NewzIntel.com

    • Checkout Page
    • Contact Us
    • Default Redirect Page
    • Frontpage
    • Home-2
    • Home-3
    • Lost Password
    • Member Login
    • Member LogOut
    • Member TOS Page
    • My Account
    • NewzIntel Alert Control-Panel
    • NewzIntel Latest Reports
    • Post Views Counter
    • Privacy Policy
    • Public Individual Page
    • Register
    • Subscription Plan
    • Thank You Page

Category: housing

  • MIL-OSI Security: Former Corrections Officer Sentenced to Prison for Accepting Bribes in Exchange for Smuggling Narcotics Into Rikers Island

    Source: Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) State Crime News

    Matthew Podolsky, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, announced that GHISLAINE BARRIENTOS, a former corrections officer, was sentenced today to six months in prison, to be followed by six months of home detention, for her participation in a scheme to accept bribes in exchange for smuggling narcotics and other contraband into Rikers Island.  BARRIENTOS previously pled guilty before U.S. District Judge Gregory H. Woods, who imposed today’s sentence.

    Acting U.S. Attorney Matthew Podolsky said: “Ghislaine Barrientos smuggled drugs and other contraband into Rikers Island in exchange for more than ten thousand dollars in bribes. Barrientos not only abused her position of public trust as a corrections officer, she made Rikers Island less safe for inmates and officers alike.  Corrupt corrections officers have no place in our jail facilities, and this Office will continue to work to rid our jails of those who take advantage of their positions to enrich themselves.”

    As reflected in the Complaint, Information, and statements made in court:

    BARRIENTOS, a former New York City Department of Correction (“DOC”) correction officer, conspired with others to smuggle contraband, including cocaine, smokeable synthetic cannabinoids (known as “K2”), and food to inmates housed at the Robert N. Davoren Complex on Rikers Island in exchange for thousands of dollars in bribe payments.

    *               *                *

    In addition to the prison sentence, BARRIENTOS, 37, of Mount Vernon, New York, was ordered to forfeit $11,866.

    Mr. Podolsky praised the outstanding investigative work of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the New York City Department of Investigation.

    This case is being handled by the Office’s Public Corruption and Narcotics Units.  Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Coyle is in charge of the prosecution.

    MIL Security OSI –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: KE Holdings Inc. Files Its Annual Report on Form 20-F

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    BEIJING, April 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — KE Holdings Inc. (“Beike” or the “Company”) (NYSE: BEKE; HKEX: 2423), a leading integrated online and offline platform for housing transactions and services, today announced that it filed its annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on April 17, 2025. The annual report can be accessed on the Company’s investor relations website at http://investors.ke.com.

    The Company will provide a hard copy of its annual report containing the audited consolidated financial statements, free of charge, to its shareholders and ADS holders upon request. Requests should be directed to the Company’s Investor Relations Department at ir@ke.com.

    About KE Holdings Inc.

    KE Holdings Inc. is a leading integrated online and offline platform for housing transactions and services. The Company is a pioneer in building infrastructure and standards to reinvent how service providers and customers efficiently navigate and complete housing transactions and services in China, ranging from existing and new home sales, home rentals, to home renovation and furnishing, and other services. The Company owns and operates Lianjia, China’s leading real estate brokerage brand and an integral part of its Beike platform. With more than 23 years of operating experience through Lianjia since its inception in 2001, the Company believes the success and proven track record of Lianjia pave the way for it to build its infrastructure and standards and drive the rapid and sustainable growth of Beike.

    For more information, please visit: https://investors.ke.com.

    For investor and media inquiries, please contact:

    In China:
    KE Holdings Inc.
    Investor Relations
    Siting Li
    E-mail: ir@ke.com 

    Piacente Financial Communications
    Jenny Cai
    Tel: +86-10-6508-0677
    E-mail: ke@tpg-ir.com 

    In the United States:
    Piacente Financial Communications
    Brandi Piacente
    Tel: +1-212-481-2050
    E-mail: ke@tpg-ir.com

    Source: KE Holdings Inc. 

    The MIL Network –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Notice to the Annual General Meeting of Virtune AB

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Notice to the Annual General Meeting of Virtune AB

    The shareholders of Virtune AB ( Publ ) corporate ID number 559175–2067, with registered office in Stockholm, are hereby summoned to the Annual General Meeting on Wednesday, May 21, 2025 at 4:00 PM. The Annual General Meeting will not take place digitally but will take place physically at the company’s premises at Kungsgatan 26, 111 35 in Stockholm.

    Registration etc.
    Shareholders who wish to participate in the Annual General Meeting must register with the company by email no later than Friday, May 16, 2025, no later than 5:00 p.m. Registration for participation in the Annual General Meeting must be made to email: hello@virtune.com. When registering, name, address, personal or corporate identity number, telephone number and shareholding must be stated and, where applicable, the name of any assistant, proxy or deputy. Shareholders who participate via video link or are represented by proxy must issue a written, dated power of attorney for the proxy. The power of attorney should be submitted to the company well in advance of the Annual General Meeting and this can be done by email: hello@virtune.com. Anyone representing a legal entity must attach a copy of the registration certificate showing the authorized signatory. The information provided when registering will be processed and used only for the meeting.

    Proposal for agenda

    1.   Election of chairman at the meeting

    2.   Selection of one or two keepers of the minutes

    3.   Establishment and approval of the electoral roll

    4.   Approval of agenda

    5.   Examination of whether the meeting has been duly convened

    6.   Presentation of annual report and audit report

    7.   Decision on

    a)   determination of the income statement and balance sheet

    b)   dispositions regarding the company’s results according to the approved balance sheet

    c)   Discharge from liability for the board members and the CEO

    8.   Determination of the number of board members and deputies as well as auditors or registered auditing firm

    9.   Determination of remuneration for the board of directors and the auditor

    10.   Election of board of directors and auditor or registered auditing firm

    11.   Decision on principles for the appointment of Board members

    12.   Proposal for a resolution authorizing the board of directors to decide on the issue of shares and convertibles

    13.   Proposal for a decision on the adoption of a long-term incentive program for the board of directors and key personnel within Virtune AB

    PROPOSAL FOR A DECISION
    Election of chairman at the meeting (item 1)
    The Nomination Committee proposes that the Chairman of the Board, Erik Fischbeck, or, in his absence, the person appointed by the Board, be appointed Chairman of the Annual General Meeting.

    Selection of one or two adjusters (point 2)
    The Board proposes that Gert Nordin, or in the event of his absence, the person designated by the Board, be appointed to, together with the Chairman, adjust the minutes of the meeting.

    The board’s proposal for the establishment and approval of the voting list (item 3)
    The voting list proposed for approval is the voting list prepared by the company, based on the general meeting share register and advance votes received, and checked and approved by the adjuster.

    Decision on allocations regarding the company’s results according to the adopted balance sheet (item 7b)
    The Board of Directors proposes that the standing funds available for the meeting be transferred to a new account and that no dividend should therefore be paid.

    Determination of the number of board members and deputies as well as auditors or registered auditing firm (item 8)
    The Nomination Committee proposes that the board shall consist of a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 8 members and a minimum of 1 and a maximum of 2 deputies, until the time of the next Annual General Meeting and that the meeting elects 4 members and one deputy.

    The Nomination Committee proposes that a registered accounting firm be elected as auditor.

    Determination of remuneration for the board of directors and the auditor (item 9)
    The Nomination Committee proposes that the Board be remunerated as follows: A fee of 3 price base amounts, according to the level established in 2025, shall be paid to the Chairman of the Board and 2 price base amounts to members who are not operational in the company for regular board work comprising up to twelve board meetings including customary board work and preparation during the remaining period until the next Annual General Meeting.

    The Nomination Committee further proposes that the meeting authorizes the Board to approve, if necessary, consulting fees for work in addition to regular board work per current account for board members for advisory services. Consulting fees for advisory services should be paid in moderation.

    The board proposes that the auditor’s fee be paid according to an invoice approved by the board.

    Election of the board of directors and auditor or registered accounting firm (item 10)
    The Nomination Committee proposes the re-election of Erik Fischbeck, Laurent Kssis, Fredrik Djavidi and Christopher Kock. It is further proposed that Erik Fischbeck be appointed Chairman of the Board. All elections are for the period until the end of the next Annual General Meeting.

    The board is therefore proposed to consist of the following:

    • Re-election of Erik Fischbeck, Chairman of the Board
    • Re-election of Laurent Kssis, board member
    • Re-election of Fredrik Djavidi, board member
    • Re-election of Christopher Kock, board member

    Furthermore, the Nomination Committee also proposes re-election of Deputy Board Member Peter Arvidson for the period until the end of the next Annual General Meeting as Deputy Board Member.

    Nomination Committee proposes that the registered auditing firm Öhrlings Price WaterhouseCoopers AB be re-elected, for the period until the end of the next Annual General Meeting, as auditor and Öhrlings Price WaterhouseCoopers AB has appointed Johan Engstam as auditor in charge.

    Decision on principles for the appointment of Board members (item 11)
    The Nomination Committee is proposed to consist of the 3 largest shareholders as of November 30, 2025 and the Chairman of the Board. The following principles in summary are proposed to constitute principles for the appointment of Nomination Committee members.

    The Nomination Committee shall appoint a chairman from within its ranks, who may not, however, be the chairman of the board.
    The Nomination Committee shall comply with the Swedish Code of Corporate Governance to the greatest extent possible.
    majority of the members shall be independent in relation to the company and the company management. At least one member shall be independent in relation to the largest shareholder or group of shareholders in terms of votes, shareholders who cooperate in the management of the company. No remuneration shall be paid to members of the Nomination Committee.
    For more information, see Appendix 1: Virtune – NOMINATION COMMITTEE 2025.

    Proposal for a resolution authorizing the board of directors to decide on the issue of shares and convertibles (item 12)
    The Board of Directors proposes that the Annual General Meeting authorize the Board of Directors to, during the period until the next Annual General Meeting, on one or more occasions and with or without deviation from the shareholders’ preferential rights, make decisions on new issues of shares and convertible debentures. The issue of shares and convertible debentures shall only be possible against cash payment. Deviation from the shareholders’ preferential rights shall be possible for the purpose of enabling payment for the acquisition of property or shares in order to capitalize the Company and or to otherwise develop and expand the business. New issues of shares and convertible debentures shall, in the event of deviation from the shareholders’ preferential rights, be carried out on market terms and may only be carried out to a maximum total dilution of 10 percent of the total number of outstanding shares in the Company. However, new issues of shares and convertible debentures that take place in accordance with the shareholders’ preferential rights shall not be limited in any way other than what follows from the limits on the share capital and the number of shares in the articles of association applicable at any time.

    It is further proposed that the Annual General Meeting authorize the Board of Directors, the CEO or the person appointed by the Board of Directors, to make any minor adjustments to the resolution that may be deemed necessary in connection with registration of the resolution with the Swedish Companies Registration Office.

    Proposal for a resolution on the adoption of a long-term incentive program for the board of directors, management and key personnel within Virtune AB (item 13)
    The Board of Directors proposes that the Annual General Meeting authorizes the Board of Directors to introduce a long-term incentive program for the Board of Directors, management and key personnel within Virtune AB (the “Company”) (the “Option Program 2025”). Within the framework of the Option Program 2025, the Company may issue a maximum of 316,000 warrants that can be distributed among the participants. The program entails full dilution corresponding to up to approximately 5 percent of the total number of outstanding shares in the Company.

    Number of shares and votes
    As of the date of this notice, the company has a total of 6,376,960 outstanding shares, which entitle each share to one vote at the Annual General Meeting. As of the date of this notice, the company does not hold any treasury shares.

    Majority rules
    For a valid resolution according to item 12 above, approval by at least two-thirds (2/3) of both the votes cast and the shares represented at the meeting is required. For item 13, for its validity, the proposal requires the support of shareholders representing at least nine-tenths (9/10) of both the votes cast and the shares represented at the meeting.

    Information before the meeting
    The Board of Directors and the CEO shall, if requested by any shareholder and the Board of Directors believes that this can be done without material harm to the company, provide information about circumstances that may affect the assessment of an item on the agenda and circumstances that may affect the assessment of the company’s financial situation and the company’s relationship with other companies within the group. Requests for such information shall be sent by e-mail to hello@virtune.com , no later than Friday, May 16, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. The information shall also be sent within the same time to the shareholder who has so requested and who has provided his or her address.

    Documents
    Annual report documents and audit report for the financial year 2024 and other decision-making documents are available at the Company at Kungsgatan 26, 111 35 Stockholm and on the Company’s website https://virtune.com/ no later than three weeks before the meeting.

    _____________________

    Stockholm
    April 2025
    Virtune AB ( Publ )
    Board of Directors

    Attachment

    • VIRTUNE AB-_AGM_2024_-_Kallelse_utkast 3_ENG

    The MIL Network –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: YieldMax™ Launches the Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (RNTY)

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    CHICAGO and MILWAUKEE and NEW YORK, April 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — YieldMax™ announced the launch today of the following Target 12™ ETF:

    YieldMax™ Target 12™ Real Estate Option Income ETF (NYSE Arca: RNTY)

    RNTY Overview

    RNTY is an actively managed ETF that seeks a target annual income level of 12% and capital appreciation via direct investments in a select portfolio of Real Estate Companies (“Real Estate Companies”) operating in the real estate industry and other real estate related investments, including Real Estate Investment Trusts (“REITs”), and/or Real Estate ETFs. RNTY aims to generate a target annual income level of 12% primarily by selling options contracts on some or all of its Real Estate Companies.

    RNTY Equity Portfolio

    RNTY seeks capital appreciation via direct investments in its portfolio of Real Estate Companies. To enable RNTY to effectively implement its options strategies (see below), RNTY’s Adviser evaluates the liquidity of a potential company’s common stock and the liquidity of its options contracts. The Advisor will also evaluate such company’s price level and implied volatility (i.e., a measure of how much the market believes the stock price will move in the future) and will monitor these factors when determining whether to select new companies or remove existing companies from the portfolio. Any dividend paid by its Real Estate companies will contribute to RNTY’s income generation.

    RNTY Options Portfolio

    RNTY seeks to generate a target annual income level of 12% primarily by writing (selling) options contracts on some or all of its Real Estate Companies. Depending on the Advisor’s outlook, it will select one or more options strategies that it believes will best provide RNTY with current income while generally also attempting to participate in a portion of the share price increases experienced by its Real Estate Companies. By strategically entering and exiting options positions, the Advisor seeks to enhance RNTY’s income potential and performance.

    RNTY Distribution Schedule

    RNTY is the newest member of the YieldMax™ ETF family and like all YieldMax™ ETFs, RNTY aims to deliver current income to investors. RNTY’s first distribution is expected to be announced on June 3, 2025, and along with the Target 12™ ETFs, will thereafter aim to announce its distributions on the first Tuesday of every month.

    Why Invest in RNTY?

    • RNTY seeks to generate a target annual income level of 12%, which is not dependent on the value of its portfolio of Real Estate Companies.
    • RNTY seeks to participate in some of the potential share price gains experienced by its Real Estate Companies.

    Please see the table below for distribution and yield information for all outstanding YieldMax™ ETFs.

    ETF Ticker1 ETF Name Distribution Frequency Distribution per Share Distribution Rate2,4 30-Day
    SEC Yield3
    ROC5
    CHPY YieldMax™ Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF Weekly $0.3627 – – 84.42%
    GPTY YieldMax™ AI & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF Weekly $0.2545 35.61% 0.00% 63.04%
    LFGY YieldMax™ Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF Weekly $0.4307 65.56% 0.00% 35.49%
    QDTY YieldMax™ Nasdaq 100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF Weekly $0.3320 45.17% 0.00% 100.00%
    RDTY YieldMax™ R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF Weekly $0.3745 46.99% 0.00% 100.00%
    SDTY YieldMax™ S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF Weekly $0.3085 39.77% 0.00% 100.00%
    ULTY YieldMax™ Ultra Option Income Strategy ETF Weekly $0.0852 78.42% 2.21% 99.18%
    YMAG YieldMax™ Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs Weekly $0.0943 35.03% 69.89% 65.96%
    YMAX YieldMax™ Universe Fund of Option Income ETFs Weekly $0.1334 55.21% 96.57% 54.97%
    BIGY YieldMax™ Target 12™ Big 50 Option Income ETF Monthly $0.4582 12.78% 0.71% 0.00%
    SOXY YieldMax™ Target 12™ Semiconductor Option Income ETF Monthly $0.4266 12.95% 0.26% 0.00%
    ABNY YieldMax™ ABNB Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.3665 42.28% 3.62% 0.00%
    AIYY YieldMax™ AI Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.2301 69.42% 4.89% 93.15%
    AMDY YieldMax™ AMD Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.2765 54.51% 2.97% 93.13%
    AMZY YieldMax™ AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.4877 43.74% 4.40% 89.31%
    APLY YieldMax™ AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.3023 29.68% 3.44% 44.35%
    BABO YieldMax™ BABA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.7578 61.39% 1.92% 0.00%
    CONY YieldMax™ COIN Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.4381 79.15% 4.42% 94.62%
    CRSH YieldMax™ Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.5616 97.15% 1.79% 0.00%
    CVNY YieldMax™ CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $2.9684 108.50% 2.44% 99.08%
    DIPS YieldMax™ Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.5851 61.83% 2.36% 96.87%
    DISO YieldMax™ DIS Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.3254 35.28% 4.03% 0.00%
    FBY YieldMax™ META Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.5506 50.96% 4.38% 0.00%
    FEAT YieldMax™ Dorsey Wright Featured 5 Income ETF Every 4 weeks $1.6435 62.08% 108.54% 0.00%
    FIAT YieldMax™ Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.9240 140.28% 1.73% 98.90%
    FIVY YieldMax™ Dorsey Wright Hybrid 5 Income ETF Every 4 weeks $1.0283 38.27% 69.37% 0.00%
    GDXY YieldMax™ Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.6394 48.17% 2.77% 0.00%
    GOOY YieldMax™ GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.3729 40.79% 4.67% 90.74%
    JPMO YieldMax™ JPM Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.3717 31.55% 4.01% 42.17%
    MARO YieldMax™ MARA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $1.4783 89.19% 4.90% 95.22%
    MRNY YieldMax™ MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.1827 93.80% 4.65% 94.71%
    MSFO YieldMax™ MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.3337 28.35% 3.75% 0.00%
    MSTY YieldMax™ MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $1.3356 83.27% 0.50% 0.48%
    NFLY YieldMax™ NFLX Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.6020 46.74% 3.58% 59.10%
    NVDY YieldMax™ NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.7874 70.46% 4.01% 100.00%
    OARK YieldMax™ Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.2923 52.35% 3.51% 93.61%
    PLTY YieldMax™ PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $5.3257 118.21% 2.78% 97.91%
    PYPY YieldMax™ PYPL Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.3521 38.50% 4.19% 0.00%
    SMCY YieldMax™ SMCI Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $1.5012 108.91% 3.01% 67.02%
    SNOY YieldMax™ SNOW Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.6864 60.19% 3.01% 94.51%
    TSLY YieldMax™ TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.6598 106.59% 3.87% 96.85%
    TSMY YieldMax™ TSM Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.5635 53.48% 3.61% 16.38%
    WNTR* YieldMax™ Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks – – – –
    XOMO YieldMax™ XOM Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.3500 34.72% 3.18% 90.74%
    XYZY YieldMax™ XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.4412 56.34% 6.32% 89.82%
    YBIT YieldMax™ Bitcoin Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.4110 52.74% 1.52% 30.49%
    YQQQ YieldMax™ Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF Every 4 weeks $0.4437 33.17% 3.08% 0.00%


    Performance data quoted represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. Investment return and principal value of an investment will fluctuate so that an investor’s shares, when sold or redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost and current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted above. Performance current to the most recent month-end can be obtained by calling 
    (833) 378-0717.

    Note: DIPS, FIAT, CRSH, YQQQ and WNTR are hereinafter referred to as the “Short ETFs.”

    Distributions are not guaranteed. The Distribution Rate and 30-Day SEC Yield are not indicative of future distributions, if any, on the ETFs. In particular, future distributions on any ETF may differ significantly from its Distribution Rate or 30-Day SEC Yield. You are not guaranteed a distribution under the ETFs. Distributions for the ETFs (if any) are variable and may vary significantly from period to period and may be zero. Accordingly, the Distribution Rate and 30-Day SEC Yield will change over time, and such change may be significant.

    Investors in the Funds will not have rights to receive dividends or other distributions with respect to the underlying reference asset(s).

    *The inception date for WNTR is March 26, 2025.

    1All YieldMax™ ETFs shown in the table above (except YMAX, YMAG, FEAT, FIVY and ULTY) have a gross expense ratio of 0.99%. YMAX, YMAG and FEAT have a Management Fee of 0.29% and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses of 0.99% for a gross expense ratio of 1.28%. FIVY has a Management Fee of 0.29% and Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses of 0.59% for a gross expense ratio of 0.88%. “Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses” are indirect fees and expenses that the Fund incurs from investing in the shares of other investment companies, namely other YieldMax™ ETFs. ULTY has a gross expense ratio after the fee waiver of 1.30%. The Advisor has agreed to a fee waiver of 0.10% through at least February 28, 2026.
    2The Distribution Rate shown is as of close on April 16, 2025. The Distribution Rate is the annual distribution rate an investor would receive if the most recent distribution, which includes option income, remained the same going forward. The Distribution Rate is calculated by annualizing an ETF’s Distribution per Share and dividing such annualized amount by the ETF’s most recent NAV. The Distribution Rate represents a single distribution from the ETF and does not represent its total return. Distributions may also include a combination of ordinary dividends, capital gain, and return of investor capital, which may decrease an ETF’s NAV and trading price over time. As a result, an investor may suffer significant losses to their investment. These Distribution Rates may be caused by unusually favorable market conditions and may not be sustainable. Such conditions may not continue to exist and there should be no expectation that this performance may be repeated in the future.
    3The 30-Day SEC Yield represents net investment income, which excludes option income, earned by such ETF over the 30-Day period ended March 31, 2025, expressed as an annual percentage rate based on such ETF’s share price at the end of the 30-Day period.
    4Each ETF’s strategy (except those of the Short ETFs) will cap potential gains if its reference asset’s shares increase in value, yet subjects an investor to all potential losses if the reference asset’s shares decrease in value. Such potential losses may not be offset by income received by the ETF. Each Short ETF’s strategy will cap potential gains if its reference asset decreases in value, yet subjects an investor to all potential losses if the reference asset increases in value. Such potential losses may not be offset by income received by the ETF.
    5ROC refers to Return of Capital. The ROC percentage is the portion of the distribution that represents an investor’s original investment.

    Each Fund has a limited operating history and while each Fund’s objective is to provide current income, there is no guarantee the Fund will make a distribution. Distributions are likely to vary greatly in amount.

    Standardized Performance

    For YMAX, click here. For YMAG, click here. For TSLY, click here. For OARK, click here. For APLY, click here. For NVDY, click here. For AMZY, click here. For FBY, click here. For GOOY, click here. For NFLY, click here. For CONY, click here. For MSFO, click here. For DISO, click here. For XOMO, click here. For JPMO, click here. For AMDY, click here. For PYPY, click here. For XYZY, click here. For MRNY, click here. For AIYY, click here. For MSTY, click here. For ULTY, click here. For YBIT, click here. For CRSH, click here. For GDXY, click here. For SNOY, click here. For ABNY, click here. For FIAT, click here. For DIPS, click here. For BABO, click here. For YQQQ, click here. For TSMY, click here. For SMCY, click here. For PLTY, click here. For BIGY, click here. For SOXY, click here. For MARO, click here. For FEAT, click here. For FIVY, click here. For LFGY, click here. For GPTY, click here. For CVNY, click here. For SDTY, click here. For QDTY, click here. For RDTY, click here. For WNTR, click here. For CHPY, click here.

    Important Information

    This material must be preceded or accompanied by the prospectus. For all prospectuses, click here.

    Tidal Financial Group is the adviser for all YieldMax™ ETFs.

    THE FUND, TRUST, AND ADVISER ARE NOT AFFILIATED WITH ANY UNDERLYING REFERENCE ASSET.

    Risk Disclosures

    Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.

    Referenced Index Risk. The Fund invests in options contracts that are based on the value of the Index (or the Index ETFs). This subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it owned shares of companies that comprised the Index or an ETF that tracks the Index, even though it does not.

    Indirect Investment Risk. The Index is not affiliated with the Trust, the Fund, the Adviser, or their respective affiliates and is not involved with this offering in any way. Investors in the Fund will not have the right to receive dividends or other distributions or any other rights with respect to the companies that comprise the Index but will be subject to declines in the performance of the Index.

    Russell 2000 Index Risks. The Index, which consists of small-cap U.S. companies, is particularly susceptible to economic changes, as these firms often have less financial resilience than larger companies. Market volatility can disproportionately affect these smaller businesses, leading to significant price swings. Additionally, these companies are often more exposed to specific industry risks and have less diverse revenue streams. They can also be more vulnerable to changes in domestic regulatory or policy environments.

    Call Writing Strategy Risk. The path dependency (i.e., the continued use) of the Fund’s call writing strategy will impact the extent that the Fund participates in the positive price returns of the underlying reference asset and, in turn, the Fund’s returns, both during the term of the sold call options and over longer periods.

    Counterparty Risk. The Fund is subject to counterparty risk by virtue of its investments in options contracts. Transactions in some types of derivatives, including options, are required to be centrally cleared (“cleared derivatives”). In a transaction involving cleared derivatives, the Fund’s counterparty is a clearing house rather than a bank or broker. Since the Fund is not a member of clearing houses and only members of a clearing house (“clearing members”) can participate directly in the clearing house, the Fund will hold cleared derivatives through accounts at clearing members.

    Derivatives Risk. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, or funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. The Fund’s investments in derivatives may pose risks in addition to, and greater than, those associated with directly investing in securities or other ordinary investments, including risk related to the market, imperfect correlation with underlying investments or the Fund’s other Index (or ETFs that track the Index’s performance)holdings, higher price volatility, lack of availability, counterparty risk, liquidity, valuation and legal restrictions.

    Options Contracts. The use of options contracts involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary Index (or ETFs that track the Index’s performance) securities transactions. The prices of options are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in the value of the underlying instrument, including the anticipated volatility, which are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political, changes in the actual or implied volatility or the reference asset, the time remaining until the expiration of the option contract and economic events.

    Distribution Risk. As part of the Fund’s investment objective, the Fund seeks to provide current income. There is no assurance that the Fund will make a distribution in any given period. If the Fund does make distributions, the amounts of such distributions will likely vary greatly from one distribution to the next. Additionally, monthly distributions, if any, may consist of returns of capital, which would decrease the Fund’s NAV and trading price over time.

    High Index (or Index ETF) Turnover Risk. The Fund may actively and frequently trade all or a significant portion of the Fund’s holdings. A high Index (or Index ETF) turnover rate increases transaction costs, which may increase the Fund’s expenses.

    Liquidity Risk. Some securities held by the Fund, including options contracts, may be difficult to sell or be illiquid, particularly during times of market turmoil.

    Non-Diversification Risk. Because the Fund is “non-diversified,” it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund.

    New Fund Risk. The Fund is a recently organized management investment company with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors do not have a track record or history on which to base their investment decisions.

    Price Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of call option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will participate in increases in value experienced by the underlying reference asset over the Call Period.

    Inflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the present value of the Fund’s assets and distributions, if any, may decline.

    Single Issuer Risk. Issuer-specific attributes may cause an investment in the Fund to be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment which diversifies risk or the market generally. The value of the Fund, which focuses on an individual security (ARKK, TSLA, AAPL, NVDA, AMZN, META, GOOGL, NFLX, COIN, MSFT, DIS, XOM, JPM, AMD, PYPL, SQ, MRNA, AI, MSTR, Bitcoin ETP, GDX®, SNOW, ABNB, BABA, TSM, SMCI, PLTR, MARA, CVNA), may be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole and may perform differently from the value of a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to GPTY)

    Artificial Intelligence Risk. Issuers engaged in artificial intelligence typically have high research and capital expenditures and, as a result, their profitability can vary widely, if they are profitable at all. The space in which they are engaged is highly competitive and issuers’ products and services may become obsolete very quickly. These companies are heavily dependent on intellectual property rights and may be adversely affected by loss or impairment of those rights. The issuers are also subject to legal, regulatory and political changes that may have a large impact on their profitability. A failure in an issuer’s product or even questions about the safety of the product could be devastating to the issuer, especially if it is the marquee product of the issuer. It can be difficult to accurately capture what qualifies as an artificial intelligence company.

    Technology Sector Risk. The Fund will invest substantially in companies in the information technology sector, and therefore the performance of the Fund could be negatively impacted by events affecting this sector. Market or economic factors impacting technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technological advances could have a significant effect on the value of the Fund’s investments. The value of stocks of information technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technology is particularly vulnerable to rapid changes in technology product cycles, rapid product obsolescence, government regulation and competition, both domestically and internationally, including competition from foreign competitors with lower production costs. Stocks of information technology companies and companies that rely heavily on technology, especially those of smaller, less-seasoned companies, tend to be more volatile than the overall market. Information technology companies are heavily dependent on patent and intellectual property rights, the loss or impairment of which may adversely affect profitability.

    Risk Disclosure (applicable only to MARO)

    Digital Assets Risk: The Fund does not invest directly in Bitcoin or any other digital assets. The Fund does not invest directly in derivatives that track the performance of Bitcoin or any other digital assets. The Fund does not invest in or seek direct exposure to the current “spot” or cash price of Bitcoin. Investors seeking direct exposure to the price of Bitcoin should consider an investment other than the Fund. Digital assets like Bitcoin, designed as mediums of exchange, are still an emerging asset class. They operate independently of any central authority or government backing and are subject to regulatory changes and extreme price volatility.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to BABO and TSMY)

    Currency Risk: Indirect exposure to foreign currencies subjects the Fund to the risk that currencies will decline in value relative to the U.S. dollar. Currency rates in foreign countries may fluctuate significantly over short periods of time for a number of reasons, including changes in interest rates and the imposition of currency controls or other political developments in the U.S. or abroad.

    Depositary Receipts Risk: The securities underlying BABO and TSMY are American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”). Investment in ADRs may be less liquid than the underlying shares in their primary trading market.

    Foreign Market and Trading Risk: The trading markets for many foreign securities are not as active as U.S. markets and may have less governmental regulation and oversight.

    Foreign Securities Risk: Investments in securities of non-U.S. issuers involve certain risks that may not be present with investments in securities of U.S. issuers, such as risk of loss due to foreign currency fluctuations or to political or economic instability, as well as varying regulatory requirements applicable to investments in non-U.S. issuers. There may be less information publicly available about a non-U.S. issuer than a U.S. issuer. Non-U.S. issuers may also be subject to different regulatory, accounting, auditing, financial reporting and investor protection standards than U.S. issuers.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to GDXY)

    Risk of Investing in Foreign Securities. The Fund is exposed indirectly to the securities of foreign issuers selected by GDX®’s investment adviser, which subjects the Fund to the risks associated with such companies. Investments in the securities of foreign issuers involve risks beyond those associated with investments in U.S. securities.

    Risk of Investing in Gold and Silver Mining Companies. The Fund is exposed indirectly to gold and silver mining companies selected by GDX®’s investment adviser, which subjects the Fund to the risks associated with such companies.

    The Fund invests in options contracts based on the value of the VanEck Gold Miners ETF (GDX®), which subjects the Fund to some of the same risks as if it owned GDX®, as well as the risks associated with Canadian, Australian and Emerging Market Issuers, and Small-and Medium-Capitalization companies.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to YBIT)

    YBIT does not invest directly in Bitcoin or any other digital assets. YBIT does not invest directly in derivatives that track the performance of Bitcoin or any other digital assets. YBIT does not invest in or seek direct exposure to the current “spot” or cash price of Bitcoin. Investors seeking direct exposure to the price of Bitcoin should consider an investment other than YBIT.

    Bitcoin Investment Risk: The Fund’s indirect investment in Bitcoin, through holdings in one or more Underlying ETPs, exposes it to the unique risks of this emerging innovation. Bitcoin’s price is highly volatile, and its market is influenced by the changing Bitcoin network, fluctuating acceptance levels, and unpredictable usage trends.

    Digital Assets Risk: Digital assets like Bitcoin, designed as mediums of exchange, are still an emerging asset class. They operate independently of any central authority or government backing and are subject to regulatory changes and extreme price volatility. Potentially No 1940 Act Protections. As of the date of this Prospectus, there is only a single eligible Underlying ETP, and it is an investment company subject to the 1940 Act.

    Bitcoin ETP Risk: The Fund invests in options contracts that are based on the value of the Bitcoin ETP. This subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it owned shares of the Bitcoin ETP, even though it does not. Bitcoin ETPs are subject, but not limited, to significant risk and heightened volatility. An investor in a Bitcoin ETP may lose their entire investment. Bitcoin ETPs are not suitable for all investors. In addition, not all Bitcoin ETPs are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Those Bitcoin ETPs that are not registered under such statute are therefore not subject to the same regulations as exchange traded products that are so registered.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to the Short ETFs)

    Investing involves risk. Principal loss is possible.

    Price Appreciation Risk. As part of the Fund’s synthetic covered put strategy, the Fund purchases and sells call and put option contracts that are based on the value of the underlying reference asset. This strategy subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it shorted the underlying reference asset, even though it does not. By virtue of the Fund’s indirect inverse exposure to changes in the value of the underlying reference asset, the Fund is subject to the risk that the value of the underlying reference asset increases. If the value of the underlying reference asset increases, the Fund will likely lose value and, as a result, the Fund may suffer significant losses.

    Put Writing Strategy Risk. The path dependency (i.e., the continued use) of the Fund’s put writing (selling) strategy will impact the extent that the Fund participates in decreases in the value of the underlying reference asset and, in turn, the Fund’s returns, both during the term of the sold put options and over longer periods.

    Purchased OTM Call Options Risk. The Fund’s strategy is subject to potential losses if the underlying reference asset increases in value, which may not be offset by the purchase of out-of-the-money (OTM) call options. The Fund purchases OTM calls to seek to manage (cap) the Fund’s potential losses from the Fund’s short exposure to the underlying reference asset if it appreciates significantly in value. However, the OTM call options will cap the Fund’s losses only to the extent that the value of the underlying reference asset increases to a level that is at or above the strike level of the purchased OTM call options. Any increase in the value of the underlying reference asset to a level that is below the strike level of the purchased OTM call options will result in a corresponding loss for the Fund. For example, if the OTM call options have a strike level that is approximately 100% above the then-current value of the underlying reference asset at the time of the call option purchase, and the value of the underlying reference asset increases by at least 100% during the term of the purchased OTM call options, the Fund will lose all its value. Since the Fund bears the costs of purchasing the OTM calls, such costs will decrease the Fund’s value and/or any income otherwise generated by the Fund’s investment strategy.

    Counterparty Risk. The Fund is subject to counterparty risk by virtue of its investments in options contracts. Transactions in some types of derivatives, including options, are required to be centrally cleared (“cleared derivatives”). In a transaction involving cleared derivatives, the Fund’s counterparty is a clearing house rather than a bank or broker. Since the Fund is not a member of clearing houses and only members of a clearing house (“clearing members”) can participate directly in the clearing house, the Fund will hold cleared derivatives through accounts at clearing members.

    Derivatives Risk. Derivatives are financial instruments that derive value from the underlying reference asset or assets, such as stocks, bonds, or funds (including ETFs), interest rates or indexes. The Fund’s investments in derivatives may pose risks in addition to, and greater than, those associated with directly investing in securities or other ordinary investments, including risk related to the market, imperfect correlation with underlying investments or the Fund’s other portfolio holdings, higher price volatility, lack of availability, counterparty risk, liquidity, valuation and legal restrictions.

    Options Contracts. The use of options contracts involves investment strategies and risks different from those associated with ordinary portfolio securities transactions. The prices of options are volatile and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in the value of the underlying reference asset, including the anticipated volatility, which are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political, changes in the actual or implied volatility or the reference asset, the time remaining until the expiration of the option contract and economic events.

    Distribution Risk. As part of the Fund’s investment objective, the Fund seeks to provide current income. There is no assurance that the Fund will make a distribution in any given period. If the Fund does make distributions, the amounts of such distributions will likely vary greatly from one distribution to the next.

    High Portfolio Turnover Risk. The Fund may actively and frequently trade all or a significant portion of the Fund’s holdings.

    Liquidity Risk. Some securities held by the Fund, including options contracts, may be difficult to sell or be illiquid, particularly during times of market turmoil.

    Non-Diversification Risk. Because the Fund is “non-diversified,” it may invest a greater percentage of its assets in the securities of a single issuer or a smaller number of issuers than if it was a diversified fund.

    New Fund Risk. The Fund is a recently organized management investment company with no operating history. As a result, prospective investors do not have a track record or history on which to base their investment decisions.

    Price Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of put option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will participate in decreases in value experienced by the underlying reference asset over the Put Period.

    Single Issuer Risk. Issuer-specific attributes may cause an investment in the Fund to be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment which diversifies risk or the market generally. The value of the Fund, for any Fund that focuses on an individual security (e.g., TSLA, COIN, NVDA, MSTR), may be more volatile than a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole and may perform differently from the value of a traditional pooled investment or the market as a whole.

    Inflation Risk. Inflation risk is the risk that the value of assets or income from investments will be less in the future as inflation decreases the value of money. As inflation increases, the present value of the Fund’s assets and distributions, if any, may decline.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to CHPY)

    Semiconductor Industry Risk. Semiconductor companies may face intense competition, both domestically and internationally, and such competition may have an adverse effect on their profit margins. Semiconductor companies may have limited product lines, markets, financial resources or personnel. Semiconductor companies’ supply chain and operations are dependent on the availability of materials that meet exacting standards and the use of third parties to provide components and services.

    The products of semiconductor companies may face obsolescence due to rapid technological developments and frequent new product introduction, unpredictable changes in growth rates and competition for the services of qualified personnel. Capital equipment expenditures could be substantial, and equipment generally suffers from rapid obsolescence. Companies in the semiconductor industry are heavily dependent on patent and intellectual property rights. The loss or impairment of these rights would adversely affect the profitability of these companies.

    Risk Disclosures (applicable only to YQQQ)

    Index Overview. The Nasdaq 100 Index is a benchmark index that includes 100 of the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market, based on market capitalization.

    Index Level Appreciation Risk. As part of the Fund’s synthetic covered put strategy, the Fund purchases and sells call and put option contracts that are based on the Index level. This strategy subjects the Fund to certain of the same risks as if it shorted the Index, even though it does not. By virtue of the Fund’s indirect inverse exposure to changes in the Index level, the Fund is subject to the risk that the Index level increases. If the Index level increases, the Fund will likely lose value and, as a result, the Fund may suffer significant losses. The Fund may also be subject to the following risks: innovation and technological advancement; strong market presence of Index constituent companies; adaptability to global market trends; and resilience and recovery potential.

    Index Level Participation Risk. The Fund employs an investment strategy that includes the sale of put option contracts, which limits the degree to which the Fund will benefit from decreases in the Index level experienced over the Put Period. This means that if the Index level experiences a decrease in value below the strike level of the sold put options during a Put Period, the Fund will likely not experience that increase to the same extent and any Fund gains may significantly differ from the level of the Index losses over the Put Period. Additionally, because the Fund is limited in the degree to which it will participate in decreases in value experienced by the Index level over each Put Period, but has significant negative exposure to any increases in value experienced by the Index level over the Put Period, the NAV of the Fund may decrease over any given period. The Fund’s NAV is dependent on the value of each options portfolio, which is based principally upon the inverse of the performance of the Index level. The Fund’s ability to benefit from the Index level decreases will depend on prevailing market conditions, especially market volatility, at the time the Fund enters into the sold put option contracts and will vary from Put Period to Put Period. The value of the options contracts is affected by changes in the value and dividend rates of component companies that comprise the Index, changes in interest rates, changes in the actual or perceived volatility of the Index and the remaining time to the options’ expiration, as well as trading conditions in the options market. As the Index level changes and time moves towards the expiration of each Put Period, the value of the options contracts, and therefore the Fund’s NAV, will change. However, it is not expected for the Fund’s NAV to directly inversely correlate on a day-to-day basis with the returns of the Index level. The amount of time remaining until the options contract’s expiration date affects the impact that the value of the options contracts has on the Fund’s NAV, which may not be in full effect until the expiration date of the Fund’s options contracts. Therefore, while changes in the Index level will result in changes to the Fund’s NAV, the Fund generally anticipates that the rate of change in the Fund’s NAV will be different than the inverse of the changes experienced by the Index level.

    YieldMax™ ETFs are distributed by Foreside Fund Services, LLC. Foreside is not affiliated with Tidal Financial Group, or YieldMax™ ETFs.

    © 2025 YieldMax™ ETFs

    The MIL Network –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: KE Holdings Inc. to Hold Annual General Meeting on June 13, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    BEIJING, April 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — KE Holdings Inc. (“Beike” or the “Company”) (NYSE: BEKE; HKEX: 2423), a leading integrated online and offline platform for housing transactions and services, today announced that it will hold an annual general meeting of the Company’s shareholders (the “AGM”) at 10:00 a.m. Beijing time on Friday, June 13, 2025 at Oriental Electronic Technology Building, No. 2 Chuangye Road, Haidian District, Beijing, PRC, for the purposes of considering and, if thought fit, passing each of the Proposed Resolutions as defined and set forth in the notice of the AGM (the “AGM Notice”). A circular of the Company dated April 17, 2025 in relation to the AGM, the AGM Notice and the form of proxy for the AGM are available on the Company’s website at https://investors.ke.com/. The board of directors of the Company fully supports the Proposed Resolutions and recommends that shareholders and holders of American depositary shares (“ADSs”) of the Company vote in favor of the Proposed Resolutions.

    Holders of record of the Company’s ordinary shares as of the close of business on May 13, 2025, Hong Kong time, are entitled to receive notice of, and to attend and vote at, the AGM or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Holders of record of ADSs as of the close of business on May 13, 2025, New York time, who wish to exercise their voting rights for the underlying Class A ordinary shares must give voting instructions to The Bank of New York Mellon, the depositary of the ADSs, if the ADSs are held by holders on the books and records of the depositary, or indirectly through a bank, brokerage or other securities intermediary, if the ADSs are held by any of them on behalf of holders of the ADSs.

    The Company has filed its annual report on Form 20-F, including its audited financial statements, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The Company’s annual report on Form 20-F can be accessed on the Company’s website at https://investors.ke.com/ and on the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.

    About KE Holdings Inc.

    KE Holdings Inc. is a leading integrated online and offline platform for housing transactions and services. The Company is a pioneer in building infrastructure and standards to reinvent how service providers and customers efficiently navigate and complete housing transactions and services in China, ranging from existing and new home sales, home rentals, to home renovation and furnishing, and other services. The Company owns and operates Lianjia, China’s leading real estate brokerage brand and an integral part of its Beike platform. With more than 23 years of operating experience through Lianjia since its inception in 2001, the Company believes the success and proven track record of Lianjia pave the way for it to build its infrastructure and standards and drive the rapid and sustainable growth of Beike.

    Safe Harbor Statement

    This press release contains statements that may constitute “forward-looking” statements pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “will,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “aims,” “future,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “likely to,” and similar statements. Beike may also make written or oral forward-looking statements in its periodic reports to the SEC and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited (the “Hong Kong Stock Exchange”), in its annual report to shareholders, in press releases and other written materials and in oral statements made by its officers, directors or employees to third parties. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about KE Holdings Inc.’s beliefs, plans, and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement, including but not limited to the following: Beike’s goals and strategies; Beike’s future business development, financial condition and results of operations; expected changes in the Company’s revenues, costs or expenditures; Beike’s ability to empower services and facilitate transactions on Beike platform; competition in the industry in which Beike operates; relevant government policies and regulations relating to the industry; Beike’s ability to protect the Company’s systems and infrastructures from cyber-attacks; Beike’s dependence on the integrity of brokerage brands, stores and agents on the Company’s platform; general economic and business conditions in China and globally; and assumptions underlying or related to any of the foregoing. Further information regarding these and other risks is included in KE Holdings Inc.’s filings with the SEC and the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. All information provided in this press release is as of the date of this press release, and KE Holdings Inc. does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement, except as required under applicable law.

    For more information, please visit: https://investors.ke.com.

    For investor and media inquiries, please contact:

    In China:
    KE Holdings Inc.
    Investor Relations
    Siting Li
    E-mail: ir@ke.com 

    Piacente Financial Communications
    Jenny Cai
    Tel: +86-10-6508-0677
    E-mail: ke@tpg-ir.com 

    In the United States:
    Piacente Financial Communications
    Brandi Piacente
    Tel: +1-212-481-2050
    E-mail: ke@tpg-ir.com

    Source: KE Holdings Inc. 

    The MIL Network –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Urban renewal draft plan approved

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    With the Chief Executive in Council approving the draft Urban Renewal Authority Sai Yee Street/Flower Market Road Development Scheme Plan(DSP), the Town Planning Board said it provides a statutory land use planning framework to guide the plan’s implementation.

    The development scheme area, covering about 29,315 sq m, is designated as “Other Specified Use” annotated “Mixed Use (1)” and “Other Specified Use” annotated “Mixed Use (2)”.

    By adopting the “linked-site” approach and the “Single Site, Multiple Use” model, the DSP intends to achieve a holistic replanning of land uses in the Sai Yee Street/Flower Market Road area through redevelopment of various existing Government, Institution or Community (G/IC) facilities with adjoining urban fabric for a comprehensive mixed-use development.

    A combination of various types of compatible uses includes residential, hotel, office, retail, G/IC, a sizeable public open space, cultural, recreational and entertainment uses.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Allen Parish, Louisiana Flood Maps Become Final

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: Allen Parish, Louisiana Flood Maps Become Final

    Allen Parish, Louisiana Flood Maps Become Final

    DENTON, Texas – New flood maps have been finalized and will become effective on Oct

    16, 2025, for Allen Parish, Louisiana

    During the next six months, a FEMA compliance specialist will work with the community to update each floodplain ordinance and adopt these new flood maps

     Residents are encouraged to examine the maps to determine if they are in a low-to-moderate or high-risk flood zone

    The current and future Flood Insurance Rate Map can be viewed on FEMA’s Flood Map Changes Viewer at https://msc

    fema

    gov/fmcv

    By understanding flood risks, individuals can decide which insurance option is best for their situation

    Community leaders can use these maps to make informed decisions about building standards and development to help lessen the impacts of a flooding event

    Anyone without flood insurance risks uninsured losses to their home, personal property and business

    Flood insurance is available either through a private policy or through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) for those in communities who participate in the NFIP

    Residents with federally backed mortgages must have flood insurance if their structures are in the Special Flood Hazard Area

    Contact your local floodplain administrator (FPA) to review the new flood maps and learn more about your risk of flooding

    A FEMA Map Specialist can help identify your community FPA and answer questions about the maps as well

    Contact them by phone or online chat

    Use a live chat service about flood maps at floodmaps

    fema

    gov/fhm/fmx_main

    html (just click on the “Live Chat Open” icon)

    Contact a FEMA Map Specialist by telephone at 877-FEMA-MAP (877-336-2627) or by email at FEMA-FMIX@fema

    dhs

    gov

    There are cost-saving options available for those newly mapped into a high-risk flood zone

    Learn more about your flood insurance options by talking with your insurance agent or visiting floodsmart

    gov

    toan

    nguyen
    Wed, 04/16/2025 – 22:25

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Scrub Jay at the Vehicle Assembly Building

    Source: NASA

    A scrub jay perches on a branch near the Vehicle Assembly Building at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida on June 22, 2020. Kennedy shares space with the Merritt Island National Wildlife Refuge, which is home to more than 65 amphibian and reptile, 25 mammal, 117 fish, and 330 bird species.
    At the time this photo was taken, the NASA “meatball” logo – in the background here – on the Vehicle Assembly Building was being repainted. This iconic building is where the Artemis launch vehicles are stacked and processed in preparation for future missions to the Moon.
    Image credit: NASA/Ben Smegelsky

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: How to Document Damages After Severe Weather Events

    Source: US Federal Emergency Management Agency

    Headline: How to Document Damages After Severe Weather Events

    How to Document Damages After Severe Weather Events

    FRANKFORT, Ky

    – FEMA understands that clean up and rebuilding after a flood can take time and be overwhelming

    Guidance is available and it’s always important to put safety first

    Follow instructions from your local officials to ensure it is safe to reenter your home

    You can begin the recovery process by documenting damage and taking steps to stop the spread of mold

    First, confirm the electricity and gas are shut off to avoid fire or injury

    Have an electrician check the house before turning the power back on

     Document Your Flood DamageTake photos and videos of the damage, including structural and personal property on the inside and outside of your home, before discarding items

    Remember to take photos of the insides of closets and cabinets

    Record serial numbers of large appliances, such as washers, dryers, and refrigerators

    Keep receipts of any purchases made to replace damaged property or repair property

    Retain material samples of damaged items such as carpeting, wallpaper, furniture upholstery, and window treatments

     The type and quality of material may impact insurance claims

    Contact repair services as necessary to address damage to the building’s electrical, water, or HVAC systems

    Consult your insurance adjuster or insurance company before you sign any cleaning, remediation, or maintenance agreement

    After taking photos, you should immediately throw away flooded items that pose a health risk, such as perishable food items, clothing, cushions, and pillows

    Mold and CleanupIt is important to understand that National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) flood insurance policies will not cover damage from mold

    Avoiding damage from mold is an important responsibility of a resident

    Building owners are strongly encouraged to begin cleanup and documentation immediately after a flood to prevent the growth and spread of mold

    Remember these guidelines while undergoing mold cleanup:Wear personal protective equipment

    Wear an N-95 respirator at a minimum, goggles, and protective gloves

    Use portable generators carefully, outside and away from the home, to avoid carbon monoxide poisoning and fires

    Ensure the mold cleanup is complete before reoccupying your home

    For more information, please see the Homeowner’s and Renter’s Guide to Mold Cleanup after Disasters (pdf)

    martyce

    allenjr
    Wed, 04/16/2025 – 19:38

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: 10 persons arrested during anti-illegal worker operations (with photo)

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

         The Immigration Department (ImmD) mounted a series of territory-wide anti-illegal worker operations codenamed “Twilight”, and joint operations with the Hong Kong Police Force codenamed “Champion”, for three consecutive days from April 14 to yesterday (April 16). A total of eight suspected illegal workers and two overstayers were arrested.
     
         During the anti-illegal worker operations, ImmD Task Force officers raided 17 target locations including commercial buildings, residential buildings and restaurants, and arrested two suspected illegal workers. The arrested suspected illegal workers comprised two women, aged 41 and 43.
     
         During operations “Champion”, enforcement officers raided 55 target locations in Central, Eastern and Western districts. Six suspected illegal workers and two overstayers were arrested. The arrested suspected illegal workers comprised four men and two women, aged 29 to 55. The arrested overstayers comprised one man and one woman, aged 46 and 49.
     
         An ImmD spokesman said, “Any person who contravenes a condition of stay in force in respect of him or her shall be guilty of an offence. Also, visitors are not allowed to take employment in Hong Kong, whether paid or unpaid, without the permission of the Director of Immigration. Offenders are liable to prosecution and upon conviction face a maximum fine of $50,000 and up to two years’ imprisonment. Aiders and abettors are also liable to prosecution and penalties.”
     
         The spokesman warned, “As stipulated in section 38AA of the Immigration Ordinance, an illegal immigrant, a person who is the subject of a removal order or a deportation order, an overstayer or a person who was refused permission to land is prohibited from taking any employment, whether paid or unpaid, or establishing or joining in any business. Offenders are liable upon conviction to a maximum fine of $50,000 and up to three years’ imprisonment. As stipulated in section 20(1)(a) of the Immigration Ordinance, the Chief Executive may make a deportation order against an immigrant, prohibiting the immigrant from being in Hong Kong at any time thereafter if the immigrant has been found guilty in Hong Kong of an offence punishable by imprisonment for not less than two years.”
     
         The spokesman reiterated that it is a serious offence to employ people who are not lawfully employable. Under the Immigration Ordinance, the maximum penalty for an employer employing a person who is not lawfully employable, i.e. an illegal immigrant, a person who is the subject of a removal order or a deportation order, an overstayer or a person who was refused permission to land, has been significantly increased from a fine of $350,000 and three years’ imprisonment to a fine of $500,000 and 10 years’ imprisonment to reflect the gravity of such offences. The director, manager, secretary, partner, etc, of the company concerned may also bear criminal liability. The High Court has laid down sentencing guidelines that the employer of an illegal worker should be given an immediate custodial sentence.
     
         According to the court sentencing, employers must take all practicable steps to determine whether a person is lawfully employable prior to employment. Apart from inspecting a prospective employee’s identity card, the employer has the explicit duty to make enquiries regarding the person and ensure that the answers would not cast any reasonable doubt concerning the lawful employability of the person. The court will not accept failure to do so as a defence in proceedings. It is also an offence if an employer fails to inspect the job seeker’s valid travel document if the job seeker does not have a Hong Kong permanent identity card. Offenders are liable upon conviction to a maximum fine of $150,000 and to imprisonment for one year. In that connection, the spokesman reminded all employers not to defy the law by employing illegal workers. The ImmD will continue to take resolute enforcement action to combat such offences.
     
    Under the existing mechanism, the ImmD will, as a standard procedure, conduct an initial screening of vulnerable persons, including illegal workers, illegal immigrants, sex workers and foreign domestic helpers, who are arrested during any operation with a view to ascertaining whether they are trafficking in persons (TIP) victims. When any TIP indicator is revealed in the initial screening, the ImmD officers will conduct a full debriefing and identification by using a standardised checklist to ascertain the presence of TIP elements, such as threats and coercion in the recruitment phase and the nature of exploitation. Identified TIP victims will be provided with various forms of support and assistance, including urgent intervention, medical services, counselling, shelter or temporary accommodation and other supporting services. The ImmD calls on TIP victims to report crimes to the relevant departments immediately.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Draft Urban Renewal Authority Sai Yee Street/Flower Market Road Development Scheme Plan approved

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    The Chief Executive in Council has approved the draft Urban Renewal Authority (URA) Sai Yee Street/Flower Market Road Development Scheme Plan (DSP). 

    “The approved DSP provides a statutory land use planning framework to guide the implementation of the URA Sai Yee Street/Flower Market Road Development Scheme,” a spokesman for the Town Planning Board said today (April 17). 
     
    The development scheme area, covering about 29 315 square metres, is designated as “Other Specified Use” annotated “Mixed Use (1)” and “Other Specified Use” annotated “Mixed Use (2)”. By adopting the “linked-site” approach and the “Single Site, Multiple Use” model, the DSP intends to achieve a holistic replanning of land uses in the Sai Yee Street/Flower Market Road area through redevelopment of various existing Government, Institution or Community (G/IC) facilities with adjoining urban fabric for a comprehensive mixed-use development, with a combination of various types of compatible uses including residential, commercial (hotel/office/retail), G/IC, a sizeable public open space (i.e. Waterway Park), cultural, recreational and entertainment uses.
     
    The approved URA Sai Yee Street/Flower Market Road DSP No. S/K3/URA5/2 is available for public inspection during office hours at (i) the Secretariat of the Town Planning Board, (ii) the Planning Enquiry Counters, (iii) the Tsuen Wan and West Kowloon District Planning Office and (iv) the Yau Tsim Mong District Office. 
     
    Copies of the approved DSP are available for sale at the Map Publications Centre in North Point. The electronic version of the DSP can be viewed at the Town Planning Board’s website (www.tpb.gov.hk).

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Technology Development Board-Department of Science and Technology (TDB-DST) supports M/s dvipa Defence India Pvt. Ltd. in Strengthening India’s Small Arms Manufacturing Ecosystem”

    Source: Government of India

    Technology Development Board-Department of Science and Technology (TDB-DST) supports M/s dvipa Defence India Pvt. Ltd. in Strengthening India’s Small Arms Manufacturing Ecosystem”

    TDB-DST backs Homegrown Innovation: dvipa’s UGRAM Rifle Marks a New Era in Indian Small Arms Manufacturing”

    Posted On: 17 APR 2025 2:45PM by PIB Delhi

    The Ministry of Science and Technology, through the Technology Development Board (TDB), has taken a pivotal step toward indigenizing India’s small arms manufacturing capability by extending financial assistance to M/s dvipa Defence India Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad (erstwhile M/s dvipa Armour Pvt. Ltd.). The project, titled “Development and Commercialization of 7.62 mm x 51 mm Assault Rifles,” aims to produce high-performance, indigenous assault rifles in alignment with the Indian Army’s General Staff Qualitative Requirements (GSQR).

    TDB’s assistance will play a crucial role in enabling the development, testing, and commercialization of the UGRAM rifle, including the creation of a state-of-the-art in-house manufacturing unit with integrated quality assurance and testing infrastructure.

    For decades, India has depended heavily on imported small arms, resulting in substantial foreign exchange outflows and interoperability challenges across armed forces, thereby complicating training and logistics. The ageing INSAS rifles, once developed through earlier collaborations, are increasingly viewed as inadequate for modern combat needs. In 2017, the Government initiated a policy shift to replace these with advanced, reliable rifles chambered in 7.62 mm x 51 mm NATO-grade ammunition.

    In response to this national need, dvipa Defence, incorporated in October 2018, emerged as a strong domestic player in the defence manufacturing sector. As one of the early license holders for small arms and ammunition production, the company partnered with DRDO’s Armament Research & Development Establishment (ARDE), Pune, to develop a fully indigenous assault rifle, UGRAM – Sanskrit for “ferocious.” Demonstrating exceptional execution, five prototypes were developed within 100 days and successfully passed initial testing at ARDE.

    UGRAM: A Modern, Indigenous Combat-Ready Assault Rifle

    UGRAM is a modular, ergonomically designed 7.62 mm x 51 mm assault rifle, tailored for counter-insurgency (CI) and counter-terror (CT) operations by armed forces, paramilitary units, and special forces. It incorporates several advanced features:

    • Indigenous Development:
      • 100% design, material selection, manufacturing, and testing conducted domestically and approved by ARDE, DRDO.
    • Key Features:
      • Long-stroke piston mechanism for enhanced reliability.
      • High-strength steel used in all pressure-bearing parts.
      • High-grade nylon-based handguard, pistol grip, and buttstock.
      • Ambidextrous magazine release and ergonomic, side-mounted cocking handle.

    Speaking on the occasion, Sh. Rajesh Kumar Pathak, Secretary, TDB, said,
    “TDB’s support to dvipa Defence underscores our commitment to indigenizing critical defence technologies under ‘Make in India’ and ‘Atmanirbhar Bharat’. This project not only strengthens self-reliance but also paves the way for import substitution and future exports through trusted strategic partnerships.”

    Commenting on TDB’s support, Founders of M/s dvipa Defence India Pvt. Ltd. said,
    “We are proud to contribute to India’s strategic autonomy by building world-class defence products from Indian soil. The support from TDB strengthens our resolve to manufacture for the forces, by the forces, in India.”

    ********

    NKR/PSM

    (Release ID: 2122388) Visitor Counter : 28

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Hong Kong updates methodology for compiling greenhouse gas emission inventory and releases emission inventory for 2023

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    Hong Kong updates methodology for compiling greenhouse gas emission inventory and releases emission inventory for 2023 
    Since 2013, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government has been compiling its GHG emission inventory based on the Global Warming Potential (GWP) values provided in the Second Assessment Report (AR2) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). As decided by the UNFCCC at the 27th Conference of the Parties in 2022, GWP values set out in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) shall be used to calculate GHG emission inventory by no later than the end of 2024.
     
    In compliance with the requirement of the UNFCCC, the Government has used the AR5’s GWP values to compile the 2023 GHG emission inventory and update previous GHG emission figures to reflect annual variations and long-term trends.
     
    Based on the calculation using AR5’s GWP values, Hong Kong’s total GHG emissions in 2023 amounted to approximately 34.5 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e), representing a decrease of about 20 per cent compared to 2005 levels and a decrease of about 25 percent from the peak emissions in 2014. The per capita GHG emissions in 2023 reached a new low since 1990, at approximately 4.58 tonnes CO2-e. It is nearly 30 per cent lower than those in 2005 and 2014, and is about a quarter of that of the United States and 60 per cent of that of the European Union. The carbon intensity was about 0.012 kilograms of CO2-e per Hong Kong dollar of GDP, representing a decrease of about 46 per cent compared to 2005.
     
    The three main sources of GHG emissions in Hong Kong remain to be electricity generation (61 per cent), transport (18 per cent), and waste management (8 per cent). With the gradual replacement of coal with natural gas and zero-carbon energy for electricity generation, popularisation of electric vehicles, decrease in municipal solid waste quantity and increase in landfill gas recovery and utilisation (for energy production) in Hong Kong, GHG emissions from electricity generation, transport, and waste management have declined by approximately about 32 per cent, 7 per cent, and 10 per cent, respectively, compared to 2014.
     
    To align with the country’s “dual carbon” target to achieve the peak of carbon emissions before 2030 and carbon neutrality before 2060, the Government will continue to implement the four major decarbonisation strategies, namely, net-zero electricity generation, energy saving and green buildings, green transport and waste reduction, outlined in Hong Kong’s Climate Action Plan 2050, to reduce Hong Kong’s carbon emissions by half from the 2005 levels before 2035 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2050.
     
    Details of the 2023 GHG emission inventory can be found on the following website: cnsd.gov.hk/en/climate-ready/ghg-emissions-and-trendsIssued at HKT 12:00

    NNNN

    CategoriesMIL-OSI

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: MEDIA RELEASE: DHHL Awards Nearly 400 Project Leases in West Hawaiʻi

    Source: US State of Hawaii

    MEDIA RELEASE: DHHL Awards Nearly 400 Project Leases in West Hawaiʻi

    Posted on Apr 16, 2025 in Latest Department News, Newsroom

     

    STATE OF HAWAIʻI

    KA MOKU ʻĀINA O HAWAIʻI

     

    DEPARTMENT OF HAWAIIAN HOME LANDS

    KA ʻOIHANA ʻĀINA HOʻOPULAPULA HAWAIʻI

    JOSH GREEN, M.D.
    GOVERNOR

    KE KIAʻĀINA

     

    KALI WATSON

    DIRECTOR

    KA LUNA HOʻOKELE

     

    KATIE L. LAMBERT

    DEPUTY DIRECTOR

    KA HOPE LUNA HOʻOKELE

    DHHL AWARDS NEARLY 400 PROJECT LEASES IN WEST HAWAIʻI

    Event Adds to 790 Project Leases Awarded on Oʻahu Weeks Ago

     

    DHHL beneficiary Kanani Takata accepts first West Hawaiʻi project lease award alongside Lieutenant Governor Sylvia Luke and state and county leaders.

     

     

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    April 16, 2025

    SOUTH KOHALA, HAWAIʻI ISLAND – Volcanic haze rolled in on ka makani pahoa Saturday veiling a sunny South Kohala sky, but nothing could obscure the air of excitement felt in the Monarchy Ballroom as the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands prepared to present nearly 400 project lease awards in West Hawaiʻi: a feat that hadn’t been done since the early 2000s.

    More than 660 native Hawaiian beneficiaries and their ʻohana were invited to the Hilton Waikoloa Village April 12, 2025 for their opportunity to select between two homestead developments in West Hawaiʻi – Laʻi ʻŌpua in Kealakehe and Kailapa in Kawaihae.

    On that day, everyone heard their names called; starting with the first application submitted in 1963 to the most recent in December 2023.

    “Homesteads not only put our people back on the land; homesteads restore hope in our communities,” said Lieutenant Governor Sylvia Luke. “This administration will continue to invest in our Native Hawaiian community, and the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, to ensure our families have a home here in Hawaiʻi for generations to come.”

    The leases, 368 in Laʻi ʻŌpua and 22 in Kailapa, represent a significant step toward homeownership for many native Hawaiians waiting decades. This initiative is part of DHHL’s comprehensive approach to addressing its waitlist by expediting homesteading opportunities.

    “The success of our homesteading program relies on our ability to pivot towards the needs of our beneficiaries and project leases are one example of that,” said DHHL Director Kali Watson. “With developers in place and construction on the way, the department will deliver on some 1,200 units on Hawaiʻi Island in the next few years. Prince Jonah Kūhiō Kalanianaʻole established homesteads in response to what some called a landless and dying race. Today we issue project leases to bring his vision to fruition.”

    Unlike previous processes, beneficiaries secure a homestead lease prior to the completion of development. This approach gives families the chance to prepare for both financial and program requirements, thereby ensuring long-term stability and the opportunity to transfer their leases to eligible successors.

    Act 279, the department’s transformational $600 million allocation of general funds set forth in 2022 by the Hawaiʻi State Legislature funded Laʻi ʻŌpua’s $32.9 million infrastructure costs.

    ‘Forever Homes’ for Families

    The West Hawaiʻi project lease awards are the second of three major project lease distributions this year. DHHL awarded 790 leases in West Oʻahu in March and will award nearly a thousand on Maui at the end of the year. The department’s ambitious plan aims to issue more than 6,000 project leases statewide over the next two years.

    Accepting a lease on behalf of her grandpa, on the waitlist since 1963, Kanani Takata was first up.

    “I hear the cheers of the families that are celebrating a lease award and it is my prayer, my hope, that this would be able to bless generations now or future generations,” Takata said.

    West Hawaiʻi project lease awardee Charmaine Davis succeeded to her mother’s lease and intends on passing it to her own daughter. Davis’ mother became an applicant in the late-1970s.

    “Going forward, this is all about generations now,” said Davis. “We look forward to being able to provide and assist my grandchildren, and my great-grandchildren, in carrying on the legacy through Hawaiian homes. We have a forever home.”

    The department is currently in the process of developing five additional projects on Hawaiʻi Island. These projects include:

    • Honokaʻa: 296 units
    • Kaumana: 168 units
    • Palamanui: 132 units
    • Panaʻewa: 600 units
    • Laʻi ʻŌpua Village 4: 150 units

    “We can no longer bypass individuals on our waitlist – doing so disregards the decades-long wait our families patiently endured and tarnishes the legacy Prince Kūhiō dedicated his life to building,” Watson added. “Each new home represents an opportunity for generational change and will be built in ways that are accessible, high quality, and sustainable for our Native Hawaiian families.”

    Project leases provide a critical pathway to homeownership, offering options such as turnkey homes, owner-builder lots, and rent-to-own opportunities.

    For more information about DHHL’s lease awards and upcoming projects, visit dhhl.hawaii.gov.

    Click here to download visuals, soundbites.

    B-ROLL (2:09)

    SOUNDBITES

     

    Kanani Takata, West Hawaiʻi project lease awardee,

     

    (:32 seconds)

    “I knew that grandpa would be the number one pick, and I also knew that I would be the one standing in as his proxy so I hear the cheers of the families that are celebrating the awards, or a lease award, for these people who have been sitting on the list like my grandpa since 1963, so for me, my prayer, my hope is that this would be able to bless generations whether it be now or future generations to come.”

     

    Charmaine Davis, West Hawaiʻi project lease awardee

     

    (:17 seconds)

    “Going forward, this is all about generations now, we look forward to being able to provide and assist my grandchildren, and my great-grandchildren, in carrying on the legacy through Hawaiian homes, we have a forever home, a forever home.”

    Nathan Kapule, West Hawaiʻi project lease awardee,

     

    (:27 seconds)

    “I wasn’t really sure until they called me, and when I saw that I go wow, and being the front of the list is something special, so that’s what I felt, it’s a special opportunity for me, there’s a reason why things happen, I think there’s a reason why, and it is to support my family and being native Hawaiian.”

    # # #

     

    About the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands:

    The Department of Hawaiian Home Lands carries out Prince Jonah Kūhiō  Kalanianaʻole’s vision of rehabilitating native Hawaiians by returning them to the land. Established by U.S. Congress in 1921 with the passage of the Hawaiian Homes Commission Act, the Hawaiian homesteading program run by DHHL includes management of more than 200,000 acres of land statewide with the specific purpose of developing and delivering homesteading.

    Media Contact:

    Diamond Badajos

    Information and Community Relations Officer

    Department of Hawaiian Home Lands

    Cell: 808-342-0873

    Email: [email protected]

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. Announces First Quarter 2025 Results

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    First quarter 2025 net income of $47.0 million and net income available to common 
    stockholders of $42.7 million, or $0.92 per diluted share

    Strong balance sheet growth with total deposits increasing 9% and total loans growing 7% year-over-year

    Book Value and Tangible Book Value(1)per share both increasing 11% year-over-year, reaching record levels

    Capital ratios continue to be strong, including 11.6% CET1 and 15.6% Total Capital

    DALLAS, April 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ: TCBI), the parent company of Texas Capital Bank, announced operating results for the first quarter of 2025.

    “We continue to leverage our diversified product suite and financially resilient balance sheet to effectively support our clients’ objectives,” said Rob C. Holmes, Chairman, President & CEO. “With significant year-over-year improvements to many key financial and operating metrics, we remain focused on achieving published financial targets in the back-half of this year.”

      1st Quarter   4th Quarter   1st Quarter
    (dollars in thousands except per share data)   2025       2024       2024  
    OPERATING RESULTS          
    Net income $ 47,047     $ 71,023     $ 26,142  
    Net income available to common stockholders $ 42,734     $ 66,711     $ 21,829  
    Pre-provision net revenue(3) $ 77,458     $ 111,522     $ 53,935  
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.92     $ 1.43     $ 0.46  
    Diluted common shares   46,616,704       46,770,961       47,711,192  
    Return on average assets   0.61 %     0.88 %     0.36 %
    Return on average common equity   5.56 %     8.50 %     3.03 %
               
    OPERATING RESULTS, ADJUSTED(2)          
    Net income $ 47,047     $ 71,023     $ 33,898  
    Net income available to common stockholders $ 42,734     $ 66,711     $ 29,585  
    Pre-provision net revenue(3) $ 77,458     $ 111,522     $ 63,953  
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.92     $ 1.43     $ 0.62  
    Diluted common shares   46,616,704       46,770,961       47,711,192  
    Return on average assets   0.61 %     0.88 %     0.47 %
    Return on average common equity   5.56 %     8.50 %     4.11 %
               
    BALANCE SHEET          
    Loans held for investment $ 17,654,243     $ 17,234,492     $ 16,677,691  
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   4,725,541       5,215,574       4,153,313  
    Total loans held for investment   22,379,784       22,450,066       20,831,004  
    Loans held for sale   —       —       37,750  
    Total assets   31,375,749       30,731,883       29,180,585  
    Non-interest bearing deposits   7,874,780       7,485,428       8,478,215  
    Total deposits   26,053,034       25,238,599       23,954,037  
    Stockholders’ equity   3,429,774       3,367,936       3,170,662  
               

    (1) Stockholders’ equity excluding preferred stock, less goodwill and intangibles, divided by shares outstanding at period end.
    (2) These adjusted measures are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for the computations of these adjusted measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.
    (3) Net interest income plus non-interest income, less non-interest expense.

    FIRST QUARTER 2025 COMPARED TO FOURTH QUARTER 2024

    For the first quarter of 2025, net income available to common stockholders was $42.7 million, or $0.92 per diluted share, compared to $66.7 million, or $1.43 per diluted share, for the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Provision for credit losses for the first quarter of 2025 was $17.0 million, compared to $18.0 million for the fourth quarter of 2024. The $17.0 million provision for credit losses recorded in the first quarter of 2025 resulted primarily from an increase in criticized loans and $9.8 million in net charge-offs, as well as uncertainty in the economic outlook.

    Net interest income was $236.0 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to $229.6 million for the fourth quarter of 2024, as a decrease in funding costs was partially offset by a decrease in average earning assets. Net interest margin for the first quarter of 2025 was 3.19%, an increase of 26 basis points from the fourth quarter of 2024. LHI, excluding mortgage finance, yields increased 3 basis points from the fourth quarter of 2024 and LHI, mortgage finance, yields increased 20 basis points from the fourth quarter of 2024. Total cost of deposits was 2.76% for the first quarter of 2025, a 5 basis point decrease from the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Non-interest income for the first quarter of 2025 decreased $9.6 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2024 primarily due to a decrease in investment banking and advisory fees.

    Non-interest expense for the first quarter of 2025 increased $30.9 million, or 18%, compared to the fourth quarter of 2024, primarily due to an increase in salaries and benefits, primarily as a result of the effect of seasonal payroll expenses that peak in the first quarter.

    FIRST QUARTER 2025 COMPARED TO FIRST QUARTER 2024

    Net income available to common stockholders was $42.7 million, or $0.92 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2025, compared to $21.8 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, for the first quarter of 2024.

    The first quarter of 2025 included a $17.0 million provision for credit losses, reflecting an increase in criticized loans, $9.8 million in net charge-offs and uncertainty in the economic outlook, compared to a $19.0 million provision for credit losses for the first quarter of 2024.

    Net interest income increased to $236.0 million for the first quarter of 2025, compared to $215.0 million for the first quarter of 2024, primarily due to an increase in average total LHI and a decrease in funding costs, partially offset by an increase in average interest bearing liabilities and a decrease in earning asset yields. Net interest margin increased 16 basis points to 3.19% for the first quarter of 2025, as compared to the first quarter of 2024. LHI, excluding mortgage finance, yields decreased 41 basis points compared to the first quarter of 2024 and LHI, mortgage finance yields increased 33 basis points from the first quarter of 2024. Total cost of deposits decreased 21 basis points compared to the first quarter of 2024.

    Non-interest income for the first quarter of 2025 increased $3.1 million compared to the first quarter of 2024 primarily due to increases in service charges on deposit accounts, trading income and other non-interest income, partially offset by a decrease in investment banking and advisory fees.

    Non-interest expense for the first quarter of 2025 increased $627,000 compared to the first quarter of 2024, primarily due to increases in salaries and benefits and communications and technology expense, partially offset by a decrease in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) expense. The first quarter of 2024 included $3.0 million in additional FDIC special assessment expense.

    CREDIT QUALITY

    Net charge-offs of $9.8 million were recorded during the first quarter of 2025, compared to net charge-offs of $12.1 million and $10.8 million during the fourth quarter of 2024 and the first quarter of 2024, respectively. Criticized loans totaled $762.9 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $714.0 million at December 31, 2024 and $859.5 million at March 31, 2024. Non-accrual LHI totaled $93.6 million at March 31, 2025, compared to $111.2 million at December 31, 2024 and $92.8 million at March 31, 2024. The ratio of non-accrual LHI to total LHI for the first quarter of 2025 was 0.42%, compared to 0.50% for the fourth quarter of 2024 and 0.45% for the first quarter of 2024. The ratio of total allowance for credit losses to total LHI was 1.48% at March 31, 2025, compared to 1.45% and 1.46% at December 31, 2024 and March 31, 2024, respectively.

    REGULATORY RATIOS AND CAPITAL

    All regulatory ratios continue to be in excess of “well capitalized” requirements as of March 31, 2025. CET1, tier 1 capital, total capital and leverage ratios were 11.6%, 13.1%, 15.6% and 11.8%, respectively, at March 31, 2025, compared to 11.4%, 12.8%, 15.4% and 11.3%, respectively, at December 31, 2024 and 12.4%, 13.9%, 16.6% and 12.4%, respectively, at March 31, 2024. At March 31, 2025, our ratio of tangible common equity to total tangible assets was 10.0%, compared to 10.0% at December 31, 2024 and 9.8% at March 31, 2024.

    During the first quarter of 2025, the Company repurchased 396,106 shares of its common stock for an aggregate purchase price, including excise tax expense, of $31.2 million, at a weighted average price of $78.25 per share.

    About Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc.

    Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. (NASDAQ®: TCBI), a member of the Russell 2000®Index and the S&P MidCap 400®, is the parent company of Texas Capital Bank (“TCB”). Texas Capital is the collective brand name for TCB and its separate, non-bank affiliates and wholly-owned subsidiaries. Texas Capital is a full-service financial services firm that delivers customized solutions to businesses, entrepreneurs and individual customers. Founded in 1998, the institution is headquartered in Dallas with offices in Austin, Houston, San Antonio, and Fort Worth, and has built a network of clients across the country. With the ability to service clients through their entire lifecycles, Texas Capital has established commercial banking, consumer banking, investment banking and wealth management capabilities.

    Forward Looking Statements

    This communication contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of and pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 regarding, among other things, TCBI’s financial condition, results of operations, business plans and future performance. These statements are not historical in nature and may often be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “projects,” “expects,” “may,” “estimates,” “should,” “plans,” “targets,” “intends” “could,” “would,” “anticipates,” “potential,” “confident,” “optimistic” or the negative thereof, or other variations thereon, or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy, objectives, estimates, trends, guidance, expectations and future plans.

    Because forward-looking statements relate to future results and occurrences, they are subject to inherent and various uncertainties, risks, and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict, may change over time, are based on management’s expectations and assumptions at the time the statements are made and are not guarantees of future results. Numerous risks and other factors, many of which are beyond management’s control, could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. While there can be no assurance that any list of risks is complete, important risks and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: economic or business conditions in Texas, the United States or globally that impact TCBI or its customers; negative credit quality developments arising from the foregoing or other factors, including recent trade policies and their impact on our customers; TCBI’s ability to effectively manage its liquidity and maintain adequate regulatory capital to support its businesses; TCBI’s ability to pursue and execute upon growth plans, whether as a function of capital, liquidity or other limitations; TCBI’s ability to successfully execute its business strategy, including its strategic plan and developing and executing new lines of business and new products and services and potential strategic acquisitions; the extensive regulations to which TCBI is subject and its ability to comply with applicable governmental regulations, including legislative and regulatory changes; TCBI’s ability to effectively manage information technology systems, including third party vendors, cyber or data privacy incidents or other failures, disruptions or security breaches; TCBI’s ability to use technology to provide products and services to its customers; risks related to the development and use of artificial intelligence; changes in interest rates, including the impact of interest rates on TCBI’s securities portfolio and funding costs, as well as related balance sheet implications stemming from the fair value of our assets and liabilities; the effectiveness of TCBI’s risk management processes strategies and monitoring; fluctuations in commercial and residential real estate values, especially as they relate to the value of collateral supporting TCBI’s loans; the failure to identify, attract and retain key personnel and other employees; adverse developments in the banking industry and the potential impact of such developments on customer confidence, liquidity and regulatory responses to these developments, including in the context of regulatory examinations and related findings and actions; negative press and social media attention with respect to the banking industry or TCBI, in particular; claims, litigation or regulatory investigations and actions that TCBI may become subject to; severe weather, natural disasters, climate change, acts of war, terrorism, global conflict (including those already reported by the media, as well as others that may arise), or other external events, as well as related legislative and regulatory initiatives; and the risks and factors more fully described in TCBI’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and other documents and filings with the SEC. The information contained in this communication speaks only as of its date. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, we disclaim any obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of the forward-looking statements included herein to reflect future events or developments.

    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    SELECTED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (UNAUDITED)
    (dollars in thousands except per share data)
      1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter
        2025     2024    2024 
      2024     2024  
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME          
    Interest income $ 427,289   $ 437,571   $ 452,533   $ 422,068   $ 417,378  
    Interest expense   191,255     207,964     212,431     205,486     202,369  
    Net interest income   236,034     229,607     240,102     216,582     215,009  
    Provision for credit losses   17,000     18,000     10,000     20,000     19,000  
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   219,034     211,607     230,102     196,582     196,009  
    Non-interest income   44,444     54,074     (114,771 )   50,424     41,319  
    Non-interest expense   203,020     172,159     195,324     188,409     202,393  
    Income/(loss) before income taxes   60,458     93,522     (79,993 )   58,597     34,935  
    Income tax expense/(benefit)   13,411     22,499     (18,674 )   16,935     8,793  
    Net income/(loss)   47,047     71,023     (61,319 )   41,662     26,142  
    Preferred stock dividends   4,313     4,312     4,313     4,312     4,313  
    Net income/(loss) available to common stockholders $ 42,734   $ 66,711   $ (65,632 ) $ 37,350   $ 21,829  
    Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share $ 0.92   $ 1.43   $ (1.41 ) $ 0.80   $ 0.46  
    Diluted common shares   46,616,704     46,770,961     46,608,742     46,872,498     47,711,192  
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET DATA          
    Total assets $ 31,375,749   $ 30,731,883   $ 31,629,299   $ 29,854,994   $ 29,180,585  
    Loans held for investment   17,654,243     17,234,492     16,764,512     16,700,569     16,677,691  
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   4,725,541     5,215,574     5,529,659     5,078,161     4,153,313  
    Loans held for sale   —     —     9,022     36,785     37,750  
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   3,600,969     3,012,307     3,894,537     2,691,352     3,148,157  
    Investment securities   4,531,219     4,396,115     4,405,520     4,388,976     4,414,280  
    Non-interest bearing deposits   7,874,780     7,485,428     9,070,804     7,987,715     8,478,215  
    Total deposits   26,053,034     25,238,599     25,865,255     23,818,327     23,954,037  
    Short-term borrowings   750,000     885,000     1,035,000     1,675,000     750,000  
    Long-term debt   660,521     660,346     660,172     659,997     859,823  
    Stockholders’ equity   3,429,774     3,367,936     3,354,044     3,175,601     3,170,662  
               
    End of period shares outstanding   46,024,933     46,233,812     46,207,757     46,188,078     46,986,275  
    Book value per share $ 68.00   $ 66.36   $ 66.09   $ 62.26   $ 61.10  
    Tangible book value per share(1) $ 67.97   $ 66.32   $ 66.06   $ 62.23   $ 61.06  
    SELECTED FINANCIAL RATIOS          
    Net interest margin   3.19 %   2.93 %   3.16 %   3.01 %   3.03 %
    Return on average assets   0.61 %   0.88 %   (0.78 )%   0.56 %   0.36 %
    Return on average assets, adjusted(4)   0.61 %   0.88 %   1.00 %   0.57 %   0.47 %
    Return on average common equity   5.56 %   8.50 %   (8.87 )%   5.26 %   3.03 %
    Return on average common equity, adjusted(4)   5.56 %   8.50 %   10.04 %   5.31 %   4.11 %
    Efficiency ratio(2)   72.4 %   60.7 %   155.8 %   70.6 %   79.0 %
    Efficiency ratio, adjusted(2)(4)   72.4 %   60.7 %   62.3 %   70.4 %   75.1 %
    Non-interest income to average earning assets   0.60 %   0.69 %   (1.52 )%   0.71 %   0.59 %
    Non-interest income to average earning assets, adjusted(4)   0.60 %   0.69 %   0.86 %   0.71 %   0.59 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.59 %   2.65 %   2.89 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets, adjusted(4)   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.52 %   2.65 %   2.74 %
    Common equity to total assets   10.0 %   10.0 %   9.7 %   9.6 %   9.8 %
    Tangible common equity to total tangible assets(3)   10.0 %   10.0 %   9.7 %   9.6 %   9.8 %
    Common Equity Tier 1   11.6 %   11.4 %   11.2 %   11.6 %   12.4 %
    Tier 1 capital   13.1 %   12.8 %   12.6 %   13.1 %   13.9 %
    Total capital   15.6 %   15.4 %   15.2 %   15.7 %   16.6 %
    Leverage   11.8 %   11.3 %   11.4 %   12.2 %   12.4 %

    (1) Stockholders’ equity excluding preferred stock, less goodwill and intangibles, divided by shares outstanding at period end.
    (2) Non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income.
    (3) Stockholders’ equity excluding preferred stock, less goodwill and intangibles, divided by total assets, less goodwill and intangibles.
    (4) These adjusted measures are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to “GAAP to Non-GAAP Reconciliations” for the computations of these adjusted measures and the reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure.

     
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
    (dollars in thousands)
      March 31,
    2025
    December 31,
    2024
    September 30,
    2024
    June 30,
    2024
    March 31,
    2024
    Assets          
    Cash and due from banks $ 201,504   $ 176,501   $ 297,048   $ 221,727   $ 167,985  
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   3,600,969     3,012,307     3,894,537     2,691,352     3,148,157  
    Available-for-sale debt securities   3,678,378     3,524,686     3,518,662     3,483,231     3,491,510  
    Held-to-maturity debt securities   779,354     796,168     812,432     831,513     849,283  
    Equity securities   71,679     75,261     74,426     74,232     73,487  
    Trading securities   1,808     —     —     —     —  
    Investment securities   4,531,219     4,396,115     4,405,520     4,388,976     4,414,280  
    Loans held for sale   —     —     9,022     36,785     37,750  
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   4,725,541     5,215,574     5,529,659     5,078,161     4,153,313  
    Loans held for investment   17,654,243     17,234,492     16,764,512     16,700,569     16,677,691  
    Less: Allowance for credit losses on loans   278,379     271,709     273,143     267,297     263,962  
    Loans held for investment, net   22,101,405     22,178,357     22,021,028     21,511,433     20,567,042  
    Premises and equipment, net   84,575     85,443     81,577     69,464     49,899  
    Accrued interest receivable and other assets   854,581     881,664     919,071     933,761     793,976  
    Goodwill and intangibles, net   1,496     1,496     1,496     1,496     1,496  
    Total assets $ 31,375,749   $ 30,731,883   $ 31,629,299   $ 29,854,994   $ 29,180,585  
               
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity          
    Liabilities:          
    Non-interest bearing deposits $ 7,874,780   $ 7,485,428   $ 9,070,804   $ 7,987,715   $ 8,478,215  
    Interest bearing deposits   18,178,254     17,753,171     16,794,451     15,830,612     15,475,822  
    Total deposits   26,053,034     25,238,599     25,865,255     23,818,327     23,954,037  
    Accrued interest payable   25,270     23,680     18,679     23,841     32,352  
    Other liabilities   457,150     556,322     696,149     502,228     413,711  
    Short-term borrowings   750,000     885,000     1,035,000     1,675,000     750,000  
    Long-term debt   660,521     660,346     660,172     659,997     859,823  
    Total liabilities   27,945,975     27,363,947     28,275,255     26,679,393     26,009,923  
               
    Stockholders’ equity:          
    Preferred stock, $.01 par value, $1,000 liquidation value:          
    Authorized shares – 10,000,000          
    Issued shares(1)   300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000  
    Common stock, $.01 par value:          
    Authorized shares – 100,000,000          
    Issued shares(2)   517     515     515     515     514  
    Additional paid-in capital   1,060,028     1,056,719     1,054,614     1,050,114     1,044,669  
    Retained earnings   2,538,385     2,495,651     2,428,940     2,494,572     2,457,222  
    Treasury stock(3)   (332,994 )   (301,842 )   (301,868 )   (301,868 )   (251,857 )
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes   (136,162 )   (183,107 )   (128,157 )   (367,732 )   (379,886 )
    Total stockholders’ equity   3,429,774     3,367,936     3,354,044     3,175,601     3,170,662  
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 31,375,749   $ 30,731,883   $ 31,629,299   $ 29,854,994   $ 29,180,585  
               
    (1)Preferred stock – issued shares   300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000     300,000  
    (2)Common stock – issued shares   51,707,542     51,520,315     51,494,260     51,474,581     51,420,680  
    (3)Treasury stock – shares at cost   5,682,609     5,286,503     5,286,503     5,286,503     4,434,405  
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.    
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)    
    (dollars in thousands except per share data)    
      Three Months Ended March 31,
        2025   2024
    Interest income    
    Interest and fees on loans $ 334,150 $ 330,879
    Investment securities   46,565   32,144
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   46,574   54,355
    Total interest income   427,289   417,378
    Interest expense    
    Deposits   174,936   175,600
    Short-term borrowings   8,246   12,783
    Long-term debt   8,073   13,986
    Total interest expense   191,255   202,369
    Net interest income   236,034   215,009
    Provision for credit losses   17,000   19,000
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   219,034   196,009
    Non-interest income    
    Service charges on deposit accounts   7,840   6,339
    Wealth management and trust fee income   3,964   3,567
    Brokered loan fees   1,949   1,911
    Investment banking and advisory fees   16,478   18,424
    Trading income   5,939   4,712
    Other   8,274   6,366
    Total non-interest income   44,444   41,319
    Non-interest expense    
    Salaries and benefits   131,641   128,727
    Occupancy expense   10,844   9,737
    Marketing   5,009   6,036
    Legal and professional   14,989   16,195
    Communications and technology   23,642   21,114
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessment   5,341   8,421
    Other   11,554   12,163
    Total non-interest expense   203,020   202,393
    Income before income taxes   60,458   34,935
    Income tax expense   13,411   8,793
    Net income   47,047   26,142
    Preferred stock dividends   4,313   4,313
    Net income available to common stockholders $ 42,734 $ 21,829
         
    Basic earnings per common share $ 0.93 $ 0.46
    Diluted earnings per common share $ 0.92 $ 0.46
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    SUMMARY OF CREDIT LOSS EXPERIENCE
    (dollars in thousands)
      1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter
        2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    Allowance for credit losses on loans:          
    Beginning balance $ 271,709   $ 273,143   $ 267,297   $ 263,962   $ 249,973  
    Allowance established for acquired purchase credit deterioration loans   —     —     2,579     —     —  
    Loans charged-off:          
    Commercial   10,197     14,100     6,120     9,997     7,544  
    Commercial real estate   500     2,566     262     2,111     3,325  
    Consumer   —     —     30     —     —  
    Total charge-offs   10,697     16,666     6,412     12,108     10,869  
    Recoveries:          
    Commercial   483     4,562     329     153     105  
    Commercial real estate   413     18     —     —     —  
    Consumer   4     15     —     —     —  
    Total recoveries   900     4,595     329     153     105  
    Net charge-offs   9,797     12,071     6,083     11,955     10,764  
    Provision for credit losses on loans   16,467     10,637     9,350     15,290     24,753  
    Ending balance $ 278,379   $ 271,709   $ 273,143   $ 267,297   $ 263,962  
               
    Allowance for off-balance sheet credit losses:          
    Beginning balance $ 53,332   $ 45,969   $ 45,319   $ 40,609   $ 46,362  
    Provision for off-balance sheet credit losses   533     7,363     650     4,710     (5,753 )
    Ending balance $ 53,865   $ 53,332   $ 45,969   $ 45,319   $ 40,609  
               
    Total allowance for credit losses $ 332,244   $ 325,041   $ 319,112   $ 312,616   $ 304,571  
    Total provision for credit losses $ 17,000   $ 18,000   $ 10,000   $ 20,000   $ 19,000  
               
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to total loans held for investment   1.24 %   1.21 %   1.23 %   1.23 %   1.27 %
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to average total loans held for investment   1.29 %   1.22 %   1.24 %   1.27 %   1.32 %
    Net charge-offs to average total loans held for investment(1)   0.18 %   0.22 %   0.11 %   0.23 %   0.22 %
    Net charge-offs to average total loans held for investment for last 12 months(1)   0.18 %   0.19 %   0.20 %   0.22 %   0.20 %
    Total provision for credit losses to average total loans held for investment(1)   0.32 %   0.32 %   0.18 %   0.38 %   0.38 %
    Total allowance for credit losses to total loans held for investment   1.48 %   1.45 %   1.43 %   1.44 %   1.46 %

    (1) Interim period ratios are annualized.

               
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.          
    NON-PERFORMING ASSETS, PAST DUE LOANS AND CRITICIZED LOANS      
    (dollars in thousands)          
      1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter
        2025     2024     2024     2024     2024  
    NON-PERFORMING ASSETS          
    Non-accrual loans held for investment $ 93,565   $ 111,165   $ 88,960   $ 85,021   $ 92,849  
    Non-accrual loans held for sale(1)   —     —     —     —     9,250  
    Other real estate owned   —     —     —     —     —  
    Total non-performing assets $ 93,565   $ 111,165   $ 88,960   $ 85,021   $ 102,099  
               
    Non-accrual loans held for investment to total loans held for investment   0.42 %   0.50 %   0.40 %   0.39 %   0.45 %
    Total non-performing assets to total assets   0.30 %   0.36 %   0.28 %   0.28 %   0.35 %
    Allowance for credit losses on loans to non-accrual loans held for investment 3.0x 2.4x 3.1x 3.1x 2.8x
    Total allowance for credit losses to non-accrual loans held for investment 3.6x 2.9x 3.6x 3.7x 3.3x
               
    LOANS PAST DUE          
    Loans held for investment past due 90 days and still accruing $ 791   $ 4,265   $ 5,281   $ 286   $ 3,674  
    Loans held for investment past due 90 days to total loans held for investment   — %   0.02 %   0.02 %   — %   0.02 %
    Loans held for sale past due 90 days and still accruing $ —   $ —   $ —   $ 64   $ 147  
               
    CRITICIZED LOANS          
    Criticized loans $ 762,887   $ 713,951   $ 897,727   $ 859,671   $ 859,539  
    Criticized loans to total loans held for investment   3.41 %   3.18 %   4.03 %   3.95 %   4.13 %
    Special mention loans $ 484,165   $ 435,626   $ 579,802   $ 593,305   $ 584,528  
    Special mention loans to total loans held for investment   2.16 %   1.94 %   2.60 %   2.72 %   2.81 %

    (1) First quarter 2024 includes one non-accrual loan previously reported in loans held for investment that was transferred at fair value to held for sale as of March 31, 2024.

     
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
    (dollars in thousands)
               
      1st Quarter 4th Quarter 3rd Quarter 2nd Quarter 1st Quarter
        2025   2024   2024     2024   2024
    Interest income          
    Interest and fees on loans $ 334,150 $ 340,388 $ 361,407   $ 345,251 $ 330,879
    Investment securities   46,565   44,102   38,389     33,584   32,144
    Interest bearing deposits in other banks   46,574   53,081   52,737     43,233   54,355
    Total interest income   427,289   437,571   452,533     422,068   417,378
    Interest expense          
    Deposits   174,936   189,061   190,255     181,280   175,600
    Short-term borrowings   8,246   10,678   13,784     12,749   12,783
    Long-term debt   8,073   8,225   8,392     11,457   13,986
    Total interest expense   191,255   207,964   212,431     205,486   202,369
    Net interest income   236,034   229,607   240,102     216,582   215,009
    Provision for credit losses   17,000   18,000   10,000     20,000   19,000
    Net interest income after provision for credit losses   219,034   211,607   230,102     196,582   196,009
    Non-interest income          
    Service charges on deposit accounts   7,840   6,989   6,307     5,911   6,339
    Wealth management and trust fee income   3,964   4,009   4,040     3,699   3,567
    Brokered loan fees   1,949   2,519   2,400     2,131   1,911
    Investment banking and advisory fees   16,478   26,740   34,753     25,048   18,424
    Trading income   5,939   5,487   5,786     5,650   4,712
    Available-for-sale debt securities losses, net   —   —   (179,581 )   —   —
    Other   8,274   8,330   11,524     7,985   6,366
    Total non-interest income   44,444   54,074   (114,771 )   50,424   41,319
    Non-interest expense          
    Salaries and benefits   131,641   97,873   121,138     118,840   128,727
    Occupancy expense   10,844   11,926   12,937     10,666   9,737
    Marketing   5,009   4,454   5,863     5,996   6,036
    Legal and professional   14,989   15,180   11,135     11,273   16,195
    Communications and technology   23,642   24,007   25,951     22,013   21,114
    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance assessment   5,341   4,454   4,906     5,570   8,421
    Other   11,554   14,265   13,394     14,051   12,163
    Total non-interest expense   203,020   172,159   195,324     188,409   202,393
    Income/(loss) before income taxes   60,458   93,522   (79,993 )   58,597   34,935
    Income tax expense/(benefit)   13,411   22,499   (18,674 )   16,935   8,793
    Net income/(loss)   47,047   71,023   (61,319 )   41,662   26,142
    Preferred stock dividends   4,313   4,312   4,313     4,312   4,313
    Net income/(loss) available to common shareholders $ 42,734 $ 66,711 $ (65,632 ) $ 37,350 $ 21,829
    TEXAS CAPITAL BANCSHARES, INC.
    TAXABLE EQUIVALENT NET INTEREST INCOME ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED)(1)
    (dollars in thousands)
      1st Quarter 2025   4th Quarter 2024   1st Quarter 2024
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
      Average
    Balance
    Income/
    Expense
    Yield/
    Rate
    Assets                      
    Investment securities(2) $ 4,463,876 $ 46,565 4.10 %   $ 4,504,101 $ 44,102 3.79 %   $ 4,299,368 $ 32,144 2.77 %
    Interest bearing cash and cash equivalents   4,255,796   46,574 4.44 %     4,472,772   53,081 4.72 %     4,051,627   54,355 5.40 %
    Loans held for sale   335   2 2.97 %     —   — — %     51,164   1,184 9.31 %
    Loans held for investment, mortgage finance   3,972,106   38,527 3.93 %     5,409,980   50,685 3.73 %     3,517,707   31,455 3.60 %
    Loans held for investment(3)   17,527,070   296,091 6.85 %     16,919,925   289,916 6.82 %     16,522,089   298,306 7.26 %
    Less: Allowance for credit losses on loans   272,758   — — %     272,975   — —       249,936   — — %
    Loans held for investment, net   21,226,418   334,618 6.39 %     22,056,930   340,601 6.14 %     19,789,860   329,761 6.70 %
    Total earning assets   29,946,425   427,759 5.76 %     31,033,803   437,784 5.59 %     28,192,019   417,444 5.88 %
    Cash and other assets   1,157,184         1,178,284         1,058,463    
    Total assets $ 31,103,609       $ 32,212,087       $ 29,250,482    
                           
    Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity                      
    Transaction deposits $ 2,163,250 $ 13,908 2.61 %   $ 2,141,739 $ 15,403 2.86 %   $ 2,006,493 $ 16,858 3.38 %
    Savings deposits   13,357,243   133,577 4.06 %     12,932,458   144,393 4.44 %     11,409,677   136,790 4.82 %
    Time deposits   2,329,384   27,451 4.78 %     2,331,009   29,265 4.99 %     1,719,325   21,952 5.14 %
    Total interest bearing deposits   17,849,877   174,936 3.97 %     17,405,206   189,061 4.32 %     15,135,495   175,600 4.67 %
    Short-term borrowings   751,500   8,246 4.45 %     883,326   10,678 4.81 %     912,088   12,783 5.64 %
    Long-term debt   660,445   8,073 4.96 %     660,270   8,225 4.96 %     859,509   13,986 6.54 %
    Total interest bearing liabilities   19,261,822   191,255 4.03 %     18,948,802   207,964 4.37 %     16,907,092   202,369 4.81 %
    Non-interest bearing deposits   7,875,244         9,319,711         8,637,775    
    Other liabilities   552,154         522,641         509,286    
    Stockholders’ equity   3,414,389         3,420,933         3,196,329    
    Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 31,103,609       $ 32,212,087       $ 29,250,482    
    Net interest income   $ 236,504       $ 229,820       $ 215,075  
    Net interest margin     3.19 %       2.93 %       3.03 %

    (1) Taxable equivalent rates used where applicable.
    (2) Yields on investment securities are calculated using available-for-sale securities at amortized cost.
    (3) Average balances include non-accrual loans.

    GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATIONS

    The following items are non-GAAP financial measures: adjusted non-interest income, adjusted non-interest expense, adjusted net income, adjusted net income available to common stockholders, adjusted pre-provision net revenue (“PPNR”), adjusted diluted earnings/(loss) per common share, adjusted return on average assets, adjusted return on average common equity, adjusted efficiency ratio, adjusted non-interest income to average earning assets and adjusted non-interest expense to average earning assets. These are not measures recognized under GAAP and therefore are considered non-GAAP financial measures. The table below provides a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measures.

    These non-GAAP financial measures are adjusted for certain items, listed below, that management believes are non-operating in nature and not representative of its actual operating performance. Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures provide meaningful additional information about Texas Capital Bancshares, Inc. to assist management and investors in evaluating operating results, financial strength, business performance and capital position. Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. As such, these non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analyses of operating results or capital position as reported under GAAP.

    Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures      
    (dollars in thousands except per share data) 1st Quarter
    2025
    4th Quarter
    2024
    3rd Quarter
    2024
    2nd Quarter
    2024
    1st Quarter
    2024
    Net interest income $ 236,034   $ 229,607   $ 240,102   $ 216,582   $ 215,009  
               
    Non-interest income   44,444     54,074     (114,771 )   50,424     41,319  
    Available-for-sale debt securities losses, net   —     —     179,581     —     —  
    Non-interest income, adjusted   44,444     54,074     64,810     50,424     41,319  
               
    Non-interest expense   203,020     172,159     195,324     188,409     202,393  
    FDIC special assessment   —     —     651     (462 )   (3,000 )
    Restructuring expenses   —     —     (5,923 )   —     (2,018 )
    Legal Settlement   —     —     —     —     (5,000 )
    Non-interest expense, adjusted   203,020     172,159     190,052     187,947     192,375  
               
    Provision for credit losses   17,000     18,000     10,000     20,000     19,000  
               
    Income tax expense/(benefit)   13,411     22,499     (18,674 )   16,935     8,793  
    Tax effect of adjustments   —     —     44,880     104     2,262  
    Income tax expense/(benefit), adjusted   13,411     22,499     26,206     17,039     11,055  
               
    Net income/(loss)(1) $ 47,047   $ 71,023   $ (61,319 ) $ 41,662   $ 26,142  
    Net income/(loss), adjusted(1) $ 47,047   $ 71,023   $ 78,654   $ 42,020   $ 33,898  
               
    Preferred stock dividends   4,313     4,312     4,313     4,312     4,313  
               
    Net income/(loss) to common stockholders(2) $ 42,734   $ 66,711   $ (65,632 ) $ 37,350   $ 21,829  
    Net income/(loss) to common stockholders, adjusted(2) $ 42,734   $ 66,711   $ 74,341   $ 37,708   $ 29,585  
               
    PPNR(3) $ 77,458   $ 111,522   $ (69,993 ) $ 78,597   $ 53,935  
    PPNR(3), adjusted $ 77,458   $ 111,522   $ 114,860   $ 79,059   $ 63,953  
               
    Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted   46,616,704     46,770,961     46,608,742     46,872,498     47,711,192  
    Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share $ 0.92   $ 1.43   $ (1.41 ) $ 0.80   $ 0.46  
    Diluted earnings/(loss) per common share, adjusted $ 0.92   $ 1.43   $ 1.59   $ 0.80   $ 0.62  
               
    Average total assets $ 31,103,609   $ 32,212,087   $ 31,215,173   $ 29,750,852   $ 29,250,482  
    Return on average assets   0.61 %   0.88 % (0.78 )%   0.56 %   0.36 %
    Return on average assets, adjusted   0.61 %   0.88 %   1.00 %   0.57 %   0.47 %
               
    Average common equity $ 3,114,389   $ 3,120,933   $ 2,945,238   $ 2,857,661   $ 2,896,329  
    Return on average common equity   5.56 %   8.50 % (8.87 )%   5.26 %   3.03 %
    Return on average common equity, adjusted   5.56 %   8.50 %   10.04 %   5.31 %   4.11 %
               
    Efficiency ratio(4)   72.4 %   60.7 %   155.8 %   70.6 %   79.0 %
    Efficiency ratio, adjusted(4)   72.4 %   60.7 %   62.3 %   70.4 %   75.1 %
               
    Average earning assets $ 29,946,425   $ 31,033,803   $ 29,975,318   $ 28,573,791   $ 28,192,019  
    Non-interest income to average earning assets   0.60 %   0.69 % (1.52 )%   0.71 %   0.59 %
    Non-interest income to average earning assets, adjusted   0.60 %   0.69 %   0.86 %   0.71 %   0.59 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.59 %   2.65 %   2.89 %
    Non-interest expense to average earning assets, adjusted   2.75 %   2.21 %   2.52 %   2.65 %   2.74 %

    (1) Net interest income plus non-interest income, less non-interest expense, provision for credit losses and income tax expense/(benefit). On an adjusted basis, net interest income plus non-interest income, adjusted, less non-interest expense, adjusted, provision for credit losses and income tax expense/(benefit), adjusted.
    (2) Net income/(loss), less preferred stock dividends. On an adjusted basis, net income/(loss), adjusted, less preferred stock dividends.
    (3) Net interest income plus non-interest income, less non-interest expense. On an adjusted basis, net interest income plus non-interest income, adjusted, less non-interest expense, adjusted.
    (4) Non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income. On an adjusted basis, non-interest expense, adjusted, divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income, adjusted.

    The MIL Network –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI: Ragnarok: Back to Glory Official Launching in Korea and Southeast Asia on April 17, 2025

    Source: GlobeNewswire (MIL-OSI)

    Seoul, South Korea, April 17, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — GRAVITY Co., Ltd. (NasdaqGM: GRVY) (“Gravity” or “Company”), a developer and publisher of online and mobile games, announced the official launch of Ragnarok: Back to Glory, in Korea and Southeast Asia on April 17, 2025.

    Ragnarok: Back to Glory is a 3D MMORGPG Mobile game that features a globally integrated marketplace, allowing users in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau, Korea and Southeast Asia to freely trade in-game items. The game received positive feedback from users during the CBT conducted in Korea and it garnered significant interest in Southeast Asia with over 2 million users signing up for pre-registration, demonstrating strong anticipation for its official launch in both regions. Ragnarok: Back to Glory is available for download on Google Play and Apple App Store and can also be downloaded through local app markets in Southeast Asia.

    Gravity stated, “We are delighted to officially launch Ragnarok: Back to Glory in Korea and Southeast Asia. We have prepared a variety of events and look forward to your continued interest and participation”.

    [Gravity Official Website]
    http://www.gravity.co.kr

    [Ragnarok: Back to Glory Official Website-Korea]

    https://roglory.gnjoy.com

    [Ragnarok: Back to Glory Official Website-Southeast Asia]

    https://gwww.gnjoy.hk/official_rog/index.html

    [Ragnarok: Back to Glory Google Play Download Page-Korea]
    https://roglory.go.link/2TCYL

    [Ragnarok: Back to Glory Google Play Download Page-Southeast Asia]
    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.ggv.rogsea.aos

    [Ragnarok: Back to Glory Apple App Store Download Page-Korea]

    https://roglory.go.link/3G225

    [Ragnarok: Back to Glory Apple App Store Download Page-Southeast Asia]

    https://apps.apple.com/th/app/ragnarok-back-to-glory/id6740516890

    [Ragnarok: Back to Glory Official Lounge]

    https://game.naver.com/lounge/Ragnarok_BacktoGlory/home

    About GRAVITY Co., Ltd. —————————————————

    Gravity is a developer and publisher of online and mobile games. Gravity’s principal product, Ragnarok Online, is a popular online game in many markets, including Japan and Taiwan, and is currently commercially offered in 91 regions. For more information about Gravity, please visit http://www.gravity.co.kr.

    Contact:

    Mr. Heung Gon Kim
    Chief Financial Officer
    Gravity Co., Ltd.
    Email: kheung@gravity.co.kr

    Ms. Jin Lee
    Ms. Yujin Oh
    IR Unit
    Gravity Co., Ltd.
    Email: ir@gravity.co.kr
    Telephone: +82-2-2132-7801

    The MIL Network –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Global: Birkin vs Wirkin: the backlash against the global elite and their luxury bags – podcast

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Gemma Ware, Host, The Conversation Weekly Podcast, The Conversation

    Tony Neil Thompson/Shutterstock

    The Birkin bag made by French luxury retailer Hermès has become a status symbol for the global elite. Notoriously difficult to obtain, the world’s rich obsess over how to get their hands on one.

    But when US retailer Walmart recently launched a much cheaper bag that looked very similar to the Birkin, nicknamed a “Wirkin” by others, it sparked discussions about wealth disparity and the ethics of conspicuous consumption.

    In this episode of The Conversation Weekly podcast, we speak to two sociologists about the Birkin and what it symbolises.

    For the rich housewives of Delhi, the Birkin bag is a must have, says Parul Bhandari. A sociologist at the University of Cambridge in the UK, she’s spent time interviewing wealthy Indian women about their lives and preoccupations. She told us:

     A bag that is carried by rich women of New York, of London, of Paris, is something that you desire as well, so it’s a ticket of entry into the global elite.

    Birkins are also used by some of these rich women as a way to show off their husband’s affection, Bhandari says: “ Not only from the point of view of money, because obviously this bag is extremely expensive, but also because it is difficult to procure.” The harder your husband tries to help you get the bag, the more getting one is a testimony of conjugal love.

    Manufactured scarcity

    Named after the British actress Jane Birkin, Hermès’s signature bag can cost tens of thousands of dollars, or more on the resale market for those made in rare colours or out of rare leathers. But you can’t just walk into any Hermès store to buy one, as Aarushi Bhandari, a sociologist at Davidson College in the US who studies the internet – and is no relation to Parul – explains.

    You need to have a record of spending tens of thousands of dollars even before you’re offered to buy one. But spending that money doesn’t automatically mean you get a bag. You have to develop a relationship with a sales associate at a particular Hermès store and the sales associate really gets to decide, if there’s availability, whether or not you get offered a bag.

    Bhandari became intrigued by online communities where people discuss the best strategies for obtaining an Hermès. So when US retailer Walmart launched a bag in late 2024 that looked very similar to a Birkin, and the internet went wild, Bhandari was fascinated.

    She began to see posts on TikTok discussing the bag. First it was fashion accounts talking it up, but then a backlash began, with some users criticising those who would spend thousands on a real Birkin and praising the “Wirkin” as a way to make an iconic design accessible to regular people. Bhandari sees this as an example of an accelerating form of anti-elitism taking hold within parts of online culture.

    In February, the chief executive of Hermès, Axel Dumas, admitted that he was “irritated” by the Walmart bag and that the company took counterfeiting “very seriously”.

    The Walmart bag quickly sold out and no more were put on sale. It has since entered into a partnership with a secondhand luxury resale platform called Rebag, meaning customers can buy real Birkins secondhand through Walmart’s online marketplace.

    The Conversation approached Hermès for comment on the Walmart bag, and to confirm how the company decides who is eligible to buy a Birkin. Hermès did not respond.

    Listen to the full episode of The Conversation Weekly podcast to hear our conversation with Parul Bhandari and Aarushi Bhandari, plus an introduction from Nick Lehr, arts and culture editor at The Conversation in the US.


    This episode of The Conversation Weekly was written and produced by Katie Flood. Mixing and sound design by Eloise Stevens and theme music by Neeta Sarl.

    TikTok clips in this episode from babydoll2184, chronicallychaotic and pamelawurstvetrini.

    Listen to The Conversation Weekly via any of the apps listed above, download it directly via our RSS feed or find out how else to listen here.

    Parul Bhandari and Aarushi Bhandari do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Birkin vs Wirkin: the backlash against the global elite and their luxury bags – podcast – https://theconversation.com/birkin-vs-wirkin-the-backlash-against-the-global-elite-and-their-luxury-bags-podcast-254723

    MIL OSI – Global Reports –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Video: Meet the North Anna Power Station

    Source: United States of America – Federal Government Departments (video statements)

    The North Anna Power Station is located on Lake Anna in central Virginia. The state’s two nuclear reactors generate enough reliable electricity to power more than 450,000 homes.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaWwpHCNIrE

    MIL OSI Video –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: MOEA and Display Industry Join Forces to Showcase 27 Innovative Technologies

    Source: Republic of China Taiwan

    At the 2025 Touch Taiwan exhibition,the Department of Industrial Technology (DoIT),Ministry of Economic Affairs(MOEA), organized the Innovative Technology Pavilion, collaborating with leading companies including AUO, Innolux,Darwin, SynPower, LegendLaser, and Everlight. The pavilion presented 27 R&D outcomes across four major themes: panel-level packaging, automotive displays and smart applications, advanced display materials, and low-carbon and green manufacturing.

    In response to the growing demand for advanced chiplet and AI chip packaging, the exhibition features the world’s first Total Solution for High Aspect Ratio Panel-Level Packaging. This breakthrough overcomes traditional fabrication limitations by increasing the aspect ratio of 12-inch vias from 10 to 15, boosting interconnect density by over 50%. By adopting a fully wet deposition process, it reduces costs by half compared to traditional dry coating methods. This innovation is poised for application in high-speed, high-frequency communication and computing chips, further enhancing Taiwan’s competitiveness in the global packaging industry.

    DoIT Director General Chao-Chung Kuo noted that recent global tariff challenges have posed significant pressure on industries, highlighting the importance of resilient supply chains and robust innovation ecosystems. “Taiwan must build technology that can stand firm and expand globally,” said Kuo. Over the past four years, more than 120 innovative display technologies have been developed through technology development programs, driving over NT$13 billion in private investment and demonstrating the tangible impact of tech-driven economic growth.

    Kuo stressed that industrial upgrading does not rely on a single technology but on the strength of the entire ecosystem. To this end, the MOEA aims to use Touch Taiwan 2025 as a platform to deepen partnerships with local and international companies. The event features 11 technical forums and one-on-one matchmaking sessions with nearly 80 enterprises home and abroad. These efforts aim to transform R&D into practical applications, catalyzing Taiwan’s transition in the smart display sector and illuminating its global influence.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI USA: Congresswoman Ramirez Demands Committee on Homeland Security Oversight Visit to CECOT

    Source: United States House of Representatives – Representative Delia Ramirez – Illinois (3rd District)

    Washington, DC — Today, Congresswoman Delia C. Ramirez (IL-03) released the following statement after sending a letter to the Committee on Homeland Security demanding an oversight visit to the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) in Tecoluca, El Salvador: 

    “Congress’ role is oversight. And when the Executive Branch decides to use a notorious, off-shore prison with a history of gross human rights violations as their staging location for mass deportations without due process and in violation of international law, Congress must act. That is why, today I requested that the Committee on Homeland Security conduct an official oversight visit to CECOT. 

    President Trump and Secretary Noem deported Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia, Andry Hernandez Romero, Jerce Reyes Barrios and hundreds of others to CECOT with no due process, resulting in “administrative errors.” Their actions are illegal, unconstitutional and inhumane. In the case of Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia we already know that the Supreme Court unanimously agrees that Trump and Noem must be held accountable and bring Kilmar home! If it takes Trump flying Air Force One to El Salvdaor to pick him up, so be it. 

    In the meantime, not one more US dollar should go to El Salvador to imprison people in their notorious hall of human rights abuses, no further deportation flights should be arranged, and the threats of locking up “homegrown” criminals must STOP. 

    Congress must be a check on the out-of-control, lawless Trump Administration. A Congressional delegation needs to urgently go to CECOT to check on the health and well-being of all political prisoners that have been sent to this heinous place, and Kristi Noem must resign.”

    MIL OSI USA News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Ribbon cutting marks completion of Elmbrook School refurbishment

    Source: City of Leicester

    WORK is now complete on a £5.5million refurbishment project at Elmbrook School in Leicester.

    City Mayor Peter Soulsby and assistant city mayor for education, Cllr Elaine Pantling, joined headteacher Nicola Anderson at the site on Nether Hall Road last week for the official opening of the refurbished school.

    Since contractors moved onto site in May 2023, the old building that formerly housed the Nether Hall special school has been fully refurbished, creating a new home for pupils previously based at the Phoenix Centre pupil referral unit at Thurnby Lodge.

    Internal remodelling has created modern classrooms and new food tech and laboratory space, while outside the multi-use games area has been improved, roofs have been replaced and new perimeter fencing installed.

    The eco-friendly building now incorporates a range of energy efficiency measures, including increased levels of insulation, electric heating, passive ventilation, low energy LED lighting, and low water usage toilets and taps.

    Students were able to move into the newly renamed Elmbrook School in September 2024 – but the City Mayor’s visit last week was an opportunity for a formal opening ceremony.

    “The completion of this scheme demonstrates our commitment to providing modern, fit-for-purpose facilities that will help all our children get the most out of school and achieve their full potential,” said City Mayor Peter Soulsby.

    “I’m very pleased that this refurbished building now provides the optimal surroundings for Elmbrook’s pupils to feel safe and supported while they learn.”

    Head teacher Nicola Anderson said: “We are absolutely delighted to have finally moved into our new school.

    “The children attending Elmbrook School have not always had positive experiences of education, and we are so pleased that our fabulous new facilities show how much we value them. We spent many hours with Stepnells, and the property team, fine-tuning the design to ensure we have a school we can all be proud of, and that enriches the educational experience our pupils receive now and into the future.”

    Assistant city mayor Cllr Elaine Pantling, who leads on education, added: “Elmbrook School fulfils a key role in supporting young people to return to mainstream education, so I’m really pleased that we have been able to invest in this programme of improvements and create a modern learning environment that will give these children the second chance they deserve.”

    Elmbrook School’s refurbishment was funded through Leicester City Council’s capital programme and delivered by contractors Stepnell.

    The school provides short or long-term placements for children aged 5-11 who have been permanently excluded or are at risk of exclusion from mainstream education.

    Focused intervention and intensive support provided by staff at the school offers children a chance to flourish in a nurturing, learning environment, where they gain strategies that prepare them for a successful return to their old school or a transition to a new school placement.

    ends

    Picture caption: City mayor Peter Soulsby and assistant city mayor Cllr Elaine Pantling (second left) join headteacher Nicola Anderson (left) and co-headteacher Zaheera Omar-Davies to open the refurbished school building on Nether Hall Road.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: The investor has restored the premises in a historic building on Bolshaya Nikitskaya Street

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    The new owner has put in order a non-residential premises with an area of almost 44 square meters, located in a cultural heritage site of regional significance on Bolshaya Nikitskaya Street (building 22/2). This was reported by the Minister of the Moscow Government, head of the capital’s Department of City Property Maxim Gaman.

    “The investor purchased a 43.7 square meter space in a historic building (at 22/2 Bolshaya Nikitskaya Street) from the city at a competition, recognized as a cultural heritage site of regional significance. In 1905, the editorial office of the Bolshevik newspaper Vpered was located here. The space restored by the entrepreneur is the third one that was purchased from the capital in this building at a competition. In total, more than 270 square meters of space in the building have been put in order thanks to the new owners,” said Maxim Gaman.

    The building on Bolshaya Nikitskaya Street was built in 1902–1904 by Major General Vladimir Semenkovich according to the design of architect Karl Treiman as a tenement house. The ground floor housed shops, the second floor housed offices, and the upper floors housed inexpensive housing. During the year of the first Russian revolution, the building housed the editorial office of the Bolshevik newspaper Vperyod, where articles by Vladimir Lenin, Anatoly Lunacharsky, and Vaclav Vorovsky were published. After 1917, it housed communal apartments, and the lower floors were used for trade.

    Currently, it is a residential apartment building, although part of the space, as before, is used for commercial purposes. For example, there are several cafes, shops, a beauty salon. The building is located in the city center with developed infrastructure, from here you can walk to the Okhotny Ryad metro station, so the house has high investment potential.

    According to investor Dmitry Kletsky, in accordance with the terms of the agreement, a project was first prepared to adapt the premises for modern use, and then work was carried out in agreement with the capital’s Department of Cultural Heritage: redevelopment, replacement of flooring, waterproofing, equipping a kitchenette, equipping it with plumbing and an electric stove.

    The entrepreneur may use the premises at his own discretion, but on condition that the chosen type of activity does not pose a threat to the historical building. The investor is obliged to maintain the cultural heritage site in proper technical, sanitary and fire safety condition.

    Representatives of the capital Department of City Property And Department of Cultural Heritage are part of a specialized commission for monitoring compliance with the terms of competitions for the sale of cultural heritage sites. It evaluates how buyers fulfill their obligations. If they are not fulfilled properly, the city has the right to fine the violator or terminate the contract with him.

    The investor has restored the premises in a historic building on Kuznetsky Most StreetInvestors have restored 14 premises in historic buildings in Moscow since 2017

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please Note; This Information is Raw Content Directly from the Information Source. It is access to What the Source Is Stating and Does Not Reflect

    https: //vv.mos.ru/nevs/ite/152702073/

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: President Lai meets New Zealand delegation from All-Party Parliamentary Group on Taiwan  

    Source: Republic of China Taiwan

    Details
    2025-04-15
    President Lai meets delegation led by Tuvalu Deputy Prime Minister Panapasi Nelesone 
    On the afternoon of April 15, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation led by Tuvalu Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance and Economic Development Panapasi Nelesone and his wife. In remarks, President Lai thanked Tuvalu for its staunch and long-term backing of Taiwan’s international participation. The president said he looks forward to our nations deepening bilateral ties in such areas as agriculture, medicine, education, and information and communications technology and working together toward greater peace, prosperity, and development in the Pacific region. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: I extend a very warm welcome to Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone and Madame Corinna Ituaso Laafai as they lead this delegation to Taiwan. Our distinguished guests are the first delegation from Tuvalu that I have received at the Presidential Office this year. During my visit to Tuvalu last year, I met and exchanged views with Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone and the ministers present. I am delighted to meet you again today and thank you once again for the hospitality you accorded my delegation. The culture of Tuvalu and the warmth of its people are not easily forgotten. Tuvalu’s support for Taiwan has also touched us deeply. I want to take this opportunity to thank Tuvalu for staunchly backing Taiwan’s international participation over the past several decades. Our two countries have supported each other like family and have together made contributions in the international arena. Last Tuesday, I received the credentials of Ambassador Lily Tangisia Faavae and expressed my hope for Taiwan and Tuvalu continuing to deepen bilateral relations. This visit by Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone is an important step in that regard. Our two countries will be signing a labor cooperation agreement and an agreement concerning the recognition of training and certification of seafarers. This will expand bilateral cooperation at multiple levels and bring our relations even closer. Taiwan and Tuvalu are maritime nations and share the values of democracy and freedom. Our two countries have stood shoulder to shoulder to protect marine resources and address the challenges posed by climate change and authoritarianism, and we aspire to work toward greater peace, prosperity, and development in the Pacific region. Our nations have produced fruitful results in such areas as agriculture, medicine, education, and information and communications technology. I anticipate that, with the support of Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone and our distinguished guests, we can continue to employ a more diverse range of strategies to begin a new chapter in our diplomatic partnership. Together, we can make even greater and more concrete contributions to regional development. Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone then delivered remarks, first thanking President Lai for his kind words of welcome and the warm hospitality extended to his delegation. On behalf of the government and people of Tuvalu, he conveyed their gratitude to the president and the people of Taiwan for the generous support, as well as for the enduring friendship we share. He said that Taiwan’s steadfast commitment to our bilateral relationship has been instrumental in advancing our shared values of democracy, resilience, and sustainable development. From vital development assistance to cooperation in health, education, and climate change resilience, he added, Taiwan’s contributions have made a significant impact on the lives of the people of Tuvalu.  For Taiwan’s recent generous donation of shoes for Tuvaluan primary school students, Deputy Prime Minister Nelesone expressed thanks to President Lai. He commented that these gifts, which underscore a deep commitment to the welfare of their youth, transcend mere material support; they are symbols of care, friendship, and hope for the future generations. Noting that our bilateral relationship is built on mutual respect, shared values, and a common vision for sustainable development in the Pacific, he expressed confidence that this partnership will continue to flourish and will serve as a beacon of cooperation and solidarity within our region.  The delegation also included Tuvalu Minister of Foreign Affairs, Labour, and Trade Paulson Panapa; Minister of Public Works, Infrastructure Development and Water Ampelosa Tehulu, and was accompanied to the Presidential Office by Tuvalu Ambassador Faavae.

    Details
    2025-04-10
    President Lai pens Bloomberg News article on Taiwan’s response to US reciprocal tariffs
    On April 10, an article penned by President Lai Ching-te entitled “Taiwan Has a Roadmap for Deeper US Trade Ties” was published by Bloomberg News, explaining to a global audience Taiwan’s strategy on trade with the United States, as well as how Taiwan will engage in dialogue with the aim of removing bilateral trade barriers, increasing investment between Taiwan and the US, and reducing tariffs to zero. The following is the full text of President Lai’s article: Last month, the first of Taiwan’s 66 new F-16Vs rolled off the assembly line in Greenville, South Carolina. Signed during President Donald Trump’s first term, the $8 billion deal stands as a testament to American ingenuity and leadership in advanced manufacturing. Beyond its economic impact – creating thousands of well-paying jobs across the US – it strengthens the foundations of peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific.  This deal is emblematic of the close interests shared between Taiwan and the US. Our bond is forged by an unwavering belief in freedom and liberty. For decades, our two countries have stood shoulder-to-shoulder in deterring communist expansionism. Even as Beijing intensifies its air force and naval exercises in our vicinity, we remain resolute. Taiwan will always be a bastion of democracy and peace in the region. This partnership extends well beyond the security realm. Though home to just 23 million people, Taiwan has in recent years become a significant investor in America. TSMC recently announced it will raise its total investment in the US to $165 billion – an initiative that will create 40,000 construction jobs and tens of thousands more in advanced chip manufacturing and R&D. This investment will bolster the emergence of a new high-tech cluster in Arizona. Taiwan is committed to strengthening bilateral cooperation in manufacturing and innovation. As a trade-dependent economy, our long-term success is built on trade relationships that are fair, reciprocal and mutually beneficial. Encouraging Taiwanese businesses to expand their global footprint, particularly in the US, is a vital part of this strategy. Deepening commercial ties between Taiwanese and American firms is another. These core principles will guide our response to President Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. First, we will seek to restart trade negotiations with a common objective of reducing all tariffs between Taiwan and the US. While Taiwan already maintains low tariffs, with an average nominal rate of 6%, we are willing to further cut this rate to zero on the basis of reciprocity with the US. By removing the last vestiges to free and fair trade, we seek to encourage greater trade and investment flows between our two countries. Second, Taiwan will rapidly expand procurement of American goods. Over the past five years, rising demand for semiconductors and AI-related components has increased our trade surplus. In response to these market trends, Taiwan will seek to narrow the trade imbalance through the procurement of energy, agriculture and other industrial goods from the US. These efforts will create thousands of new jobs across multiple sectors.  We’ll also pursue additional arms procurements that are vital to our self-defense and contribute to peace and stability over the Taiwan Strait. During President Trump’s first term, we secured $18 billion in arms deals, including advanced fighter jets, tanks and anti-ship missiles. Future purchases, which are not reflected in trade balances, build on our economic and security partnership while being essential to Taiwan’s “Peace Through Strength” approach. Third, new investments will be made across the US. Already, Taiwanese firms support 400,000 jobs throughout all 50 states. Beyond TSMC, we also see emerging opportunities in electronics, ICT, energy and petrochemicals. We will establish a cross-agency “US Investment Team” to support bilateral trade and investment – and we hope that efforts will be reciprocated by the Trump administration. Fourth, we are committed to removing non-tariff trade barriers. Taiwan will take concrete steps to resolve persistent issues that have long impeded trade negotiations. And finally, we will strongly address US concerns over export controls and improper transshipment of low-cost goods through Taiwan. These steps form the basis of a comprehensive roadmap for how Taiwan will navigate the shifting trade landscape, transforming challenges in the Taiwan-US economic relationship into new opportunities for growth, resilience and strategic alignment. At a time of growing global uncertainty, underpinned by growing Chinese assertiveness, closer trade ties are more than sound economics; they are a critical pillar of regional security. Our approach is long-term and principled, grounded in a lasting commitment to our friendship with the US, a firm belief in the benefits of fair and reciprocal trade, and an unwavering dedication to peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. We are confident that our shared economic and security interests will not only overcome turbulence in the international trade environment – they will define the future of a free and open Indo-Pacific.

    Details
    2025-04-08
    President Lai receives credentials from new Tuvalu Ambassador Lily Tangisia Faavae  
    On the morning of April 8, President Lai Ching-te received the credentials of new Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Tuvalu to the Republic of China (Taiwan) Lily Tangisia Faavae. In remarks, President Lai welcomed the ambassador to her new post and thanked Tuvalu for its long-term support for Taiwan’s international participation. The president also noted that joint efforts between our two countries have produced fruitful results in such areas as medicine and public health, agricultural and fisheries technology, and information and communications technology. He expressed his hope that we will continue to deepen our bilateral relations so as to generate even greater well-being for our peoples and promote peace, stability, and prosperity in the Pacific region. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: It is a great pleasure today to receive the credentials of Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Tuvalu Lily Tangisia Faavae. On behalf of the Republic of China (Taiwan), I extend my warmest welcome to you. Last year, the Republic of China (Taiwan) and Tuvalu celebrated 45 years of diplomatic relations. Prime Minister Feleti Teo visited Taiwan in May last year for the inauguration of myself and Vice President Bi-khim Hsiao and again in October for our National Day celebrations. When I visited Tuvalu last December, I was warmly received by the government and people of Tuvalu, and I deeply felt that our two countries were like family. Ambassador Faavae’s posting to Taiwan demonstrates the importance Prime Minister Teo places on our ties. Widely recognized for her exceptional talent, Ambassador Faavae is an outstanding official with extensive experience in public service. Moreover, during her term as Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, she voiced support for Taiwan at the World Health Assembly. I believe that with her assistance, our two nations will further advance cooperation and exchanges. I want to thank the government of Tuvalu for long supporting Taiwan’s international participation. Furthermore, joint efforts between our two countries have produced fruitful results in such areas as medicine and public health, agricultural and fisheries technology, and information and communications technology. Last year, Prime Minister Teo and I signed a joint communiqué on advancing the comprehensive partnership between Taiwan and Tuvalu. Going forward, we will stand together in tackling the challenges we face, including climate change and expanding authoritarianism. And we will continue to deepen our bilateral relations so as to generate even greater well-being for our peoples and promote peace, stability, and prosperity in the Pacific region. Once again, I warmly welcome Ambassador Faavae to her new post in Taiwan. Please convey warmest regards from Taiwan to Prime Minister Teo and all of our friends in Tuvalu. I wish you all the best in work and life during your term in Taiwan. Ambassador Faavae then delivered remarks, saying that it is a great honor and privilege to meet with President Lai today as the new Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Tuvalu to Taiwan, and to present to him her letter of credence. She then extended, on behalf of the government and people of Tuvalu, her warmest greetings and deep respect to the president and people of Taiwan. The letter of credence, she noted, signifies the trust and confidence that her government and governor-general have placed in her to represent their nation and to foster and strengthen the bonds of friendship and cooperation between our countries. Ambassador Faavae said that our two countries have enjoyed a longstanding relationship of 45 years based on mutual respect, cooperation, and shared values. She added that we have collaborated, and continue to do so, in such fields as education, health, climate change adaptation and sea level rise mitigation, agriculture, clean energy, and internet connectivity.  Ambassador Faavae pointed out that Tuvalu remains committed to deepening ties with Taiwan and that it values people-to-people connections and our shared Austronesian heritage. She noted that the people of Tuvalu, a small developing nation, have greatly benefited from Taiwan’s advanced technical expertise and diverse financial assistance. She said she believes Tuvalu and Taiwan share a common interest and are united in our efforts and commitment to upholding democracy, peace, stability, and prosperity for our people and making the world better and safer.  Ambassador Faavae stated that as ambassador of Tuvalu to Taiwan, she pledges to work diligently and respectfully to enhance our bilateral relations, promote mutual understanding, and facilitate collaboration in areas of shared concern. The ambassador said she looks forward to collaborating closely with the Taiwan government and other stakeholders to achieve our common objectives and to continue building a more prosperous and harmonious future for our nations. In closing, she thanked President Lai for the opportunity to serve and to further the enduring friendship between our two countries.  

    Details
    2025-03-28
    President Lai meets British Office Taipei Representative Ruth Bradley-Jones
    On the afternoon of March 28, President Lai Ching-te met with British Office Taipei Representative Ruth Bradley-Jones. In remarks, President Lai welcomed Representative Bradley-Jones as she takes up her post in Taiwan, and thanked the United Kingdom government and parliament for demonstrating staunch support for Taiwan. The president indicated that Taiwan and the UK enjoy close economic and trade ties, and our industries complement each other well, with great potential for collaboration in such fields as semiconductors, AI, unmanned vehicles, and medium- and low-orbit satellites. He stated that he looks forward to expanding exchanges with the UK across all domains so as to enhance democratic and economic resilience, jointly advancing the prosperous development of the Indo-Pacific region and economic security around the world. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: It is a pleasure to meet Representative Bradley-Jones here at the Presidential Office for this exchange. I understand that she has proactively called at many government agencies since taking up her post last month. On behalf of the people of Taiwan, I extend a warm welcome. Taiwan and the UK are partners that share the values of freedom and democracy. In recent years, our bilateral relations have continued to deepen. With the efforts of Representative Bradley-Jones and our respective governments, I look forward to the expansion of dialogue and cooperation between Taiwan and the UK. This will further elevate our bilateral ties. Especially in the face of expanding authoritarianism, the UK is not only playing an important role in crafting a unified European response; it is also demonstrating staunch support for Taiwan through various channels. For example, joint statements released after the Australia-UK ministerial consultations, as well as the G7 foreign ministers’ meeting, underlined a high level of concern for peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait. The UK government has publicly expressed support for Taiwan’s international participation on multiple occasions. And last November, the UK House of Commons passed a motion clearly asserting that United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758 does not mention Taiwan. These actions attest to the UK’s belief in supporting democracy and peace, and have further solidified our countries’ friendship. I would like to convey my deepest gratitude to the UK government and parliament.  Currently, the UK is Taiwan’s fourth largest trading partner in Europe and second largest source of investment from Europe. We enjoy close economic and trade ties, and our industries complement each other well. There is also great potential for collaboration in such fields as semiconductors, AI, unmanned vehicles, and medium- and low-orbit satellites. We look forward to expanding exchanges with the UK across all domains so as to enhance democratic and economic resilience. We also hope the UK will continue to support Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership so that together, we can work with more like-minded partners, jointly advancing the prosperous development of the Indo-Pacific region and economic security around the world. Once again, I welcome Representative Bradley-Jones to Taiwan and wish her all the best with her work. I anticipate that Taiwan-UK relations will continue to steadily advance through our joint efforts. Representative Bradley-Jones then delivered remarks, first saying in Mandarin that she is honored to meet with President Lai to discuss topics of mutual concern and jointly deepen Taiwan-UK relations, promoting mutual understanding, respect, and cooperation. She went on to say that she came to Taiwan last August to study Mandarin, and began her post as British Office Taipei representative in February this year, noting that every day she learns more about and gains a deeper understanding of Taiwan. Last year, she said, she visited Tainan and Wanli, and found Tainan’s wetlands and the scenery in Wanli very impressive. She added that she has also tried many different Taiwanese foods, and is looking forward to experiencing even more of Taiwan’s local culture and customs over the next four years. Continuing her remarks in English, Representative Bradley-Jones stated that since taking up her post, she has borne witness to the strength of the relationship between Taiwan and the UK and the potential for it to continue to grow. She said that on trade and investment, there is significant complementarity between Taiwan’s Five Trusted Industry Sectors and the UK’s Industrial Strategy, particularly in areas such as digital technologies, advanced manufacturing, and clean energy. Both governments are also together supporting Taiwan and UK businesses through our Enhanced Trade Partnership and annual trade talks, she said. Representative Bradley-Jones went on to say that on science and technology, Taiwan and the UK can and should do more together. She noted that the UK has the third largest tech sector in the world and is valued at over US$1.1 trillion, while Taiwan is the center of the semiconductor and AI hardware world. Given our complementary strengths, especially in areas such as semiconductors, space, and communications technology, she said, the UK has stepped up its level of activity in Taiwan, including by regularly hosting a UK Pavilion at SEMICON and funding 18 joint R&D programs through our new collaborative R&D fund, and looks forward to doing more together in the future.  In support of Taiwan’s whole-of-society resilience, the representative said, the UK is supporting valuable exchanges, co-hosting GCTF (Global Cooperation and Training Framework) workshops, sharing lessons on financial sector resilience, and reaching out to mayors and community leaders across Taiwan. From financial resilience to cyber resilience, she said, the UK’s public sector and private industries have plenty to share and learn. Representative Bradley-Jones stated that on people-to-people links, parliamentarians, civil society, and academics are continuing to deepen contact, and that she is particularly excited by a new smart parliament partnership agreed upon by the Taiwan Foundation for Democracy and the UK’s Westminster Foundation for Democracy, which aims to facilitate cross-party, cross-society, and cross-border exchanges on issues such as democratic governance, AI, inclusive policy-making, and public safety. The representative indicated that the examples she mentioned just scratch the surface of the full potential of the Taiwan-UK relationship. She said that the UK’s longstanding policy remains unchanged, and fundamentally, that is because we share a common set of values and interests. We are together focused on how to make our societies safer and more prosperous tomorrow than they are today, she said, and as like-minded democracies, innovative economies, and practical partners, the sincere and pragmatic cooperation between Taiwan and the UK is bringing material benefits to the prosperity and well-being of our people every day. 

    Details
    2025-03-21
    President Lai meets Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy
    On the morning of March 21, President Lai Ching-te met with a delegation led by Alaska Governor Mike Dunleavy. In remarks, President Lai said that Alaska has long been an important trading partner of Taiwan, and that we have built a solid foundation for cooperation in such fields as energy, fisheries, and tourism. The president expressed hope that Taiwan and Alaska will have more frequent engagement and exchanges so that our relations can continue to grow to create prosperous development for both sides. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: On behalf of the people of Taiwan, I extend my sincerest welcome to our guests. This is Governor Dunleavy’s first visit to Taiwan, and last night, we both attended the Hsieh Nien Fan (謝年飯) banquet hosted by the American Chamber of Commerce in Taiwan. I am delighted to have this opportunity to meet with Governor Dunleavy today at the Presidential Office for further dialogue. Alaska has long been an important trading partner of Taiwan. Our sister-state relationship was established in 1988, and we have built a solid foundation for cooperation in such fields as energy, fisheries, and tourism. Currently, Taiwan is Alaska’s eighth largest export market and ninth largest source of imports. This goes to show just how close our trade and economic ties are and how much potential there is for further growth. As I said in my remarks at last night’s Hsieh Nien Fan banquet, Taiwan is interested in buying Alaskan natural gas. I am sure that Governor Dunleavy’s visit will help us explore even more opportunities for cooperation and continue to deepen Taiwan-United States relations. In the face of such challenges as expanding authoritarianism, climate change, and pandemics, we look forward to strengthening collaboration between Taiwan and the US. By drawing on our strengths, we can jointly build non-red supply chains to bolster our economic resilience and drive the advancement of global technology. I want to thank the US government for reiterating the importance it attaches to peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and its opposition to any attempt to change the status quo by force or coercion. These statements backing Taiwan help in maintaining stability across the Taiwan Strait and in the Indo-Pacific region. Once again, I thank Governor Dunleavy for traveling such a long way to Taiwan. We hope to see more frequent engagement and exchanges between Taiwan and Alaska so that our relations can continue to grow, and we can create prosperous development for both sides. Governor Dunleavy then delivered remarks, saying that their trip to visit friends in Taiwan has been fantastic, thanking President Lai for the invitation to meet, and thanking all the staff. Governor Dunleavy said that as the pandemic was raging, the world went from “before COVID” to “after COVID.” Before COVID, he said, the world relied on a number of systems that were in place for decades after World War II involving supply chains, alliances, sources of energy, trading partners, and friends. He went on to say that as we go beyond COVID, we are reestablishing and reevaluating who our friends are, where we are going to get our energy, and who our trading partners are going to be. The governor said that we are creating a new world for the next 50 years with the new administration in Washington, and this is an opportunity for us to reevaluate and reinvest with our friends for the next 50 years in each other, our futures, and our security. Governor Dunleavy stated that one thing is for certain: that Taiwan is a friend of the US and a friend of Alaska, and has been for many, many decades. He said that it is their hope in this trip and subsequent trips to establish an even tighter bond among their friends in Taiwan, the US, and Alaska. The governor also said that we have much in common in that we are members of the Pacific family, are democracies, and believe in freedom, free speech, and capitalism. He indicated that he has much optimism for the future, and that as we reestablish relationships throughout the world, energy is going to be the key and the basis for our economic development, our national security, and our friendship. Governor Dunleavy said that he believes this trip is going to lay the groundwork for a fantastic future between Taiwan, Alaska, and the US, and that with President Lai’s support as well as the support of the US administration, we can work together to build even better relationships.

    Details
    2025-04-06
    President Lai delivers remarks on US tariff policy response
    On April 6, President Lai Ching-te delivered recorded remarks regarding the impact of the 32 percent tariff that the United States government recently imposed on imports from Taiwan in the name of reciprocity. In his remarks, President Lai explained that the government will adopt five response strategies, including making every effort to improve reciprocal tariff rates through negotiations, adopting a support plan for affected domestic industries, adopting medium- and long-term economic development plans, forming new “Taiwan plus the US” arrangements, and launching industry listening tours. The president emphasized that as we face this latest challenge, the government and civil society will work hand in hand, and expressed hope that all parties, both ruling and opposition, will support the measures that the Executive Yuan will take to open up a broader path for Taiwan’s economy. A translation of President Lai’s remarks follows: My fellow citizens, good evening. The US government recently announced higher tariffs on countries around the world in the name of reciprocity, including imposing a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan. This is bound to have a major impact on our nation. Various countries have already responded, and some have even adopted retaliatory measures. Tremendous changes in the global economy are expected. Taiwan is an export-led economy, and in facing future challenges there will inevitably be difficulties, so we must proceed carefully to turn danger into safety. During this time, I want to express gratitude to all sectors of society for providing valuable opinions, which the government regards highly, and will use as a reference to make policy decisions.  However, if we calmly and carefully analyze Taiwan’s trade with the US, we find that last year Taiwan’s exports to the US were valued at US$111.4 billion, accounting for 23.4 percent of total export value, with the other 75-plus percent of products sold worldwide to countries other than the US. Of products sold to the US, competitive ICT products and electronic components accounted for 65.4 percent. This shows that Taiwan’s economy does still have considerable resilience. As long as our response strategies are appropriate, and the public and private sectors join forces, we can reduce impacts. Please do not panic. To address the reciprocal tariffs by the US, Taiwan has no plans to adopt retaliatory tariffs. There will be no change in corporate investment commitments to the US, as long as they are consistent with national interests. But we must ensure the US clearly understands Taiwan’s contributions to US economic development. More importantly, we must actively seek to understand changes in the global economic situation, strengthen Taiwan-US industry cooperation, elevate the status of Taiwan industries in global supply chains, and with safeguarding the continued development of Taiwan’s economy as our goal, adopt the following five strategies to respond. Strategy one: Make every effort to improve reciprocal tariff rates through negotiations using the following five methods:  1. Taiwan has already formed a negotiation team led by Vice Premier Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君). The team includes members from the National Security Council, the Office of Trade Negotiations, and relevant Executive Yuan ministries and agencies, as well as academia and industry. Like the US-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement, negotiations on tariffs can start from Taiwan-US bilateral zero-tariff treatment. 2. To expand purchases from the US and thereby reduce the trade deficit, the Executive Yuan has already completed an inventory regarding large-scale procurement plans for agricultural, industrial, petroleum, and natural gas products, and the Ministry of National Defense has also proposed a military procurement list. All procurement plans will be actively pursued. 3. Expand investments in the US. Taiwan’s cumulative investment in the US already exceeds US$100 billion, creating approximately 400,000 jobs. In the future, in addition to increased investment in the US by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, other industries such as electronics, ICT, petrochemicals, and natural gas can all increase their US investments, deepening Taiwan-US industry cooperation. Taiwan’s government has helped form a “Taiwan investment in the US” team, and hopes that the US will reciprocate by forming a “US investment in Taiwan” team to bring about closer Taiwan-US trade cooperation, jointly creating a future economic golden age.  4. We must eliminate non-tariff barriers to trade. Non-tariff barriers are an indicator by which the US assesses whether a trading partner is trading fairly with the US. Therefore, we will proactively resolve longstanding non-tariff barriers so that negotiations can proceed more smoothly. 5. We must resolve two issues that have been matters of longstanding concern to the US. One regards high-tech export controls, and the other regards illegal transshipment of dumped goods, otherwise referred to as “origin washing.” Strategy two: We must adopt a plan for supporting our industries. For industries that will be affected by the tariffs, and especially traditional industries as well as micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises, we will provide timely and needed support and assistance. Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) and his administrative team recently announced a package of 20 specific measures designed to address nine areas. Moving forward, the support we provide to different industries will depend on how they are affected by the tariffs, will take into account the particular features of each industry, and will help each industry innovate, upgrade, and transform. Strategy three: We must adopt medium- and long-term economic development plans. At this point in time, our government must simultaneously adopt new strategies for economic and industrial development. This is also the fundamental path to solutions for future economic challenges. The government will proactively cooperate with friends and allies, develop a diverse range of markets, and achieve closer integration of entities in the upper, middle, and lower reaches of industrial supply chains. This course of action will make Taiwan’s industrial ecosystem more complete, and will help Taiwanese industries upgrade and transform. We must also make good use of the competitive advantages we possess in such areas as semiconductor manufacturing, integrated chip design, ICT, and smart manufacturing to build Taiwan into an AI island, and promote relevant applications for food, clothing, housing, and transportation, as well as military, security and surveillance, next-generation communications, and the medical and health and wellness industries as we advance toward a smarter, more sustainable, and more prosperous new Taiwan. Strategy four: “Taiwan plus one,” i.e., new “Taiwan plus the US” arrangements: While staying firmly rooted in Taiwan, our enterprises are expanding their global presence and marketing worldwide. This has been our national economic development strategy, and the most important aspect is maintaining a solid base here in Taiwan. We absolutely must maintain a solid footing, and cannot allow the present strife to cause us to waver. Therefore, our government will incentivize investments, carry out deregulation, and continue to improve Taiwan’s investment climate by actively resolving problems involving access to water, electricity, land, human resources, and professional talent. This will enable corporations to stay in Taiwan and continue investing here. In addition, we must also help the overseas manufacturing facilities of offshore Taiwanese businesses to make necessary adjustments to support our “Taiwan plus one” policy, in that our national economic development strategy will be adjusted as follows: to stay firmly rooted in Taiwan while expanding our global presence, strengthening US ties, and marketing worldwide. We intend to make use of the new state of supply chains to strengthen cooperation between Taiwanese and US industries, and gain further access to US markets. Strategy five: Launch industry listening tours: All industrial firms, regardless of sector or size, will be affected to some degree once the US reciprocal tariffs go into effect. The administrative teams led by myself and Premier Cho will hear out industry concerns so that we can quickly resolve problems and make sure policies meet actual needs. My fellow citizens, over the past half-century and more, Taiwan has been through two energy crises, the Asian financial crisis, the global financial crisis, and pandemics. We have been able to not only withstand one test after another, but even turn crises into opportunities. The Taiwanese economy has emerged from these crises stronger and more resilient than ever. As we face this latest challenge, the government and civil society will work hand in hand, and I hope that all parties in the legislature, both ruling and opposition, will support the measures that the Executive Yuan will take to open up a broader path for Taiwan’s economy. Let us join together and give it our all. Thank you.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Grattan on Friday: Peter Dutton’s tax indexation ‘aspiration’ has merit – so why didn’t we hear about it before?

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra

    Peter Dutton, now seriously on the back foot, has made an extraordinarily big “aspirational” commitment at the back end of this campaign.

    He says he wants to see a move to indexing personal income tax – an assault on the “bracket creep” that sees people pushed into higher tax brackets when their income rises due to inflation.

    He suggests this would be a task for after a Coalition government had the budget back in shape, so he puts no timing on it.

    If Dutton is serious, this is the most radical proposal we’ve heard for the election, apart from the nuclear policy.

    The opposition leader produced the indexation idea, out of the blue, in an interview with The Australian, saying, “I want to see us move as quickly as we can as a country to changes around personal income tax, including indexation, because bracket creep, as we know, is a killer in the economy”.

    When there are widespread calls from business and experts for an overhaul of the taxation system, but apparent deafness from most politicians, dealing with bracket creep would be one major step forward.

    Economist Richard Holden from the University of New South Wales, is a strong advocate. “The current system has been built on tax increases on every working Australian all the time,” he says. An indexed system would be “more honest”, as well as forcing fiscal discipline on governments.

    The latter constraint is one big reason governments shy away from it. Bracket creep provides a huge amount of revenue automatically, and indexing tax brackets would be very costly. The spending discipline the system would then require is probably beyond any modern government, given the enormous demands from voters.

    There’s another point. Governments like to make good fellows of themselves by handing back some of this bracket creep in tax cuts at times of their choosing, particularly at elections – as we’ve seen this time.

    Ken Henry, former treasury secretary and lead author of the major taxation review commissioned by the Rudd government, urged indexation in a February speech outlining a blueprint for tax change.

    Henry is particularly concerned with intergenerational equity. “Young workers are being robbed by a tax system that relies increasingly upon fiscal drag,” he said. “Fiscal drag forces them to pay higher and higher average tax rates, even if their real incomes are falling.”

    A conservative government did index income tax, way back in Malcolm Fraser’s day, when the then-prime minister described it as a “great taxation reform”.

    Fraser argued: “Perhaps the single most important feature of the reform, is that it is not a once-and-for-all measure. It will continue to have significant beneficial effects in personal income tax payments from year to year”.

    The change, however, didn’t last long – after introducing it in 1976, Fraser cut it back in 1979 and then scrapped it in 1982.

    But, accepting the potential upsides of the idea, the fact that Dutton has come out with this ambitious, “aspirational” policy in this way, at this time, raises questions about his campaign strategy.

    If he means it, this should have been front and centre of his election pitch, advanced much earlier and cast as part of a reform agenda.

    Instead, all we got from the Liberals on tax was the weekend commitment to a one-off income tax offset. And that followed the party earlier saying it would not be able, for financial reasons, to produce anything at all. Also, of course, they rejected the modest tax cuts in the budget.

    Some Liberal sources say Dutton always intended to float the indexation idea. If so, he and those running the Liberals’ campaign missed a big opportunity.

    The other view is to think Dutton could have been freelancing – talking up his commitment to economic reform, going for an easy headline, but knowing he would never have to deliver. Most likely, he would not reach office. If he did win government – well, this was an “aspiration”, whose time would never arrive.

    Questioned on Thursday about his idea, Dutton argued the difficulty of writing tax policies from opposition.

    He pointed to the example of the Howard government, which unveiled the GST after winning power in 1996, then took it to a subsequent election in 1998.

    It is a risky precedent to highlight, however. John Howard promised in opposition he would “never, ever” bring in a GST. Dutton can’t afford to fan any suggestion that we don’t really know his full tax agenda – that he might surprise if he won.

    For its part, Labor this week found itself again caught in the weeds of a perennial tax debate – over whether, despite its denials, it might abolish the negative gearing tax break for property investors.

    Anthony Albanese kicked an own goal in Wednesday’s debate when he insisted the government hadn’t commissioned Treasury modelling on the impact of negative gearing for the housing market. There was much to-ing and fro-ing last year about this, but it finally became clear Treasurer Jim Chalmers had requested advice.

    Chalmers on Thursday made a Jesuitical distinction between asking Treasury for “a view” and commissioning modelling.

    “I said last year […] I sought a view. That’s different to commissioning modelling,” Chalmers told a news conference alongside Albanese. “The prime minister was asked about commissioning modelling. I sought a view.

    “The view from the Treasury is that a change to negative gearing wouldn’t get the sort of improvement that we desperately need to see in our economy when it comes to supply and that’s why our focus is not on changing that.”

    Pressed to “rule out” any changes to negative gearing, Chalmers said “we’re not proposing any changes in this area”.

    Dutton claimed Chalmers was “an advocate for the abolition of negative gearing”, and was “at war” with Albanese.

    Once again, the opposition is trying to sow doubt about what Labor might do, regardless of what it might say, on this thorny issue. Or, as the government claims, it is trying to distract from its own problems.

    Michelle Grattan does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    – ref. Grattan on Friday: Peter Dutton’s tax indexation ‘aspiration’ has merit – so why didn’t we hear about it before? – https://theconversation.com/grattan-on-friday-peter-duttons-tax-indexation-aspiration-has-merit-so-why-didnt-we-hear-about-it-before-254589

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI Russia: Business game from the company “Samolet”: students of SPbGASU tried themselves in the role of developers

    Translartion. Region: Russians Fedetion –

    Source: Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering – Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering – Students working on a residential development concept

    A business game organized by the construction company Samolet took place in the Growth Point space of SPbGASU.

    Students were able to immerse themselves in the developer’s profession: participants had to model their own project in the Leningrad Region – develop a concept for residential development, take into account social infrastructure and analyze economic indicators. All decisions were made in a team and under the guidance of experienced company specialists.

    During the game, students not only gained practical experience, but also learned more about career opportunities in the development industry, the specifics of project team work, and key skills that are in demand in the labor market.

    “Such events are an important part of professional orientation. They help future specialists make an informed choice of career path, as well as establish direct contact with industry representatives,” noted Ekaterina Abolina, Director of the Center for Student Entrepreneurship and Career at SPbGASU.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: 2nd round of indirect talks between Iran, US to be held in Rome

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    Italy’s capital Rome will be the venue for the second round of indirect negotiations between Tehran and Washington, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said.

    “Up to this point that we are speaking, we have received no new request from the other side for changing the location of the negotiations and Rome will be the venue for the second round,” Gharibabadi said in a live televised interview on Wednesday.

    The location of the talks was not a sensitive issue for the Iranian side. “We should concentrate on the main content and job,” he said.

    Regardless of the negotiations’ venue, Oman will continue to facilitate and mediate them, the official added.

    Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi met with U.S. special presidential envoy Steve Witkoff in Oman’s capital Muscat on Saturday over Tehran’s nuclear program, with both sides describing the meeting as “constructive.”

    The talks in Muscat followed U.S. President Donald Trump’s statement in early March that he had sent a letter to Iranian leaders, delivered through the United Arab Emirates, proposing negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program. Iran later agreed on indirect talks.

    Iran signed a nuclear deal in July 2015 with six major countries — Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States. Under the deal, Tehran agreed to limit its nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief.

    However, Trump unilaterally pulled his country out of the deal in May 2018 during his first term and reimposed sanctions on Iran, prompting Tehran to scale back its commitments under the deal. Since then, efforts to revive the nuclear agreement have made little progress.

    MIL OSI China News –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Demolition work starts as part of Spon End Regeneration Scheme

    Source: City of Coventry

    Demolition of blocks in the Spon End area of Coventry has officially started, marking a key milestone in the regeneration of the area.

    Housing association Citizen is working with The Hill Group to demolish Kerry House, Milestone House and Trafalgar House in Spon End. Coventry City Council, Homes England and West Midlands Combined Authority are key partners supporting the delivery of the project.

    To start with, works will take place inside the homes to all fixtures and fittings before the buildings are taken down.

    This marks the first stage in a huge regeneration project which will see more than 750 homes built across three phases.

    In the first phase, 158 homes will be demolished, and, subject to planning permission, 261 affordable homes will be built in their place. Of these homes 209 will be social rent homes and 52 will be rent to buy homes which are initially let at an intermediate rent of 80% of the market rent and can be later purchased.

    Director of Regeneration at Citizen, Kevin Roach, said: “We’re pleased to see demolition work at Spon End underway in the first phase of our regeneration project.

    “We’ve been working hard with our partners behind the scenes over the last few years on this regeneration project which will transform Spon End by providing more energy efficient affordable housing, increasing the area and quality of green open space and opening up the area of the River Sherbourne.

    “This is a major project to regenerate the area over the next 10 years and we have worked with the community to ensure that their priorities and feedback has influenced our plans for the area.

    “We’re looking forward to seeing the demolition progress over the next few months and to start on site in Spring 2026.”

    The three blocks which are being demolished were first built in the 1960s and have most recently been used as part of various BBC productions including This Town, My Name is Leon and Phoenix Rise.

    Cabinet Member for Jobs, Regeneration and Climate Change at Coventry City Council, Councillor Jim O’Boyle, said: “This is a really important regeneration scheme and one that is going to provide a lot of social and environmental benefits to the area.

    “I’ve visited the site and seen close-up the work underway to remove fittings and structures inside the buildings.

    “You can also see how dated and tired the existing housing and infrastructure looks, and it’s great to know that they will be replaced modern, warm and energy efficient homes, more quality green space and all with the River Sherbourne as a key feature.

    “It’s going to be a major improvement for the Spon End area and I’m looking forward to seeing work start to progress.”

    Cabinet Member for Housing and Communities at Coventry City Council, Councillor Naeem Akhtar, added: “I’m really interested in seeing the development of these new homes because it is vital that residents get every opportunity to live in good quality accommodation.

    “I know that there has been a lot of work already done by Citizen, partners and residents to get to this point, and the demolition of the existing buildings is an important moment.

    “We have more than a 1000 families and single people in temporary accommodation and to see the scheme really get underway, is good for our residents.” 

    Regional Managing Director at The Hill Group, Andy Fancy, said: “We’re excited to begin work on this important development site at Spon End. Successful projects are built on strong collaboration, and together with Citizen, Coventry City Council,  West Midlands Combined Authority, and the invaluable support of the local community, we’re poised to deliver energy-efficient, affordable homes that will enhance and enrich the local area.”

    Richard Parker, Mayor of the West Midlands, added: “Our region is brilliant at building houses but not always the kind that people can afford. We desperately need more social and affordable housing so that everyone in the region can have a safe, secure place to call home.

    “Already I’ve provided funding for more social homes than we’ve ever funded before. But the scale of the challenge means we have to work together to build the homes we need.

    “Spon End may be something of a TV star, but it’s no longer fit for purpose. It’s time to bring the curtain down on these old properties and replace them with new, high quality social homes.

    “It’s only by taking these bold decisions, and working together, that we can deliver what the region needs – homes for everyone.”

    Demolition works are due to be complete in early 2026, with plans to start building the new homes in Spring 2026. These homes, which will be one and two-bed flats, are due to be completed and handed over to customers late 2028.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-Evening Report: Keith Rankin Essay – Barbecued Hamburgers and Churchill’s Bestie

    Essay by Keith Rankin.

    Operation Gomorrah may have been the most cynical event of World War Two (WW2). Not only did the name fully convey the intent of the war crimes about to be committed, it, also represented the single biggest 24-hour murder toll for the European war that I have come across.

    Keith Rankin, trained as an economic historian, is a retired lecturer in Economics and Statistics. He lives in Auckland, New Zealand.

    On the night of 27 July 1943, the RAF murdered 35,000, mostly working-class civilian residents living in the most densely populated part of Hamburg; a planned firebombing which started a sequence of events – a holocaust if not The Holocaust – that ended in Nagasaki on 9 August 1945. (Note The bombing of Hamburg foreshadowed the horrors of Hiroshima, National Geographic, 23 July 2021.) A holocaust is a “destruction or slaughter on a mass scale, especially caused by fire or nuclear war” (Oxford Dictionary). [In The Holocaust, 31,000 Jews were shot dead in Kyiv in a single day in 1941; the worst single day of The Holocaust, I understand.]

    Hamburg was, literally, a dry run for what came later; the aim was to maximise the number of barbecued civilians by, among other things, choosing perfect weather conditions for an experiment in incendiary murder. (Yes, I am literally using inflammatory language.) While the total death toll of the week-long operation has been estimated to be over 40,000, the toll arising from the night of 27/28 July 1943 represents about 85% of the total.

    The Gomorrah chapter of Peter Hitchens’ The Phoney Victory, 2018, gives a documented account of the moral duplicity surrounding Churchill’s bombing campaign. For a full story of the Allies’ firestorm holocaust, see Black Snow: Curtis LeMay, the Firebombing of Tokyo, and the Road to the Atomic Bomb, 2022, by James M Scott. (John Lennon’s widow, Yoko Ono, is a survivor of the Tokyo episode, the raid that killed more people – over 100,000 – than any other in a single arsonous assault.)

    Sodom and Gomorrah

    These twin ‘cities of the plain’, which, if they ever existed, are now either under the Dead Sea or east of there, in modern Jordan. The key chapter in the bible (Genesis, ch.19) mainly emphasises Sodom, though Gomorrah was reputedly as ‘sinful’. The biblical story is ghastly, in its misogyny as well as its extollation of extermination of ‘others’.

    Genesis (ch.19) tells us, when Lot (Abraham’s nephew) found himself, in Sodom, hosting two Angels/men, ‘the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both young and old, all the people to the last man, surrounded the house; and they called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, so that we may know them.”‘ The secret to understanding this is the biblical meaning of the word ‘know’; in this case the events took place in Sodom, and the guests had the appearance of ‘men’.

    Lot replies: ‘”I beg you, my brothers, do not act so wickedly. Look, I have two daughters who have not known a man; let me bring them out to you, and do to them as you please; only do nothing to these men …”.’ While the men of Sodom did not take up the offer – they favoured Lot himself – the angel-men saved Lot and his family. Then ‘When morning dawned, the angels urged Lot, saying, “Get up, take your wife and your two daughters who are here, or else you will be consumed in the punishment of the city.”‘ …

    ‘When they had brought [the four of] them outside, [the angel-men] said, “Flee for your life; do not look back or stop anywhere in the Plain; flee to the hills, or else you will be consumed.” … Then the LORD rained on Sodom and Gomorrah sulfur and fire from the LORD out of heaven; and he overthrew those cities, and all the Plain, and all the inhabitants of the cities, and what grew on the ground. But Lot’s wife, behind him, looked back, and she became a pillar of salt.’ …

    After the three survivors settled in a cave: ‘the firstborn [daughter] said to the younger, “Our father is old, and there is not a man on earth to come in to us after the manner of all the world. Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, so that we may preserve offspring through our father.” … ‘Thus both the daughters of Lot became pregnant by their father.’ (Thus, the East Bank [of the River Jordan] was repopulated!!)

    Hamburg came to be equated with biblical Sodom, as deserving victims for a particularly barbaric form of mass murder. Neither Churchill, nor his bomber commander Arthur Harris, could know that only 35,000 Hamburgers would die as a result of that night’s operation. There is reason to believe that Churchill and his savants were looking for many more than hundreds of thousands of Germans to be ‘de-housed’ over the incendiary bombing campaign. (Dehousing was the euphemism used by Churchill’s men; compare with ‘resettlement’ for the trip that the residents of the Warsaw Ghetto made to Treblinka.)

    Hamburg and the Gomorrah holocaust

    Why Hamburg? Basically, because it was there. Though it was/is a large industrial and mercantile port city, the terror target was workers, not the works which employed them. The National Geographic article notes, with gallows-humour irony: “After noticing that Brits whose homes were struck by bombs were less likely to show up to work, analysts determined that destroying Germany’s largest cities and towns would likely cripple Germany’s war efforts.” Hamburg was close to England, and could be reached without flying over occupied land. And Hamburg was defended by a radar system of sorts, though not as sophisticated as British radar. The first British bombing raid on Hamburg was very much a technology test-run; refer The Woman Whose Invention Helped Win a War – and Still Baffles Weathermen, Irena Fischer-Hwang, 28 November 2018, Smithsonian Magazine. The second British raid on Hamburg was the real thing, a particularly dry run to really get the Gomorrah holocaust underway.

    Hitchens (p.178) says: “Winston Churchill speculated in a letter of 8 July I940 to his friend and Minister of Aircraft Production, the press magnate Lord (Max) Beaverbrook, that an ‘absolutely devastating exterminating [my emphasis] attack by very heavy bombers from this country upon the Nazi homeland would help to bring Hitler down’. Arthur Harris, later the chief of RAF Bomber Command, realised the significance of these extraordinary words … he kept a copy of this letter.”

    Hitchens (p.181) citing Bishop Bell speaking in February 1944 in the House of Lords: “Hamburg has a population of between one and two million people. It contains targets of immense military and industrial importance. It also happens to be the most democratic town in Germany where the Anti-Nazi opposition was strongest. … Practically all the buildings, cultural, military, residential, industrial, religious – including the famous University Library with its 800,000 volumes, of which three-quarters have perished – were razed to the ground.” While dead and dazed people may have low morale, and therefore have an arguable incentive to wage a civil war against their own government, they – especially the dead – are uniquely unable to overthrow a ruthlessly militarised government.

    We might note Hamburg’s anthropological links to England. At a time of high racial – indeed racist – sensibilities, Anglo-Saxon supremacy was a very real thing. The area of Germany around Hamburg is the ‘Hawaiki’ of the Anglo-Saxon people; Lower Saxony is the ancestral motherland of the English. The class-consciousness and revengeful bloodlust of the English political class outweighed their ethnic consciousness. This was not true for the German Nazis, for whom the English were racial equals; Hitler and his crew really did not want to kill English people. Nazi Germany wanted the United Kingdom to become a neutral country, as Ireland was, and as the United States was before December 1941. Nazi Germany’s policy was to enslave, resettle, and murder Slavs and Jews and Gypsies; not to kill or dehouse Englishmen and their families.

    The ‘elephant in the room’ was Josef Stalin.

    Hitchens (p.191): “There is little doubt that much of the bombing of Germany was done to please and appease Josef Stalin. Stalin jeered at Churchill for his failure to open a Second Front and to fight Hitler’s armies in Europe, and ceaselessly pressed him to open such a front – something Churchill was politically and militarily reluctant to do. Bombing Germany, though it did not satisfy Stalin’s demands for an invasion, at least reassured him that we were doing something, and so lessened his pressure to open a second front.”

    Hitchens (p.198): “Overy [in The Bombing War 2014] recounts how on 28 March 1945 Winston Churchill, clearly growing sick of the violence he had unleashed as victory approached and the excuses for it grew thinner, referred (in a memorandum) to Harris’s bombing tactics using these exact words. He urged, none too soon, that attacks turn instead to oil and transport. Harris paid no attention, and right up until 24th April 1945, his bombers continued to drop incendiaries and high explosives on German cities, turning many thousands of civilians into corpses.” [Hitler committed suicide on 30 April 1945, and VE Day was 8 May.]

    Point of Interest: Churchill contested three elections, all after VE Day, all using Great Britain’s ‘first-past-the-post’ plurality system. He won just one of those three, though even then – in 1951 – his party got fewer votes than a Labour Party seeking re-election at a time of great difficulty for left-wing parties worldwide. Churchill’s Conservative Party got way-fewer votes than Labour in 1945 and 1950. The pressure on Prime Minister Clement Attlee to call the UK snap election of 1951 (one-third of the way through the term of his elected Labour government) can be understood as a successful example of political cunning on the part of the British establishment; literally a King’s coup.

    A Scale of ‘Evil’?

    While I generally hesitate to use the word ‘evil’, it may still be useful to grade very powerful people on a zero-to-ten scale of malevolence. On zero we might have the pacifist version of Jesus. On ten would be some very powerful person who actively sought nuclear ‘Armageddon’ (which would destroy life, not just humanity). After recently reading some quite difficult literature about World War Two, this is where I would place five powerful leaders:

    • 9: Josef Stalin
    • 8: Adolf Hitler
    • 7: Benito Mussolini, Winston Churchill
    • 6: Harry Truman

    I need to read more about Truman; though, his legacy seems to have been airbrushed much as Churchill’s has been, and I might decide to upgrade him to a 7.

    I would also note that these leaders had their close and powerful henchmen, whose ‘evilness’ can also be rated on such a scale, for example:

    • 9.5: Lavrenty Beria
    • 9: Josef Goebbels, Heinrich Himmler

    Overall regimes can be better or worse than their leaders. I would rate both Stalin’s ‘Communists’ and Hitler’s ‘Nazis’ as both 8.5. Thus, Stalin’s regime was not quite as bad as its two most notorious figures. And Hitler’s regime was even worse than Hitler; that’s certainly not being kind to Hitler! (Stalin’s atrocities, the equal of Hitlers, were mostly committed in peacetime; the vast majority of Hitler’s were committed in wartime.)

    ‘Favourites’ as intimate (though not necessarily sexual) friends of powerful leaders

    Churchill’s regime was not as bad as Churchill. Though Churchill had two favourites, both active members of his regime – especially his ‘Kitchen Cabinet’ – who were worse than him (possibly worse in one case, and definitely worse in the other). The ‘possibly worse’ one was Brendan Bracken, Minister for Information. Bracken, the prototype for ‘Big Brother’ in George Orwell’s book Nineteen Eighty-Four, was Churchill’s Goebbels. Orwell’s ‘Ministry of Truth’ was a conflation of the Ministry of Information and Orwell’s wartime employer, the BBC. (Born in Ireland, Bracken was sometimes rumoured to have been Churchill’s ‘love child’, though that supposition is most likely untrue.) Surprisingly little has been written about BB.

    The ‘definitely worse’ favourite was German born (Baden Baden) and educated (Darmstadt and Berlin) scientist, Frederick A Lindemann; who was granted the title Lord Cherwell in 1941. He built his career in Britain at Oxford University, becoming Professor of Physics there in 1919. He also became a bit of a wartime ‘test pilot’, managing to establish his loyalty to the United Kingdom. His close friendship with Churchill lasted decades, beginning in 1921.

    Frederick Lindemann, aka Lord Cherwell

    In my assessment, Lindemann is the closest individual yet to a ten-out-of-ten on the above-suggested scale of malevolence. Let’s say that, if World War Three comes and someone like Lindemann has as much access to the levers of power as Lindemann actually had, then the world would be a goner. (In Lindemann’s defence, it has been noted that he was fond of children and animals. Likewise, another man; one with a famous moustache.)

    Frederick Lindemann exerted a beguiling influence over Churchill. When Churchill was not in power, in the 1930s, Lindemann ran a private think-tank for Churchill. In the 1930s he allegedly undermined the scientific development of radar, which proved critical to the defence of Britain from Luftwaffe attacks; indeed, Lindemann seems to have shown a lack of interest in military defence; his thing was the elimination or dehumanisation of ‘others’. Lindemann “was one of the first to urge the importance of atom bomb research” (Where to Read about Professor Lindemann, The Churchill Project, 6 May 2015); indeed “Following his 1945 return to the Clarendon Laboratory, Lindemann created the [United Kingdom] Atomic Energy Authority”, Wikipedia.)

    I will illustrate the Lindemann problem with quotes from these three sources; some may argue that I have made a biased selection, but so be it:

    • The Most Powerful Scientist Ever: Winston Churchill’s Personal Technocrat, Madhusree Mukerjee, Scientific American, 6 August 2010
    • The ‘Gomorrah’ chapter of Peter Hitchens’ The Phoney Victory 2018
    • The Prime Minister and the Prof, by Malcolm Gladwell (transcript), 13 July 2017

    Mukerjee: “Known as the Prof to admirers (because of his academic credentials and his brilliance) and as Baron Berlin to detractors (thanks to his German accent and aristocratic tastes), Lindeman was responsible for the government’s scientific decisions.”

    Mukerjee: “Lindemann attended meetings of the War Cabinet, accompanied the prime minister on conferences abroad, and sent him an average of one missive a day. He saw Churchill almost daily for the duration of the war and wielded more influence than any other civilian adviser.”

    Gladwell: “I think that’s the crucial fact about Lindemann. One time he’s asked for his definition of morality and he answers, ‘I define a moral action as one that brings advantage to my friends.’ … The man who defined a moral action as ‘One that brings advantage to my friends,’ was best friends with Winston Churchill.”

    Gladwell: “Lindemann becomes a kind of gatekeeper to Churchill’s mind.”

    Mukerjee: “On most matters Lindemann’s and Churchill’s opinions converged; and when they did not, the scientist worked ceaselessly to change his friend’s mind.”

    Mukerjee: “The mission of the S branch [Churchill’s nearest equivalent to DOGE] was to provide rationales for whichever course the prime minister, as interpreted by the Prof, wished to follow.”

    Mukerjee: “Department heads ‘began to realize that, like it or not, the Prof was the man whom Churchill trusted most, and that all their refutations, aspersions, innuendos or attempts at exposure would not shift Churchill from his undeviating loyalty to the Prof by one hair’s breadth,’ wrote [economist] Harrod. So it was that the Prof would pronounce judgment on the best use of shipping space, the profligacy of the army, the inadequacy of British supplies, the optimal size of the mustard gas stockpile, the necessity of bombing German houses – and, when the time came, the pointlessness of sending famine relief to Bengal.”

    Gladwell: “An argument took place at the highest reaches of British government. The question was what was the best use of the royal air force against the Germans? … One school of thought says, ‘Let’s use our bombers to support military activities, protecting ships against German U-boats, destroying German factories.’ The other school of thought argues that bombing ought to serve a bigger, strategic purpose. In other words, ‘Let’s use bombing to break the will of the German people, let’s make their lives so miserable that they give up.’”

    Wikipedia: On dehousing, Lindemann says “bombing must be directed to working class houses. Middle class houses have too much space round them, so are bound to waste bombs”.

    Gladwell on Lindemann’s dishonesty: “Lindemann’s memo to Churchill. It’s very matter of fact; it’s all about what the data says except for one thing. That’s not what the data says. The Birmingham-Hull study reached the exact opposite conclusion [about working-class morale] that Lindemann did.”

    Gladwell: “Other experts [eg Henry Tizard] in the government, critics of strategic bombing, point out immediately that Lindemann’s numbers are ridiculous, five or six times too high, based on obvious errors.” [Hitchens (p.205) claims that the numbers of civilian casualties were only ten percent of what Lindemann had promised. If you multiply by ten the number of civilians – mostly workers, their families, slaves, and refugees – killed in the totality of the Gomorrah holocaust, you get a number bigger than deaths in The Holocaust; this would be a measure of Lindemann’s intent.]

    Gladwell: “One of Lindemann’s friends said, ‘He would not shrink from using an argument which he knew to be wrong if, by so doing, he could tie up one of his professional opponents.’ Lindemann wanted strategic bombing, so Churchill went ahead and ordered the bombing of German cities.”

    Gladwell: “Most historians agree that strategic bombing was a disaster. 160,000 US and English airmen and hundreds of thousands of German civilians were killed in those bombing campaigns. Many of Europe’s most beautiful cities were destroyed and German morale didn’t crack; the Germans fought to the bitter end. After the war, the Nobel Prize winning physicist Patrick Blackett wrote a devastating essay where he said that the war could have been won six months or even a year earlier, if only the British had used their bombers more intelligently.” [Note that the whole Gomorrah holocaust killed more Japanese civilians than German civilians; as noted in Black Snow: Curtis LeMay, the Firebombing of Tokyo, and the Road to the Atomic Bomb, the Hamburg dry run led more-or-less directly to the fire-bombings of almost every urban centre in Japan.]

    Mukerjee: “‘Love me, love my dog, and if you don’t love my dog you damn well can’t love me,’ muttered a furious Churchill in 1941, after a member of the House of Commons had raised questions about the Prof’s influence.” [Gladwell: that “row occurred in 1942 and it occurred over strategic bombing”.]

    Mukerjee: “Cherwell believed that a small circle of the intelligent and the aristocratic should run the world. ‘Those who succeed in getting what everyone wants must be the ablest,’ he asserted. The Prof regarded the masses as ‘very stupid,’ considered Australians to be inferior to Britons, advocated ‘harshness’ toward homosexuals, and thought criminals should be treated cruelly because ‘the amount of pleasure derived by other people from the knowledge that a malefactor is being punished far exceeds in sum total the amount of pain inflicted on a malefactor by his punishment.’” [Enjoyment arising from the punishment of the wretched outweighs the suffering of those wretched!]

    Mukerjee: “Eugenic ideas also feature in a lecture that Lord Cherwell (then known as Professor Lindemann) had delivered more than once, probably in the early 1930s. He had detailed a science-based solution to a challenge that occupied many an intellect of the time: preserving for eternity the hegemony of the superior classes.”

    Mukerjee: “New technologies such as surgery, mind control, and drug and hormone manipulations would one day allow humans to be fine-tuned for specific tasks. … ‘Somebody must perform dull, dreary tasks, tend machines, count units in repetition work; is it not incumbent on us, if we have the means, to produce individuals without a distaste for such work, types that are as happy in their monotonous occupation as a cow chewing the cud?’ Lindemann asked. Science could yield a race of humans blessed with ‘the mental make-up of the worker bee.’ This subclass would do all the unpleasant work and not once think of revolution or of voting rights: ‘Placid content rules in the bee-hive or ant-heap.’ The outcome would be a perfectly peaceable and stable society, ‘led by supermen and served by helots.’”

    Mukerjee: “At least no one would demand votes on behalf of an ape. … To consolidate the rule of supermen – to perpetuate the British Empire – one need only remove the ability of slaves to see themselves as slaves.”

    Gladwell: “How can you have a real debate against Churchill’s best friend? Friendship comes first.”

    Gladwell: “The US starts sending over so many ships that, by late 1943 when the famine in Bengal is at its height, there’s actually a surplus of boats on the allied side. In fact, in 1943, the British actually start shipping wheat from Australia up through the Indian Ocean, just not to India. … British ships full of grain are sailing right past India on the way to the Middle East to be stored for some future, hypothetical need. They might even stop and refuel in Mumbai, but nothing leaves the ship. … Why is Lindemann [as Paymaster General] refusing to help? It doesn’t even make illogical sense. Indian soldiers, hundreds of thousands of them, are fighting the Germans in the Middle East and Africa. When other countries like Canada and the United States offered to send food to India, the British say, ‘We don’t want it.’ They turn down help. Lindemann seems completely unmoved by India’s plight.”

    Gladwell: “Black people, according to a friend, filled him with a physical revulsion which he was unable to control. But I’m not sure that we’re seeing Lindemann here; I think we’re seeing Churchill. Churchill is the one with an issue about India. He’s obsessed with India. In the years leading up to the war, Gandhi is building his independence movement within India and Churchill hates Gandhi. Churchill is furious about the fact that Britain has to buy raw materials from India, meaning that the master is running up a debt with its supposed subject. … Why was Lindemann so adamant that England could not help India? Because Churchill was adamant that England could not help India and Lindemann was a loyal friend.”

    CP Snow (1960), cited by Gladwell: “The Lindemann-Churchill relation is the most fascinating example of court politics that we’re likely to see.” [hmmm!]

    Gladwell: “The best guess of how many died in the Bengal famine of 1943 is three million people. Three million. After the war, the British government held a formal inquiry into what happened, but the investigation was forbidden to consider, and I’m quoting, ‘Her Majesty’s government’s decision in regard to shipping of imports.’ In other words, they were asked to investigate the cause of the famine without investigating the cause of the famine.”

    Hitchens (p.197): “Gas attacks were contemplated by Winston Churchill. … Overy writes ‘The RAF staff thought that incendiary and high-explosive raids were more strategically efficient [than gas or germ warfare], in that they destroyed property and equipment and not just people, but in any of these cases – blown apart, burnt alive or asphyxiated – deliberate damage to civilian populations was now taken for granted. This paved the way for the possibility of using atomic weapons on German targets in 1945’.”

    It also paved the way for the potentially devastating anthrax attacks on Germany which would have taken place in 1944 had the American-led D-day offensive been unsuccessful; contamination from such attacks would have rendered parts of Germany uninhabitable for a human lifetime. (See my Invoking Munich, ‘Appeasement’, and the ‘Lessons of History’ 13 March 2025, which mentions both the Bengal famine and the anthrax program as well as the Hamburg holocaust.) The anthrax program bears the hallmark of Lindemann; the abandoned anthrax operation was dubbed Operation Vegetarian, in part a likely reference to Lindemann’s famed dietary obsessions.

    Hitchens (pp.200-201): “It is surprising that Sir Max Hasting’s Bomber Command (first published in 1979) has not begun to change opinions. … Sir Max deserves much credit for the chapter in which he describes the indefensible destruction of the city of Darmstadt [south of Frankfurt] on 11 September 1944 (it was not, in any significant way, a military target). Hastings: ‘The first terrible discoveries were made: cellars crammed with suffocated bodies – worse still, with amorphous heaps of melted and charred humanity’.” (Lindemann went to school in Darmstadt. Victims most likely included his former classmates, teachers and their families.)

    Hitchens (p.206), on the battle between Frederick Lindemann and Henry Tizard (the scientist who stood up to Lindeman, and paid a price): “Why is the only considerable account of this battle trapped inside [a] small, obscure volume that the reader must retrieve from deep in a few impenetrable scholarly libraries? Why is it not taught in schools? Why has nobody written a play about it? I suspect it is because this story, if well known, would undermine the shallow, nonsensical cult of Winston Churchill as the infallible Great Leader, a cult to which, surely, an adult country no longer needs to cling.”

    Hitchens (p.205): “Tizard said that Lindemann’s estimate of the possible destruction was five times too high. He was supported by Patrick Blackett, a former naval officer who had become a noted physicist high in the scientific councils of the day. He would later win the Nobel Prize in Physics, and be ennobled as Lord Blackett. Blackett independently advised that Lindemann’s estimate was six times too high. ‘Both were slightly out. But they were nothing like as wrong as Lindemann was. Lindemann’s estimate of destruction was in fact ten times too high, as the postwar bombing survey revealed.” [The actual destruction of German cities was only one-tenth of what Lindemann had hoped and argued would be the case. Given the actual hundreds of thousands of barbecued German civilians, Lindemann had been arguing for millions.]

    CP Snow (1960), cited by Hitchens (p.205): “It is possible, I suppose, that some time in the future people living in a more benevolent age than ours may turn over the official records and notice that men like us, well-educated by the standards of the day, men fairly kindly by the standards of the day, and often possessed of strong human feelings, made the kind of calculation I have just been describing. … Will they think that we resigned our humanity? They will have the right.” [Strikingly, although the post-war years have generally been regarded as ‘more benevolent’, the Gomorrah holocaust continues to ‘fly under the radar’. Indeed, so much so that Churchill’s speeches have been nominated as part of New Zealand’s schools’ draft English curriculum! (And that matter of Churchill was not raised by the New Zealand media; they were more interested in the ‘controversial’ possibility that Shakespeare might be compulsory.)]

    Winston Churchill was not a nice man. His ‘favourite’ – Frederick Lindemann – was rather less nice.

    Lessons

    War itself is the problem, and the first casualty of war is truth. Drumbeating for war is cheap, and sabres are easily rattled. We stumble into wars without having any realistic idea how they might end; casual war becomes forever war. Wars involve multiple nasty people from the outset, and other similarly nasty people come to the fore during war, sometimes completely behind the scenes.

    War changes much but solves little. World War Two was the first war in which civilians were targeted on an industrial scale. It ended, in Europe at least, in a Pyrrhic manner, with Josef Stalin’s USSR as the annihilist of Nazi Germany.

    War in the modern age of globalisation means this and more. In a twenty-first century World War, while targeted civilians will be high on the murder list, the biggest death-counts are likely to be of untargeted civilians – residents of semi-belligerent and non-belligerent countries – and of completely guiltless non-human life forms.

    If the Americans hadn’t successfully prosecuted D-Day (Operation Overlord) in 1944, I believe that Winston Churchill would have used the RAF to unleash his anthrax bombs. The Scottish island of Gruinard is only now becoming habitable, after eighty years of anthrax contamination. Imagine parts of Germany becoming uninhabitable – for nearly a century – had Operation Vegetarian been executed.

    ————-

    Keith Rankin (keith at rankin dot nz), trained as an economic historian, is a retired lecturer in Economics and Statistics. He lives in Auckland, New Zealand.

     

    MIL OSI Analysis – EveningReport.nz –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Change of British High Commissioner to Ghana

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Press release

    Change of British High Commissioner to Ghana

    Mr Christian Rogg has been appointed British High Commissioner to the Republic of Ghana.

    Mr Christian Rogg has been appointed British High Commissioner to the Republic of Ghana in succession to Ms Harriet Thompson who will be transferring to another Diplomatic Service appointment.  Mr Rogg will take up his appointment during July 2025.

    Curriculum vitae           

    Full name: Christian Stefan Rogg                                               

    Year Role
    2023 to present FCDO, Director for Development and Open Societies
    2021 to 2023  FCDO, Director for Development, Parliament, Coordination and Capability
    2017 to 2021 Addis Ababa, Development Director
    2015 to 2017  Kinshasa, Head of DFID
    2012 to 2015  Abuja, Acting/Deputy Head of DFID
    2009 to 2012  Hanoi, Acting/Deputy Head of DFID
    2006 to 2009 Accra, Head of Governance and Growth Team, DFID
    2003 to 2006  DFID, Head of Growth Team, Policy Division
    2000 to 2003  DFID, Economic Adviser/Acting Team Leader, Private Sector Policy Department
    2001 University of Oxford, Instructor, Department of Economics
    1999 to 2000 DFID, Assistant Adviser, Business Partnerships Department
    1999 University of Oxford, Researcher, Development Studies Centre
    1998  Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, Assistant, Private Sector Department
    1995 to 1997  PricewaterhouseCoopers, Washington, Consultant, Economics and Finance Division
    1995 Senator Joe Lieberman’s Office, United States Senate, Legislative Intern
    1994 SmithKline Beecham, Assistant to Director for Business Planning and Analysis
    1993  Merrill Lynch, Frankfurt, Assistant to Financial Consultants
    1990 to 1992  DG Bank, Frankfurt, Trainee

    Media enquiries

    Email newsdesk@fcdo.gov.uk

    Telephone 020 7008 3100

    Contact the FCDO Communication Team via email (monitored 24 hours a day) in the first instance, and we will respond as soon as possible.

    Share this page

    The following links open in a new tab

    • Share on Facebook (opens in new tab)
    • Share on Twitter (opens in new tab)

    Updates to this page

    Published 17 April 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom –

    April 17, 2025
  • MIL-OSI China: Think Asia Forum 2025 presents Asian wisdom

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    The Think Asia Forum 2025 was held on April 15 in Singapore with a strong critique of U.S. trade policies and calls for greater Asian cooperation, as over 40 experts from across the region gathered to address global governance challenges.

    Cao Zhongming, Chinese ambassador to Singapore, delivers the opening address for the Think Asia Forum 2025 in Singapore, April 15, 2025. [Photo courtesy of ACCWS]

    Cao Zhongming, the Chinese ambassador to Singapore, delivered a pointed opening address, condemning the recent U.S. tariff war against the world. “The reckless abuse of tariffs has severely violated legitimate rights of nations, undermined the rules-based multilateral trading system and disrupted the global economic order,” he told attendees. “Such unilateral and protectionist acts weaponize tariffs for selfish gains at the expense of global economic stability and Asian development.”

    Ambassador Cao positioned China as a defender of multilateralism, stating: “China will continue taking resolute measures to safeguard its sovereignty, security and development interests while opening its doors wider to the world.” He urged Asian nations to unite against protectionism and economic bullying, and strengthen cooperation to safeguard the stability of the global economic order, emphasizing that “development is a universal right of all nations, not the privilege of a select few.”

    The forum was co-sponsored by China International Communications Group (CICG), Tsinghua University and Nanyang Technological University (NTU) Singapore. Organizers included the Academy of Contemporary China and World Studies (ACCWS), Tsinghua University’s School of Journalism and Communication, the Center for International Security and Strategy, and the Institute for Global Industry, as well as NTU’s Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information.

    Think tank experts and scholars from China, Singapore, Japan, India and other Asian nations gave speeches and engaged in in-depth discussions in front of approximately 200 audience members. The opening remarks were moderated by Zhou Qing’an, dean of Tsinghua’s School of Journalism and Communication, while the keynote speeches and special dialogue sessions were moderated by Wang Xiaohui, editor-in-chief of China.org.cn and special research fellow at ACCWS.

    President of Tsinghua University Li Luming highlighted Asia’s cultural ties as foundational for cooperation, stating, “Our civilizations provide enduring wisdom to address today’s challenges.”

    Yu Yunquan, vice president of CICG and president of ACCWS, speaks at the Think Asia Forum 2025 in Singapore, April 15, 2025. [Photo courtesy of ACCWS]

    Yu Yunquan, vice president of CICG and president of ACCWS, observed that Asia and the world face growing instabilities and uncertainties. “The intensification of major-country competition and geopolitical tensions has raised widespread concerns,” he noted. Yu added that think tanks across Asia bear unique and critical responsibilities in advancing the region’s shared future, and can help regional countries enhance political mutual trust and align their interests.

    “The U.S.’s recent erratic ‘tariff extortion’ demonstrates how instability, uncertainty and unpredictability have become the norm in our turbulent world. Such volatility is eroding the stable environment essential for all nations’ development and harming the welfare of people worldwide — including Americans,” Yu said, noting that Asia is home to many developing countries and emerging economies, with export-oriented industries that are particularly vulnerable to deteriorating international trade conditions. “We urge Asian nations to unite in supporting multilateralism and global trade development, ensuring our region remains both an anchor of stability and an engine of growth.”

    Professor Ernst J. Kuipers, vice president of NTU Singapore, emphasized that higher education institutions serve as guardians of human civilization and carry a critical responsibility to advance global development amid today’s challenges and opportunities. “Science communication is essential to dispel misconceptions and cultivate rational consensus,” he said. 

    Zhu Guangyao, former Chinese vice minister of finance, warned of serious global challenges — from weakened multilateralism and climate setbacks to unregulated AI and rising geopolitical tensions. He called on Asian nations to build a shared future, promoting peace and cooperation to stabilize the region and support global development. Citing Asia’s economic strength, Zhu urged the region to uphold values of “peace, cooperation, openness and inclusiveness” to strengthen solidarity and institutional development while advancing trade, financial ties, regional free trade processes, digital economy collaboration and financial safety mechanisms to meet common challenges and drive inclusive growth.

    Former Minister of State for the Prime Minister’s Office in Singapore Chan Soo Sen emphasized that amid global turbulence, Asian nations should draw upon traditional Asian wisdom — beginning with self-reflection and internal consolidation to build collective resilience. For Singapore, he said, facing risks of constrained international trade, it must strengthen social cohesion and government credibility to bridge potential divides and safeguard diversity and coexistence. He highlighted how Asia’s cultural emphasis on neighborly relations and cooperative spirit should guide enhanced regional collaboration to navigate an uncertain future together.

    Alfred Schipke, director of the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore (NUS), believes Asia can become a key growth engine through deeper reforms and fewer barriers. With the rise of multipolarization, Asia should take on a larger role in trade, investment and financial cooperation, he explained, while countries must pursue stability through pragmatic partnerships to help reshape global governance.

    (Left to right) Wang Xiaohui, editor-in-chief of China.org.cn, moderates a special dialogue session between renowned historian Wang Gungwu, and Dong Qiang, dean of Yenching Academy at Peking University, at the Think Asia Forum 2025 in Singapore, April 15, 2025. [Photo courtesy of ACCWS]

    A highlight of the forum was the special dialogue between Wang Gungwu, renowned historian and former chairman of the East Asian Institute at NUS, and Dong Qiang, dean of Yenching Academy at Peking University, which explored how Asian wisdom can inform global governance. 

    Wang emphasized its openness and adaptability — absorbing new ideas, respecting diverse civilizations and rejecting extremism. Meanwhile, Dong noted that traditional wisdom can be reshaped into modern governance tools, with its strength lying in flexibility and responsiveness. Both agreed that Asian wisdom, rooted in openness and mutual respect, should contribute the strength of cultural civilization to the development of a more equitable global governance system.

    Tuesday’s three parallel sessions featuring other speakers addressed themes of “Exchanges and Mutual Learning: The Coexistence of Diverse Asian Civilizations,” “Security and Stability: Asia’s Future in a Changing World” and “Development and Sharing: Asian Wisdom for Global Recovery,” reflecting the region’s push for greater collective influence amid global uncertainties.

    Participants attending the Think Asia Forum 2025 in Singapore, April 15, 2025. [Photo courtesy of ACCWS]

    The forum concluded by launching a cooperation network of Asian think tanks, with ACCWS serving as secretariat to coordinate input from all parties and promote the network’s development.

    MIL OSI China News –

    April 17, 2025
←Previous Page
1 … 708 709 710 711 712 … 1,471
Next Page→
NewzIntel.com

NewzIntel.com

MIL Open Source Intelligence

  • Blog
  • About
  • FAQs
  • Authors
  • Events
  • Shop
  • Patterns
  • Themes

Twenty Twenty-Five

Designed with WordPress