NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: housing

  • MIL-OSI China: Trump’s threats complicate Gaza ceasefire deal: Hamas

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Members of the Al-Qassam Brigades, the armed wing of Hamas, and an Israeli hostage are seen during the handover of three Israeli hostages to the International Committee of the Red Cross in the al-Nuseirat refugee camp, central Gaza, on Feb. 22, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    Hamas on Thursday condemned U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent threats against the group, saying they complicate matters regarding the Gaza ceasefire agreement and encourage Israel not to implement its terms.

    “There is an agreement that was signed, and Washington was the mediator in it,” Hamas spokesman Hazem Qassem said in a statement, adding that the deal “includes the release of all (hostages and) prisoners in three stages. Hamas has implemented what it was required to do in the first stage, while Israel is evading the second stage.”

    The statement noted that the U.S. administration is required to pressure Israel to enter negotiations on the second phase as stipulated in the ceasefire agreement.

    Trump issued what he called the “last warning” to Hamas on his Truth Social platform on Wednesday, saying, “Release all of the hostages now, not later, and immediately return all of the dead bodies of the people you murdered, or it is OVER for you.”

    “I am sending Israel everything it needs to finish the job, not a single Hamas member will be safe if you don’t do as I say,” he said in the post.

    Trump’s warning came after the White House confirmed Wednesday that the U.S. administration is having direct talks with Hamas aimed at releasing hostages being held in Gaza.

    The talks, first reported by the American news website Axios, were held in Qatar’s Doha in recent weeks, with the U.S. side led by presidential envoy for hostage affairs Adam Boehler.

    White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters that “Israel was consulted on this matter” but refused to disclose further information.

    A Gaza ceasefire and hostage release agreement, brokered by Egypt, Qatar, and the United States, took effect on Jan. 19. During the initial 42-day phase of the deal, dozens of Israeli hostages and hundreds of Palestinian prisoners and detainees were freed.

    A total of 59 hostages are still in Hamas captivity, according to the Israel Defense Forces, which confirmed 35 of them are dead. Among those hostages, five are Americans, including just one who is believed to be alive.

    MIL OSI China News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Archaeologists restoring centuries-old Chorm Temple in Angkor complex

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    Archaeologists have been restoring the ruined Chorm Temple within Angkor Thom in the UNESCO-listed Angkor Archaeological Park in northwest Cambodia, said an APSARA National Authority (ANA)’s news release on Thursday.

    ANA architect Thai Yamang said the restoration work, in collaboration with the Korean Heritage Agency, began in November 2023 and has achieved significant progress so far, gradually regaining the temple’s original appearance and beauty.

    “Prior to the restoration, Chorm Temple was in a severely dilapidated state, suffering from the effects of time and natural elements,” he said.

    Tree roots had intruded into the structure, compromising its integrity and allowing rainwater to seep in, which weakened the foundation, Yamang said, adding that many stones had fallen or were damaged, including lintels and pillars, and some areas were missing stones altogether.

    “Approximately 60 percent of the restoration work has been completed, with efforts focusing on reconstructing pillars, door frames, pediments, roofs, and lintels,” he said.

    “The team is committed to reassembling the stones in their original positions, adhering to the guidelines set forth in the Angkor Charter,” he added.

    Yamang said that due to these dedicated efforts, Chorm Temple, built in the early 12th century, is gradually transforming from a state of ruin back into a site of historical beauty and significance.

    Located in Siem Reap province, the 401-square-km Angkor Archaeological Park is home to 91 ancient temples, which had been built from the 9th to the 13th centuries.

    The ancient park attracted a total of 1.02 million international tourists in 2024, generating a gross revenue of $47.8 million from ticket sales, according to the state-owned Angkor Enterprise.

    MIL OSI China News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Pop star returns to her ethnic Miao roots

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    Stardom often leads artists to chase the next big trend, but one female pop singer has embarked on a remarkable journey of reinvention.

    Known for her catchy hits and glamorous performances, A Duo has made a deep, unexpected shift from the glitzy world of pop music to becoming a popularizer of Miao ethnic culture, with a new stage production that bridges the ancient and the modern.

    Titled Reborn Beats, the production premiered on Dec 31 in the seaside community of Aranya in Qinhuangdao, Hebei province, and is about to kick off a national tour on Friday to cities such as Shanghai, Beijing and Shenzhen, Guangdong province.

    The 45-year-old singer, who is also the scriptwriter and director, has seamlessly blended her pop background with ancient Miao traditions in a dazzling performance that is both a tribute to her heritage, and a platform for bringing her culture to a contemporary audience — many of whom may have never encountered it before.

    Reborn Beats is the story of Ye Zi, a young woman from the mountains, who seeks to adapt to life in the city. In doing so, she abandons her ability to communicate with nature and all living things. However, she repeatedly faces setbacks to love, friendship and dreams. On a rooftop one day, she receives a call informing her that her grandmother is critically ill. This prompts her to return home, setting off a colorful and magical adventure.

    Traditional Miao musical instruments, including the lusheng (a reed pipe) and drums, are featured in the production, along with contemporary musical elements.

    Once a symbol of modernity, A Duo now dresses in a stunning, richly embroidered Miao-inspired costume as a visual representation of her respect for her cultural heritage. She plays the role of the grandmother, who she describes as a wise, elderly woman with a face full of wrinkles.

    “The character reminds me of my own grandmother, who was hardworking, kindhearted, wise, and took care of the family,” she says.

    A Duo spent about 10 years working on Reborn Beats. Her aim is to show that Miao culture is not some static relic of the past but rather a dynamic, evolving force. She also wants to deliver an inspiring message about the transition of women, a theme that mirrors her personal path of evolution.

    Born in Hunan province to a Tujia father and a Miao mother, A Duo gained fame after performing the dance song Goodbye, Carmen on the annual China Central Television Spring Festival Gala in 2005. She was signed by a major Chinese record label and released several pop albums.

    However, despite the fame and flashing lights, her life was not without struggles. The pain of personal relationships, career exhaustion, and health issues led her to step out of the limelight.

    “I thought about what kind of life I wanted to live, what kind of person I wanted to become, and what I was chasing,” she says.

    Beneath the glitter of stardom, there was a yearning for a more meaningful form of expression — something rooted in history, heritage and culture. It was a longing to do more than entertain; she wanted to create something that would resonate beyond the superficiality of pop fame. That’s when Miao culture, a tradition she is closely connected to through her ancestry, entered her life with full force.

    From 2012 to 2016, she spent her days in remote villages in Hunan, Yunnan and Guizhou provinces, where the Miao and Tujia live. During her stay, she recorded folk songs and dance moves. She also learned miaogu, a Miao percussion performance, from 89-year-old Hong Fuqiang in Baojing county in the Xiangxi Tujia and Miao autonomous prefecture in Hunan. It was there that she officially became an inheritor of Miao drum dance, setting the stage for her next artistic chapter.

    Living in villages allowed her to embrace a simpler lifestyle and brought back vivid memories. A Duo was raised by her grandmother, and the wooden door of her grandmother’s house always creaked. A creak meant someone was leaving, and another creak meant that breakfast was ready. The door was like a clock, and the creak was like its chime. She wanted to preserve these emotionally charged sounds in the production, alongside things like picking cotton, sifting rice, spinning machines, and grinding stones.

    “I’m a translator, interpreting what the previous generation of masters has passed down and making it resonate with today’s young people,” A Duo says.

    Reborn Beats brings together five inheritors of Miao ethnic folk arts, including singer Long Xian’e and lusheng player Yang Shengwen. They share A Duo’s vision of music that revives a cultural legacy they believe has the power to inspire future generations.

    “As an inheritor of lusheng, I always want to present the instrument to a wider audience, and with Reborn Beats, we have made this possible,” says Yang, who performs with the China Ethnic Song and Dance Ensemble, and has been playing the instrument for decades.

    “The lusheng is not just treated as an embellishment but prominently featured in the production, especially when it’s integrated into contemporary music elements. It allows the audience to see and feel the essence of the instrument, and experience its sound in a fresh and engaging way,” Yang notes.

    MIL OSI China News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Auckland News – Water Restrictions Threaten Auckland’s Housing Development Pipeline

    Source: WarkWorthWeb

    Auckland’s housing development face a significant hurdle as Watercare, the region’s water and wastewater provider, implements water restrictions across several areas. The move, aimed at managing water supply amid growing demand, has blindsided developers who warn of delays, increased costs, and potential financial strain on the industry.

    The restrictions, which limit the amount of water, stormwater and/or sewer available for new connections, come as Auckland grapples with infrastructure challenges and population growth. Developers in affected areas, including parts of the city’s northwest and south, are now unable to secure water connections for new housing projects, effectively putting developments on hold.

     “This decision has caught many developers off guard”, says Troy Patchett, Director at Subdivide Simplified. “Water & Drainage is obviously a fundamental requirement for any housing project. This will undoubtedly delay the delivery of much-needed housing stock and could push some developers to the brink”. (ref. https://www.subdividesimplified.co.nz/ )

    Patchett emphasised the broader implications for Auckland’s housing crisis. “Auckland is already facing a housing shortage, and these restrictions will only exacerbate the problem. The timing couldn’t be worse, as the city is in desperate need of more affordable, healthy, and accessible housing.”

    Watercare has defended the restrictions, citing the need to balance water supply with increasing demand. A spokesperson for the organisation stated, “Rapid growth in some areas has put pressure on our infrastructure. These restrictions are a necessary step to manage capacity while we work on long-term solutions.”

    Patchett believes the changes could have been handled far better, with a more structured approach to minimise disruption. “A decent lead-in time would have allowed developers to adjust their plans and manage the transition more effectively. Instead, we’ve been hit with a sudden blanket ban, which is causing chaos across the industry,” he said. “Most people were expecting restrictions to be applied on a case-by-case basis, not this sweeping measure that affects entire regions.”

    The decision has sparked calls for better planning and collaboration between Watercare, local councils, and developers. Patchett urged authorities to prioritise infrastructure investment to support growth. “This situation highlights the need for proactive planning and investment in water infrastructure. Without it, Auckland’s growth ambitions will remain constrained,” he said.

    The restrictions have also raised concerns about the financial viability of projects already in the pipeline. Developers who have invested heavily in land and planning now face uncertainty, with some warning of potential losses if the situation is not resolved promptly.

    As Auckland continues to grow, the pressure on its infrastructure will only intensify. The current restrictions serve as a stark reminder of the challenges facing the city and the urgent need for coordinated action to ensure sustainable development.

    For now, developers and homebuyers alike are left in limbo, waiting for clarity on when and how the restrictions will be lifted. In the meantime, the housing crisis shows no signs of abating, and the stakes for Auckland’s future have never been higher.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER DEMANDS ANSWERS & THAT ALBANY FED BUILDING REMAIN OPEN: AFTER BEING LISTED BY GSA FOR SALE AMID ‘DOGE’ CUTS, SENATOR SAYS WE NEED ANSWERS & ASSURANCES THAT VITAL SERVICES AND FED OFFICES WILL…

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer
    This Week GSA Listed The Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building In Albany And 400+ Other Fed Properties As ‘Designated For Disposal,’ But Mysteriously Removed List On That Same Day – Creating Confusion & Concern Building Could Close And Services Could Get Cut For Capital Region
    O’Brien Building Hosts Offices For Social Security, IRS, Military Processing And Its Presence Has Been Essential To Providing Federal Services To Albany Area For Over 50 Years
    Schumer: Capital Region Families, Seniors Can’t Have Fed Building Close And Services Cut Off, We Need Answers & Clarity ASAP
    After the Trump administration placed the Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building on a list of federal properties “designated for disposal” and abruptly removed that list, U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer today demanded answers from the General Services Administration (GSA) and assurances that the building will remain open and services uninterrupted for Capital Region residents. Schumer said the building is critical to the Capital Region and that seniors, workers, and families that rely on services in the building need clarity on future plans for this vital hub for services. 
    “This week, Albany’s O’Brien Federal Building was placed on GSA’s list of federal properties for sale and within a day, that list disappeared, creating confusion, concern, and chaos. Now many are worried this could mean the building will close and services, including a Social Security office, will be interrupted for thousands of Capital Region families, workers and seniors. GSA won’t say what its plans are and ‘DOGE’ is being dodgey about whether this Albany building is next on their chaotic chopping block. This building is where Capital Region families and seniors get help with Social Security checks, where military recruits get processed, where people go with questions on the status of their tax returns, and thousands have gotten help with other vital federal services for 50 years,”  said Senator Schumer. “My constituents in the Capital Region deserve to know what caused this chaos and who is making these decisions. They deserve certainty on the future of this building and the vital services it hosts. I am all for cutting waste and making government more efficient, but selling a property for nickels only to have taxpayers pay significantly more to lease and maintain access to these services just isn’t smart business. It’s penny wise and pound foolish, and a giveaway to private landlords. Capital Region families and federal workers have little clarity on what the future holds and we need answers now.” 
    Albany’s Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building is home to 20 federal government agencies including the Social Security Administration office, a day care for children of federal employees, a U.S. Military Entrance Processing Station, the IRS, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, and the senator’s Capital Region office. Schumer said that since it was listed earlier this week for potential disposal, his office has been inundated with inquiries on the future of the building, whether it will be closed or sold and whether services will be cut off. Schumer said it is imperative the building remain open and services are maintained, and is now demanding answers on what happened. 
    Albany Mayor Kathy Sheehan said, “The Leo O’Brien Building is a hub of vital federal government services, and our residents must have access to these services and the ability to interact with federal agencies — particularly in one of the most underserved census tracts in the entire region. I commend Senator Schumer for demanding answers of this administration and for calling out yet another example of the mismanagement and chaos carried out by DOGE.”
    This would not be the first instance of offices that provide vital federal services in NY being potentially shut down by DOGE. Social Security offices in the Hudson Valley have already been listed on the DOGE “wall of receipts” which could impact services for thousands who rely on them to help with payments.
    Schumer’s letter to General Services Administration Deputy Administrator and Acting Administrator Stephen Ehikian can be found below:
    Dear Acting Administrator Ehikian,
    I write with deep concern over the Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building in Albany N.Y. appearing on a list of buildings potentially being listed for sale or closure amid cuts by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). On Tuesday, the Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building and over 400 other federal properties were placed on a list of “non-core” properties that the General Services Administration (GSA) said are “designated for disposal.” Later that same day, GSA abruptly removed this list, creating chaos and confusion for the people who work in these buildings. The people of the Capital Region and I need answers on your plans for this building, assurances that it will remain open and that the critical services it hosts will continue uninterrupted for the thousands of New Yorkers who rely on them. 
    The Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building is home to 20 federal government agencies including the Social Security Administration office, a day care for children of federal employees, a U.S. Military Entrance Processing Station, and my Capital Region office. For 50 years, it has been where Capital Region residents interact with the federal government for essential services like assistance with Social Security checks and the IRS or seeking justice in U.S. Bankruptcy Court. This is where new military recruits from the Capital Region are processed for service. Seeing this building on a list of properties “designated for disposal” created panic for Albany’s federal workers, who are already seeing the federal workforce slashed by DOGE. The list’s sudden removal within hours of first being posted has raised even more questions and caused even more chaos and uncertainty.
    Your plans and process for determining the future of the building remain unclear. The GSA is listing the building as a “non-core” property despite the essential services the federal agencies within the building provide on a daily basis. The public has yet to see any cost-benefit studies to justify a potential major sale like this, and many have raised serious concerns that a measure like this would end up costing taxpayers significantly more by forcing federal offices to be leased by a private landlord. To add to the concerns, removing this list with no communication about if or when the list will be re-posted or updated underscores the complete disorganization and inefficiency of a process that potentially impacts jobs and vital services for my constituents. The hard-working federal workers in this building and the communities who rely on their services in New York’s Capital Region deserve clarity and certainty.
    In an effort to cut through the confusion, I seek answers on the following:
    What factors led to the Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building’s placement on this list of properties “designated for disposal”? 
    Who is making the decisions on this lease, and what involvement does DOGE have in that process?
    Why was this list taken down so quickly? If so, will the list be updated and what criteria are being used for determining whether a property remains on an updated list?
    Why did you not follow the standard processes of seeking public input about the loss of a federal building? Please provide any and all cost-benefit analysis studies that have been done relevant to the decision-making process for this property. 
    If the building is sold, is there an alternative plan for the federal offices located in the building? What assurances can be given that existing services in the building will not be disrupted due to a sale of this property? 
    This building has been integral to the federal government’s work in the Capital Region for 50 years, and its abrupt closure and sale would disrupt essential services my constituents rely on. We should not be haphazardly selling America’s real estate portfolio and causing chaos and uncertainty for the American people. This process is everything but efficient. I ask for your prompt answers to my questions above and urge you to maintain the Leo W. O’Brien Federal Building in Albany so federal workers can continue to support and serve the Capital Region and all of New York State.
    Sincerely,

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: [MWC 2025] Powered by Awesome Intelligence: Introducing the Galaxy A56 5G and A36 5G

    Source: Samsung

    Samsung Electronics unveiled the latest additions to the Galaxy A series at Mobile World Congress 2025 in Barcelona. The Galaxy A56 5G and A36 5G mark the first time the Galaxy A series has come equipped with Awesome Intelligence, making them smarter and more appealing than ever — a true embodiment of the Galaxy A series’ commitment to bringing innovative Galaxy experiences to everyone.
     
    Samsung Newsroom explored the Galaxy A56 5G and A36 5G, highlighting four key elements that set them apart.
     
     
    1. Stylish — A Sleek and Compact Design
    The Iconic Galaxy A Series Look, Now More Refined
    The Galaxy A56 5G and A36 5G take the signature design of the Galaxy A series to the next level, blending modern sophistication with a sleek aesthetic. The first thing that catches the eye is their slim, flat frame.
     
    The Galaxy A56 5G features a polished metal frame, available in a range of stylish colors. The A56 5G’s colorways stand out with their milky matte finish, while the A36 5G’s color options captivate with their holographic effects.
     
    ▲ The Galaxy A56 5G will be available in Awesome Pink, Awesome Olive, Awesome Lightgray and Awesome Graphite, while the Galaxy A36 5G will come in Awesome Lime, Awesome Black, Awesome Lavender and Awesome White.
     
    Their minimalist yet elegant rear design features a clean, vertically aligned three-lens camera layout with black camera rings that further enhance the refined aesthetic.
     
    ▲ (From left to right) The rear of the Galaxy A56 5G and A36 5G with their linear three-lens camera layout and black camera rings
     
     
    A Slimmer and Lighter Body
    Both the Galaxy A56 5G and A36 5G feature a 6.7-inch screen, 0.1 inch larger than that of their predecessors. The FHD+ Super AMOLED display delivers a peak brightness of 1,200 nits — 200 nits brighter than before — ensuring an even more immersive and vivid viewing experience.
     
    Trimmed down by 0.8mm compared to their predecessors, both models also sport a slimmer profile at just 7.4mm thick, offering a firm yet comfortable grip when held. The flat key island design on the sides complement the streamlined aesthetic, adding to the devices’ refined look.
     
    Thanks to their slimmer design, both devices are also lighter than the previous models, despite having larger displays. The Galaxy A56 5G weighs 198g — 15g lighter than its predecessor, while the Galaxy A36 5G shed 14g to come in at 195g.
     
    ▲ The slim 7.4mm profile combined with the flat frame and key island design offers a firm, comfortable grip when held.
     
     
    2. Versatile and Intelligent — Fueled by Awesome Intelligence
    Searching Made Simple With Circle to Search
    Circle to Search makes finding information effortless. All users need to do is long press the home button , then draw a circle around anything interesting they see on their screen and watch in awe as Google provides relevant search results in an instant.
     
    
    ▲ Circle to Search makes image searching a breeze.
     
    And it’s not just for images! Circle to Search now recognizes music as well — for example, the background music playing in a video. When watching something on YouTube, simply long press the home button. Then tap the music button to instantly find the name of the song featured in the video and the artist who sings it. That same song can be identified even when sung or hummed by a person, instead of being played from the video’s original audio.
     
    
    ▲ Circle to Search can also recognize and identify music in an instant.
     
     
    3. Picture-Perfect — Smarter Camera Features and Photo-Editing Tools
    Nightography and Object Eraser — Flawless Selfies Even at Night
    Imagine taking in the atmosphere during a nighttime walk and snapping a selfie, only to be disappointed by the noise in the final image. Or perhaps a scenario where a countless number of selfies had to be taken before realizing none of them quite achieved the right look. With the enhanced Nightography feature on the Galaxy A56 5G, those frustrations are a thing of the past. Clear, vibrant selfies can be captured even at night with a 12MP front camera optimized to reduce noise and deliver smoother results.
     
    Unwanted objects in the background can take away from the perfect selfie as well. Simply trace around those objects to remove them, and Object Eraser will seamlessly fill in the space where they originally were to blend naturally with the background, resulting in a clean, crisp photo.
     
    ▲ Clear, vibrant selfies can be taken even at night with Nightography.
     
     
    Custom Camera Filters for Standout Selfies
    Some portrait photos on social media just have that one vibe, an unmistakable look hard to find anywhere else. Instead of scrolling past those images, why not save them? With the Filters feature, users can easily create their own custom camera filters using saved images. Achieving the perfect selfie with the desired aesthetic has never been easier.
     

    ▲ The Filters feature provides users with custom camera filters.
     
     
    Best Face — Perfect Group Photos Everyone Will Love
    Group selfies don’t always go as planned — someone could be blinking or have an awkward expression on their face. But with the Best Face feature, those slip-ups are an easy fix. Best Face analyzes the multiple frames of pictures taken using Motion Photo to recommend the best ones. All that is left for Galaxy A56 5G users to do afterwards is simply browse through the suggested frames and select a flawless group selfie where everyone looks their best.
     
    
    ▲ The Best Face feature makes sure users look their very best in photos.
     
     
    4. Powerful and Secure — Enhanced Privacy Safeguards
    The Galaxy A56 5G and A36 5G are the first in the Galaxy A series to feature One UI 7, offering more robust security than ever before. One key highlight is the hardware-backed Knox Vault, which combines a secure processor with secure memory to isolate users’ most sensitive data — like personal identification numbers (PINs) and passwords — from the rest of their device and ensure that no one else can physically or remotely access them. The new smartphones also come equipped with a range of extensive security innovations, including an enhanced Auto Blocker — Galaxy’s opt-in package of security measures that prevents unauthorized app installations and other security threats — and the new Theft Protection feature, which ensures personal data is protected even when devices are lost or stolen.
     
    Samsung also promises six years of security updates along with up to six generations of Android OS and One UI upgrades for the Galaxy A56 5G and A36 5G, ensuring a secure and reliable mobile experience for years to come.
     
    The Galaxy A series is back with cutting-edge innovations. With the Awesome Intelligence-integrated Galaxy A56 5G and A36 5G, Samsung looks forward to seeing even more people enjoy an Awesome lifestyle.

    MIL OSI Economics –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: VIDEO: Senator Peters Calls for Passage of the PRO Act to Protect American Workers’ Right to Organize

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Michigan Gary Peters
    Published: 03.06.2025
    Peters Again Cosponsored and Helped Reintroduce the Bill to Support Workers in Michigan and Across the Country

    WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senator Gary Peters (MI) called for passage of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, comprehensive legislation to protect workers’ right to stand together and bargain for higher wages, better benefits, and safer workplaces. The PRO Act, which Peters again cosponsored and helped reintroduce this Congress, would restore fairness to the economy by strengthening the federal laws that protect workers’ right to join a union freely and fairly.
    “Labor unions created the American middle class,” said Senator Peters. “The PRO Act will make it easier for folks to organize, to become a member of a union, and be able to stand up for the rights that they deserve. I come from a union household. My parents were both members of the union. I am who I am because of the love and support that they gave me, and the fact that they were part of a union allowed them to provide for my future. That’s why we’ve got to pass the PRO Act.”

    To watch the video, click here.
    The PRO Act, which Peters previously spoke in favor of on the Senate floor, would protect every American’s right to organize in their workplace and collectively bargain. The bill specifically includes measures that would:
    Hold employers accountable for violating workers’ rights by authorizing meaningful penalties, facilitating initial collective bargaining agreements, and closing loopholes that allow employers to misclassify their employees as supervisors and independent contractors.
    Empower workers to exercise their right to organize by strengthening support for workers who suffer retaliation for exercising their rights, protecting workers’ right to support secondary boycotts, ensuring workers can collect “fair share” fees, and authorizing a private right of action for violation of workers’ rights.
    Secure free, fair, and safe union elections by preventing employers from interfering in union elections, prohibiting captive audience meetings, and requiring employers to be transparent with their workers.
    Peters grew up in a union household, where his mother was a Service Employees International Union (SEIU) steward, and his father was a member of the National Education Association (NEA). During his annual motorcycle tour across Michigan last year, Peters met with local union members and retirees at IBEW Local 131 in Kalamazoo to underscore the need to protect workers’ right to collectively bargain. Peters also joined UAW members on the picket line in Michigan as they negotiated for better wages, benefits, and job security. Then, following the UAW’s historic contracts in 2024, Peters led his colleagues in sending a letter to 13 non-unionized automakers urging them not to illegally block UAW unionization efforts at their manufacturing plants. Peters invited UAW Region 1 Director LaShawn English to be his guest for the 2024 State of the Union Address last year.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Australian women are diverse, so the approach to women’s safety should be as well

    Source: Australian Human Rights Commission

    This International Women’s Day, the Commissioners at the Australian Human Rights Commission stand together to call for urgent action to ensure that all women and girls—of every background, age or disability—can live free from violence, discrimination, and inequality.

    This year’s International Women’s Day theme, “For ALL women and girls: Rights. Equality. Empowerment,” is a reminder that gender equality can only be achieved when every woman and girl has their rights upheld, their safety guaranteed, and their voices heard. Gender equality benefits all of us.

    For too many women, this vision remains out of reach. Women in Australia continue to face gender-based violence at devastating rates, economic insecurity that puts them at risk, and structural barriers that leave them without access to support or justice. These issues are not separate—they are interconnected. That is why we must take a prevention-first approach that reflects the diversity of Australian women and girls.

    We also urge governments to commit to sustainable funding for community-led, trauma-informed, and person-centred solutions, ensuring that the women and communities most affected by violence and discrimination lead the responses. This cannot be achieved without real accountability.

    This International Women’s Day, we ask Australia to move beyond rhetoric and commit to genuine systemic change. Women’s safety must be a guarantee – it cannot be an afterthought.

    “International Women’s Day is a moment to celebrate progress, but it is also a call to action. We cannot achieve gender equality while women continue to live in fear of violence and discrimination. We know what works in communities, workplaces, and homes, let’s listen to women and girls and be led by them.”
    Dr Anna Cody, Sex Discrimination Commissioner

    “For migrant, refugee, and First Nations women and girls, safety is often undermined by racism, visa insecurity, and systemic barriers to justice. True empowerment means ensuring negatively racialised women and girls have equal protection under the law and that their perspectives are built into policy and practice.”
    Giridharan Sivaraman, Race Discrimination Commissioner

    “While Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women are the bedrock of our communities, we also face challenges like domestic and family violence at disproportionate rates – a crisis further compounded by the ongoing issue of misidentification as perpetrators. Too often, these women remain invisible within the statistics that should be driving our reforms. We must have targeted, culturally informed strategies that acknowledge and address these systemic shortcomings.”
    Katie Kiss, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner

    “Housing insecurity has become increasingly widespread among older women. The rate of homelessness among older women has grown by almost 40% in the last ten years. We cannot talk about women’s safety without addressing economic inequality and the structural barriers that put them at risk.”
    Robert Fitzgerald AM, Age Discrimination Commissioner

    Women and girls with disability experience higher rates of violence, yet their specific and unique experiences are often not recognised or addressed in gender-based violence responses. We need accessible, and rights-based solutions to ensure no woman or girl is excluded.”
    Rosemary Kayess, Disability Discrimination Commissioner

    “All children should be safe, and their wellbeing should be made a national priority for Australia. 1 in 3 girls experience child sexual abuse. If we are serious about ending gender-based violence, we must stop the violence experienced by children in their homes and ensure that children with trauma get the help they need. For too long we have neglected the wellbeing of children – this International Women’s Day I call for child wellbeing to be made a priority for National Cabinet.”
    Anne Hollonds, National Children’s Commissioner

    “Australian women and girls are diverse, but one thing that should be shared by us all is being able to live free from violence and fear. International Women’s Day is a day to reaffirm the importance of ensuring that these shared rights are upheld for all women and girls.”
    Lorraine Finlay, Human Rights Commissioner

    This International Women’s Day, we call on governments, policymakers, and communities to act. For ALL women and girls—Rights, Equality, Empowerment.

    ENDS | Media contact: media@humanrights.gov.au or 0457 281 897 (only calls, no texts please) 

    MIL OSI News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Jonathan Cook: Yes, Trump is vulgar. But the US global shakedown is the same one as ever

    Report by Dr David Robie – Café Pacific. –

    ANALYSIS: By Jonathan Cook

    If there is one thing we can thank US President Donald Trump for, it is this: he has decisively stripped away the ridiculous notion, long cultivated by Western media, that the United States is a benign global policeman enforcing a “rules-based order”.

    Washington is better understood as the head of a gangster empire, embracing 800 military bases around the world. Since the end of the Cold War, it has been aggressively seeking “global full-spectrum domination”, as the Pentagon doctrine politely terms it.

    You either pay fealty to the Don or you get dumped in the river. Last Friday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was presented with a pair of designer concrete boots at the White House.

    The US president looked like a gangster as he roughed up Zelensky. But he wasn’t the one who stoked a war that’s killed huge numbers of Ukrainians and Russians. Image: www.jonathan-cook.net

    The innovation was that it all happened in front of the Western press corps, in the Oval Office, rather than in a back room, out of sight. It made for great television, Trump crowed.

    Pundits have been quick to reassure us that the shouting match was some kind of weird Trumpian thing. As though being inhospitable to state leaders, and disrespectful to the countries they head, is unique to this administration.

    Take just the example of Iraq. The administration of Bill Clinton thought it “worth it” – as his secretary of state, Madeleine Albright, infamously put it — to kill an estimated half a million Iraqi children by imposing draconian sanctions through the 1990s.

    Under Clinton’s successor, George W Bush, the US then waged an illegal war in 2003, on entirely phoney grounds, that killed around half a million Iraqis, according to post-war estimates, and made four million homeless.

    Those worrying about the White House publicly humiliating Zelensky might be better advised to save their concern for the hundreds of thousands of mostly Ukrainian and Russian men killed or wounded fighting an entirely unnecessary war — one, as we shall see, Washington carefully engineered through Nato over the preceding two decades.

    Henchman Zelensky
    All those casualties served the same goal as they did in Iraq: to remind the world who is boss.

    Uniquely, Western publics don’t understand this simple point because they live inside a disinformation bubble, created for them by the Western establishment media.

    Henry Kissinger, the long-time steward of US foreign policy, famously said: “It may be dangerous to be America’s enemy, but to be America’s friend is fatal.”

    Zelensky just found that out the hard way. Gangster empires are just as fickle as the gangsters we know from Hollywood movies. Under the previous Joe Biden administration, Zelensky had been recruited as a henchman to do Washington’s bidding on Moscow’s doorstep.

    The background — the one Western media have kept largely out of view — is that, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, the US tore up treaties crucial to reassuring Russia of Nato’s good intent.

    Viewed from Moscow, and given Washington’s track record, Nato’s European security umbrella must have looked more like preparation for an ambush.

    Keen though Trump now is to rewrite history and cast himself as peacemaker, he was central to the escalating tensions that led to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

    In 2019, he unilaterally withdrew from the 1987 Treaty on Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces. That opened the door to the US launching a potential first strike on Russia, using missiles stationed in nearby Nato members Romania and Poland.

    He also sent Javelin anti-tank weapons to Ukraine, a move avoided by his predecessor, Barack Obama, for fear it would be seen as provocative.

    Repeatedly, Nato vowed to bring Ukraine into its fold, despite Russia’s warnings that the step was viewed as an existential threat, that Moscow could not allow Washington to place missiles on its border, any more than the US accepted Soviet missiles stationed in Cuba back in the early 1960s.

    Washington pressed ahead anyway, even assisting in a colour revolution-style coup in 2014 against the elected government in Kyiv, whose crime was being a little too sympathetic to Moscow.

    With the country in crisis, Zelensky was himself elected by Ukrainians as a peace candidate, there to end a brutal civil war — sparked by that coup — between anti-Russian, “nationalistic” forces in the country’s west and ethnic Russian populations in the east. The Ukrainian President soon broke that promise.

    Trump has accused Zelensky of being a “dictator”. But if he is, it is only because Washington wanted him that way, ignoring the wishes of the majority of Ukrainians.

    Reddest of red lines
    Zelensky’s job was to play a game of chicken with Moscow. The assumption was that the US would win whatever the outcome.

    Either Russian President Vladimir Putin’s bluff would be called. Ukraine would be welcomed into Nato, becoming the most forward of the alliance’s forward bases against Russia, allowing nuclear-armed ballistic missiles to be stationed minutes from Moscow.

    Or Putin would finally make good on his years of threats to invade his neighbour to stop Nato crossing the reddest of red lines he had set over Ukraine.

    Washington could then cry “self-defence” on Ukraine’s behalf, and ludicrously fearmonger Western publics about Putin eyeing Poland, Germany, France and Britain next.

    Those were the pretexts for arming Kyiv to the hilt, rather than seeking a rapid peace deal. And so began a proxy war of attrition against Russia, using Ukrainian men as cannon fodder.

    The aim was to wear Russia down militarily and economically, and bring about Putin’s overthrow.

    Zelensky did precisely what was demanded of him. When he appeared to waver early on, and considered signing a peace deal with Moscow, Britain’s prime minister of the time, Boris Johnson, was dispatched with a message from Washington: keep fighting.

    That is the same Boris Johnson who now breezily admits that the West is fighting a “proxy war” against Russia.

    Hmm, maybe someone can help me.

    How was Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine entirely ‘unprovoked’, when the British leader in charge at the time, Boris Johnson, now admits Nato viewed Ukraine as the battlefield for a ‘proxy war’ against Russia? 🤯 pic.twitter.com/VS6jRE03gH

    — Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) February 24, 2025

    His comments have generated precisely no controversy. That is particularly strange, given that critics who pointed this very obvious fact out three years ago were instantly denounced for spreading “Putin disinformation” and Kremlin “talking points”.

    For his obedience, Zelensky was feted a hero, the defender of Europe against Russian imperialism. His every “demand” — demands that originated in Washington — was met.

    Ukraine has received at least $250 billion worth of guns, tanks, fighter jets, training for his troops, Western intelligence on Russia, and other forms of aid.

    Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian and Russian men have paid with their lives — as have the families they leave behind.

    Mafia etiquette
    Now the old Don in Washington is gone. The new Don has decided Zelensky has been an expensive failure. Russia isn’t lethally wounded. It’s stronger than ever. Time for a new strategy.

    Zelensky, still imagining he was Washington’s favourite henchman, arrived at the Oval Office only to be taught a harsh lesson in mafia etiquette.

    Trump is spinning his stab in the back as a “peace agreement”. And in some sense, it is. Rightly, Trump has concluded that Russia has won — unless the West is ready to fight World War III and risk a potential nuclear war.

    Trump has faced up to the reality of the situation, even if Zelensky and Europe are still struggling to.


    Trump’s overt ‘genocidal’ warning over Gaza.   Video: TRT World News

    But his plan for Ukraine is actually just a variation of his other peace plan — the one for Gaza. There he wants to ethnically cleanse the Palestinian population and, on the bodies of the enclave’s many thousands of dead children, build the “Riviera of the Middle East” — or “Trump Gaza” as it is being called in a surreal video he shared on social media.

    In telling the “people of Gaza”, they will be “DEAD” if the hostages aren’t released – something they can’t decide – Trump is expressing clear genocidal intent. He’a also sending the arms to make that genocide possible.

    He needs to be in the ICC dock alongside Netanyahu. pic.twitter.com/eomkGP6eWe

    — Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) March 6, 2025

    Similarly, Trump now sees Ukraine not as a military battlefield but as an economic one where, through clever deal-making, he can leverage riches for himself and his billionaire pals.

    He has put a gun to Zelensky and Europe’s head. Make a deal with Russia to end the war, or you are on your own against a far superior military power. See if the Europeans can help you without a supply of Washington’s weapons.

    Not surprisingly, Zelensky, Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron huddled together at the weekend to find a deal that would appease Trump. All Starmer has revealed so far is that the plan will “stop the fighting”.

    That is a good thing. But the fighting could have been stopped, and should have been stopped, three years ago.

    Money, not peace
    It is deeply unwise to be lulled into tribalism by all this — the very tribalism Western elites seek to cultivate among their publics to keep us treating international affairs no differently from a high-stakes football match.

    No one here has behaved, or is behaving, honourably.

    A ceasefire in Ukraine is not about peace. It’s about money, just as the earlier war was. As all wars are, ultimately.

    An acceptable ceasefire for Trump, as well as for Putin, will involve a carve-up of Ukraine’s goodies. Rare earth minerals, land, agricultural production will be the real currency driving the agreement.

    Zelensky now understands this. He knows that he, and the people of Ukraine, have been scammed. That is what tends to happen when you cosy up to the mafia.

    If anyone doubts Washington’s insincerity over Ukraine, look to Palestine for clarity.

    In his earlier presidency, Trump tried to bring about what he termed the peace “deal of the century” whose centrepiece was the annexation of much of the Occupied West Bank.

    The hope was that the Gulf states would ultimately fund an incentivisation programme — the carrot to Israel’s stick — to encourage Palestinians to make a new life in a giant, purpose-built industrial zone in Sinai, next to Gaza.

    That plan is still simmering away in the background. At the weekend, Israel received a green light from Washington to revive its genocidal starvation of Gaza’s population, after Israel refused to negotiate the second phase of the original ceasefire agreement.

    The Trump administration and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are now spinning their own bad faith as Hamas “rejectionism”.

    They and the echo chamber that is the Western media are blaming the Palestinian group for refusing to be gulled into an “extension” of what was never more than a phoney ceasefire — Israel’s fire never ceased. Israel wants all the hostages back, without having to leave Gaza, so that Hamas has no leverage to stop Israel reviving the full genocide.

    The people of Gaza are still being fed into the Washington mafia’s meatgrinder, just as the Ukrainian people have been.

    Trump wants them out of the way so he can develop a Mediterranean playground for the rich, paid for with Gulf oil money and the so-far untapped natural gas reserves just off Gaza’s coast.

    Unlike his predecessors, Trump doesn’t pretend that Ukraine and Gaza are anything more than geostrategic real estate for Washington.

    The big shakedown
    Zelensky’s shakedown did not come out of the blue. Trump and his officials had been flagging it well in advance.

    Two weeks ago, the industrial correspondent for Britain’s Daily Telegraph wrote an article headlined “Here’s why Trump wants to make Ukraine a US economic colony”.

    Trump’s team believes that Ukraine may have rare-earth minerals under the ground worth some $15 trillion — a treasure trove that will be critical to the development of the next generation of technology.

    In their view, controlling the exploration and extraction of those minerals will be as important as control over the Middle East’s oil reserves was more than a century ago.

    And most important of all, the US wants China, its chief economic — if not military — rival excluded from the plunder. China currently has an effective monopoly on many of these critical minerals.

    Or as the Telegraph puts it, Ukraine’s “minerals offer a tantalising promise: the ability for the US to break its dependence on Chinese supplies of critical minerals that go into everything from wind turbines to iPhones and stealth fighter jets”.

    A draft of the plan seen by the Telegraph would, in its words, “amount to the US economic colonisation of Ukraine, in legal perpetuity”.

    Washington wants first refusal on all deposits within the country.

    At their Oval Office confrontation, Trump reiterated this goal: “So we’re going to be using that [Ukraine’s rare earth minerals], taking it, using it for all of the things we do, including AI, and including weapons, and the military. And it’s really going to very much satisfy our needs.”

    All of this means that Trump has a keen incentive to get the war finished as quickly as possible, and Russia’s territorial advance halted. The more territory Moscow seizes, the less territory is left for the US to plunder.

    Self-sabotage
    The battle against China over rare-earth minerals isn’t a Trump innovation either — and adds an additional layer of context for why Washington and Nato have been so keen over the past two decades to prise Ukraine away from Russia.

    Last summer, a Congressional select committee on competition with China announced the formation of a working group to counter Beijing’s “dominance of critical minerals”.

    The chairman of the committee, John Moolenaar, noted that the current US dependence on China for these minerals “would quickly become an existential vulnerability in the event of a conflict”.

    Another committee member, Rob Wittman, observed: “Dominance over global supply chains for critical mineral and rare earth elements is the next stage of great power competition.”

    What Trump appears to appreciate is that Nato’s proxy war against Russia in Ukraine has, by default, driven Moscow deeper into Beijing’s embrace. It has been self-sabotage on a grand scale.

    Together, China and Russia are a formidable opponent, and one at the centre of the ever-growing Brics group — comprised of Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. They have been seeking to expand their alliance by adding emerging powers to become a counterweight to Washington and Nato’s bullying global agenda.

    But a deal with Putin over Ukraine would provide an opportunity for Washington to build a new security architecture in Europe — one more useful to the US — that places Russia inside the tent rather than outside it.

    That would leave China isolated — a long-time Pentagon goal.

    And it would also leave Europe less central to the projection of US power, which is why European leaders — led by Keir Starmer — have been looking and sounding so unnerved over the past few weeks.

    The danger is that Trump’s “peacemaking” in Ukraine simply becomes a prelude to the fomenting of a war against China, using Taiwan as the pretext in the same way Ukraine was used against Russia.

    As Moolenaar implied, US control over critical minerals — in Ukraine and elsewhere — would ensure the US was no longer vulnerable in the event of a war with China to losing access to the minerals it would need to continue the war. It would free Washington’s hand.

    Trump may be behaving in a vulgar manner. But the gangster empire he now heads is conducting the same global shakedown as ever.

    Jonathan Cook is an award-winning British journalist. He was based in Nazareth, Israel, for 20 years and returned to the UK in 2021. He is the author of three books on the Israel-Palestine conflict, including Disappearing Palestine: Israel’s Experiments in Human Despair (2008). In 2011, Cook was awarded the Martha Gellhorn Special Prize for Journalism for his work on Palestine and Israel. This article was first published in Middle East Eye and is republished with the author’s permission.

    This article was first published on Café Pacific.

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: City and Regional Deals – opportunity for growth

    Source: New Zealand Government

    The Government’s City and Regional Deals initiative has received a great response from regions across New Zealand, and is now into the assessment stage to determine which regions will be the first to progress towards a deal, Local Government Minister Simon Watts and Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop say.
    Councils were asked to work together to form regions and to outline, via a light-touch proposal, how a deal of up to five priority projects would unlock economic growth in their area. Regions had until 28 February 2025 to submit their light-touch proposals to the Department of Internal Affairs.
    “The Government has been clear that driving economic growth is a core focus for our Government with our regions playing a key role in delivering that plan. City and Regional Deals will be relentlessly focused on driving our growth agenda,” Mr Bishop says.
    “New Zealand has a massive infrastructure deficit. Water pipes are bursting, roads have been falling apart, and there simply aren’t enough houses. Our Government is relentlessly focussed on reducing the infrastructure deficit within this country.” 
    “With a growing population, it is critically important we are delivering the long-term infrastructure we need for growth. City and Regional Deals is designed to help reduce New Zealand’s infrastructure deficit through unlocking productivity, attracting investment, and improving connectivity across the country.
    “Delivering a joint long-term vision for regions will ensure they remain focused on delivering what matters most to ratepayers, including critical infrastructure like housing and transport.”
    “The positive response from regions across the country demonstrates the value councils see in the programme and that central and local government agree that through collaboration we can accelerate long-term vision realisation in our regions and cities. This is critical to accelerate economic growth and productivity,” Mr Watts says.
    “I have made it clear to councils that I expect them to demonstrate how each initiative would connect to other projects and other government priorities, such as Local Water Done Well. I look forward to seeing the details of each proposal.”
    City and Regional Deals light-touch proposals will now be assessed against the criteria outlined in the strategic framework. The results of the assessment will be provided to Ministers for consideration. The Government will decide which regions progress towards a deal with the intention to have the first deal concluded by the end of 2025. It is expected that three deals will be in place by October 2026.     
    More information about City and Regional Deals can be found at www.dia.govt.nz/Regional-Deals. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Volcano Watch — When have lava fountains formed on Kīlauea and what are their hazards?

    Source: US Geological Survey

    Volcano Watch is a weekly article and activity update written by U.S. Geological Survey Hawaiian Volcano Observatory scientists and affiliates.

    Lava fountains during the 1959 Kīlauea Iki eruption (upper left), 1969 Maunulu eruption (upper right), 1983 Puʻuʻōʻō eruption (lower left), and the ongoing summit eruption in Halemaʻumaʻu (lower right). USGS images. 

    Even more recently, fissure 8 of the 2018 lower East Rift Zone eruption exhibited a continuous lava fountain for over two months. However, the lava fountain at fissure 8 differed from episodic lava fountains occurring recently at Kīlauea summit. The continuous fissure 8 lava fountains were primarily driven by a pressure gradient as magma moved from storage chambers beneath the summit to erupt out of the low-elevation vent on the flank of the volcano. 

    Episodic lava fountains are driven by changes in pressurization, related to new magma being supplied. As new magma accumulates, the amount of pressure builds. Eventually, lava erupts and de-pressurizes the system. As magma rises to the surface, magmatic gas rapidly exsolves as bubbles—just like when you open a bottle of soda or champagne.  This gas is a major driving force of the lava fountaining, and the pieces of lava found around the crater rim are filled with bubbles, resembling a stiff foam. 

    Many people remember the 1983–2018 middle East Rift Zone of eruption of Puʻuʻōʻō for the accessible lava flows on the coastal plain and ocean entries. But the first three years of the Puʻuʻōʻō eruption were characterized by 44 lava fountaining episodes that built a prominent cinder- and spatter-cone vent standing 835 feet (255 meters) above the surrounding landscape. Lava fountaining episodes during this eruption occurred every 3–4 weeks and lasted about a day.  Reaching heights up to 1,500 feet (460 meters), the lava fountains fed lava flows that traveled downslope. Some of the lava flows reached the Royal Gardens subdivision and destroyed several houses. 

    At the start of the Maunaulu eruption in 1969, twelve lava fountaining episodes occurred in the upper East Rift Zone. Each lava fountaining episode generally lasted for several hours, slowly building in height until a maximum height was reached, after which the fountains died within minutes. Fountains from Maunaulu reached up to 1,770 feet (540 meters). Lava flows fed by Maunaulu fountains traveled downslope, once going more than 12 miles (7.5 kilometers) to eventually enter the ocean. 

    The short but spectacular Kīlauea Iki eruption occurred in the crater just northeast of Kaluapele, the summit caldera. From November 14 to December 20, 1959, there were 17 episodes of lava fountaining that filled in the Kīlauea Iki Crater with 440 feet (135 meters) of lava. The longest episode was 6 days and episode 15 of the eruption included the highest lava fountains yet measured on Kīlauea, reaching staggering heights of 1,900 feet (580 meters). These high lava fountains built the prominent Puʻupuaʻi cinder cone, which you can view on the Devastation Trail in Hawaiʻi Volcanoes National Park. 

    Hazards associated with lava fountaining include the fallout materials (termed tephra), volcanic gas emissions, and lava flows. Tephra generally accumulates in the area immediately downwind of the vent and can build features such as cinder cones. Changes in wind direction and speeds can result in these particles being wafted greater distances to impact nearby communities. Like all eruptions, increased volcanic gas emissions associated with lava fountains creates volcanic air pollution (vog), which affects regions downwind.  When lava fountain events occur on the flanks, they feed lava flows that travel downslope, and destroy everything in their path. 

    The ongoing eruption is occurring within Halemaʻumaʻu, with lava flows contained in the summit caldera. Trade winds transport tephra and gas emissions to the southwest, away from the closest communities, but changes in wind conditions may result in Pele’s Hair and vog in areas that include Hawaiʻi Volcanoes National Park and nearby communities. 

    Lava fountains in the ongoing Kīlauea summit eruption haven’t reached “high” fountain heights of over 1,000 feet (305 meters). So far, there have been 12 episodes of lava fountaining in the ongoing Kīlauea summit eruption—the same number as Maunaulu. Continuing inflation suggests this eruption will likely continue, but whether it catches up to Kīlauea Iki or Puʻuʻōʻō, in terms of the number of episodes or fountain heights, remains to be seen. 

    Volcano Activity Updates

    Kīlauea has been erupting episodically within the summit caldera since December 23, 2024. Its USGS Volcano Alert level is WATCH.

    The summit eruption at Kīlauea volcano that began in Halemaʻumaʻu crater on December 23 continued over the past week, with one eruptive episode. Episode 12 was active from the morning of March 4 until the morning of March 5. Kīlauea summit has been inflating since episode 11 ended, suggesting that another eruptive episode is possible. Sulfur dioxide emission rates are elevated in the summit region during active eruption episodes. No unusual activity has been noted along Kīlauea’s East Rift Zone or Southwest Rift Zone. 

    Mauna Loa is not erupting. Its USGS Volcano Alert Level is at NORMAL.

    Four earthquakes were reported felt in the Hawaiian Islands during the past week: a M3.2 earthquake 11 km (6 mi) S of Hala‘ula at 20 km (12 mi) depth on March 4 at 3:00 p.m. HST, a M3.0 earthquake 6 km (3 mi) ENE of Honoka‘a at -1 km (0 mi) depth on March 2 at 4:25 a.m. HST, a M3.6 earthquake 31 km (19 mi) SSW of Hana at 29 km (18 mi) depth on March 1 at 7:34 p.m. HST, and a M3.0 earthquake 12 km (7 mi) SSE of Fern Forest at 7 km (4 mi) depth on March 1 at 7:19 p.m. HST.

    HVO continues to closely monitor Kīlauea and Mauna Loa.

    Please visit HVO’s website for past Volcano Watch articles, Kīlauea and Mauna Loa updates, volcano photos, maps, recent earthquake information, and more. Email questions to askHVO@usgs.gov.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Israeli army kills 3 Palestinians in Gaza City

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    People try to receive food relief during Ramadan in Gaza City, on March 4, 2025. [Photo/Xinhua]

    The Israeli army on Thursday killed three Palestinians in the east of Gaza City, according to Palestinian sources and eyewitnesses.

    “The attack targeted a group of people near the Al-Tawfiq Mosque in the Al-Shuja’iyya neighborhood, in the northern Gaza Strip,” the sources told Xinhua.

    “One person was killed instantly, while three others were critically wounded. They were taken to the Baptist Hospital in central Gaza City, where two later died from their injuries,” the sources added.

    Israeli army spokesman Avichay Adraee confirmed the strike, saying that the army had identified individuals “attempting to plant an explosive device” near its forces in northern Gaza and launched an airstrike to eliminate the threat.

    Palestinian sources rejected the Israeli claims, saying the victims were civilians returning to check on and repair their homes, which had been damaged during the war.

    The incident came amid ongoing tensions in Gaza as negotiations for the second phase of a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas remain stalled.

    According to Gaza-based health authorities, since the Israel-Hamas conflict began on Oct. 7, 2023, the reported death toll has reached 48,446, with 111,852 injured.

    MIL OSI China News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: A late start, then a big boom: why it took until 1975 for Australians to finally watch TV in colour

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Gaunson, Associate Professor in Cinema Studies, RMIT University

    Youtube/Austvarchive

    Some 50 years ago, on March 1 1975, Australian television stations officially moved to colour.

    Networks celebrated the day, known as “C-Day”, with unique slogans such as “come to colour” (ABC TV), “Seven colours your world” (Seven Network), “living colour” (Nine Network) and “first in colour” (0-10 Network, which later became Network Ten). The ABC, Seven and Nine networks also updated their logos to incorporate colour.

    For most viewers, however, nothing looked much different. The majority owned a black and white TV, while a coloured broadcast required a colour TV set.

    Advertisers were initially reluctant to accept the change, which required them to re-shoot black and white commercials with colour stock at a significantly higher cost.

    Many reasoned viewers were still watching the ads in black and white. And initially this assumption was correct. But by nine months later, 17% of Australian homes had a colour receiver. This rose to 31% by July 1976.

    By 1978, 64% of Melbourne and 70% of Sydney households owned colour TV sets, making Australia one of the world’s fastest adopters of colour TV.

    According to the Federation of Australian Commercial Television Stations (FACTS) annual report for 1975–76, colour TV increased overall viewership by 5%, with people watching for longer periods.

    The 1976 Montreal Olympics also led to an increase in TV sales, with the colour broadcast shared between the ABC, Seven and Nine.

    Highlights from the Montreal 1976 Olympic Games marathon event.

    A late start

    With the United States introducing colour TV from 1954, it’s peculiar that Australia took so long to make the transition – especially since conversations about this had been underway since the 1960s.

    In 1965, a report outlining the process and economic considerations of transitioning to colour was tabled in parliament.

    Feedback from the US highlighted problems around broader acceptance in the marketplace. Colour TV sets were expensive and most programs were still being shot in black and white, despite the availability of colour.

    Networks were the most hesitant (even though they’d go on to become one of the most major benefactors). In 1969, it was estimated transitioning to colour would cost the ABC A$46 million (the equivalent of $265,709,944 today) over six years.

    The federal government, led by then prime minister Robert Menzies, decided to take a cautious approach to the transition – allowing manufacturers, broadcasters and the public time to prepare.

    The first colour “test” broadcast took place on June 15 1967, with live coverage of a Pakenham country horse racing event in Victoria (although few people would have had coloured TV sets at this point).

    Other TV shows also tested broadcasting in colour between 1972 and 1974, with limited colour telecasts aired from mid-1974. It wasn’t until March 1975 that colour TV was being transmitted permanently.

    ‘Aunty Jack Introduces Colour’ was a one-off television special of The Aunty Jack Show, broadcast on the ABC on February 28 1975.

    The cinema industry panics

    Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War created further urgency to televise in colour. With the war ending in April 1975, Australians watched the last moments in colour.

    Other significant events broadcast in colour that year included the December federal election, in which Malcolm Fraser defeated Gough Whitlam after the latter was dramatically dismissed as prime minister on November 11.

    With the public’s growing interest in colour TV, local manufacturers began lobbying for higher tariffs on imports to encourage domestic colour TV production.

    In the mid 1970s, a new colour set in Australia cost between $1,000 and $1,300, while the average full-time annual income was around $8,000. Still in the throes of a financial recession, customers began seeking out illegally-imported colour TV sets – which were appearing at car boot markets across the country.

    British childrens show The Wombles came to Australian screens shortly after colour TV was introduced.

    The government also created an advertising campaign warning the public of scammers who would offer to convert black-and-white TVs to colour. These door-to-door “salesmen” claimed to have a special screen which, when placed over a TV, would magically turn it colourful.

    By 1972, the estimated cost of upgrading broadcasting technology to colour had reached $116 million. The cinema industry, in a panic, even questioned whether colour TV could damage a viewer’s eyesight.

    The industry had previously suffered huge losses in cinema attendance with the introduction of black-and-white TV from 1956. Cinemas had a monopoly on colour and were petrified over what the introduction of colour to television could do to their attendances.

    Such fears were founded. In 1974 Australia had 68 million admissions to the cinema. By 1976, there were just 28.9 million admissions. Never again would yearly cinema admissions reach above 40 million.

    But despite the complaints – from the cinema industry, advertisers, broadcasters and manufacturers – audiences were ready for colour. And any network that dared to program in black and white would subject itself to a barrage of annoyed viewers.

    Colour TV was here to stay.

    Stephen Gaunson does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. A late start, then a big boom: why it took until 1975 for Australians to finally watch TV in colour – https://theconversation.com/a-late-start-then-a-big-boom-why-it-took-until-1975-for-australians-to-finally-watch-tv-in-colour-251363

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cortez Masto Leads Bipartisan Legislation to Ban Foreign Adversaries from Buying American Farmland

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Nevada Cortez Masto
    Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) and Mike Rounds (R-S.D.) reintroduced the Promoting Agriculture Safeguards and Security (PASS) Act, bipartisan legislation to ban individuals and entities controlled by China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea from purchasing agricultural land and businesses located near U.S. military installations or sensitive sites. The PASS Act is cosponsored by Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senators John Hoeven (R-N.D.) and Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.).
    “Nevada is home to many sensitive sites that are critical to our national security,” said Senator Cortez Masto. “It is common sense that we should not allow our foreign adversaries to buy agricultural land next to these locations. This bipartisan bill will keep Nevadans safe and protect American national security.”
    “Our near-peer adversaries such as China are looking for any possible opportunity to surveil our nation’s capabilities and resources,” said Senator Rounds. “One example occurred in 2021 when the Fufeng Group purchased 300 acres of land in North Dakota, located near the Grand Forks Air Force Base. We can’t risk this happening again. The PASS Act would prevent entities of foreign adversaries from purchasing agricultural land and businesses near our military bases and sensitive sites. I am hopeful that with President Trump’s recent National Security Presidential Memorandum on this issue, we can finally get it across the finish line.”
    Specifically, the PASS Act would:
    Ban purchases of agricultural land near military installations and sensitive sites by individuals/entities controlled by North Korea, China, Russia and Iran.
    Make the Secretary of Agriculture a voting member of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) for transactions involving the purchase of agricultural land, biotechnology, and any other transaction related to the agriculture industry in the United States.
    Give the U.S. Department of Agriculture the ability to refer cases to CFIUS for review if there is reason to believe an agriculture land transaction may raise a national security concern.
    The full text of the bill can be found here.
    Senator Cortez Masto has consistently advocated for strengthening American national security and standing up to our foreign adversaries. She recently introduced legislation to promote innovative businesses in direct competition with Communist China. Earlier this year, she introduced the HONOR Act to prevent businesses from claiming a foreign tax credit or deduction against taxes paid to fund the Russian government’s war machine. Cortez Masto has also led legislation to strengthen American partnership with Pacific Island nations to counter growing Chinese influence in the region.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: More than two-thirds of organisations have a formal work-from-home policy. Here’s how the benefits stack up

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christina Boedker, Professor, Business School, University of Newcastle

    Floral Deco/Shutterstock

    The opposition wants to call time on letting public servants work from home. In a speech to the Menzies Research Institute this week, shadow public service minister Jane Hume said, if elected, a Coalition government would require public servants in the office five days a week:

    While work from home arrangements can work, in the case of the [Australian Public Service], it has become a right that is creating inefficiency.

    Hume said Labor had given public servants a “blank cheque” to work from home, creating an “unsustainable” system that was no longer working.

    She stressed that exceptions “can and will be made”, but only “where they work for everyone rather than be enforced on teams by an individual”.

    Few workplace issues have drawn such heated debate as whether people should be allowed to work from home. The Coalition’s latest election promise, with parallels to a similar move by Donald Trump in the United States, has brought these questions back into the spotlight.

    What impact do work from home arrangements have, not only on performance and productivity but also employee wellbeing? Is it really wise to reverse course?

    Our research has examined these questions in detail – and we’ve found a changing picture.




    Read more:
    Dutton hints he’ll sack 36,000 public servants. Voters deserve to know what services will be affected


    Our research

    We have examined the impacts of working from home on staff performance and productivity in Australian workplaces as part of the Australian Workplace Index, surveying 2,932 Australian employees across 2022 and 2024.

    This is a research collaboration project between Australian National University and University of Newcastle.

    The Coalition argues public servants should return to the office.
    Ground Picture/Shutterstock

    An Australian Workplace Index 2022 working paper (which has not been peer-reviewed) actually suggested working from home was linked with a number of negative impacts.

    In 2022, we saw that compared to those who didn’t, employees who worked from home three to four days a week experienced lower wellbeing, higher depression and anxiety, and higher loneliness.

    They also experienced more administrative hassles, higher pressure to meet targets and increased levels of conflict with supervisors and colleagues.

    We found working from home was also associated with a reduction in staff productivity, job-target performance and an increase in staff turnover intentions.

    A changing picture

    We have recently completed analysis for a similar study based on data from 2024, to be published in an upcoming working paper. And it paints a very different picture.

    We found the negative impacts of working from home, originally found in 2022, had reversed in 2024.

    In the most recent 2024 Australian Workplace Index employment data, we see no significant difference in productivity between employees who work from home and those in the office.

    In fact, the latest data suggest numerous benefits.

    For example, staff who worked from home one or more days a week had 9.9% more autonomy in how they carried out their work. Those with higher job autonomy were up to 16.8% more productive in their work when compared to those with low job autonomy.

    We found staff who work from home also save on average 100 minutes in commuting time each day.

    But on top of this, staff who worked from home one or more days a week were 10.6% less burnt out from work compared to those who never did, and had reported lower intention to quit their jobs.

    A reduced need to commute is a major benefit of work-from-home arrangements.
    Adam Calaitzis/Shutterstock

    Better support for employees

    This positive trend likely reflects investment by employers in improving support for staff who work from home.

    In 2024, we found a majority of organisations (69%) now had a work-from-home policy in place.

    There was also an increase in the physical, technological and psychological infrastructure support available to staff who work from home. For example:

    • Physical: 82% of staff have a dedicated workspace, 93% have their own desk, and 93% have air conditioning.
    • Technological: 85% of staff have access to IT support, 94% have access to collaborative technology and 95% have internet access.
    • Psychological: 80% of staff have access to psychological support from their supervisor and 72% have access to counselling services.

    Importantly, employees still value the opportunity highly. Our 2024 data show 38% of Australian employees chose to work from home for 50% or more of their work hours.

    32% of Australian employees would prefer to exclusively work from home, 41% prefer a hybrid option, while 27% prefer to work exclusively from the office.

    Christina Boedker has received research grant funding from the University of Newcastle’s RSP Stimulus Funding Scheme and from The Australian National University for this research project.

    Kieron Meagher received research grant funding from the University of Newcastle’s RSP Stimulus Funding Scheme and from The Australian National University for this research project.

    Aeson Luiz Dela Cruz does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. More than two-thirds of organisations have a formal work-from-home policy. Here’s how the benefits stack up – https://theconversation.com/more-than-two-thirds-of-organisations-have-a-formal-work-from-home-policy-heres-how-the-benefits-stack-up-251598

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Sullivan, Murkowski Seek to Extend Alaska Native Vietnam-Era Veterans Allotment Program

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Alaska Dan Sullivan
    03.06.25
    WASHINGTON—U.S. Senators Dan Sullivan and Lisa Murkowski (both R-Alaska) have re-introduced legislation to extend the Alaska Native Vietnam-Era Veterans Land Allotment Program for five additional years. Without such an extension, the program will expire in December 2025 and potentially leave well over a thousand eligible Alaska Native Vietnam veterans and their heirs without their rightful land allotments.
    “While serving their country during the Vietnam War era, many Alaska Native veterans missed the deadline to apply for their legally entitled land allotment—an injustice that we are still working to fix nearly 70 years later,” said Senator Sullivan. “I’ve been working on this issue since I came into office. In 2019, President Trump signed into law a major lands package led by Senator Murkowski that included an allotment program I authored with a five-year window to apply. Unfortunately, throughout the implementation of this program, the Biden administration callously threw up endless regulatory hurdles and delays, dramatically limited the lands available for selection, and ended up delivering allotments to about 40 Alaskans out of more than 2,000 eligible veterans. We are reintroducing this legislation to extend this program and finally secure these land allotments for our courageous veterans who sacrificed greatly on behalf of our country. I look forward to working with the Trump administration to see this legislation signed into law and successfully implemented to fix this historic injustice and honor our Vietnam veterans’ heroic service.”
    “As thousands of Alaska Natives served our nation during the Vietnam War, they missed their opportunity to select the land allotments they are rightfully owed,” Senator Murkowski said. “With roughly 150 veterans remaining to be notified, and the pace of allotment certifications slower than we hoped it would be, an extension has become necessary—especially as we push to open additional lands closer to where many of these veterans and their families actually live.”
    The Alaska Native Vietnam-Era Veterans Land Allotment Program was established through a Sullivan-Murkowski provision in Murkowski’s 2019 lands package. The program has enabled thousands of Alaska Native veterans to apply for their congressionally-pledged land allotments, which can range from 2.5 to 160 acres, on certain Bureau of Land Management (BLM) lands in Alaska.
    As of February 13, 2025, BLM Alaska reported that it has received 453 applications for allotments and completed certifications for 41 of them. Hundreds of eligible veterans and their heirs—especially those who live in southeast, western, and northern Alaska—have not submitted applications because no lands are available within hundreds of miles of their place of residence or ancestral homelands.   
    Timeline:
    In 1906, Congress passed a law allowing Alaska Native individuals to acquire 160-acre parcels of land.
    In 1971, at a time when many Alaska Native men were serving in the military during the Vietnam War, the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) extinguished the 1906 allotment rights.
    In 1998, the Alaska congressional delegation secured legislation to partially fix the injustice of Alaska Native veterans who missed the chance to apply for an allotment. However, due to certain restrictions, only about 500 veterans ultimately applied out more than 3,000 who were eligible.
    On February 12, 2019, the Senate passed Sen. Murkowski’s S.47, the National Resources Management Act, including a Sen. Sullivan provision to establish the Alaska Native Vietnam Veteran Land Allotment Program. The late Congressman Don Young (R-Alaska) shepherded the legislation through the House.
    On March 12, 2019, President Donald Trump signed S.47, and the Trump administration began working on its implementation.
    In January 2021, then-Interior Secretary David Bernhardt signed the revocation of 11 outdated public land orders (PLOs) issued in 1972 and 1973 that were put in place to allow Alaska Native Corporations to select lands promised to them by Congress 50 years ago. This important step allowed for the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to revoke the PLOs.
    In 2021, Senator Sullivan met twice with Secretary Haaland prior to her confirmation vote to be the Secretary of Interior. In both meetings, she committed to rapidly implement the Alaska Native Vietnam Veteran Land Allotment Program. She subsequently refused to follow through on this commitment.
    In February 2021, members of the Alaska congressional delegation condemned the Biden administration Department of the Interior’s (DOI) action to postpone the revocation of PLOs signed by former Interior Secretary Bernhardt.
    In April 2021, in a unilateral and unnecessary action, the BLM postponed the PLO revocations, requiring further environmental analysis on five public land orders with a two-year stay on the implementation of the PLO revocations.
    On May 7, 2021, Sen. Sullivan and Gov. Mike Dunleavy (R-Alaska) penned an op-ed in the Juneau Empire outlining the State of Alaska’s legislative effort to make state lands available to eligible Alaska Native veterans.
    In June 2021, Sens. Sullivan and Murkowski introduced legislation to amend the Alaska Native Vietnam Veteran Land Allotment Program and make an additional 3.7 million acres of federal land in the National Wildlife Refuge System available for selection.
    On April 18, 2022, Sens. Sullivan and Murkowski sent a letter to Secretary Haaland urging her to lift the PLOs that would make over 28 million acres of federal land available for selection by eligible veterans or their heirs.
    On April 21, 2022, Sen. Sullivan disputed Secretary Haaland’s claim that she is “[moving] expeditiously to deliver on [her] promise” to Alaska Native Vietnam-era veterans as she accepted a “Finding of No Significant Impact” (FONSI) from the acting Alaska BLM director on the Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Alaska Native Vietnam Veteran Land Allotment Program.
    In February 2023, Sens. Sullivan and Murkowski reintroduced S.175, legislation to codify the revocation of the five PLOs signed during the Trump administration and undoing the Biden administration’s efforts to unfairly halt access to federal public lands in Alaska.
    In April 2023, Sen. Sullivan condemned Interior Secretary Deb Haaland’s decision to order a new full environmental impact statement (EIS), which delays the implementation of the allotment program even further.
    On August 10, 2023, Sen. Sullivan criticized Secretary Haaland’s announcement of a PLO to open about 812,000 additional acres of public lands managed by BLM Alaska for selection, noting that the “new” land has already been spoken for by the state, and the decision will result in more delays and legal hurdles for eligible veterans.
    In February 2024, Sens. Sullivan and Murkowski introduced S.3790, which would extend the program for another five years before its expiration in December 2025. The bill passed the Senate by unanimous consent on the final day of the 118th Congress, but did not clear the House of Representatives.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Baldwin, Collins Introduce Bipartisan Legislation to Support the Health and Wellbeing of Family Caregivers

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Wisconsin Tammy Baldwin

    WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and Susan Collins (R-ME) introduced bipartisan legislation to support the health and wellbeing of family caregivers. The Lifespan Respite Care Reauthorization Act of 2025 would reauthorize the Lifespan Respite Care program through fiscal year 2030.

    “I was proud to serve as the primary caregiver for my grandmother as she got older, which is why I understand firsthand the financial and emotional strain of taking care of a loved one,” said Senator Baldwin. “I’m proud to work with Republicans and Democrats to deliver some much-needed relief and support for family caregivers so that when Americans step up to keep their loved ones safe and well at home, they can be confident we have their backs.”

    “Caregivers provide an estimated $600 billion in uncompensated care each year. Yet, an astounding 85 percent of caregivers have not received any respite services at all. I saw this in my own family, where my mother took care of my father who was suffering from Alzheimer’s disease for eight years. Respite care was almost nonexistent for her, other than that provided by family members,” said Senator Collins. “Respite care helps to reduce mental stress and physical health issues that caregivers may experience, keeping them healthy and families intact. This bill would help give family caregivers and their loved ones the support they need by ensuring that quality respite is available and accessible.”

    Specifically, the Lifespan Respite Care Reauthorization Act of 2025 would:

    1. Reauthorize the Lifespan Respite Care program at current appropriations levels for five years (FY25-30); and
    2. Clarify that youth caregivers (those under 18 who are providing care or helping to provide care to family members) are eligible for the program.

    According to AARP, more than a third of family caregivers report wanting support like respite services, yet only 14 percent receive them, even as research indicates that caregivers who use respite have lower caregiver distress and better health and sense of well-being.

    Respite care provides temporary relief to caregivers from their ongoing responsibilities. By protecting the health of caregivers, respite care decreases the need for professional long-term care and allows individuals who require care to remain at home. To date, 38 states have received funding through the Lifespan Respite Care program, which provides competitive grants to states to establish or enhance statewide respite resources and help ensure that quality respite is available and accessible to all family caregivers.

    Senators Baldwin and Collins championed legislation in 2020 to authorize the Lifespan Respite Care program through fiscal year 2024. The Lifespan Respite Care Reauthorization Act of 2025 would reauthorize this programming through fiscal year 2030.

    In addition to the ARCH National Respite Coalition, this bill is endorsed by the Autism Society of America and the Alzheimer’s Association.

    Full text of the legislation can be found here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Padilla, Markey Introduce Bipartisan, Bicameral Bill to Secure Fair Pay for Truckers Working Overtime

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Alex Padilla (D-Calif.)

    Padilla, Markey Introduce Bipartisan, Bicameral Bill to Secure Fair Pay for Truckers Working Overtime

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) and Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), along with U.S. Representatives Mark Takano (D-Calif.-39) and Jeff Van Drew (R-N.J.-02), introduced bipartisan, bicameral legislation to ensure that truckers are compensated fairly for the hours that they are on the clock, including overtime. The Guaranteeing Overtime for Truckers Act would repeal the motor carrier provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, which excludes many truckers from overtime protections enjoyed by other workers.

    In response to an Executive Order by former President Biden, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued a Freight and Logistics Supply Chain Assessment in February 2022, which highlights high turnover rates and compensation issues in the trucking industry. Among its recommendations, the Department called on Congress to repeal the motor carrier provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to allow truckers to earn fair overtime pay.

    “America’s truck drivers are on the frontlines of our economy, enduring long hours away from home, and all too often, unpaid wait times at congested ports and warehouses. Unfortunately, truck drivers have been excluded from overtime pay protections for decades,” said Senator Padilla. “If truckers are forced to wait while on the job, they should be paid. This is not just a matter of fairness; it’s a matter of public safety. Experienced truckers are safer truckers, and better compensation and overtime pay will help more of them stay in the profession.”

    “Truck drivers are the engines of our economy, making sure that our supply chain keeps moving at full speed, and yet they are denied the fundamental worker protection of overtime. The Guaranteeing Overtime for Truckers Act would reverse this injustice and ensure that truck drivers are paid their due,” said Senator Markey.

    “Truckers are vital for our supply chain, manufacturing, and the American way of life,” said Representative Takano. “It is unfair that they are singled out as somehow unworthy of overtime pay. This legislation will help right that wrong and make sure they are fairly compensated for the hours they work. I am proud to partner with Congressman Van Drew and Senator Padilla to build up workers and guarantee more money in their paychecks.”

    “Truck drivers keep our supply chain moving, often working long, exhausting hours to make sure goods get where they need to go,” said Representative Van Drew. “But right now, they are not guaranteed overtime pay like most other workers. It is just not right. The Guaranteeing Overtime for Truckers Act is a simple fix—it ensures that truckers are fairly compensated for the extra hours they put in. These men and women do critical work, and it’s time we make sure their pay reflects that.”

    “The exclusion of truck drivers from federal overtime protections must come to an end,” said Teamsters General President Sean M. O’Brien. “The Teamsters Union is proud to support the Guaranteeing Overtime for Truckers Act, which will right the decades long wrong that serves only to harm drivers to the benefit of their employers.”

    “America’s truckers are the backbone of our economy, keeping goods moving and ensuring our supply chain stays strong,” said Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association President Todd Spencer. “Yet, despite their essential role, trucking remains one of the few professions in America denied guaranteed overtime pay. It’s long past time the hard work of the men and women behind the wheel are fairly compensated. By discounting a trucker’s time, ‘big trucking’ has driven wages downward, treating truckers as disposable rather than the skilled professionals they are. We appreciate Representative Van Drew, Representative Takano, and Senator Padilla for championing the bipartisan GOT Truckers Act, which will right this wrong by securing overtime pay. This legislation is an investment in truckers, road safety, and the strength of America’s supply chain.”

    In addition to Senators Padilla and Markey, the legislation is cosponsored by Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Ron Wyden (D-Ore.).

    The Guaranteeing Overtime for Truckers Act is supported by Teamsters and the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association.

    Senator Padilla is a longtime advocate for improving workplace safety standards and helping workers secure fair wages. In the aftermath of the Southern California fires, Padilla introduced the bipartisan Firefighter Paycheck Protection Act to protect wildland firefighter pay and provide long-term workforce stability. Additionally, he introduced the Wildland Firefighter Fair Pay Act to permanently raise the caps on overtime premium pay for federal wildland firefighters. Previously, Padilla introduced the Fairness for Farm Workers Act, legislation to update the nation’s labor laws to ensure farm workers receive fairer wages and compensation. In 2023, Padilla announced the Asunción Valdivia Heat, Illness, Injury and Fatality Prevention Act to protect the safety and health of workers who are exposed to dangerous heat conditions in the workplace. Padilla is also a proud cosponsor of the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act of 2025.

    Full text of the bill is available here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Release: Labour outlines priorities of next Govt

    Source: New Zealand Labour Party

    The next Labour Government will prioritise jobs, health and homes so Kiwis and Kiwi businesses have the opportunity to thrive.

    • Jobs – a fair economy with secure jobs that pay a decent wage
    • Health – a quality public health system supporting healthy communities.
    • Homes – a place to live and a great start for our kids

    “The cost-of-living crunch is still hitting New Zealanders hard. Prices are going up, wage growth is stagnant and more people are unemployed or about to lose their jobs,” Labour leader Chris Hipkins said.

    “The Luxon Government does not have a vision or a plan for New Zealand. Buzz words and corporate waffle will not lift incomes, fix our health system or build more homes.

    “Labour will not sell our pristine landscapes for a quick buck. We won’t lay off thousands of people, and cripple sectors for the sake of politics. We won’t sit idly by watching unemployment grow and families to suffer as a result.

    “We have listened, and we know what New Zealanders want. Clear on our objectives, Labour will be ready to govern in 2026, with policy development well underway to ensure jobs, health and homes are attainable for all New Zealanders.

    “New Zealand can have a strong economy that also supports people in work and pays them well. We can invest in the long-term infrastructure our country needs, while ensuring our health and education systems don’t keel over. We can ensure people have access to quality homes and Kiwi kids get a great start to life.

    “Labour’s new economic team, led by Barbara Edmonds is a signal to New Zealanders that we are serious about tackling the big issues and making change for the better. The team will get cracking immediately on new policy.

    “A Labour Government I lead will get the balance right to ensure New Zealand businesses can thrive and our economy can do well, while growing wages and jobs for everyone,” Chris Hipkins said. 


    Stay in the loop by signing up to our mailing list and following us on Facebook, Instagram, and X.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Release: Chris Hipkins’ State of the Nation address

    Source: New Zealand Labour Party

    I want to start by acknowledging Simon Bridges and all the members of the Auckland Chamber – thank you for hosting us here today.

    Mayor Wayne Brown, union and business leaders, my deputy Carmel Sepuloni and all my Labour colleagues – thank you for taking the time to be here.

    Today, I want to talk to you about the challenges and opportunities ahead and set out the priorities for a new Labour Government.

    After 18 months of chaos and broken promises, we need a stable government that is relentlessly focused on making New Zealand better.

    For everyone. 

    One that is driven forward by clear, focused objectives; that works with people and business, instead of talking them down.

    A government that will put the politics of division aside and brings people together to do what’s right.

    A government that goes to work every single day and fights for you.

    That’s the government I will lead – and today I will tell you what it will be focused on.

    ***

    Politics at its best changes lives. It’s why I got into it in the first place.

    It lifts people up.

    It unites hope and action to build the future we all want that works for all of us.

    It doesn’t ignore the challenges we face, or blame someone else, and then at the last possible moment come up with half-baked solutions.

    It focuses on real solutions; solutions that work, not empty slogans.

    It reflects people’s hopes, not the mess and division currently resident in the Beehive.

    If we’re going to make progress on the things we care about, the things that really affect people’s lives, then we need to be the antidote to that division.

    Last year I was one of the tens of thousands of people who came together in a single voice to protect the promises woven into the fabric of Aotearoa New Zealand.

    Toitū Te Tiriti Hikoi showed beyond doubt the pride we have in who we are.

    That solving the challenges we face depends on us being able to listen to each other, see ourselves in each other, and find common ground.

    Regardless of where we come from, what we look like, or what’s in our bank account, we all have the same worries; the same hopes for ourselves and our children, the same commitment to making this the best possible country it can be.

    That common ground must be the foundation of our journey ahead. 

    ***

    One of the best parts of my job is travelling around the country meeting people from all walks of life.

    It is a real privilege to be welcomed into their lives and to have the time to understand their hopes and concerns about the future.

    Usually there are two stories they tell. 

    The first is a story of ambition.

    The ambition they have for themselves, their kids, and their communities. 

    Whether it’s hearing about the successful local businesses serving their community despite a Prime Minister talking their efforts down.

    Or the innovation and ingenuity happening all over the country.

    The ideas and entrepreneurship that are creating new opportunities to make life better for all of us. 

    I see the teachers working tirelessly to give our kids the education they deserve.

    The nurses going above and beyond to look after our loved ones.  

    The volunteers and community organisations restoring local native wildlife, and those making sure their neighbours don’t go hungry.

    But I also hear people’s genuine and legitimate concern for what the future holds.

    Far too many people are worried that their kids or their grandkids will be among the record numbers of people leaving New Zealand.

    They’re concerned that once this Government has finished selling off our schools and hospitals to the highest bidder, there will be nothing left to pass on.

    I hear about the people sitting around the kitchen table looking through the bills trying to make it all add up, wondering how they are going to plan for the future.

    This is what the cost of living does. It makes it harder for us to focus on what’s ahead. It intrudes on the little things we love.

    Taking the kids out for the day; a weekend trip to catch up with loved ones; picking up a Friday night treat in the supermarket, only to put it back on the shelf.

    ***

    No matter how trivial and small politics seems sometimes, I know that the stakes for families and communities up and down New Zealand couldn’t be bigger.

    Our schools and hospitals are run down and in desperate need of investment.

    Our homes are unaffordable. The cost of everything – from keeping the house warm to the weekly groceries – is too high.

    People’s chance of success is more closely tied to what they inherit than what they earn through their own hard work.

    It would be easy for me to stand here and blame everything on National. But the reality is that some of the problems we face go back decades.

    For too long, we’ve looked for quick fixes and easy answers, rather than dealing with the underlying problems.

    This government is a case in point. Their choices have made our problems deeper, longer lasting and more painful.

    Eighteen months has been more than enough time for Christopher Luxon to make clear to people why this government is in power and what it wants to do.

    So, what does New Zealand have to show for it?

    A country more divided than ever.

    A recession. A recession made worse by the choice to cut jobs and prioritise tax cuts for landlords.

    Cancelled ferries.

    Too many kids going hungry at school.

    I’m not going to do the whole list. I haven’t got time. But doesn’t it make clear where this government’s priorities are?

    Ask yourself this: do I feel better off today than I did 18 months ago?

    This government is turning New Zealand into a game only a few can afford to play. And the long-term costs will far outweigh the short-term benefits.

    And what does that say about the so-called “tough choices” Christopher Luxon has made over the last year and half.

    What about the choice to prioritise tax cuts for landlords ahead of supporting the thousands of people all over New Zealand who spend all day on their feet, struggling to earn enough to pay the bills.

    Brave, committed, hardworking people teaching our kids, caring for our loved ones, running small businesses, cleaning our offices. 

    It just cannot be right that with every passing month, their lives get harder and harder, as those at the top amass ever greater wealth.

    Some of you in the audience might be landlords yourself, and I can understand why. If you’ve got equity behind you, buying investment properties has been a good way to make money.

    But I’d encourage you to all ask yourselves a pretty important question:

    What’s more important, capturing a greater share of the nation’s limited residential property market, potentially shutting out future generations of first-home-buyers, or investing in and growing productive businesses that create good, well-paying jobs?

    And what about the government’s choice to reopen oil and gas drilling instead of seizing the opportunity to lower people’s energy bills and create jobs by investing to upgrade our homes and businesses to run on clean energy.

    Or their choice to cancel free prescriptions; to make it more expensive to catch the bus or train; to cut jobs.

    Every government should be judged on the choices it makes – and in nearly every case, this government has chosen to make life harder for people.

    *****

    Eighteen months ago, I wasn’t expecting National to keep in place every one of the changes Labour had made.

    But I think like most people, I did expect them to show some interest in doing what’s right for the country.

    To acknowledge what was working and to continue to invest in the places where it would make the biggest difference.

    While election campaigns highlight the things we disagree on, New Zealand’s recent history has seen new incoming governments build on the work of their predecessors, not try to turn the clock backwards.

    Until this one.

    Most New Zealanders understand that coalition government requires careful thought, compromise, and listening to those with whom you don’t always agree.

    But they also expect, as I do too, that their government will reflect what people actually voted for.  

    By allowing ACT and New Zealand First to call the shots, Christopher Luxon has turned his back on the promises he made.

    He is devoid of ideas; unfocussed; and too weak to confront the challenges we face today and set us up for tomorrow.

    He has put style over substance.

    Messing around on social media ahead over doing the job.

    Talking points over ideas.

    This type of small politics will no longer do. Not when our shared future is at stake.

    ***

    Now, I am not going to stand here and ask you to give your support to the Labour Party just so we can put everything back in place – and start the merry-go-round again.

    And I can assure you we aren’t going to spend our first year back in government pausing, cancelling, and reviewing everything. 

    Just because the current government started something we aren’t just going to stop it because it was their idea not ours. If it’s working, we will keep moving forward.

    No more throwing the baby out with the bathwater just to make a political point.

    Infrastructure projects will not be stopped dead or contracts ripped up as has happened under National

    The current government’s decision pause or cancel new state house builds, school upgrades, hospital re-builds, transport projects and big infrastructure works contributed to a loss of over 13,000 jobs in building and construction right at a time when we need them most.

    We will not repeat that mistake.

    No more games.

    No more broken promises.

    No more gutting the things that help New Zealand grow.

    Instead, I want to ask for your support for a new way of doing things.

    An approach to government built on collaboration.

    Where we work with people, with communities and businesses, experts and unions to achieve a clear set of shared goals. 

    A government that sets a direction and sees its role as creating the space for innovation and creativity.

    Finding new ways of working together to meet the challenges we face.  

    We will lead a government of action. All of us, working together for change.

    People action that changes their lives for the better – and the current Government is not strong or united enough to deliver it.

    Labour has always led Governments of change – introducing Kiwisaver, the SuperFund, Kiwibank and the list goes on.

    Those changes helped New Zealand grow and prosper and our next government will build on that.

    Today, I am signaling that we intend to make changes in government that will put New Zealand on a solid, sustainable and sound footing for the future.

    ****

    When I look across the Tasman at why our young people might be attracted to Australia, I see an economy with high savings rates, large domestic pools of capital, Research and Development incentives and yes, a tax system that encourages investment in local businesses and new jobs, not just houses.

    I see an economy that views growing wages and better working conditions as a sign of success, not a constraint.

    I see a public sector that pays its doctors, nurses, teachers, police and other public servants more because it sees that as an investment, not ‘wasteful spending’.

    You can expect the next Labour Government to move New Zealand in that same economic direction.

    Our next Labour government will be focused on three goals. Each one targeted on the issues that matter most to people.

    And it starts with an economy that works for everyone.

    We’ll raise living standards and boost incomes across New Zealand, so people have more money to pay the bills, put food on the table, or buy new shoes and warm clothes for the kids.

    We’ll support our innovators and entrepreneurs and remove barriers that make residential property investment more profitable than investing in Kiwi businesses.

    We’ll embrace new technology and the opportunities of clean, renewable energy.

    Lower power bills due to a rapid uptake of renewable energy, including exciting new opportunities in solar and geothermal, which can help Kiwi businesses lower their costs and get ahead of their international competitors.

    New Zealand has a proven track record in innovation. Think foiling yachts, jet boats, electric fences, rockets, clever animation, humidified respiration and electromagnets. Science, innovation and creativity must help drive our economy forward and help create jobs, boost incomes, and lower costs for people.

    We need to build an economy that ends the reliance on trickle-down and instead grows from the local community out.

    Where an idea that starts around a kitchen table or in a garage can be turned into a new business.

    Where prosperity is built from the contribution of every person, every community, every region.

    I’m not interested in an economy where one part of the country races ahead of the rest. Nor will I accept growth that depends on jobs that are low paid and insecure.

    I want the benefits of a prosperous, thriving economy to be felt on every farm, at every kitchen table, at every rugby club, at every family BBQ.

    Meaningful, secure jobs in every part of the country that pay enough to cover life’s essentials, like good food and a warm home.

    ***

    And when I say a warm home, I also mean one that is affordable to live in.

    Which leads me to the second of our national goals: for everyone to have a safe, healthy, and affordable place to call home.

    Labour will get New Zealand building again. More warm, dry, and affordable homes in the places people want to live.

    We will work with local councils and communities, taking a long-term view of our housing requirements, so we can invest in land now and start building services families need, like schools, drinking water, and reliable roads and buses.

    Opportunities for first time buyers in every community.

    And for the one and a half million people who rent, we will support you to make your rented property a home, a place that is warm and safe, where you can put down roots and be part of the local community.   

    Because a home is the very foundation of our health and wellbeing.

    But when it matters, I also want people to be able to access the quality healthcare they need.

    Which is why the third goal is a quality public health care system where everyone has access to the care they need, when they need it.

    Where prevention comes first and where care is closer to home.

    We’ll end the postcode lottery so the quality of care you or your loved ones receive doesn’t depend on where you live. 

    And make it easier and quicker for people to see a doctor.

    I want people to know that no matter what happens, they and their loved ones will be well looked after.

    So, we will also make it a priority to ensure our nurses and healthcare workers are properly valued and paid what they deserve.

    And support kaupapa Māori and Pasifika approaches to care so everyone is cared for equally.

    ***

    This is our plan:

    A fair economy with secure jobs that pay a decent wage, health care you can rely on, and a warm home you can afford and make your own with a great school down the road.

    In short: jobs, health and homes.

    We know that the government can’t do this alone. We’re going to need to work in partnership with people and businesses in communities up and down New Zealand.

    Government setting the direction – but with every step of the journey taken together.

    So, today, as well as setting out what a Labour-led government means for New Zealand, I am announcing the team who will take this work forward.

    Labour will have a refreshed economic team led by Barbara Edmonds.

    Barbara is well known to you all – she will keep doing her great work with an expanded Finance and Economy portfolio and the new Savings and Investment portfolio.

    I’ve tasked Barbara with making sure we’re ready to balance the books, increase our savings, expand the opportunities we have to invest in ourselves, and create the economic conditions for all Kiwis to thrive.

    As part of our work to build an economy that works for everyone, we will make good quality, meaningful, well-paid jobs getting Kiwis back to work a key focus, with Ginny Andersen taking on the new Jobs and Incomes portfolio.

    Reuben Davidson joins the economic team, with Science, Innovation and Technology, alongside Broadcasting, Media and the Creative Economy.

    Peeni Henare picks up Economic Development and Cushla Tangaere-Manual a new focus on the Māori Economy.

    These MPs will work together, along with our team of energy, infrastructure, manufacturing and industry spokespeople on an economic plan that will put New Zealand on a solid, sustainable and sound footing for the future.

    Simply inviting cash from offshore is not an economic strategy. Our own people need the tools to innovate, create and thrive and it will be a Labour Government that makes that happen.

    An economy that delivers for all New Zealanders needs public investment. We’ve run down our infrastructure and sold off many of the public assets built up and passed down to us by previous generations.

    I want our next government to be one of rebuilding.

    Kieran McAnulty picks up the new portfolio of Public Investment and Infrastructure, alongside his existing work in Housing. Tangi Utikere will work alongside him in Transport and Local Government.

    Ayesha Verrall keeps health. Willow Jean Prime moves into Education, and Willie Jackson Social Development.

    I know that Auckland’s success will be New Zealand’s success. That’s why I’ve asked my deputy, Carmel Sepuloni, to take on the Auckland Issues portfolio and make it her major focus.

    ***

    In the coming weeks and months, this new Labour Party team will be supporting me to deliver the goals I have set out today.

    Meeting with communities, talking to experts, listening to businesses, and gathering ideas from Kiwis.

    You can expect policy announcements from us this year, not in the weeks before election day.

    Our policy packages will work with the three priorities I’ve announced today: jobs, health and homes.

    We want to work with you as we finalise that policy, not just tell you how it’s going to be.

    We do this because I know we all have the shared goal of building a better New Zealand, together. 

    A future where our kids see a good life for themselves in the places where they grew up, with great schools down the road, and surgeries and hospitals nearby where the doctor and nurses looking after you aren’t burnt out.

    A future where nobody’s opportunities in life are limited by who they are, or where they are from.

    A future where businesses – large and small – are supported to thrive and grow, creating well-paid jobs that cover the essentials and leave enough for people to enjoy the little things.

    Where the decisions we make about how to confront climate change make life better for people, lower their bills, and create new opportunities for well-paid work in communities everywhere.

    This is the future that is within reach.

    Whether or not we make it happen, will depend entirely on the choices we make together.

    So, let’s get to work.


    Media: Check against delivery.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: Panasonic in Numbers: Solar Lantern Donation in Kenya

    Source: Panasonic

    Headline: Panasonic in Numbers: Solar Lantern Donation in Kenya

    Panasonic Holdings, in cooperation with the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), has donated 100 Panasonic solar lanterns to women and girls living without electricity in Orinie Village in Kajiado County, Kenya. The donation was conducted through Kenya’s National Gender and Equality Commission (NGEC).The initiative aims to help eliminate gender-based violence (GBV), which causes up to 3.7% loss of a country’s GDP*, by encouraging women’s economic independence and helping build knowledge and confidence through electrification.“The solar lanterns offer great hope to women and girls… The lanterns mean that they can also study at home, and are able to perform work at night at home to improve their income,” commented a female leader in Orinie Village**.
    * https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/socialsustainability/brief/violence-against-women-and-girls** https://news.panasonic.com/global/topics/16518

    MIL OSI Economics –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Tuberville, Moran Introduce Bill to Expand Capital for Rural Communities

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Tommy Tuberville (Alabama)
    WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Tommy Tuberville (R-AL) joined U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-KS) in reintroducing the Access to Credit for our Rural Economy (ACRE) Act. This legislation would benefit American families, farmers, and rural communities nationwide by providing greater flexibility to more financial institutions to offer affordable lines of credit to rural and agricultural borrowers. 
    Senator Tuberville cosponsored this legislation in the 118th Congress.
    “As Alabama’s voice on the Senate Ag Committee, I will always advocate for Alabama’s farmers and rural communities here in Washington,” said Senator Tuberville. “Our farmers are struggling with cash flow and desperately need expanded access to credit to continue their farm operations. I’m proud to join my colleagues in cosponsoring this bill that would bolster our agricultural economy and stimulate rural housing for all Alabamians.”
    “Persistent inflation and high interest rates are putting a strain on farmers and rural homeowners in Kansas and across the country,” said Senator Moran. “Rural Americans should have the flexibility to access the capital needed to expand their family farms and achieve the dream of homeownership. This legislation will help to boost rural housing and support the agricultural economy that plays a vital role in small towns across America.”
    Senators Tuberville and Moran were joined by Senators Kevin Cramer (R-ND), Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), Angus King (I-ME), and Roger Marshall (R-KS) in cosponsoring the legislation.
    American Bankers Association and Independent Community Bankers of America endorsed the legislation.
    Read full text of the legislation here. 
    BACKGROUND:
    The ACRE Act would:
    Amend the Internal Revenue Code to exclude interest received on certain loans secured by rural or agricultural real property from gross income
    Allow farm real estate borrowers and rural homeowners access to lower interest rates by expanding the same tax-exempt status on certain earned interest that applies to other lenders
    Apply to agricultural real estate and single-family home mortgage loans in rural communities with fewer than 2,500 residents and for mortgages less than $750,000
    Expand access to affordable agricultural and home loans to over 4,000 rural communities nationwide and save family farmers and producers well over $400 million in annual interest expenses
    Senator Tommy Tuberville represents Alabama in the United States Senate and is a member of the Senate Armed Services, Agriculture, Veterans’ Affairs, HELP, and Aging Committees.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Shaheen Introduces Bipartisan, Bicameral Proposal to Make Child Care More Affordable

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen
    (Washington, DC) – U.S. Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) introduced the Child Care Availability and Affordability Act and the Child Care Workforce Act—bipartisan, bicameral legislation that together form a bold proposal to make child care more affordable and accessible by strengthening existing tax credits to lower child care costs and increase the supply of child care providers. The bill was co-led by U.S. Senators Katie Britt (R-AL), Tim Kaine (D-VA) and Joni Ernst (R-IA). U.S. Representatives Mike Lawler (NY-17) and Salud Carbajal (CA-24) introduced a companion bill in the U.S. House of Representatives. The bill includes language from Shaheen’s Right Start Child Care and Education Act legislation.
    “I hear time and again from parents in New Hampshire who are desperate for reliable, affordable child care options, but for too many families, their options are limited at best and nonexistent at worst,” said Senator Shaheen. “For an issue that impacts so many families in every corner of every state, it’s time we find a bipartisan path forward, which is why I’m proud to join my colleagues on this commonsense, bipartisan proposal to lower child care costs, increase wages for the workforce and ensure providers can keep their doors open.”
    Additional cosponsors of the Child Care Availability and Affordability Act include U.S. Senators John Curtis (R-UT), Angus King (I-ME), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WV), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Susan Collins (R-ME). The bill text can be viewed here.
    The Child Care Workforce Act is also cosponsored by U.S. Senators King and Gillibrand. The proposal contains two bills because one proposes changes to existing tax credits, falling under the jurisdiction of the Senate Finance Committee, and the other authorizes a new pilot program, falling under the jurisdiction of the Senate HELP Committee. The bill text can be viewed here.
    The worsening child care crisis is holding families, child care workers, businesses and our entire economy back. Across the country, too many families cannot find—or afford—the high-quality child care they need so parents can go to work and children can thrive. Over the last few decades, the cost of child care has increased by 263%, forcing families—and mothers, in particular—to make impossible choices.
    More than half of all families live in child care deserts. Meanwhile, child care workers are struggling to make ends meet on their poverty-level wages and child care providers are struggling to simply stay afloat. The crisis—which was exacerbated by the pandemic—is costing our economy approximately $122 billion in economic losses each year.
    New national polling in conjunction with First Five Years Fund (FFYF) reflects overwhelming bipartisan support for the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit (CDCTC), with 86% of voters in support of increasing the CDCTC. Additionally, 79% of Republican voters say they want President Trump and Republicans in Congress to do more to help hardworking families afford child care with 72% saying investing in child care is a good use of tax dollars. According to polling from Fabrizio Ward, 63% of all voters say helping working class families is their top priority when it comes to changes in tax policy.
    Senator Shaheen has been a leader in advocating for more affordable and accessible child care, including by delivering more than $77 million to New Hampshire through the American Rescue Plan and other COVID relief laws to the Granite State. Since then, Shaheen had urged state and local officials to distribute those federal funds, especially in communities that lack access to child care. In August, Shaheen visited Colebrook Community Child Care Center to discuss challenges and solutions to the child care crisis in rural communities, and in October Shaheen hosted Acting Secretary of Labor Julie Su for a discussion on child care and workforce challenges in Brentwood. 
    Last year, Shaheen introduced the Right Start Child Care and Education Act, which would make child care more affordable and accessible for working families by reforming the federal tax code. She also introduced the bipartisan Expanding Child Care for Military Families Act. Additionally, she helped introduce the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit Enhancement Act to permanently expand the Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit, which helps households offset their child care costs.
    Last April, Shaheen convened a hearing as former Chair of the U.S. Senate Small Business and Entrepreneurship Committee to hear testimony from expert witnesses on the child care industry’s broken business model and what Congress can do to support small business child care providers, employees and families. A subsequent U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Office of Advocacy issue brief, in response to data challenges raised at the hearing, details the role of small businesses in the child care industry and fills data gaps in child care industry research.
    Last Congress, Shaheen helped introduce the Child Care Stabilization Act, which would provide additional federal child care stabilization funding—which was provided in the American Rescue Plan—and ensure that child care providers can keep their doors open and continue serving children and families in every part of the country. Shaheen joined Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) to introduce the Child Care for Working Families Act, which would provide affordable child care for all working families, expand access to preschool programs and increase wages for early childhood workers. She also joined U.S. Senators Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and Dan Sullivan (R-AK) in reintroducing the bipartisan Childcare Workforce and Facilities Act to address the national shortage of affordable, quality child care, especially in rural communities. In the government funding bill for fiscal year (FY) 2024, Senator Shaheen worked to include a $1 billion increase for early education, including a $725 million increase to $8.75 billion for Child Care and Development Block Grants to states and a $275 million increase to Head Start4. The law additionally included $315 million for Preschool Development Grants.
    The Child Care Availability and Affordability Act is endorsed by A+ Education Partnership, Alabama Arise, Alabama School Readiness Alliance, American Federation of Teachers (AFT), Bipartisan Policy Center Action (BPCA), Business Council of Alabama, Care.com, Chamber of Progress, Chamber RVA, Child Care Aware of America (CCAoA), Child Care Aware of Virginia, Children’s Institute, Early Care & Education Consortium (ECEC), Educare Learning Network, FFYF, Gingerbread Kids Academy, Hampton Roads Chamber, Healthy Kids AL, KinderCare Learning Companies, Manufacture Alabama, Metrix IQ, Mobile Area Education Foundation, National Association of Women Business Owners (NAWBO), National Child Care Association (NCCA), Northern Virginia Chamber of Commerce (NVC), Save the Children, Small Business Majority, Start Early, Third Way, U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Virginia Chamber of Commerce, Virginia Early Childhood Foundation (VECF), VOICES for Alabama’s Children and Voices for Virginia’s Kids. In addition to those groups, the Child Care Workforce Act is endorsed by the National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC), National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) and ZERO TO THREE.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Murray, Ossoff, Colleagues Demand Trump Administration Ensure Legal Representation for Vulnerable Children in Immigration System

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Washington State Patty Murray
    Washington, D.C. — Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, joined U.S. Senator Jon Ossoff (D-GA) and 33 other senators in a letter demanding the Trump Administration ensures legal representation for children caught up in the immigration system. In their letter to Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum, the senators urged the administration to continue legal services for unaccompanied children caught up in the immigration system as required by law. Earlier this month, the Trump Administration issued a stop work order to organizations that provide legal services for unaccompanied children. Last week, following public pressure, the order was rescinded.
    “Pausing or terminating the provision of legal services to unaccompanied children under this contract runs directly counter to the requirements of the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act (TVPRA) and places 26,000 unaccompanied children at increased risk of trafficking, exploitation, and other harm,” the senators wrote to Secretaries Kennedy and Burgum. “The TVPRA, passed by Congress in 2008 on a bipartisan basis, requires the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to ensure, to the greatest extent practicable, that all unaccompanied children have counsel to represent them in legal proceedings and protect them from mistreatment, exploitation, and trafficking.”
    According to a report by the Guardian this month, the organizations affected by the previous stop work order provide legal counsel for around 26,000 unaccompanied minors.
    “Cutting off access to legal services makes it more likely that the government will lose track of unaccompanied children, given the challenges such children would face in independently appearing for immigration court hearings, submitting address updates, or otherwise communicating with immigration authorities,” the group of senators continued. “Not only will this make children more vulnerable to trafficking, but it will also create further inefficiencies in an already backlogged immigration court system.”
    Joining Sens. Murray and Ossoff in sending the letter were Senators Mazie Hirono (D-HI), Ron Wyden (D-OR), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI), Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Michael Bennet (D-CO), Chris Coons (D-DE), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Martin Heinrich (D-NM), Angus King (I-ME), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Ed Markey (D-MA), Cory Booker (D-NJ), Gary Peters (D-MI), Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), John Hickenlooper (D-CO), Alex Padilla (D-CA), Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-GA), Peter Welch (D-VT), Adam Schiff (D-CA), Andy Kim (D-NJ), and Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE).
    The full text of the letter is available HERE.
    Senator Murray has championed comprehensive and humane immigration reform throughout her Senate career, repeatedly pushing for legislative solutions that would offer a fair pathway to citizenship for the more than 11 million undocumented immigrants living in America, including Dreamers, farmworkers, and those with Temporary Protected Status. During Trump’s first administration, Senator Murray helped lead the charge in pushing back against Trump’s appalling treatment of migrant children and families at the southern border— cosponsoring the Fair Day in Court for Kids Act, which would require unaccompanied children and vulnerable individuals to be provided with legal assistance during immigration court proceedings, the Stop Cruelty to Migrant Children Act to end family separations at the border, and legislation to prevent the separation of families at sensitive locations such as schools, religious institutions, and hospitals, among many other efforts.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Takapuna Golf course

    Source: Auckland Council

    As part of ongoing efforts to protect the Auckland region from future floods, Auckland Council will be seeking community feedback on a proposed flood resilient blue-green network in the Wairau Valley.

    Before and after of Greenslade.

    The proposed network is part of Auckland Council’s Making Space for Water programme and co-funded by central government. It follows three other flood resilience initiatives already approved in areas severely impacted by the 2023 Auckland Anniversary Weekend floods, two in Māngere and the other in Rānui.

    The Wairau catchment was one of the hardest-hit areas during the 2023 floods, with severe damage and the tragic loss of life. Auckland Council has explored a range of interventions to reduce flood risks in the area to provide both immediate and long-term flood reduction benefits. One of the proposed options is the redevelopment of AF Thomas Park, currently the site of Takapuna Golf Course, into a multi-use recreational flood storage wetland.

    North Shore Ward Councillor Richard Hills acknowledges repurposing AF Thomas Park will be a tough ask for those who love the golf course as it is, but says the wider community is demanding action to prevent further flooding and potential loss of life and property.

    “The January 2023 floods had a devastating impact on our community, negatively affecting thousands of homes and businesses in the Wairau catchment and causing millions of dollars of damage to community facilities like Eventfinda Stadium and North Shore Badminton,” Councillor Hills says.

    “This weather event made our streets so unsafe we lost lives, and we could have lost many more had volunteers not rescued 69 people from the Wairau Valley. After much investigation, the Healthy Waters team is confident this first phase of the project will provide over 550 million litres of water storage in a flood event, a significant increase from the park’s current 60 million litre capacity,” he says.

    “I recognise the potential changes to AF Thomas Park is upsetting to some of our golfing community and those who use this stunning course. As part of the design process, the council and local boards will work with the community to understand what opportunities may be available to meet the wider golfing and recreation needs of the north shore, alongside providing much needed flood protection and safety for this community.”

    Balancing flood protection and community needs

    Under the proposal, the park would function as a blue-green space, offering the community enhanced recreational facilities and walking paths while also serving as a wetland, designed to temporarily store floodwaters during extreme weather events. Similar approaches have been successfully implemented at Greenslade Reserve in Northcote, where flood storage is integrated with public recreational spaces.

    The project would be the first of a number of connected stages to help safeguard thousands of residents while also creating an improved recreational space for future generations.

    It would significantly reduce flood risks protecting:

    • 10 hectares of residential properties
    • key roads including Nile, Waterloo and Alma Roads
    • critical infrastructure like power substations and wastewater systems
    • important community facilities, including schools and North Shore Hospital.

    Tom Mansell, Auckland Council’s Head of Sustainable Partnerships (Healthy Waters and Flood Resilience) says this is an important opportunity to work alongside the Wairau community to design a project that enhances both flood resilience and recreational spaces.

    “Changes to the golf course will impact current users, but our priority must be to reduce flood risks to homes, schools, and businesses, protect vital infrastructure, and create a space that serves the entire community in multiple ways.

    “The current lease on the golf course expired in February and it’s timely for us to revisit the use of the area with a view to the needs of the whole community,” adds Mr Mansell.

    Why AF Thomas Park?

    Currently, AF Thomas Park provides approximately 60,000m³ of flood storage, enough to fill 24 Olympic-sized swimming pools.

    However, to significantly reduce flood risks across the Wairau Valley, this capacity needs to increase to approximately 550,000m³ – equivalent to 550 million litres of water or 220 Olympic-sized swimming pools.

    Without this intervention, large parts of the Wairau catchment, including residential areas and key transport routes, will remain highly vulnerable to flooding.

    Alternative options, such as widening the stream above or below AF Thomas Park were explored but found to be extremely costly, requiring land purchases exceeding $300 million and currently no budget has been allocated for such land purchases.

    Increasing existing water detention facilities in 11 other open spaces were also considered but would only provide a fraction of the necessary flood storage.

    Mr Mansell explains why the site cannot remain as it is:

    “The land in the northeast corner of the park, proposed for the primary flood storage area, needs to be lowered to effectively hold stormwater. This will result in a permanently wet environment due to groundwater seepage.

    “It’s an opportunity to restore and enhance the wetland that historically existed here, providing ecological and recreational benefits beyond flood resilience,” he adds.

    Community engagement and next steps

    Auckland Council is now actively engaging with the broader community and stakeholders in a consultation process. If the business case is approved, there will be multiple opportunities for public input to shape the final design of the park.

    “By working together with local and central government, businesses, and residents, we can develop a solution that is effective, sustainable, and beneficial for the whole community,” says Tom Mansell. 

    “We also recognise the importance of golf to golfers in the North Shore community. As part of this process, the local community, golf community and other groups with interest in the project, will be engaged to assess current and future recreational needs. This will help determine how the space can best serve the wider community while supporting a transition plan for golf club members to alternative facilities.

    “We need to take a catchment-wide approach to flood resilience.

    “The challenges we face in the Wairau Valley are complex, with both natural and human-made barriers affecting water flow.

    “Prior to human settlement water flowed south into Ngataringa Bay, before the land around Lake Pupuke was raised by a significant rocky uplift which caused a layer of basalt rock to form a natural barrier. This changed the water course and forced it to change direction and flow through Wairau Creek to Milford Beach,” explains Mr Mansell.

    Next steps

    After the initial community engagement this month, the business case will be taken to the Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee for endorsement in April.

    If approved, the project will be delivered in stages, with community input shaping its design. Construction is not expected to begin before 2027, allowing ample time for engagement and planning.

    For more information, visit the council’s website or contact the Making Space for Water team at bluegreen@aucklandcouncil.govt.nz

    History:

    •   1912: H.G. Stringer leased Takapuna Reserve to develop an 18-hole golf course for Takapuna Golf Club
      • 1931: North Shore Golf Club established at what is now Thomas Park Municipal Course in Takapuna
      •           1959: Auckland Harbour Bridge motorway developments led to golf-course land reduction
      •           1961: Crown became the equitable owner of the North Shore Golf Club land
      •           1963: North Shore Golf Club relocated to Albany; Takapuna City Council accepted tenancy of the land
      •           1964: Public meeting endorsed Council purchasing the land for public recreation
      •           1965: Takapuna City Council acquired most of the land; Landcorp obtained a 30-year license
      •           1971: Council policy changed to include municipal golf links due to public demand
      •           1975: Land officially named A.F. Thomas Park
      •           1986: Takapuna City Council granted Ultra Golf Enterprises a 33-year lease to manage the Municipal Golf Course, ensuring public access.

    Present: Auckland Council owns AF Thomas Park, which is leased to the Takapuna Golf Club. The existing 33-year golf club lease expired in February and has moved to a month-by-month lease while consultation and design development is undertaken to ascertain the future uses of the park.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Portland Couple Sentenced to Federal Prison for Stealing $34 Million from Former Client

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    A husband and wife from Portland, who together owned and operated a local chauffeur and limousine business, were sentenced to federal prison Wednesday for stealing $34 million dollars from two former clients.

    Sergey Lebedenko, 54, and Galina Lebedenko, 49, were both sentenced to 57 months in federal prison and three years’ supervised release. The sum of restitution they must pay to the victim will be determined at a later date.

    According to court documents, the Lebedenkos owned and operated a Portland area chauffeur and limousine businesses that eventually became Astra Car Service, LLC. Sergey did the driving, and Galina handled the company’s books and finances.

    The Lebedenkos met their victim in 2007 when Sergey was hired to drive the individual to the airport. The individual soon became a regular customer of the Lebedenkos. By 2018, Sergey was driving the individual almost daily in and around Portland, and Galina was performing other personal tasks for the victim and the victim’s partner including paying their bills, sorting their mail, and providing pet care. This expansive personal services arrangement between the Lebedenkos and their victim continued from approximately 2018 until 2023.

    Despite the volume and frequency of paid services the Lebedenkos provided, they never had a written business agreement or contract. In 2013, Galina produced an invoice showing hourly rates of $90 for driving and $60 for other services. In about 2016, after nearly a decade of working together, the victim gave the Lebedenkos his American Express credit card information so they could directly charge the card for their services.

    Other than the single invoice issued in 2013, the Lebedenkos never provided their victim with logs of their hours or information about how much they were charging for their services. For much of their work, only the Lebedenkos knew the amount of time they spent providing services. On rare occasions, Sergey was questioned by the victim about certain minimal charges and Sergey would repeatedly play up their longstanding, trusting relationship.

    The Lebedenkos stole approximately $34 million over seven years. On a single day in 2023, the Lebedenkos charged their victim’s credit card 17 times for a total of $17,900 for picking up and delivering a prescription and meals.

    The Lebedenkos used their ill-gotten gains to fund an extraordinarily extravagant lifestyle for themselves and others, purchasing 14 homes and properties, 7 vehicles, an ownership interest in a private jet, and countless luxury items including shoes, watches, wallets, jewelry, and gold bars. As part of their sentences, the court entered a Final Order of Forfeiture against assets the Lebedenkos purchased with proceeds of their fraud, including 14 real properties and 19 financial accounts, which are pending forfeiture and sale. The government intends to seek remission of forfeited assets to the victim.

    On January 22, 2024, the Lebedenkos were together charged by federal criminal complaint with committing wire fraud and money laundering. Later, on February 21, 2024, a federal grand jury in Portland returned an indictment charging the couple with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering, and 34 individual counts of wire fraud.

    On October 25, 2024, the Lebedenkos both pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and wire fraud.

    This case was investigated by the FBI and IRS Criminal Investigation. It was prosecuted by Meredith D.M. Bateman and Andrew T. Ho, Assistant U.S. Attorneys for the District of Oregon. Forfeiture proceedings are being handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Katie C. de Villiers, also of the District of Oregon.

    MIL Security OSI –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: The Keg Royalties Income Fund Announces Fourth Quarter 2024 and Full Year 2024 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Not for distribution to U.S. News wire services or dissemination in the U.S.

    VANCOUVER, British Columbia, March 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Keg Royalties Income Fund (the “Fund”) (TSX: KEG.UN) is pleased to announce its financial results for the three months ended December 31, 2024 (the “quarter”) and the twelve months ended December 31, 2024 (“YTD”).

    HIGHLIGHTS

    • Royalty Pool Sales(1) down 7.1% to $188.2M for the quarter and down 3.0% to $719.5M YTD
    • Keg Restaurants Ltd. (“KRL”) Average Sales per Operating Week(1) up 0.4% to $140,000 for the quarter and down 0.8% to $132,000 YTD
    • KRL Same Store Sales(1) up 2.6% for the quarter and down 0.7% YTD
    • Distributable Cash(1) up 9.9% to $0.262/Fund unit for the quarter and up 7.7% to $1.248/Fund unit YTD
    • Special cash distribution of $0.04/Fund unit declared on December 23, 2024, and was and paid on January 31, 2025
    • Payout Ratio(2) was 123.8% for the quarter and 94.2% YTD        

    Royalty Pool Sales reported by the 105 Keg restaurants in the Royalty Pool were $188,167,000 for the fourth quarter of 2024, a decrease of $14,350,000 or 7.1% from the comparable quarter of the prior year. The decrease in Royalty Pool Sales during the fourth quarter of 2024 was primarily due to the extra week of sales reported by KRL in the fourth quarter of 2023. Year-to-date, Royalty Pool Sales decreased by $22,157,000, or 3.0% to $719,541,000 due to the combination of the extra week of sales reported by KRL in the year ended December 31, 2023, and the slight decrease in Same Store Sales of 0.7% for the comparable 52-week periods.

    Royalty income decreased by $574,000 or 7.1% from $8,101,000 in the three months ended December 31, 2023 to $7,527,000 in the three months ended December 31, 2024. For the twelve months of 2024, royalty income decreased by $886,000 or 3.0% from $29,668,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2023 to $28,782,000 for the twelve months ended December 31, 2024.

    Distributable Cash available to pay distributions to public unitholders increased by $268,000 from $2,703,000 ($0.238/Fund unit) to $2,971,000 ($0.262/Fund unit) for the quarter, and increased by $1,016,000 from $13,154,000 ($1.159/Fund unit) to $14,170,000 ($1.248/Fund unit) year-to-date. During the fourth quarter of 2024, distributions of $3,677,000 ($0.324/Fund unit) were declared to Fund unitholders, compared to $4,130,000 ($0.364/Fund unit) in the fourth quarter of 2023. During 2024, distributions of $13,343,000 ($1.175/Fund unit) were declared to Fund unitholders, compared to $13,797,000 ($1.215/Fund unit) during the 2023 fiscal year. The decrease of $0.04/Fund unit in distributions declared to Fund unitholders for both the three and twelve month comparable periods, is entirely due to the difference between the $0.08/Fund unit special distribution declared in December of 2023, compared to the $0.04/Fund unit special distribution declared in December of 2024, as a result of KRL’s 53rd week of operation in 2023.

    In any reporting period, the Fund’s Distributable Cash is affected, both positively and negatively, by any changes in non-cash Working Capital Before Classification of Class C and Exchangeable Partnership Units as Current Liabilities balances recognized in that reporting period. The increase in the Fund’s Distributable Cash in the fourth quarter of 2024, was primarily attributable to the positive effects of changes in non-cash operating Working Capital Before Classification of Class C and Exchangeable Partnership Units as Current Liabilities balances during the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase in the Fund’s Distributable Cash in the twelve months of 2024, was primarily attributable to the positive effects of changes in non-cash operating Working Capital Before Classification of Class C and Exchangeable Partnership Units as Current Liabilities balances during the twelve months of 2024, as the incremental operating cash flow associated with KRL’s 53rd week of operation in the 2023 fiscal year was not received by the Fund until January 2024. The Fund’s year ended December 31, 2024 included this extra week of operating cash flow, thereby increasing Distributable Cash and decreasing the year-to-date Payout Ratio.

    The Payout Ratio was 123.8% for the fourth quarter of 2024 and 94.2% for the year.

    The Fund remains financially well positioned with cash on hand of $2,065,000 and a positive Working Capital Before Classification of Class C and Exchangeable Partnership Units as Current Liabilities balance of $2,627,000 as at December 31, 2024.

    (1) This is a non-IFRS supplementary financial measure. Please refer to the “Non-GAAP and other financial measures disclosure (NI 52-112)” section of this press release.
    (2) This is a non-IFRS ratio. Please refer to the “Non-GAAP and other financial measures disclosure (NI 52-112)” section of this press release.

    “We are very pleased with the financial results of the Fund in the fourth quarter of 2024, despite the continued challenges facing the full-service restaurant category” said Kip Woodward, Chairman of the Fund. “Management continues their solid focus on operating efficiencies and delivering the best guest dining experience during these times of softening economic conditions. We are heartened by our long-term guest loyalty which we always endeavor to earn.”

    “We are pleased with KRL’s sales performance during the fourth quarter of 2024. Same store sales increased 2.6% versus the comparable quarter of 2023. Our guests continue to trust that they will receive a great experience each time they visit one of our locations” said Nick Dean, President of KRL. “Throughout 2024, management focused on empowering our exceptionally talented team of Keggers to deliver our promise of superior hospitality and product quality for our guests. With this strategy firmly in place, we expect guest demand for The Keg will continue to improve well into 2025”, he concluded.

    NON-GAAP AND OTHER FINANCIAL MEASURES DISCLOSURE (“NI 52-112”)

    NI 52-112 prescribes disclosure requirements that apply to certain Non-IFRS measures known as “specified financial measures”. This press release makes reference to certain non-IFRS measures which provides important information regarding the Fund’s financial performance and ability to pay distributions to unitholders. By considering these non-IFRS measures in combination with IFRS measures, the Fund believes that readers are provided with additional and more useful information about the Fund’s financial performance as opposed to considering IFRS measures alone. The terms “System Sales”, “Royalty Pool”, “Royalty Pool Sales”, “Same Store Sales”, “Distributable Cash Before SIFT Tax”, “Distributable Cash”, “Payout Ratio”, “Operating Weeks”, “Average Sales per Operating Week” and “Working Capital Before Classification of Class C and Exchangeable Partnership Units as Current Liabilities” are non-IFRS measures and non-IFRS ratios. These non-IFRS measures reported by the Fund do not have standardized meanings as prescribed by IFRS, and the Fund’s method of calculating these measures may differ and may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other issuers.

    “System Sales” is a non-IFRS supplementary financial measure representing the gross sales of all corporate restaurants owned by KRL, and the gross sales reported to KRL by franchise restaurants without independent audit, in any period. The total System Sales of KRL are of interest to readers as it best reflects KRL’s overall sales performance.

    “Royalty Pool” is a non-IFRS supplementary financial measure representing a specific pool of Keg restaurants for which System Sales is calculated, obligating KRL to make monthly royalty payments to the Partnership equal to 4% of these gross sales.

    “Royalty Pool Sales” is a non-IFRS supplementary financial measure representing the total gross sales reported by Keg restaurants included in a specified Royalty Pool, for which the Fund receives a royalty of 4% on these reported gross sales in any period.

    “Same Store Sales” is a non-IFRS supplementary financial measure representing the overall increase or decrease in gross sales from a group of Keg restaurants (those restaurants that operated during the entire period of both the current and prior years), compared to gross sales for the same group of restaurants for the same period of the prior year.

    “Distributable Cash Before SIFT Tax” is a non-IFRS supplementary financial measure and is defined as the periodic cash flows from operating activities as reported in the IFRS consolidated financial statements, including the effects of changes in non-cash Working Capital Before Classification of Class C and Exchangeable Partnership Units as Current Liabilities, plus the Specified Investment Flow-through Trust tax (“SIFT” tax) paid (including current year instalments), less interest and financing fees paid on the term loan, less the Partnership distributions attributable to KRL through its ownership of Exchangeable units.

    “Distributable Cash” is a non-IFRS supplementary financial measure and is defined as the amount of cash available for distribution to the Fund’s public unitholders and is calculated as Distributable Cash Before SIFT Tax, less current year SIFT tax expense. Distributable cash is a non-IFRS financial measure that does not have a standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS, and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other issuers. However, the Fund believes that Distributable Cash, both before and after SIFT tax, provides useful information regarding the amount of cash available for distribution to the Fund’s public unitholders.

    “Payout Ratio” is a non-IFRS ratio and is computed as the ratio of aggregate cash distributions paid during the period plus any special distributions declared or paid during the same period (numerator) to the aggregate Distributable Cash of the period (denominator).

    “Operating Weeks” is a non-IFRS supplementary financial measure representing the number of weeks a restaurant is open for in-store dining, without significant capacity restrictions, during a respective period.

    “Average Sales per Operating Week” is a non-IFRS supplementary financial measure and is defined as the sales generated by an average restaurant during those operating weeks when restaurants were fully open for in-store dining, during a respective period. This metric is calculated by dividing total System Sales for any financial period by the total Operating Weeks open during the same financial period.

    “Working Capital Before Classification of Class C and Exchangeable Partnership Units as Current Liabilities” is a non-IFRS supplementary financial measure and is defined as the Fund’s current assets less current liabilities before Class C and Exchangeable Partnership units. The Fund believes this metric provides useful information to readers as Working Capital Before Classification of Class C and Exchangeable Partnership Units as Current Liabilities represents the Fund’s current working capital amounts expected to be settled for cash within the next twelve months.

    FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

        Three months ended   Twelve months ended
          December 31,       December 31,       December 31,       December 31,  
    ($000’s expect per unit amounts)     2024       2023       2024       2023  
                     
    Restaurants in the Royalty Pool     105       107       105       107  
    Royalty Pool Sales   $ 188,167     $ 202,517     $ 719,541     $ 741,698  
    Royalty income (1)   $ 7,527     $ 8,101     $ 28,782     $ 29,668  
    Interest income (2)     1,091       1,106       4,361       4,383  
    Total income   $ 8,618     $ 9,207     $ 33,143     $ 34,051  
    Administrative expenses (3)     (122 )     (106 )     (468 )     (480 )
    Interest and financing expenses (4)     (224 )     (268 )     (1,002 )     (1,028 )
    Operating income   $ 8,272     $ 8,833     $ 31,673     $ 32,543  
    Distributions to KRL (5)     (3,398 )     (3,572 )     (13,134 )     (13,414 )
    Profit before fair value gain (loss) and income taxes   $ 4,874     $ 5,261     $ 18,539     $ 19,129  
    Fair value gain (loss) (6)     1,526       (2,616 )     (5,123 )     11,119  
    Income tax recovery (expense) (7)     (1,337 )     (1,439 )     (4,992 )     (5,091 )
    Profit (loss) and comprehensive income (loss)   $ 5,063     $ 1,206     $ 8,424     $ 25,157  
    Distributable Cash Before SIFT Tax   $ 4,287     $ 4,107     $ 19,137     $ 18,260  
    Distributable Cash   $ 2,971     $ 2,703     $ 14,170     $ 13,154  
    Distributions to Fund unitholders (8)   $ 3,677     $ 4,130     $ 13,343     $ 13,797  
    Payout Ratio     123.8 %     152.8 %     94.2 %     104.9 %
                     
    Per Fund unit information (9)                
    Profit before fair value gain (loss) and income taxes   $ 0.429     $ 0.463     $ 1.633     $ 1.685  
    Profit (loss) and comprehensive income (loss)   $ 0.446     $ 0.106     $ 0.742     $ 2.216  
    Distributable Cash Before SIFT Tax   $ 0.378     $ 0.362     $ 1.686     $ 1.608  
    Distributable Cash   $ 0.262     $ 0.238     $ 1.248     $ 1.159  
    Distributions to Fund unitholders (8)   $ 0.324     $ 0.364     $ 1.175     $ 1.215  
                     
    Notes:
    (1)   The Fund, indirectly through The Keg Rights Limited Partnership (the “Partnership”), earns royalty income equal to 4% of gross sales of Keg restaurants in the Royalty Pool.
    (2)   The Fund directly earns interest income on the $57.0 million loan to KRL (the “Keg Loan”), with interest income accruing at 7.5% per annum, payable monthly.
    (3)   The Fund, indirectly through the Partnership, incurs administrative expenses and interest on the operating line of credit, to the extent utilized.
    (4)   The Fund, indirectly through The Keg Holdings Trust (“KHT”), incurs interest expense on the $14.0 million term loan and amortization of deferred financing charges.
    (5)   Represents the distributions of the Partnership attributable to KRL during the respective periods on the Class A, entitled Class B, and Class D Partnership units (“Exchangeable units”) and Class C Partnership units held by KRL. The Exchangeable units are exchangeable into Fund units on a one-for-one basis. These distributions are presented as interest expense in the financial statements.
    (6)   Fair value gain (loss) is the non-cash decrease or increase in the market value of the Exchangeable units held by KRL during the respective period. Exchangeable units are classified as a financial liability under IFRS. The Fund is required to determine the fair value of that liability at the end of each reporting period and adjust for any increase or decrease, taking into consideration the sale of any Exchangeable units and Additional Entitlements during the same period.
    (7)   Income taxes include the SIFT tax expense, and either a non-cash deferred tax expense or deferred tax recovery. The deferred tax expense or recovery primarily results from differences in income recognition between the Fund’s accounting methods and enacted tax laws. It is also partially due to temporary differences between accounting and tax bases of the Keg Rights owned by the Partnership.
    (8)   Distributions to Fund unitholders include all regular monthly cash distributions paid to Fund unitholders during a period and any special distributions, either declared or paid, to Fund unitholders in the same period.
    (9)   All per unit amounts are calculated based on the weighted average number of Fund units outstanding, which are those units held by public unitholders during the respective period. The weighted average number of Fund units outstanding for the three and twelve months ended December 31, 2024 were 11,353,500 (three and twelve months ended December 31, 2023 – 11,353,500).
         

    The Fund (TSX: KEG.UN) is a limited purpose, open-ended trust established under the laws of the Province of Ontario that, through The Keg Rights Limited Partnership, owns certain trademarks and other related intellectual property used by Keg Restaurants Ltd. (“KRL”). In exchange for use of those trademarks, KRL pays the Fund a royalty of 4% of gross sales of Keg restaurants included in the Royalty Pool.

    With approximately 10,000 employees, over 100 restaurants and annual System Sales exceeding $700 million, Vancouver-based KRL is the leading operator and franchisor of steakhouse restaurants in Canada and has a substantial presence in select regional markets in the United States. KRL continues to operate The Keg restaurant system and expand that system through the addition of both corporate and franchised Keg steakhouses. KRL has been named the number one restaurant company to work for in Canada in the latest edition of Forbes “Canada’s Best Employers 2025” survey.

    This press release may contain certain “forward looking” statements reflecting The Keg Royalties Income Fund’s current expectations in the casual dining segment of the restaurant food industry. Investors are cautioned that all forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those relating to the Keg’s ability to continue to realize historical same store sales growth, changes in market and existing competition, new competitive developments, and potential downturns in economic conditions generally. Additional information on these and other potential factors that could affect the Fund’s financial results are detailed in documents filed from time to time with the provincial securities commissions in Canada.

    This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, which may be made only by means of the prospectus, nor shall there be any sale of the Fund units in any state, province or other jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any state, province or jurisdiction. The Keg Royalties Income Fund units have not been, and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended and may not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an application for exemption from the registration requirement under U.S. securities laws.

    The Trustees of the Fund have approved the contents of this press release.

    The MIL Network –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Duckworth, Democrats Demand Answers from Trump and VA Secretary Collins on Indiscriminate Firing of Veterans and VA Employees, Including Veterans Crisis Line Staff

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Tammy Duckworth

    March 06, 2025

    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – Today, combat Veteran and U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)—a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs (SVAC)—led her fellow Democratic colleagues in demanding answers from President Donald Trump and Veterans Affairs (VA) Secretary Doug Collins on their indiscriminate purge of Veterans and VA employees, including staff who help operate the Veterans Crisis Line (VCL), under the direction of unelected co-president Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency. Veterans make up more than 30 percent of the federal workforce and it is estimated that the Trump Administration has already fired more than 6,000 men and women who have served in uniform. Duckworth and her fellow lawmakers are calling on Trump and Secretary Collins to immediately outline how many Veterans and VA employees have been fired since the start of this Administration and to tell the truth about how the VCL has been impacted by these terminations. For weeks, Duckworth has repeatedly called out Secretary Collins for denying the Trump Administration inflicted any damage on the VCL.

    In their letter, the lawmakers slammed Trump and Secretary Collins for smearing those who help prevent Veteran suicide as supposedly “non-essential” employees: “Claiming that only those who answer the phones at VCL are essential is an insult to the service and commitment to Veterans of the many dedicated employees who ensure that someone is ready to listen and help in a moment of crisis. We are shocked that Secretary Collins, who claimed that one of his top priorities as VA Secretary would be to address Veteran suicide, would participate in such a cynical cover-up for the Trump administration’s error— not only by going along with the lies, but also justifying them.”

    After the VA has refused to be transparent about the layoffs, Duckworth and her colleagues are demanding a list of public answers detailing the specific job categories that were impacted, how many of those fired were Veterans and more. The lawmakers are also asking how many VCL employees were terminated as part of each VA purge last month, the specific jobs they held at VCL, whether they’ve been reinstated at this time and if not, why. The lawmakers are requesting answers these questions by no later than March 12, 2025.

    The lawmakers concluded: “Our Veterans deserve honest and transparent answers. As a reminder, the American public elected President Trump into office to represent their best interests, and the actions of the VA Secretary are a direct reflection of President Trump’s leadership and priorities. Our Veterans’ interests should always come before any selfish agenda, and actions that impact their access to care and benefits should require immense scrutiny prior to implementation. We believe this close review has not been conducted, as evidenced by the VA’s scramble to rehire mission-critical positions such as VCL employees.”

    Along with Duckworth, the letter was co-signed by U.S. Senators Alex Padilla (D-CA), Mark Kelly (D-AZ), Tina Smith (D-MN) and Chris Van Hollen (D-MD).

    A copy of the full letter is available on the Senator’s website and below:

    Dear President Trump and Secretary Collins:

    We write today to call into question President Trump’s series of egregious Executive Orders and other illegal actions in coordination with unelected co-president Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), and with unquestioning execution by Secretary Collins, that have had increasingly detrimental impacts on the Veteran community and continue to create capability gaps that threaten the well-being of Veterans. The indiscriminate purge of Veterans and other federal employees at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) means slower claims processing, longer wait times for Veterans seeking access to their medical care and the end of important research that benefits Veterans and all Americans. We demand that you take accountability for these actions and share with the American people what exactly the plan is for the future of VA.

    Just last week, the VA announced a second wave of mass terminations, totaling 1,400 employees, claiming in the announcement that these are “non-mission critical” positions and exclude the Veterans Crisis Line (VCL) – though we have already learned of at least two cases that prove this claim wrong. We challenge this disregard for the important work of the entire VA ecosystem that provides comprehensive and timely care and benefits to our Veterans, and we have yet to learn about a day-after plan that explains how exactly VA will function with so many sudden and senseless cuts. Claiming that only those who answer the phones at VCL are essential is an insult to the service and commitment to Veterans of the many dedicated employees who ensure that someone is ready to listen and help in a moment of crisis. We are shocked that Secretary Collins, who claimed that one of his top priorities as VA Secretary would be to address Veteran suicide, would participate in such a cynical cover-up for the Trump administration’s error— not only by going along with the lies, but also justifying them.

    Nearly 6,000 Veterans across the federal government have been terminated to date. Among the most patriotic people in our Nation, Veterans make up 30 percent of the federal workforce, which is a true reflection of their exceptional dedication to our country. Yet, their President will not even publicly acknowledge his error of judgment in allowing Elon Musk unfettered access across federal agencies in his quest to dismantle their critical contributions that save lives and deliver essential services. Instead, he quietly rehired certain mission-critical VA positions that never should have been terminated and brushed off the significant impact that this indiscriminate mass firing would have on morale, workflow and ability of the Department to deliver critical services to Veterans in a timely manner.

    We demand that you respond to the following questions no later than March 12, 2025, and that this information be made available to the public, and particularly Veterans, who are owed accountability and transparency from the administration that represents them.

    1. Please provide a list detailing, by job category, how many VA employees were terminated during the February 13, 2025, dismissal of 1,000 VA employees, as well as the February 24, 2025, dismissal of an additional 1,400 VA employees.
      1. How many of these employees are Veterans themselves? Please provide a numeric breakdown by job category and duty station.
      1. How many of these employees are disabled Veterans? Please provide a numeric breakdown by job category and duty station.
      1. How many of these employees were eligible for Veterans’ preference? Please provide a numeric breakdown by job category and duty station.
      1. How many of these employees were on probationary status because they had just been promoted? Please provide a numeric breakdown by job category and duty station.
      1. What is the administration’s plan, if any, to assist these dismissed Veterans with obtaining employment elsewhere? Has the administration considered how these terminations may increase the risk of Veteran homelessness?
      1. How many of these employees were military spouses? Please provide a numeric breakdown by job category and duty station.
    1. How many employees working for the VCL received notice of dismissal on February 13, 2025? Have all dismissed VCL employees been reinstated?
      1. If all dismissed VCL employees have not been reinstated, why not? How many positions remain open, and what are the functions of these positions?
      1. Assuming these dismissals were accidental, what error led to these employees being wrongfully terminated? Has this error been addressed in the evaluation process?
    1. How many employees working for the VCL received notice of dismissal on February 24, 2025? Have all dismissed VCL employees been reinstated?
      1. If all dismissed VCL employees have not been reinstated, why not? How many positions remain open, and what are the functions of these positions?
      1. Assuming these dismissals were accidental, what error led to these employees being wrongfully terminated? Has this error been addressed in the evaluation process?
    1. Do you acknowledge that all employees working for the VCL, including and not limited to phone operators, are critical to its mission to ensure that at-risk Veterans receive the assistance they need?
    1. Can you provide a justification for the numerous public reports that describe terminations of probationary employees despite positive evaluations by their respective management?
    1. What analysis is used, if any, to ensure that disabled Veterans using their Veterans’ Preference are not wrongfully wrapped into the administration’s attack on probationary employees?
    1. Can you please describe, in detail, DOGE’s evaluation process in determining cuts to VA employment? What checks are in place to ensure that these cuts do not continue to harm critical programs that provide care and benefits, including mental health services, to Veterans?
    1. What was the total cost spent by the U.S. government on recruiting and training the VA employees who have since been fired by DOGE?
    1. What is the administration’s plan to swiftly address postponements and cancellations of suicide prevention training sessions, health care appointment cancellations and new clinic opening delays?
      1. Please provide a list of programs and services that have been cancelled or delayed since February 13, 2025.
      1. Please include the number of Veterans or VA employees impacted by these cancelations and delays.
    1. How exactly will the claimed savings as a result of the mass terminations at VA be redirected back toward health care, benefits and services for VA beneficiaries?
      1. Please provide an itemized list of savings in dollar amounts by account, and for each amount, specify whether these are mandatory or appropriated funds.
      1. Please provide your spend plan for savings that you claim to recoup through these terminations. Which accounts do you intend to redirect these funds to, and which new services would these funds provide?
      1. For each of these proposed changes, specify whether you have the legal authority to reprogram these funds in the way intended. 
    1. Regarding the February 22, 2025, emails sent to all federal employees requiring an explanation of tasks completed the week prior, what exactly will be done with this information?
      1. Did all Veterans Crisis Line employees receive this email?
      1. Did all physicians and nurses employed in VA hospitals receive this email?
      1. Who is reading and analyzing responses to this email?
      1. Are responses being used to determine future layoffs or personnel changes?
    1. What analysis – if any – did the U.S. Office of Personnel Management conduct to examine the impact terminations or resignations resulting from this email would have on critical services across government?

    Our Veterans deserve honest and transparent answers. As a reminder, the American public elected President Trump into office to represent their best interests, and the actions of the VA Secretary are a direct reflection of President Trump’s leadership and priorities. Our Veterans’ interests should always come before any selfish agenda, and actions that impact their access to care and benefits should require immense scrutiny prior to implementation. We believe this close review has not been conducted, as evidenced by the VA’s scramble to rehire mission-critical positions such as VCL employees.

    We stand ready and willing to reach across the aisle for the best interests of our Veterans – a sentiment that Secretary Collins will recall from his hearing before the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee. Support to our Veterans has historically been a bipartisan issue, and we do not want this long-standing tradition to fall because of a President and his VA Secretary turning their backs on our Veterans due to the influence of an unelected co-president who yields illegal privilege to invoke Executive authorities. He fools no one with his efforts to line the pockets of the wealthy, and we will not stand by while there is an active attack against our Nation’s Veterans.

    President Trump, Secretary Collins – we urge you to uphold with integrity your commitment to our Nation’s Veterans.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Supervised toothbrushing for children to prevent tooth decay 

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Supervised toothbrushing for children to prevent tooth decay 

    Programme will reach up to 600,000 children in most deprived areas

    • National programme rolled out for 3 to 5-year-olds in early years settings – including nurseries and primary schools – in most deprived areas of England 
    • Government also agrees ground-breaking partnership with Colgate which will see more than 23 million toothbrushes and toothpastes donated to support the programme 
    • Programme is latest step in government’s Plan for Change to give children the best start in life and prevent ill health

    Children in the most deprived areas of England will get access to a programme to help protect them from tooth decay, the government has announced today. 

    The supervised toothbrushing programme will be rolled out in early years settings and primary schools, with funding available from April, helping hundreds of thousands of children aged between 3 and 5 years old to develop positive brushing habits.

    The scheme – a manifesto commitment – will be launched in collaboration with Colgate-Palmolive who are providing free Colgate toothbrushes, toothpaste and educational materials to continue good work at home. 

    This government inherited a children’s oral health crisis. The most common reason children aged 5 to 9 being are admitted to hospital is to have treatment for decayed teeth. Latest data shows one in 4 children aged 5 have experienced tooth decay in England, with higher rates of up to one in 3 in more deprived areas. 

    The scheme will help tackle these levels of poor health by ensuring they get the support they need to learn positive habits and prevent tooth decay – in turn avoiding related illness and poor health later in life.

    To deliver the scheme, the government is investing a total of £11 million in local authorities across England to deploy supervised toothbrushing in schools and nurseries that voluntarily sign up. Local authorities will work to identify early years settings in target areas and encourage them to enrol.

    To support the scheme, the government has also agreed an innovative partnership with Colgate-Palmolive, which has generously committed to donate over 23 million toothbrushes and toothpastes over the next 5 years. It is also providing educational materials and a public facing children’s oral health campaign supporting the NHS, developed with its experience of global oral health education.

    The partnership is grounded in the shared mission and commitment between the government and Colgate-Palmolive to advance the oral health of the nation, by reducing the inequalities in oral health and ensuring access to oral health education for every child across the country.

    Together, the resources will reach up to 600,000 children each year and provide families with the support they need to ensure positive behaviours continue at home and over the school holidays.

    The launch is part of the government’s mission to give every child the best start in life and rebuild our health care system through the Plan for Change. The government is also driving forward action to fundamentally reform the NHS dental sector having recently announced the rollout of an extra 700,000 urgent dental appointments nationwide.

    Health Minister Stephen Kinnock said:  

    It is shocking that a third of 5-year-olds in the most deprived areas have experience of tooth decay – something we know can have a lifelong impact on their health. 

    It’s why we’re delivering supervised toothbrushing to young children and families who are most in need of support as part of our wider plans to revive the oral health of the nation. This includes providing 23 million free toothbrushes and toothpastes through our partnership with Colgate-Palmolive to reach up to 600,000 children each year.

    We’re already rolling out 700,000 extra urgent dental appointments for those who need treatment, but by focusing on prevention we can help children have the best start in life. 

    On top of this, we will reform the dental contract to get dentists providing more NHS work as we fundamentally reform the sector through our Plan for Change so it is there for patients once again.

    Colgate-Palmolive’s Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Noel Wallace said:

    At Colgate-Palmolive, we believe every child deserves the chance to have a healthier smile and brighter future. We’re thrilled that Colgate and our team in the UK have been chosen to partner with the government to help improve children’s oral health across the country – it’s an incredibly important initiative given the current levels of tooth decay in children.

    Our global programme Colgate Bright Smiles, Bright Futures is among the most far-reaching and successful children’s oral health initiatives in the world. With long-standing partnerships with governments, schools and communities, BSBF has reached approximately 1.8 billion children and their families since 1991 across 100 countries with free oral health education and free dental screenings.

    In the UK, we’ve been running Colgate Bright Smiles, Bright Futures since 2014 and are extremely proud to have reached over 18 million children across the nation with oral health education and donations of essential health and hygiene products.

    With the launch of the supervised brushing scheme, this partnership will be able to make a real impact in preventing tooth decay and ensuring brighter futures for generations to come. We want all children, regardless of needs or circumstances, to be fully equipped with the information and tools they need to keep improving their oral health every day.

    The scheme is being rolled out in collaboration with the Department for Education and follows the latest tranche of measures to make government-funded childcare more affordable and accessible to the most disadvantaged families.  

    Early years providers such as primary schools and nurseries are required to promote good oral health among attending children, and supervised toothbrushing is a way of achieving that aim. 

    From April, new rules will protect working families from facing high additional charges on top of their entitled childcare hours and providers will begin to benefit from a 45% uplift in early years pupil premium funding, to make sure the most disadvantaged children can access the early years education they need. 

    Early Education Minister Stephen Morgan said:  

    Through our Plan for Change , this government is working hard to break the unfair link between background and opportunity, to ensure tens of thousands more children are school ready every year. 

    We have already started urgent work to increase the affordability and accessibility of high-quality early years and extend early learning support, but we know school-readiness goes beyond what is taught in a classroom. 

    By supporting the youngest children with vital life and development skills, more teachers will be able to focus on what they do best – teach.

    Jason Wong, Chief Dental Officer for England, said: 

    Tooth brushing twice daily with a fluoride toothpaste remains one of the best defences against tooth decay and a long list of preventable oral health issues. This is why we’re thrilled that the government is working with the NHS to expand access to pivotal supervised toothbrushing programmes in schools.

    Having strong healthy teeth can have a hugely positive impact on a child’s life. If you’re concerned about your child’s oral health, you can find helpful guidance on the NHS website or through your local authority – and  as a reminder to parents, all children have free dental care available through the NHS.

    Supervised toothbrushing is a proven, evidence-based health intervention, and is expected to deliver measurable improvements to children’s oral health and reductions in oral health inequalities from between 2 and 3 years after launch. 

    The rollout is expected to save the NHS millions of pounds that would otherwise be spent on treating dental disease in children, including preventing hospital admissions that cost the NHS around £1,600 per person.

    Every £1 spent on supervised toothbrushing is expected to save £3 in avoided treatment costs – amounting to over £34million over the next 5 years that can instead be spent on treating other patients. 

    Data published last week showed more than 49,000 young people under-19 were admitted to hospital for tooth extraction between in the financial year ending 2024. 

    Alongside the launch today, the government has confirmed that, following public consultation last year, it is going ahead with the expansion of community water fluoridation across the North-East of England.  

    Water fluoridation is the process of adding fluoride to public water supplies to prevent tooth decay. Around one in 10 people in England currently have fluoride added to their drinking water supplies.

    The findings of all health monitoring reports since 2014 consistently show that water fluoridation is an effective and safe public health measure to reduce the prevalence and severity of tooth decay and reduce dental health inequalities. 

    The expansion of water fluoridation in the North-East is expected to reach an additional 1.6 million people and reduce the number of young children admitted to hospital for the removal of decayed teeth.   

    Cllr David Fothergill, Chairman of the Local Government Association’s Community Wellbeing Board said:

    We are pleased to see new funding for supervised toothbrushing, which is an evidence-based and cost-effective intervention proven to improve children’s oral health. This investment will help address health inequalities by supporting children in the most deprived areas to develop positive brushing habits, preventing tooth decay and reducing the need for hospital treatment.

    This funding builds on the excellent work already being done by many councils up and down the country to improve children’s oral health. The flexibility in how the funding can be used is particularly appreciated, allowing councils to tailor programmes to best meet local needs. Councils are committed to playing their part in improving children’s oral health and reducing inequalities.

    Jason Elsom, Chief Executive of children’s charity Parentkind said:

    As a father to a blended family of 8 children, I know how hard it can be to get children to clean their teeth well, regularly, and consistently, and this is especially true when family life can be so hectic. 

    It’s important that we get the basics right for our children, and things like poor personal or oral hygiene can impact a child’s early years, and beyond. 

    But children all develop in different ways, and at a different pace, and so I commend this initiative to help every child understand the importance of oral hygiene at an early age.

    Dr Urshla Devalia, spokesperson for the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry, said:

    At last, we will see the dial shift on children’s oral health in England. BSPD has been advocating for the importance of a preventative approach to address the crisis in children’s oral health for years.

    Intervening now with a supervised toothbrushing scheme, plus community water fluoridation programmes, are initiatives proven to deliver beneficial oral health outcomes that will pay for themselves several fold in the future.

    We are excited to see this commitment to improving children’s oral health, but there is a lot of work to do, and BSPD is rolling up its sleeves to play its part. This is the decisive action we have been pushing for.

    Anna Gardiner, Deputy Director – Health & Wellbeing at the National Children’s Bureau, said:

    Despite improvements over the past 20 years, too many young children in England start school with tooth decay. Poor oral health can have lasting impacts on their health, wellbeing, and attainment, and a significant risk factor is not getting into the habit of brushing teeth twice per day with fluoride toothpaste.

    So, we welcome the government’s plans to introduce a supervised brushing programme in early years settings, and we look forward to seeing its impact, particularly for those growing up in deprived areas who disproportionately suffer from poor oral health.

    June O’Sullivan OBE, CEO, London Early Years Foundation (LEYF), says:

    Children’s oral health in the UK is in crisis, and for too long, it’s been the silent epidemic no one talks about. Tooth decay doesn’t just cause pain – it disrupts sleep, eating, learning, and the ability to speak clearly, which is crucial for a child’s development and confidence. Unfortunately, the impact is felt most by disadvantaged children which is why this government-backed supervised toothbrushing programme is very much welcomed. 

    At LEYF, we’ve seen first-hand how daily brushing in nurseries transforms children’s oral health and wellbeing. Scaling this nationally will give hundreds of thousands of children the best start in life. While it’s not our role to replace parents in this responsibility, we are committed to supporting our LEYF families. This programme will help educate parents on the importance of oral health and a healthy diet, ensuring good habits are built at home as well as in nursery.

    Notes to editors:

    • For more information about Colgate-Palmolive’s, visit the company’s website at https://www.colgatepalmolive.co.uk/. To learn more about Colgate Bright Smiles, Bright Futures® oral health education program, please visit https://www.colgate.com/en-gb/oral-health-education/our-commitment
    • Fluoride is a naturally occurring mineral found in soil, food and drink and also in drinking water supplies, in varying amounts. In some parts of England the level of fluoride in the public water supply already reaches the target concentration of water fluoridation schemes (one milligram per litre (1mg/l)), sometimes expressed as one part per million (1ppm)), as a result of the geology of the area. In other areas the fluoride concentration has been adjusted to reach this level as part of a fluoridation scheme. More information can be found here: Community water fluoridation expansion in the north east of England – GOV.UK

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 7 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    March 7, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: ‘No-one wants to go through this again’: how disaster-stricken residents in northern NSW are preparing for Cyclone Alfred

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rebecca McNaught, Research Fellow, University of Sydney

    It’s been three years since floods pummelled the Northern Rivers region of New South Wales. Now, Cyclone Alfred is heading for the region, threatening devastation once more.

    On Thursday night and Friday morning, the NSW State Emergency Service asked residents in parts of the Northern Rivers to evacuate. Rain associated with Cyclone Alfred was expected to cause rapid river rises and extensive flooding.

    As you’d expect, many Northern Rivers residents feel very apprehensive right now. No-one wants to go through this again.

    I know of a woman who, just last week, had painters doing final repairs to her home after it flooded in 2022. Other people can’t afford to repair their homes at all.

    Damage from the last floods extends beyond the material. Many people in the Northern Rivers are still dealing with mental health problems such as anxiety, depression and PTSD after the last disaster.

    Still, people are preparing for Cyclone Alfred’s arrival – and drawing lessons from the 2022 floods in the hope of a better outcome this time.

    Memories of Lismore floods

    I have 20 years’ experience working on climate change adaptation and disaster risk management. My research focus includes the Northern Rivers, where I live. Last year, a study I led examined community collaboration across the region in response to disasters.

    The Northern Rivers is located in the NSW northeast and is drained by three major rivers: the Richmond, Tweed and Clarence. The city of Lismore is one of the most flood-prone urban centres in Australia.

    As my colleagues and I have previously written, the 2022 flood in Lismore and surrounds surprised even the most prepared residents.

    Floodwaters in Lismore reached more than two metres higher than the previous record. Shocked residents were left clinging to their roofs. Businesses moved their stock to higher ground, but it was still destroyed. Houses above the so-called “flood line” were inundated.

    Warning systems proved inadequate, and emergency agencies were overwhelmed. More than 10,800 homes were damaged.

    Landslides and boulders fell on homes and roads, leaving people trapped and isolated for up to six weeks. Others could not access cash, petrol, communications, food, schools, carer services and medical assistance for long periods.

    The 2022 floods were by no means the first disaster to befall the Northern Rivers. The region also flooded in 2017. In 2019 the region, like much of Australia, was deep in drought. The Black Summer bushfires hit in 2019-20, and Covid-19 struck in 2020. Parts of the region suffered bushfires in 2023.

    Now, we are facing Cyclone Alfred.

    The scale of the 2022 floods forced many residents to confront a harsh reality: in a disaster, emergency services cannot always help. Sometimes, people must fend for themselves.

    That realisation prompted a growing community-led resilience movement. As Cyclone Alfred approaches, that network has swung into action.




    Read more:
    When disaster strikes, emergency responders can’t respond to every call. Communities must be helped to help themselves


    A community coming together

    Since 2022, community-resilience groups have emerged in each local government area across the region. The groups comprise, and are led by, community volunteers.

    In my local government area, Byron Shire, there are 13 community resilience groups. I co-lead my local group.

    We work with local organisations, government agencies and emergency services to help the community before, during and after a disaster. The local council convenes regular meetings between all these organisations.

    My research shows strong information flows are crucial in disaster preparedness and recovery.

    Since the Cyclone Alfred threat began, my community group has received regular updates from the SES on matters such as locations of sandbags and sand, the latest weather information advice, and when evacuation centres will open.

    We also have an established a network of contacts who live on streets vulnerable to flooding. We pass on relevant information to other residents via Facebook and a WhatsApp group. In the past day we have been exchanging information such as whether flood pumps are working and the extent of beach erosion.

    The flow of information is two-way. Byron Shire’s community resilience network is chaired by the local council, and has links to emergency management – the “lights and sirens” people. In this way, community knowledge and contributions are recognised and valued by decision-makers and other officials.

    In recent days our group has fed advice up the chain to emergency services, such as the location of elderly and vulnerable people who may need help to evacuate.

    A man holding a portable emergency satellite provided to a community resilience group in the Northern Rivers.
    Facebook

    Byron Shire Council has also loaned portable Starlink satellite dishes to some community-resilience groups. These devices provide essential and communication if phone and internet services fail in a disaster.

    On a broader level, the Bureau of Meteorology is producing regular video updates about Cyclone Alfred in clear, plain language. This is helping to communicate the risks widely and give people the information they need.

    Community resilience groups also seek to adopt a proactive, rather than reactive, approach to disasters – such as helping residents prepare for the next flood event.

    This can be challenging. Many people and organisations in the region have understandably been focused on recovery after the 2022 floods. It can be hard to do this while also preparing for the next disaster.

    And sometimes, people don’t want constant reminders of the potential for flooding. Some people just want to move on and think about something other than disaster.

    If Cyclone Alfred brings destruction to the Northern Rivers, community resilience groups will play a big role in supporting health and wellbeing. Not everyone accesses formal mental health support after disasters. Communities and neighbours looking out for each other is crucial.

    Tough times ahead

    As I write, the Northern Rivers is starting to lose power and internet access. Winds are wild and rain lashed the region all night.

    As climate change worsens, all communities must consider how they will cope with more intense disasters. The model of community-led resilience in the Northern Rivers shows a way forward.

    There is still much work to do in the region. However, our experience of compounding disasters means we are well along the path to finding new ways to support each other through extreme events.




    Read more:
    Lismore faced monster floods all but alone. We must get better at climate adaptation, and fast


    Rebecca McNaught is a Research Fellow at the University Centre for Rural Health (University of Sydney) in Lismore. She has received scholarship funding from the Australian Government’s Research Training Program Stipend. She is affiliated with the South Golden Beach, New Brighton and Ocean Shores Community Resilience Team. She has also conducted paid and voluntary work for the Northern Rivers not-for-profit registered charity Plan C.

    – ref. ‘No-one wants to go through this again’: how disaster-stricken residents in northern NSW are preparing for Cyclone Alfred – https://theconversation.com/no-one-wants-to-go-through-this-again-how-disaster-stricken-residents-in-northern-nsw-are-preparing-for-cyclone-alfred-251650

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    March 7, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 937 938 939 940 941 … 1,471
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress