Category: Europe

MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Sustainability of the pension system – E-001555/2025
Source: European Parliament
Question for written answer E-001555/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Fernando Navarrete Rojas (PPE), Dolors Montserrat (PPE)

Milestone 409 of Spain’s recovery and resilience plan makes fiscal sustainability a condition for pension reform. On 31 March 2025, the Independent Authority for Financial Responsibility (IAFR) published its report on the pension expenditure rule – a rule that was agreed upon with the Commission and designed to assess the need for corrective action. The IAFR has also published its independent report on sustainability.

The conclusions are alarming:

(a) The expenditure rule agreed upon does not guarantee the system’s sustainability.

(b) Pension expenditure pressure has increased by 0.4 points of GDP.

(c) Transfers from the state will need to be increased by 2.4 points of GDP, which will add to debt.

(d) Without changes to the current policy, the deficit would hit 7 % and debt would reach 129 % of GDP in 2050.

In view of the above:

1.Does the Commission believe that the pension reform is still in line with the principle of fiscal sustainability?

2.Can Spain amend, through Royal Decree 100/2025, the content of milestone 409, which includes an independent assessment of pension sustainability?

3.Will the Commission take the conclusions in the IAFR’s independent report into account when assessing Spain’s request for the fifth disbursement?

Submitted: 16.4.2025
Last updated: 28 April 2025
MIL OSI Europe News –
April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Updating of designations of wine grape varieties with reference to origin – E-001573/2025
Source: European Parliament
Question for written answer E-001573/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Christine Schneider (PPE)

Part B of Annex IV to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/33 lists designations that are linked to a specific origin. Accordingly, wines from Germany may not bear the variety names Barbera or Sangiovese, for instance.

Part B of Annex IV dates back to a time when geographical protection was not yet enshrined in German wine designation law and was therefore not of strategic importance. For some of the grape varieties listed in Part B of Annex IV, there were official authorisations for testing from the time of the Germanic designation system. At present, no varietal wine can be produced in the vineyards concerned with indication of grape variety. Under the new system of geographical protection, i.e. designations of origin, official authorisations for testing are no longer possible. Clarification is therefore needed as to how the relevant vineyards and wines should be dealt with.

1.Is the Commission planning to revise and adapt Part B of Annex IV in order to take account of new developments in grape variety cultivation, including as regards necessary changes in the range of grape varieties as a result of climate change?

2.What legal changes does the Commission intend to prompt so that, for example, German wines produced from the Barbera or Sangiovese varieties can be marketed with indication of grape variety?

3.How should existing vineyards be dealt with in Germany if the vines concerned were originally planted lawfully and indication of wine grape variety is no longer possible?

Submitted: 17.4.2025
Last updated: 28 April 2025
MIL OSI Europe News –
April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Aviation safety and reporting systems – E-001567/2025
Source: European Parliament
Question for written answer E-001567/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Fabio De Masi (NI)

In its response to the question for written answer E-000314/2024[1], the Commission stated that unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) events could be reported under the category ‘unknown airborne objects’. However, such a category does not exist within ECCAIRS 2, the aviation safety reporting system governed by Regulation (EU) No 376/2014, and existing classifications do not adequately capture the nature of UAP incidents.

Will the Commission commit to reviewing and updating EU aviation reporting systems, including ECCAIRS 2, to introduce a dedicated and standardised reporting category for UAP incidents, in order to ensure consistency, data integrity and the highest standards of flight safety across the EU Member States?

Submitted: 17.4.2025

[1] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2024-000314-ASW_EN.html.
Last updated: 28 April 2025
MIL OSI Europe News –
April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU phytosanitary trade regulations on citrus black spot (CBS) and WTO dispute with South Africa – E-001568/2025

Source: European Parliament

Question for written answer E-001568/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Fabio De Masi (NI)

South Africa has initiated a WTO dispute settlement procedure in relation to the EU’s phytosanitary trade regulations regarding CBS. South Africa claims these regulations were primarily intended to shield Spanish and Portuguese producers of citrus fruits from South African competition. While the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) argued in 2013 that CBS could spread to citrus farms in the EU, scientists from Brazil, Argentina, the US, Uruguay, Australia and South Africa have challenged this assessment. South African producers point out that they have exported citrus fruits to the EU for over 110 years without a single case of CBS transmission, and argue that CBS would be a purely cosmetic issue, affecting only a very small proportion of exported fruit and unable to spread via fruit to other climatic zones.

Has EFSA submitted any new studies or findings to the WTO since 2013 to support the EU’s position and the 2013 assessment? If so, what information has been communicated?

Submitted: 17.4.2025

Last updated: 28 April 2025

MIL OSI Europe News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Building the new northern section of the A33 motorway through a Natura 2000 site – E-001537/2025
Source: European Parliament
Question for written answer E-001537/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Jutta Paulus (Verts/ALE)

Germany is planning to build a new northern section of the A33 motorway in the Osnabrück area. Building that section is termed a motorway completion measure. The plan is for the section to run from the current motorway endpoint in Belm municipality and link up with the A1 motorway at Bramsche. The motorway will run through predominantly agricultural areas in Belm municipality and through residential parts of the village of Rulle in Wallenhorst municipality. The new section will cross a Natura 2000 site: the Wiehengebirge bat habitat near Osnabrück (EEA-ID DE3614334). As a Natura 2000 site will be affected by construction of the new section, the Commission’s approval is required.

1.When Germany applies for authorisation, does the Commission intend to check whether there is sufficient provision for the requisite coherence measures?

2.In the Commission’s view, can a Natura 2000 site be called into question at all by Member States and, if so, how does the Commission intend to ensure that equivalent sites are designated in the immediate vicinity of the Natura 2000 site affected that afford precisely the same protected status?

3.If Germany’s application is approved, does the Commission intend to press for a speed limit to be introduced so as to safeguard the Natura 2000 site, since the types of habitat there are subject to nitrogen pollution, which is very high in some instances, and a speed limit might possibly provide a remedy?

Submitted: 15.4.2025
Last updated: 28 April 2025
MIL OSI Europe News –
April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The upgrading of the EU’s repressive mechanisms through ProtectEU at the expense of the people and their struggles against its war plans – E-001566/2025
Source: European Parliament
Question for written answer E-001566/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Kostas Papadakis (NI)

The ‘European Internal Security Strategy’ (ProtectEU), along with the ‘White Paper’, the ‘Preparedness Strategy’ and the ‘European Democracy Shield’, complete the armouring of the EU framework for EU war preparation in the context of intensifying competition with China and Russia but even also the US – the simultaneous confrontation of the ‘enemy within’ for repression at the expense of the people.

In view of this:

1.What is the Commission’s position on the fact that the protection of ‘critical infrastructure’ in the context of war preparations bears no relation to the real needs of the people for civil protection, such as flood and fire protection measures, which have for a long time demonstrably not been included among the priorities of the EU and bourgeois governments, as they do not guarantee immediate profits for monopoly groups, in contrast to the war industry for which good money is paid by the people?

2.What is the Commission’s position on the fact that infrastructure that is truly critical for the people, such as highways, bridges, railways, etc., is, due to the priority given to the war economy and ‘military mobility’, being devalued and condemned to decline without the required funding from the EU and governments, resulting in great risks to the safety and lives of passengers and workers, but at the same time the transport of NATO war cargo constitutes a risk to life and the potential cause of a large-scale accident?

3.What is the Commission’s position on the fact that the upgrading of the role of the EU’s repressive mechanisms, as reflected in the ‘security strategy’, signals an intensification of the attack on the people and the suppression of workers’ and popular mobilisations against its war plans?

Submitted: 17.4.2025
Last updated: 28 April 2025
MIL OSI Europe News –
April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) harmonised labelling and the risk of fragmentation – E-001543/2025
Source: European Parliament
Question for written answer E-001543/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Massimiliano Salini (PPE)

Under Article 12 of the PPWR, the Commission is set to harmonise consumer sorting instructions. The Joint Research Centre (JRC) is currently working on a universal pictogram-based labelling system instead of text in order to overcome language barriers, simplify packaging design and promote single market integration. However, the JRC and the Commission appear to be considering prioritising a version of the label with text in national languages as the ‘most preferred option’. Should the Commission endorse this option, whether as a mandatory requirement or as part of the guidelines, it will contravene the PPWR’s harmonisation and recyclable at scale objectives, weakening the Commission’s efforts to protect the single market, as reaffirmed through infringement proceedings launched concerning national sorting instructions.

1.Does the Commission intend to mandate the use of text in the label prototype or as part of the guidelines? If so, how will it preserve the PPWR’s harmonisation objective?

2.Has the Commission assessed the risk that national translations could cause fragmentation and higher compliance costs for businesses and consumers?

3.In the light of recent infringements, how does the Commission justify supporting a labelling approach that may cause fragmentation?

Submitted: 15.4.2025
Last updated: 28 April 2025
MIL OSI Europe News –
April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Maritime Spatial Planning – Greece’s non-compliance with European law – P-001602/2025
Source: European Parliament
Priority question for written answer P-001602/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Nikolaos Anadiotis (NI)

According to Directive 2014/89/EU[1], Member States were required to adopt and implement maritime spatial plans by 31 March 2021. Greece has not yet complied, which affects not only its national interests but also the interests of the EU as a whole, as it undermines the uniform application of European law and the sustainable development of maritime areas.

The Greek government invoked force majeure, namely the negotiations on the delimitation of the EEZ with Egypt, among others. However, on 27 February 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union definitively condemned Greece for its non-compliance (case C-128/24[2]), rejecting the argument by noting that the obligation to comply cannot be suspended due to bilateral negotiations and that Member States must comply with their obligations regardless of internal or external factors, and imposed a fine. On 16 April 2025, the Greek Government hastily published an ‘MSP Charter’.[3]

In view of the above, does the charter in question meet the requirements of the directive and is it sufficient to suspend the administrative fine that Greece is paying for its non-compliance immediately, following the rulings against it by the European Court?

Submitted: 22.4.2025

[1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2014/89/oj?eliuri=eli%3Adir%3A2014%3A89%3Aoj&locale=el.

[2] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EL/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62024CJ0128

[3] https://www.mfa.gr/gia-proti-fora-sti-chora-thalassios-chorotaxikos-schediasmos-2/
Last updated: 28 April 2025
MIL OSI Europe News –
April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Pensions and fiscal plan – E-001553/2025

Source: European Parliament

Question for written answer E-001553/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Fernando Navarrete Rojas (PPE), Dolors Montserrat (PPE)

The Commission and the Council have approved Spain’s medium-term fiscal plan, which sets an expenditure path consistent with reducing debt. However, on 31 March 2025, Spain’s Independent Authority for Fiscal Responsibility (IAFR) published its assessment of the pension system expenditure rule. In the assessment, it warns about increased financing requirements and questions the sustainability of public finances.

The fiscal plan was drawn up on the basis of an increase in social contributions of 1.8 % of GDP, which would reduce the adjustments needed to keep debt on a downward trajectory and allow for greater growth in net expenditure compared to the Commission’s path.

Nevertheless, the IAFR notes that, as the closure clause is not triggered, those increases will not apply in the short term. Instead, transfers from the central administration will need to be increased by 2.4 percentage points of GDP. Doing so will cause debt to rise and changes the key assumptions behind the fiscal plan.

In the light of the above:

In accordance with the Commission’s DSA model, in the wake of the IAFR’s new estimates regarding pension spending, is Spain’s approved expenditure path still in line with the debt reduction required?

Submitted: 16.4.2025

Last updated: 28 April 2025

MIL OSI Europe News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – The 2 Pillar framework in view of international developments and the EU-US relations – Subcommittee on Tax Matters

Source: European Parliament

On 15 May 2025, from 11:15 to 12:30, the FISC Subcommittee will host a public hearing on “The implementation of the 2 Pillar framework in view of international developments and the EU-US relations”.

With the change of government in the United States, the hearing will assess the implications for the EU’s approach to global tax governance and explore the implementation of the OECD’s 2-Pillar framework. This framework aims to address global tax challenges by ensuring that multinational corporations pay at least a minimum level of taxes and contribute their fair share to public finances in the countries where they operate.

Additionally, the discussion will examine how these developments influence ongoing tax negotiations at the UN level and what role the EU can play in shaping a fair and sustainable global tax system. The hearing will provide an opportunity a platform for experts to assess the current state of international tax cooperation and discuss potential avenues for future reforms.

MIL OSI Europe News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – The future of EU anti-avoidance tax rules, including simplification – Subcommittee on Tax Matters

Source: European Parliament

On 15 May 2025, from 10:00 to 11:15, the FISC Subcommittee will host a public hearing on “The future of EU anti-avoidance tax rules, including simplification”.

This public hearing will take stock of the EU’s progress in tackling corporate tax evasion and avoidance, with a particular focus on the EU anti-avoidance framework–particularly the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directives (ATAD I & II). It will explore how the current framework can be modernised to better reflect today’s economic realities, technological developments, and the administrative needs of Member States, including updates on key legislative initiatives such as the Unshell proposal.

At the same time, the hearing will highlight the need to simplify and harmonise EU anti-avoidance rules to reduce complexity, enhance legal certainty, and ease compliance for both businesses and tax administrations, ultimately contributing to a fairer and more efficient internal market.

MIL OSI Europe News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Hearings – The 2 Pillar framework in view of international developments and the EU-US relations – 15-05-2025 – Subcommittee on Tax Matters

Source: European Parliament

On 15 May 2025, from 11:15 to 12:30, the FISC Subcommittee will host a public hearing on “The implementation of the 2 Pillar framework in view of international developments and the EU-US relations”.

With the change of government in the United States, the hearing will assess the implications for the EU’s approach to global tax governance and explore the implementation of the OECD’s 2-Pillar framework. This framework aims to address global tax challenges by ensuring that multinational corporations pay at least a minimum level of taxes and contribute their fair share to public finances in the countries where they operate.

Additionally, the discussion will examine how these developments influence ongoing tax negotiations at the UN level and what role the EU can play in shaping a fair and sustainable global tax system. The hearing will provide an opportunity a platform for experts to assess the current state of international tax cooperation and discuss potential avenues for future reforms.

MIL OSI Europe News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: REPORT on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 as regards the role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season – A10-0079/2025

Source: European Parliament

DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 as regards the role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season

(COM(2025)0099 – C10‑0041/2025 – 2025/0051(COD))

(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

– having regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2025)0099),

– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 194(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C10‑0041/2025),

– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 26 March 2025 [1],

– having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of …[2],

– having regard to Rule 60 of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A10-0079/2025),

1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

Amendment 1

AMENDMENTS BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT [*]

to the Commission proposal

———————————————————

REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Amending Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 as regards the role of gas storage for securing gas supplies ahead of the winter season

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 194(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,

Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,

Whereas:

(1) Regulation (EU) 2022/1032 of the Parliament and of the Council [3] was adopted in reaction to the gas-supply crisis and unprecedented price increases caused by the escalation of the Russia’s ongoing unjustified and unprovoked war of aggression against Ukraine since February 2022, impelling the Union to act in a coordinated and comprehensive manner to avoid potential risks resulting from further gas-supply disruptions.

(2) Regulation (EU) 2022/1032 amended Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 by introducing a temporary legal framework for measures regarding the filling level of underground storage facilities to strengthen the security of gas supply in the Union, in particular gas supplies to protected customers.

(3) Gas-storage facilities provide for 30% of the Union’s gas consumption during the winter months, and well-filled underground gas-storage facilities as well as gas demand reduction contribute substantially to the security of gas supply by providing additional gas in the event of high demand or supply disruptions.

(4) The laying down of a mandatory target to ensure that gas-storage facilities are 90% full by 1 November (filling target), with a series of intermediate targets for each Member State in February, May, July and September of the following year ▌(filling trajectory), proved to be fundamental during the energy crisis sparked by Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and Russia’s weaponisation of its gas supplies in both: (i) weathering the gas-supply shortages; and (ii) reducing market uncertainties and price volatility.

(5) Despite the substantial improvement of the gas market situation compared to the period 2022-2023 ▌, the European gas market remains tight and the geopolitical situation remains unclear. More intense competition for global LNG supplies can increase Member States exposure to price volatility. ▌In such situation, the role of gas storages remains paramount. ▌

(6) Pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 the obligation of the Member States to follow an annual filling trajectory and to ensure that the filling target is achieved by 1 November of each year expires on 31 December 2025.

(6a) Since 2022, the Union has substantially succeeded in making gas supplies more secure by increasing LNG imports from trustworthy global partners and is aiming to fully eliminate the Union’s reliance on Russian fossil fuels, building on the progress of REPowerEU. The Union has developed new regasification facilities and port terminals, while also establishing a liquid gas market that ensures strong resilience against potential disruptions in the remaining Russian pipeline supplies.

(6b) The changed global political environment has to be taken into account with regard to the reliability of the gas suppliers and gas supplying countries.

(7) In the light of the European success to derisk its gas import structure, the overall framework to meet the Union’s need for natural gas must strike a balance between energy security and the return to market-based principles. It must thus be flexible enough during the filling season to allow a swift reaction to constantly changing market conditions and in particular to take advantage of the best purchasing conditions in order to bring down gas prices in Europe. The filling target should therefore be lowered to 83 %

(8) To enhance market stability and mitigate the risk of undue price volatility potentially triggered by intermediary filling targets, it is appropriate to provide increased flexibility for storage filling. Member States should therefore provide indicative filling plans on a yearly basis that could include where appropriate an indicative filling trajectory and should allow for storage filling in such a way that there is sufficient flexibility available for market participants throughout the year, taking into account Recommendation (2025)1481.

(8a) Member States should have the possibility to deviate by up to four percentage points from the filling target in the case of unfavourable market conditions, relating, inter alia, to factors such as supply and demand and competition, or of trading activities hindering cost-effective storage filling, that significantly limit the ability to ensure that the gas storages are filled in accordance with this Regulation.

(8b) Moreover, the Commission should be empowered to adopt delegated acts to amend for one filling season the level of the allowed deviation of four percentage points by increasing it by up to an additional four percentage points, in the case of persistent unfavourable market conditions.

(8c) The cumulative effects of the flexibilities and derogations in this Regulation should not bring down the overall storage filling obligations under 75 %.

(9) The Commission’s assessment of the current energy-security framework has confirmed the positive impact of the storage-filling requirements on the security of gas supply and those positive effects should be preserved beyond 2025. Extending these measures would not only contribute to the continued safeguarding of supply security, but would also constitute a key instrument in the Union’s efforts to eliminate its dependence on imports of gas originating in the Russian Federation.

(9a) At the same time this Regulation should respond to current and future changes in the natural gas markets and contribute to the strategic objective of bringing down energy prices and facilitate the gradual return towards market-based mechanisms for storage refilling.

(9b) In order to maintain the security of supply and the appropriate level of filling, the Commission should continuously monitor the market and explore ways that could help meet the filling target, for example using demand aggregation and joint purchasing mechanisms.

(10) It is therefore necessary to extend by two years the relevant gas storage filling provisions that provide predictability and transparency as to the utilisation of gas-storage facilities across the Union while at the same time introducing some flexibility into this Regulation.

(10a) In line with the Commission’s commitment to better regulation and simplification, and reflecting the overall improvement in the Union’s energy security framework, the monitoring of compliance with this Regulation should place greater trust in the Member States’ administrative capacities. The supervisory burden on the Commission should be reduced accordingly, with a shift towards lighter-touch reporting obligations and streamlined procedures. This approach reinforces the principle of subsidiarity, avoids unnecessary administrative complexity, and is consistent with the Commission’s simplification efforts as outlined in its Work Programme 2025.

(10b) Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 should be revised by the Commission in due time and before 2027 to be adapted to the evolving energy landscape and to reflect the future needs for gas storage. Among other issues, any amendments should address the limitations of the current definition of “protected customers”, the prevention of speculation on the gas markets and speculative activities that artificially inflate prices, the role of energy efficiency measures leading to verifiable gas demand reduction and how this could be used for further flexibilities by Member States and consider the framework under an evolving energy mix that will have an increased role of alternative sources to gas such as renewable energy sources, hydrogen together with the role of energy efficiency.

(11) Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Amendment to Regulation (EU) 2017/1938

▌Regulation (EU) 2017/1938 is amended as follows:

(1) in Article 2, point 27 is deleted;

(2) Article 6a is amended as follows:

(a) the title is replaced by the following: ‘Filling target’;

(b) in paragraph 1, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

‘1. Subject to paragraphs 2 to 5, Member States shall meet the filling target of 83 % for the aggregated capacity of all underground gas storage facilities that are located on their territory and directly interconnected to a market area in their territory and for storage facilities listed in Annex Ib at any point in time between 1 October and 1 December each year.’;

(c) the following paragraphs are inserted:

‘5a. Notwithstanding paragraph 1 and without prejudice to the obligation of other Member States to fill the underground gas storage facilities concerned, Member States may decide to deviate by up to four percentage points, from the filling target set out in paragraph 1 for each Member State if market conditions are unfavourable for filling underground gas storage facilities.

5b. In duly justified cases of persistent unfavourable market conditions, and provided that the security of supply of the Union and the Member States is not undermined, the Commission is empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 19 to amend this Regulation by increasing the allowed deviation for Member States, as laid down in paragraph 5a by up to 4 percentage points.

In its assessment, the Commission shall in particular take into account the level of storage filling in the Member States, global gas supply, ENTSOG’s seasonal supply outlook, and indications of market manipulation. It may also take into consideration Member State measures, such as the deployment of gas demand-reduction measures for gas that achieve equivalent gas reductions during the following withdrawal season.

5c. Member States referred to in paragraph 2 may under the same conditions as those provided for in paragraph 5a decide to deviate by up to 1,55 % below the volume set out in paragraph 2.

5d. Before using any of the deviations provided for in paragraphs 5a and 5c, each Member State shall consult the Commission and provide without undue delay a justification for its decision. The Commission shall promptly inform the GCG about the cumulative effects of all deviations pursuant to paragraphs 5a and 5c and any directly affected Member States.’;

(d) paragraph 6 and 7 are replaced by the following:

‘6. In order to meet the filling target, Member States shall take all necessary measures and strive to follow the filling plan defined in accordance to paragraph 7.

7. Member States with underground gas storage facilities shall submit to the Commission in due time an indicative filling plan for the whole calendar year to reach the yearly gas storage filling target set in paragraph 1. The plan shall include technical information for the underground gas storage facilities on its territory and shall be directly interconnected to its market area in an aggregated form.’;

(e) paragraph 8 is deleted;

(f) paragraphs 10 and 11 are replaced by the following:

‘10. The competent authority of each Member State shall continuously monitor compliance with the filling target as set in the filling plan and shall report regularly and at least once per month to the Commission and the GCG. If it is foreseen that the target cannot be met, the competent authority shall, without delay, take effective measures to meet the target. Member States shall inform the Commission and the GCG of the measures taken.

11. In the event of a substantial and sustained deviation by a Member State from the filling plan, which compromises the meeting of the filling target or in the event of a deviation from the filling target, the Commission shall, where appropriate, after consulting the GCG and the Member States concerned, issue a recommendation to that Member State or to the other Member States concerned regarding measures to be taken immediately to remedy the deviation or to minimize the impact on the security of supply, considering inter alia possible unfavourable market conditions. and specificities of Member States, such as the technical characteristics and size of the underground gas storage facilities in relation to the domestic gas consumption, the declining importance of the underground low calorific gas storage facilities for the security of gas supply, and existing LNG storage capacity.

11a. When a Member State does not meet the filling target set in paragraph 1 thus endangering the security of supply of the Union, the Commission shall adopt an implementing act setting a filling plan for that Member State for the year after, based on the technical information provided by each Member State and taking into account the assessment of the GCG. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 18a(2). It shall be based on an assessment of the general security of gas supply situation and the development of gas demand and supply in the Union and individual Member States with the aim of safeguarding the security of gas supply.’;

(3) Article 6b is amended as follows:

(a) the title is replaced by the following: ‘Implementation of the filling target’;

(b) in paragraph 1, the first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

‘1. Member States shall take all necessary measures to meet the filling target set pursuant to Article 6a. When ensuring that the filling target is met, Member States shall prioritise, where possible, market-based measures.’;

(c) paragraph 2 is replaced by the following:

‘2. The measures taken by the Member States pursuant to paragraph 1 shall be limited to what is necessary to meet the filling target. They shall be clearly defined, transparent, proportionate, non-discriminatory and verifiable. They shall not unduly distort competition or the proper functioning of the internal market in gas, unduly increase energy costs or endanger the security of gas supply of other Member States or of the Union. Member States shall inform the Commission and the GCG of any such measures.’;

(4) Article 6c is amended as follows:

(a) in paragraph 1, first subparagraph is replaced by the following:

‘1. A Member State without underground gas storage facilities shall ensure that market participants within that Member State have in place arrangements with underground storage system operators or other market participants in Member States with underground gas storage facilities. Those arrangements shall provide for the use, by 1 December, of storage volumes corresponding to at least 15 % of the average annual gas consumption over the preceding five years of the Member State without underground gas storage facilities. However, where cross-border transmission capacity or other technical limitations prevent a Member State without underground gas storage facilities from fully using 15 % of those storage volumes, that Member State shall store only those volumes that are technically possible.’;

(b) in paragraph 2, second subparagraph is replaced by the following:

‘Member States without underground gas storage facilities shall demonstrate that they comply with paragraph 1 and shall notify the Commission accordingly.’;

(c) in paragraph 5, first subparagraph, point (a) is replaced by the following:

‘(a) ensure that by 1 December storage volumes correspond at least to the average usage of the storage capacity over the preceding five years, determined, inter alia, by taking into account the flows during withdrawal season over the preceding five years from the Member States where the storage facilities are located; or’;

(d) paragraph 6 is replaced by the following:

‘6. Unless otherwise specified in Annex Ib, in the case of underground gas storage facilities located in one Member State that are not covered by paragraph 5 but that are directly connected to the market area of another Member State, that other Member State shall ensure that between 1 October and 1 December storage volumes correspond to at least the average of the storage capacity booked at the relevant cross-border point over the preceding five years.’;

(5) Article 6d is amended as follows:

(a) paragraphs 1 and 2 are replaced by the following:

‘1. Storage system operators shall report the filling level to the competent authority in each Member State where the underground gas storage facilities concerned are located and, if applicable, to an entity designated by that Member State (the ‘designated entity’) as set pursuant to Article 6a.

2. The competent authority and, if applicable, the designated entity of each Member State shall monitor the filling levels of the underground gas storage facilities on their territory at the end of each month and report monthly the results to the Commission without any delay. The competent authority shall also include information on the share of gas originating in the Russian federation being stored in that Member State, where such information is available.

The Commission may, where appropriate, invite the European Union Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) to assist with such monitoring.’;

(b) paragraphs 4 and 5 are replaced by the following:

‘4. The GCG shall assist the Commission in the monitoring of the filling ▌target, and shall develop guidance for the Commission on adequate measures to ensure better alignment in the event that Member States filling rates compromise the achievement of the filling target, or to ensure compliance with the filling target.

4a. Where appropriate, the Commission shall implement measures helping Member States to meet the filling target, including measures to encourage participation in the demand aggregation and joint purchasing mechanism set up under Regulation (EU) 2022/2576 (‘AggregateEU’)* .

5. Member States and, where appropriate, the Commission shall take the necessary measures to meet the filling target and to enforce upon market participants the storage obligations. These measures may include sufficiently deterrent sanctions and fines, such as adequate financial penalties.

___________________

* Council Regulation (EU) 2022/2576 of 19 December 2022 enhancing solidarity through better coordination of gas purchases, reliable price benchmarks and exchanges of gas across borders (OJ L 335, 29.12.2022, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2576/oj).’;

(6) in Article 17a, paragraph 1, the following point is added:

‘(da) the information about the share of gas originating in the Russian federation stored in the EU storages, provided by Member States in accordance with Article 6d(2).’;

(7) in Article 22, the fourth paragraph is replaced by the following:

‘Article 2, points (27) to (31), Articles 6a to 6d, Article 16(3), Article 17a, Article 18a, Article 20(4) and Annex Ib shall apply until 31 December 2027.’;

(8) Annex Ia is deleted.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force and shall apply on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For the European Parliament

The President

For the Council

The President

MIL OSI Europe News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Hearings – The future of EU anti-avoidance tax rules, including simplification – 15-05-2025 – Subcommittee on Tax Matters

Source: European Parliament

On 15 May 2025, from 10:00 to 11:15, the FISC Subcommittee will host a public hearing on “The future of EU anti-avoidance tax rules, including simplification”.

This public hearing will take stock of the EU’s progress in tackling corporate tax evasion and avoidance, with a particular focus on the EU anti-avoidance framework–particularly the Anti-Tax Avoidance Directives (ATAD I & II). It will explore how the current framework can be modernised to better reflect today’s economic realities, technological developments, and the administrative needs of Member States, including updates on key legislative initiatives such as the Unshell proposal.

At the same time, the hearing will highlight the need to simplify and harmonise EU anti-avoidance rules to reduce complexity, enhance legal certainty, and ease compliance for both businesses and tax administrations, ultimately contributing to a fairer and more efficient internal market.

MIL OSI Europe News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The official approval of Romanian as a language of instruction in schools in the Odesa region, and respect for the rights of the Romanian minority in Ukraine – P-001600/2025

Source: European Parliament

Priority question for written answer P-001600/2025/rev.1
to the Commission
Rule 144
Şerban Dimitrie Sturdza (ECR)

Ukraine, as an EU candidate country, has committed to reforms in the field of minority rights. However, the Romanian community in the Odesa region (124 475 people according to the 2001 census) is facing violations of the right to education in their mother tongue due to the unjustified use of the term ‘Moldovan language’ instead of ‘Romanian language’ in schools – a practice inherited from the Soviet era.

Although the Government of Ukraine adopted a decision on 18 October 2023 (minutes no. 115), and the Ministry of Education and Science issued a statement on 16 November 2023, to correct this terminology, 10 schools in the Odesa region (subject to administrative litigation no. 640/8013/21 since 2021) are still required to use the incorrect term. This administrative and legal deadlock undermines trust in Ukraine’s accession process and contradicts EU standards regarding the protection of minorities.

What measures will the Commission take to support the correct implementation of the Ukrainian Government’s decisions regarding the official recognition of the Romanian language in schools in the Odesa region?

Submitted: 22.4.2025

Last updated: 28 April 2025

MIL OSI Europe News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Latest news – Meeting of the D-MX Delegation of 24 April 2025 – Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee

Source: European Parliament

This meeting of the Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (D-MX) took place on 24 April 2025 and was‘in camera’ focusing on the preparation of the 31st EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Meeting due to take place in Brussels on 15 May 2025.

MIL OSI Europe News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: REPORT on the request for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun – A10-0081/2025

Source: European Parliament

PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DECISION

on the request for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun

(2024/2102(IMM))

The European Parliament,

– having regard to the request for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun by the Prosecutor General of Poland, dated 29 October 2024, transmitting a request submitted by the Regional Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw, in connection with criminal proceedings brought against Grzegorz Braun, and announced in plenary on 14 November 2024,

– having regard to the fact that Grzegorz Braun is deemed to have renounced his right to be heard under Rule 9(6) of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to Articles 8 and 9 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, and Article 6(2) of the Act of 20 September 1976 concerning the election of the members of the European Parliament by direct universal suffrage,

– having regard to the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 21 October 2008, 19 March 2010, 6 September 2011, 17 January 2013, 19 December 2019 and 5 July 2023 [1],

– having regard to Article 105(2) and (5) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland,

– having regard to Rule 5(2), Rule 6(1) and Rule 9 of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A10-0081/2025),

A. whereas, by letter dated 29 October 2024, the Prosecutor General of Poland transmitted a request for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun, submitted by the Regional Prosecutor’s Office in Warsaw, in relation to several alleged offences that occurred in 2022 and 2023;

B. whereas, according to the request, on 1 March 2022, in the building of the National Institute of Cardiology – State Research Institute, Grzegorz Braun allegedly violated the bodily integrity of a public official who was acting in his capacity as Director of the National Institute of Cardiology, during and in connection with the performance of official duties by this public official; whereas the alleged actions constitute an offence under Article 222(1) of the Polish Criminal Code, concurrently with Article 191(1) of the Polish Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 11(2) of that Code;

C. whereas, on 1 March 2022, Grzegorz Braun allegedly insulted the Director of the National Institute of Cardiology, during and in connection with the performance of official duties by this public official, by making accusations against him and by streaming the events over the internet, which could allegedly have damaged the official’s public reputation and rendered likely a loss of the necessary trust placed in him to perform his role as Director of the National Institute of Cardiology and exercise the profession of doctor; whereas the alleged actions constitute an offence under Article 226(1) of the Polish Criminal Code, concurrently with Article 212(1) and (2) of the Polish Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 11(2) of that Code;

D. whereas, on 27 January 2023, Grzegorz Braun allegedly damaged a Christmas tree and destroyed decorations that were the property of two Polish associations whose offices were in the building of the Regional Court in Kraków, and whereas causing such damage constitutes an offence under Article 288(1) of the Polish Criminal Code;

E. whereas, on 30 May 2023, at the headquarters of the German Historical Institute in Warsaw, Grzegorz Braun allegedly damaged property belonging to the German Historical Institute, which constitutes an offence under Article 288(1) of the Polish Criminal Code;

F. whereas, on 30 May 2023, Grzegorz Braun allegedly failed to leave the headquarters of the German Historical Institute despite being asked to do so by an authorised person, which constitutes an offence under Article 193(1) of the Polish Criminal Code;

G. whereas, on 12 December 2023, within the premises of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, Grzegorz Braun allegedly publicly insulted a group of people on the grounds of their religious affiliation and allegedly publicly insulted an object of religious worship (a menorah) by extinguishing its lit candles with a fire extinguisher, thereby allegedly offending the religious sentiments of Jews, which constitutes an offence under Article 257 of the Polish Criminal Code, concurrently with Articles 195(1) and 196 of the Polish Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 11(2) of that Code;

H. whereas, on 12 December 2023, within the premises of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, Grzegorz Braun allegedly violated the bodily integrity of an aggrieved party who intervened with a view to protecting public order, by aiming at the aggrieved party the spray from a fire extinguisher containing a powdery substance; whereas Grzegorz Braun allegedly caused minor damage, lasting up to seven days, to the health of the aggrieved party, which constitutes an offence under Article 157(2) of the Polish Criminal Code, concurrently with Article 217a of the Polish Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 11(2) of that Code;

I. whereas the investigation carried out in connection with the alleged offences outlined in the waiver request was initially opened on 25 May 2023, at which time Grzegorz Braun enjoyed immunity as a Member of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland; whereas on 17 January 2024, the Sejm of the Republic of Poland granted consent for criminal charges to be brought against Grzegorz Braun in connection with the offences outlined in the request; whereas Grzegorz Braun was elected to the European Parliament in the European elections in June 2024; whereas Grzegorz Braun was therefore not a Member of the European Parliament at the time of the alleged offences;

J. whereas the alleged offences and the subsequent request for the waiver of his immunity are not related to an opinion expressed or a vote cast by Grzegorz Braun in the performance of his duties within the meaning of Article 8 of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union;

K. whereas Article 9, first paragraph, point (a), of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union provides that Members of the European Parliament enjoy, in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of their parliament;

L. whereas, in accordance with Article 105(2) and (5) of the Polish Constitution, from the day of the announcement of the results of the elections until the day of the expiry of his or her mandate, a Deputy shall not be subjected to criminal accountability without the consent of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland and he or she shall be neither detained nor arrested without the consent of the Sejm, except for cases when he or she has been apprehended in the commission of an offence and in which his or her detention is necessary for securing the proper course of proceedings;

M. whereas the purpose of parliamentary immunity is to protect Parliament and its Members from legal proceedings in relation to activities carried out in the performance of parliamentary duties and which cannot be separated from those duties;

N. whereas, in accordance with Rule 5(2) of its Rules of Procedure, parliamentary immunity is not a personal privilege of the Member but a guarantee of the independence of Parliament as a whole, and of its Members;

O. whereas, in this case, Parliament found no evidence of fumus persecutionis, which is to say factual elements indicating that the intention underlying the legal proceedings in question is to undermine the Member’s political activity in his capacity as a Member of the European Parliament;

P. whereas Parliament cannot assume the role of a court, and whereas, in a waiver of immunity procedure, a Member cannot be regarded as a defendant [2];

1. Decides to waive the immunity of Grzegorz Braun;

2. Instructs its President to forward this decision and the report of its committee responsible immediately to the competent authorities of the Republic of Poland and to Grzegorz Braun.

MIL OSI Europe News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Oxfam: EUR 1 billion for a colossal NGO that is costing us a fortune? – P-001591/2025
Source: European Parliament
Priority question for written answer P-001591/2025
to the Commission
Rule 144
Virginie Joron (PfE)

European Court of Auditors Special Report 11/2025 reveals shortcomings in the transparency of EU funding for non-governmental associations.

Oxfam is believed to have received EUR 795 million between 2014 and 2023[1]. However, its lobbying office in Brussels[2] reports having received no EU subsidies for 2023-2024, while Oxfam Belgium discloses EUR 7 million for 2023, with inconsistencies in its overall budget (EUR 47.5 million declared and incorrect calculations)[3].

The sky-high salaries of some of its executives (up to EUR 155 000 per year)[4] and its sale of goods in shops raise questions about Oxfam’s status as a charitable association and the legitimacy of the European, national and regional public funds it receives.

1.How can the Commission explain the failure to check the inconsistencies in Oxfam’s financial arrangements or declarations (no subsidies declared by one entity, EUR 7 million by another; incorrect budget for Oxfam Belgium and its status as a charitable, non-profit-making association[5])?

2.Oxfam claims to be a charitable association even though it engages in commercial transactions and some of its executives receive exorbitant salaries: at what threshold of executive remuneration does the Commission consider that an organisation has a commercial or profit-making purpose?

3.Are national and European subsidies to Oxfam compatible with competition rules on state aid and the Treaties?

Submitted: 22.4.2025

[1] https://ec.europa.eu/budget/financial-transparency-system/analysis.html

[2] https://transparency-register.europa.eu/searchregister-or-update/organisation-detail_en?id=46856801604-90

[3] https://transparency-register.europa.eu/searchregister-or-update/organisation-detail_en?id=961809845865-57

[4] EUR 155 000 in Great Britain (Grok); EUR 126 000 in 2023 for the PDG of Oxfam Ireland p.93: https://www.oxfamireland.org/sites/default/files/2023-09/2022_2023%20Oxfam%20Ireland%20Annual%20Report%20.pdf

[5] https://transparency-register.europa.eu/guidance/guidelines_en#ref-5-information-to-be-entered-in-the-register
Last updated: 28 April 2025
MIL OSI Europe News –
April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Europe: OSCE Court of Conciliation and Arbitration releases 2024 Annual Report

Source: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe – OSCE

Headline: OSCE Court of Conciliation and Arbitration releases 2024 Annual Report

The latest Annual Report of the OSCE Court of Conciliation and Arbitration (CCA) has now been published. The 2024 report provides an account of the CCA’s institutional matters over the past year and the efforts made by members of the CCA’s Bureau to raise awareness of the Court and its potential.
The report highlights CCA President Emmanuel Decaux’s address to the OSCE Permanent Council on 2 May 2024. The Court’s use as a key instrument for peacefully resolving conflicts and its significant role within the OSCE framework was emphasized by Decaux in the annual presentation of the CCA’s activities.
Further highlights include a case study of the first-ever simulation of conciliation proceedings within the Court. The simulation was hosted at the Faculty of Law of the University of Ljubljana in December 2024 as part of efforts to bolster a deeper understanding of the Court’s role, potential and purpose.
A special dedication in the report also honors the first president of the Court, Robert Badinter, who passed away in 2024. He played an instrumental role in establishing the CCA and served as its President from its founding in 1995 until 2013. In tribute to his legacy, the CCA published in March 2024 a selection of the proceedings from the CCA’s 30th anniversary seminar held in 24 November 2022.
The OSCE Court of Conciliation and Arbitration provides a set of mechanisms for the peaceful settlement of disputes between States. The Court was established by the Convention of Stockholm, which entered into force on 5 December 1994. To date, 34 OSCE participating States have ratified the Convention.

MIL OSI Europe News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Islanders reminded to give views on dealing with complaints about public services28 April 2025 Islanders are being reminded that they have just over a week left to share their views on the handling and review of complaints about public services, before the public consultation closes on 6… Read more

Source: Channel Islands – Jersey

28 April 2025

Islanders are being reminded that they have just over a week left to share their views on the handling and review of complaints about public services, before the public consultation closes on 6 May.

The consultation launched on Monday 10 March to inform a project being led by Deputy Moz Scott, Assistant Minister for Sustainable Economic Development and External Relations.

Deputy Scott has been tasked by the Chief Minister to develop proposals to improve the resolution of complaints against providers of public services, with the aim of improving services for the public.

The project includes appraisal of the potential value to the public of introducing a Public Services Ombudsman to replace the existing Jersey Complaints Panel.

Members of the public and local organisations have been invited to share their experiences of complaints against public services, whether or not they have formally complained against any, along with any experiences they may have of the Jersey Complaints Panel and other complaints review bodies.

Views are also being sought on preferences regarding the way complaints against public services should be handled and reviewed.

So far, over 160 responses have been received.

Deputy Scott said: “Any service provided to the community directly by government, or by external organisations funded or owned by government, can be regarded as a public service. Providers of public services include regulatory bodies, certain charities and utility providers and arms’ length organisations.

“I hope that anyone with experience or a view on the subject will participate in the survey, including users, public service providers, reviewing bodies and the legal community.

“Responses so far have covered a breadth of public services and areas of concern. I think it’s important to reassure the public that the policy officers who are managing the survey are based in a different area of government from the departments that deliver public services.

“I urge anyone who has had reason to complain about a public service to complete the survey form by the deadline, if they have not already done so, so that their personal experiences can be taken into account in the formulation of the proposals.”

When the consultation closes, a consultation report will be prepared and published that will inform the proposals.

Islanders can participate in the survey online, or collect a survey form from their Parish Hall, local library branch or the Citizens Advice Bureau.

Written submissions, comments or questions can be sent by email or post using the details below:

Public survey: Feedback on Public Services consultation

Email: adminredress@gov.je

Post: Strategic Policy, Planning and Performance, Government of Jersey, Union Street, St Helier, JE2 3DN.

MIL OSI United Kingdom –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Community Risk Register

Source: City of Sunderland

Communities across Northumberland and Tyne and Wear have access to plans to respond to flooding, wildfires and other major incidents thanks to a new Community Risk Register.

The Northumbria Local Resilience Forum (LRF) is a partnership made up of blue light services, local authorities, hospitals, health organisations and other public and private bodies across the North East.

Each region has its own LRF with the partnerships ensuring a co-ordinated and effective response to any incident or event that impacts on communities.

Much of the work takes place behind closed doors, with tests and exercises taking place among agencies to prepare their staff for any incident that may take place in our towns, cities and countryside.

That could be a mass power outages, storms, wildfire or a pandemic, among other high impact events or major incidents that could take place at any time.

The register includes details of those incidents identified as being of greater risk but also includes information on how communities themselves may prepare for them.

Chair of the Northumbria LRF, Chief Fire Officer Peter Heath of Tyne and Wear Fire and Rescue Service (TWFRS), said the pandemic and recent extreme weather events demonstrate the value in communities being prepared.

He said: “All the agencies represented in the LRF want to reassure our communities that we prepare for all eventualities and as a region our plans are well tested and co-ordinated.

“Whatever the incident, we will be there to prioritise risk to life and ensure those in need receive the appropriate response from the appropriate agency.

“In recent years we have seen Storm Arwen cause widespread disruption in our rural communities, wildfires lead to widespread destruction of nature reserves and a global pandemic that changed life as we know it.

“The LRF was at the heart of our regional response but these are incidents that impacted on all communities and each incident has taught us a lesson in it’s own right.

“One main theme is the preparedness of our communities, and how often residents will mobilise themselves to ensure the most vulnerable among us are supported. That community cohesion is what makes our region so great.

“Through the Community Risk Register residents can better prepare themselves for some of those high risk incidents.

“As a partnership, we will be communicating advice and guidance on those risks identified in the register throughout the year so keep your eyes out and help us keep our communities safe.”

You can find the Northumbria Community Risk Register on the Northumberland County Council website here: nland.uk/CRR

MIL OSI United Kingdom –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Russia: Engineers of meaning in discourses of strategic sovereignty

Translation. Region: Russian Federal

Source: Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University – Peter the Great St Petersburg Polytechnic University –

The 19th All-Russian scientific and practical conference “PR and Advertising Technologies in Modern Society” was held in the White Hall of the Polytechnic University. This year’s theme “Engineers of Meanings in Discourses of Strategic Sovereignty” was dedicated to the 80th anniversary of Victory in the Great Patriotic War.

The grand opening of the title conference of the Higher School of Media Communications and Public Relations of the Humanitarian Institute began with a minute of silence in memory of the fallen heroes. Then, the Vice-Rector for Youth Policy and Communication Technologies of SPbPU Maxim Pasholikov and the Director of the Humanitarian Institute Natalia Chicherina addressed the participants and guests of the event with words of welcome.

This year, the conference topic is unusually relevant. This is due to the fact that our university became the winner in the “Priority 2030” program (entered the first category) and today must solve very serious problems facing the entire country: to ensure the technological leadership of the country. Do humanities scholars have the opportunity to influence these processes? The answer is undoubtedly yes. The field of advertising and public relations itself is so technological today that it is difficult to separate it from the issues of achieving strategic and technological leadership, – noted Natalia Vasilievna.

Presenters Daria Shevchenko and Nikita Sokol, 1st and 3rd year students of the Advertising and Public Relations program, spoke about a special conference project – the art exhibition “Victory Day”, which was prepared by students and teachers of the Higher School of Music and Sociology of the State University of Culture.

Awarding the winners, the director of the Higher School of Music and Social Sciences Marina Arkannikova noted the level of professionalism of the works: Victory in the Great Patriotic War is one of the key events in the history of Russia and the entire Russian world. For all of us and for the country, Victory Day is a memory of the millions of those killed, a symbol of national unity, a tribute to veterans, historical memory and pride that we are obliged to pass on from generation to generation.

More than 300 experts from different countries participated in the business program. Plenary reports were presented by three scientists. Professor of the St. Petersburg State University, President of the Association of Public Relations Teachers Dmitry Gavra spoke about the concept of national communication sovereignty. Associate Professor, Director of the Higher School of Social Sciences and Public Relations, Member of the Expert Council of the State Duma Committee on Youth Policy Marina Arkannikova presented a report “Cultural Sovereignty in Development Discourses”. Member of the Executive Council of the Russian Public Relations Association, political consultant, media technologist Alena Avgust presented an unconventional approach to reading the 809th decree.

The plenary session left a strong impression on me. All three speakers demonstrated deeply developed topics on current communication problems in modern conditions. And although there was little “cross” discussion or controversy, I liked how the speakers consistently presented their positions. In general, the conference successfully combined theoretical depth with a practical focus, – noted first-year student of the Advertising and Public Relations program Irina Pyatnitskaya.

The work continued panel discussions “Engineers of meanings as subjects of memory politics and identity politics”, “Modern AI technologies in development discourses”, “80 years of Victory in the collective memory of generations”.

An important point of the business program of the second day was the round table “Synergistic wars in national discourses. Representation of the SVO in the politics of memory”, prepared jointly with the All-Russian Public Opinion Center (VTsIOM) and fighters of the special military operation. Participants discussed issues of the features of cognitive, mental wars, the preservation of historical memory and the formation of a communicative heritage about the SVO.

In addition, student sections were held for students, postgraduates and young scientists. The conference ended in the White Hall of SPbPU, where the evening “Engineers of Victory” was held, dedicated to the memory of polytechnicians – participants of the Great Patriotic War.

Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

MIL OSI Russia News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Russia: To the staff of the State Military-Historical Museum-Reserve “Prokhorovskoye Pole”

Translation. Region: Russian Federal

Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

April 26 marks the 30th anniversary of the founding of the Prokhorovskoye Pole Museum-Reserve.

Dear friends!

I congratulate you on the 30th anniversary of the State Military-Historical Museum-Reserve “Prokhorovskoye Pole”.

The memorial complex immortalized the military feat of the heroes who defended the freedom and independence of the country in the largest tank battle on the Kursk Bulge. It became a symbol of courage, fortitude and selfless service to the Fatherland.

All these years, the memory of the events of the Great Patriotic War, the valiant soldiers and officers who selflessly defended the Motherland have been carefully preserved here. Research and educational activities are carried out, large-scale exhibition projects are implemented. It is important that priority attention is given to the patriotic education of the younger generation. Thanks to the energy and creative work of the museum staff, dedicated professionals, thousands of visitors from different parts of Russia and neighboring countries can see genuine military relics, immerse themselves in the atmosphere of that time. Pay tribute to the fallen soldiers, to all who brought the Great Victory closer.

Your significant contribution to preserving historical truth is difficult to overestimate. It is of great importance to millions of people and deserves special recognition and sincere words of gratitude.

I wish you continued success and all the best.

M. Mishustin

Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

MIL OSI Russia News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Russia: Rosneft has developed a unique project of mobile complexes for northern fields

Translation. Region: Russian Federal

Source: Rosneft – Rosneft – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

Specialists from the Samara Scientific Institute, together with specialists from Kynsko-Chaselskoye Neftegaz and the Company’s gas block, have developed a project for the autonomous development of fields in northern latitudes using mobile complexes and polymer-reinforced pipelines.

The implementation of the project will allow the transportation of oil from the wells of the Russko-Rechenskoye field to the mobile acceptance and delivery point of the Tagulskoye field “RN-Vankor” (part of Rosneft).

All the project objects: well pads, oil treatment plant and acceptance point are mobile. Buildings and structures are installed on a special frame and do not require a deep foundation, which is very important in the conditions of northern latitudes. Utility overpasses are also assembled from ready-made modules supplied by the factory.

The infrastructure of the mobile complexes is connected by a flexible polymer-reinforced pipeline with a diameter of 150 mm and a length of over 50 kilometers, which is laid above the ground on special geomodules.

The use of modular mobile complexes significantly optimizes capital and operating costs, the timing of commissioning of the field, and also reduces the volume of construction and installation work on the site.

The design documentation for oil development, preparation and transportation facilities, developed by specialists from the Samara Institute, received a positive conclusion from the Main State Expertise of Russia. The project is currently at the construction stage, and commissioning is scheduled for 2025.

Successful completion of the pilot project will allow the optimal solutions adopted to be scaled to other Company facilities.

Department of Information and Advertising of PJSC NK Rosneft April 28, 2025

Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

MIL OSI Russia News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Russia: Rosneft develops virtual reality simulators for energy facilities

Translation. Region: Russian Federal

Source: Rosneft – Rosneft – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

Specialists from the corporate Samara scientific institute have created a VR model of the Gerasimovskaya substation of the Orenburgneft company (an extractive asset of Rosneft), which exactly replicates the real object. The introduction of the innovative development improves the quality of professional training of specialists.

The model contains a virtual simulator, on which possible scenarios of operational switching in various emergency situations are practiced. The simulator allows simulating a scenario in a virtual space, in which the trained specialist performs actions stipulated by the rules of labor protection and industrial safety.

Interactive models are made with the maximum level of detail and consist of 3D objects developed using a comprehensive information modeling and 3D design system. The development uses technologies that allow the trainee to move around the substation, interact with objects, and study the technological processes of the installations.

Digitalization in all areas of activity is one of the key elements of Rosneft’s strategy. The use of virtual reality opens up new technological opportunities that help improve the efficiency and safety of the energy sector.

Department of Information and Advertising of PJSC NK Rosneft April 28, 2025

Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

MIL OSI Russia News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: InvestHK unveils application details for Global Fast Track 2025
Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

Invest Hong Kong (InvestHK) announced that the eighth edition of the Global Fast Track (GFT) 2025 is now open for applications until September 21. This year, the programme will be expanded to include other verticals in addition to fintech, unleashing business opportunities for more technology companies in Hong Kong and worldwide. The year-long hybrid programme provides participants with one-on-one meetings, live pitching opportunities, mentorship, and tailored business matching with corporate clients, investors and service providers. A separate competition track will select semi-finalists from each vertical to pitch in person during the Hong Kong FinTech Week x StartmeupHK Festival 2025 in November, with the grand finale taking place at the main conference. Shortlisted companies will also have access to exclusive networking events during the week for potential partnerships.

The Global Head of Financial Services, FinTech & Sustainability at InvestHK, Mr King Leung, shared, “The Global Fast Track has grown into more than just a fintech-accelerating platform. The expansion into additional verticals beyond fintech reflects a growing trend of technology converging across multiple industries. To date, the GFT has supported over 1 000 fintech companies from more than 50 economies, helping them showcase cutting-edge innovations and expedite market entry into Hong Kong and beyond. We are thrilled to build on this success and continue to offer unparalleled access to a regional network of more than 120 investors, corporate and service champions, mentors, and industry leaders.”

The Head of Startups at InvestHK, Ms Jayne Chan, added, “It is exciting to see the expansion of this meaningful programme this year, as we welcome applications from verticals beyond fintech, including the newly dedicated ‘Innovation & Technology’ or deep tech vertical. Together, we aim to unlock the true potential of innovation across industries and provide a launchpad for transformative solutions. I look forward to welcoming high-calibre start-ups and scaleup applicants from around the world and witnessing the remarkable outcomes this programme will deliver.”

Explore the Seven Expanded Global Fast Track Verticals

The GFT 2025 includes seven key verticals, covering a broader range of categories than ever before:
- FinTech;
- Artificial Intelligence;
- GreenTech;
- Blockchain & Digital Assets;
- InsurTech & HealthTech;
- Innovation & Technology; and
- Mainland China Track (in Mandarin).
Glimpse of GFT 2025 Featured Partners

HKSTP Global Connect

For the GFT 2025, InvestHK is once again partnering with the Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation’s Global Connect Programme to support start-ups in expanding their presence in Hong Kong. The programme offers a comprehensive soft-landing package, including:
- Financial grants of up to HK$100,000;
- Access to co-working space;
- Investment and business matching;
- 1-on-1 consultations for setting up businesses in Hong Kong; and
- Training and networking.
Accenture FinTech Innovation Lab Asia-Pacific

Established by Accenture in collaboration with Hong Kong Cyberport, the FinTech Innovation Lab Asia-Pacific (FILAP) bridges growth-stage fintech start-ups with senior executives from world-leading financial institutions. Since its launch, FILAP alumni have collectively raised over US$1.1 billion in funding and developed 552 Proof of Concepts across nearly 90 companies. Through the GFT 2025, applicants will have the opportunity to fast-track to FILAP 2026 Interview Day, providing access to expert mentorship and exclusive connections to global financial leaders.

The GFT 2025 is an unparalleled opportunity for qualified innovators to showcase their profile in front of thousands of attendees and key corporates and investors looking for solutions and investment opportunities. Previous finalists have come from around the world, including Canada, France, Israel, Mainland China, Korea, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States.

For details of the entire programme of the GFT 2025 and the application process, please visit here.

MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –
April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Economics: Secretary-General of ASEAN receives the Deputy Foreign Minister of the Hellenic Republic

Source: ASEAN – Association of SouthEast Asian Nations

Secretary-General of ASEAN, Dr. Kao Kim Hourn, this afternoon received H.E. Alexandra Papadopoulou, Deputy Foreign Minister of the Hellenic Republic, at the ASEAN Headquarters/ASEAN Secretariat. The discussions evolved around finding ways to strengthen ASEAN-Greece relations in mutually beneficial areas, both bilaterally and within the framework of ASEAN-EU cooperation.

The post Secretary-General of ASEAN receives the Deputy Foreign Minister of the Hellenic Republic appeared first on ASEAN Main Portal.

MIL OSI Economics –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Universal Periodic Review 49: UK Statement on Kyrgyzstan
Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

Speech

Universal Periodic Review 49: UK Statement on Kyrgyzstan

Statement by the UK’s Permanent Representative to the WTO and UN, Simon Manley, at Kyrgyzstan’s Universal Periodic Review at the Human Rights Council in Geneva.
Let me welcome the Minister and his delegation, and salute his government’s efforts to implement the recommendations from its last review. Not least, we commend its efforts on gender equality and welcome their constructive role on this Council.

Let me also urge his Government to uphold its obligations under the ICCPR and the commitments accepted at its last review.
We recommend that the Kyrgyz Republic:

Ensure the treatment of NGOS is in line with international human rights obligations, and that it removes regulations for NGOS to provide information not stipulated by the ‘Law on Non-Commercial Organisations’.

Maintain the National Centre for the Prevention of Torture as an independent and separate National Preventative Mechanism and provide adequate resources to the Centre to continue to effectively carry out its mandate.

Adhere to the principles enshrined in the Kyrgyz Constitution by amending the Code of Offences to decriminalise defamation and insult, and instead use civil litigation in line with international human rights obligations.

Thank you, Mr President.

Updates to this page

Published 28 April 2025
MIL OSI United Kingdom –
April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Russia: HSE scientists learn to convert CO₂ into fuel without expensive reagents

Translation. Region: Russian Federal

Source: State University Higher School of Economics – State University Higher School of Economics –

Researchers MIEM HSE Together with Chinese scientists, they created a catalyst that helps convert carbon dioxide into formic acid more efficiently. Thanks to the carbon coating, it works stably in an acidic environment and with a minimum amount of potassium, although it was previously believed that the element was necessary in high concentrations. This will reduce the cost of gas processing, and also simplify its industrial use – for example, in the production of fuel for environmentally friendly types of transport. Study published in the journal Nature Communications.

Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide is a process in which gas is converted into other chemical compounds under the influence of electric current. It has long been considered not only as a way to utilize CO₂, but also as a source of valuable raw materials. For example, formic acid, which can be used as a liquid fuel, solvent or component for the chemical industry.

However, the electrochemical reduction of CO₂ has a problem: a side reaction releases hydrogen, which reduces the efficiency of the process. In alkaline solutions, this problem is solved by adding more potassium ions (K⁺), but this not only makes the process more expensive, but also leads to the formation of sediments that clog the installation and impair its operation. And if, on the contrary, an acidic environment is used, the catalysts quickly deteriorate and lose their efficiency.

A group of researchers, including specialists from MIEM HSE, proposed an alternative approach. They developed a catalyst that works stably in an acidic environment with a minimum amount of potassium. Its base is indium oxide (In₂O₃), covered with a thin layer of carbon.

First, using computer modeling, MIEM employees found out how to control the distribution of ions on the catalyst surface. The model showed that the carbon coating not only protects the catalyst from destruction, but also forms an electric field that holds potassium ions near its surface. Thanks to this, potassium does not precipitate, and unwanted side reactions are suppressed.

To test the model’s predictions, Chinese scientists synthesized indium oxide nanoparticles and coated them with a thin layer of carbon. They then conducted a series of experiments in an electrolyte reactor. They used a highly acidic environment and several times less potassium than in traditional systems. Tests showed that even under such conditions, the catalyst remained stable: it remained active for more than 100 hours, while the efficiency of converting CO₂ into formic acid was 98.9%.

“We have managed to show that it is possible to abandon the excess potassium, which complicates the operation of the system. This approach made the process cheaper, and the catalyst itself more stable,” comments MIEM HSE Associate Professor Liu Dongyu.

To make sure that the carbon coating was indeed the culprit, the researchers conducted additional tests. They found that without the coating, indium oxide quickly reduced to metallic indium, which was much less effective at electrochemically reducing CO₂. This confirmed that it was the carbon layer that protected the catalyst, preventing it from deteriorating.

The method not only simplifies the technology of carbon dioxide processing, but also makes it more accessible for industrial use. Unlike traditional alkaline systems, it does not require a high concentration of potassium and eliminates the formation of sediments. The introduction of the technology into real installations can make carbon dioxide processing more environmentally friendly.

“We have made the process more stable and convenient for scaling, which means we have brought the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide closer to application in real production,” comments Andrey Vasenko, professor at MIEM HSE. “The technology can be useful not only for the synthesis of formic acid, but also for other processes related to the processing of CO₂.”

Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

MIL OSI Russia News –

April 28, 2025
MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: External merchandise trade statistics for March 2025

Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

External merchandise trade statistics for March 2025
In March 2025, the value of total exports of goods increased by 18.5% over a year earlier to $455.5 billion, after a year-on-year increase by 15.4% in February 2025. Concurrently, the value of imports of goods increased by 16.6% over a year earlier to $500.9 billion in March 2025, after a year-on-year increase by 11.8% in February 2025. A visible trade deficit of $45.4 billion, equivalent to 9.1% of the value of imports of goods, was recorded in March 2025.

For the first quarter of 2025 as a whole, the value of total exports of goods increased by 10.9% over the same period in 2024. Concurrently, the value of imports of goods increased by 9.8%. A visible trade deficit of $80.7 billion, equivalent to 6.4% of the value of imports of goods, was recorded in the first quarter of 2025.

Comparing the first quarter of 2025 with the preceding quarter on a seasonally adjusted basis, the value of total exports of goods increased by 12.7%. Meanwhile, the value of imports of goods increased by 9.9%.

Analysis by country/territory

Comparing March 2025 with March 2024, total exports to Asia as a whole grew by 22.4%. In this region, increases were registered in the values of total exports to some major destinations, in particular Taiwan (+61.3%), Malaysia (+57.3%), Vietnam (+41.3%), the Philippines (+34.5%) and the mainland of China (the Mainland) (+25.4%). On the other hand, a decrease was recorded in the value of total exports to Korea (-22.8%).

Apart from destinations in Asia, increases were registered in the values of total exports to some major destinations in other regions, in particular the United Kingdom (+48.5%) and the USA (+11.4%). On the other hand, a decrease was recorded in the value of total exports to the Netherlands (-29.0%).

Over the same period of comparison, increases were registered in the values of imports from some major suppliers, in particular Vietnam (+95.1%), Taiwan (+75.8%), the United Kingdom (+55.6%), Malaysia (+46.9%) and the Mainland (+7.4%). On the other hand, a decrease was recorded in the value of imports from Korea (-21.0%).

For the first quarter of 2025 as a whole, increases were registered in the values of total exports to some major destinations, in particular Vietnam (+69.1%), Taiwan (+40.6%) and the Mainland (+16.2%). On the other hand, decreases were recorded in the values of total exports to the United Arab Emirates (-36.9%) and India (-20.2%).

Over the same period of comparison, increases were registered in the values of imports from some major suppliers, in particular Vietnam (+68.9%), the United Kingdom (+57.4%), Taiwan (+53.9%), Malaysia (+47.6%) and the Mainland (+4.1%). On the other hand, a decrease was recorded in the value of imports from Korea (-23.6%).

Analysis by major commodity

Comparing March 2025 with March 2024, increases were registered in the values of total exports of some principal commodity divisions, in particular “office machines and automatic data processing machines” (by $51.2 billion or +133.5%) and “electrical machinery, apparatus and appliances, and electrical parts thereof” (by $20.8 billion or +11.1%).

Over the same period of comparison, increases were registered in the values of imports of some principal commodity divisions, in particular “office machines and automatic data processing machines” (by $44.4 billion or +130.8%) and “electrical machinery, apparatus and appliances, and electrical parts thereof” (by $22.2 billion or +11.5%).

For the first quarter of 2025 as a whole, increases were registered in the values of total exports of some principal commodity divisions, in particular “office machines and automatic data processing machines” (by $86.7 billion or +82.6%) and “electrical machinery, apparatus and appliances, and electrical parts thereof” (by $43.3 billion or +8.6%). On the other hand, a decrease was registered in the value of total exports of “telecommunications and sound recording and reproducing apparatus and equipment” (by $12.1 billion or -9.0%).

Over the same period of comparison, increases were registered in the values of imports of some principal commodity divisions, in particular “office machines and automatic data processing machines” (by $74.8 billion or +91.1%) and “electrical machinery, apparatus and appliances, and electrical parts thereof” (by $52.4 billion or +10.6%). On the other hand, a decrease was registered in the value of imports of “non-metallic mineral manufactures” (by $10.0 billion or -24.0%).

Commentary

A Government spokesman said that the value of merchandise exports grew sharply by 18.5% in March over a year earlier. Exports to the Mainland grew strongly, while those to other major Asian economies showed mixed performance. Exports to the United States increased visibly, and those to the European Union registered a marginal increase.

Looking ahead, global trade tensions have escalated abruptly due to the significant increases in tariffs by the United States in early April. This will pose challenges to Hong Kong’s merchandise trade performance. Nevertheless, the steady growth in the Mainland economy, together with Hong Kong’s proactive efforts in enhancing economic and trade ties with different markets, should help buttress trade performance. The Government has been providing support to enterprises through various measures in coping with the external challenges, and will monitor the situation closely.

Further information

Table 1 presents the analysis of external merchandise trade statistics for March 2025. Table 2 presents the original monthly trade statistics from January 2022 to March 2025, and Table 3 gives the seasonally adjusted series for the same period.

The values of total exports of goods to 10 main destinations for March 2025 are shown in Table 4, whereas the values of imports of goods from 10 main suppliers are given in Table 5.

Tables 6 and 7 show the values of total exports and imports of 10 principal commodity divisions for March 2025.

All the merchandise trade statistics described here are measured at current prices and no account has been taken of changes in prices between the periods of comparison. A separate analysis of the volume and price movements of external merchandise trade for March 2025 will be released in mid-May 2025.

The March 2025 issue of “Hong Kong External Merchandise Trade” contains detailed analysis on the performance of Hong Kong’s external merchandise trade in March 2025 and will be available in early May 2025. Users can browse and download the report at the website of the C&SD (www.censtatd.gov.hk/en/EIndexbySubject.html?pcode=B1020005&scode=230
Enquiries on merchandise trade statistics may be directed to the Trade Analysis Section of the C&SD (Tel: 2582 4691).
Issued at HKT 16:30

NNNN

CategoriesMIL-OSI

MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

April 28, 2025