much money do you need (typically between $200 and $5,000)

    This form takes less than five minutes to fill out and is fully encrypted to protect your personal data. You won’t be asked for a credit score—this is a no credit check payday loan platform, so your FICO score won’t be the barrier it often is with traditional loans.

    Note: While MoneyMutual does not run a credit check, some partner lenders may perform alternative assessments to verify income or banking history.

    Step 2: Automated Matching With Lenders

    Once you submit your information, MoneyMutual instantly processes your request and scans its network of over 60 payday lenders. These lenders compete to offer fast cash loans with no credit check, which increases the odds of approval and allows you to receive multiple offers.

    You’ll be redirected to a lender’s site if a match is made. Here, you can review the quick approval payday loan terms directly, including:

    • Loan amount
    • Repayment schedule
    • Associated fees or interest rates
    • Fine print and rollover policies

    Step 3: Review, Accept, and Sign the Loan Agreement

    Once redirected, you’ll have the chance to read through the offer details provided by the lender. This step is critical—take your time to evaluate whether the loan amount and repayment terms fit your current budget.

    If you agree to the terms, you can sign the contract electronically. After signing, the lender will begin processing your funding.

    Disclaimer: The APR and repayment terms will vary by lender. Be sure to read all terms carefully before accepting any agreement. MoneyMutual does not guarantee approval, and all final lending decisions are made by individual lenders.

    Step 4: Receive Your Funds (Usually by the Next Business Day)

    Most approved borrowers receive funds within one business day. Some lenders even offer same-day payday loans with no credit check, depending on your bank and the time of approval.

    Your money will be deposited directly into the checking account you provided during the application process. This fast, direct deposit setup is one of the key reasons why MoneyMutual is preferred by those needing emergency cash loans quickly.

    Note: While most funds are deposited within 24 hours, actual timing will depend on the lender and your bank’s processing policies.

    Step 5: Repayment as Agreed

    Repayment is typically structured around your next payday, though terms vary. Most lenders offer automatic withdrawals from your checking account on the agreed-upon date, helping reduce the risk of missed payments.

    Many payday loan lenders also allow early repayment without penalty—something worth considering if your financial situation improves quickly.

    What You Need to Apply

    To qualify for a loan through MoneyMutual, you must meet these minimum eligibility criteria:

    • Be 18 years of age or older
    • Be a U.S. citizen or legal resident
    • Have a verifiable monthly income of at least $800
    • Own an active checking account
    • Provide a working phone number and a valid email address

    These basic requirements are significantly more accessible than traditional bank loan prerequisites, making MoneyMutual one of the more inclusive options for payday loans for bad credit.

    Application Best Practices

    Before you apply, keep the following tips in mind to help ensure a smooth experience:

    • Double-check your bank account and income information for accuracy
    • Make sure your phone and email are active—you’ll need to confirm lender communication quickly
    • Only request what you need—borrowing more can increase financial strain and repayment challenges

    Disclaimer: Borrow responsibly. Payday loans are intended for short-term use. Relying on them as a recurring solution may result in long-term debt. Seek alternative resources if financial hardship is ongoing.

    Bills piling up? Apply for a no credit payday loan in 5 minutes with MoneyMutual—get quick offers from real lenders without any pressure. Start now!

    Real Stories: How MoneyMutual Has Helped Everyday Borrowers

    In the world of short-term lending, reputation matters. While many platforms make big promises, very few deliver on them consistently. What sets MoneyMutual apart isn’t just the speed or convenience—it’s the real-life impact experienced by borrowers across the country. From parents covering emergency bills to gig workers facing income gaps, the platform has served as a trusted online lending marketplace for those who need help fast.

    Fast, Reliable, and Stress-Free

    Many customers highlight how MoneyMutual’s no-credit payday loans offered a stress-free alternative when traditional banks wouldn’t even consider their application. With online payday loans and instant approval, users say they were able to apply during a lunch break and see real offers before the end of the day.

    “I was nervous at first, but the process was quick and easy. I had funds in my account the next day and didn’t have to worry about my credit score.” — Jennifer H., California.

    These testimonials emphasize the platform’s fast cash loans with no credit check, giving people access to funds without weeks of waiting or the frustration of being declined for outdated reasons.

    Serving Those Often Ignored

    Another recurring theme among user experiences is that MoneyMutual delivers for people with bad credit or no credit at all—a population that’s often left out of traditional financial systems.

    “I’d been denied everywhere because of a few bad years. MoneyMutual got me matched with a lender who helped me pay my utility bill and avoid shutoff.” — David R., Georgia.

    The ability to receive same-day payday loans with no credit check has made a meaningful difference in the lives of users who needed a fast solution in critical situations.

    Transparent and Secure

    Many reviewers also praise the transparency and ease of the process. The ability to compare offers from multiple lenders within a secure environment makes borrowers feel informed and in control.

    “I didn’t feel pressured. Everything was laid out clearly, and I was able to pick the lender that worked best for my needs.” — Linda M., Michigan.

    These positive experiences reflect how MoneyMutual has positioned itself as a top choice for payday loans for bad credit in 2025.

    Disclaimer: Individual experiences may vary. All loans are subject to lender approval, and terms will differ by offer. Always review the full agreement before accepting any loan.

    How MoneyMutual Compares to Other Fast Cash Options

    When time is short and financial stress is high, choosing the right loan provider matters more than ever. While many options exist for fast cash, few deliver the balance of accessibility, speed, and security that MoneyMutual offers. Here’s how it compares to traditional banks, peer-to-peer lending platforms, and other payday loan providers in 2025.

    Traditional Banks and Credit Unions

    For borrowers with strong credit, traditional banks and credit unions offer some of the lowest interest rates and long-term repayment options. However, they require a detailed credit history, documented employment, and extensive paperwork. Loan approvals typically take days or even weeks—making them impractical for emergency needs. They also tend to limit or deny access for those with poor credit, which eliminates many of the individuals who need help the most.

    MoneyMutual, by contrast, focuses on fast cash loans with no credit check, allowing people who are financially underserved to find relief without the long wait.

    Peer-to-Peer Lending Platforms

    Platforms like LendingClub and Prosper allow borrowers to apply for loans that are funded by individual investors instead of banks. While these options are more flexible than traditional loans, they still often require a soft or hard credit check and can take multiple days to process. They also lack the immediacy and urgency that same-day payday loans with no credit check provide.

    In urgent situations, the speed and simplicity of online payday loans with instant approval, like those found through MoneyMutual, better serve borrowers who can’t afford to wait.

    Single Payday Loan Providers

    Many online payday loan sites function as single-lender operations, meaning they offer just one loan product with no comparison to others. These websites often have limited transparency, vague terms, and minimal support. The borrower has no real ability to compare lenders or negotiate better offers. Security can also be an issue, as some sites lack strong encryption or consumer protection policies.

    In contrast, MoneyMutual operates as a trusted online lending marketplace, giving borrowers access to a broad network of over 60 lenders. This competition drives faster approvals and potentially more favorable loan terms.

    Why MoneyMutual Leads in 2025

    MoneyMutual sets itself apart by offering a unique combination of features that are especially valuable in today’s economic climate:

    • No credit check required – Unlike banks or P2P platforms, you can apply without worrying about your FICO score.
    • Instant matching – Once you submit the online form, you’re matched in real-time with multiple lenders, increasing your chances of approval.
    • Speed of funding – Many borrowers receive funds within 24 hours, depending on their lender and bank.
    • Transparent process – There are no upfront fees to apply, and the application takes just a few minutes to complete on any device.
    • Secure and encrypted – Your information is protected using industry-standard encryption throughout the process.
    • Inclusive requirements – You only need to be 18+, a U.S. resident, have a $800+ monthly income, and an active checking account to apply.

    For anyone seeking the best no-credit payday loans, MoneyMutual offers a streamlined solution that balances speed with trust and accessibility.

    Disclaimer: Individual lenders set their own loan terms, rates, and fees. MoneyMutual is not a lender and does not guarantee loan approval. Borrowers are encouraged to review all loan details thoroughly before accepting any offer.

    Denied by banks? MoneyMutual connects you to payday loans with no credit check and fast deposits. Apply free now and see your options instantly!

    Financial Literacy Is Your Best Defense

    While no credit payday loans can provide much-needed relief in urgent financial situations, they are not meant to be used as a long-term solution. Understanding the risks, benefits, and strategies for responsible borrowing is just as critical as finding the right lender. That’s why this section focuses on promoting financial literacy—an essential skill set for navigating short-term loans wisely.

    What Are Payday Loans Really For?

    Payday loans for bad credit are designed to help cover short-term gaps in income, such as emergency bills, rent, or utilities—until your next paycheck. They can be incredibly helpful when used as intended. However, borrowing without a clear repayment plan or using payday loans repeatedly can lead to a cycle of debt that becomes difficult to escape.

    MoneyMutual connects users to lenders who offer transparency and fast cash loans with no credit check, but it’s still up to the borrower to use these tools wisely. These loans are a temporary bridge, not a permanent crutch.

    Disclaimer: Payday loans are not a form of long-term credit. If you’re consistently relying on payday lending to manage ongoing expenses, consult a certified credit counselor or nonprofit financial assistance organization.

    Borrowing Responsibly: Practical Tips

    Here are key principles to follow when considering direct lender payday loans or using services like MoneyMutual:

    1. Borrow Only What You Need: It’s tempting to accept the maximum loan offer, but always borrow based on your ability to repay, not on what’s available. Requesting more than necessary can increase repayment pressure and the interest owed.
    2. Understand the Full Cost: Before agreeing to any loan, make sure you understand the total amount you’ll repay—including fees, APR, and any penalties for late or missed payments. If anything seems unclear, ask the lender for clarification before signing.
    3. Avoid Loan Rollovers: Some lenders offer rollovers—extending your loan by paying a fee—but these can compound quickly, leading to escalating debt. Try to repay your loan on the original due date whenever possible.
    4. Check the Lender’s Credentials: If you’re matched with a lender through MoneyMutual’s trusted online lending marketplace, you can feel more secure knowing that the platform only works with verified, compliant partners. Still, you should always read the lender’s privacy policy, contact information, and loan disclosures.
    5. Create a Repayment Plan: Set calendar reminders and review your budget to ensure you’re prepared to repay the loan on time. Missing payments can lead to additional fees, overdrafts, and credit implications—even if your initial approval didn’t require a credit check.
    6. Consider Alternatives When Appropriate: Before applying, explore other resources such as borrowing from a credit union, negotiating payment extensions with service providers, or tapping into community assistance programs. These options may offer more flexibility or lower costs, depending on your circumstances.

    Building Better Habits Post-Borrowing

    After resolving your immediate financial need with a fast cash loan, take steps to improve your long-term stability. Start by tracking expenses, setting aside savings where possible, and using tools or apps that support financial planning. Increasing your financial literacy empowers you to avoid repeat borrowing and establish more durable financial independence.

    Platforms like MoneyMutual offer crucial access to online payday loans with instant approval, but they work best when borrowers use them with a long-term strategy in mind. Remember, these loans are one part of a broader financial toolkit, not a standalone solution.

    Disclaimer: Always compare multiple loan options and seek third-party advice if you’re unsure about repayment terms. Responsible borrowing ensures that fast access to cash today doesn’t become a larger problem tomorrow.

    When cash can’t wait, MoneyMutual delivers. Apply now for fast payday loans—no credit check, no hidden fees, just real offers in minutes!

    Understanding the Costs of No Credit Payday Loans

    One of the most important aspects of using no-credit payday loans responsibly is having a clear understanding of the costs involved. Although platforms like Money Mutual offer access to fast cash loans with no credit check, the fees and interest rates can vary significantly depending on the lender you’re matched with.

    Because MoneyMutual is a trusted online lending marketplace, not a direct lender, it doesn’t control the terms of the loans offered through its platform. Instead, it connects you with reputable lenders who disclose all pricing details upfront. Still, it’s your responsibility to carefully review and understand all terms before accepting any loan agreement.

    Typical Fees and Interest Rates

    The total cost of your payday loan depends on the lender’s terms, your loan amount, the duration of the loan, and your state of residence (since payday lending regulations vary by state). Here are some general fee guidelines:

    • APR ranges for payday loans can be high—sometimes between 200% and 700% on an annualized basis. However, payday loans are usually short-term (often two weeks), so the total dollar cost may be smaller than it sounds annually.
    • Flat fees may also apply, such as $10 to $30 per $100 borrowed, depending on the lender and your state regulations.
    • Late fees or rollover charges can occur if you’re unable to repay the loan on time. Some lenders allow rollovers for an additional fee, which can quickly increase your total repayment amount.

    Disclaimer: These figures are general estimates. Individual lenders determine actual fees, rates, and repayment schedules. Always read the full loan disclosure and consult the lender’s terms before proceeding.

    No Fees to Use the Platform

    It’s free to submit a loan request through MoneyMutual. You won’t be charged to apply, review lender offers, or decline a loan. The platform earns from lenders—not borrowers—which adds a layer of transparency for users seeking payday loans for bad credit without being penalized up front.

    Always Compare Terms

    When you’re matched with a lender, take time to compare offers and confirm:

    • The total amount you’ll owe
    • Payment due date
    • Whether early repayment is allowed without penalty
    • What happens in case of late payment or insufficient funds

    Disclaimer: Pricing is determined solely by individual lenders and may change without notice. Always check the official website or lender’s terms directly for the most up-to-date pricing information before making a decision.

    Urgent expense? No credit? No problem. MoneyMutual connects you to lenders fast with zero cost to apply. Get started now and breathe easier!

    Who Stands Behind Money Mutual?

    In the world of short-term lending, trust is everything. With thousands of loan sites claiming to offer fast cash with no credit check, it’s critical to understand who you’re dealing with and what kind of support is available if something goes wrong.

    MoneyMutual has been operating for over a decade and is widely recognized as a trusted online lending marketplace. Its reputation is built not only on the volume of satisfied users—over two million Americans have used the platform—but also on its commitment to transparency, security, and customer care.

    While MoneyMutual is not a lender itself, it plays a critical role in connecting users with payday loans for bad credit and online payday loans with instant approval, all while maintaining a secure and compliant process.

    Support Availability

    MoneyMutual provides basic customer support through its official website, typically via an online contact form or email. While they do not offer live phone support for loan inquiries (since the actual loans are handled by individual lenders), they do respond to platform-related questions and technical issues.

    If you encounter a problem with a specific lender you’re matched with—such as a dispute over loan terms, repayment timing, or disbursement—you should reach out directly to that lender using the contact information provided in your loan agreement.

    Business Integrity and Consumer Confidence

    MoneyMutual clearly states that it does not guarantee approval and does not influence the lender’s decision-making process. This transparency is one reason why it’s viewed as a credible and secure choice for people seeking no credit payday loans through a centralized and secure platform.

    If you’re ever unsure about the legitimacy of a lender or the safety of your information, you can rest easier knowing that MoneyMutual’s site is encrypted and operates with compliance standards aimed at protecting users.

    What You Should Know About Refunds and Loan Terms

    Because MoneyMutual is not a lender, but rather a trusted online lending marketplace, the company does not issue loans, charge borrowers fees to use its platform, or collect repayment on behalf of any lender. As a result, it does not offer refunds or warranties—those are entirely at the discretion of the individual lender you choose to work with.

    Understanding this distinction is important when considering no credit payday loans. While MoneyMutual provides a secure path to explore offers, all loan terms—including refund policies, cancellation rights, and repayment schedules—are governed by the lender whose offer you accept.

    Refund Policies Are Lender-Specific

    Some lenders may offer short grace periods or allow you to cancel the loan before disbursement, but this is not guaranteed. Once a loan is approved and funded, it typically enters into a binding agreement. Borrowers must refer to their loan contract to understand refund rights, fees, penalties, and the process for disputing charges or reporting repayment issues.

    No Platform Warranty or Guarantees

    MoneyMutual does not guarantee that every applicant will receive a loan offer. Nor does it promise favorable terms, minimum fees, or loan approval timeframes. Its role is to facilitate the introduction between borrower and lender based on your submitted information.

    Borrowers are encouraged to take time reviewing all offers to ensure that the terms align with their financial needs and repayment ability. This is especially important when seeking payday loans for bad credit, where interest rates and fees can vary significantly between lenders.

    Final Thoughts: Reclaiming Control With the Right Lending Option

    Financial emergencies are stressful enough. The added barrier of poor or no credit history can make urgent needs feel impossible to meet. That’s why the availability of no credit payday loans—especially those facilitated by platforms like MoneyMutual—is so important in 2025. They offer a fast, flexible option for individuals who are often overlooked by traditional lenders, without requiring perfect credit scores or lengthy approval processes.

    With just a few minutes and a mobile device, borrowers can access a trusted online lending marketplace that connects them to more than 60 lenders offering fast cash loans with no credit check. Whether you need to cover a utility bill, rent payment, or emergency expense, online payday loans with instant approval provide a financial safety net at a time when speed matters most.

    Making Informed, Responsible Choices

    While services like MoneyMutual are powerful tools for bridging short-term gaps, they are not long-term solutions. Borrowers are encouraged to read all terms carefully, understand their repayment responsibilities, and use these loans for immediate needs—not for recurring expenses.

    The real power in the best no credit payday loans is the sense of control they can restore in the middle of a financial crisis. Used wisely, they can help prevent service disconnections, avoid costly late fees, and protect your livelihood from temporary disruptions.

    One Final Note on Pricing

    Loan terms, fees, and interest rates vary by lender. While MoneyMutual does not charge borrowers to use its platform, each individual lender sets their own pricing structure. Offers should be reviewed in full prior to acceptance.

    Disclaimer: Always verify current pricing and repayment terms directly with the lender. Pricing is subject to change at any time. Visit the official MoneyMutual website or the lender’s portal for the most up-to-date information.

    Need funds now with bad credit? Submit your payday loan request with MoneyMutual—secure, quick, and free to use. Get matched today!

    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

    What are no credit payday loans?

    No credit payday loans are short-term loans designed for individuals who need fast access to cash but have poor or no credit history. Unlike traditional bank loans, these loans typically do not require a hard credit check, making them more accessible to a wider range of borrowers. They’re most often used for emergency expenses and repaid by the borrower’s next payday.

    How fast can I get approved for a payday loan online?

    Many online payday loans offer instant approval, meaning you may receive a decision within minutes of submitting your application. If approved, funds are typically deposited into your bank account by the next business day, depending on the lender and your bank’s processing times.

    Can I get a payday loan with bad credit?

    Yes, payday loans for bad credit are specifically designed for borrowers who have low or no credit scores. Lenders in platforms like MoneyMutual’s trusted online lending marketplace often base approval on income and employment history instead of traditional credit reports.

    Is it safe to apply for a no credit payday loan online?

    When using a trusted online lending marketplace like MoneyMutual, your information is encrypted and securely transmitted to reputable lenders. Be sure to apply only through verified platforms with a strong reputation and clear privacy policies to protect your personal and financial data.

    How much can I borrow with a payday loan?

    Loan amounts typically range from $200 to $5,000 depending on the lender, your income, and state regulations. Always borrow only what you need and can comfortably repay on time to avoid excessive fees.

    Do payday loans have fees or high interest rates?

    Yes, most no credit payday loans have higher interest rates than traditional loans. Lenders may charge flat fees per $100 borrowed or APRs ranging from 200% to 700%. Make sure to review all terms before accepting any loan offer.

    Disclaimer: Loan fees and APRs vary by lender and state. Always check the lender’s terms and verify current rates on the official website. Pricing is subject to change at any time.

    Can I get a same-day payday loan?

    Some lenders offer same-day payday loans with no credit check, but funding timelines depend on the time you apply and your bank’s policies. Most loans are funded within 24 hours if approved during business hours.

    What are the requirements to apply for a payday loan through MoneyMutual?

    To qualify, you must:

    • Be at least 18 years old
    • Be a U.S. citizen or legal resident
    • Have a minimum monthly income of $800
    • Own an active checking account
    • Provide a working phone number and valid email address

    Will applying for a payday loan affect my credit score?

    Submitting a loan request through MoneyMutual does not impact your credit score. However, if a lender performs a soft or hard inquiry after connecting with you directly, there may be a minor credit impact. Late repayment may also be reported to credit agencies depending on the lender’s policy.

    What if I can’t repay the loan on time?

    Failure to repay on time can result in additional fees, rollover charges, or collections. Some lenders may offer extensions, but it’s important to communicate directly with them. Fast cash loans with no credit check should only be used if you’re confident in your ability to repay by the due date.

    Low on cash before payday? MoneyMutual gives you fast access to trusted payday loan offers—no credit score needed. Apply now in 5 minutes!

    • Company: MoneyMutual
    • Address: 2510 E. Sunset Rd. Ste 6, #85 Las Vegas NV, 89120
    • Email: customerservice@moneymutual.com
    • Phone Support: 844-276-2063

    Disclaimer

    Legal Disclaimer and Affiliate Disclosure

    This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. Readers are strongly encouraged to perform their own research and consult with a licensed financial advisor, credit counselor, or qualified professional before making any financial decisions.

    The content presented herein reflects publicly available information and/or the opinions of the authors and contributors at the time of publication. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the information, no representation or warranty is made, express or implied, regarding the completeness, timeliness, or accuracy of the content. In the event of typographical errors, outdated information, or inconsistencies, neither the authors nor the publishers shall be held liable for any damages or outcomes resulting from the use or misuse of this content.

    Any products, services, companies, or platforms referenced, including third-party loan providers, are subject to change at the discretion of their respective owners or operators. Readers should verify all pricing, terms, conditions, and policies directly with the source. Loan terms, interest rates, and fees are set by individual lenders and may vary by jurisdiction and borrower profile. Approval is not guaranteed. Late or missed payments may result in additional fees or credit consequences depending on the lender’s terms.

    This publication may contain affiliate links. This means that if a reader clicks on a link and applies for or purchases a product or service, the publisher may earn a commission at no additional cost to the reader. Such relationships do not influence the editorial content, which is created independently and objectively to ensure accuracy and transparency.

    Neither the publisher, the authors, the editors, nor any affiliated syndication partners are responsible for any financial losses, liabilities, or adverse consequences arising directly or indirectly from the information provided herein. This article is not endorsed, sponsored, or affiliated with any government agency or regulatory body.

    By reading, sharing, or syndicating this article, all parties acknowledge and accept these terms and waive any claim of liability against the publishers or distribution networks.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Best Bad Credit Lending Provider for Personal Loans with Low Credit Online

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    New York, May 09, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) —

    In This Article, You’ll Discover:

    • The real reasons why individuals with poor credit face repeated loan rejections
    • How bad credit personal loans work and why online lending platforms are reshaping access
    • What makes MoneyMutual the best bad credit lending provider for 2025 borrowers
    • Step-by-step instructions for applying for a personal loan with low credit online
    • Common red flags and how to avoid predatory or risky loan providers
    • The exact features and benefits that set MoneyMutual apart from other platforms
    • Eligibility requirements, typical loan terms, and how fast approvals happen
    • Security, transparency, and the technology behind MoneyMutual’s loan-matching process
    • Key disclaimers about loan terms, interest rates, and always checking official pricing
    • Real-world borrower use cases, customer experiences, and how to get started confidently

    TL;DR Summary:

    For borrowers facing financial challenges and low credit scores, getting approved for a personal loan can feel impossible. This comprehensive guide reviews the best bad credit lending provider for personal loans with low credit online in 2025—MoneyMutual. It outlines the pain points of traditional borrowing, the benefits of FinTech-powered platforms, and the step-by-step process to safely apply for quick, no-obligation loan offers from vetted lenders.

    Readers will gain insight into how MoneyMutual protects personal data, matches users with appropriate lenders, and provides access to emergency cash, without predatory fees or gimmicks. With a clear explanation of eligibility, loan types, approval timelines, and platform features, this article positions MoneyMutual as a trusted marketplace solution for consumers with bad or limited credit histories.

    Introduction

    In today’s fast-paced, digitally-driven world, financial uncertainty can strike anyone, especially those with less-than-perfect credit. Whether you’re facing an unexpected car repair, a sudden medical bill, or simply need help making ends meet until your next paycheck, having poor credit often feels like an inescapable trap. Traditional banks and lenders are quick to turn down applicants with low credit scores, leaving many Americans feeling powerless, overwhelmed, and alone.

    But that’s where online lending platforms are changing the game—and among them, one name consistently rises to the top: MoneyMutual.

    If you’ve been searching for the best bad credit lending provider for personal loans with low credit online, this article is for you. We’ll explore why so many people struggle to get approved, how online platforms like MoneyMutual are creating real opportunities for financial freedom, and why this particular service may be the most trusted, accessible, and secure choice in 2025.

    You’ll walk away understanding:

    • Why your credit score impacts your loan eligibility
    • How personal loans for low credit really work
    • What makes MoneyMutual stand out from other lending providers
    • The risks to avoid when applying online
    • How to safely and effectively use the MoneyMutual platform
    • All the essential business details: pricing, terms, repayment, and customer support

    This guide was created to empower people with poor credit to make informed, safe borrowing decisions—without pressure, confusion, or risk.

    Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not provide financial or legal advice. Always consult a licensed financial advisor before making borrowing decisions. Terms and loan offers vary by lender. MoneyMutual is a free platform and does not issue loans directly.

    The Bad Credit Borrower’s Dilemma: Why People Struggle to Get Approved

    For millions of Americans, having a low credit score isn’t just a number—it’s a daily obstacle. Whether you’ve experienced a job loss, struggled with medical bills, or simply missed a few payments during hard times, bad credit can feel like an invisible fence, constantly limiting your financial freedom.

    What Is Considered Bad Credit?

    In the eyes of most traditional lenders, a credit score below 580 is generally classified as poor. That number alone can disqualify you from most conventional personal loans or credit lines. The credit scoring model, developed by agencies like FICO and VantageScore, takes into account payment history, credit utilization, account age, and other financial behaviors. Unfortunately, even a few mistakes can trigger long-lasting effects.

    Common Reasons for Low Credit Scores

    Many people with low credit are not irresponsible—they’re simply dealing with difficult circumstances. Some of the most common triggers include:

    • Job loss or inconsistent income
    • Emergency medical expenses
    • Divorce or major life changes
    • Lack of access to financial education
    • Early misuse of credit cards or loans
    • Co-signing on someone else’s defaulted loan

    These situations often spiral. Once you miss a payment, fees and interest snowball. Over time, the damage compounds, and your borrowing power shrinks dramatically.

    How Bad Credit Impacts Borrowing Power

    Even if you find a lender willing to consider your application, the odds are stacked against you. You’ll likely face:

    • Higher interest rates
    • Lower loan amounts
    • Shorter repayment terms
    • Stricter income and employment requirements
    • Collateral demands, even for small loans

    This creates a frustrating loop: you need a loan to get back on your feet, but you can’t qualify for one without already being financially secure.

    The Psychological Toll of Loan Rejection

    Beyond financial barriers, the emotional toll of rejection cannot be overstated. Repeated denials lead to stress, shame, and in some cases, complete avoidance of financial planning. This isolation only increases reliance on payday lenders or predatory services—traps that make it harder to rebuild.

    Why Traditional Banks Often Say No

    Most traditional banks use automated systems to filter applications. If your credit report shows delinquencies, collections, or a score below a set threshold, you’re likely to be instantly rejected without further review.

    They may not take into account:

    • Your current income or job stability
    • Your personal story or financial turnaround efforts
    • Your willingness to commit to repayment

    This one-size-fits-all model excludes a large portion of the population—those with financial hardship but genuine repayment potential.

    Enter Online Lending Platforms

    Fortunately, alternative lending platforms have emerged to bridge this gap. These platforms—such as MoneyMutual—are designed with financial inclusion in mind. They consider a broader range of data points, prioritize user-friendly applications, and match borrowers to lenders willing to work with credit-challenged applicants.

    These new solutions are making it possible to find personal loans with low credit online, without the red tape of traditional institutions.

    Need fast cash but have bad credit? Get matched with real lenders in minutes through MoneyMutual—no fees, no pressure. Start your free request today!

    What Makes Personal Loans for Bad Credit Risky – and What to Watch Out For

    For borrowers with low credit scores, the search for emergency funds online can feel like navigating a minefield. While some platforms genuinely aim to help, others are built to exploit desperation. When you’re looking for the best bad credit lending provider for personal loans with low credit online, it’s critical to understand where the dangers lie and how to protect yourself from predatory practices.

    The Rise of Predatory Lending

    Predatory lenders specialize in targeting people with limited financial options. They often advertise “guaranteed approval” or “no credit check loans,” but these offers come with strings attached—like excessively high interest rates, deceptive terms, and aggressive collection tactics.

    These companies rely on borrower vulnerability, offering fast cash but locking users into risky agreements that feature triple-digit APRs, balloon payments, short and rigid repayment terms, and penalty structures that can double or even triple the original debt. A small $500 loan, for example, can spiral into a $2,000 repayment burden in a matter of weeks.

    Disclaimer: If a loan offer sounds too good to be true, especially with bad credit, it likely is. Borrowers should always read the fine print and confirm lender credentials before signing anything.

    Payday Loans vs. Installment Loans: Know the Difference

    A common trap for consumers with low credit is the payday loan, which typically requires full repayment—plus steep fees—by your next paycheck. While these loans may seem like a quick fix, they are notoriously difficult to escape and often lead to multiple rollovers or refinancing cycles.

    Installment loans for bad credit, by comparison, are structured to be repaid in consistent, fixed amounts over a longer timeframe, typically ranging from three months to two years or more. These loans allow borrowers to better plan monthly payments, avoid hidden rollover charges, and gain more financial control.

    In general, payday loans come with extremely high interest rates (sometimes exceeding 300% APR) and very short repayment periods, making them difficult to manage. Installment loans, especially when obtained through trusted platforms like MoneyMutual, often offer significantly lower APRs and much more manageable terms.

    Hidden Fees and Red Flags to Watch For

    Many predatory lenders disguise fees in complex loan agreements or bury important terms in fine print. Here are several warning signs to be aware of:

    • Excessive origination fees that are above industry averages
    • Prepayment penalties that punish you for paying off early
    • Late fees that grow quickly and exponentially
    • Websites with no physical address, verified contact information, or customer service support
    • High-pressure tactics to make you commit quickly, like “limited-time approval” offers

    These practices are designed to trap borrowers into long-term debt, not help them escape it.

    The Importance of Loan Transparency

    Legitimate lending providers should always be upfront about their loan terms, including:

    • The full range of potential APRs
    • Monthly repayment expectations
    • Total cost of the loan
    • The duration and structure of repayment
    • The support resources available for customer questions

    MoneyMutual is a loan marketplace—not a direct lender—and its platform is designed to connect borrowers only with lenders that have been vetted for transparency and reliability. Users are under no obligation to accept any offer, and the service is free to use.

    Disclaimer: MoneyMutual does not guarantee loan approval. All lending terms are determined by the individual lender. It is the borrower’s responsibility to review all conditions carefully before accepting any loan offer.

    How to Spot a Legitimate Lender

    Before entering any personal information on a loan website, take a moment to verify its legitimacy. Make sure the site uses secure HTTPS encryption, clearly lists a privacy policy and terms of service, and offers real customer support through email, phone, or chat. Confirm that loan disclosures are visible before you agree to anything, and ensure the lender is legally licensed to operate in your state.

    Taking these steps helps protect your finances and your personal data.

    Don’t let a low credit score hold you back. Apply now on MoneyMutual and explore personal loan offers without affecting your credit. It’s fast and free!

    Why MoneyMutual Stands Out in 2025

    With countless online lending services vying for attention, it can be difficult to separate legitimate platforms from those that overpromise and underdeliver. Yet, among the many options for borrowers seeking personal loans with low credit online, MoneyMutual continues to emerge as one of the most reliable and accessible solutions available today.

    This section explores why MoneyMutual is widely regarded as the best bad credit lending provider for individuals navigating financial difficulty in 2025—and why its system is built to empower, not exploit, those with low credit scores.

    A Trusted Name With a Proven Track Record

    MoneyMutual has spent over a decade serving as a digital bridge between borrowers and lenders. Originally rising to national visibility through endorsements and educational campaigns, the platform has since become a trusted name in the online lending space, especially for those dealing with credit challenges.

    Rather than offering direct loans, MoneyMutual functions as a loan marketplace. This means that when you submit a request, you’re not applying to just one lender. Instead, you’re being matched with a network of verified lending partners who are willing to work with borrowers who have poor or limited credit histories.

    This approach allows for broader access, more choices, and a higher likelihood of finding a lender that fits your needs, all without damaging your credit score with multiple hard inquiries.

    How the Platform Works

    MoneyMutual’s process is designed to be quick, intuitive, and secure. Here’s how it typically unfolds:

    1. Submit a short form – You provide basic personal and financial details online.
    2. Get matched instantly – The system evaluates your info and matches you with eligible lenders.
    3. Review your offers – You receive potential loan offers in minutes or hours.
    4. Select and proceed – You can review terms in full and finalize your application with the lender directly.

    Importantly, there is no obligation to accept any offer. If you don’t find terms you’re comfortable with, you can walk away with no cost or consequence.

    This system empowers borrowers with control and transparency, qualities often missing from high-risk lending services.

    No Upfront Fees, No Gimmicks

    One of the biggest concerns for people with bad credit is being asked to pay money just to apply. MoneyMutual eliminates that risk completely. The service is 100% free for users. You are never charged an upfront fee to submit your information or to receive loan offers.

    All profits are made by the platform through partnerships with lenders, not by extracting fees from financially vulnerable applicants.

    Disclaimer: While MoneyMutual itself is free to use, individual lenders may include loan origination fees, late payment fees, or other charges. Be sure to carefully read and understand all terms before accepting any offer. Loan conditions and availability are set solely by the lender.

    Fast Approval and Funding Options

    Speed matters when you’re in a financial bind. That’s why many borrowers value MoneyMutual’s fast-turnaround process. Most users receive loan offers within minutes of submitting the application, and funding can often occur within 24 hours of acceptance, depending on the lender’s process and the borrower’s banking institution.

    This level of efficiency is a major advantage for those seeking emergency loans for bad credit or same-day personal loans without traditional red tape.

    User-Friendly and Safe to Use

    MoneyMutual’s website is mobile-friendly, secure, and built with user experience in mind. You don’t need to be tech-savvy to use it. The interface guides you through every step and prioritizes privacy at all times.

    The platform also uses SSL encryption and follows strict data protection protocols to safeguard sensitive information like your Social Security number, employment history, and income.

    Disclaimer: MoneyMutual does not issue loans and cannot guarantee approval or specific rates. All loan terms are determined by participating lenders. Always verify a lender’s full offer before agreeing to any financial obligation.

    A Platform Designed for Financial Inclusion

    Above all, MoneyMutual has positioned itself as a leader in financial inclusion, making the borrowing process more accessible to those who have often been excluded by traditional banks.

    By using technology to connect borrowers with non-traditional lenders willing to consider more than just a credit score, the platform plays a critical role in reshaping how personal loans are issued and who gets access to them.

    For those searching online for the best bad credit lending provider for personal loans with low credit, this combination of speed, trust, security, and choice makes MoneyMutual a clear standout in 2025.

    Struggling with bad credit? MoneyMutual helps you find personal loans online quickly and safely. Take 3 minutes and apply now—your funds could arrive tomorrow

    How to Apply for a Personal Loan Through MoneyMutual

    Applying for a personal loan with bad credit doesn’t have to be complicated, intimidating, or time-consuming. With MoneyMutual, the entire process is streamlined to minimize friction and maximize accessibility, especially for those who’ve been rejected or discouraged by traditional financial institutions.

    This section walks you through the exact steps required to apply through MoneyMutual’s platform, what to expect, and how to get your money fast if you’re approved.

    Step-by-Step: How It Works

    1. Complete the Free Online Form

    Begin by visiting the MoneyMutual website and filling out a secure form with your basic details. You’ll be asked for:

    • Full name and contact information
    • Income source and employment status
    • Monthly income (must meet the minimum, usually $800/month)
    • Banking details (for potential direct deposit)

    The form typically takes about five minutes to complete and does not require a hard credit check at this stage.

    2. Get Matched With Lenders

    Once your information is submitted, the platform’s system goes to work. Using an algorithm that factors in your credit standing, income level, and other criteria, MoneyMutual matches you with lenders in their network that may be able to serve your unique financial profile.

    This network includes companies specializing in personal loans for low credit, installment loans for bad credit, and even emergency loan options for those in urgent need.

    3. Review Loan Offers in Minutes

    In many cases, pre-qualified offers appear within minutes. Each lender will present their terms, including:

    • Loan amount range
    • Estimated APR
    • Monthly repayment schedule
    • Total cost of the loan
    • Fees (if any)

    This is your opportunity to evaluate all your options carefully. You are under no obligation to proceed with any offer.

    Disclaimer: Terms and rates are presented by individual lenders and may vary. Always review the full loan agreement before accepting. MoneyMutual does not guarantee loan approval or specific conditions.

    4. Choose Your Lender and Finalize the Loan

    If you find an offer that suits your needs, you’ll proceed to the lender’s website to complete their application and provide any necessary documentation. This may include verification of income or banking details, depending on the lender’s requirements.

    Once finalized, funding can often occur within 24 hours.

    5. Receive Funds Directly Into Your Bank Account

    Approved borrowers generally receive their funds through direct deposit into their checking account. Depending on the time of approval and your bank’s processing speed, money may arrive as early as the next business day.

    Eligibility Requirements

    MoneyMutual is designed to be inclusive, but there are still basic eligibility rules you must meet before applying:

    • You must be at least 18 years old
    • You must be a U.S. citizen or permanent resident
    • You must earn a verifiable income (typically $800 or more per month)
    • You must have an active checking account in your name

    These requirements help ensure that lenders can evaluate your repayment potential, even if your credit history isn’t perfect.

    No Impact on Credit Score to Check Offers

    One of the most borrower-friendly aspects of the MoneyMutual process is that the initial application does not trigger a hard credit inquiry. This means you can explore your loan options without risking a drop in your credit score—something especially important for people already trying to rebuild.

    Disclaimer: Final loan approval may involve a hard credit pull, but that process happens only after you choose to proceed with a specific lender.

    Safe, Secure, and Private

    MoneyMutual uses advanced security protocols, including data encryption, to protect your personal information at every step. The form is hosted on a secure server, and the platform does not sell your data to third-party marketers.

    This gives you the ability to search for personal loans with low credit online in a way that is private, protected, and respectful of your financial situation.

    Rejected elsewhere? MoneyMutual connects you with lenders who understand bad credit. Apply now and compare real offers—no obligation to accept!

    Features, Loan Terms, and Eligibility

    When considering a personal loan—especially one tailored for bad credit—transparency around loan terms and eligibility criteria is critical. Unlike traditional banks that often bury key details in fine print, the MoneyMutual platform gives borrowers the ability to compare offers upfront and select the loan structure that works best for their specific needs and financial circumstances.

    This section explores the loan features commonly available through the MoneyMutual network, typical repayment terms, who qualifies, and what to expect after acceptance.

    Typical Loan Amounts and Use Cases

    While individual lenders ultimately determine the loan amounts they offer, MoneyMutual borrowers can typically expect access to loans ranging from $200 to $5,000. The size of your loan offer depends on several factors, including:

    • Monthly income
    • Employment status
    • Existing debts
    • Banking history

    These loans are designed to cover a wide range of emergency or short-term needs, such as:

    • Car repairs or maintenance
    • Rent or utility bills
    • Medical expenses
    • Unexpected travel or family emergencies
    • Debt consolidation
    • Small business cash flow needs

    Whether you’re searching for same-day loans, emergency loans for bad credit, or installment loans for low credit scores, the MoneyMutual platform accommodates a variety of needs with fast matching and no unnecessary complications.

    Repayment Terms and Flexibility

    One of the benefits of using MoneyMutual is that you’re not locked into a single repayment structure. Because the platform connects you with multiple lenders, you can compare loan terms and select one that aligns with your financial plan.

    While terms vary by lender, common options include:

    • Repayment periods from 90 days to 24 months or longer
    • Fixed monthly payments that remain consistent throughout the loan
    • Clear visibility into total loan costs before acceptance
    • Option to repay early (in most cases) without penalties

    Disclaimer: Specific repayment terms, interest rates, and prepayment policies are determined by the lender. Always review the full loan agreement before proceeding.

    Interest Rates and Fee Structures

    APR rates offered through lenders in the MoneyMutual network vary widely based on credit profile, loan amount, and loan term. However, they typically fall within a broad range that may span from 5.99% to 35.99%, depending on the risk profile of the borrower and the lender’s policy.

    Other potential fees may include:

    • Loan origination fees
    • Late payment charges
    • Non-sufficient funds (NSF) fees
    • Optional add-on services (if offered)

    MoneyMutual does not charge users to access or use the platform, and there are no fees for submitting your initial loan request.

    Disclaimer on pricing: Always check the lender’s full terms before accepting any offer. Pricing, rates, and fees are subject to change at any time. Refer to the official MoneyMutual website and your selected lender for the most current and accurate information.

    Who Is Eligible?

    MoneyMutual’s lending partners aim to serve borrowers who may be overlooked by traditional institutions. While final loan decisions are made by lenders individually, general eligibility guidelines include:

    • Minimum age: 18 years
    • Must be a U.S. citizen or legal resident
    • Minimum monthly income requirement (commonly $800+)
    • Must have an active checking account for deposit and repayment purposes

    These inclusive criteria open the door for people with a wide range of credit scores to access funds quickly and without embarrassment.

    Designed for People With Bad Credit

    Unlike banks that prioritize high FICO scores, many of the lenders within MoneyMutual’s network place greater emphasis on income stability, repayment history on current accounts, and overall financial patterns rather than credit score alone.

    This makes the platform especially valuable for:

    • Individuals recovering from past financial hardship
    • Borrowers with recent delinquencies or limited credit history
    • Self-employed individuals or gig workers with variable income

    If you’re searching for the best bad credit lending provider for personal loans with low credit online, this type of flexibility and responsiveness is exactly what sets MoneyMutual apart.

    Get peace of mind fast. Use MoneyMutual’s trusted platform to apply for bad credit personal loans online—no cost, no hassle, just options. Apply now!

    Is It Safe? Security, Transparency, and Customer Support

    When applying for personal loans online—especially with bad credit—it’s normal to feel skeptical or cautious. Many borrowers have heard horror stories of identity theft, phishing scams, or bait-and-switch loan offers that leave them in worse financial shape than when they started.

    That’s why it’s essential to use a platform that emphasizes transparency, trust, and secure technology at every step. MoneyMutual has structured its service to give borrowers the tools and peace of mind they need to apply with confidence.

    Built on Trust and Industry Longevity

    MoneyMutual has been operating for over a decade, connecting millions of users with lenders that provide personal loans for low credit profiles. Unlike newer platforms or unfamiliar lenders, it’s a name that many borrowers recognize and associate with safety, ease of use, and fast results.

    Its business model is also clear and consumer-first: MoneyMutual is a loan connection platform, not a direct lender. It does not make decisions about approval, rates, or loan terms. Instead, it acts as a bridge, bringing borrowers and lenders together in a single, secure location.

    Because of this structure, the company never pressures you into taking a loan, and it does not benefit from steering you toward any particular lender. Your options are entirely your own to evaluate.

    Encryption and Data Protection

    Security is a top priority for any financial application, and MoneyMutual has implemented multiple layers of protection to ensure your personal data is never compromised. The platform uses SSL encryption for all data transfers, which means your information is protected from third-party interception during the application process.

    In addition:

    • Sensitive information (like Social Security numbers and banking details) is never stored long-term
    • The site complies with federal data privacy standards
    • Information submitted is used solely to match you with lenders
    • User data is not sold to external marketers or spam networks

    This commitment to data protection makes MoneyMutual a trustworthy resource for people seeking personal loans with low credit online, especially when privacy is non-negotiable.

    Disclaimer: Although MoneyMutual follows strict security protocols, users should still exercise caution by verifying any lender communication and never providing login credentials to unsolicited sources.

    Transparent Terms and Zero Pressure

    One of the platform’s key benefits is the no-obligation structure it follows. When you submit a request through MoneyMutual, you’ll receive potential loan offers from vetted lenders, but you’re never required to accept one.

    Each offer clearly outlines the following details before you commit:

    • Loan amount
    • Repayment term and schedule
    • Interest rate or APR
    • All fees and the total repayment estimate
    • Contact information for the lender

    This upfront clarity allows you to compare multiple offers side by side and choose only what feels right for your budget.

    Disclaimer: Individual lenders may have varying disclosure practices. Be sure to request full loan documentation and carefully review all conditions before agreeing to any offer.

    Responsive Customer Support

    MoneyMutual offers multiple ways to get in touch if you need help navigating the platform, have concerns about a lender, or simply want to confirm information. While customer service policies and response times may vary slightly, typical support options include:

    • Email contact forms for general inquiries
    • A dedicated support section with FAQs
    • Guidance through the application process, if needed

    If your issue involves a specific lender, MoneyMutual will direct you to that provider for resolution, as it does not manage loans directly. However, the platform remains available as a point of contact for platform-related questions or concerns.

    A Marketplace Designed With Borrower Safety in Mind

    By offering fast access to a diverse network of lenders, without selling data or charging fees, MoneyMutual has built a reputation as one of the safest online marketplaces for people seeking personal loans for bad credit. From encryption to transparency and helpful customer service, the platform’s infrastructure is designed to reduce friction and protect borrowers from unnecessary risk.

    If you’ve been hesitant to apply for loans online because of safety concerns, MoneyMutual offers a path forward that’s structured for protection, not pressure.

    Don’t wait for banks to say no again. MoneyMutual connects you with lenders ready to help—apply today and see offers in just minutes!

    Real-World Use Cases & Testimonials

    One of the best ways to understand how a lending platform works is through the lens of those who’ve used it. While every financial situation is different, the flexibility and speed of MoneyMutual have made it a preferred option for thousands of borrowers seeking personal loans with low credit online.

    This section walks through several realistic borrower profiles that reflect common financial needs and how the MoneyMutual platform helped connect them with timely solutions. These use cases are illustrative and based on typical user experiences. They do not guarantee specific results.

    Disclaimer: Individual outcomes may vary. These are generalized examples provided for illustrative purposes only and do not represent endorsements or claims.

    Emergency Auto Repair – Jacob, 32, Delivery Driver

    Jacob relies on his car to work for multiple app-based delivery services. When his transmission failed unexpectedly, he needed $1,200 to cover repairs. With a credit score in the mid-500s and no access to credit cards, he turned to MoneyMutual.

    He completed the quick application form on a weekday morning and received several loan offers within the hour. He selected an installment loan with a 6-month repayment term and received the funds the next day. The platform’s speed and simplicity allowed him to get back to work without interruption.

    Medical Expenses – Liana, 26, Self-Employed Freelancer

    Liana works as a freelance graphic designer and doesn’t have traditional health insurance. After an emergency room visit left her with a medical bill she couldn’t afford up front, she explored bad credit personal loans online.

    MoneyMutual connected her with a lender offering a $2,500 loan over a 12-month term. The offer included full transparency on interest rate, fees, and repayment schedule—something she hadn’t found with other platforms. While she carefully reviewed the terms and sought guidance from a financial advisor before accepting, the flexible repayment structure helped her manage the expense without defaulting on other bills.

    Disclaimer: This example is for general educational purposes. Consult a licensed financial expert before accepting any loan to cover medical costs.

    Rent Shortfall – Tonya, 44, Recently Divorced

    After a sudden divorce disrupted Tonya’s finances, she found herself a few hundred dollars short on rent. With most of her emergency savings depleted and a credit score below 600 due to past credit card debt, she feared eviction was around the corner.

    MoneyMutual matched her with a short-term loan provider offering $750 with a 60-day repayment window. Though the interest rate was higher than a traditional bank loan, it was manageable, and the funds were deposited in her account within 24 hours. The process helped her maintain housing stability during a critical transition.

    Business Inventory Gap – Carlos, 38, Local Retailer

    Carlos owns a small online shop that experienced a surge in demand. He needed a few thousand dollars to restock inventory quickly but had been declined by his local bank due to a prior loan default from years ago.

    Through MoneyMutual, he found a lender willing to work with his current income and business documentation, even with past credit issues. The loan allowed him to bridge the cash flow gap and capitalize on seasonal demand without interrupting operations.

    Low credit? No problem. Submit your free loan request through MoneyMutual now and get matched with lenders who get it—money may arrive in 24 hours!

    How MoneyMutual Compares to Other Loan Services

    When searching for the best bad credit lending provider for personal loans with low credit online, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed by the number of platforms making similar promises. From payday loan companies to emerging FinTech apps, the space is filled with options, but not all are created equal.

    This section provides a clear side-by-side comparison of MoneyMutual with other commonly searched lending services, focusing on approval speed, credit requirements, transparency, and borrower experience.

    Traditional Banks and Credit Unions

    Most brick-and-mortar financial institutions prioritize high credit scores and long-standing banking history. If your FICO score is below 600, you’re likely to be denied a personal loan outright, regardless of your income or current financial stability.

    • Approval Time: Several days to weeks
    • Minimum Credit Score: Typically 650+
    • Requirements: Extensive documentation, sometimes collateral
    • Loan Terms: Rigid and less flexible for bad credit borrowers
    • Accessibility: Low for people with poor or no credit

    These institutions may offer low-interest rates, but they are largely inaccessible to individuals in financial transition or recovery.

    Payday and Title Loan Stores

    Payday lenders are often located in storefronts or operate online with offers that appear fast and hassle-free. However, these loans come with extremely short repayment timelines, high fees, and interest rates that can spiral into unmanageable debt.

    • Approval Time: Same day
    • Minimum Credit Score: Usually not required
    • Requirements: Proof of income and a post-dated check or bank access
    • Loan Terms: 2 to 4 weeks; full balance due immediately
    • Accessibility: Very high, but high risk

    Borrowers may receive money fast, but often fall into a cycle of rollover loans with ballooning costs.

    Peer-to-Peer Lending Platforms

    Newer digital platforms like peer-to-peer (P2P) marketplaces match borrowers with individual investors. These platforms offer moderate access for borrowers with fair credit but usually include higher rejection rates for those with bad or no credit history.

    • Approval Time: 1 to 5 days
    • Minimum Credit Score: Typically 600+
    • Requirements: Income verification, banking history
    • Loan Terms: Moderate flexibility
    • Accessibility: Moderate, limited for subprime credit

    P2P options are ideal for mid-tier borrowers but may not serve those facing urgent needs or low scores.

    How MoneyMutual Stands Apart

    MoneyMutual differentiates itself by prioritizing access, speed, and borrower safety—all while providing a no-pressure environment to explore options.

    • Approval Time: Offers may appear in minutes; funding often within 24 hours
    • Minimum Credit Score: Varies; many lenders accept bad or limited credit
    • Requirements: U.S. residency, 18+ years of age, minimum income (typically $800/month), active bank account
    • Loan Terms: Flexible repayment terms, including installment loan structures
    • Accessibility: High for borrowers with poor credit or limited credit history

    What makes MoneyMutual especially compelling is its marketplace model. Rather than acting as a lender, it gives you access to multiple providers, which improves your odds of approval and allows you to compare loan offers side by side, without harming your credit score just to explore your options.

    Disclaimer: MoneyMutual is not a direct lender and does not guarantee loan approval. Each lender establishes its own terms, credit evaluation process, and rate structure. Always confirm details with your selected lender before accepting any financial product.

    Summary

    Whether you’re navigating financial hardship or trying to rebuild after credit damage, most platforms either restrict your access or charge high fees for subpar loan terms. MoneyMutual stands out by offering a balance of accessibility, speed, and lender transparency, making it one of the best platforms for finding personal loans with low credit online.

    MoneyMutual makes it easy to apply for a personal loan—even with bad credit. No fees, no pressure, just fast matching with real lenders. Start now!

    Pricing Transparency, Refund Policy, and Contact Info

    When dealing with financial platforms—especially those offering access to personal loans with low credit—clear information about pricing, fees, and support channels is essential for building trust. MoneyMutual separates itself from many others in the space by offering a transparent and obligation-free experience for borrowers seeking emergency loans for bad credit online.

    This section outlines what users can expect regarding service fees, platform usage, lender charges, and how to get help if needed.

    Is MoneyMutual Really Free to Use?

    Yes, the MoneyMutual platform is entirely free for users. Borrowers pay no fees to:

    • Submit a loan request
    • Receive lender offers
    • Use the site or platform features

    There are no subscription costs, hidden charges, or application fees required to access the MoneyMutual network of lenders. This fee-free model makes it one of the most accessible tools available for individuals with poor credit searching for a legitimate loan provider online.

    Instead of charging consumers, MoneyMutual earns compensation from its network of lenders, which pay a referral fee when a connection results in a finalized loan agreement. This allows the company to offer a completely free service to borrowers while still maintaining operational support and security standards.

    Lender Fees and Loan Costs

    While MoneyMutual itself does not charge you, any lender you connect with through the platform may assess fees or interest charges depending on your selected loan. These may include:

    • Interest or APR (Annual Percentage Rate) — often based on credit risk
    • Origination or processing fees — occasionally deducted from the loan amount
    • Late payment penalties — charged for missed due dates
    • Optional service fees — sometimes offered with payment protection plans or customer service add-ons

    Disclaimer on pricing: Loan costs are set by the individual lenders, not MoneyMutual. Always read the loan agreement carefully before accepting. Final terms, including repayment amounts and due dates, must be verified directly with your lender. Pricing is subject to change at any time. Please consult the official MoneyMutual website or your lender for the most up-to-date details.

    Refunds or Loan Cancellations

    Because MoneyMutual is not a lender and does not issue or service loans directly, it does not offer a refund policy in the traditional sense. Any cancellations, term adjustments, or repayment disputes must be handled through the lender that issued the loan.

    However, if you feel you’ve received suspicious communications or need assistance in understanding the legitimacy of a lender within the MoneyMutual network, their support team may help guide you toward appropriate actions or refer you to the correct lender.

    If you suspect a loan agreement was made in error or under misleading conditions, it’s important to contact your lender immediately and document all communication.

    Note: MoneyMutual does not intervene in repayment negotiations. If you need assistance with loan modification or dispute resolution, consult your lender’s customer service department or a licensed financial advisor.

    How to Contact MoneyMutual

    For questions about the platform, your loan request status, or general support, MoneyMutual provides access to help through:

    • Official website contact form
    • Help center with frequently asked questions
    • Support resources for borrowers needing clarification on process steps

    If you’re unsure whether an email or phone call claiming to be from MoneyMutual is legitimate, you can verify communications through the contact options listed on the official website.

    At this time, MoneyMutual does not publish a direct phone line for borrower inquiries, and support is typically handled through secure web-based communication channels. For questions related to an active or finalized loan, you’ll need to reach out to the specific lender listed in your offer or agreement.

    Take control of your finances. Submit a free loan request on MoneyMutual today and explore trusted bad credit options—without risking your score!

    Final Thoughts – Should You Use MoneyMutual?

    For borrowers navigating financial uncertainty with a low credit score, access to reliable funding often feels out of reach. Traditional lenders impose high barriers, payday loan companies offer short-term fixes with long-term consequences, and many online platforms lack transparency. In contrast, MoneyMutual provides a structured, secure, and borrower-first approach to finding personal loans with low credit online.

    Why MoneyMutual Is a Smart Choice in 2025

    MoneyMutual offers more than just speed—it offers peace of mind. It’s a free, easy-to-use loan connection platform that helps individuals find emergency funds quickly without subjecting them to predatory terms or opaque fees.

    Key reasons borrowers continue to choose MoneyMutual include:

    • Fast application process that takes just minutes
    • No upfront fees to access loan options
    • Multiple loan offers from a network of vetted lenders
    • Soft credit inquiry only at the prequalification stage
    • Funding available as soon as the next business day
    • Clear visibility into loan terms, fees, and repayment timelines

    By focusing on borrower empowerment and financial inclusion, MoneyMutual addresses a critical market gap—helping people rebuild stability even when credit histories are imperfect.

    When MoneyMutual Might Be Right for You

    This platform is ideal for borrowers who:

    • Have a credit score below 600
    • Need $200 to $5,000 for an urgent or short-term need
    • Have a steady income but no access to credit cards or traditional loans
    • Are you looking for a loan provider that allows you to compare terms before committing
    • Want a process that is private, secure, and available online

    It’s also a good fit for people looking to avoid the pitfalls of payday loans, who value having repayment options spread out over time, and who want to avoid high-pressure tactics.

    Disclaimer: This article is not financial advice. Always consult with a licensed financial advisor before entering into any loan agreement. Terms and loan availability vary by lender, and final loan decisions rest entirely with the lending institution. Carefully review all documentation before signing.

    Ready to Take the Next Step?

    If you’ve been searching for the best bad credit lending provider for personal loans with low credit online, MoneyMutual stands out in 2025 as a leading option. With its commitment to transparency, borrower safety, and fast access to real loan offers, it provides a path forward when other doors have closed.

    Take control of your financial future today.

    Start your free application at MoneyMutual.com

    Disclaimer on pricing: Always check the official website for current rates, terms, and eligibility requirements. Pricing and conditions are subject to change at any time and may vary by lender.

    Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

    What is the best bad credit lending provider for personal loans with low credit online?

    MoneyMutual is widely considered one of the best platforms for connecting borrowers with personal loans for bad credit online. It offers a fast, secure, and free-to-use network that matches individuals with lenders willing to work with low credit scores. The platform allows borrowers to compare loan offers without hard credit inquiries and provides flexible repayment options.

    Can I get a personal loan online with a credit score under 600?

    Yes. Many of the lenders partnered with MoneyMutual specialize in installment loans for bad credit, even for individuals with scores below 600. These lenders often evaluate your income and banking history, not just your FICO score, making loan access more inclusive.

    Are personal loans for bad credit guaranteed through MoneyMutual?

    No legitimate lender can guarantee loan approval, and MoneyMutual does not make direct loans or promises of guaranteed funding. However, the platform significantly improves your chances by connecting you with a wide range of vetted lenders who offer emergency loans for bad credit and flexible underwriting.

    Disclaimer: Approval is based on individual lender criteria. Always read the loan agreement carefully before accepting.

    How fast can I get my money if I’m approved?

    In many cases, borrowers receive their funds within 24 hours after loan approval. Timing can vary depending on the lender’s process and your bank’s deposit policies, but MoneyMutual’s goal is to provide quick loans for bad credit with minimal delays.

    Is it safe to apply for a personal loan through MoneyMutual?

    Yes. MoneyMutual uses SSL encryption and privacy protections to secure your data during the loan request process. The platform does not sell your information and works only with licensed, reputable lenders.

    What types of loans can I get with bad credit?

    Through MoneyMutual’s lender network, borrowers can access:

    • Installment loans for bad credit
    • Emergency loans with fast approvals
    • Short-term personal loans for poor credit
    • Cash advance options for urgent expenses

    Loan amounts typically range from $200 to $5,000, depending on your income and lender policies.

    Does applying through MoneyMutual affect my credit score?

    Submitting your information through MoneyMutual does not trigger a hard credit check. Initial matching is done with soft inquiries only. If you proceed with a lender’s offer, that lender may run a hard credit pull during final approval.

    What are the minimum requirements to apply?

    To qualify for a loan through MoneyMutual, you generally must:

    • Be at least 18 years old
    • Be a U.S. citizen or legal resident
    • Have a steady income (often $800/month minimum)
    • Maintain an active checking account

    These requirements make MoneyMutual a strong option for borrowers with limited or poor credit history.

    What interest rates should I expect with a bad credit loan?

    Interest rates vary by lender and borrower profile. APRs typically range from 5.99% to 35.99%, depending on creditworthiness, income, and loan term. Always compare offers carefully and ensure you understand the total repayment cost before committing.

    Disclaimer on pricing: Always verify current terms and fees directly with your selected lender. Rates and pricing are subject to change. Refer to the official MoneyMutual website for the latest information.

    Can I repay the loan early without penalties?

    Most lenders in the MoneyMutual network allow early repayment with no prepayment penalties, but this varies by provider. Read your loan agreement carefully or contact the lender directly to confirm.

    Financial emergency? Get connected to lenders fast with MoneyMutual—no hidden fees, no hard credit pull, and funds as fast as 24 hours. Apply now!

    • Company: MoneyMutual
    • Address: 2510 E. Sunset Rd. Ste 6, #85 Las Vegas NV, 89120
    • Email: customerservice@moneymutual.com
    • Phone Support: 844-276-2063

    Disclaimer and Affiliate Disclosure

    The information contained in this article is provided strictly for general informational and educational purposes and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. While efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information presented at the time of publication, no warranty or representation is made regarding the completeness, reliability, suitability, or accuracy of the content. The publisher, content creators, syndication partners, distribution platforms, and any affiliated parties expressly disclaim all liability for any errors, omissions, outdated information, inaccuracies, or misunderstandings that may arise from reliance on this content. Readers are solely responsible for verifying any and all details directly with the official source or provider before making financial decisions.

    All product descriptions, loan terms, eligibility criteria, rates, fees, and other specifications mentioned in this content are subject to change at any time without notice. Final loan terms, availability, interest rates, fees, and approval decisions are solely determined by the individual lender, not the publisher, platform, or any associated parties. The publisher and syndication partners do not issue loans, broker loans, or act as financial institutions or lending intermediaries.

    The operator of this website is not a lender, does not arrange, facilitate, or broker loans to lenders, and does not make short-term cash loans or credit decisions. It is not an agent, representative, arranger, facilitator, or broker of any lender and does not endorse any lender or charge consumers for any service or product. This website does not constitute an offer or solicitation to lend. This website allows consumers to submit information to a lender in order for a lender to determine if they may be able to offer a short-term loan. However, providing information on this website does not guarantee that a lender will be able to work with the consumer or that a consumer will be approved for a loan.

    Cash advances should only be used to address immediate short-term financial needs and are not intended as a long-term financial solution. Not all lenders can provide up to $5,000. Cash transfer times may vary between lenders and may depend on individual financial institutions. For specific details, questions, or concerns regarding a short-term cash loan, consumers must contact their lender directly. Lender services may not be available to residents of all states based on individual lender requirements. This service is not available in Connecticut. Furthermore, this service is not available in New York or to New York borrowers due to interest rate limits under New York law.

    Some lenders may obtain credit checks, consumer credit reports, or other personal data from credit reporting agencies such as Experian, Equifax, TransUnion, or alternative providers.

    Any mention of specific loan amounts, approval timelines, interest rates, or lender features is provided for illustrative purposes only and does not represent an endorsement, guarantee, or contractual offer. The publisher and syndication partners are not responsible for any agreements, contracts, disputes, or financial outcomes between consumers and any lender referenced in this content.

    The publisher, content creators, syndication partners, and all affiliated parties disclaim any liability for financial loss, reputational harm, damages, claims, or disputes arising from actions taken based on the information presented herein. Readers are strongly encouraged to perform independent research and consult with a licensed financial advisor, attorney, or other qualified professional before making financial decisions or entering into any loan agreement.

    This content may include affiliate links. If a reader clicks on an affiliate link and completes a qualifying action—such as submitting a loan request or securing a loan—one or more parties involved in the creation, publication, or distribution of this content may receive financial compensation from the financial service provider. This compensation does not increase the cost to the consumer and does not influence the editorial integrity or objectivity of the content.

    Inclusion or syndication of this article on any third-party website, platform, or media outlet does not constitute an endorsement by the publisher, syndication partners, or any affiliated party of the services or financial products referenced herein.

    Readers are advised to refer to the official website of any financial provider for the most up-to-date and complete product information, disclosures, loan terms, eligibility requirements, rates, fees, and customer service contact details prior to making any financial decisions.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: WEEK 16 WINS: President Trump Advances America’s New Golden Age

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    This week, President Donald J. Trump advanced his America First agenda with remarkable successes that bolster the economy, enhance national security, and promote global stability. From a landmark trade agreement to bold steps to secure our borders and skies, President Trump is delivering results that matter to every American.
    Here is a non-comprehensive list of wins in week 16:
    President Trump announced a “breakthrough” trade deal with the United Kingdom that expands market access, curbs non-tariff barriers, and levels the playing field for American exporters.
    National Cattlemen’s Beef Association: “President Trump has delivered a tremendous win for American family farmers and ranchers … Thank you, President Trump, for fighting for American cattle producers.”
    National Corn Growers Association: “This is great news. We applaud President Trump and his administration for brokering this deal.”
    International Dairy Foods Association: “On behalf of America’s dairy processors and producers, IDFA applauds President Trump’s announcement today that the United States and the United Kingdom have reached the terms for a significant trade deal between our two markets that promises to expand access for U.S. agricultural goods, reduce tariffs, and remove barriers to trade.”

    President Donald J. Trump’s relentless pursuit of manufacturing dominance spurred onshoring and additional U.S. investment.
    The Wall Street Journal: Trump’s Tariffs Are Lifting Some U.S. Manufacturers
    The Washington Post: This U.S. manufacturer doesn’t mind Trump’s tariffs at all
    Bristol Myers Squibb announced a $40 billion investment over the next five years in its research, development, technology, and U.S.-based manufacturing operations.
    Gilead Sciences announced an $11 billion boost to its planned U.S.-based manufacturing investment.
    Invenergy announced a $1.7 billion investment in U.S. electric transmission.
    Merck Animal Health announced an $895 million investment to expand their manufacturing operation in Kansas.
    Wistron Corp., a Taiwanese electronics manufacturer and AI server maker, announced $455 million in additional U.S. investment.
    Lego announced a $366 million investment to build a new distribution center in Prince George County, Virginia.
    Hotpack, a Dubai-based maker of food packaging materials and related products, announced a $100 million investment to establish its first U.S. manufacturing facility in Edison, New Jersey.

    The Trump Administration unveiled a plan to completely overhaul the nation’s air traffic control system, building on the unprecedented actions already taken to secure America’s skies and improve air travel.
    American Airlines CEO Robert Isom: “This plan from President Trump and Secretary Duffy is absolutely the best opportunity that we’ve had in decades to do something about our outdated air traffic control infrastructure and build a best-in-class system that our country deserves.”
    Delta Air Lines CEO Ed Bastian: “I want to especially thank Secretary Duffy and the Administration for gathering us all here today and taking such a strong approach to overhauling our air traffic control system in the U.S.”
    United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby: “This really is an historic day — a day I have been looking forward to my entire career when I felt like we have turned the corner and are on the path to give the United States the best-in-class air traffic control system that the citizens of the United States deserve.”
    Southwest Airlines CEO Bob Jordan: “I cannot say enough thanks to Secretary Duffy, to the administration, to President Trump for the stellar leadership to bring everyone together on this problem.”

    President Trump continued to secure our borders, rid our communities of illegal immigrant criminals, and keep Americans safe.
    President Trump announced plans to house America’s most ruthless, violent criminals at Alcatraz prison.
    President Trump established “Project Homecoming” to encourage illegal immigrants to voluntarily depart the U.S.
    The Department of Justice announced the takedown of a massive drug and weapons trafficking organization in New Mexico, operated by the Sinaloa cartel — resulting in the largest fentanyl seizure in our nation’s history and the arrests of six high-level cartel members illegally in the U.S.
    The Department of Justice announced that 115 children were rescued and 205 child sex predators were arrested in just five days as part of Operation Restore Justice.
    The Department of Homeland Security announced it will offer financial assistance and stipends for illegal immigrants voluntarily returning to their home country via the CBP Home App — saving taxpayers as much as $1 million per illegal alien family in long-term costs of welfare and public support.
    Breitbart: Southern Border Migrant Apprehensions Continue Record-Shattering Decline
    Fox News: Daycare in wealthy enclave shutters after housing fugitive child predator arrested by ICE
    The percentage of Americans “who worry a great deal” about crime has fallen by ten points over last year.

    President Trump continued to pursue peace through strength around the world.
    President Trump announced a ceasefire with Houthi terrorists in Yemen, restoring freedom of navigation in the Red Sea for U.S.-flagged ships.
    The Department of the Treasury targeted a third teapot refinery for facilitating the delivery of Iranian oil as part of President Trump’s broad and aggressive maximum pressure campaign.
    The Department of State designated Haitian gangs as foreign terrorist organizations.
    The Department of State announced all hostages held by the Maduro regime at the Argentinian Embassy in Caracas, Venezuela, were rescued and brought safely to the U.S.

    A new survey showed 70% of farmers expect the President Trump’s tariffs to strengthen the agricultural economy in the long-term.
    President Trump announced his first wave of judicial nominations.
    President Trump ended federal funding for dangerous gain-of-function research in foreign countries.
    President Trump ended the racist and discriminatory Biden-era “Digital Equity Act,” which provided billions in handouts based on race.
    President Trump announced new tariffs on movies produced in foreign countries in an effort to boost the American film industry.
    President Trump signed an Executive Order to restore a robust domestic manufacturing base for prescription drugs and promote domestic production of critical medicines.
    President Trump eliminated useless water pressure standards that make household appliances less effective and more expensive.
    President Trump signed an Executive Order to provide better care to veterans, improve accountability for such care, and establish a National Center for Warrior Independence for homeless veterans.
    President Trump signed an Executive Order to ease the regulatory burden on Americans and ensure no one is transformed into a criminal for violating a regulation they have no reason to know exists.
    President Trump directed his administration to expeditiously implement the most effective mechanisms, barriers, and other measures to prevent the migration and expansion of invasive carp in the Great Lakes Basin and the surrounding region.
    President Trump directed the Office of the Federal Register to speed up publishing time and decrease costs, enabling agencies to more quickly and effectively restore freedom through President Trump’s deregulatory agenda.
    President Trump officially declared May 8 as “Victory Day for World War II” in commemoration of the unmatched might, strength, and power of the American Armed Forces.
    The Department of Education continued their rigorous oversight of secondary and higher education institutions to ensure compliance with federal law.
    The Department of Education opened an investigation into the Saratoga Springs City School District in New York for Title IX violations relating to male participation in female sports and occupation of female facilities.
    The Department of Education informed Harvard University that the federal government will no longer award new grants to the university amid their failure to uphold federal law.
    The Department of Education opened a formal foreign funding investigation into the University of Pennsylvania after a review of the university’s foreign reports revealed inaccurate and incomplete disclosures.
    The Department of Education initiated a Title IX investigation into Western Carolina University amid allegations the school failed to ensure sex-separated intimate spaces.
    The Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism announced a review of recent incidents of anti-Semitic violence at the University of Washington and its affiliates.

    The Department of Education resumed collections for student borrowers in default following a five-year pause and reminded institutions of their obligations to support student loan borrowers.
    The Department of Education directed states to maximize parental options for choosing the safest school setting for their children.
    The Department of Justice opened an investigation into a recent policy by Hennepin County, Minnesota, to consider race in plea deals.
    The Department of the Treasury announced a fast-track process to facilitate greater investment in U.S. businesses from ally and partner sources.
    The Department of Energy announced new policies to limit indirect costs of certain grant funding, which is projected to save taxpayers more than $935 million per year.
    The Department of Energy halted the Biden-era ban on fossil fuels in federal buildings, ensuring they’re utilizing the most efficient power available to lower taxpayer costs and curb regulatory overreach.
    The Department of State closed its “Office of Palestinian Affairs,” a Biden-era creation that encouraged Israel not to respond to the October 7 terrorist attacks.
    The Department of Health and Human Services warned medical schools that DEI admissions or employment practices violate federal law and must be eliminated, or the institution risks its federal funding.
    The National Institutes of Health announced all beagle experiments on its campus have been terminated.
    The Department of Agriculture announced the removal of hazardous fuels — such as dead or downed trees — that pose wildfire threats to communities, critical infrastructure, and recreation areas.
    The Department of Agriculture announced enhanced enforcement for making sure states are appropriately and lawfully preserving SNAP benefits for only eligible Americans.
    The Department of Housing and Urban Development, in collaboration with First Lady Melania Trump, announced an investment in a new program to prevent homelessness in Americans aging out of the foster care system.
    The Department of Labor recovered more than $1.4 million in back wages for more than 2,600 employees after finding a California company had failed to pay its employees proper rates.
    The Department of Labor announced additional funding to support disaster-relief jobs and continue employment training for Tennesseans and Floridians affected by last year’s tropical storms.
    The Department of Transportation terminated $54 million in woke, radical grant funding.
    The Office of the Director of National Intelligence released an additional 60,000 documents related to the assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy.
    The Supreme Court ruled the Trump administration can enforce its ban on individuals with gender dysphoria serving in the military, boosting efforts to restore a military focused on readiness rather than woke gender ideology.
    President Trump announced Washington, D.C., will host the NFL Draft in 2027.
    The House of Representatives passed a bill to codify President Trump’s “Gulf of America” Executive Order.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Ways you can help a vulnerable person in Canberra

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    In brief:

    • There are many Canberrans who can do with a helping hand.
    • The ACT has many services and initiatives that may be of benefit, whatever the situation.
    • This article features a list of some of these services.

    There are many vulnerable people in our community. Perhaps you know someone who is:

    • at risk
    • chronically unwell
    • unhappy, lonely or isolated
    • elderly or frail
    • facing financial difficulty
    • new to Canberra.

    Whether it’s a family member, neighbour or colleague you’re concerned about, reaching out is a great first step.

    Where relevant, you could help them make a call or fill out a form. You could even go along to an appointment or event with them.

    The list of services below is not exhaustive but may benefit someone you know. Most are free or low cost.

    Help with day-to-day living

    Eligible ACT residents who cannot take their bins out to the kerb, due to chronic illness, frail age or disability, can apply to have this done for them.

    A Companion Card allows people with significant and permanent disabilities to bring a companion for free to certain events and venues.

    Canberrans having difficulty paying for groceries can visit Communities at Work pantries for discounted food and other essentials.

    Communities at Work also provides free clothing, shoes and accessories for job interviews, court, funerals and other important events.

    Canberrans can access free period products throughout the ACT.

    Find more information on cost-of-living assistance.

    Help with transport

    Community bus services are for ACT residents who find it hard to use other forms of transport. They run from Monday to Friday and have flexible routes.

    The ACT Taxi Subsidy Scheme provides financial help to ACT residents with a disability or significant mobility restriction that prevents them from using public and community transport.

    Transport Canberra’s Flexible Bus Service helps Canberrans, such as the aged or people with mobility difficulties, get from their home to local community locations. Booking is required. Carers with a valid carers card are also welcome to travel.

    Special needs transport is available for eligible students. Please check the application open dates and guidelines in advance.

    The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander bus service provides opportunities for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders to connect with their communities and culture in the ACT and surrounding regions.

    More information regarding bus operating and booking hours, eligibility and guidelines for all services is available on Transport Canberra’s website.

    The Fitness to Drive Medical Clinic assesses fitness to drive a motor vehicle.

    Help with health care and wellbeing

    Mobile dental clinics Mobile Dental Clinics are an additional service for aged, school children and vulnerable Canberrans to access dental care in the community.

    Canberrans can access short term loan equipment via the ACT Equipment Loan Service. This is available on referral and includes:

    • mobility aids
    • hoists
    • wheelchairs
    • hospital beds and more.

    This free, short-term service is for anyone being discharged from hospital and for ACT residents needing rehab or to trial equipment.

    Eligible Canberrans with a lifelong or long-term disability  may be able to  access the ACT Equipment Scheme. The scheme can provide long term loan equipment that will help people live at home safely.

    Know someone who already has a mobility aid or appliance? Why not remind them they can have it serviced or repaired through the Clinical Technology Workshop?

    Anyone needing a walking aid can reach out to the Walking Aid Clinic.

    The Canberra Sexual Health Centre offers all Canberrans aged 14 and over professional care without judgment.

    Help is available to Canberrans who have experienced a change in their ability to carry out everyday activities due to a medical or health condition or disability. Brindabella Day and Ambulatory Rehabilitation Service provides a range of rehabilitation therapies.

    Community Care Nursing can assist people with a range of conditions and healthcare needs. It can also be accessed in the home, if medically necessary. Nursing services include wound care, medication management and more.

    Nutrition is a key part of health and wellbeing. The Community Care Nutrition Service offers specialised nutrition services to adults. As well as general healthy eating and nutrition support, the service can advise on chronic health conditions.

    The Liaison and Navigation Service helps adults with complex needs navigate health and other services.

    Adults with a chronic health condition affecting their quality of life may benefit from the Take Control – Live Well program. The three-week program helps people gain the skills and confidence to:

    • take control of their condition/s
    • reach health goals
    • make connections.

    Other services available include:

    You can find a range of other services on the Canberra Health Services website.

    Help to reduce loneliness

    Social isolation and loneliness can be harmful to mental and physical health. Visiting people or inviting them places can be extremely helpful. There is also a variety of ways people can meet others or find a new interest.

    Volunteering can be a great way to find connection and purpose. Canberrans looking for volunteering opportunities, workshops and advice can contact VolunteeringACT.

    There are lots of events happening every day on the Meetup website. From bushwalking to trivia, book clubs to dancing, there’s something to suit every interest.

    Older Canberrans could consider getting involved in an Intergenerational Playgroup through ACT Playgroups. These can help isolated residents and parents to connect.

    Social enterprise Café Stepping Stone runs various events at its Dickson and Strathnairn locations.

    There are also plenty of weird and wacky sports to consider. This is a great way of trying something new and meeting new people at the same time.

    Work-related help

    ACT Women’s Return to Work workshops support women and gender diverse people returning to the workforce with grants and advice on next steps.

    There is a free office skills course and ACT Government work placement for culturally and linguistically diverse Canberrans seeking meaningful employment.

    The ACT Government can help veterans transition from employment in the Australian Defence Force to the ACT Government.

    The RSL Veterans’ Employment Program is a free program helping veterans, family members and partners to find rewarding work.

    Canberrans with a business can get free business support from the Access Canberra Business Assist Team. They can help you understand permits, licenses and approvals.

    The Women’s Legal Centre ACT offers free legal advice to women in low-paid and/or precarious employment who are experiencing problems at work.

    Crisis help

    There is help for those who have experienced domestic and family violence.

    Through a range of support services, Canberrans can apply for financial support following domestic and family violence.

    Canberrans can get help to plan for safety, support children, find accommodation, sort out finances, take legal action and stay safe online.

    Tenants experiencing domestic and family violence can also break a rental lease immediately, if needed.

    There is support available to understand legal options in these circumstances.

    Find more on domestic, family and sexual violence services.

    Communities at Work Crisis Support can give immediate help with food, medical scripts and other essential supports. They can also provide:

    • bus tickets
    • phone vouchers and charging
    • showers
    • hygiene products
    • information and referral services.

    If you know someone who is homeless or at risk of becoming homeless, there is help available. Find out about more services that can help with finding a safe place to stay, getting a free meal, having a shower or doing laundry.

    There are a number of ways you can get help for your mental health in the ACT.

    If you are in crisis or need support after hours, contact:

    If you or a loved one are in an unsafe or life-threatening situation, call triple 000 immediately.

    More avenues for help include:

    Read more like this


    Get ACT news and events delivered straight to your inbox, sign up to our email newsletter:


    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Labrador Letter: Idaho Defends Truckers from California’s EV Overreach

    Source: US State of Idaho

    Home Newsroom Labrador Letter: Idaho Defends Truckers from California’s EV Overreach

    Dear Friends,
    This week, the State of California agreed to repeal key provisions of a sweeping electric-vehicle mandate known as Advanced Clean Fleets. This rule, issued by the California Air Resources Board, sought to force a nationwide shift in trucking technology without legal authority or the consent of other states. Idaho joined a 17-state coalition challenging this mandate in Nebraska v. Cliff, a case filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The settlement in that case is a major win for state sovereignty, economic freedom, and the constitutional limits on unilateral regulation. At issue was California’s attempt to impose an electric-vehicle mandate on truck fleet owners and operators nationwide through a regulatory scheme called Advanced Clean Fleets. The rule applied to any fleet that operated even a single truck in California if it met certain revenue or size thresholds, regardless of where the company was based. It required these fleets to retire internal-combustion trucks and replace them with battery-electric models under state-imposed deadlines. It also barred manufacturers from selling internal-combustion trucks in California starting in 2036. Because California houses the nation’s largest ports and serves as a gateway for approximately 40 percent of containerized imports and 30 percent of exports, trucking companies across the country depend on access to its roads and trade infrastructure. No manufacturer or fleet operator can feasibly design separate vehicle lines or logistics strategies for California alone. Faced with exclusion from a $3.9 trillion economy, businesses nationwide would be compelled to conform to California’s mandates. In practical effect, California’s regulation would set nationwide trucking policy through market coercion rather than lawful authority. That is why this case mattered not only to Idaho, but to every state that values its sovereignty and the constitutional limits on unilateral state power. The coalition’s complaint raised three legal claims. First, it argued that the rule is preempted by the federal Clean Air Act, which generally forbids states from setting their own emissions standards for new motor vehicles. There is one narrow exception that allows California to request a waiver from the Environmental Protection Agency to set its own standards, but it never requested a waiver for Advanced Clean Fleets. And even if it had asked, the EPA lacks the authority to approve rules that eliminate entire engine types. Second, the lawsuit asserted that the rule is preempted by the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act, which prohibits state regulations affecting prices, routes, or services of motor carriers. And third, the complaint argued that the rule violates the Constitution’s dormant Commerce Clause, which bars states from regulating economic activity beyond their borders. These were not abstract concerns. The regulation would have imposed immediate costs on out-of-state carriers, compelled extensive reporting obligations for any fleet that sent a truck into California, and forced manufacturers to restrict the availability of internal-combustion vehicles nationwide. Battery-electric trucks remain significantly more expensive, less efficient for long-haul routes, and dependent on a sparse charging infrastructure. For states like Idaho—where transportation, agriculture, and manufacturing rely on affordable and flexible trucking—the burdens would have been severe and unjustified. The settlement halts California’s enforcement of these provisions and requires state officials to initiate formal repeal proceedings. California also conceded that its planned 2036 ban on internal-combustion truck sales cannot be implemented unless the EPA grants a Clean Air Act waiver. Our office will remain vigilant in opposing any further efforts to federalize California’s policies through administrative fiat. California is free to pursue its own environmental goals within its own borders. What it cannot do is transform the nation’s trucking standards by threatening exclusion from its markets. Idaho joined this litigation to defend the principle that policy decisions with nationwide consequences must be made through constitutional processes—not dictated by a single state’s regulatory agency.
    Best regards,

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Isabel Schnabel: Keeping a steady hand in an unsteady world

    Source: European Central Bank

    Speech by Isabel Schnabel, Member of the Executive Board of the ECB, at Hoover Monetary Policy Conference “Finishing the Job and New Challenges”, Stanford University

    Stanford, 10 May 2025

    Standard theory of monetary policy rests on a simple premise: a stable relationship between inflation and the output gap. This is the logic behind the Phillips curve, which, in its most common form, relates inflation to a measure of economic slack, expected inflation and supply shocks.[1]

    The relationship between output and inflation was already under scrutiny well before the pandemic.

    After the global financial crisis of 2008, inflation didn’t fall nearly as much as had been implied by conventional Phillips curve estimates. And once economies around the world recovered and unemployment fell, the bounce-back in inflation fell short of model predictions.

    This is why that episode is known as the period of “missing deflation” and “missing inflation”.[2]

    The situation changed fundamentally in the aftermath of the pandemic, when the relationship between inflation and the output gap proved to be much stronger than what would have been expected based on historical estimates. We observed a noticeably steeper Phillips curve across advanced economies, including the euro area (Slide 2).[3]

    In my remarks today, I would like to draw lessons from the instability of the Phillips curve over the past 20 years for the optimal conduct of monetary policy. I will argue that the evidence of a re-flattening of the Phillips curve after the long period of high inflation suggests that, in the euro area, the most appropriate policy response to the potential risks to price stability arising from fiscal expansion and protectionism is to keep a steady hand and maintain rates close to where they are today – that is, firmly in neutral territory.

    Monetary policy and the slope of the Phillips curve

    The slope of the Phillips curve has first-order implications for the conduct of monetary policy.

    If the curve is steep, as it appeared to be in recent years, monetary policy is highly effective in reducing inflation, with only a limited impact on growth and employment. The smaller “sacrifice ratio” suggests that central banks should react more forcefully to deviations of inflation from target, even when the economy is hit by a supply shock that pushes inflation up and output down.[4]

    A steep Phillips curve hence improves the trade-off facing central banks, weakening the case for “looking through”, as forceful policy action minimises the risks of inflation expectations unanchoring and of inflation becoming entrenched.[5]

    Policy prescriptions differ fundamentally if the Phillips curve is flat.

    In this case, a large policy impulse is required to move output sufficiently to generate aggregate price effects. It can then be optimal for policy to tolerate moderate deviations of inflation from target, as the cost of closing a small inflation gap relative to the target may exceed the benefits.

    This prescription holds in both directions.

    When inflation is above the target, a flat Phillips curve would require a sharp rise in policy rates to bring medium-term inflation down from, say, 2.3% to 2%. Such a course of action may imply a substantial rise in unemployment and may thus not be welfare-improving for society at large – a trade-off central banks may face during the last mile of disinflation.[6]

    The experience of the 2010s, when inflation was persistently below the target, demonstrates that the argument also holds in the opposite direction.

    If bringing inflation up from 1.7% to 2%, for example, requires purchasing a large fraction of outstanding government bonds and making potentially time-inconsistent promises about the future path of interest rates, then the central bank must consider carefully whether the benefits outweigh the costs, such as making losses in the future, market dysfunction, rising wealth inequality, financial instability and threats to its reputation.[7]

    The role of inflation expectations

    However, the ability to tolerate moderate deviations of inflation from target critically hinges on a firm anchoring of inflation expectations – that is, a low sensitivity of inflation expectations to realised inflation.

    If inflation expectations are well-anchored, policymakers can tolerate moderate deviations from target, as fluctuations in inflation tend to fade away. If, however, inflation expectations are at risk of unanchoring, central banks should act forcefully.[8]

    There are two challenges to this strategy.

    One is that the anchoring of inflation expectations is endogenous. Central banks themselves can cause an unanchoring if inaction in the face of price shocks is perceived as weakening its commitment to securing price stability.[9]

    History shows that it can be costly to reestablish the credibility of the nominal anchor once it has been lost. This is also because inflation expectations are path-dependent. Research shows that the experience of high inflation may raise the sensitivity of inflation expectations to new inflation surprises.[10]

    The other challenge is that different measures of inflation expectations often yield different results (Slide 3). As such, robust trends cannot easily be identified in real time, much like the slope of the Phillips curve.[11]

    Measures of inflation expectations can even point in opposite directions. Research from the early days of the pandemic showed that most consumers expected the pandemic to raise prices, contrary to the views held by professional forecasters at the time.[12]

    State-dependent pricing and tight labour markets can explain steeper Phillips curve and post-pandemic inflation surge

    The recent period of high inflation illustrates how sensitive policy conclusions can be to the assessment of the slope of the Phillips curve and to measures of inflation expectations that central banks use in their analysis.

    Two key theories have been proposed to explain the post-pandemic inflation surge.[13]

    The first relates to firms’ price-setting behaviour.

    Standard New Keynesian models assume that the probability of firms resetting their prices is constant over time. This is a fair description of aggregate price movements when inflation is low and aggregate shocks are small (Slide 4).

    However, the past few years have demonstrated that this “linear” relationship breaks down in the face of large shocks.[14] When marginal costs increase rapidly and threaten to erode profit margins, firms tend to raise their prices more frequently. As a result, the Phillips curve steepens.

    This feedback loop is strongly asymmetric.[15] It acts as an inflation accelerator when firms face positive demand or adverse cost-push shocks.[16] But it does little to firms’ pricing strategies in the face of disinflationary shocks due to downward price rigidities.

    This helps explain why inflation did not fall much when the pandemic broke out but increased sharply after the reopening of our economies (Slide 5).[17]

    The second theory relates to the tightness of the labour market.

    Downward nominal wage rigidity has been a key factor explaining the “missing deflation” in the aftermath of the global financial crisis.[18] If nominal wages do not fall, or fall only very slowly, firms’ marginal costs change only moderately, and hence disinflationary pressures face a natural lower bound, even if slack is large.

    But when the labour market is tight, wages are more flexible as firms outbid each other in securing their desired workforce.

    Benigno and Eggertsson show that this channel led to a non-linear inflation surge in the United States whenever the number of job vacancies exceeded the number of unemployed workers (Slide 6).[19] In the euro area, the threshold was lower, but the curve still exhibited strong signs of non-linearity.

    Rising near-term inflation expectations may have shifted the Phillips curve up

    New research for the United States, however, suggests that the evidence in favour of the second theory is not very robust.

    Specifically, the finding of non-linearity depends critically on which measure is used to control for inflation expectations: non-linearity holds when controlling for expectations of professional forecasters, but it disappears once inflation expectations of households and firms are considered.[20]

    In other words, it is conceivable that the Phillips curve did not become steeper but rather shifted upwards as inflation expectations rose.[21] Non-linearity has also been rejected recently using a similar approach based on regional data for the euro area.[22]

    Moreover, the expectations that are relevant for such an upward shift are not necessarily the longer-term expectations that central banks typically pay most attention to.

    These have remained remarkably stable over the past few years (Slide 7).

    Rather, inflation expectations over the near term, such as the next 12 months, may be more important in driving macroeconomic outcomes.

    Bernanke and Blanchard, for example, show that one-year-ahead inflation expectations explain a significant share of the recent marked rise in nominal wages, and hence inflation, in the United States.[23] Similar evidence has been found for the euro area and other advanced economies.[24]

    Again, there appears to be an asymmetry: the risks that the Phillips curve shifts downwards are substantially lower. Research shows that consumers tend to respond more to inflationary than disinflationary news, as households value increases in their purchasing power and as they pay less attention to inflation when it is low.[25]

    The impact of tariffs on inflation in the euro area

    Understanding the reasons behind the recent inflation surge is not only important from a conceptual perspective. It also matters for setting monetary policy today, as we are once again confronted with historically large shocks.

    For central banks, this is a difficult environment to navigate.

    Memories of high inflation are still fresh after a long period of sharply rising prices. And just as during the pandemic, there is considerable uncertainty about how firms and households are going to respond to shocks that are largely outside the historical empirical range.

    Ultimately, the impact of current shocks on prices and wages, and hence the appropriate monetary policy response, will depend on the shape and location of the Phillips curve.

    Monetary policy should focus on the medium term and underlying inflation

    Let me illustrate this by looking at the euro area.

    Given the lags in policy transmission, the relevant horizon for monetary policy is the medium term. The past few years, however, demonstrated that inflation forecasting at times of large structural shocks is inherently difficult and plagued by large uncertainty.

    For this reason, the ECB and other central banks have increasingly turned to a data-dependent approach to monetary policy, where the observed dynamics of underlying inflation and the strength of monetary transmission are used to cross-check the inflation projections.[26]

    This approach remains valid today.[27] But data dependence is not in contrast to being forward-looking.

    In the current situation, the high level of economic uncertainty, together with the sharp fall in energy prices and a stronger euro exchange rate, will likely dampen headline inflation in the short run, potentially pushing it below our 2% target.

    The question is whether these developments provide meaningful signals about the net impact of current shocks on medium-term inflation.

    During the pandemic, for example, a strong appreciation of the euro against the US dollar, by nearly 14% over seven months, and a marked decline in energy prices were followed by a historical inflation surge.

    Data dependency hence requires examining the potential channels through which current shocks could affect underlying inflation over the medium term.

    In the euro area, there are two main forces that could have the size and persistence to pull underlying inflation sustainably away from our 2% medium-term target.

    One is fiscal policy, which is set to expand on a scale unseen outside periods of deep economic contraction.

    Germany has eased its constitutional debt brake for defence-related spending, and has committed to spending €500 billion, or more than 10% of GDP, on infrastructure and the green transition over the next 12 years. In addition, the European Commission has invited Member States to activate the national escape clause to accommodate increased defence expenditure across the EU.

    The impact of these measures on inflation will depend on how they are implemented, especially their impact on the supply side of the economy. But on balance, the fiscal impulse is likely to put upward pressure on underlying inflation over the medium term.

    Global fragmentation is the second force that could have a lasting impact on prices and wages.

    As we speak, the scale and scope of tariffs, the extent of retaliation as well as how financial markets respond to these developments all remain highly uncertain.

    Ongoing negotiations are a sign that mutually beneficial agreements may still be reached. An ideal outcome – the “zero-for-zero” tariff agreement advocated by the European Commission – could even boost growth and employment on both sides of the Atlantic.

    However, should these negotiations fail, the euro area will simultaneously face adverse supply and demand shocks, as the EU has announced that it will retaliate against higher tariffs.

    Similar to the pandemic, assessing the relative strength of these forces is inherently difficult. Overall, however, there are risks that a lasting and meaningful increase in tariffs will reinforce the upward pressure on underlying inflation arising from higher fiscal spending over the medium term.

    To see this, it is useful to look at the factors driving the macroeconomic propagation of tariffs.

    Euro area foreign demand may prove resilient, with limited effects on inflation

    The severity of the negative demand shock will depend on two factors.

    One is the hit to economic activity in the United States and to global demand from raising tariffs across the board. Under the 2 April tariff rates, the United States will face a supply shock of historic proportions. Inflation is poised to rise, real incomes to fall and unemployment to increase. Retaliatory tariffs would weaken the economy further.

    So even in the absence of demand reallocation, foreign demand can be expected to decline if there is a broad increase in tariffs. The depth and persistence of this decline will also depend on other policies, such as tax and spending cuts and deregulation.

    And it will crucially depend on the final outcome of tariff negotiations, which is likely to be far less severe than the 2 April announcement.

    The second factor affecting the severity of the demand shock relates to the degree of demand reallocation – that is, the elasticity of substitution between foreign and domestic products. This elasticity is highly uncertain and varies across industries, products and countries.[28]

    However, a robust finding in the literature is that products that are more differentiated tend to be relatively price-inelastic, as they are more difficult to substitute.

    This has great relevance for the euro area, where the bulk of exports to the United States comprise pharmaceuticals, machinery, vehicles and chemicals. These goods are typically highly differentiated (Slide 8, left-hand side).

    For instance, the supply of machines for producing semiconductors is basically monopolised by one Dutch company. Similarly, banknotes in the United States are overwhelmingly printed using machinery from a single German manufacturer.

    These and other machines are not easy to replace in the short run, giving euro area exporters leverage to pass higher costs on to foreign importers and limiting the hit to foreign demand.

    In addition, trade diversion may benefit euro area exports.

    Should prohibitive tariffs on Chinese imports remain in place, they will measurably raise the euro area’s price competitiveness in the US market. This can be expected to stimulate demand for euro area goods if there are no alternatives in the United States itself, especially as the number of industries in which both Chinese and euro area firms have comparative advantages has increased measurably over the past two decades (Slide 8, right-hand side).[29]

    New research corroborates this view.[30] It finds that the euro area stands to win in relative terms from a global trade war, as its net exports to the world will rise rather than fall as global demand is reallocated across the global network, offsetting the hit to domestic consumption.[31]

    In other words, for as long as tariffs are not prohibitive to trade and the uncertainty paralysing activity fades, aggregate euro area foreign demand may prove relatively resilient under a range of potential tariff outcomes.

    The recent appreciation of the euro does not refute this view.

    The euro has gone through two distinct phases since the US presidential election in November last year. It first depreciated in nominal effective terms by 3% until mid-February, before starting to appreciate. So, in net terms, the euro is trading just 2.6% above last year’s average.

    In addition, as most exports to the United States are invoiced in US dollars, the pass-through of changes in the exchange rate to import prices tends to be moderate – by recent estimates just about one-fifth.[32] And potential losses in price competitiveness in third countries are in part compensated by lower import costs, as euro area exports have, on average, a large import content.

    This price inelasticity is also reflected in recent surveys, with manufacturing firms reporting an expansion in output for the first time in more than two years (Slide 9). Also, fewer firms are reporting falling export orders.

    Even if part of these developments may reflect frontloading by firms, it is remarkable how resilient sentiment has remained in the face of the extraordinary increase in economic uncertainty.

    Supply shock puts upward pressure on inflation, reinforced by global supply chains

    The downward effects on inflation caused by lower demand are likely to be offset, partly or even fully, by the supply shock hitting the euro area through retaliatory tariffs imposed by the EU and other economies.

    The strength of this supply shock also depends on two factors.

    One is the extent to which firms pass higher tariffs on to consumers.

    In the United States, evidence from the 2018 tariff increase suggests that, in most cases, the pass-through to import prices was de facto complete.[33] At the same time, many firms chose to absorb part of the increase in import prices in their profit margins, thereby limiting the increase in consumer price inflation, at least in the short run.[34]

    Whether firms will respond similarly to a renewed rise in tariffs in the current environment is uncertain.

    On the one hand, the recent appreciation of the euro, if persistent, provides some margin for euro area firms to buffer cost increases from retaliatory tariffs. On the other hand, profit margins have already been squeezed by high wage growth and a sluggish economy, and the post-pandemic inflation surge may have lowered the bar for firms to pass higher costs on to consumers.

    Overall, recent surveys of companies in the United States and the euro area suggest that they plan to gradually pass higher tariffs on to consumers over the coming years.[35]

    In addition, in order to compensate for the hit to input costs, firms also tend to raise the prices of goods not directly affected by tariffs. There is evidence that retailers broadly adjust price markups even if only a subset of wholesale prices change.[36]

    The second, and related, factor determining the strength of the supply shock relates to global value chains.

    Unlike during the wave of protectionism in the 1930s, today the dominant share of international trade, about 70%, reflects multinational firms distributing production across countries and along the value chain to minimise costs. In this process, parts and components often cross borders many times.

    Prohibitive tariffs between the United States and China are already disrupting supply chains. Shipments of goods are declining, potentially causing future shortages of critical intermediate goods that could reverberate across the world.

    While current conditions are very different from those seen during the pandemic, when supply chain disruptions were a main factor driving the surge in inflation, the impact of tariffs is likely to be amplified as the increase in firms’ marginal costs propagates through the production network.

    ECB staff analysis shows that, even if the EU does not retaliate, higher production costs transmitted through global value chains could more than offset the disinflationary pressure coming from lower foreign demand, making tariffs inflationary overall (Slide 10, left-hand side).[37]

    These effects will become stronger with full retaliation, including intermediate goods. So far, the EU’s retaliatory measures have disproportionately targeted final consumer goods, such as beverages, food and home appliances – precisely to avoid broader cost effects being transmitted through value chains (Slide 10, right-hand side).

    But if the trade conflict intensifies, the scale of retaliation will widen and increasingly include intermediate goods, as these account for nearly 70% of euro area imports from the United States.

    In other words, retaliatory tariffs on intermediate goods would constitute a much broader cost-push shock for euro area firms, reminiscent of the post-pandemic supply chain disruptions.[38]

    It is possible that these effects will be mitigated by China redirecting goods originally destined for the United States towards the euro area and other economies at a discount.

    In practice, however, this mitigation channel is likely to be contained. India, for example, has already raised temporary tariffs on China to curb a surge in imports. Similarly, the European Commission has repeatedly clarified that it intends to protect euro area firms against dumping prices should imports from China rise significantly in response to the evolving trade conflict with the United States.[39]

    Policy implications

    How, then, should the ECB respond to the current shocks?

    The lessons from the post-pandemic surge in inflation suggest that, from today’s perspective, the appropriate course of action is to keep rates close to where they are today – that is, firmly in neutral territory.

    A “steady hand” policy provides the best insurance against a wide range of potential outcomes. In other words, it is robust to many contingencies.

    Specifically, it avoids reacting excessively to volatility in headline inflation at a time when domestic inflation remains sticky and new forces are putting upward pressure on underlying inflation over the medium term. Given lags in policy transmission, an accommodative policy stance could amplify risks to medium-term price stability.

    This steady hand policy also avoids overreacting to concerns that tariffs may destabilise inflation expectations once again.

    In recent months, households’ short-term inflation expectations have reversed and started rising again. According to the ECB’s Consumer Expectations Survey, expectations for inflation one year ahead increased to 2.9% in March from their trough of 2.4% in September 2024 (Slide 11, left-hand side). Qualitative inflation expectations, as measured by the European Commission, even rose to levels last seen in late 2022 (Slide 11, right-hand side).

    Currently, there are no indications that this rise is persistent, or that inflation expectations are at risk of unanchoring.

    Hence, we can afford to look through the rise in short-term inflation expectations. This could change if we see clear signs of a strong and front-loaded pass-through of potential tariff increases – something that could bring us back to the steep part of the Phillips curve. So far, however, evidence suggests that firms have notably slowed the frequency with which they revise their prices.

    A steady hand policy also addresses risks of a more substantial decline in aggregate demand in response to the trade conflict.

    If tight labour markets were the main culprit for the recent steepening of the Phillips curve, risks of a sharp decline in inflation caused by a rise in unemployment are much more moderate today.

    The reason for this is that in both the United States and the euro area, the vacancy-to-unemployment ratio has fallen markedly and is now at a level that suggests that labour markets are much more balanced (Slide 12).

    We are thus likely to be operating close to, or at, the flat part of the Phillips curve where a change in unemployment has only limited effects on underlying inflation, in stark contrast to the high inflation period.[40]

    We would only need to react more forcefully to the tariff shock if we observed a sharp deterioration in labour market conditions or an unanchoring of inflation expectations to the downside.

    Both seem unlikely at the current juncture.

    Despite the number of vacancies declining, the euro area labour market has proven resilient, with unemployment at a record low. And most measures of medium-term inflation expectations remain tilted to the upside, including those of professional forecasters (Slide 13).

    Conclusion

    My main message today, and with this I would like to conclude, is therefore simple: now is the time to keep a steady hand.

    In the current environment of elevated volatility, the ECB needs to remain focused on the medium term. Given long and variable transmission lags, reacting to short-term developments could result in the peak impact of our policy only unfolding when the current disinflationary forces have passed.

    Over the medium term, risks to euro area inflation are likely tilted to the upside, reflecting both the increase in fiscal spending and the risks of renewed cost-push shocks from tariffs propagating through global value chains.

    Therefore, from today’s perspective, an accommodative monetary policy stance would be inappropriate, also because recent inflation data suggest that past shocks may unwind more slowly than previously anticipated.

    By keeping interest rates near their current levels, we can be confident that monetary policy is neither excessively holding back growth and employment, nor stimulating it. We are thus in a good place to evaluate the likely future evolution of the economy and to take action if risks materialise that threaten price stability.

    Thank you.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI USA: 28 DEMOCRATS URGE PRESIDENT TRUMP TO CALL ON NETANYAHU TO ADDRESS HUMANITARIAN CRISIS IN GAZA

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Brad Schneider (D-IL)

    WASHINGTON – Rep. Brad Schneider (IL-10), a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee and co-chair of Abraham Accords Caucus, led 27 fellow House Democrats on a letter to President Trump urging him to call on Prime Minister Netanyahu to immediately restore the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza. 

    The letter notes Israel is fighting an existential war. “Israel has the right and obligation to defeat Hamas and rescue the hostages,” the members wrote. “At the same time, it is critical that Israel enables entry of lifesaving humanitarian aid into Gaza. We respectfully urge you to call on Prime Minister Netanyahu to immediately address this humanitarian crisis and promote lasting peace”

    “There will not be peace as long as Hamas reigns terror over Gaza and seeks to destroy Israel,” added Rep. Schneider. “As Israel works to defeat and dismantle Hamas, it must also facilitate the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Just as it is crucial for food, water, and medicines to get to civilians, it is imperative that Hamas, and gangs affiliated with Hamas, are not allowed to hijack future aid entering the Strip.” 

    Members who signed the letter include Reps. Wesley Bell (MO-01), Nikki Budzinski (IL-13), Gilbert Cisneros (CA-31), Steve Cohen (TN-07), Angie Craig (MN-02), Danny Davis (IL-07), Sarah Elfreth (MD-03), Laura Friedman (CA-30), Steny Hoyer (MD-05), Jonathan Jackson (IL-01), Sydney Kamlager-Dove (CA-37), Robin Kelly (IL-02), George Latimer (NY-16), John Mannion (NY-22), Seth Magaziner (RI-02), April McClain Delaney (MD-06), Kristen McDonald Rivet (MI-08), Kelly Morrison (MN-03), Frank Mrvan (IN-01), Johnny Olszewski (MD-02), Jimmy Panetta (CA-19), Chris Pappas (NH-01), Brittany Petterson (CO-07), Kim Schrier (WA-08), Greg Stanton (AZ-04), Marilyn Strickland (WA-10), and Eugene Vindman (VA-07).

    The full letter text is below.

    Dear President Trump: 

    On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a brutal and unprovoked war on Israel, murdering civilians and kidnapping hundreds of hostages. More than 40 Americans were killed, 13 were taken hostage, and five still remain unaccounted for. Presently, 59 hostages are still held in Gaza, of which 24 are presumed living and languishing in Hamas’s tunnels, enduring unspeakable abuse and terror. 

    Israel has the right and obligation to defeat Hamas and rescue the hostages. At the same time, it is critical that Israel enables entry of lifesaving humanitarian aid into Gaza. We respectfully urge you to call on Prime Minister Netanyahu to immediately address this humanitarian crisis and promote lasting peace.  

    You recently highlighted the ongoing humanitarian suffering in Gaza, where Hamas uses Palestinian civilians as human shields. We appreciate your recognition of the urgent need for food, water, and medicine to reach civilians — and we agree. The World Food Program recently announced that its warehouses are now empty, and many civilians are suffering from lack of access to food and clean water. It is vital for humanitarian assistance to again get to those in need, even amid the ongoing conflict. We also urge you to keep your recent commitment “to help the people of Gaza get some food.” 

    We recognize that restoring humanitarian aid must coexist with the campaign to return the hostages and defeat Hamas. Failing to ensure aid reaches civilians risks greater humanitarian catastrophe, strengthens Hamas’s false narratives, risks Israel’s international standing, and undermines the moral clarity of the need to dismantle Hamas and bring hopes for peace and prosperity to the region. The United States must both stand with our allies and uphold our values, including protecting civilian life. Ensuring the safe and sustained delivery of humanitarian aid, while continuing to stand shoulder to shoulder with Israel in its fight against terrorism, is essential to returning the hostages while preserving our shared commitment to security, justice, and human dignity.  

    We respectfully urge you to continue speaking out about the importance of restoring humanitarian assistance and to encourage Prime Minister Netanyahu to enable the delivery of life-saving food, water, and medicine to civilians in Gaza without delay. Your leadership at this critical moment can help save lives, reinforce America’s steadfast support for both our values and our allies, and support Israel’s vital mission to dismantle Hamas and bring every hostage home. 

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Letter Calls on FCC Chairman Brendan Carr to Modernize Federal Broadcast Ownership Rules

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND)
    Modernization of regulations will strengthen local journalism, enhance public interest, and ensure broadcasters can compete in a digital age
    BISMARCK, N.D. – Despite the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) making modest adjustments to its broadcast ownership rules, the regulations remain nearly the same as they were in the 1990s. The minimal changes implemented since then fail to account for the rise of digital platforms, social media, streaming services, and smartphones.
    Local broadcasters are a trusted source for credible reporting, yet they face outdated ownership restrictions. U.S. Senator Kevin Cramer (R-ND) joined U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS) in sending a letter to FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, requesting the agency modernize its broadcast ownership rules to enable local broadcasters to compete with today’s giant media conglomerates. The letter echoes Chairman Carr’s characterization of the failure to modernize regulations as a “break glass moment” for local media.
    Specifically, the letter calls on the FCC to repeal the national audience reach cap, update local television (TV) ownership limits, and modernize local radio station sub-caps. The FCC’s national audience reach cap limits a single entity’s ability to own TV stations, which collectively reach more than 39% of U.S. TV households. Another regulation imposed by the agency, known as the “Top 4” rule, also restricts the number of big four broadcast TV networks a company can own. This rule applies to ABC, CBS, Fox, and NBC. 
    The FCC’s arcane local radio ownership sub-caps limit the number of stations an organization can own per market based on the total number of stations within the market. In a radio market with more than 45 stations, an entity may own up to eight radio stations. No more than five of the stations can be in the same service (AM or FM). 
    “The fast-evolving media marketplace has made broadcast ownership regulations in urgent need of modernization,” wrote the senators. “Local broadcasters now vie for audience, content, and advertising not just with each other, but with the world’s largest tech companies. The regulations, designed for a bygone era, no longer reflect this reality.”
    In the letter, the senators state it is “time for swift FCC action to level the playing field for local broadcasters by modernizing the broadcast ownership rules.”
    “Without the opportunity to combine or expand operations, broadcasters struggle to invest in journalism, retain sufficient newsroom staff, and strain to compete against their unregulated global Big Tech competitors,” concluded the senators. “By modernizing broadcast ownership restrictions, the FCC can empower broadcasters to fulfill their essential role in American democracy, foster local journalism, and benefit local communities […] Updating these rules will strengthen local journalism, enhance public interest, and ensure broadcasters can compete in a digital age, not just survive it.”
    Members who cosigned the letter include U.S. Senators John Barrasso (R-WY), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), John Boozman (R-AR), Ted Budd (R-NC), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Susan Collins (R-ME), John Cornyn (R-TX), John Curtis (R-UT), Steve Daines (R-MT), Joni Ernst (R-IA), Chuck Grassley (R-IA), John Hoeven (R-ND), James Lankford (R-OK), Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), Pete Ricketts (R-NE), Tim Scott (R-SC), Tim Sheehy (R-MT), Dan Sullivan (R-AK), Tommy Tuberville (R-AL), and Todd Young (R-IN).
    Click here for the letter.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ranking Member Markey Hosts Virtual Discussion with Small Business Owners on the Impacts of Trump’s Tariffs

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey
    Washington (May 8, 2025) – Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee Ranking Member Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) today held a virtual listening session with small business owners in Massachusetts and small business owners who serve the Commonwealth on the devastating impacts the Trump Tariffs are having on them.
    “Small businesses are the backbone of the American economy, but to small business owners, Trump’s Tariffs are back breaking. Trump’s Tariffs have cost small businesses more than $9,000 every second since he announced his chaotic, reckless policy. This administration is only working to protect the interest of big businesses, telling small businesses to ‘wait it out.’ This is unacceptable. Small businesses live day to day, week to week, or even month to month. They cannot afford to wait and see what happens in Washington – their livelihoods and communities depend on their ability to operate. That is why I introduced the Small Business Liberation Act. This bill would provide small businesses with the relief they need. This should not be a partisan issue, and I will continue to fight to pass this legislation,” said Ranking Member Markey.
    “I operate a USA based manufacturing business where our raw materials – green coffee – literally cannot be produced in the US, yet we are still subject to tariffs. These additional taxes (which is effectively what they are) are sending shockwaves through an industry that was already facing record high prices. We have no other choice but to raise our prices and pass some of these costs to our consumers.  But of course there is a ceiling to what people can and will pay for coffee, so we risk alienating our customer base, driving them back to the bigger businesses, like Starbucks and Dunkin Donuts, and contributing to continued inflationary economy.  The choices are terrible,” said Shayna Ferullo, Owner of Snowy Owl Coffee Roasters.
    “These aren’t luxury items for us. They’re the foundation of what we do — and when prices double, so do the barriers to growth, opportunity, and community impact. When costs go up and margins shrink, it’s not just our business that feels it — it’s the people we’re training, the clients we serve, and the communities we’re trying to uplift. Before policies are passed, we’re simply asking for a seat at the table — because decisions made at the top are felt most by businesses at the street level,” said Steeve Louis-Charles, Co-founder of Boston Pro Sound.
    “I will run out of inventory in less than 2-3 months.  I can no longer afford to bring my products into the USA.  If I can’t figure something out quickly, I will have to shut down my business.  I will no longer have revenue to pay my employees, bills, vendors, and loans.  I will lose my home.  Small, American-owned businesses need immediate relief from tariffs,” said Beth Benike, Founder of Busy Baby.
    “My lease needs to be renewed and given the uncertainty around the new tariffs, I don’t know if I can afford to stay open unless I shift to an entirely new financial model. In less than two weeks we will have to make a decision on the future of our company that could lock at least 100 people back into a cycle of generational poverty,” said Brandale Randolph, Founder of 1854 Cycling Company.
    “As a small, fourth-generation, family-owned business founded on the ‘American Dream,’ we fully support bringing businesses back to the United States. However, handcuffing us with increased costs and decreased availability on products that are necessary for our success, is making us less competitive, not more competitive,” said Zack Rocheleau, Supply Chain Manager, Rocheleau Tool & Die.
    “Today, Main Street Alliance members Beth Benike of Busy Baby, Jen Faigel of the Commonwealth Kitchen, and Shayna Ferullo of Snowy Owl shared their personal stories with Sen. Markey about the impact of the Trump Tariffs. Without small business relief, shelves are going to go empty and entrepreneurs will go bankrupt. That’s why MSA strongly supports Sen. Markey’s ‘Small Business Liberation Act’ and urges members of the US Senate to co-sponsor this essential legislation,” said Shawn Phetteplace, National Campaigns Director, Main Street Alliance.
    “The Black Economic Council of Massachusetts (BECMA) is incredibly grateful to Senator Markey and his team for hosting a listening session that explored the impact federal trade policies are having on small businesses. Brandale Randolph of 1854 Cycling and Steeve Louis-Charles of Boston Professional Sound Inc., BECMA members, were able to share how detrimental tariffs and the subsequent supply chain challenges already have been to their businesses. Small business is the backbone of the Massachusetts economy, and we will continue to advocate for policies that will positively impact small business growth and sustainability,” said Nicole Obi, President & CEO of BECMA.
    “The tariffs are a nightmare for our small business community, including the farms, food trucks, caterers, product companies, and restaurants we represent and work with. Small businesses, unlike large businesses, don’t have teams of lobbyists nor safety nets underneath us. We are already seeing a domino effect on an awful lot of people that will be hurt: when our businesses go down, the insurance brokers go down, the drivers go down, the distributors go down, and the marketing teams go down,” said Jen Faigel, co-founder and Executive Director of CommonWealth Kitchen. 
    This week, Ranking Member Markey, Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI) introduced the Small Business Liberation Act, legislation that would exempt small businesses from the broad, global tariffs imposed as a result of the national emergency declared on April 2, 2025, by President Trump. The Small Business Liberation Act gives the more than 34 million U.S. small businesses needed relief from the overly broad, reckless Trump Tariffs that are wreaking havoc on their businesses.
    Ranking Member Markey recently wrote to Small Business Administrator Loeffler, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, calling on the Trump administration to exempt U.S. small businesses from the reckless Trump Tariffs, and afford them the same relief that the administration is giving billion-dollar tech giants such as Apple and Google.
    Previously, Ranking Member Markey, along with Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), and all Democrats on the Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee wrote to Administrator Loeffler, urging her to take immediate action to address the impacts of Trump’s reckless tariff policies on small businesses.
    In April 2025, Ranking Member Markey released a report, “The Trump Tariffs: A Small Business Crisis,” which details the disastrous impacts of Trump’s tariff policies on small businesses across the country.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Markey Joins Colleagues to Call on Trump Administration to Reverse Plans to Eliminate Consumer Product Safety Commission

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey
    “Without the dedicated oversight of the CPSC, American families, especially children, will be left vulnerable in their own homes.”
    Washington (May 8, 2025) – Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) joined Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Representatives Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) and Kevin Mullin (D-CA) along with 20 members of the Senate and 27 members of the House in calling on Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought to reverse plans to eliminate the bipartisan, independent Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). The CPSC is the only government entity tasked with developing and enforcing product safety standards, facilitating recalls of unsafe products, and educating consumers and businesses about product hazards and best practices. The proposal to absorb some of CPSC’s core functions into a nonexistent division within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), as HHS’ budget is being cut, is unrealistic and threatens public safety.
    “Since its inception, the CPSC has played a vital role safeguarding American families, and in particular infants, children, and older Americans. Thanks to the CPSC’s critical work, residential fires and fire-related deaths have decreased by over 40 percent. Crib deaths and child poisonings have dropped by 80 percent. The Commission’s work continues today, identifying emerging threats and protecting Americans from dangerous and banned imported products,” the Members wrote.
    The Members continued, “With the rapid growth of e-commerce and imported consumer products, especially from countries with less stringent safety regulations, CPSC plays a critical role to prevent unsafe and counterfeit goods from entering the U.S. market unchecked.”
    “We strongly oppose any attempt to eliminate, defund, or weaken the CPSC and demand that you immediately roll back any efforts to dissolve the agency. Americans rightfully expect that the products they bring into their home are safe, and only the CPSC has the authority and expertise to ensure that expectation is met,” the Members concluded.
    The letter comes as more than 150 consumer protection and trade groups warned that eliminating the CPSC would undermine product safety, weaken enforcement actions, consumer education campaigns, and data collection initiatives that protect Americans.
    Senators Amby Klobuchar (D-MN), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Tammy Baldwin (D-MN), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Ben Ray Luján (D-NM), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Peter Welch (D-VT), Angus King (I-ME), Brian Schatz (D-HI), Ron Wyden (D-WA), Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Jack Reed (D-RI), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and Martin Heinrich (D-MN) signed onto the letter.
    Representatives Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC), Kim Schrier, M.D. (D-WA), Julia Brownley (D-CA), Al Green (D-TX), Danny Davis (D-IL), Frederica S. Wilson (D-FL), Emanuel Cleaver, II (D-MO), Paul D. Tonko (D-NY), Jonathan L. Jackson (D-IL), Delia C. Ramirez (D-IL), Rick Larson (D-CT), Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), Pramila Jayapal (D-WA), Lori Trahan (D-MA), Kathy Castor (D-FL), Jamie Raskin (D-MD), Ritchie Torres (D-NY), Diana DeGette (D-CO), Rashida Talib (D-MI), Troy A. Carter, Sr. (D-LA), Darren Soto (D-FL), Robin L. Kelly (D-IL), Nydia M. Velázquez (D-NY), Suhas Subramanyam (D-VA), André Carson (D-IN), Becca Balint (D-WA), and J. Luis Correa (D-CA) also joined the letter.
    The full text of the letter is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: During National Small Business Week, Ranking Member Markey Convenes Field Hearing, Releases Report Detailing Trump Assault on Small Businesses and the Clean Energy Economy

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Massachusetts Ed Markey
    REPORT: Pulling the Plug: How Trump’s Attacks on Clean Energy Could Turn out the Lights for Small Business
    Boston (May 9, 2025) – During National Small Business Week, Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee Ranking Member Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) today led a field hearing in Boston with Massachusetts clean energy leaders to examine the role that small businesses play in the clean energy economy, the importance of continuing federal investments that support the clean energy transition, and the impacts of tariffs from Trump’s chaotic trade war on small businesses.
    Ranking Member Markey also released a report titled “Pulling the Plug: How Trump’s Attacks on Clean Energy Could Turn out the Lights for Small Business,” which details how federal investments support clean energy small businesses, and how the Trump administration’s efforts to roll back federal clean energy investments, especially those created and expanded by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), will devastate small businesses in the clean energy economy.
    “Clean energy is one of the fastest growing industries in the United States, and Massachusetts is leading the way,” said Ranking Member Markey. “In our state, the clean energy economy supports more than 100,000 direct jobs. Our clean energy transition isn’t just about mitigating the devastating impacts of the climate crisis—it is about building an economy with accessible, good-paying jobs, and it is about centering justice. I convened today’s field hearing with Massachusetts clean energy leaders and released my report because our path to a just, livable future for all runs through small businesses.”
    Key findings from Ranking Member Markey’s report include:
    Small businesses account for a significant portion of clean energy jobs in the United States, with 75 percent of energy efficiency workers employed by companies with 20 or fewer employees. 
    In Massachusetts, there are more than 100,000 direct clean energy jobs. More than half of the 7,300 clean energy businesses in the Commonwealth are small firms with 10 or fewer employees; more than 80 percent have fewer than 50 employees.
    The Trump administration is undercutting programs critical for small businesses, including freezing Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) funding, and reinstating caps on Small Business Administration (SBA) 504 Loans which finance improvements that reduce small business energy costs.
    The April 2025 Trump Tariffs limit deployment of clean energy, including solar, driving up costs for small- and mid-sized installers and making it harder for them to compete.
    Thousands of rural businesses completed clean energy projects expecting reimbursement through the Rural Energy for America Program (REAP) program, only to have their funding withheld.
    Firms surveyed in 2024 reported concerns they would lose business or be forced to close as a direct result of an IRA repeal.
    Repealing federal clean energy tax credits and funding could threaten or eliminate thousands of jobs and could cost the U.S. $160 billion in lost GDP.
    The Massachusetts clean energy leaders who joined Ranking Member Markey at today’s field hearing emphasized the importance of investing in small businesses and growing the clean energy economy.
    “With over 115,000 workers driving the growth of our clean energy sector, Massachusetts is proving that clean energy and economic growth go hand-in-hand. Small businesses are at the heart of this transformation—creating jobs, improving lives, and building a cleaner, more secure future,” said Dr. Emily Reichert, CEO of the Massachusetts Clean Energy Center. “By investing in small businesses and workforce development, we can ensure that Massachusetts remains a leader in climate innovation and continues to offer meaningful opportunities for all of our residents.”
    “We are already witnessing significant solar project delays and cancelations as a result of the uncertainty brought on by talk of tariffs and the possible repeal of tax credits,” said Nick d’Arbeloff, President of the Solar Energy Business Association of New England (SEBANE). “If the [Investment Tax Credit] is, in fact, eliminated and the tariffs move ahead as planned, more than a few of our small business member companies have indicated they will be forced to significantly reduce their workforce or close their doors entirely.”
    “Franklin Cummings Tech prepares graduates for well-paying, in-demand jobs by aligning the skills we teach with the immediate needs of the job market and society. The Center for Energy Efficiency and the Trades (CEET) is a perfect example of this model in action, bringing a focus on sustainability and renewable energy across the college’s technical programs. Our efforts received a tremendous boost when Senator Markey and Senator Warren facilitated the $800,000 grant to Franklin Cummings Tech through the Department of Labor, bringing greater resources and structure to the CEET program,” said Dr. Aisha Francis, President and CEO of Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology.
    “Small businesses are the backbone of America’s clean energy transformation. For small businesses nationwide, consistent policy support is essential; without it, we risk stalling the remarkable progress we’ve made in building America’s clean energy future. At SparkCharge, we see firsthand how federal initiatives empower innovation, create jobs, and drive sustainable growth. Clear policies and stable federal support ensure that American small businesses can lead the world in clean energy solutions, strengthening both our local communities here in Massachusetts and the broader economy across the United States,” said Josh Aviv, Founder and CEO of SparkCharge.
    During National Small Business Week, Ranking Member Markey, along with members of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship and Senate Democrats participated in several media opportunities to highlight the urgency of supporting U.S. small business owners and entrepreneurs in the face of Trump’s reckless tariff policies and continued chaos and cuts at the SBA.
    Yesterday, Ranking Member Markey held a virtual listening session with small business owners in Massachusetts and owners who serve the Commonwealth on the devastating impacts of the Trump Tariffs.
    Earlier this week, Ranking Member Markey, alongside Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Senator Mazie Hirono (D-HI) introduced the Small Business Liberation Act, legislation that would exempt the more than 34 million U.S. small businesses from the reckless Trump Tariffs that are wreaking havoc on their businesses and the U.S. economy.
    Ranking Member Markey recently wrote to Small Business Administrator Loeffler, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, calling on the Trump administration to exempt U.S. small businesses from the reckless Trump Tariffs and afford them the same relief that the administration is giving billion-dollar tech giants such as Apple and Google.
    Previously, Ranking Member Markey, along with Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and all Democrats on the Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee wrote to Administrator Loeffler, urging her to take immediate action to address the impacts of Trump’s reckless tariff policies on small businesses.
    Ranking Member Markey has been speaking out against Trump attacks to federal clean energy and climate funding and programs during Trump’s first 100 days in office. In February 2025, Ranking Member Markey was denied a meeting with EPA Administrator Zeldin and DOGE representatives, where the lawmakers planned to ask why funding to critical EPA programs was unconstitutionally cut off to communities. In March 2025, Ranking Member Markey and Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) led a letter to Administrator Lee Zeldin to cease its attempts to claw back nearly $20 billion in congressionally appropriated and legally obligated funding. In April 2025, Ranking Member Markey released a report, “The Trump Tariffs: A Small Business Crisis,” which details the disastrous impacts of Trump’s tariff policies on small businesses across the country.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Federal Grand Jury Indicts Essex County, New Jersey Man and Woman for Conspiracy to Commit Forced Labor; Man Also Charged with Sex Trafficking and Forced Labor

    Source: United States Attorneys General 12

    A federal grand jury in the District of New Jersey, returned an indictment on April 25 that was unsealed Wednesday, charging Treva Edwards, 60, with sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion and forced labor. The indictment also charged Treva Edwards and Christine Edwards, 63, with conspiracy to commit forced labor.

    According to the indictment, Treva and Christine Edwards were the founders and pastors of a church they named “Jesus is Lord by the Holy Ghost,” which they operated out of a multi-unit apartment building in Orange, New Jersey, and where they conspired with each other and others to obtain the compelled labor of church members.

    “The Department of Justice will not tolerate the exploitation of vulnerable individuals under the guise of faith or community,” said Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “This Civil Rights Division is committed to holding accountable those who abuse positions of trust to manipulate and control others for personal gain. These charges reflect our unwavering focus on protecting victims and prosecuting those who commit forced labor and sex trafficking.”

    “These charges are an example of my office’s tireless commitment to combatting human trafficking in our community,” said U.S. Attorney Alina Habba for the District of New Jersey. “If you engage in human trafficking, we will find you, and we will prosecute you. We are committed to working alongside our partners to ensure that those who target the most vulnerable are brought to justice.”

    “Treva and Christine Edwards turned a source of hope into a tool of fear by allegedly exploiting religious faith to manipulate victims and expose them to sexual violence and forced labor conditions,” said Special Agent in Charge Ricky J. Patel of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Newark Division. “Seeking justice for human trafficking victims in cases like this is of utmost importance to HSI Newark. Anyone who may believe they are a victim of trafficking can be assured our investigations are victim-centered and that we will continue to relentlessly pursue justice for anyone’s freedom that has been held ransom.”

    “An important part of the mission of the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General is to investigate allegations of labor trafficking involving the use of coercion or force,” said Special Agent in Charge Jonathan Mellone of the Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, Northeast Region. “We will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to investigate these types of allegations.”

    As charged in the indictment, between 2011 and 2020, the defendants identified and recruited victims who were facing struggles in their personal lives, including financial and familial struggles, to join the church and live and worship at the church building. Treva Edwards told the victims that he was a prophet who could communicate directly with God and that disobeying him would result in spiritual retribution from God, as well as physical, emotional, and financial harm.

    The defendants secured labor contracts to provide manual labor in and around Orange, New Jersey, and the defendants dispatched the victims to perform the contracted labor. The defendants did not pay wages to the victims for their work and kept the money earned from their labor.

    The defendants convinced the victims that they would lose favor with God if they did not perform labor. Treva Edwards spread fear among the victims through verbal and emotional abuse and threats of reputational harm, homelessness, hunger, spiritual retribution, punishments, and more hard labor to gain their obedience and compel them to perform unpaid labor. The defendants instituted and enforced strict rules about when and whether the victims could eat or sleep, when and for how long they were to pray and work, and whether they could speak to non-members or leave the church building. The defendants isolated the victims, monitored their communications and whereabouts, and by convincing them that non-members were evil or possessed by the devil. The defendants deprived the victims of sleep and typically fed them only once a day after they completed their work.

    Also according to the allegations in the indictment, Treva Edwards controlled and subjected one victim to repeated physical and sexual assaults, impregnated her, and instructed her to get an abortion.

    The defendants made their initial court appearances today before a U.S. Magistrate Judge André M. Espinosa. The charge of sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion against Treva Edwards carries a mandatory minimum penalty of 15 years in prison and a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The forced labor charge against Treva Edwards carries a maximum penalty of twenty years or life imprisonment if the violation included aggravated sexual abuse. The conspiracy to commit forced labor charge carries a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. There is no parole in the federal system.

    Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon of the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division and U.S. Attorney Alina Habba of the District of New Jersey credited special agents of Homeland Security Investigations Newark, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Ricky J. Patel and special agents of the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Inspector General, Northeast Region, under the direction of Special Agent in Charge Jonathan Mellone, with the investigation leading to this indictment.

    Assistant U.S. Attorneys Trevor Chenoweth and Susan Millenky for the District of New Jersey and Trial Attorney Francisco Zornosa of the Civil Rights Division’s Human Trafficking Prosecution Unit are prosecuting the case.

    HSI Newark is asking anyone with information about Treva Edwards, Christine Edwards, or their organization known as Jesus is Lord by the Holy Ghost (JLHG), to contact its tip line at (866) 347-2423 or email  HSINewarkHumanTrafficking@hsi.dhs.gov. The tip line is monitored 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. Additionally, there is an online tip form.

    If you or someone you know is a victim of human trafficking, please call the National Human Trafficking Hotline at 1 (888) 373-7888.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Rescission of Useless Water Pressure Standards

    Source: The White House

    MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY OF ENERGY
    THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR
    THE DEPUTY ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS

    SUBJECT:       Rescission of Useless Water Pressure Standards

    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct:

    Water conservation requirements for faucets, showers, bathtubs, and toilets — promulgated by the Department of Energy pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-486) — make bathroom appliances more expensive and less functional.  “Efficiency” standards render other American appliances like clothes washers and dishwashers less useful, more breakable, and more expensive to repair.  The Federal Government should not impose or enforce regulations that make taxpayers’ lives worse.

    To address these unnecessary radical green agenda policies, I direct the Secretary of Energy to consider using all lawful authority to rescind — or, as appropriate, amend to revert to the standards required by statute — the regulations found in 10 C.F.R. 430.32(f), relating to water and energy use in dishwashers; 10 C.F.R. 430.32(o), relating to water use in faucets; 10 C.F.R. 430.32(p), relating to water use in showerheads; 10 C.F.R. 430.32(q), relating to water use in water closets; 10 C.F.R. 430.32(r), relating to water use in urinals; the definitions of “automatic clothes washer,” “clothes washer,” “dishwasher,” “faucet,” “other clothes washer,” “semi-automatic clothes washer,” “urinal,” and “water closet” contained in 10 C.F.R. 430.2; the residential washing machine efficiency standards contained in 10 C.F.R. 430.32(g); and the commercial washing machine efficiency standards contained in 10 C.F.R. 431.156.

    Furthermore, I direct the Secretary of Energy to publish in the Federal Register a notice clarifying the Waiver of Federal Preemption of State regulations covered by the application of “Energy Efficiency Program for Consumer Products:  Waiver of Federal Preemption of State Regulations Concerning the Water Use or Water Efficiency of Showerheads, Faucets, Water Closets and Urinals,” 75 Fed. Reg. 80289 (December 22, 2010).

    I further direct the Secretary of Energy not to enforce any of the regulatory provisions listed in this memorandum, pending rescission or reversion of such provisions; the provisions of 42 U.S.C. 6295(j) and (k); or energy and water efficiency standards for washing machines, including the provisions in 42 U.S.C. 6295(g) and 42 U.S.C. 6313(e).

    Finally, I direct the Secretary of Energy and the Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Office of Legislative Affairs to jointly prepare and submit recommendations to the President, within 60 days of the date of this memorandum, through the Chair of the National Energy Dominance Council, for the Congress to rescind, insofar as each relates to the subject matter of this memorandum, 42 U.S.C. 6295(g), (j), (k), and (o) and 42 U.S.C. 6313(e), or to repeal the Energy Policy Act of 1992 in its entirety.

    This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

                                  DONALD J. TRUMP

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA News: Keeping Promises to Veterans and Establishing a National Center for Warrior Independence

    Source: The White House

    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:

    Section 1Purpose and Policy.  Our Nation’s security, prosperity, and freedom would not be possible without our veterans.  Many service members paid the ultimate sacrifice.  Many others bear visible and invisible wounds from their service.  Too many veterans are homeless in America.  Each veteran deserves our gratitude.

    Yet the Federal Government has not always treated veterans like the heroes they are.  During the previous administration, unaccountable bureaucrats treated them shamefully, failing veterans when they needed help most and betraying the taxpayers who rightfully expect better.

    The story of the West Los Angeles Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center is indicative of this failure.  More than one hundred years ago, Senator John Percival Jones and Arcadia Bandini de Stearns Baker generously donated hundreds of acres of land that they owned in West Los Angeles on the condition that it be used to house disabled veterans.  The campus once featured a chapel, billiard hall, 1,000-seat theater, and housed about 6,000 veterans, but the Federal Government has since allowed this crown jewel of veteran care to deteriorate over the last few decades.  

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (Department) leased parts of the property to a private school, private companies, and the baseball team of the University of California, Los Angeles, sometimes at significantly below-market prices.  As of 2024, there were approximately 3,000 homeless veterans in Los Angeles, more than in any other city in the country and accounting for about 10 percent of all of America’s homeless veterans.  Many of these heroes live in squalor in Los Angeles’s infamous “skid row.”

    During my first term, I signed legislation to increase accountability and expand benefits and choices for veterans in accessing care, and my second term will build on those efforts.  Accountability will return to the Department.  Veterans around the Nation will have more choices in care, benefits, and services.  The VA campus in West Los Angeles will become the National Center for Warrior Independence with facilities and resources to help our veterans earn back their self-sufficiency.

    Sec. 2Establishing the National Center for Warrior Independence.  The Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary) shall take all appropriate action to:

    (a)  designate a National Center for Warrior Independence on the West Los Angeles VA Campus in which homeless veterans in the Los Angeles metropolitan area and around the Nation can seek and receive the care, benefits, and services to which they are entitled;

    (b)  work with other municipalities and VA facilities to ensure that homeless veterans outside the Los Angeles metropolitan area who want to avail themselves of the National Center for Warrior Independence are provided the means to do so;

    (c)  in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, and the heads of any other relevant executive departments or agencies, ensure that funds that may have been spent on housing or other services for illegal aliens are redirected to construct, establish, and maintain this National Center for Warrior Independence;

    (d)  work to restore self-sufficiency and the warrior ethos among homeless veterans through any guidance, requirements, or services needed to ensure that homeless veterans can access housing, receive substance abuse or addiction treatment, and return to productive work and community engagement; and

    (e)  within 120 days of the date of this order, present an action plan to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, to meet these directives and restore the capacity to house up to 6,000 homeless veterans at the National Center for Warrior Independence by January 1, 2028.

    Sec. 3Voucher Program.  The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development shall, in consultation with the Secretary, use vouchers to support homeless veterans in the Los Angeles metropolitan area and around the Nation with respect to this effort.

    Sec. 4Restoring Accountability at the Department of Veterans Affairs.  The Secretary shall take the following steps to restore accountability and excellent service at the Department:

    (a)  take appropriate action against individuals who have committed misconduct, making full use of and in accordance with the Department of Veterans Affairs Accountability and Whistleblower Protection Act of 2017 (Public Law 115-41); and

    (b)  investigate and take steps to rectify the previous administration’s decision to rehire and reinstate back pay for employees previously fired for misconduct and direct such savings back toward care, benefits, and services for veterans, in accordance with all applicable laws.

    Sec. 5Providing Choices and Excellence to Veterans.  The Secretary shall take steps to increase the excellence of and options for care, benefits, and services for veterans including:

    (a)  within 60 days of the date of this order, submitting a report to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, with a plan to reduce wait times for Veterans Health Administration appointments that explores options like expanding office hours, offering weekend appointments, and increasing the use of virtual healthcare options;

    (b)  within 30 days of the date of this order, directing a feasibility study at the Manchester VA Medical Center and within 180 days of this order, submitting to the President, through the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, an action plan to expand services to support a full-service medical center in New Hampshire so that it is no longer the only State in the contiguous United States without such a center; and

    (c)  in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, and the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy, developing a strategy to improve the delivery and quality of the Department’s healthcare services in a more efficient and effective manner to support veterans; the strategy shall initially prioritize implementation of actions to reduce access times and improve service delivery, to include options for offering treatment to veterans at select military treatment facilities and military beneficiaries at VA facilities with appropriate reimbursement.

    Sec. 6General Provisions.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

    (i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or

    (ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

    (b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

    (c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

    (d)  The Department of Veterans Affairs shall provide funding for this order’s publication in the Federal Register.

                                  DONALD J. TRUMP

    THE WHITE HOUSE,

        May 9, 2025.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Bonta Doubles Down on CFPB Support

    Source: US State of California

    Urges court to keep order that will protect the agency from further dismemberment 

    OAKLAND — California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced joining a coalition of 23 attorneys general in submitting an amicus brief in National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, a lawsuit challenging the Trump Administration’s efforts to dismantle the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). In February, Attorney General Bonta submitted an initial amicus brief in this case, which was followed by the court granting a robust preliminary injunction, a decision that prevents the Trump Administration from moving forward with mass layoffs while litigation in this case proceeds. The Trump Administration has now appealed the preliminary injunction, asking the court to strike it down to allow further dismantling of the CFPB to continue. In today’s amicus brief, the attorneys general argue that shuttering the CFPB would cause catastrophic harm to consumer protections nationwide. These actions by the Trump Administration trample over the decision of Congress to create the agency, violating the separation of powers under the U.S. Constitution. 

    “Further demolishing the CFPB, the top cop protecting Americans from exploitation, would put families nationwide at a stark disadvantage when standing up to big businesses who aren’t playing by the rules,” said Attorney General Bonta. “I urge the court to keep in place the order preventing the Trump Administration from issuing mass layoffs at the CFPB — its loss would have devastating and deep implications for California, and the financial well-being of households across the nation.”

    In the brief, filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the attorneys general argue the dismantling of the CFPB will cause irreparable harm to consumers and the states’ own consumer protection enforcement efforts, leave no oversight over large national banks, and will rapidly and substantially increase the burden on state agencies to protect consumers from conduct regulated by the CFPB. The loss of the CFPB’s partnership has concrete and widespread implications: from the sharing of complaints and trend data, to providing training, to partnering on joint investigations and litigations, the CFPB has been a force multiplier for California’s consumer protection efforts.

    Background
     
    After examining the fallout of the 2008 financial crisis, Congress concluded the crisis resulted in part from the failure of federal banking and other regulators to address significant consumer protection issues detrimental to both consumers and the safety and soundness of the banking system. In direct response to these events, Congress established the CFPB and tasked it with enforcing numerous federal consumer protection statutes and enacting regulations to further these efforts. For over a decade, the CFPB has served as an invaluable partner to state attorneys general and state banking regulators, both by working to protect consumers against fraudulent and abusive practices and by advancing a fair and level playing field in consumer financial markets by issuing regulations under federal law. 
     
    In the last months, the Trump Administration has taken a series of actions intended to debilitate the CFPB, including issuing a suspension of work across the agency, terminating probationary employees, and announcing a decision not to draw additional funding from the Federal Reserve. These actions appear to be part of a unilateral effort to permanently shut down the agency, including programs and operations mandated by federal law. Most recently, the Trump Administration issued reduction in force notices to 90% of the CFPB’s workforce — a move that was swiftly blocked by the courts.

    Attorney General Bonta has been a vocal supporter of CFPB. In February, Attorney General Bonta submitted an amicus brief in another case, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
     
    In filing the brief, Attorney General Bonta joins the attorneys general of New York, New Jersey, the District of Columbia, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.

    A copy of the brief can be found here.  

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: New affordable homes open for people in Courtenay

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    Indigenous Elders, individuals and people with disabilities with low or moderate incomes now have access to 40 affordable homes in Courtenay.

    “The opening of these homes means more people can have safe, affordable places to live, close to their families, culture and community,” said Ravi Kahlon, Minister of Housing and Municipal Affairs. “These welcoming spaces will make people feel safe, supported and truly at home in affordable housing that meets their needs.”

    Naut’sa mawt (pronounced not-sa mott), a Coast Salish word meaning “together as one,” at 1679 McPhee Ave. is a five-storey, wood-frame building with 40 affordable homes prioritized for Indigenous people. Managed by Wachiay Friendship Centre Society, the building features a mix of studio and one-bedroom units with rents ranging from $500 to approximately $1,300 per month. Nearly 80% of units are fully accessible or adaptable, and thoughtfully designed to support people with diverse needs.

    “We raise our hands to celebrate the community support provided by AHMA member, Wachiay Friendship Centre Society,” said Margaret Pfoh, CEO of the Aboriginal Housing Management Association (AHMA). “AHMA members are quietly making a huge difference all across B.C. with housing that is affordable, culturally informed and serves those most in need.”

    The Wachiay Friendship Centre Society owns the building and aims to create a space where Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities can gather, exchange traditions and learn from one another. The building is adjacent to the Wachiay Friendship Centre, which delivers more than 50 programs and services to Indigenous and non-Indigenous people.

    “Wachiay Friendship Centre Society is thrilled to see the completion of Naut’sa Mawt,” said Monica Goodheart, president of Wachiay Friendship Centre Society. “This will provide much-needed housing for our most vulnerable and valued population, our Elders and other community members who are struggling to find safe affordable housing.”

    This project is part of a $19-billion housing investment by the B.C. government. Since 2017, the Province has nearly 92,000 homes delivered or underway, including more than 700 in Courtenay.

    Quotes:

    George Anderson, MLA for Nanaimo-Lantzville –

    “The opening of these 40 homes is a meaningful example of what can be achieved through strong partnerships with Indigenous communities. Everyone deserves a safe place to call home, and that’s exactly what these homes represent for the people of Courtenay.”

    Josie Osborne, MLA for Mid Island-Pacific Rim –

    “We are welcoming 40 new homes into the community of Courtenay, homes that will soon be filled with stories, connection and the daily rhythms of life. These homes are more than buildings. They are a foundation for people to stay rooted in the place they love, close to family, culture and community.”

    Will Cole-Hamilton, board chair, Comox Valley Regional District –  

    “This project represents key relationships with our Indigenous partners and addresses ongoing housing needs in the community. Congratulations to the Wachiay Friendship Centre Society on this fantastic achievement in providing safe and inclusive spaces to those in need.” 

    Bob Wells, mayor of Courtenay –  

    “Partnerships have played a key role in this amazing project, and we’re proud the City has been a contributor. We are truly grateful for the vision and leadership of Wachiay Friendship Centre Society, collaboration with M’akola Housing Society and major funding from BC Housing and CMHC.” 

    Quick Facts:

    • The Province, through BC Housing, contributed $7.2 million for the project through the Community Housing Fund.
    • The Province is also providing an annual operating subsidy of $212,000.
    • The federal government, through the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, provided $2 million through the Affordable Housing Fund.
    • The Wachiay Friendship Centre Society provided the land, valued at approximately $878,000, and $5,000 in cash equity toward the project.
    • Other contributions include a grant of approximately $180,000 from Comox Valley Regional District, approximately $90,000 in waived development fees from the City of Courtenay and nearly $24,000 grant from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.

    Learn More:

    To learn about the steps the Province is taking to tackle the housing crisis and deliver affordable homes for people in British Columbia, visit: https://strongerbc.gov.bc.ca/housing/ 

    A map showing the location of all announced provincially funded housing projects in B.C. is available here:  https://www.bchousing.org/projects-partners/Building-BC/homes-for-BC  

    To learn how BC Housing is helping to build strong, inclusive housing communities, visit: https://www.bchousing.org/podcast

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: VA statement regarding President Trump’s executive order

    Source: US Department of Veterans Affairs

    Skip to content

    WASHINGTON – After President Trump signed an executive order to provide better care to Veterans, improve accountability for such care, and establish a National Center for Warrior Independence for homeless Veterans, Department of Veterans Affairs Secretary Doug Collins released the following statement:

    “Under President Trump, VA is implementing a host of important reforms to improve care and benefits for our nation’s heroes,” said VA Secretary Doug Collins. “This executive order builds on the progress we’ve made so far and puts us on a path to fixing some of the department’s most vexing problems.

    “After decades of mismanagement, VA has been leasing parts of its 388-acre West Los Angeles VA Medical Center campus to a wealthy and exclusive private school and the University of California, Los Angeles, baseball team. Today’s executive order will enable us to ensure VA’s West Los Angeles Campus is being used as intended: to benefit Veterans. Our goal is to turn the campus into a beacon of hope and a destination for homeless Veterans from across the nation who can travel there to find housing and support and start their journey back to self-sufficiency.

    “Under President Biden, VA failed to hold its employees properly accountable and actively fought congressional attempts to make it easier to fire poor-performing workers – even as health care wait times and benefits backlogs increased. With this executive order, VA will become the most accountable agency in the entire federal government. We’re going to celebrate the vast majority of VA employees who do a great job every day, hold employees accountable when they fall short of the mission and work to fix the wait-time and backlog issues that developed during the Biden Administration.

    “New Hampshire is the only state in the contiguous United States without a full-service VA medical center. In response to this executive order, we will develop a plan to ensure that is no longer the case.”

    Additional announcements regarding VA’s implementation of the EO are forthcoming. Read more about the EO here.

    ###

    Reporters and media outlets with questions or comments should contact the Office of Media Relations at vapublicaffairs@va.gov

    Veterans with questions about their health care and benefits (including GI Bill). Questions, updates and documents can be submitted online.

    Contact us online through Ask VA

    Veterans can also use our chatbot to get information about VA benefits and services. The chatbot won’t connect you with a person, but it can show you where to go on VA.gov to find answers to some common questions.

    Learn about our chatbot and ask a question

    Subscribe today to receive these news releases in your inbox.

    Page load link

    Go to Top

    MIL OSI USA News