NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Trade

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Upgraded ASEAN-Australia-NZ FTA enters into force

    Source: New Zealand Government

    An upgraded ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement (AANZFTA) takes effect today, strengthening New Zealand’s trade ties with Southeast Asia and Australia.
    “At a time of global uncertainty, this upgrade gives Kiwi exporters the certainty they need to grow their businesses, create jobs, and boost the economy,” Trade and Investment Minister Todd McClay says.
    The agreement streamlines customs processes, improves the flow of essential goods during crises, and reduces non-tariff barriers, making it easier for New Zealand businesses to trade across the region.
    ASEAN — which includes Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam — is New Zealand’s fourth-largest trading partner. Combined with Australia, two-way trade under AANZFTA is worth more than $59 billion a year.
    “Most of our goods already enter ASEAN markets tariff-free. This upgrade sharpens the rules for services, e-commerce, and supply chains, giving Kiwi businesses the tools to trade more efficiently and compete with confidence,” Mr McClay says.
    “With ASEAN marking 50 years of dialogue with New Zealand this year, the upgrade highlights the Government’s commitment to strengthening ties and unlocking new opportunities for exporters.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Stats NZ information release: Overseas merchandise trade: March 2025

    Source: Statistics New Zealand

    Overseas merchandise trade: March 2025 – 22 April 2025 – Overseas merchandise trade statistics provide information on imports and exports of merchandise goods between New Zealand and other countries.

    Correction to the overseas merchandise trade (OMT) series EXP+.S2PT04F for the period June 2016 to February 2025

    In this release we have corrected the June 2016 to February 2025 overseas merchandise trade ‘Value of Exports & re-exports – milk powder, butter, and cheese’ monthly, quarterly, and annual Infoshare series EXP+.S2PT04F, to correct an error in data processing .This does not affect the series EXP+.S2U04AF.

    Infoshare changes by date has further information about this correction.

    Key facts
    This release refers to trade in goods only.

    In March 2025, compared with March 2024:

    • goods exports rose by $1.2 billion (19 percent), to $7.6 billion
    • goods imports rose by $723 million (12 percent), to $6.6 billion
    • the monthly trade balance was a surplus of $970 million.

    Files:

    • Overseas merchandise trade: March 2025
    • Overseas merchandise trade datasets

     

    MIL OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Stats NZ information release: Overseas merchandise trade: March 2025

    Source: Statistics New Zealand

    Overseas merchandise trade: March 2025 – 22 April 2025 – Overseas merchandise trade statistics provide information on imports and exports of merchandise goods between New Zealand and other countries.

    Correction to the overseas merchandise trade (OMT) series EXP+.S2PT04F for the period June 2016 to February 2025

    In this release we have corrected the June 2016 to February 2025 overseas merchandise trade ‘Value of Exports & re-exports – milk powder, butter, and cheese’ monthly, quarterly, and annual Infoshare series EXP+.S2PT04F, to correct an error in data processing .This does not affect the series EXP+.S2U04AF.

    Infoshare changes by date has further information about this correction.

    Key facts
    This release refers to trade in goods only.

    In March 2025, compared with March 2024:

    • goods exports rose by $1.2 billion (19 percent), to $7.6 billion
    • goods imports rose by $723 million (12 percent), to $6.6 billion
    • the monthly trade balance was a surplus of $970 million.

    Files:

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Australia: Move more, think sharper: How physical activity boosts brain health in ageing

    Source:

    22 April 2025

    A brisk walk, a splash of water aerobics, or even a light jog around the block – if your heart rate goes up then so too will your brain health according to new research from the University of South Australia.

    Conducted in partnership with the US-based AdventHealth Research Institute, the new study found that staying active through moderate-to-vigorous physical activity is associated with significantly better processing speed, working memory, and executive function in older adults.

    Interestingly, the biggest cognitive gains were seen among people who went from doing no moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, to even doing just five minutes, clearly illustrating the power of exercise for the human brain.

    Assessing data from 585 older adults (aged 65-80 years) in the USA-based IGNITE trial*, the study examined associations between time spent in sleep, sedentary behaviour, light physical activity, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity across the 24-hr day, and cognitive performance.

    Researchers identified a two-way relationship between ‘huff-and-puff’ physical activity and brain health: do more exercise and your brain health improves; but do less and it declines.

    UniSA researcher, Dr Maddison Mellow says the study highlights how small changes to your daily activities can have big impacts on your brain health.

    “There are three mutually exclusive lifestyle behaviours in the 24-hour day – sleep, sedentary behaviour and physical activity – and how these interact to influence our health outcomes,” Dr Mellow says.

    “For example, we know that being more active can improve our sleep; or having a better night’s sleep could boost our energy levels to perform physical activity the next day. But what we don’t know is the optimal balance of time spent in each of these behaviours to maximise cognitive performance.

    “In this study we explored how different uses of time impact your brain. We found that higher levels of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity – that is, activity performed at higher intensities that increases your heart rate and breathing – was related to better cognitive performance.

    “Specifically, ‘huff-and-puff’ physical activity (like aerobic exercise) improves processing speed (how fast your brain thinks), executive function (how well you plan, focus, and multitask) and working memory (your ability to store information for short periods of time).

    “Importantly, the opposite was also true: lower levels of this higher intensity physical activity were related to poorer performance on these tests.”

    The findings were consistent across different genetic and demographic backgrounds. Interestingly, the findings did not extend to episodic memory (the what, where and when details of an event) or visuospatial function outcomes (your ability to recognise places and navigate through spaces).

    Co-researcher, Dr Audrey Collins, says understanding the interplay between different activities could empower older people to make positive health changes.

    “There are only 24 hours in a day, so every day, we make decisions about how we spend our time. For example, if we sleep for eight hours, then there’s 16 hours remaining for waking behaviours like physical activity or sedentary behaviour; that’s the basic reality,” Dr Collins says.

    “Our results show that how we choose to spend our time across the 24-hour day may be differentially related to our brain health.

    “Understanding that we need to prioritise physical activity – such as physical activity that gets our heart rates up, according to our findings – is the key.

    “With one in six people in the world expected to be 60 years or older by 2030, we need to make sure we are supporting and empowering people to age well.

    “In this instance, we hope that knowledge is power: boost your physical activity and boost your brain health to stay fit and well as you age. However, these results are cross-sectional and need to be tested longitudinally and experimentally.”

    Notes for editors:

    * The IGNITE study was conducted at the University of Pittsburgh (Pittsburgh, PA), University of Kansas Medical Center (Kansas City, KS), and Northeastern University (Boston, MA) and involved a large, well-characterised sample of cognitively unimpaired older adults. Participants were, on average, 69.8 years of age, predominantly female (70%), and self-reported as inactive.

    …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

    Contacts for interview:  Dr Maddison Mellow E: Maddison.Mellow@unisa.edu.au

    Dr Audrey Collins E: CFD.ExternalComm@adventhealth.com
    Media contact: Annabel Mansfield M: +61 479 182 489  E: Annabel.Mansfield@unisa.edu.au

    MIL OSI News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Wintrust Financial Corporation Reports Record First Quarter 2025 Net Income

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ROSEMONT, Ill., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Wintrust Financial Corporation (“Wintrust”, “the Company”, “we” or “our”) (Nasdaq: WTFC) announced record quarterly net income of $189.0 million, or $2.69 per diluted common share, for the first quarter of 2025, compared to net income of $185.4 million, or $2.63 per diluted common share in the fourth quarter of 2024. Pre-tax, pre-provision income (non-GAAP) totaled a record $277.0 million, compared to $270.1 million for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Timothy S. Crane, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “Building on our record results in 2024, we are pleased with our strong start to the year. Our balanced business model supported disciplined loan growth, which was funded by robust deposit growth in the first quarter of 2025.”

    Additionally, Mr. Crane noted, “Net interest margin in the first quarter increased by five basis points to 3.56% compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The improvement in net interest margin was primarily attributed to decreased funding costs. The higher net interest margin and balance sheet growth supported record net interest income levels in the first quarter of 2025.”

    Highlights of the first quarter of 2025:
    Comparative information to the fourth quarter of 2024, unless otherwise noted

    • Total loans increased by $653 million, or 6% annualized.
    • Total deposits increased by approximately $1.1 billion, or 8% annualized.
    • Total assets increased by $1.0 billion, or 6% annualized.
    • Net interest income increased to $526.5 million in the first quarter of 2025, compared to $525.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2024, supported by improvement in net interest margin and balance sheet growth.        
      • Net interest margin increased to 3.54% (3.56% on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, non-GAAP) during the first quarter of 2025.
    • Non-interest income and non-interest expense were relatively stable in the first quarter of 2025. Notable impacts were:
      • Net gains on investment securities totaled $3.2 million.
      • Macatawa Bank acquisition-related costs were $2.7 million.
    • Provision for credit losses totaled $24.0 million in the first quarter of 2025, as compared to a provision for credit losses of $17.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.
    • Net charge-offs totaled $12.6 million, or 11 basis points of average total loans on an annualized basis, in the first quarter of 2025 compared to $15.9 million, or 13 basis points of average total loans on an annualized basis, in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Mr. Crane noted, “The Company exhibited disciplined and consistent loan growth, as loans increased by $653 million compared to the prior quarter, or 6% on an annualized basis. Loan pipelines are strong and we remain prudent in our review of credit opportunities, ensuring our loan growth adheres to our conservative credit standards. Strong deposit growth of $1.1 billion, or 8% on an annualized basis, in the first quarter of 2025 outpaced loan growth, which resulted in our loans-to-deposits ratio ending the quarter at 90.9%. Non-interest bearing deposits totaled $11.2 billion and comprised 21% of total deposits at the end of the first quarter of 2025. We continue to leverage our enviable market positioning to generate deposits, grow loans and expand our franchise value.”

    Commenting on credit quality, Mr. Crane stated, “Prudent credit management, involving in-depth reviews of the portfolio, has led to positive outcomes by proactively identifying and resolving problem credits in a timely fashion. We continue to be conservative, diversified, and maintain our consistently strong credit standards. We believe the Company’s reserves are appropriate and we remain committed to maintaining credit quality as evidenced by our improved net charge-offs, stable levels of non-performing loans and our core loan allowance for credit losses of 1.37%.”

    In summary, Mr. Crane concluded, “Overall, we are proud of our first quarter results and believe we are well-positioned to continue our strong momentum as we navigate the macroeconomic uncertainty in 2025. The first quarter results highlighted the quality of our core deposit franchise and multifaceted nature of our business model, which uniquely positions us to be successful. Anticipated solid loan growth in the second quarter, combined with a stable net interest margin should result in higher levels of net interest income in the second quarter of 2025. Increasing our long-term franchise value and net interest income, coupled with disciplined expense control and maintaining our conservative credit standards, remain our focus in 2025.”

    The graphs shown on pages 3-7 illustrate certain financial highlights of the first quarter of 2025 as well as historical financial performance. See “Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios” at Table 17 for additional information with respect to non-GAAP financial measures/ratios, including the reconciliations to the corresponding GAAP financial measures/ratios.

    Graphs available at the following link: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/cdbdc506-1b5a-4776-ae2e-e0b14106e712

    SUMMARY OF RESULTS:

    BALANCE SHEET

    Total assets increased $1.0 billion in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. Total loans increased by $653.4 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The increase in loans was primarily driven by growth in the commercial and premium finance life insurance loan portfolios.

    Total liabilities increased by $734.2 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, driven by a $1.1 billion increase in total deposits. Robust organic deposit growth in the first quarter of 2025 was driven by our diverse deposit product offerings. Non-interest bearing deposits as a percentage of total deposits were 21% at March 31, 2025, relatively stable compared to recent quarters. The Company’s loans-to-deposits ratio ended the quarter at 90.9%.

    For more information regarding changes in the Company’s balance sheet, see Consolidated Statements of Condition and Table 1 through Table 3 in this report.

    NET INTEREST INCOME

    For the first quarter of 2025, net interest income totaled $526.5 million, an increase of $1.3 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, primarily due to improvement in net interest margin and growth in the balance sheet, partially offset by two fewer calendar days in the quarter.

    Net interest margin increased to 3.54% (3.56% on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, non-GAAP) during the first quarter of 2025, up five basis points compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The yield on earning assets declined 11 basis points during the first quarter of 2025 primarily due to a 15 basis point decrease in loan yields. The net free funds contribution declined six basis points compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. These declines were more than offset by a 22 basis point reduction in funding cost, primarily due to a 23 basis point decline in the rate paid on interest-bearing deposits, compared to the fourth quarter of 2024.

    For more information regarding net interest income, see Table 4 through Table 7 in this report.

    ASSET QUALITY

    The allowance for credit losses totaled $448.4 million as of March 31, 2025, an increase from $437.1 million as of December 31, 2024. A provision for credit losses totaling $24.0 million was recorded for the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $17.0 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2024. The higher provision for credit losses recognized in the first quarter of 2025 is primarily attributable to impacts related to the macroeconomic outlook. Future economic performance remains uncertain, thus downside risks to the baseline scenario, including widening credit spreads and lower valuations in financial markets, were considered to derive a qualitative addition to the provision for the first quarter of 2025. For more information regarding the allowance for credit losses and provision for credit losses, see Table 10 in this report.

    Management believes the allowance for credit losses is appropriate to account for expected credit losses. The Company is required to estimate expected credit losses over the life of the Company’s financial assets as of the reporting date. There can be no assurances, however, that future losses will not significantly exceed the amounts provided for, thereby affecting future results of operations. A summary of the allowance for credit losses calculated for the loan components in each portfolio as of March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and September 30, 2024 is shown on Table 11 of this report.

    Net charge-offs totaled $12.6 million in the first quarter of 2025, a decrease of $3.3 million as compared to $15.9 million of net charge-offs in the fourth quarter of 2024. Net charge-offs as a percentage of average total loans were 11 basis points in the first quarter of 2025 on an annualized basis, compared to 13 basis points on an annualized basis in the fourth quarter of 2024. For more information regarding net charge-offs, see Table 9 in this report.

    The Company’s delinquency rates remain low and manageable. For more information regarding past due loans, see Table 12 in this report.

    Non-performing assets and non-performing loans have remained relatively stable compared to prior quarters. Non-performing assets totaled $195.0 million and comprised 0.30% of total assets as of March 31, 2025, as compared to $193.9 million, or 0.30% of total assets, as of December 31, 2024. Non-performing loans totaled $172.4 million and comprised 0.35% of total loans at March 31, 2025, as compared to $170.8 million and 0.36% of total loans at December 31, 2024. For more information regarding non-performing assets, see Table 13 in this report.

    NON-INTEREST INCOME

    Non-interest income totaled $116.6 million in the first quarter of 2025, increasing $3.2 million, as compared to $113.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Wealth management revenue decreased by $4.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. Revenue in the first quarter of 2025 was impacted by the transition of systems and support for brokerage and certain private client business to a new third party in the current quarter, as well as lower assets under management due to lower market valuations. The reduction in revenue was driven by anticipated slowdown in activity from the transition, market conditions, and certain offsets to expenses. Wealth management revenue is comprised of the trust and asset management revenue of Wintrust Private Trust Company and Great Lakes Advisors, the brokerage commissions, managed money fees and insurance product commissions at Wintrust Investments and fees from tax-deferred like-kind exchange services provided by the Chicago Deferred Exchange Company.

    Mortgage banking revenue totaling $20.5 million in the first quarter of 2025 was essentially unchanged compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. For more information regarding mortgage banking revenue, see Table 15 in this report.

    The Company recognized $19.4 million in service charges on deposit accounts in the first quarter of 2025, as compared to $18.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The $0.5 million increase in the first quarter of 2025 was primarily due to increased commercial account fees.

    The Company recognized $3.2 million in net gains on investment securities in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $2.8 million in net losses in the fourth quarter of 2024. The net gains in the first quarter of 2025 were primarily the result of unrealized gains on the Company’s equity investment securities with a readily determinable fair value.

    For more information regarding non-interest income, see Table 14 in this report.

    NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

    Non-interest expenses totaled $366.1 million in the first quarter of 2025, decreasing $2.4 million as compared to $368.5 million in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Salaries and employee benefits expense decreased by $0.6 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. This was primarily driven by decreased commissions and incentives compensation expense related to lower mortgage originations and wealth management revenue in the quarter partially offset by higher salaries expense which can be attributed to annual merit increases taking effect in the first quarter of the year.

    Advertising and marketing expenses in the first quarter of 2025 totaled $12.3 million, which was a $0.8 million decrease as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The reduction in the first quarter is primarily due to timing of marketing campaigns, sponsorship arrangements and other investments.

    Professional fees expense totaled $9.0 million in the first quarter of 2025, resulting in a decrease of $2.3 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The decrease in the current quarter relates primarily to decreased fees on consulting services. Professional fees include legal, audit, and tax fees, external loan review costs, consulting arrangements and normal regulatory exam assessments.

    Travel and entertainment expense totaled $5.3 million in the first quarter of 2025 which decreased $2.9 million as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The decrease is primarily due to seasonal corporate events that occur during the fourth quarter.

    The Macatawa Bank acquisition related costs were $2.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, primarily driven by consulting expenses, employee retention and severance costs, and contracted resource costs.

    For more information regarding non-interest expense, see Table 16 in this report.

    INCOME TAXES

    The Company recorded income tax expense of $64.0 million in the first quarter compared to $67.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The effective tax rates were 25.30% in the first quarter of 2025 compared to 26.76% in the fourth quarter of 2024. The effective tax rates were partially impacted by the tax effects related to share-based compensation, which fluctuate based on the Company’s stock price and timing of employee stock option exercises and vesting of other share-based awards. The Company recorded net excess tax benefits of $3.7 million in the first quarter of 2025, compared to excess tax benefits of $50,000 in the fourth quarter of 2024 related to share-based compensation.

    BUSINESS SUMMARY

    Community Banking

    Through community banking, the Company provides banking and financial services primarily to individuals, small to mid-sized businesses, local governmental units and institutional clients residing primarily in the local areas the Company services. In the first quarter of 2025, community banking increased its commercial, commercial real estate and residential real estate loan portfolios.

    Mortgage banking revenue was $20.5 million for both the first quarter of 2025, and the fourth quarter of 2024. See Table 15 for more detail. Service charges on deposit accounts totaled $19.4 million in the first quarter of 2025 as compared to $18.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2024. The Company’s gross commercial and commercial real estate loan pipelines remained solid as of March 31, 2025 indicating momentum for expected continued loan growth in the second quarter of 2025.

    Specialty Finance

    Through specialty finance, the Company offers financing of insurance premiums for businesses and individuals, equipment financing through structured loans and lease products to customers in a variety of industries, accounts receivable financing and value-added, out-sourced administrative services and other services. Originations within the insurance premium financing receivables portfolios were $4.8 billion during the first quarter of 2025. Average balances increased by $213.4 million, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. The Company’s leasing divisions’ portfolio balances increased in the first quarter of 2025, with capital leases, loans, and equipment on operating leases of $2.7 billion, $1.1 billion, and $280.5 million as of March 31, 2025 respectively, as compared to $2.5 billion, $1.1 billion, and $278.3 million as of December 31, 2024, respectively. Revenues from the Company’s out-sourced administrative services business were $1.4 million in the first quarter of 2025, which was relatively stable compared to the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Wealth Management

    Through wealth management, the Company offers a full range of wealth management services, including trust and investment services, tax-deferred like-kind exchange services, asset management, and securities brokerage services. See “Items Impacting Comparative Results,” regarding the sale of the Company’s Retirement Benefits Advisors (“RBA”) division during the first quarter of 2024. Wealth management revenue totaled $34.0 million in the first quarter of 2025, down slightly as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024. At March 31, 2025, the Company’s wealth management subsidiaries had approximately $51.1 billion of assets under administration, which included $8.4 billion of assets owned by the Company and its subsidiary banks.

    ITEMS IMPACTING COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL RESULTS

    Business Combination

    On August 1, 2024, the Company completed its previously announced acquisition of Macatawa, the parent company of Macatawa Bank. In conjunction with the completed acquisition, the Company issued approximately 4.7 million shares of common stock. Macatawa operates 26 full-service branches located throughout communities in Kent, Ottawa and northern Allegan counties in the state of Michigan. Macatawa offers a full range of banking, retail and commercial lending, wealth management and ecommerce services to individuals, businesses and governmental entities. As of August 1, 2024, Macatawa had fair values of approximately $2.9 billion in assets, $2.3 billion in deposits and $1.3 billion in loans. As of March 31, 2025, the Company recorded goodwill of approximately $142.1 million on the purchase.

    Division Sale

    In the first quarter of 2024, the Company sold its RBA division and recorded a net gain of approximately $19.3 million ($20.0 million in other non-interest income from the sale, offset by $0.7 million in commissions/incentive compensation expense).

    WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
    Key Operating Measures

    Wintrust’s key operating measures and growth rates for the first quarter of 2025, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2024 (sequential quarter) and first quarter of 2024 (linked quarter), are shown in the table below:

                  % or (1)basis point (bp) change  from
    4th Quarter
    2024
      % or basis point (bp) change from
    1st Quarter
    2024
        Three Months Ended  
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)   Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Mar 31, 2024  
    Net income   $ 189,039     $ 185,362     $ 187,294   2   %   1   %
    Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP) (2)     277,018       270,060       271,629   3       2    
    Net income per common share – Diluted     2.69       2.63       2.89   2       (7 )  
    Cash dividends declared per common share     0.50       0.45       0.45   11       11    
    Net revenue (3)     643,108       638,599       604,774   1       6    
    Net interest income     526,474       525,148       464,194   0       13    
    Net interest margin     3.54 %     3.49 %     3.57 % 5   bps   (3 ) bps
    Net interest margin – fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (2)     3.56       3.51       3.59   5       (3 )  
    Net overhead ratio (4)     1.58       1.60       1.39   (2 )     19    
    Return on average assets     1.20       1.16       1.35   4       (15 )  
    Return on average common equity     12.21       11.82       14.42   39       (221 )  
    Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) (2)     14.72       14.29       16.75   43       (203 )  
    At end of period                      
    Total assets   $ 65,870,066     $ 64,879,668     $ 57,576,933   6   %   14   %
    Total loans (5)     48,708,390       48,055,037       43,230,706   6       13    
    Total deposits     53,570,038       52,512,349       46,448,858   8       15    
    Total shareholders’ equity     6,600,537       6,344,297       5,436,400   16       21    

    (1)   Period-end balance sheet percentage changes are annualized.
    (2)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
    (3)   Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income.
    (4)   The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that period’s average total assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency.
    (5)   Excludes mortgage loans held-for-sale.

    Certain returns, yields, performance ratios, or quarterly growth rates are “annualized” in this presentation to represent an annual time period. This is done for analytical purposes to better discern, for decision-making purposes, underlying performance trends when compared to full-year or year-over-year amounts. For example, a 5% growth rate for a quarter would represent an annualized 20% growth rate. Additional supplemental financial information showing quarterly trends can be found on the Company’s website at www.wintrust.com by choosing “Financial Reports” under the “Investor Relations” heading, and then choosing “Financial Highlights.”


    WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION

    Selected Financial Highlights

        Three Months Ended
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)   Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
    Selected Financial Condition Data (at end of period):
    Total assets   $ 65,870,066     $ 64,879,668     $ 63,788,424     $ 59,781,516     $ 57,576,933  
    Total loans (1)     48,708,390       48,055,037       47,067,447       44,675,531       43,230,706  
    Total deposits     53,570,038       52,512,349       51,404,966       48,049,026       46,448,858  
    Total shareholders’ equity     6,600,537       6,344,297       6,399,714       5,536,628       5,436,400  
    Selected Statements of Income Data:                    
    Net interest income   $ 526,474     $ 525,148     $ 502,583     $ 470,610     $ 464,194  
    Net revenue (2)     643,108       638,599       615,730       591,757       604,774  
    Net income     189,039       185,362       170,001       152,388       187,294  
    Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP) (3)     277,018       270,060       255,043       251,404       271,629  
    Net income per common share – Basic     2.73       2.68       2.51       2.35       2.93  
    Net income per common share – Diluted     2.69       2.63       2.47       2.32       2.89  
    Cash dividends declared per common share     0.50       0.45       0.45       0.45       0.45  
    Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:                    
    Performance Ratios:                    
    Net interest margin     3.54 %     3.49 %     3.49 %     3.50 %     3.57 %
    Net interest margin – fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (3)     3.56       3.51       3.51       3.52       3.59  
    Non-interest income to average assets     0.74       0.71       0.74       0.85       1.02  
    Non-interest expense to average assets     2.32       2.31       2.36       2.38       2.41  
    Net overhead ratio (4)     1.58       1.60       1.62       1.53       1.39  
    Return on average assets     1.20       1.16       1.11       1.07       1.35  
    Return on average common equity     12.21       11.82       11.63       11.61       14.42  
    Return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) (3)     14.72       14.29       13.92       13.49       16.75  
    Average total assets   $ 64,107,042     $ 63,594,105     $ 60,915,283     $ 57,493,184     $ 55,602,695  
    Average total shareholders’ equity     6,460,941       6,418,403       5,990,429       5,450,173       5,440,457  
    Average loans to average deposits ratio     92.3 %     91.9 %     93.8 %     95.1 %     94.5 %
    Period-end loans to deposits ratio     90.9       91.5       91.6       93.0       93.1  
    Common Share Data at end of period:                    
    Market price per common share   $ 112.46     $ 124.71     $ 108.53     $ 98.56     $ 104.39  
    Book value per common share     92.47       89.21       90.06       82.97       81.38  
    Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) (3)     78.83       75.39       76.15       72.01       70.40  
    Common shares outstanding     66,919,325       66,495,227       66,481,543       61,760,139       61,736,715  
    Other Data at end of period:                    
    Common equity to assets ratio     9.4 %     9.1 %     9.4 %     8.6 %     8.7 %
    Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP) (3)     8.1       7.8       8.1       7.5       7.6  
    Tier 1 leverage ratio (5)     9.6       9.4       9.6       9.3       9.4  
    Risk-based capital ratios:                    
    Tier 1 capital ratio (5)     10.8       10.7       10.6       10.3       10.3  
    Common equity tier 1 capital ratio (5)     10.1       9.9       9.8       9.5       9.5  
    Total capital ratio (5)     12.5       12.3       12.2       12.1       12.2  
    Allowance for credit losses (6)   $ 448,387     $ 437,060     $ 436,193     $ 437,560     $ 427,504  
    Allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related commitment losses to total loans     0.92 %     0.91 %     0.93 %     0.98 %     0.99 %
    Number of:                    
    Bank subsidiaries     16       16       16       15       15  
    Banking offices     208       205       203       177       176  

    (1)   Excludes mortgage loans held-for-sale.
    (2)   Net revenue is net interest income plus non-interest income.
    (3)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
    (4)   The net overhead ratio is calculated by netting total non-interest expense and total non-interest income, annualizing this amount, and dividing by that period’s average total assets. A lower ratio indicates a higher degree of efficiency.
    (5)   Capital ratios for current quarter-end are estimated.
    (6)   The allowance for credit losses includes the allowance for loan losses, the allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments and the allowance for held-to-maturity securities losses.


    WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

        (Unaudited)       (Unaudited)   (Unaudited)   (Unaudited)
        Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)     2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Assets                    
    Cash and due from banks   $ 616,216     $ 452,017     $ 725,465     $ 415,462     $ 379,825  
    Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements     63       6,519       5,663       62       61  
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks     4,238,237       4,409,753       3,648,117       2,824,314       2,131,077  
    Available-for-sale securities, at fair value     4,220,305       4,141,482       3,912,232       4,329,957       4,387,598  
    Held-to-maturity securities, at amortized cost     3,564,490       3,613,263       3,677,420       3,755,924       3,810,015  
    Trading account securities     —       4,072       3,472       4,134       2,184  
    Equity securities with readily determinable fair value     270,442       215,412       125,310       112,173       119,777  
    Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock     281,893       281,407       266,908       256,495       224,657  
    Brokerage customer receivables     —       18,102       16,662       13,682       13,382  
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale, at fair value     316,804       331,261       461,067       411,851       339,884  
    Loans, net of unearned income     48,708,390       48,055,037       47,067,447       44,675,531       43,230,706  
    Allowance for loan losses     (378,207 )     (364,017 )     (360,279 )     (363,719 )     (348,612 )
    Net loans     48,330,183       47,691,020       46,707,168       44,311,812       42,882,094  
    Premises, software and equipment, net     776,679       779,130       772,002       722,295       744,769  
    Lease investments, net     280,472       278,264       270,171       275,459       283,557  
    Accrued interest receivable and other assets     1,598,255       1,739,334       1,721,090       1,671,334       1,580,142  
    Trade date securities receivable     463,023       —       551,031       —       —  
    Goodwill     796,932       796,942       800,780       655,955       656,181  
    Other acquisition-related intangible assets     116,072       121,690       123,866       20,607       21,730  
    Total assets   $ 65,870,066     $ 64,879,668     $ 63,788,424     $ 59,781,516     $ 57,576,933  
    Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity                    
    Deposits:                    
    Non-interest-bearing   $ 11,201,859     $ 11,410,018     $ 10,739,132     $ 10,031,440     $ 9,908,183  
    Interest-bearing     42,368,179       41,102,331       40,665,834       38,017,586       36,540,675  
    Total deposits     53,570,038       52,512,349       51,404,966       48,049,026       46,448,858  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     3,151,309       3,151,309       3,171,309       3,176,309       2,676,751  
    Other borrowings     529,269       534,803       647,043       606,579       575,408  
    Subordinated notes     298,360       298,283       298,188       298,113       437,965  
    Junior subordinated debentures     253,566       253,566       253,566       253,566       253,566  
    Accrued interest payable and other liabilities     1,466,987       1,785,061       1,613,638       1,861,295       1,747,985  
    Total liabilities     59,269,529       58,535,371       57,388,710       54,244,888       52,140,533  
    Shareholders’ Equity:                    
    Preferred stock     412,500       412,500       412,500       412,500       412,500  
    Common stock     67,007       66,560       66,546       61,825       61,798  
    Surplus     2,494,347       2,482,561       2,470,228       1,964,645       1,954,532  
    Treasury stock     (9,156 )     (6,153 )     (6,098 )     (5,760 )     (5,757 )
    Retained earnings     4,045,854       3,897,164       3,748,715       3,615,616       3,498,475  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss     (410,015 )     (508,335 )     (292,177 )     (512,198 )     (485,148 )
    Total shareholders’ equity     6,600,537       6,344,297       6,399,714       5,536,628       5,436,400  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 65,870,066     $ 64,879,668     $ 63,788,424     $ 59,781,516     $ 57,576,933  

    WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

      Three Months Ended
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Interest income                  
    Interest and fees on loans $ 768,362     $ 789,038     $ 794,163     $ 749,812     $ 710,341  
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale   4,246       5,623       6,233       5,434       4,146  
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks   36,766       46,256       32,608       19,731       16,658  
    Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements   179       53       277       17       19  
    Investment securities   72,016       67,066       69,592       69,779       69,678  
    Trading account securities   11       6       11       13       18  
    Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve Bank stock   5,307       5,157       5,451       4,974       4,478  
    Brokerage customer receivables   78       302       269       219       175  
    Total interest income   886,965       913,501       908,604       849,979       805,513  
    Interest expense                  
    Interest on deposits   320,233       346,388       362,019       335,703       299,532  
    Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances   25,441       26,050       26,254       24,797       22,048  
    Interest on other borrowings   6,792       7,519       9,013       8,700       9,248  
    Interest on subordinated notes   3,714       3,733       3,712       5,185       5,487  
    Interest on junior subordinated debentures   4,311       4,663       5,023       4,984       5,004  
    Total interest expense   360,491       388,353       406,021       379,369       341,319  
    Net interest income   526,474       525,148       502,583       470,610       464,194  
    Provision for credit losses   23,963       16,979       22,334       40,061       21,673  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   502,511       508,169       480,249       430,549       442,521  
    Non-interest income                  
    Wealth management   34,042       38,775       37,224       35,413       34,815  
    Mortgage banking   20,529       20,452       15,974       29,124       27,663  
    Service charges on deposit accounts   19,362       18,864       16,430       15,546       14,811  
    Gains (losses) on investment securities, net   3,196       (2,835 )     3,189       (4,282 )     1,326  
    Fees from covered call options   3,446       2,305       988       2,056       4,847  
    Trading (losses) gains, net   (64 )     (113 )     (130 )     70       677  
    Operating lease income, net   15,287       15,327       15,335       13,938       14,110  
    Other   20,836       20,676       24,137       29,282       42,331  
    Total non-interest income   116,634       113,451       113,147       121,147       140,580  
    Non-interest expense                  
    Salaries and employee benefits   211,526       212,133       211,261       198,541       195,173  
    Software and equipment   34,717       34,258       31,574       29,231       27,731  
    Operating lease equipment   10,471       10,263       10,518       10,834       10,683  
    Occupancy, net   20,778       20,597       19,945       19,585       19,086  
    Data processing   11,274       10,957       9,984       9,503       9,292  
    Advertising and marketing   12,272       13,097       18,239       17,436       13,040  
    Professional fees   9,044       11,334       9,783       9,967       9,553  
    Amortization of other acquisition-related intangible assets   5,618       5,773       4,042       1,122       1,158  
    FDIC insurance   10,926       10,640       10,512       10,429       14,537  
    OREO expenses, net   643       397       (938 )     (259 )     392  
    Other   38,821       39,090       35,767       33,964       32,500  
    Total non-interest expense   366,090       368,539       360,687       340,353       333,145  
    Income before taxes   253,055       253,081       232,709       211,343       249,956  
    Income tax expense   64,016       67,719       62,708       58,955       62,662  
    Net income $ 189,039     $ 185,362     $ 170,001     $ 152,388     $ 187,294  
    Preferred stock dividends   6,991       6,991       6,991       6,991       6,991  
    Net income applicable to common shares $ 182,048     $ 178,371     $ 163,010     $ 145,397     $ 180,303  
    Net income per common share – Basic $ 2.73     $ 2.68     $ 2.51     $ 2.35     $ 2.93  
    Net income per common share – Diluted $ 2.69     $ 2.63     $ 2.47     $ 2.32     $ 2.89  
    Cash dividends declared per common share $ 0.50     $ 0.45     $ 0.45     $ 0.45     $ 0.45  
    Weighted average common shares outstanding   66,726       66,491       64,888       61,839       61,481  
    Dilutive potential common shares   923       1,233       1,053       926       928  
    Average common shares and dilutive common shares   67,649       67,724       65,941       62,765       62,409  

    TABLE 1: LOAN PORTFOLIO MIX AND GROWTH RATES

                        % Growth From
    (Dollars in thousands) Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Dec 31,
    2024 (1)
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Balance:                        
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale, excluding early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies $ 181,580     $ 189,774     $ 314,693     $ 281,103     $ 193,064   (18 )%   (6 )%
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale, early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies   135,224       141,487       146,374       130,748       146,820   (18 )   (8 )
    Total mortgage loans held-for-sale $ 316,804     $ 331,261     $ 461,067     $ 411,851     $ 339,884   (18 )%   (7 )%
                             
    Core loans:                        
    Commercial                        
    Commercial and industrial $ 6,871,206     $ 6,867,422     $ 6,774,683     $ 6,236,290     $ 6,117,004   0 %   12 %
    Asset-based lending   1,701,962       1,611,001       1,709,685       1,465,867       1,355,255   23     26  
    Municipal   798,646       826,653       827,125       747,357       721,526   (14 )   11  
    Leases   2,680,943       2,537,325       2,443,721       2,439,128       2,344,295   23     14  
    Commercial real estate                        
    Residential construction   55,849       48,617       73,088       55,019       57,558   60     (3 )
    Commercial construction   2,086,797       2,065,775       1,984,240       1,866,701       1,748,607   4     19  
    Land   306,235       319,689       346,362       338,831       344,149   (17 )   (11 )
    Office   1,641,555       1,656,109       1,675,286       1,585,312       1,566,748   (4 )   5  
    Industrial   2,677,555       2,628,576       2,527,932       2,307,455       2,190,200   8     22  
    Retail   1,402,837       1,374,655       1,404,586       1,365,753       1,366,415   8     3  
    Multi-family   3,091,314       3,125,505       3,193,339       2,988,940       2,922,432   (4 )   6  
    Mixed use and other   1,652,759       1,685,018       1,588,584       1,439,186       1,437,328   (8 )   15  
    Home equity   455,683       445,028       427,043       356,313       340,349   10     34  
    Residential real estate                        
    Residential real estate loans for investment   3,561,417       3,456,009       3,252,649       2,933,157       2,746,916   12     30  
    Residential mortgage loans, early buy-out eligible loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies   86,952       114,985       92,355       88,503       90,911   (99 )   (4 )
    Residential mortgage loans, early buy-out exercised loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies   36,790       41,771       43,034       45,675       52,439   (48 )   (30 )
    Total core loans $ 29,108,500     $ 28,804,138     $ 28,363,712     $ 26,259,487     $ 25,402,132   4 %   15 %
                             
    Niche loans:                        
    Commercial                        
    Franchise $ 1,262,555     $ 1,268,521     $ 1,191,686     $ 1,150,460     $ 1,122,302   (2 )%   12 %
    Mortgage warehouse lines of credit   1,019,543       893,854       750,462       593,519       403,245   57     NM
    Community Advantage – homeowners association   525,492       525,446       501,645       491,722       475,832   0     10  
    Insurance agency lending   1,070,979       1,044,329       1,048,686       1,030,119       964,022   10     11  
    Premium Finance receivables                        
    U.S. property & casualty insurance   6,486,663       6,447,625       6,253,271       6,142,654       6,113,993   2     6  
    Canada property & casualty insurance   753,199       824,417       878,410       958,099       826,026   (35 )   (9 )
    Life insurance   8,365,140       8,147,145       7,996,899       7,962,115       7,872,033   11     6  
    Consumer and other   116,319       99,562       82,676       87,356       51,121   68     NM
    Total niche loans $ 19,599,890     $ 19,250,899     $ 18,703,735     $ 18,416,044     $ 17,828,574   7 %   10 %
                             
    Total loans, net of unearned income $ 48,708,390     $ 48,055,037     $ 47,067,447     $ 44,675,531     $ 43,230,706   6 %   13 %

    (1)   Annualized.


    TABLE 2: DEPOSIT PORTFOLIO MIX AND GROWTH RATES

                        % Growth From
    (Dollars in thousands) Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Dec 31,
    2024 (1)
      Mar 31, 2024
    Balance:                        
    Non-interest-bearing $ 11,201,859     $ 11,410,018     $ 10,739,132     $ 10,031,440     $ 9,908,183   (7 )%   13 %
    NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits   6,340,168       5,865,546       5,466,932       5,053,909       5,720,947   33     11  
    Wealth management deposits (2)   1,408,790       1,469,064       1,303,354       1,490,711       1,347,817   (17 )   5  
    Money market   18,074,733       17,975,191       17,713,726       16,320,017       15,617,717   2     16  
    Savings   6,576,251       6,372,499       6,183,249       5,882,179       5,959,774   13     10  
    Time certificates of deposit   9,968,237       9,420,031       9,998,573       9,270,770       7,894,420   24     26  
    Total deposits $ 53,570,038     $ 52,512,349     $ 51,404,966     $ 48,049,026     $ 46,448,858   8 %   15 %
    Mix:                        
    Non-interest-bearing   21 %     22 %     21 %     21 %     21 %      
    NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits   12       11       11       11       12        
    Wealth management deposits (2)   3       3       3       3       3        
    Money market   34       34       34       34       34        
    Savings   12       12       12       12       13        
    Time certificates of deposit   18       18       19       19       17        
    Total deposits   100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %     100 %      

    (1)   Annualized.
    (2)   Represents deposit balances of the Company’s subsidiary banks from brokerage customers of Wintrust Investments, Chicago Deferred Exchange Company, LLC (“CDEC”), and trust and asset management customers of the Company.


    TABLE 3
    : TIME CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT MATURITY/RE-PRICING ANALYSIS
    As of March 31, 2025

    (Dollars in thousands)   Total Time
    Certificates of
    Deposit
      Weighted-Average
    Rate of Maturing
    Time Certificates
    of Deposit
    1-3 months   $ 3,845,120     4.34 %
    4-6 months     2,345,184     3.81  
    7-9 months     2,694,739     3.72  
    10-12 months     711,206     3.62  
    13-18 months     210,063     3.03  
    19-24 months     87,336     2.72  
    24+ months     74,589     2.47  
    Total   $ 9,968,237     3.94 %

    TABLE 4: QUARTERLY AVERAGE BALANCES

        Average Balance for three months ended,
        Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)     2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents (1)   $ 3,520,048     $ 3,934,016     $ 2,413,728     $ 1,485,481     $ 1,254,332  
    Investment securities (2)     8,409,735       8,090,271       8,276,576       8,203,764       8,349,796  
    FHLB and FRB stock     281,702       271,825       263,707       253,614       230,648  
    Liquidity management assets (3)   $ 12,211,485     $ 12,296,112     $ 10,954,011     $ 9,942,859     $ 9,834,776  
    Other earning assets (3)(4)     13,140       20,528       17,542       15,257       15,081  
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale     286,710       378,707       376,251       347,236       290,275  
    Loans, net of unearned income (3)(5)     47,833,380       47,153,014       45,920,586       43,819,354       42,129,893  
    Total earning assets (3)   $ 60,344,715     $ 59,848,361     $ 57,268,390     $ 54,124,706     $ 52,270,025  
    Allowance for loan and investment security losses     (375,371 )     (367,238 )     (383,736 )     (360,504 )     (361,734 )
    Cash and due from banks     476,423       470,033       467,333       434,916       450,267  
    Other assets     3,661,275       3,642,949       3,563,296       3,294,066       3,244,137  
    Total assets   $ 64,107,042     $ 63,594,105     $ 60,915,283     $ 57,493,184     $ 55,602,695  
                         
    NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits   $ 6,046,189     $ 5,601,672     $ 5,174,673     $ 4,985,306     $ 5,680,265  
    Wealth management deposits     1,574,480       1,430,163       1,362,747       1,531,865       1,510,203  
    Money market accounts     17,581,141       17,579,395       16,436,111       15,272,126       14,474,492  
    Savings accounts     6,479,444       6,288,727       6,096,746       5,878,844       5,792,118  
    Time deposits     9,406,126       9,702,948       9,598,109       8,546,172       7,148,456  
    Interest-bearing deposits   $ 41,087,380     $ 40,602,905     $ 38,668,386     $ 36,214,313     $ 34,605,534  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     3,151,309       3,160,658       3,178,973       3,096,920       2,728,849  
    Other borrowings     582,139       577,786       622,792       587,262       627,711  
    Subordinated notes     298,306       298,225       298,135       410,331       437,893  
    Junior subordinated debentures     253,566       253,566       253,566       253,566       253,566  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   $ 45,372,700     $ 44,893,140     $ 43,021,852     $ 40,562,392     $ 38,653,553  
    Non-interest-bearing deposits     10,732,156       10,718,738       10,271,613       9,879,134       9,972,646  
    Other liabilities     1,541,245       1,563,824       1,631,389       1,601,485       1,536,039  
    Equity     6,460,941       6,418,403       5,990,429       5,450,173       5,440,457  
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity   $ 64,107,042     $ 63,594,105     $ 60,915,283     $ 57,493,184     $ 55,602,695  
                         
    Net free funds/contribution (6)   $ 14,972,015     $ 14,955,221     $ 14,246,538     $ 13,562,314     $ 13,616,472  

    (1)   Includes interest-bearing deposits from banks and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of greater than three months. Cash equivalents include federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements with original maturities of three months or less.
    (2)   Investment securities includes investment securities classified as available-for-sale and held-to-maturity, and equity securities with readily determinable fair values. Equity securities without readily determinable fair values are included within other assets.
    (3)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
    (4)   Other earning assets include brokerage customer receivables and trading account securities.
    (5)   Loans, net of unearned income, include non-accrual loans.
    (6)   Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.


    TABLE 5: QUARTERLY NET INTEREST INCOME

        Net Interest Income for three months ended,
        Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)     2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Interest income:                    
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents   $ 36,945     $ 46,308     $ 32,885     $ 19,748     $ 16,677  
    Investment securities     72,706       67,783       70,260       70,346       70,228  
    FHLB and FRB stock     5,307       5,157       5,451       4,974       4,478  
    Liquidity management assets (1)   $ 114,958     $ 119,248     $ 108,596     $ 95,068     $ 91,383  
    Other earning assets (1)     92       310       282       235       198  
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale     4,246       5,623       6,233       5,434       4,146  
    Loans, net of unearned income (1)     770,568       791,390       796,637       752,117       712,587  
    Total interest income   $ 889,864     $ 916,571     $ 911,748     $ 852,854     $ 808,314  
                         
    Interest expense:                    
    NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits   $ 33,600     $ 31,695     $ 30,971     $ 32,719     $ 34,896  
    Wealth management deposits     8,606       9,412       10,158       10,294       10,461  
    Money market accounts     146,374       159,945       167,382       155,100       137,984  
    Savings accounts     35,923       38,402       42,892       41,063       39,071  
    Time deposits     95,730       106,934       110,616       96,527       77,120  
    Interest-bearing deposits   $ 320,233     $ 346,388     $ 362,019     $ 335,703     $ 299,532  
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances     25,441       26,050       26,254       24,797       22,048  
    Other borrowings     6,792       7,519       9,013       8,700       9,248  
    Subordinated notes     3,714       3,733       3,712       5,185       5,487  
    Junior subordinated debentures     4,311       4,663       5,023       4,984       5,004  
    Total interest expense   $ 360,491     $ 388,353     $ 406,021     $ 379,369     $ 341,319  
                         
    Less: Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment     (2,899 )     (3,070 )     (3,144 )     (2,875 )     (2,801 )
    Net interest income (GAAP) (2)     526,474       525,148       502,583       470,610       464,194  
    Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment     2,899       3,070       3,144       2,875       2,801  
    Net interest income, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (2)   $ 529,373     $ 528,218     $ 505,727     $ 473,485     $ 466,995  

    (1)   Interest income on tax-advantaged loans, trading securities and investment securities reflects a taxable-equivalent adjustment based on the marginal federal corporate tax rate in effect as of the applicable period.
    (2)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.


    TABLE 6: QUARTERLY NET INTEREST MARGIN

        Net Interest Margin for three months ended,
        Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Yield earned on:                    
    Interest-bearing deposits with banks, securities purchased under resale agreements and cash equivalents   4.26 %   4.68 %   5.42 %   5.35 %   5.35 %
    Investment securities   3.51     3.33     3.38     3.45     3.38  
    FHLB and FRB stock   7.64     7.55     8.22     7.89     7.81  
    Liquidity management assets   3.82 %   3.86 %   3.94 %   3.85 %   3.74 %
    Other earning assets   2.84     6.01     6.38     6.23     5.25  
    Mortgage loans held-for-sale   6.01     5.91     6.59     6.29     5.74  
    Loans, net of unearned income   6.53     6.68     6.90     6.90     6.80  
    Total earning assets   5.98 %   6.09 %   6.33 %   6.34 %   6.22 %
                         
    Rate paid on:                    
    NOW and interest-bearing demand deposits   2.25 %   2.25 %   2.38 %   2.64 %   2.47 %
    Wealth management deposits   2.22     2.62     2.97     2.70     2.79  
    Money market accounts   3.38     3.62     4.05     4.08     3.83  
    Savings accounts   2.25     2.43     2.80     2.81     2.71  
    Time deposits   4.13     4.38     4.58     4.54     4.34  
    Interest-bearing deposits   3.16 %   3.39 %   3.72 %   3.73 %   3.48 %
    Federal Home Loan Bank advances   3.27     3.28     3.29     3.22     3.25  
    Other borrowings   4.73     5.18     5.76     5.96     5.92  
    Subordinated notes   5.05     4.98     4.95     5.08     5.04  
    Junior subordinated debentures   6.90     7.32     7.88     7.91     7.94  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   3.22 %   3.44 %   3.75 %   3.76 %   3.55 %
                         
    Interest rate spread (1)(2)   2.76 %   2.65 %   2.58 %   2.58 %   2.67 %
    Less: Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment   (0.02 )   (0.02 )   (0.02 )   (0.02 )   (0.02 )
    Net free funds/contribution (3)   0.80     0.86     0.93     0.94     0.92  
    Net interest margin (GAAP) (2)   3.54 %   3.49 %   3.49 %   3.50 %   3.57 %
    Fully taxable-equivalent adjustment   0.02     0.02     0.02     0.02     0.02  
    Net interest margin, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP) (2)   3.56 %   3.51 %   3.51 %   3.52 %   3.59 %

    (1)   Interest rate spread is the difference between the yield earned on earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
    (2)   See Table 17: Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures/Ratios for additional information on this performance measure/ratio.
    (3)   Net free funds are the difference between total average earning assets and total average interest-bearing liabilities. The estimated contribution to net interest margin from net free funds is calculated using the rate paid for total interest-bearing liabilities.


    TABLE 7
    : INTEREST RATE SENSITIVITY

    As an ongoing part of its financial strategy, the Company attempts to manage the impact of fluctuations in market interest rates on net interest income. Management measures its exposure to changes in interest rates by modeling many different interest rate scenarios.

    The following interest rate scenarios display the percentage change in net interest income over a one-year time horizon assuming increases and decreases of 100 and 200 basis points as compared to projected net interest income in a scenario with no assumed rate changes. The Static Shock Scenario results incorporate actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for balance sheet instruments following an instantaneous, parallel change in market rates based upon a static (i.e. no growth or constant) balance sheet. Conversely, the Ramp Scenario results incorporate management’s projections of future volume and pricing of each of the product lines following a gradual, parallel change in market rates over twelve months. Actual results may differ from these simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies. The interest rate sensitivity for both the Static Shock and Ramp Scenario is as follows:

    Static Shock Scenario   +200 Basis
    Points
      +100 Basis
    Points
      -100 Basis
    Points
      -200 Basis
    Points
    Mar 31, 2025   (1.8 )%   (0.6 )%   (0.2 )%   (1.2 )%
    Dec 31, 2024   (1.6 )   (0.6 )   (0.3 )   (1.5 )
    Sep 30, 2024   1.2     1.1     0.4     (0.9 )
    Jun 30, 2024   1.5     1.0     0.6     (0.0 )
    Mar 31, 2024   1.9     1.4     1.5     1.6  
    Ramp Scenario +200 Basis
    Points
      +100 Basis
    Points
      -100 Basis
    Points
        -200 Basis
    Points
    Mar 31, 2025 0.2 %   0.2 %   (0.1 )%   (0.5 )%
    Dec 31, 2024 (0.2 )   (0.0 )   0.0     (0.3 )
    Sep 30, 2024 1.6     1.2     0.7     0.5  
    Jun 30, 2024 1.2     1.0     0.9     1.0  
    Mar 31, 2024 0.8     0.6     1.3     2.0  

    As shown above, the magnitude of potential changes in net interest income in various interest rate scenarios has continued to remain relatively neutral. As the current interest rate cycle progressed, management took action to reposition its sensitivity to interest rates. To this end, management has executed various derivative instruments including collars and receive fixed swaps to hedge variable rate loan exposures and originated a higher percentage of its loan originations in longer-term fixed-rate loans. The Company will continue to monitor current and projected interest rates and may execute additional derivatives to mitigate potential fluctuations in the net interest margin in future periods.


    TABLE 8
    : MATURITIES AND SENSITIVITIES TO CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES

      Loans repricing or contractual maturity period
    As of March 31, 2025
    (In thousands)
    One year or
    less
      From one to
    five years
      From five to fifteen years   After fifteen years   Total
    Commercial                  
    Fixed rate $ 405,736     $ 3,600,171     $ 2,122,563     $ 20,444     $ 6,148,914  
    Variable rate   9,781,709       703       —       —       9,782,412  
    Total commercial $ 10,187,445     $ 3,600,874     $ 2,122,563     $ 20,444     $ 15,931,326  
    Commercial real estate                  
    Fixed rate $ 658,413     $ 2,762,221     $ 365,181     $ 63,593     $ 3,849,408  
    Variable rate   9,054,583       10,843       67       —       9,065,493  
    Total commercial real estate $ 9,712,996     $ 2,773,064     $ 365,248     $ 63,593     $ 12,914,901  
    Home equity                  
    Fixed rate $ 8,881     $ 838     $ —     $ 17     $ 9,736  
    Variable rate   445,947       —       —       —       445,947  
    Total home equity $ 454,828     $ 838     $ —     $ 17     $ 455,683  
    Residential real estate                  
    Fixed rate $ 13,336     $ 4,473     $ 74,883     $ 1,055,143     $ 1,147,835  
    Variable rate   97,815       623,879       1,815,630       —       2,537,324  
    Total residential real estate $ 111,151     $ 628,352     $ 1,890,513     $ 1,055,143     $ 3,685,159  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty                  
    Fixed rate $ 7,135,963     $ 103,899     $ —     $ —     $ 7,239,862  
    Variable rate   —       —       —       —       —  
    Total premium finance receivables – property & casualty $ 7,135,963     $ 103,899     $ —     $ —     $ 7,239,862  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance                  
    Fixed rate $ 350,802     $ 207,832     $ 4,000     $ 4,248     $ 566,882  
    Variable rate   7,798,258       —       —       —       7,798,258  
    Total premium finance receivables – life insurance $ 8,149,060     $ 207,832     $ 4,000     $ 4,248     $ 8,365,140  
    Consumer and other                  
    Fixed rate $ 44,731     $ 7,937     $ 883     $ 914     $ 54,465  
    Variable rate   61,854       —       —       —       61,854  
    Total consumer and other $ 106,585     $ 7,937     $ 883     $ 914     $ 116,319  
                       
    Total per category                  
    Fixed rate $ 8,617,862     $ 6,687,371     $ 2,567,510     $ 1,144,359     $ 19,017,102  
    Variable rate   27,240,166       635,425       1,815,697       —       29,691,288  
    Total loans, net of unearned income $ 35,858,028     $ 7,322,796     $ 4,383,207     $ 1,144,359     $ 48,708,390  
    Less: Existing cash flow hedging derivatives (1)   (6,700,000 )                
    Total loans repricing or maturing in one year or less, adjusted for cash flow hedging activity $ 29,158,028                  
                       
    Variable Rate Loan Pricing by Index:                  
    SOFR tenors (2)                 $ 18,328,835  
    12- month CMT (3)                   6,722,305  
    Prime                   3,420,624  
    Fed Funds                   819,437  
    Other U.S. Treasury tenors                   190,187  
    Other                   209,900  
    Total variable rate                 $ 29,691,288  

    (1)   Excludes cash flow hedges with future effective starting dates.
    (2)   SOFR – Secured Overnight Financing Rate.
    (3)   CMT – Constant Maturity Treasury Rate.

    Graph available at the following link: http://ml.globenewswire.com/Resource/Download/bebf97a7-5d4d-430d-a436-ae832412a4db

    Source: Bloomberg

    As noted in the table on the previous page, the majority of the Company’s portfolio is tied to SOFR and CMT indices which, as shown in the table above, do not mirror the same changes as the Prime rate, which has historically moved when the Federal Reserve raises or lowers interest rates. Specifically, the Company has variable rate loans of $15.4 billion tied to one-month SOFR and $6.7 billion tied to twelve-month CMT. The above chart shows:

        Basis Point (bp) Change in
        1-month
    SOFR
      12- month CMT   Prime  
    First Quarter 2025   (1 ) bps (13 ) bps 0   bps
    Fourth Quarter 2024   (52 )   18     (50 )  
    Third Quarter 2024   (49 )   (111 )   (50 )  
    Second Quarter 2024   1     6     0    
    First Quarter 2024   (2 )   24     0    

    TABLE 9: ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

        Three Months Ended
        Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars in thousands)     2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Allowance for credit losses at beginning of period   $ 437,060     $ 436,193     $ 437,560     $ 427,504     $ 427,612  
    Provision for credit losses – Other     23,963       16,979       6,787       40,061       21,673  
    Provision for credit losses – Day 1 on non-PCD assets acquired during the period     —       —       15,547       —       —  
    Initial allowance for credit losses recognized on PCD assets acquired during the period     —       —       3,004       —       —  
    Other adjustments     4       (187 )     30       (19 )     (31 )
    Charge-offs:                    
    Commercial     9,722       5,090       22,975       9,584       11,215  
    Commercial real estate     454       1,037       95       15,526       5,469  
    Home equity     —       —       —       —       74  
    Residential real estate     —       114       —       23       38  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty     7,114       13,301       7,790       9,486       6,938  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance     12       —       4       —       —  
    Consumer and other     147       189       154       137       107  
    Total charge-offs     17,449       19,731       31,018       34,756       23,841  
    Recoveries:                    
    Commercial     929       775       649       950       479  
    Commercial real estate     12       172       30       90       31  
    Home equity     216       194       101       35       29  
    Residential real estate     136       0       5       8       2  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty     3,487       2,646       3,436       3,658       1,519  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance     —       —       41       5       8  
    Consumer and other     29       19       21       24       23  
    Total recoveries     4,809       3,806       4,283       4,770       2,091  
    Net charge-offs     (12,640 )     (15,925 )     (26,735 )     (29,986 )     (21,750 )
    Allowance for credit losses at period end   $ 448,387     $ 437,060     $ 436,193     $ 437,560     $ 427,504  
                         
    Annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) by category as a percentage of its own respective category’s average:
    Commercial     0.23 %     0.11 %     0.61 %     0.25 %     0.33 %
    Commercial real estate     0.01       0.03       0.00       0.53       0.19  
    Home equity     (0.20 )     (0.18 )     (0.10 )     (0.04 )     0.05  
    Residential real estate     (0.02 )     0.01       0.00       0.00       0.01  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty     0.20       0.59       0.24       0.33       0.32  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance     0.00       —       (0.00 )     (0.00 )     (0.00 )
    Consumer and other     0.45       0.63       0.63       0.56       0.42  
    Total loans, net of unearned income     0.11 %     0.13 %     0.23 %     0.28 %     0.21 %
                         
    Loans at period end   $ 48,708,390     $ 48,055,037     $ 47,067,447     $ 44,675,531     $ 43,230,706  
    Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans at period end     0.78 %     0.76 %     0.77 %     0.81 %     0.81 %
    Allowance for loan and unfunded lending-related commitment losses as a percentage of loans at period end     0.92       0.91       0.93       0.98       0.99  

    PCD – Purchase Credit Deteriorated


    TABLE 10
    : ALLOWANCE AND PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES BY COMPONENT

        Three Months Ended
        Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)     2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Provision for loan losses – Other   $ 26,826     $ 19,852     $ 6,782     $ 45,111     $ 26,159  
    Provision for credit losses – Day 1 on non-PCD assets acquired during the period     —       —       15,547       —       —  
    Provision for unfunded lending-related commitments losses – Other     (2,852 )     (2,851 )     17       (5,212 )     (4,468 )
    Provision for held-to-maturity securities losses     (11 )     (22 )     (12 )     162       (18 )
    Provision for credit losses   $ 23,963     $ 16,979     $ 22,334     $ 40,061     $ 21,673  
                         
    Allowance for loan losses   $ 378,207     $ 364,017     $ 360,279     $ 363,719     $ 348,612  
    Allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments losses     69,734       72,586       75,435       73,350       78,563  
    Allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending-related commitments losses     447,941       436,603       435,714       437,069       427,175  
    Allowance for held-to-maturity securities losses     446       457       479       491       329  
    Allowance for credit losses   $ 448,387     $ 437,060     $ 436,193     $ 437,560     $ 427,504  

    PCD – Purchase Credit Deteriorated 


    TABLE 11: ALLOWANCE BY LOAN PORTFOLIO

    The table below summarizes the calculation of allowance for loan losses and allowance for unfunded lending-related commitments losses for the Company’s loan portfolios as well as core and niche portfolios, as of March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and September 30, 2024.

      As of Mar 31, 2025 As of Dec 31, 2024 As of Sep 30, 2024
    (Dollars in thousands) Recorded
    Investment
      Calculated
    Allowance
      % of its
    category’s balance
    Recorded
    Investment
      Calculated
    Allowance
      % of its
    category’s balance
    Recorded
    Investment
      Calculated
    Allowance
      % of its
    category’s balance
    Commercial:                              
    Commercial, industrial and other $ 15,931,326   $ 201,183   1.26 % $ 15,574,551   $ 175,837   1.13 % $ 15,247,693   $ 171,598   1.13 %
    Commercial real estate:                              
    Construction and development   2,448,881     71,388   2.92     2,434,081     87,236   3.58     2,403,690     97,949   4.07  
    Non-construction   10,466,020     138,622   1.32     10,469,863     135,620   1.30     10,389,727     133,195   1.28  
    Total commercial real estate $ 12,914,901   $ 210,010   1.63 % $ 12,903,944   $ 222,856   1.73 % $ 12,793,417   $ 231,144   1.81 %
    Total commercial and commercial real estate $ 28,846,227   $ 411,193   1.43 % $ 28,478,495   $ 398,693   1.40 % $ 28,041,110   $ 402,742   1.44 %
    Home equity   455,683     9,139   2.01     445,028     8,943   2.01     427,043     8,823   2.07  
    Residential real estate   3,685,159     10,652   0.29     3,612,765     10,335   0.29     3,388,038     9,745   0.29  
    Premium finance receivables                              
    Property and casualty insurance   7,239,862     15,310   0.21     7,272,042     17,111   0.24     7,131,681     13,045   0.18  
    Life insurance   8,365,140     729   0.01     8,147,145     709   0.01     7,996,899     698   0.01  
    Consumer and other   116,319     918   0.79     99,562     812   0.82     82,676     661   0.80  
    Total loans, net of unearned income $ 48,708,390   $ 447,941   0.92 % $ 48,055,037   $ 436,603   0.91 % $ 47,067,447   $ 435,714   0.93 %
                                   
    Total core loans (1) $ 29,108,500   $ 397,664   1.37 % $ 28,804,138   $ 392,319   1.36 % $ 28,363,712   $ 396,394   1.40 %
    Total niche loans (1)   19,599,890     50,277   0.26     19,250,899     44,284   0.23     18,703,735     39,320   0.21  

    (1)   See Table 1 for additional detail on core and niche loans.


    TABLE 12
    : LOAN PORTFOLIO AGING

    (In thousands)   Mar 31, 2025   Dec 31, 2024   Sep 30, 2024   Jun 30, 2024   Mar 31, 2024
    Loan Balances:                    
    Commercial                    
    Nonaccrual   $ 70,560     $ 73,490     $ 63,826     $ 51,087     $ 31,740  
    90+ days and still accruing     46       104       20       304       27  
    60-89 days past due     15,243       54,844       32,560       16,485       30,248  
    30-59 days past due     97,397       92,551       46,057       36,358       77,715  
    Current     15,748,080       15,353,562       15,105,230       14,050,228       13,363,751  
    Total commercial   $ 15,931,326     $ 15,574,551     $ 15,247,693     $ 14,154,462     $ 13,503,481  
    Commercial real estate                    
    Nonaccrual   $ 26,187     $ 21,042     $ 42,071     $ 48,289     $ 39,262  
    90+ days and still accruing     —       —       225       —       —  
    60-89 days past due     6,995       10,521       13,439       6,555       16,713  
    30-59 days past due     83,653       30,766       48,346       38,065       32,998  
    Current     12,798,066       12,841,615       12,689,336       11,854,288       11,544,464  
    Total commercial real estate   $ 12,914,901     $ 12,903,944     $ 12,793,417     $ 11,947,197     $ 11,633,437  
    Home equity                    
    Nonaccrual   $ 2,070     $ 1,117     $ 1,122     $ 1,100     $ 838  
    90+ days and still accruing     —       —       —       —       —  
    60-89 days past due     984       1,233       1,035       275       212  
    30-59 days past due     3,403       2,148       2,580       1,229       1,617  
    Current     449,226       440,530       422,306       353,709       337,682  
    Total home equity   $ 455,683     $ 445,028     $ 427,043     $ 356,313     $ 340,349  
    Residential real estate                    
    Early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies (1)   $ 123,742     $ 156,756     $ 135,389     $ 134,178     $ 143,350  
    Nonaccrual     22,522       23,762       17,959       18,198       17,901  
    90+ days and still accruing     —       —       —       —       —  
    60-89 days past due     1,351       5,708       6,364       1,977       —  
    30-59 days past due     38,943       18,917       2,160       130       24,523  
    Current     3,498,601       3,407,622       3,226,166       2,912,852       2,704,492  
    Total residential real estate   $ 3,685,159     $ 3,612,765     $ 3,388,038     $ 3,067,335     $ 2,890,266  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty                    
    Nonaccrual   $ 29,846     $ 28,797     $ 36,079     $ 32,722     $ 32,648  
    90+ days and still accruing     18,081       16,031       18,235       22,427       25,877  
    60-89 days past due     19,717       19,042       18,740       29,925       15,274  
    30-59 days past due     39,459       68,219       30,204       45,927       59,729  
    Current     7,132,759       7,139,953       7,028,423       6,969,752       6,806,491  
    Total Premium finance receivables – property & casualty   $ 7,239,862     $ 7,272,042     $ 7,131,681     $ 7,100,753     $ 6,940,019  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance                    
    Nonaccrual   $ —     $ 6,431     $ —     $ —     $ —  
    90+ days and still accruing     2,962       —       —       —       —  
    60-89 days past due     10,587       72,963       10,902       4,118       32,482  
    30-59 days past due     29,924       36,405       74,432       17,693       100,137  
    Current     8,321,667       8,031,346       7,911,565       7,940,304       7,739,414  
    Total Premium finance receivables – life insurance   $ 8,365,140     $ 8,147,145     $ 7,996,899     $ 7,962,115     $ 7,872,033  
    Consumer and other                    
    Nonaccrual   $ 18     $ 2     $ 2     $ 3     $ 19  
    90+ days and still accruing     98       47       148       121       47  
    60-89 days past due     162       59       22       81       16  
    30-59 days past due     542       882       264       366       210  
    Current     115,499       98,572       82,240       86,785       50,829  
    Total consumer and other   $ 116,319     $ 99,562     $ 82,676     $ 87,356     $ 51,121  
    Total loans, net of unearned income                    
    Early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies (1)   $ 123,742     $ 156,756     $ 135,389     $ 134,178     $ 143,350  
    Nonaccrual     151,203       154,641       161,059       151,399       122,408  
    90+ days and still accruing     21,187       16,182       18,628       22,852       25,951  
    60-89 days past due     55,039       164,370       83,062       59,416       94,945  
    30-59 days past due     293,321       249,888       204,043       139,768       296,929  
    Current     48,063,898       47,313,200       46,465,266       44,167,918       42,547,123  
    Total loans, net of unearned income   $ 48,708,390     $ 48,055,037     $ 47,067,447     $ 44,675,531     $ 43,230,706  

    (1)   Early buy-out loans are insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, subject to indemnifications and insurance limits for certain loans.


    TABLE 13:
    NON-PERFORMING ASSETS(1)

      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars in thousands)   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing:                  
    Commercial $ 46     $ 104     $ 20     $ 304     $ 27  
    Commercial real estate   —       —       225       —       —  
    Home equity   —       —       —       —       —  
    Residential real estate   —       —       —       —       —  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty   18,081       16,031       18,235       22,427       25,877  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance   2,962       —       —       —       —  
    Consumer and other   98       47       148       121       47  
    Total loans past due greater than 90 days and still accruing   21,187       16,182       18,628       22,852       25,951  
    Non-accrual loans:                  
    Commercial   70,560       73,490       63,826       51,087       31,740  
    Commercial real estate   26,187       21,042       42,071       48,289       39,262  
    Home equity   2,070       1,117       1,122       1,100       838  
    Residential real estate   22,522       23,762       17,959       18,198       17,901  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty   29,846       28,797       36,079       32,722       32,648  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance   —       6,431       —       —       —  
    Consumer and other   18       2       2       3       19  
    Total non-accrual loans   151,203       154,641       161,059       151,399       122,408  
    Total non-performing loans:                  
    Commercial   70,606       73,594       63,846       51,391       31,767  
    Commercial real estate   26,187       21,042       42,296       48,289       39,262  
    Home equity   2,070       1,117       1,122       1,100       838  
    Residential real estate   22,522       23,762       17,959       18,198       17,901  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty   47,927       44,828       54,314       55,149       58,525  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance   2,962       6,431       —       —       —  
    Consumer and other   116       49       150       124       66  
    Total non-performing loans $ 172,390     $ 170,823     $ 179,687     $ 174,251     $ 148,359  
    Other real estate owned   22,625       23,116       13,682       19,731       14,538  
    Total non-performing assets $ 195,015     $ 193,939     $ 193,369     $ 193,982     $ 162,897  
    Total non-performing loans by category as a percent of its own respective category’s period-end balance:                  
    Commercial   0.44 %     0.47 %     0.42 %     0.36 %     0.24 %
    Commercial real estate   0.20       0.16       0.33       0.40       0.34  
    Home equity   0.45       0.25       0.26       0.31       0.25  
    Residential real estate   0.61       0.66       0.53       0.59       0.62  
    Premium finance receivables – property & casualty   0.66       0.62       0.76       0.78       0.84  
    Premium finance receivables – life insurance   0.04       0.08       —       —       —  
    Consumer and other   0.10       0.05       0.18       0.14       0.13  
    Total loans, net of unearned income   0.35 %     0.36 %     0.38 %     0.39 %     0.34 %
    Total non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets   0.30 %     0.30 %     0.30 %     0.32 %     0.28 %
    Allowance for loan losses and unfunded lending-related commitments losses as a percentage of non-accrual loans   296.25 %     282.33 %     270.53 %     288.69 %     348.98 %
                       

    (1)   Excludes early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies. Early buy-out loans are insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, subject to indemnifications and insurance limits for certain loans.

    Non-performing Loans Rollforward, excluding early buy-out loans guaranteed by U.S. government agencies

      Three Months Ended
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
                       
    Balance at beginning of period $ 170,823     $ 179,687     $ 174,251     $ 148,359     $ 139,030  
    Additions from becoming non-performing in the respective period   27,721       30,931       42,335       54,376       23,142  
    Additions from assets acquired in the respective period   —       —       189       —       —  
    Return to performing status   (1,207 )     (1,108 )     (362 )     (912 )     (490 )
    Payments received   (15,965 )     (12,219 )     (10,894 )     (9,611 )     (8,336 )
    Transfer to OREO and other repossessed assets   —       (17,897 )     (3,680 )     (6,945 )     (1,381 )
    Charge-offs, net   (8,600 )     (5,612 )     (21,211 )     (7,673 )     (14,810 )
    Net change for premium finance receivables   (382 )     (2,959 )     (941 )     (3,343 )     11,204  
    Balance at end of period $ 172,390     $ 170,823     $ 179,687     $ 174,251     $ 148,359  


    Other Real Estate Owned

      Three Months Ended
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (In thousands)   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Balance at beginning of period $ 23,116     $ 13,682     $ 19,731     $ 14,538     $ 13,309  
    Disposals/resolved   —       (8,545 )     (9,729 )     (1,752 )     —  
    Transfers in at fair value, less costs to sell   —       17,979       3,680       6,945       1,436  
    Fair value adjustments   (491 )     —       —       —       (207 )
    Balance at end of period $ 22,625     $ 23,116     $ 13,682     $ 19,731     $ 14,538  
                       
      Period End
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    Balance by Property Type:   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024  
    Residential real estate $ —     $ —     $ —     $ 161     $ 1,146  
    Commercial real estate   22,625       23,116       13,682       19,570       13,392  
    Total $ 22,625     $ 23,116     $ 13,682     $ 19,731     $ 14,538  

    TABLE 14: NON-INTEREST INCOME

      Three Months Ended Q1 2025 compared to
    Q4 2024
    Q1 2025 compared to
    Q1 2024
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars in thousands)   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024   $ Change   % Change $ Change   % Change
    Brokerage $ 4,757     $ 5,328     $ 6,139     $ 5,588     $ 5,556   $ (571 )   (11 )% $ (799 )   (14 )%
    Trust and asset management   29,285       33,447       31,085       29,825       29,259     (4,162 )   (12 )   26     0  
    Total wealth management   34,042       38,775       37,224       35,413       34,815     (4,733 )   (12 )   (773 )   (2 )
    Mortgage banking   20,529       20,452       15,974       29,124       27,663     77     0     (7,134 )   (26 )
    Service charges on deposit accounts   19,362       18,864       16,430       15,546       14,811     498     3     4,551     31  
    Gains (losses) on investment securities, net   3,196       (2,835 )     3,189       (4,282 )     1,326     6,031     NM   1,870     NM
    Fees from covered call options   3,446       2,305       988       2,056       4,847     1,141     50     (1,401 )   (29 )
    Trading (losses) gains, net   (64 )     (113 )     (130 )     70       677     49     (43 )   (741 )   NM
    Operating lease income, net   15,287       15,327       15,335       13,938       14,110     (40 )   (0 )   1,177     8  
    Other:                              
    Interest rate swap fees   2,269       3,360       2,914       3,392       2,828     (1,091 )   (32 )   (559 )   (20 )
    BOLI   796       1,236       1,517       1,351       1,651     (440 )   (36 )   (855 )   (52 )
    Administrative services   1,393       1,347       1,450       1,322       1,217     46     3     176     14  
    Foreign currency remeasurement (losses) gains   (183 )     (682 )     696       (145 )     (1,171 )   499     (73 )   988     (84 )
    Changes in fair value on EBOs and loans held-for-investment   383       129       518       604       (439 )   254     NM   822     NM
    Early pay-offs of capital leases   768       514       532       393       430     254     49     338     79  
    Miscellaneous   15,410       14,772       16,510       22,365       37,815     638     4     (22,405 )   (59 )
    Total Other   20,836       20,676       24,137       29,282       42,331     160     1     (21,495 )   (51 )
    Total Non-Interest Income $ 116,634     $ 113,451     $ 113,147     $ 121,147     $ 140,580   $ 3,183     3 % $ (23,946 )   (17 )%

    NM – Not meaningful.
    BOLI- Bank-owned life insurance.
    EBO- Early buy-out.


    TABLE 15: MORTGAGE BANKING

      Three Months Ended
    (Dollars in thousands) Mar 31,
    2025
      Dec 31,
    2024
      Sep 30,
    2024
      Jun 30,
    2024
      Mar 31,
    2024
    Originations:                  
    Retail originations $ 348,468     $ 483,424     $ 527,408     $ 544,394     $ 331,504  
    Veterans First originations   111,985       176,914       239,369       177,792       144,109  
    Total originations for sale (A) $ 460,453     $ 660,338     $ 766,777     $ 722,186     $ 475,613  
    Originations for investment   217,177       355,119       218,984       275,331       169,246  
    Total originations $ 677,630     $ 1,015,457     $ 985,761     $ 997,517     $ 644,859  
    As a percentage of originations for sale:                  
    Retail originations   76 %     73 %     69 %     75 %     70 %
    Veterans First originations   24       27       31       25       30  
    Purchases   77 %     65 %     72 %     83 %     75 %
    Refinances   23       35       28       17       25  
    Production Margin:                  
    Production revenue (B) (1) $ 9,941     $ 6,993     $ 13,113     $ 14,990     $ 13,435  
    Total originations for sale (A) $ 460,453     $ 660,338     $ 766,777     $ 722,186     $ 475,613  
    Add: Current period end mandatory interest rate lock commitments to fund originations for sale (2)   197,297       103,946       272,072       222,738       207,775  
    Less: Prior period end mandatory interest rate lock commitments to fund originations for sale (2)   103,946       272,072       222,738       207,775       119,624  
    Total mortgage production volume (C) $ 553,804     $ 492,212     $ 816,111     $ 737,149     $ 563,764  
    Production margin (B / C)   1.80 %     1.42 %     1.61 %     2.03 %     2.38 %
    Mortgage Servicing:                  
    Loans serviced for others (D) $ 12,402,352     $ 12,400,913     $ 12,253,361     $ 12,211,027     $ 12,051,392  
    Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSR”), at fair value (E)   196,307       203,788       186,308       204,610       201,044  
    Percentage of MSRs to loans serviced for others (E / D)   1.58 %     1.64 %     1.52 %     1.68 %     1.67 %
    Servicing income $ 10,611     $ 10,731     $ 10,809     $ 10,586     $ 10,498  
    MSR Fair Value Asset Activity                  
    MSR – FV at Beginning of Period $ 203,788     $ 186,308     $ 204,610     $ 201,044     $ 192,456  
    MSR – current period capitalization   4,669       10,010       6,357       8,223       5,379  
    MSR – collection of expected cash flows – paydowns   (1,590 )     (1,463 )     (1,598 )     (1,504 )     (1,444 )
    MSR – collection of expected cash flows – payoffs and repurchases   (3,046 )     (4,315 )     (5,730 )     (4,030 )     (2,942 )
    MSR – changes in fair value model assumptions   (7,514 )     13,248       (17,331 )     877       7,595  
    MSR Fair Value at end of period $ 196,307     $ 203,788     $ 186,308     $ 204,610     $ 201,044  
    Summary of Mortgage Banking Revenue:                
    Operational:                  
    Production revenue (1) $ 9,941     $ 6,993     $ 13,113     $ 14,990     $ 13,435  
    MSR – Current period capitalization   4,669       10,010       6,357       8,223       5,379  
    MSR – Collection of expected cash flows – paydowns   (1,590 )     (1,463 )     (1,598 )     (1,504 )     (1,444 )
    MSR – Collection of expected cash flows – pay offs   (3,046 )     (4,315 )     (5,730 )     (4,030 )     (2,942 )
    Servicing Income   10,611       10,731       10,809       10,586       10,498  
    Other Revenue   (172 )     (51 )     (67 )     112       (91 )
    Total operational mortgage banking revenue $ 20,413     $ 21,905     $ 22,884     $ 28,377     $ 24,835  
    Fair Value:                  
    MSR – changes in fair value model assumptions $ (7,514 )   $ 13,248     $ (17,331 )   $ 877     $ 7,595  
    Gain (loss) on derivative contract held as an economic hedge, net   4,897       (11,452 )     6,892       (772 )     (2,577 )
    Changes in FV on early buy-out loans guaranteed by US Govt (HFS)   2,733       (3,249 )     3,529       642       (2,190 )
    Total fair value mortgage banking revenue $ 116     $ (1,453 )   $ (6,910 )   $ 747     $ 2,828  
    Total mortgage banking revenue $ 20,529     $ 20,452     $ 15,974     $ 29,124     $ 27,663  

    (1)   Production revenue represents revenue earned from the origination and subsequent sale of mortgages, including gains on loans sold and fees from originations, changes in other related financial instruments carried at fair value, processing and other related activities, and excludes servicing fees, changes in the fair value of servicing rights and changes to the mortgage recourse obligation and other non-production revenue.
    (2)   Certain volume adjusted for the estimated pull-through rate of the loan, which represents the Company’s best estimate of the likelihood that a committed loan will ultimately fund.


    TABLE 16
    : NON-INTEREST EXPENSE

      Three Months Ended Q1 2025 compared to
    Q4 2024
    Q1 2025 compared to
    Q1 2024
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars in thousands)   2025       2024       2024       2024       2024   $ Change   % Change $ Change   % Change
    Salaries and employee benefits:                              
    Salaries $ 123,917     $ 120,969     $ 118,971     $ 113,860     $ 112,172   $ 2,948     2 % $ 11,745     10 %
    Commissions and incentive compensation   52,536       54,792       57,575       52,151       51,001     (2,256 )   (4 )   1,535     3  
    Benefits   35,073       36,372       34,715       32,530       32,000     (1,299 )   (4 )   3,073     10  
    Total salaries and employee benefits   211,526       212,133       211,261       198,541       195,173     (607 )   (0 )   16,353     8  
    Software and equipment   34,717       34,258       31,574       29,231       27,731     459     1     6,986     25  
    Operating lease equipment   10,471       10,263       10,518       10,834       10,683     208     2     (212 )   (2 )
    Occupancy, net   20,778       20,597       19,945       19,585       19,086     181     1     1,692     9  
    Data processing   11,274       10,957       9,984       9,503       9,292     317     3     1,982     21  
    Advertising and marketing   12,272       13,097       18,239       17,436       13,040     (825 )   (6 )   (768 )   (6 )
    Professional fees   9,044       11,334       9,783       9,967       9,553     (2,290 )   (20 )   (509 )   (5 )
    Amortization of other acquisition-related intangible assets   5,618       5,773       4,042       1,122       1,158     (155 )   (3 )   4,460     NM
    FDIC insurance   10,926       10,640       10,512       10,429       9,381     286     3     1,545     16  
    FDIC insurance – special assessment   —       —       —       —       5,156     —     —     (5,156 )   (100 )
    OREO expense, net   643       397       (938 )     (259 )     392     246     62     251     64  
    Other:                              
    Lending expenses, net of deferred origination costs   5,866       6,448       4,995       5,335       5,078     (582 )   (9 )   788     16  
    Travel and entertainment   5,270       8,140       5,364       5,340       4,597     (2,870 )   (35 )   673     15  
    Miscellaneous   27,685       24,502       25,408       23,289       22,825     3,183     13     4,860     21  
    Total other   38,821       39,090       35,767       33,964       32,500     (269 )   (1 )   6,321     19  
    Total Non-Interest Expense $ 366,090     $ 368,539     $ 360,687     $ 340,353     $ 333,145   $ (2,449 )   (1 )% $ 32,945     10 %

    NM – Not meaningful.


    TABLE 17: SUPPLEMENTAL NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES/RATIOS

    The accounting and reporting policies of Wintrust conform to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States and prevailing practices in the banking industry. However, certain non-GAAP performance measures and ratios are used by management to evaluate and measure the Company’s performance. These include taxable-equivalent net interest income (including its individual components), taxable-equivalent net interest margin (including its individual components), the taxable-equivalent efficiency ratio, tangible common equity ratio, tangible book value per common share, return on average tangible common equity, and pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses. Management believes that these measures and ratios provide users of the Company’s financial information a more meaningful view of the performance of the Company’s interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and of the Company’s operating efficiency. Other financial holding companies may define or calculate these measures and ratios differently.

    Management reviews yields on certain asset categories and the net interest margin of the Company and its banking subsidiaries on a fully taxable-equivalent basis (“FTE”). In this non-GAAP presentation, net interest income is adjusted to reflect tax-exempt interest income on an equivalent before-tax basis using tax rates effective as of the end of the period. This measure ensures comparability of net interest income arising from both taxable and tax-exempt sources. Net interest income on a FTE basis is also used in the calculation of the Company’s efficiency ratio. The efficiency ratio, which is calculated by dividing non-interest expense by total taxable-equivalent net revenue (less securities gains or losses), measures how much it costs to produce one dollar of revenue. Securities gains or losses are excluded from this calculation to better match revenue from daily operations to operational expenses. Management considers the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share as useful measurements of the Company’s equity. The Company references the return on average tangible common equity as a measurement of profitability. Management considers pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses, as a useful measurement of the Company’s core net income.

      Three Months Ended
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars and shares in thousands) 2025   2024   2024   2024   2024
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Net Interest Margin and Efficiency Ratio:
    (A) Interest Income (GAAP) $ 886,965     $ 913,501     $ 908,604     $ 849,979     $ 805,513  
    Taxable-equivalent adjustment:                  
    – Loans   2,206       2,352       2,474       2,305       2,246  
    – Liquidity Management Assets   690       716       668       567       550  
    – Other Earning Assets   3       2       2       3       5  
    (B) Interest Income (non-GAAP) $ 889,864     $ 916,571     $ 911,748     $ 852,854     $ 808,314  
    (C) Interest Expense (GAAP)   360,491       388,353       406,021       379,369       341,319  
    (D) Net Interest Income (GAAP) (A minus C) $ 526,474     $ 525,148     $ 502,583     $ 470,610     $ 464,194  
    (E) Net Interest Income (non-GAAP) (B minus C) $ 529,373     $ 528,218     $ 505,727     $ 473,485     $ 466,995  
    Net interest margin (GAAP)   3.54 %     3.49 %     3.49 %     3.50 %     3.57 %
    Net interest margin, fully taxable-equivalent (non-GAAP)   3.56       3.51       3.51       3.52       3.59  
    (F) Non-interest income $ 116,634     $ 113,451     $ 113,147     $ 121,147     $ 140,580  
    (G) Gains (losses) on investment securities, net   3,196       (2,835 )     3,189       (4,282 )     1,326  
    (H) Non-interest expense   366,090       368,539       360,687       340,353       333,145  
    Efficiency ratio (H/(D+F-G))   57.21 %     57.46 %     58.88 %     57.10 %     55.21 %
    Efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) (H/(E+F-G))   56.95       57.18       58.58       56.83       54.95  
      Three Months Ended
      Mar 31,   Dec 31,   Sep 30,   Jun 30,   Mar 31,
    (Dollars and shares in thousands) 2025   2024   2024   2024   2024
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Tangible Common Equity Ratio:
    Total shareholders’ equity (GAAP) $ 6,600,537     $ 6,344,297     $ 6,399,714     $ 5,536,628     $ 5,436,400  
    Less: Non-convertible preferred stock (GAAP)   (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )
    Less: Intangible assets (GAAP)   (913,004 )     (918,632 )     (924,646 )     (676,562 )     (677,911 )
    (I) Total tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) $ 5,275,033     $ 5,013,165     $ 5,062,568     $ 4,447,566     $ 4,345,989  
    (J) Total assets (GAAP) $ 65,870,066     $ 64,879,668     $ 63,788,424     $ 59,781,516     $ 57,576,933  
    Less: Intangible assets (GAAP)   (913,004 )     (918,632 )     (924,646 )     (676,562 )     (677,911 )
    (K) Total tangible assets (non-GAAP) $ 64,957,062     $ 63,961,036     $ 62,863,778     $ 59,104,954     $ 56,899,022  
    Common equity to assets ratio (GAAP) (L/J)   9.4 %     9.1 %     9.4 %     8.6 %     8.7 %
    Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP) (I/K)   8.1       7.8       8.1       7.5       7.6  
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Tangible Book Value per Common Share:
    Total shareholders’ equity $ 6,600,537     $ 6,344,297     $ 6,399,714     $ 5,536,628     $ 5,436,400  
    Less: Preferred stock   (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )
    (L) Total common equity $ 6,188,037     $ 5,931,797     $ 5,987,214     $ 5,124,128     $ 5,023,900  
    (M) Actual common shares outstanding   66,919       66,495       66,482       61,760       61,737  
    Book value per common share (L/M) $ 92.47     $ 89.21     $ 90.06     $ 82.97     $ 81.38  
    Tangible book value per common share (non-GAAP) (I/M)   78.83       75.39       76.15       72.01       70.40  
                       
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Return on Average Tangible Common Equity:
    (N) Net income applicable to common shares $ 182,048     $ 178,371     $ 163,010     $ 145,397     $ 180,303  
    Add: Intangible asset amortization   5,618       5,773       4,042       1,122       1,158  
    Less: Tax effect of intangible asset amortization   (1,421 )     (1,547 )     (1,087 )     (311 )     (291 )
    After-tax intangible asset amortization $ 4,197     $ 4,226     $ 2,955     $ 811     $ 867  
    (O) Tangible net income applicable to common shares (non-GAAP) $ 186,245     $ 182,597     $ 165,965     $ 146,208     $ 181,170  
    Total average shareholders’ equity $ 6,460,941     $ 6,418,403     $ 5,990,429     $ 5,450,173     $ 5,440,457  
    Less: Average preferred stock   (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )     (412,500 )
    (P) Total average common shareholders’ equity $ 6,048,441     $ 6,005,903     $ 5,577,929     $ 5,037,673     $ 5,027,957  
    Less: Average intangible assets   (916,069 )     (921,438 )     (833,574 )     (677,207 )     (678,731 )
    (Q) Total average tangible common shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) $ 5,132,372     $ 5,084,465     $ 4,744,355     $ 4,360,466     $ 4,349,226  
    Return on average common equity, annualized (N/P)   12.21 %     11.82 %     11.63 %     11.61 %     14.42 %
    Return on average tangible common equity, annualized (non-GAAP) (O/Q)   14.72       14.29       13.92       13.49       16.75  
                       
    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Income:    
    Income before taxes $ 253,055     $ 253,081     $ 232,709     $ 211,343     $ 249,956  
    Add: Provision for credit losses   23,963       16,979       22,334       40,061       21,673  
    Pre-tax income, excluding provision for credit losses (non-GAAP) $ 277,018     $ 270,060     $ 255,043     $ 251,404     $ 271,629  

    WINTRUST SUBSIDIARIES

    Wintrust is a financial holding company whose common stock is traded on the Nasdaq Global Select Market (Nasdaq: WTFC) that operates bank retail locations in the greater Chicago, southern Wisconsin, west Michigan, northwest Indiana, and southwest Florida market areas. Its 16 community bank subsidiaries are: Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Beverly Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Crystal Lake Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Hinsdale Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Libertyville Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Macatawa Bank, N.A., Northbrook Bank & Trust Company, N.A., Old Plank Trail Community Bank, N.A., Schaumburg Bank & Trust Company, N.A., St. Charles Bank & Trust Company, N.A., State Bank of The Lakes, N.A., Town Bank, N.A., Village Bank & Trust, N.A., Wheaton Bank & Trust Company, N.A., and Wintrust Bank, N.A.

    Additionally, the Company operates various non-bank businesses:

    • FIRST Insurance Funding and Wintrust Life Finance, each a division of Lake Forest Bank & Trust Company, N.A., serve commercial and life insurance loan customers, respectively, throughout the United States.
    • First Insurance Funding of Canada serves commercial insurance loan customers throughout Canada.
    • Tricom, Inc. of Milwaukee provides high-yielding, short-term accounts receivable financing and value-added out-sourced administrative services, such as data processing of payrolls, billing and cash management services, to temporary staffing service clients located throughout the United States.
    • Wintrust Mortgage, a division of Barrington Bank & Trust Company, N.A., engages primarily in the origination and purchase of residential mortgages for sale into the secondary market through origination offices located throughout the United States. Loans are also originated nationwide through relationships with wholesale and correspondent offices.
    • Wintrust Investments, LLC is a broker-dealer providing a full range of private client and brokerage services to clients and correspondent banks located primarily in the Midwest.
    • Great Lakes Advisors LLC provides money management services and advisory services to individual accounts.
    • Wintrust Private Trust Company, N.A., a trust subsidiary, allows Wintrust to service customers’ trust and investment needs at each banking location.
    • Wintrust Asset Finance offers direct leasing opportunities.
    • CDEC provides Qualified Intermediary services (as defined by U.S. Treasury regulations) for taxpayers seeking to structure tax-deferred like-kind exchanges under Internal Revenue Code Section 1031.

    FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

    This document contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws. Forward-looking information can be identified through the use of words such as “intend,” “plan,” “project,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “contemplate,” “possible,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements and information are not historical facts, are premised on many factors and assumptions, and represent only management’s expectations, estimates and projections regarding future events. Similarly, these statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict, and which may include, but are not limited to, those listed below and the Risk Factors discussed under Item 1A of the Company’s 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K and in any of the Company’s subsequent SEC filings. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and is including this statement for purposes of invoking these safe harbor provisions. Such forward-looking statements may be deemed to include, among other things, statements relating to the Company’s future financial performance, the performance of its loan portfolio, the expected amount of future credit reserves and charge-offs, delinquency trends, growth plans, regulatory developments, securities that the Company may offer from time to time, and management’s long-term performance goals, as well as statements relating to the anticipated effects on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations from expected developments or events, the Company’s business and growth strategies, including future acquisitions of banks, specialty finance or wealth management businesses, internal growth and plans to form additional de novo banks or branch offices. Actual results could differ materially from those addressed in the forward-looking statements as a result of numerous factors, including the following:

    • economic conditions and events that affect the economy, housing prices, the job market and other factors that may adversely affect the Company’s liquidity and the performance of its loan portfolios, including an actual or threatened U.S. government debt default or rating downgrade, particularly in the markets in which it operates;
    • negative effects suffered by us or our customers resulting from changes in U.S. or international trade policies;
    • the extent of defaults and losses on the Company’s loan portfolio, which may require further increases in its allowance for credit losses;
    • estimates of fair value of certain of the Company’s assets and liabilities, which could change in value significantly from period to period;
    • the financial success and economic viability of the borrowers of our commercial loans;
    • commercial real estate market conditions in the Chicago metropolitan area and southern Wisconsin;
    • the extent of commercial and consumer delinquencies and declines in real estate values, which may require further increases in the Company’s allowance for credit losses;
    • inaccurate assumptions in our analytical and forecasting models used to manage our loan portfolio;
    • changes in the level and volatility of interest rates, the capital markets and other market indices that may affect, among other things, the Company’s liquidity and the value of its assets and liabilities;
    • the interest rate environment, including a prolonged period of low interest rates or rising interest rates, either broadly or for some types of instruments, which may affect the Company’s net interest income and net interest margin, and which could materially adversely affect the Company’s profitability;
    • competitive pressures in the financial services business which may affect the pricing of the Company’s loan and deposit products as well as its services (including wealth management services), which may result in loss of market share and reduced income from deposits, loans, advisory fees and income from other products;
    • failure to identify and complete favorable acquisitions in the future or unexpected losses, difficulties or developments related to the Company’s recent or future acquisitions;
    • unexpected difficulties and losses related to FDIC-assisted acquisitions;
    • harm to the Company’s reputation;
    • any negative perception of the Company’s financial strength;
    • ability of the Company to raise additional capital on acceptable terms when needed;
    • disruption in capital markets, which may lower fair values for the Company’s investment portfolio;
    • ability of the Company to use technology to provide products and services that will satisfy customer demands and create efficiencies in operations and to manage risks associated therewith;
    • failure or breaches of our security systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties;
    • security breaches, including denial of service attacks, hacking, social engineering attacks, malware intrusion and similar events or data corruption attempts and identity theft;
    • adverse effects on our information technology systems, or those of third parties, resulting from failures, human error or cyberattacks (including ransomware);
    • adverse effects of failures by our vendors to provide agreed upon services in the manner and at the cost agreed, particularly our information technology vendors;
    • increased costs as a result of protecting our customers from the impact of stolen debit card information;
    • accuracy and completeness of information the Company receives about customers and counterparties to make credit decisions;
    • ability of the Company to attract and retain senior management experienced in the banking and financial services industries;
    • environmental liability risk associated with lending activities;
    • the impact of any claims or legal actions to which the Company is subject, including any effect on our reputation;
    • losses incurred in connection with repurchases and indemnification payments related to mortgages and increases in reserves associated therewith;
    • the loss of customers as a result of technological changes allowing consumers to complete their financial transactions without the use of a bank;
    • the soundness of other financial institutions and the impact of recent failures of financial institutions, including broader financial institution liquidity risk and concerns;
    • the expenses and delayed returns inherent in opening new branches and de novo banks;
    • liabilities, potential customer loss or reputational harm related to closings of existing branches;
    • examinations and challenges by tax authorities, and any unanticipated impact of the Tax Act;
    • changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations, and the impact on the Company’s financial statements;
    • the ability of the Company to receive dividends from its subsidiaries;
    • the impact of the Company’s transition from LIBOR to an alternative benchmark rate for current and future transactions;
    • a decrease in the Company’s capital ratios, including as a result of declines in the value of its loan portfolios, or otherwise;
    • legislative or regulatory changes, particularly changes in regulation of financial services companies and/or the products and services offered by financial services companies;
    • changes in laws, regulations, rules, standards and contractual obligations regarding data privacy and cybersecurity;
    • a lowering of our credit rating;
    • changes in U.S. monetary policy and changes to the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet, including changes in response to persistent inflation or otherwise;
    • regulatory restrictions upon our ability to market our products to consumers and limitations on our ability to profitably operate our mortgage business;
    • increased costs of compliance, heightened regulatory capital requirements and other risks associated with changes in regulation and the regulatory environment;
    • the impact of heightened capital requirements;
    • increases in the Company’s FDIC insurance premiums, or the collection of special assessments by the FDIC;
    • delinquencies or fraud with respect to the Company’s premium finance business;
    • credit downgrades among commercial and life insurance providers that could negatively affect the value of collateral securing the Company’s premium finance loans;
    • the Company’s ability to comply with covenants under its credit facility;
    • fluctuations in the stock market, which may have an adverse impact on the Company’s wealth management business and brokerage operation; and
    • widespread outages of operational, communication, or other systems, whether internal or provided by third parties, natural or other disasters (including acts of terrorism, armed hostilities and pandemics), and the effects of climate change.

    Therefore, there can be no assurances that future actual results will correspond to these forward-looking statements. The reader is cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statement made by the Company. Any such statement speaks only as of the date the statement was made or as of such date that may be referenced within the statement. The Company undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of circumstances or events after the date of the press release. Persons are advised, however, to consult further disclosures management makes on related subjects in its reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in its press releases.

    CONFERENCE CALL, WEBCAST AND REPLAY

    The Company will hold a conference call on Tuesday, April 22, 2025 at 9:00 a.m. (CDT) regarding first quarter 2025 earnings results. Individuals interested in participating in the call by addressing questions to management should register for the call to receive the dial-in numbers and unique PIN at the Conference Call Link included within the Company’s press release dated March 31, 2025 available at the Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Press Releases link on its website at https://www.wintrust.com. A separate simultaneous audio-only webcast link is included within the press release referenced above. Registration for and a replay of the audio-only webcast with an accompanying slide presentation will be available at https://www.wintrust.com, Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Presentations & Conference Calls. The text of the first quarter 2025 earnings press release will also be available on the home page of the Company’s website at https://www.wintrust.com and at the Investor Relations, Investor News and Events, Press Releases link on its website.

    FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
    Timothy S. Crane, President & Chief Executive Officer
    David A. Dykstra, Vice Chairman & Chief Operating Officer
    (847) 939-9000
    Web site address: www.wintrust.com

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: UK to step up military partnership with New Zealand as both countries drive forward defence and security agenda

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    UK to step up military partnership with New Zealand as both countries drive forward defence and security agenda

    The UK is set to deepen defence and security ties with New Zealand as the Prime Minster strengthens alliances abroad to protect Britain’s national interest.

    • Prime Minister Keir Starmer and New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon set to step up support for Ukraine with new drone contract and extension to Operation Interflex
    • Comes as leaders agree to deepen defence and security ties, with the Royal New Zealand Navy preparing to join the UK’s Carrier Strike Group as it heads to the Indo-Pacific
    • Leaders also expected to discuss the importance of growth and free trade for economic and national security

    The UK is set to deepen defence and security ties with New Zealand as the Prime Minster strengthens alliances abroad to protect Britain’s national interest.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer will host New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon this morning, with the leaders visiting the training of Ukrainian forces by the UK and New Zealand military as part of Operation Interflex. The visit follows the two leaders meeting at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa last year.

    New Zealand trainers have worked alongside British counterparts to help train more than 54,000 soldiers on Operation Interflex, and New Zealand are expected to today confirm that they will extend their support for the initiative in the UK until the end of the year.

    In addition to their support for training Ukrainian troops, military planners from the New Zealand Defence Force are contributing to the latest thinking and plans for post-conflict support for Ukraine through the Coalition of the Willing.

    Prime Minister Starmer will also announce UK contracts worth £30m for drones produced by SYOS Aerospace, a New Zealand uncrewed vehicle manufacturer based in Hampshire to support Ukraine.

    The contract has created 45 jobs at the manufacturing facility based in Fareham, Hampshire, and supports a further nine UK based companies with subcontracts – delivering on the government’s Plan for Change through both growth and security.

    During the visit to see the training first hand, the leaders are expected to discuss plans to further step up defence and security cooperation, with defence ministers being instructed to work on a new joint defence partnership between both countries to ensure the relationship is fit for the twenty-first century.

    The new arrangement, which will succeed the one signed in 2015, comes after both the UK and New Zealand increased defence spending to 2.5% and 2% of GDP respectively. It will also recognise the vital partnership between the UK and New Zealand in upholding stability and security across Europe, the Middle East and the Indo-Pacific.

    That includes through the involvement of Royal New Zealand Navy frigate, HMNZS Te Kaha, which will join the UK Carrier Strike Group, which leaves Portsmouth today, in the Indian Ocean.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said:

    “Only by working with our friends and allies and protecting our national security will we be able to deliver on our Plan for Change, putting money back in the pockets of working people through highly skilled jobs – such as those we have announced today – a strong and resilient economy, and greater opportunity.

    “From the beaches of Gallipoli, to the vital work we have been doing together on Operation Interflex and our support for Ukraine, the UK and New Zealand have stood shoulder-to-shoulder for generations in pursuit of peace and stability.

    “As the world becomes an increasingly dangerous place, I am proud how much we are doing together to support our national and economic security – stepping up our defence spending, deploying our navies together in the Indo-Pacific, and continuing our work to put Ukraine in the strongest possible position to deter an increasingly aggressive Russia.”

    Following the visit to Interflex training in the South West of England, the leaders will return to Downing Street to discuss how both countries can work together to drive growth, deliver on the government’s Plan for Change, and put money back in the pockets of working people.

    That will include increasing ambition on free and open trade, including through the global Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership and New Zealand and the UK’s landmark Free Trade Agreement.

    Total trade in goods and services between the UK and New Zealand was £3.6 billion in 12 months to September 2024 an increase of 5.3%, or £179 million in current prices, from 12 months leading up to September 2023. 

    It comes after Scottish firm Emergency One won a global competition to supply emergency vehicles to Fire and Emergency New Zealand (FENZ). Through the ten-year contract, East Ayrshire based Emergency One will replace 186 vehicles for New Zealand’s first responders, supporting 25 new jobs in Scotland.

    The UK and New Zealand are also deepening collaboration in the agriculture technology sector. A new Investor Partnership deal will see New Zealand investment in British small and medium enterprises to develop cutting edge equipment supporting growth, farming sustainability and food security.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 21 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: How InteroSoft Is Protecting UK Crypto Portfolios with 24/7 AI Monitoring

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    London, UK, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — In a time where market volatility and cyber threats are increasing daily, UK investors are demanding more than just speed and convenience—they’re demanding protection. InteroSoft, a fast-growing crypto trading platform, is answering that call with the launch of its 24/7 AI Monitoring System, a real-time security and risk management feature now active across all client accounts.

    This development marks a significant leap forward for crypto traders in the UK, many of whom have long faced the consequences of unmonitored trades, price crashes, and system failures. Now, thanks to InteroSoft’s AI-driven infrastructure, clients can rest easier knowing their portfolios are being actively protected around the clock.

    The move has triggered a wave of positive InteroSoft reviews, with users praising the platform’s ability to anticipate risk, flag dangerous trades, and even prevent losses before they happen.

    A New Standard in Crypto Protection

    InteroSoft’s AI Monitoring System uses proprietary algorithms to analyze thousands of market data points per second. It scans for volatility spikes, abnormal trading behavior, execution errors, and potential threats—all in real time.

    When something suspicious is detected, the AI can:

    • Freeze trade execution
    • Alert the client via mobile and web notifications
    • Automatically rebalance risk exposure
    • Pause or reverse open positions based on custom parameters

    “Our UK clients want speed—but they also want safety,” said a spokesperson for the company. “That’s why we built this system. InteroSoft isn’t just fast—it’s smart. We believe every trader, from beginners to professionals, deserves peace of mind.”

    Designed for UK Investors

    The system has been optimised for the UK market, ensuring full compatibility with local trading behavior, GBP pairings, and compliance expectations.

    Highlights include:

    • 24/7 AI trade monitoring across all accounts
    • Same-day GBP withdrawals
    • AI alerts tailored to UK trading patterns
    • London-based support for immediate assistance
    • Full transparency on fees, trades, and flagged actions

    As one of the only platforms offering this level of intelligent portfolio defense, InteroSoft is gaining rapid traction across London, Birmingham, Manchester, and beyond. The rise in InteroSoft reviews reflects growing user confidence and satisfaction.

    Real UK Traders. Real Results.

    Below are four testimonials from active UK-based clients who have experienced the impact of InteroSoft’s 24/7 AI Monitoring firsthand:

    Laura P. – London, England
    “I used to wake up in panic during overnight volatility. Since switching to InteroSoft, I don’t stress. The system caught a bad trade forming during a BTC flash crash and saved me thousands. I’ve left InteroSoft reviews because this tech really works.”

    Callum R. – Manchester, England
    “What impressed me was the automation. The AI paused one of my trades when the market shifted rapidly, and it explained why. That’s something I never got from other platforms. It’s like having a risk analyst working with you 24/7.”

    Hannah G. – Birmingham, England
    “I’ve tried five different crypto platforms. This is the first one where I genuinely feel protected. InteroSoft’s AI alerts helped me avoid three bad trades in two weeks. I’ve already recommended it to three friends.”

    James M. – Glasgow, Scotland
    “The AI doesn’t just watch the markets—it watches your behavior too. It flagged one of my emotional entries and asked me to confirm. That moment alone changed the way I trade. You’ll see my InteroSoft reviews because I believe people need to hear about this.”

    Analysts Take Notice

    A top UK fintech research firm recently reported that over 70% of new UK crypto investors are prioritising security and automation over bonuses and flashy interfaces. InteroSoft’s approach aligns perfectly with this trend, offering a balance of advanced tech, fast execution, and proactive protection.

    The company’s growth in Q1 2025 has been driven in part by demand for platforms that don’t just facilitate trades—but actively protect capital in real time. These trends are reflected in the surge of verified InteroSoft reviews across forums, blogs, and trust platforms.

    What’s Next for InteroSoft?

    Following the success of its AI Monitoring launch, InteroSoft has announced upcoming features specifically for its UK clients:

    • AI-driven tax summaries for HMRC reporting
    • Portfolio risk grading to assist with self-managed strategies
    • Mobile app upgrades for deeper trade visibility
    • Live market education streams from UK-based analysts

    These additions are set to reinforce the company’s reputation as one of the most forward-thinking crypto platforms in the UK market.

    Conclusion

    In an industry where milliseconds and mistakes can cost fortunes, InteroSoft is showing the UK that crypto trading can be both profitable and protected. With its 24/7 AI Monitoring System, same-day GBP access, and transparent operations, the platform is quickly becoming the smart trader’s first choice.

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: CFTC Staff Seek Public Comment Regarding Perpetual Contracts in Derivatives Markets

    Source: US Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Divisions of Market Oversight, Clearing and Risk, and Market Participants today issued a Request for Comment to better inform them on the potential uses, benefits, and risks of perpetual contracts in the derivatives markets the CFTC regulates (“Perpetual Derivatives”). 
    “Innovation and new technology has created a renaissance in markets that presents new opportunities that are accessible to more people, as well as risks,” said Acting Chairman Caroline D. Pham. “The CFTC is getting back to basics by requesting public comment on perpetual contracts that have seen significant interest recently from exchanges and market participants.”
    This request seeks comment on the characteristics of perpetual derivatives, including those characteristics which may differ across products. as well as the implications of their use in trading, clearing and risk management. The request also seeks comment on the risks of perpetual derivatives, including risks related to the areas of market integrity, customer protection, or retail trading. 
    Comments will be accepted until May 21. Comments may be submitted electronically through the CFTC Comments online process.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: VALUE LINE, INC. DIVIDEND HAS JUST BEEN RAISED FROM $1.20 TO $1.30 (ANNUALIZED) – ITS 11TH CONSECUTIVE INCREASE

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    New York, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Value Line, Inc. (NASDAQ – VALU) announced today that its Board of Directors has just raised its quarterly dividend, which will be $0.325 per common share ($1.30 annualized). The new higher cash dividend is payable on May 12, 2025 to stockholders of record on April 28, 2025. The increase of 8.3% is the 11th consecutive yearly increase in Value Line’s dividend.

    Value Line is a leading provider of investment research. The Value Line Investment Survey is one of the most widely used sources of independent equity research.

    Value Line publishes proprietary investment research in separate print and digital formats.

    Value Line provides these specialized services:
    a. Value Line Select – Each month, Value Line analysts recommend the one exceptional stock with superior profit potential and a favorable risk/reward ratio.
    b. The Value Line Special Situations Service – Each month, Value Line analysts recommend small and mid-cap stocks that hold the potential to transform your portfolio by delivering returns that are well above the market average.
    c. Value Line Select ETFs – Each month, Value Line analysts sift through the myriad investment possibilities to identify the one exchange traded fund that appears best positioned to outperform the market.
    d. Value Line Select: Dividend Income & Growth – Each month Value Line analysts make two stock recommendations that are expected to provide above-average current income along with appealing long-term dividend growth prospects.
    e. The New Value Line ETFs Service – includes data, information, and analysis on more than 2,800 exchange-traded funds (ETFs), to help subscribers select the best fit for their portfolios.
    f. The Value Line M&A Service – Value Line analysts highlight one company each month that is a candidate to be acquired by a larger entity at a material premium to the current stock price.
    g. Value Line Information You Should Know wealth newsletter – Value Line focuses on financial planning and investment issues that matter for today’s investor.
    h. The Value Line Climate Change Investing Service – Value Line analysts target a critical issue – climate change, which is expected to spur transformation in the global economy for decades to come
    i. Certain Value Line copyrights distributed under agreements including proprietary ranking system information and other information used in 3rd party products
    j. The Value Line Options Survey – information and ranks on more than 600,000 options on stocks covering 90% of the market.
    k. The Value Line Fund Adviser Plus – covers 20,000 funds, grouped into more than 30 Investment Objective Categories. Our proprietary Ranking System makes it simple to tell whether or not a particular fund is a worthwhile investment. Our approach helps to ensure that investors avoid funds with unsustainable short-term performance, and you can count on our Safety ™ rank to help manage your risk. Our professionally selected Model Portfolio names the best Exchange-Traded funds in eight key categories.
    l. The Value Line Investment Survey–Small& Mid Cap – print and digital financial information and quantitative analysis on approximately 1,800 companies with market capitalizations of less than $10 billion.
    m. The Value Line 600 – in-depth, independent print research on 600 large and prominent companies
    n. The Value Line Investment Survey–Selection & Opinion – Value Line’s weekly economic and stock market commentary, four Model Portfolios, which are actively managed, updated each week, and always contain 20 equities each.
    o. The Value Line Investment Survey–Smart Investor – a digital service providing investment research covering large, mid and small-cap stocks comprising about 90% of the total U.S. stock market
    p. The Value Line Investment Survey–Small Cap Investor – digital financial information and quantitative analysis on approximately 1,800 companies with market capitalizations of less than $10 billion
    q. The Value Line Investment Survey–Savvy Investor – a digital package covering more than 3,000 large, mid and small-cap stocks
    r. The Value Line Investment Survey–Investor 900 – this digital service provides investment research on 600 of the largest cap stocks plus 300 small- and mid-cap stocks
    s. The Value Line Investment Survey–Investor 600 – In-depth, independent digital research on 600 large and prominent companies
    t. The Value Line Investment Survey–Investor 2400 – This digital service provides investment research for 600 of the largest cap stocks plus approximately 1,800 small and mid-cap stocks
    u. The Value Line Investment Analyzer – This digital only service covers large, mid and small cap stocks comprising about 90% of the U.S. stock market
    v. Value Line Investment Analyzer Plus – a digital service that provides complete stock analysis for approximately 6,000 equities
    w. Value Line Research Center – A complete, online investment research system that includes all the financial information and tools needed to structure a well-researched and diversified portfolio for stocks, ETFs and mutual funds
    x. Value Line Equity Research Center – A complete, online investment research system that includes all of Value Line’s equity research products needed to structure a well-researched and diversified portfolio for equities

    Value Line’s products are available to individual investors by mail, at www.valueline.com or by calling 1-800-VALUELINE (1-800-825-8354).

    Institutional services for professional investors, advisors, corporate, academic, and municipal libraries are offered at www.ValueLinePro.com, www.ValueLineLibrary.com and by calling 1-800-531-1425.

    Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
    In this report, “Value Line,” “we,” “us,” “our” refers to Value Line, Inc. and “the Company” refers to Value Line and its subsidiaries unless the context otherwise requires.

    This report contains statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions (including certain projections and business trends) accompanied by such phrases as “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “will”, “intend” and other similar or negative expressions, that are “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. Actual results for Value Line, Inc. (“Value Line” or “the Company”) may differ materially from those projected as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the following:

    • maintaining revenue from subscriptions for the Company’s digital and print published products;
    • changes in investment trends and economic conditions, including global financial issues;
    • changes in Federal Reserve policies affecting interest rates and liquidity along with resulting effects on equity markets;
    • stability of the banking system, including the success of U.S. government policies and actions in regard to banks with liquidity or capital issues, along with the associated impact on equity markets;
    • continuation of orderly markets for equities and corporate and governmental debt securities;
    • problems protecting intellectual property rights in Company methods and trademarks;
    • problems protecting confidential information including customer confidential or personal information that we may possess;
    • dependence on non-voting revenues and non-voting profits interests in EULAV Asset Management, a Delaware statutory trust (“EAM” or “EAM Trust”), which serves as the investment advisor to the Value Line Funds and engages in related distribution, marketing and administrative services;
    • fluctuations in EAM’s and third-party copyright assets under management due to broadly based changes in the values of equity and debt securities, market sector variations, redemptions by investors and other factors;
    • possible changes in the valuation of EAM’s intangible assets from time to time;
    • possible changes in future revenues or collection of receivables from significant customers;
    • dependence on key executive and specialist personnel;
    • risks associated with the outsourcing of certain functions, technical facilities, and operations, including in some instances outside the U.S.;
    • risks of increased tariffs and other restrictions affecting the cost and availability of materials, equipment, and other necessary inputs to the Company’s operations;
    • competition in the fields of publishing, copyright and investment management, along with associated effects on the level and structure of prices and fees, and the mix of services delivered;
    • the impact of government regulation on the Company’s and EAM’s businesses;
    • federal and/or state legislative changes that might affect Value Line’s business;
    • the availability of free or low cost investment information through discount brokers or generally over the internet;
    • the economic and other impacts of global political and military conflicts;
    • continued availability of generally dependable energy supplies and transportation facilities in the geographic areas in which the company and certain suppliers operate;
    • terrorist attacks, cyber attacks and natural disasters;
    • the need for changes in our business plans because of unexpected events that occur;
    • widespread illnesses which may drastically affect markets, employment, and other economic conditions, and may have additional unpredictable impacts on employees, suppliers, customers, and operations;
    • changes in prices and availability of materials and other inputs and services, such as freight and postage, required by the Company;
    • risk of inadequacy of our insurance coverage to compensate for potential losses;
    • potential impact of vendors’ consolidation;
    • other risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the risks described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 30, 2024 and in Part II, Item 1A of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended January 31, 2025; and other risks and uncertainties arising from time to time.

    These factors are not necessarily all of the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any of our forward-looking statements. Other unknown or unpredictable factors which may involve external factors over which we may have no control could also have material adverse effects on future results. Likewise, changes we make in our plans, objectives, strategies, or intentions, which may occur at any time in our discretion, could also have material favorable or adverse effects on our future results. Except as otherwise required to be disclosed in periodic reports required to be filed by public companies with the SEC pursuant to the SEC’s rules, we have no duty to update these statements, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks and uncertainties, current plans, anticipated actions, and future financial conditions and results may differ from those expressed in any forward-looking information contained herein.

    Contact: Howard A. Brecher                                         
    Value Line, Inc.
    212-907-1500

    www.valueline.com
    www.ValueLinePro.com, www.ValueLineLibrary.com
    Facebook | LinkedIn | Twitter
    Complimentary Value Line® Reports on Dow 30 Stocks

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Promoting Work Zone Safety Statewide

    Source: US State of New York

    overnor Kathy Hochul is promoting work zone safety by urging all drivers to slow down, stay alert and follow New York State’s Move Over Law to protect roadside workers and other motorists. As construction season kicks into high gear statewide, these efforts highlight National Work Zone Awareness Week — which is celebrated from April 21-25, 2025 — and the national theme: “Respect the zone so we all get home.”

    “Every roadside worker deserves to return home safely at the end of their shift,” Governor Hochul said. “We’re asking all drivers to do their part by reducing speed, eliminating distractions and staying vigilant in work zones so that our hard-working and dedicated roadside workers are safe. A few extra seconds of your time and attention can save a life.”

    In 2024, there were more than 156 crashes in Thruway work zones resulting in one fatality and 30 injuries. Distracted driving, following too closely, an unsafe lane change or disregarding traffic warning signs caused the majority of the crashes. In addition, two Thruway Authority employees died and another was seriously injured in separate incidents while working on the New York State Thruway. In its 70-plus year history, 22 Thruway employees have been killed while on the job.

    In 2024, there were 322 intrusions in New York State Department of Transportation (NYSDOT) work zones. These intrusions resulted in the deaths of two drivers who entered the work zones and 138 additional injuries to highway workers and the traveling public. A total of 58 members of the NYSDOT family have died on the job across New York State, dating as far back as 1939.

    Throughout National Work Zone Awareness Week, the New York State Thruway Authority and NYSDOT will be hosting awareness events, lighting digital highway signs with safety messages and sharing important safety reminders on social media platforms. In addition — at the direction of Governor Hochul — State landmarks will be illuminated in orange on Wednesday, April 23 in recognition of Go Orange Day. Drivers are encouraged to:

    • Slow down when approaching work zones.
    • Move over for all stopped vehicles including roadside workers, emergency responders and disabled vehicles.
    • Stay off phones and avoid other distractions while driving.
    • Follow posted signs and flagger instructions.

    This April also marks two years since the launch of the Automated Work Zone Speed Enforcement (AWZSE) pilot program. The pilot program was established by legislation enacted into law by Governor Hochul in 2021 which authorized a five-year pilot program run as a joint effort by NYSDOT and the Thruway Authority to enhance the State’s ongoing efforts to slow motorists down in work zones and make New York’s highways safer.

    More than 425,000 Notices of Liability have been issued statewide, with over 38,000 repeat offenders since the AWZSE program began issuing Notices of Liability in May 2023. In locations where the cameras have been present more than once, fewer Notices of Liability are being issued, meaning that people are slowing down when cameras are present.

    Fines through the pilot program are issued as follows:

    • First Notice of Liability: $50 fine
    • Second Notice of Liability: $75 fine if within an 18-month period of first violation
    • Third and Subsequent Notices of Liability: $100 fine if within an 18-month period of first violation

    To further protect the workers who build and maintain roads and bridges, Governor Hochul proposed making the AWZSE pilot program permanent and increasing penalties for repeat violators in her Fiscal Year 2026 Executive Budget, in addition to expanding the program to include Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) Bridges and Tunnels and New York State Bridge Authority properties. Additionally, the Governor suggested enhancing penalties for assaults against transportation workers, extending protections similar to those provided to many MTA and retail workers. These actions will improve safety for both workers and drivers.

    Beginning with National Work Zone Awareness Week and continuing through the construction season, the New York State Police and local law enforcement agencies will once again be conducting “Operation Hardhat” details to enforce vehicle and traffic laws in highway work zones. Under “Operation Hardhat,” State Troopers or local police officers are dressed as highway maintenance workers in active NYSDOT or Thruway work zones across New York, identifying and citing motorists for several violations, including disobeying flagging personnel, speeding through work zones, cell phone and seatbelt use, and/or violations of the State’s Move Over law. Last year 2,755 tickets were issued by State Police and participating law enforcement agencies during 62 deployments across the State.

    The New York State Department of Transportation and Thruway Authority have produced new videos encouraging motorists to move over in work zones. See the NYSDOT video here and Thruway Authority video here.

    To celebrate “Go Orange Day” and to commemorate National Work Zone Awareness Week, the following New York State landmarks will be lit orange on Wednesday, April 23:

    • Governor Mario M. Cuomo Bridge
    • Kosciuszko Bridge
    • The H. Carl McCall SUNY Building
    • State Education Building
    • Alfred E. Smith State Office Building
    • Empire State Plaza
    • State Fairgrounds – Main Gate & Expo Center
    • Niagara Falls
    • The “Franklin D. Roosevelt” Mid-Hudson Bridge
    • Albany International Airport Gateway
    • MTA LIRR – East End Gateway at Penn Station
    • Fairport Lift Bridge over the Erie Canal
    • Moynihan Train Hall

    The New York State Bridge Authority (NYSBA) is observing Work Zone Awareness Week by conducting a “road show” at each of its five vehicular spans. Each day will consist of a meeting with staff, followed by a meeting with local stakeholders and first responders to discuss safety concerns, explore opportunities for collaboration, and share information about NYSBA’s upcoming construction season. Additionally, the necklace lights on the Mid-Hudson Bridge will be illuminated in orange in honor of “Go Orange Day” to promote work zone safety.

    New York State Thruway Authority Executive Director Frank G. Hoare said, “Each day, roadside workers risk their lives to enhance the safety of the roads we all rely on. It’s everyone’s responsibility to ensure they can perform their jobs safely and return to their families after their shifts. Drivers need to remain alert and reduce their speed in work zones. Let’s show our appreciation for the dedicated men and women who keep our roads operating safely.”

    New York State Department of Transportation Commissioner Marie Therese Dominguez said, “Our dedicated highway maintenance and construction workers routinely work in hazardous conditions so that the rest of us can get where we need to go, safely. They have families, friends and loved ones who love them and depend on them. We owe them all a debt of gratitude and paying back that debt begins with keeping them safe. I appreciate Governor Hochul’s continuing efforts to protect our workers so remember, every driver has a role to play — during National Work Zone Awareness Week and throughout the year – that is why I urge all motorists to put down your phones, slow down, and pay attention, especially in work zones. Lives are at stake.”

    New York State Bridge Authority Executive Director Dr. Minosca Alcantara said, “This week serves as an important reminder that work zone safety is a shared responsibility for everyone who travels on our state’s roadways. In recognition of this, the Bridge Authority is bringing together staff and local leaders at each of our five vehicular bridges to reinforce our partnerships and collective commitment to protecting employees working in construction zones. By remaining vigilant and looking out for our work crews, we help ensure that our staff return home safely to their loved ones—and that all travelers experience a safer journey.”

    New York State Police Superintendent Steven G. James said, “Highway workers, law enforcement officers and other emergency responders, work in a dangerous environment and risk their lives to keep the traveling public safe. They should be able to do their jobs without fear of harm and go home to their families at the end of each workday. It is important that motorists are aware of their responsibility to slow down, move over and put electronic devices away.”

    New York State Department of Motor Vehicles Commissioner and Chair of the Governor’s Traffic Safety Committee Mark J.F. Schroeder said, “As someone who spends a lot of time on the road driving across New York, I cannot understate my appreciation for the men and women who work to maintain the safety of those roads. We must all mind the rules of the road, and especially the rules of the work zone, to ensure that everyone on both sides of the cones and barricades are safe at all times.”

    State Senator Jeremy Cooney said, “This National Work Zone Awareness Week is a reminder for drivers to slow down, drive safely, and obey the rules of the road. Our highway employees work hard every day to improve our roads and get drivers where they need to go, and it’s only right that we work to keep them safe while on the job. I’m grateful to Governor Hochul, the Thruway Authority and NYSDOT for their continued partnership to keep all New Yorkers safe on the road.”

    Assemblymember William B. Magnarelli said, “Work Zone safety continues to be a priority for me as Chair of the Transportation Committee. In 2021, I was proud to sponsor and get passed into law legislation creating a pilot program for the use of speed cameras in work zones. There is no excuse for speeding and reckless driving in work zones. Our workers deserve a safe working environment and to safely go home to their families at the end of their shifts.”

    Associated General Contractors of New York State President and CEO Mike Elmendorf said, “Work zone safety isn’t just a one-week concern—it’s a year-round priority. As construction season ramps up, we urge all drivers: stay alert, slow down, and move over in work zones. Every day, highway workers and flaggers face serious risks from speeding and distracted drivers. That’s why New York’s work zone speed camera program is critical — it saves lives and must be made permanent and expanded. The recent rise in assaults on transportation workers makes it even more urgent to strengthen legal protections for those building and maintaining our infrastructure. AGC NYS is proud to partner with Governor Hochul and NYSDOT to create safer roads for workers and drivers alike. We applaud the Governor’s Executive Budget proposals to make the speed camera program permanent and close legal loopholes that leave workers vulnerable. Now, the Legislature must act to protect the men and women who keep New York moving.”

    New York State American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations President Mario Cliento said, “In just a few days, we will mark Workers Memorial Day to honor those who lost their lives on the job. As leaders move closer to finalizing the state budget, we have a unique opportunity to improve worker safety with new work zone protections and traffic laws. No worker should fear for their life while performing their job, and no family should have to grieve the loss of a loved one due to preventable and entirely avoidable roadway incidents. We thank Governor Hochul for prioritizing worker safety, and we look forward to working with her on protecting the workforce that keeps our roads safe.”

    New York State Building and Construction Trades Council President Gary LaBarbera said, “Construction sites are inherently dangerous and the added hazards and less-controllable variants of roadways and high speed traffic only increase the risks for worksites on our highways. This is why we must continue to encourage drivers to proceed with more caution and mindfulness around roadway work zones. We applaud Governor Hochul for her ongoing leadership and action on this important issue. Every hard-working New Yorker, including our brave tradesmen and tradeswomen working on our roadways, deserve to return home safely to their families at the end of each shift.”

    Laborers’ International Union of North America Vice President and New England Regional Manager Donato A. Bianco, Jr. said, “National Work Zone Awareness Week serves as an important reminder to everyone traveling our highways to slow down, stay alert and respect the men and women who perform this necessary and inherently dangerous work. Every day, LIUNA members build, repair and maintain the roads we drive to our jobs and back home to our families. It is because of these workers that our commutes are safer and more efficient. We all owe it to them to prioritize their safety and ensure they also return home to their loved ones at the end of their workday.”

    New York State Laborers Health and Safety Trust Fund Executive Director Frank Marchese, Jr. said, “National Work Zone Awareness Week is an important initiative that calls attention to the perils of road construction, and why driver attentiveness is imperative all year round. The data shows that prioritizing work zone safety legislation and initiatives creates a far less hazardous environment for workers simply doing their jobs by reducing speeding and distracted driving. Our union calls on everyone to do their part to keep workers safe, and show support for those who keep New York State moving forward.”

    New York State Conference of Operating Engineers President Thomas A. Callahan said, “Our members work hard building and repairing New York’s roads and bridges. That dangerous work becomes deadly with reckless and careless drivers. That’s why we urge the Legislature and the Governor to pass a budget that includes speed cameras in work zones legislation in addition to other safety measures.”

    Civil Service Employees Association Thruway Local 058 President Sean Kennedy said, “CSEA affirms our commitment to making sure all of our members make it home at the end of the work day. Drivers need to do their part too.”

    Civil Service Employees Association President Mary E. Sullivan said, “Our union joins Governor Hochul, the New York State Department of Transportation and the New York State Thruway Authority in observing National Work Zone Awareness Week from April 21 to April 25. As road work season begins, we want to once again highlight the importance of safe driving in highway work zones. This year, we observe this week remembering our union brother Stephen Ebling, who lost his life while working in a Thruway work zone. As motorists, we must always use caution while in work zones; respect the zone so we can all get home.”

    New York State Public Employees Federation President Wayne Spence said, “The 54,000 members of the New York State Public Employees Federation, especially the hardworking professionals at the NYS Department of Transportation, urge all New Yorkers to stay aware, on task and use caution when driving through highway work zones. As we enter National Work Zone Awareness Week, April 21-25, 2025, all New Yorkers should all be mindful that our highway workers have families that need them. In 2024 alone, there were more than 156 crashes in Thruway work zones resulting in one fatality and 30 injuries. Unfortunately, the vast majority of these accidents were entirely preventable if the drivers had focused on operating their vehicles and maintained appropriate work zone speeds — distracted driving and operator error were responsible for the vast majority of these crashes. PEF urges all motorists to pay attention and respect our highway work zones so all these dedicated workers can get home safely to their families.”

    Teamsters Local 456 President and Principal Officer Louis A. Picani said, “National Work Zone Awareness Week is a crucial time to reflect on the safety of our workers and the public. One of Teamsters Local 456’s objectives is to maintain the safety and well-being of our members. We support our partners in state government in enforcing stringent safety measures to protect those who build and maintain our roads. Local 456 not only represents the New York State Thruway workers, whose lives are in danger every day, but also the construction workers who are out fixing and maintaining roadways for those who travel them every day. We extend our heartfelt thanks to Governor Hochul for her unwavering support and commitment to enhancing work zone safety. Together, we can ensure that every work zone is a safe zone.”

    Safety is a shared responsibility. By working together, we can reduce accidents and ensure safer roads for workers and drivers alike.

    For more information on National Work Zone Awareness Week and how to stay safe while driving through work zones, visit the state’s comprehensive website at ny.gov/workzone.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Miami Executive Pleads Guilty to Massive Fraud Scheme

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    Earlier today, in federal court in Brooklyn, Pushpesh Kumar Baid, also known as “PK Jain,” pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit wire fraud in connection with a scheme to defraud investors in Tradepay Capital LLC (Tradepay), a purported factoring company.  The proceeding was held before United States Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom.  When sentenced, Baid faces a maximum sentence of 20 years’ imprisonment, as well as restitution of over $35 million and forfeiture of over $2.6 million.

    John J. Durham, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Christopher G. Raia, Assistant Director in Charge, Federal Bureau of Investigation, New York Field Office (FBI), announced the guilty plea.

    “Through a complex web of shell companies, straw bank accounts, fraudulent documents, and other lies, Baid and his co-conspirators deceived their victims into investing tens of millions of dollars into a business that did not exist,” stated United States Attorney Durham.  “Today’s plea demonstrates that my Office will hold accountable fraudsters like Baid who enrich themselves at their investors’ expense.”   

    Mr. Durham expressed his appreciation to the Internal Revenue Service, Criminal Investigations for its work on the case.

    As set forth in court filings, Baid was the business head of Tradepay, which purported to be an international factoring business run by an executive team experienced in factoring invoices in particular industries and geographic regions.  Factoring involves the sale of an invoice to a third party at a discount.  In a factoring transaction, the seller of an invoice obtains immediate funding from the buyer of the invoice, and the buyer of the invoice makes a profit when the invoice is paid in full.

    Between April 2017 and October 2019, Baid and his co-conspirators implemented a scheme to defraud investors in Tradepay by making it appear that Tradepay was a legitimate and successful business when it was, in fact, an elaborate scam.  For example, the hundreds of invoices from various businesses that Tradepay purported to be factoring were fraudulent and included fake signatures for both sides of the transactions.  Baid and his co-conspirators also funneled millions of dollars of investors’ funds—which they represented would be sent to Tradepay’s business partners—into a sprawling network of bank accounts that Baid controlled through shell entities and straw signatories.  From those accounts, Baid and his co-conspirators spent millions of dollars on personal expenses, including cash withdrawals and purchases of luxury cars and watches.  Baid even lied about his identity, concealing his real name from investors in order to obscure the fact that he was wanted for criminal offenses abroad.

    Investors in Tradepay initially received payments on the invoices, which led them to contribute increasingly large sums of capital.  By approximately July 2019, however, the payments on the invoices stopped, resulting in roughly $35 million in losses.

    As part of his plea, Baid also admitted to defrauding investors in Luxestreet Inc., formerly known as Asset Capital Partners LLC (Luxestreet), and agreed to pay restitution to Luxestreet’s investors.  Baid claimed that Luxestreet operated like a pawn shop for high end goods, including luxury watches.  In reality, Luxestreet contracts were forged and the physical watches held by the company were mere knockoffs.  

    The government’s case is being handled by the Office’s Business and Securities Fraud Section.  Assistant United States Attorneys Dylan A. Stern, Benjamin Weintraub, and Molly Delaney are in charge of the prosecution, with assistance from Paralegal Specialist Sarah Burn.

    The Defendant:

    Pushpesh Kumar Baid (also known as “PK Jain”)
    Age:  44
    Miami, Florida

    E.D.N.Y. Docket No. 21-CR-367 (DC)

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Zero Downtime, Full Transparency: UCFX Markets Raises the Industry Standard

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    London, UK, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — In a time when traders are demanding clarity, performance, and accountability, UCFX Markets has emerged as a beacon of trust, efficiency, and modern trading architecture. With its recent announcement of zero system downtime and full trade transparency, the platform is drawing praise from analysts, high-volume traders, and everyday investors alike.

    This dual milestone—infrastructure reliability and complete visibility into trades, pricing, and fees—has elevated UCFX Markets into a category of its own, especially as global platforms continue to suffer from lag, withdrawal delays, and policy confusion. As noted in a series of recent independent UCFXMarkets reviews, the company is delivering not just promises, but measurable performance.

    Technology That Doesn’t Sleep

    Since the beginning of 2025, UCFX Markets has achieved and maintained 100% operational uptime, a metric that few competitors can match. During major market events—including January’s unexpected altcoin surge and March’s Bitcoin correction—the platform experienced no outages or slowdowns, enabling traders to enter, manage, and exit positions in real time without risk of system-related loss.

    “Our clients never have to worry about platform failure during volatile conditions,” said a senior infrastructure engineer at UCFX Markets. “Whether they’re day-trading, swing-trading, or holding long-term, they know the system will be there. No blackout windows. No server crashes.”

    This commitment to consistency has sparked a surge in UCFXMarkets reviews, particularly from traders who have grown frustrated with unreliable platforms that freeze or disconnect during peak demand hours.

    Full Transparency: From Fees to Execution

    Beyond stability, UCFX Markets is also setting the bar for transparency. Clients now have access to:

    • Live trade audit logs
    • Real-time spread visibility
    • Instant fee breakdowns
    • AI-generated trade rationale reports

    This level of openness has resonated with both retail and professional traders, many of whom have spent years navigating platforms with hidden charges or unclear execution histories.

    “Transparency builds trust. And in 2025, trust is everything,” said a spokesperson for UCFX Markets. “We believe that traders deserve to see exactly how every trade is processed—and exactly what it costs.”

    According to one recent financial report, over 78% of new clients cited transparency and system stability as the key reasons for moving to the platform. This has led to an influx of glowing UCFXMarkets reviews from users across Europe, Australia, and Asia.

    What Traders Are Saying

    Below are four real-world testimonials from verified clients now actively trading with UCFX Markets:

    Liam H. – Manchester, UK
    “I’ve used at least six trading platforms in the past five years. None come close to the stability and transparency of UCFX Markets. I don’t have to guess what’s happening with my orders. Everything’s logged and clear. I’ve already written multiple UCFXMarkets reviews because they earned it.”

    Amelia W. – Sydney, Australia
    “During the last flash crash, my previous platform froze completely. I lost over $4,000. That’s when I switched to UCFX Markets. Their uptime is unmatched, and the risk monitoring tools helped me protect every position. Highly recommend.”

    Jonas L. – Berlin, Germany
    “As someone managing multiple accounts, transparency is non-negotiable. I’ve had platforms lock me out, delay withdrawals, or hide spreads. With UCFX Markets, it’s all laid out. Nothing hidden. My team and I now manage all of our trades here.”

    Rachel T. – Toronto, Canada
    “It’s the only platform I’ve used where everything works exactly as promised. From deposits to withdrawals to reporting—it’s seamless. I’ve shared UCFXMarkets reviews with friends and colleagues because people deserve better options in crypto trading.”

    The Industry Takes Notice

    UCFX Markets’ consistent execution and operational integrity have not gone unnoticed. Independent rating firms and fintech publications are beginning to highlight the platform as a rising force in crypto and forex, especially among self-managed traders, portfolio managers, and regulated institutional desks.

    The company is also gaining attention for its no-nonsense approach to compliance, offering streamlined KYC processes that meet international standards without unnecessary delays or hurdles. Combined with its real-time trade audit tools, UCFX Markets is positioning itself as a regulation-ready alternative for both individual and enterprise clients.

    Looking Ahead: Smarter, Safer, Faster

    UCFX Markets’ roadmap for 2025 includes:

    • Advanced AI-driven trade strategy modeling
    • Multilingual, around-the-clock support based in EU and APAC
    • Custom dashboard environments for fund managers and quant traders
    • Launch of smart trading alerts integrated with mobile apps

    These innovations are expected to further boost user satisfaction and enhance already glowing UCFXMarkets reviews seen across fintech communities and trust platforms.

    Conclusion

    In a market flooded with short-lived platforms and empty promises, UCFX Markets is raising the bar through performance, clarity, and total reliability. With zero downtime and fully transparent operations, it offers a clear path forward for traders who demand both trust and results.

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER: SAVE OUR SMALL BUSINESSES FROM TRUMP’S TARIFF WAR; STANDING AT ALBANY’S YONO’S RESTAURANT WITH CAPITAL REGION BUSINESSES THAT ARE SEEING MAJOR PRICE INCREASES HURTING FAMILIES & LOCAL JOBS,…

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer
    Albany’s Renowned Yono’s Restaurant Is In Panic Over Trump’s Tariffs That Threaten Their Business, And Small Businesses & Manufacturers In Capital Region Like Latham Pool Are Already Seeing Costs Spike From Trade War With Canada
    Senator Says 14,000 NY-ers In The Capital Region Work In Industries Directly Impacted By Tariffs, And Albany Families Could See Prices Rise Nearly $5,000 More A Year
    Schumer: We Need To Save Our Restaurants & Small Businesses From Trump’s Tariff War That Is Raising Prices And Killing Jobs
    To kickstart National Cost of Living Week of Action, with Trump’s tariff war hammering Albany’s restaurants and small businesses, U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer today stood at Albany’s renowned Yono’s Restaurant with Capital Region small business leaders who are feeling major hits to their bottom line due to tariffs. The senator said this chaotic, self-destructive tariff war has Upstate NY restaurants, local businesses, and working- and middle-class families footing the bill, with the average family in the Capital Region estimated to be hit with nearly $5,000 in higher prices per year.
    Schumer said every day this chaos continues it risks more than 14,000 jobs in the Capital Region in industries impacted by the tariffs and even more jobs in Upstate NY’s vital recreation and tourism industries. Schumer said enough is enough, and announced that when the Senate returns he will force a vote to end Trump’s trade war.
    “Albany and the Capital Region are on the frontlines of Trump’s destructive tariff war. Let’s be clear: these tariffs are a tax increase on Upstate NY. Family restaurants are the heart and soul of the Capital Region and the backbone of Main Streets across Upstate New York. They are still recovering from the pandemic. They can’t afford to eat price increases when Trump slaps them with tariffs and neither can their customers. Small businesses and manufacturers have already seen costs skyrocket, and some are being hit with a double whammy as tourism & business from Canada dries up from Trump’s actions. No small business or restaurant in Upstate NY or anywhere in America can operate with this kind of uncertainty,” said Senator Schumer. “We need to save our restaurants & small businesses from Trump’s tariff war. That’s why when the Senate returns, I will force a vote to end this reckless trade war. This is a vital ingredient to protect restaurants and families throughout the Capital Region and across Upstate New York.”
    Schumer explained Capital Region restaurants were already hit hard by the pandemic and many are still trying to recover. Schumer explained that restaurants operate on some of the slimmest margins – typically 3 to 5 percent – which could shrink more as tariffs go into effect. Since ingredients are perishable, restaurants don’t have the option of stockpiling materials and they can’t change suppliers on a whim. With the threat of tariffs looming, prices across the board have increased and restaurant owners are worried that customers can’t afford to go out to eat anymore. Without business, they might not be able to recover and would be forced to lay off staff, or worse, close their doors.
    A New York Times analysis found that over 14,000 New Yorkers across the Capital Region including 4,400 in Albany County work in industries targeted by Trump’s tariffs, which does not even account for all the related jobs, including in the tourism and recreation industries, that are also being impacted by the damage of this trade war. According to the Main Street Alliance, a network of small businesses, 81.5% of small business respondents to a recent survey indicated they would raise prices for consumers due to tariffs and 31.5% indicated they would lay off employees as a result of the increased costs from tariffs.
    The tariffs are also creating uncertainty for families and jobs and are expected to increase costs for the average American family by nearly $5,000 a year, while families are struggling to plan for the future without assurances about their jobs.
    Yono’s Restaurant has Indonesian influences and relies on spices and fruits that are not widely produced domestically, such as coconut milk, lemongrass, kaffir lime leaves, palm sugar, chilies, and galangal. Without knowing how much they will cost, it is impossible for Yono’s to plan its menu, which they often shift seasonally, and now they do not know which products they can maintain a consistent, affordable supply of. In addition, as the market has shifted to more takeout and delivery options, Yono’s has relied on imported containers and bags that are already more expensive and could get more expensive with tariffs in effect.
    The senator said unpredictability makes it difficult for local restaurants to plan for tomorrow, especially when they are already operating on such small margins. For example, when asked about catering orders, owners aren’t sure how to quote orders and are faced with the option of facing sky-high prices when planned events roll around, or even needing to turn down customers. These added challenges make it more difficult for small restaurants to survive against larger chain restaurants.
    “Here at Yono’s we support an immense amount of USA grown meats, vegetables, cheeses, beer, spirits and wine. However our guests appreciate a broad amount of options. We use coconut milk, lemongrass, kaffir lime leaves, palm sugar, chilies, galangal, and pandan. These items are not able to be grown in the USA, let alone in the amounts we need. We also import lamb from New Zealand and Australia. Of course, he biggest items imported that affect us will be coffee (99.5% of the coffee consumed in the USA is imported). We can only grow coffee in Hawaii in this county. Even our fine wine glasses come from Austria,” said Dominick Purnomo, of Yono’s Restaurant.
    Schumer added, “If this tariff war continues, it could devastate Upstate NY’s economy in ways we haven’t seen since the height of the pandemic. Our local restaurants and other small businesses are already operating on razor thin margins and now they’re being forced into difficult decisions, including if the increase in costs means they will need to raise prices for customers, lay off staff, or even close their business altogether. That is unacceptable.”
    “New York State restaurants have faced immense challenges in recent years. From the hardships caused by the COVID-19 pandemic to the soaring price increases driven by inflation and the rising cost of living, many restaurants have fought to stay afloat. The implementation of these new tariffs is yet another blow to an already struggling industry. Tariffs on food and beverages will place an additional strain on restaurants, ultimately leading to higher prices that will be passed on to consumers. Restaurants are not only a cornerstone of New York State’s economy but also serve as essential gathering places for communities to come together and enjoy each other’s company. Simply put, the tariffs are just an unnecessary burden on an industry barely hanging on. We urge the Administration to control consumer price increases as much as possible by exempting food and beverage items from future tariffs,” said Melissa Fleischut, President and CEO of the New York State Restaurant Association.
    Other businesses across industries are also facing uncertainty. Latham Pool, the largest designer, manufacturer, and marketer of in-ground residential swimming pools in North America, Australia, and New Zealand, has called the Capital Region its home for nearly 70 years. Latham Pool has 1,500 employees including 300 in New York State, mostly in the Capital Region. Tariffs on foreign goods – especially aluminum and steel – are impacting Latham Pool’s ability to serve its customers and his company along with so many others are deeply fearful of customers pulling back. We are already seeing these fears manifest across America as consumer confidence is cratering and is the lowest it has been in years due to tariffs.
    Latham Pool estimates that 15-20% of their materials are sourced from overseas and will be impacted by the tariffs. Worse, they are impacted by the devolving trade relationship with Canada, where the Canadian reciprocal tariff now disadvantages their products for sale in Canada, which has been a strong market for them.
    The whiplash and uncertainty over tariffs have also sent the economy into a tailspin. Trump previously delayed the start of his tariffs twice and canceled across-the-board tariffs six days after implementing them. Uncertainty is causing the stock market to fall, causing chaos for restaurants to operate, and shaking the job market.
    Schumer said the Senate has a plan to end this dangerous trade war and protect Upstate NY businesses. Earlier this month, the Senate passed a bipartisan resolution to end tariffs on Canada and urged the House to pass it as well. Schumer also said when the Senate returns, he will force a vote to reverse these new taxes of 10% on all imported goods and end the looming threat of additional tariffs of up to 49% on products Americans buy from other countries. Schumer said ending this costly trade war is key to protecting New York from price increases and job losses as a result of tariffs on Canada.
    Schumer concluded, “I am all for addressing trade imbalances—I have always been a China hawk and have long fought against unfair trade practices, but these sweeping, ill-conceived tariffs are creating chaos and undermining those goals. Rather than uniting the world against China, Trump has united them against us! No matter which way you slice it, costs are going to skyrocket for our local restaurants and consumers. If you’re in Upstate New York, you’ll feel it first, and worse than just about anywhere in the country. We need everyone, especially NY Republicans, to stand up against Trump’s senseless, job-killing, cost-increasing tax on Upstate New Yorkers.”
    When the Senate returns, it will vote on a bipartisan resolution that would terminate the emergency declared by Trump to authorize his global tariffs. If the resolution is enacted into law, the tariffs would be rescinded. The Senate also previously passed a bipartisan resolution terminating Trump’s national emergency that is justifying his destructive tariffs on Canada, which Schumer said the House needs to vote on. Schumer has been a vocal supporter of both resolutions.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: SCHUMER: SAVE OUR RESTAURANTS & SMALL BUSINESSES FROM TRUMP’S TARIFF WAR, STANDING WITH CENTRAL NY BUSINESSES SEEING MAJOR PRICE INCREASES HURTING FAMILIES & LOCAL JOBS, SENATOR ANNOUNCES SENATE DEMS…

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Charles E Schumer
    Syracuse’s Renowned Emerald Cocktail Kitchen Is In Panic Over Trump’s Tariffs That Threaten Their Business, And Small Businesses & Manufacturers Across Central NY Are Already Seeing Costs Spike From Trade War With Canada
    Senator Says 16,000 NY-ers In Central NY Work In Industries Directly Impacted By Tariffs, And Syracuse Families Could See Prices Rise Nearly $5,000 More A Year
    Schumer: We Need To Save Our Restaurants & Small Businesses From Trump’s Tariff War That Is Raising Prices And Killing Jobs
    To kickstart National Cost of Living Week of Action, with Trump’s tariff war hammering Syracuse’s restaurants and small businesses, U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer today stood at Syracuse’s renowned Emerald Cocktail Kitchen with Central NY small business leaders who are feeling major hits to their bottom line due to tariffs. The senator said this chaotic, self-destructive tariff war has Upstate NY restaurants, local businesses, and working- and middle-class families footing the bill, with the average family in Central NY estimated to be hit with nearly $5,000 in higher prices per year.
    Schumer said every day this chaos continues it risks more than 16,000 jobs in Central NY in industries impacted by the tariffs and even more jobs in Upstate NY’s vital recreation and tourism industries. Schumer said enough is enough, and announced that when the Senate returns he will force a vote to end Trump’s trade war.
    “Syracuse and Central New York are on the frontlines of Trump’s destructive tariff war. Let’s be clear: these tariffs are a tax increase on Upstate NY. Family restaurants are the heart and soul of Central New York and the backbone of Main Streets across Upstate New York. They are still recovering from the pandemic. They can’t afford to eat price increases when Trump slaps them with tariffs and neither can their customers. Small businesses and manufacturers have already seen costs skyrocket, and some are being hit with a double whammy as tourism & business from Canada dries up from Trump’s actions. No small business or restaurant in Upstate NY or anywhere in America can operate with this kind of uncertainty,” said Senator Schumer. “We need to save our restaurants & small businesses from Trump’s tariff war. That’s why when the Senate returns, I will force a vote to end this reckless trade war. This is a vital ingredient to protect restaurants and families throughout Central New York and across Upstate New York.”
    Schumer explained Central NY restaurants were already hit hard by the pandemic and many are still trying to recover. Schumer explained that restaurants operate on some of the slimmest margins – typically 3 to 5 percent – which could shrink more as tariffs go into effect. Since ingredients are perishable, restaurants don’t have the option of stockpiling materials and they can’t change suppliers on a whim. With the threat of tariffs looming, prices across the board have increased and restaurant owners are worried that customers can’t afford to go out to eat anymore. Without business, they might not be able to recover and would be forced to lay off staff, or worse, close their doors.
    A New York Times analysis found that over 16,000 New Yorkers across Central NY including 10,000 in Onondaga County work in industries targeted by Trump’s tariffs, which does not even account for all the related jobs, including in the tourism and recreation industries, that are also being impacted by the damage of this trade war. According to the Main Street Alliance, a network of small businesses, 81.5% of small business respondents to a recent survey indicated they would raise prices for consumers due to tariffs and 31.5% indicated they would lay off employees as a result of the increased costs from tariffs.
    The tariffs are also creating uncertainty for families and jobs and are expected to increase costs for the average American family by nearly $5,000 a year, while families are struggling to plan for the future without assurances about their jobs.
    At the Emerald Cocktail Kitchen, co-founded by local businesswomen Michelle and Nora Roesch, Trump’s tariffs have already begun to take root and are among the Roesch’s chief concerns moving forward, with some of their liquor and wine being imported from Canada and other countries. On the food side of the house, Emerald’s culinary experts use cheeses like feta and gouda, imported from Greece and the Netherlands, as key ingredients in their burgers, pizzas and salads. They also use fruits and other products imported from Canada and Mexico.
    In addition to the wide ranging impact that tariffs will have on Emerald Cocktail Kitchen’s menu, they are driving increased costs across the board, which in turn are driving down consumer discretionary spending. As a result, Emerald Cocktail Kitchen customers have started spending less money on an average visit and opting to save by skipping an appetizer or desert. With customers spending less, the business brings in less and employees receive less in tips on smaller checks. Altogether, Trump’s tariffs have left small businesses like Emerald Cocktail Kitchen exposed to significant impacts, uncertain about how to proceed, and uneasy about what could be next. 
    The senator said unpredictability makes it difficult for local restaurants to plan for tomorrow, especially when they are already operating on such small margins. For example, when asked about catering orders, owners aren’t sure how to quote orders and are faced with the option of facing sky-high prices when planned events roll around, or even needing to turn down customers. These added challenges make it more difficult for small restaurants to survive against larger chain restaurants.
    “Imported goods like tequila, gin, prosecco, Aperol, avocados, limes, feta, gouda, and more – all of which are staples behind our bar and in our kitchen – have surged in price as a result of recent United States tariff policy decisions. In Central New York, small businesses like ours depend on steady customer traffic and predictable costs to survive. Unfortunately, the administration’s back-and-forth approach to tariff implementation has made long-term planning feel impossible,” said Michelle Roesch, Co-owner of Emerald Cocktail Kitchen. “For small Syracuse businesses like ours, Trump’s tariffs have created the same kind of stress and uncertainty we felt during COVID – except this time, it’s self-inflicted. As a result, customers are watching their wallets, staff are taking home smaller tips, and we’ve had to cut back on bulk orders. We need trade policies that lift up small and local businesses, not weigh them down. That is why I am proud to stand in support of Senator Schumer as he fights to force a vote Trump’s trade war in support of small businesses here in Syracuse and all across Upstate NY.”
    Schumer added, “If this tariff war continues, it could devastate Upstate NY’s economy in ways we haven’t seen since the height of the pandemic. Our local restaurants and other small businesses are already operating on razor thin margins and now they’re being forced into difficult decisions, including if the increase in costs means they will need to raise prices for customers, lay off staff, or even close their business altogether. That is unacceptable.”
    Other businesses across industries are also facing uncertainty. In the City of Syracuse alone, tariffs are among the top concerns at restaurants and artisanal food shops like The Wedge and the Curd Nerd, veteran-owned businesses like Talking Cursive Brewing Company, and local food vendors like Firecracker Thai Kitchen at Salt City Market. Elsewhere in Central New York, 5th generation family and employee-owned northern hardwood lumber producer, Gutchess Lumber, and it’s 500 employee-owners are also bracing for negative impacts to their business.  
    In the North Country, Trump’s tariffs and trade war with Canada have already taken a toll on craft breweries like 1812 Brewing Company in Watertown, manufacturing companies like AmTech Yarns in Massena, and transportation authorities like the Ogdensburg Bridge & Port Authority. In addition, Alcoa, an aluminum producer based in the North Country, predicts tariffs will cost the company an additional $90 million this quarter alone.
    In the Mohawk Valley, local coffee shops like Character Coffee in the City of Utica, and trendy fast-casual restaurants like Laffa’s Mediterranean Grill in the Town of New Hartford have both started to feel the impact of tariffs.
    “New York State restaurants have faced immense challenges in recent years. From the hardships caused by the COVID-19 pandemic to the soaring price increases driven by inflation and the rising cost of living, many restaurants have fought to stay afloat. The implementation of these new tariffs is yet another blow to an already struggling industry. Tariffs on food and beverages will place an additional strain on restaurants, ultimately leading to higher prices that will be passed on to consumers. Restaurants are not only a cornerstone of New York State’s economy but also serve as essential gathering places for communities to come together and enjoy each other’s company. Simply put, the tariffs are just an unnecessary burden on an industry barely hanging on. We urge the Administration to control consumer price increases as much as possible by exempting food and beverage items from future tariffs,” said Melissa Fleischut, President and CEO of the New York State Restaurant Association.
    “At a small business like Firecracker Thai, we feel the impact of tariffs and increased costs on every single order and with every single purchase. We plan to increase menu prices by 10-15% to help offset rising costs, but our prices can only go so high before we risk pricing out customers. Unfortunately, our planned 10-15% increase is not enough to cover all of our increased costs, so the remainder will take a bite out of our bottom line,” said Sarah Tong-Ngork, Owner of Firecracker Thai Kitchen. “In addition, tariffs have made it more difficult to find authentic, imported ingredients like Jasmine Rice and Rice Noodles at local markets. After the devastating impact that COVID had on the food service industry, the last thing we need is to increase prices and disrupt supply chains. I would like to thank Senator Schumer for coming to Syracuse to fight for small businesses like Firecracker Thai and small business owners like me.”
    “As a small craft brewery in Central New York, Talking Cursive Brewing Company faces significant challenges due to tariffs. We rely on imported aluminum cans from Canada, as well as hops and grain from the EU, Australia, and New Zealand. These tariffs, coupled with their ripple effects on the global economy, have been compounded by other actions from the current administration that are reshaping travel, tourism, and consumer behavior. While we experienced a brief uptick in business at the end of 2024 and into January, February and March of this year have seen a sharp decline, with customer counts and sales dropping more than 25% year-over-year. This marks the first time in our seven years of operation that we’ve faced such a downturn in the first quarter,” said Andrew Brooks, Co-Owner of Talking Cursive Brewing Company. “Tourism is a vital part of our business, especially in the summer when 15-20% of our customers are tourists, including about 7% from Canada. Many Canadians I know that travel here often have expressed that they feel disrespected by the current administration, and no longer plan to visit the U.S. in the near future. This decline in tourism directly impacts the revenue of both our tasting room and accounts that we distribute to across New York, including several in the Thousands Islands Region that depend on Canadian tourists. We anticipate a significant loss of sales in that region and will need to reassess the viability of distributing there. I appreciate the efforts that Senator Schumer is taking to help support small businesses like ours during these challenging times.”
    “Over the last 24 month, 1812 Brewing Company has invested hundreds of man hours and significant capital to gain entry into the Ontario, Canada market.  Because of recently implemented tariffs, the Provincial Government of Ontario has put a stop on the purchase of all American-made craft beer, including our gold medal winning War of 1812 Amber Ale. This will immediately cut off around 10% of our sales,” said Thomas W. Scozzafava, Chairman & CEO of 1812 Brewing Company. “Although relatively small, 1812 Brewing Company and its employees will be hurt by an escalating Trade War with Canada, which could ultimately result in the loss of jobs in our local plant. I hope that those deciding these policies – on both sides of the aisle – understand the true human impact of sudden and dramatic changes to the parameters of trade with our Canadian partners. I thank Senator Schumer for sticking up for small businesses like 1812 and always fighting to protect New York State’s craft breweries.”
    “As the owner of Character Coffee in Utica, I rely on specialty roasters who are already feeling the impact of new tariffs. Coffee isn’t grown in the U.S. — so by design, our industry depends on farmers around the world. Even more concerning, these tariffs are piling onto an already fragile supply chain, strained by climate shifts and a year of poor harvests. It’s not just the coffee we have to worry about, but everything from cups and lids to delivery fees,” said Katie Aiello, Owner of Character Coffee. “When costs rise, customers pull back — starting with discretionary spending like grabbing a cup of coffee. The uncertainty is costly too. It’s hard to plan, price, or grow when every week brings new instability in the market. Independent cafes aren’t faceless corporations. We’re local businesses trying to offer good jobs, contribute to the community, and serve something meaningful. These tariffs threaten that. We urgently need thoughtful trade policy that protects American small businesses, and that is why I am proud to stand alongside Senator Schumer in Syracuse today to join in his fight for to safeguard locals businesses like mine.”
    “Since we opened in 2021, rising costs have been one of our biggest challenges, and we’ve had no choice but to pass some of that burden onto our customers just to stay open. With tariffs on the horizon, we’re already seeing price hikes on ingredients we depend on, like kalamata olives, tahini, and feta,” said Elias Zeina, Owner of Lafa Mediterranean. “It’s heartbreaking—we’re trying to protect our team and our guests, but I worry about how much more our customers can take. Small business owners like me are feeling squeezed, and our customers are the ones paying the price.
    The whiplash and uncertainty over tariffs have also sent the economy into a tailspin. Trump previously delayed the start of his tariffs twice and canceled across-the-board tariffs six days after implementing them. Uncertainty is causing the stock market to fall, causing chaos for restaurants to operate, and shaking the job market.
    Schumer said the Senate has a plan to end this dangerous trade war and protect Upstate NY businesses. Earlier this month, the Senate passed a bipartisan resolution to end tariffs on Canada and urged the House to pass it as well. Schumer also said when the Senate returns, he will force a vote to reverse these new taxes of 10% on all imported goods and end the looming threat of additional tariffs of up to 49% on products Americans buy from other countries. Schumer said ending this costly trade war is key to protecting New York from price increases and job losses as a result of tariffs on Canada.
    Schumer concluded, “I am all for addressing trade imbalances—I have always been a China hawk and have long fought against unfair trade practices, but these sweeping, ill-conceived tariffs are creating chaos and undermining those goals. Rather than uniting the world against China, Trump has united them against us! No matter which way you slice it, costs are going to skyrocket for our local restaurants and consumers. If you’re in Upstate New York, you’ll feel it first, and worse than just about anywhere in the country. We need everyone, especially NY Republicans, to stand up against Trump’s senseless, job-killing, cost-increasing tax on Upstate New Yorkers.”
    When the Senate returns, it will vote on a bipartisan resolution that would terminate the emergency declared by Trump to authorize his global tariffs. If the resolution is enacted into law, the tariffs would be rescinded. The Senate also previously passed a bipartisan resolution terminating Trump’s national emergency that is justifying his destructive tariffs on Canada, which Schumer said the House needs to vote on. Schumer has been a vocal supporter of both resolutions.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Prime Minister hosts the U.S. Vice President and family

    Source: Government of India

    Prime Minister hosts the U.S. Vice President and family

    PM recalls his successful visit to Washington D.C. in January and his discussions with President Trump

    Following up on their meeting in February this year in Paris, PM and Vice President Vance reviewed progress in bilateral relations

    They welcome progress in the India-U.S. Bilateral Trade Agreement and efforts towards enhancing cooperation in energy, defence, strategic technologies

    The two leaders exchange views on various regional and global issues of mutual interest

    PM extends best wishes to the Vice President and family for a pleasant stay

    PM conveys greetings to President Trump and looks forward to his visit to India later this year

    Posted On: 21 APR 2025 8:50PM by PIB Delhi

    Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi met with the Vice President of the United States of America, the Honorable J.D. Vance today, accompanied by the Second Lady Mrs. Usha Vance, their children, and senior members of the U.S. Administration. 

    Prime Minister fondly recalled his visit to Washington D.C. in January and his fruitful discussions with President Trump, which laid down the roadmap for close cooperation between India and the U.S., leveraging the strengths of Make America Great Again (MAGA) and Viksit Bharat 2047.

    Prime Minister and Vice President Vance reviewed and positively assessed the progress in various areas of bilateral cooperation. 

    They welcomed the significant progress in the negotiations for a mutually beneficial India-U.S. Bilateral Trade Agreement focused on the welfare of the people of the two countries. Likewise, they noted continued efforts towards enhancing cooperation in energy, defence, strategic technologies and other areas.

    The two leaders also exchanged views on various regional and global issues of mutual interest, and called for dialogue and diplomacy as the way forward.

    Prime Minister extended his best wishes to the Vice President, Second Lady and their children for a pleasant and productive stay in India.

    Prime Minister conveyed his warm greetings to President Trump and said that he looked forward to his visit to India later this year.

    ***

    MJPS/VJ/SKS

    (Release ID: 2123302) Visitor Counter : 250

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Salary.com Unveils Agentic AI Platform for HR and Compensation

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Thinks, Learns, and Acts based on Vast Amounts of Compensation and HR Data;
    Uncovers and Anticipates Trends and Creates New Efficiencies

    WALTHAM, Mass., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Salary.com, the global leader in compensation technology and data, today announced its agentic AI platform, the first of its kind designed specifically for HR and compensation teams. This platform leverages the power of Large Language Models (LLMs) and advanced agentic AI to automate complex HR and Compensation workflows, scale standard processes, and drive new efficiencies for Compensation and HR teams. By adding an AI platform to Salary.com’s sophisticated data foundation, HR and Compensation teams can dramatically streamline how quickly they get answers to a wide range of complex, previously time-consuming, and data-driven questions.

    While compensation has historically played a primary role in attracting and retaining top talent, its impact is fundamental to company culture, financial wellbeing, and employee engagement. Compensation remains one of the most complex functions in the HR category, necessitating accuracy, reliability, and close alignment between all functions in a company.

    “We are changing the game for HR and compensation management,” said Kent Plunkett, CEO of Salary.com. “For the first time, HR professionals can harness the power of Agentic AI to not only analyze vast amounts of compensation data but also anticipate trends, recommend strategic actions, and automate time-consuming processes. This is AI that doesn’t just assist —it thinks, learns, and acts in alignment with an organization’s compensation philosophy and business goals. Our customers rely on us as their trusted partner who keeps them competitive and provides support as they navigate an uncertain future and embrace AI.” Plunkett added, “Salary.com has been the leader in compensation technology for over 25 years. We’re once again blazing the path forward in compensation and HR Technology, making sure our customers can realize the full capabilities of AI as the technology advances.”

    Salary.com’s AI platform can instantly identify an organization’s top competitors for talent, analyze pay trends across industries, and recommend optimal pay mixes to retain key employees. Salary.com’s AI platform flexibility means HR and Compensation teams can also surface hidden job duplication, simulate job architecture adjustments, and calculate the financial impact of aligning to future minimum wage requirements.

    AI at Salary.com

    Salary.com has a long history in AI, known for producing innovative solutions to address real problems. For over 25 years, Salary.com has pioneered AI applications in compensation management while others were still learning the term. Over those years, Salary.com’s mission has never changed: deliver extraordinarily accurate compensation data, intelligence, and innovative software solutions that empower organizations to make fair, competitive, and strategic compensation decisions.

    Salary.com is committed to continuous innovation to address the critical challenges faced by HR and compensation teams. This AI platform delivers increased efficiency, lower operational costs, improved accuracy and reliability, actionable insights, compliance assurance, global scalability, and enhanced talent retention and optimization. By constantly advancing the platform, Salary.com is delivering new standards of operational efficiency and scale while maintaining the accuracy and reliability our customers expect.

    Real-World Impact: Salary.com Transforms Compensation

    Continuing its deep commitment to AI, Salary.com is revolutionizing compensation by providing both immediate answers and strategic foresight. Organizational growth strategies can be confidently advanced by quickly receiving answers to questions such as:

    • Market Intelligence & Competitive Benchmarking
      • Who am I competing against for critical talent in my markets and what is the pay mix to retain my existing talent?
      • Which of my competitors saw the largest increase in pay ranges over the past year, and for which positions?
      • What unique skills are my competitors looking for in those jobs that are critical to my organization? Which of these skills are we not considering, based on our own job descriptions?
      • If I updated all my survey sources to this year’s data, what would be the cost to adjust all pay to the new market reference point?
    • Pay Structure & Compliance Readiness
      • Show me what the minimum wage rates will be in 2026. Who will be below this limit and what is the cost to bring these employees to that minimum wage?
      • How many employees are paid below their salary range minimum and how much would it cost to correct these issues?
    • Job Architecture & Organizational Design
      • Where do we see potential job duplication in my organization? How should I adjust my job architecture or existing pay in response?
      • If I add a new job family to my Boston office, how would I design the pay mix and where would I assign these jobs to my salary structures?
      • Can you build out a job architecture with all my jobs and tell me where there are potential areas that need adjustments?
    • Pay Equity Analysis & Fairness
      • Which jobs in our organization should be clustered into similarly situated groups and which employees in those clusters are the pay equity outliers?
      • Provide a pay gap analysis separated by salary grade, EEO category/ and job level.

    Yong Zhang, President, COO and CRO of Salary.com, and the chief architect of this new AI platform, said, “Our customers demand tools that work. We made the conscious choice to skip building a simple generative AI tool for content retrieval and committed to build the next generation of AI technology: a true robust agentic AI technology platform that compensation and HR departments can customize and deploy to conduct deep analyses and gain operational efficiencies. By working like a trusted teammate as opposed to just another tool, Salary.com delivers everything customers need to get AI right – from standard and custom agent design to ongoing QA of AI outputs.”

    AI Your Way

    Salary.com’s AI platform is designed to support a company’s adoption of AI tools. The Salary.com team will build customized agents that map to specific business processes based on current workflows, provide guidance to help build AI-related skills, and work as an ongoing partner ready to adapt to changes in the AI landscape. The goal is to provide custom department-specific solutions that enable sustainable transformation.

    Availability & How to Learn More

    Salary.com’s Agentic AI will be demonstrated at the World at Work conference May 19 – May 21, 2025. Schedule a demo onsite or to learn more, visit the Salary.com booth #825 or contact Solutions@salary.com.

    About Salary.com
    Salary.com has been helping organizations with human capital needs for over 25 years. The company leads the industry in compensation data, software, and services. More than 30,000 organizations in 30+ countries use Salary.com’s solutions to hire and retain talent and compete in a changing world. Salary.com provides over 10 billion data points across over 225 industries using a proprietary AI framework to ensure fair pay. The company’s main product, CompAnalyst®, helps organizations simplify hiring, reduce guesswork, and increase retention. Employee trust depends on fair pay, and Salary.com helps get it right. For additional information, please visit www.salary.com/business.

    Note to editors: Trademarks and registered trademarks referenced herein remain the property of their respective owners. This press release is the copyrighted material of Salary.com and may not be uploaded into any LLM or AI without obtaining written permission in advance from Salary.com’s media contact.

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Walgreens Agrees To Pay Up to $350M for Illegally Filling Unlawful Opioid Prescriptions and Submitting False Claims

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    WASHINGTON — The Justice Department, together with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), today announced a $300 million settlement with Walgreens Boots Alliance, Walgreen Co., and various subsidiaries (collectively, Walgreens) to resolve allegations that the national chain pharmacy illegally filled millions of invalid prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances in violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and then sought payment for many of those invalid prescriptions by Medicare and other federal health care programs in violation of the False Claims Act (FCA). The settlement amount is based on Walgreens’s ability to pay. Walgreens will owe the United States an additional $50 million if the company is sold, merged, or transferred prior to fiscal year 2032.

    The government’s complaint, filed on Jan. 16 and amended April 18 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleges that from approximately August 2012 through March 1, 2023, Walgreens, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy chains, knowingly filled millions of unlawful controlled substance prescriptions. These unlawful prescriptions included prescriptions for excessive quantities of opioids, opioid prescriptions filled significantly early, and prescriptions for the especially dangerous and abused combination of three drugs known as a “trinity.” Walgreens pharmacists allegedly filled these prescriptions despite clear red flags indicating a high likelihood that the prescriptions were invalid because they lacked a legitimate medical purpose or were not issued in the usual course of professional practice. 

    The complaint further alleges that Walgreens pressured its pharmacists to fill prescriptions quickly and without taking the time needed to confirm that each prescription was lawful. Walgreens’s compliance officials also allegedly ignored substantial evidence that its stores were dispensing unlawful prescriptions and even intentionally deprived its own pharmacists of crucial information, including by refusing to share internal data regarding prescribers with pharmacists and preventing pharmacists from warning one another about certain problematic prescribers.

    In light of the settlement, the United States has moved to dismiss its complaint. Walgreens will also move to dismiss a related declaratory judgment action filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

    “Pharmacies have a legal responsibility to prescribe controlled substances in a safe and professional manner, not dispense dangerous drugs just for profit,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “This Department of Justice is committed to ending the opioid crisis and holding bad actors accountable for their failure to protect patients from addiction.”

    “This settlement resolves allegations that, for years, Walgreens failed to meet its obligations when dispensing dangerous opioids and other drugs,” said Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Granston of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “We will continue to hold accountable those entities and individuals whose actions contributed to the opioid crisis, whether through illegal prescribing, marketing, dispensing or distributing activities.”

    “Importantly, Walgreens’s agreements with the DEA and HHS-OIG provide swift relief in the form of monitoring and claims review that will improve Walgreens’s practices immediately,” said U.S. Attorney Andrew S. Boutros for the Northern District of Illinois. “Our office will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to ensure that opioids are properly dispensed and that taxpayer funds are only spent on legitimate pharmacy claims.”

    “This landmark civil settlement is the largest Controlled Substances Act resolution in our district’s history and once again confirms the high priority our office has placed upon confronting those responsible for the opioid crisis here,” said U.S. Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe for the Middle District of Florida. “We are grateful for the energy and collaborative spirit brought to this effort by our colleagues in the DEA, the Department of Justice Civil Frauds Section and Consumer Protection Branch, and the United States Attorneys’ Offices for the Northern District of Illinois, District of Maryland, Eastern District of New York, and Eastern District of Virginia.”  

    “With the power to dispense potentially harmful substances comes the responsibility to ensure that every prescription is legitimate before it is filled,” said U.S. Attorney Kelly O. Hayes for the District of Maryland. “When pharmacies fail that responsibility, this office will work with others across the country to hold accountable those who put patients and communities at risk.”

    “This settlement holds Walgreens accountable for failing to comply with its critical responsibility to prevent the diversion of opioids and other controlled substances,” said U.S. Attorney John J. Durham for the Eastern District of New York. “The settlement also underscores our office’s continued commitment to ensure that all persons and businesses that fill controlled-substance prescriptions adhere to the requirements of the Controlled Substances Act that are designed to prevent highly addictive medications from being used for illegitimate purposes.”    

    “Strict compliance with the law is essential to safeguarding the public, who rely on carefully considered and limited prescriptions for their health and wellbeing,” said U.S. Attorney Erik S. Siebert for the Eastern District of Virginia. “Those companies and individuals authorized to provide controlled substances have a professional responsibility to ensure that the prescriptions they fill are within the course of professional practice and regulations. Medically unnecessary prescriptions are a cost ultimately borne by the taxpayers and consumers. As we continue to address the opioid crisis here in Virginia and across the nation, we are determined to ensure pharmacies and pharmacists operate within the law.”

    In addition to the monetary payments announced today, Walgreens has entered into agreements with DEA and HHS-OIG to address its future obligations in dispensing controlled substances. Walgreens and DEA entered into a memorandum of agreement that requires the company to implement and maintain certain compliance measures for the next seven years. Walgreens must maintain policies and procedures requiring pharmacists to confirm the validity of controlled substance prescriptions prior to dispensing controlled substances, provide annual training to pharmacy employees regarding their legal obligations relating to controlled substances, verify that pharmacy staffing is sufficient to enable pharmacy employees to comply with those legal obligations, and maintain a system for blocking prescriptions from prescribers whom Walgreens becomes aware are writing illegitimate controlled substance prescriptions. Walgreens has also entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG, which further requires Walgreens to establish and maintain a compliance program that includes written policies and procedures, training, board oversight, and periodic reporting to HHS-OIG related to Walgreens’s dispensing of controlled substances. 

    “Pharmacies have an obligation to ensure that every prescription for highly addictive controlled substances is legitimate and issued responsibly in compliance with the Controlled Substances Act,” said DEA Acting Administrator Derek Maltz. “When one of the nation’s largest pharmacies fails at this obligation, they jeopardize the health and safety of their customers and place the American public in danger. The DEA remains committed to protecting all Americans from unscrupulous practices that prioritize profit over patient safety.”

    “Pharmacies that neglect their legal duties and their critical role in delivering safe and appropriate medications to enrollees of federal health care programs, and instead exploit these programs for market advantage, squander taxpayer dollars and put patient safety at risk,” said Acting Inspector General Juliet T. Hodgkins of HHS-OIG. “HHS-OIG and our law enforcement partners will use every tool in our arsenal to prevent these outcomes. This settlement and corporate integrity agreement reflect HHS-OIG’s commitment to ensuring compliance, correcting failures in oversight, and protecting the foundation of federally-funded health care.”

    “In the midst of the opioid crisis that has plagued our nation, we rely on pharmacies to prevent not facilitate the unlawful distribution of these potentially harmful substances,” said Norbert E. Vint, Deputy Inspector General Performing the Duties of the Inspector General at OPM OIG. “We applaud our investigative staff, law enforcement partners, and partners at the Department of Justice for their hard work and unwavering commitment to protecting patients from harm.”

    The civil settlement resolves four cases brought under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the FCA by former Walgreens employees. The FCA authorizes whistleblowers to sue on behalf of the United States and receive a share of any recovery. It also permits the United States to intervene and take over such lawsuits, as it did here. The relators will receive a 17.25% share of the government’s FCA recovery in this matter.

    The United States’ pursuit of this matter underscores the government’s commitment to combating health care fraud. One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act. Tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement can be reported to HHS-OIG, at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).

    The DEA, HHS-OIG, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Defense Health Agency (DHA), Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Department of Labor (DOL) Office of Inspector General, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Office of Inspector General, FBI Chicago Field Office, and the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the District of Colorado, Southern District of California, Eastern District of California, Northern District of California, Eastern District of Washington, Southern District of Alabama, Southern District of Illinois, Central District of Illinois, District of Arizona, Western District of Texas, Northern District of Texas, District of Puerto Rico, and Eastern District of Louisianaprovided substantial assistance in the investigation.

    The United States is represented in this matter by attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Division Consumer Protection Branch (Assistant Director Amy DeLine and Trial Attorney Nicole Frazer) and Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section (Assistant Director Natalie Waites and Trial Attorney Joshua Barron), as well as from the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the Northern District of Illinois (Assistant U.S. Attorney Valerie R. Raedy), Middle District of Florida (Chief of the Civil Division Randy Harwell and Assistant U.S. Attorney Carolyn Tapie), District of Maryland (Chief of the Civil Division Thomas Corcoran), Eastern District of New York (Assistant U.S. Attorney Elliot M. Schachner) and Eastern District of Virginia (Assistant U.S. Attorney John Beerbower). Fraud Section senior financial analyst Karen Sharp provided support for the matter.

    The claims asserted against defendants are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Five Star Bancorp Declares First Quarter Cash Dividend

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    RANCHO CORDOVA, Calif., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Five Star Bancorp (Nasdaq: FSBC) (“Five Star” or the “Company”), a holding company that operates through its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Five Star Bank (the “Bank”), announced today the declaration of a cash dividend of $0.20 per share on the Company’s voting common stock. The dividend is expected to be paid on May 12, 2025, to shareholders of record as of May 5, 2025.

    About Five Star Bancorp
    Five Star is a bank holding company headquartered in Rancho Cordova, California. Five Star operates through its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Five Star Bank. The Bank has eight branches in Northern California. For more information, visit https://www.fivestarbank.com.

    Special Note Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements represent plans, estimates, objectives, goals, guidelines, expectations, intentions, projections, and statements of the Company’s beliefs concerning future events, business plans, objectives, expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based. Forward-looking statements include without limitation, any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance, or achievements, and are typically identified with words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “aim,” “intend,” “plan,” or words or phases of similar meaning. The Company cautions that the forward-looking statements are based largely on the Company’s expectations and are subject to a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are subject to change based on factors which are, in many instances, beyond the Company’s control. Such forward-looking statements are based on various assumptions (some of which may be beyond the Company’s control) and are subject to risks and uncertainties, which change over time, and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated. New risks and uncertainties may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Company to predict their occurrence or how they will affect the Company. If one or more of the factors affecting the Company’s forward-looking information and statements proves incorrect, then the Company’s actual results, performance, or achievements could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, forward-looking information and statements contained in this press release. Therefore, the Company cautions you not to place undue reliance on the Company’s forward-looking information and statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements are set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 under the section entitled “Risk Factors,” and other documents filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time.

    The Company disclaims any duty to revise or update the forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, to reflect actual results or changes in the factors affecting the forward-looking statements, except as specifically required by law.

    Investor Contact:
    Heather C. Luck, Chief Financial Officer
    Five Star Bancorp
    (916) 626-5008
    hluck@fivestarbank.com

    Media Contact:
    Shelley R. Wetton, Chief Marketing Officer
    Five Star Bancorp
    (916) 284-7827
    swetton@fivestarbank.com

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: The new abnormal: Debating Canada’s future at a hinge point in history

    Source: The Conversation – Canada – By Stewart Prest, Lecturer, Political Science, University of British Columbia

    Canadians watched the two leaders’ debates unfold last week in Montréal. The debates, and this election, occur at a pivotal moment in history. Canadians go to the polls as the future of global democracy and governance, and in fact the very independence of the country, is in the balance.

    In crucial ways, the debates failed to meet the moment — and therefore will likely be forgotten as Canadians vote cast their ballots in a week. Unlike a past debate that focused on Canadian sovereignty between John Turner and Brian Mulroney in 1988, this one featured few knockout punches or memorable moments.

    Shadows of the past

    In the weeks prior to the debates, observers drew comparisons to that momentous English-language leaders’ showdown 37 years ago. That debate laid out a clear question for voters: Are you in favour of entering a free-trade agreement with the United States?

    Prime Minister Mulroney was supportive of the agreement, while Liberal Leader Turner was sharply opposed, fearing for the country’s independence.

    In the end, both Mulroney and Turner had a point. In the ensuing decades, free trade with the U.S. has brought both prosperity and dependence on the country as the Canadian economy became ever more deeply intertwined with that of the United States.

    A hinge point in history

    In 2025, we face an even more pivotal moment. The global order is shifting.

    Under Donald Trump, the U.S. has moved away from its decades-old position at the heart of a liberal international order centred on western democracies to embrace a transactional and illiberal foreign policy built on the language of power.




    Read more:
    Like dictators before him, Trump threatens international peace and security


    Given the gravity of the moment however, we heard comparatively little during the debates about how Canada must respond at this hinge point in history as Canadians adapt to a predictably unpredictable future.

    The threat of economic tariffs, while real, are just the beginning. Leaders alluded to the fact that Canada’s erstwhile closest ally now constitutes a threat to Canadian sovereignty, but it was not a major point of discussion, even as the the White House Press secretary recently affirmed Trump still wants Canada to become the 51st state. Threats to the territorial integrity of other former American allies continue as well.

    Viewers heard questions during the debate related to the possibility that the U.S. may no longer support Ukraine, but nothing about how Trump shocked the world with a very public dressing-down of Ukraine’s president or how he seems more comfortable co-operating with Vladimir Putin’s Russia.

    Virtually no mention was made of the fact that the U.S. is, by some measures, no longer a democracy. Its courts are politicized. Congress is polarized. The federal civil service remains under siege, and key institutions of civil society are under pressure to conform to Trump’s demands. Nor was there any discussion about how the Trump administration is openly defying court orders, effectively flouting the rule of law, and what that could mean for Trump’s annexation threats against Canada.

    There was some talk during the debate of Canada trying to reach the (Trump-demanded) NATO military target for military spending, but nothing about the fact that the future of the alliance is uncertain. European states are openly questioning the credibility of American support in the event of an attack and European leaders discussing defence strategies without American involvement for the first time since the Second World War.




    Read more:
    How could Canada deter an invasion? Nukes and mandatory military service


    A debate like any other

    It’s clear from such silences on the debate stage that Canadian voters, journalists, debate moderators and politicians alike are all still coming to terms with the depth of change in the world around them.

    The debate was filled with talk of pipelines, housing strategies and domestic law and order. In fact, neither debate was much different from those of the past 20 years.

    That’s not to suggest domestic challenges don’t require substantive discussion and policy proposals. As I and others have argued, the populist anti-incumbent wave that we saw sweeping Canadian and global politics in recent years can be traced to the sense that a portion of the population — younger voters in particular — feel left behind and ignored.




    Read more:
    Justin Trudeau’s bleak poll numbers are part of a global trend as young voters reject incumbents


    The challenges are multiple and significant, including but not limited to housing and affordability, public safety and policing, slow economic development and the challenges of responding to climate change in an economy dependent on energy exports.

    Nonetheless, in focusing so heavily on domestic and not global threats, the debate verged at times on the parochial.

    Bloc leader Yves-François Blanchet, for instance, tried to keep provincial jurisdiction and Québec’s interests top of mind. NDP leader Jagmeet Singh’s message, at its most effective, was that as the country turns to face new challenges, it cannot forget about the marginalized in Canadian society and abroad. Worthy points, but secondary to the larger moment.

    Ultimately, the debate was dominated by the other two men on the stage with a real chance to govern the country next week: Liberal Leader Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.

    The two appeared united in their passion for the country and pipelines, and share some other priorities, notably facilitating interprovincial economic integration.

    Conservative base is divided

    In other respects, the two leaders diverged significantly in their views. Of all the leaders, Carney was the most willing to discuss the Trump threat, including when he suggested in his closing English remarks that Trump is “trying to break us so the U.S. can own us.”

    For the majority of the debates, however, the Liberal leader focused primarily on the economic threat. He argued that the country must look away from the U.S., and instead build inward with investment in housing and energy at home, and build outward by identifying more reliable markets and allies abroad.

    Poilievre’s messaging was more nuanced, moving in different directions to suit different audiences. No doubt this is because the country’s Conservative voting base is itself deeply divided between mainstream conservatives who share their fellow Canadians’ concerns about Trump and a populist faction that tends to identify with the MAGA movement in numerous ways.




    Read more:
    Why some Canadians are in denial about Donald Trump


    In attempting to square that circle, Poilievre has signalled strong opposition to Trump and his tariffs — a point he repeatedly discussed during the debate — and called for measures to enhance Canadian productivity, notably in the energy sector.

    At the same time, however, he endorsed other policies that evoke aspects of Trump’s own political agenda, something he largely avoided mentioning during the debates. Notable among are Poilievre’s promised war on “woke” culture. While not discussed in detail during the debates, disruptive questions from right-wing media outlets following the French debate illustrated just how close to the surface such issues remain.

    The ‘new abnormal’

    In the absence of a significant gaffe, knockout blow or other dramatic twist, the debates are unlikely to change many minds, and seem likely to soon fade from memory.

    Initial post-debate polling suggests as much. Anyone leaning one way or another heard enough to affirm their views as they tuned into the debates, and nothing to make them question their choice.

    Answers to larger questions about how Canada should move forward in this emergent new global order, amid daunting new threats to peace and democracy, remain only hinted at. Whoever wins the election, those questions will continue to be asked with increased urgency in the coming years.

    Stewart Prest does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. The new abnormal: Debating Canada’s future at a hinge point in history – https://theconversation.com/the-new-abnormal-debating-canadas-future-at-a-hinge-point-in-history-254675

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Hickenlooper, Coons, Cornyn, Young Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Improve Mapping, Safe Extraction of Critical Minerals

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator John Hickenlooper – Colorado
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senators John Hickenlooper, Chris Coons, John Cornyn, and Todd Young introduced the bipartisan Finding Opportunities for Resource Exploration (Finding ORE) Act to strengthen U.S. mineral security and reduce strategic vulnerabilities. The bill leverages the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) mapping of critical mineral reserves to help responsibly develop global mineral resources around the world.
    “We can’t solve climate change or strengthen national security without harnessing the power of critical minerals,” said Hickenlooper. “Better and more accurate maps will help us and our allies safely and ethically explore untapped critical mineral deposits.”
    “From the technology that powers the cell phones in our pockets to the systems that keep us safe, Americans depend on critical minerals for our economic strength and national security,” said Coons. “The Finding ORE Act makes sure that our nation will have access to the essential materials we need to keep innovating, growing our economy, and deterring our enemies. I’m grateful for the bipartisan and industry support this bill has received and look forward to pushing for its enactment.”
    “Access to a reliable supply chain of critical minerals is essential to meet our nation’s defense, manufacturing, and energy needs,” said Cornyn. “By shoring up alliances with trusted allies and promoting geological mapping of critical mineral reserves, this legislation would ensure America has the resources needed to keep up with global demand and bolster both our mineral security and national security in the years ahead.”
    “Many countries are unmapped or reliant on outdated geological surveys. Our bill would create opportunities for collaboration between the United States and these countries to update geological mapping with the goal of locating critical mineral deposits. These partnerships would be mutually beneficial and provide the United States access to more critical minerals, reducing our dependence on China,” said Young.
    The Finding ORE Act would authorize the Director of USGS to enter into memoranda of understanding (MOU) with foreign partner countries related to mapping of critical minerals. The bill identifies four objectives for these MOU:
    Committing USGS to assist the partner country with a range of critical mineral mapping activities
    Committing the partner country to offer a right of first refusal to private companies based in the United States or an allied country in the further development of mapped critical minerals
    Facilitating investment in the development of critical minerals in the partner country, including by leveraging financing from the U.S. Development Finance Corporation and Export-Import Bank
    Ensuring that mapping data created through partnership with USGS is not disclosed to governmental or private entities in non-allied countries
    The bill requires USGS to collaborate with both the State Department and the private sector in identifying which countries to prioritize for negotiation of an MOU and would involve the State Department in the negotiation and implementation process.
    “Colorado School of Mines commends Senators Coons, Young, Hickenlooper, and Cornyn and Reps. Wittman and Castor for their bipartisan efforts to leverage U.S. expertise in mineral mapping to support safe, secure, and responsible mineral supply chains,” said Dr. John Bradford, Vice President for Global Initiatives at Colorado School of Mines. “When called upon to contribute, institutions with strong partnerships with USGS, like Colorado School of Mines, seek to support America’s government and industry partners to advance the technology, knowledge, and workforce required to responsibly identify, assess, and produce mineral resources in the U.S. and around the world.”
    “The United States has too often watched from the sidelines as our adversaries explored, invested in, and secured the world’s most promising mineral deposits,” said Abigail Hunter, Executive Director of SAFE’s Center for Critical Minerals Strategy. “This bill changes that. It positions the United States—our geological experts and industry—to help identify and potentially develop the next generation of great deposits. It ensures we show up in resource-rich nations, rather than leaving them to deepen their ties with China.”
    “The American Critical Minerals Association welcomes the bipartisan, bicameral introduction of the Finding ORE Act by Senators Coons, Young, Hickenlooper, and Cornyn and Representatives Wittman and Castor,” said Sarah Venuto, Executive Director of ACMA. “Expanding our knowledge base of global minerals resources and growing partnerships with our allies will ensure the United States is a leading force in resourcing critical minerals in a responsible way. ACMA looks forward to working with Senator Coons and his colleagues to advance the Finding ORE Act.”
    “BPC Action applauds the bipartisan introduction of the Finding ORE Act. The bill will strengthen U.S. supply chain security by enhancing coordination with allies on critical mineral development, helping secure new critical minerals sources free from adversary control,” said Michele Stockwell, president of Bipartisan Policy Center Action (BPC Action).
    “Terra AI celebrates this forward-thinking, bi-partisan critical minerals exploration legislation introduced by Senators Coons, Young, Hickenlooper, and Cornyn and Reps. Wittman and Castor,” said John Mern, CEO of Terra AI. “The Finding ORE Act would empower America’s agencies and private firms to explore and claim the next major deposits of critical minerals which will supply our industries for decades to come; supporting manufacturing, aerospace, energy, and artificial intelligence. We support this act’s unique approach to winning the critical minerals race by leveraging America and Her Allies’ relative advantages — strong diplomatic relations, world-leading technology, and entrepreneurial spirit. This act is the essential early stage first step to establishing US global mineral dominance and winning this generational opportunity. As a mineral exploration AI company, we see huge value in collaboration between the private sector and our nation’s diplomatic, geologic and financial agencies abroad. It is a winning playbook, and we look forward to seeing more legislation in this area.”
    A companion bill is led by Representatives Rob Wittman and Kathy Castor in the U.S. House of Representatives.
    In the 119th Congress, Hickenlooper has led and co-sponsored multiple other critical minerals related legislation, including:
    The bipartisan STRATEGIC Minerals Act to foster critical minerals trade with our international allies, led by Senator Young.
    His bipartisan Unearth Innovation Act to establish a DOE program for sustainable critical mineral research innovation and recycling.
    His bipartisan Critical Materials Future Act to establish a pilot program for the Department of Energy to financially support domestic critical material processing projects.
    The bipartisan Critical Minerals Security Act to help secure U.S. critical mineral supply chains and counter China’s dominance in the industry.
    A one-pager on the bill is available HERE.
    The full text of the bill is available HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Walgreens Agrees to Pay Up to $350M for Illegally Filling Unlawful Opioid Prescriptions and for Submitting False Claims to the Federal Government

    Source: US State of California

    Note: View settlement here.

    The Justice Department, together with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), today announced a $300 million settlement with Walgreens Boots Alliance, Walgreen Co., and various subsidiaries (collectively, Walgreens) to resolve allegations that the national chain pharmacy illegally filled millions of invalid prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances in violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and then sought payment for many of those invalid prescriptions by Medicare and other federal health care programs in violation of the False Claims Act (FCA). The settlement amount is based on Walgreens’s ability to pay. Walgreens will owe the United States an additional $50 million if the company is sold, merged, or transferred prior to fiscal year 2032.

    The government’s complaint, filed on Jan. 16 and amended April 18 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleges that from approximately August 2012 through March 1, 2023, Walgreens, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy chains, knowingly filled millions of unlawful controlled substance prescriptions. These unlawful prescriptions included prescriptions for excessive quantities of opioids, opioid prescriptions filled significantly early, and prescriptions for the especially dangerous and abused combination of three drugs known as a “trinity.” Walgreens pharmacists allegedly filled these prescriptions despite clear red flags indicating a high likelihood that the prescriptions were invalid because they lacked a legitimate medical purpose or were not issued in the usual course of professional practice. 

    The complaint further alleges that Walgreens pressured its pharmacists to fill prescriptions quickly and without taking the time needed to confirm that each prescription was lawful. Walgreens’s compliance officials also allegedly ignored substantial evidence that its stores were dispensing unlawful prescriptions and even intentionally deprived its own pharmacists of crucial information, including by refusing to share internal data regarding prescribers with pharmacists and preventing pharmacists from warning one another about certain problematic prescribers.

    In light of Friday’s settlement, the United States has moved to dismiss its complaint. Walgreens will also move to dismiss a related declaratory judgment action filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

    “Pharmacies have a legal responsibility to prescribe controlled substances in a safe and professional manner, not dispense dangerous drugs just for profit,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “This Department of Justice is committed to ending the opioid crisis and holding bad actors accountable for their failure to protect patients from addiction.”

    “This settlement resolves allegations that, for years, Walgreens failed to meet its obligations when dispensing dangerous opioids and other drugs,” said Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Granston of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “We will continue to hold accountable those entities and individuals whose actions contributed to the opioid crisis, whether through illegal prescribing, marketing, dispensing or distributing activities.”

    “Importantly, Walgreens’s agreements with the DEA and HHS-OIG provide swift relief in the form of monitoring and claims review that will improve Walgreens’s practices immediately,” said U.S. Attorney Andrew S. Boutros for the Northern District of Illinois. “Our office will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to ensure that opioids are properly dispensed and that taxpayer funds are only spent on legitimate pharmacy claims.”

    “This landmark civil settlement is the largest Controlled Substances Act resolution in our district’s history and once again confirms the high priority our office has placed upon confronting those responsible for the opioid crisis here,” said U.S. Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe for the Middle District of Florida. “We are grateful for the energy and collaborative spirit brought to this effort by our colleagues in the DEA, the Department of Justice Civil Frauds Section and Consumer Protection Branch, and the United States Attorneys’ Offices for the Northern District of Illinois, District of Maryland, Eastern District of New York, and Eastern District of Virginia.” 

    “With the power to dispense potentially harmful substances comes the responsibility to ensure that every prescription is legitimate before it is filled,” said U.S. Attorney Kelly O. Hayes for the District of Maryland. “When pharmacies fail that responsibility, this office will work with others across the country to hold accountable those who put patients and communities at risk.”

    “This settlement holds Walgreens accountable for failing to comply with its critical responsibility to prevent the diversion of opioids and other controlled substances,” said U.S. Attorney John J. Durham for the Eastern District of New York. “The settlement also underscores our office’s continued commitment to ensure that all persons and businesses that fill controlled-substance prescriptions adhere to the requirements of the Controlled Substances Act that are designed to prevent highly addictive medications from being used for illegitimate purposes.”    

    “Strict compliance with the law is essential to safeguarding the public, who rely on carefully considered and limited prescriptions for their health and wellbeing,” said U.S. Attorney Erik S. Siebert for the Eastern District of Virginia. “Those companies and individuals authorized to provide controlled substances have a professional responsibility to ensure that the prescriptions they fill are within the course of professional practice and regulations. Medically unnecessary prescriptions are a cost ultimately borne by the taxpayers and consumers. As we continue to address the opioid crisis here in Virginia and across the nation, we are determined to ensure pharmacies and pharmacists operate within the law.”

    In addition to the monetary payments announced today, Walgreens has entered into agreements with DEA and HHS-OIG to address its future obligations in dispensing controlled substances. Walgreens and DEA entered into a memorandum of agreement that requires the company to implement and maintain certain compliance measures for the next seven years. Walgreens must maintain policies and procedures requiring pharmacists to confirm the validity of controlled substance prescriptions prior to dispensing controlled substances, provide annual training to pharmacy employees regarding their legal obligations relating to controlled substances, verify that pharmacy staffing is sufficient to enable pharmacy employees to comply with those legal obligations, and maintain a system for blocking prescriptions from prescribers whom Walgreens becomes aware are writing illegitimate controlled substance prescriptions. Walgreens has also entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG, which further requires Walgreens to establish and maintain a compliance program that includes written policies and procedures, training, board oversight, and periodic reporting to HHS-OIG related to Walgreens’s dispensing of controlled substances. 

    “Pharmacies have an obligation to ensure that every prescription for highly addictive controlled substances is legitimate and issued responsibly in compliance with the Controlled Substances Act,” said DEA Acting Administrator Derek Maltz. “When one of the nation’s largest pharmacies fails at this obligation, they jeopardize the health and safety of their customers and place the American public in danger. The DEA remains committed to protecting all Americans from unscrupulous practices that prioritize profit over patient safety.”

    “Pharmacies that neglect their legal duties and their critical role in delivering safe and appropriate medications to enrollees of federal health care programs, and instead exploit these programs for market advantage, squander taxpayer dollars and put patient safety at risk,” said Acting Inspector General Juliet T. Hodgkins of HHS-OIG. “HHS-OIG and our law enforcement partners will use every tool in our arsenal to prevent these outcomes. This settlement and corporate integrity agreement reflect HHS-OIG’s commitment to ensuring compliance, correcting failures in oversight, and protecting the foundation of federally-funded health care.”

    “In the midst of the opioid crisis that has plagued our nation, we rely on pharmacies to prevent not facilitate the unlawful distribution of these potentially harmful substances,” said Norbert E. Vint, Deputy Inspector General Performing the Duties of the Inspector General at OPM OIG. “We applaud our investigative staff, law enforcement partners, and partners at the Department of Justice for their hard work and unwavering commitment to protecting patients from harm.”

    The civil settlement resolves four cases brought under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the FCA by former Walgreens employees. The FCA authorizes whistleblowers to sue on behalf of the United States and receive a share of any recovery. It also permits the United States to intervene and take over such lawsuits, as it did here. The relators will receive a 17.25% share of the government’s FCA recovery in this matter.

    The United States’ pursuit of this matter underscores the government’s commitment to combating health care fraud. One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act. Tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement can be reported to HHS-OIG, at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).

    The DEA, HHS-OIG, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Defense Health Agency (DHA), Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Department of Labor (DOL) Office of Inspector General, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Office of Inspector General, FBI Chicago Field Office, and the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the District of Colorado, Southern District of California, Eastern District of California, Northern District of California, Eastern District of Washington, Southern District of Alabama, Southern District of Illinois, Central District of Illinois, District of Arizona, Western District of Texas, Northern District of Texas, District of Puerto Rico, and Eastern District of Louisiana provided substantial assistance in the investigation.

    The United States is represented in this matter by attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Division Consumer Protection Branch (Assistant Director Amy DeLine and Trial Attorney Nicole Frazer) and Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section (Assistant Director Natalie Waites and Trial Attorney Joshua Barron), as well as from the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the Northern District of Illinois (Assistant U.S. Attorney Valerie R. Raedy), Middle District of Florida (Chief of the Civil Division Randy Harwell and Assistant U.S. Attorney Carolyn Tapie), District of Maryland (Chief of the Civil Division Thomas Corcoran), Eastern District of New York (Assistant U.S. Attorney Elliot M. Schachner) and Eastern District of Virginia (Assistant U.S. Attorney John Beerbower). Fraud Section senior financial analyst Karen Sharp provided support for the matter.

    The claims asserted against defendants are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.

    Additional information about the Consumer Protection Branch and its enforcement efforts can be found at www.justice.gov/civil/consumer-protection-branch. Additional information about the Fraud Section of the Civil Division and its enforcement efforts can be found at www.justice.gov/civil/fraud-section.  

    For information about the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, visit:

    For information about the federal agencies involved in this investigation and their work to combat the opioid crisis and federal healthcare fraud, visit:

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Walgreens Agrees to Pay Up to $350M for Illegally Filling Unlawful Opioid Prescriptions and for Submitting False Claims to the Federal Government

    Source: United States Department of Justice Criminal Division

    Note: View settlement here.

    The Justice Department, together with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), today announced a $300 million settlement with Walgreens Boots Alliance, Walgreen Co., and various subsidiaries (collectively, Walgreens) to resolve allegations that the national chain pharmacy illegally filled millions of invalid prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances in violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and then sought payment for many of those invalid prescriptions by Medicare and other federal health care programs in violation of the False Claims Act (FCA). The settlement amount is based on Walgreens’s ability to pay. Walgreens will owe the United States an additional $50 million if the company is sold, merged, or transferred prior to fiscal year 2032.

    The government’s complaint, filed on Jan. 16 and amended April 18 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleges that from approximately August 2012 through March 1, 2023, Walgreens, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy chains, knowingly filled millions of unlawful controlled substance prescriptions. These unlawful prescriptions included prescriptions for excessive quantities of opioids, opioid prescriptions filled significantly early, and prescriptions for the especially dangerous and abused combination of three drugs known as a “trinity.” Walgreens pharmacists allegedly filled these prescriptions despite clear red flags indicating a high likelihood that the prescriptions were invalid because they lacked a legitimate medical purpose or were not issued in the usual course of professional practice. 

    The complaint further alleges that Walgreens pressured its pharmacists to fill prescriptions quickly and without taking the time needed to confirm that each prescription was lawful. Walgreens’s compliance officials also allegedly ignored substantial evidence that its stores were dispensing unlawful prescriptions and even intentionally deprived its own pharmacists of crucial information, including by refusing to share internal data regarding prescribers with pharmacists and preventing pharmacists from warning one another about certain problematic prescribers.

    In light of Friday’s settlement, the United States has moved to dismiss its complaint. Walgreens will also move to dismiss a related declaratory judgment action filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

    “Pharmacies have a legal responsibility to prescribe controlled substances in a safe and professional manner, not dispense dangerous drugs just for profit,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “This Department of Justice is committed to ending the opioid crisis and holding bad actors accountable for their failure to protect patients from addiction.”

    “This settlement resolves allegations that, for years, Walgreens failed to meet its obligations when dispensing dangerous opioids and other drugs,” said Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Granston of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “We will continue to hold accountable those entities and individuals whose actions contributed to the opioid crisis, whether through illegal prescribing, marketing, dispensing or distributing activities.”

    “Importantly, Walgreens’s agreements with the DEA and HHS-OIG provide swift relief in the form of monitoring and claims review that will improve Walgreens’s practices immediately,” said U.S. Attorney Andrew S. Boutros for the Northern District of Illinois. “Our office will continue to work with our law enforcement partners to ensure that opioids are properly dispensed and that taxpayer funds are only spent on legitimate pharmacy claims.”

    “This landmark civil settlement is the largest Controlled Substances Act resolution in our district’s history and once again confirms the high priority our office has placed upon confronting those responsible for the opioid crisis here,” said U.S. Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe for the Middle District of Florida. “We are grateful for the energy and collaborative spirit brought to this effort by our colleagues in the DEA, the Department of Justice Civil Frauds Section and Consumer Protection Branch, and the United States Attorneys’ Offices for the Northern District of Illinois, District of Maryland, Eastern District of New York, and Eastern District of Virginia.” 

    “With the power to dispense potentially harmful substances comes the responsibility to ensure that every prescription is legitimate before it is filled,” said U.S. Attorney Kelly O. Hayes for the District of Maryland. “When pharmacies fail that responsibility, this office will work with others across the country to hold accountable those who put patients and communities at risk.”

    “This settlement holds Walgreens accountable for failing to comply with its critical responsibility to prevent the diversion of opioids and other controlled substances,” said U.S. Attorney John J. Durham for the Eastern District of New York. “The settlement also underscores our office’s continued commitment to ensure that all persons and businesses that fill controlled-substance prescriptions adhere to the requirements of the Controlled Substances Act that are designed to prevent highly addictive medications from being used for illegitimate purposes.”    

    “Strict compliance with the law is essential to safeguarding the public, who rely on carefully considered and limited prescriptions for their health and wellbeing,” said U.S. Attorney Erik S. Siebert for the Eastern District of Virginia. “Those companies and individuals authorized to provide controlled substances have a professional responsibility to ensure that the prescriptions they fill are within the course of professional practice and regulations. Medically unnecessary prescriptions are a cost ultimately borne by the taxpayers and consumers. As we continue to address the opioid crisis here in Virginia and across the nation, we are determined to ensure pharmacies and pharmacists operate within the law.”

    In addition to the monetary payments announced today, Walgreens has entered into agreements with DEA and HHS-OIG to address its future obligations in dispensing controlled substances. Walgreens and DEA entered into a memorandum of agreement that requires the company to implement and maintain certain compliance measures for the next seven years. Walgreens must maintain policies and procedures requiring pharmacists to confirm the validity of controlled substance prescriptions prior to dispensing controlled substances, provide annual training to pharmacy employees regarding their legal obligations relating to controlled substances, verify that pharmacy staffing is sufficient to enable pharmacy employees to comply with those legal obligations, and maintain a system for blocking prescriptions from prescribers whom Walgreens becomes aware are writing illegitimate controlled substance prescriptions. Walgreens has also entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG, which further requires Walgreens to establish and maintain a compliance program that includes written policies and procedures, training, board oversight, and periodic reporting to HHS-OIG related to Walgreens’s dispensing of controlled substances. 

    “Pharmacies have an obligation to ensure that every prescription for highly addictive controlled substances is legitimate and issued responsibly in compliance with the Controlled Substances Act,” said DEA Acting Administrator Derek Maltz. “When one of the nation’s largest pharmacies fails at this obligation, they jeopardize the health and safety of their customers and place the American public in danger. The DEA remains committed to protecting all Americans from unscrupulous practices that prioritize profit over patient safety.”

    “Pharmacies that neglect their legal duties and their critical role in delivering safe and appropriate medications to enrollees of federal health care programs, and instead exploit these programs for market advantage, squander taxpayer dollars and put patient safety at risk,” said Acting Inspector General Juliet T. Hodgkins of HHS-OIG. “HHS-OIG and our law enforcement partners will use every tool in our arsenal to prevent these outcomes. This settlement and corporate integrity agreement reflect HHS-OIG’s commitment to ensuring compliance, correcting failures in oversight, and protecting the foundation of federally-funded health care.”

    “In the midst of the opioid crisis that has plagued our nation, we rely on pharmacies to prevent not facilitate the unlawful distribution of these potentially harmful substances,” said Norbert E. Vint, Deputy Inspector General Performing the Duties of the Inspector General at OPM OIG. “We applaud our investigative staff, law enforcement partners, and partners at the Department of Justice for their hard work and unwavering commitment to protecting patients from harm.”

    The civil settlement resolves four cases brought under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the FCA by former Walgreens employees. The FCA authorizes whistleblowers to sue on behalf of the United States and receive a share of any recovery. It also permits the United States to intervene and take over such lawsuits, as it did here. The relators will receive a 17.25% share of the government’s FCA recovery in this matter.

    The United States’ pursuit of this matter underscores the government’s commitment to combating health care fraud. One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act. Tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement can be reported to HHS-OIG, at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).

    The DEA, HHS-OIG, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Defense Health Agency (DHA), Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Department of Labor (DOL) Office of Inspector General, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Office of Inspector General, FBI Chicago Field Office, and the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the District of Colorado, Southern District of California, Eastern District of California, Northern District of California, Eastern District of Washington, Southern District of Alabama, Southern District of Illinois, Central District of Illinois, District of Arizona, Western District of Texas, Northern District of Texas, District of Puerto Rico, and Eastern District of Louisiana provided substantial assistance in the investigation.

    The United States is represented in this matter by attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Division Consumer Protection Branch (Assistant Director Amy DeLine and Trial Attorney Nicole Frazer) and Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section (Assistant Director Natalie Waites and Trial Attorney Joshua Barron), as well as from the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the Northern District of Illinois (Assistant U.S. Attorney Valerie R. Raedy), Middle District of Florida (Chief of the Civil Division Randy Harwell and Assistant U.S. Attorney Carolyn Tapie), District of Maryland (Chief of the Civil Division Thomas Corcoran), Eastern District of New York (Assistant U.S. Attorney Elliot M. Schachner) and Eastern District of Virginia (Assistant U.S. Attorney John Beerbower). Fraud Section senior financial analyst Karen Sharp provided support for the matter.

    The claims asserted against defendants are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.

    Additional information about the Consumer Protection Branch and its enforcement efforts can be found at www.justice.gov/civil/consumer-protection-branch. Additional information about the Fraud Section of the Civil Division and its enforcement efforts can be found at www.justice.gov/civil/fraud-section.  

    For information about the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices, visit:

    For information about the federal agencies involved in this investigation and their work to combat the opioid crisis and federal healthcare fraud, visit:

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: MEXC Announces Listing of Hyperlane (HYPER) with a 165,000 HYPER and 50,000 USDT Prize Pool

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VICTORIA, Seychelles, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — MEXC, a leading global cryptocurrency exchange, announced the Hyperlane (HYPER) listing on April 22, 2025(UTC). To celebrate this significant addition to the exchange, MEXC is launching a special event with a prize pool of 165,000 HYPER and 50,000 USDT for new and existing users.

    Hyperlane is the first permissionless, universal interoperability protocol dedicated to building a truly open and decentralized cross-chain communication infrastructure. As “The Open Interoperability Framework,” it enables anyone to freely expand, utilize, and customize the network, allowing developers to easily and securely build cross-chain applications and token bridges. To date, Hyperlane has connected over 140 blockchains, processed nearly 9 million cross-chain messages, and bridged more than $6 billion in volume through its Warp Routes.

    $HYPER is the native token of the Hyperlane ecosystem, with an initial total supply of 1 billion tokens. It plays a critical role in securing the protocol through staking, rewarding validators for verifying cross-chain messages, incentivizing user-driven activity, and enabling community governance over protocol development.

    To celebrate the listing, MEXC will launch an Airdrop+ event with substantial rewards for users:
    Event Period: April 21, 2025, 10:00 – May 01, 2025, 10:00 (UTC)
    Benefit 1: Deposit and share 120,000 HYPER (New user exclusive)
    Benefit 2: Spot Challenge — Trade to share 15,000 HYPER (For all users)
    Benefit 3: Futures Challenge — Trade to share 50,000 USDT in Futures bonus (For all users)
    Benefit 4: Invite new users and share 30,000 HYPER (For all users)

    MEXC has established itself as a leading exchange by consistently offering users early access to high-potential crypto assets. In 2024 alone, the platform listed 2,376 new tokens, including 1,716 initial listings. According to the latest TokenInsight report, MEXC led the industry with 461 spot listings between November 1, 2024, and February 15, 2025. During this period, the exchange maintained a high listing frequency, consistently ranking among the top six platforms, demonstrating its agility in capturing emerging market trends. MEXC will continue to expand its asset offerings and help users seize timely opportunities in the fast-moving crypto market.

    For full event details and participation rules, please visit here.

    About MEXC
    Founded in 2018, MEXC is committed to being “Your Easiest Way to Crypto.” Serving over 36 million users across 170+ countries, MEXC is known for its broad selection of trending tokens, everyday airdrop opportunities, and low trading fees. Our user-friendly platform is designed to support both new traders and experienced investors, offering secure and efficient access to digital assets. MEXC prioritizes simplicity and innovation, making crypto trading more accessible and rewarding.
    MEXC Official Website| X | Telegram |How to Sign Up on MEXC

    Risk Disclaimer:
    The information provided in this article regarding cryptocurrencies does not constitute investment advice. Given the highly volatile nature of the cryptocurrency market, investors are encouraged to carefully assess market fluctuations, the fundamentals of projects, and potential financial risks before making any trading decisions.

    Source

    Contact :
    Lucia Hu
    lucia.hu@mexc.com

    Disclaimer: This press release is provided by MEXC. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice. Investing in crypto and mining related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector–including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining–complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release.Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose.Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at:
    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/3f7a2b6b-03ea-4dc2-9cf4-d21adb93fe1c

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force Turns 45

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation FBI Crime News (b)

    The Federal Bureau of Investigation is marking the 45th anniversary of its first Joint Terrorism Task Force. Formed in New York in 1980, the first JTTF became a model for law enforcement cooperation across the nation. 
     
    Today, the FBI has a JTTF at each of its 55 field offices and at many of its smaller offices—about 280 locations in all. JTTFs gather investigators, intelligence analysts, linguists, and tactical experts from federal, state, local, territorial, and tribal law enforcement and intelligence agencies. Task force members share intelligence and investigative leads and respond to threats and incidents. 
     
    “The JTTF model clearly demonstrates the power of law enforcement cooperation at all levels,” said FBI Director Kash Patel. “Preventing terrorism is a no-fail mission. Only by working together can we keep the nation safe.”
     
    The FBI’s JTTF model dates to the 1979, when the New York Police Department and the FBI’s New York Field Office tackled the surge in violent bank robberies by pooling resources and expertise through a joint task force. In 1980, when terrorist bombings, bomb threats, and other violence plagued the city, officials decided to imitate the bank robbery task force. They announced the formation of the first JTTF in April 1980.  
     
    The first JTTF had 10 special agents and 10 police officers. The number of task forces grew over the years, with 35 JTTFs operating by the time terrorists attacked on 9/11. Shortly after 9/11, the FBI required all field offices to establish a JTTF. By the end of 2024, JTTFs drew nearly 4,400 members from 528 state, local, territorial, and tribal agencies and 53 federal agencies. 
     
    The FBI established its National Joint Terrorism Task Force to support the local task forces in June of 2002. The NJTTF at FBI Headquarters enhances communication, coordination, and cooperation from partner agencies. 
     
    JTTFs have disrupted dozens of plots in the past four decades, including a plan to attack millennial celebrations in Los Angeles in 2000; a plan to detonate a car bomb in Times Square in New York in 2010; and plans to sow chaos in Baltimore, Maryland, in 2022 and 2023 by destroying energy facilities. 
     
    JTTFs are also among the first responders to arrive at the scenes of horrific violence—whether they are terrorist-based or not—and lead the investigations of terrorist incidents. 
     
    Among the cases JTTFs have investigated are the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York; the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998; the bombing of the USS Cole in 2000; the 9/11 attacks in 2001; the Boston Marathon bombing in 2013; the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, in 2015; the shooting at Naval Air Station Pensacola in Florida in 2019; and the January 1, 2025, truck attack in New Orleans. 
     
    Additional Resources: 

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: BexBack Revolutionizes Crypto Trading with No KYC, 100x Leverage, $50 Welcome Bonus, and Double Deposit Offer

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SINGAPORE, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — As the cryptocurrency market continues to experience volatility, seasoned traders are looking for new ways to capitalize on market opportunities. Enter BexBack, the innovative crypto trading platform that is transforming the way people trade crypto futures. With no KYC, 100x leverage, and an aggressive bonus structure, BexBack is rapidly becoming the go-to destination for traders around the globe.

    The New Standard in Crypto Trading

    BexBack is shaking up the crypto trading industry by offering traders the ability to access 100x leverage with no KYC (Know Your Customer) requirements, making it the ideal choice for those looking for flexibility and security in their trades. Whether you’re an experienced trader or just getting started, BexBack offers a seamless and secure platform for crypto futures trading.

    Double Deposit Bonus – More Money to Trade

    As part of its exciting offer, BexBack is offering a 100% deposit bonus for new users. This bonus allows users to double their funds instantly, enabling them to open larger positions with less capital, increasing their potential returns. But that’s not all – for first-time deposits of more than 0.01 BTC or 1000 USDT, users can receive an additional $100 trading bonus, adding to the exciting incentives for new and existing traders alike.

    Why Choose BexBack?

    • No KYC Required – Start trading instantly without the hassle of complex identity verification. We believe in providing a smooth experience for our users, with minimal barriers to entry.
    • 100x Leverage – Maximize your capital efficiency with up to 100x leverage, giving you the ability to trade larger positions and amplify potential profits. This means with only 1 BTC, you can hold a position equivalent to 100 BTC, providing immense trading power.
    • Double Deposit Bonus – Get a 100% deposit bonus immediately on your first deposit to help increase your trading power. You can use this bonus to open larger positions and better navigate market fluctuations.
    • $50 Welcome Bonus – New users who complete their first trade (open and close a position) are eligible for a $50 bonus, which can be used to offset losses and boost your trading experience.
    • No Deposit Fees – Enjoy zero fees on deposits, allowing you to keep more of your profits where they belong – in your account.
    • Advanced Trading Tools – Whether you’re a seasoned pro or a beginner, BexBack offers advanced tools and resources to help you maximize your trading success.

    Get Started with BexBack Today

    Ready to take advantage of no KYC, 100x leverage, and huge bonuses? Join BexBack today and start trading with greater power. With a variety of bonus offers and the ability to trade large positions with relatively small investments, there’s never been a better time to enter the world of crypto futures.

    Sign up today, claim your bonuses, and start trading with the power of leverage!

    About BexBack

    BexBack is a leading cryptocurrency derivatives platform offering 100x leverage on BTC, ETH, ADA, SOL, XRP, and more than 50 other major altcoins. Founded in May 2024, the platform has rapidly gained a reputation for providing a seamless trading experience with no KYC, competitive 100% deposit bonuses, and fast execution of trades. Trusted by over 500,000 users worldwide, BexBack is committed to delivering an easy, secure, and user-friendly platform for crypto traders everywhere.

    With a strong focus on customer service and offering 24/7 support, BexBack ensures traders have everything they need to succeed in the ever-evolving world of cryptocurrency.

    Ready to claim your bonuses and start trading? Don’t miss out on 100x leverage, double deposit bonuses, and $50 welcome bonus. Sign up now and start trading today on BexBack!


    Website: www.bexback.com

    Contact: business@bexback.com

    Contact:
    Amanda
    business@bexback.com

    Disclaimer: This content is provided by BexBack. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. We do not guarantee any claims, statements, or promises made in this article. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice.
    Investing in crypto and mining-related opportunities involves significant risks, including the potential loss of capital. It is possible to lose all your capital. These products may not be suitable for everyone, and you should ensure that you understand the risks involved. Seek independent advice if necessary. Speculate only with funds that you can afford to lose. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. However, due to the inherently speculative nature of the blockchain sector—including cryptocurrency, NFTs, and mining—complete accuracy cannot always be guaranteed.
    Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any fraudulent activities, misrepresentations, or financial losses arising from the content of this press release. In the event of any legal claims or charges against this article, we accept no liability or responsibility.

    Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an “as-is” basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above.

    Photos accompanying this announcement are available at

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/c0ea1fb8-aaf4-4719-96df-11532866da09

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/b7e808c5-051d-4c91-9aee-39e8c6c92556

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/af5b3a6b-5188-40d6-b6f4-7d1d7d2ea569

    https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1125a260-2359-4e48-a24f-645182f4b976

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Congress.gov New, Tip, and Top – April 2025

    Source: US Global Legal Monitor

    In our last Congress.gov release, we announced improved access to Congressional Research Service (CRS) products on Congress.gov. Building on those improvements, you can now filter your search results for CRS products by topic. You can also now set up a saved search email alert for CRS products and even download an audio file of a CRS product.

    In addition, in this release, we are enhancing access to historical Senate Executive Journals in Congress.gov. These journals are now available in a convenient, page-turner environment that allows you to flip through the pages sequentially and jump to a particular page. You can find the complete list of enhancements below.

    You can filter search results for CRS Products by topic on Congress.gov.

    Enhancements

    New – Historical Senate Executive Journals

    • Historical Senate Executive Journals from the 1st (1789 – 1791) through the 43rd Congress (1873 – 1875) are available to browse and search.
    • Find links to the Senate Executive Journal in the Congressional Activity section of the Browse page.
    • Using the search bar, select All Congresses and enter your word or phrase query. Check Senate Executive Journal under the Journals filter on your search results page.
    • Select a search result from the list to view a text version of the Senate Executive Journal page. Use the View Source Images link to display an image of the original print page.

    Enhancement – CRS Products – Search

    • Filter search results from the CRS Products landing page search form by topic.
    • Search results sorted by relevancy display active reports before archived reports.

    Enhancement – CRS Products – Saved Search Alerts

    • Include the CRS Products collection in your saved search and set up an alert to receive an email when a new CRS product matches your search query.

    Enhancement – CRS Products – ReadSpeaker

    • Download an audio file to listen to the text of any CRS Product at your convenience.

    Congress.gov Tip

    There are several different ways to search Congress.gov. How do you know which one is best for your research? Check out “How to Pick a Search Page.”

    Most-Viewed Bills

    The most-viewed bills for the week of April 13, 2025 are below.

    1. H.R.22 [119th] SAVE Act
    2. H.R.8281 [118th] SAVE Act
    3. H.Con.Res.14 [119th] Establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2025 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2026 through 2034.
    4. H.R.10127 [118th] Restoring Trade Fairness Act
    5. H.R.1526 [119th] NORRA of 2025
    6. H.R.1332 [118th] Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act
    7. H.R.2315 [119th] Fairness for High-Skilled Americans Act of 2025
    8. H.R.561 [119th] Overtime Pay Tax Relief Act of 2025
    9. H.Res.294 [119th] Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 18) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Overdraft Lending: Very Large Financial Institutions”; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 28) disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to “Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications”; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1526) to amend title 28, United States Code, to limit the authority of district courts to provide injunctive relief, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 22) to amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require proof of United States citizenship to register an individual to vote in elections for Federal office, and for other purposes; and for other purposes.
    10. H.R.482 [119th] No Tax on Tips Act

    Subscribe to In Custodia Legis – it’s free! – to receive interesting posts drawn from the Law Library of Congress’s vast collections and our staff’s expertise in U.S., foreign, and international law.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Economics: ASEAN, China strengthen commitment to advancing comprehensive strategic partnership

    Source: ASEAN – Association of SouthEast Asian Nations

    JAKARTA, 21 April 2025 – ASEAN and China reaffirmed their shared commitment to further advancing the ASEAN-China Comprehensive Strategic Partnership (CSP) at the 26th Meeting of the ASEAN-China Joint Cooperation Committee (ACJCC), held today at the ASEAN Headquarters/ASEAN Secretariat.
     
    China reaffirmed its steadfast support for ASEAN Community-building efforts and ASEAN’s central role in regional affairs. China also underscored ASEAN as a key priority on China’s neighbourhood diplomacy.
     
    During the meeting, both sides exchanged views on recent developments in ASEAN and China, and reviewed the progress of ASEAN-China CSP over the past year. Notable progress has been made in the final year of the implementation of the ASEAN-China Plan of Action (POA) 2021-2025 and its Annex to advance the CSP.
     
    Under the framework of the existing POA, ASEAN and China continued to strengthen cooperation across a wide range of areas such as non-traditional security, trade and investment, science and technology, green economy, digital ecosystems, agriculture and food security, clean energy, tourism, education, public health, culture, and disaster management.
     
    Under the ASEAN-China Year of People-to-People Exchanges 2025, both sides looked forward to various projects and activities to be conducted, to implement the ASEAN-China Joint Statement on Deepening Cooperation in People-to-People Exchanges adopted last year.
     
    The two sides also discussed other deliverables of ASEAN-China cooperation this year, including, among others, the expected signing of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA) 3.0 upgrade, the establishment of the ASEAN-China Tourism Ministers meeting, and the adoption of a new POA (2026-2030) to further advance the ASEAN-China CSP and contribute to the implementation of the ASEAN Community Vision 2045.
     
    China also put forward proposals for enhancing cooperation with ASEAN in maritime cooperation, artificial intelligence, transport, blue economy, women and children health, and environment.
     
    The Meeting was co-chaired by Permanent Representative of Malaysia to ASEAN, H.E. Sarah Al Bakri Devadason, and Ambassador of the People’s Republic of China to ASEAN, H.E. Hou Yanqi, and attended by Permanent Representatives of ASEAN Member States and representatives of the ASEAN Secretariat. Timor-Leste attended as Observer.
     
    *******
     

    MIL OSI Economics –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Varonis Announces Partnership With Pure Storage

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MIAMI and SANTA CLARA, Calif., April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Varonis Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: VRNS) today announced a new partnership with Pure Storage (NYSE: PSTG), a leading provider of advanced data storage technology and services. As the first data security company to natively integrate with Pure Storage, Varonis enables customers to proactively secure their sensitive data, detect threats, and comply with evolving data and AI privacy rules.

    Pure Storage enhances cyber resilience with immutable snapshots that allow rapid recovery after a cyber incident. Together, Varonis and Pure Storage deliver a powerful data security and cyber resilience solution that helps prevent data breaches and provides rapid recovery in the event of a disaster.

    By partnering, Varonis’ AI-powered platform enables Pure Storage customers to automatically:

    • Discover and classify sensitive data. Varonis scans data in Pure Storage FlashArray and FlashBlade systems in real time, matching classification results with identities, permissions, and activity to identify and fix exposed or at-risk data.
    • Reduce data exposure. Varonis maps complex permissions, such as nested groups and inheritance, right-sizes access, and automatically fixes excessive permissions, like removing over-privileged access.
    • Detect and stop threats. Varonis uses AI and machine learning to analyze user behavior to detect threats, suspicious activity, and malicious insiders. With Varonis Managed Data Detection and Response (MDDR), Pure Storage customers can extend their teams with a 24x7x365 incident response SLA.

    “Ensuring the security of data — and the data powering AI — is challenging and critical,” said Varonis EVP of Engineering and CTO David Bass. “More and more customers rely on Pure Storage to harness the full potential of their AI data, from ingestion to inference. Customers love Pure Storage, and we are thrilled to partner to ensure that they can innovate with AI securely.”

    “In a world where ransomware risk continues to rise, ensuring data security and resilience is more critical than ever,” said Pure Storage VP of Enterprise Growth and Solutions Dan Kogan. “With this partnership, Pure Storage and Varonis are empowering organizations to proactively secure critical and sensitive data, detect threats, and recover rapidly from cyber incidents. By combining Pure Storage’s layered resilience approach and indelible snapshots with Varonis’ intelligent data security, customers can confidently protect their unstructured data, mitigate risk, and maintain uninterrupted operations.”

    Both companies have been recognized as industry leaders. Pure Storage is a Leader in the 2024 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Primary Storage Platforms. Varonis is a Leader and a Customer Favorite in The Forrester Wave™: Data Security Platforms, Q1 2025.

    Additional Resources

    About Varonis

    Varonis (Nasdaq: VRNS) is the leader in data security, fighting a different battle than conventional cybersecurity companies. Our cloud-native Data Security Platform continuously discovers and classifies critical data, removes exposures, and detects advanced threats with AI-powered automation.

    Thousands of organizations worldwide trust Varonis to defend their data wherever it lives — across SaaS, IaaS, and hybrid cloud environments. Customers use Varonis to automate a wide range of security outcomes, including data security posture management (DSPM), data classification, data access governance (DAG), data detection and response (DDR), data loss prevention (DLP), AI security, and insider risk management.

    Varonis protects data first, not last. Learn more at www.varonis.com.

    About Pure Storage

    Pure Storage (NYSE: PSTG) delivers the industry’s most advanced data storage platform to store, manage, and protect the world’s data at any scale. With Pure Storage, organizations have ultimate simplicity and flexibility, saving time, money, and energy. From AI to archive, Pure Storage delivers a cloud experience with one unified Storage as-a-Service platform across on premises, cloud, and hosted environments. Our platform is built on our Evergreen architecture that evolves with your business – always getting newer and better with zero planned downtime, guaranteed. Our customers are actively increasing their capacity and processing power while significantly reducing their carbon and energy footprint. It’s easy to fall in love with Pure Storage, as evidenced by the highest Net Promoter Score in the industry. For more information, visit www.purestorage.com.

    Pure Storage, the Pure Storage P Logo, Pure Realize, Pure1, FlashBlade//EXA, and the marks in the Pure Storage Trademark List are trademarks or registered trademarks of Pure Storage Inc. in the U.S. and/or other countries. The Trademark List can be found at purestorage.com/trademarks. Other names may be trademarks of their respective owners.

    Investor Relations Contact:
    Tim Perz
    Varonis Systems, Inc.
    646-640-2112
    investors@varonis.com

    News Media Contact:
    Rachel Hunt
    Varonis Systems, Inc.
    877-292-8767 (ext. 1598)
    pr@varonis.com 

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: American Rebel Light Beer Partners with Charlotte Motor Speedway to be Title Sponsor of American Rebel Light NHRA 4-Wide Nationals

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Nashville, TN, April 21, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AREB) (“American Rebel” or the “Company”), creator of American Rebel Beer (americanrebelbeer.com) and a designer, manufacturer, and marketer of branded safes, personal security and self-defense products and apparel (americanrebel.com), is thrilled to announce its title sponsorship of the American Rebel Light NHRA 4-Wide Nationals at Charlotte Motor Speedway. This exciting collaboration marks a milestone in the brand’s journey to connect with motorsports enthusiasts across the nation.

    The American Rebel Light NHRA 4-Wide Nationals is one of the most anticipated events in drag racing, showcasing the thrill and intensity of the sport as racers go 4 wide at over 300 miles an hour. With American Rebel Light as the title sponsor, fans can expect a weekend packed with adrenaline-pumping action and patriotic punch.

    “As a brand dedicated to celebrating the American spirit, we couldn’t be more excited to sponsor such an iconic event,” said Todd Porter, President of American Rebel Beverage. “The American Rebel Light NHRA 4-Wide Nationals represents the perfect platform for us to engage with our audience, support motorsports, and share our exceptional beer with racing fans everywhere.”

    “American Rebel is honored to be named entitlement sponsor for the American Rebel Light NHRA 4-Wide Nationals at zMAX Dragway on the Charlotte Motor Speedway property,” said American Rebel CEO Andy Ross. “It’s also an honor to be the entitlement sponsor for the 1,000th Top Fuel event and celebrate that milestone with the NHRA. We’ve been sponsoring Tony Stewart Racing and the Matt Hagan Funny Car for three seasons now and the relationship with Tony, Leah, Matt and everyone in the wider NHRA family has been extraordinary. Our racing marketing program has opened many doors and helped establish numerous critical associations that have advanced American Rebel Beer. Being the title sponsor at Charlotte Motor Speedway will roll out American Rebel Beer in North Carolina in a big way. The only thing better than a weekend at the track and celebrating in victory lane with a cold Rebel Light is bringing the party. I’ll be performing a concert on the midway at the track between Nitro Qualifying Sessions #3 & #4.”

    American Rebel Light will be featured prominently at the event with branded signage all throughout the track, a promotional party tent, and opportunities for fans to sample the beer. In addition, the company plans to host exclusive promotions and giveaways that highlight its commitment to quality and connection.

    The American Rebel Light NHRA 4-Wide Nationals will take place April 25 – 27 at the Charlotte Motor Speedway, promising three days of unforgettable racing action. Tickets are available now at American Rebel Light NHRA 4-Wide Nationals Tickets | Events | Charlotte Motor Speedway.

    About American Rebel Light:

    American Rebel Light is more than just a beer—it’s a celebration of freedom, passion, and quality. Brewed with care and precision, our light beer delivers a refreshing taste that’s perfect for every occasion.

    For more information about American Rebel Light and its sponsorship of the American Rebel Light NHRA 4-Wide Nationals, visit American Rebel Light NHRA 4-Wide Nationals | Events | Charlotte Motor Speedway or follow us on social media @AmericanRebelBeer.

    Since its launch in September 2024, American Rebel Light Beer has rolled out in Tennessee, Connecticut, Kansas, Kentucky, Ohio, Iowa, Missouri and North Carolina and is adding new distributors and territories regularly. For more information about the launch events and the availability of American Rebel Beer, please visit americanrebelbeer.com or follow us on our social media platforms.

    Produced in partnership with AlcSource, American Rebel Light Beer (americanrebelbeer.com) is a domestic premium light lager celebrated for its exceptional quality and patriotic values. It stands out as America’s Patriotic, God-Fearing, Constitution-Loving, National Anthem-Singing, Stand Your Ground Beer.

    American Rebel Light is a Premium Domestic Light Lager Beer – All Natural, Crisp, Clean and Bold Taste with a Lighter Feel. With approximately 100 calories, 3.2 carbohydrates, and 4.3% alcoholic content per 12 oz serving, American Rebel Light Beer delivers a lighter option for those who love great beer but prefer a more balanced lifestyle. It’s all natural with no added supplements and importantly does not use corn, rice, or other sweeteners typically found in mass produced beers.

    About American Rebel Holdings, Inc.

    American Rebel Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: AREB) has operated primarily as a designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded safes and personal security and self-defense products and has recently transitioned into the beverage industry through the introduction of American Rebel Light Beer. The Company also designs and produces branded apparel and accessories. To learn more, visit americanrebel.com and americanrebelbeer.com. For investor information, visit americanrebelbeer.com/investor-relations.

    American Rebel Holdings, Inc.
    info@americanrebel.com

    American Rebel Beverages, LLC
    Todd Porter, President
    tporter@americanrebelbeer.com

    Forward-Looking Statements

    This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. American Rebel Holdings, Inc., (NASDAQ: AREB; AREBW) (the “Company,” “American Rebel,” “we,” “our” or “us”) desires to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and is including this cautionary statement in connection with this safe harbor legislation. The words “forecasts” “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “should,” “plan,” “could,” “target,” “potential,” “is likely,” “expect” and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements primarily on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, and financial needs. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements include benefits of a launch party, actual launch timing and availability of American Rebel Beer, success and availability of the promotional activities, our ability to effectively execute our business plan, and the Risk Factors contained within our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. Any forward-looking statement made by us herein speaks only as of the date on which it is made. Factors or events that could cause our actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of them. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by law.

    Company Contact:
    tporter@americanrebelbeer.com
    info@americanrebel.com

    Media Contact:
    Matt Sheldon
    Matt@PrecisionPR.co

    Attachment

    • American Rebel Holdings Inc

    The MIL Network –

    April 22, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: TELECOM REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF INDIA

    Source: Government of India

    Posted On: 21 APR 2025 2:57PM by PIB Delhi

    Highlights of Telecom Subscription Data as on 31st January, 2025

     

    Particulars

    Wireless

    Wireline

    Total

    (Wireless+

    Wireline)

    Broadband Subscribers (Million)

    904.02*

    41.15

    945.16

    Urban Telephone Subscribers (Million)

    631.60*

    32.24$

    663.83

         Net Addition in January, 2025 (Million)

    5.17

    -4.06

    1.11

         Monthly Growth Rate

    0.82%

    -11.18%

    0.17%

    Rural Telephone Subscribers (Million)

    525.41*

    2.79$

    528.20

         Net Addition in January, 2025 (Million)

    1.18

    -0.18

    0.99

         Monthly Growth Rate

    0.23%

    -6.21%

    0.19%

    Total Telephone Subscribers (Million)

    1157.00*

    35.03$

    1192.03

         Net Addition in January, 2025 (Million)

    6.35

    -4.24

    2.10

         Monthly Growth Rate

    0.55%

    -10.80%$

    0.18%

    Overall Tele-density@(%)

    82.06%

    2.48%

    84.54%

         Urban Tele-density@(%)

    125.02%

    6.38%

    131.40%

         Rural Tele-density@(%)

    58.07%

    0.31%

    58.38%

    Share of Urban Subscribers

    54.59%

    92.03%

    55.69%

    Share of Rural Subscribers

    45.41%

    7.97%

    44.31%

    1. In the month of January 2025, 14.14 million subscribers submitted their requests for Mobile Number Portability (MNP). With this, the cumulative MNP requests increased from 1079.19 million at the end of December-24 to 1093.33 million at the end of January-25, since implementation of MNP.
    1. Number of active wireless (Mobile) subscribers (on the date of peak VLR#) in January 2025 was 1065.01 million.

     

    Note:

    1. *   Wireless includes 5G FWA subscription also. 
    2. $ Decrease in wireline Telephone subscription is due to accounting of 5G FWA Telephone subscription under wireless w.e.f Januray’2025, earlier being erroneously reported under wireline. 
    3. @ Based on the projection of population from the ‘Report of the Technical Group on Population Projections for India and States 2011 – 2036’.   
    4. # VLR is acronym of Visitor Location Register. The dates of peak VLR for various TSPs are different in different service areas.
    5. The Urban/Rural subscribers, net addition & monthly growth have been calculated considering the revised Subscribers reported by BSNL for the month of December 2024.
    6. Information in this Press Release is based on the data provided by the Service Providers.
    1. Broadband Subscribers

     

    • As per the information received from 1180 operators in January 2025, in comparison to 1192 operators in December 2024, the total Broadband Subscribers increased from 944.96 million at the end of December-24 to 945.16 million at the end of January-25 with a monthly growth rate of 0.04%. Segment-wise broadband subscribers and their monthly growth rates are as below: –

    Segment–wise Broadband Subscribers and Monthly Growth Rate in the month of January, 2025

    Segment

    Subscription

    Subscribers

    (in million)

    % Change

    Dec-24

    Jan-25

    Wired subscribers

    Fixed (wired) Broadband

    (DSL, FTTx, Ethernet/LAN, Cable Modem, ILL)

    41.19

    41.15

    -0.09%*

    Wireless Subscribers

    Fixed Wireless Broadband

    (FWA-5G, Wi-Fi, Wi-Max, Radio, Satellite)

    5.21

    4.98

    -4.39%

    Mobile Broadband

    (Handset/Dongle based)

    898.57

    899.04

    0.05%

    Total Broadband Subscribers

    944.96

    945.16*

    0.04%

     

      * This report is prepared considering the last reported (Nov’2024) internet subscription data submitted by M/s Reliance Jio Infocom Ltd. and M/s Bharti Airtel Ltd., as they did not submit the requisite data in the prescribed format for Dec-2024 & Jan-2025.

     

    As on 31st January 2025, top five Broadband

    (Wired + Wireless) Service providers

     

    S.N.

    Name of the Service Provider

    Subscriber base

    (In million)

    1.  

    Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd

    476.58*

    1.  

    Bharti Airtel Ltd.

    289.31*

    1.  

    Vodafone Idea Ltd.

    126.41

    1.  

    Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.

    35.77

    1.  

    Atria Convergence Technologies Limited

    2.28

    Market Share of Top Five Broadband (Wired+Wireless)

    98.43%

    *As per reported data of Nov-24

    • The graphical representation of the service provider-wise market share of broadband services is given below: –

    Service Provider-wise Market Share of Broadband

    (wired + wireless) Services as on 31st January, 2025

     

    As on 31st January, 2025, Top Five Fixed (Wired) Broadband Service providers

    S.N.

    Name of the Service Provider

    Subscriber base

    (In million)

    1.  

    Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd

    11.48*

    1.  

    Bharti Airtel Ltd

    8.55*

    1.  

    Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

    4.26

    1.  

    Atria Convergence Technologies Limited

    2.28

    1.  

    Kerala Vision Broadband Ltd

    1.28

    Market Share of Top Five Fixed (Wired) Broadband Service Providers

    67.67%

    *As per reported data of Nov-24

     

    As on 31st January, 2025, top five Wireless (Fixed wireless & mobile) Broadband Service providers

    S.N.

    Name of the Service Provider

    Subscriber base

    (In million)

    1.  

    Reliance Jio Infocomm Ltd

    465.10*

    1.  

    Bharti Airtel Ltd

    280.76*

    1.  

    Vodafone Idea Ltd

    126.41

    1.  

    Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd

    31.52

    1.  

    Intech Online Pvt. Ltd

    0.09

    Market Share of Top Five Wireless Broadband Service Providers

    99.98%

    *As per reported data of Nov-24

    1. Wireline Subscribers
    • Wireline subscribers decreased from 39.27 million on December 24 to 35.03 million on January 25. Hence, the net decrease in the wireline subscriber base was 4.24 million with a monthly rate of decline -10.80%. This decrease is due to the accounting of 5G FWA subscribers’ numbers earlier being erroneously reported under the wireline category but now being accounted for under the wireless category w.e.f January 2025.
    • The Overall wireline Tele-density in India decreased from 2.79% at the end of December 24 to 2.48% at the end of January 25. Urban and Rural Wireline Tele-density were 6.38% and 0.31%, respectively, during the same period.  The share of urban and rural subscribers in total wireline subscribers was 92.03% and 7.97% respectively at the end of January 2025.
    • BSNL, MTNL, and APSFL, the three PSUs access service providers, held 24.77% of the wireline market share as on 31st January 2025. Detailed statistics of the Wireline subscriber base are available at Annexure-I.

     

    Access Service Provider-wise Market Share of wireline Subscribers

    as on 31st January, 2025

     

    Access Service Provider-wise Net Addition/Decline in wireline Subscribers during the month of January, 2025

     

     

    1. Wireless (Mobile + 5G FWA) Subscribers

     

    • Total wireless subscribers increased from 1,150.66 million (Mobile) on December-24 to 1,157 million (mobile + 5G FWA) on January-25, thereby registering a monthly growth rate of 0.55%. 5G FWA subscribers’ number, earlier being reported under the wireline category, has now been included in the wireless category w.e.f January 2025. Hence, due to the inclusion of 5G FWA subscriber numbers, there is an increase in the monthly growth rate. Total Wireless subscription in urban areas increased from 627.08 million on December 24 to 631.60 million on January 25, while the subscription in rural areas increased from 523.28 million to 525.41 million during the same period. The monthly growth rate of urban and rural wireless subscriptions was 0.82% and 0.23%, respectively.

             

    •  The Wireless Tele-density in India increased from 81.67% at the end of Dec-24 to 82.06% at the end of Jan-25. The Urban Wireless Tele-density increased from 124.31% at the end of Dec-24 to 125.02% at the end of Jan-25 and the Rural Tele-density increased from 57.89% to 58.07% during the same period. The share of urban and rural wireless subscribers in the total number of wireless subscribers was 54.59% and 45.41%, respectively, at the end of January 25.
    • The details of Wireless (mobile) and Wireless (5G FWA) subscribers are detailed below: –

     

    (A) Wireless (Mobile) subscriber

     

    • Total wireless (Mobile) subscribers increased from 1,150.66 million at the end of December-24 to 1,151.29 million at the end of January-25, thereby registering a monthly growth rate of 0.05%. Wireless (Mobile) subscription in urban areas decreased from 627.08 million at the end of Dec-24 to 626.08 million at the end of Jan-25, however wireless (Mobile) subscription in rural areas increased from 523.28 million to 525.20 million during the same period. Monthly growth rate of urban and rural wireless (Mobile) subscription was -0.06% and 0.19% respectively.

     

            

    • The Wireless (Mobile) Tele-density in India decreased from 81.67% at the end of Dec-24 to 81.65% at the end of Jan-25. The Urban Wireless Tele-density decreased from 124.31% at the end of Dec-24 to 123.92% at the end of Jan-25, however Rural Tele-density increased from 57.89% to 58.05% during the same period. The share of urban and rural wireless (Mobile) subscribers in total number of wireless (Mobile) subscribers was 54.38% and 45.62% respectively at the end of January-25. Detailed statistics of wireless (Mobile) subscriber base is available at Annexure-II

    •      As on 31st January 2025, the private access service providers held 91.96% market share of the wireless (Mobile) subscribers, whereas BSNL and MTNL, the two PSU access service providers, had a market share of only 8.04%.

    • The graphical representation of access service provider-wise market share and net additions in wireless (Mobile) subscriber base are given below: –

     

    Access Service Provider-wise Market Shares in term of Wireless (Mobile) Subscribers as on 31st January, 2025

     

     

     

    Net Addition/ Decline in Wireless (Mobile) Subscribers of Access Service Providers in the month of January 2025

     

    Growth in Wireless (Mobile) Subscribers

    Major Access Service Provider-wise Monthly Growth/ Decline Rate of Wireless Subscribers in the month of January, 2025

     

               

    Service Area-wise Monthly Growth/ Decline Rate of Wireless (Mobile) Subscribers in the month of January 2025

     

     

    • Except Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, U.P.(W), Maharashtra, Delhi, West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, J & K and Kolkata, all other service areas have showed growth in their wireless (Mobile) subscribers during the month of January-25.

     

    (B) Wireless (5G FWA) subscribers

     

    • Total wireless (5G FWA) subscribers were 5.72 million at the end of January 25, with subscriptions in urban and rural areas of 5.513 million and 0.202 million, respectively.
    • The share of urban and rural wireless (5G FWA) subscribers in the total number of wireless (5G FWA) subscribers was 96.46% and 3.54%, respectively at the end of January 25. Detailed statistics of the wireless (5G FWA) subscriber base is available at Annexure-V
    1. M2M cellular mobile connections

       Number of M2M cellular mobile connections increased from 59.09 million at the end of December-24 to 63.09 million at the end of January-25.

     

     

         Bharti Airtel Limited has the highest number of M2M cellular mobile connections 33.04 million with a market share of 52.37% followed by Vodafone idea Limited, Reliance Jio Infocom Limited and BSNL with market share of 25.07%, 17.40% and 5.16% respectively.

     

    1.  Total Telephone Subscribers

     

    • The number of total telephone subscribers in India increased from 1,189.92 million at the end of Dec-24 to 1,192.03 million at the end of Jan-25, thereby showing a monthly growth rate of 0.18%. Urban telephone subscription increased from 663.37 million at the end of Dec-24 to 663.83 million at the end of Jan-25 and the rural subscription also increased from 526.56 million to 528.20 million during the same period. The monthly growth rates of urban and rural telephone subscription were 0.17% and   0.19% respectively during the month of January-25.  
    • The overall Tele-density in India increased from 84.45% at the end of Dec-24 to 84.54% at the end of Jan-25. The Urban Tele-density decreased from 131.50% at the end of Dec-24 to 131.40% at the end of Jan-25 however Rural Tele-density increased from 58.22% to 58.38% during the same period. The share of urban and rural subscribers in total number of telephone subscribers at the end of January-25 were 55.69% and 44.31% respectively.

     

    Overall Tele-density (LSA Wise) – As on 31st January, 2025

     

     

    • As may be seen in the above chart, eight LSA have less tele-density than the all-India average tele-density at the end of January-25. Delhi service area has maximum tele-density of 274.17% and the Bihar service area has minimum tele-density of 56.63% at the end of January-25.

    Notes: –

    1. Population data/projections are available state wise only.
    2. Tele-density figures are derived from the telephone subscriber data provided by the access service providers and the projection of population from the “Report of the Technical Group on Population Projections for India and States 2011 – 2036.
    3. Telephone subscriber data for Delhi, includes, apart from the data for the State of Delhi, wireless subscriber data for the areas served by the local exchanges of Ghaziabad & Noida (in Uttar Pradesh) and Gurgaon & Faridabad (in Haryana).
    4. Data/information for West Bengal includes Kolkata, Maharashtra includes Mumbai and Uttar Pradesh includes UPE & UPW service area(s).
    5. Data/information for Andhra Pradesh includes Telengana, Madhya Pradesh includes Chhatishgarh, Bihar includes Jharkhand, Maharashtra includes Goa, Uttar Pradesh includes Uttarakhand, West Bengal includes Sikkim and North-East includes Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland & Tripura States.

     

    1. Category-wise Growth in subscriber base

     

    Circle Category-wise Net Additions in Telephone Subscribers in the month January, 2025

              

    Circle

    Category

    Net additions in the month of January, 2025

    Telephone Subscriber base as on 31st January, 2025

    Wireline segment

    Wireless* segment

    Wireline segment

    Wireless* segment

    Circle A

    -1540337

    1906719

    13539282

    385483296

    Circle B

    -1654918

    2568517

    9512781

    468875300

    Circle C

    -654284

    1250544

    2744860

    189962742

    Metro

    -391829

    619569

    9229730

    112680644

    All India

    -4241368

    6345349

    35026653

    1157001982

              *Wireless includes 5G FWA subscription also

     

    Circle Category-wise monthly and yearly Growth Rates in Telephone Subscribers in the month of January, 2025

     

     

    Circle Category

    Monthly growth rate (%)

    (December-24 to January-25)

    Yearly growth rate (%)

    (January-24 to January-25)

    Wireline Segment

    Wireless* Segment

    Wireline Segment

    Wireless* Segment

    Circle A

    -10.21%

    0.50%

    6.59%

    -0.54%

    Circle B

    -14.82%

    0.55%

    11.42%

    -0.56%

    Circle C

    -19.25%

    0.66%

    11.64%

    1.46%

    Metro

    -4.07%

    0.55%

    4.39%

    -1.49%

    All India

    -10.80%

    0.55%

    7.64%

    -0.32%

     

    *Wireless includes 5G FWA subscription also

     

    Note:  Circle Category-Metro includes Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata. Data for Chennai has been included in Circle Category-A, as part of TamilNadu.

     

    • As can be seen in the above tables, in the wireless segment, during the month of January 2025, on a monthly basis, all circles have registered a growth rate in their subscriber base. On a yearly basis, except Circle ‘C’, all other circles have registered a decline in their subscriber base.
    •  In the Wireline segment, during the month of January 2025, on a monthly basis, all circles have registered a decline in their subscriber base while on a yearly basis, all circles have registered growth in their subscribers.

     

    1.  Active Wireless (Mobile) Subscribers (VLR Data)

     

     

    • Out of the total 1151.29 million wireless subscribers, 1065.01 million wireless subscribers were active on the date of peak VLR in the month of January-25. The proportion of active wireless subscribers was approximately 92.51% of the total wireless subscriber base.
    • The detailed statistics on proportion of active wireless subscribers (also referred to as VLR subscribers) on the date of peak VLR in the month of January-25 is available at Annexure-III and the methodology used for reporting VLR subscribers is available at Annexure-IV.

     

    Access Service Provider-wise Percentage of VLR Subscribers

    in the month of January, 2025       

     

     

    •  Reliance Communication has the maximum proportion 100% of its active wireless subscribers (VLR) as against its total wireless subscribers (HLR) on the date of peak VLR in the month of  January-25 and MTNL has the minimum proportion of VLR 48.31% of its HLR during the same period.

     

    Service Area wise percentage of VLR Subscribers

    in the month of January, 2025

     

     

    1. Mobile Number Portability (MNP)

     

    • Intra-service area Mobile number portability (MNP) was implemented first in Haryana service area w.e.f. 25.11.2010 and in the rest of the country w.e.f. 20.01.2011. Inter-Service Area MNP has been implemented in the country w.e.f. 03.07.2015. Now, the wireless telephone subscribers can retain their mobile numbers when they relocate from one service area to another.
    • During the month of January-25, a total of 14.14 million requests were received for MNP.  Out of total 14.14 million, new requests received from Zone-I & Zone-II were 8.16 million and 5.98 million respectively. The cumulative MNP requests increased from 1079.19 million at the end of December-24 to 1093.33 million at the end of January-25, since the implementation of MNP. 
    • In MNP Zone-I (Northern and Western India), the highest number of requests till date have been received in Uttar Pradesh-East (about 108.37 million) followed by Maharashtra (about 89.08 million) service area.
    • In MNP Zone-II (Southern and Eastern India), the highest number of requests till date have been received in Madhya Pradesh (about 86.03 million) followed by Karnataka (about 72.50 million).

    Service Area Wise MNP Status

    Zone-I

    Zone–II

    Service Area

    Number of Porting Requests (in Million)

    Service Area

    Number of Porting Requests

    (in Million)

    Dec-24

    Jan-25

    Dec-24

    Jan-25

    Delhi

    51.42

    52.09

    Andhra Pradesh

    70.86

    71.50

    Gujarat

    73.42

    74.40

    Assam

    7.89

    7.99

    Haryana

    33.99

    34.41

    Bihar

    61.90

    62.94

    Himachal Pradesh

    4.55

    4.60

    Karnataka

    71.94

    72.50

    Jammu & Kashmir

    3.03

    3.11

    Kerala

    25.65

    25.90

    Maharashtra

    87.99

    89.08

    Kolkata

    19.63

    19.83

    Mumbai

    35.43

    35.73

    Madhya Pradesh

    84.71

    86.03

    Punjab

    35.34

    35.69

    North East

    2.48

    2.50

    Rajasthan

    72.50

    73.24

    Odisha

    18.87

    19.07

    U.P.(East)

    106.35

    108.37

    Tamil Nadu

    67.56

    68.14

    U.P.(West)

    79.94

    81.41

    West Bengal

    63.74

    64.82

    Total

    583.96

    592.12

    Total

    495.23

    501.21

    Total (Zone-I + Zone-II)

     

     

    1,079.19

    1,093.33

    Net Addition (January, 2025)

                                              14.14 million

     

     

    Contact details in         case of any clarification: –

    Shri Vijay Kumar, Advisor (F&EA),

    Telecom Regulatory Authority of India                                                                 

    World Trade Centre, Tower-F,

    Nauroji Nagar, New Delhi – 110029

    Ph: 011-20907773                                                        (Atul Kumar Chaudhary)

    E-mail: advfea1@trai.gov.in                                                  Secretary, TRAI

     

              

        Note: BSNL has revised the no. of rural subscribers from 29,300,726 to 29,946,250 for the month of December, 2024

        

    Note: Peak VLR figures in some circles of some of the service providers are more than their HLR  figures due to a large number of inroamers.            

     

    Annexure IV

    VLR Subscribers in the Wireless Segment

     

    Home Location Register (HLR) is a central database that contains details of each mobile phone subscriber that is authorized to use the GSM core network. The HLRs store details of every SIM card issued by the service provider. Each SIM has a unique identifier called an International Mobile Subscriber Identity (IMSI), which is the primary key to each HLR record. The HLR data is stored for as long as a subscriber remains with the service provider. HLR also manages the mobility of subscribers by means of updating their position in administrative areas. It sends the subscriber data to a Visitor Location Register (VLR).

    Subscriber numbers reported by the service providers is the difference between the numbers of IMSI registered in service provider’s HLR and sum of other figures as given below: –

     

    1

    Total IMSI’s in HLR (A)

    2

    Less: (B = a + b + c + d + e)

    a.

    Test/Service Cards

    b.

    Employees

    c.

    Stock in hand/in Distribution Channels (Active Card)

    d.

    Subscriber Retention period expired

    e.

    Service suspended pending disconnection

    3

    Subscribers Base (A-B)

    Visitor Location Register (VLR) is a temporary database of the subscribers who have roamed into the particular area, which it serves. Each base station in the network is served by exactly one VLR; hence a subscriber cannot be present in more than one VLR at a time.

    If subscriber is in active stage i.e. he is able to send/receive calls/SMSs he is available both in HLR and VLR. However, it may be possible that the subscriber is registered in HLR but not in VLR due to the reason that he is either switched-off or moved out of coverage area, not reachable etc. In such circumstances he will be available in HLR but not in VLR. This causes difference between subscriber number reported by the service providers based on HLR and numbers available in VLR.

    The VLR subscriber data calculated here is based on active subscribers in VLR on the date of Peak subscriber number in VLR of the particular month for which the data is being collected. This data is to be taken from the switches having the purge time of not more than 72 hours.

    **********

    Samrat

    (Release ID: 2123143) Visitor Counter : 70

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    April 21, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 195 196 197 198 199 … 410
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress