Category: Russian Federation

  • MIL-OSI Russia: With the support of Rosneft, the Days of Culture of Indigenous Peoples of the Tyumen Region opened

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Rosneft – Rosneft – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    With the support of RN-Uvatneftegaz (part of Rosneft), the Days of Indigenous Peoples Culture have started in the Tyumen Region. It is expected that over 1,200 guests will visit the festival in two weeks.

    In the ethnographic center “Uvas Mir Hot” (House of Northern People), created with the support of “RN-Uvatneftegaz”, guests get acquainted with the rich culture of northern ethnic groups, their customs and traditions. The concert program of the opening of the festival included performances by dancers and throat singers accompanied by a jaw harp. Excursions around the ethnic camp were organized for adults and children, and they could also take part in games in national sports and taste dishes of national cuisine.

    The Days of Culture will include interactive excursions and themed events for schoolchildren and large families. For residents of the Uvatsky District, the festival will also include performances by creative groups, competitions in national sports “Northern All-Around”, master classes in arts and crafts, an exhibition of photographs and works by northern poets and writers. Guests of the festival will also be able to watch the film “Master of the Taiga”, which introduces the unique culture and way of life of the Eastern Khanty. The festival program will end in the Uvatsky District, where 30 families of indigenous peoples live in 11 camps today.

    The assistance of the oil producing company RN-Uvatneftegaz in organizing this and other traditional national holidays helps popularize culture and strengthen ties between families and generations.

    The territory of “Uvas Mir Hot” hosts ritual festivals and cultural events, concerts, interactive excursions, local history and national language lessons, and master classes all year round. To immerse guests in the culture and life of indigenous peoples, the ethnic camp has recreated in detail a Khanty hut, a Nenets tent in summer and winter versions, a storage shed for food, a kitchen with a clay oven, a hunter’s hut, and animal enclosures. Interest in the “House of Northern People” is growing – since the beginning of the year, it has been visited by 14,800 tourists.

    Preservation of the national culture of the indigenous peoples of the North is one of the significant areas of Rosneft’s social policy. The Company’s enterprises implement many social projects in the regions of their operations, develop the infrastructure of northern villages, help reindeer herder families, improve the material and technical base of educational institutions, social and medical facilities in areas of traditional residence.

    RN-Uvatneftegaz, together with the administration of the Uvatsky municipal district, supports representatives of the Khanty, Mansi and Evenki of the Tyumen region, providing comprehensive assistance in preserving their way of life. The company pays for the education of young people in secondary specialized and higher educational institutions, finances participation in competitions in a national sport – oblas (boat) races. Oil workers provide access to winter roads and ice crossings that are built for production needs, organize the distribution of fuel at the fields closest to the camps. The company is also one of the organizers of the annual festival “Wealth of the Uvat Taiga”, which includes a fair of goods of traditional crafts and trades of indigenous peoples living in the Uvatsky district.

    Reference:

    RN-Uvatneftegaz LLC, a subsidiary of Rosneft Oil Company, is conducting exploration and development of a group of fields located in the Uvatsky District of the Tyumen Region and the Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Okrug-Yugra. The Uvatsky project includes 19 licensed areas, their total area exceeds 25 thousand square kilometers.

    Department of Information and Advertising of PJSC NK Rosneft October 22, 2024

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Sobyanin: Sports complex to be built in Rostokino district

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    Plans have been approved for the construction of two social and public-business infrastructure facilities, which will create over 1,100 jobs. This was reported in on your telegram channel Sergei Sobyanin reported.

    “Plans for the construction of two facilities in the north-east and west of Moscow have been approved: a sports complex on Selskokhozyaistvennaya Street in the Rostokino district and a multifunctional business center on Vereiskaya Street in the Mozhaisky district. They will be built at the expense of investors program to stimulate the creation of employment opportunitiesAs a result, the city will receive over 1.1 thousand new jobs,” the Mayor of Moscow wrote.

    Source: Sergei Sobyanin’s Telegram channel @mos_sobyanin

    The program to stimulate the creation of multi-apartment buildings was approved by the Moscow Government in 2019 (Resolution No. 1874-PP of December 31, 2019) to attract housing developers to actively build industrial, business, social, cultural and other important facilities for the city. Investors who simultaneously create jobs while constructing multi-apartment buildings receive a benefit on payments to change the type of permitted use of land for housing construction.

    The implementation of the program stimulates balanced integrated development of new districts, reduces the shortage of jobs in neighborhoods with established planning, and also reduces excessive pendulum migration.

    Over the four years of its implementation, the program to stimulate the creation of employment opportunities has covered almost all districts of the city. The Moscow government has concluded more than 130 agreements with investors, which provide for the construction of over six million square meters of commercial real estate – these are industrial enterprises, logistics complexes, office and retail facilities, as well as educational, cultural and sports institutions. In total, more than two trillion rubles will be attracted to the development of the city and the creation of employment opportunities. As a result, over 290 thousand jobs will appear in almost all sectors of the capital’s economy.

    Developers can apply for special status at Moscow investment portal.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    https://vvv.mos.ru/major/themes/11932050/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: A competition for reconstruction projects of the theater “Grandfather Durov’s Corner” has been announced

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    The Moscow Committee for Architecture announced contest for the reconstruction of the complex of buildings of the theater “Grandfather Durov’s Corner”. The building with a small stage and a museum, which is a cultural heritage site, will be restored, its historical appearance will be preserved. This was reported by the chief architect of the capital, first deputy chairman of the Committee for Architecture and Urban Development Sergey Kuznetsov.

    “Due to the fact that the main building is not only a cultural heritage site, but also an important landmark for Muscovites, it was decided to select the best architectural concept for the new theater facilities through an architectural competition. Currently, the theater does not meet modern requirements either technically or functionally. The competitors will have to develop a unique proposal, within the framework of which the existing complex of buildings will be modernized. We invite leading Moscow bureaus with experience in working with cultural heritage sites, reconstruction and restoration of varying complexity to participate,” Sergei Kuznetsov specified.

    The reconstruction project will affect building 2, buildings 1 and 2, building 4, buildings 1 and 2, and building 4, block 2 on Durov Street. One of the theater buildings is an architectural monument of regional significance. This is an old mansion built by the Austrian architect August Weber in 1894, where the theater founder Vladimir Durov lived and worked from 1908.

     

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    http://vvv.mos.ru/nevs/item/145601073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: The city has provided over 10 hectares of land for the implementation of large-scale investment projects in the South-East Administrative District

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    Since the beginning of the year, the city has transferred seven land plots in the southeast of the capital to investors and developers as part of the implementation of large-scale investment projects (MaIP). This was reported by Deputy Mayor of Moscow for Urban Development Policy and Construction Vladimir Efimov.

    “The city has allocated to investors for lease without bidding almost 10.7 hectares of land in the territory of the South-Eastern Administrative District for the construction of industrial, educational, commercial and other facilities as part of the implementation of large-scale investment projects. The contracts have been concluded for five years, during which the construction of real estate with a total area of almost 170 thousand square meters should be completed,” said Vladimir Efimov.

    A large-scale investment project is a special status. It can be obtained, for example, by production complexes, innovation centers, social institutions, transport, sports, business and other facilities. For their construction, land plots are leased without bidding.

    “Large-scale investment projects are one of the most popular measures to support industrial construction. Since 2022, in accordance with the order of Sergei Sobyanin, the city provides land plots at a preferential rental rate of one ruble per year. Thus, in May 2024, an investor was allocated more than 0.9 hectares for the construction of an industrial technology park with an area of over 13 thousand square meters in the Lyublino district,” said the Deputy Mayor of Moscow for Transport and Industry

    Maxim Liksutov.

    The implementation of the MaIP allows for the creation of jobs for city residents and contributes to the development of the capital’s infrastructure.

    As the Minister of the Moscow Government, head of the capital’s Department of City Property added Maxim Gaman, almost 0.5 hectares of land has been allocated near the Tekstilshchiki metro station for the construction of a shopping and entertainment center (SEC). Its area will be up to 7.9 thousand square meters. It can accommodate offices, shops, a cinema, cafes, restaurants and other facilities. The new SEC will become another attractive place for residents of the area.

    Earlier Sergei Sobyanin told, that for the implementation of MAIP, about 220 hectares of land have been provided to investors since the beginning of the year. This is almost twice as much as for the same period in 2023.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    https://vvv.mos.ru/nevs/item/145590073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: The capital’s courtyards were improved taking into account the wishes of city residents

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    The specialists of the city economy complex have improved about 1.7 thousand courtyards. This was reported by the Deputy Mayor of Moscow for Housing and Public Utilities and Improvement Petr Biryukov.

    “This year, 1.7 thousand courtyards were put in order, the asphalt covering of pedestrian paths and driveways was renewed, and parking lots were arranged. An important final stage of improvement is landscaping; lawns and flower beds were laid out during the work,” said Pyotr Biryukov.

    All improvement projects were developed taking into account the suggestions and wishes of city residents. Thus, small architectural forms are changed or installed, and residents can take part in choosing their design.

    “If there is the necessary space, it is possible to install swings and gazebos. We repair children’s and sports grounds, replace their surfaces and equipment. Particular attention is paid to the modernization of the lighting system – we install lanterns and street lamps with energy-saving lamps,” added Petr Biryukov.

    At the request of residents and if the necessary conditions are available, a place for walking pets can be allocated in the courtyards.

    More than 24 thousand capital courtyards have already been put in order in accordance with the developed standard. It implies equipping them with the necessary infrastructure for recreation and sports, high-quality lighting, and landscaping of territories.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    https://vvv.mos.ru/nevs/item/145616073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: The number of tourists from foreign countries has increased by 70 percent in Moscow

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    More than a million foreign tourists visited Moscow in the first half of 2024. The Russian capital is chosen for business trips, gastronomic discoveries, and vacations with family and friends. The city attracts travelers with its architectural heritage, culture, pedestrian streets and embankments, parks, numerous cafes and restaurants, and a diverse event program.

    “In six months, the tourist flow to Moscow from foreign countries has grown by 70 percent compared to the same period in 2023. The leaders in the number of guests were China, Turkey, India and the countries of the Asia-Pacific region,” she said.

    Natalia Sergunina, Deputy Mayor of Moscow.

    China ranks first in the number of tourists among non-CIS countries — about 190 thousand visits. This is 2.4 times more than in the first two quarters of last year. Turkey is in second place (35.2 thousand trips), and India is in third place (28.5 thousand trips).

    The number of travelers from the Asia-Pacific region and Latin America has doubled — 260.6 thousand and 17.2 thousand people, respectively. There have been more guests from Vietnam: from January to June of this year, Moscow was visited by 16.6 thousand people.

    In addition, Moscow is seeing an increase in business travelers, with 40 percent of them later returning to the capital for family vacations. The city is introducing business travel industry representatives to opportunities to organize large-scale events. For example, in April this year, the Shaping MICE Future conference was held, which brought together over 100 participants from India and Russia. In June, the first BRICS tourism forum was held. It was attended by delegations from Brazil, Egypt, India, Iran, China, the United Arab Emirates, Ethiopia, and the Republic of South Africa.

    In addition, there is an online certification program called Moscow MICE Ambassadors. During the training courses, industry representatives from India can learn about the stages of planning and organizing events in the capital.

    In 2023, the foreign tourist flow to the Russian capital amounted to 2.3 million people. To strengthen international ties, the city participates in major specialized exhibitions, organizes business missions, as well as projects and events aimed at domestic and foreign audiences.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    http://vvv.mos.ru/nevs/item/145593073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Technical center, laboratories and stadium: a large school was built in the Vnukovo area

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    The construction of a comprehensive school has been completed in the Vnukovo district. The investor erected the building as part of a residential complex at 8a Letchika Gritsevtsa Street. This was reported by the Deputy Mayor of Moscow for Urban Development Policy and Construction Vladimir Efimov.

    “In the Vnukovo district of TiNAO, construction of a school with an area of 19.5 thousand square meters has been completed. It is designed for a thousand students. The three-story building includes elementary and secondary school blocks, as well as a sports block. In the future, the school will be transferred to the city education system,” said Vladimir Efimov.

    The building has all the conditions for comfortable learning for young Muscovites. It is equipped with laboratory and research complexes, rooms for musical and artistic creativity, a medical block, psychologist’s and speech therapist’s offices, as well as a dining hall.

    “The building provides for zoning of the educational space with the placement of the elementary school block separately from the premises of the secondary school. The main entrance is located in such a way that the flows of junior and senior classes do not intersect. The interest of students in their studies will be supported by a multi-light multifunctional space on the second floor with a stage, an artistic, technical center, as well as sports halls and a media library,” added the Minister of the Government of Moscow, Head of the Department of Urban Development Policy of the City of Moscow

    Vladislav Ovchinsky.

    The school courtyard has been equipped with areas for ceremonial events and active games, a stadium, recreation areas and outdoor activities.

    The permit for the commissioning of the school was issued by the Moscow State Construction Supervision Authority. As the chairman of the agency noted Anton Slobodchikov, the school was built on a land plot of almost 2.2 hectares. The building has universal and specialized classrooms. The entire construction cycle was supervised by the committee’s inspectors. Since the start of the work, nine inspections have been conducted, and based on the results of the final inspection, a conclusion was drawn up on the compliance of the facility with the design documentation, after which the school was put into operation.

    All schools and kindergartens being built in TiNAO fully comply with the quality and equipment standards applicable to educational institutions in the capital. According to the head of the Department for the Development of New Territories of the City of Moscow Vladimir Zhidkin, designers are faced with the task of creating premises that are not only convenient for the educational process, but also adapted for scientific and creative activities, and the comprehensive development of students. The emphasis is on modern technical equipment, functionality, spaciousness, and safety. Since the beginning of 2024, more than 20 educational facilities have already been built and opened in TiNAO.

    Earlier Sergei Sobyanin reported, that since the beginning of 2024, 63 social facilities have been built in Moscow.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    http://vvv.mos.ru/nevs/item/145589073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Developers can apply for residency in Russia’s first video game and animation cluster

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Moscow Government – Government of Moscow –

    Until November 30, Moscow animation studios and video game development companies will be able to apply for residency in Russia’s first video game and animation cluster. Agreements will be concluded after the second stage of selection in the first half of 2025. This was reported by the Minister of the Moscow Government, head of the Moscow Department of Culture Alexey Fursin.

    “We are announcing the start of the first stage of accepting applications for residency in the first video game and animation cluster in Russia. The participant status will provide an opportunity to place a company office on the territory of the cluster and, using the provided equipment, create new video game and animation products of any complexity. Working in such conditions will help individual specialists and companies develop their projects and the Russian gaming industry,” noted Alexey Fursin.

    Earlier, more than 40 companies expressed their desire to become residents of the cluster. This status will make it possible to place an office of no more than 500 square meters on its territory, as well as use modern infrastructure and advanced equipment that allows creating video game and animation products of any complexity.

    You can submit an application on the website Creative Industries Agencies (CIA)At the beginning of 2025, the expert council will hold a second round of selection and determine the companies that will receive residency.

    Candidates must have the status of an individual entrepreneur or a legal entity registered in Moscow. In addition, they must have at least one completed video game or animation product in their professional portfolio, as well as another project in the development stage.

    The country’s first video game and animation cluster will be located in the Stratos business center on Nikola Tesla Street. The operator is the Agency for Creative Industries. The cluster will cover about 40,000 square meters. In addition to office space, coworking, and exhibition halls, Stratos will house technological infrastructure for creating video games and animation.

    With the help of a motion capture studio, it will be possible to create realistic characters: record the movements of actors or animals and transform them into high-quality digital images or animation.

    The recording studio will record background sounds, music and soundtracks for video games and animated films, as well as voice their characters.

    A cinema hall with high-resolution screens is provided for viewing and adjusting finished materials. They will provide the precise color rendering necessary for working on videos. A technically equipped lecture hall with a modular system is provided for holding lectures, training sessions and other events.

    The conference hall and exhibition area will host business and creative events, exhibitions and presentations. Companies will be able to demonstrate their developments to visitors. There are several meeting rooms in the cluster for business meetings.

    The residents of the cluster will be beginning and experienced Russian development companies and animation studios. The platform will cover all areas of the industry – from training to support for Moscow specialists in export activities. Residents will have access to professional high-tech equipment, as well as participate in international exhibitions, accelerators, lectures and master classes.

    The cluster is expected to become a center of attraction for talented developers from all over the country and open up new opportunities for the development of the creative industry. The support measures provided by the city will help to consolidate Moscow’s position among the leaders in the field of video game and animation creation.

    Since 2023, the Moscow Agency for Creative Industries has been actively supporting the video game industry. This year, the Moscow Agency for Creative Industries launched the Video Game Factory accelerator, whose participants refine their ideas and then present them to investors. The most successful of them are distributed on the largest gaming platforms in Russia and the world. The first stream has already ended with the creation of 20 unique projects, and there are two more streams ahead.

    Over 25 projects and cooperation with 70 countries: results of 2023 in the creative industries

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    https://vvv.mos.ru/nevs/item/145603073/

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: The delegation of SPbGASU took part in the program “Voice of the generation. Vice-rectors teachers”

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering – Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering – The SPbGASU team exchanges experience with colleagues from other universities

    From October 12 to 15, the fourth stream of the program “Voice of the Generation. Vice-Rectors and Teachers” was held in Pyatigorsk at the Mashuk Knowledge Center. Representatives of our university took part in the program: Vice-Rector for Youth Policy Marina Malyutina, Deputy Deans for Educational Work Anna Tsarenko (Faculty of Civil Engineering), Daria Kulakova (Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Urban Management), Daria Boytsova (Faculty of Architecture), and curators of academic groups Sergey Lanko and Mikhail Timokhin.

    “Voice of the Generation. Vice-Rectors and Teachers” is an educational project of the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs with the support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.

    The goal of the program is to provide information on current trends in youth policy, methods of working with students, and to improve the skills of specialists involved in educational work at universities.

    In her welcoming speech to the participants of the program, Deputy Minister of Science and Higher Education of Russia Olga Petrova emphasized that one of the main tasks in educating young people and forming healthy life values in them is to involve students in active social life, starting from university.

    Advisor to the head of the Federal Agency for Youth Affairs Madeleine Baturina emphasized the need to form a unified system for raising children and young people by involving them in special projects of the “Youth of Russia” platform within the framework of the national project “Youth and Children”.

    The four days of the programme were very intense: they included lectures by experts in the field of educational work and youth policy, business games and immersion games with subsequent reflection, a quiz and an immersive performance.

    The program topics were:

    education and law; mentoring in education; the influence of the student’s personal position on strengthening traditional Russian values; educational environment; the teacher is the strategic capital of the state.

    Particular attention was paid to the structure and content of university educational programs, methods that allow developing not a formal document, but an effective strategy for working with young people.

    In addition to getting acquainted with the current content of youth policy and modern approaches to it, representatives of SPbGASU exchanged experiences with colleagues from other universities.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Global: On Ukraine, candidate Trump touts his role as dealmaker while Harris sticks with unwavering support

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Lena Surzhko Harned, Associate Teaching Professor of Political Science, Penn State

    Continued support from the White House for Ukraine could hinge on the presidential election. AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta

    The U.S. presidential election isn’t drawing eyes only at home – Moscow and Kyiv are watching closely, too.

    Regardless of who wins in November, there will be significant implications for Ukraine as it continues to resist Russia in a war heading toward a fourth year.

    Washington’s continued support is seen by some as no less than an existential issue for Ukraine. Without U.S. arms and aid, it is unlikely that the nation would be able to continue repelling its larger, better-armed neighbor.

    During the presidential debate on Sept. 10, 2024, Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris and Republican contender Donald Trump had a chance to clarify their positions on Ukraine. Trump evaded ABC moderator David Muir’s question regarding the importance of Ukraine’s victory over Russia, twice. Instead, he repeated his long-standing line that he would achieve a negotiated peace quickly – even before taking office as president.

    At the same debate, Harris dismissed the idea of Trump negotiating with “a dictator who would eat you for lunch.” She instead emphasized the Biden policy to support Ukraine “as long as it takes” in concert with U.S. allies.

    But detail has been light on what either candidate would actually do to support Ukraine and end the war. So, what do we know about each candidate’s approach to Ukraine based on their records?

    Trump: A ‘very fair and rapid deal’?

    Since the start of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Trump has repeatedly stated that ending the war is in the U.S.’s best interests and that he can end the war quickly. In fact, Trump is certain that had he remained president after the 2020 election, Russian President Vladimir Putin would not have invaded – an unsubstantiated claim he repeated during the Sept. 10 presidential debate.

    Trump has often reiterated that both Putin and Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy respect him, and he would be able to use his “good relationship” with both to bring them to the negotiating table and end the war.

    Yet, Trump’s record on his relationships with Zelenskyy and Putin is rather complicated.

    Trump’s admiration for Putin is well documented and dates back to his first presidential run in 2016, sparking numerous investigations and reports of collusion. Most recently, Bob Woodward reported that Trump secretly sent COVID-19 tests to Putin in the midst of a pandemic shortage, a claim confirmed by the Kremlin.

    Trump’s relationship with Zelenskyy is similarly laden with baggage. A 2019 phone call between the two men, during which Trump pressured Ukraine’s president to open a criminal investigation into Joe Biden, led to Trump’s impeachment. In exchange, Ukraine would have received continued U.S. support for the country’s defense against Russia, which had been waging a proxy war in eastern regions of Ukraine since 2014. During the subsequent hearings in Congress, one of Trump’s aids testified that “Trump did not give a sh*t about Ukraine” and was only interested in his own political gains.

    Standing next to Zelenskyy during a meeting at the Trump Tower on Sept. 27, 2024 – their first meeting since Sept. 25, 2019 – Trump said he was sure that both Zelenskyy and Putin are interested in peace and that a “very fair” and “rapid” deal is possible.

    When asked what that deal might entail, Trump responded that it’s “too early” to discuss details and that both he and Zelenskyy have “their own ideas.”

    While the Republican candidate has not been explicit on the details of negotiations or possible conditions, some of his proxies have voiced proposals. Trump’s vice presidential pick, JD Vance, has laid out a plan that includes potential land concessions on the part of Ukraine and the creation of a demilitarized zone along the battle lines of the Russian-occupied territory of eastern Ukraine.

    Meanwhile, Trump’s son Donald Jr. co-authored a piece with former presidential candidate turned Trump ally Robert F Kennedy Jr., arguing that a concession to Russian demands for “Ukrainian neutrality and a halt to NATO’s eastward expansion” were reasonable to avoid a nuclear game of chicken. Although these have not been echoed in Trump’s own statements on Ukraine, both men have the ear of the Republican candidate.

    These plans have been criticized as closely resembling those of the Kremlin. Prior to meeting with Trump in New York, Zelenskyy had also criticized Vance’s plan and expressed doubts that Trump and his team really know how to end the war.

    Harris: ‘Strategic interest, not charity’

    Harris has been harshly critical of Trump’s approach to Ukraine. “They are not proposals for peace,” Harris said in response to suggestions that Ukraine cede territory for peace. “Instead they are proposals for surrender,” she added.

    Such views are in line with Harris’ record. As part of the Biden administration, Harris has given vocal support to Ukraine’s fight for political sovereignty and territorial integrity.

    At the onset of the full-scale invasion in early 2022, Harris traveled to Europe to help shore up a coalition of European allies to support Ukraine.

    As vice president, Harris has repeatedly condemned Russian war crimes in Ukraine. In February 2023, while attending the annual Munich Security Conference in Germany, she announced that the U.S. has determined that Russian actions in Ukraine amounted to “crimes against humanity,” affirming U.S. commitment to the international rule of law.

    Along with continued support, the U.S. has provided substantial aid for Ukraine, totaling US$61.3 billion in military aid since the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022.

    The Biden administration also has said that rising costs and keeping pressure on Russia through sanctions are important mechanisms to keep Moscow accountable. Harris reiterated this need to maintain sanctions and broad coalition support for Ukraine at the Munich Security Conference in February 2024 and again in June at the peace summit organized by Ukraine in Switzerland.

    As a presidential candidate, Harris has openly signaled her commitment to supporting Kyiv – not only for Ukraine survival but for the collective security of NATO allies and the U.S. itself. Harris emphasized this point in the September debate, suggesting that Ukraine was not Putin’s final stop and that he has “his eyes on the rest of Europe, starting with Poland.”

    Standing next to Zelenskyy in Washington on Sept. 26, 2024, Harris reiterated the point: “The United States supports Ukraine not out of charity, but because it’s in our strategic interest.”

    Yet, White House policy on Ukraine has been criticized for being slow and hesitant in supplying weaponry. The U.S. has imposed rules on the use of heavy weaponry against targets inside Russia. Furthermore, the U.S. has so far been reticent on Ukraine’s invitation to join NATO, which is seen as crucial for any lasting peace in Kyiv. How Harris’ White House would differ from Biden’s on these issues is not clear.

    Beyond the candidates

    Since the start of the full-scale invasion in 2022, the U.S. Congress has passed five bills that provide aid to Ukraine, totaling US$175 billion.

    However, a six-month delay in aid in early 2024 highlighted growing partisan tension in Congress over continued aid to Ukraine.

    The composition of Congress after the November election is another unknown factor in Washington’s support for Ukraine. Zelenskyy met with congressional leaders during his visit to the U.S. in September, but notably absent was Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson, who in the past has shown reluctance to support continued funding.

    For the large part, support for Ukraine remains bipartisan in Congress and among American voters. Yet there is a risk the election could further politicize the issue. And the outcome of November’s vote could determine whether U.S. efforts going forward focus more on pushing for a negotiated deal or on-going support for Ukraine.

    Lena Surzhko Harned does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. On Ukraine, candidate Trump touts his role as dealmaker while Harris sticks with unwavering support – https://theconversation.com/on-ukraine-candidate-trump-touts-his-role-as-dealmaker-while-harris-sticks-with-unwavering-support-237534

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Rosneft and the Ministry of Tourism of the Samara Oblast Present the “Zhiguli Weekend” Motor Tourist Route

    Source: Rosneft

    Headline: Rosneft and the Ministry of Tourism of the Samara Oblast Present the “Zhiguli Weekend” Motor Tourist Route

    Rosneft and the Ministry of Tourism of the Samara Oblast presented the “Zhiguli Weekend” motor tourist route, which runs along the region’s landmark and most picturesque locations.

    Rosneft is committed to the development of domestic automobile tourism and aims to create comfortable conditions for car travellers. One of Rosneft’s key objectives is to enhance the quality of its roadside assistance and customer service at its filling stations.

    The route presentation was held at a Rosneft filling station in Samara. Egor Okhotnikov, a notable navigator of LADA Sport ROSNEFT racing team, took part in the event.

    The tourist route “Zhiguli Weekend” runs through Samara, Togliatti, Syzran and unique landscapes and locations of the region. Tourists can efficiently use their travel time and immerse themselves in the atmosphere of the Volga region thanks to well-designed logistics. Rosneft filling station app makes it easy to find the nearest filling station along the route.

    In the historic city of Syzran, guests will be introduced to the region’s only Kremlin. It was built in 1683 and is recognized as an object of national cultural heritage.

    In the “Russia’s car capital” Togliatti tourists will be able to visit the AVTOVAZ museum, as well as the production site of LADA Sport ROSNEFT, the leading team in Russian circuit racing, whose title sponsor for many years is Rosneft.

    Samara, the capital of the region, will surprise travelers with the longest five-kilometer waterfront. From any point of the waterfront there is a breathtaking panoramic view of the Volga River. In the historical part of the city visitors will be welcomed by the museum-appartment of the author of “The Golden Key” Alexei Tolstoy, an art museum and a unique underground structure – Stalin’s bunker, 37 metres deep.

    Along the way, motor tourists can visit other cultural sights of the region: the old village Shiryaevo, where Ilya Repin wrote sketches for the painting “Barge Haulers on the Volga”, a Gothic castle on the shore of the Zhiguli Sea (Kuybyshev Reservoir) and much more.

    The route also includes unique natural monuments: Samarskaya Luka National Park and Zhiguli Nature Reserve. This year the Samarskaya Luka National Park celebrates its 40th anniversary. Rosneft’s Samara Enterprises have been supporting the national park’s projects for 13 years, the most significant of which is the study and preservation of the population of the Red Book white-tailed eagle.

    Samara Oblast is one of Rosneft’s strategic regions of operation. The Company is present in the region with a powerful full-cycle production complex, including scientific and project support, oil and gas production, oil and gas processing, oil refining, production of lubricants, additives and catalysts, as well as a retail network. Large enterprises such as Samaraneftegaz, Kuibyshev Refinery, Novokuibyshevsk Refinery, Syzran Refinery, Novokuibyshevsk Oil and Additives Plant, Novokuibyshevsk Petrochemical Company, and Samaranefteprodukt operate in Samara Oblast.

    Rosneft’s network of filling stations is the largest in the region, covering all major highways in key tourist destinations, including the M-5 highway, as well as highways leading to neighboring regions: the Republics of Tatarstan and Bashkortostan, Ulyanovsk, Saratov and Orenburg Oblasts. In the Samara Oblast there are 77 stations of the company, where you can fuel your car with high-quality fuel, have a comfortable rest in a cafe or buy goods you need on the road.

    Rosneft filling stations with well-developed infrastructure will help to make traveling along the “Zhiguli Weekend” route as comfortable as possible.

    Reference:

    Rosneft’s retail network is the largest in the Russian Federation in terms of geographical coverage and number of stations, and the Rosneft filling station brand is one of the leaders in Russia in terms of recognition and fuel quality. The retail chain of the Company covers 61 Russian regions. The Company has a network of approximately 3,000 operating filling stations. In addition to high-quality fuel, the Company offers its customers a wide range of goods and services – from shops and cafes to roadside assistance.

    Earlier, Rosneft signed memorandums on cooperation in the development of domestic tourism with the Moscow City Tourism Committee, the Krasnoyarsk and Altai Territories, the Republic of Bashkortostan, the Republic of Udmurtia, and the Arkhangelsk, Samara, Voronezh and Ulyanovsk Regions, and the Stavropol Krai.

    In 2023, Rosneft launched a special information and service platform “Russian Horizons: Come With Us!”. The special project allows car tourists to choose and plan routes to places of interest using the infrastructure of Rosneft’s network of motorway services and filling stations.

    Rosneft
    Information Division
    August 21, 2024

    Keywords: Social News 2024

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI Russia: HSE Graduate School of Economics Wins ESG Excellence Award

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: State University Higher School of Economics – State University Higher School of Economics –

    ESG Excellence Award is an annual award for achievements in the field of sustainable development and ESG that have significant social effects. Among the laureates and nominees of the award are the largest Russian companies – leaders of the ESG agenda, as well as companies and organizations that have made a tangible contribution to the sustainable development of the Russian economy and society.

    The HSE project to prepare globally competitive and socially responsible business leaders for the digital economy, possessing professional competencies in the field of sustainable development and ESG, received well-deserved recognition from the jury of the award. The project is being implemented jointly by representatives of the academic, professional and business communities, in particular, at the international level the partners are PRME, NBS Sustainability Centres Community; at the national level – the National ESG Alliance, SBER, the Agency for Strategic Initiatives, the Bank of Russia, Polyus, Norilsk Nickel, RUSAL, SIBUR, Rosatom, X5 Group, KEPT, E Change, YouSocial and other representatives of Russian business.

    The main objectives of the project are:

    Creation of innovative academic disciplines covering the main aspects of sustainable development, ESG and digital technologies, and development of a modern educational and methodological complex with a focus on problem-based learning; Implementation of project-based learning through the implementation of applied projects from customers from the professional and business community, organization of internships and practices in companies integrating the principles of sustainable development and ESG into their activities; Development of a culture of responsible behavior and management within the HSB to develop leadership qualities and management skills of students and graduates aimed at cultural and social change; Conducting applied scientific research in the field of sustainable development and ESG, contributing to the identification of best practices and new approaches with the involvement of students and graduates.

    We congratulate our colleagues on their victory and wish them further success!

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Report calls for urgent action to reverse soil degradation in Europe

    Source: European Union 2

    Launched today at the EU Soil Observatory Stakeholder Forum, the 2024 State of Soils in Europe report assesses the state of soil degradation across the EU and other countries in the European Economic Area, including Ukraine, Türkiye, and the Western Balkans. The report shows alarming status and trends, with soil degradation getting much worse in recent years, and highlights the need for immediate action to reverse this trend. 

    For example, overall soil erosion is estimated to amount to 1 billion tonnes per year across the EU. At present date, approximately a quarter (24%) of EU soils are affected by water erosion, mainly in cropland, with projections referring to a possible increase of 13-25% by 2050. Unsustainable water erosion affects about a third (32%) of agricultural land. The mechanical agitation of soil, a common practice in agriculture, can also initiate soil degradation. This phenomenon, called tillage erosion, can have a significant impact on cultivated fields. Other forms of erosion include wind erosion and crop harvesting, among others.

    Nutrient imbalancesare also on the rise: they are now estimated to affect 74% of agricultural land. These changes to the composition of soil can have negative consequences. For example, nitrogen surplus is increasing and can be harmful to human health, crops, eco-systems, and the climate. Meanwhile, soil organic carbon, which is essential to keeping soil healthy, is decreasing in agricultural areas. An estimated 70 million tonnes of this organic carbon were lost from the mineral soils of croplands across the EU and UK between 2009 and 2018.

    The degradation of peatlands is also concerning. These wetlands are essential carbon sinks: they absorb greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and store them, contributing to mitigate climate change. When they deteriorate, peatlands can release those gases back into the atmosphere. In the EU, peatland drainage is responsible for around 5% of total greenhouse gas emissions. 50% of peatlands in the EU are now estimated to be degraded, many of which have been irreparably damaged.

    Outside the EU, the situation is similarly dire – particularly in Ukraine, where military activities have caused severe soil destruction. Over 10 million of Ukraine’s 60 million hectares of land are estimated to be degraded because of Russia’s invasion. Recovery from this damage could take decades or even centuries. In Türkiye, approximately 1.5 million hectares of land have salinity issues, which can impact both agricultural productivity and ecosystem health. The Western Balkans have reported over 100 identified contaminated or potentially contaminated sites due to mining and industrial activities, although the true extent of soil pollution in these areas remains unknown.

    The importance of soil monitoring and new legislation

    The State of Soils in Europe report is a collaboration between the Joint Research Centre and the European Environment Agency. It sets out the scale of the problem facing Europe today, but it also aims to reinforce and build capacities among the soil research community, while enhancing the engagement of soil users and society.

    The EU Soil Observatory (EUSO) has already laid the foundation for better soil monitoring, using advanced tools to improve the quality of data on soil erosion, soil organic carbon levels, and nutrient imbalances. Together with other collaborations and soil monitoring networks, EUSO is also giving a clearer understanding of how agricultural practices and climate change are impacting Europe’s soils.

    The EU Soil Monitoring Law aims to ensure that soil degradation is assessed more accurately by creating a monitoring framework, to promote sustainable soil management and to identify potentially contaminated sites. It will standardise data collection across EU member states, ensuring that the insights gathered by EUSO and initiatives like the Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey (LUCAS-Soil) are implemented effectively.

    As part of the common agricultural policy (CAP), the sustainable use of agricultural soils is already supported through the CAP Strategic Plans in all Member States by a mix of mandatory and voluntary measures for farmers. For the period 2023-2027, 47% of the European farmland (compared to 15% in the past) will receive support for actions aimed at improving soils or avoiding soil degradation, including by water erosion. 

    The EU Mission ‘A Soil Deal for Europe’ is a large-scale applied R&D funding programme that supports the EU soil strategy, the upcoming Soil Monitoring Law, and the CAP. The Mission funds actions to establish harmonised soil health monitoring in the EU; to develop and promote the adoption of sustainable soil management practices and technologies to restore soil health; and to provide advice and education on soil health to managers and citizens. The Mission has invested €435 million so far and has created the first of a network of 100 living labs, with more than 1000 testing sites across a wide range of land-use sectors (agriculture, forestry, industry, urban and regional planning) across Europe. The Mission currently encompasses 50 projects, which are contributing to increase and improve the knowledge of the state of soils in the EU.  

    Protecting our soils: a shared responsibility

    Tackling soil degradation is vital for achieving the EU’s environmental, agricultural, and climate goals. The numbers are clear: soil degradation has worsened significantly in the last decade, but with collective action, enhanced monitoring, and legislative support, the EU can restore this vital resource and ensure a sustainable future for generations to come.

    Background:

    The EUSO Stakeholder Forum serves as the platform for the formal presentation of the 2024 report, bringing together experts, policymakers, and stakeholders from across Europe. Discussions focus on future strategies for reversing soil degradation trends, with particular attention to the upcoming soil legislation and how it facilitates more comprehensive restoration efforts across the continent. With the EU Soil Strategy, the EU Soil Mission, and the Soil Monitoring Law on the horizon, the EU is positioning itself to implement coordinated actions that could dramatically improve soil health in the coming years.

    Related links

    JRC report: The state of soils in Europe

    Article in Nature: Policy implications of multiple concurrent soil erosion processes in European farmland

    European Soil Data Centre (ESDAC)

    EUSO Stakeholders Forum

    Land Use and Coverage Area frame Survey (LUCAS) project

    Soil health

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Remarks in Kyiv by Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III on Ukraine’s Fight for Freedom (As Delivered)

    Source: United States Department of Defense

    Well, good afternoon.

    Thanks for welcoming me back to Kyiv, and to this proud academy.

    Director Nadolenko, I’m very grateful for those generous words.

    And speaking of outstanding diplomats: All Americans should be proud of our tireless and fearless ambassador, Bridget Brink. Ambassador, thanks for doing tremendous work.

    [Applause]

    Let me also thank my good friend, Minister Umerov. Rustem, thanks for that very kind introduction and for your tremendous service to your country.

    Ladies and gentlemen, it’s a great honor to be here with you today.

    I’d like to talk today about Ukraine’s just war of self-defense, and the road ahead.

    And I’d like to start by echoing the words of President Kennedy in his historic 1963 speech in Berlin.

    There are some who say that they don’t understand — or say they don’t understand — what is at stake between the free world and an aggressive tyrant like Putin.

    And I say to them: Let them come to Kyiv.

    There are some who say that both sides are to blame for Putin’s war of aggression.

    Let them come to Kyiv.

    There are some who blur the lines between aggressor and victim.

    Let them come to Kyiv.

    There are some who deny that the Kremlin targets Ukrainian civilians.

    Let them come to Kyiv.

    There are some who say that Ukraine isn’t a real nation.

    Let them come to Kyiv.

    And finally, there are some who claim that Ukraine lacks the courage to prevail.

    Let them come to Kyiv.

    Ladies and gentlemen, let us never forget how this war began.

    For years, Putin had harassed and assaulted the independent nation-state of Ukraine. On February 24, 2022, Putin crossed the line into an all-out invasion. And the Kremlin started the largest war in Europe since World War II.

    Now, Putin’s war of choice poses fundamental questions to every government and every person who seeks a decent and secure world.

    And so I ask today: Do rules matter?

    Do rights matter?

    Does sovereignty matter?

    I believe that they do.

    President Biden believes that they do.

    And every free citizen of Ukraine believes that they do.

    When the largest military in Europe becomes a force of aggression, the whole continent feels the shock.

    When a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council tries to deny self-rule to more than 40 million people, the whole world feels the blow.

    And when a dictator puts his imperial fantasies ahead of the rights of a free people, the whole international system feels the outrage.

    And so that’s why nations of goodwill from every corner of the planet have seen and have risen to Ukraine’s defense. And that’s why the United States and our allies and partners have proudly become the arsenal of Ukrainian democracy.

    America’s values call us to stand by a peaceful democracy fighting for its life. And America’s security demands that we stand up to Putin’s aggression.

    America’s security demands that we stand up to Putin’s aggression.

    Ukraine matters to U.S. security for four blunt reasons.

    Putin’s war threatens European security.

    Putin’s war challenges our NATO allies.

    Putin’s war attacks our shared values.

    And Putin’s war is a frontal assault on the rules-based international order that keeps us all safe.

    Now, this invasion hasn’t gone the way that the Kremlin planned. After 970 days of war, Putin has not achieved one single strategic objective.

    Not one.

    President Zelenskyy didn’t flee. Kyiv didn’t fall. And Ukraine didn’t fold.

    Instead, Russia has paid a staggering price for Putin’s imperial folly.

    Russian forces have suffered hundreds of thousands of casualties since February 2022. According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Russian losses in just the first year of Putin’s war were more than Moscow’s losses in all of its conflicts since World War II—combined.

    And Russia has had to dig so deep into its Soviet stockpiles that it’s attacking Ukraine with tanks from the time of World War II.

    And Russia has squandered more than 200 billion dollars to sustain its invasion. And Russia has given up untold billions of dollars more in previously anticipated economic growth.

    Now, Ukraine has suffered terribly at Putin’s hands.

    Since February 2022, according to the U.N., Russian forces have killed more than 11,000 Ukrainian civilians in verified civilian casualty incidents. And that includes more than 600 children.

    The U.N. says that Putin’s forces have bombed more than 250 Ukrainian schools and hospitals. And they’ve wrecked treasured sites of Ukrainian history, culture, and memory.

    But the Kremlin’s malice has not broken Ukraine’s spirit. Ukraine stands unbowed — and strengthened.

    You know, your fight began with soldiers setting tank ambushes on the streets of Kyiv, and with ordinary citizens making Molotov cocktails to defend their homes.

    And it continues today with a battle-tested Ukrainian military and security forces — and a roaring Ukrainian defense industrial base.

    Ukrainian factories are now pumping out some of the best UAVs in the world, and experienced Ukrainian air defenders are protecting their forces and their families. 

    And your soldiers have shown incredible skill. Your frontline defenders have shown heroic resolve. And your citizens have shown stunning courage.

    Ukraine’s resistance is powered by the emergency workers who rush to the scene; and by the energy workers who race to fix the damage of the Kremlin’s attacks; by the doctors who risk their own lives to save the wounded; by the nurses who provide comfort in hours of anguish; and by the clergy who tend to suffering souls; by the teachers who keep Ukraine’s schools open; and by the parents and grandparents who fight every day to keep their children safe and give them a future of peace.

    So your admirers around the world are studying the Ukrainian way of resistance. And we strongly encourage the reforms that Ukraine has launched to help realize its people’s hopes of joining the European Union and NATO. 

    Ukraine’s defenders have brought inspiration to the world — and glory to Ukraine.

    Slava Ukraini!

    [Audience responds in Ukrainian]

    Yet this struggle imposes obligations on us all. As President Biden told the U.N. General Assembly in September, “Our test is to make sure that the forces holding us together are stronger than the forces that are pulling us apart.”

    And make no mistake. The outcome of Ukraine’s fight for freedom will help set the trajectory for global security in the 21st century.

    Europe’s future is on the line.

    NATO’s strength is on the line.

    And America’s security is on the line.

    So the U.S. government has moved with urgency and purpose. And we’ve seen the huge progress that principled diplomacy can produce —the kind of diplomacy taught right here in this academy.

    Since April 2022, I have been convening the Ukraine Defense Contact Group — the coalition of some 50 countries from around the world determined to help Ukraine fight Putin’s aggression. The Contact Group has met 24 times now.

    And I know that Minister Umerov and my other Ukrainian friends often refer to the Contact Group as “the Ramstein format”— after Ramstein Air Base, where the Contact Group was forged.

    And each time that I’m back at Ramstein, I find it moving to look around that long table; to see in human form the global indignation over Putin’s crimes; and to see determined defense leaders from around the world — from Argentina to Australia, and from Tunisia to Türkiye.

    And it has worked.

    America’s allies and partners are sharing the burden of our shared security.

    And that’s the power of Ramstein.

    You know, as a percentage of GDP, a dozen U.S. allies and partners now provide more security assistance to Ukraine than the United States does. And members of the Contact Group have provided more than [51] billion dollars in direct security assistance to Ukraine.

    And I am proud to remind you that the United States is doing our part as well.

    My country has committed more than 58 billion dollars in security assistance for Ukraine since February 2022. We’ve delivered two Patriot batteries and dozens of other air-defense systems. We’ve provided 24 HIMARS [rocket] systems, and thousands of armored vehicles and drones, and millions of rounds of artillery and other critical munitions.

    Now, that is a very real financial commitment. But for anyone who thinks that American leadership is expensive — well, consider the price of American retreat.

    In the face of aggression, the price of principle is always dwarfed by the cost of capitulation.

    Our allies and partners know that. And I’ve been proud to watch the pro-Ukraine coalition dig deep.

    So just consider Germany, host to Ramstein Air Base. Germany alone has provided or committed to military assistance for Ukraine valued at close to 31 billion dollars.

    And through the Contact Group and its capability coalitions, Ukraine’s friends are now forging an unprecedented, coordinated, 13-country drive to increase industrial production, to meet Ukraine’s battlefield requirements, and to build up the force to deter and repel Russian aggression in the future.

    And so, not since World War II has America systematically rallied so many countries to provide such a range of industrial and military assistance for a partner in need.

    Now, there is no silver bullet. No single capability will turn the tide. No one system will end Putin’s assault.

    What matters is the way that Ukraine fights back. What matters is the combined effects of your military capabilities. And what matters is staying focused on what works.

    Now, I believe that President Biden and Vice President Harris will have a proud place in history for rallying the world to defend Ukraine.

    So will the allies and partners who seek a free Ukraine in a safer world.

    But the proudest place of all will go to the Ukrainian people.

    From President Zelenskyy on down, your leaders chose to fight back. And the people of Ukraine have met Russia’s aggression and atrocities with magnificent defiance.

    The spirit of Ukraine has inspired the world. And it has reminded us all to never take our freedom for granted.

    So we refuse to blame Ukraine for the Kremlin’s aggression.

    We refuse to offer excuses for Putin’s atrocities.

    And we refuse to pretend that appeasement will stop an invasion.

    We fully understand the moral chasm between aggressor and defender.

    And we will not be gulled by the frauds and the falsehoods of the Kremlin’s apologists.

    And we will continue to defend the Ukrainian people’s right to live in security and freedom.

    The Kremlin has forced us into an age where Europe’s largest military invades Europe’s second-largest country. And we dare not believe, as the novelist George Eliot once wrote, that “the giant forces that used to shake the earth are forever laid to sleep.”

    America’s goals remain clear, achievable, and principled. We seek a free and sovereign Ukraine that can defend itself from Russian aggression today — and deter Russian aggression in the future.

    We seek a more secure Europe — and a reinforced commitment from nations of goodwill worldwide to an open international system of rules, rights, and responsibilities.

    I know that the Kremlin’s war is a nightmare from which the Ukrainian people are trying to awake. But we should all understand that Putin’s assault is a warning. It is a sneak preview of a world built by tyrants and thugs — a chaotic, violent world carved into spheres of influence; a world where bullies trample their smaller neighbors; and a world where aggressors force free people to live in fear.

    So we face a hinge in history.

    We can continue to insist that cross-border invasion is the cardinal sin of world politics. And we can continue to stand firm against Putin’s aggression.

    Or we can let Putin have his way. And we can condemn our children and grandchildren to live in a far bloodier and more dangerous world.

    So we must continue to face, to squarely face, the specter of an aggressive Russia — backed by other autocrats from North Korea and Iran.

    If Ukraine falls under Putin’s boot, all of Europe will fall under Putin’s shadow.

    Putin is not just hammering at the norms of the international system built at such a terrible cost by the Allies after World War II. He is shoving us all toward a world where right — where might makes right, and where empire trumps sovereignty. And he is determined to show that his brand of autocracy can outlast the world’s democracies.

    You see, Putin does not just think that his will is stronger. He thinks that his system is better.

    But he could not be more wrong.

    You know, few forces are more powerful than a democracy fighting for freedom.

    As I have said: Peace is not self-executing. Order does not preserve itself. And the principles of freedom, and sovereignty, and human rights do not uphold themselves.

    Yes, there is a price to be paid for human freedom. But it is dwarfed by the price that we would all pay for letting aggression go unchecked.

    So President Biden has chosen the path of mutual responsibility and common security. And we have chosen to share the responsibility of ensuring that Ukraine remains sovereign and free.

    And make no mistake. The United States does not seek war with Russia. And even as Putin makes profoundly reckless and dangerous threats about nuclear war, we will continue to behave with the responsibility that the world rightly demands of a nuclear-armed state.

    So the United States will uphold our sworn NATO obligations.

    The United States will defend every inch of NATO territory.

    And the United States will get Ukraine what it needs to fight for its survival and security.

    [Applause]

    Ladies and gentlemen, let’s be clear.

    Ukraine does not belong to Putin.

    Ukraine belongs to the Ukrainian people.

    And Moscow will never prevail in Ukraine.

    You know, Putin thought that Ukraine would surrender. He was wrong.

    Putin thought that our democracies would cave. He was wrong.

    And Putin thought that the free world would cower. He was wrong.

    And Putin thinks that he will win. He is wrong.

    And as I said in Halifax almost two years ago: free people will always refuse to replace an open order of rules and rights with one dictated by force and fear.

    Now, Ukraine faces complex challenges in the days to come.

    And as then-Vice President Biden said at this academy in 2014, “Democracy is not a destination. Democracy is a road traveled. And it’s a hard damn road to travel.”

    But you have shown the world the moral power of a free people fighting to defend their country.

    That force can bend the arc of history.

    Ladies and gentlemen: never underestimate the strategic advantage of a just cause.

    Never underestimate the resolve of free citizens.

    And never underestimate the power of a democracy summoned to defend itself.

    Ukraine has chosen the course of courage.

    And so have we.

    My friends, you walk a hard road.

    But you do not walk it alone.

    Thank you. God bless you. And may God bless all who fight to defend freedom.

    [Standing ovation]

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: One loan in one hand – the Central Bank of the Russian Federation will take MFIs seriously

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Mainfin Bank –

    How will the Central Bank of the Russian Federation combat Russians’ indebtedness?

    The high level of debt burden of Russians is one of the problems that the regulator has been struggling with for several years, systematically tightening requirements and introducing restrictions for credit institutionsNow the Central Bank of the Russian Federation proposes to establish protective measures for clients MFO:

    the rule of issuing one will apply loan – it will not be possible to draw up a second agreement with an MFI before the first one is executed; the regulator will establish a cooling-off period – three days must pass after the return of one loan and before a new agreement is concluded; the amount of overpayment on microloans will be reduced from 130 to 100% of the original amount.

    “The key goal of the restrictions is to eliminate excessive indebtedness of the population, since most MFI clients have several loans at once, which leads to an increased burden and difficulties in fulfilling obligations,” the expert believes.

    The innovations are planned to be implemented as part of the reform of the industry – the Central Bank of the Russian Federation believes that the development of bills, their adoption and entry into force will take up to three years.

    What innovations await the microfinance organizations market?

    The Bank of Russia not only limits MFI borrowers, but also plans to streamline the microfinance services market – information about the upcoming changes appeared in August 2024. Thus, the regulator wants to divide MFIs into three groups:

    companies operating exclusively in the business segment – with entrepreneurs, legal entities, self-employed citizens; microfinance organizations issuing loans, the cost of which does not exceed 100% per annum; organizations that have received the right to provide loans at a rate exceeding 100%.

    Depending on the group they belong to, the Central Bank will set requirements for the capital of companies – microfinance organizations with increased risks will have to confirm their stability with a sufficient reserve of funds.

    16:30 10/22/2024

    Source:

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    Please note; This information is raw content directly from the information source. It is accurate to what the source is stating and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    http://mainfin.ru/news/one-loan-in-one-hands-the Central Bank of the Russian Federation-will-seriously-take-up-MFO

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Russia: Dmitry Patrushev got acquainted with the progress of construction of plants for energy waste utilization

    Translation. Region: Russian Federation –

    Source: Government of the Russian Federation – An important disclaimer is at the bottom of this article.

    Previous news Next news

    Dmitry Patrushev got acquainted with the progress of construction of the Svistyagino waste energy recycling plant

    During a working visit to the Moscow Region, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Patrushev familiarized himself with the progress of construction work at two waste-to-energy recycling plants – Timokhovo and Svistyagino.

    The construction readiness of the Svistyagino plant is 92%. It is planned to put it into operation this year. The launch dates of the energy waste recycling plants have been repeatedly postponed, and, as the Deputy Prime Minister noted, it is necessary to sort out all the problems preventing their commissioning, and to prevent another change in the deadlines.

    The company “RT-Invest” is implementing projects for the construction of plants for the energy utilization of solid municipal waste.

    “Five enterprises with a total capacity of over 3 million tons are being built in the Moscow Region and the Republic of Tatarstan. The total investment volume is 188 billion rubles. The government provided state support to the projects,” Dmitry Patrushev emphasized.

    Please note: This information is raw content directly from the source of the information. It is exactly what the source states and does not reflect the position of MIL-OSI or its clients.

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Canada: Canada announces new military assistance for Ukraine

    Source: Government of Canada News

    Today, at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Defence Ministers’ meeting in Brussels, the Honourable Bill Blair, Minister of National Defence, announced $64.8 million in military assistance to Ukraine.

    October 18, 2024 – Brussels, Belgium – National Defence / Canadian Armed Forces 

    Today, at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Defence Ministers’ meeting in Brussels, the Honourable Bill Blair, Minister of National Defence, announced $64.8 million in military assistance to Ukraine.

    Ukraine’s need for small arms remains ongoing and is a critical requirement on the battlefield. Today’s announcement commits $27.3 million to procure small arms and ammunition from Canadian industry—building upon more than $120 million in small arms and ammunition that Canada has donated.

    The Minister further announced $20 million to manufacture Canadian-made personal protective equipment and military uniforms for women Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) soldiers, expanding Canada’s pilot project announced in October 2023. This contribution will outfit 30,000 women AFU soldiers with appropriately sized military gear.

    Canada has also committed $5 million towards the Drone Capability Coalition Common Fund. Drones have become critical in this conflict and this Coalition has brought together Ukraine Defense Contact Group (UDCG) members working to find ways to support Ukraine’s drone industry and procure drones that are crucial to Ukraine’s defence efforts.

    In addition, Minister Blair also announced the donation of: 

    • Up to $10.5 million to support Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) activities such as training for Ukrainian Forces; and
    • Up to $2 million to join the IT Capability Coalition and continue Canada’s role in working with Ukraine to strengthen its cyber capabilities. 

    Since the beginning of the conflict, Canada has worked closely with Ukraine and its partners to strengthen Ukraine’s cyber capabilities against Russia’s attacks. Our membership in the IT Coalition will enable us to enhance our ongoing support and leadership in this important space.

    The donations announced today are part of an additional $500 million in military assistance to Ukraine, announced by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau at the NATO Summit in July 2024, including $444 million to support the costs of military equipment, assistance, and training for Ukraine’s Armed Forces.

    • Since February 2022, Canada has committed over $19.5 billion in total assistance to Ukraine, including $4.5 billion in military assistance. This includes Leopard 2 main battle tanks, armoured combat support vehicles, anti-tank weapons, small arms, M777 howitzers and associated ammunition. 

    • Canada is allocating up to $389 million to enhance F-16 pilot training through the Ukraine Defense Contact Group Air Force Capability Coalition. This commitment will support training for pilots in Ukraine’s Armed Forces as well as provide critical equipment to support Ukraine’s safe operation of F-16s.

    • Since the launch of Operation UNIFIER, the CAF has trained more than 42,000 members of the AFU. Canada has announced the extension of this mission until March 2026, so the CAF can continue to respond to Ukraine’s training needs.

    • Canada continues to train AFU members under Operation UNIFIER, with approximately 330 CAF members currently deployed in the United Kingdom, Poland, and Latvia in various roles.

    • These donations are all priorities that Ukraine has stated and have been validated by the Ukraine Defence Contract Group (UDCG) and the International Donor Coordination Centre. They further demonstrate Canada’s strong commitment, along with its Allies, to ensuring Ukraine’s success in its fight against Russia’s unjustifiable war. 

    • Canada is currently a member of the UDCG’s Armour, Air Force, Drone, and IT capability coalitions.

    • The UDCG was created by the United States Secretary of Defense in April 2022 to allow Allies and partners to synchronize donations, consult, and coordinate military assistance to Ukraine, and build up the capabilities of the AFU. The UDCG now comprises more than 50 countries.

    • Since late March 2022, the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF) has been transporting Ukraine-bound military aid donated by Canada, Allies, and partners. To date, the RCAF has transported over 22 million pounds of military donations.

    Simon Lafortune
    Press Secretary and Communications Advisor
    Office of the Minister of National Defence
    Phone: 343-549-0778
    Email: Simon.Lafortune2@forces.gc.ca

    Media Relations
    Department of National Defence
    Phone: 613-904-3333
    Email: mlo-blm@forces.gc.ca

    MIL OSI Canada News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Meet New Director of Judaic Studies, Jessica Cooperman

    Source: US State of Connecticut

    You’re new to UConn. What made you decide to come here?

    I know the previous director, Avinoam Patt, quite well, and it was a big draw that I’ve spoken to him throughout the years and he always raved about UConn. So that made it an appealing position to consider. After years of teaching at a small liberal arts college, I was also drawn to the new challenges and opportunities of working at a large research university.  

    What do you teach and what do you like to teach?

    I teach broadly in the field of Jewish history, and I especially enjoy teaching American Jewish history and American Judaism. In those courses, I try to weave in my own research and interests when possible, which makes it fun. 

     Some Jewish students may take my class thinking, “Oh, this will be familiar to me, right?” But it’s an opportunity for me to show them that there’s much more to learn.   

    Learning about Jewish history introduces students to all kinds of broader debates about migration, race, religion, cultural production, state structures, prejudices, minority rights, and civil rights—topics they might not have thought about in connection to Jewish history. Judaic Studies creates opportunities to learn about Jews and Judaism, but it also leads students to lots of other issues, which we can explore together. I find that really exciting. 

    Could tell us about your research?

    My field is broadly defined as modern Jewish history, but my research is on American Jewish history and American Judaism.  

    My first book focused on soldiers’ services in the First World War. The American military wanted to create a more well-behaved force, to keep soldiers in line, engaged, and out of trouble. The military came up with the idea that soldiers needed to participate in morally uplifting activities—like singing, sports, and educational classes—to be good citizens and good soldiers.  So, they hired the YMCA to provide those services.  

    Instead of protesting about the Protestant YMCA getting this role, the Jewish Welfare Board, a Jewish organization, and the Knights of Columbus, a Catholic fraternal organization, volunteered to be counterparts to the YMCA. In the book, I argue that they ended up changing the government’s conception of religion and the roles of Judaism and Catholicism within these government programs. By the end of World War I, the government perhaps didn’t celebrate, but at least clearly advertised in their propaganda, the partnership among Protestants, Catholics, and Jews in the service of the country.   

    My current research project focuses on the history of Passover in the United States. I’m interested in exploring how both Jewish and non-Jewish communities, particularly Christian ones, have adapted and adopted the holiday and its rituals to express various social, political, and cultural concerns throughout the 20th century.  

    I am also interested in in the history of Jewish-Christian relations in the United States, especially in 20th century projects intended to promote Jewish-Christian dialogue – that is the research project ahead.   

    What are some themes in your field right now?

    I am one of the co-editors of the journal American Jewish History, so I get to read a lot of the newest scholarship in my field. Some of our recent issues have included articles about Sephardic and Mizrachi history in the Americas, Jewish farm collectives, policies on immigration and disability, 19th century religious school curricula, transnational trends in Jewish liturgical music, and Emma Goldman’s love of opera. Because Judaic Studies is an inherently interdisciplinary field, there are always many directions of research – and that is just in the field of American Jewish history. Judaic Studies also includes scholars who study everything from Biblical literature and the ancient world to medieval Jewish mysticism, gender studies, Holocaust studies, Israel studies, contemporary Judaism – and absolutely everything in between. I am not sure that there is any one topic that drives the entire field, but that diversity is part of what makes it dynamic and exciting. 

    Why do you think it’s important for large universities to have a center that focuses on Jews and Judaism?

    I think that higher education has an obligation to serve the public good, and I believe that is particularly true at a public institution. It was part of what drew me to UConn—there is an explicit responsibility to not just teach in an “ivory tower” or a removed academic setting, but to think about how what we teach can be shared with, useful to, and interesting to the public at large.  

    While students are perhaps the first audience we’re speaking to, I think it’s important to consider how a public institution of higher education can serve the public. The Judaic Studies Program and Center for Judaic Studies and Contemporary Jewish Life can offer classes, events, programs, and research projects that help to meet that responsibility.   

    I think people want educational and intellectual opportunities. They want to learn new things and to be introduced to new ideas. And at this moment of ongoing violence in Israel and in Gaza, and growing concern about antisemitism in the United States and around the world, learning about Judaism, Jewish culture, and Jewish history feels particularly relevant.   

    What do students who aren’t majoring in Judaic Studies get from your classes?

    Jews can serve as a lens through which we examine larger social structures and institutions, and you never quite know where that journey will take you. If someone takes a class on Jewish history—like my class on American Jewish history—and they love it and decide to focus on Judaic Studies, that’s fantastic. I very much want to expand the major in and minor in Judaic Studies at UConn. But if students take a class with me and then go on to explore questions about immigration in the United States, or the forces that lead people to migrate from place to place, or any number of other issues that they might encounter in one of my classes then that’s also great.    

    In the humanities, our ultimate object of study is humans and human societies.  So, if my classes can provide both a window into a particular set of human experiences and tools to help students think critically and analytically about the varieties of human experience, and about the different ways that people have made sense of the world and organized their societies over time, then that’s fantastic. 

    Are there any misconceptions about your field?

    The biggest misconception I’ve encountered is that Judaic Studies is only for Jewish students. I’m always happy when someone comes to one of my classes because they have a personal connection to the topic and want to explore it. But just as there’s no expectation that you must be Russian in order to be interested in Russian literature or history, just as an example, you certainly don’t have to be Jewish to be interested Judaism and Judaic Studies.   

    You can want to study something simply because you’re curious. It’s great if you find a personal connection that draws you to a class, but sometimes that connection can be purely intellectual.  Intellectual curiosity is enough—the classes are for anyone who’s interested. 

    In your time here so far, what’s your favorite spot on campus?

    I don’t have a favorite spot yet, but I love how beautiful the campus is, and I am really enjoying watching the fall leaves change color. I have come to bond with the Dodd Center, which is where the Center for Judaic Studies is located. Students and faculty are welcome to come in and say hi!  

    This Q&A is part of CLAS Visionary Voices, a series highlighting the College’s new academic leaders and their innovative visions for education, research, and outreach at UConn.  

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Statement from White  House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on the Visit of Prime Minister Robert Golob of the Republic of  Slovenia

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    On October 22, President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. will host Prime Minister Robert Golob of the Republic of Slovenia for a bilateral meeting at the White House. This will be their first meeting at the White House and follows conversations that helped pave the way for the largest prisoner swap since the Cold War. The leaders will have an in-depth discussion on a range of issues of mutual interest, including energy security and cooperation, a shared approach to the Western Balkans, continued robust support to Ukraine in its defense against Russian aggression, and events in the Middle East. President Biden will underscore our appreciation for Prime Minister Golob’s leadership to bring home Americans unjustly detained by Russia and our continued cooperation on a host of other global issues.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Readout of the Meeting of President Macron of France, Chancellor Scholz of Germany, Prime Minister Starmer of the United Kingdom, and President  Biden of the United  States

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    President Emmanuel Macron of France, Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany, Prime Minister Keir Starmer of the United Kingdom, and President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. of the United States met today in Berlin, Germany.
    The leaders condemned Russia’s continued war of aggression against Ukraine, discussed their plans to provide Ukraine with additional security, economic, and humanitarian assistance – including leveraging the extraordinary revenues of immobilized Russian sovereign assets, as decided at the G7 Summit –, discussed President Zelenskyy’s Victory Plan, and reiterated their resolve to continue supporting Ukraine in its efforts to secure a just and lasting peace, based on international law, including the United Nations Charter, and respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity.
    The leaders also discussed events in the Middle East, in particular the implications of the death of Yahya Sinwar, who bears responsibility for the bloodshed of the October 7th terrorist attack, the immediate necessity to bring the hostages home to their families, ending the war in Gaza, and ensuring humanitarian aid reaches civilians. The leaders also reiterated their condemnation of Iran’s escalatory attack on Israel and coordinated on efforts to hold Iran accountable and prevent further escalation. They discussed the situation in Lebanon and agreed on the need to work towards full implementation of UNSCR 1701 and a diplomatic resolution that allows civilians on both sides of the Blue Line to return safely home.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: PM meeting with President Macron of France, Chancellor Scholz of Germany and President Biden of the United States: 18 October 2024

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    The Prime Minister met President Emmanuel Macron of France, Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany, and President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. of the United States today in Berlin, Germany.

    The Prime Minister met President Emmanuel Macron of France, Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany, and President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. of the United States today in Berlin, Germany.

    The leaders condemned Russia’s continued war of aggression against Ukraine, discussed their plans to provide Ukraine with additional security, economic, and humanitarian assistance, including leveraging the extraordinary revenues of immobilized Russian sovereign assets – as decided at the G7 Summit, discussed President Zelenskyy’s Victory Plan, and reiterated their resolve to continue supporting Ukraine in its efforts to secure a just and lasting peace, based on international law, including the United Nations Charter, and respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity.

    The leaders also discussed events in the Middle East, in particular the implications of the death of Yahya Sinwar, who bears responsibility for the bloodshed of the October 7th terrorist attack, for the immediate necessity to bring the hostages home to their families, for ending the war in Gaza, and ensure humanitarian aid reaches civilians.

    The leaders also reiterated their condemnation of Iran’s escalatory attack on Israel and coordinated on efforts to hold Iran accountable and prevent further escalation. They discussed the situation in Lebanon and agreed on the need to work towards full implementation of UNSCR 1701 and a diplomatic resolution that allows civilians on both sides of the Blue Line to return safely home.

    Updates to this page

    Published 18 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Press release: PM meeting with President Macron of France, Chancellor Scholz of Germany and President Biden of the United States: 18 October 2024

    Source: United Kingdom – Prime Minister’s Office 10 Downing Street

    The Prime Minister met President Emmanuel Macron of France, Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany, and President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. of the United States today in Berlin, Germany.

    The Prime Minister met President Emmanuel Macron of France, Chancellor Olaf Scholz of Germany, and President Joseph R. Biden, Jr. of the United States today in Berlin, Germany.

    The leaders condemned Russia’s continued war of aggression against Ukraine, discussed their plans to provide Ukraine with additional security, economic, and humanitarian assistance, including leveraging the extraordinary revenues of immobilized Russian sovereign assets – as decided at the G7 Summit, discussed President Zelenskyy’s Victory Plan, and reiterated their resolve to continue supporting Ukraine in its efforts to secure a just and lasting peace, based on international law, including the United Nations Charter, and respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity.

    The leaders also discussed events in the Middle East, in particular the implications of the death of Yahya Sinwar, who bears responsibility for the bloodshed of the October 7th terrorist attack, for the immediate necessity to bring the hostages home to their families, for ending the war in Gaza, and ensure humanitarian aid reaches civilians.

    The leaders also reiterated their condemnation of Iran’s escalatory attack on Israel and coordinated on efforts to hold Iran accountable and prevent further escalation. They discussed the situation in Lebanon and agreed on the need to work towards full implementation of UNSCR 1701 and a diplomatic resolution that allows civilians on both sides of the Blue Line to return safely home.

    Updates to this page

    Published 18 October 2024

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senator Wicker to President Biden: Make Final Push for Ukraine Before Leaving Office

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for Mississippi Roger Wicker
    WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Roger Wicker, R-Miss., the highest-ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, is demanding that President Biden exercise his responsibilities as commander-in-chief and give Ukraine the weapons it needs to make a “substantial difference” on the battlefield in the last 90 days of his term.
    Senator Wicker specifically called on the president to provision Ukraine with weaponry at a much faster rate, deliver more vehicles, missiles, drones and counter-drone equipment, and increase defense industrial base cooperation between the United States and Ukraine, among other recommendations. The senator sent these detailed requests, along with more than five others, as a part of a detailed plan to enable Ukrainian success prior to the next presidential term starting.
    These demands follow repeated, unsuccessful engagements with the White House since August. In the letter, Senator Wicker notes that he sent a classified letter to President Biden with suggestions on how to improve the military assistance program for Ukraine, and he later followed up with a September phone call to the president regarding the letter. Senator Wicker has also shared these ideas with senior national security officials but has yet to see them yield any significant results.
    “I am frustrated – and mystified – that your administration has accomplished so little in the last three months regarding the war in Ukraine.  You seem poised to leave the next president a weak hand,” Senator Wicker wrote.
    For two years, Senator Wicker has led Senate Republicans in pushing President Biden to implement a more effective strategy for Ukrainian victory. In September, Senator Wicker criticized President Biden’s intention to drag out his use of Presidential Drawdown Authority. Senator Wicker has also repeatedly published a detailed timeline of many instances when President Biden failed to deliver support to Ukraine at a speed where they could make a difference on the battlefield. In a 2023 floor speech, Senator Wicker laid out his first principles as it comes to supporting Ukraine: “more, better, faster.”
    Read the full October 18, 2024 letter here or below.
    October 17, 2024
    President Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
    The White House
    1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
    Washington, D.C. 20500
    Dear Mr. President,
    In early August, I sent you a classified letter, which identified steps you could take to support Ukraine more aggressively. The letter contained detailed recommendations, including policy changes and suggestions to improve military assistance delivery and defense industrial base cooperation. My goal was to highlight ways that your administration could use its remaining six months in office wisely – to put Ukraine in the most advantageous position possible for your successor, whomever the American people choose. I followed up with you in a phone conversation in mid-September, and I have attended meetings with senior national security officials.
     
    I am frustrated – and mystified – that your administration has accomplished so little in the last three months regarding the war in Ukraine. You seem poised to leave the next president a weak hand. Nonetheless, I maintain that a focused effort – directed by you – could make a substantial difference over your final 90 days as president.
    Toward that end, I have included a list of 10 recommendations.
    Recommendation 1: Increase the pace of weapons transfers to Ukraine. The current pace of Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) usage would drag on through calendar year 2025. This is true despite the agreement between Congress and your administration that the authority granted in the National Security Supplemental would last through calendar year 2024. That tempo led your administration to seek a $5.5 billion extension of this authority last month.
    The Secretaries of State and Defense exercised this authority to prevent its expiration, but your administration has said that the pace of deliveries will not change. Ukraine will continue to receive only about $400 million in military equipment per month for the next 14 months.
    I am troubled that your administration is using U.S. military readiness as an excuse to “manage” the conflict in Ukraine. Officials are making decisions about strategic and military risk, but they are not consulting Congress. You should direct the Secretary of Defense to provide you a plan that would deliver the remaining $5.5 billion in Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) to Ukraine immediately.
    Deliver more vehicles. Ukraine needs many more heavy vehicles, such as M1A1 Abrams tanks and Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, to form the core of combined-arms brigades. Ukraine also faces a significant shortfall of general protected vehicles (such as up-armored HMMWVs, ambulances, and MRAPs) to protect troops from Russian drones and artillery. The U.S. Army and Marine Corps possess ample stocks of these vehicles. Our industrial base can easily replace those that are transferred. Additionally, there is no near-term need for massive stockpiles of vehicles given the degraded state of Russian ground forces.
    Deliver more ATACMS. Ukraine has used U.S.-provided ATACMS responsibly and effectively, but it needs more. We have a sufficient inventory of serviceable long-range ATACMS. A significant number of these should go to Ukraine. Although there may be division within your administration on this recommendation, I urge you to push the Army and the combatant commands to aid Ukraine’s largely successful deep strike campaign.
    Deliver more drones and counter unmanned aerial systems. U.S. attack drone and counter-UAS production can increase. The industrial base is expanding rapidly and has multiple solution options in each of these areas. Ukraine is quite receptive to using unproven systems.
    Recommendation 2: Allow greater flexibility on restrictions for U.S.-provided munitions. One of Ukraine’s key asymmetric advantages against Russia is its ability to target high-value Russian military targets and to do so rapidly. Your administration has hamstrung this crucial advantage. You should immediately revise any policies that limit the use of U.S.-provided munitions, including ATACMS, to strike military targets inside Russia. Any restrictions should be placed on the types of targets, rather than on the distance from a border that Russia does not even recognize. Numerous allies and partners already allow their long-range munitions to be used for deep strikes.
    Recommendation 3: Increase the cap of U.S. government non-military personnel allowed in-country. You should direct Secretary Blinken to allow more State Department, Defense Department, and other government agency personnel inside Ukraine. The current number of personnel cannot manage a military aid effort in the tens of billions of dollars while conducting planning for future improvements in the Ukrainian industrial base and economy. As a result, anything beyond the day-to-day management is not getting done. Current staff is overworked, and more U.S. government personnel are required to manage security assistance and to conduct accountability and oversight work. Numerous allies already have a much more risk-tolerant government presence in Ukraine.
    Recommendation 4: Establish a regulated presence of U.S. military contractors inside Ukraine. You should allow a limited number of U.S. military contractors to operate in Ukraine – under strict conditions – to increase Ukraine’s ability to maintain its equipment. The current approach is too slow, as we remotely perform maintenance or move Ukrainian equipment to Poland for up-keep. The presence of U.S. contractors in-country would also help to mentor Ukrainian personnel to increase their self-sufficiency. U.S. contractors are well-prepared to execute such a mission. They have extensive experience in Iraq and Afghanistan. British, French, and Czech personnel are already in-country, or will soon be, to conduct similar missions.
    Recommendation 5: Expand training for Ukrainian land forces. The United States should maximize the use of all available training capacity located in the European Command (EUCOM) area of responsibility, and it should build up Ukrainian brigades capable of combined arms warfare. Currently, improved Ukrainian recruitment is outpacing Ukrainian and allied training. EUCOM almost certainly has the ability to train even more troops per month than it does now, which would help cover the number of troops that Ukraine does not have the capacity to train.
    Recommendation 6: Deliver more shareable, commercially-derived intelligence. The administration should use processes already in place to increase the delivery of available unclassified information to Ukraine, including disposition of Russian forces and location data. The National Reconnaissance Office has contract vehicles in place for commercial satellite services (such as RF data) that are instrumental in providing Ukraine with services for tipping and cueing (i.e., targeting) of Russian radars, air assets, defense systems, and other threats.
    Recommendation 7: Dramatically expand the Pentagon industrial base policy workforce. U.S. industrial base expansion and industrial base integration with Europe is not happening fast enough because we lack the personnel to plan and execute these activities. You should direct the Secretary of Defense, in the next 15 days, to reassign at least 100 capable and motivated DOD civil servants, moving them into these offices and asking Congress for new hiring authorities and supplemental money to pay for this expansion. The short-staffed office that runs the Defense Production Act illustrates the need. Only a handful of people staff that organization, which is tasked with finding ways to rebuild our supplier base for solid rocket motors, missile casings, and more. DOD industrial base offices can also help allies and partners expand their own production, such as the Storm Shadow and SCALP lines in the UK and France, respectively.
    These U.S. offices include:
    Joint Production Acceleration Cell
    Assistant Secretary of Defense for Industrial Base Policy
    Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for International and Industry Engagement
    Manufacturing Capability Expansion and Investment Prioritization (DPA & ICAM/IBAS)
    Recommendation 8: Rapidly accelerate contracting timelines. I understand that many large contracts for Ukraine, especially those funded through the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative, are still taking a year or more on average. This is unacceptable. Section 1244 of the Fiscal Year 2023 NDAA, as well as additional contracting authorities, grant broad flexibilities to the Department of Defense. By written instruction, you should formally direct the Secretary of Defense and the service acquisition executives to require all contracting officers to leverage – to the maximum extent possible – those contracting flexibilities. The Army has used section 1244 for the new 155mm artillery ammunition factory in Mesquite, Texas, and doing so brought it online two years faster than expected.
    Recommendation 9: Hold monthly high-level defense industrial base meetings. You should direct the Secretaries of State, Defense, and Commerce to host monthly high-level defense industrial base meetings with Ukraine, key NATO allies, and defense industry officials. You should prioritize coproduction with Ukraine so it can better meet its own needs.
    Recommendation 10: Deliver more DPICMs. In addition to ATACMS, Ukraine also has used Dual Purpose Improved Conventional Munitions (DPICMs) effectively and responsibly. The U.S. inventory includes hundreds of thousands of serviceable 155mm DPICMs rounds. Each 155mm DPICMs round has the effect of 3–5 high explosive artillery projectiles. You possess the authority to send Ukraine $250 million of DPICMs today. There is simply no way to offset the artillery advantage of the Russians without using DPICMs.
    Sincerely,
    Roger F. Wicker
    Ranking Member

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Video: Gaza: Catastrophic levels of hunger expected to double – Press Conference | United Nations

    Source: United Nations (Video News)

    Press Conference by Volker Turk, United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

    —————————————————-

    The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Volker Türk, told journalists in New York that “the number of people at catastrophic levels of hunger is expected to double in the coming months and the risk of famine persists across the whole of Gaza,” and added that “this crisis is principally the consequences of decisions made by the Israeli authorities.”

    Following the presentation of his annual report to the General Assembly, Türk said, “starvation of civilians as a method of warfare is prohibited under international humanitarian law. It constitutes a war crime. As the occupying power, Israel has the specific obligations an international humanitarian law to bring into Gaza the necessary foodstuffs, medical supplies and other articles, and to facilitate humanitarian relief by all means at its disposal.”

    He said, “there are reports that Israeli forces are preventing humanitarian aid from accessing the north, exacerbating the already desperate humanitarian and medical needs,” adding that Israel’s evacuation orders “appear designed to cut off north Gaza completely from the rest of the territory, as bombing and other attacks continue.”

    Turning to Lebanon, the High Commissioner said Israeli “daily strikes on residential buildings in urban areas are taking an appalling toll on civilians with significant numbers of casualties, destruction and displacement,” while “Hizbullah also continues to fire rockets into Israel, where many thousands are displaced from their homes.”

    He stressed that the risk of a full-fledged regional conflict “remains very high, one that could engulf the lives and the human rights of millions of people,” and added that the “illogic of escalation, must end.”

    On the Ukraine war, Türk said, “nearly 1000 days since Russia’s full-scale invasion, we continue to see terrible devastation characterised by recurring human rights violations and war crimes,” and noted that July 2024 was the deadliest month for civilians in Ukraine since October 2022

    He said, “with the ongoing attacks on crucial energy infrastructure, I fear for Ukrainians this coming winter.”

    On the situation in Sudan, the High Commissioner said, “the warring parties, affiliated groups and regional actors continue to compete for influence and power, forcing a staggering 10 million people to flee their homes and leaving more than 25 million people facing acute hunger.”

    He said, “the situation is desperate, and there is evidence of the commission of war crimes and other atrocity crimes.”

    Türk said, “when my office rings warning bells, as we have over many years for all the situations that I referred to above, the international community needs to listen and act to avert catastrophe.”

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxEyT7UFV9k

    MIL OSI Video

  • MIL-OSI Russia: IMF Executive Board Completes the Fifth Review of the Extended Fund Facility Arrangement for Ukraine

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    October 18, 2024

    • The IMF Board today completed the Fifth Review of the extended arrangement under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF) for Ukraine, enabling a disbursement of about US$1.1 billion (SDR 834.9 million) to Ukraine, which will be channeled for budget support.
    • Ukraine’s economy remains resilient, and performance remains strong under the EFF despite challenging conditions. The authorities met all end-June quantitative performance criteria and completed four structural benchmarks.
    • Sustained reform momentum, domestic revenue mobilization, and timely disbursement of external support are necessary to safeguard macroeconomic stability, restore fiscal and debt sustainability, and enhance institutional reforms.

    Washington, DC: The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) today completed the Fifth Review of the EFF arrangement for Ukraine, enabling the authorities to draw US$1.1 billion (SDR 834.9), which will be channeled for budget support. This will bring the total disbursements under the IMF-supported program to US$8.7 billion.

    Ukraine’s 48-month EFF arrangement, with access of SDR 11.6 billion (equivalent to US$15.5 billion, or about 577 percent of quota), was approved on March 31, 2023, and forms part of a US$151.4 billion support package for Ukraine. The authorities’ IMF-supported program helps anchor policies that sustain fiscal, external, and macro-financial stability at a time of exceptionally high uncertainty. The EFF aims to support the economic recovery, enhance governance, and strengthen institutions with the aim of promoting long-term growth in the context of reconstruction and Ukraine’s path to EU accession.

    All end-June and continuous quantitative performance criteria and indicative targets were met. The authorities have implemented prior action for the review, and completed structural benchmarks relating to tax privileges, public companies affected by the war, customs reform and public investment management, underscoring their continuing commitment to an ambitious reform agenda. Two structural benchmarks have been reset to allow more time for completion of the reform.

    The economy was more resilient than expected in the first half of 2024, with continued growth, moderate inflation, and adequate reserves bolstered by continued sizeable external support. Nevertheless, the outlook for the remainder of the year and 2025 has worsened since the Fourth Review, largely due to sustained Russian attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure and uncertainty about the war; overall, the outlook remains subject to exceptionally high uncertainty.

    Following the Executive Board discussion on Ukraine, Ms. Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of the IMF, issued the following statement[1]:

    1. Russia’s war in Ukraine continues to bring a devastating social and economic toll on Ukraine. Despite the war, macroeconomic and financial stability is being preserved through skillful policymaking by the Ukrainian authorities as well as substantial external support. The economy has remained resilient, despite significant damage to the energy infrastructure, reflecting the continued adaptability of households and firms.
    2. Ukraine’s performance and commitment under the program continues to be strong. All quantitative performance criteria for end-June were met, and those for end-September are expected to have been met. All but one structural benchmark through end-September were completed, while the missed structural benchmark has been reset to accommodate delays in the appointment process partly beyond the control of the authorities. Moreover, two structural benchmarks due later in the year and the prior action for the review was also implemented. The program remains fully financed with a cumulative external financing envelope of US$151 billion in the baseline and US$187 billion in the downside over the 4-year program period, including with new commitments from the Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration Loans for Ukraine (ERA) initiative.
    3. Looking ahead, the recovery is expected to slow amid headwinds from the impact of the attacks on energy infrastructure and the continuing war, while risks to the outlook remain exceptionally high. Preparedness is necessary to enable appropriate policy action should risks materialize.
    4. Ukraine’s financing needs remain large, driven by the continuing war. Timely and predictable external support—on terms consistent with debt sustainability—is essential to closing financing gaps and safeguarding stability. At the same time, decisive domestic revenue mobilization is critical for Ukraine to meet elevated spending needs, respond to shocks, and restore fiscal sustainability, which will require further tax policy measures as well as efforts to improve compliance and combat evasion, as envisioned under the National Revenue Strategy.

    Further strengthening medium-term budgeting, fiscal risk frameworks and transparency, and public investment management should advance in support of these goals.

    1. The Eurobond exchange in August was an important milestone in the authorities’ strategy to restore debt sustainability. Efforts to conclude the remaining steps in line with the authorities’ strategy and the program’s debt sustainability objectives should continue.
    2. Continued exchange rate flexibility under the managed exchange rate regime will help strengthen the resilience of the economy to external shocks. The recent uptick in inflation suggests limited room for further easing in the near term, though inflation remains well-anchored, and the FX cash market continues to show stability. A state-dependent and gradual approach to the easing of FX controls remains essential to safeguard FX reserves. The authorities’ efforts to avoid monetary financing should continue.
    3. The financial sector remains stable. Efforts should continue to strengthen bank resolution and supervision, governance, and contingency planning in view of risks to the outlook.
    4. Continuing the reform momentum in anticorruption and governance, including ensuring the effectiveness of anticorruption institutions and strengthening governance in the energy sector, remain essential to help contain fiscal risks, secure donor confidence and enhance growth, which would also support Ukraine’s path to EU accession.

    Table 1. Ukraine: Selected Economic and Social Indicators, 2021–33

     

    2021

    2022

    2023

    2024

    2025

    2026

    2027

     

     

     

    Act.

    Act.

    Act.

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Proj.

     

     

    Real economy (percent change, unless otherwise indicated)

    Nominal GDP (billions of Ukrainian hryvnias) 1/

    5,451

    5,239

    6,538

    7,542

    8,542

    9,715

    10,761

    Real GDP 1/

    3.4

    -28.8

    5.3

    3.0

    2.5-3.5

    5.3

    4.5

    Contributions:

    Domestic demand

    12.9

    -22.9

    13.9

    6.3

    5.1

    4.6

    4.3

    Private consumption

    4.7

    -16.8

    5.5

    3.1

    3.2

    3.8

    3.5

    Public consumption

    0.1

    12.5

    2.6

    -0.1

    -1.0

    -2.5

    -2.0

    Investment

    8.1

    -18.6

    5.8

    3.3

    2.9

    3.3

    2.7

    Net exports

    -9.5

    -5.9

    -8.6

    -3.3

    -2.6

    0.7

    0.2

    GDP deflator

    24.8

    34.9

    18.5

    12.0

    10.5

    8.0

    6.0

    Unemployment rate (ILO definition; period average, percent)

    9.8

    24.5

    19.1

    14.2

    12.7

    10.4

    9.4

    Consumer prices (period average)

    9.4

    20.2

    12.9

    5.8

    9.0

    7.7

    5.0

    Consumer prices (end of period)

    10.0

    26.6

    5.1

    9.0

    7.5

    6.6

    5.0

    Nominal wages (average)

    20.8

    1.0

    20.1

    16.6

    17.1

    14.1

    10.6

    Real wages (average)

    10.5

    -16.0

    6.4

    10.2

    7.5

    6.0

    5.3

    Savings (percent of GDP)

    12.5

    17.1

    9.7

    9.2

    5.2

    10.5

    16.4

    Private

    12.7

    30.2

    24.6

    25.5

    20.2

    15.7

    14.0

    Public

    -0.2

    -13.1

    -14.8

    -16.3

    -15.0

    -5.1

    2.5

    Investment (percent of GDP)

    14.5

    12.1

    15.1

    17.3

    19.5

    21.0

    22.3

    Private

    10.7

    9.6

    10.4

    14.8

    15.4

    16.6

    17.2

    Public

    3.8

    2.5

    4.8

    2.4

    4.1

    4.4

    5.1

    General Government (percent of GDP)

    Fiscal balance 2/

    -4.0

    -15.6

    -19.6

    -18.7

    -19.2

    -9.5

    -2.7

    Fiscal balance, excl. grants 2/

    -4.0

    -24.8

    -26.1

    -24.5

    -20.0

    -9.8

    -3.8

    External financing (net)

    2.4

    10.8

    16.5

    15.2

    18.2

    8.8

    3.3

    Domestic financing (net), of which:

    1.6

    5.0

    3.1

    3.5

    1.0

    0.8

    -0.6

    NBU

    -0.3

    7.3

    -0.2

    -0.2

    -0.2

    -0.1

    -0.1

    Commercial banks

    1.5

    -1.5

    2.5

    3.5

    1.0

    0.8

    -0.6

    Public and publicly-guaranteed debt

    50.5

    77.7

    82.3

    95.6

    106.6

    107.6

    102.6

    Money and credit (end of period, percent change)

    Base money

    11.2

    19.6

    23.3

    16.7

    13.2

    12.7

    12.4

    Broad money

    12.0

    20.8

    23.0

    15.4

    13.3

    11.9

    10.1

    Credit to nongovernment

    8.4

    -3.1

    -0.5

    9.0

    12.9

    21.5

    18.7

    Balance of payments (percent of GDP)

    Current account balance

    -1.9

    5.0

    -5.4

    -8.1

    -14.3

    -10.5

    -5.9

    Foreign direct investment

    3.8

    0.1

    2.6

    2.0

    2.1

    4.3

    4.9

    Gross reserves (end of period, billions of U.S. dollars)

    30.9

    28.5

    40.5

    42.6

    44.9

    49.1

    52.4

    Months of next year’s imports of goods and services

    4.5

    3.8

    5.1

    5.1

    5.4

    5.7

    6.0

    Percent of short-term debt (remaining maturity)

    67.5

    64.3

    89.5

    106.2

    106.3

    118.3

    124.5

    Percent of the IMF composite metric (float)

    104.4

    103.6

    124.3

    113.5

    104.7

    104.0

    106.9

    Goods exports (annual volume change in percent)

    35.1

    -43.7

    -15.4

    15.7

    6.2

    14.0

    6.3

    Goods imports (annual volume change in percent)

    17.0

    -24.1

    21.5

    14.1

    7.0

    8.8

    9.5

    Goods terms of trade (percent change)

    -8.4

    -11.6

    3.6

    0.3

    -1.8

    1.2

    1.4

    Exchange rate

    Hryvnia per U.S. dollar (end of period)

    27.3

    36.6

    38.0

    Hryvnia per U.S. dollar (period average)

    27.3

    32.3

    36.6

    Real effective rate (deflator-based, percent change)

    10.2

    27.5

    -1.5

    Memorandum items:

    Per capita GDP / Population (2017): US$2,640 / 44.8 million

    Literacy / Poverty rate (2022 est 3/): 100 percent / 25 percent

    Sources: Ukrainian authorities; World Bank, World Development Indicators; and IMF staff estimates.

    1/ GDP is compiled as per SNA 2008 and excludes territories that are or were in direct combat zones and temporarily occupied by Russia (consistent with the TMU).

    2/ The general government includes the central and local governments and the social funds.

    3/ Based on World Bank estimates.

    [1] At the conclusion of the discussion, the Managing Director, as Chairman of the Board, summarizes the views of Executive Directors, and this summary is transmitted to the country’s authorities. An explanation of any qualifiers used in summing up can be found here: http://www.IMF.org/external/np/sec/misc/qualifiers.htm.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Camila Perez

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2024/10/18/pr24381-ukraine-imf-executive-board-completes-fifth-rev-eff-arrangement

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Briefing – Russia’s strategy for Latin America: Strengthening ties in the light of the 16th BRICS Summit in Kazan (Russia) – 18-10-2024

    Source: European Parliament

    Since Russia started its war of aggression against Ukraine by illegally annexing the Crimean peninsula, it has been seeking to foster relations with countries in the Global South that are not firmly aligned with the Western world. In 2023, a change in Russia’s foreign policy of 2016 placed a greater emphasis on Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) and Africa, where the Kremlin has been building influence since the Soviet era. Russia’s strategic goal is to counter the United States presence in the neighbourhood and to ensure that Latin America and the Caribbean remain geopolitically neutral. Russia is also pursuing the goal of building a new multipolar world order. Russia’s longstanding political and security partners in LAC are Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela, each under an authoritarian regime. Russia is also trying to strengthen its political ties with other LAC countries such as Bolivia, Brazil and El Salvador. With all LAC countries, Russia works through bilateral agreements and intergovernmental forums, in particular BRICS and the G20. From an economic perspective, Russia’s footprint in the region is very limited: its trade with LAC countries accounts for a mere 2 % of its global trade. Nevertheless, Russia has gained political leverage through its economic ties, especially due to key LAC countries’ reliance on Russian fertilisers and diesel. In addition to political and economic relations, Russia has signed several military cooperation agreements with Latin American countries over the past two decades. Currently, military cooperation is primarily limited to Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela. Russian arms sales to the region have steadily declined since Russia’s invasion of Crimea and are now insignificant. Alongside political, economic and military ties, Russia employs disinformation campaigns to undermine liberal democracies and promote Russian propaganda narratives.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Translation: 18/10/2024 Unanimity of the European Council on migration

    MIL ASI Translation. Region: Polish/Europe –

    Fuente: Gobierno de Polonia en poleco.

    European Council unanimous on migration18.10.2024At the October European Council summit in Brussels, Prime Minister Donald Tusk presented the Polish perspective on migration. In the face of growing challenges on the EU’s eastern border, leaders expressed solidarity with Poland. The European Council unanimously adopted conclusions on migration, which state that no country, including Russia and Belarus, may abuse values such as the right to asylum. Poland is to make “autonomous decisions.”

    European solidarity with Poland

    EU leaders, regardless of their political views, expressed solidarity with Poland, which faces serious migration challenges. The actions of Russia and Belarus aim to use migration as a tool to destabilize the situation on our eastern border.

    The key words are those that have been written down – Russia, Belarus or any other country cannot abuse our values, including the right to asylum, or undermine our democracy.

    – said the Prime Minister during a press conference in Brussels.

    Politicians from various countries expressed their understanding of Poland’s situation related to aggressive, illegal migration on its eastern border and the need to implement effective methods in response to these challenges.

    Understanding the challenges of migration

    European leaders have recognized that the current migration pact is not an adequate response to the growing threat of mass, illegal migration – especially that organized by foreign governments. The migration summit emphasized that traditional methods do not bring the expected results.

    It is becoming increasingly clear to European leaders that the methods used so far, including the migration pact, are not the answer to the threat posed by mass, illegal migration.

    – noted Donald Tusk.

    The discussions also highlighted the need to introduce tougher solutions that respond to changing circumstances, because “the statistics and numbers are overwhelming.” It was emphasized that Europe does not have the capacity to accept all those who want to apply for asylum. Para expandirse, that a new approach to migration policy in the European Union must be created.

    Para, as I said a few days ago in Warsaw, that at least a profound correction of this paradigm is needed when it comes to migration policy in Europe. We need to change the attitude based so far on the principle that found its expression in the Geneva Convention

    – said the head of the Polish government.

    During the Brussels summit there was clear agreement on reforming migration policy.

    Poland’s autonomous decisions

    The European Council also emphasised Poland’s right to make autonomous decisions on migration matters.

    For me it is important that everyone agreed that Poland will make decisions autonomously and that they will be accepted

    – noted Donald Tusk.

    In the face of the migration crisis, the possibilities of cooperation with other Member States were highlighted. European institutions and other countries show great openness to various forms of assistance.

    anchoo[contenido incrustado]Photos (3)

    MILES AXIS

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This article is a translation. Apologies should the grammar and/or sentence structure not be perfect.

    MIL Translation OSI

  • MIL-OSI Translation: 18/10/2024 Minister Sikorski met with the head of Italian diplomacy Tajani

    MIL ASI Translation. Region: Polish/Europe –

    Fuente: Gobierno de Polonia en poleco.

    This was the first meeting of the heads of Polish and Italian diplomacy in seven years. The topics of consultations included, among others, defence within NATO and the European Union, migration policy, support for Ukraine and the EU enlargement policy. An example of very good bilateral relations is the cooperation between Poland and Italy in the field of security, related to the participation of the Italian Air Force and Navy in NATO operations on the territory of Poland and the presence of the Military Contingent in the Mediterranean Sea as part of the EU mission. Minister Sikorski emphasised that he and Minister Tajani see a threat to the Schengen system – previously it was a threat from the Mediterranean Sea, the Balkan route, and now also from the Belarusian border. – Belarus is waging a hybrid war using pseudo-migrants, but the effect of this is important – our societies must regain the belief that governments at both the national and EU levels enforce this foreign right to control migration – emphasized the head of the Polish MFA. The minister also appealed for broader Western assistance to Ukraine, especially in the field of weapons to defend airspace, and for the lifting of the ban on the use of Western long-range weapons in Russia. In addition, the head of the Polish MFA thanked his Italian counterpart for the joint protest against Israel’s attacks on the UNIFIL contingent in Lebanon. The interlocutors discussed the situation in the Middle East, expressing concern over the escalation of tensions in Lebanon and emphasizing the need for the international community to act in favor of a two-state solution. On the European agenda and enlargement policy, EU Minister Sikorski assured his interlocutor that progress in the area of EU accession of both the so-called The Eastern Trio (Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia) and the Western Balkan countries will be one of the priorities of the Polish Presidency of the EU Council. Minister Tajani thanked the head of Polish diplomacy for the proposal, cf. During the Polish Presidency in the first half of 2025, they traveled together to Africa, which is too important a continent to be exposed solely to the influence of Russia or China. At the end of the visit, Minister Sikorski paid tribute to the Polish soldiers who died in the Battle of Monte Cassino and are buried at the Polish War Cemetery located there. This year we are celebrating the 80th anniversary of the battle, in which 923 Polish soldiers died, 2,931 were wounded, and 345 were reported missing. The Minister laid a wreath under the Virtuti Militari Cross at the Cemetery, where 1,048 Polish soldiers are buried – in addition to those who died during the fighting, soldiers of the 2nd Polish Corps who died before the assault and who gave their lives in further fighting in the massif, mainly in the battles for Piedimonte, are also buried there.

    Photo: Konrad Laskowski/MSZ

    MILES AXIS

    EDITOR’S NOTE: This article is a translation. Apologies should the grammar and/or sentence structure not be perfect.

    MIL Translation OSI

  • MIL-OSI Russia: IMF Executive Board Completes the First Review under the Extended Credit Facility (ECF) Arrangement for Ethiopia

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    October 18, 2024

    • The IMF Board completed the first review under the Extended Credit Facility (ECF) for Ethiopia, allowing the authorities to draw the equivalent of about US$340.7 million (SDR 255.6 million). The ECF was approved by IMF Board in July 2024 and forms part of a US$10.7 billion support package from development partners and creditors for Ethiopia.
    • The Ethiopian authorities have shown strong commitment to their homegrown economic reform program. Implementation of ECF-supported reforms is advancing well.

    Washington, DC: The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) completed today the first review of the 48-month Extended Credit Facility (ECF) for Ethiopia. The Board’s decision allows for an immediate disbursement of about US$340.7 million (SDR 255.6 million), which will help Ethiopia meet its balance of payments needs. The completion of the review brings total disbursements under the arrangement to about US$1.363 billion.

    Ethiopia’s ECF arrangement for a total of SDR 2.556 billion (850 percent of quota) or about US$3.4 billion at the time of program approval on July 29, 2024 (see Press Release 24/291) is aimed at supporting the authorities’ Homegrown Economic Reform Agenda (HGER) to address macroeconomic imbalances and lay the foundations for private sector led growth.

    All quantitative performance criteria and four out of five structural benchmarks for the first review have been met. The emergency liquidity assistance framework has been finalized prior to Board approval with a slight delay from end-September target date.

    The implementation of the authorities’ economic program, including the transition to the new exchange rate regime, has been commendable. The spread between the formal and parallel market exchange rates has narrowed to low levels, with little sign of disruption to the broader economy. The supply of foreign exchange is picking up, helping alleviate acute foreign exchange shortages. Nonetheless, some unmet foreign exchange demand persists as economic agents are still adjusting to the new FX regime.

    Steady implementation of the HGER reform plan will be key to macroeconomic stability and stronger economic growth. Continued tight monetary policy and elimination of monetary financing of the government will be key to durably reducing inflation. Expanding social safety nets is critical to mitigating the impact of reforms on vulnerable people. Maintaining momentum on domestic revenue mobilization and structural reforms in the SOE sector is essential to creating sufficient space for social and developmental capital spending.

    The authorities continue their efforts to restore debt sustainability. Financing assurances and adjustment efforts are consistent with IMF policy requirements and program parameters.

    Following the Executive Board discussion, Mr. Bo Li, Deputy Managing Director and Chairman of the Board, made the following statement:

    “Ethiopia’s program under the ECF has made a solid start, and the transition to a more flexible exchange rate has progressed well. Transitional one-off arrangements to address the foreign exchange (FX) backlog from past fuel imports are in place, relying principally on market participants with an additional contribution from the National Bank of Ethiopia (NBE). As economic agents adjust to the new FX regime, reform momentum and clear communication will need to continue to ensure a fully successful and sustained switch to a floating exchange rate.

    “Continuing to restrict NBE’s FX interventions and additional policy measures to support FX market development will be critical to enhance market efficiency and deepening. Prudent macroeconomic policies, including continued tight monetary policy and the elimination of monetary financing of government deficits are essential to reducing imbalances and shoring up macroeconomic stability.

    “Implementation of the early stages of the authorities’ monetary policy reforms and the shift to an interest-rate based regime has been encouraging, including the steady uptake of NBE open market operations. The authorities should step up efforts to improve monetary policy transmission, including by enhancing treasury bill market functioning. Close supervision and enforcement of net open position regulations for banks will help address financial sector vulnerabilities. 

    “The authorities have embarked on ambitious and comprehensive tax mobilization reforms, which will be guided by the recently approved National Medium-Term Revenue Strategy. The new VAT law further streamlines exemptions, expands the revenue base, and strengthens administration and compliance framework. Sustained tax revenue mobilization reforms are critical for creating sufficient space for social and development spending needs. The authorities are implementing plans to expand the targeted social safety net (PSNP), which will deliver cost-effective and efficient support to vulnerable people and mitigate the social impact of the FX reform. 

    “Amendments to the law governing the NBE tabled in Parliament include important improvements to the NBE’s mandate, functions, and powers. Robust lender-of-last resort provisions and legal safeguards to central bank autonomy and governance will also be important.

    Continued steps to secure debt treatment is crucial to restore debt sustainability. The progress made on debt restructuring negotiations under the Common Framework is welcome. The authorities are working to reach an agreement on debt treatment with official creditors by the time of the second program review. Negotiations with commercial creditors should follow on comparable terms. The authorities plan to develop a debt management strategy with Fund technical assistance.”

    Ethiopia Selected Economic Indicators, 2021/22-2028/29

    2021/22

    2022/23

    2023/24

    2024/25

    2025/26

    2026/27

    2027/28

    2028/29

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Proj.

    Output

    Real GDP growth (%)

    6.4

    7.2

    6.1

    6.5

    7.1

    7.7

    8.0

    7.8

    Prices

    Inflation – average (%)

    33.9

    32.5

    26.6

    25.0

    16.7

    12.2

    10.4

    9.6

    General government finances

    Revenue (% GDP)

    8.1

    7.9

    7.5

    8.4

    9.8

    10.9

    11.3

    11.5

    Expenditure (% GDP)

    12.7

    10.8

    9.9

    11.5

    12.4

    13.4

    13.7

    14.0

    Fiscal balance, including grants (% GDP)

    -4.2

    -2.6

    -2.0

    -1.7

    -2.1

    -2.0

    -2.0

    -2.0

    Public debt (% GDP)1

    48.9

    40.2

    34.7

    43.6

    39.1

    36.0

    33.6

    31.6

    Money and Credit

    Broad money (% change)

    27.2

    26.6

    14.1

    28.4

    28.3

    30.6

    22.1

    21.0

    Credit to private sector and state-owned enterprises (% change)

    18.9

    24.1

    9.7

    -14.3

    37.9

    40.1

    24.2

    21.1

    Balance of payments

    Current account (% GDP)

    -4.0

    -2.8

    -2.4

    -4.4

    -3.3

    -2.5

    -2.1

    -1.9

    FDI (%GDP)

    2.6

    2.1

    1.6

    2.7

    3.2

    2.9

    3.0

    3.0

    Reserves (in months of imports)

    0.8

    0.5

    0.7

    1.4

    2.1

    2.6

    3.5

    3.6

    External debt (% GDP)

    24.0

    18.1

    15.4

    28.9

    26.8

    24.5

    22.5

    19.7

    Exchange rate

    Real effective exchange rate (% change, end of period, depreciation –)

    10.1

    24.0

    1/Public and publicly guaranteed external debt, which includes long-term foreign liabilities of NBE and external debt of Ethio-Telecom. Does not include expected debt relief.

    For digital posting, please submit press release with an editable table (no images) already inserted in Microsoft Word file to ensure that the data in the SEI table is displayed as prepared.]

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Tatiana Mossot

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    @IMFSpokesperson

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2024/10/18/pr-24383-ethiopia-imf-completes-the-1st-review-under-the-ecf-arrangement

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III Holds a Press Conference

    Source: United States Department of Defense

    SABRINA SINGH, DEPUTY PENTAGON PRESS SECRETARY:  OK, everyone, good afternoon. Thank you for being here today. It is my pleasure to introduce Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin. The Secretary will deliver some opening remarks, and then we will have time to take a few questions. I will moderate those questions and call on journalists.

    With that, Mr. Secretary?

    SECRETARY OF DEFENSE LLOYD J. AUSTIN III:  Thanks, Sabrina.

    Well, good afternoon, everyone. It’s great to be back at NATO. But I wanted to start with just a few words about the Middle East.

    As you all know, Israel yesterday killed Sinwar, the leader of Hamas. That’s a major achievement, and it opens a major opportunity for progress.

    Sinwar was the architect of the October 7th terrorist assault on Israel. His plot left 1,200 people dead, including civilians from more than 30 other countries, and that includes the United States. He was responsible for the deaths of many Americans over the years, including more than 40 Americans murdered on October 7th and four murdered American hostages.

    Sinwar devoted his life to wrecking the chances of peace between the Israelis and the Palestinians. He’s finally been brought to justice, and that removes a huge obstacle.

    Our top priority is the 101 hostages still kidnapped in Gaza, including our own American hostages. They have been through hell, and so have their families, and the hostages should not have to suffer one more hour in captivity, and those who are holding hostages should release them immediately.

    Sinwar’s death also provides an extraordinary opportunity to achieve a lasting cease-fire to end this awful war and to rush humanitarian aid into Gaza. Our forces in the region stand ready to assist in Israel’s defense, to deter aggression and to reduce the risk of all-out war, and we will continue to drive hard to bring all of the hostages home and to end the conflicts in both Gaza and Lebanon through principled diplomacy.

    Now, let me turn back to our work here at NATO. This has been an historic defense ministerial for three reasons. First, this is our new Secretary General’s inaugural ministerial meeting, so I want to thank Mark Rutte and his staff for convening us. And I also look forward to working very closely with Mark and his team.

    Second, this is our first defense ministerial with NATO’s Indo-Pacific partners, Australia, Japan, New Zealand, and the Republic of Korea, and that just underscores the importance of working with our partners in the Indo-Pacific on boosting industrial base resilience, combating disinformation and much, much more.

    And third, this ministerial is the first high-level NATO gathering since our 75th anniversary summit in Washington back in July. The summit was a major success. We welcomed Sweden as a NATO ally. We endorsed a NATO industrial capacity expansion pledge, and that will strengthen the defense industrial base on both sides of the Atlantic and increase large-scale multinational procurement and help deliver capabilities swiftly and securely. We also launched the NATO security assistance and training for Ukraine, or NSATU. Now, that’s our military effort to plan, coordinate and arrange delivery of the security assistance that Ukraine needs to prevail against Russian aggression. We strengthened NATO’s deterrence and defense. We deepened ties with our global partners, especially in the Indo-Pacific, and we celebrated 75 years of the strongest, most successful defensive alliance in history.

    I’m proud of all this progress, but we’ve still got work to do. Our priority is implementing the important agreements from NATO’s recent summits, and today, we continued our progress. We’re forging NATO’s most robust defense plans since the end of the Cold War, and that will help ensure that we have the forces and capabilities to meet any contingency. That includes air and missile defense, which are crucial for defending the allied airspace, and earlier this month, General Cavoli directed a reinforcement of NATO air surveillance in Romania to monitor Russian military activity.

    NATO allies continue to make robust investments in air and missile defense, but we must invest in many other areas to meet our requirements, so I’m glad to say that we’re sharing the burden of collective defense more than ever. In this year, a record 23 NATO allies are hitting or topping our shared commitment to spend at least two percent of GDP on defense. But we still need each and every single ally to meet this mutually-agreed-upon obligation as soon as possible, and that will let us fulfill the requirements of our new plans and hit our capability targets. And by investing in our trans-Atlantic defense industrial base and scaling up military production, we can send a long-term demand signal to industry.

    AUSTIN:  You know, we also met yesterday with our Indo-Pacific partners and with the European Union. It was a very productive meeting, and it underscored the profound links among Euro-Atlantic security and Indo-Pacific security.

    We’re concerned by the PRC’s increasingly coercive behavior in the Indo-Pacific, which has profound implications for the whole world. We’re also troubled by the growing alignment between Russia and the People’s Republic of China, including the PRC’s support for Putin’s indefensible war of choice against Ukraine, and that makes our close cooperation with our Indo-Pacific friends more vital than ever.

    We also held a NATO-Ukraine Council meeting yesterday. Minister Umerov gave us some great insights, and we made clear our enduring commitment to a free and sovereign Ukraine.

    Like countries of goodwill around the world, our NATO allies continue to stand up for Ukraine’s sovereignty and self-defense, and the United States and our allies and partners are determined to stand by Ukraine for the long haul, and we’ll stand by one another.

    The foundation of NATO is a collective defense commitment in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty. The U.S. commitment to Article 5 remains ironclad, and we will defend the sovereignty in the territory of every member of this alliance. Whatever changes lie ahead, we will tackle them together, and that solidarity is the reason why NATO is the greatest defensive alliance in history.

    And thanks again, and with that, I’ll be glad to take some questions.

    SINGH:  Great, thank you. Our first question will go to Phil Stewart from Reuters.

    Right here in the middle. Yeah. No, you’re OK.

    QUESTION:  OK, thank you. So you were saying that Israel has an opportunity to end the war in Gaza, but Israel’s prime minister is vowing today to keep fighting. Do you support Israel’s new campaign to, quote, “stop the axis of evil,” end quote, as Netanyahu put it? Or is Israel missing an opportunity here?

    And on — on Ukraine, President Zelenskyy told the Financial Times that a formal invitation to join NATO is the only way Ukraine can survive Russia’s invasion. Do you agree with that assessment? And more broadly, do you endorse his victory plan? Thank you.

    AUSTIN:  So which one of those questions do you want me to answer, Phil?

    (LAUGHTER)

    All right, let’s start with the question as to whether or not there is an opportunity available with respect to Gaza. Of course there is, and we would hope that we can work together to take advantage of that opportunity.

    The first thing, Phil, that we need to focus on is a return of the hostages. Again, you heard Prime Minister publicly state yesterday that anyone who has control of hostages, he would encourage them to return them, and — and again, I would hope that they would do so.

    Beyond that, you know, I think there are other opportunities, and we will see how things evolve. But clearly, there are opportunities for a change in direction, and we would hope that, you know, parties would — would take advantage of that both in Lebanon — in Gaza and in Lebanon.

    The second question was — as I recall, Phil, was about the victory plan and whether or not we endorse the victory plan. Again, the victory plan is President Zelenskyy’s plan, and we’re going to do everything that we can to provide the security assistance to support the president as he tries to accomplish his objectives.

    But what we all want to make sure that we continue to do is to link military objectives to strategic objectives, and, you know, that dialogue continues. And you know, I just met with Minister Umerov today. We talked through a number of those things. Again, our focus is going to continue to be on doing everything that we can to support the victory plan, or support President Zelenskyy. It’s not my position to evaluate publicly his plan. We have been supporting him by providing security assistance in a major way for over two and a half years. We’re going to continue to do that.

    Next question.

    SINGH:  Thank you. Thank you. Our second question will go to Andrey Smolyakov, Novaya Gazeta Europa.

    Right here in the back, in the middle. Yeah.

    QUESTION:  Thank you. Mr. Secretary, Ukrainian military has been able to carry out some effective UAV strikes deep into Russian territory, but there have been reports, especially in Russian and Ukrainian-language media, that the U.S. has discouraged those attacks. Is there any substance to those reports? And if so, is the U.S. willing to support such operations in the future?

    AUSTIN:  Actually, Andrey, we’ve seen the Ukrainians use their long-range UAV strike capability to great effect, and we saw recently that they were able to take out a number of strategic-level ammunition supply points, which has had an impact on the battlefield.

    I think what’s important to point out here, Andrey, is that they were able to produce these UAVs in Ukraine. They were able to scale that production rapidly. The UAVs have proven to be very effective and accurate. And again, when you consider the fact that one precision-guided missile costs, in some cases, close to $1 million, depending on what it is, and these UAVs, they can produce in great numbers at a fraction of the cost. So when you look at the balance sheet and the effects that are being created on the battlefield, I think this is a great capability. How they use that capability that they’re producing is going to be their call, Andrey, so…

    SINGH:  Thank you. Our next question will go to Phil Green, right here, Air & Space Magazine. Right here, in the blue.

    QUESTION:  Thank you, Mr. Secretary.

    SINGH:  I’m sorry — Chris Gordon. I said “Phil”. Sorry, sorry.

    QUESTION:  Thank you, Sabrina. Thank you, Mr. …

    AUSTIN:  You’re Phil now…

    SINGH:  Yeah, you’re…

    AUSTIN:  I’m kidding, Chris. I know you’re Chris, so…

    (LAUGHTER)

    SINGH:  Yeah.

    QUESTION:  Good to hear. Sir, the world is in a very difficult situation, and I have two questions regarding that situation. First, if there is a settlement in Gaza, is the Pentagon prepared to provide logistical support and military advice to an Arab-led stabilization force if there are no U.S. boots on the ground?

    And then secondly, to put a finer point on my colleague’s question earlier, President Zelenskyy’s repeatedly appealed to the U.S. to use ATACMS to strike a broader range of targets inside of Russia and to do so more quickly than drones. The Biden administration has not allowed this. Have Putin’s nuclear threats worked?

    AUSTIN:  Regarding Putin’s nuclear threats, again, you’ve heard me say a number of times that I think any kind of nuclear saber-rattling is reckless and dangerous, and we would call upon Putin and others to not employ that kind of language.

    In terms of whether or not we would participate in any kind of stabilization efforts in Gaza, I think that that’s going to require the contributions of a number of countries. Hopefully, countries in the region will step up. There quite possibly is, can be a part for the United States to play in that, as well. What part that would be and what that would look like, Chris, we’re going to have to work with our allies and partners to scope that out. And I certainly would not have any announcements to make on anything like that.

    The first step though is we’ve got to get to some sort of ceasefire, and then we need to make sure that we’re putting the right things in place to stabilize the area and provide for some sort of security going forward. But that’s left to be defined yet.

    SINGH:  Thank you. And our last question will go to Teri Schultz, Deutsche Welle.

    QUESTION:  Thank you, Secretary Austin. I’m — I’m very interested in the future of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group, a group that you yourself created. I mean, what is the future of this, given that nobody knows what’s going to happen after November under either administration that would take over? What will happen with this group? How do you consolidate what you have done, what has been done under your leadership? But even more of interest to the Ukrainians, do you have a sense after this last meeting that there’s — there’s enough momentum to provide enough to help Ukraine tilt the balance on the — on the battlefield as is necessary, you yourself say, to some day moving to discussions about ending the war?

    AUSTIN:  Yeah, thanks, Teri. So we’re — we’ve been doing two things simultaneously. We’re providing — focused on providing Ukraine what it needs to be successful on a battlefield today as it tries to defend its sovereign territory, and it’s been very successful at that. And I would remind everybody that Ukraine has taken on the largest military in Europe, and for two and a half years it has successfully defended its territory.

    And Putin has not achieved, not one strategic objective that he set out to achieve. Kyiv still stands. The Ukrainian government did not fall. And I could name a number of other things, but they have been very, very successful. So helping them defend the — in the current fight is one objective.

    The other objective is making sure that we help them get what’s necessary to be able to defend against aggression in the future and deter aggression as well. And that’s what the capability coalitions have been designed to do.

    As you know, we have an Air Force Capability Coalition. It was focused initially and still is focused on helping Ukraine get a fighter aircraft capability. And as you know, Ukraine now has F-16 capability. It will — we will continue to build upon that.

    There’s an artillery capability coalition that’s also being very successful, and it’s helping Ukraine acquire the artillery systems and the munitions that it needs not only for today but for the long haul as well.

    There’s an IT coalition that helps make sure that Ukraine has what it needs to be able to function in the information space, in the information domain and be effective. That IT coalition has been very, very effective, very impressive.

    There’s a drone coalition.

    And so these coalitions are designed to ensure that, at the end of the day, Ukraine has what it needs to be able to deter aggression and defend itself going forward. And thank you for bringing it up because it’s a thing that not many people pay attention to. But every day, we are building long-term capability for Ukraine.

    And, you know, I have to applaud the work of our allies and partners who are leading some of these coalitions and rallying support for Ukraine and, you know, digging deep to provide them what we think they’ll need going forward.

    So I think that will help to spell success for Ukraine in the long haul, and I appreciate you bringing it up, Teri.

    SINGH:  Thank you, everyone. That concludes today’s press conference.

    MIL OSI USA News