Category: Vehicles

  • MIL-OSI USA: Gillibrand, Schumer Announce Port Authority Of NY/NJ To Receive Over $347 Million From Program Gillibrand Helped Create, Including $344 Million To Deploy Zero-Emission Equipment And Upgrade Green Energy Infrastructure

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator for New York Kirsten Gillibrand
    Today, U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer announced that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has selected the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) to receive an anticipated $344,138,135 through EPA’s Clean Ports Program for its proposed project, Catalyzing Change: Zero-Emissions NY-NJ Port Projects for a Greener Future. This project will support the installation of zero-emission equipment and promote good-paying and union jobs at the Port of New York and New Jersey. The grant is funded by the Inflation Reduction Act, the most substantial climate change and clean energy legislation in history. Senator Gillibrand was an original cosponsor and champion of the standalone legislation (the Climate Smart Ports Act) to create the Clean Ports Program, and she helped secure its enactment as part of the Inflation Reduction Act.
    According to the EPA, PANYNJ’s proposed project “includes the deployment of electric cargo handling equipment and drayage trucks with supporting charging infrastructure, including through a ZE Equipment for Ports (ZEEP) Voucher Incentive Program and Green Drayage Accelerator (GDA) program. PANYNJ commits to reducing the number of polluting vehicles at the port by scrapping a portion of the existing fleet. The project also includes the installation of vessel shore power infrastructure. As part of this project, PANYNJ will implement a comprehensive community engagement plan and train workers to operate and maintain new equipment and infrastructure.”
    In addition to the over $344 million grant for the zero-emission technology deployment project, EPA selected PANYNJ to receive $3,000,000 to support a proposed climate and air quality project, which is also through EPA’s Clean Ports Program.  
    “I fought hard to secure $3 billion via the Inflation Reduction Act for the EPA to fund a new program for zero-emission port equipment and to modernize infrastructure as well as climate and air quality planning at ports across the country,” said Senator Schumer. “I’m proud to announce more than $344 million—the second largest award in the country—for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to deploy zero-emission equipment, install charging equipment, and train workers for new green jobs. This substantial federal investment will help transform Port Liberty NY on Staten Island by replacing harmful diesel-powered equipment with zero-emission electric infrastructure.”
    “This over $347 million investment in the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey will lay the foundation for a stronger, more sustainable future,” said Senator Gillibrand. “This funding will promote the use of zero-emission equipment and clean power, as well as train workers for the green energy jobs of the future. I am proud to have helped secure the creation of the transformative Clean Ports Program in the Inflation Reduction Act and am thrilled about today’s historic investment. Not only are we improving air quality and combating climate change, but we’re creating good-paying jobs and putting New York and the United States in position to lead in global clean energy.”
    The selection of the PANYNJ projects was announced as part of the Biden-Harris administration’s Investing in America agenda, which today announced nearly $3 billion of investments in Clean Ports.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Used car ratings provide a roadmap to second hand safety

    Source: New South Wales Government 2

    Headline: Used car ratings provide a roadmap to second hand safety

    Published: 30 October 2024

    Released by: Minister for Regional Transport and Roads, Minister for Transport


    Used Car Safety Ratings released today show the wide gap between a safe second-hand vehicle and a poor performer in a crash.

    The NSW Government is urging used car buyers – particularly young people and their parents looking for a first car – to use the guide to buy a car that protects most for a particular price point.

    The annual guide shows a driver of the lowest rated vehicle is ten times more likely to be killed or seriously injured in a crash than a driver in the safest vehicle.

    Footage released today by the NSW Government shows the dramatic difference in outcomes when a 2012 Great Wall V200 and a 2012 Holden Colorado were crashed head on.

    The one star-rated Great Wall is decimated in the crash, putting driver and passenger at risk of serious injury while the four-star Colorado provided significantly better safety protection.

    The 2024 Used Car Safety guide rates 404 vehicles manufactured since 2000. Of those, 110 earned an “excellent” five-star rating – four more than in 2023 and 55 more than in 2022.

    The best of the five-star vehicles are marked as a ‘Safer Pick’, with 60 per cent of those vehicles available to purchase second hand for less than $10,000.

    Safer picks include:

    Mazda 3 (2013 – 2019)

    Toyota Camry (2011 – 2022)

    Volkswagen Touareg (2011 – 2019)

    Cars that received a very poor one-star rating include:

    Ford Fiesta (2004 – 2008)

    Hyundai Accent (2000 – 2006)

    Toyota Camry (1997- 2002)

    Holden Commodore VT/VX (1997 – 2002)

    The vast majority of the vehicles given a ‘Safer Pick’ rating were manufactured from 2008 onwards, demonstrating the benefits of more advanced safety equipment and design improvements like electronic stability control and advanced occupant protection systems.

    The ratings, which are in their 32nd year, were produced by Monash University in partnership with Transport for NSW and other transport agencies around Australia and New Zealand to help motorists choose the safest used car that fits their budget, needs, and lifestyle.

    The guide is available at https://towardszero.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-10/ucsr-brochure-2024.pdf

    Minister for Roads John Graham said:

    “The hunt for a second-hand car has generally focused on a car that will not break down. No one wants to buy a lemon.

    “What is just as important is considering which used car delivers the safest performance for your budget. Your choice might literally save your life. 

    “The Used Car Safety Ratings guide provide simple, reliable safety information at no cost into the hands of vehicle buyers.

    “I urge parents of young people who may be looking for a first car to consider safety above all else and if you can buy a vehicle that is the safest in its category or price point, do so.

    “A driver behind the wheel of the lowest-rated vehicle is ten times more likely to be killed or seriously injured compared to a driver in the safest vehicle. The choice is that clear.”

    “With more than 60 per cent of the best-rated cars available for $10,000 or less, you don’t have to pick the most expensive car on the market to make a safer choice.

    Minister for Regional Transport and Roads Jenny Aitchison said:

    “For drivers in regional NSW, distances of travel are longer and many people use older vehicles, so choosing a vehicle with a high safety rating increases your chances of surviving a crash.

    “The 2024 Used Car Safety Ratings guide helps regional drivers find the safest options, ensuring they are well-protected no matter where their journey takes them.

    “Cost of living, particularly in regional areas, is an important issue for the Government and that is why we are encouraging everyone considering purchasing a second-hand car to use this guide to ensure they choose a safe vehicle.”

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Six Charged in Scheme to Defraud the Federal Government

    Source: US State of Vermont

    Six defendants have been charged for their roles in schemes to rig bids, defraud the government and pay bribes and kickbacks in connection with the sale of IT products and services to federal government purchasers, which resulted in overcharges of millions of dollars to the U.S. government, including the Department of Defense (DoD). 

    On Oct. 9 and Oct. 16, a federal grand jury in Baltimore returned indictments against two defendants. Four other defendants were also charged. These are the first charges in the Justice Department’s ongoing investigation into IT manufacturers, distributors and resellers who sell products and services to government purchasers, including to the intelligence community. 

    “Antitrust crimes can undermine competition for products and services that are vital to our national security,” said Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “When fraudsters siphon taxpayer funds, the Antitrust Division and its Procurement Collusion Strike Force (PCSF) partners across the government will hold accountable those who collude to subvert competition, line their pockets with federal procurement dollars and compromise the integrity of our intelligence community programs.”

    “This office and our partners will use all available resources to hold accountable those who would undermine and distort the government’s procurement of goods and services, especially those related to our cybersecurity infrastructure,” said U.S. Attorney Erek L. Barron for the District of Maryland. 

    “This investigation demonstrates the vital need to protect the DoD procurement process, particularly within the Intelligence Community,” said Special Agent in Charge Christopher Dillard of the DoD Office of Inspector General, Defense Criminal Investigative Service (DCIS), Mid-Atlantic Field Office. “The Defense Criminal Investigative Service is committed to identifying fraudsters who abuse public trust and enrich themselves through criminal schemes.”

    “There is no place for fraudsters and crooks scheming to manipulate the government bidding process for personal gain,” said Special Agent in Charge William J. DelBagno of the FBI Baltimore Field Office. “The FBI remains steadfastly committed to identifying, investigating and bringing to justice those conspiring to enrich themselves by cheating taxpayers.”

    “Investigating complex fraud schemes is a top priority of ours,” said National Security Agency Acting Inspector General Kevin Gerrity. “I commend our team, our law enforcement partners and the Justice Department for their work protecting the integrity of federal contracting.”

    “Each part of the government must do its part to detect and prosecute instances of waste, fraud and abuse, and CIA’s Office of Inspector General was pleased to join its law enforcement partners in investigating this egregious case,” said CIA Inspector General Robin C. Ashton.

    United States v. Victor Marquez

    Victor M. Marquez, a Maryland resident and owner of two IT companies with significant government contracts, was charged in a four-count indictment with wire fraud conspiracy, wire fraud and major fraud against the United States for rigging bids and inflating the amount of money obtained from valuable IT contracts. 

    Antwann C.K. Rawls, an employee of one of Marquez’s companies, and Scott A. Reefe, an IT sales executive, have been charged for their respective roles in the conspiracy.

    As alleged in the indictment, Marquez, Rawls, Reefe and their co-conspirators used their positions of trust to learn sensitive, confidential procurement information, including procurement budgets for large U.S. government IT contracts. The co-conspirators used that inside information to craft bids at artificially determined, non-competitive and non-independent prices, ensuring Marquez’s company would win the procurement. 

    According to court documents, the co-conspirators shared their bids in advance of submitting them to the government, with one co-conspirator emailing that he would submit a “high price third bid.” Marquez and his co-conspirators submitted their collusive bids despite knowing the government sought independent, competitive bids for the valuable contracts, and despite Marquez’s certification of independent bidding.

    If convicted, Marquez faces maximum penalties of 20 years in prison for each conspiracy and wire fraud count and 10 years in prison for the major fraud charge. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    United States v. Breal L. Madison Jr.

    Breal L. Madison Jr., a Maryland resident, was charged in a 13-count indictment with conspiracy, bribery of a public official, mail fraud and money laundering for orchestrating a years-long scheme to defraud his employer and the United States out of over $7 million in connection with the sale of IT products to various government agencies.

    Brandon Scott Glisson, an IT contractor providing IT services to the U.S. government, and Glisson’s supervisor, Lawrence A. Eady, a former senior government employee, have also been charged for their respective roles in the scheme.

    According to court documents, through multiple misrepresentations, Madison and his co-conspirators conspired to steal money from Madison’s employer and government agencies, illegally siphoning over $9 million in stolen proceeds to Madison’s shell company, Trident Technology Solutions, and another shell company. They used the money to purchase luxury items and to pay approximately $630,000 in bribes to Eady in exchange for Eady’s ensuring the purchase of additional products sold by Madison. 

    Madison used his ill-gotten gains to buy a Vanquish VQ58 yacht, 2020 Lamborghini Huracan and multiple other vehicles, all of which the United States seeks to forfeit in the indictment. 

    If convicted, Madison faces maximum penalties of five years in prison for the conspiracy count, 15 years in prison for each bribery count, 20 years in prison for each mail fraud count and 10 years for each money laundering count. A federal district court judge will determine any sentence after considering the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and other statutory factors.

    The DCIS, the FBI Baltimore Field Office, CIA Office of Inspector General and NSA Office of Inspector General investigated the case.

    Acting Assistant Chief Michael Sawers and Trial Attorneys Zachary Trotter and Elizabeth French of the Antitrust Division’s Washington Criminal Section and Assistant U.S. Attorneys Aaron S.J. Zelinsky, Sean M. Delaney and Darren Gardner for the District of Maryland are prosecuting the case. 

    Anyone with information about this investigation or other procurement fraud schemes should notify the PCSF at www.justice.gov/atr/webform/pcsf-citizen-complaint. The Justice Department created the PCSF in November 2019. It is a joint law enforcement effort to combat antitrust crimes and related fraudulent schemes that impact government procurement, grant and program funding at all levels of government — federal, state and local. For more information, visit www.justice.gov/procurement-collusion-strike-force.

    An indictment is merely an allegation. All defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. 

    View the Rawls information.

    View the Eady information.

    View Reefe information.

    View the Glisson information.

    View the Madison indictment.

    View the Marquez indictment.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Governor Polis Highlights Colorado’s Leading Work to Save Coloradans Money on Energy Bills, Support Out of School Time that Helps Colorado Students Thrive, and Promote Civic Engagement at Front Range Community College

    Source: US State of Colorado

    ARVADA – Today, Governor Polis highlighted Colorado’s leadership in clean energy, investments in education, and promotion of healthy civic engagement for all Coloradans.

    The Governor took part in the Colorado Afterschool Partnership Fall Conference, to discuss Colorado’s work to support  out-of-school educators for their work to help Colorado students succeed . In 2023, Governor Polis signed a bipartisan law to make a major state investment in afterschool education opportunities to get every student on track to math proficiency. These investments provide support for math instruction and improvement for students in pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade.

    “Investing in our students’ success is an investment in our state’s future. I am grateful to all the educators across the state who work tirelessly to provide the support and instruction for Colorado students to succeed well beyond the classroom. No student should feel left behind, and afterschool programs are critical to ensure students thrive,” said Governor Polis.

    The Governor then participated virtually in the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission Conference focused on solutions for low-cost energy. Colorado’s energy sector is a model for the nation, creating jobs and strengthening the economy.

    “As Chair of the National Governors Association I work with Governors from across the country and aisle on the issues that matter most to the people we serve, and today I was glad to join my fellow Governors Stitt and Governor Dunleavy to discuss our work on energy, as well as Colorado’s national leadership on technologies that lower energy costs, protect our air quality, and ensure clean drinking water for all Coloradans,” said Governor Polis.

    Governor Polis also spoke at the Energy M&A and Financing Forum to promote Colorado’s nation leading work in innovative clean energy solutions, ranking 4th in cleantech employment, 2nd in the nation for electric vehicle sales, and 8th nationally for wind, solar, and storage.

    “In Colorado, we are taking a market-driven, sector-by-sector approach to improve air quality and reduce carbon emissions. By doing so, we are delivering real results while creating good-paying jobs and reducing costs for Colorado consumers,” said Governor Polis.

    Later today, the Governor will tour Northglenn City Hall, the first net-zero emissions municipal building in Colorado. New clean-energy buildings like this one are helping the state reach the goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions 50% by 2030. The State is proud to support the installation of nine public charging ports through the Charge Ahead Colorado grant program and eight charging ports for fleet vehicles through the Fleet-ZERO grant program at the Northglenn City Hall.

    “Colorado is leading the way in bringing more jobs, cleaner energy, and saving Coloradans money on energy bills. The Northglenn City Hall, the first net-zero municipal building in Colorado, is a reflection of how far Colorado has come in creating clean energy infrastructure that will help power a bright future for our state,” said Governor Polis.

    The Governor will take part in a discussion at Front Range Community College about the importance of civic engagement in Colorado at the News & Democracy Discussion Panel. The event invites leaders from across Colorado to partake in a panel discussion on the importance of free and fair elections.

    “Each of us has a role to play in building and sustaining a strong, healthy democracy. That’s what civic engagement is all about and thank you to Front Page for being an important part of the media ecosystem here in Colorado, and continuing to promote a Colorado for all,” said Governor Polis.

    ###
     

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Transcript – Ports Australia conference

    Source: Australian Ministers for Infrastructure and Transport

    **CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY**

    As always, I begin by acknowledging the Muwinina People as the custodians of this land. We acknowledge and pay our respects to all Tasmanian Aboriginal Communities.

    Tasmania is one of the most beautiful places in our nation and a fitting setting for the Ports Australia Conference.

    We recognise the ongoing custodianship that Indigenous Australians have shown towards these lands and I extend this respect to all First Nations people joining us today.

    Thank you as well to Mike for that kind introduction, and to Stewart, your Chair, thank you very much for the invitation and for all the work that you do throughout the course of the year.

    It is wonderful to see so many public and private leaders from around the world come together.

    I would also like to extend a particular welcome to the Minister for Infrastructure for the Kingdom of Tonga.

    Like Australia, your nation relies on shipping. It is wonderful to have you here.

    I also want to recognise Dr Patrick Verhoeven, the Managing Director of the International Association of Ports and Harbours, and Jens Meier, the CEO of Hamburg Port Authority, who have travelled such a long way.

    Your presence underlines the inherently global nature of this industry, and I hope you enjoy your time here in our beautiful country.

    This is in fact my second time in Tasmania in the last two weeks. 

    Last week I was in the north, this week I’m in the south.

    On both these visits, I have had the pleasure of engaging with Tasmania’s proud maritime industry.

    Last week, I was in Burnie to commission the new shiploader – a project which replaced an essential piece of infrastructure that had been in place for five decades.

    The new shiploader doubles the capacity of the old, and can serve ships up to Panamax size, creating local jobs and growing local industry.

    It is a project that pays tribute to both the maritime past and future of this great state, as well as setting the local economy up for decades of success to come.

    It also speaks to how essential maritime logistics are to our day-to-day lives.

    At the port I could see woodchips going to China, as well as cars and supermarket produce coming into the state.

    It is too easy to miss the magic that defines our modern world, but when you take even a moment to think about it, it is truly extraordinary. 

    That port in Burnie on the north coast of Tasmania is connected to a global network that stretches to every corner of our planet. 

    Everything that we rely on, relies in turn on shipping – which is why it is such a pleasure to be here today with some of the many, many hardworking people who underpin this essential industry.

    Events like these are key to fostering a strong, robust sector – and year after year, Ports Australia does a wonderful job bringing you together and advocating for your industry.

    I stand here today as a minister in a government that knows that ports are a primary driver of our economy and workforce. 

    As well as facilitating international trade and the movement of goods throughout the region, our ports are strategic assets and critical infrastructure.

    They are vital to sustaining our island nation. 

    The most recent report from Ports Australia shows exactly this. 

    Ports move an overwhelming 99 per cent of Australia’s international trade by volume, and importantly, over 694,000 local jobs are facilitated by Australia’s port activities. 

    This works out to a staggering one in every 20 jobs across the nation. 

    Container transport has seen a huge increase.

    As have vehicle imports. 

    The most recent numbers show that cruise ships have soared to 18% higher than pre-pandemic numbers.

    You take our goods to the world, and you bring the world to us.

    Of course, these numbers, while good news, bring pressures of their own. 

    This story of growth underlines the need to ensure that our infrastructure, our investments and our policies are positioned to support a sustainable, reliable and productive supply chain. 

    That’s why our government is making investments like those at the Port of Burnie, and it is also why my department led a review earlier this year into the national freight and supply chain strategy. 

    In total, 71 submissions were received from a variety of stakeholders, including from maritime and associated peak bodies.

    Of course, I acknowledge and thank Ports Australia for their submission and engagement throughout the Review process.  

    The review found that while the foundations of the strategy remain strong, productivity, resilience, decarbonisation and data should be strengthened in the strategy and new National Action Plan.

    We are already doing the work of refreshing the strategy and action plan to address the findings of the review, and I look forward to updating you further in due course.

    But, of course, the findings of the review touch on challenges that are faced across our entire economy and society – none more so than the need to act to mitigate climate change. 

    The Albanese Government is committed to reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 43% below 2005 levels by 2030 and to achieving net zero emissions by 2050. 

    Achieving these ambitious economy-wide targets will require concerted action across all sectors, including this one. 

    Right now, transport contributes 21 percent of Australia’s direct emissions. 

    Adding to that challenge, transport is one of the hardest sectors to abate.

    So, our work here is vital.

    That is why we released the Transport Net Zero Roadmap for consultation earlier this year. 

    While that roadmap covered all modes of transport, it was of particular importance for the maritime sector.

    As we know, decarbonisation will rely on a combination of low carbon liquid fuels (LCLFs), hydrogen, electrification and efficiency improvements.

    Of these, LCLFs offer the clearest pathway for decarbonisation within liquid fuel-reliant sectors that cannot readily electrify in the near-term. 

    This includes maritime, aviation, heavy vehicle and rail, as well as mining, manufacturing and agricultural sectors.

    The bad news is that we need a lot of liquid fuels, but the good news is that Australia is well-placed with comparative advantages in the production of LCLFs: 

    • We have rich renewable energy resources; 
    • We use advanced farming practices that embody low carbon emissions;  
    • We are able to achieve economies of scale;
    • We have significant refining and port infrastructure; 
    • And we have the ability to both enable and encourage domestic fuel consumption, as well as support export capability.

    As part of our Future Made in Australia agenda, the Government is fast-tracking support for an LCLF industry.

    The government announced $18.5 million as part of the recent Budget, to support a domestic LCLF industry through the development of a certification scheme for those fuels.

    And $1.7 billion over the next ten years will go towards a Future Made in Australia Innovation Fund.

    This funding will be used in part to support nascent LCLF production technologies through research and development, to help de-risk developments, and to attract private sector investment.

    And we will continue to work with industry on further steps as needed.

    By successfully building a local LCLF industry we will increase fuel security, strengthen regional economies, diversify income streams for farmers, and meet our decarbonisation objectives – it’s hard to find a bigger win-win than that. 

    To speak even more specifically to the challenges of this sector, we’ve created a Maritime Emission Reduction National Action Plan, the MERNAP for short.

    The MERNAP aims to support Australia’s national emissions reduction targets, contribute to the global decarbonisation of shipping, and future-proof the Australian maritime sector to avoid costly and disruptive transitions later, ensuring an equitable transition, particularly for the maritime workforce, safeguarding jobs and skills for the future.

    The vision is that by 2050, Australia will fully leverage the global maritime decarbonisation transition, benefiting our ports, vessels, and the broader energy sector. 

    This will showcase Australia’s unique comparative advantages while supporting a fair and balanced transition for the industry.

    The MERNAP Consultative Group has played a vital role in shaping this action plan, and I’d like to acknowledge those here today, including: Maritime Industry Australia Limited, the Maritime Union of Australia, and of course, Ports Australia.

    To support the development of MERNAP, we undertook extensive public consultations that revealed to us that the future of the maritime sector will be powered by multiple energy sources, all of which will require new skills, and see us facing new challenges around technology readiness for alternative fuels. 

    Safety, operational efficiencies, and strong partnerships across the value chain will be critical to driving this transition.

    The Albanese Government remains committed to ensuring that Australia’s maritime industry is prepared for the future, ready to contribute to our national emissions targets, and able to thrive in a decarbonised global economy – including through initiatives like Green Shipping Corridors – partnering with nations, such as New Zealand, Singapore and South Korea. 

    I have focused a lot on what fuels our maritime sector, but there is, of course, an even more important element – the people who run it.

    I am proud to say that our plan to establish a Strategic Fleet is underway. 

    This fleet will provide assistance in times of crisis, supply chain disruption, or natural disaster. And it will support industries reliant on shipping, such as heavy manufacturing.

    Tenders to participate in the Strategic Fleet Pilot will close on 29 November. 

    Through this process, three vessels that will be privately owned and commercially operated will be selected for the pilot. 

    This is a major step towards fulfilling our commitment to establish a Strategic Fleet of up to twelve Australian flagged and crewed vessels. 

    This will strengthen our sovereign maritime capabilities while supporting our maritime workforce. 

    The creation of a strategic fleet is a central government policy that will shape our workforce for decades to come. 

    I strongly encourage all interested parties to take part in this process and to consider what role they can play.

    The tender process is being managed by my Department, which is seeking innovative tenders that will deliver the objectives of the Pilot Program. 

    These include providing the Commonwealth with certainty of access to the strategic fleet, to move cargo in times of need, crisis or national emergency. And to support of the needs of Defence —including in training and logistical capacities.

    The Albanese Government is seeking to have pilot vessels on the water as soon as possible.

    While it is not a silver bullet to solve all of the issues of our current and emerging seafarer shortage, the Strategic Fleet and the work being undertaken by Industry Skills Australia through the Maritime Industry Workforce Plan, will support our maritime workforce by increasing the amount of Australian qualified seafarers at a time of a growing global shortage. 

    The independent reviews of the Shipping Registration Act and the Coastal Trading Act being conducted by Ms Lynelle Briggs AO and Emeritus Professor Nicholas Gaskell will also contribute to the modernisation of Australia’s shipping regulatory framework, ensuring the Acts are fit for purpose and support the long-term sustainability of an Australian Maritime Strategic Fleet, and the maritime industry more broadly. 

    Public consultation has commenced and I encourage you all to make your voices heard.

    As you can see, there is a lot to do in your sector and we are a government that is determined to get on with doing it.

    The reforms the Albanese Government is delivering will do our part to support a productive, resilient supply chain, while positioning Australia to thrive in the new net zero economy.

    Thank you for having me, and all the best with the rest of your conference.

    ENDS

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Call for information – Absconded prisoners – Alice Springs

    Source: Northern Territory Police and Fire Services

    Northern Territory Police are calling for information in relation to two 17-year-old males who absconded from the Alice Springs Youth Detention Centre last night.

    Around 6.00pm, police were notified that the pair had absconded from the Correctional facility and were seen heading into bushland in a north direction towards Alice Springs.

    An extensive search operation was launched involving members from the Dog Operations Unit, Drone Unit, and general duties officers.

    Around 9.40pm, a white Mazda 6 believed to be stolen earlier in the evening was sighted by police being driven dangerously by two youths. The vehicle allegedly attempted to engage with the police vehicle, before fleeing the area heading south out of Alice Springs. It was last sighted in the Ilparpa Road area, and both the Mazda and youths remain outstanding at this time. Police are investigating if the escapees were the youths driving the vehicle.

    Police do not believe they pose a risk to the public however advise not to approach them. Anyone with information about their location is urged to contact police on 131 444, quoting reference number NTP24000109358, or Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI Australia: Interview with Greg Jennett, Afternoon Briefing, ABC News

    Source: Australian Treasurer

    GREG JENNETT:

    In the fight against inflation and ever rising grocery prices, farmers have been caught in the middle of debate on the effect of pricing on customers. The Minister responsible for competition, Andrew Leigh, has been taking a close look at the farming sector. We spoke to him earlier. Andrew Leigh, good to have you back with us. Now, you’ve given a speech today on competition, pointing out that it’s definitely lacking in the agriculture or farming sector. They feel it in lots of ways, according to your presentation, through the harvesters, they buy and maintain seeds and spray that they put in the field and cattle they sell at the yard. So, you’ve highlighted it. What’s the solution?

    ANDREW LEIGH:

    Well, Greg, as you say, farmers are the meat in the market concentration sandwich. You often get a lot of farmers, but just a few suppliers, and just a few people they can sell to. Part of the answer is the Food and Grocery Code of Conduct being made mandatory rather than voluntary as it was under the Liberals and Nationals. That ensures that farmers get a fairer deal when they’re negotiating with supermarkets. Part of it is also about banning unfair contract terms, which we did when we came to office. Those unfair contract terms were hurting small farmers in areas like fertiliser contracts or potato grower retailing, and that ensures that the small guy gets a better deal.

    JENNETT:

    What’s the argument against strong entities with big networks of dealers, typically in small country towns. So, you might buy for instance, a John Deere tractor and sure you are completely tethered then to the local dealer, the local repairer, the software, they own, but around that sits local jobs as well. Why would you want to disrupt those big strong entities with their networks across the land?

    LEIGH:

    Well, the same argument was made with cars where dealers argued that only they should be able to fix their cars. But the decision that the parliament made, which I was pleased to kick off from July 2022, was that there ought to be a right to repair, a sharing of the information. These pieces of farm machinery are now incredibly advanced, John Deere has more software engineers than mechanical engineers on staff. And so we’re looking carefully at whether there ought to be a right to repair, whether it’s possible to in the first instance, strike an arrangement between those independent repairers and the farm suppliers and so anyone can fix their machinery if they have the right qualifications.

    JENNETT:

    Do they exist, these independent repairers, or exist in large enough number to make a difference?

    LEIGH:

    No, you go to exactly the right question, Greg. When you’re talking about independent mechanics, there’s thousands of them across the country. When you talk about independents to fix farm machinery, there’s fewer of them around. But the problem is really acute for farmers because if a harvester can’t operate for a week, that can be the difference of thousands of dollars in the price that the farmer receives. So, with that risk of spoilage, you do need to get a quicker fix and an independent repair sector may be part of the answer.

    JENNETT:

    Might it be necessary when you look at the conglomerates that make seed and sprays for agriculture – most of them are very large multinationals – might it be necessary to consider having a power to break them up?

    LEIGH:

    Look, we haven’t gone for divestment, but we are concerned about the degree of market concentration and that’s why we’ve introduced into parliament the biggest merger shake up in 50 years. Jim Chalmers introduced that in the parliament just in the last sittings. And that’s a really key part of economic reform for us, continuing the competition legacy of the Hawke and Keating governments.

    JENNETT:

    If you push this agenda all the way through in all the areas of agriculture that we’re discussing here, possible to estimate price reductions for consumers, those of us who buy food made by Australian farmers, grown by Australian farmers at Australian supermarkets?

    LEIGH:

    The best estimate we’ve got, Greg, is if we return the economy to the levels of competition that prevailed at the turn of the millennium, is that we’d boost GDP by somewhere between one and 3 per cent. That’s in line with estimates that suggested that the National Competition Policy reforms of the 1990s benefited the typical Australian by about 2.5 per cent. These are massive gains and they’re key in dealing with cost‑of‑living issues. [A lack of] competition drives down prices and drives up wages. It also reduces innovation and productivity if you have a lack of competition in the market. So, we need a more competitive and dynamic economy for our farmers and for people who work in other sectors.

    JENNETT:

    Inevitably, you touch on trade in your speech and there’s some big clouds sitting over global trade at the moment, principally from the United States. There’s an event happening there in a week’s time. If the US erects higher tariff walls, particularly on Chinese goods, with the suggestion from candidate Trump of a 60 per cent tariff. What do you estimate the effect on China’s demand for raw ingredients produced by Australia? How much could that drop off by virtue of a US tariff change?

    LEIGH:

    Australia has been a strong advocate of open markets and the Cairns Group of agricultural free trading nations was spearheaded by Australia in order to get a better deal at the World Trade Organisation. Obviously, the Americans will make their own decision. But I’m a passionate free trader because I believe that’s strongly in the interests of Australian consumers and producers. Our farmers in particular have benefited from freer trade and that old era of ‘protection all round’ meant that farmers paid too much for their machines and got too little for their exports as a result of retaliatory tariffs.

    JENNETT:

    Would there be a balancing out here? Sure. China’s demand under the scenario I’ve described, China’s demand for iron ore and coal might drop off because they’re selling fewer goods manufactured into the United States. But by the same token, goods already made need to go somewhere else. Could Australian consumers benefit by China offloading product that might otherwise have been intended for the United States?

    LEIGH:

    Greg, a medium‑sized economy that is engaged with the world like Australia, benefits when trade barriers are low. As Joan Robinson, the great Cambridge economist put it, it’s always worth taking the rocks out of your own harbours, better yet if your trading partners take the rocks out of theirs. So, our interest is strongly in a rules‑based trading system and in low tariffs around the world. Governments in Australia have consistently argued for that. It’s in the national interest and it boosts wages and means Australians get better prices for the goods they buy.

    JENNETT:

    So, are you nervous about what you’re hearing from political debate emanating from the US?

    LEIGH:

    Well, of course we’re all watching the US election and it’s a fascinating show every 4 years, but that’s a decision for the American people.

    JENNETT:

    All right, we might come back to that when we actually get a result in a week or so time. Andrew, one final one. Can’t let you go without asking because we’re asking almost everyone on travel. Would it be better if a blanket rule were put in place for politicians against airline upgrades pertaining to private or unofficial travel? I don’t mean work related travel, but private travel. Would it be cleaner if such a rule existed?

    LEIGH:

    Look, I’d certainly be relaxed about that, Greg. I’m somebody who flies most of my domestic flights economy rather than business. That’s meant that in the past from time ‑to‑time I’ve received upgrades. Doesn’t happen if you book business. But of course that then means the taxpayer’s paying twice as much.

    JENNETT:

    Ever been upgraded on personal travel unexpectedly?

    LEIGH:

    It’s happened to me before. You don’t ask for it, and it’s not something that’s ever changed my decision. I don’t think there’s anyone who’s been as vociferous a critic of Qantas in the parliament as me. I’ve been very strongly critical of their cancellations of Sydney‑Canberra flights and a strong advocate of more competition in the aviation sector. Indeed, I gave a speech on it recently.

    JENNETT:

    Ok, so just to be clear, any personal upgrade you believe was unconnected to your line of work as a politician? Because that’s the grey line here around the Anthony Albanese episodes, isn’t it?

    LEIGH:

    Yeah. I have no idea on what basis they make those decisions. Certainly, I report as the Prime Minister has done, and it’s never affected my decisions. I’ll continue to be a strong advocate for more competition in the aviation sector.

    JENNETT:

    Understood. You certainly have been that. Andrew Leigh, we thank you, as always.

    MIL OSI News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: REMINDER: SH2 resurfacing through Dannevirke gets underway

    Source: New Zealand Transport Agency

    A reminder that resurfacing takes place this week on a stretch of State Highway 2 (SH2) in Dannevirke.

    This asphalt resurfacing work has begun today, on SH2 Stanley Street, between Denmark Street and Miller Street and will take 4 days.

    During day-time work hours, a detour will be in place for northbound traffic; southbound traffic will continue to flow freely on SH2. The detour is suitable for all vehicle types.

    Crews will be working from 6.30am to 5pm each day between Tuesday 29 October and Friday 1 November (weather permitting).

    During these work hours, northbound traffic will be detoured via Rawhiti Street, Queen Street, Allan Street and onto Cole Street, before rejoining SH2.

    A temporary speed limit of 30km/h will be in place for southbound traffic near the worksite. Outside of work hours, SH2 will be open with a reduced speed limit in place.

    This resurfacing work will improve the durability and long-term condition of this section of road. A one-way daytime closure allows crews to complete the work as efficiently and safely as possible while keeping traffic moving, and minimising ongoing disruption and long delay times.

    Resident and business access remains and northbound road users are advised to follow the detour to get to your destination. The detour is expected to add less than 5 minutes to journey times.  

    Other works underway or coming up on SH2

    • State Highway 2, resealing: Maintenance works are taking place near Tamaki River Rd from  today (29 October) til 15 November, between 6am – 7pm each day. Daytime stop/go will be in place.
    • State Highway 2, rebuild:Crews are starting rebuild works on SH2 north of Ball Rd, between Woodville and Dannevirke, slightly earlier than expected from today (29 October). It’s expected to take 4-5 weeks. Daytime stop/go will be in place.
    • State Highway 2, resurfacing: Asphalting works are underway on SH2 near the Mangatera Stream Bridge, north of Dannevirke. Stop/go is in place at night, with works expected to finish on Saturday 12 October.
    • State Highway 2, rebuild: From 31 October – 28 November, road rebuild work will take place on SH2 in Papatawa, north of Ball Road, between Woodville and Dannevirke. Daytime stop/go will be in place.

    For more information about the 2024/2025 road maintenance season, please visit:

    NZTA’s Manawatū-Whanganui maintenance and operations webpage

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: South Sudan

    Source: New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade – Safe Travel

    • Reviewed: 30 October 2024, 14:28 NZDT
    • Still current at: 30 October 2024

    Related news features

    If you are planning international travel at this time, please read our COVID-19 related travel advice here, alongside our destination specific travel advice below.

    Do not travel to South Sudan due to ongoing armed conflict, inter-ethnic violence and violent crime (level 4 of 4).

    New Zealanders currently in South Sudan are advised to depart as soon as it is safe to do so.

    South Sudan

    Armed Conflict/Civil Unrest
    Pockets of armed conflict between government and various opposition forces remain and the security situation in Juba has the potential to deteriorate with little or no warning. Land routes into and out of South Sudan may be blocked and flights may be cancelled at short notice. The political and security situation throughout South Sudan remains volatile.

    Inter-ethnic violence and cattle raiding continues to occur throughout the country, with significant loss of life. There is a complete absence of rule of law outside of the capital Juba and even in Juba, the capacity of the authorities to uphold law and order is very limited.

    Areas within 40 kilometres of South Sudan’s northern border with Sudan are also particularly dangerous and vulnerable to armed incursions and violence.  Parts of the border remain disputed and military forces are deployed in these areas.

    The border areas with South Sudan’s other neighbouring countries, including Ethiopia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kenya, the Central African Republic, and Uganda are extremely dangerous due to armed conflict, military activity and other violence. There are regular reports of attacks by armed groups on vehicles travelling on the main road connecting Juba to Uganda (Jiba-Niomule road).

    We recommend you avoid all protests, demonstrations and large public gatherings in South Sudan as they have the potential to turn violent with little warning. Monitor local and international media, review personal security plans and be aware of your surroundings.

    Violent Crime
    Violent crime, including kidnapping, murder, armed robbery, home invasions, car-jacking, and sexual assault is a significant problem throughout South Sudan, both in urban and rural areas. The economic situation has led to a significant increase in both petty and violent crime. Criminals are often armed as weapons are readily accessible.

    The government has limited capacity to deter crime and maintain law and order throughout South Sudan. Banditry and lawlessness is an issue in rural areas. Humanitarian workers have been the targets of killings and violence in the past.

    New Zealanders in South Sudan should exercise a very high degree of personal security awareness at all times. No resistance should be given if you are the victim of an armed robbery or carjacking as this could lead to an escalation in violence. For security reasons we recommend against travelling alone, at night, or to isolated areas.

    Petty crime, such as bag snatching and pickpocketing, also occurs and is often accompanied by violence. We advise New Zealanders to be alert to their surroundings at all times and take steps to safeguard and secure their personal belongings. 

    Road Travel
    We strongly advise against using public transport due to safety concerns.

    If travelling by road, car doors should be locked and windows up.

    Official checkpoints are frequently set up by security forces and have been known to become hostile or violent. Individuals staffing checkpoints have been known to solicit bribes. Criminals who pose as police officers have also set up roadblocks. At checkpoints, remain in your vehicle and produce requested documents through a raised window. We recommend carrying colour photocopies of your passport and identity documents and producing these when requested, not the originals.

    Landmines
    There is a risk from landmines, which are reportedly present throughout South Sudan, including in Juba. We advise you not to stray off well-used public roads and paths.

    General Travel Advice
    As there is no New Zealand diplomatic presence in South Sudan, the ability of the government to assist New Zealand citizens is severely limited. We offer advice to New Zealanders about contingency planning that travellers to South Sudan should consider.

    We advise New Zealanders in South Sudan to be vigilant and take appropriate precautions to ensure their safety, including by seeking professional security advice. You should have a contingency plan in place for departure, monitor developments closely through the media and other local information sources. As a precautionary measure, we recommend ensuring adequate supplies of food, water, fuel, cash and essential medications are always on hand and travel documents are kept up to date.

    New Zealanders travelling or living in South Sudan should have a comprehensive travel insurance policy in place that includes provision for medical evacuation by air.  You should check that your travel insurance policy covers travel to South Sudan – exclusions may well apply. Only very limited medical facilities are available in South Sudan. 

    The rainy season typically runs from April to November, during which flooding often occurs. Flooding impacts transport and communications infrastructure, as well as lead to shortages of drinking water and food. Severe flooding has led to displacement, property damage and loss of life.

    Penalties for possession, use or trafficking of illegal drugs are severe and can include the death penalty.

    New Zealanders are advised to respect religious, social and cultural traditions in South Sudan to avoid offending local sensitivities. Modesty and discretion is recommended for both dress and behaviour.

    Photography, including from a mobile phone, without a permit from the Ministry of Information in South Sudan is illegal. Taking photographs without a permit will immediately attract suspicion, and could lead to detention. Even with a permit, it is illegal to take photos of airfields, military installations or personal, government buildings and infrastructure.

    New Zealanders who decide to live or travel in South Sudan against our advice are strongly encouraged to register their details with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade.

     

    Travel tips

    See our regional advice for Africa

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Senators Reverend Warnock, Ossoff Announce Over $48 Million in Federal Funding for Clean Energy Upgrades at Savannah, Brunswick Ports 

    US Senate News:

    Source: United States Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock – Georgia

    Senators Reverend Warnock, Ossoff Announce Over $48 Million in Federal Funding for Clean Energy Upgrades at Savannah, Brunswick Ports 

    Federal funds made possible by the Inflation Reduction Act, championed by Georgia’s U.S. Senators for its investments in Georgia’s clean energy economy
    Georgia Ports Authority to receive over $48 million to install new electric charging infrastructure for ships at the Port of Savannah and the Port of Brunswick
    Senator Reverend Warnock penned a letter of support for GPA’s bid to receive federal funding for clean energy infrastructure upgrades
    In addition to boosting the local economy, this grant will result in less smog from diesel emissions for surrounding port communities, strengthening air quality and the health of dock workers 
    Earlier this year, Georgia’s U.S. Senators announced over $15 million in clean energy and infrastructure investments for the Port of Savannah
    Senator Reverend Warnock: “As a son of coastal Georgia, I know the importance of Georgia’s ports and its workers to our state and national economies. As we continue moving toward a clean energy economy, it is critical Georgia and its workers remain on the frontlines of these federal investments and reap the benefits of our hard work in Washington”
    Senator Ossoff: “Today we are delivering new resources through the EPA’s Clean Ports program to upgrade the Port of Savannah and the Port of Brunswick with vessel shore power systems and install new electric charging infrastructure. This is a win-win for our economy and for local communities”

    Washington, D.C. —  Today, U.S. Senators Reverend Raphael Warnock (D-GA), a member of the Senate Commerce committee charged with overseeing the nation’s transportation policies, and Jon Ossoff (D-GA) announced they secured $48,763,746 to install new electric charging infrastructure for ships at the Port of Savannah and the Port of Brunswick. The funding will go to the Georgia Ports Authority (GPA) to invest in the vessel shore power systems, which will allow ships to ‘plug-in’ to electric grid power and turn off diesel engines while at port. In addition, the project includes the scrappage and replacement of diesel terminal tractors with new electric terminal tractors. GPA plans to engage with communities through their network and conduct classroom and on-the-job training for workers related to shore power, zero-emission vehicles, and charging stations. In addition to boosting the local economy, this grant will result in less smog from diesel emissions for surrounding port communities, helping enhance overall quality of life. The decrease in diesel emissions will also strengthen air quality, and in turn, the health of dock workers spending long hours keeping our ports running. This latest investment reflects both senators’ commitment to bolstering Georgia’s clean energy infrastructure, helping Georgia’s ports maintain their competitive edge in the U.S. economy, and ensuring workers receive the support and training needed in an evolving economy. 

    “As a son of coastal Georgia, I know the importance of Georgia’s ports and its workers to our state and national economies. As we continue moving toward a clean energy economy, it is critical Georgia and its workers remain on the frontlines of these federal investments and reap the benefits of our hard work in Washington, which is why I was proud to champion this award for the Georgia Ports Authority,” said Senator Reverend Warnock. “Senator Ossoff and I will continue delivering investments for Georgia’s ports to keep our state at the forefront of the nation’s clean energy economy.”

    “Senator Warnock and I continue working to upgrade Georgia’s port infrastructure and establish Georgia as the national leader in advanced energy technology. Today we are delivering new resources through the EPA’s Clean Ports program to upgrade the Port of Savannah and the Port of Brunswick with vessel shore power systems and install new electric charging infrastructure. This is a win-win for our economy and for local communities,” said Senator Ossoff.

    The latest announcement is part of a larger set of awards unveiled by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency that includes 55 applicants across 27 states and territories to receive nearly $3 billion through EPA’s Clean Ports Program. The grants are funded by the Inflation Reduction Act—the largest investment in combating climate change and promoting clean energy in history, and legislation only made possible by Georgia voters electing Senators Warnock and Ossoff to cast the decisive votes—and will advance environmental justice by reducing diesel air pollution in U.S. ports and surrounding communities while promoting good-paying and union jobs that help America’s ports thrive.

    A longtime advocate for strong federal funding for Georgia’s ports, this latest effort follows Senator Warnock’s bipartisan, bicameral push with Georgia’s full congressional delegation urging officials to study expanding the Port of Savannah to ensure it can continue accommodating increasingly large container vessels. Earlier this year, Senators Warnock and Ossoff announced over $15 million in clean energy and infrastructure investments for the Port of Savannah. Also this year, Senator Warnock successfully secured $11.3 million for the Brunswick Harbor through the FY ’24 government funding bill for modifications to improve the efficiency, cost and reliability of ship traffic in the harbor, as well as $44.7 million for the Savannah Harbor to support operations and maintenance. Additionally, in January 2024, Senators Warnock and Ossoff announced a $15 million federal grant to the Port of Brunswick for critical infrastructure upgrades, funded through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law championed by both Georgia senators.

    In May 2023, Sen. Ossoff and EPA Administrator visited the Port of Savannah to announce the Clean Ports Program and the availability of funding to electrify transportation and logistics to reduce air pollution.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI China: China’s pickup truck sales up 3% in September

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    Sales of pickup trucks in China rose 3 percent year on year in September, driven by surging market demand, industry data showed Tuesday.

    Some 45,000 pickup trucks were sold in the country last month, surging 17 percent month on month, according to the China Passenger Car Association (CPCA).

    The exports of such vehicles accounted for 52 percent of the country’s total pickup truck sales, or 27 percent of overall truck sales, the CPCA data revealed.

    The robust demand in overseas markets has promoted the continued growth of China’s pickup truck exports since 2022, the CPCA said.

    In the first three quarters of the year, China’s pickup truck sales reached 386,000 units, up 2 percent year on year.

    However, pickup truck production in the country fell by 4.5 percent year on year in September to 42,900 units, the data showed.

    The performance of the domestic pickup market remained relatively stable, according to the CPCA.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Equipment makers, high-tech lift power

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    Driven by the rapid development of the high-tech and equipment manufacturing sectors, China saw its electricity consumption, a key barometer of economic activity, rise 7.9 percent year-on-year in the first three quarters, said the China Electricity Council.

    Electricity consumption in the two key sectors grew 11.4 percent year-on-year during the period, a 1.3 percentage point increase from the same period last year, said Jiang Debin, deputy director of the council’s statistics and data center.

    Soaring electricity consumption in these advanced sectors and the production of specialized equipment and machinery reflect an ongoing trend of transformation and upgrade within manufacturing, Jiang said.

    High-tech and equipment manufacturing sectors include areas involved in electronics, aerospace, robotics, precision machinery and other high-value tech-intensive manufacturing activities. These sectors typically require advanced engineering, specialized manufacturing techniques, and often high levels of automation to meet the demands for quality and precision.

    Within these key sectors, electrical machinery and equipment manufacturing led with a robust 19.1 percent increase, while computers, communications and electronics equipment manufacturing saw a 14.4 percent uptick. Instrumentation manufacturing followed closely behind, posting an 11.6 percent rise, and the auto industry grew by 11.1 percent, said the council.

    In a sign of the growing emphasis on renewable energy, electricity consumption for photovoltaic equipment and component manufacturing surged 36.2 percent compared to last year. Additionally, wind power equipment production in the general equipment sector climbed 19.6 percent, underscoring China’s commitment to supporting green technology development as part of its broader industrial upgrade, it said.

    Jiang said that driven by mobile internet, big data and cloud computing sectors, electricity consumption for internet data services also increased 24.4 percent year-on-year during the first nine months.

    The rapid growth of electric vehicles, meanwhile, led to a 56.7 percent year-on-year increase in electricity consumption for charging and battery swapping services, he said.

    Analysts say that given the country’s ambitious targets of peaking carbon emissions before 2030 and achieving carbon neutrality before 2060, the power sector is likely to keep investing in the development of new energy sources.

    The energy sector is poised to accelerate investment in new energy sources, driven by the strong policy support for renewable energy as solar and wind power remain central to reducing emissions across the grid, said Wang Lining, director of the oil market department of the Economics and Technology Research Institute under China National Petroleum Corp.

    As these technologies mature, we’re likely to see power consumption being increasingly driven by the expansion of these sectors and the transition will fuel substantial infrastructure investment, Wang said.

    Lin Boqiang, head of the China Institute for Studies in Energy Policy at Xiamen University, said solar and wind are expected to be major growth engines in the next decade with continuous investment in the power sector.

    “As these investments intensify, the energy sector will need to develop robust power storage solutions and grid modernization efforts to support an influx of intermittent renewable sources, paving the way for a more resilient and greener energy landscape, Lin said.

    The council said earlier that total electricity consumption is expected to grow by approximately 6.5 percent year-on-year in 2024.

    According to the council, power investment continues to grow rapidly, with new wind and solar power installations reaching a combined 200 gigawatts, accounting for over 80 percent of total newly installed capacity.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI China: Norwegians optimistic about opportunities at CIIE

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    A truck loaded with exhibits for the upcoming 7th China International Import Expo (CIIE) is greeted with a water salute during an accession ceremony for exhibits at the National Exhibition and Convention Center (Shanghai), the main venue for the CIIE, in east China’s Shanghai, Oct. 22, 2024. [Photo/Xinhua]

    As the 7th China International Import Expo (CIIE) approaches, Henning Kristoffersen, head of Innovation Norway in China, expressed optimism about growing opportunities for Norwegian businesses to deepen presence in Chinese market in a recent interview with Xinhua.

    Highlighting last year’s participation of Norwegian companies in the CIIE, Kristoffersen, also commercial counselor of the Norwegian Embassy in Beijing, said the event had provided a valuable platform for the businesses, particularly those in nutrition and health sectors, to showcase their products.

    They have realized that the CIIE is “an excellent arena to highlight their innovations,” he said.

    This year, Norway will participate in the Country Exhibition for the first time, hosting a variety of activities aimed at engaging with Chinese consumers and stakeholders.

    “This year marks the 70th anniversary of diplomatic relations between Norway and China … As ocean nations, maritime and marine sectors present substantial opportunities for both countries,” Kristoffersen said, adding, “We also look forward to increased cooperation in research and development.”

    Kristoffersen expressed belief that China will offer significant opportunities for Norwegian businesses in its promotion of green transition and innovation-driven growth.

    Sigmund Bjorgo, Norwegian Seafood Council’s country director to China, emphasized the importance of the CIIE as a major meeting point for Norwegian seafood companies to connect with industry stakeholders and consumers.

    “The CIIE has become an essential event for the Norwegian seafood industry. Being part of the Country Exhibition this year will elevate our profile and help us expand our presence in the Chinese market,” Bjorgo told Xinhua.

    Expressing confidence in the Chinese market, Bjorgo, who had previously served in the same position, said, “The growth of Norwegian seafood exports has been impressive, particularly for salmon, which has grown fivefold since 2018.”

    The 7th CIIE, scheduled to be held in Shanghai from Nov. 5 to 10, has attracted participants from 152 countries, regions and international organizations, and achieved a new record with 297 Fortune Global 500 companies and industry leaders set to attend.

    Since its first edition in 2018, this expo has become an important stage spotlighting China’s new development paradigm, a platform for high-level opening up, and a public good for the whole world.

    The previous six editions saw nearly 2,500 new products, technologies and services make their debuts, with combined intended turnover reaching over 420 billion U.S. dollars.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Security: Remarks by Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen H. Hicks at the 2024 Microelectronics Commons Annual Meeting (As Delivered)

    Source: United States INDO PACIFIC COMMAND

    Good morning, everybody. Thank you, Dr. [Dev] Shenoy, first, for the introduction, and thanks to all of you in the defense research and engineering enterprise, for what you do every day to lead us.

    It’s a privilege to be with all of you for this second annual meeting of the Microelectronics Commons. And it’s remarkable to see how much this community has flourished in just the past year.

    Now, I won’t bother preaching to this choir about why semiconductors matter. Whether you found religion lately or long ago, you’re all here because you get it.

    Yet even people who can fully grasp how chips enable our phones, fridges, cars, and so much of what’s essential to modern life — even scientists and technologists who are steeped in the intricacies of how they’re made — even they may not always consider why chips might be so important to the U.S. Department of Defense.

    But over at the Pentagon, we think about that all the time. Because microelectronics are fundamental to the operation of virtually every military system: ships, planes, tanks, long-range munitions, communication gear, satellites, sensors, and more.

    Every day, from the Indo-Pacific to the North Atlantic to the Middle East and beyond — from the ocean floor to outer space to cyberspace — as American warfighters stand the watch, they depend on chips to help them defend our country, our allies and partners, and our interests.

    Microelectronics are at the heart of practically everything you can imagine U.S. troops using. Radios. Radar. Night-vision goggles. GPS. Battle networks. Avionics that enable dagger-shaped stealth bombers to fly. WiFi.

    America’s vibrant innovation ecosystem made it all possible, through collaboration going back decades across government, academia, and industry, encompassing businesses large and small.

    You are the heirs to that legacy. And as our nation has embarked on a quest to reignite U.S. leadership in not only chip research and design, but also prototyping, manufacturing, and production at scale, you are cementing your own legacy.

    And you’ve already done a lot.

    One year ago, shortly after we announced the first Microelectronics Commons awards, we had more than 360 distinct member organizations located across 35 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. And we thought that was pretty impressive.

    But as of today, the Commons boasts over 1,200 member organizations. Meaning this community has more than tripled in size, in just 12 months. Now that’s really impressive. And with that growth, our reach has expanded to even more states, like Arkansas, Maine, Nevada, and Wisconsin.

    One year ago, we’d already awarded nearly $240 million to stand up eight regional innovation hubs, reflecting the talent and ingenuity resident all over the country. And that was just the beginning.

    Because, as of today, we’ve awarded nearly $700 million toward this endeavor’s goal of bridging the microelectronics gap from lab-to-fab — that infamous valley of death between research and development and production.

    Not only does that number include the latest round of nearly three dozen project awards announced just a few weeks ago- it also represents a tripling of our total investment. And there will be more to come.

    The CHIPS and Science Act is a “once-in-a-generation investment in America itself,” as President Biden said when he signed it into law.

    CHIPS was a bipartisan victory for U.S. national security and economic security — a win that will echo through history for years to come.

    It proved that we can still do big things, that our best days are still ahead — sparking programs and initiatives across the Biden-Harris Administration, and across the Department of Defense, where we work closely with the Department of Commerce and many other interagency colleagues on CHIPS implementation.

    The CHIPS Act made clear to America — and the world — that the U.S. government is united in its commitment to ensuring that our industrial and scientific powerhouses can deliver what we need to secure the future.

    And we’re united beyond the U.S. government.

    Take industry: right now we’re living through an era in which a new generation of defense-tech startups and scale-ups is disrupting America’s defense industrial base. That’s welcomed, because competition is good for the taxpayer and good for the warfighter.

    So you might expect to see the newcomers and the mainstays always eying each other warily, contesting whose products are better, and rarely collaborating or finding common cause.

    Yet that’s not the case with our regional innovation hubs in the Northeast, Midwest, and Southwest. They’ve given a home to both traditional primes, such as Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and RTX, and newer venture-backed companies, like Anduril, Epirus, and Tignis.

    Why? Because chips bring America together.

    Or take academia. Right now, in the midst of college football season, fans might expect the likes of Purdue, Notre Dame, Michigan, and Illinois Urbana-Champaign to be at each other’s throats well into January.

    But at the Silicon Crossroads hub, all four of those universities are benefitting from a trusted environment that’s fostering collaborative innovation — creating a unified research and prototyping capability where they’re accelerating their unique nanofabrication and test facilities for industry to access.

    And you could even say that the Midwest Microelectronics Consortium hub is like the Big Ten Conference, but for semiconductors. (Laughter.) It’s now the largest hub with over 360 members nationwide, hailing from every time zone in the continental United States: Pacific, Mountain, Central, and Eastern. There’s even one hub member in Hawaii. 

    Why? Because chips bring America together.

    Look no further than the Defense-Ready Electronics and Microdevices Superhub, which recently began processing its first outside customer orders. With the nickname “California DREAMS,” it has members from Pasadena, L.A., San Diego, and Santa Barbara — but it also has members from Baltimore, Maryland; Greensboro, North Carolina; and Fort Worth, Texas.

    Like I said, chips bring America together. And this work is expanding opportunity as it does so — broadening the number of people and places that support our growing national semiconductor ecosystems, building the workforce pools and talent pipelines that America needs to stay ahead, and bringing new hotbeds of local innovation into the fold.

    That’s you. You’re doing this.

    At hubs in Massachusetts and New York, you’re helping prepare military veterans for careers in microelectronics.

    And you’re also reaching talent at historically-black colleges and universities, like Morgan State University and North Carolina A&T, advancing areas like electromagnetic warfare, 5G and 6G wireless, and commercial leap-ahead technologies.

    Across the country, this network of hubs now represents a committed community — of innovators, transition owners, academic leaders, defense industry stakeholders, government program managers, and prototyping and manufacturing facilities, that are together accelerating microelectronics development and production — all to meet DoD’s needs, and many with dual-use applications.

    It’s been exciting to see our vision for the Microelectronics Commons become a reality over the last year. And we’re looking forward to the progress that we’ll see in the years to come: as the hubs continue to evolve their operational models, as new projects get awarded and funded, and as our investments deliver for the warfighter at greater speed and scale.

    Together, you exemplify what America can do when we’re faced with a pressing challenge.

    You’re showing the world — and especially our strategic competitors — what we’re capable of.

    And I know you won’t let us down.

    Thank you.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-Evening Report: Martha Stewart paved the way for influencers. But not everyone finds her brand empowering

    Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Di Yang, Doctoral student, School of Economics, Finance, and Marketing, RMIT University

    From showing us how to cook the perfect turkey to mastering the art of folding a fitted sheet, Martha Stewart’s name has long been a byword for doing things well at home – “how very ‘Martha Stewart’ of you”.

    New Netflix documentary, Martha, promises insights into her extraordinary life – from a teenage model to the original influencer and America’s first self-made female billionaire, with a prison stay and friendship with Snoop Dogg along the way.

    Behind the expertly folded linens and immaculately set tables lies something more.

    Martha Stewart created a brand empire that redefined the domestic lifestyle, monetised it and paved the way for others.

    Beginnings and barriers

    Stewart’s connection to the domestic arts began early.

    Raised in New Jersey, she learned essential homemaking skills like cooking and sewing from her mother, while her father introduced her to gardening.

    She studied art and architectural history yet Stewart started her career as a stockbroker. But her passion for the domestic realm led her to entrepreneurship.

    As she once reflected, “the life of the homemaker was more interesting to me than the life of Wall Street”.

    In 1972, she launched a catering business from the suburbs of Connecticut. It soon gained recognition for its elegant food presentations. A publisher client led to her 1982 book, Entertaining. It included notes for how to prepare a clambake for 30, a cocktail party for 200 and ranked presentation as highly as the food itself.

    Book success sealed a partnership with Kmart in 1987 and eventually took her homewares brand into millions of American homes.

    By 1999, she took her company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (which encompassed her television show, magazines, websites and merchandising product lines) public, becoming America’s first self-made female billionaire – albeit momentarily.

    A few years later, Stewart was embroiled in scandal. She received a five-month prison sentence for insider trading and obstruction of justice. Many expected this to mark the end of her career – but Stewart defied the odds.

    Breaking new ground

    After her release from prison, she didn’t shy away from her past. Instead, she continued sharing skills including those she honed during her time at prison camp – whether it was crocheting or experimenting with new recipes. As always, Stewart seized every opportunity to expand her brand.

    Her genius lies in her ability to “sense a void in the culture” and turn a personal touch into commercial success.

    Since selling her namesake brand, Stewart has stayed in the spotlight, sometimes sharing it with rapper Snoop Dogg. The unlikely duo struck up a seemingly genuine friendship that produced a television potluck series, appearances and prison jokes.

    She continues to connect with millions of followers on platforms like Instagram and TikTok, where her long-term influence is perhaps most evident.

    The OG influencer

    Stewart’s living legacy is unmistakable in today’s digital world. Scrolling through social media, you’ll find traces of her in meticulously arranged tablescapes or perfectly organised cabinets.

    Popular “cleanfluencers” like Mrs Hinch and Australia’s Mama Mila have built massive followings by turning domestic tasks into visually captivating content.

    Minimalist tidy maven Marie Kondo took the world by storm, with her philosophy of keeping only what “sparks joy”. Her global brand follows Stewart’s signature collection model. Stewart’s clean and white aesthetic and multichannel branding can be seen in Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop too.

    When housework is repackaged as life-changing and transformative, it transcends private duty to become a public, respected and potentially profitable business.

    But is this feminism?

    Yet, the rise of domestic lifestyle influencers also raises critical questions in feminist circles.

    As far back as Simone de Beauvoir’s The Second Sex, published in 1949, housework has been seen as part of the trap of domestic femininity.

    Figures like Stewart may represent success stories in economic terms. But their ventures risk reinforcing the stereotype that homemaking is inherently women’s work, often packaged alongside an ever-growing array of consumer products designed to perfect it.

    Stewart’s vision of domestic success – immaculate homes, flawless dinners, and perfect organisation – sets a standard that is unattainable for most. Scholars argue her media empire presents an upper-class fantasy, where the appearance of a wealthy lifestyle is emphasised over the reality of it.

    Focusing on domesticity is not inherently regressive, but what happens when the standards of success are too high to reach?

    The “solution” is often hidden in the consumerism trap, with women endlessly buying goods to chase an idealised lifestyle.

    Stewart’s embrace of perfectionism fuelled her success. In her words, “being a perfectionist can be profitable”. Yet for women and consumers, the pursuit of “Martha Stewartness” often feels out of reach.

    Martha is streaming on Netflix from today.

    Di Yang does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Martha Stewart paved the way for influencers. But not everyone finds her brand empowering – https://theconversation.com/martha-stewart-paved-the-way-for-influencers-but-not-everyone-finds-her-brand-empowering-241802

    MIL OSI AnalysisEveningReport.nz

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Gang member arrested after homemade firearm located

    Source: New Zealand Police (National News)

    Attributable to Senior Sergeant Aimee Whitley, Hamilton City Area Response Manager:

    Two people, including a gang member, have been arrested and a homemade firearm seized following an incident in Hillcrest, Hamilton.

    Around 2pm yesterday, Police responded to Masters Avenue following a report of a disorder involving a firearm. No-one was injured.

    A person believed to be in possession of a firearm left the scene in a vehicle.

    Police swiftly responded, armed as a precaution, searching the Hillcrest area and locating the vehicle of interest further down Masters Avenue.

    The vehicle was stopped and two people from the vehicle were arrested without incident.

    A small home-made pistol, capable of firing .22 calibre rounds, was located and seized, along with 203 grams of cannabis also located in the vehicle.

    A 30-year-old Waikato man is due to appear in the Hamilton District Court on Friday 1 November on charges of unlawfully possessing a firearm and unlawfully possessing ammunition.

    A 23-year-old Waikato man is due to appear in the Hamilton District Court on Tuesday 5 November on a charge of possessing a cannabis plant.

    Thanks to the detailed and prompt report made by a member of the public, Police were able to swiftly locate the vehicle of interest, taking one more firearm off the street.

    Police work hard to hold offenders to account, especially those with the potential to cause serious harm in our communities, such as those unlawfully in the possession of firearms, or those who take it upon themselves to craft homemade firearms.

    Homemade firearms have the potential to cause serious harm, not only to officers and the community but also to those using them.

    If you witness any unlawful activity and it is happening now, please contact Police on 111 as soon as possible with as much information as possible, including descriptions of the offenders, their vehicles, and what direction they may have travelled in.

    Information can also be reported to Police online or by calling 105.

    Alternatively you can report any information anonymously via Crime Stoppers on 0800 555 111.

    ENDS

    Issued by Police Media Centre

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI China: China expresses disapproval for EU’s tariff ruling over Chinese EVs

    Source: China State Council Information Office

    China-made new energy vehicles await shipment to Europe in Xiamen, Fujian province. [Photo/Xinhua]

    China does not approve of or accept the European Commission’s decision to impose extra tariffs on China-made electric vehicles, a spokesperson with the Ministry of Commerce said on Wednesday.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: LCQ21: Illegal carriage of passengers for reward by van-type light goods vehicles and cross-boundary private cars

    Source: Hong Kong Government special administrative region

    LCQ21: Illegal carriage of passengers for reward by van-type light goods vehicles and cross-boundary private cars
    LCQ21: Illegal carriage of passengers for reward by van-type light goods vehicles and cross-boundary private cars
    ******************************************************************************************

         ​Following is a question by the Hon Andrew Lam and a written reply by the Secretary for Transport and Logistics, Mr Lam Sai-hung, in the Legislative Council today (October 30): Question:      The Government released in July this year the preliminary findings on the study on combating illegal carriage of passengers for hire or reward and regulation of online hire car hailing platforms. In this connection, will the Government inform this Council: (1) whether the aforesaid study has covered any study on the operation mode of illegal carriage of passengers for reward by van-type light goods vehicles (vans) and cross-boundary private cars (PCs); if so, of the preliminary findings, and whether any conclusion has been drawn on the factors affecting the regulation of online hailed cars; if not, the reasons for not including such study; (2) of the number of prosecutions and convictions involving illegal carriage of passengers for reward by vans in the past three years, and the penalty imposed in each of the convicted cases; (3) of the number of prosecutions and convictions involving illegal carriage of passengers for reward by cross-boundary PCs in the past three years, and the penalty imposed in each of the convicted cases; whether any unlawful employment was involved in such cases; if so, of the number; and (4) of the number of cross-boundary PCs in Hong Kong that may legally carry passengers for hire or reward; whether there are any measures to combat illegal carriage of passengers for reward by cross-boundary PCs? Reply: President,      Having consulted the Transport Department (TD), the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) and the Immigration Department, our reply to various parts of the question raised by the Hon Andrew Lam is as follows: (1) The Government strives to enhance personalised point-to-point transport services. As reported to the Panel on Transport of the Legislative Council in July this year, the Government is proactively conducting a study with a view to formulating legislative proposals on the regulation of online hailed car platforms and improving the legislation to combat illegal carriage of passengers for hire or reward. The TD is studying and examining the overall demand and supply of local personalised point-to-point transport services, including conducting surveys on passenger demand and changes (which cover various types of online hailed cars); as well as considering relevant information including the current operation modes and regulatory arrangement in respect of the provision of personalised point-to-point transport services in Hong Kong and other places. After taking into account findings of the study in a holistic manner and listening to the views of stakeholders, the Government will formulate legislative proposals on the regulation of the types and number of vehicle for providing compliant services through online hailed car platforms, as well as the licensing requirements for the vehicles and drivers, etc. in 2025. (2) and (3) The numbers of convicted cases involving illegal carriage of passengers for hire or reward by light goods vehicles and cross-boundary private cars in the past three years (from mid-2021 to mid-2024) were 23 and four respectively. Subject to the circumstances of individual cases, the penalties imposed by the courts included fines and disqualifying the drivers involved from driving temporarily, as well as suspension of vehicle licences and impoundment of vehicles involved following the statutory periods specified under the law. The Government does not maintain other information requested in the question. (4) As at September 2024, there were 524 cross-boundary hire cars holding regular quotas for cross-boundary hire cars, closed road permits (CRP) and private service (limousine) (cross-boundary service) hire car permits.      The HKPF will continue to combat the offences of illegal carriage of passengers for hire or reward by cross-boundary private cars. Upon the public’s provision of information to report illegal activities , the HKPF will follow up and investigate in a serious manner, and take enforcement actions against relevant activities if there is sufficient evidence. To enhance the deterrent effect, the Government increased the penalties for illegal carriage of passengers for hire or reward by motor vehicles in December 2023. These include increasing the maximum fine and term of imprisonment, as well as lengthening the period of suspension of vehicle licences and impoundment of vehicles. On the other hand, for cases of illegal carriage of passengers for hire or reward by cross-boundary private cars, the TD will revoke the CRP of the subject vehicle on the ground of breaching CRP conditions. Moreover, the TD has strengthened its publicity efforts since the second quarter of this year through displaying posters and notices at various land boundary control points and the airport, as well as sending e-mails and distributing leaflets, etc, to remind CRP holders and relevant operators not to engage in illegal carriage of passengers for hire or reward, and remind them of the consequences and penalties of engaging in such illegal activities.

     
    Ends/Wednesday, October 30, 2024Issued at HKT 11:30

    NNNN

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI China: China expresses disapproval for EU’s tariff ruling

    Source: China State Council Information Office 3

    China-made new energy vehicles await shipment to Europe in Xiamen, Fujian province. [Photo/Xinhua]

    China does not approve of or accept the European Commission’s decision to impose extra tariffs on China-made electric vehicles, a spokesperson with the Ministry of Commerce said on Wednesday.

    MIL OSI China News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Background Press Call on U.S. Efforts to Address U.S. Investments in Certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of  Concern

    US Senate News:

    Source: The White House
    Via Teleconference
    2:38 P.M. EDT
    MODERATOR:  Good afternoon, everyone.  Thanks so much for joining today’s call.  As a reminder, this call will be on background, attributable to senior administration officials, and it is embargoed until 5:00 p.m. Eastern today.
    For your awareness, not for your reporting, on the call today we have [senior administration official], [senior administration official], [senior administration official], and [senior administration official]. 
    We’ll follow up shortly after the call with embargoed materials as well, but I will turn it over to [senior administration officials] who will have a few words at the top, and then we’ll take your questions. 
    Over to you.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Thanks, Eduardo, and thanks to everybody for joining us today.
    Since the earliest days of the administration, President Biden has said we are at an inflection point with respect to advanced technologies.  And as he’s often said, we will see more technological change in the next 10 years than we saw in the last 50.
    And that has motivated historic investments, mobilizing hundreds of billions of dollars in private investment to rebuild American manufacturing and innovation. 
    The flipside of that, of course, of promoting critical technologies is, of course, protecting them.  And recognizing how transformative certain technologies can be, the President directed his national security team to ensure that where we have significant advantages, our world-leading technologies and know-how are not used against us to undermine our national security.  That’s been the guiding principle for the Biden-Harris administration’s export control policies, as well as the Outbound Investment Program that we’re glad to announce is being finalized today. 
    As many of you know, we’ve been working on this approach to address certain outbound investments in sensitive technologies and critical sectors that could undermine American national security for some time.  And, in particular, we’ve been focused on the exploitation of certain intangible benefits that often accompany U.S. outbound investments and that help companies succeed through, for example, enhancing their standing and prominence, providing certain types of assistance, introducing investment and talent networks, opening up market access, and enhancing access to additional financing. 
    The People’s Republic of China has a stated goal, as you know: to develop key sensitive technologies that will directly support the PRC’s military modernization and related activities, including weapons development, and it has exploited U.S. investments to develop domestic, military, and intelligence capabilities. 
    So, today, the Treasury Department will issue a Final Rule to implement President Biden’s Executive Order 14105, from August of 2023, which is entitled “Addressing United States Investments in Certain National Security Technologies and Products in Countries of Concern.” 
    The Final Rule provides the operative regulations and a detailed, explanatory discussion regarding its intent and application.  And as directed in the President’s executive order, the Final Rule does prohibit U.S. persons from engaging in certain transactions involving a defined set of technologies and products that pose a particularly acute national security risk to the United States. 
    The Final Rule also requires U.S. persons to notify the Treasury Department of certain other transactions involving a defined set of technologies and products that may contribute to a threat to the national security of the United States. 
    Covered technologies fall into three categories: semiconductors and microelectronics, quantum information technologies, and artificial intelligence.  This set of technologies, we believe, is core for the next generation of military, cybersecurity, surveillance, and intelligence applications, providing what we believe are force multiplier capabilities. 
    The United States already prohibits and restricts the export to countries of concern of many of the technologies and products covered by the Final Rule.  This program complements the United States’ existing export control and inbound screening tools by preventing U.S. investment from advancing the development of these technologies and products in countries of concern. 
    The Treasury Department, as [senior administration official] will lay out, has used feedback through the notice and comment process to help design a carefully tailored approach.  And we also want to commend Senators Casey and Cornyn, Representatives DeLauro, Fitzpatrick, and Pascrell, as well as Representatives Meeks and McCaul in particular, for their leadership on this issue. 
    The overwhelmingly bipartisan vote on Senators Casey and Cornyn’s Outbound Investment Transparency Act as an amendment to the Senate NDAA demonstrates the shared will of Congress and the administration to meaningfully regulate outbound investments. 
    So, with that, I’ll turn it over to [senior administration official] to provide more detail on the content of the Final Rule. 
    Over to you.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Thanks very much.  As mentioned today, Treasury is issuing, at the direction of the President, a targeted and narrowly scoped regulation that implements a new program to address this threat to U.S. national security.  The Final Rule has clear thresholds and definitions to implement the executive order, and provides detailed, explanatory discussion regarding its intent and application to assist investors and other stakeholders to help them navigate this new program. 
    The Final Rule does two things at its core, as previewed: First, it prohibits U.S. persons from engaging in certain transactions involving semiconductors, quantum, and artificial intelligence.  And second, it requires U.S. persons to notify Treasury of certain other transactions involving semiconductors and artificial intelligence. 
    The rule explains in detail the scope of the program, definitions, processes, requirements, and penalties for non-compliance, among other things.  Importantly, this rule has benefited from the input of a variety of stakeholders, industry experts, and allies and partners. 
    We had two rounds of formal comments on the rulemaking to implement the executive order, first with the August 2023 ANPRM that was issued alongside the ENO and on which we got 60 comments from stakeholders.  Those comments were integral in developing the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that we issued in June of this year and on which we received more than 40 additional comments, which further informed the development of the Final Rule.
    Over two-plus years, Treasury, along with the Departments of State and Commerce, have led extensive engagements with stakeholders across the globe.  These engagements and our deliberate decision to offer two rounds of public comment have helped us receive insightful feedback that has helped inform the Final Rule to ensure to choose our national security objectives while taking into account the need to be focused, targeted, and clear. 
    Now, I’ll briefly discuss a few key aspects of the rule. 
    First, as [senior administration official] suggested, the rule imposes requirements on U.S. persons.  This includes prohibiting U.S. persons from engaging in certain transactions with what the rule identifies as covered foreign persons, and requires the U.S. persons to notify the Treasury Department about other transactions that involve covered foreign persons. 
    Second, the Final Rule focuses on specific categories of investment transactions where the target of the investment has a nexus to the PRC and activities involving sensitive technologies and products. 
    In terms of what transactions are covered, the Final Rule applies to, among other things, a U.S. person’s acquisition of an equity interest or contingent equity interest, certain debt financing, certain greenfield investments, or investments that could result in corporate expansion and joint ventures.  This would include, for example, a U.S. investment firm taking an equity stake in an advanced semiconductor manufacturer in the PRC.  It would also cover a U.S. company’s purchase of land in the PRC to develop a quantum computing research facility. 
    There are exceptions for certain types of transactions that are less likely to contribute to the national security threat we’re worried about. 
    For example, the Final Rule excepts or carves out certain investments by a U.S. person to publicly trade securities and certain investments made by a limited partner in a pooled investment fund, among others.
    In light of our ongoing conversations with allies and partners on the importance of multilateral efforts in this area, the Final Rule also includes an exception for certain transactions involving a person of a country or territory outside the United States where the Secretary of the Treasury has determined that the country or territory is addressing national security concerns posed by outbound investment. 
    And third, in terms of the technologies and products in scope for the program, the Final Rule provides technical details on the subsets of semiconductors, quantum, and artificial intelligence that are relevant to the program. 
    For example, a U.S. person is prohibited from acquiring equity in a PRC entity that manufactures advanced semiconductors or that is developing an AI system designed exclusively or intended for a military end use.  A U.S. person would be required to notify Treasury if they are acquiring equity in a PRC company that manufactures legacy semiconductors. 
    Other examples include direct equity investments by a company or private equity fund into any PRC company that is repurposing an AI model for penetration testing or automated vulnerability detection and exploitation, which would be covered under the rule as either notifiable or prohibited, depending on the design end use and computing power used to train an AI system. 
    In addition to direct investments, indirect investments through a parent of a PRC company that is using AI models to improve targeting, intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance, or autonomous weapons systems for military use would be prohibited, as would such indirect investments in a PRC company developing or scaling quantum computers or networks to undermine encryption systems.  These technologies can be used for advanced code breaking, the development of next-generation military applications, or offensive cyber operations. 
    Additionally, in general, the rule is based on a U.S. person’s knowledge of the relevant facts, rendering a transaction to be covered under the rule.  Enforcement and penalties are consistent with the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA, the authority by which the President issued the executive order. 
    The Final Rule takes effect on January 2nd, giving stakeholders time to organize internal infrastructure and processes to ensure compliance with the rule. 
    The lengthy preamble to the rule summarizes the response to the comments received, as well as provides an explanation of the changes since the proposed rule issued over the summer. 
    And let me make two additional and final points before concluding. 
    First, this program is calibrated to help ensure our actions can be supported multilaterally, which is a critical component to maximize its effectiveness and reduce backfill from other investors.  The administration has been engaged in extensive conversations with allies and partners on the issue, and we are encouraged to see some allies and partners, including the European Commission and the United Kingdom, exploring the issue of outbound investment security in their own jurisdictions.
    Second, cross-border investment flows have long contributed to U.S. economic vitality.  This targeted action is focused on national security and scope to address specific risks posed by certain U.S. outbound investment, and it maintains our longstanding commitment to open investment. 
    Thanks.  And back to you, Eduardo, for questions.
    MODERATOR:  Thank you.  We now have time for a few questions.  If you’d like to ask a question, please use the “Raise Your Hand” feature on Zoom, and we’ll come to you. 
    First up, we’ll go to Michael Martina.
    Q    Hi there.  Appreciate you doing this.  So, what you described sounds quite similar to the notice for proposed rulemaking earlier in the year.  I’m wondering if you can detail any specific or key changes that you made to the original notice you said it was used to inform this Final Rule.  So, are any changes from earlier?
    And just an effort at clarification.  You know, given the exemptions for publicly traded securities, is it the White House’s contention that China has not significantly exploited publicly traded security purchases by U.S. investors to enhance their military or intelligence capabilities?  My understanding is that this is perfectly fine — you could trade public securities for Chinese defense companies under this; that’s totally within the rules.  Is that correct?  Thanks. 
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  So, maybe I’ll take the first question, Eduardo.  And then, [senior administration official], if you want to chime in on the second from a White House perspective.
    So, I think while largely consistent with the NPRM in scope and structure, the Final Rule does contain some changes, including with respect to clarity of the rule and thinking forward to compliance. 
    So, for example, we’ve selected clear technical thresholds for notifiable and prohibited transactions involving AI systems based on the amount of compute power to train an AI system that is open in the NPRM; refine how the rule applies to U.S. persons with investment banking authority and non-U.S. entity, such that it clearly applies only to those who actually exercise authority, for example; and clarifying with respect to compliance and enforcement with the rule. 
    And so, there are a number of areas where we have honed and focused and sharpened the rule since then, and those are some examples.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Thanks for the question, Michael.  So, I will say we do have existing authorities to address the threat you were discussing.  So, for example, Treasury has authorities — the Chinese military industrial complex sanctions regulations that are intended to address U.S. persons from purchasing or selling publicly traded securities and companies that are involved in this sector, and there are others as well. 
    MODERATOR:  Next up, we’ll go to the line of Anita Powell.
    Q    Thank you so much.  As you guys are surely aware, Elon Musk is developing a data center in China to train the algorithm to work on self-driving cars.  That’s a lot simpler than I think it really is.  But anyway, is this the type of investment that might be restricted under this new rule?  Can you just kind of flesh that out for us?
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Sure.  Happy to start. 
    Look, I don’t think we’re going to get into hypothetical scenarios, but just reiterate some of the points that I’ve said. 
    What the rule is really targeted on is capital and the intangibles that can flow from such American capital to go into the development of PRC-based — not just based, but PRC-based entities that are developing these advanced technologies.  And so, that’s sort of the scope of the rule. 
    And one thing I will mention is that Treasury will provide some guidance and other documents during this interim period before the rule goes online.  That’s certainly our intent to help flesh this out.  But I think going back to the core tenets of the rule is the best way to answer that.
    MODERATOR:  Next up, we’ll go to the line of (inaudible).
    Q    Yeah, hi.  Thanks for doing this and for taking my question.  Could you talk a little bit more about the engagement with allies and partners in the process of finalizing this rule, specifically which allies specifically you engaged with and whether there are any allies who are going to create similar rules of their own?  Thank you.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  [Senior administration official], maybe you could start with engagements with allies that you’ve had, but then maybe, [senior administration official], if we could go to you, you could talk a little bit about the G7 as well.  That might be helpful.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:   Yeah, sure.  Thanks. 
    So, in terms of — just to sort of put a topper before going to [senior administration official], we’ve had a number of engagements with partners and allies, which have resulted in not only sort of technical exchanges about what we are doing and why we’re doing it, but also various statements.  And [senior administration official] will allude to one of them with regard to the G7, but obviously the European Commission and the United Kingdom have made statements in support of these goals.  And so, it’s an ongoing process and one that will continue.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Yeah, and just to add on to what [senior administration official] said, this is something that, you know, even from the White House level we engage with our closest allies and partners on.  And [senior administration official] referenced, you know, a line in the G7 leaders’ statement from Apulia early this year that refers to, you know, recognizing that appropriate measures designed to address risk from outbound investments are important to complement our existing toolkit. 
    So, it’s a conversation that we’re frequently having with our key partners and allies.
    MODERATOR:  And we have time for one more.  We’ll go to the line of Patrick Tucker.
    Q    Hey.  Thanks.  Patrick Tucker from Defense One.
    So, when you say the rule prohibits people from acquiring equity in a PRC entity that manufactures semiconductors that might be used in autonomous weapons systems or that might be repurposed for AI penetration testing, is that based on an observation that there are U.S. firms that currently have investments in those areas of autonomous weaponry and penetration testing for China?  Or are you making the rule now in anticipation that firms might begin to invest in that sort of thing?  I’m trying to get a sense of the degree to which U.S. firms have exposure and have willingly made investments in these areas of the Chinese military.
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  So let me start, [senior administration official], and then perhaps, [senior administration official], pass it to you. 
    I think what we are worried about, which I would focus on, is the kinds of scenarios that we have outlined, which is supported by data.  And one statistic that comes to mind — and I won’t get it exactly right, so I’d refer you to the Georgetown Center for — I think it’s Technology — that had a statistic that said something to the effect of: For a five-year period, I think between 2016 and 2020 or 2021, 17 percent of investment in Chinese artificial intelligence companies included U.S. participation, and of that, 91 percent was at the venture capital stage. 
    I think if you think about those sets of facts and scenarios, that’s the kind of situation that when it comes to certain artificial intelligence capable of impacting our national security, from military intelligence, cyber, other related perspectives, that’s what we’re concerned about. 
    SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL:  Yeah, I would just add to that that part of the motivation, as we were looking at some case studies to inform the development of this executive order and the regulation, actually was focused on cybersecurity, where we had a number — we saw a number of VC investments directly into firms working on cybersecurity that ended up on the entity list for working with Chinese military or intelligence services.
    MODERATOR:  Thanks, everyone, for joining.  That’s all the time we have for today.  As a reminder, this call was on background, attributable to senior administration officials, and the contents of the call are embargoed until 5:00 p.m. Eastern. 
    We’ll follow up shortly with embargoed materials as well. but do reach out to us, to the NSC or Treasury, with any questions in the meantime.  Thanks so much.
    3:00 P.M. EDT  

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI New Zealand: Taupō SH1 maintenance jumps the queue

    Source: New Zealand Transport Agency

    A major change in the scheduling of the maintenance on SH1 between Tīrau and Waiouru has seen the closure of the East Taupō Arterial section of SH1 brought forward to Monday 11 November until 6 December 2024. 

    The work required on the East Taupō Arterial road includes rebuilding 2.5km of the road, adjusting median barriers, clearing the shoulders, repairing signs and adding in new line marking.  

    NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi Regional Manager of Maintenance and Operations for Waikato and Bay of Plenty, Roger Brady, says this change in scheduling has a range of benefits for road users and the wider Taupō community.  

    “There are a number of large events planned in November and December in Taupō, including the Cycle Challenge and Ironman 70.3 World Championship(external link). Changing the sequence of our work on SH1 means we avoid causing considerable disruption to competitors and spectators during the lead up and at the events. 
       
    “We had originally planned on a second SH1 closure between Ātiamuri to Wairakei to happen before this Christmas, but the work on that section will now take place in spring 2025. As a result we can fit in the work on the East Taupō Arterial section of SH1 before Christmas.  

    “Once completed, we would only need to come back for the final surfacing early next year, minimising the overall impact of motorists. 

    “We’ve worked closely with Taupō District Council (TDC) to understand the best timing for closing the various sections and believe together we have come up with a solution that is best for the wider Taupō community. TDC are able to incorporate road works they need to do into our closure, and they have helped to shape our traffic management to minimise disruption as much as possible. We’d like to extend our thanks to TDC for working so collaboratively with us.  

    “We’d also like to thank the Taupō community and businesses for their understanding and patience. We know that we haven’t been able to provide much notice, but this short-term disruption will be worth it in the long run.” 

    Taupō will be very busy during December and there will be pressure on the highways and local roads in the area due to the various events as well as the road works. Motorists are encouraged to use the official detour via Broadlands Road and Ohaaki Road to SH5, and vice versa. The recommended detour adds an extra 45.5 km and approx. 32 min to journeys.

    Those travelling to north or south destinations either side of Taupō may prefer to utilise other state highway routes such as SH3, SH4 and SH49.  

    Putāruru to Tokoroa closures in December 

    SH1 between Tokoroa and upper Ātiamuri is currently closed, with the road rebuilding work progressing well.  Subject to this work being completed as planned by the end of November, the crews will then start work on the Putāruru to Tokoroa section in the last week of November. SH1 will be closed for approximately 4 weeks until Friday 20 December with all north and south bound vehicles being detoured 24/7. 

    “Crews are working hard to finish work on the Tokoroa to upper Ātiamuri. We are also depending on good weather. Once completed, over 24 lane kilometres, or nearly 130,000 square metres of road, will have been upgraded,” Mr Brady says.

    “As soon as crews are finished there, they will be moving north to the next section. We’re unable to work on both sections as it’s too disruptive to have both sections closed to the public at once.” 

    Specific work sites and final dates are expected to be confirmed in the coming week. Keep an eye on nzta.govt.nz/t2w for the latest updates.  

    This work forms part of the government’s $2.07 billion investment into road and drainage renewal and maintenance across 2024-27 via the State Highway Pothole Prevention fund.  

    Construction work on SH1 between Tokoroa and upper Ātiamuri.

    MIL OSI New Zealand News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: New road layout coming soon to Downshire Bridge

    Source: Northern Ireland City of Armagh

    Improvements will enhance pedestrian accessibility creating a safer environment for everyone.

    A new road layout will be introduced to Downshire Bridge (The Cut) Banbridge as the £6m public realm scheme nears completion following a major investment. Changes to enhance pedestrian accessibility and the movement of traffic around the Downshire Bridge will take effect from 7pm on Sunday 17th November 2024.

    Road resurfacing and new layout works will take place from 7pm on Saturday 16th November through to 7pm on Sunday 17th November. Overnight weekend works will be carried out to minimise disruption to the busy town centre.

    The key changes coming into effect from Sunday 17th November 2024 will be:

    • The introduction of two ‘Give Way’ signs and road markings at the top of Newry Street and Bridge Street. This means drivers should stop and give way on their approach up the legs of ‘The Cut’.
    • The traffic priority will now be for vehicles moving through Scarva Street and Rathfriland Street.
    • The existing pedestrian crossing on Scarva Street has been moved closer to the junction with Bridge Street.
    • A second pedestrian crossing on Rathfriland Street, close to Houston’s/Menary’s shop corner which aims to create a safer street crossing for pedestrians in this area.

    Lord Mayor of Armagh City, Banbridge and Craigavon Borough, Councillor Sarah Duffy said:

    “As public realm works near completion it is great to see the positive impact this significant investment has had to Banbridge Town Centre. With new and improved pavements and footpaths, feature lighting and street furniture this project has not only created a high-quality and better-connected streetscape, it has strongly focused on improving safety and accessibility for all users to create a safer environment for everyone.

    “The remaining works will introduce changes surrounding the Downshire bridge with priority for pedestrians, as well as improving the junctions for vehicles and traffic flow across the bridge. I understand it will take time to adjust to the new layout and I encourage everyone to embrace the changes recommended to improve this area and make it safer for everyone.”

    During the initial design stages of the public realm scheme, extensive consultations were undertaken with a range of user groups including the Chamber of Commerce, Section 75 groups, such as RNIB, Guide Dogs UK and the Older People’s Alliance.  The Department for Infrastructure advised that the junction at The Cut should be improved to adhere to new guidance.

    An audit was carried out by Inclusive Mobility and Transport Advisory Committee (IMTAC), which identified the junction as a particularly unfriendly environment for pedestrians.

    Michael Larimor, from IMTAC, who completed the audit report on Banbridge commented:

    “In our original report about the area around the bridge we described the layout as an unfriendly environment for most pedestrians but completely inaccessible for many disabled people. The new road layout goes a long way to addressing these issues.

    “The simple change of road priority requiring users of the bridge slip roads to give way immediately makes pedestrians crossing at junctions safer. This coupled with two zebras providing pedestrians with priority crossing across Scarva Street and Rathfriland Street changes the nature of the bridge area completely, giving a much greater priority to pedestrians in the area. The improved sight lines and the reinstatement of kerbs, coupled with the changes in road priority makes the entire area safer and more accessible for disabled people in particular.”

    New road layout signage will be in operation to make drivers and pedestrians aware of the changes and to remind them to approach with caution until users become familiar with the new road layout.

    To find out more information about the public realm scheme and to view a video animation of the new road layout and changes coming into effect on Sunday 17th November 2024, please visit www.armaghbanbridgecraigavon.gov.uk/banbridgepublicrealm

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Highway repairs and improvements planned for Western Road

    Source: City of Leicester

    TRAFFIC restrictions will be in place on a busy residential road in Leicester’s West End from next week, while extensive resurfacing and other improvements are carried out.

    Leicester City Council will carry out essential maintenance work on Western Road from Sunday 3 November.

    Footpaths will be improved to remove dropped kerbs that cut across the pavement and do not now provide access to a parking or loading area. Work to improve carriageway drainage in Western Road will also be carried out.

    Changes will also be made to the crossroads at the junction of Western Road and Briton Street, where adjustments will be made to give priority to vehicles and cycles on Briton Street.

    Resurfacing of the main carriageway on Western Road, between its junctions with Braunstone Gate and Briton Street, will be carried out in Spring 2025.

    Initial works are expected to be complete by late January, and will be carried out in phases on short sections of the road to help minimise disruption. Parking restrictions and rolling road closures will be required, with well signposted diversions in place. Access to houses, shops and businesses will be maintained. Work will be suspended during the Christmas holiday period with full access reinstated.

    Cllr Geoff Whittle, assistant city mayor for environment and transport, said: “The city’s road network needs regular maintenance and repairs to ensure it can cope with modern demands.

    “These latest works will see major maintenance and improvements made to a busy residential street and important local route, which will benefit of everyone who uses it.

    “For that work to take place, parts of the road will need to be closed temporarily but diversions will be clearly signposted and disruption will be kept to a minimum wherever possible.”

    The scheme is expected to cost about £700,000 and will be funded as part of the Connecting Leicester programme which is supported by the Department for Transport’s Transforming Cities Fund.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI USA: U.S. energy production has increased faster than energy consumption over the past 50 years

    Source: US Energy Information Administration

    In-brief analysis

    October 29, 2024

    Data source: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Monthly Energy Review
    Note: Positive net imports mean the United States imported more energy than it exported, while negative net imports mean the United States exported more energy than it imported. Data are for the first seven months of 1974 and 2024. Total energy includes coal, natural gas, petroleum, nuclear, and renewables. See primary energy consumption in the EIA Glossary.

    In October 1974, in the wake of the 1973 Oil Embargo, the Federal Energy Administration—the predecessor of the U.S. Department of Energy—published the first issue of the Monthly Energy Review (MER), an overview of the energy produced and consumed in the United States. In the 50 years since that first publication, the U.S. energy sector has transformed.

    In 1974, the United States consumed more energy than it produced domestically and was a net importer of energy from other countries. Today, the United States produces more energy than it consumes domestically and is a net exporter of energy to other countries.

    Between January and July 2024—the most recent data available—total U.S. energy production was 68%, or 24.0 quadrillion British thermal units (quads), more than the same period in 1974. Increased crude oil and natural gas production, brought about by improvements in drilling techniques such as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling beginning in the 2000s, drove much of the growth in total energy production.

    U.S. energy consumption has increased steadily since 1974, although total consumption growth is less than total production growth. Between January and July 2024, U.S. energy consumption was 32%, or 13.2 quads, more than the same period in 1974. Consumption growth is due to several factors including population growth and increased economic activity. However, primary energy consumption has generally decreased on both a per capita basis and in terms of energy consumed per dollar of GDP since the 1970s. Increased energy efficiency has contributed to these decreases.

    The increase in energy production over the last two decades has turned the United States into the world’s largest crude oil and natural gas producer today and from a net energy importer to a net energy exporter starting in 2019. U.S. net energy imports in the first seven months of 1974 were about 6.8 quads. The United States exported a net total of about 5.0 quads during the same period in 2024. The main driver of this shift has been growing exports of crude oil and petroleum products and liquefied natural gas (LNG) over the last 15 years.


    Evolution of our data collection
    The MER, which predates the establishment of the U.S. Department of Energy in 1977, was first published by the Federal Energy Administration. The MER has grown from 22 tables and 55 graphs in its first issue to 101 tables and 182 graphs in the October 2024 publication. Recent data additions include electric vehicle stocks and electricity use, electricity net summer capacity and capacity factors, and a new total energy flow diagram. For a full list of changes and additions to the MER back to 2000, see the What’s New in the Monthly Energy Review page.


    Principal contributor: Brett Marohl

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI USA: Gateway: Centering Science

    Source: NASA

    Gateway is set to advance science in deep space, bringing groundbreaking research opportunities to lunar orbit.

    Stephanie Dudley sits at the intersection of human spaceflight and science for Gateway, humanity’s first lunar space station that will host astronauts and unique scientific investigations.
    Gateway’s mission integration and utilization manager, Dudley recently posed for this photo in a high-fidelity mockup of the space station’s HALO (Habitation and Logistics Outpost), where astronauts will live, conduct science, and prepare for missions to investigate the lunar South Pole region. Dudley works with NASA’s partner space agencies and academia to identify science opportunities on Gateway.
    HALO will host various science experiments, including the Heliophysics Environmental and Radiation Measurement Experiment Suite, led by NASA, and the Internal Dosimeter Array, led by ESA (European Space Agency) and JAXA (Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency). The heliophysics experiment will fly on HALO’s exterior, and the dosimeter will be housed inside Gateway in a series of racks, mockups of which are shown to the right of Dudley in the image above. Both experiments will study solar and cosmic radiation to help the science community better understand how to protect astronauts and hardware during deep space travels to places like Mars.
    “We are building [Gateway] for a 15-year lifespan, but definitely hope that we go longer than that,” Dudley recently said on Houston We Have a Podcast. “And so that many years of scientific study in a place where humans have never worked and lived long-term, Gateway is going to allow us to do that.”
    Dudley pulls double duty as a deputy director for the Exploration Operations Office within NASA’s Moon to Mars Program, a role that connects her to Artemis science beyond Gateway, including science investigations on the Orion and Human Landing System spacecraft and lunar terrain vehicle.
    “My work…is helping to make sure that across all of the six [Artemis] programs, including Gateway, we’re all focusing on utilization in the same way,” Dudley said.
    Dudley’s team coordinates science payloads for Artemis II, the first mission to send humans to the Moon since 1972, and Artemis III, the first landing in the lunar South Pole region that is of keen interest to the global science community.
    Gateway’s HALO will launch with the space station’s Power and Propulsion Element ahead of the Artemis IV mission in 2028, the first lunar mission to include an orbiting space station.
    “Gateway sounds so science fiction, but it’s real,” Dudley recently said. “And we’re building it. And in a few years, it’s going to be around the Moon and that’s when the real work, the fun work in my opinion, is going to begin and science will never be the same.”
    Gateway is humanity’s first lunar space station as a central component of the Artemis campaign that will return humans to the Moon for scientific discovery and chart a path for the first human missions to Mars.

    MIL OSI USA News

  • MIL-OSI Global: On foreign policy, Trump opts for disruption and Harris for engagement − but they share some of the same concerns

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Garret Martin, Senior Professorial Lecturer, Co-Director Transatlantic Policy Center, American University School of International Service

    Who will represent the U.S. better on the global stage? Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

    According to conventional wisdom, U.S. voters are largely motivated by domestic concerns and especially the economy.

    But the upcoming presidential election may be somewhat of an outlier. In a September 2024 poll, foreign policy actually ranks quite high in voters’ concerns – with more Democrats and Republicans combined saying it was “very important” to their vote than, say, immigration and abortion.

    As such, understanding where Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump and Democratic rival Kamala Harris stand on the significant international issues of the day is important. And we can do so by looking at the records of their respective administrations in the three regions they prioritized: the Indo-Pacific, Europe and the Middle East.

    Donald Trump: Disrupter-in-chief

    In his 2017 inaugural address, Trump painted a dark picture of the U.S. In his telling, his country was being taken advantage of by other nations, especially in trade and security, while neglecting domestic challenges.

    To disrupt this, Trump promised an “America First” approach to guide his administration.

    And in practice, his foreign policy certainly proved disruptive. He showed a clear willingness to buck traditions and undid some of former President Barack Obama’s signature policies, such as the Iran nuclear deal, which exchanged sanctions relief for restrictions on Tehran’s domestic nuclear program, and the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement.

    In so doing, he ruffled the feathers of allies and foes alike.

    Trans-Atlantic relations were tense under Trump, especially because of his hostility toward NATO. After deriding the Atlantic alliance on the campaign trail, Trump stuck to the same tune while in office. He routinely insulted allies at high-level summits and allegedly came close to withdrawing from the alliance altogether in 2018.

    While NATO did make inroads in bolstering its Eastern flank in that period, the alliance was primarily defined by internal turmoil and limited cohesion during Trump’s time in office. U.S. relations with the European Union hardly fared better. In 2018, the U.S. imposed steel and aluminum tariffs on the European Union, citing national security concerns.

    Trump also broke with previous U.S. presidents in his administration’s Asia policy. One of his first moves in 2017 was to abandon the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a trade deal negotiated by Obama. Trump’s late 2017 national security strategy also announced a major shift toward China, labeling it as a “strategic competitor” – implying a greater emphasis on containing China as opposed to cooperating with it.

    This hawkish turn played out especially in the field of trade. Trump’s administration imposed four rounds of tariffs in 2018-19, affecting US$360 billion of Chinese goods. Beijing, of course, responded with tariffs of its own. The two countries did sign a so-called phase-one deal in January 2020 that sought to lower the stakes of this trade war. But the COVID-19 pandemic nullified any chance of success, and relations soured further with each Trump utterance of the pandemic being a “Chinese virus.”

    Trump showcased somewhat contradictory impulses toward the Middle East and other issues. He pushed for disengagement and to undo Obama’s major policies. Besides withdrawing from the Paris climate accords in 2017, Trump abandoned the Iran nuclear deal in 2018. His administration also signed a deal to end the U.S. presence in Afghanistan, and it withdrew forces from northern Syria.

    But at the same time, Trump continued the bombing campaign against the Islamic State group in Syria and Iraq and authorized the killing of Iranian Gen. Qasem Soleimani in 2020. The latter was consistent with a policy that aimed to pressure and isolate Iran economically and diplomatically. The key example of the diplomatic pressure came through especially via the Abraham Accords through which Trump helped facilitate the establishment of normal diplomatic ties between Israel and the UAE, Bahrain and Morocco.

    Kamala Harris: Alliance and engagement

    Although not taking a driving role in foreign policy, Harris has been part of an administration that has committed the U.S. to repairing alliances and engaging with the world.

    This came across by undoing some major actions from the Trump administration. For example, the U.S. quickly rejoined the Paris climate accords and overturned a decision to leave the World Health Organization.

    But in other areas, the Biden administration has shown more continuity with Trump than many expected.

    For instance, the U.S. under Biden has not fundamentally deviated from strategic competition with China, even though the tactics have differed a little. The administration maintained Trump’s tariff approach, even adding its own targeted rounds against Beijing on electric vehicles.

    Moreover, it cultivated different diplomatic platforms in the Indo-Pacific to act as a counterweight to China. This included the cultivation of the Quad dialogue with Australia, India and Japan, and the AUKUS deal with Australia and the U.K., both of which attempted to further the Biden administration’s strategy of containing China’s influence by enlisting regional allies. Finally, the Biden administration did maintain some channels of communication with China at the highest level as well, with Biden meeting Xi Jinping twice during his presidency.

    Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy walks alongside Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House compound on Sept. 26, 2024.
    Tom Brenner/Getty Images

    The Biden administration’s Middle Eastern policy displayed significant continuity with Trump’s approach – at first. While it turned out to be chaotic, the U.S. completed the withdrawal of its troops from Afghanistan in summer 2021, as had been agreed under Trump. The Biden administration also embraced the format and goals of the Abraham Accords. It even tried to build on them, with the goal of fostering Israeli-Saudi diplomatic ties.

    Of course, the attacks of Oct. 7, 2023, in Israel completely changed the equation in the Middle East. Preventing the spiral of violence in the region has become an all-consuming task. Since then, Biden and Harris have tried, largely unsuccessfully, to balance support for Israel with mediation efforts to liberate the hostages and to ensure a cease-fire.

    Trans-Atlantic relations, however, are an area where there were marked differences in the past four years. The tone of the Biden-Harris administration has been in sharp contrast with that of Trump, reaffirming frequently its clear commitment to NATO. And once Russia launched its illegal invasion in February 2022, the U.S. placed itself at the forefront of supporting Ukraine.

    Harris has suggested that she would continue Biden’s policy of providing Kyiv with extensive and continuous military support. In conjunction with allies, the White House of Biden and Harris also implemented a broad range of sanctions against Russia. But the U.S. under Biden has not yet been willing to support Ukraine’s immediate entry into NATO.

    What next?

    Based on their records, what could we expect of a Trump or Harris presidency?

    It’s unlikely either candidate will abandon strategic competition with China. But Trump is more likely to seriously escalate the trade war, promising extensive tariffs against Beijing. Trump’s commitment to defending Taiwan is also more ambiguous in comparison with Harris’ pledges.

    U.S. policy toward Europe will largely depend on the results of the election. Harris has frequently underlined her steadfast support for NATO, as well as for Ukraine. Trump, on the other hand, is showing signs that he is unwilling to further aid the regime in Kyiv.

    And for the Middle East, it remains to be seen whether either Trump or Harris would be able to better shape events in the region.

    Garret Martin receives funding from the European Union for the research institute he co-directs, the Transatlantic Policy Center.

    ref. On foreign policy, Trump opts for disruption and Harris for engagement − but they share some of the same concerns – https://theconversation.com/on-foreign-policy-trump-opts-for-disruption-and-harris-for-engagement-but-they-share-some-of-the-same-concerns-238847

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Israel’s ban on UNRWA continues a pattern of politicizing Palestinian refugee aid – and puts millions of lives at risk

    Source: The Conversation – USA – By Nicholas R. Micinski, Assistant Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, University of Maine

    The Israeli parliament’s vote on Oct. 28, 2024, to ban the United Nations agency that provides relief for Palestinian refugees is likely to affect millions of people – it also fits a pattern.

    Aid for refugees, particularly Palestinian refugees, has long been politicized, and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, or UNRWA, has been targeted throughout its 75-year history.

    This was evident earlier in the current Gaza conflict, when at least a dozen countries, including the U.S., suspended funding to the UNRWA, citing allegations made by Israel that 12 UNRWA employees participated in the attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023. In August, the U.N. fired nine UNRWA employees for alleged involvement in the attack. An independent U.N. panel established a set of 50 recommendations to ensure UNRWA employees adhere to the principle of neutrality.

    The vote by the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, to ban the UNRWA goes a step further. It will, when it comes into effect, prevent the UNRWA from operating in Israel and will severely affect its ability to serve refugees in any of the occupied territories that Israel controls, including Gaza. This could have devastating consequences for livelihoods, health, the distribution of food aid and schooling for Palestinians. It would also damage the polio vaccination campaign that the UNRWA and its partner organizations have been carrying out in Gaza since September. Finally, the bill bans communication between Israeli officials and the UNRWA, which would end efforts by the agency to coordinate the movements of aid workers to prevent unintentional targeting by the Israel Defense Forces.

    Refugee aid, and humanitarian aid more generally, is theoretically meant to be neutral and impartial. But as experts in migration and international relations, we know funding is often used as a foreign policy tool, whereby allies are rewarded and enemies punished. In this context, we believe Israel’s banning of the UNRWA fits a wider pattern of the politicization of aid to refugees, particularly Palestinian refugees.

    What is the UNRWA?

    The UNRWA, short for United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, was established two years after about 750,000 Palestinians were expelled or fled from their homes during the months leading up to the creation of the state of Israel in 1948 and the subsequent Arab-Israeli war.

    Palestinians flee their homes during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war.
    Pictures from History/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

    Prior to the UNRWA’s creation, international and local organizations, many of them religious, provided services to displaced Palestinians. But after surveying the extreme poverty and dire situation pervasive across refugee camps, the U.N. General Assembly, including all Arab states and Israel, voted to create the UNRWA in 1949.

    Since that time, the UNRWA has been the primary aid organization providing food, medical care, schooling and, in some cases, housing for the 6 million Palestinians living across its five fields: Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, as well as the areas that make up the occupied Palestinian territories: the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

    The mass displacement of Palestinians – known as the Nakba, or “catastrophe” – occurred prior to the 1951 Refugee Convention, which defined refugees as anyone with a well-founded fear of persecution owing to “events occurring in Europe before 1 January 1951.” Despite a 1967 protocol extending the definition worldwide, Palestinians are still excluded from the primary international system protecting refugees.

    While the UNRWA is responsible for providing services to Palestinian refugees, the United Nations also created the U.N. Conciliation Commission for Palestine in 1948 to seek a long-term political solution and “to facilitate the repatriation, resettlement and economic and social rehabilitation of the refugees and the payment of compensation.”

    As a result, UNRWA does not have a mandate to push for the traditional durable solutions available in other refugee situations. As it happened, the conciliation commission was active only for a few years and has since been sidelined in favor of the U.S.-brokered peace processes.

    Is the UNRWA political?

    The UNRWA has been subject to political headwinds since its inception and especially during periods of heightened tension between Palestinians and Israelis.

    While it is a U.N. organization and thus ostensibly apolitical, it has frequently been criticized by Palestinians, Israelis as well as donor countries, including the United States, for acting politically.

    The UNRWA performs statelike functions across its five fields, including education, health and infrastructure, but it is restricted in its mandate from performing political or security activities.

    Initial Palestinian objections to the UNRWA stemmed from the organization’s early focus on economic integration of refugees into host states.

    Although the UNRWA officially adhered to the U.N. General Assembly’s Resolution 194 that called for the return of Palestine refugees to their homes, U.N., U.K. and U.S. officials searched for means by which to resettle and integrate Palestinians into host states, viewing this as the favorable political solution to the Palestinian refugee situation and the broader Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In this sense, Palestinians perceived the UNRWA to be both highly political and actively working against their interests.

    In later decades, the UNRWA switched its primary focus from jobs to education at the urging of Palestinian refugees. But the UNRWA’s education materials were viewed by Israel as further feeding Palestinian militancy, and the Israeli government insisted on checking and approving all materials in Gaza and the West Bank, which it has occupied since 1967.

    A protester is removed by members of the U.S. Capitol Police during a House hearing on Jan. 30, 2024.
    Alex Wong/Getty Images

    While Israel has long been suspicious of the UNRWA’s role in refugee camps and in providing education, the organization’s operation, which is internationally funded, also saves Israel millions of dollars each year in services it would be obliged to deliver as the occupying power.

    Since the 1960s, the U.S. – the UNRWA’s primary donor – and other Western countries have repeatedly expressed their desire to use aid to prevent radicalization among refugees.

    In response to the increased presence of armed opposition groups, the U.S. attached a provision to its UNRWA aid in 1970, requiring that the “UNRWA take all possible measures to assure that no part of the United States contribution shall be used to furnish assistance to any refugee who is receiving military training as a member of the so-called Palestine Liberation Army (PLA) or any other guerrilla-type organization.”

    The UNRWA adheres to this requirement, even publishing an annual list of its employees so that host governments can vet them, but it also employs 30,000 individuals, the vast majority of whom are Palestinian.

    Questions over links of the UNRWA to any militancy has led to the rise of Israeli and international watch groups that document the social media activity of the organization’s large Palestinian staff.

    In 2018, the Trump administration paused its US$60 million contribution to the UNRWA. Trump claimed the pause would create political pressure for Palestinians to negotiate. President Joe Biden restarted U.S. contributions to the UNRWA in 2021.

    While other major donors restored funding to the UNRWA after the conclusion of the investigation in April, the U.S. has yet to do so.

    ‘An unmitigated disaster’

    Israel’s ban of the UNRWA will leave already starving Palestinians without a lifeline. U.N. Secretary General António Guterres said banning the UNRWA “would be a catastrophe in what is already an unmitigated disaster.” The foreign ministers of Canada, Australia, France, Germany, Japan, South Korea and the U.K. issued a joint statement arguing that the ban would have “devastating consequences on an already critical and rapidly deteriorating humanitarian situation, particularly in northern Gaza.”

    Reports have emerged of Israeli plans for private security contractors to take over aid distribution in Gaza through dystopian “gated communities,” which would in effect be internment camps. This would be a troubling move. In contrast to the UNRWA, private contractors have little experience delivering aid and are not dedicated to the humanitarian principles of neutrality, impartiality or independence.

    However, the Knesset’s explicit ban could, inadvertently, force the United States to suspend weapons transfers to Israel. U.S. law requires that it stop weapons transfers to any country that obstructs the delivery of U.S. humanitarian aid. And the U.S. pause on funding for the UNRWA was only meant to be temporary.

    The UNRWA is the main conduit for assistance into Gaza, and the Knesset’s ban makes explicit that the Israeli government is preventing aid delivery, making it harder for Washington to ignore. Before the bill passed, U.S. State Department Spokesperson Matt Miller warned that “passage of the legislation could have implications under U.S. law and U.S. policy.”

    At the same time, two U.S. government agencies previously alerted the Biden administration that Israel was obstructing aid into Gaza, yet weapons transfers have continued unabated.

    Sections of this story were first used in an earlier article published by The Conversation U.S. on Feb. 1, 2024.

    The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. Israel’s ban on UNRWA continues a pattern of politicizing Palestinian refugee aid – and puts millions of lives at risk – https://theconversation.com/israels-ban-on-unrwa-continues-a-pattern-of-politicizing-palestinian-refugee-aid-and-puts-millions-of-lives-at-risk-242379

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI United Nations: Pan-European Strategy aims to align Transport, Health and Environment policies by 2050

    Source: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

    Transport plays a crucial role in society and in the economy, enabling access to jobs, services and people, while driving trade and tourism. However, it also brings significant socioeconomic, environmental and health challenges. In most countries, public policies at all levels do not deal with transport, health, environment, and urban planning issues holistically.

    This is about to change thanks to the adoption of the first Pan-European Strategy on Transport, Health and Environment – the result of a vision that connects transport policies with health and environmental goals. The strategy, adopted today in Geneva at the 22nd session of the Steering Committee of the Transport, Health and Environment Pan-European Programme (THE PEP), lays out a road map for the transformation of transport systems by 2050, promoting sustainable urban mobility, cleaner technologies and climate resilience. This brings synergies with other UNECE initiatives, such as the Inland Transport Committee’s Strategy on Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Inland Transport.

    The strategy aims to:  

    • Recognize the positive role of transport

    The strategy recognizes the transport sector as crucial to sustainable development, promoting health as well as the quality and livability of the environment. By working together, the transport, health and environment sectors can contribute significantly to improving people’s lives.

    • Adopt a holistic approach

    National, regional and local authorities must address transport, health and environmental issues together, in order to develop integrated policies and frameworks. In some countries, financing mechanisms for public transport and infrastructure for walking and cycling are neither sustainable nor adequate. The adoption of a holistic approach will lead to more effective regulations, better budget allocations and improved living conditions.

    • Allow for tailor-made solutions

    The strategy recognizes the diverse realities across the region and calls for tailored solutions that include all stakeholders – Governments, communities, businesses and civil society – to build an inclusive, greener mobility.

    • Support the shift to public transport and active mobility  

    The strategy aims to shift the modal split from the current car-dominated model towards increased public transport and active mobility (cycling and walking). These different modes will need to be treated equally across UNECE member States, with sustainable transport solutions being applied to rural and peri-urban areas. Cargo and freight transport will also become more sustainable. The approach to transport demand will promote proximity to services and enhance sustainable mobility through technology.

    • Address air and noise pollution

    Air pollution is a leading environmental risk to health, causing nearly 570,000 premature deaths in 53 countries of the region according to a 2023 World Health Organization publication. Over 90% of the region’s population is exposed to harmful levels of air pollutants, with road transport being a major source of such pollutants through exhaust and non-exhaust emissions. Road transport accounts for about 25% of energy-related greenhouse gas emissions and is thus a key contributor to climate change.

    The current shift towards vehicle electrification and fleet renewals will allow for the transition to cleaner mobility. At present, transport is the principal source of background noise pollution in urban areas in the region.

    • Maximize health benefits

    Active mobility can significantly reduce health risks, in particular obesity and non-communicable diseases, lessening the burden on healthcare systems. Expanding green spaces and infrastructure for active mobility will also foster mental well-being through greater social interaction.

    • Reinforce social inclusion  

    Lower-income groups tend to live in areas with poorer transport infrastructure, limiting access to services, jobs and social activities. Transport systems also often fail to address the varying needs of people according to gender, age and ability. Road traffic accidents are the main cause of death among people aged 5–29 years worldwide.

    The strategy emphasizes the inclusion of gender, age and disability needs in transport planning, ensuring that mobility is accessible to all. Green finance and fiscal incentives will have an important role to play in driving investment in sustainable transport, creating jobs, and stimulating the economy.

    • Collect and manage data

    The lack or limited quality of data is a recurring challenge and one of the most serious obstacles to informed policymaking in some UNECE member States. This prevents an objective assessment of the impact of transport on the environment and health from being carried out.

    Consistent data on transport, greenhouse gas emissions and mobility will inform policy across the region.

     

    In implementing the Strategy, under the framework of THE PEP, member States will also work on:

    • Directing investments, fiscal incentives and green finance initiatives towards sustainable transport, stimulating job creation and the economy;
    • Making the most of digitalization of transport and mobility services;
    • Increasing the resilience of transport systems to climate change, pandemics and other disasters.

    The next step will be for member States, within the framework of THE PEP and with other stakeholders, to discuss how to implement the Strategy and mobilize the appropriate resources to facilitate implementation, drawing on the knowledge-sharing and good practices of each member State.

    Note to editors

    At the Fifth High-level Meeting on Transport, Health and Environment (Vienna (online), 17–18 May 2021), member States agreed to develop a comprehensive pan-European strategy on transport, health and the environment, including a clear pathway for its implementation, to achieve the agreed vision, and to guide the further work of THE PEP. The Vienna Declaration is available at https://unece.org/pep/publications/vienna-declaration.

    In addition to being the first and only international programme designed to integrate environmental and health aspects into transport, mobility and urban planning policies, THE PEP is a policy framework that brings together the transport, health and environment sectors. It is jointly serviced by UNECE and the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. All member States are invited to actively contribute to and support THE PEP and more information in its regard is available at https://unece.org/thepep.

    MIL OSI United Nations News

  • MIL-OSI Asia-Pac: Economic, trade policies explained

    Source: Hong Kong Information Services

    Secretary for Commerce & Economic Development Algernon Yau today briefed members of the Trade & Industry Advisory Board on major initiatives related to economic and trade developments in the 2024 Policy Address.

    Mr Yau said that the Policy Address announced a series of initiatives, including a reduction of the duty rate for liquor, to create new impetus for Hong Kong’s economic development.

    Currently, the import prices of about 85% of duty-paid liquor in Hong Kong stand at $200 or below, meaning that such products will not benefit from the duty reduction.

    The commerce chief pointed out that this can avoid providing an incentive for citizens to increase liquor consumption as a result of the duty deduction, adding that the proposal has struck a balance between various policy considerations such as facilitating high-end liquor trade, maintaining healthy public finances and safeguarding public health.

    Mr Yau also briefed the members on the proposal introduced in the Policy Address to build a high value-added supply chain service centre.

    He noted that Invest Hong Kong and the Trade Development Council will set up a mechanism and enhance their interfaces for attracting Mainland enterprises to establish international or regional headquarters in Hong Kong for managing offshore trading and supply chains, and providing one-stop diversified professional advisory services for enterprises in Hong Kong looking to go global.

    Mr Yau also highlighted that the Policy Address rolled out various support measures for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), including relaunching the principal moratorium arrangement under the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme, as well as raising the maximum indemnity ratio of the Hong Kong Export Credit Insurance Corporation to 95%.

    Separately, the Trade & Industry Department briefed the meeting attendees on the Second Agreement Concerning Amendment to the Mainland & Hong Kong Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement Agreement on Trade in Services (Amendment Agreement II).

    Mr Yau said the series of measures will provide better support for SMEs while further promoting economic and trade developments, thereby enabling the steady advancement of Hong Kong’s economy.

    MIL OSI Asia Pacific News

  • MIL-OSI USA: U.S. Geological Survey Grants More than $4.8M to States to Preserve Vital Geologic Data and to Support Infrastructure Development 

    Source: US Geological Survey

    Of the $4.8 million to be awarded, $4.08 million comes from investments made by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. Every dollar awarded by the USGS is matched by state geological surveys, doubling the impact of the federal investment. This funding expands the capacity of the USGS NGGDPP to preserve physical samples (e.g., drill cores and geochemical samples) and earth-science assets, which are crucial for future scientific discovery, hazard mitigation, infrastructure development, critical mineral characterization, and climate resilience. 

    The U.S. relies heavily on critical minerals for uses ranging from smartphones and fertilizers to electric vehicles, defense and renewable energy. As supply chain vulnerabilities become a growing concern, interest in domestic resource potential has increased. Data and samples held by state geological surveys are key to identifying critical mineral potential, understanding groundwater resources and geologic hazards and supporting infrastructure projects.  

    Since 2007, the USGS NGGDPP has helped state geological surveys preserve data and samples through annual grants. This year’s funding includes more than $372,000 in appropriated funds from the USGS NGGDPP and an additional $328,000 from the USGS Earth Mapping Resources Initiative, on top of the $4.08 million from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. To support these preservation efforts, state geological surveys will contribute $4.8 million in matching funds. 

    The grants will preserve critical data by improving storage conditions for physical samples, advancing new technological methods to better characterize and use those samples, and driving the development of modern digital infrastructure that enhances public access to these important resources. 

    Various fossil specimens from USGS collection.

    Summary of Successes: Why This Matters 

    • Doubling the Impact: Every dollar awarded is matched by state geological surveys, effectively doubling the federal investment and magnifying its impact. 
    • Advancing Science: The program supports the preservation of crucial geological data and physical samples, enabling future scientific discoveries related to critical minerals, groundwater resources and geologic hazards. 
    • Critical Mineral Resources Support: In support of the USGS Earth Mapping Resources Initiative, the program facilitates the submission of up to 300 samples per state for geochemical analysis of existing geological materials with critical mineral potential. 
    • Infrastructure Development: Improvement in physical storage conditions preserves the long-term availability of samples and cores for new research without costly reacquisition (AR, AZ, IN, MO, MT, NE, NM, OH, WV). 
    • Data Modernization: Updating data formats and improving digital access to these resources ensures that scientists, policymakers and the public can leverage this valuable information efficiently. An example is well log digitization and conversion to industry standard formats for web access (FL, ID, IN).  

    More information about the National Geological and Geophysical Data Preservation Program and its grants can be found at the NGGDPP website.

    For more information about how the USGS is investing funding received from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law can be found on the USGS BIL website. 

    MIL OSI USA News