Category: Europe

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Strategic Dialogue with the defence industry in the context of the White Paper for European Defence Readiness 2030 – E-002087/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002087/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Hannah Neumann (Verts/ALE)

    On 12 May 2025, a Strategic Dialogue between the Commission – represented by President von der Leyen and Commissioner for Defence and Space Kubilius – and the defence industry took place. This was followed on 19 May by an Implementation Dialogue with Commissioner Kubilius. Both events are part of the White Paper for European Defence Readiness 2030[1] process and aim to capture the industry’s perspective ahead of the Defence Omnibus.

    The Strategic Dialogue was organised with limited transparency: invitations were sent at short notice, the list of participating companies was limited and no information has been made public on the inputs from industry or the Commission’s response. President von der Leyen named six key challenges: fragmentation of demand and supply, regulatory barriers, access to raw materials, rapid innovation cycles, access to finance and skilled labour shortages. Small groups were formed to continue the exchange.

    I would therefore like to ask the Commission:

    • 1.What concrete industry inputs and demands were discussed, how did the Commission respond and what measures were considered in response to the six challenges?
    • 2.Does the Commission plan a regular dialogue with the defence industry beyond the omnibus, and how will transparency regarding participation and the content of discussions in future dialogues be ensured?
    • 3.On what basis were participating organisations selected?

    Submitted: 23.5.2025

    • [1] JOIN(2025)0120.
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Transgender healthcare and the cross-border healthcare directive – E-002089/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002089/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Lynn Boylan (The Left)

    Within Ireland, the transgender community regularly rely on Directive 2011/24/EU[1]. There is no national policy for transgender healthcare, and available services are limited within the country. The main publicly-funded gender clinic is estimated to have a 2000 person, 13 year waiting list for new referrals for assessment, and requires a complete assessment for all patients, including those previously diagnosed and receiving treatment from other services.

    • 1.Considering the Directive and the case of W.W. v Poland – ECHR 31842/20, should patients who have been diagnosed and received treatment in other Member States, either publicly or privately, and who subsequently move to Ireland, be able to continue their care in Ireland, that is, without having to wait 13 years for a complete reassessment and without their treatment being interrupted while waiting?
    • 2.Considering Article 8.5 and Article 8.6.d of the Directive, would a 13-year wait to begin assessment generally be considered timely and medically justifiable for cross-border healthcare to be approved for medically necessary healthcare?
    • 3.Should private services, including private health insurance, accept referrals and diagnoses from medical professionals registered in other Member States, as they would from equivalent Irish-registered medical professionals?

    Submitted: 23.5.2025

    • [1] Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2011 on the application of patients’ rights in cross-border healthcare, OJ L 88, 4.4.2011, p. 45, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/24/oj.
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Timeline and process for the review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement – P-002105/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002105/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Rima Hassan (The Left)

    A majority of EU Foreign Affairs Ministers have called for a review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement. The responsibility now lies with the Commission to assess whether the policies of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government are compatible with the respect for fundamental rights, as required under Article 2 of the Agreement.

    We urge the Commission to ensure that this review lives up to its mission as the ‘guardian of the Treaties’ (Article 17 TEU), and ask it to clarify:

    • 1.What is the timeline and process for the review of the EU-Israel Association Agreement?
    • 2.What process or approach is being used for this assessment?

    Submitted: 26.5.2025

    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – The impact of the EU Critical Raw Materials Act on environmental criteria and the treatment of protected areas – E-002086/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002086/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Li Andersson (The Left)

    The aim of the EU Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) is to ensure that 10 % of the EU’s needs for strategic raw materials are met with materials produced on its territory. This will bring to the fore the environmental and social effects of mining that had previously been hidden owing to the EU’s importing of its minerals, mainly from the Global South.

    A project that meets the criteria laid down in Article 6 of the CMRA can obtain the status of a strategic project. Under those criteria, projects must be implemented sustainably, in particular as regards the monitoring, prevention and minimisation of environmental impacts. However, strategic status allows for accelerated permitting procedures and derogations from environmental directives such as the Habitats and Water Framework directives.

    In Finland, the first strategic projects have raised environmental concerns. The expansion of Terrafame, a mining company, was partially overturned by an administrative court, partly because of the risk of a major accident. On the other hand, the Sakatti mining project is being planned in the area of Viiankiaapa, which is home to one of Europe’s last string bogs (also known as aapa mires). The site is protected under both Natura and Finland’s national marshland protection scheme. The environmental impact assessment procedure has already shown that the mine would cause the water level in the mire to drop. As a result the grounds for protecting it would be lost and, ultimately, the mire would be destroyed.

    • 1.When the first sites with strategic project status in Finland are clearly environmentally destructive, the question arises as to what exactly the environmental criteria are for obtaining strategic project status?
    • 2.Has the EU created a gap in its high level of environmental protection with regard to mining projects by establishing derogations from the most effective directives in EU environmental legislation – the Nature and Water Framework directives – with a view to stepping up strategic autonomy?
    • 3.How will environmental protection with regard to mining projects be implemented in the future, and when it is possible for sites protected by nature conservation schemes to be used for mining projects, does the EU have any zones which are identified as absolutely prohibited areas?

    Submitted: 23.5.2025

    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Energy sovereignty and Turkish interference – how is Greece being protected? – E-001887/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-001887/2025/rev.1
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Afroditi Latinopoulou (PfE)

    The energy sovereignty of EU Member States is a key element of both national security and the EU’s common energy strategy. Greece is facing continual external pressure from Türkiye, which is carrying out illegal exploration and drilling activities in maritime zones under Greek sovereignty or jurisdiction, in violation of international law.

    Turkish interference in the Eastern Mediterranean not only undermines Greece’s sovereign rights, but also jeopardises energy stability and the European strategy for ending dependence on external energy providers. The Commission’s inaction in relation to this ongoing challenge raises legitimate concerns about its effectiveness in protecting the EU’s interests.

    Can the Commission therefore answer the following:

    • 1.How can it help to ensure Greece’s energy sovereignty while Türkiye is carrying out illegal drilling and research activities within the Greek continental shelf and EEZ?
    • 2.What action has it taken to prevent non-EU countries from undermining the EU’s energy security, at a time when Greece is being confronted with constant pressure and disputes over its maritime sovereignty from Türkiye?
    • 3.Does it consider that tolerating Turkish interference in the Eastern Mediterranean is compatible with the EU’s commitments to defending the sovereignty of the Member States and reinforcing the EU’s energy independence?

    Submitted: 12.5.2025

    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU dependence on Russia in the ITER nuclear fusion project and the roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports – E-002074/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002074/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Andrea Wechsler (PPE), Borys Budka (PPE), Matej Tonin (PPE)

    The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) aims to achieve fusion power production at power plant scale. The Russian Federation is part of the project.

    In its recent roadmap towards ending Russian energy imports[1], the Commission announced further steps to reduce its dependence on them. However, it remains silent on the topic of fusion energy and, as a result, on the membership, governance involvement, funding (9.1 %) and intellectual property contributions to ITER from the Russian Federation. Moreover, Russia is largely contributing ‘in kind’ through, for instance, the delivery of components for the power supply and protection of the superconducting magnets.

    • 1.How does the Commission plan to phase out dependence on Russian participation in ITER in relation to membership, government involvement, funding and contributions in kind, and what role could the proposal for the European radioisotope valley initiative play in this context?
    • 2.How does the Commission plan to secure the operation of ITER in the light of the dependency on Russian intellectual property rights?
    • 3.Will the Commission support the establishment of an independent EU fusion energy project and a diversification of the fusion industry landscape through increased funding to private sector companies?

    Submitted: 22.5.2025

    • [1] COM(2025)0440.
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Proposed liquefied natural gas facility in Pesaro, Italy – E-002065/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002065/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Carola Rackete (The Left)

    In view of the ongoing construction approval for a liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility in Pesaro (Italy), which has been granted on a site classified as high-risk (R4 floodplain, seismic zone with sand liquefaction, and proximity to homes and schools), and considering that the project was approved without a full set of environmental and safety documents, including an updated internal emergency plan, hydrogeological assessment and cumulative risk modelling:

    • 1.Is the Commission aware of this case?
    • 2.Will the Commission assess whether Italy is in breach of the EU precautionary principle (Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union), the Seveso III Directive[1] (2012/18/EU), and the Aarhus Convention in relation to this and similar projects authorised via the Simplification Decree (DL 76/2020)?

    Submitted: 22.5.2025

    • [1] Directive 2012/18/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances, OJ L 197, 24.7.2012, p. 1, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2012/18/oj.
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Forum for Nagorno-Karabakh proposed by the Swiss Parliament – E-002049/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002049/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Nicolas Bay (ECR)

    The Swiss Parliament recently proposed organising a forum for dialogue with representatives of Azerbaijan and Nagorno-Karabakh within the next year to discuss the conditions for the return of Armenian populations displaced from the region. To ensure its effectiveness, the forum will need to be organised in coordination with international organisations[1].

    In this context, the active participation of the European Union in the organisation of this forum would send a strong signal of its support for lasting peace in the region and respect for the rights of displaced populations.

    Will the Commission take full part in the organisation of this forum, alongside the Swiss authorities and other international actors, in order to ensure its success?

    Submitted: 21.5.2025

    • [1] https://www.parlament.ch/en/ratsbetrieb/suche-curia-vista/geschaeft?AffairId=20244259
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Integration of digital creativity and video game development into secondary education curricula in the EU – E-002063/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002063/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Andi Cristea (S&D)

    Romania has recently approved a new high school curriculum entitled ‘Video Game Development’, as an integrated optional subject in upper secondary education (high school), under the ‘Curriculum at the School’s Decision’ framework.

    This curriculum fosters digital skills, creativity and project-based learning by combining programming, digital art, design, storytelling and teamwork. The video game sector is a fast-growing part of the European digital economy and a key domain for innovation and youth engagement.

    In view of this development and in line with the EU’s Digital Education Action Plan and Creative Europe programme:

    • 1.In what ways does the Commission encourage Member States to incorporate digital creative industries, such as video game development, into their secondary education curricula or facilitate this, given that education policy remains a national competency?
    • 2.Would the Commission be willing to develop or promote a set of European guidelines or a best-practice framework to support Member States interested in integrating video game development and digital storytelling into their education systems, considering that education is primarily a national responsibility?

    Submitted: 22.5.2025

    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Sorbonne declaration: the EU prefers US researchers – E-002058/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002058/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Catherine Griset (PfE), Aleksandar Nikolic (PfE), Virginie Joron (PfE), Gilles Pennelle (PfE), Julie Rechagneux (PfE), Fabrice Leggeri (PfE), Séverine Werbrouck (PfE), Christophe Bay (PfE), Pierre Pimpie (PfE), Pascale Piera (PfE)

    On 5 May 2025, at the ‘Choose Europe for Science’ event at La Sorbonne, Ursula von der Leyen announced a EUR 500 million plan to woo US researchers to the EU in response to budget cuts by the Trump administration.

    Emmanuel Macron has declared his support for this initiative, pledging EUR 100 million from France.

    This initiative raises concerns given that French scientists regularly warn that national research is underfunded and young researchers are in a precarious position.

    • 1.Can the Commission provide details of how this initiative will be funded and what criteria will be used to award the grants, notably how it will guarantee transparency and political neutrality when selecting the recipients?
    • 2.What mechanisms will it put in place to ensure that this plan also benefits European researchers, especially those in the Member States most affected by brain drain and lack of funding?
    • 3.What measures will it take to ensure that this initiative does not lead to unfair competition between European and foreign researchers, in particular as regards working conditions and funding?

    Supporters[1]

    Submitted: 22.5.2025

    • [1] This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Marie-Luce Brasier-Clain (PfE), Julien Leonardelli (PfE)
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Lack of respect for civil partnerships among EU Member States – E-001135/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The free movement acquis provides for the compulsory recognition of partnerships for the exercise of the rights derived from EU law.

    If the registered partnership is recognised by the host Member State as equivalent to marriage, the partner of the mobile EU citizen falls under the definition of core family member[1].

    If not, the partner can be considered as an extended family member if the partnership is durable[2]. Since Directive 2004/38/EC on free movement[3] is gender-neutral, the recognition obligation applies to both same-sex and opposite-sex partnerships.

    Substantive family law, including rules on the definition of marriage and registered partnership, falls within the competence of the Member States.

    The obligation to recognise a marriage or a partnership is currently, under EU law, limited to the recognition for the exercise of the rights derived from EU law.

    The EU has not adopted rules on the recognition of marriage or registered partnerships for the purposes of rights derived from national law (such as maintenance, property regimes and succession). This recognition is currently governed by the national law of each Member State.

    However, the EU has adopted gender-neutral instruments on family law with cross-border implications and succession that apply to all couples, including same-sex couples[4]. These instruments aim to facilitate Member States’ recognition of each other’s judgments on these matters.

    Whether a partnership must be dissolved before a marriage can be concluded is not a matter covered by EU law. It is for the Member States to provide their own legislation.

    In the specific situation referred to in the question, the obligation to dissolve the registered partnership may not depend on whether the couple is of same or opposite sex.

    • [1] According to Article 2(2)(b) of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, OJ 30.04.2204, L 158, p. 77.
    • [2] Article 3(2)(b) of Directive 2004/38/EC.
    • [3] Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States, OJ 30.04.2204, L 158, p. 77 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32004L0038.
    • [4] Council Regulation (EU) 2019/1111 of 25 June 2019 on jurisdiction, the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, and on international child abduction, OJ, L 178, 02/07/2019, p. 1; Council Regulation (EC) No 4/2009 of 18 December 2008 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and cooperation in matters relating to maintenance obligations, OJ L 7, 10/01/2009, p. 1-79; Council Regulation (EU) 2016/1104 of 24 June 2016 implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of jurisdiction, applicable law and the recognition and enforcement of decisions in matters of the property consequences of registered partnerships, OJ L 183, 8.7.2016, p. 30-56; Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on jurisdiction, applicable law, recognition and enforcement of decisions and acceptance and enforcement of authentic instruments in matters of succession and on the creation of a European Certificate of Succession, OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p. 107-134.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Emergence and monitoring of DeepSeek – E-000712/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission assesses on an ongoing basis possible security concerns associated with DeepSeek artificial intelligence (AI) models.

    Open-source general-purpose AI (GPAI) models, such as DeepSeek, placed on the EU market must comply with the GPAI obligations of the EU AI Act[1] if the models present systemic risks.

    These include technical documentation, model evaluations, assessment and mitigation of systemic risks, and cybersecurity protection. These rules enter into application on 2 August 2025 and will ensure that GPAI models available to EU users are safe and trustworthy.

    Moreover, any transfer of personal data to China by DeepSeek needs to take place in compliance with the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which safeguards the fundamental right to privacy and personal data protection. The enforcement of the GDPR is the competence of the national data protection authorities in the Member States.

    The Commission also observes relevant developments in Member States and third countries . DeepSeek is banned on devices used in the Australian government and the Danish Parliament, while the Italian data protection authority blocked DeepSeek, as the model provider failed to comply with privacy rules. Taiwan advises against its use by government officials, and the United States are considering a government device ban.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj/eng.
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – EU funding of the Palestinian Authority – E-002057/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Question for written answer  E-002057/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Bert-Jan Ruissen (ECR), Lukas Mandl (PPE), Niclas Herbst (PPE), Alice Teodorescu Måwe (PPE), Fernand Kartheiser (ECR), Kristoffer Storm (ECR), Rihards Kols (ECR), Miriam Lexmann (PPE), Sebastian Tynkkynen (ECR), Antonio López-Istúriz White (PPE), Elena Donazzan (ECR), Beatrice Timgren (ECR), Dick Erixon (ECR), Charlie Weimers (ECR), Assita Kanko (ECR), Tomáš Zdechovský (PPE), Sander Smit (PPE)

    Following the signing of the letter of intent between the Commission and the Palestinian Authority (PA) in July 2024, the Commission launched a comprehensive funding programme worth up to EUR 1.6 billion for the period from 2025 to 2027. As a condition, substantial reforms were imposed aiming to establish a democratic, transparent and efficient governance system within the PA. Given the PA’s problematic record on governance and accountability, doubts may arise about whether these conditions will actually be implemented and effectively monitored.

    • 1.Can the Commission specify the content and scope of the programme, the conditions and the reform matrix agreed on by the PA, as referred to in the letter of intent and further communication on the funding of the PA?
    • 2.What specific mechanisms are in place to ensure the PA’s adherence to the conditions linked to the EU funding, and will the Commission disclose to the public the reform steps taken by the PA?
    • 3.What measures is the Commission taking to ensure that the Palestinian ‘pay-for-slay’ scheme is ended and do these measures include suspension of EU funding if the scheme continues?

    Submitted: 22.5.2025

    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Foreign entities funding EU media – E-001452/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission does not have an overview of media supported by US organisations and has no authority to ask funders or their beneficiaries to share that information.

    The EU has taken several measures to safeguard media independence and prevent undue influence from third countries. The provisions of the European Media Freedom Act[1], applicable from 8 August 2025, establish transparency requirements for media ownership and state advertising revenues, including from third-country public authorities or entities.

    They also mandate that public funds for state advertising in media or supply or service contracts with media be allocated using transparent, proportionate, and non-discriminatory criteria.

    The Commission also co-finances the Media Pluralism Monitor[2] and a media ownership monitoring project[3]. However, these measures do not include monitoring of external funding.

    The Commission has no detailed information on the extent to which foreign subsidies received by EU media and journalists are subject to income tax in their country of residence. Support to the press and the media often takes the form of tax credits or lower VAT rates, irrespective of the source of income.

    Such taxation falls within the competence of Member States, who have the right to design and organise their own tax systems, provided they abide by the provisions of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.

    • [1] https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=OJ:L_202401083.
    • [2] https://cmpf.eui.eu/media-pluralism-monitor-2024/.
    • [3] https://media-ownership.eu/.
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Written question – Plant for the desalination of brackish water from the sources of the River Tara – P-002102/2025

    Source: European Parliament

    Priority question for written answer  P-002102/2025
    to the Commission
    Rule 144
    Cristina Guarda (Verts/ALE), Leoluca Orlando (Verts/ALE), Ignazio Roberto Marino (Verts/ALE)

    The desalination plant on the River Tara[1], built using NRRP funds, poses a serious risk to the ecosystems of the Tara, the Mar Grande and the Mar Piccolo in Apulia. Apulia’s regional environmental agency and the Special Superintendency for the NRRP opposed its construction.

    It fails to fully uphold the ‘do no significant harm’ (DNSH) principle and is at odds with key European environmental legislation, including: Directive 2000/60/EC, given that extracting water disrupts the natural flow of the River Tara, which has serious repercussions for ecosystem services; Directive 92/43/EEC and Directive 2009/147/EC, as reducing water flow poses a threat to species of Community interest and protected species such as the otter (Lutra lutra); Directive 2011/92/EU (EIA Directive), as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU, in the absence of an assessment of the cumulative effects of brine discharge in the Mar Grande, which would alter trophic cycles and undermine mussel farming; Regulation (EU) 2021/241 and (EU) 2020/852, with reference to the DNSH principle; Directive 2014/52/EU (amending Directive 2011/92/EU), as the EIA was not approved before the end of the single and final approval procedure joint meetings. What is more, no formal DNSH assessment was carried out in the environmental impact assessment.

    In the light of the above:

    • 1.Does the Commission think that those EU directives have been breached?
    • 2.Does it believe the project was worthy of NRRP financing?

    Supporter[2]

    Submitted: 26.5.2025

    • [1] https://openpnrr.it/progetti/118664/.
    • [2] This question is supported by a Member other than the authors: Benedetta Scuderi (Verts/ALE)
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Risks of the Meta AI tool – E-001460/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Commission is aware that certain aspects of Meta’s new Meta artificial intelligence (AI) feature fall within the scope of the Digital Services Act (DSA)[1] and is closely monitoring its deployment.

    Under the DSA, providers of designated Very Large Online Platforms, such as Facebook and Instagram, are required to diligently identify, analyse, assess, and mitigate systemic risks presented by their services in the EU.

    These risk assessments are mandated at least annually and must also occur prior to deploying any functionalities that could significantly impact a platform’s risk profile[2].

    The Commission’s DSA enforcement team is in continuous dialogue with Meta concerning the launch of their Meta AI feature. Meta is currently proactively cooperating with the Commission’s inquiries and is expected to submit to the Commission the related risk assessment report shortly.

    Upon its receipt, the Commission will carefully analyse all relevant documentation to verify compliance with the DSA and follow-up accordingly as appropriate.

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on a Single Market For Digital Services and amending Directive 2000/31/EC (Digital Services Act), OJ L 277, 27.10.2022, p. 1.
    • [2] Article 34(1) of the DSA.
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Transformation of the EU – from peace project to war economy – E-001164/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The European Union was founded as a peace project — and it remains one. But peace is not self-sustaining. In an era of rising threats, the Union and its Member States must be prepared to defend themselves and to deter any actor that seeks to challenge EU security or weaken EU democracies.

    The Union and its Member States need to be ready, even for the most extreme military contingencies such as armed aggression. This is the goal of the ReArm Europe Plan and the White Paper on European Defence — Readiness 2030[1].

    The Commission proposal for the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) instrument is fully in line with the Treaty. Once adopted, it will provide loans to Member States to help them boost their defence capabilities through common procurement. This will reinforce the competitiveness and readiness of the European defence industry.

    While defence remains firmly within national competence, and Member States retain full sovereignty over their armed forces — from doctrine to deployment — the EU plays a complementary role. The evolving security landscape requires enhanced cooperation among Member States, including in the field of defence.

    The Treaty on European Union, particularly Article 42, provides a legal basis for developing a Common Security and Defence Policy, which respects the specific character of national defence policies.

    Recent defence related initiatives aim to support and enhance national efforts, particularly by reinforcing the European Defence Technological and Industrial Base, which is a critical pillar of the EU’s overall defence readiness.

    • [1] https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/e6d5db69-e0ab-4bec-9dc0-3867b4373019_en?filename=White%20paper%20for%20European%20defence%20%E2%80%93%20Readiness%202030.pdf.
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Answer to a written question – Compliance check on online second-hand goods traders and consumer rights protection – E-001214/2025(ASW)

    Source: European Parliament

    The Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) Network[1] of national authorities, facilitated by the Commission, operates to increase compliance with EU consumer legislation, such as the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive.

    A notable example of a CPC enforcement action concerning online sales of second-hand goods is the one against Vinted, successfully concluded in June 2024.[2]

    Following the 2025 sweep on online traders of second-hand goods, national authorities will decide the appropriate follow up in relation to the 185 traders identified for further investigation.

    They can require traders to comply with their obligations under the Consumer Rights Directive 2011/83/EU[3] and the Sale of Goods Directive,[4] following respective national procedures.

    Although the Commission lacks direct enforcement powers in this field, it plays a crucial role in coordinating many CPC Network activities, such as sweeps, and supporting authorities with clarifications and digital infrastructure (EU eLab).

    It also organises regular CPC Network meetings and seminars to enhance knowledge and collaboration across authorities. In addition, consumers have access to different means of individual and collective redress, such as alternative dispute resolution and representative actions.[5]

    The power to impose sanctions on traders always lies solely with the national authorities and courts within the current legal framework. To strengthen enforcement and better protect consumers against EU-wide law breaches while ensuring fair competition, the Commission is considering reviewing the CPC Regulation.[6]

    • [1] Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 on cooperation between national authorities responsible for the enforcement of consumer protection laws and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004.
    • [2] Following a dialogue with the Commission and the CPC Network, Vinted improved its pricing information to bring their practices more in line with EU consumer law. For more, please see: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_24_3292.
    • [3] Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, OJ L 304, 22.11.2011, p. 64-88.
    • [4] Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods, amending Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and Directive 2009/22/EC, and repealing Directive 1999/44/EC, OJ L 136, 22.5.2019, p. 28-50.
    • [5] Directive (EU) 2020/1828 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2020 on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers and repealing Directive 2009/22/EC.
    • [6] See p. 17 of the https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0037.
    Last updated: 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Europe: Highlights – SEDE, ENVI and LIBE presentation on the EU Preparedness Union Strategy – 3 June 2025 – Committee on Security and Defence

    Source: European Parliament

    floods_scribo.jpg © STRINGER / AFP

    On 26 March, the Commission and the European External Action Service (EEAS) jointly launched the new EU Preparedness Union Strategy, which will be presented in a joint meeting of the SEDE, ENVI, and LIBE committees, on 3 June. The strategy outlines how the EU aims to better anticipate, prevent and respond to risks such as cyberattacks, disinformation, and climate impacts.

    The EU Preparedness Union Strategy is a direct follow-up to the Niinistö Report’s recommendations on strengthening the EU’s preparedness. It proposes 30 key actions and an Action Plan to improve Europe’s ability to manage risks ranging from cyber threats and disinformation to climate change. The strategy calls for a shared European approach, recognising preparedness as not just a national but a Union-wide responsibility. It promotes a “preparedness by design” culture across all EU policies. The initiative is led by Commissioner Hadja Lahbib, responsible for equality, preparedness, and crisis management, including civil preparedness and international cooperation on disaster risk management. The strategy highlights the need for stronger coordination and resilience mechanisms across the EU in response to growing and complex threats.

    MIL OSI Europe News

  • MIL-OSI Economics: Introducing Bing Video Creator: Create videos with your words for free

    Source: Microsoft

    Headline: Introducing Bing Video Creator: Create videos with your words for free

    Questions deserve answers, ideas beg for realization, and curiosity seeks satisfaction. Two years ago, we brought this belief forward with Bing Image Creator, helping users everywhere create whatever they can imagine through words—for free. Last month, we continued the next evolution of search with Copilot Search in Bing, blending the best of traditional and generative search to meet you where you are at in your discovery journey.

    Today we’re taking the next leap with Bing Video Creator, allowing you to turn your ideas into videos, for free. Powered by Sora, Bing Video Creator transforms your text prompts into short videos. Just describe what you want to see and watch your vision come to life. 

    [embedded content]
    Bing, as your AI-powered search and answer engine, not only helps you find what you need, but gives you the freedom to create exactly what you’re looking for. 

    Bing Video Creator is free and is rolling out starting today on the Bing Mobile App and coming soon to desktop and within Copilot Search. To get started, download the Bing Mobile app.

    Bringing creation to your fingertips

    Bing Video Creator represents our efforts to democratize the power of AI video generation. We believe creativity should be effortless and accessible to help you satisfy your answer-seeking process.

    Whether you’re letting your imagination run wild, bringing a story to life, or looking for that perfect video to communicate what you’re thinking, Bing Video Creator puts the power of video creation at your fingertips. We’re excited to empower anyone to turn their words into wonder through an AI-generated video.

    How to use Bing Video Creator

    Getting started with Bing Video Creator is easy. Open Video Creator within the Bing Mobile app by clicking on the menu in the bottom right corner and selecting “Video Creator.” You can also type directly into the Bing mobile app search bar “Create a video of…” for quick access to video creation. Once Bing Video Creator becomes available on desktop, you can visit Bing.com/create.

    Open the Bing app and click on the menu in the bottom right corner, then select “Video Creator.”

    Then, simply type in a description of the video you want to create in the prompt box. The best prompts provide additional context, description, and detail. Click “Create” and let AI generate your video. Feel free to continue dreaming up new videos – you’ll receive a notification when your video is ready to view. 

    Check out this fun prompt below: “In a busy Italian pizza restaurant, a small otter works as a chef and wears a chef’s hat and an apron. He kneads the dough with his paws and is surrounded by other pizza ingredients.”

    Videos are 5 seconds long and can be created in 9:16 format with 16:9 format coming soon. You can also queue up to three video generations at a time. If all three slots are in use, you’ll need to wait for one to finish before starting another.

    Once your video is done generating, you’ll receive a convenient notification informing you your video is ready. You can choose to download the video, share it via email or via your favorite social media platforms, or copy and a share a direct link to the video.

    Your creations are stored for up to 90 days, giving you plenty of time to download, share, or refine your prompts. 

    Video creation is free to all users, with the ability to choose between Fast and Standard generation speeds. Start with 10 Fast creations to let your imagination come to life in seconds. After that, keep the creative juices flowing uninterrupted by redeeming 100 Microsoft Rewards points for each Fast creation or continue with Standard creation speeds.*

    Bing Video Creator is rolling out starting today Worldwide (Excluding China and Russia).

    Use cases and inspiration

    Bing Video Creator is for anyone with a story to tell. Here are some ways you can use it:

    1. Special moments: Need a quick, compelling visual to commemorate a special moment? Generate a short video that brings it to life!

    2. Communication: Turn your idea into something easy to understand, a joke into a lasting memory, or add a customized experience to your everyday conversations. Or stand out in the scroll by sharing your creation to social media.

    3. Discover: Brainstorming is now easier than ever with the ability to test creative directions, explore different styles, bring to life objects, build mood boards, and more. It’s a great way to let your curiosity roam free and discover what you can imagine.

    Tips and tricks

    Whether you’re just starting out or looking to refine your AI-generated videos, these tips will help you unlock the full potential of Bing Video Creator.

    1. Be Descriptive with Your Prompts 
    The more vivid and specific your prompt, the better the results. Instead of “a person walking,” try “a young woman in a red coat walking through a snowy forest at sunrise.” The more detail, the better. Including camera angles and lighting also helps the model deliver what you are looking for.

    2. Use Action-Oriented and Scene-setting Language 
    Verbs like “dancing,” “exploring,” or “transforming” help the AI understand motion and intent, resulting in more dynamic visuals. Adjectives like “cinematic,” “sunny,” or “dreamy,” help craft the overall feeling of the video.

    3. Experiment with Tone and Style 
    Want something cinematic? Add “in the style of a movie trailer.” Looking for something playful? Try “animated like a cartoon.” Prompt modifiers can dramatically shift the aesthetic

    Responsible AI

    At Microsoft, our teams are guided by our Responsible AI principles and the Responsible AI Standard to help them develop and deploy AI systems responsibly. To curb the potential misuse of Video Creator, we have utilized OpenAI’s existing Sora safeguards and incorporated additional protections to deliver an experience that encourages responsible use of Video Creator. For example, we have put controls in place that aim to limit the generation of harmful or unsafe videos. When our system detects that a potentially harmful video could be generated by a prompt, it blocks the prompt and warns the user. For each video created using Bing Video Creator we have implemented content credentials and provenance based on the C2PA standard to help users identify AI generated videos. 

    Try Bing Video Creator today

    We’re excited to see what you create with Bing Video Creator. We’re continuing to refine and evolve the experience as we bring video generation to more users. Try Bing Video Creator today: https://aka.ms/TryBingVideoCreator

    The Bing team

    *Up to 10 Fast creations per user. Thereafter, creations will be processed at the Standard speed. To continue using Fast creations, users may redeem 100 Microsoft Rewards points for each video. Learn more about earning Rewards points here.

    MIL OSI Economics

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: expert reaction to unpublished conference abstract suggesting eating rate has sustained effects on energy intake from Ultra-Processed Diets

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    A conference abstract presented at NUTRITION 2025 looks at eating rate and its effects on energy intake from Ultra-Processed Diets. 

    Dr Amanda Avery, Associate Professor in Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Nottingham, said:

    “This very well considered study explores whether eating rate can make a difference to the amount of food we eat. Previous research has suggested that a 20% difference in eating rate leads to a 9-15% difference in food intake.

    “In this study, the abstract being showcased at the American Nutrition conference,  the researchers used two different diets using commercially prepared ultra processed foods (UPFs). One diet used UPFs with textures that meant that eating rate was slower whilst the second diet used UPFs with textures leading to faster eating rates.

    “Healthy young adults, both males and females with healthy body weights were invited to take part in the study where they were then randomised to be in one ‘block’ or the second block for assignment to the diet. They were not aware which diet they were consuming when – they had one diet for two weeks, then had a two week ‘rest’ and then had the second diet for two weeks. This means that we can compare the results between individuals besides between the two groups.

    “The participants were offered as much food as they wanted when on either of the two diets. Incredibly, but perhaps not surprisingly, the findings on energy intake were consistent – all participants consumed less energy from food when on the two week UPF – slow eating rate diet. The average energy intake was 369kcal/day less when people were following the slow eating rate diet.

    “Whilst there were no significant differences in body weight, this is not surprising given that the study was only being conducted for a two-week period and because participants were switched from one diet to another. However if a person was choosing a diet which led to an extra 350+kcal being consumed each day, then one could expect to see associated increases in body weight over time. 

    “As mentioned, the study was well conducted with many reasons as to why participants may not be able to take part in the study. The researchers were keen to exclude anyone who had strict control over their food intake and also those people who were intentionally trying to reduce their body weight – thus other factors that may have contributed to the findings were limited in the study design.

    “In terms of what this study adds – the study really reinforces the importance of people sitting down and taking time to enjoy their food. Eating foods quickly and ‘on the hoof’ may lead to extra energy intake which may long-term lead to weight gain. Ideally, we should be choosing foods with more texture, such as ultra-processed foods with more texture, but also balanced with vegetables, whole fruits, wholegrain cereals, beans, legumes, lean meat, fish, so that we have to chew the food. As this study has found, food with very little texture, such as certain UPFs, may lead to excess energy intake which over time may increase the risk of obesity, as demonstrated by other studies that have compared the intake of ultra processed with more minimally processed foods.”

     

    Professor Julian Hamilton-Shield, Professor in Diabetes and Metabolic Endocrinology, University of Bristol, said:

    “This study reinforces previous epidemiological, experimental and clinical trial data demonstrating that any manoeuvre to slow eating rate consistently, in this current study by meal texture, reduces an individual’s total calorie intake. Whilst it can be difficult to sustain a reduced eating speed, altering food texture that slows eating speed seems an attractive additional tool for population-based, weight management strategies.”  

    The abstract ‘Eating Rate has Sustained Effects on Energy Intake from Ultra-Processed Diets: A Two-Week Ad Libitum Dietary Randomized Controlled Trial’ by Ciarán G. Forde et al. was presented at the NUTRITION 2025 conference, and the embargo lifted at 19:00 UK time Monday 2 June 2025.

    Declared interests

    Professor Julian Hamilton-Shield: I have conducted experimental and trial studies on slowing eating speed by different methodology, finding results for calorie intake in agreement with the study being described

    Dr Amanda Avery: besides my academic position, I also hold a very part-time position as Consultant dietitian in Nutrition, Research & Health Policy at Slimming World.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Russia: IMF Executive Board Concludes 2025 Article IV Consultation with Cyprus

    Source: IMF – News in Russian

    June 2, 2025

    • Growth is expected to decelerate to 2.5 percent in 2025 and stabilize at 3 percent in the medium term as Cyprus shifts towards more investment-driven growth.
    • The fiscal surplus reached an impressive 4.3 percent of GDP in 2024, while public debt declined to 65 percent of GDP. Fiscal policy should continue to prioritize debt reduction to further build buffers against potential shocks.
    • The banking sector boasts substantial capital and liquidity buffers, with financial risks appearing well-contained. The recent tightening of the macroprudential policy stance, will further enhance these financial buffers.

    Washington, DC: The Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) completed the Article IV Consultation for Cyprus and endorsed the staff appraisal without a meeting.[1] The authorities have consented to the publication of the Staff Report prepared for this consultation.[2]

    In 2024, Cyprus’s growth accelerated to 3.4 percent—one of the highest rates in the euro area (EA)—driven by a strong tourism season, continued Information and Communication Technology (ICT) sector expansion, and robust public and private consumption. While inflation has remained volatile, it has generally decreased, with headline inflation falling to 2.1 percent by March 2025. Fiscal performance continues to be very strong, with the fiscal surplus increasing to 4.3 percent of GDP in 2024, supported by robust tax revenues. As a result, public debt has declined to 65 percent of GDP by the end of 2024, while cash buffers remain large. Financial conditions remain tight, accompanied by subdued credit growth. Nevertheless, the banking sector possesses sizable capital and liquidity buffers, and overall banking sector risks appear contained.

    Growth is expected to moderate to 2.5 percent in 2025 before reaching 3 percent in the medium term, driven by higher investment and structural reforms. Inflation is anticipated to hit the 2 percent target later this year, supported by moderating growth and lower oil prices. Near-term risks are tilted to the downside, including from elevated uncertainty from global trade tensions. In contrast, longer-term risks are more balanced, with risks on insufficient progress on structural reforms acting against the upside potential of Cyprus’s evolving business model.

    Executive Board Assessment

    In concluding the 2025 Article IV consultation with Cyprus, Executive Directors endorsed staff’s appraisal, as follows:

    Cyprus has demonstrated remarkable economic resilience, with growth among the highest in the EA. This strong performance is underpinned by robust service exports and domestic consumption. The labor market remains tight, characterized by a declining unemployment rate and elevated job vacancy levels. While uncertainties persist, there are indications of potential overheating in the economy. This, along with tariff-related trade disruption, will lead growth to moderate this year. While volatile, inflation is projected to stabilize around 2 percent by the end of the year. The current account deficit is estimated to have moderated in 2024, but the external position is assessed to be weaker than the level implied by fundamentals.

    The immediate outlook presents downside risks, while longer-term risks appear more balanced. An escalation of trade conflicts—particularly if this broadened to include services trade and FDI—poses an important downside risk. An escalation of regional tensions, and possible new energy price shocks, could affect FDI, tourism, and inflation. Domestically, there are concerns about further overheating, which may arise from a more accommodative fiscal policy. In the medium-to-long term, investment-driven growth will rely on continuous progress in structural reforms. On the upside, Cyprus’s agile and dynamic economy offers substantial potential for growth.

    Cyprus’s strong fiscal position has reduced vulnerabilities. In 2024, the primary fiscal surplus reached 5.6 percent, fueled by significant revenue growth that more than compensated for increased public wages and social transfers. As a result, public debt decreased to 65 percent of GDP by the end of 2024, with substantial cash reserves supporting liquidity. This further increased resilience, built policy space for future shocks, and improved investor sentiment.

    Fiscal policy should continue to prioritize debt reduction. Given overheating risks, it is crucial to avoid new discretionary measures that would ease fiscal policy and add to inflationary pressures. Instead, efforts should focus on reducing debt well below 60 percent of GDP, thereby ensuring a robust buffer against potential shocks. The authorities’ commitment to maintaining fiscal surpluses through 2028, as specified in the MTFSP under the new EU economic governance framework, supports this goal.

    As spending pressures increase, careful management of fiscal space is essential. The financial commitments required for achieving climate and digital transitions will persist beyond the end of EU RRP funding. Additionally, an aging population will necessitate higher expenditures on pensions and healthcare, alongside other long-term expenditures. As a result, the scope for fiscal loosening in the medium term is constrained.

    Public spending should emphasize investment while retaining flexibility in response to economic shocks. Capital expenditures should take precedence to enhance potential growth and facilitate the climate transition. At the same time, expanding current spending—such as increasing public wages, broadening subsidies, or introducing untargeted social programs—should be avoided. Specifically, the authorities should resist further increases to the COLA indexation or new ad-hoc salary increases to contain the existing substantial public-private wage gap and prevent additional pressure on real wage growth.

    The banking sector boasts substantial capital and liquidity buffers, with financial risks appearing well-contained. Profitability metrics have reached record highs for the second consecutive year, and capitalization levels are now among the highest in Europe. Despite elevated interest rates, asset quality continues to improve, supported by strong economic growth. Nonetheless, ongoing vigilance is essential, particularly concerning the real estate sector.

    Recent tightening of the macroprudential policy stance will enhance financial buffers further. The announced increase in the CCyB will bolster resilience by securing already high capital buffers without adversely affecting credit availability or economic growth. In the future, careful calibration of macroprudential policies should continue to strike a balance between financial stability and effective credit intermediation.

    Although legacy NPLs continue to decrease, they remain at elevated levels. Most NPLs have been successfully transitioned away from the banking sector and do not pose a significant issue for financial stability. The ongoing resolution of legacy NPLs is expected to accelerate, given the full operationalization of the foreclosure framework and a strong uptake of the mortgage-to-rent scheme. Resolving legacy NPLs is expected to help mobilize domestic capital.

    Structural reforms aimed at enhancing judicial efficiency and boosting labor productivity are vital for fostering long-term growth. With employment levels already high, capital deepening will increasingly drive growth. Consequently, policies must create a stable and streamlined business environment conducive to investment. Additional efforts are required in the judicial sector to strengthen the institutional framework for insolvency and creditor rights and to improve court efficiency. Labor policies should focus on addressing skill gaps and mismatches and engaging remaining segments of the labor force, particularly among youth and the long-term unemployed.

    Key energy projects and reforms must be expedited to reduce energy costs, enhance energy security, and fulfill climate commitments. Completing the LNG terminal and improving electricity interconnectedness would represent significant progress toward these objectives. Additionally, increasing competition in the electricity market would help lower costs and emissions through market forces. The planned introduction of green taxation would further facilitate the energy transition.

    Maintaining a strong AML framework is vital for mitigating reputational risks and business uncertainty. Ongoing efforts to broaden the definition of obliged entities for AML supervision are commendable. Furthermore, the proposed establishment of the National Sanctions Implementation Unit at the Ministry of Finance will enhance clarity for reporting entities regarding compliance with sanctions.

    Table 1. Cyprus: Selected Economic Indicators, 2021–2030

     

    2021

    2022

    2023

    2024

    2025

    2026

    2027

    2028

    2029

    2030

     

     

     

     

     

    Projections

    Real Economy

    (Percent change, unless otherwise indicated)

       Real GDP

    11.4

    7.2

    2.8

    3.4

    2.5

    2.7

    3.0

    3.0

    3.0

    3.0

     Domestic demand

    5.6

    8.5

    5.2

    0.7

    4.6

    3.6

    3.6

    3.5

    3.4

    3.2

       Consumption

    5.7

    8.5

    4.8

    3.3

    3.2

    2.6

    2.8

    2.9

    2.8

    2.8

         Private consumption

    4.7

    9.8

    5.9

    3.8

    2.8

    2.9

    3.2

    3.2

    3.2

    3.1

         Public consumption

    8.9

    4.7

    1.2

    1.5

    4.4

    1.4

    1.2

    1.7

    1.7

    1.7

    Gross capital formation

    5.0

    8.5

    6.6

    -9.5

    10.5

    7.8

    7.0

    6.0

    5.5

    4.5

     Foreign balance 1/

    5.8

    -1.1

    -2.3

    3.0

    -1.9

    -0.9

    -0.7

    -0.5

    -0.4

    -0.3

       Exports of goods and services

    27.2

    27.1

    -2.8

    5.3

    4.0

    4.1

    4.0

    4.0

    4.0

    4.0

       Imports of goods and services

    19.6

    29.7

    -0.7

    2.4

    6.1

    5.1

    4.6

    4.5

    4.4

    4.2

    Potential GDP growth

    5.5

    6.1

    4.4

    3.3

    3.0

    2.9

    2.9

    3.0

    3.0

    3.0

    Output gap (percent of potential GDP)

    0.9

    2.0

    0.4

    0.6

    0.2

    -0.1

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    HICP (period average, seasonally-adjusted)

    2.3

    8.1

    3.9

    2.3

    2.2

    2.0

    2.0

    2.0

    2.0

    2.0

    HICP (end of period, seasonally-adjusted)

    4.8

    7.6

    1.9

    3.1

    2.0

    2.0

    2.0

    2.0

    2.0

    2.0

    GDP deflator

    3.0

    6.7

    3.8

    3.5

    4.7

    1.6

    1.5

    1.5

    1.5

    1.6

    Unemployment rate (percent, period average)

    7.2

    6.3

    5.8

    4.9

    4.8

    5.0

    5.0

    5.0

    5.0

    5.0

    Employment growth (percent, period average)

    3.5

    5.0

    2.8

    1.5

    0.9

    0.8

    0.9

    0.8

    0.8

    0.8

    Labor force

    3.0

    4.0

    2.3

    0.4

    0.8

    1.0

    0.9

    0.8

    0.8

    0.8

    Public Finance

    (Percent of GDP, unless otherwise indicated)

       General government balance

    -1.6

    2.7

    1.7

    4.3

    3.8

    3.5

    2.4

    2.1

    1.9

    1.6

          Revenue

    41.0

    40.6

    43.7

    44.3

    44.7

    44.3

    43.3

    43.2

    43.2

    43.2

          Expenditure

    42.6

    38.0

    42.0

    40.0

    40.9

    40.8

    40.8

    41.1

    41.4

    41.6

       Primary Fiscal Balance

    0.1

    4.0

    3.0

    5.6

    5.2

    4.8

    3.8

    3.4

    3.1

    2.9

       General government debt

    96.5

    81.1

    73.6

    65.1

    60.2

    54.9

    49.7

    44.5

    41.2

    38.3

    Balance of Payments

       Current account balance

    -5.4

    -5.4

    -9.7

    -6.1

    -7.1

    -7.7

    -8.2

    -8.7

    -9.1

    -9.4

          Trade Balance (goods and services)

    4.7

    3.6

    1.0

    3.6

    2.5

    1.8

    1.1

    0.5

    0.2

    0.0

             Exports of goods and services

    90.8

    105.6

    97.2

    96.7

    95.8

    97.4

    98.4

    99.5

    100.5

    101.5

             Imports of goods and services

    86.1

    102.0

    96.1

    93.1

    93.2

    95.6

    97.3

    98.9

    100.3

    101.6

          Goods balance

    -16.9

    -19.7

    -23.7

    -20.4

    -20.4

    -21.4

    -22.4

    -23.3

    -24.2

    -24.9

          Services balance

    21.6

    23.3

    24.7

    24.0

    22.9

    23.2

    23.5

    23.9

    24.4

    24.9

          Primary income, net

    -8.9

    -7.9

    -9.6

    -8.9

    -8.6

    -8.5

    -8.4

    -8.3

    -8.3

    -8.3

          Secondary income, net

    -1.2

    -0.7

    -1.1

    -0.8

    -1.0

    -1.0

    -1.0

    -1.0

    -1.0

    -1.0

    Capital account, net

    0.2

    0.1

    -0.1

    0.2

    0.2

    0.2

    0.1

    0.1

    0.1

    0.1

    Financial account, net

    -7.6

    -6.2

    -8.7

    -5.9

    -6.9

    -7.5

    -8.2

    -8.6

    -9.1

    -9.3

       Direct investment

    -3.3

    -27.2

    -21.0

    -18.0

    -18.0

    -18.1

    -18.3

    -18.3

    -18.5

    -18.6

       Portfolio investment

    3.9

    3.9

    11.0

    4.9

    5.8

    3.6

    4.2

    3.5

    1.5

    2.6

       Other investment and financial derivatives

    -9.6

    16.8

    1.2

    7.2

    5.3

    7.0

    5.9

    6.2

    7.9

    6.7

       Reserves ( + accumulation)

    1.4

    0.3

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    Program financing 2/

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    -1.0

    -2.7

    -2.5

    -2.4

    -2.4

    -2.0

    Errors and omissions

    -2.5

    -0.9

    1.1

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    0.0

    Saving-Investment Balance

    National saving

    13.8

    14.9

    11.8

    14.4

    13.7

    13.6

    13.4

    13.3

    13.2

    13.1

      Government

    1.8

    5.8

    6.7

    7.9

    7.8

    7.3

    6.3

    6.1

    6.1

    5.8

      Non-government

    12.0

    9.0

    5.1

    6.5

    5.9

    6.3

    7.1

    7.2

    7.1

    7.3

    Gross capital formation

    19.2

    20.3

    21.4

    20.5

    20.8

    21.3

    21.7

    22.1

    22.4

    22.5

      Government

    3.5

    3.2

    5.0

    3.6

    3.9

    3.8

    3.9

    4.1

    4.2

    4.2

      Private

    15.8

    17.1

    16.4

    16.9

    16.9

    17.4

    17.7

    18.0

    18.1

    18.2

    Foreign saving

    -5.4

    -5.4

    -9.7

    -6.1

    -7.1

    -7.7

    -8.2

    -8.7

    -9.1

    -9.4

    Memorandum Item:

       Nominal GDP (billions of euros)

    25.7

    29.4

    31.3

    33.6

    36.0

    37.6

    39.3

    41.1

    42.9

    44.9

       Structural primary balance

    -0.4

    3.3

    2.6

    5.3

    5.2

    4.8

    3.8

    3.4

    3.1

    2.9

    External debt

    994.1

    879.7

    828.3

    767.6

    706.8

    669.0

    631.4

    595.8

    564.1

    534.0

    Net IIP

    -105.7

    -95.2

    -92.7

    -98.5

    -99.3

    -102.6

    -106.9

    -111.7

    -114.6

    -118.8

    Sources: Cystat, Eurostat, Central Bank of Cyprus, and IMF staff estimates.

    1/ Contribution to real GDP growth

    2/  Program financing (+ purchases, – repurchases) is included under the Financial Account, with consistent sign conversion

    [1] Under Article IV of the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, the IMF holds bilateral discussions with members, usually every year. A staff team visits the country, collects economic and financial information, and discusses with officials the country’s economic developments and policies. On return to headquarters, the staff prepares a report, which forms the basis for discussion by the Executive Board. The Executive Board takes decisions under its lapse-of-time procedure when the Board agrees that a proposal can be considered without convening formal discussions.

    [2] Under the IMF’s Articles of Agreement, publication of documents that pertain to member countries is voluntary and requires the member consent. The staff report will be shortly published on the www.imf.org/cyprus page.

    IMF Communications Department
    MEDIA RELATIONS

    PRESS OFFICER: Boris Balabanov

    Phone: +1 202 623-7100Email: MEDIA@IMF.org

    https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2025/06/02/pr-25171-cyprus-imf-concludes-2025-art-iv-consultation

    MIL OSI

    MIL OSI Russia News

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Plymouth means business at UKREiiF 2025

    Source: City of Plymouth

    By Cllr Tudor Evans, Leader of Plymouth City Council

    This May, I had the privilege of leading Plymouth’s delegation to the UK Real Estate Investment and Infrastructure Forum (UKREiiF) in Leeds – and what a week it was.

    We went to UKREiiF with a clear purpose: to shout loud and proud about Plymouth’s ambition, our potential, and our readiness for growth. We weren’t just there to attend – we were there to lead, to connect, and to inspire. Because for Plymouth, growth isn’t just a buzzword. It’s a necessity. It’s about jobs, homes, innovation, and opportunity. It’s about building a city that works for everyone.

    From the moment we arrived, the energy was electric. Day one kicked off with a bang – our stand was buzzing with interest, and we hit the ground running with meetings, networking, and a strong presence across the event. We were there alongside major cities and regions, but we made sure Plymouth’s voice was heard. We’re not just a coastal city – we’re a city of ideas, of resilience, and of bold ambition.

    One of the highlights was our panel session, where we brought together key voices to talk about the future of cities like ours. We spoke about the power of place, the importance of sustainable development, and the need for long-term investment in infrastructure and skills. I was proud to see Plymouth leading that conversation – not just reacting to change, but shaping it.

    Throughout the week, we met with investors, developers, government officials, and partners from across the UK. We showcased our major regeneration opportunities – from the Freeport and Oceansgate to the city centre and waterfront. We talked about our strengths in marine, defence, digital, and clean energy. And we made it clear: Plymouth is open for business.But UKREiiF wasn’t just about promotion – it was about connection.

    It was about building relationships that will unlock real benefits for our city. We had meaningful conversations that we’re already following up on – conversations that could lead to new investment, new jobs, and new opportunities for our residents.

    For example, we had a fantastic conversation with Homes England. Earlier this year, we launched a bold new plan together to deliver up to 10,000 new homes in the heart of Plymouth. This isn’t just about numbers – it’s about creating a vibrant, liveable city centre that supports our growing workforce and attracts new talent. At UKREiiF, we built on this momentum with strategic conversations about other key sites.

    Marcus Ralling from Homes England was clear: Plymouth offers one of the most compelling investment stories in the country. With the right partners, we can deliver high-quality homes, strong returns, and transformational change. This partnership is already bearing fruit – and it’s only just beginning.

    What struck me most was the shared sense of purpose in all our conversations. Across the country, councils are grappling with similar challenges – housing, climate change, economic resilience. But there was also a shared optimism. A belief that with the right partnerships, the right vision, and the right leadership, we can build better places. And Plymouth is absolutely part of that story.

    So what do we hope to get out of it? Tangible outcomes. We want to see investment flow into our city. We want to accelerate delivery of key projects. We want to bring partners on board who share our vision for inclusive, sustainable growth. And we want to keep raising Plymouth’s profile – nationally and internationally – as a city that’s going places.

    UKREiiF 2025 was a milestone for us. It showed that Plymouth belongs on the national stage. It showed that we have the ambition, the assets, and the leadership to drive real change. And it reminded me – once again – why I’m so proud to lead this city.

    Growth matters. Not for its own sake, but because of what it means for people. For families looking for a decent home. For young people seeking opportunity. For businesses ready to expand. For communities that deserve investment and pride in place.

    Plymouth is ready. And we’re just getting started.

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Minister Smyth address to Medicine 2025

    Source: United Kingdom – Executive Government & Departments

    Speech

    Minister Smyth address to Medicine 2025

    Minister Smyth addressed the Royal College of Physicians annual conference

    Since 1948, this organisation has been one of the greatest allies advocating for universal access to health care, high standards in clinical practice, and evidence based medicine.

    And today, I really want to thank our members for everything that you have done over the past 14 years to hold our NHS together.

    Through no fault of your own, you’ve been through the worst crisis in the history of the NHS waiting list at historic highs, patient satisfaction at record lows, people struggling to see a GP, ambulances not turning up on time. Any department is full to bursting.

    That founding promise that the NHS will always be there for us when we needed it, broken.

    But as someone who had my own career 30 years ago in the health service, I completely understand how demoralising this has been for so many staff, how powerless people have felt desperately trying to stop standards slipping or holding a broken system together.

    That’s how I felt as an NHS leader locally, watching the disastrous 2012 reorganisation imposed from the top down, despite all the warnings from frontline leaders and staff. And since then we’ve also had to deal with underinvestment and the global pandemic.

    But while those blows may have left the NHS broken, it’s not beaten.

    Every day there are amazing people delivering outstanding and compassionate care.

    Despite all of those challenges, day in, day out, you show up for work and you fight to deliver the very best care possible for your patients.

    Since coming into office, this government has done everything we can to support you. To restore that basic founding principle that the NHS should always be there for us when we need it. With our Plan for Change, we have hit the ground running.

    As our first step, we promised two million more appointments in our first year.

    Promise made, promise kept: we delivered our promise seven months early and we’ve reached our target, delivering not two, but three million more appointments since July and counting.

    We’ve got waiting lists down by over 200,000 people.

    We ended the strike within three weeks and have now delivered two above-inflation pay rises for NHS staff.

    We’ve invested an extra £26 billion in health and care.

    We’ve recruited 1,500 more GPs, and agreed a GP contract for the first time since the pandemic.

    We’ve delivered the biggest investment to hospitals in a generation.

    The biggest expansion of carer’s allowance since the 1970s.

    A boost for older and disabled people through the Disabled Facilities Grant.

    The biggest real-terms increase to the Public Health Grant in nearly a decade.

    We’ve given pharmacies the biggest funding uplift in a generation.

    For patients, we’ve frozen prescription charges.

    We’ve struck a new deal that will mean women will be able to get the morning-after-pill from pharmacies across the country, absolutely free of charge.

    A lot done, but we know, a hell of a lot more left to do.

    But from day one, we have been clear that investment must come with reform.

    Our job is twofold.

    First, to get the NHS back on its feet, treating patients on time again, and second, to reform the service for the long term, so it is fit for the future.

    This summer we will publish our 10 Year Plan for Health.

    Shifting the focus of healthcare out of hospital and into the community with more investment in primary and community care.

    Bringing our analogue health service into the digital age, arming staff with modern equipment and cutting edge technology.

    And thirdly, turning our sickness service into a preventative health service to help people live well for longer and tackle the biggest killers.

    We’re supporting the effort of prevention through our Smoking and Vapes Bill, to protect children and the most vulnerable to make this generation of kids the first smoke-free generation, and to save untold billions spent on their future care.

    The ban on junk food advertising targeted at children will be a first step in addressing the growing problem of childhood obesity, and those same kids are benefiting from breakfast clubs, so they start school with hungry minds and not hungry bellies.

    Our Mental Health Bill will stop the disgraceful incarceration of learning-disabled adults.

    We’re working with health unions, councils and employers to deliver the first ever Fair Pay Agreement for social care staff.

    And Louise Casey is leading the Commission on Social Care, which will finally get a grip on a system that is broken for too many families.

    Because, as you all know so well, the pressures facing hospitals don’t start in hospitals, just as the problems facing the NHS don’t necessarily start in the NHS, they are a reflection of wider society.

    Fixing broken Britain will require more than fixing a broken NHS.

    After this speech, I’m going to add my own post-it note to your interactive map.

    When my team asked me to think about the most pressing issue in my constituency of Bristol South, I was very quick to answer. Poverty.

    The health service can fix people when they’re broken, but we don’t want people broken.

    The factors that make my constituents unwell are wide ranging, socioeconomic and environmental.

    In other words, the conditions in which we are born, grow, live and work. Secure jobs. Fair pay. Decent housing. Safe streets. Clean air. Accessible transport. The time and affordable facilities to exercise and nutritious food.

    These are the essential building blocks of a healthy life.

    And that’s why this government is focused on economic growth and improving healthy life expectancy for all, while halving the gap in healthy life expectancy between different regions of England.

    And it’s why reform of the health service is so important, because every pound we spend on the health service is a pound that can’t be spent on what you and I call the social determinants of ill health.

    But what everyone else calls feeding hungry children, building warm homes and cleaning up our water and the air that we breathe.

    The NHS has often been compared to an oil tanker that has immense capacity but is slow to change direction. Shifting the focus of our health service will be an immense task, and one that we can only accomplish with your help.

    We’ve already been clear that we’re embarking on a decade of national renewal and that’s why we’re launching a 10 Year Plan.

    Since coming into office, we’ve sought to reset the relationship with medics to improve working lives and restore value.

    This government was never going to be able to completely reverse a decade and a half of decline in only ten months, but this year’s pay awards, the second above inflation pay rise in a row, demonstrates our commitment to rebuilding the NHS and rebuilding the pay conditions and morale of all NHS staff.

    When I joined the NHS 30 years ago, I saw the NHS at what I thought was the worst.

    I remember later on working with the team at the Bristol Royal Infirmary on urgent care, discussing those awful trolley waits, coming into work every day, people trying to find a space or somewhere to discharge people from A&E, conversations that, sadly, are all too familiar again today.

    But I also saw, especially in the years leading up to 2010, the pride people have when they’re working in an improving, well-run system.

    When you’re able to go home at the end of the day, knowing that your patients received the best possible care and the pride, you know that you’re working at the top of your license as part of a team rebuilding a healthier Britain.

    The NHS cannot be saved by one person sitting behind a desk in Whitehall.

    We will only succeed if this is a team effort. From the Prime Minister to the 1.5 million people who work in the service, and the millions of us who use it to take decisions needed to lead healthier, more active lives.

    Turning the NHS around will take time.

    It really won’t be easy, but the prize, the prize available to us is huge and if we get this right, we will be able to say that we were the generation that took the NHS from the worst crisis in its history, got it back on its feet and made it fit for future generations.

    Updates to this page

    Published 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Security: Atlanta Man Sentenced to Federal Prison for Trafficking Crack Cocaine, Fentanyl, and Heroin

    Source: Office of United States Attorneys

    FLORENCE, S.C. — Demetrius Stepp, 45, of Atlanta, Georgia, has been sentenced to more than five years in federal prison after pleading guilty to three counts of distributing fentanyl and crack cocaine.

    Evidence presented to the court showed that on three occasions in April and May 2022, a confidential informant working with Myrtle Beach Police Department purchased narcotics from Stepp. On each occasion, Stepp claimed to sell the confidential informant quantities of heroin and crack cocaine. Lab testing later revealed that the substances sold by Stepp were not crack cocaine and heroin, but crack cocaine and fentanyl. Additional investigation showed that for years, Stepp had been involved in trafficking crack cocaine, fentanyl, and heroin throughout Horry County, often making multiple drug sales per day. 

    United States District Judge Sherri A. Lydon sentenced Stepp to 70 months imprisonment, to be followed by a six-year term of court-ordered supervision.  There is no parole in the federal system.

    This case was investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration and the Myrtle Beach Police Department. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Katherine Flynn and Matthew Ellis are prosecuting the case.

    ###

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI United Kingdom: Strategic Defence Review oral statement

    Source: United Kingdom – Government Statements

    Oral statement to Parliament

    Strategic Defence Review oral statement

    Statement from Defence Secretary John Healey on the Strategic Defence Review.

    With permission, Mr Speaker, I would like to make a statement on the Strategic Defence Review.

    And I have laid the full 130-page review report first before this house. I am grateful to be able to make this statement on the first day back from recess.

    Mr Speaker, the world has changed, and we must respond.

    The SDR is our Plan for Change for Defence.

    A plan to meet the threats we face.

    A plan to step up on European Security and lead in NATO.

    A plan that learns the lessons from Ukraine.

    A plan to seize the defence dividend from our record increase in defence investment, to boost jobs and growth throughout the United Kingdom.

    And a plan to put the men and women of our Armed Forces at the heart of our defence plans: better pay, better kit, better housing.

    Through the SDR will make our Armed Forces stronger, and the British people safer.

    I’d like to thank those who led the SDR… Lord Robertson of Port Ellen, General Barrons and Dr Fiona Hill.

    “The politician, the soldier, and a foreign policy expert”, as they say themselves in their forward. Thye have put in a huge effort, alongside others.

    This is a first-of-its-kind, externally led review.

    A process, in which we received 8 000 submissions from experts, individuals, organisations, and MPs from across the House, including the Shadow Defence Secretary.

    I thank them all – and I thank those in the MOD who have contributed to this SDR.

    This is not just the government’s review it is Britain’s defence review.

    And so, the government endorses the SDR’s vision, accepts its 62 recommendations, which will be implemented.

    Mr Speaker, the threats we face is now more serious and less predictable than at any time since the of Cold War.

    We face war in Europe, growing Russian aggression, new nuclear risks, and daily cyber-attacks at home. 

    Our adversaries are working more in alliance with one another, while technology is changing the way war is fought.

    We are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for UK Defence.

    Mr Speaker, since the General Election we have demonstrated that we are a government dedicated to delivering for defence.

    Committing the largest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the Cold War… £5 billion extra this year, 2.5% in 2027, the ambition to 3% in the next parliament.

    Mr Speaker, there can be no investment without reform.

    And so we are already driving also the deepest reforms to defence in 50 years.

    And these will ensure clearer responsibilities, better delivery, stronger budget control and new efficiencies, worth £6 billion in this parliament, money all of which will be reinvested directly into defence.

    Mr Speaker, our Armed Forces will always do what’s needed to keep the nation safe –24/7, in more than 50 countries around the world.

    But in a more dangerous world, the SDR confirms that we must move to warfighting readiness.

    Warfighting readiness means stronger deterrence.

    We need stronger deterrence to avoid the huge costs, human and economic that wars create.

    And we prevent wars by being strong enough to fight and win them. And that is what has made NATO the most successful defence alliance in history, over the last 75 years.

    So Mr Speaker, we will establish a “New Hybrid Navy” by:

    … building Dreadnought, AUKUS submarines, cutting-edge warships and new autonomous vessels.

    Our carriers will carry the first hybrid airwings in Europe.

    We will develop the next generation RAF with:

    F35s, upgraded Typhoons, 6th Gen GCAP and autonomous fighters, to defend Britain’s skies and be able to strike anywhere in the world.

    And we will make the British Army 10 times more lethal by:

    Combining the future technology of drones, autonomy and AI with the heavy metal tanks and artillery.

    Mr Speaker for too long, our Army has been asked to do more with less.

    We inherited a long run recruitment crisis – [political content removed].

    Reversing this decline will take time but we are acting to stem the loss now and aiming to increase the British Army to at least 76,000 full time soldiers in the next parliament.

    Mr Speaker, for the first time in a generation, we are a government who want the number of regular soldiers to rise.

    In our homeland, Mr Speaker, this a government that will protect our island home, we’ll do so by:

    Committing £1bn in new funding to homeland air and missile defences,  by creating a new CyberEM Command to defend Britain in the grey zone and by preparing legislation to improve defence readiness.

    Mr. Speaker, as Ukraine shows a country’s armed forces are only as strong as the industry that stands behind them.

    So this SDR begins a new partnership with industry, with innovators and with investors, we will make engine. We will make defence an engine for growth, an engine for growth to create jobs and increase prosperity in every nation and every region of the UK.

    Take our nuclear enterprise.

    We will commit 15 billion pounds in investment into the sovereign warhead programme in this Parliament, supporting over 9000 jobs. We will establish continuous submarine production through investments in Barrow and in Derby, that will allow us to produce a submarine every 18 months, allowing us to grow our nuclear attack submarine fleet to up to 12 submarines, supporting more than 20,000 jobs.

    And on munitions, we will invest 6 billion pounds in this Parliament, including for six new munitions factories and up to 7000 new long-range weapons, supporting nearly 2000 jobs.

    Mr. Speaker, the lives of workers in Barrow or Derby or Govan, where I was with the Prime Minister this morning, are being transformed, not just by this defence investment, but by the pride and purpose that comes with work that comes with defence work. And in the coming years, more communities and more working people will benefit from the defence dividend that this brings.

    Mr. Speaker Ukraine also tells us that whoever gets new technology into the hands of their armed forces fastest will have the advantage. So we will place Britain at the leading edge of innovation in NATO.

    We will double investment into autonomous systems this parliament. We will invest more than a billion pounds to integrate our armed forces through a new digital targeting web, and we will finance a £400 million UK Defence Innovation organization.

    Mr. Speaker, to ensure that Britain gains the maximum benefit from what we invent and what we produce in this country, we will create a new defence exports office in the MOD, driving exports to our allies and driving growth at home.

    Mr. Speaker, the SDR sets a new vision, a new framework for defence investment.

    The work to confirm a new defence investment plan, superseding the last government’s defence equipment plan, will be completed in the autumn.

    It will ensure our frontline forces get what they need when they need it.

    The plan will be deliverable. It will be affordable. It will consider infrastructure alongside capabilities. It will seize the opportunities of advanced tech, and it will seize the opportunities to grow the British economy.

    And Mr. Speaker, as we lose the national service generation, fewer families across this country have a direct connection to the armed forces. And so we must do more to reconnect the nation with those who defend us.

    And so as the SDR recommends, we will increase the number of cadets by 30%, we will introduce a voluntary Gap Year scheme for school and college leavers, and we will develop a new strategic reserve by 2030.

    Mr. Speaker, we must also renew the nation’s contract with those who serve. We’ve already awarded the biggest pay increase in over 20 years, an inflation busting increase this year. And now I’ve announced we will invest 7 billion pounds of funding this parliament for military accommodation, including 1.5 billion of new money for rapid work to deal with the scandal of military family homes.

    Mr. Speaker, this SDR is the first defence review in a generation for growth and for transformation in UK defence. It will end 14 years of hollowing out in our armed forces, and instead, we will see investment increased, the Navy expanded, the army grown, the Air Force upgraded, war fighting readiness, restored, NATO strengthened, the nuclear deterrent, guaranteed advanced technology developed and jobs, jobs created. Jobs created in every nation, and region of this country. Mr. Speaker. Mr. Strategic Defence Review will make Britain, safer, more secure, at home, and stronger abroad.

    Updates to this page

    Published 2 June 2025

    MIL OSI United Kingdom

  • MIL-OSI Security: Justice Department Requires Keysight to Divest Assets to Proceed with Spirent Acquisition

    Source: United States Attorneys General

    The Proposed Settlement Requires a Substantial Divestiture Package That Will Preserve Competition for Specialized Communications Test and Measurement Equipment

    The Justice Department’s Antitrust Division announced today that it will require Keysight Technologies Inc. (Keysight) to divest Spirent Communications plc.’s (Spirent) high-speed ethernet testing, network security testing, and RF channel emulation businesses to resolve antitrust concerns arising from their proposed $1.5 billion merger.

    The Antitrust Division filed a civil antitrust lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to block the proposed transaction. At the same time, the Division filed a proposed settlement that, if approved by the court, would resolve the Division’s competitive concerns.

    “This structural solution preserves competition for key testing equipment used to ensure that data moves quickly and securely across the world. The proposed divestiture to Viavi, an established and innovative test and measurement company, ensures that American consumers and businesses will continue to benefit from competition that promotes innovation, and which allows American companies to maintain global leadership,” said Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater of the Antitrust Division. “This consent decree proceeding secures enforceable commitments from the merging parties, provides transparency into the Antitrust Division’s efforts to resolve merger investigations, and gives the public an opportunity to comment as provided by statute.”

    According to the complaint, Keysight and Spirent dominate the markets in the United States for high-speed ethernet testing, network security testing, and RF channel emulators. High-tech companies – including chipset manufacturers, cloud computing providers, mobile network operators, government labs, and large enterprises – rely on the Defendants’ products to validate that their networks and network equipment are functional, secure, and integrating the latest technology. The parties together account for 85% of the market for high-speed ethernet testing, more than 60% of the market for network security testing, and more than 50% of the market for RF channel emulators. Keysight and Spirent are each other’s closest competitors in these markets and compete head-to-head to develop and sell this crucial test equipment. Without the proposed divestiture, Keysight’s acquisition of Spirent would likely result in higher prices, lower quality, and reduced innovation to the detriment of customers and American consumers.

    The proposed settlement requires Keysight to divest Spirent’s high-speed ethernet testing, network security testing, and RF channel emulation businesses to Viavi, including all tangible and intangible assets necessary to produce and sell these products. Together, these three business lines account for about 40% of Spirent’s total revenues. Viavi is expected to hire certain key Spirent employees that today support the divested business lines.

    Keysight is an American company incorporated in Delaware with its principal office in Santa Rosa, California. Keysight offers design, emulation, and test solutions across a range of industries, including commercial communications; aerospace, defense, and government; and electronic industrial. In 2024, Keysight had global revenue of approximately $4.97 billion.   

    Spirent is a global company incorporated in the United Kingdom with its principal office in Crawley, England. Spirent offers automated test and assurance solutions for networks, cybersecurity, and satellite positioning. In 2024, Spirent had global revenue of approximately $460.2 million.

    As required by the Tunney Act, the proposed settlement, along with the Department’s competitive impact statement, will be published in the Federal Register. Any person may submit written comments concerning the proposed settlement within 60 days of its publication to Jared Hughes, Assistant Chief, Media, Entertainment, and Communications Section, Antitrust Division, U.S. Department of Justice, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Suite 7000, Washington, D.C. 20530 or via email at ATR.MEC.Information@usdoj.gov. At the conclusion of the 60-day comment period, the court may enter the final judgment upon a finding that it serves the public interest.

    MIL Security OSI

  • MIL-OSI Global: How medieval lessons for managing floods could help those facing them in northern Italy today

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Marco Panato, Leverhulme Early Career Fellow, Department of History, University of Nottingham

    Saint Fredianus diverts the Serchio River by Filippo Lippi, 1438
    Wikiart

    Northern Italy has been hit by a series of devastating floods in recent years. In March 2025 and the previous autumn, heavy rainfall hammered the region, swamping fields, farms and towns. More than 3,000 had to leave their homes in Emilia-Romagna, between Bologna and Ravenna.

    The downpours caused widespread floods, landslides, and infrastructure damage. This has been a repeated event since 2023 when the area saw what has been called the worst flood in a century.

    While climate change is a major factor behind the likelihood of these disasters, human neglect has worsened the risk. Decades of poor maintenance of drainage canals and ageing riverbanks – some of which are medieval, like those in Bologna – have made the Po valley particularly vulnerable.

    As the meteorologist James Parrish has explained, when dried-out soil suddenly receives half a year’s rainfall in two days, even modern flood defences cannot cope, especially in a landscape prone to waterlogging.

    According to the Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research and the data collected in 2021 by the National Institute of Statistics, in Emilia-Romagna alone, over 2.5 million live in areas of high or medium flood-risk.

    Yet if today’s floods feel apocalyptic, history tells us that living with floods is nothing new in these territories. Medieval communities faced similar challenges and how they lived with water may offer lessons for today.


    Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


    Since the earliest times, people in the Po valley developed what the historian Petra van Dam calls an amphibious culture: a way of life that continuously adjusted to the threats and benefits posed by rivers. From the Terramare and Etruscan cultures in the second and first millennium BC (but even earlier) to the middle ages and in some cases even now, communities did not just fight floods; they integrated them into their daily lives and economies.

    After the fall of the Roman state, Italy entered a period of intense political, socio-economic, climatic and environmental change. As archaeological and historical research shows, settlements from this period often clustered near waterways despite their risks.

    Every year, rivers overflowed destroying crops or buildings. Evidence of these events comes from contemporary narratives, such as the life of Saint Fredianus, and in the flood layers buried in the soil. Traces are even found in cave minerals in the Apuan Alps.

    Why live so close to something so destructive? Because rivers also brought huge benefits like fertile land, irrigation, mills, fish, woodlands and trade.

    Communities adapted in practical ways. They grew crops suited to wet soils, grazed animals in seasonal marshes, and even breached riverbanks on purpose to let in muddy water that deposited rich sediment for farming. To stay dry, they also built houses on natural or artificial high grounds above floodwaters.

    These strategies show a deep resilience in medieval societies, something to keep in mind also in the current situation.

    A shared responsibility

    In early medieval Italy, people dug canals and drained wetlands not just to farm new land, but also to manage flooding and redirect rivers. These projects were often led by monasteries, landowners, and farmers, who worked together out of necessity.

    Research research from the Maremma wetlands in Tuscany shows how communities and rulers cooperated to maintain dikes, drainage channels, and salt pans (where seawater was left to dry and leave behind salt). Local know-how and labour mattered as much as political coordination and investment.

    Today, people often expect the state to manage floods. But public response is not always quick or fair. For instance, in Traversara, a village severely hit by floods, locals were furious towards proposed mandatory insurance policies, feeling abandoned by authorities.

    Modern flood defence relies heavily on centralised systems, satellite monitoring and major infrastructure projects. These tools are crucial, but not enough.

    Historical lessons suggest that effective flood resilience must also incorporate local (historical) knowledge and community participation. Some solutions include restoring spaces for rivers to overflow safely and continuous targeted maintenance of canals and levees.

    Strengthening and adapting Italy’s consorzi di donifica – local organisations responsible for drainage and water management – could revive a model of shared governance that proved successful for centuries.

    As recently suggested in the response strategies to the 2023 floods, responsive resilience takes teamwork. National, regional, and local actors must coordinate. In this case, adopting an “amphibious” mentality – one that views rivers not just as threats but as central, living elements of the landscape – could help reshape flood policy.

    Combining historical understanding with modern science and community empowerment can guide better ways to live with water. Medieval societies, through trial and adaptation, managed to coexist with their rivers. Relearning from them today could help build more sustainable futures in flood-prone regions – not only in Italy, but across the globe.


    Looking for something good? Cut through the noise with a carefully curated selection of the latest releases, live events and exhibitions, straight to your inbox every fortnight, on Fridays. Sign up here.


    Marco Panato does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. How medieval lessons for managing floods could help those facing them in northern Italy today – https://theconversation.com/how-medieval-lessons-for-managing-floods-could-help-those-facing-them-in-northern-italy-today-257062

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: What birds can teach us about repurposing waste

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By David Farrier, Professor of Literature and the Environment, University of Edinburgh

    Some birds use deterrent spikes to make their nests. Chemari/Shutterstock

    Modern cities are evolution engines. Urban snails in the Netherlands and lizards in Los Angeles have developed lighter shells and larger scales to cope with the heat island effect, where temperatures can be several degrees above the surrounding area.

    Artificial light makes an artificial dawn, shifting the time when birds sing, and has prompted urban bridge-dwelling spiders to develop an attraction to light, whereas ermine moths are losing theirs altogether. A mutation in the so-called “daredevil gene”, also found in downhill skiers and snowboarders, is making urban swans bolder and more tolerant of humans.

    Our urban environments are pushing many species to reimagine their bodies and behaviours to suit municipal living; but some are also reimagining our cities. There’s lots to learn from how nature adapts to city life.


    Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


    Anti-bird spikes are a hostile architecture for wildlife, designed to keep messy nature away from buildings. Yet, crows and magpies in Rotterdam, Antwerp and Glasgow strip the spikes away and use them to make their nests.

    It’s difficult to imagine finding ease in a nest that has all the comfort of a tangled ball of wire, but the birds occupy them contentedly, improvising shelter from materials intended to exclude.

    Evolutionary biologists call this process “exaptation”. For example, feathers originally evolved to keep bird-like dinosaurs like Archaeopteryx warm. These feathers were adaptations to colder temperatures and only later repurposed, or exapted, to allow flight.

    Exaptation places repurposing at the heart of evolution; what if we were to design our homes on the same basis?

    Repurposing waste

    The Waste House is a two-storey model home in Brighton, made almost entirely from household and construction waste. When I visited the Waste House while researching my book, Nature’s Genius: Evolution’s Lessons for a Changing Planet, I loved the sense of possibility found in a staircase made of compressed paper or carpet tiles lapped like slates round its outside walls.

    But what lingered most vividly were the little windows built into the inside walls, showing what materials they’d used as insulation: old duvets and bicycle inner tubes, and in one window a library of DVDs. One of these was a copy of Groundhog Day – a film where the same day repeats on an endless loop.

    Built in 2013–14 behind the University of Brighton’s faculty of arts building, Waste House is made from construciton and household waste.
    Hassocks5489/Wikimedia, CC BY-NC-ND

    We’re similarly stuck in a rigid pattern of extraction, consumption and waste that plays again and again, day after day. But rather than a loop, this pattern is stubbornly linear, with hundreds of millions of tonnes of usable materials flowing into the dead end of landfill every year.

    The problem is that so much of what we make is designed with a single use or purpose in mind. We tend not to think about what a material or an object could become at the end of its life. But exaptation teaches us to stop seeing things as they are, and instead imagine their potential to be something new.

    In Edinburgh, Pianodrome is a performance space that’s assembled entirely from old pianos. Audiences climb staircases made of soundboards, clutching bannisters that were piano lids and rest their heads against seatbacks conjured from reclaimed keyboards. Destined for landfill, these instruments have instead found a new life as space for people to gather and perform.

    But like all exapted features, their new life hasn’t erased the old. Pianodrome’s makers left the strings of the old piano harps in place, buried in the heart of the structure. Just as feathers still keep flighted birds warm, and spikes that kept birds from buildings help crows and magpies to protect their nests from predators, whenever a performance takes place inside it, pianodrome resonates like one giant instrument.

    An exaptive approach could help birth a circular economy, taking us out of this damaging loop of extraction and consumption, and finding value in what we currently discard. Leaving materials to waste imposes a barrier, a limit on what could be. But the birds who build their nests from anti-bird spikes teach us that what was once a barrier can become a shelter.


    Don’t have time to read about climate change as much as you’d like?

    Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation’s environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 45,000+ readers who’ve subscribed so far.


    David Farrier does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

    ref. What birds can teach us about repurposing waste – https://theconversation.com/what-birds-can-teach-us-about-repurposing-waste-256519

    MIL OSI – Global Reports

  • MIL-OSI Global: Ukraine drone strikes on Russian airbase reveal any country is vulnerable to the same kind of attack

    Source: The Conversation – UK – By Michael A. Lewis, Professor of Operations and Supply Management, University of Bath

    Melnikov Dmitriy / Shutterstock

    Ukrainians are celebrating the success of one of the most audacious coups of the war against Russia – a coordinated drone strike on June 1 on five airbases deep inside Russian territory. Known as Operation Spiderweb, it was the result of 18 months of planning and involved the smuggling of drones into Russia, synchronised launch timings and improvised control centres hidden inside freight vehicles.

    Ukrainian sources claim more than 40 Russian aircraft were damaged or destroyed. Commercial satellite imagery confirms significant fire damage, cratered runways, and blast patterns across multiple sites, although the full extent of losses remains disputed.

    The targets were strategic bomber aircraft and surveillance planes, including Tu-95s and A-50 airborne early warning systems. The drones were launched from inside Russia and navigated at treetop level using line-of-sight piloting and GPS pre-programming.

    Each was controlled from a mobile ground station parked within striking distance of the target. It is reported that a total of 117 drones were deployed across five locations. While many were likely intercepted, or fell short, enough reached their targets to signal a dramatic breach in Russia’s rear-area defence.


    Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK’s latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.


    The drone platforms themselves were familiar. These were adapted first-person-view (FPV) multirotor drones. These are ones where the operator gets a first-person perspective from the drone’s onboard camera.

    These are already used in huge numbers along the front lines in Ukraine by both sides. But Operation Spiderweb extended their impact through logistical infiltration and timing.

    Nations treat their airspace as sovereign, a controlled environment: mapped, regulated and watched over. Air defence systems are built on the assumption that threats come from above and from beyond national borders. Detection and response also reflect that logic. It is focused on mid and high-altitude surveillance and approach paths from beyond national borders.

    But Operation Spiderweb exposed what happens when states are attacked from below and from within. In low-level airspace, visibility drops, responsibility fragments, and detection tools lose their edge. Drones arrive unannounced, response times lag, coordination breaks.

    Spiderweb worked not because of what each drone could do individually, but because of how the operation was designed. It was secret and carefully planned of course, but also mobile, flexible and loosely coordinated.

    The cost of each drone was low but the overall effect was high. This isn’t just asymmetric warfare, it’s a different kind of offensive capability – and any defence needs to adapt accordingly.

    On Ukraine’s front lines, where drone threats are constant, both sides have adapted by deploying layers of detection tools, short range air defences and jamming systems. In turn, drone operators have turned to alternatives. One option is drones that use spools of shielded fibre optic cable. The cable is attached to the drone at one end and to the controller held by the operator at the other. Another option involves drones with preloaded flight paths to avoid detection.

    Fibre links, when used for control or coordination, emit no radio signal and so bypass radio frequency (RF) -based surveillance entirely. There is nothing to intercept or jam. Preloaded paths remove the need for live communication altogether. Once launched, the drone follows a pre-programmed route without broadcasting its position or receiving commands.

    As a result, airspace is never assumed to be secure but is instead understood to be actively contested and requiring continuous management. By contrast, Operation Spiderweb targeted rear area airbases where more limited adaptive systems existed. The drones flew low, through unmonitored gaps, exploiting assumptions about what kind of threat was faced and from where.

    Tu-95 bombers were among the planes destroyed.
    Almaz Mustafin

    Spiderweb is not the first long-range drone operation of this war, nor the first to exploit gaps in Russian defences. What Spiderweb confirms is that the gaps in airspace can be used by any party with enough planning and the right technology. They can be exploited not just by states and not just in war. The technology is not rare and the tactics are not complicated. What Ukraine did was to combine them in a way that existing systems could not prevent the attack or maybe even see it coming.

    This is far from a uniquely Russian vulnerability – it is the defining governance challenge of drones in low level airspace. Civil and military airspace management relies on the idea that flight paths are knowable and can be secured. In our work on UK drone regulation, we have described low level airspace as acting like a common pool resource.

    This means that airspace is widely accessible. It is also difficult to keep out drones with unpredictable flightpaths. Under this vision of airspace, it can only be meaningfully governed by more agile and distributed decision making. Operation Spiderweb confirms that military airspace behaves in a similar way. Centralised systems to govern airspace can struggle to cope with what happens at the scale of the Ukrainian attacks – and the cost of failure can be strategic.

    Improving low-level airspace governance will require better technologies, better detection and faster responses. New sensor technologies such as passive radio frequency detectors, thermal imaging, and acoustic (sound-based) arrays can help close current visibility gaps, especially when combined. But detection alone is not enough. Interceptors including capture drones (drones that hunt and disable other drones), nets to ensnare drones, and directed energy weapons such as high powered lasers are being developed and trialled. However, most of these are limited by range, cost, or legal constraints.

    Nevertheless, airspace is being reshaped by new forms of access, use and improvisation. Institutions built around centralised ideas of control; air corridors, zones, and licensing are being outpaced. Security responses are struggling to adapt to the fact that airspace with drones is different. It is no longer passively governed by altitude and authority. It must be actively and differently managed.

    Operation Spiderweb didn’t just reveal how Ukraine could strike deep into Russian territory. It showed how little margin for error there is in a world where cheap systems can be used quietly and precisely. That is not just a military challenge. It is a problem where airspace management depends less on central control and more on distributed coordination, shared monitoring and responsive intervention. The absence of these conditions is what Spiderweb exploited.

    Michael A. Lewis receives funding from the ESRC, AHRC and EPSRC

    ref. Ukraine drone strikes on Russian airbase reveal any country is vulnerable to the same kind of attack – https://theconversation.com/ukraine-drone-strikes-on-russian-airbase-reveal-any-country-is-vulnerable-to-the-same-kind-of-attack-258005

    MIL OSI – Global Reports