Category: housing

  • MIL-OSI: Nine in ten public sector organizations to focus on agentic AI in the next 2-3 years, but data readiness is still a challenge

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Press contact: 
    Antara Nandy
    Tel.: +91 9674515119  
    Email: antara.nandy@capgemini.com

    Nine in ten public sector organizations to focus on agentic AI in the next 2-3 years, but data readiness is still a challenge

    • Public sector organizations recognize the potential of AI for enhancing decision making, improving service delivery and driving operational efficiency, with two-thirds (64%) already exploring or actively working on Gen AI initiatives
    • Challenges with data readiness remain, with only 21% of public sector organizations saying they have the requisite data to train and fine-tune AI models

    Paris, May 20, 2025 – The new Capgemini Research Institute report published today, Data foundations for government – From AI ambition to execution,’ finds that two thirds of public sector organizations are already exploring or actively using generative AI (Gen AI) initiatives to aid the provision of public services. Public sector organizations are also preparing to embrace agentic AI, with 90% planning to explore, pilot, or implement the technology within the next 2-3 years. However, these organizations lag in crucial data readiness, hindering their ability to leverage the full potential of AI. Currently, they face significant challenges with trust, compliance, data management and data sharing.

    With governments seeking to boost efficiency, improve public services, and address complex societal challenges, public sector organizations have high expectations for AI. According to the new report, within the next 2-3 years, 39% of public sector organizations aim to evaluate the feasibility of agentic AI, 45% intend to explore pilot programs, and 6% plan to scale their existing agentic AI initiatives. Attitudes towards agentic AI adoption are mostly consistent across segments, levels of government, and organizational sizes. The report finds that nearly two-thirds (64%) of organizations have progressed to pilots and scaled deployments, or are exploring Gen AI, with this number rising to 82% in defense agencies, 75% in healthcare, and 70% in security.

    “With rising citizen demands and stretched resources, public sector organizations recognize the ways in which AI can help them do more with less. However, the ability to deploy Gen AI and agentic AI depends on having rock-solid data foundations,” said Marc Reinhardt, Public Sector Global Industry Leader at Capgemini. “Looking ahead, governments can be more agile and effective as AI augments the work of government employees to source information, conduct policy analysis, make decisions, and answer citizen queries. However, to reach this future, governments need to focus on building the right data infrastructure and governance frameworks.”

    Organizations struggle with AI adoption due to data and trust issues
    Despite ambitions to embrace and scale AI use, public sector executives cite data security issues (79%) and limited trust in AI-generated outputs (74%) as primary barriers to widespread adoption. In the EU, organizations report a significant gap in confidence when it comes to complying with the EU AI Act1, with less than four in ten (36%) prepared to meet these requirements.

    To progress their Gen AI adoption, public sector organizations require better data mastery, with the public sector showing limited progress in key areas of data management and utilization since 2020. The report finds that only 12% of organizations consider themselves very mature in activating data, while 7% report being very mature in nurturing data and AI-related skills. Only a fifth (21%) of public sector organizations surveyed have the required data to train and fine-tune AI models, including Gen AI models.

    Data sharing concerns and the rise of the Chief Data Officer
    Data sharing is vital for AI adoption as it boosts the volume and diversity of data to enhance AI model performance and optimize decision making. But data sharing initiatives are further complicated by concerns about data, cloud, and AI sovereignty. Despite all public sector organizations surveyed either having or planning to have data sharing initiatives, they are not yet mature; most organizations (65%) worldwide are still in the planning or pilot stages.

    Governments are increasingly recognizing the critical role of harnessing data in the public sector, and this is reflected in the growing prominence of Chief Data Officers (CDO) and Chief AI Officers (CAIO). As many as 64% of public sector organizations already have a CDO, while 24% plan to appoint one, showing a willingness to invest in dedicated leadership for data-driven governance. Furthermore, the increasing strategic value of AI has resulted in over a quarter (27%) of public sector organizations appointing a Chief AI Officer, over a quarter (27%) already having one and 41% planning to introduce this new C-level role.

    Report Methodology
    In December 2024 and January 2025, the Capgemini Research Institute conducted a survey of executives from 350 public sector organizations with two respondents from each organization – one from the IT/data function and one from a line of business (LOB). These executives represented organizations across six public sector segments: public administration, tax and customs, welfare, defense, security, and healthcare. They operated at various levels of government, including national, state, local, and international, and were located in countries across North America, Europe, APAC, and the Middle East.

    About Capgemini
    Capgemini is a global business and technology transformation partner, helping organizations to accelerate their dual transition to a digital and sustainable world, while creating tangible impact for enterprises and society. It is a responsible and diverse group of 340,000 team members in more than 50 countries. With its strong over 55-year heritage, Capgemini is trusted by its clients to unlock the value of technology to address the entire breadth of their business needs. It delivers end-to-end services and solutions leveraging strengths from strategy and design to engineering, all fueled by its market leading capabilities in AI, generative AI, cloud and data, combined with its deep industry expertise and partner ecosystem. The Group reported 2024 global revenues of €22.1 billion.

    Get The Future You Want | www.capgemini.com

    About the Capgemini Research Institute
    The Capgemini Research Institute is Capgemini’s in-house think-tank on all things digital. The Institute publishes research on the impact of digital technologies on large traditional businesses. The team draws on the worldwide network of Capgemini experts and works closely with academic and technology partners. The Institute has dedicated research centers in India, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States. It was ranked #1 in the world for the quality of its research by independent analysts for six consecutive times – an industry first.

    Visit us at https://www.capgemini.com/researchinstitute/


    1AI Act | Shaping Europe’s digital future

    Attachments

    The MIL Network

  • MIL-OSI: Municipality Finance issues a USD 100 million tap under its MTN programme

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Municipality Finance Plc
    Stock exchange release
    20 May 2025 at 10:00 am (EEST)

    Municipality Finance issues a USD 100 million tap under its MTN programme

    On 21 May 2025 Municipality Finance Plc issues a new tranche in an amount of USD 100 million to an existing benchmark issued on 22 January 2025. With the new tranche, the aggregate nominal amount of the benchmark is USD 500 million. The maturity date of the benchmark is 2 February 2029. The benchmark bears interest at a floating rate equal to Compounded SOFR plus 100 bps per annum.

    The new tranche is issued under MuniFin’s EUR 50 billion programme for the issuance of debt instruments. The offering circular, the supplemental offering circular and the final terms of the benchmark are available in English on the company’s website at https://www.kuntarahoitus.fi/en/for-investors.

    MuniFin has applied for the benchmark to be admitted to trading on the Helsinki Stock Exchange maintained by Nasdaq Helsinki. The public trading is expected to commence on 21 May 2025. The existing notes in the series are admitted to trading on the Helsinki Stock Exchange.

    Bank of Montreal Europe PLC act as the Dealer for the issue of the new tranche.

    MUNICIPALITY FINANCE PLC

    Further information:

    Joakim Holmström
    Executive Vice President, Capital Markets and Sustainability
    tel. +358 50 444 3638

    MuniFin (Municipality Finance Plc) is one of Finland’s largest credit institutions. The owners of the company include Finnish municipalities, the public sector pension fund Keva and the State of Finland. The Group’s balance sheet is over EUR 53 billion.

    MuniFin’s customers include municipalities, joint municipal authorities, wellbeing services counties, joint county authorities, corporate entities under the control of the above-mentioned organisations, and affordable social housing. Lending is used for environmentally and socially responsible investment targets such as public transportation, sustainable buildings, hospitals and healthcare centres, schools and day care centres, and homes for people with special needs.

    MuniFin’s customers are domestic, but the company operates in a completely global business environment. The company is an active Finnish bond issuer in international capital markets and the first Finnish green and social bond issuer. The funding is exclusively guaranteed by the Municipal Guarantee Board.

    Read more: www.munifin.fi

    Important Information

    The information contained herein is not for release, publication or distribution, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, in or into any such country or jurisdiction or otherwise in such circumstances in which the release, publication or distribution would be unlawful. The information contained herein does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy, nor shall there be any sale of, any securities or other financial instruments in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration, exemption from registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction.

    This communication does not constitute an offer of securities for sale in the United States. The notes have not been and will not be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) or under the applicable securities laws of any state of the United States and may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, within the United States or to, or for the account or benefit of, U.S. persons except pursuant to an applicable exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the registration requirements of the Securities Act.

    The MIL Network

  • Tamil Nadu: Three dead after wall collapses amid heavy rain in Madurai

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Three people, including two women and a 10-year-old boy, died after a wall collapsed during heavy rain in Valaiyangulam village near Thirupparankundram in Madurai district on Monday evening, officials said.

    According to Madurai District Superintendent of Police Arvind, the deceased have been identified as Ammappillai (65), her grandson Veeramani (10), and their neighbour Vengatti (55).

    The incident occurred around 7 p.m. on Muthalamman Kovil Street, where the victims were sitting near the entrance of Ammappillai’s house amid a power outage that began around 6 p.m. While it was raining, a portion of the house wall suddenly collapsed on them.

    All three sustained severe injuries. Neighbours immediately alerted the 108 ambulance service, and the injured were taken to the Valaiyangulam Government Hospital for first aid.

    Despite medical efforts, Vengatti succumbed to her injuries at the hospital. Ammappillai and Veeramani were referred to the Government Rajaji Hospital in Madurai for further treatment, where they also died.

    Following a complaint, the Perungudi police registered a case and have launched an investigation into the incident.

    Further details are awaited as the probe continues.

    (ANI)

  • MIL-Evening Report: Israel slammed over ‘cynical’ sidestep of global rulings on Gazan humanitarian aid

    Asia Pacific Report

    Israel has been accused of “manipulation” and “cynical” circumvention of global decisions calling for unrestricted humanitarian aid access to the besieged Gaza enclave.

    “In a clear act of defiance against international humanitarian obligations, the occupying state has permitted only nine aid trucks to enter the Gaza Strip — covering both the devastated north and south,” said Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa (PSNA) co-chair Maher Nazzal.

    “This paltry number of trucks represents a deliberate and cynical attempt to circumvent global decisions calling for unrestricted humanitarian access,” he said in a statement as Britain, France and Canada threatened Israel with sanctions and 22 other countries — including New Zealand — jointly condemned Israel over its siege.

    “Under the guise of permitting aid, this token gesture is being used to claim compliance while continuing to suffocate more than two million Palestinians trapped under siege.

    “It is a tactic designed to deflect international criticism and ease diplomatic pressure without meaningfully alleviating the catastrophic conditions faced by civilians.

    “This is not aid — it is manipulation.”

    Nazzal said the humanitarian crisis in Gaza demanded immediate, full, and unhindered access to food, water, medical supplies, and shelter for all areas of the Strip.

    “The international community must see through these performative measures and act decisively,” he said.

    “We call on governments, humanitarian agencies, and civil society around the world to intensify public and political pressure on the occupying state.

    “It is imperative that world leaders hold it accountable for its ongoing violations and demand an end to the blockade, the siege, and these deceptive, life-threatening tactics.”

    Every minute of delay cost lives, Nazzal said.

    “Nine trucks are not enough. Gaza needs justice, not crumbs.”


    UK, France and Canada threaten Israel with sanctions.   Video: Al Jazeera

    Time to expel ambassador
    Letters to the editor in New Zealand newspapers have become increasingly critical of Israel’s war conduct and “atrocities”.

    In one letter headed Time to Act in The New Zealand Herald today, Liz Eastmond said it was time for the government to apply sanctions and expel the Israeli ambassador.

    “The daily average number of those Palestinians killed by Israeli forces in Gaza is 90 plus, and the United Nations states that 70 percent are women and children,” she wrote.

    “After 16 months of brutal onslaught, now including starvation, inside a walled enclave, isn’t it about time our government spoke up regarding this great atrocity of our time? At the very least, by demanding a ceasefire, applying sanctions and expelling the Israeli ambassador?

    “That is the obvious route for a last-ditch attempt to be on ‘the right side of history’.”

    In another letter, headed Standing by Helpless, Allan Bell or Torbay wrote:

    “Countries stand by helpless as the Israelis bomb and shell Palestinians at will in Gaza.

    “Rather than negotiate the peaceful return of the hostages, Israel has cynically used them to justify this slaughter.

    “The use of starvation and destruction amounts to eradication and annihilation.

    “We have protested through the United Nations (an organisation long ignored by the Israelis) to no effect. It’s time to send their ambassador home and close their embassy. A token gesture maybe, but at least we can say we did something.”

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: The Coalition is on a break, but the Nationals risk finding their former partner doesn’t want them back

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Linda Botterill, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University

    In the weeks since the federal election, there’s been much speculation about the future of the Coalition agreement. In their soul-searching, it seemed possible the Liberals might pull the pin, given the degree of their electoral losses and their need to rebuild.

    Instead, the Nationals, the party that has largely benefited from decades in coalition, announced they’d go it alone.

    But it’s more of a Clayton’s break-up than the real thing. As Nationals Leader David Littleproud told the media, “I’m passionate in the belief that we can bring this back together” and the president of the combined LNP in Queensland, Lawrence Springborg, indicated his optimism about a reconciliation.

    So what’s the point of calling it off in the hopes of getting back together by the next election? The Nationals have decided to take a calculated risk to push for what they want, but in doing so, they may have played directly into the Liberals’ hands.

    Why break up?

    When the Nationals (as the Country Party) first appeared in the Commonwealth Parliament more than a century ago, their leader William McWilliams said:

    we intend to support measures of which we approve and hold ourselves absolutely free to criticise or reject proposals with which we do not agree. Having put our hands to the wheel we set the course of our voyage. There has been no collusion; we crave no alliance; we spurn no support; we have no desire to harass the government, nor do we wish to humiliate the opposition.

    Almost immediately, though, the party entered a coalition with a predecessor of the Liberal Party. And the arrangement has suited the agrarian party well.

    Being in coalition, effectively supporting Liberal minority government, gave the Nationals an outsized influence on policy. It also gave them shadow ministries (and increased pay packets as a result), as well as the resulting media attention that comes with being in government.

    But the election saw a shift in the power balance in the Coalition party room. While the Liberals were crushed, the Nationals lost just one lower house seat to a candidate who was one of them before running as an independent.

    At the current count, the Liberals have 18 seats in the House of Representatives, while the Nationals have nine.

    So why would the smaller party leave a coalition arrangement?

    The issue seems to have been largely focused on energy policy, particularly nuclear policy, the party’s brainchild.

    Littleproud also mentioned divestiture laws to combat supermarket power and a $20 billion regional Australia fund as policies on which his party would not compromise. Clearly the Nats felt Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and the Liberals did not provide the appropriate guarantees.

    How does this play out nationally?

    In Queensland, the Liberal and National parties are formally combined as one joint organisation, the Liberal National Party (LNP).

    Under the LNP agreement in the state, federal electorates are divvied up between the parties. Whoever holds the seat of Groome, for instance, has to date taken their seat in the Liberal party room.

    How long these arrangements hold post-split is yet to be seen. It might make life particularly interesting for MPs helping formulate policy in the Liberal party room who might otherwise be more ideologically aligned with the Nats.

    More broadly though, there are ramifications for which candidates can run in each seat.

    Under the federal Coalition agreement, wherever there was an incumbent from either the Liberals or the Nationals, the other coalition partner couldn’t field a candidate to contest the seat. This largely prevented so-called three-cornered contests in which the Liberals and Nationals would split the vote against Labor. It also prevented the coalition partners from seeking to poach each other’s seats.

    But that doesn’t apply if the sitting member retires, and of course it seems unlikely to apply now that there’s no longer a coalition. The Nationals are free to run against the Liberals anywhere in the country and vice versa. This may explain Littleproud’s eagerness to leave a reunion before the next election on the table.

    The Liberals may see this as an opportunity. They already hold a swag of rural seats and when they win a former National Party seat, the Nationals struggle to get the seat back. Ley’s own seat of Farrer, for example, was once held by Nationals Leader Tim Fischer.

    Was it a smart move?

    Breaking up is something of a gamble from the Nationals.

    On the face of it, if the concern was about ensuring nuclear stayed on the agenda, the Nationals have relinquished their political power to keep it there by walking away. There’s little incentive for the Liberals to listen to a party that’s now part of the crossbench.

    There are likely to be two parties sipping champagne today. The first, and most obvious one, is Labor.




    Read more:
    David Littleproud cites nuclear energy disagreement as major factor in Coalition split


    Given the Liberals only have 18 lower house seats, Ley is going to have a hard time assembling an effective shadow cabinet and therefore alternative government. The talent pool, even including the party’s senators, will be spread thinly.

    Ley also spoke in praise of the coalition arrangement, saying the parties were “stronger together”.

    But longer term, there’s also reason for the Liberal Party to be celebrating.

    Much has been made about the need for the Liberals to go back to the drawing board to decide what a modern Liberal party should look like. It will likely be easier to reflect and create sorely-needed transformational change without the more conservative Nationals to consider.

    If Ley wants to rebuild the party to recapture the inner-city seats they’ve lost in the last two elections, this is a golden opportunity.

    And when it comes to forming government, the Nationals are not the Liberals’ only option. It’s possible the Liberals look around at some stage and decide they’d rather make up numbers with the Teals, if that suits them strategically.

    In theory, they could do what other parties around the world do: form a coalition after an election that they have fought on their own policies.

    The Nationals, meanwhile, may look around the parliament and find they don’t have any other friends with which to form government.

    So while both sides of the sort-of break-up have left their doors firmly open to getting back together, the risk the Nationals run is when they decide they want to move back in, their former partner may have moved on.

    Linda Botterill has in the past received funding from the Australian Research Council, the Grains Research and Development Corporation, and Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (now Agrifutures).

    ref. The Coalition is on a break, but the Nationals risk finding their former partner doesn’t want them back – https://theconversation.com/the-coalition-is-on-a-break-but-the-nationals-risk-finding-their-former-partner-doesnt-want-them-back-257117

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: The government wants to contain NDIS growth. But ineligible people with disability also need support

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Helen Dickinson, Professor, Public Service Research, UNSW Sydney

    PeopleImages.com – Yuri A/Shutterstock

    Ensuring the provision of high quality disability services will pose a significant challenge for the Albanese government’s second term.

    The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) cost A$43.9 billion in 2023–24 and is one of the fastest growing pressures on the federal budget.

    As the government seeks to moderate growth of the scheme budget, some NDIS participants are finding they are no longer eligible for the scheme.

    The problem is, the supports they’re supposed to be able to access instead aren’t yet in place – or don’t exist.

    Containing growth

    Concerns have been mounting for some years about the NDIS’s growing budget. In 2024, National Cabinet set a target of moderating annual growth to 8%. If met, the scheme will still grow to $58 billion by 2028.

    The previous government attempted to limit its annual growth through legislative changes and a focus on weeding out fraud.




    Read more:
    The NDIS reform bill has been passed – will it get things ‘back on track’ for people with disability?


    But there have been a number of reports in recent months of the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) reassessing eligibility of NDIS participants to determine whether their supports are most appropriately paid for by the scheme.

    If individuals are unable to provide evidence within 28 days they may lose their funding. This can be a challenge to get if participants need to see a clinical professional to gather evidence.

    One group particularly impacted by eligibility reassessments are children. Some participants report being told they are no longer eligible for NDIS funding and should instead seek supports from other mainstream services such as health or education.

    But all too often, parents find these services don’t fund the necessary supports, leaving them to either fund this themselves or have their child go without.

    If opportunities for early intervention are missed, they may require more intensive and expensive supports in future.

    What are foundational supports?

    The NDIS was never intended to provide services to all people with disability. About 86% of disabled Australians do not have NDIS plans.

    But this doesn’t mean that people with disability who are not on the NDIS don’t also have support needs.

    New research found people with disability who were not NDIS participants had high levels of need for assistance for tasks of daily living including transport, cognitive and emotional tasks, mobility and household chores.

    These supports aren’t usually provided in the health system, but similar supports are provided through aged care.

    The NDIS review argued a lack of accessible and inclusive mainstream services for people with disability meant people were being pushed into the NDIS as their only potential source of support.

    A key recommendation of the NDIS review was states and territories should provide “foundational supports”.

    Foundational supports are split into two categories. General foundational supports includes things such as peer support, improving self-advocacy skills, and information and advice.

    Targeted supports include shopping and cleaning for those not eligible for the NDIS. Supports are aimed at particular groups such as those with psychosocial disability (from a mental disorder), families of children with developmental delay, and transition supports for young people preparing for employment and independent living.

    Foundational supports are supposed to be available from July of this year so people with disability who aren’t eligible for the NDIS can access support without having to join the scheme.

    But people who are reassessed as ineligible for the scheme are having their funding cut before these foundational supports have been established, leaving a worrying gap.




    Read more:
    States agreed to share foundational support costs. So why the backlash against NDIS reforms now?


    There is currently significant confusion in the disability community about what foundational supports will look like and who will be able to access these.

    What is clear is there is significant unmet need for people with disability outside of the scheme and this might lead to a deterioration of functioning among those in this group and potentially burnout of informal carers.

    Getting foundational supports right will be a key point of negotiation between federal and state and territory governments if people with disability are to be supported appropriately and the NDIS is to be sustainable.

    New ministers and ministries

    The new government has moved responsibility for the NDIS from the Department of Social Services into the new Department of Health, Disability and Ageing led by Mark Butler.

    While Butler will sit in Cabinet, Jenny McAllister has been appointed to the outer ministry as Minister for the National Disability Insurance Scheme.

    The shift of the NDIS to this portfolio has raised concerns among the disability community that it might not be a priority in an government department that also deals with health and aged care.

    There are further concerns this move might medicalise how disability is seen. This would go against the human rights basis of the NDIS, where issues of choice and control are crucial.

    The ministerial and departmental restructures do present new opportunities to harmonise services for people with disability.

    Currently health, disability and aged care are competing to attract similar workforces across allied health, aged care and disability support. A cross-sector approach to workforce planning could be streamlined if it is the responsibility of one department.

    Without this, we risk putting more pressure on the NDIS and leaving people with disability not on the NDIS without the supports they need.

    The government’s ministerial and departmental restructure will likely further delay the implementation of foundational supports. Given the breadth of responsibilities of the health, disability and aged care portfolio, other policies – and election promises – might take precedence over work on foundational supports.

    Helen Dickinson receives funding from ARC, NHMRC and Department of Social Services

    Anne Kavanagh receives funding from the ARC, NHMRC, MRFF, MS Australia and the Australian government.

    ref. The government wants to contain NDIS growth. But ineligible people with disability also need support – https://theconversation.com/the-government-wants-to-contain-ndis-growth-but-ineligible-people-with-disability-also-need-support-256236

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Uranium enrichment in Iran is not subject to discussion – MFA

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    TEHRAN, May 20 (Xinhua) — Uranium enrichment in Iran is non-negotiable, Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei said at a weekly press conference on Monday, commenting on the remarks by U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for the Middle East Steven Witkoff.

    “We have one very, very clear red line and that is enrichment, and we cannot allow [Iran] to have even one percent of the enrichment capability,” he said in an interview with the American television channel ABC News on Sunday.

    “We are not asking anyone for permission to enrich uranium on Iranian territory, and the United States is not in a position to give or not give permission to any country with respect to this right provided for in the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT),” said E. Baghaei.

    To claim that any country that wants to enrich uranium has non-peaceful purposes is a “deliberate misconception” aimed at distorting public opinion, he stressed. “There are states that enrich uranium but do not possess nuclear weapons,” the diplomat added.

    After each round of indirect talks with the US, Iran “feels that progress has been made and we at least understand each other’s points of view, but unfortunately, upon arrival in Washington, the American side expresses different positions,” noted E. Baghaei. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • Wall collapse, electrocution kill three in rain-hit Bengaluru

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Three people, including a nine-year-old boy, were killed in rain-related incidents on Monday following heavy rainfall in Bengaluru.

    Shashikala, an employee of a private company, succumbed to injuries after a wet compound wall suddenly collapsed on her in Whitefield on Monday morning. She was walking towards Channasandra when the wall gave way and fell on her, resulting in her death.

    In another incident, two people, including a young boy, died of electrocution in BTM Layout on Monday evening.

    The deceased have been identified as 55-year-old Manohar Kamat and nine-year-old Dinesh, a native of Nepal. According to police, both were electrocuted while attempting to pump rainwater out of an apartment basement using a motor.

    The incident occurred at Madhuvana Apartments located in N.S. Palya, 2nd Stage, BTM Layout. Mico Layout police rushed to the spot and shifted the victims to St. John’s Hospital.

    Bengaluru recorded 132 mm of rainfall on Sunday night. The Meteorological Department has predicted heavy rain for Monday night (May 19) and May 20 as well.

    Several software companies in Bengaluru have advised employees to work from home due to worsening traffic conditions. Authorities remain on high alert as the situation develops.

    (IANS)

  • MIL-OSI Submissions: Australia Banking Sector – CBA announces interest rate reductions

    Source: Commonwealth Bank of Australia

    The Commonwealth Bank has responded to the Reserve Bank of Australia’s cash rate decision.

    Following the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) decision to decrease the official cash rate by 0.25% per annum (p.a.), CBA will decrease home loan variable interest rates by 0.25% p.a.

    All home loan variable rate changes announced today will be effective 30 May 2025.

    CBA’s Group Executive, Retail Banking Services, Angus Sullivan said: “Today’s decision will help to deliver some much-needed additional relief for many Australians with a mortgage.

    “When combined with the February rate cut this change should free up some more cash flow for homeowners who need it. We know many have had tighter budgets in recent months and will welcome that additional flexibility.

    “Today’s announcement of a 0.25% p.a. rate cut will help to deliver a monthly saving of approximately $80 for home loan customers making principal and interest repayments on an average loan size of $500,000. After two rate cuts many home loan customers will start to see a more meaningful change month to month.”

    Following the February rate reduction, around 14 per cent of eligible1 customers reduced their direct debit repayments, with many others choosing to continue paying off their home loan at a slightly faster rate. Mr Sullivan said for those customers who would like to reduce their home loan direct debit following today’s rate cut announcement, they will be able to do so via the CommBank app or NetBank the day after the rate change is effective.  

    “We know homeowners like to manage their finances in line with their individual budgets and they can change their direct debits very simply via our digital channels,” he said.

    Support for home loan customers

    For our home loan customers we have a range of support options available that can help them navigate today’s change. These include:

    • Estimating future home loan repayments via the home loan repayments calculator. You can also estimate the impact additional payments can make to your loan balance and duration.   
    • Changing the repayment amount and frequency of home loan payments. Eligible customers can reduce their mortgage repayments and align their repayment timing to when and how often they are paid via the CommBank app or NetBank.

    A range of money management support and tools are also available in the CommBank app. These include:

    • Spend Tracker in the CommBank app to help categorise your debit and credit card transactions, making it easier to see the impact your spending decisions have on your everyday finances.
    • Category budgets to set weekly, fortnightly or monthly budgets for different categories of your spending – from entertainment to transport, eating out and shopping. You can see how your spending compares to the budget you set yourself, to help you stay on track.

    MIL OSI – Submitted News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Reserve Bank cuts interest rates again

    Source: Australian Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Industry

    Today the independent Reserve Bank of Australia Monetary Policy Board decided to lower the cash rate again for the second time in three months.

    This quarter of a percentage point cut brings the cash rate to 3.85 per cent.

    This is very welcome relief for millions of Australians.

    We are really pleased to see more help for hard working families with a mortgage.

    It reflects the substantial and sustained progress we’ve made together on inflation, and it recognises the uncertain global environment.

    Headline and underlying inflation are now both in the RBA’s target band for the first time in almost four years.

    This is the first time since records began that the unemployment rate has been in the low 4s and headline and underlying inflation are in the RBA’s target band at the same time.

    In its statement today, the RBA Monetary Policy Board points to the very substantial progress we’ve made on inflation and says upside risks to inflation “appear to have diminished”.

    Today’s cut doesn’t mean the job is finished, but it will help.

    When we came to office three years ago this week inflation and interest rates were rising and now they’re falling.

    For a household with a mortgage of $500,000, this rate cut will save them $79 a month, or $948 per year.

    When combined with the cut in February, this household will save $159 a month, or $1,908 per year.

    Under Labor, inflation is down substantially, real wages are up, unemployment is low, our economy is growing, and interest rates are falling.

    Our economic strategy has been about getting on top of inflation without mass job losses or growth going backwards and that’s what we’re seeing in our economy.

    All the progress we have made together engineering this soft landing means we are well‑placed and well‑prepared for what’s next.

    We know we will be faced with more global economic volatility and unpredictability over the next three years, not less.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Health and Politics – Funding primary care nurses the answer to the health crisis – NZNO

    To fix chronic staff shortages stopping New Zealanders seeing their GPs when they’re sick, the Coalition Government must use Budget 2025 to keep nurses in the sector by paying them the same as hospital nurses, the New Zealand Nurses Organisation Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa (NZNO) says.

    NZNO chief executive Paul Goulter says after recent wage rounds come into effect in July, most primary and community care nurse will still earn an average of 10% or $10,129 less a year than their hospital counterparts.

    “There are currently 4884 FTE nurses working in primary and community care. NZNO calculations show that 274 more FTE nurses are needed in the sector to cover the care of the 300,000 New Zealanders who can’t even enrol with a primary health organisation such as a GP clinic.

    “That means Budget 2025 needs to provide $52.3 million to ensure there is a sustainable primary and community health nursing workforce that can care for all New Zealanders. This would help take the pressure off hospital emergency departments which are overwhelmed with people who can’t see their local doctors when they first get sick,” Paul Goulter says.

    If the Coalition Government is serious about fixing the health system, it needs to fix primary and community care.

    “The difference in pay with hospital nurses largely reflects the pay equity settlement Te Whatu Ora nurses received. Following the Coalition Government’s gutting of the pay equity scheme and having to refile the primary and community care claim, this gap is only going to widen.

    “Shovelling three times the amount to overseas owned urgent care franchises which most New Zealanders can’t afford to go to, is not the solution,” Paul Goulter says.

    NZNO Primary Health Care Nurses College chair Tracey Morgan says earning $10,129 a year more would have a considerable impact on primary and community care nurses.

    “Having that additional income would pay the average rent of a home in Hamilton, near where I live, for a third of the year. It could make the difference between a primary and community nurse staying in their role, helping whānau they have watched grow up, rather than leaving for better paid work in hospitals or overseas.

    “We have the same skills and qualifications as hospital nurses. It is only fair that we are paid the same,” Tracey Morgan says.

    Background:

     Research published in the Journal of Primary Health Care has found that New Zealand invests 5.4% of its total health funding in primary care.

    – Other OECD countries allocate an average of 14% of their health spending to primary care.

     Evidence shows that for every $1 spent on primary care, $14 is saved in hospital-based, or secondary health care.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Council’s smart solutions to daily business

    Source: Secondary teachers question rationale for changes to relationship education guidelines

    A long-term plan initiative for Auckland Council to do more with less, is reinventing how the council uses technology and purchases services, while also delivering better customer experiences.

    The product of Auckland Council’s Long-term Plan 2024-2034, Group Shared Services was tasked with improving efficiency in back office services across the council group and enhancing customer experience.

    At May’s Revenue, Expenditure and Value Committee, chair Desley Simpson applauded the division’s focus on smart solutions.

    “We’re seeing technology and services that are smart for the council business at all levels – benefiting our ratepayers, delivering better customer service and building efficiency across the council group,” says Cr Simpson.

    “We have a commitment to look at every decision and make sure we’re negotiating the very best deals by leveraging the scale of council and its CCOs, considering all the options and using the resources we have in-house.”

    Ways we’re doing things differently

    • Renegotiating key contracts – from property to new licenses, an unnecessary spend of nearly $18 million over 10 years has been avoided.

    • Reinventing technology – new GIS aerial imagery will bring in an estimated $32 million to Auckland’s economy. The technology will also make urban planning and infrastructure easier, inform environmental conservation and increase accuracy for legal and planning purposes.

    • Increased sharing of resources – we are providing Port of Auckland with access to group software, which saves about $140,000. Further savings of $130,000 has been secured for a Watercare IT licence.

    • Delivering new tools faster and cheaper in-house, like the Vote Aucklanders website for the upcoming election and flood recovery data analysis saving $150,000.

    Delivering benefits to ratepayers

    Group shared services director Richard Jarrett said the division is striving to deliver measurable benefits to ratepayers, through everyday opportunities.

    “We are looking at every new contract, service update, tool or technology across the council and the council-controlled organisations with a fresh eye,” says Mr Jarrett.

    “In each case, we challenge ourselves on how we can deliver differently and better than before, and we believe it’s adding value for Aucklanders.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-Evening Report: There’s no country more important to Australia than Indonesia. Trouble is, the feeling isn’t mutual

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tim Lindsey, Malcolm Smith Professor of Asian Law and Director of the Centre for Indonesian Law, Islam and Society, The University of Melbourne

    Making Jakarta their first overseas visit has become a set piece for newly elected Australian prime ministers dating back to John Howard in 1996.

    So, we should not be surprised that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese flew to Jakarta soon after his landslide re-election, just as he did in 2022. In fact, it would be very surprising if he did not.

    These visits are now an obligation for a newly elected PM. Failing to jump on the plane would be seen in Indonesia as an intentional snub.

    The visits follow a familiar pattern. The prime minister offers some sort of paraphrase of Paul Keating’s famous tag, “There is no country more important to Australia than Indonesia”. (Albanese actually quoted Keating word for word.)

    There is a carefully planned photo op, such as riding bamboo bikes, visiting a crowded marketplace or, this time around, a golf cart ride at the presidential palace.

    The brief visit ends with a joint press conference, where both leaders pledge to “strengthen the relationship”. With occasional exceptions, their announcements are vague and aspirational. Sometimes they just restate what they’ve said before.

    In other words, these performative post-election prime ministerial visits have become an essential, symbolic part of Australia’s bilateral relationship with Indonesia, but they too often lack substance.

    This is a pity, because Australia needs to work much harder to achieve its key aims with Indonesia, which Albanese defined in Jakarta as closer economic and defence engagement.

    To put it bluntly, Australia struggles to get Indonesia’s attention. It is an uncomfortable truth that, from an Indonesian perspective, Australia’s leverage and importance is limited. Jakarta sees Canberra as the junior partner in the relationship.

    An Indonesian president is hardly likely to say, “There is no country more important to Indonesia than Australia”, let alone make a post-election visit to Canberra a fixture.

    Prabowo’s gesture to Australia

    This is not to say Indonesia’s current president, Prabowo Subianto, is hostile to Australia. He is not.

    In fact, he made a significant friendly gesture to Australia soon after he was sworn in last year by releasing the remaining five members of the Bali Nine from prison in Indonesia and sending them home for Christmas.

    This move was beneficial to Prabowo on multiple fronts.

    First, generous acts of clemency of this kind distinguish him from his predecessor, Joko “Jokowi” Widodo, and his hardline “war on drugs” policy. Jokowi endorsed Prabowo in last year’s election, but Prabowo is keen to emerge from his long shadow.

    Second, Prabowo is far more cosmopolitan and interested in international affairs than his predecessor. He has ambitions to be a player on the global stage, as witnessed by his (failed) efforts to broker a peace between Russia and Ukraine last year. Freeing foreign prisoners makes him more welcome overseas.

    Third, granting clemency helps counter Prabowo’s dark past, and the long-standing and credible allegations of human rights abuses that date back to his time as Soeharto’s son-in-law and a special forces commander.

    These allegations are more of a problem internationally than at home, but they are still a nuisance for Prabowo. He likely expected his Bali Five gesture would win him a warm and image-enhancing response from Albanese – and indeed, that proved to be the case.

    But while all this suited Prabowo nicely, it did not result in any major developments in the two areas most important to Australia: trade and security.

    Lingering mistrust on security matters

    There are understandable reasons for this.

    Take security, for example. Indonesia is critically important to Australia as its northern defensive shield. It is vital to our interests that we have a strong security partnership with Indonesia. But Australia is less important to Indonesia’s own defences.

    We are also not fully trusted. In addition to lingering concerns about the AUKUS deal with the US and UK, Australia’s role in the independence of Timor–Leste in 1999 resulted in Indonesia famously tearing up the sweeping security treaty Keating negotiated with Soeharto in 1995.

    Indeed, the loss of Timor–Leste still rankles with some senior Indonesian military figures. Australia and Indonesia have signed new security arrangements since then – the Lombok Treaty, in particular, and the agreement signed last year enabling more complex training exercises between the two militaries. However, none match the scale of the 1995 agreement.

    Moreover, our engagement on security is complicated by Indonesia’s long-standing commitment to a non-aligned diplomatic policy – what it calls “free and active”.

    Jakarta did stop short of allowing Russia to base long-range aircraft in Papua province, but under its non-aligned stance, it has purchased weapons and fuel from Russia and become the first Southeast Asian country join the BRICS grouping of countries (founded by Brazil, Russia, India and China).

    Undercooked on trade and investment

    As for the economic relationship, our low profile in Indonesian markets – despite our proximity – severely limits our leverage and influence in Indonesia.

    Indonesia has a population approaching 300 million and a huge retail market. But as a trading partner, Australia ranks far behind many other countries, including China, the US, Japan, India, Singapore, and even Malaysia, the Philippines and Vietnam.

    This is despite signing a free trade agreement with Indonesia in 2019. Although it was many years in the making, the deal did not deliver dramatic changes at the time, and has had limited impact ever since.

    Indonesia is open about its hunger for more foreign investment. But, again, we are not a major investor in our near neighbour. In fact, Australia invests more in far-flung tax havens such as Luxembourg and Ireland, as well as in Papua New Guinea, Taiwan and India, than we do in Indonesia. It’s not even in our top 20 investment destinations.

    As Albanese said in Jakarta, strengthening investment ties requires government, business and civil society demonstrating greater engagement and ambition when it comes to Indonesia.

    This is not easy. Australian businesses remain wary of Indonesia because of bureaucratic red tape and the complexity created by decentralised and sometimes chaotic local governments, as well as serious, widespread corruption.

    However, this is true of many other business destinations in Asia and the developing world. It is hard to avoid the impression that Australian businesses have a blind spot regarding Indonesia.

    A move that would get Jakarta’s attention

    The ambition that Albanese called for is well overdue.

    Both China and India have large diasporas in Australia that can offer rich human resources for investors in those countries and help them navigate complex markets. By comparison, the local Indonesian population is tiny, and our education system has failed to fill the gap.

    In fact, Indonesian studies is barely hanging on by its fingernails in our schools and universities. The numbers of students studying Indonesian in Year 12 has plunged to minuscule numbers in recent years. And universities drop courses every year, with enrolments falling 63% between 1992 and 2019.

    A second-term leader with a gigantic majority, Albanese is ideally positioned to do something about this.

    He should take a page from the playbooks of ALP heroes Keating and Kevin Rudd, who funded programs to boost Asian languages in schools. Albanese should allocate serious funding – A$100 million would be good start – over the next decade to revive Indonesian language instruction in Australian schools.

    That would help rebuild what was once a level of Indonesia literacy unmatched anywhere else in the world. It would be a big step towards helping Australian businesses summon up the courage to enter complex Indonesian markets where only around 5% of the population have functional English.

    And it would be an ambitious announcement that would be guaranteed to get serious attention in Jakarta.

    Tim Lindsey receives funding from the Australian Research Council.

    ref. There’s no country more important to Australia than Indonesia. Trouble is, the feeling isn’t mutual – https://theconversation.com/theres-no-country-more-important-to-australia-than-indonesia-trouble-is-the-feeling-isnt-mutual-256900

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-Evening Report: Follow the money: the organisations that spent the most on social media during the election

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Riboldi, Lecturer in Social Impact and Social Change, UTS Business School, University of Technology Sydney

    The Conversation , CC BY

    Social media advertising is an increasingly important frontier in election campaigns.

    Political parties, candidates and third-party groups – such as trade unions, industry bodies and interest groups – all spend big to push their message high into the algorithms of potential voters.




    Read more:
    What did the parties say on TikTok in the election, and how? Here’s the campaign broken down in 5 charts


    In the 2025 Australian federal election, this spend has been estimated at around A$40 million across the Meta- and Google-owned digital media platforms.

    Based on our analysis of data from the Meta Ad Library – part of a broader research project on third sector groups (not political parties or candidates) during the election – third party groups spent more than $7.5 million advertising on Meta platforms Facebook and Instagram from March 28 to May 3 – the date the election was called to polling day.

    Understanding which of these groups spent what, and on what, offers insights into the election results and modern political campaigning generally.

    Some surprises in the stats

    During the election campaign, much media commentary focused on right wing organisation Advance Australia’s digital campaigning.

    However, our analysis shows pro-Liberal/National Party groups were outspent on Meta (which owns Facebook) almost 3:1 by anti-Liberal groups.

    Much of this was focused on workers’ rights, or in opposition to the Coalition’s nuclear energy policy.

    The top 25 spending groups on Meta spent just more than $6 million between them, at a rate of around $6,500 a day. The rate of spending increased steadily during the campaign, with the bulk of the spend (more than $4 million) occurring in the final two weeks.

    On May 2, the day before the election, these 25 big spenders paid on average $16,622 to push their message on Meta social media platforms.

    Conservative campaign group Advance Australia spent just less than $50,000 on Meta on the final day of the campaign (social media advertising is exempt from the two-day ad-blackout laws affecting traditional media operators).

    Advance was the biggest third-party campaigning group on Meta during the election, spending more than $1 million during the campaign’s 37 days.

    Advance’s left-wing competitor during the campaign was the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), which spent around $475,000 on Meta advertising across the campaign, including more than $52,000 on May 2.

    While the ACTU spent less than half of Advance’s spend across Meta during the campaign, it spent three times as much on YouTube/Google advertising. Data from the Google Ad Transparency Center reveals the ACTU spent $928,000 on the platform between March 28 and May 3, whereas Advance spent $296,000 during the same period.

    Key battlegrounds: climate and energy

    The other two big Meta spenders the day before polling day highlight the key policy contest among third party organisations – the Coalition’s proposal to introduce nuclear powered energy to Australia.

    Nuclear for Australia was the biggest spender on Meta on May 2, spending more than $65,000 in one day. Its direct counterpoint, Liberals Against Nuclear, spent a touch more than $32,000 on the same day.

    However, during the whole campaign, Liberals Against Nuclear spent more ($246,000 compared to Nuclear for Australia’s $236,000).

    An anti-nuclear message was particularly prominent across the top 25 spending groups on Meta. Of the 15 organisations we identified as being explicitly anti-Liberal, nine were climate organisations with an anti-nuclear message.

    These nine organisations spent a total of $2.5 million across Meta during the course of the campaign.

    The most significant of these was Climate 200, which spent almost $900,000 on Meta during the election campaign.

    Another key anti-nuclear nuclear campaigner on Meta was Climate Action Network Australia (CANA), which spent almost $400,000 between March 28 and May 3 across two different Facebook pages, and Hothouse Magazine, which spent almost $300,000 on pro-renewables advertising.

    Together, the 15 explicitly anti-Liberal groups spent more than $3.6 million during the election, far eclipsing the two clear pro-Liberal groups, Advance Australia and Nuclear for Australia, which spent around $1.3 million between them.

    So, what insights might these findings offer into the election results?

    What may the future hold?

    There certainly appears to be a correlation between the historic low Coalition vote and the outspending of pro-Liberal entities on Meta.




    Read more:
    Political parties can recover after a devastating election loss. But the Liberals will need to think differently


    Outside of Advance and Nuclear for Australia’s Meta campaigning, big-spending right-wing groups such as Australians for Prosperity, Better Australia and Australian Taxpayer’s Alliance seemed more singularly focused on tearing down the Greens and Climate 200-backed independents than on helping the Coalition win government.

    In contrast, the anti-Dutton and anti-nuclear focus of the anti-Liberal third party spending has a degree of collective discipline about it, which is probably indicative of the strength of the workers’ rights and climate movements in Australia.

    Additionally, the climate movement’s strong anti-nuclear campaign may have presented a message which glossed over Labor’s climate failures during the previous term.

    This may have sent some pro-climate voters to Labor rather than to the Greens or Climate 200 independents. For their part, these organisations appeared to campaign more around the opportunities of a possible minority government than on environmental issues.

    Civil society actors such as trade unions and industry groups have a long history of involvement in Australian politics.

    The increasing non-major party vote, now around a third of all voters, means there are now more voices in our democratic processes.

    This in turn creates more opportunities for third party organisations to influence policy debate and election outcomes.

    Mark Riboldi does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Follow the money: the organisations that spent the most on social media during the election – https://theconversation.com/follow-the-money-the-organisations-that-spent-the-most-on-social-media-during-the-election-256784

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • One Year of Lai: Taiwan Balances Courage with Composure

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Taiwan wants peace and dialogue with China, as war has no winners, but the government must continue to strengthen the island’s defences, President Lai Ching-te said on Tuesday as he marked one year in office.

    China calls Lai a “separatist” and has rebuffed his repeated offers for talks. Lai rejects Beijing’s sovereignty claims over the democratic and separately governed island, saying only Taiwan’s people can decide their future.

    A government spokesperson said last week that Taiwan could not rule out the possibility that China would mark the anniversary with military drills.

    Speaking to reporters at the Presidential Office in central Taipei, Lai said the Taiwanese people loved peace.

    “I, too, am committed to peace, because peace is priceless and war has no winners. But when it comes to seeking peace, we can harbour neither dreams nor illusions,” he said.

    Taiwan will continue to strengthen its defences, as preparing for war is the best way to avoid it, Lai added.

    “I also reiterate here – Taiwan is happy to have exchanges and cooperation with China as long as there is reciprocal dignity. Using exchanges to replace hemming in, dialogue to replace confrontation.”

    China’s Taiwan Affairs Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    China’s defence ministry said last week that Lai was a “Taiwan Strait crisis-maker” who had increased antagonism and confrontation, and had undermined peace and stability.

    Last month, China held war games code-named “Strait Thunder-2025A” around Taiwan, the “A” at the end suggesting there could be more to come.

    China called its May 2024 drills, launched just after Lai took office, “Joint Sword-2024A”, and, in October of that year, staged “Joint Sword-2024B”.

    (Reuters)

  • ASHA sisters are first ray of health in remote villages: LS Speaker Om Birla

    Source: Government of India

    Source: Government of India (4)

    Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla lauded ASHA workers as the strongest pillar of the nation’s health system, asserting that during times of crisis, when many step back, ASHA sisters step forward with unwavering commitment and selfless service.

    Speaking at the event organised by Promising Indian Society in collaboration with GAIL (Gas Authority of India Limited) at the UIT Auditorium, Birla said that if essential health services are reaching India’s most remote villages today, much of the credit goes to these frontline health workers. “They work tirelessly, day and night, for every pregnant woman, newborn, and person in need,” he said.

    Recalling the COVID-19 pandemic, Birla highlighted the dedication of ASHA sisters who, despite the risks, went door-to-door identifying the sick, delivering medicines, and connecting people to medical care, even as many were reluctant to step out. Their contribution, he said, is vital in nurturing a healthier, more self-reliant, and dignified future generation.

    Birla described the ASHA workers as embodiments of compassion, self-confidence, and dedication. He noted that the dialogue was more than just a formal gathering; it was a collective resolve that every citizen in the Kota-Bundi parliamentary constituency should enjoy good health, every expecting mother and child should be safe, and even the most marginalised individuals should live with dignity.

    Acknowledging their significant role in the Suposhit Maa Abhiyan, Birla applauded the efforts of ASHA sisters in reaching the most underserved sections of society. He urged them to identify pregnant women lacking adequate nutrition or medical care, so they can be supported effectively.

    Referring to the newly inaugurated Pradhan Mantri Divyasha Kendra in Kota, Birla mentioned that essential assistive devices will now be delivered to the homes of Divyangjans (persons with disabilities).

    He appealed to ASHA workers to help identify such individuals in their areas and inform the MBS Hospital or Lok Sabha office to ensure timely assistance. (IANS)

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Enhanced Proactive Policing in Katherine

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    Due to an increase in police demand, Katherine police have increased proactive measures in order to drive down crime and antisocial behaviour.

    Alcohol remains a primary catalyst for crime and anti-social behaviour across the region, and in response, police have significantly increased Banned Drinkers Orders (BDO) for problem drinkers.

    February to April saw a 354% increase in the number of BDO’s issued. For the month of April, 145 people were rejected from purchasing alcohol due to an active BDO.

    In addition to these measures, since March 2025, 280 SupportLink referrals have been made by Katherine Police. Support Link delivers targeted referral and diversion services to people who require social services assistance. These referrals can be made to address issues such as domestic and family violence, drug and alcohol dependence, drug and alcohol diversions and homelessness.

    Commander Terry Zhang said, “Our members have seen a noticeable increase in the demand for our services due to a sudden surge of people into the Katherine Region.

    “In response to this, we have shifted to proactively tackling the drivers of crime and antisocial behaviour through support services and alcohol restrictions. In addition to these changes, we will also welcome a further 15 new constables who will start in Katherine from mid-June to further enhance our targeted operations.

    “Police have also continued to work closely with other organisations in Katherine. This includes working with the local council on early morning patrols focused on rough sleepers, and a joint operation with Public Housing Officers targeting problem tenancies.

    “Police would like to thank the Katherine Community for their ongoing support and re-iterate our commitment to keeping the Katherine community safe.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-Evening Report: David Littleproud cites nuclear energy disagreement as major factor in Coalition split

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Quiggin, Professor, School of Economics, The University of Queensland

    Nationals’ leader David Littleproud has singled out nuclear energy as a key reason for his party’s spectacular split from the Liberals, as both parties seek to rebuild following the Coalition’s devastating election loss.

    Speaking to the media on Tuesday, Littleproud said:

    our party room has got to a position where we will not be re-entering a Coalition agreement with the Liberal Party […] Those positions that we couldn’t get comfort around [include] nuclear being a part of an energy grid into the future.

    The junior partner had long held strong sway over the Coalition’s climate and energy stance, including the plan to build nuclear reactors at seven sites across Australia using taxpayer funds.

    After public sentiment appeared to go against nuclear power during the election, the Nationals had reportedly been weighing up changes to the policy. It would have involved walking away from the plan to build reactors and instead lifting a federal ban on nuclear power.

    But some quarters of the Nationals remained deeply wedded to the original nuclear plan. Meanwhile, Nationals senator Matt Canavan had called for the net-zero emissions target to be scrapped, and Nationals senator Bridget McKenzie insisted renewable energy was harming regional communities.

    Now, with the Nationals unshackled from the binds of the Coalition agreement, the future of its energy policy will be keenly watched.

    A graceful way out of nuclear

    Littleproud on Tuesday did not confirm where exactly he expected the Nationals to land on energy policy. But he rejected suggestions his party was unwise to stick with the nuclear policy after the Coalition’s poor election result, saying public opinion had been swayed by a “scare campaign”.

    Even if the Coalition had won the election, however, the policy was running out of time.

    CSIRO analysis showed, contrary to the Coalition’s claims, a nuclear program that began this year was unlikely to deliver power by 2037. But up to 90% of coal-fired power stations in the national electricity market are projected to retire before 2035, and the entire fleet is due to shut down before 2040.

    Now, the earliest possible start date for nuclear is after the 2028 election. This means plugging nuclear plants into the grid as coal-fired power stations retire becomes virtually impossible.

    This very impossibility provided the National Party with a graceful way out of the policy. It could have regretfully accepted the moment had passed.

    With nuclear out of the picture, and coal-fired power almost certain to be phased out, that would have left two choices for the Coalition: a grid dominated by gas, or one dominated by renewables.

    However, expanding gas supply frequently requires the controversial process of fracking, which is deservedly unpopular in many regions where it’s undertaken.

    What’s more, gas is an expensive energy source which can only be a marginal add-on in the electricity mix, used alongside batteries to secure the system during peak times.

    Logically, that would have left renewable energy as the only feasible energy policy option for the Nationals – but it wasn’t to be.

    ‘Technology agnostic’?

    Littleproud claims the party is technology agnostic about energy policy. In practice, that would mean choosing the technology that can reduce emissions most rapidly and cheaply, rather than being bound by ideology or political expediency.

    In principle, this approach is the right one. Many energy sources can reduce carbon emissions, including solar and wind (backed up by energy storage), nuclear, hydro-electricity, and even gas and coal if emissions can be captured and stored.

    But the Nationals’ claim to agnosticism is not reflected in its actual policies which, in recent years, have been characterised by dogmatic faith in nuclear and so-called “clean” coal, and an equally dogmatic rejection of solar, wind and battery storage.

    The Nationals’ hostility to renewables may in part be driven by pressure from anti-renewable activist groups.

    The Institute of Public Affairs, for example, has sought to promote rural opposition to renewables and emissions reduction and focused its efforts on Nationals-held seats

    And the now-defunct Waubra Foundation, named after the small town in northwest Victoria, opposed wind farms and claimed they caused health problems. The group was created by an oil and gas executive with no apparent links to the town.

    What about net-zero?

    Elements of the Nationals had been calling for the Coalition to abandon support for Australia’s target of net-zero emissions by 2050.

    This would mostly have been a symbolic measure, since the target does not require, or prohibit, any particular policy in the short run. It may, however, have exposed Australia’s agricultural exports to tariffs on carbon-intensive goods.

    The move would have been disastrous for the Liberals’ chances of regaining urban seats, and for investment in renewable energy. So it was never likely to be accepted as part of a Coalition agreement.

    The Nationals could have chosen to accept the target in return for concessions elsewhere. Or it might have sought an agreement with the Liberals where the parties agreed to differ.

    It’s not clear what role, if any, net-zero played in the dissolution of the Coalition agreement. But in the end, the Nationals decided to walk away from it altogether.

    Renewables can be good for the bush

    Nationals Senate leader Bridget McKenzie last week said her party was concerned that renewable energy targets are “impacting rural and regional communities”. The party has long voiced concern about the impact of large-scale wind and solar projects in the bush.

    However, many farmers and other rural landowners benefit financially from hosting solar and wind farms, which, in many cases, do not prevent the land from also being used for farming.

    Concerns that wind farms and solar panels might slash the value of neighbouring properties have been shown to be ill-founded.

    And importantly, the increasing frequency of extreme climate events is already a challenge to Australia’s agriculture sector and will become more difficult. Tackling the problem is in regional Australia’s interests.

    The Nationals’ hostility to renewable energy comes at a cost to rural and regional Australians. But Littleproud clearly could not balance competing views within the Nationals on energy policy while inking a deal with the Liberals. Instead, the party will now go it alone.

    John Quiggin is a former Member of the Climate Change Authority and has written extensively in support of a transition to clean energy

    ref. David Littleproud cites nuclear energy disagreement as major factor in Coalition split – https://theconversation.com/david-littleproud-cites-nuclear-energy-disagreement-as-major-factor-in-coalition-split-256904

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Russian enterprises are developing the Chinese market through the platform of the Harbin International Economic and Trade Fair

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    HARBIN, May 20 (Xinhua) — “I really like Russian-made snacks and drinks. I am glad that such a wide range of Russian products are available here. It is worth buying,” said Huang Yulong, a resident of Harbin, the capital of northeast China’s Heilongjiang Province, while visiting the “Made in Russia” festival and fair in the city.

    The event was opened by the Russian Export Center (REC) on the sidelines of the 34th Harbin International Economic and Trade Fair, which was held from May 17 to 21.

    According to REC, the exhibition area of the fair was more than 1,000 square meters. It presented products from over 100 Russian manufacturers from 50 regions of the country. The assortment included various food products, drinks, biologically active additives /BAA/, as well as jewelry and souvenirs presented in Harbin for the first time. A stand with cosmetics from Russian manufacturers was also created.

    “Visitors can try and purchase products in the tasting area, as well as order their favorite products through national Made in Russia stores on leading Chinese marketplaces,” noted REC General Director Veronika Nikishina, naming confectionery, dairy products, and alcoholic beverages as the most popular categories of Russian goods in China, and marketplaces as the main sales channel.

    “During the festival-fair, we are holding specialized business-to-business negotiations between Chinese and Russian companies, which provides a unique opportunity to establish important business contacts and expand the horizons of cooperation,” she added.

    Irina Lezhacheva, a representative of the Lunskoye More company, a manufacturer of caviar products and fish cooking, expressed hope that thanks to this event their company will be able to find more Chinese partners and establish cooperation with them.

    In addition to the traditional business program, this year’s fair will feature entertainment and gaming zones where visitors can evaluate Russian IT developments and gaming industry projects.

    “We expect that our game will appeal to Chinese children, students, parents and teachers. They will play it and learn to program,” said Anastasia Starostinskaya, vice president of the Association of Participants of Technological Circles and head of the project office of the National Cyber-Physical Platform “Berloga”.

    Let us recall that the current festival-fair is the fifth such event in China. And for the second time, REC is organizing it on the sidelines of the Harbin International Trade and Economic Fair. The event also saw the opening of a Made in Russia retail store in Harbin.

    Since the beginning of 2024, REC has already held four Made in Russia festivals and fairs in China. In anticipation of the 2024 Spring Festival, the first fair was held in the cities of Shenyang and Dalian in Liaoning Province /Northeast China/. The second event took place in May in Harbin. The third fair was held in November in Chengdu /the administrative center of Sichuan Province, Southwest China/. The fourth fair was held in Shenyang in January 2025.

    According to V. Nikishina, the Made in Russia festivals and fairs demonstrate very significant effects. “To consolidate the fundamental steps towards increasing sales, today we are developing, together with our Chinese partners, a trade infrastructure for promoting Russian products under our national brand. We are opening national expositions, trade missions, permanent offline and online trade points,” she added.

    “We opened the first warehouse distribution center in Suifenhe, Heilongjiang Province, with an area of over 4,500 square meters, to supply and continuously provide the Made in Russia retail chain with original and high-quality Russian products,” explained V. Nikishina, noting that the Chinese market is one of the most important and promising in the world for the extensive development of the national brand.

    According to her information, currently more than 2.5 thousand product items are available for Chinese buyers on 10 popular electronic trading platforms. It is in China that the widest distribution network of national “Made in Russia” stores is located, sales of which by the end of 2024 increased by 250% compared to the previous year.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: In Belarus, according to the results of four months of 2025, the results for investments and real incomes of the population exceeded forecasts – Ministry of Economy

    Translation. Region: Russian Federal

    Source: People’s Republic of China in Russian – People’s Republic of China in Russian –

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    MINSK, May 20 (Xinhua) — Belarus has achieved higher-than-expected results in terms of investment and real incomes of the population in the first four months of 2025, the press service of the country’s Economy Ministry reported on Monday.

    GDP growth for January-April of this year was 2.8 percent. Its drivers were such sectors as construction /11.4 percent/, industry /1.3 percent/, information and communications /5.5 percent/ and trade /2.6 percent/.

    Retail turnover for January-April 2025 increased by 10%, which is due to the accelerated growth of real incomes of the population /12% for January-March/.

    In January-April, there was a significant increase in investment in fixed capital – plus 15 percent. Belarusian enterprises continue to actively invest in technological development and renewal: costs for the purchase of machinery and equipment increased by more than 20 percent.

    Also, over four months, more than 1.14 million square meters of housing were put into operation in the country /112.1 percent of the level of the same period last year/.

    Annual inflation in Belarus has accelerated somewhat and amounted to 6.5 percent in April. This is due to decisions taken to increase regulated prices/tariffs/, as well as to the growth of prices for some goods, mainly imported ones. –0–

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Alex Skinner appointed Chair of Quotable Value

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    Alex Skinner has been appointed as Chair of Quotable Value (QV) from 1 June, State Owned Enterprises Minister Simeon Brown says.QV is New Zealand’s largest provider of rating valuation and property services.“Alex Skinner has been a valued member of the QV Board since 2019, contributing significant governance expertise built on his extensive experience as a Chair. A Chartered Accountant and former partner at KPMG, Alex brings a robust financial background to the role, as well as an in-depth understanding of QV’s operations and strategic priorities,” Mr Brown says. “During his tenure on the Board, Mr Skinner has delivered strong leadership as Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee since 2020. His accomplishments include leading the successful transition of QV’s financial functions in-house and driving improvements in financial reporting, ensuring strong accountability throughout the organisation.“Mr Skinner’s expertise and commitment will provide continuity and stability for QV’s governance and its relationships with management, councils, and other external stakeholders. His appointment reflects the organisation’s ongoing commitment to strong and effective leadership.”

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: President Lai delivers address on first anniversary of taking office  

    Source: Republic of China Taiwan

    Details
    2025-05-13
    President Lai interviewed by Japan’s Nikkei  
    In a recent interview with Japan’s Nikkei, President Lai Ching-te responded to questions regarding Taiwan-Japan and Taiwan-United States relations, cross-strait relations, the semiconductor industry, and the international economic and trade landscape. The interview was published by Nikkei on May 13. President Lai indicated that Nikkei, Inc. is a global news organization that has received significant recognition both domestically and internationally, and that he is deeply honored to be interviewed by Nikkei and grateful for their invitation. The president said that he would like to take this rare opportunity to thank Japan’s government, National Diet, society, and public for their longstanding support for Taiwan. Noting that current Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru and former Prime Ministers Abe Shinzo, Suga Yoshihide, and Kishida Fumio have all strongly supported Taiwan, he said that the peoples of Taiwan and Japan also have a deep mutual affection, and that through the interview, he hopes to enhance the bilateral relationship between Taiwan and Japan, deepen the affection between our peoples, and foster more future cooperation to promote prosperity and development in both countries. In response to questions raised on the free trade system and the recent tariff war, President Lai indicated that over the past few decades, the free economy headed by the Western world and led by the US has brought economic prosperity and political stability to Taiwan and Japan. At the same time, he said, we have also learned or followed many Western values. The president said he believes that Taiwan and Japan are exemplary students, but some countries are not. Therefore, he said, the biggest crisis right now is China, which exploits the free trade system to engage in plagiarism and counterfeiting, infringe on intellectual property rights, and even provide massive government subsidies that facilitate the dumping of low-priced goods worldwide, which has a major impact on many countries including Japan and Taiwan. If this kind of unfair trade is not resolved, he said, the stable societies and economic prosperity we have painstakingly built over decades, as well as some of the values we pursue, could be destroyed. Therefore, President Lai said he thinks it is worthwhile for us to observe the recent willingness of the US to address unfair trade, and if necessary, offer assistance. President Lai emphasized that the national strategic plan for Taiwanese industries is for them to be rooted in Taiwan while expanding their global presence and marketing worldwide. Therefore, he said, while the 32 percent tariff increase imposed by the US on Taiwan is indeed a major challenge, we are willing to address it seriously and find opportunities within that challenge, making Taiwan’s strategic plan for industry even more comprehensive. When asked about Taiwan’s trade arrangements, President Lai indicated that in 2010 China accounted for 83.8 percent of Taiwan’s outbound investment, but last year it accounted for only 7.5 percent. In 2020, he went on, 43.9 percent of Taiwan’s exports went to China, but that figure dropped to 31.7 percent in 2024. The president said that we have systematically transferred investments from Taiwanese enterprises to Japan, Southeast Asia, Europe, and the US. Therefore, he said, last year Taiwan’s largest outbound investment was in the US, accounting for roughly 40 percent of the total. Nevertheless, only 23.4 percent of Taiwanese products were sold to the US, with 76.6 percent sold to places other than the US, he said.  The president emphasized that we don’t want to put all our eggs in one basket, and hope to establish a global presence. Under these circumstances, he said, Taiwan is very eager to cooperate with Japan. President Lai stated that at this moment, the Indo-Pacific and international community really need Japan’s leadership, especially to make the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) excel in its functions, and also requested Japan to support Taiwan’s CPTPP accession. The president said that Taiwan hopes to sign an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) with Japan to build closer ties in economic trade and promote further investment, and that we also hope to strengthen relations with the European Union, and even other regions. Currently, he said, we are proposing an initiative on global semiconductor supply chain partnerships for democracies, because the semiconductor industry is an ecosystem. The president raised the example that Japan has materials, equipment, and technology; the US has IC design and marketing; Taiwan has production and manufacturing; and the Netherlands excels in equipment, saying we therefore hope to leverage Taiwan’s advantages in production and manufacturing to connect the democratic community and establish a global non-red supply chain for semiconductors, ensuring further world prosperity and development in the future, and ensuring that free trade can continue to function without being affected by dumping, which would undermine future prosperity and development. The president stated that as we want industries to expand their global presence and market internationally while staying rooted here in Taiwan, having industries rooted in Taiwan involves promoting pay raises for employees, tax cuts, and deregulation, as well as promoting enterprise investment tax credits. He said that we have also proposed Three Major Programs for Investing in Taiwan for Taiwanese enterprises and are actively resolving issues regarding access to water, electricity, land, human resources, and professional talent so that the business community can return to Taiwan to invest, or enterprises in Taiwan can increase their investments. He went on to say that we are also actively signing bilateral investment agreements with friends and allies so that when our companies invest and expand their presence abroad, their rights and interests as investors are ensured.  President Lai mentioned that Taiwan hopes to sign an EPA with Japan, similar to the Taiwan-US Initiative on 21st-Century Trade and the Economic Prosperity Partnership Dialogue, or the Enhanced Trade Partnership arrangement with the United Kingdom, or similar agreements or memorandums of understanding with Canada and Australia that allow Taiwanese products to be marketed worldwide, concluding that those are our overall arrangements. Looking at the history of Taiwan’s industrial development, President Lai indicated, of course it began in Taiwan, and then moved west to China and south to Southeast Asia. He said that we hope to take this opportunity to strengthen cooperation with Japan to the north, across the Pacific Ocean to the east, and develop the North American market, making Taiwan’s industries even stronger. In other words, he said, while Taiwan sees the current reciprocal tariffs imposed by the US as a kind of challenge, it also views these changes positively. On the topic of pressure from China affecting Taiwan’s participation in international frameworks such as the CPTPP or its signing of an EPA with Japan, President Lai responded that the key point is what kind of attitude we should adopt in viewing China’s acts of oppression. If we act based on our belief in free trade, he said, or on the universal values we pursue – democracy, freedom, and respect for human rights – and also on the understanding that a bilateral trade agreement between Taiwan and Japan would contribute to the economic prosperity and development of both countries, or that Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP would benefit progress and prosperity in the Indo-Pacific region, then he hopes that friends and allies will strongly support us. On the Trump administration’s intentions regarding the reciprocal tariff policy and the possibility of taxing semiconductors, as well as how Taiwan plans to respond, President Lai said that since President Trump took office, he has paid close attention to interviews with both him and his staff. The president said that several of President Trump’s main intentions are: First, he wants to address the US fiscal situation. For example, President Lai said, while the US GDP is about US$29 trillion annually, its national debt stands at US$36 trillion, which is roughly 124 percent of GDP. Second, he went on, annual government spending exceeds US$6.5 trillion, but revenues are only around US$4.5 trillion, resulting in a nearly US$2 trillion deficit each year, about 7 percent of GDP. Third, he said, the US pays nearly US$1.2 trillion in interest annually, which exceeds the US$1 trillion defense budget and accounts for more than 3 percent of GDP. Fourth, President Trump still wants to implement tax cuts, aiming to reduce taxes for 85 percent of Americans, he said, noting that this would cost between US$500 billion and US$1 trillion. These points, President Lai said, illustrate his first goal: solving the fiscal problem. President Lai went on to say that second, the US feels the threat of China and believes that reindustrialization is essential; without reindustrialization, the US risks a growing gap in industrial capacity compared to China. Third, he said, in this era of global smart technology, President Trump wants to lead the nation to become a world center of AI. Fourth, he aims to ensure world peace and prevent future wars, President Lai said. In regard to what the US seeks to achieve, he said he believes these four areas form the core of the Trump administration’s intentions, and that is why President Trump has raised tariffs, demanded that trading partners purchase more American goods, and encouraged friendly and allied nations to invest in the US, all in order to achieve these goals. President Lai indicated that the 32 percent reciprocal tariff poses a critical challenge for Taiwan, and we must treat it seriously. He said that our approach is not confrontation, but negotiation to reduce tariffs, and that we have also agreed to measures such as procurement, investment, resolving non-tariff trade barriers, and addressing origin washing in order to effectively reduce the trade deficit between Taiwan and the US. Of course, he said, through this negotiation process, we also hope to turn challenges into opportunities. The president said that first, we aim to start negotiations from the proposal of zero tariffs and seek to establish a bilateral trade agreement with the US. Second, he went on, we hope to support US reindustrialization and its aim to become a world AI hub through investment, while simultaneously upgrading and transforming Taiwan’s industries, which would help further integrate Taiwan’s industries into the US economic structure, ensuring Taiwan’s long-term development.  President Lai emphasized again that Taiwan’s national industrial strategy is for industries to stay firmly rooted in Taiwan while expanding their global presence and marketing worldwide. He repeated that we have gone from moving westward across the Taiwan Strait, to shifting southbound, to working closer northward with Japan, and now the time is ripe for us to expand eastward by investing in North America. In other words, he said, while we take this challenge seriously to protect national interests and ensure that no industry is sacrificed, we also hope these negotiations will lead to deeper Taiwan-US trade relations through Taiwanese investment in the US, concluding that these are our expectations. The president stated that naturally, the reciprocal tariffs imposed by the US will have an impact on Taiwanese industries, so in response, the Taiwanese government has already proposed support measures for affected industries totaling NT$93 billion. In addition, he said, we have outlined broader needs for Taiwan’s long-term development, which will be covered by a special budget proposal of NT$410 billion, noting that this has already been approved by the Executive Yuan and will be submitted to the Legislative Yuan for review. He said that this special budget proposal addresses four main areas: supporting industries, stabilizing employment, protecting people’s livelihoods, and enhancing resilience. As for tariffs on semiconductors, President Lai said, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) has committed to investing in the US at the request of its customers. He said he believes that TSMC’s industry chain will follow suit, and that these are concrete actions that are unrelated to tariffs. However, he said, if the US were to invoke Section 232 and impose tariffs on semiconductors or related industries, it would discourage Taiwanese semiconductor and ICT investments in the US, and that we will make this position clear to the US going forward. President Lai indicated that among Taiwan’s exports to the US, there are two main categories: ICT products and electronic components, which together account for 65.4 percent. These are essential to the US, he said, unlike final goods such as cups, tables, or mattresses. He went on to say that what Taiwan sells to the US are the technological products required by AI designers like NVIDIA, AMD, Amazon, Google, and Apple, and that therefore, we will make sure the US understands clearly that we are not exporting end products, but the high-tech components necessary for the US to reindustrialize and become a global AI center. Furthermore, the president said, Taiwan is also willing to increase its defense budget and military procurement. He stated that Taiwan is committed to defending itself and is strongly willing to cooperate with friends and allies to ensure regional peace and stability, and that this is also something President Trump hopes to see. Asked whether TSMC’s fabs overseas could weaken Taiwan’s strategic position as a key hub for semiconductor manufacturing, and whether that could then give other countries fewer incentives to protect Taiwan, President Lai responded by saying that political leaders around the world including Japan’s Prime Minister Ishiba and former Prime Ministers Abe, Suga, and Kishida have emphasized, at the G7 and other major international fora, that peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait are essential for global security and prosperity. In other words, he explained, the international community cares about Taiwan and supports peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait because Taiwan is located in the first island chain in the Indo-Pacific, directly facing China. He pointed out that if Taiwan is not protected, China’s expansionist ambitions will certainly grow, which would impact the current rules-based international order. Thus, he said, the international community willingly cares about Taiwan and supports stability in the Taiwan Strait – that is the reason, and it has no direct connection with TSMC. He noted that after all, TSMC has not made investments in that many countries, stressing that, on that point, it is clear. President Lai said that TSMC’s investments in Japan, Europe, and the US are all natural, normal economic and investment activities. He said that Taiwan is a democratic country whose society is based on the rule of law, so when Taiwanese companies need to invest around the world for business needs, the government will support those investments in principle so long as they do not harm national interests. President Lai said that after TSMC Chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家) held a press conference with President Trump to announce the investment in the US, Chairman Wei returned to Taiwan to hold a press conference with him at the Presidential Office, where the chairman explained to the Taiwanese public that TSMC’s R&D center will remain in Taiwan and that the facilities it has already committed to investing in here will not change and will not be affected. So, the president explained, to put it another way, TSMC will not be weakened by its investment in the US. He further emphasized that Taiwan has strengths in semiconductor manufacturing and is very willing to work alongside other democratic countries to promote the next stage of global prosperity and development. A question was raised about which side should be chosen between the US and China, under the current perception of a return to the Cold War, with East and West facing off as two opposing blocs. President Lai responded by saying that some experts and scholars describe the current situation as entering a new Cold War era between democratic and authoritarian camps; others assert that the war has already begun, including information warfare, economic and trade wars, and the ongoing wars in Europe – the Russo-Ukrainian War – and the Middle East, and the Israel-Hamas conflict. The president said that these are all matters experts have cautioned about, noting that he is not a historian and so will not attempt to define today’s political situation from an academic standpoint. However, he said, he believes that every country has a choice, which is to say, Taiwan, Japan, or any other nation does not necessarily have to choose between the US and China. What we are deciding, he said, is whether our country will maintain a democratic constitutional system or regress into an authoritarian regime, and this is essentially a choice of values – not merely a choice between two major powers. President Lai said that Taiwan’s situation is different from other countries because we face a direct threat from China. He pointed out that we have experienced military conflicts such as the August 23 Artillery Battle and the Battle of Guningtou – actual wars between the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China. He said that China’s ambition to annex Taiwan has never wavered, and that today, China’s political and military intimidation, as well as internal united front infiltration, are growing increasingly intense. Therefore, he underlined, to defend democracy and sovereignty, protect our free and democratic system, and ensure the safety of our people’s lives and property, Taiwan’s choice is clear. President Lai said that China’s military exercises are not limited to the Taiwan Strait, and include the East China Sea, South China Sea, and even the Sea of Japan, as well as areas around Korea and Australia. Emphasizing that Taiwan, Japan, Australia, and the Philippines are all democratic nations, the president said that Taiwan’s choice is clear, and that he believes Japan also has no other choice. We are all democratic countries, he said, whose people have long pursued the universal values of democracy, freedom, and respect for human rights, and that is what is most important. Regarding the intensifying tensions between the US and China, the president was asked what roles Taiwan and Japan can play. President Lai responded that in his view, Japan is a powerful nation, and he sincerely hopes that Japan can take a leading role amid these changes in the international landscape. He said he believes that countries in the Indo-Pacific region are also willing to respond. He suggested several areas where we can work together: first, democracy and peace; second, innovation and prosperity; and third, justice and sustainability. President Lai stated that in the face of authoritarian threats, we should let peace be our beacon and democracy our compass as we respond to the challenges posed by authoritarian states. Second, he added, as the world enters an era characterized by the comprehensive adoption of smart technologies, Japan and Taiwan should collaborate in the field of innovation to further drive regional prosperity and development. Third, he continued, is justice and sustainability. He explained that because international society still has many issues that need to be resolved, Taiwan and Japan can cooperate for the public good, helping countries in need around the world, and cooperating to address climate change and achieve net-zero transition by 2050. Asked whether he hopes that the US will continue to be a leader in the liberal democratic system, President Lai responded by saying that although the US severed diplomatic ties with the Republic of China, for the past few decades it has assisted Taiwan in various areas such as national defense, security, and countering threats from China, based on the Taiwan Relations Act and the Six Assurances. He pointed out that Taiwan has also benefited, directly and indirectly, in terms of politics, democracy, and economic prosperity thanks to the US, and so Taiwan naturally hopes that the US remains strong and continues to lead the world. President Lai said that when the US encounters difficulties, whether financial difficulties, reindustrialization issues, or becoming a global center for AI, and hopes to receive support from its friends and allies to jointly safeguard regional peace and stability, Taiwan is willing to stand together for a common cause. If the US remains strong, he said, that helps Taiwan, the Indo-Pacific region, and the world as a whole. Noting that while the vital role of the US on the global stage has not changed, the president said that after decades of shouldering global responsibilities, it has encountered some issues. Now, it has to make adjustments, he said, stating his firm belief that it will do so swiftly, and quickly resume its leadership role in the world. Asked to comment on remarks he made during his election campaign that he would like to invite China’s President Xi Jinping for bubble tea, President Lai responded that Taiwan is a peace-loving country, and Taiwanese society is inherently kind, and therefore we hope to get along peacefully with China, living in peace and mutual prosperity. So, during his term as vice president, he said, he was expressing the goodwill of Taiwanese society. Noting that while he of course understands that China’s President Xi would have certain difficulties in accepting this, he emphasized that the goodwill of Taiwanese society has always existed. If China reflects on the past two or three decades, he said, it will see that its economy was able to develop with Taiwan as its largest foreign investor. The president explained that every year, 1 to 2 million Taiwanese were starting businesses or investing in China, creating numerous job opportunities and stabilizing Chinese society. While many Taiwanese businesses have profited, he said, Chinese society has benefited even more. He added that every time a natural disaster occurs, if China is in need, Taiwanese always offer donations. Therefore, the president said, he hopes that China can face the reality of the Republic of China’s existence and understand that the people of Taiwan hope to continue living free and democratic lives with respect for human rights. He also expressed hope that China can pay attention to the goodwill of Taiwanese society. He underlined that we have not abandoned the notion that as long as there is parity, dignity, exchange, and cooperation, the goodwill of choosing dialogue over confrontation and exchange over containment will always exist. Asked for his view on the national security reforms in response to China’s espionage activities and infiltration attempts, President Lai said that China’s united front infiltration activities in Taiwan are indeed very serious. He said that China’s ambitions to annex Taiwan rely not only on the use of political and military intimidation, but also on its long-term united front and infiltration activities in Taiwanese society. Recently, he pointed out, the Taiwan High Prosecutors Office of the Ministry of Justice prosecuted 64 spies, which is three times the number in 2021, and in addition to active-duty military personnel, many retired military personnel were also indicted. Moreover, he added, Taiwan also has the Chinese Unification Promotion Party, which has a background in organized crime, Rehabilitation Alliance Party, which was established by retired military personnel, and Republic of China Taiwan Military Government, which is also composed of retired generals. He explained that these are all China’s front organizations, and they plan one day to engage in collaboration within Taiwan, which shows the seriousness of China’s infiltration in Taiwan. Therefore, the president said, in the recent past he convened a high-level national security meeting and proposed 17 response strategies across five areas. He then enumerated the five areas: first, to address China’s threat to Taiwan’s sovereignty; second, to respond to the threat of China’s obscuring the Taiwanese people’s sense of national identity; third, to respond to the threat of China’s infiltrating and recruiting members of the ROC Armed Forces as spies; fourth, to respond to the threat of China’s infiltration of Taiwanese society through societal exchanges and united front work; and fifth, to respond to the threat of China using “integration plans” to draw Taiwan’s young people and Taiwanese businesses into its united front activities. In response to these five major threats, he said, he has proposed 17 response strategies, one of which being to restore the military trial system. He explained that if active-duty military personnel commit military crimes, they must be subject to military trials, and said that this expresses the Taiwanese government’s determination to respond to China’s united front infiltration and the subversion of Taiwan. Responding to the question of which actions Taiwan can take to guard against China’s threats to regional security, President Lai said that many people are worried that the increasingly tense situation may lead to accidental conflict and the outbreak of war. He stated his own view that Taiwan is committed to facing China’s various threats with caution. Taiwan is never the source of these problems, he emphasized, and if there is an accidental conflict and it turns into a full-scale war, it will certainly be a deliberate act by China using an accidental conflict as a pretext. He said that when China expanded its military presence in the East China Sea and South China Sea, the international community did not stop it; when China conducted exercises in the Taiwan Strait, the international community did not take strong measures to prevent this from happening. Now, he continued, China is conducting gray-zone exercises, which are aggressions against not only the Taiwan Strait, the South China Sea, and the East China Sea, but also extending to the Sea of Japan and waters near South Korea. He said that at this moment, Taiwan, the Philippines, Japan, and even the US should face these developments candidly and seriously, and we must exhibit unity and cooperation to prevent China’s gray-zone aggression from continuing to expand and prevent China from shifting from a military exercise to combat. If no action is taken now, the president said, the situation may become increasingly serious. Asked about the view of some US analysts who point out that China will have the ability to invade Taiwan around 2027, President Lai responded that Taiwan, as the country on the receiving end of threats and aggression, must plan for the worst and make the best preparations. He recalled a famous saying from the armed forces: “Do not count on the enemy not showing up; count on being ready should it strike.” This is why, he said, he proposed the Four Pillars of Peace action plan. First, he said, we must strengthen our national defense. Second, he added, we must strengthen economic resilience, adding that not only must our economy remain strong, but it must also be resilient, and that we cannot put all our eggs in the same basket, in China, as we have done in the past. Third, he continued, we must stand shoulder to shoulder with friends and allies such as Japan and the US, as well as the democratic community, and we must demonstrate the strength of deterrence to prevent China from making the wrong judgment. Fourth, he emphasized, as long as China treats Taiwan with parity and dignity, Taiwan is willing to conduct exchanges and cooperate with China and seek cross-strait peace and mutual prosperity through exchanges and cooperation. Regarding intensifying US-China confrontation, the president was asked in which areas he thinks Taiwan and Japan should strengthen cooperation; with Japan’s Ishiba administration also being a minority government, the president was asked for his expectations for the Ishiba administration. President Lai said that in the face of rapid and tremendous changes in the political situation, every government faces considerable challenges, especially for minority governments, but the Japanese government led by Prime Minister Ishiba has quite adequately responded with various strategies. Furthermore, he said, Japan is different from Taiwan, explaining that although Japan’s ruling party lacks a majority, political parties in Japan engage in competition domestically while exhibiting unity externally. He said that Taiwan’s situation is more challenging, because the ruling and opposition parties hold different views on the direction of the country, due to differences in national identity. The president expressed his hope that in the future Taiwan and Japan will enjoy even more comprehensive cooperation. He stated that he has always believed that deep historical bonds connect Taiwan and Japan. Over the past several decades, he said, when encountering natural disasters and tragedies, our two nations have assisted each other with mutual care and support. He said that the affection between the people of Taiwan and Japan is like that of a family. Pointing out that both countries face the threat of authoritarianism, he said that we share a mission to safeguard universal values such as democracy, freedom, and respect for human rights. The president said that our two countries should be more open to cooperation in various areas to maintain regional peace and stability as well as to strengthen cooperation in economic and industrial development, such as for semiconductor industry chains and everyday applications of AI, including robots and drones, adding that we can also cooperate on climate change response, such as in hydrogen energy and other strategies. He said our two countries should also continue to strengthen people-to-people exchanges. He then took the opportunity to once again invite our good friends from Japan to visit Taiwan for tourism and learn more about Taiwan, saying that the Taiwanese people wholeheartedly welcome our Japanese friends.  

    Details
    2025-04-06
    President Lai delivers remarks on US tariff policy response
    On April 6, President Lai Ching-te delivered recorded remarks regarding the impact of the 32 percent tariff that the United States government recently imposed on imports from Taiwan in the name of reciprocity. In his remarks, President Lai explained that the government will adopt five response strategies, including making every effort to improve reciprocal tariff rates through negotiations, adopting a support plan for affected domestic industries, adopting medium- and long-term economic development plans, forming new “Taiwan plus the US” arrangements, and launching industry listening tours. The president emphasized that as we face this latest challenge, the government and civil society will work hand in hand, and expressed hope that all parties, both ruling and opposition, will support the measures that the Executive Yuan will take to open up a broader path for Taiwan’s economy. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: My fellow citizens, good evening. The US government recently announced higher tariffs on countries around the world in the name of reciprocity, including imposing a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan. This is bound to have a major impact on our nation. Various countries have already responded, and some have even adopted retaliatory measures. Tremendous changes in the global economy are expected. Taiwan is an export-led economy, and in facing future challenges there will inevitably be difficulties, so we must proceed carefully to turn danger into safety. During this time, I want to express gratitude to all sectors of society for providing valuable opinions, which the government regards highly, and will use as a reference to make policy decisions.  However, if we calmly and carefully analyze Taiwan’s trade with the US, we find that last year Taiwan’s exports to the US were valued at US$111.4 billion, accounting for 23.4 percent of total export value, with the other 75-plus percent of products sold worldwide to countries other than the US. Of products sold to the US, competitive ICT products and electronic components accounted for 65.4 percent. This shows that Taiwan’s economy does still have considerable resilience. As long as our response strategies are appropriate, and the public and private sectors join forces, we can reduce impacts. Please do not panic. To address the reciprocal tariffs by the US, Taiwan has no plans to adopt retaliatory tariffs. There will be no change in corporate investment commitments to the US, as long as they are consistent with national interests. But we must ensure the US clearly understands Taiwan’s contributions to US economic development. More importantly, we must actively seek to understand changes in the global economic situation, strengthen Taiwan-US industry cooperation, elevate the status of Taiwan industries in global supply chains, and with safeguarding the continued development of Taiwan’s economy as our goal, adopt the following five strategies to respond. Strategy one: Make every effort to improve reciprocal tariff rates through negotiations using the following five methods:  1. Taiwan has already formed a negotiation team led by Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君). The team includes members from the National Security Council, the Office of Trade Negotiations, and relevant Executive Yuan ministries and agencies, as well as academia and industry. Like the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement, negotiations on tariffs can start from Taiwan-US bilateral zero-tariff treatment. 2. To expand purchases from the US and thereby reduce the trade deficit, the Executive Yuan has already completed an inventory regarding large-scale procurement plans for agricultural, industrial, petroleum, and natural gas products, and the Ministry of National Defense has also proposed a military procurement list. All procurement plans will be actively pursued. 3. Expand investments in the US. Taiwan’s cumulative investment in the US already exceeds US$100 billion, creating approximately 400,000 jobs. In the future, in addition to increased investment in the US by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, other industries such as electronics, ICT, petrochemicals, and natural gas can all increase their US investments, deepening Taiwan-US industry cooperation. Taiwan’s government has helped form a “Taiwan investment in the US” team, and hopes that the US will reciprocate by forming a “US investment in Taiwan” team to bring about closer Taiwan-US trade cooperation, jointly creating a future economic golden age.  4. We must eliminate non-tariff barriers to trade. Non-tariff barriers are an indicator by which the US assesses whether a trading partner is trading fairly with the US. Therefore, we will proactively resolve longstanding non-tariff barriers so that negotiations can proceed more smoothly. 5. We must resolve two issues that have been matters of longstanding concern to the US. One regards high-tech export controls, and the other regards illegal transshipment of dumped goods, otherwise referred to as “origin washing.” Strategy two: We must adopt a plan for supporting our industries. For industries that will be affected by the tariffs, and especially traditional industries as well as micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises, we will provide timely and needed support and assistance. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) and his administrative team recently announced a package of 20 specific measures designed to address nine areas. Moving forward, the support we provide to different industries will depend on how they are affected by the tariffs, will take into account the particular features of each industry, and will help each industry innovate, upgrade, and transform. Strategy three: We must adopt medium- and long-term economic development plans. At this point in time, our government must simultaneously adopt new strategies for economic and industrial development. This is also the fundamental path to solutions for future economic challenges. The government will proactively cooperate with friends and allies, develop a diverse range of markets, and achieve closer integration of entities in the upper, middle, and lower reaches of industrial supply chains. This course of action will make Taiwan’s industrial ecosystem more complete, and will help Taiwanese industries upgrade and transform. We must also make good use of the competitive advantages we possess in such areas as semiconductor manufacturing, integrated chip design, ICT, and smart manufacturing to build Taiwan into an AI island, and promote relevant applications for food, clothing, housing, and transportation, as well as military, security and surveillance, next-generation communications, and the medical and health and wellness industries as we advance toward a smarter, more sustainable, and more prosperous new Taiwan. Strategy four: “Taiwan plus one,” i.e., new “Taiwan plus the US” arrangements: While staying firmly rooted in Taiwan, our enterprises are expanding their global presence and marketing worldwide. This has been our national economic development strategy, and the most important aspect is maintaining a solid base here in Taiwan. We absolutely must maintain a solid footing, and cannot allow the present strife to cause us to waver. Therefore, our government will incentivize investments, carry out deregulation, and continue to improve Taiwan’s investment climate by actively resolving problems involving access to water, electricity, land, human resources, and professional talent. This will enable corporations to stay in Taiwan and continue investing here. In addition, we must also help the overseas manufacturing facilities of offshore Taiwanese businesses to make necessary adjustments to support our “Taiwan plus one” policy, in that our national economic development strategy will be adjusted as follows: to stay firmly rooted in Taiwan while expanding our global presence, strengthening US ties, and marketing worldwide. We intend to make use of the new state of supply chains to strengthen cooperation between Taiwanese and US industries, and gain further access to US markets. Strategy five: Launch industry listening tours: All industrial firms, regardless of sector or size, will be affected to some degree once the US reciprocal tariffs go into effect. The administrative teams led by myself and Premier Cho will hear out industry concerns so that we can quickly resolve problems and make sure policies meet actual needs. My fellow citizens, over the past half-century and more, Taiwan has been through two energy crises, the Asian financial crisis, the global financial crisis, and pandemics. We have been able to not only withstand one test after another, but even turn crises into opportunities. The Taiwanese economy has emerged from these crises stronger and more resilient than ever. As we face this latest challenge, the government and civil society will work hand in hand, and I hope that all parties in the legislature, both ruling and opposition, will support the measures that the Executive Yuan will take to open up a broader path for Taiwan’s economy. Let us join together and give it our all. Thank you.

    Details
    2025-03-13
    President Lai holds press conference following high-level national security meeting
    On the afternoon of March 13, President Lai Ching-te convened a high-level national security meeting, following which he held a press conference. In remarks, President Lai introduced 17 major strategies to respond to five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces: China’s threat to national sovereignty, its threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting Taiwan’s military, its threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan, its threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges, and its threats from using “integrated development” to attract Taiwanese businesspeople and youth. President Lai emphasized that in the face of increasingly severe threats, the government will not stop doing its utmost to ensure that our national sovereignty is not infringed upon, and expressed hope that all citizens unite in solidarity to resist being divided. The president also expressed hope that citizens work together to increase media literacy, organize and participate in civic education activities, promptly expose concerted united front efforts, and refuse to participate in any activities that sacrifice national interests. As long as every citizen plays their part toward our nation’s goals for prosperity and security, he said, and as long as we work together, nothing can defeat us. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: At many venues recently, a number of citizens have expressed similar concerns to me. They have noticed cases in which members of the military, both active-duty and retired, have been bought out by China, sold intelligence, or even organized armed forces with plans to harm their own nation and its citizens. They have noticed cases in which entertainers willingly followed instructions from Beijing to claim that their country is not a country, all for the sake of personal career interests. They have noticed how messaging used by Chinese state media to stir up internal opposition in Taiwan is always quickly spread by specific channels. There have even been individuals making careers out of helping Chinese state media record united front content, spreading a message that democracy is useless and promoting skepticism toward the United States and the military to sow division and opposition. Many people worry that our country, as well as our hard-won freedom and democracy and the prosperity and progress we achieved together, are being washed away bit by bit due to these united front tactics. In an analysis of China’s united front, renowned strategic scholar Kerry K. Gershaneck expressed that China plans to divide and conquer us through subversion, infiltration, and acquisition of media, and by launching media warfare, psychological warfare, and legal warfare. What they are trying to do is to sow seeds of discord in our society, keep us occupied with internal conflicts, and cause us to ignore the real threat from outside. China’s ambition over the past several decades to annex Taiwan and stamp out the Republic of China has not changed for even a day. It continues to pursue political and military intimidation, and its united front infiltration of Taiwan’s society grows ever more serious. In 2005, China promulgated its so-called “Anti-Secession Law,” which makes using military force to annex Taiwan a national undertaking. Last June, China issued a 22-point set of “guidelines for punishing Taiwan independence separatists,” which regards all those who do not accept that “Taiwan is part of the People’s Republic of China” as targets for punishment, creating excuses to harm the people of Taiwan. China has also recently been distorting United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758, showing in all aspects China’s increasingly urgent threat against Taiwan’s sovereignty. Lately, China has been taking advantage of democratic Taiwan’s freedom, diversity, and openness to recruit gangs, the media, commentators, political parties, and even active-duty and retired members of the armed forces and police to carry out actions to divide, destroy, and subvert us from within. A report from the National Security Bureau indicates that 64 persons were charged last year with suspicion of spying for China, which was three times the number of persons charged for the same offense in 2021. Among them, the Unionist Party, Rehabilitation Alliance Party, and Republic of China Taiwan Military Government formed treasonous organizations to deploy armed forces for China. In a democratic and free society, such cases are appalling. But this is something that actually exists within Taiwan’s society today. China also actively plots ways to infiltrate and spy on our military. Last year, 28 active-duty and 15 retired members of the armed forces were charged with suspicion of involvement in spying for China, respectively comprising 43 percent and 23 percent of all of such cases – 66 percent in total. We are also alert to the fact that China has recently used widespread issuance of Chinese passports to entice Taiwanese citizens to apply for the Residence Permit for Taiwan Residents, permanent residency, or the Resident Identity Card, in an attempt to muddle Taiwanese people’s sense of national identity. China also views cross-strait exchanges as a channel for its united front against Taiwan, marking enemies in Taiwan internally, creating internal divisions, and weakening our sense of who the enemy really is. It intends to weaken public authority and create the illusion that China is “governing” Taiwan, thereby expanding its influence within Taiwan. We are also aware that China has continued to expand its strategy of integrated development with Taiwan. It employs various methods to demand and coerce Taiwanese businesses to increase their investments in China, entice Taiwanese youth to develop their careers in China, and unscrupulously seeks to poach Taiwan’s talent and steal key technologies. Such methods impact our economic security and greatly increase the risk of our young people heading to China. By its actions, China already satisfies the definition of a “foreign hostile force” as provided in the Anti-Infiltration Act. We have no choice but to take even more proactive measures, which is my purpose in convening this high-level national security meeting today. It is time we adopt proper preventive measures, enhance our democratic resilience and national security, and protect our cherished free and democratic way of life. Next, I will be giving a detailed account of the five major national security and united front threats Taiwan now faces and the 17 major strategies we have prepared in response. I. Responding to China’s threats to our national sovereignty We have a nation insofar as we have sovereignty, and we have the Republic of China insofar as we have Taiwan. Just as I said during my inaugural address last May, and in my National Day address last October: The moment when Taiwan’s first democratically elected president took the oath of office in 1996 sent a message to the international community, that Taiwan is a sovereign, independent, democratic nation. Among people here and in the international community, some call this land the Republic of China, some call it Taiwan, and some, the Republic of China Taiwan. The Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China are not subordinate to each other, and Taiwan resists any annexation or encroachment upon our sovereignty. The future of the Republic of China Taiwan must be decided by its 23 million people. This is the status quo that we must maintain. The broadest consensus in Taiwanese society is that we must defend our sovereignty, uphold our free and democratic way of life, and resolutely oppose annexation of Taiwan by China. (1) I request that the National Security Council (NSC), the Ministry of National Defense (MND), and the administrative team do their utmost to promote the Four Pillars of Peace action plan to demonstrate the people’s broad consensus and firm resolve, consistent across the entirety of our nation, to oppose annexation of Taiwan by China. (2) I request that the NSC and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs draft an action plan that will, through collaboration with our friends and allies, convey to the world our national will and broad social consensus in opposing annexation of Taiwan by China and in countering China’s efforts to erase Taiwan from the international community and downgrade Taiwan’s sovereignty. II. Responding to China’s threats from infiltration and espionage activities targeting our military (1) Comprehensively review and amend our Law of Military Trial to restore the military trial system, allowing military judges to return to the frontline and collaborate with prosecutorial, investigative, and judicial authorities in the handling of criminal cases in which active-duty military personnel are suspected of involvement in such military crimes as sedition, aiding the enemy, leaking confidential information, dereliction of duty, or disobedience. In the future, criminal cases involving active-duty military personnel who are suspected of violating the Criminal Code of the Armed Forces will be tried by a military court. (2) Implement supporting reforms, including the establishment of a personnel management act for military judges and separate organization acts for military courts and military prosecutors’ offices. Once planning and discussion are completed, the MND will fully explain to and communicate with the public to ensure that the restoration of the military trial system gains the trust and full support of society. (3) To deter the various types of controversial rhetoric and behavior exhibited by active-duty as well as retired military personnel that severely damage the morale of our national military, the MND must discuss and propose an addition to the Criminal Code of the Armed Forces on penalties for expressions of loyalty to the enemy as well as revise the regulations for military personnel and their families receiving retirement benefits, so as to uphold military discipline. III. Responding to China’s threats aimed at obscuring the national identity of the people of Taiwan (1) I request that the Ministry of the Interior (MOI), Mainland Affairs Council (MAC), and other relevant agencies, wherever necessary, carry out inspections and management of the documents involving identification that Taiwanese citizens apply for in China, including: passports, ID cards, permanent residence certificates, and residence certificates, especially when the applicants are military personnel, civil servants, or public school educators, who have an obligation of loyalty to Taiwan. This will be done to strictly prevent and deter united front operations, which are performed by China under the guise of “integrated development,” that attempt to distort our people’s national identity. (2) With respect to naturalization and integration of individuals from China, Hong Kong, and Macau into Taiwanese society, more national security considerations must be taken into account while also attending to Taiwan’s social development and individual rights: Chinese nationals applying for permanent residency in Taiwan must, in accordance with the law of Taiwan, relinquish their existing household registration and passport and may not hold dual identity status. As for the systems in place to process individuals from Hong Kong or Macau applying for residency or permanent residency in Taiwan, there will be additional provisions for long-term residency to meet practical needs. IV. Responding to China’s threats from united front infiltration into Taiwanese society through cross-strait exchanges  (1) There are increasing risks involved with travel to China. (From January 1, 2024 to today, the MAC has received reports of 71 Taiwanese nationals who went missing, were detained, interrogated, or imprisoned in China; the number of unreported people who have been subjected to such treatment may be several times that. Of those, three elderly I-Kuan Tao members were detained in China in December of last year and have not yet been released.) In light of this, relevant agencies must raise public awareness of those risks, continue enhancing public communication, and implement various registration systems to reduce the potential for accidents and the risks associated with traveling to China. (2) Implement a disclosure system for exchanges with China involving public officials at all levels of the central and local government. This includes everyone from administrative officials to elected representatives, from legislators to village and neighborhood chiefs, all of whom should make the information related to such exchanges both public and transparent so that they can be accountable to the people. The MOI should also establish a disclosure system for exchanges with China involving public welfare organizations, such as religious groups, in order to prevent China’s interference and united front activities at their outset. (3) Manage the risks associated with individuals from China engaging in exchanges with Taiwan: Review and approval of Chinese individuals coming to Taiwan should be limited to normal cross-strait exchanges and official interactions under the principles of parity and dignity, and relevant factors such as changes in the cross-strait situation should be taken into consideration. Strict restrictions should be placed on Chinese individuals who have histories with the united front coming to Taiwan, and Chinese individuals should be prohibited from coming to Taiwan to conduct activities related in any way to the united front. (4) Political interference from China and the resulting risks to national security should be avoided in cross-strait exchanges. This includes the review and management of religious, cultural, academic, and education exchanges, which should in principle be depoliticized and de-risked so as to simplify people-to-people exchanges and promote healthy and orderly exchanges. (5) To deter the united front tactics of a cultural nature employed by Chinese nationals to undermine Taiwan’s sovereignty, the Executive Yuan must formulate a solution to make our local cultural industries more competitive, including enhanced support and incentives for our film, television, and cultural and creative industries to boost their strengths in democratic cultural creation, raise international competitiveness, and encourage research in Taiwan’s own history and culture. (6) Strengthen guidance and management for entertainers developing their careers in China. The competent authorities should provide entertainers with guidelines on conduct while working in China, and make clear the scope of investigation and response to conduct that endangers national dignity. This will help prevent China from pressuring Taiwanese entertainers to make statements or act in ways that endanger national dignity. (7) The relevant authorities must adopt proactive, effective measures to prevent China from engaging in cognitive warfare against Taiwan or endangering cybersecurity through the internet, applications, AI, and other such tools. (8) To implement these measures, each competent authority must run a comprehensive review of the relevant administrative ordinances, measures, and interpretations, and complete the relevant regulations for legal enforcement. Should there be any shortcomings, the legal framework for national security should be strengthened and amendments to the National Security Act, Anti-Infiltration Act, Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area, Laws and Regulations Regarding Hong Kong & Macao Affairs, or Cyber Security Management Act should be proposed. Communication with the public should also be increased so that implementation can happen as soon as possible. V. Responding to threats from China using “integrated development” to attract Taiwanese businesspeople and youth (1) I request that the NSC and administrative agencies work together to carry out strategic structural adjustments to the economic and trade relations between Taiwan and China based on the strategies of putting Taiwan first and expanding our global presence while staying rooted in Taiwan. In addition, they should carry out necessary, orderly adjustments to the flow of talent, goods, money, and skills involved in cross-strait economic and trade relations based on the principle of strengthening Taiwan’s foundations to better manage risk. This will help boost economic security and give us more power to respond to China’s economic and trade united front and economic coercion against Taiwan. (2) I request that the Ministry of Education, MAC, Ministry of Economic Affairs, and other relevant agencies work together to comprehensively strengthen young students’ literacy education on China and deepen their understanding of cross-strait exchanges. I also request these agencies to widely publicize mechanisms for employment and entrepreneurship for Taiwan’s youth and provide ample information and assistance so that young students have more confidence in the nation’s future and more actively invest in building up and developing Taiwan. My fellow citizens, this year marks the 80th anniversary of the end of the Second World War. History tells us that any authoritarian act of aggression or annexation will ultimately end in failure. The only way we can safeguard freedom and prevail against authoritarian aggression is through solidarity. As we face increasingly severe threats, the government will not stop doing its utmost to ensure that our national sovereignty is not infringed upon, and to ensure that the freedom, democracy, and way of life of Taiwan’s 23 million people continues on as normal. But relying solely on the power of the government is not enough. What we need even more is for all citizens to stay vigilant and take action. Every citizen stands on the frontline of the defense of democracy and freedom. Here is what we can do together: First, we can increase our media literacy, and refrain from spreading and passing on united front messaging from the Chinese state. Second, we can organize and participate in civic education activities to increase our knowledge about united front operations and build up whole-of-society defense resilience. Third, we can promptly expose concerted united front efforts so that all malicious attempts are difficult to carry out. Fourth, we must refuse to participate in any activities that sacrifice national interests. The vigilance and action of every citizen forms the strongest line of defense against united front infiltration. Only through solidarity can we resist being divided. As long as every citizen plays their part toward our nation’s goals for prosperity and security, and as long as we work together, nothing can defeat us.

    Details
    2025-02-14
    President Lai holds press conference following high-level national security meeting
    On the morning of February 14, President Lai Ching-te convened the first high-level national security meeting of the year, following which he held a press conference. In remarks, President Lai announced that in this new year, the government will prioritize special budget allocations to ensure that Taiwan’s defense budget exceeds 3 percent of GDP. He stated that the government will also continue to reform national defense, reform our legal framework for national security, and advance our economic and trade strategy of being rooted in Taiwan while expanding globally. The president also proposed clear-cut national strategies for Taiwan-US relations, semiconductor industry development, and cross-strait relations. President Lai indicated that he instructed the national security and administrative teams to take swift action and deliver results, working within a stable strategic framework and according to the various policies and approaches outlined. He also instructed them to keep a close watch on changes in the international situation, seize opportunities whenever they arise, and address the concerns and hope of the citizens with concrete actions. He expressed hope that as long as citizens remain steadfast in their convictions, are willing to work hand in hand, stand firm amidst uncertainty, and look for ways to win within changing circumstances, Taiwan is certain to prevail in the test of time yet again. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: First, I would like to convey my condolences for the tragic incident which occurred at the Shin Kong Mitsukoshi department store in Taichung, which resulted in numerous casualties. I have instructed Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) to lead the relevant central government agencies in assisting Taichung’s municipal government with actively resolving various issues regarding the incident. It is my hope that these issues can be resolved efficiently. Earlier today, I convened this year’s first high-level national security meeting. I will now report on the discussions from the meeting to all citizens. 2025 is a year full of challenges, but also a year full of hope. In today’s global landscape, the democratic world faces common threats posed by the convergence of authoritarian regimes, while dumping and unfair competition from China undermine the global economic order. A new United States administration was formed at the beginning of the year, adopting all-new strategies and policies to address challenges both domestic and from overseas. Every nation worldwide, including ours, is facing a new phase of changes and challenges. In face of such changes, ensuring national security, ensuring Taiwan’s indispensability in global supply chains, and ensuring that our nation continues to make progress amidst challenges are our top priorities this year. They are also why we convened a high-level national security meeting today. At the meeting, the national security team, the administrative team led by Premier Cho, and I held an in-depth discussion based on the overall state of affairs at home and abroad and the strategies the teams had prepared in response. We summed up the following points as an overall strategy for the next stage of advancing national security and development. First, for overall national security, so that we can ensure the freedom, democracy, and human rights of the Taiwanese people, as well as the progress and development of the nation as we face various threats from authoritarian regimes, Taiwan must resolutely safeguard national sovereignty, strengthen self-sufficiency in national defense, and consolidate national defense. Taiwan must enhance economic resilience, maintain economic autonomy, and stand firm with other democracies as we deepen our strategic partnerships with like-minded countries. As I have said, “As authoritarianism consolidates, democratic nations must come closer in solidarity!” And so, in this new year, we will focus on the following three priorities: First, to demonstrate our resolve for national defense, we will continue to reform national defense, implement whole-of-society defense resilience, and prioritize special budget allocations to ensure that our defense budget exceeds 3 percent of GDP. Second, to counter the threats to our national security from China’s united front tactics, attempts at infiltration, and cognitive warfare, we will continue with the reform of our legal framework for national security and expand the national security framework to boost societal resilience and foster unity within. Third, to seize opportunities in the restructuring of global supply chains and realignment of the economic order, we will continue advancing our economic and trade strategy of being rooted in Taiwan while expanding globally, strengthening protections for high-tech, and collaborating with our friends and allies to build supply chains for global democracies. Everyone shares concern regarding Taiwan-US relations, semiconductor industry development, and cross-strait relations. For these issues, I am proposing clear-cut national strategies. First, I will touch on Taiwan-US relations. Taiwan and the US have shared ideals and values, and are staunch partners within the democratic, free community. We are very grateful to President Donald Trump’s administration for their continued support for Taiwan after taking office. We are especially grateful for the US and Japan’s joint leaders’ statement reiterating “the importance of maintaining peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait as an indispensable element of security and prosperity for the international community,” as well as their high level of concern regarding China’s threat to regional security. In fact, the Democratic Progressive Party government has worked very closely with President Trump ever since his first term in office, and has remained an international partner. The procurement of numerous key advanced arms, freedom of navigation critical for security and stability in the Taiwan Strait, and many assisted breakthroughs in international diplomacy were made possible during this time. Positioned in the first island chain and on the democratic world’s frontline countering authoritarianism, Taiwan is willing and will continue to work with the US at all levels as we pursue regional stability and prosperity, helping realize our vision of a free and open Indo-Pacific. Although changes in policy may occur these next few years, the mutual trust and close cooperation between Taiwan and Washington will steadfastly endure. On that, our citizens can rest assured. In accordance with the Taiwan Relations Act and the Six Assurances, the US announced a total of 48 military sales to Taiwan over the past eight years amounting to US$26.265 billion. During President Trump’s first term, 22 sales were announced totaling US$18.763 billion. This greatly supported Taiwan’s defensive capabilities. On the foundation of our close cooperation with the past eight years’ two US administrations, Taiwan will continue to demonstrate our determination for self-defense, accelerate the bolstering of our national defense, and keep enhancing the depth and breadth of Taiwan-US security cooperation, along with all manner of institutional cooperation. In terms of bilateral economic cooperation, Taiwan has always been one of the US’s most reliable trade partners, as well as one of the most important cooperative partners of US companies in the global semiconductor industry. In the past few years, Taiwan has greatly increased both direct and indirect investment in the US. By 2024, investment surpassed US$100 billion, creating nearly 400,000 job opportunities. In 2023 and 2024, investment in the US accounted for over 40 percent of Taiwan’s overall foreign investment, far surpassing our investment in China. In fact, in 2023 and 2024, Taiwanese investment in China fell to 11 percent and 8 percent, respectively. The US is now Taiwan’s biggest investment target. Our government is now launching relevant plans in accordance with national development needs and the need to establish secure supply systems, and the Executive Yuan is taking comprehensive inventory of opportunities for Taiwan-US economic and trade cooperation. Moving forward, close bilateral cooperation will allow us to expand US investment and procurement, facilitating balanced trade. Our government will also strengthen guidance and support for Taiwanese enterprises on increasing US investment, and promote the global expansion and growth of Taiwan’s industries. We will also boost Taiwan-US cooperation in tech development and manufacturing for AI and advanced semiconductors, and work together to maintain order in the semiconductor market, shaping a new era for our strategic economic partnership. Second, the development of our semiconductor industry. I want to emphasize that Taiwan, as one of the world’s most capable semiconductor manufacturing nations, is both willing and able to address new situations. With respect to President Trump’s concerns about our semiconductor industry, the government will act prudently, strengthen communications between Taiwan and the US, and promote greater mutual understanding. We will pay attention to the challenges arising from the situation and assist businesses in navigating them. In addition, we will introduce an initiative on semiconductor supply chain partnerships for global democracies. We are willing to collaborate with the US and our other democratic partners to develop more resilient and diversified semiconductor supply chains. Leveraging our strengths in cutting-edge semiconductors, we will form a global alliance for the AI chip industry and establish democratic supply chains for industries connected to high-end chips. Through international cooperation, we will open up an entirely new era of growth in the semiconductor industry. As we face the various new policies of the Trump administration, we will continue to uphold a spirit of mutual benefit, and we will continue to communicate and negotiate closely with the US government. This will help the new administration’s team to better understand how Taiwan is an indispensable partner in the process of rebuilding American manufacturing and consolidating its leadership in high-tech, and that Taiwan-US cooperation will benefit us both. Third, cross-strait relations. Regarding the regional and cross-strait situation, Taiwan-US relations, US-China relations, and interactions among Taiwan, the US, and China are a focus of global attention. As a member of the international democratic community and a responsible member of the region, Taiwan hopes to see Taiwan-US relations continue to strengthen and, alongside US-China relations, form a virtuous cycle rather than a zero-sum game where one side’s gain is another side’s loss. In facing China, Taiwan will always be a responsible actor. We will neither yield nor provoke. We will remain resilient and composed, maintaining our consistent position on cross-strait relations: Our determination to safeguard our national sovereignty and protect our free and democratic way of life remains unchanged. Our efforts to maintain peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait, as well as our willingness to work alongside China in the pursuit of peace and mutual prosperity across the strait, remain unchanged. Our commitment to promoting healthy and orderly exchanges across the strait, choosing dialogue over confrontation, and advancing well-being for the peoples on both sides of the strait, under the principles of parity and dignity, remains unchanged. Regarding the matters I reported to the public today, I have instructed our national security and administrative teams to take swift action and deliver results, working within a stable strategic framework and according to the various policies and approaches I just outlined. I have also instructed them to keep a close watch on changes in the international situation, seize opportunities whenever they arise, and address the concerns and hope of the citizens with concrete actions. My fellow citizens, over the past several years, Taiwan has weathered a global pandemic and faced global challenges, both political and economic, arising from the US-China trade war and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Through it all, Taiwan has persevered; we have continued to develop our economy, bolster our national strength, and raise our international profile while garnering more support – all unprecedented achievements. This is all because Taiwan’s fate has never been decided by the external environment, but by the unity of the Taiwanese people and the resolve to never give up. A one-of-a-kind global situation is creating new strategic opportunities for our one-of-a-kind Taiwanese people, bringing new hope. Taiwan’s foundation is solid; its strength is great. So as long as everyone remains steadfast in their convictions, is willing to work hand in hand, stands firm amidst uncertainty, and looks for ways to win within changing circumstances, Taiwan is certain to prevail in the test of our time yet again, for I am confident that there are no difficulties that Taiwan cannot overcome. Thank you.

    Details
    2025-01-01
    President Lai delivers 2025 New Year’s Address
    On the morning of January 1, President Lai Ching-te delivered his 2025 New Year’s Address, titled “Bolstering National Strength through Democracy to Enter a New Global Landscape,” in the Reception Hall of the Presidential Office. President Lai stated that today’s Taiwan is receiving international recognition for its performance in many areas, among them democracy, technology, and economy. In this new year, he said, Taiwan must be united, and we must continue on the right course. The president expressed hope that everyone in the central and local governments, regardless of party, can work hard together, allowing Taiwan sure footing as it strides forward toward ever greater achievements.  President Lai emphasized that in 2025, we must keep firm on the path of democracy, continue to bolster our national strength, make Taiwan more economically resilient, enhance the resilience of supply chains for global democracies, and continue working toward a Balanced Taiwan and generational justice, ensuring that the fruits of our economic growth can be enjoyed by all our people. The president said that Taiwan will keep going strong, and we will keep walking tall as we enter the new global landscape. A translation of President Lai’s address follows: Today is the first day of 2025. With a new year comes new beginnings. I wish that Taiwan enjoys peace, prosperity, and success, and that our people lead happy lives. Taiwan truly finished 2024 strong. Though there were many challenges, there were also many triumphs. We withstood earthquakes and typhoons, and stood firm in the face of constant challenges posed by authoritarianism. We also shared glory as Taiwan won the Premier12 baseball championship, and now Taiwanese people around the world are all familiar with the gesture for Team Taiwan. At the Paris Olympics, Wang Chi-lin (王齊麟) and Lee Yang (李洋) clinched another gold in men’s doubles badminton. Lin Yu-ting (林郁婷) took home Taiwan’s first Olympic gold in boxing. At the International Junior Science Olympiad, every student in our delegation of six won a gold medal. And Yang Shuang-zi’s (楊双子) novel Taiwan Travelogue, translated into English by King Lin (金翎), became a United States National Book Award winner and a tour de force of Taiwan literature on the international level. Our heroes of Taiwan are defined by neither age nor discipline. They have taken home top prizes at international competitions and set new records. They tell Taiwan’s story through their outstanding performances, letting the world see the spirit and culture of Taiwan, and filling all our citizens with pride. My fellow citizens, we have stood together through thick and thin; we have shared our ups and downs. We have wept together, and we have laughed together. We are all one family, all members of Team Taiwan. I want to thank each of our citizens for their dedication, fueling Taiwan’s progress and bringing our nation glory. You have given Taiwan even greater strength to stand out on the global stage. In this new year, we must continue bringing Taiwan’s stories to the world, and make Taiwan’s successes a force for global progress. In 2025, the world will be entering a new landscape. Last year, over 70 countries held elections, and the will of the people has changed with the times. As many countries turn new pages politically, and in the midst of rapid international developments, Taiwan must continue marching forward with steady strides. First, we must keep firm on the path of democracy. Taiwan made it through a dark age of authoritarianism and has since become a glorious beacon of democracy in Asia. This was achieved through the sacrifices of our democratic forebears and the joint efforts of all our citizens. Democracy’s value to Taiwan lies not just in our free way of life, or in the force driving the diverse and vigorous growth of our society. Democracy is the brand that has earned us international trust in terms of diplomacy. No matter the threat or challenge Taiwan may face, democracy is Taiwan’s only path forward. We will not turn back. Domestic competition among political parties is a part of democracy. But domestic political disputes must be resolved democratically, within the constitutional system. This is the only way democracy can continue to grow. The Executive Yuan has the right to request a reconsideration of the controversial bills passed in the Legislative Yuan, giving it room for reexamination. Constitutional institutions can also lodge a petition for a constitutional interpretation, and through Constitutional Court adjudication, ensure a separation of powers, safeguard constitutional order, and gradually consolidate the constitutional system. The people also have the right of election, recall, initiative, and referendum, and can bring together even greater democratic power to show the true meaning of sovereignty in the hands of the people. In this new year, the changing international landscape will present democratic nations around the world with many grave challenges. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and conflict between Israel and Hamas rage on, and we are seeing the continued convergence of authoritarian regimes including China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran, threatening the rules-based international order and severely affecting peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region and the world at large. Peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait are essential components for global security and prosperity. Taiwan needs to prepare for danger in times of peace. We must continue increasing our national defense budget, bolster our national defense capabilities, and show our determination to protect our country. Everyone has a responsibility to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy and security. We must gather together every bit of strength we have to enhance whole-of-society defense resilience, and build capabilities to respond to major disasters and deter threats or encroachment. We must also strengthen communication with society to combat information and cognitive warfare, so that the populace rejects threats and enticements and jointly guards against malicious infiltration by external forces. Here at home, we must consolidate democracy with democracy. Internationally, we must make friends worldwide through democracy. This is how we will ensure security and peace. The more secure Taiwan, the more secure the world. The more resilient Taiwan, the sounder the defense of global democracy. The global democratic community should work even closer together to support the democratic umbrella as we seek ways to resolve the war in Ukraine and conflict between Israel and Hamas. Together, we must uphold stability in the Taiwan Strait and security in the Indo-Pacific, and achieve our goal of global peace. Second, we must continue to bolster our national strength, make Taiwan more economically resilient, and enhance the resilience of supply chains for global democracies. In the first half of 2024, growth in the Taiwan Stock Index was the highest in the world. Our economic growth rate for the year as a whole is expected to reach 4.2 percent, leading among the Four Asian Tigers. Domestic investment is soaring, having exceeded NT$5 trillion, and inflation is gradually stabilizing. Export orders from January to November totaled US$536.6 billion, up 3.7 percent from the same period in 2023. And compared over the same period, exports saw a 9.9 percent increase, reaching US$431.5 billion. Recent surveys also show that in 2024, the average increase in salaries at companies was higher than that in 2023. Additionally, over 90 percent of companies plan to raise salaries this year, which is an eight-year high. All signs indicate that Taiwan’s economic climate continues to recover, and that our economy is growing steadily. Our overall economic performance is impressive; still, we must continue to pay attention to the impact on Taiwan’s industries from the changing geopolitical landscape, uncertainties in the global economic environment, and dumping by the “red supply chain.”  For a nation, all sectors and professions are equally important; only when all our industries are strong can Taiwan be strong as a nation. Our micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs) are the lifeblood of Taiwan, and the development of our various industrial parks has given Taiwan the impetus for our prosperity. We must carry the spirit of “Made in Taiwan” forward, bringing it to ever greater heights. Thus, beyond just developing our high-tech industry, our Executive Yuan has already proposed a solution that will help traditional industries and MSMEs comprehensively adopt technology applications, engage in the digital and net-zero twin transition, and develop channels, all for better operational structures and higher productivity. Taiwan must continue enhancing its economic resilience. In recent years, Taiwan has significantly increased its investments in the US, Japan, Europe, and the New Southbound countries, and such investment has already surpassed investment in China. This indicates that our efforts in diversifying markets and reducing reliance on any single market are working. Moving forward, we must keep providing assistance so that Taiwan industries can expand their global presence and market internationally from a solid base here in Taiwan. At the same time, Taiwan must use democracy to promote economic growth with the rest of the world. We must leverage our strengths in the semiconductor and AI industries. We must link with democratic countries so that we can together enhance the resilience of supply chains for global democracies. And through international cooperation across many sectors, such as UAVs, low-orbit communications satellites, robots, military, security and surveillance, or biopharmaceuticals, renewable energy technology, new agriculture, and the circular economy, we must keep abreast of the latest cutting-edge technology and promote diverse development. This approach will help Taiwan remain a leader in advancing global democratic supply chains, ensuring their security and stability. Third, we must continue working toward a Balanced Taiwan and generational justice, ensuring that the fruits of our economic growth can be enjoyed by all our people. Democracy means the people have the final say. Our nation belongs to all 23 million of us, without regard for ethnic group, generation, political party, or whether we live in urban or rural areas. In this new year, we must continue to pursue policies that promote the well-being of the nation and the people. But to that end, the central government needs adequate financial resources to ensure that it can enact each of these measures. Therefore, I hope that the ruling and opposition parties can each soberly reconsider the amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures and find a path forward that ensures the lasting peace and stability of our country. For nine consecutive years, the minimum wage has continued to rise. Effective today, the minimum monthly salary is being raised from NT$27,470 to NT$28,590, and the hourly salary from NT$183 to NT$190. We hope by raising the pay for military personnel, civil servants, and educators for two consecutive years, coupled with benefits through wage increases and tax reductions, that private businesses will also raise wages, allowing all our people to enjoy the fruits of our economic growth. I know that everyone wants to pay lower taxes and rent. This year, we will continue to promote tax reductions. For example, unmarried individuals with an annual income of NT$446,000 or less can be exempt from paying income tax. Dual-income families with an annual income of NT$892,000 or less and dual-income families with two children aged six or younger with an annual income of NT$1,461,000 or less are also exempt from paying income tax. Additionally, the number of rent-subsidized housing units will also be increased, from 500,000 to 750,000 units, helping lighten the load for everyone. This year, the age eligibility for claiming Culture Points has been lowered from 16 to 13 years, so that now young people aged between 13 and 22 can receive government support for experiencing more in the arts. Also, our Taiwan Global Pathfinders Initiative is about to take effect, which will help more young people in Taiwan realize their dreams by taking part in education and exchange activities in many places around the world. We are also in the process of establishing a sports ministry to help young athletes achieve their dreams on the field, court, and beyond. The ministry will also be active in developing various sports industries and bringing sports and athletics more into the lives of the people, making our people healthier as a result. This year, as Taiwan becomes a “super-aged society,” we will launch our Long-term Care 3.0 Plan to provide better all-around care for our seniors. And we will expand the scope of cancer screening eligibility and services, all aimed at creating a Healthy Taiwan. In addition, Taiwan will officially begin collecting fees for its carbon fee system today. This brings us closer in line with global practices and helps us along the path to our goal of net-zero emissions by 2050. We will also continue on the path to achieving a Balanced Taiwan. Last month, the Executive Yuan launched the Trillion NT Dollar Investment National Development Plan and its six major regional flagship projects. Both of these initiatives will continue to expand the investment in our public infrastructure and the development of local specialty industries, narrowing urban-rural and wealth gaps so that all our people can live and work in peace and happiness. My fellow citizens, today’s Taiwan is receiving international recognition for its performance in many areas, among them democracy, technology, and economy. This tells us that national development is moving in the right direction. In this new year, Taiwan must be united, and we must continue on the right course. We hope that everyone in the central and local governments, regardless of party, can work hard together to ensure that national policies are successfully implemented, with the people’s well-being as our top priority. This will allow Taiwan sure footing as it strides forward toward ever greater achievements. In this new year, we have many more brilliant stories of Taiwan to share with the world, inspiring all Taiwanese, both here and around the world, to cheer time and again for the glory of Taiwan. Taiwan will keep going strong. And we will keep walking tall as we enter the new global landscape. Thank you.

    Details
    2025-05-20
    President Lai delivers address on first anniversary of taking office  
    On the morning of May 20, President Lai Ching-te delivered an address on the first anniversary of his taking office. In his address, the president stated that the Taiwan of today is a Taiwan of the world, and whether it is global technological development, divisions of labor within international supply chains, worldwide economic and trade exchanges, or regional security matters, Taiwan plays a pivotal and indispensable role. He said that, looking forward, we will not cower in the face of challenges; rather, we will bravely march forward into the future. We will maintain solidarity, he emphasized, and with our resilience, perseverance, and enthusiasm as Taiwanese, forge ahead with transition, steadily and solidly.  President Lai stated that moving forward, the government will set up a fund to boost Taiwan’s economic momentum. He also stated that he will be instructing the national security team to initiate a major national security briefing for the chairs of opposition parties, in the hope that leaders of all parties can prioritize our nation’s interests and uphold our nation’s security so that we can tackle our nation’s challenges side by side. A translation of President Lai’s address follows: Yesterday, outside of Beida Elementary School in New Taipei City’s Sanxia District, there was a major traffic accident that, sadly, claimed several lives and resulted in multiple injuries. The Executive Yuan immediately formed a task force, and last night I personally visited the victims in hospital. Central government agencies and the local government will cooperate to provide assistance to the victims’ families. They will work as quickly as possible to determine the cause of the accident and assess areas for improvement, so as to prevent reoccurrence of accidents like this. Today, let me express my deepest condolences to the bereaved families for the unfortunate loss of life and my hope for the quick and full recovery of those injured. The purpose of government is to serve the people. I want to thank the people of Taiwan for entrusting me, one year ago today, with the responsibility of leading the nation bravely forward. I want to thank all my fellow citizens for working hand in hand with the government over this past year. Together, we have overcome numerous challenges to ensure that our nation will keep moving forward.  As we face three major challenges that receive international attention and create the largest impact on our citizens: climate change, the promotion of health, and social resilience, I decided to establish three committees at the Presidential Office. In each committee, we have thus far seen incremental progress. We are working to align ourselves with international standards. The voluntary bottom-up plans of different government agencies plus the top-down approach of the Executive Yuan National Council for Sustainable Development’s Net Zero Emissions Transition Taskforce have produced 20 flagship carbon reduction projects for six major sectors. The government is expected to continue to inject over NT$1 trillion in the budget for the net-zero transition by 2030; and we expect to spur at least NT$5 trillion in private green investment and financing as we work toward the new 2035 NDC target for emissions reductions of 38±2 percent. Taiwan’s air quality has been steadily improving. From 2015 to today, the annual average PM2.5 concentration has dropped from 21.82 to 12.8 μg/m3. Taiwan officially began collecting fees for its carbon fee system this year. With firm resolve, a steady pace, and flexible strategies, we will work to realize the vision of net-zero transition by 2050; and together with the world we will pursue sustainable growth and prosperous development. To address the challenges in the post-pandemic world, we are establishing a national center for disease prevention and control, strengthening our central pandemic response. To promote health for all, we are promoting cancer screening, establishing a fund for new cancer drugs, and launching the five-year, NT$48.9 billion Healthy Taiwan Cultivation Plan. This year, we significantly increased the total National Health Insurance budget by NT$71.2 billion to achieve sustainable NHI development. We aim to create a Healthy Taiwan, keeping people healthy and making the nation stronger so that the world embraces Taiwan. We are also hard at work to enhance our whole-of-society defense resilience. In addition to continuing to assess various aspects of preparedness at the national level and conduct field verification, we have concerted the efforts of various ministries to propose 17 major strategies to respond to national security and united front threats, uniting our people to resist division and protecting our cherished free and democratic way of life. Recently, the Executive Yuan made special budget allocations of NT$410 billion, of which NT$150 billion is aimed to enhance national resilience. On this, we look forward to mutual support from the ruling and opposition parties. As our nation continues on the path forward, challenges and obstacles will continue to emerge. Early last month, the United States announced its new tariff policy, and in response I proposed five major strategies. I also launched industry listening tours, with the aim of working alongside industries to overcome challenges and open up new opportunities. The Executive Yuan is also soliciting opinions from all sectors as quickly as possible to put forward a special act to enhance the resilience of Taiwan’s national security. The annual surplus will be utilized in the special budget allocations totaling NT$410 billion to not only support industries and stabilize employment, but also strengthen the economy, protect people’s livelihoods, enhance resilience in homeland security, and ensure that Taiwan’s industries continue to steadily advance amidst changing circumstances. Notably, in our discussions across different industries, all sectors advocated against raising electricity prices and were in support of government subsidies for Taiwan Power Company. These would offset Taipower’s losses from subsidies to support people’s livelihoods and for industrial electricity usage since the COVID-19 pandemic and Russo-Ukrainian War, both strengthening its finances and stabilizing electricity prices. We look forward to cooperation among the ruling and opposition parties to pass the Executive Yuan’s special budget. All sectors hope to maintain a stable power supply. As energy security is national security, ensuring a stable power supply while developing more forms of green energy is, whether now or in the future, one of the government’s most important tasks. Aside from the issue of electricity prices, the Taiwanese people have also been closely following the recent Taiwan-US tariff negotiations. The first round of in-person talks have concluded, and tariff negotiations are currently still going smoothly. The government will uphold the principles of ensuring national interests and safeguarding industry development, under no circumstances sacrificing any one sector. We will stand firm on Taiwan’s position and, from the basis of deepening Taiwan-US economic and trade relations, strive for optimal negotiation results in a well-paced, balanced manner. Taiwan shares democratic values with our democratic partners around the world. When combined with our adherence to free market principles to foster mutual prosperity, those values are our greatest assets. They form a protective umbrella that allows Taiwanese businesses to unleash their vitality and energy. They are also the most significant mark of distinction between us and authoritarian regimes. For many years now, Taiwan, the US, and our democratic partners have actively engaged in exchange and cooperation, spurring mutual growth. Among friends, there is always some friction; but that friction is always resolvable. Just as it says in the Bible, “As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.” Through mutual exchange, friends can smooth out their shortcomings and further hone their strengths. Even when differences arise, so long as there is a foundation built on trust and honest dialogue, friends can better understand one another and further deepen their bonds. Now, Taiwan’s market is global; its stage is international. Going forward, we will hold firm to our democratic values and expand into diverse markets. First, Taiwan’s economic path is clearly established. Taking a market-oriented approach, we will promote an economic path of staying firmly rooted in Taiwan and expanding the global presence of our enterprises while strengthening ties with the US. In recent years, Taiwan has updated investment protection agreements with such countries as the Philippines, India, Vietnam, and Thailand, and signed a foreign investment promotion and protection arrangement with Canada. Moving forward, we will endeavor to sign investment protection agreements and double taxation avoidance agreements with our friends and allies. Second, Taiwan’s trade strategy is clearly defined. We will extend our market connections with the US and other free, democratic nations, expanding our presence worldwide. To that end, we have completed the signing of the first agreement under the Taiwan-US Initiative on 21st-Century Trade and signed an enhanced trade partnership arrangement with the United Kingdom. We are in active negotiations on trade agreements with other countries, and we continue to seek admission to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership and other mechanisms for regional economic integration. Third, we must ensure that Taiwan’s economy is export-led while expanding domestic demand, concurrently prioritizing strong technological R&D and upgraded traditional industries, and boosting software development, production, and manufacturing. We must also continue tapping into Taiwan’s strengths to attract international firms here to invest and collaborate. In just the past few years, Entegris opened a new manufacturing facility in Kaohsiung, Micron launched a new facility in Taichung, and Google further solidified Taiwan as its biggest R&D hub outside of the US by opening a new office here. AMD, Nvidia, and major cloud computing companies from the US have also been expanding their presence here. And yesterday, Nvidia even announced that it will establish an overseas headquarters in Taiwan. Through such collaboration across borders, we are introducing advanced technology from overseas and engaging in international R&D. We will build Taiwan into an even more resilient economy. Moving forward, the government will set up a fund to boost Taiwan’s economic momentum. With our sights set on the whole globe, we will invest in international markets, while the government will also set up a sovereign wealth fund and build a national-level investment platform. We will make full use of Taiwan’s industrial advantages and, with the government taking the lead and synergizing private-sector enterprises, expand our global presence and link with major target markets of the AI era. Domestically, we will bolster local supply chains and strengthen industries’ ability to adapt to changing circumstances. The government will enhance the functions of the National Development Fund to achieve industrial restructuring and assist domestic industries and small- and medium-sized enterprises with upgrading and transformation, raising international competitiveness and consolidating domestic industry foundations. My fellow citizens, our market and our values are defined by democracy. Democracy is also a display of our national strength. Taiwan was once the country with the world’s longest martial law period, but now, we are a beacon for democracy in Asia. Our past generations, through valiant sacrifice and devotion, bravely resisted authoritarianism and pursued democracy. Today’s younger generations are able to proactively engage in politics, protect the nation, further entrench democracy, and strive for a diverse Taiwan through all manner of constitutional and legal means, without fear of difficulty. This is the democratic Taiwan we take pride in. I am confident that no one Taiwanese would give up their free and democratic way of life. And no president can abandon the values of freedom and democracy. On the path of democracy, Taiwan never relied on the mobilization of hate; rather, it relied on the participation and coming together of citizens. We do not fear differences in opinion because the core of democracy is about finding, within difference, unity. I have always believed that democratic disputes are resolved through greater exercise of democracy. Over the past year, despite the domestic political situation, ruling and opposition parties formed a delegation to attend the inaugural ceremonies of the president and vice president of the US, demonstrating that democratic Taiwan stands united for deepening Taiwan-US ties. I also, in accordance with the powers granted me by the Constitution, convened a national policy meeting with the heads of the five branches of government, with the hope of achieving reconciliation and encouraging cooperation. I have always been willing, with open arms, to work hard for cross-party dialogue and strengthened cooperation among our political parties. That is why I will be instructing our national security team to initiate a major national security briefing for the chairs of opposition parties. It is hoped that leaders of all parties, regardless of political stance, can prioritize our nation’s interests and uphold our nation’s security; and grounded in shared facts, we can openly and honestly exchange views and discuss matters of national importance, so that we can tackle our nation’s challenges side by side. Later today is the opening ceremony of COMPUTEX TAIPEI, an event that will be closely followed in the international community. Taiwan, as the world’s silicon island, is a central pillar in the global economy and the field of AI, and this event will therefore attract important tech industry figures from around the world. Once a small-scale expo initially held near Taipei’s Songshan Airport, COMPUTEX has continued to grow in scale over the past 40-plus years, and now marks an important milestone in the development of global technological innovation. COMPUTEX is a microcosm of the Taiwan story, an achievement that the people of Taiwan share. The Taiwan of today is a Taiwan of the world. Whether it is global technological development, divisions of labor within international supply chains, worldwide economic and trade exchanges, or regional security matters, Taiwan plays a pivotal and indispensable role. My fellow citizens, we do not cower in the face of challenges; rather, we bravely march forward into the future. As the saying goes, success is 30 percent destiny and 70 percent hard work. We will maintain solidarity, and with our resilience, perseverance, and enthusiasm as Taiwanese, forge ahead with transition, steadily and solidly. That is the spirit of us Taiwanese. We will keep working together in solidarity and meet challenges with firm strides, making Taiwan a global beacon, a pilot for world peace, and a force for global prosperity. Thank you.  

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Science and Nature in Full Bloom at Floriade 2025

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    As part of ACT Government’s ‘One Government, One Voice’ program, we are transitioning this website across to our . You can access everything you need through this website while it’s happening.

    Released 20/05/2025

    Australia’s biggest celebration of spring returns to Commonwealth Park from Saturday 13 September to Sunday 12 October 2025, with Floriade 2025 set to be an immersive and inspiring journey through the theme Science and Nature.

    Now in its 38th year, Floriade continues to grow in scale and imagination, celebrating the powerful connections between scientific discovery and the natural world. Visitors will explore stunning garden bed displays inspired by disciplines including physics, chemistry, astronomy, biology, and botany. Transforming Commonwealth Park into a vibrant, living classroom.

    Chief Minister Andrew Barr highlighted the significance of the event, “Floriade is a major economic driver for our city and a celebration of spring and nature. This year’s theme, Science and Nature, highlights Canberra’s identity as a hub of innovation and discovery.”

    “Floriade is a major drawcard in Canberra’s events calendar. In 2024, the festival attracted over 470,000 visitors and delivered a total expenditure impact of more than $62 million, highlighting its importance to our city’s visitor economy.”

    “This year we welcome Allhomes as Floriade’s new Presenting Partner in 2025. This collaboration will help support a dynamic program that spans science, nature, and culture.

    We look forward to working with them to enhance the Floriade experience for our community and for visitors from interstate and beyond.”

    Allhomes, a trusted name in Canberra’s property market, joins as Presenting Partner in 2025, reflecting a shared commitment to community and growth.

    With support from Inspiring Australia and the Horticultural Society of Canberra, Floriade 2025 will offer hands-on exhibits, expert speakers, and workshops that showcase the intersection of horticulture and science. The program also features live entertainment, music, food and wine, market stalls, and cultural events ensuring something for all ages.

    Key program highlights include:

    • NightFest (2–5 October): Four dazzling nights of after-dark entertainment, illuminated garden displays, food stalls, and live performances from 6:30pm to 10:30pm. Tickets on sale from 21 July 2025.
    • Windows to the World at Floriade (11 October): A cultural showcase with traditional dress, music, dance, global cuisine, and coffee ahead of the larger Windows to the World weekend (18–19 October).
    • Dogs’ Day Out (12 October): A crowd favourite returns on Floriade’s final day, where visitors can enjoy the blooms with their four-legged companions.
    • Great Big Bulb Dig (13 October): Take home a piece of Floriade and support local charities as the festival wraps up for the season.

    The impact of Floriade goes far beyond Commonwealth Park. Floriade Community, supported by Icon Water, has again distributed more than 300,000 bulbs and annuals to over 100 schools, retirement villages, community centres, and local organisations across Canberra.

    Meanwhile, Lanyon Homestead will feature as a satellite site with guided tours and a special garden installation.

    Floriade About Town invites local businesses, cafes, and cultural institutions to join the celebration with themed promotions and citywide events.

    Entry to Floriade is free, with gates open daily from 9:30am to 5:30pm.

    For more information, visit floriadeaustralia.com

    – Statement ends –

    Andrew Barr, MLA | Media Releases

    «ACT Government Media Releases | «Minister Media Releases

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI China: China-LatAm trade set to skyrocket

    Source: People’s Republic of China – State Council News

    An electric and combustion dual-power train manufactured in China awaits departure at Central Station in Santiago, Chile. [Photo/Xinhua]

    The steady advancement of the Belt and Road Initiative, coupled with a growing network of bilateral free trade agreements, will unlock fresh potential for trade and investment ties between China and Latin America in the years ahead, said market watchers and exporters on Monday.

    As infrastructure connectivity improves under the BRI through enhanced port facilities, logistics networks and digital trade corridors, they said regional integration is advancing, reducing transportation costs and expanding access to global markets.

    Although several countries are facing challenges posed by protectionism and unilateralism, high-standard free trade agreements, such as the China-Chile FTA, China-Ecuador FTA and China-Costa Rica FTA, will serve as benchmarks for future economic partnerships, promoting rules-based trade, intellectual property protection and sustainable development practices, said Wang Qian, a researcher specializing in international trade at Shanghai University of International Business and Economics.

    As China continues to expand its high-standard opening-up, and Latin American countries pursue diversification strategies, the evolving bilateral framework will not only deepen economic interdependence but also foster inclusive growth and shared prosperity across both sides, said Wang.

    China is currently negotiating upgrades to the China-Peru FTA and discussing new FTAs with Panama and Honduras. Additionally, the nation has conducted a feasibility study on a China-Colombia FTA, aiming to strengthen bilateral trade and economic cooperation, according to information released by the Ministry of Commerce.

    Sun Yanfeng, a researcher specializing in Latin American studies at the Beijing-based China Institutes of Contemporary International Relations, said that the complementary nature of the two sides’ economies further amplifies the potential for deeper cooperation.

    Latin America’s abundant natural resources and agricultural output align seamlessly with China’s manufacturing prowess and vast consumer market, creating robust trade synergies, said Sun.

    “Chinese companies, such as BYD, China General Nuclear Power Corp and China COSCO Shipping Corp, are also increasingly investing in sectors such as renewable energy, manufacturing, transportation, mining and agribusiness across Latin America, bringing capital, technology and know-how to local economies,” he added.

    China’s direct investment flow to Latin America totaled $14.71 billion in 2024. During the first quarter of 2025, Chinese investment in the region reached $270 million. As of March 2025, Latin American countries had established a total of 37,000 businesses in China, data from the Ministry of Commerce showed.

    China-Latin America trade volume reached a record high of $518.47 billion in 2024, up 6 percent year-on-year. Their total trade value stood at $162.21 billion between January and April, said the General Administration of Customs.

    Changzhou Samkit Electric Co Ltd, a Changzhou, Jiangsu province-based home appliance manufacturer, shipped 1.15 million yuan ($159,420) worth of smart vacuum cleaners to Brazil earlier this month and will participate in more trade shows in Latin America in the second half of this year, according to Nanjing Customs.

    “Shifting our focus from a single market — primarily the United States — to emerging markets like Brazil will be our most important transformation this year,” said Qiu Riju, the company’s general manager.

    Chaoyang Jinda Molybdenum Co Ltd, a ferromolybdenum and molybdenum oxide manufacturer based in Chaoyang, Liaoning province, saw its exports soar 19 percent on a yearly basis to 260 million yuan in the first four months, with Latin American economies serving as the primary destinations, according to Shenyang Customs.

    “Driven by rapid urbanization and industrialization, Latin American countries such as Peru and Chile have seen a sharp rise in demand for our products in recent years,” said Li Jinling, vice-president of the company.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Supporting more ‘missing middle’ homes in Canberra’s suburbs

    Source: Australian National Party

    As part of ACT Government’s ‘One Government, One Voice’ program, we are transitioning this website across to our . You can access everything you need through this website while it’s happening.

    Released 20/05/2025

    The ACT Government is enabling more low-rise ‘missing middle’ homes in Canberra’s existing suburbs to support our target of 30,000 new homes by 2030. 

    “We want to provide more homes for Canberrans where they want to live, and that means making sure we’ve got the right policies in place to deliver more housing choice in Canberra’s existing suburbs,” said Minister for Planning and Sustainable Development Chris Steel. 

    “This design led approach to changes in our planning system will make sure we can keep what we love about our suburbs, while providing more homes across our city. 

    “We understand there is strong demand for moderately sized homes with a garden, that will meet the needs of our growing and changing community. 

    “This reform is about providing more low-rise homes for first home buyers, growing families, and those who want to age in place in the communities that they love.

    “Right now Canberra is characterised by single dwelling detached homes in the suburbs and high rise apartments in our town centres, without much housing stock in-between. 

    “These ‘missing middle’ housing reforms will permit low-rise multi-occupancy homes (2-3+ homes on a block), townhouses, terrace homes and low-rise apartments in existing RZ1 and RZ2 zoned residential areas.

    “I encourage everyone to have their say on the new design guide and the draft Major Plan Amendment and take part in shaping well-designed and sustainable housing options for our suburbs that meet the needs for current and future residents.”

    ‘Missing Middle’ Housing Design Guide 

    Canberrans are invited to have their say on the new ‘missing middle’ housing design guide, which is the foundational document that will be used by industry to guide the types of housing that could be built under the changes.

    It will be a requirement for proposed missing middle housing development in RZ1 and RZ2 zones to respond to the design guide. The guide focuses on how we can include this type of housing, whilst maintaining the things we love about living in Canberra’s streets and suburbs. 

    The draft design guide has been developed by architects and industry professionals to make sure its outcomes are achievable and supportive of delivering more types of housing in all suburbs in the ACT. 

    Major Plan Amendment

    Changes to suburban zoning and new design requirements will deliver an increased supply of high quality and sustainable missing middle housing types across our city. 

    This amendment to the Territory Plan changes what is allowed to be built in different residential zones in the ACT and removes barriers to developing these different housing types. 

    It will support delivery of these homes in existing suburbs and make sure that this is reflected in Canberra’s planning laws. 

    Changes include removal of minimum block sizes for additional dwellings in RZ1 areas, removing the 120m2 limit for a secondary dwelling, allowing block subdivisions, as well as permitting townhouses, terraces and low-rise apartments to be built up to two storeys.

    Block consolidation will also allow us to make better use of land and have more types of ‘missing middle’ housing delivered across the ACT, with this flexibility helping to achieve higher quality design outcomes.

    Canopy cover requirements are proposed to increase from 15% to 20%, with site coverage requirements for the homes built across a block to remain at 45%. 

    To have your say on the Missing Middle Housing Design Guide and the draft Major Plan Amendment, go to the YourSay Conversations website. Consultation closes 22 July. Long form submissions will be accepted until 5 August.

    A more detailed snapshot of changes proposed to residential zones in the draft Major Plan Amendment is available here.

    The ’missing middle’ housing scale.

    – Statement ends –

    Chris Steel, MLA | Media Releases

    «ACT Government Media Releases | «Minister Media Releases

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Post-Cabinet Press Conference: Monday 19 May 2025

    Source: NZ Music Month takes to the streets

    POST-CABINET PRESS CONFERENCE: Monday, 19 May 2025

    PM:           Welcome. Hey, well, kia ora, good afternoon, everyone. Before I begin, can I just congratulate the legend that is Ardie Savea and just say how fantastic it is that he’s won the Super Rugby player of the tournament before the tournament is even finished, and what we saw on the weekend was a pretty standout performance and great leadership. 

    Anyway, I digress. I’ll get back to the purpose, which is that I want to say welcome to Budget Week. That’s what we’re here to do this week. I am joined by Finance Minister Nicola Willis, who just in three days’ time will deliver her second Budget, and it will be a Budget that provides economic stability, that supports investment, and makes New Zealand an attractive place for the world to trade and to do business with. It will be in stark contrast to what we’ve seen from the Opposition, which wants to ramp the debt up and hike income tax to the point where nurses will have their take-home pay reduced. And on top of all of that, they’re prepared to release violent prisoners into the community to make their spending promises stack up. Our budget will be more responsible than this. Our Budget will be a growth Budget, and as evidence of this, the finance Minister will soon walk you through some changes that we’re introducing to remove tax roadblocks to investment. 

    But before that, I want to talk about why we’re focusing on growth in this year’s Budget. The cost of living crisis, fuelled by the wasteful spending of the previous administration, has been hurting Kiwis for too long. The price we pay for almost everything has gone up harder and faster than we’ve been used to because of red hot inflation. The good news is that through careful economic management over the past 18 months, we have turned a corner and the economy is getting back on track. We have inflation back under control, getting it down from over 7 percent to 2.5 percent by stopping Government wasteful spending. That lower inflation has in turn then brought interest rates down and Kiwis are now seeing the benefit of that in lower mortgage repayments. 

    The economy is out of recession, with the Reserve Bank forecasting economic growth of 2.4 percent for 2025. New Zealand’s finances are under control and we’re on track to reach surplus in 2028 to 2029. We’ve put a lid on Government debt, which blew out by $120 billion between 2019 and 2024, a staggering $22,000 extra for every New Zealander. Rents are now flat after skyrocketing by $180 a week under Labour, and most importantly, most importantly, wages are growing faster than inflation, so now when Kiwis get a pay bump, it isn’t just being eaten up by everyday costs to the extent that it was under Labour, when the cost of living was so high that between 2020 and 2023, average wages rose only $82 a year after inflation. In contrast, the average annual wage after inflation has increased by more than $1,100 since the last election, and that’s great news, fantastic news for working Kiwis. 

    But there’s more for us to do and what New Zealand now needs is a sustained period where wages rise faster than the cost of what people are buying, so that they can get ahead of the price hikes that they saw under the previous Government. It’s only through growing the economy and encouraging more investment that we will achieve this. A growing economy, as we say, makes—it creates more jobs, it raises incomes, and it gives Kiwis more money to deal with the cost of living. 

    Our relentless focus on growth is why you won’t see an irresponsible spending spree in the Budget. New Zealand simply cannot afford it or put it at risk. Just like every household, we’ve made tough choices about what we spend our money on to make ends meet, but we’re confident that we’ve invested taxpayers’ money where it will have the most impact. And with that, I’ll hand over to Nicola to talk a little bit more about further action we’ll take in Budget 2025 to promote economic growth, with two tax changes designed to encourage greater investment in the economy from offshore and within New Zealand’s dynamic start-up community. 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     As the Prime Minister just said, an economic recovery is now underway in New Zealand that is good news for all Kiwis. However, we must not take that recovery for granted. Our Budget must address underlying challenges that could stand in the way of fiscal repair and economic growth. The Budget has been put together in very constrained circumstances. The last Government effectively left the kitty bare, worse than that, in serious overdraft, and New Zealand is now running out of credit cards.

    The most important thing our Government must ensure in this Budget is that we protect and enhance economic growth. To grow the economy, we need more investment in the things that make businesses productive. Low capital intensity and low rates of foreign direct investment have been identified as key contributors to New Zealand’s relatively low levels of productivity. They mean that our workers are often at a disadvantage when compared with their international counterparts because they are working with less sophisticated tools and machinery. Low rates of foreign investment also mean that New Zealand sometimes misses out on the knowledge and expertise that comes with foreign capital. 

    Therefore, I am announcing today that the Budget sets aside $65 million over the next four years to adjust New Zealand’s thin capitalisation regime in order to support more investment in New Zealand infrastructure. Right now, New Zealand’s thin capitalisation rules limit the amount of tax-deductible debt that foreign investors can put into New Zealand investments. The purpose of these rules is to prevent income being shifted offshore and to protect New Zealand’s tax base. However, there is a risk that we have identified that the rules may be deterring investment, particularly in capital-intensive infrastructure projects that are typically funded by large amounts of debt. Therefore, it is our intention to adjust the rules once we have finished consulting on the details. Inland Revenue is releasing a consultation document today, available on their website, so that changes can be made in the tax bill scheduled for introduction in August. 

    The Budget also sets aside another $10 million over four years to make it easier for Kiwi start-ups to compete and to attract and retain high-quality staff. In my relatively new role as Minister of Economic Growth, one of the things that I’ve been struck by is the large number of clever, enterprising Kiwis creating businesses out of new ways of doing things. Many of these new businesses include equity in the business as part of the payment package they offer their staff. But problems arise if tax bills for their income on these shares arrives when workers are unable to realise the value of their shares—that is, they haven’t sold them yet but they’re already having to pay tax on them. Therefore, we are changing the rules to allow tax to be deferred until what the tax experts call a liquidity event, such as the sale of the shares. We need to make it as easy as possible for the next Rocket Lab and Wētā FX to emerge. The changes will also be introduced in the August tax bill. 

    These tax changes are modest in scale, but they demonstrate the Government’s commitment to driving economic growth. I’ll have a little more to say about that topic on Budget Day. Prime Minister, back to you. 

    PM:           Well, thank you, Nicola. Just quickly on the week ahead, I’ll be in Wellington Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, obviously, for the Budget on Thursday. On Friday, I’ll be in Auckland at various post-Budget events. And with that, we’re happy to take your questions. Sorry, can we go to Jo? 

    Media:      Is there any world where the Government is going to compromise on the sanctions that have been recommended in the Privileges Committee report in order to get something moved in the House more quickly tomorrow? 

    PM:           Those are decisions for the Privileges Committee. As you know, the debate will happen tomorrow and we’ll deal with that tomorrow. 

    Media:      The actual question, though. Is there any world where your party or the Government are prepared to compromise and reduce the 21 days for the two co-leaders and seven days for Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, in order to reach a compromise with the Opposition, who feel very strongly against that punishment? Are you prepared to consider that and are you discussing it with any other parties? 

    PM:           No, we have a privileges committee that’s empowered to make those decisions and determine what’s the appropriate punishment. The issue here is not about haka and waiata, as I keep seeing reported. The issue here is about actually parties not following the rules of Parliament. For our democracy to work, we need to have rules in this place, otherwise it devolves into absolute chaos. It’s really important that we actually have—everyone who comes here understands their obligations to actually follow the rules of Parliament. And that’s what the Privileges Committee has determined, and we support it. 

    Media:      Is the National Party open to concessions, though? Otherwise this could drag on for months.

    PM:           No. No. 

    Media:      You’re not open to concessions? 

    PM:           No. The privileges committee make that decision. They are empowered. We have representatives, as every party does, in the privileges committee, and the determination from the privileges committee we support. 

    Media:      Are you comfortable that all of your MPs in your party are actually OK with the 21 days and seven days that have been laid out in that report? 

    PM:           Yes, our caucus position’s really clear. We support the privileges committee, of which we have representation on. 

    Media:      Have you asked [Inaudible]?

    PM:           I don’t need to, Jo. We know our position. Our position is we have representation on the privileges committee with National Party members, as do all other political parties. They have made a determination and we support that. 

    Media:      It’s no longer an issue for the privileges committee though, is it? It’s been referred to the House. It’s the House’s job to debate it. So the privileges committee has done its job. 

    PM:           Sure. 

    Media:      Now it’s the House’s turn to do its job. 

    PM:           Sure, and there’ll be a debate tomorrow. 

    Media:      Are you not worried that this debate is just going to stretch on for hours and hours, potentially days and days, and you’ve got a Budget coming up on Thursday? 

    PM:           Well, I’d just say if that’s the choice of the Opposition to actually filibuster that, that’s up to them. So be it. I’d just say to you that New Zealanders up and down this country actually want us focused on them. That’s what I’m doing. That’s what Nicola’s doing. That’s why we’re focused on a Budget that’s actually about growing the economy and supporting Kiwis. So we’re focused on what matters most to New Zealanders, and what matters right—most to them right now is that we’re actually helping them on the economy. 

    Media:      What is your response to rangatira Māori who say that the penalty, which Speaker Brownlee described as unprecedented, that race was an aggravating factor in the privileges committee’s decision? 

    PM:           Reject that outright. The privileges committee comprises of senior representatives from all the political parties in Parliament. They made a determination and that’s up to them. 

    Media:      So you want to get on with passing laws and stuff like that. This could prevent you from doing that. You say you want to make life better and you’re focused on growth, but this could drag on for ages—

    PM:           Well, let’s see. Let’s see. 

    Media:      —because it takes [Inaudible] over all of the Government’s [Inaudible]. 

    PM:           Let’s see. I mean, we’ll have an opportunity tomorrow, and I’d just say I think if the Opposition wants to go that way, I think that is not what most reasonable-minded New Zealanders watching what’s happening here would say that’s right. They want us to get on with the business of government and the business of—that’s of interest to New Zealanders. What we’re doing by putting together a Budget that’s about growth and is responsible. And, you know, frankly, if they want to muck around, then so be it. Sorry, Maiki. 

    Media:      A question to the Finance Minister. Minister, what’s your message to businesses who want to see greater support in terms of exports but also greater support to grow their businesses when it comes to this week’s Budget?

    Hon Nicola Willis:     We want to back business to succeed, we on your side and our Budget is designed to give you even more confidence for the future. We back business because we need you to create the jobs that New Zealanders need, to create the growing incomes that New Zealanders need. Make no mistake, this Government is on your side. 

    Media:      And just in terms of KiwiSaver, do you think that employees and employers should up their contributions in KiwiSaver? 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     I’m not going to make any comments on KiwiSaver today. Just a few days to wait. 

    Media:      [Inaudible] a 1 percent increase in—

    Hon Nicola Willis:     I’m not going to make any comments on KiwiSaver today, just a few days to wait. 

    Media:      You acknowledged that the announcement you made today is modest. I spoke to Cameron Bagrie, an economist. He said that New Zealand’s infrastructure deficit is so high that net government debt of around 40 to 50 percent of GDP is going to end up being the new normal. Do you accept that? 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     Well, the last Government left us with debt at extraordinary levels. It is now higher than it has been since the mid-1990s. We cannot let that debt keep blowing out forever because if we do so, we are putting future New Zealanders at risk. We’re putting all of us at risk if there’s a major event that requires more borrowing. So our Government has set out a clear strategy to get the debt curve bending down. That’s the responsible course of action and our Budget will demonstrate progress towards it. 

    Media:      Do we risk that the economy crumbles away without enough investment? 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     No. We risk the economy crumbling away if we allow major extra taxes to be put on New Zealanders, if we allow such excessive borrowing that it drives up inflation and interest rates. That is the prescription being offered by the Opposition and that would put New Zealand’s economic recovery at risk and every New Zealand family with it. 

    Media:      Prime Minister, what do you say to people who are looking for a vision from the Government for New Zealand, a vision not just for the next four years but a vision for the next decade? 

    PM:           Well, I think you’re going to see that with this Budget. I mean the Budget is part of our journey to make sure that this is a country that is growing strongly, that is set up and managed well financially and economically, and that actually New Zealanders know that if they work hard in New Zealand they can get ahead. And so everything we’re doing, as I said from the beginning of the year, is designed to come through the lens of growth. Growth matters above everything else. You know, we need economic growth in New Zealand so that we can put more money back into Kiwis’ pockets, but importantly, to deliver and invest in the public services that we actually know Kiwis want and deserve, and so that’s what we’re doing here. 

    And I think we’ve found the right way—you’ll see it on Thursday—where we’re actually saying, look, yeah, we don’t want to go commit to a whole bunch of new borrowing or new taxes. That’s not the way forward. I hear that from the Opposition. We’ve been there before. That’s what caused this problem in the beginning. But equally, we have started to turn the corner but we don’t want to put any of that at risk. And therefore, good, prudent, you know, responsible management, while also, as Nicholas foreshadowed, good investments in healthcare and education. You’ve started to see some of those pre-Budget announcements come through. Obviously, transport, infrastructure, and also economic growth. So, you know, we are—you know, we are balancing, I think we’ve got—we’ve got the balance right and New Zealanders will see that this is a really good step forward for us and where we want to go as a country. 

    Media:      Has Cabinet approved the draft of the Regulatory Standards Bill and will it be introduced to the House this week? 

    PM:           Again, we don’t talk about what we’ve discussed in Cabinet. I’d just say the Regulatory Standards Bill is, as you know, designed to improve the quality of lawmaking, to make it more transparent. 

    Media:      David Seymour quite specifically said that he was taking it to Cabinet today. Act has said the Bill is being introduced to Parliament this week, so it’s not a trade secret. Is that happening? 

    PM:           Well, David Seymour can say whatever he likes to. I’m just telling you my position is I don’t talk about what happens in Cabinet. 

    Media:      Is it going to be introduced to the House this week? 

    PM:           Again, you’ll have to wait and see. 

    Media:      What about the Waitangi Tribunal’s report last week that said that the Government had breached the Treaty in not consulting appropriately with Māori on the Bill? What’s your response to that? 

    PM:           Well, look, I mean, as I said, if you just take a step back, what is the original—what is the purpose of this bill? It is actually designed to make sure that Ministers are making good regulation. It’s to make sure there’s more transparency over regulation. It’s pretty, you know, dull but very worthy sort of stuff. It’s important. But importantly is also there’s a lot of consultation that’s needed because the devil’s in the detail, and so ultimately this Bill will come to the House. There’ll be a discussion through a select committee process. There’s complexity in it. The devil’s in the detail of actually what gets implemented, and we’ll work our way through that as we’ll have another conversation. 

    Media:      How is what you just said there relevant to the Tribunal’s report last week? 

    PM:           Well, the Tribunal—the Tribunal has a range of views on a range of things, which obviously we consider, but I’m just saying to you what the Bill was actually about. 

    Media:      So in terms of the Tribunal saying that you’ve breached the Treaty in failing to consult Māori appropriately, I mean, do you agree with that? 

    PM:           I disagree. I mean, I disagree. We consider what the Waitangi Tribunal will say and then, you know, you will see a Bill come to the House in due course. 

    Media:      The Deputy Prime Minister has said that he has expressed some sort of indication that he wants to see changes to the Bill. Are you clear on what those changes he will seek are? Are you—

    PM:           Well, I’ll let—I’ll let—

    Media:      [Inaudible] will that happen? 

    PM:           Yeah, look, I’ll Winston Peters talk for New Zealand First and their position around that, but I’d just say to you what we do acknowledge, a bit like fast track legislation, this is a really complex piece of legislation. It’s really important that actually the Bill is strengthened through the course of a parliamentary process of select committees and second readings, etc, and that’s what we’ll do here. 

    Media:      Prime Minister, this morning on ZB, when you were talking to Mike Hosking, he asked a question about the Māorification of New Zealand. Your support of the punitive measures levelled against Te Pāti Māori, the Regulatory Standards Bill, the review into the Waitangi Tribunal and the now defunct Treaty Principles Bill, is that the National coalition government’s strategy in the de-Māorification of New Zealand?

    PM:           Look, I’m not characterising it that way. We are—each of those issues are different issues and I’m happy to debate each and every one of them with you. You know, as I said—and you want to bundle them all up and make a question like that. I’m not responding to that. 

    Media:      Prime Minister, do you think it’s racist to say that New Zealand is being “Māori-fied”, that we’re seeing the Māorification of New Zealand? 

    PM:           Well, I wouldn’t use those words. They were questions that a member of the media asked me. All I’m just saying to you is that what we’re interested in is the Government’s making sure we advance outcomes for Māori and non-Māori. That’s why you’ve seen us invest $200 million, for example, in Māori housing. That’s why I was in, you know, Tairāwhiti last week, actually opening up another 149 houses that have been done in conjunction with iwi, Government, and business to deliver those homes. So there’s a lot of good things that we’re doing to advance interest for Māori and a lot of really positive conversations happening with iwi. A good example would be the billion-dollar investment between Brookfield and Waikato-Tainui that fell out of the back of the infrastructure summit, and is a good example of what we want to see a lot more of. 

    Media:      Understanding that those weren’t your words, they were words that were put to you, do you think that it’s a racist term? 

    PM:           I wouldn’t characterise or use that word in that way, personally. Just not the way I’d describe things. I want to make sure—

    Media:      Why did you not [Inaudible] the comment, then?

    PM:           I want to make sure that actually we’re delivering outcomes for Māori and non-Māori. I’ve been very straight up about that from day one. You guys get sick of me saying it but that’s what it’s about. 

    Media:      Prime Minister, Te Pāti Māori says that the public gallery in Parliament is going to be closed tomorrow. Are you aware of that, and is that appropriate to be closing the gallery when there’s such important debates like the privileges committee’s report tomorrow? 

    PM:           I’m unaware of that. Those are decisions, obviously, for the Speaker to make. 

    Media:      Do you think that’s appropriate, though, closing down the ability of the public to [Inaudible] that?

    PM:           Again, decisions for the Speaker. I’m responsible for leading the Executive. The Speaker’s responsible for Parliament. 

    Media:      Former Cook Islands Deputy Prime Minister Norman George has proposed a gradual reintegration of the Cook Islands into New Zealand, including having New Zealand take over services like education, health and policing. Is this something New Zealand would either consider entertaining in principle? 

    PM:           Well, look, I mean, we have a very special relationship with the Cook Islands. As you know, it’s coming up 60 years and, you know, we—with that it’s a very special constitutional arrangement where we have certain rights and responsibilities to each other, and obviously as a Realm country we take our obligations incredibly seriously. Any change or evolution of those arrangements, we’re always up for the conversation, but it would need to come from the Cook Islands people. 

    Media:      He also has suggested that Cook Islanders should have dedicated seats in the New Zealand Parliament, similar to Māori seats. What’s your view on his idea? 

    PM:           Well, look, again, you know, it’s—I’m not going to react just to an individual’s idea. Anything that is concrete and proposed would come through proper channels for proper debate, discussion. But we do have very strong constitutional arrangements with the Realm country arrangement that has obligations on both parties. But again, this is up to the Cook Islands people to determine, and we listen to them very carefully. 

    Media:      Prime Minister—

    PM:           Tom. 

    Media:      Hello, hello. 

    PM:           How are you?

    Media:      I’m grand. 

    PM:           Good. 

    Media:      It’s been two weeks, or nearly two weeks, since you brought in those pay equity changes. Why can’t you still say how much Treasury has appraised that you would save as a result of stopping those 33 claims? 

    PM:           Because it will all be revealed on Budget Day on Thursday when you get the total picture of our fiscal situation. 

    Media:      But it’s already been passed into law. Why can’t you just reveal the number that Treasury has [Inaudible]— 

    PM:           Well, the reason that I’ve said is the Budget number is sensitive and it needs to be seen in the context of our whole fiscal plan, which will be presented on Thursday. 

    Media:      Finance Minister, when do you hope to pass the Budget by, through the Parliament? 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     Well, we’ll introduce a number of pieces of legislation on Thursday. Some of them we’ll want to pass through all stages. Others will just be introduced for a first reading. 

    Media:      So have you got a date, and are you worried that your Budget will be delayed by the debate over the privileges committee? 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     I’m not concerned by that. I’m confident that the Budget will be a priority for all members of Parliament. After all, the Budget is what keeps the lights on in our hospitals, our schools, and ensures that New Zealanders can get their superannuation payments, their welfare payments, and I would be surprised if any member of Parliament would want to stand in the way of that happening. 

    Media:      Do you believe there is room for the Government to do more to encourage businesses to invest more in technology, machinery and that type of thing? 

    PM:           Yeah, look, I mean—I mean, obviously we want to encourage businesses to invest big time. There’s a number of things that we’re doing, we’ve already pre-announced. There’ll be, no doubt, other things we’ll talk about on Budget Day as well. But, you know, we want—we want—we’re doing everything we can, as you’ve seen over the course of the last 18 months, to make sure that our businesses—whether it’s about removing red tape and complexity and costs that are—that are loading them up. We want them freed up to be able to grow and expand their businesses so that they can take on more workers and pay higher wages. It’s pretty simple. 

    And so we are a pro-business Government, deliberately, because we know that’s what drives economic growth. We create the conditions for the growth, but it’s actually our business community that steps up and actually creates the businesses and the ideas that delivers and generates that growth. And so we want to do everything we can to get the settings as positive as possible for them to do the very best that they can. 

    Media:      If you were to accelerate depreciation on capital investments, would you be open to cherry-picking individual assets, or if you were to do that type of change, would you want to do it across the board? 

    PM:           Hypothetical conversation. All I was expressing was, you know, that’s an interesting thought and idea. I’m sure it comes with a huge cost as well so, I mean, let’s park that up and we’ll…

    Media:      Minister, is this the modest tax move that you said had moved the bar for the Treasury?

    Hon Nicola Willis:     Can I just be clear about something, which is there have been some commentators in the media in recent days who have proposed that there could be on the cards a 100 percent expensing or depreciation regime and that would come with a fiscal price tag of $34 billion over the next four years, more than $8 billion a year. So you’ll understand, no, that’s not on the cards for this Budget. 

    Media:      Minister, that’s obviously far too expensive but would you be open to an uplift of the depreciation rate of, say, 20 percent, as was it was before 2010? That type of change would be much cheaper. 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     Look, I’m going to leave comments on these matters to Budget Day. 

    PM:           Bryce, sorry.

    Media:      Have you thought about whether you want someone from the National caucus out to the protestors that will be out in front of Parliament on Thursday? 

    PM:           Look, we—I haven’t. It’s not been a topic of conversation thus far today. We’ve got our caucus meeting tomorrow. It might be something we discuss there. 

    Media:      Obviously, pay equity will probably form quite a big part of that. Do you think it’s important that someone from the caucus—and this might be something for you as well, Finance Minister—goes out there and explains why you did what you did?

    PM:           I genuinely haven’t had a conversation about that. In fairness, we haven’t had a caucus meeting this week. 

    Media:      Can you explain why the, I think, $75 million you announced today, the $160 million you announced yesterday, the $500 million you announced last week, and I think the $160 million you announced on Monday, why that’s not Budget-sensitive and yet the billions you’re cutting from pay equity are Budget-sensitive?

    PM:           Well, we have a series of pre-Budget announcements, which is what you’ve seen over the last couple of weeks as we’ve gone through different areas. Not everything’s been revealed and understandably so, but we need to be able to present that coherency of that total package and that fiscal position on Thursday and that’s why we’ve made that decision. 

    Media:      Why have you chosen these investments to publicise the figure ahead of Budget day and yet for the pay equity changes, which are currently the law, you haven’t allowed that figure to become public? 

    PM:           Well, again, as I—I don’t know how to explain it. I just answered that before. I mean, we see this as being part of a total fiscal package that we need to present on Budget day and as a result, that will be revealed in a couple of days’ time. 

    Media:      The stuff you’ve announced today and the film subsidies last week, that’s also part of the fiscal package—

    PM:           Sure. Sure it is. 

    Media:      —so what makes it different? 

    Media:           But we always announce—we always have pre-Budget announcements. There’s a series of them, a package of them. We made a set that we decided we wanted to announce before. There’ll be things that we also announce on Budget day as well. 

    Media:      Why did you choose not to put the figure of the pay equity change as a pre-Budget announcement, the number? 

    PM:           Well, as I said before, we want to be able to present the total fiscal package and that’s what we can do comprehensively on Budget Day. 

    Media:      Does “Budget-sensitive” just mean “things we don’t want to talk about before Budget Day”? 

    PM:           Not at all. You’ll hear us talking about pay equity and the projected costs and how they may be different on Budget day. 

    Media:      Nicole Willis, can I just ask you, would you personally like the Te Pāti Māori co-leaders to be able to participate—

    PM:           Have to say I like the way he used your surname, [Inaudible].

    Media:      —in those Budget discussions on Thursday as they occur? 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     Look, sometimes in Parliament it is not a matter of personal view. The privileges committee have made a ruling which is designed to uphold the standards of conduct in Parliament. There is a clear procedure by which that will be debated in Parliament and parties will cast their vote and I can confirm that the National Party will be supporting the privileges committee. 

    Media:      I’m just asking you personally though. This is your Budget. I’m sure you’ll get many different bits of commentary on what it may contain, but would you not appreciate the Te Pāti Māori co-leaders being able to have their opportunity to give their voice on what they see in it?

    Hon Nicola Willis:     Well, Tom, it’s not about me, but the reflection I would offer is that I think New Zealanders are sick of the circus in Parliament. They want to see their members of Parliament focused on the issues that matter to them, which fundamentally are around the cost of living, their health services, their education services, the future of the New Zealand economy. So I think any party that chooses to have a chaotic distraction from that is going to find themselves pretty quickly out of line with everyday Kiwis who just want to see MPs get on with serving them. 

    PM:           Sorry, can I just go to Benedict?

    Media:      Prime Minister, do you believe New Zealand communities have the resources they need, looking at addiction issues in particular, in terms of that surge of methamphetamine that we’re getting into New Zealand at the moment? 

    PM:           Yeah, look, firstly, can I thank you for your story, I saw the first part of it last night. Look, we—it is incredibly worrying what is happening with meth. From our best understanding, what we’re seeing is global prices have collapsed and within that context prices are lower in New Zealand, but still New Zealand’s relativity to global prices is still very, very high. And we’ve got—you know, as you would have found in your own reporting, actually people trying to get to the root cause of why has it spiked so dramatically in the latter part of 2024. That’s something that I’ve tasked our Ministers with as well. 

    I think there’s three things we’ve got to do. One is we have to make sure that we’ve got very strong borders in place. Two, we have to disrupt distribution, and you highlighted, I think, five towns last night where that’s a major challenge. And thirdly, we have to make sure we’ve got better addiction services in place as well. So I’ve asked the relevant Ministers to form a small sprint team. They’re due very shortly to come back to me as to what can we do immediately to jump on board that. But if we need more resources to fight that, we will put that in place. 

    Media:      Can we afford to do that though, with the tight Budget [Inaudible]—

    PM:           We can’t afford not to. Meth is a real scourge on all New Zealanders and I think everybody has, through a family or a friend, has had someone impacted by that across this country. And we’re doing everything we can to give police powers to crack down on gangs which distribute the illegal drugs, and meth in particular. We’re doing everything we can to give police powers and authority to really get down on—with the gang unit increases that we’ve put in place. Even the beat police being out on patrol, that’s helping. But again, you know, we’ve got a real issue here and actually we’ve really got to get to the root cause of it, and actually I suspect it will be in those three spaces but we need to make sure we’ve got a full court press on it, absolutely. 

    Media:      Prime Minister, just to be clear, do you rule out supporting any amendments at all to the committee findings? You won’t support any amendments throughout debate? 

    PM:           Again, our National Party position, and I can only speak to the National Party, is—

    Media:      But you will rule out supporting any debates at all? You won’t budge at all? You’ll stick to the letter, to what [Inaudible]—

    PM:           We have representation from our party on the privileges committee. The privileges committee has functioned over a number of years, dealing with a number of different disputes. We back the privileges committee decision and that’s what our party’s doing. 

    Media:      So no compromise on that? 

    PM:           No. 

    Media:      Prime Minister, David Seymour was critical of the pre-Budget announcement about film and television subsidies. He said it was not a good policy. Has he broken the collective responsibility clause in your coalition agreement? 

    PM:           Well, he may be expressing an Act Party view on that and, you know, whatever. I mean, the bottom line is that we’ve got a Government position, which is that we are backing this industry. The reality is that every—you may not like these subsidies and I get it. I usually don’t like subsidies to industries either. But every country on Earth offers rebates in the way that we do, and I’d just say to you that, you know, we have an outstanding film industry. It employs 24,000 people. I think over the last 10 years we’ve, you know, attracted $7.5 billion worth of productions, we’ve paid out about $1.5 billion of actual rebates, and when you think about it—since late ‘23 I think we’ve had 10 productions in this country, eight from Hollywood, including, you know, a Minecraft story as well. So I mean, I think, you know, this is an industry that’s doing incredibly well. The rebates kind of work but it’s just the ticket that you have to pay in order to actually get productions in your country, and I—and New Zealand’s a fantastic place to do film production. That’s why I talked about it in India and I talk about it everywhere I go. 

    Media:      In your coalition agreement though, it does say, “Once Cabinet makes a decision, Ministers must support it … regardless of their personal views”. Is he able to do this? 

    PM:           Well, I’d just say to you we’ve got a—we’ve got a Government position. We’re supporting it. It’s happening. The money’s going in. We’re backing this industry big time. That’s the Government’s position. 

    Media:      But Seymour’s criticising it, though. 

    PM:           Well, as I’ve said to you, like, you know, I just—I just wouldn’t get too—I wouldn’t get too hung up on it, I’d just—

    Media:      [Inaudible] don’t know whether he’s wearing his ministerial hat and when he’s wearing his Act hat. 

    PM:           No, I’d just—I’d just say to you, look, don’t get too hung up on it. I said to you from day one we’re in a three-party coalition in a mature MMP environment. If I’m sitting in the Netherlands or I’m sitting in Germany or I’m sitting in other countries that have the same system that we have, Finland, others, it’s quite normal there is different ways of expressing things and there’ll be differences from the different party leaders within a coalition. But I’m just saying to you, our Government position is really crystal clear. We are backing the film industry, period. 

    Media:      Has any progress been made with New Zealand First on a foreign buyers tax? 

    PM:           It’s still an ongoing—thank you for the question, Jo. It’s still an ongoing point of conversation. 

    Media:      Are you anticipating that you might be able to do anything in the Budget or perhaps this month, based on how far conversations have progressed? 

    PM:           Oh, look, again, I’m not pre-empting any Budget conversations, but—

    Media:      Is the progress that is taking place around moving thresholds?

    PM:           Well, as I’ve said to you before, we’ve got a position, which is that, you know, we went to the election with a policy. We think we probably could lift the—as I said this morning, we could lift the threshold but obviously that’s a discussion with New Zealand First we have to have. As you know, we also have policies that are different from New Zealand First. Think superannuation age. It’s no different here. So we’ve got to work our way through that and see if we can find a way through it. 

    Media:      Is there an appetite from New Zealand First? Because previously it was just, like, not interested. Is the reason that you are able to have talks because New Zealand First has actually expressed an appetite for, if the threshold was shifted, that they would be—

    PM:           Well, you saw public comments from Winston, I think it was, last year where he said, look, you know, there’s—you know, he’s not against investment into New Zealand and that’s been good. That’s evidenced by the pro-investment settings that we’ve been able to put through as a Government. But look, on that particular issue, which is not the be-all and end-all of attracting investment to New Zealand, it’s a component of it, it’s an important part, it’s a piece of it but it’s not the only part of it—

    Media:      Have you had any advice on how much of an impact it might have?

    PM:           No, no, no, we just—we have a coalition conversation, which we’ll continue to have. There’s a very strong position from New Zealand First, a strong position from National. We’ll see whether we can find a way through. If not, we’ll move forward. Sorry, Luke. 

    Media:      One for the Minister of Finance, please. Half a billion more for film subsidies, a bit for Elevate last week, broader Government procurement processes, perhaps taking on the supermarkets—it appears that you, over the last few months, have been taking what, compared to the past 30 years, might be a slightly unorthodox approach to centre-right economic management, particularly in the growth area. I’m kind of wondering if we can get a sense of whether there might be some more of that more expansive thinking in the Budget.

    Hon Nicola Willis:     Yeah, I’ve called it the growth Budget for a reason. I think the major challenge for New Zealand is not about how we can nickel and dime our way to surplus, it’s about how we can grow our economy faster. And if you look back over the past 30 years, we haven’t been growing fast enough and that’s why New Zealanders’ incomes haven’t risen as much as they have in many other countries. That’s why our Government’s books haven’t been in the position we would wish them to be in. 

    So in this Budget I very much had my Economic Growth Minister hat on, thinking about what are the things we can do now that will not only secure the economic recovery that’s currently underway, but will drive us onto a higher growth trajectory for the future. We have long-standing challenges with productivity and investment, and I’m determined that our Government will make changes now that will pay off for many years to come. It’s not just a short-term budget, it’s a budget for the long term. 

    Media:      So can we expect quite a number of, I guess, micro-economic changes of the sort that have been announced today in Thursday’s Budget? 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     There will be, and I just reiterate again, within the significant constraints that we face. The last Government left us in severe overdraft. There’s a huge amount of cleaning up for us to do, and so the vast majority of new initiatives that we will deliver in our Budget will be funded from savings, because without those savings, we would need to either impose significant additional taxes on New Zealanders or borrow to levels that would put our economy at risk. So, within those constraints, we have done our utmost to get behind growth. 

    Media:      The pre-Budget housing announcement to Toitū Tairāwhiti, a very good announcement to Toitū Tairāwhiti—

    PM:           Sorry, can you say that again? A good announcement?

    Media:      A very good announcement last week. 

    PM:           It was, wasn’t it? 

    Media:      Minister Willis, congratulations on the pre-Budget announcement on housing, Māori housing. The question is: can you confirm if Māori housing providers are actually outstripping the Government’s supply of housing to whānau? 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     Well, I’m very excited about the potential for the Government to work even more with Māori institutions to deliver housing, and that’s because oftentimes, whether it’s iwi, hapū, or other Māori-led organisations, what they bring to the equation is Māori land that would otherwise not be developed, and that of course reduces the potential cost of new housing. So that is something that Minister Potaka and Minister Bishop are very conscious of and as we move to deliver more affordable housing for New Zealanders, we want to make the most of those opportunities. 

    Media:      They’ve actually supplied almost 1,000 whare, which is actually more than what Kāinga Ora has supplied. So the question was: are Māori housing providers outgunning the state in building whare for whānau? 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     Well, I’d leave Mr Bishop to look at the specifics of those numbers, but what I would say is that Māori housing providers are making a significant and very much appreciated contribution to addressing New Zealand’s housing challenges. 

    PM:           And I’d just say I thought that—I thought that project was a very good one, to be honest, because it showed us the model going forward. There’s $200 million going into Māori housing, you know, that was 149 houses built in Tairāwhiti when we know there’s been a programme of about 500 houses that we’ve needed to get in there. But the combination of iwi working with Government, with business, to actually get the scale of those houses through, the quality of that build of house through, to identify the families that desperately need it—I met the families that were actually about to go into the first houses. It was a pretty special, pretty emotional day, actually. And also then to have a Government with Ministers like Tama Potaka and Chris Bishop that have actually created the environment for that to happen, I think is pretty cool. 

    So, OK, we’ll go to Lloyd and then we’ll go to Thomas. Last question. 

    Media:      Just to clarify, Minister Willis, on what you said about KiwiSaver, are you scrapping or tinkering with the Government’s contribution? 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     I said nothing about KiwiSaver and I won’t be saying anything about KiwiSaver until Budget day. 

    Media:      Can you please rule it out for Kiwis concerned that you’re about to scrap—

    Hon Nicola Willis:     I’m not ruling anything in or out. There’s just three days to go. It’ll be very clear on Budget Day. 

    Media:      OK, so you are tinkering with KiwiSaver settings? That’s the—

    Hon Nicola Willis:     I’ve made it clear that I want to see New Zealanders’ KiwiSaver balances grow and I’ll have more to say about that on Budget day. 

    Media:      So you won’t be cutting them? 

    Hon Nicola Willis:     I’ll have more to say about our KiwiSaver policy on Budget day. 

    PM:           It’s Monday today, Lloyd. Thursday’s coming shortly. OK, Thomas, last question. 

    Media:      The Clerk’s advice to the privileges committee revealed that a member on the committee sought advice on imprisonment as a potential punishment. Do you think that was overreach, [Inaudible]?

    PM:           Look, I’m sorry, I’m not going into the conversations of a privileges committee. We haven’t previously spoken about privileges committees. We let them get on and do their work with senior representation from all parties in Parliament to actually make sure that Parliament functions in the way that it’s supposed to function. All I think is if you’re a New Zealander watching Parliament and all of this, that looks like a massive distraction, frankly, from what they care about. We have a privileges committee. We have a clear process. We need to have rules in this place so that we can actually discuss difficult and emotional subjects without order breaking down, and we back this privileges committee and the decision they’ve made. 

    Media:      Do you think imprisonment probably takes that a couple of steps too far? 

    PM:           That’s not what the privileges committee has proposed. 

    Media:      No, but a member clearly thought that that was something that they might want advice on, to have it on the table.

    PM:           Well, I’m not going to comment on privileges committee’s conversation because I’m not a member of the privileges committee. That’s why we have a set of senior MPs that are part of that committee. It’s a very serious body. It deals with serious issues about parliamentary behaviour, and I think any conversation outside of that group is really unhelpful. We haven’t done that in the past. We expect those conversations to happen inside that committee and to be dealt with by that committee. They’re entrusted as parliamentarians to represent all the parties that are there. So, you know, for me, I’m just saying to you, yeah, we—you know, New Zealanders want us to get on and actually help them dealing with the cost of living, getting our economy growing, getting money in their back pockets. That’s what we’re focused on. 

    Media:      [Inaudible] Opposition favour the lower sanction against the Te Pāti Māori MPs out of a view to a potential post-election coalition talks? 

    PM:          That was the last question, Thomas, and as I said, I’ll refer you to my further—answer just before, which is we don’t talk—I don’t talk about privileges committee or what happens in there because I’m not a member of privileges committee, as you know. Cool, thank you, team. Have a good week. 

    conclusion of press conference

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Three arrests in Wairoa in relation to weekend incidents

    Source: New Zealand Police

    To be attributed to Acting Detective Senior Sergeant Darren Pritchard:

    Three Wairoa men are before the courts following three separate, unrelated incidents in the town over the weekend.

    The first incident occurred in Ruataniwha Road at around midday on Saturday 17 May, when a man allegedly presented a firearm.

    Soon after, officers located the man in a vehicle and arrested him. The 50-year-old man subsequently appeared in Gisborne District Court, facing several firearms and drug-related charges.

    The second incident was a house fire in Frasertown at around 7.30pm on Saturday. The house was totally destroyed and was determined to be suspicious.

    A 37-year-old man was arrested on Monday 19 May and charged with arson. He was scheduled to appear in Gisborne District Court today.

    The third incident was a report of gunshots being fired in the Clyde Domain, followed by a serious crash on Kopu Road in the early hours of Sunday morning (19 May).

    The crash claimed the life of the driver and a passenger sustained minor injuries.  That passenger, a 27-year-old man, was subsequently arrested and charged with firearms-related offending. He is scheduled to appear in Wairoa District Court on 25 May.

    Police will continue to make enquiries into the crash – and the events leading up to the crash – on behalf of the Coroner. Our sympathies are with the family and loved ones of the deceased driver.

    ENDS

    Issued by Police Media Centre. 

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: CLARKE ISSUES STATEMENT ON UNJUST CHARGES BROUGHT AGAINST REP. LAMONICA MCIVER

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Congresswoman Yvette D Clarke (9th District of New York)

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

    May 19, 2025

    MEDIA CONTACT: 

    e: jessica.myers@mail.house.gov

    c: 202.913.0126

    WASHINGTON, DC – Congresswoman Yvette D. Clarke (NY-09) released the following statement:

    “The baseless charges filed this evening against Congresswoman LaMonica McIver are nothing more than a reprehensible political stunt intended to intimidate an exceptional public servant into abiding by the overwhelming injustice and cruelty created by the very administration now prosecuting her. For months, this president and his lackeys have been relentless in trying to disrupt the work of Congress as a co-equal branch of government. Now, they’ve stooped so low and so shamefully as to weaponize the Justice Department against Rep. McIver, who only stood up for the freedoms of her constituents and her fellow elected officials. 

    “Members of Congress have every right to conduct oversight. When egregious, illegal violations are taking place, they have a responsibility to do so. Rep. McIver was just doing her job, and that is why the American people recognize these charges as bogus to a laughable degree. No matter how many attempts this administration makes to intimidate Congress, local leaders, the federal workforce, or anyone who stands up against the Trump regime, they should know our resolve is only deepened by this disgusting attack. He does not have the capacity to scare us.

    “Donald Trump took a monstrous step on his pathway to dictatorship tonight. With it, it’s clear this is no longer the America I know.”

    ###

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: Can you treat headaches with physiotherapy? Here’s what the research says

    Source: The Conversation – Global Perspectives – By Zhiqi Liang, Lecturer in Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland

    BaanTaksinStudio/Shutterstock

    You might’ve noticed some physiotherapists advertise they offer treatments for headaches and wondered: would that work?

    In fact, there’s a solid body of research showing that physiotherapy treatments can be really helpful for certain types of headache.

    Sometimes, however, medical management is also necessary and it’s worth seeing a doctor. Here’s what you need to know.

    Cervicogenic headache: when pain travels up your neck

    Cervicogenic headache is where pain is referred from the top of the neck (an area known as the upper cervical spine).

    Pain is usually one-sided. It generally starts just beneath the skull at the top of the neck, spreading into the back of the head and sometimes into the back of the eye.

    Neck pain and headache are often triggered by activities that put strain on the neck, such as holding one posture or position for a long time, or doing repetitive neck movements (such as looking up and down repeatedly).

    Unlike in migraine, people experiencing cervicogenic headache don’t usually get nausea or sensitivity to light and sound.

    Because this is a musculoskeletal condition of the upper neck, physiotherapy treatments that improve neck function – such as manual therapy, exercise and education – can provide short- and long-term benefits.

    Cervicogenic headache is where pain is referred from the top of the neck.
    24K-Production/Shutterstock

    Can physio help with migraine?

    Migraine is a neurological disorder whereby the brain has difficulty processing sensory input.

    This can cause episodic attacks of moderate to severe headache, as well as:

    • sensitivity to light and noise
    • nausea and
    • intolerance to physical exertion.

    There are many triggers. Everyone’s are different and identifying yours is crucial to self-management of migraine. Medication can also help, so seeing a GP is the first step if you suspect you have migraine.

    About 70-80% of people with migraine also have neck pain, commonly just before or at the onset of a migraine attack. This can make people think their neck pain is triggering the migraine.

    While this may be true in some people, our research has shown many people with migraine have nothing wrong with their neck despite having neck pain.

    In those cases, neck pain is part of migraine and can be a warning (but not a cause or trigger) of an imminent migraine attack. It can signal patients need to take steps to prevent the attack.

    Migraine is a neurological disorder whereby the brain has difficulty processing sensory input.
    Srdjan Randjelovic/Shutterstock

    On the other hand, if the person has musculoskeletal neck disorder, physiotherapy neck treatments may help improve their migraine. Musculoskeletal neck disorder is what physiotherapists call typical neck pain caused by, for instance, a sports injury or sleeping in a weird way.

    You may have heard of the Watson manual therapy technique being used to treat migraine. It involves applying manual pressure to the upper cervical spine and neck area.

    There are currently no peer-reviewed studies looking at how effective this technique is for migraine.

    However, recent studies investigating a combination of manual therapy, neck exercises and education tailored to the individual’s circumstances show some small effects in improving the number of migraine attacks and the disabling effects of headache.

    Manual therapy and neck exercises can also give short-term pain relief.

    However, in some cases the neck can become very sensitive and easily aggravated in migraine. That means inappropriate assessment or treatment could end up triggering a migraine.

    Physiotherapy can help with migraine but you first need a comprehensive and skilled physical assessment of the neck by an experienced physiotherapist. It’s crucial to identify if a musculoskeletal neck disorder is present and, if so, which type of neck treatment is needed.

    It is also important people with migraine understand how their migraine is triggered, what lifestyle factors contribute to it and when to take the appropriate medications to help manage their migraines.

    A trained physiotherapist can provide some of this information and help patients make sense of their condition and recommend the patient see their GP for medication, when appropriate.

    What about tension headaches?

    Tension type headache is the most common type of headache, characterised by a feeling of “tightness” or “band-like” pain around the head.

    Nausea and sensitivity to light and noise are not usually present with this type of headache.

    Like migraine, tension type headache is often associated with neck pain and also has different aggravating factors, not all of which are due to the neck.

    Tension type headache is often associated with neck pain.
    staras/Shutterstock

    Again, a detailed assessment by a trained physiotherapist is needed to identify if the neck is involved and what type of neck treatment is best.

    There is some evidence a combination of manual therapy and exercise can reduce tension type headache.

    Physiotherapists can also provide education and advice on aggravating factors and self management.

    Seeking help

    There are many types and causes of headache. If you suffer frequent headaches or have a new or unusual headache, ask a doctor to investigate.

    There is good evidence physiotherapy treatment will improve cervicogenic headache and emerging evidence it might help migraine and tension type headache (alongside usual medical care).

    If you are wondering if you have cervicogenic headache or if you have bothersome neck pain associated with headache, ask your doctor to refer you to a skilled physiotherapist trained in headache treatment. A careful assessment can determine if physiotherapy treatment will help.

    Zhiqi Liang received funding from the Australian Physiotherapy Association and the Physiotherapy Research Foundation. She is affiliated with the Australian College of Physiotherapists and the Australian Physiotherapy Association.

    Julia Treleaven and Lucy Thomas do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Can you treat headaches with physiotherapy? Here’s what the research says – https://theconversation.com/can-you-treat-headaches-with-physiotherapy-heres-what-the-research-says-256581

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI USA News: ICYMI: President Trump Signs TAKE IT DOWN Act into Law

    Source: The White House

    Today, President Donald J. Trump signed the TAKE IT DOWN Act into law — a key initiative of First Lady Melania Trump and a landmark step in the fight to protect victims of digital exploitation.

    The signing of this critical bill received bipartisan praise on Capitol Hill and beyond:

    Sen. Ted Cruz: “The TAKE IT DOWN ACT is an historic win for victims of revenge porn and deepfake image abuse. Predators who weaponize new technology to post this exploitative filth will now rightfully face criminal consequences, and Big Tech will no longer be allowed to turn a blind eye to the spread of this vile material. This day stands as a powerful testament to the bravery and dedication of Elliston Berry, Francesca Mani, Breeze Liu, and Brandon Guffey, whose relentless advocacy made this law possible. I am deeply grateful to my legislative partners, particularly Sen. Amy Klobuchar and First Lady Melania Trump, for their collaboration in advancing this critical legislation to protect every American’s privacy and dignity online.”

    Sen. Amy Klobuchar: “Big news: my bipartisan TAKE IT DOWN Act w/Sen. Cruz was signed into law by the President today.  It protects victims of online abuse and set some rules of the road for social media and AI. Thank you to the First Lady for her support and to the advocates who made this possible.”

    Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar: “Before this law, victims were ignored. Schools couldn’t act, police had no tools, and Big Tech looked away. With TAKE IT DOWN, that changes. Platforms must respond — and predators will face justice. Now, victims have the power and the law behind them.”

    X CEO Linda Yaccarino: “Honored to be at the @WhiteHouse today as @POTUS signed the Take It Down Act. Grateful to @FLOTUS for her dedication to ensuring safety. @X will continue to work alongside @SenTedCruz @MarshaBlackburn @RepNancyMace and @NCMEC to do everything possible to make the internet safer, especially for children.”

    South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson: “No one should have to live in fear of their most private moments being weaponized against them. Revenge porn is a cruel and deeply violating crime, and for too long, the law has lagged behind the technology. Today, with President Trump’s leadership, we’re now bringing that fight to the national stage, by standing up for survivors, holding predators accountable, and making it absolutely clear: digital abuse is real abuse, and it will be met with real consequences.”

    National Center for Missing & Exploited Children: “Today, @NCMEC_CEO, Michelle DeLaune and NCMEC’s Chief Legal Officer, Yiota Souras attended the TAKE IT DOWN Act bill signing ceremony at the White House. We’re grateful for @POTUS and @FLOTUS prioritizing this critical legislation and shining a light on child exploitation. This groundbreaking new law closes a dangerous gap by targeting the distribution of both real and digitally altered exploitative content involving children – content that may fall outside existing CSAM definitions – and requires social media platforms to take this imagery down. As the Congressionally designated national clearinghouse on missing and exploited children issues, we will continue to work with Congress and the Administration to identify evolving threats in child sexual exploitation and look forward to continuing our work together to protect children online.”

    National Organization for Women President Christian F. Nunes: “Today, President Donald Trump signed into law the Take It Down Act—the first bipartisan legislation that zeroes in on one of the most pernicious threats to women’s health and safety—the theft of our bodily autonomy through deepfake images used to harass and exploit women and girls … Today’s signing shows how much can be done when we get out of the silos that separate us from issue to issue and work together on the values and common goals that unite us despite those differences. When it comes to protecting women and girls from online abuse, this work is just beginning.”

    Sen. Marsha Blackburn: “I was pleased to be at the White House to witness the signing of The Take It Down Act, which will criminalize the distribution of nonconsensual intimate imagery. I will be working to get the Kids Online Safety Act to President Trump’s desk next to hold Big Tech accountable for failing to protect innocent children from online harms.”

    Sen. Shelley Moore Capito: “I am proud to be an original cosponsor on the TAKE IT DOWN Act. This important legislation will protect victims of digital exploitation by making non-consensual, explicit images shared online against the law. Thank you to @FLOTUS for your work on this issue and for @POTUS signing it into law today.”

    Sen. John Cornyn: “I was honored to join @POTUS + @FLOTUS at the @WhiteHouse today for the signing of the TAKE IT DOWN Act. This bill will help punish predators & protect kids from exploitation by requiring online platforms to remove explicit images, including AI generated deepfakes, within 48 hours. Happy to see this commonsense bill signed into law!”

    Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto: “I’m glad Pres. Trump signed our bipartisan TAKE IT DOWN Act today. We’ve seen how technology can deliver incredible innovations but there have to be guardrails to keep people safe. That’s why I supported this bill to protect and empower victims of real and deepfake revenge porn.”

    Sen. Roger Wicker: “The U.S. must lead in AI innovation and accountability. Today, President Trump signed the Take It Down Act. This new law protects people from AI deepfakes which often target families and children.”

    Sen. Todd Young: “Glad to see @POTUS sign our TAKE IT DOWN Act into law today to protect victims—especially young women and children—from harmful deepfakes.”

    House Majority Whip Tom Emmer: “Glad to see @POTUS sign the Take It Down Act into law. Deepfake sexual exploitation has sadly become more common with technological advancements. Thankfully, this law will hold perpetrators accountable and protect the victims of these depraved crimes.”

    House Republican Conference Chair Lisa McClain: “In America, we will not tolerate the exploitation of our children. This law will protect our children and families from becoming targets of digital predators. I’m proud to have stood alongside President Trump when he signed this important legislation into law. I look forward to continuing to support his administration and the First Lady’s efforts to hold those who create harmful content accountable, ensure that platforms take responsibility, and keep our children safe in the digital age.”

    Rep. Rick Allen: “✅ SIGNED INTO LAW: The Take It Down Act As a grandfather of 14, I was proud to support this bill in @HouseCommerce and on the House floor. Thank you to @FLOTUS for your tireless work to create a safer digital future and protect our kids from online exploitation.”

    Rep. Vern Buchanan: “President Trump has signed the TAKE IT DOWN Act into law, which protects children and victims of revenge porn from online exploitation. I was proud to help introduce this bill and vote for its passage in support of those who have been subject to this horrific violation.”

    Rep. Kat Cammack: “Glad to support the Take It Down Act and to see it signed into law today by @POTUS.”

    Rep. Ben Cline: “President Trump just signed the bipartisan TAKE IT DOWN Act into law—a major step toward removing non-consensual AI-generated deepfakes on social media. Grateful for @FLOTUS’s leadership in getting this across the finish line and protecting every American from these harmful images.”

    Rep. Debbie Dingell: “The TAKE IT DOWN ACT is now law. This is a huge win for women and children across the country. Grateful for my partners in the House and Senate who helped get this bill across the finish line and passed into law.”

    Rep. Randy Feenstra: “Thank you to President Trump for signing the TAKE IT DOWN Act to deliver the harshest punishment possible for criminals who take advantage of our kids.”

    Rep. Laura Gillen: “I was proud to vote for the bipartisan Take It Down Act and glad to see it signed into law today. No one should have to endure such a violation of privacy without protection. #TakeItDown”

    Rep. Morgan Griffith: “For me, voting for the Take It Down Act was easy. This commonsense bill protects our kids from nonconsensual online distribution of sexually explicit images.”

    Rep. Brett Guthrie: “I want to thank President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump for their steadfast leadership, as well as the millions of Americans affected by online exploitation, for their courage. As the Chairman of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, I am proud that we delivered on our commitment to advance this important legislation to protect victims of online exploitation. I want to honor Eli Heacock, and express my gratitude to his mom, Shannon Cronister-Heacock, for having the courage to share her son’s devastating story. The scourge of sexual exploitation online has upended the lives of innocent victims all across our country. The TAKE IT DOWN Act is an important step forward in protecting kids from new, 21st century threats to their well-being. This bill would not have been possible without the bravery of families like the Heacocks, and the TAKE IT DOWN Act works to ensure tragedies like this never happen again.”

    Rep. Pat Harrigan: “A few weeks ago, I voted for the TAKE IT DOWN ACT in the House. Today, it’s the law! Justice is here for the victims, and a reckoning is coming for those who thought they could get away with preying on the vulnerable.”

    Rep. Diana Harshbarger: “The Take It Down Act is a crucial step in protecting our children from predatory behavior online. I was proud to support this important legislation!”

    Rep. Kevin Hern: “I’m honored to be at the @WhiteHouse today to witness @POTUS sign the Take It Down Act into law! Earlier this year, @FLOTUS came to Capitol Hill for a roundtable that I was grateful to be a part of. We heard directly from teenagers whose lives had been destroyed by malicious AI-generated pornographic images shared on social media. This legislation will require social media sites to act as quickly as possible to remove such images from their platforms. The First Lady has been an incredible advocate for this legislation, helping to garner bipartisan support in both the House and Senate. Congratulations!”

    Rep. Young Kim: “Good news! The TAKE IT DOWN Act is now the law of the land to protect kids from online exploitation. I was proud to vote in favor of this historic, bipartisan bill on the House floor.”

    Rep. Barry Loudermilk: “Today, @POTUS signed the TAKE IT DOWN Act into law. As AI advances, so do the risks involved with it. This legislation will help children and their families to remove explicit or defamatory images posted online. In the digital age, privacy and security are vital and this is a major step.”

    Rep. Nancy Mace: “We’re at the @WhiteHouse as the Take It Down Act is signed into law. Thank you, President Trump. With the rise of AI and deepfake a*use, women and children have been left vulnerable for too long. The Take It Down Act finally gives victims real protection, and makes exploitation a crime, not a loophole.”

    Rep. Ryan Mackenzie: “Proud to attend today’s signing of the Take it Down Act. As a Pennsylvania State Representative, I helped to lead efforts to remove harmful deepfake images. Now, this law takes that fight nationwide and protects young people throughout our nation from AI-generated online exploitation.”

    Rep. Nicole Malliotakis: “Today @POTUS signed the Take It Down Act, bipartisan legislation I co-sponsored, into law! Together we’re protecting women (and men) from becoming victims of digital exploitation.”

    Rep. August Pfluger: “I just witnessed @POTUS sign the TAKE IT DOWN Act into law! This is a major step forward in protecting innocent victims and restoring online accountability, and I was proud to co-lead this legislation alongside @RepMariaSalazar.”

    Rep. Roger Williams: “Today @POTUS signed the bipartisan TAKE IT DOWN Act into law. This law will hold abusers accountable and empower victims of online abuse to have deepfake content or explicit material shared without their consent removed. We will not tolerate the exploitation of our children.”

    Attorney General Pam Bondi: “I was proud to stand with @POTUS as he signed the Take It Down Act. Thank you @FLOTUS for your work in safeguarding children from deepfake exploitation.”

    Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Scott Turner: “As @FLOTUS’ Take it Down Act is signed into law, @POTUS highlights $25 million to support foster youth aging out of the foster care system. I am proud to partner with the First Lady to provide young adults with the assistance and foundation they need to transform their lives.”

    Small Business Administration Administrator Kelly Loeffler: “Congratulations to @FLOTUS on the official signing of the Take It Down Act. This nation is so grateful for your advocacy and commitment to protecting America’s children!”

    House Republican Conference: “The Take It Down Act was signed into LAW by @POTUS!
    Congratulations to @FLOTUS, @RepMariaSalazar, and Chairman @RepGuthrie. Thank you for leading this effort to protect children from exploitation online.”

    House Energy & Commerce Committee: “This bill will protect countless Americans from entirely preventable harm online.”

    Republican Study Committee: “This is a huge win. The TAKE IT DOWN Act is critical to protecting children from non-consensual deepfakes online and holds AI abusers accountable. Thank you, President Trump!”

    Department of Homeland Security: “Thank you @POTUS Trump for continuing to prioritize America’s children by signing into law the “Take It Down Act,” to protect children from extortion. DHS is at the forefront fighting predators who try to harm and exploit our children. Make America Safe Again!”

    MIL OSI USA News