Category: Banking

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Financial News: Interview with Ekaterina Abasheeva for RBC Investments

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Central Bank of Russia –

    Rating agencies will assign stars to shares of Russian companies.

    RBC Investments discussed with Ekaterina Abasheeva, head of the Central Bank’s corporate relations department, topics that are of greatest interest to private investors: stock ratings and disclosure of information during an IPO.

    Over the past year, the Bank of Russia has launched several large-scale reforms aimed at increasing the transparency of the Russian market.

    Stock Ratings: Russian Analogue of Morningstar

    There are currently two major problems: a lack of quality analytics on companies, as well as the unavailability of information on a number of issuers. In these conditions, a discussion arose about creating stock ratings – a product that, on the one hand, would allow us to tell more about the issuer, and on the other, to identify a range of attractive stocks, noted Abasheeva.

    “In the summer of 2025, we plan to launch a pilot project of non-credit ratings of shares of Russian issuers, which is expected to reach full capacity in 2026. The idea is that rating agencies will act as a kind of provider of independent assessments of the fair value of the issuer. It will be determined on the basis of both financial and non-financial metrics. Ideally, over time, the market price should converge with the expert assessment. The rating of shares will be the Russian analogue of the Morningstar project, which has been offering a similar rating product in North America, Europe and Asia for over 30 years. Agencies will assign stars to shares and accompany the ratings with advanced analytics. Thus, investors will receive a transparent and professional guideline on the basis of which they will be able to make investment decisions,” the head of the department explains the idea.

    Who will be giving grades?

    At the stage of developing the idea of stock ratings, the Bank of Russia considered various options for who would evaluate issuers. “There was an idea to create a new participant in the market that would provide an analytical service. However, it seemed more expensive to us, since it requires the development of new regulations,” says Abasheeva.

    An alternative approach is to use the ready-made infrastructure of rating agencies, since they already have experience in the securities market and have proven themselves as independent experts who have earned the trust of issuers and investors. The head of the department notes that the Central Bank held a series of meetings with agencies, where they discussed all the pros and cons: why they can offer a new product.

    “We were worried about the discrepancy between the expert assessment and the actual value of the rated entity. And of course, disputes arose over what responsibility the agencies would bear,” she continues. “It seems that the combination of independence, competence and responsibility of the agencies is best suited for the assessment of equity instruments. Now that all the discussions are behind us, the rating agencies have begun to develop methodologies for a new category of ratings. We intend to pilot the project on their basis.”

    It is planned that one issuer will be able to receive several ratings from different rating agencies: “Stocks are a very volatile and poorly predictable instrument. Obviously, the dispersion of opinions here, it seems to me, is more important than in relation to bonds, where the ratings are more homogeneous. Therefore, of course, we ideally expected that there would be at least two opinions on stocks from different rating agencies.”

    If the agencies’ assessments differ dramatically and send conflicting signals to investors, this could prompt the Central Bank to consider minimum requirements for analysts – their methodologies and the information they use, she adds. However, this will become clear after preliminary testing of the ratings on the initial pool of issuers. Key parameters for assessing companies

    According to Ekaterina Abasheeva, at least two rating agencies have already developed and presented their methodologies to issuers and professional analysts. They are based on the model fair value of the issuer, she notes, but other factors that distinguish shares from debt instruments are also taken into account.

    This primarily concerns non-financial factors. This is the quality of corporate management, as well as the protection of investors’ interests. In addition, rating agencies will be required to pay attention to the issuer’s information sensitive to foreign sanctions, says the department director.

    The final set of parameters may include more factors, since the regulator does not plan to set strict requirements for methodologies at the pilot stage of the project, adds Abasheeva. “The criteria for the quality of corporate governance can take into account possible violations of the law by the issuer and complaints from shareholders,” she gives examples. Shares will have stars

    In the matter of how to display ratings, the Bank of Russia, together with rating agencies, did not reinvent the wheel and followed the path of the existing rating system. Star ratings are widely used to evaluate not only financial products, but also restaurants, hotels and films, notes Ekaterina Abasheeva. At the same time, the disclosure of the symbolic assessment will be accompanied by the publication of a full investment report, as well as a press release as its shortened version, she adds.

    “The combination of the rating and the report, on the one hand, will allow the investor to quickly navigate the information about the issuer. On the other hand, having analytical support, it is possible to better understand what caused the assignment of a particular rating,” explains the head of the department.

    The Central Bank plans to update the stock rating more frequently than bonds, since stocks are more volatile. However, the regulator believes that the main thing here is not to overdo it, and proposes to tie the publication of updated ratings to the release of IFRS reporting – this is approximately once every six months.

    When will the first stock ratings appear?

    Considering that the working version of the rating agencies’ methodologies has already been prepared, the launch of ratings in pilot mode with the participation of the first issuers is expected in the summer, Abasheeva shares her plans. “We expect the first test assessments based on the methodologies prepared by the agencies to appear in 2025, and in 2026 we plan to analyze the experience gained and understand how we can move forward with the development of the new product,” she predicts. Will ratings be mandatory for companies?

    Abasheeva says that issuers have responded positively to the idea of stock ratings, and some of them have expressed a desire to participate in the pilot project.

    The department director emphasized that the Central Bank assumes that in the near future the presence of a stock rating will become mandatory for a certain type of company. This primarily concerns issuers that do not disclose information due to sanctions risks. “We consider them as potential subjects of regulation. It is important that the rating indirectly tells about the company what it cannot tell about itself due to sanctions problems. But this will definitely not happen at the start, but when we understand that the product has become operational,” she explained.

    A small group of companies will participate in the pilot in 2025. By the end of the year, rating agencies have agreed to test stock ratings free of charge, says Abasheeva.

    According to the regulator, the issuers that demonstrate the best practices in information disclosure and corporate governance will be primarily interested in the stock ratings. For them, the Bank of Russia, together with the Moscow Exchange, has launched a program to increase shareholder value. “Participation in the program will allow investors and shareholders to form an idea of the issuer’s current business, expectations for the stock price and dividend payments. The rating will serve as expert confirmation of the investment attractiveness of the companies,” she explains.

    Transparency of issuers during IPOs

    The second important reform initiated by the Bank of Russia is aimed at increasing the transparency of the IPO procedure. At the end of January 2025, the regulator presented a report for public consultations “Information Transparency in the Securities Market: Issuers and Conditions for the Initial Public Offering of Their Shares”. The document included proposals to improve the information quality of placements, change the content of information disclosed by issuers and adapt it to the needs of retail investors.

    Over the course of a month, the regulator met with market participants to collect feedback and discuss proposals. According to Ekaterina Abasheeva, the most sensitive and controversial proposals were the proposals to include forecast indicators in the issue prospectus, the presence of two reports from independent analysts when a company goes public, and the definition of the role and responsibility of placement organizers. In the rest of the proposals in the advisory report, the Central Bank received support from investors, issuers, and placement organizers, she added.

    Forecast indicators

    The Bank of Russia believes that if a company publicly broadcasts forecasted performance indicators in its IPO marketing materials, they must correspond to what is disclosed in the securities prospectus, notes Abasheeva. According to her, companies can now describe the “best prospects” for their development in advertising materials. The investor has no choice but to focus on them, since there are simply no others. “We want to change the situation. It is important that the forecast indicators disclosed by issuers reflect reality – you can’t highlight only the good and hide under the carpet what is not in the issuer’s favor,” explained Ekaterina Abasheeva.

    The minimum set of forecast data in the prospectus may include revenue, net profit or loss, net profit per share, and return on equity. Issuers may provide all figures in the range mode, the width of which may be set by the regulator, Abasheva added.

    In addition to the range, the forecast horizon is important. The Central Bank knows of cases where the issuer in advertising brochures indicated potential growth of 40%, 100% – but it is unclear on what time horizon. Therefore, the Bank of Russia proposes to make the forecast horizon mandatory for at least one year, but issuers can choose a longer period.

    At the same time, responsibility for forecasts does not go away, Abasheeva emphasizes. “If you include deliberately false information in the prospectus, intentionally mislead investors, then you must be aware of your responsibility for this,” she explained. Analytical reports from professionals

    According to Ekaterina Abasheeva, this point caused some concerns among market participants. The main argument against independent assessment was that there are not enough analysts on the market now who can cover the IPO market, she says. However, from the regulator’s point of view, it is a question of chicken and egg: if there is demand for analytical reports, there will be analysts.

    Market participants also see a possible conflict of interest among analysts, when issuers will choose those who are guaranteed to “draw” them beautiful reports. To this, Abasheeva responded that the Bank of Russia has well-established mechanisms for working with the known problem: “A conflict of interest is a topic that is clear how to work with, because otherwise we would not have audit services or ratings for the same bonds. We do not see any problems here,” she notes.

    According to her, independence can be defined as the absence of other commercial interests of the person providing analytical services. Currently, the organizers of placements simultaneously evaluate the issuer and offer its shares to their clients when providing brokerage services, and acquire them for their portfolio.

    Allocation disclosure requirement may become mandatory

    In May 2024, the Central Bank tried to “spur” issuers and placement organizers to be open by sending an information letter. In the document, the regulator proposed that companies disclose their approaches to distributing shares among different categories of investors before the IPO, and then publish information on the actual distribution of shares among buyers.

    However, the information letter was advisory in nature and not all issuers heeded it. Currently, the Bank of Russia is considering the possibility of transferring the recommendations to the mandatory level, noted Abasheeva.

    “We are now proposing to make it mandatory to disclose information about both the proposed allocation and the actual distribution of shares,” said Abasheeva.

    It is planned that the Bank of Russia will present the results of the discussion of the report in the summer of this year and will determine the standards that will become mandatory for IPO candidates.

    Gleb Kukharchuk, Dmitry Polyansky, “RBC Investments”

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    HTTPS: //VVV.KBR.ru/Press/Event/? ID = 23488

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI: Zero Hash Secures Approval to Establish a Trust Company, Strengthening Its Custody Capabilities

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ASHEVILLE, N.C., March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Zero Hash, the leading crypto and stablecoin infrastructure platform, has been granted approval to establish a Trust Company in North Carolina, further reinforcing its position as the most comprehensive digital asset provider. This milestone deepens Zero Hash’s regulatory stack, unlocking new opportunities for institutional and brokerage clients.

    With the addition of a chartered Trust Company, Zero Hash expands its regulatory footprint, ensuring the broadest regulatory coverage for crypto and stablecoin infrastructure. Specifically, the Trust:

    • Aligns with the company’s commitment to compliance-forward innovation as the industry prepares for upcoming legislation, including the GENIUS Act, which are expected to add specific regulatory requirements for stablecoin custodians.
    • Enables Zero Hash to enhance its service offerings. As a Qualified Custodian, the company can now custody tokenized assets on behalf of SEC-registered institutions, further broadening its appeal to enterprise clients.
    • Allows Zero Hash to introduce new account types for brokerage customers, including retirement accounts and registered investment advisors.

    “This approval is a testament to our unwavering commitment to being the most comprehensive and trusted partner in the crypto and stablecoin space,” said Stephen Gardner, CEO of Zero Hash Trust. “We are excited to continue to expand our offering for the partners we service including the leading payment groups such as Shift4 and Stripe and brokerage partners including Interactive Brokers and tastytrade.”

    Concurrently, Zero Hash is announcing the appointment of two public board members appointed to the Trust. Mary Ruppert has over 20 years of experience as an attorney, compliance officer, and public policy professional, including at PayPal and the Department of Justice. David Hannigan is currently the CISO at NuBank, having previously led security at Spotify and Capital One.

    About Zero Hash

    Zero Hash is the leading crypto and stablecoin infrastructure provider that seamlessly connects fiat, crypto, and stablecoins in one platform, enabling a better way to move and transfer money and value globally.

    Through its embeddable infrastructure, start-ups, enterprises, and Fortune 500 companies build a diverse range of use cases, including cross-border payments, commerce, trading, remittance, payroll, tokenization, wallets, and on/off-ramps.

    Zero Hash Holdings is backed by investors, including Point72 Ventures, Bain Capital Ventures, and NYCA.

    Zero Hash Trust Company LLC will be established in North Carolina and hold a non-depository trust charter issued by the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks.

    Zero Hash LLC is a FinCen-registered Money Service Business and a regulated Money Transmitter that can operate in 51 U.S. jurisdictions. Zero Hash LLC and Zero Hash Liquidity Services LLC are licensed to engage in virtual currency business activity by the New York State Department of Financial Services. In Canada, Zero Hash LLC is registered as a Money Service Business with FINTRAC.

    Zero Hash Australia Pty Ltd. is registered with AUSTRAC as a Digital Currency Exchange Provider, with DCE registered provider number DCE100804170-001. Zero Hash Australia Pty Ltd. is registered on the New Zealand register of financial service providers, with Financial Service Provider (FSP) number FSP1004503. Zero Hash Europe B.V. is registered as a Virtual Asset Services Provider (VASP) by the Dutch Central Bank (Relation number: R193684). Zero Hash Europe Sp. Zoo is registered as a VASP by the Tax Administration Chamber of Poland in Katowice (Registration number RDWW – 1212).

    Media Contacts

    Zero Hash

    Shaun O’Keeffe

    (855) 744-7333

    media@zerohash.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: First American Bank Celebrates American Exchanger Services’ SBA Wisconsin 2025 Small Business Exporter of the Year Award

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MILWAUKEE, March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — First American Bank proudly congratulates American Exchanger Services for being named the Small Business Administration (SBA) Wisconsin 2025 Small Business Exporter of the Year. This prestigious award recognizes the company’s impressive international growth and resilience in overcoming global challenges, proving that strategic financial support can lead to extraordinary success.

    The journey of American Exchanger Services is a remarkable tale of recovery. In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the company faced severe disruptions to their contracts and struggled with strained finances and mounting debt. Rather than surrender, they reached out to First American Bank in 2023, seeking the support needed to turn things around.

    In response, First American Bank provided a tailored financial solution. Recognizing the potential for recovery through their returning foreign contracts, the bank offered an SBA Export Express Line of Credit to address immediate working capital needs. Additionally, First American Bank consolidated the company’s debt and refinanced real estate through the SBA International Trade Loan (ITL), stabilizing cash flow and setting the stage for profitability.

    “The strength of any business lies not just in its ability to survive, but in its ability to rebound, adapt, and grow in the face of adversity,” said Randy Sherwood, First Vice President, Commercial Banking at First American Bank. “American Exchanger Services’ recovery is a testament to their tenacity and the power of having the right financial partner at the right moment. We’re proud to have played a pivotal role in their journey and look forward to their continued success as they expand globally.”

    Today, American Exchanger Services has not only recovered but is thriving. The company’s operations have expanded, their footprint in international markets has grown, and their ability to meet customer demand has soared. Their success story underscores the importance of strategic financial solutions, especially for businesses navigating the complexities of global trade.

    “At First American Bank, we view our role as not just a lender, but a partner in our clients’ success stories,” said James Matteson, First Vice President, SBA Program Manager at First American Bank. “American Exchanger Services’ achievement highlights the critical role of tailored financial solutions and the resilience of businesses that innovate in challenging times. We’re excited for what the future holds as they continue to break barriers in international trade.”

    First American Bank is honored to have played a key role in helping American Exchanger Services recover, rebuild, and thrive. This SBA recognition is a powerful reminder of how strategic financing can transform challenges into growth opportunities, fueling continued success in even the most difficult times.

    Additionally, First American Bank is proud to have been recognized as the SBA Export Lender of the Year for Wisconsin, further affirming the bank’s commitment to supporting local businesses in their global expansion efforts.

    At First American Bank, we are dedicated to helping small businesses grow both locally and internationally. American Exchanger Services is just one example of the immense potential small businesses have when given the right tools, resources, and support. We look forward to their continued expansion and are excited to continue partnering with them as they reach new heights.

    Here’s to American Exchanger Services’ ongoing success and growth in the global marketplace.

    For more information about First American Bank and how we help businesses unlock their potential, visit www.firstambank.com.

    First American Bank is a Member FDIC.

    Contact:
    Teresa Lee
    305-631-6400

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Former BlackRock Executive Walter Ward III Rejoins TiiCKER as CEO to Accelerate Growth at Retail Shareholder Engagement Startup

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    GRAND RAPIDS, Mich., March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — TiiCKER, the world’s leading platform for connecting publicly traded companies with their retail investors, today announced the appointment of Walter Ward III as its new Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder. A longtime board member and advisor to TiiCKER and the former Chief of Staff as TiiCKER launched, Ward brings proven leadership experience in fintech, Wall Street, and corporate innovation—most recently serving as Chief Operating Officer for BlackRock’s Atlanta Innovation Hub and Chief Operating Officer for ETF Platform Innovation and Change.

    At BlackRock ($BLK), Ward played a pivotal role in managing the business operations and for one of the firms largest ETF platform transformations while also leading the Atlanta Innovation Hub as COO, where he spearheaded new initiatives in fintech and asset management. Prior to BlackRock, Ward served as Director and Chief of Staff for Liquidity Solutions at Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), where he helped drive growth for one of the fastest-expanding divisions at the bank focused on serving the innovation economy.

    “Walter has been instrumental in shaping TiiCKER from its inception, and this is a full-circle moment for our team and our investors to have him back at the helm,” said Jeff Lambert, Chairman and Founder of TiiCKER. “His experience in financial services, technology, and consumer engagement, coupled with his intimate knowledge of our tech stack, business model and retail investor audience, ensures TiiCKER and the companies and brands we serve will feel his impact on day one.”

    Ward’s appointment marks a pivotal moment for TiiCKER as it sharpens its focus on the most widely held retail stocks, scaling its community of everyday investors and the companies eager to engage them through exclusive perks and rewards.

    “I couldn’t be more excited to step into the CEO role at TiiCKER,” said Ward. “This isn’t just another company to me—it’s a movement. TiiCKER is pioneering the future of shareholder engagement, and we’re only scratching the surface. From product innovation to business development, we’re building something epic, and I want to bring the best minds along for the journey.”

    Under Ward’s leadership, TiiCKER is actively looking to connect with professionals and partners in key areas, including product development, business development, retail investor marketing, and corporate partnerships.

    TiiCKER continues to redefine the relationship between public companies and their retail investors by offering a seamless platform where shareholders can verify their ownership, access exclusive perks, and engage with the companies they own. With Ward at the helm, the company is poised for its next phase of growth, expanding its reach among retail investors and publicly traded brands, supporting IPOs and registered offerings, and further solidifying its position as the premier platform for retail shareholder engagement.

    For more information, visit www.TiiCKER.com.

    About TiiCKER
    Fintech TiiCKER invented verified stock perks and direct-to-shareholder marketing through its web-based and mobile app software platforms, providing consumers and investors with a revolutionary way to engage with the brands they own and love. For America’s more than 100 million retail investors and fans of publicly traded brands, TiiCKER provides unique access to shareholder perks and discounts, custom articles and content, CEO and company-access events for retail investors, and TiiCKER Perks from marketing partners.

    For its brands and public company partners, TiiCKER creates and markets measurable Shareholder Loyalty Programs that drive more spending, investing and voting among their consumers and verified owners, maximizing Shareholder Lifetime Value™. As a result of its innovation and leadership in direct-to-shareholder marketing, TiiCKER was named: Best Shareholder Engagement Platform (2024 Benzinga Global Fintech Awards); Most Innovative Tech Companies of the Year at the 2024 American Business Awards®; Top MarTech Startup of 2023 by MarTech Outlook; and won the 2023 cohort for the AWS (Amazon Web Services) Fintech Accelerator program.

    Media Contact:
    Sarah Smith
    ssmith@tiicker.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Participation of Standalone Primary Dealers in Variable Rate Repo operations

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    In terms of the paragraph 1(x) of the Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated February 06, 2020, Standalone Primary Dealers (SPDs) were allowed to participate in all overnight liquidity management operations (except Marginal Standing Facility) under the current Liquidity Management Framework dated February 06, 2020. SPDs were also allowed to participate in other operations such as long-term Variable Rate Repo (VRR) operations and daily VRRs on a case-to-case basis.

    2. On a review, it has now been decided to allow SPDs to participate in all Repo operations, irrespective of the tenor, conducted by the Reserve Bank.

    (Puneet Pancholy)  
    Chief General Manager

    Press Release: 2024-2025/2470

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Directions under Section 35A read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 – Shree Mahalaxmi Urban Co-operative Credit Bank Ltd., Gokak (Karnataka) – Extension of Period

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    The Reserve Bank of India issued Directions under Section 35A read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 to Shree Mahalaxmi Urban Co-operative Credit Bank Ltd., Gokak vide Directive No. CO.DOS.SED.No.S4800/12-23-151/2024-2025 dated September 26, 2024, for a period of six months up to close of business on March 27, 2025. The Reserve Bank of India is satisfied that in the public interest, it is necessary to further extend the period of operation of the Directive beyond close of business on March 27, 2025.

    2. Accordingly, the Reserve Bank of India, in exercise of the powers vested in it under sub-section (1) of Section 35A read with Section 56 of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, hereby extends the Directive for a further period of three months from close of business on March 27, 2025, to close of business on June 27, 2025, subject to review.

    3. All other terms and conditions of the Directive under reference shall remain unchanged.

    (Puneet Pancholy)  
    Chief General Manager

    Press Release: 2024-2025/2471

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Economics: RBI imposes monetary penalty on Punjab & Sind Bank

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has, by an order dated March 24, 2025, imposed a monetary penalty of ₹68.20 lakh (Rupees Sixty Eight Lakh Twenty Thousand only) on Punjab & Sind Bank (the bank) for non-compliance with certain directions issued by RBI on ‘Creation of a Central Repository of Large Common Exposures – Across Banks’ read with ‘Central Repository of lnformation on Large Credits (CRlLC) – Revision in Reporting’ and ‘Financial Inclusion – Access to Banking Services – Basic Savings Bank Deposit Account (BSBDA)’. This penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers conferred on RBI under the provisions of Section 47A(1)(c) read with Sections 46(4)(i) and 51(1) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

    The Statutory Inspection for Supervisory Evaluation (ISE 2023) of the bank was conducted by RBI with reference to its financial position as on March 31, 2023. Based on supervisory findings of non-compliance with RBI directions and related correspondence in that regard, a notice was issued to the bank advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for its failure to comply with the said directions.

    After considering the bank’s reply to the notice, additional submissions made by it and oral submissions made during the personal hearing, RBI found that the following charges against the bank were sustained, warranting imposition of monetary penalty:

    1. The bank did not report certain borrowers with non-fund based exposure of ₹5 crore and above to CRILC; and

    2. The bank allowed certain BSBDA holders to open Savings Bank Deposit Accounts.

    The action is based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the bank with its customers. Further, imposition of monetary penalty is without prejudice to any other action that may be initiated by RBI against the bank.

    (Puneet Pancholy)  
    Chief General Manager

    Press Release: 2024-2025/2469

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Banking: Secretary-General of ASEAN welcomes Minister of Europe and Foreign Affairs of France to the ASEAN Headquarters/ASEAN Secretariat

    Source: ASEAN

    Secretary-General of ASEAN, Dr. Kao Kim Hourn, today welcomed H.E. Jean-Noël Barrot, Minister of Europe and Foreign Affairs of the Republic of France, at the ASEAN Headquarters/ASEAN Secretariat. Their discussion revolved around seeking ways and means to further enhance ASEAN-France relations as both sides mark the fifth anniversary of their Development Partnership this year.

    The post Secretary-General of ASEAN welcomes Minister of Europe and Foreign Affairs of France to the ASEAN Headquarters/ASEAN Secretariat appeared first on ASEAN Main Portal.

    MIL OSI Global Banks

  • MIL-OSI Economics: RBI imposes monetary penalty on KLM Axiva Finvest Limited

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has, by an order dated March 24, 2025, imposed a monetary penalty of ₹10 lakh (Rupees Ten Lakh only) on KLM Axiva Finvest Limited (the company) for non-compliance with requirements relating to ‘Declaration of dividends’ contained in the RBI directions on ‘Reserve Bank of India (Non-Banking Financial Company – Scale Based Regulation) Directions, 2023’. This penalty has been imposed in exercise of powers conferred on RBI under the provisions of clause (b) of sub-section (1) of Section 58G read with clause (aa) of sub-section (5) of Section 58B of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.

    The correspondence pertaining to the intimation of declaration of an interim dividend revealed, inter alia, non-compliance with RBI directions. Based on the same, a notice was issued to the company advising it to show cause as to why penalty should not be imposed on it for its failure to comply with the said directions.

    After considering the company’s reply to the notice and oral submissions made during the personal hearing, RBI found that the following charge against the company was sustained, warranting imposition of monetary penalty.

    The company declared a dividend for the financial year 2023-24, despite not meeting the minimum prudential requirements in each of the last three financial years.

    This action is based on deficiencies in regulatory compliance and is not intended to pronounce upon the validity of any transaction or agreement entered into by the company with its customers. Further, imposition of this monetary penalty is without prejudice to any other action that may be initiated by RBI against the company.

    (Puneet Pancholy)  
    Chief General Manager

    Press Release: 2024-2025/2467

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Address to the National Press Club, Canberra

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Here we are, back again on Ngunnawal land, gathering at the kind invitation of Maurice and the Board, sponsors and members of the National Press Club.

    But since last time, not just one new President but 2: Trump; and Connell.

    Congratulations Tom on your election, and thanks for your introduction –

    And to everyone here, including the pundits and, on recent form, maybe a couple of protesters again too.

    Last night marked the first time since Ben Chifley was PM and Treasurer, more than 3 quarters of a century ago, that there’ve been 4 budgets in a single term.

    And of the 11 times I’ve spoken here, I think it’s the 4 post‑Budget opportunities I’ve cherished the most.

    Partly because Laura Chalmers comes along, and is here again, she brought Leo last night, and that means a lot to me.

    And also, because they offer us the chance to go behind the Budget a bit, to provide some more of the colour and context.

    Today I want to talk about how our economy is turning a corner, even as global conditions take a turn for the worse.

    Explain how seismic changes in the world validate and vindicate our strategy, rather than undermine it.

    And lay out our government’s economic case for re‑election –

    Based on our progress to here, our plans from here, and the risks posed by our opponents.

    The fourth shock

    First let me sketch the backdrop.

    Twenty years ago, I fronted up for my first of 19 Budget lockups.

    Costello was Treasurer, and the global economy was a very different place.

    In the 2 decades since, half a dozen subsequent Treasurers presided over 3 big economic shocks.

    The first, a financial crisis that became a demand shock.

    The second, a pandemic that became a supply shock.

    The third, an inflationary shock that lingers around the world longer than anyone hoped.

    Escalating trade tensions now risk, if not represent, the fourth big economic shock in just 17 years.

    Now, if you think about the big post‑war global economic story.

    From Bretton Woods in 1945, to the high inflation of the 70s.

    The Washington Consensus that held from the end of the Cold War until the start of the GFC.

    There’s a tendency to talk about economic shocks as punctuation. A break in the flow.

    But the last 20 years prove that global shocks – in one form or another – are chapters in their own right.

    They no longer interrupt the story – they are the story.

    Acknowledgements

    Governing a country like ours in uncertain times like these is a responsibility we accept and an opportunity we cherish.

    Led by the Prime Minister – who is here today.

    His collaborative style of leadership is appreciated by all of us in his team.

    Katy and I told the Cabinet yesterday that we consider ourselves very fortunate to have been so well‑supported by so many ministers, a number of them here today and I thank and acknowledge them again.

    And no Treasurer has ever been more fortunate than me when it comes to the Finance Minister.

    The best colleague I’ve ever had.

    Nothing we’ve done over the course of 4 Budgets would be possible without her calm and composure, her empathy and judgement.

    Katy came to the Treasury thank you dinner on Thursday night.

    I’m told that’s unprecedented – but for us it’s not unusual.

    I’m sure Katy would agree it’s not the most glamorous ritual.

    The pile of pide boxes and a sea of tired eyes sums up the week, and weeks, before.

    But it gives us a chance to say thanks to Steven, Jenny, Glyn and all the officials involved in putting this Budget together.

    That evening, I was reflecting with officials on the time I spent as a public servant, working for Glyn in Queensland.

    He was the first to tell me what it looked like inside the Cabinet Room here in Parliament House.

    Right down to the framed paintings of Australian lorikeets on the walls.

    Those birds have seen and heard a lot!

    I’m told I’ve spent 664 hours in that room this term – which is about 27 days.

    Whenever I’m in there, I try to remember that’s it’s not the birds in the frame or the galahs in the pet shop that really matter.

    We try to ensure those conversations around the cabinet table are shaped by the conversations Australians are having around the kitchen table.

    We know cost of living is front of mind for most Australians and that’s why it’s been front and centre in all 4 budgets.

    No matter how difficult or long the deliberations might be in that room I’m always aware how lucky we are to be in there.

    Treasurers stand there on Budget night on behalf of all who do so much to put our plans into Budgets, and into action.

    ERC ministers who undertake the essential deliberations – 233 of those 664 cabinet room hours were with them.

    Every member of our caucus who all do so much to advocate for the people they represent.

    The staff from our offices and all the public servants.

    Please join me in thanking them.

    Turning a corner

    This Budget makes it clear that the Australian economy is emerging from a global cost‑of‑living crisis in better shape than anywhere else.

    Inflation is down, living standards are rising, real incomes are growing, unemployment is low, interest rates are coming down, debt is down and now growth is gathering pace.

    That combination is exceptional – and not accidental.

    It is the product of the choices we have made.

    Delivering cost‑of‑living relief for every Australian.

    Strengthening Medicare and the services people count on.

    And building a Future Made in Australia.

    The 2 weeks leading into the Budget made clear just how important and urgent this work has been.

    The human and economic costs of Tropical Cyclone Alfred.

    Coming so soon after widespread flooding in north and far north Queensland – with more damaging heavy rains there just last week.

    And now, fresh turmoil in the world – part of this fourth shock.

    All of this vindicates the course we chose 3 years ago.

    And validates the choices we made together.

    Economic case for re‑election

    This is where I want to pay tribute to the Prime Minister.

    The leader Australians see standing with emergency services in disasters brings the same decency to every challenge confronting our nation.

    Anthony’s leadership is defined by his compassion, his optimism – and his determination.

    And he will make our case for re‑election to the Australian people with those same qualities and commitment.

    This election will be about the strong foundations we have laid, the better future we are building – and the risk of our opponents wrecking it all.

    It will be a referendum on Medicare.

    A simple choice between Labor cutting taxes and helping with the cost of living –

    And Peter Dutton’s secret cuts which will make Australians worse off.

    Because he wants to cut everything except income taxes for workers.

    Above all else it will be an election about the economy.

    Labor’s economic case for a second term has 3 parts:

    The progress we have made together in the economy and repairing the budget.

    The work we are doing and the economic plan we are implementing – to boost wages, rebuild living standards, and make our economy more resilient, more competitive and more productive.

    And the deliberate threat and significant danger that the Coalition pose if they form the next government.

    Reason one: progress

    The economic progress documented in the Budget last night belongs to every Australian.

    It’s all the more remarkable against a backdrop of extreme global uncertainty.

    To give you a sense of that, take inflation.

    In the most recent quarterly data, inflation sits at 2.4 per cent – and just now, today’s monthly reading came in the same.

    On election night, in May of 2022, inflation was more than double that and rising.

    So when I stood here after our first Budget in October that year, inflation was nearly triple what it is today.

    In that first Budget, we were talking about how far we had to go together.

    Today, we can point to how far we’ve come.

    We have brought inflation down while encouraging a broader recovery in our economy, now well underway.

    Our fiscal policy helped break the back of inflation when it was at its peak.

    It adjusted to support growth and preserve employment, as inflation came down.

    And we’ve delivered responsible cost‑of‑living relief that has directly taken the pressure off prices.

    Because of this a soft landing is coming into view –

    With growth rebounding, living standards recovering, and the private sector playing a larger role.

    The last financial year saw the highest level of business investment in over a decade.

    Four in every 5 of the million jobs created have been in the private sector.

    25,000 new businesses created each month this term – the highest average on record.

    Real wages and living standards rising again.

    While the gender pay gap is at near record lows and unemployment is at around 4 per cent.

    Treasury expects employment growth this year will be stronger, inflation will come down faster, and participation will stay near its record high for longer compared with the mid‑year update.

    So, our economy isn’t just growing faster, it’s growing in a way which will be stronger, more sustainable and more inclusive too.

    All this, while successfully steering towards a stunning improvement in our fiscal position.

    We inherited a mess and we’re cleaning it up.

    The budget bottom line is $207 billion better off on our watch.

    This is the biggest ever nominal improvement in a single term.

    Turning $135 billion of Liberal deficits into surpluses worth $38 billion – the first back‑to‑back surpluses in 2 decades.

    Almost halving the deficit we inherited for this financial year.

    And improving the budget position every year of the forward estimates, compared to PEFO.

    All this is a deliberate result of our responsibility and restraint.

    Banking the vast majority of revenue upgrades – around 7 of every 10 dollars.

    Restraining spending growth to 1.7 per cent – less than half the average under our predecessors.

    Finding almost $95 billion of savings – more this term than they managed over their last 2 combined, with precisely zero in their last Budget.

    Making real structural reform to secure the future of aged care and the National Disability Insurance Scheme.

    Guaranteeing the choice, dignity and security they bring to millions of Australians.

    And tackling high and rising interest costs.

    Just after coming to government, they were forecast to grow by 14.4 per cent per year.

    After 3 years of responsibility and restraint we’ve managed to cut that to 9.5 per cent.

    A big part of this story is our decision to return the vast majority of revenue upgrades to the bottom line.

    Not only has this improved the budget position by around $250 billion dollars to 2028–29.

    It means we will save about $112 billion in interest payments over the medium term.

    Reason 2: plans

    We don’t see the substantial progress we’ve made on the budget as an end in itself.

    Repairing the budget and rebuilding living standards go hand in hand.

    Our responsible approach has made room for the 5 main priorities of this Budget.

    Helping with the cost of living.

    Strengthening Medicare.

    Building more homes.

    Investing in every stage of education.

    And making our economy stronger, more productive, and more resilient.

    These are essential components of our economic plan.

    To strengthen our resilience in uncertain times.

    To create a more dynamic, competitive economy.

    And to rebuild incomes and living standards.

    Rebuilding living standards

    In this Budget we’re delivering more cost‑of‑living relief for Australians when it’s needed.

    Extending energy bill relief.

    Funding wage increases for care workers.

    Making medicines cheaper.

    Relieving student debt.

    And lowering taxes for every taxpayer.

    The combined benefit for an average household will be more than $15,000 from our 3 rounds of tax cuts and energy bill relief alone.

    Substantial relief while also building the earning capacity of Australians for the future too.

    By improving access to education – so that every Australian gets the chance to work in the jobs of the future.

    By investing in Medicare and expanding bulk billing – minimising out of pocket health costs and time out of work.

    And by moving towards universal early childhood education – so that parents can work more, if they want to.

    These parts of our plan to rebuild living standards are distinct but interlinked.

    Take our tax cut top‑up – a modest but meaningful addition to the tax cuts we’re rolling out already.

    The average annual tax cut, after this year’s and next year’s, is $2,548 or about $50 a week.

    Our tax cuts will:

    Boost incomes by 1.9 per cent within 2 years.

    Support the private sector recovery.

    Increase participation by more than 1.3 million hours –

    With Treasury estimating that 900,000 of these hours will be taken up by women.

    And give people a better start in their careers with the average young worker receiving a tax cut more than twice the size they would have under the Coalition.

    So, our tax cuts provide immediate relief while also boosting participation, aspiration, and Australians’ long‑term earning potential too.

    Resilience

    This focus on improving living standards is a big part of this Budget because it’s the fundamental mission of our government.

    Creating opportunities, and helping people seize them in a world full of churn and change.

    We cannot undo or ignore the shift from globalisation to fragmentation.

    We can determine how we respond.

    That’s what a Future Made in Australia is about.

    It’s a pro‑trade agenda, that puts a premium on private sector investment.

    It rejects self‑sabotaging tariffs and trade barriers, protectionism and isolationism.

    It focuses on how we shore up critical supply chains and become indispensable to new ones.

    This is critical to the jobs of the future.

    And it’s vital to managing uncertainty now.

    $30 billion of projects in sectors like green hydrogen, critical minerals and clean energy manufacturing have been proposed or are in development.

    Our plan is to build on this progress – improving our resilience by unlocking our competitiveness.

    In this Budget we’re facilitating more private investment in renewable energy – our fundamental comparative advantage in the new net zero economy.

    We’re funding research in clean energy technology manufacturing and low carbon liquid fuels – so we can commercialise Australian innovations.

    And we’re making big investments in green metals – leveraging our traditional strength in resources to build new opportunities.

    Reform

    A Future Made in Australia, powered by cleaner and cheaper energy, positions us as an essential part of the global net zero economy.

    This will be critical to our growth prospects.

    But it’s not the only part of our growth agenda.

    We know the foundations of future success start with more competitiveness, and a more productive economy.

    That’s why we’re reforming the payments system, our financial market infrastructure, approvals processes, our foreign investment framework and more.

    It might be unusual to keep the wheels of economic reform turning in a pre‑election Budget, but that’s what we’re doing.

    First, by banning non‑compete clauses for most workers.

    And second, by creating a national licensing scheme for electrical occupations.

    We’re proud of these changes because they show that the way to increase competition and productivity in our economy isn’t with scorched‑earth industrial relations –

    Or making Australians work longer for less.

    It’s with policy that boosts competition, while boosting wages and our workforce at the same time.

    This is a Budget that’s pro‑worker, pro‑growth and pro‑competition.

    Our reform to non‑competes will remove a handbrake on competition and a speedbump to aspiration.

    Most workers will no longer need a lawyer to get a better paying job.

    They won’t need permission from their old boss to become their own boss.

    Instead, we’re empowering them to move jobs and earn more and start businesses if they want to.

    This could add an estimated $5 billion annually to our economy.

    At the same time as average wages for those freed from these restrictions could increase by up to $2,500 a year.

    We’re also boosting competition and backing workers with a new occupational licensing regime for electricians.

    Requiring electricians to get a new license every time they want to work inter‑state is unnecessary, costly red tape.

    We’re making sure a sparky on the Tweed doesn’t need a different licence for a job in Coolangatta.

    Broader licensing reform could lift GDP by up to $10 billion a year.

    Which is why this change will be a template for future reform.

    Reason 3: risk

    Our progress to here, and our plan for what’s ahead, make up 2 parts of our economic case for re‑election.

    The third is the risk that all this could be undone by a Coalition government.

    Usually at this point in Budget week or the electoral cycle, you would set some basic tests for your opponent.

    On this occasion they’ve already failed them.

    The Coalition has put forward the ‘weakest policy offering from an opposition in living memory’, according to industry sources.

    They either don’t have a clue or they won’t come clean.

    But what looks like slapstick comedy masks more sinister intent.

    We know this because Angus Taylor has told us, and the Coalition’s position on key issues has shown us.

    Now, Angus and I don’t agree on much.

    But to give credit where it’s due, he made one insightful point recently when he said ‘the best predictor of future performance is past performance’.

    And – in a dramatic break from usual Coalition internals – Peter Dutton backed him in.

    On this, they are absolutely right.

    Their past performance is no surpluses, more waste and rorts, and more debt.

    Their past performance is middle Australia missing out – with real wages in reverse and living standards falling fast.

    Their past performance is much higher and rising inflation.

    Their past performance is Peter Dutton’s attacks on Medicare.

    But it is not just their record in government that reveals their priorities and what they would do if elected.

    Their recent record in Opposition makes it very clear:

    Australians would be worse off under Peter Dutton.

    When he cuts, Australians will pay.

    Cutting cost‑of‑living help is the only motivation that binds this Coalition clown show together.

    They’ve opposed cuts to student debt and energy bill relief.

    Opposed cheaper childcare and cheaper medicines.

    Opposed more homes and more Urgent Care Clinics.

    Today they voted for higher taxes on Australian workers.

    Australians would be much worse off if Peter Dutton had his way and they’ll be worse off still if he wins.

    This brain snap from Angus Taylor on tax makes that crystal clear.

    It means this parliamentary term finishes like it started:

    Labor helping Australians with the cost of living and Peter Dutton and the Coalition trying to prevent it.

    The Liberals and Nationals have now opposed 3 tax cuts, 3 times in 3 years.

    Instead of working with us to help Australians, they’ve got secret plans to harm them.

    It beggars belief that Peter Dutton says he will make hundreds of billions in cuts, but won’t tell Australians where or how.

    There’s only one reason for that – and people should know about it.

    The Coalition can’t find the $600 billion they need for nuclear, or the billions in cuts they’ve promised, without coming after Medicare again.

    The point I’m making is this.

    When the Australian economy is turning a corner.

    And the global economy is taking a turn for the worse.

    We can’t afford to turn back.

    Not when so little is known about the alternative.

    Conclusion

    I know this tradition is as much about your questions as it is about the Treasurer’s address.

    So let me just share some final thoughts.

    There are familiar rituals and rhythms to Budget week.

    Even after 20 years, you can still get caught up in them.

    But a budget is never about one week, or 5.

    It’s overwhelmingly a program for the years ahead.

    Ours also makes the economic case for re‑election.

    More than that, it spells out our plan for action to build on the progress we’ve made together.

    Now, it’s probably fair to say that over the years and out in the suburbs there’s been a flattening of expectations of what we can achieve through economic policymaking.

    And a narrowing of our collective sense that political leadership can make a real and tangible difference in people’s lives.

    Every one of us has reason to reflect on our role, but also, on whether we can turn it around.

    Because Australians should be proud of all that we have achieved together.

    We are on the cusp of something extraordinary in our economy.

    But something prevents us from saying so.

    Maybe that’s because of Australians’ natural streak of humility.

    Maybe after years of crisis, we’ve trained ourselves to brace for the next one.

    Maybe it’s the erosion of trust in institutions that we see around the world.

    Something that Australia has so far managed to avoid the most extreme fallout from.

    But a big part of it is undoubtedly due to the pressure people are under.

    We get that.

    Because, while we have every reason to be optimistic about the future, we understand that this can often run ahead of
    how people are faring and feeling.

    For many Australians, the pressures of the past few years have been substantial.

    So let me say we don’t just acknowledge that – we’re doing something about it.

    You saw that again in the Budget last night.

    Yes, inflation is coming down, real wages are up, unemployment is low, interest rates have started coming down, the economy is bouncing back.

    But for many people, the gap between working hard and getting ahead still needs eliminating.

    That’s why there’s more work to do.

    It’s why our focus isn’t confined to the national numbers – as important as they are.

    This Budget is about more than turning the corner, it’s a plan for where we go next.

    Not just putting the worst behind us –

    But seizing what’s in front of us.

    In this new world of uncertainty –

    Creating a new generation of prosperity –

    That is stronger, because it is more inclusive –

    In the better future that we’re building together.

    Thanks very much.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI: Madis Toomsalu expresses will to resign as CEO of LHV Group

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Madis Toomsalu, the Chairman of the Management Board of AS LHV Group, has informed the company’s Nomination Commitee and the Supervisory Board of his will to resign by the fall of this year. Preparations are underway to find a new Chairman of the Board for the financial group.

    Mr Toomsalu has worked in LHV since 2007 when he arrived as an intern. He became the first credit analyst in LHV Pank and afterwards led the field as Head of Credits and Chairman of the Credit Committee. Since 2016 he has held the position of Chairman of the Management Board of LHV Group. Additionally he is the Chairman of the Supervisory Boards of AS LHV Pank, AS LHV Kindlustus, AS LHV Varahaldus and the Chairman of the Board of Directors of LHV Bank Ltd. 

    Under his leadership LHV’s loan portfolio has increased tenfold, reaching nearly EUR 5 billion today. In addition to the rapid growth of LHV Pank in Estonia, LHV Bank, operating in England, and LHV Kindlustus, providing insurance services, have been established during this time. LHV has remained the best bank in Estonia, the most attractive employer, and the company with the best investor relations.

    The LHV’s Nomination Committee has started the process of finding a new CEO. The roles of the group and its CEO need to be re-mapped, taking into account future challenges. A suitable candidate must be approved by the LHV Group’s Supervisory Board and also by the financial supervision authorities.

    “A big thank you to Madis for his invaluable contribution to the development of LHV over the past 18 years. These have been remarkable and successful years. Madis’s impact is firmly embedded in today’s LHV. We wish him all the best and much success in his new challenges, whatever they may be,” Rain Lõhmus, the Chairman of the Supervisory Board of LHV Group commented.

    “LHV is a living organism that needs more creativity and inspiration than orders and restrictions. It’s thanks to this approach that we’ve been able to achieve strong results. At the same time, the role of the CEO of LHV Group has changed. Back in 2016, when I started, it was important to understand which regulations needed to be considered when running a banking business. Today, the question is what kind of business can even be done in the context of existing regulations. I believe this role should therefore be redefined, with a new focus on the upcoming technological revolution. Adding to that a previously made personal family commitment, it makes sense to conclude my work and continue observing LHV’s rapid development from the position of a shareholder,” Madis Toomsalu commented.

    LHV Group is the largest domestic financial group and capital provider in Estonia. The main subsidiaries of LHV Group are LHV Pank, LHV Varahaldus, LHV Kindlustus, and LHV Bank Limited. The Group employs more than 1,160 people. As at the end of February, the banking services of LHV are used by 462,000 clients, the pension funds managed by LHV have 113,000 active clients, and LHV Kindlustus protects a total of 174,000 clients. LHV Bank, a subsidiary of the Group, holds a UK banking licence and offers banking services to international fintech companies and loans to small and medium-sized enterprises.

    Priit Rum
    Communications Manager
    Phone: +372 502 0786
    Email: priit.rum@lhv.ee 

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI USA: Disaster Recovery Center Opening in Lee County

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Disaster Recovery Center Opening in Lee County

    Disaster Recovery Center Opening in Lee County

    FRANKFORT, Ky

    –A Disaster Recovery Center is opening March 24 in Lee County to offer in-person support to Kentucky survivors who experienced loss as the result of Feb

    14 – March 7 severe storms, straight-line winds, flooding, landslides and mudslides

     The new Disaster Recovery Center in Lee County is located at: Happy Top Park Community Center, 500 Happy Top Road, Beattyville, KY 41311Working days and hours are March 24-28, 9 a

    m

    to 7 p

    m

    Eastern TimeFEMA representatives can explain available assistance programs, how to apply to FEMA, and help connect survivors with resources for their recovery needs

    Representatives from the Kentucky Office of Unemployment Insurance, the Kentucky Department of Insurance and the U

    S

    Small Business Administration (SBA) will also be available at the recovery centers to assist survivors

    Additional Disaster Recovery Centers are scheduled to open in other Kentucky counties

    Click here to find centers that are already open in Kentucky

    You can visit any open center to meet with representatives of FEMA, the commonwealth of Kentucky and the U

    S

    Small Business Administration

    No appointment is needed

     To find all other center locations, including those in other states, go to fema

    gov/drc or text “DRC” and a Zip Code to 43362

     FEMA is encouraging Kentuckians affected by the February storms to apply for federal disaster assistance as soon as possible

    The deadline to apply for FEMA assistance is April 25

    Kentucky homeowners and renters in Breathitt, Clay, Estill, Floyd, Harlan, Johnson, Knott, Lee, Leslie, Letcher, Martin, Owsley, Perry, Pike, Simpson and Woodford counties can apply for federal assistance

    If you are unable to visit the center, there are other ways to apply: online at DisasterAssistance

    gov, use the FEMA App for mobile devices or call 800-621-3362

    If you use a relay service, such as Video Relay Service (VRS), captioned telephone or other service, give FEMA the number for that service

    When you apply, you will need to provide:A current phone number where you can be contacted

    Your address at the time of the disaster and the address where you are now staying

    Your Social Security Number

    A general list of damage and losses

    Banking information if you choose direct deposit

    If insured, the policy number or the agent and/or the company name

    For an accessible video on how to apply for FEMA assistance, go to youtube

    com/watch?v=WZGpWI2RCNw

    For more information about Kentucky flooding recovery, visit www

    fema

    gov/disaster/4860

    Follow the FEMA Region 4 X account at x

    com/femaregion4

    martyce

    allenjr
    Tue, 03/25/2025 – 20:08

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: The Academic Council of the State University of Management discussed the development strategy and the future of education

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: State University of Management – Official website of the State –

    On March 25, 2025, the next meeting of the Academic Council of the State University of Management was held.

    Traditionally, we started with the congratulatory part. Rector Vladimir Stroyev presented letters of gratitude from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education for their contribution to the development of practice-oriented education, the development of the federation within the framework of the “Service Learning” program to Vice-Rector Dmitry Bryukhanov and Associate Professor of the Department of Management in International Business and Tourism Industry Svetlana Grishaeva.

    Vladimir Vitalyevich also congratulated the birthday boys of the month and thanked Elena Shtyreva, an employee of the Institute of Distance Education of the State University of Management, for 55 years of continuous work at the State University of Management.

    “I also want to join in the congratulations and say “thank you” on behalf of all the institute’s employees for their daily work and contribution to the development of the institute. I know where she gets this character from, her grandfather was the deputy commander of Vasily Chapaev’s division,” Sergei Lenshin, director of the Fine Arts Department of the State University of Management, congratulated Elena Arkadyevna.

    After the completion of the formal part, those gathered moved on to considering the issues on the agenda.

    Deputy Director of the Department of Academic Policy and Implementation of Educational Programs Olga Zhuravleva presented a summary report on the self-assessment of the main areas of the university’s activities for 2024.

    “For the first time, we worked on the report together with the Center for Prospective Development, which allowed us to better present the overall picture. The indicators have mostly increased and are impressive. The University is successfully developing in most indicators. However, there are also growth points and challenges of modern society that we need to work with more actively,” Olga Zhuravleva noted.

    Director of the Center for Prospective Development Tatyana Gordeeva spoke about the results of the implementation of the State University of Management Development Program for 2024.

    “2024 has become a fundamental year in the formation of the organizational foundations of the development program. At the same time, today we are already working on its implementation in the context of the emerging new system of higher education. What it will be like is still unknown, but we must keep this in mind. In addition, there are risks of reducing off-budget admission to humanitarian programs, which are key for the State University of Management today. Therefore, today it is important to focus on the effective implementation of the development tasks that we have defined for ourselves in order to form the necessary reserve for participation in new national projects and the implementation of our ambitious goals,” Tatyana Gordeeva emphasized.

    Vladimir Stroev noted the importance of not only taking into account indicators in areas, but also making proposals for their improvement, which he expects from every employee.

    “The issue of the development program is not simple, it is connected with many indicators that are used in different systems and different issues. And all our reports must be treated responsibly, not only noting positive results, but also expressing criticism in case of their failure. These data are a reason to think about what we are doing now and what will happen to us tomorrow. It would be good not just to fulfill the indicators, but also to exceed them, or be close to this,” concluded Vladimir Vitalyevich.

    Director of the Institute of Economics and Finance Galina Sorokina reported on the results of the institute’s work for 2024.

    “The institute has shown growth in almost all areas, so it is especially pleasant to make a report. The number of not only admitted students has grown, but also those who transferred from other universities. The number of foreign students has also grown, with Vietnamese students predominating. The number of educational programs implemented by the institute is also growing. A program on behavioral economics is being developed, which will be carried out jointly with the Central Bank and Rosfinmonitoring,” Galina Petrovna noted.

    Vice-Rector Pavel Pavlovsky informed those gathered about the implementation of the Youth Policy Strategy at the State University of Management.

    “The State University of Management is undoubtedly one of the leading universities in the implementation of youth policy. We became the first university in Moscow for educational work, and in Russia we took 3rd place among universities with a population of 5 to 10 thousand people. In 2024, 47 federal projects were held on the basis of the State University of Management. This year, we initiated the All-Russian student competition “Family History. Immortal Memory”, expanded the geography of the All-Russian project “Course for Business and Entrepreneurship” that we are implementing, which will be held not only in the International Children’s Center “Artek” and the All-Russian Children’s Center “Ocean”, but also in the All-Russian Children’s Centers “Smena” and “Orlyonok”. And, of course, the All-Russian KVN School, “University Shifts” and other important events await us,” Pavel Vladimirovich shared.

    Vice-Rector Dmitry Bryukhanov proposed creating a Preparatory Department for Foreign Citizens, which was unanimously supported by the council members.

    At the end of the meeting, Vladimir Stroyev called on those gathered to prepare not only for the 2025 admissions campaign, but also to think about admissions in 2026 and make their proposals.

    “This year, the admission campaign is still under the old system, but next year a new model will be adopted, and we must be ready. It is time to prepare proposals for our areas in a given situation, including in the event of a stressful situation. We must have specific solutions for each issue,” the rector of the State University of Management concluded.

    In addition, the meeting discussed the nomination of GUU employees to participate in the All-Russian competition “Golden Names of Higher Education”, approval of new DPO programs, tuition fees and other work issues.

    Subscribe to the TG channel “Our GUU” Date of publication: 03/26/2025

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION on energy-intensive industries – B10-0199/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Giorgio Gori, Wouter Beke, Jana Nagyová, Mariateresa Vivaldini, Brigitte van den Berg, Benedetta Scuderi
    on behalf of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy

    B10‑0199/2025

    European Parliament resolution on energy-intensive industries

    (2025/2536(RSP))

    The European Parliament,

     having regard to the report of September 2024 by Mario Draghi entitled ‘On the future of European competitiveness’,

     having regard to the report of April 2024 by Enrico Letta entitled ‘Much more than a market’,

     having regard to the Commission communication of 26 February 2025 entitled ‘The Clean Industrial Deal: A joint roadmap for competitiveness and decarbonisation’ (COM(2025)0085),

     having regard to the Commission communication of 26 February 2025 entitled ‘Action Plan for Affordable Energy’ (COM(2025)0079),

     having regard to the question to the Commission on energy-intensive industries (O‑000010/2025 – B10‑0000/2025),

     having regard to Rules 142(5) and 136(2) of its Rules of Procedure,

     having regard to the motion for a resolution of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy,

    A. whereas energy-intensive industries (EIIs) account for a significant share of the EU’s economy and play a key role in job creation, especially in areas and regions where they are concentrated; whereas EIIs are crucial for the EU’s strategic autonomy and competitiveness, as well as for decarbonisation, taking into account their energy footprint;

    B. whereas the transition to a decarbonised economy and a clean energy system must lead to reducing energy prices and must take into account all available technologies that contribute to reaching the EU’s net zero goal for 2050 in the most cost-efficient way, avoiding lock-in effects and taking into account the different energy mix across Member States, including with regard to renewables and nuclear;

    C. whereas electrification is at the centre of the decarbonisation of EIIs; whereas EIIs include sectors that use fossil resources to meet temperature, pressure or reaction requirements, such as chemicals, steel, paper, plastics, mining, refineries, cement, lime, non-ferrous metals, glass, ceramics and fertilisers, for which greenhouse gas emissions are hard to reduce because they are intrinsic to the process or because of high capital or operating expenditure costs or low technological maturity;

    D. whereas the energy price gap between the EU and the US and China undermines the competitiveness of the EU’s industries; whereas elevated and volatile fossil fuel prices heavily affect electricity prices and the affordable cost of renewable energy sources is not transferred to energy bills;

    E. whereas an insufficiently integrated energy union poses further challenges to EIIs, in particular in relation to the lack of cross-border interconnections and the limited availability of clean energy, owing to lengthy permitting procedures or high capital or operating expenditures, as well as grid congestion;

    F. whereas the emissions trading system (ETS) provided long-term investment signals and helped bring down the emissions of ETS sectors by 47 %; whereas the energy market has profoundly changed since the introduction of the ETS, especially after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the shift from pipeline gas to liquid natural gas (LNG); whereas a lack of carbon market transparency risks hampering EIIs’ competitiveness; whereas ETS revenues are used unevenly across Member States, failing to adequately support EIIs’ decarbonisation;

    G. whereas unnecessary regulatory burdens and lengthy permitting procedures undermine the business case for investing in decarbonisation in Europe; whereas the concept of overriding public interest is provided for in EU legislation; whereas complex and fragmented EU funding impedes timely investment in net-zero technologies and digitalisation, in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs);

    H. whereas the lack of necessary private investment risks hindering EIIs’ decarbonisation; whereas relying excessively on State aid can have the unwanted consequences of exacerbating disparities and distorting competition across the EU;

    I. whereas the EU’s dependencies and limited access, both in quantity and quality, to primary and secondary raw materials pose significant challenges to EIIs; whereas circularity and efficiency can help reduce the annual investment needs in industry and in energy supply; whereas currently, ferrous metals exported to non-EU countries account for more than half of all EU waste exports, raising concerns about their sound treatment;

    J. whereas unfair competition from non-EU countries, including subsidised overcapacity, poses a great challenge to EU companies; whereas many regions around the world do not currently have ambitious decarbonisation targets, thus increasing the risk of carbon leakage;

    K. whereas a profound transformation of EIIs cannot succeed without the involvement of local and regional communities, workers and social partners, which are heavily affected by the transition;

    1. Reiterates its commitment to the EU’s decarbonisation objectives and to stable and predictable climate and industrial policies;

    2. Calls on the Member States to accelerate permitting and licensing processes for clean energy projects, ensuring administrative capacity, and to facilitate grid connections to enable clean, on-site energy generation, especially in remote areas; stresses that the growth of renewables and electrification will require massive investment in grids and in flexibility, storage and distribution networks; calls on the Commission to develop, beyond the concept of overriding public interest, solutions for speeding up decarbonisation projects;

    3. Believes that further action is needed to implement the electricity market design (EMD) rules, especially to promote power purchase agreements (PPAs) and two-way contracts for difference (CfDs) to reduce volatility and energy costs for EIIs; calls on the Commission to propose urgent measures to address current barriers to the signing of long-term agreements, especially for SMEs, using risk reduction instruments and guarantees, including public guarantee such as by the European Investment Bank (EIB); suggests that additional ways to decouple fossil fuel prices from electricity prices be explored, in the framework of the EMD, including with the aim of boosting long-term contracts in line with the affordable energy action plan, and by advancing the analysis of short-term markets to 2025;

    4. Calls on the Commission to assess the possibility of scaling up best practice for EIIs from Member States, such as Italy’s energy release; calls on the Commission to develop recommendations for reducing the exposure of consumers, and especially EIIs, to rising energy costs, such as by reducing taxes and levies and harmonising network charges, while ensuring public investment in grids;

    5. Calls for the enhancement of energy system integration, in particular in relation to cross-border interconnections, to ensure clean and resilient energy supply; asks for increased investment in flexibility, such as storage, including pumped storage hydropower and heat and waste heat storage, and demand response, to optimise grid stability; recalls the importance of energy efficiency in bringing costs down;

    6. Underlines the need to phase out natural gas as soon as possible; stresses that some sectors cannot rely substantially on electrification in the short to medium term; calls on the Member States – over the same time span and for these limited sectors – to develop measures to address gas price spikes in duly justified cases; calls on the Commission to develop tools to ensure gas supply at a mitigated cost, by enabling demand aggregation, building on AggregateEU, and joint gas purchasing, while keeping decarbonisation objectives; highlights the importance of encouraging stable contracts with gas suppliers, diversifying supply routes and improving market transparency and stability, in line with current legislation; calls for an impact assessment in the upcoming ETS review to analyse the relationship between the gas market and CO2 prices and the role of the market stability reserve and its parameters;

    7. Calls on the Commission to support EIIs in adopting clean and net-zero technologies, including hydrogen, and energy-efficient production methods by strengthening funding mechanisms and ensuring that ETS revenue is used effectively by Member States; calls for EU-level support to be complemented by State aid that allows for targeted support to EIIs, while preserving a level playing field within the single market;

    8. Calls for InvestEU to be topped up before the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) and for leftover Resilience and Recovery Facility loans to support investment in EII decarbonisation; notes that the Strategic Technologies for Europe Platform already allows for flexibility within current programmes but that this is insufficient; insists that the upcoming MFF increase funding to support EIIs, building on the Innovation Fund and the Connecting Europe Facility – Energy or through the competitiveness fund; stresses that the European Hydrogen Bank and the carbon contracts for difference programme need to be scaled up; calls on the Commission to build on the Net-Zero Industry Act[1] in the upcoming decarbonisation accelerator act, to streamline the processes for granting permits and strategic project status;

    9. Stresses the need to simplify bureaucratic procedures to enhance the attractiveness of private investment and support EIIs’ transition; believes that both InvestEU and the EIB are pivotal in catalysing private financing, especially through de-risking measures;

    10. Emphasises the need to secure access to critical raw materials; stresses that the upcoming circular economy act should improve resource efficiency, including through better waste management of products containing critical raw materials, as well as fostering the demand and availability of secondary raw materials; stresses the need to define those secondary raw materials that are strategic and that should be subject to export monitoring, such as steel and metal scrap, and to tackle any imbalance in their supply and demand, including by exploring export restrictions; insists on the effective enforcement of the Waste Shipment Regulation[2];

    11. Calls on the Commission to make full and efficient use of trade defence instruments; calls on the Commission to find a permanent solution to address unfair competition and structural overcapacity, before the expiry of current steel safeguard measures in 2026; calls on the Commission to engage with the US in relation to the announced tariffs on EU imports and avoid any harmful escalation;

    12. Stresses that an effective implementation of the carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) is essential to ensure a level playing field for EU industries and prevent carbon leakage, taking into account the impact of the parallel phasing out of the ETS free allowances and the risk of increased production costs; calls on the Commission to address the risks of resource shuffling and circumvention of the CBAM; asks, furthermore, for the implementation of an effective solution for EU exporters and an analysis of the possible extension to further sectors and downstream products, preceded by an impact assessment;

    13. Calls for the creation of lead markets for clean and circular European products, via non-price criteria in EU public procurement, such as sustainability and resilience and a European preference for strategic sectors, as well as by creating voluntary labelling schemes and minimum EU content requirements in a cost-effective way;

    14. Highlights the importance of a just transition to assist areas heavily reliant on EIIs, by keeping and creating quality jobs through upskilling and reskilling programmes for workers and through the effective use of regional support mechanisms, such as the Just Transition Fund and the Cohesion Fund; stresses that public support will be pivotal for the transition of EIIs and that this support should be tied to their commitment to safeguarding employment and working conditions and preventing off-shoring; welcomes the Union of Skills initiative to ensure a good match between skills and labour market demands;

    15. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Commission, the Council and the governments and parliaments of the Member States.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI: Currency Exchange International Announces Voting Results from Annual General Meeting March 25, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    TORONTO, March 26, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Currency Exchange International, Corp. (the “Group” or “CXI”) (TSX: CXI; OTCBB: CURN) is pleased to announce the detailed voting results for the Company’s Annual General Meeting of shareholders held on March 25, 2025 (the “Meeting”). A total of 4,103,217 common shares of the Company (the “Common Shares”), being 65.12% of the issued and outstanding Common Shares as of the record date of February 5, 2025, were present in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting.

    The nominees listed in the management information circular dated February 5, 2025 were elected as directors of the Company at the Meeting. Detailed results of the vote are set out below:

    Nominee Votes For % Withheld %
    Chirag Bhavsar 2,967,242 91.41% 278,814 8.59%
    Chitwant Kohli 2,692,505 82.95% 553,551 17.05%
    Mark Mickleborough 2,692,505 82.95% 553,551 17.05%
    Randolph W. Pinna 3,233,413 99.61% 12,643 0.39%
    V. James Sardo 2,692,505 82.95% 553,551 17.05%
    Stacey Mowbray 2,615,505 80.57% 630,551 19.43%
    Daryl Yeo 2,698,396 83.13% 547,660 16.87%

    Shareholders also approved resolutions appointing Doane Grant Thornton LLP as the Company’s auditors.

    For more information, please refer to the Company’s information circular dated February 5, 2025, available on its SEDAR profile at www.sedarplus.com.

    About Currency Exchange International, Corp.

    Currency Exchange International is in the business of providing comprehensive foreign exchange technology and processing services for banks, credit unions, businesses, and consumers in the United States and select clients globally. Primary products and services include the exchange of foreign currencies, wire transfer payments, Global EFTs, and foreign cheque clearing. Wholesale customers are served through its proprietary FX software applications delivered on its web-based interface, www.cxifx.com (“CXIFX”), its related APIs with core banking platforms, and through personal relationship managers. Consumers are served through Group-owned retail branches, agent retail branches, and its e-commerce platform, order.ceifx.com (“OnlineFX”).

    The Group’s wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary, Exchange Bank of Canada, based in Toronto, Canada, provides foreign exchange and international payment services in Canada and select international foreign jurisdictions. Customers are served through the use of its proprietary software, www.ebcfx.com (“EBCFX”), related APIs to core banking platforms, and personal relationship managers.

    Contact Information

    For further information please contact:
    Bill Mitoulas
    Investor Relations
    (416) 479-9547
    Email: bill.mitoulas@cxifx.com
    Website: www.cxifx.com

    CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

    This press release includes forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. This forward-looking information includes, or may be based upon, estimates, forecasts, and statements as to management’s expectations with respect to, among other things, the voluntary cessation of operations and discontinuance of Exchange Bank of Canada (EBC), the conclusion of referral agreements for customers and selected employees, regulatory approvals required for the discontinuance process, establishing direct correspondent banking relationships to support its U.S. payments business, the management of employee and customer transitions, the Company’s liquidity position during the cessation and discontinuance period, financial performance in fiscal 2025 and 2026, and the associated costs and outcomes of the cessation and discontinuance period in general. Forward-looking statements are identified by the use of terms and phrases such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “predict,” “preliminary,” “project,” “will,” “would,” and similar terms and phrases, including references to assumptions. 

    Forward-looking information is based on the opinions and estimates of management at the date such information is provided and on information available to management at such time. Forward-looking information involves significant risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that could cause the Company’s actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from the results discussed or implied in such forward-looking information. Actual results may differ materially from results indicated in forward-looking information due to a number of factors including, without limitation, the inability of the Company to complete the cessation of EBC and discontinuance in accordance with applicable regulatory and legal requirements on a basis which is cost effective and protects the goodwill of the Company, an inability to establish direct correspondent banking relationships to support its U.S. payments business on terms which are economic or at all, the impact of delays or challenges in obtaining regulatory approvals, a failure to obtain the necessary approvals for referral agreements for customers and selected employees or an inability to conclude such arrangements on a basis which is beneficial to the Company and its selected employees, an inability to manage one-time wind-down costs and severance obligations on cost-effective basis, potential disruptions to operations during the transition period. the risk of reduced liquidity during the transition periods and, generally, the potential for unforeseen liabilities arising during or after the cessation of operations and discontinuance of EBC. 

    Additional risks include the ability of the Company to comply with regulatory requirements in general, the competitive nature of the foreign exchange industry, the impact of geo political changes, and trade wars on factors relevant to the Company’s business, currency exchange risks, the need for the Company to manage its planned growth, the effects of product development and the need for continued technological change, protection of the Company’s proprietary rights, the effect of government regulation and compliance on the Company and the industry in which it operates, network security risks, the ability of the Company to maintain properly working systems, theft and risk of physical harm to personnel, reliance on key management personnel, unexpected losses or challenges associated with customer attrition during the discontinuance, global economic deterioration negatively impacting tourism, volatile securities markets impacting security pricing in a manner unrelated to operating performance and impeding access to capital or increasing the cost of capital, as well as the factors identified throughout this press release and in the section entitled “Financial Risk Factors” of the Company’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis for the twelve months ended October 31, 2024. 

    The forward-looking information contained in this press release represents management’s expectations as of the date hereof (or as of the date such information is otherwise stated to be presented) and is subject to change after such date. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as required under applicable securities laws. 

    The Toronto Stock Exchange does not accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this press release. No stock exchange, securities commission, or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained in this press release. 

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Basel III risk-based capital ratios increase while leverage ratio and Net Stable Funding Ratio remain stable for large internationally active banks in the first half of 2024, latest Basel III monitoring exercise shows

    Source: Bank for International Settlements

    • Basel III risk-based capital ratios increase in the first half of 2024.
    • Banks’ leverage ratio and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) remain stable while Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) decreases slightly.
    • Redesigned dashboards offer new features to explore results.

    Basel III risk-based capital ratios increase while leverage ratio and NSFR remain stable for large internationally active banks in the first half of 2024, according to the latest Basel III monitoring exercise, published today.

    The report, based on data as of 30 June 2024, sets out trends in current bank capital and liquidity ratios and the impact of the fully phased-in Basel III framework, including the December 2017 finalisation of the Basel III reforms and the January 2019 finalisation of the market risk framework. It covers both large international active banks (Group 1) and other smaller banks (Group 2). See note to editors for definitions.

    The implementation of the final elements of the Basel III minimum requirements began on 1 January 2023. At the end of the first half of 2024, the average impact of the fully phased-in final Basel III framework on the Tier 1 minimum required capital (MRC) of Group 1 banks was +1.9%, compared with +1.3% at end-December 2023. Group 1 banks report a minor regulatory capital shortfall of €0.9 billion, compared with no shortfall at end-December 2023.

    The monitoring exercise also collected bank data on Basel III liquidity requirements. The weighted average LCR decreased slightly compared with the previous reporting period to 136% for Group 1 banks. Three Group 1 banks reported an LCR below the minimum requirement of 100%.

    The weighted average NSFR was stable at 124% for Group 1 banks. All banks reported an NSFR above the minimum requirement of 100%.

    Overview of results

    Table 1

      31 December 20231

    30 June 2024

    Group 1 Of which:
    G-SIBs

    Group 1

    Of which:
    G-SIBs
    Current Basel III framework        
    CET1 ratio (%) 13.1  12.8

    13.4

    13.2
    Target capital shortfalls (€ bn)2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    TLAC shortfall 2022 minimum (€ bn) 24.8 24.8 19.4 19.4
    Total accounting assets (€ bn) 86,121 59,456 82,626 61,751
    Leverage ratio (%)3 6.1 6.1 6.1 6.0
    LCR (%) 138.2 135.0 136.0 133.6
    NSFR (%) 122.6 122.8 123.6 123.8
    Fully phased-in final Basel III framework (2028)        
    Change in Tier 1 MRC at the target level (%) 1.3 0.0 1.9 1.5
    CET1 ratio (%) 13.5 13.4 13.1 12.9
    Target capital shortfalls (€ bn); of which: 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9
           CET1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
           Additional Tier 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
           Tier 2 0.0 0.0 0.9 0.9
    TLAC shortfall 2022 minimum (€ bn) 31.1 31.1 19.6 19.6
    Leverage ratio (%)3 6.1 6.0 6.1 6.0

    CET1 = Common Equity Tier 1; G-SIBs = globally systemically important banks; LCR = Liquidity Coverage Ratio; MRC = minimum required capital; NSFR = Net Stable Funding Ratio; TLAC = total loss-absorbing capacity.

    1  The values for the previous period may differ slightly from those published in the previous report. This is caused by data resubmissions for previous periods to improve the underlying data quality and enlarge the time series sample as well as by a change in methodology.    2  These use the 2017 definition of the leverage ratio exposure measure.    3  The leverage ratios reflect temporary exclusions from leverage exposures introduced in some jurisdictions.

    Source: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

    The report is accompanied by interactive Tableau dashboards that allow users to explore the results with greater ease and flexibility. A new design makes the dashboards more user-friendly, and the explanatory text summarising the findings was expanded to cover additional topics including market risk, counterparty credit risk and credit valuation adjustment risk.


    Note to editors

    Through a rigorous reporting process, the Basel Committee regularly reviews the implications of the Basel III standards for banks and has been publishing the results of such exercises since 2012.

    The results shown for “current Basel III framework” reflect the current jurisdictional standards that apply to the reporting banks as of 30 June 2024, which reflect different degrees of implementation of the Basel III reforms. The Basel III implementation dashboard provides an overview of Basel III implementation status across jurisdictions. The results shown for “fully phased-in final Basel III framework (2028)” assume that the positions as of 30 June 2024 were subject to the full application of the Basel III standards. That is, they do not account for transitional arrangements set out in the Basel III framework, which expire on 1 January 2028. No assumptions were made about bank profitability or behavioural responses, such as changes in bank capital or balance sheet composition. For that reason, the results of the study may not be comparable with industry estimates.

    Data are provided for 176 banks, including 115 large internationally active banks. These “Group 1” banks are defined as internationally active banks that have Tier 1 capital of more than €3 billion and include 29 institutions that have been designated as global systemically important banks (G-SIBs). The Basel Committee’s sample also includes 61 “Group 2” banks (ie banks that have Tier 1 capital of less than €3 billion or are not internationally active).

    The values for the previous period may differ slightly from those published in the previous report. This is caused by data resubmissions for previous periods to improve the underlying data quality and enlarge the time series sample as well as by a change in methodology as explained in the report.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Europe: EBA identifies payment fraud, indebtedness and unwarranted de-risking as key issues affecting consumers in the EU

    Source: European Banking Authority

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published today the 9th edition of its biennial Consumer Trends Report for 2024/25. The Report has identified payment fraud, indebtedness, and unwarranted de-risking as the most important issues affecting EU consumers. The Report is based on information provided by the national authorities of the 27 EU Member States, selected national and EU consumer associations, EU industry associations, national ombudsmen, as well as quantitative data from a variety of sources, including for the first time the EBA’s new Retail Risk Indicators, which the EBA publishes separately since 2022 with a view to identify potential consumer harm.

    The Report concludes that payment fraud is still the most significant issue for EU consumers. This also reflects the emergence of new types of fraud, such as social engineering techniques. In this type of scams, payers are manipulated into making a payment to the fraudsters, who have adapted their techniques to elude the application of the strong customer authentication requirements imposed by EU law.

    Indebtedness emerges as the second most relevant issue, with a significant rise of what is commonly referred to as ‘Buy-Now-Pay-Later’ credit and other types of small, fast, accessible and short-term credit. Inadequate creditworthiness assessment practices of lenders and poor disclosure of pre-contractual information are found to be key drivers to indebtedness.

    Unwarranted de-risking is the third most relevant issue, with more consumers facing increased difficulties in opening and retaining payment accounts, access to which is a prerequisite for residents in the EU to be able to participate in the EU economy. This issue materialises in the form of refused onboarding of new and the offboarding of existing consumers and seems to be affecting mostly specific categories of vulnerable consumers, i.e., migrants, refugees, the homeless, cross-border workers, and individuals with poor financial histories.

    Following these findings, the EBA will consider which actions to take in 2025/26 to address the topical issues identified in 2024/25 and with the aim of further enhancing consumer protection across the EU.

    Legal basis and background

    The Consumer Trends Report 2024/25 has been developed in fulfilment of the EBA’s mandate set out in Article 9(1) of its founding Regulation, which requires the Authority to take a leading role in promoting transparency, simplicity and fairness in the market for consumer financial products or services across the internal market, including by collecting, analysing and reporting on consumer trends.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Asian Development Blog: Artificial Intelligence Meets Real Finance: Innovation, Risk, and Regulation

    Source: Asia Development Bank

    Artificial intelligence is reshaping financial services by improving credit scoring, customer service, fraud detection, and risk management across sectors.

    The financial sector is data-intensive and among the most exposed to artificial intelligence. The application of AI in finance is significantly changing how markets operate, risks are managed, and consumers interact with financial services. 

    The use of AI in finance is not something new. Traditional analytics have been applied in various functions throughout the financial system. 

    For example, AI models have been used for rule-based risk analysis in financial intermediation, risk management and portfolio optimization in asset management, and fraud detection in payment systems. 

    In particular, the emerging generative AI technology can generate and execute transactions, even without human intervention. 

    It enables the processing of huge amounts of data at a speed far beyond human capacity. Generative AI thus offers vast opportunities for the financial sector across several functions, including financial intermediation, insurance, asset management, and payment systems. 

    Financial institutions have also used generative AI to strengthen credit scoring, back-end processing, customer support, risk analysis, robo-advising, and know-your-customer processes. 

    These four areas offer interesting opportunities for AI in finance:

    Financial intermediation: Traditional analytics focus on rule-based risk analysis and fostering greater competition. With the adoption of machine learning, financial institutions have improved credit risk analysis, reduced underwriting costs, and expanded financial inclusion. Generative AI takes this further by enabling enhanced credit scoring using unstructured data, streamlining back-end processing, and improving customer support.

    Insurance: Traditional analytics support risk analysis and market competition. Machine learning introduces better risk assessment, lowers processing costs, and enhances fraud detection capabilities. Generative AI enhances risk analysis through the ability to process newly legible data and facilitates easier compliance with regulatory requirements.

    Asset management: Traditional analytics help with risk management, portfolio optimization, and high-frequency trading. Machine learning allows the analysis of new data sources and continues to support high-frequency trading. Generative AI contributes through robo-advising, asset embedding, the development of new financial products, and improved customer service.

    Payments: Traditional analytics are primarily used for fraud detection. Machine learning introduces new liquidity management tools and strengthens fraud detection. Generative AI enhances know-your-customer and anti-money laundering processes, increasing the efficiency and accuracy of identity verification and transaction monitoring.

    To maximize the net benefits for finance, AI regulations must strike a balance between innovation and safety.

    While AI has created numerous benefits for the financial sector, there are some challenges related to its adoption. In particular, there are new risks associated with the use of generative AI. 

    Since AI can be adopted across different functions, processes, and applications, financial systems will likely become more vulnerable to cybersecurity threats. 

    Further, generative AI models are prone to the garbage-in-garbage-out problem, as they tend to capture and sustain the biases and errors inherent in the underlying data that they have been trained on. 

    AI models could also generate hallucinations, which are false or misleading information resulting from incorrect or insufficient training data and faulty assumptions. 

    The use of generative AI can also create systemic risks. The domination of AI supply chain by a few big tech players results in more uniform behavior. This means that failures and disruptions within the AI systems of big tech players can have widespread effects that lead to overall financial instability.   

    Therefore, the key challenge is to build AI regulations that recognize both the risks and benefits of AI adoption. This would help maximize the benefits of AI for finance while minimizing its risks. 

    The principles underlying AI regulations must encompass social and environmental well-being, transparency and accountability, and fairness and protection of privacy. 

    Given differences in countries’ level of development and extent of AI adoption, global cooperation on AI regulation is also important.

    The adoption of AI can deliver potentially large benefits for the financial sector. However, AI also poses systemic risks and potential market disruptions. 

    To maximize the net benefits for finance, AI regulations must strike a balance between innovation and safety. Doing so requires international cooperation, transparency, and adaptable principles that can keep up with fast-evolving AI technologies.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Russia: With the support of the State University of Management: “School in Nekrasovka” becomes a forge of banking personnel

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: State University of Management – Official website of the State –

    GUU and “School in Nekrasovka” will create entrepreneurship and environmental classes. Agreements on this were reached during a meeting held on March 25, 2025 at the State University of Management between Rector Vladimir Stroyev and the school director, Deputy Chairperson of the Commission on Education and Youth Policy of the Moscow City Duma Maya Bulaeva.

    Also present at the meeting from the GUU side were Vice-Rector Dmitry Bryukhanov and Advisor to the Rectorate Nikolay Mikhailov, Director of the Career Guidance Center Elena Likhatskikh and her deputy Andrey Kolchin. And from the guests side – Deputy Director of the school for maintenance Olga Shuvanova and partner-employer, representative of Alfa-Bank Dmitry Belyavsky.

    At the beginning of the meeting, welcoming the guests, the rector called the State University of Management a “district-forming university” since residents and enterprises of Vykhino-Zhulebino use the university’s infrastructure, its swimming pool, sports complex, assembly hall, and the former prefect of the South-Eastern Administrative District Vladimir Zotov still actively works at the Department of State and Municipal Management.

    Director of the School in Nekrasovka Maya Bulaeva shared that she has been trying to build a school-university-enterprise line for a long time, but has not been able to establish connections with the middle management. The school actively cooperates with Alfa-Bank within the framework of the Moscow Department of Education and Science project “Entrepreneurial Class”. “The school works, the bank invests, but ultimately does not receive results in the form of young specialists. We ask for help to fill this gap,” Maya Valeryevna addressed the management of the State University of Management.

    Vladimir Stroyev agreed that today there is a noticeable shortage of personnel even in the most prestigious banks. Modern youth should be prepared in advance for a serious attitude towards their career, build personal connections, otherwise graduates will be immediately “taken apart” by competitors. “Our option of training specialists from school is very effective, it is almost an ideal scheme, especially since we are also geographically close,” the rector noted.

    Maya Bulaeva also suggested creating environmental classes, especially since the rector’s advisor Nikolai Mikhailov is the head of the department of “Ecology and Nature Management” and a member of the Russian Geographical Society. The university has a solid scientific foundation, and the “School in Nekrasovka” has excellent teachers who prepare winners of environmental Olympiads. In addition, there is already a partner in mind that is ready for cooperation – the Moscow Zoo.

    Vladimir Stroyev expressed readiness for any cooperation options, provided that the planned initiatives are worked out in detail. In addition, he, together with the vice-rector of the State University of Management Dmitry Bryukhanov, spoke about the unique system of project-based learning at our university, which allows employers to select potential employees starting from the first year without financial investments.

    During the further conversation it became clear that the School in Nekrasovka has developed the teaching of Chinese, which is useful for future specialists given Russia’s current orientation toward Eastern markets. Continuing this topic, Vladimir Stroyev told the guests about cooperation with the Ministry of Economic Development, in particular about foreign internships and the All-Russian competition of socially responsible initiatives of entrepreneurs and NPOs “My Good Business”, the third season of which is nearing completion. Maya Bulaeva was especially interested in the competition of social entrepreneurs and received an invitation from the rector to take part in the award ceremony for the winners.

    Subscribe to the TG channel “Our GUU” Date of publication: 03/26/2025

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Global Economy – KOF Economic Forecast, spring 2025: Swiss economy caught in the tension between trade conflict and fiscal stimulus

    Source: KOF Economic Institute

    Uncertainty is currently unusually high owing to the geopolitical strategy of the new US administration. Assuming that the international trade conflict does not escalate any further, KOF is forecasting that real sport-adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) will increase by 1.4 per cent in 2025. Although this international trade conflict is a burden, the fiscal stimulus expected in individual European Union (EU) countries is boosting economic activity. This is improving the outlook for the Swiss economy. KOF is predicting GDP growth of 1.9 per cent for 2026. The labour market will turn the corner and inflation will remain low. However, this forecast is subject to considerable downside risks.

    The economic outlook is largely being determined by the latest economic policy events. In particular, the geopolitical strategy adopted by the new US administration has far-reaching consequences for global economic developments. While the current trade conflict is acting as a drag on the international economy, EU countries’ additional fiscal packages should provide increasing impetus from the end of this year and improve the economic outlook in Switzerland’s key European markets.

    Growing trade policy uncertainty is weighing on the investment plans of Swiss firms and households. Adjusted for one-off effects, the investment situation remains subdued for the time being. If the fiscal programmes of European trading partners take effect, this should reduce economic policy uncertainty in Europe, provide positive stimulus and boost the economy. This will primarily benefit manufacturing – especially suppliers to the defence sector – and industry-related services. Through the transmission mechanism of foreign trade this should stimulate investment in equipment and, indirectly, private consumption. Major infrastructure projects and fiscal stimulus from Europe should also directly or indirectly support construction investment during the forecast period.

    Swiss labour market stabilising, real wages rising

    Private consumption will be underpinned by the stabilising labour market. Employment and the number of people in work are likely to increase in line with GDP growth over the next few years, while the unemployment rate as defined by the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) will rise only slowly and will soon peak at 3 per cent. KOF expects real wages – according to the Swiss wage index (SLI) – to rise by 0.9 per cent this year and 0.6 per cent next year.

    Low inflationary pressures: KOF does not expect any further interest-rate cuts by the SNB during the forecast period

    Inflation – as measured by the national consumer price index (CPI) – fell to 0.3 per cent in February compared with the same month last year and has thus been below 1 per cent for six months now. KOF is forecasting inflation rates of 0.5 per cent for this year and 0.6 per cent for next year. Following the recent reduction in the Swiss National Bank’s (SNB) key interest rates by 25 basis points to 0.25 per cent, KOF does not expect to see any further interest-rate cuts during the forecast period.

    High uncertainty during the trade conflict; downside risks predominant

    As it is still unclear which of the trade policy measures threatened by the Trump administration to date will ultimately be implemented and what further measures might follow, the latest forecast is subject to greater uncertainty than usual, with downside risks predominating. In order to factor in this uncertainty, KOF has used its new trade model to carry out additional calculations, which analyse in detail the possible trade policy measures and their potential impact on both international trade and the Swiss economy. This analysis shows that if the trade conflict spread, this could entail considerable downside risks for the Swiss economy.

    The main downside risk is that the US government imposes further tariffs on other countries and products, including any retaliatory tariffs implemented in response. In addition, the fiscal stimulus introduced in Europe may be ineffective or only materialise with a delay. And, finally, geopolitical conflicts such as the wars in Ukraine and the Middle East could escalate, impacting commodity prices and global trade.

    There is an upside risk that the US government’s threatened tariffs will only be used as a bargaining chip and will either not be introduced or will be withdrawn after just a short period of time. And, last but not least, a swift end to the war in Ukraine and a solution to the Middle East conflict could have a positive impact on energy prices and global trade.

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI China: Announcement on Open Market Operations No.58 [2025]

    Source: Peoples Bank of China

    Announcement on Open Market Operations No.58 [2025]

    (Open Market Operations Office, March 26, 2025)

    The People’s Bank of China conducted reverse repo operations in the amount of RMB455.4 billion through quantity bidding at a fixed interest rate on March 26, 2025.

    Details of the Reverse Repo Operations

    Maturity

    Rate

    Bidding Volume

    Winning Bid Volume

    7 days

    1.50%

    RMB455.4 billion

    RMB455.4 billion

    Date of last update Nov. 29 2018

    2025年03月26日

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Outcome of the meetings of EU leaders on 20 March 2025 – 26-03-2025

    Source: European Parliament 2

    With the geopolitical situation evolving rapidly in the first months of 2025, EU leaders had already convened three times in advance of their regular March meeting. Next to competitiveness – originally due to be the central focus point – the spring European Council meeting covered issues including Ukraine, the Middle East and European defence. On competitiveness, the EU-27 outlined precise directions to accelerate the EU’s economic agenda, focusing on three priorities: cutting red tape, ensuring affordable energy and turning savings into investments. Following Hungary’s renewed refusal to agree to conclusions on Ukraine, a separate statement, ‘firmly supported by 26 Heads of State or Government’, was published, emphasising the EU’s commitment to provide further comprehensive support to Ukraine and to contribute to security guarantees. As European Council President António Costa intended, the meeting concluded in one day. It started with the customary speech by Parliament’s President, Roberta Metsola, who told EU leaders that Europe had ‘thrived on soft power’ for decades, but with the global order now changing, ‘Europe must position itself as a force to be reckoned with’. This requires ‘getting serious about our security, our readiness and our competitiveness’. There was a working lunch with United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, and an exchange of views with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In the afternoon, a Euro Summit in inclusive format took place in the presence of European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde and Eurogroup President Paschal Donohoe. Over dinner, EU leaders held a first discussion on the next long-term EU budget and own resources.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Result of the Daily Variable Rate Repo (VRR) auction held on March 26, 2025

    Source: Reserve Bank of India

    Tenor 1-day
    Notified Amount (in ₹ crore) 75,000
    Total amount of bids received (in ₹ crore) 35,486
    Amount allotted (in ₹ crore) 35,486
    Cut off Rate (%) 6.26
    Weighted Average Rate (%) 6.27
    Partial Allotment Percentage of bids received at cut off rate (%) NA

    Ajit Prasad          
    Deputy General Manager
    (Communications)    

    Press Release: 2024-2025/2461

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Money Market Operations as on March 25, 2025

    Source: Reserve Bank of India


    (Amount in ₹ crore, Rate in Per cent)

      Volume
    (One Leg)
    Weighted
    Average Rate
    Range
    A. Overnight Segment (I+II+III+IV) 5,97,724.73 6.25 5.15-6.65
         I. Call Money 18,953.50 6.30 5.15-6.45
         II. Triparty Repo 4,11,280.25 6.21 5.50-6.40
         III. Market Repo 1,65,836.08 6.35 5.70-6.60
         IV. Repo in Corporate Bond 1,654.90 6.60 6.60-6.65
    B. Term Segment      
         I. Notice Money** 345.50 6.42 6.05-6.50
         II. Term Money@@ 220.00 6.80-7.30
         III. Triparty Repo 2,735.75 6.78 6.40-7.25
         IV. Market Repo 999.41 6.80 6.80-6.80
         V. Repo in Corporate Bond 0.00
      Auction Date Tenor (Days) Maturity Date Amount Current Rate /
    Cut off Rate
    C. Liquidity Adjustment Facility (LAF), Marginal Standing Facility (MSF) & Standing Deposit Facility (SDF)
    I. Today’s Operations
    1. Fixed Rate          
    2. Variable Rate&          
      (I) Main Operation          
         (a) Repo          
         (b) Reverse Repo          
      (II) Fine Tuning Operations          
         (a) Repo Tue, 25/03/2025 1 Wed, 26/03/2025 95,653.00 6.26
         (b) Reverse Repo          
      (III) Long Term Operations^          
         (a) Repo          
         (b) Reverse Repo          
    3. MSF# Tue, 25/03/2025 1 Wed, 26/03/2025 389.00 6.50
    4. SDFΔ# Tue, 25/03/2025 1 Wed, 26/03/2025 1,77,285.00 6.00
    5. Net liquidity injected from today’s operations [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*       -81,243.00  
    II. Outstanding Operations
    1. Fixed Rate          
    2. Variable Rate&          
      (I) Main Operation          
         (a) Repo          
         (b) Reverse Repo          
      (II) Fine Tuning Operations          
         (a) Repo Fri, 21/03/2025 5 Wed, 26/03/2025 46,204.00 6.26
         (b) Reverse Repo          
      (III) Long Term Operations^          
         (a) Repo Fri, 21/02/2025 45 Mon, 07/04/2025 57,951.00 6.26
      Fri, 14/02/2025 49 Fri, 04/04/2025 75,003.00 6.28
      Fri, 07/02/2025 56 Fri, 04/04/2025 50,010.00 6.31
         (b) Reverse Repo          
    3. MSF#          
    4. SDFΔ#          
    D. Standing Liquidity Facility (SLF) Availed from RBI$       9,517.09  
    E. Net liquidity injected from outstanding operations [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*     2,38,685.09  
    F. Net liquidity injected (outstanding including today’s operations) [injection (+)/absorption (-)]*     1,57,442.09  
    G. Cash Reserves Position of Scheduled Commercial Banks
         (i) Cash balances with RBI as on March 25, 2025 9,49,616.35  
         (ii) Average daily cash reserve requirement for the fortnight ending April 04, 2025 9,28,983.00  
    H. Government of India Surplus Cash Balance Reckoned for Auction as on¥ March 25, 2025 95,653.00  
    I. Net durable liquidity [surplus (+)/deficit (-)] as on March 07, 2025 54,323.00  
    @ Based on Reserve Bank of India (RBI) / Clearing Corporation of India Limited (CCIL).
    – Not Applicable / No Transaction.
    ** Relates to uncollateralized transactions of 2 to 14 days tenor.
    @@ Relates to uncollateralized transactions of 15 days to one year tenor.
    $ Includes refinance facilities extended by RBI.
    & As per the Press Release No. 2019-2020/1900 dated February 06, 2020.
    Δ As per the Press Release No. 2022-2023/41 dated April 08, 2022.
    * Net liquidity is calculated as Repo+MSF+SLF-Reverse Repo-SDF.
    ¥ As per the Press Release No. 2014-2015/1971 dated March 19, 2015.
    # As per the Press Release No. 2023-2024/1548 dated December 27, 2023.
    ^ As per the Press Release No. 2024-2025/2082 dated February 05, 2025, Press Release No. 2024-2025/2138 dated February 12, 2025, and Press Release No. 2024-2025/2209 dated February 20, 2025.
    Ajit Prasad          
    Deputy General Manager
    (Communications)    
    Press Release: 2024-2025/2460

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI China: Russia, US agree to ensure implementing Black Sea initiative

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    Russia and the United States have agreed to ensure the implementation of the Black Sea Initiative, provided that sanctions were eased on Russia’s agricultural and food trade, the Kremlin said Tuesday.

    The Kremlin said the agreement includes ensuring the safety of navigation in the Black Sea, the non-use of force, and preventing commercial ships from being used for military purposes, with inspections in place to enforce this.

    It also added that the United States will help in restoring Russia’s access to global markets for agricultural and fertilizer exports, lowering shipping insurance costs, and improving access to ports and international payment systems.

    The agreement will enter into force after a series of sanctions and restrictions related to its agricultural and food trade were lifted, the Kremlin noted.

    The move would include lifting Western sanctions on the Russian Agricultural Bank, which services agricultural businesses, and reconnecting the bank to the SWIFT international messaging system.

    Russia has also listed in the conditions the removal of restrictions on its food and fertilizer producers and exporters, on the servicing of related Russian-flagged vessels in ports, and on the related agricultural machinery supplies to Russia.

    The Kremlin statement came after Russian and U.S. representatives wrapped up their Monday’s talks in Riyadh, capital of Saudi Arabia, where both sides sought arrangements for the safety of navigation in the Black Sea.

    Russia and Ukraine signed separately with Türkiye and the United Nations the Black Sea Grain Initiative in Istanbul in July 2022, which secured the export of Ukrainian grain and other agricultural products from Black Sea ports.

    As a parallel agreement, Russia and the UN signed a memorandum of understanding on the facilitation of Russian food and fertilizer exports.

    On July 17, 2023, Russia suspended its participation in the Black Sea deal, citing unfulfilled commitments to the Russian part. 

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Headline and underlying inflation fall in February

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    New figures show that headline and underlying inflation fell last month.

    This is more positive and promising news that shows we’re making progress together in the fight against inflation.

    Monthly inflation fell to 2.4 per cent in the year to February 2025.

    Annual trimmed mean inflation fell to 2.7 per cent.

    Today’s headline result was below the median market expectation.

    Inflation was high and rising when we came to government and now it’s much lower and falling.

    Headline inflation has been at or below the midpoint of the Reserve Bank’s target band for six consecutive months.

    Underlying inflation has been below three per cent for three consecutive months.

    This is even more proof that inflation continues to moderate in our economy.

    The Budget we handed down this week continues the fight against inflation and shows that Treasury now expects inflation to return sustainably to the target band six months sooner – in the middle of this year, rather than at the end.

    Today’s result is a reminder of our substantial and sustained progress in the fight against inflation.

    Under Labor, inflation is down, wages are up, unemployment is low, interest rates have started to come down and we’ve topped up our tax relief to give every taxpayer two new tax cuts from next year.

    We know that these monthly numbers are volatile and can bounce around but the direction of travel on inflation is clear.

    On the official quarterly measure, inflation under Labor is almost a third of the 6.1 per cent we inherited. Australia’s inflation is now lower than most major advanced economies.

    While most other advanced economies have paid for progress on inflation with much higher unemployment, growth going backwards, or a recession, we’ve managed to preserve the progress we’ve made in our labour market while inflation has come down.

    Electricity prices fell 13.2 cent in the year to February but would have fallen only 1.2 per cent without the energy rebates for every household we are rolling out with the states.

    Rents rose 5.5 per cent in the year but would have increased 6.8 per cent without the recent increase to Commonwealth Rent Assistance.

    Even with this substantial progress, we know people are still under pressure and that’s why our cost‑of‑living help is so important.

    We’re delivering two new tax cuts that will put an average of about $50 a week back in taxpayers’ pockets when combined with our tax cuts from 2024.

    Our Budget is all about helping with the cost of living and finishing the fight against inflation, strengthening Medicare and building Australia’s future.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: Australia stands firm behind its foreign aid in the budget, but the future remains precarious

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Melissa Conley Tyler, Honorary Fellow, Asia Institute, The University of Melbourne

    This week’s budget will come as a relief to Australia’s neighbours in the Indo-Pacific that rely on development assistance. The Albanese government did not follow the lead of US President Donald Trump and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in cutting its foreign aid.

    The Trump administration froze foreign assistance and dismantled the US Agency for International Development (USAID) when it came into office. Meanwhile, the UK announced 40% aid cuts of its own.

    It is to Australia’s credit this has not happened here. Australia’s development budget remains intact this year and in forward estimates.

    Sensible policymakers seem to recognise that Australia’s strategic circumstances are different. As a nation surrounded by low- and middle-income countries, Australia cannot vacate the field on development issues without enormous reputational, diplomatic and strategic damage.

    This budget shows Australia is committed to its region – with 75% of the foreign assistance budget flowing to the Indo-Pacific – and sees development partnerships as a way to solve shared problems.

    What’s in the budget for aid and development

    The details of the development budget show Australia has been listening to its partners to identify critical gaps and reprioritise funds.

    In the Pacific, funding has risen to a historic high, with no country receiving less aid. There have been changes in focus to respond to the US funding cuts, including programs on HIV/AIDS in Papua New Guinea and Fiji and gender-based violence in the Pacific.

    This fits with Australia’s desire to be a partner of choice – and to prevent an increased Chinese presence in the region.

    In Southeast Asia, Australia has increased its aid to all countries and has shifted funding, particularly in health where the US was a major donor.

    This is in Australia’s interest. A new program on Indonesian human and animal health, for example, will help prevent health system failures in areas such as tuberculosis and polio elimination on Australia’s doorstep.

    Funds have also been reallocated to support civil society organisations working in vital areas like media freedom and human rights, which would have been a casualty in the US cuts.

    There was also a shift in humanitarian funding to Myanmar and Bangladesh, where the US aid withdrawal has left Rohingya refugees in a desperate state.

    Importantly, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade is helping local organisations survive US cuts by allowing temporary flexibility in the use of grant funding to help them continue to deliver essential services.

    Beyond these reprioritisations, the other heartening thing about the budget is its normality.

    It maintains funding for assistive technology for people with disabilities and an Inclusion and Equality Fund to support LGBTQIA+ civil society organisations and human rights defenders. There are programs on maternal health, including reproductive rights.

    The future is still precarious

    However, it would be wrong to think this budget will fill the gaps left by the US withdrawal.

    The ANU Development Policy Centre estimates that traditional OECD donors will cut at least 25% of their aid by 2027. It said, “when that much of a thing goes missing, it’s clearly at risk of collapse”.

    Some development organisations will close their doors, potentially including household names that Australians have donated to for years. This is a time of huge transformation for the sector.

    Another future problem will be maintaining multilateral institutions that rely on US funding – including the World Health Organization, World Food Programme, World Bank and Asian Development Bank. This will require a concerted effort with other countries.

    So, while the Australian budget shows a government deploying current funding as intelligently as possible, there will eventually be limits to this approach.

    In the “new world of uncertainty” described in the treasurer’s budget speech, it simply won’t be possible to meet Australia’s strategic aims and keep development spending at its current rate. It is still far away from 1% of the federal budget.

    At some point, Australia must rethink the trajectory of its international commitments.

    Analysis by the Development Intelligence Lab, a think tank working on development cooperation in the Indo-Pacific, has shown that over the last 25 years, the international parts of the federal budget – defence, intelligence, diplomacy and development – have held steady at around 10%.

    In a time of disruption, this might need to change. In 1949, for example, Australia invested almost 9% of the federal budget on development and diplomacy alone – not including defence.

    Those in the foreign aid sector can celebrate Australia has not pulled back on its commitments like the US and UK. At the same time, we should expect the next government will inevitably be called on to do more.

    Melissa Conley Tyler is Executive Director at the Asia-Pacific Development, Diplomacy & Defence Dialogue (AP4D), an initiative funded by the foreign affairs and defence portfolios and hosted by the Australian Council for International Development..

    ref. Australia stands firm behind its foreign aid in the budget, but the future remains precarious – https://theconversation.com/australia-stands-firm-behind-its-foreign-aid-in-the-budget-but-the-future-remains-precarious-253028

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Shareholder activism: reflections on the current, and future, landscape

    Source: Allens Insights (legal sector)

    Campaigns keep evolving, with more high stakes ahead 11 min read

    Last year was another big one for shareholder activists globally, with investor sentiment in 2024 taking its cues from disruption across the broader economic and geopolitical landscape. Closer to home, activity was more stable in Australia—as it typically is, owing to our smaller footprint, more stringent company laws and stable markets—but campaigns continue to evolve, with activists refining their strategies to both capitalise on financial opportunities and seek redress for governance concerns.

    We expect high stakes for the rest of the year as the Trump administration’s policies upend commercial and regulatory settings and potentially tip the scales in favour of activists. While shareholder activism is now a standard part of the investment landscape in the US, the practice is reverberating around Australia and the rest of the world.

    In this Insight, we bring together the key takeaways from 2024 and provide our thoughts on what we see ahead.

    A snapshot of the numbers

    Activist activity has well and truly bounced back from the subdued levels brought about by the pandemic.

    Over 1000 companies were targeted by activist campaigns worldwide for the second consecutive year.1 The US continues to be the epicentre of activity, with nearly 600 US-listed companies facing activist demands, marking a 7% increase from 2023 and 16% from 2022. There was a strong showing from non-traditional and first-time activists—a record-breaking 160 different investors launched campaigns in the US in 2024, which included 45 first-time activists, also a record.

    Activity in Asia was similarly strong (particularly in Japan and South Korea), though Europe trended down, owing to ongoing disruption brought about by the conflict in Ukraine and generally subdued economic activity. There, the United Kingdom hosts the lion’s share of activity, with 42% of campaigns targeting British companies.

    Australia saw a modest rise in activity year on year, with 56 companies targeted, up nominally from the 54 campaigns recorded in 2023. While the volume of campaigns remained steady, the effectiveness of Australian activists improved—activists were assessed as having achieved their objectives in 25% of resolved campaigns, up from 16% in 2023.

    Despite this, Australian activists struggled to secure board representation in target companies, with only seven board seats gained in 2024, down significantly from 26 in 2023. This divergence suggests that although activism remains a powerful force for corporate engagement, the dominant institutional investors and influential proxy advisors remain selective and largely hesitant in delivering changes at the board level.

    All up, campaign volumes continue to be strong, though success is trickier to measure. Whether the public demands of activists are met is one tangible way of assessing effectiveness, but the overall impact of a campaign can often manifest in less direct ways. For example, the opportunity cost of management in responding to a campaign, the inherent value derived from the ensuing publicity and any derivative or other trading in the target securities—and, of course, the concessions that play out behind closed doors—often contribute to the effectiveness of shareholder activism.

    Stories from the front line

    These are some of the headline-grabbing campaigns that played out in the last year or so that have set the tone for activist causes.

    One of the most closely watched activist campaigns was Glenview Capital’s attempt to gain board representation at CVS Health. Glenview increased its stake in CVS in the third quarter of 2024 by 31%, making its US$635 million holding (equivalent to 1% of the stock) the largest of all three activist hedge funds with an interest in the company. The intervention came following a 27% drop in share price since the beginning of 2024, a market reaction reportedly attributed to higher medical costs in CVS’s insurance segment caused by an influx of medical procedures delayed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Glenview secured four board seats in November 2024, including Glenview CEO Larry Robbins. It was reported that the board appointments were made amid the prospect of Glenview initiating a public and more aggressive proxy fight. This case highlights the increasing sophistication of activist investors targeting high-profile global companies, and underscores the importance of clear, proactive shareholder engagement strategies—a strategy that Australian boards should observe as activism intensifies.

    The activist campaign led by Elliott Investment Management resulted in a change of CEO at Starbucks and a correspondent increase in share value by 24%, equating to US$26 billion in value and marking the company’s most successful day since its initial public offering in 1992.

    In July 2024, it was reported that Elliott had become one of the largest investors in Starbucks, and sought to leverage its position by presenting a proposal to the board for an overhaul of domestic and international strategy. The move followed the stock price having declined by 24% since the former CEO, Laxman Narasimhan, was appointed in March 2023. While Elliott approached the board in private and did not publicly advocate for a replacement CEO, there were persistent leaks to the media, which commentators assessed as likely prompting the decision. On 13 August 2024, the board announced the appointment of Brian Niccol, former CEO of restaurant chain Chipotle, who is credited with Chipotle’s modernisation and an increase in its stock price by 770% since 2018.

    The campaign illustrates that one response strategy in dealing with activists, particularly high-profile investors, can be to move pre-emptively to instigate change before the issues are forced.

    In June 2024, Elliott also disclosed an 11% economic stake in Southwest Airlines worth US$1.9 billion, and converted enough of its derivate holdings in September to amass a 10% common stock holding that enabled Elliott to call a special meeting. Conversely to its approach for Starbucks, it engaged in a more public campaign, by proposing that ‘enhancing the board, upgrading leadership and a comprehensive business review’ were necessary to increase Southwest’s stock price. In October 2024, it was announced that Southwest would appoint five independent directors nominated by Elliott in addition to another board member, and that the former chief executive and then chairman would accelerate his retirement. Following the announcement of the personnel changes, Elliott withdrew its demand for a special shareholder meeting intended to replace 10 members of Southwest’s 15-person board. Elliott’s influence has continued to grow since then, with Southwest disclosing on 19 February 2025 that the company’s agreement with Elliott has been amended to increase the maximum aggregate economic exposure that Elliott may acquire, from 14.9% to 19.9%, but limit it from acquiring more than 12.49% of outstanding common stock until 1 April 2026. When Elliott disclosed its position in June 2024, the Southwest stock price was US$29.70, and as at 14 March 2025, it was US$31.73.

    Consistent with the sentiments of the Trump administration’s focus on rolling back diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs, a group of Apple shareholders submitted on 25 February 2025 a proposal titled ‘Request to Cease DEI Efforts’. This was rejected at Apple’s shareholder meeting in February 2025, with 97.67% of the vote being against the proposal. The campaign against Apple is one of several anti-DEI proposals that have been levied against prominent companies, including Costco, where the proposal was defeated by 98% of votes, and farm equipment maker John Deere, where the proposal was defeated by 98.7%. These proposals have attracted significant attention, by harnessing viral social media campaigns advocating for customer boycotts, inundating company social media accounts with negative comments, and lobbing the threat of lawsuits alleging that DEI initiatives constitute a breach of fiduciary duty. Despite the spotlight (or perhaps because of it?), shareholders of the world’s most valuable listed company voted overwhelmingly not to abandon its DEI initiatives.

    Activist themes

    We see two broad themes that motivate activists at the moment. For the reasons set out in the next section, we think the global economic and geopolitical settings provide an opportunity to shape activist behaviours.

    First, there is the more traditional activist strategy where professional investors identify companies that they perceive could optimise their performance or enhance their governance structures, and then seek to exert influence to encourage the company to focus on increasing shareholder returns. They do this by pushing for one or a combination of:

    Second, there is the rising influence of public sentiment and political undercurrents playing out in the theatre of public markets, and the volatility that comes with it. Activist campaigns are increasingly becoming a proxy for broader societal dissatisfaction.

    In Australia, this dual-track activism—balancing financial imperatives with political and social influences—reinforces the heightened investor expectations for action and accountability for these issues at the board level.

    For instance, shareholder dissent on pay has markedly increased in Australia recently, seeing over 40 strikes among ASX 300 companies in 2023 and 2024, compared with 22–26 strikes recorded between 2018 and 2022.2 Among those receiving a strike was the Australian Securities Exchange itself, with 26.15% of votes against the adoption of the remuneration report. Commentators assessed that the vote was an expression of shareholder dissatisfaction with the $250 million write-down and anticipated cost of a further $300 million to replace the CHESS technology system. Although 13 companies in the ASX 300 received a second strike in 2024, not a single board spill proposal came close to succeeding, with none receiving more than 20% of votes in favour.3 This demonstrates that while strikes are increasing, this is not being accompanied by momentum to trigger broader change to leadership structures—it would appear that shareholders are looking to use their vote to send a shot across the bow as an appropriate warning, rather than achieve a fundamental governance reset.

    Shareholders and special interest groups have also used the proxy forum to express dissatisfaction regarding climate action, reflecting broader societal concerns around environmental sustainability and climate change. Last year, Market Forces led an activist campaign against Woodside Energy, advocating for an overhaul to its climate transition action plan and encouraging other shareholders to push for further board renewal at the 2025 AGM. At the AGM in April 2024, 58.4% of proxies cast were against the transition strategy, following three hours of questions. Earlier this month, another activist shareholder group, the Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility, advised investors to vote against the re-election of all three directors standing at the 2025 AGM and continues to integrate climate concerns into its analysis of shareholder returns.

    There is a similar experience in the UK, where Shell shareholders are still asked to vote on resolutions brought by activists to align the company’s medium-term emissions reduction targets with the 2015 Paris Climate Agreement and to factor ‘Scope 3’ emissions from fuels burnt by consumers into such calculations. Although the resolution received just 18.6% support from shareholders in 2024 (down 1.4% from 2023), the sustained pressure and media exposure may have contributed to the environmental, social and governance (ESG) proposals instead advanced by Shell’s board.

    For a more detailed analysis of the specific tactics that activists deploy pursuing these issues and how companies can prepare, see our earlier Insight.

    Our expectations for the road ahead

    Economic and geopolitical disruption to fuel activity

    The global economy is currently experiencing disruption. The focal point is, of course, the US, where the combination of (promised) tax cuts and deregulation will free up capital for investors to pursue short-term opportunities. As the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority Chair, John Lonsdale, remarked in his recent address at the Australian Financial Review Banking Summit, ‘what happens in the world’s biggest economy has implications for the world, and therefore for Australia’. We thus expect the positive conditions for activists will spill across borders, and perhaps the momentum will too—the Australian Securities and Investments Commission recently outlined its first steps towards easing compliance obligations for directors.

    The hoped-for spike in M&A activity creates the opportunity for shareholder activism, so we anticipate elevated volumes of activity in the near term. At the same time, the imposition of tariffs and other protectionist policies—and the market volatility and trade war they may set off—will create winners and losers, with companies that struggle in the turbulence becoming targets for activists.

    A reckoning on ESG and DEI initiatives

    There has been mounting pushback on ESG and, more recently, DEI policies of corporations, with activists querying their necessity and appropriateness. Critics, who may not be shareholders, will be even more emboldened by the priorities and tone of the Trump administration.

    We expect that activists will continue to seek out opportunities to make high-profile examples of some companies. However, while proponents of these initiatives have attracted significant attention, we haven’t yet seen this noise translate into strong shareholder support for campaigns, as the recent experience with Apple demonstrates.

    The anti-anti-ESG and DEI cause

    While some activists are seeking to challenge ESG and DEI initiatives as a corporate priority, we anticipate others that may already be frustrated with perceived slow progress on sustainability, diversity and broader governance issues will look to double down and push for companies to stay the course.

    This sentiment will be particularly emboldened if governments consider rolling back regulations or shifting priorities. If it is perceived that lawmakers and regulators aren’t creating the framework to manage these issues, then we expect activists to take matters into their own hands by using shareholder meetings as forums or otherwise turning to the courts.

    Scrutiny of board composition and director accountability

    We are seeing investors pay closer attention to the fitness for office of individual board members, by using their vote to signal dissatisfaction and impose accountability for governance missteps when directors stand for election or re-election. This can be in relation to a company that has experienced an issue, or could follow individual directors to unrelated companies.

    Expect to see closer scrutiny of board composition and more protest votes against director elections. Even if candidates still easily obtain the ordinary majority needed to carry the resolution, this is a far cry from the near 100% backing candidates would typically receive, and, particularly for larger companies, shows at least some institutional investors (whose holding may have previously been seen as more passive) are sending a message.

    Leveraging technology and AI in activist strategies

    Artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed a number of different fields, and has a role to play in the shareholder activism space as well, by making campaigns data driven and, as a consequence, more cost effective.

    AI can be deployed by activists to monitor and analyse tremendous amounts of data associated with corporate disclosures and financial performance, and to recognise the vulnerabilities and patterns in would-be candidates for a campaign. As these tools grow in sophistication, we expect to see activists be able to penetrate the market more deeply, and move with greater efficiency and precision in identifying opportunities.

    Activism has never been a simple strategy. We anticipate a continued evolution of the activist playbook in light of the above.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Pittsford father and son facing multiple fraud and ID theft charges in Rochester area credit card scam

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    ROCHESTER, NY—U.S. Attorney Michael DiGiacomo announced today that Talib Hussain, 74, and Mirza Khan, 46, both of Pittsford, NY, were charged by criminal complaint with bank fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. The charges carry a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison and a $1,000,000 fine.

    Assistant U.S. Attorney Meghan K. McGuire, who is handling the case, stated that according to the complaint, since January 2015, JP Morgan Chase, Discover Financial Services, Pentagon Federal Credit Union, Bank of America, Barclay Bank, US Bank, Capital One and American Express have identified fraudulent credit card activity in the Rochester area. A high number of newly issued credit cards were charged to their maximum credit limit and almost all the cards had no valid payments applied to the accounts.

    The investigation determined that several of the credit cards were connected. The credit cards were applied for using an actual social security number but a fabricated name and date of birth to create a new, or “synthetic” identity, which was then used to acquire lines-of-credit used by the creator and/or his co-conspirators to make fraudulent purchases until the credit limit was reached. Some of them were used to pay property taxes to the City of Rochester and the Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation bills for properties in Rochester, including Lucky Beverage on Norton Street, Chili Express on Chili Avenue, and Easy (EZ) Food Market on Plymouth Avenue. A total of 32 different fraudulent credit cards were used to make periodic online property tax payments for the three properties between 2016 and 2022, totaling approximately $163,000. Further investigation determined that Lucky Beverage and Chili Express are owned by Mirza Khan, while Easy Food Market is owned by Khan’s father and co-defendant Talib Hussain.

    The complaint is the result of an investigation by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under the direction of Special Agent-in-Charge Matthew Miraglia, Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigation New York, under the direction of Harry Chavis, Acting Executive Special Agent in Charge, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service Boston Division, under the direction of Inspector in Charge Ketty Larco-Ward, and the Social Security Administration Office of Inspector General, under the direction of Acting Special Agent-in-Charge Amy Connelly.

    The fact that a defendant has been charged with a crime is merely an accusation and the defendant is presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty.

    # # # # 

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Tunisia: the government, the African Development Bank and several partners launch the CAP Emploi programme to boost the economy and create…

    Source: African Development Bank Group
    The CAP Emploi programme, a results-based financing initiative designed to transform Tunisia’s employment landscape, was officially launched on 26 February 2025 in Tunis at a high-level workshop attended by public and private sector stakeholders from the entrepreneurship ecosystem and the employment and vocational…

    MIL OSI Economics