Category: Politics

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Constitutive meeting – Delegation for relations with South Africa

    Source: European Parliament

    During the first plenary sitting in Strasbourg of the newly-elected Parliament, MEPs approved the proposal on the number and numerical strength of the interparliamentary delegations.

    Each of the 48 European Parliament’s standing delegations will hold its constitutive meeting towards the end of September/beginning of October and will elect its respective bureau, comprising of a Chair and Vice-Chairs.

    The constitutive meeting of the D-ZA delegation will take place on

    Monday, 30 September from 16.30-16.50

    in room SPAAK 1A2

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: REPORT on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023 – A10-0063/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

    on the deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2023

    (2025/2027(INI))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to its previous resolutions on the outcome of the Committee on Petitions’ deliberations,

     having regard to Articles 10 and 11 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU),

     having regard to Articles 20, 24 and 227 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) on the right of EU citizens and residents to bring their concerns to the attention of Parliament,

     having regard to Article 228 TFEU on the role and functions of the European Ombudsman,

     having regard to Article 44 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union concerning the right to petition the European Parliament,

     having regard to the provisions of the TFEU relating to the infringement procedure and, in particular, to Articles 258 and 260 thereof,

     having regard to Rules 55 and 233(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

     having regard to the report of the Committee on Petitions (A10-0063/2025),

    A. whereas the purpose of the annual report on the outcome of the Committee on Petitions’ deliberations is to present an analysis of the petitions received in 2023 and of relations with other institutions, as well as to present an accurate picture of the objectives achieved in 2023;

    B. whereas in 2023, Parliament received 1 452 petitions, which represents an increase of 16.2 % compared to the 1 217 petitions submitted in 2022 and of 4.0 % compared to the 1 392 petitions registered in 2021; whereas the total amount of petitions received continues to be significantly lower than the peak reached in 2013 and 2014, when Parliament received 2 891 and 2 715 petitions, respectively;

    C. whereas in 2023, the number of users supporting one or more petitions on Parliament’s Petitions Web Portal was 26 331, which represents a considerable increase compared to the 22 441 users recorded in 2022 (both numbers are considerably lower than the 209 272 supporters recorded in 2021); whereas the number of clicks in support of petitions also increased slightly in 2023, reaching a total of 29 287 (compared with 27 927 in 2022 and 217 876 in 2021);

    D. whereas however, the overall number of petitions remains modest in relation to the total population of the EU, revealing that efforts still need to be stepped up to increase citizens’ awareness of their right to petition and the possible usefulness of petitions as a means of drawing the attention of the institutions and the Member States to matters that affect and concern citizens directly; whereas in exercising the right to petition, citizens expect the EU institutions to provide added value in finding a solution to their problems;

    E. whereas the criteria for the admissibility of petitions are laid down in Article 227 TFEU and Rule 232(1) of Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, which require that petitions must be submitted by an EU citizen or by a natural or legal person who is resident or has a registered office in a Member State and is directly affected by matters falling within the EU’s fields of activity;

    F. whereas of the 1 452 petitions submitted in 2023, 429 were declared inadmissible and 13 were withdrawn; whereas the high percentage (29.55 %) of inadmissible petitions in 2023 confirms that there is still a widespread lack of clarity about the scope of the EU’s areas of responsibility; whereas in order to reduce the number of inadmissible petitions, efforts still need to be made to clarify further the scope of the EU’s fields of activity;

    G. whereas the right to petition Parliament is a fundamental right of EU citizens, offering both citizens and residents an open, democratic and transparent mechanism to address their elected representatives directly; whereas this essential tool empowers citizens to actively and effectively participate in the life of the Union; whereas through petitions, EU citizens can complain about failures to implement EU law and help detect breaches of EU law;

    H. whereas Parliament is the only EU institution directly elected by EU citizens; whereas the right to petition the European Parliament is one of the fundamental rights of EU citizens and residents and it allows them to address their elected representatives directly; whereas Parliament has long been at the forefront of the development of the petitions process internationally and has the most open, democratic and transparent petitions process in Europe, allowing petitioners to participate actively and effectively in its activities, whereas in exercising the right to petitions, citizens expect the EU institutions provide added value, cooperating with the Commission and Member State authorities, in solving their problems;

    I. whereas the information submitted by petitioners in their petitions and during committee meetings, along with the Commission’s assessments and the replies from the Member States and other bodies, also provide valuable input for the work of other parliamentary committees, given that admissible petitions are forwarded to the relevant committee for an opinion or for information; whereas, therefore, petitions can also play a role in the legislative process, providing concrete feedback on the impact of EU policies and enabling policies to address emerging needs;

    J. whereas the activities of the Committee on Petitions are based on the input provided by petitioners, enabling Parliament to enhance its responsiveness to complaints and concerns relating to respect for fundamental EU rights and compliance with EU legislation in the Member States; whereas petitions are therefore a useful source of information on instances of misapplication or breaches of EU law, enabling an assessment of the application of EU law and its impact on the rights of EU citizens and residents; whereas in 2023 fundamental rights were one of the three most important concerns of all petitioners; whereas, in the context of the structured dialogue with the Commission, the Committee on Petitions called on the Commission to fight discrimination in the European Union, including through initiatives to guarantee equal rights and to strengthen measures against all forms of discrimination, including those based on sex, racial or ethnic origin, disability, age, religion or belief and sexual orientation;

    K. whereas according to Article 17 TEU the Commission should ensure the correct application of the Treaties and of measures adopted pursuant to them; whereas the Commission’s strategic approach to addressing issues raised in petitions must be fully consistent with the Treaties in order to ensure the most effective follow-up of petitions, aiming at guaranteeing full and timely protection of citizens’ rights arising from EU law;

    L. whereas each petition must be considered and examined carefully, efficiently, impartially, fairly and transparently, in line with the standards set in Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union on the Right to good administration; whereas all petitioners have the right to receive a reply informing them about the decision on admissibility and follow-up actions taken by the committee within a reasonable period of time, in their own language or in the language used in the petition; whereas timely and effective responses by the Commission and Member States to the issues raised in the petitions, along with solutions for redress, where appropriate, contribute to strengthening the trust citizens place in the Union and its policies;

    M. whereas the Committee on Petitions attaches the utmost importance to the examination and public discussion of petitions at its meetings; whereas petitioners have the right to present their petitions and frequently take the floor in the discussion, thereby actively contributing to the work of the committee; whereas in 2023, the Committee on Petitions held 10 committee meetings, at which 191 petitions were discussed with 114 petitioners present and actively participating by taking the floor;

    N. whereas the main subjects of concern raised in petitions submitted in 2023 related to the environment, fundamental rights, personal matters and justice;

    O.  whereas when adopting its meeting agenda, the Committee on Petitions pays attention to petitions and topics with a high degree of relevance for discussion at EU level and to the need to maintain a balanced geographical coverage of topics according to the petitions received;

    P. whereas 82.4 % of the petitions received in 2023 were submitted via Parliament’s Petitions Web Portal, which is a slight increase compared to 2022 (79.05 %), thus reconfirming it as by far the most used channel for citizens to submit petitions to Parliament;

    Q. whereas in February 2023, the Petitions Web Portal was revamped and relaunched to align it with current expectations and make it easier for residents of the Member States to exercise their right to submit petitions to Parliament; whereas the updated Petitions Portal 2.0 integrated seamlessly with Parliament’s web publishing tool, enabling faster and simpler content updates and new features (including seven ‘Quick Start Guides’ that provide clear, step-by-step instructions for submitting, tracking and supporting petitions); whereas a new search engine powered by elastic search technology enhanced the user experience by delivering more accurate results efficiently leading to the new portal’s prioritising a truly citizen-centred approach; whereas during 2023 all petitions were prepared and published in a timely manner, within a few days of their adoption, and all internal and external requests for support on the use and content of the Petitions Portal were replied to successfully, in a timely manner and in all languages;

    R. Whereas in 2023, the Committee on Petitions (PETI) held four fact-finding visits, during which Members travelled to Romania to examine the management and the protection of the brown bear population and illegal logging, to Donegal (Ireland) to investigate the use of defective mica blocks in construction in Ireland and to Catalonia (Spain) to assess in situ the language immersion model in Catalonia; whereas PETI members were also part of a joint delegation from the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs, the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and PETI that travelled to New York to attend the 16th session of the Conference of States Parties to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD COSP);

    S. whereas under Parliament’s Rules of Procedure, the Committee on Petitions is also responsible for relations with the European Ombudsman, who investigates complaints about maladministration within the institutions and bodies of the EU; whereas the previous European Ombudsman, Emily O’Reilly, presented her annual report for 2022 to the Committee on Petitions at its meeting of 27 June 2023;

    T. whereas the Committee on Petitions is a member of the European Network of Ombudsmen, which also includes the European Ombudsman, national and regional ombudsmen and similar bodies in the Member States, the candidate countries and other European Economic Area countries, and which aims to promote the exchange of information about EU law and policy, and to share best practice;

    1. Emphasises Committee on Petition’s fundamental role in protecting and promoting the rights of EU citizens and residents by ensuring that petitioners’ concerns and complaints are examined in a timely, effective and appropriate manner and that petitioners are informed about the actions taken and progress made on their petitions; recalls that all petitions are treated through an open, democratic and transparent petition process;

    2. Welcomes the successful contribution the Committee on Petitions made to dealing with the case of the repatriation of children, together with their mothers, who were detained for years in dire conditions in Syrian refugee camps and suffering from serious illness, malnutrition, severe psychological pressure and whose health conditions were worsening day by day; appreciates that the main legal arguments supported unanimously in PETI were substantially backed by the Danish Supreme Court in its order to offer repatriation and support by the Danish foreign ministry to both the children concerned and their mothers;

    3. Reiterates the importance of a continuous public debate on the EU’s fields of activity in order to ensure that citizens are properly informed about the scope of the Union’s competences and the different levels of decision-making; calls for an EU-wide enhanced structured information and communication campaign in all EU official languages in collaboration with national and regional ombudsmen, NGOs, and educational institutions to increase awareness of petition rights among citizens from all Member States, particularly addressing rural and disadvantaged communities and marginalised groups, as well as, remote islands and regions; proposes an expansion of outreach efforts through social media and local community events, emphasises the need for broader awareness-raising campaigns, through the active involvement of communications services, to help increase citizens’ knowledge about their right to petition, as well as the scope of the EU’s responsibilities and the competences of the Committee on Petitions, with a view to reducing the number of inadmissible petitions and enhancing citizen engagement in the decision-making process; recommends improving the digital accessibility of the Petitions Portal, including through adaptations for people with disabilities and higher quality translations into all official EU languages; recommends exploring the potential of the existing IT tools in order to increase citizens’ support on the portal, including through redirecting options to relevant complaint mechanisms;

    4. Recalls the European dimension of the Committee on Petitions, which can be addressed by citizens from all 27 Member States on issues that fall within the scope of the EU Treaties and EU law; believes that the Committee has a special responsibility to uphold this European dimension and to demonstrate the added value of European unity and integration to citizens;

    5. Points out that petitions constitute a unique opportunity for Parliament and the other EU institutions to directly connect with EU citizens and maintain a regular dialogue with them, particularly in cases where they are affected by the misapplication or breach of EU law; stresses the need for enhanced cooperation between the EU institutions and national, regional and local authorities on inquiries regarding the implementation of, and compliance with, EU law; believes that such cooperation is crucial to address and resolve citizens’ concerns over the application of EU law and that it contributes to strengthening the democratic legitimacy and accountability of the Union; calls, therefore, for the participation of Member States’ representatives in committee meetings and for timely and detailed responses to requests for clarification or information sent by the Committee on Petitions to national authorities;

    6. Recalls that petitions contribute considerably to the exercise of the Commission’s role as the guardian of the Treaties by providing citizens with an additional tool to report alleged breaches of EU law; stresses that constructive cooperation between the Committee on Petitions and the Commission through timely and detailed answers from the Commission, which are based on thorough examinations of the issues raised in petitions, is essential to ensure the successful treatment of petitions;

    7. Reiterates its call on the Commission to provide legal clarifications on the key criteria underpinning its strategic approach to enforcing EU law and to regularly update the Committee on Petitions on developments in infringement proceedings and to ensure that the Committee on Petitions gets access to the all relevant documents on EU Pilot and infringement procedures and legislative initiatives that were launched based on petitions received; is of the opinion that increased transparency and regular feedback on the handling of ongoing infringement procedures by the Commission would be beneficial for the Committee’s follow-up of open petitions; welcomes the recent Commission initiative to include petitions in the search system of the infringement register of the Commission; stresses that it is important for the Commission to conduct timely investigations into petitions, highlighting violations of rights affecting a large number of citizens and residents within the EU and to consult, where appropriate, the relevant national ombudsman; expresses its concerns about the way the Commission is handling some infringement procedures launched against Member States, including those related to issues raised in many petitions; encourages the Commission to put in place all necessary measures to improve transparency and effectiveness of its management of infringement procedures, which can be perceived as opaque by citizens;

    8. Calls on the Commission to assess whether the national authorities are taking the necessary measures to respond to citizens’ concerns, as expressed in their petitions, where cases of failure to comply with EU law occur, and to launch infringement procedures where necessary; emphasises that timely and proactive action by the Commission in cases of breaches of EU law is crucial to prevent such breaches, which could undermine citizens’ trust in European institutions, becoming systemic in nature;

    9. Emphasises the need for enhanced and more active cooperation between Member States and the Committee on petitions in order to unblock those petitions requiring prompt responses and reactions from the national authorities; recalls that the delayed responses of the Member States could have an impact on the timely resolution of issues raised by citizens and negative consequences for the solution of breaches of Union law; notes that the Member States should guarantee responses to petitions within the three-month deadline requested; stresses that improved coordination and dialogue would facilitate a more efficient handling of citizens’ concerns, prevent unnecessary delays and strengthen the effectiveness of the petition process;

    10. Strongly condemns the harassment and intimidation to which the official members of the Delegation of the Committee on Petitions were subjected during their fact-finding visit to Barcelona from 18 to 20 December 2023, with the aim of assessing in situ the language immersion model in Catalonia, its effects on families moving to and residing in the Autonomous Community, as well as on multilingualism and non-discrimination and the principle of the rule of law;

    11. Condemns the attempted ‘escraches’ (public shaming through doorstep demonstrations), violence and intimidation by separatist entities and groups in Catalonia that were intended to prevent the smooth running of the mission and with which they sought to coerce MEPs so that the outcome of the mission would favour their interests;

    12. Regrets that the competent education authorities in the region have not implemented the recommendations issued by the Committee on Petitions in its report of 19 March 2024 following the mission, aimed at protecting the linguistic rights of students and their families;

    13. Recalls that the e-Petition database is an essential internal tool that allows the members of the Committee on Petitions to access all necessary information in order to follow up on the state of play of each petition and to be able to make informed decisions on the treatment of the petitions; notes that the e-Petition database also plays an important role in communication with petitioners;

    14. Recalls the Commission’s commitment to create an interinstitutional IT tool, together with Parliament, with which to share information and documents on all follow-up actions taken on petitions, such as infringement procedures, legislative proposals or replies by national authorities, thus enhancing the transparency and efficiency of the treatment of petitions, which, in a wider context, would contribute to increasing citizens’ trust in the EU institutions and the European project;

    15. Recalls that cooperation with other committees in Parliament is essential for the comprehensive treatment of petitions; notes that in 2023, 34 requests for opinion (corresponding to 31 petitions) and 223 requests for information were sent to other committees; notes that of the 34 opinions requested, only 25 answers were received by the end of 2023 (in 14 cases an opinion was provided, while in 10 cases the committee decided not to draft an opinion and on four occasions no official decision has been communicated); recalls that petitioners are informed of decisions to request opinions from other committees for the treatment of their petitions; underlines that parliamentary committees should step up their efforts to actively contribute to the examination of petitions by providing their expertise so as to enable Parliament to respond more swiftly and comprehensively to citizens’ concerns;

    16. Believes that the petitions network is a useful tool for facilitating the follow-up of petitions in parliamentary and legislative work; trusts that regular meetings of the petitions network are crucial in order to ensure more visibility for the Committee on Petition’s activities and a better understanding of its work and mission, as well as to strengthen cooperation with the other parliamentary committees;

    17. Underlines that the Committee on Petitions expressed its position on important issues raised in petitions by adopting its report on the outcome of the Committee on Petitions’ deliberations during 2022[1];

    18. Highlights a slight decrease in the number of petitions submitted on external relations issues compared to 2022; notes that this could be explained by the new geopolitical context in 2023 and in particular a decrease in the number of petitions on the war in Ukraine and a significant increase in petitions dealing with the new conflicts in the Middle East; notes that the Committee on Petitions took account of citizens’ concerns about sanctions, security, conflict resolution, visa policy, progress of EU candidate countries, among other issues, putting on its agenda a number of petitions dealing in particular with questions related to the situation of refugees, in particular of children and on the situation of Venezuelan refugees in the EU; acknowledges the efforts of the committees already actively addressing these issues and emphasises that the Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice, and Home Affairs should take note of these petitions in their deliberations;

    19. Takes note that health, which was one of the main areas of concern for petitioners in 2022, appeared to continue to play an important role in 2023; notes, in particular, that the Committee on Petitions examined and discussed petitions on the ban on chemicals and heavy metals in children’s toys, on support for healthy and environmentally friendly food systems and lifestyles and on the implementation of EU regulations on added sugars in foods intended for infants and young children;

    20. Draws attention to the significant number of petitions submitted and discussed in relation to citizens’ concerns over the reintroduction of border checks between some Member States raising the problematic aspect of limitation of the free movement of persons within the EU and other aspects such as the strengths and the weaknesses of the extension of the Schengen area, as well as the costs of not belonging to the Schengen area; appreciates the significant role played by the Committee on Petitions, in particular the host of activities carried out, the adoption in committee of a short motion for a resolution on the accession to the Schengen area on 27 June 2023 and the related Parliament resolution, to strongly support the enlargement of the Schengen area to include Romania and Bulgaria the organisation of the public hearing on Schengen Borders on 18 July 2023 in association with the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs; welcomes the unanimous decision by the Council for the full membership of both countries of the Schengen area as of 1 January 2025 allowing the full exercise of the fundamental freedoms of the EU Single Market; 

    21. Takes note of the sudden increase in petitions of Spanish origin in the second half of 2023 concerning the risks to the rule of law in Spain as a result of the Spanish Government’s intention to adopt an Amnesty Law contrary to constitutional and European law;

    22. Underlines the work of the Committee on Petitions in connection with petitions relating to common rules on a single standard for hand luggage dimensions, highlighting citizens’ concerns about the inconvenience and discomfort caused by inconsistent rules on airline carry-on luggage and the resulting hidden costs; emphasises its call for compliance with a relevant European Court of Justice ruling in the context of the revision of EU air services legislation; points, in this regard, to the short motion for a resolution on standardised dimensions for carry-on luggage adopted by the Committee on Petitions on 20 September 2023 followed by the adoption of a resolution by single vote of the European Parliament on 4 October 2023; welcomes the fact that in November 2023 the Commission put forward a review of the passenger rights framework and a series of proposals designed to improve the experience of passengers and travellers, including the requirement of a limited number of common sizes and weights to reduce the confusion; notes with regret that passengers with disabilities are still facing too many barriers while travelling, especially in case of multimodal journeys; regrets that the public transport systems of many Member States do not comply with the requirements of United Nations Convention on the Rights for Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD);

    23. Notes that environmental issues remained an area of serious concern for petitioners in 2023 with more than 21 % of petitions dedicated to environmental issues; regrets that some of these petitions allege incorrect implementation of EU legislation by the Member States, with some Member States already facing infringement procedures for the breach of EU environmental laws; notes that numerous petitions describe complaints about air quality, noise pollution, waste management/treatment, the deterioration of natural ecosystems and violation of the Habitats Directive in different Member States; highlights the public hearing on the state of implementation of the Habitats Directive organised on 24 May 2023; notes the work the Committee on Petitions continued to carry out in 2023 on the impact of climate change in different fields, not only in the environmental area, but also in the use of land, putting a number of petitions received on these topics on the agenda; points to the workshop on the impact of climate change on social security and the most vulnerable groups organised on 22 March 2023 and also to the presentation of the study on compensation for victims of climate change disasters on 18 July 2023;

    24. Draws attention to the workshop organised by the Committee on Petitions on 25 January 2023 on transparency of pricing and reimbursement of medicinal products, which discussed transparency from the perspectives of patients and consumers, producers of medicinal products, and academic research; notes that the discussions focused on research and development costs of companies and information available on the prices paid for medicines, underlining the importance of transparency on these issues;

    25. Stresses the importance of delivering on EU citizens’ expectations regarding the protection of the environment and urges the Commission, together with the Member States, to ensure the correct implementation of EU legislation in the environmental field, in particular in the field of illegal logging; points to the petitions on environmental issues, which reflect a growing public concern about the implications of climate change, requiring consistent enforcement of the existing EU environmental legislation by both the Commission and the Member States;

    26. Acknowledges the positive effects of the fact-finding visit to Romania from 15 to 18 May 2023 on the management and protection of the brown bear population; notes with regret, however, that there are still too many fatal accidents caused by brown bears in connection with humans and livestock, making further monitoring and cooperation with the national authorities necessary;

    27. Following the fact-finding visit to Romania, stresses the need for a balance between wildlife protection and the citizens’ safety; underlines that each Member State should be allowed to take measures, including population control of the species, in order to prevent threats to the lives and property of its citizens;

    28. Stresses the commitment of the Committee on Petitions to protect the rights of persons with disabilities; recalls the annual workshop of held by the Committee on Petitions on 29 November 2023 on the rights of persons with disabilities; recalls that its first part focused on how persons with disabilities dealt with the recent crises (energy costs, war, high inflation, etc.) and how EU measures helped to overcome these obstacles while the second part addressed the issue of how the European institutions have built inclusive communication with citizens with disabilities; also highlights, in this context, the adoption by the Committee of an opinion in the form of a letter on establishing the European Disability Card and the European Parking Card for persons with disabilities on 29 November 2023; reiterates that the Commission should address the cases where the national authorities refuse to recognise the rights for social security benefits for person with disabilities, thus leaving them without the necessary means to cover their basic needs; underlines as well in this context the imperative need for a full and consistent transposition of the European Accessibility Act and calls on the Member States to avoid further delays that hinder the rights of persons with disabilities; recalls that the Accessibility Act aims at improving the life of at least 87 million persons with disabilities, facilitating their access to, inter alia, public transport, banking services, computers, TVs, e-books and online shops;

    29. Stresses the important contribution made by the Committee on Petitions to the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities, as revealed by its treatment of a number of petitions on this sensitive topic; acknowledges, in this context, the efforts of Parliament’s services and notes that not just the best technical but the most accessible solution for deaf citizens must be found in order to communicate with them in their own mother tongue, in national sign languages; requests the modification of the Rules of Procedures in close cooperation with the Committee on Constitutional Affairs (AFCO) committee in order to eliminate the written communication with deaf citizens; also highlights, in this context, the adoption by the Committee of an opinion in the form of a letter on establishing the European Disability Card and the European Parking Card for persons with disabilities on 29 November 2023;

    30. Underlines, furthermore, the specific protection role played by the Committee on Petitions within the EU in the framework of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities through its capacity to hear petitions and highlights the committee’s important ongoing work on petitions concerning disability-related issues; while noting a slight decrease in the number of petitions on disability in 2023 compared to 2022, stresses that the number nearly doubled compared to 2021; further points out that discrimination and access to public transport and employment, continue to be major challenges faced by persons with disabilities and emphasises the Committee’s special attention to the request for the European Disability Statute to recognise the rights of people with autism; welcomes the adoption of a short motion for a resolution on harmonising the rights of autistic people, emphasising the need to improve access to diagnosis, healthcare, education, employment, accessibility and provision of reasonable accommodation, legal capacity and lifelong community support including as regards culture and sport; draws attention, furthermore, to the particular role of the Committee on Petitions in safeguarding the rights of children and their parents, acknowledging numerous petitions received on children’s rights, which require special attention and action; recalls, in this context the provisions of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, in particular the Article 24 thereof on the rights of the child, to allow every child to maintain a personal relationship and direct contact with both of his/her parents, unless that is contrary to the child’s interests; reiterates as well the risk that families with autistic children are being targeted by offers of unproven, potentially harmful and illegal therapies and interventions which may amount to serious physical abuse of children;

    31. Recalls the fact that relations with the European Ombudsman represent one of the responsibilities conferred on the Committee on Petitions by Parliament’s Rules of Procedure; welcomes Parliament’s constructive cooperation with the European Ombudsman, with whom the Committee on Petitions shares the objectives of ensuring the transparency, professionalism and integrity of the EU institutions vis-à-vis European citizens, as well as its involvement in the European Network of Ombudsmen;

    32. Underlines the key work performed by the Committee on Petitions on the protection of workers’ rights; underlines that several petitions received in this area were followed up by further actions such as the debate on the use of fixed-term contracts, as well as that on the European citizens’ initiative-turned petition ‘Good Clothes, Fair Pay’ focusing on the harmful situation of workers in the global garment and footwear industry, or the Parliamentary Question for Oral Answer on the Working conditions of teachers in the European Union, also having as its basis a petition received on this subject; reiterates the importance of ensuring fair working conditions and greater protection of workers in the EU, calling on the Member States and the Commission to effectively address concerns raised in petitions related to labour rights and trade unions; 

    33. Recalls the European Parliament study on Homelessness in the EU which was commissioned by the Committee on Petitions and presented at its meeting in November 2023; notes that this study made an important contribution on this pressing social and economic challenge, which represents one of the most severe forms of societal exclusion, highlighting the need for a public policy change towards preventing homelessness in the first place, inter alia by providing secure and affordable housing;

    34. Acknowledges the European Ombudsman’s regular contributions to the work of the Committee on Petitions throughout the year; firmly believes that the Union’s institutions, bodies and agencies must ensure consistent and effective follow-up to the recommendations of the Ombudsman;

    35. Stresses that European citizens’ initiatives (ECIs) represent an important instrument for active citizenship and public participation; welcomes the discussion in some meetings of unsuccessful ECIs, which were sometimes subsequently reformulated as petitions, giving citizens the opportunity to present their ideas and hold a constructive debate, while contributing to their participation in the EU’s democratic processes; takes note of the significant number of new ECIs registered by the Commission in 2023, which shows that citizens are seizing the opportunity to use participatory instruments to have a say in policy and lawmaking processes; calls on the Commission to better engage with citizens and give adequate follow-up to successful ECIs; welcomes the important effort put in place to organise, in association with other committees, four public hearings on successful ECIs, which allowed the organisers to present the initiative’s objectives and engage with Members of the European Parliament and representatives of the European Commission; underlines that the Commission’s commitment to responding to valid ECIs is essential to maintaining citizens’ trust in the ECI as the most significant instrument of participatory democracy;

    36. Urges the Commission to give due consideration to the parliamentary resolutions adopted on European Citizens’ Initiatives (ECIs) and to enhance its engagement with citizens, particularly by ensuring appropriate and effective follow-up to successful ECIs, thereby reinforcing the democratic process and ensuring that citizens’ voices are adequately reflected in EU policymaking;

    37. Underlines that the Petitions Web Portal is an essential tool for ensuring a smooth, efficient and transparent petitions process; welcomes, in this regard, the improvements to data protection and security features that have made the portal more user-friendly and secure for citizens; stresses that efforts to make the portal more accessible must be continued, including making it more accessible for sign-language users and persons with disabilities; notes that the Petitions Web Portal has been one of the European Parliament’s most visited websites, thus serving as a first point of contact with Parliament for many EU citizens;

    38. Recalls the European dimension of the Committee on Petitions, which can be addressed by citizens from all 27 Member States on issues that fall within the scope of the Union’s activities; believes that the Committee has a special responsibility to uphold this European dimension and to demonstrate the added value of European unity and integration to citizens and continue addressing issues related to violations of EU law, as well as loopholes and shortcomings in the provisions of existing EU law; believes that timely avoidance of petitions with clear national competences along with comprehensive explanations and instructions about alternative courses of action, where appropriate, could contribute to a constructive approach and an enhanced citizens engagement considers, in this context, that the European Parliament should increase its efforts to promote the role and work of its Committee on Petitions and raise awareness among all EU citizens of the possibility to address a petition to the European Parliament; recalls that due to the limited time allotted to committee meetings, most petitions are treated through written procedure; recalls, in this context, that all petitions received, including those in the area of international affairs, should be handled with the necessary transparency and impartiality; is of the opinion that the selection of petitions for discussion in committee should reflect a geographical and political balance of submissions received; believes, moreover, that geographical balance should also be sought when organising the committee’s fact-finding visits, yearly and over the course of each legislative term;

    39. Welcomes the adoption of the short motion for a resolution on the creation of a European Capital of Local Trade[2] at the plenary session of January 2023; underlines that this achievement is an excellent result for the Committee on Petitions, noting that this project has been successfully included as a preparatory action in the 2024 budget, with a total budget of EUR 3 million; recalls that the project to create a European Capital of Small Retail (ECSR) was officially presented by the Commission in Barcelona in December 2023;

    40. Instructs its President to forward this resolution and the report of the Committee on Petitions to the Council, the Commission, the European Ombudsman, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States, their petitions committees and their national ombudsmen or similar competent bodies.

     

    EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

    Pursuant to Rule 233(7) of the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament, the Committee on Petitions shall report annually on the outcome of its deliberations. The report aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the work carried out by the committee in 2023 and includes a statistical analysis of the petitions received and processed as well as a stocktaking of other parliamentary activities such as the adoption of reports and opinions, the organisation of hearings and the committee’s relations with other EU institutions. It is worth recalling that the core work of the Committee on Petitions generates from the right to petition the European Parliament exercised by EU citizens and residents under Article 227 TFEU and is not directly linked to the work programme of the Commission.

     

    In 2023, following the decision taken in 2022, all the measures put in place in the European Parliament in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic aiming at ensuring Parliament’s core functions were confirmed. All committee meetings in 2023 took place in Parliament’s premises, with the participation of MEPs, as well as of Commission’s representatives, in person. Petitioners have had the possibility to participate remotely or in person.

     

    Statistical analysis of petitions received in 2023 compared to 2022

     

    According to the statistics, the European Parliament received 1 452 petitions in 2023, which represents an increase by 16.0 % compared to the 1217 petitions submitted in 2022 and by 4.0 % compared to the 1392 petitions registered in 2021. The number of petitions on COVID-19 has significantly decreased compared to the two previous years: 12 petitions on 2023 compared to 45 petitions in 2022 and 242 petitions in 2021.

     

    Users of the Petitions Web Portal have the possibility to support petitions. In 2023, 26331 users acted as supporters as compared to 2022, 22441 and 209272 in 2021. It follows, that in 2023 the number of users supporting petitions in the web portal slightly increased in comparison with the previous year. The number of supports increased in 2023, reaching 29287 compared to 27927 in 2022 but incomparably lower compared to the 217876 in 2021;

     

    In 2023, 11 petitions were co-signed by more than one citizen. Of the 11 petitions signed by more than one citizen, only 1 was signed by more than 100 citizens; of those 11 petitions, only 1 was signed by more than 500 citizens and none by more than 5000 citizens;

     

    Format of petitions

    In 2023, 82.4 % of petitions were submitted via the Petitions Web Portal, while almost 17.6 % of petitions were submitted by post. The figures in the two tables reveal that in 2023 the proportion of petitions submitted via the Petitions Web Portal slightly increased in comparison with 2022, the Petitions Web Portal remaining by far the most used channel for submitting citizens’ petitions to the European Parliament.

     

     

     

     

    2023

     

     

     

    2022

    Petition Format

    Number of petitions

    %

    Petition format

    Number of petitions

    %

     

     

    Petition Portal

     

    1186

    82.4

    Petitions Portal

    962

    79.05

    Letter

     

    254

    17.6

    Letter

    255

    20.95

    The following table shows the status of petitions from 2003 to 2023. It can be noted that in 2023, a very large majority (⅔) of petitions were closed within a year after being received and examined by the committee. As a result of the comparison with the data on the status of petitions included in the annual reports from 2010 to 2022, it can be concluded that a significantly majority of petitions are closed within a year after being received and examined. Except for the year 2023 and partially for year 2016, less than 11% of the petitions received each year since 2003 and very small percentages (from 0.2% to 1.5%) of petitions from 2004 to 2014 remain open. Most of these open petitions relate to environmental issues and ongoing infringement proceedings before the Court of Justice of the European Union or to issues that members of the committee want to follow closely. An important number of petitions on the beach concessions in Italy (in total 450) have been submitted from 2012 to 2023, with a high number in 2016 and 2023 and are still open with a relevant impact on the statistics.

    Status of petitions

     

    Year

     

    Number of petitions

     

    Open petitions

     

     

    Closed petitions

    2023

    1 452

    334

    23.2%

    1 106

    76.8%

    2022

    1 210

    142

    11.7%

    1 068

    88.3%

    2021

    1 388

    154

    11.1%

    1 234

    88.9%

    2020

    1 570

    141

    9.0%

    1 429

    91.0%

    2019

    1 355

    113

    8.3%

    1 242

    91.7%

    2018

    1 219

    110

    9.0%

    1 109

    91.0%

    2017

    1 270

    57

    4.5%

    1 213

    95.5%

    2016

    1 568

    249

    15.9%

    1 319

    84.1%

    2015

    1 431

    64

    4.5%

    1 367

    95.5%

    2014

    2 715

    38

    1.4%

    2 677

    98.6%

    2013

    2 891

    33

    1.1%

    2 858

    98.9%

    2012

    1 986

    26

    1.3%

    1 960

    98.7%

    2011

    1 414

    14

    1.0%

    1 400

    99.0%

    2010

    1 656

    14

    0.8%

    1 642

    99.2%

    2009

    1 924

    5

    0.3%

    1 919

    99.7%

    2008

    1 886

    12

    0.6%

    1 874

    99.4%

    2007

    1 506

    15

    1.0%

    1 491

    99.0%

    2006

    1 021

    2

    0.2%

    1 019

    99.8%

    2005

    1 016

    2

    0.2%

    1 014

    99.8%

    2004

    1 002

    2

    0.2%

    1 000

    99.8%

    2003

    1 315

    0

    0.0%

    1 315

    100.0%

     

    Outcome of petitions[3]

     

    2023

     

     

     

    2022

    Outcome of petitions

    Number

    %

    Outcome of petitions

    Number

    %

     

     

    Admissible and Closed

    677

    46.65

    Admissible and Closed

    527

    43.48

    Admissible and Open

    334

    23.00

    Admissible and Open

    327

    26.98

    Inadmissible

    429

    29.55

    Inadmissible

    357

    29.46

    Withdrawn

    13

    0.8

    Withdrawn

    5

    0.08

    Sent to EC for opinion

    572

    55.21

    Sent to EC for opinion

    482

    37.57

    Sent for opinion to other bodies

    12

    1.16

    Sent for opinion to other bodies

    12

    0.94

    Sent for information to other bodies

    452

    43.63

    Sent for information to other bodies

    789

    61.5

     

    The tables show that the petitions declared inadmissible in 2023 vs 2022 is significantly higher in terms of number but as percentage, the petitions declared inadmissible in 2023 remained stable as compared to 2022.

    The percentage of admissible petitions (46.65%), which were closed immediately by providing information to the petitioner in 2023, is slightly higher as compared to 2022. The percentage of petitions that have been kept open in 2023 (23.00%) have slightly decreased compared to 2022 (26.98%).

    It is also to be noted that in 2023, more than the half (55.21 %) of the admissible petitions were sent to the Commission for opinion.

    Finally, the percentage of petitions sent to other bodies for opinion remained the same in 2023 as compared to 2022.

    Number of petitions by country

    The following two tables illustrate in numbers and in percentage terms changes of petitions by country from 2022 to 2023. A large number of petitions submitted in both years concern the EU. It means that these petitions either raise EU-wide issues or call for common measures to be implemented throughout the EU. Petitions concerning the EU may also relate to one or more Member States and are therefore registered under both the EU and the concerned Member State(s). This explains why the sum of the petitions concerning the EU and of those only related to Member States exceeds the total number of petitions submitted in 2022 and 2023.

    Additionally, it is worth stressing that the six countries mostly concerned by petitions remained the same in both years although the order of the most concerned countries has changed in 2023 compared to 2022, (Italy in 2023 takes the second seat occupied by Germany in 2022 and Greece takes the sixth seat in 2023 occupied by Poland in 2022). The majority of petitions submitted in 2023 concern Spain, with a relevant increase in terms of numbers in comparison with 2022. It is interesting to note the very significant increase in the number of petitions concerning Italy (from 101 to 202) and Portugal (from 17 to 38), and an opposite flow of the number of petitions related to Greece, with a decrease from 71 to 53. A relevant aspect to underline is that the number of petitions related to France, increased (from 39 to 53) in comparison with 2022.

    By contrast, petitions concerning non-EU countries decreased significantly in 2023 compared to petitions submitted in 2022 (from 226 to 176).

    As regards the countries featuring at the bottom of the list, Slovakia, Cyprus and Luxembourg, are the least concerned countries in 2023, while in 2022 it was the case for Czechia, Estonia and Slovakia.

     

     

    2023

     

     

     

     

    2022

     

    Concerned Country

    Petitions

    %

     

    Concerned Country

    Petitions

    %

    European Union

    660

    45.8

     

    European Union

    566

    46.7

    Spain

    267

    18.5

     

    Spain

    199

    16.4

    Italy

    202

    14.0

     

    Germany

    139

    11.5

    Germany

    120

    8.3

     

    Italy

    101

    8.3

    Romania

    65

    4.5

     

    Greece

    71

    5.9

    France

    53

    3.7

     

    Romania

    59

    4.9

    Greece

    53

    3.7

     

    Poland

    54

    4.5

    Poland

    53

    3.7

     

    France

    39

    3.2

    Portugal

    38

    2.6

     

    Hungary

    20

    1.7

    Hungary

    24

    1.7

     

    Ireland

    19

    1.6

    Other EU countries

    193

    13.3

     

    Other EU countries

    143

    11.9

    Non-EU countries

    176

    12.2

     

    Non-EU countries

    226

    18.6

     

    Languages of petitions

    In 2023 and in 2022, petitions were submitted in 22 of the official languages of the European Union. English and Spanish were the most used languages in both 2022 and 2023, with Spanish re-confirmed as the second most used language, after English. Italian gained a position and became the third most used language in 2023, to the detriment of German which is the fourth in 2023. The tables illustrate that English continued to account for more than ¼ of the total of petitions submitted and that English, Spanish, Italian and German languages account for more than ¾ of the petitions received in 2023 and 2022 (77.5% and 76.2% respectively). Slovak, Estonian and Croatian were the least used languages in 2023 while in 2022 it was the case of Slovenian, Czech and Croatian.

     

     

     

     

    2023

     

     

     

    2022

     

    Petition Language

    Number of petitions

    %

     

    Petition Language

    Number of petitions

    %

    English

    382

    26.5

     

    English

    325

    26.7

    Spanish

    301

    20.9

     

    Spanish

    251

    20.6

    Italian

    224

    15.6

     

    German

    215

    17.6

    German

    209

    14.5

     

    Italian

    138

    11.3

    French

    74

    5.1

     

    French

    58

    4.8

    Polish

    49

    3.4

     

    Polish

    56

    4.6

    Greek

    47

    3.3

     

    Greek

    43

    3.5

    Romanian

    44

    3.1

     

    Romanian

    42

    3.5

    Others

    110

    7.6

     

    Others

    89

    7.3

    Total

    1440

    100

     

    Total

    1217

    100

     

    Nationality of petitioners

    As regards nationality, while petitions submitted by Spanish citizens represented the highest number in 2023 confirming not only the first place of the 2022 but also registering an important increase (from 266 to 330), Italian citizens exceeded German petitioners and became the second nationality in submitting petitions in 2023 with a significant increase (from 159 to 254).

     

    In addition, the tables below show a slight rise in the number of petitions submitted by Portuguese nationals in 2023 in comparison with the previous year. By contrast, the number of petitions by Hungarian citizens sensibly decreased in 2023, from 33 submitted in 2022 to 21 in 2023.

     

    Two additional observations: in 2023, the number of petitions submitted by other EU nationalities increased significantly compared to 2022, from 170 to 209, and petitions submitted by non-EU nationalities slightly decreased, accounting for 3% of the total.

     

     

    2023

     

     

     

    2022

     

    Prime petitioner nationality

    Number of petitions

    %

     

    Prime petitioner nationality

    Number of petitions

    %

    Spain

    330

    22.9

     

    Spain

    266

    21.9

    Italy

    254

    17.6

     

    Germany

    251

    20.7

    Germany

    246

    17.1

     

    Italy

    159

    13.1

    Romania

    93

    6.5

     

    Romania

    78

    6.4

    France

    71

    4.9

     

    Poland

    73

    6.0

    Poland

    64

    4.4

     

    France

    60

    5.0

    Greece

    62

    4.3

     

    Greece

    60

    5.0

    Portugal

    39

    2.7

     

    Hungary

    33

    2.7

    Belgium

    29

    2.0

     

    Portugal

    26

    2.1

    Other EU nationalities

     

    209

     

    14.6

     

    Other EU nationalities

     

     

    170

     

    13.9

    Non-EU nationalities

    43

    3.0

     

    Non-EU nationalities

    49

    4.0

     

    Main subjects of petitions

     

    The tables below include the top ten petition themes. From the tables, it appears that the main themes did not differ from one year to another. While in 2022 environment, fundamental rights and justice were the top three petition themes, in 2023 environment, internal market as well as fundamental rights ranked the highest.

    In 2023 the number of petitions raising concerns over the internal market had a significant increase compared to 2022 (194 vs 84), which represent more than the double. This could be explained by the high number of petitions related to the beach concessions in Italy submitted in 2023.

    As regard petitions on health, their number in 2023 (119) remained stable compared to the 115 petitions registered under the same theme in 2022. In the field of the external relations, a slight decrease can be noted, explained by a decrease of the number of petitions on the Ukraine’s war and a significant increase of petitions dealing with the new conflict in the Middle East.

    As far as fundamental rights theme is concerned, the number of petitions on this topic is stable in 2023 compared to 2022. This might be due to the fact that in 2023, an important number of petitions (40) registered under the theme of fundamental rights raised concerns over the respect of the rule of law in Spain.

    2023

     

    2022

    Top 10 Petition themes

    Number of petitions

    %

    Environment

    308

    21.5

    Internal Market

    194

    13.4

    Fundamental Rights

    193

    13.4

    Personal Matter

    179

    12.4

    Justice

    167

    11.6

    Health

    119

    8.3

    External Relations

    96

    6.7

    Consumer’s Right

    93

    6.5

    Transport

    93

    6.5

    Constitutional Affairs

    68

    4.7

    Top 10 Petition themes

    Number of petitions

    %

    Environment

    258

    21.2

    Fundamental Rights

    211

    17.4

    Justice

    189

    15.6

    External Relations

    126

    10.4

    Personal Matter

    126

    10.4

    Health

    115

    9.5

    Employment

    73

    6.0

    Consumer’s right

    66

    5.4

    Institutions

    63

    5.2

    Energy

    61

    5.0

     

    Petitions Web Portal

    In 2023, the Petitions Web Portal, launched in late 2014, was further improved to make it more user-friendly, more secure and more accessible to petitioners.

    The Petitions Web Portal was revamped and relaunched in February 2023 to align with modern expectations and make it easier for EU27 residents to exercise their right to submit petitions to the European Parliament. The updated PETI Portal 2.0 integrated seamlessly with the EP’s web publishing tool, enabling faster and simpler content updates. Its responsive design ensured compatibility with all devices and screen sizes. New features included four ‘Quick Start Guides’ – available in all 24 EU official languages – that provide clear, step-by-step instructions for submitting, tracking and supporting petitions. Additionally, a new search engine powered by elastic search technology enhanced user experience by delivering more accurate results efficiently. The new portal prioritises a truly citizen-centred approach.

     

    In April 2023, the PETI Portal 2.0 was presented to an extended Steering Committee (comprising group advisers and DG IPOL Strategy and Innovation representatives). Updates on releases, petition statistics and a communication strategy to boost the portal’s visibility were also discussed. Moreover, the portal was actively promoted through various media channels, including Europarl, Twitter, the Director-General’s newsletter and events such as the Open Doors Day.

     

    The automatic notification system has been extended and improved to inform petitioners and supporters by email – if they have opted in – when a reply from the European Commission (“Communication to Members” or “CM”) has been published and translated into the petition’s original language and the other languages of the Committee.

     

    The PETI Portal team ensured that all petitions were published within days of their adoption and promptly responded to numerous petitioner queries – across all EU languages – received through the chatbot and Smart Helpdesk.

     

    Relations with the Commission

    The Commission remains the natural partner of the Committee on Petitions in processing petitions as the responsible EU institution for ensuring the implementation of and compliance with EU law. The committee and the Commission have a well-established and consistently maintained level of cooperation. The main contact point in the Commission is the Secretariat-General, which coordinates the distribution of petitions to the relevant Commission’s services and transmits the Commission’s replies to the secretariat of the committee. The Commission’s services participate in the meetings of the Committee of Petitions when petitions are discussed in committee on the basis of the Commission’s written reply or of other documents received. While the Commission has stepped up its efforts to provide timely responses to requests for information made by the Committee on Petitions, the committee believes that the Commission should be more actively involved in the work of the Committee on Petitions in order to ensure that petitioners receive a precise response to their requests and complaints regarding the implementation of EU law.

    Additionally, the committee reiterated its calls for regular updates on developments in infringement proceedings and EU pilot procedures, which relate to open petitions. Finally, the committee remains critical as regards the Commission’s new enforcement policy based on in its 2016 communication entitled ‘EU Law: Better Results through Better Application’ (C(2016)8600), which aims to direct citizens to the national level when complaints or petitions do not raise issues of wider principle or systematic failure to comply with EU law. In this regard, the committee considers that the Commission should check whether national authorities take the necessary steps to respond to citizens’ concerns as expressed in their petitions.

    Pursuing to the Annex IV of the Framework Agreement on relations between the European Parliament and the European Commission on the Timetable for the Commission’s Work Programme and as part of the annual cycle of the structured dialogue, the Committee on Petition welcomed the remote participation of Vice-President of the European Commission for Interinstitutional Relations and Foresight Maroš Šefčovič at its meeting on 28 February 2023. The exchanges of views focused on the state of implementation of the Commission Work Programme as well as on the cooperation between the Petitions Committee and the European Commission on improving relations in the handling of petitions.

    It is also worth noting the Commission’s intervention in the Committee on Petitions’ events throughout the year. In particular the intervention of representatives of the Commission during the presentation of the following studies: study on ‘The boundaries of the Commission’s discretionary powers when handling petitions and potential infringements of EU law’ (Implementation & Enforcement of EU Law) on 26 April 2023; study on “Cross-Border Legal Recognition of Parenthood in the EU” (DG JUST) on 17 July 2023; study on “Compensation for Victims of climate change disasters” (DG CLIMA) on 18 July 2023; study on “Homelessness in the European Union” (DG EMPL) on 30 November 2023.

    Representatives of the Commission also participated in several PETI hearings in 2023: public hearing on “The impact of climate change on social security and the most vulnerable groups” organised on 22 March (DG EMPL), hearing on “The state of implementation of the Habitats Directive” on 24 May 2023 (DG ENV.E – implementation and relations with Member States) with a focus on the infringement actions brought in the context of the Habitat Directive; hearing in association with Committee on Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs on “Schengen Borders – issues raised by petitioners” (DG HOME – Unit of Schengen and External Borders) with a focus on “Historical overview: establishment of the Schengen agreement, its progressive extension and the transfer of the Schengen acquis to the EU competence” on 18 July 2023; hearing on “A reflection on the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions and the petitions’ systems of third countries” on 24 October 2023.

    Finally, on 29 November 2023, in the annual workshop on the rights of persons with disabilities focusing on “Coping with the cost-of-living crisis and Inclusive communication”, Helena DALLI, the former European Commissioner for Equality intervened via a recorded video statement followed by representatives of DG Communication.

    ECI

    The European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) is a European Union (EU) mechanism aimed at increasing direct democracy by enabling “EU citizens to participate directly in the development of EU policies”. The initiative enables one million citizens of the European Union, who are nationals of at least seven member states, to call directly on the European Commission to propose a legal act in an area where the member states have conferred powers onto the EU level. If at the end of the procedure, the ECI initiative reaches the threshold, organisers are invited to a hearing organised by the committee for petitions, to present their initiative, and afterwards, Parliament may decide to debate further and adopt a resolution on plenary on the topic.

     

    On 24 January 2023, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI) jointly with the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) and with the association of the PETI Committee, held a public hearing on the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) “Save bees and farmers! Towards a bee-friendly agriculture for a healthy environment”. The initiative requests the phasing out of synthetic pesticides by 2035, a broader support to farmers and the development of the agriculture by prioritising small scale, diverse and sustainable farming, supporting a rapid increase in agro-ecological and organic practice, and enabling independent farmer-based training and research into pesticide. The former Commissioner for the Environment, Oceans and Fisheries Virginijus Sinkevicius and the former Commissioner for agriculture Janusz Wojiechowski presented their points of view on the different topics, showing the need for legislators to work together with all the stakeholder groups.

     

    On 27 March 2023, the Committee on Fisheries (PECH) organised, in association with the Committee on Petitions and the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI), a public hearing on the ECI “Stop Finning – Stop the Trade”. The initiative requests to the Commission to propose legal measures to end the trade of shark and ray fins in the EU, including the import, export and transit of fins, other than if naturally attached to the animal’s body, notably by extending the scope of Regulation (EU) No 605/2013. Former Commissioner for the Environment, Oceans and Fisheries Virginijus Sinkevicius intervened stressing that ECI raises important issues that are relevant to the EU’s policy of protecting the marine environment, protecting and conserving fisheries resources and ensuring sustainable fishing in the EU and globally.

     

    On 25 May 2023, Committee on Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (ENVI) organised in association with the Committee on Petitions and the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI), a public hearing on the ECI “Save cruelty-free cosmetics – Commit to a Europe without animal testing”. The initiative requests three main objectives: protect and strengthen the cosmetics animal testing ban, transform EU chemicals regulation, ensuring human health and the environment by managing chemicals without the addition of new animal testing requirements and modernise science in the EU.

     

    On 12 October 2023, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI) and the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) organised, in association with the Committee on Petitions, a public hearing on the ECI “Fur-Free Europe”. The initiative calls on the EU to ban the rearing and killing of animals for the purpose of fur production. It also asked for a ban on the placing on the Union market of both fur from animals farmed for their fur, as well as products containing such fur. Former Commissioner for Health and Food safety Stella Kyriakides recalled that after a deep technical analysis, the Commission will eventually evaluate the necessity and justification of the bans requested by the ECI’ organisers in pursuing objectives of environmental and public health, of animal health and welfare objectives, in ensuring that consumer concerns can be addressed in practice, as well as in ensuring a smooth operation of the internal market.

     

    Article 230 of the Rules of Procedures of the European Parliament allows the Committee on Petitions, if it considers appropriate, to examine proposed citizens’ initiatives which have been registered in accordance with Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 211/2011, but which cannot be submitted to the Commission in accordance with Article 9 of that Regulation, since not all the relevant procedures and conditions laid down have been complied with. On that basis, the Committee held on 27 April 2023 a debate on the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) “Ensuring Common Commercial Policy conformity with EU Treaties and compliance with international law” with the participation of the organisers and a representative of the Commission and members of the committee. The ECI representatives’ main objective was to invite the Commission to propose a legal acts based on the Common Commercial Policy to prevent EU legal entities from both importing products originating in illegal settlements in occupied territories and exporting to such territories, in order to preserve the integrity of the internal market and to not aid or assist the maintenance of such unlawful situations. Although the ECI ended without reaching the threshold of 1 million signatures, the Committee on Petitions could shed light on it and decide to send the petition to the Committee on International Trade for opinion and to ask the European Commission for an update on this topic.

     

    In accordance with the same article, the Committee held on 24 October 2023 a debate on the European Citizens’ Initiative (ECI) “Good Clothes, Fair Pay”, with the participation of the organisers and a representative of the Commission and members of the committee. The ECI representatives’ main objectives were to invite the Commission to propose legislation, requiring undertakings active in the garment and footwear sector to conduct due diligence in respect of living wages in their supply chain achieving the following objectives: (a) complement and build on the ‘EU’s Sustainable Corporate Governance framework’, and the ‘EU Adequate Minimum Wage Directive’; (b) require undertakings to identify, prevent and mitigate adverse impacts on the human right to a living wage and freedom of association and collective bargaining rights; (c) reduce poverty in the Union and worldwide, paying particular attention to the circumstances of women, migrants and workers with precarious contracts and the need to combat child labour; (d) prohibit unfair trading practices which cause, or contribute to, actual and potential harms to workers in the garment and footwear sector and promote fair purchasing practices; (e) provide a right to information for consumers regarding undertakings in the garment and footwear sector; (f) improve transparency and accountability of undertakings in the garment and footwear sector. Although the ECI ended without reaching the threshold of 1 million signatures, the Committee on Petitions could shed light on it and decide to send the petition to the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs for opinion and to ask the European Commission for an update on this topic.

     

    Relations with the Council

    Members of the Council’s Secretariat may attend the meetings of the Committee on Petitions. Regrettably, in 2023, the committee did not observe Council’s participation in the debates. Nevertheless, the committee notes the participation by some local or regional authorities in the discussion on petitions in committee meetings, which in 2023 concerned mainly Spanish-related topics. Also on 30 November 2023, the committee acknowledges the participation of the Head of the Diversity and Inclusion Office of the Council of the EU at the annual workshop on the rights of persons with disabilities.

     

    Relations with the European Ombudsman

    The Committee on Petitions continued its constructive, long-standing working relations with the office of the European Ombudsman, contributing to the increase of the democratic accountability of the EU institutions.

     

    On 27 June 2023, the committee heard the presentation of the European Ombudsman’s Annual Report 2022, delivered by Ms Emily O’Reilly. The report documented the Ombudsman’s work on transparency and accountability (e.g. access to information and documents), culture and service, respect of fundamental rights, the proper use of discretion (including in infringement procedures), recruitment, good management of personnel issues, respect of procedural rights, sound financial management, ethics and public participation in EU decision-making. In 2022, the Ombudsman opened 348 inquiries, of which four were on her own initiative, while closing 330 inquiries. The largest percentage of inquiries concerned the European Commission (57.1%), followed by the European Personnel Selection Office (6.3%), the European Parliament (5.5%) and the European External Action Service (4.6%). The remaining enquires concerned other EU institutions, agencies and bodies with the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) totalling 4.3% and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency 2%.

     

    It is also worth noting the intervention by inquiries Officer in the Ombudsman’s Strategic Inquiries Team at the committee’s annual workshop on the rights of persons with disabilities which took place on 29 November 2023.

    Relations with the European Court of Auditors

    Over recent years, the Committee on Petitions has built constructive working relations with the European Court of Auditors (ECA) and has actively contributed to its annual work programmes.

    Relations with other EU bodies

    On 22 March 2023 in the frame of the workshop organised by the Committee on Petition on “The impact of climate change on social security and the most vulnerable groups’, the Head of Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation of the European Environment Agency spoke on “Social preparedness for current and future climate risks”.

    On 24 May 2023 in the frame of the workshop organised by the Committee on Petition on “The state of implementation of the Habitats Directive”, a nature and biodiversity expert at the European Environment Agency intervened in the session “How to promote full compliance by Member States of the Habitats Directive?”.

    On 20 September 2023, the Committee on Petitions organised an Interparliamentary Committee Meeting with a focus on the Cooperation with the Committees on Petitions in national Parliaments – Exchanging best practices and reflecting on new approaches and in the Panel 1 on “The right to petitions, Parliaments rules, procedures and practices” several Members of National Parliaments took the floor, in particular a Member of Spanish Senate, a member of Belgian Federal Parliament. In the second Panel titled “Best Practices And New Approaches To The Right To Petition National Parliaments’ Point Of View” some National Members intervened, among others, one Member of Italian Chamber, one Member of German Bundestag, one member of the French Senate and one Member of the Polish Sejm.

    On 24 October 2023, the Committee on Petitions organised a public hearing on “A reflection on the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions and the petitions’ systems of third countries” and in this frame several Members of the extra EU National Parliaments intervened. In particular, two representatives of the House of Commons of Canada presented “An analysis of the legal, institutional and procedural framework governing the petitions’ system in Canada”, followed by a member of Federal Senate of Brazil who analysed ‘the legal, institutional and procedural framework governing the petitions’ system in Brazil’. In the second panel of the hearing, one member of the Norwegian Parliament analysed ‘The legal, institutional and procedural framework governing the petitions’ system in Norway”.

    On 29 November 2023, a representative of the Fundamental Rights Agency took the floor in the first panel of the annual workshop on the rights of persons with disabilities.

    Fact-finding visits

    In 2023, the Committee on Petitions organised four fact-finding visits.

     

    The committee organised a fact-finding visit to Romania (Bucharest, Sfântu Gheorghe and Suceava), from 15 to 18 May 2023, on the management and the protection of the brown bear population as raised in Petitions Nos 1188/2019, 1214/2019, 0685/2020, 0534/2021, 0410/2022 and the illegal logging in the country, petitions Nos. 1248/2019, 0408/2020, 0722/2020 and1056/2021. The aim of the mission was to collect as much information as possible on the two subjects of interest, to establish facts and to seek solutions. In this regard, the delegation met various interlocutors, such as national and regional authorities, petitioners, NGOs, environmental activists, as well as representatives of academia and. Following rich exchanges, Members acquired first-hand information and knowledge about the challenges related to the management and the protection of the brown bear population and to the illegal logging and the fight against it in Romania.

     

    From 13 June to 15 June 2023, two Members of the Committee on Petitions participated in a joint ad hoc EMPL, LIBE and PETI delegation to the 16th session of the Conference of States Parties to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD COSP), which took place at the United Nations Headquarters, New York. Members participating in the delegation took part in several official sessions of the Conference, side events (including one organised by the EP), as well as in a series of bilateral meetings with UN officials, European and non-European governmental and non-governmental organisations, working for the realisation of the rights of persons with disabilities. The main purpose of the delegation was to build on the well-established contacts of the previous year and to highlight and guarantee Parliament’s oversight in the implementation and monitoring of the UN CRPD, within the “Team Europe” cooperation.

     

    A fact-finding visit was organised to the region of Donegal (Ireland) from 30 October to 1 November 2023 on the use of defective mica blocks in construction in Ireland, an alleged non-compliance with the EU Construction Products Regulation (CPR) and on the protection of homeowners as raised on Petitions Nos. 0789/2021, 0790/2021, 0799/2021, 0800/2021, 0801/2021, 0813/2021, 0814/2021 and 0837/2021.During the mission, the delegation was made aware of the large scale and complexity of the challenges related to the use of defective building blocks in construction in Ireland, with significant health, financial and social consequences.

    Between 18 and 20 December 2023, the Committee on Petitions conducted a fact-finding visit to Catalonia (Spain) with the aim of assessing in situ the language immersion model in Catalonia, its impact on families moving to and residing in the region as well as on multilingualism and non-discrimination and the principle of the Rule of Law as raised on petitions Nos. 0858/2017, 0650/2022 and 0826/2022. The objective of this fact-finding visit was to investigate the claims made in the petitions, establish facts, seek solutions and establish a dialogue with regional authorities to obtain a better insight into various aspects concerning the language immersion model in Catalonia. The mission has enabled the Committee to gain a better understanding of the model’s impact on families moving to and residing in the region as well as on multilingualism, non-discrimination and compliance with international and EU law.

    Public Hearings

    In 2023, the Committee on Petitions organised four public hearings, partly jointly with other parliamentary committees. The public hearings covered a wide range of subject raised in petitions.

     

    On 28 February 2023, the Committee on Petitions hosted a public hearing on the “language immersion model in Catalonia, Spain”. The hearing was organised as follow up on several petitions (Nos. 0858/2017and 0650/2022) on the impact of full immersion in Catalan at schools and covered four main themes: the compatibility between European regulations and case law and the linguistic model in Catalonia, the impact of linguistic immersion in Catalonia on the school performance of students whose mother tongue is Spanish, the Catalan linguistic-cultural model and the linguistic immersion in Catalonia, respect for secular bilingualism in Catalonia and compatibility with the linguistic conjunction model.

     

    On 24 May 2023, the Committee on Petitions held, in association with the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety, a public hearing entitled “The state of implementation of the Habitats Directive”. Following a significant number of petitions received alleging the breach of the Habitats Directive, the hearing aimed to take a closer look at how the Habitats Directive has being implemented and enforced in the Member States. It was organised in two sessions, and the experts invited, focused, in particular, on the following topics: implementation and infringement overview, implementation challenges and the infringement procedure as an efficient tool for the enforcement of the Habitats Directive. Furthermore, the speakers identified possible best practices to promote full compliance of Member States with the Habitats Directive.

     

    On 18 July 2023, the Committee on Petitions held, in association with the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs, a public hearing on: ‘Schengen Borders: – issues raised by petitioners’. On the basis of several petitions Nos. 0428/2020, 0653/2020, 0227/2022, 0719/2022, 0004/2023 and 0037/2023 the hearing aimed at giving voice to citizens’ concerns over the reintroduction of border checks between some Member States (e.g. Denmark and Sweden, Denmark and Germany), thus limiting the free movement of persons within the EU. It also touched upon other aspects such as the strengths and the weaknesses, the extension of the Schengen area, as well as the costs of Non-Schengen. The exchanges were organised in two panels, with the first focusing on the historical background and the current state of play of the Schengen area and the second on the issue of reintroduced border controls within the Schengen area. The Commission pointed out the ongoing dialogue with the Member States and the review of the Schengen Borders Code and stressed that the enlargement of the Schengen area remains a priority.

     

    On 24 October 2023, the Committee held the public hearing ‘A reflection on the EP Committee on Petitions and the petitions’ systems of third countries’. The hearing focused on the analysis and comparison of the EU petitions’ system and the petitions’ systems of selected non-European countries with shared democratic values, namely Canada, Brazil and Norway. The aim was to exchange best practices that could inspire the EU petitions’ system to become more efficient and closer to the citizens and to gather evidence on how citizens can bring forward their concerns through petitions. The experts analysed the legal, procedural and institutional framework governing the Canadian, Brazilian and Norwegian petitions’ systems, as well as the differences with the EU system concerning the submission, admissibility, examination and closure of petitions.

    Workshops

    In 2023, the Committee on Petitions organised three workshops covering subject-matters raised in petitions.

     

    On 25 January 2023, the Committee on Petitions held a workshop on “Transparency of pricing and reimbursement of medicinal products”. The workshop discussed transparency from the perspective of patients/consumers, producers of medicinal products, and academic research. The discussions focused on research and development costs of companies and information available on the actual prices paid for medicines. The exchanges concluded that without full transparency on these issues, any discussion on fair medicine prices and access to medicinal products remains highly difficult.

     

    On 22 March 2023, the Committee on Petitions hosted a workshop on “The impact of climate change on social security and the most vulnerable groups”. The workshop focused on the effects of climate change on vulnerable groups in society, such as the elderly, low-income families, and people with disabilities. It also looked into the role attribution science – an area of science that aims to determine which extreme weather events can be explained by or linked to climate change – can play in helping develop (social) policies for the future.

     

    On 29 November 2023, the Committee on Petitions held its “Annual Workshop on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities”, during the first European Parliament’s Disability Rights Week. The workshop focused on two themes: coping with the cost-of-living crisis and on inclusive communication. The first panel looked into the situation of persons with disabilities in the context of recent crises (COVID-19 pandemic, energy crisis and rising inflation) and discussed proposals for measures to overcome obstacles. The second panel debated the European institutions’ efforts to ensure effective communication with and about persons with disabilities, both internally and in their relations with citizens.

    Studies

    In 2023, the committee heard the presentations of the following studies commissioned by the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at its request:

    – Study on ‘FATCA legislation and its application at international and EU level: – An Update’ on 25 January 2023. Professor C. Garbarino described the most relevant developments in the period 2018-2022 in chronological order and drew conclusions, which include a systemic view of the institutional dynamics, a provisional legal analysis on the basis of existing rules and policy suggestions.

    – Study on “Environmental Crime affecting EU financial interest, the economic recovery and the EU’s green deal objectives”, presented by Prof. Dr Michael G. Faure (Professor of comparative and international environmental law at Maastricht University and Professor of comparative private law and economics at Erasmus School of Law in Rotterdam) and Dr. Kévine Kindji, (Research fellow at at the Maastricht European Institute for Transnational Legal Research (METRO) at Maastricht University) on 25 January 2023. The study suggested that despite commendable efforts, the transnational nature of environmental crime and its convergence with organised crime, money laundering and corruption, have not been adequately integrated into current reforms. It concluded that a proper categorization of environmental crime as a ‘serious crime’ was needed as an essential basis for policy reforms;

     

    – Study on ‘The boundaries of the Commission’s discretionary powers when handling petitions and potential infringements of EU law’, presented by Prof. Armin Cuyvers (Leiden University) on 26 April 2023. The study analysed the legal limits on the discretion of the Commission when deciding to launch, or not to launch, an infringement action, especially in response to a petition. In addition, it assessed how the Commission uses this discretion in practice, and formulates recommendations on improved political collaboration between the European Parliament and the Commission, in the interest of EU citizens;

     

    – Study on “Cross-Border Legal Recognition of Parenthood in the EU”, presented by Professor Alina Tryfonidou (Neapolis University) on 17 July 2023. It examined the problem of non-recognition of parenthood between Member States and its causes, the current legal framework and the (partial) solutions it offers to this problem, the background of the Commission proposal, and the text of the proposal. It also provides for a critical assessment of the proposal and issues policy recommendations for its improvement;

     

    – Study on “Compensation for Victims of climate change disasters”, presented by Professor Michael Faure (Maastricht University and Erasmus Universit), on 18 July 2023. The study outlined the dangers and effects of climate change in the EU, as well as the EU policies and mechanisms to deal with climate change disasters. It also analysed the types of compensation available to victims of climate change disasters in the EU and in a representative selection of Member States and formulated several policy recommendations;

     

    – Study on “Homelessness in the European Union” presented by Professor Eoin O’Sullivan, (Trinity College) on 30 November 2023. The study insisted on the need to change systems that respond to homelessness as an issue of individual dysfunction and inadequacy, to systems that actually end homelessness. Public policy should aim to prevent homelessness in the first instance. It highlighted that the duration of homelessness should be minimised by rapidly providing secure, affordable housing, in order to reduce further experiences of homelessness, decrease costly emergency accommodation, and alleviate trauma associated with homelessness.

     

    In addition, in the frame of the Annual Workshop on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities on 29 November 2023, the following study has been presented by Magdi Birtha (European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research):

    – Study on “Targeted measures for persons with disabilities to cope with the cost-of-living crisis”. The study analysed the impact of the ongoing cost-of-living and energy crises on the standard of living for persons with disabilities. Based on available evidence, it provided for an overview on legislation, policy measures and schemes that support persons with disabilities and their families to cope with the rising cost of living at EU level and in selected Member States.

    Key issues

    Internal Market

    It is worth noting the high increase in 2023 in the number of petitions on internal market issues. This rise is in large part due to a high number of petitions submitted on the situation of the beach concessions in Italy in particular on alleged non-compliance with Directive 2006/123/EC on liberalisation of services (‘Bolkestein Directive’). A second major topic is related to the citizens’ concerns over the reintroduction of border checks between some Member States (e.g. Denmark and Sweden, Denmark and Germany), thus limiting the free movement of persons within the EU and other aspects such as the strengths and the weaknesses, the extension of the Schengen area, as well as the costs of Non-Schengen in particular for Romania and Bulgaria.

    The Committee adopted a short motion of resolution on the Accession to the Schengen area on 27 June 2023 and organised a public hearing on Schengen Borders: – issues raised by petitioners on 18 July 2023.

    Fundamental Rights

    Still in 2023, the committee received a high number of petitions on fundamental rights, including alleged breaches of the General Data Protection Regulation in different EU countries and on the respect of the rule of law and democracy.

    In addition, the Committee continued to receive petitions on the violation of the human rights in several third countries and a series of petitions on the fundamental rights of LGBT-EU citizens.

    Other relevant topic concerned the homelessness in the EU, how to deal with this sensitive issue and a study has been presented on November 2023, insisting on the need to change systems that respond to homelessness as an issue of individual dysfunction and inadequacy, to systems that actually end homelessness, with a new role of the public sectors.

    Environmental issues

    In 2023, environmental issues remained high in citizens’ concerns and the committee paid paramount attention to them. The protection of the environment was discussed in almost all committee meetings, on the basis of petitions. Topics such as protection of wildlife and forest policy within the EU have been discussed as well as alleged breaches of the Habitats Directive in some Member States.

    The Committee exanimated also petitions on the protection of the quality of groundwater resources against chemical environmental pollution and on control of the air pollution and air quality safeguarding of the health of the population concerned.

    In addition, the committee held fact-finding visit to Romania (Bucharest, Sfântu Gheorghe and Suceava), in relation to several petitions that raised some issues as the management and the protection of the brown bear population and the illegal logging in the country.

    Other topics submitted to the attention of the PETI committee have concerned alleged breaches of EU environmental law and the new dimension of the climate change. In this frame, the Committee on Petitions held a workshop on the impact of climate change on social security and the most vulnerable groups on March 2023 and in its meeting of July 2023, a study on Compensation for victims of climate change disasters has been presented and discussed.

    The animal welfare became a relevant topic in 2023, with a series of petitions calling for a revision of the legislation on animal welfare and a specific legislation for the protection and management of companion, domestic and stray animals inside the EU. The Committee examined petitions against the cruel treatment of animals in different Member States and proposed to have a Commissioner specifically competent for the animal welfare issues.

    Disability issues

    The Committee on Petitions plays a specific protection role as regards compliance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights for Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) within the policymaking and legislative actions at EU level. Within this responsibility, the committee deals with petitions on disability issues. It is worth stressing that in 2023 the number of petitions on disability (22) slightly decreased in comparison with 2022 but almost doubled as compared to 2021 (28 in 2022 and 13 in 2021). In 2023, the committee continued examining petitions on disability revealing that the main challenges remain discrimination, access to education and employment as well as inclusion. Special attention was given by the committee to Petition No 0822/2022 asking for the European Disability Statute to contemplate the rights of people with autism followed by the approval of a short motion of resolution on the same topic, Petition No 0756/2019 on an EU-wide disability card, Petition No 1056/2016 requesting the European Parliament allow for the tabling of petitions in national sign languages used in the EU as well as Petition No 0569/2023 on the accessibility of public transport for wheelchair users in Belgium.

    From 13 June to 15 June 2023, the Committee on Petitions participated in a joint ad hoc EMPL, LIBE and PETI delegation to the 16th session of the Conference of States Parties to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD COSP), which took place at the United Nations Headquarters, New York. The main purpose of the delegation was to build on the well-established contacts of the previous year and to highlight and guarantee Parliament’s oversight in the implementation and monitoring of the UN CRPD, within the “Team Europe” cooperation. It gave the delegation the opportunity to exchange views and discussed how ensuring equal access to and accessibility of sexual and reproductive health services for persons with disabilities and improve their digital accessibility.

     

    Finally, on 29 November 2023, the Committee hosted the Annual Workshop on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, focusing in the first part on ‘Coping with the cost-of-living crisis’. where the situation of persons with disabilities in the face of recent crises has been presented (the energy crisis following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, together with rising inflation) and some proposals for targeted measures to overcome obstacles have been discussed (EU funds, the European Social Fund Plus and temporary instruments, the Recovery and Resilience Funds (RRF)). In the second panel on ‘Inclusive communication’ the focus was on the efforts made by the European Institutions to ensure effective communication with and about persons with disabilities, both internally and in their relations with citizens.

    Reports, Motions for Resolutions and Opinions

    The Committee on Petitions worked intensely to adopt a considerable number of parliamentary files.

     

    In 2023, the Committee on Petitions adopted three own initiative reports as follows:

     

    – Report on the Activities of the European Ombudsman – Annual Report 2021” (2022/2141(INI)) PETI/9/10044 – Rapporteur: Anne Sophie Pelletier (GUE) – adopted on 28 February 2023;

    Report under Rule 227(7) on the Deliberations of the Committee on Petitions in 2022” (2023/2047(INI)) PETI/9/11741 – Rapporteur: Alex AGIUS SALIBA (S&D) – adopted on 24 October 2023;

    – Report on the Activities of the European Ombudsman – Annual Report 2022” (2023/2120(INI)) PETI/9/12602 – Rapporteur: Peter JAHR (EPP) – adopted on 29 November 2023;

     

    The Committee also adopted the following fact-finding visits mission reports:

     

    – Report of the fact-finding visit to Poland 19-21 September 2022 PETI/9/11016 – adopted on 22 March 2023;

    – Report of the fact-finding visit to Washington D.C. 18-22 July 2022 PETI/9/11015 adopted on 22 March 2023;

    – Report of fact-finding visit to Germany from 3 to 4 November 2022 on the functioning of the “Jugendamt” (Youth Welfare Office) PETI/9/11343 adopted on 26 April 2023;

    – Report of Fact-Finding Visit to Romania from 15 to 18 May 2023 on the management and the protection of the brown bear population and the illegal logging in Romania, as raised in Petitions Nos: 1188/2019, 1214/2019, 0685/2020, 0534/2021, 0410/2022 (the brown bear population), as well as 1248/2019, 0408/2020, 0722/2020, 1056/2021 (the illegal logging) PETI/9/13165 – adopted on 29 November 2023;

     

    In addition, the committee adopted the following Motions for Resolutions:

     

    – Short motion for resolution on the Accession to the Schengen area 2023/2668(RSP), PETI/9/11832 – Rapporteur: Dolors Montserrat (Chair) – adopted on 27 June 2023;

    – Short motion for resolution on Standardised dimensions for carry-on luggage 2023/2774(RSP) PETI/9/12441 – Rapporteur: Dolors Montserrat (Chair) – adopted on 20 September 2023;

    – Short motion for resolution on Harmonising the rights of autistic persons, 2023/2768 (RSP) PETI/9/12151 – Rapporteur: Dolors Montserrat (Chair) – adopted on 20 September 2023;

     

    In 2023, the Committee on Petitions also adopted two opinions, as follows:

     

    – Opinion in form of a letter on Monitoring the application of European Union Law 2020, 2021 and 2022, 2023/2080(INI) PETI/9/12224 – Rapporteur: Loránt Vincze (EPP) – adopted on 20 September 2023;

    – Opinion in form of a letter on Establishing the European Disability Card and the European Parking Card for persons with disabilities, 2023/0311(COD) PETI/9/13175 – Rapporteur: Dolors Montserrat (EPP) – adopted on 29 November 2023;

     

    Finally, the committee adopted the following texts:

     

    – Amendments to the Budget 2024 – adopted on 18 July 2023.

    – Oral Question on Improving the strategic approach on the enforcement of EU Law 2023/2886(RSP) PETI/9/13266 – Rapporteur: Dolors Montserrat (Chair) – adopted on 24 October 2023.

     

    ANNEX: ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT

    The rapporteur declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

    INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

    Date adopted

    8.4.2025

     

     

     

    Result of final vote

    +:

    –:

    0:

    16

    13

    4

    Members present for the final vote

    Peter Agius, Alexander Bernhuber, Damien Carême, Alma Ezcurra Almansa, Gheorghe Falcă, Chiara Gemma, Isilda Gomes, Sandra Gómez López, Cristina Guarda, Paolo Inselvini, Michał Kobosko, Sebastian Kruis, Murielle Laurent, Dolors Montserrat, Valentina Palmisano, Pina Picierno, Bogdan Rzońca, Pál Szekeres, Jana Toom, Nils Ušakovs, Ivaylo Valchev, Anders Vistisen, Maria Zacharia

    Substitutes present for the final vote

    Gordan Bosanac, Hana Jalloul Muro, Elena Nevado del Campo

    Members under Rule 216(7) present for the final vote

    Maravillas Abadía Jover, Adrian-George Axinia, Marieke Ehlers, Tomasz Froelich, Eleonora Meleti, Elena Sancho Murillo, Marion Walsmann

     

     

     

    FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL BY THE COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

    16

    +

    ECR

    Bogdan Rzońca

    PPE

    Maravillas Abadía Jover, Peter Agius, Alexander Bernhuber, Alma Ezcurra Almansa, Gheorghe Falcă, Eleonora Meleti, Dolors Montserrat, Elena Nevado del Campo, Marion Walsmann

    PfE

    Marieke Ehlers, Sebastian Kruis, Pál Szekeres, Anders Vistisen

    Renew

    Michał Kobosko, Jana Toom

     

    13

    ESN

    Tomasz Froelich

    NI

    Maria Zacharia

    S&D

    Isilda Gomes, Sandra Gómez López, Hana Jalloul Muro, Murielle Laurent, Pina Picierno, Elena Sancho Murillo, Nils Ušakovs

    The Left

    Damien Carême, Valentina Palmisano

    Verts/ALE

    Gordan Bosanac, Cristina Guarda

     

    4

    0

    ECR

    Adrian‑George Axinia, Chiara Gemma, Paolo Inselvini, Ivaylo Valchev

     

    Key to symbols:

    + : in favour

     : against

    0 : abstention

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Press release – EP TODAY – Tuesday, 6 May

    Source: European Parliament

    EU response to US tariffs

    From 9:00, MEPs, Commissioner Šefčovič and Polish Minister for EU Affairs Szłapka will discuss how the EU should respond to the tariffs imposed by the US Administration. MEPs will consider the countermeasures adopted by the EU – which were later suspended – and review EU trade opportunities elsewhere in the world.

    Lieven COSIJN

    (+32) 473 86 41 41

    EPTrade

    MEPs’ priorities for the EU’s next long-term budget

    From around 13:00, Parliament will outline its demands and priorities for the EU’s next long-term budget (2028-2034), in a debate with Commissioner Serafin. MEPs are expected to call for a significantly more ambitious long-term budget to reflect EU citizens’ expectations amidst an increasingly complex global landscape. A resolution will be put to a vote by MEPs on Wednesday, followed by a press conference with the co-rapporteurs. An off-the-record technical briefing for journalists will take place on Tuesday after the debate, from 15:30 to16:30.

    Eszter ZALÁN

    (+32) 477 99 20 73

    EP Trade

    EP_Budgets

    Fast-tracking CO2 flexibility measures for car manufacturers: vote

    In a vote at noon, plenary will decide whether to apply its “urgent procedure” to proposed legislation giving car manufacturers more flexibility to comply with C02 emissions requirements. Ahead of the vote, there will be one round of statements from the political group representatives. If MEPs agree to fast-track the proposal, they will vote on its substance on Thursday.

    Dana POPP

    (+32) 470 95 17 07

    EP_Environment

    EP_PublicHealth

    Wolves: MEPs to vote on changing EU protection status

    At noon, MEPs will also decide on whether to apply the “urgent procedure” to draft legislation that would change the EU’s wolf protection status from ‘strictly protected’ to ‘protected’, aligning it with the Bern Convention. If the vote goes through, MEPs will vote on the substance of the proposal on Thursday.

    Thomas HAAHR

    (+32) 470 88 09 87

    EP_Environment

    MEPs to assess EU-Türkiye relations

    In the evening, MEPs and Commissioner Kos will review Türkiye’s accession progress and relations with the EU. The draft text – on which plenary will vote on Wednesday – states that Türkiye’s EU accession process cannot resume under the current circumstances, given the widening values gap between Türkiye and the EU. The rapporteur will hold a press conference on Wednesday morning ahead of the plenary vote.

    Snjezana KOBESCAK SMODIS

    (+32) 470 96 08 19

    EP_Democracy

    EP_ForeignAff

    Viktor ALMQVIST

    (+32) 470 88 29 42

    EP_ForeignAff

    EP_Defence

    EP_HumanRights

    In brief

    Kosovo and Serbia. In the evening, MEPs and Commissioner Kos will evaluate Kosovo and Serbia’s progress towards EU membership. The vote will take place on Wednesday, followed by a press conference.

    Water resilience strategy. In the early evening, Parliament and Commissioner Roswall will debate MEPs’ views on water resilience ahead of the European Commission’s strategy, due in July 2025. The vote is on Wednesday.

    Greenland. In a late afternoon debate with EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas, MEPs are expected to call for the protection of Greenland’s right to decide its own future.

    Budget discharge. From around 15:00, MEPs and Commissioner Serafin will assess the EU’s budget management for 2023, followed by votes on Wednesday.

    Votes

    At noon, MEPs will also vote, among other things, on

    • protecting the EU’s financial interests and combating fraud (2023 annual report);
    • the financial activities of the European Investment Bank (2023 annual report), and
    • EU aid worth €8 million for 2,400 dismissed workers in Belgium.

    Live coverage of the plenary session can be found on Parliament’s webstreaming site and on EbS+.

    For detailed information on the session, please also see our newsletter.

    Find more information regarding plenary.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Universal Periodic Review 49: UK Statement on Türkiye

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    World news story

    Universal Periodic Review 49: UK Statement on Türkiye

    UK Statement on Türkiye, delivered at Türkiye’s Universal Periodic Review at the Human Rights Council in Geneva.

    Thank you, Mr Vice President,

    We recognise efforts by Türkiye to address human rights concerns. The UK urges Türkiye to take further action to uphold freedom of expression, peaceful assembly, and media freedom, in accordance with its international human rights obligations.

    We recommend Türkiye:

    1. Strengthens judicial independence by amending constitutional provisions for appointing members of the Council of Judges and Prosecutors, ensuring peer election and preventing executive interference.

    2. Protects workers’ rights by enhancing legal frameworks for trade unions, prevents harassment and intimidation, and guarantees the right to union activities without reprisals.

    3. Eliminates restrictions on the right to freedom of expression, ensuring no undue interference and allows independent media to operate freely, without fear of censorship.

    Thank you.

    Updates to this page

    Published 6 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: YieldMax™ ETFs Announces Distributions on BIGY ($0.4609) and SOXY ($0.4384)

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO and MILWAUKEE and NEW YORK, May 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — YieldMax™ today announced distributions for the YieldMax™ Target 12™ ETFs listed in the table below. The Fund seeks to generate income with a 12% target annual income level.

    ETF
    Ticker
    1
    ETF Name Distribution Frequency Distribution per Share Distribution
    Rate
    2
    30-Day
    SEC Yield3
    ROC4 Ex-Date & Record Date Payment
    Date
    BIGY YieldMax™ Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF Monthly   $0.4609 12.00% 0.18% 66.89% 5/7/25 5/8/25
    RNTY* YieldMax™ Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF Monthly  
    SOXY YieldMax™ Target 12™ Semiconductor Option Income ETF Monthly $0.4384 12.00% 0.12% 100.00% 5/7/25 5/8/25
                     

    You are not guaranteed a distribution under the ETFs. Distributions for the ETFs (if any) are variable and may vary significantly from period to period and may be zero.

    Investors in the Funds will not have rights to receive dividends or other distributions with respect to the underlying reference asset(s).

    *The inception date for RNTY is April 16, 2025.

    1Each ETF’s strategy will cap potential gains if its reference asset’s shares increase in value, yet subjects an investor to all potential losses if the reference asset’s shares decrease in value. Such potential losses may not be offset by income received by the ETF.

    2The Distribution Rate shown is as of close on May 5, 2025. The Distribution Rate is the annual distribution rate an investor would receive if the most recent distribution, which includes option income, remained the same going forward. The Distribution Rate is calculated by annualizing an ETF’s Distribution per Share and dividing such annualized amount by the ETF’s most recent NAV. The Distribution Rate represents a single distribution from the ETF and does not represent its total return. Distributions may also include a combination of ordinary dividends, capital gain, and return of investor capital, which may decrease an ETF’s NAV and trading price over time. As a result, an investor may suffer significant losses to their investment. These Distribution Rates may be caused by unusually favorable market conditions and may not be sustainable. Such conditions may not continue to exist and there should be no expectation that this performance may be repeated in the future.

    3The 30-Day SEC Yield represents net investment income, which excludes option income, earned by such ETF over the 30-Day period ended April 30, 2025, expressed as an annual percentage rate based on such ETF’s share price at the end of the 30-Day period.

    4ROC refers to Return of Capital. The ROC percentage is the portion of the distribution that represents an investor’s original investment.

    Each Fund has a limited operating history and while each Fund’s objective is to provide current income, there is no guarantee the Fund will make a distribution. Distributions are likely to vary greatly in amount.

    Standardized Performance

    For BIGY, click here. For SOXY, click here. For RNTY, click here.

    Important Information

    This material must be preceded or accompanied by the prospectus. For all prospectuses, click here.

    Tidal Financial Group is the adviser for all YieldMax™ ETFs.

    THE FUND, TRUST, AND ADVISER ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY UNDERLYING REFERENCE ASSET.

    Important Information
    Investors should consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. For a prospectus or summary prospectus with this and other information about each Fund, visit our website at www.YieldMaxETFs.com. Read the prospectus or summary prospectus carefully before investing.

    There is no guarantee that any Fund’s investment strategy will be properly implemented, and an investor may lose some or all of its investment in any such Fund.

    Tidal Financial Group is the adviser for all YieldMax™ ETFs.

    THE FUND, TRUST, AND ADVISER ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY UNDERLYING REFERENCE ASSET.

    Risk Disclosures

    Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.

    Call Writing Strategy Risk. The path dependency (i.e., the continued use) of the Fund’s call writing strategy will impact the extent that the Fund participates in the positive price returns of the underlying reference asset and, in turn, the Fund’s returns, both during the term of the sold call options and over longer periods.

    Counterparty Risk. The Fund is subject to counterparty risk by virtue of its investments in options contracts. Transactions in some types of derivatives, including options, are required to be centrally cleared (“cleared derivatives”). In a transaction involving cleared derivatives, the Fund’s counterparty is a clearing house rather than a bank or broker. Since the Fund is not a member of clearing houses and only members of a clearing house (“clearing members”) can participate directly in the clearing house, the Fund will hold cleared derivatives through accounts at clearing members.

    Derivatives Risk. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, or funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. The Fund’s investments in derivatives may pose risks in addition to, and greater than, those associated with directly investing in securities or other ordinary investments, including risk related to the market, imperfect correlation with underlying investments or the Fund’s other portfolio holdings, higher price volatility, lack of availability, counterparty risk, liquidity, valuation and legal restrictions.

    Options Contracts. The use of options contracts involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The prices of options are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in the value of the underlying instrument, including the anticipated volatility, which are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political, changes in the actual or implied volatility or the reference asset, the time remaining until the expiration of the option contract and economic events.

    Distribution Risk. As part of the Fund’s investment objective, the Fund seeks to provide current income. There is no assurance that the Fund will make a distribution in any given period. If the Fund does make distributions, the amounts of such distributions will likely vary greatly from one distribution to the next.

    High Portfolio Turnover Risk. The Fund may actively and frequently trade all or a significant portion of the Fund’s holdings. A high portfolio turnover rate increases transaction costs, which may increase the Fund’s expenses.

    Liquidity Risk. Some securities held by the Fund, including options contracts, may be difficult to sell or be illiquid, particularly during times of market turmoil.

    Non-Diversification Risk. Because the Fund is “non-diversified,” it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund.

    New Fund Risk. The Fund is a recently organized management investment company with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors do not have a track record or history on which to base their investment decisions.

    Price Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of call option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will participate in increases in value experienced by the underlying reference asset over the Call Period.

    Inflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the present value of the Fund’s assets and distributions, if any, may decline.

    YieldMax™ ETFs are distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC. Foreside is not affiliated with Tidal Financial Group, or YieldMax™ ETFs.

    © 2025 YieldMax™ ETFs

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Datadog Announces First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    First quarter revenue grew 25% year-over-year to $762 million

    Robust growth of larger customers, with about 3,770 $100k+ ARR customers, up from about 3,340 a year ago

    Announced 2025 DASH user conference, June 10-11, in New York City

    NEW YORK, May 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Datadog, Inc. (NASDAQ:DDOG), the monitoring and security platform for cloud applications, today announced financial results for its first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    “Datadog executed solidly in the first quarter, with 25% year-over-year revenue growth, $272 million in operating cash flow, and $244 million in free cash flow,” said Olivier Pomel, co-founder and CEO of Datadog.

    Pomel added, “We are innovating rapidly across the Datadog platform, to help customers observe, secure, and act to solve mission-critical business problems in their modern, cloud environments.”

    First Quarter 2025 Financial Highlights:

    • Revenue was $762 million, an increase of 25% year-over-year.
    • GAAP operating loss was $(12) million; GAAP operating margin was (2)%.
    • Non-GAAP operating income was $167 million; non-GAAP operating margin was 22%.
    • GAAP net income per diluted share was $0.07; non-GAAP net income per diluted share was $0.46.
    • Operating cash flow was $272 million, with free cash flow of $244 million.
    • Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $4.4 billion as of March 31, 2025.

    First Quarter & Recent Business Highlights:

    • As of March 31, 2025, we had about 3,770 customers with ARR of $100,000 or more, an increase of 13% from about 3,340 as of March 31, 2024.
    • Acquired Eppo, a feature flagging and experimentation platform, which will tightly integrate with Datadog’s existing Product Analytics suite.
    • Released the new report, State of DevSecOps 2025, which found that only a fraction of critical vulnerabilities are truly worth prioritizing.
    • Acquired Metaplane, an end-to-end data observability platform that provides advanced machine learning-powered monitoring and column-level lineage to prevent, detect and resolve data quality issues across a company’s entire data stack.
    • Named a Leader in The Forrester Wave™: AIOps Platforms, Q2 2025. Datadog’s AIOps solutions include Bits AI, Watchdog and Event Management.
    • Highlighted multiple recent product launches at Google Cloud Next, including expanded monitoring capabilities for BigQuery.
    • Announced plans for a new data center to be located in Australia. The data center instance will be Datadog’s first in Australia and adds to existing locations in North America, Asia, and Europe.
    • Opened registration for DASH, Datadog’s eighth annual global conference for CIOs, CISOs, developers, SREs, and security and operations professionals, to build and scale the next generation of applications, infrastructure, security, GenAI and teams. The conference will take place June 10-11, 2025 at North Javits Center in New York City.

    Second Quarter and Full Year 2025 Outlook:

    Based on information as of today, May 6, 2025, Datadog is providing the following guidance:

    • Second Quarter 2025 Outlook:
      • Revenue between $787 million and $791 million.
      • Non-GAAP operating income between $148 million and $152 million.
      • Non-GAAP net income per share between $0.40 and $0.42, assuming approximately 361 million weighted average diluted shares outstanding.
    • Full Year 2025 Outlook:
      • Revenue between $3.215 billion and $3.235 billion.
      • Non-GAAP operating income between $625 million and $645 million.
      • Non-GAAP net income per share between $1.67 and $1.71, assuming approximately 362 million weighted average diluted shares outstanding.

    Datadog has not reconciled its expectations as to non-GAAP operating income, or as to non-GAAP net income per share, to their most directly comparable GAAP measure as a result of uncertainty regarding, and the potential variability of, reconciling items such as stock-based compensation and employer payroll taxes on equity incentive plans. Accordingly, reconciliation is not available without unreasonable effort, although it is important to note that these factors could be material to Datadog’s results computed in accordance with GAAP.

    Conference Call Details:

    • What: Datadog financial results for the first quarter of 2025 and outlook for the second quarter and the full year 2025
    • When: May 6, 2025 at 8:00 A.M. Eastern Time (5:00 A.M. Pacific Time)
    • Dial in: To access the call in the U.S., please register here. Callers are encouraged to dial into the call 10 to 15 minutes prior to the start to prevent any delay in joining.
    • Webcast: https://investors.datadoghq.com (live and replay)
    • Replay: A replay of the call will be archived on the investor relations website

    About Datadog

    Datadog is the observability and security platform for cloud applications. Our SaaS platform integrates and automates infrastructure monitoring, application performance monitoring, log management, user experience monitoring, cloud security and many other capabilities to provide unified, real-time observability and security for our customers’ entire technology stack. Datadog is used by organizations of all sizes and across a wide range of industries to enable digital transformation and cloud migration, drive collaboration among development, operations, security and business teams, accelerate time to market for applications, reduce time to problem resolution, secure applications and infrastructure, understand user behavior, and track key business metrics.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release and the earnings call referencing this press release contain “forward-looking” statements, as that term is defined under the federal securities laws, including but not limited to statements regarding Datadog’s strategy, product and platform capabilities, the growth in and ability to capitalize on long-term market opportunities including the pace and scope of cloud migration and digital transformation, gross margins and operating margins including with respect to third-party cloud infrastructure hosting costs, sales and marketing, research and development expenses, net interest and other income, cash taxes, investments and capital expenditures, and Datadog’s future financial performance, including its outlook for the second quarter and the full year 2025 and related notes and assumptions. These forward-looking statements are based on Datadog’s current assumptions, expectations and beliefs and are subject to substantial risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause Datadog’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement.

    The risks and uncertainties referred to above include, but are not limited to (1) our recent rapid growth may not be indicative of our future growth; (2) our history of operating losses; (3) our limited operating history; (4) our dependence on existing customers purchasing additional subscriptions and products from us and renewing their subscriptions; (5) our ability to attract new customers; (6) our ability to effectively develop and expand our sales and marketing capabilities; (7) risk of a security breach; (8) risk of interruptions or performance problems associated with our products and platform capabilities; (9) our ability to adapt and respond to rapidly changing technology or customer needs; (10) the competitive markets in which we participate; (11) risks associated with successfully managing our growth; and (12) general market, political, economic, and business conditions including concerns about trade policies, tariffs, reduced economic growth and associated decreases in information technology spending. These risks and uncertainties are more fully described in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on February 20, 2025. Additional information will be made available in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2025 and other filings and reports that we may file from time to time with the SEC. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, achievements, or events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will occur. Forward-looking statements represent our beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this press release. We disclaim any obligation to update forward-looking statements.

    About Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    Datadog discloses the following non-GAAP financial measures in this release and the earnings call referencing this press release: non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses (research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative), non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP operating margin, non-GAAP net income (loss), non-GAAP net income (loss) per diluted share, non-GAAP net income (loss) per basic share, free cash flow and free cash flow margin. Datadog uses each of these non-GAAP financial measures internally to understand and compare operating results across accounting periods, for internal budgeting and forecasting purposes, for short- and long-term operating plans, and to evaluate Datadog’s financial performance. Datadog believes they are useful to investors, as a supplement to GAAP measures, in evaluating its operational performance, as further discussed below. Datadog’s non-GAAP financial measures may not provide information that is directly comparable to that provided by other companies in its industry, as other companies in its industry may calculate non-GAAP financial results differently, particularly related to non-recurring and unusual items. In addition, there are limitations in using non-GAAP financial measures because the non-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with GAAP and may be different from non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies and exclude expenses that may have a material impact on Datadog’s reported financial results.

    Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of the historical non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measures has been provided in the financial statement tables included below in this press release.

    Datadog defines non-GAAP gross profit, non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses (research and development, sales and marketing and general and administrative), non-GAAP operating income (loss), non-GAAP operating margin and non-GAAP net income (loss) as the respective GAAP balances, adjusted for, as applicable: (1) stock-based compensation expense; (2) the amortization of acquired intangibles; (3) employer payroll taxes on employee stock transactions; (4) amortization of issuance costs; and (5) an assumed provision for income taxes based on our long-term projected tax rate. Our estimated long-term projected tax rate is subject to change for a variety of reasons, including the rapidly evolving global tax environment, significant changes in Datadog’s geographic earnings mix, or other changes to our strategy or business operations. We will re-evaluate our long-term projected tax rate as appropriate. Datadog defines free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities, minus capital expenditures and minus capitalized software development costs, if any. Investors are encouraged to review the reconciliation of these historical non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

    Management believes these non-GAAP financial measures are useful to investors and others in assessing Datadog’s operating performance due to the following factors:

    Stock-based compensation. Datadog utilizes stock-based compensation to attract and retain employees. It is principally aimed at aligning their interests with those of its stockholders and at long-term retention, rather than to address operational performance for any particular period. As a result, stock-based compensation expenses vary for reasons that are generally unrelated to financial and operational performance in any particular period.

    Amortization of acquired intangibles. Datadog views amortization of acquired intangible assets as items arising from pre-acquisition activities determined at the time of an acquisition. While these intangible assets are evaluated for impairment regularly, amortization of the cost of acquired intangibles is an expense that is not typically affected by operations during any particular period.

    Employer payroll taxes on employee stock transactions. Datadog excludes employer payroll tax expense on equity incentive plans as these expenses are tied to the exercise or vesting of underlying equity awards and the price of Datadog’s common stock at the time of vesting or exercise. As a result, these taxes may vary in any particular period independent of the financial and operating performance of Datadog’s business.

    Amortization of issuance costs. In June 2020 and December 2024, Datadog issued $747.5 million of 0.125% convertible senior notes due 2025 and $1.0 billion of 0% convertible senior notes due 2029, respectively. Debt issuance costs, which reduce the carrying value of the convertible debt instrument, are amortized as interest expense over the term. The expense for the amortization of debt issuance costs is a non-cash item, and we believe the exclusion of this interest expense will provide for a more useful comparison of our operational performance in different periods.

    Additionally, Datadog’s management believes that the non-GAAP financial measure free cash flow is meaningful to investors because it is a measure of liquidity that provides useful information in understanding and evaluating the strength of our liquidity and future ability to generate cash that can be used for strategic opportunities or investing in our business. Free cash flow represents net cash provided by operating activities, reduced by capital expenditures and capitalized software development costs, if any. The reduction of capital expenditures and amounts capitalized for software development facilitates comparisons of Datadog’s liquidity on a period-to-period basis and excludes items that management does not consider to be indicative of our liquidity.

    Operating Metrics

    Datadog’s number of customers with ARR of $100,000 or more is based on the ARR of each customer, as of the last month of the quarter.

    We define the number of customers as the number of accounts with a unique account identifier for which we have an active subscription in the period indicated. Users of our free trials or tier are not included in our customer count. A single organization with multiple divisions, segments or subsidiaries is generally counted as a single customer. However, in some cases where they have separate billing terms, we may count separate divisions, segments or subsidiaries as multiple customers.

    We define ARR as the annualized revenue run-rate of subscription agreements from all customers at a point in time. We calculate ARR by taking the monthly recurring revenue, or MRR, and multiplying it by 12. MRR for each month is calculated by aggregating, for all customers during that month, monthly revenue from committed contractual amounts, additional usage, usage from subscriptions for a committed contractual amount of usage that is delivered as used, and monthly subscriptions. ARR and MRR should be viewed independently of revenue, and do not represent our revenue under GAAP on a monthly or annualized basis, as they are operating metrics that can be impacted by contract start and end dates and renewal rates. ARR and MRR are not intended to be replacements or forecasts of revenue.

     
    Datadog, Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
    (In thousands, except per share data; unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Revenue   $ 761,553     $ 611,253  
    Cost of revenue (1)(2)(3)     157,628       110,098  
    Gross profit     603,925       501,155  
    Operating expenses:        
    Research and development (1)(3)     341,061       269,988  
    Sales and marketing (1)(2)(3)     214,291       173,881  
    General and administrative (1)(3)     60,993       45,290  
    Total operating expenses     616,345       489,159  
    Operating (loss) income     (12,420 )     11,996  
    Other income:        
    Interest expense (4)     (2,963 )     (1,374 )
    Interest income and other income, net     47,179       35,563  
    Other income, net     44,216       34,189  
    Income before provision for income taxes     31,796       46,185  
    Provision for income taxes     7,154       3,554  
    Net income   $ 24,642     $ 42,631  
    Net income per share – basic   $ 0.07     $ 0.13  
    Net income per share – diluted   $ 0.07     $ 0.12  
    Weighted average shares used in calculating net income per share:        
    Basic     343,097       331,806  
    Diluted     363,078       355,979  
    (1) Includes stock-based compensation expense as follows:        
    Cost of revenue   $ 6,651     $ 5,527  
    Research and development     105,735       88,413  
    Sales and marketing     34,125       28,531  
    General and administrative     17,754       12,562  
    Total   $ 164,265     $ 135,033  
    (2) Includes amortization of acquired intangibles as follows:        
    Cost of revenue   $ 894     $ 2,027  
    Sales and marketing     203       205  
    Total   $ 1,097     $ 2,232  
    (3) Includes employer payroll taxes on employee stock transactions as follows:                
    Cost of revenue   $ 186     $ 192  
    Research and development     9,582       10,819  
    Sales and marketing     1,570       2,153  
    General and administrative     2,225       2,057  
    Total   $ 13,563     $ 15,221  
    (4) Includes amortization of issuance costs as follows:        
    Interest expense   $ 1,819     $ 850  
    Total   $ 1,819     $ 850  
    Datadog, Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
    (In thousands; unaudited)
     
        March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
    ASSETS        
    CURRENT ASSETS:        
    Cash and cash equivalents   $ 1,079,854     $ 1,246,983  
    Marketable securities     3,369,820       2,942,076  
    Accounts receivable, net of allowance for credit losses of $17,707 and $16,302 as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively     490,172       598,919  
    Deferred contract costs, current     58,832       56,095  
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets     77,660       67,042  
    Total current assets     5,076,338       4,911,115  
    Property and equipment, net     249,916       226,970  
    Operating lease assets     203,074       172,512  
    Goodwill     361,738       360,381  
    Intangible assets, net     2,626       3,711  
    Deferred contract costs, non-current     90,501       86,573  
    Other assets     26,188       24,077  
    TOTAL ASSETS   $ 6,010,381     $ 5,785,339  
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
    CURRENT LIABILITIES:        
    Accounts payable   $ 98,442     $ 107,731  
    Accrued expenses and other current liabilities     138,238       127,136  
    Operating lease liabilities, current     34,228       31,970  
    Convertible senior notes, net, current     634,780       634,023  
    Deferred revenue, current     949,135       961,853  
    Total current liabilities     1,854,823       1,862,713  
    Operating lease liabilities, non-current     227,974       196,905  
    Convertible senior notes, net, non-current     980,314       979,282  
    Deferred revenue, non-current     21,560       22,693  
    Other liabilities     9,036       9,383  
    Total liabilities     3,093,707       3,070,976  
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:        
    Common stock     3       3  
    Additional paid-in capital     2,860,643       2,689,013  
    Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)     1,338       (4,701 )
    Retained earnings     54,690       30,048  
    Total stockholders’ equity     2,916,674       2,714,363  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 6,010,381     $ 5,785,339  
    Datadog, Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
    (In thousands; unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:        
    Net income   $ 24,642     $ 42,631  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
    Depreciation and amortization     11,255       12,895  
    Accretion of discounts on marketable securities     (10,370 )     (14,126 )
    Amortization of issuance costs     1,819       850  
    Amortization of deferred contract costs     14,853       11,844  
    Stock-based compensation, net of amounts capitalized     164,265       135,033  
    Non-cash lease expense     8,389       6,810  
    Allowance for credit losses on accounts receivable     4,520       2,732  
    (Gain) loss on disposal of property and equipment     (145 )     43  
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
    Accounts receivable, net     104,227       55,490  
    Deferred contract costs     (21,519 )     (12,636 )
    Prepaid expenses and other current assets     (10,263 )     (14,075 )
    Other assets     (1,217 )     2,614  
    Accounts payable     (10,712 )     (17,122 )
    Accrued expenses and other liabilities     5,648       (7,433 )
    Deferred revenue     (13,851 )     6,720  
    Net cash provided by operating activities     271,541       212,270  
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:        
    Purchases of marketable securities     (970,302 )     (637,351 )
    Maturities of marketable securities     555,938       401,666  
    Proceeds from sale of marketable securities     (76 )      
    Purchases of property and equipment     (8,748 )     (14,158 )
    Capitalized software development costs     (18,402 )     (11,365 )
    Cash paid for acquisition of businesses; net of cash acquired     (1,818 )      
    Net cash used in investing activities     (443,408 )     (261,208 )
    CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
    Proceeds from exercise of stock options     1,673       2,191  
    Repayments of 2025 Convertible Senior Notes     (20 )      
    Net cash provided by financing activities     1,653       2,191  
             
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents     3,085       (1,374 )
             
    NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS     (167,129 )     (48,121 )
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period     1,246,983       330,339  
    CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period   $ 1,079,854     $ 282,218  
    Datadog, Inc.
    Reconciliation from GAAP to Non-GAAP Results
    (In thousands, except per share data; unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Reconciliation of gross profit and gross margin        
    GAAP gross profit   $ 603,925     $ 501,155  
    Plus: Stock-based compensation expense     6,651       5,527  
    Plus: Amortization of acquired intangibles     894       2,027  
    Plus: Employer payroll taxes on employee stock transactions     186       192  
    Non-GAAP gross profit   $ 611,656     $ 508,901  
    GAAP gross margin     79 %     82 %
    Non-GAAP gross margin     80 %     83 %
             
    Reconciliation of operating expenses        
    GAAP research and development   $ 341,061     $ 269,988  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense     (105,735 )     (88,413 )
    Less: Employer payroll taxes on employee stock transactions     (9,582 )     (10,819 )
    Non-GAAP research and development   $ 225,744     $ 170,756  
             
    GAAP sales and marketing   $ 214,291     $ 173,881  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense     (34,125 )     (28,531 )
    Less: Amortization of acquired intangibles     (203 )     (205 )
    Less: Employer payroll taxes on employee stock transactions     (1,570 )     (2,153 )
    Non-GAAP sales and marketing   $ 178,393     $ 142,992  
             
    GAAP general and administrative   $ 60,993     $ 45,290  
    Less: Stock-based compensation expense     (17,754 )     (12,562 )
    Less: Employer payroll taxes on employee stock transactions     (2,225 )     (2,057 )
    Non-GAAP general and administrative   $ 41,014     $ 30,671  
             
    Reconciliation of operating (loss) income and operating margin        
    GAAP operating (loss) income   $ (12,420 )   $ 11,996  
    Plus: Stock-based compensation expense     164,265       135,033  
    Plus: Amortization of acquired intangibles     1,097       2,232  
    Plus: Employer payroll taxes on employee stock transactions     13,563       15,221  
    Non-GAAP operating income   $ 166,505     $ 164,482  
    GAAP operating margin     (2 )%     2 %
    Non-GAAP operating margin     22 %     27 %
    Datadog, Inc.
    Reconciliation from GAAP to Non-GAAP Results
    (In thousands, except per share data; unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Reconciliation of net income (loss)        
    GAAP net income (loss)   $ 24,642     $ 42,631  
    Plus: Stock-based compensation expense     164,265       135,033  
    Plus: Amortization of acquired intangibles     1,097       2,232  
    Plus: Employer payroll taxes on employee stock transactions     13,563       15,221  
    Plus: Amortization of issuance costs     1,819       850  
    Non-GAAP net income before non-GAAP tax adjustments   $ 205,386     $ 195,967  
    Income tax effects and adjustments (1)     37,479       38,345  
    Non-GAAP net income after non-GAAP tax adjustments   $ 167,907     $ 157,622  
    Net income per share before non-GAAP tax adjustments – basic   $ 0.60     $ 0.59  
    Net income per share before non-GAAP tax adjustments – diluted   $ 0.57     $ 0.55  
             
    Net income per share after non-GAAP tax adjustments – basic   $ 0.49     $ 0.48  
    Net income per share after non-GAAP tax adjustments – diluted   $ 0.46     $ 0.44  
             
    Shares used in non-GAAP net income per share calculations:        
    Basic     343,097       331,806  
    Diluted     363,078       355,979  
    ___________________
    1) Non-GAAP financial information for the periods shown are adjusted for an assumed provision for income taxes based on our long-term projected tax rate of 21%. Due to the differences in the tax treatment of items excluded from non-GAAP earnings, our estimated tax rate on non-GAAP income may differ from our GAAP tax rate and from our actual tax liabilities.
    Datadog, Inc.
    Reconciliation of GAAP Cash Flow from Operating Activities to Free Cash Flow
    (In thousands; unaudited)
     
        Three Months Ended
    March 31,
          2025       2024  
    Net cash provided by operating activities   $ 271,541     $ 212,270  
    Less: Purchases of property and equipment     (8,748 )     (14,158 )
    Less: Capitalized software development costs     (18,402 )     (11,365 )
    Free cash flow   $ 244,391     $ 186,747  
    Free cash flow margin     32 %     31 %

    Contact Information
    Yuka Broderick
    Datadog Investor Relations
    IR@datadoghq.com

    Dan Haggerty
    Datadog Public Relations
    Press@datadoghq.com

    Datadog is a registered trademark of Datadog, Inc.
    All product and company names herein may be trademarks of their registered owners.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Lantronix to Participate in the 22nd Annual Craig-Hallum Institutional Investor Conference on May 28, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    IRVINE, Calif., May 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Lantronix Inc. (NASDAQ: LTRX), a global leader of compute and connectivity for IoT solutions enabling Edge AI Intelligence, today announced that Lantronix CEO Saleel Awsare and CFO Brent Stringham will participate in one-on-one meetings with investors at the 22nd Annual Craig-Hallum Institutional Investor Conference to be held on May 28, 2025, at the Depot Renaissance Hotel in Minneapolis.

    Interested investors should contact Lantronix CFO Brent Stringham at investors@lantronix.com to inquire about availability for a one-on-one meeting.

    About Lantronix

    Lantronix Inc. is a global leader of compute and connectivity IoT solutions that target high-growth markets, including Smart Cities, Enterprise and Transportation. Lantronix’s products and services empower companies to succeed in the growing IoT markets by delivering customizable solutions that enable AI Edge Intelligence. Lantronix’s advanced solutions include Intelligent Substations infrastructure, Infotainment systems and Video Surveillance, supplemented with advanced Out-of-Band Management (OOB) for Cloud and Edge Computing.

    For more information, visit the Lantronix website.

    “Safe Harbor” Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws, including, without limitation, statements related to Lantronix products or leadership team. These forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results, future business, financial condition, or performance to differ materially from our historical results or those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement contained in this news release. The potential risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, such factors as the effects of negative or worsening regional and worldwide economic conditions or market instability on our business, including effects on purchasing decisions by our customers; our ability to mitigate any disruption in our and our suppliers’ and vendors’ supply chains due to the COVID-19 pandemic or other outbreaks, wars and recent tensions in Europe, Asia and the Middle East, or other factors; future responses to and effects of public health crises; cybersecurity risks; changes in applicable U.S. and foreign government laws, regulations, and tariffs; our ability to successfully implement our acquisitions strategy or integrate acquired companies; difficulties and costs of protecting patents and other proprietary rights; the level of our indebtedness, our ability to service our indebtedness and the restrictions in our debt agreements; and any additional factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2024, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on Sept. 9, 2024, including in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of that report, as well as in our other public filings with the SEC. Additional risk factors may be identified from time to time in our future filings. In addition, actual results may differ as a result of additional risks and uncertainties about which we are currently unaware or which we do not currently view as material to our business. For these reasons, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements we make speak only as of the date on which they are made. We expressly disclaim any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date hereof to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our opinions or expectations, except as required by applicable law or the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC. If we do update or correct any forward-looking statements, investors should not conclude that we will make additional updates or corrections.

    Lantronix Media Contact:        
    Gail Kathryn Miller
    Corporate Marketing &
    Communications Manager
    media@lantronix.com

    Lantronix Analyst and Investor Contact:        
    investors@lantronix.com

    ©2025 Lantronix, Inc. All rights reserved. Lantronix is a registered trademark. Other trademarks and trade names are those of their respective owners.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: ARRAY Technologies, Inc. Reports Financial Results for the First Quarter 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    2025 First Quarter Highlights

    • Revenue of $302.4 million
    • Gross Margin of 25.3%
    • Adjusted gross margin(1) of 26.5%
    • Net income to common shareholders of $2.3 million
    • Adjusted EBITDA(1) of $40.6 million
    • Net income per basic and diluted share of $0.02
    • Adjusted net income per diluted share(1) of $0.13
    • Total executed contracts and awarded orders at March 31, 2025 were $2.0 billion
    • Successfully amended and extended our Revolving Credit Facility(2)

    ALBUQUERQUE, N.M., May 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — ARRAY Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ARRY) (“ARRAY” or the “Company”), a leading global provider of solar tracking technology products, systems and services, today announced financial results for its first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    “ARRAY is off to a great start for 2025 with first quarter high double digits revenue growth compared with the first quarter of 2024, and achieving the second largest quarter of volume shipped since 2023, indicating solid market share recovery and the strength of our execution capabilities. We are now able to provide customers with quotes for our 100% domestic content trackers under Table I of the Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”), an important milestone for ARRAY, reflecting our continued commitment to supply chain resilience and ability to minimize effects of geopolitical uncertainty, including tariffs. With electricity demand increasing and utility-scale solar being the lowest cost and fastest-growing energy source, domestic customers are expressing greater interest in Volume Commitment Agreements, and we are well positioned to help our customers deploy projects quickly and efficiently. We have a strong orderbook with 18% sequential growth in contracting for the quarter, gaining meaningful traction with Independent Power Producers across Europe, the Middle East and Asia, where we are seeing strong contracting momentum,” said Chief Executive Officer, Kevin G. Hostetler.

    Mr. Hostetler continued, “Amidst global economic uncertainty related to tariffs, and potential changes to the IRA, we are confident in our ability to navigate changes in the utility-scale solar landscape. As we look forward to building on a strong first quarter, we have flexibility with the strength of our available liquidity, no near-term refinancing requirements, robust operational capabilities and an agile team. We maintain our full year 2025 guidance and remain focused on long-term value creation, deepening customer partnerships, and demonstrating consistent product leadership.”

    Full Year 2025 Guidance

    For the year ending December 31, 2025, the Company maintains guidance:

    • Revenue to be in the range of $1.05 billion to $1.15 billion
    • Adjusted EBITDA(3)(4) to be in the range of $180 million to $200 million
    • Adjusted net income per share(3)(4) to be in the range of $0.60 to $0.70

    (1) A reconciliation of the most comparable GAAP measure to its Non-GAAP measure is included below.

    (2) Matures October 2028 or July 2027 if Term Loan under the Credit Agreement remains outstanding as of July 2027.

    (3) Guidance includes benefits related to the Inflation Reduction Act Section 45X Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit for torque tube and structural fastener manufacturing.

    (4) A reconciliation of projected Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income per share, which are forward-looking measures that are not prepared in accordance with GAAP, to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures, is not provided because we are unable to provide such reconciliation without unreasonable effort. The inability to provide a quantitative reconciliation is due to the uncertainty and inherent difficulty predicting the occurrence, the financial impact and the periods in which the components of the applicable GAAP measures and non-GAAP adjustments may be recognized. The GAAP measures may include the impact of such items as non-cash share-based compensation, revaluation of the fair-value of our contingent consideration, and the tax effect of such items, in addition to other items we have historically excluded from Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income per share. We expect to continue to exclude these items in future disclosures of these non-GAAP measures and may also exclude other similar items that may arise in the future (collectively, “non-GAAP adjustments”). The decisions and events that typically lead to the recognition of non-GAAP adjustments are inherently unpredictable as to if or when they may occur. As such, for our 2025 guidance, we have not included estimates for these items and are unable to address the probable significance of the unavailable information, which could be material to future results.

    Supplemental Presentation and Conference Call Information

    ARRAY has posted a supplemental presentation to its website, which will be discussed during the conference call hosted by management today (May 6, 2025) at 8:00 a.m. (ET). The conference call can be accessed live over the phone by dialing (877)869-3847 (domestic) or (201)689-8261 (international) and entering the passcode 13752974, or via webcast of the live conference call by logging onto the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at http://ir.arraytechinc.com. A telephonic replay will be available approximately three hours after the call by dialing (877)660-6853 (domestic), or (201)612-7415 (international), with the passcode 13752974. The replay will be available until 11:59 p.m. (ET) on May 20, 2025. The online replay will be available for 30 days on the same website, immediately following the call.

    About ARRAY Technologies, Inc.

    ARRAY Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: ARRY) is a leading global provider of solar tracking technology to utility-scale and distributed generation customers, who construct, develop, and operate solar PV sites. With solutions engineered to withstand the harshest weather conditions, ARRAY’s high-quality solar trackers, software platforms and field services combine to maximize energy production and deliver value to our customers for the entire lifecycle of a project. Founded and headquartered in the United States, ARRAY is rooted in manufacturing and driven by technology – relying on its domestic manufacturing, diversified global supply chain, and customer-centric approach to design, deliver, commission, train, and support solar energy deployment around the world. For more news and information on ARRAY, please visit arraytechinc.com.

    Investor Relations Contact:

    H. Keith Jennings
    505-437-0010
    investors@arraytechinc.com

    Media Contact:

    Nicole Stewart
    505-589-8257

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing and investment plans, competitive position, industry and regulatory environment, including potential regulatory reform related to energy credits, uncertainty relating the implementation of tariffs and changes in trade policy, ability to provide 100% domestic content trackers, expectations regarding the macroeconomic environment and geopolitical developments, including the effects of tariffs, potential growth opportunities and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements include statements that are not historical facts and can be identified by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “project,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “designed to” or similar expressions and the negatives of those terms.

    Array’s actual results and the timing of events could materially differ from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks, uncertainties and other factors, including without limitation: changes in the cost and availability of raw materials as a result of tariffs and other geopolitical uncertainty, changes in growth or rate of growth in demand for solar energy projects; competitive pressures within our industry; factors affecting viability and demand for solar energy, including but not limited to, the retail price of electricity, availability of in-demand components like high voltage breakers, various policies related to the permitting and interconnection costs of solar plants, and the availability of incentives for solar energy and solar energy production systems, which makes it difficult to predict our future prospects; competition from conventional and renewable energy sources; a loss of one or more of our significant customers, their inability to perform under their contracts, or their default in payment; a drop in the price of electricity derived from the utility grid or from alternative energy sources; fluctuations in our results of operations across fiscal periods, which could make our future performance difficult to predict and could cause our results of operations for a particular period to fall below expectations; any increase in interest rates, or a reduction in the availability of tax equity or project debt capital in the global financial markets, which could make it difficult for customers to finance the cost of a solar energy system; existing electric utility industry policies and regulations, and any subsequent changes or new related policies and regulations, may present technical, regulatory and economic barriers to the purchase and use of solar energy systems, which may significantly reduce demand for our products or harm our ability to compete; the interruption of the flow of materials from international vendors, which could disrupt our supply chain, including as a result of the imposition of new and/or additional duties, tariffs and other charges or restrictions on imports and exports; changes in the global trade environment, including the imposition of import tariffs or other import restrictions; geopolitical, macroeconomic and other market conditions unrelated to our operating performance including but not limited interest rates; our ability to convert our orders in backlog into revenue; the reduction, elimination or expiration, or our failure to optimize the benefits of government incentives for, or regulations mandating the use of, renewable energy and solar energy, particularly in relation to our competitors; failure to, or incurrence of significant costs in order to, obtain, maintain, protect, defend or enforce, our intellectual property and other proprietary right; delays in construction projects and any failure to manage our inventory; significant changes in the cost of raw materials; disruptions to transportation and logistics, including increases in shipping costs; defects or performance problems in our products, which could result in loss of customers, reputational damage and decreased revenue; delays, disruptions or quality control problems in our product development operations; our ability to retain our key personnel or failure to attract additional qualified personnel; additional business, financial, regulatory and competitive risks due to our continued planned expansion into new markets; cybersecurity or other data incidents, including unauthorized disclosure of personal or sensitive data or theft of confidential information; a failure to maintain an effective system of integrated internal controls over financial reporting; our substantial indebtedness, risks related to actual or threatened public health epidemics, pandemics, outbreaks or crises; changes to laws and regulations, including changes to tax laws and regulations, that are applied adversely to us or our customers, including our ability to optimize those changes brought about by the passage of the IRA or any repeal thereof; and the other risks and uncertainties described in more detail in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents on file with the SEC, each of which can be found on our website, www.arraytechinc.com.

    Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Also, forward-looking statements represent our management’s beliefs and assumptions only as of the date of this report. You should read this press release with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.

    Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements, or to update the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.

    Non-GAAP Financial Information

    This press release includes certain financial measures that are not presented in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), including Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted net income, Adjusted net income per share, Adjusted general and administrative expense and Free cash flow.

    We define Adjusted gross profit as gross profit plus (i) amortization of developed technology and (ii) other costs if applicable. We define Adjusted gross margin as Adjusted gross profit as a percentage of revenue. We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) to common shareholders plus (i) other expense, net, (ii) foreign currency (gain) loss, net, (iii) preferred dividends and accretion, (iv) interest expense, (v) income tax expense (benefit), (vi) depreciation expense, (vii) amortization of intangibles, (viii) amortization of developed technology, (ix) equity-based compensation, (x) change in fair value of contingent consideration, (xi) certain legal expenses, and (xii) other costs. We define Adjusted net income as net income (loss) to common shareholders plus (i) amortization of intangibles, (ii) amortization of developed technology, (iii) amortization of debt discount and issuance costs (iv) Series A preferred stock accretion, (v) equity-based compensation, (vi) change in fair value of contingent consideration, (vii) certain legal expenses, (viii) other costs, and (ix) income tax (benefit) expense adjustments. We define Adjusted general and administrative expense as general and administrative expense less (i) equity based compensation, (ii) certain legal expenses, and (iii) other costs. We define Free cash flow as Cash provided by (used in) operating activities less purchase of property, plant and equipment.

    A detailed reconciliation between GAAP results and results excluding special items (“non-GAAP”) is included within this press release. We calculate net income (loss) per share as net income (loss) to common shareholders divided by the basic and diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding for the applicable period and we define Adjusted net income per share as Adjusted net income (as detailed above) divided by the basic and diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding for the applicable period.

    We believe that these non-GAAP financial measures are provided to enhance the reader’s understanding of our past financial performance and our prospects for the future. Our management team uses these non-GAAP financial measures in assessing the Company’s performance, as well as in planning and forecasting future periods. The non-GAAP financial information is presented for supplemental informational purposes only and should not be considered a substitute for financial information presented in accordance with GAAP and may be different from similarly titled non-GAAP measures used by other companies.

    Among other limitations, Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; do not reflect the impact of certain cash charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our ongoing operations; do not reflect income tax expense or benefit; and other companies in our industry may calculate Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income differently than we do, which limits their usefulness as comparative measures. Because of these limitations, Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for performance measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.

    We compensate for these limitations by relying primarily on our GAAP results and using Adjusted gross profit, Adjusted gross margin, Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income on a supplemental basis.

    You should review the reconciliation of gross profit to Adjusted gross profit and net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted net income below and not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business.

    Array Technologies, Inc. 
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
    (in thousands, except per share and share amounts)
     
      March 31,
    2025
      December 31,
    2024
    ASSETS
    Current assets      
    Cash and cash equivalents $ 348,324     $ 362,992  
    Restricted cash   1,169       1,149  
    Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $6,601 and $4,848, respectively   282,575       275,838  
    Inventories, net   186,875       200,818  
    Prepaid expenses and other   157,348       157,927  
    Total current assets   976,291       998,724  
           
    Property, plant and equipment, net   28,740       26,222  
    Goodwill   164,221       160,189  
    Other intangible assets, net   176,347       181,409  
    Deferred income tax assets   16,049       17,754  
    Other assets   64,110       41,701  
    Total assets $ 1,425,758     $ 1,425,999  
           
    LIABILITIES, REDEEMABLE PERPETUAL PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
    Current liabilities      
    Accounts payable $ 153,781     $ 172,368  
    Accrued expenses and other   77,576       91,183  
    Accrued warranty reserve   2,045       2,063  
    Income tax payable   8,734       5,227  
    Deferred revenue   120,225       119,775  
    Current portion of contingent consideration   2,528       1,193  
    Current portion of debt   34,472       30,714  
    Other current liabilities   9,132       15,291  
    Total current liabilities   408,493       437,814  
           
    Deferred income tax liabilities   21,634       21,398  
    Contingent consideration, net of current portion   5,179       7,868  
    Other long-term liabilities   17,311       18,684  
    Long-term warranty   5,021       4,830  
    Long-term debt, net of current portion   644,520       646,570  
    Total liabilities   1,102,158       1,137,164  
           
    Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)      
           
    Series A Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock of $0.001 par value; 500,000 authorized; 468,122 and 460,920 shares issued as of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively; liquidation preference of $493.1 million at both dates   421,374       406,931  
           
    Stockholders’ equity      
    Preferred stock of $0.001 par value – 4,500,000 shares authorized; none issued at respective dates          
    Common stock of $0.001 par value – 1,000,000,000 shares authorized; 152,512,805 and 151,951,652 shares issued at respective dates   151       151  
    Additional paid-in capital   286,079       297,780  
    Accumulated deficit   (353,878 )     (370,624 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive income   (30,126 )     (45,403 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   (97,774 )     (118,096 )
    Total liabilities, redeemable perpetual preferred stock and stockholders’ equity $ 1,425,758     $ 1,425,999  
    Array Technologies, Inc.
    Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)
    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
     
      Three Months Ended March 31,
        2025       2024  
    Revenue $ 302,363     $ 153,403  
    Cost of revenue      
    Cost of product and service revenue   222,296       94,674  
    Amortization of developed technology   3,639       3,639  
    Total cost of revenue   225,935       98,313  
    Gross profit   76,428       55,090  
           
    Operating expenses      
    General and administrative   43,945       37,784  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration   (150 )     (735 )
    Depreciation and amortization   5,349       9,627  
    Total operating expenses   49,144       46,676  
           
    Income from operations   27,284       8,414  
           
    Other expense, net   23       814  
    Interest income   3,319       3,680  
    Foreign currency gain (loss), net   689       (499 )
    Interest expense   (8,035 )     (8,940 )
    Total other expense, net   (4,004 )     (4,945 )
           
    Income before income tax expense   23,280       3,469  
    Income tax expense   6,534       1,304  
    Net income   16,746       2,165  
    Preferred dividends and accretion   14,443       13,502  
    Net income (loss) to common shareholders $ 2,303     $ (11,337 )
           
    Income (loss) per common share      
    Basic $ 0.02     $ (0.07 )
    Diluted $ 0.02     $ (0.07 )
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding      
    Basic   152,076       151,351  
    Diluted   152,783       151,351  
    Array Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)
    (in thousands)
     
      Three Months Ended March 31,
        2025       2024  
    Operating activities      
    Net income $ 16,746     $ 2,165  
    Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:      
    Provision for bad debts   1,671       896  
    Deferred tax expense (benefit)   1,024       (13 )
    Depreciation and amortization   5,932       10,125  
    Amortization of developed technology   3,639       3,639  
    Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs   1,506       1,553  
    Equity-based compensation   2,798       3,926  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration   (150 )     (735 )
    Warranty provision   1,720       (1,138 )
    Inventory reserve   839       600  
    Changes in working capital, net   (48,784 )     26,484  
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities   (13,059 )     47,502  
    Investing activities      
    Purchase of property, plant and equipment   (2,352 )     (2,396 )
    Retirement/disposal of property, plant and equipment         10  
    Net cash used in investing activities   (2,352 )     (2,386 )
    Financing activities      
    Proceeds from issuance of other debt   7,862       2,283  
    Principal payments on other debt   (7,294 )     (3,781 )
    Principal payments on term loan facility   (1,075 )     (1,070 )
    Contingent consideration payments   (1,204 )     (1,427 )
    Other financing   (14 )     (580 )
    Net cash used in financing activities   (1,725 )     (4,575 )
    Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalent balances   2,488       (2,001 )
    Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash   (14,648 )     38,540  
    Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash beginning of period   364,141       249,080  
    Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period $ 349,493     $ 287,620  
    Array Technologies, Inc.
    Adjusted Gross Profit, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income, General and Administrative Expense and Free Cash Flow Reconciliation (unaudited)
    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
    The following table reconciles Gross profit to Adjusted gross profit:
      Three Months Ended March 31,
      2025   2024
    Revenue 302,363     153,403  
    Cost of revenue 225,935     98,313  
    Gross profit 76,428     55,090  
    Gross margin 25.3 %   35.9 %
           
    Amortization of developed technology 3,639     3,639  
    Adjusted gross profit 80,067     58,729  
    Adjusted gross margin 26.5 %   38.3 %

    The following table reconciles net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA:

      Three Months Ended March 31,
        2025       2024  
    Net income $ 16,746     $ 2,165  
    Preferred dividends and accretion   14,443       13,502  
    Net income (loss) to common shareholders $ 2,303     $ (11,337 )
    Other expense, net   (3,342 )     (4,494 )
    Foreign currency gain (loss), net   (689 )     499  
    Preferred dividends and accretion   14,443       13,502  
    Interest expense   8,035       8,940  
    Income tax expense (benefit)   6,534       1,304  
    Depreciation expense   1,043       883  
    Amortization of intangibles   4,889       9,254  
    Amortization of developed technology   3,639       3,639  
    Equity-based compensation   2,798       4,020  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration   (150 )     (735 )
    Certain legal expenses(a)   1,083       730  
    Other costs(b)         42  
    Adjusted EBITDA $ 40,586     $ 26,247  


    (a)
    Represents certain legal fees and other related costs associated with (i) actions filed against the company and certain officers and directors alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which litigation was dismissed with prejudice by the Court on May 19, 2023 and subsequently appealed. The appeal has been fully briefed, argued, and the Company is awaiting a decision, and (ii) legal and success fees related to a regional tax dispute for a period prior to the acquisition of STI, and (iii) other litigation and legal matters. We consider these costs not representative of legal costs that we will incur from time to time in the ordinary course of our business.

    (b) For the three months ended March 31, 2024, other costs represent costs related to Capped-Call treatment evaluation for prior year.

    Array Technologies, Inc.
    Adjusted Gross Profit, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income, General and Administrative Expense and Free Cash Flow Reconciliation (unaudited)
    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
    The following table reconciles net income (loss) to Adjusted net income:
      Three Months Ended March 31,
        2025       2024  
    Net income $ 16,746     $ 2,165  
    Preferred dividends and accretion   14,443       13,502  
    Net income (loss) to common shareholders $ 2,303     $ (11,337 )
    Amortization of Intangibles   4,889       9,254  
    Amortization of developed technology   3,639       3,639  
    Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs   1,393       1,552  
    Series A Pref stock accretion   7,241       6,665  
    Equity based compensation   2,798       4,020  
    Change in fair value of contingent consideration   (150 )     (735 )
    Certain legal expenses (a)   1,083       730  
    Other costs(b)         42  
    Income tax expense of adjustments(c)   (3,474 )     (4,852 )
    Adjusted net income $ 19,722     $ 8,978  
           
    Income (loss) per common share      
    Basic $ 0.02     $ (0.07 )
    Diluted $ 0.02     $ (0.07 )
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding      
    Basic   152,076       151,351  
    Diluted   152,783       151,351  
           
    Adjusted net income per common share      
    Basic $ 0.13     $ 0.06  
    Diluted $ 0.13     $ 0.06  
    Weighted average number of common shares outstanding      
    Basic   152,076       151,351  
    Diluted   152,783       152,243  


    (a)
    Represents certain legal fees and other related costs associated with (i) actions filed against the company and certain officers and directors alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which litigation was dismissed with prejudice by the Court on May 19, 2023 and subsequently appealed. The appeal has been fully briefed, argued, and the Company is awaiting a decision, and (ii) legal and success fees related to a regional tax dispute for a period prior to the acquisition of STI, and (iii) other litigation and legal matters. We consider these costs not representative of legal costs that we will incur from time to time in the ordinary course of our business.

    (b) For the three months ended March 31, 2024, other costs represent costs related to Capped-Call treatment evaluation for prior year.

    (c) Represents the estimated tax impact of all Adjusted Net Income add-backs, excluding those which represent permanent differences between book versus tax.

    Array Technologies, Inc.
    Adjusted Gross Profit, Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted Net Income, General and Administrative Expense and Free Cash Flow Reconciliation (unaudited)
    (in thousands, except per share amounts)
    The following table reconciles General and administrative expense to Adjusted general and administrative expense:
      Three Months Ended March 31,
      2025   2024
    General and administrative expense 43,945     37,784  
    Equity based compensation (2,798 )   (4,020 )
    Certain legal expenses(a) (1,083 )   (730 )
    Other costs(b)     (42 )
    Adjusted general and administrative expense 40,064     32,992  


    (a)
    Represents certain legal fees and other related costs associated with (i) actions filed against the company and certain officers and directors alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which litigation was dismissed with prejudice by the Court on May 19, 2023 and subsequently appealed. The appeal has been fully briefed, argued, and the Company is awaiting a decision, and (ii) legal and success fees related to a regional tax dispute for a period prior to the acquisition of STI, and (iii) other litigation and legal matters. We consider these costs not representative of legal costs that we will incur from time to time in the ordinary course of our business.

    (b) For the three months ended March 31, 2024, other costs represent costs related to Capped-Call treatment evaluation for prior year.

    The following table reconciles cash provided by (used in) operating activities to Free cash flow:

      Three Months Ended March 31,
      2025   2024
    Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (13,059 )   47,502  
    Purchase of property, plant and equipment (2,352 )   (2,396 )
    Free cash flow (15,411 )   45,106  

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Giants warning of dangers of military land to remain permanently

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    Giants warning of dangers of military land to remain permanently

    An installation to warn of the dangers of accessing military land has been granted permanent planning permission to remain.

    Local children running alongside the Respect the Range installation. Richard Dawson PA Media Assignments.

    A striking art display warning of the dangers of accessing military land has been granted permanent planning permission to remain on the edge of Salisbury Plain Training Area in Westbury. 

    The display, consisting of 29 silhouettes, including three 10ft ‘giants’ modelled on local soldiers, was originally installed by charity Standing with Giants in the summer of 2024.  

    Initially planned as a temporary art piece, the installation promoting the MOD’s Respect the Range safety campaign, has proved to be incredibly popular. Images of the giants have regularly appeared across social media as the public visit what is fast becoming a valued landmark in the area.  

    The MOD has been working closely with Westbury Town Council to secure permanent planning permission for the installation. The display will be gifted to the council so the giants can continue standing proudly to share the Respect the Range campaign’s important safety messages to locals and visitors for years to come.  

    Lt Col Andy Hough, Regional Commander of the Defence Training Estate in the South West, said:  

    We’re delighted that the giants are to stay at Westbury. It’s been a great collaborative effort with Westbury Town Council to secure this result and we’d also like to thank our industry partner Landmarc Solutions for their ongoing support with the project.  

    The giants carry with them important safety messaging that we hope people will take on board when in and around the military training estate at Salisbury Plain.  

    Military training can take place at any time of day and night across the year and, with heightened tensions across the globe, it’s important our armed forces can train uninterrupted and that we work with the public to keep each other safe.

    Deborah Urch, Westbury Town Council Town Clerk said: 

    There was real excitement when the giants were unveiled last year and it’s fantastic to know they’ll be staying. They have really added something special to the area and local residents I’ve spoken to feel a real sense of pride in them.  

    We have a strong relationship with our military, and we’re delighted that we’re able to support them by continuing to promote this key public safety message.

    Dan Barton, CEO Standing with Giants said:  

    It’s always humbling when your artwork is so keenly adopted by local residents and talked about with such enthusiasm. Our ethos has always been about respecting what our military have and continue to sacrifice for our freedoms and we’re delighted that this piece of art will be staying in Westbury, adjacent to such an iconic military training area.

    Two thirds of the MOD’s land is used for military training, which is vital to ensure the UK’s Armed Forces are ready to deploy on operations. 

    Across the UK each year, thousands of incidents are recorded of the public accessing MOD land when and where they shouldn’t, posing a serious safety risk and often impacting on the training taking place.  

    Respect the Range: The Salisbury Plain Giants – YouTube

    The public are reminded that they should only access military training areas when and where it is safe to do so and should exercise caution at all times. To help keep themselves and their loved ones safe, the MOD is asking the public to follow these simple steps: 

    • Look out for red flags and observe all signs and information 

    • Check live firing online at Gov.uk before visiting a military training area 

    • Stick to footpaths, bridleways, byways and Public Rights of Way  

    • Keep dogs under close control and pick up after them.  

    • Never touch any military debris (UXO), report it for safe removal 

    For further information visit: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/safe-access 

    Updates to this page

    Published 6 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Udemy

    Source: UNISDR Disaster Risk Reduction

    Mission

    Udemy’s mission is to provide flexible, effective skill development to empower organizations and individuals. Udemy is a learning platform that helps learners prepare for the path ahead — wherever it leads. Its curated collection of business and technical courses help companies, governments, and nonprofits go further by placing learning at the center of their strategies.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Valentin-Yves Mudimbe: the philosopher who reshaped how the world thinks about Africa

    Source: The Conversation – Africa – By Christophe Premat, Associate Professor in French Studies (cultural studies), head of the Centre for Canadian Studies, Stockholm University

    Valentin-Yves Mudimbe. Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA

    Congolese thinker, philosopher and linguist Valentin-Yves Mudimbe died on 21 April 2025 at the age of 83. He was in the US, where he had lived for many years.

    A towering figure in African critical thought, Mudimbe’s work – translated and studied worldwide – has profoundly shaped postcolonial studies. He leaves a groundbreaking intellectual legacy on the colonisation of knowledge and the condition of Africans.

    At a time when debates on decolonising knowledge are gaining ground, Mudimbe’s passing invites us to revisit the work of a thinker who, since the 1980s, paved the way for a radical critique of imposed “categories”. He wanted to help rebuild intellectual frameworks which imagined and defined Africa on its own terms, not through the labels or categories imposed by colonial powers.

    As a specialist in postmodern and postcolonial theories, I think he had considerable influence on the field of postcolonial studies.

    He was one of the most influential African thinkers of the 20th century. His impact did not come from activism, but from careful, sustained intellectual work. With his seminal work The Invention of Africa (1988) he profoundly disrupted African and postcolonial studies. His work went far beyond the usual east-west divide.

    A journey between Africa and exile

    Valentin-Yves Mudimbe was born in 1941 in Jadotville (now Likasi), in the Democratic Republic of Congo. His early education took place in a Benedictine monastery. Later, he pursued further studies at Louvain in Belgium.

    His religious education left a lasting mark on his thinking. It shaped his critical approach to knowledge. His work often explored the connections between language, power, and how ideas become institutionalised.

    In 1970, Mudimbe returned to the newly independent Congo. He began teaching at the National University of Zaïre. The country was then caught between postcolonial hope and growing disillusionment.

    Under Mobutu Sese Seko’s regime, the political atmosphere grew stifling for independent thinkers. The state had adopted the rhetoric of “authenticity”, turning it into a tool of control. Faced with this ideological stranglehold, Mudimbe chose exile in 1979.

    He relocated to the US, where he taught at Stanford and later Duke University. There, he continued his work of critical deconstruction. Yet, despite his physical distance, he remained deeply committed to Africa’s future.

    Deconstructing the ‘colonial library’

    First published in English in 1988 as the The Invention of Africa, the book was translated into French in 2021 under the title L’Invention de l’Afrique, (Présence africaine).

    Mudimbe offers much more than a critique of colonial representations. He examined the “colonial library”. It refers to the vast collection of religious, anthropological and administrative texts that, for centuries, framed Africa as an object to be studied, dominated and “saved”. Mudimbe was always careful not to accept ideas just because they were passed down. Instead, he was always looking for new ways to think freely and independently.

    Unlike Edward Said, the Palestinian-American literary theorist and critic who exposed how the west constructed a mythologised “Orient”, Mudimbe revealed something more insidious. He showed that Africa was often imagined as a void to be filled. It was cast as a cultural blank slate, which helped justify the colonial mission.

    This radical deconstruction raised a crucial question: how can we produce knowledge that does not, even through critique, reproduce the very colonial frameworks it seeks to challenge?

    The book’s impact was profound, resonating across Africa, Europe and North America. It created an intellectual foundation for thinkers like Achille Mbembe, Souleymane Bachir Diagne and Felwine Sarr, who, in turn, continued to explore what truly decolonised African thought might look like.

    Building something new

    Mudimbe was never satisfied with existing structures. He aimed to build something new from the ground up. For him, liberating Africa required a rebuilding of knowledge systems. He rejected the assumption that western intellectual frameworks alone could define Africa. He also warned against essentialist temptations – the trap of creating new conceptual prisons in the name of authenticity.

    His thinking followed a rigorous method: analysing discourse, questioning inherited categories, and dismantling false assumptions.

    This demanding work aimed to empower Africa to think for itself without cutting itself off from the rest of the world.

    His fiction – Between Tides (in French, Entre les eaux. Dieu, un prêtre, la révolution), Before the Birth of the Moon (Le Bel Immonde in French), Shaba Deux : les carnets de mère Marie Gertrude – embodies the same refusal to be stereotyped.

    His characters navigate colonial legacies, state nationalism and rigid identity politics through stories of displacement and fragmented memory.

    Language itself becomes a battleground for creativity in his novels. Sharply crafted, his prose captures the diversity of contemporary African experience. Through both his literary and philosophical works, Mudimbe consistently insisted that identity is never a given. It is always a construct to be questioned.

    A living legacy

    As Africa navigates complex geopolitical transformations and redefines its cultural identities, Mudimbe’s intellectual legacy proves more vital than ever. His work challenges us to recognise that true liberation extends beyond political sovereignty or cultural revival. It requires the radical work of reinventing how knowledge itself is produced and validated.

    Mudimbe’s lasting legacy urges us to remain intellectually vigilant in a world where knowledge is constantly shifting. He challenges us to reject rigid categories, embrace complexity with care, and make room for uncertainty instead of rushing to resolve it.

    For Mudimbe, to decolonise knowledge means relentless critique paired with creative reconstruction. It means building pluralistic and open frameworks that honour Africa’s diverse experiences without nostalgia or complacency.

    Christophe Premat is a lecturer and researcher in Francophone cultural studies at the Department of Romance and Classical Studies at Stockholm University. In 2018, he published the book For a Critical Genealogy of the Francophonie, released by Stockholm University Press. He states that he worked at the French Institute of Sweden / French Embassy in Stockholm from 2008 to 2013, dealing, among other things, with issues related to the Francophonie. He is currently a member of CISE (Confédération Internationale Solidaire Écologiste), an association of French citizens abroad founded in 2018 (https://cise-francaisdeletranger.net/). He is the head of the Centre for Canadian Studies at Stockholm University.

    ref. Valentin-Yves Mudimbe: the philosopher who reshaped how the world thinks about Africa – https://theconversation.com/valentin-yves-mudimbe-the-philosopher-who-reshaped-how-the-world-thinks-about-africa-255902

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Boost for woodlands as research to tackle plant pests & diseases

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Boost for woodlands as research to tackle plant pests & diseases

    Key research to combat ongoing pest and disease outbreaks and emerging threats to protect our trees

    British woodlands and trees will benefit from new research aimed at boosting protection against pests and diseases, announced today (Tuesday 6 May).

    Our plants and trees are estimated to contribute £4.1 billion per year to the UK’s economy – their vast canopies are teeming with birds and insects, they help mitigate the impact of flooding for communities across the country, trees outside woodland in towns as well as rural areas are cherished by the British people. But our trees are vulnerable, with plant pests and diseases posing a significant threat to nature and the economy.

    The threat from pests and diseases is growing due to factors like climate change, and it is increasingly important to plant resilient trees that can withstand warmer temperatures so people and nature can enjoy the widespread benefits they bring.

    17 new research projects will improve tree health and resilience through the Centre for Forest Protection – a collaboration between Forest Research and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew – as part of the Government’s Plan for Change.

    These will help plant and protect treescapes that are resilient to stresses including climate change and pests and diseases such as ash dieback, which has been estimated to kill over 100 million trees in the UK and cost the economy up to £15 billion to Great Britain over the coming decades.

    The £4 million of funding will include projects to facilitate future tree breeding for resilience to ash dieback and a fungal disease affecting Scots pine, and new technologies so trees can flower at a younger age to accelerate breeding programmes.

    Professor Nicola Spence, Defra’s Chief Plant Health Officer, said:

    “Tackling the growing threat from plant pests and diseases due to climate change is critical to protect the long-term health and resilience of our trees.

    “Expanding our research efforts and work to restore native ash trees are an important step in the fight against diseases which devastate our nations woodlands, protecting trees for the benefits they bring to our climate and for people’s enjoyment.”

    Dr Louise Gathercole, Centre for Forest Protection Coordinator, said:

    “At Forest Research and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, we are delighted to continue our collaboration under the Centre for Forest Protection.

    “Funding this virtual centre gives us the opportunity to leverage the expertise and resources of both organisations, along with a wide range of other collaborators, to carry out innovative science and produce the evidence needed for future woodland resilience.”

    Projects for 2025/26 include:

    • Dodging the double whammy, looking into whether trees resilient to ash dieback can also help avoid damage from Emerald Ash Borer, an exotic emerald coloured beetle from Asia which has caused significant damage to ash trees in North America.
    • Infusing resilience into the Scots pine genetic resource, breeding pine trees resilience to Dothistroma needle blight, a fungal disease which can reduce timber yields and even cause tree death.
    • Developing novel methods to understand and mitigate grey squirrel bark stripping behaviour, on the impact of invasive grey squirrels on woodlands – with an estimated economic cost of £37 million annually – and how to combat bark stripping behaviour, which disincentivises tree planting and leaves trees susceptible to increased risk of disease.

    As part of £700,000 of Defra-funded research, a second UK ash tree archive in Scotland has now been planted aimed at increasing resilience and further developing efforts for a breeding programme of tolerant UK ash. This is a key step towards restoring native ash back to our landscape. 

    2500 young trees have now been planted over the 1-hectare site. These trees have been specially selected as showing signs of potential resistance to the disease. Over the coming years, the less healthy individuals will be weeded out, allowing for the best trees to form a potential seed orchard for resistant ash seed production in future.

    This follows over 3000 trees of tolerant ash being planted at the first ash archive site in southern England in 2019. Screening for tolerant trees in a different climate away from other threats will significantly boost research efforts. Identifying ash with a high tolerance to the disease will enable the development of orchards producing commercially available seed and prove transformative to our future landscapes.

    The announcement marks the launch of this year’s National Plant Health Week (5-12 May 2025), an annual designated week of action to raise public awareness and engagement on how to keep our plants healthy, led by Defra in partnership with 32 organisations, including the Royal Horticultural Society, the Woodland Trust and the Horticultural Trades Association

    Additional information:

    • The second ash archive is funded by Defra on an estate owned by Forestry Land Scotland in Clackmannanshire.
    • The Centre for Forest Protection is a collaborative, virtual hub which aims to protect our trees from environmental and socioeconomic threats, through innovative science, interdisciplinary research, expert advice and training. The CFP is led by Forest Research – Great Britain’s principal organisation for forestry and tree-related research – and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, whose mission is to understand and protect plants and fungi, for the well-being of people and the future of all life on Earth.

    The 17 new research projects are:

    • Dodging the Double Whammy: Does Resistance to Ash Dieback Help European Ash Avoid Damage by Emerald Ash Borer?
    • Knowledge synthesis: How trees evolve under novel conditions
    • SUPPoRT: Sustainable Plant Provenancing for Resilient Trees
    • Genomic basis of ash health after five and thirteen years’ exposure to ash dieback
    • Complex Yew Decline Research
    • ADGROW: Applied Dendrochronology for the Genomic Resilience Of Woodlands
    • EXPLORATION: Assessing the robustness of mixed species planting as a drought adaptation measure during early stage establishment – an experimental approach
    • Enhancing forest resilience through stand structural complexity
    • Infusing resilience into the Scots pine genetic resource
    • Phenology, Genomics, and Non-Destructive Testing: A Comprehensive Approach to Detecting, Understanding, and Reducing Oak Shake (PhenoGenDT)
    • Speed breeding technologies for UK broadleaved trees
    • Forest Sector Modelling of the Impact of Biotic and Abiotic Risks on Forest Resilience
    • Developing novel methods to understand and mitigate grey squirrel bark stripping behaviour
    • Supporting farmers’ on-farm integration of tree resilience actions
    • REWARD, Remote Early Warning and Advanced Response for Diseases.
    • The wind within the trees: understanding cultural, silvicultural, and timber quality dimensions to windstorm risks and impacts
    • Resilience to compound abiotic and biotic stress in native Scots Pine

    Updates to this page

    Published 6 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: F. Merz did not receive the required majority of votes in the Bundestag in the vote for the post of German Chancellor

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Xinhua | 06. 05. 2025

    Keywords: post of chancellor of germany, majority of votes, merz, bundestag, received, voting, election as chancellor, democratic union, votes, christian, enough, will take place, policy, necessary, collected, candidate

    BERLIN, May 6 (Xinhua) — Friedrich Merz, the Christian Democratic Union’s candidate for German chancellor, fell short of the required majority in the Bundestag election on Tuesday, falling six votes short of the 316 needed to be elected chancellor.

    Numerous German media outlets have suggested that there will be no second round of voting on Tuesday. –0–

    Source: Xinhua

    F. Merz did not receive the required majority of votes in the Bundestag when voting for the post of German Chancellor F. Merz did not receive the required majority of votes in the Bundestag when voting for the post of German Chancellor

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: The HSE team is the champion of the All-Russian student festival in advertising and PR

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: State University Higher School of Economics – State University Higher School of Economics –

    “PR and Advertising Week on Yenisei” – “Yarpiar” – All-Russian student festival on advertising and PR brought the School of Communications of the National Research University Higher School of Economics 22 awards.

    Photo by: Yulia Korogod

    The festival was held from April 21 to 24 and included an advertising Olympiad, the Blue Cone competition, a scientific and practical conference and master classes. This year’s concept was “Eco-communications”, as well as the role of advertising and PR in sustainable development. This year, 27 teams from three countries, 16 cities and 25 universities took part in the Festival.

    The Yes.My team, led by Rimma Pogodina, Associate Professor of the School of Communications, received 22 awards. This year, the team has 8 first, 6 second, 3 third places and 4 special nominations. And Karina Amdieva was awarded the individual championship cup.

    Photo by: Yulia Korogod

    – The individual assessment included the Olympiad: it is very similar to the Unified State Exam in advertising, only with open tasks – ten questions with atypical cases or situations. For example, you are a PR manager for a mayor who has spoken out sharply on some issue, and you need to conduct anti-crisis communication because he was “exposed” on a federal channel. Or another example: you are a PR manager for a gamer streamer who was invited to give a lecture to students of the journalism department of Moscow State University. What advice would you give him? That is, these are questions that require reflection and a professional approach.

    The second part of the individual championship is the analysis of a communication case. This year it consisted of two stages: online and offline. The online stage is a classic case solution: you are given a problem, you do analytics, formulate input and propose a strategy. At the in-person stage, it was necessary to analyze the Silver Archer case according to the criteria in an hour and a half: evaluate it for compliance with the target audience, the stated results and generally give your expert assessment, – said Karina Admieva, a bachelor’s student “Advertising and Public Relations”.

    Representatives of the companies that provided cases for the Festival – market leaders – emphasized the high level of training of students from HSE.

    As Elena Kharlamova, Deputy Director for Communications of the Krasnoyarsk Representative Office of the Norilsk Nickel Mining and Metallurgical Company, noted: HSE teachers have an incredibly broad vision of everything, they teach students to look at the task from a different angle, in an unconventional way. “The team managed to offer a comprehensive approach, which we take and do! This will all be implemented, you will see it all,” she said at the award ceremony.

    The “Promotion of Territories” competition is part of the team championship of the All-Russian Olympiad in Advertising and Public Relations. It consists of two stages. The first is solving a task in an online format before the festival: this year the task was presented in the form of an analysis of existing narratives for promoting territories to choose from.

    Photo by: Yulia Korogod

    – My team and I analyzed the campaign to promote Kolomna and proposed improved approaches. Following this stage, we and seven other teams were shortlisted, – shared Yulia Korogod, a master’s student “Integrated Communications”.

    The second stage was carried out directly at the festival and included two competitions. The first was related to homework and involved creating creative slogans for the chosen territory. The second competition involved creating a communications campaign to promote one of the places in Southern Yenisei Siberia.

    Photo by: Yulia Korogod

    – The creative framework of our solution was expressed in the contact of man with the universe, which was positively noted by the jury members. Based on the results of two stages of the competition, our team took first place. This result was incredibly desirable and significant. Moreover, for us personally, this became another proof of high preparation at the university, since in the conditions of limited time, various theories and creative frameworks seemed to be in the subcortex, – Yulia Korogod.

    Congratulations to Karina Amdieva, Yulia Korogod, Evgenia Guseva, Ekaterina Solovieva and Stefania Bochkareva on their awards!

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Justified Gatekeeping

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    Justified Gatekeeping

    One important role held by the Traffic Commissioners is that of gatekeepers to the industry. In a recent public inquiry heard by Traffic Commissioner for Wales, Victoria Davies, the importance of this can readily be seen.

    JB Plant & Co Groundworks Limited had applied for a restricted goods vehicle operator’s licence to operate six vehicles and six trailers, but the commissioner had concerns around the applicant’s fitness to hold a licence, his ability to maintain vehicles in a fit and serviceable condition and a failure to submit required financial and attendance information before the hearing.

    Sole director Samuel Burton was convicted in 2019 for serious environmental offences related to illegal waste dumping. He failed to comply with the inquiry case management directions y, claiming non-receipt of inquiry letter until a few days before the hearing, although that was confirmed to have been properly delivered and emailed to him six weeks previously. He produced financial documents very late and after deadlines.

    The Commissioner also heard that the previous operator’s licence held by Burton was revoked in 2001 due to poor maintenance. More recently, he was stopped by DVSA in October 2024 driving an unsafe 12-tonne vehicle; issued an “S” marked prohibition for serious roadworthiness defects, which he attempted to downplay the severity of. An investigation is still ongoing into that matter.

    Commissioner Davies said “The offences for which Mr Burton was previously convicted and sentenced are serious and resulted in a lengthy sentence of imprisonment… he was imprisoned for illegally dumping vast quantities of controlled waste at sites in Swansea and Carmarthenshire.  He also dumped skip loads of rubbish at the rear and front of a house in Llanelli when the customer for whom he had carried out work failed to pay him.  I note the comments made by Judge Thomas in sentencing Burton that he showed a “complete and utter contempt for any regulatory regime” … I also note the evidence about the revocation of the sole trader licence previously held by Samuel Burton and him being stopped by the DVSA on 19 October last year… His ability to maintain vehicles in a fit and roadworthy state has not improved on the evidence before me.”

    The licence application was refused because the applicant failed to satisfy the traffic commissioner that it met the requirements to hold an operator’s licence. The full written decision can be found here.

    For any further details or enquiries, please contact:

    Office of the Traffic Commissioner

    Email: pressoffice@otc.gov.uk

    Updates to this page

    Published 6 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Bluefin tuna catch and release applications re-opened

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    Bluefin tuna catch and release applications re-opened

    Marine Management Organisation (MMO) has re-opened the process to apply for permits for 2025’s bluefin tuna catch and release fishery.

    Applications were paused at the end of April to enable adjustments to guidance and application criteria, focusing on inclusion of relevant experience and training held by masters as well as vessel owners.

    The criteria to be eligible for a permit and the application form now recognise master and skipper training either through the Cefas UK CHART programme or the Recreational Angling Training for Bluefin Tuna Permit Holders 2024 funded by the Government’s Fisheries and Seafood Scheme.

    There is an additional requirement that the individuals with this training must be aboard for each fishing trip if they are awarded a permit.

    MMO’s adjustments to guidance and eligibility mean that interested stakeholders will need to submit a fresh application via the online or paper forms here.

    To take account for the pause in the process, the closing date for submissions has been extended to 2 June 2025 from 18 May 2025.

    Full guidance on this year’s catch and release fishery is available here.

    Updates to this page

    Published 6 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: Enlight Renewable Energy Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    All of the amounts disclosed in this press release are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted

    TEL AVIV, Israel, May 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd. (NASDAQ: ENLT, TASE: ENLT) today reported financial results for the first quarter of 2025 ending March 31, 2025. Registration links for the Company’s earnings English and Hebrew conference call and webcasts can be found at the end of this earnings release.

    Financial Highlights

    3 months ending March 31, 2025

    • Revenues and income of $130m, up 39% year over year
    • Adjusted EBITDA1 of $132m, up 84% year over year
    • Net income of $102m, up 316% year over year
    • Cash flow from operations of $44m, up 24% year over year
      For the three months ended
     ($ millions) 31/03/2025 31/03/2024 % change
    Revenues and Income 130 94 39%
    Net Income 102 24 316%
    Adjusted EBITDA 132 72 84%
    Cash Flow from Operating Activities 44 35 24%

    ________________________
    1 The Company is unable to provide a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net Income on a forward-looking basis without unreasonable effort because items that impact this IFRS financial measure are not within the Company’s control and/or cannot be reasonably predicted. Please refer to the reconciliation table in Appendix 2

    • In January 2025, the Company announced the sale of 44% of the Sunlight cluster of renewable energy projects in Israel for a consideration of $52m at a valuation of $119m, and deconsolidated the cluster from its balance sheet. The transaction added $42m to Adjusted EBITDA (actual consideration received less the book value of the associated assets) and $80m to net profit in the 1Q25 results.
    • A detailed analysis of financial results appears below

    Impact of U.S. Tariffs on the Company’s Operations

    Enlight’s procurement strategy has effectively mitigated significant exposure to increased U.S. import tariffs. The agreements and good relationships we have with our supply chain partners allow for a significant distribution of the impact of tariffs.

    Costs

    • Solar panels for projects under construction are either domestically constructed or sourced from outside China and carry no tariff exposure
    • 80% of battery capacity for projects under construction is supplied by Tesla, a supplier with high levels of domestic U.S. manufacturing

    Revenues

    • Negotiations for PPA price adjustments are now underway to account for higher tariff-related construction costs

    “Enlight showed strong financial results for 1Q25, including 84% growth in Adjusted EBITDA and a 316% rise in net profit,” said Gilad Yavetz, CEO of Enlight Renewable Energy.

    “The introduction of U.S. tariffs underscores how Enlight’s diversified procurement strategy in this market over the past two years has proven itself, effectively shielding us from cost increases. As a result, our U.S. projects now under construction, with total capex of $1.7bn, have no solar panel exposure under the current tariff policy. Selecting Tesla as our primary storage supplier further strengthens this position – its substantial levels of U.S. manufacturing offer greater tariff protection than other battery suppliers.

    “Securing $1.8bn in financing over recent months marks a significant milestone, and was achieved through three financial closings, a sale of a stake in the Sunlight cluster to institutional investors, and a successful bond issuance. This funding will enable the launch of our aggressive plan to begin construction on 4.7 FGW of capacity in 2025. Combined with our existing operating portfolio, these projects represent 90% of the capacity required to reach an annual revenue and income run rate of $1.4bn by 2027.”

    Portfolio Review

    • Enlight’s total portfolio is comprised of 19.2 GW of generation capacity and 49.8 GWh storage (33.4 FGW2)
    • Of this, the Mature portfolio component (including operating projects, projects under construction or pre-construction) contains 6.1 GW generation capacity and 8.8 GWh of storage (8.6 FGW)
    • Within the Mature portfolio component, the operating component has 2.5 GW of generation capacity and 1.9 GWh of storage (3.0 FGW)

    The full composition of the portfolio appears in the following table:

    Component Status FGW2 Annual revenues &
    income run rate ($m)
    Operating Commercial operation 3.0 ~5003
    Under Construction Under construction 1.8 ~305
    Pre-Construction 0-12 months to start of construction 3.8 ~615
    Total Mature Portfolio Mature 8.6 1,420~
    Advanced Development 13-24 months to start of construction 7
    Development 2+ years to start of construction 17.8
    Total Portfolio   33.4

    ________________________
    2 FGW (Factored GW) is a consolidated metric combining generation and storage capacity into a uniform figure based on the ratio of construction costs. The company’s current weighted average construction cost ratio is 3.5 GWh of storage per 1 GW of generation: FGW = GW + GWh / 3.5
    3 Based on the midpoint of 2025 guidance.

    • Operating component of the portfolio: 3 FGW
      • The operational portfolio totals 3 GW of capacity is spread over three regions: 44% of the capacity is located in 7 European countries, 29% is located in Israel, and 27% in the U.S.
      • 81% of the operational capacity sells electricity under PPA agreements, with 29% of the power sold under inflation-linked PPAs.
      • The operational portfolio generates annualized revenues and income of approximately $500 million.
         
    • Under Construction component of the portfolio: 1.8 FGW
      • Consists of three projects in the U.S. with a total capacity of 1.4 FGW; the Gecama Solar project in Spain with a capacity of 0.3 FGW; the solar and storage cluster in Israel; and the addition of storage capacity at project Bjornberget in Sweden. Approximately half of the cluster is expected to reach COD in 2025, with the rest expected to commission in 2026.
      • Projects under construction are expected to contribute $305m to the annual revenues and income run rate during their first full year of operation
         
    • Pre-construction component of the portfolio: 3.8 FGW
       
      • Two mega projects in the U.S., Snowflake and CO Bar, with a combined capacity of 2.6 FGW will begin construction in 2025 and are expected to contribute $455m to revenues and income on an annualized basis.
      • Nardo, a stand alone storage project in Italy with a capacity of 0.25 FGW, is expected to begin construction in 2H25. The Pre-construction portion of the Mature portfolio includes additional projects in Israel, Hungary, and the US with a combined capacity of 0.9 FGW.
      • Pre-construction projects are expected to contribute $615m in revenues and income in their first full year of operations.

        The under construction and pre-construction projects are expected to reach COD by the end of 2027, which is expected to boost operating capacity to 8.6 FGW and the annualized revenue and income run rate to $1.4bn.

    • Advanced Development component of the portfolio component: 7 FGW
      • 5.7 FGW in the U.S., with 100% of the capacity having passed completion of the System Impact Study, the most important study of the grid connection process, significantly de-risking the portfolio.
      • The U.S. pipeline includes several mega-projects, including the 1.4 FGW Cedar Island facility in Oregon and the 1.1 FGW Blackwater project in Virginia.
      • The U.S. portfolio includes several follow-ons to Mature projects, such as Atrisco 2 (0.7 FGW), the energy storage expansion at CO-Bar (0.9 FGW), and Snowflake B (1.3 FGW).
      • These projects reflect the Company’s “Connect and Expand” strategy, leveraging existing grid infrastructure with the development of new ones, thereby reducing construction costs and project risks while improving project returns.
      • 0.7 FGW in Europe, focused on Italy, Spain, and Croatia.
      • 0.6 FGW in MENA, focused on solar and storage projects and stand alone storage facilities, including approximately 0.4 FGW that won availability tariffs as part of the Israel Electricity Authority’s first high voltage storage availability tariff tender.
         
    • Development component of the portfolio: 17.8 FGW
      • 12 FGW in the U.S. with broad geographic presence, including the PJM, WECC, SPP and MISO regions. The storage portion of the US portfolio has grown by 5.6 FGW to reflect greater demand for energy storage in this region.
      • 3 FGW in Europe, focused on Italy, Spain, Croatia and entry into stand-alone storage operations in Poland.
      • 2.8 FGW in MENA, focused on solar combined storage projects and stand-alone storage facilities.

    Mature Portfolio Components Expected to Generate Annualized Revenues and Income of ~$1.4bn4,5

    ________________________
    4 Projection based on 2025 guidance, adding on total revenues and income (sales of electricity and tax benefits) of under construction and pre-construction projects
    5 The company’s revenues from tax benefits are estimated at approximately 20-24% of the total revenue run rate for December 2025; approximately 22-26% of the total revenue run rate for December 2026, and approximately 26-30% of the total revenue run rate for December 2027

    Financing Activities

    • During the quarter, the Company secured $1bn in financial closings for the Country Acres and Quail Ranch projects, representing 830 FMW of combined capacity.
    • Along with the financial close on the 560 FMW Roadrunner project in December 2024, the financing for the second wave of U.S. projects in now complete, with a total of $1.5bn raised.
    • Raising $245m through the sale of Series G and H bonds to finance the Company’s growth.
    • Sale of 44% of the Sunlight cluster for $52m cash at a valuation of $119m, generating Adjusted EBITDA of $42m (actual consideration received less associated book value of assets) and a pre-tax profit of $97m.
    • As of the balance sheet date, the Company maintained $350m of revolving credit facilities, of which none have been drawn.

    2025 Guidance

    Construction and commissioning

    • Expected commissioning of 0.9 FGW of capacity, which is expected to add approximately $148-152m to annualized revenues and income and $129-133m annualized EBITDA, starting in 2026.
    • Starting construction on 2.9 FGW of capacity, which is expected to add approximately $487-495m in annualized revenues and income and approximately $428-436m in annualized EBITDA gradually through 2026-2027.

    Financial guidance

    • Total revenues and income6 for 2025 are expected to range between $490m and $510m. Of the projected revenues and income, 38% are expected to be denominated in ILS, 35% in EUR, and 27% in USD.
    • Adjusted EBITDA7 for 2025 is expected to range between $360m and $380m.
    • Approximately 90% of the electricity volumes expected to be generated in 2025 will be sold at fixed prices through PPAs or hedges.

    ________________________
    6 Total revenues and income include revenues from the sale of electricity along with income from tax benefits from US projects amounting to $60m-80m.
    7 EBITDA is a non-IFRS financial measure. The Company is unable to provide a reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Income on a forward-looking basis without unreasonable effort because items that impact this IFRS financial measure are not within the Company’s control and/or cannot be reasonably predicted. Please refer to the reconciliation table in Appendix 2.

    Financial Results Analysis

    Revenues & Income by Segment
    ($ millions) For the three months ended  
    Segment 31/03/2025 31/03/2024 % change
    MENA 42,867 28,474 51%
    Europe 51,384 59,160 (13%)
    U.S. 34,789 4,495 674%
    Other 829 1,532 (46%)
    Total Revenues & Income 129,869 93,661 39%


    Revenues & Income

    In the first quarter of 2025, the Company’s total revenues and income increased to $130m, up from $94m last year, a growth rate of 39% year over year. This was composed of revenues from the sale of electricity, which rose 21% to $110m compared to $90m in the same period of 2024, as well as recognition of $20m in income from tax benefits, up 516% compared to $3m in 1Q24.

    The Company benefited from the revenues and income contribution of newly operational projects. Since the first quarter of last year, 576 MW and 1,526 MWh of new projects were connected to the grid and began selling electricity, including seven of the Israel Solar and Storage Cluster units in Israel, Atrisco in the U.S, Pupin in Serbia, and Tapolca in Hungary. The most important increases in revenue from the sale of electricity originated at Atrisco, which added $13m, followed by the Israel Solar and Storage Cluster, with $11m, while Pupin contributed $6m. In total, new projects contributed $30m to revenues from the sale of electricity.

    Offsetting this growth, the amount of electricity generated at our wind projects operating in Europe was lower compared to the same period last year mainly due to weaker wind volumes. In addition, generation at project Bjornberget in Sweden this quarter fell compared to last year due to a blade malfunction experienced at one of the site’s turbines. This prompted a complete shutdown of the wind farm, which is now in the process of gradually resuming operations. The Company recognized compensation of $4m from Bjornberget’s operating contractor in lieu of the lost revenues, which is recorded in other income.

    Revenues and income were distributed between MENA, Europe, and the US, with 34% denominated in Israeli Shekel, 39% in Euros, and 27% denominated in US Dollars.

    Net Income

    In the first quarter of 2025, the Company’s net income amounted to $102m compared to $24m last year, an increase of 316% year over year. This increase stems from the $28m increase in revenues and income and $80m profit from the partial sale of the Sunlight cluster. This was offset by higher total operating expenses of $17m and net financial expenses of $10m (all after tax).

    Adjusted EBITDA8

    The Company’s Adjusted EBITDA grew by 84% to $132m in the first quarter of 2025, compared to $72m for the same period in 2024. Of this increase, $36m was driven by the factors described in the Revenues and Income section. The partial sale of the Sunlight cluster contributed $42m, representing the actual consideration received less the book value of the associated assets. Offsetting this growth was an increase of $11m in COGS linked to the addition of new projects, and an increase of $4m in operating expenses. Adjusting for the effects of this transaction, 1Q25 Adjusted EBITDA grew by 25% year-on-year to $90m.

    ________________________
    8 Adjusted EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure. Please see the appendix of this presentation for a reconciliation to Net Income

    Conference Call Information

    Enlight plans to hold its First Quarter 2025 Conference Call and Webcasts on Tuesday, May 6, 2025 to review its financial results and business outlook in both English and Hebrew. Management will deliver prepared remarks followed by a question-and-answer session. Participants can join by dial-in or webcast:

    Upon registering, you will be emailed a dial-in number, direct passcode and unique PIN.

    The press release with the financial results as well as the investor presentation materials will be accessible from the Company’s website prior to the conference call. Approximately one hour after completion of the live call, an archived version of the webcast will be available on the Company’s investor relations website at https://enlightenergy.co.il/info/investors/.

    Supplemental Financial and Other Information

    We intend to announce material information to the public through the Enlight investor relations website at https://enlightenergy.co.il/info/investors, SEC filings, press releases, public conference calls, and public webcasts. We use these channels to communicate with our investors, customers, and the public about our company, our offerings, and other issues. As such, we encourage investors, the media, and others to follow the channels listed above, and to review the information disclosed through such channels. Any updates to the list of disclosure channels through which we will announce information will be posted on the investor relations page of our website.

    Non-IFRS Financial Measures

    This release presents Adjusted EBITDA, a financial metric, which is provided as a complement to the results provided in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IFRS”). A reconciliation of the non-IFRS financial information to the most directly comparable IFRS financial measure is provided in the accompanying tables found at the end of this release.

    We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income (loss) plus depreciation and amortization, share based compensation, finance expenses, taxes on income and share in losses of equity accounted investees and minus finance income and non-recurring portions of other income, net. For the purposes of calculating Adjusted EBITDA, compensation for inadequate performance of goods and services procured by the Company are included in other income, net. Compensation for inadequate performance of goods and services reflects the profits the Company would have generated under regular operating conditions and is therefore included in Adjusted EBITDA. With respect to gains (losses) from asset disposals, as part of Enlight’s strategy to accelerate growth and reduce the need for equity financing, the Company sells parts of or the entirety of selected renewable project assets from time to time, and therefore includes realized gains or losses from these asset disposals in Adjusted EBITDA. In the case of partial assets disposals, Adjusted EBITDA includes only the actual consideration less the book value of the assets sold. Our management believes Adjusted EBITDA is indicative of operational performance and ongoing profitability and uses Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate the operating performance and for planning and forecasting purposes.

    Non-IFRS financial measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for financial information presented under IFRS. There are a number of limitations related to the use of non-IFRS financial measures versus comparable financial measures determined under IFRS. For example, other companies in our industry may calculate the non-IFRS financial measures that we use differently or may use other measures to evaluate their performance. All of these limitations could reduce the usefulness of our non-IFRS financial measures as analytical tools. Investors are encouraged to review the related IFRS financial measure, Net Income, and the reconciliations of Adjusted EBITDA provided below to Net Income and to not rely on any single financial measure to evaluate our business.

    Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements as contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements contained in this press release other than statements of historical fact, including, without limitation, statements regarding the Company’s business strategy and plans, capabilities of the Company’s project portfolio and achievement of operational objectives, market opportunity, utility demand and potential growth, discussions with commercial counterparties and financing sources, pricing trends for materials, progress of Company projects, including anticipated timing of related approvals and project completion and anticipated production delays, the Company’s future financial results, expected impact from various regulatory developments and anticipated trade sanctions, expectations regarding wind production, electricity prices and windfall taxes, and Revenues and Income and Adjusted EBITDA guidance, the expected timing of completion of our ongoing projects, and the Company’s anticipated cash requirements and financing plans , are forward-looking statements. The words “may,” “might,” “will,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “target,” “seek,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” “contemplate,” “possible,” “forecasts,” “aims” or the negative of these terms and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, though not all forward-looking statements use these words or expressions.

    These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following: our ability to site suitable land for, and otherwise source, renewable energy projects and to successfully develop and convert them into Operational Projects; availability of, and access to, interconnection facilities and transmission systems; our ability to obtain and maintain governmental and other regulatory approvals and permits, including environmental approvals and permits; construction delays, operational delays and supply chain disruptions leading to increased cost of materials required for the construction of our projects, as well as cost overruns and delays related to disputes with contractors; disruptions in trade caused by political, social or economic instability in regions where our components and materials are made; our suppliers’ ability and willingness to perform both existing and future obligations; competition from traditional and renewable energy companies in developing renewable energy projects; potential slowed demand for renewable energy projects and our ability to enter into new offtake contracts on acceptable terms and prices as current offtake contracts expire; offtakers’ ability to terminate contracts or seek other remedies resulting from failure of our projects to meet development, operational or performance benchmarks; exposure to market prices in some of our offtake contracts; various technical and operational challenges leading to unplanned outages, reduced output, interconnection or termination issues; the dependence of our production and revenue on suitable meteorological and environmental conditions, and our ability to accurately predict such conditions; our ability to enforce warranties provided by our counterparties in the event that our projects do not perform as expected; government curtailment, energy price caps and other government actions that restrict or reduce the profitability of renewable energy production; electricity price volatility, unusual weather conditions (including the effects of climate change, could adversely affect wind and solar conditions), catastrophic weather-related or other damage to facilities, unscheduled generation outages, maintenance or repairs, unanticipated changes to availability due to higher demand, shortages, transportation problems or other developments, environmental incidents, or electric transmission system constraints and the possibility that we may not have adequate insurance to cover losses as a result of such hazards; our dependence on certain operational projects for a substantial portion of our cash flows; our ability to continue to grow our portfolio of projects through successful acquisitions; changes and advances in technology that impair or eliminate the competitive advantage of our projects or upsets the expectations underlying investments in our technologies; our ability to effectively anticipate and manage cost inflation, interest rate risk, currency exchange fluctuations and other macroeconomic conditions that impact our business; our ability to retain and attract key personnel; our ability to manage legal and regulatory compliance and litigation risk across our global corporate structure; our ability to protect our business from, and manage the impact of, cyber-attacks, disruptions and security incidents, as well as acts of terrorism or war; changes to existing renewable energy industry policies and regulations that present technical, regulatory and economic barriers to renewable energy projects; the reduction, elimination or expiration of government incentives or benefits for, or regulations mandating the use of, renewable energy; our ability to effectively manage the global expansion of the scale of our business operations; our ability to perform to expectations in our new line of business involving the construction of PV systems for municipalities in Israel; our ability to effectively manage our supply chain and comply with applicable regulations with respect to international trade relations, the impact of tariffs on the cost of construction and our ability to mitigate such impact, sanctions, export controls and anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws; our ability to effectively comply with Environmental Health and Safety and other laws and regulations and receive and maintain all necessary licenses, permits and authorizations; our performance of various obligations under the terms of our indebtedness (and the indebtedness of our subsidiaries that we guarantee) and our ability to continue to secure project financing on attractive terms for our projects; limitations on our management rights and operational flexibility due to our use of tax equity arrangements; potential claims and disagreements with partners, investors and other counterparties that could reduce our right to cash flows generated by our projects; our ability to comply with increasingly complex tax laws of various jurisdictions in which we currently operate as well as the tax laws in jurisdictions in which we intend to operate in the future; the unknown effect of the dual listing of our ordinary shares on the price of our ordinary shares; various risks related to our incorporation and location in Israel, including the ongoing war in Israel, where our headquarters and some of our wind energy and solar energy projects are located; the costs and requirements of being a public company, including the diversion of management’s attention with respect to such requirements; certain provisions in our Articles of Association and certain applicable regulations that may delay or prevent a change of control; and other risk factors set forth in the section titled “Risk factors” in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), as may be updated in our other documents filed with or furnished to the SEC.

    These statements reflect management’s current expectations regarding future events and operating performance and speak only as of the date of this press release. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee that future results, levels of activity, performance and events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or will occur. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date on which the statements are made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

    About Enlight

    Founded in 2008, Enlight develops, finances, constructs, owns, and operates utility-scale renewable energy projects. Enlight operates across the three largest renewable segments today: solar, wind and energy storage. A global platform, Enlight operates in the United States, Israel and 10 European countries. Enlight has been traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange since 2010 (TASE: ENLT) and completed its U.S. IPO (Nasdaq: ENLT) in 2023.

    Company Contacts

    Yonah Weisz
    Director IR
    investors@enlightenergy.co.il

    Erica Mannion or Mike Funari
    Sapphire Investor Relations, LLC
    +1 617 542 6180
    investors@enlightenergy.co.il

    Appendix 1 – Financial information

    Consolidated Statements of Income    
        For the three months ended at
    March 31
        2025   2024(*)
        USD in   USD in 
        Thousands   Thousands
             
    Revenues   109,758   90,397
    Tax benefits   20,111   3,264
    Total revenues and income   129,869   93,661
             
    Cost of sales (**)   (26,638)   (15,436)
    Depreciation and amortization   (33,789)   (25,604)
    General and administrative expenses   (11,846)   (8,859)
    Development expenses   (2,564)   (2,418)
    Total operating expenses   (74,837)   (52,317)
    Gains from projects disposals   97,262   27
    Other income (expenses), net   (1,105)   1,517
    Operating profit   151,189   42,888
             
    Finance income   6,695   8,065
    Finance expenses   (30,203)   (19,493)
    Total finance expenses, net   (23,508)   (11,428)
             
    Profit before tax and equity loss   127,681   31,460
    Share of losses of equity accounted investees   (1,227)   (144)
    Profit before income taxes   126,454   31,316
    Taxes on income   (24,651)   (6,831)
    Profit for the period   101,803   24,485
             
    Profit for the period attributed to:        
    Owners of the Company   94,458   16,763
    Non-controlling interests   7,345   7,722
        101,803   24,485
    Earnings per ordinary share (in USD) with a par value of        
    NIS 0.1, attributable to owners of the parent Company:        
    Basic earnings per share   0.80   0.14
    Diluted earnings per share   0.75   0.14
    Weighted average of share capital used in the        
    calculation of earnings:        
    Basic per share   118,783,541   117,963,310
    Diluted per share   125,316,177   122,889,909
             

    (*) The Consolidated Statements of Income have been adjusted to present comparable information for the previous period. For additional details please see Appendix 8.
    (**) Excluding depreciation and amortization.

    Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of        
             
        March 31   December 31
        2025   2024
        USD in   USD in
        Thousands   Thousands
    Assets        
             
    Current assets        
    Cash and cash equivalents   449,530   387,427
    Restricted cash   82,692   87,539
    Trade receivables   73,125   50,692
    Other receivables   71,475   99,651
    Other financial assets   405   975
    Assets of disposal groups classified as held for sale     81,661
    Total current assets   677,227   707,945
             
    Non-current assets        
    Restricted cash   59,964   60,802
    Other long-term receivables   62,092   61,045
    Deferred costs in respect of projects   392,119   357,358
    Deferred borrowing costs   61   276
    Loans to investee entities   32,329   18,112
    Investments in equity accounted investees   49,303  
    Fixed assets, net   3,961,021   3,699,192
    Intangible assets, net   293,035   291,442
    Deferred taxes assets   8,023   10,744
    Right-of-use asset, net   210,739   210,941
    Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss   74,555   69,216
    Other financial assets   63,903   59,812
    Total non-current assets   5,207,144   4,838,940
             
    Total assets   5,884,371   5,546,885
             
    Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of (Cont.)        
             
        March 31   December 31
        2025   2024
        USD in   USD in
        Thousands   Thousands
    Liabilities and equity        
             
    Current liabilities        
    Credit and current maturities of loans from banks and other financial institutions   207,662   212,246
    Trade payables   167,765   161,991
    Other payables   101,928   107,825
    Current maturities of debentures   23,049   44,962
    Current maturities of lease liability   10,192   10,240
    Other financial liabilities   5,777   8,141
    Liabilities of disposal groups classified as held for sale     46,635
    Total current liabilities   516,373   592,040
             
    Non-current liabilities        
    Debentures   549,517   433,994
    Other financial liabilities   118,891   107,865
    Convertible debentures   232,536   133,056
    Loans from banks and other financial institutions   2,024,315   1,996,137
    Loans from non-controlling interests   79,081   75,598
    Financial liabilities through profit or loss   25,985   25,844
    Deferred taxes liabilities   62,310   41,792
    Employee benefits   1,092   1,215
    Lease liability   209,958   211,941
    Deferred income related to tax equity   387,943   403,384
    Asset retirement obligation   85,141   83,085
    Total non-current liabilities   3,776,769   3,513,911
             
    Total liabilities   4,293,142   4,105,951
             
    Equity        
    Ordinary share capital   3,323   3,308
    Share premium   1,028,528   1,028,532
    Capital reserves   49,890   25,273
    Proceeds on account of convertible options   25,083   15,494
    Accumulated profit   202,377   107,919
    Equity attributable to shareholders of the Company   1,309,201   1,180,526
    Non-controlling interests   282,028   260,408
    Total equity   1,591,229   1,440,934
    Total liabilities and equity   5,884,371   5,546,885
             
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows        
             
        For the three months ended
    at March 31
        2025   2024
        USD in   USD in
        Thousands   Thousands
             
    Cash flows for operating activities        
    Profit for the period   101,803   24,485
             
    Income and expenses not associated with cash flows:        
    Depreciation and amortization   33,789   25,604
    Finance expenses, net   22,388   11,486
    Share-based compensation   1,710   3,117
    Taxes on income   24,651   6,831
    Tax benefits   (20,111)   (3,264)
    Other income (expenses), net   1,105   (134)
    Company’s share in losses of investee partnerships   1,227   144
    Gains from projects disposals   (97,262)   (27)
        (32,503)   43,757
             
    Changes in assets and liabilities items:        
    Change in other receivables   (856)   (2,142)
    Change in trade receivables   (20,376)   (16,909)
    Change in other payables   8,604   (539)
    Change in trade payables   7,802   71
        (4,826)   (19,519)
             
    Interest receipts   2,512   2,928
    Interest paid   (22,298)   (15,624)
    Income Tax paid   (1,075)   (798)
             
    Net cash from operating activities   43,613   35,229
             
    Cash flows for investing activities        
    Sale (Acquisition) of consolidated entities, net   36,223   (1,388)
    Changes in restricted cash and bank deposits, net   8,176   (4,988)
    Purchase, development, and construction in respect of projects   (255,862)   (199,733)
    Loans provided and Investment in investees   (7,430)   (11,284)
    Repayments of loans from investees   30,815  
    Payments on account of acquisition of consolidated entity   (7,447)   (10,851)
    Purchase of financial assets measured at fair value through profit or loss, net   (3,040)   (8,409)
    Net cash used in investing activities   (198,565)   (236,653)
             
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Cont.)      
        For the three months ended at March 31
        2025   2024
        USD in   USD in
        Thousands   Thousands
             
    Cash flows from financing activities        
    Receipt of loans from banks and other financial institutions   143,578   71,371
    Repayment of loans from banks and other financial institutions   (108,922)   (10,448)
    Issuance of debentures   125,838  
    Issuance of convertible debentures   114,685  
    Repayment of debentures   (21,994)   (1,284)
    Dividends and distributions by subsidiaries to non-controlling interests     (108)
    Deferred borrowing costs   (35,199)   (2,682)
    Repayment of loans from non-controlling interests     (955)
    Increase in holding rights of consolidated entity   (1,392)  
    Exercise of share options   11  
    Repayment of lease liability   (4,058)   (3,671)
    Proceeds from investment in entities by non-controlling interest   7,732   152
             
    Net cash from financing activities   220,279   52,375
             
    Increase (Decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   65,327   (149,049)
             
    Balance of cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period   387,427   403,805
             
    Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash and cash equivalents   (3,224)   (4,905)
             
    Cash and cash equivalents at end of period   449,530   249,851
             


    Information related to Segmental Reporting

      For the three months ended at March 31, 2025
      MENA(**)   Europe(**)  

    USA

      Total reportable segments   Others   Total
      USD in thousands
    Revenues 42,867   51,384   14,678   108,929   829   109,758
    Tax benefits     20,111   20,111     20,111
    Total revenues and income 42,867   51,384   34,789   129,040   829   129,869
                           
    Segment adjusted EBITDA 68,017   44,663   30,549   143,229   81   143,310
         
    Reconciliations of unallocated amounts:    
    Headquarter costs (*)   (11,701)
    Intersegment profit   106
    Gains from projects disposals   54,973
    Depreciation and amortization and share-based compensation   (35,499)
    Operating profit   151,189
    Finance income   6,695
    Finance expenses   (30,203)
    Share in the losses of equity accounted investees   (1,227)
    Profit before income taxes   126,454
         

    (*) Including general and administrative and development expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization and share based compensation).

    (**) Due to the Company’s organizational restructuring, the Chief Operation Decision Maker (CODM) now reviews the group’s results by segmenting them into three business units: MENA (Middle East and North Africa), Europe, and the US. Consequently, the Central/Eastern Europe and Western Europe segments have been consolidated into the “Europe” segment, the Israel segment has been incorporated into the MENA segment, and the Management and Construction segment has been excluded. The comparative figures for the three months ended March 31, 2024, have been updated accordingly.

    Information related to Segmental Reporting

      For the three months ended at March 31, 2024
      MENA   Europe  

    USA

      Total reportable segments   Others   Total
      USD in thousands
    Revenues 28,474   59,160   1,231   88,865   1,532   90,397
    Tax benefits     3,264   3,264     3,264
    Total revenues and income 28,474   59,160   4,495   92,129   1,532   93,661
                           
    Segment adjusted EBITDA 24,528   50,707   3,122   78,357   668   79,025
         
    Reconciliations of unallocated amounts:    
    Headquarter costs (*)   (7,606)
    Intersegment profit   190
    Depreciation and amortization and share-based compensation   (28,721)
    Operating profit   42,888
    Finance income   8,065
    Finance expenses   (19,493)
    Share in the losses of equity accounted investees   (144)
    Profit before income taxes   31,316
         

    (*) Including general and administrative and development expenses (excluding depreciation and amortization and share based compensation).

    Appendix 2 – Reconciliations between Net Income to Adjusted EBITDA

     
    ($ thousands)   For the three months ended at
        March 31, 2025   March 31, 2024
    Net Income   101,803   24,485
    Depreciation and amortization   33,789   25,604
    Share based compensation   1,710   3,117
    Finance income   (6,695)   (8,065)
    Finance expenses   30,203   19,493
    Gains from projects disposals (*)   (54,973)  
    Share of losses of equity accounted investees   1,227   144
    Taxes on income   24,651   6,831
    Adjusted EBITDA   131,715   71,609
             
    * Profit from revaluation linked to partial sale of asset.
       

    Appendix 3 – Debentures Covenants

    Debentures Covenants

    As of March 31, 2025, the Company was in compliance with all of its financial covenants under the indenture for the Series C, D, F, G and H Debentures, based on having achieved the following in its consolidated financial results:

    Minimum equity

    The company’s equity shall be maintained at no less than NIS 375 million so long as debentures F remain outstanding, NIS 1,250 million so long as debentures C and D remain outstanding, and USD 600 million so long as debentures G and H remain outstanding.

    As of March 31, 2025, the company’s equity amounted to NIS 5,916 million (USD 1,591 million).

    Net financial debt to net CAP

    The ratio of standalone net financial debt to net CAP shall not exceed 70% for two consecutive financial periods so long as debentures F remain outstanding and shall not exceed 65% for two consecutive financial periods so long as debentures C, D, G and H remain outstanding.

    As of March 31, 2025, the net financial debt to net CAP ratio, as defined above, stands at 36%.

    Net financial debt to EBITDA

    So long as debentures F remain outstanding, standalone financial debt shall not exceed NIS 10 million, and the consolidated financial debt to EBITDA ratio shall not exceed 18 for more than two consecutive financial periods.

    For as long as debentures C and D remain outstanding, the consolidated financial debt to EBITDA ratio shall not exceed 15 for more than two consecutive financial periods.

    For as long as debentures G and H remain outstanding, the consolidated financial debt to EBITDA ratio shall not exceed 17 for more than two consecutive financial periods.

    As of March 31, 2025, the net financial debt to EBITDA ratio, as defined above, stands at 8.

    Equity to balance sheet

    The standalone equity to total balance sheet ratio shall be maintained at no less than 20% ,25% and 28%, respectively, for two consecutive financial periods for as long as debentures F, debentures C and D and debentures G and H remain outstanding.

    As of March 31, 2025, the equity to balance sheet ratio, as defined above, stands at 55%.

    An infographic accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/94346603-d361-4e84-aabc-62db3e22c10c

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Brand Scotland backing for female entrepreneurs

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    Brand Scotland backing for female entrepreneurs

    Minister Kirsty McNeill champions all-women exporting power with female-led business roundtable hosted at Scotland Office Edinburgh HQ

    Scottish female entrepreneurs are getting direct access to the UK Government’s global trade expertise as Scotland Office Minister Kirsty McNeill urged women business leaders to join her on the first all-female Brand Scotland trade mission.

    The Scotland Office hosted a gathering of female business leaders from across Scotland on Thursday 1 May to identify and tackle any export challenges they face. Minister McNeill wanted to bring together business professionals to boost the success of women-led firms in the worldwide market.

    It’s part of the department’s Brand Scotland mission, to sell Scotland’s unique strengths around the world – promoting our goods and services to new markets, helping Scottish businesses export, and supporting trade missions to key global markets to unlock jobs and investment for the future.

    At the roundtable discussion event in Edinburgh Minister McNeill asked for the views of company leaders across the technology, sustainability, clean energy and beauty sectors, as well as from representatives of the Scottish Chambers of Commerce, the Confederation of British Industry and Women’s Enterprise Scotland.

    Minister McNeill said:

    From science and sustainability to culture and financial services, we’re amongst the best in the world – and by selling Scotland globally, we can unlock jobs and investment, an essential part of our Plan for Change.

    It’s crucial that I hear from Scottish businesswomen about the barriers they face, find out what we can do to help, and demonstrate how Scottish companies can really benefit from having direct informal access like this to the UK’s vast global network of trade expertise. By harnessing the combined resources of the Scotland Office, the Foreign Office and Department for Business and Trade, we can create significant opportunities for women entrepreneurs.

    We’re already seeing positive results from championing Brand Scotland internationally and I’m committed to unlocking more global opportunities for Scottish women in business.

    The roundtable discussion addressed three key challenges – how businesses can access finance and investment, overcoming export barriers, and tackling market access issues that disproportionately affect women-led businesses.

    Ideas and suggestions from the meeting will directly shape the Scotland Office’s all-women trade mission to Madrid in June where Minister McNeill will use diplomatic networks to expand markets for British exporters and meet with the Spanish business community to strengthen trade links. Representatives of Scottish female-led companies are being invited to join.

    Background

    • Brand Scotland is about selling Scotland’s unique strengths around the world – promoting our goods and services to new markets, helping Scottish businesses export, and funding and supporting trade missions to key global markets to unlock jobs and investment for the future. 

    • As part of this, the Scotland Office will lead trade missions to sell Scotland and its products to the world, encourage inward investment in Scotland and encourage Scottish firms to export to overseas markets – often for the first time. All this will drive growth and jobs here in Scotland. 

    • The Budget allocated an additional £750k for the Scottish Secretary and the Scotland Office to develop the Brand Scotland programme. 
    • The Scottish Secretary has already made trade trips to Norway, South East Asia and the US. Minister McNeill’s first trade trip will be to Madrid in June.

    Updates to this page

    Published 6 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Reforms to get Britain building will boost economy by billions

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Reforms to get Britain building will boost economy by billions

    New analysis shows economy could be boosted by up to £7.5 billion over the next decade thanks to the pro-growth Planning and Infrastructure Bill

    Planning reforms to accelerate the delivery of new homes, roads and railways, and clean energy projects will boost the UK economy by billions of pounds, according to new analysis.

    The Planning and Infrastructure Bill’s Impact Assessment, published today (Tuesday, May 6) has shown the government’s pro-growth changes to get Britain building could benefit the economy by up to £7.5 billion over the next 10 years.

    A growing economy is at the heart of our Plan for Change to improve the lives of hard working people and by making it quicker and easier to build 1.5 million new homes, the reforms will turn the tide of the housing crisis and ensure critical infrastructure – including public transport links and clean energy projects that will protect billpayers – is sped up.

    Lower costs for businesses, fewer delays and more certainty as a result of the Bill’s measures could lead to further investment and provide an additional boost to the economy.

    Even this assessment is expected to be an underestimate of the true economic value the reforms will have in boosting development. The current assessment also does not account for recent amendments to the Bill to overhaul the pre-application stage for critical infrastructure, which government analysis suggests will add another £1 billion over this Parliament. 

    This huge boost to the economy is on top of the measures already implemented in the new pro-growth National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). The Office for Budget Responsibility recently said the changes to NPPF alone will drive housebuilding to its highest level in over 40 years, and deliver an additional £6.8 billion by 2029/2030. 

    Deputy Prime Minister and Housing Secretary, Angela Rayner said:

    “Getting Britain building will not only boost economic growth but ensure we deliver the homes and infrastructure working people deserve. 

    “This landmark pro-growth Bill will get spades in the ground and the foundations laid for a new generation of homes, as we deliver on our Plan for Change.” 

    The analysis has also been given a ‘green rating’ by the Regulatory Policy Committee, which means the assessment is considered robust and fit for purpose by the independent scrutiny body that considers them.

    The Bill will help deliver on the Plan for Change by streamlining the building of 1.5 million homes and crucial infrastructure needed to make Britain a clean energy superpower and protect billpayers and reduce future energy shocks.

    This will help put money back into the pockets of working people and support the government’s push to make at least 150 decisions on major infrastructure projects this Parliament, with 17 decided so far.  

    Further reforms tabled at Committee Stage, and not included in the impact assessment, will streamline the pre-application process for windfarms, new roads and other major infrastructure projects. 

    For more information:

    • The government has now published its impact assessment for the Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which has now received a green rating from the Regulatory Policy Committee. This can be read in full here.
    • The analysis includes higher, central and lower estimates for how much money the Bill could add to the economy over 10 years. The highest estimate was up to £7.5 billion, the central estimate was £3.2 billion and the lower estimate was £1.3 billion. 
    • This assessment does not include the amendments tabled at the Committee Stage, which the government predicts will further boost the economy by £1 billion over the course of this Parliament. 
    • It is expected to be an underestimate of the true impact as there will be ‘wider, un-monetised benefits such as the benefit to society from quicker delivery of housing and infrastructure, and the macroeconomic contribution of increased development supported by the Bill”. 

    • The Bill will deliver a range of measures to speed up the delivery of critical infrastructure and 1.5 million homes.

    • The OBR analysis of the National Planning Policy Framework forecast 0.2% to be added to GDP by 2029/30– worth around £6.8bn in today’s prices.

    Updates to this page

    Published 6 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: Marquette National Corporation Reports First Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO, May 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Marquette National Corporation (OTCQX: MNAT) today reported net loss of $2.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, compared to net income of $8.5 million for the first three months of 2024. The loss per share for the first three months of 2025 was $(0.67), as compared to income of $1.93 per share for the comparable period in 2024.

    At March 31, 2025, total assets were $2.217 billion, an increase of $9.6 million, compared to $2.208 billion at December 31, 2024. Total loans increased by $4.6 million, to $1.410 billion compared to $1.405 billion at the end of 2024. Total deposits increased by $10.3 million, or 1%, to $1.750 billion compared to $1.740 billion at the end of 2024.

    Paul M. McCarthy, Chairman & CEO, said, “the primary reason for the decrease in consolidated earnings was a lower level of unrealized gains on the Company’s equity portfolio in the first quarter of 2025. The decrease in unrealized gains on the Company’s equity portfolio was partially offset by an increase in net interest income. Other comprehensive income was positive for the first quarter and helped deliver an increase to tangible book value per share for the first quarter.”

    Marquette National Corporation is a diversified financial holding company and the parent of Marquette Bank, a full-service, community bank that serves the financial needs of communities in Chicagoland. The Bank has branches located in: Chicago, Bolingbrook, Bridgeview, Evergreen Park, Hickory Hills, Lemont, New Lenox, Oak Forest, Oak Lawn, Orland Park, Summit and Tinley Park, Illinois.

    For further information on financial results, visit: https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MNAT/disclosure.

    Special Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements. 
    This document contains, and future oral and written statements of the Company and its management may contain, forward-looking statements with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business of the Company. Forward-looking statements, which may be based upon beliefs, expectations and assumptions of the Company’s management and on information currently available to management, are generally identifiable by the use of words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “bode”, “predict,” “suggest,” “project”, “appear,” “plan,” “intend,” “estimate,” ”annualize,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “likely,” “might,” “potential,” “continue,” “annualized,” “target,” “outlook,” as well as the negative forms of those words, or other similar expressions. Additionally, all statements in this document, including forward-looking statements, speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update any statement in light of new information or future events.

    A number of factors, many of which are beyond the ability of the Company to control or predict, could cause actual results to differ materially from those in its forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to: (i) the strength of the local, state, national and international economies and financial markets (including effects of inflationary pressures and supply chain constraints); (ii) effects on the U.S. economy resulting from the implementation of policies proposed by the new presidential administration, including tariffs, mass deportations and tax regulations; (iii) the economic impact of any future terrorist threats and attacks, widespread disease or pandemics, acts of war or threats thereof (including the Russian invasion of Ukraine and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East), or other adverse events that could cause economic deterioration or instability in credit markets, and the response of the local, state and national governments to any such adverse external events; (iv) new or revised accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by state and federal regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; (v) changes in local, state and federal laws, regulations and governmental policies concerning the Company’s general business and any changes in response to the bank failures in 2023; (vi) the imposition of tariffs or other governmental policies impacting the value of products produced by the Company’s commercial borrowers; (vii) increased competition in the financial services sector, including from non-bank competitors such as credit unions and fintech companies, and the inability to attract new customers; (viii) changes in technology and the ability to develop and maintain secure and reliable electronic systems; (ix) unexpected results of acquisitions which may include failure to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions and the possibility that transaction costs may be greater than anticipated; (x) the loss of key executives and employees, talent shortages and employee turnover; (xi) changes in consumer spending; (xii) unexpected outcomes and costs of existing or new litigation or other legal proceedings and regulatory actions involving the Company; (xiii) the economic impact on the Company and its customers of climate change, natural disasters and exceptional weather occurrences such as tornadoes, floods and blizzards; (xiv) fluctuations in the value of securities held in our securities portfolio, including as a result of changes in interest rates; (xv) credit risk and risks from concentrations (by type of borrower, geographic area, collateral and industry) within our loan portfolio and large loans to certain borrowers (including CRE loans); (xvi) the overall health of the local and national real estate market; (xvii) the ability to maintain an adequate level of allowance for credit losses on loans; (xviii) the concentration of large deposits from certain clients who have balances above current FDIC insurance limits and who may withdraw deposits to diversify their exposure; (xix) the ability to successfully manage liquidity risk, which may increase dependence on non-core funding sources such as brokered deposits, and may negatively impact the Company’s cost of funds; (xx) the level of non-performing assets on our balance sheets; (xxi) interruptions involving our information technology and communications systems or third-party servicers; (xxii) the occurrence of fraudulent activity, breaches or failures of our third-party vendors’ information security controls or cybersecurity-related incidents, including as a result of sophisticated attacks using artificial intelligence and similar tools or as a result of insider fraud; (xxiii) changes in the interest rates and repayment rates of the Company’s assets; (xxiv) the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management framework, and (xxv) the ability of the Company to manage the risks associated with the foregoing as well as anticipated. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements.

    Marquette National Corporation and Subsidiaries
    Financial Highlights
    (Unaudited)
    (in thousands, except share and per share data)
                     
    Balance Sheet
      03/31/25   12/31/24   Percent
    Change
     
                     
    Total assets $2,217,293     $2,207,663     0 %
    Total loans, net 1,395,105     1,390,799     0 %
    Total deposits 1,750,071     1,739,799     1 %
    Total stockholders’ equity 174,216     173,579     0 %
                     
    Shares outstanding 4,367,449     4,367,477     0 %
    Book value per share $39.89     $39.74     0 %
    Tangible book value per share $31.80     $31.65     0 %
                     
    Operating Results
      Three Months Ended March 31,   Percent
    Change
     
      2025   2024      
    Net Interest income $12,098     $11,025     10 %
    Provision for credit losses 328     200     64 %
    Realized securities gains, net 6,316     215       *
    Unrealized holding gains (losses) on equity securities and exchange traded funds (11,963 )   9,860       *
    Other income 3,658     4,331     -16 %
    Other expense 14,086     13,835     2 %
    Income tax expense (benefit) (1,357 )   2,930       *
                     
    Net income (loss) (2,948 )   8,466       *
                     
    Basic and fully diluted earnings (loss) per share $(0.67 )   $1.93       *
    Weighted average shares outstanding 4,367,473     4,381,148     0 %
                     
    Cash dividends declared per share $0.31     $0.28     11 %
                     
    Comprehensive income $1,992     $7,404     -73 %
                     
    * Not meaningful
                     

    For more information:
    Patrick Hunt
    EVP & CFO
    708-364-9019
    phunt@emarquettebank.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Russia: China, European Parliament Decide to Lift Restrictions on Mutual Exchanges – Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesman

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    Xinhua | 06. 05. 2025

    Keywords: representative of the Chinese Foreign Ministry, mutual exchanges, remove, decided, parliament, restrictions, China, representative of the Ministry, of Chinese Affairs, reported, Tuesday

    BEIJING, May 6 (Xinhua) — China and the European Parliament have mutually agreed to simultaneously and comprehensively lift restrictions on mutual exchanges, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman said Tuesday. -0-

    Source: Xinhua

    China and the European Parliament have decided to lift restrictions on mutual exchanges, says Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman China and the European Parliament have decided to lift restrictions on mutual exchanges, says Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Iceland: Staff Concluding Statement of the 2025 Article IV Mission

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    May 6, 2025

    A Concluding Statement describes the preliminary findings of IMF staff at the end of an official staff visit (or ‘mission’), in most cases to a member country. Missions are undertaken as part of regular (usually annual) consultations under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, in the context of a request to use IMF resources (borrow from the IMF), as part of discussions of staff monitored programs, or as part of other staff monitoring of economic developments.

    The authorities have consented to the publication of this statement. The views expressed in this statement are those of the IMF staff and do not necessarily represent the views of the IMF’s Executive Board. Based on the preliminary findings of this mission, staff will prepare a report that, subject to management approval, will be presented to the IMF Executive Board for discussion and decision.

    Washington, DC: An International Monetary Fund mission, led by Magnus Saxegaard and comprising Thomas Gade, Amit Kara, and Yurii Sholomytskyi, conducted discussions for the 2024 Article IV consultation with Iceland virtually during April 7-11, 2025, and in Reykjavik, Iceland, during April 28 to May 5, 2025. At the conclusion of the visit, the mission issued the following statement:

    A successful tightening of macroeconomic policies has slowed the economy and reduced imbalances accumulated after the pandemic. The challenges now are to fully return inflation back to target while ensuring a soft landing for the economy; to build resilience by gradually increasing fiscal buffers; and to strengthen productivity and further diversify the economy to support medium-term growth and reduce Iceland’s vulnerability to shocks.

    The economy slowed sharply in 2024, but growth is expected to pick up in 2025 and medium-term prospects remain favorable. Growth slowed to 0.5 percent in 2024 (from 5.6 percent in 2023) due largely to idiosyncratic factors (e.g., a disappointing fishing season and constraints on energy supply) that reduced exports, as well as subdued consumption growth. Growth is expected to rise to 1.8 percent in 2025 and 2.4 percent in 2026 supported by a recovery in exports, higher real wages, and continued monetary easing. The direct impact of escalating global trade tensions is projected to be limited given that most goods exports are destined for Europe; this projection assumes that the pharmaceutical sector, which is more reliant on the US market, remains exempt from tariffs. However, Iceland will be indirectly affected by lower growth in its trading partners. Inflation is projected to remain sticky due to elevated inflation expectations and still high wage growth, declining gradually to the Central Bank of Iceland’s (CBI’s) 2.5 percent inflation target in the second half of 2026. The medium-term growth outlook is positive, with the expansion of higher value-added export-oriented sectors expected to boost productivity growth, and migrant labor inflows facilitating a modest increase in employment.

    Risks to growth are tilted to the downside while risks to inflation are broadly balanced. The impact of rising trade tensions could be larger than projected if US tariffs are extended to pharmaceuticals products, or if Iceland is affected by potential EU retaliation. Also, a reduction in the number of tourists travelling to and from the US could negatively impact tourism. Inflation could rise if trade tensions trigger supply chain disruptions or capital flight weakens the exchange rate. Conversely, capital inflows could put upward pressure on the exchange rate and weaken competitiveness. On the domestic side, attacks on physical or digital infrastructure could disrupt payment flows and thus economic activity and financial stability. A continuation of recent years’ dry weather could curtail energy supply and weaken exports. Second-round effects from higher wage growth could keep inflation elevated, while a premature loosening of monetary policy could further de-anchor inflation expectations. Upside risk include a reduction in household savings that would bolster consumption, and a faster-than-anticipated expansion of activity in pharmaceuticals and aquaculture.

    Fiscal Policy: Building Buffers to Bolster Resilience

    The authorities’ fiscal targets are suitably ambitious. The Medium-Term Fiscal Strategy (MTFS) projects a general government deficit this year of 1.3 percent of GDP, close to staff’s projection of 1.2 percent of GDP and down from 3.5 percent of GDP in 2024. The resulting 0.6 percentage point contractionary fiscal impulse is appropriate given still elevated inflation. The authorities’ medium-term fiscal targets, which entail turning the fiscal deficit into a surplus by 2028, are suitably ambitious considering that Iceland’s public indebtedness is higher than that of most Nordic countries despite the economy being more shock prone.

    The consolidation measures in the MTFS will help the authorities achieve their fiscal targets. Staff welcomes that this year’s MTFS identifies all fiscal measures planned by the authorities to achieve their medium-term fiscal targets; this significantly increases the credibility of the consolidation. Measures appropriately include a combination of expenditure reductions (e.g., streamlining operations and merging of institutions) and revenue measures (e.g., expanding kilometer-based taxation to all vehicles and increasing natural resource rent taxation on tourism and fisheries). Staff projections that only include measures that have been presented to Parliament in a legislative proposal, indicate that about 0.5 percent of GDP in additional measures will be needed over the next five years to meet the authorities’ targets. The measures outlined in the MTFS would cover this gap, but additional fiscal effort could be necessary if spending increases more than anticipated or if the yield from revenue measures falls short of expectations (see below).

    Increasing infrastructure spending while safeguarding fiscal sustainability would bolster Iceland’s growth prospects. The government’s intention to scale up public investment is welcome given infrastructure gaps in transport and energy. However, the MTFS projects a medium-term decline in government investment as a share of GDP compared to recent years. Staff recommends to, at a minimum, maintain the current level of government investment within the MTFS deficit targets. As noted in the MTFS, identifying opportunities for Iceland’s pension funds to scale up their financing of infrastructure in a manner consistent with their fiduciary duties could help complement these efforts, though care should be taken to contain any increase in fiscal risks. Partnering with multilateral investment banks or international infrastructure funds could provide useful expertise with private financing of infrastructure projects. Streamlining permitting and licensing procedures would help speed up infrastructure deployment.

    Additional fiscal effort could be required if planned measures fall short of expectations, or to scale up government investment. In such a scenario, the authorities could consider: (i) increasing the preferential VAT rate and/or limiting the items that benefit from it; (ii) increasing housing taxation (see below); (iii) streamlining R&D incentives including by reassessing the 2020 increase in the ceiling on eligible business R&D expenditure (see below); and (iv) carrying out a comprehensive review of public expenditure to identify potential savings.

    Activation of revised fiscal rules in 2026 is welcome; however, their credibility would be enhanced by strengthening the Fiscal Council.

    • The revised fiscal framework—which broadly aligns with staff’s recommendations in the 2024 Article IV—includes a net expenditure growth rule instead of the previous budget balance rule. It preserves the 30 percent of GDP net debt ceiling though the speed at which this is to be achieved will be more flexible than in the past. The revised framework will allow the authorities to factor in the state of the economy in their consolidation plans and reduce procyclicality.
    • The Fiscal Council, which will be responsible for monitoring compliance with the fiscal rules, should be tasked with evaluating the macroeconomic and fiscal projections underpinning the MTFS. The intention is also that the Council will be responsible for monitoring productivity developments and for making proposals for reforms. This would require a significant increase in the capacity and resources of the Fiscal Council.
    • To bolster transparency and enable the Fiscal Council to monitor fiscal developments and compliance with the fiscal rules on an ongoing basis, the authorities should start publishing fiscal data corresponding to the coverage of the fiscal rules on a quarterly rather than annual basis as is currently the case, and ensure that these data are independently verifiable. Expanding the coverage of the budget and the fiscal rules to encompass the entirety of the central government would facilitate these efforts. This would also reduce incentives to shift spending and borrowing to parts of the government not covered by the fiscal rules.

    Monetary Policy: Calibrating the Pace of Monetary Easing

    As inflation declines toward the target, the policy rate should be reduced. The current monetary stance is appropriately tight given still elevated inflation and inflation expectations. Staff’s inflation forecast, which envisions reaching the 2.5 percent target in the second half of 2026, is in the IMF’s view consistent with a 250 basis points reduction in the policy rate over the next 4–5 quarters. This policy trajectory, which maintains a tight policy stance (but progressively less so) until inflation expectations become reanchored to the inflation target, would balance the trade-offs between bringing inflation sustainably to target and the risk to the economy from an overly restrictive policy stance. Persistent wage increases above productivity growth or a rise in imported inflation would warrant a more gradual easing of the monetary policy stance, while indications that inflation is likely to undershoot the target on a sustained basis would call for a more rapid reduction in the policy rate. The current elevated uncertainty suggests the pace of monetary easing should be guided more than usual by incoming data. As uncertainty declines the CBI should transition to a more forecast-based inflation targeting environment to increase predictability and reduce financial market volatility.

    The CBI’s decision to commence regular purchases of foreign exchange is opportune given current favorable market conditions and will strengthen its ability to stabilize the foreign exchange market during times of stress. The purchase program, which will be revised as conditions warrant, will help offset a projected decline in reserve coverage over the next two years. Staff agree that, given the current uncertain external environment and the shock prone nature of the economy, it is prudent to maintain a level of reserves well above the lower end of the 100-150 percent of the Fund’s Reserve Adequacy (ARA) range. As noted in the 2024 Article IV consultation, the authorities should also explore options to gradually deepen the foreign currency derivatives market when conditions allow, to encourage greater participation of foreign investors in the domestic bond market and to facilitate hedging of foreign currency risk.

    Financial Sector: Maintaining a Robust Financial System

    The banking system remains resilient and systemic risks are contained, but pockets of vulnerabilities remain that require continued vigilance. Financial institutions are well capitalized and have ample liquidity buffers, while non-performing loans remain low compared to their pre-pandemic average. The financial cycle has decelerated but remains somewhat elevated, while the CBI’s domestic systemic risk indicator has increased slightly although it is below its long-term average. These indicators suggest risks are primarily concentrated in the housing market. An abrupt fall in house prices combined with higher-for-longer interest rates and an economic slowdown could result in a deterioration in asset quality. Risks are partially mitigated by conservative loan-to-value ratios and the strong equity position of most borrowers. Corporate credit risk has increased modestly, including in the hospitality sector, and could rise further if rising trading tensions trigger a decline in tourist arrivals. Meanwhile, cybersecurity threats are an increasing concern, and staff welcomes the authorities’ efforts to enhance operational security and enhance the resilience of the domestic payment system.

    The current macroprudential stance is broadly appropriate, though there may be scope for some easing if financial conditions improve as anticipated. Overall capital requirements on Icelandic banks are relatively high compared to other European countries, bolstering banks’ resilience in a shock prone economy. While these requirements are broadly appropriate given still elevated risks in the housing market, there may be scope for some easing if systemic risks recede. It would be prudent to defer such a decision until the impact of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) III—expected to take effect by mid-2025—is clear. Any easing of the macroprudential stance should take care to safeguard the availability of releasable capital under the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB). Borrower-based measures (BBMs) have contributed to contain household credit risk and should remain on hold for now. The government’s plans to reduce the prevalence of CPI-indexed mortgage loans should be carefully timed given the beneficial impact indexation has had on borrower resilience and financial stability.

    Sustaining the momentum in implementing Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) recommendations will require continued efforts. Staff welcomes the significant progress achieved in implementing the recommendations from the 2023 FSAP. Since the 2024 Article IV, progress has been made on operationalizing an Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA) framework, while efforts are ongoing with technical assistance from the Fund to enhance AML/CFT supervision of banks. Steps have been taken to strengthen the supervision of pension funds, but more progress is needed on legislative changes to enhance pension fund governance, internal risk controls, and risk management. Focusing on incremental changes rather than comprehensive reforms may facilitate progress moving forward. Further steps are also needed to safeguard the independence and effectiveness of the CBI’s supervisory activities, including through a streamlined and independent budgetary process for financial supervision and improved legal protection for supervisors. Lastly, efforts should continue to strengthen the CBI’s and the financial sector’s operational risk management capacity.

    Structural Policies to Boost Productivity and Diversify the Economy

    Investments in physical and human capital, along with continued efforts to promote innovation and improve allocative efficiency are needed to sustain productivity growth.

    • While the level of labor productivity is high, productivity growth has slowed since the global financial crisis due to lower total factor productivity (TFP) growth and decreasing capital intensity. Staff analysis suggests this is largely the result of a lower share of jobs in high productivity sectors (likely due to the financial sector shrinking to more sustainable levels and the expansion of the tourism sector) rather than a decline in within-sector productivity growth. Meanwhile, the share of fast-growing firms that can drive economy-wide productivity gains is below the EU average.
    • The authorities’ ambition to increase productivity growth is welcome. To achieve this they should: (i) focus on improving infrastructure to facilitate firms’ access to domestic and international markets; (ii) continue their efforts to promote innovation and the creation of more high-growth businesses; (iii) work with stakeholders in the labor market to strengthen incentives for pursuing higher education in fields where there is a shortage of skills; and (iv) streamline professional licensing requirements for foreign nationals.

    Incentives to promote innovation and diversification of the economy are bearing fruit, but there is scope to improve the efficiency of R&D support schemes. Generous tax incentives have made Iceland one of the most attractive jurisdictions in the OECD for R&D investment and contributed to the emergence of several fast-growing innovative firms. However, the sharp increase in public R&D spending has raised concerns about budgetary costs and efficiency. Plans to revise the R&D legislation provide an opportunity to clarify eligibility criteria and thus increase the predictability of the scheme. Also, as noted previously, there may be merit in reassessing the 2020 increase in the ceilings on eligible business R&D expenditures given that it primarily benefits medium and large firms where research suggests R&D support has less impact. Allowing businesses to deduct R&D expenses from payroll taxes could bolster the impact of the scheme given evidence that payroll tax offsets have a greater impact on firms’ R&D tax expenditure. This would also reduce administrative costs by eliminating the need for refunds to loss-making companies.

    Integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) could bolster productivity growth. Iceland’s strong digital infrastructure, relatively high levels of human capital, and robust legal framework suggest that it is well placed to benefit from AI. Staff analysis indicates that the proportion of jobs that are well positioned to take advantage of productivity gains from AI is higher than in other advanced economies. Conversely, the share of jobs at risk of displacement from AI is smaller, though still significant. To mitigate potential disruptions to the labor market the authorities should provide opportunities for re-skilling and scale up active labor market policies to facilitate the movement of workers between sectors and provide support to the most vulnerable.

    Further efforts are needed to develop a housing strategy that meets the needs of Iceland’s growing population. The government’s plans to tighten control over short-term rentals and increase the supply of housing could help improve housing affordability. Targeted homeowner assistance programs can play a complementary role, though such programs would need to be designed in a way that minimizes fiscal risks and risks to macroeconomic and financial stability. Housing taxation can also play a supportive role in reducing housing market imbalances. For instance, increasing capital gains taxation on secondary homes and investment properties and raising the tax rate on vacant lots in urban areas could not only raise revenue but also play a supportive role in curbing speculative demand and incentivizing supply.

    The IMF team would like to thank the authorities and other interlocutors for their generous hospitality and constructive dialogue.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Boris Balabanov

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/05/05/mcs-iceland-staff-concluding-statement-of-the-2025-article-iv-mission

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: GUU and Rostransnadzor outlined vectors of cooperation

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: State University of Management – Official website of the State –

    On May 5, 2025, a working meeting was held at the State University of Management between the university management and a delegation from the Federal Service for Supervision of Transport (Rostransnadzor), where the main vectors of cooperation were discussed.

    GUU was represented by Rector Vladimir Stroyev and Vice-Rector Maria Karelina, as well as young scientists of the university. The delegation of Rostransnadzor was headed by Acting Head Viktor Gulin.

    Vladimir Stroyev began the conversation by telling us that the State University of Management initially had a well-developed transport education, and recently it has received a new impetus for development. The university has produced many famous graduates, including Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Dmitry Patrushev, who studied transport management. And Vice-Rector Maria Karelina, who was present at the meeting, is the head of the Department of Transport Complex Management, and previously worked for a long time at MADI.

    “Many people perceive GUU exclusively as a management university, but in fact it is much more multidisciplinary. We have an inter-university design bureau, which recently won the first competition of student design bureaus, and we are developing unmanned aerial vehicles and agricultural projects. We have an excellent logistics school. We literally just met with partners from the Moscow City Economy Complex Management Center on this matter. It’s high time for us to start interacting,” said Vladimir Stroyev.

    Acting head of Rostransnadzor Viktor Gulin agreed with this, especially since the agreement on cooperation in the area of personnel training has already been developed by lawyers.

    “We have 8 interregional departments for all types of transport, as well as transport safety, 4,000 employees for the entire country. Rostransnadzor has been assigned many new functions, so we need to train competent specialists who know how to manage people, we need a personnel reserve. Our experienced employees are reluctant to move to management positions because they do not understand the specifics of management. With the help of the State University of Management, we want to retrain them,” Viktor Gulin outlined the task.

    Vladimir Stroyev agreed that enterprises currently lack qualified managers. The generation trained by the Soviet education system has passed away, and the new generation studied according to Western standards or even abroad; they have no contact with workers or understanding of the nuances of industry management.

    Vice-Rector of the State University of Management Maria Karelina spoke about cooperation with TMH Engineering and suggested quickly adapting one of the ready-made projects to the needs of Rostransnadzor in order to present it to the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation by the end of May, where one of the State University of Management graduates Andrey Nikitin has recently been working. And by the next academic year, to thoroughly prepare their own project.

    The Head of the Department for Coordination of Scientific Research at the State University of Management, Maxim Pletnev, confirmed that the preliminary agreements took into account cooperation in two main areas – education and the development of unmanned vehicles.

    Vladimir Stroyev explained to the guests why it is important to start working together as soon as possible. While the period of higher education reform is ongoing, it is possible to test your programs and offer them to the Ministry of Science and Higher Education as standard ones.

    Viktor Gulin expressed his readiness to submit a joint project to government grant competitions.

    Maria Karelina noted that it would not be a bad idea to look for other partners in order to expand the resource and scientific potential of the project.

    Vladimir Stroyev shared the observation that even large state universities today cannot independently implement modern high-tech and science-intensive projects at the proper level. “We inevitably come to the point that we need to create cooperation networks,” the rector summed up.

    Summing up the meeting, the partners agreed to exchange proposals for cooperation in the development and use of unmanned vehicles, and it was decided to sign an agreement on cooperation in the field of personnel training at the St. Petersburg Economic Forum.

    Subscribe to the TG channel “Our GUU” Date of publication: 05/06/2025

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: DBS produce new video explaining the online ‘request a Basic DBS check’ service

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    News story

    DBS produce new video explaining the online ‘request a Basic DBS check’ service

    DBS have created a new explainer animation video, about the online ‘request a Basic DBS check’ function.

    The Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) has launched a new video for organisations, aiming to raise awareness of the online ‘request a Basic DBS check’ service, and the many benefits it provides.

    The video explains the benefits of including Basic checks in the recruitment process, as well as the many advantages of using the online Basic DBS check service to facilitate these checks within your organisation.

    The short video explains:

    • what Basic checks are, and what information they show
    • the benefits of using Basic checks in the recruitment process
    • the benefits of using the online Basic check application route

    You can watch the video below to learn more:

    Basic DBS checks and your organisation

    To access the Basic Digital Service, as shown in the above video, visit www.gov.uk/request-copy-criminal-record.

    Updates to this page

    Published 6 May 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: 5 May 2025 Building Resilience Through Preparedness: Scaling Up Mental Health and Psychosocial Support in Bangladesh

    Source: World Health Organisation

    From 2–4 December, WHO and UNHCR co-organized a three-day inter-agency workshop in Cox’s Bazar focused on operationalizing MHPSS preparedness as part of disaster risk management. This workshop was part of broader efforts under the WHO Special Initiative for Mental Health (SIMH) to expand sustainable mental health services in Bangladesh. More than 50 participants from across government and the humanitarian and development sectors joined the workshop. The MHPSS Ready training package aims to strengthen the capacity to manage risks to mental health and ensure timely and effective mental health and psychosocial support before, during and after emergencies. 

    To further support implementation, WHO and partners piloted the forthcoming MHPSS Preparedness Assessment Toolkit, using the toolkit’s capacity checklist to assess MHPSS readiness in SIMH-supported districts and in Cox’s Bazar refugee camps. To further assess readiness, two community risks and capacities focus group discussions were held in Cox’s Bazar to gather feedback from adults living in the refugee camps. Visits to health centres and community discussions further enriched findings, with more district-level assessments planned for 2025.

    Building on these activities,, a national stakeholder workshop on MHPSS preparedness was also held on 10 December in Dhaka. The workshop brought together representatives from the National Institute of Mental Health, NGOs, and UN agencies to define key challenges and next steps. Among the priorities identified were expanding community-based mental health systems, strengthening multisectoral coordination, and embedding MHPSS within national emergency and disaster management planning and structures.

    These initial steps mark important progress in strengthening MHPSS preparedness in Bangladesh. Through investment in coordination, capacity, and data, the country is moving toward more resilient systems. Strengthening MHPSS is  essential to protecting population well-being during emergencies, and boosting universal health coverage

    For more information, please contact Hasina Momotaz (momotazh@who.int) and Dr Brandon Gray (grayb@who.int

    “,”datePublished”:”2025-05-05T15:39:15.0000000+00:00″,”image”:”https://cdn.who.int/media/images/default-source/mental-health-and-substance-abuse/special-initiative-on-mental-health/mhpss-training.jpg?sfvrsn=ef7e5dfe_3″,”publisher”:{“@type”:”Organization”,”name”:”World Health Organization: WHO”,”logo”:{“@type”:”ImageObject”,”url”:”https://www.who.int/Images/SchemaOrg/schemaOrgLogo.jpg”,”width”:250,”height”:60}},”dateModified”:”2025-05-05T15:39:15.0000000+00:00″,”mainEntityOfPage”:”https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/building-resilience-through-preparedness–scaling-up-mental-health-and-psychosocial-support-in-bangladesh”,”@context”:”http://schema.org”,”@type”:”Article”};
    ]]>

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: President Lai meets Japanese Diet Member and former Minister of Economy, Trade, and Industry Nishimura Yasutoshi

    Source: Republic of China Taiwan

    Details
    2025-05-02
    President Lai meets Atlantic Council delegation
    On the afternoon of May 2, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation from the Atlantic Council, a think tank based in Washington, DC. In remarks, President Lai said that we have already proposed a roadmap for deepening Taiwan-US trade ties to achieve a common objective of reducing all bilateral tariffs. At the same time, the president said, we will expand investments across the United States and create win-win outcomes for both sides through the trade and economic strategy of “Taiwan plus the US.” The president also emphasized that Taiwan is not only a bastion of freedom and democracy, but also an indispensable hub for global supply chains. He expressed hope that, given shared economic and security interests, Taiwan and the US will generate even greater synergy and prove to be each other’s strongest support. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: I welcome you all to Taiwan. In particular, Vice President Matthew Kroenig visited Taiwan last June and now is making another trip less than a year later. He also contributed an important article supporting Taiwan to a major international publication, highlighting the concern that our international friends have for Taiwan. We are truly moved and thankful. On behalf of the people of Taiwan, I sincerely thank all sectors of the US for their longstanding and steadfast support for Taiwan. Especially, as we face the challenges arising from the regional situation, we hope to continue deepening the Taiwan-US partnership. Holding a key position on the first island chain, Taiwan faces military threats and gray-zone aggression from China. We will continue to show our unwavering determination to defend ourselves. I want to emphasize that Taiwan is accelerating efforts to enhance its overall defense capabilities. The government will also prioritize special budget allocations to increase Taiwan’s defense spending from 2.5 percent of GDP to more than 3 percent. This reflects the efforts we are putting into safeguarding our nation and demonstrates our determination to safeguard regional peace and stability. During President Donald Trump’s first term, Taiwan purchased 66 new F-16V fighter jets. The first of these rolled off the assembly line in South Carolina at the end of this March. This is crucial for Taiwan’s strategy of achieving peace through strength. In the future, we will continue to procure defense equipment from the US that helps ensure peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. We also look forward to bilateral security collaboration evolving beyond arms sales to a partnership that encompasses joint research and development and joint manufacturing, further strengthening our cooperation and exchanges. Taiwan firmly believes in fair, free, and mutually beneficial trade ties. Indeed, we have already proposed a roadmap for deepening Taiwan-US trade ties. This includes our common objective of reducing all bilateral tariffs as well as narrowing the trade imbalance through the procurement of energy and agricultural and other industrial products from the US. At the same time, we will expand investments across the US. We will promote our “Taiwan plus one” policy, that is, the new trade and economic strategy of “Taiwan plus the US,” to build non-red supply chains and create win-win outcomes for both sides. As the US is moving to reindustrialize its manufacturing industry and may hope to become a global manufacturing center for AI, Taiwan is willing to join in the efforts. Taiwan is not only a bastion of freedom and democracy, but also an indispensable hub for global supply chains. We have every confidence that, given shared Taiwan-US economic and security interests, we can generate even greater synergy and prove to be each other’s strongest support. In closing, I thank Vice President Kroenig once again for leading this delegation, demonstrating support for Taiwan. I look forward to exchanging opinions with you all in just a few moments. I wish you a smooth and successful trip. Vice President Kroenig then delivered remarks, first thanking President Lai for hosting them. He said that it is an honor to be here and to lead a delegation from the Atlanta Council, which consists of a mix of former senior US government officials with responsibility for Taiwan and also rising stars visiting Taiwan for the first time. Vice President Kroenig said that they are here at a critical moment, as there is an ongoing war in Europe, multiple conflicts in the Middle East, and increased Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific. Moreover, he pointed out, the regimes of China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea are increasingly working together in a new axis of aggressors. Vice President Kroenig indicated that the challenge facing the US and its allies and partners, including Taiwan, is how to deter these autocracies and maintain global peace, prosperity, and freedom, especially in Taiwan, whose security and stability matter, not only for Taiwan, but also for the US and the world. Vice President Kroenig assured President Lai and the people of Taiwan that the US is a reliable partner for Taiwan. The vice president stated that the administration under President Trump is prioritizing the deterrence of China, and that President Trump has announced an intention to have the largest US defense budget in history, more than US$1 trillion, to resource this priority. Pointing out that an America-first president will not help a country that is not helping itself, Vice President Kroenig said that their delegation has been impressed with the steps President Lai and the administration are taking to strengthen Taiwan’s security, including increasing defense spending, developing a societal resilience strategy, and using cutting edge technologies like unmanned systems to promote indigenous defense production. Vice President Kroenig said that more than money and equipment are necessary to secure a democracy against a powerful and ruthless neighbor, adding that history shows that the human factor is the most important. In the end, he said, it will be the will of the people of Taiwan to resist coercion and to defend their home which will be the most important factor determining the future fate of Taiwan and for the ability of the people of Taiwan to chart their own destiny. Vice President Kroenig emphasized that Americans are willing to support Taiwan in this endeavor, but it will be the people of Taiwan and strong and capable leaders like President Lai at the forefront of this struggle, with the firm support of America. Vice President Kroenig said that as the US and Taiwan work together on these challenges, the Atlantic Council looks forward to offering support behind the scenes. Founded in 1961 to support the Transatlantic Alliance, he said, the Atlantic Council is a global think tank, and part of its DNA is working closely with friends and allies in the Indo-Pacific, including Taiwan. He said they look forward to continuing their close and longstanding cooperation with Taiwan through visiting delegations, research and reports, and public and private events. In closing, Vice President Kroenig thanked President Lai again for hosting them and for the work he is doing to secure the free world. The delegation also included former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for East Asia Heino Klinck and former Director for Taiwan Affairs at the White House National Security Council Marvin Park.

    Details
    2025-05-01
    President Lai meets Japan’s LDP Youth Division delegation
    On the morning of May 1, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation from Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) Youth Division. In remarks, President Lai thanked the guests for demonstrating support for deepening Taiwan-Japan ties through concrete actions. The president expressed hope that Taiwan and Japan can continue to conduct exchanges in such areas as national defense, the economy, education, culture, sports, and the arts so that bilateral relations reach even greater heights. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: I want to welcome our distinguished guests, who include Diet members in the LDP Youth Division and guests from Junior Chamber International (JCI) Japan, to the Presidential Office. It is also a pleasure to see LDP Youth Division Director Nakasone Yasutaka, House of Representatives Member Hiranuma Shojiro, and House of Councillors Member Kamiya Masayuki again today. I look forward to discussions with all our distinguished guests. The LDP Youth Division and JCI Japan have once again demonstrated support for deepening Taiwan-Japan ties through concrete actions. On behalf of the people of Taiwan, I also want to thank the LDP Youth Division for launching a fundraising campaign to help those affected by the earthquake in Hualien County on April 3 last year. LDP Youth Division members will be important leaders in Japan’s political arena in the future. Taiwan deeply values our exchanges with the Youth Division and hopes to bring about concrete results from such exchanges. Peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait are critical to the security and prosperity of the world, and Taiwan and Japan can work together to promote peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. Former Prime Ministers Abe Shinzo and Kishida Fumio, and current Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru have repeatedly stressed the importance of peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait at important international venues. Taiwan is deeply grateful to Japan’s current and former prime ministers for their concern and support for this issue. Taiwan and Japan can also cooperate in industry and the economy. As our industries are complementary, further cooperation can create win-win outcomes. In the semiconductor industry, for instance, Taiwan’s strengths lie in manufacturing, while Japan’s strengths lie in materials, equipment, and technology. If we work together, the semiconductor industry is sure to see even more robust development. In addition to the economy and national defense, Taiwan and Japan can also conduct exchanges in such areas as education, culture, sports, and the arts. Our countries have long shared deep ties – Director Nakasone’s grandfather, former Prime Minister Nakasone Yasuhiro, was stationed in Taiwan and lived in what is now the Mingde New Residential Quarter of Kaohsiung City’s Zuoying District. I am confident that on the basis of our already solid foundations, Taiwan-Japan relations can reach even greater heights. Director Nakasone then delivered remarks, first thanking President Lai for finding time in his busy schedule to meet with the visiting delegation. He said that the LDP Youth Division sends a visiting delegation to Taiwan each year and is always granted the opportunity to meet with the president, demonstrating his high regard for the delegation, for which the director again expressed his gratitude. He remarked that he, together with House of Representatives Member Suzuki Keisuke, visited Taiwan last July, and that whenever he visits Taiwan, it feels as if he is returning home. Director Nakasone recalled President Lai’s earlier remarks, saying that he hopes the young people of Taiwan and Japan can fully engage in exchanges in the areas of national defense, the economy, culture, education, and the arts. The director said he believes that in today’s complex and difficult international situation, such directives are necessary. This is especially so, he emphasized, during United States President Donald Trump’s second term, when things once taken for granted are no longer so, and when the global economy is undergoing significant changes. Director Nakasone expressed his full support for strengthening Taiwan and Japan’s practical and strategic cooperation. He said he believes each side will be able to benefit from such cooperation and hopes that exchanges will progress toward shared goals. He pointed out that, as maritime nations, Taiwan and Japan share the goals of protecting the ocean and using marine resources wisely, goals that we ought to cooperate on and devote our full efforts to. The peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait are critical to the peace and stability of East Asia and even the world, he said, so we must ensure that the world and its leaders recognize this point, and Japan will do its utmost to advocate for it. Director Nakasone said, on the topic of semiconductors, that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company’s new fab in Japan’s Kumamoto Prefecture has made the area very lively, adding that the Japanese government is providing more than 1.25 trillion yen in subsidies. Moving forward, the Japanese government plans to inject an additional 10 trillion yen, he said, to aid in the development of AI and other fields. Noting that Taiwan and Japan both excel in semiconductors, he expressed his hope that each can give free rein to its strengths to produce an even greater effect. Director Nakasone said that despite Taiwan’s facing formidable internal and external circumstances, it saw 4.6 percent economic growth last year under President Lai’s strong leadership, and it continued to promote measures to enhance overall societal resilience, all of which is admirable. In closing, the director thanked President Lai once again for taking the time to meet with them. Also in attendance were Japanese House of Representatives Members Nemoto Taku and Fukuda Kaoru, and Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Taipei Office Chief Representative Katayama Kazuyuki.

    Details
    2025-04-29
    President Lai meets NBR delegation  
    On the morning of April 29, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation from the National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR). In remarks, President Lai stated that as Taiwan stands at the very frontline of defense of global democracy, we are actively implementing our Four Pillars of Peace action plan, which includes continuing to enhance our national defense capabilities, demonstrating our commitment to defending freedom and democracy. The president said he hopes to further advance national security and industrial cooperation between Taiwan and the United States. He also expressed hope that this will help boost economic resilience for both sides and establish each as a key pillar of regional security, elevating our relations to even higher levels. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: I am delighted to meet with Admiral John Aquilino again today. I also warmly welcome NBR President Michael Wills and our distinguished guests from the bureau to Taiwan. I look forward to exchanging views with you all on Taiwan-US relations and the regional situation. During his tenure as commander of the US Indo-Pacific Command, Admiral Aquilino placed much attention on the Taiwan Strait issue. And the NBR has conducted a wealth of research and analysis focusing on matters of regional security. Thanks to all of your outstanding contributions and efforts, the international community has gained a better understanding of the role Taiwan plays in the Indo-Pacific region and in global democratic development. For this, I want to extend my deepest gratitude. Taiwan stands at the very frontline of defending global democracy and is located at a strategically important location in the first island chain. We are actively implementing our Four Pillars of Peace action plan, which includes continuing to enhance our national defense capabilities, building economic security, demonstrating stable and principled cross-strait leadership, and standing side-by-side with the democratic community to jointly demonstrate the strength of deterrence and safeguard regional peace and stability. At the beginning of this month, I announced an increase in military allowances for volunteer service members and combat troops. The government will also continue to reform national defense and enhance self-sufficiency in defense. In addition, we will prioritize special budget allocations to ensure that Taiwan’s defense budget exceeds 3 percent of GDP. These efforts continue to strengthen Taiwan’s self-defense capabilities and demonstrate our commitment to defending freedom and democracy. As we mark the 46th anniversary of the enactment of the Taiwan Relations Act, we thank the US government for continuing its arms sales to Taiwan and strengthening the Taiwan-US partnership over the years. We believe that, in addition to engaging in military exchanges and cooperation, Taiwan and the US can build an even closer economic and trade relationship, boosting each other’s economic resilience and establishing each as a key pillar of regional security. I expect that your continued assistance will help advance national security and industrial cooperation between Taiwan and the US, elevating our relations to even higher levels. Once again, I welcome our distinguished guests to Taiwan and wish you a pleasant and successful trip. I hope that through this visit, you gain a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding of Taiwan’s economy and national defense. Admiral Aquilino then delivered remarks, thanking the Ministry of National Defense for the invitation and President Lai for receiving and spending time with them. Mentioning that this is his second visit in five months, he said he continues to be incredibly impressed with the president’s leadership and the actions he has taken to secure Taiwan and defend its people. Admiral Aquilino said that he has watched the efforts of the ministers on whole-of-society defense to demonstrate deterrence and added that the pace of the work is nothing short of inspiring. Admiral Aquilino noted that Taiwan’s thriving democracy is incredibly important to the peace and stability of the region. He stated that he, alongside the NBR, will continue to offer support, noting that President Wills and his team are an asset to Taiwan and the US that helps continue our close relationship and ensure peace and stability in the region.  

    Details
    2025-04-28
    President Lai meets Japanese Diet Member and former Minister of State for Economic Security Takaichi Sanae
    On the afternoon of April 28, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation led by Member of the Japanese House of Representatives and former Minister of State for Economic Security Takaichi Sanae. In remarks, President Lai thanked the government of Japan for repeatedly emphasizing the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait at important international venues. The president expressed hope that in the face of China’s continually expanding red supply chains, Taiwan and Japan can continue to cooperate closely in such fields as semiconductors, energy, and AI technology to create non-red supply chains that enhance economic resilience and industrial competitiveness for both sides, and jointly pave the way for further prosperity and growth in the Indo-Pacific region. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: First, I would like to extend a warm welcome to Representative Takaichi as she returns for another visit to Taiwan. I am also very happy to have Members of the House of Representatives Kikawada Hitoshi and Ozaki Masanao, and Member of the House of Councillors Sato Kei all gathered together here to engage in these very important exchanges. Our visitors will be taking part in many exchange activities during this trip. Earlier today at the Indo-Pacific Strategy Thinktank’s International Political and Economic Forum, Representative Takaichi delivered a speech in which she clearly demonstrated the great importance she places upon the friendship between Taiwan and Japan. For this I want to express my deepest appreciation to each of our guests. The peoples of Taiwan and Japan have a deep friendship and mutual trust. We have a shared commitment to the universal values of democracy, freedom, and respect for human rights, but beyond that, we both have striven to contribute to regional peace and stability. I also want to thank the government of Japan for repeatedly emphasizing the importance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait at important international venues. Tomorrow you will all make a trip to Kaohsiung to visit a bronze statue of former Prime Minister Abe Shinzo, who once said, “If Taiwan has a problem, then Japan has a problem.” We will always remember the firm support and friendship he showed Taiwan. Since taking office last year, I have worked hard to improve Taiwan’s whole-of-society defense resilience and implement our Four Pillars of Peace action plan. By strengthening our national defense capabilities, building up economic security, demonstrating stable and principled cross-strait leadership, and deepening partnerships with democratic countries including Japan, we can together maintain peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region and across the Taiwan Strait. At the same time, in the face of China’s continually expanding red supply chains, we hope that Taiwan and Japan, as important economic and trade partners, can continue to cooperate closely in such fields as semiconductors, energy, and AI technology to create non-red supply chains that further enhance economic resilience and industrial competitiveness for both sides. Going forward, Taiwan will work hard to play an important role in the international community and contribute its key strengths. I hope that, with the support of our guests, Taiwan can soon accede to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership and sign an economic partnership agreement (EPA) with Japan so that we can jointly pave the way for further prosperity and growth in the Indo-Pacific region. Lastly, I thank each of you once again for taking concrete action to support Taiwan. I am confident that your visit will help deepen Taiwan-Japan ties and create even greater opportunities for cooperation. Let us all strive together to keep propelling Taiwan-Japan relations forward.  Representative Takaichi then delivered remarks, first thanking President Lai and Taiwanese political leaders for the warm hospitality they extended to the delegation, and mentioning that the visiting delegation members are all like-minded partners carrying on the legacy of former Prime Minister Abe. July 8 this year will mark the third anniversary of the passing of former Prime Minister Abe, she said, and when the former prime minister unfortunately passed away, President Lai, then serving as vice president, was among the first to come offer condolences, for which she expressed sincere admiration and gratitude. Representative Takaichi stated that Taiwan and Japan are island nations that face the same circumstances and problems, and that Japan’s trade activities rely heavily on ocean transport, so once a problem arises nearby that threatens maritime shipping lanes, it will be a matter of life and death for Japan. Taiwan and Japan are similar, as once a problem arises, both will face food and energy security issues, and supply chains may even be threatened, she said. Regarding Taiwan-Japan cooperation, Representative Takaichi stated that both sides must first protect and strengthen supply chain resilience. President Lai has previously said that he wants to turn Taiwan into an AI island, she said, and in semiconductors, Taiwan has the world’s leading technology. Representative Takaichi went on to say that Taiwan and Japan can collaborate in the fields of AI and semiconductors, quantum computing, and dual-use industries, as well as in areas such as drones and new energy technologies to build more resilient supply chains, so that if problems arise, we can maintain our current standard of living with peace of mind. Representative Takaichi indicated that cooperation in the defense sector is also crucial, and that by uniting like-minded countries including Taiwan, the United States, Japan, the Philippines, and Australia, and even countries in Europe, we can build a stronger network to jointly maintain our security guarantees. Representative Takaichi expressed hope that Taiwan and Japan will continue to strengthen substantive non-governmental relations, including personnel exchange visits and information sharing, so that we can jointly face and respond to crises when they arise. Regarding the hope to sign a Taiwan-Japan EPA that President Lai had mentioned earlier, she also expressed support and said she looks forward to upcoming exchanges and talks. The visiting delegation also included Japan-Taiwan Exchange Association Taipei Office Chief Representative Katayama Kazuyuki.

    Details
    2025-04-23
    President Lai delivers remarks at International Holocaust Remembrance Day event
    On the afternoon of April 23, President Lai Ching-te attended an International Holocaust Remembrance Day event and delivered remarks, in which he emphasized that peace is priceless, and war has no winners, while morality, democracy, and respect for human rights are powerful forces against violence and tyranny. The president stated that Taiwan will continue to expand cooperation with democratic partners and safeguard regional and global peace and stability, defending democracy, freedom, and human rights. He said we must never forget history, and must overcome our differences and join in solidarity to ensure that the next generations live in a world that is more just and more peaceful. Upon arriving at the event, President Lai heard a testimony from the granddaughter of a Holocaust survivor, followed by a rabbi’s recitation of the prayer “El Maleh Rachamim.” He then joined other distinguished guests in lighting candles in memory of the victims. A transcript of President Lai’s remarks follows: To begin, I want to thank the Israel Economic and Cultural Office (ISECO) in Taipei, German Institute Taipei, Taiwan Foundation for Democracy, and Ministry of Foreign Affairs for co-organizing this deeply significant memorial ceremony again this year. I also want to thank everyone for attending. We are here today to remember the victims of the Holocaust, express sympathy for the survivors, honor the brave individuals who protected the victims, and acknowledge all who were impacted by this atrocity. It was deeply moving to hear Ms. [Orly] Sela share the story of how her grandmother, Yehudit Biksz, escaped the Nazi regime. I want to thank her specially for traveling so far to attend this event. From the 1930s through World War II, the Nazi regime sought to exclude Jewish people from society. In their campaign, they perpetrated systematic genocide driven by their ideology. Policies and directives under the authoritarian Nazi regime resulted in the deaths of approximately 6 million Jews. Millions of others were persecuted, including Romani people, persons with disabilities, the gay community, and anyone who disagreed with Nazi ideology. It is one of the darkest chapters in human history. Many countries, including Taiwan, have enacted anti-massacre legislation, and observe a remembrance day each year. Those occasions help us remember the victims, preserve historical memory, and most importantly, reinforce our resolve to fight against hatred and discrimination. Twenty-three years ago, Chelujan (車路墘) Church in Tainan founded the Taiwan Holocaust Memorial Museum. It is the first Jewish museum in Taiwan, and the second Holocaust museum in Asia. Its founding mission urges us to forget hatred and love one another; put an end to war and advocate peace. Many of the exhibition items come from Jewish people, connecting Taiwan closer with Israel and helping Taiwanese better understand the experiences of Jewish people. In this way, we grow to more deeply cherish peace. When I was mayor of Tainan, I took part in an exhibition event at Chelujan Church. I was also invited by the Israeli government to join the International Mayors Conference in Israel, where I visited the World Holocaust Remembrance Center. I will never forget how deeply that experience moved me, and as a result, peace and human rights became even more important issues for me. These issues are valued by Taiwan and our friends and allies. They are also important links connecting Taiwan with the world. Peace is priceless, and war has no winners. We will continue to expand cooperation with democratic partners and safeguard regional and global peace and stability. We will also continue to make greater contributions and work with the international community to defend democracy, freedom, and human rights. This year also marks the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II. However, we still see wars raging around the world. We see a resurgence of authoritarian powers, which could severely impact global democracy, peace, and prosperous development. Today’s event allows for more than reflection on the past; it also serves as a warning for the future. We are reminded of the threats that hatred, prejudice, and extremism pose to humanity. But we are also reminded that morality, democracy, and respect for human rights are powerful forces against violence and tyranny. We must never forget history. We must overcome our differences and join in solidarity for a better future. Let’s work together to ensure that the next generations live in a world that is more just and more peaceful. Also in attendance at the event were Member of the Israeli Knesset (parliament) and Taiwan friendship group Chair Boaz Toporovsky, ISECO Representative Maya Yaron, and German Institute Taipei Deputy Director General Andreas Hofem.

    Details
    2025-04-06
    President Lai delivers remarks on US tariff policy response
    On April 6, President Lai Ching-te delivered recorded remarks regarding the impact of the 32 percent tariff that the United States government recently imposed on imports from Taiwan in the name of reciprocity. In his remarks, President Lai explained that the government will adopt five response strategies, including making every effort to improve reciprocal tariff rates through negotiations, adopting a support plan for affected domestic industries, adopting medium- and long-term economic development plans, forming new “Taiwan plus the US” arrangements, and launching industry listening tours. The president emphasized that as we face this latest challenge, the government and civil society will work hand in hand, and expressed hope that all parties, both ruling and opposition, will support the measures that the Executive Yuan will take to open up a broader path for Taiwan’s economy. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: My fellow citizens, good evening. The US government recently announced higher tariffs on countries around the world in the name of reciprocity, including imposing a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan. This is bound to have a major impact on our nation. Various countries have already responded, and some have even adopted retaliatory measures. Tremendous changes in the global economy are expected. Taiwan is an export-led economy, and in facing future challenges there will inevitably be difficulties, so we must proceed carefully to turn danger into safety. During this time, I want to express gratitude to all sectors of society for providing valuable opinions, which the government regards highly, and will use as a reference to make policy decisions.  However, if we calmly and carefully analyze Taiwan’s trade with the US, we find that last year Taiwan’s exports to the US were valued at US$111.4 billion, accounting for 23.4 percent of total export value, with the other 75-plus percent of products sold worldwide to countries other than the US. Of products sold to the US, competitive ICT products and electronic components accounted for 65.4 percent. This shows that Taiwan’s economy does still have considerable resilience. As long as our response strategies are appropriate, and the public and private sectors join forces, we can reduce impacts. Please do not panic. To address the reciprocal tariffs by the US, Taiwan has no plans to adopt retaliatory tariffs. There will be no change in corporate investment commitments to the US, as long as they are consistent with national interests. But we must ensure the US clearly understands Taiwan’s contributions to US economic development. More importantly, we must actively seek to understand changes in the global economic situation, strengthen Taiwan-US industry cooperation, elevate the status of Taiwan industries in global supply chains, and with safeguarding the continued development of Taiwan’s economy as our goal, adopt the following five strategies to respond. Strategy one: Make every effort to improve reciprocal tariff rates through negotiations using the following five methods:  1. Taiwan has already formed a negotiation team led by Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君). The team includes members from the National Security Council, the Office of Trade Negotiations, and relevant Executive Yuan ministries and agencies, as well as academia and industry. Like the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement, negotiations on tariffs can start from Taiwan-US bilateral zero-tariff treatment. 2. To expand purchases from the US and thereby reduce the trade deficit, the Executive Yuan has already completed an inventory regarding large-scale procurement plans for agricultural, industrial, petroleum, and natural gas products, and the Ministry of National Defense has also proposed a military procurement list. All procurement plans will be actively pursued. 3. Expand investments in the US. Taiwan’s cumulative investment in the US already exceeds US$100 billion, creating approximately 400,000 jobs. In the future, in addition to increased investment in the US by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, other industries such as electronics, ICT, petrochemicals, and natural gas can all increase their US investments, deepening Taiwan-US industry cooperation. Taiwan’s government has helped form a “Taiwan investment in the US” team, and hopes that the US will reciprocate by forming a “US investment in Taiwan” team to bring about closer Taiwan-US trade cooperation, jointly creating a future economic golden age.  4. We must eliminate non-tariff barriers to trade. Non-tariff barriers are an indicator by which the US assesses whether a trading partner is trading fairly with the US. Therefore, we will proactively resolve longstanding non-tariff barriers so that negotiations can proceed more smoothly. 5. We must resolve two issues that have been matters of longstanding concern to the US. One regards high-tech export controls, and the other regards illegal transshipment of dumped goods, otherwise referred to as “origin washing.” Strategy two: We must adopt a plan for supporting our industries. For industries that will be affected by the tariffs, and especially traditional industries as well as micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises, we will provide timely and needed support and assistance. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) and his administrative team recently announced a package of 20 specific measures designed to address nine areas. Moving forward, the support we provide to different industries will depend on how they are affected by the tariffs, will take into account the particular features of each industry, and will help each industry innovate, upgrade, and transform. Strategy three: We must adopt medium- and long-term economic development plans. At this point in time, our government must simultaneously adopt new strategies for economic and industrial development. This is also the fundamental path to solutions for future economic challenges. The government will proactively cooperate with friends and allies, develop a diverse range of markets, and achieve closer integration of entities in the upper, middle, and lower reaches of industrial supply chains. This course of action will make Taiwan’s industrial ecosystem more complete, and will help Taiwanese industries upgrade and transform. We must also make good use of the competitive advantages we possess in such areas as semiconductor manufacturing, integrated chip design, ICT, and smart manufacturing to build Taiwan into an AI island, and promote relevant applications for food, clothing, housing, and transportation, as well as military, security and surveillance, next-generation communications, and the medical and health and wellness industries as we advance toward a smarter, more sustainable, and more prosperous new Taiwan. Strategy four: “Taiwan plus one,” i.e., new “Taiwan plus the US” arrangements: While staying firmly rooted in Taiwan, our enterprises are expanding their global presence and marketing worldwide. This has been our national economic development strategy, and the most important aspect is maintaining a solid base here in Taiwan. We absolutely must maintain a solid footing, and cannot allow the present strife to cause us to waver. Therefore, our government will incentivize investments, carry out deregulation, and continue to improve Taiwan’s investment climate by actively resolving problems involving access to water, electricity, land, human resources, and professional talent. This will enable corporations to stay in Taiwan and continue investing here. In addition, we must also help the overseas manufacturing facilities of offshore Taiwanese businesses to make necessary adjustments to support our “Taiwan plus one” policy, in that our national economic development strategy will be adjusted as follows: to stay firmly rooted in Taiwan while expanding our global presence, strengthening US ties, and marketing worldwide. We intend to make use of the new state of supply chains to strengthen cooperation between Taiwanese and US industries, and gain further access to US markets. Strategy five: Launch industry listening tours: All industrial firms, regardless of sector or size, will be affected to some degree once the US reciprocal tariffs go into effect. The administrative teams led by myself and Premier Cho will hear out industry concerns so that we can quickly resolve problems and make sure policies meet actual needs. My fellow citizens, over the past half-century and more, Taiwan has been through two energy crises, the Asian financial crisis, the global financial crisis, and pandemics. We have been able to not only withstand one test after another, but even turn crises into opportunities. The Taiwanese economy has emerged from these crises stronger and more resilient than ever. As we face this latest challenge, the government and civil society will work hand in hand, and I hope that all parties in the legislature, both ruling and opposition, will support the measures that the Executive Yuan will take to open up a broader path for Taiwan’s economy. Let us join together and give it our all. Thank you.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Labour to cut school buses for over 8,000 pupils in South Lanarkshire

    Source: Scottish National Party

    The SNP candidate in the Hamilton, Larkhall & Stonehouse by-election has voiced her to opposition to plans by Labour-run South Lanarkshire Council to only provide free transport to students who live more than 3 miles from their catchment secondary school, rather than the current 2 mile limit.

    The Interim Executive Director of Education Resources has confirmed these plans, starting from August this year, are a £2 million cut “based on a 35% to 40% reduction in the number of eligible pupils.”

    According to 2024 school census data, there were 20,616 secondary pupils in South Lanarkshire in that year. Therefore, this would amount to cutting bus services for as many as 8,246 school children. For pupils from St John Ogilvie High School, for example, 98% will no longer qualify for school bus transport under Labour’s plans – leaving just two eligible pupils.

    The SNP strongly opposes these cuts, with late local MSP Christina McKelvie working tirelessly to improve local transport, saving the crucial X1 bus route.

    Already 91,526 concessionary fare passes have been issued to over-60s and disabled people in South Lanarkshire, and 48,041 passes have been issued to young people under 22.

    Under this SNP Scottish Government, free bus travel for disabled people, over 60s and other qualifying groups remains in safe hands.

    The SNP’s Katy Loudon has vowed to continue “delivering for this community” if elected as the next MSP for Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse on 5th June, saying a vote for her will send a message to Labour that parents are not wanting these Labour cuts.

    Councillor Loudon, a former teacher, said she is appalled to see Labour inflict such sweeping cuts on children and families across this community.

    She added, “Keir Starmer’s first decision in office was to cut vital support for pensioners; and this spring his Labour government cut £5 billion of support to disabled people.

    “Now, in South Lanarkshire, Labour are doing the same, cutting vital services to thousands of families and letting down local children.”

    She described these decisions as “Tory decisions, made by Labour; a party that has lost its way.”

    The SNP on South Lanarkshire council has opposed this decision at every turn, whilst the SNP Scottish Government has been delivering free bus travel for tens of thousands of people across South Lanarkshire.

    Councillor Loudon concluded saying, “The SNP always wants what’s best for Scotland, while Labour are balancing the books on the backs of pensioners, people with disabilities and children, I will always put the people of Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse first.”.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Sky News First Edition with Peter Stefanovic

    Source: Australia’s climate in 2024: 2nd warmest and 8th wettest year on record

    PETER STEFANOVIC, HOST: Joining us live is the Foreign Minister, Penny Wong. Minister, good to see you this morning. Thank you for your time. Before we get into the post-mortem of the election, I’d just like to ask you about this. It’s all about getting the remaining hostages that Hamas still has. What’s your response to this move?

    PENNY WONG, FOREIGN MINISTER: Well, first, my principled response is Australia continues to call for a ceasefire. We want to see the hostages returned and we want to see humanitarian aid delivered. The humanitarian situation in Gaza is catastrophic. No aid has gone in for weeks. So, we will continue to call on all parties – ceasefire, hostage returns and humanitarian aid to be delivered.

    STEFANOVIC: Do you think the election result justified your stance on Israel and Gaza?

    FOREIGN MINISTER: Look, I don’t think that was a central issue in the campaign. I think that Australians were very focused on cost of living, were very focused on issues that were relevant to their lives. And I want to say how humbled and grateful we are for the privilege that’s been given to us. We really understand it’s a privilege and a responsibility. And what you will see, Pete, is us working every day for the Australian people, knowing the responsibility we’ve been given.

    STEFANOVIC: On trade, a few items of note from firstly, the US and also the EU today. So, the Prime Minister will reportedly scrap the luxury car tax if the EU opens up its market for our ag exports. Is that a fair trade if it’s true?

    FOREIGN MINISTER: I wanted to say broadly, when we announced our response to tariffs, you will recall, we laid out a set of principles and a set of responses that we would put in place, and one of them was continued trade diversification. Now, we’ve done a lot of work on that. You would have heard me, in the context of having some impediments and some $20 billion worth of trade into China lifted during our term of government, I always say to people, we need to diversify, we need to continue to diversify. That’s part of our economic resilience. And we had another Free Trade Agreement with the United Arab Emirates. We’ve had a lot more engagement economically with Southeast Asia on both investment and trade. But obviously, the EU Free Trade Agreement would be an important part of that trade diversification. So, we will keep working on that because we’re a trading nation. We don’t want to be part of trade barriers because it’s not good for us. It’s an act of economic self-harm. So, of course we’ll engage with the European Union and others.

    STEFANOVIC: And on the US how concerned are you about Donald Trump’s tariffs on foreign-made films hurting our industry here?

    FOREIGN MINISTER: I was just asked this by Karl, in fact, and the point I’d make is we have a lot of collaboration between our film industries. You get Aussie actors in US films. You get US films made here or filmed here. There’s a lot of collaboration in the creative area. So, we hope that President Trump, in the context of his discussions with the studio, will come to see the extent to which Australian and American film industries do work together to the benefit of both countries.

    STEFANOVIC: Ok, let’s get to your thoughts on how the election turned out. Are you expecting many, if at all, frontbench changes?

    FOREIGN MINISTER: Well, that’s a matter for, first, the caucus and the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister has made clear his view about some of the senior leadership and us staying in our roles. But beyond that, the decision will be for caucus and for the Prime Minister about which portfolios he allocates. But my thoughts on the election really are summed up in this: the Liberal Party does not represent middle Australia. We see that in the seat results in the suburbs and cities of this country. Families looked at the Liberal Party and thought, you don’t represent my hopes, my aspirations or reflect my concerns.

    STEFANOVIC: Did Liberal preferences help you win seats from the Greens?

    FOREIGN MINISTER: Well, I have looked at a few seats and, for example, I think Renee Coffey in the seat of Griffiths was ahead of Max Chandler-Mather on primaries. So, we live in a preferential system. But I would say the Labor primary vote was obviously very strong and we really respect and are grateful for the opportunity – the choice of Australians and the opportunity we’ve been given.

    STEFANOVIC: But I suppose when it comes to the Liberal Party and its preferences, you were above the Greens. So, might you have Peter Dutton to thank for that by flipping some of those seats?

    FOREIGN MINISTER: Well, Pete, that’s an interesting take. I think that the majority of the contests in the 150 plus seats around the country, as you know, were between us and the Liberal Party. And out of that, I think out of 88 metropolitan seats they hold, I think it’s nine or 10. And there’s obviously some outstanding. But that really says something about the extent to which the Coalition were rejected by middle Australia. That’s the key issue, not the Greens.

    STEFANOVIC: Ok, just a final note. I mean, there was some scuttlebutt back before the election and you are a young person, but there was still rumour that you might be heading for retirement. Given the size of the win, how does that change your calculations with how much time you want to spend?

    FOREIGN MINISTER: That’s a very good question. Obviously, I made a commitment to serve the whole of this term. But yes, the size of the win, we can genuinely do the work for the Australian people and set the country up for a long-term stable Labor Government. And I’m really privileged to be part of that.

    STEFANOVIC: So at least one term, Penny, then we’ll see.

    FOREIGN MINISTER: At least one term. At least one term.

    STEFANOVIC: Can I also ask, I mean, your comments on potentially resurrecting the Voice, that was seized upon by your opponents, but did you fear that that could derail the Labor campaign?

    FOREIGN MINISTER: Yeah, so, and I know, Sky ran on this a lot and obviously, you never want to give people the opportunity to dial up the conflict during a campaign. But you know what I think it demonstrated? It demonstrated a reflex to have a go on these culture war issues, rather than talk about the issues that really mattered to Australians, which were cost of living, Medicare, health, education. Rather than talk about how we maintain steady leadership in a time of great uncertainty. Most Australians were not where the Liberal Party were on those issues. It was a beat-up. We’ve made clear the Voice is gone. I’ve said that many times. But what’s more important is, I think what is said to Australians is you keep talking about issues and getting aggro and playing the politics of conflict. Actually, I’m worried about, are you going to give me tax cuts? Are you going to make it easy to see a doctor? Are you going to make sure my school is funded? Are you going to make sure you build more houses? I want the 20 per cent reduction in HECS debt and I want fee-free TAFE. That’s where people were, that’s where Australians were, it’s not where the Liberal Party was.

    STEFANOVIC: Ok, I know you’ve got another interview to get to, but thank you so much for your time.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: Best Online Casinos Canada | Experts Name 7Bit Casino as the #1 Choice

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    WINNIPEG, Manitoba, May 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — We checked out several crypto casinos in Canada, but most didn’t live up to the hype. The bonuses were weak, the game libraries were limited, and the overall experience felt lacking.

    That’s when we took a tip from some of the best local casino players in Canada, who recommended 7Bit Casino, and they were right. The sign-up process was seamless, the welcome bonus was generous, and crypto withdrawals were lightning-fast. With an extensive game selection and smooth performance, 7Bit Casino truly stands out as a top-tier choice for Canadian players.

    ✔️CLAIM YOUR WELCOME BONUS AND PLAY 8,000+ GAMES AT 7Bit

    Understand the Best Online Casinos Canada: 7Bit

    Our team of experts has researched the online casino options available in Canada. 7 Bit Online Casino has been selected after multiple analyses. We have tried and tested multiple online casino options before picking our top one. The features, gaming options, bonuses, promotions, rewards, and robust security measures were considered during the analysis.

    7Bit Online Casino: Our Favourite Online Casino in Canada

    7Bit Casino is chosen as the leading casino option from the list of the best online casino options in Canada. It can be considered a go-to platform for Canadians interested in the best online casino experience.

    7Bit Casino is a Curacao-licensed gambling platform with a welcome bonus offer of up to C$10,800 in bonus bets and 250 free spins throughout your first four deposits. This marks one of the highest casino bonus offers available in Canada. With such an exciting welcome bonus offer, 7Bit Casino provides a boosted bankroll to its users and permits them to explore the platform more confidently.

    7Bit also provides many offers that can be leveraged by users. These bonus rewards are provided to enhance the user experience in many forms. A wide range of bonus rewards, along with an impressive selection of casino games in which players can get an advantage, are provided by the platform.

    The 7Bit Casino games library is one of the largest, with more than 7000 top online casino games. These games include Bitcoin games, slots, live casino games, and jackpots etc.

    More than bonuses and a wide selection of games are available on the platform 7Bit Casino offers seamless payment options to beginners. It offers a collection of payment methods for making deposits and withdrawals from the platform.

    7Bit Casino provides round-the-clock customer support through live chat and email. To ensure that help and support are available to its users when they face any inconveniences.

    Pros & Cons of 7Bit Casino

    Pros:

    • A great collection of 7000+ games
    • Great welcome bonus offer
    • Availability of live casino games
    • Multiple payment methods
    • VIP program for pro users

    Cons:

    • High Transaction Charges
    • No dedicated mobile application
    • Huge minimum deposit and withdrawal requirements.

    How to join 7Bit Online Casino?

    The process of joining 7Bit Online Casino has been designed for both beginners and professional players. To complete the registration process without any difficulty, follow the steps below:

    Step 1: Go to the official 7Bit Casino Canada Website, then click the Signup button. You have to confirm the authenticity of the platform twice before signing up.

    Step 2: Enter your details such as email address, strong password, etc. Keep it handy to make the process smoother.

    Step 3: Select your currency for the transaction, agree to the T&C, and continue. The platform offers multiple transaction methods, you can choose the most convenient one from the lot.

    Step 4: Complete the 7Bit Casino sign-up form with address, name, date of birth, gender, and phone number.

    Step 5: After signing up, you can make your first deposit, proceed to claim your bonus, and start playing your favourite games. Be careful while initiating the deposit. Make sure to claim your bonus, and voila, you are good to go.

    Always submit accurate details while registering your account to ensure that you don’t have trouble in the future. Be focused on entering the promo codes, as wrong entries will disqualify the bonus rewards. Once the process is completed, you can enjoy the unlimited gaming options 7Bit provides.

    ✔️SIGN UP TO 7BIT CASINO AND START WITH YOUR WELCOME BONUS TODAY!

    How We Selected 7Bit as the Best Online Casino in Canada

    In the selection process of the best online casinos in Canada, we followed a strict set of criteria. These criteria are just to ensure that our recommendations related to the gaming experience are safe, rewarding, and worth enough.

    Here we provide the major criteria that we considered before confirming 7Bit Casino as one of the best online casinos for Canadian players in 2025.

    1. License and Security
    Online Casinos require a legitimate gaming license and robust security protocols. 7Bit Casino functions under a Curacao license and employs all the necessary encryption required to secure the information from malicious attacks. The strict restrictions ensure its trustworthiness and reliability.

    2. Bonuses, Promotions & Tournaments
    Bonuses and promotions play a major role in the player’s gaming experience while interacting with the platform. These bonus points allow the player to get more value and a chance to win the game. Therefore, online casinos with the best bonuses and promotional offers, like 7Bit Casino. 7Bit casino provides a generous welcome bonus of 325% up to 10800 CAD and 250 Free Spins, and an array of bonuses and promotions for its users

    • 1st Deposit Offer: 100% + 100 FS
    • 2nd Deposit Offer: 75% + 100 FS
    • 3rd Deposit Offer: 50% Match
    • 4th Deposit Offer: 100% + 50 FS
    • Weekly cashbacks worth up to 20%.
    • Monday Offer: 25% + 50 FS
    • Wednesday Offer: Up to 100 FS
    • New Game Offer: 45 FS
    • Telegram Offer: 50 FS
    • Titans Arena; $8000
    • Platipus Rush: €2000
    • 10 Years of Platipus: € 100,000
    • Lucky Spin: $1500 + 1500 Free Spins

    ✔️JOIN 7BIT CASINO TO GET 325% UP TO 10800 CAD AND 250 FREE SPINS

    3. Casino Games
    7Bit online casino offers a comprehensive gaming selection to its participants. The platform ensures that players with multiple preferences get catered to, irrespective of whether it’s slots, poker, or even the strategy of games such as blackjack and roulette. Slots enthusiasts can select from more than 7400 games.

    These games have multiple themes and formats, from classic three-reel slots to video slots and even progressive jackpots that offer the potential for significant victory.

    4. Casino game providers
    The quality of the game in an online casino is heavily dependent on the game providers behind it. The game providers ensure the fairness and graphics of the game, along with its gaming experience. 7Bit games are known for their over-the-top gaming experience. Gamers can have a good time while potentially enjoying their bonuses.

    5. Payment Options
    7Bit Casino provides fast, flexible, and secure payment options to its users. Being one of the best online casinos Canada in 2025, 7Bit Casino supports a solid range of transaction options that can be used to perform transactions on the platform. You can easily choose from the payment options available.

    6. Customer Support
    24/7 Customer support is provided by the 7Bit casino platform for its users. We ensured that 7Bit Casino offers responsive customer support that addresses the issues of the users. You can email them or have a conversation on their live chat option.

    If you have any inconvenience within the platform, their dedicated team will rescue you immediately. You can be at ease knowing that a team of dedicated professionals is available to assist.

    7Bit Best Online Casino Games

    The best online casinos do not hesitate when it comes to the selection of games on their platform. The best online casinos in Canada often provide a great library of games. Here we examine some of the most popular games provided on the best online casino. These games include;

    • Online Slots

    Online slots are the most popular casino game that offers the potential for a large payout for players. Online slots provide bonus rounds, multipliers, and progressive jackpots that enhance the experience and potential winnings. There are more than 7000 slot games for slot enthusiasts. Some of the slot games provided by the casino include Sweet Bonanza, Legacy of Dead, and Buffalo Trail.

    Blackjack is an existing casino game that is a combination of luck and skill. Players at 7Bit Casino can engage in multiple Blackjack variants. Using these variants, players can enjoy the game in their own style and preference.

    • Live Dealer Options

    Players are interested in the live dealer option, in which Evolution Gaming brings the action straight to users. Play games with live dealers in real time, similar to a real casino from your home.

    • Speciality games

    Specialty games allow users to try their luck with scratch cards or jump into a bingo session for a change of pace. Evoplay and NetEnt provide their games to these specialty offerings. It is a great way to combine things when you require a break from the usual casino actions of 7Bit Casino.

    7Bit Casino Payment Methods

    The best online casinos in Canada provide multiple payment methods. The players get the convenience and flexibility of using their preferred methods. In addition to having multiple choices, 7Bit Casino ensures that the transaction processes are seamless and easy to follow.

    Here we provide the most convenient methods that are allowed by online casinos in Canada.

    • Debit card/Credit card

    Debit and Credit cards are the most popular payment methods as they are convenient and popular. Players can use debit and credit cards from providers such as Visa, MasterCard.

    • Cryptocurrency

    7Bit Casino players can deposit or withdraw using major cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Dogecoin, etc. Their increasing popularity in Canada as a mode of payment in online casinos is increasing because they offer faster transactions, enhanced security, anonymity, and decreased transaction costs.

    E-wallets like eZeeWallet, AstroPay offer digital payment options that allow players to store, send, and receive money without sharing their bank details with the casino. It provides faster, secure transactions in online casinos in Canada.

    Responsible Gambling in 7Bit Canadian Online Casino

    Online casinos provide an existing gambling experience. However, the time may change, and players can incur a loss. 7Bit Online Casino prioritizes the safety and well-being of the players. Moreover, it is always advised to approach gambling with some sense of responsibility. It helps to stay regulated in both money and the time invested in online gambling. While most online casinos are targeted towards creating a gaming experience, 7Bit focuses on the all-around experience of its participants. A unique yet innovative move.

    7Bit Casino provides multiple tools to support players in managing their gaming experience. Players are allowed to set deposit and loss limits regularly. It helps to prevent excessive gambling. A bet limit can also be set so that you can maintain control over funds and make sure that players do not cross their comfort zone. 7Bit provides a cool-off period that allows players to take a short break of up to weeks or months with automatic account reactivation notification. This helps you to restart your gaming just when you are ready. That’s an awesome addition for gamers who would like to take some time off.

    7Bit Casino also provides a Permanent Account Closure option for players who are dedicated to stopping gambling altogether. It reinforces the platform’s commitment to the welfare of the players and responsible gaming practices. The platform provides you with the ease of decision-making.

    Conclusion: 7Bit The Best Canadian Online Casino

    If you are looking for the best online casino in Canada, then 7Bit online casino could be the right choice for you. As per our analysis, the platform caters to all the major requirements of the gamers. Since the platform is issued under the license of the Government of Curacao, the authenticity of 7Bit is confirmed. Your personal information will be accurately stored.

    Players from Canada can deposit their Canadian dollars to participate in the platform. This makes traditional gamers comfortable to a great extent. However, you have to know that the withdrawal period for your funds depends on the payment methods you have chosen.

    7Bit has a mobile application for gamers using mobile phones. If you want to play the game on your desktop, you can skip downloading the application.

    ✔️CLAIM YOUR WELCOME BONUS AND PLAY 8,000+ GAMES AT 7Bit CASINO

    Commonly Asked Questions About The Best Online Casinos Canada

    1. Why has 7Bit online casino been identified as one of the best online casinos in Canada?
    A)   7Bit casino has been identified as the best online casinos Canada based on facts like the variety of games that ensure players with different preferences and styles are addressed. The user-friendly interface with multiple payment options, responsive customer support, and many other features contributes to the value of the casino.

    2. What are the unique features of 7Bit Casino?
    A)   7Bit is a must-visit online casino for all gamblers who are interested in a reliable, safe, and fun casino. It offers an extensive list of games, great bonus offers, and a player-centric experience.

    3 . Does 7Bit Casino Canada accept crypto payments?
    A)   Yes, 7Bit Casino Canada supports a wide range of crypto payment options that include Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, etc.

    Customer Support

    Support is available 24/7 via:

    • Live Chat: Instant assistance on the website.
    • Email: support@7bit.com for detailed inquiries.

    Email: support@7bit.com

    Disclaimer and Affiliate Disclosure

    Disclaimer: Gambling online comes with financial risks. Make sure you meet the legal age requirement (19+) in your region and follow local laws. Always engage in responsible gambling and check 7Bit’s official site for the latest terms, as promotions and payment methods may be updated.

    General Disclaimer

    This article is for informational and entertainment purposes only, not legal or financial advice. Content is based on research and user reviews as of writing. No warranties are made, and users must verify information before acting.

    Casino and Gambling Disclaimer

    Online gambling carries risks and isn’t for everyone. Confirm you’re of legal gambling age in your jurisdiction. Gambling laws vary, and compliance is your responsibility. We don’t promote gambling; participation is at your risk. 7Bit Casino is a third-party platform, and we’re not liable for losses or disputes.

    Affiliate Disclosure

    This article may include affiliate links, earning us a commission at no cost to you for qualifying actions. These support our content. Our reviews are unbiased, and we recommend only valuable products.

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/4279a210-7c59-48a8-8b7e-4137a50005bb

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Guest Speaker: George Papaconstantinou, Former Minister of Finance in Greece

    Source: Universities – Science Po in English

    On 29 April, we were honoured to welcome George Papaconstantinou, former Minister of Finance in Greece, Director of the Florence School of Transnational Governance at the European University Institute, and Jean Pisani-Ferry, Professor of Economics at Sciences Po. This event was titled “New World New Rules: Global Cooperation in a World of Geopolitical Rivalries” and organised by the Paris School of International Affairs (PSIA) with the Centre for International Studies (CERI). Arancha González, Dean of PSIA, chaired the event.

    The need for collective action has never been greater, it’s one of today’s most pressing global policy challenges.

    In a sense, the demand for global governance rules has never been as big as it is today. On the supply side, there has never before, in the last 30, 40 years, been so little appetite for rules. States are really not willing to give up their ability to set their own rules and subject themselves to general rules that we would all abide by. And perhaps the most emblematic case of all is not China, it’s America.

    George Papaconstantinou

    Our guest speakers examined governance practices across several key policy areas – climate, health, trade and competition, banking and finance, taxation, migration and the digital economy. They considered what works and what doesn’t, outlined a new agenda for global governance, and discussed the role of Europe in this new environment.

    > Watch the full event now:

    MIL OSI Europe News