Category: Natural Disasters

  • MIL-OSI: Xtract One Selected to Support San Mateo Medical Center in Keeping Patients and Staff Secure

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, June 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Xtract One Technologies (TSX: XTRA)(OTCQX: XTRAF)(FRA: 0PL) (“Xtract One” or the “Company”) today announced its SmartGateway has been selected by San Mateo Medical Center, located in San Mateo, CA, to strengthen the facility’s security and provide AI-powered weapon detection. Xtract One’s leading technology-driven threat detection and security solutions are designed to enhance safety for patients, visitors, and staff at the medical center, starting with the main campus with plans to later expand to all satellite clinics.

    This deployment comes at a critical time for healthcare facilities, following California’s recent Assembly Bill (AB) 2975. With hospitals now being required to implement weapons detection screening policies at key entrances as a minimum, San Mateo Medical Center demonstrates its forward-thinking and proactive stance in deploying Xtract One’s cutting-edge technology designed to help elevate safety while enhancing the overall individual experience.

    “With violent incidents being five times more frequent in healthcare facilities than in other industries, we recognize the unique challenge hospitals face in ensuring a safe environment,” said Peter Evans, CEO of Xtract One. “Our SmartGateway has shown proven efficacy in on-site, real-world testing and we are confident that its deployment at San Mateo Medical Center will provide enhanced security that identifies potential threats of all kinds, including firearms and edged weapons, and minimizes disruptions to patients, staff, and visitors. We’re looking forward to working with San Mateo Medical Center and to showcasing how well SmartGateway supports healthcare facilities’ needs.”

    “Our goal is to create a safe and welcoming environment for everyone who enters our facility so that we can focus on what truly matters–our patients’ well-being” said Robet Blake, COO of San Mateo Medical Center. “Deploying Xtract One’s technology at our main campus reinforces that commitment. After extensive testing of various systems, we found SmartGateway’s innovative technology to be the most effective for our facility’s needs, allowing us to stay ahead of potential threats in order to maintain a secure and welcoming campus for everyone.”

    SmartGateway’s breakthrough innovation provides fast, discreet, and reliable individual screening, utilizing AI-powered sensors that unobtrusively scan guests for weapons and other prohibited items as they walk through. This technology replaces traditional metal detectors, reducing the need to empty pockets, optimizing patron experience by reducing time spent in security lines, and providing critical security insights to maximize screening outcomes. SmartGateway is designed to enable seamless passage through checkpoints and promote uninterrupted flow of movement.

    To learn more, visit www.xtractone.com.

    About Xtract One
    Xtract One Technologies is a leading technology-driven provider of threat detection and security solutions leveraging AI to deliver seamless and secure experiences. The Company makes unobtrusive weapons and threat detection systems that are designed to assist facility operators in prioritizing and delivering improved “Walk-right-In” experiences while enhancing safety. Xtract One’s innovative portfolio of AI-powered Gateway solutions excels at allowing facilities to discreetly screen and identify weapons and other threats at points of entry and exit without disrupting the flow of traffic. With solutions built to serve the unique market needs for schools, hospitals, arenas, stadiums, manufacturing, distribution, and other customers, Xtract One is recognized as a market leader delivering the highest security in combination with the best individual experience. For more information, visit www.xtractone.com or connect on Facebook, X, and LinkedIn.

    About San Mateo Medical Center
    San Mateo Medical Center is a public hospital and clinic system fully accredited by The Joint Commission. We operate outpatient clinics throughout the county and an acute-care hospital in San Mateo. Our mission is to “partner with our community to provide excellent healthcare for patients, including those experiencing social, environmental, or economic challenges.” As part of San Mateo County Health, the medical center serves the healthcare needs of all residents of San Mateo County, with an emphasis on education and prevention.

    About Threat Detection and Security Solutions
    Xtract One solutions, when properly configured, deployed, and utilized, are designed to help enhance safety and reduce threats. Given the wide range of potential threats in today’s world, no threat detection system is 100% effective. Xtract One solutions should be utilized as one element in a multilayered approach to physical security.

    Forward Looking Statements
    This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws. All statements that are not historical facts, including without limitation, statements regarding future estimates, plans, programs, forecasts, projections, objectives, assumptions, expectations or beliefs of future performance, are “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “estimates”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be materially different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risks detailed from time to time in the continuous disclosure filings made by the Company with securities regulations. These factors should be considered carefully, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Although the Company has attempted to identify important risk factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other risk factors that cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements. The Company has no obligation to update any forward looking statement, even if new information becomes available as a result of future events, new information or for any other reason except as required by law.

    For further information, please contact:
    Xtract One Inquiries: info@xtractone.com, http://www.xtractone.com   
    Investor Relations: Chris Witty, Darrow Associates, cwitty@darrowir.com, 646-438-9385
    Media Contact: Kristen Aikey, JMG Public Relations, kristen@jmgpr.com, 212-206-1645

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Xtract One Selected to Support San Mateo Medical Center in Keeping Patients and Staff Secure

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, June 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Xtract One Technologies (TSX: XTRA)(OTCQX: XTRAF)(FRA: 0PL) (“Xtract One” or the “Company”) today announced its SmartGateway has been selected by San Mateo Medical Center, located in San Mateo, CA, to strengthen the facility’s security and provide AI-powered weapon detection. Xtract One’s leading technology-driven threat detection and security solutions are designed to enhance safety for patients, visitors, and staff at the medical center, starting with the main campus with plans to later expand to all satellite clinics.

    This deployment comes at a critical time for healthcare facilities, following California’s recent Assembly Bill (AB) 2975. With hospitals now being required to implement weapons detection screening policies at key entrances as a minimum, San Mateo Medical Center demonstrates its forward-thinking and proactive stance in deploying Xtract One’s cutting-edge technology designed to help elevate safety while enhancing the overall individual experience.

    “With violent incidents being five times more frequent in healthcare facilities than in other industries, we recognize the unique challenge hospitals face in ensuring a safe environment,” said Peter Evans, CEO of Xtract One. “Our SmartGateway has shown proven efficacy in on-site, real-world testing and we are confident that its deployment at San Mateo Medical Center will provide enhanced security that identifies potential threats of all kinds, including firearms and edged weapons, and minimizes disruptions to patients, staff, and visitors. We’re looking forward to working with San Mateo Medical Center and to showcasing how well SmartGateway supports healthcare facilities’ needs.”

    “Our goal is to create a safe and welcoming environment for everyone who enters our facility so that we can focus on what truly matters–our patients’ well-being” said Robet Blake, COO of San Mateo Medical Center. “Deploying Xtract One’s technology at our main campus reinforces that commitment. After extensive testing of various systems, we found SmartGateway’s innovative technology to be the most effective for our facility’s needs, allowing us to stay ahead of potential threats in order to maintain a secure and welcoming campus for everyone.”

    SmartGateway’s breakthrough innovation provides fast, discreet, and reliable individual screening, utilizing AI-powered sensors that unobtrusively scan guests for weapons and other prohibited items as they walk through. This technology replaces traditional metal detectors, reducing the need to empty pockets, optimizing patron experience by reducing time spent in security lines, and providing critical security insights to maximize screening outcomes. SmartGateway is designed to enable seamless passage through checkpoints and promote uninterrupted flow of movement.

    To learn more, visit www.xtractone.com.

    About Xtract One
    Xtract One Technologies is a leading technology-driven provider of threat detection and security solutions leveraging AI to deliver seamless and secure experiences. The Company makes unobtrusive weapons and threat detection systems that are designed to assist facility operators in prioritizing and delivering improved “Walk-right-In” experiences while enhancing safety. Xtract One’s innovative portfolio of AI-powered Gateway solutions excels at allowing facilities to discreetly screen and identify weapons and other threats at points of entry and exit without disrupting the flow of traffic. With solutions built to serve the unique market needs for schools, hospitals, arenas, stadiums, manufacturing, distribution, and other customers, Xtract One is recognized as a market leader delivering the highest security in combination with the best individual experience. For more information, visit www.xtractone.com or connect on Facebook, X, and LinkedIn.

    About San Mateo Medical Center
    San Mateo Medical Center is a public hospital and clinic system fully accredited by The Joint Commission. We operate outpatient clinics throughout the county and an acute-care hospital in San Mateo. Our mission is to “partner with our community to provide excellent healthcare for patients, including those experiencing social, environmental, or economic challenges.” As part of San Mateo County Health, the medical center serves the healthcare needs of all residents of San Mateo County, with an emphasis on education and prevention.

    About Threat Detection and Security Solutions
    Xtract One solutions, when properly configured, deployed, and utilized, are designed to help enhance safety and reduce threats. Given the wide range of potential threats in today’s world, no threat detection system is 100% effective. Xtract One solutions should be utilized as one element in a multilayered approach to physical security.

    Forward Looking Statements
    This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable securities laws. All statements that are not historical facts, including without limitation, statements regarding future estimates, plans, programs, forecasts, projections, objectives, assumptions, expectations or beliefs of future performance, are “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “plans”, “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “estimates”, “intends”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, or “believes”, or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, events or developments to be materially different from any future results, events or developments expressed or implied by such forward looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risks detailed from time to time in the continuous disclosure filings made by the Company with securities regulations. These factors should be considered carefully, and readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Although the Company has attempted to identify important risk factors that could cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other risk factors that cause actions, events or results to differ from those anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements. The Company has no obligation to update any forward looking statement, even if new information becomes available as a result of future events, new information or for any other reason except as required by law.

    For further information, please contact:
    Xtract One Inquiries: info@xtractone.com, http://www.xtractone.com   
    Investor Relations: Chris Witty, Darrow Associates, cwitty@darrowir.com, 646-438-9385
    Media Contact: Kristen Aikey, JMG Public Relations, kristen@jmgpr.com, 212-206-1645

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Middle East turmoil lays the case bare for real portfolio diversification – deVere Group

    Source: deVere Group

    June 24 2025 – The volatile developments across the Middle East—culminating in a dramatic US-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Iran—underscore, yet again, a powerful and urgent truth: diversification isn’t optional. It’s a necessity.

    Markets around the world have been on a knife’s edge for nearly two weeks, reacting sharply to every twist in the conflict.

    Brent crude tumbled nearly 5% after Iran’s missile strike on the Al Udeid air base, interpreted by markets as a restrained signal rather than an escalation.

    With confirmation of the ceasefire, European stocks have surged—Germany’s DAX jumped 2%, the French CAC 40 climbed 1.8%, and futures for the S&P 500 in the US are pointing higher. Yet energy stocks have taken a hit as oil prices slide.

    Nigel Green, CEO of global financial advisory deVere Group, said the “whiplash” in prices across commodities, equities, and safe-haven assets is not just a response to geopolitics—it’s a “flashing red warning light” for investors with narrow allocations.

    “The events of the past two weeks are a textbook case for true portfolio diversification,” he says.

    “One day oil is spiking on nuclear fears, the next it’s plunging on de-escalation. Stocks swing wildly depending on headlines out of Tehran or Tel Aviv. You can’t build or preserve wealth if your investment strategy is overly concentrated in one region, sector, or asset class. That’s not a strategy; that’s a gamble.”

    As the conflict escalated, oil prices spiked on fears of supply disruption. Brent crude surged above $72 before crashing back to near $68 following signs of restraint and the ceasefire announcement. Defence stocks rallied while Middle East-exposed emerging markets sank. Gold flirted with $2,400 as investors scrambled for safety.

    Nigel Green says that for investors, this sequence of events should trigger immediate action.

    “Every global investor must ask themselves today: Am I protected against geopolitical shocks? Do I have meaningful exposure to counter-correlated assets? Am I truly diversified across sectors, geographies, currencies, and asset classes?”

    He adds: “Diversification doesn’t mean owning five different tech stocks or parking all your money in a single bond fund. It means uncorrelated positions across the risk spectrum—think gold, infrastructure, dividend-paying stocks, green energy, and alternatives like real estate and digital assets.”

    Nigel Green also warns that while the ceasefire offers relief, it doesn’t remove risk.

    “This truce is fragile. It’s politically brokered and militarily uneasy. One wrong move and tensions could flare again, dragging markets down with them. That’s the danger of relying too heavily on a single narrative or region in your portfolio.”

    The deVere CEO notes that while markets may breathe a sigh of relief in the short term, the deeper issue is structural instability in a critical region for energy, security, and global trade routes.

    “The Middle East remains a geopolitical powder keg, and history tells us that calm doesn’t last.

    “What does last is a properly diversified portfolio, one that absorbs these shocks without falling apart.”

    With global equities rallying and oil prices sliding, some investors may be tempted to lean back into familiar strategies. Nigel Green says this would be a critical mistake.

    “When markets are jittery, many investors double down on what they know—often increasing risk without realising it. What’s needed now is a measured, deliberate shift into broader exposure.”

    He concludes: “You diversify when the skies are clear, so that you’re protected when the storm breaks.

    “But after what we’ve just seen in the Middle East, the need for real diversification isn’t hypothetical, it’s immediate.”

    deVere Group is one of the world’s largest independent advisors of specialist global financial solutions to international, local mass affluent, and high-net-worth clients.  It has a network of offices around the world, more than 80,000 clients, and $14bn under advisement.

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: UN peacekeepers from China to take part in military parade on September 3

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    BEIJING, June 24 (Xinhua) — Chinese troops with experience in UN peacekeeping will take part in a military parade on Sept. 3 to mark the 80th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, Wu Zeke, a spokesman for the Joint Staff of the Central Military Commission, told a press conference on Tuesday.

    The decision not only underscores the solemnity of China’s celebration of the victory in the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, but also demonstrates the country’s commitment to fulfilling its international obligations and safeguarding world peace, Wu Zeke said.

    He noted that in the 35 years since China joined UN peacekeeping operations, the Chinese military has sent more than 50,000 peacekeepers to more than 20 countries and regions around the world, carrying out 26 UN peacekeeping missions. A total of 17 Chinese servicemen have given their lives for world peace, he added.

    According to Wu Zeke, Chinese peacekeepers have always demonstrated courage and professionalism in the face of armed conflicts, pandemic outbreaks or natural disasters, faithfully carrying out their missions to safeguard peace and stability – from demining and ceasefire monitoring to escorting and conducting emergency rescue operations.

    “The Chinese armed forces have always been a strong force fighting for world peace,” he concluded. -0-

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Will the fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel hold? One factor could be crucial to it sticking

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ali Mamouri, Research Fellow, Middle East Studies, Deakin University

    Amir Levy/Getty Images

    After 12 days of war, US President Donald Trump has announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that would bring to an end the most dramatic, direct conflict between the two nations in decades.

    Israel and Iran both agreed to adhere to the ceasefire, though they said they would respond with force to any breach.

    If the ceasefire holds – a big if – the key question will be whether this signals the start of lasting peace, or merely a brief pause before renewed conflict.

    As contemporary war studies show, peace tends to endure under one of two conditions: either the total defeat of one side, or the establishment of mutual deterrence. This means both parties refrain from aggression because the expected costs of retaliation far outweigh any potential gains.

    What did each side gain?

    The war marked a turning point for Israel in its decades-long confrontation with Iran. For the first time, Israel successfully brought a prolonged battle to Iranian soil, shifting the conflict from confrontations with Iranian-backed proxy militant groups to direct strikes on Iran itself.

    This was made possible largely due to Israel’s success over the past two years in weakening Iran’s regional proxy network, particularly Hezbollah in Lebanon and Shiite militias in Syria.

    Over the past two weeks, Israel has inflicted significant damage on Iran’s military and scientific elite, killing several high-ranking commanders and nuclear scientists. The civilian toll was also high.

    Additionally, Israel achieved a major strategic objective by pulling the United States directly into the conflict. In coordination with Israel, the US launched strikes on three of Iran’s primary nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.

    Despite these gains, Israel did not accomplish all of its stated goals. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had voiced support for regime change, urging Iranians to rise up against Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s government, but the senior leadership in Iran remains intact.

    Additionally, Israel did not fully eliminate Iran’s missile program, as Iran continued striking to the last minute before the ceasefire. And Tehran did not acquiesce to Trump’s pre-war demand to end uranium enrichment.

    Although Iran was caught off-guard by Israel’s attacks — particularly as it was engaged in nuclear negotiations with the US — it responded by launching hundreds of missiles towards Israel.

    While many were intercepted, a significant number penetrated Israeli air defences, causing widespread destruction in major cities, dozens of fatalities and hundreds of injuries.

    Iran demonstrated its capacity to strike back, though Israel succeeded in destroying many of its air defence systems, some ballistic missile assets (including missile launchers) and multiple energy facilities.

    Since the beginning of the assault, Iranian officials have repeatedly called for a halt to resume negotiations. Under intense pressure, Iran realised it would not benefit from a prolonged war of attrition with Israel — especially as both nations faced mounting costs and the risk of depleting their military stockpiles if the war continued.

    As theories of victory suggest, success in war is defined not only by the damage inflicted, but by achieving core strategic goals and weakening the enemy’s will and capacity to resist.

    While Israel claims to have achieved the bulk of its objectives, the extent of the damage to Iran’s nuclear program is not fully known, nor is its capacity to continue enriching uranium.

    Both sides could remain locked in a volatile standoff over Iran’s nuclear program, with the conflict potentially reigniting whenever either side perceives a strategic opportunity.

    Sticking point over Iran’s nuclear program

    Iran faces even greater challenges as it emerges from the war. With a heavy toll on its leadership and nuclear infrastructure, Tehran will likely prioritise rebuilding its deterrence capability.

    That includes acquiring new advanced air defence systems — potentially from China — and restoring key components of its missile and nuclear programs. (Some experts say Iran did not use some of its most powerful missiles to maintain this deterrence.)

    Iranian officials have claimed they safeguarded more than 400 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium before the attacks. This stockpile could theoretically be converted into nine to ten nuclear warheads if further enriched to 90%.

    Trump declared Iran’s nuclear capacity had been “totally obliterated”, whereas Rafael Grossi, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog chief, said damage to Iran’s facilities was “very significant”.

    However, analysts have argued Iran will still have a depth of technical knowledge accumulated over decades. Depending on the extent of the damage to its underground facilities, Iran could be capable of restoring and even accelerating its program in a relatively short time frame.

    And the chances of reviving negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program appear slimmer than ever.

    What might future deterrence look like?

    The war has fundamentally reshaped how both Iran and Israel perceive deterrence — and how they plan to secure it going forward.

    For Iran, the conflict reinforced the belief that its survival is at stake. With regime change openly discussed during the war, Iran’s leaders appear more convinced than ever that true deterrence requires two key pillars: nuclear weapons capability, and deeper strategic alignment with China and Russia.

    As a result, Iran is expected to move rapidly to restore and advance its nuclear program, potentially moving towards actual weaponisation — a step it had long avoided, officially.

    At the same time, Tehran is likely to accelerate military and economic cooperation with Beijing and Moscow to hedge against isolation. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi emphasised this close engagement with Russia during a visit to Moscow this week, particularly on nuclear matters.

    Israel, meanwhile, sees deterrence as requiring constant vigilance and a credible threat of overwhelming retaliation. In the absence of diplomatic breakthroughs, Israel may adopt a policy of immediate preemptive strikes on Iranian facilities or leadership figures if it detects any new escalation — particularly related to Iran’s nuclear program.

    In this context, the current ceasefire appears fragile. Without comprehensive negotiations that address the core issues — namely, Iran’s nuclear capabilities — the pause in hostilities may prove temporary.

    Mutual deterrence may prevent a more protracted war for now, but the balance remains precarious and could collapse with little warning.

    Ali Mamouri does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Will the fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel hold? One factor could be crucial to it sticking – https://theconversation.com/will-the-fragile-ceasefire-between-iran-and-israel-hold-one-factor-could-be-crucial-to-it-sticking-259669

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Will the fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel hold? One factor could be crucial to it sticking

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ali Mamouri, Research Fellow, Middle East Studies, Deakin University

    Amir Levy/Getty Images

    After 12 days of war, US President Donald Trump has announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that would bring to an end the most dramatic, direct conflict between the two nations in decades.

    Israel and Iran both agreed to adhere to the ceasefire, though they said they would respond with force to any breach.

    If the ceasefire holds – a big if – the key question will be whether this signals the start of lasting peace, or merely a brief pause before renewed conflict.

    As contemporary war studies show, peace tends to endure under one of two conditions: either the total defeat of one side, or the establishment of mutual deterrence. This means both parties refrain from aggression because the expected costs of retaliation far outweigh any potential gains.

    What did each side gain?

    The war marked a turning point for Israel in its decades-long confrontation with Iran. For the first time, Israel successfully brought a prolonged battle to Iranian soil, shifting the conflict from confrontations with Iranian-backed proxy militant groups to direct strikes on Iran itself.

    This was made possible largely due to Israel’s success over the past two years in weakening Iran’s regional proxy network, particularly Hezbollah in Lebanon and Shiite militias in Syria.

    Over the past two weeks, Israel has inflicted significant damage on Iran’s military and scientific elite, killing several high-ranking commanders and nuclear scientists. The civilian toll was also high.

    Additionally, Israel achieved a major strategic objective by pulling the United States directly into the conflict. In coordination with Israel, the US launched strikes on three of Iran’s primary nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.

    Despite these gains, Israel did not accomplish all of its stated goals. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had voiced support for regime change, urging Iranians to rise up against Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s government, but the senior leadership in Iran remains intact.

    Additionally, Israel did not fully eliminate Iran’s missile program, as Iran continued striking to the last minute before the ceasefire. And Tehran did not acquiesce to Trump’s pre-war demand to end uranium enrichment.

    Although Iran was caught off-guard by Israel’s attacks — particularly as it was engaged in nuclear negotiations with the US — it responded by launching hundreds of missiles towards Israel.

    While many were intercepted, a significant number penetrated Israeli air defences, causing widespread destruction in major cities, dozens of fatalities and hundreds of injuries.

    Iran demonstrated its capacity to strike back, though Israel succeeded in destroying many of its air defence systems, some ballistic missile assets (including missile launchers) and multiple energy facilities.

    Since the beginning of the assault, Iranian officials have repeatedly called for a halt to resume negotiations. Under intense pressure, Iran realised it would not benefit from a prolonged war of attrition with Israel — especially as both nations faced mounting costs and the risk of depleting their military stockpiles if the war continued.

    As theories of victory suggest, success in war is defined not only by the damage inflicted, but by achieving core strategic goals and weakening the enemy’s will and capacity to resist.

    While Israel claims to have achieved the bulk of its objectives, the extent of the damage to Iran’s nuclear program is not fully known, nor is its capacity to continue enriching uranium.

    Both sides could remain locked in a volatile standoff over Iran’s nuclear program, with the conflict potentially reigniting whenever either side perceives a strategic opportunity.

    Sticking point over Iran’s nuclear program

    Iran faces even greater challenges as it emerges from the war. With a heavy toll on its leadership and nuclear infrastructure, Tehran will likely prioritise rebuilding its deterrence capability.

    That includes acquiring new advanced air defence systems — potentially from China — and restoring key components of its missile and nuclear programs. (Some experts say Iran did not use some of its most powerful missiles to maintain this deterrence.)

    Iranian officials have claimed they safeguarded more than 400 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium before the attacks. This stockpile could theoretically be converted into nine to ten nuclear warheads if further enriched to 90%.

    Trump declared Iran’s nuclear capacity had been “totally obliterated”, whereas Rafael Grossi, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog chief, said damage to Iran’s facilities was “very significant”.

    However, analysts have argued Iran will still have a depth of technical knowledge accumulated over decades. Depending on the extent of the damage to its underground facilities, Iran could be capable of restoring and even accelerating its program in a relatively short time frame.

    And the chances of reviving negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program appear slimmer than ever.

    What might future deterrence look like?

    The war has fundamentally reshaped how both Iran and Israel perceive deterrence — and how they plan to secure it going forward.

    For Iran, the conflict reinforced the belief that its survival is at stake. With regime change openly discussed during the war, Iran’s leaders appear more convinced than ever that true deterrence requires two key pillars: nuclear weapons capability, and deeper strategic alignment with China and Russia.

    As a result, Iran is expected to move rapidly to restore and advance its nuclear program, potentially moving towards actual weaponisation — a step it had long avoided, officially.

    At the same time, Tehran is likely to accelerate military and economic cooperation with Beijing and Moscow to hedge against isolation. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi emphasised this close engagement with Russia during a visit to Moscow this week, particularly on nuclear matters.

    Israel, meanwhile, sees deterrence as requiring constant vigilance and a credible threat of overwhelming retaliation. In the absence of diplomatic breakthroughs, Israel may adopt a policy of immediate preemptive strikes on Iranian facilities or leadership figures if it detects any new escalation — particularly related to Iran’s nuclear program.

    In this context, the current ceasefire appears fragile. Without comprehensive negotiations that address the core issues — namely, Iran’s nuclear capabilities — the pause in hostilities may prove temporary.

    Mutual deterrence may prevent a more protracted war for now, but the balance remains precarious and could collapse with little warning.

    Ali Mamouri does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Will the fragile ceasefire between Iran and Israel hold? One factor could be crucial to it sticking – https://theconversation.com/will-the-fragile-ceasefire-between-iran-and-israel-hold-one-factor-could-be-crucial-to-it-sticking-259669

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Western Cape, Northern Cape residents urged to be cautious amid cold front

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Western Cape, Northern Cape residents urged to be cautious amid cold front

    Communities have been urged by the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (CoGTA), Velenkosini Hlabisa, to be cautious as an intense cold front is anticipated to impact parts of the Western Cape and Northern Cape from Wednesday to Friday.

    According to the South African Weather Service (SAWS), a cold front will make landfall tomorrow over the south-western regions of the country, bringing heavy rainfall, strong winds, snow, and extremely rough sea conditions.

    The weather service has warned the public about the potential impact of heavy rainfall expected in the western parts of the Western Cape, especially in low-lying and poorly drained areas, saying this could result in localised flooding from Wednesday into Thursday.

    Forecasters have also predicted that roads may become wet and slippery, significantly increasing the risk of road accidents. The public, especially motorists, are urged to drive with caution, reduce speed, and avoid flooded roads.

    The SAWS said strong, gusty winds over the interior may cause localised structural damage and uproot trees, posing risks to property and lives.

    “As a government, we are deeply concerned about the possible impact of this approaching cold front. We call on all residents, especially those in vulnerable areas, to remain alert, follow official weather updates, and take precautionary steps to protect their lives and property,” Hlabisa said.

    The Minister urged municipalities, provincial disaster management centres, and all stakeholders in the affected provinces to remain vigilant, activate contingency plans, and ensure rapid response measures are implemented to assist communities in need.

    Cold to icy conditions are expected, with possible snowfall over the western mountain ranges of the Western Cape, extending into the south-western interior of the Northern Cape.

    According to the department, severe weather is anticipated to affect the maritime sector. 

    Gale-force winds and rough seas with wave heights of 5.5 to 7.5 metres are expected along the Northern Cape and Western Cape coastlines.

    “This could cause major disruptions to the fishing and port operations and increase the risk of vessels capsizing and accidents at sea.” 

    Coastal residents, fishers, and beachgoers are strongly advised to stay away from the shoreline and follow maritime safety warnings.

    As a cold front moves eastward, the Eastern Cape is expected to feel its effects on Thursday, 26 June, with strong and damaging winds spreading across much of the province, which is already prone to weather-related incidents.

    By Friday, 27 June, the department warned that cold and windy conditions will extend into parts of the interior of the eastern provinces, with daytime temperatures dropping significantly. – SAnews.gov.za

    Gabisile

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Operation Shanela nets 15 372

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Operation Shanela nets 15 372

    Over 15 000 individuals have been arrested in the ongoing Operation Shanela operation, said the South African Police Service (SAPS).

    According to the SAPS, these successes stem from proactive policing tactics, including high-visibility patrols, roadblocks, stop-and-search initiatives and intelligence-led suspect tracing.

    From 16 -22 June 2025, 15 372 arrests were made.

    Among those arrested were 2,400 wanted individuals, linked to serious and violent crimes (murder, attempted murder, rape, robbery), while a further 159 suspects were arrested for murder (62 in Gauteng and 43 in the Western Cape).

    Other key arrests include: 
    •    86 for attempted murder
    •    100 for rape, with Gauteng leading at 25 arrests
    •    1173 for assault with intent to cause grievous bodily harm (GBH)
    •    235 identified drug dealers
    •    2602 for drug possession, most in the Western Cape (1460)
    •    67 for illegal firearm possession, with 22 from KwaZulu-Natal
    •    14 for human trafficking
    •    1328 illegal foreign nationals detained
    •    1140 drivers arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol and drugs- KwaZulu-Natal (411), Mpumalanga (225), Western Cape (195) and Gauteng (144)

    Police also recovered and confiscated 102 firearms, 1,278 rounds of ammunition and 64 hijacked or stolen vehicles.

    In the North West, two suspects were arrested for the fatal shooting of an elderly couple in Rustenburg where a firearm was recovered. Additionally, police intercepted two vehicles on the N1 near Makhado carrying dagga valued at R3 million.

    In KwaZulu-Natal, a 49-year-old man arrested in Adams Mission for illegal possession of two AK-47s and a pistol. Ammunition was also seized.

    Meanwhile in Gauteng police apprehended three Mozambican nationals in Kingsway for cross-border motorcycle theft. Police also found dismantled motorcycle parts found prepared for smuggling.

    In the Eastern Cape two Lesotho nationals were arrested for human trafficking where 10 children were rescued in Matatiele.

    “SAPS remains committed to relentless, multidisciplinary crime prevention through Operation Shanela and related initiatives. The National Commissioner of Police, General Fannie Masemola, applauded the dedication of all police officers and partners who collaborated with the police,” the South African Police Service said in a statement on Monday. – SAnews.gov.za

    Edwin

    MIL OSI Africa

  • Nuclear watchdog IAEA sounds alarm over ‘grave threat’ following Iran atomic site attacks

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Tensions in the Middle East escalated dramatically following a series of devastating air attacks exchanged between Israel and Iran, triggered by a direct U.S. military strike on three of Iran’s major nuclear facilities. Explosions shook Tehran as Israel launched coordinated assaults on government and military installations across Iran. In retaliation, Iran fired multiple waves of missiles and drones into Israeli territory, with strikes reported in several cities.

    As part of its sweeping offensive, the Israeli Defense Forces targeted the entrance of Tehran’s Evin Prison—a high-security facility known for housing political prisoners, dual nationals, and regime critics—signaling an expansion of Israeli objectives beyond strictly military targets.

    Amid the intensifying crisis, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf declared that the legislature is weighing legislation to suspend all cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Qalibaf insisted Iran remains committed to peaceful nuclear activity but criticized the agency’s alleged politicization and failure to uphold its professional commitments. He warned that continued non-compliance by the IAEA could force Iran to withdraw entirely from cooperation.

    The conflict’s ripple effects spread across the region, prompting major energy companies operating in Iraq—such as Eni, BP, and Total Energies—to begin emergency evacuations of foreign personnel, according to Iraq’s state-run Basra Oil Company. Meanwhile, the U.S. Embassy in Qatar issued an urgent advisory instructing American citizens to stay indoors until further notice, citing the ongoing hostilities and U.S. air operations against Iranian nuclear infrastructure.

    In Vienna, Rafael Grossi, Director General of the IAEA, convened an emergency session of the agency’s Board of Governors to address the unfolding situation. He urged Iran to restore full IAEA access to nuclear facilities, particularly to monitor enriched uranium stockpiles. Grossi confirmed that Iran’s key sites at Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan were struck by cruise missiles and ground-penetrating munitions. While no abnormal radiation levels have been detected off-site, he emphasized the urgency of negotiations and a return to technical oversight. IAEA inspectors remain in Iran and are prepared to resume their duties, he said.

    Grossi’s call for restraint and transparency came as Tehran signaled its intent to limit cooperation with the agency unless provided with credible assurances regarding the IAEA’s impartial conduct.

    As diplomatic efforts intensified, Russian President Vladimir Putin met with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi in Moscow. Expressing firm support for Iran, Putin condemned the U.S. and Israeli strikes as an “unprovoked act of aggression” and reiterated Russia’s strategic alliance with Tehran. He noted ongoing consultations with U.S. President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, UAE President Mohammed Al Nahyan, and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian.

    During the meeting, Araghchi denounced the attacks on Iran’s facilities as violations of international law and expressed gratitude for Russia’s steadfast position. Both sides affirmed their commitment to maintaining close coordination as the regional crisis continues to unfold.

  • Sensex, Nifty end higher amid Iran-Israel truce tensions

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    The Indian stock markets ended Tuesday on a positive note, even though benchmark indices gave up most of their early gains due to fresh geopolitical concerns.

    After rising over 1 per cent in early trade, both the Sensex and Nifty settled with modest gains as news emerged of a possible breach in the newly announced ceasefire between Iran and Israel.

    The Sensex had touched an intra-day high of 83,018.16 but later pared its gains and closed at 82,055.11. It still ended the day with a gain of 158.32 points, or 0.19 per cent.

    The Nifty, too, saw volatility through the day. It moved between 25,317.70 and 24,999.70 before settling at 25,044.35, up by 72.45 points or 0.29 per cent.

    Market experts said that while the initial surge was driven by optimism around the ceasefire announcement, the mood turned cautious after reports hinted at renewed tensions in the Middle East.

    “The Nifty’s failure to surpass the 25,200-resistance level indicates that the bears are still active and not ready to give in,” Ajit Mishra of Religare Broking Limited said.

    He added that participants are advised to maintain a positive yet cautious stance, with a strong focus on stock selection driven by sectoral trends.

    Among the top performers in the Nifty index were Adani Ports, Shriram Finance, Grasim Industries and Tata Steel. These stocks rose by 2.89 per cent.

    On the other hand, ONGC, IndusInd Bank, Power Grid Corporation, Trent and HCL Technologies were among the biggest losers, falling up to 2.90 per cent.

    Broader markets also ended higher. The Nifty Midcap100 index closed up 0.71 per cent, while the Nifty Smallcap100 gained 0.72 per cent.

    “Initial gains in the domestic market, driven by the ceasefire announcement and sharp drop in crude prices, were short-lived as renewed geopolitical tensions in the Middle East unsettled investor sentiment,” Vinod Nair of Geojit Investments Limited stated.

    “Going forward, the sustainability of an uptrend will hinge on the strength of domestic earnings, with optimism surrounding the upcoming Q1 results supported by favourable domestic macroeconomics,” he added.

    Volatility in the market eased slightly, as the India VIX — the volatility index — dropped 2.88 per cent to close at 13.64.

    (IANS)

  • MIL-OSI: Bitcoin Solaris Gains Momentum with Confirmed LBank Exchange Listing

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TALLINN, Estonia, June 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Bitcoin Solaris (BTC-S) has officially confirmed its upcoming listing on LBank, a leading centralized exchange known for accelerating the visibility and accessibility of promising digital assets. This announcement marks a major milestone in the Bitcoin Solaris roadmap, offering new liquidity opportunities for token holders and opening the door to global trading participation ahead of its public launch.

    Why LBank Listing Is a Game-Changer for Bitcoin Solaris

    LBank isn’t just another exchange. It’s a global launchpad for emerging crypto projects. With its strong community, aggressive marketing, and track record of igniting early token momentum, getting listed on LBank can instantly elevate a project’s credibility, exposure, and trading volume.

    For Bitcoin Solaris, this isn’t just a listing. It’s a strategic move that opens the floodgates for new investor capital ahead of its price jump from $9 to a confirmed $20 launch. And with over 12,300 unique presale participants already locked in, the LBank listing comes at the perfect time to ride that wave of momentum into secondary markets.

    Bitcoin Solaris: Built to Outpace the Old Guard

    Bitcoin Solaris operates on real-world delivery. It’s not just a whitepaper promise. It’s a dual-layer blockchain already tested to support:

    • 10,000 transactions per second
    • 2-second finality
    • 99.95% energy savings compared to Bitcoin
    • Solana-level speed with Bitcoin-grade trust

    The base layer runs Proof-of-Work for unmatched decentralization, while the Solaris Layer uses Delegated Proof-of-Stake for blazing-fast execution. This hybrid design is what makes BTC-S both secure and scalable, a rare combination.

    From Zero to Wealth: How BTC-S Levels the Crypto Playing Field

    LBank Fuels What Crypto Vlog Calls “The Perfect Entry Point”

    Influencer channels are buzzing about Bitcoin Solaris. Crypto Vlog, a respected voice in crypto reviews, recently released a full segment covering BTC-S’s presale strength, mobile-first mining model, and now the major catalyst that is the LBank listing.

    The review emphasizes how the listing could dramatically improve market depth, provide exposure to new retail and institutional buyers, and potentially trigger a liquidity surge during its first trading hours. For a project already trending, this is the match to the fuel.

    Mobile Mining and the New Wealth Paradigm

    Bitcoin Solaris lets users earn BTC-S tokens directly from their phones through the upcoming Solaris Nova app. This one-click mining interface supports:

    • Smartphones (iOS/Android)
    • Desktops and laptops
    • ASIC and GPU setups

    Users can preview earnings through the mining calculator, giving a real-time view of what mining participation can generate. And with the upcoming LBank liquidity, those tokens can now flow directly into global trading markets, no complex bridge required.

    Tokenomics: Designed for Demand and Scarcity

    Bitcoin Solaris follows a hard-capped 21 million supply model, mimicking Bitcoin’s deflationary success while adding modern distribution logic:

    • 66.66% allocated for mining (over 90 years)
    • 20% allocated to presale
    • 13.34% for liquidity and ecosystem expansion

    This structure ensures BTC-S isn’t just a short-term pump. It’s built for longevity, rewarding both miners and long-term holders.

    The Countdown to LBank: What Comes Next?

    Now that the LBank listing has been confirmed, Bitcoin Solaris is entering its next evolutionary phase:

    • Global trading opens for BTC-S
    • Wider audience gain across Asia, Europe, and LATAM
    • Accelerated roadmap execution: from testnet to full mainnet deployment
    • More exchange listings are already in negotiation

    Presale Frenzy: Phase 9 Heats Up with Over 12,300 Users Onboard

    Bitcoin Solaris isn’t just getting listed. It’s doing so while riding the momentum of one of the most explosive presales in crypto history. Currently in phase 9, BTC-S is priced at $9, with the final phase at $10 and a confirmed launch price of $20. That’s a 150% projected return, and it’s not speculation. It’s simple math.

    This is a limited-time event:

    • Bonus: 7% on all current purchases
    • Launch Date: July 31, 2025
    • Over 12,300+ participants already locked in
    • More than $5 million raised and counting
    • Less than 6 weeks remain before doors close

    With the LBank listing around the corner, buyers are racing to grab BTC-S before it hits open markets and the price doubles. If you missed TRON under a penny or Solana under a dollar, this could be your moment to rewrite the playbook.

    Final Word

    With a strategic exchange partnership confirmed and a robust ecosystem in place, Bitcoin Solaris is rapidly shifting from early-stage token to fully operational blockchain platform. The upcoming LBank listing is not just a moment of market entry—it’s the start of a new phase of accessibility, growth, and real-world use.

    As the final presale phase concludes and launch day draws closer, early supporters are positioning themselves ahead of the transition into global trading.

    Explore Bitcoin Solaris:

    Website: bitcoinsolaris.com
    Telegram: t.me/Bitcoinsolaris
    X: x.com/BitcoinSolaris.

    Media Contact

    Xander Levine

    press@bitcoinsolaris.com

    Press Kit: Available upon request

    Disclaimer: This is a paid post and is provided by Bitcoin Solaris. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. We do not guarantee any claims, statements, or promises made in this article. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing in crypto and mining-related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. It is possible to lose all your capital. These products may not be suitable for everyone, and you should ensure that you understand the risks involved. Seek independent advice if necessary. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector—including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining—complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility. Globenewswire does not endorse any content on this page.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at:

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/20e8a5ff-539d-487e-ba58-44407ae8d95b

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/fe62cbd5-8eec-4209-98f6-285899126e0c

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ecf38dc9-478c-4c6b-aeea-51c023695b01

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1e5a479f-aea8-4517-9114-9520318a9121

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Royal step around the Isle of Sheppey

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Royal step around the Isle of Sheppey

    Newly-opened 28-mile walking route in north Kent is part of the 2,700-mile King Charles III England Coast Path. Trail covers wildlife haven and historical sites

    The King Charles III England Coast Path contributes to what will be the world’s longest managed coastal trail. Photo: Explore Kent

    For the first time, residents and visitors can enjoy the new 28-mile (45km) stretch of the King Charles III England Coast Path on the Isle of Sheppey, in north Kent.

    The route, more than 80 per cent of the island’s total coast path, was opened by Natural England today. This section becomes part of what will be the world’s longest managed trail when all 2,700 miles are joined up.

    The easy-to-follow path, which has stunning views across the Swale and Medway estuaries, takes you through grazing land, the picturesque historic harbour of Queenborough and 2 National Nature Reserves.

    James Seymour, Natural England deputy director for Sussex and Kent, said: 

    It’s really exciting that this stretch of the King Charles III England Coast Path is open on the Isle of Sheppey for local residents and visitors to enjoy.

    With its summer breeding and winter migratory birds, and far-reaching views across the Swale Estuary, it is a haven to experience.

    We know the health and wellbeing benefits of connecting with nature, and this path should also benefit the local community as walkers pass the businesses on route to shop, for refreshments and to stay.

    I am personally looking forward to walking the route with my family.

    Whether Leysdown beach, wildlife havens or historic sites, the 28-mile route around Sheppey takes some fabulous views. Photo: Explore Kent

    The trail starts on the mainland, past Swale railway station, and across the Kingsferry Bridge footway onto the Isle of Sheppey.

    The Kingsferry Bridge is a combined road and railway vertical-lift structure. This allows large boats access along the Swale estuary, which separates the island from mainland Kent. To the west, you can see the more modern 35-metre-high Sheppey Crossing bridge.

    Once on the island, going clockwise and heading west, the trail follows the raised flood defence bank through grazing land to the west coast at Rushenden. There are views here across the Swale and Medway estuaries. It then turns inland to the picturesque and historic harbour at Queenborough.

    Following the sea wall, you turn inland from the industrial Port of Sheerness and past the streets of ‘Blue Town’, a residential area next to the port, where the inhabitants in Napoleonic times pilfered blue paint from the dockyard to paint their houses. You then return to the seawall on the north coast of the island.

    The path follows the seafront promenade to Minster, past beach huts, and gradually ascends the sloped cliffs where there are excellent views across the River Thames to Southend.

    It then passes inland to Oak Lane. The path between Oak Lane and Warden Bay is not yet open and walkers are advised to catch a bus from the nearby bus stops. They can resume their walk heading south along the coast, through the bustling beach town of Leysdown-on-Sea.

    Shellness beach, on the south of the Isle of Sheppey, is included in the new coast path. Photo: Explore Kent

    The trail continues south before turning west into the Swale National Nature Reserve at Shellness. The path along the south coast of the island mostly follows the coastline and passes the quaint St Thomas the Apostle Church at Harty, dating back to the 11th or 12th centuries, then the old Ferry House Inn.

    From here there is a new section of the path that follows the seawall before turning inland around Bells Creek and on through to Elmley National Nature Reserve. This allows people to explore all of the south coast of the island for the first time.

    There are amazing views of the wildlife from the seawalls of the Swale NNR, and from hides within Elmley NNR. West of Elmley, the trail returns to the Kent mainland back over Kingsferry Bridge.

    The Swale estuary is a haven for wildlife, as it supports thousands of migratory wintering birds, including dark-bellied brent geese, oyster catchers and curlew, and summer breeding birds include redshank, shelduck and lapwing.

    Paul Webb, Kent County Council cabinet member for community and regulatory services, welcomed the opening of the new coast path. He said:

    “This stretch offers the chance to experience history and nature in equal measure. The long stretch of new access along the south coast of the island provides Kent residents and visitors the opportunity to experience a wealth of nature as it passes through 2 national nature reserves and some of the richest habitat in the UK.  

    “It is also a coast with a rich history, the trail passing through Queenborough and Sheerness historic ports. It is sure to become a firm favourite with visitors to the area and a boost to the local economy. It is particularly pleasing that local volunteers have been actively involved in the delivery of the project.”

    Background 

    This new stretch takes the walkable length of the King Charles III England Coast Path to 1,772 miles, 66 per cent of the entire route now open.

    Natural England worked on the stretch with a number of partners, including Kent County Council, Ramblers, Swale Borough Council, RSPB, Elmley National Nature Reserve, Shellness Estate, Bird Wise North Kent and Pyramid Project.

    Public transport links: There is a railway across the Kingsferry Bridge to Sheerness docks. There are regular public bus routes that connect with the mainland including Iwade and Sittingbourne. The bus routes use the main roads to connect the main towns such as Queenborough, Sheerness, Minster, Eastchurch, Warden and Leysdown with the mainland.

    Walkers can access maps of the route and any local diversions at www.nationaltrail.co.uk/. And check for any restrictions to access at Natural England – Open Access maps.

    Contact us:

    Journalists only: 0800 141 2743 or communications_se@environment-agency.gov.uk.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: IOM Assists Displaced Families as Floods Hit Brazil’s Rio Grande do Sul Again

    Source: International Organization for Migration (IOM)

    Brasília, 24 June 2025 – In the wake of heavy rains that have battered Brazil’s southern state of Rio Grande do Sul since mid-June, the International Organization for Migration (IOM) is supporting response efforts to assist affected communities. More than 5,000 people have been displaced, with over 1,000 currently staying in temporary shelters. Local authorities report four deaths, one person missing, and damage across 132 municipalities.

    The municipality of Jaguari has declared a state of public calamity, while 21 others have issued a state of emergency. These floods come just one year after Rio Grande do Sul experienced its most severe floods on record, with many of the same communities once again forced to abandon their homes.

    “We extend our deepest condolences to the families who lost loved ones and stand with the thousands who have been forced to flee their homes,” said Paolo Caputo, IOM Chief of Mission in Brazil. “Communities in Rio Grande do Sul have shown remarkable strength, but they should not have to face these crises alone. As extreme weather events become more frequent and intense, humanitarian action must go hand in hand with investments in preparedness and resilience. We remain committed to working alongside authorities and partners to help people rebuild their lives with dignity.”

    Since the beginning of this year’s floods, IOM has been supporting federal, state and local authorities to assess needs, reinforce preparedness, and provide direct assistance to people affected. The Organization’s presence and partnerships in the region, scaled up during the 2024 emergency, have enabled a quick and coordinated response.

    In 2024, IOM played a central role in managing Humanitarian Reception Centers, known locally as CHAs, in the cities of Porto Alegre and Canoas. These centres hosted more than 1,000 people over nearly a year, providing emergency shelter, basic services, and a pathway toward recovery. Non-food items previously used in the CHAs were handed over to the Government of Rio Grande do Sul or donated to municipalities, which are now redistributing them to temporary shelters for families displaced by the ongoing floods.

    Beyond the delivery of relief items, IOM is now focused on supporting recovery efforts through technical guidance, helping authorities carry out needs assessments and plan for sustainable solutions. The goal is to ensure that the response reaches those most in need and that systems are in place to help communities recover safely and sustainably.

    IOM remains committed to supporting the people of Rio Grande do Sul as they address both the immediate and longer-term impacts of this latest disaster. While affected communities continue to show remarkable resilience, additional support will be essential to help displaced families regain stability and access the services they need in the coming weeks and months.

    For more information, please visit IOM’s Media Centre.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI China: China’s UN peacekeeping veterans to participate in Sept. 3 military parade 2025-06-24 16:49:15

    Source: People’s Republic of China – Ministry of National Defense

      BEIJING, June 24 (Xinhua) — Chinese troops with UN peacekeeping experiences will participate in the Sept. 3 military parade marking the 80th anniversary of the victory against Japanese aggression and fascism, said a senior military officer at a press conference on Tuesday.

      This arrangement not only highlights China’s solemn commemoration of the victory in the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, but also demonstrates the country’s commitment to fulfilling international obligations and safeguarding world peace, said Wu Zeke, a senior officer of the Joint Staff Department of the Central Military Commission.

      Wu noted that throughout the 35 years since China joined UN peacekeeping operations, the Chinese military has deployed more than 50,000 peacekeepers to over 20 countries and regions, undertaking 26 UN peacekeeping missions. A total of 17 Chinese servicemembers have made the ultimate sacrifice in the pursuit of world peace, Wu added.

      From mine clearance and ceasefire monitoring to security patrols and emergency rescue operations, Chinese peacekeepers have consistently demonstrated courage and professionalism in the face of armed conflicts, pandemic outbreaks and natural disasters, faithfully fulfilling their mandate to safeguard peace and stability, according to Wu.

      “The Chinese military has always been a steadfast force for world peace,” said Wu. 

    loading…

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: China’s Sept. 3 military parade to display improved weapons, equipment 2025-06-24 16:49:15

    Source: People’s Republic of China – Ministry of National Defense

      BEIJING, June 24 (Xinhua) — The weapons and equipment to be displayed in China’s Sept. 3 military parade embody the Chinese military’s system-based combat capabilities, new-domain and new-quality combat strength and strategic deterrence power, said a senior military officer at a press conference on Tuesday.

      All the equipment and weapons to be displayed during the parade will be active-duty main battle equipment. They embody China’s independent innovation capacity in weapons and equipment development, said Wu Zeke, a senior officer of the Joint Staff Department of the Central Military Commission.

      These weapons and equipment are all domestically produced and offer higher strike precision, improved battlefield adaptability and greater combat effectiveness, according to Wu.

      China announced on Tuesday that it will hold a military parade in Tian’anmen Square in Beijing on Sept. 3 to mark the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War.

      Wu added that all weapons and equipment in the parade will be selected from combat units of various services and arms — including elements of strategic strike forces, advanced operational and tactical equipment, as well as new types of forces suited to future warfare.

      The equipment on display will also cover a full spectrum of capabilities, such as command and control, reconnaissance and early warning, air and missile defense, fire strike and integrated support.

      In addition, the parade is organized according to combat groups, embodying the core principles of information dominance, system-of-systems support, elite force operations and joint-force victory, said Wu.

      Wu added that in recent years, China has overcome numerous cutting-edge technological challenges and developed a large array of advanced weapons and equipment, ushering in a new era in its armaments development.

      New-generation aircraft carriers, destroyers, stealth fighters, drones and strategic missiles have been rapidly commissioned, marking a great leap forward in the Chinese military’s armaments development — and providing strong support for a substantial boost in combat capabilities, said Wu.

      “This has given our military greater confidence in its ability to fight and win,” added Wu.

    loading…

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Ceasefire between Iran and Israel begins – Iranian Press TV

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    JERUSALEM/TEHRAN/NEW YORK, June 24 (Xinhua) — A ceasefire has come into effect after several waves of Iranian attacks on Israel, Iran’s Press TV reported on Tuesday.

    Earlier in the day, the Israeli military said it had intercepted Iranian missiles, without giving an exact time of attack.

    “Some time ago, sirens sounded in several areas of Israel after identifying missiles launched from Iran towards the State of Israel,” the military said in a statement posted on Telegram at around 5 a.m. local time. Iran has since launched several waves of missiles at Israel, according to Iranian state media.

    Israeli airspace is closed to aircraft until further notice, the country’s airports authority said.

    US President Donald Trump earlier said a ceasefire between the two sides would begin at around 04:00 GMT, with Iran set to cease its operations first.

    The Islamic Republic’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had earlier said there was no “agreement” between Iran and Israel on a ceasefire. However, he said Iran was prepared to stop further retaliatory actions if Israeli attacks were stopped by 4 a.m. Tehran time.

    “If Israel stops its illegal aggression against the Iranian people no later than 4 a.m., Iran does not intend to continue retaliatory actions after that,” the Foreign Minister wrote on the X website, adding that Tehran will make a final decision on ending military operations later.

    The conflicting statements have left observers doubtful that a ceasefire has been implemented. As of Monday evening, neither Israel nor Iran had publicly confirmed any agreement. The White House and Pentagon have also made no official statements, and it remains unclear whether the announced truce had been discussed through diplomatic channels or whether the parties intend to adhere to its terms.

    On Monday evening, Trump announced on his social network Truth Social that Israel and Iran had reached a formal agreement on a full and complete ceasefire, marking the end of the “12-day war.” According to him, the ceasefire will initially last for 12 hours, during which the warring parties intend to maintain “peace and respect.”

    Calling the agreement a breakthrough that “could save the Middle East from years of destruction,” Trump concluded his statement with a call for unity. “God bless Israel, God bless Iran, God bless the Middle East, God bless the United States of America, and God bless the world,” he wrote. –0– Oleg

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Israel Accepts Ceasefire Offer, Achieves Goals in Operation Against Iran – B. Netanyahu

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    JERUSALEM/TEHRAN/NEW YORK, June 24 (Xinhua) — Israel has achieved its goals in the operation against Iran and accepted U.S. President Donald Trump’s ceasefire offer, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Tuesday.

    According to a statement from his office, Netanyahu stressed that Israel had achieved its goal of eliminating the nuclear and missile threat from Iran.

    The ceasefire came into effect after several waves of Iranian attacks on Israel, Iran’s Press TV reported earlier on Tuesday.

    The ceasefire was agreed by both sides after the Israeli military said it had intercepted Iranian missiles, without giving the exact time of the attack.

    “Some time ago, sirens sounded in several areas of Israel after identifying missiles launched from Iran towards the State of Israel,” the military said in a statement posted on Telegram at around 05:00 local time. Iran has since launched several waves of missiles at Israel, according to Iranian state media.

    D. Trump earlier said that a ceasefire between the two sides would begin at around 04:00 GMT, with Iran expected to cease its operations first.

    The Islamic Republic’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had earlier said there was no “agreement” between Iran and Israel on a ceasefire. However, he said Iran was prepared to stop further retaliatory actions if Israeli attacks were stopped by 04:00 Tehran time /00:30 GMT/.

    “If Israel stops its illegal aggression against the Iranian people no later than 4 a.m., Iran does not intend to continue retaliatory actions after that,” the Foreign Minister wrote on the X website, adding that Tehran will make a final decision on ending military operations later.

    The conflicting statements have left observers doubtful that a cease-fire has been implemented. As of Monday evening, neither Israel nor Iran had publicly confirmed any agreement. The White House and Pentagon have also made no official statements, and it remains unclear whether the announced truce had been discussed through diplomatic channels or whether the parties intend to adhere to its terms.

    On Monday evening, Trump announced on his social network Truth Social that Israel and Iran had reached a formal agreement on a full and complete ceasefire, marking the end of the “12-day war.” According to him, the ceasefire will initially last for 12 hours, during which the warring parties intend to maintain “peace and respect.”

    Calling the agreement a breakthrough that “could save the Middle East from years of destruction,” Trump concluded his statement with a call for unity. “God bless Israel, God bless Iran, God bless the Middle East, God bless the United States of America, and God bless the world,” he wrote. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Israel says new rockets fired from Iran after ceasefire

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    JERUSALEM/TEHRAN, June 24 (Xinhua) — Israel said on Tuesday it had detected missiles from Iran shortly after Israeli authorities said they had accepted U.S. President Donald Trump’s ceasefire offer.

    Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz has ordered the Israeli military to “respond decisively” following the rocket attack on Iran, local media reported.

    The escalation came shortly after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Tuesday that Israel had accepted US President Donald Trump’s ceasefire offer and achieved its goals in the operation against Iran.

    According to a statement from the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office, B. Netanyahu said Israel had achieved its goal of eliminating the nuclear and ballistic missile threat.

    US President Donald Trump earlier said a ceasefire between the two sides would begin at around 04:00 GMT, with Iran set to cease its operations first. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • Israel says Iran violates ceasefire announced by Trump, orders new strikes

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said on Tuesday he had ordered the military to strike Tehran in response to what he said were missiles fired by Iran in a violation of the ceasefire announced hours earlier by U.S. President Donald Trump.

    Iran denied violating the ceasefire. The armed forces general staff denied that there had been any launch of missiles towards Israel in recent hours, Iran’s Nour News reported.

    The developments raised early doubts about the ceasefire, intended to end 12 days of war.

    Katz said in a statement he had ordered the military to “continue high-intensity operations targeting regime assets and terror infrastructure in Tehran” in light of “Iran’s blatant violation of the ceasefire declared by the President of the United States.”

    Hours earlier, Trump had posted on Truth Social: “THE CEASEFIRE IS NOW IN EFFECT. PLEASE DO NOT VIOLATE IT!”

    Both Israel and Iran had confirmed the ceasefire after it was announced by Trump.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel had achieved the goals it had set in launching its June 13 surprise attack on Iran, to destroy its nuclear programme and missile capabilities.

    “Israel thanks President Trump and the United States for their support in defence and their participation in eliminating the Iranian nuclear threat,” Netanyahu had said.

    Iran says its nuclear programme is solely for peaceful purposes and denies seeking to develop nuclear weapons.

    Iran’s top security body, the Supreme National Security Council, said its military had forced Israel to “unilaterally accept defeat and accept a ceasefire”.

    Iran’s forces would “keep their hands on the trigger” to respond to “any act of aggression by the enemy”, it said.

    Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi had earlier said that Iran would halt its retaliatory strikes provided that Israel stopped attacking as of 4:00 a.m. in Tehran.

    Global stock markets surged and oil prices tumbled on Tuesday after the announcement of the ceasefire, in the hope it heralded a resolution of the war just two days after the United States joined it by hitting Iranian nuclear sites with huge bunker-busting bombs.

    (Reuters)

  • Heavy rain likely in several parts of Maharashtra, Gujarat, Konkan region: IMD

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Rainfall activity is expected to intensify over large parts of India in the coming days, with the India Meteorological Department (IMD) forecasting isolated heavy to very heavy showers over northwest India from June 25 onwards.

    Meanwhile, central, eastern, and northeastern India are likely to continue witnessing widespread rainfall through the week, with extremely heavy showers expected in parts of Konkan, central Maharashtra, and the Gujarat region on June 24.

    The southwest monsoon has further advanced into the remaining parts of the north Arabian Sea, more areas of West Uttar Pradesh, parts of Haryana, Chandigarh, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu, and sections of Punjab.

    The IMD has said that conditions remain favourable for the monsoon to cover additional parts of Rajasthan, Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, and the rest of West Uttar Pradesh within the next 36 hours.

    Extremely heavy rainfall, exceeding 20 cm in 24 hours, is likely at isolated locations over Konkan, Madhya Maharashtra, and the Gujarat region on June 24. Very heavy rainfall is also expected across Konkan and Goa, Madhya Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Northeast India from June 24 to 30.

    Other regions forecast to receive significant rain include Uttarakhand (June 24–27), East and West Rajasthan, Haryana, Punjab, Odisha, West Uttar Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Sub-Himalayan West Bengal, Sikkim, Bihar, Jharkhand, and both interior and coastal Karnataka during various intervals of the week.

    In Delhi-NCR, residents can expect some relief from the heat as the weather is set to remain cloudy with intermittent rain between June 24 and 27.

    On June 24, the sky will be partly cloudy with very light to light rain or thunderstorms accompanied by gusty winds up to 40 kmph. Maximum temperatures are expected to range between 35°C and 37°C, slightly below normal levels. Southeast winds will dominate, gradually picking up in the evening.

    From June 25 to 27, the capital is likely to experience generally cloudy skies with light to moderate rainfall, thunderstorms, and gusty winds. Maximum temperatures are expected to remain between 33°C and 35°C, and minimum temperatures between 26°C and 28°C, both slightly below the seasonal average. Winds will predominantly flow from the southeast and northeast directions, with speeds varying between 10 and 25 kmph.

  • MIL-OSI USA: DHS Releases Statement on Major Victory for Trump Administration and the American People on Deporting Criminal Illegal Aliens to Third Countries

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: DHS Releases Statement on Major Victory for Trump Administration and the American People on Deporting Criminal Illegal Aliens to Third Countries

    ASHINGTON – Today, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) secured a legal victory in its efforts to remove the worst-of-the-worst illegal aliens

    The U

    S

    Supreme Court issued a 6-3 order, staying a District Court’s order pending appeal with the U

    S

    Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

      
    With this decision, DHS can finally exercise its undisputed authority to deport criminal illegal aliens–who are not wanted in their home country–to third countries that have agreed to accept them

    This order comes after an activist judge caused Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and the eight barbaric criminals to be stranded in Djibouti

       
    Attributable to Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin:
    “The Supreme Court ruling is a victory for the safety and security of the American people

    The Biden Administration allowed millions of illegal aliens to flood our country, and now, the Trump Administration can exercise its undisputed authority to remove these criminal illegal aliens and clean up this national security nightmare

    “If these activist judges had their way, aliens who are so uniquely barbaric that their own countries won’t take them back, including convicted murderers, child rapists and drug traffickers, would walk free on American streets

    “DHS can now execute its lawful authority and remove illegal aliens to a country willing to accept them

    “Fire up the deportation planes

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Disaster Recovery Centers in Butler, Phelps Counties to Close

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Disaster Recovery Centers in Butler, Phelps Counties to Close

    Disaster Recovery Centers in Butler, Phelps Counties to Close

    The Disaster Recovery Centers (DRC) in Butler and Phelps counties are scheduled to close permanently

     The Butler County DRC will close Wednesday, June 25 at 7 p

    m

     The Butler County DRC is located at: MPC World Impact Center Conference Center727 Ridge Ave

    Poplar Bluff, MO 63901Hours of operation – Mon – Wed: 8 a

    m

    to 7 p

    m

    The Phelps County DRC will close Thursday, June 26 at 7 p

    m

    The Phelps County DRC is located at: Phelps County Courthouse Community Room200 N

    Main St

    Rolla, MO 65401Hours of operation – Mon – Thurs: 8 a

    m

    to 7 p

    m

     Help is still available online and by phone

    The fastest way to stay in touch with FEMA is online at DisasterAssistance

    gov

    You can also call 800-621-3362 or download the FEMA app

     The FEMA application deadline for the March 14-15 severe storms is July 22, 2025

    Apply online or by phone

    Homeowners and renters affected by the March 14-15 disaster in Bollinger, Butler, Camden, Carter, Franklin, Howell, Iron, Jefferson, Oregon, Ozark, Perry, Phelps, Reynolds, Ripley, St

    Louis, Wayne, Webster, and Wright counties may be eligible for FEMA assistance that includes rental assistance, lodging expenses reimbursement, home repair and other needs

    sara

    zuckerman
    Mon, 06/23/2025 – 19:04

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Ramzy Baroud: The fallout – winners and losers from the Israeli war on Iran

    COMMENTARY: By Ramzy Baroud, editor of The Palestinian Chronicle

    The conflict between Israel and Iran over the past 12 days has redefined the regional chessboard. Here is a look at their key takeaways:

    Israel:
    Pulled in the US: Israel successfully drew the United States into a direct military confrontation with Iran, setting a significant precedent for future direct (not just indirect) intervention.

    Boosted political capital: This move generated substantial political leverage, allowing Israel to frame US intervention as a major strategic success.

    Iran:
    Forged a new deterrence: Iran has firmly established a new equation of deterrence, emerging as a powerful regional force capable of directly challenging Israel, the US, and their Western allies.

    Demonstrated independence: Crucially, Iran achieved this without relying on its traditional regional allies, showcasing its self-reliance and strategic depth.

    Defeated regime change efforts: This confrontation effectively thwarted any perceived Israeli strategy aimed at regime change, solidifying the current Iranian government’s position.

    Achieved national unity: In the face of external pressure, Iran saw a notable surge in domestic unity, bridging the gap between reformers and conservatives in a new social and political contract.

    Asserted direct regional role: Iran has definitively cemented its status as a direct and undeniable player in the ongoing regional struggle against Israeli hegemony.

    Sent a global message: It delivered a strong message to non-Western global powers like China and Russia, proving itself a reliable regional force capable of challenging and reshaping the existing balance of power.

    Exposed regional dynamics: The events sharply exposed Arab and Muslim countries that openly or tacitly support the US-Israeli regional project of dominance, highlighting underlying regional alignments.

    Dr Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of The Last Earth: A Palestinian Story (Pluto Press, London). He has a PhD in Palestine Studies from the University of Exeter (2015) and was a Non-Resident Scholar at Orfalea Center for Global and International Studies, University of California Santa Barbara. This commentary is republished from his Facebook page.

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Ukraine: Civilians killed in indiscriminate strikes on Sumy city as Russian military increase attacks – new research

    Source: Amnesty International –

    • At least seven civilians killed and dozens injured in 3 June strike
    • Attacks using unguided Grad rockets must be investigated as war crimes
    • “Inherently inaccurate weapons must not be fired at areas densely populated with civilians” – Brian Castner

    Civilians in Sumy city in Ukraine are under increased unlawful attacks as the Russian military increase strikes in the region, Amnesty International said today.

    In Sumy city earlier this month, Russian forces fired unguided 122mm Grad rockets from a multiple rocket launch system (MRLS), killing at least seven civilians and injuring dozens more. These unguided munitions are inherently inaccurate and have wide area effects, and should therefore never be used in populated areas with civilians.

    Sumy city centre, approximately 40 kilometres from the border with Russia, is home to an estimated 200,000 people, the vast majority civilians who have continued living there during Russia’s war of aggression. In recent weeks, Russia has captured several settlements in the region. The Russian military now appears to be within artillery range of Sumy city as they attempt to capture further territory.

    Emergency services in the aftermath of the strike on Shevenchenko Avenue.

    “Our research has shown how Grad rockets have caused death and destruction across a wide area of Sumy city. These indiscriminate attacks must be investigated as war crimes,” said Brian Castner, Amnesty International’s Head of Crisis Research.

    “Russia’s continuing war of aggression has wreaked havoc on civilian life in Ukraine. Inherently inaccurate weapons must not be fired at areas densely populated with civilians.

    “As the Russian military appears to be increasing attacks on Sumy and elsewhere across Ukraine, we again call for international humanitarian law to be respected. Civilians are not targets.”

    Inherently inaccurate weapons must not be fired at areas densely populated with civilians.

    Brian Castner, Amnesty International’s Head of Crisis Research

    Amnesty International conducted remote interviews with nine people who witnessed strikes in Sumy on 3 June 2025. It also analyzed dozens of photos, videos and social media posts, including footage from the immediate aftermath of the strikes and photos of weapons fragments that confirmed the use of 122mm Grad rockets. Amnesty International visited five out of a reported seven impact locations to verify when and where a strike occurred.

    According to recent data from the UN’s Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, casualties from Russian attacks have increased significantly in Ukraine in recent months, particularly in regions closer to the front lines. According to Ukrainian authorities, the Russian military are carrying out between 80 to 120 shellings in Sumy Oblast per day.

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: MSF remains ready to resume medical activities in Libya

    Source: Médecins Sans Frontières –

    • MSF was forced to suspend activities in Libya on 27 March 2025 after the Internal Security Agency (ISA) of Libya closed our premises.
    • We are concerned for our former patients, including the migrants and refugees we were treating for tuberculosis.
    • We are willing to resume our activities in Libya should the safety of our staff and patients be guaranteed.

    Two and a half months after the forced suspension of our activities by the Libyan authorities, following a wave of repression that affected ten humanitarian organisations present in the west of the country, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) reaffirms our willingness to resume medical services and support to the Libyan authorities. We also remain concerned about the health of our former patients and the interruption of access to healthcare for people in Libya.

    On 27 March 2025, MSF was forced to suspend our medical activities in the country, following the closure of our premises by the Internal Security Agency (ISA) of Libya and the interrogation of several of our team members. All MSF staff were released, but after the crackdown, we were forced to evacuate our international employees from Libya and to terminate the contracts of our Libyan staff.

    Since mid-March, the ISA began summoning and interrogating the staff of international non-governmental organisations providing care to migrants and refugees in Libya.

    “MSF is ready to resume the medical projects that were underway for tuberculosis, mental health and maternal health, for any patient in need of care, and in collaboration with the relevant Libyan authorities,” says Steven Purbrick, MSF head of mission for Libya. “Provided that the safety of our staff and patients is guaranteed, MSF calls for its suspension to be lifted.”

    MSF had received no formal notification of the basis for the ISA actions and regrets this intimidatory crackdown which compromises access to medical care. We are deeply concerned with the consequences for patients’ health. We had treated migrants and refugees who are subjected to abuse and violence, with severe health consequences and acute medical needs. MSF’s referral mechanism to UNHCR or IOM to evacuate migrants and refugee patients identified as medical priority cases has now come to a halt.

    Before the suspension of activities, MSF was treating a cohort of more than 300 Libyan, migrant and refugee patients, mostly for tuberculosis, antenatal care and psychological support, especially for survivors of violence. Some patients were in a critical situation. MSF managed to refer most of them to other facilities, such as the National Center for Disease Control, but also lost contact with several of them.

    “Two of our tuberculosis patients died in Misrata immediately after our suspension. We hear that a further four other patients have since passed away in the same facility,” says Carla Peruzzo, medical coordinator for MSF in Libya. “We are very concerned about patients with chronic diseases like diabetic patients in need of insulin and people in need of dialysis, with kidney chronic disease.” 

    MSF was supporting the only public centre for tuberculosis patients in Libya. The tuberculosis unit was implemented by MSF within the Misrata Chest hospital in 2020.

    Medications destined for donation to public hospitals were locked inside MSF’s premises, which we will now be obliged to destroy due to the loss of temperature control.

    “The medical needs met by MSF are not always covered in Libya’s public health system, which faces structural challenges, such as understaffing and shortages of medication supply,” says Peruzzo. “A breakdown in tuberculosis treatment can lead to the development of a drug-resistant form of the disease, rapid deterioration in the patient’s state of health and even death.”

    Over the years MSF had successfully developed a technical collaboration with the National Tuberculosis Program to reinforce capacities to detect cases in specialised facilities, review national guidelines of the central laboratory in Tripoli and support the department of health education. We are ready to continue our planned support to the National Tuberculosis Program and the rest of our medical activities in Libya.

    MSF had been working in eastern and western Libya since 2011, providing essential healthcare, tuberculosis diagnosis and care, mental health support, and maternal health consultations.

    In 2023, MSF provided emergency medical support following the flooding in Derna, supporting two healthcare centres and providing medical consultations to almost 5,000 people. MSF also provided mental health services after the disaster.

    In 2024, MSF conducted over 15,000 medical consultations, 3,000 mental health consultations, and 2,000 consultations for tuberculosis.  

    MIL OSI NGO

  • NHAI launches monsoon preparedness drive to ensure smooth travel on national highways

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    With the onset of the monsoon season, the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) on Monday initiated a series of proactive measures to tackle waterlogging and ensure effective flood management across the country’s national highway network. In a concerted effort to enhance road safety and maintain uninterrupted travel, NHAI has launched a 15-day nationwide inspection and preparedness campaign.

    Under this drive, NHAI officials, contractors, and consultants are conducting inspections across vulnerable highway stretches to identify critical areas susceptible to waterlogging, landslides, or other monsoon-related disruptions. Special attention is being given to maintaining the free flow of water through key infrastructure elements such as bridges and culverts.

    As part of the preparedness plan, rainwater harvesting structures are being cleaned and desilted, while drains and outlets are being repaired to facilitate efficient drainage. Simultaneously, pothole repairs are underway on both main carriageways and slip roads, and efforts are being made to clear culverts, cross drains, and drainage systems, particularly in areas with a history of flooding. Reinforced Earth (RE) wall weep holes are also being cleaned to improve water discharge.

    To strengthen the emergency response framework, NHAI is deploying essential equipment and materials—including excavators, sandbags, and traffic signage—at flood-prone locations. The authority is also working in close coordination with executing agencies, local authorities, and district administrations to respond swiftly to early warnings of floods or landslides. Machinery and manpower are being mobilised quickly to mitigate risks in vulnerable areas.

    Round-the-clock Emergency Response Teams will be stationed at strategic points along the highways, equipped with the necessary tools to handle waterlogging and related incidents. Quick Response Teams have also been activated at NHAI field offices for real-time monitoring of critical sites.

    Leveraging technology, NHAI is enhancing its monitoring systems through AI-powered Intelligent Traffic Management Systems. Real-time weather and traffic updates will be made available to highway users via mobile alerts through the NHAI Rajmargyatra app and the IMD Meghdoot app. In addition, drones are being deployed to monitor road conditions, ensure proper slope maintenance, and detect pavement cracks for timely repair.

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Text adopted – Electricity grids: the backbone of the EU energy system – P10_TA(2025)0136 – Thursday, 19 June 2025 – Strasbourg

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Parliament,

    –  having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 194 thereof,

    –  having regard to the Commission communication of 8 July 2020 entitled ‘Powering a climate-neutral economy: An EU Strategy for Energy System Integration’ (COM(2020)0299),

    –  having regard to the Commission communication of 28 November 2023 entitled ‘Grids, the missing link – An EU Action Plan for Grids’ (COM(2023)0757),

    –  having regard to the Commission report of January 2025 entitled ‘Investment needs of European energy infrastructure to enable a decarbonised economy’(1),

    –  having regard to the Commission communication of 26 February 2025 entitled ‘Action Plan for Affordable Energy – Unlocking the true value of our Energy Union to secure affordable, efficient and clean energy for all Europeans’ (COM(2025)0079),

    –  having regard to the Commission communication of 26 February 2025 entitled ‘The Clean Industrial Deal: A joint roadmap for competitiveness and decarbonisation’ (COM(2025)0085),

    –  having regard to the Commission communication of 5 March 2025 entitled ‘Industrial Action Plan for the European automotive sector’ (COM(2025)0095),

    –  having regard to Regulation (EU) 2021/1153 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 July 2021 establishing the Connecting Europe Facility and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1316/2013 and (EU) No 283/2014(2) (the CEF Regulation),

    –  having regard to Regulation (EU) 2022/869 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2022 on guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure, amending Regulations (EC) No 715/2009, (EU) 2019/942 and (EU) 2019/943 and Directives 2009/73/EC and (EU) 2019/944, and repealing Regulation (EU) No 347/2013(3) (the TEN-E Regulation),

    –  having regard to Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU(4),

    –  having regard to Regulation (EU) 2019/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the internal market for electricity(5),

    –  having regard to Directive (EU) 2023/2413 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 amending Directive (EU) 2018/2001, Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 and Directive 98/70/EC as regards the promotion of energy from renewable sources, and repealing Council Directive (EU) 2015/652(6) (the Renewable Energy Directive),

    –  having regard to Directive (EU) 2024/1275 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 April 2024 on the energy performance of buildings(7),

    –  having regard to Directive (EU) 2024/1711 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 amending Directives (EU) 2018/2001 and (EU) 2019/944 as regards improving the Union’s electricity market design(8),

    –  having regard to Regulation (EU) 2024/1747 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 amending Regulations (EU) 2019/942 and (EU) 2019/943 as regards improving the Union’s electricity market design(9) (Electricity Market Design (EMD) Regulation),

    –  having regard to Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council(10), which reflects the EU’s electricity interconnection targets,

    –  having regard to the Council conclusions on ‘Advancing Sustainable Electricity Grid Infrastructure’, as approved by the Transport, Telecommunications and Energy Council at its meeting on 30 May 2024,

    –  having regard to its resolution of 10 July 2020 on a comprehensive European approach to energy storage(11),

    –  having regard to its resolution of 19 May 2021 on a European strategy for energy system integration(12),

    –  having regard to the report of January 2023 by the EU Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) on electricity transmission and distribution tariff methodologies in Europe,

    –  having regard to the report of 19 December 2023 by ACER entitled ‘Demand response and other distributed energy resources: what barriers are holding them back?’,

    –  having regard to the report of April 2025 by the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) entitled ‘Bidding Zone Review of the 2025 Target Year’(13),

    –  having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

    –  having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A10-0091/2025),

    A.  whereas electricity grids are essential for the Union to achieve its clean energy transition and to deliver renewable energy while supporting economic growth and prosperity; whereas inefficiencies and lack of full integration negatively impact energy prices for consumers and companies;

    B.  whereas in light of the growing demand for electricity, significant investments and upgrades are required, along with regulatory oversight, to increase cross-border and national-level transmission capacity and modernise infrastructure, ensuring a decarbonised, flexible, more decentralised, digitalised and resilient electricity system;

    C.  whereas poor connectivity and grid bottlenecks are among the main reasons the EU cannot fully benefit from the significant installed capacities of wind and solar energy, thereby ensuring affordable prices for households and industry; whereas the lack of strong interconnection between regions with different natural and climatic characteristics leads to the overproduction of energy and administrative limitation on renewable production in some regions, while other regions are struggling with insufficient supply and high prices;

    D.  whereas transmission system operators (TSOs) are essential for integrating offshore renewable energy into the EU grid, in particular for those connected to more than one market; whereas, if TSOs fail to provide the agreed grid capacity, compensation should be paid to developers for lost export capacity, funded by congestion income; whereas such compensation should be shared fairly among TSOs and align with principles of non-discrimination and maximising cross-border trade; whereas this highlights the importance of maintaining a functioning interconnector backbone, as failures in interconnector capacity may result in costs for both producers and TSOs;

    E.  whereas Europe will only reach its decarbonisation objectives if there is a coordinated, pan-European approach to electricity system planning, connecting borders, sectors and regions;

    F.  whereas the planning of electricity transmission and distribution networks must be coordinated to ensure the effective development of the EU electricity system;

    G.  whereas the EU electricity grid was built for a 20th century economy based on centralised, fossil fuel-fired electricity generation, and must be modernised to meet the demands of a digitalised economy with increased levels of electrification and a higher share of decentralised and variable renewable energy sources;

    H.  whereas cross-border interconnectors, transmission and distribution grid infrastructure are critical for integrating renewables, reducing costs for European consumers and increasing the security of energy supply;

    I.  whereas distribution level grid projects are already eligible for funds under the Connecting Europe Facility – Energy (CEF-E); whereas, however, only a small share has been allocated to distribution grids under the most recent Projects of Common Interest (PCI) list; whereas CEF-E should better reflect the role of distribution grids for the achievement of EU energy and climate targets;

    J.  whereas ENTSO-E has calculated that cross-border electricity investment of EUR 13 billion per year until 2050 would reduce system costs by EUR 23 billion per year;

    K.  whereas the ‘energy efficiency first’ principle is a fundamental principle of EU energy policy and is legally binding; notes that the correct implementation of this principle will significantly reduce energy consumption, thereby lowering the need for investment in electricity grids and interconnectors;

    L.  whereas keeping the EU energy policy triangle of sustainability, security of supply and affordability in balance is key to a successful energy transition and to a reliable European energy system;

    M.  whereas energy network planning is a long-term process closely linked to investment stability;

    N.  whereas energy system flexibility needs are expected to double by 2030, in light of an increased share of renewables; whereas demand-side flexibility is therefore crucial for grid stability; whereas individual citizens, businesses and communities participating in the electricity market may bring manifold benefits to the grids, such as enhanced system efficiency, resilience, investment optimisation, improved social acceptance and lower energy costs; whereas serious delays and inconsistencies in implementing existing EU provisions on citizens’ energy, demand flexibility and smart network operations remain a concern;

    O.  whereas although recycling meets between 40 % and 55 % of Europe’s aluminium and copper needs, further measures to extend recycling capacity, waste collection and supply chain efficiency must be considered;

    P.  whereas the Commission and High Representative’s joint communication entitled ‘EU Action Plan on Cable Security’ highlights the importance of ensuring the secure supply of spare cable parts and the stockpiling of essential material and equipment;

    Q.  whereas the electricity system blackout experienced in the Iberian Peninsula and parts of France on 28 April 2025 illustrated, among other things, how important it is to increase the energy grid’s resilience by ensuring that it is well maintained, protected and balanced at all times, including through flexible system services and enhanced cross-border interconnections, to allow for an agile recovery in the event of system failure;

    R.  whereas national and regional level system operators hold important responsibilities, particularly in the area of energy supply security; whereas all tasks of a regulatory nature should be performed by regulatory agencies acting in the public interest; whereas, however, alongside these responsibilities, a strengthened role for regulators and ACER in the planning processes can contribute to addressing shortcomings, such as ENTSO-E’s current 10-year network development plan (TYNDP) grid planning, as identified in the grid monitoring report; whereas, while acknowledging the TSOs’ responsibilities in drawing up these scenarios, ACER’s early involvement in the drawing-up process could help to ensure that the guidelines for the drawing-up of the scenarios are followed in accordance with the TEN-E Regulation;

    S.  whereas interconnection development will contribute to further integrating the EU electricity market, which not only increases system flexibility and resilience, but also unlocks economies of scale in renewable electricity production;

    T.  whereas the energy workforce will need to increase by 50 % to deploy the requisite renewable energy, grid and energy efficiency technologies(14);

    U.  whereas small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) are the backbone of the EU’s economy, entrepreneurship and innovation, comprising 99 % of businesses, providing jobs to more than 85 million EU citizens and generating more than 58 % of the EU’s GDP;

    V.  whereas increasing decentralised electricity generation and demand response are important to reduce reliance on centralised production, which may be easily targeted by physical threats or cyberthreats, or compromised by climate-related events;

    1.  Calls on the Member States to fully explore, optimise, modernise and expand their electricity grid capacity, including transmission and distribution; considers electricity grids to be the central element in the EU’s transition to a competitive, net zero economy by 2050, one that is capable of accommodating high volumes of variable renewable energy technologies and/or evolving demand sources driven by increased levels of electrification and the advancement of digital technologies; notes the Member States’ prerogative to determine their own energy mix;

    2.  Calls on the Commission, the Member States, ACER, EU DSO Entity(15) and ENTSO-E(16) to implement the actions of the EU grid action plan, the action plan for affordable energy, the reform of the EU’s electricity market design and the Renewable Energy Directive without delay;

    3.  Points out that the completion of the EU’s energy market integration will save up to EUR 40 billion annually, and that a 50 % increase in cross-border electricity trade could increase the EU’s annual GDP by 0,1 %(17);

    Relevance of electricity grids for the European energy transition

    4.  Welcomes the Commission’s communication on grids(18); underlines the expected increase in electricity consumption of 60 % by 2030, the rising need to integrate a large share of variable renewable power into the grid, and the need for grids to adapt to a more decentralised, digitalised and flexible electricity system, including the optimisation of system operations and the full utilisation of local flexibility resources, demand response and energy storage solutions to complement wholesale markets and enhance grid resilience, resulting in an additional 23 GW of cross-border capacity by 2025 and a further 64 GW of capacity by 2030; notes that over 40 % of the Union’s distribution grids are over 40 years old and need to be updated(19);

    5.  Reiterates that, by 2030, the Union needs to invest around EUR375 to 425 billion in distribution grids, and, overall, EUR 584 billion, in transmission and distribution electricity grids(20), including cross-border interconnectors and the adaptation of distribution grids to the energy transition;

    6.  Notes with concern that in 2023 the costs of managing transmission electricity grid congestion in the EU were EUR 4,2 billion(21) and continue to rise, and that curtailment is an obstacle to increasing the share of renewable energy sources; notes that this figure does not include the distribution electricity grid; stresses that in 2023 nearly 30 TWh of renewable electricity were curtailed across several Member States due to insufficient grid capacity; further notes the sharp increase in annual hours of negative electricity prices, rising from 154 in 2018 to 1 031 as of September 2024(22), largely driven by grid congestion at borders, and the lack of sufficient storage, flexibility and demand response in the electricity market to temporally match variable renewable electricity supply with electricity demand; stresses that addressing these issues could help to absorb surplus supply, thereby maximising the use of existing grid infrastructure, but that existing market and regulatory frameworks often fail to provide adequate incentives for achieving this;

    7.  Highlights that a failure to modernise and expand the EU’s electricity grid, alongside the rapid deployment of the high volumes of variable renewable energy required to deliver on its targets, has and will continue to result in high levels of dispatch-down (instructions to reduce output); believes that the dispatch-down of renewables, caused by grid congestion and curtailment, represents an unacceptable waste of high-value renewable electricity and money; calls on the Commission, as part of its forthcoming European Grids Package, to set out an EU strategy to vastly reduce the dispatch-down of renewable electricity;

    8.  Highlights the role of smart grids in improving congestion management and optimising the electricity distribution of renewables; stresses their contribution to network flexibility by integrating digital tools that facilitate demand-side response and collective self-consumption; underlines that better grid management enhances energy resilience, reduces curtailments and secures supply during peak demand periods;

    9.  Highlights that the electricity grid infrastructure is a priority for achieving the EU’s strategic autonomy and its climate and energy targets; notes the Clean Industrial Deal’s commitment to electrification with a key performance indicator of a 32 % economy-wide electrification rate by 2030, which would necessitate a significant and continuous update and deployment of grids; regrets that delays in responding to requests for connection to grids result in a slower pace of electrification, even in Member States where generation from renewables is rapidly increasing;

    10.  Highlights, in particular, the crucial role that energy communities can play in supporting local economies; regrets that energy communities and smaller operators face disproportionate barriers to grid access and grid funding access due to regulatory hurdles and resource constraints; calls, therefore, on the Member States that are lagging behind in this regard to fully implement the Clean Energy Package, Fit for 55 and Renewable Energy Directive provisions, empowering citizens, municipalities, SMEs and companies to actively participate in the electricity market, in particular by developing enabling frameworks for renewable energy communities and the promotion of energy-sharing schemes; calls for grid-related EU and national level funding to take into account the specific needs of projects promoted by energy communities;

    Regulatory situation and challenges

    11.  Is convinced that regulatory stability is a key condition for unlocking private investments in the electricity grid and, where feasible, enabling the affordable electrification of the EU’s economy, and reiterates the need to implement already adopted legislation before assessing potential new reviews;

    12.  Underlines that integrated grid planning across sectors at local, regional, national and EU levels will lead to increased system efficiency and reduced costs; calls, therefore, on the Commission and on the Member States to work towards integrated planning and to ensure that electricity network development plans are aligned with the 2021-2030 national energy and climate plans (NECPs) for all voltage levels; notes that a strengthened governance framework would help to ensure alignment between grid development plans and national and EU level policy objectives; recognises that, while the Member States are required to report on their contributions to EU targets through the NECPs, there is currently no equivalent obligation on TSOs to systematically report at EU level;

    13.  Underlines that the TEN-E Regulation and the Projects of Common Interest (PCI) and Projects of Mutual Interest (PMI) are powerful tools in the development of the Union’s cross-border energy infrastructure; regrets the shortcomings in the current TYNDP for European electricity infrastructure, which results in investment interests falling short of cross-border needs(23), and that grid planning does not fully leverage cross-border and cross-sectoral savings(24); further regrets delays regarding to the completion of PCIs; urges the Commission to introduce more coordinated, long-term cross-sectoral planning to deliver the related savings and benefits across the EU; highlights that such coordinated planning could better inform cost sharing of infrastructure across the Member States; notes that, although the TEN-E Regulation enables smart electricity grid projects with a cross-border impact to obtain PCI status, even if such projects do not cross a physical border, the PCI list in 2023 included only five such projects; strongly believes, therefore, that the PCI process needs to be strengthened, simplified and streamlined for more clarity and transparency; calls on the Member States to fully complete the PCIs; calls on the Commission to urgently propose a targeted revision of the TEN-E Regulation in order to (1) introduce a robust planning process that combines system operators’ responsibilities with a strengthened role for ACER by mandating ACER to request amendments to the scenarios and the TYNDP, (2) ensure scenarios are drawn up in line with the decarbonisation agenda and enable easier access for smart electricity grid projects, and (3) introduce a simplified application process for small and medium-sized distribution system operators (DSOs);

    14.  Emphasises that network planning is a long-term process closely linked to investment stability; proposes, therefore, extending the time frame for network development plans to 20 years; highlights that grid investment is urgently required by the EU’s competitive agenda and should not be delayed;

    15.  Additionally notes that the EU will continue to have strong electricity links with its neighbouring countries and therefore believes the Commission should enhance such cooperation with neighbouring countries through PMIs with non-EU countries, as provided for in the TEN-E Regulation;

    16.  Strongly emphasises that CEF-E has proven to be the crucial instrument for co-financing cross-border energy infrastructure and insists on its continuation; welcomes the inclusion of offshore electricity grid projects in the Commission’s most recent allocation of grants under CEF-E;

    17.  Considers the lack of detailed, reliable and comparable data on national and EU grid planning an obstacle to more efficient grids; calls therefore on the Member States to thoroughly implement the relevant provision in the Electricity Directive(25), in particular Article 32, and to encourage smaller DSOs to apply this Article’s provision;

    18.  Welcomes the EU DSO Entity’s report on good practices on Distribution Network Development Plans(26) (DNDPs), which calls on the Member States to include cost-benefit analyses in their DNDPs, in order to evaluate investment opportunities; urges the Commission to develop guidelines based on this report, in cooperation with the EU DSO Entity, to harmonise and increase transparency of national development planning for distribution grids, to publish a European overview of the DNDPs and to require all transmission and distribution operators to provide energy regulators with the necessary data about their current and future grid hosting capacity information and grid planning, to enable energy regulators to properly scrutinise grid planning; calls on the Member States to implement Article 31(3) of Directive 2024/1711, which requests grid operators to publish information on the capacity available in their area of operation, in order to ensure transparency and enable stakeholders to make informed investment decisions; calls on the Commission to develop a centralised online repository for all transmission plans and DNDPs;

    19.  Highlights the significant risk posed by curtailment to the viability of renewable energy investment, especially considering that many Member States fail to compensate market participants for curtailed electricity volumes, despite the requirements set out in Articles 12 and 13 of Regulation (EU) 2019/943; regrets the lack of transparency, availability and data granularity regarding curtailed renewable energy volumes and congestion management costs;

    20.  Highlights the value of putting clear metrics in place to measure whether the EU is on track to deliver the grid expansion and reinforcements needed to meet its 2050 objectives; notes that such metrics could include reductions in renewable energy curtailment, lower grid development costs relative to the amount of capacity delivered, increases in the efficient use of existing infrastructure, a reduction in losses and lower raw material intensity;

    21.  Notes the work done by ENTSO-E and the EU DSO Entity on harmonised definitions of available grid hosting capacity for system operators and to establish an Union-wide overview thereof; believes that national regulatory authorities (NRAs) could benefit from clear legislative provisions as to how Member States can prioritise grid connections, so as to abandon the ‘first-come, first-served’ principle; therefore asks the Commission to amend Article 6 of Directive (EU) 2019/944 on the internal market for electricity, as part of the implementation review that the Commission must complete by 31 December 2025, and to consequently introduce transparent priority connection criteria to be chosen and further defined by the Member States for (1) generation connection, such as quality and maturity of the project, level of commitment, contribution to decarbonisation, social value, and for (2) consumer connection, such as quality and maturity of the project, level of commitment, contribution to decarbonisation, public interest or its strategic and/or social value, and grid optimisation; calls on the NRAs and the Member States to provide clear prioritisation rules according to their local and national specificities to allow the ‘first-come, first-served’ approach to be abandoned by disincentivising applications for connection that are not substantiated by a solid project, that are speculative or where the developer cannot show sufficient commitment to the realisation of a project;

    22.  Underlines that improved cross-border interconnections offer substantial cost-saving potential at the system level, with annual reductions in generation costs estimated at EUR 9 billion up to 2040, while requiring annual investments of EUR 6 billion in cross-border infrastructure and storage capacity;

    23.  Regrets that some Member States did not achieve the 10% interconnection target by 2020 and urges them to strive to achieve the current 15% interconnection target for 2030, as set out in Regulation (EU) 2018/1999, since interconnection capacity is crucial for the functioning of the EU’s internal electricity market, leading to significant cost savings at system level and decreasing generation costs by EUR 9 billion annually to 2040(27); regrets that the 32 GW of cross-border capacity needed by 2030 remains unaddressed(28); deplores the delays and uncertainties regarding several interconnection projects; calls, therefore, on the Commission to propose, by June 2026 at the latest, a binding interconnection target for 2036 based on a needs assessment; stresses the need for cooperation with non-hosting Member States and for the EU and its neighbouring countries to be involved in negotiations, in order to ensure the projects’ finalisation;

    24.  Highlights the need to accelerate permitting procedures for electricity infrastructure; stresses that grid expansion should not be delayed by lengthy permitting procedures or excessive reporting requirements; therefore welcomes the positive progress made regarding provisions adopted in the latest revision of the Renewable Energy Directive, specifically Article 16f thereof, and the Emergency Regulation on Permitting(29) to accelerate, streamline and simplify permit-granting procedures for grid and renewable energy projects, especially the principle of public overriding interest for grid projects; notes, however, that some of the Member States have not seen a material improvement in project permitting timelines, despite the ambitious frameworks set out at EU level; therefore urges the Member States to implement these measures without delay and calls on the Commission to closely monitor the implementation of the Renewable Energy Directive, and regularly assess if revised permitting provisions are sufficient to deliver on the EU’s objectives; additionally calls on the Commission to set out guidelines for the Member States to include a principle of tacit approval in their national planning systems, as described in Article 16a of the Renewable Energy Directive; stresses that reinforcing administrative capacity, including through adequate staffing of planning and permitting authorities, will accelerate permitting procedures;

    25.  Encourages the Member States to draw up plans to designate dedicated infrastructure areas for grid projects, as outlined in Article 15e of the Renewable Energy Directive; stresses that such plans are essential to account for local specificities and ensure respect for protected areas; emphasises that these plans should be closely coordinated with the designation of acceleration areas for renewables, to ensure a streamlined, efficient and integrated approach to energy infrastructure development;

    26.  Notes that often documents need to be submitted in paper form; calls on the Member States to increase the digitalisation of these processes in order to accelerate permitting procedures; calls on the Commission and the Member States to revise all EU legislation relevant to permitting, such as the Environmental Impact Assessment Directive(30), with a view to introducing mandatory digital application, submission and processing requirements;

    27.  Highlights the importance of public acceptance and public engagement when developing new grid projects and calls on the Commission to develop a set of best practices to be shared among the Member States in this regard; highlights the critical importance of effective communication with citizens and communities regarding grid projects and reinforcement; notes that local-level support can help to accelerate the delivery of critical infrastructure and thus meet national and EU level objectives; urges the swift implementation of the EU’s pact for engagement with the electricity sector and coordination with national signatories (TSOs, DSOs, NRAs) to guarantee early, meaningful and regular public participation in grid projects;

    28.  Calls for the convening of a TAIEX(31) Group on Permitting within the forthcoming European Grids Package to support the Member States in addressing administrative bottlenecks, enhancing regulatory capacity and accelerating project approvals through the sharing of best practices and cross-border coordination;

    29.  Welcomes the initiatives announced under the Action Plan for Affordable Energy; recommends that the Commission extend the ‘tripartite contract for affordable energy for Europe’s industry’ to smaller energy producers, including energy communities, SMEs and businesses, leveraging flexibility and demand response, and link the outcome of these cooperation structures with grid planning processes at national and EU level, in order to optimise planning, investment and grid utilisation from the outset;

    30.  Highlights the need for improvements to be made to the public procurement framework, in order to tackle the challenges to grid operators regarding supply chains; therefore welcomes the Commission communication on the Clean Industrial Deal and the announcement by the Commission of a forthcoming review of the Public Procurement Directives(32); stresses public procurement’s potential for the continued development of a strong EU manufacturing supply chain for electricity grid equipment, software and services; encourages the Commission to promote resilience, sustainability and security in public procurement procedures for grid operators; advocates for greater consistency between EU regulations on public procurement; calls on the Commission to adapt EU rules on public procurement with a view to harmonising and simplifying functional tendering specifications, in order to ramp up the production capacities of grid components;

    31.  Believes that adequate standardisation and common technical specifications are necessary for achieving economies of scale, and to speed up technological development; considers, additionally, that it is essential to ensure the right level of standardisation so that manufacturers’ capacity to innovate is not reduced;

    32.  Reiterates the need to consider new business models between equipment manufacturers and operators, such as long-term framework agreements that encourage the shift from one-off ‘grid projects’ to sustained and structured ‘grid programmes’, which result in more predictable planning for grid technology manufacturers; calls for the streamlining of tendering processes for the provision of grid equipment and services;

    33.  Stresses that this forthcoming revision of the Public Procurement Directives will allow the inclusion of sustainability, resilience and European preference criteria in EU public procurement processes for strategic sectors, in line with the provisions set out in Article 25 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1735(33); calls for grids and related technologies to be explicitly recognised as strategic sectors, to ensure their eligibility under the revised framework; underlines that strengthening European preference in public procurement processes is essential for reducing the EU’s dependence on non-EU suppliers, enhancing supply chain security, and fostering a resilient EU industrial base capable of supporting the energy transition; welcomes the introduction by the European Investment Bank (EIB) of a ‘Grids Manufacturing Package’ to support the European supply chain with at least EUR 1,5 billion in counter-guarantees for grid component manufacturers; calls for further similar financial instruments to be developed to provide long-term investment certainty and to accelerate the scaling-up of European production capacity;

    Financing

    34.  Notes that over the past five years, global investment in power capacity has increased by nearly 40 %, while investment in grid infrastructure has lagged behind; notes that estimates of investment that the EU will need to make in its grid over the 2025-2050 period range from EUR 1 950 billion to EUR 2 600 billion(34);

    35.  Observes with concern that the budget allocated under CEF-E has been insufficient to expedite all PCI and PMI categories; notes that with a EUR 5,84 billion budget for 2021-2027, the programme has restricted capacity and may struggle to keep pace with investment needs; calls on the Commission and the Member States to significantly increase the CEF-E envelope and the percentage of CEF-E funds dedicated to electricity infrastructure as a separate adequate resource, when proposing the next multiannual financial framework (MFF), and to ensure that projects both at the distribution and at the transmission levels with an EU added value are eligible for budget allocated under CEF-E; encourages the Commission to further explore co-financing possibilities between CEF-E and the Renewable Energy Financing Mechanism;

    36.  States that EU funding is predominantly allocated to transmission grids with relatively insignificant allocations to distribution grids, despite their significant role in the EU energy transition, demonstrated by the fact that, between 2014 and 2020, CEF-E funded around EUR 5,3 billion worth of projects, of which around EUR 1,7 billion went to transmission grids and EUR 237 million to smart distribution grids; notes that the last PCI list only contained five smart electricity projects;

    37.  Deeply regrets that, whereas regional funds such as the Cohesion Fund, the European Regional Development Fund or the Recovery and Resilience Facility provide for grid investments in principle, in practice they are underutilised for grid projects; regrets also that the evaluation criteria applied to the assessment of projects submitted in response to the EU Innovation Fund’s calls for proposals prevent funding for the demonstration and manufacturing of grid technologies; calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that a proportionate amount of such funding is also spent on grid investment;

    38.  Calls on the Member States to simplify access to the EU funds managed by the Member States for grid operators, for instance through the establishment of a one-stop-shop in those Member States in which a large share of DSOs are of a small or medium size;

    39.  Calls on the Commission to propose a dedicated funding instrument, such as one based on revenues from the market-based emission reduction scheme, to allow the Member States to support decentralised and innovative grid projects with a clear EU added value, including smaller projects, ensuring its effective use by the Member States for these purposes;

    40.  Emphasises the need for regulatory frameworks to attract private investment and ensure cost-reflective tariffs, in addition to public funding mechanisms;

    41.  Is convinced that anticipatory investments and forward-looking investments will help to address grid bottlenecks and prevent curtailment; points out that the EMD Regulation sets out regulatory elements for anticipatory investments but lacks a harmonised definition and implementation across the Union; calls on the Member States to swiftly implement the aforementioned provisions of the EMD Regulation and remove national legal barriers, on NRAs to remove barriers as regards regulatory incentives and disincentives, and on the Commission to urgently provide guidance regarding the approval of anticipatory investments, as announced in its Action Plan for Grids(35); believes that further harmonisation in this respect might be beneficial; calls for detailed cost-benefit analyses and scenario-based planning to assess the likelihood of future utilisation, and recommends a two-step approval process for projects with a higher risk level by first approving smaller budgets for studies or planning, followed by a second approval for the more costly steps, in order to reduce the risk of stranded assets;

    42.  Acknowledges that grid investments from capital markets can be incentivised by providing market-oriented conditions, such as suitable rates of return and a robust regulatory framework; emphasises that the EU and the Member States should encourage private investments by providing risk mitigation tools or Member State guarantees; calls on the Commission and the EIB to further strengthen financing and de-risking initiatives and tools, such as counter-guarantees, to support additional electricity grid expansion and modernisation at affordable rates for system operators; emphasises the relevance of ensuring that the EU’s electricity grid is financed and therefore owned by public and private capital only from EU actors, or previously screened non-EU investors, in view of the criticality of the infrastructure;

    43.  Underlines that, while investment decisions should be guided by efficiencies, including energy and cost efficiency, investments should not only be focused on capital expenditure, and that investments optimising, renewing and modernising the existing infrastructure should be equally considered; therefore welcomes Article 18 of the EMD Regulation, which calls for tariff methodologies to give equal consideration to capital and operational expenditure, and remunerate operators to increase efficiencies in the operation and development of their networks, including through energy efficiency, flexibility and digitalisation; calls on the Commission and the Member States to thoroughly implement its provisions and to focus on ensuring fair and timely compensation to system operators for the costs borne by them;

    44.  Notes that the electrification of the EU economy, where technically and economically feasible, would help to drive down network tariffs by spreading the costs across a wider range of users; highlights, therefore, the importance of ensuring that the development of the future network is fully aligned with demand projections driven by increases in the level of electrification; is concerned by experts’ forecasts of network tariff increases of around 50% to 100% by 2050(36); stresses, therefore, the need for instruments and incentives that support grid operators in efficiently managing available grid capacity, including through procuring flexibility services, with a view to reducing imminent grid investment needs; highlights that flexible connection agreements, flexible network tariffs and local flexibility markets contribute to grid efficiency; invites NRAs to promote these flexible tariffs that allow consumers to easily react to price signals while shielding vulnerable households and businesses from price peaks; calls on the Commission and the Member States to actively address bottlenecks in tariffs, connection fees and regulations to facilitate cross-border and offshore hybrid grid investment;

    45.  Calls on the Member States to implement the relevant EU legal framework to unlock demand-side flexibility by accelerating the deployment of smart meters, enabling access to data from all metering devices and ensuring efficient price signals, to allow industries and households to optimise their consumption and reduce their electricity bills, and at the same time help reduce operational costs and the need for additional grid investment;

    46.  Stresses that the relaxation of network tariffs and certain charges, which could have the effect of lowering electricity prices, as proposed in the Affordable Energy Action Plan, has to be accompanied by a plan to replace the sources of the funds needed for grid investment with alternatives, in order to avoid facing underinvestment of the grids in the future;

    47.  Highlights the importance of minimising the additional costs on consumers’ bills resulting from the investments required to deliver the grid modernisation and expansion needed to meet the EU’s climate and competitiveness goals; asks the Commission to work with the Member States to develop a coordinated set of best practices for investments and equitable network tariff composition, with a strong emphasis on increasing transparency and removing non-energy related charges from the tariffs;

    48.  Points out that transmission infrastructure and availability of cross-zonal capacities are vital for an integrated market and for the exchange of low-marginal cost renewable energies, while respecting system security; notes that the EMD Regulation sets a minimum 70 % target of capacities available for cross-zonal trade by 2025 but Member States are far from reaching it; therefore urges the Member States and their TSOs to speed up their efforts to maximise cross-zonal trading opportunities, to ensure an efficient internal electricity market, appropriate investment decisions and renewable energy integration; regrets that achieving this target has often resulted in re-dispatch costs; notes that existing cost sharing mechanisms, such as cross-border cost allocation (CBCA), inter-transmission system operator (TSO) compensation and re-dispatching cost sharing, are limited and difficult to implement, which does not encourage cross-border investments, such as in offshore grids; calls on the Commission to holistically review and improve these mechanisms to ensure that they reflect the shared benefits of infrastructure and address the diversity of electricity flows, whether internal or cross-border, including a fair and balanced cost-benefit sharing mechanism for cross-border infrastructure projects that is based on objective criteria;

    49.  Takes note of the report of April 2025 by ENTSO-E on potential alternative bidding zone configurations based on location marginal pricing simulations provided by TSOs;

    Grid-enhancing technologies, digitalisation, innovative solutions and resilience

    50.  Underlines that grid-enhancing technologies, digital solutions, ancillary services and data management technologies, as well as smart energy appliances, often leveraging artificial intelligence, can significantly increase the efficiency of existing grid capacities and maximise the use of existing assets, reducing the requirement for new infrastructure, for instance by providing real-time information on energy flows; therefore insists that these technologies and innovative solutions must be explored; urges NRAs to incentivise TSOs and DSOs to rely more on such technologies, weighing up the costs and benefits of their use versus grid expansion and by using remuneration schemes based on benefits rather than costs, and to benchmark the TSOs and DSOs on their uptake of such technologies; invites the Commission to further promote such innovative technologies when assessing projects that apply for EU funding;

    51.  Welcomes the work accomplished by ENTSO-E and the EU DSO Entity in developing the TSO/DSO Technopedia(37) so far, and calls on the Commission to mandate the biannual updating of the Technopedia to accurately reflect the technology readiness levels (TRLs) of technologies included;

    52.  Urges the Commission and the Member States to further enable and increase the digitalisation of the European electricity system, enabling the optimisation of the operation of its power system and reducing pressure on the supply chain; underlines that data sharing and data interoperability are essential for grid planning and optimisation; encourages the Member States, the NRAs, the EU DSO Entity and ACER to continue to accelerate their work on the monitoring system based on indicators measuring the performance of smart grids (‘smart grid indicators’), as set out in the Electricity Directive;

    53.  Stresses the urgent need to enhance the security of critical electricity infrastructure, including interconnectors and subsea cables at risk of sabotage, and increase its resilience to extreme weather events, climate change and physical and digital attacks; highlights the need to strengthen cooperation at national, regional and EU levels;

    54.  Stresses the growing risk of coordinated cyberattacks targeting the EU’s entire electricity network; recalls the importance of the rapid implementation of cybersecurity and other related network codes and the related legislation, such as the NIS 2 Directive(38) and the Cybersecurity Act(39), and encourages the Commission to correct, in upcoming legislative reviews, the status of physical grid equipment, including remotely controllable grid equipment, such as inverters, which is currently not held to a high enough cybersecurity standard, especially in cases where the manufacturer is required, under the jurisdiction of a non-EU country, to report information on software or hardware vulnerabilities to the authorities of that non-EU country; calls for enhanced EU level cooperation between all parties to strengthen preparedness and resilience; considers that NRAs should acknowledge the costs incurred by operators in adopting cybersecurity and resilience measures, and provide incentives for investments pertaining to increasing the resilience of the energy infrastructure to cyberthreats, and physical and hybrid threats, including climate adaptation measures;

    55.  Underlines the need to step up efforts to protect existing and future critical undersea and onshore energy infrastructure; considers that the EU should play a broader role in preventing incidents that threaten this infrastructure, in promoting surveillance and in restoring any damaged infrastructure using state of the art technologies; calls on the Commission and the Member States to find solutions to increase the protection and resilience of critical infrastructure, including solutions to financing such measures and technologies;

    56.  Recognises that new high-voltage electricity grid projects provide a multifunctional and cost-efficient opportunity to integrate additional security measures (i.e. sensors, sonar, etc.) and environmental solutions (i.e. bird deflectors, fire detectors, nature corridors, etc.) if planned in a holistic manner; asks the Commission to develop guidelines for NRAs to ensure that initial grid project planning is carried out and financed with these elements in mind;

    57.  Urges the Commission, DSOs and TSOs to develop an EU-owned Common European Energy Data Space, based on technical expertise and practice utilising the available data(40) and based on a common set of rules ensuring the secure, transparent portability and interoperability of energy data, where harmonised data is safely managed, exchanged and stored in the EU; stresses that this Common European Energy Data Space should facilitate data pooling and sharing through appropriate governance structures and data sharing services, supporting critical energy operations including transmission and distribution; underlines that European TSOs, DSOs and other previously screened electricity grid actors must be able to securely and smartly operate the grid, optimising its use by integrating flexibility and innovative technologies, in line with key principles of interoperability, trust, data value and governance; notes that data exchange arrangements must also take into account interactions with non-EU parties;

    58.  Recognises the potential of flexibility as a necessary tool for optimising system operations, maintaining the stability of the system and empowering consumers by incentivising them to shift their consumption patterns; stresses the importance of implementing appropriate measures to guarantee efficient price signals that incentivise flexibility, including from all end-consumers, and ensuring that all resources contribute to system security, including by accelerating the deployment of smart meters, smart energy-efficient buildings, and enabling access to data from all metering devices; asks NRAs to recognise flexibility innovations and pilot projects in the system, insofar as these do not negatively impact the grid’s overall balance and stability, in order to continue incentivising innovation;

    59.  Calls on NRAs to work closely with TSOs and DSOs to assess the flexibility potential, and needs of the national systems in current and future planning, taking into consideration the presence of industry, large consumers, large generators and storage; highlights in particular the critical role that storage assets, including long-duration electricity storage, capable of providing up to 100 hours of electricity, can play in providing congestion management services to the grid; notes that in order to provide these essential system services, investors in storage assets require stable, long-term revenue models, similar to the way in which support schemes have successfully provided revenue certainty for renewable generation assets;

    Supply chain, raw materials and the need for skills

    60.  Notes with concern that global growth in the demand for grid technologies has put pressure on supply chains and the availability of cables, transformers, components and critical technologies; highlights the findings in the February 2025 International Energy Agency report, ‘Building the Future Transmission Grid’(41), that it now takes two to three years to procure cables and up to four years to secure large power transformers, and that average lead times for cables and large power transformers have almost doubled since 2021;

    61.  Is concerned about the long lead times for many grid technology components and remains determined to maintain European technology leadership in grid technology, emphasising the need for innovation to develop, demonstrate and scale European high-capacity grid technologies and innovative grid-enhancing technologies;

    62.  Stresses that critical and strategic raw materials are essential for grid infrastructure, with aluminium and copper demand set to rise by 33 % and 35 % respectively by 2050(42); takes note of the Commission decision recognising certain critical raw materials projects as strategic projects under the Critical Raw Materials Act(43), in order to secure access to these key materials and diversify sources of supply; calls on the Commission and the Member States to enhance recycling, and support strategic partnerships and trade agreements to this end;

    63.  Highlights the need to strengthen grid supply chains to increase the supply of grid technologies at affordable costs, and thereby limit the costs borne by consumers via network charges; calls for a strategic approach to acquiring energy technologies, components or critical materials related to grids, in order to avoid developing dependencies on single suppliers outside of the EU;

    64.  Believes that holistic, coordinated, long-term grid planning across the entire European energy system is needed to solve the supply chain capacity bottleneck, and that such planning provides manufacturers with essential transparency and predictability for adequately planning manufacturing capacity increases; considers that such planning must be reliable and enable new business models, such as long-term framework agreements and capacity reservation contracts;

    65.  Urges the maximum standardisation of key electricity grid equipment, insofar as is technically possible, via a joint technical assessment by the Commission, DSOs, TSOs and industry, covering all voltage levels in order to scale up production, lower prices and delivery times, and promote the interoperability of systems;

    66.  Stresses the urgent need to address labour shortages in the energy sector; notes that the Commission has projected that the energy workforce needs to significantly increase in order to deploy renewable energies, upgrade and expand grids, and manufacture energy efficiency, grid and other relevant technologies; regrets the shortages of electrical mechanics and fitters reported in 15 of the Member States, increasing the staffing needs of DSOs and TSOs; highlights that the energy workforce must grow by 50 % by 2030 to support the deployment of renewables(44), grid expansion and energy efficiency, with an estimated 2 million additional jobs required in electricity distribution by 2050; calls for training, upskilling and reskilling initiatives, prioritising grid-related skills to close skills gaps; welcomes university-business partnerships and targeted EU skills academies for strategic sectors, including grids; encourages DSOs and TSOs to diversify their workforce, including by increasing women’s participation;

    67.  Reiterates that the Member States and the EU should cooperate to adapt the relevant skills programmes and develop best practices to fulfil the growing skills demand across all educational levels, with a strong emphasis on encouraging gender balance in the sector;

    68.  Highlights the crucial role of SMEs and EU businesses in supplying the technology sector for the electricity grid; points out the need to access affordable electrification, limiting the costs related to the supply chain and ensuring a skilled workforce;

    Offshore

    69.  Acknowledges the strategic relevance of offshore development in delivering the EU’s objectives of energy autonomy, increased use of renewable energy, a resilient and cost-effective electricity system and climate neutrality by 2050; stresses the importance of fully utilising the potential of Europe’s five sea basins for offshore energy generation; highlights the particular significance of the North Seas (covering the geographical area of the North Seas, including the Irish and Celtic Seas), which offer favourable conditions and the highest potential, with an agreed target of 300 GW of installed offshore generation capacity by 2050 within the framework of the North Seas Energy Cooperation; welcomes the progress made in this regard; emphasises the need to develop a meshed offshore grid, including hybrid interconnectors, particularly in the North Seas, to fully harness offshore potential and improve electricity market integration; calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen regional cooperation on grid planning and energy cooperation across all sea basins with the EU’s neighbouring countries, in particular the UK and Norway, specifically in offshore wind energy development and the planning and manufacturing of electricity grids;

    70.  Highlights the need for a stable and predictable regulatory framework that ensures the most optimal trading arrangements to provide the required investor confidence to support the development and interconnection of offshore grid and offshore wind projects, ensuring market efficiency and efficient cross-border flows, including with non-EU countries; underlines the necessity of strengthening national grids where required to maximise the benefits of offshore energy; acknowledges that combining offshore transmission with generation assets (offshore hybrids) will be an integral part of an efficient network system, as this comes with several advantages for the European energy system but still lacks the right regulatory framework to incentivise necessary investment;

    Cooperation with non-EU countries

    71.  Calls on the Member States to increase cooperation and coordination with like-minded non-EU countries such as Norway and the UK; recalls that the development of electricity infrastructure to harness the offshore wind potential of the North Seas is a shared priority for both the EU and the UK;

    72.  Highlights the need for a pragmatic and cooperative approach to EU-UK electricity trading; calls on the Commission to work closely with the UK administration to agree on a mutually beneficial trading arrangement that strengthens security of supply and the pathway to net zero for both jurisdictions; additionally, believes that efficiencies of trading arrangements can be improved further; calls on the Commission to engage with its UK counterparts constructively on this matter;

    Outermost regions

    73.  Stresses the unique challenges faced by the EU’s outermost regions and other areas not connected to the European electricity grid; highlights their reliance on imports and high vulnerability to electricity blackouts and extreme climate hazards; notes the importance of developing resilient and autonomous energy systems through local grid development and cleaner energy production; calls on the Commission to address these regions’ specific needs in the European Grids Package and to propose additional financial support to improve the autonomy of their energy systems, and address their lack of interconnection and absence of broader grid connection benefits;

    o
    o   o

    74.  Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.

    (1) European Commission: Directorate-General for Energy, Artelys, LBST, Trinomics, Finesso, A. et al., Investment needs of European energy infrastructure to enable a decarbonised economy – Final report, Publications Office of the European Union, 2025.
    (2) OJ L 249, 14.7.2021, p. 38, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2021/1153/oj.
    (3) OJ L 152, 3.6.2022, p. 45, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/869/oj.
    (4) OJ L 158, 14.6.2019, p. 125, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/944/oj.
    (5) OJ L 158, 14.6.2019, p. 54, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/943/oj.
    (6) OJ L, 2023/2413, 31.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/2413/oj.
    (7) OJ L, 2024/1275, 8.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1275/oj.
    (8) OJ L, 2024/1711, 26.6.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2024/1711/oj.
    (9) OJ L, 2024/1747, 26.6.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1747/oj.
    (10) OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2018/1999/oj.
    (11) OJ C 371, 15.9.2021, p. 58.
    (12) OJ C 15, 12.1.2022, p. 45.
    (13) European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E), ‘Bidding Zone Review of the 2025 Target Year’, April 2025, https://eepublicdownloads.blob.core.windows.net/public-cdn-container/clean-documents/Network%20codes%20documents/NC%20CACM/BZR/2025/Bidding_Zone_Review_of_the_2025_Target_Year.pdf.
    (14) Commission communication of 5 March 2025 entitled ‘The Union of Skills’ (COM(2025)0090).
    (15) The EU DSO Entity is a technical expert body and association of distribution system operators (DSOs) mandated by the Electricity Market Regulation (2019/943/EU) to promote the functioning of the electricity market and to facilitate the energy transition.
    (16) The European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) is the association for the cooperation of European transmission system operators (TSOs).
    (17) International Monetary Fund (IMF), IMF Staff Background Note on EU Energy Market Integration, 16 January 2025, as included in the Council background note of 17 January 2025 on EU energy market integration: https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-5438-2025-INIT/en/pdf.
    (18) Commission communication of 28 November 2023 entitled ‘Grids, the missing link – An EU Action Plan for Grids’ (COM(2023)0757).
    (19) ibid.
    (20) ibid.
    (21) ACER 2024 Market Monitoring Report, ‘Transmission capacities for cross-zonal trade of electricity and congestion management in the EU’, 3 July 2024.
    (22) ACER 2024 Market Monitoring Report, ‘Key developments in EU electricity wholesale markets’, 20 March 2024.
    (23) ACER 2024 Monitoring Report, ‘Electricity Infrastructure development to support a competitive and sustainable energy system’, 16 December 2024, p. 17.
    (24) ibid.
    (25) Directive (EU) 2019/944 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on common rules for the internal market for electricity and amending Directive 2012/27/EU (OJ L 158, 14.6.2019, p. 125, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/944/oj).
    (26) EU DSO Entity, ‘DSO Entity’s identified good practices on Distribution Network Development Plans’, 1 July 2024.
    (27) ACER 2024 Monitoring Report, ‘Electricity Infrastructure development to support a competitive and sustainable energy system’, 16 December 2024.
    (28) Commission communication of 28 November 2023 entitled ‘Grids, the missing link – An EU Action Plan for Grids’ (COM(2023)0757).
    (29) Council Regulation (EU) 2022/2577 of 22 December 2022 laying down a framework to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy (OJ L 335, 29.12.2022, p. 36, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2577/oj).
    (30) Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 26, 28.1.2012, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/92/oj).
    (31) TAIEX is the Technical Assistance and Information Exchange instrument of the Commission. It supports public administrations with regard to the transposition, implementation and enforcement of EU legislation as well as facilitating the sharing of EU best practices.
    (32) Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ L 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/24/oj).
    (33) Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on establishing a framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology manufacturing ecosystem and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (OJ L, 2024/1735, 28.6.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1735/oj).
    (34) ACER 2024 Monitoring Report, ‘Electricity Infrastructure development to support a competitive and sustainable energy system’, 16 December 2024, p. 30.
    (35) Commission communication of 28 November 2023 entitled ‘Grids, the missing link – An EU Action Plan for Grids’ (COM(2023)0757).
    (36) ACER 2024 Monitoring Report, ‘Electricity Infrastructure development to support a competitive and sustainable energy system’, op. cit.
    (37) EU DSO Entity, ‘Implementation of Action 7 in the EU Action Plan for Grids: DSO/TSO Technopedia, ENTSO-E & DSO Entity’, 18 December 2024.
    (38) Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on measures for a high common level of cybersecurity across the Union, amending Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2018/1972, and repealing Directive (EU) 2016/1148 (NIS 2 Directive) (OJ L 333, 27.12.2022, p. 80, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2555/oj).
    (39) Regulation (EU) 2019/881 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on ENISA (the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity) and on information and communications technology cybersecurity certification and repealing Regulation (EU) No 526/2013 (Cybersecurity Act) (OJ L 151, 7.6.2019, p. 15, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2019/881/oj).
    (40) European Commission: Directorate-General for Energy, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI, Guidehouse, McKinsey & Company, TNO, Trinomics, Utrecht University, Berkhout, V., Villeviere, C., Bergsträßer, J., Klobasa, M., Regeczi, D., Dognini, A., Singh, M., Stornebrink, M., Hülsewig, T., Seigeot, V., Lenzmann, F.Breitschopf, B., Common European Energy Data Space, Publications Office of the European Union, 2023.
    (41) International Energy Agency, ‘Building the Future Transmission Grid – Strategies to navigate supply chain challenges’, February 2025, https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/a688d0f5-a100-447f-91a1-50b7b0d8eaa1/BuildingtheFutureTransmissionGrid.pdf.
    (42) KU Leuven, Eurometaux, ‘Study quantifies metal supplies needed to reach EU’s climate neutrality goal’, 25 April 2022, https://www.eurometaux.eu/media/hxdhepyp/press-release-study-quantifies-metal-supplies-needed-to-reach-eu-s-climate-neutrality-goal.pdf.
    (43) Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020 (OJ L, 2024/1252, 3.5.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1252/oj).
    (44) Commission communication of 5 March 2025 entitled ‘The Union of Skills’ (COM(2025)0090).

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UKEF unveils new strategic financing for industrial growth

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    UKEF unveils new strategic financing for industrial growth

    Up to £13 billion of direct lending will be used to help boost British exports across key industrial sectors as part of new growth measures spearheaded by UK Export Finance (UKEF).

    • Multi-billion-pound direct lending by UK Export Finance will help boost orders for British exporters across key industrial sectors, including defence

    • Export credit agency to introduce new product to secure critical minerals supply and plans to legislate to increase its statutory commitment limit to support even more businesses

    • New measures announced as part of Industrial Strategy published yesterday

    Through its Direct Lending Facility, UKEF – the government’s export credit agency – provides loans to overseas buyers, allowing them to finance the purchase of capital goods and services from UK suppliers.

    Outlined in the Industrial Strategy, UKEF now has greater flexibility of direct lending powers to support all eight Industrial Strategy sectors, from clean industries and life sciences to advanced manufacturing and defence.

    The £13 billion marks a £3 billion uplift in UKEF’s facility. Of this £13 billion, at least £3 billion will be used to stimulate defence exports, demonstrating the growing importance of this sector to economic and national security.

    Recent direct lending deals include a £18.8 million equivalent loan for an Angolan clean water project delivering up to approximately £6.8 million of supply contracts for British exporters, and a £23 million equivalent loan to Iraq’s Ministry of Interior to purchase 62 UK-made fire-fighting vehicles.

    Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds said:

    UKEF plays an instrumental role in delivering our Industrial Strategy – providing the essential support that British businesses need to compete internationally.  

    By unlocking export opportunities and supporting innovation across key sectors through mechanisms like direct lending, UKEF is helping to drive sustainable economic growth, create highly skilled jobs and strengthen Britain’s place as a go-to trading partner.  

    Our commitment to backing British exporters forms a vital part of this government’s Plan for Change which will raise living standards in every part of UK.

    Following on from the announcement of UKEF’s Critical Minerals Supply Finance product in the Autumn Statement, the department is going further to secure industry access to critical minerals by launching a new loan guarantee scheme for UK-based suppliers that sell critical minerals, or products that contain critical minerals, to UK exporters.  

    UKEF also plans to legislate to have its statutory commitment limit – the entire amount of support that the department can have on its books at any one time – increased which will enable it to support more businesses of all sizes across the UK. The department will review its operating mandate to consider taking on a broader trade and investment finance remit.

    To encourage growth at a local level, the department plans to expand its network of 24 local export finance managers to give focus on city regions and clusters where key sectors have a presence. Export finance managers provide free and impartial guidance to businesses on their export finance needs.

    UK Export Finance CEO Tim Reid added:

    UKEF is well positioned to drive exports across high-impact industry sectors and create economic growth. We look forward to playing a key role in driving delivery of the Industrial Strategy, using our increased capacity and flexible product range.

    Backed by our comprehensive five-year business plan that will reach businesses of all sizes across every region and nation of the UK, we’re laying the extra foundations to enable thousands more British businesses to take their products and services to global markets.

    The measures are announced ahead of UKEF’s 2024/25 annual report & accounts which will be published shortly. The results are expected to show it was a record-breaking year for the department.

    It will build on the results of the 2023/24 financial year in which UKEF provided over £8.8 billion of support to 650 businesses of all sizes and types, supported up to 41,000 jobs in communities around the whole UK and the contribution of up to £3.3 billion to the overall economy.

    Contact 

    Media enquiries:

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: David Mitchell convicted for covering road with potatoes and silt

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    David Mitchell convicted for covering road with potatoes and silt

    Huge loss of soil from potato field costs farmer over £40,000 for polluting river, with potatoes and silt escaping into the road.

    The run-off soil was ankle deep and caused severe issues on the road.

    • Potato and silt mudslide polluted nearby watercourse and shut local roads.
    • David Mitchell, an experienced farmer, was fully aware of his obligations to reduce risk to the local environment.
    • Fines, costs and compensation for this incident totalled over £40,000.

    A Taunton potato farmer has been prosecuted by the Environment Agency for causing silt, soil and potatoes to escape from a field and seriously pollute a tributary of the River Tone in Somerset.

    The judge found that the pollution was so significant in that it would take a winter of normal water flow to wash the sediment away. 

    David Mitchell, of Hillcommon in Taunton, Somerset appeared before Taunton Magistrates Court on 18 June 2025. Mr Mitchell pleaded guilty to an offence of causing silt laden water from a field under his control at Combe Florey to enter a stream on two occasions in August and again on September 2022.

    He was given full credit for his guilty plea by the District Judge and fines and compensation were ordered to be paid within 12 months. He was ordered to pay a total of £9,078 in fines and costs based on his means as disclosed to the court. The court heard that other clean up, equipment purchases and compensation to the landowner, already paid by Mr Mitchell, have totalled over £35,000.

    River hit hard by run-off sediment

    On 7 September 2022, an Environment Agency officer identified a sediment pollution to the Back Stream watercourse in Combe Florey. A considerable length of the bed of the watercourse was found to be covered, bank to bank, in a thick layer of sediment. The investigating officer traced the pollution to a large field close to the railway bridge in Combe Florey where soil had run off the field down onto the A358 and into the Back Stream.

    The field had been rented that year by Mitchell to grow potatoes, which had not yet been harvested when the pollution occurred. Thunderstorms and wet weather conditions resulted in the loss of an estimated 50-100 tonnes of soil from the field.

    Large numbers of potatoes could be seen in the watercourse and along the edge of the roadside, along with the significant quantities of silt and mud. The busy A358 had to be closed on two occasions for the Highways Agency to clear drains and remove tonnes of soil from the road. 

    The soil deposited under the railway bridge was so deep it prevented vehicles from being able to use the A358. Mr Mitchell agreed to pay compensation of £1,128.10 to a motorist for their losses as a result of this incident.

    A considerable length of the Back Stream watercourse’s river bed in Combe Florey was covered, bank to bank, in a thick layer of sediment.

    Road closed by similar incident month earlier

    The Environment Agency investigations revealed that there had also been an earlier incident in August 2022 which had also closed the A358. Following the initial incident in August, Mitchell, an experienced potato grower, was provided with silt fencing along with guidance and advice paid for by the Somerset Rivers Authority. Only a small section of fencing was used and this was not installed according to the guidance given by advisors.

    A small number of hay bales and a soil bund had also been installed at the bottom of the field in an attempt to prevent further soil from leaving the field. It was also established that the potatoes had mainly been planted up and down the sloping field which significantly increased the risk of soil erosion and run off.

    David Womack, of the Environment Agency, said:

    David Mitchell had control and custody of the land he rented up until the point of harvest and was therefore responsible for the land management practices.

    He chose to grow a high-risk crop on a sloping field with light soils. As an experienced potato farmer he should have identified the risks of using this field and taken reasonable steps to prevent large scale soil loss.

    No formal risk assessment and no adequate precautions to prevent soil loss had been taken. This made it highly likely that soil erosion and environmental damage would occur in even moderate rainfall conditions.

    The Environment Agency expects that all farmers need to be aware of their legal responsibilities to prevent pollution events like this from happening. Farmers renting their fields for the growing of high risk vegetables should ask prospective tenants what they intend to grow and ask to see their risk assessments and soil management plans to ensure they don’t also potentially become liable for such incidents.

    Guidance for farmers is available: The Reduction and Prevention of Agricultural Diffuse Pollution (England) Regulations 2018

    Background

    David Mitchell was charged with the following offences:

    • On or before 7 September 2022 David Mitchell did knowingly cause or permit an unpermitted water discharge activity, namely the discharge of poisonous, noxious or polluting matter, namely silt laden water from a field under his control at Combe Florey, Somerset into inland fresh waters, namely Back Stream.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-Evening Report: Iran and Israel agree to a fragile ceasefire. One factor could be crucial to it sticking

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ali Mamouri, Research Fellow, Middle East Studies, Deakin University

    Amir Levy/Getty Images

    After 12 days of war, US President Donald Trump has announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that would bring to an end the most dramatic, direct conflict between the two nations in decades.

    Israel and Iran both agreed to adhere to the ceasefire, though they said they would respond with force to any breach.

    If the ceasefire holds – a big if – the key question will be whether this signals the start of lasting peace, or merely a brief pause before renewed conflict.

    As contemporary war studies show, peace tends to endure under one of two conditions: either the total defeat of one side, or the establishment of mutual deterrence. This means both parties refrain from aggression because the expected costs of retaliation far outweigh any potential gains.

    What did each side gain?

    The war marked a turning point for Israel in its decades-long confrontation with Iran. For the first time, Israel successfully brought a prolonged battle to Iranian soil, shifting the conflict from confrontations with Iranian-backed proxy militant groups to direct strikes on Iran itself.

    This was made possible largely due to Israel’s success over the past two years in weakening Iran’s regional proxy network, particularly Hezbollah in Lebanon and Shiite militias in Syria.

    Over the past two weeks, Israel has inflicted significant damage on Iran’s military and scientific elite, killing several high-ranking commanders and nuclear scientists. The civilian toll was also high.

    Additionally, Israel achieved a major strategic objective by pulling the United States directly into the conflict. In coordination with Israel, the US launched strikes on three of Iran’s primary nuclear facilities: Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.

    Despite these gains, Israel did not accomplish all of its stated goals. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had voiced support for regime change, urging Iranians to rise up against Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s government, but the senior leadership in Iran remains intact.

    Additionally, Israel did not fully eliminate Iran’s missile program, as Iran continued striking to the last minute before the ceasefire. And Tehran did not acquiesce to Trump’s pre-war demand to end uranium enrichment.

    Although Iran was caught off-guard by Israel’s attacks — particularly as it was engaged in nuclear negotiations with the US — it responded by launching hundreds of missiles towards Israel.

    While many were intercepted, a significant number penetrated Israeli air defences, causing widespread destruction in major cities, dozens of fatalities and hundreds of injuries.

    Iran demonstrated its capacity to strike back, though Israel succeeded in destroying many of its air defence systems, some ballistic missile assets (including missile launchers) and multiple energy facilities.

    Since the beginning of the assault, Iranian officials have repeatedly called for a halt to resume negotiations. Under intense pressure, Iran realised it would not benefit from a prolonged war of attrition with Israel — especially as both nations faced mounting costs and the risk of depleting their military stockpiles if the war continued.

    As theories of victory suggest, success in war is defined not only by the damage inflicted, but by achieving core strategic goals and weakening the enemy’s will and capacity to resist.

    While Israel claims to have achieved the bulk of its objectives, the extent of the damage to Iran’s nuclear program is not fully known, nor is its capacity to continue enriching uranium.

    Both sides could remain locked in a volatile standoff over Iran’s nuclear program, with the conflict potentially reigniting whenever either side perceives a strategic opportunity.

    Sticking point over Iran’s nuclear program

    Iran faces even greater challenges as it emerges from the war. With a heavy toll on its leadership and nuclear infrastructure, Tehran will likely prioritise rebuilding its deterrence capability.

    That includes acquiring new advanced air defence systems — potentially from China — and restoring key components of its missile and nuclear programs. (Some experts say Iran did not use some of its most powerful missiles to maintain this deterrence.)

    Iranian officials have claimed they safeguarded more than 400 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium before the attacks. This stockpile could theoretically be converted into nine to ten nuclear warheads if further enriched to 90%.

    Trump declared Iran’s nuclear capacity had been “totally obliterated”, whereas Rafael Grossi, the United Nations’ nuclear watchdog chief, said damage to Iran’s facilities was “very significant”.

    However, analysts have argued Iran will still have a depth of technical knowledge accumulated over decades. Depending on the extent of the damage to its underground facilities, Iran could be capable of restoring and even accelerating its program in a relatively short time frame.

    And the chances of reviving negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program appear slimmer than ever.

    What might future deterrence look like?

    The war has fundamentally reshaped how both Iran and Israel perceive deterrence — and how they plan to secure it going forward.

    For Iran, the conflict reinforced the belief that its survival is at stake. With regime change openly discussed during the war, Iran’s leaders appear more convinced than ever that true deterrence requires two key pillars: nuclear weapons capability, and deeper strategic alignment with China and Russia.

    As a result, Iran is expected to move rapidly to restore and advance its nuclear program, potentially moving towards actual weaponisation — a step it had long avoided, officially.

    At the same time, Tehran is likely to accelerate military and economic cooperation with Beijing and Moscow to hedge against isolation. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi emphasised this close engagement with Russia during a visit to Moscow this week, particularly on nuclear matters.

    Israel, meanwhile, sees deterrence as requiring constant vigilance and a credible threat of overwhelming retaliation. In the absence of diplomatic breakthroughs, Israel may adopt a policy of immediate preemptive strikes on Iranian facilities or leadership figures if it detects any new escalation — particularly related to Iran’s nuclear program.

    In this context, the current ceasefire appears fragile. Without comprehensive negotiations that address the core issues — namely, Iran’s nuclear capabilities — the pause in hostilities may prove temporary.

    Mutual deterrence may prevent a more protracted war for now, but the balance remains precarious and could collapse with little warning.

    Ali Mamouri does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Iran and Israel agree to a fragile ceasefire. One factor could be crucial to it sticking – https://theconversation.com/iran-and-israel-agree-to-a-fragile-ceasefire-one-factor-could-be-crucial-to-it-sticking-259669

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz