NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: Health

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Reforms – PSA forces changes to restructure of Data & Digital and Pacific Health

    Source: PSA

    The PSA has settled litigation over the planned restructure of two key teams at Health NZ with an agreement to significantly amend planned cuts to roles and structures.
    The settlement relates to proposed restructures of the Data and Digital and Pacific Health teams at Health New Zealand Te Whatu Ora which were subject to litigation before the Employment Relations Authority set down for 22 April 2025.
    “We’re pleased the PSA’s legal action has resulted in a reversal of the some of the planned deep and damaging cuts, but we remain concerned that the cuts across the health system have already gone too far and too wide,” said Fleur Fitzsimons, National Secretary for the Public Service Association for Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi.
    “This is ultimately all about patient care. Both teams play critical roles in ensuring the health system delivers for patients and communities and supports clinicians to do their job, so it was important changes were made.
    “But it shouldn’t have taken legal action for Health NZ Te Whatu Ora to listen to what health workers were telling it about the risks to patient care and community health.”
    Data and Digital staff ensure clinicians can access patient records 24/7, maintain ageing legacy systems, and are integrating new nationwide IT systems. Health NZ had been planning to almost halve the workforce including not filling hundreds of vacant roles.
    “Our legal action has resulted in 175 roles being added back into these teams and for contractor roles to be available to employees and could mean that no staff are forced to be made redundant. This is positive as these people have skills our health system desperately needs.
    “We reached a settlement because Health NZ was shedding too many highly skilled IT workers through early exit allowed under the restructure. We had to stop the bleed as these workers were critical to ensuring patient care was not put at risk from IT systems failing.
    “While the settlement is welcome, the PSA is disappointed the Privacy Commissioner has refused to investigate cuts to Data and Digital given the risks to sensitive patient information and our concerns remain.”
    For Pacific Health, a smaller reduction in the full-time workforce has been agreed with a net 22 roles going compared to 50 in the original proposal though many of the people affected will have priority for similar roles within Heath New Zealand. This is not ideal, but the unions feedback was taken on board including retaining regional partnerships and protecting some crucial administration roles. In addition, some workers, previously facing redundancy, will be redeployed elsewhere in the health system so they can carry on their important work.
    “Today’s settlement underscores the value of a union taking on an employer which is following the Government’s direction to cut the health system regardless of the consequences.
    “There are still other teams that are subject to restructuring – Health NZ is still under instruction from the Government to cut spending and the PSA is seeking legal advice about filing litigation against these proposals too.
    “These constant cuts are not a recipe for a health system that properly delivers the timely and effective health care New Zealanders expect and the PSA will be strongly resisting all further cuts.”
    Background on litigation
    The PSA filed legal proceedings in the Employment Relations Authority in February because several proposed restructures breached the Code of Good Faith for the public health sector, the Employment Relations Act 2000, collective agreements and Te Mauri o Rongo – NZ Health Charter.
    Last month the PSA agreed a settlement with Health NZ stopping the restructuring of the National Public Health Service and two directorates in the Planning Funding and Outcomes business unit – Data and Analytics and Community Mental Health Funding and Investment
    Litigation remains in place for two other business units of Planning Funding and Outcomes – Procurement and Supply Chain and Systems Improvement and Innovation.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Underwood, Fetterman, Sherrill, Titus, Cherfilus-McCormick Lead Legislation to Improve Access to Contraception

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Lauren Underwood (IL-14)

    Representatives Lauren Underwood (IL-14), Mikie Sherrill (NJ-11), Dina Titus (NV-01), Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (FL-20), and Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) introduced the Convenient Contraception Act, legislation that would improve access to contraceptive products, including over-the-counter contraceptives. The bill provides individuals covered by private health coverage with the option to receive a full year of contraception when their prescription is issued—an evidence-based policy that improves health outcomes—instead of the current three-month supply that is standard in many states.

    “Expanding access to contraception is a critical part of protecting the health and lives of millions of women who have seen their access to care jeopardized by extreme Republicans’ attacks on reproductive freedom,” said Congresswoman Lauren Underwood. “Contraception is essential health care, and it must remain easily available nationwide.” 

    “I will always fight to protect a woman’s right to make her own health care decisions. This bill would allow patients to pick up their full prescriptions at once, improving access to contraception by simply making it more convenient,” said Senator John Fetterman. “This is a commonsense solution, and I’m proud to lead this legislation to make contraception access more equitable.”

    “I am proud to co-lead this bicameral legislation to ensure women can pick up a full year prescription of contraceptives at once, rather than just three months at a time,” said Congresswoman Mikie Sherill. “As Donald Trump and Washington Republicans take aim at women’s health nationwide, it’s critically important that we continue to push forward in our fight to protect health care, preserve women’s rights and freedoms, and empower women to make their own decisions about their bodies.”

    “I’m proud to join Sen. Fetterman and Rep. Underwood in the effort to make contraception more accessible, especially as the GOP continues to attack women’s freedoms from every angle,” said Congresswoman Dina Titus. “Southern Nevadans have made clear for decades that reproductive rights are a top priority, and this commonsense legislation would make a simple but critical fix to expand access and reduce racial disparities in care.”

    “The ability to purchase contraception should be seamless and hassle-free, but that hasn’t been the case for far too many women,” said Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick. “The Convenient Contraception Act is a common-sense solution to the financial and logistical hurdles that stand in the way of comprehensive reproductive health care.”

    Currently, many health coverage plans require a patient to pick up their contraception prescription multiple times during their prescription, creating an unnecessary burden and increasing the likelihood of gaps in protection. The Convenient Contraception Act requires insurers to permit individuals covered by private health coverage plans to pick up a full-year prescription supply at once and prohibits coverage plans from charging additional costs for a one-year supply.

    Removing barriers to contraception can help reduce racial and ethnic disparities in access to care and decrease the likelihood of unintended pregnancies, which have been linked to adverse health effects, including maternal depression, intimate partner violence, low birth weight, and preterm birth.

    The Convenient Contraception Act is endorsed by American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Catholics for Choice; Contraceptive Access Initiative; Every Mother Counts; In Our Own Voice: National Black Women’s Reproductive Justice Agenda; MomsRising; NARAL Pro-Choice America; National Council of Jewish Women; National Family Planning & Reproductive Health Association; National Partnership for Women & Families; National Women’s Law Center; Physicians for Reproductive Health; Planned Parenthood Federation of America; Power to Decide; and What to Expect Project.

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Golden praises President Trump’s fishing executive order, urges action on unfair Canadian trade and regulatory practices

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Jared Golden (ME-02)

    WASHINGTON — Congressman Jared Golden (ME-02) today sent a letter to President Donald Trump highlighting the unfair trade practices and regulatory disparity Canada uses to benefit its lobster industry at the expense of American lobstermen. Golden’s letter follows yesterday’s executive order directing the Secretary of Commerce and U.S. Trade Representative to address regulatory mismanagement informed by scientific uncertainty — a task Golden requested of the administration in a letter just last week and praised last night.

    “Throughout my time in the Maine State Legislature and Congress, I have heard from Maine’s seafood harvesters, processors, and those involved in the ocean economy that they cannot make the necessary investments to grow due to overregulation, arbitrary and capricious management, inconsistent policies from various federal agencies, and unfair trade action from Canada,” Golden wrote in his letter today. “Without your intervention, projections indicate that many commercial fishing operations in New England will become economically unviable within the next 30 years. This would lead to the collapse of a historic food production industry, the loss of thousands of jobs, the devastation of coastal communities that have shaped American maritime heritage for centuries, and an increased reliance on foreign food.”

    Discussing the unequal regulatory burden between the U.S. and Canada, Golden explained that Canadian lobstermen are not required to follow the same conservation measures, like releasing lobsters over a maximum size, that American lobstermen must. He also cited extensive regulations on American fishing gear and environmental practices that are absent in Canada; this burden is especially visible in the Gray Zone — 277 square miles fished by both Mainers and Canadians that remains one of America’s only contested maritime borders.

    Golden equally criticized market manipulation by Canadian seafood processors and expansive subsidies from the Canadian government to undercut the cost of competing American labor. 

    What they’re saying

    “The New England Fishermen’s Stewardship Association (NEFSA) commends Congressman Jared Golden for highlighting the significant disparities faced by American lobstermen compared to their Canadian counterparts in his recent letter to the President. NEFSA has made it a top priority to raise awareness of the longstanding territorial dispute in the Gray Zone and the resulting economic and environmental consequences. Unbalanced regulatory frameworks between the United States and Canada continue to place American fishermen at a disadvantage—both in terms of access to seafood stocks and financial sustainability. We are encouraged by Congressman Golden’s advocacy and remain committed to working collaboratively with him, the White House, and NOAA to address these challenges and secure a fair and equitable future for American fishing communities,” saidDustin Delano, former lobstermen and chief operating officer of the New England Fishermen’s Stewardship Association.

    “The Maine Lobstering Union is thrilled President Trump is looking into imbalances in the US fisheries. Maine fishermen have been supporting Maine’s economy for generations. We continue to raise concerns that Canadian trade practices, unequal conservation, and regulations are hurting Maine families, and it is rewarding to see some of that noise is making its way to President Trump. We commend Representative Golden for working across the aisle. Representative Golden continues to deliver on his promise to put Mainers first. Families in Maine are struggling, and putting our state’s needs above all else is very refreshing,” said Virginia Olsen, lobstermen and director of the Maine Lobstering Union.

    “The Maine Lobstermen’s Association (MLA) is grateful to President Trump for his commitment to making U.S. fisheries great again by allowing us to do what we do best — go fishing! The MLA has been fighting government over-regulation for years and won a historic court case that challenged draconian whale rules taking a big step forward in ending this abuse of power. The President’s executive order recognizes the challenges our fishing families and communities face and we appreciate the commitment to reduce burdensome regulations and strengthen the competitiveness of American seafood. We especially appreciate the Administration’s commitment to protecting the Maine lobster industry which is vital to the economy of our state and our coastal economies,” saidPatrice McCarron, executive director of the Maine Lobstermen’s Association.

    BACKGROUND

    Golden, who recently secured a seat on the House Natural Resources Committee, has fought fiercely on behalf of Maine’s fishing industry throughout his career as a lawmaker. In addition to his letter last week, he has pressed multiple administrations on the unequal regulations and unfair trade practices harming Maine lobstermen.

    Over the last year he has been the only representative from New England to join the effort to overturn a U.S.-only increase to the minimum catchable size of lobster, and helped pass a 6-year pause on new gear regulations in 2022.  His bipartisan Northern Fisheries Heritage Protection Act would also prohibit commercial offshore wind energy development in the critical, highly productive Maine fishing grounds of Lobster Management Area 1 — an issue he has been consistently outspoken on. 

    Golden’s letter can be found here and is included below in full:

    +++

    April 18, 2025

    The Honorable Donald J. Trump
    President of the United States
    The White House
    1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
    Washington, D.C. 20500

    Dear President Trump,

    In your executive order on “Restoring American Seafood Competitiveness,” you directed the Secretary of Commerce to consider suspending, revising, or rescinding regulations that overly burden America’s commercial fishing industries and the United States Trade Representative to examine other nations’ trade practices. As part of those investigations, I write in support of swift and decisive action to address the unequal regulatory burden between Maine and Canadian lobstermen and the unfair trade practices used by Canada and its lobster industry at the expense of the American lobster industry. 

    Throughout my time in the Maine State Legislature and Congress, I have heard from Maine’s seafood harvesters, processors, and those involved in the ocean economy that they cannot make the necessary investments to grow due to overregulation, arbitrary and capricious management, inconsistent policies from various federal agencies, and unfair trade action from Canada. Action to address the unequal regulatory burden between American and Canadian lobstermen and end Canada’s unfair trade practices in the lobster industry is squarely in line with your fisheries executive order and your administration’s “America First Trade Policy.” Any ensuing changes should be made in consultation with those who know the industry best, the harvesters themselves. 

    The American lobster fishery extends from Maine to Cape Hatteras, North Carolina. In 2022, commercial landings of American lobster totaled 119 million pounds, valued at $515 million, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries. Maine has been at the forefront of American lobster landings for over three decades, and 93 percent of the coast-wide landings come from the Gulf of Maine lobster stock. 

    While I have written to your administration and previous administrations extensively about each issue, I want to highlight the following issues: 

    Unequal Regulatory Burden Between the U.S. and Canada:  

    Regulations are frustratingly inconsistent between the U.S. and Canada, significantly benefiting Canadian fishermen and actively harming U.S. fishermen. While the long-term viability of lobster stocks is essential for the economic success of American and Canadian harvesters, it is American fishermen and lobstermen who are required to adhere to the strictest conservation standards, whereas Canadian fishermen are not. Below is a list of the top issues causing an uneven regulatory playing field:  

    Maximum Size Limit: American lobstermen are required to follow a maximum size limit for harvesting lobster, and Canadian lobstermen do not.

    Whale Regulations: Since 2001, U.S. lobstermen have been required to comply with whale regulations, including new requirements for gear marking, breakaways, weak ropes, and inserts, as well as changes to trawl length due to the NOAA Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan. This plan was developed and implemented in response to the Marine Mammal Protection Act despite limited evidence linking Maine fishermen to whale deaths.

    These requirements increased costs and safety risks for U.S. fishermen. Canadian lobstermen do not face these same restrictions. For instance, U.S. fishermen must use whale-safe gear, which incurs additional costs, to protect whales that frequently transit through Canadian and American waters. Meanwhile, Canadian fishermen continue to fish with floating rope, which costs nearly 50% less than traditional methods. 

    If pending federal rules regulating even more restrictive gear requirements are implemented, American fishermen will face an even more significant competitive disadvantage. They would be forced to use untested, less efficient, more expensive equipment, while Canada’s gear would be untouched. 

    Gray Zone: The 277 square miles of ocean between the U.S. and Canada – commonly referred to as the Gray Zone – have been claimed by both countries since the Revolutionary War. For centuries, the lobstermen and fishermen of Downeast Maine have relied on the Gray Zone to harvest lobster, scallop, and halibut, often competing with their Canadian counterparts who utilize these same fishing grounds. 

    The disparity between the United States and Canadian fishing regulations in the Gray Zone not only escalates tensions among fishermen but also poses a serious threat to the future of an industry that has supported Maine families for generations. These concerning trends would only worsen if our federal regulators approved a new minimum allowable catch size for lobster starting in July 2025, without comparable restrictions for Canadian lobstermen enforced by their government. 

    Maine’s seafood harvesters have been waiting too long for a resolution to the Gray Zone, with significant consequences for their safety, businesses, and the natural resources they depend on. 

    A 2023 Department of State Report written for Congress titled “Progress Toward an Agreement with Canadian Officials Addressing Territorial Disputes and Collecting Fisheries Management Measures in the Gulf of Maine” incorrectly states:

    “The status quo benefits the United States by keeping the Gray Zone aligned with the more favorable measures applicable to the broader U.S. lobster management area within which it sits. Current cooperation has proved effective in managing the area. Negotiations to resolve the dispute would require significant dedicated resources. In the absence of a resolution of the territorial dispute, an agreement to resolve differing fisheries management measures in the Gray Zone could impact U.S. claims to sovereignty by creating regulations that differ from those applicable to the broader Gulf of Maine jurisdiction in which the Gray Zone lies.”

    The truth is that, as management currently exists, there is no cooperation in managing this area. This report is misleading, and American fishermen fishing in the Gray Zone will tell you that the uneven regulatory burden in the area does not benefit American fishermen; it hurts them. 

    Environmental Regulations: Canada has considerably fewer environmental regulations compared to U.S. processors. For example, Canadian processors can directly discharge wastewater into the ocean and spread shells in fields. In the U.S., processors must pay thousands of dollars to local municipalities for wastewater user fees and waste disposal.

    Unfair Trade Practices Utilized by the Canadian Lobster Industry at the Expense of the American Lobster Industry: 

    Canadian Subsidies:The Canadian Government uses labor and business subsidies to boost their lobster industry at the expense of the American lobster industry.    

    Since 1984, the Canada Health Act (CHA) gives all Canadians publicly funded single-payer healthcare insurance. This program gives all Canadian residents reasonable access to medically necessary hospital and physician services without paying out-of-pocket. To highlight the disparity, U.S. fishermen who buy a health insurance plan on HealthCare.gov would pay, on average, $456 per month more for insurance premiums, which is $5,472 per year more than Canadian fishermen.

    Canadian single-payer healthcare insurance also creates an impact on unemployment premiums. Under the Canadian system, workers’ compensation largely drives costs through lost earnings and wage-loss benefits. This causes U.S. fishermen to pay higher unemployment premiums. This distinction comes from their healthcare system, which incurs fewer administrative expenses and lower healthcare costs that affect an employer’s experience rating. 

    The Canadian lobster industry also has access to unlimited foreign labor and, as a result, low-wage workers. They provide salary subsidies covering up to 60% of the salary for immigrants or visible minority hires, up to a maximum equivalent to the current minimum wage of 40 hours per week. The Canadian government also makes major investments in training programs for the workforce and worker subsidy initiatives. For instance, their Summer Jobs wage subsidy offers financial support for summer employment and visas for foreign workers through the Temporary Foreign Workers Program (TFWP) allows Canadian processors to bring unlimited overseas workers during peak seasons to fill labor shortages.

    Canada also utilizes infrastructure, innovation, and business operation subsidies to boost their lobster industry at the expense of the American industry. Through the Atlantic Fisheries Fund (AFF) and Quebec Fisheries Fund (QFF), Canadian fisheries receive substantial subsidies to support their infrastructure, innovation, and businessoperations. The AFF and QFF are financed 70% by the federal government and 30% by the provincial governments. They are managed by the Canada Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO), which aims to enhance opportunities and market value for sustainably sourced, high-quality fish and seafood products from Atlantic Canada. A recent announcement from the Canadian DFO indicated that it will invest over $400 million over seven years to support Canada’s fish and seafood sector. In the US, industry-based and driven science partnerships are limited and frequently funded by the industry.

    Market manipulation: Canadian processors are engaging in currency arbitrage and exploiting market conditions. For instance, in the U.S., we pay roughly $20 per hour at our processing plants. Canada pays the same $20 per hour. Canadian processors factor the hourly wage into the production of processed lobster. They produce the product in Canada and then sell it back to the U.S. The exchange rate does not favor U.S. processors because of the strength of the U.S. dollar, which makes imports to the U.S. cheaper and exports more expensive.

    Without your intervention, projections indicate that many commercial fishing operations in New England will become economically unviable within the next 30 years. This would lead to the collapse of a historic food production industry, the loss of thousands of jobs, the devastation of coastal communities that have shaped American maritime heritage for centuries, and an increased reliance on foreign food. Addressing the unequal regulatory burden and unfair Canadian fishing and trade practices aligns strongly with your executive order on restoring America’s seafood competitiveness and America First Trade Policy and would ensure that American workers and businesses can compete on a level playing field.

    The United States should take all necessary steps to ensure that our fishermen and processors do not face a competitive disadvantage or miss out on economic opportunities because of unequal regulatory burden and unfair fishing and trade practices by Canada. I urge you to investigate Canada’s unfair trade and fishing practices and work with the American lobster industry to intervene with solutions to level the playing field.

     

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Hassan Calls Out HHS Secretary Kennedy for Hiring Fraudster to Relitigate Long-Disproven Theories

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New Hampshire Maggie Hassan

    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Maggie Hassan (D-NH) is calling out Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s reported decision to hire David Geier, an individual with a history of practicing medicine without a license, to relitigate long-disproven links between vaccines and autism.

    Senator Hassan is urging Secretary Kennedy to fire Mr. Geier and to invest in the work of qualified scientists at HHS who are advancing research on autism rather than waste taxpayer dollars by hiring fraudsters like Mr. Geier to push baseless theories. Senator Hassan’s push comes as Secretary Kennedy held an event last Wednesday about the importance of finding the cause of autism – during which he made disparaging comments about children with autism – despite the fact that the Trump Administration is actively defunding the health research that has built years of expertise and evidence towards better understanding autism.

    “David Geier has directly endangered the lives of children, and he does not belong at a government agency that oversees the health of more than 70 million American children,” wrote Senator Hassan. “David Geier was disciplined by the State of Maryland in 2012 for endangering children’s health by falsely diagnosing and treating medical conditions in children with autism without a medical license.” 

    “You have reportedly selected David Geier to lead a scientific study relitigating a baseless link between vaccines and autism. Mr. Geier has no qualifications to lead such a study, and decades of rigorous scientific research – studies that have included more than one million children – have shown again and again that childhood vaccines and autism are not linked,” Senator Hassan continued. 

    “As you hire David Geier, the United States is facing a growing measles outbreak that has sickened nearly 500 children and led to dozens being hospitalized,” Senator Hassan emphasized. “To protect the health of children, and to abide by your stated goals of advancing gold-standard science, I urge you to terminate Mr. Geier’s employment.” 

    Click here to see the full letter or see text below: 

    Dear Secretary Kennedy:

    I write to express my grave concern regarding your decision to hire David Geier, a vaccine cynic and fraudster, to study a long-debunked theory that vaccines are linked to autism. Mr. Geier not only lacks any scientific qualifications, but he has a track record of harming children and manipulating data to fit his disproven conspiracy theories about vaccine safety. I urge you to protect the health of children in the United States and immediately remove this individual from the Department.

    David Geier has directly endangered the lives of children, and he does not belong at a government agency that oversees the health of more than 70 million American children. David Geier was disciplined by the State of Maryland in 2012 for endangering children’s health by falsely diagnosing and treating medical conditions in children with autism without a medical license. David Geier’s father, Dr. Mark Geier, was previously a doctor in Maryland and lost his medical license after parents reported that both Geiers were endangering children with autism by administering quack treatments that were not evidence-based. For example, the Geiers administered a potent medication called Lupron, a testosterone-suppressant approved for prostate cancer and ovarian fibroids, to children with autism, despite these children having no diagnosed conditions that would necessitate this treatment. In other instances, David Geier – who has no medical license or scientific training – performed an ultrasound on a child, falsified medical diagnoses, and ordered more than 20 blood tests for a child.

    You have reportedly selected David Geier to lead a scientific study relitigating a baseless link between vaccines and autism. Mr. Geier has no qualifications to lead such a study, and decades of rigorous scientific research – studies that have included more than one million children – have shown again and again that childhood vaccines and autism are not linked. Decades of scientific studies supported by the NIH suggest that both genetic factors and environmental factors may contribute to childhood autism. I urge you to continue investing in this promising research, and to not waste taxpayer dollars to advance Mr. Geier’s pre-conceived conspiracy theories about vaccines.

    As you hire David Geier, the United States is facing a growing measles outbreak that has sickened nearly 500 children and led to dozens being hospitalized. Based on decades of research and scientific consensus, medical professionals recommend the MMR vaccine to provide children with strong protection from measles infection. To protect the health of children, and to abide by your stated goals of advancing gold-standard science, I urge you to terminate Mr. Geier’s employment.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Breakthrough in bowel cancer research will speed up diagnosis

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Breakthrough in bowel cancer research will speed up diagnosis

    Government backs world-leading trial of cutting-edge technology to diagnose bowel cancer earlier, harnessing the power of technology to treat patients.

    Patients could soon benefit from world-leading technology to diagnose bowel cancer earlier, faster and cheaper, reducing the need for invasive colonoscopies and biopsies, and potentially saving valuable time and resource for the NHS, the government has announced today (Wednesday 23rd April).  

    The technology, made on British soil by Xgenera, in collaboration with the University of Southampton, has the potential to detect bowel cancer earlier, improving diagnosis rates, and offering patients valuable time back to treat the disease faster and more effectively.     

    Bowel cancer is the UK’s fourth most common cancer, with over 42,000 people diagnosed each year. Early diagnosis is crucial, with 9 in 10 people surviving bowel cancer when it’s detected at stage 1, compared to just 1 in 10 when diagnosed at stage 4.      

    This government is driving forward improvements to cancer care through the Plan for Change to fix our NHS – including by improving waiting times for lower gastrointestinal diagnosis. From July 2024 to February 2025, 76.6% of patients have received their cancer diagnosis or all clear within 28 days, an increase of 4ppt compared to the previous year. 

    Today’s announcement comes as the Health and Social Care Secretary is set to visit a research lab funded by Cancer Research UK, which has been renamed in memory of campaigner Dame Deborah James.       

    The BowelBabe Laboratory will bring together leading scientists to advance our understanding of bowel cancer. It will conduct cutting-edge research and will aid in the development of new treatments for bowel cancer.       

    Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Wes Streeting, said:   

    From my own experience, I know the devastating toll cancer can take on patients and families, and how many of them have been faced with long waiting lists to get the diagnosis and treatment they deserve.  

    We know that the key to surviving cancer is catching it as early as possible, so this government is taking the urgent action needed to make sure that happens through our Plan for Change, from developing world leading technology to detect bowel cancer earlier, through to setting up hubs for the UK’s top scientists to research and treat the disease.   

    Dame Deborah James dedicated her life to raising awareness for cancer and finding ways that we can beat it, so it is only right that we honour her legacy by investing in research to help stop one of the country’s biggest killers.  

    And research is only one part of the work we’re doing. Our National Cancer Plan will transform cancer so patients can get the latest treatments and technology, ultimately bringing this country’s cancer survival rates back up to some of the best in the world. 

    Professor Lucy Chappell, Chief Scientific Adviser at the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) and Chief Executive Officer of the NIHR said:  

    Innovations such as the mIONCO-Dx blood test offer an exciting new era in cancer detection with the potential for quicker, easier and more effective ways to detect cancers before they become more difficult to treat.  

    The NIHR is supporting initiatives such as these, utilising the latest technologies such as AI, to provide patients and the public with timely, accurate and easily accessible options. Supporting the UK’s thriving life sciences sector is key to seeing these strides in diagnosis and early prevention.

    In collaboration with the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR), the government has awarded £2.4m to progress the development of the AI-driven blood test, known as miONCO-Dx. The test was developed on data from over 20,000 patients and has since been translated into a cheaper, faster and more scalable solution, marking a significant step forward. This new solution will be assessed in a clinical trial of 8,000 patients, giving a formal and significant step towards bringing the test closer to patients by ensuring it is fit for purpose in the NHS.

    The test works by measuring the microRNA in a blood sample and using AI to identify if cancer is present and if so, where it is located in the body.  Initial tests have produced promising results, having shown that it is able to detect 12 of the most lethal and common cancers, including bowel cancer, at an early stage, with over 99% accuracy. With no other trial currently working in the same way, this a world-leader and will support in placing Britain at the forefront of revolutionising healthcare.    

    The simple blood test will be able to identify cancer earlier, where treatment is not only more effective, but also cheaper and easier, potentially freeing up valuable NHS resources and staffing time in the long run. 

    Bowel cancer can be difficult to detect in the early stages, and survivability drops significantly as the disease progresses, as treatment options become more limited. Investing in technologies that can support experts to detect cancer early, such as the miONCO-Dx, is an essential first step in reducing the lives lost by cancer.    

    Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, said 

    Bowel cancer is the second biggest cause of cancer deaths in the UK. I’m delighted to welcome the Health Secretary, Wes Streeting, to the Bowelbabe Laboratory and show him the cutting-edge research being carried out in the name of the inspirational Dame Deborah James. She touched the lives of so many, and her legacy is supporting people affected by bowel cancer across the country. 

    This NIHR trial shows the importance of research and the impact new technology and developments could have. The upcoming National Cancer Plan for England is an opportunity for the UK Government to improve the lives of not just bowel cancer patients, but all cancer patients. We will continue to work with them on this. 

    Professor Sir Stephen Powis, NHS national medical director, said:  

    This blood test has the potential to help us detect bowel cancer earlier and reduce the need for invasive tests, and the next step in this trial will now be vital in gathering further evidence on its effectiveness and how it could work in practice. 

    Dame Deborah James was a tireless and inspirational campaigner who helped change the national conversation on bowel cancer – it’s fitting that this lab in her name will drive forward research that could help thousands more people survive the disease.

    Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said:

    Bowel cancer has brought heartbreak to too many families across the country. But working in partnership with the NHS, researchers, and business, we can harness AI to overhaul how we detect and treat this horrendous disease. This new method is less invasive and will help with earlier detection which means keeping more families together for longer.

    Our support for cancer research will unlock more innovation and make vital work like that of the BowelBabe Research Lab possible. All of this will help us build a better NHS as part of our Plan for Change.

    Fighting cancer on all fronts, from diagnosis, research, prevention and treatment, is a key commitment made by the government. Earlier this year, the government launched a call for evidence for the National Cancer Plan, designed to improve patient experience to fight cancer.    

    This forms part of the wider strategy to reduce lives lost to the biggest killers across the UK, with investment in AI and innovative technologies helping to speed up diagnosis and improve treatment.      

    As part of its Plan for Change, the government will transform the NHS and is already seeing results – with waiting lists falling by over 200,000 since July last year.    

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 23 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Flag Writer Recognized as 2025 Senior Sailor of the Year

    Source: United States Navy (Medical)

    Yeoman 1st Class Joseph Hunt, a native of Surveyor, West Virginia, was announced as the U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery’s Senior Sailor of the Year (SSOY), Fiscal Year 2025, at Defense Health Headquarters, April 14, 2025.

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: ECE sector review changes begin

    Source: New Zealand Government

    Regulation Minister David Seymour has today provided an update on the implementation of the Early Childhood Education (ECE) regulatory review.
    “This review and the changes announced today show the power of a sector review. The Ministry for Regulation went in and listened to the people who actually run, work at, and use early childhood regulation. They found people encircled by multiple regulators enforcing out of date rules, and proposed solutions now being put into action,” Mr Seymour says.
    “By the end of next year ECE providers will be governed by a regulatory system which ensures regulations are focused on what matters, child safety. 
     
    Cabinet has agreed to 15 changes which modernise and simplify regulations across ECE. Services will be able to get on with what they do best – providing safe, high-quality care and education as the changes are rolled out over the coming year.
    “Part of the change will involve amending laws in Parliament. The Education and Training (Early Childhood Education Reform) Amendment Bill will action many of these changes. The bill will be introduced in July, and I expect it to be passed by the end of the year,” Mr Seymour says.
    “The biggest complaint arises from the calcified, high stakes licencing criteria – 98 of them – that can each have a centre shut down with little to no notice. New licensing criteria will be gazetted by the end of September, following the recommendation to change or merge approximately three-quarters of the licensing criteria. Consultation will begin shortly to test the precise changes.
    “By mid next year, graduated enforcement tools will be used to respond to breaches of the remaining licensing criteria. The only enforcement tools previously available were the granting or removal of ECE licenses, which is too blunt a tool for managing minor breaches and enabling early intervention. There will no longer be high-stakes open-or-shut rules that create anxiety and strained relationships for regulators and centre operators alike.” 
    Graduated enforcement will give the regulator a range of enforcement measures. They will be able to respond proportionately to breaches, changing the sector’s culture from a punitive approach to promoting quality.  
    “The implementation of the recommendations represents a major shakeup of the sector’s outdated system. It is a great result for children, parents and ECE service providers,” Mr Seymour says.  
    “The changes will reduce unnecessary compliance costs, remove duplication, and streamline operational requirements. ECE providers will no longer be burdened with 98 separate licensing criteria, many of which were arbitrary or outdated, such as requirements to: 

    ⁠maintain a constant indoor temperature of 18 degrees, when common sense says a minor deviation from 18 degrees won’t hurt anyone, and
    ⁠hold immunisation records for every child over 15 months, which the Ministry of Health already does.

    “This will encourage more providers into a thriving market with reduced operation costs and compliance headaches. For parents this will mean more safe and affordable ECE options for their children.  
    “As part of its comprehensive review, the Ministry for Regulation analysed over 2,300 submissions and written feedback, met with parents and caregivers, providers and workers, visited 16 ECE services, and conducted a series of structured interviews and workshops with other agencies that engage with or regulate the sector. Thank you to the thousands of people who contributed their views.
    “This is just the beginning. The Ministry is now helping the agriculture and horticulture sector implement sector review findings, and progressing sector reviews into the hairdressing and barbering, and the telecommunications sector. They’re also working closely with the industrial hemp industry and others who’ve come forward through our red tape tipline.
    “In a high-cost economy, regulation isn’t neutral. It’s a tax on growth. Every completed review makes it easier to do business, access services, and innovate in New Zealand. The ECE review is the first of many examples of what smarter regulation looks like in action.”
    Link to report: https://www.regulation.govt.nz/about-us/our-publications/regulatory-review-of-early-childhood-education-full-report/
    Link to report summary: https://www.regulation.govt.nz/about-us/our-publications/regulatory-review-of-early-childhood-education-summary/

    MIL OSI New Zealand News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: WSGS and USGS collaborate on new airborne mineral survey in southeastern Wyoming

    Source: US Geological Survey

    Editor: In the public interest and in accordance with Federal Aviation Administration regulations, the USGS is announcing this low-level airborne project. Your assistance in informing the local communities is appreciated. 

    Focused on the Shirley Mountains and Hartville Uplift areas—regions known for mineralization but limited by existing geophysical data—the survey aims to improve understanding of subsurface geology and better target areas of critical mineral interest for future mapping and research.

    “Baseline, high-quality geophysical data have become essential for modern geologic investigations,” said Erin Campbell, WSGS Director and Wyoming State Geologist. “These surveys help identify hidden structures and features that could point to valuable resources and guide ongoing research across Wyoming’s mineral-rich terrains.”

    “WSGS is a key partner as USGS leads national efforts to map the critical minerals needed to drive the U.S. economy and national security, and expand our knowledge of the nation’s geologic framework. Wyoming produced $622 million in nonfuel mineral commodities in 2024, eighth-most in the nation. Expanding knowledge of the state’s subsurface geology could grow the state’s mining sector,” said Jamey Jones, science coordinator of the USGS Earth Mapping Resources Initiative.

    The survey will acquire both magnetic and radiometric data across two regions. The western block includes Pathfinder Reservoir, the Shirley and Freezout mountains, and the western part of Casper Mountain. The eastern block covers the Hartville Uplift, stretching from near Wheatland to north of Lusk.

    Mineral commodities of interest for the survey include cobalt, nickel, rare earth elements, platinum group elements, and graphite, all on the List of Critical Minerals maintained by the USGS as essential to the U.S. economy and national security, and vulnerable to supply chain disruption. Uranium and a wide range of other strategic materials are also present. The data may also help resolve open questions about regional tectonics and the evolution of major structural features through the Miocene.

    “More than 30 percent of the state’s biennium budget is derived from mineral severance tax and federal mineral royalties, according to the January 2025 Consensus Revenue Estimating Group’s forecast for Wyoming revenue,” said Campbell. “Wyoming has taken a proactive approach to ensure future investment from the mineral industry. With the completion of this and other ongoing geophysical surveys, more than 20 percent of Wyoming, or 19,300 square miles, will be covered by the highest-quality magnetic and radiometric data, which will galvanize mineral exploration.”

    Survey aircraft—both helicopters and fixed-wing planes—will collect data along closely spaced flight lines at a nominal elevation of about 300 feet (100 meters). The magnetic component of the survey detects variations in the Earth’s magnetic field that reveal subsurface structures up to a kilometer deep, or about 3,000 feet. Radiometric sensors measure natural radiation to help map the distribution of potassium, thorium, and uranium near the surface.

    The survey will use aircraft equipped with an elongated “stinger” mounted to either the tail extending backward off the aircraft (fixed wing), or landing skid (helicopter) extending forward off the aircraft. The scientific instruments on the aircraft are completely passive, with no emissions that pose a risk to humans, animals, or plant life. No photography or video data will be collected.  The data collected will be made freely available to the public once complete. The aircraft will be flown by experienced pilots who are specially trained and approved for low-level flying. The company contracted to fly the survey works with the FAA to ensure flights are safe and in accordance with U.S. law. The surveys will be conducted during daylight hours only.

    This new dataset will bridge existing geophysical surveys in the Laramie Mountains, South Pass–Granite Mountains, Sierra Madre, and Medicine Bow Mountains. It will also provide insight into complex geologic features along the Cheyenne Belt—a key boundary between the Archean Wyoming Province and younger Proterozoic rocks—long recognized for its mineral potential.

    “These regions host a variety of mineral systems, including mafic magmatic, polymetallic, and rare earth element deposits,” said Patty Webber, a geologist with the WSGS. “With the addition of high-resolution geophysics, we can begin to better understand the full scope of resource potential across this structurally complex corridor.”

    Following data acquisition, the WSGS and its partners will analyze and interpret the results in combination with field mapping, subsurface modeling, and other techniques to better assess mineral potential and geologic history.

    Earth MRI is a nationwide partnership between the USGS and state geological surveys aimed at mapping critical minerals, and modernizing geologic data with benefits for hazard reduction and water availability. The program has supported multiple airborne geophysical efforts in Wyoming in recent years.

    To learn more about Earth MRI efforts in Wyoming and across the U.S., visit the Earth MRI Acquisitions Viewer

    Figure 2:  Fixed wing survey aircraft to be flown at low altitudes over Area A.  Courtesy Precision GeoSurveys Inc.
    Figure 3:  Helicopter survey aircraft to be flown at low altitudes over Area B.  Courtesy Precision GeoSurveys Inc.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Timberland Bancorp Reports Second Fiscal Quarter Net Income of $6.76 Million

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    • Quarterly EPS Increases 21% to $0.85 from $0.70 One Year Ago
    • Quarterly Net Interest Margin Increases to 3.79%
    • Quarterly Return on Average Assets of 1.43%
    • Quarterly Return on Average Equity of 10.95%
    • Announces a 4% Increase in the Quarterly Cash Dividend

    HOQUIAM, Wash., April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Timberland Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSBK) (“Timberland” or “the Company”), the holding company for Timberland Bank (the “Bank”), today reported net income of $6.76 million, or $0.85 per diluted common share for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. This compares to net income of $6.86 million, or $0.86 per diluted common share for the preceding quarter and $5.71 million, or $0.70 per diluted common share, for the comparable quarter one year ago.

    For the first six months of fiscal 2025, Timberland’s net income increased 13% to $13.62 million, or $1.71 per diluted common share, from $12.00 million, or $1.47 per diluted common share for the first six months of fiscal 2024.

    “Our second fiscal quarter operating results were strong, highlighted by net interest margin expansion and modest balance sheet growth,” stated Dean Brydon, Chief Executive Officer. “Second fiscal quarter net income and earnings per share increased 18% and 21%, respectively, compared to the second fiscal quarter a year ago, reflecting an improvement in our net interest margin. Compared to the prior quarter, net income and earnings per share decreased 2% and 1%, respectively, as the increase in net interest income was offset by a higher provision for credit losses and a modest increase in expenses. All profitability metrics improved compared to the year ago quarter, and tangible book value per share (non-GAAP) continued to trend upward.”

    “As a result of Timberland’s solid earnings and strong capital position, our Board of Directors announced a 4% increase to the quarterly cash dividend to shareholders to $0.26 per share, payable on May 23, 2025, to shareholders of record on May 9, 2025,” stated Jonathan Fischer, President and Chief Operating Officer. “This represents the 50th consecutive quarter Timberland will have paid a cash dividend.”

    “During the second fiscal quarter our net interest margin continued to improve, expanding 15 basis points to 3.79%, compared to the preceding quarter,” said Marci Basich, Chief Financial Officer. “The improvement was primarily driven by a reduction in funding costs as the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities decreased by 15 basis points during the quarter. Total deposits increased $20 million, or 1% during the quarter, due to increases in checking and certificates of deposit account balances.”

    “The loan portfolio continues to grow at a moderate pace, increasing 1% from the prior quarter and 4% year-over year,” Brydon continued. “We continue to monitor credit quality closely and saw improvements in several metrics during the quarter. The non-performing asset ratio improved to just 13 basis points, non-accrual loans decreased by 15%, and net charge-offs were less than $1,000 during the quarter. However, we experienced an increase in loans graded “Substandard”, as two loans related to one borrowing relationship were downgraded. Both of the loans are performing and Timberland remains well collateralized based on recent appraisals, but the loans were downgraded primarily because the borrower is experiencing a legal issue stemming from an unrelated project. We view this as an isolated event, and remain encouraged by the overall strength of our loan portfolio.”

    Earnings and Balance Sheet Highlights (at or for the periods ended March 31, 2025, compared to March 31, 2024, or December 31, 2024):

    Earnings Highlights:

    • Earnings per diluted common share (“EPS”) decreased 1% to $0.85 for the current quarter from $0.86 for the preceding quarter and increased 21% from $0.70 for the comparable quarter one year ago; EPS increased 16% to $1.71 for the first six months of fiscal 2025 from $1.47 for the first six months of fiscal 2024;
    • Net income decreased 2% to $6.76 million for the current quarter from $6.86 million for the preceding quarter and increased 18% from $5.71 million for the comparable quarter one year ago; Net income increased 13% to $13.62 million for the first six months of fiscal 2025 from $12.00 million for the first six months of fiscal 2024;
    • Return on average equity (“ROE”) and return on average assets (“ROA”) for the current quarter were 10.95% and 1.43%, respectively;
    • Net interest margin (“NIM”) for the current quarter expanded to 3.79% from 3.64% for the preceding quarter and 3.48% for the comparable quarter one year ago; and
    • The efficiency ratio for the current quarter improved to 56.25% from 56.27% for the preceding quarter and 60.22% for the comparable quarter one year ago.

    Balance Sheet Highlights:

    • Total assets increased 1% from the prior quarter and increased 1% year-over-year;
    • Net loans receivable increased 1% from the prior quarter and increased 4% year-over-year;
    • Total deposits increased 1% from the prior quarter and increased 1% year-over-year;
    • Total shareholders’ equity increased 1% from the prior quarter and increased 6% year-over-year; 61,764 shares of common stock were repurchased during the current quarter for $1.91 million;
    • Non-performing assets to total assets ratio improved to 0.13% at March 31, 2025 compared to 0.16% at December 31, 2024 and 0.19% at March 31, 2024;
    • Book and tangible book (non-GAAP) values per common share increased to $31.95 and $29.99, respectively, at March 31, 2025; and
    • Liquidity (both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet) remained strong at March 31, 2025 with only $20 million in borrowings and additional secured borrowing line capacity of $675 million available through the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) and the Federal Reserve.

    Operating Results

    Operating revenue (net interest income before the provision for credit losses plus non-interest income) for the current quarter increased 1% to $19.90 million from $19.67 million for the preceding quarter and increased 9% from $18.25 million for the comparable quarter one year ago. The increase in operating revenue compared to the preceding quarter was primarily due to a decrease in funding costs, which was partially offset by a decrease in total interest and dividend income. Operating revenue increased 7%, to $39.57 million for the first six months of fiscal 2025 from $37.05 million for the first six months of fiscal 2024, primarily due to increases in interest income from loans and interest-bearing deposits in banks, which was partially offset by an increase in funding costs and a decrease in interest income on investment securities.

    Net interest income increased $243,000, or 1%, to $17.21 million for the current quarter from $16.97 million for the preceding quarter and increased $1.58 million, or 10%, from $15.64 million for the comparable quarter one year ago. The increase in net interest income compared to the preceding quarter was primarily due to a 15 basis point decrease in the weighted average cost of total interest-bearing liabilities to 2.47% from 2.62% and a six basis point increase in the weighted average yield on total interest-earning assets to 5.48% from 5.42%. These increases to net interest income were partially offset by an $11.44 million decrease in the average balance of total interest-earning assets.   Timberland’s NIM for the current quarter expanded to 3.79% from 3.64% for the preceding quarter and 3.48% for the comparable quarter one year ago.   The NIM for the current quarter was increased by approximately five basis points due to the collection of $201,000 in pre-payment penalties, non-accrual interest, and late fees and the accretion of $17,000 of the fair value discount on acquired loans.   The NIM for the preceding quarter was increased by approximately three basis points due to the collection of $115,000 in pre-payment penalties, non-accrual interest, and late fees, and the accretion of $8,000 of the fair value discount on acquired loans.   The NIM for the comparable quarter one year ago was increased by approximately three basis points due to the collection of $90,000 in pre-payment penalties, non-accrual interest, and late fees, and the accretion of $10,000 of the fair value discount on acquired loans. Net interest income for the first six months of fiscal 2025 increased $2.54 million, or 8%, to $34.18 million from $31.64 million for the first six months of fiscal 2024, primarily due to a $55.11 million increase in the average balance of total interest-earning assets and a 34 basis point increase in the weighted average yield of total interest-earning assets to 5.44% from 5.10%. These increases to net interest income were partially offset by an 18 basis point increase in the weighted average cost of interest-bearing liabilities to 2.55% from 2.37%. Timberland’s NIM expanded to 3.71% for the first six months of fiscal 2025 from 3.53% for the first six months of fiscal 2024.

    A $237,000 provision for credit losses on loans was recorded for the quarter ended March 31, 2025. The provision was primarily due to loan portfolio growth and changes in the composition of the loan portfolio. This compares to a $52,000 provision for credit losses on loans for the preceding quarter and a $166,000 provision for credit losses on loans for the comparable quarter one year ago. In addition, a $14,000 provision for credit losses on unfunded commitments and a $5,000 recapture of credit losses on investment securities were recorded for the current quarter.  

    Non-interest income decreased $10,000, (less than 1%) to $2.69 million for the current quarter from $2.70 million for the preceding quarter and increased $72,000, or 3%, from $2.62 million for the comparable quarter one year ago. The decrease in non-interest income compared to the preceding quarter was primarily due to a decrease in ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees and smaller changes in several other categories, which was partially offset by an increase in gain on sales of loans and smaller changes in several other categories. Fiscal year-to-date non-interest income decreased by 1%, to $5.38 million from $5.41 million for the first six months of fiscal 2024.

    Total operating (non-interest) expenses for the current quarter increased $127,000, or 1%, to $11.19 million from $11.07 million for the preceding quarter and increased $203,000, or 2%, from $10.99 million for the comparable quarter one year ago.   The increase in operating expenses compared to the preceding quarter was primarily due to increases in premises and equipment expenses, professional fees and smaller increases in several other expense categories. These increases were partially offset by decreases in salaries and employee benefits and smaller decreases in several other expense categories. The efficiency ratio for the current quarter was 56.25% compared to 56.27% for the preceding quarter and 60.22% for the comparable quarter one year ago. Fiscal year-to-date operating expenses increased 3% to $22.26 million from $21.62 million for the first six months of fiscal 2024.

    The provision for income taxes for the current quarter decreased $8,000, or less than 1%, to $1.71 million from $1.71 million for the preceding quarter, primarily due to lower taxable income. Timberland’s effective income tax rate was 20.2% for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, compared to 20.0% for the quarter ended December 31, 2024 and 20.5% for the quarter ended March 31, 2024. Timberland’s effective income tax rate was 20.1% for the first six months of fiscal 2025 and fiscal 2024.

    Balance Sheet Management

    Total assets increased $23.25 million, or 1%, during the quarter to $1.93 billion at March 31, 2025 from $1.91 billion at December 31, 2024 and increased $25.50 million, or 1%, from $1.91 billion one year ago.   The increase during the current quarter was primarily due to a $27.14 million increase in total cash and cash equivalents, an $8.26 million increase in net loans receivable and smaller increases in several other categories. These increases were partially offset by a $7.42 million decrease in investment securities and smaller decreases in several other categories.

    Liquidity

    Timberland has continued to maintain a strong liquidity position, both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet. Liquidity, as measured by the sum of cash and cash equivalents, CDs held for investment, and available for sale investment securities, was 16.9% of total liabilities at March 31, 2025, compared to 15.0% at December 31, 2024, and 15.2% one year ago. Timberland had secured borrowing line capacity of $675 million available through the FHLB and the Federal Reserve at March 31, 2025. With a strong and diversified deposit base, only 18% of Timberland’s deposits were uninsured or uncollateralized at March 31, 2025. (Note: This calculation excludes public deposits that are fully collateralized.)

    Loans

    Net loans receivable increased $8.26 million, or 1%, during the quarter to $1.42 billion at March 31, 2025 from $1.41 billion at December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily due to a $10.31 million decrease in the undisbursed portion of construction loans in process, an $8.98 million increase in one- to four-family loans and a $5.19 million increase in commercial real estate loans. These increases were partially offset by a $12.57 million decrease in construction loans and smaller decreases in several other loan categories.

    Loan Portfolio
    ($ in thousands)
     
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
      Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent   Amount   Percent
    Mortgage loans:                      
    One- to four-family (a) $ 315,421     21%   $ 306,443     20%   $ 276,433     19%
    Multi-family   178,590     12     177,861     12     167,275     12
    Commercial   602,248     40     597,054     39     577,373     40
    Construction – custom and                      
    owner/builder   114,401     7     124,104     8     122,988     8
    Construction – speculative one-to four-family   9,791     1     8,887     1     16,407     1
    Construction – commercial   22,352     1     22,841     2     32,318     2
    Construction – multi-family   46,602     3     48,940     3     36,795     3
    Construction – land                      
    development   15,032     1     15,977     1     16,051     1
    Land   32,301     2     30,538     2     31,821     2
    Total mortgage loans   1,336,738     88     1,332,645     88     1,277,461     88
                           
    Consumer loans:                      
    Home equity and second                      
    mortgage   47,458     3     48,851     3     42,357     3
    Other   2,375     —     2,889     —     2,925     —
    Total consumer loans   49,833     3     51,740     3     45,282     3
                           
    Commercial loans:                      
    Commercial business loans   131,243     9     135,312     9     135,505     9
    SBA PPP loans   156     —     204     —     367     —
    Total commercial loans   131,399     9     135,516     9     135,872     9
    Total loans   1,517,970     100%     1,519,901     100%     1,458,615     100%
    Less:                      
    Undisbursed portion of                      
    construction loans in                      
    process   (75,042 )         (85,350 )         (77,502 )    
    Deferred loan origination                      
    fees   (5,329 )         (5,444 )         (5,179 )    
    Allowance for credit losses   (17,525 )         (17,288 )         (16,818 )    
    Total loans receivable, net $ 1,420,074         $ 1,411,819         $ 1,359,116      
                                       

    _______________________
    (a)  Does not include one- to four-family loans held for sale totaling $1,151, $411, and $1,311 at March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2024, respectively.  

    The following table provides a breakdown of commercial real estate (“CRE”) mortgage loans by collateral type as of March 31, 2025:

    CRE Loan Portfolio Breakdown by Collateral
    ($ in thousands)
     
    Collateral Type   Balance   Percent of
    CRE
    Portfolio
      Percent of
    Total Loan
    Portfolio
      Average
    Balance Per
    Loan
      Non-
    Accrual
    Industrial warehouse   $ 127,898   21%   8%   $ 1,255   $ 163
    Medical/dental offices     84,013   14   5     1,254     —
    Office buildings     68,239   11   5     784     —
    Other retail buildings     53,121   9   3     553     —
    Mini-storage     32,596   5   2     1,358     —
    Hotel/motel     31,967   5   2     2,664     —
    Restaurants     27,374   5   2     582     161
    Gas stations/conv. stores     24,622   4   2     1,026     —
    Churches     14,823   3   1     988     —
    Nursing homes     13,606   2   1     2,268     —
    Shopping centers     10,578   2   1     1,762     —
    Mobile home parks     8,968   2   1     448     —
    Additional CRE     104,443   17   7     762     —
    Total CRE   $ 602,248   100%   40%   $ 938   $ 324
                               

    Timberland originated $56.76 million in loans during the quarter ended March 31, 2025, compared to $72.07 million for the preceding quarter and $39.37 million for the comparable quarter one year ago. Timberland continues to originate fixed-rate one- to four-family mortgage loans, a portion of which are sold into the secondary market for asset-liability management purposes and to generate non-interest income.   During the current quarter, fixed-rate one- to four-family mortgage loans totaling $5.17 million were sold compared to $2.31 million for the preceding quarter and $2.28 million for the comparable quarter one year ago.

    Investment Securities
            
    Timberland’s investment securities and CDs held for investment decreased $6.17 million, or 3%, to $235.33 million at March 31, 2025, from $241.50 million at December 31, 2024. The decrease was primarily due to maturities of U.S. Treasury investment securities (classified as held to maturity) and scheduled amortization. Partially offsetting these decreases, was the purchase of additional U.S. government agency mortgage-backed investment securities and U.S. Treasury investment securities, all of which were classified as available for sale.

    Deposits

    Total deposits increased $20.41 million, or 1%, during the quarter to $1.65 billion at March 31, 2025, from $1.63 billion at December 31, 2024. The quarter’s increase consisted of a $15.45 million increase in certificates of deposit account balances, a $9.91 million increase in NOW checking account balances, a $4.90 million increase in non-interest bearing account balances, and a $1.01 million increase in savings account balances. These decreases were partially offset by a $10.86 million decrease in money market account balances.

    Deposit Breakdown
    ($ in thousands)
     
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
      Amount    Percent   Amount    Percent   Amount   Percent
    Non-interest-bearing demand $ 407,811     25%   $ 402,911     25%   $ 424,906   26%
    NOW checking   333,325     20     323,412     20     336,621   20
    Savings   207,857     13     206,845     13     211,085   13
    Money market   300,552     18     311,413     19     311,994   19
    Certificates of deposit under $250   227,137     14     212,764     13     190,762   12
    Certificates of deposit $250 and over   124,009     7     122,997     7     118,698   7
    Certificates of deposit – brokered   50,139     3     50,074     3     44,488   3
    Total deposits $ 1,650,830     100%   $ 1,630,416     100%   $ 1,638,554   100%
                                     

    Borrowings

    Total borrowings were $20.00 million at both March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024. At March 31, 2025, the weighted average rate on the borrowings was 3.97%.

    Shareholders’ Equity and Capital Ratios

    Total shareholders’ equity increased $3.32 million, or 1%, to $252.52 million at March 31, 2025, from $249.20 million at December 31, 2024, and increased $13.84 million, or 6%, from $238.68 million at March 31, 2024.   The quarter’s increase in shareholders’ equity was primarily due to net income of $6.76 million, which was partially offset by the payment of $1.99 million in dividends to shareholders and the repurchase of 61,764 shares of common stock for $1.91 million (an average price of $30.85 per share). There were 65,995 shares available to be repurchased in accordance with the terms of its existing stock repurchase plan at March 31, 2025.

    Timberland remains well capitalized with a total risk-based capital ratio of 20.29%, a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 12.55%, a tangible common equity to tangible assets ratio (non-GAAP) of 12.36%, and a shareholders’ equity to total assets ratio of 13.07% at March 31, 2025.   Timberland’s held to maturity investment securities were $140.95 million at March 31, 2025, with a net unrealized loss of $6.62 million (pre-tax). Although not permitted by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), including these unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) would result in a ratio of shareholders’ equity to total assets of 12.83%, compared to 13.07%, as reported.

    Asset Quality

    Timberland’s non-performing assets to total assets ratio improved to 0.13% at March 31, 2025, compared to 0.16% at December 31, 2024 and 0.19% at March 31, 2024.   Net charge-offs totaled less than $1,000 for the current quarter compared to net charge-offs of $242,000 for the preceding quarter and net charge-offs of $3,000 for the comparable quarter one year ago. During the current quarter, provisions for credit losses of $237,000 on loans and $14,000 unfunded commitments were made, which was partially offset by a $5,000 recapture of credit losses on investment securities. The allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) for loans as a percentage of loans receivable was 1.22% at March 31, 2025, compared to 1.21% at December 31, 2024 and 1.22% one year ago.

    Total delinquent loans (past due 30 days or more) and non-accrual loans decreased $697,000 or 17%, to $3.32 million at March 31, 2025, from $4.02 million at December 31, 2024 and decreased $879,000, or 21%, from $4.20 million at March 31, 2024. Non-accrual loans decreased $406,000, or 15%, to $2.33 million at March 31, 2025 from $2.73 million at December 31, 2024 and decreased $1.28 million, or 35%, from $3.61 million at March 31, 2024.   The quarterly decrease in non-accrual loans was primarily due to decreases in commercial business loans and commercial real estate loans on non-accrual status. Loans graded “Substandard”, however, increased to $23.51 million at March 31, 2025 from $2.12 million at December 31, 2024 and $8.42 million at March 31, 2024. The increase in loans graded “Substandard” was primarily a result of two loans (totaling $21.30 million) to one borrowing relationship being downgraded during the March 31, 2025 quarter. Both of these loans are performing and Timberland remains well collateralized (based on recent appraisals), but the loans were downgraded primarily because the borrower is experiencing a legal issue stemming from an unrelated project.   

    Non-Accrual Loans
    ($ in thousands)
     
      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
      Amount   Quantity   Amount   Quantity   Amount   Quantity
    Mortgage loans:                      
    One- to four-family $ 47   1   $ 47   1   $ 380   3
    Commercial   324   3     698   5     1,149   3
    Construction – custom and                      
    owner/builder   —   —     —   —     152   1
    Total mortgage loans   371   4     745   6     1,681   7
                           
    Consumer loans:                      
    Home equity and second                      
    mortgage   575   3     587   3     165   1
    Other   —   —     —   —     —   —
    Total consumer loans   575   3     587   3     165   1
                           
    Commercial business loans   1,381   11     1,401   11     1,759   6
    Total loans $ 2,327   18   $ 2,733   20   $ 3,605   14
                                 

    Timberland had two properties classified as other real estate owned (“OREO”) at March 31, 2025:

      March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
      Amount   Quantity   Amount   Quantity   Amount   Quantity
    Other real estate owned:                      
    Commercial $ 221   1   $ 221   1   $ —   —
    Land   —   1     —   1     —   1
    Total mortgage loans $ 221   2   $ 221   2   $ —   1
                                 

    About Timberland Bancorp, Inc.
    Timberland Bancorp, Inc., a Washington corporation, is the holding company for Timberland Bank. The Bank opened for business in 1915 and primarily serves consumers and businesses across Grays Harbor, Thurston, Pierce, King, Kitsap and Lewis counties, Washington with a full range of lending and deposit services through its 23 branches (including its main office in Hoquiam).    

    Disclaimer

    Certain matters discussed in this press release may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, are based on certain assumptions and often include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about future economic performance. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results anticipated or implied by our forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to: potential adverse impacts to economic conditions in our local market areas, other markets where the Company has lending relationships, or other aspects of the Company’s business operations or financial markets, including, without limitation, as a result of employment levels, labor shortages and the effects of inflation, a potential recession or slowed economic growth; continuing elevated levels of inflation and the impact of current and future monetary policies of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”) in response thereto; the effects of any federal government shutdown; credit risks of lending activities, including any deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets which may lead to increased losses and non-performing loans in our loan portfolio resulting in our ACL not being adequate to cover actual losses and thus requiring us to materially increase our ACL through the provision for credit losses; changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas; changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short and long-term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources; fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes, land and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas; secondary market conditions for loans and our ability to sell loans in the secondary market; results of examinations of us by the Federal Reserve and of our bank subsidiary by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Division of Banks or other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such regulatory authority may, among other things, institute a formal or informal enforcement action against us or our bank subsidiary which could require us to increase our ACL, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position or affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits or impose additional requirements or restrictions on us, any of which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; the impact of bank failures or adverse developments at other banks and related negative press about the banking industry in general on investor and depositor sentiment; legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business including changes in banking, securities and tax law, in regulatory policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules; our ability to attract and retain deposits; our ability to control operating costs and expenses; the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation; difficulties in reducing risks associated with the loans in our consolidated balance sheet; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our work force and potential associated charges; disruptions, security breaches, or other adverse events, failures or interruptions in, or attacks on, our information technology systems or on the third-party vendors who perform several of our critical processing functions; our ability to retain key members of our senior management team; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; our ability to implement our business strategies; our ability to manage loan delinquency rates; increased competitive pressures among financial services companies; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions; our ability to pay dividends on our common stock; the quality and composition of our securities portfolio and the impact if any adverse changes in the securities markets, including on market liquidity; inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; the economic impact of climate change, severe weather events, natural disasters, pandemics, epidemics and other public health crises, acts of war or terrorism, civil unrest and other external events on our business; other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services; and other risks described elsewhere in this press release and in the Company’s other reports filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this press release and in the other public statements we make are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made. We do not undertake and specifically disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements included in this press release to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements discussed in this document might not occur and we caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. These risks could cause our actual results for fiscal 2025 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements by, or on behalf of, us, and could negatively affect the Company’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations as well as its stock price performance.

    TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    Three Months Ended
    ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited) March 31,   Dec. 31   March 31,
      2025   2024   2024
      Interest and dividend income          
      Loans receivable $ 20,896     $ 21,032     $ 18,909  
      Investment securities   2,003       2,138       2,246  
      Dividends from mutual funds, FHLB stock and other investments   82       86       82  
      Interest bearing deposits in banks   1,884       2,001       1,919  
      Total interest and dividend income   24,865       25,257       23,156  
                 
      Interest expense          
      Deposits   7,454       8,084       7,301  
      Borrowings   198       203       220  
      Total interest expense   7,652       8,287       7,521  
      Net interest income   17,213       16,970       15,635  
      Provision for credit losses – loans   237       52       166  
      Prov. for (recapture of) credit losses – investment securities   (5 )     (5 )     3  
      Prov. for (recapture of ) credit losses – unfunded commitments   14       (20 )     (88 )
      Net int. income after provision for (recapture of) credit losses   16,967       16,943       15,554  
                 
      Non-interest income          
      Service charges on deposits   959       999       988  
      ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees   1,176       1,267       1,212  
      Gain on sales of loans, net   122       43       41  
      Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) net earnings   165       167       156  
      Recoveries on investment securities, net   4       3       2  
      Other   261       218       216  
      Total non-interest income, net   2,687       2,697       2,615  
                 
      Non-interest expense          
      Salaries and employee benefits   5,977       6,092       6,024  
      Premises and equipment   1,075       950       1,081  
      Advertising   189       181       159  
      OREO and other repossessed assets, net   9       —       —  
      ATM and debit card processing   521       521       601  
      Postage and courier   142       121       145  
      State and local taxes   335       346       325  
      Professional fees   431       346       319  
      FDIC insurance   219       210       206  
      Loan administration and foreclosure   155       128       134  
      Technology and communications   1,121       1,140       1,040  
      Deposit operations   319       332       324  
      Amortization of core deposit intangible (“CDI”)   45       45       57  
      Other, net   656       655       576  
      Total non-interest expense, net   11,194       11,067       10,991  
                 
      Income before income taxes   8,460       8,573       7,178  
      Provision for income taxes   1,705       1,713       1,470  
      Net income $ 6,755     $ 6,860     $ 5,708  
                 
      Net income per common share:          
      Basic $ 0.85     $ 0.86     $ 0.71  
      Diluted   0.85       0.86       0.70  
                 
      Weighted average common shares outstanding:          
      Basic   7,937,063       7,958,275       8,081,924  
      Diluted   7,968,632       7,999,504       8,121,109  
                 
    TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    Six Months Ended
    ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited) March 31,       March 31,
      2025       2024
      Interest and dividend income          
      Loans receivable $ 41,928         $ 37,304  
      Investment securities   4,141           4,556  
      Dividends from mutual funds, FHLB stock and other investments   168           173  
      Interest bearing deposits in banks   3,885           3,618  
      Total interest and dividend income   50,122           45,651  
                 
      Interest expense          
      Deposits   15,538           13,444  
      Borrowings   402           568  
      Total interest expense   15,940           14,012  
      Net interest income   34,182           31,639  
      Provision for credit losses – loans   289           545  
      Recapture of credit losses – investment securities   (10 )         (7 )
      Recapture of credit losses – unfunded commitments   (7 )         (121 )
      Net int. income after provision for (recapture of) credit losses   33,910           31,222  
                 
      Non-interest income          
      Service charges on deposits   1,958           2,011  
      ATM and debit card interchange transaction fees   2,443           2,476  
      Gain on sales of loans, net   165           120  
      Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) net earnings   331           312  
      Recoveries on investment securities, net   7           7  
      Other   480           487  
      Total non-interest income, net   5,384           5,413  
                 
      Non-interest expense          
      Salaries and employee benefits   12,068           11,936  
      Premises and equipment   2,025           2,054  
      Advertising   370           345  
      OREO and other repossessed assets, net   9           —  
      ATM and debit card processing   1,043           1,216  
      Postage and courier   264           271  
      State and local taxes   680           644  
      Professional fees   777           572  
      FDIC insurance   429           416  
      Loan administration and foreclosure   283           239  
      Technology and communications   2,261           2,014  
      Deposit operations   652           644  
      Amortization of core deposit intangible (“CDI”)   90           113  
      Other, net   1,309           1,151  
      Total non-interest expense, net   22,260           21,615  
                 
      Income before income taxes   17,034           15,020  
      Provision for income taxes   3,419           3,016  
      Net income $ 13,615         $ 12,004  
                 
      Net income per common share:          
      Basic $ 1.71         $ 1.48  
      Diluted   1.71           1.47  
                 
      Weighted average common shares outstanding:          
      Basic   7,947,786           8,098,155  
      Diluted   7,984,238           8,143,701  
       
    TIMBERLAND BANCORP INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
     
    ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) (unaudited) March 31,   Dec. 31,   March 31,
      2025   2024   2024
    Assets          
    Cash and due from financial institutions $ 26,010     $ 24,538     $ 22,310  
    Interest-bearing deposits in banks   165,201       139,533       158,039  
      Total cash and cash equivalents   191,211       164,071       180,349  
                 
    Certificates of deposit (“CDs”) held for investment, at cost   8,711       7,470       11,204  
    Investment securities:          
      Held to maturity, at amortized cost (net of ACL – investment securities)   140,954       156,105       211,818  
      Available for sale, at fair value   84,807       77,080       61,746  
    Investments in equity securities, at fair value   853       840       839  
    FHLB stock   2,045       2,037       2,037  
    Other investments, at cost   3,000       3,000       3,000  
    Loans held for sale   1,151       411       1,311  
                   
    Loans receivable   1,437,599       1,429,107       1,375,934  
    Less: ACL – loans   (17,525 )     (17,288 )     (16,818 )
      Net loans receivable   1,420,074       1,411,819       1,359,116  
                 
    Premises and equipment, net   21,436       21,617       21,718  
    OREO and other repossessed assets, net   221       221       —  
    BOLI   23,942       23,777       23,278  
    Accrued interest receivable   7,127       7,095       7,108  
    Goodwill   15,131       15,131       15,131  
    CDI   361       406       564  
    Loan servicing rights, net   1,051       1,195       1,717  
    Operating lease right-of-use assets   1,324       1,400       1,624  
    Other assets   9,331       15,805       4,674  
      Total assets $ 1,932,730       1,909,480     $ 1,907,234  
                 
    Liabilities and shareholders’ equity          
    Deposits: Non-interest-bearing demand $ 407,811       402,911     $ 424,906  
    Deposits: Interest-bearing   1,243,019       1,227,505       1,213,648  
      Total deposits   1,650,830       1,630,416       1,638,554  
                 
    Operating lease liabilities   1,426       1,501       1,723  
    FHLB borrowings   20,000       20,000       20,000  
    Other liabilities and accrued expenses   7,950       8,364       8,278  
      Total liabilities   1,680,206       1,660,281       1,668,555  
               
    Shareholders’ equity          
    Common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized;                      
    7,903,489 shares issued and outstanding – March 31, 2025                      
    7,954,673 shares issued and outstanding – December 31, 2024                      
    8,023,121shares issued and outstanding – March 31, 2024   28,028       29,593       32,338  
    Retained earnings   225,166       220,398       207,086  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss   (670 )     (792 )     (745 )
      Total shareholders’ equity   252,524       249,199       238,679  
      Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 1,932,730       1,909,480     $ 1,907,234  
                             
      Three Months Ended
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS: March 31, 2025   Dec. 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    Return on average assets (a)   1.43 %     1.41 %     1.22 %
    Return on average equity (a)   10.95 %     11.03 %     9.67 %
    Net interest margin (a)   3.79 %     3.64 %     3.48 %
    Efficiency ratio   56.25 %     56.27 %     60.22 %
               
      Six Months Ended
      March 31, 2025       March 31, 2024
    Return on average assets (a)   1.42 %         1.28 %
    Return on average equity (a)   10.99 %         10.18 %
    Net interest margin (a)   3.71 %         3.53 %
    Efficiency ratio   56.26 %         58.34 %
               
      Three Months Ended
    ASSET QUALITY RATIOS AND DATA: ($ in thousands) March 31, 2025   Dec. 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
    Non-accrual loans $ 2,327     $ 2,733     $ 3,605  
    Loans past due 90 days and still accruing   —       —       —  
    Non-performing investment securities   41       45       79  
    OREO and other repossessed assets   221       221       —  
    Total non-performing assets (b) $ 2,589     $ 2,999     $ 3,684  
               
    Non-performing assets to total assets (b)   0.13 %     0.16 %     0.19 %
    Net charge-offs during quarter $ —     $ 242     $ 3  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans to non-accrual loans   753 %     633 %     467 %
    Allowance for credit losses – loans to loans receivable (c)   1.22 %     1.21 %     1.22 %
               
               
    CAPITAL RATIOS:          
    Tier 1 leverage capital   12.55 %     12.32 %     12.01 %
    Tier 1 risk-based capital   19.04 %     18.69 %     18.08 %
    Common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital   19.04 %     18.69 %     18.08 %
    Total risk-based capital   20.29 %     19.95 %     19.33 %
    Tangible common equity to tangible assets (non-GAAP)   12.36 %     12.34 %     11.79 %
               
    BOOK VALUES:          
    Book value per common share $ 31.95     $ 31.33     $ 29.75  
    Tangible book value per common share (d)   29.99       29.37       27.79  

    ________________________________________________

    (a) Annualized
    (b) Non-performing assets include non-accrual loans, loans past due 90 days and still accruing, non-performing investment securities and OREO and other repossessed assets.
    (c) Does not include loans held for sale and is before the allowance for credit losses.
    (d) Tangible common equity divided by common shares outstanding (non-GAAP).                                

    AVERAGE BALANCES, YIELDS, AND RATES – QUARTERLY
    ($ in thousands)
    (unaudited)

      For the Three Months Ended 
      March 31, 2025    December 31, 2024    March 31, 2024 
      Amount   Rate   Amount   Rate   Amount   Rate
                           
    Assets                      
    Loans receivable and loans held for sale $ 1,435,999     5.90 %   $ 1,438,144     5.80 %   $ 1,365,417     5.57 %
    Investment securities and FHLB stock (1)   232,532     3.64       247,236     3.57             298,003     3.14  
                                             
    Interest-earning deposits in banks and CDs   172,175     4.44       166,764     4.76       143,121     5.39  
    Total interest-earning assets   1,840,706     5.48       1,852,144     5.42            1,806,541     5.16  
    Other assets   77,563           75,534           81,337      
    Total assets $ 1,918,269         $ 1,927,678         $ 1,887,878      
                           
    Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity                      
    NOW checking accounts $ 328,115     1.32 %   $ 328,455     1.38 %   $ 367,924     1.61 %
    Money market accounts   306,137     3.18       324,424     3.42       270,623     3.14  
    Savings accounts   206,054     0.28       205,650     0.28       214,233     0.23  
    Certificates of deposit accounts   343,945     3.82       331,785     4.09       295,202     4.16  
    Brokered CDs   50,104     4.85       46,414     4.98       40,402     5.40  
    Total interest-bearing deposits   1,234,355     2.45       1,236,728     2.59       1,188,384     2.47  
    Borrowings   20,000     4.04       20,000     4.03       20,001     4.42  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   1,254,355     2.47       1,256,728     2.62       1,208,385     2.50  
                           
    Non-interest-bearing demand deposits   403,738           414,149           431,826      
    Other liabilities   10,064           10,146           10,182      
    Shareholders’ equity   250,112           246,655           237,485      
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 1,918,269         $ 1,927,678         $ 1,887,878      
                           
    Interest rate spread     3.01 %       2.80 %       2.66 %
    Net interest margin (2)     3.79 %       3.64 %       3.48 %
    Average interest-earning assets to                      
    average interest-bearing liabilities   146.75 %         147.38 %         149.50 %    
                                       

    _____________________________________
    (1) Includes other investments
    (2) Net interest margin = annualized net interest income / average interest-earning assets
            

    AVERAGE BALANCES, YIELDS, AND RATES
    ($ in thousands)
    (unaudited)

      For the Six Months Ended
      March 31, 2025   March 31, 2024
      Amount   Rate   Amount   Rate
                   
    Assets              
    Loans receivable and loans held for sale $ 1,437,081     5.85 %   $ 1,349,105     5.53 %
    Investment securities and FHLB stock (1)   239,966     3.60             307,636     3.08  
    Interest-earning deposits in banks and CDs   169,444     4.60       134,643     5.37  
    Total interest-earning assets        1,846,491     5.44            1,791,384     5.10  
    Other assets   76,535           81,473      
    Total assets $ 1,923,026         $ 1,872,857      
                   
    Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity              
    NOW checking accounts $ 328,287     1.35 %   $ 372,327     1.56 %
    Money market accounts   315,381     3.31       247,656     2.78  
    Savings accounts   205,849     0.28       217,153     0.23  
    Certificates of deposit accounts   337,798     3.95       281,842     4.07  
    Brokered CDs   48,239     4.91       41,570     5.39  
    Total interest-bearing deposits   1,235,554     2.52       1,160,548     2.32  
    Borrowings   20,000     4.02       24,427     4.65  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities   1,255,554     2.55       1,184,975     2.37  
                   
    Non-interest-bearing demand deposits   409,000           440,976      
    Other liabilities   10,107           11,035      
    Shareholders’ equity   248,365           235,871      
    Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 1,923,026         $ 1,872,857      
                   
    Interest rate spread     2.89 %       2.73 %
    Net interest margin (2)     3.71 %       3.53 %
    Average interest-earning assets to              
    average interest-bearing liabilities   147.07 %         151.17 %    

    _____________________________________
    (1) Includes other investments
    (2) Net interest margin = annualized net interest income / average interest-earning assets

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    In addition to results presented in accordance with GAAP, this press release contains certain non-GAAP financial measures. Timberland believes that certain non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with information useful in understanding the Company’s financial performance; however, readers of this report are urged to review these non-GAAP financial measures in conjunction with GAAP results as reported.

    Financial measures that exclude intangible assets are non-GAAP measures. To provide investors with a broader understanding of capital adequacy, Timberland provides non-GAAP financial measures for tangible common equity, along with the GAAP measure. Tangible common equity is calculated as shareholders’ equity less goodwill and CDI. In addition, tangible assets equal total assets less goodwill and CDI.

    The following table provides a reconciliation of ending shareholders’ equity (GAAP) to ending tangible shareholders’ equity (non-GAAP) and ending total assets (GAAP) to ending tangible assets (non-GAAP).

    ($ in thousands) March 31, 2025   December 31, 2024   March 31, 2024
               
    Shareholders’ equity $ 252,524     $ 249,199     $ 238,679  
    Less goodwill and CDI   (15,492 )     (15,537 )     (15,695 )
    Tangible common equity $ 237,032     $ 233,662     $ 222,984  
               
    Total assets $ 1,932,730     $ 1,909,480     $ 1,907,234  
    Less goodwill and CDI   (15,492 )     (15,537 )     (15,695 )
    Tangible assets $ 1,917,238     $ 1,893,943     $ 1,891,539  
                           
    Contact: Dean J. Brydon, CEO
      Jonathan A. Fischer, President & COO
      Marci A. Basich, CFO
      (360) 533-4747
      www.timberlandbank.com

    The MIL Network –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Attorney General Pamela Bondi Hosts First Task Force Meeting to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias in the Federal Government

    Source: US State of California

    Today, Attorney General Pamela Bondi hosted members of the President’s Cabinet at the U.S. Department of Justice for the inaugural meeting of the Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias in the federal government. The Task Force, which was established by President Trump under Executive Order 14202, was joined by peaceful Christian Americans who were unfairly targeted by the Biden Administration for their religious beliefs.

    The witnesses included:

    Michael Farris: First Amendment Litigator and Founding President of Patrick Henry College

    • Farris spoke on behalf of Senior Pastor Gary Hamrick to discuss how Cornerstone Church was under investigation and charged by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for so-called Johnson Amendment violations. Farris is an elder at the church, previously led Alliance Defending Freedom, and served as counsel on this case.

    Dr. Scott Hicks: Provost and Chief Academic Officer, Liberty University

    • Hicks described how Liberty University and Grand Canyon University were singled out by the Biden Administration for fines due to the schools’ Christian worldview.

    Phil Mendes: Navy Seal

    • Mendes was relieved of duty during Biden Administration for not taking the COVID-19 vaccine due to religious exemption requests that were denied by the Department of Defense.

    “As shown by our victims’ stories today, Biden’s Department of Justice abused and targeted peaceful Christians while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “Thanks to President Trump, we have ended those abuses, and we will continue to work closely with every member of this Task Force to protect every American’s right to speak and worship freely.”

    Attorney General Pamela Bondi with members of the Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias Task Force at the U.S. Department of Justice

    Additionally, members of the Task Force highlighted specific cases within their own agencies where the Biden Administration unfairly and harshly punished Christian Americans for their religious beliefs.  

    FBI Director Kash Patel discussed the impact of the anti-Catholic memo issued by FBI Richmond and reiterated the FBI’s commitment to rooting out any anti-Christian bias that could be directing decisions or investigations.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised several concerning allegations of bias, including some against Christian Foreign Service Officers who preferred to homeschool their children. In one case, a family was threatened with an investigation for child abuse and curtailment if they insisted on homeschooling. In another case, a family was referred to the IRS, threatened with prosecution, and investigated by Biden’s Inspector General for insisting they homeschool their son.

    He shared how State Department employees were stigmatized for opposing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on religious grounds, including being called “murderers” and “troublemakers.” In one instance, an ambassador yelled at an employee, accusing the employee of wanting to kill the ambassador’s mother despite her being back in the States.

    Other reports alleged retaliation against employees for opposing DEI/LGBT ideology that violated their religious conscience. Employees recounted being required to push LGBT agendas while serving overseas, even in countries where such activity constituted a blatant violation of the acceptable religious beliefs and practices. He also detailed allegations that that religious freedom policy offices and programs were sidelined unless they were promoting DEI-related programs.

    He also highlighted how Christian holidays at American embassies under the Biden Administration were frequently stripped of any religious overtones, but non-Christian religious holidays like Losar, Eid, or Ramadan, used proper names and appropriate celebratory greetings.

    Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discussed how the previous administration ordered St. Francis Health System in Oklahoma to extinguish its sanctuary candle or lose its ability to treat patients covered by Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program. He also discussed progressive rules put in place under the Biden Administration that would make it harder for Christians to become foster parents.

    Secretary of Education Linda McMahon discussed how Oregon educators Katie Medart and Rachel Sager were suspended and terminated for starting the movement, “I Resolve.” The movement spoke about gender identity education policy and offered solutions for how educators could teach without violating their conscience and also respect the rights of parents.

    Additionally, officials at the Skaneateles Central School District in New York began treating a middle-school girl as a boy without her mother’s knowledge or consent – violating their religious liberties as parents.

    Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender discussed financial surveillance under the Biden Administration, including the previous removal of certain tax classifications of Christian and pro-life organizations by the IRS, the lack of involvement within Treasury to protect organizations from the issue of debanking, and FinCEN’s identification of certain pro-Christian groups as “hate groups.”

    Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins discussed actions the VA took to stop the speech code that the previous administration used to punish Chaplain Trubey of the Coatesville VA Medical Center for fulfilling his duties and preaching a sermon from the Bible.

    Director of the Domestic Policy Council, Vince Haley, discussed how the previous DPC Director Neera Tanden helped lead and coordinate the Biden Administration’s efforts to push radical and anti-Christian gender ideology on kids in classrooms, foster care, sports, and healthcare.

    Additional attendees included:

    • Todd Blanche, Deputy Attorney General
    • Emil Bove, Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General
    • Stanley Woodward, Nominee to be Associate Attorney General
    • Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General
    • Pete Hegseth, U.S. Secretary of Defense
    • Kristi Noem, U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security
    • Andrew Hughes, Chief of Staff (Dep. Sec. Nom.) at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
    • Lori Chavez DeRemer, U.S. Secretary of Labor
    • Andrea Lucas, Acting Chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
    • Cameron Hamilton, Acting Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency
    • Dan Bishop, Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget
    • Kelly Loeffler, Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration
    • Pastor Paula White-Cain, Senior Advisor, White House Faith Office
    • Jennifer Korn, Faith Director, White House Faith Office

    Read the Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias Executive Order HERE.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Attorney General Pamela Bondi Hosts First Task Force Meeting to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias in the Federal Government

    Source: United States Attorneys General 13

    Today, Attorney General Pamela Bondi hosted members of the President’s Cabinet at the U.S. Department of Justice for the inaugural meeting of the Task Force to Eradicate Anti-Christian Bias in the federal government. The Task Force, which was established by President Trump under Executive Order 14202, was joined by peaceful Christian Americans who were unfairly targeted by the Biden Administration for their religious beliefs.

    The witnesses included:

    Michael Farris: First Amendment Litigator and Founding President of Patrick Henry College

    • Farris spoke on behalf of Senior Pastor Gary Hamrick to discuss how Cornerstone Church was under investigation and charged by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for so-called Johnson Amendment violations. Farris is an elder at the church, previously led Alliance Defending Freedom, and served as counsel on this case.

    Dr. Scott Hicks: Provost and Chief Academic Officer, Liberty University

    • Hicks described how Liberty University and Grand Canyon University were singled out by the Biden Administration for fines due to the schools’ Christian worldview.

    Phil Mendes: Navy Seal

    • Mendes was relieved of duty during Biden Administration for not taking the COVID-19 vaccine due to religious exemption requests that were denied by the Department of Defense.

    “As shown by our victims’ stories today, Biden’s Department of Justice abused and targeted peaceful Christians while ignoring violent, anti-Christian offenses,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “Thanks to President Trump, we have ended those abuses, and we will continue to work closely with every member of this Task Force to protect every American’s right to speak and worship freely.”

    Attorney General Pamela Bondi with members of the Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias Task Force at the U.S. Department of Justice

    Additionally, members of the Task Force highlighted specific cases within their own agencies where the Biden Administration unfairly and harshly punished Christian Americans for their religious beliefs.  

    FBI Director Kash Patel discussed the impact of the anti-Catholic memo issued by FBI Richmond and reiterated the FBI’s commitment to rooting out any anti-Christian bias that could be directing decisions or investigations.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised several concerning allegations of bias, including some against Christian Foreign Service Officers who preferred to homeschool their children. In one case, a family was threatened with an investigation for child abuse and curtailment if they insisted on homeschooling. In another case, a family was referred to the IRS, threatened with prosecution, and investigated by Biden’s Inspector General for insisting they homeschool their son.

    He shared how State Department employees were stigmatized for opposing the COVID-19 vaccine mandate on religious grounds, including being called “murderers” and “troublemakers.” In one instance, an ambassador yelled at an employee, accusing the employee of wanting to kill the ambassador’s mother despite her being back in the States.

    Other reports alleged retaliation against employees for opposing DEI/LGBT ideology that violated their religious conscience. Employees recounted being required to push LGBT agendas while serving overseas, even in countries where such activity constituted a blatant violation of the acceptable religious beliefs and practices. He also detailed allegations that that religious freedom policy offices and programs were sidelined unless they were promoting DEI-related programs.

    He also highlighted how Christian holidays at American embassies under the Biden Administration were frequently stripped of any religious overtones, but non-Christian religious holidays like Losar, Eid, or Ramadan, used proper names and appropriate celebratory greetings.

    Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discussed how the previous administration ordered St. Francis Health System in Oklahoma to extinguish its sanctuary candle or lose its ability to treat patients covered by Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program. He also discussed progressive rules put in place under the Biden Administration that would make it harder for Christians to become foster parents.

    Secretary of Education Linda McMahon discussed how Oregon educators Katie Medart and Rachel Sager were suspended and terminated for starting the movement, “I Resolve.” The movement spoke about gender identity education policy and offered solutions for how educators could teach without violating their conscience and also respect the rights of parents.

    Additionally, officials at the Skaneateles Central School District in New York began treating a middle-school girl as a boy without her mother’s knowledge or consent – violating their religious liberties as parents.

    Deputy Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender discussed financial surveillance under the Biden Administration, including the previous removal of certain tax classifications of Christian and pro-life organizations by the IRS, the lack of involvement within Treasury to protect organizations from the issue of debanking, and FinCEN’s identification of certain pro-Christian groups as “hate groups.”

    Secretary of Veterans Affairs Doug Collins discussed actions the VA took to stop the speech code that the previous administration used to punish Chaplain Trubey of the Coatesville VA Medical Center for fulfilling his duties and preaching a sermon from the Bible.

    Director of the Domestic Policy Council, Vince Haley, discussed how the previous DPC Director Neera Tanden helped lead and coordinate the Biden Administration’s efforts to push radical and anti-Christian gender ideology on kids in classrooms, foster care, sports, and healthcare.

    Additional attendees included:

    • Todd Blanche, Deputy Attorney General
    • Emil Bove, Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General
    • Stanley Woodward, Nominee to be Associate Attorney General
    • Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant Attorney General
    • Pete Hegseth, U.S. Secretary of Defense
    • Kristi Noem, U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security
    • Andrew Hughes, Chief of Staff (Dep. Sec. Nom.) at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
    • Lori Chavez DeRemer, U.S. Secretary of Labor
    • Andrea Lucas, Acting Chair of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
    • Cameron Hamilton, Acting Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency
    • Dan Bishop, Deputy Director of the Office of Management and Budget
    • Kelly Loeffler, Administrator of the U.S. Small Business Administration
    • Pastor Paula White-Cain, Senior Advisor, White House Faith Office
    • Jennifer Korn, Faith Director, White House Faith Office

    Read the Eradicating Anti-Christian Bias Executive Order HERE.

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Canada: New centre reduces barriers to mental-health, substance-use care

    Source: Government of Canada regional news

    More people now have access to timely, streamlined care for urgent mental-health and substance-use concerns at the new Urgent Care Response Centre North at Royal Columbian Hospital in New Westminster.

    “This centre is another step forward in our commitment to reducing barriers to mental-health and substance-use care,” said Josie Osborne, Minister of Health. “By providing people with timely access to assessment and care, all in one location, people experiencing mental-health and substance-use challenges will be able to get connected to the supports they need to put them on a path to healing faster.”

    The centre is located in the Mental Health and Substance Use Wellness Centre at Royal Columbian Hospital and is a primary point of contact for people who need urgent care but do not require hospitalization. Assessments can be done in person or virtually, providing flexibility and increased accessibility. Patients will be provided with crisis support and connections to community-based services and substance-use treatment.

    “Our urgent care response centre team is helping people facing mental-health or substance-use challenges feel supported,” said Rana Yonadim, manager, clinical operations and program services, Urgent Care Response Centre North. “We’re making it easier for individuals in our community by being here to connect them with the timely, appropriate care they need.”

    This is the second centre of its kind in the Fraser Health region. The first, at Surrey Memorial Hospital, was opened in 2019. In the first nine months after opening, 1,550 emergency room visits and 329 hospital admissions were redirected to the Surrey centre, helping more people access the right care.

    In 2024, the centre in Surrey made 7,397 referrals to appropriate in-hospital and community-based services, such as psychiatric consultations, counselling, crisis stabilization and substance-use services, to support people’s ongoing health needs.

    The centre’s welcoming environment provides rapid access to care, often through same-day appointments, with a dedicated team of psychiatrists, counsellors, nurses and other care professionals, as well as additional services that support people’s health and well-being.

    People can access the centre through self-referral by calling 604 520-4253 or by walking in directly, seven days a week from 8:30 a.m. until 8:30 p.m., including statutory holidays. Community doctors, police and other first responders can also refer clients. After an initial assessment, staff engage with clients to identify their needs and create a personalized care plan.

    The Urgent Care Response Centre North’s location in the Mental Health and Substance Use Wellness Centre places it near substance-use services on the hospital campus, such as the Rapid Access to Addiction Care Clinic, opioid agonist treatment, Adult Day, Evening and Weekend Treatment Program, and the emergency department.

    Quotes:

    Jennifer Whiteside, MLA for New Westminster-Coquitlam –

    “The centre immediately addresses the critical need for barrier-free mental-health and substance-use support for people in North Fraser communities. This will increase the availability of treatment options to support people seeking immediate medical care and promote healthier communities for everyone.” 

    Amna Shah, parliamentary secretary for mental health and addictions –

    “We’re keeping our promise to strengthen mental-health and substance-use services throughout B.C. so people can access the care they need, when they need it. The new Urgent Care Response Centre North connects people in New Westminster and surrounding areas with medical professionals as well as vital community-based services.”

    Dr. Anson Koo, program director and regional department head for psychiatry and mental health, Fraser Health –

    “The centre connects individuals facing urgent mental-health and substance-use challenges to integrated, timely and compassionate care within the hospital and in the community. It builds on the success of the first mental health and substance use urgent care response centre at Surrey Memorial Hospital, which opened in 2019, and uses this model of care to help more people on their path to healing and recovery.”

    Learn More:

    For more information about mental-health and substance-use supports in B.C., visit: https://helpstartshere.gov.bc.ca/

    To learn how B.C. is building better mental-health and addictions care, visit: https://gov.bc.ca/BetterCare

    MIL OSI Canada News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Dingell Holds Roundtable to Address Rising Cost of Child Care with Parents, Providers

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (12th District of Michigan)

    Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (MI-06) toured Tutor Time in Canton, and held a roundtable with child care providers and parents to discuss the impact of the rising cost of care on Michigan families.

    “Caregiving is the foundation of our economy – it allows for all other work to be possible. No one can do their job if their children aren’t cared for. But quality, affordable child care remains an expense that many American families cannot afford,” Dingell said. “It’s time to make investing in our country’s care infrastructure and workforce a priority to bring down costs and expand access to care. Today, we spoke to both parents and providers about the challenges they face finding and providing care, and what Congress can do to solve these problems.”

    “We were honored to host U.S. Representative Debbie Dingell at our Tutor Time location in Canton, MI, to discuss our commitment to helping families access quality and affordable childcare,” said Joanna Cline, Learning Care Group Executive and Michigan District 6 Constituent. “Partnering with Government leaders who advocate for family-focused policies is an important part of the work we do to support our communities, and I was proud to speak with Rep. Dingell about this issue today.”

    According to Bridge Michigan, the child care crisis costs Michigan $2.9 billion annually in turnover and lost taxes. 

    The cost of childcare has risen more than 30% in the last six years. In more than half of the states in America, the average annual cost of full-time child care is more than the average annual cost of in-state college tuition.

    The Department of Health and Human Services reported that a $52.5 billion investment in child care during the COVID-19 pandemic:

    1. provided stabilization grants to 220,000 providers associated with up to 10 million children;
    2. lowered child care costs for more than 700,000 children;
    3. increased compensation for more than 650,000 child care workers; and
    4. created 300,000 new child care slots. 

    View photos from the event here.

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Australian women are wary of AI being used in breast cancer screening – new research

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alison Pearce, Associate Professor, Health Economics, University of Sydney

    Okrasiuk/Shutterstock

    Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly relevant in many aspects of society, including health care. For example, it’s already used for robotic surgery and to provide virtual mental health support.

    In recent years, scientists have developed AI algorithms that can analyse mammograms for signs of breast cancer. These algorithms may be as good as or better at finding cancers than human radiologists, and save the health-care system money.

    At the same time, evidence for the accuracy of AI in breast cancer screening is still emerging. And we need to ensure the benefits would outweigh the risks, such as overdiagnosis. This is where small cancers are detected that wouldn’t cause harm, resulting in unnecessary treatment.

    In a new study, my colleagues and I wanted to understand how Australian women – who would be affected if AI were to be introduced into breast screening in the future – feel about the technology.

    AI and breast cancer screening

    Breast cancer screening programs reduce the number of women who die from breast cancer by finding cancer early.

    In Australia, as in many countries around the world, two specially trained health professionals, usually radiologists, review each screening mammogram for signs of cancer. If the two radiologists disagree, a third is consulted.

    This double reading approach improves cancer detection rates without recalling too many women for further testing unnecessarily. However, it’s resource intensive. And there’s currently a shortage of radiologists worldwide.

    AI has been investigated to support radiologists, replace a radiologist, or as a triage tool to identify the mammograms at highest risk so these can be reviewed by a radiologist. However, there’s no consensus yet as to how to best implement AI in breast cancer screening.

    Breast cancer screening programs reduce the number of women who die from breast cancer.
    YAKOBCHUK VIACHESLAV/Shutterstock

    Our study

    The success of cancer screening programs depends on high rates of participation. While people are generally receptive to AI, in previous research, many have reported being unwilling to trust AI with their health care.

    There are concerns introducing AI into breast cancer screening programs could jeopardise screening participation rates if people do not trust AI.

    We asked 802 women if and how they thought AI should be implemented in breast cancer screening. Our sample was generally representative of the population of women in Australia eligible for screening.

    We measured how their preferences were influenced by factors such as:

    • how the AI was used (whether it supplemented radiologists, replaced one or both radiologists, or was used for triage)

    • how accurate the AI algorithm was

    • who owned the AI algorithm (for example, the Australian government department of health, an Australian company or an international company)

    • how representative the algorithm was of the Australian population (for example, the algorithm may not work as well for people from some ethnic groups)

    • how privacy was managed

    • how long patients had to wait for the results of their mammogram.

    We used the responses to assess which factors were most important and how the introduction of AI might influence participation in breast cancer screening.

    Before the survey, we provided participants with information about AI and how it could be used in breast cancer screening. The information we provided may have changed participants’ beliefs and preferences around the use of AI in this context relative to the general population. This could be a limitation of our study.

    What we found

    Overall, we saw mixed reactions to the introduction of AI into breast cancer screening. Some 40% of respondents were open to using AI, on the condition it was more accurate than human radiologists. In contrast, 42% were strongly opposed to using AI, while 18% had reservations.

    In general, participants wanted AI to be accurate, Australian-owned, representative of Australian women, and faster than human radiologists before implementation.

    Notably, up to 22% of respondents reported they might be less likely to participate in breast cancer screening if AI was implemented in a way that made them uncomfortable.

    It’s possible attitudes to AI may differ in contexts with different social values or existing screening practices to Australia. But our findings were broadly consistent with what we see in other countries.

    Around the world, women are generally receptive to the benefits of AI in breast cancer screening. But they feel strongly that AI should supplement or support clinicians, rather than replace them.

    The success of breast cancer screening programs depends on high rates of participation.
    Monkey Business Images/Shutterstock

    We need to proceed carefully

    AI holds promise for improving the effectiveness and efficiency of breast cancer screening in the future.

    That said, these benefits may be offset if screening participation goes down. This is particularly concerning in Australia, where participation rates in BreastScreen are already relatively low (less than 50%).

    Implementing AI without addressing community concerns around the accuracy, ownership, privacy and implementation model could undermine trust in breast cancer screening programs.

    Policymakers should carefully consider community concerns about the implementation of AI technology in health care before proceeding. And breast cancer screening participants will need reliable information to understand the risks and benefits of AI in screening services.

    If this is not done properly, and screening participation falls lower as a result, this could lead to more breast cancers being diagnosed later and therefore being harder to treat.

    Alison Pearce received funding from Sydney Cancer Institute for this project.

    – ref. Australian women are wary of AI being used in breast cancer screening – new research – https://theconversation.com/australian-women-are-wary-of-ai-being-used-in-breast-cancer-screening-new-research-253340

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: NC Health and Human Services Secretary Dev Sangvai Visits Cherry Hospital

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: NC Health and Human Services Secretary Dev Sangvai Visits Cherry Hospital

    NC Health and Human Services Secretary Dev Sangvai Visits Cherry Hospital
    stonizzo
    Tue, 04/22/2025 – 15:10

    North Carolina Health and Human Services Secretary Dev Sangvai today visited Cherry Hospital in Goldsboro, one of three psychiatric hospitals operated by the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services. Cherry Hospital serves 38 counties in the eastern region of the state with a mission to provide excellent psychiatric care to individuals with the greatest need and the fewest resources. 

    The Secretary was joined by Chief Deputy Secretary Dr. ClarLynda Williams-Devane, Deputy   Secretary for Health Karen Burkes, Assistant Director of State Psychiatric Hospitals Heather Brewer and Cherry Hospital leadership and staff to tour the treatment mall, patient units and the on-site Riverbend Middle/ High School. 

    During the visit, NCDHHS leadership and Cherry Hospital staff discussed successes and challenges the state-operated facility faces. Some of the challenges include recruiting full-time healthcare staff and the dire need for an updated budget that reflects an increase in staff cost, food and utilities. Currently, the staffing vacancy rate is more than 21% with nearly 200 open positions.

    The staffing challenge limits Cherry Hospital’s operating capacity to 178 beds, although the facility has the physical capacity for 259 beds. The Senate budget proposal eliminates hundreds of NCDHHS positions, including many at the state psychiatric hospitals, which would limit the ability to staff and operate more beds. If the position eliminations in the Senate Budget proposal become law, this cut would permanently reduce the number of patients the facilities can serve.  

    “Workers who care for and ensure the health of North Carolinians are the backbone of our ability to prosper as a state,” said NC Health and Human Services Secretary Dev Sangvai. “We need to retain these positions and funding for the Department to attract and maintain staff in critical positions.”  

    Leadership at Cherry Hospital shared their priority to implement electronic health records which is expected to launch this year at state health facilities to modernize records, improve healthcare quality and increase efficiency. They also discussed Cherry Hospital’s enhanced support for community and jail-based capacity restoration services for patients determined to be Incapable to Proceed to trial. Last week, NCDHHS announced the launch of capacity restoration services at the Wake County Detention Center, which followed the success of expanded services in Mecklenburg and Pitt Counties. Pitt County covers the catchment area for Cherry Hospital.

    Apr 22, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: FS Bancorp, Inc. Reports First Quarter Net Income of $8.0 Million or $1.01 Per Diluted Share and the Forty-Ninth Consecutive Quarterly Cash Dividend

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, Wash., April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — FS Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ: FSBW) (the “Company”), the holding company for 1st Security Bank of Washington (the “Bank”) today reported 2025 first quarter net income of $8.0 million, or $1.01 per diluted share, compared to $8.4 million, or $1.06 per diluted share, for the comparable quarter one year ago. 

    “Deposit growth exceeded expectations in the first quarter of 2025, enabling the Bank to be well positioned for our loan pipeline going into the second quarter,” stated Matthew Mullet, President/CFO.

    “We are also pleased that our Board of Directors approved our forty-ninth consecutive quarterly cash dividend of $0.28 per common share, demonstrating our continued commitment to returning value to shareholders.  The cash dividend will be paid on May 22, 2025, to shareholders of record as of May 8, 2025,” noted Joe Adams, CEO.

    2025 First Quarter Highlights

    • Net income was $8.0 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to $7.4 million for the previous quarter, and $8.4 million for the comparable quarter one year ago;
    • Total deposits increased $275.7 million, or 11.8%, to $2.62 billion at March 31, 2025, primarily due to an increase of $226.9 million in brokered deposits, compared to $2.34 billion at December 31, 2024, and increased $149.9 million, or 6.1%, from $2.47 billion at March 31, 2024.  Noninterest-bearing deposits were $676.7 million at March 31, 2025, $638.2 million at December 31, 2024, and $646.9 million at March 31, 2024, reflecting growth in core deposits; 
    • Borrowings decreased $239.0 million, or 77.6% to $68.8 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $307.8 million at December 31, 2024, and decreased $61.1 million, or 47.0%, from $129.9 million at March 31, 2024, and were primarily repositioned into wholesale brokered CDs noted above; 
    • Loans receivable, net was virtually unchanged at $2.50 billion at both March 31, 2025, and December 31, 2024, and increased $85.7 million, or 3.5%, from $2.42 billion at March 31, 2024;
    • Consumer loans, of which 87.4% are home improvement loans, decreased $11.3 million, or 1.8%, to $608.9 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $620.2 million in the previous quarter, and decreased $37.2 million, or 5.8%, from $646.1 million in the comparable quarter one year ago. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, consumer loan originations included 79.9% of home improvement loans originated with a Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”) score above 720;
    • Repurchased 98,317 shares of the Company’s common stock in the first quarter of 2025 at an average price of $39.06 per share with $873,000 remaining for future purchases under the existing share repurchase plan. On April 4, 2025, the Board authorized an additional share repurchase program of up to $5.0 million of the Company’s common stock;
    • Book value per share increased $0.86 to $39.12 at March 31, 2025, compared to $38.26 at December 31, 2024, and increased $3.06 from $36.06 at March 31, 2024.  Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP financial measure) increased $0.94 to $36.96 at March 31, 2025, compared to $36.02 at December 31, 2024, and increased $3.49 from $33.47 at March 31, 2024. See, “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
    • Segment reporting in the first quarter of 2025 reflected net income of $7.8 million for the Commercial and Consumer Banking segment and $241,000 for the Home Lending segment, compared to net income of $7.4 million and net loss of $39,000 in the prior quarter, and net income of $8.2 million and $246,000 in the first quarter of 2024, respectively; and
    • Regulatory capital ratios at the Bank were 14.4% for total risk-based capital and 11.3% for Tier 1 leverage capital at March 31, 2025, compared to 14.2% for total risk-based capital and 11.2% for Tier 1 leverage capital at December 31, 2024.

    Segment Reporting

    The Company reports on two segments: Commercial and Consumer Banking and Home Lending. The Commercial and Consumer Banking segment provides diversified financial products and services to our commercial and consumer customers. These products and services include deposit products; residential, consumer, business and commercial real estate lending and cash management services. This segment is also responsible for managing the Bank’s investment portfolio and other assets. The Home Lending segment originates one-to-four-family residential mortgage loans primarily for sale in the secondary markets as well as loans held for investment.

    The tables below provide a summary of segment reporting at or for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 (dollars in thousands):

        At or For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2025  
    Condensed income statement:   Commercial and
    Consumer Banking
        Home Lending     Total  
    Net interest income (1)   $ 28,407     $ 2,575     $ 30,982  
    Provision for credit losses     (1,321 )     (271 )     (1,592 )
    Noninterest income (2)     2,246       2,880       5,126  
    Noninterest expense (3)     (20,176 )     (4,879 )     (25,055 )
    Income before provision for income taxes     9,156       305       9,461  
    Provision for income taxes     (1,376 )     (64 )     (1,440 )
    Net income   $ 7,780     $ 241     $ 8,021  
    Total average assets for period ended   $ 2,414,100     $ 618,412     $ 3,032,512  
    Full-time employees (“FTEs”)     454       113       567  
                             
        At or For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2024
    Condensed income statement:   Commercial and
    Consumer Banking
      Home Lending   Total
    Net interest income (1)   $ 28,086     $ 2,260     $ 30,346  
    Provision for credit losses     (1,251 )     (148 )     (1,399 )
    Noninterest income (2)     2,393       2,718       5,111  
    Noninterest expense (3)     (19,008 )     (4,521 )     (23,529 )
    Income before provision for income taxes     10,220       309       10,529  
    Provision for income taxes     (2,069 )     (63 )     (2,132 )
    Net income   $ 8,151     $ 246     $ 8,397  
    Total average assets for period ended   $ 2,401,864     $ 556,683     $ 2,958,547  
    FTEs     440       130       570  
                             

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Net interest income is the difference between interest earned on assets and the cost of liabilities to fund those assets. Interest earned includes actual interest earned on segment assets and, if the segment has excess liabilities, interest credits for providing funding to the other segment. The cost of liabilities includes interest expense on segment liabilities and, if the segment does not have enough liabilities to fund its assets, a funding charge based on the cost of assigned liabilities to fund segment assets.
    (2 ) Noninterest income includes activity from certain residential mortgage loans that were initially originated for sale and measured at fair value and subsequently transferred to loans held for investment. Gains and losses from changes in fair value for these loans are reported in earnings as a component of noninterest income. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company recorded a net increase in fair value of $263,000, compared to a net increase in fair value of $2,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2024. As of March 31, 2025 and 2024, there were $14.5 million and $15.0 million, respectively, in residential mortgage loans recorded at fair value as they were previously transferred from loans held for sale to loans held for investment.
    (3 ) Noninterest expense includes allocated overhead expense from general corporate activities. Allocation is determined based on a combination of segment assets and FTEs. For the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, the Home Lending segment included allocated overhead expenses of $1.8 million and $1.5 million, respectively.   
         

    Asset Summary

    Total assets increased $36.9 million, or 1.2%, to $3.07 billion at March 31, 2025, compared to $3.03 billion at December 31, 2024, and increased $96.4 million, or 3.2%, from $2.97 billion at March 31, 2024.  The increase in total assets at March 31, 2025, compared to December 31, 2024, included increases of $31.1 million in total cash and cash equivalents, $10.0 million in securities available-for-sale, $3.4 million in other assets, $3.2 million in loans held for sale (“HFS”) and $2.0 million in securities held-to-maturity, partially offset by decreases in FHLB stock of $10.4 million, loans receivable, net of $834,000 and core deposit intangible (“CDI”), net of $831,000. The increase compared to March 31, 2024, was primarily due to increases in loans receivable, net of $85.7 million, other assets of $21.1 million, total cash and cash equivalents of $17.3 million, and securities available-for-sale of $11.5 million. These increases were partially offset by decreases in certificates of deposit at other financial institutions of $22.0 million, loans HFS of $18.9 million, and CDI, net of $3.5 million.

    LOAN PORTFOLIO                                                                
    (Dollars in thousands)   March 31, 2025     December 31, 2024     March 31, 2024                  
    COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE (“CRE”) LOANS   Amount       %   Amount       %   Amount       %   Linked Quarter $ Change     Prior Year Quarter $ Change  
    CRE owner occupied   $ 164,911       6.5 %   $ 170,396       6.7 %   $ 174,946       7.2 %   $ (5,485 )   $ (10,035 )
    CRE non-owner occupied     174,188       6.9       174,921       6.9       184,109       7.5       (733 )     (9,921 )
    Commercial and speculative construction and development     288,978       11.4       280,798       11.1       244,217       10.0       8,180       44,761  
    Multi-family     244,940       9.7       245,222       9.7       222,410       9.1       (282 )     22,530  
    Total CRE loans     873,017       34.5       871,337       34.4       825,682       33.8       1,680       47,335  
                                                                     
    RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS                                                                
    One-to-four-family (excludes HFS)     637,299       25.2       617,322       24.4       580,050       23.7       19,977       57,249  
    Home equity     73,846       2.9       75,147       3.0       73,323       3.0       (1,301 )     523  
    Residential custom construction     48,810       1.9       49,902       2.0       57,129       2.3       (1,092 )     (8,319 )
    Total residential real estate loans     759,955       30.0       742,371       29.4       710,502       29.0       17,584       49,453  
                                                                     
    CONSUMER LOANS                                                                
    Indirect home improvement     532,038       21.0       541,946       21.4       568,802       23.2       (9,908 )     (36,764 )
    Marine     73,737       2.9       74,931       3.0       73,921       3.0       (1,194 )     (184 )
    Other consumer     3,118       0.1       3,304       0.1       3,409       0.1       (186 )     (291 )
    Total consumer loans     608,893       24.0       620,181       24.5       646,132       26.3       (11,288 )     (37,239 )
                                                                     
    COMMERCIAL BUSINESS LOANS                                                                
    Commercial and industrial (“C&I”)     274,956       10.9       287,014       11.3       256,429       10.6       (12,058 )     18,527  
    Warehouse lending     15,949       0.6       12,918       0.4       8,113       0.3       3,031       7,836  
    Total commercial business loans     290,905       11.5       299,932       11.7       264,542       10.9       (9,027 )     26,363  
    Total loans receivable, gross     2,532,770       100.0 %     2,533,821       100.0 %     2,446,858       100.0 %     (1,051 )     85,912  
                                                                     
    Allowance for credit losses on loans     (31,653 )             (31,870 )             (31,479 )             217       (174 )
    Total loans receivable, net   $ 2,501,117             $ 2,501,951             $ 2,415,379             $ (834 )   $ 85,738  
                                                                     

    The composition of CRE loans at the dates indicated were as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)   Mar 31, 2025     Dec 31, 2024     Mar 31, 2024  
    CRE by Type:   Amount     Amount     Amount  
    CRE non-owner occupied:                  
    Office   $ 39,406     $ 39,697     $ 41,625  
    Retail     35,520       36,568       38,712  
    Hospitality/restaurant     27,377       27,562       24,751  
    Self-storage     19,092       19,111       21,383  
    Mixed use     18,868       17,721       19,186  
    Industrial     15,033       15,125       17,475  
    Senior housing/assisted living     7,506       7,565       8,446  
    Other (1)     6,579       6,631       6,785  
    Land     2,314       2,421       3,151  
    Education/worship     2,493       2,520       2,595  
    Total CRE non-owner occupied     174,188       174,921       184,109  
    CRE owner occupied:                  
    Agriculture     3,990       3,834       3,744  
    Industrial     66,618       67,064       63,683  
    Office     40,447       42,223       41,652  
    Retail     20,535       20,718       21,836  
    Hospitality/restaurant     7,306       10,396       10,933  
    Other (2)     8,529       8,612       8,438  
    Car wash     —       —       7,713  
    Automobile related     7,266       7,325       7,479  
    Education/worship     4,641       4,608       4,604  
    Mixed use     5,579       5,616       4,864  
    Total CRE owner occupied     164,911       170,396       174,946  
    Total     339,099       345,317       359,055  

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Primarily includes loans secured by mobile home parks totaling $758,000, $766,000, and $789,000, RV parks totaling $681,000, $685,000, and $696,000, automobile-related collateral totaling $584,000, $589,000, and $604,000, and other collateral totaling $4.6 million, $4.6 million, and $4.7 million at March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2024, respectively.
    (2 ) Primarily includes loans secured by gas stations totaling $1.5 million, $1.5 million and $1.7 million, non-profit organization totaling $1.4 million, $1.5 million and $915,000, and other collateral totaling $5.6 million, $5.6 million and $5.8 million at March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024, and March 31, 2024, respectively.
         

    The following table includes CRE loans repricing or maturing within the next two years, excluding loans that reprice simultaneously with changes to the prime rate:

    (Dollars in thousands)     For the Quarter Ended          
    CRE by type:   Jun 30, 2025   Sep 30, 2025   Dec 31, 2025   Mar 31, 2026   Jun 30, 2026   Sep 30, 2026   Dec 31, 2026   Mar 31, 2027   Total   Current Weighted
    Average Rate
    Agriculture   $ 723   $ —   $ 312   $ 175   $ —   $ 292   $ —   $ —   $ 1,502   6.14 %
    Apartment     4,510     1,701     18,573     1,268     13,868     9,763     8,241     27,900     85,824   5.65  
    Auto related     790     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     790   4.15  
    Hotel / hospitality     1,760     1,315     —     115     1,265     —     —     —     4,455   4.75  
    Industrial     —     161     10,122     981     590     1,594     —     13,481     26,929   5.13  
    Mixed use     3,469     244     313     2,119     —     —     382     —     6,527   5.74  
    Office     11,077     4,127     966     519     1,641     559     7,749     2,878     29,516   4.96  
    Other     1,309     1,147     241     890     —     2,493     1,497     283     7,860   5.05  
    Retail     1,738     63     —     436     3,474     —     3,423     3,059     12,193   4.11  
    Senior housing and assisted living     —     —     —     2,157     —     —     —     —     2,157   4.75 %
    Total   $ 25,376   $ 8,758   $ 30,527   $ 8,660   $ 20,838   $ 14,701   $ 21,292   $ 47,601   $ 177,753    
                                                               

    A breakdown of construction loans at the dates indicated were as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)   March 31, 2025     December 31, 2024  
    Construction Types:   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent  
    Commercial construction – retail   $ 8,157       2.4 %   $ 8,079       2.4 %
    Commercial construction – office     6,487       1.9       4,979       1.5  
    Commercial construction – self storage     16,012       4.7       13,480       4.1  
    Commercial construction – hotel     402       0.1       —       —  
    Multi-family     31,275       9.3       30,945       9.4  
    Custom construction – single family residential and single family manufactured residential     41,143       12.2       42,040       12.7  
    Custom construction – land, lot and acquisition and development     7,667       2.3       7,862       2.4  
    Speculative residential construction – vertical     186,042       55.1       180,381       54.5  
    Speculative residential construction – land, lot and acquisition and development     40,603       12.0       42,934       13.0  
    Total   $ 337,788       100.0 %   $ 330,700       100.0 %
                                     
    (Dollars in thousands)   March 31, 2025     March 31, 2024  
    Construction Types:   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent  
    Commercial construction – retail   $ 8,157       2.4 %   $ 8,290       2.8 %
    Commercial construction – office     6,487       1.9       4,737       1.6  
    Commercial construction – self storage     16,012       4.7       10,000       3.3  
    Commercial construction – hotel     402       0.1       7,807       2.6  
    Multi-family     31,275       9.3       53,288       17.7  
    Custom construction – single family residential and single family manufactured residential     41,143       12.2       50,674       16.8  
    Custom construction – land, lot and acquisition and development     7,667       2.3       6,455       2.1  
    Speculative residential construction – vertical     186,042       55.1       134,047       44.5  
    Speculative residential construction – land, lot and acquisition and development     40,603       12.0       26,048       8.6  
    Total   $ 337,788       100.0 %   $ 301,346       100.0 %
                                     

    Originations of one-to-four-family loans to purchase and refinance a home for the periods indicated were as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)   For the Three Months Ended                  
        March 31, 2025     December 31, 2024                  
        Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     $ Change     % Change  
    Purchase   $ 120,719       83.0 %   $ 129,232       83.2 %   $ (8,513 )     (6.6 )%
    Refinance     24,677       17.0       26,116       16.8       (1,439 )     (5.5 )%
    Total   $ 145,396       100.0 %   $ 155,348       100.0 %   $ (9,952 )     (6.4 )%
                                                     
    (Dollars in thousands)   For the Three Months Ended March 31,                  
        2025     2024                  
        Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     $ Change     % Change  
    Purchase   $ 120,719       83.0 %   $ 135,577       88.1 %   $ (14,858 )     (11.0 )%
    Refinance     24,677       17.0       18,371       11.9       6,306       34.3 %
    Total   $ 145,396       100.0 %   $ 153,948       100.0 %   $ (8,552 )     (5.6 )%
                                                     

    During the quarter ended March 31, 2025, the Company sold $91.9 million of one-to-four-family loans compared to $138.9 million during the previous quarter and $93.9 million during the same quarter one year ago. The decrease in the volume of loans sold during the current quarter compared to the prior quarter was primarily due to seasonal factors combined with economic volatility. Gross margins on home loan sales increased to 3.26% for the quarter ended March 31, 2025, compared to 3.14% in the previous quarter and decreased from 3.43% in the same quarter one year ago. Gross margins are defined as the margin on loans sold (cash sales) without the impact of deferred costs.

    Liabilities and Equity Summary

    Changes in deposits at the dates indicated were as follows:

    (Dollars in thousands)                                                
        March 31, 2025     December 31, 2024                  
    Transactional deposits:   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     $ Change     % Change  
    Noninterest-bearing checking   $ 659,417       25.2 %   $ 627,679       26.8 %   $ 31,738       5.1 %
    Interest-bearing checking (1)     201,469       7.7       176,561       7.5       24,908       14.1  
    Escrow accounts related to mortgages serviced (2)     17,289       0.7       10,479       0.5       6,810       65.0  
    Subtotal     878,175       33.6       814,719       34.8       63,456       7.8  
    Savings     160,332       6.1       154,188       6.6       6,144       4.0  
    Money market (3)     343,349       13.1       341,615       14.6       1,734       0.5  
    Subtotal     503,681       19.2       495,803       21.2       7,878       1.6  
    Certificates of deposit less than $100,000 (4)     639,947       24.5       440,257       18.8       199,690       45.4  
    Certificates of deposit of $100,000 through $250,000     450,836       17.2       455,594       19.5       (4,758 )     (1.0 )
    Certificates of deposit greater than $250,000     142,512       5.5       133,045       5.7       9,467       7.1  
    Subtotal     1,233,295       47.2       1,028,896       44.0       204,399       19.9  
    Total   $ 2,615,151       100.0 %   $ 2,339,418       100.0 %   $ 275,733       11.8 %
                                                     
    (Dollars in thousands)                                                
        March 31, 2025     March 31, 2024                  
    Transactional deposits:   Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent     $ Change     % Change  
    Noninterest-bearing checking   $ 659,417       25.2 %   $ 618,526       25.1 %   $ 40,891       6.6 %
    Interest-bearing checking (1)     201,469       7.7       188,050       7.6       13,419       7.1  
    Escrow accounts related to mortgages serviced (2)     17,289       0.7       28,373       1.2       (11,084 )     (39.1 )
    Subtotal     878,175       33.6       834,949       33.9       43,226       5.2  
    Savings     160,332       6.1       153,025       6.2       7,307       4.8  
    Money market (3)     343,349       13.1       364,944       14.8       (21,595 )     (5.9 )
    Subtotal     503,681       19.2       517,969       21.0       (14,288 )     (2.8 )
    Certificates of deposit less than $100,000 (4)     639,947       24.5       579,153       23.5       60,794       10.5  
    Certificates of deposit of $100,000 through $250,000     450,836       17.2       424,463       17.2       26,373       6.2  
    Certificates of deposit greater than $250,000     142,512       5.5       108,763       4.4       33,749       31.0  
    Subtotal     1,233,295       47.2       1,112,379       45.1       120,916       10.9  
    Total   $ 2,615,151       100.0 %   $ 2,465,297       100.0 %   $ 149,854       6.1 %
                                                     

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Includes $30.1 million of brokered deposits at March 31, 2025, and no brokered deposits at December 31, 2024, and at March 31, 2024.                  
    (2 ) Primarily noninterest-bearing accounts based on applicable state law.
    (3 ) Includes $251,000, $279,000 and $8.0 million of brokered deposits at March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2024, respectively.
    (4 ) Includes $339.9 million, $143.1 million, and $331.3 million of brokered deposits at March 31, 2025, December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2024, respectively.
         

    At March 31, 2025, CDs, which include retail and non-retail CDs, totaled $1.23 billion, compared to $1.03 billion at December 31, 2024 and $1.11 billion at March 31, 2024, with non-retail CDs representing 28.5%, 15.0% and 31.0% of total CDs at such dates, respectively. At March 31, 2025, non-retail CDs, which include brokered CDs, online CDs and public funds CDs, increased $196.9 million to $351.7 million, compared to $154.8 million at December 31, 2024, primarily due to an increase of $196.8 million in brokered CDs.  The increase in brokered CDs provided funds to pay down higher cost borrowings. Non-retail CDs totaled $351.7 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $344.5 million at March 31, 2024.

    At March 31, 2025, the Bank had uninsured deposits of approximately $679.4 million, compared to approximately $652.7 million at December 31, 2024, and $614.1 million at March 31, 2024.  The uninsured amounts are estimates based on the methodologies and assumptions used for the Bank’s regulatory reporting requirements.

    At March 31, 2025, borrowings decreased $239.0 million to $68.8 million at March 31, 2025, from $307.8 million at December 31, 2024, and decreased $61.1 million from $129.9 million at March 31, 2024. These borrowings were comprised solely of FHLB advances.

    Total stockholders’ equity increased $3.1 million to $298.8 million at March 31, 2025, from $295.8 million at December 31, 2024, and increased $20.9 million, from $277.9 million at March 31, 2024. The increase in stockholders’ equity at March 31, 2025, compared to December 31, 2024, was primarily due to net income of $8.0 million and $513,000 in equity award compensation, partially offset by share repurchases of $3.8 million and cash dividends paid of $2.2 million. Stockholders’ equity was also impacted by decreases in unrealized net losses on securities available for sale of $2.7 million, net of tax, and decreases in unrealized net gains on fair value and cash flow hedges of $2.6 million, net of tax, reflecting changes in market interest rates during the quarter, resulting in a $151,000 decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax. Book value per common share was $39.12 at March 31, 2025, compared to $38.26 at December 31, 2024, and $36.06 at March 31, 2024.

    The Bank is considered “well capitalized” under the capital requirements established by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) with a total risk-based capital ratio of 14.4%, a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 11.3%, and a common equity Tier 1 (“CET1”) capital ratio of 13.2% at March 31, 2025.

    The Company exceeded all regulatory capital requirements with a total risk-based capital ratio of 14.7%, a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 9.9%, and a CET1 ratio of 11.5% at March 31, 2025.

    Credit Quality

    The allowance for credit losses on loans (“ACLL”) was $31.7 million, or 1.25% of gross loans receivable (excluding loans HFS) at March 31, 2025, compared to $31.9 million, or 1.26% of gross loans receivable (excluding loans HFS), at December 31, 2024, and $31.5 million, or 1.29% of gross loans receivable (excluding loans HFS), at March 31, 2024. The slight decrease in the ACLL at March 31, 2025, compared to the prior quarter was primarily due to a decrease in the balance of higher risk consumer loans.  The increase of $174,000 in the ACLL from the same quarter the prior year was primarily due to increases in CRE loans. The allowance for credit losses on unfunded loan commitments increased $66,000 to $1.5 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $1.4 million at December 31, 2024, and decreased $35,000 from $1.5 million at March 31, 2024, primarily due to an increase in the volume of unfunded commitments on construction loans

    Nonperforming loans increased $870,000 to $14.5 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $13.6 million at December 31, 2024, and increased $2.4 million from $12.1 million at March 31, 2024. The increase in nonperforming loans compared to the prior quarter was primarily due to increases in nonperforming CRE construction and development loans of $1.5 million, nonperforming indirect home improvement loans of $1.1 million, and nonperforming one-to-four-family loans of $970,000, partially offset by decreases in nonperforming CRE loans of $1.6 million and nonperforming commercial business loans of $1.5 million. The increase in nonperforming loans compared to the same quarter the prior year was primarily due to increases in nonperforming construction and development loans of $1.8 million, nonperforming one-to-four-family loans of $961,000, and nonperforming indirect home improvement loans of $626,000, partially offset by a decrease in nonperforming commercial business loans of $1.4 million.

    Loans classified as substandard increased $602,000 to $23.5 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $22.9 million at December 31, 2024, and decreased $1.4 million from $24.9 million at March 31, 2024.  The increase in substandard loans compared to the prior quarter was primarily due to an increase of $1.5 million in CRE construction and development loans, $1.1 million in indirect home improvement loans, and $953,000 in one-to-four-family loans, partially offset by decreases in commercial business loans of $1.8 million and CRE of $1.6 million.  The decrease in substandard loans compared to the prior year was primarily due to decreases of $3.1 million in C&I loans and $1.9 million in CRE loans, partially offset by increases of $1.8 million in CRE construction and development loans, $794,000 in one-to-four-family loans, and $626,000 in indirect home improvement loans. 

    Operating Results

    Net interest income increased $636,000 to $31.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, from $30.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024, primarily due to an increase in total interest income of $1.9 million, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $1.3 million. The $1.9 million increase in total interest income was primarily due to an increase of $2.3 million in interest income on loans receivable, including fees, primarily as a result of net loan growth and variable rate loans repricing higher. The $1.3 million increase in total interest expense was primarily the result of higher market interest rates and a net increase in interest bearing liabilities.

    NIM (annualized) increased six basis points to 4.32% for the three months ended March 31, 2025, from 4.26% for the same period in the prior year. The increase in NIM for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024, reflects the increased yields on interest-earning assets. 

    The average total cost of funds, including noninterest-bearing checking, increased 17 basis points to 2.38% for the three months ended March 31, 2025, from 2.21% for the three months ended March 31, 2024. This increase was predominantly due to higher market rates for borrowings. 

    For the three months ended March 31, 2025, the provision for credit losses on loans was $1.5 million, compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024. The provision for credit losses on loans reflects an increase in charge-off activity. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, net charge-offs increased $247,000 to $1.7 million, compared to $1.5 million for the same period last year. This increase was the result of increased net charge-offs of $487,000 in indirect home improvement loans and $25,000 in commercial business loans, partially offset by a net reduction of net charge-offs of $213,000 in marine loans and $46,000 in other consumer loans. Management attributes the increase in net charge-offs over the year primarily to volatile economic conditions.

    Total noninterest income was unchanged at $5.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024. Total noninterest expense was $25.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, compared to $23.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024.  The $1.5 million increase was primarily due to a $976,000 increase in salaries and benefits and a $437,000 increase in operations expense.

    About FS Bancorp

    FS Bancorp, Inc., a Washington corporation, is the holding company for 1st Security Bank of Washington. The Bank offers a range of loan and deposit services primarily to small- and middle-market businesses and individuals in Washington and Oregon.  It operates through 27 bank branches, one headquarters office that provides loans and deposit services, and loan production offices in various suburban communities in the greater Puget Sound area, the Kennewick-Pasco-Richland metropolitan area of Washington, also known as the Tri-Cities, and in Vancouver, Washington. Additionally, the Bank services home mortgage customers across the Northwest, focusing on markets in Washington State including the Puget Sound, Tri-Cities, and Vancouver.

    Forward-Looking Statements

    When used in this press release and in other documents filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), in press releases or other public stockholder communications, or in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer, the words or phrases “believe,” “will,” “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project,” “plans,” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but instead represent management’s current expectations and forecasts regarding future events, many of which are inherently uncertain and outside of our control. Actual results may differ, possibly materially from those currently expected or projected in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements, include but are not limited to, the following: adverse impacts to economic conditions in the Company’s local market areas, other markets where the Company has lending relationships, or other aspects of the Company’s business operations or financial markets, including, without limitation, as a result of employment levels; labor shortages, the effects of inflation, a recession or slowed economic growth; changes in the interest rate environment, including the increases and decrease in the Federal Reserve benchmark rate and duration at which such interest rate levels are maintained, which could adversely affect our revenues and expenses, the values of our assets and obligations, and the availability and cost of capital and liquidity; the impact of inflation and the current and future monetary policies of the Federal Reserve in response thereto; the effects of any federal government shutdown;  increased competitive pressures, including repricing and competitors’ pricing initiatives, and their impact on our market position, loan, and deposit products; adverse changes in the securities markets, the Company’s ability to execute its plans to grow its residential construction lending, mortgage banking, and warehouse lending operations, and the geographic expansion of its indirect home improvement lending; challenges arising from expanding into new geographic markets, products, or services; secondary market conditions for loans and the Company’s ability to originate loans for sale and sell loans in the secondary market; volatility in the mortgage industry; fluctuations in deposits; liquidity issues, including our ability to borrow funds or raise additional capital, if necessary; the impact of bank failures or adverse developments at other banks and related negative press about the banking industry in general on investor and depositor sentiment; legislative and regulatory changes, including changes in banking, securities and tax law, in regulatory policies and principles, or the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules; disruptions, security breaches, or other adverse events, failures or interruptions in, or attacks on, our information technology systems or on the third-party vendors who perform critical processing functions for us; the potential for new or increased tariffs, trade restrictions or geopolitical tensions that could affect economic activity or specific industry sectors; environmental, social and governance goals; the effects of climate change, severe weather events, natural disasters, pandemics, epidemics and other public health crises, acts of war or terrorism, civil unrest and other external events on our business; and other factors described in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and other reports filed with or furnished to the SEC which are available on its website at www.fsbwa.com and on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. 

    Any of the forward-looking statements that the Company makes in this press release and in the other public statements are based upon management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made and may turn out to be incorrect because of the inaccurate assumptions the Company might make, because of the factors illustrated above or because of other factors that cannot be foreseen by the Company. Therefore, these factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. The Company does not undertake and specifically disclaims any obligation to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements. 

    FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
    (Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)
                                         
                                Linked     Prior Year  
        March 31,     December 31,     March 31,     Quarter     Quarter  
        2025     2024     2024     % Change     % Change  
    ASSETS                                        
    Cash and due from banks   $ 18,657     $ 19,280     $ 17,149       (3 )     9  
    Interest-bearing deposits at other financial institutions     44,084       12,355       28,257       257       56  
    Total cash and cash equivalents     62,741       31,635       45,406       98       38  
    Certificates of deposit at other financial institutions     1,234       1,727       23,222       (29 )     (95 )
    Securities available-for-sale, at fair value     291,133       281,175       279,643       4       4  
    Securities held-to-maturity, net     10,434       8,455       8,455       23       23  
    Loans held for sale, at fair value     31,038       27,835       49,957       12       (38 )
    Loans receivable, net     2,501,117       2,501,951       2,415,379       —       4  
    Accrued interest receivable     14,406       13,881       14,455       4       —  
    Premises and equipment, net     29,451       29,756       30,326       (1 )     (3 )
    Operating lease right-of-use     4,979       5,378       6,202       (7 )     (20 )
    Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost     5,256       15,621       2,909       (66 )     81  
    Deferred tax asset, net     7,009       7,059       4,832       (1 )     45  
    Bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”), net     38,778       38,528       37,958       1       2  
    MSRs, held at the lower of cost or fair value     8,926       9,204       9,009       (3 )     (1 )
    Goodwill     3,592       3,592       3,592       —       —  
    Core deposit intangible, net     12,879       13,710       16,402       (6 )     (21 )
    Other assets     43,105       39,670       21,958       9       96  
    TOTAL ASSETS   $ 3,066,078     $ 3,029,177     $ 2,969,705       1       3  
    LIABILITIES                                        
    Deposits:                                        
    Noninterest-bearing accounts   $ 676,706     $ 638,158     $ 646,899       6       5  
    Interest-bearing accounts     1,938,445       1,701,260       1,818,398       14       7  
    Total deposits     2,615,151       2,339,418       2,465,297       12       6  
    Borrowings     68,805       307,806       129,940       (78 )     (47 )
    Subordinated notes:                                        
    Principal amount     50,000       50,000       50,000       —       —  
    Unamortized debt issuance costs     (389 )     (406 )     (456 )     (4 )     (15 )
    Total subordinated notes less unamortized debt issuance costs     49,611       49,594       49,544       —       —  
    Operating lease liability     5,149       5,556       6,410       (7 )     (20 )
    Other liabilities     28,522       31,036       40,582       (8 )     (30 )
    Total liabilities     2,767,238       2,733,410       2,691,773       1       3  
    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES                                        
    STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY                                        
    Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding     —       —       —       —       —  
    Common stock, $.01 par value; 45,000,000 shares authorized; 7,742,907 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2025, 7,833,014 at December 31, 2024, and 7,805,795 at March 31, 2024     77       78       78       (1 )     (1 )
    Additional paid-in capital     52,806       55,716       57,552       (5 )     (8 )
    Retained earnings     262,945       257,113       236,720       2       11  
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax     (16,988 )     (17,140 )     (16,418 )     (1 )     3  
    Total stockholders’ equity     298,840       295,767       277,932       1       8  
    TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY   $ 3,066,078     $ 3,029,177     $ 2,969,705       1       3  
                                             
    FS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) (Unaudited)
                       
        Three Months Ended     Linked     Prior Year  
        Mar 31,     Dec 31,     Mar 31,     Quarter     Quarter  
        2025     2024     2024     % Change     % Change  
    INTEREST INCOME                                        
    Loans receivable, including fees   $ 43,303     $ 43,654     $ 40,997       (1 )     6  
    Interest and dividends on investment securities, cash and cash equivalents, and certificates of deposit at other financial institutions     3,485       3,320       3,883       5       (10 )
    Total interest and dividend income     46,788       46,974       44,880       —       4  
    INTEREST EXPENSE                                        
    Deposits     13,058       13,543       12,882       (4 )     1  
    Borrowings     2,263       1,831       1,167       24       94  
    Subordinated notes     485       486       485       —       —  
    Total interest expense     15,806       15,860       14,534       —       9  
    NET INTEREST INCOME     30,982       31,114       30,346       —       2  
    PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES     1,592       1,522       1,399       5       14  
    NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR CREDIT LOSSES     29,390       29,592       28,947       (1 )     2  
    NONINTEREST INCOME                                        
    Service charges and fee income     2,244       2,513       2,552       (11 )     (12 )
    Gain on sale of loans     1,700       1,733       1,838       (2 )     (8 )
    Gain on sale of MSRs     —       —       8,215       —       NM  
    Loss on sale of investment securities, net     —       —       (7,998 )     —       NM  
    Earnings on cash surrender value of BOLI     250       256       240       (2 )     4  
    Other noninterest income     932       108       264       763       253  
    Total noninterest income     5,126       4,610       5,111       11       —  
    NONINTEREST EXPENSE                                        
    Salaries and benefits     14,533       14,172       13,557       3       7  
    Operations     3,445       3,175       3,008       9       15  
    Occupancy     1,717       1,821       1,705       (6 )     1  
    Data processing     2,045       2,252       1,958       (9 )     4  
    Loan costs     548       781       585       (30 )     (6 )
    Professional and board fees     1,186       1,038       923       14       28  
    FDIC insurance     538       490       532       10       1  
    Marketing and advertising     221       329       227       (33 )     (3 )
    Amortization of core deposit intangible     831       876       941       (5 )     (12 )
    (Recovery) impairment of servicing rights     (9 )     (583 )     93       (98 )     (110 )
    Total noninterest expense     25,055       24,351       23,529       3       6  
    INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     9,461       9,851       10,529       (4 )     (10 )
    PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES     1,440       2,469       2,132       (42 )     (32 )
    NET INCOME   $ 8,021     $ 7,382     $ 8,397       9       (4 )
    Basic earnings per share   $ 1.02     $ 0.94     $ 1.07       9       (5 )
    Diluted earnings per share   $ 1.01     $ 0.92     $ 1.06       10       (5 )
                                             

    KEY FINANCIAL RATIOS AND DATA (Unaudited)

        At or For the Three Months Ended  
        March 31,     December 31,     March 31,  
    PERFORMANCE RATIOS:   2025     2024     2024  
    Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets) (1)     1.07 %     0.98 %     1.14 %
    Return on equity (ratio of net income to average total stockholders’ equity) (1)     10.80       9.88       12.29  
    Yield on average interest-earning assets (1)     6.53       6.51       6.30  
    Average total cost of funds (1)     2.38       2.38       2.21  
    Interest rate spread information – average during period     4.15       4.13       4.09  
    Net interest margin (1)     4.32       4.31       4.26  
    Operating expense to average total assets (1)     3.35       3.24       3.20  
    Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities (1)     142.94       143.27       144.51  
    Efficiency ratio (2)     69.39       68.16       66.36  
    Common equity ratio (ratio of stockholders’ equity to total assets)     9.75       9.76       9.36  
    Tangible common equity ratio (3)     9.26       9.25       8.74  
                             
        March 31,     December 31,     March 31,  
    ASSET QUALITY RATIOS AND DATA:   2025     2024     2024  
    Nonperforming assets to total assets at end of period (4)     0.47 %     0.45 %     0.41 %
    Nonperforming loans to total gross loans (excluding loans HFS) (5)     0.57       0.54       0.49  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans to nonperforming loans (5)     219.08       234.55       260.24  
    Allowance for credit losses – loans to total gross loans (excluding loans HFS)     1.25       1.26       1.29  
                             
        At or For the Three Months Ended    
        March 31,       December 31,       March 31,    
    PER COMMON SHARE DATA:   2025       2024       2024    
    Basic earnings per share   $ 1.02       $ 0.94       $ 1.07    
    Diluted earnings per share   $ 1.01       $ 0.92       $ 1.06    
    Weighted average basic shares outstanding     7,695,320         7,723,250         7,703,789    
    Weighted average diluted shares outstanding     7,805,728         7,897,099         7,824,460    
    Common shares outstanding at end of period     7,639,844   (6)     7,729,951   (7)     7,707,651   (8)
    Book value per share using common shares outstanding   $ 39.12       $ 38.26       $ 36.06    
    Tangible book value per share using common shares outstanding (9)   $ 36.96       $ 36.02       $ 33.47    
                                   

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Annualized.
    (2 ) Total noninterest expense as a percentage of net interest income and total noninterest income.
    (3 ) Represents a non-GAAP financial measure.  For a reconciliation to the most comparable GAAP financial measure, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
    (4 ) Nonperforming assets consist of nonperforming loans (which include nonaccruing loans and accruing loans more than 90 days past due), foreclosed real estate and other repossessed assets.
    (5 ) Nonperforming loans consist of nonaccruing loans and accruing loans 90 days or more past due.
    (6 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,742,907 at March 31, 2025, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (7 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,833,014 at December 31, 2024, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (8 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,805,795 at March 31, 2024, less 98,144 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (9 ) Tangible book value per share using outstanding common shares excludes intangible assets. This ratio represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.
         
    (Dollars in thousands)   For the Three Months Ended Mar 31,     Qtr. Over Qtr.  
    Average Balances   2025     2024     $ Change  
    Assets                        
    Loans receivable, net (1)   $ 2,559,944     $ 2,464,602     $ 95,342  
    Securities available-for-sale, at amortized cost     310,417       331,413       (20,996 )
    Securities held-to-maturity     8,656       8,500       156  
    Interest-bearing deposits and certificates of deposit at other financial institutions     16,161       59,514       (43,353 )
    FHLB stock, at cost     11,948       2,174       9,774  
    Total interest-earning assets     2,907,126       2,866,203       40,923  
    Noninterest-earning assets     125,386       92,344       33,042  
    Total assets   $ 3,032,512     $ 2,958,547     $ 73,965  
    Liabilities                        
    Interest-bearing deposit accounts   $ 1,765,605     $ 1,832,767     $ (67,162 )
    Borrowings     218,639       101,150       117,489  
    Subordinated notes     49,600       49,533       67  
    Total interest-bearing liabilities     2,033,844       1,983,450       50,394  
    Noninterest-bearing deposit accounts     663,824       657,083       6,741  
    Other noninterest-bearing liabilities     33,739       43,246       (9,507 )
    Total liabilities   $ 2,731,407     $ 2,683,779     $ 47,628  
                             

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Includes loans HFS.
         

    Non-GAAP Financial Measures:

    In addition to financial results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles utilized in the United States (“GAAP”), this earnings release presents non-GAAP financial measures that include tangible book value per share, and tangible common equity ratio. Management believes that providing the Company’s tangible book value per share and tangible common equity ratio is consistent with the capital treatment utilized by the investment community, which excludes intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios and facilitates comparison of the quality and composition of the Company’s capital over time and to its competitors. Where applicable, the Company has also presented comparable GAAP information.

    These non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied, and are not audited. They should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for total stockholders’ equity or operating results determined in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

    Reconciliation of the GAAP book value per share and common equity ratio and the non-GAAP tangible book value per share and tangible common equity ratio is presented below.

    (Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)   March 31,   December 31,   March 31,  
    Tangible Book Value Per Share:   2025   2024   2024  
    Stockholders’ equity (GAAP)   $ 298,840     $ 295,767     $ 277,932    
    Less: goodwill and core deposit intangible, net     (16,471 )     (17,302 )     (19,994 )  
    Tangible common stockholders’ equity (non-GAAP)   $ 282,369     $ 278,465     $ 257,938    
                         
    Common shares outstanding at end of period     7,639,844   (1)   7,729,951   (2)   7,707,651   (3)
                         
    Book value per share (GAAP)   $ 39.12     $ 38.26     $ 36.06    
    Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)   $ 36.96     $ 36.02     $ 33.47    
                         
    Tangible Common Equity Ratio:                    
    Total assets (GAAP)   $ 3,066,078     $ 3,029,177     $ 2,969,705    
    Less: goodwill and core deposit intangible assets     (16,471 )     (17,302 )     (19,994 )  
    Tangible assets (non-GAAP)   $ 3,049,607     $ 3,011,875     $ 2,949,711    
                         
    Common equity ratio (GAAP)     9.75 %      9.76 %      9.36 %   
    Tangible common equity ratio (non-GAAP)     9.26       9.25       8.74    
                               

    __________________________________

    (1 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,742,907 at March 31, 2025, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (2 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,833,014 at December 31, 2024, less 103,063 unvested restricted stock shares.
    (3 ) Common shares were calculated using shares outstanding of 7,805,795 at March 31, 2024, less 98,144 unvested restricted stock shares.
         

    Contacts:
    Joseph C. Adams,
    Chief Executive Officer

    Matthew D. Mullet,
    President/Chief Financial Officer

    (425) 771-5299
    www.FSBWA.com

    The MIL Network –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Gambling in Australia: how bad is the problem, who gets harmed most and where may we be heading?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alex Russell, Principal Research Fellow, CQUniversity Australia

    Mick Tsikas/AAP, Joel Carret/AAP, Darren England/AAP, Ihor Koptilin/Shutterstock, The Conversation, CC BY

    Gambling prevalence studies provide a snapshot of gambling behaviour, problems and harm in our communities. They are typically conducted about every five years.

    In some Australian states and territories, four or five have been conducted over the past 20 or so years. These have provided a snapshot into how gambling has changed – and how it has not.

    So, how has gambling in Australia changed in the past two decades or so, and where may we be heading?

    The intensification of gambling

    In 1997-98, the Productivity Commission found about 82% of Australians had gambled in the previous 12 months.

    Almost all further prevalence studies show the proportion of adults gambling has declined substantially over time.

    The 2024 NSW prevalence survey, for example, found 54% reported gambling in the previous 12 months, down from 69% in 2006.

    While fewer people are gambling, the proportion of people experiencing problems has not changed much, nor has gambling turnover.

    In some states, gambling turnover has increased, even when you take inflation into account.

    So while a smaller proportion of people are gambling, those who do gamble are doing so more frequently, and spend more money – a phenomenon we have described as the “intensification” of the industry.

    As figures from the Grattan Institute show, the vast majority of gambling spend comes from a very small proportion of people who gamble.

    What’s the problem?

    Typically, the focus in gambling studies has been on “problem gamblers”, a term we now avoid because it can be stigmatising.

    This refers to those experiencing severe problems due to their gambling, which is typically about 1% of the adult population, and around 2% of people who gamble.

    This doesn’t sound like much, until you remember 1% of adults in Australia is more than 200,000 people. That’s a lot of people struggling with severe problems.

    Based on recent prevalence surveys in Australia, these gamblers spend about 60 times as much as people who do not experience problems.

    However, that’s just the most severe cases.

    How gambling harms people

    When most people think of gambling harm, they think about financial harm. But gambling can cause problems with relationships, work and study, emotional and psychological harm, and even cause health issues.

    Some degree of gambling harm is experienced by around 10-15% of people who gamble.

    Some groups are overrepresented: young men typically experience very high levels of harm compared to others. Other overrepresented groups are:

    • those who have not completed tertiary education
    • people who speak a language other than English
    • people who identify as Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander.

    Harm isn’t just experienced by people who gamble, though – it impacts the people around them.

    While young men are more likely to experience harm from their own gambling, women, particularly young women, are most likely to experience harm from someone else’s gambling.

    When we take all of these sources of harm into account, we get a much better picture of gambling harm in our community: around 15-20% of all adults (not all gamblers) experience harm.

    That’s very different to the figure of 1% we’ve focused on in the past.

    We’re still missing some accounting, though: we don’t know how much harm is experienced by people under 18, for example, because prevalence studies typically only include adults.

    Where does the harm come from?

    The most problematic form in Australia is pokies, responsible for about 51-57% of problems.

    Casinos are responsible for another 10-14%, although fewer people have been gambling in casino games in recent years.




    Read more:
    Whatever happens to Star, the age of unfettered gambling revenue for casinos may have ended


    Sports betting and race betting together account for about another 19-20% of harm.

    Between them, pokies, casino games and sports and race betting account for about 90% of harm to Australian gamblers.

    Availability is an issue

    This widespread availability of pokies is the biggest single driver behind gambling harm in Australia.

    In other countries, pokies are limited to venues that are specifically used for gambling, like casinos or betting shops.

    We have pokies in a huge number of our pubs and clubs, except in Western Australia.

    A couple of years ago, we used national prevalence data to compare gambling problems in WA to the rest of the country.

    A higher percentage of adults in WA gamble, but mostly on the lotteries which are typically not associated with much harm.

    Gambling on pokies is far less prevalent in WA because they’re only available in one casino. Gambling problems and harm are about one-third lower in WA, and our analysis shows this can be attributed to the limited access to pokies.

    This also tells us something important. If pokies are not available, people will typically not substitute them with other harmful forms. It points to the role of the availability of dangerous gambling products in gambling harm, rather than personal characteristics.

    Online gambling has also become a lot more available. Most of us now have a mobile phone almost surgically implanted onto our hand, making online gambling more accessible than ever. Not surprisingly, online gambling continues to increase.

    An obvious solution to try

    Governments have taken increasingly proactive measures to help address gambling harm, such as the National Consumer Protection Framework for Online Gambling, strategies for minimising harm such as NSW’s investment into gambling harm minimisation, Victoria’s proposed reforms on pokies including mandatory precommitment limits, Queensland’s Gambling Harm Minimisation Plan and the ACT’s Strategy for Gambling Harm Prevention.

    Voluntary limits have been trialled to help people keep their gambling under control, but have had virtually no uptake.

    For example, the recent NSW Digital Gaming Wallet trial was conducted in 14 venues. Only 32 people were active users, and 14 of these were deemed genuine users. Another study found only 0.01% of all money put through machines in Victoria used the voluntary YourPlay scheme.

    The problem with voluntary limits is, no one volunteers.

    Mandatory limits though are almost certainly necessary, just like we have mandatory limits for how fast you can drive, or how much you can drink before the bartender puts you in a taxi.

    There will almost certainly be push back against this, just like the introduction of mandatory seatbelts in the 1970s, or the introduction of random breath testing.

    Now, we accept them as important public health measures.

    History tells us the same will happen with mandatory gambling limits, even if we’re a bit uncomfortable about it at first.

    Alex Russell received funding from the Star Entertainment Group from 2014-2016 to conduct research examining gambling behaviour and problems amongst casino staff, and to provide recommendations to minimise risks associated with occupational exposure to gambling. He no longer accepts industry funding, or works on industry-funded projects.

    Matthew Browne receives funding from New Zealand and Australian State and Federal Government Authorities. Most recently, the Queensland Department of Justice and Attorney-General, New Zealand Ministry of Health, and the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation.

    Matthew Rockloff has receives funding from New Zealand and Australian State and Federal Government Authorities. Most recently, the Queensland Department of Justice and Attorney-General, the NSW Office of Responsible Gambling, the New Zealand Ministry of Health, the Victorian Responsible Gambling Foundation, the Government of South Australia, Gambling Research Australia, and the ACT Gambling and Racing Commission.

    – ref. Gambling in Australia: how bad is the problem, who gets harmed most and where may we be heading? – https://theconversation.com/gambling-in-australia-how-bad-is-the-problem-who-gets-harmed-most-and-where-may-we-be-heading-252389

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: On Earth Day, NCDHHS Recognizes the Critical Work of Environmental Health Programs

    Source: US State of North Carolina

    Headline: On Earth Day, NCDHHS Recognizes the Critical Work of Environmental Health Programs

    On Earth Day, NCDHHS Recognizes the Critical Work of Environmental Health Programs
    stonizzo
    Tue, 04/22/2025 – 14:59

    This Earth Day, the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services is recognizing the essential role environmental health plays in protecting and promoting a safe and healthy environment for all North Carolinians. 

    “We know the environment where we live, work and play directly impacts our health and well-being,” said NC Health and Human Services Secretary Dev Sangvai. “Our environmental health and epidemiology teams work every day to protect families from unseen dangers such as contaminated water, excessive heat, foodborne illness and heavy metals in soil.”

    Environmental health plays a vital role in North Carolina communities. For example, approximately 25% of the state’s population depends on private wells for drinking water. Programs like NCDHHS Private Well and Health program help families interpret test results and understand treatment options. The program is also developing a mapping tool to identify areas of increased concern due to arsenic, bacteria, nitrates and other contaminants.

    Many of these programs that help keep North Carolinians safe — from clean drinking water and extreme heat alerts to childhood lead poisoning prevention and food safety — are at risk of going away due to staffing reductions at key federal agencies including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. At least one program has already been paused, and others are in jeopardy due to the loss of federal staff supports.

    Examples of critical environmental health work in North Carolina supported by federal funding:   

    • Extreme heat alert systems and illness tracking program which monitors emergency department visits for heat-related illness and issues local alerts when temperatures reach dangerous levels. In 2024, NCDHHS tracked 4,688 emergency department visits and issued over 1,200 local alerts.
    • Childhood lead exposure prevention,  including inspections and interventions in homes, child-care centers, and from food sources
    • Outbreak response and investigations of foodborne illness outbreaks
    • The Environmental Health Data Dashboard, a widely used tool that provides public access to 120 environmental and health indicators
    • Education and testing that protect families and workers from pesticide and industrial pollution
    • Occupational health monitoring, including exposure to hazards like carbon monoxide and lead
    • Improving safe drinking water through private well testing and treatment projects in Sampson County for families who rely on well water and who may have fewer options to keep their water safe to drink.

    “These programs often operate quietly in the background—but they’re essential to everyday health and safety,” said Dr. Kelly Kimple, Interim State Health Director and NCDHHS Chief Medical Officer. “NCDHHS remains committed to protecting our communities, but continued investment is vital. As North Carolina faces increasing environmental threats from hurricanes to heatwaves, we can’t afford to lose these safeguards.”

    Apr 22, 2025

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: SiriusPoint Announces Date for First Quarter 2025 Earnings Release

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    HAMILTON, Bermuda, April 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — SiriusPoint Ltd. (NYSE: SPNT) (“SiriusPoint” or the “Company”) today announced that it is planning to release its first quarter 2025 financial results after the market close on Monday, May 5, 2025. The Company will also hold a webcast, which can also be accessed as a conference call, to discuss its financial results at 8:30 am (Eastern Time) on Tuesday May 6, 2025.

    The webcast of the live conference call can be accessed by logging onto the Investor Relations section of the Company’s website at www.siriuspt.com. The online replay of the webcast will be available on the Company’s website immediately following the call.

    The conference call can be accessed by dialing 1-877-451-6152 (domestic) or 1-201-389-0879 (international) and asking for the SiriusPoint Ltd. First Quarter 2025 Earnings Call. A replay will be available at the conclusion of the call and can be accessed by dialing 1-844-512-2921, or for international callers 1-412-317-6671, and providing the passcode 13752221. The replay will be available until 11:59 pm (Eastern Time) on May 20, 2025.

    About SiriusPoint

    SiriusPoint is a global underwriter of insurance and reinsurance providing solutions to clients and brokers around the world. Bermuda-headquartered with offices in New York, London, Stockholm and other locations, we are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (SPNT). We have licenses to write Property & Casualty and Accident & Health insurance and reinsurance globally. Our offering and distribution capabilities are strengthened by a portfolio of strategic partnerships with Managing General Agents and Program Administrators within our Insurance & Services segment. With over $2.6 billion total capital, SiriusPoint’s operating companies have a financial strength rating of A- (Excellent) from AM Best, S&P and Fitch, and A3 from Moody’s. For more information, please visit www.siriuspt.com.

    Contacts

    Investor Relations
    Liam Blackledge, SiriusPoint
    liam.blackledge@siriuspt.com
    +44 203 772 3082

    Media
    Sarah Hills, Rein4ce
    sarah.hills@rein4ce.co.uk
    +44 771 888 2011

    The MIL Network –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: HHS, FDA to Phase Out Petroleum-Based Synthetic Dyes in Nation’s Food Supply

    Source: US Department of Health and Human Services – 3

    For Immediate Release:
    April 22, 2025

    The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) today announced a series of new measures to phase out all petroleum-based synthetic dyes from the nation’s food supply—a significant milestone in the administration’s broader initiative to Make America Healthy Again.
    The FDA is taking the following actions:

    Establishing a national standard and timeline for the food industry to transition from petrochemical-based dyes to natural alternatives.
    Initiating the process to revoke authorization for two synthetic food colorings—Citrus Red No. 2 and Orange B—within the coming months.
    Working with industry to eliminate six remaining synthetic dyes—FD&C Green No. 3, FD&C Red No. 40, FD&C Yellow No. 5, FD&C Yellow No. 6, FD&C Blue No. 1, and FD&C Blue No. 2—from the food supply by the end of next year.
    Authorizing four new natural color additives in the coming weeks, while also accelerating the review and approval of others.
    Partnering with the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to conduct comprehensive research on how food additives impact children’s health and development.
    Requesting food companies to remove FD&C Red No. 3 sooner than the 2027-2028 deadline previously required.

    “For too long, some food producers have been feeding Americans petroleum-based chemicals without their knowledge or consent,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. “These poisonous compounds offer no nutritional benefit and pose real, measurable dangers to our children’s health and development. That era is coming to an end. We’re restoring gold-standard science, applying common sense, and beginning to earn back the public’s trust. And we’re doing it by working with industry to get these toxic dyes out of the foods our families eat every day.”
    The FDA is fast-tracking the review of calcium phosphate, Galdieria extract blue, gardenia blue, butterfly pea flower extract, and other natural alternatives to synthetic food dyes. The agency is also taking steps to issue guidance and provide regulatory flexibilities to industries.
    “Today, the FDA is asking food companies to substitute petrochemical dyes with natural ingredients for American children as they already do in Europe and Canada,” said FDA Commissioner Marty Makary, MD, MPH. “We have a new epidemic of childhood diabetes, obesity, depression, and ADHD. Given the growing concerns of doctors and parents about the potential role of petroleum-based food dyes, we should not be taking risks and do everything possible to safeguard the health of our children.”
    In partnership with the NIH Nutrition Regulatory Science and Research Program, the FDA will enhance nutrition and food-related research to better inform regulatory decisions. This collaboration will strengthen the FDA’s ability to develop evidence-based food policies, support a healthier America, and advance the priorities of the Make America Healthy Again Commission.
    ###

    Boilerplate

    The FDA, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nation’s food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, radiation-emitting electronic products, and for regulating tobacco products.

    Inquiries

    Consumer:
    888-INFO-FDA

    Content current as of:
    04/22/2025

    Regulated Product(s)

    Follow FDA

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: 2025-55 HAWAIʻI’S FIRST EVER “DO THE WRITE THING” STUDENT AMBASSADOR CHOSEN TO REPRESENT HAWAIʻI AT NATIONAL SUMMIT IN WASHINGTON D.C.

    Source: US State of Hawaii

    2025-55 HAWAIʻI’S FIRST EVER “DO THE WRITE THING” STUDENT AMBASSADOR CHOSEN TO REPRESENT HAWAIʻI AT NATIONAL SUMMIT IN WASHINGTON D.C.

    Posted on Apr 21, 2025 in Latest Department News, Newsroom

    STATE OF HAWAIʻI

    KA MOKU ʻĀINA O HAWAIʻI

    DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

    KA ʻOIHANA O KA LOIO KUHINA

     

    JOSH GREEN, M.D.
    GOVERNOR

    KE KIAʻĀINA

     

    ANNE LOPEZ

    ATTORNEY GENERAL

    LOIO KUHINA

     

    HAWAIʻI’S FIRST EVER “DO THE WRITE THING” STUDENT AMBASSADOR CHOSEN TO REPRESENT HAWAIʻI AT NATIONAL SUMMIT IN WASHINGTON D.C.

    News Release 2025-55

     

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                                       

    April 21, 2025

    HONOLULU — In a powerful reflection on the realities of youth violence, Waiʻanae Intermediate School eighth grader Keziah Chloe Bacor was selected to represent Hawaiʻi at the National Do the Write Thing (DtWT) Summit for her personal essay titled, “Why Violence?” The piece was written as part of a classroom assignment challenging students to examine how violence has impacted their lives and what they can do to create change. Keziah becomes Hawaiʻi’s first DtWT student ambassador and will travel to Washington, D.C., this July to share her story on a national stage.

    DtWT is a national writing program that empowers middle school students to become changemakers by exploring the root causes and impacts of youth violence. Through classroom discussions and personal reflection, students write essays responding to three key questions: What are the causes of youth violence? How has violence affected your life? What can you do to reduce youth violence?

    “I am thrilled by the overwhelming success of this program as it engages our youth and inspires future generations to speak out against violence and bullying in their homes, schools and communities,” said Governor Josh Green, M.D.. “Their dedication to promoting peace and addressing youth violence also designates them as Hawaiʻi’s Ambassadors for Peace.”

    “Do the Write Thing is an inclusive and equitable program for all middle school students. The writings submitted aren’t judged by grammar or academic skill, but by the power of the ideas and lived experiences they share. This isn’t a writing contest—it’s a platform for young voices, and a powerful movement for change,” said Amber Moyer, DtWT Program Director, Washington, D.C.

    Keziah’s essay will be published with the writings of her peers from across the country. The anthology is archived at the Library of Congress. The students will also meet with members of Congress to share their perspectives and advocate for a future free from violence during a four-day summit.

    “In the beginning of my eight-grade year, many violent acts occurred in our community. Four shootings happened in a span of four weeks. After that, I’ve never been more careful of my surroundings or my family’s,” said Keziah. “Along with this writing challenge, my classmates and I were able to talk to Congresswoman Jill Tokuda and AG Anne Lopez about what was happening in our community, as well as doing sign waving to promote awareness in front of our school. Doing this allowed me to express my feelings about the violence that I have been bottling up inside me. I never thought I would win this competition but I’m forever grateful that I did. I would tell other students let your emotions out. You don’t have to be scared.”

    The Department of the Attorney General and the Hawaiʻi State Department of Education (HIDOE) launched DtWT at the start of the 2024–25 school year, with Waiʻanae Intermediate serving as the pilot site.

    “This year has presented significant challenges for our community. However, this writing initiative has given our students a voice, empowering our students to become active agents of change,” Wai‘anae Intermediate School Principal John Wataoka said. “Through their reflective work, our students showed a deep consideration of the unseen impacts of violence and were afforded a positive outlet for expressing their feelings, one that often sparks a discourse of ideas toward potential solutions.”

     

    “Each year, millions of young lives are shaped by violence, leaving behind deep physical and emotional scars,” Attorney General Anne Lopez said. “I am thankful to the Department of Education and my staff for their hard work implementing DtWT this school year. Together, we are already looking at expanding the program to other schools across the state. We want it to become a tool and platform for our youth to express their thoughts and ideas in writing about addressing youth violence.”

    From the start of the school year, Waiʻanae Intermediate educator Nicole Kurata guided 27 students through meaningful conversations that encouraged empathy, self-reflection, and a commitment to positive change. Students were invited to submit essays or poems of up to three pages for consideration.

    Essays were reviewed by a selection panel that included Attorney General Lopez; Department of Law Enforcement Director Mike Lambert; HIDOE Deputy Superintendent Heidi Armstrong; Nānākuli-Wai‘anae Complex Area Superintendent Disa Hauge; and Ashley Atisanoe of the Waiʻanae Coast Community Mental Health Center.

    For more information on the national Do the Write Thing Program, visit www.dtwt.org/program. Photos, video and soundbites from today’s ceremony at Washington Place can be found here: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/0dmqmrxecpd9524ptej23/AJBQUafFXUVJxq19w1ZoAXc?rlkey=mj44116a1arukenuolxbluqez&st=rxl6jhtf&dl=0

    # # #

     

    Media contacts:

    Nanea Ching

    Communications Director

    Hawai‘i State Department of Education

    Office: 808-784-6200

    Cell: 808-260-5032

    Email: [email protected]

    Dave Day

    Special Assistant to the Attorney General

    Office: 808-586-1284

    Email: [email protected]

    Web: http://ag.hawaii.gov

     

    Toni Schwartz
    Public Information Officer
    Hawai‘i Department of the Attorney General
    Office: 808-586-1252
    Cell: 808-379-9249
    Email: [email protected] 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: Secretary Kennedy Swears in Dr. Oz to Lead CMS

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    We spend more today on health care than any other country in the world, yet we have the worst health outcomes. Chronic disease is rising and we’re not getting our bang for the buck. Dr. Oz as head of CMS is going to change all that. Welcome to the team Dr. Oz. Let’s Make America Healthy Again.” – Secretary Kennedy

    —

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) | http://www.hhs.gov

    http://www.Twitter.com/HHSGov | http://www.Facebook.com/HHS http://www.Instagram.com/HHSGov
    http://www.LinkedIn.com/company/us-department-of-health-and-human-services

    HHS Privacy Policy: http://www.hhs.gov/Privacy.html

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ym2JkIfv17w

    MIL OSI Video –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: HHS/FDA Hold Press Event on Intent to Remove Food Dyes

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Marty Makary will announce the FDA’s intent to phase out the use of petroleum-based synthetic dyes in the nation’s food supply – marking a major step forward in the Administration’s efforts to Make America Healthy Again.
    —

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) | http://www.hhs.gov

    http://www.Twitter.com/HHSGov | http://www.Facebook.com/HHS http://www.Instagram.com/HHSGov
    http://www.LinkedIn.com/company/us-department-of-health-and-human-services

    HHS Privacy Policy: http://www.hhs.gov/Privacy.html

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvXSzDyb4CY

    MIL OSI Video –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Polis Signs Bipartisan Bill Protecting Animals by Promoting Adoption In Colorado

    Source: US State of Colorado

    DENVER – Today, Governor Polis joined by Lt. Governor Primavera, and bill sponsors, signed SB25-085 – Health-Related Research Test Subjects, sponsored by Senators Cathy Kipp and John Carson and Representatives Manny Rutinel and Amy Paschal. The bill aims to provide an avenue for adoption of a dog or cat from a health-related research facility.

    “From now on, dogs and cats that are subjects to scientific research in Colorado, will be valued for their service and given the opportunity to find a forever home. I thank the sponsors for their work on this bill and am happy to sign it into law today,” said Governor Polis.

    “This legislation reflects who we are in Colorado — a state that values science and innovation, but also leads with empathy,” said Lt. Governor Dianne Primavera. “These animals play an important role in advancing medical breakthroughs, and they deserve another chapter of life when their work is done.”

    ###
     

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Security: Walgreens Agrees to Pay up to $350 Million for Illegally Filling Unlawful Opioid Prescriptions and for Submitting False Claims to the Federal Government

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime Alerts (b)

    WASHINGTON – The Justice Department, together with the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), today announced a $300 million settlement with Walgreens Boots Alliance, Walgreen Co. and various subsidiaries (collectively, Walgreens) to resolve allegations that the national chain pharmacy illegally filled millions of invalid prescriptions for opioids and other controlled substances in violation of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and then sought payment for many of those invalid prescriptions by Medicare and other federal healthcare programs in violation of the False Claims Act (FCA). The settlement amount is based on Walgreens’s ability to pay. Walgreens will owe the United States an additional $50 million if the company is sold, merged, or transferred prior to fiscal year 2032. 

    The government’s complaint, filed on Jan. 16 and amended April 18 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleges that from approximately August 2012 through March 1, 2023, Walgreens, one of the nation’s largest pharmacy chains, knowingly filled millions of unlawful controlled substance prescriptions. These unlawful prescriptions included prescriptions for excessive quantities of opioids, opioid prescriptions filled significantly early, and prescriptions for the especially dangerous and abused combination of three drugs known as a “trinity.” Walgreens pharmacists allegedly filled these prescriptions despite clear “red flags” indicating a high likelihood that the prescriptions were invalid because they lacked a legitimate medical purpose or were not issued in the usual course of professional practice. 

    The complaint further alleges that Walgreens pressured its pharmacists to fill prescriptions quickly and without taking the time needed to confirm that each prescription was lawful. Walgreens’s compliance officials also allegedly ignored substantial evidence that its stores were dispensing unlawful prescriptions and even intentionally deprived its own pharmacists of crucial information, including by refusing to share internal data regarding prescribers with pharmacists and preventing pharmacists from warning one another about certain problematic prescribers.

    In light of Friday’s settlement, the United States has moved to dismiss its complaint. Walgreens will also move to dismiss a related declaratory judgment action filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.

    “Pharmacies have a legal responsibility to prescribe controlled substances in a safe and professional manner, not dispense dangerous drugs just for profit,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi.  “This Department of Justice is committed to ending the opioid crisis and holding bad actors accountable for their failure to protect patients from addiction.”

    “This settlement holds Walgreens accountable for failing to comply with its critical responsibility to prevent the diversion of opioids and other controlled substances,” said John J. Durham, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York.  “The settlement also underscores our Office’s continued commitment to ensure that all persons and businesses that fill controlled-substance prescriptions adhere to the requirements of the Controlled Substances Act that are designed to prevent highly addictive medications from being used for illegitimate purposes.”   

    “This settlement resolves allegations that, for years, Walgreens failed to meet its obligations when dispensing dangerous opioids and other drugs,” said Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Granston of the Justice Department’s Civil Division. “We will continue to hold accountable those entities and individuals whose actions contributed to the opioid crisis, whether through illegal prescribing, marketing, dispensing, or distributing activities.”

    In addition to the monetary payments announced today, Walgreens has entered into agreements with DEA and HHS-OIG to address its future obligations in dispensing controlled substances. Walgreens and DEA entered into a Memorandum of Agreement that requires the company to implement and maintain certain compliance measures for the next seven years. Walgreens must maintain policies and procedures requiring pharmacists to confirm the validity of controlled substance prescriptions prior to dispensing controlled substances, provide annual training to pharmacy employees regarding their legal obligations relating to controlled substances, verify that pharmacy staffing is sufficient to enable pharmacy employees to comply with those legal obligations, and maintain a system for blocking prescriptions from prescribers whom Walgreens becomes aware are writing illegitimate controlled substance prescriptions. Walgreens has also entered into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG, which further requires Walgreens to establish and maintain a compliance program that includes written policies and procedures, training, board oversight, and periodic reporting to HHS-OIG related to Walgreens’s dispensing of controlled substances. 

    The civil settlement resolves four cases brought under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the FCA by former Walgreens employees. The FCA authorizes whistleblowers to sue on behalf of the United States and receive a share of any recovery.  It also permits the United States to intervene and take over such lawsuits, as it did here. The relators will receive a 17.25% share of the government’s FCA recovery in this matter.

    The claims asserted against defendants are allegations only and there has been no determination of liability.

    The United States’ pursuit of this matter underscores the government’s commitment to combating health care fraud. One of the most powerful tools in this effort is the False Claims Act.  Tips and complaints from all sources about potential fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement can be reported to HHS, at 800-HHS-TIPS (800-447-8477).

    The United States is represented in this matter by attorneys from the Justice Department’s Civil Division Consumer Protection Branch (Assistant Director Amy DeLine and Trial Attorney Nicole Frazer) and Commercial Litigation Branch, Fraud Section (Assistant Director Natalie Waites and Trial Attorney Joshua Barron), as well as from the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the Northern District of Illinois (Assistant U.S. Attorney Valerie R. Raedy), Middle District of Florida (Chief of the Civil Division Randy Harwell and Assistant U.S. Attorney Carolyn Tapie), District of Maryland (Chief of the Civil Division Thomas Corcoran), Eastern District of New York (Assistant U.S. Attorney Elliot M. Schachner) and Eastern District of Virginia (Assistant U.S. Attorney John Beerbower). Fraud Section senior financial analyst Karen Sharp provided support for the matter.

    The DEA, HHS-OIG, Defense Criminal Investigative Service, Defense Health Agency (DHA), Office of Personnel Management (OPM), Department of Labor (DOL) Office of Inspector General, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), Office of Inspector General, FBI Chicago Field Office, and the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices for the District of Colorado, Southern District of California, Eastern District of California, Northern District of California, Eastern District of Washington, Southern District of Alabama, Southern District of Illinois, Central District of Illinois, District of Arizona, Western District of Texas, Northern District of Texas, District of Puerto Rico, and Eastern District of Louisiana provided substantial assistance in the investigation.

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: Pope Francis, Mother Earth Day & other topics – Daily Press Briefing (22 April 2025)

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Noon Briefing by Stéphane Dujarric, Spokesperson for the Secretary-General.

    Highlights:
    Pope Francis
    Mother Earth Day
    Senior Personnel Appointment
    Occupied Palestinian Territory
    Haiti
    Colombia
    Bolivia
    Ukraine
    Good Defeats Evil

    POPE
    The Secretary-General intends to travel to Rome to attend the funeral of Pope Francis. When we have more details we will share them.

    MOTHER EARTH DAY
    Today is International Mother Earth Day. In his message, the Secretary-General said Mother Earth is running a fever with last year being the hottest ever on record.
    We know what’s causing this sickness, he said, referring to the greenhouse gas emissions humanity is pumping into the atmosphere, but we also know the cure. All countries must create new climate action plans that align with limiting global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius – it is essential to avoid the worst of climate catastrophe, he said.
    And as a reminder, tomorrow the Secretary-General, together with President Lula of Brazil, will convene a group of Heads of State and Government for a virtual closed-door meeting to discuss strengthening global efforts to tackle the climate crisis and accelerate a just energy transition. The Secretary-General is expected to deliver some remarks on climate to you at the Security Council stakeout after the meeting. We’ll share more details as we have them.
    And what better way to celebrate Mother Earth Day than with a fashion show. We are unveiling a new tour guide uniform collection this evening at 6:15 p.m. during a fashion show in the Sputnik area of the Visitor’s Lobby. This is a collaboration between the Government of Sweden, the UN Office for Partnerships, the UN Department of Global Communications, and students from the Swedish School of Textiles at the University of Borås. This partnership reflects a shared commitment to sustainable lifestyle, fashion and innovation. Designed with natural fibers, renewable materials, and low-impact production methods, the uniforms embody a fusion of creativity, inclusivity, and environmental responsibility. We look forward to seeing our tour guides in their new uniforms, they have the toughest job in the building.

    SENIOR PERSONNEL APPOINTMENT
    The Secretary-General is appointing of Ian Martin of the United Kingdom as Head of the Strategic Assessment, as part of his UN80 initiative, of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, that you all know as UNRWA.
    The Secretary-General is tasking Mr. Martin with conducting the Strategic Assessment in order to review UNRWA’s impact; implementation of its mandate under present political, financial, security and other constraints; and, consequences and risks for Palestine Refugees.
    As you all know, Ian Martin has had a distinguished service within the United Nations. He was involved in a number of strategic reviews, most recently as the Lead of the Independent Strategic Review of the UN Mission in Somalia and before then as a member of the
    High-Level Independent Panel on Peace Operations. We will share that announcement with you.

    OCCUPIED PALESTINIAN TERRITORY
    Meanwhile on the ground in Gaza, the situation continues to worsen. Our humanitarian colleagues report that hostilities across the Gaza Strip are continuing, with a devastating toll on civilians and critical infrastructure. Earlier today, local authorities reported attacks by Israeli forces that struck several heavy machinery vehicles across Gaza, halting solid waste and rubble removal services.
    Despite the ongoing hostilities and despite the fact that aid has not come in for more than 50 days, we and our partners are doing what we can to support people throughout the Strip. In Gaza City yesterday, the acting Humanitarian Coordinator for the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Suzanna Tkalec, led a mission to Al Shifa Hospital, where she and partners viewed work underway to install a desalination plant to serve dialysis patients at the facility.
    Our partners also report that several people suffering from severe acute malnutrition have been admitted to hospitals for treatment this week, with cases on the rise.
    Despite extremely low supplies, some 180 community kitchens in Gaza continue to operate every day. However, many of these kitchens are at imminent risk of shutting down since stocks are being depleted. Because of lack of cooking gas, families are resorting to burning plastic to cook their meals.

    Full highlights: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/noon-briefing-highlight?date%5Bvalue%5D%5Bdate%5D=22%20April%202025

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el5ekOhkhYk

    MIL OSI Video –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Congressman Sorensen Helps Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Support Local Law Enforcement Across the Country

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congressman Eric Sorensen (IL-17)

    The Bipartisan Bill Supports Small to Midsize Police Departments by Providing Resources to Improve Officer Recruitment, Retention, Mental Health, and Training

    Congressman Eric Sorensen (IL-17) helped introduce the bipartisan Invest to Protect to support small and midsize police departments with increased federal funding to recruit, train, and retain law enforcement officers. 

    “We need to make sure our law enforcement officers who put their lives on the line to serve our communities have the support they need to do their jobs,” said Congressman Sorensen. “This bipartisan legislation will give local police departments across the country a significant boost in funding to recruit, train, and retain officers during a time when many departments are struggling to fill their ranks.” 

    “At a time when law enforcement needs critical funding, the Invest to Protect Act will undeniably help departments across not only Illinois but our entire country bridge budgetary shortfalls in critical areas such as recruitment and training,” said Rock Island County Sheriff Darren Hart. “I applaud Congressman Sorensen for his continued efforts in the support our men and women in uniform.” 

    Congressman Sorensen has met with local police officers throughout Illinois’ 17th district and understands that too many departments are often working on strained budgets and lack the necessary equipment needed to adequately protect our neighborhoods. Just last year, he helped secure $200,000 for local police in Winnebago County to improve mental health and wellness services. He also announced $750,000 in federal funding to help the Town of Normal hire six law enforcement officers to increase community policing and crime prevention efforts. 

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – New EU bulk order for 146 million doses of Moderna COVID-19 vaccine – E-000608/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    1. The list of participating countries is available in the contract award notice that was published on 24 January 2025[1]. The framework contract was signed by the Commission on behalf of the participating countries.

    2. As the Commission pointed out in its reply to Written Question P-000356/2024[2], the framework contract signed with Moderna in January 2025 is fully flexible and does not bind the contracting authorities to make any purchase. Indeed, the volume of 146 million doses is the maximum ceiling that contracting authorities could purchase if they would have a need during the whole duration of the framework contract. In order to establish the ceiling, the Commission has consulted the contracting authorities prior to launching the call for tender and asked them about their estimated possible needs in case of crisis.

    3. The Spikevax (Moderna COVID-19 vaccine) received a marketing authorisation based on a thorough review by the European Medicine Agency (EMA), of clinical evidence confirming a favourable benefit-risk profile[3]. The vaccine was initially assessed in around 30 000 adults and over 3 000 children[4]. Adapted versions targeting emerging variants, like JN.1, are also approved based on data showing their ability to induce an immune response that can predict clinical efficacy and safety[5]. EMA monitors EudraVigilance data[6] from millions of vaccinated people, reviewing safety information from clinical studies, medical literature and periodic safety update reports to identify and investigate safety signals.

    • [1] https://ted.europa.eu/en/notice/-/detail/51540-2025
    • [2] https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/P-9-2024-000356-ASW_EN.html
    • [3] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/spikevax-previously-covid-19-vaccine-moderna-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf
    • [4] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/spikevax
    • [5] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39591137/
    • [6] https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/research-development/pharmacovigilance/eudravigilance
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Outbreak of a mysterious infectious disease in the Democratic Republic of the Congo – E-002832/2024(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) have been monitoring the disease outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) via epidemic intelligence and regular contacts with the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the African CDC (Af-CDC).

    The Health Security Committee held an ad-hoc meeting on the topic on 12 December 2024[1]. The WHO Regional Office for Africa provided an overview of the epidemiological situation and informed on mortality, severity, and etiological agents. The ECDC explained that the risk posed to EU/European Economic Area countries is low.

    On 27 December 2024, the WHO informed that the undiagnosed disease reported in the DRC’s Kwango province is due to the combination of malaria and common respiratory infections in groups facing food insecurity[2].

    The Af-CDC receives support via the EU4Health and the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument — Global Europe (NDICI-GE)[3] Programmes to strengthen its prevention, preparedness and response capacities (PPRC) for emerging epidemics.

    The Commission works to strengthen third countries’ health systems, including in the DRC, to support their PPRC through Global, regional and bilateral programmes[4].

    The Commission acts against serious cross-border threats to health (SCBTH) with a variety of tools and mechanisms defined in Regulations 851/2004[5], 2022/2371[6] and 2022/2372[7] and Decision No 1313/2013/EU[8].

    It is developing a Union PPR plan to promote a coordinated response to SCBTH. It will consider provisions on joint arrangements for governance, capacities and resources, and cross-border interregional preparedness elements[9].

    • [1] https://health.ec.europa.eu/document/download/5c977252-7aa8-4219-a57b-b853bb2531d1_en?filename=security_20241212_sr_en.pdf
    • [2] As published in WHO’s Disease Outbreak News Item https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2024-DON547
    • [3] https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/funding-technical-assistance/neighbourhood-development-and-international-cooperation-instrument-global-europe-ndici-global-europe_en
    • [4] E.g.: the Pandemic Fund, Global Fund, Gavi Alliance, etc.
    • [5] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02004R0851-20221226
    • [6] http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2371/oj
    • [7] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L:2022:314:FULL&from=EN
    • [8] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02013D1313-20231218
    • [9] As included in Regulation (EU) 2022/2371 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 November 2022 on serious cross-border threats to health and repealing Decision No 1082/2013/EU http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/2371/oj
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    April 23, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Bloody Sunday: massacres in Ukraine and Gaza – P-001544/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-001544/2025
    to the Council
    Rule 144
    Cecilia Strada (S&D), Camilla Laureti (S&D), Annalisa Corrado (S&D), Sandro Ruotolo (S&D), Giuseppe Lupo (S&D), Marco Tarquinio (S&D), Alessandra Moretti (S&D), Pierfrancesco Maran (S&D)

    On Palm Sunday (13 April 2025), around 30 people, including children, were killed and more than 100 injured by a despicable Russian missile strike that used cluster munitions, which have rightly been condemned as contrary to any fundamental human principle.

    On the same day, having given an evacuation order just twenty minutes before the attack, Israel bombed the Christian Al-Ahli Hospital, putting the last functional medical facility in Gaza City out of use and also killing three people, including a child.

    Both massacres show complete disregard for the principles of international humanitarian law and are part of a series of violations of human rights and human dignity which should constitute a line in the sand for EU action on the international stage, as established in Article 21 TEU, the consistency of which is a prerogative of the Council, among others.

    In the light of these atrocities:

    • 1.Will the Council condemn the use of cluster munitions and any attempt to justify their production, use and deployment as a military deterrent?
    • 2.Will it block the proposal for a decision on the position to be taken on behalf of the EU in the EU-Israel Association Council on the extension of the EU-Israel Action Plan for a further two years?

    Supporters[1]

    Submitted: 15.4.2025

    • [1] This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Dario Nardella (S&D), Brando Benifei (S&D), Alessandro Zan (S&D)
    Last updated: 22 April 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News –

    April 23, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 279 280 281 282 283 … 608
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress