NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Pandemic

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Address to the Canberra Business Chamber and Institute of Public Accountants online budget breakfast

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    It’s terrific to be with you and I’m sorry we’re not meeting in person in the Great Hall today. I acknowledge that I’m on Ngunnawal land today, and acknowledge all First Nations people joining us.

    Thank you to the Canberra Business Chamber and the Institute of Public Accountants for again putting on this event, which is really a fixture in the budget calendar. I’ve done your event many times. I enjoy it more in person than virtually, but it is a real pleasure to be able to engage with the Canberra business community.

    Let me start off with where we are in a global context, then go to a couple of the key measures in the Budget and finally finish up by asking the question: ‘What does the Budget mean for Canberra?’

    If we look around the world, uncertainty is up. We’ve always lived in an uncertain world, but policy uncertainty is combining with geopolitical uncertainty. At this moment, we’ve seen a range of our counterpart economies go into recession as they’ve sought to battle inflation. The UK and New Zealand have suffered recessions, and many other economies around the world have experienced quarters of negative growth as they sought to tame the global cost‑of‑living challenge. Australia, uniquely in our history, has managed to bring inflation down into the Reserve Bank’s target band without a significant rise in unemployment. We should be collectively extraordinarily proud of this. It’s not the story of the 70s, the 80s or the 90s, where taming inflation meant increasing unemployment.

    In Australia, we’ve managed to maintain full employment while getting prices back under control. And that in itself is a remarkable achievement. More than a million jobs created, interest rates now coming down, inflation back within the band, a strong labour market. So, while you look around the world and see a lot of uncertainty, there’s not many places you’d rather be than Australia.

    The Treasurer last night talked about 5 big themes. I don’t have half an hour, so let me focus on 2: cost of living and productivity. In terms of cost of living, our biggest measure is continuing the tax cuts that we began last year. Last year as you remember, we adjusted the tax cuts so every taxpayer got a tax cut. Now we’re announcing that from 2026–27, we’ll be delivering a tax cut worth $268 for everyone earning over $45,000 per year, and the same again the year after that. That will be worth about $10 a week for the average worker, and it adds to the previous tax cut worth about $40 a week for the average worker to around $50 a week. That sits alongside the energy bill relief which will be extended for another half year, reflecting the pressure many households are under.

    And then there’s the systemic changes: cheaper medicines, cheaper childcare. The work we’re doing in supermarket competition has a cost‑of‑living lens as well. We’ve commissioned the biggest review of the supermarkets in 17 years, and that review continues to make recommendations which build on the government’s work to tackle shrinkflation and ensure that Australian shoppers get a better deal at the checkout. You’ll soon be seeing the next iteration of CHOICE’s quarterly gross price grocery price monitoring, which is another measure that Labor has put in place to ensure that shoppers get a better deal.

    Now, Emma [Alberici] talked about productivity and about a couple of the productivity boosting measures we have in place. I want to focus on those because it is really important that we as progressives, are focused on not only boosting demand, but also on the supply side, on ensuring that we’re unlocking the growth potential of the Australian economy. Emma rightly talked about the work that we’ve done on early learning, providing that 3 day guarantee, following the experts and getting rid of the activity test in order to unlock the productivity potential of the Australian workforce. We’re investing in skills, finally completing that Gonski project of ensuring that every school gets its appropriate level of funding, and that final agreement with the Queensland Premier that was announced this week is the last piece of the puzzle in those Gonski reforms. It’s not just money, it’s about reforms. It’s about more targeted teaching, more intensive literacy and numeracy education to tackle that challenge that we’ve seen in the OECD PISA tests, where Australian students since the beginning of the millennium have slipped back about a year of achievement. We need to do better, and this money will allow us to do that.

    The boost in Free TAFE places is vital in ensuring that we have more skills for the jobs in the modern economy, particularly in construction. We understand that we need to increase uptake and we need to encourage apprentices to stay in on the tools. We recognise that by boosting investment in modular methods of construction, we can also unlock productivity in the housing sector. Housing sector productivity has gone down in Australia, as it has in many other advanced countries, and a recent Productivity Commission report talked about some of the challenges. They’re not bagging unions – far from it. They’re talking about the challenges of scale and about the way in which modular construction has sometimes struggled, about some of the regulatory challenges that housing construction faces, and our government is very focused on unlocking housing sector productivity.

    Now, Emma also talked about one of our key productivity boosting measures in this Budget, which is around the competition reforms relating to non‑competes. When I first started looking at this about 5 years ago, people said ‘Oh, it’s just an American thing. Sure, one in 5 American workers have non‑competes but you won’t find the same in Australia.’ So, we worked with e61 and with the ABS in order to do surveys that revealed, lo and behold, that one in 5 Australian workers were subject to a non‑compete clause – a clause that stopped them from moving to a better job. And then the argument came ‘It’s just executives being put on gardening leave’. But it turned out in the surveys that it’s gardeners, it’s early childhood workers, security guards, a whole range of workers in low‑wage professions that have been caught by standard form employment agreements which are preventing them from moving to a better job.

    Our reform will then unlock a productivity boost, because if you want to start a firm on a full‑employment economy, you need to hire workers from other firms. It’ll apply to workers earning under $175,000 – the Fair Work Act high‑income threshold. Our estimate, the estimates we have from the experts on this suggests that it will boost wages by around $2,500 per year. That means for those affected workers, those one in 5 – that’s a boost of around $50 a week, commensurate with the tax cut gains that I talked about.

    Getting rid of non‑compete laws for low wage workers shouldn’t trouble businesses, because you can still put in place non‑disclosure agreements that ensure that your secrets can’t walk out. And in fact, what’s going on at the moment is that many of these non‑compete clauses are not legally enforceable. We’re tying up workers and firms in a thicket of legal regulations. By getting rid of non‑competes and encouraging firms to instead use targeted non‑disclosure agreements, we will unlock productivity.

    Finally, for Canberra this Budget builds on the investments of past budgets. On our record investment in the national cultural institutions. Investment in the War Memorial and the National Security precinct. This Albanese Labor government hasn’t neglected Canberra’s infrastructure spend, as the previous government did in their final budget, when Canberra received just one‑fifth of our fair share of infrastructure investment from the Coalition. Instead, this Albanese government has invested in bike paths, roads, and light rail for the nation’s capital.

    We’ve got a public service which is right sized for the needs of the nation, and the Coalition’s proposals for a public service cut would devastate the ACT. On one hand, they’re saying that they’re going to cut one in 5 public servants which suggests that frontline services such as people processing veterans’ claims or parental leave benefits would suffer. But then they try and say, ‘well we won’t hurt frontline services – we’ll only cut the Canberra public service’. If they rip 41,000 public service jobs out, and only in Canberra – that’s half the public service in Canberra. That would also devastate the nation’s capacity to deal with future pandemics, with national security risks, and with biosecurity challenges. The Coalition can’t have it both ways. Either their public service cuts are a threat to frontline services, or they will devastate the nation’s policy infrastructure, including our national security.

    So, thanks for the chance to talk about Budget 2025. Jim Chalmers and Katy Gallagher have put together a fantastic Budget which invests in productivity, tackles the cost of living, and delivers for Australia.

    MIL OSI News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Support for Aussie tourism businesses

    Source: Australian Attorney General’s Agencies

    To help Australian tourism operators tap into the rapidly growing Filipino and Thai visitor markets, the Albanese Government is launching two new training programs.

    Delivered in partnership with the Australian Tourism Export Council, the Philippines Host and Thailand Host programs will equip Australian tourism businesses with the knowledge, cultural insights, and skills needed to deliver an unforgettable experience for inbound travellers.

    Travel from these markets has rebounded post-pandemic, with visitors from the Philippines reaching 171,900, and visitors from Thailand reaching 95,100 in 2024.

    But there is great potential to grow both markets further, with Tourism Research Australia forecasting that by 2029, annual visitors from the Philippines will increase by 42% and annual visitors from Thailand to increase by 47%.

    Airlines are expanding routes to meet this increasing demand, with Qantas adding Brisbane-Manila flights (100,000+ seats annually), Cebu Pacific increasing Sydney and Melbourne services, and Jetstar boosting Australia-Thailand routes to 22 weekly flights, including new Brisbane and Perth connections.

    The Albanese Government is helping tourism operators tap into new markets, recognising the opportunity it presents as highlighted in our Invested: Australia’s Southeast Asia Economic Strategy to 2040.

    The Host programs will be delivered by the Australian Tourism Export Council (ATEC), which also delivers the Tourism Training Hub, and the recently released Vietnam Host program.

    Australian tourism operators can register for the Philippines and Thailand Host Programs via the ATEC Tourism Training Hub.

    Quotes attributable to Minister for Trade and Tourism, Senator the Hon Don Farrell:

    “These new Programs will help deepen Australia’s engagement in Southeast Asia by preparing our tourism industry to attract and service visitors, and drive growth from the Philippines and Thailand.

    “New aviation services are helping increase travel between Australia and the Philippines and Thailand, which presents a wealth of opportunities for Australian businesses.

    “We want to ensure that our fantastic tourism operators are ready to take advantage of these opportunities, growing their businesses and creating jobs.”

    Quotes attributable to Mr Peter Shelley, Managing Director, Australian Tourism Export Council:

    “With the Philippines and Thailand emerging as key growth markets, now is the time for operators to invest in market readiness.

    “These new Host programs equip businesses with the knowledge and cultural insights to create meaningful visitor experiences and capitalise on these expanding opportunities.

    “Developed in collaboration with industry experts and Austrade, these Host programs provide tourism businesses with market-specific understanding that translates into the real-world.”

    Quotes attributable to Australian tourism industry representative, Tina Chaisuwan-Baker, Sales Manager – South East Asia, SeaLink Marine & Tourism: 

    “Undertaking ATEC’s Vietnam Host online course gave me key insights into the cultural preferences and service expectations of Vietnamese tourists coming into Australia. 

    “This knowledge has been essential in enhancing my approach to selling and tailoring our products, ensuring we meet the unique needs of the Vietnamese market.”

    MIL OSI News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: RI Delegation Blasts Trump Admin’s Claw Back of Public Health Funding

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed

    WASHINGTON, DC – As the Trump Administration announces that it will claw back $11.4 billion in previously awarded federal funding to state and local health departments, the Rhode Island congressional delegation is teaming up to say that the Trump Administration’s short-sighted approach to public health is leaving local communities more susceptible to preventable outbreaks of dangerous diseases, like measles.

    The federal funding being targeting for recoupment by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) include investments that have significantly strengthened local preparedness for public health emergencies, made it easier for people to get safe and effective vaccinations, and supported community health workers on the frontlines of keeping their neighbors safe and healthy.  Additionally, portions of the $11.4 billion being pulled back across the nation were being used to address health disparities in high-risk and vulnerable populations, like seniors and low-income families who were most affected by the pandemic.

    In Rhode Island, the CDC has cancelled four grants totaling over $30 million that support the state’s post-pandemic initiatives. Despite the CDC’s claim that these funds were being pulled back because the pandemic ended, the claw backs come at a time when lessons learned from the pandemic can be critical in helping states better respond to future public health emergencies.

    Much of the funding being pulled back by the Trump Administration had to be expended within the next six months. In many cases, the undisbursed federal funding was being used to help communities address public health issues beyond COVID and strengthen successful programs that helped save lives and kept communities informed and healthy.

    “Penny-wise and pound-foolish sums up this latest Trump move. Clearly the Trump Administration has learned no lessons from their botched COVID-19 response during President Trump’s first term nor their current mismanagement of measles outbreaks across the nation.  The programs being targeted were critical in helping states respond to and recover from the pandemic and helped to create new public health infrastructure that will be critical to responding to future public health emergencies,” said Senator Reed. “By failing state and local public health departments and allowing us to lapse in our preparedness for future emergencies, the Trump Administration’s CDC claw back is a sure-fire way to ensure we get caught flat-footed for future pandemics.”

    “Our delegation supports preparedness and response capacity to keep Rhode Islanders safe from public health threats.  This claw back is not helpful to Rhode Island’s medical community,” said Senator Whitehouse.

    “Federal public health funding helps keep Rhode Islanders safe, supports frontline health workers, and strengthens Rhode Island’s ability to respond to future health emergencies,” said Representative Seth Magaziner. “It’s outrageous that the Trump Administration is clawing back these vital resources. We should be expanding access to public health—not gutting programs like these to pay for tax breaks to benefit the wealthy.”

    “As the old saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. By stealing funding dedicated to bolster Rhode Island’s public health infrastructure, the Trump administration is leaving our community less prepared and less safe for future emergencies,” said Congressman Gabe Amo. “I join my delegation colleagues in demanding the immediate restoration of critical funds. This decision leaves our state and local health departments without the tools and resources necessary to keep Rhode Islanders healthy and safe.”

    Although the COVID-19 pandemic has ended, the disease is still claiming hundreds of lives across the nation each week. The public health emergency declared for COVID ended on May 11, 2023.  Additionally, researchers across the nation are still working to better understand and treat long COVID.

    The delegation also emphasized that Trump’s CDC claw back of federal public health funding comes as over 300 cases of the dangerously contagious measles virus have been reported in 15 states, including Rhode Island.  As the Trump Administration targets federal public health agencies for mass-firings and scientific censorship, disease surveillance is being weakened, research is being halted, irresponsible vaccine skepticism is being touted by top Trump public health officials, and preventable diseases are spreading across America.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Adjusts Imports of Automobiles and Automobile Parts into the United States

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    COUNTERING TRADE PRACTICES THAT THREATEN TO IMPAIR U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY: Today, President Donald J. Trump signed a proclamation invoking Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to impose a 25% tariff on imports of automobiles and certain automobile parts, addressing a critical threat to U.S. national security.
    President Trump is taking action to protect America’s automobile industry, which is vital to national security and has been undermined by excessive imports threatening America’s domestic industrial base and supply chains.
    The 25% tariff will be applied to imported passenger vehicles (sedans, SUVs, crossovers, minivans, cargo vans) and light trucks, as well as key automobile parts (engines, transmissions, powertrain parts, and electrical components), with processes to expand tariffs on additional parts if necessary.
    Importers of automobiles under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement will be given the opportunity to certify their U.S. content and systems will be implemented such that the 25% tariff will only apply to the value of their non-U.S. content.
    USMCA-compliant automobile parts will remain tariff-free until the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), establishes a process to apply tariffs to their non-U.S. content.

    The President is exercising his authority under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 to adjust imports to protect our national security.
    This statute provides the President with authority to adjust imports being brought into the United States in quantities or under circumstances that threaten to impair national security.

    MAINTAINING A RESILIENT DOMESTIC INDUSTRIAL BASE: President Trump is taking action to end unfair trade practices that jeopardize U.S. national security.
    The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical vulnerabilities and choke points in global supply chains, undermining our ability to maintain a resilient domestic industrial base.
    Legislation, pre-existing trade agreements like the USMCA, revisions to the U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement, and subsequent negotiations have not sufficiently mitigated the threat to national security posed by imports of automobiles and certain automobile parts.
    These new tariffs aim to ensure the U.S. can sustain its domestic industrial base and meet national security needs. 
    STRENGTHENING AMERICA’S MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY: President Trump’s decision to implement tariffs on imports of automobiles and automobile parts will protect and strengthen the U.S. automotive sector.
    Foreign automobile industries, bolstered by unfair subsidies and aggressive industrial policies, have expanded, while U.S. production has stagnated.
    In 1985, American-owned facilities in the United States manufactured 11.0 million automobiles, representing 97% of overall domestic (American- and foreign-owned) production of automobiles.
    In 2024, Americans bought approximately 16 million cars, SUVs, and light trucks, and 50% of these vehicles were imports (8 million).
    Of the other 8 million vehicles assembled in America and not imported, the average domestic content is conservatively estimated at only 50% and is likely closer to 40%.
    Therefore, of the 16 million cars bought by Americans, only 25% of the vehicle content can be categorized as Made in America.

    The United States trade deficit in automobile parts reached $93.5 billion in 2024.
    Currently, the U.S. automobile and automobile parts industry (American-owned and foreign-owned firms) employs approximately one million U.S. workers.
    Employment in automotive parts manufacturing totaled approximately 553,300 jobs in 2024, a decline of 286,000 jobs or 34% since 2000.
    In 2023, Research and Development (R&D) by American-owned automobile manufacturers amounted to only 16% of global R&D spending. R&D by American-owned firms lagged behind the EU, which controlled 53% of global R&D.
    TARIFFS WORK: Studies have repeatedly shown that tariffs can be an effective tool for reducing or eliminating threats to impair U.S. national security and achieving economic and strategic objectives.
    A 2024 study on the effects of President Trump’s tariffs in his first term found that they “strengthened the U.S. economy” and “led to significant reshoring” in industries like manufacturing and steel production.
    A 2023 report by the U.S. International Trade Commission that analyzed the effects of Section 232 and 301 tariffs on more than $300 billion of U.S. imports found that the tariffs reduced imports from China and effectively stimulated more U.S. production of the tariffed goods, with very minor effects on prices.
    According to the Economic Policy Institute, the tariffs implemented by President Trump during his first term “clearly show[ed] no correlation with inflation” and only had a temporary effect on overall price levels.
    An analysis from the Atlantic Council found that “tariffs would create new incentives for US consumers to buy US-made products.”
    Former Biden Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen affirmed last year that tariffs do not raise prices: “I don’t believe that American consumers will see any meaningful increase in the prices that they face.”
    A 2024 economic analysis found that a global tariff of 10% would grow the economy by $728 billion, create 2.8 million jobs, and increase real household incomes by 5.7%.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Adjusting Imports of Automobiles and Autombile Parts Into the United States

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    class=”has-text-align-center”>BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    A PROCLAMATION
    1.  On February 17, 2019, the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) transmitted to me a report on his investigation into the effects of imports of passenger vehicles (sedans, sport utility vehicles, crossover utility vehicles, minivans, and cargo vans) and light trucks (collectively, automobiles) and certain automobile parts (engines and engine parts, transmissions and powertrain parts, and electrical components) (collectively, automobile parts) on the national security of the United States under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1862) (section 232).  Based on the facts considered in that investigation, the Secretary found and advised me of his opinion that automobiles and certain automobile parts are being imported into the United States in such quantities and under such circumstances as to threaten to impair the national security of the United States. 
    2.  In Proclamation 9888 of May 17, 2019 (Adjusting Imports of Automobiles and Automobile Parts Into the United States), I concurred with the Secretary’s finding in the February 17, 2019, report that automobiles and certain automobile parts are being imported into the United States in such quantities and under such circumstances as to threaten to impair the national security of the United States.  I also directed the United States Trade Representative (Trade Representative), in consultation with other executive branch officials, to pursue negotiation of agreements to address the threatened impairment of the national security of the United States with respect to imported automobiles and certain automobile parts from the European Union, Japan, and any other country the Trade Representative deems appropriate.
    3.  The Trade Representative’s negotiations did not lead to any agreements of the type contemplated by section 232.
    4.  In Proclamation 9888, I also directed the Secretary to monitor imports of automobiles and certain automobile parts and inform me of any circumstances that, in the Secretary’s opinion, might indicate the need for further action under section 232 with respect to such imports.
    5. The Secretary has informed me that, since the February 17, 2019, report, the national security concerns remain and have escalated.  The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical vulnerabilities and choke points in global supply chains, undermining our ability to maintain a resilient domestic industrial base.  In recent years, American-owned automotive manufacturers have experienced numerous supply chain challenges, including material and parts input shortages, labor shortages and strikes, and electrical-component shortages.  Meanwhile, foreign automotive industries, propelled by unfair subsidies and aggressive industrial policies, have grown substantially.  Today, only about half of the vehicles sold in the United States are manufactured domestically, a decline that jeopardizes our domestic industrial base and national security, and the United States’ share of worldwide automobile production has remained stagnant since the February 17, 2019, report.  The number of employees in the domestic automotive industry has also not improved since the February 17, 2019, report. 
    6.  I am also advised that agreements entered into before the issuance of Proclamation 9888, such as the revisions to the United States-Korea Free Trade Agreement and the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), have not yielded sufficient positive outcomes.  The threat to national security posed by imports of automobiles and certain automobile parts remains and has increased.  Investments resulting from other efforts, such as legislation, have also not yielded sufficient positive outcomes to eliminate the threat to national security from such imports.
    7.  After considering the current information newly provided by the Secretary, among other things, I find that imports of automobiles and certain automobile parts continue to threaten to impair the national security of the United States and deem it necessary and appropriate to impose tariffs, as defined below, to adjust imports of automobiles and certain automobile parts so that such imports will not threaten to impair national security.
    8.  To ensure that the imposition of tariffs on automobiles and certain automobile parts in this proclamation are not circumvented and that the purpose of this action to eliminate the threat to the national security of the United States by imports of automobiles and certain automobile parts is not undermined, I also deem it necessary and appropriate to establish processes to identify and impose tariffs on additional automobile parts, as further described below.
    9.  Section 232 provides that, in this situation, the President shall take such other actions as the President deems necessary to adjust the imports of the relevant article so that such imports will not threaten to impair national security.  
    10.  Section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483), authorizes the President to embody in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) the substance of statutes affecting import treatment, and actions thereunder, including the removal, modification, continuance, or imposition of any rate of duty or other import restriction.
    NOW, THEREFORE, I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code; section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended; and section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, do hereby proclaim as follows:(1)  Except as otherwise provided in this proclamation, all imports of articles specified in Annex I to this proclamation or in any subsequent annex to this proclamation, as set out in a subsequent notice in the Federal Register, shall be subject to a 25 percent tariff with respect to goods entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on April 3, 2025, for automobiles, and on the date specified in the Federal Register for automobile parts, but no later than May 3, 2025, and shall continue in effect, unless such actions are expressly reduced, modified, or terminated.  The above ad valorem tariff is in addition to any other duties, fees, exactions, and charges applicable to such imported automobiles and certain automobile parts articles.(2)  For automobiles that qualify for preferential tariff treatment under the USMCA, importers of such automobiles may submit documentation to the Secretary identifying the amount of U.S. content in each model imported into the United States.  “U.S. content” refers to the value of the automobile attributable to parts wholly obtained, produced entirely, or substantially transformed in the United States.  Thereafter, the Secretary may approve imports of such automobiles to be eligible to apply the ad valorem tariff of 25 percent in clause (1) of this proclamation exclusively to the value of the non-U.S. content of the automobile.  The non-U.S. content of the automobile shall be calculated by subtracting the value of the U.S. content in an automobile from the total value of the automobile.(3)  If U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) determines that the declared value of non-U.S. content of an automobile, as described in clause (2) of this proclamation, is inaccurate due to an overstatement of U.S. content, the 25 percent tariff shall apply to the full value of the automobile, regardless of the actual U.S. content of the automobile.  In addition, the 25 percent tariff shall be applied retroactively (from April 3, 2025, to the date of the inaccurate overstatement) and prospectively (from the date of the inaccurate overstatement to the date the importer corrects the overstatement, as verified by CBP) to the full value of all automobiles of the same model imported by the same importer.  This clause does not apply to or otherwise affect any other applicable fees or penalties.(4)  The ad valorem tariff of 25 percent described in clause (1) of this proclamation shall not apply to automobile parts that qualify for preferential treatment under the USMCA until such time that the Secretary, in consultation with CBP, establishes a process to apply the tariff exclusively to the value of the non-U.S. content of such automobile parts and publishes notice in the Federal Register.(5)  For avoidance of doubt, clause (4) of this proclamation does not apply to automobile knock-down kits or parts compilations.  Clause (4) of this proclamation applies only to individual automobile parts as defined by Annex I to this proclamation that otherwise meet the requirements of clause (4) of this proclamation.(6)  The Secretary, in consultation with the United States International Trade Commission and CBP, shall determine the modifications necessary to the HTSUS to effectuate this proclamation and shall make such modifications to the HTSUS through notice in the Federal Register.  (7)  Within 90 days of the date of this proclamation, the Secretary shall establish a process for including additional automobile parts articles within the scope of the tariffs described in clause (1) of this proclamation. In addition to inclusions made by the Secretary, this process shall provide for including additional automobile parts articles at the request of a domestic producer of an automobile or automobile parts article, or an industry association representing one or more such producers, where the request establishes that imports of additional automobile parts articles have increased in a manner that threatens to impair the national security or otherwise undermines the objectives set forth in any proclamation issued on the basis of the Secretary’s February 17, 2019, report or any additional information submitted to the President under clause (3) of Proclamation 9888 or clause (9) of this proclamation. When the Secretary receives such a request from a domestic producer or industry association, the Secretary, after consultation with the United States International Trade Commission and CBP, shall issue a determination regarding whether to include the articles within 60 days of receiving the request.  Any additional automobile parts articles that the Secretary has determined to be included within the scope of the tariffs described in clause (1) of this proclamation shall be so included on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time the day after a notice in the Federal Register describing the determination of the Secretary.  The notice in the Federal Register shall be made as soon as practicable but no later than 14 days after the Secretary’s determination.(8) Any automobile or automobile part, except those eligible for admission under “domestic status” as defined in 19 CFR 146.43, that is subject to the duty imposed by this proclamation and that is admitted into a United States foreign trade zone on or after the effective date of this proclamation, in accordance with clause (1) of this proclamation, must be admitted as “privileged foreign status” as defined in 19 CFR 146.41, and will be subject upon entry for consumption to any ad valorem rates of duty related to the classification under the applicable HTSUS subheading.(9)  The Secretary shall continue to monitor imports of automobiles and automobile parts.  The Secretary also shall, from time to time, in consultation with any senior executive branch officials the Secretary deems appropriate, review the status of such imports with respect to national security.  The Secretary shall inform the President of any circumstances that, in the Secretary’s opinion, might indicate the need for further action by the President under section 232.  The Secretary shall also inform the President of any circumstance that, in the Secretary’s opinion, might indicate that the increase in duty rate provided for in this proclamation is no longer necessary.(10)  No drawback shall be available with respect to the duties imposed pursuant to this proclamation.(11)  The Secretary may issue regulations and guidance consistent with this proclamation, including to address operational necessity.(12)  CBP may take any necessary or appropriate measures to administer the tariffs imposed by this proclamation.(13)  Any provision of previous proclamations and Executive Orders that is inconsistent with the actions taken in this proclamation is superseded to the extent of such inconsistency.IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this twenty-sixth day of March, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-five, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-ninth.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Beverly Hills Man Sentenced to 25 Years in Prison for Cannabis and Bottling Company Cons That Caused Nearly $18 Million in Losses

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    LOS ANGELES – A Beverly Hills man was sentenced today to 300 months in federal prison for obtaining nearly $18 million from investors for sham businesses supposedly operating in hemp related industries – all while he was completing a sentence in a prior criminal case.

    Mark Roy Anderson, 70, was sentenced by United States District Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha, who scheduled a restitution hearing for June 4.

    At today’s hearing, Judge Aenlle-Rocha said, “The magnitude of the fraud is breathtaking…the [victims’ statements reflect] the depth of the harm. Many have lost their life savings reflecting decades of hard work.” Judge Aenlle-Rocha also described Anderson as “an accomplished and incorrigible con man” and stated that “the public must be protected from him for as long as possible.”

    Anderson pleaded guilty in April 2024 to two counts of wire fraud. He has been in federal custody since May 2023.

    Anderson engaged in two separate but related schemes that swindled victims, which he committed shortly after his release from federal prison but while serving out the rest of his prison term on home confinement and, later, while on supervised release for a previous fraud conviction.

    “The defendant stole more than $18 million from dozens of investors by promising quick returns on their investments into hemp farms and other exotic investments,” said Acting United States Attorney Joseph McNally. “Today’s 25-year sentence takes him off the street so that he cannot harm other victims.”

               Harvest Farm Group

    In the first scheme, from June 2020 to April 2021, Anderson tricked investors into providing funding for his company, called Harvest Farm Group, to harvest hemp supposedly being grown on his farm and then process that hemp into medical-grade cannabidiol (CBD) isolate – a chemical found in marijuana – to be sold for a substantial profit.

    Anderson convinced investors to invest in Harvest Farm Group by falsely representing that, through the company, he owned and operated a hemp farm in Kern County. He also lied that had already completed successful and profitable harvests of hemp from the farm. He also falsely said he was using his own machinery and equipment to convert the hemp into CBD isolate and Delta 8, a psychoactive substance that, like CBD isolate, could be used in consumer products ranging from olive oil to body cream.

    Anderson attempted to maintain a veneer of trustworthiness by taking steps to assure investors Harvest Farm Group was legitimate and he was not the “Mark Roy Anderson” with multiple prior fraud convictions. Anderson concealed that he had been convicted of multiple federal and state felony crimes, including mail fraud, wire fraud, grand theft, forgery, preparing false evidence, and money laundering. He also concealed that he was still serving a criminal sentence and was on supervised release at the time he was soliciting investments.

    To stall victim investors from making collection efforts and reporting him to law enforcement, Anderson falsely promised victims he would pay them money from purported sales of products made to Canadian companies, that sales of products had been delayed because of the COVID-19 pandemic, and that he would otherwise return their money.

               Bio Pharma and Verta Bottling

    In the second scheme, which ran from April 2021 to May 2023, Anderson deceived investors by soliciting money for Bio Pharma and Verta Bottling, two of his sham companies, by claiming that these businesses successfully manufactured, bottled, and packaged commercial products.

    Specifically, Anderson falsely told investors Bio Pharma purportedly manufactured and sold products infused with CBD, including products such as CBD-infused avocado oil, olive oil, pain cream, gummies, tequila, and chili oil. Anderson also claimed that Verta Bottling manufactured and sold beverages and a variety of food products.

    Anderson falsely stated that his bottling companies owned and possessed millions of dollars’ worth of assets, including – in Bio Pharma’s case – hemp biomass, CBD isolate, CBD oil, and – in Verta Bottling’s case – manufacturing equipment and an assignable lease for a warehouse to manufacture and sell its products.

    Anderson’s other lies to investors included false claims that his bottling companies had at least $10 million in purchase-order contracts from suppliers. He drafted fake legal and business documents, which included fabricated purchase order contracts purporting to show agreements with third party companies to purchase tens of millions of dollars’ worth of products manufactured by the Anderson bottling companies. Anderson also provided victims samples of products purportedly manufactured by his purported bottling companies.

    Instead of investing victim funds as he promised, Anderson instead used their money on personal expenses. He has agreed to forfeit his ill-gotten gains from these schemes, including 15 cars – one of them a Ferrari – and real estate in Ojai.

    In total, Anderson solicited more than $18.8 million from 45 victims for both schemes, causing victims to lose approximately $17,745,150.

    The FBI investigated this matter.

    Assistant United States Attorney Kerry L. Quinn of the Major Frauds Section prosecuted this case.

    MIL Security OSI –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Africa: Motsoaledi urges global action to address health funding gaps

    Source: South Africa News Agency

    Health Minister Dr Aaron Motsoaledi has reiterated the importance of nations reallocating resources towards health, strengthening global health partnerships, and exploring innovative financing mechanisms to address funding gaps.

    The Minister was delivering the keynote address at the second meeting of the G20 Health Working Group today in Ballito, KwaZulu-Natal.

    The Minister used the platform to highlight South Africa’s commitment to universal health coverage (UHC) through the National Health Insurance (NHI) system, which aims to provide financial protection and efficient resource utilisation.

    “In South Africa, we are actively pursuing transformation to achieve universal health coverage through our NHI system.

    “The NHI is designed to provide financial protection for all, ensuring that access to quality healthcare is not dependent on one’s ability to pay [for] it, and it will also assist in the efficient utilisation of our resources by pulling funds and strategically purchasing services.”

    Motsoaledi cited data from the World Health Organisation (WHO), which indicate that the number of people shielded from catastrophic health spending had been steadily increasing before the COVID-19 pandemic. However, since then, about 100 million people have fallen back into financial hardship due to health-related expenses.

    Motsoaledi believes that the NHI is a concrete demonstration of government’s commitment to leaving no one behind, and fostering and strengthening the resilience of the health system.

    The Minister quoted the late Harvard Department of Anthropology’s Professor Paul Farmer on the value of all lives and urged G20 members to increase public financing of health systems as a fundamental investment.

    “I want to quote the idea that ‘some lives matter less’ is the root of all that is wrong with the world.

    “We implore all G20 members to champion increased public financing of health systems.

    “This is not merely a budgetary issue; it’s a fundamental investment in our collective future.”

    Motsoaledi urged attendees to prioritise public health over competing interests, ensuring that adequate resources are allocated to meet the health needs of the nation’s populations.

    “Furthermore, we must all align our efforts beyond financing. We must address the persistent health inequities that plague our world.”

    Non-communicable diseases

    Motsoaledi highlighted the importance of addressing health inequities, particularly in low and middle-income countries, and the need for multilateral approaches to prevent and control non-communicable diseases (NCDs).

    He said the upcoming United Nations High-Level Meeting on NCDs is seen as a crucial opportunity to galvanise global action against chronic conditions like heart disease, cancer, diabetes and chronic respiratory diseases.

    “We must alleviate the financial burden, restrict unhealthy food marketing, finance emergency health services, and accelerate cervical cancer elimination, the only cancer which is preventable.”

    The theme of the three-day meeting is: “Accelerating Health Equity, Solidarity, and Universal Coverage”.

    Along with this meeting, a co-sponsored event focused on eliminating cervical cancer, is also taking place.

    “We must move beyond dialogue and commit to concrete steps. South Africa is committed to collaborating with all the G20 members to achieve our shared goals. 

    “Let us work together to ensure that health remains a priority, not a commodity, especially during these unstable economic times,” Motsoaledi added.

    South Africa, which assumed the G20 Presidency in December, is currently hosting various working groups and ministerial meetings throughout the country. 

    These meetings are focused on key topics such as health, employment, trade, tourism, and the digital economy — all in preparation for the G20 Leaders’ Summit scheduled for November this year.

    The G20 comprises 19 countries including Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, Türkiye, United Kingdom, and the United States. It also includes two regional bodies – the European Union (EU) and the African Union (AU). – SAnews.gov.za

    MIL OSI Africa –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Durbin, Grassley Introduce Bill To Put Cameras In Supreme Court

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Illinois Dick Durbin

    March 26, 2025

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL), Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and U.S. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA), Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, introduced legislation today to require open proceedings of the Supreme Court to be televised. The bipartisan Cameras in the Courtroom Act would require the Supreme Court to permit television coverage of all open sessions of the Court, unless the Court decides, by a majority vote of the justices, that doing so would constitute a violation of the due process rights of one or more of the parties before the Court. U.S. Representative Gerry Connolly (D-VA-11) introduced the House companion legislation today.

    “It’s time to put cameras in the Supreme Court so Americans can finally see arguments and decisions in cases that will affect them for generations to come. This bipartisan bill shines a light into the judicial branch of government so more than just a few hundred lucky Americans can watch proceedings in the Court’s historic halls,” Durbin said.

    “The judicial branch has a massive impact on our daily lives and the lives of generations to come, yet few Americans get the chance to see our nation’s courts in action,” Grassley said. “Allowing cameras access to the federal and Supreme Courts would boost transparency and help Americans grow in confidence and understanding of the judiciary.”

    “Our nation’s highest court is in desperate need of transparency and reform,” said Connolly. “The Supreme Court is not some mystical priesthood that can operate outside of the public view. It is a coequal branch of government and must be accountable to the American public. Our legislation strengthens efforts to restore trust in an institution that for too long has operated in the dark. It’s time for cameras in the courtroom.”

    Historically, oral arguments and other sessions of the Supreme Court are only open to the public in person and on a first-come basis. Those not fortunate enough to get a seat in the Courtroom in the past have had to wait for secondhand accounts from reporters, read transcripts, or listen to audio recordings released later – along with the millions of other Americans who still ought to be able to see and hear these discussions on issues at the forefront of government. In May 2020, the Supreme Court held oral arguments remotely and made the live audio available for the public for the first time as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic – a successful process that has continued since returning to in-person proceedings. However, video of the proceedings remains unavailable.

    The Cameras in the Courtroom Act only applies to open sessions of the Supreme Court – sessions where members of the public are already invited to observe in person, but often cannot, because there are a very limited number of unreserved seats in the Courtroom. Allowing public scrutiny of Supreme Court proceedings would produce greater accountability, transparency, and understanding of our judicial system.

    U.S. Senators Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) also co-sponsored the legislation.

    -30-

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Pulse Oximeter Basics

    Source: US Food and Drug Administration

    Image

    Español中文한국의TagalogTiếng Việt
    We need oxygen to survive. Sometimes the amount of oxygen in the blood falls too low for the body to function well. Asthma, lung cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the flu, and heart disease are among the health conditions that can cause oxygen levels to drop. Being at higher altitudes, where the amount of oxygen in the air can be less than at sea level, can be another factor that can cause oxygen levels to drop.
    One way to monitor the level of oxygen in the blood is by using a device called a pulse oximeter, or pulse ox.  A pulse oximeter can estimate the amount of oxygen in the blood without having to draw a blood sample.
    What is a pulse oximeter?
    A pulse oximeter is a device that is usually clipped on a fingertip and uses light beams to estimate a person’s blood oxygen level (oxygen saturation) and their pulse rate.
    Most pulse oximeters show two or three numbers. The most important number, oxygen saturation level, is usually abbreviated SpO2, and is presented as a percentage. The pulse rate (similar to heart rate) is typically abbreviated PR. Sometimes there is a third number for strength of the signal.
    Oxygen saturation values are between 95% and 100% for most healthy individuals but sometimes can be lower in people with lung and heart problems, for example. Oxygen saturation levels are also generally slightly lower for those living at higher altitudes.
    Using a pulse oximeter
    If you are using a pulse oximeter to monitor your oxygen levels at home, in addition to your pulse oximeter reading, keep track of your symptoms and how you feel. Contact a health care provider if you are concerned about the pulse oximeter reading, or your symptoms are serious or get worse.
    To get the best reading when using a pulse oximeter at home:

    Follow your health care provider’s advice about when and how often to check your oxygen levels.
    Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for use.
    When placing the pulse oximeter on your finger, make sure your hand is warm, relaxed, and held below the level of the heart. Remove any fingernail polish on that finger.
    Sit still and do not move the part of your body where the pulse oximeter is located.
    Wait a few seconds until the reading stops changing and displays one steady number.
    Write down your oxygen level and the date and time of the reading so you can track any changes and report these to your health care provider.

    Be familiar with signs or symptoms of low oxygen levels:

    Bluish coloring in the face, lips, or nails.
    Shortness of breath, difficulty breathing, or a cough that gets worse.
    Restlessness and discomfort.
    Chest pain or tightness.
    Fast/racing pulse rate.

    Be aware that some people with low oxygen levels may not show any or all these symptoms. Only a health care provider can diagnose a medical condition such as hypoxia (low oxygen levels). Pulse oximeter readings should be considered in context with other information, including signs and symptoms of low oxygen.
    As with any device, there is always a risk of an inaccurate reading. Be aware multiple factors can affect the accuracy of a pulse oximeter reading, such as poor circulation, skin pigmentation, skin thickness, skin temperature, current tobacco use, and use of fingernail polish.
    Categories of pulse oximeters and FDA clearance
    Certain pulse oximeters are intended for medical purposes and are primarily used in hospital settings or doctors’ offices. Pulse oximeters for medical purposes are typically used to monitor (i.e. trending or spot checking) oxygen saturation levels of patients to help in clinical decision-making.
    Currently, a small number of these pulse oximeters intended for medical purposes are available over the counter (OTC) following clearance by the FDA.
    There also are pulse oximeters that are sold as general wellness products or sporting/aviation products. These are not reviewed or evaluated by the agency before being available to the public. Such products are often sold directly to consumers in stores or online and are intended for estimating oxygen saturation often for purposes of general wellness (such as encouraging a general state of health or healthy lifestyle).
    The FDA recognizes that during the COVID-19 pandemic, many people purchased OTC pulse oximeters that are considered general wellness products. These products are not evaluated by the agency for use in clinical decision-making or determining whether to seek medical intervention.
    Current scientific evidence suggests there are some accuracy differences in pulse oximeter performance between individuals with lighter and darker skin pigmentation. The FDA previously informed patients and health care professionals that although pulse oximetry is useful for estimating blood oxygen levels, pulse oximeters have limitations and a risk of inaccuracy under certain circumstances, including use on patients with darker skin pigmentation, that should be considered.
    In addition to the safety communication, to address concerns around the accuracy of these devices, the FDA held advisory committee meetings, published a discussion paper for comment, and published a draft guidance in January 2025 that outlines proposed recommendations to help improve the accuracy and performance of pulse oximeters that are used for medical purposes across the range of skin pigmentations.
    Reporting Problems with a Device
    If you experienced a problem or injury that you think may be related to a pulse oximeter, you can voluntarily report it through the FDA’s MedWatch program.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: Agriculture Committee adopts two decisions to enhance transparency, notifications

    Source: WTO

    Headline: Agriculture Committee adopts two decisions to enhance transparency, notifications

    Tariff-Rate Quotas (TRQs) allow a specified quantity of a product to be imported at a lower tariff rate, while any quantity exceeding that limit is subject to higher tariffs.
    Triennial reviews of Nairobi and Bali decisions
    The Chair announced that members successfully concluded the third triennial review of the Nairobi Decision on Export Competition in December 2024 through a written procedure. The outcome package includes the Review Report (G/AG/39 ) and a decision on a comprehensive export competition notification requirements and formats (G/AG/2/Add.2 ). This streamlines the relevant notification requirements adopted in 1995 (G/AG/2 ) and integrates the export competition questionnaire (ECQ) from the Nairobi Decision. She thanked members for their constructive engagement in reaching consensus.
    Members also adopted a key document on enhanced transparency of TRQ administration notifications (RD/AG/134/Rev.2)  in order to implement the Bali Decision on Tariff Rate Quota administration. Members hailed the successful adoption of the decision on TRQ notifications (G/AG/2/Add.3), recognizing it as the culmination of months of hard work and productive dialogue.
    Members also launched discussions on the second triennial review of the operation of the Bali Decision and shared their expectations of the review.
    Updates on agricultural market developments, food security
    Members heard updated reports from the World Food Programme(WFP), the International Grains Council (IGC) and the World Bank on the latest developments in food security and agriculture. The organizations were invited to the Committee to share information and experiences as a follow-up to  the report and recommendations of the work programme undertaken pursuant to the MC12 declaration on food insecurity.
    The WFP warned that the world is entering a period of high uncertainty, marked by a worsening global food security crisis and humanitarian funding cuts. It estimated that 343 million people suffered from acute food insecurity across 74 countries in 2024 — nearly 200 million more than pre-pandemic levels.
    The WFP stressed that conflict remains the primary driver of food insecurity in war zones, including Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Gaza and Somalia. Other factors, such as climate change, economic instability, rising food prices and currency depreciation, continue to affect food supply in developing economies.
    The WFP urged governments to find political solutions to end conflicts, strengthen food systems and enhance support for local economies. It also called for governments to secure funding to protect vulnerable populations and build community food resilience.
    The IGC projected record grain production and a global rebound in grain trade in 2025–26, driven by strong demand from Asia and Africa, as well as other positive market trends. The IGC also outlined its ongoing efforts to improve and standardize trade statistics for rice through better classification of rice types in global trade. It has also developed a dashboard for net food-importing countries to track market changes and refine food security strategies.
    The World Bank echoed concerns raised by the WFP and IGC, stating that acute food insecurity remains at record levels, with an estimated 713–757 million people undernourished. It introduced its Global Challenge Program on Food and Nutrition Security, which includes early warning systems, cross-sectoral approaches to nutrition, and improved access to climate finance for smallholders.
    The World Bank reaffirmed its commitment to nutrition security, emphasizing its alignment with global efforts such as the Nutrition for Growth Summit in Paris and its integration of nutrition objectives across health, agriculture and social protection investments.
    Members thanked the international organizations for their updates. Some highlighted concerns over food insecurity in least developed countries (LDCs) and net food-importing developing countries (NFIDCs), citing conflict, climate change and high import dependency as key challenges. Others emphasized the need for greater financial support for food and climate resilience while urging the WTO to address the root causes of food insecurity through further agricultural reforms.
    Members also discussed follow-up to Food Security Work Programme recommendations (G/AG/38) from the 12th Ministerial Conference. The Chair commended members’ efforts in implementing some of these recommendations within the Committee and the Working Group on Trade, Debt and Finance. Some members stressed the need to turn recommendations into concrete actions, including informal dedicated workshops to share experiences.
    Review of the NFIDC list 
    Divergences remain on the annual review of the NFIDCs list, which is undertaken annually in the Committee’s March meeting. Some members favoured a data-based review exercise requiring NFIDCs to present updated statistics, whereas some others saw no basis to submit such data by NFIDCs beyond their inclusion in the list.
    The discussion concluded without a common understanding of whether the annual review had been accomplished. Some members called for continued discussions in subsequent meetings, while others opposed extending talks beyond the annual March meeting. At the same time, members agreed that the current list (G/AG/5/Rev.12) remains valid unless consensus dictates otherwise.
    Review of agricultural policies
    A total of 208 questions were raised by members concerning individual notifications and specific implementation matters during the meeting. This peer review process allows members to address issues related to the implementation of commitments outlined in the Agreement on Agriculture. Of these, 31 issues were raised for the first time, while 15 were recurring matters from previous Committee meetings.
    The 31 new items covered a range of topics, including Australia’s food and fibre program, Brazil’s rural initiative, Canada’s multiple farm and dairy support programs, and the European Union’s tariffs on Russian agri-food imports. Other topics included India’s sugar support and tariff changes on Bourbon whiskey, Indonesia’s various farm support policies, and Japan’s support for CO₂ reduction and fertilizer procurement. Members also reviewed Paraguay’s financial assistance to farmers, Switzerland’s farm payments, Thailand’s debt relief measures and rice support, Türkiye’s tax and pricing systems, the United Kingdom’s productivity-boosting scheme, and the United States’ applied tariffs and multiple farm support programs.
    Since the previous meeting in November 2024, a total of 110 individual notifications have been submitted to the Committee, covering market access, domestic support, export competition and notifications in the context of the NFIDC Decision. The majority of these notifications — 45 in total — pertain to export competition.
    The Chair urged members to submit timely and complete notifications and to respond to overdue questions, stressing the critical importance of enhanced transparency.
    All questions submitted for the meeting are available in G/AG/W/252. All questions and replies received are available in the WTO’s Agriculture Information Management System (AG IMS).
    Technology transfer
    The Chair reported productive discussions at an informal meeting on 13 February regarding guidance on how to pursue further discussions on technology transfer in 2025.
    Some members expressed interest in shifting discussions from experience-sharing to the WTO framework of rules and its role in promoting agricultural innovations and technologies. While they acknowledged that the Agreement on Agriculture provides a clear policy and legal basis for agricultural technology transfer — essential for improving food security and rural development — barriers remain in accessing these technologies, highlighting the need for affordable innovations. To address these challenges, these members suggested future seminars to discuss both policy considerations under the Agreement on Agriculture and practical country case studies.
    Some members also emphasized the need for the Committee to further explore sustainable agriculture, with a focus on practical, expert-led discussions. One suggestion was to highlight the importance of capacity building in developing economies, supported by strengthened collaboration with regional research centres.
    The Chair noted the need to continue discussions on this agenda item at the next meeting, which will help the incoming Chair plan future work.
    Other business
    The Chair said that the election of the new Chair will be considered at the June meeting, as the consultation process is still ongoing.
    The Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA) briefly introduced its 2025 work plan (G/AG/GEN/248). In close cooperation with the WTO, the IICA will organize a seminar in Paraguay in the second half of the year to train government officials from the region on improving their notification capacity and negotiation skills.
    Next meeting
    The next meeting of the Committee on Agriculture is scheduled for 23-24 June 2025.

    Share

    MIL OSI Economics –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Revitalizing Downtowns in Western New York

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul today announced that the Village of Cattaraugus will receive $10 million in funding as the Western New York winner of the eighth round of the Downtown Revitalization Initiative, and the Villages of Westfield and Angola will each receive $4.5 million as the Western New York winners of the third round of NY Forward. For Round 8 of the Downtown Revitalization Initiative and Round 3 of the NY Forward Program, each of the state’s 10 economic development regions are being awarded $10 million from each program, to make for a total state commitment of $200 million in funding and investments to help communities boost their economies by transforming downtowns into vibrant neighborhoods.

    “Our state’s downtowns unite friends and families, and these investments will only help reshape neighborhoods to become more vibrant destinations for shopping, dining and living,” Governor Hochul said. “Through our Pro-Housing Communities Program, affordable housing opportunities will open up in neighborhoods across Western New York and local economies will thrive from these opportunities.”

    To receive funding from either the DRI or NY Forward program, localities must be certified under Governor Hochul’s Pro-Housing Communities Program — an innovative policy created to recognize and reward municipalities actively working to unlock their housing potential. Governor Hochul’s Pro-Housing Communities initiative allocates up to $650 million each year in discretionary funds for communities that pledge to increase their housing supply; to date, 287 communities across New York have been certified as Pro-Housing Communities. This year, Governor Hochul is proposing an additional $100 million in funding to cover infrastructure projects necessary to create new housing in Pro-Housing Communities, and a further $10.5 million for technical assistance to help communities seeking to foster housing growth.

    Many of the projects funded through the DRI and NY Forward support Governor Hochul’s affordability agenda. The DRI has invested in the creation of more than 4,400 units of housing — 1,823 of which are affordable or workforce housing. The programs committed over $8.5 million to 11 projects that provide affordable or free child care and child care worker training. DRI and NY Forward have also invested in the creation of public parks, public art (such as murals and sculptures) and art, music and cultural venues that provide free outdoor recreation and entertainment opportunities.

    $10 Million Downtown Revitalization Initiative Award for Cattaraugus
    The Village of Cattaraugus is a vibrant community that is protected and tucked away, perched on a steep incline and sheltered by surrounding hills, productive farmlands and mature verdant forests. The original 19th century brick heart of the village, amazingly intact and a designated National Historic District, imbues a sense of history and character. Stores and businesses are locally owned, and the surrounding area abounds with hundreds of creative artists and artisans. The Village seeks to transform its historic red brick Main Street into a communal gathering place where our natural beauty, cultural heritage and small-town character converge to foster economic growth and enhance quality of life. The Village would become a regional attraction for dining and lodging using its industrial rail heritage to encourage outdoor recreation on its trails that will attract visitors and new residents to stay and enjoy the welcoming nature of the Village.

    $4.5 Million NY Forward Award for Westfield
    Westfield is a charming village that graces the southern shore of Lake Erie. This picturesque locale is defined by its stunning waterfront vistas and a wealth of recreational opportunities, inviting residents and visitors to embrace the natural beauty that surrounds them. Visitors and residents enjoy Westfield events like First Fridays, the Arts and Crafts Festival, the weekly Farmer’s Market, the Tour Chautauqua Cycling Event, the Grape and Wine Festival, Christmas in the Village, the Hot Toddy Crawl and the Christmas Cookie weekend. Historically, Westfield’s economy depended on agriculture and industry. Westfield’s vision is to cultivate a vibrant and sustainable community that celebrates its rich history, natural beauty and agricultural heritage while fostering economic growth, creating housing choices and celebrating diverse cultural activities in a safe and welcoming environment.

    $4.5 Million NY Forward Award for Angola
    Located within the Town of Evans, the waterfront cottage village of Angola is a tourism destination area that draws thousands of regional, national and international visitors each year. While the Town benefits from its lakefront, the Village possesses entertainment options that are attractive to visitors like festivals, art attractions and more. The Village seeks to capitalize on community strengths and its strategic location near key assets — waterfront, rich history and natural resources — to create a unique and vibrant downtown destination in the rural Southtowns of Erie County. Leveraging the historic Angola Theater as the anchor, the Village will bolster the local economy and quality of life through its quaint historic buildings, creative visual and performing arts, unique retail and special events.

    New York Secretary of State Walter T. Mosley said, “Governor Hochul recognizes that when we are investing in our communities, we can positively impact not just that community, but the entire region. And that’s exactly what will happen for these three communities receiving awards from our Downtown Revitalization Initiative and NY Forward program. We can’t wait to see how these investments will make Cattaraugus, Westfield, Angola and the entire Western New York region flourish.”

    Empire State Development President, CEO and Commissioner Hope Knight said, “The three Western New York communities selected to be reinvigorated by the latest round of Governor Hochul’s Downtown Revitalization Initiative and NY Forward programs each have unique projects that will boost business, create new housing, improve quality of life for local families, and attract new visitors. We congratulate the Villages of Cattaraugus, Angola, and Westfield for submitting solid plans to improve their downtowns by making smart investments in the existing assets. We are excited to see your blueprints for revitalization become a reality.”

    New York State Homes and Community Renewal Commissioner RuthAnne Visnauskas said, “Today’s $19 million DRI and NY Forward award represents monumental investment in the villages of Cattaraugus, Westfield and Angola, that will assist these three picturesque communities as they increase housing supply while transforming their downtowns to increase vibrancy and bring modern improvements to historic surroundings. This commitment to Western New York is only the latest example of Governor Hochul’s focus on enhancing communities and creating economic opportunities in all of New York’s regions.”

    Western New York Regional Economic Development Council Co-Chairs Steve Stoute and Eric Reich said,“These investments mark a significant step in the revitalization of these vibrant communities. Each village boasts a rich history and cultural heritage, and this funding will help unlock their full potential, while enhancing economic growth, fostering sustainability, and creating welcoming destinations for both residents and visitors. By preserving their distinct character while promoting long-term development, the funding will strengthen local economies and ensure a lasting impact for generations to come. The council extends its gratitude to Governor Kathy Hochul for her steadfast support through the Downtown Revitalization Initiative and the NY Forward program, and we look forward to witnessing the transformative outcomes of these investments.”

    Village of Cattaraugus Mayor Anthony Nagel said, “The Village of Cattaraugus is deeply honored to receive the Downtown Revitalization Initiative grant, a transformative investment in our community’s future. This funding will enable us to revitalize our infrastructure, support local businesses, and enhance the overall quality of life for our residents and visitors. We extend our sincere gratitude to Governor Hochul for recognizing the potential of our village and making this significant investment. With this grant, we are committed to preserving our heritage while fostering a stronger, more vibrant future for generations to come.”

    Village of Westfield Mayor Dennis Lutes said, “On behalf of the Village of Westfield, I am deeply honored that we have been selected as recipients of a NY Forward grant. We extend our heartfelt gratitude to Governor Kathy Hochul for her leadership and for establishing the NY Forward program to support small communities like ours. This investment marks a pivotal moment for Westfield, providing us with an incredible opportunity to revitalize our village and build upon the progress we have already made. We are truly grateful to Governor Hochul, Department of State, the Western New York Regional Economic Development Council, Empire State Development, the Westfield Development Corporation, and all the dedicated stakeholders who contributed to making this application a success. Their hard work and commitment to our community are greatly appreciated.”

    Village of Angola Mayor Thomas M. Whelan said, “I am deeply grateful for the opportunity to receive the NY Forward grant. This funding will have a transformative impact on our community, enabling us to revitalize key areas and enhance the quality of life for our residents, businesses, and visitors. The NY Forward grant reflects New York State’s steadfast commitment to supporting small communities like ours, fostering growth, and driving meaningful progress. We are honored to be a recipient of this initiative and eager to put these funds to work for the betterment of our village. I sincerely appreciate Governor Kathy Hochul and her team for their support and belief in our vision. Her dedication to strengthening small communities is truly inspiring, and we look forward to working together to bring our vision to fruition.”

    Cattaraugus, Westfield and Angola will now begin the process of developing a Strategic Investment Plan to revitalize their downtowns. A Local Planning Committee made up of municipal representatives, community leaders and other stakeholders will lead the effort, supported by a team of private sector experts and state planners. The Strategic Investment Plan will guide the investment of DRI and NY Forward grant funds in revitalization projects that are poised for implementation, will advance the community’s vision for their downtown and that can leverage and expand upon the state’s investment.

    The Western New York Regional Economic Development Council conducted a thorough and competitive review process of proposals submitted from communities throughout the region and considered all criteria before recommending these communities as nominees.

    About the Downtown Revitalization Initiative
    The Downtown Revitalization Initiative was created in 2016 to accelerate and expand the revitalization of downtowns and neighborhoods in all ten regions of the state to serve as centers of activity and catalysts for investment. Led by the Department of State with assistance from Empire State Development, Homes and Community Renewal and NYSERDA, the DRI represents an unprecedented and innovative “plan-then-act” strategy that couples strategic planning with immediate implementation and results in compact, walkable downtowns that are a key ingredient to helping New York State rebuild its economy from the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to achieving the State’s bold climate goals by promoting the use of public transit and reducing dependence on private vehicles. Through eight rounds, the DRI will have awarded a total of $900 million to 89 communities across every region of the State.

    About the NY Forward Program
    First announced as part of the 2022 Budget, Governor Hochul created the NY Forward program to build on the momentum created by the DRI. The program works in concert with the DRI to accelerate and expand the revitalization of smaller and rural downtowns throughout the State so that all communities can benefit from the State’s revitalization efforts, regardless of size, character, needs and challenges.

    NY Forward communities are supported by a professional planning consultant and team of State agency experts led by DOS to develop a Strategic Investment Plan that includes a slate of transformative, complementary and readily implementable projects. NY Forward projects are appropriately scaled to the size of each community; projects may include building renovation and redevelopment, new construction or creation of new or improved public spaces and other projects that enhance specific cultural and historical qualities that define and distinguish the small-town charm that defines these municipalities. Through three rounds, the NY Forward program will have awarded a total of $300 million to 60 communities across every region of the State.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: HIGH SPRINGS MAN SENTENCED TO FEDERAL PRISON FOR WIRE FRAUD

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA – Sean Walker, 34, of High Springs, Florida, was sentenced to 42 months in federal prison for wire fraud in connection with COVID-19 relief fraud. The sentence was announced by Michelle Spaven, Acting United States Attorney for the Northern District of Florida.

    “Our office will continue to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse of taxpayer money, including holding those accountable who conspired to falsely obtain government funds during the COVID‑19 pandemic,” said Acting United States Attorney Spaven.

    Court documents reflect that Walker obtained over $20,000 in unemployment insurance benefits from the State of California, which were funded in part by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. These funds were intended to provide emergency financial assistance to the millions of Americans who were suffering from the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Walker’s benefits application contained materially false and fraudulent statements. Walker knew that he had never lived or worked in that state and was not entitled to unemployment insurance benefits from California.

    In addition to his prison sentence, Walker was also ordered to pay $21,690 in restitution to California’s Employment Development Department. Walker’s imprisonment will also be followed by three years of supervised release.

    Walker is one of nine defendants who were convicted of similar COVID-19 relief fraud as a result of a joint investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI). The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Adam Hapner and David P. Byron.

    “While many were facing hardship and uncertainty, these defendants sought to exploit government programs intended to help those in need,” said Special Agent in Charge Ron Loecker, of the IRS-CI, Tampa Field Office. “Their actions were driven by greed and a blatant disregard for the law, undermining the purpose of critical relief efforts. We remain committed to holding accountable those who abuse these programs for personal gain and ensuring that justice is served.”

    “The sentencing of Sean Walker conveys the important message that you cannot steal money from Americans without consequence,” said Kristin Rehler, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Jacksonville Division. “The funds stolen by this defendant and other co-conspirators add to the massive amount of COVID-19 relief fraud that will ultimately be paid for by taxpayers. The FBI’s investigation into these schemes exemplifies our commitment to hold thieves accountable, and we will continue to work in coordination with our partners to protect the pocketbooks of hard-working Americans.”

    The COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force marshals the resources of the Department of Justice in partnership with agencies across government to enhance efforts to combat and prevent pandemic-related fraud. The Task Force bolsters efforts to investigate and prosecute the most culpable domestic and international criminal actors and assists agencies tasked with administering relief programs to prevent fraud by augmenting and incorporating existing coordination mechanisms, identifying resources and techniques to uncover fraudulent actors and their schemes, and sharing and harnessing information and insights gained from prior enforcement efforts. For more information on the department’s response to the pandemic, please visit Justice.gov/Coronavirus and Justice.gov/Coronavirus/CombatingFraud.

    Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 relief funds can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline via the NCDF Web Complaint Form.

    The United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Florida is one of 94 offices that serve as the nation’s principal litigators under the direction of the Attorney General.  To access public court documents online, please visit the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida website. For more information about the United States Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Florida, visit http://www.justice.gov/usao/fln/index.html.

    MIL Security OSI –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Florida Man Pleads Guilty to Scheming to Defraud Maryland, California of More Than $2.3 Million in Covid-19 Unemployment Insurance Benefits

    Source: United States Department of Justice (National Center for Disaster Fraud)

    Baltimore, Maryland – David Godin, 34, aka “James St Patrick,” aka “David Wetty,” aka “Vic Pro,” of Miami, Florida, has pleaded guilty to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft, in connection with a scheme to defraud the Maryland Department of Labor (MD-DOL) and California Employment Development Department (CA-EDD). Godin attempted to defraud MD-DOL and CA-EDD of more than $2.3 million in unemployment insurance (UI) benefits during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Kelly O. Hayes, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland, announced the guilty plea with Special Agent in Charge Troy W. Springer, National Capital Region, U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Inspector General (DOL-OIG), and Special Agent in Charge Kareem A. Carter, Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI), Washington, D.C. Field Office.

    According to the plea agreement, from June 2020 through November 2023, Godin engaged in a sophisticated scheme to defraud the MD-DOL and CA-EDD by using the personal identifiable information of identity theft victims, anonymous email addresses, virtual private networks, and proxy servers.  This enabled Godin to file numerous fraudulent UI claims with multiple states from a single location; aggregate UI information in discrete accounts; and avoid fraud safeguards put in place by state insurance programs.

    Godin submitted and caused the submission of at least 140 fraudulent UI claims to MD-DOL, CA-EDD, and other state workforce agencies, resulting in approximately $2,364,226 in UI benefits. He obtained $1,087,345.66 through the fraud scheme. As part of the plea agreement, Godin is required to pay restitution of $1,087,345.66. Additionally, Godin must forfeit money, property, and/or assets that he obtained through the scheme, including a money judgment of at least $1,087,345.66.

    Godin faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison for the wire fraud scheme and a consecutive mandatory minimum sentence of two years in federal prison for using the personal identifiable information of identity theft victims during and in relation to the fraudulent activities.   A federal district court judge determines sentencing after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors. U.S. District Judge Matthew J. Maddox has scheduled sentencing for June 30, at 10 a.m.   

    This case is part of the District of Maryland COVID-19 Strike Force, a Strike Force that is one of five strike forces established throughout the United States by the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute COVID-19 fraud, including fraud relating to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.  The CARES Act was designed to provide emergency financial assistance to Americans suffering the economic effects caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.  The strike forces focus on large-scale, multi-state pandemic relief fraud perpetrated by criminal organizations and transnational actors.  The strike forces are interagency law enforcement efforts, using prosecutor-led and data analyst-driven teams designed to identify and bring to justice those who stole pandemic relief funds.

    For more information about the Department’s response to the pandemic, please visit https://www.justice.gov/coronavirus.  Anyone with information about allegations of attempted fraud involving COVID-19 can report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline at 866-720-5721 or via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form.

    U.S. Attorney Hayes commended DOL-OIG and IRS-CI for their work in the investigation.  Ms. Hayes also thanked Assistant U.S. Attorneys Bijon A. Mostoufi and Jared M. Beim, who are prosecuting the federal case, and Joanna N. Huber, who is supporting the case.

    For more information about the Maryland U.S. Attorney’s Office, its priorities, and resources available to report fraud, please visit www.justice.gov/usao-md and https://www.justice.gov/usao-md/report-fraud.

    # # #

     

    MIL Security OSI –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Reed & Young Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Promote Service & Boost Civic Engagement

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Rhode Island Jack Reed
    WASHINGTON, D.C. – In an effort to bring Americans together through service to the nation and their fellow citizens, U.S. Senators Jack Reed (D-RI) and Todd Young (R-IN) reintroduced legislation that would create a whole of government approach to addressing military, national, and public service needs.
    This legislation is based on recommendations published by the bipartisan National Commission on Military, National and Public Service that Senator Reed and the late Senator John McCain established to review the military selective service process and consider methods to increase participation in military, national, and other public service to address the needs of the nation. 
    The Commission published its final report and recommendations five years ago, just as the pandemic began to grip the nation, setting off a decline in the rates of volunteerism from 30 percent to 23.2 percent according to data from AmeriCorps.  The Commission called for a ten-year goal for five million Americans to begin participating in military, national, or public service each year.
    Additionally, the Commission set targets for ensuring there are more than enough qualified individuals seeking to serve in the Armed Forces and for modernizing government personnel systems to attract and enable Americans with critical skills to enter public service. The Unity through Service Act would provide the architecture and focus to mobilize a collaborative approach across government to achieving these goals.
    According to the latest research compiled by AmeriCorps, volunteerism has begun to rebound following the pandemic with 28.3 percent of Americans formally volunteering in 2023, giving nearly five billion hours of service with an economic value of $167.2 billion.
    “Recent growth in volunteerism and service show that Americans are ready and willing to answer the call to serve, to come together and meet the challenges we are facing. We must create the conditions to mobilize them and strengthen opportunities to serve,” said Senator Reed. “That is why I am proud to join Senator Young in introducing the Unity through Service Act, reaffirming our national culture of service and elevating all forms of service by leveraging the strengths of our existing programs.”
    “Civic engagement and giving back to the community are woven into the fabric of the American spirit. Our bill would increase Americans’ awareness of service opportunities that target community-specific needs, while also appropriately stewarding taxpayer dollars,” said Senator Young.
    In addition to Senators Reed and Young, the legislation is cosponsored by U.S. Senator Chris Coons (D-DE) and was introduced in the House of Representatives by U.S. Representatives Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA-6), Jimmy Panetta (D-CA-19), Jack Bergman (R-MI-1), and Don Bacon (R-NE-2).
    The Unity through Service Act would elevate all forms of service, making it easier for Americans to identify service opportunities that align with their skills and goals.
    This bill would establish an Interagency Council on Service to coordinate and lead initiatives that extend across military, national, and public service. The Council will be tasked with preparing and submitting to the President a national strategy on service, including a review of current programs, initiatives and online content.
    Furthermore, the Unity through Service Act would authorize a joint advertising, market research, and recruiting program with the Department of Defense (DOD), the Corporation for National and Community Service (CNCS), and the Peace Corps to identify successful strategies and efficiently share this information across agencies. The bill would require a quadrennial report to Congress on initiatives to integrate military, national, and public service programs.
    This legislation is endorsed by the Service Year Alliance, America’s Service Commissions, Voices for National Service, and With Honor Action.
    “Service Year Alliance was proud to support the Unity Through Service Act when it was introduced, and we remain champions for the passage of this legislation today,” said Kristen Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of Service Year Alliance. “Americans want to serve, and it’s paramount that we bridge our efforts on military, national, and public service, as the Unity Through Service Act calls for, to best harness this goodwill for our shared future. As advocates for national service, we know that service years develop leaders, build skills for success in a changing economy, and offer solutions for creating more resilient communities — and we should be doing everything in our power to make it an opportunity for all. The Unity Through Service Act is a vital next step that brings us closer to achieving this vision.”
    “On behalf of our nation’s State and Territorial Service Commissions, we thank Sen. Reed (D-RI) and Sen. Young (R-IN) for their support of the bipartisan Unity Through National Service Act. National service enables Americans to address critical issues in our communities and instills a sense of mission and purpose in those that serve. We look forward to engaging with the Interagency Council on Service to advise the President on ways that national, military, and public service partners – and importantly our states – can work together to promote and expand opportunities to serve our country and improve those experiences,” said Kaira Esgate, CEO of America’s Service Commissions. “Critically, the Council would also develop new interagency partnerships to address national challenges and support the transition between branches of service and into careers. We urge Congress to advance this bipartisan legislation as soon as possible.”
    “National service is a powerful force for uniting Americans in common purpose, and the Unity through Service Act represents an important step forward in ensuring more people can serve,” said AnnMaura Connolly, President of Voices for National Service. “By elevating service and fostering greater collaboration across agencies, this bill will help strengthen national service programs, open new pathways to service, and enable more Americans to contribute to their communities and country. The Voices for National Service community is grateful to Senators Reed and Young for their leadership and their continued commitment to expanding opportunities for service.”
    “As we celebrate the fifth anniversary National Commission on Military, National, and Public Service’s Inspired to Serve report, With Honor Action is proud to endorse the Unity Through Service Act. As a veteran-founded and veteran-led organization, we strongly believe in the critical role that service, both in and out of uniform, plays in our democracy. By creating an Interagency Council on Service and coordinating efforts across federal agencies, this bill strengthens civic engagement and promotes service opportunities for all Americans,” said Rye Barcott, CEO of With Honor Action. “We applaud the leadership of Senator Reed for his continued service to our nation.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Cassidy, Padilla Reintroduce Bill to Modernize Health Care System, Improve Access to Digital Health Services

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Louisiana Bill Cassidy
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators Bill Cassidy, M.D. (R-LA) and Alex Padilla (D-CA) reintroduced the Health Accelerating Consumers’ Care by Expediting Self-Scheduling (ACCESS) Act to improve patients’ access to modernized health care, provide certainty for patients seeking digital health services, and protect patients’ personal health information.
    “It’s enough to struggle with an illness. Patients should have easy access to the care they need,” said Dr. Cassidy. “There are plenty of tools to provide affordable, quality care. As a doctor, I’m focused on using them.”
    “Every American deserves easy access to physical and mental health care,” said Senator Padilla. “As provider wait times increase, integrating digital health programs into our health care system is essential to efficiently administering care. We cannot let scheduling obstacles prevent Americans in crisis from receiving care when they need it most.”
    The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the demand for digital health services and other innovative practices. Under current law, however, there is no distinction between illegal referral practices and scheduling services that reduce the barriers associated with accessing necessary and appropriate care. The Health ACCESS Act would adjust the Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) to remove the regulatory ambiguity allowing digital health and appointment booking platforms to work together to better serve patients. Doing so ultimately improves access to care via user-friendly services, expands provider choice and scheduling availability, and enhances the overall health care experience and ecosystem.
    The Health ACCESS Act is supported by Advanced Dermatology and Cosmetic Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Brownsville Community Health Center (FQHC), California Children’s Hospital Association, California Hospital Association, Circle Medical, Chronic Care Policy Alliance, Corewell Health, Digital Health New York (DHNY), GoHealth Urgent Care, Grow Therapy, HANYS (Health Assoc of NYS), Healthcare Leadership Council (HLC), Housing Works Community Healthcare (FQHC), Illinois Hospital Association, Indiana University Health, Intermountain Health, LabFinder, Main Line Health, Manhattan Cardiology, Medical Offices of Manhattan, Memorial Hermann Health System, Octave, SohoMD, Spring Branch Community Health Center (FQHC), Stanford Children’s Hospital, and The Dermatology Specialists.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Global population data is in crisis – here’s why that matters

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Andrew J Tatem, WorldPop Director, Professor of Spatial Demography and Epidemiology, University of Southampton

    Arthimedes/Shutterstock

    Every day, decisions that affect our lives depend on knowing how many people live where. For example, how many vaccines are needed in a community, where polling stations should be placed for elections or who might be in danger as a hurricane approaches. The answers rely on population data.

    But counting people is getting harder.

    For centuries, census and household surveys have been the backbone of population knowledge. But we’ve just returned from the UN’s statistical commission meetings in New York, where experts reported that something alarming is happening to population data systems globally.

    Census response rates are declining in many countries, resulting in large margins of error. The 2020 US census undercounted America’s Latino population by more than three times the rate of the 2010 census. In Paraguay, the latest census revealed a population one-fifth smaller than previously thought.

    South Africa’s 2022 census post-enumeration survey revealed a likely undercount of more than 30%. According to the UN Economic Commission for Africa, undercounts and census delays due to COVID-19, conflict or financial limitations have resulted in an estimated one in three Africans not being counted in the 2020 census round.

    When people vanish from data, they vanish from policy. When certain groups are systematically undercounted – often minorities, rural communities or poorer people – they become invisible to policymakers. This translates directly into political underrepresentation and inadequate resource allocation.

    As the Brookings Institution, a US research organisation, has highlighted, undercounts have “cost communities of colour political representation over the next decade”.

    This is happening because several factors have converged. Trust in government institutions is eroding worldwide, with the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) reporting that by late 2023, 44% of people across member countries had low or no trust in their national governments. Research shows a clear trend of declining trust specifically in representative institutions like parliaments and governments. This makes people less likely to respond to government-issued census requests.

    The COVID-19 pandemic created logistical nightmares for census takers. Many countries had to postpone their censuses. Budget cuts to statistical offices reduced capacity, while countries struggled with recruiting field staff.

    International funding for population data is also disappearing. The US-funded Demographic and Health Surveys program, which provided vital survey data across 90 countries for four decades, was terminated in February 2025. Unicef’s Multi-Indicator Cluster program, which carries out household surveys, faces an uncertain future amid shrinking global aid budgets. US government cuts to support for UN agencies and development banks undertaking census support will likely have further impacts.

    This is incredibly worrying to us as geography academics, because gathering accurate population data is fundamentally about making everyone visible. As population scientists Sabrina Juran and Arona Pistiner wrote, this information allows governments to plan for the future of a country and its people.

    The US census directly impacts the allocation of more than US$1.5 trillion (£1.2 trillion) in public resources each year. How can governments distribute healthcare funding without knowing who lives where? How can disaster response be effective if vulnerable populations are invisible in official population counts?

    Solutions that count

    Countries are adapting. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the transition to alternative census methodologies. Many countries turned to online questionnaires, telephone interviews and administrative data sources to reduce face-to-face interactions.

    The UN Economic Commission for Africa recommends that countries move from using paper forms for census data collection and embrace new digital technologies that can be cheaper and more reliable. Turkey’s switch in 2011 reduced census costs from US$48.3 million to US$13.9 million while improving data quality and timeliness, and nearly 80% of countries used tablets or smartphones for data collection in the 2020 round of censuses.

    Collecting census data digitally in Pakistan in 2023.
    Abdul Rauf Khan/Shutterstock

    At WorldPop, our research group at the University of Southampton, we’re also helping governments to develop solutions using new technologies. Buildings mapped from satellite imagery using AI, together with counts of populations from small areas, can help create detailed population estimates to support census implementation or provide estimates for undersurveyed areas.

    As we face growing challenges, from climate change to economic inequality, having accurate, reliable and robust population data isn’t a luxury. It’s essential for a functioning society. National statistical offices, UN agencies, academics, the private sector and donors must urgently focus on how to build cost-effective solutions to provide reliable and robust population data, especially in resource-poor settings where recent cuts will be felt hardest.

    When people disappear from the data, they risk disappearing from public policy too. Making everyone count starts with counting everyone.


    Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

    Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 40,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.


    Andrew J Tatem works for the University of Southampton, and is Director of WorldPop. His research on mapping populations has been funded by donors such as the Gates Foundation, Wellcome Trust, GAVI.

    Jessica Espey works for the University of Southampton. Her research on data, statistics and evidence use has previously been funded by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, Gates Foundation and others.

    – ref. Global population data is in crisis – here’s why that matters – https://theconversation.com/global-population-data-is-in-crisis-heres-why-that-matters-251751

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Britons increasingly trust each other – but trust in politicians has slumped since the pandemic

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Ben Seyd, Senior Lecturer in Politics, University of Kent

    ITS/Shutterstock

    One surprise in the early days of the pandemic was people’s increased willingness to trust political authorities. According to the British Social Attitudes survey (BSA), the proportion of people trusting government ministers rose from 15% in 2019 to 23% in 2020. Data from Ipsos MORI showed a similar bounce for trust in government ministers and politicians in 2021. Trust in government was also a significant factor in whether people complied with lockdown rules and other restrictions.

    Since then, however, people’s trust in government has plummeted. The latest BSA survey finds that, in 2023, just 14% of the population said they trust government “always” or “most of the time”. Fully 45% of the population trust government “almost never”. These are the most negative set of figures since the BSA began asking questions on trust almost four decades ago.

    This collapse in trust is perhaps unsurprising given the various government shenanigans over the past few years, notably Boris Johnson’s Downing Street lockdown parties and Liz Truss’s disastrous prime ministerial tenure. However, there is also evidence that Britons have become less trusting as a result of dashed expectations over the benefits of Brexit, negative views of government performance in areas like health, and cost of living pressures.

    Yet while Britons are less trusting of those with political authority, they appear to be more trusting in each other. Back in 1999, 29% of the population believed that “most people [in Britain] can be trusted”. Four decades on, that proportion has increased to 46%, topping the previous high of 43% in 1981. This might partly reflect the sense of collective endeavour and neighbourliness that was instilled during the pandemic, when we were encouraged to look out for, and help, other people. There is also evidence that, while people see the country as a whole as becoming more divided, at the local level perceptions of unity outweigh perceptions of division.

    This is a welcome shift, particularly since trust in other people is associated with a range of positive outcomes, including support for international cooperation and international organisations. In an uncertain and dangerous world, social trust may be an important factor shaping the willingness of states to work together.

    Wellbeing of politicians

    The decline of popular trust in government and politicians is concerning. Low trust is associated with support for populist politicians such as Donald Trump and upheavals like Brexit. Low trust could also significantly compromise public acceptance of, and compliance with, official messages and rules in a future pandemic.

    Distrust can also cause direct harm to public figures. As one of us (James) has shown, politicians are generally poor estimators of public trust in themselves. But where they do perceive widespread distrust, often because of repeated experiences of physical or online abuse and intimidation, this has a significant negative effect on their mental health and wellbeing.

    Messages of kindness and community around London during lockdown.
    Alex Yeung/Shutterstock

    Increased security around MPs – the cost of which jumped from £77,234.67 to £4,381,733.40 between 2014 and 2022 – is likely to protect them from the worst excesses of public distrust where it trickles over into extreme behaviour. Yet given the importance of contact for people’s trust, it could also inadvertently fuel more cynicism by increasing the physical distance between politicians and the public.

    The public’s declining regard for politicians and government should be a source of concern. We are hardly likely to recruit the calibre of politician we expect (and need), or indeed encourage a more diverse population of aspiring representatives, if the personal costs of holding elected office are so high.

    At the same time, a look at the bigger picture offers some reassurance. As one of us (Ben) has recently shown, there is little evidence that low trust induces popular scepticism towards democracy itself, or that it weakens public support for state spending or government programmes in key areas like healthcare.

    Trust on the frontline

    The nature and strength of Britain’s civic ties are revealed not only in our trust of politicians and institutions, but also in how we treat the people who provide public services, such as police officers and health workers.

    On the face of it, the picture is not pretty. Over the past few years, rates of public abuse towards frontline service providers have increased. In 2021, 18% of teachers reported having experienced verbal abuse from a parent or carer in the past year. In 2023, that figure had risen to 30%.

    A survey of police officers in 2022 found that 37% had experienced verbal insults at least once a week over the past year. This was an increase from the 29% of officers who reported a similar level of insults in 2020, although the figure dropped slightly in 2023 to 34%.

    Rates of physical abuse of London ambulance staff have more than doubled in four years, with 346 incidents recorded in 2019, increasing to 728 incidents in 2023. A similar picture of public abuse is found for frontline workers in the health service. Polling in 2023 found that 85% of GPs across the UK had received verbal abuse from members of the public during the past year. A 2021 survey by the British Medical Association found more than half of GPs, and one in five hospital doctors, had experienced verbal abuse in the past month.

    While majorities of the British public express trust in many frontline workers such as nurses and doctors (who currently attract 94% and 88% trust ratings), others appear to take a more negative view, extending even to abusive behaviour.

    Given the range of service providers facing such rising antipathy, it seems unlikely that the trigger for this was the pandemic. A better clue is provided by longer-term data on public treatment of doctors.

    Responses are to a survey question reading ‘In the last 12 months, have you personally experienced harassment, bullying or abuse at work from patients, their relatives or members of the public?’.
    Author provided, data from NHS Staff Survey

    NHS survey figures show that rates of abuse towards doctors declined between 2003 and 2011. (The wording of the relevant survey question changed in 2012, which restricts our ability to compare the more recent data). This was precisely the period when resources were pumped into the health service and public satisfaction with the NHS increased. This suggests that public interactions with frontline service workers like doctors are strongly shaped by the quality of the service they face.

    Indeed, GPs themselves ascribe the verbal abuse they and their staff experience to people’s dissatisfaction with the service, including discontent with access to health services. One underappreciated effect of austerity might thus be an increased public frustration with healthcare workers, which on occasion appears to extend to outright abuse.

    More accessible (read: better funded) public services might reduce some negativity towards frontline service workers. However, the important task of rebuilding people’s trust in politicians is – particularly given the negative coverage by much of Britain’s media – likely to be a trickier task.

    James Weinberg receives funding from the Economic and Social Research Council.

    Ben Seyd does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Britons increasingly trust each other – but trust in politicians has slumped since the pandemic – https://theconversation.com/britons-increasingly-trust-each-other-but-trust-in-politicians-has-slumped-since-the-pandemic-252762

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: When Canadian snowbirds don’t flock south, the costs are more than financial

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Valorie A. Crooks, Professor, Department of Geography, Simon Fraser University

    Every winter, hundreds of thousands of older Canadians spend the winter in the United States. But in recent weeks, we’ve seen many Canadian snowbirds shifting their attention to other matters.

    First, stories started to emerge from those who said they would no longer participate in this seasonal migration because of political events in the U.S. Another related concern was the weakened Canadian dollar. This trend has prompted some to consider selling their winter properties in the U.S.

    More recently, attention has shifted to the potential for changed border rules to lessen snowbirds’ access to the U.S. for long stays. Snowbirds are concerned about administrative and procedural requirements that may ultimately make cross-border travel less convenient.

    During the COVID-19 pandemic, some Canadian snowbirds experienced challenges crossing into the U.S. for the winter or returning to Canada. Closures of borders to non-essential travel did not dissuade some from planning to winter in the U.S.

    Drawing on research in snowbird communities, we found out that affordability and ease of movement are two important enablers of long-stay seasonal travel.

    Because of this, it’s not surprising that we’re hearing from snowbirds again in light of recent developments.

    CBC News reports on Québec snowbirds reaction to the Donald Trump administration’s new measures for travellers to the U.S.

    Economic and political disruptions

    While COVID-era travel disruptions didn’t stop some snowbirds from going south for the winter, the current economic and political disruptions are another story. Florida is a popular destination for Canadian snowbirds. In fact, a 2023 survey named eight of the 10 best American destination communities as being in Florida.

    If Canadian snowbirds are talking about cancelling travel plans and selling properties, people in Florida should be paying attention.

    Instead, in early March, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis downplayed what it would mean for Canadians to avoid travel to the state. Citing a recent tourism industry report, he noted that only 3.3 million of the 142.9 million visitors to Florida in 2024 were from Canada.

    DeSantis went on to say “that’s not much of a boycott, in my book.” But 91.5 per cent of Florida’s annual visitors were from the U.S. This means that the 2.3 per cent of visitors who were Canadian were actually a substantial portion of the states’s international visitors.

    DeSantis’s recent comments were also not in line with concerns raised during the COVID-19 pandemic that signalled substantial negative economic impacts for the state if Canadian snowbirds did not arrive for the winter.

    Community members

    Aside from these economic impacts, something we’ve learned through our years of research with Canadians who winter in the U.S. is that many become vital members of destination communities. From participating in public health outreach programs to volunteering at local hospitals, our research has shown that many embrace opportunities to be active in the places they reside for the winter.

    Any drop in the numbers of seasonal travellers going to U.S. destinations will have social costs for communities beyond the quantifiable economic losses.

    Many popular U.S. destination communities for snowbirds have health systems that are designed to expand and retract with dramatically different seasonal populations. Our research has observed this most closely in Yuma, Ariz., where entire areas of the main local hospital are closed in the summer and staffed seasonally in the winter.

    Additionally, some of the seasonal nursing staff who arrive for the winter are from Canada. Any retreat from these destinations by Canadian snowbirds may have significant implications for health systems and allied sectors. This can ultimately impact the quality of care they can provide to a more limited local patient base.

    Intangible impacts

    While the economic impacts of the seeming loss of long-stay older Canadians in these communities are important to consider, there will be other — less measurable but no less important — impacts. Just as the long friendship between the U.S. and Canada is now being tested, blended snowbird communities of older North Americans are at risk of diminishing.

    Business owners in U.S. destinations spoke up about losses when fewer Canadian snowbirds went south during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some Canadian business sectors and communities discovered opportunities emerging from these shifts in consumer’ movements.

    As snowbirds debate whether to navigate new border complexities and return to the U.S. next winter, we must be attentive to the stories behind the numbers to understand the true impacts of their decisions. And as comments made by DeSantis and other politicians have made clear, Canadian snowbirds are now faced with new economic and emotional considerations.

    Valorie A. receives funding from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada, BC Women’s Health Research Institute and MITACS.

    Jeremy Snyder receives funding from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

    – ref. When Canadian snowbirds don’t flock south, the costs are more than financial – https://theconversation.com/when-canadian-snowbirds-dont-flock-south-the-costs-are-more-than-financial-252125

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Dinewise, Inc. (DWIS) Releases New Corporate Structure

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Dinewise files for Name Change and negotiates with Acquisition Targets

    ATLANTA, GA, March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Dinewise, Inc (OTC PINK-DWIS) (referred to as “Dinewise”, “we”, “us”, “our” or the “Company”) A leading national technology conglomerate specializing in automotive, fintech, and entertainment solutions officially announces its rebranding and strategic acquisition targets today. 

    The Dinewise Board of Directors has approved a corporate name change, which is currently being filed with the State of Nevada. The company will now be known as Superstar Platforms, Inc. (“Superstar”), in honor of its patriarch, Mel Farr, Sr., who was widely recognized as the Superstar Dealer. Mel Farr, Sr. embodied the American Dream, rising from humble beginnings in Beaumont, Texas, to becoming the largest African American business in the country during the 1990s. He was a pioneer in the automotive and retail industries, creating opportunities for countless others. His iconic jingle, “Mel Farr, the Superstar, for a Farr Better Deal,” still resonates with many, even decades later.

    Superstar Platforms will serve as the parent company that owns and controls a diversified portfolio of subsidiaries across various industries. Growth will primarily be driven through strategic acquisitions. The company is finalizing its negotiations with TitlePal, a fintech company that has developed an innovative online solution for Title Pawn transactions, and anticipates closing the acquisition in Q2/ 2025 with minimal shareholder dilution. Additionally, Superstar is in advanced discussions to become the exclusive North American distributor for a multinational automotive company.

    PawnTrust, the company’s specialized marketplace for pawn shops, will now operate as a subsidiary of Superstar. The platform is scheduled to launch in June 2025.

    “My father frequently quoted Lucius Annaeus Seneca, saying, ‘If a man does not know to which port he sails, no wind is favorable.’ The corporate structure we’ve built serves as the foundation for our success. With this structure in place, we can intensely drive our initiatives forward,” Michael Farr, Chief Executive Officer.

    Superstar Platforms, Inc. is now positioned to file a registration statement, moving swiftly toward becoming a fully SEC-reporting company.

    About Superstar Platforms

    Superstar Platforms, a leading national technology conglomerate, owns PawnTrust— a specialized marketplace designed exclusively for the approximately 11,000 pawn shops across the country. The online marketplace (www.pawntrust.com) digitizes the inventory using advanced image recognition algorithms to automate item descriptions of the participating pawn shops and markets them on a national scale. The marketplace contains cutting-edge technology that streamlines the borrowing, buying, and bartering transactions typically found at a pawn shop. The platform plans to leverage Artificial Intelligence (AI) to optimize pricing, reduce fraud, and create personalized search recommendations to enhance the customer’s experience. These enhancements let consumers experience a frictionless shopping experience on their mobile app that gives them instant access to this nationwide inventory of pawn shops. Not only does this provide a more efficient way for consumers to shop, eliminating the need to visit multiple stores, but it also amplifies the reach of individual pawn shop owners. By joining the PawnTrust- ‘Pawn Partners’ network, shop owners gain access to a broader audience, enhancing their visibility and sales opportunities. This innovative approach aligns customer convenience with business growth, reshaping how people interact with the pawn industry. Consumers that purchase items outside of their local area will have their items conveniently shipped to them. As the intermediary in each transaction, PawnTrust earns a fee on every item sold in the marketplace. Many of these local pawn shops lack an online presence or the capital to market their inventory on a national scale. By bridging this gap, PawnTrust opens up opportunities for incremental sales from a wider buying base, effectively transforming the pawn shop and micro-lending industries. This model not only supports local businesses but also extends their reach, driving growth and innovation within the market.” 

    Forward-Looking Information

    This release includes statements that may constitute ”forward-looking” statements, usually containing the words ”believe,” ”estimate,” ”project,” ”expect” or similar expressions. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. While the Company believes the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurances such expectations will prove to be accurate. Security holders are cautioned such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Certain factors may cause results to differ materially from those anticipated by the forward-looking statements made in this release. Factors that would cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, acceptance of the Company’s current and future products and services in the marketplace, the ability of the Company to develop effective new products and receive regulatory approvals of such products, competitive factors, dependence upon third-party vendors, risks and uncertainties related to the current unknown duration and severity of the COVID-19 pandemic and other risks detailed in the Company’s periodic report filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. By making these forward-looking statements, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this release.

    Investor Relations:
    Resources Unlimited
    718-269-3366
    mike@resourcesunlimitedllc.com

    The MIL Network –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Frankfort Company Pays More Than $3.8 Million to Resolve Improper Paycheck Protection Program Loan

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    FRANKFORT, Ky. – A Frankfort-based steel wheel manufacturer, Topy America, Inc., agreed to pay the United States $3,840,188.19 to resolve allegations that it improperly obtained a Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan from the U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) for which it was not eligible.

    Congress created the PPP in March 2020 to provide emergency financial assistance to small American businesses struggling to pay employees and other expenses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Under the PPP, eligible small businesses could receive forgivable loans guaranteed by the SBA. When applying for PPP loans, borrowers were required to certify that they were eligible for the requested loans and that the information they provided was true and accurate. Regulations provided various eligibility requirements for the PPP, including limitations on the number of employees.

    The settlement resolves allegations that Topy America falsely certified it was eligible to apply for and receive forgiveness of a second-draw PPP loan.  In January 2021, Topy America applied for a second-draw PPP loan for $2,000,000, representing that it had fewer than 300 employees. The government contends that, together with its foreign affiliates, Topy America had more than 300 employees and was therefore ineligible for that loan. Based on its false certification, Topy America received the loan and ultimately received forgiveness of the loan. Topy America cooperated with the United States’ investigation and agreed to compensate the United States for its error.

    “Our office is committed to holding accountable businesses and individuals who improperly obtained COVID-19 relief funds,” said Acting U.S. Attorney Paul McCaffrey. “Topy America quickly and responsibly addressed the concerns raised by the United States, and we expect that other PPP recipients who did not follow the applicable rules will do the same.”

    The Government’s work in this investigation illustrates its commitment to combatting COVID-19 fraud. The United States encourages anyone with information about potential fraud involving COVID-19 to report it by calling the Department of Justice’s National Center for Disaster Fraud (NCDF) Hotline at 866-720-5721 or via the NCDF Web Complaint Form at: https://www.justice.gov/disaster-fraud/ncdf-disaster-complaint-form. PPP recipients also may voluntarily disclose self-discovered evidence of fraud involving the PPP to U.S. Attorney’s Offices.

    The settlement resolves lawsuits brought by private citizens under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act.  Under those provisions, a private party can file a civil action on behalf of the United States, thereby bringing allegations of fraud to the Government’s attention, and share in any financial recovery.  As part of this resolution, the individuals who filed the qui tam complaints are eligible to receive a portion of the settlement proceeds.  The civil cases are captioned United States ex rel. GNGH2 Inc. v. Topy America, Inc., Case No. 3:24-cv-0003-GFVT and United States ex rel. Blockquote, Inc. v. Topy America, Inc., Case No. 3:24-cv-0028.

    This matter was handled by Assistant U.S. Attorney Meghan Stubblebine, with assistance from the SBA’s Office of General Counsel. The claims resolved by the settlement are allegations only; there has been no determination of liability.

    – END –

    MIL Security OSI –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Mississippi’s education miracle: A model for global literacy reform

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Harry Anthony Patrinos, Professor of Education Policy, University of Arkansas

    Mississippi’s reforms have led to significant gains in reading and math, despite the state being one of the lowest spenders per pupil in the U.S. Klaus Vedfelt/Getty Images

    In a surprising turnaround, Mississippi, once ranked near the bottom of U.S. education standings, has dramatically improved its student literacy rates.

    As of 2023, the state ranks among the top 20 for fourth grade reading, a significant leap from its 49th-place ranking in 2013. This transformation was driven by evidence-based policy reforms focused on early literacy and teacher development.

    The rest of the country might want to take note.

    That’s because Mississippi’s success offers a proven solution to the reading literacy crisis facing many states – a clear road map for closing early literacy gaps and improving reading outcomes nationwide.

    As an expert on the economics of education, I believe the learning crisis is not just an educational issue. It’s also economic.

    When students struggle, their academic performance declines. And that leads to lower test scores. Research shows that these declining scores are closely linked to reduced economic growth, as a less educated workforce hampers productivity and innovation.

    The Mississippi approach

    In 2013, Mississippi implemented a multifaceted strategy for enhancing kindergarten to third grade literacy. The Literacy-Based Promotion Act focuses on early literacy and teacher development. It includes teacher training in proven reading instruction methods and teacher coaching.

    Relying on federally supported research from the Institute of Education Science, the state invested in phonics, fluency, vocabulary and reading comprehension. The law provided K-3 teachers with training and support to help students master reading by the end of third grade.

    It includes provisions for reading coaches, parent communication, individual reading plans and other supportive measures. It also includes targeted support for struggling readers. Students repeat the third grade if they fail to meet reading standards.

    The state also aligned its test to the NAEP, or National Assessment of Educational Progress, something which not all states do. Often referred to as “The Nation’s Report Card,” the NAEP is a nationwide assessment that measures student performance in various subjects.

    Mississippi’s reforms have led to significant gains in reading and math, with fourth graders improving on national assessments.

    I believe this is extremely important. That’s because early reading is a foundational skill that helps develop the ability to read at grade level by the end of third grade. It also leads to general academic success, graduating from high school prepared for college, and becoming productive adults less likely to fall into poverty.

    Research by Noah Spencer, an economics doctoral student at the University of Toronto, shows that the Mississippi law boosted scores.

    Students exposed to it from kindergarten to the third grade gained a 0.25 standard deviation improvement in reading scores. That is roughly equivalent to one year of academic progress in reading, according to educational benchmarks. This gain reflects significant strides in students’ literacy development over the course of a school year.

    Another study has found an even greater impact attributed to grade retention in the third grade – it led to a huge increase in learning in English Language Arts by the sixth grade.

    But the Mississippi law is not just about retention. Spencer found that grade retention explains only about 22% of the treatment effect. The rest is presumably due to the other components of the measure – namely, teacher training and coaching.

    Other previous research supports these results across the country.

    Adopting an early literacy policy improves elementary students’ reading achievement on important student assessments, with third grade retention and instructional support substantially enhancing English learners’ skills. The policy also increases test scores for students’ younger siblings, although it is not clear why.

    Moreover, third grade retention programs immediately boost English Language Arts and math achievements into middle school without disciplinary incidents or negatively impacting student attendance.

    These changes were achieved despite Mississippi being one of the lowest spenders per pupil in the U.S., proving that strategic investments in teacher development and early literacy can yield impressive results even with limited resources.

    The global learning crisis

    Mississippi’s success is timely. Millions of children globally struggle to read by age 10. It’s a crisis that has worsened after the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Mississippi’s early literacy interventions show lasting impact and offer a potential solution for other regions facing similar challenges.

    In 2024, only 31% of U.S. fourth grade students were proficient or above in reading, according to the NAEP, while 40% were below basic. Reading scores for fourth and eighth graders also dropped by five points compared with 2019, with averages lower than any year since 2005.

    In 2013, Mississippi ranked 49th in fourth grade reading scores.
    Klaus Vedfelt/Getty Images

    Mississippi’s literacy program provides a learning gain equal to a year of schooling. The program costs US$15 million annually – 0.2% of the state budget in 2023 – and $32 per student.

    The learning gain associated with the Mississippi program is equal to about an extra quarter of a year. Since each year of schooling raises earnings by about 9%, then a quarter-year gain means that Mississippi students benefiting from the program will increase future earnings by 2.25% a year.

    Based on typical high school graduate earnings, the average student can expect to earn an extra $1,000 per year for the rest of their life.

    That is, for every dollar Mississippi spends, the state gains about $32 in additional lifetime earnings, offering substantial long-term economic benefits compared with the initial cost.

    The Mississippi literacy project focuses on teaching at the right level, which focuses on assessing children’s actual learning levels and then tailoring instruction to meet them, rather than strictly following age- or grade-level curriculum.

    Teaching at the right level and a scripted lessons plan are among the most effective strategies to address the global learning crisis. After the World Bank reviewed over 150 education programs in 2020, nearly half showed no learning benefit.

    I believe Mississippi’s progress, despite being the second-poorest state, can serve as a wake-up call.

    Harry Anthony Patrinos does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Mississippi’s education miracle: A model for global literacy reform – https://theconversation.com/mississippis-education-miracle-a-model-for-global-literacy-reform-251895

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: First American Bank Celebrates American Exchanger Services’ SBA Wisconsin 2025 Small Business Exporter of the Year Award

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MILWAUKEE, March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — First American Bank proudly congratulates American Exchanger Services for being named the Small Business Administration (SBA) Wisconsin 2025 Small Business Exporter of the Year. This prestigious award recognizes the company’s impressive international growth and resilience in overcoming global challenges, proving that strategic financial support can lead to extraordinary success.

    The journey of American Exchanger Services is a remarkable tale of recovery. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the company faced severe disruptions to their contracts and struggled with strained finances and mounting debt. Rather than surrender, they reached out to First American Bank in 2023, seeking the support needed to turn things around.

    In response, First American Bank provided a tailored financial solution. Recognizing the potential for recovery through their returning foreign contracts, the bank offered an SBA Export Express Line of Credit to address immediate working capital needs. Additionally, First American Bank consolidated the company’s debt and refinanced real estate through the SBA International Trade Loan (ITL), stabilizing cash flow and setting the stage for profitability.

    “The strength of any business lies not just in its ability to survive, but in its ability to rebound, adapt, and grow in the face of adversity,” said Randy Sherwood, First Vice President, Commercial Banking at First American Bank. “American Exchanger Services’ recovery is a testament to their tenacity and the power of having the right financial partner at the right moment. We’re proud to have played a pivotal role in their journey and look forward to their continued success as they expand globally.”

    Today, American Exchanger Services has not only recovered but is thriving. The company’s operations have expanded, their footprint in international markets has grown, and their ability to meet customer demand has soared. Their success story underscores the importance of strategic financial solutions, especially for businesses navigating the complexities of global trade.

    “At First American Bank, we view our role as not just a lender, but a partner in our clients’ success stories,” said James Matteson, First Vice President, SBA Program Manager at First American Bank. “American Exchanger Services’ achievement highlights the critical role of tailored financial solutions and the resilience of businesses that innovate in challenging times. We’re excited for what the future holds as they continue to break barriers in international trade.”

    First American Bank is honored to have played a key role in helping American Exchanger Services recover, rebuild, and thrive. This SBA recognition is a powerful reminder of how strategic financing can transform challenges into growth opportunities, fueling continued success in even the most difficult times.

    Additionally, First American Bank is proud to have been recognized as the SBA Export Lender of the Year for Wisconsin, further affirming the bank’s commitment to supporting local businesses in their global expansion efforts.

    At First American Bank, we are dedicated to helping small businesses grow both locally and internationally. American Exchanger Services is just one example of the immense potential small businesses have when given the right tools, resources, and support. We look forward to their continued expansion and are excited to continue partnering with them as they reach new heights.

    Here’s to American Exchanger Services’ ongoing success and growth in the global marketplace.

    For more information about First American Bank and how we help businesses unlock their potential, visit www.firstambank.com.

    First American Bank is a Member FDIC.

    Contact:
    Teresa Lee
    305-631-6400

    The MIL Network –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Address to the National Press Club, Canberra

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Here we are, back again on Ngunnawal land, gathering at the kind invitation of Maurice and the Board, sponsors and members of the National Press Club.

    But since last time, not just one new President but 2: Trump; and Connell.

    Congratulations Tom on your election, and thanks for your introduction –

    And to everyone here, including the pundits and, on recent form, maybe a couple of protesters again too.

    Last night marked the first time since Ben Chifley was PM and Treasurer, more than 3 quarters of a century ago, that there’ve been 4 budgets in a single term.

    And of the 11 times I’ve spoken here, I think it’s the 4 post‑Budget opportunities I’ve cherished the most.

    Partly because Laura Chalmers comes along, and is here again, she brought Leo last night, and that means a lot to me.

    And also, because they offer us the chance to go behind the Budget a bit, to provide some more of the colour and context.

    Today I want to talk about how our economy is turning a corner, even as global conditions take a turn for the worse.

    Explain how seismic changes in the world validate and vindicate our strategy, rather than undermine it.

    And lay out our government’s economic case for re‑election –

    Based on our progress to here, our plans from here, and the risks posed by our opponents.

    The fourth shock

    First let me sketch the backdrop.

    Twenty years ago, I fronted up for my first of 19 Budget lockups.

    Costello was Treasurer, and the global economy was a very different place.

    In the 2 decades since, half a dozen subsequent Treasurers presided over 3 big economic shocks.

    The first, a financial crisis that became a demand shock.

    The second, a pandemic that became a supply shock.

    The third, an inflationary shock that lingers around the world longer than anyone hoped.

    Escalating trade tensions now risk, if not represent, the fourth big economic shock in just 17 years.

    Now, if you think about the big post‑war global economic story.

    From Bretton Woods in 1945, to the high inflation of the 70s.

    The Washington Consensus that held from the end of the Cold War until the start of the GFC.

    There’s a tendency to talk about economic shocks as punctuation. A break in the flow.

    But the last 20 years prove that global shocks – in one form or another – are chapters in their own right.

    They no longer interrupt the story – they are the story.

    Acknowledgements

    Governing a country like ours in uncertain times like these is a responsibility we accept and an opportunity we cherish.

    Led by the Prime Minister – who is here today.

    His collaborative style of leadership is appreciated by all of us in his team.

    Katy and I told the Cabinet yesterday that we consider ourselves very fortunate to have been so well‑supported by so many ministers, a number of them here today and I thank and acknowledge them again.

    And no Treasurer has ever been more fortunate than me when it comes to the Finance Minister.

    The best colleague I’ve ever had.

    Nothing we’ve done over the course of 4 Budgets would be possible without her calm and composure, her empathy and judgement.

    Katy came to the Treasury thank you dinner on Thursday night.

    I’m told that’s unprecedented – but for us it’s not unusual.

    I’m sure Katy would agree it’s not the most glamorous ritual.

    The pile of pide boxes and a sea of tired eyes sums up the week, and weeks, before.

    But it gives us a chance to say thanks to Steven, Jenny, Glyn and all the officials involved in putting this Budget together.

    That evening, I was reflecting with officials on the time I spent as a public servant, working for Glyn in Queensland.

    He was the first to tell me what it looked like inside the Cabinet Room here in Parliament House.

    Right down to the framed paintings of Australian lorikeets on the walls.

    Those birds have seen and heard a lot!

    I’m told I’ve spent 664 hours in that room this term – which is about 27 days.

    Whenever I’m in there, I try to remember that’s it’s not the birds in the frame or the galahs in the pet shop that really matter.

    We try to ensure those conversations around the cabinet table are shaped by the conversations Australians are having around the kitchen table.

    We know cost of living is front of mind for most Australians and that’s why it’s been front and centre in all 4 budgets.

    No matter how difficult or long the deliberations might be in that room I’m always aware how lucky we are to be in there.

    Treasurers stand there on Budget night on behalf of all who do so much to put our plans into Budgets, and into action.

    ERC ministers who undertake the essential deliberations – 233 of those 664 cabinet room hours were with them.

    Every member of our caucus who all do so much to advocate for the people they represent.

    The staff from our offices and all the public servants.

    Please join me in thanking them.

    Turning a corner

    This Budget makes it clear that the Australian economy is emerging from a global cost‑of‑living crisis in better shape than anywhere else.

    Inflation is down, living standards are rising, real incomes are growing, unemployment is low, interest rates are coming down, debt is down and now growth is gathering pace.

    That combination is exceptional – and not accidental.

    It is the product of the choices we have made.

    Delivering cost‑of‑living relief for every Australian.

    Strengthening Medicare and the services people count on.

    And building a Future Made in Australia.

    The 2 weeks leading into the Budget made clear just how important and urgent this work has been.

    The human and economic costs of Tropical Cyclone Alfred.

    Coming so soon after widespread flooding in north and far north Queensland – with more damaging heavy rains there just last week.

    And now, fresh turmoil in the world – part of this fourth shock.

    All of this vindicates the course we chose 3 years ago.

    And validates the choices we made together.

    Economic case for re‑election

    This is where I want to pay tribute to the Prime Minister.

    The leader Australians see standing with emergency services in disasters brings the same decency to every challenge confronting our nation.

    Anthony’s leadership is defined by his compassion, his optimism – and his determination.

    And he will make our case for re‑election to the Australian people with those same qualities and commitment.

    This election will be about the strong foundations we have laid, the better future we are building – and the risk of our opponents wrecking it all.

    It will be a referendum on Medicare.

    A simple choice between Labor cutting taxes and helping with the cost of living –

    And Peter Dutton’s secret cuts which will make Australians worse off.

    Because he wants to cut everything except income taxes for workers.

    Above all else it will be an election about the economy.

    Labor’s economic case for a second term has 3 parts:

    The progress we have made together in the economy and repairing the budget.

    The work we are doing and the economic plan we are implementing – to boost wages, rebuild living standards, and make our economy more resilient, more competitive and more productive.

    And the deliberate threat and significant danger that the Coalition pose if they form the next government.

    Reason one: progress

    The economic progress documented in the Budget last night belongs to every Australian.

    It’s all the more remarkable against a backdrop of extreme global uncertainty.

    To give you a sense of that, take inflation.

    In the most recent quarterly data, inflation sits at 2.4 per cent – and just now, today’s monthly reading came in the same.

    On election night, in May of 2022, inflation was more than double that and rising.

    So when I stood here after our first Budget in October that year, inflation was nearly triple what it is today.

    In that first Budget, we were talking about how far we had to go together.

    Today, we can point to how far we’ve come.

    We have brought inflation down while encouraging a broader recovery in our economy, now well underway.

    Our fiscal policy helped break the back of inflation when it was at its peak.

    It adjusted to support growth and preserve employment, as inflation came down.

    And we’ve delivered responsible cost‑of‑living relief that has directly taken the pressure off prices.

    Because of this a soft landing is coming into view –

    With growth rebounding, living standards recovering, and the private sector playing a larger role.

    The last financial year saw the highest level of business investment in over a decade.

    Four in every 5 of the million jobs created have been in the private sector.

    25,000 new businesses created each month this term – the highest average on record.

    Real wages and living standards rising again.

    While the gender pay gap is at near record lows and unemployment is at around 4 per cent.

    Treasury expects employment growth this year will be stronger, inflation will come down faster, and participation will stay near its record high for longer compared with the mid‑year update.

    So, our economy isn’t just growing faster, it’s growing in a way which will be stronger, more sustainable and more inclusive too.

    All this, while successfully steering towards a stunning improvement in our fiscal position.

    We inherited a mess and we’re cleaning it up.

    The budget bottom line is $207 billion better off on our watch.

    This is the biggest ever nominal improvement in a single term.

    Turning $135 billion of Liberal deficits into surpluses worth $38 billion – the first back‑to‑back surpluses in 2 decades.

    Almost halving the deficit we inherited for this financial year.

    And improving the budget position every year of the forward estimates, compared to PEFO.

    All this is a deliberate result of our responsibility and restraint.

    Banking the vast majority of revenue upgrades – around 7 of every 10 dollars.

    Restraining spending growth to 1.7 per cent – less than half the average under our predecessors.

    Finding almost $95 billion of savings – more this term than they managed over their last 2 combined, with precisely zero in their last Budget.

    Making real structural reform to secure the future of aged care and the National Disability Insurance Scheme.

    Guaranteeing the choice, dignity and security they bring to millions of Australians.

    And tackling high and rising interest costs.

    Just after coming to government, they were forecast to grow by 14.4 per cent per year.

    After 3 years of responsibility and restraint we’ve managed to cut that to 9.5 per cent.

    A big part of this story is our decision to return the vast majority of revenue upgrades to the bottom line.

    Not only has this improved the budget position by around $250 billion dollars to 2028–29.

    It means we will save about $112 billion in interest payments over the medium term.

    Reason 2: plans

    We don’t see the substantial progress we’ve made on the budget as an end in itself.

    Repairing the budget and rebuilding living standards go hand in hand.

    Our responsible approach has made room for the 5 main priorities of this Budget.

    Helping with the cost of living.

    Strengthening Medicare.

    Building more homes.

    Investing in every stage of education.

    And making our economy stronger, more productive, and more resilient.

    These are essential components of our economic plan.

    To strengthen our resilience in uncertain times.

    To create a more dynamic, competitive economy.

    And to rebuild incomes and living standards.

    Rebuilding living standards

    In this Budget we’re delivering more cost‑of‑living relief for Australians when it’s needed.

    Extending energy bill relief.

    Funding wage increases for care workers.

    Making medicines cheaper.

    Relieving student debt.

    And lowering taxes for every taxpayer.

    The combined benefit for an average household will be more than $15,000 from our 3 rounds of tax cuts and energy bill relief alone.

    Substantial relief while also building the earning capacity of Australians for the future too.

    By improving access to education – so that every Australian gets the chance to work in the jobs of the future.

    By investing in Medicare and expanding bulk billing – minimising out of pocket health costs and time out of work.

    And by moving towards universal early childhood education – so that parents can work more, if they want to.

    These parts of our plan to rebuild living standards are distinct but interlinked.

    Take our tax cut top‑up – a modest but meaningful addition to the tax cuts we’re rolling out already.

    The average annual tax cut, after this year’s and next year’s, is $2,548 or about $50 a week.

    Our tax cuts will:

    Boost incomes by 1.9 per cent within 2 years.

    Support the private sector recovery.

    Increase participation by more than 1.3 million hours –

    With Treasury estimating that 900,000 of these hours will be taken up by women.

    And give people a better start in their careers with the average young worker receiving a tax cut more than twice the size they would have under the Coalition.

    So, our tax cuts provide immediate relief while also boosting participation, aspiration, and Australians’ long‑term earning potential too.

    Resilience

    This focus on improving living standards is a big part of this Budget because it’s the fundamental mission of our government.

    Creating opportunities, and helping people seize them in a world full of churn and change.

    We cannot undo or ignore the shift from globalisation to fragmentation.

    We can determine how we respond.

    That’s what a Future Made in Australia is about.

    It’s a pro‑trade agenda, that puts a premium on private sector investment.

    It rejects self‑sabotaging tariffs and trade barriers, protectionism and isolationism.

    It focuses on how we shore up critical supply chains and become indispensable to new ones.

    This is critical to the jobs of the future.

    And it’s vital to managing uncertainty now.

    $30 billion of projects in sectors like green hydrogen, critical minerals and clean energy manufacturing have been proposed or are in development.

    Our plan is to build on this progress – improving our resilience by unlocking our competitiveness.

    In this Budget we’re facilitating more private investment in renewable energy – our fundamental comparative advantage in the new net zero economy.

    We’re funding research in clean energy technology manufacturing and low carbon liquid fuels – so we can commercialise Australian innovations.

    And we’re making big investments in green metals – leveraging our traditional strength in resources to build new opportunities.

    Reform

    A Future Made in Australia, powered by cleaner and cheaper energy, positions us as an essential part of the global net zero economy.

    This will be critical to our growth prospects.

    But it’s not the only part of our growth agenda.

    We know the foundations of future success start with more competitiveness, and a more productive economy.

    That’s why we’re reforming the payments system, our financial market infrastructure, approvals processes, our foreign investment framework and more.

    It might be unusual to keep the wheels of economic reform turning in a pre‑election Budget, but that’s what we’re doing.

    First, by banning non‑compete clauses for most workers.

    And second, by creating a national licensing scheme for electrical occupations.

    We’re proud of these changes because they show that the way to increase competition and productivity in our economy isn’t with scorched‑earth industrial relations –

    Or making Australians work longer for less.

    It’s with policy that boosts competition, while boosting wages and our workforce at the same time.

    This is a Budget that’s pro‑worker, pro‑growth and pro‑competition.

    Our reform to non‑competes will remove a handbrake on competition and a speedbump to aspiration.

    Most workers will no longer need a lawyer to get a better paying job.

    They won’t need permission from their old boss to become their own boss.

    Instead, we’re empowering them to move jobs and earn more and start businesses if they want to.

    This could add an estimated $5 billion annually to our economy.

    At the same time as average wages for those freed from these restrictions could increase by up to $2,500 a year.

    We’re also boosting competition and backing workers with a new occupational licensing regime for electricians.

    Requiring electricians to get a new license every time they want to work inter‑state is unnecessary, costly red tape.

    We’re making sure a sparky on the Tweed doesn’t need a different licence for a job in Coolangatta.

    Broader licensing reform could lift GDP by up to $10 billion a year.

    Which is why this change will be a template for future reform.

    Reason 3: risk

    Our progress to here, and our plan for what’s ahead, make up 2 parts of our economic case for re‑election.

    The third is the risk that all this could be undone by a Coalition government.

    Usually at this point in Budget week or the electoral cycle, you would set some basic tests for your opponent.

    On this occasion they’ve already failed them.

    The Coalition has put forward the ‘weakest policy offering from an opposition in living memory’, according to industry sources.

    They either don’t have a clue or they won’t come clean.

    But what looks like slapstick comedy masks more sinister intent.

    We know this because Angus Taylor has told us, and the Coalition’s position on key issues has shown us.

    Now, Angus and I don’t agree on much.

    But to give credit where it’s due, he made one insightful point recently when he said ‘the best predictor of future performance is past performance’.

    And – in a dramatic break from usual Coalition internals – Peter Dutton backed him in.

    On this, they are absolutely right.

    Their past performance is no surpluses, more waste and rorts, and more debt.

    Their past performance is middle Australia missing out – with real wages in reverse and living standards falling fast.

    Their past performance is much higher and rising inflation.

    Their past performance is Peter Dutton’s attacks on Medicare.

    But it is not just their record in government that reveals their priorities and what they would do if elected.

    Their recent record in Opposition makes it very clear:

    Australians would be worse off under Peter Dutton.

    When he cuts, Australians will pay.

    Cutting cost‑of‑living help is the only motivation that binds this Coalition clown show together.

    They’ve opposed cuts to student debt and energy bill relief.

    Opposed cheaper childcare and cheaper medicines.

    Opposed more homes and more Urgent Care Clinics.

    Today they voted for higher taxes on Australian workers.

    Australians would be much worse off if Peter Dutton had his way and they’ll be worse off still if he wins.

    This brain snap from Angus Taylor on tax makes that crystal clear.

    It means this parliamentary term finishes like it started:

    Labor helping Australians with the cost of living and Peter Dutton and the Coalition trying to prevent it.

    The Liberals and Nationals have now opposed 3 tax cuts, 3 times in 3 years.

    Instead of working with us to help Australians, they’ve got secret plans to harm them.

    It beggars belief that Peter Dutton says he will make hundreds of billions in cuts, but won’t tell Australians where or how.

    There’s only one reason for that – and people should know about it.

    The Coalition can’t find the $600 billion they need for nuclear, or the billions in cuts they’ve promised, without coming after Medicare again.

    The point I’m making is this.

    When the Australian economy is turning a corner.

    And the global economy is taking a turn for the worse.

    We can’t afford to turn back.

    Not when so little is known about the alternative.

    Conclusion

    I know this tradition is as much about your questions as it is about the Treasurer’s address.

    So let me just share some final thoughts.

    There are familiar rituals and rhythms to Budget week.

    Even after 20 years, you can still get caught up in them.

    But a budget is never about one week, or 5.

    It’s overwhelmingly a program for the years ahead.

    Ours also makes the economic case for re‑election.

    More than that, it spells out our plan for action to build on the progress we’ve made together.

    Now, it’s probably fair to say that over the years and out in the suburbs there’s been a flattening of expectations of what we can achieve through economic policymaking.

    And a narrowing of our collective sense that political leadership can make a real and tangible difference in people’s lives.

    Every one of us has reason to reflect on our role, but also, on whether we can turn it around.

    Because Australians should be proud of all that we have achieved together.

    We are on the cusp of something extraordinary in our economy.

    But something prevents us from saying so.

    Maybe that’s because of Australians’ natural streak of humility.

    Maybe after years of crisis, we’ve trained ourselves to brace for the next one.

    Maybe it’s the erosion of trust in institutions that we see around the world.

    Something that Australia has so far managed to avoid the most extreme fallout from.

    But a big part of it is undoubtedly due to the pressure people are under.

    We get that.

    Because, while we have every reason to be optimistic about the future, we understand that this can often run ahead of
    how people are faring and feeling.

    For many Australians, the pressures of the past few years have been substantial.

    So let me say we don’t just acknowledge that – we’re doing something about it.

    You saw that again in the Budget last night.

    Yes, inflation is coming down, real wages are up, unemployment is low, interest rates have started coming down, the economy is bouncing back.

    But for many people, the gap between working hard and getting ahead still needs eliminating.

    That’s why there’s more work to do.

    It’s why our focus isn’t confined to the national numbers – as important as they are.

    This Budget is about more than turning the corner, it’s a plan for where we go next.

    Not just putting the worst behind us –

    But seizing what’s in front of us.

    In this new world of uncertainty –

    Creating a new generation of prosperity –

    That is stronger, because it is more inclusive –

    In the better future that we’re building together.

    Thanks very much.

    MIL OSI News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – A Europe ready for war by 2030 – P-001202/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-001202/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Friedrich Pürner (NI)

    On 19 March 2025, the Commission presented the White Paper on European Defence and the ReArm Europe Plan/Readiness 2030. A total of EUR 800 billion are to be invested in programmes such as ‘ReArm Europe’ and ‘Security Action for Europe’ (SAFE EU). The Commission President emphasised that the era of the peace dividend was over and that the EU would have to switch to a war economy. The aim is to make Europe fit for war by 2030 – a choice of words that could stir up fears among the population and make them receptive to the announced ‘turning point’.

    Although Article 41(2) of the Treaty on European Union prohibits military and defence expenditure from the EU budget, the Commission is planning this massive increase in military hardware. Moreover, the plans are to be adopted in an expedited procedure, deliberately without the involvement of the European Parliament, which is responsible for budgetary approval and budget review.

    • 1.On what legal basis does the Commission justify restricting the European Parliament’s co-decision powers, thereby weakening democratic scrutiny by elected Members?
    • 2.How does the Commission reconcile the proposal to upgrade military hardware and the coordination thereof with the EU Treaty, particularly with regard to the principle of subsidiarity?
    • 3.What specific measures, points of contact and control mechanisms will be put in place to avoid mistakes such as those made in the acquisition of vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic – in particular under the responsibility of the Commission President – and how does the Commission ensure transparency and the enforcement of accountability in the use of funds under these programmes?

    Submitted: 20.3.2025

    Last updated: 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Alpine ENT Expands Partnership with CareCloud, Implements FrontDesk Assist to Enhance Patient Experience

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SOMERSET, N.J., March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — CareCloud, Inc. (the “Company”) (Nasdaq: CCLD, CCLDO), a leading provider of healthcare technology and AI-powered revenue cycle management (RCM) solutions, today announced the expanded adoption of its services by Alpine Ear, Nose & Throat PC, a premier otolaryngology group based in Colorado. Following a successful RCM engagement, Alpine ENT has now implemented CareCloud FrontDesk Assist—a comprehensive front-office solution designed to streamline operations and enhance patient satisfaction.

    “CareCloud has proven to be a true partner in optimizing our practice,” said Mike Heck, CEO of Alpine ENT. “Since deploying FrontDesk Assist, we’ve seen tangible improvements across our front-desk operations. Patient wait times are shorter, appointment scheduling is smoother, and our staff now spends far less time on administrative tasks.”

    FrontDesk Assist now supports Alpine ENT with critical front-office functions such as appointment scheduling, referral management, surgery estimates, and prior authorizations. These services complement the existing RCM partnership by boosting operational efficiency and freeing up clinical staff to focus more on patient care.

    With 24 providers across three Northern Colorado locations, Alpine ENT delivers a full spectrum of ENT services, including audiology, vestibular therapy, and allergy care. Since implementing FrontDesk Assist, the practice has experienced measurable gains in productivity and patient engagement—underscoring a mutual commitment to innovation, operational excellence, and care quality.

    “Alpine ENT’s decision to expand our collaboration speaks to the trust they place in CareCloud’s expertise and solutions,” said Crystal Williams, President of CareCloud. “With FrontDesk Assist, they gain a seamlessly integrated platform that drives both financial and patient-centered outcomes. Our mission is to simplify practice operations so providers can focus on delivering exceptional care.”

    This partnership expansion reinforces CareCloud’s dedication to delivering scalable, tech-enabled solutions that help healthcare organizations thrive amid industry transformation. FrontDesk Assist is now available nationwide to healthcare practices of all specialties—including the thousands already using CareCloud’s EHR and RCM platforms.

    To learn more about CareCloud FrontDesk Assist, visit www.carecloud.com/frontdesk-assist.

    About CareCloud

    CareCloud brings disciplined innovation and generative AI to the business of healthcare. Our suite of technology-enabled solutions helps clients increase financial and operational performance, streamline clinical workflows and improve the patient experience. More than 40,000 providers count on CareCloud to help them improve patient care while reducing administrative burdens and operating costs. Learn more about our products and services including revenue cycle management (RCM), practice management (PM), electronic health records (EHR), business intelligence, patient experience management (PXM) and digital health at www.carecloud.com.

    Follow CareCloud on LinkedIn, X and Facebook.

    Disclaimer

    This press release is for information purposes only, and does not constitute an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or other jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to the registration or qualification under the securities laws of such state or jurisdiction.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to anticipated future events, future results of operations or future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “might,” “will,” “shall,” “should,” “could”, “intends,” “expects,” “plans,” “goals,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “possible,” “potential,” “target,” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.

    Our operations involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside our control, and any one of which, or a combination of which, could materially affect our results of operations and whether the forward-looking statements ultimately prove to be correct. Forward-looking statements in this press release include, without limitation, statements reflecting management’s expectations for future financial performance and operating expenditures, expected growth, profitability and business outlook, the impact of pandemics on our financial performance and business activities, and the expected results from the integration of our acquisitions.

    These forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are only predictions, are uncertain and involve substantial known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our (or our industry’s) actual results, levels of activity or performance to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity or performance expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of the risks and uncertainties that could have an impact on the forward-looking statements, including without limitation, risks and uncertainties relating to the Company’s ability to manage growth, migrate newly acquired customers and retain new and existing customers, maintain cost-effective global operations, increase operational efficiency and reduce operating costs, predict and properly adjust to changes in reimbursement and other industry regulations and trends, retain the services of key personnel, develop new technologies, upgrade and adapt legacy and acquired technologies to work with evolving industry standards, compete with other companies’ products and services competitive with ours, and other important risks and uncertainties referenced and discussed under the heading titled “Risk Factors” in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    The statements in this press release are made as of the date of this press release, even if subsequently made available by the Company on its website or otherwise. The Company does not assume any obligations to update the forward-looking statements provided to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they were made.

    SOURCE CareCloud

    Company Contact:
    Norman Roth
    Interim Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller
    CareCloud, Inc.
    nroth@carecloud.com

    Investor Contact:
    Stephen Snyder
    Co-Chief Executive Officer
    CareCloud, Inc.
    ir@carecloud.com

    The MIL Network –

    March 27, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: 50th anniversary of the entry into force of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC): UK statement

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    World news story

    50th anniversary of the entry into force of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC): UK statement

    David Riley, UK Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva, gave this UK statement on the 50th anniversary of the BTWC’s entry into force.

    David Riley, UK Ambassador and Permanent Representative to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva.

    Today marks the 50th anniversary of the entry into force of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC) – the first multilateral disarmament treaty to ban an entire category of weapons of mass destruction. As a founder of the convention, and for 50 years since, the UK has been at the forefront of efforts to ensure its effectiveness and collective action to eliminate the threat from biological weapons. 

    The BTWC’s role in preventing biological agents and toxins from being developed, produced, or used as weapons has been a critical element in our collective security over the last 50 years.   

    The BTWC’s call to action is that “no effort should be spared to minimise this risk.” This is as important now as it was 50 years ago. Threats posed by biological weapons have evolved and diversified. Rapid advances in science and technology offer potential benefits for societies but may also increase the threats posed by those intending to misuse the life sciences for hostile purposes. 

    The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the devastating impacts that an infectious disease outbreak can have on our societies and economies. It revealed significant gaps in global preparedness and response. It is in every country’s interest that the BTWC is effective and that its prohibitions continue to be upheld. 

    This requires collective action through the Convention. We need to strengthen international cooperation and review science and technology, as well as agree on stronger verification mechanisms to address potential risks. The current Working Group on the strengthening of the Convention provides an important way to achieve this. The UK fully supports the Brazilian Chair of the Working Group, Ambassador Frederico Meyer.

    The UK remains steadfast in its commitment to strengthen the BTWC and its implementation for the next 50 years and beyond. We call on all governments that have not yet joined the convention to do so without delay. Through collective action, we can prevent the use of these abhorrent weapons that violate every principle of humanity.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 26 March 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    March 26, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Nations: World News in Brief: Human rights in Ukraine, multilateralism gets airborne, enforced disappearances in Colombia

    Source: United Nations MIL OSI b

    5 December 2024 Human Rights

    The UN human rights chief on Thursday told a conference in the Ukrainian capital that in the face of Russia’s continuing full-scale invasion, they must unite and keep faith in democratic institutions.

    Addressing the conference in Kyiv on reclaiming human rights and preserving dignity, High Commissioner Volker Türk once again voiced his “full solidarity” with the Ukrainian people and concern over the latest wave of attacks on energy facilities as temperatures plummet.

    “Children, older people and those with disabilities will suffer most,” he added.

    Relentless assault

    “From relentless drone attacks to the occupation of territory, from the suppression of culture to the abuse of prisoners of war – the human rights of Ukrainians are under siege. And this must end.”

    He said it was more important than ever for unity, “moment to recommit to human rights and human dignity, and to build and maintain trust in each other and in democratic institutions.”

    He added that the UN human rights office he leads, OHCHR, is doing its part to ensure accountability and justice by creating a public record of rights violations occurring during Ukraine’s war of national survival, which has already informed cases before the European Court of Human Rights and the International Court of Justice.

    “I commend Ukrainians for coming together around human rights and around human dignity and assure you of our full commitment and support,” he concluded.

    ICAO, ‘a powerful example of multilateralism in action,’ says UN chief

    UN Secretary-General António Guterres marked the 80th anniversary of the signing of the convention that opened the way to mass civilian air travel, by praising the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) as a testament to global cooperation.

    “Across the decades, your organization, which the Convention established, has expanded dramatically, from 54 nations gathered in Chicago in 1944 to a membership of 193 today,” he noted.

    Mr. Guterres highlighted the significant challenges facing the aviation industry today, particularly its role in addressing the climate crisis.

    Tourism revival

    According to the latest World Tourism Barometer from the UN Tourism agency, global travel is on track for a full recovery to pre-pandemic levels by the end of 2024, with 1.1 billion international tourists recorded in the first nine months of the year. However, this resurgence brings about sustainability challenges.

    “Accounting for around 2 per cent of global carbon dioxide emissions, aviation is one of the most challenging sectors to decarbonise. But with innovation and investment, it can be done,” Mr. Guterres noted.

    ICAO’s new Long-Term Strategic Plan outlines its commitment to achieving net zero carbon dioxide emissions by 2050.

    The Secretary-General commended ICAO’s leadership for aligning its efforts with the 2030 Agenda, ensuring that all countries benefit from sustainable aviation advancements.

    Enforced disappearances remain daily reality in Colombia

    Enforced disappearances remain a daily occurrence in Colombia, not just a historical legacy of the past, according to findings released on Thursday by the UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances (CED) following their two-week mission to the country.

    The preliminary findings painted a grim picture of disappearances including children, journalists, social leaders and migrants.

    With estimates ranging from 98,000 to 200,000 missing persons, the exact scope of the crisis remains unclear due to fragmented record-keeping and institutional inefficiencies. 

    “Although enforced disappearances started in Colombia around the 1940s, they are not just a crime of the past. They continue to occur daily across the country in diverse circumstances,” the delegation reported after visiting six cities and meeting with 80 authorities, including the Minister of Justice and Attorney General.

    The investigation exposed a bureaucratic system where victims’ families face challenges in seeking justice.

    ‘No end in sight’ to anguish

    One victim told investigators, “We don’t know where to turn. We’re tossed between institutions, no end in sight”.

    The situation is further complicated by overlapping mandates among various agencies, with officials reporting that coordination efforts often result in endless meetings rather than concrete action. A single search process may require coordination with up to 60 different national and territorial authorities.

    The Committee emphasised that immediate action is needed to streamline institutional responses and improve coordination. They noted that marginalised individuals, face additional obstacles in reporting disappearances, particularly in areas controlled by armed groups.

    “Families of the disappeared deserve clarity, justice and accountability. Every disappeared person represents a family waiting for answers, a community torn apart and a society grappling with unresolved pain,” the delegation said.

    MIL OSI United Nations News –

    March 26, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Our work and home lives are blending more than ever – how do we navigate this new ‘zigzag’ reality?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Candice Harris, Professor of Management, Auckland University of Technology

    Black Salmon/Shutterstock

    For decades, researchers examined work and home life as separate domains. If they were taken together it was usually to study so-called work-life balance.

    But these days, the reality is more complex. Our work and home lives are more seamlessly integrated than ever, largely because of communications technology and the work-from-home trend.

    This can mean we deal with a work matter and a bit of domestic or family business virtually simultaneously, shifting attention and focus from one to the other within seconds.

    We’ve dubbed this phenomenon “zigzag working” to describe how employees blend work and family roles within times and spaces that might once have been separate.

    During and in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic, this became more common as many working parents had to perform their paid work at home. But as workers increasingly return to the office, has zigzag working become the new normal?

    In our research, we studied zigzag working beyond COVID to test support for it, and to understand its effects on conflict and happiness. Our study used a survey with two samples: 318 employees and 373 managers.

    Zigzag working in action

    Zigzag working provides a unique way to examine the blending of work and life. Frequent interspersing of family and work happens regularly. But what does it look like?

    Consider Raj, a senior banking professional and solo parent of a 14-year-old. Here’s how a couple of hours of interspersing work and family while in the office unfold:

    11:02 am. While listening to the CEO’s update, Raj messages his son, encouraging him to play basketball in the school break instead of gaming. His son responds with “whatever”.

    11:09 am. Raj replies: “Yes, whatever – go have a run.”

    11:48 am. He dashes out to buy lunch, remembering school camp fees are due by 5 pm.

    11:54 am. Heading back to his office, he takes a call from a colleague.

    12:02 pm. Back at his desk, Raj checks his diary while on the call, realising it’s his mother’s birthday.

    12:11 pm. Raj orders flowers for her, remembering he often said “whatever” as a teenager. He starts a message to his son but is interrupted when pulled into an urgent meeting.

    12:27 pm. As the meeting unfolds, Raj realises it has minimal impact on his division. Multitasking, he messages his son, replies to an email and mentally reviews his to-do list, including the camp fees.

    12.43 pm. Working on a product proposal, he notices no replies from his son or the florist, but his mother has messaged telling him not to bring anything for dinner since he’s so busy.

    Technology has allowed employees to blend work and family roles simultaneously.
    GaudiLab/Shutterstock

    Zigzag working results

    After speaking with employees and managers, we were able to identify several key points.

    • Zigzag working, characterised by frequent small transitions between work and family responsibilities, occurs throughout the workday.

    • Both men and women regularly zigzag between work and family responsibilities during the day. Gender differences were tested for, finding no significant variation in zigzagging behaviour. This contrasts with prior research that often finds gender differences in work-family conflict.

    • Managers zigzag more than employees.

    • Zigzag working is more prevalent for those working from home. This aligns with the idea that remote work environments make it easier for employees to switch rapidly between work and personal responsibilities.

    • Even those not working from home still reported moderate levels of zigzag working, suggesting this phenomenon is not limited to remote work.

    • Zigzag working was linked to both work-family conflict and happiness, underscoring its unique impact. While managing multiple responsibilities can be challenging, it can also be rewarding – especially when individuals feel a sense of control over their time and tasks.

    The key takeaway? Zigzagging exists, and it is practised across genders, levels of seniority and locations. While it makes workers busier, our research found it also makes them happier.

    Employers should embrace zigzag working

    Recognising zigzagging as a normal work dynamic can foster a more supportive workplace, enhancing employee wellbeing, focus and overall performance. Employers can promote discussions about zigzagging to challenge rigid work-life boundaries.

    Encouraging men to share their zigzagging experiences broadens the conversation beyond the assumption that openly juggling work and family is primarily a women’s issue. Normalising work-family intersections can make them feel more manageable and even gratifying.

    Zigzagging is not a one-size-fits-all approach. Employers should recognise that zigzagging can vary by job role, time constraints and caregiving responsibilities, differing across professions and individuals.

    Technology can further support zigzag working, enabling staff to efficiently manage both work and family responsibilities.

    Zigzagging provides a fresh perspective on the blend of work and family, revealing the interplay between work and family can be simultaneously both beneficial and detrimental. Zigzaggers may be busy, but they are also happy – working as masters of their own universes.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Our work and home lives are blending more than ever – how do we navigate this new ‘zigzag’ reality? – https://theconversation.com/our-work-and-home-lives-are-blending-more-than-ever-how-do-we-navigate-this-new-zigzag-reality-251601

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    March 26, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Research reveals gender bias blind spot among men in local leadership

    Source:

    26 March 2025

    Men in local leadership positions are unaware of gender leadership disparities and are less likely to challenge dominant stereotypes compared to women, suggests new research by the University of South Australia.

    UniSA researchers interviewed more than 30 people in local leadership roles in regions experiencing industrial transformation, across government, business, sporting clubs, religious organisations and academia. All participants were from communities directly affected by the closure of Australia’s automotive industry in 2017, in suburban Melbourne, northern Adelaide and Geelong. They were interviewed in 2023 about gendered stereotypes that existed when the crisis unfolded and progressed, as well as when COVID hit.

    The findings suggest that women and men leaders agreed on what makes a good leader. However, women experienced daily impacts related to gender leadership stereotypes and actively worked to break down these biases. On the other hand, men leaders tended to be unaware of gender differences, believing they didn’t exist.

    Lead researcher Dr Lynette Washington says the men in the study largely accepted dominant gender leadership norms without questioning them, limiting their ability to push for alternative leadership styles which might assist to drive real change in regions undergoing a major industrial shift.

    “The thing that was most striking was that when we spoke to women, they immediately identified that they were impacted by stereotypes and they undertook detailed, sophisticated work to deconstruct those ideas. They understood how stereotypes impacted them, they thought about that impact regularly and deeply, and it was very much front of mind for them,” she says.

    “When we asked the men about gender bias, they didn’t believe that it existed for women or men leaders. And because of that, they couldn’t deconstruct these ideas to understand how they functioned and impacted people in the workplace.”

    The research was centred around the concept of ‘place-based leadership’, a collaborative, community-led approach to leadership that aims to improve the social and economic outcomes for a specific community.

    Dr Washington says place-based leadership is not much so much about the job a leader is doing but the way they’re doing it – with an emphasis on collaboration, leading through persuasion, soft power and networking.

    “It’s about their understanding and care of the place. Many place-based leaders live in the place they lead and key to being a placed-based leader is having a connection or a personal investment,” she says.

    “The findings of our study suggest that greater awareness of gender in leadership would help create more inclusive and effective leadership and this could lead to fairer outcomes.”

    One of the research participants shared her experience with gender bias in local government. 

    “The first time I stood up to speak in council the town clerk said to me, “Well that’s very nice. Now be a good girl and sit down,” she said.

    Researchers have documented gender bias in leadership since the 1970s, a phenomenon that US researcher Dr Virginia Schein called “think manager, think male”. Dr Washington explains the issue now is that men must do more to help deconstruct bias.

    “If men can’t take that first step of acknowledging gender stereotyping in the workplace is real, they can’t do the work to address it. Women are acknowledging it and working hard to deconstruct and change it, but part of the reason it’s not progressing in the way that it needs to is that men aren’t also doing that work to the degree that is required for change,” she says.

    “Without equality in leadership, we can’t access the full wealth of knowledge, experience and ability that exists in places. Left behind places need to access the full range of skills and abilities that they hold to ensure they can meet the challenges ahead.

    “Places like the northern suburbs in Adelaide and Geelong in Victoria experienced significant disruption when the car manufacturing industry closed and were also hit hard during the pandemic. We need the best possible leadership in these places and that means challenging old ways of leading and introducing new, more effective leadership styles. One way to do that is to have a greater awareness of gender within leadership.

    “This will result in more equal outcomes across the regions.”

    To access the research paper: Washington, L., Beer, A., & Kulik, C. T. (2024). Gender, place leadership and levelling up across regions. Contemporary Social Science, 19(4), 583–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2024.2441856

    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Contact for interview: Dr Lynette Washington, Research Fellow, UniSA E: Lynette.Washington@unisa.edu.au

    Media contact: Melissa Keogh, Communications Officer, UniSA M: +403 659 154 E: Melissa.Keogh@unisa.edu.au

    MIL OSI News –

    March 26, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: What makes a good search engine? These 4 models can help you use search in the age of AI

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Simon Coghlan, Senior Lecturer in Digital Ethics, Centre for AI and Digital Ethics, School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne

    beast01/Shutterstock

    Every day, users ask search engines millions of questions. The information we receive can shape our opinions and behaviour.

    We are often not aware of their influence, but internet search tools sort and rank web content when responding to our queries. This can certainly help us learn more things. But search tools can also return low-quality information and even misinformation.

    Recently, large language models (LLMs) have entered the search scene. While LLMs are not search engines, commercial web search engines have started to include LLM-based artificial intelligence (AI) features into their products. Microsoft’s Copilot and Google’s Overviews are examples of this trend.

    AI-enhanced search is marketed as convenient. But, together with other changes in the nature of search over the last decades, it raises the question: what is a good search engine?

    Our new paper, published in AI and Ethics, explores this. To make the possibilities clearer, we imagine four search tool models: Customer Servant, Librarian, Journalist and Teacher. These models reflect design elements in search tools and are loosely based on matching human roles.

    The four models of search tools

    Customer Servant

    Workers in customer service give people the things they request. If someone asks for a “burger and fries”, they don’t query whether the request is good for the person, or whether they might really be after something else.

    The search model we call Customer Servant is somewhat like the first computer-aided information retrieval systems introduced in the 1950s. These returned sets of unranked documents matching a Boolean query – using simple logical rules to define relationships between keywords (e.g. “cats NOT dogs”).

    Librarian

    As the name suggests, this model somewhat resembles human librarians. Librarian also provides content that people request, but it doesn’t always take queries at face value.

    Instead, it aims for “relevance” by inferring user intentions from contextual information such as location, time or the history of user interactions. Classic web search engines of the late 1990s and early 2000s that rank results and provide a list of resources – think early Google – sit in this category.

    Librarians don’t just retrieve information, they strive for relevance.
    Tyler Olson/Shutterstock

    Journalist

    Journalists go beyond librarians. While often responding to what people want to know, journalists carefully curate that information, at times weeding out falsehoods and canvassing various public viewpoints.

    Journalists aim to make people better informed. The Journalist search model does something similar. It may customise the presentation of results by providing additional information, or by diversifying search results to give a more balanced list of viewpoints or perspectives.

    Teacher

    Human teachers, like journalists, aim at giving accurate information. However, they may exercise even more control: teachers may strenuously debunk erroneous information, while pointing learners to the very best expert sources, including lesser-known ones. They may even refuse to expand on claims they deem false or superficial.

    LLM-based conversational search systems such as Copilot or Gemini may play a roughly similar role. By providing a synthesised response to a prompt, they exercise more control over presented information than classic web search engines.

    They may also try to explicitly discredit problematic views on topics such as health, politics, the environment or history. They might reply with “I can’t promote misinformation” or “This topic requires nuance”. Some LLMs convey a strong “opinion” on what is genuine knowledge and what is unedifying.

    No search model is best

    We argue each search tool model has strengths and drawbacks.

    The Customer Servant is highly explainable: every result can be directly tied to keywords in your query. But this precision also limits the system, as it can’t grasp broader or deeper information needs beyond the exact terms used.

    The Librarian model uses additional signals like data about clicks to return content more aligned with what users are really looking for. The catch is these systems may introduce bias. Even with the best intentions, choices about relevance and data sources can reflect underlying value judgements.

    The Journalist model shifts the focus toward helping users understand topics, from science to world events, more fully. It aims to present factual information and various perspectives in balanced ways.

    This approach is especially useful in moments of crisis – like a global pandemic – where countering misinformation is critical. But there’s a trade-off: tweaking search results for social good raises concerns about user autonomy. It may feel paternalistic, and could open the door to broader content interventions.

    The Teacher model is even more interventionist. It guides users towards what it “judges” to be good information, while criticising or discouraging access to content it deems harmful or false. This can promote learning and critical thinking.

    But filtering or downranking content can also limit choice, and raises red flags if the “teacher” – whether algorithm or AI – is biased or simply wrong. Current language models often have built-in “guardrails” to align with human values, but these are imperfect. LLMs can also hallucinate plausible-sounding nonsense, or avoid offering perspectives we might actually want to hear.

    Staying vigilant is key

    We might prefer different models for different purposes. For example, since teacher-like LLMs synthesise and analyse vast amounts of web material, we may sometimes want their more opinionated perspective on a topic, such as on good books, world events or nutrition.

    Yet sometimes we may wish to explore specific and verifiable sources about a topic for ourselves. We may also prefer search tools to downrank some content – conspiracy theories, for example.

    LLMs make mistakes and can mislead with confidence. As these models become more central to search, we need to stay aware of their drawbacks, and demand transparency and accountability from tech companies on how information is delivered.

    Striking the right balance with search engine design and selection is no easy task. Too much control risks eroding individual choice and autonomy, while too little could leave harms unchecked.

    Our four ethical models offer a starting point for robust discussion. Further interdisciplinary research is crucial to define when and how search engines can be used ethically and responsibly.

    Damiano Spina has received funding from the Australian Research Council and is an Associate Investigator of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S).

    Falk Scholer has received funding from the Australian Research Council and is an Associate Investigator of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society (ADM+S).

    Hui Chia and Simon Coghlan do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. What makes a good search engine? These 4 models can help you use search in the age of AI – https://theconversation.com/what-makes-a-good-search-engine-these-4-models-can-help-you-use-search-in-the-age-of-ai-252927

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    March 26, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 86 87 88 89 90 … 162
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress