Category: Energy

  • MIL-OSI: The Now Corporation (OTC: NWPN) Releases April 2025 Newsletter Showcasing EV Infrastructure Expansion and Vintage Fashion Revival

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    PASADENA, Calif., April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The Now Corporation (OTC: NWPN), a diversified holding company focused on sustainable innovation, is excited to announce the publication of its April 2025 newsletter. The latest edition highlights major advancements in electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure and the continued evolution of its vintage fashion subsidiary.

    The Now Corporate April 2025 Newsletter

    Major Highlights Include:

    EV Charging Project in Carson, CA

    Green Rain Energy, a subsidiary of The Now Corporation, has been selected to lead the development of a cutting-edge EV charging site at 23315 Main Street in Carson, California. Located within proximity to the Dignity Health Sports Park—one of the venues for the 2028 Olympic Games—this project aims to support increasing EV demand and regional sustainability efforts.

    The Now Corporation (OTC: NWPN) Through Its Subsidiary Green Rain Energy Announces New Details For Its EV Charging Project In Carson, CA

    Strategic Collaboration in Rochester, NY

    Green Rain Solar Inc. has also partnered with Chronical Electric and Rochester Gas and Electric (RG&E) to bring high-speed EV charging and battery storage solutions to Rochester, New York. This joint effort underscores The Now Corporation’s mission to advance clean, accessible energy infrastructure.

    The Now Corporation (OTC: NWPN) and Green Rain Solar Inc. Partner with Chronical Electric to Bring High-Speed EV Charging and Battery Storage to Rochester, NY

    Reviving American Heritage through M Love Vintage Holdings Inc.

    The newsletter also spotlights M Love Vintage Holdings Inc., the company’s fashion subsidiary, which is reviving iconic Americana through the timeless styles of Chuck’s Vintage. This effort marks a new era for the brand, celebrating its legacy while embracing a modern, luxurious approach to vintage wear.

    M Love Vintage Holdings Inc. Embarks on New Era of Luxury Vintage Fashion Under The Now Corporation

    About The Now Corporation:

    The Now Corporation is committed to acquiring and developing sustainable technologies across industries such as renewable energy, electric mobility, and advanced manufacturing. Through its subsidiaries, including Green Rain Solar Inc. and M Love Vintage Holdings Inc., the company strives to deliver impactful innovation.

    Stay updated and read the full newsletter at www.GreenRainEnergy.com

    Legal Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
    This press release contains forward-looking information within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. This material contains statements about expected future events and/or financial results that are forward- looking in nature and subject to risks and uncertainties. This includes the possibility that the business outlined in this press release may not be concluded due to unforeseen technical, installation, permitting, or other challenges. Such forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause the actual results, performance, or achievements of The Now Corporation to differ materially from those expressed herein. Except as required under U.S. federal securities laws, The Now Corporation undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

    Media Contact:

    Michael Cimino
    Email: Michael@pubcopr.com

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/8b05b4f3-6481-4eba-9c01-913089647d8e

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Windfarm Capable of Powering Half of Scotland’s Homes

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    News story

    Windfarm Capable of Powering Half of Scotland’s Homes

    Moray West offshore wind farm capable of powering half of Scotland’s homes is switched on by Scottish Secretary.

    The UK’s drive towards clean power, which is a huge jobs and economic opportunity for Scotland, took a significant step forward today [24 April] when Scottish Secretary Ian Murray switched on full power at Ocean Winds’ new Moray West offshore windfarm.

    The windfarm, located 13 miles off the coast of Buckie, is one of Scotland’s largest offshore windfarms. It will generate up to 882MW output – enough to power 1.3 million homes – half of Scotland’s households. Upon full power, Ocean Winds will become the largest offshore wind operator in Scotland, running two windfarms off the North East coast and with a third in development.

    Clean energy represents the economic opportunity of the 21st century, with this project alone creating around 1,500 jobs during the construction phase. The developer, Ocean Winds, has used more than 80 UK suppliers in the project to date, which has involved installing the biggest turbines yet in British waters, spanning up to 257m above sea level.  

    Speaking after his visit, Mr Murray said:

    “It was a huge moment today when I switched on full power for the Moray West Windfarm. 

    “Investment like that being made by Ocean Winds is absolutely central to ensuring that Scotland and its workers benefit from the skilled jobs and economic growth that clean energy can bring.

    “With Great British energy located in Aberdeen, and billions of pounds of investment on the table, Scotland is at the very heart of the UK Government’s drive to make the UK a clean energy superpower.”

    Moray West takes the UK Government a step closer to achieving the 43-50GW offshore wind targets set for 2030, as published in the Clean Power Action Plan- helping deliver on its mission to make the UK a clean energy superpower. 

    During his visit to Ocean Winds, Mr Murray met staff who have transitioned into renewables after careers in the oil and gas industry and the UK’s armed forces. 

    Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said:

    “Offshore wind is the backbone of our plans for clean power by 2030, as the UK is blessed with thousands of miles of coastline.

    “Developments like Moray West take us a step closer to getting off the fossil fuel rollercoaster and help deliver on our Plan for Change, protecting households from volatile gas prices and creating good jobs.”

    After switching on the windfarm to full power, Mr Murray travelled to Aberdeen.

    There he visited Sarens PSG and ETZ Ltd. 

    Sarens PSG were involved in the construction of the Moray West windfarm, marshalling 62 giant ‘monopiles’ – the wind turbine foundations. 10 metres in diameter and 84 metres long, the 2.000 tonne monopiles are the largest and heaviest ever to be handled in the United Kingdom. Mr Murray saw Sarens PSG’s new £1.6 million Aberdeen training facility for wind farm workers. The company opened the facility recently, saying that Great British Energy’s headquarters being located in Aberdeen made the city the ideal location for the facility⁠.

    Touring the Energy Transition Zone, Mr Murray visited the Floating Wind Innovation Centre, the UK’s first dedicated facility of its kind for floating wind technology, run by ORE Catapult.

    Also today [24 April 2025] Scotland Office Minister Kirsty McNeill visited the Port of Leith, located within the Forth Green Freeport, to mark the official opening of Forth Ports’ new Outer Berth. Forth Ports has invested a total of £100 million into transforming the Port of Leith into a world class renewables hub, which is already playing a key role in supporting Scotland’s energy transition. The Leith Renewables Hub is part of the Forth Green Freeport’s strategically located tax sites, which aim to reindustrialise central Scotland, generating thousands of high-quality green jobs by increasing trade and supporting the growth of businesses across the Firth of Forth.

    These visits are happening against the background of the UK Government co-hosting the International Energy Agency summit in London, a global event bringing together countries to discuss energy security.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: Ciscomani Reiterates Support for Medicaid at Arizona Chamber Event

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Juan Ciscomani (Arizona)

    Phoenix, AZ – U.S. Congressman Juan Ciscomani reaffirmed his unwavering commitment to preserving Medicaid benefits for those who rely on it, like single mothers, the working poor, individuals with disabilities, and the elderly. 

    “We’ve got to make sure that we protect Medicaid for people the program was intended to serve,” said Ciscomani at the Arizona Chamber of Commerce’s annual Update from Capitol Hill Lunch. 

    Earlier this month, Ciscomani and twelve Republican colleagues sent a letter to House Republican Leadership and Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Brett Guthrie reiterating their support on Medicaid and making clear the lawmakers would not vote for legislation that reduces Medicaid coverage for vulnerable populations.  
    The Congressman also told the audience that there is no question that the federal government can, and must, do more to reduce waste and safeguard the long-term financial viability of Medicaid. You can watch Ciscomani’s remarks here

    “As the federal government has grown, so have inefficiencies and unnecessary bureaucracies,” said Ciscomani. “I have been crystal clear that I do not support reducing Medicaid coverage for those the program was intended to serve. What I do support are targeted reforms, such as implementing work requirements for able-bodied adults with no dependents and strengthening eligibility verification to ensure that every dollar is maximized and spent on vulnerable individuals who rely on Medicaid.” 

    The Congressman also told audiences that while we have made great strides to secure the southern border, Mexican drug cartels are regrouping as border security has ramped up under the Trump administration.  

    “The threat is still real, Mexican drug cartels aren’t going to surrender their multi-billion dollar businesses easily,” he said. “The fight is not over and there is still a lot of work that needs to be done to codify the administration’s border security efforts into law.” 

    In March, Ciscomani, who serves as Vice Chair of the House Appropriations Homeland Security Subcommittee, hosted nine freshman Republican lawmakers on a tour of the Arizona – Mexico border. Here, they learned about the cartel’s effort to use unmanned aerial drones to carry out their illicit operations and threaten our national security. As a result, Ciscomani and Rep. John McGuire (VA-05) penned a letter to Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, and Federal Aviation Administrator Chris Rocheleau about countering drones at the southern border. You can watch NewsNation’s coverage here

    ### 

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: BYDFi Launches DOLO/USDT and INIT/USDT with a $10,000 Prize Pool

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    VICTORIA, Seychelles, April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The global crypto exchange BYDFi announced the official listing of Dolomite and Initia tokens, now available for spot trading under the pairs DOLO/USDT and INIT/USDT. To celebrate the launch, BYDFi has introduced a $10,000 prize pool, giving all participants the opportunity to earn rewards by trading.

    $DOLO: A Core Asset in the Berachain Ecosystem

    $DOLO is the native token of the Dolomite protocol, serving key functions in governance, liquidity incentives, and risk hedging. Dolomite is a decentralized finance (DeFi) platform built on Berachain that integrates a DEX module, enabling users to stake, lend, vote, and earn yield — all while maintaining full control of their assets, even when borrowing.

    Since its inception in 2018, Dolomite has become one of Berachain’s leading lending protocols, known for its virtual liquidity model, multi-layered reward system, and cross-protocol compatibility. Its co-founder, Corey Caplan, now serves as the Head of Technical Strategy for the Trump-affiliated DeFi initiative World Liberty Financial (WLFI), helping evolve Dolomite’s technical framework. The project has raised over $3.4 million from prominent investors, including Coinbase Ventures, NGC Ventures, and Polygon.

    $INIT: A Modular Layer 1 Built for the Future

    Initia ($INIT) is a modular Layer 1 blockchain powered by the Omnitia Consensus mechanism and built using the Initia Interwoven Stack. It is designed to overcome scalability limitations in traditional blockchains and enable seamless cross-chain interoperability and resource sharing. With innovations like Gas Abstraction and a dual-deflationary token model, Initia enhances overall performance and security while significantly lowering the user barrier to cross-chain operations.

    With innovations like Gas Abstraction and a dual-layer deflationary mechanism, INIT enhances performance, security, and cross-chain interoperability. Backed by leading VCs like Delphi Digital, Hack VC, and Theory Ventures, Initia has attracted over 5,000 developers, with a project valuation of $250 million.

    Multiple Rewards Now Live on BYDFi

    Starting today, users who trade DOLO/USDT and INIT/USDT on the BYDFi platform will not only have a chance to share in the $10,000 prize pool, but can also participate in the following limited-time bonus campaigns:

    More details are available on BYDFi’s official platform.

    About BYDFi

    Founded in 2020, BYDFi has been recognized by Forbes as one of the Top 10 Global Crypto Exchanges and is officially listed on CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko. Serving users in 190+ countries, the platform is trusted by over 1,000,000 users worldwide.

    As an official sponsor of Token2049 in Dubai, BYDFi welcomes users and partners from around the world to connect in person and discuss the future of Web3. BYDFi is committed to delivering a world-class crypto trading experience for every user. BUIDL Your Dream Finance.

    • Website: https://www.bydfi.com
    • Support Email: cs@bydfi.com
    • Business Partnerships: bd@bydfi.com
    • Media Inquiries: media@bydfi.com

    Twitter( X )| LinkedIn| Facebook | Telegram| YouTube

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Jane Fonda stands with Greenpeace to defend the oceans at United Nations global oceans talks

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    Jane Fonda talks with reporters in the Millennium Hotel outside the United Nations on the United States no-show at major multilateral negotiations to protect the environment. This comes amidst the ongoing lawsuit against Greenpeace US. © Stephanie Keiith / Greenpeace

    New York, United States, 24 April 2025 – Actor and activist Jane Fonda joined Greenpeace’s delegation to the United Nations for a crucial Global Ocean Treaty meeting yesterday. She delivered a rousing address to country delegates, thanking them for their work to protect the global oceans. 

    Agreement on the Global Ocean Treaty is one of the few multilateral processes on protecting nature that has made significant progress in recent years. This progress has continued at the United Nations in recent weeks, despite the United States not sending a delegation for the first time. 

    Jane Fonda said in her address to delegates at the United Nations: “The Global Ocean Treaty is a beacon of hope in these turbulent times. It shows that when we focus on our common humanity and our dependence on a healthy planet, we can push back against the tide of extraction and corporate greed.”

    Delegates have made strong progress in the last two weeks on setting up the first Ocean Conference of Parties (COP), which will be the UN body that brings the Global Ocean Treaty to life at sea. [1]

    In a separate press event, outside the UN, Jane Fonda also highlighted attempts by the current US administration to undermine multilateralism from outside the United Nations: “Hope for the future of our planet is still possible even as President Trump is trying to tear down multilateralism, undermine international processes to protect nature and stop environmental groups like Greenpeace from working to protect our planet.”

    “Trump’s administration is trying to silence this movement — and the truth. They know protest works — that’s why they’re trying to make the stakes so high no one will be willing to take the risk. That’s why Greenpeace in the US and Greenpeace International have been sued by Big Oil company Energy Transfer for hundreds of millions of dollars.” [2]

    Arlo Hemphill, Greenpeace USA’s Oceans Are Life campaign lead, said: “While the Trump Administration has retreated from global efforts to protect life on our planet, such as the climate COP, and has waged a desperately short-sighted war on the environment that only benefits a few billionaires, these two weeks have been a glimmer of hope. Other nations have risen to the occasion, demonstrating the leadership needed to ensure we’re making significant headway on protecting our oceans. There is still much to accomplish to bring the Treaty into effect, and we encourage these countries to maintain their momentum towards building something that will last long beyond the turmoil of this moment, beyond a single administration, something that will last for generations. We must use this Treaty to protect at least 30% of the world’s oceans by 2030, and to keep this target alive, governments must ratify it as soon as possible in 2025.”

    The Trump administration recently issued an Executive Order that opens vast swaths of protected ocean to commercial exploitation, including areas within the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument. It allows commercial fishing in areas long considered off-limits due to their ecological significance—despite overwhelming scientific consensus that marine sanctuaries are essential for rebuilding fish stocks and maintaining ocean health. These actions threaten some of the most sensitive and pristine marine ecosystems in the world.

    Greenpeace USA activists displayed a vast banner earlier this week, outside the United Nations headquarters, reading “Protect the Oceans.” The team also wore t-shirts with the message “We Will Not Be Silenced,” reiterating the organization’s commitment to continue advocating for environmental protection in the wake of the recent $660M jury verdict against Greenpeace entities in a lawsuit brought by pipeline company Energy Transfer.

    Photos and videos are available in the Greenpeace Media Library.


    Notes

    -Full transcripts of Jane Fonda’s speeches are available on request.

    -Jane Fonda is a longtime Greenpeace supporter. She was at the UN during the final negotiations on the global Ocean treaty in February 2023 to meet with delegates and hand over more than 5.5 million signatures petition to the President of the negotiations Rena Lee  

    [1] The Global Ocean Treaty will only enter into force 120 days after 60 countries have ratified. The UN Secretary-General is required to convene the first meeting of the ocean COP to the Agreement no later than one year after its entry into force.

    [2] https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/energy-transfer-lawsuit-verdict/ 

    Contacts in New York:

    Other contacts:

    • Greenpeace International Press Desk: [email protected] +31 (0) 20 718 2470 (available 24 hours)
    • Tanya Brooks, Senior Communications Specialist at Greenpeace USA, [email protected]  

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Major carbon capture project to deliver jobs and growth

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Press release

    Major carbon capture project to deliver jobs and growth

    Thousands of jobs created as major carbon capture and storage network is ready for construction – boosting energy security and the government’s Plan for Change.

    • Plan for Change delivers 2,000 skilled jobs to build major carbon capture network driving growth and reducing emissions in industrial heartlands
    • clean energy to be hardwired into national planning rules to attract investment, give certainty and boost mission to become a clean energy superpower
    • comes as UK-led Global Clean Power Alliance announces its next mission to diversify clean energy supply chains by unblocking bottlenecks and boosting global manufacturing capacity

    British families and businesses will be more energy secure as a major carbon capture and storage network is now ready for construction – supporting 2,000 jobs through the Plan for Change. 

    Launching this new industry for Britain provides a major boost for heavy industry – part of the government’s commitment to backing British manufacturing.

    Energy company Eni have today (24 April 2025) finalised a major deal with government which will see them award around £2 billion in supply chain contracts for their Liverpool Bay Carbon Capture and Storage Project, spanning North Wales and the North West of England. 

    Today’s deal delivers on a commitment made by the Prime Minister and Energy Secretary in October, to develop a world leading carbon capture industry – backed by £21.7 billion – reigniting industrial heartlands across the country and kickstarting growth in manufacturing communities. 

    This announcement comes as the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) awards three carbon storage permits to Eni for its Liverpool Bay CCS project.

    It will create a network of clean infrastructure, decarbonising industries like energy from waste, hydrogen and cement production – whilst backing highly skilled jobs in construction and enabling future generation of low carbon power.  

    Alongside this, the government has set out further planning reforms to provide certainty and clarity for developers on the importance of clean power projects, such as solar, onshore and offshore wind and nuclear, when making decisions on energy infrastructure of critical national priority. 

    Previously where policy, legislation and guidance left room for doubt, planners and decision-takers have adopted a cautious approach to consenting clean energy infrastructure, leading to lengthy paperwork and red tape blocking decisions, hindering Britain’s energy security. 

    Changes will streamline the planning system and get Britain building by giving developers clarity on what is needed for their clean power project to succeed. By putting clean power by 2030 at the heart of planning policy, the government is backing industry, removing delays and getting clean energy projects built quicker.

    Prime Minister Keir Starmer said: 

    Our Plan for Change is working – we said we’d deliver jobs and growth through carbon capture technology, and now we have. Shovels ready for the ground, supporting over 2,000 new jobs and supporting thousands more, transforming the lives of hard-working people.

    Energy Secretary Ed Miliband said:  

    Today we keep our promise to launch a whole new clean energy industry for our country – carbon capture and storage – to deliver thousands of highly skilled jobs and revitalise our industrial communities. 

    We are making the UK energy secure and backing our engineers, electricians and welders so we can protect families and businesses and drive jobs through our Plan for Change.

    Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, said:

    We promised to revitalise our nation’s industrial heartlands, create good jobs, make Britain a clean energy superpower and grow our economy to put more money in working people’s pockets.

    This deal is another example of us delivering on those promises with thousands of new jobs created, our energy security strengthened, and our industries decarbonised with a game-changing technology – our Plan for Change in action.

    Eni CEO Claudio Descalzi said:  

    The strategic agreement with the UK government paves the way for the industrial-scale development of CCS, a sector in which the United Kingdom reaffirms its leadership thanks to the promotion of a regulatory framework that aims to strengthen the development of CCS and make it fully competitive in the market.  

    Eni has established itself as a leading operator in the UK thanks to its key role in CO2 transport and storage activities as the leader of the HyNet Consortium, which will become one of the first low-carbon clusters in the world. 

    Stuart Payne, Chief Executive of the North Sea Transition Authority, said:  

    We have taken another major step on the way to turning this country’s ambitions for carbon storage into reality. It’s been a collaborative mission and demonstrates the way that we must all work together in unlocking the UK’s vast potential to tackle climate change and deliver energy security.

    The Prime Minister confirmed the deal today in a speech at the Future of Energy Security Summit – hosted by the UK government and International Energy Agency. Ministers and business leaders from around the world gathered in London, including the President of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen, as countries take action to protect themselves from future energy shocks in these unstable times.

    At the summit the government also established a new mission focused on strengthening global supply chains through the UK-led Global Clean Power Alliance (GCPA). The GCPA will bring together the Global North and South – drawing on and sharing the UK’s world-leading experience of pursuing Clean Power by 2030 to speed up the global clean energy transition.  

    Foreign Secretary David Lammy said:

    This week’s Summit is a critical opportunity to make progress on international energy security.

    We’re working with partners through our Global Clean Power Alliance (GCPA) to accelerate global clean energy, which promises to bring growth, jobs and lower bills to the UK. As the Prime Minister has set out today, the GCPA will next focus on assuring reliable, low-cost clean energy supply chains. In a more uncertain world, cooperation across the Global North and South will be essential to deliver this.

    The supply chain mission will bring countries together to diversify clean energy supply chains, drive investment into renewables and address bottlenecks. Working with other countries will not only help to secure and diversify clean energy of the future, but provide new growth opportunities across our countries and relevant supply chains; from critical mineral processing to strengthening manufacturing and industrial partnerships.
     
    The rapid drop in the price of renewables is driving strong growth in clean energy around the world. In 2024, 80% of growth in global electricity generation was provided by renewables and nuclear. The UK alone has already attracted £43.7 billion of private sector investment announcements in clean energy since July. 

    Notes to editors 

    CCUS is a proven technology that captures carbon dioxide emissions before they reach the atmosphere – storing them safely and permanently deep beneath the seabed and preventing their contribution to the climate crisis. 

    Today’s announcement delivers on the commitment made by the Prime Minster in October where £21.7 billion was allocated to kickstart the UK’s carbon capture industry. The signing of contracts for Hynet means the UK’s second carbon capture network is now shovel ready. 

    The Climate Change Committee describes CCUS as a “necessity, not an option” to achieving net zero by 2050. 

    Eni is the operator of the Transport and Storage network of Hynet, through its Liverpool Bay CCS project, which will transport captured CO2 from industrial sites and bury it deep beneath the seabed.  

    It means that now both government-backed carbon capture projects have reached final investment decisions, after the East Coast Cluster in Teesside reached the same milestone in December.  

    The consultations on the National Policy Statements for energy will run from 24 April to 29 May.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI: SUNation Energy Restructures $5.5 Million of Long-Term Debt, Improving Cash Flows and Enhancing Liquidity

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    RONKONKOMA, N.Y., April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — SUNation Energy, Inc. (Nasdaq: SUNE), a leading provider of sustainable solar energy and backup power solutions for households, businesses, and municipalities, today announced that it has amended the terms of a $5,486,000 Long Term Promissory Note (the “Note”) associated with the Company’s second acquisition dating from November 2022.

    Under the new terms of the Long-Term Note, as disclosed in our recent annual report on Form 10-K, the principal amount of the Note, previously due and payable as a one-time payment due in November 2025, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, has been extended and is to now due and payable in 36 monthly installments beginning in June 2025 through May 1, 2028.

    “The restructuring of this Note is the latest in a series of restructuring and debt reduction initiatives designed to incrementally improve the Company’s capital structure, enhance cash flows, and provide the necessary flexibility to allow us to execute our long-term growth objectives,” said James Brennan, Chief Financial Officer. “We appreciate the efforts of our independent board members in helping to reach these new terms with the Note holders, as well as for their confidence in the Company’s long term growth prospects.”

    In addition, under the terms of a newly created Senior Secured Contingent Note Instrument (the “Contingent Note”), payment of the unearned 2024 earnout has been rescheduled. In addition to certain other conditions set forth therein, it will now follow the earnout terms in the Contingent Note covering the 2024 and 2025 fiscal years. If 2025’s EBITDA is greater than that of 2024, then the earnout will have been earned, and it will be paid over a period of 24 months starting in 2026.

    “One of our focus points has, and will continue to be, ensuring that our commitments are honored and any of our outstanding obligations are satisfied,” said Scott Maskin, Chief Executive Officer. “Commencing repayment of this Note is a significant step towards that goal. We are creating an environment where SUNation’s value can be based on its business performance, rather than exclusively by its previously costly and challenging capital structure.”

    Copies of the amended and restated secured Long-Term Note and the Senior Secured Contingent Note Instrument, along with the accompanying Security Agreement, can be found as annexed exhibits to the Company’s most recent annual report on Form 10-K.

    About SUNation Energy, Inc.

    SUNation Energy, Inc. is focused on growing leading local and regional solar, storage, and energy services companies nationwide. Our vision is to power the energy transition through grass-roots growth of solar electricity paired with battery storage. Our portfolio of brands (SUNation, Hawaii Energy Connection, E-Gear) provide homeowners and businesses of all sizes with an end-to-end product offering spanning solar, battery storage, and grid services. SUNation Energy, Inc.’s largest markets include New York, Florida, and Hawaii, and the company operates in three (3) states.

    Forward Looking Statements 

    This press release includes certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on the Company’s current expectations or beliefs and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. While the Company believes its plans, intentions, and expectations reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, these plans, intentions, or expectations may not be achieved. For information about the factors that could cause such differences, please refer to the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including, without limitation, the statements made under the heading “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 and in subsequent filings. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements for any reason, except as required by law.

    Safe Harbor Statement

    Our prospects here at SUNation Energy Inc. are subject to uncertainties and risks. This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934, including, but not limited to, the risk that SUNation may not be able to enter into definitive agreements to commence these solar installations, and that the projects being contemplated will not generate the expected levels of energy or deliver the anticipated financial benefits. The Company intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbor provided by the foregoing Sections. These forward-looking statements are based largely on the expectations or forecasts of future events, can be affected by inaccurate assumptions, and are subject to various business risks and known and unknown uncertainties, a number of which are beyond the control of management. Therefore, actual results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation. The Company cannot predict or determine after the fact what factors would cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements or other statements. The reader should consider statements that include the words “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “estimates”, “plans”, “projects”, “should”, or other expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events or trends, to be uncertain and forward-looking. We caution readers not to place undue reliance upon any such forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise. Additional information respecting factors that could materially affect the Company and its operations are contained in the Company’s filings with the SEC which can be found on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

    Contacts:
    Scott Maskin
    Chief Executive Officer
    +1 (631) 823-7131
    smaskin@sunation.com

    SUNation Energy Investor Relations
    +1 (212) 836-9600
    IR@sunation.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Adeeb Y. Al Aama Appointed as Chief Executive Officer of the International Islamic Trade Finance Corporation

    Source: Africa Press Organisation – English (2) – Report:

    JEDDAH, Saudi Arabia, April 24, 2025/APO Group/ —

    The International Islamic Trade Finance Corporation (ITFC) (www.ITFC-IDB.org), the trade finance arm of the Islamic Development Bank (IsDB) Group, is pleased to announce the appointment of Engineer Adeeb Y. Al Aama as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) ITFC, effective April 20, 2025.   

    The appointment was approved by the ITFC Board of Directors, following the recommendation of H.E. Dr. Muhammad Al Jasser, Chairman of the ITFC Board and President of the IsDB Group. 

    Upon his appointment, Eng. Al Aama stated: “It is a great honor to assume leadership of ITFC as we embark on the next chapter of our growth journey. Building on the solid foundations laid over the years, I am committed to advancing ITFC’s mission of empowering our member countries through innovative trade financing and development solutions. Together with the dedication of our talented team and the steadfast support of our partners, I am confident that we will drive greater impact, foster strategic partnerships, and contribute to sustainable and inclusive economic growth across our member countries.” 

    Eng. Al Aama brings over three decades of leadership experience spanning international organizations, multinational corporations and government institutions. He has extensive experience in international trade, energy markets, strategic planning, and economics among others. His distinguished career includes serving as Saudi Arabia’s Governor for OPEC and Deputy Minister of Energy for Kingdom Affairs in OPEC and Global Oil Markets, where he played a pivotal role in shaping energy policies and strengthening economic cooperation. 

    Throughout his distinguished career, he has advised three Saudi Energy Ministers and held executive roles at Saudi Aramco and Saudi Petroleum Overseas Ltd., driving international trade partnerships and strategic initiatives. 

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Global: Alaska, rich in petroleum, faces an energy shortage

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Brett Watson, Assistant Professor of Applied and Natural Resource Economics, University of Alaska Anchorage

    The Trans-Alaska Pipeline crosses underneath the Dalton Highway, carrying crude oil from the North Slope to a port in Valdez. Lance King/Getty Images

    In the state with the fourth-largest proven reserves of oil and gas in the U.S., there is a looming energy shortage.

    Above the Arctic Circle, oil producers on Alaska’s North Slope send an average of 465,000 barrels of crude oil south each day for shipping to refineries and users around the country and the world.

    But in south-central Alaska – Anchorage and the surrounding region, home to 63% of the state’s population – utility companies are warning they may not have enough natural gas from current sources to keep the power and heat on without interruption.

    As a professor at the University of Alaska Anchorage who studies the economics of natural resources, I can see this apparent contradiction has a straightforward cause but no simple solution.

    Oil facilities in Prudhoe Bay on the North Slope, photographed March 28, 2002.
    Simon Bruty/Anychance/Getty Images

    Declining oil production

    The North Slope region once produced nearly 2 million barrels of oil per day at its peak in the 1980s. Every barrel is transported via the 800-mile Trans-Alaska Pipeline System to the port of Valdez, where it is loaded onto tanker ships.

    The state government collects significant taxes and royalties on oil production. For decades, oil revenue allowed the state to fund all government spending without imposing broad-based income, sales or property taxes. At the height of the oil boom, there was so much money that Alaska established a wealth fund, now valued at over US$80 billion, and began distributing dividends to every resident.

    But the Trans-Alaska Pipeline is designed to carry oil, not natural gas. A state law prevents producers from burning off excess gas, or flaring, as happens in many fields. With nowhere to send it, gas extracted from Alaska’s oil fields is reinjected into the ground to boost well pressure and push more oil out.

    Significant natural gas potential

    Alaska’s gas reserves are significant. State estimates suggest the North Slope has about 35 trillion cubic feet of proven reserves. That’s almost as much natural gas as the U.S. as a whole produced in 2023.

    But that is just the beginning: The North Slope also has the potential for another 200 trillion cubic feet that remains undiscovered. And improving technologies and techniques may be able to extract another 590 trillion cubic feet, according to the Alaska Gasline Development Corp., a company owned by the state of Alaska that is trying develop a project to extract and sell the state’s natural gas.

    As oil production declines and prices remain uncertain, selling gas could provide a different stream of revenue for the state, potentially providing billions of dollars.

    The 800-mile problem

    For decades, there have been numerous proposals to develop Alaska’s gas. State agencies and the petroleum industry have collectively spent hundreds of millions of dollars on this effort.

    The concept that’s closest to reality is Alaska Gasline Development Corp.’s proposal to build a plant on the North Slope to remove gas impurities, a liquefaction plant near Anchorage that could export 20 million tons of liquefied gas each year – around a trillion cubic feet – and an 807-mile pipeline to connect the two.

    The cost is expected to be significant: The corporation’s own estimate is that it would cost $44 billion. But that number was developed before the construction sector saw significant inflation in 2022. An engineering study due for release in late 2025 will provide a more updated figure. Alaskans remember that the Trans-Alaska Pipeline ended up costing 25% more than projected.

    Since his first day in office, President Donald Trump has touted this pipeline as part of efforts to expand the nation’s production of fossil fuels. He told a joint session of Congress it was a near-ready project, with Japan and South Korea ready to invest “trillions of dollars each.” In February 2025, he stood alongside Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba to announce a “joint venture” to develop the pipeline project, but no specific details have been announced.

    Winter in Alaska means deep cold and lots of snow.
    AP Photo/Mark Thiessen

    2 expensive options

    There is a growing need to address Alaska’s domestic energy shortfall.

    South-central Alaska relies on natural gas for more than 70% of its electric and heating needs. But the gas reserves closest to Anchorage, in the Cook Inlet, which have provided energy to the area since the 1960s, are dwindling, and prices are rising. In 2005, wholesale gas prices were $3.75 per 1,000 cubic feet of natural gas. By 2024, the price had more than doubled, to $8.75. By contrast, the rest of the U.S. has seen natural gas prices cut in half over that period, thanks in part to horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking.

    In 2022, Hilcorp, the company responsible for roughly 85% of the Cook Inlet gas production, reported that by 2027 it might not be able to supply enough gas for utilities that serve the region.

    Solutions other than the pipeline are also slow and expensive. Local utilities estimate that improving energy efficiency and developing renewable power could reduce gas demand by around 10% over the next several years and by as much as 15% after a decade. But retrofitting the area’s aging and energy-inefficient homes will not be fast or cheap.

    More than just economics

    What remains for Alaska are two main options: get gas from the North Slope to Anchorage, or import liquefied gas from the global market.

    Building the pipeline could both meet the needs of Alaska’s people and bring in money from global sales – though how much revenue depends on how global gas markets change over time and how competitive Alaska gas prices would be relative to other suppliers.

    Any delays from financial, legal, technical or environmental challenges would balloon costs. But if it succeeded, Anchorage-area customers could see prices drop as low as $2.23 per 1,000 cubic feet – a 75% drop from current prices and 40% lower than in 2005. The savings could significantly bolster the region’s economy.

    Importing is a costly option. A study commissioned by the Alaska Legislature found that imported gas would cost $13.72 per 1,000 cubic feet. That’s 60% more than current prices and especially burdensome for Alaska families and businesses, which already pay far higher energy bills than typical American customers.

    Beyond the economic questions, there’s something symbolic at stake: the state’s identity. Could a state synonymous with energy production become an energy importer? Many Alaskans see the prospect as an embarrassing paradox – akin to Hawaii importing pineapples or New Mexico importing green chiles.

    Independence and globalization

    Alaska is not alone in grappling with the tension between energy self-sufficiency and economic efficiency.

    Across the U.S., states rich in resources have wrestled with the question of whether to prioritize local production or integrate into global markets. Texas produces more oil than any other state, yet it continues to import crude oil due to mismatches between its production and refining capacity.

    Shaped by globalization, few regions can truly isolate themselves from market forces. Energy production and consumption are increasingly interconnected, meaning pursuit of local self-sufficiency comes at a steep economic cost. That’s the question facing Alaska: whether to invest in domestic infrastructure to maintain energy independence, or embrace the flexibility – and potentially lower cost – of global markets.

    Brett Watson receives funding from First National Bank Alaska to conduct research on the Alaska economy, including energy issues. He has previously received funding from Power the Future for work on Alaska mineral issues.

    ref. Alaska, rich in petroleum, faces an energy shortage – https://theconversation.com/alaska-rich-in-petroleum-faces-an-energy-shortage-254903

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI USA: The United States operates the world’s largest nuclear power plant fleet

    Source: US Energy Information Administration

    In-brief analysis

    April 24, 2025


    In 2024, U.S. utilities operated 94 nuclear reactors with a total net generating capacity of nearly 97 gigawatts (GW), the largest commercial nuclear power generation fleet in the world. The next three countries with the largest programs were France with 57 units (63.0 GW), China with 57 units (55.3 GW), and Russia with 36 units (28.6 GW). Nuclear power continues to account for 19% of U.S. power sector electricity generation.

    America’s nuclear reactor fleet consists of 54 power plants, each of which has one to four operating units. Plant Vogtle in Georgia is the largest nuclear power plant with four reactors and a total generating capacity of around 4.5 GW. The R.E. Ginna plant in New York is the smallest nuclear power plant with its one 0.6-GW reactor.

    After Georgia Power added one reactor in 2023 and another in 2024, Plant Vogtle became the largest U.S. nuclear power plant, with Units 3 and 4 each having a generating capacity of 1.1 GW. Before the recent addition of the reactors at Vogtle, the Palo Verde plant (3.9 GW) in Arizona was the largest nuclear facility in the United States. The two reactors at Vogtle and one reactor at Watts Bar in Tennessee are the only new nuclear reactors to come online in the United States since 1996.

    Twelve U.S. nuclear power reactors have permanently closed since 2013. However, plant operators have maintained consistently high annual capacity factors, which measure how much time units are operating. U.S. nuclear capacity factors have increased in part because of shorter refueling and maintenance outages and improved operational experience.


    Some newer policies aim to support continued operations at nuclear power plants. In January 2024, the U.S. Department of Energy provided credits to support the continued operation of the Diablo Canyon Power Plant in California. In 2024, the electricity produced at Diablo Canyon (2.2 GW) accounted for 9% of California’s total electricity generation. More recently, the U.S. Department of Energy approved a loan to support restarting the Palisades nuclear power plant in Michigan. If realized, Palisades would become the first previously retired nuclear power plant in the United States to return to operating status.

    Our Electric Power Monthly and Electric Power Annual products compile data from multiple electricity surveys of nuclear power and other electricity generation sources in the United States. Our Hourly Electric Grid Monitor provides near real-time information on the operating status of the grid in the Lower 48 states, and our Status of U.S. Nuclear Outages dashboard compiles daily information on nuclear plants’ operating status based on data reported to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Our Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory compiles detailed information on attributes of operating, planned, and retired utility-scale generators.

    Principal contributor: Slade Johnson

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI: Quino Energy and Long Hill Energy Partners Awarded $10M in California Energy Commission Grant Funding to Demonstrate an 8 MWh Organic Flow Battery System

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SAN LEANDRO, Calif., April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Quino Energy, a company developing water-based flow batteries, and Long Hill Energy Partners, a California-based clean energy developer, have been awarded $10M in grant funding through the California Energy Commission (CEC) Energy Research and Development Division’s Electric Program Investment Charge Program (EPIC). The funding will support a proposed 8 MWh flow battery energy storage project at the High Desert Regional Health Center (HDRHC) in Lancaster, CA.

    This project will be the first U.S. commercial deployment of Quino Energy’s proprietary organic flow battery technology and will demonstrate its viability in large-scale, long-duration storage in an application serving critical infrastructure. It falls within Project Group 2, which focuses on funding multiple use-case demonstrations for energy storage value stacking.

    Quino Energy and Long Hill Energy Partners will jointly develop this proposed project, with Quino leading technology development, integration, and testing and Long Hill serving as lead for project development, permitting and program management and reporting. The demonstration will be conducted in partnership with Los Angeles County, where the site is located, and the Clean Coalition Group, a community-based non-profit specializing in the development and testing of clean energy microgrids.

    Once operational, Quino Energy’s organic flow battery is expected to provide critical energy resiliency and back-up power capacity for up to 100% of HDRHC’s energy demand during peak and off-peak hours while maximizing safety due to the system’s completely non-flammable nature. Additionally, Quino’s flow battery will enable the HDRHC to save over $10 million in electricity costs over the flow battery’s estimated 20-year operating life. Further, the installation of an on-site flow battery will allow Los Angeles County to expand an existing solar carport installed at this site, dramatically increasing the percentage of clean and renewable solar power generated and consumed by the HDRHC and further reducing electricity costs.

    “Quino Energy is grateful to the CEC for its support to demonstrate the potential of scalable, reliable organic flow batteries in our home state of California,” said Eugene Beh, CEO of Quino Energy. “Our technology started as an invention at a lab at Harvard and has rapidly grown in scale by leveraging mature flow battery systems that have been proven over decades with vanadium electrolyte. Our low-cost, non-flammable, and Made in USA organic electrolyte in place of vanadium will allow flow batteries to dramatically come down in cost to be a serious alternative to lithium-ion batteries. We are very excited to work with Long Hill Energy Partners, Los Angeles County, the High Desert Regional Health Center, and the Clean Coalition to showcase our technology in a real-world setting.”

    “Long Hill is excited to partner with the CEC to scale-up and demonstrate Quino Energy’s innovative flow battery solution for LA County’s High Desert Regional Health Center,” said Ed Chiao, Managing Director of Long Hill Energy Partners. “The Clean Coalition Group, a Southern California-based non-profit energy consultancy, will lead community engagement and provide expertise in Microgrid design and implementation. Once installed, the flow battery will provide critical energy resiliency and is also projected to save up to $10 million in energy costs for LA County’s hospital.”

    “We are very pleased that Quino Energy and Long Hill Energy Partners have been awarded $10 million by the CEC,” added Masahiro Sameshima, General Partner at ANRI, a venture capital firm based in Tokyo and one of Quino Energy’s investors. “We believe this recognition reflects the high evaluation of their innovative flow battery technology and its great potential. We look forward to seeing them accelerate their R&D with this funding and contribute to the realization of a decarbonized society.”

    Project permitting is anticipated to begin in Q3 2025; the project is expected to break ground in the Fall of 2026, with the flow battery system coming online in early 2027.

    Quino Energy has previously received funding through the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)’s Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Office (AMMTO) to support the development of its flow battery material production line as well as to demonstrate their innovative aqueous organic quinone redox flow battery (QRFB) technology in carbon steel tanks.

    About Quino Energy

    Formed in 2021, Quino Energy is a start-up company that is developing water-based flow batteries that store electrical energy in organic molecules called quinones, for commercial and grid applications. These batteries are predicted to enjoy a unique combination of low capital cost, true fire safety, rapid scalability, and local manufacturability. This is made possible by a number of technological breakthroughs, some of which were first discovered at Harvard University and later licensed by Quino Energy. Please visit quinoenergy.com for more details on the team and the technology.

    About Long Hill Energy Partners

    Long Hill Energy Partners is an energy development company which specializes in supporting the scale-up and commercialization of emerging clean energy technologies. Long Hill partners with innovative venture-stage companies to develop and demonstrate their technology at scale, proving out economic returns for real-world applications.

    Media inquiries:
    quino@fischtankpr.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Smackover Lithium’s South West Arkansas Project Receives Unanimous Vote of Approval to Establish the Phase I Brine Production Unit from the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LEWISVILLE, Ark., April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Smackover Lithium, a Joint Venture (“JV”) between Standard Lithium Ltd. (“Standard Lithium” or the “Company”) (TSXV:SLI) (NYSE:A:SLI) and Equinor, is pleased to announce that the brine production unit, now formally named the Reynolds Unit, for Phase I of its South West Arkansas (“SWA”) Project has been unanimously approved by the Arkansas Oil and Gas Commission (“AOGC”) with no objections or opposition in a hearing that was open to all stakeholders from the community.

    “We thank the AOGC for their due diligence in reviewing our application and for their swift approval,” said Standard Lithium’s President and COO, Dr. Andy Robinson, who provided testimony at the hearing. “The establishment of the Reynolds brine unit is another key milestone our team has now successfully completed as we march towards a final investment decision for the SWA Project, and also a necessary statutory requirement as we look to set a royalty for the unit in late May.”

    “Gaining regulatory approval for our first brine unit is an important step in our project timeline. We look forward to working with the AOGC and community stakeholders to establish a competitive royalty rate for this unit and continue momentum with the SWA Project,” said Allison Kennedy Thurmond, VP of US Lithium at Equinor.

    The Reynolds unit is 20,854 acres in size and is planned to produce 22,500 tonnes per year of battery-quality lithium carbonate once in full commercial production, expected in 2028. For more information about the SWA Project and Smackover Lithium, please visit www.smackoverlithium.com

    About Standard Lithium Ltd.

    Standard Lithium is a leading near-commercial lithium development company focused on the sustainable development of a portfolio of large, high-grade lithium-brine properties in the United States. The Company prioritizes projects characterized by the highest quality resources, robust infrastructure, skilled labor, and streamlined permitting. Standard Lithium aims to achieve sustainable, commercial-scale lithium production via the application of a scalable and fully integrated Direct Lithium Extraction (“DLE”) and purification process. The Company’s flagship projects are located in the Smackover Formation, a world-class lithium brine asset, focused in Arkansas and Texas. In partnership with global energy leader Equinor, Standard Lithium is advancing the South West Arkansas project, a greenfield project located in southern Arkansas, and actively exploring promising lithium brine prospects in East Texas. Standard Lithium also holds an interest in certain mineral leases in the Mojave Desert in San Bernardino County, California.

    Standard Lithium trades on both the TSX Venture Exchange and the NYSE American under the symbol “SLI”. Please visit the Company’s website at www.standardlithium.com.

    About Equinor

    Equinor is an international energy company committed to long-term value creation in a low-carbon future. Equinor’s portfolio of projects encompasses oil and gas, renewables and low-carbon solutions, with an ambition of becoming a net-zero energy company by 2050. Headquartered in Norway, Equinor is the leading operator on the Norwegian continental shelf and is present in around 30 countries worldwide. Our partnership with Standard Lithium to mature DLE projects builds on our broad US energy portfolio of oil and gas, offshore wind, low carbon solutions and battery storage projects.

    For more information on Equinor in the US, please visit: Equinor in the US – Equinor

    Investor and Media Inquiries

    Chris Lang
    Standard Lithium Ltd.
    +1 604 409 8154
    investors@standardlithium.com

    Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release. This news release may contain certain “Forward-Looking Statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and applicable Canadian securities laws. When used in this news release, the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “estimate”, “expect”, “target”, “plan”, “forecast”, “may”, “schedule” and other similar words or expressions identify forward-looking statements or information. These forward-looking statements or information may relate to intended development timelines, future prices of commodities, accuracy of mineral or resource exploration activity, reserves or resources, regulatory or government requirements or approvals, the reliability of third party information, continued access to mineral properties or infrastructure, fluctuations in the market for lithium and its derivatives, changes in exploration costs and government regulation in Canada and the United States, and other factors or information. Such statements represent the Company’s current views with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while considered reasonable by the Company, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political and social risks, contingencies and uncertainties. Many factors, both known and unknown, could cause results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the results, performance or achievements that are or may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to update these forward-looking statements or information to reflect changes in assumptions or changes in circumstances or any other events affecting such statements and information other than as required by applicable laws, rules and regulations.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Thomas Barnes Joins Monarch Private Capital’s #Bestinclass Renewable Energy Team

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    ATLANTA, April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Monarch Private Capital (Monarch), a nationally recognized impact investment firm that develops, finances, and manages a diversified portfolio of projects generating both federal and state tax credits, is pleased to welcome Thomas Barnes as Manager, Renewable Energy.

    In this newly-created role, Barnes will facilitate all aspects of investment execution, including onboarding, investment alignment, fund documentation, underwriting/closing, and subsequent fundings. He serves as a key liaison between Monarch’s investors and developer partners, working with internal placement, project management, operations, and asset management teams—ensuring a seamless and #bestinclass transaction process.

    Barnes brings extensive tax credit structuring and legal experience to Monarch. Prior to joining the firm, he held several roles within the renewable energy division at U.S. Bank, most recently serving as Syndications Project Manager. In that role, he led investor communications and due diligence efforts, negotiated transaction documents, and facilitated the closing of tax credit investments. Earlier in his tenure at U.S. Bank, Barnes served as an Asset Manager, overseeing a portfolio of renewable energy investments and supporting risk mitigation efforts across legal, tax, and credit functions. Before transitioning into renewable energy finance, Barnes practiced law for nearly a decade, focusing on corporate transactions and contract negotiation for a wide range of clients and industries.

    “Thomas brings a rare combination of legal acumen and transaction execution experience to our already strong team,” said Bryan Didier, Partner and Managing Director of Renewable Energy at Monarch Private Capital. “His ability to manage complexity, collaborate across functions, and drive high-quality outcomes for our investors will undoubtably enhance our #everbetter, #bestinclass execution process.”

    In addition to his transaction responsibilities, Barnes will contribute to process innovation, cross-functional collaboration, and risk management strategies across Monarch’s clean energy portfolio.

    “Monarch is known for its thoughtful, high-performing culture, and I’m excited to be a part of a team that prioritizes excellence and investor success,” said Barnes. “I look forward to contributing to a strong foundation that enables the firm to continue scaling with impact.”

    Barnes earned his Juris Doctor from the University of Minnesota Law School and a Bachelor of Arts in English from the University of St. Thomas. Committed to giving back, he has volunteered with organizations including Catholic Charities, Feed the Children, and Project Offstreets, and has mentored and coached youth in both Minneapolis and Denver.

    For more information about Monarch Private Capital, visit www.monarchprivate.com.

    About Monarch Private Capital

    Monarch Private Capital manages impact investment funds that positively impact communities by creating clean power, jobs, and homes. The funds provide predictable returns through the generation of federal and state tax credits. The Company offers innovative tax credit equity investments for affordable housing, historic rehabilitations, renewable energy, film, and other qualified projects. Monarch Private Capital has long-term relationships with institutional and individual investors, developers, and lenders participating in these federal and state programs. Headquartered in Atlanta, Monarch has offices and professionals located throughout the United States.

    CONTACT
    Jane Rafeedie
    Monarch Private Capital
    Jrafeedie@monarchprivate.com
    470-283-8431

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/11639d57-4ef6-4162-9d83-aa2972dbe120

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Australian Oilseeds Issues Annual Shareholder Letter

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    COOTAMUNDRA, Australia, April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited, a manufacturer and seller of sustainable edible oils to customers globally, today issued a letter to shareholders from Gary Seaton, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, that highlights recent performance and future milestones.

    Dear Fellow Shareholders,

    Across the globe, 2024 presented serious challenges including the ongoing war in Ukraine and serious conflicts in the Middle East and growing geopolitical discord, notably with China. Our hearts go out to those whose lives are profoundly affected by these events.

    Despite the unsettling geopolitical discord, we are pleased with our progress since launching the Company, as a Nasdaq listed company, and its unique products of Non-GMO cold-pressed and chemically-free processed oils.

    Within the last 12 months, we have sold our products through the majority of retailers in Australia, including Woolworths and Coles, the two largest supermarket chains in Australia, as well as Costco and Independent Grocers of Australia, an Australian chain of supermarkets (IGA), with sales and awareness gradually increasing. In addition to our expanding market presence in Australia, the Company has also been successful in exporting and marketing its products in Japan, China and Vietnam.

    Throughout the last year, we have demonstrated the power of our mission and guiding principles, as well as the value of being there for our customers. The result was continued healthy growth across our products and geographic expansion. Fiscal 2024 results were strong with revenues increasing by more than 16% driven by strong demand for our cold pressed canola oils. Our gross margin improved by 40 basis points and we delivered Adjusted EBITDA growth of nearly 16%. Our business momentum continues to build and we remain deeply committed to our mission as well as driving long-term value for our Shareholders.

    We believe we are well positioned for the future and anticipate several key milestones as we continue to execute our growth strategy. Within the next six months we expect that our Good Earth Oils brands of Australian Canola Oil and Olive oil will be launched in Taiwan and India. We are also expecting significant growth in China over the next 12 months as we benefit from Australia’s preferential duty for its products into China compared to Canada and USA, which have current import duties of 100% and 124% respectively. Finally, we intend to launch our products in the USA subject to clarity on the current tariff structure for Australian imports into the USA – the current tariff structure on Australian Canola Oil into the USA is 10%.

    I would like to express my deep gratitude to our Shareholders and our employees. We appreciate your continued support as we continue our exciting journey of taking chemicals out of the food supply chain and promoting healthy Canola Oil and Olive oil to consumers around the world along with the concept of regenerative farming.

    Sincerely,
    Gary Seaton
    Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

    About Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited. Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited, a Cayman Islands exempted company (the “Company”) (NASDAQ: COOT) through its subsidiaries, including Australian Oilseeds Investments Pty Ltd., an Australian proprietary company, tis focused on the manufacture and sale of sustainable oilseeds (e.g., seeds grown primarily for the production of edible oils) and is committed to working with all suppliers in the food supply chain to eliminate chemicals from the production and manufacturing systems to supply quality products to customers globally. The Company engages in the business of processing, manufacture and sale of non-GMO oilseeds and organic and non-organic food-grade oils, for the rapidly growing oilseeds market, through sourcing materials from suppliers focused on reducing the use of chemicals in consumables in order to supply healthier food ingredients, vegetable oils, proteins and other products to customers globally. Over the past 20 years, the Company’s cold pressing oil plant has grown to become the largest in Australia, pressing strictly GMO-free conventional and organic oilseeds.

    Contact
    Australian Oilseeds Holdings Limited
    126-142 Cowcumbla Street
    Cootamundra New South Wales 2590
    Attn: Amarjeet Singh, CFO
    Email: amarjeet.s@energreennutrition.com.au

    Investor Relations Contact
    Reed Anderson
    (646) 277-1260
    reed.anderson@icrinc.com

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Diginex and Baker Tilly Singapore Announce Strategic Alliance to Deliver diginexESG Platform to Baker Tilly ’s Clients

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    LONDON, April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Diginex Limited (“Diginex”) (NASDAQ: DGNX), a leading impact technology company specializing in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) solutions, and Baker Tilly Singapore (“Baker Tilly”), a globally recognized advisory, tax, and assurance firm, today announced a strategic alliance to integrate Diginex’s innovative diginexESG platform into Baker Tilly’s client offerings. This collaboration will empower Baker Tilly’s diverse client base to streamline ESG reporting, enhance compliance, and drive sustainable growth in response to increasing global demand for transparency and accountability.

    The diginexESG platform, an award-winning cloud-based solution compatible with major frameworks such as GRI, SASB, and ISSB, provides end-to-end tools for topic discovery, data collection, and collaborative report publishing. Through this alliance, Baker Tilly’s clients across industries will gain access to diginexESG’s intuitive technology, supported by Baker Tilly’s deep expertise in ESG advisory, risk management, and business strategy. The strategic relationship aims to simplify the complexities of sustainability reporting while enabling clients to meet evolving regulatory requirements and investor expectations.

    “We are excited to work with Baker Tilly, a trusted leader in professional services, to bring diginexESG to their clients,” said Mark Blick, CEO of Diginex. “This alliance aligns with our mission to democratize access to advanced ESG tools, helping organizations of all sizes achieve their sustainability goals while driving measurable impact.”

    Joshua Ong, Managing Partner at Baker Tilly Singapore, said, “We are committed to delivering innovative solutions that add value to our clients’ businesses, while solving challenges that they may face with fragmented systems and resources. This alliance with Diginex provides a new platform that enhances our clients’ daily operations and helps them to make informed decisions in building resilient, future-ready businesses.”

    “There is growing pressure in the Asia-Pacific region for companies to produce high-quality ESG data that meets global standards,” added Tina Thomas, Head of ESG & Sustainability at Baker Tilly Singapore.

    The alliance comes at a critical time as businesses face heightened scrutiny from regulators, investors, and stakeholders to demonstrate robust ESG performance. Baker Tilly’s global network, combined with Diginex’s cutting-edge technology, positions both firms to set a new standard for ESG reporting and compliance.

    About Diginex Limited

    Diginex Limited (Nasdaq: DGNX; ISIN KYG286871044), headquartered in London, is a sustainable RegTech business that empowers businesses and governments to streamline ESG, climate, and supply chain data collection and reporting. The Company utilizes blockchain, AI, machine learning and data analysis technology to lead change and increase transparency in corporate regulatory reporting and sustainable finance. Diginex’s products and services solutions enable companies to collect, evaluate and share sustainability data through easy-to-use software.

    The award-winning diginexESG platform supports 17 global frameworks, including GRI (the “Global Reporting Initiative”), SASB (the “Sustainability Accounting Standards Board”), and TCFD (the “Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures”). Clients benefit from end-to-end support, ranging from materiality assessments and data management to stakeholder engagement, report generation and an ESG Ratings Support Service.

    For more information, please visit the Company’s website: https://www.diginex.com/.

    About Baker Tilly Singapore
    Baker Tilly Singapore is a full-service accounting and business advisory firm that offers industry-specialised services in assurance, tax and advisory. With a focus on serving entrepreneurs, family-owned businesses, not-for-profits, and listed companies, we help our clients plan for the future. Baker Tilly Singapore is an independent member of Baker Tilly International, one of the world’s 10 largest accounting and business advisory networks.

    Baker Tilly Singapore offers a full suite of ESG services, including ESG assessment, strategy development, reporting and disclosure, stakeholder engagement, risk management, sustainability certification, ESG integration in investments, as well as training and education.

    For more information on Baker Tilly Singapore’s services, visit www.bakertilly.sg.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Certain statements in this announcement are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and are based on the Company’s current expectations and projections about future events that the Company believes may affect its financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. Investors can identify these forward-looking statements by words or phrases such as “approximates,” “believes,” “hopes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “would,” “should,” “could,” “may” or other similar expressions. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent occurring events or circumstances, or changes in its expectations, except as may be required by law. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure you that such expectations will turn out to be correct, and the Company cautions investors that actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results and encourages investors to review other factors that may affect its future results disclosed in the Company’s filings with the SEC.

    Media Contacts:

    Diginex
    Investor Relations
    Email: ir@diginex.com

    IR Contact – Europe
    Anna Höffken
    Phone: +49.40.609186.0
    Email: diginex@kirchhoff.de

    IR Contact – US
    Kincade Ayers
    Lambert by LLYC
    Phone: +1 (616) 258-5794
    Email: kincade.ayers@llyc.global

    IR Contact – Asia
    Shelly Cheng
    Strategic Public Relations Group Ltd.
    Phone: +852 2864 4857
    Email: sprg_diginex@sprg.com.hk

    Baker Tilly Singapore Contact
    Darrick Chew
    Marketing Manager
    darrick.chew@bakertilly.sg

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Axi Delivers Unbeatably Tight Spreads on Key Markets Including Gold, Crypto, and Forex

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    SYDNEY, April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Axi, a leading global online trading broker, is proud to announce its latest commitment to industry-leading pricing with some of the most competitive spreads in the market. Traders can now access spreads as tight as $0.15 on Gold, $15 on Bitcoin, and just 0.7 pips on EUR/USD—making Axi a top choice for retail and professional traders alike.

    Since its inception in 2007, Axi has built its reputation on a foundation of transparency, speed, and client-focused service. The broker continues to uphold this mission by offering exceptional trade execution, with latency as low as 29 milliseconds, even during periods of heightened market volatility.

    “We believe that traders deserve not only low costs but also honesty and performance they can rely on,” said Louis Cooper, Chief Commercial Officer at Axi. “Our goal has always been to help our clients trade with confidence, and this latest offering reflects our ongoing commitment to delivering real value.”

    With the increasing popularity of digital assets, Axi encourages traders to compare its spreads on Bitcoin and Ethereum and make informed decisions backed by pricing transparency and superior execution.

    Key Highlights:

    • Gold spreads from $0.15
    • Bitcoin spreads from $15
    • EUR/USD spreads from 0.7 pips
    • Execution latency as low as 29ms

    Whether you’re trading forex, gold, or cryptocurrencies, Axi provides the tools and conditions needed to navigate today’s markets with speed and confidence.

    About Axi:
    Axi is a global online FX and CFD trading company, with thousands of customers in 100+ countries worldwide. Axi offers CFDs for several asset classes including Forex, Shares, Gold, Oil, Coffee, and more.

    At Axi, we are proud of our reputation as an honest and fair broker, providing our customers with outstanding service and trading conditions since 2007. We also work with leading regulatory governing authorities globally to ensure we exceed the highest standards in the industry.

    For more information, please visit: www.axi.com 

    mediaenquiries@axi.com

    A photo accompanying this announcement is available at https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/589c4032-234d-4cb8-8f97-428d2ca0c850

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Independent Directors of Phillips 66 Issue Letter to Investors and Their Stewardship Teams

    Source: Phillips

    Encourages Honest, Independent Interrogation of Facts
    Raises Key Questions Stewardship Teams and Investors Should Reach Their Own Conclusions On

    HOUSTON–(BUSINESS WIRE)– Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX) today sent a letter from the Independent Directors of the Board to the Company’s shareholders and to independent proxy advisors, particularly those involved in assessing corporate governance topics.
    In conjunction with today’s letter, Phillips 66 published a new video to phillips66delivers.com. The video provides shareholders a unique perspective into how the Board approaches overseeing the Company’s strategy, monitoring progress against that strategy, allocating capital, engaging with shareholders and driving long-term value for Phillips 66 shareholders.
    The full text of the Board’s letter to investors and their stewardship teams follows:
    Dear Phillips 66 Shareholders,
    Due to the unique nature of shareholder engagement in 2025 and our concerns with the agenda Elliott is pushing, this letter is written directly to the stewardship teams, proxy advisers and all shareholders who prioritize strong corporate governance. This letter is intended to highlight critical areas for consideration that uniquely pertain to corporate governance, independence and transparency.
    It is our strongly held view that two core tenets of best-in-class corporate governance are transparency and independence. Transparency allows shareholders to make informed decisions with full, complete and straight-forward information. Independence ensures that a Board is impartial, unbiased and objective in its pursuit of protecting the interests of all shareholders.
    We have been surprised and concerned by the actions taken by Elliott in pursuit of its campaign to break-up Phillips 66. These actions, in our view, reveal a concerning disregard for good corporate governance, raise important questions of independence and demonstrate an alarming pattern of opaque disclosure.
    There are serious questions about Elliott’s expectation of director loyalty.
    Elliott is seeking to replace Bob Pease, a Board member it supported only one year ago.
    Does this sudden switch in support, and Elliott’s own acknowledgment of its effort to have one-on-one conversations with Bob during the time he has been on our Board, suggest an expectation of loyalty to the activist and its thesis instead of fair evaluation of what is in the best interest of all shareholders?
    Elliott, who is compensating its purportedly independent nominees, denied Phillips 66 access to those nominees for interview and evaluation, despite multiple attempts from Phillips 66. In fact, one of Elliott’s nominees told representatives of Phillips 66 that he was instructed not to engage directly and instead referred the Board to Elliott itself.
    Does this action further reveal an expectation of loyalty rather than true independence?
    Elliott’s competitive interests merit careful attention.
    Elliott’s subsidiary, Amber Energy, is in pursuit of a direct Phillips 66 competitor, CITGO. That pursuit has been ongoing for more than a year, and Elliott’s most recent bid for CITGO is valued meaningfully above the amount of Elliott’s investment in Phillips 66.
    Elliott’s public solicitation materials do not clearly mention its pursuit of CITGO, or that multiple members of the Amber Energy leadership team have been directly involved in soliciting Phillips 66 shareholders.
    On Elliott’s recent podcast episode, John Pike confirmed that the same Elliott professionals on their energy team invest in public equities and private situations. In other words, the same team that is investing in Phillips 66 is also leading the CITGO process.
    At what point does pursuit of control of a company while trying influence the strategy of a direct competitor raise conflicts of interest concerns? Has Elliott adequately disclosed this competitive position to Phillips 66 shareholders? Should shareholders have legitimate concerns about how Elliott’s interests may differ from those of other Phillips 66 shareholders?
    Elliott and affiliated parties have provided misleading, incomplete disclosure.
    The CEO of Elliott’s Amber Energy, Gregory Goff, issued a public letter claiming to be merely an investor in Phillips 66 in support of Elliott’s campaign. The day prior to this letter, Mr. Goff had entered into an agreement with Elliott where Mr. Goff’s solicitation expenses would be paid for by Elliott. Mr. Goff’s letter does not mention Amber Energy or its ongoing pursuit of CITGO, and it does not mention this agreement with Elliott.
    Why is Mr. Goff misleadingly soliciting Phillips 66 shareholders in his capacity as “a 40-year energy industry veteran and shareholder of Phillips 66” and not in his capacity as an interested Elliott employee? More importantly, why was that relationship not fully and clearly disclosed to Phillips 66 shareholders in the letter?
    A number of Elliott’s nominees have close personal ties to Mr. Goff, including decades of direct work experience. Much like everything related to Elliott’s Amber Energy, these relationships call into question Elliott’s nominees’ independence.
    Given Amber Energy’s role in the campaign against Phillips 66 and Mr. Goff’s highly misleading public solicitation, should shareholders have concerns about the honesty of Elliott’s disclosures or the independence of Elliott’s nominees?
    Elliott has put forth illegal corporate governance demands, masked by misleading communications.
    As you know, we are fully committed to declassifying the Board so that each of our directors is up for election each year. Our last attempt to do so received approval from 73% of outstanding shares. With the attention this annual meeting is receiving, we are hoping that voter turnout will be higher than ever to achieve this important governance milestone.
    But unlike Elliott, we want to do so legally, completely and without subjecting the Company to litigation and reputational harm.
    Elliott is asking us to devise a slipshod workaround to declassify the Board in a de facto manner, without obtaining the required stockholder vote to do so. Put simply, if implemented, Elliott’s annual resignation proposal would contravene Delaware law, our Company’s charter and by-laws and our Board’s fiduciary duty to shareholders. Some resignation policies are acceptable, but not those with the specific purpose of evading a corporate charter. We will not establish the dangerous precedent of conveniently disregarding and circumventing our fundamental governing documents.
    Don’t just take our word for it – a leading academic has said the proposal is “certainly creative; it is also, for three distinct reasons, illegal.”1We also received an advisory letter from a top Delaware law firm stating that, by implementing Elliott’s proposal, the Board would violate Delaware law and be exposed to potential claims for breaches of fiduciary duty. This leading law firm advised the Board not to implement Elliott’s proposal if passed.
    Legal experts have also commented that shareholders are not accustomed to seeing proposals that violate state law because the SEC allows companies to exclude shareholder proposals submitted under Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 that would, if implemented, cause the company to violate applicable law. The difference, here, is that Elliott has included its proposal withinits ownproxy solicitation, which bypasses the SEC’s Rule 14a-8 vetting process and allows Elliott to present its proposal and the 2025 Annual Meeting. The Company never had a chance to exclude the proposal, which we believe we would have achieved under Rule 14a-8 based on the legal advice given by a leading Delaware law firm that the Company does not have the power to implement the proposal.
    Do not be misled by Elliott’s claims that its mandatory resignation policy is legal because directors are already free to resign at any time, or its statements that its proposal is just voluntary. Any director canchooseto resign at any time, but a company policyrequiringsuch resignations to achieve de facto declassification is plainly illegal under well-settled Delaware law and our charter.Read for yourself – the plain text of Elliott’s proposal is arequirement, and the fact that directors can refuse to comply with it does not make it legitimate:“RESOLVED, that stockholders request that the Board adopt an annual election policy for directors, requiring each incumbent director (including directors with terms not set to expire at the next annual meeting) to deliver to the Board a letter of resignation effective at the next annual meeting of stockholders, each year prior to the nomination of director candidates for election at the annual meeting.”
    Why is Elliott distracting from our actual efforts to declassify in a legal manner? Why does Elliott feel that companies should treat their governing documents as optional? Why does Elliott want shareholders to act as lawyers, rather than submitting its proposal in a manner that would have allowed the SEC to review it for illegality? What Pandora’s box would be opened if shareholders approved proposals that companies would have to breach their duties to implement?
    Elliott’s lawsuit further exhibits its lack of transparency and preference for theatrics over engagement.
    Do not believe Elliott’s misleading claims that this Board ever intended to reduce the size of the class standing for election. Unlike Elliott’s proposal, which treats our charter as an option, we respect our governing documents and their requirement that our classes be as nearly equal as possible.
    Had Elliott waited just one more day – until March 26, the date Elliott was entitled to learn about our slate under the universal proxy rules – they would have seen that. Instead, they sought selective disclosure from us about our slate and then filed a lawsuit to compel what we were always planning to do – have four seats up for election this year.
    Why did Elliott knowingly file a distracting lawsuit when it knew we would reveal our slate the next day in accordance with the universal proxy rules? Why did Elliott think it was entitled to selective disclosure?
    In the spirit of transparency and strong corporate governance, we encourage you to gather all of the facts, assess these questions holistically and independently and reach your own conclusions.
    Sincerely,
    Independent Directors of the Phillips 66 Board of Directors
    About Phillips 66
    Phillips 66 (NYSE: PSX) is a leading integrated downstream energy provider that manufactures, transports and markets products that drive the global economy. The company’s portfolio includes Midstream, Chemicals, Refining, Marketing and Specialties, and Renewable Fuels businesses. Headquartered in Houston, Phillips 66 has employees around the globe who are committed to safely and reliably providing energy and improving lives while pursuing a lower-carbon future. For more information, visit phillips66.com or follow @Phillips66Co on LinkedIn.
    Forward-Looking Statements
    This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws relating to Phillips 66’s operations, strategy and performance. Words such as “anticipated,” “committed,” “estimated,” “expected,” “planned,” “scheduled,” “targeted,” “believe,” “continue,” “intend,” “will,” “would,” “objective,” “goal,” “project,” “efforts,” “strategies” and similar expressions that convey the prospective nature of events or outcomes generally indicate forward-looking statements. However, the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements included in this news release are based on management’s expectations, estimates and projections as of the date they are made. These statements are not guarantees of future events or performance, and you should not unduly rely on them as they involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements include: changes in governmental policies or laws that relate to our operations, including regulations that seek to limit or restrict refining, marketing and midstream operations or regulate profits, pricing, or taxation of our products or feedstocks, or other regulations that restrict feedstock imports or product exports; our ability to timely obtain or maintain permits necessary for projects; fluctuations in NGL, crude oil, refined petroleum, renewable fuels and natural gas prices, and refining, marketing and petrochemical margins; the effects of any widespread public health crisis and its negative impact on commercial activity and demand for refined petroleum or renewable fuels products; changes to worldwide government policies relating to renewable fuels and greenhouse gas emissions that adversely affect programs including the renewable fuel standards program, low carbon fuel standards and tax credits for renewable fuels; potential liability from pending or future litigation; liability for remedial actions, including removal and reclamation obligations under existing or future environmental regulations; unexpected changes in costs for constructing, modifying or operating our facilities; our ability to successfully complete, or any material delay in the completion of, any asset disposition, acquisition, shutdown or conversion that we have announced or may pursue, including receipt of any necessary regulatory approvals or permits related thereto; unexpected difficulties in manufacturing, refining or transporting our products; the level and success of drilling and production volumes around our midstream assets; risks and uncertainties with respect to the actions of actual or potential competitive suppliers and transporters of refined petroleum products, renewable fuels or specialty products; lack of, or disruptions in, adequate and reliable transportation for our products; failure to complete construction of capital projects on time or within budget; our ability to comply with governmental regulations or make capital expenditures to maintain compliance with laws; limited access to capital or significantly higher cost of capital related to illiquidity or uncertainty in the domestic or international financial markets, which may also impact our ability to repurchase shares and declare and pay dividends; potential disruption of our operations due to accidents, weather events, including as a result of climate change, acts of terrorism or cyberattacks; general domestic and international economic and political developments, including armed hostilities (such as the Russia-Ukraine war), expropriation of assets, and other diplomatic developments; international monetary conditions and exchange controls; changes in estimates or projections used to assess fair value of intangible assets, goodwill and property and equipment and/or strategic decisions with respect to our asset portfolio that cause impairment charges; investments required, or reduced demand for products, as a result of environmental rules and regulations; changes in tax, environmental and other laws and regulations (including alternative energy mandates); political and societal concerns about climate change that could result in changes to our business or increase expenditures, including litigation-related expenses; the operation, financing and distribution decisions of equity affiliates we do not control; and other economic, business, competitive and/or regulatory factors affecting Phillips 66’s businesses generally as set forth in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Phillips 66 is under no obligation (and expressly disclaims any such obligation) to update or alter its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
    Additional Information
    On April 8, 2025, Phillips 66 filed a definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A (the “Proxy Statement”) and accompanying WHITE proxy card with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in connection with its 2025 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2025 Annual Meeting”) and its solicitation of proxies for Phillips 66’s director nominees and for other matters to be voted on. This communication is not a substitute for the Proxy Statement or any other document that Phillips 66 has filed or may file with the SEC in connection with any solicitation by Phillips 66. PHILLIPS 66 SHAREHOLDERS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT (AND ANY AMENDMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTS THERETO) AND ACCOMPANYING WHITE PROXY CARD AND ANY OTHER RELEVANT SOLICITATION MATERIALS FILED WITH THE SEC AS THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. Shareholders may obtain copies of the Proxy Statement, any amendments or supplements to the Proxy Statement and other documents (including the WHITE proxy card) filed by Phillips 66 with the SEC without charge from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Copies of the documents filed by Phillips 66 with the SEC also may be obtained free of charge at Phillips 66’s investor relations website at https://investor.phillips66.com or upon written request sent to Phillips 66, 2331 CityWest Boulevard, Houston, TX 77042, Attention: Investor Relations.
    Certain Information Regarding Participants
    Phillips 66, its directors, its director nominees and certain of its executive officers and employees may be deemed to be participants in connection with the solicitation of proxies from Phillips 66 shareholders in connection with the matters to be considered at the 2025 Annual Meeting. Information regarding the names of such persons and their respective interests in Phillips 66, by securities holdings or otherwise, is available in the Proxy Statement, which was filed with the SEC on April 8, 2025, including in the sections captioned “Beneficial Ownership of Phillips 66 Securities” and “Appendix C: Supplemental Information Regarding Participants in the Solicitation.” To the extent that Phillips 66’s directors and executive officers who may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation have acquired or disposed of securities holdings since the applicable “as of” date disclosed in the Proxy Statement, such transactions have been or will be reflected on Statements of Changes in Ownership of Securities on Form 4 or Initial Statements of Beneficial Ownership of Securities on Form 3 filed with the SEC. These documents are or will be available free of charge at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
    1 Andrew Verstein, “How Not to De‑Classify a Board,” The CLS Blue Sky Blog, April 22, 2025. https://clsbluesky.law.columbia.edu/2025/04/22/how-not-to-de%E2%80%91classify-a-board/

    Source: Phillips 66

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Newsom announces appointments 4.23.25

    Source: US State of California 2

    Apr 23, 2025

    SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the following appointments:

    Annabelle Hopkins, of Sacramento, has been appointed Deputy Director of Government Affairs at the California Public Advocates Office. Hopkins has been Government Relations Manager at RWE Offshore Wind since 2024. She was Legislative Director at the Office of Assemblymember Jim Wood in the California State Assembly from 2022 to 2023. Hopkins held multiple positions in the Office of Senator Dave Min in the California State Senate from 2021 to 2022, including Legislative Director and Legislative Aide. She was a Senate Fellow in the Office of Senator Mike McGuire in the California State Senate from 2019 to 2020. Hopkins was the Finance Director/Policy Advisor for Audrey Denney for Congress from 2018 to 2019. She is a Board Member of FemDems and Young Professionals in Energy, Sacramento. Hopkins earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science and History from College of Wooster. This position does not require Senate confirmation, and compensation is $153,000. Hopkins is a Democrat.

    Mandi Posner, of Gold River, has been appointed Deputy Director of the Center for Health Care Quality at the California Department of Public Health. Posner has been Chief of Field Operations for the South Division of the Center for Health Care Quality at the California Department of Public Health since 2021, where she has held multiple positions since 2016, including Branch Chief of Field Operations for the South Division, Los Angeles County Contract Manager, Staff Services Manager for Fiscal Operations, and Associate Governmental Program Analyst. Posner is a Member and California Representative of the Association of Health Facility Survey Agencies. She earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Recreation Administration from California State University, Chico. This position does not require Senate confirmation, and the compensation is $183,840. Posner is a Democrat.

    Yang Lee, of Sacramento, has been appointed Chief of Data Analytics and Strategy at the California Department of Developmental Services. Lee has been Deputy Director and Chief Financial Officer at the California Department of Social Services since 2022, where he was previously Assistant Director from 2020 to 2022. He held multiple positions at the California Department of Finance from 2008 to 2020, including Principal Program Budget and Finance Budget Analyst. Lee was a Legislative Assistant in the Office of Assemblymember Loni Hancock in the California State Assembly from 2006 to 2008. Lee earned a Master of Public Policy Analysis degree and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Ethnic Studies from California State University, Sacramento. This position does not require Senate confirmation, and the compensation is $198,660. Lee is a Democrat. 

    Heather Leslie, of Sacramento, has been appointed Chief Counsel at the California Office of Energy Infrastructure Safety. Leslie has been the Assistant General Counsel at the California Natural Resources Agency since 2021. She was a Deputy Attorney General at the California Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General from 2015 to 2021. Leslie earned a Juris Doctor degree from University of California, Los Angeles School of Law and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from University of California, Berkeley. This position does not require Senate confirmation, and compensation is $198,000. Leslie is a Democrat.

    Cindy Gustafson, of Tahoe City, has been appointed to the State Board of Fire Services. Gustafson has been the District Five County Supervisor for the County of Placer since 2019. She was the Chief Executive Officer of the North Lake Tahoe Resort Association from 2017 to 2018. Gustafson held multiple positions at the Tahoe City Public Utility District from 1991 to 2017, including Director of Resource Development and Community Relations, Assistant General Manager, and General Manager. She was a Commissioner at the California Fish and Game Commission from 2005 to 2009. Gustafson is a Member of Tahoe Fund. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in History from Gustavus Adolphus College. This position does not require Senate Confirmation and there is no compensation. Gustafson is registered without party preference.

    Hampus Idsater, of Thousand Oaks, has been appointed to the Boating and Waterways Commission. Idsater has been an Investment Manager at Suntex Marina Investors since 2022. He was a Finance and Business Development Director at Hamner, Jewell & Associates from 2020 to 2022. Idsater was a Vice President at Eight Roads from 2015 to 2020. He was an Investment Manager at Fosun International from 2013 to 2015. Idsater was an Analyst at Morgan Stanley from 2011 to 2013. He is a Member of the Marine Recreation Association and Toastmasters International. Idsater earned a Master of Arts degree in Economics from University of Oxford. This position requires Senate confirmation, and the compensation is $100 per diem. Idsater is a Democrat.

    Press Releases, Recent News

    Recent news

    News What you need to know: California’s economy continues to dominate and grow at a faster rate than the world’s top economies, with new data showing it has overtaken Japan as the 4th largest economy in the world. SACRAMENTO — Governor Gavin Newsom today announced…

    News What you need to know: California is investing $500 million to help add 1,000 clean school buses across the state, and demand for incentives supporting zero-emission buses and trucks has more than doubled year-over-year. SACRAMENTO – California’s transition to…

    News What you need to know: More than 4 million California children will automatically receive SUN Bucks food benefits via EBT card starting in June. Each eligible child will receive $120 in food benefits. Sacramento, California – Governor Gavin Newsom announced today…

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: 1,000 more clean school buses coming soon to California roads as state sees big demand for zero-emission buses and trucks

    Source: US State of California 2

    Apr 23, 2025

    What you need to know: California is investing $500 million to help add 1,000 clean school buses across the state, and demand for incentives supporting zero-emission buses and trucks has more than doubled year-over-year.

    SACRAMENTO – California’s transition to zero-emission transportation is accelerating faster than ever thanks to incentives and investments from the state.

    Following an announcement last August on plans to expand California’s largest-in-the-nation zero-emission school bus fleet, Governor Gavin Newsom today announced that $500 million has been awarded for educational agencies to buy zero-emission school buses and chargers. 

    Governor Newsom also announced that California saw a 177% increase in the state’s Clean Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP) from 2023 to 2024. This program is funded primarily with proceeds from the cap-and-trade program and provides point-of-sale discounts to make zero-emission trucks and buses more accessible for fleets and businesses. In February alone more than 200 HVIP-funded zero-emission trucks and buses were deployed with $31 million in incentives.

    California is paving the way to a cleaner, healthier future by investing in zero-emission vehicles across the state. From clean buses for kids in some of our most polluted communities to electric semi-trucks that provide the backbone for California businesses – we’re proving that clean transportation is here to stay.

    Governor Gavin Newsom

    Why it matters

    🚌 Clean school buses funded by the state are expected to reduce 18,000 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually — equivalent to taking more than 4,000 cars off the road for a year. Over 70% of the zero-emission school buses in use are in California’s most pollution-burdened communities.

     While trucks total just 6% of vehicles on California’s roads, they account for over 35% of the state’s transportation emissions. Clean vehicles purchased through HVIP are helping to significantly cut emissions statewide, with 340+ million miles logged since the start of the program. while.

    Investing in clean school buses

    The Zero-Emissions School Bus and Infrastructure (ZESBI) project has selected 133 educational agencies to receive 1,000 zero-emission school buses and related charging infrastructure in rural, low-income, and disadvantaged school districts and other local educational entities. The grants are expected to be finalized by the end of the year. A map of awardees can be viewed here.

    “Cleaning up the state’s school bus fleet is central to California’s efforts to provide clean transportation in priority communities that are disproportionately hurt by air pollution,” said California Air Resources Board Chair Liane Randolph. “The vast majority of these grants will go to local educational agencies that serve these communities.”

    To date, California has provided more than $1.3 billion in incentives to school districts, funding more than 2,300 zero-emission school buses, of which 1,100 are already in use. More than 300 California school districts and local education agencies have purchased at least one zero-emission school bus – and a few have made the switch to a 100% clean fleet.

    “California has set important benchmarks for removing internal combustion vehicles from our roads and replacing them with clean transportation,” said California Energy Commission Chair David Hochschild. “CEC is helping school districts move in that direction by funding ZESBI.”

    Zero-emission school buses play a key role in California’s efforts to achieve carbon neutrality by 2045 and help protect children who are particularly vulnerable to the health impacts from diesel exhaust. In California, all school bus purchases made by school districts will need to be zero-emission technology by 2035, with an extension until 2045 for frontier local educational agencies in rural communities.

    Incentivizing clean trucks and buses

    Over 15 years, the state’s Clean Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP) invested $754 million, helping 2,000 fleets deploy 10,000 clean trucks and buses. These vehicles have logged 340+ million miles while significantly cutting emissions statewide. Over 5,000 HVIP-funded ZEVs are in production to meet surging demand.

    HVIP is a CARB program administered by CALSTART, a nonprofit transportation organization. Sales of new zero-emission trucks, buses and vans doubled in 2023 over the previous year, representing one out of every six new vehicles sold for services including last-mile delivery, freight transportation, and school buses. 16,327 charging and hydrogen fueling points for zero-emission trucks and buses are installed across the state.

    Press Releases, Recent News

    Recent news

    News What you need to know: More than 4 million California children will automatically receive SUN Bucks food benefits via EBT card starting in June. Each eligible child will receive $120 in food benefits. Sacramento, California – Governor Gavin Newsom announced today…

    News What you need to know: 14,133 cases have been referred to district attorneys’ offices through a community grant investment proposed by Governor Gavin Newsom to root out organized retail crime and hold bad actors accountable. Sacramento, California – Marking a…

    News SACRAMENTO – Governor Gavin Newsom today announced the following appointments:Claire Cullis, of Carmichael, has been appointed Deputy Secretary of Business and Consumer Relations at the California Business, Consumer Services, and Housing Agency. Cullis has been…

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Future of Energy Security summit: Energy Secretary opening remarks

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    Future of Energy Security summit: Energy Secretary opening remarks

    The Energy Secretary delivered opening remarks at the International Energy Agency (IEA) Future of Energy Security summit.

    Francine, thank you so much.  

    And distinguished delegates, on behalf of the UK government and the International Energy Agency, I want to welcome you all to this historic setting of Lancaster House and to London for this first global summit on the Future of Energy Security. 

    As Francine has said, there are numerous countries represented here – almost 60 countries represented here today.  

    And I want to thank each and every one of you who have made the trip here. We truly appreciate your presence and we really look forward to the discussions over the coming 2 days. 

    We also have leaders from more than 50 global businesses with us. 

    And I want to thank all of you for everything you do to help create energy security for our countries and our world.  

    And we also have NGOs and civil society groups from around the world who are here with us, who play an important role in ensuring accountability of governments.

    I also want to pay a specific thank you to the official partners of the summit: Iberdrola-Scottish Power, National Grid, SSE and Urenco.  

    And if I may, I want to also thank the teams at the International Energy Agency and across the UK government who have worked incredibly hard to pull this event together. It is some feat of organisation. 

    And I want if I may also to pay particular tribute to Fatih Birol. Fatih, your leadership of the IEA for nearly a decade now has been marked by your commitment to rigour, to values and to multilateral cooperation. That is why the IEA is so central to the global discussion on energy, and I want to thank you. Perhaps the audience could show our appreciation for Fatih and the work he does.  

    You’ve got much more interesting people than me to hear from in these coming sessions, but let me make a few remarks to frame our discussions over the next 2 days.  

    First, our starting point for this summit is that in an unstable and uncertain world, there can be no national or international security without energy security.   

    And indeed it is now more than 50 years since the IEA was founded in response to the oil crisis of 1973.

    Over that time, the challenges we face have changed.  

    But I think the principle underpinning the IEA’s work – that countries need to collaborate to secure the uninterrupted supply of energy at an affordable price – remains the same.  

    And in the years since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine we’ve been reminded in the UK, and indeed across Europe and the world of a simple truth:  

    That as long as energy can be weaponised against us, our countries and our citizens are vulnerable and exposed.  

    It is for this reason that energy security is also at the heart of economic security – because it is central to living standards, job creation and economic growth.  

    And we hope this summit marks an important moment for countries to come together and discuss what the shifting global landscape means for how we deliver energy security in this era.

    Second, the act of bringing together, which is an initiative that I’ve taken alongside Fatih and the IEA, I think stems from an underlying belief that can unite us all, which is there is huge benefit for us from cooperating on the basis of our shared interests.  

    I think it’s really important to say every country faces its own energy security challenges and its own constraints.  

    And each country will pursue its own pathway, following its national interest in securing its energy supplies.  

    Different pathways – and I think this is a really important point for this conference – different pathways for different nations should be respected.   

    And we will all get a chance to reflect on our different national circumstances in our discussions over the coming days.  

    But here is the key thing: whatever our national pathways, I do believe that we share a fundamental belief that shared challenges invite shared solutions.  

    Multilateral co-operation can make us stronger not weaker – in our own individual national interest.  

    Third point – hopefully this is also a uniting idea – I believe that we gathered here are the optimists about what we can achieve for our society. Business, government, civil society – I believe we are, in this energy sector, the optimists.  

    Abundant energy can raise living standards, economic growth and deliver for today’s and future generations of citizens. 

    For the UK, just to talk about us for a moment, there is an exciting vision of energy security and abundance from cheap, homegrown, low carbon power.  

    Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, we saw family finances, business finances and public finances wrecked as fossil fuel prices rocketed on the global markets, and therefore here in Britain.  

    Now oil and gas, including from our North Sea, will continue to play an important role in our energy system, and we really value our industry and the jobs it supports. But as with many countries, we are a price taker not a price maker in international fossil fuel markets.  

    So our vision of low carbon power goes well beyond the climate imperative — important as that is. Homegrown low carbon power is our nationally chosen route to energy security.  

    Solar power, wind power, tidal, geothermal, nuclear power – also an essential part of the low carbon opportunity.  

    These are often unlimited, low-cost power supplies which we can exploit for the benefit of our citizens.  

    So to be clear about this, ours is a hard-headed approach to the role of low carbon power as the route to energy security. 

    And I believe this isn’t just true for the UK – alongside a continuing important role for oil and gas, low carbon energy can play a critical role in delivering energy security for many countries around the world.  

    And it presents a solution to the issue of energy security that simply wasn’t true in the same way as a decade and a half ago – and this again is important – and that’s because of what many countries in this room, working with business, public and private sector together, have achieved.  

    The cost of solar globally has fallen by 90% since 2010.   

    Offshore wind by more than 60%.  

    That’s in part why last year, $2 trillion was invested in clean energy with 80% of new electricity generation met by renewables and nuclear.  

    Indeed, according to BNEF, for more than two-thirds of the world’s population, new renewables are the cheapest source of bulk power generation.  

    In the spirit of multilateralism, the UK is determined to work with others to accelerate this transition, including through our Global Clean Power Alliance, which the Prime Minister launched at the G20 last year.  

    Final point, let me finish by saying that at a time when so much of what is happening in the world looks so intractable, I hope we can carry this spirit of optimism into our deliberations.  

    And I hope genuinely that everyone here enjoys this event and your time in London. 

    I want to end with the following message from His Majesty The King that he has asked me to read out to you all because this summit is something that he was very much personally interested in.  

    And this is the message from King Charles: 

    As we all navigate the transition to cleaner energy for our planet and energy security for our citizens, summits such as these are of vital importance in facilitating shared learning between nations, particularly those in the global south and across the Commonwealth.  

    Events over recent years have shown that, when well-managed, the transition to more sustainable energy sources can itself lead to more resilient and secure energy systems.  

    While each country will follow its individual path, there are many shared challenges and opportunities on which we can work together, as partners. 

    And he ends by saying: 

    I wanted to take this opportunity to thank you all for participating in this summit on the future of energy security, and to send my warmest best wishes for productive discussions over the coming days.

    Ladies and gentlemen, thank you so much for your attendance, and now it’s my huge privilege to introduce the Executive Director of the IEA, Dr Fatih Birol.

    Updates to this page

    Published 24 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Create Better Sleeping Habits with the Samsung Galaxy Ring

    Source: Samsung

    With the recently launched Galaxy Ring, Samsung is redefining wearable technology by combining sleek design, advanced health sensors, and powerful insights into one simple, elegant device. The cutting-edge wearable is designed to transform the way we approach sleep management and overall wellness. Boasting advanced technology and powerful health features, the Galaxy Ring provides users with personalised insights that promote better sleep habits and a more mindful, healthier lifestyle.

    Revolutionise Your Sleep Routine
    The Galaxy Ring isn’t just another sleep tracker – it’s your personal sleep assistant. Equipped with Samsung Health, the Galaxy Ring offers tailored sleep suggestions based on your unique sleep patterns, habits, and conditions. By analysing both your sleep quality and daily routines, it recommends the most suitable bedtime to ensure you get the rest you deserve.
     
    Sleep Tracking and Insights
    The Galaxy Ring goes beyond basic sleep analysis, providing actionable insights for improving sleep hygiene. It suggests optimal bedtimes and tracks sleep quality to help users establish healthy routines. Plus, with snore detection capabilities, you’ll be able to assess your sleep environment and discover how to address potential disruptions.
     

     
    Sleep Score
    The Galaxy Ring offers personalised Sleep Scores, a comprehensive assessment of your sleep quality. By evaluating various factors, such as how long you stay in deep sleep versus lighter stages, the ring provides suggestions on how to improve your nightly rest, empowering you to make data-driven decisions for better sleep health.
     
    Exceptional Design and Advanced Health Features
    Crafted with precision, the Galaxy Ring features a sleek and slim curved body made from durable, lightweight titanium[1]. Available in three stylish colours, silver, gold, and black, it is designed to be worn comfortably on any finger. The smart ring also includes LED lights, which indicate its charging progress, so you always know how much battery life remains. The ring combines cutting-edge health technology to track more than just sleep. It’s your go-to device for monitoring your daily activities, including heart rate, skin temperature, and movement.
     
    Heart Rate Monitoring
    With its built-in heart rate monitor sensor[2], the Galaxy Ring filters out any body movement for more accurate readings, allowing users to make better-informed decisions about their health and well-being.
     
    Mindfulness Tracker
    Take your mental health to the next level with the mindfulness tracker. By monitoring your mood, the Galaxy Ring enables you to use Samsung Health’s curated breathing exercises and meditations. All these tools are conveniently accessible in a single tracker, giving you a holistic approach to managing your stress and improving your sleep quality.
     
    Energy Score
    The Galaxy Ring also calculates your Energy Score[3] using Galaxy AI. This score reflects your physical readiness for the day, based on sleep quality, heart rate, and activities from the previous day. It helps you understand how well-rested and prepared you are to tackle the day ahead.
     
    Long-Lasting Power
    The Galaxy Ring features an impressive battery life of up to seven days on a single charge[4], so you can focus on your health and sleep without worrying about frequent recharges. It’s all about less charging and more tracking—keeping you on top of your health and wellness without the interruptions.
     

     
    The Galaxy Ring is available in Samsung stores, online, the Samsung Shop App, as well as participating retailers and operators, at a recommended retail price of R7,999[5].
     
    [1] Titanium is only applied on Galaxy Ring device frame.
    [2] The heart rate software functions are not intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment or prevention of disease.
    [3] Energy Score insights track data and require compatible Samsung Galaxy AI phone, Samsung Health app and Samsung account.
    [4] Based on the battery life of a size 13 product. Battery life will vary depending on ring size.
    [5] Recommended Retail Price Only. Prices may vary per retailer.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI: Amalgamated Financial Corp. Reports First Quarter 2025 Financial Results; $446 Million Total Deposit Growth; Strong Margin at 3.55%

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    NEW YORK, April 24, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Amalgamated Financial Corp. (the “Company” or “Amalgamated”) (Nasdaq: AMAL), the holding company for Amalgamated Bank (the “Bank”), today announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2025.

    First Quarter 2025 Highlights (on a linked quarter basis)

    • Net income of $25.0 million, or $0.81 per diluted share, compared to $24.5 million, or $0.79 per diluted share.
    • Core net income1 of $27.1 million, or $0.88 per diluted share, compared to $28.0 million, or $0.90 per diluted share.

           Deposits and Liquidity

    • On-balance sheet deposits increased $231.5 million, or 3.2%, to $7.4 billion.
    • Off-balance sheet deposits were $214.5 million at the end of the quarter, comprised of mainly not-for-profit deposits and some political deposits.
    • Including deposits held off-balance sheet, total deposits increased $445.9 million, or 6.2%, to $7.6 billion.
    • Political deposits increased $102.7 million, or 11%, to $1.1 billion, which includes both on and off-balance sheet deposits.
    • Average cost of deposits, excluding Brokered CDs and off-balance sheet deposits, increased 7 basis points to 159 basis points, where non-interest-bearing deposits comprised 39% of total deposits.
    • Cash and borrowing capacity totaled $3.3 billion (immediately available) plus unpledged securities (two-day availability) of $301.0 million for total liquidity within two-days of $3.6 billion.
    • Total two-day liquidity is 94% of total uninsured deposits, and 164% of uninsured non-super core deposits1.

          Assets and Margin

    • Net interest margin decreased 4 basis points to 3.55%, as expected.
    • Net interest income decreased by $2.5 million, or 3.4%, to $70.6 million, as expected.
    • Net loans receivable increased $7.0 million, or 0.2%, to $4.6 billion.
    • Net loans in growth mode (commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, and multifamily) increased $25.8 million or 0.9%.
    • Total PACE assessments grew $3.2 million, or 0.3%, to $1.2 billion.
    • The multifamily and commercial real estate loan portfolios totaled $1.8 billion and had a concentration of 199% to total risk based capital.

           Capital and Returns

    • Tier 1 leverage ratio of 9.22%, increased by 22 basis points, and Common Equity Tier 1 ratio of 14.27%.
    • Tangible common equity1 ratio increased to 8.73%, representing a tenth consecutive quarter of improvement.
    • Tangible book value per share1 increased $0.91, or 4.0%, to $23.51, and has increased $6.18, or 35.7% since September 2021.
    • Core return on average tangible common equity1 of 15.54% and core return on average assets1 of 1.33%.

    Share Repurchase

    • Repurchased approximately 105,000 shares, or $3.5 million of common stock, through March 31, 2025.
    • On March 10, 2025, a new $40 million share repurchase program was approved, under which approximately 75,000 shares have been repurchased from April 1 through April 22, 2025.

    Priscilla Sims Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer, commented, “All of our key earnings metrics came in strong and as expected, showing again that at Amalgamated, we do what we say we will. Our balance sheet boasts a low-risk asset profile including low commercial real-estate lending concentration, high levels of immediate and two-day liquidity, and return metrics near the top of our peer stack.”

    First Quarter Earnings

    Net income was $25.0 million, or $0.81 per diluted share, compared to $24.5 million, or $0.79 per diluted share, for the prior quarter. The $0.5 million increase during the quarter was primarily driven by a $3.1 million decrease in provision for credit losses, as well as a $0.8 million net valuation gain on residential loans sold during the quarter, compared to a $4.1 million reduction in fair value on residential loans moved to held for sale in the previous quarter. This was offset by an expected $2.5 million decrease in net interest income, an expected $1.9 million decrease in non-core income from solar tax equity investments, an expected $1.3 million decrease in non-core ICS One-Way Sell fee income from off-balance sheet deposits, and a $1.1 million increase in income tax expense.

    Core net income1 was $27.1 million, or $0.88 per diluted share, compared to $28.0 million, or $0.90 per diluted share, for the prior quarter. Excluded from core net income for the quarter, pre-tax, was $2.9 million of accelerated depreciation from solar tax equity investments, a $0.8 million net valuation gain from residential loans sold during the quarter, and $0.7 million of losses on the sale of securities. Excluded from core net income for the fourth quarter of 2024, pre-tax, was a $4.1 million reduction in fair value on a pool of lower yielding performing residential loans moved to held for sale, $1.3 million of ICS One-Way Sell fee income, $1.0 million of losses on the sale of securities, and $0.9 million of accelerated depreciation from solar tax equity investments.

    Net interest income was $70.6 million, compared to $73.1 million for the prior quarter. This decrease was expected as interest bearing off-balance sheet deposits moved back on balance sheet towards the end of the fourth quarter to replace largely non-interest bearing deposit outflow related to the election cycle conclusion and the full effect of interest rate resets from the prior quarter were recognized. Loan interest income and loan yields remained flat mainly as a $75.5 million increase in average loan balances was offset by paydowns on shorter-term high yielding commercial & industrial loans and a shorter day count in the quarter. Interest income on securities decreased $1.8 million driven by a decrease in the average balance of securities of $92.8 million. Interest expense on total interest-bearing deposits increased $0.3 million driven by an increase in the average balance of total interest-bearing deposits of $272.3 million partially offset by a 9 basis point decrease in cost. Additionally, while the average balance of borrowings increased $35.6 million, all short-term borrowings utilized at year-end were paid off over the course of the quarter. Remaining borrowings now substantially consist of lower-cost subordinated debt priced at 3.25% with a fixed rate maturity in November 2026.

    Net interest margin was 3.55%, an expected decrease of 4 basis points from 3.59% in the prior quarter. The decrease is largely due to a higher average balance of interest-bearing deposits as noted above, a $338.2 million decrease in non-interest bearing deposits, as well as a higher cost of funds. Prepayment penalties had no impact on net interest margin in the current quarter, compared to a one basis point impact in the prior quarter.

    Provision for credit losses totaled an expense of $0.6 million, compared to an expense of $3.7 million in the prior quarter. The expense in the first quarter was primarily driven by charge-offs on the consumer solar and small business portfolios, as well as increases in reserves for one leveraged commercial and industrial loan, offset by improvements in macro-economic forecasts used in the CECL model, primarily related to the consumer solar loan portfolio, which can be volatile.

    Non-interest income was $6.4 million, compared to $4.8 million in the prior quarter. Excluding all non-core income adjustments noted above, core non-interest income1 was $9.1 million, compared to $9.5 million in the prior quarter. The decrease was primarily related to lower commercial banking fees, offset by modestly higher income from Trust fees.

    Non-interest expense was $41.7 million, an increase of $0.5 million from the prior quarter. Core non-interest expense1 was $41.5 million, an increase of $0.4 million from the prior quarter. This was mainly driven by a $2.1 million increase in professional fees related to expected increases in digital transformation deployment and partnership costs to evaluate growth requirements and other advisory services. This increase is mainly offset by a $1.4 million decrease in compensation and employee benefits expense.

    Provision for income tax expense was $9.7 million, compared to $8.6 million for the prior quarter. The effective tax rate was 28.0%, compared to 25.9% in the prior quarter. The increase in the tax rate was the result of a higher annual effective tax rate for 2025, in addition to discrete tax items related to a city and state tax examination which led to a net increase in tax provision in the current quarter, as well as additional discrete items in the prior quarter which resulted in a tax benefit. Excluding these discrete items, the tax rate would have been 27.0%, compared to 26.6% in the prior quarter.

    Balance Sheet Quarterly Summary

    Total assets were $8.3 billion at March 31, 2025, compared to $8.3 billion at December 31, 2024, keeping the balance sheet neutral. Notable changes within individual balance sheet line items include a $65.1 million increase in securities and a $17.9 million increase in resell agreements to solidify net interest income, as well as a $7.0 million increase in net loans receivable. On the liabilities side, on-balance sheet deposits increased by $231.5 million while borrowings decreased by $244.7 million. Off-balance sheet deposits increased to $214.5 million in the quarter.

    Total net loans receivable at March 31, 2025 were $4.6 billion, an increase of $7.0 million, or 0.2% for the quarter. The increase in loans is primarily driven by a $20.3 million increase in multifamily loans, and a $7.8 million increase in commercial and industrial loans, offset by a $2.4 million decrease in commercial real estate loans, a $8.9 million decrease in consumer solar loans, and a $9.8 million decrease in residential loans. During the quarter, criticized or classified loans decreased $12.0 million, largely related to payoffs of three delinquent commercial and industrial loans totaling $10.1 million, the upgrade of one $1.4 million commercial & industrial loan, charge-offs of small business loans totaling $0.8 million, and a decrease of $4.5 million in residential and consumer substandard loans. This was offset by the downgrade of one $4.2 million commercial & industrial loan to special mention, and additional downgrades of small business loans totaling $1.0 million.

    Total on-balance sheet deposits at March 31, 2025 were $7.4 billion, an increase of $231.5 million, or 3.2%, during the quarter. Including accounts currently held off-balance sheet, deposits held by politically active customers, such as campaigns, PACs, advocacy-based organizations, and state and national party committees were $1.1 billion as of March 31, 2025, an increase of $102.7 million during the quarter. Non-interest-bearing deposits represented 39% of average total deposits and 39% of ending total deposits for the quarter, contributing to an average cost of total deposits of 159 basis points. Super-core deposits1 totaled approximately $4.0 billion, had a weighted average life of 18 years, and comprised 54% of total deposits, excluding Brokered CDs. Total uninsured deposits were $3.9 billion, comprising 52% of total deposits.

    Nonperforming assets totaled $33.9 million, or 0.41% of period-end total assets at March 31, 2025, an increase of $8.0 million, compared with $25.9 million, or 0.31% on a linked quarter basis. The increase in nonperforming assets was primarily driven by an $11.8 million increase in commercial & industrial non-accrual loans, including one $8.3 million commercial & industrial loan that was placed on non-accrual in the quarter. This was offset by the sale of $3.9 million in nonperforming residential loans that were reported as held-for-sale in the prior quarter.

    During the quarter, the allowance for credit losses on loans decreased $2.4 million to $57.7 million. The ratio of allowance to total loans was 1.23%, a decrease of 6 basis points from 1.29% in the fourth quarter of 2024. The decrease was primarily the result of improvements in the macroeconomic forecasts used in the CECL model, mainly related to the consumer solar loan portfolio, which can be volatile, offset by charge-offs on consumer solar and small business portfolios, as well as increases in reserves for one legacy leveraged commercial and industrial loan.

    Capital Quarterly Summary

    As of March 31, 2025, the Common Equity Tier 1 Capital ratio was 14.27%, the Total Risk-Based Capital ratio was 16.61%, and the Tier 1 Leverage Capital ratio was 9.22%, compared to 13.90%, 16.26% and 9.00%, respectively, as of December 31, 2024. Stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2025 was $736.0 million, an increase of $28.3 million during the quarter. The increase in stockholders’ equity was primarily driven by $25.0 million of net income for the quarter and a $11.3 million improvement in accumulated other comprehensive loss due to the tax-effected mark-to-market on available for sale securities, offset by $4.3 million in dividends paid at $0.14 per outstanding share.

    Tangible book value per share1 was $23.51 as of March 31, 2025 compared to $22.60 as of December 31, 2024. Tangible common equity1 improved to 8.73% of tangible assets, compared to 8.41% as of December 31, 2024.

    Conference Call

    As previously announced, Amalgamated Financial Corp. will host a conference call to discuss its first quarter 2025 results today, April 24, 2025 at 11:00am (Eastern Time). The conference call can be accessed by dialing 1-877-407-9716 (domestic) or 1-201-493-6779 (international) and asking for the Amalgamated Financial Corp. First Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. A telephonic replay will be available approximately two hours after the call and can be accessed by dialing 1-844-512-2921, or for international callers 1-412-317-6671 and providing the access code 13752421. The telephonic replay will be available until May 1, 2025.

    Interested investors and other parties may also listen to a simultaneous webcast of the conference call by logging onto the investor relations section of the Company’s website at https://ir.amalgamatedbank.com/. The online replay will remain available for a limited time beginning immediately following the call.

    The presentation materials for the call can be accessed on the investor relations section of the Company’s website at https://ir.amalgamatedbank.com/.

    About Amalgamated Financial Corp.

    Amalgamated Financial Corp. is a Delaware public benefit corporation and a bank holding company engaged in commercial banking and financial services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Amalgamated Bank. Amalgamated Bank is a New York-based full-service commercial bank and a chartered trust company with a combined network of five branches across New York City, Washington D.C., and San Francisco, and a commercial office in Boston. Amalgamated Bank was formed in 1923 as Amalgamated Bank of New York by the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, one of the country’s oldest labor unions. Amalgamated Bank provides commercial banking and trust services nationally and offers a full range of products and services to both commercial and retail customers. Amalgamated Bank is a proud member of the Global Alliance for Banking on Values and is a certified B Corporation®. As of March 31, 2025, total assets were $8.3 billion, total net loans were $4.6 billion, and total deposits were $7.4 billion. Additionally, as of March 31, 2025, the trust business held $35.7 billion in assets under custody and $14.2 billion in assets under management.

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    This release (and the accompanying financial information and tables) refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures including, without limitation, “Core operating revenue,” “Core non-interest expense,” “Core non-interest income,” “Core net income,” “Tangible common equity,” “Average tangible common equity,” “Core return on average assets,” “Core return on average tangible common equity,” and “Core efficiency ratio.”

    Management utilizes this information to compare operating performance for March 31, 2025 versus certain periods in 2024 and to prepare internal projections. The Company believes these non-GAAP financial measures facilitate making period-to-period comparisons and are meaningful indications of operating performance. In addition, because intangible assets such as goodwill and other discrete items unrelated to core business, which are excluded, vary extensively from company to company, the Company believe that the presentation of this information allows investors to more easily compare results to those of other companies.

    The presentation of non-GAAP financial information, however, is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for GAAP financial measures. The Company strongly encourage readers to review the GAAP financial measures included in this release and not to place undue reliance upon any single financial measure. In addition, because non-GAAP financial measures are not standardized, it may not be possible to compare the non-GAAP financial measures presented in this release with other companies’ non-GAAP financial measures having the same or similar names. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial disclosures to comparable GAAP measures found in this release are set forth in the final pages of this release and also may be viewed on the Company’s website, amalgamatedbank.com.

    Terminology

    Certain terms used in this release are defined as follows:

    “Core efficiency ratio” is defined as “Core non-interest expense” divided by “Core operating revenue.” The Company believes the most directly comparable performance ratio derived from GAAP financial measures is an efficiency ratio calculated by dividing total non-interest expense by the sum of net interest income and total non-interest income.

    “Core net income” is defined as net income after tax excluding gains and losses on sales of securities, ICS One-Way Sell fee income, changes in fair value on loans held-for-sale, gains on the sale of owned property, costs related to branch closures, restructuring/severance costs, acquisition costs, tax credits and accelerated depreciation on solar equity investments, and taxes on notable pre-tax items. The Company believes the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is net income.

    “Core non-interest expense” is defined as total non-interest expense excluding costs related to branch closures, and restructuring/severance. The Company believes the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is total non-interest expense.

    “Core non-interest income” is defined as total non-interest income excluding gains and losses on sales of securities, ICS One-Way Sell fee income, changes in fair value on loans held-for-sale, gains on the sale of owned property, and tax credits and accelerated depreciation on solar equity investments. The Company believes the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is non-interest income.

    “Core operating revenue” is defined as total net interest income plus “core non-interest income”. The Company believes the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is the total of net interest income and non-interest income.

    “Core return on average assets” is defined as “Core net income” divided by average total assets. The Company believes the most directly comparable performance ratio derived from GAAP financial measures is return on average assets calculated by dividing net income by average total assets.

    “Core return on average tangible common equity” is defined as “Core net income” divided by average “tangible common equity.” The Company believes the most directly comparable performance ratio derived from GAAP financial measures is return on average equity calculated by dividing net income by average total stockholders’ equity.

    “Super-core deposits” are defined as total deposits from commercial and consumer customers, with a relationship length of greater than 5 years. The Company believes the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is total deposits.

    “Tangible assets” are defined as total assets excluding, as applicable, goodwill and core deposit intangibles. The Company believes the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is total assets.

    “Tangible common equity”, and “Tangible book value” are defined as stockholders’ equity excluding, as applicable, minority interests, goodwill and core deposit intangibles. The Company believes that the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is total stockholders’ equity.

    “Traditional securities portfolio” is defined as total investment securities excluding PACE assessments. The Company believes the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is total investment securities.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    Statements included in this release that are not historical in nature are intended to be, and are hereby identified as, forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified through the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “aspire,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “expect,” “estimate,” “continue,” “in the future,” “may” and “intend,” as well as other similar words and expressions of the future. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, any or all of which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to:

    1. uncertain conditions in the banking industry and in national, regional and local economies in core markets, which may have an adverse impact on business, operations and financial performance;
    2. deterioration in the financial condition of borrowers resulting in significant increases in credit losses and provisions for those losses;
    3. deposit outflows and subsequent declines in liquidity caused by factors that could include lack of confidence in the banking system, a deterioration in market conditions or the financial condition of depositors;
    4. changes in deposits, including an increase in uninsured deposits;
    5. ability to maintain sufficient liquidity to meet deposit and debt obligations as they come due, which may require that the Company sell investment securities at a loss, negatively impacting net income, earnings and capital;
    6. unfavorable conditions in the capital markets, which may cause declines in stock price and the value of investments;
    7. negative economic and political conditions that adversely affect the general economy, housing prices, the real estate market, the job market, consumer confidence, the financial condition of borrowers and consumer spending habits, which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing assets, charge-offs and provision expense;
    8. fluctuations or unanticipated changes in the interest rate environment including changes in net interest margin or changes in the yield curve that affect investments, loans or deposits;
    9. the general decline in the real estate and lending markets, particularly in commercial real estate in the Company’s market areas, and the effects of the enactment of or changes to rent-control and other similar regulations on multi-family housing;
    10. potential implementation by the current presidential administration of a regulatory reform agenda that is significantly different from that of the prior presidential administration, impacting the rule making, supervision, examination and enforcement of the banking regulation agencies;
    11. changes in U.S. trade policies and other global political factors beyond the Company’s control, including the imposition of tariffs, which raise economic uncertainty, potentially leading to slower growth and a decrease in loan demand;
    12. the outcome of legal or regulatory proceedings that may be instituted against us;
    13. inability to achieve organic loan and deposit growth and the composition of that growth;
    14. composition of the Company’s loan portfolio, including any concentration in industries or sectors that may experience unanticipated or anticipated adverse conditions greater than other industries or sectors in the national or local economies in which the Company operates;
    15. inaccuracy of the assumptions and estimates the Company makes and policies that the Company implements in establishing the allowance for credit losses;
    16. changes in loan underwriting, credit review or loss reserve policies associated with economic conditions, examination conclusions, or regulatory developments;
    17. any matter that would cause the Company to conclude that there was impairment of any asset, including intangible assets;
    18. limitations on the ability to declare and pay dividends;
    19. the impact of competition with other financial institutions, including pricing pressures and the resulting impact on results, including as a result of compression to net interest margin;
    20. increased competition for experienced members of the workforce including executives in the banking industry;
    21. a failure in or breach of operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of third party vendors or other service providers, including as a result of unauthorized access, computer viruses, phishing schemes, spam attacks, human error, natural disasters, power loss and other security breaches;
    22. increased regulatory scrutiny and exposure from the use of “big data” techniques, machine learning, and artificial intelligence;
    23. a downgrade in the Company’s credit rating;
    24. “greenwashing claims” against the Company and environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) products and increased scrutiny and political opposition to ESG and diversity, equity, and inclusion (“DEI”) practices;
    25. any unanticipated or greater than anticipated adverse conditions (including the possibility of earthquakes, wildfires, and other natural disasters) affecting the markets in which the Company operates;
    26. physical and transitional risks related to climate change as they impact the business and the businesses that the Company finances;
    27. future repurchase of the Company’s shares through the Company’s common stock repurchase program; and
    28. descriptions of assumptions underlying or relating to any of the foregoing.

    Additional factors which could affect the forward-looking statements can be found in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC and available on the SEC’s website at https://www.sec.gov/. The Company disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this release, which speak only as of the date hereof, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

    Investor Contact:
    Jamie Lillis
    Solebury Strategic Communications
    shareholderrelations@amalgamatedbank.com
    800-895-4172

    Consolidated Statements of Income (unaudited)
      Three Months Ended
      March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
    ($ in thousands)   2025       2024       2024  
    INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME          
    Loans $ 57,843     $ 58,024     $ 51,952  
    Securities   41,653       43,448       42,390  
    Interest-bearing deposits in banks   1,194       1,113       2,592  
    Total interest and dividend income   100,690       102,585       96,934  
    INTEREST EXPENSE          
    Deposits   28,917       28,582       25,891  
    Borrowed funds   1,196       908       3,006  
    Total interest expense   30,113       29,490       28,897  
    NET INTEREST INCOME   70,577       73,095       68,037  
    Provision for credit losses   596       3,686       1,588  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   69,981       69,409       66,449  
    NON-INTEREST INCOME          
    Trust Department fees   4,191       3,971       3,854  
    Service charges on deposit accounts   3,438       5,337       6,136  
    Bank-owned life insurance income   626       661       609  
    Losses on sale of securities   (680 )     (1,003 )     (2,774 )
    Gain (loss) on sale of loans and changes in fair value on loans held-for-sale, net   832       (4,090 )     47  
    Equity method investments income (loss)   (2,508 )     (529 )     2,072  
    Other income   507       442       285  
    Total non-interest income   6,406       4,789       10,229  
    NON-INTEREST EXPENSE          
    Compensation and employee benefits   23,314       24,691       22,273  
    Occupancy and depreciation   3,293       3,376       2,904  
    Professional fees   4,739       2,674       2,376  
    Technology   5,619       5,299       4,629  
    Office maintenance and depreciation   629       578       663  
    Amortization of intangible assets   144       183       183  
    Advertising and promotion   51       314       1,219  
    Federal deposit insurance premiums   900       715       1,050  
    Other expense   2,961       3,313       2,855  
    Total non-interest expense   41,650       41,143       38,152  
    Income before income taxes   34,737       33,055       38,526  
    Income tax expense   9,709       8,564       11,277  
    Net income $ 25,028     $ 24,491     $ 27,249  
    Earnings per common share – basic $ 0.82     $ 0.80     $ 0.89  
    Earnings per common share – diluted $ 0.81     $ 0.79     $ 0.89  
    Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

    ($ in thousands) March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    Assets (unaudited)       (unaudited)
    Cash and due from banks $ 4,196     $ 4,042     $ 3,830  
    Interest-bearing deposits in banks   61,518       56,707       151,374  
    Total cash and cash equivalents   65,714       60,749       155,204  
    Securities:          
    Available for sale, at fair value          
    Traditional securities   1,546,127       1,477,047       1,445,793  
    Property Assessed Clean Energy (“PACE”) assessments   161,147       152,011       82,258  
        1,707,274       1,629,058       1,528,051  
    Held-to-maturity, at amortized cost:          
    Traditional securities, net of allowance for credit losses of $47, $49, and $53, respectively   535,065       542,246       616,172  
    PACE assessments, net of allowance for credit losses of $654, $655, and $657, respectively   1,038,052       1,043,959       1,057,790  
        1,573,117       1,586,205       1,673,962  
               
    Loans held for sale   3,667       37,593       2,137  
    Loans receivable, net of deferred loan origination costs   4,677,506       4,672,924       4,423,780  
    Allowance for credit losses   (57,676 )     (60,086 )     (64,400 )
    Loans receivable, net   4,619,830       4,612,838       4,359,380  
               
    Resell agreements   41,651       23,741       131,242  
    Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLBNY”) stock, at cost   4,679       15,693       4,603  
    Accrued interest receivable   55,092       61,172       53,436  
    Premises and equipment, net   7,366       6,386       7,128  
    Bank-owned life insurance   108,652       108,026       106,137  
    Right-of-use lease asset   12,477       14,231       19,797  
    Deferred tax asset, net   33,799       42,437       49,171  
    Goodwill   12,936       12,936       12,936  
    Intangible assets, net   1,343       1,487       2,034  
    Equity method investments   5,639       8,482       14,801  
    Other assets   31,991       35,858       16,663  
    Total assets $ 8,285,227     $ 8,256,892     $ 8,136,682  
    Liabilities          
    Deposits $ 7,412,072     $ 7,180,605     $ 7,305,765  
    Borrowings   69,676       314,409       139,705  
    Operating leases   17,190       19,734       27,250  
    Other liabilities   50,293       34,490       47,024  
    Total liabilities   7,549,231       7,549,238       7,519,744  
    Stockholders’ equity          
    Common stock, par value $0.01 per share   309       308       307  
    Additional paid-in capital   288,539       288,656       287,198  
    Retained earnings   500,783       480,144       412,190  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes   (47,308 )     (58,637 )     (78,872 )
    Treasury stock, at cost   (6,327 )     (2,817 )     (4,018 )
    Total Amalgamated Financial Corp. stockholders’ equity   735,996       707,654       616,805  
    Noncontrolling interests               133  
    Total stockholders’ equity   735,996       707,654       616,938  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 8,285,227     $ 8,256,892     $ 8,136,682  
               
    Select Financial Data
      As of and for the
      Three Months Ended
      March 31,   December 31,   March 31,
    (Shares in thousands)   2025     2024     2024
    Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:          
    Earnings per share          
    Basic $ 0.82   $ 0.80   $ 0.89
    Diluted   0.81     0.79     0.89
    Core net income (non-GAAP)          
    Basic $ 0.88   $ 0.91   $ 0.84
    Diluted   0.88     0.90     0.83
    Book value per common share (excluding minority interest) $ 23.98   $ 23.07   $ 20.22
    Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP) $ 23.51   $ 22.60   $ 19.73
    Common shares outstanding, par value $0.01 per share(1)   30,697     30,671     30,510
    Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic   30,682     30,677     30,476
    Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted   30,946     30,976     30,737
               
    (1) 70,000,000 shares authorized; 30,940,480, 30,809,484, and 30,736,141 shares issued for the periods ended March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2024 respectively, and 30,696,940, 30,670,982, and 30,510,393 shares outstanding for the periods ended March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2024, respectively.
    Select Financial Data
      As of and for the   As of and for the
      Three Months Ended   Three Months Ended
      March 31,   December
    31,
      March 31,   March 31,
      2025     2024     2024     2025     2024  
    Selected Performance Metrics:                  
    Return on average assets 1.22 %   1.17 %   1.36 %   1.22 %   1.36 %
    Core return on average assets (non-GAAP) 1.33 %   1.34 %   1.27 %   1.33 %   1.27 %
    Return on average equity 14.05 %   13.83 %   18.24 %   14.05 %   18.24 %
    Core return on average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) 15.54 %   16.13 %   17.59 %   15.54 %   17.59 %
    Average equity to average assets 8.71 %   8.48 %   7.44 %   8.71 %   7.44 %
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP) 8.73 %   8.41 %   7.41 %   8.73 %   7.41 %
    Loan yield 5.00 %   5.00 %   4.76 %   5.00 %   4.76 %
    Securities yield 5.15 %   5.12 %   5.21 %   5.15 %   5.21 %
    Deposit cost 1.59 %   1.53 %   1.46 %   1.59 %   1.46 %
    Net interest margin 3.55 %   3.59 %   3.49 %   3.55 %   3.49 %
    Efficiency ratio(1) 54.10 %   52.83 %   48.75 %   54.10 %   48.75 %
    Core efficiency ratio (non-GAAP) 52.11 %   49.82 %   50.40 %   52.11 %   50.40 %
                       
    Asset Quality Ratios:                  
    Nonaccrual loans to total loans 0.70 %   0.45 %   0.75 %   0.70 %   0.75 %
    Nonperforming assets to total assets 0.41 %   0.31 %   0.42 %   0.41 %   0.42 %
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to nonaccrual loans 175.07 %   286.00 %   195.04 %   175.07 %   195.04 %
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans 1.23 %   1.29 %   1.46 %   1.23 %   1.46 %
    Annualized net charge-offs to average loans 0.22 %   0.36 %   0.20 %   0.22 %   0.20 %
                       
    Capital Ratios:                  
    Tier 1 leverage capital ratio 9.22 %   9.00 %   8.29 %   9.22 %   8.29 %
    Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio 14.27 %   13.90 %   13.68 %   14.27 %   13.68 %
    Total risk-based capital ratio 16.61 %   16.26 %   16.35 %   16.61 %   16.35 %
    Common equity tier 1 capital ratio 14.27 %   13.90 %   13.68 %   14.27 %   13.68 %
                       
    (1)Efficiency ratio is calculated by dividing total non-interest expense by the sum of net interest income and total non-interest income
    Loan and PACE Assessments Portfolio Composition


    (In thousands) At March 31, 2025   At December 31, 2024   At March 31, 2024
      Amount   % of total   Amount   % of total   Amount   % of total
    Commercial portfolio:                      
    Commercial and industrial $ 1,183,297     25.3 %   $ 1,175,490     25.2 %   $ 1,014,084     22.9 %
    Multifamily   1,371,950     29.3 %     1,351,604     28.9 %     1,175,467     26.6 %
    Commercial real estate   409,004     8.7 %     411,387     8.8 %     353,598     8.0 %
    Construction and land development   20,690     0.4 %     20,683     0.4 %     23,266     0.5 %
    Total commercial portfolio   2,984,941     63.8 %     2,959,164     63.3 %     2,566,415     58.0 %
                           
    Retail portfolio:                      
    Residential real estate lending   1,303,856     27.9 %     1,313,617     28.1 %     1,419,321     32.1 %
    Consumer solar   356,601     7.6 %     365,516     7.8 %     398,501     9.0 %
    Consumer and other   32,108     0.7 %     34,627     0.8 %     39,543     0.9 %
    Total retail portfolio   1,692,565     36.2 %     1,713,760     36.7 %     1,857,365     42.0 %
    Total loans held for investment   4,677,506     100.0 %     4,672,924     100.0 %     4,423,780     100.0 %
                           
    Allowance for credit losses   (57,676 )         (60,086 )         (64,400 )    
    Loans receivable, net $ 4,619,830         $ 4,612,838         $ 4,359,380      
                           
    PACE assessments:                      
    Available for sale, at fair value                      
    Residential PACE assessments   161,147     13.4 %     152,011     12.7 %     82,258     7.2 %
                           
    Held-to-maturity, at amortized cost                      
    Commercial PACE assessments   271,200     22.6 %     268,692     22.5 %     256,661     22.5 %
    Residential PACE assessments   767,507     64.0 %     775,922     64.8 %     801,786     70.3 %
    Total Held-to-maturity PACE assessments   1,038,707     86.6 %     1,044,614     87.3 %     1,058,447     92.8 %
    Total PACE assessments   1,199,854     100.0 %     1,196,625     100.0 %     1,140,705     100.0 %
                           
    Allowance for credit losses   (654 )         (655 )         (657 )    
    Total PACE assessments, net $ 1,199,200         $ 1,195,970         $ 1,140,048      
                           
                           
    Loans receivable, net and total PACE assessments, net as a % of Deposits   78.5 %         80.9 %         75.3 %    
    Loans receivable, net and total PACE assessments, net as a % of Deposits excluding Brokered CDs   78.5 %         80.9 %         77.0 %    
    Net Interest Income Analysis
      Three Months Ended
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    (In thousands) Average
    Balance
    Income / Expense Yield /
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income / Expense Yield /
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income / Expense Yield /
    Rate
                                       
    Interest-earning assets:                                  
    Interest-bearing deposits in banks $ 121,321   $ 1,194   3.99 %   $ 105,958   $ 1,113   4.18 %   $ 205,369   $ 2,592   5.08 %
    Securities(1)   3,220,590     40,867   5.15 %     3,313,349     42,632   5.12 %     3,170,356     41,064   5.21 %
    Resell agreements   30,169     786   10.57 %     50,938     816   6.37 %     79,011     1,326   6.75 %
    Loans receivable, net(2)   4,695,264     57,843   5.00 %     4,619,723     58,024   5.00 %     4,390,489     51,952   4.76 %
    Total interest-earning assets   8,067,344     100,690   5.06 %     8,089,968     102,585   5.04 %     7,845,225     96,934   4.97 %
    Non-interest-earning assets:                                  
    Cash and due from banks   5,045             6,291             5,068        
    Other assets   220,589             214,868             226,270        
    Total assets $ 8,292,978           $ 8,311,127           $ 8,076,563        
                                       
    Interest-bearing liabilities:                                  
    Savings, NOW and money market deposits $ 4,242,786   $ 26,806   2.56 %   $ 3,971,128   $ 26,329   2.64 %   $ 3,591,551   $ 21,872   2.45 %
    Time deposits   232,683     2,111   3.68 %     220,205     2,085   3.77 %     188,045     1,576   3.37 %
    Brokered CDs         0.00 %     11,822     169   5.69 %     190,240     2,443   5.16 %
    Total interest-bearing deposits   4,475,469     28,917   2.62 %     4,203,155     28,583   2.71 %     3,969,836     25,891   2.62 %
    Borrowings   134,340     1,196   3.61 %     98,768     908   3.66 %     288,093     3,006   4.20 %
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   4,609,809     30,113   2.65 %     4,301,923     29,491   2.73 %     4,257,929     28,897   2.73 %
    Non-interest-bearing liabilities:                                  
    Demand and transaction deposits   2,901,061             3,239,251             3,138,238        
    Other liabilities   59,728             65,580             79,637        
    Total liabilities   7,570,598             7,606,754             7,475,804        
    Stockholders’ equity   722,380             704,373             600,759        
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 8,292,978           $ 8,311,127           $ 8,076,563        
                                       
    Net interest income / interest rate spread     $ 70,577   2.41 %       $ 73,094   2.31 %       $ 68,037   2.24 %
    Net interest-earning assets / net interest margin $ 3,457,535       3.55 %   $ 3,788,045       3.59 %   $ 3,587,296       3.49 %
                                       
    Total deposits excluding Brokered CDs / total cost of deposits excluding Brokered CDs $ 7,376,530       1.59 %   $ 7,430,584       1.52 %   $ 6,917,834       1.36 %
    Total deposits / total cost of deposits $ 7,376,530       1.59 %   $ 7,442,406       1.53 %   $ 7,108,074       1.46 %
    Total funding / total cost of funds $ 7,510,870       1.63 %   $ 7,541,174       1.56 %   $ 7,396,167       1.57 %

    (1) Includes Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock in the average balance, and dividend income on FHLB stock in interest income.
    (2) Includes prepayment penalty interest income in 1Q2025, 4Q2024, or 1Q2024 of $0, $121, and $18, respectively (in thousands).

    Deposit Portfolio Composition
      Three Months Ended
    (In thousands) March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
      Ending
    Balance
      Average
    Balance
      Ending
    Balance
      Average
    Balance
      Ending
    Balance
      Average
    Balance
    Non-interest-bearing demand deposit accounts $ 2,895,757   $ 2,901,061   $ 2,868,506   $ 3,239,251   $ 3,182,047   $ 3,138,238
    NOW accounts   187,078     177,827     179,765     174,963     200,900     197,659
    Money market deposit accounts   3,772,423     3,739,548     3,564,423     3,471,242     3,222,271     3,051,670
    Savings accounts   330,410     325,411     328,696     324,922     341,054     342,222
    Time deposits   226,404     232,683     239,215     220,205     197,265     188,045
    Brokered certificates of deposit (“CDs”)               11,822     162,228     190,240
    Total deposits $ 7,412,072   $ 7,376,530   $ 7,180,605   $ 7,442,405   $ 7,305,765   $ 7,108,074
                           
    Total deposits excluding Brokered CDs $ 7,412,072   $ 7,376,530   $ 7,180,605   $ 7,430,583   $ 7,143,537   $ 6,917,834
      Three Months Ended
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    (In thousands) Average
    Rate
    Paid
    (1)
      Cost of
    Funds
      Average
    Rate
    Paid
    (1)
      Cost of
    Funds
      Average
    Rate
    Paid
    (1)
      Cost of
    Funds
                           
    Non-interest bearing demand deposit accounts 0.00 %   0.00 %   0.00 %   0.00 %   0.00 %   0.00 %
    NOW accounts 0.72 %   0.70 %   0.72 %   0.81 %   1.05 %   1.03 %
    Money market deposit accounts 2.73 %   2.76 %   2.67 %   2.85 %   2.96 %   2.67 %
    Savings accounts 1.28 %   1.28 %   1.32 %   1.37 %   1.34 %   1.29 %
    Time deposits 3.52 %   3.68 %   3.54 %   3.77 %   3.44 %   3.37 %
    Brokered CDs %   %   %   5.69 %   4.99 %   5.16 %
    Total deposits 1.57 %   1.59 %   1.52 %   1.53 %   1.60 %   1.46 %
                           
    Interest-bearing deposits excluding Brokered CDs 2.58 %   2.62 %   2.54 %   2.70 %   2.75 %   2.50 %

    (1) Average rate paid is calculated as the weighted average of spot rates on deposit accounts. Off-balance sheet deposits are excluded from all calculations shown.

    Asset Quality


    (In thousands) March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    Loans 90 days past due and accruing $   $   $
    Nonaccrual loans held for sale   989     4,853     989
    Nonaccrual loans – Commercial   27,872     16,041     24,228
    Nonaccrual loans – Retail   5,072     4,968     8,791
    Nonaccrual securities   7     8     31
    Total nonperforming assets $ 33,940   $ 25,870   $ 34,039
               
    Nonaccrual loans:          
    Commercial and industrial $ 12,786   $ 872   $ 8,750
    Commercial real estate   3,979     4,062     4,354
    Construction and land development   11,107     11,107     11,124
    Total commercial portfolio   27,872     16,041     24,228
               
    Residential real estate lending   1,375     1,771     4,763
    Consumer solar   3,479     2,827     3,852
    Consumer and other   218     370     176
    Total retail portfolio   5,072     4,968     8,791
    Total nonaccrual loans $ 32,944   $ 21,009   $ 33,019
               
    Credit Quality

      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    ($ in thousands)          
    Criticized and classified loans          
    Commercial and industrial $ 55,157   $ 62,614   $ 62,242
    Multifamily   8,540     8,573     10,274
    Commercial real estate   3,979     4,062     8,475
    Construction and land development   11,107     11,107     11,124
    Residential real estate lending   1,375     6,387     4,763
    Consumer solar   3,479     2,827     3,852
    Consumer and other   218     370     176
    Total loans $ 83,855   $ 95,940   $ 100,906
    Criticized and classified loans to total loans          
    Commercial and industrial 1.18 %   1.34 %   1.41 %
    Multifamily 0.18 %   0.18 %   0.23 %
    Commercial real estate 0.09 %   0.09 %   0.19 %
    Construction and land development 0.24 %   0.24 %   0.25 %
    Residential real estate lending 0.03 %   0.14 %   0.11 %
    Consumer solar 0.07 %   0.06 %   0.09 %
    Consumer and other %   0.01 %   0.01 %
    Total loans 1.79 %   2.06 %   2.29 %
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
      Annualized
    net charge-
    offs
    (recoveries)
    to average
    loans
      ACL to total portfolio balance   Annualized
    net charge-
    offs
    (recoveries)
    to average
    loans
      ACL to total portfolio balance   Annualized
    net charge-
    offs
    (recoveries)
    to average
    loans
      ACL to total portfolio
    balance
    Commercial and industrial 0.28 %   1.29 %   0.53 %   1.15 %   0.16 %   1.58 %
    Multifamily %   0.23 %   0.15 %   0.21 %   %   0.38 %
    Commercial real estate %   0.39 %   %   0.39 %   %   0.40 %
    Construction and land development %   6.05 %   (7.19) %   6.06 %   %   3.67 %
    Residential real estate lending %   0.73 %   0.28 %   0.71 %   %   0.87 %
    Consumer solar 1.90 %   7.01 %   1.71 %   7.96 %   1.67 %   6.72 %
    Consumer and other 0.70 %   5.67 %   0.86 %   6.83 %   0.86 %   6.36 %
    Total loans 0.22 %   1.23 %   0.36 %   1.29 %   0.20 %   1.46 %
    Reconciliation of GAAP to Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    The information provided below presents a reconciliation of each of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly
    comparable GAAP financial measure.
      As of and for the
      Three Months Ended
    (in thousands) March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    Core operating revenue          
    Net Interest Income (GAAP) $ 70,577     $ 73,095     $ 68,037  
    Non-interest income (GAAP)   6,406       4,789       10,229  
    Add: Securities loss   680       1,003       2,774  
    Less: ICS One-Way Sell Fee Income(1)   (9 )     (1,347 )     (2,903 )
    Less: Changes in fair value of loans held-for-sale(6)   (837 )     4,117        
    Add: Tax (credits) depreciation on solar investments(3)   2,868       920       (1,808 )
    Core operating revenue (non-GAAP) $ 79,685     $ 82,577     $ 76,329  
               
    Core non-interest expense          
    Non-interest expense (GAAP) $ 41,650     $ 41,143     $ 38,152  
    Add: Gain on settlement of lease termination(4)               499  
    Less: Severance costs(5)   (125 )     (1 )     (184 )
    Core non-interest expense (non-GAAP) $ 41,525     $ 41,142     $ 38,467  
               
    Core net income          
    Net Income (GAAP) $ 25,028     $ 24,491     $ 27,249  
    Add: Securities loss   680       1,003       2,774  
    Less: ICS One-Way Sell Fee Income(1)   (9 )     (1,347 )     (2,903 )
    Less: Changes in fair value of loans held-for-sale(6)   (837 )     4,117        
    Less: Gain on settlement of lease termination(4)               (499 )
    Add: Severance costs(5)   125       1       184  
    Add: Tax (credits) depreciation on solar investments(3)   2,868       920       (1,808 )
    Less: Tax on notable items   (731 )     (1,217 )     607  
    Core net income (non-GAAP) $ 27,124     $ 27,968     $ 25,604  
               
    Tangible common equity          
    Stockholders’ equity (GAAP) $ 735,996     $ 707,654     $ 616,938  
    Less: Minority interest               (133 )
    Less: Goodwill   (12,936 )     (12,936 )     (12,936 )
    Less: Core deposit intangible   (1,343 )     (1,487 )     (2,034 )
    Tangible common equity (non-GAAP) $ 721,717     $ 693,231     $ 601,835  
               
    Average tangible common equity          
    Average stockholders’ equity (GAAP) $ 722,380     $ 704,373     $ 600,759  
    Less: Minority interest         (132 )     (133 )
    Less: Goodwill   (12,936 )     (12,936 )     (12,936 )
    Less: Core deposit intangible   (1,413 )     (1,575 )     (2,123 )
    Average tangible common equity (non-GAAP) $ 708,031     $ 689,730     $ 585,567  

    (1) Included in service charges on deposit accounts in the Consolidated Statements of Income
    (2) Included in other income in the Consolidated Statements of Income
    (3) Included in equity method investments income in the Consolidated Statements of Income
    (4) Included in occupancy and depreciation in the Consolidated Statements of Income
    (5) Included in compensation and employee benefits in the Consolidated Statements of Income
    (6) Included in changes in fair value of loans held-for-sale in the Consolidated Statements of Income

    1 Definitions are presented under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”. Reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measure are set forth on the last page of the financial information accompanying this press release and may also be found on the Company’s website, www.amalgamatedbank.com.

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Africa: Moore Global Partners with U.S.-Africa Energy Forum (USAEF) to Advance Critical Minerals Investment in Africa

    Source: Africa Press Organisation – English (2) – Report:

    HOUSTON, United States, April 24, 2025/APO Group/ —

    The U.S.-Africa Energy Forum (USAEF) is pleased to announce a strategic partnership with Moore Global, a leading global accounting, audit and advisory network, to drive investment and collaboration in Africa’s energy sector, with a focus on critical minerals. This partnership underscores the growing significance of Africa’s mineral resources in supporting global energy transitions and securing supply chains for key industries, including oil and gas, renewables and battery technologies.

    Moore Global brings decades of expertise in financial advisory, investment facilitation and strategic consulting across key markets, including Africa. With a strong presence in the region, the firm has played a pivotal role in guiding energy and natural resource investments, helping stakeholders navigate regulatory environments and optimizing project financing. Given Africa’s vast reserves of critical minerals essential for clean energy and industrial applications – estimated to hold approximately 30% of the world’s proven volumes – Moore Global’s involvement in USAEF will enhance discussions on sustainable extraction, value chain development and the continent’s positioning in global markets.

    As part of the forum, Moore Global will lead a dedicated private equity session on financing African energy projects, featuring in-depth discussions on deal structuring, risk mitigation and capital deployment. As a premier platform for U.S.-Africa energy cooperation, USAEF brings together investors, policymakers and industry leaders to catalyze deals and partnerships across the energy value chain. Through this collaboration, Moore Global will provide thought leadership, financial expertise and strategic insights – reinforcing USAEF’s mission to accelerate investment in Africa’s oil, gas and critical minerals sectors. With energy security and resource independence high on the global agenda, the partnership aims to shape impactful investment strategies and policy frameworks that support Africa’s long-term growth.

    “We are delighted to be a key part of this forum. Our global expertise, coupled with our sector knowledge and global relationships, means we can add real value to these conversations and ongoing energy projects. Moore has a wealth of knowledge and insight to share, and I look forward to working closely with all of those involved,” said Candice Czeremuskin, Moore Global Leader, Private Equity.

    “Moore Global’s partnership with USAEF marks a crucial step in advancing Africa’s energy and critical minerals sectors. With their deep understanding of financial structures and investment landscapes, they bring valuable expertise that will help bridge the gap between African resource holders and global capital markets. We look forward to working together to drive meaningful engagement and sustainable investment in Africa’s future,” said James Chester, CEO,  Energy Capital & Power.

    For tickets, sponsorship opportunities and more information, please contact sales@energycapitalpower.com. Join us in Houston this August to connect with the leaders shaping Africa’s energy landscape and experience the momentum that drives ECP’s events worldwide.

    MIL OSI Africa

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Rosneft organized a motor rally through the cities of Western Siberia in honor of the 80th anniversary of the Victory

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Rosneft – Rosneft – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Employees of Rosneft subsidiaries operating in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug and Tyumen Oblast organized a motor rally in honor of the 80th anniversary of Victory. Cars decorated with the Victory Banner covered 1,418 km – this distance corresponds to the number of days that the Great Patriotic War lasted.

    The patriotic action started in Novy Urengoy (Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Area), the gas capital of Russia, where one of the key gas assets of the ROSPAN INTERNATIONAL Company is based. At the Memory Square, participants laid flowers at the Eternal Flame and unfurled a huge St. George ribbon. Participants of the Energy of Talents festival and students of Rosneft classes performed the legendary song Katyusha. Then a column of domestic cars headed to the city of Gubkinsky, starting the rally.

    In Gubkinsky (YaNAO), RN-Purneftegaz, which built the settlement, and SevKomNeftegaz, carry out their production activities. Together with the participants of the motor rally, employees of these Societies, students of Rosneft-classes, as well as representatives of the Movement of the First and the public organization Veteran walked along the central street to the Eternal Flame, where they honored the memory of the heroes with a minute of silence.

    The third city on the rally route was Nefteyugansk (Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug), where Rosneft’s largest production asset, RN-Yuganskneftegaz, operates. The rally participants brought the Victory Banner to the Liberator Warrior Monument, one of the oldest memorials in the city, where flowers were laid.

    Having overcome the final stage of the route, the motor rally ended in the capital of the Tyumen region. Accompanied by songs of the war years, a motorcade drove through the streets of Tyumen, led by retro cars and motorcycles decorated with symbols of the 80th anniversary of the Victory. The participants of the event were met at the Memory Square by veterans, as well as employees of Tyumenneftegaz, Kharampurneftegaz, RN-Uvatneftegaz and the corporate scientific institute. Those gathered honored the memory of the heroes of the Great Patriotic War with a minute of silence and laid flowers at the Eternal Flame.

    Department of Information and Advertising of PJSC NK Rosneft April 24, 2025

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Energy Resources Aotearoa Welcomes New Industry-Led Work-based Learning Model

    Source: Energy Resources Aotearoa

    Energy Resources Aotearoa has welcomed Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds’ announcement today confirming the introduction of an independent, industry-led model for work-based learning from 1 January 2026.
    John Carnegie, Chief Executive of Energy Resources Aotearoa, says the announcement reflects strong industry feedback and is a positive step forward for vocational education in New Zealand.
    “It’s great to see the Government listening to industry and confirming the ‘independent learning model’ that we and others have strongly advocated for,” says Carnegie. “This approach recognises the importance of relevant, fit-for-purpose training that meets the real needs of employers and learners.”
    Carnegie says the energy sector, in particular, has faced challenges under the current system.
    “In the past, the energy industry has had to work across two different standard-setting bodies, creating fragmentation and inefficiencies.
    We would like to see a cohesive Industry Skills Board representing the broad energy sector to ensure consistency and coordination across our workforce needs. This is especially important given the skills deficit and the particular challenges the sector faces to deliver secure, reliable and affordable energy to households and businesses.”
    Carnegie says the timeframe is tight, but the 2026 start date provides some runway to prepare for the transition.
    “We acknowledge that the timeframe is ambitious, but we also appreciate the clarity that changes will take effect from January 2026. This allows industry and training providers to plan for a smooth shift.”
    Carnegie also highlights the need for more detail on implementation.
    “We would like to see more detail on how the Industry Skills Boards will be appointed and when this process will begin. It’s also important that we get clarity around the structure of these boards, particularly which industries will fall under which board, and how those decisions will be made.
    This is especially important given the skills deficit and the particular challenges the sector now faces to deliver secure, reliable and affordable energy to households and businesses.”
    Energy Resources Aotearoa looks forward to working closely with Government to ensure the new model delivers high-quality, relevant training that supports a skilled workforce for the energy sector and beyond.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI NGOs: Toxic threat: New Greenpeace report outlines unacceptable risk of nuclear waste in Australia

    Source: Greenpeace Statement –

    SYDNEY, Thursday 24 April 2025 — A new report from Greenpeace Australia Pacific has shown the Coalition’s nuclear plan could produce 14 billion Coke cans’ worth of radioactive waste a year, warning it is a matter of when, not if, a nuclear waste accident could occur in Australia.

    Released in the lead-up to the 39th anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, the report, ‘Toxic threat: The danger of nuclear waste in Australia’ shows that the Coalition has grossly understated the volume of dangerous waste its nuclear plan will produce — 14 billion times more than the ‘single coke can’ for a small modular reactor touted by Peter Dutton.

    The report also outlines the unacceptable risk this waste poses to Australian communities, and warns Australia’s long history of nuclear waste management failures point to a very high likelihood of future nuclear disaster. 

    Joe Rafalowicz, Head of Climate and Energy at Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said: “Peter Dutton’s nuclear plan is a dangerous and expensive disaster waiting to happen. From Chernobyl to Fukushima, the devastation of nuclear disasters is a risk that Australia cannot afford to, and doesn’t need to, take. 

    “Australians don’t need the equivalent of 14 billion Coke cans of radioactive nuclear waste every year. The Coalition has not offered a credible plan for how it will manage nuclear waste safely, nor how it will fund this multibillion dollar effort. 

    “Australia’s unenviable track record of mismanaging even low-level nuclear waste, as well as a history of radioactive incidents in the US, UK and EU, reveals how complex it is to manage nuclear waste safely. Multiplying that challenge many times over by building a fleet of nuclear reactors could have devastating consequences for communities and ecosystems. 

    “International examples show that accidents, natural disasters, and other waste management failures occur with alarming regularity. A nuclear waste accident could lead to mass casualties, long-term health impacts, and the contamination of groundwater, farmland, and ecosystems for millennia. The clean-up bill from an incident would be astronomical, costing billions of dollars. 

    “Australia doesn’t need nuclear energy, which is just a smokescreen to prolong the use of climate-wrecking coal and gas for decades. We are almost halfway to powering the nation with clean, affordable wind and solar, and should be supercharging efforts to get to 100% renewables backed by storage.

    “The Coalition has not asked communities like Collie, Latrobe Valley and the Hunter Valley for their consent to build nuclear reactors and waste dumps in their backyards, but the upcoming Federal Election is a chance for voters to have a say in Australia’s energy future. Peter Dutton’s nuclear plan is too dangerous to proceed, and Australians should strongly reject the idea of nuclear energy here.” 

    —ENDS—

    Note to editors: Images of a recent Greenpeace anti-nuclear protest at the Coalition’s election campaign launch party are available here

    For more information or to arrange an interview, please contact Vai Shah on 0452 290 082 / [email protected]

    MIL OSI NGO

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Applications are now being accepted for the II Competition for Young Scientists

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: State University of Management – Official website of the State –

    The Sistema Charitable Foundation and the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS) launched the 2nd Competition for Young Scientists, implemented within the framework of the Decade of Science and Technology with the support of the Federal Service for Intellectual Property (Rospatent) and a number of leading Russian technology companies.

    The competition is aimed at supporting applied innovative scientific developments and the latest research in priority sectors of the economy. Its goal is to promote the popularization of Russian science and education, and to create conditions for the development of students and young scientists in science-intensive areas.

    Citizens of the Russian Federation can take part in the Competition – one young scientist or a team of students and young scientists up to three people, presenting their scientific developments and research results in one of ten nominations:

    “Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Technologies”; “Hydrogen as the Basis of Green Energy”; “Digital Energy and Intelligent Systems”; “Genomic Technologies and Medicine of the Future”; “Bioinnovations: Technologies for Life”; “Space Exploration and Unmanned Systems: A Look into the Future”; “Microelectronics: From Chips to Smart Devices”; “The East is a Delicate Matter: Technological Breakthroughs in Asia”; “New Horizons in the Construction Industry”; “Chemical Technologies, Innovative Materials and Processes”.

    Applications for the Competition will be accepted on the Lift to the Future platform and will last until July 20, 2025. The names of the winners, selected based on the results of a two-stage examination, will be announced by November 1, 2025. The authors of the best innovative solutions and research results, in addition to funds, will receive information and expert support. The winners of the Competition in the “space” nomination will receive a special prize – their name will be sent into space on one of the satellites launched by the partner of the direction – Sputnix Group of Companies.

    Subscribe to the tg channel “Our State University” Announcement date: 04/24/2025

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI: Invitation to townhall meeting for shareholders

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Orrön Energy AB (“Orrön Energy” or “the Company”) is pleased to invite shareholders to a townhall meeting in Stockholm on Tuesday, 20 May at 18:30 CEST. 

    During the townhall, a presentation will be given by the Company’s CEO, Daniel Fitzgerald, and CFO, Espen Hennie, outlining the Company’s performance, strategy, and future outlook. The townhall will offer shareholders the opportunity to meet and ask questions to representatives of the Company’s Board of Directors and management team.

    More information and registration can be found on: www.orron.com/townhall2025

    For further information, please contact:

    Robert Eriksson
    Corporate Affairs and Investor Relations
    Tel: +46 701 11 26 15
    robert.eriksson@orron.com

    Jenny Sandström
    Communications Lead
    Tel: +41 79 431 63 68
    jenny.sandstrom@orron.com

    Orrön Energy is an independent, publicly listed (Nasdaq Stockholm: “ORRON”) renewable energy company within the Lundin Group of Companies. Orrön Energy’s core portfolio consists of high quality, cash flow generating assets in the Nordics, coupled with greenfield growth opportunities in the Nordics, the UK, Germany and France. With significant financial capacity to fund further growth and acquisitions, and backed by a major shareholder, management and Board with a proven track record of investing into, leading and growing highly successful businesses, Orrön Energy is in a unique position to create shareholder value through the energy transition.

    Forward-looking statements
    Statements in this press release relating to any future status or circumstances, including statements regarding future performance, growth and other trend projections, are forward-looking statements. These statements may generally, but not always, be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate”, “believe”, “expect”, “intend”, “plan”, “seek”, “will”, “would” or similar expressions. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that could occur in the future. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements due to several factors, many of which are outside the company’s control. Any forward-looking statements in this press release speak only as of the date on which the statements are made and the company has no obligation (and undertakes no obligation) to update or revise any of them, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

    Attachment

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI Russia: NSU held a telethon with colleagues from the National University of Uzbekistan

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: Novosibirsk State University – Novosibirsk State University –

    Novosibirsk State University held a telethon with colleagues from the National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek “Heroes of Science and the Front: Memory of Teachers and Scientists”, dedicated to the 80th anniversary of the Victory in the Great Patriotic War.

    The telethon was organized by partners in the Consortium of Researchers of the History of North and Central Asian Countries, the Humanitarian Institute of NSU and the Faculty of History of the Mirzo Ulugbek National University of Uzbekistan.

    Opening the meeting, Professor, Doctor of Historical Sciences Andrey Zuyev emphasized: “A lot of time has passed, but we must not forget about this, the most grandiose event of the 20th century for our history. Representatives of all peoples and social groups of the Soviet Union took part in the war. And our event is dedicated to preserving the memory of the teachers and scientists who contributed to the common Victory.”

    Professor of the National University of Uzbekistan, Doctor of Historical Sciences Akhmadjon Khalikulov, who spoke in response, shared the same point of view.

    The telethon program opened with a report by Academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Professor Vyacheslav Molodin, “Scientists of Siberia on the Front of the Great Patriotic War and in the Post-War Period,” which became the basis for a chapter in a collective monograph on this topic, prepared by the Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences.

    He recalled that during the war, many scientists were already working in Novosibirsk, where the Novosibirsk Committee of Scientists was created in early 1942, with Academician S.A. Chaplygin becoming its honorary chairman. A year later, a branch of the USSR Academy of Sciences was formed, consisting of the following institutes: Mining and Geology, Transport and Energy, Chemical and Metallurgical, and Medical and Biological.

    “Among the priority tasks facing the institutes of the Siberian branch of the Academy of Sciences was the use of natural resources of the Urals and Siberia in the interests of the country’s defense, since many sources of strategic raw materials ended up in enemy-occupied territories,” Molodin said. And, as the academician showed in his report, the geologists successfully coped with it.

    It is difficult to overestimate the contribution to the victory of the future founders of Akademgorodok. Mikhail Alekseevich Lavrentyev developed the theory of cumulation and decoding the actions of cumulative shells, on the basis of which a number of effective anti-tank ammunition was created, which played, among other things, a significant role in the outcome of the Battle of Kursk. The research of Sergei Alekseevich Khristianovich helped to increase the accuracy of shooting of another important class of weapons of that war – multiple launch rocket systems. The third co-founder of Akademgorodok Sergei Lvovich Sobolev worked on the development of computational mathematics during the war, and the results of his work later found expression in the successful implementation of the atomic and space projects of the Soviet Union.

    Many of the future famous scientists of the Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences went through the Great Patriotic War as soldiers and officers of the Red Army. Among them were the founder of the Institute of Nuclear Physics G.I. Budker, the founder of the Institute of Semiconductor Physics A.V. Rzhanov, one of the founders of the Institute of Thermal Physics S.S. Kutateladze, the author of the famous experiment on domesticating foxes and one of those who revived genetics in the USSR D.K. Belyaev, the future founder of the Physics and Mathematics School and one of the fathers of Soviet cybernetics A.A. Lyapunov and many others, whose names were also mentioned in Academician Molodin’s report.

    Also, as part of the telethon, PhD in History Stanislav Egorov presented a digital exhibition “From the War Fronts to the Scientific and Teaching Front: NSU Humanities Scientists — Participants in the Great Patriotic War.”

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI: Haffner Energy unveils Hynoca® Flex 500 IG: A flexible, cost-effective alternative to grey hydrogen and fossil fuels

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Haffner Energy unveils Hynoca® Flex 500 IG: A flexible, cost-effective alternative to grey hydrogen and fossil fuels

    Cogeneration of hydrogen and electricity offers a unique solution for managing random hydrogen demand

    Vitry-le-François, France – April 24, 2025, 08:00am (CET)

    Haffner Energy introduces Hynoca® Flex 500 IG, a line of hydrogen production units capable of producing 12 tonnes of green hydrogen per day to be delivered under €3/kg without subsidies. Hynoca®Flex 500 IG also enables the production of cost-competitive renewable electricity to manage fluctuations in hydrogen demand or ensure energy autonomy.

    “The expectations for hydrogen are extremely high, but they remain significantly constrained by the chicken-and-egg problem and the high cost of green hydrogen production,” said Philippe Haffner, Co-founder and CEO of Haffner Energy. “Our Hynoca® Flex 500 IG solution simultaneously addresses both challenges, in a market worth over €100 billion worldwide. This is a major milestone for our company, which is expected to have a significant impact on our 2025 results, and which should also enable us to build up our order book for the coming years. More generally, it’s clearly a major paradigm shift for the global hydrogen ecosystem.”

    Thanks to existing subsidies, grants or tax credits available in most developed countries, green hydrogen is now clearly cost-competitive with grey (fossil-based) hydrogen, while providing much more flexibility and bringing a carbon-free solution. Not only does hydrogen and electricity cogeneration provide a unique solution for managing fluctuating hydrogen demand, it can also ensure energy autonomy of the system or even create opportunities in off-grid locations.

    A major breakthrough for the hydrogen market

    With unmatched flexibility, optimized energy efficiency (80%), and near-independence from power grids, Hynoca® Flex 500 IG emerges as a scalable decentralized alternative to grey hydrogen and fossil fuels. The technology is modular and standardized, which ensures reliable and replicable deployment at scale. Available worldwide, the first units can be reserved starting today, with commissioning of the first units early 2027.

    A significant EBITDA contribution starting this year

    Hynoca® Flex 500 IG is expected to make a significant contribution to Haffner Energy’s revenue – and above all to its EBITDA – for the current fiscal year, notably through paying engineering studies. The company reiterates its objective to reach EBITDA breakeven by March 31, 2026.

    Cost-effective, modular green hydrogen

    Hynoca® Flex 500 IG combines performance and modularity to meet industrial and mobility needs:

    • Flexible production, requiring minimal or no grid dependency
    • Optimization of CAPEX and OPEX, ensuring that hydrogen can be commercialized under €3/kg without subsidies Over 80% energy efficiency, maximizing process performance
    • Rapid deployment, free from grid infrastructure constraints
    • Standardized design, ensuring predictable performance and simplified integration

    A syngas with unmatched competitiveness

    Hynoca® Flex 500 IG generates highly competitive syngas, the precursor to hydrogen. Its low cost opens up new economic opportunities beyond hydrogen production.

    • Profitable peak-hour electricity generation: The cost of syngas is so competitive that it enables power production during peak hours, making it an economically viable solution to balance hydrogen demand fluctuations.
    • Operational security without rigid contracts: This flexibility allows plant operators to maintain stable production without requiring rigid offtake agreements.

    By combining hydrogen and electricity generation, Hynoca® Flex 500 IG ensures continuous operation, optimizing revenue streams and enhancing economic resilience, making final investment decisions (FID) easier.

    A strategic complement to electrolysis and power-to-liquid (PTL)

    Each Hynoca® Flex 500 IG unit generates 58,000 tonnes of biogenic CO₂ per year, a key resource for PTL (e-fuels) production and a critical enabler for hydrogen from electrolysis.

    • 58,000 tonnes of renewable CO₂ can convert 5,230 tonnes of hydrogen into 42,000 tonnes of e-methanol (or 18,000 tonnes of e-SAF), easy to transport and store
    • 5,230 tonnes of hydrogen is the volume produced each year by 60 MW of electrolyzer capacity (4,000 hours/year load factor)
    • Strategic synergy between Hynoca® Flex 500 IG and electrolysis plants, structuring the hydrogen economy

    Hynoca® Flex 500 IG not only delivers competitive hydrogen, but it also supports the expansion of electrolysis by providing a reliable source of competitive biogenic CO2.

    Proven, standardized technology for industrial scale deployment

    Hynoca® Flex 500 IG builds on Hynoca® technology, already operational at the Center for hydrogen production, testing and training in Marolles, France. This unit has been producing hydrogen that meets mobility standards.

    Scaling up this technology ensures industrial continuity with no technical risks, optimizing implementation for large-scale projects.

    Hynoca® process accepts all possible organic renewable feedstocks, including agricultural residues, sludge, manure, municipal sorted waste, and woody by-products, supporting a circular, low-carbon economy with a near-zero carbon footprint. Compatibility with all organic feedstocks means considerably lower costs, while at the same time significantly improving security of supply.

    Each Hynoca®Flex 500 IG unit consumes approximately 31,000 tonnes of dry plant-based biomass per year.

    Reservations system to manage market demand

    A recent market survey conducted by Haffner Energy indicates that demand for Hynoca® Flex 500 IG will far exceed the company’s current industrial and commercial capacity.

    To structure production and ensure timely deployment, a reservations system is currently being prepared and will open in 2025 Q3. In the meanwhile, requests for quotations can be made to the company in advance.

    Reservations, which will involve the payment of an upfront fee, constitute a win/win system for the company and its customers, allowing in particular:

    • Guarantee that customers will be served in the face of demand that is expected to far exceed supply
    • Secure delivery timelines and fixed pricing
    • Substantial savings on typical FID (Final Investment Decision) costs
    • Assistance with feedstock sourcing plans

    This system prioritizes committed clients while allowing flexibility for project development, helping to align industrial production capacity with actual market needs.

    About Haffner Energy

    Haffner Energy is a French company providing solutions for the production of competitive clean fuels. With 32 years of experience converting biomass into renewable energies, it has developed innovative proprietary biomass thermolysis and gasification technologies to produce renewable gas, hydrogen and methanol, as well as Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF). The company also contributes to regenerating the planet, through the co-production of biogenic CO2 and biocarbon (or char/biochar). Haffner Energy is listed on Euronext Growth. (ISIN code: FR0014007ND6 – Ticker: ALHAF).

    Media relations

    HAFFNER ENERGY

    Laure BOURDON

    laure.bourdon@haffner-energy.com
    +33 (0) 7 87 96 35 15

    Sales relations

    sales@haffner-energy.com

    Investor relations

    investisseurs@haffner-energy.com

    Attachment

    The MIL Network